HomeMy WebLinkAbout2/28/1989 - Adopted Board Records0
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE RONAOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989
RESOLUTION 22889-1 EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE
POARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO ART
WHITTAKER FOR OUTSTANDING CONTRIBUTIONS TO HIS
COMMUNITY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
WHEREAS, the service of Piedmont Airlines to the
Roanoke Valley has been important to the residents and businesses
of the area; and
WHEREAS, Art Whittaker has worked for Piedmont Airlines
since August 1948, and spent the last 22 years as Station Manager
at the Roanoke Regional Airport; and
WHEREAS, Art Whittaker has been responsible for the
operation of Piedmont's airplanes in and out of Roanoke and has
contributed greatly to the impressive efficiency and safety
record of the company in the Roanoke Valley; and
WHEREAS, Art Whittaker has been an active member of the
Cave Spring community in which he resides and has benefited the
citizens of Roanoke County by his involvement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on behalf -of the --
citizens of Roanoke County, and on its own part, expresses
appreciation to Art Whittaker for over 40 years of dedicated
service to the citizens of the Roanoke Valley.
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors extends its best
wishes for a happy, restful and productive retirement.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
4
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Resolutions of Appreciation File
2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989
RESOLUTION 22889-2 APPROVING THE FISCAL
YEAR 1989/90 OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE
ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION
WHEREAS, Section 17 of the contract between the City of
Roanoke and Roanoke County, Virginia, requires the Roanoke Region-
al Airport Commission to prepare and submit its operating budget
for the forthcoming fiscal year to the Board of Supervisors of
the County and the City Council of the City prior to February 15
of each year; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission trans-
mitted its 1989-90 budget to the City of Roanoke and Roanoke
County by letter dated February 14, 1989; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission
adopted its fiscal year 1989-90 annual operating budget at its
February 14, 1989, meeting; and
WHEREAS, it appears that estimated revenues shall once
again exceed estimated expenses.
NOW, THEREFORE it is hereby resolved by the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the annual operating budget for fiscal year
1989-90 of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission is hereby
approved.
2. That the Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
is hereby directed to forward a certified copy of this resolution
to the Chairman of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission, and
to Jack Spain Jr., Esquire, Hunton & Williams, Richmond, Virgin-
ia.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisorsilohnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
W. Robert Herbert, Chairman, Roanoke Regional Airport
Commission
Lee Garrett, Vice -Chairman, Roanoke Regional Airport
Commission
Jack Spain, Jr., Esquire, Hunton & Williams
Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council
E
ITEM NUMBER D--3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: February 28, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Request from the Registrar for an Appropriation of
Funds for Primary Elections
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S, -`COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
The State Republican Party has called for a primary election
to be held on Tuesday, June 13, 1989. Since this action was not
anticipated during,the preparation of the 1988-89 fiscal year
budget, it is necessary that we come to you, the Board of
Supervisors, at this time requesting that $23,855.00 be
appropriated to the Registrar's Office from the Unappropriated
Balance.
This appropriation will cover the cost of salaries for the
election officials at each of the election poll sites, the cost
of moving and setting up the voting machines, the cost of printed
materials, the cost of handling absentee ballots, and any other
costs associated with this special election. These estimates
have been derived from the actual costs incurred during the
primary election in March 1988, and have been scaled accordingly,
since only one party is participating in this primary. None of
these monies -are reimbursable by the State.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACT:
FISCAL IMPACT:
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the appropriation in the amount of
$23,855.00 be made from the Unappropriated Balance.
Respectfully Submitted: Approved By:
ohn M. Chambli s, Jr. Elmer C. Hodge
Assistant Administrator County Administrator
Approved (X-)
--= UZned ( }
Received ( )
Referred
To
ACTION VOTE
Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/
Bob L. Johnson to approve
cc: Elizabeth Leah
Reta Busher.
File
John Chambliss
No Yes Abs
Garrett x
Johnson x
McGraw x
Nickens x
Robers x
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989
RESOLUTION 22889-4 RESCHEDULING A REGULAR
MEETING SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 13, 1989
WHEREAS, by Resolution 1489-2 adopted on January 4,
1989, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County established a
regular meeting schedule for the Board of Supervisors for calen-
dar year 1989; and
WHEREAS, a primary election will be held on June 13,
1989, a date previously scheduled for a regular meeting of the
Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Resolution 1489-2 establishing a certain regu-
lar meeting schedule for the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
is hereby amended by canceling the meeting scheduled for June 13,
1989; and
2. That the meeting scheduled for June 13, 1989, is
hereby rescheduled to Wednesday, June 14, 1989, at 3:00 p.m. at
the Roanoke County Administration Center at 3738 Brambleton Ave-
nue; and
3. That the County Administrator shall cause a copy of
this Resolution to be posted at the Roanoke County Courthouse,
the Roanoke County Administration Center, and each County
library, and to be advertised in the Roanoke 'Times and World News
on May 30, 1989, and June 6, 1989.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
c
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
2 _ - -
ACTION # A-22889-5
ITEM NUMBER--I>-,S
AT A REGftAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: February 28, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to initiate a sanitary sewer project
for the Highfields/Lakeland Road Area
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND•
Sixteen residents that live along Highfields and Lakeland
Road have petitioned Roanoke County to supply public sanitary
sewer service under provisions of the County Code. A copy of the
petition and a map of the area is attached.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
It is requested that the Board of Supervisors establish a.
special sewer service area as indicated on the attached map so
that a special sewer connection fee for the area can be made. It
is further requested that the Board of Supervisors authorize
Staff to complete a sufficient engineering study to establish the
cost of a sewer project to serve the special service area. Upon
completion of this study, staff would notify the affected
property owners of the proposed project and provide them with a
service agreement. The agreement would include the not to exceed
special sewer connection fee and state that the project was
contingent upon final approval by the Board _of_Supervis_ors._ -_ -
Depending on the number of residents executing agreements,
the special sewer connection fee for public sewer service will be
between $4,000.00 and $5,000.00 per lot. This sanitary sewer
project would only serve the petitioned area and no County cost
participation is planned.
After receipt of agreements from the affected property
owners, Staff will present a detailed report of the project for
final approval by the Board of Supervisors._ _
1)-.5
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize
Staff to initiate this project and establish a special sewer
service ar4ea as delineated on the attached map along with the
special connection fee for this area. It is further recommended
that Staff be authorized to send notice of the project and
agreements for service 'to all property owners within the special
service area in order that a commitment to the project can be
made by the residents.
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED:
a4x r--�A--" A C 1140J,
Cliffor ig, P. . Elmer C. Hddge
Utility Director KCounty Administrator
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (X) Motion by: Lee Garrett/ No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Harry C. Nickens to app wP Garrett x
Received ( ) recommendation Johnson - - - x -
Referred McGraw x
to Nickens x
Robers x
cc:
File
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
Phil Henry, Director, Engineering
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
d�
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED HMXMEPS OF TBE HIGHFIELDS RD, LAKEDALE RD ASSOCIATION,
DO RMLEST ••M TBEaxwyOF RaWKE, VA THATSEWER SEMaCE BE '',• 11 aI TO
• I• RIGHT TO THIS PETITIONHAS BEEN GRANTED BY THEMMKE =MY :• •/•
OF SUPERVISORS.
N*lE ADDRESSEI• • E
Birl,
i,.•�_G _ ...ice _ �/ / ,
x
7 7;"-3 6-9Y
�;Yr- ?-os-�D
--7_7y_ 2- (71
ACTION # A-22889-6
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: February 28, 1989
AGENDA ITEM•
Authorization to initiate a water project for the
Old Hollins Road Area
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
AfI
BACKGROUND:
In November, 1989, forty-six residents along Hunters Trail
and Olde Tavern Road requested the County provide a public water
system to their area. During a preliminary concept design
conducted by County staff, it was determined -that such a water
system could be constructed along with an upgrade of- the existing.
water system serving Old Hollins Road and the Ardmore area.
The Old Hollins Road area has low-wat:er.pressure-that
requires industries such as Ingersol Rand and AMP to construct
their own storage and pumping in order to provide adequate fire
protection. The Ardmore area along Garman Road is served by a
well that has a very low quality water and also can not provide
water for fire protection.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
By developing a water project that will provide -full water -----
service to both the existing Old Hollins-RdAd/Ardmore.area , as
well as the Hunters Trail/Olde Tavern Road area, the overall cost
of the eventual system will be reduced. The estimated cost of
this project is $368,000.00.
Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors authorize this
project contingent upon at least forty-six residents in the
affected new service area signing an agreement to participate in
and provide part of the financing of this project.
Staff further requests that the Boa _rd__�f a -r _v1%'Qrr - - -
establish a special water service area as 1ndie_a_ fid._ on --
h e -_:-:
attached map which includes the properties along Shadwell Drive
and in the Belleview Gardens and Belleview Estates subdivisions. --
1
The purpose of this special water service area is to designate an
area that will have a specific water connection fee assigned for
a period of six years following the completion of the
above-mentioned water project.
It is proposed that a special water connection fee of
$4,000.00 per equivalent residential connection be established
for this area. The normal off-site facility fee of $1,036.00 is
included within the special $4,000.00 and is credited against the
cost of off-site construction as provided for in the water
ordinances for those residents that execute agreements with the
County within 90 days of Board final approval of the project.
They would be required to pay $500.00 of the $4,000.00 connection
fee within 90 days of the Board's final approval of this project.
The remaining $3,500.00 could be paid at the same time or the
County would finance the $3,500.00 at 7 1/2% for a period not to
exceed six years.
Any other water connections made within this special service
area during its six year period of existence would be required to
pay the $4,000.00 special water connection fee plus the normal
off-site facility and basic connection fee. No credit would be
made nor would any of the fee be financed by the County. For
example, a normal residential water connection made within this
special service area at the current rate would be $5,536.00 for``
those connections not signing an agreement with the -County-within
--
the 90 days of Board final approval for this project. -- - - -
After receipt .of agreements from the affected property
owners, Staff will present a detailed report of the project=for
final approval by the Board of Supervisors, along withanordinance to effect this project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommeded the Board of Supervisors authorize Staff to
initiate this project and establish a special water service area
as delineated on the attached map along with the special
connection fee for this area. It is further recommended --that --
Staff be authorized to send notice of the project-- and -agreements ----_.
for service to all property owners within the special service
area in order that a commitment to the project can be made by the
residents.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED:
1
Clifford r ig, P.E. Elmer C. Hodge
Utility Director
y County Adminis rat— r r-`-
2
ACTION VOTE
Approved (X) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/ No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Steven A. McGraw to approve Garrett x
Received ( )� staff recommendation Johnson �R—
Referred McGraw �—
to Nickens
Robers
cc: File
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
Phil Henry, Director, Engineering
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
3
`oLLc6E
^I,iBTJ 0 L r4
-��
.• �w ..::L.aI♦I
W"
oOrrr«w
.797
e�
t
Al �+
Site '.
'
VICINITY MAP � � --
r.
-Q-
NORTH
COMMUNITY SERVICES ROAD AREA
AND DEVELOPMENT_. -
4
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989
RESOLUTION 22889-7 AUTHORIZING THE
ISSUANCE AND SALE OF THE COUNTY OF
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, REVENUE ANTICIPATION
NOTES, SERIES 1989A IN THE AMOUNT
$9,000,00x:•.
r
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors ("Board") of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") adopted a resolution on
February 14, 1989, authorizing the County to borrow not to exceed
$17,000,000 and issue its revenue anticipation notes therefor;
WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is necessary
and expedient to borrow $9,000,000 and to issue its Revenue
Anticipation Notes, Series 1989A therefor ("Notes") to meet
casual cash flow deficits of the County; and
WHEREAS, bids have been taken for the purchase of the
Notes, and the County desires to specify the form and details of
the Notes and to award the Notes to the bidder whose proposal
results in the lowest interest cost to the County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia:
1. The Board of the County determines that it is
advisable to contract a debt and issue and sell the Notes in an
aggregate principal amount of $9,000,000. The issuance and sale
of the Notes are authorized. The proceeds from the sale of the
Notes shall be used to meet casual cash flow deficits of the
County.
2. The Notes shall be issued in bearer form, without
privilege of registration and without coupons, in substantially
the form attached as Exhibit A. The Notes shall be dated as of
the date of their issuance and delivery, shall be issued in
denominations of $25�;-000 shall be numbered N-1 and upward,
sequentially, shall bear interest at the annual rate of 6.98%
payable at maturity, and shall mature on June 15, 1989. The
Notes shall not be subject to payment or redemption before
maturity.
3. The County Administrator and Treasurer of the
County are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Notes,
and the Treasurer is hereby authorized to affix or imprint the
seal of the County on the Notes. The form of execution,
imprinting of the seal and attestation may be by facsimile;
provided, however, if the signatures of the County Administrator
and Treasurer are both by facsimile, the Notes shall not be valid
until authenticated by the manual signature of the Paying Agent.
In case any officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose
signature shall appear on any Note shall cease to be such officer
before the delivery of the Notes, such signature or such
facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all
purposes the same as if he or she had remained in office until
such delivery. Any Note may bear the facsimile signature of or
may be signed by such persons as at the actual time of its
execution are the proper officers to sign such Note al though at
the date of delivery of such Note such persons may not have been
such officers. Upon receipt of payment therefor, the Treasurer
2
of the County or such agent as may be designated, shall issue and
deliver the Notes to the purchaser or purchasers thereof. The
officers and agents of the County are further authorized and
t
directed to do all acts required by the Notes and by this
Resolution for the fulY, punctual and complete performance of all
things necessary for this borrowing.
4. Crestar Bank, Richmond, Virginia is appointed as
Paying Agents for the Notes. The principal of and interest on
the Notes shall be payable in lawful money of the United States
upon surrender of the Notes on the maturity date at the principal
corporate trust office of the Paying Agent in Richmond, Virginia.
5. The Board agrees on behalf of the County that the
proceeds from the issuance and sale of the Notes will be invested
and expended as set forth in the Non -Arbitrage Certificate of the
County to be delivered at the time of the issuance and delivery
of the Notes and -that the County will comply with the covenants
and representations contained therein. Further, the County shall
comply with the reporting requirements of Section 149(e) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
6. The Board determines that it is in the best
interest of the County to accept the bid of Central Fidelity Bank
to purchase the Notes and such bid is accepted.
7. The officers and agents of the County are
authorized and directed to take such further action as may be
necessary or convenient in connection with the issuance, sale and
delivery of the Notes and all actions previously taken by such
3
officers and agents in connection therewith are ratified and
confirmed.
8. The Offering Circular with respect to the sale of
k
the Notes is hereby approved in substantially the form submitted
at this meeting and :the County Administrator is authorized to
execute and deliver the Offering Circular with such changes,
additions and deletions as he deems appropriate.
9. The appropriate officers and agents of the County
are authorized and directed to immediately cause a certified copy
of this Resolution, setting forth the form and details of the
Notes, to be filed with the Circuit Court of the County pursuant
to Sections 15.1-199 and 15.1-212 of the Code of Virginia of
1950, as amended.
10. This Resolution shall take effect immediately.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Supervisor Garrett
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance (Lwo certified copies)
Reta Busher, Director, Mangement & Budget
Don Myers, Assistant County Administrator
Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney (one certified copy)
4
N-
i
EXHIBIT A
$25,000
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTE
SERIES 1989A
The COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA (the "County"), for
value received, acknowledges itself indebted and promises to pay
to BEARER upon presentation and surrender of this Note on
June 15, 1989, the sum of TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($25,000),
together with interest thereon at the rate of 6.98 percent
(6.98°x) per annum payable at maturity. Both the principal of and
interest on this Note are payable in lawful money of the United
States of America upon presentation and surrender of this Note at
the principal corporate trust office of Crestar Bank, Richmond,
Virginia.
This Note is one of a series of Notes in the aggregate
principal amount of $9,000,000 authorized by the Board of
Supervisors of the County by resolutions adopted on February 14,
1989, and February 28, 1989 (the "Resolutions"), pursuant to the
Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and
5
particularly Section 15.1-545 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as
amended, and is issued for the purpose of meeting casual deficits
in the revenue of the County and creating a debt in anticipation
t
of the collection of revenue of the County.
This Note is,' ,not subject to redemption before maturity.
It is certified and recited that all acts, conditions
and things required by the Constitution and statutes of the
Commonwealth of Virginia to happen, exist or be performed
precedent to the issuance of this Note have happened, existed or
been performed in due time, form and manner as so required and
that the indebtedness evidenced by this Note is within every debt
and other limit prescribed by the Constitution and statutes of
the Commonwealth of Virginia.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia, has caused this Note to be signed by
the facsimile_. signatures of its County Administrator and a
facsimile of the Seal of the County to be affixed and attested by
the facsimile signature of the Treasurer of the County and this
Note to be dated March 8, 1989.
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
By
County Administrator
County of Roanoke, Virginia
0
Attest:
:r
Treasurer
County of Roanoke, Virginia
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION
l
This Note is one of the Notes described in the
within -mentioned Resolutions.
CRESTAR BANK, as Paying Agent
By
Its Authorized Representative
A
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989
RESOLUTION 22889-8 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH
ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I -
CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain section of the agenda of the
Board of Supervisors'for February 28, 1989, designated as Item I
- Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as
to each item separately set forth in said section designated
Items 1 through 11, inclusive, as follows:
1. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Court
Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family
Services Advisory Board
2. Approvel-ef-Raffle-Permit-for-the-Cade-Spring
Jayeees-
3. Adoption of Resolution of Appreciation to the
Honorable Jack B. Coulter, Judge of the 23rd
Judicial Circuit.
4. Authorization to grant 40' easement to Appalachian
Power Company.
5. Acceptance of a 10 -foot water line easement being
dedicated by Dominion Bank.
6. Request for acceptance of Huntridge Road and
Britany Road in the Va. Department of
Transportation Secondary System.
7. Request for acceptance of Kildeer circle and
Falcon Ridge Road into the Va. Department of
Transportation Secondary System.
8. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
Section No. 2, Huntridge
9. Acknowledgment from the Virginia Department of
Tansportation that the following roads have been
accepted into the Secondary System:
a. 0.11
miles
of
Fox Ridge Road
b. 0.40
miles
of
Peregrine Crest Circle
C. 0.25
miles
of
Fox Ridge Road
d. 0.15
miles
of
Silver Fox Road
10. Acceptance of sewer facilities serving White
Subdivision.
11. Acceptance of a sanitary sewer easement being
donated by Velma G. Edwards.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Robers with Item 2 removed, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
3/2/89
CC: Clifford Craig, Utility Director
Phillip Henry, Engineering Director
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
File
ACTION # A -22889-8.a
ITEM NUMBER__f- I
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM•
February -,28, 1989
Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Court
Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family
Services Board
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND
The following nomination was made at the previous board
meeting and must now be confirmed by the Board of Supevisors. The
nominee has agreed to serve.
Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services
Advisory Board
Supervisor Johnson nominated Gary Minter to serve a two-year term
replacing Marilyn Morehead. His term will expire March 22, 1990.
SUBMITTED BY:
Mary Allen
Deputy Clerk
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (X) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/Richard No Yes Abs
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
W. Robers Garrett
x
Johnson
X
McGraw
X
Nickens
x
Robers
X -
cc: File
Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services
Advisory Board File
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989
RESOLUTION 22889-8.b OF APPRECIATION
TO THE HONORABLE JACK B. COULTER
UPON,HIS RETIREMENT AS JUDGE
OF T11t 23RD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
WHEREAS, The Honorable Jack B. Coulter became judge of the
23rd Judicial Circuit in 1975, and has served the citizens of the
Roanoke Valley with dignity and honor; and
WHEREAS, Judge -Coulter not only served the citizens through
his career as a judge, but through membership in many civic
organizations and his interest in youth activities; and
WHEREAS, those activities included President of the Roanoke
Jaycees, Vice Chairman and member of the Roanoke City School
Board, member of the Board of Directors of the Roanoke Chamber of
Commerce, member of the Board of Directors of the Roanoke
Y.M.C.A., membership in numerous legal organizations, as we-11--as-
teaching,
ell asteaching, lecturing and coaching youth sports activities; and -
WHEREAS, in recognitions of these endeavors, he was named
Father of the Year for Youth Leadership, received the Jayceee'
Distinguished Service Award, and the Military Order of World
Wars' Patriotic Award; and
WHEREAS, Judge Coulter has distinguishes^-h-ims�-i
his legal career and sponsored many innovations in the courtroom
designed to ease the responsibilities of jurors, attorneys, and
those whose cases were being heard.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, wishes to -express- deepest
appreciation and the appreciation of its citizens to The
Honorable Jack B. Coulter, Judge of the 23rd Judicial Circuit,
for his many years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to
t
Roanoke County; and
FURTHER, the Boaed of Supervisors extends its best wishes
for a happy, restful, and productive retirement.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
WIN
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors -
cc: File
Resolutions of Appreciation File
2 -
ACTION # A -22889-8.c
ITEM NUMBER,
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: February"28, 1989
SUBJECT: 40' Utility Easement being granted to Appalachian Power
Company by the County of Roanoke
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Project 84-1-S, Starkey Sewage Pumping Station. The Project
will require the granting of an easement crossing property owned
by Roanoke County for the installation of an electrical service.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors grant the
Easement and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed
in a form approved by the County Attorney conveying the easement.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED:
Phillip T. Henry, P. E
Director of Engineering
ey //
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Richard W. Ro ers _Garrett x -- -
Received ( ) - - ---------Johnson - x - -
Referred McGraw x
To Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
. I `I
VICINITY MAP
6588
or Annie Hollow F?4
`�. 6600
12 1
10
a 38 AC
F 12 66M
14 1.00 At
Z -3 0_.� 1.50ido
13 99 15
`Proposed 401
1 ,�Utility.Easement
Pump Station
• .1791 Ac ca
R CBS z
15
10.90 Ac (0)
12 20 Ac (C) 6069 Ile
14
1 41 Ac
401 Utility Easement BeinGranted to
COMMUNITY SERVICES Appalachian Power Co By he County
of Roanoke
AND DEVELOPMENT 2
h*4
ACTION # A -22889-8.d
ITEM NUMBER J.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIR'INIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
February'�8, 1989
SUBJECT: Acceptance of -a 10 -foot water line easement being
dedT ted to the County of Roanoke by Dominion Bank
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Project 89-1-W, Starkey Road - Fallowater Lane Water Line
will improve the flow characteristics of the Avenham Water System.
The project will require the acquisition of a water line easement
crossing property owned by Dominion Bank located at the
-
intersection of Fallowater Lane and Bernard Drive in the Cave --
Spring Magisterial District. - -
............_.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept the
easement and authorize the County Administrator__to_�exe_cute--de-ed---
in a form approved by the County Attorney conveying the easement.
SUBMITTED BY:
. &� �e
Phillip T. fienry, P.E.
Director of Engineeri g
APPROVED:
��/V
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator __
------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ No Yes Abs
Denied ( {) Richard W. Ro ers Garrett x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
To Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
2
O
NORTH
10' WATER LINE
EASEMENT
(D Iti
I
IS 330 00, 00" W
'_ IIIA
TAX MAP N0. 87.09-2-9
W
0
N C
M 0
tf'
co
Acceptance of a 10 -foot water 1-ine--e-aseme-nt---
COMMUNITYSERVICES being dedicated to the County of=Roanoke y --
AND DEVELOPMENT
.ANDDEVELOPMENT Dominion Bank
0; 3
30, R/W
FALLOWATER
0�8
LANE
N47038'
Q
5762'
/
Id WATER LINE
EASEMENT
10' WATER LINE
EASEMENT
(D Iti
I
IS 330 00, 00" W
'_ IIIA
TAX MAP N0. 87.09-2-9
W
0
N C
M 0
tf'
co
Acceptance of a 10 -foot water 1-ine--e-aseme-nt---
COMMUNITYSERVICES being dedicated to the County of=Roanoke y --
AND DEVELOPMENT
.ANDDEVELOPMENT Dominion Bank
0; 3
i
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989
iRESOLUTION 22889-8.e REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
HUNTRIDGE ROAD AND BRITANEY ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Huntridge Road
from its intersection with Springer Road to the cul-de-sac for a
distance of 0.32 mile and Britaney road from its intersection
with Springer Road to its intersection with Huntridge Road for a
distance of 0.14 miles to be accepted and made a part of the
Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the
Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty (50) to (60) foot right-of-way for said roads have
been dedicated by virtue of a certain map/maps known as Section
No. 2 Huntridge Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book
10, Page 12, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on June 27, 1986 and that by
reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of- _--____._,.---
viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the
abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby
guarantees said right-of-way for drainage.
3. That said roads known as Huntridge Road and Britaney
Road and which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying --this
Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public
roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways
in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official
4
acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department
of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McCraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Arnold Covey, Director, Developmen & Inspections, and
copy for Virginia Department of Transportation
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989
t
RESOLUTION 22889-8.f REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
KILDEER CIRCLE AND FALCON RIDGE ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT Or -TRANSPORTATION ROAD SYSTEM
Y
BE IT RESOLVED by'the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Kildeer Circle a
section of toad extending from Hunting Hills Drive (Route 1541)
in a southerly direction to a cul de sac for a distance of 0.09
miles and Falcon Ridge Road extending from Hawkbill Circle (Rt.
1938) in a westerly direction to Hunting Hills Drive (Rt. 1541)
for a distance of 0.40 miles. Pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1,
Paragraph C-1 and funded pursuant to Section -33.1-75.1, Paragraph
—
A of the Code of Virginia, of 1950 as amended.
2. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of
Virginia and unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necessary
easements for drainage as recorded in Plat Book 8, Page 5 and
Plat Book 8, Page 48, dated December 15, 1971 and June 6, 1973,
respectively, and deeds of later dates, all of record in the.
Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office.
3. That this Board does certify that these roads were open
to public use prior to July 1, 1978, at which time it was open to
and used by motor vehicles.
4. That this Board does certify that speculative interests
are not involved.
5. That said roads known as Kildeer Circle and Falcon
Ridge Road which are shown on a sketch accompanying this
resolution be, and the same is hereby established as public roads
i
to become a part of the state secondary system of highways in
Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official
acceptance of said street or highways by the Virginia Department
of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
V. Q -L -U /Z') - -- ---- - --- -- - --
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors'
cc: File --
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections and
copy for Virginia Department of Transportation
ACTION # A -22889-8.g
ITEM NUMBER .1— O
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: February.,'.28, 1989
w
SUBJECT: Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
Section No. 2 Huntridge
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Developers of Section No. 2 Huntridge, Roanoke County
Land Venture, Inc., have requested that Roanoke County accept the
Deed conveying the water and sewer lines serving the subdivision
along with all necessary easements.
The water and sewer lines are installed, as shown on plans
prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers & Surveyors entitled
Section No. 2 Huntridge, dated February 28, 1984, which are on
file in the Engineering Department. The water and sewer line
construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by
the County.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The values of the water and sewer construction are $46,420
and $110,450 respectively.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept
the water and sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with
all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator
to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities.
SUBMITTED BY:
Phillip T. He ry,P. E.
Director of Engineering-,
APPROVED:
B ff-
Elmer
C. Hodge
County Administrator
------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Richard W. Ro ers Garrett x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
To Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
VICINITY MAP
L �
i
j T --
Acceptance
-
NORTH
Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
COMMUNITY SERVICES Section No. 2 Huntridge
AND DEVELOPMENT 3
ACTION # A -22889-8.j
ITEM NUMBER .7—/
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
February 28, 1989
Acceptance of a sanitary sewer easement being
donated by Velma G. Edwards
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Velma G. Edwards is donating an easement to the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County for the location and construction
of a fifteen (15) foot wide off-site sanitary sewer line for the
Duxbury Court subdivision.
This easement is located across Lot 4, Block 1, Section 1,
Beverly Heights North in the Catawba Magisterial District of
Roanoke County.
Pursuant to Ordinance No.
1987, the Board authorized the
donations or dedications of
matters.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
1027874 adopted on October 27,
County Administrator to accept
non -controversial real estate
It is recommended that the Board favorably consider this
acceptance under the consent agenda.
Respectfully submitted,
------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (C) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Richard W. Robers Garrett x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred 4 McGraw X
To Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
1
I �� ��
PROPfR1Y OF
I,AN9MAXX PROpfa/lfb, INC.
..J�
7700' g
.� N79fVIM
7 14.00'
NEW 6ANITARY �� :• :
N f44EMENl �NQ
G0f 4 QI,
� � � N
b
N �.
n 479
v, m
u, �� In
m z EXrSIrNG
.. pn'Ea4�RC� ImM
v � Fxr51. 90'MrN. gurc9�NG GENE
N 19'01'30"E. 5.00=.� i
Frr51 10'x!5' 4uY �
fASFAIFNI
A" ••x579'01'80"11'
01-60'
Guat•f "A" '
GA HW PY00R pRIVE
A - $I
b. = A 79' 39'00"w
PLAT SHOWING
NEW SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
-
BEING GRANTED TO
ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
BY
VELMA G. EDWARDS
SITUATED IN
LOT 4, BLOCK 1, SECTION 1
BEVERLY IIEIGIITS NORTH (P.B. 7, PAGE 55). •._
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
SCALE: 1" - 30' DATE: 12 JANUARY 1989
- - -
BUFORD T. LUMSDEN Et ASSOCIATES, P. C.
ENGINEERS -SURVEYORS
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
'•' COMM. ' 19 4V
B
ACTION # A -22889-8.i
ITEM NUMBER �_ t d
AT A REGdLAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
February 28, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of sewer facilities serving
White Subdivision
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The developers of White Subdivision, Section 1, Dominion
Builders, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed
conveying the sewer lines serving the subdivision along with all
necessary easements.
The sewer lines are installed as shown on as -built plans
prepared by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates entitled Sanitary
Sewer Extension, plan number 88-328, dated January 25, 1989. ---The
sewer line construction meets the specifications and the plans
approved by the County.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The value of the sewer construction is $4,200.00.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept
the sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all
necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to
execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED:
G�'
C1iffor aig, Elmer C. -Hodge-_ -- - ---- ---
Utility Director County Administrator_:
1
.17-/o
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (X)k Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Richard W.Ro ers Garrett x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred i.:' McGraw x
to Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
2
LorA
.70,7 re 64 9
st $far yip0000, Seto
10
4(c NI
SO
13
"A
16
14 15
$134
rr
9,14. 7
15? 84 Ac
Club
2. oz gr43
S. -/v ors,
Is
0 Al
Ury
200
r's"
AC
1.2
9 75 Ac
COMMUNITY SERVICES ACCEPTANCE OF SEWER
AND DEVELOPMENT SERVING WHITE SUBDIVISION
ACTION # A -22889-8.h
ITEM # I=?
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: February.,28, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Addition -to Virginia Department of Transportation
Secondary System
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Roanoke County has received notification from the Virginia
Department of Transportation that the following roads have been
accepted into the Secondary System effective February 16, 1989:
a. 0.11
miles
of
Fox Ridge Road
b. 0.40
miles
of
Peregrine Crest Circle
C. 0.25
miles
of
Fox Ridge Road
d. 0.15
miles
of
Silver Fox Road
SUBMITTED BY:
Mary H. Allen
Deputy. Clerk
APPROVED BY:
�et�-
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (X) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/Richard No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) W. Robers Garrett X
Received ( ) Johnson X
Referred McGraw X
To Nickens X
Robers X
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
COMMONWEALTH EAI,'I H of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1401 EAST BROAD STRCfT
RAY D. PETHTEL RICHMOND 23219
OSCAR K. MABRY
COM MIS SIp NFR
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
February 16, 1989
Secondary System
Additions
Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors
County of Roanoke
P. 0. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018
MEMBERS OF THE BOARD:
As requested in your
resolution dated November 25,
1986, the
following additions to the
Secondary System of Roanoke
County are
hereby approved, effective
February 16, 1989.
ADDITIONS
LENGTH
HUNTING HILLS - SECTION 20
Route 1420 (Fox Ridge Road)
- From Route 1541 to
Route 1421 -North.
0.11 Mi.
Route 1421 (Peregrine Crest
Circle) - From Route
1420 -North to Route 1421 -South.
0.40 Mi.
Route 1420 (Fox Ridge Road)
- From Route 1421 -South
to Route 1422.
0.25 Mi.
Route 1422 (Silver Fox Road)
- From Route 1420 to
West cul-de-sac.
0.15 Mi.
Sincerely,
Oscar K. Mabry
Deputy Commissioner
1RANL�i'!!I: ;^,;;_j; AOR [H[ 21ST C! NIURY
ACTION NUMBER A-22889-9
ITEM NUMBER IV— I
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
t
MEETING DATE: February 28, 1989
SUBJECT: Receipt of Consultant's Report on Landfill Siting and
Request to Proceed with Part A Application Process
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The search for a new landfill site for the Roanoke Valley began
more than a year ago. Since that time, staff and the landfill
consultant, Olver, Incorporated, have evaluated more than fifty
sites and have identified the six most feasible for your considera-
tion. Attached is a report from Olver, Incorporated ranking the top
six sites. Following a report to the Board by the consultant, staff
will request permission to forward to the State two of these sites
for Part A reviews. After careful review of the consultant's work,
visits to each site, and work sessions with the Board, I recommend
proceeding with the first two sites, Bradshaw and Boones Chapel. It
should be understood that all six sites have potential if the _Board
wishes to choose others. Each Part A application _will__cnst_
approximately $46,000, so it is not advisable to submit all six at
one time. The two top sites are recommended because they have the
best socio -technical characteristics.
The Bradshaw site, with a matrix score of 291, is clearly the
best location, as indicated by the consultant's report. It
consistently scored the highest points with all of the evaluation
methods. It has the proper soil conditions, impacts the fewest
homes, and has a 60 -year expected life. At this time, we feel
certain that an access road can be constructed from the Dixie
Caverns exit of I-81, so that landfill vehicles will not use
Bradshaw Road. The cost of constructing the access road will be
less than upgrading existing roads to industrial standards and will
reduce travel time for refuse vehicles.
The second site recommended for the Part A review is Boones
Chapel with a matrix score of 214. Although staff expects the
Bradshaw site to be Permitted by the State, a second one should be
submitted for concurrent review in the event that it is not. The
Boones Chapel site was ranked second by the consultant - because it
has an expected 25 -year life and meets the established criteria If
chosen, electricity will have to be extended to the area and roads..
will have to be improved. Otherwise, this is -a convenient,------- -
technically suitable alternative to the Bradshaw site.
-2 -
The Buck Mountain site, which has a matrix score of 224, would
have been second in the ranking. However, due to a projected life
of only 15 years, I have eliminated it from consideration. Of the
remaining sites, Mount Pleasant, with a matrix score of 210, and
Fort Lewis, 201, are so close that I cannot recommend one over the
other as a third choice., to send for Part A review. Red Hill
received the lowest score -of these six, which was 158.
Based on the above,- staff prefers to withhold consideration of
these sites, pending State review of Bradshaw and Boones Chapel.
Because the top two sites are technically and socially acceptable,
and because submitting Part A applications is expensive, it makes
more sense to reserve the remaining four sites for future use if
necessary.
Having worked closely with the staff and the consultant, I
believe we have achieved the balance required by the Board.
Throughout the process, you have stressed the need to locate a new
landfill that is technically sound, feasible to construct and
operate, while at the same time minimizing the impact on the
communities. The Bradshaw site in particular is an excellent site
and will provide suitable landfill space for the County and our
neighbors for many years. Vinton, Roanoke City, and Salem have
expressed an interest in participating, so it is important that we
find a site large enough to include them. While the State performs
Part A reviews, the County should conclude the contractual arrange-
ments with these localities. The Roanoke Valley should also
continue pursuing the possibility of constructing an additional
landfill with Bedford County as well as increase regional recycling
efforts. This would benefit all the jurisdictions by extending
landfill life and reducing transportation costs.
In conclusion, I would like to commend the Citizens Landfill
Advisory Committee, John Olver and his staff, and John Hubbard for
the thorough and compassionate way they have approached this most
difficult task. We regret any disruption to the neighborhoods of
the County and commend the Board for the emphasis on compensating
those affected.
RECOMMENDATION:
FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT:
Each application submitted for Part A review wi11 cost;.,.$46,000. _-
-3 -
SUBMITTED BY:
44'.1-4
Elmer C. Hodge
Roanoke County Administrator
RESOLUTION REQUIRED: Yes X No
A C T I O N
V 0 T E
Yes No Abs
Approved (X) Motion by: Richard W. Robers/ Garrett x
Denied ( ) Steven A. McGraw to approve Robers x
Received ( ) staff recommendation for Johnson x
Referred Bradshaw Road Site and McGraw
to Boones Chapel Site Nickens �-
cc: File
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance