Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7/25/1989 - Adopted Board RecordsAT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 25, 1989 RESOLUTION 72589-4 REQUESTING ASSISTANCE FROM THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IN ADDRESSING TRAFFIC AND CONGESTION PROBLEMS IN THE BOXLEY HILLS SUBDIVISION BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, the residents of Boxley Hills have been negatively impacted by the congestion and traffic caused by automobiles using their community for entrance and egress to Williamson Road, and WHEREAS, these residents have experienced property destruction and other problems associated with this "cruising" activity, and WHEREAS, they have requested assistance from various agencies t alleviate the congestion and property destruction in their neighborhood. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia is requesting assistance from the Virginia Department of Transportation in its efforts to address this problem as follows: 1. That a traffic study be completed for the intersection of Abney Road and Williamson Road to determine whether the intersection warrants traffic signalization. 2. That a review and traffic study of Abney Road from Darby Road to Williamson Road be completed to determine the possibility of restricting the road to oneway traffic only from 8:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. daily. 3. That a study be conducted on the possibility of "No Left Turns" signs for the northbound traffic from the Roanoke City boundary line to Commander Drive during certain specified times. 4. That the Virginia Department of Transportation provide any other recommendations that they deem feasible to provide relief to the residents in this community. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: -None - - A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 7/26/89 CC: File Sheriff Michael Kavanaugh Fred Altizer, Resident Engineer, Transportation Supervisor Bob L. Johnson Va. Department of AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, JULY 25, 1989 RESOLUTION 72589-1 OF APPRECIATION TO COOPER INDUSTRIES AND GARDNER- DENVER FOR AWARD OF 2+2 $10,000 GRANT TO ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS WHEREAS, the Arnold R. Burton Technical School is receiving a three year grant of $10,000 per year from Cooper Industries for involvement in Project PACE; and WHEREAS, Arnold R. Burton is one of only ten schools in the United States to receive this grant; and WHEREAS, the staff and students of the school will be working with Gardner -Denver, the local subsidiary of Cooper Industries, in implementing the program; and WHEREAS, the funds will be used for the Roanoke Regional 2 + 2 project, which trains students from the Counties of Roanoke, Craig and Botetourt and from the Cities of Roanoke and Salem in automated manufacturing technology, preparing the students for careers in that area, and providing an educated workforce for the businesses in the area, thereby benefitting the community as a whole as well as the Roanoke County School system. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, on behalf of itself, and the citizens and business community of Roanoke County, does hereby extend its appreciation to Cooper Industries and Gardner -Denver for their involvement in and contribution to our community. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supevisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File Ruth Wade, Clerk, Roanoke County School Board Tim Gubala, Director, Economic Development AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, JULY 25, 1989 RESOLUTION 72589-2 OF APPRECIATION TO BEN HELMANDOLLAR, ARNOLD BURTON SCHOOL, FOR HIS COORDINATION OF COOPER INDUSTRIES AND GARDNER- DENVER PROJECT PACE WHEREAS, the Arnold R. Burton Technical School has received a three year grant from Cooper Industries for Project PACE; and WHEREAS, Ben Helmandollar, Assistant Principal of Arnold R. Burton Technical School was instrumental in coordinating the application process for the grant; and WHEREAS, Ben Helmandollar has also been instrument in develop- ing the 2 + 2 program, which will educate students in automated manufacturing technology, providing not only a technical back- ground, but also courses in academic subjects, thereby preparing the students for careers in that technology; and WHEREAS, Project PACE will be beneficial to students from the Counties of Roanoke, Botetourt and Craig and the Cities of Salem and Roanoke, as well as the community as a whole. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby extend its appreciation and gratitude to Ben Helmandollar for his leadership and outstanding performance in helping the Roanoke County School System maintain its standards of excellence and service to the citizens of this County in particular and the Valley in general. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supevisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File Ruth Wade, Clerk, Roanoke County School Board Tim Gubala, Director, Economic Development ACTION NUMBER A-72589-3 ITEM NUMBER_ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 25, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Request for $50,000 from Julian Wise Foundation for establishment of a rescue squad museum COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND At the July 11 meeting, 1. B. Heinemann, President of the Julian Stanley Wise Foundation presented a request to the Board of Supervisors for $50,000 to be used towards the establishment of the Julian Wise Rescue Squad Museum. The foundation hopes to raise $1.8 million dollars for the museum and an endowment fund, and plans to seek grants and contributions from local and state governments and businesses. Roanoke City paid for a preliminary fund raising study. As a result of their fund raising efforts, they have received a $500,000 matching grant from the State of Virginia, $8,000 from the Virginia Association of Volunteer Rescue Squad Board of Directors for a museum consultant, and are requesting contributions from other local governments and businessess. The museum would be housed in the expanded Center in the Square and will bring attention to the contributions of the rescue squad volunteers. Following the presentation, the Board of Supervisors requested- that equestedthat the staff investigate funding alternatives and report back with a recommendation for funding. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Roanoke City has appropriated $50,000 as part of its 1989-90 budget process. The City of Salem and Town of Vinton have each appropriated $5,000 in their 1989-90 budget toward the project. Staff has investigated several methods of contributing toward this important project. Unfortunately, funds in the 1989-90 fiscal year budget earmarked for cultural events have been allocated and no funds exist for such a contribution. Staff r offers the following alternatives for funding to the Julian Wise Foundation: Alternative #1: Appropriate $5,000 from the Board Contingency Fund to contribute to the Julian Wise Foundation. The Foundation may then request the additional funding from Roanoke County during the 1990-91 budget process. Alternative #2 Appropriate $15,000 from the unappropriated balance for 1989-90. Additional allocations for $15,000 and $20,000 will be included in the 1990-91 and 1991-92 budget requests. Alternative #3 Appropriate the full $50,000 contribution to the Foundation from the unappropriated balance. Alternative #4 Do not allocate any funds toward this project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Alternative #1, that the Board of Supervisors authorize a $5,000 contribution to the Julian Wise Foundation from the Board Contingency Fund. The Foundation may then request additional funding during the 1990-91 budget process to be considered with other requests from cultural organizations. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/Bob Yes No Abs Denied ( ) L. Johnson to approve Alternative Garrett x Received ( ) #1 Johnson x Referred McGraw x To: Nickens x Robers x cc: File Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Tommy Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 25, 1989 RESOLUTION 72589-4 REQUESTING ASSISTANCE FROM THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IN ADDRESSING TRAFFIC AND CONGESTION PROBLEMS IN THE BOXLEY HILLS SUBDIVISION BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, the residents of Boxley Hills have been negatively impacted by the congestion and traffic caused by automobiles using their community for entrance and egress to Williamson Road, and WHEREAS, these residents have experienced property destruction and other problems associated with this "cruising" activity, and WHEREAS, -`=they have requested assistance from various agencies tea=--tzs"aieviate the congestion and property destruction in their neighborhood. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors ? of Roanoke County, Virginia is requesting assistance from the Virginia Department of Transportation in its efforts to address t� this problem as follows: 1. That a traffic study be completed for the intersection of Abney Road and Williamson Road to determine whether the intersection warrants traffic signalization. 2. That a review and traffic study of Abney Road from Darby Road to Williamson Road be completed to determine the Possibility of restricting the road to oneway traffic only from 8:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. daily. 3. That a study be conducted on the possibility of "No Left Turns" signs for the northbound traffic from the Roanoke City boundary line to Commander Drive during certain specified times. 4. That the Virginia Department of Transportation provide any other recommendations that they deem feasible to provide relief to the residents in this community. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None -- A COPY TESTS: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 7/26/89 CC: File Sheriff Michael Kavanaugh Fred Altizer, Resident Engineer, Va. Department of Transportation Supervisor Bob L. Johnson AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JULY 25, 1989 RESOLUTION 72589-5 AUTHORIZING APPLICATION TO THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY TO BORROW MONEY FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS FOR SCHOOL PURPOSES WHEREAS, a determination has been made that the County School Board of Roanoke County needs to institute a program of asbestos removal in certain school facilities; and WHEREAS, said School Board has identified certain major capital site and building improvements and renovations necessary to conduct an appropriate educational program; and WHEREAS, on July 13, 1989, the County School Board of Roanoke County adopted a resolution authorizing application to the Virginia Public School Authority for these purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the application of the County School Board of Roanoke County to borrow money to institute a program of asbestos removal in certain school facilities and to complete certain major capital site and building improvements and renovations is hereby approved and supported. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this approval and support includes a sum of money not to exceed $1,115,000 for such purposes. FURTHER that the Clerk is hereby directed to forward a certified copy of this resolution to the County School Board of Roanoke County and the Virginia Public School Authority. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: • CJLL-p—�� Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supevisors cc: File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Ruth Wade, Clerk, Roanoke County School Board Virginia Public School Authority Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget ACTION NO. A-72589-6 ITEM NUMBER D -Z7/- AT"7/" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 27, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to execute a contract with Mental Health Services and to Appropriate $12,000 (F. Y. 89-90) to Provide Therapeutic Recreation Services for Adult Chronically Mentally Ill COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND• Roanoke County provides comprehensive Recreation Division Therapeutics program services for 1,450 participants with one or more developmental disabilities: visual impairments, head injury, hearing impairments and physical disabilities. Therapeutics also offers opportunities for "mainstream" integration of the handicapped into general public recreation programs. Since 1977, State Mental Health Services has provided Roanoke County financial assistance (F.Y. 1989-90: $21,160) for mentally retarded recreation program services. Due to the limited resources, therapeutic recreation program services have not previously been provided for adults with long term chronic mental illness difficulties. During 1988, 1,696 patients were admitted to local hospitals for psychiatric care and several thousand additional residents received outpatient services. Through Parks and Recreation Department staff initiative, State Mental Health Services has agreed to purchase $12,000 of related mental health recreation program services from Roanoke County for F.Y. 1989-90, with expectation to continue contractual services in future budget cycles. The proposed program will consist of providing funding for a part-time Recreation Technician (900 hours per annum), RADAR/CORTRAN transportation services and expendable program supplies. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley has offered to purchase $12,000 worth of Roanoke County recreation services to provide therapeutic services for the adult chronically mentally ill population at no direct cost to the County, during F.Y. 1989-90. Mental Health Services intends to continue the purchase of uninterrupted services in future years. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACT: Alternative #1: Authorize a F.Y. 1989-90 appropriation of $12,000, to provide recreation therapeutic adult chronically mentally ill program services with the provision that all related expenditures will be fully reimbursed through a purchase agreement with Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley. Financial impact: financially self-sustaining program service. Alternative #2: Do not authorize a $12,000 F.Y. 1989-90 appropriation for aforementioned program services and continue not to offer therapeutic recreation program services to the adult chronically mentally ill population. RECOMMENDATION• Approval of Alternative #1. Respectfully submitted, .John M. Chambliss, Jr. Assistant Administrator Approved Denied Received Referred To Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ ( )Steven A. McGraw to approve Alter -Garrett ( )native #1 Johnson ( ) McGraw ( ) Nickens Robers cc: File John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Steve Carpenter, Director, Parks & Recreation Paul Mahoney, County Attorney VOTE No Yes Abs x X x x x y ACTION NO. A-72589-7 ITEM NUMBER S AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 25, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to Participate in the Valley -Wide Library Automation Project COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: �V y0 7'e:�e BACKGROUND: On June 27, 1989, County staff presented a work session to the Board of Supervisors explaining the concept of the Valley -wide Library Automation System and describing the estimated cost from the bids received. The proposed system would encompass services provided by the library systems of the City of Roanoke, City of Salem and County of Roanoke. Library operations are very labor and paper intensive with multiple records being developed for each branch, listing information concerning author, title and subject matter for the various items in the systems collection. Automation would allow this manual process to be entered once and be available at all participating branch libraries. There are a number of cooperative efforts currently in force within the Valley Library System including the universal library card, where residents of the three Valley jurisdictions may borrow from any of the libraries in the Valley system by using one card; the microfiche version of the Union Catalog, which allows patrons to research at any of the branch libraries, (however, this does not tell of the availability of the item on the shelf); and a delivery service, whereby borrowed items may be returned to any branch library in the system. The final selection of the vendor will be determined by the number of libraries participating in this project, which will determine the size and cost of the equipment to be purchased. At this time, it appears that the City of Roanoke will proceed with the automation of its library system. The City of Salem has indicated a desire to participate, however, recognizes that its share of the costs may be somewhat higher should the County not participate in the project. 1 -D-5 Statistics: Listed below are several statistics comparing the relationship between the County and the entire Roanoke Valley as it pertains to circulation, number of items in the total collection and number of registered patrons within the Valley library system. Item County Valley Annual Circulation 600,000 1,170,000 Transactions 1,200,000 2,340,000 Items in Collection 235,000 771,000 Titles in Collection 87,500 277,400 New Volumes Cataloged Annually 14,133 33,513 Serial Pieces (Magazine Type) 6,525 27,759 Registered Patrons 26,000 70,000 Conversion Process: The Valley libraries have already participated in a first step of the conversion process by going to the microfiche Union Catalog, which required putting the basic data together in machine readable format (computer readable). The vendor will handle conversion of this data base for the new system and training of the staff in the use of the equipment. The locality will be responsible for the labeling and matching of information, for adding additional information about library patrons and for loading information that is not already on computer. Cost: See Attachment A Advantages in participating in the Valley -wide library automation project: There are several improvements to the services provided to the library patrons by participating in a library automation project. Cataloging - This module provides Valley -wide access to the total collection within the Valley library system and eliminates the many files necessary to provide the information to patrons at all branch libraries. Also, various statistical and management type reports are available, which help in the planning of the materials to be considered for order. Acquisitions - This module allows immediate determination of the status of books and items which are on order, thus minimizing the likelihood of duplicate orders and should improve the effectiveness of cooperative purchases among the participating libraries. E _D-5 Circulation - This module is probably the most easily recognized part of a library automation system. This module allows the immediate determination of the shelf status of items (is the item available and where), allows the user to reserve items which are not currently available, controls inventory, identifies and blocks delinquent patrons from being allowed to check out additional materials from any of the participating branch libraries, identifies delinquent borrowers and automatically prepares overdue notices, and assists in determining usage patterns of the library system. On Line Catalog - This module provides improved search capabilities. Inquiries may be made as to the author's name, title of books, or related subject matter. This system also provides print out capabilities, thus allowing the patron to develop their own bibliography of related materials. Concerns if the County does not participate at this time in the Valley -wide library project: The possibility exists that several operational changes will be experienced should some of the Valley libraries not participate in the project at this time. While not insurmountable, these changes may be noticeable in the provision of service by the various libraries. The Universal Library Card now in use is an embossed card used to operate the charging machine. The Valley libraries will continue to use this type of card and affix a bar code label to the card to operate the new automated system. This process will allow the universal card concept to continue for our residents as well as those of Botetourt County. The Microfiche Union Catalog would no longer be necessary under an automated system since this and much more detailed information would be included in the database. The automated system could provide a machine readable file which could be converted to microfiche and copied as necessary by any library not participating in the consolidated project to continue the present level of service. The cost of this conversion process would be the responsibility of non -automated libraries and could be more expensive than current services. Delivery System, whereby patrons may return books to any library within the system could be curtailed should one system impose a fine system for overdue materials. It would also cause a delay in updating the availability of returned items to the automated database. The calculation of the fine due and the tracking of monies collected would be above and beyond the level of service required today. 3 —D-,S� ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACT: Staff recognizes that this project represents only one of the many major capital projects and needs which have been suggested to or identified by the Board of Supervisors and that the funding for this project was not included in the 1989-90 fiscal year budget. The Library Board has consented to using up to $60,000 of the operating monies allocated to the library for this fiscal year to enable the project to proceed assuming that financing could be arranged and that additional monies could be made available in future year's budgets to pay the debt service (loan payments). The ongoing maintenance, and communications costs must be absorbed within future operations budgets of the library and are estimated to be $30,000 per year. Alternative #1: Endorse the concept of the Valley -Wide Library Automation System, encourage the City of Roanoke to select the system with the proper capacity and growth potential which would allow expansion to include the County of Roanoke, one of the area colleges, or others to join the system at a later date. The County could consider participating once we have capital monies available to acquire our share of the equipment and buy into the central part of the system. Alternative #2: Allow the City of Roanoke to contract with the vendor, install the system, and front the cost of the system. The County would use $60,000 from the Library operating budget to cover the cost of converting the files, installing the terminals and paying the City for a good - faith payment (down payment) for the system. The balance ($300,000) would be repaid to the City over the next three years based upon the terms included in an operating contract concerning the governance of the system. (Approx. $113,000 per year assuming current bond rates.) Alternative #3: City and County officials have also discussed the possibility of allowing an offset of costs with this project whereby the County would front the monies for land acquisition etc. for the land fill, the City would front the monies for the library automation project, and each could operate under a user contract until the respective share of the costs have been offset (paid). Alternative #4: Do not participate in the Valley -Wide Library Automation System. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #2, which allows the City to contract with the vendor, install the system, front the cost of the system and allow the County to use $60,000 from the Library operating budget to convert its files, install the terminals and prepare for the automated system. The balance ($300,000) would be repaid to the 4 City of Roanoke over the next three fiscal years at approximately $113,000 per year assuming current bond rates of 6.25%. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, AA C7 J hn M. Chambliss4,"' ,Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Assistant Administrator County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( Motion by: R i r -h a rdW_ hA r c No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Steven A- Mr -Craw to approveGarrett x Received ( ) Alternative #2 �— Johnson x Referred ( ) McGraw x To ( ) Nickens x Robers x cc: File John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator George Garretson, Director, Libraries Reta Busher, Director, Managment & Budget Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance 5 Attachment A ROANOKE AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY AUTOMATION PROJECT COST ESTIMATE Central site hardware Telecomm. Hardware Software Miscellaneous Online user stations (111 @ 1129/station) System total cost Library preparation cost TOTAL RKE CITY RKE CO SALEM 50% 42% 8% 333,547 166,773 140,089 26,683 209,495 104,747 87,987 16,759 85,000 42,500 35,700 6,800 58,451 29,225 24,549 4,676 125,375 75,643 37,257 12,419 (67) (33) (11) 811,868 418,888 325,582 67,337 97,125 55,858 15,644 Onetime project cost total 516,013 381,440 82,981 Monthly maintenance and 5,949 2,974 2,498 476 telecommunications cost Additional cost considerations: Personnel Back-up circulation equipment Supplies Miscellaneous cost includes training, shipping, installation, performance bond, etc. Library Preparation Cost includes site preparation, tape processing, bar code labels, labor, etc. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 25, 1989 RESOLUTION NO. 72589-8 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for July 25, 1989, designated as Item I - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 5, inclusive, as follows: 1. Ratification of revision to the By-laws of the Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley. 2. Acceptance of of Stone Mill Drive, Millwheel Drive, Falcon Ridge Road and Kildeer Circle into the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System. 3. Request for acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Oakcliff Townhouses. 4. Request for acceptance of Fallowater Lane into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 5. Donation of a sewer easement from LOBO Investors to the Board of Supervisors. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTS: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 7/26/89 CC: File Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering Clifford Craig, Utility Director Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 25, 1989 RESOLUTION 72589-8a RATIFYING THE REVISIONS TO THE BY-LAWS OF THE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, Title 17.1 Chapter 10 of the Code of Virginia requires ratification by the participating local governments of any revisions to the by-laws of the Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley, and WHEREAS, on June 22, 1989, the Board of Directors of the Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley passed revisions to their by-laws; and WHEREAS, the organization is now requesting that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ratify these revisions as required by the Code of Virginia. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County has reviewed the By-laws of the Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley and ratifies the revisions passed by the Board of Directors. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None 7/26/89 CC: File Mental Clerk, Clerk, Clerk, Clerk, Clerk, Mental A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Health Services City of Roanoke Town of Vinton City of Salem Botetourt County Craig County Health Services of the Roanoke Valley File ACTION NO. A -72589-8.b ITEM NUMBER --4— -z AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 25, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of Stone Mill Drive, Millwheel Drive, Falcon Ridge Road and Kildeer Circle into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Highways COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County has received acknowledgment that the following roads has been accepted into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation. - 0.14 miles of Stone Mill Drive effective July 3, 1989 - 0.06 miles of Millwheel Drive effective July 3, 1989 - 0.40 miles of Falcon Ridge Road effective July 13, 1989 - 0.09 miles of Kildeer Circle effective July 13, 1989 SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board (�4 & Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/ Yes No Abs Denied ( ) Harry C. Nickens Garrett x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred McGraw x To: Nickens x Robers x cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering ACTION NO. A -72589-8.c ITEM NUMBER "- 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 25, 1989 SUBJECT: Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Oakcliff Townhouses COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Oakcliff Townhouses, Conner -Templeton LTD have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sewer lines serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sewer lines are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Hurt & Proffitt, Inc., entitled Oakcliff Townhouses, dated November 22, 1988 which are on file in the Engineering Department. The water and sewer line construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT: The values of the water and sewer construction are $34,000 and $41,000 respectively. RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. cc: SUBMITTED BY: Phi7lip T. Henry, P . Director of Engineering APPROVED: del Z"� Elmer C. Hodg County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved (X) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Harry No Yes Abs Denied ( ) C. Nickens Garrett x Received ( ) Johnson _x Referred McGraw —x To Nickens _x Robers x File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Paul Mahoney, County Attorney 2 NORTH COMMUNITY SERVICES ACCEPTANCE OF WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES SERVING OARCLIFF TOWNHOUSES AND DEVELOPMENT 3 0 AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 25, 1989 RESOLUTION 72589-8.d REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF FALLOWATER LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Fallowater Lane from its intersection with Starkey Road (Route 904) to the existing end of State Maintenance on Fallowater Lane (Route 795) for a distance of 0.32 miles to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have been dedicated by virtue of a certain map/maps known as Tanglewood Executive Park which map was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 112, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on October 30, 1987 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. t 3. That said road known as Fallowater Lane and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections and copy for Virginia Department of Transportation cc: ACTION NO. A -72589-8.e ITEM NO. =— AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 25, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of a sewer easement from LOBO Investors to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND• SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of a twenty (20) foot sewer easement from LOBO Investors to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors through Tax Parcel No. 86.07-1-3.1 located between Section 4 of Canterbury Park and Section 6 of Steeplehunt of Canterbury Park. The location and dimensions of this donated easement has been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. This easement provides a connection between an existing 20 foot easement in Section 6 of Canterbury Park and an existing 15 foot easement in Section 4. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of this sewer easement. Respectfully submitted, Rt -LR, mj��, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by Bob L. Johnson/ Garrett x Denied ( ) Harry C. Nickens Johnson x Received ( ) McGraw x Referred Nickens x to Robers x File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Paul Mahoney, County Attorney UW OFFICES JOLLY. PLACE. OLIN & PRILLAMAN. P.C. THIS DEED OF EASEMENT made this 11th day of April, 1989, by and between LOBO INVESTORS, a Virginia general partnership, Grantor, and BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, Grantee, and ELMER C. HODGE, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, party of the third part. W I T N E S S E T H That for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00), cash in hand paid by the Grantee unto the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of all of which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantor does hereby BARGAIN, SELL, GRANT, and CONVEY, with General Warranty and Modern English Covenants unto the Grantee, an easement for the location, construction, reconstruction, enlargement, inspection, repair, and maintenance of a sanitary sewer line, this easement being a perpetual easement through the lands of the Grantor together with the right of ingress to and egress from the same, for the location, construction, enlargement, inspection, repair and maintenance of a sanitary sewer line or lines and for any additional line or lines to be installed within this easement, this easement being twenty (20) feet wide, together with the right to install lateral service lines from the line or lines, if any additional line or lines be installed within said easement, and appurtenances at any point within this easement. The County agrees, as evidenced by the acceptance of this easement to repair or replace existing fences, walks, pavement, and or other improvements such as trees and shrubbery only outside the permanent 1 -1- — E easement herein granted, upon the property which may be damaged in construction of, or in the course of ingress and egress for subsequent inspection, repair and maintenance of the above said project. Grantor agrees that the County will not be expected to restore the property to the identical original condition, but rather as near thereto as is practicable. Grantor further agrees to cooperate with the County in effectuating such restoration and not to obstruct the easement without the written permission of the County. The perpetual easement is identified as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the dividing line between Lots 39 and 40, according to Plat of Section No. 4, Canterbury Park (P. B. 10, page 44), and also being the centerline of an existing 15 ft. sanitary sewer easement; thence S. 880 39' 10" W. 65.37 feet to a point; thence N. 520 25' 04" W. 238.91 feet to a point; thence N. 4° 47' 36" W. 151.47 feet to a point; thence N. 211 57' 58" E. 196.37 feet to a point; thence N. 610 06' 00" W. 245.52 feet to a point, on an existing 20 ft. sanitary sewer easement located at the northeasterly corner of Lot 7, according to plat of Section No. 6, SteepleHunt of Canterbury Park (P. B. 11, page 75), all as more fully shown on a "Plat Showing New 20' Sanitary Sewer Easement through Tax Parcel #86.07-1-3.1, being granted to Roanoke Countyl Board of Supervisors by Lobo Investors, a Va. general partnership" prepared by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, P. C., Engineers - Surveyors, dated March 8, 1989, attached hereto and made a part hereof." Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, party of the third part, joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance by said Board of Supervisors of the easement granted herein pursuant to Ordinance No. adopted by the Board of Supervisors. LAW OFFICES JOLLY. PLACE. JN & PRILLAMAN. P.C. E , v i `h `•^Y N S E ?4 � � m v � 552' ► o 0 :ems° o � I� 3� �c��P" N _ �1y�cS �I f_ 9 �OmZ a• v- G�a Vtl m o o 34 I �' X130 -% 1p � 94 40 �, J1 � co Y♦3�Z e `z y \ b " .• W E w m Zm vlt� M n H r O � m ' o z z i m vmn _ z H z < o m a m oor+ II M M Z m En --1 G3 o O = fa 7181 Ndi a :'1 �' cn r o n H" 0 o o M n a O ;lu to c w --1 In z l*1 n � , ° > z ro 11 y m�e ty � �+ O M� A H D D z < i z n b�u A C7 -< N `I 9 K R' y y D v� r- In o a 0 44, n o hf M s �ii m M m m tv A z 6) Q to n C K z H n yGo c O m D i qvB. 5 r m o m v l n q z m G 1 S� Q n -moi 1 m w -Z'1 O •�\ n W n t z m In ro m In --. v AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY , VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 25, 1989 RESOLUTION 72589-9 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on July 25, 1989 pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia Law. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTS: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 7/26/89 CC: File Executive Session File AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 25, 1989 ORDINANCE 72589-10 VACATING A 25 -FOOT UNIMPROVED RIGHT- OF-WAY KNOWN AS "JONES STREET", SECTION 1, DWIGHT HILLS WHEREAS, Charles M. and Mary N. Vandergrift have requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate a 25 -foot unimproved right-of-way known as "Jones Street" as shown in Plat Book 3, at page 5 of record in the Clerk's Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1- 431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on July 11, 1989; and the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on July 25, 1989. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a 25 -foot unimproved right-of-way known as "Jones Street" (from the intersection of Jones Street and Nover Avenue east approximately 130 feet) of record in Plat Book 3, at page 5, Section 1, Dwight Hills in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That as a condition of the adoption of this ordinance, a twenty- 12.5 -foot water/sewer easement be retained by Roanoke County I as shown on the attached map dated 6/7/89 prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering Department; 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 4. That Charles M. and Mary H. Vandergrift shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transac- tion. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to approve and amend to reflect 12.5 foot easement, paragraph 2, seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supevisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections (Certified Copy) Terry Harrington, Director, Planning Paul Mahoney, County Attorney John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JULY 25, 1989 ORDINANCE 72589-11 PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE "GENERAL DISTRICT COURT DRIVER IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM" AND PROVIDING FOR THE SUPERVISION AND CONTROL OF SUCH PROGRAM; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EMERGENCY WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, is desirous of authorizing the "General District Court Driver Improvement Program," in cooperation with the Roanoke Valley Alcohol Safety Action Program; and WHEREAS, the "General District Court Driver Improvement Program" to be established by the General District Court, Twenty- third Judicial District, will be self-supporting, operating from money collected as fees from program participants, and will not involve expenditure of any funds appropriated by the County of Roanoke. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The establishment of the "General District Court Driver Improvement Program" by the General District Court, Twenty-third Judicial District, be, and hereby is, ratified, confirmed, and approved. 2. Such program shall be administered by the Chief Judge of the General District Court, Twenty-third Judicial District, through the Roanoke Valley Alcohol Safety Action Program in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Virginia, as amended, with participation restricted to referrals from the General District Court. 3. The "General District Court Driver Improvement Program" G shall be self-supporting and operated wholly from funds collected as fees from program participants, with each person participating in the program to be required to pay a fee of $30.00, or such other sum as may be fixed pursuant to law for participating in this program. 4. In order to provide for the usual daily operation of the municipal government, an emergency is deemed to exist, and this ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supevisors cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Michael F. Kavanaugh, Sheriff Edward S. Kidd, Jr., Chief Judge, General District Court Roanoke Valley Alcohol Safety Action Program ACTION NO. A-72589-12 ITEM NUMBER L — / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 25, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session on Affirmative Action Plan COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: i r SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: ' Attached is a draft of the Affirmative Action Plan. The first draft of this plan was received by the Board of Supervisors on July 11, 1989, at the regular meeting. The attached plan was prepared by Mary Hicks of the County Administrator's Office. Guidance was provided by the Department of Human Resources and the plan was reviewed by an outside consultant. At this time, the Board will be asked to review the proposed plan. Suggestions can be incorporated in a final document which can be brought to the Board for acceptance at the next meeting. To ensure its success, the program should be administered under the authority of the County Administrator through the Department of Human Resources. During implementation, each department will be reviewed to seek out opportunities for recruitment and advancement of women and minorities. Specific goals will be set and emphasis will be placed on training of those already on staff. To provide guidance during implementation of the plan, an Affirmative Action Advisory Committee will be established. This committee will also participate in the ongoing process of program evaluation and development of a training program. This plan will provide the mechanism within our present resources to expand career opportunities for women and minorities now employed by Roanoke County and will encourage recruitment of women and minorities as positions become available. FISCAL IMPACT: No additional funding or additional personnel are necessary. Existing budgets will be used for training and the plan will be administered by the Department of Human Resources. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board review the attached Affirmative Action Plan. Your suggestions and comments will be incorporated and the plan will be brought back for adoption on August 8, 1989. APPROVED BY: Elmer C. lHodge County Administrator SUBMITTED BY: D. K. Cook Director of Human Resources ACTION Approved (x) Motion by: Lee Garrett/ Denied ( ) Harry C. Nickens to Received ( ) adopt plan Referred To cc: File D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources Assistant County Administrators Constitutional -Officers Department Heads * *Agenda Report Only VOTE No Yes Abs Garrett x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x Robers x a AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY , VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY,JULY 25, 1989 RESOLUTION 72589-13 SUPPORTING THE GOALS OF THE VALLEYWIDE ANTI-DRUG ASSOCIATION e 1 J WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley is experiencing an increase in the use of drugs, and WHEREAS, the negative results of drug usage such as increased crime, domestic violence and battered and neglected children is not limited to any one locality but is a problem shared by all localities; and WHEREAS, solutions to the serious problem must be found through a commitment of many agencies and citizens, working together to eliminate this threat to our communities. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia supports the efforts of the VALLEYWIDE ANTI-DRUG ASSOCIATION and its public awareness program. FURTHER, The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia wishes to express its appreciation to this organization for focusing attention on this very serious problem. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Robers, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTS: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 7/26/89 CC: File David B. Clayton, Valleywide Drug Anti -Drug Association