HomeMy WebLinkAbout1/21/1990 - Adopted Board RecordsAT AN ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY , VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE HOLIDAY INN-TANGLEWOOD
ON SUNDAY, JANUARY 21, 1990
RESOLUTION 12190-1 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING
WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF
VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant
to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the
provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia
requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia that such executive meeting was conducted in
conformity with Virginia Law.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia hereby certifies that, to
the best of each members knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from
open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the
executive meeting which this certification resolution applies,
and
2. Only such public business matters as were identified
in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard,
discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson and upon the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Eddy, Robers
NAYS: Supervisor Nickens
A COPY TEST:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
CC: File
Executive Session File
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990
ORDINANCE NO. 12390-1 AMENDING AND REENACTING
THE 1989-90 APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE BY
TRANSFERRING CAPITAL OUTLAY FUNDS FOR
EMERGENCY RESPONSE VEHICLES AND ASSOCIATED
EQUIPMENT
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
approved the annual budget for Roanoke County for fiscal year 1989-
90, after public hearing and first and second readings of the
ordinance on June 14, 1989, pursuant to the provisions of Section
18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter; and
WHEREAS, the capital outlay portion of this budget provides
for the sum of $189,934 to be expended for emergency response
vehicles and associated equipment for the Roanoke County Sheriff's
Department; and
WHEREAS, the voters of Roanoke County by referendum conducted
on November 7, 1989, approved the creation of a County Police Force
pursuant to Section 15.1-131.6:1 and the County has requested
legislation from the General Assembly to authorize the creation
and funding of such police force not later than July 1, 1990; and
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, to insure that the sum of $189,934 be
expended for emergency response vehicles and associated equipment
to serve the law enforcement needs of the citizens of Roanoke
County.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That Ordinance No. 61489-9 appropriating funds for the
1989-90 fiscal year budget for Roanoke County, Virginia, is amended
and reenacted as follows:
Funds related to the purchase of emergency response vehicles
and associated equipment are being transferred from the Sheriff's
Department and reappropriated to a new department for the Police
Department. These funds, as stated in the original budget
ordinance, are being transferred as follows:
Policing and Investigation Capital
(Sheriff's Department)
Uniform Division ($171,967)
Criminal Investigation Division ( 8,984)
Services Division ( 8,983)
Police Department
Uniform Division $171,967
Criminal Investigation Division 8,984
Services Division 8,983
2. That an emergency exists therefore the second reading of
this ordinance has been dispensed with by the affirmative vote of
four-fifths of the members of the Board. The effective date of
this ordinance shall be January 23, 1990.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens and upon the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS: None.
A copy - teste:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
cc: File
Sheriff Michael Kavanaugh
Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Jack Council, Director, Procurement
ACTION NO. A-12390-2
ITEM NO. -7) - `3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: January 23, 1990
AGENDA ITEM: Request for funds for Police Department transition
and for implementation authority for the County
Administrator.
BACKGROUND•
The steps needed to ensure an orderly transition of County
law enforcement responsibilities from the Sheriff's Office to the
Police Department will require an expenditure of funds prior to
July 1, 1990, the effective date of the Police Department
implementation.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
As you know, a nationwide search is being conducted to
identify and hire a Police Chief and have him in place by May 1,
1990. It is our desire to effect a full transition to the new
department two months later on July 1, 1990. Funds will be
required for recruiting expenses, for two months salary, and the
furnishing of an office for the Chief.
Also, State law prohibiting the use of our current color
scheme for uniforms and vehicles in a police department will
require the re -painting and re -striping of all marked vehicles and
the purchase of new uniforms and accessories. In addition, all
forms, reports, business cards, and letterheads will need to be
ordered for the Police Department. Some of this cost can be offset
because it will reduce the need for these items in future Sheriff's
Department budgets.
An Employee Advisory Team has been established to assist in
the transition process in the following ways:
1. Act as a channel to receive and forward questions from
employees.
2. Generate and receive ideas to maximize the effectiveness
of the new department.
3. Provide input for budget consideration.
4. Provide input on personnel policies.
5. Provide input on uniforms, car markings, badges, etc.
cc:
The committee feels a great deal of ownership in this process
and in the new department and has been very enthusiastic in
carrying out the assigned tasks. The selection of uniform style,
color and accessories was by vote of the employees of the Uniform,
Criminal Investigation and Youth and Family Services Divisions.
These divisions will make up the new Police Department. On display
for your review today are their choices.
Summarized below are estimated expenses for the transition:
Uniforms $ 78,000
Paint/Stripe 46 marked vehicles 32,200
Chief's Salary/benefits (two months) 10,000
Stationery 13,000
Word Processor 3,000
Furniture 1,500
Recruiting costs, moving expenses, etc. 10,000
Assessment Center (6-10 individuals) 10,000
Total $157,700
RECOMMENDATION:
It is requested that the Board appropriate $157,700 to cover
transition and implementation expenses for the Roanoke County
Police Department and that the County Administrator be authorized
to implement the Police Department effective July 1, 1990, or prior
to that time, if necessary. It is further requested that the
County Administrator be authorized to work with the Sheriff of
Roanoke County to allocate personnel, funds and equipment for the
purpose of staffing and outfitting the Police Force.
