HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/19/1989 - Adopted Board Recordsi
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989
RESOLUTION 121989-1 OF APPRECIATION TO THE
CAVE SPRING JAYCEES FOR BEING NAMED
THE TOP CHAPTER IN THE STATE
WHEREAS, the Cave Spring Jaycees has been an active
volunteer group, providing many hours and funds to help meet the
needs of the Roanoke Valley in general, and Roanoke County in
particular; and
WHEREAS, the Cave spring Jaycees has been involved in
collecting over $60,000 worth of supplies for victims of Hurricane
Hugo, in sponsoring candidates' debates prior to the November
election, and assisting the County with its All America City
celebration; and
WHEREAS, during the upcoming Christmas season, the
Jaycees will provide Christmas presents for the Mental Health
Services Children's Center, for underprivileged children, and for
senior citizens at Southern Manor, as well as a Christmas party for
residents of the Burwell Home; and
WHEREAS, the Cave spring Jaycees has initiated innovative
methods to raise funds for year-round activities, including their
current gift -wrapping store at Tanglewood Mall; and
WHEREAS, the year-round activities of the Club include
sponsoring campers at Camp Virginia Jaycees, and providing funds
to the Muscular Dystrophy Association, St. Jude's Children's
Hospital and the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation; and
WHEREAS, the state organization, Virginia Jaycees,
reviewed the past activities and future plans of the Cave Spring
Jaycees, and awarded them the honor of being the top Jaycee
organization in the State.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors, on behalf of itself and all residents of the
Valley, does hereby extend its gratitude and appreciation to the
Cave Spring Jaycees for all that the members give to this
community; and
FURTHER, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does
hereby extend its congratulations to the Cave Spring Jaycees for
being named the top Chapter in the State.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
Brenda J. H61ton, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Resolutions of Appreciation File
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989
RESOLUTION 121989-2 OF APPRECIATION TO LEE GARRETT
FOR SERVICE AS A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
WHEREAS, Lee Garrett was elected to the Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors from the Windsor Hills Magisterial District
in 1985; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Garrett served with distinction on the Board
of Supervisors, helping to guide the County through a time of
growth and change; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Garrett was instrumental in the formation
of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission, and served as the Vice
Chairman of that Commission, giving Roanoke County a part in the
operation of the Regional Airport; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Garrett served as a member of the
negotiating team during consolidation discussions with the City of
Roanoke; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Garrett served two terms as Chairman of the
Board, during which time the County received statewide and national
recognition for various innovative programs; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Garrett was an essential member of the
County's All America City Award Team, leading the presentation and
helping the county to become the first in Virginia to receive that
award.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors, on behalf of itself and all citizens of
Roanoke County, do hereby extend their gratitude and appreciation
to LEE GARRETT for his outstanding contributions to the County as
a member of the Board of Supervisors; and
FURTHERMORE, the Board extends its deepest hopes that Mr.
Garrett continues his involvement with and concern for the citizens
of Roanoke County.
On motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by Supervisor
Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. Hol3ton, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Resolutions of Appreciation File
D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989
RESOLUTION 121989-3 OF APPRECIATION TO THE
INDIVIDUALS AND ORGANIZATIONS WHO
ASSISTED AT THE SHENANDOAH HOMES FIRE
WHEREAS, on Thursday, December 14, 1989, a fire at the
Shenandoah Homes retirement complex resulted in the tragic loss of
four lives and personal injury to both residents and those fighting
the fire; and
WHEREAS, many individuals and organizations set aside
their personal safety and comfort during the middle of a snowy,
sub -freezing night to assist those residents during this
devastating situation; and
WHEREAS, members of the Roanoke County Sheriff's Office
began the evacuation of the residents; and
WHEREAS, six fire companies and eight rescue squads
responded to the fire, performing in a heroic manner at all times;
and
WHEREAS, in the true spirit of regional cooperation,
neighboring localities offered their assistance by manning the
stations who responded to the fire and Roanoke City rescue squads
joined in the evacuation process; and
WHEREAS, the staff and residents of Shenandoah Homes
facilitated the efforts of the fire and rescue personnel using
their knowledge and skills learned in previous fire drills; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School System provided school
buses to transport the residents of the retirement home to an
emergency evacuation center; and
WHEREAS, Peggy and Raymond Setchel offered the use of the
Star City Roller Skating Center as an emergency evacuation shelter.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, wishes to express its
pride and admiration to those individuals and organizations for
their many efforts to aid the residents at the Shenandoah Homes
retirement complex; and
FURTHER, The Board, on behalf of the citizens of Roanoke
County, expresses its deepest appreciation for the heroic deeds
that were performed by so many with little thought to personal
comfort and safety.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Garrett, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
cc:
Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
None
A COPY TESTE:
A k 9, At-6�
Brenda J. Mlton, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
File
Resolutions of Appreciation File
Chief Tommy Fuqua, Fire & Rescue
Sheriff Michael Kavanaugh
od
A-121989-4
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Presentation of Roanoke County Audit for the Year
Ended June 30, 1989
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND: On September 12, 1989 the County staff presented
preliminary results of operations for the year ended June 30, 1989.
At this time, we would like to present the audited comprehensive
annual financial report for the County of Roanoke for the year
ended June 30, 1989. Peat Marwick Main & Co. performed the
independent audit and presented the County with a unqualified
opinion.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As a result of operations for the year
ended June 30, 1989, the County generated additional funds of
$2,996,225. As shown on the Table on page 3, $525,000 of this
amount was used in the 1989-90 budget, which leaves $2,471,225 as
an increase in the unappropriated balance. The preliminary report
on operations appropriated $2,026,000 to unappropriated fund
balance. This final report of operations will add an additional
$445,225 to unappropriated fund balance. This additional money is
the result of savings over anticipated expenditures and rollovers
at the time of the preliminary report.
This surplus can be attributed to revenues collected in excess
of the amount budgeted. The majority of these revenues were in the
area of real estate taxes ($920,451 in excess of budget) and
personal property taxes ($1,592,457 in excess of budget). Actual
expenditures were $454,142 under the amount that was budgeted,
which reflects our efforts to stay within the allocated budgets.
This makes our undesignated fund balance at June 30, 1989,
$4,483,543 or 7.52% of the general fund expenditures. This is an
excellent increase in our fund balance position, however it is
important to keep in mind that since June 30, 1989 the Board has
appropriated $286,980 of this reserve which presently leaves an
undesignated fund balance of $4,196,563.
In addition, the School Operating Fund had an excess of $381,133
for the year. Based upon an earlier understanding $150,000 will
be used to help offset the cost of employee health insurance
coverage. The remaining $231,133 will be appropriated to the
School Capital Fund.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends:
1) Accepting the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for
the County of Roanoke for the year ended June 30, 1989.
2) Appropriating the following amounts resulting from
1988-89 operations:
County General Fund -
Unappropriated Balance $445,225
School Operating Fund -
Employee Health Insurance 150,000
School Capital Fund -
Unappropriated Balance 231,133
3) Adopting a goal statement to maintain the General Fund
Unappropriated Balance at a minimum of 6.25% of 1989-90
General Fund expenditures, which is $3,948,000.
61-0�
Diane D. HyattP Elmer C. Hodge
Director of Finance County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------------
Approved ( x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred ( )
To
Motion by: Harry c- -.
Rtpyen _ MrGraw tn AQ • •
cc: File
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Don Myers, Assistant County Administrator
KA
Yes
Garrett x
Johnson x
McGraw x
Nickens x
Robers x
No Abs
County of Roanoke, Virginia
Results of Operations (Audited)
General Fund
For the Year Ended June 30, 1989
Revenues
Real Estate Taxes
Personal Property Taxes
Sales Tax
Meals Tax
All other revenue
Total revenues
Budget Actual variance
$ 25,780,009 $ 26,700,460 $ 920,451
10,200,000 11,792,457 1,592,457
4,390,492 4,141,633 (248,859)
1,500,000 1,475,402 (24,598)
16,384,875 16,446,854 61,979
58,255,376 60,556,806 2,301,430
Expenditures (including (60,224,998)
rollovers)
Use of Fund Balance and change 1,969,622
in Reserves
-0-
Previously appropriated:
Beginning balance for 1989-90 budget
(59,770,856) 454,142
2,210,275 240,653
2,996,225
(525,000)
Preliminary year end report (Sept. 12, 1989) (2,026,000)
$ 445,225
IMPACT ON UNDESIGNATED FUND BALANCE
Preliminary beginning balance at July 1, 1989
Final adjustment (per above)
Audited beginning balance at July 1, 1989
Board appropriations to date:
Dental insurance
Drainage projects
New Fund Balance at December 19, 1989
3
2,996,225
$ 4,038,318
445,225
4,483,543
(106,980)
(180,000)
$ 4,196,563
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
UNDESIGNATED FUND BALANCES
Undesignated Fund Balance at June 30, 1986
Undesignated Fund Balance at June 30, 1987
Undesignated Fund Balance at June 30, 1988
Undesignated Fund Balance at June 30, 1989
0
$ 1,584,637
$ 2,063,493
$ 3,037,141
$ 4,483,543
3.16%
3.87%
5.32%
7.52%
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
A-121989-5
-L/ a
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Request for authorization to execute a contract to
establish an automated library system with the
Cities of Roanoke and Salem.
BACKGROUND•
December 13, 1988
The board authorized staff to proceed through the bidding
process with the Cities of Roanoke and Salem to determine the
fiscal impact and feasibility of a Valleywide Library Automation
System.
June 27, 1989
A work session was held to update the Board on status of the
project. No action was requested at that time.
July 25 1989
The Board authorized the County to participate in the project.
Under the approved arrangement, the City of Roanoke would execute
a contract with the vendor, install the system, and front the cost
of the system. The County would use $60,000 from the Library
operating budge to cover the cost of converting the files,
installing the terminals and paying the City a down payment for our
share of the system. The balance of $300,000 would be repaid to
the City over the next three years at approximately $113,000
assuming bond rates 6.25%.
November 15, 1989
The Board delayed action on a request to authorize Mr. Hodge
to execute the contract with the City to allow staff to study the
agreement and gather further information.
December 4, 1989
Roanoke City Council authorized the execution of a contract
with the vendor contingent on participation by the County.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION
Staff has negotiated a contract with the representatives of
the Cities of Roanoke and Salem which is substantially in accord
with the July 25, 1989, Board action. However, several of the
financial terms have changed over the past three and one-half
months. These changes are as follows:
1. The cost estimates initially submitted to the Board (see
Attachment A) have been revised (see Appendix B of the
Contract).
2. The County shall pay the City of Roanoke $68,362 during
this fiscal year (see Section 16 (a) of Contract).
3. The interest rate for repayments is 8.75% (see Section
16 (a) of the Contract).
4. The County shall repay the City of Roanoke $100,000 on
or before July 1, 1990; $117,500 on or before July 1,
1991; and $108,750 on or before July 1, 1992.
5. The County's share of the current contract is $4,388 less
than the estimate initially submitted to the Board.
The contract and Appendices A, B and C are attached to this
report.
In considering this request, several key points should be
noted:
o Selection of hardware and software for the system was
made by the Library Automation Committee consisting of
representatives of Roanoke County and the Cities of
Roanoke and Salem. Selection was made based on an
extensive list of criteria. The winning system was the
unanimous choice of the participants.
o Six vendors responded to the Invitation for Bids. Of the
six, four failed to fully meet the specifications. Of the
two vendors who did meet the specs, DRA and Dynix, the
five-year cost for DRA was $32,195 less than for Dynix.
Neither DRA nor Dynix are available for use on City ( IBM)
or County (HP) hardware.
o Although less expensive alternatives were available and
were considered, price was only one of an extensive list
of features compared. The committee made it's selection
based on a comparison all these features.
o Staff feels it would be impossible to convince the other
parties to reconsider their selection at this stage of
the process.
17-;�
o The benefits of a joint approach far exceed those of
individually implemented systems.
o The terms and price of participation in the joint
approach are probably much better now than they would be
in the future.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS:
1. Authorize the County Administrator to execute this
contract on behalf of the County of Roanoke.
a. $300,000 of County share to be financed by the City
of Roanoke.
b. County to pay for its share from funds identified
during the audit for fiscal year ending June 30,
1989.
2. Do not authorize the County Administrator to execute this
contract on behalf of the County of Roanoke.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board authorize the County Ad-
ministrator to execute this contract on behalf of the County of
Roanoke.
Approved (x )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Respectfully submitted,
/�J�
Elmer C. lfodge4
County Administrator
ACTION
Motion by: Steven McGraw/
-- Garrett to approve Alt
1.b, amended hy Harry C.
.m ...
b nc-e
cc: File balance
John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
George Garretson, Director, Libraries
VOTE
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
No
Yes Abs
x
This CONTRACT, made and entered into this day of
, 19 , between the CITY OF ROANOKE, a municipal
corporation chartered under the laws of the Commonwealth of
Virginia, CITY OF SALEM, a municipal corporation chartered under
the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and the COUNTY OF
ROANOKE, a county chartered under the laws of the Commonwealth of
Virginia.
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Contract is to establish an
integrated automated library system, and an integrated automated
library system, (hereinafter referred to as "system") is an
online, real-time computer system designed around a bibliographic
database of MARC (machine readable cataloging) standard records
for all types of library materials capable in design architecture
and performance capacity of supporting multiple library acquisi-
tions, cataloging, fiscal control, online public catalog, cir-
culation control and management information applications; and
WHEREAS, this Contract shall provide a mechanism for allo-
cating and sharing costs for the integrated automated library
system; and
WHEREAS, $42.1-34 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended,
authorizes any city or county to enter into a contract with any
adjacent city or county to receive or to provide library service
on such terms and conditions as shall be mutually agreeable; and
WHEREAS, recent studies have shown that the libraries of the
three jurisdictions need to make a change of basic technology by
having the manual systems and records replaced by a computer-
D-o2�
based information system which will facilitate library operations
and improve library services; and
WHEREAS, by this Contract the parties intend to implement and
effectuate a library automation system to expand and improve
library services to the citizens of the three participating
jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, the library automation system is a joint undertaking
by political subdivisions, pursuant to $15.1-21 of the Code of
Virginia (1950), as amended, in furtherance of a proper govern-
mental function; and
WHEREAS, the parties to this Contract wish to establish the
terms and conditions whereby the cost for the system shall be
allocated among the parties in accordance with a prescribed for-
mula; and
WHEREAS, the parties have established an Advisory Committee
to be responsible for making key decisions and setting policy for
use of the system by all participating libraries; and
WHEREAS, the parties have established a Library Automation
Committee to manage the system during implementation and opera-
tion, to develop policy and budgets, and to report to the Advi-
sory Committee and administrations of the cities and county; and
WHEREAS, the Library Automation Committee shall be assisted
and advised by Library staff and administrative officials from
each governing body.
THEREFORE, FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants,
agreements, obligations, and undertakings herein contained, the
parties hereby covenant and agree, each with the others, as
follows:
2 -
1. The City of Roanoke, City of Salem and County of Roanoke
shall implement an integrated automated library system as mutually
agreed upon by the City Council for the City of Roanoke, City
Council for the City of Salem, and the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County.
2. The type of system to be acquired by the parties will
perform library data handling functions as agreed upon by the
Library Automation Committee.
3. The membership of the Advisory Committee shall consist
of the City of Roanoke Director of Human Resources, the County of
Roanoke Assistant Administrator for Human Services, the City of
Salem Assistant City Manager, a representative from the Library
Boards of the City of Roanoke and the County of Roanoke, the City
of Roanoke Librarian, Directors of the City of Salem Public
Library, and County of Roanoke Public Library.
4. The membership of the Library Automation Committee shall
consist of the City of Roanoke Librarian,•and Directors of the
City of Salem Public Library and County of Roanoke Public
Library, the data processing managers of the Cities of Roanoke
and Salem, and County of Roanoke, and the Automation Coordinator
who shall be a library employee in the classified service of the
City of Roanoke.
5. All public libraries of the parties to this agreement
(hereinafter referred to as "participating libraries") shall abide
by the policies and procedures established by the Library
Automation Committee for the operation of the system.
6. The City of Roanoke shall provide space, at no cost to
participating libraries, to house the central site components of
- 3 -
the system, such space hereinafter referred to as Central Host
Site. Central site components shall consist of the products set
forth in Appendix D, which is attached hereto and made a part of
this agreement.
?. The parties shall jointly own the Central Host Site com-
ponents and telecommunications equipment purchased for the system
under the terms of this agreement and apportioned as shared costs
in accordance with the percentages as set forth in Appendix A,
attached herewith and made a part of this agreement.
8. Each participating library shall be responsible for all
costs involved in the creation and transfer of their own biblio-
graphic records to the shared system database. All participating
libraries will input, maintain and share these records according to
the procedures developed by the Library Automation Committee. Each
participating library will be responsible for establishing, main-
taining and bearing the cost for acquiring these records from their
own source. -
9. All records entered into the system by each participa-
ting library or supplied by or for each participating library are
and shall remain the property of each participating library.
Each participating library agrees to share its bibliographic,
authority, item, holdings, patron, and loan records with other par-
ticipating libraries in accordance with policies, procedures, proto-
cols and regulations established by the Library Automation
Committee. The addition, use, and removal of these records shall be
governed by the policies and procedures of the Library Automation
Committee.
- 4 -
r-
10. The contract shall be for a term of three years from the
date hereof.
11. Upon the expiration of the initial term of three (3) years
this Contract shall be automatically renewed annually for one year
terms unless notice of termination is given by any party in writing
to the other parties at least twelve (12) months prior to the end of
the original term of the contract or twelve (12) months prior to the
end of any one year term of renewal. Notice of termination by
either of the cities or the county, given as hereinabove provided,
shall constitute termination of this contract only to the termina-
ting party upon the effective date of such notice of termination,
which effective date shall not be sooner than the last day of the
original three-year term or the last day of any one year term of
renewal. The terminating party shall forfeit any equity in the
system to the remaining libraries participating in the system upon
proper notice of termination.
12. The total system capital and start up costs herein agreed
and as set forth in detail in Appendix B, attached herewith and made
a part of this agreement, shall be in an amount not to exceed
$973,949.00. The total cost for maintenance and operation of the
system is estimated to be $120,000.00 (in 1989 dollars) for the
first full year of operation, as set forth in detail in Appendix C,
attached hereto and made a part of this agreement; and for each year
thereafter the total cost for maintenance and operation shall be an
amount based on the actual operating costs and charges as determined
by the Library Automation Committee.
- 5 -
(a) Each jurisdiction's costs for the shared components of the
automation system, including annual operating costs, shall be based
on shared costs percentages as set forth in Appendix A. The percen-
tages shall be adjusted on an annual basis following the initial
term of this contract.
(b) Upon the renewal of this contract, the percentages will be
reevaluated by the Library Automation Committee in order to reflect
any changes in the usage of the system occurring on the part of any
participating library covered by this agreement. For the initial
term of this contract, the parties' shared costs as set forth in
Appendix A will be as follows:
(1) Fifty percent (50%) of the purchase price and
start-up costs and system maintenance, operations
and telecommunications costs shall be paid by the
City of Roanoke during the term of the contract.
(2) Forty-two percent (42%) of the purchase price and
start-up costs of the system and system main-
tenance, operations and telecommunications costs
shall be paid by the County of Roanoke during the
term of the contract.
(3) Eight percent (8%) of the purchase price start-up
costs, and system maintenance, operations and tele-
communications costs shall be paid by the City of
Salem during the term of the contract.
13. The City of Roanoke shall act as the purchasing agent for
all components of the system.
14. The City of Roanoke shall comply with the provisions of
Chapter 23.1 of the Code of the City of Roanoke (1979), as amended,
which is in accordance with the Virginia Procurement Act, Chapter 7
of Title 11 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, in the pro-
curement of all components of the system.
15. The parties agree that the City of Roanoke, as purchasing
agent, shall be reimbursed in full for its payment of all indivi-
dual library costs and expenditures for operation and services in
each jurisdiction's participating libraries. This will include
payments for purchase of terminals, printers, light pens, modems,
barcode labels, machine readable labels for patron identification
cards, and database processing by system vendor as set forth in
Appendix A. The City of Roanoke, as purchasing agent, shall make
periodic billings to the City of Salem and County of Roanoke, no
more frequently than monthly.
16. The parties agree to pay as billed their proportionate
share of the cost for the system, not to exceed the following
amounts which are accurately set out in detail in Appendix B:
City of Roanoke - $ 527,305
County of Roanoke - $ 368,362
City of Salem - $ 78,282
(a) The County of Roanoke agrees that in consideration of the
continuing library services rendered to County residents by the City
of Roanoke, and conditioned upon the continued rendering of such
services, the County shall pay to the City of Roanoke $68,362.00
during this fiscal year (on or before June 30, 1990) as partial
payment for its proportionate share of the cost of the system. The
balance of the County's proportionate share of the cost of the
system ($300,000) shall be paid in full by the City of Roanoke. The
County shall thereafter repay the City of Roanoke in installments of
$100,000 per year for a period of three years at 8.75% interest per
annum on the remaining balance.
(b) Specifically, the County of Roanoke agrees to repay the
City of Roanoke as follows:
- 7 -
it Ivo, o o v pyk
(1) Payment in the amount of shall be paid to the
City of Roanoke on or before July 1, 1990;
(2) Payment in the amount of $117,500 shall be paid to the
City of Roanoke on or before July 1, 1991;
(3) Payment in the amount of $108,750 shall be paid to the
City of Roanoke on or before July 1, 1992.
(c) The obligations of the County under subparagraph (b) shall
be subject to and dependent upon appropriations being made from time
to time by the Board of Supervisors of the County for such purpose.
The County Administrator or other officer charged with the respon-
sibility for preparing the County's budget shall include in the pro-
posed budget for each fiscal year all amounts referred to be paid
under this contract during such fiscal year, and the County admin-
istrator or other such officer of the county shall use his best
efforts to obtain the annual appropriation throughout the term of
this contract.
(d) The County reasonably believes that funds sufficient to
make all payments required to be made by the county during the term
of the contract can be obtained from County revenue sources and
intends to make annual appropriations during the term of this
agreement sufficient to make such payments.
(e) If the County shall fail to repay the City of Roanoke for
its payment of the County's proportionate share of the cost as
herein agreed, the County shall forfeit any and all services, title,
interest, equity and claim to the system.
(f) All payments made under this agreement shall be accounted
��
for pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles for politi-
cal subdivisions.
17. The City of Roanoke shall make periodic billings to the
City of Salem and County of Roanoke for their proportionate share of
the cost of maintenance and operation, no more frequently than
monthly.
18. Any additional interested parties may be considered for
participation in the system by making application to the Library
Automation Committee. Upon recommendation of the Library Automation
Committee to the Advisory Committee and approval of the participat-
ing governing bodies, the contract may be amended to allow alloca-
tion costs and participation in the system by interested parties.
19. All participating libraries are bound by the terms of ven-
dor contract, which is attached hereto as Appendix D, for perfor-
mance and proper use of system.
20. The use of any growth capacity must be approved by the
Library Automation Committee.
21. This Contract and the attachments hereto, which are
incorporated by reference, constitute the entire contract between
the parties and supersedes all prior negotiations, represen-
tations or agreements, either oral or written.
22. This Contract may be amended by a written amendment or
modification hereto authorized by resolutions of the City Council
for the City of Roanoke, the City Council for the City of Salem,
and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke.
23. This agreement shall be governed by the laws of the
Commonwealth of Virginia.
I- a
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, each duly authorized
have hereunto affixed their signatures and seals to this
agreement, executed in triplicate as of the day of
. 1989.
ATTEST:
Mary F. Parker, City Clerk
(SEAL)
ATTEST'
—9 1/.
(SEAL)
ATTEST:
Uity cler
Mary Allen, Clerk of the Board
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Counsel, City of Roanoke
APPROVED AS TO FORM
.4�CG )77::ry�
Uo-unslel, City o alem
APPROVED AS TO FORM
'�
Counsel, County of Roan ke
CITY OF ROANOKE
By
W. Robert Herbert
City Manager
CITY OF SALEM
COUNTY OF ROANOKE
By .
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
- 10 -
Appendix A
m
Funding for the initial purchase and ongoing support of the
Roanoke Area Public Libraries Automation Project Will be in three
(3) forms: (1) shared costs based on the use of the agreed upon
percentages; (2) individual library costs based on use which Will
be reimbursed to the City of Roanoke as purchasing agent for the
automated system; and (3) individual jurisdiction costs which are
incurred and paid by each jurisdiction independently of this
agreement.
Shared Costs:
1. Purchase of central computer equipment and software
2. Preparation of computer host site
3. Installation of telecommunications network
4. Conversion of patron ID machine readable file
5. Monthly hardware maintenance costs for central site
6. Monthly telecommunication circuits costs
7. Monthly personnel costs for operation of system, speci-
fically an Automation Coordinator and system support
staff
8. Telecommunications equipment at the Central Host Site
9. Monthly software maintenance costs
10. Supplies necessary for operation at the Central Host Site
11. All costs for equipment insurance, i.e., theft,
casualty, fire, etc.
12. Any other costs agreed upon by the Library Automation
Committee
Individual Library Costs:
1. Purchase of smart machine readable barcode labels
2. Machine readable labels for patron ID cards
3. Terminals, printers, light pens, modems and other
peripheral equipment located within individual library
buildings
Individual Jurisdiction Costs:
1. Preparation of sites for terminals in individual
libraries
2. Labor for bar code labeling materials
3. Machine readable bibliographic data
The funding formula used for this project is based on the
following four statistical measures: 50% circulation; 30%
number of circulating points; 10% number of titles in the data
base; and 10% number of terminals within each library.
The result of these statistical measures is an equitable
breakdown of the shared costs as follows: City of Roanoke - 50%;
County of Roanoke - 42%; and City of Salem - 8%.
ACTION NO. A-121989-6
ITEM NO. %2)-3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to proceed with eminent domain for a
sanitary sewer easement
COUNTY ADMMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
JU
BACKGROUND:
The design for the Valleypointe Phase II sanitary sewer is
complete and easement acquisition is underway. Agreement has been
reached on all but one easement.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Staff has discussed the acquisition of a 1,032 foot sanitary
sewer easement with Mr. Jesse N. Jones for the past two months.
Our offer to pay 40% of the full assessed evaluation for this
easement has been declined. Mr. Jones is asking ten times that
amount. The requested easement is adjacent to a stream that runs
through Mr. Jones property.
In order to have timely construction of this project, staff
requests the Board of Supervisors authorize acquisition of this
easement by eminent domain proceeding. Staff will continue to
negotiate with the property owner to obtain the easement at a fair
value.
The other property owners have agreed to accept our offer of
40% assessed value for the sewer easement required for the project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Board authorize the County Attorney to
begin eminent domain proceedings to obtain the sanitary sewer
easement from Mr. Jones.
Respectfully submitted,
Cliffo D. Craig
Utility Director
App: 14)
Elmer C. Hodg
County Administrator
Approved
Denied
Received
Referred
to
Action
(x) Motion by :.. .•. .•
Harry r- Ninkpns to approve
staff rprnmmenrlation
cc: File
Paul Mahoney,
Cliff Craig,
County Attorney
Director, Utilities
Z)-3
Vote
No Yes Abs
Garrett x
Johnson x
McGraw Abstain
Nickens x
Robers x
A-121989-7
Item No. Z - Al
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY,
MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989
SUBJECT: Public Private Participation Agreement with Hansteck,
Inc.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND: 140
!J
Hansteck, Inc. is relocating their paint roller manufacturing
business from the City of Roanoke to a vacant building on Starkey
Road. Their relocation will result in $250,000 of improvements to
the building, the relocation of $475,000 of capital equipment, and
52 employees. A further increase of up to 25 employees will result
form the relocation. Hansteck has requested that Roanoke County
fund the water and sewer utility connection fees and the sewer
lateral location as local participation for their relocation and
expansion.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Utility Director estimates that fees and connection will cost
$7,250. The participation formula is as follows:
Estimated real estate taxes on improving building $7,475.00
Estimated machinery and tools tax 3,562.50
$11,037.50
Current tax value of structure -3,098.10
Net tax increase with relocation
$7,939.40
The relocation costs of $7,250 will then be met within the first
tax year.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds for the participation agreement are available in the Economic
Development Fund.
I
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the
appropriation and transfer of $7,250 from the Economic Development
Fund to the Utility Fund.
SUBMITTED BY:
""V w.
Timothy W. Guba a, Director
Economic Development
APPROVED:
2� k'',
Elmer C. Hodge, Jr.,
County Administrator
-------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION No Yes Abs
Approved (X) Motion by: Harry C. NickPns/ Garrett _x
Denied ( ) Bob L. Johnson Johnson _x
Received ( ) McGraw _x
Referred Nickens x
to Robers x_
cc: File
Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
ACTION NO. A-121989-8
ITEM NO. 1 --.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Request for authorization to execute an agreement
with Botetourt County for a joint Fire and Rescue
Station, to acquire land and proceed with design
and construction of the facility.
BACKGROUND•
Since August 1989, county staff has been working with the City
of Roanoke to develop an agreement for the operation of a joint
station in the 460 east area. The facility would serve the needs
of the Bonsack area citizens and also provide protection for the
eastern part of the City.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
After an update at our November meeting the Board instructed
staff to bring back a decision on direction for this project in
December. Since then we have continued our discussions with the
City but have also met with Botetourt County to consider locations
and the possibility of a working agreement with them for a joint
station.
It appears that we have reached tentative agreement with
Botetourt County to move ahead. The only remaining question is the
exact location of the facility, and that can be determined within
a few days since the alternatives have been narrowed to three.
In an effort to remain responsive to the City's need for a 5 -
minute response time we have conducted some trial runs from the
Vinton Station into the 460 East area of the City. The results
have been positive and it appears the 5 -minute response time
requirement could be met from that station. This alternative is
not only viable but probably the best from an overall standpoint.
It would save the City approximately $450,000 in land, building and
equipment costs and is a plan which could be implemented very
quickly. We stand ready to work with Mr. Herbert on a joint
arrangement with Vinton if that is his desire.
In the meantime, I feel we should proceed wit4 a working
agreement with Botetourt County, to acquire land and begin
construction of a station within a 1 -mile radius of the 460/604
intersection.
'D� 5
We anticipate an increase in cost due in part to inflation
and to expenses involved with adding space for Emergency Medical
Services which were not part of the original plan. The facility
will be similar to the new Back Creek Station and construction
could begin in the Spring of 1990, with completion set for that
Fall. Community interest in the volunteer program, especially
Emergency Medical Services, has been good and the Fire and Rescue
Department is now developing a recruitment plan.
The station will be a 24 hour volunteer operation, with the
possibility of additional daylight career staffing in this station
or in the Vinton station to provide back-up support if necessary.
FISCAL IMPACT•
The cost of the building, for reasons noted above, will be
approximately $75,000 more than the bond proceeds. Once bids are
received we will request the appropriation of the necessary funds
to proceed. Shown below is a projection of costs:
Building $375,000
Land (If not constructed at Library site) 20,000
Ambulance and Equipment 100,000
2 Paid Paramedic Firefighters (optional) 55,000 (annual)
Annual Operating Expense for Rescue 10,000
Note: A refurbished, fully equipped pumper and a brush
truck will be provided for the station with existing
budget funds.
The above figures will be reduced by the amount of
any contribution from Botetourt County.
RECOMMENDATION•
It is recommended that the Board authorize staff to proceed
with the preparation of a working agreement with Botetourt County,
the acquisition of land and the design and construction of the
building.
APPROVED:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
ACTION
Approved (X ) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/
Denied ( ) Harry C. Nickens
Received
Referred
to
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Tommy Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Garrett x
Johnson x
McGraw x
Nickens x
Robers x
A-121989-9
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. V
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: 1990 Legislative Program, Virginia General Assembly
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: �iJC.I
BACKGROUND:
On June 27, 1989 The Board of Supervisors recommended that the
Virginia Association of Counties consider several issues for
priority action by the Virginia General Assembly in its 1990
legislative session. Roanoke County called for the development
of a comprehensive statewide initiative to address the problems of
solid waste management (including a ban on non -biodegradable
plastic and styrofoam containers and packaging, deposits for
disposable beverage containers, repeal of Section 10.1-1425 which
preempts any local ordinance regulating containers or packaging or
requiring a deposit, authorizing a preference for recycled goods
under the procurement act, funding for regional cooperative
agreements and recycling programs, and more stringent statewide
enforcement of illegal dumping) and one-half cent local option
sales tax.
On November 14, 1989 VACO approved a series of legislative
proposals which included the issues recommended by the County.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Since June 27, 1989 several other issues have come to the
attention of the Board or staff which merit consideration for
legislative action. These issues include:
• legislation to address the funding and timing issues
arising from the referendum approving the creation of a
police department;
• the funding of the construction of the Regional Forensic
Science Laboratory;
• proposals by the Roanoke County School Board;
• endorsement of the VACo/VML Intergovernmental Relations
Task Force;
opposition to restrictions on real estate taxes or
assessments, and to limitations on "downzoning"; and
• support for equal taxing and borrowing authority.
The recommended legislative program has been revised to
reflect Supervisor's comments and suggestions from the November 28,
1989, Board meeting.
Legislative recommendations to implement
between Roanoke County and Roanoke City will be
Board at the conclusion of the negotiations
workshops.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS:
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
any consolidation
submitted to the
and the citizen
Staff recommends that the Board endorse and adopt the attached
1990 Legislative Program for Roanoke County.
Respectfully submitted,
1
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
Action
Approved (X) Motion by Rnh T._ .TnhnGnn/Steven Garrett
Denied ( ) _A_ McGraw to remove two Gchnol Johnson
Received ( ) requests (1 ) 1 /1 cent local McGraw
Referred optinn ca1ei4 tax for edunation Nickens
to (2) np,=nce cmmp1i1Gnry hindinq Robers
arhitratinn for school Pmn1n)-?s
Harry C. Nickens/Steven A. McGraw
to approve as amended - URC
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Vote
No Yes Abs
x
1990 LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM 11/20/89
Police Department: legislation to address funding and timing issues arising from referendum approval.
Support for State funding of the construction of a Regional Forensic Science Laboratory (Virginia
Department of General Services, Division of Consolidated Laboratories)
Support for the agreement of the VACO/VML Intergovernmental Relations Task Force and the
recommendations of the Commission on Local Government Structures and Relationships
Comprehensive Statewide Initiative to address the problem of Solid Waste Management and to encourage
recycling
Authorization for a one-half cent local option sales tax; equal taxing and borrowing authority.
School Board Legislative Requests
-Funding
•Include enrollment loss funding in Virginia Board of Education's 1990-92 budget
-Fund needed local capital improvements from statewide lottery proceeds.
•Include drop-out prevention funding in State budget and provide for an equitable method
of distribution of these funds to benefit all local school divisions.
•e1�sO��c�srnp�at9->�rdhzg-�'>sim�ttan-fafgutsiizr �chaai-empiay��-(�I1R 278j-
-Local option to determine the opening date of schools
-Legislation to clarify the religious exemption statute
-Amend Section 46.2-873 to authorize localities to determine timing needs for school zone
signalization
Opposition to statewide ceiling on real estate tax increases or assessments, and to restrictions on a
locality's ability to "downzone" land
ACTION # A-121989-10
ITEM NUMBER TJ -
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Additional Drainage Engineer for the Engineering
Department `J
p �J
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS;
•�c�' 4' !i 5 00
6� /
BACKGROUND
Roads and Drainage Activities were shifted from the
Department of Public Facilities to the Engineering Department in
early 1987. These two activities were handled by one engineer
and assumed the individual would spend approximately 50% of his
time on drainage and 50% of his time on roadway matters. This
engineering position was added in June, 1986 to address road
concerns, particularly the 1985 Road Bond, and also the start of
the Drainage Program in Roanoke County. The work load involved
the design and preparation of documents for approximately $1
million of road projects, and $200,000 of drainage projects.
During each of the following years $200,000 has been allocated
toward drainage projects and $106,000 allocated toward Rural
Addition Road Projects. At the November 28, 1989, meeting the
Board of Supervisors approved additional funding in the amount of
$180,000 for drainage projects P-31 through P-55.
During Fiscal Year 88-89 the Engineering Department kept
time records for the various activities. During that year the
personnel cost for drainage matters was approximately $28,000 and
for road matters was approximately $18,500, which represents
approximately 1-1/2 man years. Even with the additional time
spent on these activities the Engineering Department was not able
to complete the backlog of road matters, and the additional
effort was to the detriment of other activities such as plan
review, other County Projects, and developing systematic
procedures, and files within the department.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION
Road and Drainage Projects have a very high public
perception, require considerable more staff time to develop the
project, and provide the necessary public information to the
concerned citizenry. Drainage problems have to be reviewed not
only for the current conditions but the potential for future
aggravation of the problem due to upstream development, and the
difficulties associated with working in developed areas of the
neighborhood. Tremendous time is spent in working out individual
construction details through the private property, the
consideration of trees, buildings and other features which
restrict access for construction equipment, and special items
that have significance to the various property owners.
Historically, engineering costs range from 4 to 10%,
depending on the size of the project. As an example: a project
cost of $1 million may have a projected engineering cost of 5%,
whereas a project cost of $30,000 may have an engineering cost of
10% or more. When you consider the relative size of the drainage
and roadway projects, you would anticipate the engineering cost
to be in the 8 to 10% range. In addition, the time spent for
community meeting, individual contacts, the preparation of
various permanent, and construction easements, and the
construction supervision involved in maintaining the delicate
balance between project scope and the property owners right,
tends to make the engineering and construction supervision cost
significantly higher than the typical project.
In summary the engineering, easement acquisition and
construction administration for $380,000 worth of Drainage
Projects, $106,000 of Rural Addition Projects, and the remaining
1985 Road Bond Projects, require that a minimum of two
engineering personnel be assigned to these activities, for these
projects to be handled on a reasonable timeframe and projected
schedule.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS
Alternative No. 1: Approve the addition of an additional
Drainage Engineer for the Engineering Department at an estimated
cost of $35,000 per year. This additional position will allow
the Engineering Department to proceed with the current Drainage
Maintenance Priority list and the Rural Addition Road Projects on
a timely basis. Funds for this additional position should come
from the General Funds unappropriated balance.
Alternative No. 2: Not approve the addition of the Drainage
Engineer for the Engineering Department. Based on current work
2
KbRi
load, it will not be possible to complete the Drainage
Maintenance Priority list, Rural Addition Roads, and other
activities on a reasonable schedule. Priorities would have to be
established for the Engineering Department for the various work
and certain projects may be delayed.
Alternative No. 3: Not approve the addition of the drainage
engineer for the Engineering Department. Contract with outside
engineering firms for some activities (plan review, roads,
drainage) using allocated funds. Possible delays and additional
cost may be associated with this alternative.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1, and request Board of
Supervisors approval for an additional Drainage Engineer, for
the Engineering Department.
SUBMITTED BY:
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
cc: File
ACTION
Motion by: Harry C.
Steven A. McGraw to
Alt. #1
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
Nickens/
approveGarrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
VOTE
No Yes Abs
x
X
x
x
x
Phillip T.
Henry, P.E.
Director of
Engi Bering
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
cc: File
ACTION
Motion by: Harry C.
Steven A. McGraw to
Alt. #1
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
Nickens/
approveGarrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
VOTE
No Yes Abs
x
X
x
x
x
ACTION #
A-121989-11
ITEM NUMBER +D -
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Bushdale-Road Authorization to Acquire Right of Way
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:loll
�.,.�
BACKGROUND
Bushdale Road has been placed on the Rural Addition Priority
List for upgrade of the roadway for future State maintenance.
Staff has reviewed several alternatives, and believes that the
most feasible alternative is to provide a relocated alignment of
Bushdale Road to intersect at Mayfield Drive, as shown on the
attached map.
Bushdale Road has been on the Rural Addition list for
several years and is the oldest project that hasn't been
addressed either through Rural Addition or 1985 Road Bond.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION
Bushdale Road is a private roadway along a 17 foot private
road easement. Bushdale Road at its intersection with Mayfield
Drive is bordered on both sides by residences. The location of
these houses make it virtually impossible to provide the minimum
40 foot right-of-way required for a state maintained road. Also,
there is inadequate sight distance at this intersection location.
Therefore, due to these constraints the alignment of Bushdale
Road at Mayfield Drive will have to be relocated to reduce the
damage to the private residences and to have sufficient sight
distance at Mayfield Drive intersection.
Based on previous discussions with the affected property
owners, it is very likely that the acquisition of right-of-way
will require financial payment, and in some cases may require
condemnation to acquire the property. The following is a list of
property owners who will be affected by the right-of-way
acquisition, and a projected cost associated with the right-of-
way acquisition.
Property
Estimated
Identification #
Property Owner
Right -of -Way Cost
79.03-5-79
M/M George W. Cyphers
8000
79.03-5-80
Mary V. Bush
3000
79.03-5-81
Mamie Webster
-
79.03-5-82
M/M Jack E. Glover
-
79.03-5-83
M/M Jack E. Glover
-
79.03-5-85
Bonnie Dean
-
79.03-5-87
M/M Samuel A. Smith
-
79.03-5-88
M/M Thomas A. Poff
-
79.03-5-89
M/M Charles Poff
-
79.-03-5-68.2
M/M Charles Poff
-
70.03-4-29
M/M Harold D. Kelly
-
79.03-4-30
Rachel H. Arthur
-
79.03-4-31
M/M Ronald D. Wood
-
79.03-4-32
Lelia B. Draper
-
79.03-4-40
M/M Robert W. Martin
1000
79.03-4-39
M/M Robert W. Martin
-
79.03-4-38
M/M Donald L. Draper
2000
79.03-4-37
M/M Donald L. Draper
1000
15000
2
n
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS
Alternative Number 1: Approve the acquisition of right-of-
way necessary for the upgrade of Bushdale Road to Secondary Road
Standards. This alternative will involve relocation of a portion
of Bushdale Road, and will require the purchase of some road
right-of-way. While the road construction is provided by VDOT
through Rural Addition Funds, the cost associated with
engineering and right-of-way acquisition are funded by Roanoke
County. Therefore, funds in an estimated amount $15,000 should
be appropriated from the General Fund Unappropriated Balance to
proceed with right-of-way acquisition.
Alternative Number 2: Delete Bushdale Road from the Rural
Addition List, due to cost and concerns involved in acquisition
of right-of-way. Previously Roanoke County has assumed the
position that the property owners should dedicate right-of-way at
no cost to Roanoke County for upgrade of private roads to
Secondary Road Standards.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends Alternative Number 1, whereby, the Board of
Supervisors would authorize acquisition of right-of-way as
necessary for the upgrade of Bushdale Road to Secondary Road
Standards, appropriate funds for the acquisition of this right-
of-way, and authorize the staff to proceed with necessary right-
of-way acquisition. In the event that condemnation would be
required for right-of-way acquisition, these actions would be
brought back for Board direction.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY:
OKI Z4 4
Phillip T. Henry, E. Elmer C. Hodg
Director of Engine ring County Administrator
------------------------------------------------------------
Approved
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
ACTION
Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/
Strum A. Mnaraw to apprnv&;arrett
Alt- #1 Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Reta Busher, Director, Management 3& Budget
VOTE
No Yes Abs
x
�-g
Q
NORTH
GUMMUNITT SERVICES '"------- -"a" """""144M`ivu lu
ANDDEVELOPMENT Acquire Right -Of -flay
A-121989-12
Item No. Q___9
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY,
MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989
SUBJECT: Public -Private Partnership Agreement with Ingersoll-
Rand
COUNTY ADMINISTRATORIS COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
Ingersoll-Rand is locating their new roof -bolt division on five
acres in the Glenvar area of the County. Their location will
result in $2,300,000 of improvements and 20 employees with a total
annual payroll of $400,000. During the fifth year of business,
Ingersoll-Rand projects that 30 additional employees will be hired
and a building addition of 35,000 square feet will be constructed.
Ingersoll-Rand has requested that Roanoke County fund the water
and sewer utility connection fees as local participation for this
new division. Water line extension will be requested through the
Utility Department.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Utility Director estimates that water and sewer connection fees
will be $33,763.
Value Tax Revenue
Real estate $1,265,000 $14,548
Machinery & tools $1,091,000 $ 8,182
Total revenue x,730
The costs associated with this request will be repaid in one and
one-half years.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds for this request are available in the Economic Development
Fund.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the
appropriation and transfer of $33,763 from the Economic Development
Fund to the Utility Department.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED:
Timothk W. Guba a, Director Elmer C. Hodge, Jr.,
Economic Development County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION No Yes Abs
Approved ( :4 Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/ Garrett x
Denied ( ) Lee Garrett Johnsonx
Received ( ) McGraw AS -lain
Referred Nickens Abstain
to Robers x
cc: File
Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989
ORDINANCE 121989-13 REPEALING ORDINANCE 83-
174 AND ADOPTING A NEW ORDINANCE REQUIRING THE
FILING OF A DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF ECONOMIC
INTERESTS AND OTHER SPECIFIED INFORMATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.1-639.14 OF THE CODE OF
VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, on September 27, 1983, the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Ordinance No. 83-174 requiring
disclosure of personal and financial interests of certain County
officers, officials, and employees pursuant to the provisions of
the Comprehensive Conflict of Interests Act; and
WHEREAS, said Act was repealed by the 1987 Virginia General
Assembly which enacted the State and Local Government Conflict of
Interests Act; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance repeals and reenacts Ordinance No. 83-
174 and adopts a new ordinance to conform with the revised State
Code; and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
November 28, 1989, and the second reading of this ordinance was
held on December 19, 1989.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, that Ordinance No. 83-174 is hereby repealed. Further,
a new ordinance requiring the filing of a disclosure statement of
economic interests and other specified information pursuant to
Section 2.1-639.14 of the Code of Virginia be adopted as follows:
1. That in addition to the members of the Board of
Supervisors and the Constitutional Officers of Roanoke County,
Virginia, the following persons occupying certain positions of
trust appointed by the Board of Supervisors and such other persons
employed by the County be, and they hereby are, designated and
directed to file as a condition to assuming office or employment
or continuing in such position to file a disclosure statement of
their personal interests and such other information as is specified
on the form set forth in Section 2.1-639.15 of the 1950 Code of
Virginia, as amended, and shall thereafter file such a statement
annually on or before January 15, to -wit:
County Administrator
County Attorney
Director of Economic Development
2. Nonsalaried citizen members of the following boards,
commissions, or authorities shall file, as a condition of assuming
office, a disclosure form of their personal interests, and such
other information as is specified on the form set forth in Section
2.1-639.15:1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and
thereafter shall file such form annually on or before January 15:
Members of the Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority
Members of the Roanoke County Library Board
Members of the Roanoke County Planning Commission
Members of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission (appointed by
the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia)
Members of the Roanoke County Resource Authority
3. In addition to any disclosure required by sub -sections
1 and 2 of this ordinance, members of the Planning Commission,
Board of Zoning Appeals, real estate assessors, and the County
Administrator shall make annual disclosures of all their interests
in real estate located in Roanoke County. This disclosure shall
include any business in which such persons own an interest, or from
which income is received, if the primary purpose of the business
is to own, develop or derive compensation through the sale,
exchange or development of real estate in the county. Such
disclosure shall be filed as a condition to assuming office or
employment, and thereafter shall be filed annually on or before
January 15.
4. That the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors shall cause
the forms hereinabove mentioned to be distributed no later than
December 10 of each year to each officer or person required to file
such a form pursuant to this ordinance or Section 2.1-639.15 or
Section 2.1-639.15:1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended.
Such disclosure forms shall be filed and maintained as public
records for five years in the office of the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County.
5. The effective date of this ordinance shall be January 1,
1990.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
&�j
� AtAl'-'
Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989
ORDINANCE 121989-14 RESCINDING ORDINANCE NO.
102489-5 AND ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR AND AUTHO-
RIZING THE SALE OF 5 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, IN
THE GLENVAR WEST PORTION OF ROANOKE COUNTY
(SHAMROCK FIELD)
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the
Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared
to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses,
i.e. economic development; and
2. That Ordinance No. 102489-5 accepting an offer for and
authorizing the sale of ten (10) acres, more or less, in the
Glenvar West portion of Roanoke County (Shamrock Field) and Item
5 of Item K - Consent Agenda - of the November 15, 1989, Board
meeting authorizing an appropriation of capital funds for the Green
Hill Park improvements are hereby rescinded.
3. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the
Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading was held on November 28,
1989; and a second reading was held on December 19, 1989, concern-
ing the sale and disposition of five (5) acres, more or less, in
the Glenvar West portion of Roanoke County (Shamrock field); and
4. That offers having been received for said property, the
offer of Plantation and Kanter, G. P. for Twenty-three Thousand
Dollars ($23,000) per acre to purchase five (5) acres, more or
less, for One Hundred Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($115,000) is hereby
accepted and all other offers are rejected; and
U
5. That all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are
to be placed in the capital facility account; and
6. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute
such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County
as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all
of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to approve ordinance without
paragraph #4, seconded by Supervisor Robers, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Supervisors McGraw, Nickens
On motion of Supervisor McGraw to approve staff recommendation
paragraph #4, seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Z�" �j - Awv.,
Brenda J. H lton, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator
Steve Carpenter, Director, Parks & Recreation
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989
RESOLUTION NO. 121989-15 APPROVING
AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET
FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS
ITEM L -CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That certain section of the agenda of the Board of
Supervisors for December 19, 1989, designated as Item L -Consent
Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each
item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1
through 9, inclusive, as follows:
1. Approval of Minutes - May 9, 1989.
2. Request for approval of Raffle Permit - Loyal Order
of Moose Lodge No. 284.
3. Confirmation of Committee appointment - Industrial
Development Authority.
4. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer facilities
serving, Williamsburg Court and Nichols Estates,
Section #4.
5. Request for acceptance of Legate Drive and Deputy
Drive into the Virginia Department of
Transportation Secondary System
6. Donation of storm drainage and sanitary sewer
easement from Fralin & Waldron Inc., J. Henry
Powers, Calvin W. Powers and P&W Partnership.
7. Donation of a water line easement from Insulation
Systems Inc. of Virginia.
8. Donation of a drainage easement from James S.
Payne.
9. Donation of a drainage easement from Barry J. St.
John and Diane St. John.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and
directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to approve with Item 2
removed, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to approve Item L-2,
seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS; None
ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw
cc:
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. H61ton, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
File
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
ACTION NO. A -121989-15.a
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of a Raffle Permit from the
Loyal Order of Moose Lodge No. 284
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Loyal Order of Moose Lodge No. 284 has requested a Raffle
Permit to be held on December 21, 1989. This application has
been reviewed by the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends
that it be approved.
The organization has paid the $25.00 fee.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit be
approved.
SUBMITTED BY:
Mary H. Allen
Clerk to the Board
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
--------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Apzroved (y) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Harry Yes No Abs
Denied ( ) C. Nickens Garrett x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred McGraw Abstai
To: Nickens x
R
cc: File obers x
Bingo/Raffle File
cc:
ACTION # A -121989-15.b
ITEM NUMBER L-3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE December 19, 1989
SUBJECT: Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the
Industrial Development Authority
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The following nomination has been made and must now be confirmed
by the Board of Supervisors. The nominee has agreed to serve.
Industrial Development Authority
Supervisor Nickens has advised that W. Darnall Vinyard has agreed
to serve another four-year term. His term will expire September
26, 1993.
SUBMITTED BY:
Mary H. Allen
Clerk to the Board
APPROVED BY:
YAI�
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ Yes No Abs
Denied ( ) Steven A. McGraw Garrett x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
To: Nickens x
Robers x
File
Industrial Development Authority File
ACTION # A -121989-15.c
ITEM NUMBER �= 7
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving
Williamsburg Court and Nichols Estate, Section 4.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Developers of Williamsburg Court and Nichols Estate,
Section 4, Roanoke Land Development Corporation, have requested
that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and
sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all
necessary easements.
The water and sewer facilities are installed, as shown on
plans prepared by T. P. Parker and Son entitled Williamsburg Court,
dated March 17, 1988, which are on file in the County Engineering
Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction
meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County.
FISCAL IMPACT•
The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is
$30,000.00 and $60,000.00 respectively.
RECOMMENDATION•
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the
water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivisions along
with all necessary easements, and authorize the County
Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these
facilities.
SUBMITTED BY:
4luutio-W *01F
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
ACTION VOTE
Approved Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ No
Denied ( ) Steven A. McGraw Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw _
to Nickens _
Robers
cc: File
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
L -
Yes Abs
x
x
—X_
x
x
■ 1 / w
It
STARKEY
VICINITY MAP � STATION
4
NORTH
I -r — r.
r. M • / �
N /
11 / a+
+
ask
1
a17.. mu
ACCEPTANCE OF WATER AND SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES
COMMUNITY SERVICES SERVING WILLIAMSBURG COURT AND NICHOLS ESTATE
AND DEVELOPMENT SECTION 4
i
!1
I
»
W7 �•
b
� .ao.c
• � aS �.
l
• AL
.
t
Lp
•I .
la at
�
I
26
g
It
17
•
�
�
1
_. l•
, s , q 39
.00 .s
•
•NmAn • t�K� •
r
S
•
1!
049 Ag
G
CaaalaNM 4 L!
// � • alas
�
�
��'l
4
ACCEPTANCE OF WATER AND SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES
COMMUNITY SERVICES SERVING WILLIAMSBURG COURT AND NICHOLS ESTATE
AND DEVELOPMENT SECTION 4
0
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989
RESOLUTION 121898-15.d REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
LEGATE DRIVE AND DEPUTY DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Legate Drive and
Deputy Drive to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System
of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State
Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and
a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore been
dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Montclair Estates,
Section 8, which map was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 17, of the
records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
County, Virginia, on July 17, 1986 and that by reason of the
recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor
consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-
way for drainage.
3. That said roads known as Legate Drive and Deputy Drive
and which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this
0
Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public roads
to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in
Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official
acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of
Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. Dolton, Deputy Clerk
cc: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections, and
copy for Virginia Department of Transportation
cc:
A -121989-15.e
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. L— `o
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Donation of a storm drainage and sanitary sewer
easement from Fralin & Waldron Inc., J. Henry
Powers, Calvin W. Powers, and P & W Partnership to
the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This consent agenda item involves the donation of a storm
drainage and sanitary sewer easement from Fralin & Waldron Inc.,
J. Henry Powers, Calvin W. Powers, and P & W Partnership to the
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors through real estate designated
as Tax Parcel Nos. 39.20-1-51 and 39.20-1-40 through 44 and shown
on a plat entitled "New Sanitary Sewer Easements" dated October 10,
1989, prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., C.L.S. The location
and dimensions of this donated easement have been reviewed and
approved by the County's engineering staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance
sanitary sewer easement.
Action
of this storm drainage and
Respectfully submitted,
Nfv�- - ' Y l
o\�
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
Approved (x) Motion by Harry C. Nickens/ Garrett
Denied ( ) Steven A. McGraw Johnson
Received ( ) McGraw
Referred Nickens
to Robers
File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
Vote
No Yes Abs
x
x
x
x
x
A -121989-15.f
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. L- /
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Donation of a water line easement from Insulation
Systems Inc. of Virginia to the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This consent agenda item involves the donation of a water line
easement from Insulation Systems Inc. of Virginia to the Roanoke
County Board of Supervisors. The easement is located on Tract III -
B -1 which is located in the Southwest Industrial Park, Cave Spring
Magisterial District, and is shown on a plat for Insulation Systems
Inc. dated November 30, 1989, made by Robert S. Lang, Land Sur-
veyor. The location and dimensions of this donated easement have
been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of this water line easement.
Respectfully submitted,
Paul M*Mahoney
County Attorney
Action
Approved (x) Motion by Harry C- Ni ckpn g Garrett
Denied ( ) Rf-avan pi_ Me -_Craw Johnson
Received ( ) McGraw
Referred Nickens
to Robers
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
Vote
No Yes Abs
x
X
x
x
x
ACTION NO. A -121989-15.g
ITEM NO. L. - O
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Donation of a drainage easement from James S. Payne
to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This consent agenda item involves the donation of a twenty
(20) foot drainage easement from James S. Payne (Deed Book 1163,
page 355) to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
across the southwestern portion of Lot 6, Block 3, Bali Ha'i
Estates. The location and dimensions of this donated easement have
been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of this drainage easement.
Respectfully submitted,
QA YA, W�
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
Action
Vote
No Yes Abs
Approved ( y) Motion by garry r Nom- Png/ Garrett X
Denied ( ) Stetren A McGraw Johnson x
Received ( ) McGraw x
Referred Nickens X
to Robers x
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
ACTION NO. A -121989-15.h
ITEM NO. L
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Donation of a drainage easement from Barry J. St.
John and Diane St. John to the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND•
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This consent agenda item involves the donation of a twenty
(20) foot drainage easement from Barry J. St. John and Diane St.
John (Deed Book 1164, page 355) to the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, as shown on a plat showing "New 20'
Drainage Easement" dated 14 November 1989 prepared by Buford T.
Lumsden & Associates, P.C.
The location and dimensions of this donated easement have
been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of this drainage easement.
Respectfully submitted,
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
Action
Approved ) Motion by carry r Nirkens/ Garrett
Denied ( ) Stevan n M -r -raw Johnson
Received ( ) McGraw
Referred Nickens
to Robers
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
Vote
No Yes Abs
x
x
x
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY , VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989
RESOLUTION 121989-16 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE
MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF
VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant
to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the
provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia
requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia that such executive meeting was conducted in
conformity with Virginia Law.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia hereby certifies that, to
the best of each members knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from
open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the
executive meeting which this certification resolution applies,
and
2. Only such public business matters as were identified
in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard,
discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia.
On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor
Robers, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
t
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
CC: File
Executive Session File
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989
RESOLUTION R-121989-17 REQUESTING THE GENERAL
ASSEMBLY FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA TO
GRANT A GOVERNMENTAL CHARTER FOR THE ROANOKE
METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT
WHEREAS, Article VII, Section 2 of the Constitutional of
Virginia, and Chapter 17 of Title 15.1 of the Code of Virginia
authorizes the General Assembly to grant a governmental charter for
the Roanoke Metropolitan Government; and
WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke and the City of Roanoke intend
to effectuate a consolidation of their respective governments into
a regional government, which is a unit of general government,
identified as the Roanoke Metropolitan Government; and
WHEREAS, Roanoke County has complied with the provisions of
Section 15.1-835 of the Code of Virginia, and has held public
hearing on December 19, 1989, after due legal notice, at which the
citizens had the opportunity to be heard concerning this proposed
charter.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, that the General Assembly for the
Commonwealth of Virginia is hereby requested to grant a charter for
the Roanoke Metropolitan Government, a unit of general government
deemed a regional government. This charter for the Roanoke
Metropolitan Government is attached hereto and incorporated herein
by reference for submission as a bill for consideration by the
General Assembly of Virginia.
On motion of Supervisor Robers to approve charter incorporat-
ing changes and corrections as presented, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
"Op/.
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, Roanoke County Attorney
W. C. Dibling, Jr, Roanoke City Attorney
John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Roanoke Valley Legislators
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989
ORDINANCE 121989-18 TO CHANGE THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF A 3.13 ACRE TRACT OF REAL
ESTATE LOCATED AT 6044 COVE ROAD IN THE
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF R1 TO THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF RE WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE
APPLICATION OF JAMES AND CHARLOTTE MOORE
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
November 28, 1989, and the second reading and public hearing was
held on December 19, 1989; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public
hearing on this matter on December 5, 1989; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real
estate containing 3.13 acres, as described herein, and located at
6044 Cove Road, Roanoke County, Virginia, (Tax Map Number 36.11-
2-35) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from
the zoning classification of R1, Single Family Residential
District, to the zoning classification of RE, Residential Estate
District.
2. That this action is taken upon the application of James and
Charlotte Moore.
3. That the applicant has voluntarily proffered in writing the
following condition which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts:
(1) The property is being rezoned to allow a maximum of
two horses to be kept for personal use; this being the only use
permitted in the request for rezoning of the property, restricting
all other uses permitted under RE, Residential Estate District.
4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on Cove Road, corner to
the property of Elmer and Anna Boone Divers,
as shown in Deed Book 341, at page 363, in the
Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
County, Virginia; thence, with Cove Road S. 340
30' 00" E. 165.11 feet to a found iron, corner
to the property of Jack G. Garst, as shown in
Deed Book 948, at page 235 in the aforesaid
Clerk's Office; thence S. 550 29' 15" W. 807.12
feet to a found iron, said point being the
southwest corner of the property herein
conveyed; thence N. 040 24' 10" W. 224.36 feet
to a found iron, said point being the
northwesterly corner of the property herein
conveyed; thence proceeding N. 570 52' 35" E.
695.21 feet to the point of BEGINNING,
containing 3.115 acres, more or less, as shown
by survey made for James Alan Moore and
Charlotte Scott Moore by Kenneth E. Carlton,
C.L.S., dated June 4, 1986.
5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be December
19, 1989.
On motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by Supervisor Robers,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk
cc: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989
ORDINANCE 121989-19 TO CHANGE THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF 11.848 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE
LOCATED AT THE END OF BENOIS ROAD IN THE CAVE
SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF R1 TO THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF M1 FOR INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE
APPLICATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, by Resolution 91289-4 the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, initiated amendments to the Comprehensive
Plan and to the classifications of certain real estate located in
Roanoke County to serve the public purposes of the County as
required by public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and
good zoning practice in order to implement the recommendations of
the Economic Development Action Plan for FY 1989-90; and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
October 24, 1989, and the second reading and public hearing was
held on December 19, 1989; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public
hearing on this matter on November 9, 1989; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real
estate containing 11.848 acres, as described herein, owned by
Atlantic Concrete and located at the end of Benois Road in the Cave
Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning
classification of R-1, Single-family Residential District, to the
zoning classification of M1, Light Industrial District.
2. That the Board initiated the application to change the
zoning classification of this real estate located in Roanoke County
to serve the public purposes of the County as required by public
necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice
to implement the recommendations of the Economic Development Action
Plan for FY 1989-90.
3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
Beginning at a point designated No. 1, being the north-
westerly corner of an 11.848 -acre tract herein -described,
said point being corner to the property of the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, and on the line
of Lot 6, Block G, Section 3, Penn Forest; thence leaving
said Point of Beginning and following a line between
Section 3, Penn Forest, and the property herein -des-
cribed, N. 360 51' E. 1326.2 feet to Point No. 2; thence
continuing with Penn Forest, Section 5, and the property
herein -described, N. 340 00' E. 195.00 feet to Point No.
3; thence continuing with Section 5, Penn Forest, N. 380
25' E. 467.1 feet to Point No. 4, corner to the property
of Harold E. Rose, et al.; thence with the Rose property
and the property herein -described, S. 670 11' E. 110 feet
to Point No. 5; thence following the zoning line between
R-1 and M-2, property of Atlantic Concrete, S. 19° 44'
07" W. 367.26 feet to Point No. 6; thence continuing with
said zoning line, S. 210 17' W. 135.00 feet to Point No.
7; thence S. 350 11' 04" W. 1554.74 feet to Point No. 8
on the line of the property of the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia; thence with the Board of
Supervisors property and the property herein -described,
N. 49° 13' W. 300 feet to the Point of Beginning and
being a parcel of land containing 11.848 acres, being
zoned R-1 and being as shown on zoning plat for A. V.
Criss Sr. Trust by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers and
Surveyors dated October 25, 1989.
4. That Atlantic Concrete, as owner of this real estate, has
voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the
Board of Supervisors hereby accepts:
(1) The property will not include permitted uses for:
(a) Automobile painting, upholstering, repairing,
rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender
work, truck repairing or overhauling;
(b) Manufacturing of pottery and figurines or other
similar ceramic products;
(c) Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with
exterior runs and yards;
(d) Flea Markets, unless a special exception has
been granted by the Board of Supervisors; and
(e) Seed and feed stores.
(2) A minimum 100 foot buffer yard along the western
property boundaries to be otherwise administered in conformance
with Section 21-92 of the Zoning Ordinance; that existing vegeta-
tion be retained within the 100 foot buffer yard, and supplemented
where necessary in order to maintain the existing screening of this
site from adjoining residences.
(3) Sound levels shall not exceed 60 dba when measured
at adjoining residences.
(4) Hours of operation shall be limited from 6:00 a.m.
to 11:00 p.m. on this property.
5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be December
19, 1989.
On motion of Supervisor Robers, seconded by Supervisor McGraw,
i
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. Ho on, Deputy, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989
ORDINANCE 121989-20 TO CHANGE THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF APPROXIMATELY 125 ACRES OF
REAL ESTATE LOCATED SOUTH OF ROUTES 11 AND
460, SOUTH AND WEST OF BARLEY DRIVE AND THE
N&W RAILWAY IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DIS-
TRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION A-1MH TO
M-1 FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH CONDITIONS
UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPER-
VISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA.
WHEREAS, by Resolution 91289-4 the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, initiated amendments to the Comprehensive
Plan and to the classifications of certain real estate located in
Roanoke County to serve the public purposes of the County as
required by public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and
good zoning practice to implement the recommendations of the
Economic Development Action Plan for FY 1989-90; and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
October 24, 1989, and the second reading and public hearing was
held on December 19, 1989; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public
hearing on this matter on November 9, 1989; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real
estate containing approximately 125 acres, as described herein,
owned by Salem West Corporation and located south of Routes 11 and
460, south and west of Barley Drive and the N&W Railway in the
Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning
classification A-1MH, Agricultural Manufacturerd Housing District,
to the zoning classification of M-1, Light Industrial District, for
industrial development.
2. That the Board initiated the application to change the
zoning classification of this real estate located in Roanoke County
to serve the public purposes of the County as required by public
necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice
to implement the recommendations of the Economic Development Action
Plan for FY 1989-90.
3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
Beginning at Corner 23, an iron pin located in an old
fence line and being the common corner with the south
line of a 50 foot right-of-way and also, being a common
corner with Daniel Wentworth Richards; thence with the
south line of said right-of-way in an easterly direction
N. 860 39' 49" E. 951.31 feet in all to corner 24, an
iron pin; thence continuing with the east line in a
northerly line N. 100 51' 17" W. 837.94 feet to corner
25, an iron pin; thence leaving said 50 foot right-of-
way and with property of Daniel Wentworth Richards,
deceased (Deed Book 869, page 171); thence in an easterly
direction 740 36' 05" E. 1,493.81 feet to corner 26, an
iron pin; thence N. 300 25' 23" 206.00 feet; thence N.
170 20' 23" E. 263.00 feet; thence S. 100 55' 57" E.
2,192.42 feet (along zoning line) bearing left of corner
16 and an iron pin; thence continuing in a westerly
direction S. 130 45' 07" W. 1,192.90 feet to corner 17;
thence to 18 (maple snag) N. 690 45' 04" W. ; thence N.
760 46' 26" W. 1,226.95 feet passing through a gum tree;
thence N. 830 29' 15" W. 1,52.54 feet to corner 20 and
existing iron pin; thence N. 30 16' 13" W. to corner 21
and existing iron pin; thence N. 880 55' 47' E. 433.61
feet to corner 22 and white oak tree at spring; thence
N. 70 14' 53" W. 629.52 feet to the place of beginning.
3. That Salem -West Corporation, as owner of this real estate,
has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which
the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts:
(1) The following uses shall be excluded from any
development at this site:
(a) Automobile painting, upholstering, repairing,
rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender
work, truck repairing or overhauling;
(b) Manufacturing of pottery and figurines or other
similar ceramic products;
(c) Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with
exterior runs and yards;
(d) Flea Markets, unless a special exception has
been granted by the Board of Supervisors; and
(e) Seed and feed stores.
(2) No industrial access shall be acquired from Yale
Drive.
4. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be Decmeber
19, 1989.
On motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by Supervisor Robers,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk
cc: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989
ORDINANCE 121989-21 TO CHANGE THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF APPROXIMATELY 19 ACRES OF
REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE HOLLINS MAGIS-
TERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFI-
CATION OF Al TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF
M1 FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH CONDITIONS
UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, by Resolution 91289-4 the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, initiated amendments to the Comprehensive
Plan and to the classifications of certain real estate located in
Roanoke County to serve the public purposes of the County as
required by public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and
good zoning practice in order to implement the recommendations of
the Economic Development Action Plan for FY 1989-90; and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
November 28, 1989, and the second reading and public hearing was
held on December 19, 1989; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public
hearing on this matter on December 5, 1989; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real
estate containing approximately 19 acres --a 6.6 acre tract located
south of the terminus of Friendship Lane and an 11.3 acre tract
adjacent to the northeast boundary of ITT and approximately 75 feet
northeast from the end of Lila Drive, both tracts as described
herein, owned by Raymond B. and Hazel H. Huffman and located in the
Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning
classification of Al, Agricultural District, to the zoning class-
ification of M1, Light Industrial District.
2. That the Board initiated the application to change the
zoning classification of this real estate located in Roanoke County
to serve the public purposes of the County as required by public
necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice
to implement the recommendations of the Economic Development Action
Plan for FY 1989-90.
3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
Beginning at an iron pin on the south side of Lila Drive
(Virginia Route 5018) 973.5' east of Plantation Road
(Virginia Route 115); thence with the south side of Lila
Drive N. 710 43' 12" E. 51.07' to a point; thence leaving
Lila Drive through the property of Raymond B. and Hazel
H. Huffman the following courses: S. 300 00' 34" E.
242.03' to a point; N. 620 46' 20" E. 326.72' to a point;
N. 770 32' 12" E. 130.14' to a point in the center of an
existing 20' right-of-way; thence along the centerline
of said 20' right-of-way the following courses: S. 330
47' 29" E. 33.56' to a point; S. 470 32' 39" E. 39.68' to
a point; S. 250 32' 39" E. 41.05' to a point; thence with
the west line of John H. and Cynthia H. Huffman S. 250
32' 39" E. 451.76' to a point; thence through the
property of Raymond B. and Hazel H. Huffman S. 280 19'
29" E. 467.66' to an iron pin; thence with said Huffman
and the north line of Rajesh R. Desai the following
courses: S. 790 27' 31" W. 436.40' to an iron pin; S.
640 07' 31" W. 51.16' to an iron pin; thence with said
Huffman and the east line of Dairymen, Inc. and Interna-
tional Telephone and Telegraph Corporation N. 300 00' 34"
W., a total distance of 1188.46' passing an iron pin at
489.77' to the point of beginning and containing 11.349
acres as shown on plat by Balzer & Associates Inc. for
Raymond B. and Hazel H. Huffman, dated October 26, 1989.
and
2
Beginning at an iron pin on the south side of Friendship
Lane (Virginia Secondary Route 1895) 14001± east of
Plantation Road (Virginia Route 115); thence with the
south side of Friendship Lane N. 490 34' 24" E. 242.55'
to a point; thence leaving Friendship Lane and with the
south line of Danny R. Myers N. 610 02' 10" E. 98.84' to
a point in the center of Carvin's Creek; thence with the
centerline of Carvin's Creek the following courses: S.
380 42' 10" E. 258.18' to a point; S. 250 32' 43" E.
202.90' to a point; S. 010 28' 04" E. 30.29' to a point;
S. 320 09' 10" E. 324.71' to a point; thence leaving
Carvin's Creek a line through the property of Raymond B.
and Hazel H. Huffman S. 610 00' 55" W. 371.93' to an iron
pin; thence with said Huffman and the east line of AMP,
Incorporated N. 280 59' 05" W. 760.00' to the point of
beginning and containing 6.626 acres as shown on plat by
Balzer & Associates, Inc. for Raymond B. and Hazel H.
Huffman, dated October 25, 1989.
4. That Raymond B. Huffman and Hazel H. Huffman, as owners of
this real estate, have voluntarily proffered in writing the follow-
ing conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts:
(1) The property will not include permitted uses for:
(a) Automobile painting, upholstering, repairing,
rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender
work, truck repairing or overhauling;
(b) Seed and feed stores;
(c) Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with
exterior runs and yards; and
(d) Commercial laundry and dry cleaning plants;
(e) Flea markets - inside a structure only -
provided a special exception has been granted
by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia.
(2) Ensure Type E screening and buffering along those
boundaries which abut residential uses.
(3) Sound levels shall not exceed 60 dba when measured
at adjoining residences.
3
(5) No outside, nighttime uses after 11 p.m. will be
allowed in the M1 District.
5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be
December 19, 1989.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens with Proffer #4 deleted,
seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisor McGraw, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Supervisor Johnson
A COPY TESTE:
&a6:, lr'12Q�
Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney