HomeMy WebLinkAbout6/14/1989 - Adopted Board RecordsAT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989
RESOLUTION 61489-1 REQUESTING APPROVAL TO THE
VIRGINIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE
PROPOSED MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOUSING
DEVELOPMENTS KNOWN AS THE GROUSE POINTE
APARTMENTS AND HIGHGATE APARTMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia as follows:
WHEREAS, the Virginia Housing Development Authority is
considering the financing of two multi -family residential housing
developments to be situated in Roanoke County; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 36-55.39 (B) of the Code of
Virginia, the Virginia Housing Development Authority is required
to request from the governing body of the locality a Certificate
of Approval or Disapproval and certified resolution expressing
its approval or disapproval; and
WHEREAS, The Planning Director for Roanoke County reviewed
the development proposals for Grouse Pointe Apartments and
Highgate Apartments and determined that both projects conform to
the County's zoning and subdivision regulations and comprehensive
plan policies.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby grant its approval to the
proposed multi -family residential housing developments known as
the Grouse Pointe Apartments and Highgate Apartments; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the action of the Board of
t
Supervisors on May 9, 1989 to deny approval of the proposed
developments is hereby rescinded, and that a certified copy of
this resolution be sent to the Virginia Housing Development
Authority informing them of the Board of Supervisors approval of
the proposed development projects.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to rescind action of
May 9, 1989 and adopt prepared resolution, seconded by Supervisor
Johnson, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
6/16/89
CC: File
Virginia Housing Development Authority
Terry Harrington, Director of Planning
Lewis Jamison, Old Heritage Builders
• ti
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989
RESOLUTION 61489-2 REQUESTING SPECIAL ALLOCATION
OF REVENUE SHARING FUNDS FROM VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION TO IMPROVE GIVENS AVENUE (ROUTE 1109),
ROADS IN HUNTING HILLS SUBDIVISION AND CHAUCER'S
COURT (ROUTE 1794)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That, Resolution 5989-12.c is hereby recinded.
2. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
application of Roanoke County for Givens Avenue (Route 1109),
property owners along Chaucer's Court (Route 1794, and the
developers of Hunting Hills Subdivision for drainage and road
improvements.
3. That in accordance with Section 33.1-75.1 of the Code
of Virginia, 1950, as amended, State matching allocation is
available to improve, maintain, construct, or reconstruct State
Highways within the County.
4. As an inducement to adopt this resolution, Old Heritage
Corporation (Developer of Hunting Hills Subdivision) and the
property owners of Chaucer's Court have agreed to pay to the
County's General Fund the equivalent amount of the local share
needed for the State's matching allocation and will deposit these
funds with the Roanoke County Treasurer's Office within 30 days
upon receiving notification that the Commonwealth Transportation
Commission has approved State matching allocation for these two
projects.
5. That, Roanoke County has presently or will make
available from County General Funds the local share of the
drainage improvements on Givens Avenue upon receiving
notification by the Commonwealth Transportation Commission of the
approval of the State's matching allocation.
6. That, Roanoke County and the Virginia Department of
Transportation construct drainage improvements on and adjacent
to Givens Avenue, improve roads in Huntings Hills Subdivision,
and Chaucer's Court, and that funds be allocated for the local
share of these projects and be available to the Virginia
Department of Transportation at the appropriate time.
7. That, the Virginia Department of Transportation and the
Commonwealth Transportation Commission is hereby requested
pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1 of the State Code, to make
available an equivalent matching fund allocation for the
improvements of the following priority projects:
Priority #1: Drainage Improvements on Givens Avenue -
Revenue Sharing Request = $32,500.
Priority #2: Roadways In Hunting Hills Subdivision -
Revenue Sharing Request = $87,500.
Priority #3: Road Improvements on Chaucer's Court -
Revenue Sharing Request = $22,500.
in the total amount of $142,500 or the adjusted amount made
available to Roanoke County.
8. That the County Administrator of Roanoke County or his
designee be authorized to take such action and execute such
61
documents as may be necessary to accomplish these projects, upon
form as approved by the County Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Robers, seconded by Supervisor
Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Reta Busher, Director, Mangement & Budget
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspection
and Copy for Virginia Department of Transportation
3
ACTION NUMBER # A-61489-3
ITEM NUMBER Z -.3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
June 14, 1989
Approval of Contract for Employee Health Insurance
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
The county staff annually reviews employee health insurance
coverage and makes recommendations to the Board of Supervisors on
the level of benefits and premium amounts paid by employees in
the county. This review was conducted by D. K. Cook, Director of
Human Resources, and Diane D. Hyatt, Director of Finance, and we
are pleased to report to you that our claims experience has been
favorable for the current contract year. County staff also used
the services of an independent health insurance consultant in the
review of proposed alternatives. The county's current contract
with Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Virginia expires June 30, 1989.
In the review of alternatives for the contract year beginning
July 1, 1989, a renewal proposal was obtained from Blue Cross/
Blue Shield of Virginia. For the current contract year, esti-
mated health insurance claims, contributions by the county,
and contributions by employees are projected as follows:
Estimated Claims Paid on Behalf of Employees $750,000
County Contributions 475,000
Employee Contributions 275,000
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The proposal negotiated with Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Virginia
contains a moderate increase due to increasing utilization and
health care trends. Health care costs are rising approximately
20% per year, although our experience in utilizing health care
costs has been much less. In the proposal submitted, the county
will be able to maintain the same level of benefits with no
reduction in services provided. The prescription drug program
will be continued with payment in full after a deductible is paid
for each prescription. Under the present plan, payment in full
is made after a $6 deductible is paid by the employee for each
prescription for brand name drugs and a $4 deductible is paid for
generic drugs. The deductible for brand name drugs will be
increased to $10, and the deductible for generic drugs will be
decreased to $2 in order to encourage the purchase of generic
drugs as a savings in the group's health care costs. The deduct-
ible in the prescription drug program is the only change in the
coverages or co -payment deductibles recommended for the contract
year. The alternatives considered by county staff are presented
to you in this report.
ALTERNATIVE l:
In this alternative, the traditional funding arrangement with
Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Virginia is continued. Blue Cross
would continue the payment of claims, pre -admission review, and
managed care. The Blue Cross/Blue Shield plan offers the
advantage of participating physicians, in that medical providers
agree to accept the usual, customary, and reasonable charges
established by Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Virginia. The plan also
offers the advantage in the claims forms acceptance among most
medical providers. The county would also continue to receive
hospital discounts for the participating hospitals in the Blue
Cross/Blue Shield of Virginia network. The proposed rates for
this alternative would be as follows:
Blue Cross/Blue Shield Rate
Cost to Employee *
Increase to Employee
Monthly
HealthnT surance Rates
Employee
Family
$98.73
$240.02
26.25
126.32
10.77
24.64
*This cost reflects the county contribution of $45, and an addi-
tional health care supplement from the county of $250,000
approved in the 1989-90 county budget.
ALTERNATIVE 2:
In this alternative, the traditional funding arrangement with
Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Virginia is continued. Blue Cross
would continue the payment of claims, pre -admission review, and
managed care. The difference between this alternative and
Alternative 1 is that no additional cost increase is proposed for
county employees, although additional funds in the amount of
$92,000 would be required from the unappropriated balance for the
county to fund additional costs. The proposed rates for this
alternative would be as follows:
Blue Cross/Blue Shield Rate
Cost to Employee *
Increase to Employee
Monthly
Health Insurance Rates
Employee Family
$98.73 $240.02
15.48 101.68
0 0
*This cost reflects the county contribution of $45, and an addi-
tional health care supplement from the county of $250,000
approved in the 1989-90 county budget, plus $92,000 from the
unappropriated balance.
r / '
a)-3
FISCAL IMPACT:
In the comparison of Alternative 1 and Alternative 2, the county
would continue the traditonal funding arrangement with Blue
Cross/Blue Shield of Virginia. In Alternative 2, additional
funds in the amount of $92,000.00 would be required from the
unappropriated balance for the county to fund additional costs.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that Alternative 1 be approved and that the
county accept the renewal of Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Virginia
for the contract year beginning July 1, 1989.
SUBMITTED BY:
D. K. Cook
Director of Human Resources
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Richard W. Robers to approvCearrett x
Received ( ) Alternative #1 Johnson
Ref erred--- -_ McGraw
To Nickens
Robers x
cc: File
D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources
Assistant County Administrators
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Lee Linkus, Employees Advisory Committee
ACTION NO. A-61489-4
ITEM NO. Z —
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Approval of Consent Special Order
Dixie Cavern Landfill
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: 1
a� � C�T-off✓
BACKGROUND:
For approximately one year the County has been working with
the State Water Control Board ("SWCB") to eliminate the unpermitted
discharge to state waters from the Dixie Caverns Landfill . Since
November 1988 the County has been negotiating a Consent Special
Order ("CSO") with the SWCB and the Virginia Department of Waste
Management ("DWM"). An appropriate CSO has been devised and a
plan has been developed to eliminate unpermitted discharge from the
site.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
While the County has been proceeding to complete the removal
action under a joint agreement with the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency ("EPA") to clean up certain disposal areas
adjacent to the old Dixie Caverns landfill site, the County and the
SWCB have been working together to address the escape of leachate
from the site. To control this discharge the County has con-
structed a leachate holding pond as directed by SWCB. This pond
helps control the discharge induced by rainwater seepage in the
landfill area. Although this problem is limited to surface runoff
and impacts a small stream at the site, a long term solution is
necessary.
Under the CSO the County will develop a plan to stop the
production and discharge of leachate from the site. This plan
will be reviewed by SWCB and DWM for their approval. This plan
may also be subject to the jurisdiction of EPA.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: 0";1
The fiscal impact of developing a plan to satisfy the CSO is
$6000.00 for outside engineering and legal assistance, although the
bulk of the work will be handled by existing staff in the Engineer-
ing Department. Funding for this expense can be allocated from
l 1Z /
the Dixie Caverns Account. The costs to implement the approved
plan are unknown at this time, since the full extent of the work
required awaits regulatory approval. This work shall be brought
back to the Board for a future appropriation.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board authorize the County
Administrator to execute the Consent Special Order with the SWCB
and DWM to address the production and discharge of leachate from
the old Dixie Caverns landfill.
Respectfully submitted,
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
Action Vote
No Yes Abs
Approved (x) Motion by Lee Garrett/ Garrett x
Denied ( ) Steven A. McGraw Johnson x
Received ( ) McGraw x
Referred Nickens x
to Robers x
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
ACTION # A-61489-5
ITEM NUMBER D --5
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989
AGENDA ITEM:
Appropriation of Funds for Virginia Amateur
Sports, Inc.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
Virginia Amateur Sports, Inc., was formed in 1989 as a
non-profit corporation to bring amateur athletes of all ages from
across Virginia to the Valley to compete in the Virginia State
Games.
