HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/23/1990 - Adopted Board RecordsT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
A HELD AT THE ROAN COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, OCTOBER 23, 1990
ON TUESDAY,
RESOLUTION 102 1 OF CONGRATULATIONS I$ 5TH ANNIVERSARY
E.
COOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
WHEREAS, the Roland E. Cook Elementary School has been
eetin the educational needs of the children of the Vinton area
m 9
for 75 years, having opened its doors in 1915; and
WHEREAS, the facility was originally known as the Vinton
1 and was built at a cost to the County of less than $3,000;
Schoo ,
and School is the
WHEREAS, the Roland E. Cook Elementary
oldest school in the Eastern part of the County, and was named for
nd Eu ene Cook, who served as Superintendent of Roanoke County
Rola 9
Schools from 1906 to 1945; and past 75 years
WHEREAS, there have been peri during the
that the school served as the only educational facility for all
ages of children in the Vinton area; and graduates of the School
WHEREAS, there are thousands of gra
hout the Roanoke Valley and the Commonwealth of Virginia.
throu g
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
ervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on its behalf and on
Su p
behalf of all the residents of Roanoke County, congratulates the
cult , staff and pupils of the ROLAND E. COOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
fa Y
on the celebration of the 75th Anniversary of the School; and
FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of supervisors
extends its deepest wishes for a bright future for both the Roland
E. cook Elementary School and the many children who were educated
in its classrooms.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. A len, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Resolutions of Congratulations File
Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1990
RESOLUTION 102390-2 EXPRESSING SUPPORT FOR THE
INVOLVEMENT OF VIRGINIA TECH IN THE HOTEL
ROANOKE/CONFERENCE CENTER PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Hotel Roanoke has been a landmark in the Roanoke
Valley for over 100 years, and
WHEREAS, the Hotel Roanoke has provided to the City of Roanoke
substantial tax revenues and is a tourism asset to the entire
Roanoke Valley, and
WHEREAS, the City of Roanoke and Virginia Tech recognizes the
opportunities to develop training, continuing education,
conferences and conventions in the Roanoke Valley, and
WHEREAS, the current owner, Virginia Tech Real Estate
Foundation, Inc., and the City have agreed to begin construction
of a conference center and to seek a developer to renovate the
Hotel to its a first class facility, and
WHEREAS, Roanoke County recognizes and supports this project
as vital to the future economic growth of Roanoke City and an
important project to the entire Valley.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, expresses its strong support for the
continued involvement of Virginia Tech in construction and
renovation of the Hotel Roanoke/Conference Center, and
FURTHER, the Board directs that copies of this resolution be
forwarded to officials of Roanoke City and Virginia Tech, and that
a copy be forwarded to the Honorable Douglas Wilder, Governor of
Virginia and the Roanoke Valley legislative delegation.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
The Honorable L. Douglas Wilder, Governor, Commonwealth of
Virginia
The Honorable Noel C. Taylor, Mayor, City of Roanoke
W. Robert Herbert, Roanoke City Manager
Dr. James D. McCormas, President, Virginia Tech
Raymond Smoot, Virginia Tech Real Estate Foundation, Inc.
Roanoke Valley Legislators
i
ACTION #
A-102390-3
ITEM NUMBER -:2:> ` "Z
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 23, 1990
AGENDA ITEM: Appropriation of Funds to Cover the Loss of the
State Matching Grant for the Arts.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS:��u''°^
yfj
BACKGROUND: On June 26, 1990 the Board of Supervisors accepted the
Commission for the Arts' Challenge Grant of $4,250 for FY 1990-
91. Combined with the County's appropriation of $20,000 for
cultural enrichment, the following organizations would have
received a total contribution of $24,250 in FY 1990-91.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On September 28, 1990 staff was notified
that due to a 25% budget reduction in the Virginia Commission for
the Arts budget for the 1990-92 biennium, the Local Government
Challenge Grants have been eliminated for FY 1990-91. Staff has
been told that although the Virginia Commission grant funds will
be reduced next year, there will be matching grant funds available
to local governments in 1991-92.
FISCAL IMPACT: Currently, the County has appropriated $2,500 to
both the Arts Council of the Roanoke Valley and the Symphony. The
Board of Supervisors can leave the funding at this level, with no
additional appropriation necessary. Or, the Board could make up
the loss from the elimination of the Local Government Challenge
Grant by appropriating $4,250 from the Board Contingency to be
split equally between the two organizations referred to above.
VCA
Local
Grant
Appropriation
Total
Arts Council of the
Roanoke Valley
$ 2,125
$ 2,500
$ 4,625
Center in the Square
-0-
15,000
15,000
Roanoke Symphony
2,125
2,500
4,625
4 250
20 000
24 250
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On September 28, 1990 staff was notified
that due to a 25% budget reduction in the Virginia Commission for
the Arts budget for the 1990-92 biennium, the Local Government
Challenge Grants have been eliminated for FY 1990-91. Staff has
been told that although the Virginia Commission grant funds will
be reduced next year, there will be matching grant funds available
to local governments in 1991-92.
FISCAL IMPACT: Currently, the County has appropriated $2,500 to
both the Arts Council of the Roanoke Valley and the Symphony. The
Board of Supervisors can leave the funding at this level, with no
additional appropriation necessary. Or, the Board could make up
the loss from the elimination of the Local Government Challenge
Grant by appropriating $4,250 from the Board Contingency to be
split equally between the two organizations referred to above.
i
ID -Z
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of
Supervisors appropriate the additional $4,250 due to the fact that
we are already four months into the fiscal year and the recipient
organizations have developed their operating budgets with the
understanding that they were to receive this higher level of
support from the County of Roanoke.
