HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/1/1992 - Adopted Board RecordsAT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 1992
RESOLUTION 12192-1 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO THE ROANOKE COUNTY POLICE
DEPARTMENT FOR RECEIVING ACCREDITATION FROM THE COMMISSION
ON THE ACCREDITATION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Police Department was formed in
1990, and since that time, has worked toward the goal of achieving
national accreditation for the Department; and
WHEREAS, the Commission on the Accreditation of Law Enforce-
ment Agencies (CALEA) is a national organization which accredits
police agencies throughout the Country; and
WHEREAS, there are less than 300 agencies nationwide which
have received accreditation from CALEA, a process that subjects
departments to scrutiny of the policies and procedures governing
every aspect of their operation; and
WHEREAS, on November 21, the Roanoke County Police Department
received accreditation from CALEA, along with special recognition
for the Neighborhood Watch Program, the Evidence and Property
Tracking System, the Citizens' Police Academy and for the creation
of the department itself; and
WHEREAS, the members of the Accreditation Team within the
Department spent many hours, in addition to their regular duties,
planning for the success of the Accreditation process; and
WHEREAS, accreditation provides assurances to the Roanoke
County Police Department, and to the citizens which it serves, that
standards of excellence are used for all facets of operation; and
WHEREAS, in achieving this recognition, the Department has
shown its outstanding dedication to the professionalism of law
enforcement and to the safety and security of the residents of
Roanoke County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia, on its own behalf and on behalf of the
citizens of Roanoke County, does hereby extend congratulations to
the ROANOKE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT for its achievement in
receiving this national honor; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors
particularly congratulates the members of the Accreditation Team,
Jeffrey Swortzel, Gary Roche, Leigh Anne Vulgan and Kevin Meredith,
for their successful work towards achieving this honor for the
County.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
ez
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Resolutions of Congratulations File
Chief John Cease, Police Department
D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 1992
RESOLUTION 12192-2 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO
EDWARD L. TRUETT UPON THE
OCCASION OF HARSHBARGER HOUSE BEING NAMED
TO THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
WHEREAS, preservation of our historic resources is important
to the education, cultural enrichment and sense of community of the
citizens of Roanoke County; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley has a variety of historic
structures which represent the lives of the people who settled the
area in the 18th and 19th centuries; and
WHEREAS, the Harshbarger House, located in the Hollins
Magisterial District in Roanoke County, was constructed in 1797,
with a brick addition built in 1825, and may be one of the earliest
homes still standing in the Roanoke Valley; and
WHEREAS, the Harshbarger House has been carefully restored by
Edward L. Truett, was placed on the Virginia Landmarks Register in
1991, and has recently been approved for inclusion on the National
Register of Historic Places.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia, on its own behalf and on behalf of the
citizens of the County, hereby extends its congratulations to
EDWARD L. TRUETT for receiving recognition of his sensitive and
authentic restoration of this historic building; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends
its appreciation to Mr. Truett for preserving an important part of
Roanoke County's heritage.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
yytaAf- �• Gni
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Resolutions of Appreciation File
ACTION NUMBER
A-12192-3
ITEM NUMBER E—'2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 1, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Request for Appropriation to Provide Hepatitis B
Vaccinations for Volunteer Fire and Rescue
Personnel
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
Recormend approval. The County has established a waiver procedure for the staff and volunteers
who choose not to participate in the vaccine progran.
BACKGROUND:
On December 6, 1991, the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational
Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) issued the Occupational
Exposure to Bloodborne Pathogens Standard 29 CFR 1910.1030.
On February 25, 1992, the Virginia Safety and Health Codes Board
adopted the identical federal standard with an effective date of
June 1, 1992.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Board may recall that at their October 13, 1992 meeting an
appropriation was approved in the amount of $33,800 to cover the
cost of vaccinations, supplies, training and waste pickup. This was
for employees only and did not include volunteers. At that time,
staff was requested to bring a report back to the Board of
Supervisors on the costs to cover volunteers and any others that
may be at risk.
Volunteer fire and rescue personnel are not regulated by OSHA
requirements but exposure to the Bloodborne Pathogens is the same.
All volunteer rescue organizations in the County offered
vaccinations to their members in July, 1992. They chose to use a
portion of their annual operating money provided by Roanoke County
to cover this cost. Volunteer fire organizations have been
contemplating doing the same.
Staff recommends that the County provide the hepatitis vaccine,
emergency kits and waste disposal for our fire and rescue
volunteers. This will allow them to reallocate their funding to the
purchase of equipment and other operational costs. This will be
an ongoing program with related costs such as replacement of
supplies, vaccination of all new volunteers and biohazard waste
E -a
pickup. These ongoing program costs will be handled in the budget
process each year.
FISCAL IMPACT•
The estimated cost for this program in FY 1992-93 is as follows:
Vaccine ( 326 x $90) $29,340
Supplies 6,000
Biohazard Waste Pickup 1,500
$36,840
The vaccine figure of 326 includes the rescue volunteers already
vaccinated. The appropriate funding would be placed in the
volunteer account to cover reimbursement.
Future costs will be included in the budget process each year. In
the current year, however, an appropriation will be needed in the
amount of $36,840 to cover the items listed above.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends an appropriation of $36,840 from the General Fund
Unappropriated Balance to purchase the vaccine and supplies to
provide the same level of protection to our volunteers as we do our
career personnel.
SUBMITTED BY:
T. Fu u
F4e an Rescue Chief
APPROVED:
Elmer C. Hodge, -Jr.
County Administrator
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (�
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
Motion by: Harry C. Nickens
to appropriate $36,840
No
Eddy
Johnson
Kohinke
Minnix
Nickens _
cc: File
T. C. Fuqua, Fire & Rescue Chief
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Robert C. Jernigan, Risk Manager
D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources
Pat Bryant, County Health Nurse
Dr. Margaret Hagan, Roanoke County Health Dept
Yes Abs
X
x
x
x
x
A-12192-4
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER 'E: - 3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 1, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Request to Amend the Investment Policy
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: J/,
BACKGROUND:
Investment Policy was lst adopted on May 12, 1987. It was amended on January 28,
1992 to allow greater investment flexibility. Bankers Acceptances and Commercial
Paper are sold at a discount in blocks of $1,000,000.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
On page 12 under Deversification of Funds the maximim total portfolio for these
is 5%. The Auditor brought this to my attention and suggested we look at this.
They further suggested we might want to quadrupile the percentage as our
investments of necessity are kept short. This was lifted verbatim from the
Chesterfield investment policy. Chesterfield has a $100,000,000 plus portfolio.
Whereas our portfolio seldom rises above $20,000,000. The size of our portfolio
causes the purchase of Bankers Acceptance or Commercial Paper to be just
in the excess of 5% at the end of the fiscal year. If we are to continue to
invest in these instrunents, we should revise the percentage to 10%.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Bankers Acceptance and Commercial Paper offer a greater return on this type of
investment rather than a CD or instrument of the Federal Government.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Treasurer recommends the attached :amendment to the County investment
policy.
Altfed C. Anderson
County Treasurer
4�-Z62
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
g-3
----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (y) Motion by: x_ OrIPil M;nn;x No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) to approve amendment Eddy x
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred ( ) Kohinke
To ( ) Minnix —�
Nickens
cc: File
Alfred C. Anderson, County Treasurer
E--,3
(12)
Local Government Investment Pool - State Pool
No more than $15 million
Commercial Paper
No more than 25% of the total portfolio with any one institution
Deversification of Funds to be invested in any one issue:
NO limit- FDIC, FSLIC, Collateralized Certificates of Deposit
No limit- U.S. Treasuries and Agencies
Maximum ---S-% 10$ of total portfolio for any Bankers Acceptance and
Commercial Paper issue
II. Repurchase Agreements
Definition
A. Investing in Repurchase Agreements
1. The Instrument
The repurchase agreements (Repo's) are an integral part of an
investment program of state and local government. Their
flexibility is unmatched by other short term money market
instruments. They provide the investor an excellent cash
management tool.
The sale by a bank of a government security with a simultaneous
agreement to repurchase the security at a later date can insure
safety of public funds while securing money market rates of
interest.
a
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 1992
RESOLUTION 12192-5 OF SUPPORT FOR THE COUNTY OF ROANOREPS OFFICE
OF EXTENSION AND CONTINUING EDUCATION AND THE 4-H PROGRAM
WHEREAS, reduced funding by the Commonwealth of Virginia to
the Extension and Continuing Education program has resulted in the
reduction of the number of extension agents assigned to local
offices, delayed filling of vacancies and relocated agents to other
offices statewide, causing the number of extension agents currently
serving Roanoke County and Salem to be reduced from five agents to
three, and
WHEREAS, the most recent action to transfer one of the
remaining Roanoke County extension agents serving the 4-H program
to the Roanoke City office would further diminish the programming
available to the residents of Roanoke County and Salem, and
WHEREAS, there remains a disparity in the ratio of the number
of extension agents to population served when comparing our local
office and planning district to other regions of the Commonwealth,
and
WHEREAS, there is also a disparity in the percentage of the
local share of salary paid by Roanoke County for some of the County
Agents as compared to the local share paid by other localities.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County strongly supports the efforts and programming
offered by the Roanoke County/Salem Office of Extension and
Continuing Education, especially the 4-H program and its benefit to
the youth of our community, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County urges the State to
properly share in the cost and operation of the local office by
retaining the existing positions and staff, to fill the vacant
Agricultural agent position and to properly share in of the
salaries of all extension agents, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the action to transfer the 4-H
agent from the Roanoke County office to the Roanoke City office be
delayed until the impact of the General Assembly action towards the
projected budget deficit can be addressed and its full impact
towards staffing known so as not to disrupt the levels of service
currently being provided by the Roanoke County office, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this resolution be
forwarded to Dr. James McComas, President of Virginia Polytechnic
Institute and State University, Dr. L. Andrew Swiger, Interim Dean
of the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Dr. William A.
Allen, Interim Director of Virginia Cooperative Extension Service,
Dr. Judith Jones, Associate Director of Field Operations and
Administration of the Virginia Cooperative Extension Service, and
to our state legislators with strong encouragement to carefully
consider restoring the monies necessary to offset the projected
budget shortfall within this program to ensure the continuation of
this service to our community.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution
amended that matter be delayed until after action by the 1993
General Assembly and that copies be sent to Dr. Swiger and William
Allen, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Dr. James McComas
Dr. L. Andrew Swiger
Dr. Wi]]iam A. Allen
Dr. Judith Jones
Jean Vandergrift
John C. Chambliss, Jr.
Roanoke Valley Legislators
ACTION NO. A-12192-6
Item No. _
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY,
MEETING DATE: December 1, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Request to amend the Record of Decision for the
Final Environmental Impact Statement,
Roanoke River Parkway, Blue Ridge Parkway for
Visitor Center site location change.
i
EXECUTIVE SUNKARY :
The Record of Decision includes the National Park Service's
decision to accept Alternative #4 (2 mile Blue Ridge Parkway
extension to Virginia's Explore Park), and accept the proposed
visitor center site #3 for future development. (Please see attached
map and Report on the Status of the Parkway Spur.)
Roanoke County supported site #3 in a letter dated January 25, 1991
to Tom Brown, Associate Regional Director, Southeast Region. Site
#3, however, is not available for future visitor center development
and is no longer considered the preferred site.
To recommend a change in the visitor center from site #3 to site
#5, as shown in the Final Environmental Impact Statement, an
amendment request must be made to James W. Coleman, Jr., Regional
Director, Southeast Region.
BACKGROUND:
The Record of Decision (ROD) for the Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FEIS), Roanoke River Parkway, Blue Ridge Parkway, was
signed on September 30, 1992 by James W. Coleman, Jr., Regional
Director, Southeast Region, National Park Service.
This action concluded the FEIS process and initiated the design and
construction phase of the Roanoke River Parkway Spur. Included in
the Record of Decision were the following statements regarding the
proposed visitor center:
In addition to the park road construction, five potential
sites for development of a visitor center to orient
travelers to the Blue Ridge Parkway and the Roanoke
Valley were also considered. The construction of a
visitor center at site #3 as discussed in the FEIS is
environmentally preferred compared to the alternate sites
6_s
and is the proposed action.
Additionally, the proposed visitor center site #3 is
accepted as the future development site of this facility.
Since site #3 is not available, due to cost and desire not to use
eminent domain, an alternative site #5 is preferred for the
following reasons:
1) with the closure of the landfill by January 1994, and the
knowledge of the parkway extension alignment, site #5 is more
aesthetically appealing than originally thought.
2) cost of these sites would not be a factor, whether on unfilled
landfill, or land held by the Virginia Recreational Facilities
Authority.
3) as included in the FEIS, if either of these sites were selected,
adjacent to the parkway extension, any funds remaining from the
parkway extension could be used to begin planning and construction
of the visitor center.
4) topography and access by way of the parkway extension would be
advantageous and would substantially reduce visitor center costs.
5 ) as one of the five originally studied sites, no delays would
result (any additional sites considered along the parkway would
require a new environmental impact statement).
A visitor center in this region would reach a significant portion
of the estimated 2.7 million travelers through this region,
potentially resulting in increased tourism dollars throughout the
Roanoke Valley.
There is substantial regional support for a National Park Service
Visitor Center along the Blue Ridge Parkway, near the parkway
extension to Virginia's Explore Park. An amendment to the Record
of Decision would make the possibility of a visitor center at that
location more likely.
None
1. Staff recommends that the County send a letter requesting an
amendment to the Record of Decision for the Final
Environmental Impact Statement, Roanoke River Parkway, Blue
Ridge Parkway for a Visitor Center site location change.
2. Direct staff to draft letter for signature by the Chairman of
the Board.
E- 5
Respectfully submitted:
Approved:
Joyc Waugh Elmer C. Hod e
Ec o c Development Specialist County Administrator
cc: File
James W. Coleman, Reg. Dir., U.S. Dept of the Interior
Gary Everhardt, Superintendent, Blue Ridge Parkway
L. H. Hamlar, Chairman Va Recreational Facilities Authority
Robert Hope, Resident Landscape Architect, Roanoke River Parkway
Rupert Cutler, Director, Environmental Education Center
Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development
Joyce W. Waugh, Economic Development Specialist
The Honorable John W. Warner, United States Senator
The Honorable Charles S. Robb, United States Senator
The Honorable James R. Olin, United States Congressman
The Honorable Charles R. Hill, Mayor, Town of Vinton
ACTION
No
Yes Abs
Approved
(x) Motion by: Harry
C. NickensEddy
x
Denied
( ) motion to approve
Site #5 Johnson
x
Received
( ) for visitor center
Kohinke
x
Referred
Minnix
x
to
Nickens
x
cc: File
James W. Coleman, Reg. Dir., U.S. Dept of the Interior
Gary Everhardt, Superintendent, Blue Ridge Parkway
L. H. Hamlar, Chairman Va Recreational Facilities Authority
Robert Hope, Resident Landscape Architect, Roanoke River Parkway
Rupert Cutler, Director, Environmental Education Center
Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development
Joyce W. Waugh, Economic Development Specialist
The Honorable John W. Warner, United States Senator
The Honorable Charles S. Robb, United States Senator
The Honorable James R. Olin, United States Congressman
The Honorable Charles R. Hill, Mayor, Town of Vinton
N
d
c
O >.
=cis
3
d � a
as
d � Y
m 4
a
CY O
4D g IC
Oo 3
am m
ACTION NO. A-12192-7
ITEM NUMBER —
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 1, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Request for Approval to Install a Traffic
Signal at the Intersection of Chaparral and
Penn Forest Boulevard
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Virginia Department of Highways (VDOT) has determined from
accident reports and traffic volumes that a traffic signal needs to
be installed at the intersection of Chaparral and Penn Forest
Boulevard. There has been a number of accidents and two fatalities
at this intersection in recent years, and VDOT has advised that
this location is one of their highest priorities for traffic
signalization. Traffic at this intersection will increase even more
when the County offices are relocated to the Travelers Building.
It will cost approximately $75,000 to install this light and the
staff has identified two possible methods for funding.
One funding method is to ask VDOT to take the full amount from the
Incidental Construction category of the Six Year Secondary Road
budget. This category is established each year to make minor
repairs and improvements. The County has not funded traffic
signals out of this category before. However, due to the high
priority placed on the intersection by VDOT and the relocation of
the County offices, this could be an acceptable method. If the
Board chooses this alternative, we will have to request an
amendment to the Six Year Plan. This option will not require a
General Fund appropriation.
