HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/27/1992 - Adopted Board RecordsACTION NO. A-102792-1
ITEM NUMBER -Z
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 27, 1992
AGENDA ITEM•
Reconsideration of request to upgrade Hewlett-Packard system
to support Administrative computing.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
O
This request is being resubmitted at the request of Supervisor
Nickens who voted with the prevailing side when this issue was
considered on October 13, 1992.
For the past twenty-four months staff have carefully monitored
resource availability on the County HP950 central computer. The
number of applications supported and the number of users
concurrently accessing the computer has grown at a rate much
greater than anticipated, from 50 in 1990 to over 110 in 1992.
Attached is a document which chronologically shows the addition of
applications and the subsequent effect on the growth in the number
of users. In December 1990 it was evident that an upgrade would be
required as early as FY 92/93. Staff prepared and submitted
requests for an upgrade as part of previous budget processes and
the CIP. Due to the economic situation last year, staff instituted
procedures to maintain support without requesting funds to
alleviate the problem. A limitation was placed on the number of
concurrent users to assure adequate response, and occasionally,
some users are requested to sign off to allow access for critical
applications. The County is currently operating well above the
recommended equipment utilization level. This hinders the
provision of good customer service to our citizens and lowers the
productivity of employees.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
New equipment with twice the power can now be purchased at 25%
of the cost of the original equipment with additional savings of
approximately $620 per month for hardware and software maintenance.
There will be additional savings from reduced power consumption to
run the equipment and provide air conditioning.
Until October 31, 1992, the vendor is offering a savings of $35,000
to all current users of their model HP950 computers if they trade
in their existing equipment and upgrade to a model HP957. This is
a one-time opportunity for the County to replace the current
equipment with minimal additional funds. The new equipment would
provide for lower operating costs and address critical capacity and
utilization concerns. Delaying the decision to purchase the
equipment could cost the County an additional $35,000, could result
in increased maintenance costs, and will not solve the utilization
problems that exist with the current HP model.
FISCAL IMPACT•
There would be no additional funds required during the current
year. The current lease/purchase agreement would be extended an
additional two years and three months at a reduced monthly payment.
Operating expenses would be reduced by over $7,400 annually.
Attached is a funding schedule showing the additional funds
required through FY 95/96. The total appropriation of $119,641
would be included in future budget requests.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the
replacement of the current Hewlett-Packard system. Staff further
requests authorization to execute a three-year lease/purchase
agreement taking advantage of the trade-in and promotional
incentives offered by Hewlett-Packard until October 31, 1992.
Respectfully submitted,
Oscar D. Bry4ffit
Director, M.I.S.
MOTION #1
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred ( )
To ( )
Approved by,
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
Action
Motion by: Harry C. Nickens
motion to reconsider reauest
Vote
No Yes Absent
Eddy x
Johnson x
Kohinke x
Minnix x
Nickens x
cc: File
Oscar D. Bryant, Director, M.I.S.
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement
MOTION #2 - NEXT PAGE
-------------
MOTION #2
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred ( )
To ( )
cc: File
ACTION VOTE
Motion by: HARRY C. NICKENS No Ye
AMENDED MOTION TO APPROVE Eddy
REPLACEMENT OF CURRENT H. P. Johnson
SYSTEM AFTER TAKING ADVANTAGE Kohinke
OF TRADE-INS OFFERED BY H. P. Minnix
AND APPROPRIATE $126,281 FROM Nickens
CURRENT UNAPPROPRIATED FUND
BALANCE WHICH WOULD INCLUDE PAYOFF
OF CURRENT LEASE PURCHASE
Yes
Oscar D. Bryant, Director, M.I.S.
Reta R. Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement
Absent
X
X
X
X
X
CHRONOLOGICAL REPORT OF APPLICATION IMPLEMENTATION AND USER GROWTH
o May 1990 user access limit was raised from 50 to 70.
- PASCO III (Real Estate Assessment system) was brought
on-line.
- FAMIS (Financial Information System) was nearing
implementation and access was restricted to select
Finance staff.
- Clerk of Court Indexing system was brought on-line with
access limited to Clerk staff and vault researchers.
o September 1990 user access limit raised from 70 to 80.
- Access demand increases as PASCO III, FAMIS, and
INDEXING systems are opened for access to other
departments.
o November 1990 user access limit raised from 80 to 90.
- Posthaste (Email) was installed. Current system users
and others request access to application.
- Additional users request access to Assessor's, Finance,
and Clerk of Court systems.
o February 1991 user access limit raised from 90 to 110.
- Business License system was brought on-line which
increases the number of users in the Commisioner of
Revenue office and adds new users to the system.
o November 1991
- Building Permits system brought on-line which increases
the number of users in Engineering and Inspections and
adds new users to the system.
- County departments, Schools, and the Town of Vinton are
informed that no new applications will be added to the
system and users are requested to limit the amount of
time signed -on the system.
o January 1992
- MIS implemented procedures to improve system
performance. This includes mandatory restrictions on
access time by non-critical users.
o October 1992
- An additional 40 users are currently on waiting list
for system access. Requesting departments include;
Social Services, Sheriffs Office, Engineering and
Inspections, Police, Fire and Rescue.
ZD -2
Hewlett Packard Upgrade Proposal
$72,864 December 1992 HP950 Lease payoff.
100,338 HP957 upgrade cost.
$173,202 Total amount to finance.
(72,905) Funds obligated in FY 92-93 and 93-94 for existing lease @ 8100.55 per month.
$100,297 New money required for lump sum payment.
$119,641 New money required @ 5348.49 per month for 36 months.
NOTES: Required software upgrade cost will be funded with current year maintenance savings.
The machine resources for additional applications will be available with the system
upgrade, however, current staffing levels will not support such additions.
FUNDING SCHEDULE
FOOTNOTES 1 2,5 3 4,5
(1) The new lease at seven percent, will be for three years, and will cover the balance due
on the old lease and the new equipment.
(2) This is the balance on the existing lease which goes through September 1993.
(3) Funds budgeted for FY 92-93, but not required, would be carried over for use in FY 93-94.
(4) Schedule of new money needed to meet the requirements of the new lease.
(5) These schedules are predicated upon having the new equipment installed by the end
of December 1992, and that the new lease will begin by January 1993.
UPGRADE
CURRENT
NEW
LEASE
LEASE
CARRY
MONEY
PAYMENTS
' OBLIGATION
OVER
NEEDED
F92-93
$32,091.00
$48,603.00
$16,512.00
$0.00
93-94
64,182.00
24,302.00
(16,512.00)
23,368.00
94-95
64,182.00
64,182.00
95-96
32,091.00
32,091.00
$192,546.00
$72,905.00
$0.00
$119,641.00
FOOTNOTES 1 2,5 3 4,5
(1) The new lease at seven percent, will be for three years, and will cover the balance due
on the old lease and the new equipment.
(2) This is the balance on the existing lease which goes through September 1993.
(3) Funds budgeted for FY 92-93, but not required, would be carried over for use in FY 93-94.
(4) Schedule of new money needed to meet the requirements of the new lease.
(5) These schedules are predicated upon having the new equipment installed by the end
of December 1992, and that the new lease will begin by January 1993.
ACTION NUMBER A-102792-2
ITEM NUMBER Z —4
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 27, 1992
SUBJECT: Request to Execute a Mutual Aid Agreement with Franklin
County
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
Title 27 of the Code of Virginia provides for the
establishment of mutual aid agreements between political
jurisdictions for the purpose of providing fire and rescue services.
Roanoke County has set a goal of obtaining a written mutual aid
agreement with all surrounding localities.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Roanoke County fire and rescue stations have had a long
standing verbal agreement with Franklin County stations to provide
fire and rescue response upon request from either locality. In
fact, there are two sections of Franklin County that the Bent
Mountain station have served since its founding. Whenever service
was needed from this station, the citizens of Franklin County
accessed our communications center through a Bent Mountain emergency
number. Franklin County is in the process of implementing their 911
phone system and these citizens will soon have this emergency access
service. The Director of Public Safety has requested that we
formalize our agreement for mutual aid assistance from either
jurisdiction to better serve the citizens of both counties, and to
specifically address the areas that we currently provide primary
response to in Franklin County. Franklin County has provided a
mutual aid agreement for our action, and the document has been
reviewed by the Senior Assistant County Attorney. He sees no legal
reasons that should preclude the approval and execution of this
document.
FISCAL IMPACT•
With the approval and implementation of this agreement the only
fiscal impact will be for cost associated with emergency response.
This should equal out with response received from Franklin County.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board authorize the County
Administrator to execute such documents and take such action as may
be necessary to accomplish the purposes of this transaction, all
upon form to be approved by the County Attorney.
SUBMITTED BY:
T. C. F qua
Chief f Fi4-e and Rescue
Elmer C. Hodge, Jr.
County Administrator
ACTION VOTE
Approved (X) Motion by: Edward G Kohinke No Yes Ab.2nt
Denied ( ) motion to approve mutual aid Eddy X
Received ( ) agreement Johnson _x
Referred Kohinke _ x
To Minnix x
Nickens x
cc: File
T. C. Fuqua, Chief of Fire & Rescue
John Cease, Chief of Police
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
�-y
This Agreement, made and entered into this day of ,
1992, by and between the COUNTY OF FRANKLIN, VIRGINIA, hereinafter referred to
as Franklin County and the COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, hereinafter referred
to as Roanoke County.
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Franklin County and the Board
of Supervisors of Roanoke County desire to provide the best and most cost-
effective fire protection, EMS and rescue services for their citizens; and
WHEREAS, both Franklin County and Roanoke County maintain
firefighting and EMS equipment and provide for these services with the help
of dedicated volunteers, as authorized by sections 27-6.1, 32.1-156, and
27-23.1 of the Code of Virginia; and
WHEREAS, both the Board of Supervisors of Franklin County and the
Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County have concurred in the effort to develop
a mutual aid agreement for improved firefighting and EMS capabilities within
and around the jurisdictions of Franklin County and Roanoke County, as
authorized by Sections 27-1, 27-2, 27-4, and 27-23.1 of the Code of Virginia.
NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the undertakings
hereinafter set out, the parties covenant and agree as follows:
Mutual Aid Agreement, Franklin County - Roanoke County
Page 1 of 7
O-
1. Mutual Aid in Firefighting and EMS/Rescue -
a. The Franklin County Department of Public Safety, Fire
Division and EMS/Rescue Division will respond or cause
response to any call for mutual aid within Roanoke County,
when personnel and equipment are available and can be safely
spared. Response will be initiated as requested by
authorized personnel or automatically as outlined by first
response areas designated by Roanoke County.
b. The Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department
will respond to any call for mutual aid within
Franklin County, when personnel and equipment are available
and can be safely spared. Response will be initiated
automatically as outlined in the current Standard Operating
Procedures of the Franklin County Department of Public
Safety or anytime at the request of Franklin County or
Franklin County Public Safety Units. Automatic mutual aid
will be inititiated within the boundaries of the fire and
EMS/Rescue response zones marked on a map of the County and
maintained in the office of the Franklin County Department
of Public Safety. Pursuant to Section 8-11.4 of the
Franklin County Code, fire boundaries and EMS boundaries may
be changed from time to time in order to provide for the
best services available.
Mutual Aid Agreement, Franklin County - Roanoke County
Page 2 of 7
0
.D- y
2. Assistance in non -designated areas -
Franklin County and Roanoke County agree to
respond when called to assist in the other areas not
described in this agreement when the personnel and
equipment are available and can be safety spared.
3. Designation of officials -
Franklin County and Roanoke County fire and EMS/Rescue units
shall respond to a call for service only upon request
of the official designated for that purpose. The parties
shall notify one another of the identity of the official
or officials designated to request such assistance.
4. Notification of calls -
The Franklin County Communications Center will notify units
of both Franklin County and Roanoke County of all
fire and EMS/Rescue calls received within Franklin County
where mutual aid assistance is required.
Calls for service received by the other jurisdiction will
will be directed to the respective Communications
Center for appropriate handling.
Mutual Aid Agreement, Franklin County - Roanoke County
Page 3 of 7
,2)_y
5. Application of Department policies -
Officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall comply
with the operational policies of their respective
departments. The parties agree to hold their own officers,
agents, employees, and volunteers, respectively, responsible
and accountable for compliance with operational policies of
the respective departments.
6. Supervision and control of joint services -
Pursuant to Section 27-23.9 of the Code of Virginia,
whenever two or more fire companies or departments are
called to provide joint services in any district or
political subdivision, the commander of the first company
to arrive shall have general supervision and control of all
such participating companies and departments until an
officer of such district or political subdivision who is
otherwise authorized by law to do so shall assume such
general supervision and control. For the purposes of this
section, districts and political subdivisions are concurrent
and general supervision and control of firefighting and EMS
activities within Franklin County shall be conducted by
officers designated in the latest command structure of the
Franklin County Department of Public Safety as maintained in
writing in that office and approved by the Franklin County
Board of Supervisors.
Mutual Aid Agreement, Franklin County - Roanoke County
Page 4 of 7
6
7. Retention of benefits -
While acting under this agreement, officers, agents,
employees, and volunteers shall have all of the immunities
from liabilities and exemptions from laws, ordinances, and
regulations and shall have all the pension, relief,
disability, workers' compensation, and other benefits
enjoyed by them while performing their respective duties
within the territorial limits of their own political
subdivision.
8. Indemnification, save harmless, and liability protection -
a. As provided for in Section 27-2 of the Code of Virginia,
each party hereby agrees to (1) waive any and all claims
against the other parties thereto which may arise out of
their activities outside their respective jurisdictions
under such agreement; and (2) indemnify and save harmless
the other parties for property damage or personal injury
which may arise out of the activities of the other parties
to such agreement outside of their respective jurisdications
under such agreement.
b. To protect the financial interests of each party against
liability that may arise, both Franklin County and Roanoke
County will provide insurance coverage, or a line -
of -credit payment bond, for services in the
amount of no less than $1,000,000 for liability claims that
Mutual Aid Agreement, Franklin County - Roanoke County
Page 5 of 7
jb
may arise out activities of the respective parties. Each
shall provide the other with sufficient documentation of the
coverages provided in the form of a Certificate of Insurance
or Letter of Credit.
9. Liability for damaged equipment -
Neither party shall have liability for any destruction,
loss, or damage of any motor vehicle, equipment, or personal
property belonging to the other party or representatives of
the other party in exercise of any power under or pursuant
to this agreement.
10. Immunities not impaired hereby -
This agreement shall not be construed to impair or affect
any sovereign or governmental immunity or official immunity
that may otherwise be available to Franklin County or any
officer, agent, or employee of Franklin County, or to
Roanoke County or any officer, agent, or employee of
Roanoke County.
11. Commencement of Agreement -
This agreement shall become effective upon execution by both
parties.
Mutual Aid Agreement, Franklin County - Roanoke County
Page 6 of 7
•
12. Termination of Agreement -
Any party to this agreement may terminate same, with or
without cause, by giving written notice to the other party
by certified mail, return receipt requested. Any
termination notice must be given at least ninety (90) days
prior to July 1st of any given year. This agreement shall
continue to be in force from year to year unless terminated
as indicated above, or all parties mutually agree to
terminate.
13. Entire Agreement -
This agreement represents the entire and integrated
agreement between the parties and supersedes all prior
negotiations, representations, or agreements, either oral
or written. This agreement may be amended only by written
instrument signed by authorized representatives of all
parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the
day and year first above written.
Attest:
Clerk
Attest:
Approved as to form -
County Attorney
COUNTY OF FRANKLIN, VIRGINIA
L'�
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
BY:
Clerk Chairman, Board of Supervisors
PROM ASND FORM
J
Mutual Aid Agreement, Franklin County - Roanoke Countye i Lo u,41
Page 7 of 7 1A'd �, Y
A
ACTION NO. -102792-3
ITEM NUMBER D -S
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM•
October 27, 1992
Request to Implement the Comprehensive Services
Act, and Authorize and Appoint members to the
County's Policy and Management Team
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
The 1991 Session of the General Assembly adopted the
"Comprehensive Services Act for At -Risk Youth and Families". The
law is intended to create a collaborative system of services and
funding that is child -centered, family -focused and community-based
when addressing the needs of troubled and at -risk youth and their
families. Attached is more detailed information regarding the
Comprehensive Services Act.
The Act requires each community to establish a policy and
management team that will receive the Act funds. This team shall
also:
1. Be responsible for the development of interagency
Policies and procedures;
2. Establish long-range community -wide planning for the
development of resources and services needed;
3. Establish policies governing referrals and reviews of
children and families to the family assessment and
planning teams;
4. Review the assessment team's recommendations and requests
for funding.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Membership on the policy and management team to be appointed
by the local governing body shall include, at a minimum, the local
agency head or their designee of the following community agencies:
Community Services Board (Mental Health Services), Juvenile Court
Services Unit, Department of Health, Department of Social Services,
and the local School Division. The team shall also include a
parent representative who is not an employee of any public or
private program which serves children and families. Those persons
appointed to represent community agencies shall have authority to
make policy and funding decisions for their agencies. The local
governing body may also appoint other members to the team,
including, but not limited to, a local government official, a
representative of private community resources, a local law
enforcement officer, and representatives of other public agencies.
Representatives from the various valley agencies have met to
discuss the delivery of services and to offer input into the
process of implementing the Act. In 1991, the City of Roanoke
received a demonstration grant to establish its interagency council
as a pilot project in this program for the State. After a review
of the Act, the City of Roanoke has expressed its intent to remain
solely with its own interagency council and with its own group of
assessment teams. The City of Salem has expressed its intent to
establish its own policy and management team.
The City of Salem and County of Roanoke would continue to use
joint assessment teams for the provision of services. This
decision is based upon the political reality that the overall
program is underfunded at the State level and with the concern that
each locality should be responsible for the provision of services
to its own residents. The County's ad hoc committee of agency
heads as outlined in the Act desire this joint program between the
County of Roanoke and the City of Salem because most of these
agency heads provide services to both localities.
The County's ad hoc committee requests that the following
persons or their designee be appointed as the County's
representatives to the multi -jurisdictional Policy and Management
Team as required by the Comprehensive Services Act:
Person
Dr. Betty McCrary
Dr. Margaret Hagan
Michael Lazzuri
Melissa Hays -Smith
Chief John Cease
Dr. Eddie Kolb
Diane Hyatt
Joe Obenshain
Jerry L. Canada
Herb Befkar
(DePaul's Children Services)
John Chambliss, Jr.
Beverly Waldo (Youth Haven II)
Kathy Fusco
2
Agency/Role
Department of Social Services
Department of Health
Court Services Unit
Mental Health Services
Roanoke Co. Law Enforcement
Roanoke County School Division
Roanoke County Fiscal Officer
Roanoke County Legal
Roanoke County Parent
Representing Private Community
Resource
Roanoke County Local Government
Official
Public Resources Agency
Roanoke County Parent
FISCAL IMPACT•
The pooled monies for the delivery of services begins July 1,
1993. There is a State Trust fund which will award grants
effective January 1, 1993, to localities on a competitive
application basis for programs addressing early intervention
services. These grants will be 100% state funding and the
application will be prepared by the Policy and Management Team.
No appropriation of monies is required at this time.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION•
The Board of Supervisors is respectfully requested to
authorize the establishment of the County's Policy and Management
Team and to appoint the County's representation as required by the
Comprehensive Services Act.
Respectfully submitted, Appro,,yed by
Oo�Ni.�Cmbl' Elmer C. Hodge
Asst. County Administrator County Administrator
------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Lee B. Eddy motion No Yes Abs ent
Denied ( ) to approve staff recommendationsEdd x
Received ( ) with chancre in title to y
Referred Johnson x
( ) County's Policy and Management Kohinke x
To ( ) Team Minnix x
Nickens x
cc: File
John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator
Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board
Committee Book
3
Attachment A
Comprehensive Services Act
Hist
The 1991 Session of the General Assembly adopted the
Comprehensive Services Act for At -Risk Youth and Families to create
a collaborative system of services and funding that is child -
centered, family -focused, and community-based when addressing and
needs of troubled and at -risk youths and their families. The law
shall be interpreted and liberally construed so as to effectuate
the following purposes:
1. To ensure that services and funding are consistent with
the Commonwealth's policies of preserving families and
providing appropriate services in the least restrictive
environment while protecting the welfare of children and
maintaining the safety of the public.
2. To identify and intervene early with young children and
their families who are at -risk of developing emotional
or behavioral problems or both due to environmental,
physical or psychological stress.
3. To design and provide services that are responsive to the
unique and diverse strengths and needs of troubled youth
and families.
4. To increase interagency collaboration and family
involvement in service delivery and management.
5. To encourage a public and private partnership in the
delivery of services to troubled and at -risk youth and
their families.
6. To provide community flexibility in the use of funds and
to authorize communities to make decisions and be
accountable for providing services in concert with these
purposes.
In the Spring of 1990, the Governor established the Council
on Community Services For Youth and Families, which was a cross
secretarial interagency council formed between the Secretary of
Health and Human Resources, Secretary of Education, and Secretary
of Public Safety. After an intense study of children's issues, the
Council found that children and families may have multiple needs
and are frequently involved with multiple agencies. The children
are often identified by the system they enter (a welfare child, a
juvenile justice child, a school system child, or a mental health
4
child) yet multiple agencies are often treating the same children.
For some of the children, residential care is the most appropriate
and effective way to meet their complex needs or to protect them.
However, categorical funding, restrictions on the use of funds and
gaps in available community services may result in many children
being placed far from their families and in more restrictive care
than may be necessary to meet those needs.
The proposed service delivery system of the Act was driven by
the philosophy that troubled and at -risk youth are best served by
a community system of care that is comprehensive, coordinated and
responsive to the strengths and needs of troubled youth and their
families. The proposed system is designed to identify and
intervene earlier, provide more flexibility in the use of funds,
provide more community control and flexibility, and to provide more
options to serve youth and their families. The system also allows
the tailoring of services to meet the strengths and needs of the
family by balancing family support and community services with
secure and intensive treatment placement and by having more family
involvement in service delivery decisions.
Funding
Funding for this Act will be provided using 16 funding streams
across four state agencies and the local match currently required
under existing programs provided by community agencies. The four
state agencies involved include the Department of Mental Health,
Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services; the Department of
Youth and Family Services; the Department of Education; and the
Department of Social Services. There are also monies that were
included in the state interagency consortium.
The new act does impose the community's ability to pay in the
funding allocation formulas, which tends to increase the local
dollars required from Roanoke County to receive the same amount of
state match. Under the ability to pay, Roanoke County's share
would be 45% compared to an average of 35.721% today.
5
ACTION # A-102792-4
ITEM NUMBER 2) — CO
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 27, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Approval of Change Order No. 9 and Associated
Engineering costs for the Spring Hollow
Reservoir Contract
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ✓r ���
BACKGROUND:
The Board of Supervisors approved a procedure for approval of
Change Orders on the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project. This
procedure requires Board of Supervisor approval for Change Orders
that will cost in excess of $200,000.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Change Order No. 9 in an amount of $1,186,843.40 is for material
and construction required for additional drilling, grout and
concrete required for the reservoir grouting.
The final quantities of the reservoir grouting are:
38,530 feet of 3 inch holes
25,044 feet of 6 inch holes
4,006 cubic yards of grout
5,401 cubic yards of concrete
The final quantity of grouting is 136% higher than the quantities
contained in the construction bid. However, these final quantities
are less than the original grouting estimates made when the project
was approved by the Board of Supervisors.
In addition to the above increase in the contract amount,
additional geotechnical engineering services were required for
grouting inspection, logging of holes and analysis of grouting
program. Cost of this additional work is $79,000. Staff requests
that the Board of Supervisors approve the additional expense
related to the grouting.
ID
FISCAL IMPACT•
Funds required for Change Order No. 9 in the amount of
$1,186,843.40 and $79,000 for related engineering services are
available within the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project Budget portion
of the 1991 Water Projects Fund.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve Change Order
No. 9 in the amount of $1,186,843.40 and engineering services in
the amount of $79,000. It is further recommended that the Board of
Supervisors authorize the County Administrator to execute Change
Order No. 9 on behalf of Roanoke County.
SUBMITTED BY:
A�' Ap-
"pvW--X'q*
.M.W.
Utility
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
APPROVED:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
ACTION VOTE
Motion by: Harry C. Nickens No
to approve change order Eddy _
Johnson _
Kohinke _
Minnix _
Nickens
cc: File
Clifford D. Craig, Director, Utility
Yes Abs ent
X
x
X
X
X
ACTION.WO. A-102792-5
ITEM NUMBER D -,7
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 27, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Request for Designation of Voting Delegate to
the Virginia Association of Counties' Business
Meeting, November 10, 1992
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Virginia Association of Counties Annual Conference will be held
at The Homestead from November 8, 1992 through November 10, 1992.
Supervisor Kohinke, Supervisor Minnix and I plan to attend this
conference.
The attached memorandum was received from James D. Campbell,
Executive Director, VACo, requesting the designation of a voting
delegate from Roanoke County for the Business Meeting to be held
November 10th.
It is requested that the Board designate a member to serve in this
voting capacity, and return the voting credentials form to VACo by
November 1, 1992.
Respectfully submitted,
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------------
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred ( )
To ( )
ACTION VOTE
Motion by: Edward G. Kohinke No
motion to designate H. Odell Eddy
Minnix, voting delegate, and Johnson
Elmer C. Hodge, alternate Kohinke
Minnix
Nickens
cc: File
Virginia Association
Supervisor Minnix
Mr. Hodge
Yes Absent
X
x
X
X
X
of Counties - Voting Credentials Forms
President
Kathleen K Seefeldt
Prince William County
President -Elect
Harry G. Daniel
Chesterfield County
First Vice President `jIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES
Peggy R. Wiley • •
ir
Greeneville County
Second vice President 1001 East Broad Street • Suite LL 20 • Richmond, Virginia 23219-1901 • (804) 788-6652 • fax (804) 788-0083
William H.H. Blevins
Smyth County
Secretary -Treasurer '
E. Virgil Sampson
S`°"`°°nty TO: Chairmen, County Board of Supervisors
Immediate Past President County Chief Administrative Officers
Steven A. McGraw
Roanoke County
Region 1
William E. Belvin FROM: James D. Campbell, Executive Direct
Gloucester County
Region 2
John J. Purcell Jr. RE: Voting Credentials for the Annual Business Meeting
Louisa County
Region 3
David A. Kaechele
nco County y
HenriDATE: October 8, 1992
Arthur S. Warren
Chesterfield County
Region 4 The 1992 Annual Business Meeting of the Virginia Association of
Marvin W. Scott
Prince Edward County Counties will be held on Tuesday, November 10, from 10:15 a.m. to Noon at
Marion B. Williams
Prince George County The Homestead in Bath County.
Region 5
J. Michael Davidson Article VI of the VACo Constitution provides that each county shall
Campbell
nt6
Region designate a representative of its board of supervisors to cast its vote(s) at the
Brad C. Rosenberger Annual Business Meeting. However, if a member of the board of supervisors
Culpeper County cannot be present for this meeting, the Association's Constitution does allow for a
Region
John D. Jenkinss county to designate a non -elected official from your county or a member of a
Prince William County board of supervisors from another county to cast a proxy vote(s) for your county.
John M. Porter
Stafford County
Region 8 For your county to be certified to vote at the Annual Business Meeting,
Ellen M. Bozman your annual dues must be paid in full and either a completed Voting Credentials
Arlington County Form or a Proxy Statement must be submitted to VAConor to
Thomas
Fairfax DCounity II November 1, 1992. Alternatively, this information maybe submitted to the
Katherine K. Hanley Credentials Committee at its meeting on Monday, November 9 at 4:15 p.m. or to
Fairfax County the registration desk prior to this meeting.
Gerald W. Hyland
Fairfax County
William T. Newman Jr. REGIONAL CAU USES
Arlingfon County
In several regions of the state, more than one candidate has emerged to be
Region
Charles W. Curry y considered for the VACo Board of Directors. We hope that these contests can be
Augusta County decided within the region before the Nominating Committee prepares its slate for
Harper R. Wagner
Bath County consideration by the full membership. Accordingly, we have set aside some time
Region 10 Sunday afternoon, Nov. 8th, for regional caucuses, if they are needed. If your
Girardus G. Ferry region would like a meeting room, please advise me ASAP.
Franklin County
Wanda C. Wingo
BotetourtCounty Please call me at (804) 788-6652 if you have any questions about this
Region 11 process.
Mason A. Vaughan Sr.
Pulaski County
Region 12
James H. Gibson JDC: by
Lee County YY
Kenneth G. Mathews
Washington County Attachments
Representative to NACo
Gerald W. Hyland
Fairfax County cc: VACo Board of Directors
Past Presidents
Jack D. Edwards
James City County
W.D. Gray
Richmond County
Executive Director
James D. Campbell, CAE
General Counsel
C. Flippo Hicks
VACo 1992 Annual Meeting
Voting Credentials Form
Voting Delegate:
(Supervisor)
Name H. ODell "Fuzzy" Minnix
Title Supervisor, Cave Spring Magisterial District
Locality Roanoke County
Alternate Delegate:
(Supervisor)
Name Elmer C. Hodge
Title County Administrator
Locality Roanoke County
Certified by:
(Clerk of the Board)
Name Mary H. Allen
Title Clerk to the Board
Locality _ Roanoke County
VACo 1992 Annual Meeting
Proxy Statement
County authorizes the following person to cast its vote at the 1992
Annual Meeting of the Virginia Association of Counties on November 10, 1992.
a non -elected official of this county.
-OR-
a supervisor from
This authorization is:
❑ Uninstructed. The proxy may use his/her discretion to cast
on any issue to come before the annual meeting.
County.
County's votes
❑ Instructed. The proxy is limited in how he/she may cast County's votes.
The issues on which he/she may cast those votes and how he/she should vote are:
(List issues and instructions on the back of this form)
Certified by:
Name_
Title _
Locality
V
ACTION NO. A-102792-6
ITEM NUMBER I) - 8
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 27, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Request from Congressman Boucher for a Roanoke
County Appointee to Serve on the Not -for -
Profit Corporation Southwest Development
Financing, Inc.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
Board Chairman Lee Eddy has received the attached letter from Ninth
District Congressman Rick Boucher. At Congressman Boucher's
request, the Congress has made a special appropriation of $1
million for a tourism revolving loan fund. The fund will be used
to upgrade local cultural and historic assets to increase tourism
in southwest Virginia. He has established a not-for-profit
corporation, Southwest Development Financing, Inc. to make
available low-interest loans for local tourism development
purposes. The corporation will be controlled by the 23 counties
and cities in the Ninth Congressional District.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Congressman Boucher has asked that each City Council and Board of
Supervisors designate one individual who will serve on the board of
directors. The individual need not be an elected official, but
should possess knowledge in fields such as commercial lending,
accounting, law and the tourism industry.
The attached letter outlines the responsibilities of the members of
the Board of Directors.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Chairman Eddy is requesting that the Board of Supervisors appoint
either an elected official or member of the County staff to serve
on the Southwest Development Financing, Inc.
l
MR
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Edward G. Kohinkp No Yes Abs ent
Denied ( ) to designate Edward G_ Kohinke Eddy x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred ( ) Kohinke x
To ( ) Minnix x
Nickens x
cc: File
The Honorable Rick Boucher, Member of Congress
Committee Book
RICK BOUCHER
9TH DISTRICT, VIRGINIA
COMMITTEES:
ENERGY AND COMMERCE
JUDICIARY
SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY Congrva of the aniteb *tateg
CHAIRMAN, SUBCOMMITTEE ON Aouze of Reprmentatibm
SCIENCE
nbington, 30C 20515-4609
ASSISTANT MAJORITY WHIP
October 15, 1992
The Honorable Lee B. Eddy
Chairman, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
P.O. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798
Dear Lee:
-,9/
WASHINGTON OFFICE:
405 CANNON HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING
WASHINGTON, DC 20515-4609
(202) 225-3861
CONSTITUENT SERVICE OFFICES:
188 EAST MAIN STREET
ABINGDON. VA 24210
(703) 628-1145
311 SHAWNEE AVENUE, EAST
BIG STONE GAP. VA 24219
(703)523-5450
112 NORTH WASHINGTON AVENUE
P.O. BOX 1268
PULASKI, VA 24301
(703) 980-4310
Each of Southwest Virginia's counties and cities contains assets which if upgraded and
expanded could )make 'chat community a tourism destination. Old structures with unique
architectural characteristics that reflect the history of our area abound throughout Southwest
Virginia. Our communities are also noted for their rich cultural heritage which is reflected
in a variety of fairs, festivals and dramas.
If the old structures could be properly renovated and the fairs and festivals properly
promoted, the Ninth District's localities could begin to realize more of their tourism
potential.
My office receives numerous requests each year from local governments and
individuals expressing an interest in renovating and marketing these local assets and events;
however, generally speaking, funds for those purposes are unavailable.
To meet this need, I have established a not-for-profit corporation, Southwest
Development Financing, Inc., and the Congress has approved my request for $1 million as
the initial capital for the corporation's fund. These monies will be made available in low-
interest loans for local tourism development purposes.
I am enclosing for your information a public statement which I issued earlier this
month which fully describes the structure of the corporation and the goals we are seeking to
achieve through its activities.
The corporation will be controlled by the 23 counties and cities that comprise the
Ninth Congressional District. Each city council and each board of supervisors will designate
one individual who will serve on the board of directors. It is my intention to convene an
organizational meeting of the board of directors in December, and I would appreciate your
placing on the agenda of one of your upcoming meetings the selection of an individual who
will represent Roanoke County on the board of the corporation. The individual you choose
need not be an elected official. It would be particularly helpful if members of the board
possess knowledge in fields such as commercial lending, accounting, law and the travel and
tourism industry. I would appreciate your considering these needs as you make your
selection.
The Honorable Lee B. Eddy
page two
I do not anticipate this service requiring a great deal of time. In fact, the board of
directors will probably meet no more than twice each year at a location near the geographic
center of the Ninth District. The board of directors will have an executive committee
comprised of approximately eight board members, chosen by the board, which will meet
more frequently and exercise the powers of the board between meetings of the board.
The board will also appoint a loan review and project approval committee which will
make the actual decisions with regard to which projects receive loans from the corporation.
The board of directors will establish broad guidelines and criteria for the kinds of projects
which should be funded and leave the detailed review of particular projects to others.
When you have selected an individual to represent Roanoke County on the board of
directors please convey that information to my Abingdon office. If you have questions
concerning the structure or purposes of Southwest Development Financing, Inc., please direct
them to me or to Donna Stanley, my District Director, in my Abingdon office.
Thanking you for your assistance with this project, I remain with kind personal
regards and best wishes
Rick Boucher
Member of Congress
Enclosure
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1992
ORDINANCE 10-27-92-7 AUTHORI21NG CONVEYANCE AND/OR
ACCEPTANCE OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL ESTATE OR EASEMENTS
IN CONNECTION WITH THE HOLLINS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Hollins Community Development Project has
involved acquisition by the County of water and sewer easements and
parcels of land for the road improvements, which are described by
parcel number, with reference to the project plans, and by tax map
number; and,
WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the individual
property owners and the County to take the necessary steps, where
a question arises, to resolve and clarify any discrepancies or lack
of specificity by entering into the appropriate legal instruments
for such purpose, which involves conveyance and/or acceptance of
the respective interest in real estate.
THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the
Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real
estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of
this ordinance was held on October 13, 1992; and a second reading
was held on October 27, 1992; and,
2. That with reference to the provisions of Section 16.01 of
the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be
conveyed and/or accepted are solely for purposes of resolution and
clarification, and do not involve the disposition or acceptance of
any additional real estate; and,
3. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to
execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to
convey and/or accept certain parcels of real estate or easements in
order to clear any title discrepancies and to clarify legal
descriptions in connection with the Hollins Community Development
Project, all of which shall be on form approved by the County
Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the ordinance, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
John D. Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
Clifford D. Craig, Director, Utility
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1992
ORDINANCE 102792-8 AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
TO GRANT THE RIGHT TO USE A COUNTY SANITARY SEWER
EASEMENT FOR PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE BY PROPERTY
OWNERS
WHEREAS, Lube Ventures Real Estate Company, L.P., a Virginia
limited partnership, John J. Davis, Jr., and Jones Investment
Ventures, a Virginia general partnership, are the owners of certain
parcels of land located on Peters Creek Road, N.W., in the County
of Roanoke, Virginia; and,
WHEREAS, Roanoke County has an existing 15' sanitary sewer
easement running 5' from and parallel with the northwest property
lines of said parcels; and,
WHEREAS, the property owners need to acquire a 10' private
sewer easement within the public easement in order to provide
service to the properties; and,
WHEREAS, the proposed private easement does not conflict with
the present or proposed County use of the existing sanitary sewer
easement; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the
Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading of this ordinance was
held on October 13, 1992; and a second reading was held on
October 27, 1992.
THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia as follows:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the
Charter of Roanoke County, the subject private easement does not
conflict with the specified public use of the easement, the form of
the real estate interest in the subject sanitary sewer easement
renders it unacceptable and unavailable for other public uses, and
and is hereby declared to be surplus; and,
2. That conveyance to Lube Ventures Real Estate Company,
L.P., a Virginia limited partnership, John J. Davis, Jr., and Jones
Investment Ventures, a Virginia general partnership, of a 10'
private sanitary sewer easement within the existing 15' public
sanitary sewer easement, as shown upon the Easement Plat dated
July 8, 1992, made by Balzer and Associates, Inc., a copy of which
is attached hereto, is hereby authorized.
3. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to
execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
County as may be necessary to accomplish the conveyance, all of
which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the ordinance, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Clifford D. Craig, Director, Utility
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
John D. Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1992
ORDINANCE 102792-9 AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION
OF 13.74 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE FROM ROGER AND
SHARON VEST, AND AN APPROPRIATION OF PUBLIC
FUNDS THEREFOR
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
October 13, 1992, and the second reading of this ordinance was held
on October 27, 1992, and,
WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the acquisition of this
real estate is in the public interest and is necessary for the
provision of public utility services, the drilling and construction
of wells to provide potable water to the citizens of this portion
of the County, and,
WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the acquisition of this
real estate may serve other incidental public purposes, namely, for
the park and recreational needs of the citizens of the County.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
1) That the acquisition of that certain tract of real estate
containing 13.74 acres and identified as Tax Map No. 95.01-1-46,
and located on State Route 221 from Roger E. and Sharon M. Vest is
hereby authorized and approved.
