HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/15/1989 - Adopted Board RecordsAT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 1989
RESOLUTION 111589-1 OF APPRECIATION TO THE CITY OF
RICHMOND FOR ASSISTANCE DURING HURRICANE HUGO
WHEREAS, Roanoke County sustained major damage from
irrr�aiiigo,. :and an►aAy;rsR�� ` bl�bc�C$d' axi'..,poe='nes
downed by trees and branches; and
WHEREAS, the equipment which was needed to assist with
cleaning away the storm damage was unavailable in the Roanoke
Valley; and
WHEREAS, the City of Richmond, Virginia, offered to loan
Roanoke County the necessary equipment; and
WHEREAS, employees of the City of Richmond transported
the equipment to Roanoke County, enabling county crews to remain
on the job during the emergency situation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors, on behalf of itself and the citizens and the
employees of the County, does hereby convey its deepest
appreciation and gratitude for the assistance provided by the City
of Richmond and its employees during the aftermath of Hurricane
Hugo.
On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor
Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisor Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Gardner Smith, Director, General Services
Resolutions of Appreciation File
♦ .3`a'.i �. r :: ,:''.�c.. *i.. ay,. V ya.*
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 1989
RESOLUTION 111589-2 ENDORSING SUPPORT FOR STATE
FUNDING FOR ADULT LONG-TERM CARE AND TRANSPORTATION
SERVICES
WHEREAS, the elderly population of Virginia continues to
grow at a more rapid pace than the general population; and
WHEREAS, a substantial proportion of the elderly are
poor, frail, and disabled in need of special services; and
WHEREAS, there are unmet needs to the aging in the area
of long-term care. These services include day support, respite
care, case management, homebound meals, Ombudsman programs; and in-
home services; and
WHEREAS, there is documented unmet needs for
transportation services to the aging population; and
WHEREAS, a network of twenty-five area agencies on aging
has been established throughout the Commonwealth to administer a
comprehensive, coordinated system of services to older Virginians;
and
WHEREAS, the services administered by these area agencies
on aging are being provided to elderly persons in greatest social
and economic need in an effort to prevent costly
institutionalization that has a significant impact on the State's
Medicaid budget.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke County Board
of Supervisors hereby urges the Governor of Virginia and the
Virginia General Assembly to appropriate $22.6 million for long-
term care services and $3.5 million for transportation services as
requested by the Virginia Department of Aging for the next biennium
to maintain life sustaining services to frail and disadvantaged
older Virginians.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote:
ry
�'R -� '�,:.'C ks ` r�i�' aFi' .. _ i. r' w ,u:. ' ,�, j£'�. 4:1t.%,i' :iQ;��•rC�;ti t• r ._ `. v:;
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Susan Williams, Executive Director, League of Older Americans
Prentiss Webb, Chairman, Virginia Coalition for the Aging
Roanoke Valley Legislators
ACTION NUMBER # A-111589-3
ITEM NUMBER -2) —.3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: November 15, 1989
a. ::y. _ _ _..::'cafi�r-'��+L�:i: �?.s.:..�4;4iQ��'�+S;ter+rTn'�^Tx��"'�.��:�+'%7�f+.��r+'.r4�'±•r'�`i:*R.�'�',�.r�•=!l�,'X►��r.:r,�%7i#k..!'s:�i't+R'IC".1
Program ,......
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKBROUND:
On September 12, 1989, the Board of Supervisors authorized County
staff to obtain proposals for employee dental insurance coverage
for regular full-time employees, including employees in the
Department of Social Services, and employees of the School
Board. At that time County staff also recommended that dental
insurance coverage be implemented on January 1, 1990. As
previously discussed, the addition of an employee dental
insurance program has been considered by County staff; however,
funding for this program has not been possible in the past. A
dental insurance program has also been previously requested by
County employees.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The County Department of Procurement Services received three
proposals for employee dental insurance coverage. A committee
composed of Jerry Hardy (Schools/Finance), Diane Hyatt (Finance),
and Keith Cook (Human Resources) evaluated the proposals received.
The committee also used the services of an independent insurance
consultant to assist with specifications and analysis of
proposals in selecting the company which would be the most cost
effective for the County and the employees. The committee
considered proposal options offered by the Delta Dental Plan of
Virginia and Dentalcare (underwritten by Shenandoah Life
Insurance Company) as the best proposals received, and additional
information was obtained from these two firms regarding their
proposals. A summary of the proposal options received is
included as Attachment A of this report.
.,(J -3
Board of Supervisors
Page Two
November 14, 1989
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS
Alternative 1
:iyrX:"i?":?'�y, ar'i;v �. i. -*, .t; .; .y..-,+i�. ia48y:�.1 �. ,t�f--^`...,V'!rl h*'S K+r"*ir z`t'i•�.�.+',l, �y'r'c'ti: i Yi 'r'4 '�tijc�:...'K iht`4C!�rT. ii 'x �y tv ,x'i+r,7.1 3+'yt%t ``
rtae be]Ma.
...co .Qnsder ng.:.,th,e 'RrRPQ9,al, opti.Qns..o:f,.th:e.
Delta Dental Plan of Virginia, Option III is considered the best
option proposed.
The level of coverage recommended under Option III is presented
as follows:
OPTION III
I. Diagnostic and Preventive Services 100% (UCR)
II. Basic Services 80%
III. $25 Deductible for Basic Services (limit 3 deductibles per
family)
IV. Maximum benefit $1,000 per contract year
V. Periodontics covered as other services ($300 annual cap)
The cost of providing dental insurance coverage under this
option for regular full-time County employees and Department of
Social Services employees would be $55,679 annually. The cost of
providing dental insurance coverage for regular full-time and
part-time contract School Board employees would be $158,281
annually, with a total yearly cost to the County for providing
dental insurance coverage for all County, Social Services, and
eligible School Board employees of $213,960.
Funding in the amount of $106,980 would be required from the
unappropriated balance to fund dental insurance coverage for six
months of the fiscal year beginning Jaunary 1, 1990. This cost
projection is based on the County providing ninty percent of the
employee's premium, with the employee providing funding for
dependent or family coverage. A summary of the costs associated
with the proposal option of the Delta Dental Plan of Virginia is
included as Attachment B of this report.
Board of Supervisors
Page Three
November 14, 1989
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS (Continued)
Alternative 2
r • .•.kA; t :in ..
f "Tie .propo.�sa� o "''t h aYca �e' '"s' "mese i e ` in is' erna i'v�.
7.considering„toe prop;osa1-pptipns ,of i�eata'lcare., Opt�.on IV is
considered the best option proposed.
The level of coverage recommended under Option IV is presented as
follows:
OPTION IV
I. Diagnostic and Preventive Services 100% (UCR)
II. Basic Services 80%
III. $25 deductible for Basic Services
IV Maximum benefit $1,000 per contract year
V. Periodontics covered as other services ($300 annual cap)
The cost of providing dental insurance coverage under this
option for regular full-time County employees and Department of
Social Services employees would be $53,605 annually. The cost of
providing dental insurance coverage for regular full-time and
part-time contract School Board employees would be $152,388
annually, with a total yearly cost to the County for providing
dental insurance coverage for all County, Social Services, and
eligible School Board employees of $205,992.
Funding in the amount of $102,996 would be required from the
unappropriated balance to fund dental insurance coverage for six
months of the fiscal year beginning Juanary 1, 1990. This cost
projection is based on the County providing ninty percent of the
employee's premium, with the employee providing funding for
dependent or family coverage. A summany of the costs associated
with the proposal option of Dentalcare is included as
Attachment C of this report.
103
Board of Supervisors
Page Four
November 14, 1989
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends the approval of Alternative 1 and that the
.o.._:,the Delta Dental Plan, of Virginia, Option III; be
accepted by the Board. It is .also recommended . that.. f.und;.ng;:.ba,.:...:.:...:,
provided :to. implement .employee dental in-suranc:0:..:co.v.e:z�g e..�fcar.......
regular full-time County employees, including employees in the
Department of Social Services, and regular full-time and other
eligible contract School Board employees, effective January 1,
1990.
Although the proposal alternative recommended is higher in cost
for the County, this proposal offers three rate structures
(employee only coverage, two person coverage, and family
coverage). The proposal option of Dentalcare offers only two
rate structures (employee only coverage and family coverage).
The proposal recommended also offers the advantage of a
participating provider dentist network in which dental providers
agree to accept the usual, customary and reasonable charges
established by the Delta Dental Plan of Virginia. This
alternative also offers an advantage in the claims forms
acceptance among most dental providers. In the review process,
the committee evaluated dental programs of other major employers
within the Roanoke area, and the Delta Dental Plan of Virginia
was identified as the major carrier of these programs. The
Committee also considered the length of time that Delta Dental
Plan of Virginia and Dentalcare have been providing dental
insurance programs.
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED:
0010
D. K. Cook Elmer C. Hodge
Director of Human Resources County Administrator
cc: File
Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources
Assistant County Administrators
ACTION
VOTE
Approved
(X) Motion By: Steven A. MCGraw/
No Yes Abs
Denied
( ) Lee Garrett o approve
Garrett
x
Received
Delta Dentai Pian
Johnson
Absent
Referred
McGraw
x
To
Nickens
X
Robers
x
cc: File
Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources
Assistant County Administrators
Board of Supervisors
Page Five
November 14, 1989
ROANOKE COUNTY EMPLOYEES
AND
ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES
DENTAL BENEFIT DESIGN
ATTACILMIE 'T A
Page 1 of 4
1)-3
aoard of Supervisors
Page Six
November 14, 1989
DELTA DENTAL
OPTION I
I. Diagnostic and Preventive Services 100$ (UCR)
II. Basic Services 80%
III. No Deductible
IV. Maximum.benefit $.1,000 per contract year
V Periodontics $.300 per contract.year,
OPTION II
I. Diagnostic and Preventive Services 100% (UCR)
II. Basic Services 80%
III. No Deductible
IV. Maximum benefit $1,000 per contract year
Ai., C-- ME -NT A
Page 2 of 4
V. Periodontics covered as other services - No $300 annual cap
OPTION III
I. Diagnostic and Preventive Services 100% (UCR)
II. Basic Services 80%
III. $25 Deductible for Basic Services - limit 3 deductibles per
family.
IV. Maximum benefit $1,000 per contract year
V. Periodontics covered as other services - $300 annual cap
OPTION IV
I. Diagnostic and Preventive Services 100% (UCR)
II. Basic Services 80%
III. $25 Deductible for Basic Services - limit 3 deductibles per
family
IV. Maximum benefit $1,000 per contract year
V. Periodontics covered as other services - No $300 annual cap
Board of Supervisors
Page Seven
November 14, 1989
DENTAL CARE
OPTION I
No Quote
.�:. OPTION II
I. Diagnostic and Preventive Services 100% (OCR)
II. Basic Services 80%
III. No Deductible
IV. Maximum benefit $1,000 per contract year
ATTACHMENT A
Page 3 of 4
-D -3
V. Periodontics covered as other services - No $300 annual cap -
OPTION III
No Quote
OPTION IV
I. Diagnostic and Preventive Services 100% (UCR)
II. Basic Services 80%
III. $25 deductible applies to basic
services.
IV. Maximum benefit $1,000 per contract year
V. Periodontics covered as other services - $300 annual cap -
Board of Supervisors
Page Eight
November 14, 1989
DUKE AND COMPANY
OPTION I
No Quote
OPTION Il'
I. Diagnostic and Preventive Services 100% (UCR)
II. Basic Services 80%
III. No Deductible
IV. Maximum benefit $1,000 per contract year
ATTACHMENT A
Page 4 of 4
Z—Z
V. Periodontics covered as other services - No $300 annual cap
OPTION III
No Quote
OPTION IV
I. Diagnostic and Preventive Services 100% (UCR)
II. Basic Services 80%
111. $25 deductible applies to diagnostic and preventive and basic
services.
IV. Maximum benefit $1,000 per contract year
V. Periodontics covered as other services - No $300 annual cap
Board of Supervisors
Page Nine
November 14, 1989
DENTAL DELTA DENTAL
DENTAL INSURANCE BIDS
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
NOVEMBER 15,1989
MONTHLY MONTHLY
MONTHLY COUNTY NET COST
COVERAGE RATE SUPPLEMENT TO EMPLOYEE
-----------------------------------------------
:.:.EI4PLflYEE . ..•.. -4`8.36 - - - - —IT. -5.2'
EMPLOYEE & 1 MINOR 13.28 7.52
FAMILY 25.56 7.52
5.76
18.04
ATTACHMENT B
0—,B
MONTHLY ANNUAL APPROPRIATION
# OF COUNTY COUNTY NEEDED
COST TO THE COUNTY EMPLOYEES SUPPLEMENT SUPPLEMENT (6 MONTHS)
--- -------------------------------------------------
COUNTY EMPLOYEES 617 $7.52 $55,678.08 $27,839.04
SCHOOL EMPLOYEES
FULL TIME 1553 7.52 140,142.72 70,071.36
BUS DRIVERS,AIDS,&
CAFETERIA WORKERS 201 7.52 18,138.24 9,069.12
----------------------------
$213,959.04 $106,979.52
0
Board of Supervisors
Page Ten
November 14, 1989
DENTALB SHENANDOAL LIFE DENTAL CARE
DENTAL INSURANCE BIDS
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
NOVEMBER 15,1989
ATTACHMENT C
ID -3
MONTHLY
MONTHLY
APPROPRIATION
MONTHLY
COUNTY
NET COST
COVERAGE
-------
RATE
-----------------------------------
SUPPLEMENT
TO EMPLOYEE
EMPLOYEE
$8.04
$7.24
$0.80
EMPLOYEE & 1 MINOR
N/A
N/A
N/A
FAMILY
21.83
7.24
14.59
ATTACHMENT C
ID -3
----------------------------
$205,992.48 $102,996.24
MONTHLY
ANNUAL
APPROPRIATION
COST TO THE COUNTY
# OF
EMPLOYEES
--------------------------------------------
COUNTY
SUPPLEMENT
COUNTY
SUPPLEMENT
NEEDED
(6 MONTHS)
COUNTY EMPLOYEES
617
$7.24
$53,604.96
$26,802.48
SCHOOL EMPLOYEES
FULL TIME
1553
7.24
134,924.64
67,462.32
BUS DRIVERS,AIDS,&
CAFETERIA WORKERS
201
7.24
17,462.88
8,731.44
----------------------------
$205,992.48 $102,996.24
.1 Dr 1 D1 Dd 1 • - .I c• • • • • �. • . • . .,• ••
The Board of Supervisors ("Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia
("County") created the Roanoke County Resource Authority ("Authority") by
resolution adopted June 14, 1989. The Authority was created, among other
things, to provide for the development and operation of a sanitary landfill to
serve the County and such other entities as the Authority may determine
("Project"). The Authority intends to finance the acquisition, construction,
development and equipping of the Project by the issuance of its revenue bonds
("Bonds") and notes in anticipation thereof ("Notes"). The Board has
determined that it is in the best interest of the County to assist the
Authority in the acquisition, construction, development and equipping of the
Project and the financing thereof.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY
OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA:
1. Acquisition of Land. The Board agrees to assist the Authority in
the acquisition of land necessary for the Project. The County Administrator
and such officers and agents of the County as he may designate are authorized
and directed to sell to the Authority such parcels of land awned by the County
at such prices and upon such terms and conditions as the County Administrator
may determine to be used for the Project. It is anticipated that the
Authority will finance the acquisition of such land and such other parcels of
land as may be necessary by the issuance and sale of its Notes in the
principal amount not to exceed $ 4 million. The Board agrees that in the
event that the Bonds are not issued, the Board will purchase from the
Authority the parcels of land acquired by the Authority at a purchase price
equal to the principal amount of the Notes and any interest accrued thereon.
The Board, while recognizing that it is not empowered to make any binding
co mmitment beyond the current fiscal year, states that it is its current
intention to make sufficient appropriations to pay the cost of the acquisition
of such land, in the event that the Bonds are not issued by the Authority.
Nothing in this Resolution or the Notes shall constitute a pledge of the full
faith and credit of the County beyond the constitutionally permitted annual
appropriations.
2. Further Actions. The County Administrator and such officers and
agents of the County as he may designate are each authorized and directed to
prepare, execute, and deliver and and all papers, instruments, opinions,
certificates and other documents and to take such action as they deem
appropriate to carry out the purposes of this Resolution and any such action
previously taken is hereby ratified and confirmed.
3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately.
U
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and
carried by the following reoorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
A CDPY TESI'E:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Roanoke County Resource Authority Files
The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Roanoke, Virginia certifies that the foregoing resolution was duly adpoted at
a meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia duly
called and held on November 15, 1989 and has not been repealed or amended and
remains in full force and effect.
Date: November 15, 1989 �' • \
Clerk, Board of Supervisors of
the County of Roanoke, Virginia
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 1989
RESOLUTION NO. 111589-5 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH
ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM K -
CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain section of the agenda of the
Board of Supervisors for November 15, 1989, designated as Item K
- Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as
to each item separately set forth in said section designated
Iters 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows:
1. Approval of Minutes - February 28, 1989, March 14,
1989, March 28, 1989, April 11, 1989, April 25,
1989.
2. Confirmation of committee appointments to the
Industrial Development Authority and the Planning
Commission.
3. Request for acceptance of Williamsburg Court into
the Virginia Department of Transportation
Secondary System.
4. Request for acceptance of 0.23 miles of Stonewood
Drive into the Virginia Department of
Transportation Secondary System.
5. Authorization to appropriate capital funds for the
Green Hill Park Improvements.
6. AutherisatieR-te-emeeute-a-eeRtEaet-te-establish
an-!Rteg.Fated-auteFaated-1 ibFaEy-system-r
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens with Item 6 removed,
seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and upon the following recorded
vote:
AYES: Supervisors Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
11/21/89
CC: File
Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering
John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator
Steve Carpenter, Director of Parks and Recreation
Arnold Covey, Director of Development & Inspections
ACTION # A -111589-5.a
ITEM NUMBER #t- -2—
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE November 15, 1989
SUBJECT: Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the
Industrial Development Authority and Planning
Commission
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The following nominations were made at the previous board meeting
and must now be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. The
nominee has agreed to serve.
Industrial Development Authority
Supervisor Robers nominated Billy Branch to serve another four-
year term. His term will expire September 26, 1993.
Planning Commission
Supervisor McGraw nominated Wayland Winstead to another four-year
term. His term will expire December 31, 1993.
SUBMITTED BY:
I;v-
Mary H. Allen
Clerk to the Board
APPROVED BY:
X14,''
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ Yes No Abs
Denied ( ) Steven A. McGraw Garrett x
Received ( )
Referred
To:
cc: File
Industrial Development Authority File
Planning Commission File
Johnson Agent
McGraw x
Nickens x
Robers x
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 1989
RESOLUTION 111589-S.b REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
WILLIAMSBURG COURT INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
� ., a:a; a�. J'.. ."Y'+�'T - �i `1'.^'a. c ,. :°:''';;:1 ".;i+r :^ '.y :r-'� yet. _.a .'t 4. ;fr�� ^-�•..,?:s .K+a'. .•his. -.•„4+i.• r>k'�s' ;%t".. -'^.r
..BE IT.RESOLVED•.by the.Board of Supervisors of.Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Williamsburg Court
to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State
Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and
a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore been
dedicated by virtue of a certain map\maps known as Williamsburg
Court Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 11, Page 82,
of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Roanoke County, Virginia, on January 11, 1989 and that by reason
of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers,
nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-
way for drainage.
3. That said road known as Williamsburg Court and which is
shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and
the same is hereby established as public road to become a part of
the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from
and after notification of official acceptance of said street or
highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:. Supervisor Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
14;n �i I. , . � {' "i -. -.
. .4 �� ". OW!, � - % . - %,
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections, and
copy for Virginia Department of Transportation
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 1989
RESOLUTION 111589-S.0 REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
STONEWOOD DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
.. .. P R'.. • f.',✓.: ,i • • r ` :. .e ,1�
Virginia, as -
follows: -
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Stonewood Drive,
from Texas Hollow Road (Route 641) to the cul-de-sac to be accepted
and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under
Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and
a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore been
dedicated by virtue of a certain map\maps known as Section 1,
Stonewood Subdivision which may was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page
130, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Roanoke County, Virginia, on February 3, 1986 and that by reason
of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers,
nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-
way for drainage.
3. That said road known as Stonewood Drive, from Texas
Hollow Road (Route 641) to the cul-de-sac and which is shown on a
certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is
hereby established as public road to become a part of the State
Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after
notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by
the Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisor Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYP: None
.. .,,H,•. ... '.tv, ..�"'". %.. s .•+,r .,•tri a .. •s' ys.
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
A COPY TESTE:
--W
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections, and
copy for Virginia Department of Transportation
i
ACTION NO. A -111589-5.d
ITEM NUMBER A< — -,s--
AT
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: November 15, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Appropriation of Monies to the Development of
Green Hill Park from the Proceeds of the Sale of
10 Acres: in, the Glenvar West Section of Roanoke
County :.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
At the October 24, 1989 meeting, the Board of Supervisors
approved a sale of 10 acres of land in the Glenvar West section of
Roanoke County to Atlantic and Pacific Inc., for a total of
$230,000. In accordance with the provisions of the Roanoke County
Charter, these proceeds from the sale of a capital asset must be
placed in a capital fund.
The Board of Supervisors has previously committed to the
citizens of this area that it will replace parks & recreational
facilities lost through the sale of said properties for economic
development purposes. The staff, therefore, recommends that the
net proceeds ($230,000 less any closing expenses or other costs
associated with the disposal of this ten acre tract of land) be
appropriated from the Capital Fund for the purpose of making
improvements to Green Hill Park to replace the parks & recreational
facilities lost through this land transfer. Attached is a
prioritized listing of the improvements suggested by the Parks &
Recreation Department, estimated at $235,900 for this purpose.
These suggested improvements would include: fencing for the
completion of four ball fields, one new soccer field, one new
T -ball field, a maintenance center, a combination concession/
restroom/storage facility, playground aparatus, a picnic shelter,
security fencing, signage and landscaping. Based upon the bids
received to perform this work and the net proceeds available, staff
would propose to work from top towards the bottom of this list.
The Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission has been advised
of the recommendation and concurs with the priorities established
by the Parks & Recreation Department.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACT:
� 5
Alternative #1: Appropriate an amount not to exceed $230,000
from the net proceeds of the sale of ten acres land in the Glenvar
West section of Roanoke County to further develop Green Hill Park.
Alternative #2: Leave the proceeds in the Capital Fund for
further appropriation by the Board of Supervisors.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff :rec0mmends`Alternative,.#1 (appropriating up to. $230,0.00
for improvements at Green Hill Park).
Respectfully submitted, Approved by,
ohn M. ChamblisJr. Elmer C. odge
Assistant Administrator County Administrator
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/Steven No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) A. McGraw to approve Alt #1 Garrett x
Received ( ) Johnson Ahsnt
Referred ( ) McGraw X
To ( ) Nickens X
Robers X
Attachment
cc: File
John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator
Reta Busher, Director, Mangement & Budget
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Steve Carpenter, Director, Parks & Recreation
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
9-20-83 ` Steve McGraw: This is how we would use the funds from Shamrock
Park at Green Hill Park.
Elmer Hodge /� S
ROANOKE COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
GREEN HILL PARK DEVELOPMENT - PHASE II
I. EXISTING FENCING
Relocate Glenvar ballfield fencing to
Green Hill Park facilities (contract) ........ $ 3,600.00
Provide dugout fencing and player's
benches - four (4) existing Green
Hill Park ballfields .........................$ 3,800.00
III. OUTDOOR SOCCER FIELD (1) .......................$ 42,400.00
Professional services (design and
survey services) ...................$ 6,000.00
Construction (contract) ............ $ 30,000.00
Goals/Nets.........................$ 900.00
Associated parking (gravel base/
chip and seal) .....................$ 5,500.00
IV. T -BALL BASEBALL FIELD (1) (NO OUTFIELD
Professional services (design and
survey services) ...................$
Construction (contract) ............ $
Backstop/foul line/dugout fencing..$
FENCING).$ 39,400.00
5,600.00
28,000.00
5,800.00
V. PARK DISTRICT MAINTENANCE CENTER (1)............$
Building (prefab - force account)..$ 5,800.00
Access (gravel) ................:...$ 3,000.00
Compound fencing/gate..............$ 4,400.00
Compound base (gravel) .............$ 3,200.00
Electrical .........................$ 2,600.00
VI. PARK CONCESSION/RESTROOM/STORAGEFACILITY
(CONTRACT)......................................5
Professiional services - design .... $ 3,500.00
Construction - building (prefab) ... $ 34,000.00
Utilities - water well/electricity.$ 23,000.00
Restroom fixtures - installed ...... $ 10,000.00
19,000.00
70,500.00
VII. PLAYGROUND APPARATUS (WOOD FORM) ................$ 18,800.00
(PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION - CONTRACT)
VIII. PICNIC SHELTER (CONTRACT) .......................$ 22,600.00
Shelter - prefab (including
concrete base) 24' x 30' min ....... $ 15,100.00
Construction .......................$ 4,500.00
Picnic tables ......................$ 1,800.00
Grills/receptacles.................$ 1,200.00
IX. SPLIT RAIL SECURITY FENCING (2 -RAIL) ............ $ 11,000.00
X. PARK S:GNAGE/LANDSCAPING ........................$ 4,800.00
• $235,900.00