Another method for funding the signal is to use the same procedure
that we have in the past. The County would approach the adjoining
property owners for participation or full payment. The County
usually participates and the project does not go forward until all
funding is accounted for. The County contributed $25,000 for the
signal at Northside High School and $30,000 for the signal at
Colonnades Office Building using this method. I have discussed
this with staff from Fralin & Waldron, the adjoining property
owners. They are willing to participate in the cost of the new
signal, but have requested that the County participate in the cost
of upgrading the signal at Chaparral and Route 419. This
alternative would continue the practice of participation by
property owners who benefit, but would require funding from the
County. Presumably, the County would contribute the same amount as
Fralin & Waldron to the new signal.
ALTERNATIVES AND FISCAL IMPACT:
Alternative #1: Fund the traffic signal from the VDOT Incidental
Construction Fund. There would be no cost to the County.
Alternative #2: Fund the traffic signal by joint participation
with adjoining property owners. This would require an
appropriation of $37,500 from the General Fund Unappropriated Fund
Balance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative #1, that the Board of Supervisor
approve the installation of the new signal funded from the Six Year
Incidental Construction budget. This will not require an
appropriation from the General Fund.
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred ( )
To ( )
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
ACTION
Motion by: H. Odell Minnix
motion to approve using T
•.
VOTE
No
Yes Abs
Eddy
x
Johnson
x
Kohinke
x
Minnix
x
Nickens
x
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
ACTION # A-12192-8
ITEM NUMBER 46-7
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 1, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Approval of Change Order No. 10 for the Spring
Hollow Reservoir Contract
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:Ar-��
.w
BACKGROUND•
The Board of Supervisors approved a procedure for approval of
Change Orders on the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project. This
procedure requires Board of Supervisor approval for Change Orders
that will cost in excess of $200,000.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Change Order No. 10 in an amount of $524,179.64 is for material and
construction required for adding 2,160 linear feet of 42 inch water
line. This water line is required by the State Health Department
in order to provide isolation between the water inlet and water
withdrawal facilities.
FISCAL IMPACT•
Funds required for Change Order No. 10 the amount of $524,179.64
are available within the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project Budget
portion of the 1991 Water Projects Fund.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve Change Order
No. 10 in the amount of $524,179.64. It is further recommended
that the Board of Supervisors authorize the County Administrator to
execute Change Order No. 10 on behalf of Roanoke County.
SUBMITTED BY:
Clifford g, P.E.
Utility Director
APPROVED:
mz
� Kd�)z
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
E-7
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) to approve Change Order Eddy x
Received ( ) No. 10 Johnson x
Referred Kohinke x
to Minnix x
Nickens x
cc: File
Clifford Craig, Director, Utility
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 1992
RESOLUTION 12192-9 SUPPORTING THE SUBMISSION BY THE
BOTETOURT COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF A PROPOSED
ORDINANCE REGULATING EMISSIONS FROM INDUSTRIAL FURNACES
AND BOILERS WHICH BURN HAZARDOUS WASTES TO THE STATE AIR
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
WHEREAS, the Botetourt County Board of Supervisors is
considering the adoption of a proposed ordinance to regulate
emissions from industrial furnaces and boilers which burn hazardous
wastes; and,
WHEREAS, Section 10.1-1321 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as
amended, requires that any locality proposing to adopt an
ordinance, or amendment to an existing ordinance, relating to air
pollution, shall first obtain the approval of the State Air
Pollution Control Board, and that the Board shall not approve any
local ordinance less stringent than the pertinent regulations of
the Board; and,
WHEREAS, the Botetourt County Board of Supervisors has
submitted said ordinance to the State Air Pollution Control Board,
and that a hearing thereon has been scheduled for December 4, 1992
in Richmond; and,
WHEREAS, the regulation by local government of the location,
operation, and management of facilities which burn hazardous waste
is essential to the public health, safety and welfare.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, By the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1) That Roanoke County hereby supports the power and
authority of local government to regulate the location, operation
and management of facilities which burn hazardous waste, and that
such regulation is essential to public health, safety and welfare.
2) That Roanoke County supports the submission by Botetourt
County of an ordinance regulating emissions from industrial
furnaces and boilers which burn hazardous waste, to the State Air
Pollution Control Board, and urges the State Air Pollution Control
Board to approve said ordinance.
3) That the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors is hereby
directed to mail a certified copy of this Resolution to the State
Air Pollution Control Board, the Chairman of the Botetourt County
Board of Supervisors, each member of the Roanoke Valley delegation
to the Virginia General Assembly, and to the Mayors of the Town of
Vinton, the City of Roanoke, and the City of Salem.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. llen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
State Air Pollution Control Board
Roanoke Valley Legislators
The Honorable Wanda C. Wingo, Chairman, Botetourt County Board
of Supervisors
The Honorable David A. Bowers, Mayor, City of Roanoke
The Honorable James Taliaferro, Mayor, City of Salem
The Honorable Charles R. Hill, Mayor, Town of Vinton
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of
Resolution 12192-9 supporting the submission by Botetourt County
Board of Supervisors of proposed ordinance to the State Air
Pollution Control Board adopted by the Roanoke County Board of
Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote on Tuesday, December 1,
1992.
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 11 1992
ORDINANCE 12192-10.$ AMENDING AND REENACTING
SECTION 13-13 "UNLAWFUL DISPOSAL OF RUBBISH OR
OTHER WASTE MATERIAL" OF CHAPTER 13 "OFFENSES
- MISCELLANEOUS" OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY
PROVIDING FOR A CLARIFICATION OF PROVISIONS
AND DESIGNATION OF ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL, AND
AN EFFECTIVE DATE THEREFOR
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia
finds that the illegal dumping and disposal of trash constitutes a
significant problem for the County and poses a significant threat
to the public health, safety and welfare of its citizens, and,
WHEREAS, a clarification of this ordinance in order to more
closely incorporate the provisions of the State enabling
legislation is in order, as well as clarifying the enforcement
personnel provisions, and,
WHEREAS, State enabling authority for this ordinance is found
in Section 33.1-346 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and,
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
November 17, 1992, and the second reading of this ordinance was
held on December 1, 1992.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia:
1. That Section 13-13 of Chapter 13, "Offenses -
Miscellaneous" is hereby amended and reenacted as follows:
Sec. 13-13. Unlawful disposal of rubbish or other waste material.
(a) No person shall dump or dispose of or leave or cause to
1
be thrown any rubbish, tin ea -a-, trash, garbage, litter or other
waste substance or material in or upon and along any public
property, including a street, road, highway, right-of-way, property
adiacent to such highway or right-of-way park or alley in the
county; nor shall any person dispose of, dump or throw any rubbish
trash, garbage, litter or other waste substance or material upon
any private property without the written consent of the owner
thereof or his agent; nor shall any person dispose of, dump or
throw any rubbish, tin ea—sr trash, garbage, litter or any other
waste material or substance upon any lots or property in the county
which have not been selected, approved and designated as a garbage
or trash disposal area by the health department ef-the county.
(b) In the event a person violating this section is known to
the superintendent e€-publie faeilltTes, thesuperintendent County
Administrator or his designee the County Administrator or his
designee shall give the violator ten (10) days' written notice, by
certified mail, to clean up and remove such rubbish, tin—moans-,
trash, garbage, litter or other waste substance or material. Should
the violator not take appropriate action within such ten-day
period, the superintendent County Administrator or his designee
shall, by use of county employees or by employing an agent of the
county, have the rubbish, `i- „-, trash, garbage, litter or other
waste substance or material removed. The violator shall be liable
for the charges and costs of such removal. Nothing in this
subsection shall be deemed to bar the prosecution of any person for
a violation of this section.
W
(c) A violation of any provision of this section shall
constitute a Class 1 misdemeanor.
2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after December 1, 1992.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
None
A COPY TESTE:
-,�V-
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
CC. File
Circuit Court
C. O. Clemens, Judge
Kenneth Trabue, Judge
Steven A. McGraw, Clerk
Family Court Services
Joseph M. Clark, H, Judge
Philip Trompeter, Judge
Peggy H. Gray, Clerk
Intake Counsellor
General District Court
John L. Apostolou, Judge
George Harris, Judge
Theresa A. Childress, Clerk
Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Magistrates Sherri KrantzBetty Perry
Main Library
John H. Cease, Police Chief
Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church
Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016
Roanoke County Code Book
Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff
John M. Chambliss, Jr., Asst Cty Adm
3
Don C. Myers, Asst Cty Adm
Diane D. Hyatt, Dir., Finance
O. Arnold Covey, Dir., Eng & Insp
Terrance L. Harrington, Dir., Plan & Zone
Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer
John R. Hubbard, CEO, RVRA
Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer
R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue
Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue
Gardner W. Smith„ Dir., General Services
Dir., Parks & Recreation
Elaine Carver, Dir., Procurement
John D. Willey, Dir., Real Estate Assessment
Michael Lazzury Court Services
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 1992
ORDINANCE 12192-10.b AMENDING AND REENACTING
SECTION 13-14 "UNLAWFUL ACCUMULATIONS OF TRASH
AND GROWTH OF WEEDS; PUBLIC NUISANCES AND
ABATEMENT THEREOF" OF CHAPTER 13 "OFFENSES -
MISCELLANEOUS$$ OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY
PROVIDING FOR AN INCREASE IN THE PENALTY FOR
ILLEGAL ACCUMULATION OF TRASH AND THE
DESIGNATION OF ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL, AND AN
EFFECTIVE DATE THEREFOR
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
finds that the illegal disposal and accumulation of trash
constitutes a public nuisance and poses a threat to the public
health, safety, and welfare of the County, and,
WHEREAS, the Board further finds that increasing the penalties
for these violations would assist in the enforcement of and with
this ordinance, and,
WHEREAS, the adoption of this ordinance is authorized by the
provisions of Section 15.1-11 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as
amended, and,
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
November 17, 1992, and the second reading of this ordinance was
held on December 1, 1992.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia:
1. That Section 13-14 of Chapter 13, "Offenses -
Miscellaneous" is hereby amended and reenacted as follows:
Sec. 13-14. Unlawful accumulations of trash and growth of weeds;
public nuisances and abatement thereof.
(a) For the purposes of this section, the following words and
04
phrases shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them by
this subsection:
(1) Abatement cost: The county's cost of labor,
equipment and supplies for, or the contract price
of, and any charges to, the county, with respect to
the removal and disposal of weeds or trash from a
parcel.
( 2 ) Enforcement agent: The strge i- rtendent e=
devclepment County Administrator or his designee.
(3) Owner: Any person shown by any public record to
have an interest in real estate lying in the county
upon which a public nuisance exists as of the date
of the abatement of the public nuisance under this
section.
(4) Parcel: Any real estate, or any interest therein,
situate, lying and being in the county in any areas
zoned for residential, business, commercial, or
industrial uses or in any subdivision.
(5) Public nuisance: Any act or activity the causing or
maintaining of which is such an inconvenience or
troublesome matter as to annoy, injure or damage
the public at large or a substantial portion of the
community or a considerable number of persons, and
from which any resulting damage is not specifically
apportionable to any one member of the community.
(6) Subdivision: Any tract or parcel of land divided
2
into two (2) or more lots or parcels, for the
purpose, whether immediate or future, of transfer
of ownership or development, as otherwise defined
in the Roanoke County Subdivision Ordinance.
(7) Trash: Abandoned personal property, garbage,
refuse, rubbish, litter or debris ehr—sem=
inalude an aeetmemlatien ere —.reeds ever f i=teen
(15) inehes--leng, epee y lying ems— any =-par
ee�.
(8) Weed or weeds: Any plant, grass or other vegetation
covering SUbBtantlally a14 a substantial portion of
a parcel which is over f€teen (3:5) twelve (12)
inches long, other than trees, shrubbery and
agricultural plants.
(b) All exterior property areas and premises shall be
maintained in a clean, safe condition, free from any accumulation
of trash and the failure to so .maintain any parcel shall constitute
a Class 4 1 misdemeanor and each day the failure to comply with
this provision continues shall constitute a separate offense and
shall additionally constitute a public nuisance.
(c) Weeds growing on and trash lying en any parcel shall
constitute a public nuisance. It shall be unlawful to cause or
maintain a public nuisance with respect to any parcel. An owner
shall abate any public nuisance with respect to this parcel. Every
owner of a parcel of real estate situate in the county shall cause
to be cut therefrom all weeds and teremrve-herefrem a!! trash.
Any owner who shall violate the provisions of this subsection shall
3
be deemed guilty of a class 4 misdemeanor.
(d) In addition to any applicable criminal sanctions provided
in this code, whenever the enforcement agent determines that a
public nuisance exists upon any parcel, he shall notify the record
owner of such parcel of such fact by certified mail at the owner's
last known address, as shown by any source available to the agent,
and such notice shall constitute, for purposes of this section, due
legal notice as made and provided by law. The notice herein
required shall direct that the public nuisance be abated within
fourteen (14) days following the mailing. In case the owner's
address is unknown or cannot be found, the enforcement agent shall
post the notice herein required at a conspicuous place on the
parcel on which the public nuisance exists and the posting shall
constitute, for purposes of this section, legal notice as made and
provided by law.
(e) The notice provided for in subsection (d) above shall
advise the owner that if he objects to the proposed action of the
county he may present, at the time and place indicated on the
notice, his objection; provided that, within seven (7) days from
the date of mailing or posting of the notice, the owner shall
provide the enforcement agent a written statement of his objection.
At the hearing, the enforcement agent shall hear and investigate
any objection that may be raised and take such action as may be
appropriate under the facts and circumstances established.
(f) If the owner fails to abate the public nuisance as
required, and the enforcement agent finds that the public health,
4
safety, order or convenience is impaired by the maintenance of the
public nuisance, he may request in writing that the county abate
such public nuisance. Upon such request, the appropriate county
officials may abate such nuisance by county forces or through
private contract. Any owner may abate the public nuisance himself
without liability to the county, provided that he does so prior to
commencement of abatement by county personnel or contractors.
(g) The superintendent e # publie-fay s County
Administrator or his designee shall keep an account of the cost of
abating public nuisances under this section and embody such account
in periodic reports with assessment lists which shall be
transmitted to the superintendent ef fisc director of
finance and the treasurer at convenient intervals. A copy of a cost
report shall be mailed to each owner. The copy retained by the
s e i itendent ef f iseal management director of finance and the
treasurer shall be available for public inspection. The reports
shall refer to each parcel as to which a public nuisance was abated
by description sufficient to identify the parcel, and specify the
following additional charges for each such parcel to be assessed
against each owner:
(1) A service charge of twenty (20) percent of the
abatement cost.
(2) Interest at ten (10) percent from date of accrual
until paid.
(h) No more frequently than twice a year, the superintendent
r --
ef develepme nt enforcement agent shall hold hearings at the Roanoke
A
County Administration Center for the purpose of hearing objections
to and comments upon reports and proposed assessments under this
section, of correcting any mistakes or inaccuracies in the reports
and of confirming the same.
(i) Not less than fourteen (14) days prior to a hearing
provided for in subsection (h) above, such reports and assessment
lists shall be posted at the front door of the County
Administration Center with a notice of the time and place the
enforcement agent will conduct the
hearing on the reports and assessment lists, and the superintendent
of deYelepment enforcement agent shall send by certified mail to
each owner, at his address as determined from county records, a
notice of the time, place and subject matter of the hearing. The
notice shall advise the owner of his right to object to, be heard
upon, and to contest the confirmation of the report and assessment.
The notice shall further provide that, upon the confirmation by the
enforcement accent of the reports of
abatement costs and service charges the same shall constitute
special assessments against the owner and the parcel, a personal
obligation of the owner and a lien upon the owner's parcel from the
date and time of the recordation of a notice of lien, and bear
interest at the rate of ten (10) percent. There shall be included
with the notice a statement to the owner of the abatement cost,
service charge and accrued interest.
(j) At the hearing provided for in subsection (h) above, the
enforcement agent shall hear any
0
objections which may be raised by any owner liable to be assessed
and may confirm, modify or reject the reports and assessment lists
as he may deem appropriate and send those confirmed to the
director of finance and the
treasurer for collection of the respective special assessment.
(k) With respect to all such accounts remaining unpaid
fourteen (14) days after the confirmation of the reports and
assessment lists, the superintendent ef develepment enforcement
agent shall cause a notice of the lien of the special assessment
prepared by the county attorney to be recorded in the clerk's
office of the circuit court of the county. The county attorney may
take appropriate steps, including a personal or in rem suit or
action, in the appropriate court to enforce the lien to satisfy the
special assessment.
2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after December 1, 1992.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Circuit Court
C. O. Clemens, Judge
Kenneth Trabue, Judge
7
Steven A. McGraw, Clerk
Family Court Services
Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge
Philip Trompeter, Judge
Peggy H. Gray, Clerk
Intake Counsellor
General District Court
John L. Apostolou, Judge
George Harris, Judge
Theresa A. Childress, Clerk
Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry
Main Library
John H. Cease, Police Chief
Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016
Roanoke County Code Book
Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff
John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator
Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
O. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer
John R. Hubbard, CEO, RVRA
Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer
R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue
Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue
Gardner W. Smith,, Director, General Services
Director, Parks & Recreation
Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement
John D. Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Michael Lazzuri, Court Services
K, 1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 11 1992
RESOLUTION 12192-11 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET
FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS
ITEM K - CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board
of Supervisors for December 1, 1992, designated as Item K -
Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to
each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1
through 5, inclusive, as follows:
1. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Mental
Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Community
Services Board.
2. Request from the School Board for Acceptance of a
General Electric Elfun Society Grant.
3. Acknowledgement of Acceptance of 0.28 Miles of
Forest Creek Drive and 0.11 miles of Millwood Drive
into the Secondary System by the Virginia
Department of Transportation.
4. Acceptance of Donations of Drainage Easements for
Flintlock Road in Connection with the Hunting Hills
Road Project.
5. Authorization to Pay Certain Legal Fees for
Litigation with Grumman Emergency Products, Inc.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and
directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items
the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this
resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Consent
Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Al en,• Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
ACTION NO. A -12192-11.a
ITEM NUMBER K -
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 1, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the
Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley
Board of Directors
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
At the November 17, 1992 meeting, the Board of Supervisors made the
following nomination:
Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Board of Directors
Supervisor Minnix nominated J. William Pistner to a three-year term
expiring December 31, 1995.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the above nomination be confirmed by the
Board of Supervisors.
Submitted by: Approved by:
_-W. ou� "'A/� /'),
Mary H. Allen, CMC Elmer C. Hodge
Clerk to the Board County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (K) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred ( )
To ( )
cc: File
Mental
File
Eddy x
Johnson x
Kohinke x
Minnix x
Nickens x
Health Services of the Roanoek Valley Board of Directors
4
ACTION # A -12192-11.b
ITEM NUMBER /<- P.
MEETING DATE: December 1, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Request for an Additional Appropriation to the
School Grant Fund
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND
Over the past several years the General Electric Elfun Society has
donated funds to the Roanoke County School System for various
designated projects.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
A grant of $1,076 has been received for the purchase of four
handscanners and related software to be used with the learning
disabled (LD) students. The scanners will allow the regular
classroom teacher and LD specialist to make modifications to the
curriculum materials by scanning and importing text to the
computer. LD students will also use the scanners to scan and
import graphics to the computer.
FISCAL IMPACT: No county matching funds are required.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends an appropriation of $1,076
to the School Grant Fund.
C-;&koar
Eddie L. Kolb, Director of
Pupil Personnel Services
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
--------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION
VOTE
Approved
( x) Motion by : —noh I, , ae,, sexi
Eddy
No Yes Abs
�_
Denied
( )
Johnson
x
Received
( )
Kohinke
x
Referred
( )
Minnix
x
To
Nickens
x
cc:cc;
File
Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent,
Roanoke
County Schools
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
I'-5-- Z
FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY
MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON NOVEMBER 12, 1992 IN
THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SALEM,
VIRGINIA.
RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN APPROPRIATION OF $1,076
TO THE SCHOOL GRANT FUND FOR HANDSCANNERS AND
RELATED SOFTWARE.
WHEREAS, the General Electric Elfun Society has
granted $1,076 to Roanoke County Schools for the purchase of
four handscanners and related software;
BE IT RESOLVED that the County School Board of Roanoke
County on motion of Charlsie S. Pafford and duly seconded,
requests an appropriation of $1,076 to the School Grant Fund
for the purchase of said equipment and software.
Adopted on the following recorded vote:
AYES: Jerry L. Canada, Barbara B. Chewning, Charlsie
S. Pafford, Maurice L. Mitchell, Frank E. Thomas
NAYS: None
TESTE
Clerk
c: Mrs. Diane Hyatt
Mrs. Penny Hodge
A -12192-11.c
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 1, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Acknowledgement of Acceptance of 0.28 Miles of
Forest Creek Drive and 0.11 Miles of Millwood Drive
into the Secondary System by the Virginia
Department of Transportation
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Roanoke County has received acknowledgement that the following
roads have been accepted into the Secondary System by the Virginia
Department of Transportation.
1. Forest Edge. Sections 1 and 3 Effective October 30 1992
0.28 Miles of Forest Creek Drive (Route 1951)
2. Woodbridge Section 2. Effective November 13 1992
0.11 Miles of Millwood Drive (Route 1159)
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY:
-A/- AA(—
Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge
Clerk to the Board County Administrator
---------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( Motion by: Rnh T._ Tnhngnn
No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Eddyx
Received ( ) Kohinke x
Referred ( ) Johnson x
To ( ) Minnix x
Nickens x
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
A -12192-11.d
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. Al
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 1, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of donations of drainage easements for
Flintlock Road in connection with the Hunting Hills
Road Project to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This consent agenda item involves the donation of drainage
easements for Flintlock Road in connection with the Hunting Hills
Road Project, over and across properties located in the Cave Spring
Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke as follows:
a) A drainage easement, fifteen feet (151) in width, from
Richard W. Robers and Mary Jane Robers (Deed Book 1329,
page 1772) (Tax Map No. 87.12-2-13), shown and designated
as "PROP. 15' DRAINAGE ESMT." on a plat prepared by the
Roanoke County Engineering Department, dated August 13,
1991.
b) A drainage easement, of variable width and triangular in
shape, from Carl E. McCurdy and Helen M. McCurdy (Deed
Book 1018, page 153) (Tax Map No. 87.12-2-9), shown and
designated as "PROP. DRAINAGE ESMT." on a plat prepared
by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, dated
August 8, 1991.
The location and dimensions of these properties have been
reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of these properties.
Respectfully submitt d,
a-XX.V 111V
Vic ie L. 'H4tiiaan
Assistant County Attorney
t%r— /-
Action Vote
No Yes Abs
Approved (x) Motion by Rnh r,_ TnhnGnn Eddy x
Denied ( ) Johnson x
Received ( ) Kohinke
Referred Nickens
to Minnix
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering.& Inspections
Clifford Craig, Director, Utility
x
x
x
I
METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT; -Ar
COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO "NOT"REFLECT
AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY.
N79' 42'18'
174-05
014,
I
PROPERTY OF;
CARL E, & HELEN M,
MCCURDY
CURVE 'J'
R = 160.00
L = 15.00
CH=N71' 36'501W
15.00
cn
0
c�
c�
o
1
CUFVE 'M-
1
cu
W
R =
a
c
=
co
o�
CH=
�
a
Wi
d
t
x
C5
I—
PROP,DRAINAGE
N68.S
S -q0.1✓
F� INT
TAX MAP N0. 87.12-2-9
PLAT SHOWING PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENT:..
CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY CARL E. &
HELEN M. MCCURDY
D�lT
n o w n A r - n uv RnA Nn KF. rn UNTY ENCINEERINC DEPARTM�
ENT . ,
91
1
CUFVE 'M-
R =
251.63
=
-�L
CH=
7V 3
N74' 7'14'W
Wi
49`92
F
r.
Q�
i
"q•
fU Q,
nig
S
ig 3i
1'=50'
^
SCALE:
ka:
PLAT SHOWING PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENT:..
CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY CARL E. &
HELEN M. MCCURDY
D�lT
n o w n A r - n uv RnA Nn KF. rn UNTY ENCINEERINC DEPARTM�
ENT . ,
91
I
METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A
COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT
AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY.
�-y
RE4 .66
'W
L = u7.00
CH-NSM'39'v
UU2
SS6�
v��s 4SF.
PROPERTY OF
RICHARD W. & MARY
JANE ROBERS
PROP. i5` DRAINAGE
ESMT.
FLINTLOCK RD.
TAX MAP NO. 8.7,12-2-13
2
0
S�3 jz
x Nap e712-2-14
PLAT SHOWING PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENT
CONVEYED TO ROANOKE CDUNTY BY RICHARD W.
& MARY JANE RDBERS
SCALE: 1'= 60'
PP FPA R F'D RY.• ROANOIF COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE. 08-13-91
A -12192-11.e
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. — S
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 1, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to Pay Certain Legal Fees
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The County agreed to share with the Town of Vinton the legal
expenses for the litigation with Grumman Emergency Products Inc.
over the defective ladder on the aerial fire truck.
In November of 1991, the Board agreed to join with the Town of
Vinton in legal action against Grumman Emergency Products, Inc. and
other possible defendants over the defective ladder on the aerial
fire truck which the County had jointly funded with the Town.
Since this vehicle is titled to the Town of Vinton it was agreed
that the Town Attorney should handle this litigation.
The fees thus far approved by the Board are as follows:
February 11, 1992
$1,151.95
March 24, 1992
1,437.59
May 26, 1992
2,363.43
June 23, 1992
1,779.16
September 8, 1992
228.71
September 22, 1992
868.75
October 27, 1992
941.00
Total $8,770.59
FISCAL IMPACTS:
$289.00 in current fees to be paid from the Board contingency
fund.
1
t"5s
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the
payment of this invoice from the Board's contingency fund.
Respectfully submitted,
n, m, V
Q�, -
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
Action Vote
No Yes Abs
Approved ( Motion by Rah T.- johnson Eddy x
Denied ( ) Johnson x
Received ( ) Kohinke x
Referred Nickens x
to Minnix x
cc: Diane Hyatt
c;\wp51\agenda\generaKkgaLfee
cc: File
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
2
TOWN OF VINTON
P. 0. BOX 338
VINTON, VIRGINIA 24179
PHONE 1703) 983-0608
FAX (703) 983-0621
November 4, 1992
TO: Joe Obenchain, Senior Assistant County Attorney
County of Roanoke
POB 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
Nov 0 6 1992
JOAN B. FURBISH
FINANCE DIRECTORITREASURER
STATEMENT
Statement From
Natkin, Hesley, Siegel and Natkin, PC
For Professional Services Rendered
Regarding Litigation With Grumman Aircraft Company
November 3, 1992 Statement -- $578
Fifty Percent (50%) due From Roanoke County to
Town of Vinton
$289.00
Statement From
Natkin, Heslep, Siegel and Natkin, PC
For Professional Services Rendered
Regarding Litigation With Grumman Aircraft Company
October 2, 1992 Statement -- $1,882.00
Fifty Percent (50%) Due From Roanoke County To
Town of Vinton
$941.00
DUE UPON RECEIPT
$19230.00
MAKE CHECK PAYABLE TO:
TOWN OF VINTON
CC: Diane D. Hyatt
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOEE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 1992
RESOLUTION 12192-12 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS
EELD,IN CONFORMITY WITH TEE CODE OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to
an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions
of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia
requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in
conformity with Virginia law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to
the best of each members knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from
open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the
executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and
2. Only such public business matters as were identified
in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed
or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia.
On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the Certification
Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Rohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTS:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
cc: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Executive Session