2) That there is hereby appropriated the sum of $50,000.00
from the Utility Fund for the purpose of acquiring said real
estate, and for the expenses of acquisition.
3) That the County Administrator is authorized to execute
such documents and to take such actions as may be necessary to
1
accomplish the purposes of this ordinance, all upon approval as to
form by the County Attorney.
4) That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after October 27, 1992.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. H lton, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Clifford D. Craig, Director, Utility
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
John D. Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1992
RESOLUTION 102792-10 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET
FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS
ITEM K - CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board
of Supervisors for October 27, 1992 designated as Item K - Consent
Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item
separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 4,
inclusive, as follows:
1. Approval of Minutes - August 25, 1992, September 8,
1992, and September 22, 1992.
2. Approval of Raffle Permit from the Roanoke Moose
Lodge No. 284 Fellowship Degree.
3. Approval of Raffle Permit from the Marine Corps
Reserve Toys for Tots Program.
4. Authorization to Pay Legal Fees to Cover Litigation
with Grumman Emergency Products, Inc.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and
directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items
the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this
resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the Consent
Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
A COPY TESTE:
62:±
�4�
Brenda J. olton, Deputy Clerk
cc: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
A -102792-10.a
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER k Z
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 27, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of a Raffle Permit from the
Roanoke Moose Lodge No. 284 Fellowship Degree
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Roanoke Moose Lodge No. 284 Fellowship Degree has requested a
permit to hold a raffle in Roanoke County on December 19, 1992.
This application has been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue
and he recommends that it be approved. The application is on file
in the Clerk's Office.
The organization has paid the $25.00 fee.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit from the
Roanoke Moose Lodge No. 284 Fellowship Degree be approved.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY:
arMary H Allen Elmer C. Hodge
Clerk to the Board County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: H. Odell Minnix No Yes Absent
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred ( )
To ( )
cc: File
Bingo/Raffle File
Eddy
Johnson
Kohinke
Minnix
Nickens
x
x
x
x
x
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO
Application is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit. This
application is made subject to all County and State laws, rules,
ordinances, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted
hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the undersigned
applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under which this
permit is issued.
All applicants should exercise extreme care to ensure the accuracy
of their responses to the following questions. Bingo games and
raffles are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. sec. of the
criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et.
sec. of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County
Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investigation prior to
granting a bingo or raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from
the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The
Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization
found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law.
Any person violating county or state regulations concerning these
permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any person who
uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any
purpose other than the lawful religious, charitable, community, or
educational purposes for which the organization is specifically
organized, except for reasonable operating expenses, shall be
guilty of a Class 6 felony.
THIS APPLICATION IF FOR:
RAFFLE PERMIT k FO
Name of Organization
Street Address
(check one)
BINGO GAMES
KE ���D Sf /,RIO e; /Z / , 11e ttl:s/f
TitW,1 A .U/?ik/i=
Mailing Address /? zo 13e x
City, State, Zip Code
Purpose and Type of Organization f/�,�}TF/I,1/,9�.�dg✓2/i"�t4t
When was the organization founded? /9/Y"
Roanoke County meeting place? ,�j.3 �9T�s,��,q 4,«y
Has the organization beenexistence in Roanoke County for two
continuous years? YES NO
Is the organization non-profit? YES P" NO
Federal Identification Number
Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption Letter.
Officers of the Organization:
President: ,r)9ylt7 /�%,l C/,�/s Vice -President
Address: J:�ee allrltwl3o 1�LL f' OP, Address: %0&71 13yX S/51�2
Secretary: •J Af,4J2/ZY /q9I jl`L Treasurer: el'�gI/
Address: .?zy3 %� 1.b/A�) '/De Address:
Member authorized to be responsiblef r Raor B o operations:
Name: ,4_ , 2�
Home Address ile /6 �/�.Ayr�/S �� �=�•,� �,c�
Phone% - %f�D Bus Phone 77
A COMPLETE LIST OF THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF CURRENT MEMBERSHIP
MUST BE FURNISHED WITH THIS APPLICATION.
Specific location where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted.
RAFFLES: Date of Drawing /ZIAll-9,2 Time of Drawing //,'DO Pl;l
BINGO: Days of Week and Hours of Activity:
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
From
To
From
To
From
To
From
To
From
To
From
To
From
To
2
State specifically how the proceeds from Bingo/Raffle will be used.
List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use
estimated amounts if necessary.
If A/A6 T" �/, 30 0
Al", -FY ��,Q� c � E v s) TO ZZ- O e x-1 7-, D To
e oc eery �iyodJF_ •E�/�/�/1 T)
3
BINGO:
Complete the
following:
Legal
owner(s) of the
buildin where BINGO is
to bibl" conducted:
Name:
Address:
County State ZIP
Is the buil ' g owned by a 501-C n -profit organization?
Seatin apacity for each locat' n:
Parking spaces for each location:
ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1-19
1. Gross receipts from all sources related to the operation of
Bingo games or Instant Bingo by calendar quarter for prior calendar
year period.
BINGO INSTANT BINGO
1st Quarter 7%�'
2 nd Quarter �'r 7 -) 2 0
3rd Quarter /O % _3 9q
4th Quarter f/ 7 'go/
TOTAL '$ 267 )e3
1st Quarter '"Y G' 5 16
2nd Quarter %5 - i O. `. "/0
3rd Quarter �Z632. r'U
4th Quarter "� T'ge' 516
TOTAL ';1 7,::�, S./ z z o
2. Does your organization understand that it is a violation of
law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, association,
organization, partnership, or corporation of any classification
whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or conducting
Bingo Games or Raffles? /'k-_-'5
3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain and
file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to
Bingo games and Raffles, and that suchjecords are subject to audit
by the Commissioner of the Revenue? /I T
4. Does your organization understand that the Commissioner of the
Revenue or his designee has the right to go upon the premises on
which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle, to
perform unannounced audits, and to secure for audit i11 records
required to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles? lc s
4
5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report must
be filed with the Commissioner of the Revenue on or before the
first day of November of each calendar year for which a permit has
been issued? yF S
6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts
exceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an
additional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later
than sixty days following the last day of such quarter? �� S
7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file
financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of the
permit, and no such organization shall conduct any Bingo game or
Raffle thereafter un3-L',3'such report is properly filed and a new
permit is obtained? s'
8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report
must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the
Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle
have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, community,
or educational purposes for which the organization is specifically
chartered or organized, and that the operations of Bingo games or
raffles have been in accordance with the provisions
�cf Article 1.1
of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia? S
9. Does your organization understand that a two (2) percent audit
fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke
upon submission of t annual financial report due on or before the
f irst of November? i =__5
10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid
only in the County of Roanoke and only at such locations,nd for
such dates, as are designated in the permit application? /=,j
11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a
bona fide member of any such organization who shall have been a
member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to such
participation, shall participate in the management, operations, or
conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person shall receive
any remuneration for participatingmanagement, operations, or
conduct of any such game or raffle? --j
12. Has your organization attached a check for the annual pe it
fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke? 7,C --,S
5
13. Does your organization understand that any organization found
in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or Section
18.2-340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is
subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder,
agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the
above to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder,
agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the
above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? Tels
14. Has your organization attached complete list of its
membership to this application form? V f/,C,E
15. Has your organiz tion attached a copy of its bylaws to this
application form? �p
16. Has the organization been declared exempt fro property
taxation under the Virginia Constitution or statues? E,s
If yes, state whether exemption is for real, personal property, or
both and identify exempt property.
17. State the s cific type and purpose of the organization.
F�A%��'%✓�4L �P��.0/TiSip,C
18. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia?
If yes, name and address of Register,gd Agent*
19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department of
Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Ch �ritable
Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code? TIo
(If so, attach copy of registered agent.)
Has the organization been granted an exemption from registrat' n by
the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs?,/Vo
(If so, attach copy of exemption.)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF
SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION.
Article Description Fair Market Value
vc
A
ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE
NOTARIZATION
RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION.
20. Does your organization unde stand that the bingo g es shall
not be conducted more frequen y than two calendar ys in any
calendar week?
21. Does /he
anizatio understand that it is equired to keep
complete rf the ngo game. These recor s based on §18.2-
340.6 of tof V' ginia and §4.98 of the oanoke County Code
must inclufol wing:
a. A rece date, quantity, and and value of instant
bingos purchased, as well the name and address of
the sof such instant bin supplies, and written
invoieceipt is also requ' ed for each purchase of
insta supplies?
b. A cord in writing of the/,dates on which Bingo is played,
t e number of people in tendance on each date, and the
mount of receipts and izes on each day?
(These records must b retained for three.years.)
C. A record of the nam and address of each individual o whom a
door prize, regul or special Bingo game prize o jackpot
from the playin of Bingo is awarded?
d. A complete a itemized record of all receip and disburse-
ments which support, and that agree with, a quarterly and
annual re its required to be filed, and at these records
/Does
e aintained in reasonable order permit audit?
our organization understand th instant Bingo may only
d at such time as regular bin game is in progress, and
h locations and at such ti s as are specified in this
?
our organization unde tand that the gross receipts in
of a reporting year from the playing of instant Bingo
may not exceed 33 1/3% of the gross receipts of an organization's
Bingo operation?
24. Does your organizat' n understand it may not sell an instant
bingo card to an indiv' ual below sixteen years of age?
7
25. Does your orga 'zation underst nd that an organization whose
gross receipts f m all bingo erations that eg6eed or are
expected to exc d $75,000 in a y calendar year all have been
granted tax-exe pt status pursu t to Section 501C nternal Revenue
Code Service? (Cer ficate must be at ched.)
26. Does ur organizati understand that Certificate of
Occupanc must be obtai dor be on file whi authorizes this use
at the oposed locati n?
27. oes your org ization understand at awards or prize money
or erchandise v ued in excess of he following amounts
are
i egal?
a. No door rize shall exceed tw my -five dollars. /
b. Nor ular Bingo or speci Bingo game shall exceed On
Hun ed dollars.
C. jackpot of any nat a whatsoever shall exceed ne
housand Dollars, n shall the total amount of ackpot
prizes awarded in y one calendar day exceed ne Thousand
Dollars.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS
I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set
forth in §18.2 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above
statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and
beliefs. All questions have been answered.
Subscribed and sworn before me, this ""day of �N�912
in the County/E4rty of r (DA &6Q Ir. T-- Virginia.
My commission expires:
19t�`---7i�
&otary�2Public
RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION TO:
COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE
P.O. BOX 20409
ROANOKE, VA 24018-0513
8
NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED
The above application, having been found in due form, is approved
and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of
this calendar year. 1
M-)5- Cl N
Date Commiss oner of the"/Revenue
The above application is not approved.
Date Commissioner of the Revenue
w
ACTION NO. A -102792-10.b
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 27, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of a Raffle Permit from the
Marine Corps Reserve Toys for Tots Program
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Marine Corps Reserve Toys for Tots Program has requested a
permit to hold a raffle in Roanoke County on November 29, 1992.
This application has been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue
and he recommends that it be approved. The application is on file
in the Clerk's Office.
The organization has paid the $25.00 fee.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit from the
Marine Corps Reserve Toys for Tots Program be approved.
SUBMITTED BY:
Mary H. Allen
Clerk to the Board
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: H. Odell Minnix No Yes Abs ent
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred ( )
To ( )
cc: File
Bingo/Raffle File
Eddy
Johnson
Kohinke
Minnix
Nickens
X
x
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO
Application is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit. This
application is made subject to all County and State laws, rules,
ordinances, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted
hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the undersigned
applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under which this
permit is issued.
All applicants should exercise extreme care to ensure the accuracy
of their responses to the following questions. Bingo games and
raffles are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. sec. of the
criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et.
seq. of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County
Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investigation prior to
granting a bingo or raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from
the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The
Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization
found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law.
Any person violating county or state regulations concerning these
permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any person who
uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any
purpose other than the lawful religious, charitable, community, or
educational purposes for which the organization is specifically
organized, except for reasonable operating expenses, shall be
guilty of a Class 6 felony.
THIS APPLICATION IF FOR: (check one)
RAFFLE PERMIT YES BINGO GAMES
Name of Organization MARINE CORPS RESERVE TOYS FOR TOTS PROGRAM
Street Address N&MCRTC, 5301 BARNS AVE. NW
Mailing Address N&MCRTC , 5301 BARNS AVE, NW
City, State, Zip Code ROANOKE, VA 24019-3899
Purpose and Type of Organization PROVIDE TOYS TO NEEDY CHILDREN AT
CHRISTMASTIME, NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION
When was the organization founded? 1947
Roanoke County meeting place? ADDRESS LISTED ABOVE
' Has the organization been in existence in Roanoke County for two
continuous years? YES XX NO
Is the organization non-profit? YES XX NO
Federal Identification Number 540831990
Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption Letter.
Officers of the Organization:
President: CAPT A. M. TRINGALI Vice -President 1STSGT S. WILLIAMS
Address: 5301 BARNS AVE. NW
ROANOKE. VA 24019-3899
Secretary: SGT D. C. FOLEY
Address: 5301 BARNS AVE. NW
ROANOKE, VA 24019-3899
Treasurer: STEBBINS JUBBARD
Address: 5301 BARNS AVE, NW Addrdss:
ROANOKE, VA 24019-3899
601 S JEFFERSON STREET
ROANOKE, VA
Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle or Bingo operations:
Name: SGT DEBORAH C. FOLEY
Home Address 108 CAMBRIDGE SQUARE, VINTON, VA 24179
Phone 342-5976 Bus Phone 563-4979
A COMPLETE LIST OF THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF CURRENT MEMBERSHIP
MUST BE FURNISHED WITH THIS APPLICATION.
Specific location where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted.
RAFFLES: OOD Date of Drawing 921129 Time of Drawing 5:OOPM
BINGO: Days of Week and Hours of Activity:
921129 Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
921127 Friday
921128 Saturday
From 1:OOPM To S:OOPM
From
To
From
To
From
To
From
To
From 0800AM To 930PM
From 0800AM To 930PM
2
State specifically how the proceeds from Bingo/Raffle will be used.
List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use
estimated amounts if necessary.
RAFFLE TICKETS WILL BE TRADED FOR A NEW UNWRAPPED
PROGRAM. ANYONE WISHING NOT TO PURCHASE A TOY MAY
ALL PROCEEDS WILL BE USED TO PURCHASE TOYS FOR THE
TOMS PROGRAM
3
TOY FOR THE TOYS FOR TOTS
OBTAIN A RAFFLE TICKET FOR $1.00.
MARINE CORPS RESERVE TOYS FOR
' BINGO: Complete the following:
Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted:
Name: NA
Address:
County
State ZIP
Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization? NA
Seating capacity for each location: NA
Parking spaces for each location: NA
ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1-19
1. Gross receipts from all sources related to the operation of
Bingo games or Instant Bingo by calendar quarter for prior calendar
year period.
BINGO INSTANT BINGO
1st
Quarter
1st
Quarter
2nd
Quarter
2nd
Quarter
3rd
Quarter
3rd
Quarter
4th
Quarter
4th
Quarter
TOTAL
TOTAL
2. Does your organization understand that it is a violation of
law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, association,
organization, partnership, or corporation of any classification
whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or conducting
Bingo Games or Raffles? YES
3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain and
file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to
Bingo games and Raffles, and that such records are subject to audit
by the Commissioner of the Revenue? YES
4. Does your organization understand that the Commissioner of the
Revenue or his designee has the right to go upon the premises on
which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle, to
perform unannounced audits, and to secure for audit all records
required to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles? YES
H
5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report must
be filed with the Commissioner of the Revenue on or before the
first day of November of each calendar year for which a permit has
been issued? YES
6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts
exceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an
additional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later
than sixty days following the last day of such quarter? YES
7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file
financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of the
permit, and no such organization shall conduct any Bingo game or
Raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed and a new
permit is obtained? YES
8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report
must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the
Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle
have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, community,
or educational purposes for which the organization is specifically
chartered or organized, and that the operations of Bingo games or
raffles have been in accordance with the provisions of Article 1.1
of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia? YES
9. Does your organization understand that a two (2) percent audit
fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke
upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before the
first of November? YES
10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid
only in the County of Roanoke apd only at such locations, and for
such dates, as are designated in the permit application? YES
11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a
bona fide member of any such organization who shall have been a
member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to such
participation, shall participate in the management, operations, or
conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person shall receive
any remuneration for participating in management, operations, or
conduct of any such game or raffle? YES
12. Has your organization attached a check for the annual permit
fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke? YES
5
13. Does your organization understand that any organization found
in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or Section
18.2-340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is
subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder,
agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the
above to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder,
agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the
above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? YES
14. Has your organization attached a complete list of its
membership to this application form? NA
15. Has your organization attached a copy of its bylaws to this
application form? NA
16. Has the organization been declared exempt from property
taxation under the Virginia Constitution or statues? NO
If yes, state whether exemption is for real, personal property, or
both and identify exempt property.
17. State the specific type and purpose of the organization.
TO PROVIDE NEEDY CHILDREN WITH TOYS AT CHRISTMASTIME.
18. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia? NO
If yes, name and address of Registered Agent:
19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department of
Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Charitable
Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code? NO
(If so, attach copy of registered agent.)
Has the organization been granted an exemption from registration by
the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs? NO
(If so, attach copy of exemption.)
ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF
SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION.
Article Description Fair Market Value
COMPLETE DEAnROOM SUITE DONATED $2000.00
BY SINGER FURNITURE COMPANY
A
ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE
NOTARIZATION
RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION.
20. Does your organization understand that the bingo games shall
not be conducted more frequently than two calendar days in any
calendar week?
21. Does your organization understand that it is required to keep
complete records of the bingo game. These records based on §18.2-
340.6 of the Code of Virginia and §4.98 of the Roanoke County Code
must include the following:
a. A record of the date, quantity, and card value of instant
bingo supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of
the supplier of such instant bingo supplies, and written
invoice or receipt is also required for each purchase of
instant bingo supplies?
b. A record in writing of the dates on which Bingo is played,
the number of people in attendance on each date, and the
amount of receipts and prizes on each day?
(These records must be retained for three.years.)
C. A record of the name and address of each individual to whom a
door prize, regular or special Bingo game prize or jackpot
from the playing of Bingo is awarded?
d. A complete and itemized record of all receipts and disburse-
ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and
annual reports required to be filed, and that these records
must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit?
22. Does your organization understand that instant Bingo may only
be conducted at such time as regular bingo game is in progress, and
only at such locations and at such times as are specified in this
application?
23. Does your organization understand that the gross receipts in
the course of a reporting year from the playing of instant Bingo
may not exceed 33 1/3% of the gross receipts of an organization's
Bingo operation?
24. Does your organization understand it may not sell an instant
bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age?
7
25. Does your organization understand that an organization whose
gross receipts from all bingo operations that exceed or are
expected to exceed $75,000 in any calendar year shall have been
granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section 501C Internal Revenue
Code Service? (Certificate must be attached.)
26. Does your organization understand that a Certificate of
Occupancy must be obtained or be on file which authorizes this use
at the proposed location?
27. Does your organization understand that awards or prize money
or merchandise valued in excess of the following amounts are
illegal?
a. No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars.
b. No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One
Hundred dollars.
C. No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shall exceed One
Thousand Dollars, nor shall the total amount of jackpot
prizes awarded in any one calendar day exceed One Thousand
Dollars.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS
I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set
forth in §18.2 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above
statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and
beliefs. All questions have been answered.
Signed y:
Name Title Home Address
Subscribed and sworn before me this 7 ,ate day of 6cC .
in the Count Cit
Y/ Y of -1 Virginia.
My commission expires:
19
Nota y Public
RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION TO:
COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE
P.O. BOX 20409
ROANOKE, VA 24018-0513
8
NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED
The above application, having been found in due form, is approved
and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of
this calendar year.
Date ommissi er of th Revenue
The above application is not approved.
Date
9
Commissioner of the Revenue
ACTION NO. A -102792-10.c
ITEM NO.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 27, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to Pay Certain Legal Fees to Cover
Litigation with Grumman Emergency Products, Inc.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The County agreed to share with the Town of Vinton the legal
expenses for the litigation with Grumman Emergency Products Inc.
over the defective ladder on the aerial fire truck.
BACKGROUND:
In November of 1991, the Board agreed to join with the Town of
Vinton in legal action against Grumman Emergency Products, Inc. and
other possible defendants over the defective ladder on the aerial
fire truck which the County had jointly funded with the Town.
Since this vehicle is titled to the Town of Vinton it was agreed
that the Town Attorney should handle this litigation.
The fees thus far approved by the Board are as follows:
February
11, 1992
$1,151.95
March 24,
1992
1,437.59
May 26, 1992
2,363.43
June 23,
1992
1,779.16
September
8, 1992
228.71
September
22, 1992
868.75
Total $7,829.59
FISCAL IMPACTS•
$941.00 in current fees to be paid from the Board contingency
fund.
1
K -y
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the
payment of this invoice from the Board's contingency fund.
Respectfully submitted,
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
Action Vote
No Yes Abs ent
Approved (x) Motion by H. Odell Minnix Eddy
Denied ( ) Johnson
Received ( ) Kohinke
Referred Nickens x
to Minnix x
cc: Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
c;\wp51\agenda\genem1\kgaLfee
File
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
2
TOWN OF VINTON
P. 0. BOX 338
VINTON, VIRGINIA 24179
PHONE 1703) 983-0608
FAX (703) 983-0621
October 7, 1992
TO: Joe Obenchain, Senior Assistant County Attorney
County of Roanoke
POB 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
JOAN B. FURBISH
FINANCE DIRECTORfTREASURER
Kq
STATEMENT
Statement From
Natkin, Heslep, Siegel and Natkin, PC
For Professional Services Rendered
Regarding Litigation With Grumman Aircraft Company
October 2, 1992 Statement -- $1,882.00
Fifty Percent (50%) Due From Roanoke County To
Town of Vinton
$941.00
September 2, 1992 Statement -- $1,737.50
Fifth Percent (50%) Due From Roanoke County To
Town of Vinton
$868.75
DUE UPON RECEIPT
$1,809.75
MAKE CHECK PAYABLE TO:
TOWN OF VINTON
CC: Diane D. Hyatt
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1992
RESOLUTION 102792-11 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS
HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to
an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions
of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia
requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in
conformity with Virginia law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to
the best of each members knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from
open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the
executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and
2. Only such public business matters as were identified
in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed
or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt. the
certification resolution, and carried by the following recorded
vote:
AYES: Supervisors Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
cc: File
Executive Session
A COPY TESTE:
/&�&Q r
Brenda J. lton, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1992
ORDINANCE 102792-12 TO AMEND AND REENACT
CHAPTER 13, OFFENSES -MISCELLANEOUS, BY ADDING
ARTICLE II, NOISE, AND BY DELETING SEC. 13-31
NOISE, OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE
WHEREAS, excessive noise can be detrimental to the health
and welfare of the citizens of Roanoke County and can degrade the
quality of life which the citizens of this County seek to enjoy;
and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance occurred on
September 22, 1992, and the second reading of this ordinance
occurred on October 27, 1992.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Chapter 13, "Offenses -Miscellaneous" be amended and
reenacted by the addition of Article II, "Noise" , as follows:
Sec. 13-16. Short Title.
This Article shall be known as the "Noise Ordinance of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia."
Sec. 13-17. Declaration of Policy.
It is hereby declared to be the public policy of the County of
Roanoke to promote an environment for its citizens free from
excessive noise that jeopardizes their health or welfare or
degrades the quality of life within Roanoke County.
Sec. 13-18. Definitions.
The following words and phrases, when used in this Article
shall have the meaning assigned to them in this section.
Emergency work shall mean work made necessary to restore
property, public or private, to a safe condition following a state
of emergency or a local emergency as defined by the Commonwealth of
Virginia Emergency Services and Disaster Law of 1973, Chapter 3.2
of Title 44 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, or its
successor, or work required to protect persons or property from
immediate exposure to danger, including work performed by the
Roanoke County Utility Department or by public service companies
when emergency inspection, repair of facilities or restoration of
services is required for the immediate health, safety or welfare of
the community.
Motor vehicle shall mean a self-propelled vehicle including
passenger cars, trucks, truck-trailers, semitrailers, campers,
racing vehicles, and any motorcycles (including, but not limited
to, motor scooters, mini-bikes, all-terrain vehicles and three-
wheelers) as defined in § 46.2-100 of the Code of Virginia.
Noise disturbance means any sound which (a) endangers or
injures the safety or health of any person; (b) annoys or disturbs
a reasonable person of normal sensitivities; or (c) endangers or
injures personal or real property.
Person shall mean any individual, corporation, cooperative,
partnership, firm, association, trust, estate, private institution,
group, agency or any legal successor, representative, agent or
agency thereof.
2
Sec. 13-19. Exceptions from this Article.
The provisions of this Article shall not apply to:
(1) The emission of sound for the purpose of alerting
persons to the existence of an emergency or to the emission of
sound in the performance of emergency work;
(2) Music, bells, chimes or other sounds which are emanating
from a church, temple, synagogue or other place of worship;
(3) Sound generated from school or County sponsored athletic
or recreational events;
(4) Sound generated by activities which are an official or
approved part of any County or State approved or licensed
festival or activity, provided such exemption shall terminate
at 10:00 p.m.;
(5) Sound generated in commercial and industrial zoning
districts which are necessary and incidental to the uses
permitted therein; and
(6) Sound for which a variance has been granted in accordance
with Sec. 13-23 of this Article.
Sec. 13-20. General Prohibition.
In addition to the specific prohibitions contained in this
Article, no person shall make, continue, permit, or cause to be
made, continued or permitted any noise disturbance within the
County.
Sec. 13-21. Specific Acts as Noise Disturbances.
The following acts are declared to be noise disturbances in
violation of this Article. The acts so specified shall not be
01
deemed to be an exclusive enumeration of those, acts which may
constitute a noise disturbance under Sec. 13-20 and provided that
the acts so specified below may still constitute a noise
disturbance under Sec. 13-20 independently of the hours of the day
such acts take place.
(1) Engaging in, or operating or causing to be operated any
equipment used in the construction, repair, alteration or
demolition of buildings, streets, roads, alleys or
appurtenances thereto between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00
a.m. the following day.
(2) Repairing, rebuilding or modifying any motor vehicle or
other mechanical equipment or device between the hours of
10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. the following day in a manner so as
to be plainly audible across property boundaries.
(3) Loading or unloading trucks outdoors within 100 yards of
a residence between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. the
following day.
(4) Sounding the horn or warning device of a vehicle, except
when necessary as a warning during the operation of the
vehicle.
(5) Operating or permitting the use or operation of any radio
receiving set, musical instrument, television, phonograph or
any other device for the production of sound, between the
hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. the following day, at a
volume sufficient to be plainly audible across property
boundaries or through partitions common to two residences
4
within a building or plainly audible at 50 feet from such
device.
(6) Using or operating a loudspeaker or other sound amplifi-
cation devices in a fixed or movable position exterior to any
building, or mounted upon any motor vehicle or mounted in the
interior of a building with the intent of providing service to
an exterior area for the purpose of commercial advertising,
giving instruction, information, directions, talks, addresses,
lectures, or providing entertainment to any persons or
assemblage of persons on any private or public property,
between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. the following
day.
(7) Using or operating any motor vehicle without factory
installed mufflers or their equivalent, on any public street
or road in the county or on private property within a
residential zoning district.
(8) Using a radio receiving set, an audio cassette player, a
compact disc player, or other device for the production of
sound in a motor vehicle at a volume sufficient to be plainly
audible at 50 feet from such vehicle.
(9) Failure to deactivate an alarm system plainly audible at
50 feet from such alarm within such reasonable time as is
established by Sec 16-23 of this Code.
Sec. 13-22. Penalties.
A violation of any provision of this Article shall constitute
a Class 1 misdemeanor. Each separate act on the part of the person
5
violating this Article shall be deemed a separate offense, and each
day a violation is permitted to continue unabated shall constitute
a separate offense.
Sec. 13-23. Undue Hardship Waiver.
(a) Any person responsible for a noise source may apply to
the Board of Supervisors for a waiver, or partial waiver, from the
provisions of this Article. The Board of Supervisors may grant such
waiver, or partial waiver, upon a finding that either of the
following circumstances exists:
(1) The noise does not endanger the public health, safety or
welfare; or
(2) Compliance with the provisions of this Article from which
a waiver is sought would produce serious economic hardship
without producing substantial benefit to the public.
(b) In determining whether to grant such waiver, the Board of
Supervisors shall consider the time of day the noise will occur,
the duration of the noise, whether the noise is intermittent or
continuous, its extensiveness, the technical and economic
feasibility of bringing the noise into conformance with this
Article and such other matters as are reasonably related to the
impact of the noise on the health, safety and welfare of the
community and the degree of hardship which may result from the
enforcement of the provisions of this Article.
(c) No waiver, or partial waiver, issued pursuant to this
Article shall be granted for a period to exceed one year, but any
such waiver, or partial waiver may be renewed for successive like
R
periods if the Board of Supervisors shall find such renewal is
justified after again applying the standards set forth in this
Article. No renewal shall be granted except upon written
application therefor.
2. That Sec. 13-3. "Noise" of the Roanoke County Code is hereby
repealed.
3. That this Ordinance shall be in effect from and after
November 1, 1992.
On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the ordinance, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Kohinke, Minnix, Eddy
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Circuit Court
C. O. Clemens, Judge
Kenneth Trabue, Judge
Steven A. McGraw, Clerk
Family Court Services
Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge
Philip Trompeter, Judge
Peggy H. Gray, Clerk
Michael Lazzuri, Court Services
Intake Counsellor
General District Court
John L. Apostolou, Judge
George Harris, Judge
Theresa A. Childress,. Clerk
7
Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer
R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue
Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff
Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Peery
John H. Cease, Police Chief
John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator
Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
0. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer
Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue
Gardner W. Smith,, Director, General Services
Director, Parks & Recreation
Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement
John D. Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Michael Lazzuri, Court Services
Clifford D. Craig, Director, Utility
Main Library
Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016
Roanoke County Code Book
8
11
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1992
ORDINANCE 102792-13 VACATING AND CLOSING A 50 -
FOOT UNIMPROVED AND UNNAMED RIGHT-OF-WAY
LOCATED IN THE SKYVIEW SUBDIVISION (PB 3, PAGE
80), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, William H. and Norma J. Musselman, the petitioners,
have requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia
to vacate and close a 50 -foot unimproved and unnamed right-of-way
located in the Skyview Subdivision between Lot 10 and Lot 39; and,
WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as
amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption
of an ordinance by the governing body; and,
WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1-431
of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of
this ordinance was held on October 13, 1992; the public hearing and
second reading of this ordinance was held on October 27, 1992.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That a portion of a 50 -foot unimproved and unnamed right-
of-way approximately 140 feet long located in the Skyview Subdivi-
sion between Lot 10 and Lot 39 and dedicated to Roanoke County by
plat of Skyview Subdivision found in Plat Book 3 at page 80 in the
Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, be, and
hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code
of Virginia, as amended; and,
2. That as a condition of the adoption of this ordinance, the
County reserves and retains a property interest in 0.028 acres
located at both ends of the 50 -foot right-of-way for possible
future use as turnarounds should Shirey Road and Eddies Road become
eligible for acceptance into the Virginia Department of Transporta-
tion secondary system; and,
3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts
of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be,
and the same hereby are, repealed.
4. That William H. and Norma J. Musselman shall record a
certified copy of this ordinance and plat with the Clerk of the
Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this
transaction.
On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the ordinance, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Kohinke, Minnix, Eddy
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. Ho on, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1992
ORDINANCE 102792-14 VACATING A 20 -FOOT
DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED ON THE REAR PROPERTY
LINE OF LOTS 21, 22, 23, 24, AND 25 IN THE
ORCHARDS, APPLEWOOD, SECTION 71 HOLLINS
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, F & W Community Development Corporation has requested
the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate
approximately 479 linear feet of a twenty (20') foot drainage
easement which is located on Lots 21, 22, 23, 24, and 25 of the
Orchards, Applewood, Section 7 in the Hollins Magisterial District
as shown in Plat Book 13, at page 73 of record in the Clerk's
Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court; and,
WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as
amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption
of an ordinance by the governing body; and,
WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1-431
of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of
this ordinance was held on October 13, 1992; the second reading and
public hearing of this ordinance was held on October 27, 1992.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That approximately 479 linear feet of a twenty (201) foot
drainage easement located on the rear property line of Lots 21, 22,
23, 24, and 25 in the Orchards, Applewood, Section 7 (PB 13, page
73) in the Hollins Magisterial District be, and hereby is, vacated
pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as
amended; and,
U
2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts
of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be,
and the same hereby are, repealed.
3. That F & W Community Development Corporation shall record
a certified copy of this ordinance and plat with the Clerk of the
Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this
transaction and in addition, shall be responsible for all costs and
expenses associated herewith.
4. That as a further condition to the adoption of this
ordinance, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
shall be indemnified of and held harmless from and against all
claims for damages to any improvements or structures within the old
easement area by F & W Community Development Corporation, its
heirs, successors, or assigns.
On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Kohinke, Minnix, Eddy
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens
A COPY TESTE:
Q.
Brenda J. Ho on, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
0
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1992
ORDINANCE 102792-15 TO CHANGE THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF A 3.09 -ACRE TRACT OF REAL
ESTATE LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF BUCK
MOUNTAIN AND STARKEY ROADS (TAB MAP NO. 97.07-
2-80) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-5 TO THE
ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 WITH CONDITIONS
UPON THE APPLICATION OF PALM HERMITAGE
CORPORATION
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
September 22, 1992, and the second reading and public hearing was
held October 27, 1992; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public
hearing on this matter on October 6, 1992; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real
estate containing 3.09 acres, as described herein, and located at
the intersection of Buck Mountain and Starkey Roads, (Tax Map
Number 97.07-2-80) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is
hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-5, Townhouse
District, to the zoning classification of R-1, Single Family
Residential District.
2. That this action is taken upon the application of Palm
Hermitage Corporation.
3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the
following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts:
a. No driveways for residences shall enter from Buck
Mountain Road.
b. No street developed on this property will be
extended to adjoining property.
4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
Commence at boundary corner 30 on the Plat of Section 1,
"Branderwood," prepared by Buford T. Lumsden &
Associates, P.C., recorded in Plat Book 9, page 351 of
the Clerk's Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court.
Corner 30 being the northwesterly corner of Lot 10, Block
1 of the aforesaid subdivision plat and the POINT OF
BEGINNING; thence along the westerly line of the property
shown as "Property of Lobo Investors, DB 1217, Pg. 483,"
said line also being the easterly line of the property
shown as "Property of Fralin & Waldron, Inc., DB 860, Pg.
305" on the aforesaid plat, run N. 00 deg. 27 min. 00
sec. W. 225 feet to a point on the southerly right-of-way
of Starkey Road (Va. Secondary Route 904); thence along
the southerly right-of-way line of said Starkey Road, run
N. 71 deg. 32 min. 15 sec. E. 110 feet to a point where
said Starkey Road and Buck Mountain Road (Va. Secondary
Route 679) intersect; thence along the southerly right-
of-way line of said Buck Mountain Road, run N. 87 deg. 02
min. 15 sec. E. 379.97 feet to corner 40 of the aforesaid
plat, corner 40 being the intersection of said Buck
Mountain Road and Branderwood Drive (Va. Secondary Route
1960); thence with the westerly right-of-way line of said
Branderwood Drive along the arc of a curve to the right
41.68 feet, said curve having a delta of 90 deg. 06 min.
50 sec., a radius of 26.50 feet, a chord bearing of S. 47
deg. 54 min. 20 sec. E., a chord distance of 37.52 feet
to corner 39 of the aforesaid plat; thence continuing
along the westerly right-of-way line of said Branderwood
Drive, along the arc of a curve to the left 160.61 feet,
said curve having a delta of 28 deg. 18 min. 17 sec., a
radius of 325.11 feet, a chord bearing S. 17 deg. 00 min.
05 sec. E., a chord distance of 158.98 feet to corner 38
of the aforesaid plat; thence leaving the westerly right-
of-way line of said Branderwood Drive and along the
northerly property lines of Lot 1, Block 1 of the
aforesaid plat, the following two courses: S. 72 deg. 31
min. 00 sec. W. 52 feet to corner 37 of the aforesaid
plat; thence S. 17 deg. 28 min. 00 sec. W. 115 feet to
corner 36 of the aforesaid plat; thence leaving Lot 1 and
along the northerly property line of Lot 5, Block 1 of
the aforesaid plat, run S. 81 deg. 22 min. 00 sec. W. 35
feet to corner 35 of the aforesaid plat; thence leaving
Lot 5 and along the northerly property line of Lot 8,
Block 1 of the aforesaid plat the following two courses:
N. 60 deg. 22 min. 00 sec. W. 81 feet to corner 34 of the
aforesaid plat; thence N. 86 deg. 27 min. 00 sec. W. 97
feet to corner 33 of the aforesaid plat; thence leaving
Lot 8 and along the northerly property line of Lot 9,
Block 1 of.the aforesaid plat the following two courses:
S. 75 deg. 17 min. 00 sec. W. 95 feet to corner 32 of the
aforesaid plat; thence S. 51 deg. 55 min. 00 sec. W. 95
feet to corner 31 of the aforesaid plat, a point on the
northeasterly property line of Lot 10, Block 1 of the
aforesaid plat; thence along the northerly property line
of Lot 10 N. 57 deg. 57 min. 00 sec. W. 122.42 feet to
corner 30 of the aforesaid plat, the PLACE OF BEGINNING
and containing 142,056 square feet, 3.261 acres.
5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts
of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be,
and the same hereby are, repealed.
On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Kohinke, Minnix, Eddy
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J.
on, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
John D. Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney