Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
3/22/2011 - Regular
z ►o Fir ppa Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Agenda March 22, 2011 Good afternoon and welcome to our meeting for March 22, 2011. Regular meetings are held on the second and fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Friday at 7:00 p.m. and on Sunday at 4:00 p.m. Our meetings are now closed- captioned, so it is important for everyone to speak directly into the microphones at the podium. Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772 -2005 at least 48 hours in advance. Please turn all cell phones off or place on silent. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 p.m.) 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation: Pastor Stafford Frederick Summerdean Church of the Brethren 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of congratulations to the Northside High School girls' softball team for winning the Virginia High School League (VHSL) Group AA State Championship D. BRIEFINGS Page 1 of 5 E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request to adopt a resolution setting the allocation percentage for personal property tax relief for the 2011 tax year (Rebecca E. Owens, Director of Finance) 2. Request to approve the health insurance plan and rates for County and School employees for fiscal year 2011 -2012 (Rebecca E. Owens, Director of Finance) 3. Request to approve the dental insurance plan and rates for County and School employees for fiscal year 2011 -2012 (Rebecca E. Owens, Director of Finance) 4. Review Volunteer Incentive Program (VIP) requirements and exception for Firefighter Barry Yates (B. Clayton Goodman III, County Administrator) F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCE - CONSENT AGENDA 1. The petition of Kenneth J. and Linda J. Lapiejko to obtain a Special Use Permit in a R -1, Low Density Residential, District to operate a private stable on 44.5 acres, located at 3525 Harborwood Road, Catawba Magisterial District 2. The petition of Douglas R. and Mary E. McCallum to obtain a Special Use Permit in an AG -1, Agricultural /Rural Low Density, District to operate a small wind energy system on 2.414 acres, located at 4824 Wade Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District G. APPOINTMENTS 1. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Review Committee (appointed by District) 2. League of Older Americans Board of Directors (appointed by LOA and ratified by the County) 3. Parks, Recreation and Tourism Commission (appointed by District) 4. Roanoke County Community Leaders Environmental Action Roundtable (RC CLEAR) (appointed by District) Page 2 of 5 H. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY 1. Approval of minutes — March 1, 2011; March 8, 2011 2. Request to appropriate $19,087.50 to the Clerk of the Circuit Court from the State for fiscal year 2010 -2011 3. Confirmation of appointments to the League of Older Americans Board of Directors; Parks, Recreation and Tourism Commission; Roanoke Valley - Alleghany Regional Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) Committee 4. Request for appointment of Alternate Representative from the Department of Social Services to the Roanoke County Community Policy Management Team (CPMT) I. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS J. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS K. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS L. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Reserves 3. Reserve for Board Contingency 4. Treasurer's Statement of Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy as of February 28, 2011 5. Statement of Budgeted and Actual Revenues as of February 28, 2011 6. Statement of Budgeted and Actual Expenditures and Encumbrances as of February 28, 2011 Page 3of5 M. WORK SESSIONS 1. Work session to discuss fiscal year 2011 -2012 budget development (W. Brent Robertson, Director of Management and Budget) 2. Work session on County of Roanoke Transportation (CORTRAN) (B. Clayton Goodman III, County Administrator; Laurie Gearhart, Deputy Director of Finance; Terrie Cochran, Executive Assistant) 3. Work session on the Virginia Retirement System (VRS) (Diane D. Hyatt, Assistant County Administrator) N. CLOSED MEETING, pursuant to the Code of Virginia as follows: 1. Section 2.2.3711.A.1 namely discussion concerning appointments to the League of Older Americans Advisory Council; Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission EVENING SESSION — 7:00 P.M. O. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION P. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance granting a Special Use Permit for adrive -in or fast food restaurant on a 0.62 acre parcel located at 4309 Starkey Road, (Tax Map No. 77.19 -1- 29.02), Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Ray Craighead (Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning) 2. Ordinance authorizing amendments and additions to the Roanoke County Design Handbook to assist in the implementation of Chapter 30 of the Roanoke County Code (Zoning Ordinance) pertaining to private road standards and creating new standards for sidewalks, shared use paths, private trails and bicycle accommodations (Megan Cronise, Principal Planner) Q. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Public hearings for citizen comment on the following items: (W. Brent Robertson, Director of Management and Budget) (a) Real estate, personal property and machinery and tools tax rates (b) General comment on the upcoming annual budget for fiscal year 2011- 2012 Page 4 of 5 2. Request to adopt the following tax rates for calendar year 2012: (W. Brent Robertson, Director of Management and Budget) (a) Real estate tax rate of $1.09 per $100 assessed valuation (b) Personal property tax rate of $3.50 per $100 assessed valuation (c) Machinery and tools tax rate of $3.00 per $100 assessed valuation R. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS S. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 1. Richard C. Flora 2. Eddie "Ed" Elswick 3. Charlotte M. Moore 4. Michael W. Altizer 5. Joseph B. "Butch" Church T. ADJOURNMENT TO TUESDAY, MARCH 29, 2011 AT 4:30 P.M. FOR A SPECIAL MEETING ON MARCH 29, 2011 AT 4:30 P.M. AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER Page 5 of 5 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. C -1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 22, 2011 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution of congratulations to the Northside High School girls' softball team for winning the Virginia High School League (VHSL) Group AA State Championship SUBMITTED BY: Deborah C. Jacks Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator � 0v- COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Northside High School girls' softball team won the VHSL Group AA State Championship. Along with the players and their families, Coach Lynn Richmond will attend the meeting. All assistant coaches are invited as well. Superintendent Lange and School Board member Jerry Canada are also expected to be in attendance. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE RoANoKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 22, 2311 RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS To THE NORTHSICE HIGH SCHOOLGIRLS' SOFTBALLTEAM FOR WINNING THE VIRGINIA HIGH SCHOOL LEAGUE (VHSL) GROUP AA STATE CHAMPIONSHIP WHEREAS, team sports are an important part of the curriculum at schools in Roanoke County, teaching cooperation, sportsmanship and athletic skill; and WHEREAS, the Northside High School girls' softball team won the VHSL Group AA State Championship on June 13, 2313 at Radford University by defeating Abington High School (1 to 0) in eight innings; and WHEREAS, the Lady Vikings won their first State Championship title and finished their season with a record of 23 to 2; and WHEREAS, on its way to the state Championship, Northside High School took home the Region III championship and shut out Powhatan High School; and WHEREAS, the Northside Lady Vikings finished their season by winning their 11 Blue Ridge regular season title in twelve years in a playoff with William Byrd and Alleghany; and WHEREAS, the Lady Vikings earned their trip to the State championship game by defeating Liberty, Fort Defiance and Amherst to decisively win the Regional 11 Tournament; and WHEREAS, Lauren Boitnot was Timesland First Team AA All State and State AS Pitcher of the year; and WHEREAS, the Vikings are under the dedicated leadership of Coach Lynn Richmond, all District, Region, Timesland and State Coach of the Year and Head Middle Page 1 of 2 School Coach Ranny Grubb, Head Junior Varsity Softball Coach Allison Thornton and Assistant Coaches: Nancy Furman, Donald Jarrett, Shannon Yopp, Rick Jarrard and Fred Weaver. WHEREAS, THE Northside High School Girls' Softball Team has demonstrated an outstanding commitment to the goals and ideals of high school athletics as well as excellence on the playing field. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to the members of the NORTHSIDE HIGH SCHOOL SOFTBALL 'SEAM: Lauren Boitnot, Kathleen Carr, Kasey Craft, Michele Epilon, Leanne Fix, Taylor Grubb, Cara Hoopes, Kelsey Jarrett, Marta Jones, Brie Pinero, Caitlyn Porterfield, Aisha Wiley; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to the members of the team, the coaches, and the school in their future endeavors. Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. E -1 AT A REGULAR MEE - rlNG OF - rHE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRA - riON CENTER MEETING DA7rE: March 22, 2011 AGENDA ITEM: Request to adopt a resolution setting the allocation percentage for personal property tax relief for the 2011 tax year SUBMITTED BY: Rebecca Owens Director of Finance APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The Personal Property Tax Relief Act (PPTRA or the Act) of 1998 established a state -wide program to provide relief to owners of personal use motor vehicles. The 1998 Act envisioned a five year phase -in of relief expressed as a percentage of the bill related to the first $20,000 of personal use vehicle value. Costs soared and the percentage was frozen at seventy percent (70 %) since 2001. In 2004 and 2005, additional legislation was passed to amend the original Act. This legislation capped PPTRA at $959 million for all Virginia localities for Tax Years 2005 and beyond. PPTRA funds are allocated to individual localities based on each government's pro rata share of Tax Year 2004 payments from the Commonwealth. - rhe County's share of the $950 million is $12,229,857. At the December 20, 2005, Board Meeting Ordinance 122005 -10 amending the Roanoke County Code by adding a new Section 21 -225 to provide for the implementation of the 2004 -2005 changes to the Personal Property Tax Relief Act (PPTRA) of 1998 was adopted by the Board of Supervisors. Page 1 of 2 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The county uses The PPTRA Allocation Model developed by the State to calculate the effective reimbursement rate. This model uses historical trends and a five year rolling average to calculate the effective reimbursement rate. This same methodology for calculating the rate is used by many of our neighboring localities. In 2011, once again County staff computed the effective reimbursement rate based upon the PPTRA allocation model. The percentage is similar to those localities that are ready to adopt their resolutions. The rate for the county is sixty six point three eight percent (88.38 %) and The Town of Vinton is sixty eight point five one percent (88.81 %). The Board is required by the State to annually adopt a resolution setting the percentage reduction in personal property for that year. The attached resolution establishes the percentage reduction at sixty six point three eight percent (88.38 %) for the 2011 tax year. FISCAL IMPACT: The percentage reduction is calculated to distribute the $12,229,857 block grant allocation from the State in the manner described above. There will be some timing delays in the receipt of the State funds, since they are now being received in the following fiscal year (2011- 2012), but we will be allowed to accrue these funds back to the 2010-2011 year for accounting purposes so that our budget will be balanced. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff reviewed this calculation and recommends adopting the attached resolution which establishes the percentage reduction for personal property tax relief at sixty six point three eight percent (66.38 %) for Roanoke County for the 2011 tax year. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 22, 2011 RESOLUTION SETTING THE ALLOCATION PERCENTAGE FOR PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX RELIEF IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR THE 2011 TAX YEAR WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements set forth in Section 58.1 -3524 (C) (2) and Section 58.1 -3912 (E) of the Code of Virginia, as amended by Chapter 1 of the Acts of Assembly and as set forth in item 503.E (Personal Property Tax Relief Program or "PPTRA ") of Chapter 951 of the 2005 Acts of Assembly and qualifying vehicle with a taxable situs within the County commencing January 1, 2011, shall receive personal property tax relief; and, WHEREAS, this Resolution is adopted pursuant to Ordinance 122005 -10 adopted by the Board of Supervisors on December 20, 2005. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, as follows: 1. That tax relief shall be allocated so as to eliminate personal property taxation for qualifying personal use vehicles valued at $1,000 or less. 2. That qualifying personal use vehicles valued at $1,001 - $20,000 will be eligible for 66.38% tax relief. 3. That qualifying personal use vehicles valued at $20,001 or more shall only receive 66.38% tax relief on the first $20,000 of value; and 4. That all other vehicles which do not meet the definition of qualifying (for example, including but not limited to, business use vehicles, farm use vehicles, motor homes, etc.) will not be eligible for any form of tax relief under this program. Page 1 of 2 5. That the percentages applied to the categories of qualifying personal use vehicles are estimated fully to use all available PPTRA funds allocated to Roanoke County by the Commonwealth of Virginia. 6. Supplemental assessments for tax years 2005 and prior shall be deemed non - qualifying for purposes of state tax relief and the local share due from the taxpayer shall represent one hundred percent (100 %) of the assessed personal property tax. 7. That this Resolution shall be effective from and after the date of its adoption. Page of ACTION NO. ITEM NO. E -2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 22, 2011 AGENDA ITEM: Request to approve the health insurance plan and rates for County and School employees for 2011 -2012 SUBMITTED BY: Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III Count y Administrator -- COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The County of Roanoke and Roanoke County Public Schools participate in a joint health insurance program for eligible employees. The Roanoke Valley Resource Authority (RVRA) and the Western Virginia Regional Jail Authority (WVRJA) also participate in our plan. This medical plan is self- funded with reinsurance coverage to protect the financial risk assumed. Linder the current contract, reinsurance is composed of two elements: specific and aggregate stop loss. The specific stop loss threshold is $200,000. Specific reinsurance protects the plan from any catastrophic claims paid on a member during the plan year. The aggregate limit of one hundred and fifteen percent (115 %) protects the total financial liability assumed for the plan at fifteen percent (15 %) above "expected" claims level. The plan purchases administrative services, access to the network physicians and facilities, and claims administration from Anthem. On February 21, 2011, the insurance committee, made up of Finance, Human Resources, Administration and employee representatives for the county, Schools and Western Virginia Regional Jail Authority, met to review the renewal and discuss recommendations for the 2011-2012 plan year. A review of paid claims experience of the County, Schools and western Virginia Regional Jail Authority for the most recent twelve months generates an increase in rates of four point eight percent (4.8 %) and budgets the maximum liability at one hundred and five percent 0 05 %). Historically, we have set the rates at the maximum liability, however over the past Page 1 of 3 several years the insurance reserves have grown as a result of budgeting rates at the maximum liability and claims experience has been less than the maximum liability. The health insurance rates will be increased four point eight percent (4.8 %), which is adequate to cover projected claims for the plan. Employee rates will remain unchanged and the health insurance reserves will fund the health insurance increase for 2011 -2012. Two benefit modifications are recommended for the 2011112 policy year as follows: • Extend coverage for adult dependent children) to age 26 (current dependent age: 19/25 student) as required by The Affordable Care Act (ACA). • Adopt the expanded definition of what is considered preventive services as defined by Anthem. Preventive services will continue to be covered at one hundred percent (100 %). Since the medical plan is self funded, the historical claims paid on the program are used to establish rates and employee contributions for the plan. Some cost drivers from the review period January 2010 through December 2010 are outlined below: • Total claims, as a cost per member, have increased four point eight percent (4.8 %) from calendar year 2009 to 2010. • During the review period, there were eight claimants who exceeded the $200,000 specific stop loss limit. Additionally, there have been twenty -four (24) claimants with claims in excess of $1 00,000. The incidence of large claims is higher with this renewal cycle than in the past five renewal review periods. • In- network utilization of the plan continues to be high with ninety nine percent (99 %) of claim dollars submitted with network providers. The use of Anthem's network providers protect members from balance billing and lowers out -of- pocket costs. • Outpatient prescription drug claims comprise twenty one point three percent (21.3 %) of total claims expense on the plan. This is slightly higher than the industry average of eighteen to twenty percent (18% to 20 %). These expenses increased four point eight percent (4.8 %) from 2010 versus 2009. Generic utilization of prescription drugs is very strong at seventy one percent (71 %) during calendar year 2010. Wells Fargo Insurance Services also negotiated that Anthem will provide the Plan a wellness credit of $60,000 for the 2011/2012 policy year and annual savings of $30,000 through the reductions of fees for network access, specific and aggregate stop loss. The County and Schools have consistently kept overall medical costs below the national average with annual increases of four point one percent (4.1 %) for 201012011, zero percent (0 %) for 200912010, three point four seven percent (3.47 %) for 200812009, seven point three percent (7.3 %) for 200712008, eight percent (8 %) for 200612007, five point five Page 2of3 (5.5 %) for 2666/2666 and nine point seven percent (9.7°/x) for 266412666, while national averages have ranged from eleven to twenty percent (11 % to 20 %) during that time period. The Insurance Committee has been successful in maintaining favorable performance during this time through plan design changes that have addressed the underlying cost drivers of the program. In the fall of 2611, our insurance consultant, wells Fargo Insurance Services, will conduct a study of - the health insurance program to explore multiple plan options for employees to select what best meets their individual needs with a proposed implementation date of July 1, 2612. Attachment A shows the current and proposed rates for eligible County and School employees as well as the monthly increase in cost. The Schools are scheduled to consider this proposal at their meeting on March 24, 2611. FISCAL IMPACT: Employee rates will remain unchanged and the increase of four point eight percent (4.8 %) will be funded from the health insurance reserves. Funding from the reserves in the amount of $368,212 for the increase in health insurance has been included in the 2611/2612 budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving a contract with Anthem to provide our medical program and the attached health insurance rates for fiscal year 261112612. Page 3 of 3 Roanoke County and Roanoke County Schools Attachment A Health Insurance Renewal Rates 2011 -12 PPO Plan Design Increase Monthly County Employee Employee for Premium Benefit Rate Pas Employee Current 2010 -11 Subscriber Only 483.34 433.98 49.36 10.21% $ - Subscriber + 1 minor 682.30 454.20 228.10 33.43% $ Employee + Spouse 990.82 629.62 361.20 36.45% $ - Family 1160.18 734.22 425.96 36.71% $ - Married School & County Couple 1160.18 920.56 1 239.62 1 20.65% $ - Renewal 2011 -12 PPO Plan Desian Subscriber Only 506.54 457.18 49.36 9.74% $ - Subscriber + 1 minor 715.04 486.94 228.10 31.90% $ Employee + Spouse 1038.38 677.18 361.20 34.78% $ - Family 1215.88 789.92 425.96 35.03% $ - Married School & County Couple 1215.88 976.26 239.62 19.71% $ - Current Membershi Countv Schools Subscriber Only 481 68 51 203 952 122 116 417 Subscriber + minor Employee + Spouse Family Total Members 803 1607 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. E -3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 22, 2011 AGENDA ITEM: Request to approve - the dental insurance plan and rates for County and School employees for fiscal year 2011 -2012 SUBMITTED BY: Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator xC COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The County of Roanoke and Roanoke County Public Schools participate in the joint purchase of dental coverage for their eligible employees and retirees through the Roanoke Valley Regional Health Care Consortium. 2011 is the fourth year of the contract awarded to Delta Dental, and the first year without a guaranteed rate cap. Delta's original renewal package proposed a five point nine percent (5.9 %) rate increase. After an independent underwriting review and negotiations with Delta Dental, Wells Fargo was able to have Delta agree to a five percent (5 %) increase. Since the dental plan is on a calendar year basis, a blended rate is calculated for the employee rate each year in order to avoid changing the rates in the middle of the year. Dental rates for employees are brought forward to the Board during the spring, for approval. Retirees pay a premium that is based on their experience in the dental plan. The dental rates will need to be increased for 2011 -2012 as outlined on Attachment A and would be effective July 1, 2011. Employee rates will not change and dental reserves will be used to cover the increase in premium for 2011 -2012. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the dental reserves to cover the full cost of the increased premium. Page 1 of 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving the dental insurance plan and rates for fiscal year 2011 -2012. Page 2 of 2 Roanoke County and Roanoke County Schools Dental Insurance Renewal Rates 2011 -12 Employees: Dental Plan Monthly County Premium Benefit Current 2010 -11 Employee Employee Rate I Pays Attachment A Increase for Retiree Emplovee Rate Subscriber Only 26.64 19.76 6.88 25.83% $ - 41.48 Subscriber + 1 43.38 24.20 19.18 44.21% $ - 67.74 Family 75.06 34.72 40.34 53.74% $ - 117.96 Married School & County Couple 75.06 52.86 22.20 29.58% $ - n/a Renewal 2011 -12 Dental Plan Subscriber Only 27.98 21.10 6.88 24.59% $ - 43.55 Subscriber + 1 45.54 26.36 19.18 42.12% $ - 71.13 Family 78.82 38.48 40.34 51.18% $ - 123.86 Married School & County Couple 1 78.82 56.62 22.20 28.17% $ - n/a Subscriber Onl Subscriber + 1 Family Total Members Current Membership County Schools 431 818 179 328 231 494 841 1640 Retiree Membership County Schools 86 377 53 219 10 10 149 606 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. E -4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROrANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 22, 2011 AGENDA ITEM: Review Volunteer Incentive Program (VIP) requirements and exception for Firefighter Barry Yates SUBMITTED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator � COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Representatives from the VIP Board presented to the Board of Supervisors (BoS) the information found below. This information was addressing the BoS request that the VIP Board review the case of an individual who had been certified as a firefighter and eligible for the VIP program and through a change by the state certifying agency lost his certification. The volunteer chief from Mason Cove Volunteer Fire Department (VFD) was asking that the County provide a special exemption for this individual and any others who may fall into this category. At the February 22, 2011 meeting, the VIP Board's Chairman and Vice Chairman presented the VIP Board's two alternatives regarding this matter and the VIP Board's recommendation found herein. If you have any questions, please contact me. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The VIP program was implemented in 2006 as a way to incentivize volunteers for meeting minimum training requirements, as indicated in county policy. The rules and regulations of the program were created by the VIP Board (made up of three volunteer firefighters, three volunteer Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) and two county finance representatives) and approved by the Board of Supervisors. One of the rules does require volunteer firefighters to become minimum Firefighter 1 certified with 18 months, while volunteer EMS members are similarly required to become minimum certified at the EMT /Basic level within 18 months of acceptance. This rule mirrors the county policy and was put into place to reward volunteers for meeting the first step in training and certification. Page 1 of 3 The VIP Board has worked diligently to adhere to the rules and regulations of the VIP program in order to ensure it rewards those who meet the minimum requirements as set forth in fire and rescue policy. The VIP board is regularly approached by volunteers who seek to have an exception made for them, however they feel strongly that the rules and regulations of the program are reasonable and fair for all fire and rescue volunteers. In September of 2010, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors was addressed by Volunteer Chief Emerson Schoonover requesting an exception be made for volunteer firefighter Barry Yates who had not met the rules and regulations of the Volunteer Incentive Program (VIP) — specifically, he was not minimum Firefighter 1 certified. Mr. Yates joined the Masons Cove Volunteer Fire Company in 1985 and became Firefighter 1 certified. This certification was valid for five years, at that time, expiring in 1991. Additionally, Mr. Yates joined the Masons Cove Volunteer Rescue Squad n 1989 and continues to maintain an active Emergency Medical Technician (EMT)-Basic certification. He is fully vested in the Length of Service Awards Program and is due to receive the maximum payout of $240 a month at age 55. Previously, Mr. Yates has received payouts with the VIP program under the Masons Cove Rescue Squad as an EMT/B. While Mr. Yates holds numerous certifications and has completed multiple hours of training, he has not completed the Firefighter 1 program. Roanoke County has offered nine annual fire academies since 2001 and there have been three fire academies offered in Montgomery County since 2007. Roanoke County's policy requires all volunteer fire members to become Firefighter 1 certified within 18 months of acceptance to follow the National Fire Protection Association (I\IFPA) guidelines. This policy was created in 1985 by the Volunteer Fire Chiefs Board so that the citizens of the County would have skilled and trained personnel responding to fire calls, while limiting the liability for the volunteer fire companies and the County. FISCAL IMPACT: Currently, the VIP program has budgeted $1 50,000 to be divided among the VIP eligible volunteers each year. Since the program's inception, approximately 250 eligible volunteers have submitted point records each year. If an exception were to be made for non - certified volunteers, that would open the door for another approximate 78 non - certified volunteers to seek payment ultimately reducing the amount paid out per person. AUrERNATIVES: 1. Make no changes to the VIP program, continue to allow the VIP Board of Trustees the latitude to approve exceptions and not approve payment to Mr. Yates until he meets requirements of the VIP program. 2. Change the VIP program to not require the minimum Firefighter 1 certification and minimum EMT /Basic certification which would effectively reduce quality of service and standard of care for the citizens of Roanoke County. Page 2 of 3 3. Make an exception and approve Mr. Yates be paid $500 for - the 2010 VIP payment. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: While the VIP Board of Trustees Values Mr. Yates' contributions and dedicated years of service, the VIP Board has Voted to recommend alternative number 1- Make no changes to the VIP program, continue to allow the VIP Board of Trustees the latitude to approve exceptions and not approve payment to Mr. Yates until he meets requirements of the VIP program. Page 3 of 3 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F -1 -2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROAI`4OKE COUNTY ADNIIIIIISTRATION CEIIITER MEETING DA7rE March 22, 2011 AGENDA ITEM Requests for public hearing and first reading for rezoning ordinances; consent agenda SUBMITTED BY : Philip Thompson Deputy Director of Planning APPROVED BY : B. Clayton Goodman III Count y Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS BACKGROUND The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of - the requested zoning actions; rather, approval sa'tis'fies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for April 28 2011. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1. The petition of Kenneth J. and Linda J. Lapiejko to obtain a Special Use Permit in a R -1, Low Density Residential, District to operate a private stable on 44.5 acres, located at 3525 Harborwood Road, Catawba Magisterial District. 2. The petition of Douglas R. and Mary E. McCallum to obtain a Special Use Permit in an AG -1, Agricultural /Rural Low Density, District to operate a small wind energy system on 2.414 acres, located at 4824 Wade Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. Maps are attached. More detailed information is available in the Clerk's Office. Page 1 of 2 STAFF R ECOII11 M EN DA7rION : Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for April 26, 2011 2. That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Item(s) 1 -2 , and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Page 2 of 2 County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 B ermrd Drive P 0 Box 29800 Roanoke, VA. 24018-0798 (540) 772 -2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 ALL APPLICANTS For Staff Use O Date received: Application fee: Placards issued: Case Number f'z - i A 13a ay"-1 Check type of application filed (check all that apply) ❑ Rezoning ASpeclial Use ❑ Variance ❑ waiver ❑ Administrative Appeal El Comp Plan (15.2 - 2232) Re view . . ............ . ... .......... Owner "s name /address wlzip REM Property Location Magisterial District: 0 wy e co SA41E i Plann area: �' �, ® .woo b o bs Cv mm un ty g Ct V A (C Tax Map No.: i s L , 0" ft IF 0 1 ® 4 . �� 0C� Existing Zoning°` t A L.0 I Size of parcel(s): Acres: 44. *(Z,�s Existing Land Use: L � L REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (I5.2- 2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (I2/S/Vd /CP) Proposed Zoning: KI WI t($k Pjam Proposed Land Use: SimaLL F91ntLV Aomf. UJA PRIVA4 51 AJLL Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes X No D IF NO, A. VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes Y1 No Di IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes D No E RIANC `, WAIVER AND AD INISTRA T'.�VE APPEAL APPLICANTS (1VIWI ) Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to; Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Sections): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of interpretation of Zoning Map to Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed, APPLICATION WILL NOT DE ACCEPTED IF ANY of THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. RISIw1CP VIAA RIS/W /CP VIAA RIS/W /CP VIAA Consultation 8 112" x I I" concept plan Application fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification water and se er application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the prop pr the er's e co ct p rc er and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature 2 Phone #: Work: Fax No. #: TIFICATI R 1� P� I I I ' PER MT R R u' I'I 1' � "' i . ........... iri�i ( 3 .... .... .... . 1 ::.:.::::. ............. ...... . ......... . . 1�I�` Applicant IeCMI)4 CT A� D LI PJ D 0 Jr Lft P C " The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2 -2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. 7 4 p tie Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. j 4,; LJ' V Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water /sewer, roads, schools, parks /recreation and fire and rescue. T 6 1 01 1.-)1 -5 C 1 CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the propdsed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In. such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2 -2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS a. Applicant name and name of development b. Date, scale and north arrow c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoi ing properties e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplair, etc. f The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties . g. All property lines and easements h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development j . Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site 1. Any driveways, entrances /exits, curb openings and crossovers m. Topography reap in a suitable scale and contour intervals n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed A q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required,,in toe checklist above are complete. { Signature of applicant Dafe 6' v F Cl A Communit Development Plannin & Zonin Division Z 0 1 3 NOTICE To APPLICANTS FOR ]REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke Count Plannin Commission reserves the ri to continue a Rezonin Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearin If it is the opinion of the majorit of the Plannin Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearin that sufficient time was not available for plannin staff and/or an outside referral a to ade evaluate and provide written comments and su on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearin then the Plannin Commission ma vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessar reviewin parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and su to be *included in a written memorandum b plannin staff to the Plannin Commission. The Plannin Commission shall consult with plannin staff to determine if a continuance ma be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke Count Plannin Commission reserves the ri to continue a Rezonin Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the Count Traffic En or staff from the Vir Department of Transportation re further traffic anal and/or a traffic impact stud that would be beneficial in makin a land use decision (Note: a list cif potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further stud is provided as part of this application packa This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessar reviewin parties to evaluate the re traffic anal and/or traffic 'impact stud and to provide written comments and/or su gg estions to the plannin staff and the Plannin Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newl scheduled public hearin date. Effective date; April f9,, 2005 01 01 V sane of Petition et tionees, Si re Ditto 8 Special Use Permit Application - 3525 Harborwood Road 065.00 -01 -62.02 -0000 (RI) (Y) 3525 Harborwood Road 065.00 -01 -63.00 -0000 (RI) (Y) 0 Harborwood Road 065.00 -01 -62.00 -0000 (R1) (Y) 3499 Harborwood Road Kenneth J and Linda J Lapiejko 1715 Peoples Creek Road Advance, NC 27006 9 PropLyly Owners w110 g0joining varceILLzoningjand 0 land use 065.00 -01- 65.00 -0000 (AG3) (Y) 3675 Harborwood Road Gorman R and Mary Jane Howell 3675 Harborwood Road Salem, VA 24153 065.00 -01- 64.00 -0000 (R1) (N) 3543 Harborwood Road 065.00 -02- 17.00 -0000 (R1) (Y) 3757 Harborwood Road 065.00 -02- 13.00 -0000 (R1) (Y) 065.00 -01- 58.00 -0000 (Rl) (Y) 0 Harborwood Road 065.00 -01- 57.00 -0000 (R1) (I) 0 Harborwood Road 065.00 -01- 60.01 -0000 (R1) (N) 3397 Harborwood Road 065.00 -0 1- 60.00 -0000 (R1) (N) 3405 Harborwood Road 065.00 -01 -61.00 -0000 (R1) (N) 3435 Harborwood Road 065.00 -0 1- 62.01 -0000 (R1) (1V) 3497 Harborwood Road Robin Dale and Nancy Ann Wertz 3543 Harborwood Road Salem, VA 24153 John w and Jane M Cannon 3757 Harborwood Road Salem, VA 24153 John A Cross Jr. Residuary Trust 154 Taylor Avenue Salem, VA 24153 Betty Jones Rice 4046 High Point Road Elliott City, MD 21042 Anthony L and Ann Reynolds 3397 Harborwood Road Salem, VA 24153 Jacqueline P Reynolds 3405 Harborwood Road Salem, VA 24153 Ivan B and Denise P Sexton 3435 Harborwood Road Salem, VA 24153 Larry Ray Spencer 3497 Harborwood Road Salem, VA 24153 I Special Use Permit Application - 3525 Harborwood Road 8 Prope!:11 Owners across Harborwood Road: 065.00 -01- 31.08 -0000 (RI) (N) 3542 Harborwood Road Jason M and Kelly P Paxton 3542 Harborwood Road Salem, VA 24153 065.00-01-3 1.01 -0000 (RI) (Y) 0 Harborwood Road 065.00 -01- 31.07 -0000 (RI) (N) 3524 Harborwood Road 065.00 -01- 31.02 -0000 (R1) (N) 3496 Harborwood Road 065.00 -01- 31.06 -0000 (RI) (N) 3490 Harborwood Road 065.00 -01- 31.03 -0000 (Rl) (N) 3456 Harborwood Road 065.00-01-32.00-0000 (Rl) (N) 3448 Harborwood Road 065.00 -01- 33.00 -0000 (R1) (N) 3446 Harborwood Road 065.00- 01- 57.01-0000 (xi) Grp 0 Harborwood Road Terry M and Joanne L Hines 3586 Harborwood Road Salem, VA 24153 Don R and Deborah T Browning 3524 Harborwood Road Salem, VA 24153 Edward w and Judy D Johnson 3496 Harborwood Road Salem., VA 24153 Samuel C and Sandra Mtcassell 3490 Harborwood Road Salem, VA 24153 Dale M and Angela D Israel 3456 Harborwood Road Salem, VA 24153 Susan J Brown 3448 Harborwood Road Salem, VA 24153 Frank E and Judith T Miller 3446 Harborwood Road Salem, VA 24153 Cemetery 0) qvlp —1 (C) LO C) C) CD C) C) C) C) C) C ) C) C) C) C) C) C) I C) C) C) 0 L6 C) C) C) I CO to I C) I C) C) C) C! qr C4 C) C) C) a co C) co I (Y) Tom C) 0 cl C) C) C) C) C) C) I Q C) 0 TOM C) C) C) CD Q C) CD L6 F cli me LO C) C) 184 1 m CD CV (D CD CD C) q CD CD C> -D to C) C) 0 C) L6 C) C\i C) C) (D C) C) C) 0 % Q I C) ft (D CD r C) C) N . C> C) (0 C) C) 0 0-7 P — IQ LO CD C) T m (D I (D D csi ui CD to CD (.0 U) CD C:) C) CD CD kr � CD 1 0 CD CD CD LO CD CD op C) 1 Cam, (D C) I C) C) C) C) C) LO C ! LO Rem CD (0 C) C) C; (0 C) C) C) C) pe ,Now d-W 4MOO C) C) C) C) U) C) L6 C) CD C) (D C) r C-4 C> CD C) U-) C) C) C) C) 4*ft 61% CD I CD CD U-) CD C) cq (D Opp % I tow ft-0 0-0 *we afts W-w- PMR- M- 00 CD C) C) C) CD A4 KO%S IE ghms . 4- Fit 14 c 1E 40 lielAiS E 12RUfftlEb SRO 0 C . - -- Go C) CO U-) C) L rll-_ I (D C) CaD 40 L6 C 4 C4 lqrm (D C) 4*ft 61% CD I CD CD U-) CD C) cq (D Opp % I tow ft-0 0-0 *we afts W-w- PMR- M- 00 CD C) C) C) CD A4 KO%S IE ghms . 4- Fit 14 c 1E 40 lielAiS E 12RUfftlEb SRO 2 0 Q (6 TM 01, 0 C7 L rll-_ C) C� C) 2 0 Q (6 TM 01, cr- < 0 LL Z z0 0 ie Lo m < z < W < W D C;d cc: 4( ck z o Z a3 LJJ LLI V) C1\j < W (16 0 z Y- 0 (N t 4 D 0 A z LLJ U- 0 Q z Lkj 0 Z C4 L Lu r" < n Z 0 < > Q 0 U z ry 0 0 Ln A LIJ ry >- N,Q Z 0- t-- 2 < LU (E) V) Li LAI uj Ln C5 L) 1- �- 1 LLJ L1. .0 < A" . 0 �ri u - �n,(o _ cn Z C4 (05 1 P7 rL to5< < 1 af cq 0 8 m lo �- < in U Qf rn 0 40 cn n Lj Z 0 U- W 0 C.) `4 o (X z a aim L - L - C� z LLJ Wu wow is LL) z W (L < M cc 2 z- 25 M LLJ JLZW z C MWLLI > < Ld R U < (D z Uo 0 o < I-- ckf I ix co p 0 LLJ pq 0 V) a - - p 0 z X z wow < to 0 LjD -j LL , 3.- CL I F- (L U'l ze: -5 ko LLJ z z Qzz (n u x Ohl 3r 0 FL �- cr 6 !A LO x z LJ 4. CL V) 1 ISO co ko a] lik IL a 0 F- 00 1 " LU uj LAJ W 9z (n V) N as C14 �o (k: cx owl; ai L.LJ As -(V J � vo Q a_ V1 - C14 < j- r Q C,4 AP PROXIMATE I z (n LOCA1 C a) s FI ELD x I CL z EF z I L acz) <6 CD C3 C> EL LU 0 V; t2 (OZ- D C! - CL F3 L C14 0 =) 0 V1 N to to 0 (14 0 co . Ir I 11 -50: 45 — 0 (L z A' (r- m ren I-Cl- "O 'El CL Z >c a i >- Z < 6 CL C3 Ix < 0� .-j 0 L A W le 6�- z LZ U- -40 NVI(18311 Z -C-4 9twis k oI (-) U 9, 0 z Z - LLJ < z K Z :3 - t -j c I-- IS LL, M cr- r-: -i ic U 0 < Q 0 0 W LL. UJ < V) < 0 A., cr A LLJ < LLJ 110 11 R (.) Oil 0 Lj 0 4 Dd 0 k A ZR9 'El' NOLV-) 09 < u ct: z I.- : (A < u U) C3 Ld co 6 , Z Z p r E CD 7 (E):Z:n z C OC) m L < L- — 9 V) I-- c LJ z L,: LLJ OL) C) V' r ' Er LLJ 0 Q 03 ors C 1 3 LLJ Z D Y LLJ LL OL w W U) 3: >- 2 : 1 (D CL W U-) r4 to as CL W tq 0 Ix z x - Ln 0 0 a- In CN 0 0 (jo CO 0 a. x Lu ui (D 9 � co < z x cp < C:) (A cu 1co CD 0: It W w a ce- 0 LL- C) LLJ 4Ln W a) tj rr z W U6 W U: Ln C13 1 W LLI 1 17 3: Z -C-4 9twis k oI (-) U S - LLJ < z K Z :3 - t -j c I-- IS LL, M cr- r-: -i ic U 0 < Q 0 0 W LL. 3 tn 0 (D -j rr m z - > ( Li z _j LU A., cr A LLJ < LLJ 110 11 R (.) Oil 0 Lj 0 4 Dd 0 k A ZR9 'El' NOLV-) 09 --i WOO I n '—x 3: W 1A M cr- r-: -i ic U 0 < Q A., cr A LLJ < F-- ),- C3 C\j 6 , Z Z p LO Z z C ev >- UJ 0 w V' r ' C13 z 03 ors I-- a- .1 LL (Y- C� Uj LAJ < M FS 0 le L) to Ckf a) x m i n ui D z C) < vi Uj X CD 0: It W w a ce- 0 LL- C) LLJ 4Ln a) < cu W 0 C) W C� UJ Z "o X C) < CY LLI M LA _ (A F- X C7 j (DZ 0 0 (y uj CD E n W M 0 r 0 —7 Ul L5 < LL. v LL. W C C n 0 :; — x V) U.J W a_ 4%, 0 1 0 C-1 a. V) fr 0 3 CY z C. W 4r, D 0 0200 0 < 06C Od 62CL 9'(3 o Lo 3i W Wu- — 0 > b F- �1-zo-oo All xvi < NOLLVbOdWO 3xenu Z JV Z =� CD Lo Lo < 3NIaORM4 3HI (ez 0 0 2 0 Z L'i Z: W CD z F- < C� < a -40 LL- A183dOdd Ex r ---- - - - - I �1 a I� OW GUMS d k �g A r� t; r (7i --wpm= mmmommmor LLJ U ca 10t_� ��� V) �- z o cc) •r �n c� oq rt to n f! . - mot' K! 0 N I W w u) , tto MW) fq v. - *'t't to x¢ 4 < ° LL_ LL7J ¢o Q v Z c� -t acnrnr4tno(arnu�cot -a �� LL. � � w � ° v�Q C7 cn Z COtr10oDuQt. � N �`0NtD0 � � O A � 8N c6ci tgd1Lr)Nc4N�O p Qp 0 �] F � ` z © O g to rnrnrnc tots --LQ l�oG? ZN CI3 d p tl � � r- I z ��tr'tLI) tvtntnt - )U')0 ntn ¢ • �ac�z Q � m w� <vx ffi *- ry r� tt to to r• oa ar ' "? � w z = +d r' y N 0 m: 0 4j o4 � C W " C] r 12 '° = pi s CD *�-* onw w DOW z, o ( �z 48 S��0OIj 3z to 11 �W�Q a t"' t O � ��¢a °ya�� nM . Z z (i 0 =w { Z) -fir (A R O F- D Z Q � 4c Ix W 00 C� N J r Ui Z (y u4 Z Z U a Z U ❑ fil z }� to W U z p z Ld in o� w C: >_ >_F Q U � z n CLD � tai '< Iw Q Q to ,cC =) �X y»a�� t: U) Q�til" [1Q RY-M�, 3d R .(tgCG 0 R '-x yam ❑41 �i ��CQ�R[� w �EDM a LL. w F- R w (0 N C1'_ tai Lu pdZ � LdL) c jMC -4 7 z_' d cr- Ad C] J L(al. _ 0. N bi Cc 2us x -w❑ a° Qom }aiV¢f?� a¢�€� -W wG¢ N M(X— <ZWZMO p� ❑ © �D4#¢ tic =z�Q z)" (jip a E ms - (n oO(n -z-n'2 oa)o C3 k- wF+�Z � -Z �wl.i -t om o � --�-ca 5 o'zf Q :E "J�i0va�t°v �ozaa_¢°- <w_ °ztn2 W °�- a� Q¢ Q = ©MZZ�W -cn U)I=WI W > IaJR4❑mQ 0 (0 Vfl. UF �w €,LJ �V�C}Z OCi�LC �- i�» �1 ► " - . w ,t3 zoo �} uyQw�rn©tnU_N0 p ug LL. i p �¢ L�]QtDd , -�<, 7t"? t7vC]0 Clwum ti7 � 4 C C wt QUO Zo— Y4 z© ILOC]'Qd -j [7L¢ pQ�� © ¢ L 4 .p Qa Q<0< L, Q� Q � w z 0 n < cn O jEo Ft 10 �� W Z � 050 40 U ❑ La X W 9 5 mr., z w w ,� _Z¢ ¢ w x MZ0 �wao ❑¢ aa�— Q € r, a) L d a �¢~" ow'� 5 or Z 11 7 �5 LLJ< _© L? Rte _j 0 Z�W p 0L0 Y ❑ RZOG Q3t�o �p ti �z m SQLp3mpm �P Z oo� _ ❑�� z� ( R ; � — w IL m° arnaZtn Q 0� € C? F ¢ ts`! X I— P d t.3 !iC tti1 z 0 Q v, w OC 0: 4 �� � ti7Z FjL Qom.- d d ��(_)w �w r K) �- •-- ►- (0 rn t~ V) w o w i o D ❑ ❑ v ..w �w�w di 04 0 ¢00 �N i Z �`"woz _Uw0 ¢ ° U it 1 t' ¢cn to �' €Q D =o ; � o R p z ¢�. ��j w - I �c w t w . � L � X ar Q p0 f= =) QVS Q W U ~ � t aT] U? r � � p z � ta,i (n � � >_ ❑w Q �¢ `'' CQ Z ��o LLJ zCcncd� . 4 z wp W n- voce t� wa °o t <wo4 © c oc Y � °� U Q v �o wZ 2 �� F-- ��t vicn 4 �►�`'` ¢ c 3, LLJ WZO ac sc nc t.� O ZQOM Q o w w CL<cLg C7¢ M. r =� l�iE ~ �[LxJ R V% W ¢L Z .� z Q(x z t.1❑ 0 € �I t.i ❑ �ZU�[I.R N 4U z W xc`''.,mQ ;°Z`'' v¢ rpncin a € �� a. �°waU va s ' o r - [� w° Vy �-- v t: i ,� ts, z Q I z w x �` 0 aC w z w Y a. p o Q U F .- x x 2 [ w Ac p w A+ wp-- �a �Q4N 0 w_ A o , 5 w w p 4 G,t Q. M !" I h- � ti L} = Q [� w `a°D3�'u © -ccc o =o� S 0 �0F ©� W o �0F �m 5 "� W �� U � U V) 1 6 - � r 0[w�}- �wrar`n arOE°QOj�� `�' m .� Y yp7 w w acv LL) < _ J J Q m— m d w st n p w ]C ri Ee. G7 ❑ R 0 p !t1 i w x �tri d� -� zap � a Z (L i�sacUO Q- x z_� wWRui °d Z zQ �, aC41 U Q ¢ n mac CL Q z�ui ' CL 0L cc LLJ ]C ❑ Q t,i ❑ U Z m Q 4 7 m U/ 0 Q (n Q Ln << LLJ - .. . ppQQ i,F -., : ° t " a h '° 'r► r °5 � .. _ J �J` ° F % !"" - Y .a� C d_., , ° '. ➢ w',.'� 4 �'. ?.: lvi ,.. � ,. u 1 V �'. - -y e n n„ F. —7. -- - � n A P a• , a �F� 4 n yy �I Y w I .r .➢. ��..�- -'�q -, �' `, �_ 1 ', .. .. ,�, - � r .., ,. � a ti', , F ' I m � t a ' -. ➢, ':`. •'r } P"'� + ° �e Yt •7�4 -.. - 1 ... n ,;' -�,. ..� . ' _ ..' :,... ''_ 4.. ' °•: nM �y" �' � ym ,� " �. ,, . a k �' �' � a'_or� _'.. - u' _= A"'^ ®.�➢a•�tr: r � n,'r � .a � {L . � r r irr..��� A'Y `��'•�. °etn � 'd el '4'� A - - ,,- � - .. � J'y. �.' i^ - ri � .n. " � W, y y � a. Iv Applicants Name: Roanoke County N Existing Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Department of Tax Map Number: Community Development Magisterial Distric Kenneth J & Linda J Lapiejko R1 R1S 065.00 -01- 62.00, .02, -63 t: Catawba Area: 44.5 Acres 2 February, 2011 Scale: 1 " = 400' Site I Land Use Conservation Rural Preserve Rural Village Village Center Development Neighborhood Conservation Transition Co re Principal Industrial Suburban Village (new category) Economic Opportunity (new category) 1110 1110 1110 1110 Applicants Name: Kenneth J & Linda J Lapiejko N Existing Zoning: R 1 Roanoke County Department of Proposed Zoning: R1 S _ Tax Map Number. . 065.00-01-62. 00, .02, 63 Community Development Magisterial District: Catawba Area: 44.5 Acres 2 February, 2011 Scale: 1 " = 400' County of Roanoke For Staff Use Onl y 0 Q 409 Com munity Developm Date receive j Received by: Planning & Zoning Application fee: PCBZA date: 5204 B ernard Driv / %. P �►oX 29800 .1 Placards issued:. l3 date. Roanoke VA 24� 18 -0798 � (540) 772 -2065 FAX (540) 776 -7155 Case Number A ) I k ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) 0 Rezoning Rlpecial Use ❑ Va 0 Wa iver 0 Ad m i nistr a tiv e Appeal 0 Comp Plan (15.2 -2232) Revi Applicants name /address whip hone. E yo 77'1 (O► a r G. - �.+� a r Work: '� � 0 32r? - - ' g Zq V932Lf d. Cell #: 5-9 -- -22 R o eLno k e VA X 4 0 1 Fax No. Owner's name/address whip Phone #: Work: Fax No. ##: Property Location Magisterial District: IX r ` Community Planning area: O ack Creec Tax Map No. : - Y " 72,, �,'+� -+� - , 0 E xi sting Zoning: Size of parcels): Acres: ? . L f Iif � Existing Land Ilse: AA e- e REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN ( RE VIEW APPLICANTS (RJS/W/CP) Proposed Zoning- 1 Proposed Land Use: 1 tj 4 1 n e. r ire m Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, wi dth, and frontage requirement of the requested d istrict? Yes C No ❑ IF N0 A 'VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? 'Y'es No 0 IF N0 A 'VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes 11 No 11 VARIAN W AIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (VIII A) Variance Waiver of Section(s) 1 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Sections): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT DE ACCEPTED IF ff THESE ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. Rfs /CP V/AA R/SfW/CP v /AA RISM v /AA FEB S/ Consultation 8 112 "' x I I" concept plan A.pplica fee ] App, Metes and bounds description Proffers p ' lica 7 , �� , pP l� p , e . fi . < r Justification Water and sewer application A.djoinin erty, owners ITY I hereby certify that I any either the ownei the property or the owner's went or contract purchaser and a i acting Zvi iowt6d e ati &r of the owner. it eO 1 +G Owner's r 04 JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2 -2232) REVIEW REQUESTS Applicant NS6 Z " 4 r The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2 - 2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. P14-0 � e- r Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. lecs-e- 'Se e'd Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water /sewer, roads, schools, parks /recreation and fire and rescue. f S Community Development Planning & Zoning Division POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND /OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic- generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County Transportation Engineering Manager, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and I /DOT reserve the right to request a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary.) High Traffic- Generating Land Uses: • Single- family residential subdivisions, Multi - family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units • Restaurant (with or without drive- through windows) • Gas station/Convenience store/Ca r wash • Retail shop/Shopping center • offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) • Regional public facilities • Educational/Recreational facilities • Religious assemblies • Hotel /Motel • Golf course • Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic • Industrial site/Factory • Day care center • Bank • Non - specific use requests Road Network Situations: • Development adjacent to/with access onto /within Soo -ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc) • For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and /or roadway conditions have changed significantly • When required to evaluate access issues • Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six -Yr Road Plan, etc.) • Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem • Development would potentially negatively impact existing/ planned traffic signal(s) • Substantial departure from the Community Plan • Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day Community Development Planning & Zoning Division 9 9 1 3& NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR ]REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING CommissioN APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision waiver, Public Street waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND /OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision waiver, Public Street waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Transportation Engineering Manager or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note.- a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Effective Date: April 19, 2045 Name of Petition At. % t4 4g*<ae Petitioner's Signatur e t 2 " 0 ( I ate February 4"', 2011 Dear Planning Commission Members: We are applying for a special use permit to install a small wind energy system on our property. We would like to install a Bergey 10kw wind turbine that will be mounted on a 100ft lattice tower. This wind turbine uses a three - bladed propeller, 23 feet in diameter, and has only 2 moving parts. It does not generate power until the wind speed reaches at least 8 mph. On calm, quiet days the wind turbine will not rotate. When the rotor is turning, the sound of the wind passing over the blades should not be audible above the noise of the wind in the leaves of the trees. This modern, non - polluting system will generate electricity solely for our own use, reducing our dependence on the local utility. We intend to enter into a net metering agreement with AEP, meaning any excess generation will be supplied to the utility system; but we will not receive any income from this exchange. (Please see attached letter to AEP and the Virginia Net Energy Metering Service Package provided by them.) This system will conform to the county's small wind energy ordinances. The tower type and color will be as specified. The ground clearance, safety, and noise will all be within the limits set forth in the ordinance. The reason we are requesting a special use permit are twofold. We would like to have the tower be 1 00f tall based on the manufacturer's recommendation. (Please see attached Bergey document about tower height.) We would also like to place the tower closer to our own participating property line. Every lot is different based on shape and topography, so ideal turbine placement varies greatly. Quoting the American wind Energy Association. "A tall tower is the single most important factor in the economic viability of a small wind system. Tall towers enable turbines to access faster and better quality winds, and even small increases in wind speed translate to exponentially more energy the turbine can generate. In other words, a taller tower means far more -- and cheaper - energy. The best sites for turbines are those where the wind is least obstructed, which is often the highest point on a property." Our installer recommended the proposed site based on the fact that the wind funnels through our property between distant mountains. At this location the winds are the strongest. It is the ideal location for this reason. we are oply asking for a reduction in the side setback. All other setbacks would conform to those specified in the ordinance. we own the adjacent property. we would like to keep it as a separate lot to retain its value. It is a valuable lot because it is small and because it has a great view. we do not plan on selling this piece of property; however, any future buyer would only purchase it if they supported the presence of the small wind energy system. The set back from the side property line would be 3 -6 feet. We have been approved b the Vir Dept. of Ener Mines, and Minerals for a small wind rebate. This pro is bein administered b Vir Center for Wind Ener at JMU. The have selected turbines that have a proven histor of reliabilit and have chosen q ualified installers. The are g oin g to oversee all approved projects. There are onl sevent participants in the whole state. Ri now an amazin opportunit exists which is extremel time sensitive. There are both state and federal pro which combined can pa over one half of this proposed project. The state pro re a project be started b earl this sprin 2011. Estimated numbers for our project include: Total cost $75494.95 Federal Tax Credit $22648.48 DNUVIE State Rebate $ 15000.00 Final Cost $37846.46 Windmills have lon pla a part in individual American's ener independence. Given modern technolo the are safer, q uieter, and more efficient than ever. As Roanoke count residents, we are happ to take positive steps to make clean renewable ener a realit We are ver willin to have our pro be a test case for the count so ever (Count off icialls, nei school children, interested residents) can learn more about small wind s We feel this pro fulfills the followin purpose and intent of the new small wind ordinance. Purpose and Intent: The purpose of this section is to re the placement, construction, and modification of small wind ener s while promotin the safe, effective and efficient use of small wind ener s and not unreasonabl interferin with the devel of independent renewable ener sources. The re set, orth in this section shall g overn the sitin of small wind ener s used to g enerate electricit or perform work which ma be connected to the utilit g rid pursuant to Vir net meterin laws or serve as an independent source of ener Thank y ou, demk P & Mar and Dou McCallum 774-3062 mar 4824 Wade Rd. Roanoke, VA 24018 "The zoning regulations and districts set forth in this ordinance are for the general purpose of implementing the comprehensive plan of Roanoke County. They are designed to achieve the general purposes of promoting the health, safety, and general welfare of the public, and of further accomplishing the objectives of Section 15.2.2200 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. To these ends, this ordinance is designed to give reasonable consideration to each of the following purposes" "Facilitate the creation of a convenient, attractive and harmonious community" Benefits to the community which promote the health, safety, and general welfare of the public are: • Reduced pollutants from traditional forms of energy • Reduced demand on the local electricity grid • Increased local energy independence • Enhanced reliability and power quality of the power grid • Reduced peak power demands • Increased in -state electricity generation • Diversified energy supply portfolio • American green jobs • Increased regional economic growth "Facilitate the provision of adequate police, fire protection, disaster evacuation, civil defense, transportation, water, sewer, flood protection, schools, parks, forests, playgrounds, recreational facilities, airports and other public requirements" Some of the items listed above could be considered civil defense Protect against destruction of, or encroachment upon historic buildings or areas. Protect against one or more of the following: overcrowding of land, undue density of population in relation to the community facilities existing or available, obstruction of light or air, hazards and congestion in travel and transportation, or loss of life, health, or property from fire, flood, panic, or other hazards; The turbine and the tower are engineered to be completely safe. "Encourage economic development activities that provide desirable employment and enlarge the tax base" The turbine to be installed is an American made Bergey turbine. The installer, the materials, and equipment used to erect the turbine will all be from the local area. "Provide for the preservation of agricultural and forestall lands." "Protect approach slopes and other safety areas of licensed airports" "Protect surface and groundwater resources" The turbine and tower will not harm any agricultural, forestall lands, airport approaches, surface, and groundwater resources. "The AG-1, agricultural/rural low density district consists of land primarily used as farmland, woodlands, and scattered residential development located within the rural service area." "The purpose of this district is to encourage these areas to remain in their rural state, and protect sensitive and unique land resources from degradation, consistent with the recommendations of the comprehensive plan for the rural preserve areas." This use would be consistent with the purposes stated above for the AG-1 district. It would be far less disturbing to the surrounding area than many of the uses that are permitted by right. CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST .. .. ... ........ _ ................ A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15,2 - -2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS a. Applicant name and name of development b. Date, scale and north arrow c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. r/ f. The nin and l use of 1 n r zo g and al adjacent t p operties g. All property lines and easements h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights L Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional infoi matron required for REZONING and SPECL4L USE PERMIT APPLICANTS k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site 1. An driveways, curb openings and crossovers Y s Y> m. Topography in a suitable scale and contour intervals map n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections N o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule 1 certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. Af 1 -2,1 Signature of applicant at � � M � I I IXI ZI O~ * tz M I l ium r - 9 v - Cc � �f ee? Aw _ I IA m ` IL41N r & I wry �. � .w w w� .► w 4 N A jj IN q ISQ a _ I to Ara I 4 I • * ; I oo I i 4/ 0 it - I ti I I I I M1 S:� 03 C) Q ca az SF 40, A�7 ALI. 11 -0. _. ., .. . 1. as Or ®rk 40 TT CU jo i A cl so AV 00 0 O.1"e /0 c afi on Preserve, I- TR MR927 WINDPOWER 2200 INDUSTRIAL BLVD. NORMAN, OK 73069 USA T: 405-364-4212 F: 405-364-2078 E-MAIL: mbergey(d),bergey.com WEB: www.bergey.com Wh Short Towers are Ver Bad for Small Wind Turbines The smooth flow of the wind over the land is interrupted b obstructions and topo variations. These interruptions brin about two important phenomena: wind shear and turbulence. Wind shear describes the fact that close to the g round the wind is slowed down b friction and the influence of obstacles. Thus, wind speed is low close to the g round and increases with increasin hei above the g round. Wind shear is more pronounced over rou terrain and less pronounced over smooth terrain. Turbulence is essentiall rou air caused b the wind passin over obstructions such as trees, buildin or terrain features. Turbulent air reduces ener output because it diminishes the effectiveness of the Wind Shear The chan in horizontal wind speed with hei A function of wind speed, surface rou ( ma y var with wind direction and atmospheric stabilit ( chan g es from da to ni Wind shear exponents are hi at low wind speeds, above rou surfaces, and durin stable conditions T exponent (u,) values: .10 - .15: water/beach + .15 - .25: g entl y rollin farmland *:. .25 -.40+- forests/mountains 11 7.8 ml's C Z 40 m V Z 1 = T 25 rn Wind Shear Profile oc = - Lo g , 0 1V'N1 I V'_ = V1(Z2/Z1Yt Lo [Z_,/Z Graphic courtes of AWS Scientific aerod of the rotor blades. Turbulence also puts g reater strain on the wind turbine because it increases vibration. 1 Turbulence Turbulence cuts performance b reducin the effectiveness of the �._ blades The effects of both wind shear and turbulence diminish with hei and can be lar overcome simpl b puttin the machine sufficientl hi above the g round. This ma be accomplished b puttin the machine on the hi possible g round and on the hi feasible tower. As a minimum, the machine should be at least 12 meters (40 feet above an obstructions within 100 meters (330 feet) in the prevailin wind direction, and preferabl in all directions. Even in perfectl flat areas, we recommend that the tower be at least 24 meters (80 feet hi for an 10 kW BWC Excel-S wind turbine installation and 18 meters ( 60 feet for the 1 kW BWC XL.1. In areas with trees, please bear in mind that trees g row and the tower hei needs to be based on the mature hei of trees in the vicinit Further, the power in the wind increases as the cube of the wind velocit (i.e., doublin wind speed increases power b a factor of ei 2 x 2 x 2 8 Therefore, small increases in avera wind speed will result in si increases in lon ener output. Table 1 below shows the influence that tower hei can have on annual ener output for the BWC Excel-S wind turbine at a t inland site. VIA Approachin Reversed Flow Redevelopin Wind Pfolile On Top Of Obstruction Wind Profile Tower Height wind speed at Annual (ft) Top of Tower Energy ( m1ph Out ut kwh 60 11.2 g 600 80 12.0 1 500 100 12.6 13 120 13.3 144 700 Table 1: Variation in wind speed and expected annual energy output with tower height. The Bottom Line: Putting a wind turbine on a short tower is like putting a solar system in the shade! Tower heights for the 10 kw Bwc Excel -s can range from 80 - 140 feet and most installations use the 100 ft. or 120 ft. towers. The FAA does not require the approval of towers under 200 feet unless they are in close proximity to an active airport runway. The need to obtain FAA permission (known as a "determination ") is triggered in this case if the tower punctures a slope of either 50:1 or 100: 1, depending on the runway length, taken from the nearest point on the airport runway. For example, for a runway over 3,500 ft in length a 100 ft. (112 ft. to tip of blade) tower would need to be closer than 11,200 ft from the runway to require FAA approval. This situation has arisen about a dozen times over the last 25 years for Bwc installations and the FAA has granted permission in every case, N Carol R. Huffman, C.E.M. Customer Services Appalachian Power Company 802 River Avenue P.O. Box 2021 Roanoke, Virginia 24022 February 4, 2011 Dear Carol Huffman, Thank you for speaking with me and sending the Virginia Net Energy Metering Service Package. As l mentioned we plan to install a 1OKw wind turbine. we would like to tie it into the grid using the requirements provided by AEP. we understand that AEP will provide us with a new meter that measures flow in both directions and that you will initially inspect the system. We also understand that we must inform AEP of any changes including if the system is taken off line. we understand AEP may inspect the system at anytime to be sure it fits the guidelines set out in the Virginia Net Energy Metering Service Package. Thank you, Doug and Mary McCallum 4824 Wade Rd. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 VA Net Metering Subject: VA Net Metering From: crhuffman @aep.com Date: Tue, 01 Feb 201109.10.00 -0500 To: marv.mccallum@verizon.net Carol R. Huffman, C.E.M. Customer Services Appalachian Power Company 802 River Avenue P. 0. Box 2021 Roanoke, Virginia 24022-2121 Phone: 540-427-3653 Fax: 540 -427 -3787 Inside Phone: 300 -3653 application/pdf. Meterin VA Net Package Au 2010,pdf... Content-Encodin base64 1 of 1 2/3/23113:32 PM y' 5w �. '.w'�Y..y��•�• YL _ fir•. , .� .... m:.._.r; .. rrr _.... ........ ..... s� 3� �i' r. rM M .. �..,. .,- .-. �,.. rte, Y �� >. � • - Y we MP -Apv% lalt.,hian-Po r :. a ;- , �. s WO ..:: W� 'M Net En rai-atliatall.O.Nv.s..Cu.stonle�.S-w".h,e Al e C1 1 9 g i ex.enew 0 r g enerators ntend dt ..-0 e - a or par eir o -ena re lh&t e 0 - M t 11 t of th wn q uir. ments. c to in I w 'M be. 'St. le ., "th their p et in alled tomeasure if, Y , -A speol di ..mi. i it e-bet w-con e iectrici � y the' ais-tomer ec t 01 he custol ner CX put ases:,. d el ti, e .,.: C . U .. S , t 0 n i bAck to'.th Utilit Th mer is: then bi led �o P the "r.-net,toiisum i pfion,, Th parkulars of the. P ro follow.. T 0. OP - 0 aic n.e.. Id t - icWatn n i s a P ho Ov It is OCUMM IS'. I t n.d rovid ents for coramo l 'n t fled dnd wind-turbi'ne s s tems 1 OkW'Or. I.eS8 that ma - q ua.. y fo . 9 t Motoring S . C. . rVI c ex Documellfs..f6rja S tem8i. ma -�be. re e. . Sted fibIA, t (C—r I I t I _ffim A at 540-427.3653.11, et ergy M t Wbioh -ides detailed-I'on foiniat" Enclosed islthe'N Er-n. Service i prov I g ardin -,av "lab'.] *f offfio s . . ` e M re. g ai i i a-vic. har ! dit s-:of-s v c n- d .toci. icai requ . irements. COAK Upproml O connev thw a . f. : O WN �- IS.M II Sammar t.h pro 1*1 -interconn d'on-form." fo ._. th . C. 116 gubmittied -C I. A.. dm , t dner mete 'ng Compan ptii to. iews ion, 'y v at", ri ov fif e proper i 34 Compan con Ot on�site J'mpWfio 's. t 'e -th 'n-Stall ation and .mitinuin -safe oper4tions:of t.he,- 4. -c on y will 116tify cu stoma of app Toval - or dmpprova 07 in erconnection: and provide an applicable co-nditions-, t a S 0, e ate,the g enerator O w i n g e I II of 11- �t s ab v 0 m -in t-h c Stomer a op connected the AE -s h �Iee sa) t I. the (A rose: Som ocume e dwtv, wi /it r&:AM jId dd:a Subject. to chan . av e n I a e. CO lt I l A i th e /a le -� 1 1 1 1 wo tio to ffi. CW iO..Of APPALACHIAN�_POWERCOMPANV -S 2 NIA.. S*CC' TA IF F NOi - 0- SC E ULEN NNI.S. -In 0 CONDITIONSOFS ER A.I.ICE, (Co.n.t a) a -s]: f n- thy . 3. ba s -o the d*.o. oaffloat lon1brximew Me--ftiet OT 0 rs: fth: ed-,�ca paci Vy The-Compan I ll: NAM a at NA a.rat _41i k-MCA 'N. C le. rs W. of 25 K. 6_1 hind With" - 's" �. --(60) �d .6f. 0 0 Catt T 09.� I 0II ..:I.x 'ays. m -date, Of Ofifl a. * r4haw25 1(W 6th I ri.. cop -of. tile- vAll 're No.t. I tu. rn P act 11.411 :41�0- make, a...-dOetmi J'a I etho vause to --- I e a. :� tile T A 41CO-m Within Compa 'S nat nAV the 11 'ttv Contemporancous-:n V-A.!S,CC. -tic- COIU also- provide.`tbe --custonlu wt. Oce-11-At OM e S H I CIT011ne I es a M v If e &CC, The.4.. __ k, - holl 1 : .HI fWfl i� fifil Ilea for NVOIXTrWith f.':VA. Cust t Ct Nvitli'thd llpa.� S it. S ul. J ias Addfe�w-d 111c r- md'if. u."t- 01-- 11wa-tbell C ........... V n 0 At of A! VA, the: VA, S- C. �',C- J -waive WC. S 0 er 0111pl W1 I a Y Con 111011S. us.:_a-res. S : C i h . -.t V, - Cotppn nia detain-A-6 wfieffier. the miom, A- re I h I I ..4k 1W :If. - C _ unterconnecOop vt JU, oi�-wabfe. hbel. g �nera t1i o.mpall �customew_ has:sAtisfied all -4--the -re mients. for re y q uire C MIMS, ia 1w 611_ji�c'!00 C 10 i wq mmpl. MAW. 44 -of, TOCTIts. or n rn nc 0 er re re f titti"C A b f fo il 0. I miectioll: weet'�'Abt satisfW �Jht-- custom&:sb SU n6th aim i i t Noti i0tion 0 a 'de o, completed 11 work neoessl� to. s tile - ieudeg P rio.-t Ofify 1110- Con �Q.wcc- the imistomor bfts-:- v afi5f Antemonnectioll'i This '1106 filbafion - e shall not re lace su �ro: - p pers ede,- an Other ap N b 1 e - wailthi erlod - or g � p, P CO .r I t re0,11r1e t rt r t 0 il- qu:a i ptt ca �Ofbl NgU14011 et & -b�_wi'thbeldord 9. e Tbe, customer- shall di All maintain ::and.-- - --st I .1 P erlo. le m le Ile renew.'ab. - fe . fbel. g m.-mior . accordance \ tile V" ill - Mallu bl. t d- d J1*0, ct0qmqr'--- Al. 1O.Compall 'at least, a ic d afl I a 6 Ofe. and �Iwj f 0 spep a an. 1-.�pp w pmormance st lip - . ..... Ila -.11" of I dh - i-a Ii .. f fit br sta tI.O. �f�t eteth-04) d l id ''r ibak m.. . . . t..) C re'll C r4tor ej, I U 19, ptoteofi C . ti-I efidif o f -th- y - - .q A' but noviiecessan y imftdlo�:.ali - I - Ui Ot. 1vC___ I pine lit-'settili 01.1 ISCOMIC modification. to. flle'-e e fiom tire. fVSY$t - fil �.eueuwable_ fuef utenera o-tr, he, o tmpan e exclud m temporar .1 is, br ',routine - mai ntenance., Y I g iendlito '41 11�1 t.. - �.C.Ouipjetc tile e -:t1ws au 11 1 C 1011. t" I _tb� V4. 1.6 fu . .. f d pf. ii ii -a. �.' 06 A -- 4( ISPOMICC. 101 ie 6 omer t . t j -e-C-011flec -I, 'i - d --p 'i� C bn..p �O Be .4 - t1or O-P�Ijvv 101 110tif, Ati I Cess o t�c- b v P addiflon, ihe Customer sivill - the m:not A med P Company J i'aid --le er -inn m y Amie. g to- the, rem ynble de e H4Y 4 fe -rd4ted 11 M i ge eraw f 11 r (let I Or-18ft fcrab 0- 46-other,p-erson 40;1_ 111teribbil'"Odl Ovou th 0- r.' 1"70 611, is A. ot trans le r asshmable S Se 1. 1O.CauOf FACILITIES CHARGES ktti it T11 COP - a - C 1-ty -1 . 11 11P 0. 1 d' C shOl- in$ th6 i A0 t tilver er COMWetc.. _ e C rator wt., I f SliAlf o pa 40- ht'C Offi ! Ofe it t h 1418 0019", ` ThemfStollil $50 M P .. I " - tor The --Co shOlt- inspec.t the pmt.olli t ve e Seh"figs - Pf - noij � static, 'inverwr-!conn�qwd wnewabk - fold. Cbil f . - r-Colp ec to : S50't 11fe', . 1 O fiorlothl'te ti h, Tht'ttt�toov- hall his ''Ob P OR PAU 01 _�CAC. P� hafl.p 10 Chaf zs -de, termhicd b Compan Jbir e t ' or The: Custollier -S ay. ilw_compan ad ditional M meter *m . testi are inspect i ans re �be customer, 0 '.28 -2008 Lc-met"I"Ve-411 C. Pursuant to f imal-,Orderl .D' d-N_ vember-17 Ca'se. NOW - P U E 00:8-.00.0.46 APPALACH'JAN.:PONVEk,C- ONIPANY VA., S.,CC,. TARIFF N0,20 SCUE? DULK N!R's.' et: term . Service. . Rider) ( con thwed .,NIONTULVI CHARGE, S Fkst..Revjisjo hi -Eiccotd oce. with the -Statidar ch6dutc.. under x- SOW'. A. - the, eus setryiee Stich A.11 • rmoothl y : l lig s sW b o. I a d tome'r takes. char sha11'be_.base4- on flic,-cu t somer's IwA-wer W14 fllq"�Ale:nel . t tiler 0 -the- gy exc eeds zero, T or O C 9 . In, d, 01C.cus(Oun-or one - h e no n u I Ilia. I In P ..F10 x ~t 0 CU$ In o lszero aUve.(Ud 01. b 11 .0 e t PA .. Y t. r , of t - olo lisation'. �QIIIPHIIY.. qr -i-as.ht- W''ti d 'S i i c The '_.t. trot 6jn reb6v e 00 fto in c i polod. T ene dut I It, 9 per] S a C g enerahon: lVe-Aet, ener fur ji the-Wlliti lie 1 14 the �4fi i.. iod :h 11 b ..n.qled fbr,warded widvredi 'b d- ted:a positive- ener -usa d li rs nie -er re uxtsSive i i .... 0 V _t Adi :AA W Tho Na, 1 sba.11 be define.' 0S eac. S le UnIllbbdi p6d. d bp vm Wtb t1le fi' t to with ti 10 np v !-1461ities n A. folloNvin flie. date of intercon-nection of the -tenewable fuel ' e nerator 41 Cbt I -S . ne j1d ener A�. of A e etefln pi�_ j0d I tfte-_-end-a'N-et1 -forwaTdA01he�ne N.tJV1 rig.. Oil y Wthe ox tent-tha Ahe t -ne elie.r d -nb A.. fi . Vf6 th C.U. ji . t . - flet I :.mete di' a d d --excludo- aowintilAted 0" - lexc�.. 111.�-Cjstonje I CORSWO r. e . Y pprio steel io biltin" eri -d i�red-iU,,0610-f6f td 4d. OpiliedftW th 'N AUte, :1�00' d wa at a n tous-1. et 9.P.P0. .. .. __ . - _. _... -.1 . - . - _ 1. i ) .. U 4(ten� �re of. 'tile C, -stoni. Coln' 11- and1ffie- custome . wr er the tile �t Cr t -be in op.- or..,:after: Jul' 1 2 For. et in CUS101,fler - S 11. e net el.ler, gy "fol- one or more, Net.-_Metertn B iods hat, 7 ref 'M er' .9 Y r th . t Peibids- b- hi *0 th p J . . l 1 2007 2008'' esf rile - _. Jhe*r,06n-re x ti b d er 0 it e -cus 0 pe 10d, For IN --je th g-- P ri g 0 -S be- on 200 9,- the I d. -prior to thQ iid of the Net Meterin 6 c.t. N te. I , . or ' o ffe r 1 wr4l " the co r 11W j .1 -of the Net �Metcrit g - erw TIm p.o�m- pumbas- I . -ell ro f slome stbe. submittod p�iorlo b��.'wi'�n d.T e nt A 'It-be on jlstent� ith: th C6mM1SS1WVSJ. Ules QQVM1111 15 etse J g reeme in.. c s XV1 Q 'R N: . Enc Meter hi (2.0 VAC 315,. 0 W 11 d 10�1 e tile- P Mate . . e 0jilp f&l. Net Mete i P -fl--dk:, Jo 'Aire t it custol I e 6. e _f! I es fit obli -:'th C � - J. _n g ..Oive. U. MY .0 C.. 0 p 4 annuat, shilp. le aye - LTVI ma I f t 16 os .11 elconnectidni LLC.4 pj . a-ahoo : --iAt* W11 Zb p koc .10 nlafg` f py ce hr t1W -AEP 'N Nei i . n Volt, for the".1110st rec c-, ndar, Y ear end i n f t p on- or- beffire -the- ed o eadi , e pt(blishedb the PRONfatkia" N iftor q1e shall make fult: ofti I C::�Clld s: pu tea on i6b At d V.$ of th� -Net. Met0 pedod -0 th d to Q' f ffic. Pik M tkd A11011itor4i i w t. s e ar g Sim es Zo. d -ead avera MR Ne iiet:!eoer transferable,, wid the mfsaonl .1�s t a S' p b tied aov b i i. 'a ell I _�irchasel:a ft i - t h e 01 -0 cr�g t oil- CrI11111a Ion .S wo i ie hip q fl . - elve 6DJ1 At _n f, Ive 11. t ip __0 Y 'K pi. r. 1p. 1011 e Pp- a"Y 'or- !1 _�qe _ S SPECIAUTERMS. AND CONDITIONS. T`i d T -Ytns an Condition of Statid ME IS-...t1bjd thd"Conipan e rVIM S.. S Issued: Decembier 8, 2008: Effe , IV o -r: 2 -8 ctwot, Ott be 00 Pursuant to Fin.0.1 Order WOM-NOO'be- 4-7.2-00 Ci l.s.- O .- N pi P U E.�-2008-a,00040., Fo E, 66 6. fi v ot:�9/06 ACONNECTI N NOTIr AVIT. M WN 0 ,T ETERIN.,Q INTERC A OR ofAinaff0h flockk -Por-ler 1-5- 0 T im I 7RG METE 891 iN��SR.-E,,GU'-!--,ATMS ',`N APPLICANT HEREBY GIVES-NOTICE OFINTENTITO OP. A 0 - NE RAT I NP F section -44.-Ap. -lican 11 , ti p on t:l for"ll Rated Cap aci4rb'i kilowatts: -AC, DC' Inverter Man-afacturer--,tiid'..iM odes ,,... Yes No F n tNAH N , Pf -.2.0f 2 .1. R G r t 8vitl! .4 't 'Excess 005. I forlila-finn. f6r f a ors 91 . A 1 W el y In Oil _ Cell Yatbr. ..Wll�.Oircic: verter hiduction S Fre Hz Number of Oases C (CW'e oil 0110 T11ree. R at d'C it DC A -read K.W.. -0. ap AC pparent X Vft, Nwer factor: AC v 0. mlta pe_rap__.____ Facil -.8chbl" ti ube.,attafhed toJhM. form, .Y. W . 0. and e la mus a. -.1 C=ess:of 2.. KW 'is e e me r n cus e Ala -vvim� �Capa A _'x�* --n6t'. te i tonlov misidtf nelwable filet p City. IT �n msta 1n g . ou Or Oy encoUr*dlb Ohtact the- ele-C' -io u oweom y .. prior: --m I U c a] conmnitment&-to_iho. ect ft -distrib . fi pan ta-m-k' g fioan'i Pf IDJ sa ellon. 4. nd-or Ce - rtirwaW . on Th S- t� bakdM � is listed b UliderAYnters Lal)oratories.w be M compliance with Ufa' 174 t.. yeil Date. Of)" Name-(pr Pbooewumben �C. on -a � lay Q1 - I - C ton ftil" f compli ewiththeconms i Aei' xe' tations, .11 rc Ipt'.0 alic Siods. netzeller M19 9u Utilit SjO08 UNS1. ric_�_b l cml' Is WVAC_5v-31540-1, Otafi D-ate, A . T 'here- Py . c 0.111. Y. �t lat fo the, best, Of-m ded.1 - kXot* -'s d-- 0 provi hi - we I - true an. - corrod. V Si 'ApplicantV. Please: send- this completed form: to: Appah'OltajiTower Atu'tv Carot'Huffi ban- — 16ver Ave* P.O. Box. 2-021 Roanoke- VA 2-4024'2t ... .. . ... ii o DO l m Ow- 57, 1 -------- ..... O'N n On&,& ine Sample, Net nwten_n period means each: successive, 2J, month period bo 9 ,with1he fitst meter reWffi .T0.116w1ho : date of fin' -j'nterconii.00tt'on- of: tli eiiewable::ftiet g eiierator distribatiob-compan faci fitle& vil win r id n i CrIO 1 M 611c 0 V e-- - tI 0 Mot "N�.,t metain Celf me -ails. me. S- - ".Kr-tho,d t. . g wr rm� p d between- etectricit sup ed- lyietenn cust...n-ipr: ftorn.the h;ctrio ' ph to anot- OW. - the et6oWdit g enerated. 4. d. fed- back ta -the- electric 'd:b the net metenn Customer, usin tS 3 . JA 7 r-dVidW.Ijft 20'V. -Additionat meters .'Per8o ans an i i ,--co�porafi A,,-partnersbip.-as at compao _bUSI S _n. me ridividual. ' - ' wn trust, OnAven-atre Or'-p h d the, Coninionwealth- or. _ i t f er P ` elp CrItif - - an n municipa i. y ew ftle]. V �Ilera r n e. 0 . �ifloa an. We'e tn' 641 ra. _1- f�ci Rb. ab! s 4 �lit that Has �-;an�altcrnati curre '0 iMt of t more.-than 1-0- WOWAtts ot pa -fb rb�ide Jal- customers and- no-t-mo r e. : than 500, k o w or nomesidcnti eastornm -t i er +5 of th as. [ts total filel 2Z, 0�0,8 ke ewa ble.- d f! n -e d. e. Codo of Vir SOWCOI I. The metmot n r: owts- ate S"C ons_ en ' . g oustome and- -o �ra per: s Or. 1 - - OTI. oted witli �t� p. Jo:, own or - operate, or botI. A I .4f h tocoted b- h C om&- - pt&ii kes:- wid u': :dt d -to Ihe customer, �s - on'tha custome-es -side of i4si-111tercowiection- with - the distnbutor. 5, Is -interconnected- p�4rsijant to a., net -meterin atran and -op-Orated: in.parall6tvith and C 1 *'bution compan facififies. ft ele tric d'stn I I wo.-dW y _ n customeVs own, re n1s, --ma A� A- ve ne -MeWri n cilsto -b- 1 -isxenevv e uet he 'Ote aj in: emonnectO basis,,w tv� g .n.r otf-. v` t AM me-teiing.v'"s 'has properly notificd.botb the cleof -ic distributio compaii net er U I and ener sei'vice provider. (iii accord'ance.wi th Of 11-i-s- intell .t-to irate rconnec4, e - bUr - t I. Ifre b the eleotric distrIbution.comp all - 18 Tiot tot I 'Tfj th n n b o. ing wi c nn Y 'but' 16 �d _bPO k' Customerhis ..' sfalle6a�.O( loxtrioA' C 0 isin. ion com an aoQc8.sib.10 a a in p nianu-O.--dl'sco'mle,r,,tswiti�h-. J. ffli c ' 3-4- oft'J-6�. oefted b id:conirwssion-,-ap_ ved-noti at-ion la Y , 81 pro be�h I S-talled pro C fl and that. the : a i C 'a &rm. ghat n a re 'r dmaou t d�8cow ia swit - .. e s renewable:Tuol g enerator bas boob. install-ed in accordanco with: facuroVs' the ma u t s- C Oil jecifi Atk-sasw flas:aff-ap I 4o P rovisiolls of 't.b. 'on 1 El otrical Coa P ficAb e.,Natl a e. -approve. bo, ffi at"on-7forni Ahat vondor has. ctrted, b i iii -:.:th, :..to -i �ion d , 't sipi. g e mi C the:_renewable-� fuel 8 enerator in- - �n ta le'd vs -1 th t g I S u com iance--with e r fabbrAtoiie s - 1 .establishcd- b Undemriterstaboratories or - other: national lestin'. n Accordance with .IEEE Stand rd'-1547-.,.S ra d a r -for Interconnectin Un Jul R- n Tower-S cbs,. .00 r CS-_ WithElect 'ko - Of statie -d'r A e rue g e er is with an a tho W. a. g t c. c h no e rI - 9� W-Ibo.. `bvat r w e m t-- c y in excess-- of . ow-actts., p M.te a I Settin ected-b electdra dist butioll. .001UP . O T-1i in, spoctin elect IIISP d- -s-tr hufiob av:inivose a,-f etenn r n. COM an �m ee: on the, net rn ie . o f no more - tha.n $50 f r, guPkIn IL . 616 .. -I�WaWe_ fuolz etieraors Ab ou. ...n r -a InAhecasio,of nollst tic I a _r c C t t 1 I -c. ompap cu-%tomer has.-Intercormected accordin Iatbe Oectlrledistri b-01 ow. edtion - lines. -and the electric disbibution, compon asinspectedall q ui _t y , Niflon.-compan P -MO d Th p.e in 4ic is n i P rQtectivo, C_ rit so fto e Ths d.` ma impose a MO A A -$50- f 8 . ch i f6e - on th�D iid motes in a bo GWI Of- r -b Stl -inspect' g . 4, . on. tions-.7he capacit Pfflie-re-nenvable', en e imAa bt Ot AtY3,. serv'�ob e tr .1 i ,, a and 8- e i*ic. bution o a CSS 0 CIO 1111�- dish!'. cmpn . -ow d- fuel '90ocrator 1--shall be I thaii, tho: Q4�itoit ofthf : I t rat e n . f interC011 se --etiol, con,(14- M _ service and ., service -ontrautc.o. O-W conectedto- the, p - l� o n e. 01 f y v is- unless- - -the. custonAer rel-nibur&es- the -electlic'.. dI".Strib.ufiO.IA:c In n w. T to- mo&� Y . Ott R, The--net -encr metenn custollier'. Shall -imm 1 Y . 0. 1 -uonat- 8 OTIb -in the- own-qrsbd Y '- or ur-c compan of an P .-Of,, opera j on Ac _ al hifonbAtiob - for. the: g enlaator, j n nd tariff., conside'lrations -20V..AC5�-315-r-abili insurancel W.tr ith. -mtod-_eapkity RO A -net meteiin w u A. w o-mopw al 0�- oth T." illsuralic. o. n.. rov o t pidiu cvera n st $ M' the,�arnuut of- at.- I-e-a 100'00,0- f or - t h-61:11 �of tb nslu - f A 49a'119: Oss allsing-0 t otthe-use of axenewable� fuel g emerlatorand. for,a_-Tenewa�to u.Q g enerator , with 'a c� excetdiA 1.0 k116W_6ttS- oh covorA shAll be., in. the toil -t U'r-ed. to purchase additiona-14'ab *lit whero 20VAC5-31-5-70,Addiflo a contr ^ - ^~'- `^^~ for waiver -' hall b ti k9 T Ls �- •ems _ 1+•4i a • u � _ -ti, �� v L _ � e � - e " } 1 e .° � v � " • , t � � � ',. °�__ - it '. -.. ° �� e , • d � '• � � •.1a F J` 3 ' \: .,'' i °''.\ 1 the � y 1 T r i R to V r r•. , s a i �n,� 1' d h. ti k9 T Ls E ° u . r , t e h 1• IP �t F e , • d � '• � � •.1a F J` 3 ' \: .,'' i °''.\ 1 the � " L • o F ' j q 1 a ° PM III Y , 9 7 R = .. dill _ a u u 41 N _ i _e M1 e. + � � •,�. � e m om., , .. , `k .'. pp,, _ l •t 41 ! y 9f _ } a , — Ilk r • r� ° � r i e s� uPl r r _ � a n � E • e v r k u P r � VT_ t Applicants Name: Douglas R McCallum Existing Zoning: A G 1 Roanoke County Department of Prop Zoning: AG 1 S Tax Map Number. . 74.00-03 .01 Community Development Magisterial District: Windsor Hills Area: 2.414 Acres 9 February, 2011 Scale: 1 " = 100' Applicants Name: Douglas R McCallum Existing Zoning: A G 1 Roanoke County Department of Proposed Zoning: AG 1 S Tax Map Number. . 74.00-03-38.00-0000 .01 Community Development Magisterial District: Windsor Hills Area: 2.414 Acres 9 February, 2011 Scale: 1 " = 100' ACTION NO. ITEM NO. G -1-4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 8, 2011 AGENDA ITEM: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards SUBMITTED BY: Deborah C. Jacks Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator'�Y COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Review Committee (appointed by District) The following one -year terms expired on August 31, 2010: ➢ Brian Hooker representing the Catawba Magisterial District (not eligible for reappointment as maximum number of terms served) ➢ Wes Thompson representing the Windsor Hills Magisterial District (resigned due to health) 2. League of Older Americans Board of Directors (Appointed by LOA and ratified by the County) ➢ The League of Older Americans Board of Directors has requested that the Board of Supervisors ratify the appointment of Pamela Bernado to serve a three -year term that will expire on March 31, 2014. Ratification of this appointment has been placed on the consent agenda. 3. Parks, Recreation and Tourism Commission (appointed by District) ➢ Michael W. Altizer has appointed Mike Roop to represent the Vinton Magisterial District. This term will expire on June 30, 2012. Confirmation of this appointment Page 1 of 2 has been placed on the consent agenda. ➢ David Watt, who represents the Catawba Magisterial District, has resigned. His three -year term will expire on June 30, 2012. 4. Roanoke County Community Leaders Environmental Action Roundtable (RC CLEAR) (appointed by District) ➢ Ruth Deibler, who represented the Vinton Magisterial District, has moved from the area and is no longer serving on RC -CLEAR ➢ Renee Goddard, who represents the Hollins Magisterial District has advised she no longer will be able to serve on this committee Page 2 of 2 ri AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 22, 2011 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM H - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for March 22, 2011, designated as Item H - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 4 inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of minutes — March 1, 2011; March 8, 2011 2. Request to appropriate $19,087.50 to the Clerk of the Circuit Court from the State for fiscal year 2919 -2011 3. Confirmation of appointments to the League of Older Americans Board of Directors; Roanoke Valley- Alleghany Regional Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) Committee 4. Request for appointment of Alternate Representative from the Department of Social Services to the Roanoke County Community Policy Management Team (CPMT) ACTION NO. ITEM NO. H -2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 22, 2011 AGENDA ITEM: Request to appropriate $19,087.59 to the Clerk of the Circuit Court from the State for fiscal year 2019 -2011 SUBMITTED BY: W. Brent Robertson Director of Management and Budget APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator i3V.1-- COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Technology Trust Funds, representing fees collected by the Roanoke County circuit Court Clerk's office, have been received from the State in the amount of $19,087.59. These funds have been earmarked for the purpose of purchasing software, hardware, maintenance and related upgrades to the indexing software utilized by the Courts. These funds need to be appropriated to the Clerk of Circuit Court so that the necessary computers and equipment can be purchased. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact -100% state funds STAFF REcOMMENDAnON: Staff recommends appropriating $19,987.59 to the Clerk of Circuit Court for fiscal year 201 0 -2911. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. H -3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 22, 2011 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of appointments to the League of Older Americans Board of Directors; Parks, Recreation and Tourism Commission; Roanoke Valley- Alleghany Regional Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) Committee SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Deborah C. Jacks Clerk to the Board B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. League of Older Americans Board of Directors (Appointed by LOA and ratified by the County) ➢ The League of Older Americans Board of Directors has requested that the Board of Supervisors ratify the appointment of Pamela Bernado to serve a three -year term that will expire on March 31, 2014. The ratification was placed on the consent agenda. 2. Parks, Recreation and Tourism Commission (appointed by District) ➢ Michael W. Altizer has appointed Mike Roop to represent the Vinton Magisterial District. This term will expire on June 30, 2012. Confirmation of this appointment has been placed on the consent agenda. Page 1 of 2 3. Roanoke Valley - Allegheny Regional Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) Committee: ➢ During their closed meeting on March 8, 2011, the Board of Supervisors re- appointed Eddie "Ed" Elswick to an additional three -year term, which will expire March 31, 2014. Confirmation of the appointment was placed on the Consent Agenda. Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. H -4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 22, 2011 AGENDA ITEM: Request for appointment of Alternate Representative from the Department of Social Services to the Roanoke County Community Policy Management Team (CPMT) SUBMITTED BY: Daniel R. O'Donnell Assistant County Administrator APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Joyce Earl, Director of Social Services has appointed Patience O'Brien, Assistant Director of Social Services to serve as her alternate on the Roanoke County Community Policy and Management Team (CPMT). In accordance with the CPMT bylaws, this appointment should be ratified by the Board of Supervisors. It is staff recommendation to - the Board of Supervisor's to approve the appointment of Patience O'Brien as the alternate for Joyce Earl, Director of Social Services on the Roanoke County Community Policy and Management Team. GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Audited balance at June 30, 2919 Addition of 2999 -10 operations Balance at March 22, 2911 Amount L -1 % of General Fund Revenue $ 19, 959 122 10.89% * 213,190 $ 29,172,318 10.64% ** Mote: On December 21, 2994, the Board of Supervisors adopted a policy to increase the General Fund Unappropriated Balance incrementally over several years. * 2009-10 a range of 9.5%-10.5% of General Fund Revenues 2009-10 General Fund Revenues $188,758,550 9.5% of General Fund Revenues $17,741,872 19.5% of General Fund Revenues $19,899,438 ** 2919 -11 a range of 10.0% -11.9 % of General Fund Revenues 2919 -11 General Fund Revenues $189,818,185 10.0 % of General Fund Revenues $18,981,819 11.0 % of General Fund Revenues $20,858,000 The Unappropriated Fund Balance of the County is currently maintained at 10.64% which is within the range of our goal for 2919 -11. The County's goal is to increase the balance over time to 11.0% Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator 0"9� L -2 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL RESERVES Minor County Capital Reserve (Projects not in the CIP, architecturallengineering services, and other one -time expenditures.) Audited balance at June 30, 2010 Addition of 2009 -10 operations September 28, 2010 Appropriation for option on 5755 Crystal Creek Drive December 14, 2010 Appropriation to purchase one fire vehicle December 14, 2010 Appropriation to replace the Walrond Park ball field lights December 14, 2010 Appropriation to terminate agreement for Jack Smith Industrial Park Amount December 14, 2010 Appropriation to purchase property and house at 5755 Crystal Creek D $1,400,233.20 2 (6 (82,847.00) (150,000.00) (382,632.72) (60,000.00) Balance at March 22, 2011 $2,794,330.48 Mcluor County Capital Reserve (Projects in the ClP, debt payments to expedite projects identified in ClP, and land purchase opportunities.) Unaudited balance at June 30, 2010 $883,539.00 Balance at March 22, 2011 Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By B. Clayton Goodman III County Administratorlpar $8839539-00 L -3 RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY COUNTY of ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount From 201 0 -2011 Original Budget $1 00,000.99 July 13, 2010 Appropriation for Legislative Liaison (24,000.00) December 14, 2010 Appropriation for Special Election January 11, 2911 (19 January 11, 2011 Appropriation for additional audit fees (8,217.50) Balance at March 22, 2911 Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance $ 48,262.50 Approved By B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator W-q- ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER L -4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER. MEETING DA rE: March 22, 2011 AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of February 28, 2011 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: CASH INVESTMENT: SUNTRUST CON 8 8 GOVERNMENT: SMITH BARNEY CONTRA 128 SMITH BARNEY 73 WELLS FARGO 16 ,41 0.00 WELLS FARGO CONTRA 0.99 99 LOCAL GOV'T INVESTMENT POOL: 3,083 17 GENERAL OPERATION 13 13 CD: BRANCH BANKING & TRUST 2 2,000,000.09 MONEY MARKET: BRANCH BANKING & TRUST 1 MORGAN STANLEY - JAIL 1 SMITH BARNEY 11 STELLAR ONE 1,038,087.28 WELLS FARGO 3,083 17 TOTAL 128, 930, 824.98 03/22/2011 0 N Q o N C7 °, 00 LO 00 (D � I` (D 00 r 0) O LO O O N LO (D C) r M O r LO N Imo- (D M N (D 1` (D I` (D r O O d7 LO (D I` I` Ltd O NT N N M 00 O O O N O O f` O N L6 O N (D 00 N 4 f` N li 6 'i M L6 M O N r r r LO 00 M N V - N (D 00 O 1` M O7 I` r LO r It N N (D N It (D r � (D LO 00 00 O � M 4 4 00 O (D M 00 ;T I` � r d7 00 M 00 00 00 d7 N 00 (D N (D LO CF) d7 r M O O M CD r (D M O 00 CD f` d7 r M d7 LO O 00 � I` d7 (D N N 00 00 O N r N r r M r M r M LO 00 N I` r d7 r M� N � O ( Y7 i (D LO 0) (D f` O � M N O (D C (D r M M d7 co O I` co � O r M O r N O a� a N N O LO M O d7 00 It LO M 00 O � I` LO ' L � M O M O 00 (D O 4 O7 00 a7 O _N (D O 4 a7 O ti 00 (D 4 V a 4 L6 LO O m o � LO (D LO LO (D O � N � � 'IT LO LO Lt) M N � r � I` It r C � 00 M Lr > r r L M > MFG � U V co N r LO I` O � aN N � (D N .� O LO I` (D N I` 00 O LO M (D r LO (D O r G� 1 m 00 M m .he M r O O _ N M co 1` W O7 I� M 00 M (D 00 (D I` N O OC .O O m o 0 O I` d � r +� r > N r 0 O N r 00 I` O I` I` (D O d) M 00 00 N r O 00 LO U Cl) o O O M 00 N r 4) d I` M r L(7 Lt's I` 00 r S Z (D d7 r N O 00 L O LL L cn O LO CL r I` d a � E L � O r L. r �""' U a N 0 N LO N M 07 >' p O N v m 0 N Q o N C7 °, 00 LO 00 (D � I` (D 00 r 0) O LO O O N LO (D C) r M O r LO N Imo- (D M N (D 1` (D I` (D r O O d7 LO (D I` I` Ltd O NT N N M 00 O O O N O O f` O N L6 O N (D 00 N 4 f` N li 6 'i M L6 M O N r r r LO 00 M N V - N (D 00 O 1` M O7 I` r LO r It N N (D N It (D r � (D LO 00 00 O � M 4 4 00 O (D M 00 ;T I` � r d7 00 M 00 00 00 d7 N 00 (D N (D LO CF) d7 r M O O M CD r (D M O 00 CD f` d7 r M d7 LO O 00 � I` d7 (D N N 00 00 O N r N r r M r M r M LO 00 N I` r d7 r M� N � O ( Y7 i (D LO 0) (D f` 1�- M O7 O (D O (D r M M d7 co O I` co � O r M O r N I` N N r O LO M O d7 00 It LO M 00 O � I` LO O � M O M O 00 (D O 4 O7 00 a7 O O (D O 4 a7 O ti 00 (D 4 O 4 L6 LO O LO 'IT le to (D LO LO (D O � N � � 'IT LO LO Lt) M N � r � I` It r r � 00 M Lr r r M > N (n 00 r LO I` O (D O � (D N � O LO I` (D N I` 00 O LO M (D r LO (D O r d7 M 00 M Lt7 O7 M r O N It N M co 1` (D O7 I� M 00 M (D 00 (D I` N r O r (D r O I` N co r M r N r O N r 00 I` O I` I` (D O d) M 00 00 N r O 00 LO r � M I` O O M 00 N r (D r I` M r L(7 Lt's I` 00 r LO (D d7 r q O 00 (D M cn O LO O r I` � LO N � O r r �""' r N 0 N LO N M 07 >' p O N v X o a a) cn a� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D o O O O O O O O O LO O O O O O O O O Lt) O O O r O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O N O 00 LO I` M LO O O LO O O O O r O LO O I` LO LO O r qlzi 00 d7 O U f` O LO (D (D 00 tD O (D (D � (` r � N M M O 00 r 'IT r 07 00 (D (D r 04 d7 LO (D � M D7 N LO a7 r O (� � I` I` N t M 00 M LO a_ r r U M M cn cn C/) +r CO N E C� r � O • J 06 ~ cn cn 0 o 0 v d7 LO O M N N O O 00 LO N I� M N 00 (D r CF) (D LO O O 00 I` I` LO M O N N N N LO 00 L(7 N 00 L(7 O LO 00 O (D 00 a) O (D (D 6 c'7 (D I` Lt7 r N I` I` r Lt7 I` (D li L6 L6 r M T--: r Ld7 O O ('7 It O LO It I* LO LO LO (D L- r � � � LO (D Le) C\l LO a) N 'IT � CL CL CL CL U J U m 2 0 L N CL CL L.L V - M r N (D M O (D � O r O d7 07 O LO It 00 07 07 I` I` O7 r N M d7 00 LO 00 I� 00 (D 00 00 (D d7 r r � N M � I` m M LO M r O f` r O O N O O O M f` f` M r O r 00 07 r 00 N I` N N M M a7 I` I` N 00 N O LO T N N O O 00 (D (D I` LO 00 00 CD N r 00 00 N N O (D O N (D m Lf7 d7 00 M (D 00 (D M N tD M O O LO � M I� N � d7 N N N N N N r M N M M M N LO N M O O O r O r O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a7 0 0 0 O O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 (D o It a7 0 LO M O O O O M c" i O LO LO O O O O LO O O r to M r M O O 07 I` LO O LO f` (D 00 r le to LO � f` I` N (D O 00 O � O d) O LO 00 LO O d) O LO O r Lt) or) N m LO LO I` It N r � 00 M Lr r r M > N (n 00 N r cn cn X LL M X cn A O Un CL - >> O a- N > N (n cn cn X LL 06 X cn m C: (� m O ~ t6 F --- N ch O O cn Cn 4-- X C: �""' LL O 07 >' p O v X o a a) cn a� _ O U O O N N N to O 4-a • J U_ cn O 0 4.0 //��►► L ,,,x W U cn L J . V ��// I.J. C: o A YJ p 0 � O I..L C . >1 (� N v a_ (6 M U cn cn C/) +r Q E C� N � O • J 06 ~ cn cn 0 o 0 v O O — ° a � o a 4-j a 0 0 � E E N ° L U (n +r O X �"� X O L L W O a) a) � O p O :3 L- C o +r O to }' J Q a) � CL CL CL CL U J U m 2 0 L CL CL L.L U CL Q C� O ca ca O N 'IT d7 O r N M m 0 f` 00 O7 O O r N It ti 00 r � V N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 N M O N c0 N N LO N C) O M CD Cc) f` N I* r (D O f` 00 O N qq O O Ln M M rte- O r N O N f` O (D C) O 00 N N 'IT O 'IT Co O O O O O V--' c"j O ti r N (c) 00 r N 6 O M r r LO M Lf r r r r O r r r r r CD r r LO � r LO r CD O d) d) O 00 r O Cc) It O f` N O O N r r M Cc) 1` � f` r O CD O C) LSD (c) Cc) r f� - 00 CD O N N O LC) M O O O M 00 C) 00 O O M N O O O O O N M M ti M d7 N CD 00 O N O Ltd 00 N CD r r O O (V ti r c0 M 00 LO f` N r � r r r r r r i r M N N N N LO 'IT � M N -q ti N LO � N O (Q O It O O I* O p � M M r 4- O a� bi) a � N M O M d) � O r Ldp d) O O O w O p ' L r r N N N Ln N N o0 f` wi N li ti r r O O N O p CD Cc) V a M r V M N � CD LO N r N to LO Cc) O LSD Cc) f` d N m M f` LO M N I` c0 N I` O c0 M 07 Cc) f` 00 O f` a) O O c0 N N L O r I� MFG � U O � 'IT V 00 N O 00 Ldp � aN N O O h N N M r r O LO LA M r d O O 00 P- 07 M f` N m O tm M N Lt 1 (C) Co O _ M W r Lf7 N I` Cc) N r r O OC .o O �, r m o O 0 O d N N > m M � O 00 M M O oo '-T O U Cl) O LC r r 4) d Im N N S CD N Cc) f` L O LL L d O CL E r �+ O . L. N U a N 00 CC O O O O O O O O O N O N O I` O O m 0 N M O N c0 N N LO N C) O M CD Cc) f` N I* r (D O f` 00 O N qq O O Ln M M rte- O r N O N f` O (D C) O 00 N N 'IT O 'IT Co O O O O O V--' c"j O ti r N (c) 00 r N 6 O M r r LO M Lf r r r r O r r r r r CD r r LO � r LO r CD O d) d) O 00 r O Cc) It O f` N O O N r r M Cc) 1` � f` r O CD O C) LSD (c) Cc) r f� - 00 CD O N N O LC) M O O O M 00 C) 00 O O M N O O O O O N M M ti M d7 N CD 00 O N O Ltd 00 N CD r r O O (V ti r c0 M 00 LO f` N r � r r r r r r i r M N N N N LO 'IT � M 1 ;T -q ti N LO LO N O 00 O It O O I* O p � M M r Cc) p � LO M O M d) � O r Ldp d) O O O w O p oi r r r N N N Ln N N o0 f` wi f` li ti r r O O N O p CD Cc) CD M r V M Cc) LO CD M N r N to LO Cc) O LSD Cc) f` N N CD M M f` LO M N I` c0 N I` O c0 M 07 Cc) f` 00 O f` a) O O c0 N N O O r I� O 1` O � 'IT C) O 00 Ldp r � O O h N N M r r O LO LA M r O O 00 P- 07 M f` N O 1` N Lt 1 (C) Co c)j q- M LO r Lf7 N I` Cc) N r r 04 r tD N N O r N N O I` M r 00 M M LO LO '-T O M Lf7 LC r r CY) Im N N r CD N Cc) f` O r O r r N N r N 00 CC O O O O O O O O O N O N O I` O O O O O 1- O C) T O O O O O LO O LA O N N le O O7 O r O O � qq M O O O O O f` O 1` O N r M O O O (D O 1` LO Ld) CD 00 00 O LO 00 C N r Cc) O � � O O O tD N N N LO LD LO LC 00 M N r 00 M O r O N 07 N q* LC 00 00 M M O r Cc) N M LSD r 00 O 'IT a) M M M M r N N M T N N c0 O Co (D r I* N O O 00 r 07 M I� O co O O O O .4 O O M 07 C) (D M co f` O M O NT r CD d) M (D d) r O O C) O O N O O f` L6 1` Lid O CD M 00 r C; LSD Cc) r o0 o0 O O r O O c0 Cc) CD M M M LO Ln M M co M 00 O 00 � (D 1` N N r r N N 1 * f` (c) N N 00 00 c0 r O LO M M O O N O O r r r 'IT 'IT c0 N M CD O NT LO O (D LO O M N 00 qq M 07 C) O 07 c0 � O le (c) LO Cc) c0 N O M O LO O N CD (C) CD LO 1` N 00 O N r 00 N O (D O N Cc) M q* N f` ti N N co r p 00 d) N N N ti N ti N LC W) N N � ti r r M O r M C") r r M N r N O C) O O O O O O O O O O O r ' O r LO r O O O N Ltd M O O It It M It d) LO O O O O CD M M O O Co O O O Ltd Ln O O O � (D O LSD M co N O O O O N N O Lf7 LO O cn U W U O N U O N 00 Cc) 1�- O � f` O O CD � L.L Q a (� U w U '— O � N � U + r O N 00 00 m 00 O O O O O Lid M f` to f` Cc) M d) 07 O N N O m H co O H O q r 0 H N 00 O H LO r LO Cc) LO O H M LO O N 'IT N 00 O 00 O f` 1�- O O O M O M O O O r O � M N M O O N N N 4 >, N N N 4-j N cn 0 .2 J L O LL ca � M � N �_ U- a 0 d L p LL N U- 0 Q c E O 4-- 4-- (L) :3 C: O O o a- ^O^'' E O L L N :3 c O O O a a a) G — U O (L) Ll U cn U W U O N U N O v �> 4- N a, U U) cn Q -a N t6 -0 E N cn O U a) N > O O cn O U � N > O O � N O S < ca U '� 0 � ca U O z cn c/) � O L j N w U N • L VJ F �U O U) 06 N N Q U 0) ^' 4J U O � cn +r O cn N •> C O_ �U O U) 06 N c6 N CD � L.L Q a (� U w U '— O � N � U + r O > (1) � a� LL _ cn cn L �O 0 V J Q i C �U O Cl) �_ r_ IL �c r_ m �- j LL O L O O m H co O H O q r 0 H N 00 O H O LSD r LO Cc) LO O H O (D r Cc) It Cc) M I� O 00 N 00 O 00 O H N 0 07 H O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N � N � M O N N N Lt) d7 Q� M V- r Lt) LO Lt) r 'T Re N O C I* pp 00 f` 1� N C) C) a O ° o o 0 0 V- 6 T" f` f M O O 00 ti ti O N co CD ti f` f r O O N f` 1` co N N r N VII O O a) M O O V- r 00 00 00 LO LA CF) r N O C ti G) O ti 00 Co N LO Lt) 00 V- r OD pl rl. a p O r cy) a) O r fA W N L r N o F (3) F- f► C) � N � (Q 4- O a� a N ' L N V Q LO L MFG � U V 00 N � Q N N O _ W O OC .o O 2, m o O E - � m Q' O ♦"� 00 U Cl) o 4) d S L O LL L d CL E �+ O .O L. V a d m O N � N � M O N N N Lt) d7 Q� M V- r Lt) LO Lt) r 'T Re N O C I* pp 00 f` 1� N C) C) a O ° o o 0 0 V- 6 T" f` f M O O 00 ti ti O N co CD ti f` f r O O N f` 1` co N N r N VII O O a) M O O V- r 00 00 00 LO LA CF) r N O C ti G) O ti 00 Co N LO Lt) 00 V- r OD pl rl. a p O r cy) a) O r fA W N L r N o F (3) F- f► C) r--a O N \ oc M cn W ca L E V W L N � L �••r � L t L co U Q N x N m W C L � / Q � C O to w +� O o o V o E ♦..+ L '�//� L- yr L a_ a L L O L- O V N 0 � N N d U O �L O V Q x = ca w W o o� N N d v L C E x C W W ca m E o � to Z x _ M w W o oZf N v E a a = x W W ca d a7 m 1` 1` r � co C m M 00 m m r �� 00 (D N r 1` r r 1` 1` M � CD r I` co ti LO it r r N M It f` O N w M O r (D 'n N O M 'i N ch O N (D O 00 00 GO 4 M 4 M N C ti 00 O N M r 00 M 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lf) N U') M co co m � N 1` Lf) C N M r r O 00 r m UO O le co m M CO r r O 00 00 N � Lf) 1` w r 00 O (D CD C CD P- r O M r Lf) m 1` co r co co m M It r 00 W N r 0 N M 4 ? (D r- m 1` N 'IT 'IT co N M 00 co N r N M M 1` C N � CA (D O C CD Ln co N W O Ln M 00 N r CO ' �; m � Lf) U") G7 r M N M r C � co ' N r co co r co N m 00 co I* U 00 1 � r M t � N M CD r I` ti N 1 r N r 1 1 a M L!7 � O O r co r (D 00 co w N m CD era 1�- m m 00 T 1` O p 3 M oo M C; CD ui p o0 1` M 1` f` 3 (D Ltd (D w Ln co w CD CD CD (D t0 00 00 CD N Lf� r p 6 N CD N N N CD CD CD Lf) CD W M Lf) 1` CD O N O M m O M r M o0 1` O r 1` r � CD 11- O f` co co r m N Ln N r m to Lt7 CO r 'IT ~ M Ln CD m � � � LO N O p co 00 1` 00 m r 1` r 00 O m f` 'IT ti M r 1` � M 00 O O � O to r m co O co r Ln co r m 1` M O C N CD r M M 4 ? M O m 1` 00 00 00 lqe ti vi 00 O r r N M r 1` P. Ln lqf vi r a i m vi O M N N M N M O r r O 1I w M� m 00 M G7 m N O� 1` M C r co M O r co N r co N m 00 co I* � m N M N N M CD r I` ti N M r N r m 00 l 00 r r r 00 00 Lid N N N T r N t M v ~ r r O Ln m CD N O N I` r CD M ~ M N O M (D w 00 N O O p m co O O co 1` co I` r 1` O LO M N 1` r O M CD le m O O O to T 1` O 0o I` le 1` N p M CD r 0 N N r M 1` M p M m m I` p 0 m rl (D M 00 rl vi M ui 00 O N P. 00 r lqf O oi m O G di N N N N O O r N N N w Lf7 m 00 O G7 00 f` M 1` 00 r O O r O M co 00 M co co m T O I* N N N Lid N N CD M r r 00 m N O N G7 co m l 00 r r N N r co r 00 M N co N r N t Ln V G7 N N 11 1 Lf7 r 00 � M I� O N M m 00 M O O M N (D N m co N O N CO r O O N m CD O m N m (D N O 1` co 00 C co U 6 co m � 6 M 00 6 N r 00 M 4 M N O N co 6 00 O 1` LO M co Lf) co 06 (D 0 LO M to c m C O LO CO to m co r- 1` co U O � O ti m co ~ m M m O ~ r N I` O U') to 00 CD 1` O C co O r r-- 1;T N co vi co N r r r- N M M 1� r M to (D N N O N O O co 00 O to O N r 00 co N r Cy O It CD 00 m to M r M O to 'IT 'IT Ir- m N cl N m 1` f` a- N Ln M co 1` � ti N m V-: L6 O O 00 M rl O o0 O c o ti CD cfl N O N 00 N"a 00 N co 1` N w O CA co 00 o0 N 00 N � r 00 1~ co O O 00 N N N 00 r- r 1` 00 N N r r Go � co l 00 r r r m 00 co N N N r r ~ co M to r r r m 1` ti CA � M N CD CD m M N � O I` � to Ln M O O co It Lf) r L!7 co p M ;T co U") N Li) O M r r (D T N to M 1` Q a O co 1` O CA CD O to O M Cy I` It r M Cy 00 It N M 00 to m O 00 T r N CA O I` O 00 O I` 1` N r 1` M 1` CO CO r IT CD m co N m m 00 00 O Ie I` O co N cfl 00 IT m r- N"a (D O N E co w N Lf) 00 N o0 T N M m co N It O 00 00 m' ti 1` CO r r 00 m N O N O co O f` 00 r r N co N co M N r N Lt7 O N N r r M r r m c6 a N cn 'C_ F E Q U Q t6 O C °6 E L C cu Q U- O > 0 > ° o (' O L C (D w r N co O O O C r r r C O O O T- CD O cn U U O r N N N C O O C N O s= cn O O U U L� 06 O cn O7 0 L (D cn N N Y E U C) L O O E m L O� C O O 0 U ca cn w L E •_ U) L- 0 s= ii U Q a r N co 'IT O O co co O co O C co O O O C O M C C O C= cn O C: O cu in N M Q as O L cn c cn N N d � U � U N cu CU Cl) O 2 U) Q U) m U) 0- U 2 co qq O 00 O O O O C LO LO LO LO C O O O O Lf) O O c6 U 0 L cu ca 0 J V N (D CD O O cn O cn 06 - N m U cn cn O7 L (D cn N Y VJ Q :3 L O O E m o � }, ?: as a�i W W U) (� of w s a r N co qq LO O O O O O C C O O O O O I* O C= cn O C: O cu in N M Q as O L cn c cn N N d � U � U N cu CU Cl) O 2 U) Q U) m U) 0- U 2 co qq O 00 O O O O C LO LO LO LO C O O O O Lf) O O c6 U 0 L cu ca 0 J V N (D CD O O N O Ln U N O co O ns 00 \ � O �L O M O cn > f` co O W N � M V O M O r r ;T co O r 1` o f` 00 _N r f` 00 ns O LO O V Q N 's? N O L6 le ti O (D O m r O N O N O LO r O w w o N M N co r N Ltd ' CO N r O V 00 M N W M O N m co co t0 co O co ~ r M m W 00 00 r r r L6 L N r_ W W r L L N N r L Lt) O Go U O Q N M M W N O . m L V Q M 00 co w /1• C O to W Q� O a E o i p m = a i - 00 C _ w W o O O }' v o L E O G E D (6 W O co O LL � = i U a U ♦--� v w o a O x W � C: a W � O r N M LO V r N M'IT 0 f` 00 d a7 r N O (D O O ti O ti O O ti ti O O 00 00 O 00 O 00 m N 0 � N N N M m 00 Lf) f` w ti Ln Lf) O O O O GO Ltd r N m r N O O M M r O O O O O M m m r 00 Ln 'T 6 N r 00 0 CV O O O O M m LO m 1 1 ' N O Ln � M O co O Lf) � O O O O O r f` co O r N O M O O M O r r ;T co O r 1` o f` 00 0 r f` 00 f` O LO O O N 's? N O L6 le ti O (D O m r O N O N O LO r O T N M N co r N Ltd ' CO N r O r 00 M co � M O co m co co t0 co O co ~ r M m W 00 00 r r r L6 N N O 00 r L a N N N Lt) O w O t N M CO � M r M C* N f` m O O O O t4 (4 co N N M � r O O CD M f- O O O O N r O Gs 3 ti Ltd O f` O 4 .4 r r (6 O O ui li Lt d CO t0 0 � 0 m t0 � m co m (fl r 00 M O O r 0 m � 0 0 0 0 r N O M (3) O O le N O M O CO M O r r ;T co O r 00 o N;T 00 0 0 f` (fl f` O m r N N 's? N O L6 M r O O M V vi ui Ln O r O r r O T N m '� Lt) N f- Ltd m O N 07 r M ~ 00 M co � M O O N co t0 co O co ~ r M m W 00 00 r r r L6 N N O 00 r L a N N N Lt) O w O r co co M co Gp O N f` m G7 UD O N O O M 00 � (3) 00 ti N le 00 00 M N N N O r 0 0 0 r r 00 f` to 00 O 0 r � M N m O N O O N co ti It N ti f` M ti r rl Ln N r rl d6 O O 00 N 00 O N N r O 00 m M O N CO N 01 M r � � M O 00 GO co t0 co N M r r m W 00 00 r N r t0 N N d Lfl r L a N N N Lt) O w O r co N ( N M 00 co M w O M Ul m � N 0 0 0 (D I - d) O N M N U f` N m (O � O O O O ti � d) C* 3 ti 00 r N 6 N 6 00 O O O O 00 6 co 00 r M O f` O G7 (D M M 0 0 0 0 N � ti O 00 O N f� 00 O ~ N (M r O 0 M O 00 GO N O ti It LO r- 0 N (D f` O r c0 dM N N 00 M � r O r co (D M O U') 00 t (4 M C N O m It It O d7 Ln r O U") O � m T M CI 00 O CO r M r � co c� 1` O N C) ;T r M r W M 00 r N O co O m CD d O It co c U 00 M O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 'IT w O f` ti ti � Lf) 00 O Gp m O 0 G O O N Gp t9 M O r M 0 0 0 0 w r O M O O M r I* r ' Lfl (6 N O lqf 00 Cfl N O lqf O O M O a d7 O6 GO N O M O � r C7 M M O O r Lf) Ln N � r QD c� 1` Lf") r U r N r W M 00 r N O w O m CD d LA v C L a N N N Lt) O w O ti co qe 1` r N 00 co T" lqr O LO 00 w O M LO M oi CD r LO r N T" CO w T" lqr O N d) T" LO O CS LO ti CO Ltd O N 00 O O O r O r N F- m A E N U_ Q C Q = U C C) U 0 C a) G1 _ t6 N :3 0 :3 0 off cn C E CL O cn a'S O 0 C cn cn o ° Z m � m >, �_ c� m O W > O > d J N > m d Cl) v C L a N a) ® m (1) L O w >, m E L O O G E D (6 W O C � U a U w U v w o U 0 z C: C F- M r N M LO r N M'IT 0 f` 00 r N O (D O O ti O ti O O ti ti O O 00 00 O 00 O 00 O 00 O 00 O 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 000 O O a) O O O O T" lqr O LO 00 w O M LO M oi CD r LO r N T" CO w T" lqr O N d) T" LO O CS LO ti CO Ltd O N 00 O O O r O r N F- m A ACTION NO. ITEM IVo. M -1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 22, 2011 AGENDA ITEM: Work session to discuss fiscal year 2011 -2012 budget development SUBMITTED BY: W. Brent Robertson Director of Management and Budget APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside to provide an update on fiscal year 2011 -2012 budget development. Attached is a summary outlining the major sources and uses of funds utilized in development of the preliminary fiscal year 2011 -2012 operating budget. Budget information is still preliminary as revenue estimates have not been finalized at this point in the process. Final adoption of the state budget will occur in early April (Governor's veto session April 6, 2011) and personal property data for billing purposes will be completed by the end of March. Once tlmiis information is obtained, revenue estimates will be finalized and the County Administrator will present a proposed budget to the Board of Supervisors on April 12, 2011. A public hearing on the proposed budget will held on April 26, 2011. To conclude fiscal year 2011 -2012 budget development, the first reading of the Budget Appropriation Ordinance will be held on May 10, 2011, with the second reading and final adoption held on May 24. Roanoke County Sources and Uses of New Revenues FY2011 -2012 Available New Revenue Proposed Expenditures RE Tax Relief - Disabled Veterns exemption (100 %) Employee Benefits Health Insurance increase (4.8 %) Line of Duty Liability credit Transfer To Capital: Joint County /School CIP Fund - Annual agreement Rt. 220 Waterline increase Payroll system - Hosting site Revenue Bond increase School Operating Transfer Operatio Increases: Social Services - Public Assistance Sheriff: Part -time (increase in courts) Food (contractual increase) Library - South County operations Fire & Rescue - PT (Read Mountain) Utilities: General Services - County -wide public facilities Other Operating Departments (Library, Fire, P &R) Capital Maintenance - facilities IT- Software licenses; Maintenance agreements Police - SPCA fees J &DR Court - Court Appointed Attorney's fees Contributions - VA 1st Industrial Authority Fuel Reserve (Contingency) Expenditure Savings: Benefits changes, retirements, terminations, etc. VDOT Revenue - sharing Economic Development incentives Payment in Lieu of Taxes - Jack Smith Indust. Park Position Elimination (attrition): Community Development: CSR II (2) Real Estate Valuation: Parks & Recreation: Unallocated a@ 3/22/11 Planner II CSR I Recreation Programmer $ 300,000 368,212 115,720 300,000 45,334 75,006 164 946,667 1 150,000 125 321 69,000 60,000 1 7, 000 150,000 110,306 9,000 4,560 34,255 ..�� (418,489) (500,000) (263,334) (65,000) (76,927) (55,336) (35,901 ) (58,347) $ 3,181,320 (4,609,516) 1 $ 451138 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. M -2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 22, 2011 AGENDA ITEM: work session on County of Roanoke Transportation (CORTRAN) SUBMITTED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III Count y Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time will be set aside to review the County of Roanoke Transportation program, costs and the contract renewal. County of Roanoke Summary of CORTRAN Program History of Program • The County of Roanoke Transportation (CORTRAN) started in 1985 for the purpose of providing a means of travel for citizens at least 60 years of age and /or physically challenged citizens as per Easter Seal requirements Summary of Budget, Expenditures, and Surplus (Deficit) Fiscal Year Budget Expenditures Surplus (Deficit) 6 -30 -07 $351 $474 $(123 6 -30 -08 $399 $505 $(105 6 -30 -09 $406 $528 $(121 6 -30 -10 $577 $419772.70 $ 158, 041.80 6 -30 -11 $525 $450 $ 75 (projected) 2010 -2011 Program Changes Implemented • Requiring riders to recertify every two years • Requesting several reports from RADAR for back up to their monthly invoices • Coding an expiration date of six months for Nursing Homes • Coding a temporary number for riders using the program for rehab • Developing a spreadsheet on every application to document in detail how they qualify for the program • Taking three to five days to qualify and process new applications • Adding more detail information into the Route Match System • Increased rider fee to $4.00 per one way trip from $3.50 per one way trip 1 County of Roanoke Summary of CORTRAN Program 0 Limiting the amount of tickets that can be purchased at a time Future Budget Concerns •► Potential Loss of Federal and State Grant Funding — i.e. 5311 Operating Program Grant, Job Access Reverse /Commute Grant, New Freedom Grant « Increased usage by Nursing Homes ® Increased cost of gas Status of Contract i Draft sent to RADAR with suggested changes as follows: o No increase in hourly rate o During the term of contract the County shall appoint one member to the board of directors of Unified Human Services Transportation Systems, Inc. o No fee shall be charged for a no show rider 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. M -3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 22, 2011 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session on the Virginia Retirement System (VRS) SUBMITTED BY: Diane D. Hyatt Assistant County Administrator APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY of INFORMATION: County staff is compiling information regarding the proposal discussed at the March 8, 201 Board of Supervisors (BoS) meeting regarding discussions on feasibility of implementing plan 2 employees payment of the employee match of five percent (5 %). The Conference Report eliminated from the introduced budget the option for local governments to require current employees to contribute the 5 percent (5 %) employee share of their VRS pensions. Since the BoS March 8 th meeting, the Virginia Municipal League (VK/IL) and the Virginia Association of Counties (VACo) have asked the Governor to amend the budget to restore the local option to require the five percent (5 %) employee contribution coupled with a mandatory five percent (5 %) pay increase. Information is being collected for these two options and will be provided at the work session on March 22, 2011. Staff regrets not being able to complete this analysis and include information in the packet, but we are awaiting further clarification as to potential impact of the requested action. y AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 22, 2011 RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.2 -3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke county, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each member's knowledge: 1. only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies; and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke county, Virginia. P -1 PETITIONER: Ray Craighead CASE NUMBER: 4- 312011 Board of Supervisors consent 15' Reading Date: 2/22/2011 Planning commission Hearing Date: 3/1/2011 Board of Supervisors Hearing & 2 nd Reading Date: 3/22/2011 A. REQUEST To obtain a Special Use Permit in a C -2, General Commercial, District for the purpose of operating a drive -in or fast food restaurant on 0.02 acre, located at 4309 Starkey Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS No citizens spoke on this petition. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Staff presented the staff report. Ms. Hooker asked how trash disposal would be handled at the site and the type of signage that was proposed. Mr. Ray Craighead stated that the Mill Mountain coffee shop did not generate as much trash as other types of fast food restaurants and that it could be handled by one or two trash cans to be picked up by the "one - arm bandit" trash collection truck. He stated that the proposed signage would be back lit, LED type and would be attached to the canopy area of the building. It is unknown at this time if the monument signage is to be used, but since the sign is non - conforming (due to the location in the setback); staff would need to research if re- facing with a new sign face is an option. Mr. McNeil asked if - the Zoning Ordinance required a dumpster on the site and staff responded that it was not required. D. CONDITIONS 1. The site shall be developed in substantial conformity with the concept plan entitled "Site Layout 4309 Starkey Road" dated January 16, 2011, and prepared by Ray Craighead and Associates. E. COMMISSION ACTION Mr. McNeil recommended approval of the petition and the motion carried 4 -0. Mr. Gary Jarrell was not in attendance. P -1 F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: X Concept Plan X Vicinity flap X Staff Report X Other Philip Thompson, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission Petitioner: Ray Craighead STAFF REPORT Request: To obtain a Special Use Permit in a C -2, General Commercial, District for the purpose of operating a drive -in or fast food restaurant on 0.62 acre Location: 4309 Starkey Road Magisterial Cave Spring District: Suggested 1. The site shall be developed in substantial conformity with the Conditions: concept plan entitled "Site Layout 4309 Starkey Road" dated January 16, 2011, and prepared by Ray Craighead and Associates. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is a request by the petitioner to obtain a Special Use Permit to operate a drive -in and fast food restaurant on the outparcel at the corner of Starkey and Ogden Roads. The 0.62 acre site is currently zoned C -2, General Commercial district. The property is designated as Core on the 2005 Future Land Use map. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines a "Restaurant, drive -in or fast food" as an establishment primarily engaged in the preparation of food and beverages, for either take -out, delivery or table service, served at a counter, a drive -up or drive through service facility or offers curb service. Typical uses include drive -in restaurants or coffee shops. These restaurants are allowed in C -2 zoned districts with a Special Use Permit. The use and design standards for this use require all drive - through windows to comply with the following drive - through facilities standards: • Stacking spaces and lanes for drive - through stations shall not impede on and off site traffic movements, shall not cross or pass through off street parking areas, and shall not create a potentially unsafe condition where crossed by pedestrian access to a public entrance of a building. • Drive through lanes shall be separated from off - street parking areas. Individual lanes shall be striped, marked or otherwise distinctly delineated. • All drive - through facilities shall be provided with a bypass lane with a minimum width of ten (10) feet. • Each stacking space shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet by twenty (20) feet. • Drive -In or Fast Food Restaurant: Six (6) stacking spaces per drive - through window measured from the order board or station. Roanoke County site development review will be required. 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background — This parcel was previously the location of the Bank of Floyd. Topography/Vegetation — This parcel is a flat asphalt lot with curb and guttering, existing parking and drive through facilities, and landscaping. There are several mature trees in the grassy median between the parking areas and the adjoining right of way and properties. Surrounding Neighborhood — This parcel is surrounded completely by General Commercially zoned property on the north and west and by public roads Starkey and Ogden Roads on the east and south. It is located on a parcel that adjoins the southeast corner of the Old Country Plaza which now houses several restaurants, retail stores, personal service businesses and a grocery store (Food Lion). Across Starkey Road are more retail sales and Medical office businesses and across Ogden Road are the Tanglewood Mall property and the Panera Bread restaurant. 3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout /Architecture — This parcel was the location of the Bank of Floyd. The petitioner plans to remodel the fagade of the building but allow the drive through facilities to remain in the present location as shown on the concept plan. Access /Traffic Circulation — Access will be by a right in /right out shopping center entrance to the adjoining Old Country Plaza parcel and a second entrance from one of the driveways into the adjoining parcel. The exit from the parcel will be onto the adjoining Old Country Plaza parcel and then onto Starkey Road. The access to this property from Ogden Road was not clear in the application; therefore staff requested and received a document which verifies the access easement from Ogden and Starkey Roads to this property. There are existing pavement markings on the asphalt directing traffic to the drive through area. Staff has requested additional information to be added to the concept plan to meet the required standards for drive through facilities including the addition of 2 stacking spaces (with dimensions) and the required 10 foot bypass lane. This information will be required to be added during the internal plan review process. Fire & Rescue /Utilities — The Roanoke County Fire Marshall's Office had no overall objection to the proposed idea, however offered two comments. First, fire flow would need to be met for the proposed structure /change of use and the flow would need to be determined and provided to the Fire Marshal's Office. Secondly, the proposed business would require an annual Place of Assembly Permit to be obtained. General Services — Roanoke County General Services stated there will be no impact from this request. Western Virginia Water Authority — The WVWA stated that there are no concerns with the request. 2 VDOT — Virginia Department of Transportation requested that Roanoke County evaluate the need for a traffic impact analysis study for the site. The minimum sight distance would need to be met from the existing entrances. Existing sight distance for the 35 mph speed limit at this site appears to be adequate but field verification should be done and measurements should be taken. Finally, if work is to be done in the right -of -way, a land use permit will be required. Per the applicant supplied numbers for estimated sales of a maximum of approximately 300 transactions per day including the drive through, the submitted information does not merit the need for a TIA study. It should also be noted that no new entrances are proposed and site access will remain the same. Economic Development - The Department of Economic Development supports the reuse of the former Bank of Floyd building, and offers no objections to the special use request. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN This site is in conformance with the Core area Future Land Use Map from the 2005 Comprehensive Plan. The Core designation encourages high intensity urban development, highway- oriented uses. Commercial zoning currently exists, the location is served by an arterial street, and it also is currently served by urban services. The surrounding zoning also supports implementation of the Future Land Use map. 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS This is a request by the petitioner to obtain a Special Use Permit to operate a drive -in and fast food restaurant on the outparcel at the corner of Starkey and Ogden Roads. The 0.62 acre site is currently zoned C -2, General Commercial district. The property is designated as Core on the 2005 Future Land Use Map. The Core designation encourages dense commercial use along major highways. The proposed use of a drive - in or fast food restaurant with a drive through aisle is consistent with uses in the designation. The proposed application generally conforms to the Zoning Ordinance, although final approval is pending site development review. CASE NUMBER: PREPARED BY: HEARING DATES: ATTACHMENTS: 4- 3/2011 Tammi L. Wood PC: 3/1/2011 BOS: 3/22/2011 Application Plat Showing Boundary & As -Built Survey (0.625 ac.) Aerial Map Land Use Zoning Map C -2, General Commercial District Standards Drive -in or Fast Food Restaurant Use &Design Standards 3 CtZAICHEAD 4 A550CIATES Architects, Desi Construction Mana Januar 6, 2011 Count of Roanoke Department of Communit Development and Plannin Division 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke,., VA. 24018 ATTN: Ms. Tammi Wood, Planner I RE: Special Use Re Drive Thru Window 43 09 Starke Road (Tax # 77.19-1.29.02.0000 Roanoke, VA. 24018 Dear Tannni Per our meetin we are re a special use permit to operate the drive thr-u for a fast food restaurant ( Mill Mountain Coffee and Tea ) at the above propert The propert currentl has a three lane drive thru on site as a previous usa of a bankin operation. This re is to allow the use of a drive-thru ( sin lane ) operation at the propert Attached is the paperwork for the propo,sod-special use. Please call with an q uestions. file: 21102 enclosure: Special Use Paperwork Site La Letter for A from Owner Check for $ 40.00 RAY CRAIGHEAD, ARCHITECT * 2721 BRAMBLETON AVENUE, S.W. a P.0, BOX 4662 # ROANOKE, VA, 24015 &(540) 774-5326 Pte - ��a�o �C�l Count of Roanoke Communit Development Plannin & Zonin 5204 Bernard Drive P 0 Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 ALL APPLICANTS Check t of application filed (check all that appl 0 Rezonin )(Special Use ❑ Variance ❑ Waiver ❑ Administrative Appeal ❑ Comp Plan (15.2-2232 Review Applicants name/address w/zip Phone: t)4 6, " - aep ft cry ► A,. rA la4t Work: Cell #: A� -a No ka I VA • 2-44� Fax No.: 64 Owner's name/address w/zip Phone #: 1 4191 le. A- r-La • Work: ?.C$ 2 105 Fax No. � 15 4 JAS VA- Propert Location +$ qp"e P Ma District: FOA49>0.0A Communit Plannin area: Tax Map No.: '7 7.19 -,1 - Zq .6,0,-,P arot!5 Existin Zonin C'� C-I'v C&yWVyt_ Size of parcel(s): Acres: .42 - Existin Land Use: 64Js,1K REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER A" COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (R1S/W/CP) Proposed Zonin Co 02, Proposed Land Use: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and fronta re of the re district? Yes X No ❑ IF N0 A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the re Use T Yes No 11 IF N0 A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezonin re are conditions bein proffered with this re Yes ❑ No ❑ VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (VIWIAA Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke Count Zonin Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zonin Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke Count Zonin Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zonin Map to For Staff Use Onl Date ceived I Received b Application fee: PCARZA date: Placards issued: BOS date: Case Number can I I Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/S/W/CP 'V/AA R/S/W/CP V/AA R/S/NV/CP V/AA Consultation 81/2 x 11 " concept plan Application e ," Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if appfi�cable� Justification --w-ate nd sewer application Ad g rope ta m e rs r r I hereb certif that I am either the owner of the propert or owner's a r contract purchaser and am actin with the know _6� of the owner. 7f owner's Si 2 JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2•2232) REVIEW REQUESTS Applicant L4 The Plannin Commission will stud rezonin special use permit waiver or communit plan (1-5.2-2232) review re to determine the need and justification for the chan in terms of public health, safet and g eneral welfare. Please answer the followin q uestions as thorou as possible. Use additional space if -necessar Please explain how the re ftirthers, the purposes of the Roanoke Count Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the be of the applicable zonin district classification in the Zonin Ordinance. 'hie, zre"4aA--fwn ;'s- �;x-vj 4= L Vk .C41 J� Please explain how the project conforms to the g eneral g uidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke Count Communit Plan. 10I.C. a, a l Lne, hCa4J; oso cmx'.,� ppse' c4v *rr, Y,=. • Please describe the imp i act(s ) of the re on the propert itself, the adjoinin properties, and the surroundin area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, includin water/sewer, roads,, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. UP 1W' Vep. er " AV) 0" CV a peca* a 0 9 JUSTIFICATION FOR VARUNCE REQUEST Applicant K2�?-m Cra- c keoJ Air� I I The of Zonin Appeals is re b Section 15.2-2309 of the Code of Vir to consider the followin factors before a variance can be g ranted. Please read the factors listed below carefull and in y our own words, describe how the re meets each factor. If additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper. 1, The variance shall not be contrar to the public interest and shall be in harmon with the intended spirit and purpose of the Zonin Ordinance. a�� 2. The strict application of the zonin ordinance would produce undue hardship; a hardship that approaches confiscation ( as distin f a special privile or convenience and would prohibit or unreasonabl restrict the use of the propert ")A- 3. The hardship is not shared b other properties in the same zonin district or vicinit Such hardships should be addressed b the Board of Supervisors as amendments to the Zonin Ordinance. 4. The variance will not be of a substantial detriment to the adjacent properties or the character of the district. yI Ja JUSTIFICATION FOR ADNHNISTRATIVE APPEAL RE Applicant Wz.#. Crau % Please respond to the followin as thorou as possible. If additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper. 1 . Reasons for appeal: ��d 2. Evidence supportin claim: oy CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall g raphicall y depict the land use chan development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address an potential land use or desi issues arisin from the re In such cases involvin rezonin the applicant ma proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the propert and b so doin correct an deficiencies that ma not be mana b Count permittin re The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is re prior to the issuance of a buildin permit. Site plan and buildin permit procedures ensure compliance with State and Count development re and ma re chan to the initial concept plan. Unless limitin conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezonin or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan ma be altered to the extent permitted b the zonin district and other re A concept plan is re with all rezonin special use permit, waiver, communit plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared b a professional site planner. The level of detail ma var dependin on the nature of the re The Count Plannin Division staff ma exempt some of the items or su the addition of extra items, but the followin are considered minimum: ALL ,APPLICANTS a. Applicant name and name of development Date, scale and north arrow c. Lot size in acres or s feet and dimensions d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke Count tax map numbers of ad properties e. Ph features such as g round cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. f The zonin and land use of all adjacent properties g . All propert lines and easements h. All buildin existin and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and hei woo' 1. Location, widths and names of all existin or platted streets or other public wa within or adjacent to the development j. Dimensions and locations of all drivewa parkin spaces and loadin spaces Additional information re for REZONING and SPECL41 USE PERMIT APPLICANTS 01A. • k. Existin utilities (water, sewer, storm drains ) and connections at the site v` 1. An drivewa entrance s/ex its, curb openin and crossovers VJ1A m. Topo map in a suitable scale and contour 'intervals n. Approximate street g rades and site distances at intersections .� o. Locations of all adjacent fire h p. An proffered conditions at the site and how the are addressed q . If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule Lre complete. 1/0/11 Date 3i Communit Developmen t Plannin & Zonin Division POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The followin is a list of potentiall hi traffic- g eneratin g land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed anal of the existin and proposed traffic pertinent to y our rezonin subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit re If y our re involves one of the items on the ensuin list, we recommend that y ou meet with a Count planner, the Count traffic en and/or Vir Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that ma need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite y our application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the Count staff and VDO T reserve the ri to re a traffic stud at an time, as deemed necessar Hi Traffic-Generatin Land Uses: • Sin residential subdivisions, Multi-famil residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwellin units • Restaurant (with or without drive-throu windows) • Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash • Retail shop/Shoppin center • Offices (includin financial institutions, g eneral, medical, etc.) • Re public facilities • Educational/Recreational facilities • Reli assemblies • Hotel/Motel • Golf course • Hospital/Nursin home/Clinic • Industrial site • Da care center • Bank • Non-specific use re Road Network Situations: • Development ad to/with access onto/within 500-ft of intersection of a roadwa classified as an arterial road (e. Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc) • For new phases or chan to a development where a previousl submitted traffic stud is more than two (2) y ears old and roadwa conditions have chan si • When re to evaluate access issues • Development with in on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widenin improvements, etc. ( i.e. on Lon Ran Transportation Plan, Six-Yr Road Plan, etc.) • Development in an area where there is a known existin traffic and/or safet problem • Development would potentiall ne impact existin traffic si • Substantial departure from the Communit Plan • An site that is expected to g enerate over one hundred (100) trips durin the peak hour of the traffic g enerator or the peak hour on the ad streets, or over seven hundred fift (750 trips in an avera da Effective date; April 19 2005 7 �;OAIV Communit Development Plannin & Zonin Division 1838 NOTICE To APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke Count Plannin Commission reserves the ri to continue a Rezonin Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearin If it is the opinion of the ma of the Plannin Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearin that sufficient time was not available for plannin staff and/or an outside referral a to ade evaluate and provide written comments and su on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearin then the Plannin Commission ma vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessar reviewin parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and su to be included in a written memorandum b plannin staff to the Plannin Comn-iission. The Plannin Commission shall consult with plannin staff to determine if a continuance ma be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke Count Plannin Commission reserves the ri to continue a Rezonin Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the Count Traffic En or staff from the Vir Department of Transportation re further traffic anal and/or a traffic impact stud that would be beneficial in makin a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further stud is provided as P art of this application packa This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessar reviewin parties to evaluate the re traffic anal and/or traffic impact stud and to provide written comments and/or su to the plannin staff and the Plannin Commission. If a continuance is war-ranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newl scheduled public hearin date. Effective date; April 19,, 2005 17AIV6 N am f Petition am I Peti6ener's Si Date 6 CRAIGHEAD 1 4 E A550CIATES Architects, Desi Construction Mana ��°�S � t� f�� : �41.4�s tZ.e► �s T �G ' 2 � �l31lX� c� Stz�: 2�1�j ��`- Nei ev- W4WdftS - Al=ro � of F�Ro.�R�I'� �SJF�.sza I V f 7i. 45,J&4 ELI-T % , Promurf - 7� �kF -Kw6� �k 2sL? EX. }aa �,� sjuco-g�ir -9 rte Orr . K Ap OK �,T� t4LYo3T Q�`1 sTaR� � t1L.�l1 �LG A4 XO-ep RAY CRAIGHEAD, ARCHITECT • 2721 BRAMBLETON AVENUE, S.W. • P.O. BOX 4662 • ROANOKE, VA, 24015 (540) 774-5326 BANK OF FLOYD January 3, 2011 Ray Craighead Craighead & Associates Architect 3535 Brambleton Road Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Cllr. Craighead: Henry A. Log President and COO P.O. BOX 215 - FLOYD, VIRGINIA 24091 • TELEPHONE (540) 145 -4191 * FAX (540) 745 -4133 E-mail: HLogue @bankoffloyd.com Please use this letter as permission from the Bank of Floyd to submit an application for the use permit to convert the existing drive -thru to a fast food restaurant drive -thru on the property located at 4309 Starkey Road, Roanoke, Virginia 24018. It is understood that your office will be responsible for any cost associated with the application process. If the sale of the building does not close for any reason you agree to withdraw the application and assume any cost associated with doing so. Please let me know if you need any additional information from the Bank of Floyd. cer ly R Hen A, L e President & CEO HAUavb CD �- r G Q �L3 40� � w" a cD � nnna•sv0aco•o�dns�9eoro�+aoz�:� � a— Y I N r OU i n 3MON Vol] :DK:f aaro T . WOJ'=3dN3ciswn 1&iivvV IIVW 1 ut Ot7F VIIWDNIA '!`IONVON .OZ = ..L 910-1'0 tot-51 :Xvj 69907'X08 'O'd S 13�It�t S� J�3h� S�I3�h ; ll T JI�: a7YOS rON WAOO L Lt t - t _i lilt S) :3NOHd M5 'inNIAt' NO .1 18WVMH t -cl()b •D'd `S3.LY DOSS 1` N3(]S� A flrl 1700Z'6 11bJdV giro �'',z�� $cc> yiR 2 a c ; Ov U � Qj Wwa�tW 4nviy o4x U $ c ti D w O ? Z W�`y <z I �e E-+ A �' `� EL In try 4 �p p - i wwW�'�V cc cN WC 20t��W►4.. :_�' I - _ � +4 D4 W � �.I Cy �` °��$ w m RS �•• Q O Csa L U O •�L� D 0 LU a W °e_'^rn fi x' ` °� �,'�`., z r:�' N'� ''d � xz`"a,.� � $ •�$ .�zoe� ��4 � W �� � .� fY ���• � C � L O ° ��►� W����f` Wq ,U_�uz h N $ d s �9 c �* -� C!, O �, o rs l�pl7�r�c�'4��$ U ti E-+ O ?- �+ O Lu z vs W a �¢ tXaca�.'a'` z x a a� "c °� Z x N E - . �I a �O CI Q Ca �y 2 Ow �� +7.cr DIQ .z�Z�'� -a �4 W ay S o 0►ypd eQ vl�' oa�3oew�y - Ir. Q.x a $ Lif N (1) F� Q ,y v U � ae � N to a w 2i � `� „s. z R 6— b .� 3} `" eri �~ C!? O CL N Q Z Q D _ , n3$ .,W ` W E+ O N LV D cr- ��S z r ` ��_ zW n 5 9��o c� -W� z Q .R ., � Z •C/] ~• Z m Z Z W 3 m �Sa°�'e� x 1z w$g� q A I � a t�n� $ aea ° +$a +nw"�= v�i�ovv_n Na a� '� '� E�'� m lit W �0 S4 Q 'zer, o��4cn��r ��n� am z . a m Y m CIO k� y � z � o r� -- - t9IJ �d17st1 Ui0� - ���DCO Ii _ I Wo I w '- Od 74 Ln � �Q'J'O a`s'sp ' H _ s� 1 w B9e gi p! td W tom •' l - r tp6 av3kd340 Q W e tK3 W to J L �i 1 ti . �Tf .• `• " I �ibf I � 4 � w � w D 1 T► J r� m U s� �f N � Y p - w r te., ti ` }� x w � ►_ 2! CwS -Z ma a WQ CID Qw QZ ix • 1 ' a ny S? o ° ►. � 'iS b `' cs , •' r T I w►�j C� z O Z 4 0 O W a S .'r' z o co n Q •r $ z 15 o e V3 w tY 3" -►�,• 4: rai0.W_�Wawww n W Oq �I� '�'• _ 1 i 4 ~ �€ S ��gCw.�e Q 1.�� Q q w 0 O� W I le / �` Y:• (/� // - I L. (I r Q- p � 6c. W e UG]a�J"1W +.'� QCC OxW :z ics SY3c'3aL4$ 1 '�• �':'' r a ® I En .4 ? a�$oz°n°~ wa a a8 Lm 2 '� . . s . - y� 2 a0 a W 2 4 a qQc LL] 2 K h S :►,. �.> C�, `• •r .. L. i u°i 2 6 Z O m a •-3 U V y y U r r W cn iS I O� C I U QC�2w� Q w H l�,I 4 tiw I Q :3 t`p �� - - )eaQC°W�OVQ: pz v'o4e ^^� U L v� I Cd tC�n `'� q � 'n ,.s v � V � � z z V 4, a - 4 Q L.L W o I m O z x e0 _H C Q q q. ma �� uf.,no a" WQ Q q ax q� °v �C ti' v� o v a. En ci 0.mawe +-Q �o w ID o Qua rr K 8 _ �' e Q �• CL e ° wLtOW -cc�4wt�Q z w ~ C? 4 ,2.5. 2 � l �w !�¢«- w�g �u.� L I �� -� .96. .mob "t' �� p36llCW'LE•i a� � �` 1 l p (311 - [D, 6.6 •� ® II 22 '� s N 7.5 E %. ■� l tr] �t5VKgz�� OC�e� OCl f 8 S't z a v��^uln2��k+� w Z.0i ! H e 42'S� E a o x z '6 o L am, '� u "t .t $ a o N X51 43� l v Q O o o c? °c to IL> e� ! l 1 N RON 1272• . � 1$5 1 'l 17 w � ' < � � � �., � c � a Q 'o o c Q Q 00 "K a -:c .c " 20 PG 1756�fl i L pzZZ�- ^ '�'�- n �' x 5�� � ' gt2� 1I 1 � } de� Q www QU4 W wa j - �• 1 H �+5 �aa��y�yW jO - v w i en cn v - 1 i w e '�' K Q2.K[ C Z Z W W C w � � ►+, a t� �., � �., � � . Nwl ab: f `D^�'N Wn vIn 44 vGoti Applicants Name: Ray Craighead N Existing Zoning: C2 Roanoke County Department of Proposed Zoning: C2S Tax Map Number. . 077.19-01-29.02-0000 Community Development Magisterial District: Cave Spring Area: 0.62 Acres 12 January, 2011 Scale: 1 " = 200' = Principal Industrial Roanoke County Department of Community Development Applicants Name: Ray Craighead N Existing Zoning: C2 Proposed Zoning: C2S Tax Map Number: 077.19 -01 -29.02 -0000 Magisterial District: Cave Spring Area: 0.62 Acres 12 January, 2011 Scale: 1 " = 200' Applicants Name: Ray Craighead N Existing Zoning: C2 Roanoke County Department of Proposed Zoning: C2S Tax Map Number. . 077.19-01-29.02-0000 Community Development Magisterial District: Cave Spring Area: 0.62 Acres 12 January, 2011 Scale: 1 " = 200' SEC. 30 -54. C -2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30 -54 -1. Purpose. (A) The purpose of this district is to provide locations for a variety of commercial and service related activities within the urban service area serving a community of several neighborhoods or large areas of the county. This district is intended for general application throughout the county. General Commercial Districts are most appropriately found along major arterial thoroughfares which serve large segments of the county's population. The G2 district permits a wide variety of retail and service related uses. Land uses permitted in this district are generally consistent with the recommendations set forth in the Transition and Core land use categories of the Comprehensive Development Plan. Site development regulations are designed to ensure compatibility with adjoining land uses. Sec. 30 -54 -2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk ( *) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards are listed in Article IV, Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses. 1. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment Home Beauty /Barber Salon Home Occupation, Type I Multi - Family Dwelling Two - Family Dwelling 2. Civic Uses Administrative Services Clubs Cultural Services Day Care Center Educational Facilities, College /University Educational Facilities, Primary /Secondary Family Day Care Home Guidance Services Park and Ride Facility Post Office Public Assembly Public Parks and Recreational Areas Safety Services * Utility Services, Minor 3. Office Uses Financial Institutions General Office Medical Office Laboratories 4. Commercial Uses Agricultural Services Antique Shops Automobile Dealership, New Automobile Repair Services, Minor Automobile Rental /Leasing Automobile Parts /Supply, Retail Bed and Breakfast Boarding House Business Support Services Business or Trade Schools Commercial Indoor Entertainment Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation Commercial Outdoor Entertainment Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation Communications Services Construction Sales and Services Consumer Repair Services Funeral Services Garden Center * Gasoline Station Hospital Hotel /Motel /Motor Lodge Kennel, Commercial Pawn Shop Personal Improvement Services Personal Services Restaurant, General Restaurant, Family Retail Sales Studio, Fine Arts Veterinary Hospital /Clinic 5. Industrial Uses Recycling Centers and Stations 6. Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower Parking Facility * (B) The following uses are allowed only by Special Use Permit pursuant to Section 30- 19. An asterisk ( *) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards are listed in Article IV, Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses. 1. Civic Uses Adult Care Residences Halfway House Life Care Facility Nursing Home Religious Assembly Utility Services, Major 2. Commercial Uses Automobile Dealership, Used Automobile Repair Services, Major Car Wash * Commercial Indoor Amusement Convenience Store Dance Hall Equipment Sales and Rental Manufactured Home Sales Mini- warehouse * Outpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Center Recreational Vehicle Sales and Service Restaurant, Drive -in and Fast Food Surplus Sales Truck Stop * 3. Industrial Uses Custom Manufacturing Landfill, Rubble * Transportation Terminal 4. Miscellaneous Uses Broadcasting Tower Outdoor Gatherings (Ord. No. 82493 -8, § 2, 8- 24 -93; Ord. No. 022796 -14, § 1, 2- 27 -96; 042297 -14, § 1, 4- 22-97; Ord. No. 042799 -11, § 2, 4- 27 -99; Ord. No. 102803 -15, § 2, 10- 28 -03) Sec. 30 -54 -3. Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. (A) Minimum lot requirements. 1. Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system; a. Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet). b. Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 2. Lots served by either public sewer or water, or both: a. Area: 15,000 square feet. b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. (B) Minimum setback requirements. 1. Front yard: a. Principal structures: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building line. b. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line. 2. Side yard: None. 3. Rear yard: a. Principal structures: 15 feet. b. Accessory structures: 3 feet. 4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. (C) Maximum height of structures. 1. Height limitations: a. Principal structures: When adjoining property zoned R -1 or R -2, 45 feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased, provided each required side and rear yard adjoining the R -1 or R -2 district is increased two feet for each foot in height over 45 feet. In all locations the height is unlimited unless otherwise restricted by this ordinance. b. Accessory structures: actual height of principal structure. (D) Maximum coverage. 1. Building coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. 2. Lot coverage: 90 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 62293 -12, § 10, 6- 22 -93) Sec. 30- 85 -24. Restaurant, Drive -In or Fast Food. (A) General standards: 1. All drive - through windows shall comply with the standards for drive - through facilities contained in Section 30- 91 -10. 2. A special use permit shall not be required for any fast food restaurant that is located within a shopping center (excluding outparcels) and which does not propose drive -in or curb service. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 22, 2011 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A DRIVE IN OR FAST FOOD RESTAURANT ON A 9.62 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED AT 4399 STARKEY ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 77.19 -1- 29.92) CAVE SPRING MAGisTERIAL DISTRICT, UPON THE PETITION OF RAY CRAIGHEAD WHEREAS, Ray Craighead has filed a petition for a special use permit for a drive in or fast food restaurant to be located at 4309 Starkey Road (Tax Map No. 77.19 -1- 29.02) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 1, 2011; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on February 22, 2011; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on March 22, 2011. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Ray Craighead for a drive in or fast food restaurant on 0.02 acres located at 4309 Starkey Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 2005 Community Plan, as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2 -2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and that it shall have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood or community, and said special use permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: Page 1 of 2 ay The site shall be developed in substantial conformity with the concept plan entitled "site Layout 4369 Starkey Road" dated January 16, 2611, and prepared by Ray Craighead and Associates. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. P -2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY March 22, 2011 Ordinance authorizing amendments and additions to the Roanoke County Design Handbook to assist in the implementation of Chapter 30 of the Roanoke County Code (Zoning Ordinance) pertaining to private road standards and creating new standards for sidewalks, shared use paths, private trails and bicycle accommodations. Megan Cronise Principal Planner B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator�QO"" COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This ordinance authorizes amendments to and - the inclusion of additional standards in the Roanoke County Design Handbook. Intended to compliment the Zoning Ordinance by illustrating certain design concepts, the Design Handbook was also designed to contain standards outside of, yet still related to, the Zoning Ordinance. The Design Handbook was written to be useful for County citizens, design professionals, County staff, the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors. The additional regulations proposed for incorporation into the Design Handbook include standards for private roads, sidewalks, shared use paths, private trails and bicycle accommodations. It is intended to be updated with additional information as needed. The Planning Commission held its public hearing on the adoption of the Design Handbook on January 4, 2011. The Planning Commission voted unanimously on January 18, 2011 to forward the Design Handbook to the Board of Supervisors with a favorable recommendation. A work session was held with the Board of Supervisors on February 22, 2011, and the Board of Supervisors approved the first reading on March 8, 2011. Page 1 of 2 FISCAL IMPACT None ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve the second reading of an ordinance to amend the Roanoke County Design Handbook. 2. Take no action at this time. STAFF RECOMMENDATION County staff recommends that the Board approve the second reading of this ordinance. Page 2 of 2 Roanoke Count Y 9 a 1838 Design Handbook Adopted May 26,2009 Recommendation ofApproval from Planning Commission January 18,2011 (Page intentionally blank) Tab o f Con tents March 22, 2011 � i ELEMENT PAGE Chapter 1: Site Design Section 1.1 Site Layout Example 1 -1 Chapter 2: Landscaping Section 2.1 Screening Materials 2 -1 2.2 Landscaped Buffer Yards 2 -3 2.3 Right -of -Way Planting Strips 2 -8 2.4 Landscaped Medians within Parking Areas 2 -10 2.5 Recommended Native/ Naturalized Plant List 2 -11 2.6 Highly Invasive Species List 2 -16 2.7 Native Plant Guide for Stormwater Management Areas 2 -17 Chapter 3: Transportation Section 3.1 Parking Area Design 3 -1 3.2 Typical Paving 3 -5 3.3 Permeable Paving 3 -5 3.4 Sidewalks 3 -9 3.5 Shared Use Paths 3-10 3.6 Trails 3-12 3.7 Bicycle Accommodations 3 -15 3.8 Private Roads 3-16 Appendices: A Board of Supervisors Ordinances A -1 B Sidewalk, Shared Use Path and Private Road Standards B -1 References Roanoke County Design Handbook (Page intentionally blank) Chapter 1: Site Desi Chapter 1: Site Desi Section 1.1 - Site La Fi 1.1-1 Site La Example March 22, 2011 1 1-1 'ING R-3 PERTY ZYARDB2 Roanoke Count Desi Handbook 1 -2 March 22, 2011 (Page intentionally blank) Chapter 1: Site Design Roanoke County Design Handbook Chapter 2: Landscaping Chapter 2: Landscaping Section 2.1 - Screening Materials Figure 2.1 -1 Stockade Fence Figure 2.1 -2 Decorative Masonry Wall _- March 22, 2011 2 -1 Roanoke County Design Handbook Figure 2.1- 3Brick Wall 2-2 � March 22, 2011 Fi 2.1-4 Three (3) Foot Tall Earth Berm GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF BERM Chapter 2: Landscapin 3' BERM HEIGHT Fi 2.1-5 Six (6) Foot Tall Earth Berm GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF BERM . ........ .. .. I I Ed I — I II — III — III — III — II — I I I — I II — I I 36' 6' BERM HEIGHT Fi 2.1-6 Var Hei Earth Berm spannin two different g rade elevations 3' BERM HEIGHT GRADE ELEVATION #1 1: 9 TOP OF BERM � III - II — III - EEI &BERM HEIGHT GRADE ELEVATION #2 Roanoke Count Desi Handbook Chapter 2: Landscapin March 22, 2011 2-3 Section 2.2 - Landscaped Buffer Yards Fi 2.2-1T A Buffer "Row" should not be construed as meanin that the plants must be uniforml planted. TYPE A BUFFER OPTION 1 20' Buffer For ever 75' consistin of: One row of lar deciduous trees (3) One row of lar ever shrubs (12-14) One row of lar deciduous shrubs (16-18) OPTION 2- 15' Buffer For every 75' consistin of'. One row of small deciduous trees (5 One row of lar ever shrubs (12-14) 6' Screenin 1 751 91 W, =1110 LVA I XTITA ELEVATION Roanoke Count Desi Handbook 2-4 March 22, 2011 Fi 2.2-2 T B Buffer Chapter 2: Landscapin "Row" should not be construed as meanin that the plants must be uniforml planted. TYPE B BUFFER OPTION 1 30' Buffer For ever 100' consistin of, One row of lar ever trees 5) One row of lar ever shrubs (16-18) One row of lar deciduous shrubs (22-24) OPTION 2: 20"' Buffer For ever 100' consistin of, One row of lar deciduous trees (4) One row of lar ever shrubs ( 16-18 ) 6' Screenin PLAN VIE ELEVATIC Roanoke Count Desi Handbook Chapter 2: Landscapin Fi 2.2-3 T C Buffer March 22, 2011 2-5 "Row" should not be construed as meanin that the plants must be uniforml planted. TYPE C BUFFER OPTION 1 40' Buffer For ever 100` consistin of, One row of lar ever trees (5) One row of small deciduous trees (6) One row of lar ever shrubs (16-18) One row of lar deciduous shrubs (22-24) OPTION 2- 30' Buffer For ever 100' consistin of, One row of lar deciduous trees (3) One row of lar ever shrubs (16-18) One row of lar deciduous shrubs ( 22-24 ) 6' Screenin :)LAN VIEW -EVATION Roanoke Count Desi Handbook 2-6 � March 22, 2011 Fi 2.2 T D Buffer Chapter 2: Landscapin "Row" should not be construed as meanin that the plants must be uniforml planted. TYPE D BUFFER OPTION 1, 50' Buffer For ever 1 GO' consistin of One row of lar ever trees ( 5 ) Two rows of small deciduous trees, two different species ( 6-7 per row) OPTION 2.- 35' Buffer For ever 1 00 consistin of One row of lar deciduous trees (3) One row of small ever trees (6-7) 6' Screenin PLAN VIEW ELEVATIOI` Roanoke Count Desi Handbook Chapter 2: Landscapin Fi 2.2-5 T E Buffer March 22, 2011 2-7 "Row" should not be construed as meanin that the plants must be uniforml planted. TYPE E BUFFER OPTION 1-. 75' Buffer For ever 100' consistin of: One row of lar deciduous trees ( 3 ) One row of lar ever trees ( 5 ) One row of small deciduous trees ( 7 ) 100 1 OPTION 2: 50' Buffer For ever 100' consistin of: One row of lar deciduous trees ( 3) One row of small ever trees ( 6 ) One row of small deciduous trees ( 6-7 ) 6' Screenin PLAN VIEW LEV Roanoke Count Desi Handbook 2-8 March 22, 2011 Section 2.3 - Ri -of -Wa Plantin Strips Fi 2.3-1 T Plantin Strip Chapter 2: Landscapin 'RIGHT OF WAY Lar Shrubs Lar Deciduous Tree 0' Roanoke Count Desi Handbook New or Expanded PLANTING Development STRIP: or 10 Reconfi Minimum Parkin Width Area Chapter 2: Landscapin Fi 2.3-2 Plantin Strip with Overhead Power Lines When Overhead Powerlines Are Present Small Deciduous Tree Lar Shrubs March 22, 2011 2-9 409 Roanoke Count Desi Handbook New or Expanded PLANTING Development STRIP: RIGHT OF or 10 WAY Reconfi Minimum Parkin Width Area 2-10 March 22, 2011 Section 2.4 - Landscaped Medians Fi 2.4-1 Landscaped Median within a Parkin Area Chapter 2: Landscapin SIDEWALK LIGHTS PLANTING ISLAND LANDSCAPED MEDIAN BENCH TRASH RECEPTACLE Roanoke Count Desi Handbook Chapter 2: Landscaping Section 2.5 - Recommended Native /Naturalized Plant List Chart 2.5 -1 Large Deciduous Trees: March 22, 2011 2 -11 LATIN NAME COMMON NAME w w � F'' w 09 c � z 0-4 w c N o w CZ r4 � ,� a 0-4 z �� <t C9 44 � z w w A w z W-4 Acerrubrum Red Maple X X Acersaccharum Sugar Maple X Aesculus flava Yellow Buckeye X Betula alleghensis Yellow Birch X Betula lenta Sweet Birch X Betula nigra River Birch X Carya glabra Pignut Hickory X Diospyros virginiana Persimmon X Fagus grandifolia American Beech X Fraxinus americana White Ash X X Fraxinus pensylvanica Green Ash X X Liauidambar styraciflua Sweetgum X Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar X Magnolia acuminate Cucumber Magnolia X X Nyssa sylvatica Black Gum X X Prunus serrulata Oriental Cherry X Quercus alba White Oak X Quercus coccinea Scarlet Oak X Quercus falcate Southern Red Oak X Quercus pal ustris Pin Oak X Quercus rubra Red Oak X Quercus stellata Post Oak X Quercus velutina Black Oak X Tilia cordata Littleleaf Linden X X Tilia americana American Linden X Roanoke County Design Handbook 2 -12 March 22, 2011 Chart 2.5 - 2 Small Deciduous Trees: Chapter 2: Landscaping LATIN NAME COMMON NAME F'' H w w Qn z z w w Qn w z A �� �� a z z H z�' � [� -,-�+ atA w �; ZA w� z w O Amelanchier arborea Downy Serviceberry X X X X Amelanchier canadensis Canada Serviceberry X X X X Amelanchier laevis Smooth Serviceberry X X X X Asimina triloba Paw Paw Tree X Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud X X X X Chionanthus virginicus Fringetree X X X X Cornus alternifolia Alternate Leaf Dogwood X X X X Cornus florida Flowering Dogwood X X X X Crateagus crus -galli Cockspur Hawthorne X X X Crataegus flava October Hawthorne X X X Halesia tetraptera Carolina Silverbell X X X Monus rubra Red Mulberry X X X Ostra virginiana Eastern Hop Hornbeam Prunus americana American Wild Plum X X X X X Rhusglabra Smooth Sumac X X X Salix nigra Black Willow X X Syringa vulgaris Common Lilac X X Roanoke County Design Handbook Chapter 2: Landscaping Chart 2.5 - 3 Large Evergreen Trees: March 22, 2011 2 -13 Chart 2.5 -4 Large Evergreen Shrubs & Small Evergreen Trees: w w N o � z LATIN NAME COMMON NAME � N E., � z z z w z A CZ ,, " w � w w w x N z � w A C9 ,� < w z Ilex opaca American Holly X X X X Juniperus virginiana Eastern Red Cedar X X Magnolia grandiflora Southern Magnolia X X X X Picea glauca White Spruce X X X X Picea abies Norway Spruce X X X X Picea orientalis Oriental Spruce X X X X Pinus bungeana Lacebark Pine X X Pinus echinata Shortleaf Pine X X X X Pinus koraiensis Korean Pine X X X X Pinus virginiana Virginia Pine X X Thuja occidentalis White Cedar X X Tsuga canadensis Eastern Hemlock X X Tsuga caroliniana Carolina Hemlock X X Chart 2.5 -4 Large Evergreen Shrubs & Small Evergreen Trees: Roanoke County Design Handbook w o z LATIN NAME COMMON NAME H z z a z z a s V w w w w � z C4� H z tA z z Buxus sempervirens Common Boxwood X X X X Camellia oleifera Tea Oil Camellia X Chamaecyparis obtuse Hinoki Falsecypress X X X Ilex x attenuate Foster's Holly X X X X Ilex verticillata Winterberry Holly X X X X Junipe chinensis Chinese Juniper X X X X Magnolia virginiana Sweet Bay Magnolia X Picea glauca 'conica' Dwarf White Spruce X X X X Thuja occidentalis Eastern Arborvitae X X X X Roanoke County Design Handbook 2 -14 ' March 22, 2011 Chart 2.5 - 5 Large Deciduous Shrubs: Chapter 2: Landscaping LATIN NAME COMMON NAME w H E-+ W E z OEM Z W V Q o Z a0-4 Z Z 0-.4' � [� - � - �+ a En OEM a -et V Z A W W z O w Acer palmatum Japanese Maple X Aronia pyrifolia Red Chokeberry X X Callicarpa americana American Beautyberry X X Calycanthus floridus Eastern Sweetshrub X X Chaenomeles x superb Flowering Quince X X X Clethra alnifolia Summersweet X X X Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood X X X X Corn us sericea Redosier Dogwood X X X X Cornus alba 'Sibirica' Tatarian Dogwood X X X X Co tin us coggygria Smokebush X X X Fothergilla major Large Fothergilla X X Hydrangea paniculata Panicle Hydrangea X X Hydrangea auercifolia Oak Leaf Hydrangea X X Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle X X X X Morella pensylvanica Northern Bayberry X X X Physocarpus opulifolius Ninebark X X X Rhododendron calendulaceum Flame Azalea X X X X Rhododendron Pinxterbloom Azalea X X X X Rhododendron prinophyllum Roseshell Azalea X X X X Rhus aromatic Fragrant Sumac X X X Salix purpurea 'Nana' Dwarf Purpleosier Willow X X Sambucus nigra 'Variegata' Variegated Elderberry X X X X Spiraea prunifolia Bridalwreath Spirea X X X X Viburnum carlesii Korean Spice Viburnum X X X X Viburnum burkwoodii Burkwood Viburnum X X X X Viburnum juddii Judd Viburnum X X X X Viburnum dentatum Arrowood Viburnum X X X X Viburnum macrocephalum Large Flowered Chinese X X X X Viburnum nudum Possumhaw Viburnum X X X X Viburnum acerifolium Mapleleaf Viburnum X X X X Weigela florida Flowering Weigela X X X X Roanoke County Design Handbook Chapter 2: Landscaping March 22, 2011 2 -15 Chart 2.5 -6 Groundcover &Small Shrubs (Evergreen &Deciduous): Roanoke County Design Handbook LATIN NAME COMMON NAME F'' z w z z w z w H w w z w w z A �� H z�' �; �� �[� -,-�+ ZA w� O Qn Qn a atA Cotoneasterdammeri 'Coral Coral Beauty Cotoneaster X X X Beau ty Festuca glauca 'Boulder Blue' Boulder Blue Fescue X X Hosta Hosta, Plantain Lily X X Hypericum reptans Creeping St. John's Wort X X X X Iberis sempervirens 'Little Little Gem Candytuft X X X Gem' Juniperus horizontalis Creeping Juniper X X Liriope muscari Liriope X X Pachysandra terminalis Pachysandra X X X Phlox subulata Moss Pink X X X Sedum Stonecrop X X Yucca filamentosa Yucca X X Roanoke County Design Handbook 2 -16 March 22, 2011 Section 2.6 — Highly Invasive Species Chapter 2: Landscaping It should be noted the list is not regulatory in nature, and thus does not prohibit the use of the listed plant species. Chart 2.6 -1 Highly Invasive Species List LATIN NAME COMMON NAME Ailanthus altissima Tree -of- Heaven Alliaria petiolata Garlic Mustard Alternanthera philoxeroides Alligator Weed Ampelopsis brevipedunculata Porcelain -Berry Carex kobomugi Asiatic Sand Sedge Celastrus orbiculata Oriental Bittersweet Centaurea dubia Short - Fringed Knapweed Centaurea biebersteinii Spotted Knapweed Cirsium arvense Canada Thistle Dioscorea oppositifolia Chinese Yam Elaeagnus umbellata Autumn Olive Euonymus alata Winged Burning Bush Hydrilla verticillata Hydrilla Imperata cylindrica Cogon Grass Lespedeza cuneata Chinese Lespedeza Ligustrum sinense Chinese Privet Lonicera japonica Japanese Honeysuckle Lonicera morrowii Morrow's Honeysuckle Lonicera standishii Standish's Honeysuckle Lythrum salicaria Purple Loosestrife Microstegium vimineum Japanese Stilt Grass Murdannia keisak Aneilema Myriophyllum aquaticum Parrot Feather Myriophyllum spicatum European Water- Milfoil Phragmites australis Common Reed Polygonum cuspidatum Japanese Knotweed Polygonum perfoliatum Mile -A- Minute Pueraria montana Kudzu Vine Ranunculus ficaria Lesser Celandine Rosa multiflora Multiflora Rose Rubus phoenicolasius Wineberry Sorghum halepense Johnson -Grass Roanoke County Design Handbook N O N N U C� � C) a-j ct O C/] . r .. r b�A O U z C3 Pftw z 0� o� O 4-j M N O � V � 1 0� Z � O z ^ C Q x cu N E cu O 95 cu C/1 N �r V cn � a) 75 ct $"-' 4-J z cn ct U CA ct p a) .� 75 ct j cn 75 V) ct 75 + 75 cu u _ a) a) • � to cn $�. U 'O ° ct ct 4-J cn N 4-0 LO 4' ct Q. E-r CL) o °' O '� O a ° Ct ct .ct ° ° o ct U 7z C ct 'u o a bA a ct �' `) c� V) Q, cn O .� `� U p.. �, �, O s . ° �-' '�, '� 'O '� O 10 p O cu ct V) z ct ' O n o �, ¢. p .� o U o� o O O � O v� o •� � a, o w o 0 0 ct ;: 5 ;z ;Z a a, ,� p O U a U cn 75 o ct V3 bA E a O p >1 v3 Ln ct O +J O 75 bA U �, bz � cu `r' ct vi "O c ct ° ct ct O a) =1 ct cn Piz to ct � 75 • � C ,� �O w c .V bjO ct bn _ I ct b�A bb O bA r. `V O •'-" p O vi O U O .,._, 'r II . 4L - � L2 U � 1 /� •� J /H 1 lc• /H 1 p �••I U /H 1 �••I 4-J /H }� 'C• ' V U Ic W h Y� bD bD V p b0 UO to b-O to to U b.A to a) bD bD > O v ,o 64 W O O �, O >, O �, a a cu a N a N a O O O � o � H CU ° a) a, a, a, a, ° a) a) a) a) a) ° ° a) P-M a) a) a) a) a) w a) a) a) �5 a) a) �5 a, a, a� a) a) a) a) (1) u u u Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q O Ln Ln M d' Ln d' in d' M �.D `o Ln L1') Ll7 d" N M d" M L1') L1') d'' M N Ln Ln d" ct E ^ ^ ct ^ 4 cd cd • cn bA ,� ct i••� • ,� '— p �, a) � • ^+ � co a--J v > -I p s ., O ^ p e --11 �--� O a) ct O •.� O p N cn � x .4 V/ - 4 ct x •O bn U cu ct bn ct cn cn L-1 '~ cn cn a) U bA a) v � � ct ct -J U � ci U � U � z U :=; � c +' Q., .,� u O' o ci o a v O O a Q V 0 ct 1 .. cu cu O N N O ° O ° ' U 4 O ' r" p ct c� O c� a) a) O '—" .-- ' ' C5 ' O V bbn a) .--r E-' '. r . O � c O o Q ct U U y 4-1 ct aj ct aj ct C aj ct aj ct aj ct b.0 ° a C4 a � \ � M M Ln m 4 M Ln m O a :� U o ct a, b.A a ct 4 a, bD U . ¢' .� � p b.0 U ct �--� ct ct ct ct '—' 4-0 ct aj ,--� �--� N ,� 4-J V) v) O O • � p O 3 O 0 4-5 O O � .� N p O O o 4 b�--A Ln • O O O cd o ,� ct a a; o o � � U ; o ct o O p c� o a �, E- E- 4 fZ. v) G=* a ct Gs. ct C4 Gs. Gs. E V cn a ,� En Ct vi V; O ct [t ct ..� U ct CU cz cn Ls.. C O - 05 c t O p N by = O S'' N c U cn O Q c0 U 75 -a U '+� � •� a) � ,--4 ;..4 75 cn ct O O O ct V) O CU �O �b-0 ^� O O O O � [ bn C "� Ls. to ct v-- �, ct v C4 ct ct ? rte U •'-' 4 S_o Lf) '� N N N d j N p yi C�l1 aj C4 "� V) ct � O U •� ct c 1 42. ct i-. a) 1 Ct N " p U U N ct i-. O� vn ct O 4--4 O O 0 O �O O O O " ° �, 0 bA'� cu ° bD� b!� V) x U W U x x W cn W >C W . �, p v� . 4 O x E - —4 x O v >1 �, o a, >1 a, >1 a, >1 a� a a� a o a a a � o cn CU CU (1) a, a, ° a, a, a, a, O a) ° au a) 0 � a aCUi a) w � w CU E� E� �. W �. +, CU a.> a.> au a) �. w w b.0 E. E- E- E- ct Q V V Q Q E Q V) a, Q a, Q a, Q o V o V W a, Q a) Q a, Q a, Q a, Q G� O Ln �o N Ln `o Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln `c Ln _ c •V) u U _ ct ct r--� p m 0 75 ct .� a} O •� Ln ,4 ct ct . ct bA to m > - a U � . ,� � �, Ct 5.,., , 4 y G V ) x p a' v N " � v '� ' �. a O . ° O Ln .� Un CU ct 1-4 c co u V) Q V) V) � ct O ° '� �.. CL) O c "x0 � �� Q x U �°�' O O a Q V 0 N O N N U C� a Piz N N ct V x ct O ct o � C) ,, o C Q., -� o O O a cn c �mo � ct � O p Q �' z bD 'L �--� �b.A ct u ct ct 0 4-3 ct ct ^' V) ct N t j I c � ct M r� ct a �° V) ,—, •,-- O �' 0 ct • r" ct O to ct ►� 1° c� Z N ct x U ct > U N :> U c ct Vl OU O P P 00 ct U Vj 75 'O b o ' O bjO �•' �L V) U ct O 1 N • N ::5 p Ls.. • O O U �O .> [cn/� 4.1 c ct .> �cnn O O v N 'O Ln to w V) O V) V) CU � o rs b0 o ct H o ° w to ct r 4 '� o U ct a4 cu 0 V) V) V) '~ >, �, ✓, 0 a) CU CU 0 CU CU CU w U U U U Q Q Q Q t p C� > U � � CU '� O I ;..4 '� U y cd V) ct v O co O � M M Lf7 Lf7 U V ct n PC ct U vi Al CU u • 0 V1 S'.r c� U U O cu � u V, bA V) V Q U U U ct U CU .� = U C/] ct C/] u U O C/] C� a Piz N N ct V O ct C Q., -� o O a cn ct u b�A ct '� ,� ,—, •,-- O �' '� ct • r" ct O to ct ►� Cu c� Z N O x U ¢, 'O to x C4 b�-0 bjO �•' �L ® •� • N ::5 p Ls.. • O O U �O .> [cn/� 4.1 c ct .> �cnn O p Ln U a) N 'O Ln to w C4 o rs b0 o ct H bz o ° w to ct r 4 '� o U ct a4 0 0 75 14 C . ) Ln O �.., ct ct a--) O CA U t p C� > U � � CU '� O I ;..4 '� U y cd V) ct v O co O "0 U V ct O vi P-A 0 � U p '� U � �, Ct -C cn y0., N Ln O u .4 ct b b 0 u C) b.0 • O O CU > -.A to �� O O O ;z L Ln M O O o o U a o CU a o 0 0 �:5 �5 .°-O 4 0 a a a a o a a a a a p cm >1 >1 a a o a a a a a +� +� o bA o bA w o 0 0 C4 W C4 \ W W W N M M N M M ct ct 0 4-J Ct U ct U � cn ,S' 4..J 4. Q U r Un U cn o ct O cn r--, ,� $- bA ,� U u U O 75 bb • bA S•.+ cn ct ,� ct a� O �� u a� 4- J ct bz c� U �•- U O O c t �O O bjo O • U v C4 CU Qu N ct aCZ O O N N T C/] O � O Ln cu En O O U +, w • �, a) cu ct N z a) •� O . O O u O cu a a) i B" bA O a� b O �_ P N bbn ct o a, �� o ,� O ¢, Vn��C4w�:) r-q N M d'' Lr) �10 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N 4--J bA • O cu •� � O x U cu tri 1 ct u p U ,±J "O 4-J O +' O O ,o V) O N O U ct ct Z p c� N "O > '' ° p �, i.� O U p a) a) 1 ct bn •.� O U �..� �.; p p V3 O U O c .--a U 4--� 4 V) . V) 4 1 O •� N Ls. Q, O cd Ln cd O O p U O p O U O�:5 H o a 7 p o b-C > ct CU O > O O w p U 1 Ln GA '� ct`�'" b.A O `�" U ct ct �O �, 4 CU Ct p ct c� 4-J ct O O O H O O �.., � � ^O 'O ^O N = bA bD bD p b A a) p Ov b A b A b .0 W x x vOi x Ln W W . • ,••a • ,••a Lr) • .-- • .-- V) M M M M Lf) rf CU U O O 4 O 0 O O O N a ) > 0 � N O >1 >1 >1 >1 >1 >1 > >1 >1 a a b.0 b.0 b.0 r. 0 v] cn W G� O � N M M M M n ct ct ct 7 5 ct " ^ P. cam = -= � • bjO u O p'~ O O ct N G� a u. U C] v) Cl. C4 C4 Ll. C4 C4 W > T C/] O � O Ln cu En O O U +, w • �, a) cu ct N z a) •� O . O O u O cu a a) i B" bA O a� b O �_ P N bbn ct o a, �� o ,� O ¢, Vn��C4w�:) r-q N M d'' Lr) �10 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N Chapter 3: Transportation Chapter 3: Transportation Section 3.1 - Parkin Area Desi (A) Automobile Parkin Dia and Dimensions Fi 3.1-1 Standard Parkin Space and Aisle Dimensions 9.00 � 30'* PARKING 17.3" ��� 29.3' ONE-WAY AISLE 12.0' 1 4 March 22, 2011 3-1 9.01 21.0' 39.0" ONE-WAY AISLE 1860, 60'8 PARKING 1 0' 4 TWO-WAY AISLE 900 PARKING t 9.01 19.01,_1 12.0' 21 .0' PARALLEL PARKING ONE-WAYAISLE i Roanoke Count Desi Handbook 3-2 March 22, 2011 Chapter 3: Transportation Fi 3.1-2 Compact Parkin Space and Aisle Dimensions 8.01 14.6 26,6' ONE-WAY AISLE 12.0' 30'0 PARKING I 60* PARKINf 17.6' 1 35.6' ONE -WAY AISLE 18.01 1 45'* PARKING .0 ONE-WAY 1USLE 18.01 I -8.0 TWO-WAY AISLE 90' PARKING t 16.01 ON E-WAY AISLE ITO' PARALLEL PARKING I Roanoke Count Desi Handbook Chapter 3: Transportation (B) Bicycle Parking March 22, 2011 ° 3 - 3 Chart 3.1 -1 Bicycle Parking Standards Impervious Spaces Provided Bicycle Spaces Required* Extra Bicycle Spaces Provided Total Bicycle Spaces Provided Maximum Impervious Space Reduction ** (Extra Spaces / 4) 20 0 4 4 1 50 3 4 7 1 75 4 12 16 3 100 5 20 25 5 150 8 28 36 7 200 10 40 50 10 250 13 48 61 12 300 15 60 75 15 350 18 68 86 17 400 20 90 110 20 *No more than 20 bicycle spaces shall be required ** The number of impervious spaces that can be reduced is calculated by dividing the extra bicycle spaces provided by four. Impervious vehicular parking spaces reduced shall not exceed 5% of the total impervious spaces provided. Figure 3.1 -3 Bicycle Sign Examples NO M1' �px 0 (_1 4 Ito 'L E w B i cy-c le Parking Sign Wimples 5 ours M t ra i t i r-.ff ic Cont- d De r LAND BIKE L A _ Ae I Bi cycl a Access Si.g e E xan pal En Ur f Roanoke County Design Handbook 3-4 March 22, 2011 Fi 3.1-4 Bic Racks Chapter 3: Transportation I Pui ni p I e s o fBic Racks that Do Meet the Desi G ud cW in es V. 7 1—., ro , On I r 7 Fe q u i m m e r. t- F b E F E , t W-' z F i r i : - A - z C. U 1 LT � e S WI s-jildoi F&nc*Stvl*Racks ivelvo as, JUbWIj Stvlv Racks RAcks thAr pxa,�Wa no, support (bir tho Wc frimW siod do no,tal low loc king otboth wheel -Wd rj AIIIV. Exarnplesof Bic Racks that UO NOT Meet the Desi Gulild,elines Source: C i I fts. Chart 3.1-2 Bic Rack Recommended Features 1. Support the bic upri b at least two points of contact 2. Prevent the wheel of the bic from tippin over 3. Enable the frame and one or both of the wheels to be secured 4. Accommodate a U-Shaped lockin device S. Lock the frame and both wheels to the rack with a chain or cable not lon than six (6) feet Roanoke Count Desi Handbook Chapter 3: Transportation Section 3.2 - T Pavin Fi 3.2-1 Impervious Pavement Cross Section Paved Surface Ba March 22, 2011 � 3-5 rP iii li t. r I='"= ffl=fl "I I I III Ii r7 Ir - (-'Oil ...J,cte d ub- iz 1 - a C I P- k- Section 3.3 - Permeable Pavin Fi 3.3-1 Permeable Paver Cross Section , n p I c_ Cam)- hlx k- Semin bed, .u.m& ba-w F 1 7 U f OL 7 bliuck %16 Sand tea---n g bed • CmtS2 B&M IL A Roanoke Count Desi Handbook z 0 C:) u �-4 ct 10 110 M �A cW u ct CU 5 CU cu 5 CU 96 CU P= V 0 Lj 4-M 4-J r l I co C3 co LA CU ro -d e Cd qj 4-J 0 — 0 +3 1:1 ri rd cd 0 qj .5 ej A o 4-0 eu � qj Q. Lro co ro K;c . I I-A O-A = J r-I L-M 16. d -r-I CLJ S. cd Dr. .Ij 0 cd 121 F-I M Z to r. tLD g CA r.?3 L ro J. m �j CL ;=j - .P6 Op r-_-m Lrim to o 'r," • o m tj > 2 W3 6. di kA ra di 4) .J 0 P.6 � � P.6 * 0 0 4 1 o 4-0 LA tLc 0 rx aj m u tLc kA M M Q "9 ql Q FLA r m j ---I CL - r-, LON ;J L-j ILA tLt ILA e-I ? 1 0 t3f T �u tu % CU W-A 0 rN w �r j -6- C3 �.e aj Ali tx Ln bf 0 &A 4'a 0--a %-6 cu 0 z _Q tz K. . r C3 cd 4� 4-J PC C3 d.- 4-J LO cV FE r-9 C-4 m lit 44 ;-i O-A r= CO W3 cu C,3 ID cd t QL W3 �i di Ld --A : d j 0 cu 6m C-4 tLt ILA e-I ? 1 0 t3f "I t �u tu 70 0 CU W-A 0 rN w �r j -6- C3 Ian a cu aj Ali tx ro �rL bf 0 &A Sr j C3 • 0--a %-6 cu 0 0 41" ri ---I --I 0 9 . r C3 cd lu > 4-J PC C3 d.- 4-J LO cV tLt ILA e-I ? 1 0 t3f CA rmi - 0 lai r. LA rd cd tLCI CU � p 0 Im = r.-3 LA 6m w 2d cm 4-J re-, r 1 g, > 3J CL LA - rFj im I:n 1;6 v r— 1 Cq LA LIM r- r-j r-j C4 6m r CLJ co w qj Q LA U rO b > m di di cu L.2 0 Q. Q� Q� Q. Lrj m tLe CA 13J rx I C3 13J M. al r 0 C3 Lim Cj tLe r- Cj V1 d-I 1-3 Zj Ci 0 ruj di qo .a 0 Q. Q� = Q. Lo 4-J ro tLc Q �--j r." LA wl r--1 10 0 , � dj qo c r-j cd cl a W3 2 LA 60 2 M 6. D 0 CU 0 E. r.0 ro a rd CU 0 C. t4 -S= CL kA rl �u tu 70 0 J-j tLc 0 rN w t w j -6- C3 64 aj Ali tx m 0 bf 0 &A 60 qj wi r. co cu 0 0 41" tc 0 9 . r C3 cd V 49 4-J PC C3 d.- AJO FE r-9 C-4 m 44 ;-i O-A r= CO W3 cu C,3 ID cd t QL W3 �i di Ld --A : d j 0 cu 6m C-4 130 CA rmi - 0 lai r. LA rd cd tLCI CU � p 0 Im = r.-3 LA 6m w 2d cm 4-J re-, r 1 g, > 3J CL LA - rFj im I:n 1;6 v r— 1 Cq LA LIM r- r-j r-j C4 6m r CLJ co w qj Q LA U rO b > m di di cu L.2 0 Q. Q� Q� Q. Lrj m tLe CA 13J rx I C3 13J M. al r 0 C3 Lim Cj tLe r- Cj V1 d-I 1-3 Zj Ci 0 ruj di qo .a 0 Q. Q� = Q. Lo 4-J ro tLc Q �--j r." LA wl r--1 10 0 , � dj qo c r-j cd cl a W3 2 LA 60 2 M 6. D 0 CU 0 E. r.0 ro a rd CU 0 C. t4 -S= CL kA 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 di rl • , X 4-J 70 0 r 1 Cd C3, S-j 4--J C " aj Ali tx m 0 bf bf 0 m qj wi r. co o 0 rn tc ry 9 4 -1 0 qj m tu ;=j Q -J PC C3 w C3 S. LA 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 di rl • , X 4-J 70 0 r 1 Cd C3, S-j 4--J C " aj Ali tx m 0 bf bf 0 m qj wi r. co o 0 rn tc 70 �rL 9 4 -1 0 qj m tu ;=j Q -J PC C3 w C3 S. LA AmM6%i6 40- C3 5'61 • t* LA am W3 ul r U3 u CU 0 cd ;, J-4 > PL, ro 07- 0 du rl • , X 4-J Ci CU I?j ea Jj tc r 1 Cd C3, Ld 41 cl m 0 cu 0 =- r7M Ld r--w � I" R.r-1 :1 2L tc C3 =j vi 0 0- W FAIJ C3 " cd Ku un -0 rx ro roi A-0 IZ w-A cu rd 0 ;g 'M 0 ;j ; M - 61M 6-1 • r-i 16- C) r-9 IZJ ci 1-9 - W3 F-I r !59 6, a C3 qJ ; . v , LA U -0 C) > tu di di Q .1 0 C6 Q� I= Q. LQ tLr.- d 06-1 I d; F j6d i:0 W el r-1 L.0 Iti L M r, 7jj M Z cd L di r-'v Li . 0 C d CL Cd Q Q S. 06-1 49 rd J� I cd j -C o P-4 r q CA r =J �Lj ;m � 5 X tl 0 0 AM C ! J % e a qo LA LA aj cd S-1 -0 .. lrj 0 r rJ cc Ln 0. w A - 6--A . LOIL d j 1 ON :. :3 pq �4 L- L= kf3 4 V) un O C) 0 -Q cc 0 N N v ct e --, ct ct 0 +J CL) +J a� b.A ct a rz v 3 -8 March 22, 2011 Figure 3.3 - 2 Examples of Permeable Pavement Applications Chapter 3: Transportation Concrete Paver Driveway 3 _ .0010- • � i AV 444 C ~ t 'lop �Pl ,is t ic Latt Turf Paveme � - i t Roanoke County Design Handbook L r Yr�'' Parking Area Chapter 3: Transportation March 22, 2011 3 -9 Section 3.4 - Sidewalks (A) Intent: Sidewalks are encouraged in areas with potential for moderate to high pedestrian activity along public and private rights -of -way, particularly within and between the following areas: 1. High employment 2. Commercial (service) areas 3. Dense residential areas (multifamily and small -lot, single - family residential subdivisions) 4. Public facilities (schools, libraries, parks, recreational centers) (B) General standards (refer to current VDOT standardsa, as amended, for additional standards and detail) 1. Materials: a. Concrete which may be stamped and colored; or b. Solid paving units such as brick or concrete. 2. Sidewalk depth: 4 inches minimum 3. Curb Ramps: Provide at all road intersections and crosswalksb Roanoke County Design Handbook 3 -10 March 22, 2011 Chapter 3: Transportation Chart 3.4 -1 Sidewalk and Planting Strip Standards Planting Strip / Buffer Width Sidewalk With Without Width Street Street Sidewalk Trees Trees Location Adjacent to Clear Curb Width ** .� . a . CU . .� . Concentrated Business Areas or High No 10 10 to 15 10 6 6 3 5 to 6 Pedestrian Volumes No 5 6to8 5 6 6 3 5to6 Other Business Areas Yes 8 8 to 10 5 n/a n/a Residential Areas on No 5 4 6 3 Yes 8 4 n/a n/a Public (VDOT) Roads Residential Areas on No 4* 5 4 4 6 2 2 to 4 Yes 5 6 4 n/a n/a Private Roads *Sidewalks less than 5 feet in width shall have 5- foot -wide passing spaces located at reasonable intervals. ** Sidewalk clear width is the portion of sidewalk that excludes obstructions and any attached curb AASHTO Section 3.5 - Shared Use Paths (A) Intent: Two - directional shared use paths are encouraged to be constructed in locations along public roads where pedestrians, bicyclists and other non - motorized users (and including motorized wheelchair users) can utilize the path either as a recreational amenity in itself or as a means to get from one location to another. Accessibility should be a fundamental consideration in the design and development of shared use paths. (B) General Standards (refer to current VDOT and AASHTO standards, as amended, for additional standards and detail) 1. Material: Hard, all- weather pavement surface Roanoke County Design Handbook Chapter 3: Transportation March 22, 2011 3 -11 2. Wi dth : a. 10 feet minimum with a 2- foot -wide graded area adjacent to both sides of the paths b. 8 feet minimum with a 2- foot -wide graded area adjacent to both sides of the path may be permitted when one or more of the following conditions are presente: i. Bicycle traffic is expected to be low, even on peak days or during peak hours, ii. Pedestrian use of the facility is not expected to be more than occasional, iii. There will be good horizontal and vertical alignment providing safe and frequent passing opportunities, and iv. During normal maintenance activities the path will not be subjected to maintenance vehicle loading conditions that would cause pavement edge damage. 3. Location: 5 feet minimum from edge of pavement or less with a suitable physical barrier between the path and the edge of the shoulderf 4. Grade: The path should generally match the grade of the road and should not exceed 5 percent except for short distances as referenced in the chart below: Chart 3.5 -1 Shared Use Path Grades Permitted Grade (p ercent) Maximum Length 5 -6 800 7 400 8 300 9 200 10 100 11+ 50 Based on the 1999 AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities9 S. Clear zone: 3 feet wide on either side of the pathh 6. Curb Ramps: Provide at all road intersections and crosswalks Roanoke County Design Handbook 3 -12 March 22, 2011 Figure 3.5 -1- Shared Use Path Cross • - Section 3.6 - Trails Chapter 3: Transportation (A) Intent: Private trails maybe constructed in residential, commercial, industrial or other types of developments as recreational amenities or as a means to get from one location to another. Users may include pedestrians, bicyclists, equestrians, and persons in wheelchairs. These regulations are not intended for public trails which are typically located within public lands. (B) Design Considerations: Trails should be designed to be sustainable in order to protect the environment, to meet the needs of users, to require little maintenance and to minimize conflict between different user groups.] Trails should be designed with a natural shape and should consider anchors, edges, gatewaysk and incorporating loops to maximize trail interest. Well- designed trails take advantage of natural land features.' (C) General Standards 1. Hard Surface Trails a. Trail Width: 4 feet wide, minimum b. Trail Corridor Clearing Limit Recommendation: Trim vegetation and remove obstacles within two feet of either side of the trail. c. Trail Ceiling Recommendation: 8 feet high, 10 feet high if equestrian use is anticipatedm d. Road Separation: 2 foot minimum grass strip or landscaped buffer Roanoke County Design Handbook 3" CLEAR ZONE MINIMUM 10' HARD, 5" MINIMUM DISTANCE ON EACH SIDE OF PATH ALL - WEATHER PAVED FROM ADJACENT SURFACE ROADWAY Chapter 3: Transportation March 22, 2011 3 -13 Figure 3.6 -1 -Hard Surface Trail Cross Section 8'-10' PAVED SURFACE MINIA LIA 5"LANI)SCAPtNG RECOMMENDED WHEN ADJACENT TO ROADWAY 2. Natural Surface Trails a. Trail Width: 3 feet wide, minimum, unless a narrower trail width is required by a state or federal agency. b. Trail Corridor Clearing Limit Recommendation: Trim vegetation to the ground and remove obstacles within one foot of either side of the trailn. c. Trail Ceiling Recommendation: 8 feet high, 10 feet high if equestrian use is anticipated° d. Grade: The average trail grade should be 10 percent or less to be most sustainablep. The maximum sustainable trail grade is typically 15 to 20 percentq and should not be exceeded. Follow the Half Rule that a trail's grade should not exceed half the grade of the hillside or sideslope that the trail traversesr. e. Accommodating Erosion: Design rolling contour trails with gentle grades, grade reversals every 20 to 50 feet and a tread with a five percent outslope. Avoid locating trails along fall lines or within flat areas that will collect waters. f. Riparian Areas: Riparian vegetation shall be carefully considered in the planning and construction of trails in riparian areas. Wherever possible, the disturbance of existing vegetation shall be minimized and native and non - invasive species shall be planted to mitigate losses. g. Road Separation: 2 foot minimum grass strip or landscaped buffer Roanoke County Design Handbook 3 -14 March 22, 2011 Figure 3.6 -2 - Natural Surface Trail Cross Section 2. Acceptable Trail Materials Chapter 3: Transportation Chart 3.6 -1 Acceptable Trail Materials and Standards Material Hard Natural Minimum Accessible Appropriate Uses Surface Surface Thickness Asphalt X 3 inches yes Pedestrian, Bicycle Concrete X 4 inches yes Pedestrian, Bicycle Synthetic Rubber X 3 inches yes Exercise /Fitness Compacted Pedestrian, Bicycle, Aggregate: „ X 6 inches yes Equestrian 3/8" Natural Fines 21A Crushed Stone: Compacted Pedestrian, #10 Compacted X Base with 2 no Mountain Bicycle, Fines inches on Equestrian to Wood Chip X 3 inches no Pedestrian, Equestrian Compacted Soil X N/A no Pedestrian, Bicycle, Equestrian Pedestrian, Grass X N/A no Mountain Bicycle, Equestrian 4. Steps a. Steps placed closely together or spaced far apart may be utilized to climb trails with steeper grades due to varying topography. The material used to construct steps shall match or complement the trail type. For example, Roanoke County Design Handbook 3` -8' NATURAL SURFACE MINIMUM 3' LANDSCAPING RECOMMENDED '4WIEN ADJACENT TO ROADWAY Chapter 3: Transportation March 22, 2011 3 -15 large rocks would complement a gravel trail or wooden railroad ties would complement a wood chip trail. b. If placed closely together, the step rise should measure between 6 and 8 inches and the run should measure between 10 and 12 inches. Landings shall measure at least 6.S feet.t c. A handrail may be installed adjacent to the steps to assist hikers in climbing steep terrain. S. Easements a. Access easements shall be recorded with a width five feet greater than the trail width. Section 3.7- Bicycle Accommodations (A) Applicable regulations for bicycle accommodations: 1. Current VDOT standards, as amended 2. AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, as amended 3. Regional bikeway plans, as amended, available from the Roanoke Valley Alleghany Regional Commission and the Roanoke Valley Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Roanoke County Design Handbook 3 -16 March 22, 2011 Section 3.8 - Private Roads (A) Intent Chapter 3: Transportation 1. The intent of this section is to provide adequate standards for Roanoke County private roads. Such roads may be provided only in selected urban residential developments including the Cluster Subdivision Option, the Planned Residential Development District, Townhouse and Manufactured Home Park developments. Private roads may also be permitted in locations identified by the Zoning Ordinance. 2. For related topics not covered in this section, refer to other County, State or Federal regulations. (B) Definitions 1. Alley: An open way that affords a service (i.e. garbage collection, delivery, mail) means of access to an abutting property, but is not maintained by any local, state, or federal government. (Roanoke County Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance) Alleys may also contain underground utilities. 2. Driveway: A private roadway providing access for vehicles to a parking space, garage, dwelling, or other structure. (Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance) A driveway is intended to provide access to no more than two dwelling units. 3. Easement: A right expressed in recorded writing, given by the owner of land to another party of specific limited use of that land (i.e., access, pedestrian, greenway, drainage, water, sewer, public utility). (Roanoke County Subdivision Ordinance) 4. Plat, Final: The plat of a proposed subdivision of land that has been preliminarily approved and signed by the agent as a preliminary plat, subsequently recorded or to be recorded with the Clerk's Office. (Roanoke County Subdivision Ordinance) S. Private Street /Road: A vehicular way owned, operated, provided, and maintained by an individual, developer, homeowners' association, or any other entity other than a local, state, or federal government. (Roanoke County Subdivision Ordinance) A private road is intended to provide access to three or more dwelling units. 6. Right -of -Way: A legally established area or strip of land on which an irrevocable public right of passage has been or is to be recorded, and which may be occupied or intended to be occupied by a street, utility service, water main, sanitary or Roanoke County Design Handbook Chapter 3: Transportation March 22, 2011 3 -17 storm sewer main, or other similar use. (Roanoke County Subdivision Ordinance) 7. MOT: The Virginia Department of Transportation (Roanoke County Subdivision Ordinance) (C) Design 1. New private roads shall be designed to connect to Local Access Roads or Collectors and shall be designed to provide access to each residential lot. 2. Shoulder and Ditch Section Requirements. a. Intent. Shoulder and ditch sections are intended primarily for Planned Residential Developments characterized by larger residential lots (generally 1 /4 acre or greater) that may have longer driveways that allow parking for several vehicles. Only in rare instances would residents or guests park along the shoulder of a private road. b. General Parking. If shoulders will be frequently utilized for parking, each shoulder shall measure four feet in widthU and shall be constructed of either stone or bituminous pavement. Parking is not recommended along road sections with grades greater than 15 percent. c. Guest Parking. On- or off-street guest parking maybe provided but is not required on roads designed with shoulder and ditch. Chart 3.8 -1 Shoulder and Ditch Standards Projected Traffic Volume ADT ^ Travelway Width (pavement onl Roadway Width (including shoulders 0 -400 16v 20W 401 -600 18X 22Y Over 600 Refer to current VDOT standards, as amended Referenced Standards: AASHTO Very Low Rural, 15- 40MPH; AASHTO Very Low Local in Urban Areas, 2 or less du acre " To find the Average Daily Trip Generation (ADT) for a proposed land use, refer to the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Manual, as amended. 3. Curb and Gutter Section Requirements. a. Intent. Curb and gutter sections are intended for both Cluster and Planned Residential Development residential neighborhoods that are densely developed with small lot sizes (generally 1 /4 acre or less). Roanoke County Design Handbook 3 -18 March 22, 2011 Chapter 3: Transportation b. General Parking. Residential lots may have driveways spaced closely together that are shorter in length, allowing for parking of between two and four vehicles in the driveway. Parking is not recommended along road sections with grades greater than 15 percent. c. Guest Parking. One -half (1/2) parking space shall be provided for each dwelling unit for guest parking. Any fraction equaling or exceeding one- half (1/2) shall be construed as requiring one (1) full parking space. Parking spaces maybe located off - street in a marked space or on- street in compliance with Chart 3.8 -2., Curb and Gutter Standards. d. Curb and Gutter. Use CG -6, CG -7 or roll -top curb. See 5(e) Curb and Gutter Design for additional information. Chart 3.8 -2 Curb and Gutter Standards Projected Traffic Volume (ADT)Ag Pavement Widths Only No Parkin Parkin One g Side Parkin Both g Sides 0 -400 16 20 24 401 -600 18 21 24 Over 600 Refer to current VDOT standards, as amended Referenced Standards: AASHTO Very Low Rural, 15 -40MPH To find the Average Daily Trip Generation (ADT) for a proposed land use, refer to the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Manual, as amended. Roanoke County Design Handbook ■ O V ti PC CU c� i..o AA V . P M4 ` a 1= ■ p.y A �I CU P C �1 0 0 ■ M G) bA ( W 0 r r 0 L.L. Q LLJ � Z Z: r cq � O LLJ 4 � L t7; LLI w 3 c w D �O = w U H W W Q Z fn r CN14 it. Z LLJ m cn z _ cn LL- 0 =w w �' Q ;r- ry u r W �� ¢ vi I O m d Q7 r � J < M �] V1 V 1 ! � 3 14Z 0m QD #� D r u r MEMO m w M > < W a) C) 0 �.... O. O E w V) a 0 �. ( C %a- E `f' r. c� D [l W [4 _ J Lt) wL � � W M2 Nom' �� � J d m iV =E 0 r w � W L) Lj z �CK J M m W W MUD CD W W W Of < � Z: z:i Q V)< W C7 !�W Z _ Z O Ld L�7 V) ( if L LL- IL Ld in d • J m z 0< Z) r vJ ■ O V 0 �I CU Piz cu V ■ p.I cu �•r V N 00 M GU bA .PM4 P6 t� r i r l�� [i :4 ¢ T LL- -J:2 A II W - W = - e C3 V) m m LLJ C [D C) I 0 L) C:) m �IJ � 40 Im V) U � 0 OD '04 r W U Q T J T I C:�4 >� ?4 w � � T V) w W = M V) M W W < Lo C) 0 m 0 0 a_ - T r 1 _II 00 I J T r � W 0 CL - `II O � r Z � _ T fJ W J pL=Il m uj a- T C d C.] Cl J �a _ � Co W a V) o W �._ fy < *~ < Z � H < ���cno w Z 0 o o U j Z op =cn Q ca °�F0 << a C U c LL. W W W of Z w W ilf o¢waa= Z mwcn3: 0 � m � UP � N 04 V9 0 N N �E � 3 • u I 0 0 W W � L a �Of Cy D w o fr J � H V) LLI � Lei F- m !�w z w w IZ CL w � m � r C� D U C) a > a � o E t a ° L) C E CL } L Cl O V o� O a 0 cc Lu w LU d r J � O W [a G? M U) Y I (n *CV Q LLJ W J d w � UP) m m w w LL. C) < w >� ?4 w � � T V) w W = M V) M W W < Lo C) 0 m 0 0 a_ - T r 1 _II 00 I J T r � W 0 CL - `II O � r Z � _ T fJ W J pL=Il m uj a- T C d C.] Cl J �a _ � Co W a V) o W �._ fy < *~ < Z � H < ���cno w Z 0 o o U j Z op =cn Q ca °�F0 << a C U c LL. W W W of Z w W ilf o¢waa= Z mwcn3: 0 � m � UP � N 04 V9 0 N N �E � 3 • u I 0 0 W W � L a �Of Cy D w o fr J � H V) LLI � Lei F- m !�w z w w IZ CL w � m � r C� D U C) a > a � o E t a ° L) C E CL } L Cl O V o� O a 0 cc Chapter 3: Transportatio March 22, 2011 3 -21 4. Turnarounds. Z Every effort shall be made to provide through roads within a subdivision to minimize the need for dead end streets. If dead end streets must be used, turnarounds shall be required at the end of all private streets and alleys and are encouraged at the end of all shared driveways. a. Grade: Turnarounds shall have a maximum 5 percent centerline grade with a minimum cross slope of 'A inch to 1 foot.aa b. Landscaped Islands: To reduce impervious area, curbed or un- curbed landscaped islands may be permitted within 45 -foot radius or larger cul- de -sacs. The landscaped area shall have a maximum radius of 25 feet and a maximum 5- foot -wide concrete raised median strip (VDOTMS-lbb)may be located along the edge of the island. Bioretention areas may be permitted in such islands. c. Cul -de -sac Parking: To allow access for solid waste collection and other delivery vehicles, parking shall not be permitted in cul -de -sacs with landscaped islands. Parking shall not be permitted on cul -de -sacs with an edge -of- pavement or a face -of -curb radius less than 45 feet. Parking shall be permitted on cul -de -sacs with an edge -of- pavement or a face -of -curb radius of 45 feet or greater. d. Alternative Turnaround Parking: Parking shall not be permitted in T- Type or Branch -Type Turnarounds. Roanoke County Design Handbook C N ct N N m V try au V .� �I V 0 V ■ P oo CU A 0 M 00 M GU bA w C qr— �aw UlAb� Ln C) 11 X LL) 0 rn f z E DEEM 1 i i i i i i ► ■f w Max. ` LLI �"� D 2.87- b w LA � �- o a. �. z to .- Q �z OPEN w 7 % Q n Zn � Ln } Z AO CL DV (D 1 i i i i i i i � � � •_ F - p v dr u L 0 ° � Q a� dr a 4 W6 r __ JOP r�1 uj 8 • _ A LU .ro ' 0 z 0 ° 0 am 0000/ 0 0 V o� O 0 V cu 1 V .� V O V cu ,O O � V M 00 - � M cu O � z 0 do lop En z 0 4 [[ w F- LLI C � a � D z W � mad �. z ::) u o his ,Q Irm � Z 5 0 0 0 W" H 'Q O O O H 0. Q qr— N LLI CA a v E CL WAA m F- a in r > v •- i o E o [ o U W � y E T 0- to 40 Ltj Z 0 W u z 0 u r nz;l �T;* �5 w UJ p U3_ op F z°"dz En z 25 F 0 ,' LOPI q 40P ago OF mop i! o F- • oC C� LL) 1 a l b - - - -- "�° �o 1 1 �D D z W � mad �. z ::) u o his ,Q Irm � Z 5 0 0 0 W" H 'Q O O O H 0. Q qr— N LLI CA a v E CL WAA m F- a in r > v •- i o E o [ o U W � y E T 0- to 40 Ltj Z 0 W u z 0 u r nz;l �T;* �5 w O N N U ct d N M V c� t/1 cu cu V T O ■ Q CU V J Lrj W M GU bA ■ P E4 P6 0 z o� ° w N Q �, o 4 �a� z U o l:) � Z 0 0 ( 0 W" t z W F o ❑ In t- 1[ > c f CAE � p�p 1 t t f l do f f I #0 AOF r ^- R l N ❑ u A so 00001 H D 4 0 0 O a a in A LL LLA V w 4 0 LU Q O T— [ o � A a E cl } CL. a in o � a c � 3 o E } 3 a 1 U� E L CL 0 �D r � F-� iir' N _ S� _ O I V o� O a O ao aff f f En r � _ max. Cq m oo E . w Ln � r �. I W A W • f w dip Z o �. 0w 0 U o i 'Sir dpp 0 z o� ° w N Q �, o 4 �a� z U o l:) � Z 0 0 ( 0 W" t z W F o ❑ In t- 1[ > c f CAE � p�p 1 t t f l do f f I #0 AOF r ^- R l N ❑ u A so 00001 H D 4 0 0 O a a in A LL LLA V w 4 0 LU Q O T— [ o � A a E cl } CL. a in o � a c � 3 o E } 3 a 1 U� E L CL 0 �D r � F-� iir' N _ S� _ O I V o� O a O z ,o 0 Q M V V c� t/1 cu V a O c� V 00 M GU bA 0 P E4 P6 Q Tl- ..a 0 z N z 5 � L F oC it C44 o 0 W to a IL Z < Ind 0 Max. W o z NS in I R=25 �- Z woo C%4 °° i ! i n V il - � r � fir] rI I � W A-- La Wft 4 4 Fla o.. CL LLJ } our / 00 E z -- f - O � a >, 0 0 0 .3 w o c I O Of n q1 O W � E o E sip I r F z I c Z o D l CI A wQw° °��, c a� w U E % a a r v Jp/ w %0 ._ > v , y 1 v 0 f IL �- z in CN w =off �[ ❑ w ❑ Ln 0 N N N U N M W5 PIC 0 c� E� CU cu c� i•� C q M CU bA o rQI tot 1 N �... mop oC C C] N 29 11 Or v [] ° 1 000 W N > m 0 ................. OE CL 0 m a _ cam i � T ,oi z �o .oi lid'' No a3 svg Hlal IA 11M3W31' Vd b II X 0 C<6 __— Tw l AL Q N r c 0 y (D (D -o r C—+ E H �° CL N ° o a • • • • Cha pter 3: Transport S. Design Elements: March 22, 2011 II 3 -27 a. Alleys. Alleys shall be owned and maintained by the Homeowners' Association, and notes to this effect shall be indicated on the final plat. i. One -way alleycc: (A) Minimum Width: 12 feet wide paved width (B) Minimum Right -of -Way Width: 20 feet wideda ii. Two -way alley: (A) Minimum Width: 16 feet wide paved width (B) Minimum Right -of -Way Width: 24 feet wide b. Bridge and Culvert Design Criteria. Current VDOT standardsee, as amended. c. Clear Zone. Current VDOT standardsf, , as amended. d. Compaction. Current VDOT standards, as amended. e. Curb and Gutter Design. Current VDOT standards, as amended. Use CG -6, CG -7 or roll -top curb. Roanoke County Design Handbook 3 -28 March 22, 2011 Chapter 3: Transportation 6 Face of Curb Face of Curb 4 R"2" 12m I ' It - - IV 40 A ft% 00 rol !� /° ' r ° s� I v fi -- 1 60 7■ Curb Std. CG-6 Curb Std. CG- F ace or Curb Invert Lino I2" R =1.5 T_ ` RolltDp Curb Figure 3.8 -8 VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix B(1), Figure 5 - Curb and Gutter Details i. Curb and gutter may be precast of Class A4 hydraulic cement concrete or cast in place using Class A3 hydraulic cement concrete.99 ii. When used with stabilized, open - graded drainage layers, the bottom of the curb and gutter shall be constructed parallel to the slope of the sub -base courses and to the depth of the pavement but not less than the thickness shown.hh f. Drainage. The crown, or cross - slope, of the road's surface shall be 2 percent (1/4 inch to 1 foot) in tangent sections to convey run -off to the shoulders and ditches. These ditches should accommodate the design runoff in a manner that assures the safety of motorists and minimizes future maintenance, damage to adjacent properties, and adverse environmental, or aesthetic effects. Refer to current VDOT Road Design Manualii and VDOT Drainage Manual standards, as amended, for additional standards. g. Driveways». In the interest of assuring adequate, convenient, and safe access to private roads, driveway landings shall not exceed ten percent Roanoke County Design Handbook Chapter 3: Transportation March 22, 2011 3 -29 for a length of 30 feetkk, measuring from the private road edge of pavement. At all driveway entrances, standard entrance gutter (Std. CG- 9B or CG -9D) shall be used with Standard CG -6 or CG -7 curb and gutter". See the graphic below for additional detail. Figure 3.8 -9 VDOT Road Design Ma Note: I See '"u'`DOT Road and Bridge Standards, l Std; PE -1 for cut/fill details � All entrance grades shall start back of the shoulder line. I If drainage is necessary, the ditch line 1 may be moved back to provide g inches (min.) cover over pipe. Pip culvert if necessary Ditch flow line � \� 1NO 'nual, Appendix B(1), Figure 9 - Private Entrance CU Entrances shall be 12 ft wide and C v t ransition smoothly into the roadway surface. Driveway entrance pavement I shall extend to the right of way line. -- 1 when an existing street is re- developed Q 0 b l and modification of an existing driveway entrance is required, the entrance pavement shall be extended to the right ! of way line or the extent of disturbance l : ` to the existing driveway. 1. E 12 FT. Surf aced 16 Ft. Graded R =20' Min. Edge of Roadway Pavement Roadway Pavement - CU o u3 ai cam" ca cam . aj a CO 0-j. UJ < 0 h. Grade. i. To allow for fire and rescue access the maximum grade shall comply with current VDOT standards, as amendedmm at private driveway entrances and at fire hydrant locations. ii. At all other locations the maximum grade shall not exceed 17 percent unless a Design Exception is approved. iii. For locations other than at driveway entrances and at fire hydrant locations, a Design Exception request may be submitted to the Director of Community Development to increase the maximum grade for a certain length of private road only if one or more of the following circumstances are present: 1. The length of road fronts 1 /2 acre lots or larger; 2. The length of road is 150 feet or shorter; 3. The length of road has a 150 -foot tangent section; Roanoke County Design Handbook 3 -30 � March 22, 2011 Chapter 3: Transportation 4. Environmental constraints such as wetlands, FEMA floodways , jurisdictional waters or County- designated floodways are located in the immediate vicinity and will not be impacted because of the Design Exception; or S. All dwelling units at and beyond the limit of the Design Exception are sprinkled. The Director of Community Development in consultation with the Fire and Rescue Department shall make the final decision regarding the Design Exception. Additional information that may be requested to assist in the final decision could include an alternative route to the Design Exception request to show that the Design Exception route presents fewer negative impacts than the alternative route. i. Green Shoulders. Current AASHTO standards, as amended. j. Guardrail. Current VDOT standardsnn, as amended. k. Horizontal and Vertical Controls. Current AASHTO standards, as amended (see charts below). All private roads shall be designed with a normal crown section; however, private roads measuring a maximum of 100 feet long with a maximum superelevation of 8 percent and serving no more than three dwelling units may be designed without a normal crown section. Chart 3.8 -3 Design Controls for Stopping Sight Distance and for Crest Vertical Curves Design Speed (mph) Stopping Sight Distance (ft) Rate of Vertical Curvature, Ka Calculated Design 20 115 6.1 7 25 155 11.1 12 30 200 18.5 19 Rate of vertical curvature, K, is the length of curve per percent algebraic difference in intersecting grades (A). K= L/A Based on the 2004 AASHTO Green Bookoo Roanoke County Design Handbook Chapter 3: Transportation March 22, 2011 3 -31 Chart 3.8 -4 Design Controls for Sag Vertical Curves Design Speed (mph) Stopping Sight Distance (ft) Rate of Vertical Curvature, Ka- Calculated Design 20 115 16.5 17 25 155 25.5 26 30 200 36.4 37 Rate of vertical curvature, K, is the length of curve (m) per percent algebraic difference intersecting grades (A). K = L/A Based on the 2004 AASHTO Green Bookpp Chart 3.8 -5 Minimum Radii for Low -Speed Urban Streets Design Speed (mph) 20 mph 25 mph 30 mph Radius (ft) 107 198 333 Based on the 2004 AASHTO Green Bookaq 1. Intersectionsrr (Excluding Alley Intersections) i. Cross Road Grade.ss The maximum difference between the pavement cross slope and the approach road grade shall not exceed 8 percent at stop intersections or 4 percent at continuous- movement intersections. (Current VDOT Road Design Manual and Subdivision Street Design Guide as amended) A landing having a minimum length of 50 feet and a maximum vertical grade of 5 percent shall be provided at each intersection. ii. Angles. Streets should intersect at right angles; however, intersecting angles between 60 and 90 degrees are permitted. (Current VDOT Subdivision Street Design Guide, as amended) iii. Spacing. Offset intersections are not allowed. Intersections or intersecting streets on the same side or opposite side shall be spaced at a minimum of 200 feet and this distance shall be adjusted upward based on upstream and downstream intersection turning movements. (Based on current VDOT Subdivision Street Design Guide, as amended) iv. Minimum Radius. For skew intersections the radius shall not be less than 25 feet for the acute angle and 30 feet for the obtuse angle of the intersection street. (Current VDOT Subdivision Street Design Guide, as amended) v. Visibility. At intersections, a minimum clear sight triangle shall be maintained as illustrated in the Intersection Design graphic below. Roanoke County Design Handbook 3 -32 March 22, 2011 Chapter 3: Transportation It shall be the responsibility of the developer /Homeowners' Association to maintain a clear sight triangle at all times. I i 90' Desfrable i Werseatten angle CCU' skew) R-25 ft. i R -30 f t. i i "r �J ------------------------ ------------------- i Figure 3.8 -10 g . I VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix d ix B 1 ; Ulnlmum lnte rseet l on pp ��, i SpacIng - 200 feet r 1� i i R -25 f t. r r` Fig► u re 3 - Intersection Minimum Intersection Rodil and Spaci m. Lighting". The installation, maintenance and operating expenses of lighting shall be provided by and at the sole expense of the developer or Homeowners' Association. n. One -Way, One -Lane Streets. One -way streets shall meet the dimensional requirements below and shall have two access points. Horizontal and vertical curvature shall meet the requirements stated above in Section Sk, Horizontal and Vertical Controls. Parking shall not be permitted along one -way, one -lane streets. Chart 3.8 -6 One-Way, One-Lane Street Standards Shoulder and Ditch Curb and Gutter Travelway Roadway Width Projected Traffic Volume (ADT) ^ Width (including shoulders) pavement Width p avement onl Up to 600 12 16 12 Based on the 2004 AASHTO Green BookUU To find the Average Daily Trip Generation (ADT) for a proposed land use, refer to the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Manual, as amended. o. Parking. Parking is not recommended along road sections with grades greater than 1S percent. In any location where parking is prohibited, "No Parking" signs shall be installed. Off- street parking spaces are permitted Roanoke County Design Handbook Chapter 3: Transportation March 22, 2011 3 -33 in the private road right -of -way to provide overflow and guest parking. To allow access for solid waste collection and other delivery vehicles, parking shall not be permitted in cul -de -sacs with landscaped islands. p. Pavement Design. Current VDOT standards, as amended. All private roads shall be designed with a normal crown section, except as otherwise noted. q. Pedestrian Shelf. Where curb and gutter is used, a 1 /4 inch per foot (two percent) graded area, a minimum three feet in width, shall be provided behind the back of the curbvv to transition from steeper adjacent grades. The pedestrian shelf is intended for pedestrian use and may include sidewalks and other related pedestrian amenities. r. Plat Covenant Language. Add the following note to each page of the plat of subdivision: "The road serving this lot is private and its maintenance, including snow removal, is not a public responsibility. It shall not be eligible for acceptance into the state secondary system for maintenance until such time as it is constructed and otherwise complies with all requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation for the addition of subdivision streets current at the time of such request. Any costs required to cause this street to become eligible for addition into the state system shall be provided with funds other than those administered by the Virginia Department of Transportation or Roanoke County." s. Right -of -Way. Minimum 30 foot width required. See current VDOT standardsww, as amended, for additional information. t. Sight Distance to include Stopping Sight Distance, Intersection Sight Distance and Sight Distance Triangles (see AASHTO tables and VDOT graphic below). Chart 3.8 -7 Stopping Sight Distance on Grades Design Speed (mph) Stopping Sight Distance (ft) Downgrades Upgrades 3% 6% 9% 3% 6% 9% 20 116 120 126 109 107 104 25 158 165 173 147 143 140 30 205 215 227 200 184 179 Based on the 2004 AASHTO Green BookXX Roanoke County Design Handbook 3 -34 March 22, 2011 Chapter 3: Transportation Chart 3.8 -8 Design Controls for Stopping Sight Distance and for Crest and Sag Vertical Curves Initial Speed Design stopping sight Rate of vertical curvature, Ka (ft/%) (mph) distance (ft) Crest Sag 20 115 7 17 25 155 12 26 30 200 19 37 Rate of vertical curvature, K, is the length of curve per percent algebraic difference in the intersecting grades (i.e., K= L /A) Based on the 2004 AASHTO Green Bookyy Chart 3.8 -9 Design Intersection Sight Distance -Case B1- Left Turn from Sto Design Stopping Intersection Sight Distance for Speed (mph) Sight Passenger Cars Distance (ft) Calculated (ft) Design (ft) 20 115 220.5 225 25 155 275.6 280 30 j 200 330.8 1 335 Note: Intersection sight distance shown is for a stopped passenger car to turn left onto atwo -lane highway with no median and grades 3 percent or less. For other conditions, the time gap must be adjusted and required sight distance recalculated. Based on the 2004 AASHTO Green BookZZ Roanoke County Design Handbook Chapter 3: Transportation Figure 3.8 -11 VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix B(1), Figure 2 - Sigh t Distance Triangle Distance to middle of nearest through travel lane varies by roadway width Line of sight Edge of travel lane Oft C 0- OL LO ,T 9;T 0 Intersection sight distance Left Sight Distance Triangl Intersection Sight Distance Major Rdway March 22, 2011 3 -35 L 0 6 E M 0 E� o LO Nr _0 a, — r-- -04 Edge of travel lane Line of sight distance to middle of nearest through travel lane Oft varies by roadway width i 'ht Sight Distance Trian I+ u. Shared Driveways. Shared driveways shall be permitted to serve no more than two houses. Shared driveways shall be created using access easements measuring 20 feet in width. Access easements shall be shown and noted on the Final Plat. Major Rdway v. Sidewalks. Sidewalks are encouraged to be located along private roads to encourage residents and their guests to walk in a designated pedestrian area separated from automobiles. Sidewalks shall be permitted within the right -of -way or within a public access easement and shall be maintained by the Homeowners' Association. Public access easements shall be shown and noted on the Final Plat. See Section 3.4, Sidewalks, for additional requirements. w. Speed Control /Traffic Calming Design Features. Speed control design features such as speed bumps, speed humps, etc., shall not be installed Roanoke County Design Handbook 3 -36 � March 22, 2011 Chapter 3: Transportation unless approved by Roanoke County Community Development with input from the staff of County Schools, County General Services, and Fire and Rescue Departments. x. Standard Notes. Include a notation on the construction plans identifying the proposed private roads. y. Stormwater Management Facilities. Entry to privately owned and maintained stormwater management facilities and accesses shall be provided per the latest County of Roanoke Stormwater Management Design Manual. An easement shall be provided to Roanoke County for access and maintenance of a stormwater management facility. Such easements shall be noted on the plat. See Section (D)1. Drainage Easements, for additional standards. z. Traffic Control Devices and Signage. Each private road shall be identified with a street name sign at each intersection which shall be white with green lettering, per Roanoke County standards. Provide stop signs at entrance and interior intersections. Comply with the MUTCD Manual, as amended. Traffic signs and street name signs do not require sign permits. For all other signs, refer to Zoning Ordinance Section 30 -93, Signs, to determine the need for a Sign Permit. Additional regulations: i. Installation and Maintenance: The developer shall be responsible for purchasing, installing and maintaining all signs. When the private road is turned over to the Homeowners' Association it shall then be the responsibility of the Homeowners' Association to maintain all signs. ii. Enforcement: The Roanoke County Police Department is unable to enforce traffic regulations on private roads. Parking enforcement shall be the responsibility of the owner of the private road or the Homeowners' Association. iii. Maintenance of Traffic through Construction Areas: Refer to the MUTCD Manual, as amended. aa. Trip Generation /Average Daily Trips (ADT). Refer to the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation manual, as amended. bb. Vertical Clearance Height. Private roads through forested areas or under other overhead obstructions must maintain proper clearance heights above the traveled way to allow passage of emergency vehicles. Tree Roanoke County Design Handbook Chapter 3: Transportation March 22, 2011 3 -37 branches must be trimmed and maintained to obtain a minimum overhead clearance of 14 feet. (D) Easements 1. Drainage Easements: a. The width and location of drainage and stormwater pond facility easements shall comply with the Stormwater Management Ordinance and Stormwater Design Manual, as amended. b. Private drainage easements shall be platted and dedicated to the homeowners' association for maintenance and notes to this effect shall be indicated on the final plat. c. Public drainage easements shall be platted and dedicated for public use. 2. Sight Distance Easements: Width and location to be determined by VDOT for public and private road intersections. For intersections of two or more private roads, dedicated right -of -way may be needed to preserve the line -of- sight. A sight distance easement may be an alternative to dedicated right -of -way. 3. Water and Sewer Easements: Width and location to be determined by the Western Virginia Water Authority or the Town of Vinton Department of Public Works depending upon the service provider. 4. Public /Private Utility Easements: Width and location to be determined by the appropriate utility company(ies) (E) Public Services 1. School Bus Service: The private road standards generally meet Roanoke County Public Schools standards for school bus service; however, Roanoke County School Administration staff reserve the right to discontinue or relocate service on private roads if school buses cannot safely pick up children, pending advance notice to the owner of the private road, due to the following situations: a. Cars are frequently parked in No Parking zones or in other locations where parking is not permitted, prohibiting the bus from passing or turning around; b. Snow has not been plowed adequately from private roads to allow school buses to safely navigate them on more than one occasion; c. Ongoing construction creates an unsafe condition for either the children or the bus; Roanoke County Design Handbook 3 -38 March 22, 2011 Chapter 3: Transportation d. Other conditions which would create an unsafe condition for either the children or the bus; or e. The Homeowners' Association requests that the bus be removed due to noise, lighting, road damage or other unforeseen reasons. 2. Solid Waste: To receive public solid waste collection, a Private Road Waiver shall be completed and signed prior to site plan /subdivision plan approval. If a Private Road Waiver is not completed, the homeowners and /or homeowners' association has the responsibility for addressing the collection of solid waste. 3. Fire and Rescue Service: A representative of the Fire and Rescue Department shall review the design and location of all proposed private streets, and shall advise the applicant whether or not the proposed private streets meet the standards for emergency services. (F) Process 1. Plan Submittal Requirements: Refer to the Roanoke County Land Development Procedures, as amended. 2. Erosion and Sediment Control: All land disturbing activities shall comply with the Roanoke County Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance, as amended. 3. Inspections: A third -party inspector shall inspect private roads following the requirements below: a. Developer must contract with a licensed inspection firm certified to perform inspections not related to or affiliated with the developer or contractor; b. Inspection procedures, testing methodology, and frequency of inspections are completed in accordance with VDOT Materials Division's Manual of Instructions and the Virginia Department of Transportation Road and Bridge Specifications. Inspections include but are not limited to: i. Completion of subgrade, prior to the placement of any ballast material; ii. Completion of ballast, prior to the placement of any top course of material; and iii. Completion of installation of road signs, installation of any appurtenant structures, and reseeding of disturbed area and slopes. Roanoke County Design Handbook Chapter 3: Tran March 22, 2011 J 3 -39 4. Final Report and As -Built Drawings: At the completion of the road construction a report including two copies of As -Built drawings shall be submitted to Roanoke County Community Development by the developer. Roanoke County shall provide one copy of the As -Built drawings to the Roanoke County Fire Marshal. a. Final Report: The Final Report shall include all material receipts, dates of inspection, work performed, changes or repairs ordered, inspection steps completed, certification of the results of inspections referenced in (F)3b, above, and confirmation that the streets were built to the approved plans, specifications and pavement design. The Final Report shall be signed and stamped by a Virginia licensed Professional Engineer. b. As -built drawings: Requirements for As -Built drawings are as follows: i. Changes to water, sewer, storm sewer, road grade and alignments. ii. Drainage improvements as required by the Roanoke County Stormwater Management Ordinance and the Stormwater Design Manual, as amended. iii. Public water and public sewer improvements per the Town of Vinton, if applicable. iv. Private water and private sewer improvements per the Virginia Department of Health. V. If requested, slope verification for road sections designed with grades of 15 percent or greater. vi. If requested, a centerline as -built or right -of -way staking for confirmation of the road location. S. Turnover to Homeowners' Association: To ensure that the Homeowners' Association does not receive substandard private roads, include the following notation on the plans: "Immediately prior to the turnover of the private roads to the Homeowners' Association, Roanoke County shall inspect the private roads and any defects shall be repaired by the responsible party before the turnover occurs." 6. Maintenance: A Homeowners' Association is required to be established to be responsible for all private roads, to include maintenance and upkeep of the private roads. The HOA shall also enforce parking restrictions.aaa Roanoke County Design Handbook 3 -40 March 22, 2011 (Page intentionally blank) Chapter 3: Transportation Roanoke County Design Handbook Appendices Appendix A: Board of Supervisors Ordinances Figure A -1 Board of Supervisors Ordinance 052609 -23 March 22, 2011 A -1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINSTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 26 ORDINANCE 052609 -23 AUTHORIZING THE DEVELOPMENT AND ADOPTION OF A DESIGN HANDBOOK TO ASSIST IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF VARIOUS FEATURES FOR CHAPTER 30 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE (ZONING ORDINANCE) WHEREAS, the public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice requires the amendment to Chapter 30 of the Roanoke County Code (Zoning Ordinance) by the adoption of a Design Handbook; and, WHEREAS, this Design Handbook provides graphic illustrations and diagrams of various elements and features of the Zoning Ordinance, including site design, landscaping, screening and buffering, transportation, parking, and other features; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this ordinance on April 7, 2009; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors held a first reading on this ordinance on May 12, 2009, and a second reading and public hearing on May 26, 2009. BE IT ORDAINED By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That there is hereby established a Design Handbook for the County of Roanoke Zoning Ordinance. 2. That the County of Roanoke will utilize the policy, criteria and information including specifications and standards of the County of Roanoke Design Handbook for the proper implementation of the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. This document shall include illustrations and diagrams of acceptable elements and features, including the specific design criteria for various amenities, improvements and features. 1 Roanoke County Design Handbook A -2 March 22, 2011 Appendices I That the County of Roanoke Design Handbook may be updated and revised from time to time, based on improvements in design, landscaping, engineering, science, monitoring and local maintenance experience. The Planning Commission may recommend and the Board of Supervisors shall authorize and approve any updates, supplements, or modifications to the County of Roanoke Design Handbook by Resolution. 4. That the elements, amenities, improvements and features that are designed and constructed in accordance with these design criteria will be presumed to meet the minimum zoning ordinance performance standards. 5. That this ordinance shall be in effect from and after the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Moore to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Church, Flora, McNamara, Altizer NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Q -.,k A _-n Becky R. Me (00'r Deputy Clerk to the Board c: Circuit Court Robert P. Doherty, Jr., Judge James R. Swanson, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Bonnie Hager, Judicial Secretary Norce Lowe, Secretary Juvenile Domestic Relations District Court Doris J. Johnson, Clerk (for distribution) Roanoke County Design Handbook Appendices March 22, 2011 A-3 General District Court Vincent A. Lilley, Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk (for distribution) Gerald Holt, Sheriff Kevin Hutchins, Treasurer Nancy Horn, Commissioner of Revenue Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Randy Leach, Commonwealth Attorney Chief Magistrate Raymond Leven Diana Rosapepe, Director of Library Services Ray Lavinder, Police Chief Richard Burch, Chief of Fire & Rescue Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Law Library, Singleton Osterhoudt Roanoke County Code Book B. Clayton Goodman, III, County Administrator John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Dan O'Donnell, Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development Tarek Moneir, Deputy Director of Development Services Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning Rebecca Owens, Director of Finance David Davis, Court Services Elaine Carver, Chief Information Officer Bill Greeves, Director of Information Technology Anne Marie Green, Director of General Services Pete Haislip, Director of Parks, Recreation & Tourism William E. Driver Director of Real Estate Valuation Brent Robertson, Director of Management & Budget Roanoke County Design Handbook A -4 March 22, 2011 (Page intentionally blank) Appendices Roanoke County Design Handbook Appendices March 22, 2011 B -1 Appendix B: Sidewalk, Shared Use Path, Trail and Private Road Standards References Figure B -1 Sidewalk, Shared Use Path, Trail and Private Road Standards References a VDOT Road Design Manual, p. B(1) -31 b VDOT Road Design Manual, p. B(1) -27 AASHTO Guide for the Planning, Design, and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities, p. 71 d VDOT Road Design Manual, p. B(1) -33; AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities (1999) p. 35 e VDOT Road Design Manual, p. B(1) -33 f VDOT Road Design Manual, p. B(1) -33 g VDOT Road Design Manual, p. B(1) -35; AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities (1999) p. 39 h VDOT Road Design Manual, p. B(1) -34 VDOT Road Design Manual, p. B(1) -27 ' Trail Solutions IMBA's Guide to Building Sweet Singletrack, p. 40 k Natural Surface Trails by Design Physical and Human Design Essentials of Sustainable, Enjoyable Trails, p. 13 -20 1 USDA Trail Construction and Maintenance Notebook, p. 24 M Trail Solutions IMBA's Guide to Building Sweet Singletrack, p. 137 n USDA Trail Construction and Maintenance Notebook, p. 44 ° Trail Solutions IMBA's Guide to Building Sweet Singletrack, p. 137 P Trail Solutions IMBA's Guide to Building Sweet Singletrack, p. 64 a Trail Solutions IMBA's Guide to Building Sweet Singletrack, p. 66 r Trail Solutions IMBA's Guide to Building Sweet Singletrack, p. 63 S Trail Solutions IMBA's Guide to Building Sweet Singletrack, p. 56 -69 t USDA Trail Construction and Maintenance Notebook, P. 119 U VDOT Road Design Manual, p. A -57 AASHTO Green Book, p. 384 (added 2 feet) W AASHTO Design of Very Low - Volume Roads, p. 18 (added 2 feet) X AASHTO Green Book, p. 384 Y AASHTO Green Book, p. 384 (added 2 feet) Z Cul -de -sac dimensions per VDOT Road Design Manual, p. B(1) -24, B(1) -25 as City of Manassas (VA) Road Standards and Brian Blevins at VDOT; based on previous VDOT Standards bb VDOT Road and Bridge Standards, 2001, p. 202.02 cc VDOT Road Design Manual p. A -16 dd AASHTO Green Book, p. 396 ee VDOT Road Design Manual, p. B(1) -37 ff VDOT Road Design Manual, p. B(1) -41 gg VDOT Road Design Manual, p. B(1) -26 hh VDOT Road Design Manual, p. B(1) -26 VDOT Road Design Manual, p. B(1) -38 " VDOT Road Design Manual, p. B(1) -30 kk 30 foot length per Roanoke County Engineer 11 VDOT Road Design Manual, p. B(1) -28 MM VDOT Road Design Manual, p. B(1)7, B(1)8 nn VDOT Road Design Manual, p. B(1) -43 °O AASHTO Green Book, p. 272 Pp AASHTO Green Book, p. 277 as AASHTO Green Book, p. 151 rr VDOT Road Design Manual, p. B(1) -21 and 22 SS VDOT Road Design Manual, p. C -4 and G -35 tt VDOT Road Design Manual, p. B(1) -53 Roanoke County Design Handbook B -2 March 22, 2011 Appendices uu AASHTO Green Book, p. 396 VV VDOT Road Design Manual, p. B(1) -27 WW VDOT Road Design Manual, p. B(1)40 XX AASHTO Green Book, p. 115 YY AASHTO Green Book, p. 381 ZZ AASHTO Green Book, p. 661; VDOT Road Design Manual, p. B(1) -7 and C -31 aaa City of Corona (CA) Public Works Department Private Street Standards Roanoke County Design Handbook AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 22, 2011 ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGN HANDBOOK TO INCORPORATE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR PRIVATE ROADS, SIDEWALKS, SHARED USE PATHS, TRAILS AND BICYCLE ACCOMODATIONS WHEREAS, on May 26, 2009, the Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance 052609 -23 which authorized the development and adoption of a Design Handbook to assist in the implementation of various features of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, on January 4, 2011, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on various amendments to the Design Handbook and on January 18, 2011, recommended said amendments to the Board of Supervisors for adoption; and WHEREAS, on February 22, 2011, the Board of Supervisors held a work session on said amendments; and WHEREAS, the amendments to the Design Handbook include private road standards, standards for sidewalks, shared use paths, private trails and bicycle accommodations, as well as formatting changes; and WHEREAS, public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice are valid public purposes for such recommendations by the Planning Commission and action by the Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 8, 2011, and the second reading and public hearing was held on March 22, 2011. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County as follows: Page 1 of 2 1. That the Design Handbook is hereby amended and revised to include private road standards, standards for sidewalks, share use paths, private trails and bicycle accommodations as well as formatting changes. 2. That the revised Roanoke County Design Handbook is attached and incorporated into this ordinance by reference and is effective from and after the date of this resolution. Page 2 of 2 ACTION IIIO. ITEM NUMBER 0-1 &fl- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: March 22, 2011 Public Hearings for citizen comment on the following items: (a) Real Estate, personal property and machinery and tools tax rates (b) General comment on the upcoming annual budget for fiscal year 2011 -2012 W. Brent Robertson Director of Management and Budget COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As requested by the Board of Supervisors, staff advertised - the proposed real estate, personal property, and machinery and tools tax rates for calendar year 2011 as follows: a. Real estate tax at a rate of not more than $1.09 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation b. Personal property tax at a rate of not more than $3.50 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation c. Machinery and tools tax at a rate of not more than $3.00 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation Consistent with past practices, the Board has expressed a desire to hold a public hearing to elicit "general" comment on the upcoming annual budget development process. This hearing gives citizens the opportunity to express their priorities and concerns for the Board to consider during formulation of the upcoming budget. Page 1 of 2 The public hearings scheduled for today are for receiving written and oral comment on these two topics. The public hearing on proposed tax rates was advertised on March 8 and March 18, 2011, and the General Comment for the fiscal year 2011 -2012 Budget was advertised on March 18 2011, thereby satisfying state code requirements for public notice. Page 2 of 2 ACTION No. ITEM NUMBER 0-2 AT A REGULAR MEETING of THE BOARD of SUPERVISORS of ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 22, 2011 AGENDA ITEM: Request to adopt the following tax rates for calendar year 2011: (a) Real estate tax rate of $1.09 per $100 assessed valuation (b) Personal property tax rate of $3.50 per $100 assessed valuation (c) Machinery and tools tax rate of $3.00 per $100 assessed valuation SUBMITTED BY: W. Brent Robertson Director of Management and Budget APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator ?SJ:Z-- COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY of INFORMATION: At the direction of the Board of Supervisors, the proposed tax rates for the twelve month period beginning January 1, 2011 and ending December 31, 2011, were advertised on March 8 and March 15, 2011, as follows: a. Real estate tax at a rate of not more than $1.09 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation b. Personal property tax at a rate of not more than $3.50 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation c. Machinery and tools tax at a rate of not more than $3.00 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation Pagel of 2 A public hearing for citizen comment on the above advertised tax rates was held on March 22, 2011. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The proposed budget for fiscal year 2011 -2012 is predicated on the advertised real estate, personal property, and machinery and tools tax rates; therefore, staff recommends that the aforementioned tax rates be established as advertised. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING of THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS of ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 22, 2011 ORDER SETTING THE TAX RATE ON REAL ESTATE SITUATE IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 2011 BE IT ORDERED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the levy for the twelve -month period beginning January 1, 2011, and ending December 31, 2011, be, and hereby is, set for a tax rate of $1.09 per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation on all taxable real estate and mobile homes classified by Sections 55.1 -3200, 58.1 -3201, 58.1- 3506.A.8, and 58.1 - 3505.13 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, situate in Roanoke County. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 22, 2611 ORDER SETTING THE TAX LEVY ON PERSONAL PROPERTY SITUATE IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 2011 BE IT ORDERED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the levy for the twelve -month period beginning January 1, 2011, and ending December 31, 2011, be, and hereby is, set fora tax rate of $3.50 per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation on all taxable, tangible personal property, excluding that class of personal property generally designated as machinery and tools as set forth in Section 58.1 -3507 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and excluding all those classes of household goods and personal effects as are defined in Sections 58.1 -3504 and 58.1 -3505 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, but including the property separately classified by Sections 58.1 -3506, 58.1 -3501, 58.1 -3502 58.1 -3506 in the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, of public service corporations based upon - the assessed value thereof fixed by the State Corporation Commission and duly certified. 2. That there be, and hereby is, established as a separate class of personal property in Roanoke County those items of personal property set forth in Section 58.1- 3566 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and adopted by Ordinance No. 121592- 11, and generally designated as Motor Vehicles for Disabled Veterans. 3. That the levy for the twelve -month period beginning January 1, 2011, and ending December 31, 2011, be, and hereby is, set at fifty (50 %) _percent of the tax rate established in paragraph 1 for the taxable, tangible personal property as herein established as a separate classification for tax purposes and as more fully defined by Section 58.1- Page 1 of 2 3505 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and generally designated as Motor Vehicles for Disabled Veterans. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 22, 2011 ORDER SETTING THE TAX LEVY ON A CLASSIFICATION OF PERSONAL PROPERTY - MACHINERY AND TOOLS - SITUATE IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 2011 BE IT ORDERED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That there be, and hereby is, established as a separate Glass of personal property in Roanoke County those items of personal property set forth in Section 58.1- 3507 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and generally designated as machinery and tools. 2. That the levy for the twelve -month period beginning January 1, 2011, and ending December 31, 2011, be, and hereby is, set for a tax rate of $3.00 per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation on all taxable, tangible personal property as herein established as a separate classification for tax purposes and as more fully defined by Section 58.1 -3507 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and generally designated as machinery and tools.