The State Games will be new to Virginia, but they are well
established in a national context. In 1988, State Games were
held in 31 states across the country. In 1989, nine additional
states will host the state games for the first time, bringing the
total number of states participating to 40.
Patterned after the Olympics, the State Games is a
multisport competition designated to promote amateur sports.
This competition is viewed by the Olympic Committee as the first
rung on the Olympic ladder.
The State Games of Virginia are proposed to begin in the
summer of 1990 with the full sanction of the Olympic Committee
and the Governor. They expect 3,000+ participants competing in
ten sports.
The anticipated annual budget for Virginia Amateur Sports,
Inc., is $500,000. Governor Baliles has included $175,000 in the
State budget for the State Games. An additional $87,500 is being
requested from the local governments in the Roanoke Valley. The
balance of the revenues will be generated through major sponsors,
entry fees, merchandise sales and concession sales.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Z-1.5
Virginia Amateur Sports, Inc., is requesting a per capita,
pro rata share of funding from the local Valley governments to
support their effort to bring an organized amateur sporting event
to the Roanoke Valley. The total local share requested is
$87,500 of which Roanoke County is being asked to contribute
$29,400. Attached for the Board's review is additional
information regarding this project. A detailed budget can be
provided by staff upon request.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS:
Alternative 1. Reappropriate $25,000 from the FY 1989-90
Board Contingency to fund Virginia Amateur Sports, Inc. This
would leave a balance in the Board Contingency account for next
fiscal year of $25,000.
Alternative 2. Reappropriate $25,000 from the FY 1989-90
Capital Fund previously to be used for an unnamed Economic
Development project. This would leave a balance in the economic
development project account for next fiscal year of $75,000.
Alternative 3. Deny the request for funding by the Virginia
Amateur Sports, Inc.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative one.
/(X.�.Fi, /e1i
Reta R. Busher
Director of Management
and Budget
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/ Steven No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) A. McGraw to approve Alter- Garrett x
Received ( ) native #1 Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
To
cc: File
Reta
Diane
Steve
John
Nickens Abstain
Robers x
Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Hyatt, Director, Finance
Carpenter, Director, Parks & Recreation
Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator
a
V6
VIRGINIA AMATEUR SPORTS, INC.
P.O. BOX 556 • VINTON, VIRGINIA 24179 • 703-343-0987
February 2, 1989
Mr. Elmer C. Hodge
Administrator for the County of Roanoke
3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W.
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Dear Mr. Hodge:
Virginia Amateur Sports has been formed to bring amateur
athletes from across Virginia to the Virginia State Games in our
Valley. We expect more than 3,000 amateur athletes to compete in
these Olympic sanctioned games, as they pursue their quest for a
place on the United States Olympic Team.
Virginia Amateur Sports is a statewide non-profit Virginia
corporation, with its principal leadership and office in the
Roanoke Valley.
The Governor's budget now before the Virginia legislature
includes funding to Virginia Amateur Sports of $175,000.00 for
the 1990 Virginia State Games in the Roanoke Valley.
Bringing 3,000 amateur athletes for competition in ten
major Olympic sports will require some additional funds.
On behalf of the Board of Directors of Virginia Amateur
Sports, I write to ask you to help bring this major sporting
event to the Valley by including funds for the Virginia State
Games in your next budget in the amount of DD
This request represents a per capita, pro rata share among
valley governments of $87,500.00. This small investment will, we
believe, return a handsome economic benefit to the Valley. We
will be happy to provide details of the economic impact we
anticipate.
I will be happy to meet with you or your advisors, as will
our secretary, H. Bern Ewert, and other members of the board.
With best regards, I am
✓ I R G I N
Sincerely yours,
VIRGINIA AMATEUR SPORTS -- -
Kenne King, r.
Board Chairman
IA STATE GAMES
VIRGINIA AMATEUR SPORTS, INC.
P.O. BOX 556 • VINTON, VIRGINIA 24179 • 703-343-0987
ID 5
VIRGINIA AMATEUR SPORTS INC.
Amateur athletes of all ages deserve the opportunity to
participate, develop and compete. Yet many great athletes
in our community, in Virginia and across our country have
few opportunities to compete and often their efforts go
unrecognized publicly. Today we hear more about the trouble
our youth can be involved in with drugs, alcohol, teenage
pregnancies, gang wars, academic failures and the like.
Virginia Amateur Sports, Inc., is a non-profit
organization chartered in 1989 to promote the development of
amateur athletes in our state. Virginia Amateur Sports wants
to see our young people have the opportunity to compete and
be honored for the many good things they do and can
accomplish.
Virginia Amateur Sports operates with four primary
goals:
1. to sponsor, develop, promote and stage the State
Games of Virginia with the objective of making the Virginia
State Games the best in the nation;
2. to assist in the development and promotion of
amateur sports and activities in the State of Virginia;
3. to attract other major amateur athletic events,
such as national sports championships, pre -Olympic
qualifying events, and major amateur exhibitions to
Virginia; and
4. to develop and promote anti-drug programs and
steriod education for athletes of all ages within the State
of Virginia.
THE STATE GAMES
Seven out of every ten Virginians watch, read or talk
sports every day and nearly 97% of our population
participates in an athletic event at least once a month. So
it comes as no surprise that the State Games will touch a --
V I R G I N I A
STATE GAMES
Z-5
major portion of the population of Virginia. There will
soon be a new tradition in Virginia which will unite people
from every region of our state. The State Games of Virginia
will become a reality in 1990 and, with the experience of
other states as a guide, will become within two years
Virginia's biggest and most visible amateur sporting event,
generating active participation by amateur athletes and
enthusiastic spectators alike.
The State Games of Virginia will begin in the summer of
1990 with the full sanction of the Olympic Committee and the
Governor of our fine state. Following a Torch -run -across -the -
state and an opening ceremonies extravaganza complete with a
march of 3,000+ athletes who will compete in fifteen sports.
All winners will receive gold, silver and bronze metals to
commemorate their find achievements. In addition to the
athletes and spectators, approximately 1,000 volunteers will
take part in making the States Games possible. Hopefully, -
the State Games in Virginia will be off to a running start.
We expect 3,000+ participants in 1990, 6,500 in 1991, 7,500
in 1992 and over 10,000 by 1993.
FINANCIAL BENEFITS
Competition to host major sporting events in the last
four years has become unbelievable. The potential for
financial reward is immense. According to Sport. Inc. there
was 47 billion dollars spent on sports in 1986 and that
figure is on the rise. As the money associates with all
kinds of sports increases, more regions of the country are
competing to bring those dollars to their communities.
The United States Olympic Festival is -one of the big
dollar events. In 1982, Indianapolis hosted the festival and
that one event turned the whole city around. Since 1982
Indianapolis has hosted more than 100 sports events,
The State Games will be new to our state, but they are
well established in a national
context. The tradition began
in 1978 with New York's Empire State Games. In 1988, State
Games were held in 31 states across the country. In 1989
nine additional states will host
the state games for the
first time, bringing the total number of states
participating in State Games to 40.
Patterned after the Olympics, Games is a
multisports
�
competition designated to
g promote amateur
sports. It provides aspiring athletes of
s
all ages and skill
levels the opportunity to experience the thrills of formal
competition. Viewed by the Olympic Committee as the first
rung on the Olympic ladder, State Games is an early training
f
ground for future United States Olympians.
The State Games of Virginia will begin in the summer of
1990 with the full sanction of the Olympic Committee and the
Governor of our fine state. Following a Torch -run -across -the -
state and an opening ceremonies extravaganza complete with a
march of 3,000+ athletes who will compete in fifteen sports.
All winners will receive gold, silver and bronze metals to
commemorate their find achievements. In addition to the
athletes and spectators, approximately 1,000 volunteers will
take part in making the States Games possible. Hopefully, -
the State Games in Virginia will be off to a running start.
We expect 3,000+ participants in 1990, 6,500 in 1991, 7,500
in 1992 and over 10,000 by 1993.
FINANCIAL BENEFITS
Competition to host major sporting events in the last
four years has become unbelievable. The potential for
financial reward is immense. According to Sport. Inc. there
was 47 billion dollars spent on sports in 1986 and that
figure is on the rise. As the money associates with all
kinds of sports increases, more regions of the country are
competing to bring those dollars to their communities.
The United States Olympic Festival is -one of the big
dollar events. In 1982, Indianapolis hosted the festival and
that one event turned the whole city around. Since 1982
Indianapolis has hosted more than 100 sports events,
D -S
including the 1988 Olympic Trials in five sports and has
become the home to the Athletic Congress, the Amateur
Athletic Union, the National Track and Field hall of Fame
and the United States Gymnastic Federation. In 1986 North
Carolina Amateur Sports stated the first North Carolina
State Games. The following year North Carolina hosted its
first United States olympic festival. The 187 Festival broke
attendance records in 26 of the 34 sports and turned a 1.5
Million dollar profit and an estimated 35 million dollar
impact on the area. North Carolina reaped the rewards by
hosting ten top amateur contests in 1988, including
U.S./Cuba Volleyball and the Canoeing and Kayaking National
Championships. Ken Smith, Executive Director of North
Carolina Amateur Sports had this to say, "The Festival gave
us the track record to go after other sports which has
helped turned North Carolina into a sports festival state."
Both North Carolina and Indianapolis have growing roles
in the state Games. The Indianapolis Sports Corporation has
25 full-time staffers, who devote 60^ of their time to the
White River State Games and had 21,000 participants in 1988.
MAJOR SPONSORS
Virginia Amateur Sports, Inc., is off to a great start.
Anticipated annual budget to provide the State Games and the
other goals set by the organization is approximately
$500,000.00 annually.
Governor Baliles has included Virginia Amateur Sports,
Inc., in his just -released 1989-90 budget, with financial
support in the sum of $175,000.00. An additional $87,000.00
is being sought from the governments of the Roanoke Valley.
The rest of the money will come from:
a. major sponsors;
b. gold, silver and bronze donors; and
C. from athlete participation fees.
Virginia Amateur Sports intends to draw upon initial
government and corporate support for the 1990 State Games.
As a statewide event, the State Games will be presented in
Roanoke Valley, Virginia and will offer major sponsors and
our local governments the opportunity to enhance our image
statewide through all planned public relations and
advertising.
The financial impact upon the Roanoke Valley for 1990
is shown on the following page:
For the Virginia State Games economic impact projections w,� %il ].
be using Lawenthol and Horwath projection figures because ri,oy
are the statistical data that the Roanoke valley is the mo -t
familiar with because of their involvement with the Civic Center
and Metro Tournament planning. Using 3200 athletes. as an
expected number, and a ratio of athletes to family visitors and
coaches to be 1:1 along with a sampling error of 600 for friends,
relatives and "pure spectators^ (who are not involved in the
games at all). Add an additional 1000 volunteer workers and the
total becomes approximately 8000 people who will either be
participating, working or attending the games. We will break out
the 8000 individuals as follows:
1. 3200 athletes
800 of which will be considered day athletes. (A day
athlete is one who lives within a 50 mile radius of
Roanoke.)
2. 3200 family visitors and coaches
800 being day visitors
3. '1000 volunteer workers
500 being day workers
4. 600 friends, relatives and pure spectators
500 being day spectators
2600 — Day People Involved
5400 — Overnight People Involved
VIRGINIA STATE GAMES ECONOMIC IMPACT
PROJECTION FOR THE 1990 STATE GAMES
Attendance for Average Number
Day Only Involvement x Spending/Day x of Days = Financial Impact
2600 $10 3.5 $91,000.00
Direct tax add on of 5% 4.500.00
Attendance for Average Number
Overnight Involvement x Spending/Day x of Days = Financial Impact
5400 $100 1 $540.000.00
Direct tax add on of 5% 27,000.00
INDIRECT SPENDING ADDITION
2600 $18.52 $ 48.152.00
5400 $55.56 $300.024.00
TOTAL $1.010.676.00
The Virginia State Games will recognize a $1.010,676.00 Economic
Impact for the Roanoke Valley by hosting the 1990 Virginia State
Games!
VIRGINIA AMATEUR SPORTS
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
February 1, 1989
Steven J. Danish, Ph.D.
808 W. Franklin St.
Richmond, VA 23284
Mailing:
P.O. Box 2018
Richmond, VA 23284-2018
PHONE: 804-367-8089
Douglas J.,Fonder
3439 Halevan Road, SW.
Roanoke, VA 24018
Mailing:
P.O. Box 556
Vinton, VA 24179
PHONE: 703-343-7822
H. Bern Ewert
101 S. Jefferson St.
6th Floor
Roanoke, VA 24011
PHONE: 703-342-4222
Kenneth C. Ring, Jr.
400 Professional Arts Building
30 Franklin Rd, SW.
Roanoke, VA 24011
Mailing:
P.O. Box -1784
Roanoke, VA 24008
PHONE: 703-985-0736
Facsimile: 984-0742
Dr. Elizabeth Lee, Principal
Patrick Henry High School (H)
703-774-1009
2102 Grandin Road, SW.
Roanoke, VA 24015
PHONE: 703-981-2255
Annette G. Mariano, CPA
.500 Professional Arts Building
30 Franklin Road, SW
Roanoke, VA 24011
PHONE: 703-342-8005
Harry C. Nickens
4179 Toddsbury Drive
Vinton, VA 24179
Mailing:
P.O. Box 14065
Roanoke, VA 24038
PHONE: 703-982-7315
Jerry Spruell, Exec. Dir.
Roanoke Chapter, American Red
Cross
352 Church Avenue, SW.
Roanoke, VA 24016
PHONE: 703-985-3535
James M. Turner
2405 Wycliffe Avenue, SW.
Roanoke, VA 24014
Mailing:
P.O. Box 1689
Salem, VA 24153
PHONE: 703-389-5471"==
� v
r �
C. RICHARD CRANWELL
RO. BOII 45
9
.. VIRGINIA 2,10
FOURTEENTH DISTRICT
�-5
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
HOUSE OF DELEGATES
RICHMOND
March 13, 1989
Doualas J. Fonder, Executive Director
Virginia Amateur Sports
Shenandoah Building, Suite 412
303 First Street, S. W.
Roanoke, Va 24011
Dear Doug:
COMMITTLJ
rINnNCL I! rin ir. •,
COUNfS 7E
COUNTIES,
MILITIA ANf) ryll Ir'L
This letter is to confirm that the 1989 Governor's
Budget was approved. Included in the Governor's Budget was the
$175,000 to Virginia Amateur Sports for establishment of the
Virginia State Games. These funds shall be matched by local or
private sources, either in cash or in kind, in amounts at least
equal to the appropriation and which are deemed to -be acceptable
to the Department of Conservation and Historic -Resources -.-
For your files I have enclosed copy of Section 76 of
Item 486 of the Governor's Budget. If you have any questions,
do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely
C. Richard Cranwell
cfw
Enclosure
F2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989
RESOLUTION 61489-6 APPROVING SPECIFIC CAPITAL
EXPENDITURES FOR AN FAR PART 150 NOISE STUDY
PROJECT BY THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT
COMMISSION, UPON CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS
WHEREAS, Section 17.(b) of the contract between the City of
Roanoke, Roanoke County, and the Roanoke Regional Airport
Commission provides that the Commission shall prepare and submit
for approval any proposed capital expenditure exceeding $100,000
to benefit five or more future accounting periods; and
WHEREAS, by report dated March 28, 1989, a copy of which is
on file in the Office of the City Clerk, the Roanoke Regional
Airport Commission has submitted a request that the County
approve capital expenditures by the Commission for an FAR Part
150 Noise Study Project in a total estimated amount of $180,000.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, that the County hereby approves the
capital expenditure by the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission of
approximately $180,000 in connection with the Roanoke Regional
Airport FAR Part 150 Noise Study Project, and the County
Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take
such actions as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes and
intent of this Resolution, on behalf of the County, in form
approved by the County Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Robers and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Al n, Deputy Clerk
cc: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Roanoke Regional Airport Commission
ACTION # A-61489-7 r-�r
ITEM NUMBER — /
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Request for Approval of Payment for Work Performed
by Olver Incorporated on Red Hill Site
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
As part of the landfill siting work performed by Olver
Incorporated, Roanoke County requested that the scope of work be
expanded to include a sixth potential landfill site. Olver
Incorporated proceeded with their investigation of site 44 in the
Red Hill section.
The total cost of this additional work is $15,794.55. In
accordance with Section 5 of the Assignment Agreement to Roanoke
County, the Landfill Board and each Political Subdivision must
approve change orders exceeding $10,000. The Landfill Board has
approved the change order. At this time, we are requesting the
Board of Supervisors' approval of Change Order Number 1 for this
additional work.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS:
(1) Approve Change Order Number 1 in the amount of $15,794.55
for the additional work to investigate Site 44. This amount will
be reimbursed to Roanoke County by the Landfill Board.
(2) Do not approve Change Order Number 1.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Alternate 1.
f
SUBMITTED BY:
4ohinnLRAubbard , P.E.
Assistant County Administrator
Community Services & Development
APPROVED:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
7
-------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved () Motion by: Harry C. N; kens/T,ee No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Garrett to approve A1terna ivoGarrett x
Received ( ) #1 Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
to: Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989
RESOLUTION 61489-8 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR
CONSULTANT SERVICES WITH O.D. PAGE, P.E. AND PAYMENT OF
PROPORTIONATE CONTRACT COST
WHEREAS, the current cable television franchise agreement
covering the County of Roanoke and the Town of Vinton will expire;
and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke Regional Cable Television Committee has
determined that the services of a cable television consultant would
be beneficial to the localities affected in evaluating the proposed
renewal of this franchise by Cox Cable of Roanoke Inc. and in the
negotiations for such renewals; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke Regional Cable Television Committee,
after compliance with the provisions of Title II of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, applicable to the procurement of
professional services, has selected the firm of O. D. Page, P.E.
for cable television consultant services in connection with this
proposed franchise renewal.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. The County Administrator is hereby authorized to enter
into and execute an agreement with O. D. Page, P.E. for the
provision by such firm of consultant services in connection with
the proposed cable television franchise renewal, as more par-
ticularly set forth in the April 27, 1989, letter of Howard E.
Musser, Chairman, Roanoke Regional Cable Television Committee.
2. The County shall pay its proportionate share of $2,947.00
of the total amount of the contract authorized by this resolution.
3. The form of the contract with this firm shall be approved
by the County Attorney's Office.
4. An emergency is deemed to exist and this resolution shall
be in full force and effect upon its passage.
On motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by Supervisor
Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garret
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Howard E. Musser, Chairman, Roanoke Regional Cable Television
Committee
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNN, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUN'T'Y ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989
ORDINANCE 61489-9 APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET FOR
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, upon notice duly published in the newspaper, a public hearing
was held on April 11, 1989, concerning the adoption of the annual budget for
Roanoke County for fiscal year 1989-90; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, approved
said budget on April 25, 1989, pursuant to the provisions of Section 13.02 of
the Roanoke County Charter and Chapter 4 of Title 15.1 of the 1950 Code of
Virginia, as amended; -and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this appropriation ordinance was held on
May 23, 1989, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on June 14,
1989, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County
Charter.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
as follows:
1. That the following appropriations are hereby made from the respective
funds for the period beginning July 1, 1989, and ending June 30, 1990, for the
functions and purposes indicated:
2. That the -'County Administrator may authorize the transfer of any
unencumbered balance or portion thereof from one classification of expenditure
to another within the same department or agency. That the County
0
EXPENDITURES:
GENERAL FUND
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
CO ADMINISTRATOR
ADMINISTRATION
INFORMATION i REFERRAL
HUMAN RESOURCES
ADMINISTRATION
EMPLOYER RELATIONS
COUNTY ATTORNEY
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ADMINISTRATION
MARKETING
TREASURER
COMMONNEALTH ATTORNEY
VICTIM/NITNESS
COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE
ADMINISTRATION
REAL ESTATE
PERSONAL PROPERTY
BUSINESS LICENSE
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
PUBLIC RECORDS
MICROFILM
POLICING AND INVESTIGATING
ADMINISTRATION
CIVIL DIVISION
UNIFORM DIVISION
CRIMINAL INVEST DIVISION
SERVICES DIVISION
TRANSPORTATION SAFETY COMMISSION
CARE i CONFINEMENT OF PRISONERS
CIRCUIT COURT
GENERAL DISTRICT COURT
MAGISTRATE
J i D RELATIONS COURT
PROBATION
ASST COUNTY ADMIN -MGT SERVICES
COUNTY ASSESSOR
ADMINISTRATION
REASSESSMENT
BOARD OF EQUILIZATION
FINANCIAL PLANNING
CENTRAL ACCOUNTING
PAYROLL
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
RISK MANAGEMENT
PROCUREMENT SERVICES
COUNTY OF ROANOIR, VIRGINIA
PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 1989-90 BUDGET
NAY 9, 1989
-------------------------------------------------------------
PERSONNBL OPERATING CAPITAL TRANSFERS TOTAL
-------------------------------------------------------------
$99,108 71,523
134,717
15,616
37,677
44,058
161,531
44,017
78,102
29,396
192,664
26,620
120,255
113,356
23,500
286,311
177,611
294,079
18,200
6,670
57,766
71,998
175,167
96,683
343,663
39,737
170,819
575,348
1,316,503
549,677
840,814
1,696,962
7,350
300
4,600
13,329
74,198
14,372
91,680
38,441
49,700
54,150
248,678
80,623
105,343
960
319,762
93,614
16,760
730
9,221
44,175
62,296 71325
193,226 60,974
310,630 34,935
10,765
192,878
91,471
53,449
14,990
60,000
78,102
44,534
70,034
1,060,284
178,083
39,996
500
1,025
4,200 (37,143)
5,680 34,625
5,600
3,132
180,099
10,934
9,633
1,680
1,915
$171,131
150,333
81,735
206,573
29,396
186,341
233,611
23,500
504,227
312,279
6,670
62,366
85,327
254,965
111,055
438,475
78,178
220,519
629,498
1,745,280
641,234
955,790
960
2,016,724
100,964
18,740
730
11,136
44,175
69,621
175
254,375
6,203
351,768
10,165
15,431 299,780
175
68,614
5,400
65,400
122,636
1,130,318
195
218,274
FIRE
ADMINISTRATION
FIRE SUPPRESSION
FIRE PREVENTION
TRAINING
TECHNICAL SERVICES
PLANNING AND RESEARCH
RESCUE SQUAD
OPERATIONS
ENS SERVICES
RKRRGENCY SERVICES
PLANNING AND OPERATIONS
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
ASST CO ADKIN-COKKUNITY SVCS
GENERAL SERVICES
SOLID WASTE
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
DRAFTING E RECORDS
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION
DRAINAGE
ROADWAY
STREET LIGHTING
BUILDING KAINTENANCE - -
PLANNING A ZONING
ADMINISTRATION
ZONING ORDINANCE
PLANNING COKKIMON
DEVELOPKENT REVIEW
PRRNITS
DEVELOPKENT REVIEW
CONSTRUCTION BUILDING SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
INSPECTIONS
ASST CO ADKIN-HUKAN SERVICES
GROUNDS NAINTENAMCE
GROUNDS MAINTENANCE
LEAF COLLECTION
STREET SIGNS
PARIS AND RECREATION
COMNUNITI EDUCATION
LEISURE ACTIVITIES
OUTDOOR ADVENTURE
SENIOR CITIZENS
SPECIAL EVENTS
THERAPEUTICS
ADULT ATHLETICS
IOUTH ATHLETICS
MINISTRATION
PUBLIC HEALTH
SOCIAL SERVICES MINISTRATION
PUBLIC ASSISTANCE
INSTITUTIONAL CARE
-------------------------------------------------------------
PERSONNEL OPERATING CAPITAL TRANSFERS TOTAL
-------------------------------------------------------------
71,436
27,725
13,500
112,661
836,537
282,538
55,600
168,786 1,343,461
95,004
8,300
3,300
106,604
31,950
39,605
8,200
79,755
58,956
149,086
1,770
209,812
36,476
2,455
15,000
38,931
198,466
23,695
101,173
181,752
826,145
214,565
95,777
110,971
46,256
35,630
245,401
233,075
8,900
15,995
83,134
47,983
40,168
172,261
88,504
620,987
92,947
95,360
33,163
80,601
48,900
79,653
59,733
140,976
208,590
1,601,907
169,078 45,570
9,075
7,300
10,620
18,500
(10,800)
24,318
2,800
663,008
90,596
16,757
11,460
(97,584)
10,264
500
(39,758)
9,364
15,000
(57,730)
43,744
110,000
4,700
98,441
524,743
46,060
39,528
1,900
2,700
2,085
1,400
7,000
23,413
9,171
208,599
26,150
4,200
1,000
1,000
376
3,100
3,400
17,880
4,000
10,000
89,952
412,599
226,823
954,030
36,000
20,000
33,550
14,437
4,040
214,648
207,541
30,995
10,620
108,873
208,870
1,579,749
145,198
66,783
77,605
200,000
40,330
98,441
816,204
274,503
8,900
18,695
85,219
49,383
47,168
215,674
97,675
863,136
26,150
4,200
93,947
96,360
33,539
83,701
52,300
97,533
63,733
150,976
312,979
412,599
1,832,770
954,030
36,000
RECREATION FEE CLASS FUND
COKKUNITY EDUCATION
-------------------------------------------------------------
PERSONNEL
OPERATING
CAPITAL
TRANSFERS
TOTAL
SOCIAL SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS
-------------------------------------------------------------
94,984
42,022
OUTDOOR ADVENTURE
94,984
CONTRIBUTIONS SVC ORGANIZATIONS
1,750
30,000
SENIOR CITIZENS
7,491
30,000
LIBRARY
29,239
SPECIAL EVENTS
5,376
50,635
3,000
MINISTRATION
108,612
650
4,300
700
109,262
RESEARCH AND CIRCULATION
661,283
265,485
1,000
53,660
926,768
GENERAL KAINTENANCE
975
62,900
975
ADMINISTRATION
62,900
JOINT BOTETOURT/R[E CNTY LIB
21,816
24,753
125
46,694
E%TENSION i CONTINUING EDUCATION
87,524
17,170
104,694
ELECTIONS
MINISTRATION
100,363
13,250
1,300
114,913
REGISTRATION
92,931
26,899
39,200 105,284
442,428
119,830
ELECTIONS
28,357
12,175
220,093
40,532
ANIKAL CONTROL
107,689
42,355
14,000
164,044
EKPLOYEE BENEFITS
594,298
594,298
CONSOLIDATION
200,000
200,000
KISCELLANEOUS
811,349
811,349
TRANS TO DEBT-GENBRAL
3,746,121
3,746,121
TRANS TO DEBT SHRVICE-SCHOOL
1,646,575
1,646,575
TRANS TO CAPITAL
901,443
901,443
TRANS TO SCHOOLS
28,637,950
28,637,950
TRANS TO GARAGE II
120,000
120,000
TRANS TO YOUTH HAVEN II
78,658
78,658
TRANS TO INTERNAL SERVICE
305,832
305,832
TRANS TO UTILITY CAPITAL
40,000
40,000
CONTINGENT BALANCE
50,000
50,000
SUB-TOTAL GENERAL FUND
-------------
$62,353,648
-------------
DEBT SERVICE FUND
6,607,879
6,607,879
CAPITAL FUND
1,051,443
1,051,443
YOUTH HAVEN II FUND
235,927
71,816
1,000
308,743
RECREATION FEE CLASS FUND
COKKUNITY EDUCATION
15,181
6,789
2,250
24,220
LEISURE ACTIVITIES
13,502
26,820
1,700
42,022
OUTDOOR ADVENTURE
4,300
23,705
1,750
29,755
SENIOR CITIZENS
7,491
19,748
2,000
29,239
SPECIAL EVENTS
5,376
50,635
3,000
59,011
THERAPEUTICS
4,300
4,300
700
9,300
ADULT ATHLETICS
39,820
12,840
1,000
53,660
YOUTH ATHLETICS
975
975
ADMINISTRATION
4,967
5,797
1,000
11,764
LNTBRNAL SERVICES FUND
KANAGEKENT INFORKATION SYSTEKS
MINISTRATION
100,363
13,250
1,300
114,913
OPERATIONS
157,597
140,347
39,200 105,284
442,428
DEVELOPKENT
211,543
7,850
700
220,093
GARAGE II FUND
SUB -TOTAL GENERAL COUNTY FUNDS
SCHOOL OPERATING FUND
SCHOOL BUS FUND
SCHOOL CAFETERIA FUND
SCHOOL FEDERAL PROGRAMS FUND
SCHOOL CAPITAL INPROVENBNTS FUND
SCHOOL VPSA LOAN FUND 1988 ISSUE
SCHOOL VPSA LOAN FUND 1989 ISSUE
SCHOOL TBITBOOK FUND
REGIONAL SPECIAL EDUCATION FUND
SUB -TOTAL SCHOOL FUNDS
TOTAL BIPBNDITURES ALL FUNDS
233,700
233,700
-------------
$80,386,569
-------------
$58,048,697
1,000,000
2,102,000
1,486,214
217,900
2,500,000
1,115,000
479,033
825,000
-------------
$68,373,844
-------------
$148,760,413
-------------------------------------------------------------
PERSONNBL
OPERATING
CAPITAL
TRANSFERS
TOTAL
COKKUNICATIONS
-------------------------------------------------------------
194,288
76,812
2,000
273,100
UTILITY FUND
UTILITY BILLING
COLLECTIONS
90,359
97,780
2,000
190,139
KETER READING
52,647
8,879
11,100
72,626
UTILITY
MINISTRATION
189,327
50,626
23,410
263,363
NATER OPERATIONS
368,532
1,447,420
15,000
1,830,952
NATER NAINTBNANCE
218,091
323,485
167,230
708,806
SEVER OPERATIONS
93,443
905,590
999,033
SEWER NAINTENANC6
244,629
139,519
18,377
402,525
SANITARY SEWER EVALUATION
272,412
140,750
154,845
568,007
NON-DEPARTKRNTAL-NATER
1,344,959
162,494
1,507,453
NON-DBPARTNBNTAL-SEVER
1,391,202
201,897
1,593,099
OFFSITE FACILITIES FUND -WATER
189,529
189,529
OFFSITE FACILITIES FUND -SEVER
195,144
195,144
GARAGE II FUND
SUB -TOTAL GENERAL COUNTY FUNDS
SCHOOL OPERATING FUND
SCHOOL BUS FUND
SCHOOL CAFETERIA FUND
SCHOOL FEDERAL PROGRAMS FUND
SCHOOL CAPITAL INPROVENBNTS FUND
SCHOOL VPSA LOAN FUND 1988 ISSUE
SCHOOL VPSA LOAN FUND 1989 ISSUE
SCHOOL TBITBOOK FUND
REGIONAL SPECIAL EDUCATION FUND
SUB -TOTAL SCHOOL FUNDS
TOTAL BIPBNDITURES ALL FUNDS
233,700
233,700
-------------
$80,386,569
-------------
$58,048,697
1,000,000
2,102,000
1,486,214
217,900
2,500,000
1,115,000
479,033
825,000
-------------
$68,373,844
-------------
$148,760,413
REVENUES:
GENERAL FUND
$62,353,648
DEBT FUND
6,607,879
CAPITAL FUND
1,051,443
YOUTH HAVEN II FUND
308,743
RECREATION FEE CLASS FUND
259,946
INTERNAL SERVICES FUND
1,050,534
UTILITY FUND
8,136,003
OFFSITE FACILITY FUND -NATER
189,529
OFFSITE FACILITY FUND -SEVER
195,144
GARAGE II FUND
233,700
SUB-TOTAL GENERAL COUNTY FUNDS
-------------
80,386,569
SCHOOL
OPERATING FUND
58,048,697
SCHOOL
BUS FUND
1,000,000
SCHOOL
CAFETERIA FUND
2,702,000
SCHOOL
FEDERAL PROGRANS FUND
1,486,214
SCHOOL
CAPITAL INPROVEKENTS FUND
217,900
SCHOOL
VPSA LOAN FUND 1988 ISSUE
2,500,000
SCHOOL
VPSA LOAN FUND 1989 ISSUE
1,115,000
SCHOOL
TEXTBOOK FUND
479,033
REGIONAL SPECIAL EDUCATION FUND
825,000
SUB-TOTAL SCHOOL FUNDS
-------------
68,373,844
-------------
TOTAL REVENUES ALL FUNDS =148,960,413
Administrator may transfer up to $10,000 from the unencumbered balance of the
appropriation of one department or agency to another department or agency,
including the contingency account encompassed in the Non -Departmental
appropriation.
3. That all funded outstanding encumbrances, both operating and capital,
at June 30, 1989, are reappropriated to the 1989-90 fiscal year to the same
department and account for which they are encumbered in the previous year.
4. That appropriations designated for capital projects will not laspe at
the end of the fiscal year but shall remain appropriated until the completion
of the project or until the Board of Supervisors, by appropriate action,
changes or eliminates the appropriation. Upon completion of a capital
project, staff is authorized to close out the project and transfer to the
funding source any remaining balances. This section applies to appropriations
for Capital Projects at June 30, 1989, and appropriations in the 1989-90
budget.
5. That all school fund appropriations remaining at the end of the
1988-89 fiscal year not lapse but shall be appropriated to The Local School
Capital Improvements Fund in fiscal year 1989-90. That a school fund deficit
at the end of fiscal year 1988-89 shall be satisfied by the reduction of the
School Operating Fund budget in fiscal year 1989-90.
On amended motion of Supervisor Nickens to approve ordinance with
No. 5 amended to read "Local School Capital Improvement Fund", and that staff
work with the School Board to ensure that the intent of the motion is carried
out, seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the following recorded
vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
2
A COPY TESTS:
v�•
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator
Don Myers, Assistant County Administrator
3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989
ORDINANCE 61489-10 AUTHORIZING THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM TO
SERVE A SPECIAL WATER SERVICE AREA
INCLUDING REAL ESTATE ALONG SHADWELL
DRIVE AND IN THE BELLVIEW GARDENS AND
BELLEVUE ESTATES SUBDIVISIONS, THE COSTS
THEREOF TO BE IMPOSED UPON CERTAIN
ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS BY AGREEMENT,
PROVIDING FUNDS THEREFOR, AND DIRECTING
THAT AN ABSTRACT OF THIS ORDINANCE BE
RECORDED SHOWING THE AMOUNT THAT WILL BE
ASSESSED AGAINST EACH SUCH LANDOWNER
WHEREAS, it is the judgment of the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia, that a new public water system
should be constructed as hereinafter provided, and that the cost
thereof be assessed by contract to certain landowners, as pro-
vided by law; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 112288-6 adopted by the Board on
November 22, 1988, pursuant to the authority found in Article 2,
Chapter 7 of Title 15.1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended,
authorizes the County to impose certain costs upon benefiting
property owners for certain local public works improvements; and
WHEREAS, certain abutting and benefiting property
owners have agreed to share in the equitable allocation and
apportionment of the construction costs for said improvements;
and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held
on May 23, 1989, and the second reading of the ordinance was held
on June 14, 1989.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the construction of a new public water system
to serve a special water service area in the County of Roanoke
which includes certain properties along Shadwell Drive and in the
Bellview Gardens and Bellevue Estates Subdivisions is hereby auth-
orized. This special water service area is designated on a cer-
tain map which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference.
2. That the estimated cost of this water project is
$368,000. In consideration of the execution and performance of
those contracts entered into between the abutting and benefiting
landowners and Roanoke County, the County shall administer, con-
struct, and finance this public water project. The property
owners agree to pay a proportionate share of the cost of the con-
struction of this project. Each abutting and benefiting property
owner, in accordance with the terms and provisions of said con-
tract, agrees to pay to the County the special water connection
fee of $4,000. This $4,000 fee includes the off-site water facil-
ity fee which will be credited against the cost of the project
and the basic connection fee of $500 for the service lateral,
meter box, meter setter, and the water meter.
The special water connection fee shall include the in-
dividual service line from the main water line located within a
public easement adjacent to the property to the edge of that ease-
ment, and the installation of a meter box, meter setter, and in-
dividual water meter. A private water service line from the
meter to a structure on the private property is the responsibil-
2
ity of the property owner, as well as any required plumbing and
cross -connection permits.
3. That each property owner has paid the sum of Fifty
Dollars ($50) of the basic connection fee upon the execution of
the contract with the County. The balance of the basic connec-
tion fee shall be paid on or before October 1, 1989. The land-
owner further agrees to pay the balance of the special water con-
nection fee ($3,500) either by October 1, 1989, or in seventy-two
(72) equal monthly installments, unless otherwise specifically
approved by the County. The interest rate of these installments
shall be eight percent (8%) of the unpaid balance.
4. That the property owner shall execute a promissory
note and a lien document or instrument which shall be recorded
among the records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
County, Virginia. This lien instrument or .document shall__sec_ure____
the repayment of the promissory note by the property owner to the
County and shall be a lien against the property and shall be sat-
isfied upon any conveyance of the property. The property owner
further agrees to pay the County any Clerk's fees or recordation
costs which may be required to record said lien instrument or
document in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court.
5. That any property owner within the special water
service area applying for public water service after October 1,
1989, and within six years (6) after the completion of construc-
tion of this project, shall pay a total water connection fee
which shall include: a special water connection fee of Four Thou-
sand Dollars ($4,000), the off-site water facility fee in effect
3
at the time of application, and the basic connection fee in
effect at the time of application. This total water connection
fee shall be due and payable prior to the connection to the pub-
lic water system and no installment payment financing by the
County shall be available under the provisions of this ordinance.
6. That in the event that the estimated cost of con-
struction is less than Three Hundred Sixty -Eight Thousand
($368,000) then the County shall proportionately reduce the
amount of the special water connection fee charged to each con-
tracting property owner in a proportionate manner based upon the
number of participating landowners. The County shall pay any
costs and expenses of construction which exceed this estimated
amount.
7. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe-
cute, ratify, and confirm on behalf of the County those contracts
offered by the property owners and to execute such other docu-
ments and take such further actions as may be required to accomp-
lish the purposes of this ordinance, all upon approval as to form
by the County Attorney.
8. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Robers and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
F11
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989
ORDINANCE 61489-11 AUTHORIZING THE
ACQUISITION OF REAL ESTATE FOR A PUMP
STATION AND WATER STORAGE TANK AND WATER
LINE EASEMENTS, OLD HOLLINS ROAD WATER
LINE PROJECT
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of
the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the
acquisition of real estate for a pump station and a water storage
tank and twelve ('12) easements for the Old Hollins Road Water
Line Project was held on April 11, 1989. A second reading on
this matter was held on June 14, 1989.
2. That these real estate and easement acquisitions
are for a water line project in the Hollins area of the County.
This project will provide necessary utility service to the citi-
zens of Roanoke County.
3. That the properties to be acquired are identified
as follows:
Tax Map
28.13-1-23
28.13-1-23.7
28.13-1-2-3
28.13-2-3.1
28.13-2-3.2
28.03.1-2
28.03-1-1
28.03-2-10
28.00-1-6
28.04-2.9
28.04-2-10
28.04-2-11
Property Owner
Myrtle Garman
Reginald Garman
Stephen Davidson
Stephen Davidson
Winter Properties
Ingersoll-Rand Co.
Kathryn Taylor
Paul Henson
Bradshaw -Trustee
William Sapp
Mark Vinson
Robert Runyon
Acquisition
Easement
Easement
Easement
Easement & Property
Easement
Easement
Easement
Easement
Easement & Property
Easement
Easement
Easement
4. That the consideration for the acquisition of
property for the pump station and water storage tank shall not
exceed the assessed value of the property; and that the
consideration for the acquisition of the easements shall not
exceed forty (40%) percent of the assessed value of the property.
That the sum of ten thousand ($10,000) dollars is hereby
appropriated for these real estate acquisitions.
5. That the County Administrator is authorized to
execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said
property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County
Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
�d
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
r,
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989
ORDINANCE 61489-12 AMENDING CHAPTER 7, BUILDING REGULATIONS,
OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY THE ADDITION OF ARTICLE V,
FEES, AND INCREASING SAME
WHEREAS, Section 2.01 of the Roanoke County Charter
grants to Roanoke County certain powers, including the powers
contained in Section 15.1-906 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as
amended, which authorizes establishing fees for permits in the
enforcement of any ordinance or regulation; and
WHEREAS, Section 15.1-510.1 of the Code of Virginia, as
amended, authorizes counties to charge such reasonable fees for
the issuance of permits and the performance of inspections; and
WHEREAS, Section 36-105 of the Code of Virginia, as
amended, authorizes local governments to enforce the provisions
of the Uniform Statewide Building Code, and to levy fees to
defray the cost of such enforcement and any appeals; and
WHEREAS, Roanoke County adopted and established a
building permit and fee schedule on September 1, 1974; and
WHEREAS, legal notice of a public hearing concerning
the adoption of an ordinance increasing these fees was provided
as required by law, and the first reading and public hearing on
this ordinance was held on May 23, 1989, and the second reading
and public hearing was held on June 14, 1989.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Chapter 7, Building Regulations of the Roanoke
County Code is hereby amended by the addition of Article V, Fees,
to provide as follows:
ARTICLE V. FEES
Division 1. Generally.
Section 7-71. Building or Demolitions.
There is hereby established the following schedule of fees
for Building and Demolitions permits:
Building or Demolition Valuations
$ .01 to $ 4,000
4,000 to 20,000
20,000 to 100,000
100,000 to 500,000
500,000 to 1,000,000
Over $1,000,000
Reinspection Fee $25.00
Fee
$25.00
6.00 per thousand valuation
120.00 plus $5 per thousand
520.00 plus $2 per thousand
1,320.00 plus $1 per thousand
1,820.00 plus $.50 per thousand
Certificate of Occupancy Fee - Residential - $10.00
Commercial - $25.00
Section 7-72. Electrical.
There is hereby established the following schedule of fees
for electrical permits:
No electrical permit shall be issued for less than $25.00.
Reinspection Fee $25.00
Wirinq to outlets (oven and concealed)
1
to
10
outlets
$ 6.00
11
to
20
outlets
8.00
21
to
30
outlets
10.00
31
to
50
outlets
12.00
51
to
100
outlets
15.00
All
over
100 outlets
- $15.00 plus each outlet over 100 .10
Fixtures
1
to
20
lights
$ 4.00
21
to
40
lights
6.00
41
to
75
lights
9.00
76
to
150
lights
12.00
151
to
350
lights
15.00
All
over
350 lights - $25.00 plus each light over 350
.10
E
11
Services
150 amp and under
151 amp to 200 amp
201 amp to 400 amp
401 amp and over
Temporary electric service (for each inspection)
Motors
Cost of 1/2 H.P. and under and fans and disposals
Cost of over 1/2 H.P. to and including 1 H.P.
Cost of over 1 H.P. to and including 3 H.P.
Cost of over 3 H.P. to and including 10 H.P.
All over 10 H.P.
Electric Heat
Baseboard, ceiling electric furnace and heat pump
$ 7.00
10.00
12.00
15.00
25.00
$ 2.00 each
5.00 each
7.00 each
10.00 each
15.00 each
$10.00
Special Appliances
Electric water heaters, ranges, space heaters, cook tops,
ovens, signs, radio apparatus, gas or oil furnaces, smoke
detectors, dryer, dishwasher, and other appliances requiring
special wiring $ 5.00 each
Section 7-73. Mechanical.
There is hereby established the following schedule of fees for
mechanical permits:
Amount of Contract or Estimated Cost Fee
$ .00
to
$ 500.00
$25.00
500.01
to
1,000.00
30.00
1,000.01
to
2,000.00
40.00
2,000.01
to
3,000.00
50.00
3,000.01
to
4,000.00
60.00
4,000.01
to
5,000.00
75.00
In excess of $5,000.00, the fee shall be $75.00 plus $4.00 for each
additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof.
Reinspection fee $25.00
Section 7-74. Plumbing
There is hereby established the following schedule of fees for
plumbing permits:
No plumbing permit shall be issued for less than $25.00.
3
Fixtures (each) $ 3.00
Floor drains 1.00
Water heater 3.00
Sewer 10.00
Trailers 25.00
Reinspection fee 25.00
2. That this ordinance shall be in effect from and
after July 1, 1989.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
e�V-
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections
Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer
R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney
Magistrate
Sheriff's Department
Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Ave., Rke 24016
Main Library
Roanoke County Code Book
Roanoke County J&D Court, Intake Counsellor
4
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989
ORDINANCE 61489-13 TO INCREASE THE
SALARIES OF THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY PURSUANT TO
SECTION 3.07 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY
CHARTER AND SECTION 14.1-46.01:1 OF THE
CODE OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, Section 3.07 of the Charter of the County of
Roanoke provides for the compensation of members of the board of
supervisors and the procedure for increasing their salaries; and
WHEREAS, Section 14.1-46.01:1 of the 1950 Code of Vir-
ginia, as amended, establishes the annual salaries of members of
boards of supervisors within certain population brackets; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, has heretofore established the annual salaries of Board
members to be $8,386 by Ordinance 61488-10 and further, has estab-
lished the additional annual compensation for the chairman for
the Board to be $1,800 and for the vice chairman of the Board to
be $1,200; and
WHEREAS, this section provides that the maximum annual
salaries therein provided may be adjusted in any year by an infla-
tion factor not to exceed five (5%) percent; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing on the establishment of these
salaries was held on May 23, 1989; and
WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held
on May 23, 1989; the second reading was held on June 14, 1989.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDAINED by the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the annual salaries
of members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virgin-
ia, are hereby increased by an inflation factor of five (5%) per-
cent pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.07 of the Roanoke
County Charter and Section 14.1-46.01:1 of the 1950 Code of Vir-
ginia, as amended. The new annual salaries shall be $8,805 for
members of the Board. In addition, the chairman of the Board
will receive an additional annual sum of $1,800 and the vice
chairman of the Board will receive an additional sum of $1,200.
This ordinance shall take effect on July 1, 1989.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens
NAYS: Supervisor Garrett
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Board of Supervisors
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources
2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON WEDNESDAY
JUNE 14, 1989
RESOLUTION 61489-14 CREATING THE ROANOKE COUNTY RESOURCE
AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors ("Board") of Roanoke County,
Virginia, ("County") has determined that it is in the best inter-
ests of the County to create the Roanoke County Resource Authority
pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Water and Sewer Authori-
ties Act, Chapter 28, Title 15.1, Code of Virginia of 1950, as
amended ("Act"). A public hearing has been held in accordance with
the requirements of Sections 15.1-1243 and 15.1-1250.01 of the Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. Creation of Authority. There is hereby created the
Roanoke County Resource Authority ("Authority").
2. Articles of Incorporation. The Articles of Incorporation
of the Roanoke County Resource Authority are as follows:
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
OF ROANOKE COUNTY RESOURCE AUTHORITY
ARTICLE I
The name of the Authority shall be Roanoke County Resource
Authority and the address of its principal office is 3738 Bramble-
ton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798.
ARTICLE II
The name of the incorporating political subdivision is County
of Roanoke, Virginia.
1
ARTICLE III
The names, addresses, and terms of office of the initial
members of the Board of the Roanoke County Resource Authority
("Authority") are as follows:
Name
Lee Garrett
Bob L. Johnson
Harry C. Nickens
Steven A. McGraw
Richard W. Robers
Address
The address of each
initial member is:
P. O. Box 29800
3738 Brambleton Avenue
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Term Expires
12/31/89
12/31/89
12/31/89
12/31/91
12/31/91
The terms of office of each initial members shall begin on the date
of issuance of a certificate of incorporation or charter for the
Authority by the State Corporation Commission. The successor of
each member shall be appointed for a term of four years by the
Board of Supervisors ("Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia,
except that any person appointed to fill a vacancy shall serve only
for the unexpired term.
ARTICLE IV
The purposes for which the Authority is created are to
exercise all the powers granted to the Authority under the Virginia
Water and Sewer Authorities Act, Chapter 28, Title 15.1, Code of
Virginia of 1950, as amended ("Act"). The inclusion of preliminary
estimates of capital costs, project proposals and rates for
services in the Articles of Incorporation is impracticable.
ARTICLE V
The Authority shall serve the County of Roanoke, and, to the
extent permitted by the Act and by the terms of such contracts as
the Authority may approve, the Cities of Roanoke and Salem, the
r.
Town of Vinton and such other public or private entities as the
Authority may determine upon the terms and conditions established
pursuant to such contracts.
3. Sanitary Landfill Operation. The Board hereby finds that
(i) privately -owned sanitary landfill services are not available
in a reasonable and cost-efficient manner and (ii) operation by the
Roanoke County Resource Authority of a sanitary landfill and any
related facilities or the contract for such operation in spite of
any potential anti-competitive effect, is important in order to
provide for the development and/or operation of a regional system
of garbage and refuse collection and disposal for the County of
Roanoke, the Cities of Salem and Roanoke, and the Town of Vinton
and such other governmental units or private entities as the
Authority may determine.
4. Effective Immediately. This resolution shall take effect
immediately upon its adoption.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
3
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
Roanoke County Resource Authority File
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989
RESOLUTION NO. 61489-15 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH
ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L -
CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain section of the agenda of the
Board of Supervisors for June 14, 1989, designated as Item L -
Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to
each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1
through 8, inclusive, as follows:
1. Approval of Minutes - November 9, 1988
2. Resolution of Support for Edinburgh Square
Foundation's request for Section 202 Direct Loan
Program funds to construct housing for low income
elderly persons.
3. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the
Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission.
4. Authorization to increase mileage reimbursement
for use of personal vehicles while conducting
county business.
5. Approval of salary increase for the County
Administrator and County Attorney
6. Approval of Fireworks Permit for Hills Department
Store.
7. Approval of Raffle Permit for Vinton Moose Lodge
8. Authorization to execute indemnity agreement -
Henry Acres Subdivision
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens with Items 6,and 7
removed for discussion, seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and upon
the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
Items 6 and 7 moved by Supervisor Johnson, seconded by
Supervisor Garrett and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
CC: File
Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989
RESOLUTION 61489-15.a SUPPORTING EDINBURGH
SQUARE'S APPLICATION FOR FUNDS FROM THE
DEPARTMENT OF LOW HOUSING AND URBAN
DEVELOPMENT TO CONSTRUCT HOUSING FOR LOW
INCOME ELDERLY
WHEREAS, there exists in the Roanoke Valley a need for
additional housing for the low income elderly; and
WHEREAS, Edinburgh Square Foundation has helped to meet that
need since October, 1986, providing a facility that has been
fully occupied since that time, and presently has a waiting list
of 92 persons; and
WHEREAS, Edinburgh Square Foundation and its sponsors, the
League of Older Americans and the Odd Fellows Mountain Dale Lodge
#49, desire to apply for funds through the Department of Housing
and Urban Development under Section 202 Direct Loan Program for
Housing for the Elderly to construct an addition to their present
facility; and
WHEREAS, this proposed addition, Edinburgh Greens, would
provide 27 regular one -bedroom apartments, 3 handicapped
one -bedroom apartments, 9 regular studio apartments and 1
handicapped studio apartment to meet the growing need for low
income elderly housing.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, strongly endorses the proposed addition
to Edinburgh Square; and
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, supports their application for funds from the
Department of Housing and Urban Development to construct this
facility.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Edinburgh Square Foundation
Department of Housing and Urban Development
ACTION NO. A -61489-15.b
ITEM NUMBERZ- 3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989
AGENDA ITEM• Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Parks
and Recreation Advisory Commission
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The following nominations were made at the May 23, 1989 meeting
and must now be confirmed.
Parks and Recrea ion Advisory Commission
Supervisor Robers has nominated Vince Joyce, Cave Spring
Magisterial District to another three-year term which will expire
June 30, 1992.
Supervisor Nickens has nominated Thomas Robertson, Vinton
Magisterial District to another three-year term which will expire
on June 30, 1992.
SUBMITTED BY:
xx-'O-� -Al - LC e
Mary H. Allen
Deputy Clerk
APPROVED BY:
4�� 6a
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
----------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/
Denied Yes No Abs
( ) Bob L. Johnson Garrett mac_
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred McGraw _
To: Nickens x
Robers -x
cc: File
Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission File
ACTION NUMBER A -61489-15.c
ITEM NUMBER 4—N
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
COMMENTS!
June 14, 1989
Approval of Salary Increase for County
Administrator and County Attorney
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Board of Supervisors met recently in Executive Session
to discuss salary increases for the County Administrator and
County Attorney. At that time, the Board approved an approximate
5% salary increase for Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator,
increasing his salary to $82,500. The Board also approved a 9.6%
salary increase for Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney, increasing
his salary to $68,500.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is necessary for the Board of Supervisors to approve the
salary increase for Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator,
increasing his salary to $82,500; and to approve the salary
increase for Paul M. Mahoney, increasing his salary to $68,500
for Fiscal Year 1989-90 in open session.
APPROVED BY:
Lee Garrett
Cha rman
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Bob L. Johnson Garrett x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
To Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Elmer Hodge, County Administrator
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989
RESOLUTION 61489-15.d AMENDING RESOLUTION 82388-6
ALLOWING MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT FOR MILEAGE IN THE
USE OF A PERSONAL VEHICLE FOR COUNTY BUSINESS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
as follows:
1. That Resolution 82388-6 adopted August 26, 1988, allowing mileage
reimbursement for the use of personal vehicles while conducting County
business be, and hereby is, amended to provide a reimbursement of 20 per mile
for the first 15,000 miles and llG per mile for all miles over the first
15,000 miles; and
2. That this rate shall be in full force and effect for mileage
expenses incurred from and after June 14, 1989.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Johnson and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Reta Busher, Director, Mangement & Budget
Assistant County Administrators
Department Heads
Constitutional Officers
ACTION NO. A -61489-15.e
ITEM NO. L _$
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Indemnity Agreement
Henry Acres Subdivision
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
40
BACKGROUND:
Walter Lewis Henry and Virginia B. Henry desire to subdivide
5.85 acres on State Route 923 into Henry Acres subdivision. The
subdivision plat includes the dedication of a road to be con-
structed to state standards and to be made a part of the secondary
road system. Staff has identified a potential legal problem
concerning an unreleased private easement of ingress and egress
serving an adjoining parcel.
The Henrys represent to the County that this private easement
is extinguished as a matter of law, since the purpose for said
easement ceases upon the establishment, dedication and acceptance
of the road to the public. Since a question exists as to the
legal effect of such action, The Henrys are submitting an indemnity
agreement to the County in the amount of $10,000 to indemnify and
hold harmless the County for any expense, loss or damage incurred
by it in connection with any claim concerning this issue, as a
result of the approval of the subdivision.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Indemnity Agreement is attached hereto. Approval of this
indemnity agreement is appropriate on the Consent Agenda. A
$10,000 cash escrow will be deposited with the Treasurer upon the
execution of this agreement.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS:
If the Board authorizes the execution of this indemnity
agreement, then the subdivision will proceed and the County shall
be indemnified up to $10,000. Staff calculates this sum to be
sufficient to resolve any future legal proceedings.
If the Board refuses to authorize the execution of this
agreement, then the Henrys may not be able to subdivide this
property as planned, and they must explore other alternatives.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board authorize the County
Administrator to execute the Indemnity Agreement on behalf of the
County, upon a form approved by the County Attorney.
Respectfully submitted,
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
Action Vote
ApprovedNo Yes Abs
(x) Motion by Harry C. NickPns/ Garrett x
Denied ( ) _Bob r.. Johnson Johnson x
Received ( ) McGraw x
Referred Nickens x
to Robers x
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections
WIA
INDEMNITY AGREEMENT
This Indemnity Agreement is made this 23rd day of May,
1989 between Walter Lewis Henry and Virginia B. Henry, husband
and wife, hereafter "the Henrys", as Indemnitors and the Board
of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, hereafter
"the Board", as Indemnitee.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
1. The Henrys are the owners of a parcel of land on
Virginia Secondary Route No. 923 (Corntassel Lane) in Roanoke
County, Virginia, containing 5.85 acres, more or less, to be
subdivided into Henry Acres Subdivision as shown by a plat of
survey prepared by Fred O. Shanks, III, P.C., dated December --
28, 1988. --
2. The subdivision plat includes a road identified as
Henry Farms Road to be constructed by,the Henrys to Virginia
secondary road standards, dedicated to public use and made a
part of the secondary road system of the Commonwealth of
Virginia.
3. Encompassed within Henry Farms Road as shown on the
subdivision plat is a private easement of ingress and egress
to and from Virginia Secondary Route No. 923 appurtenant to a
parcel of land containing 1.091 acres situate on the northerly
side of Henry Farms Road and the westerly side of Route No.
923 and identified in the records of Roanoke County, Virginia,
L- I
as Tax Parcel No. 85.04.-2-17. As of the date of this
Indemnity Agreement this parcel is owned by Clark Owen, Jr.
and Emilie M. Owen.
4. The private road easement appurtenant to the Owens'
property has not been released of record.
5. Upon approval of a subdivsion plat providing for the
dedication of a road to the public, the Board must provide to
the Virginia Department of Transportation the unencumbered and
unobstructed use of all public road rights-of-way shown on the
plat.
6. The Henrys represent to the Board that the private
easement of ingress and egress is extinguished as a matter of
law, since the purpose for said easement ceases upon the
establishment, dedication and acceptance of a road to the
public. In reliance upon this representation the Board
desires to approve the subdivision plat of Henry Acres without
the private easement of ingress and egress in a portion of
Henry Farms Road appurtenant to tax parcel no. 85.04-2-17
having been released, provided the Henrys indemnify and hold
harmless the Board for any loss or expense incurred by it in
connection with any claim made or legal proceeding brought by
the owners of Tax Parcel No. 85.04-2-17 that would interfere
with or obstruct the use by the public of Henry Farms Road.
TERMS OF AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the premises and
�-g
intending to be legally bound, the parties agree as follows:
7. The Board will cause the subdivision plat of Henry
Acres Subdivision to be approved, subject to the outstanding
private easement of ingress and egress in a portion of Henry
Farms Road as shown on said plat which is appurtenant to Tax
Parcel No. 85.04-2-17, being extinguished as a matter of law,
the purpose for the easement having ceased.
8. The Henrys, jointly and severally, will indemnify
and hold harmless the Board for any expenses, loss or damages
incurred by it in connection with any claim brought by the
owners of Tax Parcel No. 85.04-2-17, including any injunctive
proceeding, which is adverse to the interests of Roanoke
County or the Virginia Department of Transportation in Henry
Farms Road or which interferes with or obstructs the public ---
use of Henry Farms Road.
9. The Henry's liability under this agreement shall not
exceed $10,000.00, an amount agreed by the parties to be the
reasonable cost of defending any action brought or claim made
against the county arising out of the subject matter of this
agreement and/or acquiring any outstanding private easement of
access either by negotiated purchase or by the right of
eminent domain.
10. This indemnity agreement is secured by a certified
check, cash escrow, bond or letter of credit in the amount of
$10,000.00 to be delivered to the Board contemporaneously with
L- 9
the execution of this agreement and approval of the Henry
Acres Subdivision plat.
11. In the event a claim is made or legal proceeding
brought against the Board arising out of the private road
easement hereinabove described, the Board shall immediately
notify the Henrys and provide them with a reasonable
opportunity to defend the claim or proceeding or take such
other action as may be appropriate. In an emergency, the
Board shall cause such action to be taken as may be reasonably
necessary to provide for the uninterrupted use of the road by
the public. The Board will cooperate with the Henrys in all
respects as may be reasonably necessary under the
circumstances, including the purchase of any outstanding
private easement either by negotiation or through the right of
eminent domain. Any attorneys to be retained by the Board for
these purposes shall be subject to the prior approval of the
Henrys which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.
12. This Indemnity Agreement shall terminate five years
after the acceptance of the aforesaid Henry Farms Road into
the secondary road system of the Commonwealth of Virginia or
the termination of the private easement hereinabove described,
whichever shall first occur.
13. If the Department of Transportation refuses to
accept the dedication of the proposed public road into the
State Secondary Highway System as a result of this private
easement of ingress and egress, then the Henrys shall secure a
release of these private easement rights. The Board will
cooperate with the Henrys and assist them in securing such a
release in any reasonable manner, including exercise of the
right of eminent domain if necessary. Until the Henrys secure
such a release, the Henrys agree not to request any partial or
final release of any bond, escrow, letter of credit, or other
performance guarantee for the ocnstruction of any facilities
required for this subdivision. Until acceptance of this road
by the Department, the Henrys shall be responsible for all
maintenance and repairs, including snow removal.
WITNESS the following signatures and seals:
- -_-- —
(Seal)- --
Walter Lewis Henry
(Seal)
Virginia B. Henry
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR THE
COUNTY OF ROANOKE
By
(Seal)
A
ACTION N0. -61489-16
ITEM NUMBER L
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:. June 14, 1989
AGENDA ITEM• Approval of a Fireworks Permit for Hills Department
Store
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS.•
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION•
Hills Department Store has requested a permit for a fireworks
display to be held on July 4, 1989. Fireworks Unlimited of North
Carolina will conduct the display and they will agree to the
following safety precautions. These precautions were discussed
with and approved by Sheriff Kavanaugh on June 7, 1989.
Pursuant to Sheriff Michael Kavanaugh's
recommendation, Hills is required to employ ten off-
duty officers, starting one hour beforethefireworks begin and to extend one hour beyond the
time that the fireworks end. Six of these officers
would be assigned to handle additional traffic on
Route 419 and Route 221, and four would be used on
the parking lot at Hills department Store.
Fire Marshal Kenneth Sharp has reviewed the plans for the
fireworks display and he recommends approval of the permit.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the fireworks display with the
precautions outlined above.
SUBMITTED BY:
I.
Mary H. Allen
Deputy Clerk
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County --Administrator
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (X) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Lee Yes No Abs
Denied ( ) Garrett Garrett x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
To• Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Fireworks Permit File
Sheriff Kavanaugh
Chief Fuqua
L -(o
FIREWORKS DISPLAY PERMIT APPLICATION
Pursuant to the provision of Section 11-2 of the
Roanoke County Code the following organization hereby applies to
the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County for a display of
fireworks within Roanoke County.
1. Name of Organization:
2. Address: if 15%36 -. S 1J.
o
3. Date of Fireworks Display: 7-- Z/ —S�7 /c
4. Location of Fireworks Display: Z C1
5. Name and address of qualified expert who will conduct such
display and basis for his qualification as an expert:
Frir.L al& tiMiT,-1 T -W,2,
/r'/VLL'��L'� c42 7: 7<� X
12, :N.���
6. Attach copy of Certificate of Insurance.
7. Attach a safety plan outlining precautions that will be
implemented for the duration of the fireworks display:
The undersigned hereby certifies that the provisions
of Section 11-2 of the Roanoke County Code have been read and
will be complied with by said organization. Any fireworks that
remain unfired after the display shall be immediately disposed of
in a safe manner.
Name
Title
"""4 =u ar "L.IH" 1 1 1114.)Uh"i k r_INL;.
10.451 Gulf Boulevard Treasure Island, horida 33706
Toll Free 1-800-237-3355 National L /
1-800-282-6776 Florida
Certificate number: 15
CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE
FIREWORKS DISPLAY
NAME & ADDRESS OF INSURED:
Fireworks Unlimited, Inc.
Rt, 1, Box 257A
Ya nceyv i l le, NC 27379
ERIMARY_COVERAGE
'COMPANY**
CQsue
: POLICY NUMBER --------------
S QLQ2�g35_______
LIABILITY LIMIT,
Bod I ly Injury and
Property Damage:
Class B Products _________
.POLICY PERIOD: ---------
From: -/01/89
To; J/01/90
ADDITIONAL INSUREDS
Hills Stores Company, All Landlords,
Property Owners and Municipalities
EXCESS -COVERAGE
- __--- $_r-____-_--'#
Excess of " Excess of_"�
------------ --- ___ -------------
----------------- --- ------------------
0/00/00
0/00/00
O/00/00
O/00/00
In the event of any material change in, or cancel lat i onEofvsa idEPo L i�cy(ies),
the company will endeavor to give written notice to the party whom this cer-
tificate is issued, but failure to give such notice shall impose no Liability
or obligation upon the company.
NAME & ADDRESS OF CERTIFICATE HOLDER: DATE OF DISPLAY: July 4, 1989 @ 10:15p
Hills Department Stores RAIN DATES ul ..5.,_1.989 @r10:15pm
15 Dan Road DISPLAY AMOIONT}:
LOCATION OF DISPLAY: 3901 Brambleton Avenue - #
Canton, Massachusetts 02021 -Roanoke, VA 24018 --
It Is a Condition of the poLlcy that all dispLayS be reported to the company a';
Least 24 hours in advance of the display date.
This certificate neither affirmatively nor negatively amends extends or alters
the coverage afforded by the poLicy(ies) described hereon. NbTE:: In the event
that rain or Inclement weather prohibits this display • rgyol-age
w ill app Ly
on a subse-luent date on which the display is held, wilhln the terms of the
Policy contract. Cleanup and policing of the display are the responsibility
of the sponsors.
The following are additional insureds: any fair or exposition, association,
sponsoring organization or committee, the owner or Lessee of any premises used
by the Named Insured,or any pub t is authority granting a permit to the Named
Insured. but only as respects accident=. ar i si na aut of the nag l i<aence of the
Named Insured or the Named Insured's emp Loyees acting In the course and scope
of their employment. Also, as additional Named Insured, any Independent Con-
tractor who fires the display o n beha if of the Named Insured, This insurance
does not apply to any failure to police or cleanup the d i sp lay, or liability
arising there from.
This certificate Is not valid unless an original signature appears below.
(Copies Not Valid.)
Coverage under the policy Is conditioned upon full compliance by all insureds
�wlth all applicable National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) codes and
standards in effect at the time of display.
X:if1' -of-Certificate tssi!ancr� AuthorizOm;i natuIe�� _�
0
ACTION NO. A-F14R9-17
ITEM NUMBER L_ %
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of a Raffle Permit from the
Vinton Moose Lodge
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Vinton Moose Lodge has requested a Raffle Permit to hold a
raffle on November 12, 1989. This application has been reviewed
by the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be
approved.
The organization has paid the $25.00 fee.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit be
approved.
SUBMITTED BY:
Mary H. Allen
Deputy Clerk
APPROVED BY:
&ele�
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Beb L. dehnsen�Lee-- Yes No Abs
Denied ( ) (-,arrPff Garrett x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
To: Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Bingo/Raffle Permit File
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO
Applicatipn is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit.
This application is made subject to all County and State laws,
ordinances, rules, and regulations now in force, or that may be
enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the under-
signed applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under
which this permit is issued.
All applicants should exercise extreme care to ensure the accura-
cy of their responses to the following questions. Bingo games
and raffles are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. seg.
of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section
4-86 et. seq. of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize
the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investiga-
tion prior to granting a bingo or raffle permit. The Board has
sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the
permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any
organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and
state law.
Any person .violating county or state regulations concerning these
permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any person who
uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any
purpose other than the lawful religious, charitable, community,
or educational purposes for which the organization is specifi-
cally organized, except for reasonable operating expenses, shall
be guilty of a Class 6 felony.
THIS APPLICATION IS, FOR: (check one)
RAFFLE PERMIT BINGO GAMES
Name of Organization
Street Address_ -dLjl�-.W--.,Is17 lava Z)41�—
Mailing Address t���Q Lf
City, State, Zip Code '-r).,v /j 1)q/ 7
Purpose and Type of organization 12�k-Ala. G,✓e �ia�✓S��r✓�
When was the organization founded? / 9 LD
1
L-%
Roanoke County meeting place? c j rS /T verya %(C - ��, ►/7��✓ -fid oSG
Has organization been in existence in Roanoke County for two con-
tinuous years? YES NO
Is the organization non-profit? YES NO
Indicate Federal Identif ication Number # `j If - c7,617 �48,71
Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption letter.
Officers of the Organization:
President: ���a,,/ av�%j� Vice -President R,0 jep f
Address: )Yv L) A"e /? c: ,)! 6 7 6 Address:
Rd �
� _� Treasurer:
Address: Address: ROL)/e % Q -X
Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle,eso opera-
tions:
Name
Home Address
Phone ,7e) n; L�Gl S -Bus . Phone
A COMPLETE LIST OF THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF CURRENT MEMBER-
SHIP MUST BE FURNISHED WITH THIS APPLICATION. QV /Vale 4 i-ld 9, -y� P"""'�
Specific location wtere Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted.
V1.411" -M�,cSL LCL/y G � � � 7 41,1195h,vj til 49e, v„���� X14. a V 171
RAFFLES: Date of Drawing �/�y, la t�l'0"Time of Drawing /,'vv 10&7
BINGO: Days of Week & Hours of Activity:
aay
Mon
ay
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturdal”,
From
'To
From ,
To
F.r-oin
To
From
To
rom To
Fr To
From To
2
L-%
State specifically how the proceeds from the Bingo/Raffle will be
used. List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds.
Use estimates amounts if necessary.
'0w4J-js R�SQi� IS,, 741�
p~
UCSG r7C�Qv 7 ..�y1I'i / I�Jr% J%C<J`l1✓ � Z�r
/Duiars+S //J� ,77 v,fy
3
L-7
: Complete the following:
Legal"o�ner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted:
Name:
Address:
County
to zip
Is the bui ing owned b 501-C non-profit organization?
Seatin capacity for each to tion:
Parking spaces for each location:
ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1 - 19
1. Gross receipts from all sources related to the operation of
Bingo games or Instant Bingo by calendar quarter for prior calen-
dar year period.
BINGO INSTANT BINGO
1st Quarte
2nd Quarter
3rd Quarter
1st Quarter
2nd Quarter
3rd Quarter
4th Quarter , / 4th Quarter
Total / \ Total
2. _,Does your organization understand that it is a violation of
law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, associa-
tion, organization, partnership, or corporation of any classifica-
tion whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or con-
ducting Bingo Games or Raffles? a
3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain and
file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to
Bingo games and Raffles, and that such records are subject to
audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? G CS
4. Does your organization understand that the Commissioner of
the Revenue or his designee has the right to go upon the premises
on which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle,
to perform unannounced audits, and to secure for audit all re-
cords required to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles?
U Com_
J
4
L-7
5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report
must be filed with the Commissioner of the Revenue on or before
the first day of November of each calendar year for which a per-
mit has been issued?� G S
6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts ex-
ceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an addi-
tional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later
than sixty days following the last day of such quarter? G
7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file
financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of
the permit, and no such organization shall conduct any Bingo game
or raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed and a
new permit is obtained? �S
8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report
must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the
Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle
have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, commu-
nity, or educational purposes for which the organization is spe-
cifically chartered or organized, and that the operation of Bingo
games or raffles have been in accordance with the provisions of
Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia? ��
9. Does your organization understand that a one percent audit
fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke
upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before
the first of November? y �S
10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid
only in the County of Roanoke and only at such locations, and for
such dates, as are designated in the permit application? C
11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a
bona fide member of any such organization who shall have been a
member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to
such participation, shall. participate in the management, opera-
tion, or conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person
shall receive any remuneration for participating in management,
operation, or conduct -of any such game or raffle?
�s
12. Has your organization attached a check for the annual permit
fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke,
Virginia? q t'-�_
13. Does your organization understand that any organization found
in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or §18.2-
340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject
to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent,
member or employee of such organization who violates the above to
having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent,
member or employee of such organization who violates the above
referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? y C'S
5
L-7
14. Has your organization attached a complete list of its member-
ship to this application form? s
15. Has your organization attached a copy of its bylaws to this
application form? u eS
16. Has the organization been declared exempt from property taxa-
tion under the Virginia Constitution or statutes?
If yes, state whether exemption is for real, perso cTlpro ert ,
or both and identify exempt property. Ca
17. State the specific type and
uy
ur ose of the organization.
f , 'v
01
18. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia? c,141
If yes, name and address of Registered Agent:
Lo�jyl d 7t /1i c cSe-'
19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department
of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Charitable
Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code? "/a
(If so, attach copy of registration.)
Has the organization been granted an exemption from registration
by the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs?
^ZD _ (If so, attach copy of exemption.)
ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED,
VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION.
Article Description Fair Market Value
A Q
."
L-7
ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE
NOTARIZATION
RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION.
20. Does your organization understand that/calenda
ames shall
not be conducted more frequently than two ays in any
cale ar week?21. Doe your organization understand that ed to keep
complete cords of the bingo game. These reon §18.2-
340.6 of t eCode of Virginia and §4.98 oounty Code
must include the following:
a. A record d the date, quantity, an card value of instant
bingo suppli s purchased, as well as he name and address of
the supplie of such instant bingo supplies, and written
invoice or rece'pt is also required for each purchase of in-
stant bingo supp ies? /
b. A record in writi g of the dates on which Bingo is played,
the number of peop a in attendance on each date, and the
amount of receipts and prizes on each day?
(These records must be retained for three years.)
C. A record of the name an&/address of each individual to whom a
door prize, regular or/special Bingo game prize or jackpot
from the playing of Bingo Xs awarded?
d. A complete and itep/ized rebord of all receipts and disburse-
ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and
annual reports required to b filed, and that these records
must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit?
22. Does your or 9anization understand, that instant Bingo may only
be conducted at
ch time as regular ngo game is in progress,
and only at s A locations and at suc times as are specified in
this applicat' n?
23. Does y ur organization understand th t the gross receipts in
the cours of a reporting year from the pla ing of instant Bingo
may not xceed 33 1/3% of the gross receipt`s of an organization's
Bingo operation? \
24. 46es your organization understand it may not sell an instant
Bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age?
i
25`. Does your organization understand that an rganization whose
gross receipts from all bingo operations that e ceed or are ex-
pected to exceed $75,000 in any calendar year Shall have been
granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section 501 C of the United
States Internal Revenue Service? \
(Certificate must be attached.)
h
26 Iloes your organization understand that a tificate of Occu-
pancy st be obtained or be on file which horizes this use at
the prop ed location?
27. Does yo r organization underst d that awards or prize money
or merchandi valued in excess of the following amounts are
illegal?
a. No door prize S�all ex
,a6ed twenty-five dollars.
b. No regular Bingo r special Bingo game shall exceed One Hund-
red dollars.
c. No jackpot of any nat a whatsoever shall exceed One Thousand
Dollars, or shall the t al amount of jackpot prizes awarded
in any ne calendar day ex ed One Thousand Dollars.
NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL
APPLICANTS
I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set
forth in §18.2 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above
statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and
beliefs. All questions have been answered.
Signed by:
Name
Title
Subscribed and sworn before me, this
My commission expires:
19
RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION TO:
Home
day of
Notary Public
COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE
P.O. Box 20409
Roanoke, VA 24018-0513
0
dress
19
L- 7
NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED
The above application, having been found in due form, is approved
and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of
this calendar year.
X - 4 - '� 5, k'
Date Commisslioner of Reven
The above application is not approved.
Date Commissioner of the Revenue
9