The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About5/26/1987 - Adopted Board Recordslk. A-52687-1 ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUBJECT: Request to locate the State Forensic Science Laboratory behind Southview School. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: 1� SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 14 lei�1P cid The State Department of General Services has outgrown its present Forensic Science Laboratory and needs to expand. They have expressed an interest in locating the facility on property owned by the County behind Southview School. This is part of the property being transferred to the County by the School Board with Southview School. The laboratory would be a multi -functional facility that could perform not only forensic science work, but also environmental work such as safe drinking water, State Water Control support, and microbiological testing. This would be an ideal location for such a facility from both the State and the the County's perspective. The close access to Interstate 81 and central location in the Roanoke Valley would be assets, particularly because of the many localities that use this regional facility. There is also adequate parking available for the counties, cities and towns throughout southwestern Virginia who will use the lab. The close proximity of the forensic laboratory to the Roanoke County Public Safety Building would be advantageous to the County also. Presently there are soccer fields operated by the Parks and Recreation Department located on the property the State is interested in. Any negotiations concerning donation of this property to the State would include the continued use of the property for recreational purposes until construction by the State begins. This would allow sufficient time to relocate these soccer fields. Also included would be a provision that the land would revert to the County if it was not used for a laboratory facility within five years. FISCAL IMPACT: f1',; None at the present time. This action would only authorize preliminary negotiations with the State. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends donating 1.5 to 2.0 acres of land located directly behind Southview School to the Commonwealth of Virginia for the purpose of relocating a State Forensic Science Laboratory. If the laboratory is not begun within five years, the property will revert to the County. Elmer C. 'Hodge County Administrator ACTION Approved ( Motion by: AHB/BLJ to proceed with the Denied ( ) donation of the property to State Brittle Received ( ) of Virginia for a forensic lab. Garrett Referred Johnson To McGraw Nickens cc: File Sheriff's Department Real Estate Assessor VOTE No Yes X x X_ X Abs W. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 26, 1987 RESOLUTION 52687-2 OF SUPPORT FOR PILOT RECYCLING PROJECT WITH CLEAN VALLEY COUNCIL WHEREAS, providing adequate solid waste disposal has become a critical problem in the Roanoke Valley; and WHEREAS, the capability of Roanoke County to provide for solid waste management affects the quality of life of County resi- dents and the appeal of Roanoke County to tourists and new indus- try; and WHEREAS, there is a growing awareness that landfills are difficult and expensive to site, operate, close, and replace and, further, that landfills present other hazards, including poten- tial liability to the local governments in the event of ground water contamination, property damage, or harmful public health consequences; and WHEREAS, the General Assembly has recognized .the need for, and the public has demonstrated interest in, identifying and pro- moting safe and efficient solid waste management strategies that will reduce dependence on landfills; and WHEREAS, in other states, waste volume reduction through recycling, source reduction, resource recovery and other methods have proven to be an important element of effective comprehensive waste management strategies by extending the life of existing landfills and reducing the need of future landfill capacity; and WHEREAS, the Clean Valley Council and its Valley Recycling Project Committee have developed a pilot project to be conducted in Roanoke County involving the curbside collection of recycla- bles, including public education activities, to help assess the relative costs and benefits of a recycling program and the will- ingness of Virginia's citizens to participate; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Environmental Endowment has pledged its support and given its "Vote of Confidence" for this project in Roanoke County as offering curbside recycling as a part of the waste management program which will provide additional informa- tion on waste management to other localities throughout Virginia; and WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke desires to express by this resolution its conceptual support, for the pilot project; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that Roanoke County confirms its support for the pilot project of the Clean Valley Council and its Valley Recycling Project Committee and offers its operational support in the imple- mentation of the one-year pilot project by providing the cost of service by the Roanoke County Refuse Collection, with the under- standing that the pilot project shall be so designed that the County may reasonably anticipate and project that the cost of collection service will be offset during the course of the pilot project through savings from avoidance of landfill use fees and sale of recyclable materials collected through the project and other financial resources made available by the Clean Valley Council. On motion of Supervisor Brittle, seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: None A COPY - TESTE -W Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5/27/87 CC: File Clean Valley Council Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,VA. HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUES., MAY 26, 1987 RESOLUTION N0. 52687-3 Be It resolved by the Board of Supervisors of the County if Roanoke, Virginia, that the following appopriations are hereby made from the respective funds for the period ending June 30, 1988, for the functions and purposes indicated: EXPENDITURES: GENERAL FUND BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CO ADMINISTRATOR ADMINISTRATION COUNTY BOARD SERVICES INFORMATION & REFERRAL PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION EMPLOYEE RELATIONS TRAINING COUNTY ATTORNEY ELECTIONS REGISTRATION ELECTIONS TREASURER COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY OPERATIONS VICTIM/WITNESS PROGRAM COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE ADMINISTRATION REAL ESTATE PERSONAL PROPERTY BUSINESS LICENSE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT PUBLIC RECORDS MICROFILM POLICING & INVESTIGATING ADMINISTRATION CIVIL DIVISION UNIFORM DIVISION DETECTIVE DIVISION SERVICES DIVISION TRANSPORTAION SAFETY COMMISSION CARE/CONFINEMENT OF PRISONERS CIRCUIT COURT GENERAL DISTRICT COURT MAGISTRATE \ J & D RELATIONS COURT PROBATION PERSONNEL OPERATING CAPITAL TRANSFERS TOTAL ------------------------------------------------------------ 86,660 60,335 250 122,643 14,100 600 18,030 13,185 140,407 29,472 25,914 1,775 125,898 32;620 82,260 29,788 44,326 15,275 235,921 150,524 259,147 16,400 2,500 7,500 77,100 1,575 62,671 12,529 134,331 70,658 65,250 14,247 287,936 85,031 746 37,950 35,369 421 140,589 38,700 536,131 531150 1,217,895 235,788 186,060 677,131 93,629 2,459 565,211 88,025 960 1,493,529 319,429 6,425 93,214 150 24,910 730 239 6,516 39,175 (32,095) 43,997 147,245 137,343 31,215 169,879 25,914 1,775 126,423 112,048 59,601 430,442 275,547 10,000 78,675 75,200 204,989 79,497 373,713 73,740 179,289 589,281 1,639,743 773,219 653,236 960 1,812,958 99,639 25,060 969 6,516 39,175 PERSONNEL OPERATING CAPITAL TRANSFERS TOTAL ------------------------------------------------------------ EXPENDITURES: ASST CO ADMIN MGT SVCS 61,819 18,813 COUNTY ASSESSOR ADMINISTRATION 177,670 36,812 REASSESSMENT 298,412 44,082 BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 10,913 FINANCE CENTRAL ACCOUNTING 196,265 92,039 PAYROLL 48,564 14,320 MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET 68,039 11,955 PROCUREMENT SERVICES 161,785 39,536 FIRE ADMINISTRATION 63,192 37,575 FIRE SUPPRESSION 710,047 244,080 FIRE PREVENTION 80,523 51000 TRAINING 28,725 36,410 TECHNICAL SERVICES 53,005 104,650 PLANNING AND RESEARCH 31,504 2,455 RESCUE SQUAD OPERATIONS 143,538 EMS SERVICES 179,727 8,525 EMERGENCY SERVICES PLANNING & OPERATIONS 21,487 3,320 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 51500 ANIMAL CONTROL 97,868 43,355 ASST CO ADMIN PUBLIC FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 97,404 27,745 ROADWAY PROJECT MANAGEMENT STREET LIGHTING 101,566 REFUSE COLLECTION OPERATIONS 856,264 430,454 SESQUICENTENNIAL 30,148 75,000 ENGINEERING ENGINEERING 189,322 20,985 DRAFTING & RECORDS 70,820 8,064 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION 99,968 11,154 ROADWAY 39,896 4,895 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MANAGEMENT 123,822 12,439 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 403,872 493,808 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 340,190 87,845 LEAF COLLECTION 40,000 PARKS & RECREATION COMMUNITY EDUCATION 53,599 300 LEISURE ACTIVITIES 85,135 500 OUTDOOR ADVENTURE 24,733 11906 SENIOR CITIZENS 66,868 2,250 SPECIAL EVENTS 52,241 2,350 THERAPEUTICS 95,973 13,114 ADULT ATHLETICS 54,727 3,301 YOUTH ATHLETICS 146,768 10,000 ADMINISTRATION 191,283 226,272 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 4,551 31,200 277 370 218,500 13,600 11,395 1,206 59,260 275 200 3,900 (17,141) 90,000 (88,280) 5,700 (36,052) 7,800 (52,444) 18,325 80,632 219,033 373,694 10,913 288,304 63,161 80,364 201,321 100,767 1,172,627 99,123 76,530 158,861 33,959 202,798 188,527 25,007 9,400 141,223 108,008 101,566 1,376,718 105,148 122,027 48,532 66,578 44,791 136,261 897,680 428,035 40,000 53,899 85,635 26,641 69,118 54,591 109,087 58,028 156,768 435,880 0 EXPENDITURES: PUBLIC HEALTH SOCIAL SEVICES ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC ASSISSTANCE INSTITUTIONAL CARE SOCIAL SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS HUNAN RESOURCE COMMITTEE ASST CO ADMIN DEVELOPMENT PLANNING & ZONING ADMIN 6c COMMUNITY SERVICES LAND USE 6 ZONING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ZONING ORDINANCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PERMITS DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COORDINATOR PLANNING COMMISSION CONSTRUCTION BUILDING SERVICES ADMINISTRATION INSPECTIONS PARK DEVELOPMENT LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH 6 CIRCULATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE EXTENSION & CONTINUING EDUCATION EMPLOYEE BENEFITS INSURANCE DRAINAGE PROGRAM MISCELLANEOUS TRANS TO DEBT SEVICE-GENERAL TRANS TO DEBT SEVICE-SCHOOL TRANSFER TO CAPITAL TRANSFER TO SCHOOLS TRANSFER TO YOUTH HAVEN II TRANSFER TO INTERNAL SERVICE TRANSFER TO UTILITY CAPITAL FUND CONTINGENT BALANCE DEBT FUND GENERAL FUND OBLIGATIONS SCHOOL FUND OBLIGATIONS REVENUE SHARING FUND rLAzon" urt"lldG CAPITAL TRANSFERS TOTAL ----------------- --- ------ ------------ ------------ 1,459,796 82,515 83,233 89,696 32,394 8,900 30,878 59,082 41,998 15,560 36,385 135,142 45,948 97,336 605,858 81,623 664,349 387,016 254,945 816,406 48,000 94,984 20,000 25,042 18,436 3,600 2,500 30,000 61,375 2,085 1,400 2,700 7,550 21,203 3,332 35,892 260,542 71,200 5,170 808,380 540,675 3,203,874 1,027,244 YOUTH HAVEN II FUND 218,905 60,690 387,016 13,804 1,728,545 826,406 48,000 94,984 20,000 107,557 101,669 93,296 34,894 38,900 92,253 61,167 43,398 18,260 43,935 156,345 49,280 133,228 4,135 870,535 71,200 81500 95,293 664,349 808,380 0 540,675 2,777,160 2,777,160 938,665 938,665 290,110 290,110 25,466,000 25,466,000 72,239 72,239 246,321 246,321 40,000 40,000 13,942 13,942 ------------ 53,258,528 ------------ 3,203,874 1,027,244 150,000 150,000 299,595 PERSONNEL ------------ OPERATING CAPITAL TRANSFERS TOTAL EXPENDITURES: ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ INTERNAL SERVICE FUND DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION 91,878 9,470 1,688 103,036 OPERATIONS 91,264 103,546 12,500 12,116 219,426 DEVELOPMENT 219,421 7,850 540 227,811 VEHICLE POOL 17,350 10,500 27,850 COMMUNICATIONS 182,165 87,636 43,554 313,355 CAPITAL FUND 290,110 290,110 UTILITY CAPITAL FUND 40,000 40,000 UTILITY FUND UTILITY BILLING COLLECTIONS 85,305 90,511 6,625 182,441 METER READING 49,693 9,510 91500 68,703 UTILITY MAINT & OPERATIONS ADMINISTRATION 141,789 39,285 7,500 188,574 VATER OPERATIONS 272,212 1,438,761 1,710,973 VATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 245,784 291,716 102,155 639,655 SEVER OPERATIONS 100,061 960,326 1,060,387 SEVER MAINTENANCE 194,257 129,692 130,000 453,949 SSE/R 165,835 315,120 70,250 551,205 NON-DEPARTMENTAL-VATER 1,088,527 113,006 1,201,533 NON -DEPARTMENTAL -SEVER 834,082 113,006 947,088 FET CLASSES RECREATION FUND COMMUNITY EDUCATION 32,554 7,000 1,000 40,554 LEISURE ACTIVITIES 24,537 17,543 4,000 46,080 OUTDOOR ADVENTURE 964 17,387 1,000 19,351 SENIOR CITIZENS 6,429 16,727 2,000 27,156 SPECIAL EVENTS 1,072 6,600 1,400 9,072 THERAPEUTICS 3,215 3,285 1,000 7,500 ADULT ATHLETICS 27,227 13,445 11000 41,672 YOUTH ATHLETICS 1,060 1,060 ADMINISTRATION 2,411 4,689 400 7,500 GARAGE FUND 238,000 SCHOOL OPERATING FUND 53,684,319 SCHOOL BUS FUND 150,000 SCHOOL CAFETERIA FUND 2,731,000 SCHOOL FEDERAL PROGRAMS FUND 1,041,156 REGIONAL SPECIAL EDUCATION FUND 648,680 SCHOOL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 1,941,000 SCHOOL LITERARY LOAN FUND 4,348,060 SCHOOL TEXTBOOK FUND 411,003 ------------ 131,558,500 That the County Administrator may authorize the transfer of any unencumbered balance or portion thereof from one classification of expenditure to another within the same department or agency. That the County Administrator may transfer up to 810,000 from the unencumbered balance of the appropriation of one department or agency to another department or agency, including the contigency account encompassed in the Non -Departmental appropriation. That all funded outstanding encumbrances, both operating and capital, at June 30,1987 are reappropriated to the 1987-88 fiscal year to the same department and account for which they are encumbered in the previous year. That appropriations designated for capital projects will not lapse at the end of the fiscal year but shall remain appropriated until the completion of the project or until the Board of Supervisors, by appropriate resolution, changes or eliminates the appropriation. Upon completion of a capital project, staff is authorized to close out the project and transfer to the funding source any remaining balances. This section applies to appropriations for Capital Projects at June 30,1987 and appropriations in the 1987-88 budget. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, Johnson NAYS: Supervisors McGraw, Nickens ABSENT: None Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk 5/27/87 CC: File Reta Busher, Director of the Budget Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Tim Gubala, Assistant County Administrator REVENUES: GENERAL FUND 53,258,528 DEBT FUND 4,231,118 REVENUE SHARING FUND 150,000 YOUTH HAVEN II FUND 2991595 INTERNAL SERVICE FUND 891,478 CAPITAL FUND UTILITY FUND 290,110 FEE CLASSES - RECREATION FUND 7,044,508 GARAGE FUND 199,945 SCHOOL OPERATING FUND 238,000 SCHOOL BUS FUND 53,684,319 SCHOOL CAFETERIA FUND 1501000 SCHOOL FEDERAL PROGRAMS FUND 2,731,000 REGIONAL SPECIAL EDUCATION FUND 1,041,156 648,680' SCHOOL CAPITAL INPROVEwTS FUND SCHOOL LITERARY LOAN FUND 1,941,000 SCHOOL TEXTBOOK FUND 4,348,060 411,003 ------------ 131,558,500 Be it further resolved: That the County Administrator may authorize the transfer of any unencumbered balance or portion thereof from one classification of expenditure to another within the same department or agency. That the County Administrator may transfer up to 810,000 from the unencumbered balance of the appropriation of one department or agency to another department or agency, including the contigency account encompassed in the Non -Departmental appropriation. That all funded outstanding encumbrances, both operating and capital, at June 30,1987 are reappropriated to the 1987-88 fiscal year to the same department and account for which they are encumbered in the previous year. That appropriations designated for capital projects will not lapse at the end of the fiscal year but shall remain appropriated until the completion of the project or until the Board of Supervisors, by appropriate resolution, changes or eliminates the appropriation. Upon completion of a capital project, staff is authorized to close out the project and transfer to the funding source any remaining balances. This section applies to appropriations for Capital Projects at June 30,1987 and appropriations in the 1987-88 budget. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, Johnson NAYS: Supervisors McGraw, Nickens ABSENT: None Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk 5/27/87 CC: File Reta Busher, Director of the Budget Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Tim Gubala, Assistant County Administrator 4 A-52687-0 ITEM NUMBER �— S AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER. MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUBJECT: Approval of Classification Plan for FY 1987-88. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: f, � �, Y, - - ,, j�c Qi2� -0 Qa - 7 eg '14 �"` SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Classification Plan for County employees for fiscal year 1987-88 is submitted for your approval. The Classification Plan consists of classified and unclassified positions incorporated in the County budget approved for fiscal year 1987-88. The salaries of members of the Board of Supervisors are determined by ordinance of the Board. The salaries of the County Administrator, County Attorney, along with any salary supplements approved for constitutional officers, are also determined by the Board. The salaries for other County employees, both classified and unclassified, are determined by the County Administrator within the limits of the adopted Classification Plan and appropriated funds. The salary structure for classified personnel consists of eight steps (A through H) with 5 percent increments between each step. The salaries for unclassified personnel other than the County Administrator, County Attorney, and salary supplements for constitutional officers are determined by the County Administrator. The unclassified category of personnel generally includes those employees in positions of assistant county administrator and department head. Funds for 5 percent salary increases are included in the approved County budget. In the approval of the Classification Plan for fiscal year 1987-88, the Board of Supervisors reaffirms the authority of the County Administrator to determine salaries and to approve personnel actions for all classified and unclassified employees with the exception of salaries of Board of Supervisors' members, the County Attorney, the County Administrator, and any salary supplements approved for constitutional officers. FISCAL IMPACT:�' �-- The cost of funding the 1987-88 Classification Plan is incorporated in the budget previously approved by the Board of Supervisors. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the Classification Plan for fiscal year 1987-88 and reaffirm the authority of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator to determine salaries and otherwise implement the Classification Plan for the fiscal year 1987-88. RESOLUTION: YES NO ACTION SUBMITTED BY: D. K. Cook Director of Human Resources APPROVED: zz Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved (X) Motion By: BLJ/AHB to approve Brittle Denied ( ) classification plan for 987-88 Garrett Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) McGraw To Nickens cc: File Keith Cook John Hubbard John Chambliss Tim Gubala County Attorney VOTE No Yes Abs X A-52687-5 ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUBJECT: VDOT Matching Fund Request for Burnham Road Pavement Improvement COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Code of Virginia provides that counties may request matching funds from VDOT to upgrade or maintain roads in the Secondary Highway System. Rather than waiting for four (4) to five (5) years to have their road improved through the Secondary Highway Construction Program, the residents of Burnham Road (Route 1596) have expressed a desire to pay $5,642.00 to match VDOT Funds and have their road upgraded from surface treatment to plant mix. FISCAL IMPACT:` None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board request VDOT for a matching allocation of $5,642.00 to upgrade Burnham Road from surface treatment to plant mix. SUBMITTED hn A. Peters, III, P. ssistant Director of ngineering h;. 1 APPROVED: It Elmer C. odg County Administrator Approved (X) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to cc: ACTION Motion .LGIAHR . approve staff recommPnda-Fion -- File John Hubbard John Peters Phil Henry 2 C VOTE No Yes Abs Brittle X Garrett --x— Johnson X McGraw X Nickens X AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 26, 1987 RESOLUTION NO.52687-6 APPROVING CONSTRUCTION PRIORITIES FOR THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM FOR ROANOKE COUNTY FOR FISCAL YEAR 1987-88 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The Board does hereby establish for fiscal year 1987-88 those certain construction fund priorities for the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County as set out on that certain list of priorities with recommended amendments as presented to the Board at its meeting on May 26, 1987; and 2. That a copy of this resolution duly attested be forthwith forwarded to the Virginia Department of Transportation Salem Residency office along with a duly attested copy of said priority list with amendments by the Clerk to the Board. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: None A COPY - TESTE JY - Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5/27/87 CC: File John A. Peters, Assistant Director of Engineering Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation J. A-52687-7 _ ITEM NUMBER �f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD A -r THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRA'T'ION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUBJECT: Request for Authorization to Establish a Water System for Thousand Oaks Subdivision. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The proposed Thousand Oaks Subdivision is a 190 lot subdivision located off Yellow Mountain Road as indicated on the attached map. The developer, Don Bandy, has requested that the County extend an existing County water line to provide water service to this subdivision. The Utility Department will not approve the extension at this time due to a planned re -alignment of Yellow Mountain Road by the Virginia Department of Transportation. Mr. Bandy wishes to begin development of Thousand Oaks as soon as Possible, and does not want to delay this development until the roadway re -alignment is established. At the suggestion of County staff, Mr. Bandy would like to establish a complete water system under the provision of the County Water Ordinance, Section 20.1-5 (2) (a) as amended by Ordinance No. 1512. Under the provisions of this ordinance, prior to approval to establish a complete water system, the applicant shall agree to "provide a complete water system to serve the new area, convey the water distribution system within such new area to the County at no cost, and convey all supply and treatment facilities and other appurtenances to the County at cost, and pay the existing connection fee." This water system will be built to the County standards specified in the Water Ordinance, and will allow the developer to begin his subdivision without waiting for the realignment of Yellow Mountain Road. The Developer will then convey the facility to the County at his cost. The agreement between Mr. Bandy and the County would include the above statement on conveyance of the water system, and with payment for the cost of the supply, treatment, oversized lines, and storage facilities made by a 100% credit of the off-site facilities fees associated with the Thousand Oaks Subdivision until such time as the Developer is reimbursed the entire cost for those facilities. The Developer, however, would pay the appropriate portion of the basic connection fee for water which would reduce the actual cost of each meter installed, which is presently $20.00. FISCAL IMPACT: I,' ' . i There is no direct impact on the Utility funds. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the County Administrator be authorized to execute an agreement with the developer as provided by the Water Ordinance and with the terms as stated above. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: r0.�� sir,✓ C1iffo raig Elmer C. Hodg' Director of Utilities County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved ( A Motion by: HCN/BLJ to approve No Yes Abs Denied ( ) staff recommendation Brittle X Received ( ) Garrett X Referred Johnson X To McGraw X Nickens X cc: File John Hubbard Clifford Craig AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 26, 1987 RESOLUTION NO.52687-8 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for May 26, 1987, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items. 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows: 1. Minutes of Meeting - April 14, 1987 2. Request to classify Eastern Bypass as a "Rural Other Principal Arterial" and add to the Federal Aid Primary System" 3. Revision of the Secondary Highway System concerning alteration of Route 711. 4. Acceptance of Water facilities serving Edinburgh Square. 5. Acceptance of Water and Sewer facilities serving Kingston Court, Section 1. 6. Approval of Special Leave Extension for Workers' Compensation Injury. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: None A COPY - TESTE Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5/27/87 CC: File John A. Peters, Assistant Director of Engineering Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering D. Keith Cook, Director of Human Resources Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator A -52687-8a ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUBJECT: Classify Eastern Bypass as a "Rural Other -Primary Arterial" and add to the Federal Aid Primary System COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As part of the attempt to construct an Eastern Bypass from Route 220 South to Interstate 81, VDOT is requesting the use of Federal Funds to defer part of the ultimate construction cost. In order to assist the State in qualifying for Federal Funding, the Board of Supervisors needs to classify the future Eastern Bypass from Route 220 to Route 116 as a "Rural Other Principal Arterial" and add the proposed road to the Federal -Aid Primary System." FISCAL IMPACT:�� w None. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board add the Eastern Bypass from Route 220 to Route 116 to the Functional Classification System as a "Rural Other Principal Arterial" and to the Federal -Aid System as a "Federal -Aid Primary." SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: n A. Peters, III, P. E. istant Director of ineering 1 Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved Approved (X) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion staff cc: File John Peters John Hubbard ACTION by: HCN/BLJ to approve reconunen ation Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens VOTE No ,.7--" -21- Yes Abs X X X X X AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 26, 1987 RESOLUTION 52687-8.b REVISING THE SECONDARY HIGHWAY SYSTEM CONCERNING THE RELOCATION OF ROUTE 711 WHEREAS, Secondary Route 711 from Route 221 to 0.07 Mi. W. Route 221, a distance of 0.07 miles, has been altered, and a new road has been constructed and approved by the State Highway Commissioner, which new road serves the same citizens as the road so altered; and WHEREAS, certain sections of this new road follow new locations, these being shown on the attached sketch titled, "Changes in Secondary System Due to Relocation and Construction on Route 221, Project 0221, 080-106, PE -101 RW -201, C-501 dated at Richmond, Virginia March 26, 1986." NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the portion of Secondary Route 711, i.e. Section 2 , shown in red on the sketch titled, "changes in Secondary System Due to Relocation and Construction on Route 221 Project 0221,080-106, PE -101, RW -201, C-501, dated at Richmond, Virginia March 26, 1986 a total distance of 0.07 miles be, and hereby is, added to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to Section 33.1-229 of the code of Virginia as amended;and FURTHER, that the section of old location, i.e., Section 1 shown in blue on the afore -mentioned sketch, a total distance of 0.07 miles, be, and the same hereby is, abandoned as a public road, pursuant to Section 33.1-155 of the Code of Virginia as amended. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: None A COPY - TESTE Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5/27/87 CC: File John A. Peters, Assistant Director of Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Va. Department of Transportation k A -52687-8.c ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water lines serving Edinburgh Square COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: �tii4rn�r►�� 11i�- i� SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The developer of Edinburgh Square, Edinburgh Square Founda- tion, has requested that Roanoke County accept the deed conveying the water lines serving the development along with all necessary easements. The water lines are installed as shown on Engineering Plans prepared by Collins & Kronstadt entitled Edinburgh Square, dated March 15, 1985, which are on file in the Public Facilities Depart- ment. The water line construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the county. FISCAL IMPACT: The value of the water construction is $14,500.00 RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: Phill'p T. Henry P. E. Elmer C. Hodge Engineering Director County Administrator Approved (X) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to cc: File Phillip Henry Clifford Craig John Hubbard ACTION VOTE Motion by: HCN/BLJ to approve `T 4/ gl... No Yes Abs Brittle X Garrett X Johnson X McGraw X Nickens X A -52687-8.d ITEM NUMBER ✓ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUBJECT: Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Kingston Court, Section 1 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The developer of Section 1, Kingston Court, Valley Developers, Inc., has requested that Roanoke County accept the deed conveying the water and sewer lines serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sewer lines are installed as shown on engineering plans prepared by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates entitled, Section 1, Kingston Court dated March 27" 1986, which are on file in the Public Facilities Department. The water and sewer line construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT: The value of the water and sewer construction are $24,250.00 and $28,695.00 respectively. RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. 1 SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: 5 cc: File Phillip Henry Clifford Craig John Hubbard 2 Philri—pIT. Henry Elmer C. Hodge Director of Engieering County Administrator Approved ---------------------------------------------- (X) Motion by:, ACTION VOTE HCN/BLJ to approve No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Brittle X Received ( ) Garrett X Referred Johnson X to McGraw X Nickens X cc: File Phillip Henry Clifford Craig John Hubbard 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 26, 1987 RESOLUTION 52687-9 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO THE ROCK DRILL DIVISION OF THE INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY FOR WINNING THE 1986 UNITED STATES SENATE PRODUCTIVITY AWARD BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, the Rock Drill Division of the Ingersoll-Rand Company is located in Roanoke County and provides employment for over 525 people in the Roanoke Valley; and WHEREAS, Ingersoll-Rand is renowned world-wide for its engineering excellence and exceptionally high quality products; and WHEREAS, in 1986 the Rock Drill Division Performance Bonus Plan was implemented in Roanoke County to create a commitment by all Rock Drill people to competitiveness, improved performance and cost reduction; and WHEREAS, this plan provides a monetary reward to employees who meet or exceed the business goals set, and gives them an opportunity to become "partners" in the business; and WHEREAS, the Rock Drill Division of Ingersoll-Rand Company has received the 1986 United States Senate Productivity Award for implementation of this plan. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County congratulates the Rock Drill Division of Ingersoll-Rand for receiving this high honor; and J BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County extends its best wishes to Joe P. Handerhand, Steve Goldfarb, and all the employees of Ingersoll-Rand for continued success in their endeavors. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Brittle and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: None A COPY - TESTE Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5/27/87 CC: File Resolutions of Congratulations File r A-52687-10 ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUBJECT: Report on the Drainage Study COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is the drainage study of the Palm Valley/Kentland neighborhoods. The study generally outlines the responsibilities for flood and drainage control, identification of some of the major issues involved, and recommends certain short term and long term solutions as follows: Short Term Solutions: 1. Adoption of the Virginia Department of Transportation Standards. 2. Adoption of the Roanoke County Construction Standards. 3. Inspection of drainage improvements during constructions. 4. Inspection of drainage facilities. 5. Amendment to the Floodplain Ordinance. All of these recommendations are highly desirable and feasible. Implementation of these standards will help prevent further drainage problems with future construction. Long Term Solutions: On a long-term basis, the County should develop or participate in the development of regional watershed plans. It may be necessary to establish a drainage utility to help finance the cost of ongoing drainage maintenance. Under this concept, homeowners and business will be assessed a fee depending upon the amount of water runoff from their property. Funds received under this program would be used for maintenance of streams, retention ponds, and drainage basins. Palm Valley/Kentland Neighborhoods: The two areas in the County of the greatest concern at the present time are the Palm Valley and Kentland neighborhoods. Staff recommends improvements to both of these areas to help alleviate the problem of flooded basements. In the Palm Valley area, the staff recommends redesign and enlargement of the drainage flume that carries off water from the shopping centers on Williamson Road. In the Kentland area, staff recommends replacing the culvert under the highway with a larger size pipe. In both areas, extensive cleanup is required of the creeks, and it may be necessary to install storm drains as well. Staff also identified other problem areas which should be addressed after the Palm valley and Kentland areas have been corrected. As much of the work as possible should be done with County staff, and the major projects should be contracted to take advantage of the construction season. It is anticipated that much of the construction work in these two neighborhoods can be completed this summer, with cleanup of the creeks to continue throughout the winter and spring of next year. This study was prepared by Phillip Henry, John Peters, George Simpson and Lita Handy of the County Engineering Department, with assistance from other other County offices and various agencies. The staff is to be commended for the thoroughness of the report. FISCAL IMPACT• The cost of continuing the drainage program and the improvements to the Kentland/Palm Valley areas is approximately $200,000. If the Board chooses to increase the decal fees, approximately $260,000 will be generated. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the decal fees be increased, and $200,000 of the $260,000 be used to fund these improvements, and that the drainage problems in the Palm Valley and Kentland areas be addressed first. It is further recommended that a work session be held on June 9, 1987 to study the changes necessary to the County ordinances. Following the work session, the drainage standards should be adopted and the staff should proceed with first and second readings of the ordinances necessary to implement the standards. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approved (X) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To cc: ACTION Motion by: LG/BLJ moved to approve drainage study, allocate $200,000 froiBrittle increased_ decal fees establish Palm Garrett Valley and Kentland as first priority Johnson and set work session for June 9. 1987McGraw Nickens File Phillip Henry John Peters John Hubbard Tim Gubala VOTE No Yes Abs X X X X X AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MAY 26, 1987 ORDINANCE 52687-11 AMENDING CHAPTER 13, "OFFENSES -MISCELLANEOUS," SECTIONS 13 AND 14 OF THE ROANOKE. COUNTY CODE CONCERNING UNLAWFUL DISPOSAL OF WASTE MATERIALS AND UNLAWFUL ACCUMULATIONS OF TRASH AND WEEDS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Chapter 13, "Offenses -Miscellaneous," Section 13-13. "Unlawful disposal of rubbish or other waste materials," of the Roanoke County Code be amended as follows: Sec. 13-13. Unlawful disposal of rubbish or other waste material. (a) No person shall dump or dispose of or leave or cause to be thrown any rubbish, tin cans, trash, garbage or other waste substance or material in or upon and along any street, road, highway, park or alley in the county; nor shall any person dispose of, dump or throw any rubbish, tin cans, trash, gar- bage or any other waste material or substance upon any vacant lots or property in the county which have not been selected, approved and designated as a garbage or trash dis- posal area by the health department of the county. 2. That Chapter 13, "Offenses -Miscellaneous," Section 13-14. "Unlawful accumulations of trash and growth of weeds; public nuisances and abatement thereof," of the Roanoke County Code be amended as follows: Sec. 13-14. Unlawful accumulation of trash and growth of weeds; public nuisances and abatement thereof. (a) For the purposes of this section, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them by this subsection: (4) Parcel: Any real estate, or any interest therein, situ- ate, lying and being in the county on Which any in any areas zoned for residential, business, commercial, or indus- trial uses or institution&+ activity is conducted or on which any vacant residentie1; commereia1; industriai7 or insti- G 1987. tutional building or strueture is leeated or in any subdivi- sion. (6) Subdivision: Any tract or parcel of land divided into three f3l two (2) or more lots or parcels, eont&ining three-fourths of an &ere of land; for the purpose, whether immediate or future, of transfer of ownership or development, as otherwise defined in the Roanoke County Subdivision Ordin- ance. (c) Weeds growing between May first and 6etober first on and trash lying on any parcel shall constitute a public nui- sance. It shall be unlawful to cause or maintain a public nuisance with respect to any parcel. An owner shall abate any public nuisance with respect to this parcel. Between May fifteenth and dnne fifteenth and between August first and Sep- tember first of eaeh year Every owner of real estate situate in the county shall cause to be cut therefrom all weeds and to remove therefrom all trash. Any owner who shall violate the provisions of this subsection shall be deemed guilty of a Class 4 misdemeanor. 2. The effective date of this amendment shall be June 1, On motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: None A COPY - TESTE Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5/27/87 CC: File County Attorney Commonwealth's Attorney Magistrate Sheriff's Department Main Library Roanoke Law Library Zoning Administrator Department of Development AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MAY 26, 1987 ORDINANCE 52687-12 AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF EASEMENTS, CASTLE ROCK SEWER LINE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the acquisition of approximately eight (8) easements for the Castle Rock Sewer Line was held on May 12, 1987. A second reading on this matter was held on May 26, 1987. 2. That these easements are for underground sewer lines for the Castle Rock Project. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro- perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: None A COPY - TESTE -Ad Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5/27/87 CC: File County Attorney Real Estate Assessor Director of Utilities AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MAY 26, 1987 ORDINANCE 52687-13 AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF EASEMENT, BRAMBLETON AVENUE HIGHWAY PROJECT BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of §18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the acquisi- tion of one (1) easement for the Brambleton Avenue Highway Pro- ject was held on May 12, 1987. was held on May 26, 1987. A second reading on this matter 2. That this easement is for underground water lines for the Brambleton Avenue Highway Project. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro- perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Brittle, seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: None aossassv agpgsa TvaH saTgTTTgn 30 aogoajTQ Aauaoggv Aquno0 aTT3 :0O L8/9Z/S saosTnjadng 3o pagos dquno0 axouvoH xzaTO dgndau 'uaTTV •H AJPW sisal - Ad00 v w A -52687-8.e ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER. MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUBJECT: Extension of Special Leave Request For Workers' Compensation Injury - Shirlee E. Hill COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This is a request for a special leave extension for Mr. Shirlee E. Hill, Refuse Collector, who sustained a job-related injury on January 16, 1987. Approval of a Special Leave Request permits regular employees to receive full pay and county benefits; and, in turn, employees must sign over.any workers' compensation checks to the county. Mr. Hill was granted a special leave of 90 work days which expired May 22, 1987. Mr. Hill continues to have problems relating to his injury and is unable to return to work at this time. In accordance with Section VIII -C of the Employee Handbook, an additional sixty work days may be granted by the Board of Supervisors upon recommendation of both the department head and county administrator. FISCAL IMPACT: The total salary cost for sixty (60) work days, less workers' compensation payments returned to the county, is $816. The total fringe benefit cost for the sixty (60) days is $533. Total budget cost for salary and fringe benefits is $1,349. An appropriation of funds will not be required for the extension of this Special Leave Request. RECOMMENDATIONS: It has been recommended by Mr. John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator for Public Facilities, that the sixty-day extension be approved. SUBMITTED BY: D. K. Cook Director of Human Resources APPROVED: e ri Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator RESOLUTION: YES NO ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (X) Motion By: HCN/BLJ to approve Brittle X Denied ( ) Garrett X Received ( ) Johnson X Referred ( ) McGraw X To Nickens X. cc: File Keith Cook John Hubbard Clifford Craig A-52687-14 Item Z AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUBJECT: Request for authorization to Trl:lnsfer of Hollins Water System to Hollins Community Development Corporation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In order to receive grant funds from Farmers Home Administration (FmHA) for the proposed construction of the sewer and water system in the "Old Fields" area of the Hollins Community, it is required that the Hollins Community Development Corporation own the water system and associated property and right-of-ways. The new utility systems will be owned by the Hollins Community Development Corporation. Under a separate agreement, Roanoke County will continue to operate these systems. A part of this transfer will be the requirement that connection fees to the Hollins Community Development Corporation system will be the same as established for a County utility system. All off-site facility or availability fees collected for connection to this system must be applied to the FmHA loan balance until such time that Roanoke County purchases the utility system. The Department of Utilities concurs with this request and recommends waiving of provisions of the water ordinance which prohibits private water systems. FISCAL 1� IMPACT The fiscal impact of this transfer will not require additional funds from Roanoke County. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize the County Adminis- trator to execute the necessary documents to transfer the Hollins water system to the Hollins Community Development Corporation with terms as stated above. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: _ i l 'I, llkz Sue Palmer, Community Elmer C. Hodge, Jr. Development Coordinator County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------ Approved (X) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To ACTION Motion by: BLJ/AHB to approve staff recommendation cc: File Tim Gubala Sue Palmer Clifford Craig John Hubbard VOTE No Yes Abs Brittle X Garrett X Johnson X McGraw X Nickens X