Reta R. Busher Elmer C. Hodge
Director of Management & County Administrator
Budget
----------------------------------------------------------------
Approved ( x )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred ( )
To
ACTION
Motion by: Richard W. Robers
to approve
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Eddy x
Johnson x
McGraw x
Nickens _x
Robers x
cc: File
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
ACTION NO. A-102390-4
ITEM NUMBER D - 3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 23, 1990
AGENDA ITEM•
Authorization to upgrade Computer Aided Dispatch system for
Police, Fire and Rescue.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND•
The current computer hardware utilized for the Computer Aided
Dispatch (CAD) system has reached its limits in terms of support
for additional users and/or software. The equipment technology has
become obsolete and vendor maintenance support agreements are
costly. The vendor has offered to allow trade-in credit for the
existing equipment and to provide additional promotional incentives
which allow for a purchase that, combined with lower maintenance
fees of the new equipment, reduces the current monthly operating
costs by approximately $50 Dollars. Beyond the five-year purchase
term, the monthly operating costs can be lowered by as much as
$1,400. Additional appropriations are not required.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
As a result of efforts to encourage customers to replace
obsolete equipment, the CAD hardware vendor has extended trade-in
and promotional incentives which provide a one-time opportunity for
the County to replace current equipment without additional capital
funding while providing a concurrent lowering of operating costs.
The software (CAD programs) will not be affected by this equipment
change. However, the equipment upgrade will provide compatibility
with the County administrative computer, therefore reducing
required support for maintaining differing computer systems. This
reduction in required support is not presented in the dollar
savings, neither is the substantial savings from reduced power
consumption.
The effect of the equipment replacement will be the exchange
of the current computer system having limited capabilities with a
computer that will cover current demands and has no foreseeable
limitation on expansion. With a decrease in the E911 phone
surcharge, there is currently no contingency for equipment
replacement nor for upgrades. Without the current vendor
2D _
incentives, the inevitable required equipment replacement will
result in a request of additional fund appropriations from the
Board.
The following cost information is derived from data in
Attachment 1.
Current equipment hardware and software (MONTHLY
MAINTENANCE) costs equal $2,220.00.
Replacement equipment hardware and software (MONTHLY
MAINTENANCE AND TERM PAYMENT) costs would equal
$2,171.16, a net monthly savings of $48.84.
Beyond the sixty month agreement the hardware and
software (MONTHLY MAINTENANCE) savings will equal
$1,476.00.
FISCAL IMPACT•
The Fiscal Impact from this replacement would be very
positive. Within the first sixty months the monthly operating
expense savings would amount to $48.84 with a period total of
$2,930.40. Beyond the sixty month purchase term period, the
monthly operating expense savings would be approximately $1,400.
Not included in this amount is $350 savings in reduced monthly
power consumption. Engagement in this purchase for equipment
replacement will require NO current or future appropriations.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board approve the replacement of the
equipment and engagement in a five-year lease/purchase agreement.
The vendor extends the trade-in and promotional incentives until
October 31, 1990. Orders placed with the vendor after that date
are not eligible for the incentives. Equipment replacement
witho t the incentives is currently not recommended by the staff.
Res tfully submitted, Appro d ya-'c
b
G
Os D. Bryant Elmer C. Hodge
Director, M.I.S. County Administrator
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred ( )
To ( )
ACTION
Motion by: Harry C. Nickens
to approve
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Eddy X_
Johnson x
McGraw _ X
Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File 2
Oscar D. Bryant, Director, M.I.S.
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Stan Altenhein, Director, Procurement
ATTACHMENT 1.
Current Equipment
CAD COMPUTER MONTHLY COSTS
HARDWARE MAINTENANCE
SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE
TOTAL MONTHLY MAINTENANCE COSTS
New Equipment HARDWARE MAINTENANCE
SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE
TOTAL MONTHLY MAINTENANCE COSTS
Net Monthly Maintenance Cost Savings
Term Agreement ($71,215.80) for 60 months
NET MONTHLY SAVINGS FROM EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
3
_3
$1,400.00
$ 820.00
$2,220.00
$ 379.00
$ 365.00
$ 744.00
$1,476.00
$1,427.16
$ 4884
ACTION NO. A-102390-5
ITEM NO. -D -
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 23, 1990
AGENDA ITEM: Legislative Program for the 1991 session of the
Virginia General Assembly
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Each year the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors considers
adopting a legislative program for submission to the Virginia
General Assembly and for the guidance of staff.
BACKGROUND:
Over the past several months various members of the Board of
Supervisors and several members of the County staff have recom-
mended different topics for consideration for adoption by the Board
as its legislative program for the 1991 session of the Virginia
General Assembly.
The upcoming session will be a "short" session. It appears
that the General Assembly will be primarily concerned with the
Governor's approach to resolving the projected budget revenue
shortfall and with redistricting.
The Board may also want to consider the opportunity to meet
with the members of the local legislative delegation to discuss the
adopted County priorities. In the past the Board has met with our
representatives at a breakfast meeting shortly before the commence-
ment of the session.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The following issues have been recommended as possible topics
for consideration by the Board in adopting a legislative program
for the 1991 session of the Virginia General Assembly:
i) One Tax Bill for County and Town Taxes - This legislation
would authorize the joint collection of taxes by a County
and a town. A single tax bill could reflect both county
and town real estate and personal property taxes, thereby
1
reducing costs and improving efficiency. It has been
suggested that this be a joint submission by the Town of
Vinton and the County.
2) Lottery - This legislation would amend Section 58.1-4022
to provide that a portion of the revenue generated by the
sale of lottery tickets would be returned to the locality
of sale. The Board adopted a resolution in support of
this action on September 12, 1990.
3) Stormwater Utility Fees - This legislation would
authorize local governments to assess user charges to
recover the costs of administering the construction,
operation and maintenance of a stormwater management
program. These charges would be assessed upon all
property owners based upon their contributions to
stormwater runoff.
4) Industrial Access Road Funding - This action would
request the General Assembly to direct the Virginia
Department of Transportation to extend the time for
securing a qualifying industry for industrial access road
funding. The justification for this request is the
current economic condition in the Commonwealth.
5) Human Services Needs - This request seeks State funding
to reach the funding goal of 80/20 reimbursement for
administrative costs, and to fund all positions needed
as shown by caseload standards.
This request seeks block grant funding for residen-
tial care for adolescents (the formula should include
COLA, inflation factors and programs to insure statewide
parity). This would include a legislative mandate for
the Department of Mental Health/Mental Retardation and
Substance Abuse to provide services for children.
On a local level there is a critical need for an
adolescent in-patient unit at Catawba Hospital and for
a public adolescent substance abuse detoxification unit
and a public adolescent residential substance abuse
program. There are also specific public health care
needs for adolescents.
6) Animal Control - Amend Section 3.1-796.86 to require a
current rabies certificate of vaccination as a prere-
quisite for securing a license.
K
7) Collections - Amend Section 64.1-157 to assign the same
priority to the payment of debts of the estate of a
decedent for local taxes as provided debts and taxes due
the Commonwealth (priority #6).
8) Capital Funding - Request funding for the construction
of the Regional Forensic Science Laboratory.
9) Zoning - Restrict the power of the judiciary to revise
or overrule a decision of a local governing body in a
land use matter except in the case of fraud or direct
violation of law.
10) Bingo/Raffles - Authorize the local governing body to
impose up to a ten percent (10%) tax on the gross
receipts of all bingo games and raffles.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board consider the formulation of
a legislative program for Roanoke County for submission to the 1991
session of the Virginia General Assembly. The Board may want to
prioritize or delete the various items listed above. Finally the
Board should advise staff of its preference with respect to
scheduling a breakfast meeting with the local legislative delegati-
on to discuss these issues.
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Motion by
Respectfully submitted,
Action Vote
No Yes Ahs
See BElow
Eddy
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
(1) Lee B. Eddy motion to limit assessment increase each year.
Defeated 4 to 1 voice vote
(2) Lee B. Eddy motion to request limitation in authority of
Courts to overturn zoning decision
Approved Unanimous Voice Vote
(3) Lee B. Eddy motion to allow local authority to tax bingo
profits.
Approved 4 to 1 voice vote
(4) Lee B. Eddy motion to approve legislative program with two
additions approved by board members and deletion of authorizatic-
for Animal Control vehicles to be equipped with flashing lights
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers
NAYS: Supervisor Nickens 3
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
ACTION NO. A-102390-6
ITEM NUMBER Q -S
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 23, 1990
AGENDA ITEM: Recommendation on future appointments to the
Regional Airport Commission
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
In 1986, the General Assembly approved the formation of a regional
airport commission for the purpose of operating the regional
airport facility. The commission is currently made up of five
members, three appointed by the Roanoke City governing body and two
appointed by the Roanoke County, governing body. Roanoke County
has chosen to appoint elected members of the Board of Supervisors,
while Roanoke City has chosen to. appoint Roanoke City staff
officials.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
At their September 12 and October 9 meeting, the Board of
Supervisors requested that staff study other regional airport
commissions bring to the Board a recommendation for future
appointments.
Attached is a list of the localities that were contacted regarding
the composition of their airport commissions. Based on discussion
with other communities there are several general recommendations
regarding the makeup of an airport commission.
o The Commission should be relatively small with only five to
seven members. It is difficult to conduct business and reach
consensus in a timely manner with a larger group.
o Commission membership should include one elected official from
each governing body with the remaining membership composed of
citizens from the business community.
o Membership coming from the community should have business,
finance or marketing expertise. Individuals with aviation or
airline vendor experience tend to focus on the technical
aspects of an airport rather than the overall policy making
decisions.
o With a strong airport manager and staff as the Roanoke
Regional Airport has, local government staff should not be
appointed, but should be available as resources to both the
commission and airport staff.
o The commission should limit itself to policy making and
budgetary decisions and assure that the airport staff is given
the authority to run the day to day operations of the airport.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that a committee be appointed with representatives
from Roanoke City, Roanoke County and the Airport Manager to study
the issue further and bring back a recommendation to both the
Roanoke City and Roanoke County governing bodies. If the committee
recommends a larger membership on the commission, General Assembly
action will be required.
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
----------------------------------- % ------------------------------
Approved (x )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred ( )
To ( )
ACTION
Motion by: Harry C.Nickens
to approve
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Eddy x
Johnson x
McGraw x
Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Regional Airport Commission File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Richard W. Robers, Member, Regional Airport Commission
Bob L. Johnson, Member, Regional Airport Commission
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Operates under a 7 member Airport Authority.
