HomeMy WebLinkAbout1/24/1989 - Adopted Board RecordsACTION # A12489-1
ITEM NUMBER_
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
January 24, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Request of CBL Management for County participation
in extension of water line
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND•
This is the same board report that was presented at the January
10, 1989 meeting. The additional information requested by the Board
will be presented.
CBL Management, Inc., is the developer for the Penn Forest Plaza
Shopping Center on Merriman Road. As part of the development of the
site, CBL is required to install approximately 2500 lineal feet of 12 -
inch water line along Starkey Road which includes boring under the
railroad and highway right-of-ways. The total construction cost of
the water line is estimated to be $126,795.00. In addition, the water
off-site facility fee will be $29,704.60 making the total project cost
$156,499.60. The construction of this 12 -inch water line will benefit
other areas of Starkey Road. It will provide service and supply to
the Crescent Heights water system thus reducing their upgrading cost
as well as provide a portion of a supply line to a proposed water
storage reservoir in Starkey.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
CBL Management, Inc., has requested that theBoardof Supervisors
authorize the credit of the second half of the off-site fee against
the off-site water construction cost. If this credit is approved, the
remaining off-site construction cost to CBL will be $97,090.40. Of
this amount, they are responsible for the full cost of the first 300
feet or $15,213.00, leaving an eligible participation cost of
$81,877.40. CBL has requested that the Board of Supervisors authorize
participation by paying one-half this eligible cost or $40,938.70.
In tabular form, the off-site costs look like this:
Cost of CBL
Cost of Roanoke County
$15,213.00
first 300 feet
$14,852.30
one-half OSF's
40,938.70
participation
14,852.30
second half OSF's
29,704.60
construction in lieu of OSF's
40,938.70
participation
$85,856.30
Total CBL Management, Inc.
$70,643.30
Total County
Total Project Cost: $156,499.60
1
,r-7 -/
The $15,213.00 higher cost indicated for CBL is the cost of the
first 300 feet which is not eligible for credit or participation. CBL
will also pay $7,801.00 as a basic connection fee for the cost of the
meter vault, valves, and meters for a 6 -inch fire service and a 2 -inch
domestic service.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACT:
There are four alternatives to consider:
Alternative #1
The Board of Supervisors would authorize the credit of the second
half of the off-site fees and County participation in the project of
up to $41,000.00. This alternative would result in the County sharing
equally in the excess cost to the developer for this project.
Impact of Alternative #1
The actual utility fund would decrease $55,852.30 as a result of
the credit and participation. In return, the County would receive
2500 lineal feet of 12 -inch water line that we would have installed
eventually without the CBL project. Funds are available in the
utility enterprise fund for this alternative.
Alternative #2
The Board of Supervisors would authorize the credit of the second
half of the off-site fees and deny any additional County participation
in this project. This alternative would result in an off-site water
construction cost to the developer of $126,795.00.
Impact of Alternative #2
The actual utility fund would decrease $14,852.30. Additional
funds are not required for this alternative.
Alternative #3
The Board of Supervisors would not authorize the credit of the
second half of the off-site fees and deny any County participation in
the project. This alternative would result in an off-site water
construction cost to the developer of $141,647.30.
Impact of Alternative #3
The actual utility fund would not decrease. Additional County
funds are not required for this alternative.
Alternative #4
The last alternative involves the Board of Supervisors giving CBL
a reimbursement contract whereby they can recover the eligible cost
from future connection fees collected for connection to this water
2
Z r /
line during the_next five years. CBL has stated that a reimbursement
agreement would not benefit them because they need the financial
assistance at this time, rather than in the future. This alternative
is not viable and, therefore, has no impact.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative #1 with County participation of
one-half the excess cost up to an amount of $41,000.00. This
participation would be in the form of a lump sum reimbursement
agreement payable after acceptance of the water line and verification
of the excess cost by Roanoke County. Additionally, staff recommends
the Board of Supervisors authorize the County Adminstrator to execute
a reimbursement agreement with CBL Management, Inc., to effect this
alternative.
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
Cliffor C ig, P.E�rn�J �.
Elmer C. Hodge
Utility Director Count Administrator
------------------------------------------y---------------------------
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
ACTION
Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/
Lee Garre ,
cc: File
Cliff Craig
Phil Henry
John Hubbard
Reta Busher
Diane Hyatt
Don Myers
3
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Garrett x
Johnson
McGraw �-
Nickens �-
Robers
COMMUNITY SERVICES 12" WL / Proposed Penn Forest
ANDDEVELOPMENT Snopping .Center
ACTION NO.
A12489-2
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: January 24, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Request from the Arts Council of Roanoke Valley
to appropriate funds for an Arts Festival.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR`S COMMENTS:
1/1, ".'-el
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Arts Council of Roanoke Valley is planning a major arts
festival to be held in October 1991. The festival will span ten
days and will celebrate the arts of America. Among other
activities, they hope to include the opening of the new Henry
Street Music Center and the Explore Visitors Center as part of
the project. Such an arts festival would bring additional
tourists and highlight the cultural resources in the community.
If the Explore Project Visitors Center is included, this would be
of particular benefit to Roanoke County.
Approximately $75,000 will be needed to fund an Administrator to
handle organization and implementation of the festival for the
first year. The Arts Council is requesting financial support
from the Roanoke Valley governments as well as local Chambers of
Commerce and Economic Development Agencies. They also plan to
undertake fund raising on a national level. Attached is a copy
of the festival proposal, outlining their objectives.
The Vinton Chamber of Commerce has contributed $50.00 and the
City of Roanoke has committed to a $2,000 contribution. A
similar contribution is being requested from Roanoke County.
ALTERNATIVES
Alternative #1: Allocate $1,000 from the Board Contingency Fund
to the Arts Council of Roanoke Valley for seed money for an Arts
Festival to be held in 1991. If this money is allocated, Roanoke
County may be asked for future contributions to help fund this
project.
Alternative #2: Deny the request of the Arts Council of Roanoke
Valley for financial support of the Arts Festival.
r
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends Alternative #1, and that the Board of
Supervisors appropriate $1,000 from the Board Contingency Fund
for the 1991 arts festival sponsored by the Arts Council of
Roanoke Valley.
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Steven Yes No Abs
Denied ( ) A. McGraw, Alternative #1 Garrett x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
To• Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Susan Cole, The Arts Council of Roanoke Valley
Reta Busher
Diane Hyatt
FESTIVAL PROPOSAL
A major arts festival will encompass all major groups
from the Roanoke Valley.
Approximately $75,000 will be needed to fund an
Administrator to organize and implement the Festival for the
first year. A anonymous challenge has been issued by two
friends of The Arts Council that they will see to it that
the money to begin the Festival is found if the Festival
Committee can secure support and the intent to back the
Festival by the Local Governments, Chambers of Commerce, and
Economic Development Agencies.
The Festival would span a period of ten days in October
of 1991 to take advantage of the scenic beauty our valley
offers tourists. A high level of artistic quality must be
the goal of this festival to bring potential audience in
from surrounding areas, the rest of the state, and from
across the country. A Festival of this scope will require
extensive fund-raising and a national spokesperson who will
lend their name and act as our host. The Committee feels
that fund-raising of this nature must be undertaken on a
national level. The Hearst Corporation for instance, was
the sponsor of the First New York International Festival for
the Arts.
Roanoke has a healthy, vibrant arts community.
Festival will highlight the cultural resources which our
community has worked hard to develop.
The objectives of this Festival are:
- To celebrate the original arts of America.
- To permanently strengthen the arts movement of the
Blue Ridge Region.
- To introduce to the Roanoke Valley and surrounding
region, major national artists and art forms.
- To provide educational access to guest artists
through master classes and workshops in the
schools.
- To demonstrate and further the importance of the arts
to the economy of the region.
- To attract new audiences for the arts from this
region and beyond.
- To have a significant, positive and on-going effect
upon the region's "quality of life."
4'F7`rl�
These objectives were unanimously agreed to by the
spokespersons of the Roanoke Symphony, Roanoke Museum of
Fine Arts, Mill Mountain Theatre, The Arts Council of
Roanoke Valley, City of Roanoke and Roanoke Special Events
Committee, the Southwest Virginia Opera Society, Hollins
College, Roanoke Valley Chamber Music Society, Harrison
Heritage and Cultural Center, Roanoke Valley and Vinton
Chambers of Commerce, Center in the Square, Blue Ridge
Writers Conference, Blue Ridge Film Society, Roanoke Ballet
Theatre, and Roanoke Festival in the Park.
The Festival hopes to include the opening of the new
Henry Street Music Center and the Explore Visitors Center on
the Blue Ridge Parkway.
MM
ACTION # A12489-3
ITEM NUMBER .0 — T
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: January 24, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Claim of Leonard Butler
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
��-c%t7»7i»2.Cr-cam (�t�n.�-o�, ,�J 7G'/� .�%� 0�- c'�(.t�-Y,n � .,v1 .�Lo ii✓ti�
/ � d
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
H. Morgan Griffith, Esquire, attorney for Leonard Butler,
has filed a claim on his behalf with the Board of Supervisors
pursuant to Section 15.1-550, et se . of the 1950 Code of Virgin-
ia, as amended. The basis of Mr. Butler's claim is that some of
his personal affects (see attached list) were destroyed in the
demolition of a dilapidated house acquired by Roanoke County from
Butler for $6,300. The house was acquired by Roanoke County to
facilitate the completion of the road improvements phase of the
Hollins Community Development Project.
Mr. Butler claims that Roanoke County destroyed the house
without notifying him in time to allow for the removal of his
personal affects. However, notices were mailed on December 4,
1987, to all residents of the Hollins Community indicating that
construction of the sewer/water system and road improvements
would begin shortly after January 1, 1988. The demolition of the
house did not occur until January 26, 1988. Therefore, Mr.
Butler was on notice for approximately_ eight (8) weeks prior to
the commencement of road construction and the demolition of the
house.
Mr. Butler has retained an attorney and legal action is con-
templated. A determination by the Board of Supervisors is a
necessary legal step in his efforts to be reimbursed for the
claimed damage due to the destruction of his personal affects.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
$3,750
,E- y
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the claim be denied.
Respectfully submitted,
Sarah A. Rice
Assistant County Attorney
------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION
VOTE
Approved
(x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/
No Yes Abs
Denied
( ) Steven A. McGraw to approve
staffGarrett
x
Received
( ) recommendation to deny claim
Johnson
x
Referred
McGraw
x
To
Nickens
x
Robers
x
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
��lfa�•i1c�j,�� �C�crrtF�
r
AO&, q"W�,
Q �o 250 • "o 7,2 (6, ybew
9,f.9,111.9N
December 14, 1988
Susan Rice, Esq.
Roanoke County Attorney Office
3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W.
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Dear Ms. Rice,
Please find enclosed an appraisal of some of the furniture that
was in Mr. Butler's home, which was the furniture which was destroyed
at Mr. Butler's house when the County burned the house without notice
to Mr. Butler. The total of this appraisal is Three Thousand Seven
Hundred Fifty Dollars ($3,750.00).
Please have your secretary contact my secretary so that we can
set up an appropriate date to bring this matter to the attention
of the Board of Supervisors. I appreciate your cooperation in this
matter, and remain
Sincerely,
C'
H. Morgan iffith
Attorney at Law
HMG: bp
Enclosure
November 21, 1988
RE: Leonard Butler
Items examined by me (all items listed are antique or collectible)
Round Oak Table w/claw feet
$ 450.00
Set of 6 Oak Dining Room Chairs w/claw feet
750.00
Matching Oak Buffet w/claw feet - high back with mirror
400.00
Parlor set consisting of loveseat, rocker, and chair
250.00
Oak Hall Tree with mirror
400.00
Oak ladies writing desk
125.00
250.00
Box glassware, etc.
Box Wedgwood Jasperware, Carnival Glass, mise. sterling
250.00
Brass bed w/large posts
600.00
Oak Wardrobe
275.00
At the time I examined the contents of the boxes, I commented
on the
odd pieces of sterling flatware. Mr. Butler told me that other boxes
in the house contained over 100 sterling spoons and forks which
had been
used by his mother in a tea room she ran at one time.
I did see other pieces of furniture in the house on my vists there, but
did not take special notice of them. A bedroom on the second
floor of
the house was locked and said to contain furniture which had
been in
commercial storage.
I have collected antiques, sold them, and done appraisals for
insurance
purposes for over 15 years.
The prices expressed are my opinion of the current market value of the
items based on my experience. Replacement cost could be substantially
higher.
9Joe G. Kirby, 11
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 24, 1989
RESOLUTION NO. 12489-4 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH
ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J -
CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain section of the agenda of the
Board of Supervisors for January 24, 1989, designated as Item J -
Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to
each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1
through 6, inclusive, as follows:
1. Confirmation of appointment to the Community
Corrections Policy Board.
2. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
Canterbury Park Section 3.
3. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
Canterbury Park Section 4.
4. Request for acceptance of Westbriar Court into the
Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System.
5. Request for acceptance of a portion of Cavalier
Drive and Cavalier Court into the Va. Dept. of
Transportation Secondary System.
6. Acceptance of sewer facilities serving Penn Forest
Wesleyan Church.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
1/26/89
CC: Clifford Craig, Utility Director
Phillip Henry, Engineering Director
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
File
ACTION #12489-4.a
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE January 24, 1989
SUBJECT: Confirmation of Committee Appointments
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The following nominations were made at the previous board meeting
and must now be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. The
nominee has agreed to serve.
Community Corrections Policy Board
Dr. Harry C. Nickens has been nominated by Supervisor Garrett to
serve a three-year. The term will expire on December 21, 1991.
SUBMITTED BY:
Mary H. Allen
Deputy Clerk
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved Motion by: Bob T. Tohnson/flarry Yes No Abs
Denied ( ) ('_ Nickens Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw u
To: Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Community Corrections Policy Board
ACTION #12489-4.b
ITEM NUMBER , —,7—
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: January 24, 1989
SUBJECT: Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
Canterbury Park Section 3
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Developers of Canterbury Park Section 3, Boone, Boone, &
Loeb, Inc., have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed
conveying the water and sewer lines serving the subdivision along
with all necessary easements.
The water and sewer lines are installed, as shown on plans
prepared by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates entitled Section No. 3
Canterbury Park, dated October 17, 1986, which are on file in the
Engineering Department. The water and sewer line construction
meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The values of the water and sewer construction are $99,350
and $35,640 respectively.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept
the water and sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with
all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator
to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities.
SUBMITTED BY:
1
Phillip T: Henry, P//' E.
Director of Engineering
APPROVED:
giy1tN✓"
Elmer C. Hodg
County Administrator
J--
------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Harry No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) C. Nickens Garrett x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
To Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Phillip Henry
Cliff Craig
Reta Busher
Diane Hyatt
2
01
_7
�
VICINITY MAP k BEST / J
, � 7-= .:--"
-1dob_
"M01.819JaI
COMMUNITY SERVICES Acceptance of water and sewer facilities
AND DEVELOPMENT Canterbury Par':, Section 3
3
ACTION #12489-4.c
ITEM NUMBER ,7-- —5
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: January 24, 1989
SUBJECT: Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
Canterbury Park Section'4
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Developers of Canterbury Park 4, Boone, Boone & Loeb,
Inc., have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed
conveying the water and sewer lines serving the subdivision along
with all necessary easements.
The water and sewer lines are installed, as shown on plans
prepared by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates entitled Section No. 4
Canterbury Park, dated October 22, 1986, which are on file in the
Engineering Department. The water and sewer line construction
meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The values of the water and sewer construction are $14,075
and $22,575 respectively.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept
the water and sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with
all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator
to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED:
Phillip T. Henry, P. $'.
Director of Engineering
Elmer_ C. Hodg?
County Administrator
Approved (x >
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
ACTION
Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Harry
C. Nickens
cc: File
Phillip Henry
Cliff Craig
Reta Busher
Diane Hyatt
2
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Garrett x
Johnson x
McGraw x
Nickens x
Robers x
NORTH
Y�, C ••G , • 1�511410 w•�19 ,
f►moo �. v � ► 5 • , �
1 1 •f s
4 20 a 42 %a
04
b` • 4
• a � titi '•i u
17 3
2 �• ;� '' 21 41
j,
S4-" _
19 a,a1
40
a i ,t•� -22
w 2 w J J!O! d ••
0
30
O „ 1
• � 34 21 24
,
33 3
3,2
K „ . fat. !� �• J+
.• AJf t, i
J2 J 2S li �t �• »
!sx 24
23 22 f s
s
23
J1 ���� 26 !!f�
26
r 27
30
27 1
29
0 86 01
4
4 17 O,
g �
Acceptance of water and sewer facilities
COMMUNITY SERVICES Canterbury Park, Section 4
AND DEVELOPMENT
3
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 24, 1989
RESOLUTION 12489-4.d REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
WESTBRIAR COURT INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Westbriar Court
from its intersection with Cavalier Drive to the terminus at the
cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.16 miles, to be accepted and made
a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section
33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road has been
decicated by virtue of a certain map known as Section No. 4
Canterbury Park Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book
10, Page 44, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on February 5, 1987, and that
by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board
of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the
abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby
guarantees said right-of-way for drainage.
3. That said roads known as Westbriar Court and which is
on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the
same is hereby established as a public road to become a part of
the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only
from and after notification of official acceptance of said
street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections, and
copy for Virginia Department of Transportation
K
f
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 24, 1989
RESOLUTION 12489-4.e REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF A
PORTION OF CAVALIER DRIVE AND CAVALIER COURT
INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Cavalier Drive
from a point 120' west of its intersection with Gloucester Court
to the intersection with Salisbury Drive and 0.05 miles of
Cavalier Court from its intersection with Cavalier Drive to the
terminus at the cul-de-sac, to be accepted and made a part of the
Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the
Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said roads have been
dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Section No. 3
Canterbury Park Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book
10, Page 33, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on December 17, 1986, and that
by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board
of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the
abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby
guarantees said right-of-way for drainage.
3. That said roads known as Cavalier Drive and Cavalier
Court and which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this
Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public
roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways
in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official
acceptance of said streets or highways by the Virginia Department
of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections, and
copy for Virginia Department of Transportation
2
ACTION #12489-4.f
ITEM NUMBER `T
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: JANUARY 24, 1989
SUBJECT: Acceptance of sewer facilities serving Penn Forest
Wesleyan Church
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Developers of Penn Forest Wesleyan Church have requested
that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the sewer lines
serving the building along with all necessary easements.
The sewer lines are installed, as shown on plans prepared by
Buford T. Lumsden and Associates entitled Penn Forest Wesleyan
Church, dated March 23, 1988, which are on file in the
Engineering Department. The sewer line construction meets the
specifications and the plans approved by the County.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The value of the sewer construction is $4844.00
respectively.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept
the sewer facilities serving the development along with all
necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to
execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities.
SUBMITTED BY:
Phillip T. ,Henry, P.E:
Director of Engineer-ing
APPROVED:
Elmer C. Hodge'
County Administrator
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
ACTION
Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Harry
C. Nickens Garrett
Johnson
cc: File
Phillip Henry
Cliff Craig
Reta Busher
Diane Hyatt
2
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
� CD
VOTE
No Yes Abs
_ x
_ x
_ x
_ x
x
NORTH
Acceptance of Sewer facilities serving
COMMUNITY SERVICES Penn Forest Wesleyan Church
AND DEVELOPMENT
3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 24, 1989
ORDINANCE 12489-5 ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR
AND AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF SURPLUS
PROPERTY NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF HUNTING
HILLS DRIVE AND STARKEY ROAD
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of
the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been de-
clared to be surplus and is being made available for other public
uses, i.e. road improvements; and
2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of
the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the
sale and disposition of the hereinafter described property was
held on January 10, 1989; a second reading was held on Jan-
uary 24, 1989; and
3. That this property is an abandoned pumping and
valve station located on property owned or formerly owned by the
Hunting Hills Land Corporation near the intersection of Hunting
Hills Drive and Starkey Drive; and
4. That the offer of the Virginia Department of High-
ways in the amount of $1,634.00 is hereby accepted and all other
offers are rejected; and
5. That all proceeds from the sale of this property
are to be allocated to the capital reserves of the County; and
6. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe-
cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro-
4V
perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County
Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Robers and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
is
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 24, 1989
ORDINANCE 12489-6 AMENDING AND REENACTING
THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR A
PROHIBITION UPON THE LOCATION OF CERTAIN
TYPES OF SIGNS
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, recognizes that "general advertising" signs (bill-
boards) are becoming a blight upon the County, and that this is
the functional equivalent of a public nuisance, adversely affect-
ing the appearance of the community, aesthetics, vitality, the
enhancement of property values, as well as the value of the
County's commercial and residential areas, and that such signs
constitute a traffic hazard adversely affecting the traffic safe-
ty in the County; and
WHEREAS, Section 15.1-510 of the 1950 Code of Virginia,
as amended, authorizes any county to adopt such measures as it
may deem expedient to secure and promote the health, safety, and
general welfare of the inhabitants of the county, and further
that the provisions of Chapter 18 of Title 15.1 (Section 15.1-837
et seq.), and that Section 2.01 of the Roanoke County Charter
(1986 Acts of Assembly, Chapter 617) authorize the adoption of
this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held
on January 10, 1989, and the second reading of this ordinance was
held on January 24, 1989.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
Sec. 1. Definitionq_
Sign. Any display of any letters, words, numerals,
figures, devices, emblems, pictures, or any parts or combinations
thereof, by any means whereby the same are made visible for the
purpose of making anything known, whether such display be made
on, attached to, or as a part of a structure, surface, or any
other thing, including but not limited to the ground, any rock,
tree, or other natural object which display is visible beyond the
boundaries of the parcel of land on which the same is made. This
definition includes the supports, uprights, bracing, and frame-
work of any structure, be it single-faced, double-faced, v-type
or otherwise, exhibiting a sign.
General advertising sign. A sign which directs atten-
tion to a product, commodity, or service not conducted, sold, or
offered upon the same lot or parcel where such sign is located.
Sec. 2. Prohibited signs. No general advertising sign shall be
located within the county.
Sec. 3. Vested rights. Nothing in this ordinance shall be con-
strued to authorize the impairment of any vested right to an
existing general advertising sign and that those signs in use at
the effective date of this ordinance may be continued.
If any change in title or possession or renewal of a
lease of any sign or sign structure that is the subject of this
ordinance or any lot or parcel upon which a sign or sign struc-
ture is located occurs, then the use of that sign or sign struc-
ture may be continued. If any sign or sign structure is discon-
tinued for a period exceeding two years after the effective date
2
of this ordinance, then it shall conform to the provisions of
this ordinance.
The construction of a sign or sign structure for which
a permit was legally issued according to the provisions of the
Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance prior to the effective date of
this ordinance may proceed and continue; provided, that the con-
struction of said sign and sign structure is completed within
thirty (30) days after the effective date of this ordinance.
Any sign or sign structure which would otherwise be
prohibited by the provisions of this ordinance may not be ex-
tended or enlarged. Any sign or sign structure which is
destroyed or damaged in any manner to the extent of the cost of
restoration to its condition before the occurrence shall exceed
fifty (50) percent of the cost of reconstruction may not be
repaired or restored unless it is in compliance with the provi-
sions of this ordinance.
Sec. 4. Violations. Any violation of the provisions of this
ordinance shall constitute a Class 1 misdemeanor and be punished
as provided in Section 1-10 of this Code.
In addition, the County Administrator on behalf of the
Board of Supervisors shall have all necessary authority to admin-
ister and enforce the provisions of this ordinance, including the
bringing of legal action to insure compliance with the ordinance,
including injunction, abatement or other appropriate action or
proceeding.
3
Sec. 5. Severability. In the event that any portion of this
ordinance is held to be invalid, such invalidity shall not affect
the other valid portions of this ordinance.
Sec. 6. Effective date. The effective date of this ordinance
shall be January 25, 1989.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning
Claude Lee, Zoning Administrator
Michael Kavanaugh, Sheriff
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney
Magistrate
Sheriff's Department
Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Roa 24016
Main Library
Resolution/Ordinance File
Roanoke County Code Book
Roanoke County J&D Court, Intake Counsellor
J
ACTION # A12489-7
ITEM NUMBER 8 - 3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER
MEETING DATE: January 24, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Petition of Jolly Time, Inc. for a Special
Exception Permit to operate an amusement and video arcade
located at 4394 Electric Road in Tanglewood Mall in the Cave
Spring Magisterial District.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS
013
a
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION
See attached Staff Report.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the request for a Special
Exception Permit with the condition cited at the end of the
staff report.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY:
Ddu-
Dale
Castellow
Acting Director of Planning
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Steven A. McGraw with Garrett _ x _
Received i ) condition (1) Hours of Johnson x
Referred operation for the arcade McGraw _ x _
To should not exceed the Nickens _ x _
operating hours of the malRobers x
cc: File
Dale Castellow
Terry Harrington
Elmer C.
Hodge
County Administrator
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Steven A. McGraw with Garrett _ x _
Received i ) condition (1) Hours of Johnson x
Referred operation for the arcade McGraw _ x _
To should not exceed the Nickens _ x _
operating hours of the malRobers x
cc: File
Dale Castellow
Terry Harrington