HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/3/1991 - Adopted Board RecordsA-12391-1
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER-�
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 3, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Design of Water Treatment Plant
COUNTY AD INISTRATOR' S COMMENTS:
-,
�' .ase,-.-•�-�( �� '
BACKGROUND •
The Spring Hollow Water Project consists of constructing a
reservoir, a water treatment plant and water transmission/storage
facilities. The reservoir is under construction and the
transmission line/storage facilities are in the design phase. We
are now ready to design the water treatment plant.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The design of a water treatment plant centers around the treatment
process. All other parts of the design support the process
facilities. In order to meet existing and proposed water quality
standards, the current trend is to use proven proprietary water
treatment processes in order to reduce both risk and cost. The use
of proprietary or pre -manufactured process units significantly
reduces the engineering design effort required to design a water
treatment plant.
In order to comply with the Board's directive to reduce costs and
use innovative ideas to meet the challenge presented by the slow
economy, staff proposes to handle the majority of the treatment
plant design with existing staff.
The Utility Department has experienced, well qualified staff to
accomplish this work. Under this proposal, specialty design
services that are not available from staff would be contracted for
with a private engineering firm or firms. These specialty services
would include: architectural design relative to specifications for
a pre-engineered building, finishes and landscaping; engineering
services relative to electrical, process control and display
systems; and mechanical engineering services relative to heating,
ventilation, air conditioning and humidity control systems. The
design of the Glenvar Pump Station would also be by private
engineer. Staff would handle the process, piping, concrete,
chemical feed, storage tanks, pump station and laboratory design
as well as the site work design for grading, roads and storm water.
Z_/
Staff feels the County can save significant money by hiring outside
engineering services for only that work that cannot be handled by
staff. The Engineering Feasibility Report for the Spring Hollow
Water Project was prepared by Burns & McDonnell. They are one of
the largest multi -discipline engineering firms in the United States
specializing in design of water facilities. The Burns & McDonnell
estimated cost for engineering services relative to the water
treatment plant is $2,970,660. Staff estimates the cost for
engineering design services for the water treatment plant under our
proposal will not exceed $1,000,000.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS:
Alternative No. 1
The Utility Department handle the overall design responsibility for
the water treatment plant and sub -contract for specialty design
services as required. It is estimated that this design concept
will save Roanoke County a minimum of $1,000,000 in engineering
costs.
Alternative No. 2
The engineering design services for the water treatment plant be
handled by a private engineering firm. This alternative is
estimated to cost $1,800,000 plus the cost associated with the time
staff spends working with and reviewing the work of the engineering
firm.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
In keeping with the directive to provide service to the residents
at least cost by the use of innovative ideas and methods, staff
recommends the Board of Supervisors approve Alternative No. 1
whereby the Utility Department would handle the overall design
responsibility for the water treatment plant.
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED:
CliffordJCr ig, P.E. Elmer C. Hodge
Utility Director County Administrator
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
ACTION VOTE
Motion by: Bob L. Johnson
motion to approve staff Eddy
recommendation Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
cc: File
Clifford Craig, Utility Director
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
No
x
Yes Abs
ACTION NO. A12391-2
Item No. Z
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY,
MEETING DATE: December 3, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Public -Private Partnership for Colonnade
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: et
&(Kwc,&O�
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Bruce Hobart, developer of Colonnade, has a prospect for the
Colonnade II building that will lease 37,600 square feet for seven
(7) years and eventually employ 300+ new employees. One of the
issues affecting a decision on the location is ingress/egress to
the site from Route 419. There is an existing agreement between
VDOT and Bruce Hobart to install a signal on Route 419 and allocate
the $75,000 costs of this signal between VDOT and the Hobart
Companies. Bruce Hobart has requested Roanoke County to fund a
portion of the signal costs as an inducement to his prospect under
the Public -Private Partnership Policy. The Public -Private
Partnership Policy allows for the expenditure of public funds for
basic industries such as manufacturing, and for major employers
hiring over 250 employees.
There are several other prospects being pursued through the Roanoke
Valley Economic Development Partnership that would necessitate the
construction of a third building on the site.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Colonnade I and II have an annual real estate tax of $41,734.30.
Public -Private Partnership funds are available from the Economic
Development Fund which has a balance of $100,000. Payback from
real estate taxes will occur within 1 1/2 years ($20,000 for
Colonnade II) if the prospect locates.
For a $30,000 appropriation, Roanoke County would be spending $100
per job ($30,000 _ 300). On a comparative basis, the Small Business
Administration (SBA) requires that a job be created for every
$15,000 of Federal funds.
-Z — =7,
ALTERNATIVES:
1• Appropriate $30,000 from the Economic Development Fund towards
the signal costs for Colonnade II with the condition that a
qualifying prospect must locate there by June 1, 1992 before
Roanoke County expends any public funds.
2. Fund some other portion of the signal costs.
3. Do not fund any signal costs.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that $30,000 be appropriated towards the estimated
$75,000 traffic signal costs. The traffic signal will assist not
only the location of this prospect, but the further construction of
another building. Payment of the recommended portion would occur
in late spring 1992.
Respectfully submitted:
W.
Timothy W. Gub la
Director of Economic Development
Approved:
3� X44
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
---------------------------
ACTION
Approved (Y) Motion by: Harr C. Nickens Eddy No YXS Abstain
Denied ( ) motion to aAprove staff Johnson
Received X
( ) recommendation McGraw
Referred Nickens X
to Robers - X
Attachment
cc: File
Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
9
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P. 0. 80X 3071
RAY D. PETHTEI SALEM. 24153
COMMISSIONER November 4, 1991
Mr. K. Bruce Hobart, President
THE HOBART COMPANIES, LTD.
P. O. Box 28117
Richmond, VA 23228
RE: Colonnade Corporate Center
Dear Mr. Hobart:
a. W. SUMPTER
DISTRICT ADMINISTRATOR
FACS5ELE
This is in response to your letter of October 30, 1991 to Mr. Lynn Whitenack concerning the proposed
aignali7ation at the intersection of Routes 419, 1662 and the entrance of Colonnade Corporate Center.
On May 16th of this year, we wrote you a letter indicating the cslimaled cost for this work would he
$75,000. As outlined In the signed agreement, your portion would be ''4 of the cost of the purchase and installation.
Once again, our estimated cost will be $75,000.
Because of problems associated with subeduling our contractor over a four district arca, it is imperative that
you advise the Department as soon as possible as to your intentions. It is possible that work could begin within two
weeks. If for sortie reason this time frame is not realistic, it could possibly be Spring of '92 before this work could
be rescheduled.
We will be awaiting your response. Should you Have any question, please don't hesitate to call. My
telephone number is (703) 387-5399.
Sincerely,
C�
R. J . Yates
Transportation Technical
Program Supervisor
FOR: L. C. Taylor, Il
District Traffic Engineer
cc: Mr. F. C. Altizer, Jr., Resident Engineer
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1991
ORDINANCE 12391-3 FOR AUTHORIZATION TO ACQUIRE TWO
PARCELS OF LAND FROM CANAAN LAND COMPANY IN CONNECTION
WITH THE ROANOKE RIVER SEWER INTERCEPTOR PHASE III
PROJECT
WHEREAS, a permanent sanitary sewer easement is required
across two parcels of land owned by Canaan Land Company in
connection with the Roanoke River Sewer Interceptor Phase III
Project; and,
WHEREAS, the small size of the lots and the construction
requirements for the project will limit the use of said lots by the
owner, and damage the residue, to the extent that purchase of a fee
simple interest to said lots would be appropriate; and,
WHEREAS, staff has negotiated with the property owner for the
acquisition of said parcels, being Lots 1 and 2, lying between Poor
Mountain Road and the Roanoke River, according to the Map Showing
Subdivision of Tract of land Lying North of and Adjacent to
"Nature's Own Bathing Pool" of record in the Clerk's Office of the
Circuit Court of Roanoke County in Plat Book 3, page 8; and,
WHEREAS, staff has negotiated the purchase of said parcels
from Canaan Land Company for the sum of $2,000.00; and
WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs
that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance;
the first reading of this ordinance was held on November 19, 1991,
and the second reading was held on December 3, 1991.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, as follows:
1. That the acquisition and acceptance of Lots 1 and 2,
lying between Poor Mountain Road and the Roanoke River, according
to the above -reference map from Canaan Land Company, for a sum not
to exceed $2,000.00, is hereby authorized and approved; and
2. That the consideration of $2000.00 shall be paid from the
funds previously appropriated by the Board of Supervisors to the
Utility Department budget for the Roanoke River Sewer Interceptor
Phase III Project; and,
3. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to
execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary
to accomplish this acquisition, all of which shall be on form
approved by the County Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
John D. Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
Clifford Craig, Director, Utility
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1991
ORDINANCE 12391-4 AUTHORIZING EXCHANGE OF REAL
ESTATE ADJACENT TO BURLINGTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
WITH FRIENDSHIP MANOR APARTMENT VILLAGE
CORPORATION
WHEREAS, by Agreement dated July 11, 1991, the County
School Board of Roanoke County and Friendship Manor Apartment
Village Corporation entered into a contract for the sharing of
costs for the construction of a new road over the property of both
parties adjacent to Burlington Elementary School and for the
exchange of parcels of real estate which would be left in isolation
by such construction; and
WHEREAS, at its meeting on Thursday, November 21, 1991, the
County School Board of Roanoke County, Virginia, has adopted a
resolution declaring a parcel of 0.031 acre, which will remain upon
the western side of Barrens Road upon the completion of said 50
foot road, as surplus property and requesting the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County to convey such property to Friendship
Manor Apartment Village Corporation as part of an exchange of real
estate pursuant to said agreement; and
WHEREAS, the County School Board of Roanoke County has caused
a true copy of the aforesaid resolution to be filed with the Clerk
of the Circuit Court of the County of Roanoke? Virginia, as
required by law so that the title to the aforesaid parcel of real
estate is now vested in the County of Roanoke, Virginia; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the
Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the
conveyance of the hereinafter described real estate was held on
November 19, 1991; a second reading was held on December 3, 1991.
THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia as follows:
1. That the conveyance of certain real estate identified as
"Parcel 1" on a plat designated "RESUBDIVISION FOR COUNTY SCHOOL
BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY AND FRIENDSHIP MANOR APARTMENT VILLAGE
CORPORATION" dated February 15, 1991, prepared by Balzer and
Associates, Inc., having previously been declared surplus property
by the County School Board of Roanoke County, to the County of
Roanoke is hereby accepted and approved; and
2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the
Charter of Roanoke County, the aforesaid property is declared
surplus and is made available to exchange for real estate for other
public uses; and
3. That the conveyance of such Parcel 1 to Friendship Manor
Apartment Village Corporation in exchange for Parcel 2 identified
in the same plat, which Parcel 2 shall be conveyed to the County
School Board of Roanoke County, Virginia, for school purposes is
in the public interest and is hereby accepted and approved.
4. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute
such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County
as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance and exchange of the
aforesaid properties, all of which shall be upon form approved by
the County Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. A en, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1991
RESOLUTION 12391-6 AUTHORIZING ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT TO
THE ROANOKE COUNTY RESOURCE AUTHORITY, AUTHORIZING THE
JOINDER OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE AND THE TOWN OF VINTON TO
THE ROANOKE COUNTY RESOURCE AUTHORITY, AND AUTHORIZING
THE CREATION OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
("County") has determined that it is in the best interests of the
County to authorize the City of Roanoke ("City") and the Town of
Vinton ("Town") to become members of the existing Roanoke County
Resource Authority, pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia
Water and Sewer Authorities Act, Chapter 28, Title 15.1, 1950 Code
of Virginia, as amended, ("Act"); and
WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held in accordance with the
requirements of Sections 15.1-1243, 15.1-1248, and 15.1-1250.01 of
the Act; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Resource Authority has, by
resolution, expressed its consent to the joining of these other
political subdivisions to become members of the existing Authority.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That it hereby agrees to provide for the joinder of the
City and the Town as members to the Roanoke County Resource
Authority, and that the Articles of Amendment of the Roanoke County
Resource Authority specifies the number and term of office of
members of the expanded Authority.
1
2. That the Articles of Amendment of the Roanoke County
Resource Authority are as follows:
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
OF THE
ROANOKE COUNTY RESOURCE AUTHORITY
The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, the Town Council
of the Town of Vinton, and the Council of the City of Roanoke have
by concurrent resolution adopted the following amendments to the
Articles of Incorporation of the Roanoke County Resource Authority
of Virginia, pursuant to the Virginia Water and Sewer Authorities
Act (Chapter 28, Title 15.1, 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended)
("Act"):
(1) The name of the Authority shall be the Roanoke
Valley Resource Authority and the address of its principal office
is 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798.
(2) The names of the incorporating political subdivi-
sions are the County of Roanoke, Virginia; the City of Roanoke,
Virginia; and the Town of Vinton, Virginia. The County of Roanoke,
the City of Roanoke, and the Town of Vinton, as the incorporating
political subdivisions, hereby acknowledge, covenant, and agree
that these Articles of Incorporation shall not be further amended
or changed without the express agreement of each of the governing
bodies of each of the incorporating political subdivisions.
Neither of the following actions shall be taken or
permitted to occur by the Authority without the consent of the City
of Roanoke and the County of Roanoke as expressed by the affirma-
tive vote of all City and County representatives on the Authority:
2
(a) Any change in the terms or conditions of design
or operation of the Transfer Station located in the City of Roanoke
as set forth in the Solid Waste Transfer Facility Design Criteria,
dated March 19, 1991, and the Solid Waste Transfer Facility
Operating Criteria, dated May 21, 1991, as approved by the Roanoke
City Planning Commission on June 5, 1991, and the Part A and Part
B applications for the Transfer Station as approved by the
Commonwealth of Virginia, or any expansion or modification thereof
or use by any persons or entities other than City, County, or Town;
(b) Any change in the terms and conditions of the
design or operation of the Landfill located in Roanoke County as
set forth in the special use permit and the Landfill Permit
Conditions and Operating Policies, Action 62789-10 and Resolution
62789-12, each dated June 27, 1989, and the Part A and Part B
applications for the Landfill as approved by the Commonwealth of
Virginia.
Since the Landfill and Transfer Station are scarce and
valuable resources, and because the incorporating political
subdivisions have a common interest in insuring that the Landfill
is utilized in the best possible and most efficient manner, the
incorporating political subdivisions agree that Authority member-
ship and operation and use and operation of the Transfer Station
and Landfill shall be governed by the terms and conditions of the
Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Members Use Agreement ("Use
Agreement") dated October 23, 1991.
(3) The names, addresses, and terms of office of the
members of the Board of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority
("Authority") are as follows:
1. Gardner W. Smith
effective on the date of issuance of a certificate of joinder for
the Authority by the State Corporation Commission in accordance
with the provisions of Section 15.1-1248 of the Act. The governinq
body of each participating political subdivision shall appoint the
number of members, who may be members of the governing body, set
forth opposite its name below:
County of Roanoke - four
City of Roanoke - two
4
P. O. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018
Term
Expires:
12/31/95
2.
Diane D. Hyatt
P. O. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018
Term
Expires:
12/31/94
3.
John R. Hubbard
P. O. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018
Term
Expires:
12/31/93
4.
Mikeiel T. Wimmer
3878 Harborwood Road
Salem, VA 24153
Term
Expires:
12/31/93
5.
Kit B. Kiser
Room 354, Municipal
Bldg.
Roanoke, VA 24011
Term
Expires:
12/31/94
6.
Joel M. Schlanger
Room 461, Municipal
Bldg.
Roanoke, VA 24011
Term
Expires:
12/31/95
7.
S. Bradley Corcoran
P. O. Box 338
Vinton, VA 24179
Term
Expires:
12/31/95
The terms
of office of each of the
members
shall become
effective on the date of issuance of a certificate of joinder for
the Authority by the State Corporation Commission in accordance
with the provisions of Section 15.1-1248 of the Act. The governinq
body of each participating political subdivision shall appoint the
number of members, who may be members of the governing body, set
forth opposite its name below:
County of Roanoke - four
City of Roanoke - two
4
Town of Vinton - one
It being the intention of these Articles that the
governing body of the County of Roanoke shall always appoint a
majority of the members, whenever an additional political subdivi-
sion shall join the Authority, such governing body shall be
entitled to appoint one or more additional members in order to
maintain such majority.
Initially, the governing body of the County of Roanoke
shall appoint one member for a four-year term, one member for a
three-year term, and two members for a two-year term. Initially,
the governing body of the City of Roanoke shall appoint one member
for a four-year term and one member for a three-year term.
Initially, the governing body of the Town of Vinton shall appoint
one member for a four-year term. After the initial terms, each
member shall be appointed for a four-year term or until his
successor is appointed and qualified. Any additional members
appointed by the County of Roanoke to maintain its majority
pursuant to the foregoing paragraph shall also be appointed for
four-year terms. The governing body of each political subdivision
shall be empowered to remove at any time, without cause, any member
appointed by it and appoint a successor member to fill the
unexpired portion of the removed member's term.
Each member may be reimbursed by the Authority for the
amount of actual expenses incurred by him in the performance of his
duties.
5
(4) The purpose for which the Authority is to be formed
is to exercise all the powers granted to the Authority to acquire,
finance, construct, operate, manage and maintain a garbage and
refuse collection and disposal system and related facilities
pursuant to the Act. For purposes of these Articles, and any
contracts or documents entered into on behalf of Authority,
"garbage and refuse collection and disposal system and related
facilities" shall mean collection and disposal of garbage and
refuse at and through a transfer facility owned and operated by the
Authority and the associated landfill or disposal operations only.
The Authority shall not be authorized to engage in or provide for
individual residential or business collection activities or
services. The Authority shall contract with the County of Roanoke
and the City of Roanoke to furnish garbage and refuse collection
and disposal services upon identical terms and conditions including
the same schedule of service rates, fees and charges of all types
which shall be uniformly applicable to both such political
subdivisions. Subject to the terms of the Use Agreement, the
Authority may contract with other political subdivisions to furnish
garbage and trash disposal services upon such terms and conditions
as the Authority shall determine. The Authority may contract to
make host locality payments to Roanoke County and Roanoke City to
compensate the County and City in consideration of location of
facilities within their communities. It is not practicable to set
forth herein information regarding preliminary estimates of capital
C.
costs, proposals for specific projects to be undertaken, or initial
rates for the proposed projects.
(5) The Authority shall serve the County of Roanoke, the
City of Roanoke, the Town of Vinton and, to the extent permitted
by the Act and by the terms of these Articles and the Use
Agreement, such other public or private entities as the Authority
may determine upon the terms and conditions established pursuant
to such contracts.
(6) The Authority shall cause an annual audit of its
books and records to be made by the State Auditor of Public
Accounts or by an independent certified public accountant at the
end of each fiscal year and a certified copy thereof to be filed
promptly with the governing body of each of the incorporating
political subdivisions.
3. That the County hereby ratifies and confirms the findings
made on June 141 1989, as follows:
(i) Privately -owned sanitary landfill services are not
available in a reasonable and cost efficient manner, and
(ii) Operation by the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority
of a sanitary landfill and any related facilities or the contract
for such operation in spite of any potential anti-competitive
effect is important to provide for the development and/or operation
of a regional system of garbage and refuse collection and disposal
for the County of Roanoke, the City of Roanoke, and the Town of
Vinton and such other governmental units or private entities as the
Authority may determine.
VA
4. That this resolution shall take effect immediately upon
its adoption.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council
Carolyn S. Ross, Clerk, Vinton Town Council
Jeffrey A. Cromer, Roanoke Valley Reg. Solid Waste Mgt Board
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Gardner W. Smith, Director, General Services
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
Mikeiel T. Wimmer, 3878 Harborwood Road, Salem, VA 24153
8
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1991
RESOLUTION 12391-7 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE
PERMIT AND AMENDING CONDITIONS AND OPERATING
POLICIES TO THE ROANOKE COUNTY RESOURCE
AUTHORITY FOR THE SMITH GAP SOLID WASTE
DISPOSAL FACILITY, LOCATED IN THE CATAWBA
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public
hearing on this matter on November 7, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, held a public hearing on this matter on November 19,
1991; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Board finds that the granting of amendments to
the Special Exception Permit conditions and operating policies for
the solid waste disposal facility at the Smith Gap site is
substatially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan
pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code
of Virginia, as amended.
2. That this action is taken upon the petition of the
Roanoke County Resource Authority.
3. That this action amends the Resolution 62789-12 of this
Board adopted on June 27, 1989.
4. That the Board hereby grants a Special Exception Permit
to the Roanoke County Resource Authority (and upon its creation and
1
approval by the State Corporation Commission, its successor, the
Roanoke Valley Resource Authority) to publicly own and operate a
solid waste disposal facility on what is known as the "Smith Gap
Site" located on 640.39 acres on the northwest side of Fort Lewis
Mountain between Smith Gap and Bradshaw Road in the Catawba
Magisterial District, subject to the amended landfill permit
conditions and operating policies, which are attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference.
5. That the Board acknowledges, to the extent permitted by
law, that the Authority has a non-binding moral obligation to pay
such amounts as may be needed to address the adopted operating
policies, including property value protection, and that such
payment is subject to future appropriations. Nothing in the
approved operating policies shall be deemed to constitute the
creation of a debt, the lending of the credit, nor a pledge of the
credit of the County under the Constitution and laws of the
Commonwealth of Virginia, nor shall any provision thereof give any
person any legal right to enforce the terms thereof against the
County or the Authority.
6. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect
thirty (30) days after its final passage. All resolutions or
parts of resolutions in conflict with the provisions of this
resolution be, and the same hereby are, repealed.
On motion of Supervisor Robers to adopt the ordinance amending
the corridor to provide protection to 1800 feet contiguous to rail
line with protection extending only to current residents and
OAI
existing improvements and provided that further constuction is
exempt from protection, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Supervisor Eddy
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. 7illen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1991
RESOLUTION 12391-8 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET
FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS
ITEM R - CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board
of Supervisors for December 3, 1991, designated as Item K -
Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to
each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1
through 3, inclusive, as follows:
1. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Court
Community Corrections Policy Board, Mental Health
Services of the Roanoke Valley Board of Directors,
and Planning Commission.
2. Request for acceptance of the extension of
Valleypointe Parkway into the Virginia Department
of Transportation Secondary System.
3. Acceptance of Sanitary Sewer Facilities serving
Roanoke Retirement Community (Elm Park Estates)
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and
directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items
the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this
resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to approve the resolution,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. A en, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Clifford Craig, Director, Utility
ACTION NO. A -12391-8.a
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 3, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the
Court Community Corrections Policy Board,
Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley
Board of Directors and Planning Commission
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The following nominations were made at the November 19, 1991
meeting, and are offered for confirmation.
Court Community Corrections Policy Board
Supervisor Eddy nominated Supervisor Harry C. Nickens to another
three-year term which will expire December 31, 1994.
Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Board of Directors
Supervisor Robers nominated Rita J. Gliniecki to another three-
year term which will expire December 31, 1994.
Planning Commission
Supervisor Robers nominated Donald R. Witt to another four-year
term which will expire December 31, 1995.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the above nominations be confirmed by the
Board of Supervisors.
Respectfully Submitted by:
Mary H. Allen
Clerk to the Board
Approved by:
64
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
---------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Bob T. Johnson No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Eddy x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred ( ) McGraw x
To ( ) Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Court Community Corections Policy Board File
Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Board of Directors File
Planning Commission File
CORRECTED ON 1/16/92, PARAGRAPH 2, 100 FT RIGHT-OF-WAY
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1991
RESOLUTION 12391-8.b REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
THE EXTENSION OF VALLEYPOINTE PARKWAY
INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Valleypointe
Parkway from its intersection with Concourse Drive to its
intersection with Wood Haven Road, for a distance of 0.17 miles to
be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State
Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and
a one hundred (100) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore
been dedicated by virtue of a certain map\maps known as
Valleypointe which map was recorded in Plat Book 13, Page 79, of
the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
County, Virginia, on April 11, 1991 and that by reason of the
recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor
consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said drainage
easements and a one hundred (100) foot right-of-way for streets.
3. That said road known as Valleypointe Parkway and which
is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and
the same is hereby established as a public road to become a part
of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only
from and after notification of official acceptance of said street
or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
cc: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
George Simpson, Assistant Director, Engineering, and
copy for Virginia Department of Transportation
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of
Resolution 12391-8.b requesting the acceptance of the extension of
Valleypointe Parkway into the Virginia Department of Transportation
Secondary Road System adopted by the Roanoke County Board of
Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote on December 3, 1991.
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
A -12391-8.c
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER I '�
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 3, 1991
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving
Roanoke Retirement Community (Elm Park Estates)
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION•
The Developers of Roanoke Retirement Community (Elm Park Estates),
Holiday Retirement Associates, Limited Partnership, have requested
that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the sanitary sewer
facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary
easements.
The sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by
Richard L. Williams, Consulting Engineers entitled Roanoke
Retirement Community (Elm Park Estates), dated March 221 1991,
which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The
sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and
the plans approved by the County.
FISCAL IMPACT•
The value of the sanitary sewer construction is $37,000.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the sanitary
sewer facilities serving Roanoke Retirement Community (Elm Park
Estates) along with all necessary easements, and authorize the
County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these
facilities.
SUBMITTED BY:
Cliffor ig, P.E.
Utility Director
APPROVED:
Elmer C. Hodge'
County Administrator
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Eddy x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
to Nickens
x
Robers x
cc: File
Clifford Craig, Director, Utility
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
A
v v
6EU�AH TS �aM OUTHO
awi. ti 40
..
1 rl r ' b i�4s GM/
wraywJ�ruTdt �i+
N q rILRrQi:�
,..r'_ PMQ'CT'.'
a_vo axti ' ca+., oc O'sauvlr"d o°E,r,, b; s
AMIm
4, 77 J�4v� ? Y y �
\1'-- (s a YIL //J
VICINITY MAP
NORTH
mm ..
MOON\ Y
— — -
or a..t•w e.o. ?�. . � Ir �r l� �
� � r.n• � � `lyse_ '
wwr ell
t4 N � .p `�T eta~is .ter ...-ar�...K� � ..y• v.vr.
w.w. Jt.:ti ✓tev... N.. w ht.Vnw \ � �• trt ^�
AP
, *...C'`U"Y.x z.�L ,{yt, �r• • '�.e,?'�R... , � .i: y \ \; I
` � M
Y+y
at a IM° ` y • `�• . _ — �L..' .1y,;,. \ .y..'w v .
1\,•' YA l/' 4' '� Yea �\\
J "•� `\spa � � . s+.""v'.ta""iu �/ Y r
rRA. .r � ♦ �.
j
I f � rr
r..*
r
=-I S GNAL n,,C J -1L„ -Y SLAV \� 1 ivr-
ITr.
'YWUL =•Qe LW! MAR1CIr16FA
I ROv” L w_
wawa
�lslxnHc uMcu
.R0M10t� wti
ENGIIVESMG ACCEPTANCE OF SEWER FACILITIES SERVING
ROANOKE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY (ELM PARK ESTATES)
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1991
RESOLUTION 12391-9 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS
HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant
to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the
provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia
requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in
conformity with Virginia law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to
the best of each members knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from
open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the
executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and
2. Only such public business matters as were identified
in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed
or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Robers
A COPY TESTE:
j
Mary H Allen, Clerk
CC: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Executive Session
Action No. A-12391-10
Item No. (L
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY, CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 31 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Work session
- East Circumferential
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'B COMMENTS;
Ne �j�►c7 or/�.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Virginia Department of Transportation
construction of the East Roanoke Circumferential OT) is too pro ng the
connecting route between Interstate I-81 northeast of Roanoke to
Route 220 south of Roanoke. Provide a
alternatives that varyThe corridor comprises several
(See attached page 1 from 16.2 miles to 20.5 miles in length.
estimated costs P g 14 from the VDOT brochure) with various
There are four alternative routes, a NO BUILD alternative, a
Transportation Systems Managementalternative
Transit alternative under consideration through the Location Public
Hearing Process.
A series of location public meetings were held (November 19-21 as
well as a public hearing (November 21 )
noted
Opposition as to the construction for the •Circumfer ntial.citizen
The County staff has participated through the Economic Development
(ED) Team and reviewed the various alternatives.
concerns about the total Staff has
co
Protect the identified right of wastsy for an inability of VDOT to
exclusion of the Blue Ridge Parkway corridorasalternative
a t alid alternative
route.
Staff is of the opinion that several sem
ents of the
routes should be reviewed and analyzed asbeing viable alternate
projects
that would relieve congestion on I-581.
These are the and extension of Route 115 (Plantation Road) between construction
Road and Route 460 and the construction of Alternate Route 2208 r
Route 460. This latter project is a to
truck traffic on Route 604. Priority need to alleviate
as discus
of alternate Route 220 with otet urt Count sed the construction
Williamson and he advises that this route is John
Botetourt County also. priority for
6-1
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Select the NO BUILD alternative but request VDOT to analyze
the 115 and Alternate 220 segments as construction
alternatives.
2. Select an Alternate Route (6, 7, 8, or 9).
Respectfully submitted:
Timothy W Gubala, Director
Economic evelopment
Approved by:
4�
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
--------------------
Approved ACTION ----"""
(� Motion by: Harry C. Nickens Eddy NO Yes Abs
Denied ( ) motion to support "No Build" Johnson Abstain
Received ( ) _Ption _�
Referred McGraw _.c
to Nickens
Robers Absent
Attachment
cc: File
Fred Altizer, Resident Engineer, VDOT
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Roanoke Area L
egislators
Steve Musselwhite, Transportation Board