1 - City of Greensboro
4 - Guilford County
1 - Winston-Salem
1 - Forsythe County
3 year terms, maximum of 3 terms.
No requirement to be of any discipline, none are officials except
that one happens to be the Mayor of a town located in the area, but
this is not a pre -requisite.
Information from Stephanie Hunter 919-665-5600
DULLES INTERNATIONAL
11 members as a Board of Directors
1 - Presidential appointee
3 - District of Columbia (Mayor appoints)
2 - Maryland (Governor appoints)
5 - Virginia (Governor appoints)
Members may not now hold public office, must live in the
Washington, D.C. S.M.S.A., and are not paid. The members happen
to be public spirited members who may have been involved in Public
Service in the past and know how the bureaucracy works.
The representative from the Director's office suggested that if the
localities are not responsible for operating deficits, then
consideration should be given to having all at large membership.
If there is liability for operations by the representative
governments, then some membership should be included. The fees and
charges at Dulles are sufficient to cover their costs.
Greg Wolfe 703-739-8745
COMPOSITION OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONS
MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE
6 Appointed by Mayor and 1 appointed by County
Pre -requisites for Mayoral appointments
1 - Engineer
1 - Attorney
1 - Commerce and Industry
1 - Community Leader
1 - Industrial Community involved in aviation (pilot, etc.)
1 - Finance
The County appointee happens to be an engineer who is also a pilot.
The Chairman happens to be a pilot at the present time.
Information received from the office of Larry Cox.
901-922-8077
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA
14 Members of the Commission
4 - Henrico County
4 - Chesterfield County
2 - Hanover County
4 - Richmond
Currently, 6 are elected officials and 8 represent various business
interests. There is no specified mix based on governmental employee,
official, etc. nor on the discipline represented. All members are to
be interested in the Economic Growth of the aviation community and
the Economic Development of the areas served.
Information from Kevin Meers 804-226-3018
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
The airport operates as a department of the City and has a 9 member
advisory council, 3 of which are appointed by the Mayor and 6 by City
Council. Of these members, 2 are to have ties to the aviation
community, 2 from the neighboring area, and the other 5 are at large.
This group advises and makes recommendation to City Council and serve
a staggered 3 year term.
Information from Gene Cannery 704-359-4000
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1990
RESOLUTION NO. 102390-7 AMENDING AND
REENACTING THE POLICIES RELATING TO NON -COUNTY
RESIDENTS PARTICIPATION IN COUNTY ATHLETIC
PROGRAMS
WHEREAS, the Board of County Supervisors has heretofore
established policies relating to participation in County athletic
programs by residents outside the boundaries of Roanoke County;
and
WHEREAS, the Board desires to revise and amend said policies
in order to provide the opportunity for certain non -county
residents to participate in County athletic programs upon certain
terms and conditions; and
WHEREAS, the Board desires to revise the participation policy
in Roanoke County Athletic Leagues to facilitate the formation of
teams; and
WHEREAS, the Board desires to revise said policies by amending
Resolution No. 1585, adopted August 17, 1976.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia:
1. That the provisions of County policies relating to the
participation of non-residents in County athletic programs remain
in full force and effect:
2. That said policies be amended and reenacted by allowing
non-resident youth, who are currently attending Roanoke County
public schools, to participate in Roanoke County athletic programs
upon the following conditions:
a. That each individual participant be currently
enrolled in a Roanoke County public school:
b. That the County Administrator, upon the advice of
the Director of the Parks and Recreation Department, shall have
the right to deny such participation if, in his sole judgement, a
County resident would otherwise be unable to participate in that
athletic program.
3. That this resolution shall be in full force and effect
from and after the date of its adoption.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt resolution, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
cc: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Don Myers, Assistant County Administrator
Steve Carpenter, Director, Parks & Recreation
Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools
Mary Hicks, Executive Secretary
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1990
RESOLUTION 102390-8 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET
FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS
ITEM R - CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board
of Supervisors for October 23, 1990, designated as Item K -
Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to
each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1
through 7, inclusive, as follows:
1. Approval of Minutes - September 25, 1990, October
9, 1990
2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the
Explore Advisory Committee.
3. Request for acceptance of Mill Pond Drive and
Kingsmill Drive into the VDOT Secondary System.
4. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities
serving Heather Park.
5. Resolution of support for a direct highway
connection between Va. Tech and I-81
6. Request to increase Petty Cash for Youth Haven II.
7. Donation of drainage easement from Norma Jean and
Glenda Gale Holbrook.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and
directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items
the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this
resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to approve resolution
with Item #5 removed for discussion, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS: None
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution in
Item #5 after discussion, and carried by the following recorded
vote:
AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Supervisor Eddy
A COPY TESTE:
Az
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
0<4i
ACTION NO. A -102390-8.a
ITEM NUMBER - /-< - z
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 23, 1990
AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the
Explore Advisory Committee
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The following nominations were made at the October 9, 1990 meeting
and should be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors:
Explore Advisory Committee
Supervisor Eddy nominated Buford T. Lumsden to represent the
Windsor Hills Magisterial District.
Supervisor McGraw nominated Edward Kohinke to represent the Catawba
Magisterial District.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recoamended that the above nomination be confirmed.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY:
41-1 x
Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge
Clerk to the Board County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Eddy x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred ( ) McGraw x
To ( ) Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Explore Advisory Committee File
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1990
RESOLUTION 102390-8.b REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
MILL POND DRIVE AND KINGSMILL DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Mill Pond Drive,
from its west intersection with Millwheel Drive to the end of the
cul-de-sac, for a distance of 0.10 miles, and Kings Mill Drive from
its west intersection of Millwheel Drive to the end of the cul-
de-sac for a distance of 0.12 miles to be accepted and made a part
of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229
of the Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and
a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said roads have heretofore been
dedicated by virtue of a certain map\maps known as Woodbridge
Section 11 Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 11, Page
145, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Roanoke County, Virginia, on May 18, 1989 and that by reason of the
recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor
consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-
way for drainage.
3. That said roads known as Mill Pond Drive and Kingsmill
Drive and which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this
Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public roads
to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in
Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official
acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of
Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to approve resolution, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections, and
copy for Virginia Department of Transportation
ACTION # A -102390-8.c
ITEM NUMBER � - `7/
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 23, 1990
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving
Heather Park (Hop -In)
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Developers of Heather Park (Hop -In), Frank R. Radford, have
requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water
and sanitary sewer facilities serving Heather Park (Hop -In) along
with all necessary easements.
The water and sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans
prepared by T. P. Parker & Son entitled Heather Park, dated
March 22, 1989 which are on file in the County Engineering
Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction
meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $5,300.00
and $12,500.00 respectively.
RECOMMENDATION•
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and
sanitary sewer facilities serving Heather Park (Hop -In) along with
all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to
execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities.
SUBMITTED BY:
Cli fo Craig, P.E.
Utility erector
APPROVED:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
ACTION VOTE
Approved (X) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes
Denied ( ) Eddy x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
to Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Abs
A'-,4"
THIS DEED, DEED OF EASEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT, made this 13th day of _
April , 1990 , by and between: Frank R. Radford
hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," party of the first part; the BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, hereinafter referred to as the
"Board," party of the second part; and ELMER C. HODGE, County Administrator of
Roanoke County, VIRGINIA, party of the third part.
: W I T N E S S E T H:
THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits to accrue, the
Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with the covenants of
GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and sewer
lines, laterals, valves, fittings, connections, storage facilities, sources of
water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other equipment and appurtenances
thereunto, in and to the water and sewer systems in the streets, avenues and
public utility and/or sewer line easement areas that have been or may hereafter
be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy
the easements in which the same may be located, all of which is more particularly
shown and described and designated as follows, to wit:
As shown on the plan entitled Heather Park dated
March 22, 19 89 made by T. P. Parker & Son and on file in the
Roanoke County Engineering Department.
K-4
The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible
for the proper installation and construction of the said water and sewer systems
including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for
a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the County and will perform
any necessary repairs at its cost.
Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, party
of the third part, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify
the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No.
adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia.
WITNESS THE FOLLOWING signatures and seals:
A
Title: i-0 LA-) A-)
State of:
County/C -y of: to wit:
Th foregoing deed was ocknQwledyd before me this: Q ,
l�s y of 19
By: il
Duly a orized itle
on behalf of
My Commission expires:
Approved as to form: County Administrator of Roanoke
County, Virginia
County Attorney
State of:
County/City of:
QI
Elmer C. Hodge
to wit:
The foregoing deed was acknowledged before me this:
day of 19
by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia.
Notary Public
My Commission expires:
N i 1
MI qt
r•`
MI
•.c 8 mall
3b6A4
MKrC .
IIr
i PARK
k' ct
tz 14
JVLE'
00
69
NORTH
COMMUNITY SERVICES Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities
ANDDEVELOPMENT Serving Heather Park (Hop -In)
�i
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1990
RESOLUTION 102390-8.d E%PRESSING SUPPORT FOR
THE DIRECT HIGHWAY LINK BETWEEN THE ROANOKE
VALLEY AND VIRGINIA TECH
WHEREAS, the members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia have previously gone on record in support of the
proposed direct highway connection between Virginia Tech and the
Roanoke Valley, and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has
included this project in its six-year plan for transportation
improvements, and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation is
continuing preliminary environmental studies on a proposed route.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board
of Supervisors reaffirms it support for the highway and urges
continued state support for planning, environmental and engineering
studies along the proposed route.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Supervisor Eddy
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Fred Altizer, Jr., Resident Engineer, VDOT
Gordon C. Willis, Sr., Chairman, University Connection
John Milliken, Secretary, VDOT
Steve Musselwhite, Executive Committee, University Connection
ACTION I A -102390-8.e
ITEM NUMBER /-�- - to
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 23, 1990
AGENDA ITEM: Increase of Petty Cash for Youth Haven II
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND: Youth Haven II currently maintains a petty cash fund
of $300, in order to cover residents allowances, recreational
activities, and emergency purchases. The activity level in this
petty cash necessitates an increase from $300 to $500. This
increased level of petty cash would allow for a smooth turn around
of the reimbursement process. Under the current level of petty
cash, the Youth Haven II staff is sometimes at a loss for funds
while the petty cash is being reimbursed.
This petty cash is audited annually by our independent auditors as
well as subject to unannounced audits by the Finance Department in
order to assure that it is being used correctly.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff
of the Youth Haven II petty
z ta'.-'u Z. k6��
Diane D. HyattU
Director of Finance
recommends an increase in the amount
cash from $300 to $500.
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
ACTION
Approved ( x ) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson
Denied ( )
Eddy
Received ( )
Johnson
Referred ( )
McGraw
To
Nickens
Robers
cc: File
Diane Hyatt, Director, FinanceReta Busher Director�outhHaavtl Budget
Bev Waldo, birector,
VOTE
No Yes Abs
ACTION NO. A -102390-8.f
ITEM NO. — r7
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 23, 1990
AGENDA ITEM: Donation of a drainage easement from Norma Jean
Holbrook and Glenda Gail Holbrook to the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This consent agenda item involves the donation of a drainage
easement from Norma Jean Holbrook and Glenda Gail Holbrook to the
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. The easement is located on
a tract of land located at 314 Woodmere Drive in the Lindenwood
Subdivision. It is shown on a plat made by the Roanoke County
Engineering Department, dated August 30, 1990, and designated on
the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 61.19-7-7. The
location and dimensions of this donated easement have been reviewed
and approved by the County's engineering staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of this drainage easement.
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Respectfully submitted,
V'cka L. ik n
Assistant C my Attorney
Action
Motion . ... ..
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
Vote
No Yes Abs
Eddy X
Johnson X
McGraw X
Nickens X
Robers X
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1990
RESOLUTION 102390-9 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS
HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant
to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the
provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia
requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in
conformity with Virginia law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to
the best of each members knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from
open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the
executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and
2. Only such public business matters as were identified
in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed
or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
lir
IV/ 7ci
Mary H. Arlen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Executive Session
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1990
RESOLUTION 102390-10 SUPPORTING THE DESIGNATION OF
PROPERTY OF ROANOKE REBOS, INC. AS EXEMPT FROM TAXATION
BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, Roanoke Rebos, Inc. is a non-profit corporation which
provides meeting space for approximately 500 Alcoholics Anonymous
(AA) meetings per year and personnel support for recovering
alcoholics in the Roanoke Valley; and
WHEREAS, Roanoke Rebos, Inc. owns real estate located in the
Windsor Hills district of Roanoke County which is occupied by a
full time resident manager and which is used as the site for its
sponsored AA meetings; and
WHEREAS, the real and personal property used exclusively for
charitable and benevolent purposes by a qualifying organization
shall be exempt from taxation as authorized by Article X, Section
6(a)(6) of the Constitution of Virginia, pursuant to Section 58.1-
3650 of the Code of Virginia, upon action by the General Assembly
of Virginia and for so long as such organization is operated not
for profit and the property so exempt is used in accordance with
the purpose for which the organization is classified; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia
has considered the following factors before the adoption of this
resolution in support of the tax exempt status of Roanoke Rebos,
Inc. as follows:
1. That Roanoke Rebos, Inc. is exempt from federal income
taxation pursuant of Section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986; and
2. That no current annual alcoholic beverage license for
serving alcoholic beverages has been issued by the Virginia
Alcoholic Beverage Control Board to Roanoke Rebos, Inc. for use on
the organization's property; and
3. That no director or officer of Roanoke Rebos, Inc. is
paid any compensation for service in such position with the
organization; and
4. That no part of the net earnings of Roanoke Rebos inures
to the benefit of any individual. All of the income or assets to
fund the services provided by Roanoke Rebos, Inc. is generated by
funds received from donations or contributions; and
5. Roanoke Rebos, Inc. provides services for the common good
of the public in the form of providing physical locations for
meetings of Alcoholics Anonymous and personnel support for
recovering alcoholics in the Roanoke Valley; and
6. No part of the activities of Roanoke Rebos, Inc. involves
carrying on propaganda or otherwise attempting to influence
legislation. Roanoke Rebos, Inc. does not participate in or
intervene in any political campaign on behalf of any candidate for
public office; and
7. Roanoke Rebos, Inc. has no rule, regulation, policy, or
practice which discriminates on the basis of religious conviction,
race, sex or national origin; and
8. There are no other criteria, facts or circumstances which
this Board of Supervisors deems pertinent to the adoption of this
resolution.
WHEREAS, a public hearing on this proposed resolution was held
a
on October 23, 1990, five (5) days after publication of notice of
such public hearing in the Roanoke Times and World -News on October
17, 1990.
THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County as follows:
1. That this Board supports the request of Roanoke Rebos,
Inc. for exemption from taxation of its real and personal property
pursuant to Article X, Section 6(a)(6) of the Constitution of
Virginia and the provision of Chapter 36 of Title 58.1 of the Code
of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
2. That the County Administrator is directed to forward a
certified copy of this resolution to the members of the General
Assembly representing the County of Roanoke and other political
jurisdictions within the Roanoke Valley with the request that the
proper legislation be introduced in the General Assembly to achieve
the purposes of this resolution.
3. The effective date of this resolution shall be October
23, 1990.
On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt resolution, and carried
by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Roanoke Valley Legislators
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue
Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
John Turner, Roanoke Rebos, Inc.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1990
ORDINANCE 102390-11 TO AMEND THE FUTURE LAND
USE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION OF APPROXIMATELY 175
ACRES LOCATED SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF
ROUTE 460 AND ROUTE 612 (BARLEY DRIVE) AND ARE
ADJACENT TO AND WEST OF THE NORFOLK & SOUTHERN
RAILROAD, IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
FROM DEVELOPMENT TO PRINCIPAL INDUSTRIAL AND
TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM M-1
TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION M-2 WITH
CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
September 25, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was
held on October 23, 1990; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning -Commission held a public
hearing on this matter on October 2, 1990; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Future Land Use Plan map designation of certain
tracts of real estate containing approximately 175 acres owned by
Salem -West Corporation, George H. Fitzwater, and Properties, Inc.
and located south of the intersection of Route 460 and Route 612
(Barley Drive) adjacent to and west of the Norfolk & Southern
Railroad in the Catawba Magisterial District be changed from
Development to Principal Industrial; and
2. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real
estate containing approximately 125 acres (a portion of the
property identified in paragraph 1 above), as described herein,
owned by Salem -West Corporation and located south of the intersec-
tion of Route 460 and Route 612 (Barley Drive) and bounded by
properties of Mary W. Bohon (DB 629, Page 501), Helen Cox Richards
(WB 27, Page 808), a 50' right-of-way, and the remaining property
of Salem -West Corporation, in the Catawba Magisterial District, is
hereby changed from the zoning classification of M-1, Light
Industrial District, to the zoning classification of M-2, General
Industrial District.
3. That this action is taken upon the application of the
Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County.
4. That the applicant has voluntarily proffered in writing
the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby
accepts:
a) That the use of the property will be limited to the
manufacture and assembly of products.
b) That vehicular access will be limited to Route
11/460. No vehicular access will be permitted off of
Yale Drive. Rail access will be permitted to the
property.
C) The height of the principal structures, regulated
by the provisions of the ordinance, on the premises shall
not exceed 60 feet measured from the ground level at the
structure.
d) A buffer zone shall be established from any princi-
pal structure, or outside storage facility to any
property line adjoining existing residentially zoned
property. This buffer zone shall be a minimum of 200
feet.
e) The measured noise emissions from the facility shall
not exceed an average of 80 dba over a 1 hour test period
at the property line adjoining any existing residentially
zoned or residentially used property.
f) Lighting shall be directed away from any adjoining
residential property. Lighting poles shall not exceed
40 feet in height measured from the ground and shall not
exceed a lumen level of approximately 4 foot candles at
the pavement level.
5. That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
BEGINNING at Corner 23, an iron pin located in an old
fence line and being the common corner with the south
line of a 50 foot right-of-way and also, being a common
corner with Daniel Wentworth Richards; thence, with the
south line of said right-of-way in an easterly direction
N. 86° 39' 49" E. 951.31' in all to Corner 24, an iron
pin; thence, continuing with the east line in a northerly
line N. 10° 51' 17" W. 837.94' to Corner 25, an iron pin;
thence, leaving said 50 foot right-of-way and with
property of Daniel Wentworth Richards, deceased (DB 869,
Page 171); thence, in an easterly direction 74° 36' 05"
E. 1,493.81' to Corner 26, an iron pin; thence, N. 300
25' 23" E. 206.001; thence, N. 17° 20' 23" E. 263.001;
thence, S. 10° 55' 57" E. 2,192.44' (along zoning line)
bearing left of Corner 16 and an iron pin; thence,
continuing in a westerly direction S. 13° 45' 07" W.
approximately 1,192.90 feet to Corner 17; thence to 18
(maple snag) N. 69* 43' 04" W.; thence, N. 76* 46' 26"
W. 1,226.95' passing through a gum tree; thence, N. 83°
29' 15" W. 1,562.54' to Corner 20 and existing iron pin;
thence, N. 3° 16' 13" W. 369.48' to Corner 21 and
existing iron pin; thence, N. 880 55' 47" E. 433.61' to
Corner 22 and white oak tree at spring; thence, N. 7° 14'
53" W. 629.52' to the Place of Beginning (Tax Map Nos.
64.02-2-51, 64.02-2-52, and part of 64.02-2-50).
6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts
of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be,
and the same hereby are, repealed.
On motion of Supervisor McGraw to adopt ordinance, and carried
by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1990
ORDINANCE 102390-12 TO CHANGE THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF A X.33 4.267 ACRE TRACT OF
REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF
CATAWBA VALLEY DRIVE APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FEET
SOUTH OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH CARVINS COVE
ROAD, (PART OF TAX MAP NO. 25.00-2-1) IN THE
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF R -E TO THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF M-2 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE
APPLICATION OF LACY G. ALEXANDER
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
August 28, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held
October 23, 1990; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public
hearing on this matter on September 4, 1990; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real
estate containing :7.35 4.267 acres, as described herein, and
located on the west side of Catawba Valley Drive approximately
1,000 feet south of its intersection with Carvins Cove Road, (Part
of Tax Map Number 25.00-2-1) in the Catawba Magisterial District,
is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R -E,
Residential Estate District, to the zoning classification of M-2,
General Industrial District.
2. That this action is taken upon the application of Lacy
G. Alexander.
1
3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the
following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts:
a) Facility will be used for a contractors' equipment
storage yard as listed under ordinance Sec. 21-24-2A (B)
and associated office uses. No other industrial district
uses under Sec. 21-24-2A will be permitted.
b) Type D screening and buffering shall be installed and
maintained along north, west, and south borders. The
east border facing VA 311 shall be screened by Type D
plantings.
C) One Virginia Department of Transportation commercial
entranceway only.
4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the west side of Route 311 (also
known as Catawba Valley Drive); thence, N. 83 deg. 31'
55" E. 198.96 feet to a point; thence a new line through
Burruss Timber Associates S. 6 deg. 28' 05" E. 1077.93
feet to a point; thence with another new line N. 72 deg.
02' W. 206.34 feet to a point on the west right-of-way
of Route 311; thence with Route 311 the following eight
courses: N. 3 deg. 25' W. 207.73 feet; N. 14 deg. 30'
W. 128.00 feet; N. 7 deg. 30' W. 155.00 feet; N. 11 deg.
45' W. 108.00 feet; curve to the right (Radius = 1457.4
feet; Bearing = N. 6 deg. 10' W; Chord = 255.00 feet; Arc
= 255.33 feet); N. 1 deg. 25' 30" E. 215.00 feet; N. 13
deg. 30' W. 118.00 feet; N. 3 deg. 10' 10" E. 18.50 feet
to the point of BEGINNING and containing 4.267 acres, all
as more particularly shown on a plat dated June 15, 1990,
revised September 25, 1990, prepared by John D. Abbott,
P.E., C.L.S., entitled "Survey for Alexander & Son
Contractors."
5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts
of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be,
and the same hereby are, repealed.
F,
On motion of Supervisor McGraw to adopt ordinance and rezone
4.267 acres, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS: Supervisor Eddy
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
3
VICINITY MAP
NO SCALE
100' 0' 100' 200' 300' 4001 500'
1"• 200'
GRAPHIC SCALE
1-2, N. 3- 25'W., 207.73 ft.
2-3, N. 14° 30' W., 128.00 ft.
3-4, N. 7R 30' W., 155.00 ft.
4-5, N. 11° 45' W., 108.00 ft.
5-6, ARC= 255.33 ft., RAD.= 1457.4 ft.,
C.B.= N. 6° 10' W., 255.00 ft.
6-7, N. 1R 25' 30" E., 215.00 ft.
7-8, N. 13° 30' W., 118.00 ft.
8-9, N. 3° 10' 10" E., 18.50 ft.
REMAINING PROPERTY OF
BURRUSS TIMBER ASSOCIATES
TAX MAP 25.00-2-1
D. B. 1185, PG. 743
0� DRAINAGE �6-28--05_'E,_1200.00'_
0 •/ DITCH�_...��
EVERGREEN TREE 5' 20•s.s. EVERGREEN TR Co)
M/ EE - 5' •
20ERG -_
41 n S.6'28.05 E., 1077.93 �p
/ • a o FUTURE 60 OPEN STORAGE M `
my / .•. z 4' BUILDING 100' . • •7 .�'^
�40 FUTURE •M -
FENCE —267A RFS III���JJJJJJ ry
SHED STORAGE BUILDING 60 ••� O
ry
OI ®}{•n•�• VERGREEN S UBS 5'cG,
II DECIDUOUS TREES -I "CALIPER ,30'C,C, 30'E 3 ® n1��
J� n T
N
O O U
- O O
o O
ENTRANCE
CATAWBA VALLEY DR.
N
U U N
N
N N N
O O C V G u 4 u
Y N N H N G O O O O
N
O
ON CREE
0• B. 1213 , PG 7g
SURVEY FOR
ALEXANDER & SON CONTRACTORS
FOR REZONING 8 ACRE TRACT SITUATE ON RT. 311,
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
JOB No.: JOHN D. ABBOTT
REVISED : SEPT. 25,1990 P. E., C.L.S. SCALE: 1_` 200'
NE' CASTLE, VIRGINIA DATE: JUNE 15, 1 I00
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1990
DENIAL OF ORDINANCE 102390-13 TO AMEND
PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON THE REZONING OF A 2.25
ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 4515
BRAMBLETON AVENUE IN THE WINDSOR HILLS
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF B-2, CONDITIONAL, TO THE
ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-21 CONDITIONAL
(AMENDMENT TO PROFFERS) UPON THE APPLICATION
OF SPRINGWOOD ASSOCIATES
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April
24, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held
October 23, 1990; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public
hearing on this matter on September 4, 1990; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law; and
WHEREAS, this property was rezoned from R-1, Residential
District, and B-1, Office District, to B-2, Business District with
proffered conditions, on June 28, 1988.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
DENIED on motion of Supervisor Eddy, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. A len, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1990
ORDINANCE 102390-14 VACATING A PORTION OF A TWENTY (20)
FOOT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT UPON REQUEST OF EDINBURGH
SQUARE FOUNDATION, HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, Edinburgh Square Foundation, the developer of an
adult -care facility known as Edinburgh Greens, has requested the
Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate a
portion of a twenty (20) foot sanitary sewer easement, dedicated
to the County by deed found in Deed Book 562, page 405 in the
Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County,
Virginia; and,
WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia,,
as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the
adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and,
WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1-
431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading
of this ordinance was held on October 9, 1990; and the public
hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on October
23, 1990.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That a portion of a twenty (20) foot sanitary sewer
easement located adjacent to an existing five -story adult -care
facility known as Edinburgh Greens as shown on plat prepared by
Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated 8 August 1990, entitled "Portion
of 20' Sanitary Sewer Easement," said easement dedicated to Roanoke
County by deed found in Deed Book 562, at page 405 in the afore-
said Clerk's Office, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section
15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and,
2. That as a condition of the adoption of this ordinance,
Edinburgh Square Foundation hereby agrees to pay all costs and
expenses required to vacate and relocate this easement and the
sanitary sewer line therein; and,
3. That as a condition of the adoption of this ordinance,
Edinburgh Square Foundation hereby agrees to dedicate to the County
a new twenty (20) foot sanitary sewer easement to replace the
easement described above, and to dedicate to the County a drainage
easement, all as described on the plat described above.
4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts
of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be,
and the same hereby are, repealed.
5. That Edinburgh Square Foundation shall record a certified
copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and
shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transaction.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt ordinance, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
17 .
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning