Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3/13/1990 - Adopted Board RecordsAT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 1990 RESOLUTION 31390-1 EXPRESSING APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO CLARENCE W. SIMMONS FOR 17 1/2 YEARS OF SERVICE TO ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, Clarence W. Simmons was first employed in May, 1972, as a fire fighter in the Fire and Rescue Department, and served as a Fire Lieutenant for eleven and one-half years; and WHEREAS, Clarence W. Simmons was certified as an Instructor I and served as a regional member of the HAZMAT Team; and WHEREAS, through his employment with Roanoke County, Clarence W. Simmons was instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to CLARENCE W. SIMMONS for seventeen and one-half years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful and productive retirement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and caused the seal of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, to be affixed this 13th day of March, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: 16/. C2.Q-c4ti Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources Tommy Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 1990 RESOLUTION 31390-2 APPROVING THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION BUDGET FOR FY 1990-1991, UPON CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS WHEREAS, Section 24.B of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Act and Section 17.(a) of the contract between the City of Roanoke, Roanoke County, and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission provide that the Commission shall prepare and submit its operating budget for the forthcoming fiscal year to the Board of Supervisors of the County and the City Council of the City; and WHEREAS, by report dated February 14, 1990, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board, the Chairman of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission has submitted a request that the County approve the FY 1990-1991 budget of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the following FY 1990-1991 budget for the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission is hereby APPROVED: EXPENDITURE PROJECTIONS Current 1989-90 1. Operations and Maintenance A. Salaries, Wages & Benefits $ 851,307 B. Operating Expenditures 791,137 C. Internal Services 574,300 Total Operations and Maintenance $2,216,744 2. Non -Operating Expenses Proposed 1990-91 $1,087,399 1,083,600 600,245 $2,771,244 A. Interest $ 648,780 $ 635,073 B. Depreciation 580,366 N/A C. Debt Service N/A 240,193 Total Non -Operating Expenses $1,229,146 $ 875,266 3. Capital from Revenue A. Equipment $ 73,800 $ 63,100 B. Projects 165,000 166,000 Total Capital from Revenue $ 238,800 $ 229,100 TOTAL EXPENDITURE PROJECTIONS $3,684,690 $3,875,610 REVENUE PROJECTIONS Current Proposed 1989-90 1990-91 Operatina Revenue 1. Terminal Building A. Concessions $ 866,401 $ 926,744 B. Advertising 25,404 44,400 C. Building Rentals 742,431 895,518 D. Privilege Fees 8,192 8,712 2. Airfield A. Landing Fees $ 771,852 $ 623,451 B. Miscellaneous 175,078 218,791 3. Parking Lot $ 877,860 $1,030,126 4. Building and Equipment $ 179,751 $ 143,000 5. Other $ 12,643 $ 13,535 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE $3,659,612 $3,904,277 Non-Operatina Revenue 1. Interest on Investment $ 42,224 $ 170,000 2. Interest from Debt Service N/A $ 63,000 Total Non -Operating Revenue $ 42,224 $ 233,000 TOTAL REVENUE $3,701,836 $4,137,277 and the County Administrator and the Clerk are authorized to execute and attest, respectively, on behalf of the County, documentation, in form approved by the County Attorney, necessary to evidence said approval. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: .lb' - Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget W. Robert Herbert, Chairman, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council 0 ACTION NO. A-31390-3 ITEM NUMBER -M - 2— AT AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Communication to the Mayor of the City of Roanoke regarding suggested modifications to the Consolidation Agreement COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Attached is a letter prepared by Richard W. Robers, Chairman of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors outlining several proposed modifications to the Roanoke County -Roanoke City Consolidation Agreement. It is requested by the Chairman that the Board of Supervisors concur in communicating this correspondence to Noel C. Taylor,Mayor of the City of Roanoke. cc: File ------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved (X) Motion by: Steven A. McGraw No Yes Abs Denied ( ) motion to send letter Eddy Received ( ) (Harry C. Nickens was absent —x Johnson x_ Referred ( ) when vote was taken but later McGraw To ( ) asked that his vote be recorded x Pickens x Robers x cc: File F a,�ii"F Z 0 o a? 18 EA 88 sFSQU10ENTENN�PV A Beauti fulBeginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Tounty of TRoatt0kr March 13, 1990 The Honorable Noel C. Taylor, Mayor City of Roanoke 215 Church Avenue Roanoke, Va. 24011 Dear Mayor Taylor: ALLdMI WAOT► 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERLAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW, VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors requests that the Roanoke City Council consider the following suggestions for modifying the recent agreement presented to the Circuit Court judges regarding the matter of the consolidation of our two governments. Our reasoning for suggesting these modifications is as follows: The negotiated document upon which we agreed is a good document resulting from the give and take of many months of negotiations and we commend the negotiators from both the City and the County. The matter of consolidation, however, is very complex and touches certain issues that are very important to certain specific individuals and groups of people. These people will be affected by the outcome of our most important vote relating to the issue of consolidation. During the public meetings on the agreement, many specific issues were brought forward by County residents. We are now at the point where the perspective of the entire Board of Supervisors and the entire City Council can be used to modify our agreement with the hope of better satisfying the needs of these citizen groups, should consolidation be approved by the voters. No doubt there will be opposition to the agreement, even if modified by all or some of these suggested changes. However, we have identified three areas which seem to have caused the most vocal opposition to the agreement. We therefore make these suggestions for modification because most opposition to the current plan was voiced by specific groups of County residents as they relate to three specific issues. We ask that you seriously consider our suggested modifications to P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2004 Mayor Taylor Page 2 March 13, 1990 the agreement unless you can explain how such modifications might adversely impact the new RMG if approved by the voters. Again, our reason for these proposed modifications is to make the agreement acceptable to a larger percentage of County residents. Our suggested modifications: 1. Include an equal amount of members from both the current City and County on the RMG School Board with the provision of a Court appointed tie breaker. 2. Modify the service district concept to revise district boundaries based upon function needs and availability of public utilities, establish guidelines for the creation of such districts, provide for a citizen petition process, revise the tax rate differential, adjust the pro -forma budgets, and amend the election district boundaries crossing the old City -County boundaries and including a mix of urban and rural interests. 3. Citizens in west Roanoke County (Catawba Magisterial District and expansion by the City of Salem) and in east Roanoke County (expansion by the Town of Vinton) should have a vote to decide their future and their form of government. This would allow a subsequent referendum for the residents in west Roanoke County and east Roanoke County if consolidation is approved. Should you wish t agreement we will session for that modifications, we judges considering RWR/mha o discuss this matter of modification to the be glad to work with you in scheduling a joint purpose. If agreement is reached on these look forward to jointly submitting same to the this matter. Sincerely, Richard W. Robers, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ACTION NO. A-31390-4 ITEM NUMBER -D— 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Automatic Court Documentation System COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: -►+�'' I' '�' BACKGROUND: During the Spring of 1989, an automatic court documentation system was installed in a Roanoke County Circuit Court courtroom. A grant in the amount of $50,000 was received from the Commonwealth of Virginia to help defray the initial cost of this system. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At this time, the Circuit Court would like to install a second automatic court documentation system. Consistency needs to be established for each of the two Circuit Court courtrooms as well as for the two Circuit Court judges. Immediate savings can be recognized by the elimination of a court reporter being present in the courtroom. The costs of typing transcripts for cases on appeal can also be eliminated. Roanoke County is serving as the pilot project for the entire State of Virginia. The total cost of the second system is approximately $63,000. $38,000 of the total can be funded within the Circuit Court's current budget. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds have not been budgeted at this time for the total cost of the court documentation system. $25,000 will need to be appropriated. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends appropriating $25,000 from the unappropriated balance to fund this project. e4t4- 14ero, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved (X) Motion by: Harry C'_ NinkPns to No Yes Abs Denied ( ) anp nriirate $75,nn from ranital Eddy x_ Received ( ) ITn prnnri atarl Ra 1 ance Johnson x Referred ( ) McGraw _ x To ( ) Nickens Robers cc: File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Elizabeth Stokes, Clerk, Circuit Court ACTION NO. A-31390-5 ITEM NUMBER M — 6K AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request for an Appropriation of $50,000 to the Parks and Recreation Department to cover Contract Mowing and the Purchase of Capital Equipment COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: -4,7'.d 4,/ BACKGROUND • %�Lv Since the approval of the 1985 bond referendum, which included $1 million for park improvements, the County's grounds maintenance staff has been fighting an uphill battle to keep up with the growing demands of grass cutting and turf maintenance. The chart below points out the growth in the number of parks and park acreage, since the fiscal year just prior to the bond referendum and reflects the coming online of Green Hill Park in the spring of 1990. County Parks Developed Tennis Courts Baseball/Softball Fields Grounds Around Facilities Parks/Grounds Acres Total Mowing Acres Riding Mowers Grounds Maintenance Personnel 1984 1988 1990 43 46 50 48 51 51 40 43 48 19 20 22 427 413 780 187 201 367 5 6 6 24 24 24 You will note that the number of acres requiring maintenance has increased from 427 to 780, and the number of acres requiring mowing has increased from 187 to 367. During the same period, the mowing equipment and manpower to accomplish this task have remained the same. In the upcoming budget (1990-91), monies have been included to purchase badly needed mowing equipment and also monies for contract mowing around the public buildings maintained by our Parks and Recreation staff. While this funding would appear to alleviate our problems, it, in actuality, represents "too little, too late", because our mowing season begins in April and not in July, when the new fiscal year begins. �-y The Board of Supervisors is requested to consider appropriating $30,000 for the capital equipment necessary to accomplish the mowing task to be purchased immediately for use during this spring and summer's mowing season and also, to appropriate $20,000 to provide for the contract mowing around public . buildings for the period ending June 30, 1990. Consequentially, the budgeted request for the 1990-91 fiscal year would be reduced by the $30,000 capital equipment amount. Ideally, parks and public facility grounds should be mowed once every five working days. In recent years, this level has grown to once every eleven working days, and unless contractual assistance is obtained and new equipment purchased to allow the County staff to handle more acreage satisfactorily, this frequency will be once every twenty working days. By authorizing the purchase of the equipment now, and beginning the contractual assistance, we will be able to maintain the once every eleven day cycle, which we have experienced for the past several years. The attachment shows the parks and public grounds, to be maintained by our Parks & Recreation Department as of the spring of 1990. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACT: Alternative #1: Appropriate $50,000 from the Fund Balance to allow the purchase of the capital equipment in the spring of 1990 and begin contract mowing around public buildings during the spring cutting season. As a consequence, $30,000 will be reduced from the 1990-91 fiscal year budget, as the capital equipment will have already been purchased. Alternative #2: Appropriate $30,000 to allow the purchase of the capital equipment out of the current fiscal year, thus reducing the increased demand on the County staff and equipment. This stop gap measure would allow the cutting of grass approximately every fifteen working days, prior to July 1 and when the monies become available in the new budget, the frequency would likely improve to once every eleven working days. The disadvantage of this alternative is the fact that the appearance of our grounds will not be at an acceptable level prior to July 1, 1990, and there is likely to be a negative public reaction to the appearance of our facilities prior to this time. Once monies become available in the budget, the situation should right itself, however, it may then appear to the people who have screamed the loudest that their efforts were rewarded even though dollars at that time will be available to adequately maintain the facilities. This attitude may then repeat itself on other occasions when the citizen feels that his individual need is not being fulfilled. Alternative #3: Appropriate no new monies during the 1989- 90 fiscal year. Like the disadvantages of Alternative #2, we do not have enough manpower and equipment to maintain appropriately the grounds at this time. By waiting until July 1, to order new -2- Z— L/ equipment, it will have a limited impact on the ability to help with our grass cutting needs during this summer and the contractual services, which have been budgeted in the 1990-91 fiscal year plan, should aid the appearance of our facilities towards the end of the summer of 1990. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1 as the effort necessary to appropriately present County owned facilities to our residents. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ohn M. Cham iss, Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Assistant Administrator County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Harry LTi kAns to No Yes Abs Denied ( ) approve staff recommendation Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) McGraw x To ( ) Nickens x Robers x cc: File John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Steve Carpenter, Director, Parks & Recreation Gardner Smith, Director, General Services Jack Council, Director, Procurement -3- DISTRICT 1• NAME NORTH REGION PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PROPOSED GROUNDS MAINTENANCE AREAS NORTH COUNTY Catawba Center Whispering Pines Brookside SADLER Walrond Mason Cove RCOS Mountain View Northside Burlington Hollins Fire Mason Cove Fire Catawba fire Hollins Library Courthouse Youth Haven II Southview Center Womack Tract Sierra Drive Lot PARKS SCHOOL PARKS PUBLIC GROUNDS VACANT LOTS :2) - 7 ACREAGE 5.00 20.00 20.00 3.50 50.00 98.50 2.00 8.00 5.30 13.55 4.95 33.80 2.43 1.00 2.51 1.96 5.00 1.50 3.00 17.40 26.84 1.00 27.84 TOTAL ACRES......... 177.54 -4- DISTRICT 2• NAME Green Hill NORTH REGION PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PROPOSED GROUNDS MAINTENANCE AREAS GLENVAR AREA Fort Lewis Glenvar Elementary Glenvar High Burton Fort Lewis Fire Glenvar Libary PSC Cemetery PARKS SCHOOL PARKS PUBLIC GROUNDS VACANT LOTS -5- ACREAGE 225.00 225.00 3.15 2.00 3.00 5.00 13.15 3.00 10.45 19.81 33.26 1.50 1.50 TOTAL ACRES . . . . . 272.91 DISTRICT 3• NAME SOUTH REGION PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PROPOSED GROUNDS MAINTENANCE AREAS VINTON AREA Mt. Pleasant Craig Center Stonebridge Gearhart (Vinton owned) Gladetown (Vinton owned) Mrs. Willie Martin Park Vinyard William Byrd High Mt. Pleasant Fire Vinton Library Cemetery Cemetery PARKS (Dundee) SCHOOL PARKS GROUNDS LOTS �-y ACREAGE 10.00 5.00 51.25 9.00 1.00 5.00 41.20 122.45 2.25 2.25 1.08 1.35 2.43 1.00 1.00 2.00 TOTAL ACRES......... 129.13 SOUTH REGION PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PROPOSED GROUNDS MAINTENANCE AREAS DISTRICT 4: CAVE SPRING HEADOUARTERS: WILLIAM BRYD VOCATIONAL SHOP NAME Clearbrook Garst Mill Ogden Penn Forest Sugar Loaf Mtn. Happy Hollow Starkey Leisure Arts Cave Spring Elementary Cave Spring High Cave Spring Jr. Clearbrook Green Valley Back Creek Bent Mtn. Hidden Valley Oak Grove RCAC Cave Spring Fire Bent Mt. Fire Clearbrook Fire Main Library PARKS SCHOOL PARKS GROUNDS -7- -D- y ACREAGE 4.80 27.00 3.00 12.27 47.00 34.50 13.60 2.50 144.67 2.00 .50 5.90 3.00 4.75 3.40 1.60 5.00 2.50 28.65 4.53 1.25 1.92 1.98 2.52 12.20 TOTAL ACRES........ 185.52 Zl—y Uj �AA 0 nro M a a r• n a CE m �o r- n H 0 E ro W co 0 n w r• H cv %O H H 19 w 00 v w t1ix K w 0b N N tt2i (•� C bro C7 til tj] H fn oa° a IV O A) aw w "<m`<m ►<mL<m Cm N►C NSC NL<< N'< 0►< L< C.ro O tL cn cn cn u, p n E E E E to r• 0 0 0 0 w w r• w H a C a N t7 110 maa: fy m LL tii a<a< l<m•<m KC ar&� 0 w<m►<m NmNn N�iN�i `C NC oL<Nm rr� a < H H i~+ N 000 cn Ir m 00 t�! �• O '� E £ O a0 C �4 w �Ot n r• r• 0 0 N O110 11tii11tii A.< Q•C maa0 a<a< 0mam ►sJr� ar•L<0 m►<m kn'<m tin m H m m N� N� N►C N►< ►<.4H 0 < a r r A.rrr G m ON 0 1C r• `C E E O O �c tsi 0 O Oko t4 r� 75' W r• O H N t7 A. 0 �I. t�! p. t�J fy C A. < ►1i �n maa� a<a< 0 m 0 m til ar-� 0 mL<m 0H �< N m N N N �< N '•C N H 0 G O O (<D O O k�� w n n t C7 to x H r• r- :1 :1 w w rd W ►� ro N va0 t2i11tij w m a m�<7�00 maa� a<a< ►< ►<n • CPC m m N N N� 1-1 91 m ti N n N 0 '< H H IO t17 tri 0 C r N 0. N r 0 r G m 1"' E E 1 th O 0 r w m w w � w Zl—y z K 0 F3 CE m �o x x 00 0 E ro W co 00 ri) me cxn cv %O H H �o 00 v o t1ix t" t2i r tt2i (•� C ;d til tj] H fn H O Z ACTION NO. A-31390-6 ITEM NO. S AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Application for raffle permit, Cave Spring Jaycees COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: J BACKGROUND• d J On February 28, 1989, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County tabled consideration of a request by the Cave Spring Jaycees for a permit to conduct a raffle. At that time the Board was concerned that the application had not been filed in timely manner, that the raffle had already been held, and whether or not the proposed actions constitute a "raffle" under the provisions of the State Code. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the direction of the Board this office requested the assistance of the Commonwealth's Attorney to determine whether or not a "Casino Night" constituted a "raffle" under the provisions of the State Code. Based upon the facts submitted last year, the Commonwealth's Attorney questions whether or not a "Casino Night" falls within the statutory definition of a "raffle." The State Code defines "raffle" as a lottery in which the prize is won by a random drawing of the name or prearranged number of one or more persons purchasing chances. No permit to conduct a raffle or a bingo game shall be denied, suspended or revoked except upon notice stating the proposed basis for such action and the time and place for a hearing thereon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the past history of this organization's compliance with the County ordinance and State law, the Board should closely scrutinize this permit application. The Board's decision on the application for a bingo permit for the Fort Lewis Rescue Squad, Inc. on February 13, 1990, may be of some assistance. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( Motion by Richard W. Robers Eddy Denied ( ) to approve Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens to Robers cc: File Bingo/Raffle Paul Mahoney, File County Attorney D - S Vote No Yes Abs x x x x x :1)-5 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO Application is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the under- signed applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. All applicants should exercise extreme care to ensure the accura- cy of their responses to the following questions. Bingo games and raffles are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. sec. of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. seg. of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investiga- tion prior to granting a bingo or raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Any person violating county or state regulations concerning these permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any person who uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any purpose other than the lawful religious, charitable, community, or educational purposes for which the organization is specifi- cally organized, except for reasonable operating expenses, shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (check one) RAFFLE PERMIT BINGO GAMES Name of organization v� `�p,;,�d c,(_t1:'_ Street Address Mailing Address r . D. t� �� `} 1 City, State, Zip Code cs ,,ckQ VA Purpose and Type of Organization Le Apdk<< � y-gpt,JLtj4 Cl'yYVt►tit�W is y,S[ ICI When was the organization founded? 1Q W 3 1 Roanoke County meeting place? ; Has organization been in existence in Roanoke County for two con- tinuous years? YES NO Is the organization non-profit? YES v/ NO Indicate Federal Identification Number n Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption letter. Officers of the Organization: President: 1,core- Address: -7-3 pc -c- .- C,;' 1: VA Vice -President r -v-\ (hr�rn� on Address: 3��f 3 �%, e AvE_ Secretary: "�}�; ,; v K_ Treasurer: Address: Address: (s)Ocr_ l ?cr�1c �_�4_ 1:7d -#`1 lQ_ \1A r; —, i 7c,G-;—,c kiC \.,'A Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle or Bingo opera- tions: Name Home Address rc� r,� ; 7, 1 k rl " .• Phone Bus. Phone A COMPLETE LIST OF THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF CURRENT MEMBER- SHIP MUST BE FURNISHED WITH THIS APPLICATION. Specific location where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted. Cr4�G.�u� t rs c CuA,15 RAFFLES: Date of Drawing., Time of Drawing BINGO: Days of Week & Hours of Activity: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday From To From To From To From To From To From To From To 2 State specifically how the proceeds from the Bingo/Raffle will be used. List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use estimates amounts if necessary. ALLC;OC— O� 2)--5 BINGO: Complete the following: Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted: Name: Address: County State zip Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization? Seating capacity for each location: Parking spaces for each location: ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1 - 19 1. Gross receipts from all sources related to the operation of Bingo games or Instant Bingo by calendar quarter for prior calen- dar year period. BINGO INSTANT BINGO lst Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total 2. Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, associa- tion, organization, partnership, or corporation of any classifica- tion whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or con- ducting Bingo Games or Raffles? 3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Bingo games and Raffles, and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? �/e 4. Does your organization understand that the Commissioner of the Revenue or his designee has the right to go upon the premises on which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle, to perform unannounced audits, and to secure for audit all re- cords required to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles? �/C J 4 .'D -5 5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report must be filed with the Commissioner of the Revenue on or before the first day of November of each calendar year for which a per- mit has been issued? �Zc-, 6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts ex- ceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an addi- tional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later than sixty days following the last day of such quarter? �Z.& 7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of the permit, and no such organization shall conduct any Bingo game or raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed and a new permit is obtained? 8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, commu- nity, or educational purposes for which the organization is spe- cifically chartered or organized, and that the operation of Bingo games or raffles have been in accordance with the provisions of Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia? ,, e 9. Does your organization understand that a one percent audit fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before the first of November?� 10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid only in the County of Roanoke and only at such locations, and for such dates, as are designated in the permit application? 11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a bona fide member of any such organization who shall have been a member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to such participation, shall participate in the management, opera- tion, or conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person shall receive any remuneration for participating in management, operation, or conduct of any such game or raffle? �e s '12) Has your organization attached a check for the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke, Virginia? 4C3 13. Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or §18.2- 340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? Vet, 14. Has your organization attached a complete list of its member- ship to this application form? N&5 15. Has your organization attached a copy of its bylaws to this application form? Vel -'�16. Has the organization been declared exempt from roperty taxa- tion under the Virginia Constitution or statutes? If yes, state whether exemption is for real, personal proper Y or both and identify exempt property._ /�a� ✓17. State the specific type and purpose of the organization. ✓ 18. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia? Am If yes, name and address of Registered Agent: 19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Ch �ixtPbv Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code? (If so, attach copy of registration.) Has the organization been granted an exemption from registration byi inia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs? (If so, attach copy of exemption.) ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. Article Description VACA•1n0e1 -Tiup r'op. Z. rO 1 rL*#4,-►e Ctry. C Fair Market Value ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE NOTARIZATION RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION. 20. Does your organization understand that the bingo games shall not be conducted more frequently than two calendar days in any calendar week? 21. Does your organization understand that it is required to keep complete records of the bingo game. These records based on 518.2- 340.6 of the Code of Virginia and §4.98 of Roanoke County Code must include the following: a.,A record of the date, quantity, and card value of instant bingo supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of the supplier of such instant bingo supplies, and written invoice or receipt is also required for each purchase of in- stant bingo supplies? b. A record in writing of the dates on which Bingo is played, the number of people in attendance on each date, and the amount of receipts and prizes on each day? (These records must be retained for three years.) c. A record of the name and address of each individual to whom a door prize, regular or special Bingo game prize or jackpot from the playing of Bingo is awarded? d. A complete and itemized record of all receipts and disburse- ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and annual reports required to be filed, and that these records must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit? 22. Does your organization understand that instant Bingo may only be conducted at such time as regular Bingo game is in progress, and only at such locations and at such times as are specified in this application? 23. Does your organization understand that the gross receipts in the course of a reporting year from the playing of instant Bingo may not exceed 33 1/3% of the gross receipts of an organization's Bingo operation? 24. Does your organization understand it may not sell an instant Bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age? 25. Does your organization understand that an organization whose gross receipts from all bingo operations that exceed or are ex- pected to exceed $75,000 in any calendar year shall have been granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section 501 C of the United States Internal Revenue Service? (Certificate must be attached.) 7 — S 26. Does your organization understand that a Certificate of Occu- pancy must be obtained or be on file which authorizes this use at the proposed location? 27. Does your organization understand that awards or prize money or merchandise valued in excess of the following amounts are illegal? a. No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars. b. No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One Hund- red dollars. c. No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shall exceed One Thousand Dollars, nor shall the total amount of jackpot prizes awarded in any one calendar day exceed One Thousand Dollars. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in 518.2 of the Code.of Virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been answered. Signed by: G 4494"M4 b44- A i Subscribed and sworn before me, My commission expires: My Cemmisjon ExMres $epiamber 2, 1190 19 this day of 19��_ Notary Public RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION TO: COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE P.O. Box 20409 Roanoke, VA 24018-0513 �D-s NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this calendar year. Date C mmiss'oner of t Revenue The above application is not approved. 7 Date Commissioner of the Revenue 9 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 1990 ORDINANCE 31390-7 AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF EASEMENTS FOR A WATER LINE PROJECT, BONSACK INDUSTRIAL PARK BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the acquisition of easements for the Bonsack Industrial Park water line project was held on February 27, 1990. A second reading on this matter was held on March 13, 1990. 2. That these easement acquisitions are for a water line project in the area of the Bonsack Industrial Park on the Botetourt/Roanoke County line. This water line project will provide necessary utility service to this economic development project and the surrounding area. 3. That the properties to be acquired are identified as follows: Botetourt Tax Map Property Owner Acquisition #112(2) B Frances H. Crumpacker, et als Easement #112(2) C Cicero H. Hall Jr. and Doris B. Hall Easement 4. That the consideration for the acquisition of the easements for the water line project shall not exceed forty (40%) percent of the assessment value of the property. 5. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: 'sep/ . ae�� Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Tim Gubala, Director, Economic Development AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 1990 RESOLUTION 31390-8 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for March 13, 1990 designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 7, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - July 25, 1989, July 28, 1989, August 9, 1989 2. Approval of Minutes - January 23, 1990, February 13, 1990, February 20, 1990. 3. Ratification of "Stormwater Management Criteria" Manual. 4. Request for acceptance of portions of Winesap Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 5. Acknowledgement from the Virginia Department of Transportation of the acceptance of 0.14 miles of Twin Mountain Circle into the Secondary System. 6. Donation of a water line easement from Mitchell S. Kaneff. 7. Approval of Raffle Permit for the Botetourt Jaycees. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. r On motion of Supervisor Johnson with Items 1 and 3 removed for a separate vote, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None Item 1 was approved on motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Eddy Following discussion, Item 3 was approved on motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: /. 0-4t�� Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 3/14/90 CC: Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director of Development and Inspections File ACTION # A -31390-8.a ITEM NUMBER 7— AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Ratification of "Stormwater Management Criteria" Manual COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:'7 ,, BACKGROUND: At the Board meeting held January 23, 1990, the Board adopted an Ordinance amending Chapter 8, "Erosion and Sediment Control" of the Roanoke County Code by amending Section 8-11(a), "Control Measures Generally," and a Resolution adopting a new section of the Design and Construction Standards Manual entitled "Stormwater Management Criteria." At that meeting, staff was directed to improve the wording of the "Stormwater Management Criteria" manual and to bring it back to the Board for ratification. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The staff has improved the wording of the manual without affecting its intent. The manual is attached for your review. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends ratification of the "Stormwater Management Criteria" manual. SUBMITTED BY: Arnold Covey, Dire"ct6r Development & Inspectio APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson Denied ( ) motion to approve after Received ( ) discussion on page 16 of Referred the manual CK61H VOTE No Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator I 3 Yes Abs AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 1990 RESOLUTION 31390-8.b REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF WINESAP DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Winesap Drive, from its intersection with McIntosh Lane (Route 1089) to the cul-de- sac, to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as The Orchards Section 3, Applewood Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 54, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on April 13, 1987 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of- way for drainage. 3. That said roads known as Winesap Drive and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H.(Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections, and copy for Virginia Department of Transportation ACTION NO. A -31390-8.c ITEM NUMBER S - 5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of Twin Mountain Circle (Route 2020) into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County has received acknowledgement that the following road has been accepted into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation effective March 2, 1990. 0.14 miles of Twin Mountain Circle (Route 2020) Respectfully submitted, Approved by, &4a Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge Clerk ---------------------------------------------------------------- County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved (y) Motion by: Rob L Johnsen No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson 5 Referred ( ) McGraw x To ( ) Nickens x Robers x cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering MAR f__5 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RAY D. PETHTEL RICHMOND, 23219 OSCAR K. MABRY COMMISSIONER DEPUTY COMMISSIONER March 2, 1990 Secondary System Addition Roanoke County Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke P. 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD: As requested in your resolution dated October 24, 1989, the following addition to the Secondary System of Roanoke County is hereby approved, effective March 2, 1990. Route 2020 (Twin Mountain Circle) - From Route 1079 to Northeast cul-de-sac. Sincerely, Oscar K. Mabry Deputy Commissioner TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY 0.14 Mi. ACTION NO. A -31390-8.d ITEM NO. (,ol AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of a water line easement from Mitchell S. Kaneff to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of a water line easement from Mitchell S. Kaneff to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. The easement is located on a tract of land located in the Bonsack Industrial Park, and is shown on a plat made by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, dated November 7, 1990, said tract is designated on the Botetourt County Land Records as Tax Map No. 112-4. The location and dimensions of this donated easement have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of this water line easement. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by Rnh r._ Johnson Eddy x Denied ( ) Johnson x Received ( ) McGraw x Referred Nickens _ x to Robers x cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities THIS DEED OF EASEMENT, made this _ day of , 1990, by and between MITCHELL S. KANEFF, homme sole, Grantor; the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, Grantee; and ELMER C. HODGE, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, party of the third part. WITNESSETH That for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00), and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantor does hereby GRANT and CONVEY unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns, the following described easement, to -wit: A perpetual RIGHT and EASEMENT, twenty (20) feet in width, to construct, install, improve, operate, inspect, use, maintain, and repair or replace a water line or lines and related improvements, together with the right of ingress and egress thereto, upon, over, under, and across a tract or parcel of land belonging to the Grantor, acquired by deed dated September 13, 1989, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Botetourt County, Virginia, in Deed Book 365, page 640, and designated on the Botetourt County Land Records as Tax Map No. 112- 4. The location of said easement is shown and designated as "20' WATERLINE EASEMENT' upon the plat, dated November 7, 1989, made by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, attached hereto and incorporated herein. TOGETHER WITH a temporary construction easement of an additional fifteen (15) feet for use as a temporary work space and to allow for necessary grading during any phase of construction, reconstruction, repair, or replacement of the water line or lines and related improvements. This conveyance is subject to all easements and liens of record, including but not limited to the access easement described in the deed dated November 21, 1988, between the Greater Roanoke Valley Development Foundation and the Roanoke Valley Development Corporation and Appalachian Power Company recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 355, page 409. The Grantee agrees, as evidenced by acceptance hereof, to restore and repair any damage to the ground surface which may be damaged in the construction of, or in the course of any subsequent entry in relation to, said project. The Grantor agrees that the Grantee will not be expected to restore the property to the identical original condition, but rather as near thereto as is practicable, and that the Grantor will cooperate, at Grantee's expense, with the Grantee in effectuating such restoration. The Grantor further covenants that no building, structure, pavement or sidewalks, fence, trees and shrubbery, or other improvements of any kind whatsoever, shall be erected upon or within the easement herein granted without the written consent of the Grantee, which consent will not be withheld unreasonably. The fixtures, facilities, lines, utilities, and any other improvements placed upon, under, or across the property by the Grantee shall remain the property of the Grantee. It is agreed between the parties hereto that the Grantee and its agents shall have the right to inspect the said water line or lines and related improvements and to cut and clear all undergrowth and other obstructions, in and along the easement or adjacent thereto, that may in any way endanger or interfere with the proper use of the same. The Grantor, by the execution of this instrument, acknowledges that the plans for the aforesaid water line or lines and related improvements as they affect his property have been fully explained to him or his authorized representative. The easement herein granted is in addition to, and not in lieu of, any easement for right- of-way now in existence or which may be acquired in the future. The Grantor covenants and agrees for himself, his heirs, successors, and assigns 2 ✓ - v that the consideration aforementioned shall be in lieu of any and all claims to compensation and damages by reason of the location, construction, operation, maintenance, or reconstruction of or within the easement herein granted so long as such location, construction, operation, maintenance or reconstruction is performed in accordance with the terms of this deed. To have and to hold unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, party of the third part, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance by said Board of Supervisors of the real estate conveyed herein pursuant to Ordinance No. adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. WITNESS the following signatures and seals: (SEAL) MITCHELL S. KANEFF Approved as to form: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA Vickie L. Huffman Assistant County Attorney By 3 Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator (SEAL) State of Virginia, County/City of Roanoke, to -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 1990, by Mitchell S. Kaneff, homme sole. Notary Public My commission expires: State of Virginia, County/City of Roanoke, to -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this — day of , 1990, by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. My commission expires: Notary Public 4 ACTION NO. A -31390-8.e ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of a Raffle Permit from the Botetourt Jaycees COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Botetourt Jaycees have requested a Raffle Permit for a raffle to be held in Roanoke County on April 21, 1990. This application has been reviewed by the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The application is on file in the Clerk's Office. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit be approved. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: �- i��»u✓ ��J2 Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board -------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy _ x_ Received ( ) Johnson W Referred ( ) McGraw To ( ) Nickens X Robers cc: File Bingo/Raffle File COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO Application is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the under- signed applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. All applicants should exercise extreme care to ensure the accura- cy of their responses to the following questions. Bingo games and raffles are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. sec. of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. sec. of the Roanoke -County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investiga- tion prior to granting a bingo or raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Any person violating county or state regulations concerning these permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any person who uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any purpose other than the lawful religious, charitable, community, or educational purposes for which the organization is specifi- cally organized, except for reasonable operating expenses, shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (check one) RAFFLE PERMIT ✓ BINGO GAMES Name of Organi Street Address ,W Mailing Address 4, p, env "<7 ��Agokz,`'A- AA4614,, City, State, Zip Code -DA)„y,Ile _Y,p, a4f%g� Purpose and Type of Organization ,,/.. A *. .� When was the organization founded? ALA 1 Roanoke County meeting place? Las, law Aso CP1gNt-q+,o,J po") Has organization been i existence in Roanoke County for two con- tinuous years? YES NO Is the organization non-profit? YES V1 NO Indicate Federal Identification Number # Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption letter. orj',)r Officers of the Organization: President: 'fob C. ,rz}�u. = gt . Vice-President24a P�W�_ Address: -100 A1OALe CX, Address: 1811� Assjn►J ' Secretary: _ Treasurer: J�J Address: I S BUX /zl Address: RT, I Per 56 -'ko ilul d, IM 2 y / 75 Gov 0 Vlew, t/a i y o ys Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle or Bingo opera- tions: Name � t1tF ��w r Home Address 4 9) q awd44dyatuyE R a3�Q�0� Phone SL(9- y�,>,R Bus. Phone IL A COMPLETE LIST OF THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF CURRENT MEMBER- SHIP MUST BE FURNISHED WITH THIS APPLICATION. Specific location where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted. Qlapv)INN ARP014 RAFFLES: Date of Drawing A6k Z I Time of Drawing 9"OyP1�'/ BINGO: Days of Week & Hours of Activity: Sunday From To Monday From To Tuesday From To Wednesday From To Thursday From To Friday From To Saturday From To 2 State specifically how the proceeds from the Bingo/Raffle will be used. List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use estimates amounts if necessary. C Kik �ST/1iI�1 S F v,< UA1OW 1 1 J4 (GrO c �Il L D,&IV 3� ov o,, o o MifNTA L 89-Acr4 &.soe-iAT�oN MAlAITA/�Nct" 7o (A.M/"UA 3Aya-,r,I-APA15 soo. O C) CYS'T/C Fj8k0S15 LANO �'UNO oars. / 00 3 BINGO: Complete the following: Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted: Name: Address: County State Zip Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization? Seating capacity for each location: Parking spaces for each location: ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1 - 19 1. Gross receipts from all sburces related to the operation of Bingo games or Instant Bingo by calendar quarter for prior calen- dar year period. BINGO INSTANT BINGO 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total 2. Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, associa- tion, organization, partnership, or corporation of any classifica- tion whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or con- ducting Bingo Games or Raffles?yES 3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Bingo games and Raffles, and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? VAS 4. Does your organization understand that the Commissioner of the Revenue or his designee has the right to go upon the premises on which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle, to perform unannounced audits, and to secure for audit all re- cords required to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles? )f ffs 4 5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report must be filed with the Commissioner of the Revenue on or before the first day of November of each calendar year for which a per- mit has been issued? VF S -T� 6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts ex- ceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an addi- tional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later than sixty days following the last day of such quarter? 7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of the permit, and no such organization shall conduct any Bingo game or raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed and a new permit is obtained? VC S 8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, commu- nity, or educational purposes for which the organization is spe- cifically chartered or organized, and that the operation of Bingo games or raffles have been in accordance with the provisions of Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia? 9. Does your organization understand that a one percent audit fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before the first of November? V1.5 -T 10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid only in the County of Roanoke and only at such locations, and for such dates, as are designated in the permit application? 11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a bona fide member of any such organization who shall have been a member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to such participation, shall participate in the management, opera- tion, or conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person shall receive any remuneration for participating in management, operation, or conduct of any such game or raffle? V�5 12. Has your organization attached a check for the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke, Virginia? 13. Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or §18.2- 340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? )f05 5 14. Has your organization attached a complete list of its member- ship to this application form? yjs 15. Has your organization attached a copy of its bylaws to this application form? bs•e,j 41,hr W,j,�, joaa_ aker 16. Has the organization been declared exempt from property taxa- tion.under the Virginia Constitution or statutes? If yes, state whether exemption is for real, personAl property, or both and identify exempt property.,,, �,,„�,�,t�„� hwS ,✓a QrWi da I S2R&Q=g2j6u 17. St11e the s(p`ecinficn type and purpose of the organization. 18. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia? VF 5 If yes, name and address of Registered Agent: l,✓l 50A/ 6-6- i(,94251 v. a Z qzv 'nanto� VX. 2_ qo! D 19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Charitable Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code? (),AJ c/Ld' (If so, attach copy of registration.) Has the organization been granted an exemption from registration by t e Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs? (If so, attach copy of exemption.) ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. Article Description 09 0 CAOILcAC Ci Fair Market Value ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE NOTARIZATION RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION. 20. Does your organization understand that the bingo games shall not be conducted more frequently than two calendar days in any calendar week? 21. Does your organization understand that it is required to keep complete records of the bingo game. These records based on 518.2- 340.6 of the Code of Virginia and 54.98 of Roanoke County Code must include the following: a. A record of the date, quantity, and card value of instant bingo supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of the supplier of such instant bingo supplies, and written invoice or receipt is also required for each purchase of in- stant bingo supplies? b. A record in writing of the dates on which Bingo is played, the number of people in attendance on each date, and the amount of receipts and prizes on each day? (These records must be retained for three years.) c. A record of the name and address of each individual to whom a door prize, regular or special Bingo game prize or jackpot from the playing of Bingo is awarded? d. A complete and itemized record of all receipts and disburse- ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and annual reports required to be filed, and that these records must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit? 22. Does your organization understand that instant Bingo may only be conducted at such time as regular Bingo game is in progress, and only at such locations and at such times as are specified in this application? 23. Does your organization understand that the gross receipts in the course of a reporting year from the playing of instant Bingo may not exceed 33 1/3% of the gross receipts of an organization's Bingo operation? 24. Does your organization understand it may not sell an instant Bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age? 25. Does your organization understand that an organization whose gross receipts from all bingo operations that exceed or are ex- pected to exceed $75,000 in any calendar year shall have been granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section 501 C of the United States Internal Revenue Service? (Certificate must be attached.) F n 26. Does your organization understand that a Certificate of Occu- pancy must be obtained or be on file which authorizes this use at the proposed location? 27. Does your organization understand that awards or prize money or merchandise valued in excess of the following amounts are illegal? a. No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars. b. No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One Hund- red dollars. c. No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shall exceed One Thousand Dollars, nor shall the total amount of jackpot prizes awarded in any one calendar day exceed One Thousand Dollars. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in 518.2 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been answered. Signed by: lv_ d, N,161- 12 % �. W76✓U 6,1(Lf- Name Title Home Address Subscribed and sworn before me, this SL } day of ftr 19�� My commission expires: ak Apr 14 to _1 9q0 RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION TO: COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE P.O. Box 20409 Roanoke, VA 24018-0513 8 0 NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this.calendar year. Date Comm i sioner The Revenue The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue 9