Approved (x )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
SUBMITTED BY:
&� X�Q�
Elmer C. Hodg
County Administrator
ACTION
Motion by: Bob L. Johnson to
approve staff recommendation
File
Don Myers, Assistant County Adm.
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources
Sheriff Michael Kavanaugh
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Eddy x
Johnson x
McGraw x
Nickens
Robers
ACTION NO. A-12390-3
Item No. -D.,Z
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY,
MEETING DATE: January 23, 1990
SUBJECT: 1990 Roanoke Valley - Northern Virginia Economic
Bridges Project
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
There have been ongoing economic development contacts between the
Roanoke Valley and Northern Virginia since 1986. During September
1988, a delegation of business and community leaders traveled to
Fairfax County to make a presentation on the labor, quality of life
and locational advantages of the Roanoke Valley. This delegation
was followed by four (4) marketing trips by Roanoke County, Roanoke
City and New River Valley economic developers. The President of
George Mason University and his key staff members visited the
Roanoke Valley in the summer of 1989 and announced that Dewberry
and Davis was locating a branch office in Valleypointe.
Several 1989 marketing trips from the Roanoke Valley concluded that
Northern Virginia companies were seeking procurement contacts and
subcontracting opportunities to support contracts and projects with
the Federal Government. A Roanoke Valley "high tech" industry and
services marketing book was prepared from company literature to
present the capabilities of local companies.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
A marketing trip on January 15-16, 1990 to meet with
representatives of George Mason University and Fairfax County
Economic Development Authority concluded that a high profile 1990
"economic bridges" project was necessary to capitalize on previous
successes and continue momentum. A proposed visit of Northern
Virginia high tech companies to the Roanoke Valley was discussed.
However, constraints of travel and budgeting would limit the size
of the delegation and the duration of their visit.
PA
�-z
A more cost effective recommendation is to have George Mason
University sponsor a day and one half Roanoke Valley technology
fair in Northern Virginia. This would allow local companies to
display their high tech products, supplies and services to a
multitude of Washington Metro companies. It would create a better
exposure for the Roanoke Valley by presenting a unified program
with diverse high tech companies. The program would include short
technical seminars, presentations on the Valley and industry tours
of Northern Virginia companies.
FISCAL IMPACT:
A program and budget will have to be prepared for this project.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors:
1. Request the Regional Partnership to be the central Roanoke
Valley contact for the implementation of the "First Roanoke
Valley Technology Fair" to be held in the Fall of 1990.
2. Contact area businesses to ascertain their interest in
participating.
3 Provide staff resources from the County Economic Development
Department to support the Partnership in this project for
marketing and planning the technology fair.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED:
Timothy W. Gubala, Director Elmer C. Hodge, Jr.,
Economic Development County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION No Yes Abs
Approved (x) otion b • L e B. Eddv Eddy x
Denied ( ) o approve s�aLz� tioaohnson x
Received ( ) McGraw x
Referred Nickens x
to Robers x
cc: File
Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990
ORDINANCE 12390-4 ACCEPTING THE OFFER OF AND AUTHORIZING
THE EXECUTION OF A LEASE OF REAL ESTATE, OFFICE SPACE FOR
THE ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES LOCATED
IN THE CITY OF SALEM
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the
Charter of Roanoke County, the acquisition of any interest in real
estate, which includes a lease of office space, shall be
accomplished by ordinance and pursuant to the authority found in
Sections 15.1-262 and 15.1-897 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as
amended; and
2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the
Charter of Roanoke County the first reading on this ordinance was
held on January 9, 1990, and the second reading was held on January
23, 1990, concerning the lease of office space for the use of the
Roanoke County Department of Social Services in a building located
at the southwest corner of Main Street and College Avenue in the
City of Salem, Virginia, commonly known as the Salem Bank Building,
together with all appurtenances thereto belonging; and
3. That this lease is with the COLLEGE AVENUE BLDG LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP, a Pennsylvania limited partnership, of approximately
Thirteen Thousand, Two Hundred Sixty-seven (13,267) square feet of
office space consisting of the third and fourth floors, together
with forty (40) percent of the tenant parking provided for the
premises but in no event not less than sixteen (16) spaces for a
term commencing the first day of March 1990 and ending the 28th day
of February 1994 for a base rental for the initial four (4) year
term of the lease of Three Hundred Ninety-six Thousand Six Hundred
Eighty-three Dollars ($396,683) and with options to renew or extend
the term of the lease; and
4. That the lease agreement setting forth the terms and
conditions of this lease is incorporated herein by reference.
5. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute
this lease on behalf of the County of Roanoke and to execute such
other documents and take such other actions as are necessary to
accomplish this transaction all of which shall be upon form
approved by the County Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator
Betty Lucas, Director, Soecial Services
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990
ORDINANCE 12390-5 AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION
OF THE BRIDLEWOOD WATER SYSTEM, THE FALLING
CREEK WATER SYSTEM AND THE CHERRY HILL WATER
SYSTEM AND THE TRANSFER OF THE FALLING CREEK
WATER SYSTEM TO THE TOWN OF VINTON
WHEREAS, on November 4, 1986, the voters of Roanoke County
approved at referendum the issuance of general obligation bonds to
finance the costs of improving the County's public water supply;
and,
WHEREAS, $1,000,000 of this referendum were allocated to the
purchase of selected private water systems and wells; and,
WHEREAS, these bonds were issued March 1, 1988 through the
Virginia Resources Authority, and the proceeds used to acquire five
(5) privately owned water systems, leaving a balance of
approximately $477,000; and,
WHEREAS, the Utility Director has negotiated an agreement to
acquire an additional three (3) privately owned water systems; and,
WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs
that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance;
the first reading of this ordinance was held on December 19, 1989,
and the second reading was held on January 23, 1990.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
1) That the acquisition and acceptance of the Cherry Hill
Water System, which serves the Greenhill subdivision located in
west County, from the Cherry Hill Water Company for the sum of
Eleven Thousand ($11,000.00) Dollars is hereby authorized and
approved.
2) That the acquisition and acceptance of the Bridlewood
Water System, which serves the Bridlewood subdivision in southwest
County, from Water Distributors, Inc. for the sum of Ninety
Thousand One Hundred ($90,100.00) Dollars is hereby authorized and
approved.
3) That the acquisition and acceptance of the Falling Creek
Water System, which serves the Falling Creek subdivision in east
County, from Water Distributors, Inc. for the sum of One Hundred
Twenty Thousand Four Hundred ($120,400.00) Dollars is hereby
authorized and approved. That the acquisition of this water
system is subject to modification of the May 25, 1979 Agreement
with the Town of Vinton to allow the County to provide water
services within the area designated by said agreement.
4) That the assignment of the County's right to acquire the
Falling Creek Water System, or the subsequent sale of the Falling
Creek Water System by the County to the Town of Vinton for the sum
of One Hundred Twenty Thousand Four Hundred ($120,400.00) Dollars
is hereby authorized and approved. The transfer of the Falling
Creek Water System to the Town of Vinton is authorized pursuant to
Section 16.01 of the Roanoke County Charter since it is being made
available for other public uses.
5) That the sum of One Hundred One Thousand One Hundred
($101,100.00) Dollars is hereby appropriated from the 1988 General
Obligation Bond proceeds to fund the purchases of the Cherry Hill
Water System and the Bridlewood Water System in the amounts and for
the purposes described herein. The full faith and credit of the
r
County is pledged to the payment of this bond; however the County
plans to pay this bond from the proceeds of the revenues from the
County water system and Utility Enterprise Fund. That the sum of
One Hundred Twenty Thousand Four Hundred ($120,400.00) Dollars for
the acquisition of the Falling Creek Water System is hereby
appropriated from the Utility Enterprise Fund.
6) That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to
execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary
to accomplish these transactions, all of which shall be on form
approved by the County Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. 91len, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
George Nester, Vinton Town Manager
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990
RESOLUTION NO. 12390-6 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH
ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM
CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain section of the agenda of the
Board of Supervisors for January 23, 1990, designated as Item L -
Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to
each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1
through 3, inclusive, as follows:
1. Approval of Minutes - May 23, 1989
2. Approval of Minutes - January 3, 1990
3. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the
Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley
Community Services Board, Library Board and
Transportation and Safety Commission.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
Items L-2, L-3 on motion of Supervisor Nickens with the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS: None
Item L-1 on motion of Supervisor Nickens with the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Supervisor Eddy
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
1/26/90
CC: File
ACTION # A -12390-6.a
ITEM NUMBER L_3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE January 23, 1990
SUBJECT: Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the
the Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley
Community Services Board, Library Board and
Transportation and Safety Commission
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The following nominations have been made and must now be
confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. The nominee has agreed to
serve.
Library Board
Supervisor Johnson has nominated Dr. Norma Jean Peters to serve
another four-year term representing the Hollins Magisterial
District. Her term will expire December 31, 1993.
Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Community Services
Board
Supervisor Eddy has nominated the ratification of the Rev. Clay
Turner to serve as an at -large member. His three-year term will
expire on December 31, 1992. Reverend Turner's appointment must
also be ratified by the five participating governing bodies.
Transportation and Safety Commission
Supervisor Eddy has nominated Henry Gregory to serve the
unexpired term of May Johnson. The term will expire January 1,
1992.
SUBMITTED BY:
Mary H. Illen
Clerk to the Board
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
LZ
W
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens Yes No Abs
Denied ( ) Eddy x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
To: Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Library Board File
Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Community Services
Board File
Transportation and Safety Commission File
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990
ORDINANCE 12390-7 AMENDING CHAPTER Be "EROSION
AND SEDIMENT CONTROL" OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY
CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 8-11(a), "CONTROL
MEASURES GENERALLY" TO PROVIDE FOR THE
ADOPTION OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA
WHEREAS, the adoption of more stringent criteria to regulate
stormwater management is authorized by Section 10.1-562 of the Code
of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and
WHEREAS, notice of the County's intention to adopt an
amendment to its erosion and sediment control ordinance was duly
advertised in the Roanoke Times and World News on October 10, 1989,
October 17, 1989, December 5, 1989, and December 12, 1989; and
WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held on
October 10, 1989; the second reading and public hearing were held
on January 23, 1990.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That Chapter 8, "Erosion and Sediment Control" of the
Roanoke County Code be, and hereby is, amended and reenacted by
amending Section 8-11(a) to read and provide as follows:
Sec. 8-11. Control measures generally.
(a) Practices for erosion and sediment control in the county
shall meet or exceed the standards and specifications contained in
the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, Part III, as
published and amended through March 8, 1983, in haec verba and the
Code of Virginia, as amended, through such date, except for those
more stringent local stormwater management criteria which the Board
It
of Supervisors of Roanoke County Virginia may adopt by resolution
and incorporate into the manual of regulations and policies
entitled " Design and Construction Standards Manual."
2. That these amendments, additions, and reenactments shall
be in full force and effect from and after January 23, 1990, and
that the effective date for this ordinance and the section of the
"Design and Construction Standards Manual" concerning 1110 Year
Design Requirements" shall be in full force and effect from and
after January 23, 1990. The 1110 and 25 Year Design Requirements"
of said Manual shall be in force and effect from and after March
23, 1990.
On motion of Supervisor Eddy, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers
NAYS: Supervisor Nickens
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney
Magistrate
Sheriff's Department
Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke, 24016
Main Library
Roanoke County Code Book
Roanoke County J&D Court, Intake Counsellor
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990
RESOLUTION 12390-8 ADOPTING A NEW SECTION OF
THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL
ENTITLED "STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA"
WHEREAS, the Department of Development is in the process of
preparing a manual to assist the public, and especially the
development community, for clarification of rules, regulations, and
policies applicable to land development in Roanoke County; and
WHEREAS, a Design and Construction Standards Committee
composed of area engineers, surveyors, members of the Roanoke
Valley Homebuilders Association, and County staff was assembled to
develop the content of the manual and the design standards; and
WHEREAS, it was the consensus of the committee to address the
areas of water, sewer, street and parking, and stormwater
management in the manual; and
WHEREAS, at its meeting on February 14, 1989, the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, by resolution, adopted a
manual of regulations and policies entitled "Design and
Construction Standards Manual" to assist the public in the
clarification and interpretation of rules, regulations, and
policies applicable to land development in Roanoke County, and in
particular, the areas of water, sewer, street and parking; and
WHEREAS, the water design standards, street and parking design
standards and specifications, and subdivision approval for on-site
sewage disposal and well systems standards chapters of the manual
have been previously completed and adopted.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby adopt the fourth component
of the Design and Construction Standards Manual entitled
"Stormwater Management Criteria" which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference.
Further the section of the manual concerning 1110 Year Design
Requirements" shall be in full force and effect from and after
January 23, 1990, and the stormwater management criteria shall
apply to all plans which have not been approved by the Department
of Development and Inspection on or before January 23, 1990.
The 1110 and 25 Year Design Requirements" shall be in full
force and effect from and after March 23, 1990. These stormwater
management criteria shall apply to all plans which have not been
approved by the Department of Development and Inspection on or
before March 23, 1990.
On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt resolution with improved
wording in the manual, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers
NAYS: Supervisor Nickens
A COPY TESTE:
R
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
AMENDED
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990
DENIAL OF ORDINANCE TO AMEND PROFFERED
CONDITIONS ON THE REZONING OF A 3.9 ACRE TRACT
OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
ROUTE 419 AT THE INTERSECTION OF CHAPARRAL
DRIVE (TAX MAP NOS. 87.06-4-1 AND 87.06-4-2)
IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM
THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-1, CONDITIONAL,
TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-1,
CONDITIONAL UPON THE APPLICATION OF FRALIN &
WALDRON INC.
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
December 19, 1989, and the second reading and public hearing was
held January 23, 1990; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public
hearing on this matter on January 3, 1990; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law; and
WHEREAS, this property was rezoned from R-3, Multi -family
Residential District, to B-1, Office District with proffered
conditions, on August 13, 1985.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
DENIED on motion of Supervisor Robers, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
cc: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990
DENIAL OF ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE FUTURE LAND USE
PLAN MAP DESIGNATION OF APPROXIMATELY 28.05 ACRES
LOCATED OFF OF ROUTE 939 (AEROSPACE ROAD) IN THE
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM RURAL PRESERVE TO
DEVELOPMENT AND TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION
OF A 22.5 ACRE PARCEL FROM M-2 TO THE ZONING CLASS-
IFICATION R-1 UPON THE APPLICATION OF AEROSPACE
RESEARCH CORPORATION
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
December 19, 1989, and the second reading and public hearing was
held on January 23, 1990; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public
hearing on this matter on January 3, 1990; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
DENIED on motion of Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS: Supervisor McGraw
A COPY TESTE:
Q
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990
DENIAL OF ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.016 ACRE TRACT OF REAL
ESTATE LOCATED GENERALLY BEHIND 3707 AND 3655
BRAMBLETON AVENUE (TAX MAP NOS. 77.09-4-52 AND
77.09-4-52.1) IN THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL
DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-
2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF M-1 WITH
CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF BRAMBLETON
STORAGE CORPORATION
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
December 19, 1989, and the second reading and public hearing was
held January 23, 1990; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public
hearing on this matter on January 3, 1990; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
Denied on motion of Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990
ORDINANCE 12390-9 TO CHANGE THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF A .68 ACRE TRACT OF REAL
ESTATE LOCATED AT 4920 COVE ROAD (TAB MAP NO.
37.17-01-05) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL
DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-
2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF M-1 WITH
CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INDUSTRIES INC.
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
December 19, 1989, and the second reading and public hearing was
held January 23, 1990; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public
hearing on this matter on January 3, 1990; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real
estate containing .68 acre, as described herein, and located at
4920 Cove Road, (Tax Map Number 37.17-01-05) in the Catawba
Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning
classification of B-2, General Commercial District, to the zoning
classification of M-1, Light Industrial District.
2. That this action is taken upon the application of
Professional Services Industries Inc.
3. That the applicant has voluntarily proffered in writing the
following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts:
(1) No outside storage of materials.
(2) Cosmetic improvements to the exterior of the building.
(3) Plant new shrubs in front of the building.
(4) The property will be used primarily for the
sale of heating and air conditioning systems
and guttering and related components, and for
the inside storage and fabrication of materials
incidental to such sales and for office,
administrative and other purposes reasonably
related to the activities above-described.
(5) The total area of all business signs on the
property will not at any one time exceed the
sum of 1.25 square feet for each lineal foot
of street frontage and in no event more than
300 square feet, regardless of the number of
lineal feet of street frontage.
4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
BEGINNING at an iron stake on the
northwesterly right-of-way line of Peters
Creek Road, Virginia Highway Route 117, 146.29
feet northeasterly from an angle point at the
northwesterly corner of Peters Creek Road and
Cove Road, said beginning point being the
northeasterly corner of the property of Humble
Oil Co.; thence leaving Peters Creek Road and
with two lines of the Humble Oil Co. property
N. 74 deg. 21' W. 100.0 feet to an iron stake;
thence S. 34 deg. 28' 30" W. 165.00 feet to an
iron stake on the northerly right-of-way line
of Cove Road (Virginia Highway No. 116);
thence with same, leaving the Humble Oil Co.
property N. 74 deg. 21' W. 113.00 feet to an
iron stake, a corner to the property of Mrs.
Dorothy H. Whitesell, Mrs. Geraldine H. Waring
and Frances H. Easley; thence with same and
leaving Cove Road, N. 35 deg. 12' 10" E. 250.0
feet to a point, a new corner; thence with a
new division line through the property of
William Kenney S. 62 deg. 16' 50" E. 201.59
feet to a point on the northwesterly right-
of-way line of Peters Creek Road; thence with
said right-of-way line with a curved line to
the left, having a radius of 2334.83 feet, a
chord bearing and distance of S. 36 deg. 59'
35" W. 40.0 feet and an arc distance of 40.00
feet to the point of BEGINNING, containing
0.0685 acres, as shown on plat made by David
Dick & Associates, dated February 26, 1973,
which said plat is recorded in the Clerk's
Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County,
Virginia, in Deed Book 968, page 99.
BEING a part of the same property conveyed to
William Kenney by deed dated July 26, 1971,
which said deed is recorded in the
aforementioned Clerk's Office in Deed Book
926, page 533.
5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be
January 23, 1990.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw
A COPY TESTE:
17)
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
DENIED
ACTION # A12390-10
ITEM NUMBER / O"
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA
MEETING DATE: January 23, 1990
AGENDA ITEM: Resolution Supporting the Designation of Property
of Roanoke Rebos, Inc. as Exempt from Taxation by
the General Assembly of Virginia
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: /J
�. t .. „fl.` -i L"� fi�.�..-1�-Y�y.�.� � . S� F-'�""t 0-.+"1 .'t Y L.L•,y;.,� d "L il,... U.. t�G r L-tc � c' � �
BACKGROUND•'
Roanoke Rebos, Inc. was organized by a group of local
businessmen in 1985 to provide an alcohol free environment for
recovering alcoholics through THE REBOS (Sober) CLUB. In 1986, the
organization was chartered by the State Corporation Commission as
a non -stock corporation, and it has subsequently been granted tax
exempt status by the Internal Revenue Service under Section
501(c)(3). Roanoke Rebos, Inc. owns a large, old house (the former
Steele residence) located at 4231 Garst Mill Road in the Windsor
Hills Magisterial District and adjoining the County's Garst Mill
Park. This house is used both as the location for approximately
10 Alcoholics Anonymous meetings a week and as a meeting place or
club where recovering alcoholics can meet and socialize without
alcohol.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Roanoke Rebos, Inc has requested the introduction of
legislation which would exempt its real estate at 4231 Garst Mill
Road and any personal property owned from taxation by Roanoke
County. As a pre -condition to consideration of such legislation
by the appropriate committee(s) of the General Assembly, Section
30-19.04 of the Code of Virginia requires the Board of Supervisors
to adopt a resolution either supporting or opposing this requested
exemption. This statute requires the Board to consider the
following questions : (The answers have been provided by Mr. John
Turner, Treasurer of Roanoke Rebos, Inc.)
1. Whether the organization is exempt from taxation pursuant
to'Section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954? "Yes"
2. Whether a current annual alcoholic beverage license for
serving alcoholic beverages has been issued by the Alcoholic
/70-7
Beverage Control Board to such organization, for use on such
property? "No"
3. Whether any director or officer of the organization is
paid compensation in excess of a reasonable allowance for
salaries or other compensation for personal services which
such director or officer actually renders? "No. All officers
and directors volunteer their services without compensation."
4. Whether any part of the net earning of such organization
inures to the benefit of any individual. "No" And whether any
significant portion of the service provided by such
organization is generated by funds received from donations,
contributions, or local, state, or federal grants. "Yes"
5. Whether the organization provides services for the common
good of the public. "Yes"
6. Whether a substantial part of the activities of the
organization involves carrying on propaganda, or otherwise
attempting to influence legislation and whether the
organization participates in, or intervenes in, any political
campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office. "No"
7. No rule, regulation, policy, or practice of the
organization discriminates on the basis of religious
conviction, race, color, sex or national origin. "Correct"
8. Any other criteria, facts and circumstances which the
Board of Supervisors deems pertinent to the adoption of such
resolution.
Roanoke Rebos, Inc. has an annual budget of approximately
$30,000 which is funded primarily through fees from its sponsored
AA meetings on the premises, dues for The Rebos Club and other fund
raising activities such as an annual tent sale. Its expenses
include a $10,440 yearly mortgage payment to Signet Bank on their
house as well as utilities and maintenance and $3,600 a year paid
to the on -premises caretaker. The real estate taxes for this
property for 1989 was $924.60 on an assessed value of $80,400.00
LTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS:
Approval of this request for exemption from real and personal
property taxation will cost the County approximately $10,000 in tax
revenue over the next 10 years. As an alternative, the Board can
indicate that it does not support the request of this non-profit
corporation for tax exempt status. Not every non-profit
corporation which owns real estate in Roanoke County has been
granted such status.
f
W�
The staff recommends approval of this request and adoption of
this resolution.
Respectfully submitted,
o ph B. Obenshain, Esq.
enior Assistant County Attorney
Action Vote
No Yes Abs
Approved ( ) Motion by Lee B. Eddy to Eddy x
Denied (x) approve resolution- Denied by Johnson
Received ( ) _3 2 vote McGraw
Referred Nickens
to Robers
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990
RESOLUTION 12390-11 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF
THE COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTES,
SERIES 1990 IN THE AMOUNT OF $9000,000 AND SETTING
FORTH THE FORM AND DETAILS THEREOF
WHEREAS, Section 15.1-545 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as
amended, authorizes the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Roanoke, Virginia ("Board") to borrow money for the purpose of
meeting casual deficits in the revenue of the County of Roanoke,
Virginia ("County"); and
WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is necessary and
expedient to borrow $9,000,000 on behalf of the County and to issue
its Revenue Anticipation Notes, Series 1990 therefor ("Notes") to
meet casual cash flow deficits of the County; and
WHEREAS, the County has heretofore held a public hearing on
the issuance of the Notes in accordance with the requirements of
Section 15.1-171.1 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and
the County desires to specify the form and details of the Notes and
to award the Notes to the bidder whose proposal results in the
lowest interest cost to the County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of
the County of Roanoke, Virginia:
1. The Board of the County hereby determines that it is
advisable to contract a debt and to issue and sell the Notes in a
aggregate principal amount of $9,000,000. The issuance and sale
of the Notes are hereby authorized. The proceeds from the issuance
and sale of the Notes shall be used to meet casual cash flow
deficits of the County.
2. The Notes shall be issued in fully registered form,
without coupons, in substantially the form attached hereto as
Exhibit A. The Notes shall be dated as of the date of their
issuance and delivery, shall be issued in denominations of not less
than $100,000 each or whole multiples of $5,000 in excess of
$100,000, shall be numbered N-1 and upward, sequentially, shall
bear interest at a rate such that the true interest cost of the
Notes does not exceed 9.00% per annum, such rate to be established
by the County Administrator, payable at maturity, and shall mature
on June 15, 1990. The County Administrator shall accept the bid
for the purchase of the Notes which results in the lowest interest
cost to the County in accordance with the County's notice of sale
or request for proposals, provided that such interest cost shall
not exceed the maximum set forth above. The Notes shall not be
subject to payment or redemption before maturity.
3. The County Administrator and Treasurer of the County are
hereby authorized and directed to execute the Notes, and the County
Administrator is hereby authorized to affix or imprint the seal of
the County on the Notes. The form of execution, imprinting of the
seal and attestation may be by facsimile; provided, however, if the
signatures of the County Administrator and Treasurer are both by
facsimile, the Notes shall not be valid until authenticated by the
manual signature of the Paying Agent. In case any officer whose
signature or a facsimile of whose signature shall appear on any
Note shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of the
Notes, such signature or such facsimile shall nevertheless be valid
and sufficient for all purposes the same as if he or she had
remained in office until such delivery. Any Note may bear the
facsimile signature of or may be signed by such persons as at the
actual time of its execution are the proper officers to sign such
Note although at the date of delivery of such Note such persons may
not have been such officers. Upon receipt of payment therefor, the
Treasurer of the County or such agent as may be designated, shall
issue and deliver the Notes to the purchaser or purchasers thereof.
The officers and agents of the County are further authorized and
directed to do all acts required by the Notes and by this
Resolution for the full, punctual and complete performance of all
things necessary for this borrowing.
4. Crestar Bank, Richmond, Virginia is appointed as Paying
Agent and Registrar for the Notes. The principal of and interest
on the Notes shall be payable in lawful money of the United States
upon surrender of the Notes on the maturity date at the principal
corporate trust office of the Paying Agent in Richmond, Virginia.
-2-
5. Upon surrender for transfer or exchange of any Note at
the principal office of the Note Registrar, the County shall
execute and deliver and the Note Registrar shall authenticate in
the name of the transferee or transferees a new Note or Notes of
any authorized denomination in an aggregate principal amount equal
to the Note surrendered and of the same form and maturity and
bearing interest at the same rate as the Note surrendered, subject
in each case to such reasonable regulations as the County and the
Note Registrar may prescribe. All Notes presented for transfer or
exchange shall be accompanied by a written instrument or
instruments of transfer or authorization for exchange, in form and
substance reasonably satisfactory to the County and the Note
Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or by his or her
duly authorized attorney-in-fact or legal representative. No Note
may be registered to bearer.
New Notes delivered upon any transfer or exchange shall be
valid obligations of the County, evidencing the same debt as the
Notes surrendered, shall be secured by this Resolution and entitled
to all of the security and benefits hereof to the same extent as
the Notes surrendered.
6. No charge shall be made for any exchange or transfer of
Notes, but the County may require by the holder of any Note of a
sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge which
may be imposed with respect to the transfer or exchange of such
Note.
7. The Board agrees on behalf of the County that the
proceeds from the issuance and sale of the Notes will be invested
and expended as set forth in the Non -Arbitrage Certificate and Tax
Covenants of the County to be delivered at the time of the issuance
and delivery of the Notes and that the County will comply with such
covenants as may be necessary in order to comply with the
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
("Code") including the provisions of Section 148 of the Code and
applicable regulations relating to "arbitrage bonds," and with the
other covenants and representations contained therein. Further,
-3-
the County shall comply with the reporting requirements of Section
149(e) of the Code.
8. The officers and agents of the County are hereby
authorized and directed to prepare, execute and deliver an
appropriate official statement, notice of sale, request for
proposals or such other disclosure documents as may be necessary
to expedite the sale of the Notes. The official statement, notice
of sale or other disclosure documents shall be published in such
publications and distributed in such manner and at such times as
the appropriate officers or agents of the County shall determine.
9. The officers and agents of the County are authorized and
directed to take such further action as may be necessary or
convenient in connection with the issuance, sale and delivery of
the Notes and all actions previously taken by such officers and
agents in connection therewith are ratified and confirmed.
10. The appropriate officers and agents of the County are
authorized and directed to immediately cause a certified copy of
this Resolution, setting forth the form and details of the Notes,
to be filed with the Circuit Court of the County pursuant to
Sections 15.1-199 and 15.1-212 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as
amended.
11. This Resolution shall take effect immediately.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
c�
Mary H. ATlefi, Clerk
cc: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Don Myers, Assistant County Administrator
Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
-4-
U
1
ACTION NO. A-12390-12
ITEM NO. / �U /
- ! 1 0.4
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: January 23, 1990
AGENDA ITEM: Appeal of the Decision of the Zoning Administrator;
Interpretation of Proffered Conditions pertaining
to signage; Hop -In development located at the
northeast corner of Peter's Creek and Woodhaven Dr.;
Hollins Magisterial District.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS.-
BACKGROUND:
OMMENTS:BACKGROUND: 1
On July 12, 1988 the Board of Supervisors approved a R-1 to
B-2 conditional rezoning request at the northeast corner of Peter's
Creek Rd. and Woodhaven Dr. The rezoning request was submitted on
behalf of Mr. Frank Radford who wished to develop the site as a
convenience store\office building complex. In approving the
request, the Board accepted a number of voluntary proffers offered
by Mr. Radford. Some of these proffers pertained to the type and
size of signage that could be located on the property. These
proffers are as follows:
1. The sign will be in accordance with the rendering
presented to the Planning Commission and the Board of
Supervisors.
2. There will be no green on the signage.
3. There will be no bunnies on the signage.
4. Signage for the Hop -In Store and the donut shop will not
exceed a total of sixty (60) square feet. If signage is
located on a pole, the pole will not exceed twenty (20)
feet in height.
5. The signage for the office building will be monument -
type signage not to exceed twenty-four (24) square feet.
6. There will be no free standing advertising signs on the
premises.
2
The property was developed in 1989, and in October, Mr.
Radford applied for sign permits for the convenience store portion
of the site. The Zoning Administrator reviewed the proffered
conditions accepted in July of 1988, and informed Mr. Radford that
his signage plan for the property did not conform to the proffer
that limited total signage for the Hop -In Store and donut shop to
a total of sixty (60) square feet (Proffer * 4; above). Mr.
Radford asserted that the proffer was only intended to apply to the
freestanding sign on the property, and was not intended to limit
the total convenience store signage to sixty (60) feet.
The Zoning Administrator issued a formal opinion to Mr.
Radford on October 30, 1989, and advised him of his options should
he wish to display signage on the property in excess of the
proffered limits. Mr. Radford chose to appeal the Zoning Ad-
ministrators interpretation of the proffer pursuant to Section
15.1-491.5 of the State code.
ANALYSIS OF INFORMATION:
Prior to issuing my October 30, 1989 decision to Mr. Radford,
I reviewed the following sources of information:
1. The Statement of Proffered Conditions submitted to the
County on behalf of Mr. Radford.
2. The July 12, 1989 Final Order of the Board.
3. The minutes and transcript of the April 5, 1988 Planning
Commission meeting at which Mr. Radford's agent presented
the proffers to the Commission.
4. A minutes of the July 12th, 1988 Board Meeting.
5. Audio tapes of the April 5, and July 12 meetings
referenced above.
None of these sources of information contradicted the language
of the Board's Final Order which limited the signage to a total of
sixty (60) square feet. On the basis of my review of these sources
of information, I advised Mr. Radford of my decision and informed
him of his options.
In this application for an appeal of my decision, Mr. Radford
indicates that he wishes to display signage on the property that
will "not exceed limits of the sign ordinance." Based upon the
approximately six hundred and fifty (650) feet of frontage of this
property on Woodhaven Dr. and Peter's Creek Rd., the existing sign
ordinance would permit nineteen hundred and fifty (1950) square
feet of sign area on the property. The proposed sign ordinance,
190-11a--/
3
to be discussed by the Board in February, would allow a total of
approximately six -hundred and twenty-five (625) square feet of
signage on the property, with a 200 square foot maximum per
business.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends as follows:
1. That the Board uphold the Zoning Administrator's
interpretation of the proffer, as stated in his October
30, 1989 opinion letter.
Respectfully submitted,
Terrance L. Harri ton
Zoning Administrator
Director of Planning and Zoning
Action Vote
No Yes Abs
Approved (x) Motion by Harry C. NinkenG Eddy x
Denied ( ) motion to uphold zoning Johnson x
Received ( ) administrator jnter_nretatian McGraw x
Referred Nickens x
to Robers x
cc: File
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning and Zoning
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
1
ACTION NO. A-12390-13
I TEM NO. /'?0- // �
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: January 23, 1990
AGENDA ITEM: Appeal of the Decision of the Zoning Administrator;
Interpretation of Proffered Conditions pertaining
to signage; Hop -In development located at the
northeast corner of Glen Heather Dr. and Route 419
in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR"S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
On December 13, 1988 the Board of Supervisors approved a R-3
to B-2 conditional rezoning request at the northeast corner of Glen
Heather Dr. and Route 419. The rezoning request was submitted on
behalf of Mr. Frank Radford who wished to develop the site as a
convenience store. In approving the request, the Board accepted
a number of voluntary proffers offered by Mr. Radford. One of
these proffers pertained to the type and size of signage that could
be located on the property. This proffer is as follows:
1. The signage not to exceed 30 square feet nor shall there
be any green bunnies on the signage. No billboards,
portable, or temporary signs will be permitted.
The property was developed in 1989, and in October, Mr.
Radford inquired about sign permits for the convenience store. The
Zoning Administrator reviewed the proffered conditions accepted in
December of 1988, and informed Mr. Radford that his intended
signage plan for the property did not conform to the proffer that
limited total signage for the convenience store to a total of
thirty (30) square feet. Mr. Radford asserted that the proffer was
only intended to apply to the freestanding sign on the property,
and was not intended to limit the total convenience store signage
to thirty (30) feet.
The Zoning Administrator issued a formal opinion to Mr.
Radford on December 20, 1989, and advised him of his options should
he wish to display signage on the property in excess of the
proffered limits. Mr. Radford chose to appeal the Zoning
2
Administrators interpretation of the proffer pursuant to Section
15.1-491.5 of the State code.
ANALYSIS OF INFORMATION:
Prior to issuing my December 20, 1989 decision to Mr. Radford,
I reviewed the following sources of information:
1. The Statement of Proffered Conditions submitted to the
County on behalf of Mr. Radford.
2. The December 13, 1988 Final Order of the Board.
3. The minutes and transcript of the December 6, 1988
Planning Commission meeting at which Mr. Radford's agent
presented the proffers to the Commission.
4. The minutes of the December 13, 1988 Board Meeting.
5. Audio tapes of the December 6, and December 13, meetings
referenced above.
None of these sources of information contradicted the language
of the Board's Final Order which limited the signage to a total of
thirty (30) square feet. On the basis of my review of these
sources of information, I advised Mr. Radford of my decision and
informed him of his options.
In this application for an appeal of my decision, Mr. Radford
indicates that he wishes to display signage on the property that
will "not exceed limits of the sign ordinance." Based upon the
approximately three hundred and sixty-five (365) feet of frontage
of this property on Glen Heather Dr. and Route 419, the existing
sign ordinance would allow the convenience store one thousand
ninety-five (1095) square feet of sign area. The proposed sign
ordinance, to be discussed by the Board in February, would allow
a total of approximately three hundred and ten (310) square feet
of sign area on the convenience store property, with a 200 square
foot maximum per business.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends as follows:
1. That the Board uphold the Zoning Administrator's
interpretation of the proffer as stated in his December
20, 1989 opinion letter .
cc:
3
Respectfully submitted,
I - —Z /Z - /�'
TerranceX. Harrington
Zoning dminis rator
Director of Planning and Zoning
Action
Approved (x) Motion by Lee B. Eddy motion tUddy
Denied ( )uphold zoning administrator Johnson
Received ( )interpretation McGraw
Referred Nickens
to Robers
File
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Vote
No Yes Abs
x