Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout8/11/1987 - Adopted Board RecordsA-81187-1 ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 11, 1987 SUBJECT: Request for funding from Cultural Enrichment Organizations COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S SUMMARY OF INFOVAATION: Last year, the 1986/87 budget included $15,000 for cultural enrichment programs, and all of the funds were allocated to Center in the Square. The budget for 1987/88 includes $20,000 for this purpose. This year the following three organizations have requested funds: Organization Center in the Square Arts Council of Roanoke Valley The Roanoke Symphony TOTAL: Funds Requested $50,000 $ 3,300 $ 5,000 $58,300 Center in the Square benefits over 12,000 Roanoke County students through its programs, including the Center Scholars Program which is a cooperative venture with Roanoke City, Roanoke County and Salem Schools. This is an intensive college level 9 -week course incorporating all aspects of performing arts. The Arts Council of Roanoke Valley serves as a promoter, fiscal agent, and occasional funder of all arts groups in the Valley such as Artemis, The Acting Company, the Roanoke Symphony, the Virginia Watercolor Society, and the annual Perry F. Kendig Award. The Roanoke Symphony offers a variety of concerts throughout the year with special guest artists at each concert. FISCAL IMPACT: None. $20,000 was budgeted in fiscal year 1987/88. This agenda item only allocates the funds to the individual organizations at the Board's discretion. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that each organization receive a portion of the budgeted funds, and that the Board allocate these monies at their discretion. Elmer C. Hod County Administrator -----f--------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Abstai: Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C." Nickens/Steven No Yes Abs Denied ( ) A. McGraw motion to allocate Brittle x Received ( ) $15,000 - Center in the Square Garrett x Referred $ 2,500 - Roanoke Symphony Johnson x To $ 2,500 - Arts Council McGraw x _ Nickens x cc: File Reta Busher Diane Hyatt Z-1- U J. 1 U/ - L ITEM NUMBER — 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTYrADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 11, 1987 SUBJECT: Appalachian Power Company Off -Site Water Facilities COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS : SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Appalachian Power Company is developing a site located north of the Loch Haven Road/Route 311 intersection at Hanging Rock. Water service to this site will require a 6,000 foot extension of the existing 12" water line that currently ends at the VDOT building on Route 311, a small booster pump station, and a water storage reservoir. The estimated cost of these water facilities is $310,000. Appalachian Power Company has drilled one well on their property which would only produce 15 gallons per minute and is not a suitable supply; there- fore, they would be required to use a public water supply. As noted in the fiscal impact below, Roanoke County's share of the project would be approximately $115,540. This amount is less than the construction cost of the water storage reservoir alone. In addition, future connections which will be made along the 6,000 foot extension will produce* off-site facilities fees in excess of $500,000. Appalachian Power Company has requested that Roanoke County participate in the cost of installing the off-site water facilities in lieu of using a reimbursement agreement. Staff proposes that Roanoke County provide the necessary water facilities to the APCO site with the use of water revenue bond funds. FISCAL IMPACT: The facilities which are proposed to be constructed by APCO will require a 6" domestic water service and a 12" separate fire service. The total water connection fees that will be paid is $194,460.20. Therefore, the required participation for Roanoke County would be approximately $115,540. The initial water connection fees will cover 62% of the cost, and future connections to this water line will generate in excess of 150% of the total cost of the water facilities provided. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends participating in the extension of this water line. If the Board approves, the following actions must be taken: (1) Approve County participation in the extension of this water line; (2) Approve the issuance of revenue bonds (through Virginia Resources Authority) in the amount of $115,540; (3) Authorize County Administrator to execute all necessary documents. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED' BY: /1--7- -Z L i nJ C i r Craig, P.E. E er C. g Uti ities Director County Administrator -------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (yj Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Harry C. No Yes Abs ain Denied ( ) Nickens to approve staff Brittle x Received ( ) recommendation Garrett x Referred Johnson x To " McGraw x Nickens x cc: File Clifford Craig John Hubbard AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 11, 1987 RESOLUTION 81187-3 REQUESTING APPROPRIATION FOR ROANOKE COUNTY SHARE OF STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION. OGDEN ROAD (ROUTE 867) PROJECT WHEREAS, Ogden Road (Route 867) provides an important urban highway link to commercial property in Roanoke County; and the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors desires to improve this commercial link; and WHEREAS, Route 867 was placed on the Secondary Highway Six -Year Construction Plan by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and was assigned a project number of 0867-080-202•,C501, by the Virginia Department of Transportation; and WHEREAS, Virginia Department of Transportation Policy Memorandum DPM -8-6 requires participation by localities for portions of storm sewer construction costs if curb and gutter "is desired"; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transporatation has determined that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors is responsible for $10,200 on Project 0867-080-202,C501 for its portion of storm sewer construction. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors appropriates the sum of $10,200 for its share of the total construction cost for the Ogden Road Project 0867-080-202,C501. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Brittle, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk 8/13/87 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File John Peters, Assistant Director of Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Fred Altizer, Va. Department of Transportation ITEM NUMBER E __ "/-- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: August 11, 1987 SUBJECT: Request to Appropriate Monies for the Purpose of Sponsoring Additional Student Positions at the Governor's School COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Following the approval of the School budget in May of this year, the Board of Supervisors received numerous requests for funding of student positions in the Governor's School if additional funds became available. The Board of Supervisors has always been supportive of the School's needs, and asked the County staff to review the request in an effort to fund the positions in the Governor's School. The School Administration has suggested funding for these positions come from the remaining balance of the 1986-87 School budget, with the understanding that if there are insufficient funds, the balance will be taken from the current year's School budget. The exact amount of the balance will not be determined for several weeks when the annual audit is completed. At the budget work sessions in April, the School Administration also pointed out the need to replace many school buses. The Board of Supervisors and County staff share this concern. As of June 30, 1987, there was a balance of approximately $117,000 in the School Bus Fund. Staff recommends that the monies remaining at year end after funding of the Governor's School be earmarked for the purchase of school buses. (,,FISCAL IMPACT: (/ Twenty-six thousand dollars should be appropriated from beginning balance to finance the additional positions at the Governor's School. The remainder of the School Fund balance for the 1986-87 fiscal year is to be placed in the School Bus account. — �/ RECOMMENDATION: If the Board of Supervisors wishes to fund the Governor's School, the following actions are recommended: 'Allow the Schools to retain any unexpended funds from the 1986-87 budget to be used in the following manner: It is estimated that funding of the Governor's School will require between $18,000 and $26,000. Designate that this amount be taken from the unexpended funds from 1986/87. Allocate any monies remaining after funding the Governor's School to the School Bus Fund. SUBMITTED BY: John M. Chambl'ss, Asst. County Administrator - Management Services cc: Bayes Wilson Diane Hyatt Reta Busher APPROVED: SL n Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/Bob No Yes Abs Denied ( ) L. Johnson to approve staff Brittle x Received ( ) recommendation Garrett x Referred Johnson x To McGraw x Nickens x cc: File Bayes Wilson Diane Hyatt Reta Busher John Chambliss AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 11, 1987 RESOLUTION 81187-5 ENDORSING A DIRECT ACCESS ROAD BETWEEN BLACKSBURG AND THE ROANOKE VALLEY BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, The Governor of Virginia has included as part of his economic development strategy for the Commonwealth the improvement of transportation facilities; and WHEREAS, the lack of direct access to Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University from the Roanoke Valley is an obstacle to the continued economic development potential of the region; and WHEREAS, a study commissioned by the Town of Blacksburg shows that a new road leading from the Virginia Tech Corporate Research Center east to a point near the existing intersection of Route 641 with Interstate 81 is the best solution to the problems associated with the access of the Roanoke Valley to Blacksburg and Virginia Tech. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County that: 1. The Board joins with the Town of Blacksburg and Virginia Tech in requesting that the Commonwealth Transportation Board and the Virginia Department of Transportation accept the corridor solution the Town of Blacksburg has identified as the best answer to the needs of the Commonwealth, and provide the funds necessary for timely completion of the project; and 2. The Clerk to the Board is directed to mail copies of this resolution to members of the Commonwealth Transportation Board. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Gairett, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 8/13/87 cc: File Mayor, Town of Blacksburg Va. Department of Transportation John Peters, Assistant Director of Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Commonwealth Transportation Board w AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 11, 1987 ORDINANCE 81187-6 APPROVING THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SALEM AND THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE REGARDING ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORIES OF ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has executed an Agreement dated March 3, 198711 by and between the City of Salem and the County of Roanoke; and WHEREAS, the Agreement has been reviewed and approved by the Commission on Local Government; and WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke has advertised its inten- tion to approve this Agreement on July 14, 1987, and July 21, 1987, in the'Roanoke Times & World News, a newspaper of general circulation in this jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, the first reading and public hearing on this ordinance was held on July 28, 1987, and the second reading on this ordinance was held on August 11, 1987; and WHEREAS, the respective localities are desirous of re- solving these issues. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Board of Super- visors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the Memorandum of Agree- ment dated March 3, 1987, a true copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein, is hereby adopted and approved. The County Attorney is hereby directed to petition the Circuit Court for an order establishing the rights of the respec- tive local governments as set forth under the terms of this Agree- ment, and to take such other action as may be necessary to accomp- lish these purposes. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk 8/13/87 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney The Honorable James Taliaferro, City of Salem AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 11, 1987 ORDINANCE 81187-7 AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN WATER SYSTEMS WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter requires that the acquisition of real estate or any interest therein be accomplished by ordinance, and that the first reading on this ordinance was held on July 28, 1987, and the second read- ing on this ordinance was held on August 11, 1987; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County can provide a better, more com- plete water system by owning and operating all water systems in the County, and can better satisfy public health, safety and wel- fare standards and requirements; and WHEREAS, the citizens of Roanoke County have expressed their support for the acquisition of water systems and wells through their positive votes for the 1985 and 1986 bond referen- da. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Super- visors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the acquisition of the following water systems within the funds and funding sources indicated is hereby approved and authorized: Water System Cost Funding Source Cherokee Hills $ 67,000 1986 Bonds Forest Edge 131,000 1986 Bonds Carriage Hills/Parker 35,000 1986 Bonds Crescent Heights 60,000 1985 Bonds Sherry Court 61300 Utility Fund 2. That an additional ten percent (10%) contingency account for legal, engineering, and miscellaneous expenses is hereby authorized. 3. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to take such actions and execute such documents, all upon a form approved by the County Attorney, as may be necessary to accomp- lish the purposes and intent of this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Johnson NAYS: Nickens A COPY - TESTE: .-11�)'Z'� 'AV. Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk 8/13/87 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 11, 1987 ORDINANCE 81187-8 VACATING THE PLAT OF RAMSGATE COURT SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, Jerry W. and Janat L. Bush have petitioned the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, to vacate the plat of the Ramsgate Court Subdivision; and WHEREAS, the petitioners are the owners of the property constituting this.subdivision, except for three (3) lots therein; and WHEREAS, a public hearing and first reading on this ordinance was held on July 28, 1987, and the second reading on this ordinance was held on August 11, 1987. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. That the plat of the Ramsgate Court Subdivision recorded on March 3, 1973, and found in Plat Book 8, page 38, among the records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia is hereby vacated. 2. That the Clerk of the Circuit Court is authorized to take such action as may be necessary to accomplish the purpose and intent of this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 8/13/87 cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director of Development Review Real Estate Assessor Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning t AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 11, 1987 ORDINANCE NO. 81187-9 AMENDING CHAPTER 22 OF THE 1985 ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, "WATER" ESTABLISHING CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTING AND TESTING OF WELLS FOR PUB- LIC WATER SUPPLIES WHEREAS, the Board finds that the improper construction of wells can adversely affect aquifers as groundwater resources in Roanoke County. Consistent with the duty to protect these groundwater resources and to safeguard the public welfare, safety, and health, it is declared to be the policy of Roanoke County to require that the construction and location of wells conform to reasonable requirements; and WHEREAS, the establishment of these requirements are authorized by Section 15.1-292.2, Section 15.1-299 and Sections 15.1-341, et seq. of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held on July 28, 1987, and the second reading on this ordinance was held on August 11, 1987. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. That Chapter 22 of the 1985 Roanoke County Code, "Water" (Chapter 20.1 of the 1971 Roanoke County Code) is hereby amended and reenacted as follows: Section 20.1-9 of the 1971 Roanoke County Code is here- by repealed: Wells shall meet state requ+at}ens existing as of the date of eon9traetien7 All wells Shall be elass 1 or 11 wells- Leeation of all wells shall be shown on a plan of the system.- Eaeh well shall have minimum one-fourth ineh air line set to the depth of the pump.- A low water level eantrel shall be provided. - A forty-eight hour pump test shall be required an all wells.- ferd- Ne- 15127} and amended and reenacted: Section 20.1-9. Wells. Wells shall meet state and American Waterworks Associa- tion (AWWA A-100-84) regulations/standards existing as of the date of well construction. In addition to the State regulations, the following shall also be required• Location of all wells shall be shown on a plan of the water system A minimum of two wells must be constructed and placed in service for all public water supply systems. Performance testing of wells shall be in accordance with AWWA A-100-84 Standard for water wells, Section 10. The step -drawdown and constant -rate test shall be used to determine the maximum safe yield for 30 days of continuous use. The 48 hour pump test required by the state shall be performed after the AWWA test. The actual well capacity used to determine the maximum equivalent residential connections shall be the lesser of quantity determined by the AWWA step-drawdown/constant rate test or the 48 hour state requirement test. All well pump tests shall be scheduled with and ob- served by the Utility Director or his designated representative 2. This Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon adoption. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk 8/13/87 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Thomas M. Blaylock, Commonwealth's Attorney Magistrate Sheriff's Department Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Ave., Roanoke Main Libary Roanoke County Code Book AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 11., 1987 ORDINANCE 81187-10 AMENDING AND REENACTING THE ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ROANOKE COUNTY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE TO ADOPT THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DRAINAGE MANUAL AND ROAD AND BRIDGE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHEREAS, a first reading and public hearing concerning this amendment was held on July 28, 1987; the second reading was held on August 11, 1987; and WHEREAS, the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Roanoke County require the adoption of standards and regulations to minimize adverse environmental impacts resulting from the dangers of flooding and the drainage of surface and storm waters;* and WHEREAS, Section 15.1-292, 15.1-466, and 15.1-489 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, authorize the county to adopt ordinances and to exercise such general powers to prevent the pollution of water; to make, erect, and construct drains, sewers, and public ducts; to establish reasonable standards for drainage regulations of subdivisions or developments; and to pro- vide safety from flood, flood protection, and to protect against the loss of life, health, or property from flood and other simi- lar dangers; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County and its citizens have suffered and continue to suffer the harmful effects of flooding and inade- quate drainage of surface waters, and from the volume and velo- city of storm water runoff; and WHEREAS, these hazards and dangers to public health, safety, and welfare are caused in part by climate, topography and the development of land. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Super- visors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the Roanoke County Code is amended and reenacted as follows: 1. Amend Appendix A, the Roanoke County Zoning Ordin- ance, Section 21-104, "Site Plan Review," by revising sub -section C, "Site Plan Preparation," to sub -section (u) to read as fol- lows: ( u ) Pablle storm drainage system, designed in accordance with the current edition of the Virginia Department of Transportation Drainage Manual. 2. Amend Appendix A, the Roanoke County Zoning Ordin- ance, Section 21-104, "Site Plan Review," to add a new sub- section (z) to read as follows: (z) Compliance with the current edition of the Vir- ginia Department of Transportation Road and Bridge Standards and Specifications. 3. Amend Appendix B, the Roanoke County Subdivision Ordinance, Article IV, "Improvements," Section 18, "Plans and specifications generally," by revising sub -section (d) as fol- lows: (1) All storm drainage facilities including on -tract and off -tract drainage and other drainage structures necessary for the proper use and drainage of slopes, streets, highways, and pedestrian ways and for the public safety, shall be designed to convey the flow of surface waters without damage to persons and property. The system shall insure drainage away from buildings and on-site waste disposal sites and septic tank facilities with subsurface disposal fields. The County of Roanoke will require a primarily underground system to accommodate frequent floods and a secondary surface system to accommodate larger less frequent floods. Drainage plans shall be consistent with local regional storm drainage plans or be designed in accordance with the cur- rent edition of the Virginia Department of Transportation Drain- age Manual. The facilities shall be designed to prevent the dis- charge of excess runoff onto the adjacent properties. (2)' Erosion and sediment control measures including planting. (3) Compliance with the current edition of the Vir- inia Department of Transportation Road and Bridqe Standards and Specifications. 4. The effective date of this ordinance shall be August 12, 1987. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 8/13/87 cc: File John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Thomas M. Blaylock, Commonwealth's Attorney Magistrate • Sheriff's Department Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Ave., Roanoke Main Libary Roanoke County Code Book AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 11, 1987 ORDINANCE 81187-11 AMENDING CHAPTER 21 OF THE 1971 ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, "ZONING," AND APPENDIX A OF THE 1985 ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY ADDING CERTAIN PROVISIONS MANDATED BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY TO WIT: DEFINITIONS OF "LOWEST FLOOR," "MANUFACTURED HOME," "MANUFACTURED HOME PARK SUBDIVISION," AND "START OF CONSTRUCTION"; AND REQUIREMENT THAT THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR OBTAIN INFORMATION REGARDING ELEVATION AND OTHER FLOOD- RELATED FACTORS BEFORE ISSUING A ZONING PERMIT WHEREAS, the first reading and public hearing on this ordi- nance was held on July 28, 1987, and the second reading on this ordinance was held on August 11, 1987; and WHEREAS, the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Roanoke County require the adoption of standards and regulations .to minimize adverse environmental impacts resulting from the dangers of flooding and the drainage of surface and storm waters; and WHEREAS, Section 15.1-292, 15.1-466, 15.1-486, 15.1- 489, and 15.1-490 of the of Virginia, 1950, as amended authorize the county to adopt ordinances and to exercise such general powers to prevent the pollution of water; to make, erect, and construct drains, sewers, and public ducts; to establish reason- able standards for drainage regulations of subdivisions or devel- opments; and to provide safety from flood, flood protection, and to protect against the loss of life, health, or property from flood and other similar dangers; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County and its citizens have suffered and continue to suffer the harmful effects of flooding and inade- quate drainage of surface waters, and from the volume and velo- city of storm water runoff; and WHEREAS, these hazards and dangers to public health, safety, and welfare are caused in part by climate, topography and the development of land. WHEREAS, the Federal Emergency Management Agency has mandated that the County follow the procedures contained within these amendments in order to insure continuation of federal flood insurance for certain residents of Roanoke County. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended and re-enacted as follows: l.. Amend and re-enact Appendix A of the 1985 Roanoke County Code, Zoning Ordinance, Article V, "Special Public Inter- est Regulations", as follows: ARTICLE V. SPECIAL PUBLIC INTEREST REGULATIONS § 21-61. Floodplains. The purpose of these provisions is to prevent the following hazards: the loss of life and property, the creation of health and safety hazards, the disruption of commerce and governmental services, the extraordinary and unnecessary expenditure of public funds for flood protection and relief, and the impairment of the tax base by the means provided here: (a) Regulating uses, activities, and development which, acting alone or in combination with other existing or future uses, activities, and development, will cause unacceptable increases in flood heights, velocities, and frequencies. K (b) Restricting or prohibiting certain uses, activities, and development from locating within areas subject to flood- ing. (c) Requiring all those uses, activities, and developments that do occur in flood -prone areas to be protected and/or flood -proofed against flooding and flood damage. (d) Protecting individuals from buying lands and structures which are unsuited for intended purposes because of flood hazards. A. Applicability. These provisions shall apply to all lands within the jurisdiction of Roanoke County and identified as* being flood -prone as stipu- lated in this section. B. Compliance. (a) No land shall hereafter be developed and no structure shall be located, relocated, constructed, reconstructed, enlarged, or structurally altered except in full compli- ance with the terms and provisions of this section and any other applicable ordinances and regulations which apply to uses within the jurisdiction of this section. (b) This ordinance supersedes any regulations currently in effect in flood -prone areas. However, any underlying regu- lations shall remain in full force and effect to the ex- tent that those provisions are more restrictive. C. Definitions. For the purpose of the Floodplain Section of this ordinance these terms are defined as follows: (a) Development - any man-made change to improved or unim- proved real estate including but not limited to buildings or other structures, the placement of mobile homes, streets and other paving, utilities, filling, grading, excavation, mining, dredging, or drilling operations. (b) Flood - a general and temporary inundation of normally dry land areas. (c) Floodplain - (1) a relatively flat or low land area adjoin- ing a river, stream, or watercourse which is subject to 3 partial or complete inundation; (2) an area subject to the unusual and rapid accumulation or runoff of surface waters from any source. (d) Floodway - the designated area of the floodplain required to carry and discharge flood waters of a given magnitude. (e) Lowest floor - the lowest floor includes the lowest en- closed area (including basement) of any structure. An unfinished or flood resistant enclosure usable solely for parking of vehicles, building access, or stora,le, in an area other than a basement area, is not considerEd a build- ing's lowest floor, provided that such enclosure is not built so as to render the structure in violation of the applicable non -elevation design requirements of this ordi- nance. (f) Manufactured home - a structure, transportable in one or more sections, which is built on a permanent chassis and is designed for use with or without a permanent foundation when connected to the required utilities. The term "manu- factured home" also includes park trailers, travel trail- ers, and other similar vehicles placed on a site for greater than 180 consecutive days. (g) Manufactured home park or subdivision - a parcel (or con- tiguous parcels) of land divided into two or more manufac- tured home lots for rent or sale. (h) One Hundred Year Flood - a flood that, on the average, is likely to occur once every 100 years (i.e., that has a one percent chance of occurring each year, although the flood may occur in any year). (i) Start of construction - "start of construction" includes "substantial improvement" and means the date the building permit was issued, provided the actual start of construc- tion, repair, reconstruction, placement, or other improve- ment was within 180 days of the permit date. The "actual start" means either the first placement of permanent con- struction of a structure on a site, such as the pouring of slab or footings, the installation of piles, the construc- tion of columns, or any work beyond the stage of excava- tion; or the placement of a manufactured home on a foundation. Permanent construction does not include land preparation, such as clearing, grading and filling; nor does it include the installation of streets and/or walk- ways; nor does it include excavation for a basement, footings, piers, or foundations or the erection of tempo- rary forms; nor does it include the installation on the 4 property of accessory buildings, such as garages or sheds not occupied as dwelling units or 'not part of the main structure. D. Floodplain area. The various floodplain areas shall include areas subject to inundation by waters of the one hundred (100) year flood. The primary basis for the delineation of these areas shall be the Flood Insurance Study for Roanoke County prepared by the U-S- Department- a€- Hee94:ng- and -Urban- Bevelepment;Federal Emergency Management Agency, Federal Insurance Administration, dated 9eteber-177-1978December 4, 1985 and subsequent amendments. (a)' The Floodway is delineated for purposes of this section using the criteria that a certain area within the flood- plain must be capable of carrying the waters of the one hundred (100) year flood without increasing the water surface elevation of that flood more than one (1) foot at any point. These Floodways are specifically defined in Table 2 of the above referenced Flood Insurance Study and shown on the Flood Boundary and Floodway Map accompanying that study. (b) The Flood -Fringe shall be that area of the 100 -year flood- plain not included in the Floodway. The basis for the outermost boundary of the Flood -Fringe shall be the one hundred (100) year flood elevations contained in the flood profiles of the above referenced Flood Insurance Study and as shown on the Flood Boundary and Floodway Map accompany- ing the study. (c) The Approximated Floodplain shall be that floodplain area for which no detailed flood profiles or elevations are provided, but where a one hundred (100) year floodplain boundary has been approximated. Such areas are shown on the Flood Boundary and Floodway Map and Flood Insurance Rate Map. Where the specific 100 -year flood elevation cannot be determined for this area using other sources of data such as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Floodplain Information Reports, U.S. Geological Survey Flood Prone Quadrangles, etc., then the applicant for the proposed use, development and/or activity shall determine this ele- vation in accordance with hydrologic and hydraulic engi- neering techniques. Hydrologic and hydraulic analyses shall be undertaken only by professional engineers or others of demonstrated qualifications, who shall certify that the technical methods used correctly reflect current- ly accepted technical concepts. Calculations for the design flood shall be related to existing land use and 5 potential development under existing zoning. Studies, analyses, computations, etc., shall 'be submitted in suffi- cient detail to allow a thorough review by the County Engi- neer. E. Overlay concept. (a) The Floodplain Areas described above shall be overlays to the existing underlying Zoning Districts as shown on the Official Zoning Map, and as such, the provisions for the floodplain areas shall serve as a supplement to the under- lying Zoning District provisions. (b) Where there happens to be any conflict between the provi- sions or requirements of any of the Floodplain Areas and those of any underlying Zoning District, the more restric- tive provisions shall apply. (c) In the event any provision concerning a Floodplain Area is declared inapplicable as a result of any legislative or administrative actions or judicial discretion, the basic underlying Zoning District provisions shall remain appli- cable. F. Flood boundary and floodway map. The boundaries of the Floodplain Areas are established as shown on the Flood Boundary and Floodway Map and Flood Insurance Rate Map which are declared to be a part of this chapter and which shall be kept on file in the office of the Zoning Administrator. G. Floodplain boundary changes and interpretation. (a) The delineation of any of the floodplain areas may be revised by the Board of Supervisors where natural or man- made changes have occurred and/or made detailed studies conducted or undertaken by the U.S. Army Corps of Engi- neers or other qualified agency, or an individual docu- ments the need for such change. However, prior to any such change, approval must be obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Federal Insurance Administra- tion. (b) Initial interpretations of the boundaries of the Flood- plain Areas shall be made by the Zoning Administrator. Should a dispute arise concerning the boundaries of any of the floodplain areas, the Board of Zoning Appeals shall make the necessary determination. The person questioning 2 or contesting the location of the floodplain area boundary shall be given an opportunity to present his case to the Board of Zoning Appeals and to submit technical evidence. H. Floodplain area provisions. All uses, activities, and development occurring within any flood- plain area shall be undertaken only upon the issuance of a zoning permit. Such development shall be undertaken only in strict com- pliance with the provisions of this section and with all other applicable codes and ordinances such as the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and the Roanoke County Subdivision Ordi- nance. Prior to the issuance of any such permit, the Zoning Administrator shall require all applications to include compli- ance with all applicable state and federal laws. Under no circumstances shall any use, activity, and/or develop- ment adversely affect the capacity of the channels or floodways of any watercourse, drainage ditch, or any other drainage facil- ity or system. Prior to any proposed alteration or relocation of any channels or floodways of any watercourse, stream, etc., within Roanoke County, approval shall be obtained from the State Water Control Board. Further notification of the proposal shall be given to all affected adjacent jurisdictions. Copies of such notification shall be forwarded to the State Water Control Board, the State Department of Intergovernmental Affairs, and the Federal Emer- gency Management Agency, Federal Insurance Administration. (a) All Floodplain Districts (1) Required Information For all permits the Zoning Administrator shall (i) obtain the elevation (in relation to mean sea level) of the lowest floor (including basement) of all new or substan- tially improved structures, and whether or not such struc- tures contain a basement, (ii) obtain, if the structure has been floodproofed, the elevation (in relation to mean sea level) to which the structure was floodproofed, and (iii) maintain a record of all such information. Where a non-residential structure is intended to be made water- tight below the base flood level, (i) a registered profes- sional engineer or architect shall develop and/or review structural design, specifications, and plans for the con- struction, and shall certify that the design and methods of construction are in accordance with accepted standards of practice for meeting the applicable provisions of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code, and (ii) a W record of such certificates which includes the specific elevation (in relation to mean sea level) to which such structures are flood -proofed shall be maintained by the Zoninq Administrator. (2) Zone A The Zoning Administrator shall obtain, review and reason- ably utilize any base flood elevation and floodway data available from a Federal, State, or other source, as cri- teria for requiring that new construction, substantial improvements, or other development in Zone A meets all standards noted in the Floodplain section of this ordi- nance. (3) Service Facilities Electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and air- conditioning equipment and other service facilities shall be designed and/or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during con- ditions of floodin (4) Manufactured Homes (5) All manufactured homes to be placed or substantially improved within any floodplain district shall be elevated on a permanent foundation such that the lowest floor of the manufactured home is at or above the base flood eleva- tion and shall be securely anchored to an adequately anchored foundation system in accordance with the provi- sions of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. This provision shall apply to existing manufactured home parks, subdivisions and lots where an existing manufac- tured home is replaced, any expansion to an existing park or subdivision and to new parks, subdivisions and instal- lations constructed after the effective date of this ordi- nance. Area Below Lowest Floor For all new construction and substantial improvements fully enclosed areas below the lowest floor that are subject to flooding shall be designed to automatically equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls by allowing for the entry and exit of floodwaters. Designs for meeting this requirement must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect or must meet or exceed the following minimum criteria: a minimum of two openings having a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to floodin4 shall be provided. The bottom of all openings may be no higher than one foot above grade. Openings may be equipped with screens, louvers, or other coverings or devices provided that thev permit the automatic entry and exit of floodwaters. (b) Floodway In the Floodway no development shall be permitted except where the effect of such development on flood heights is fully offset by ac:ompanying improvements which have been approved by all appropriate authorities as required above. The placement of any meb41emanufactured home, except in an existing meb41emanufactured home park or subdivi- sion, within the Floodway is specifically prohibited. (1) Permitted Uses In the Floodway the following uses and activities are permitted provided that they are in compliance with the provisions of the underlying Zoning District and are not prohibited by any other ordinance and provided that they do not require structures, fill, or storage of materials and equipment: (i) Agricultural uses such as general farming, pasture, grazing, outdoor plant nurseries, horticulture, truck farming, forestry, sod farming, and wild crop harvesting. (ii) Public and private recreational uses and activities such as parks, day camps, picnic grounds, golf courses, boat launching and swimming areas, hiking, and horseback riding trails, wildlife and nature preserves, game farms, fish hatcheries, trap and skeet game ranges, and hunting and fishing areas. (iii) Accessory residential uses such as yard areas, gardens, play areas, and loading areas. (iv) Accessory industrial and commercial uses such as yard areas, parking and loading areas, airport land- ing strips, etc. (2) Uses Permitted by Special Exception The following uses and activities may be permitted by Special Exception of the governing body following a public E hearing provided that they are in compliance with the provisions of the underlying Zoning' District and are not prohibited by this or any other ordinance: (i) Structures (except for mebilemanufactured homes) accessory to the uses and activities in (1) above. (ii) Certain utilities and public facilities and improve- ments such as pipe lines, water and sewage treatment plants, and other similar or related uses. (iii) Water -related uses and activities such as marinas, docks, wharves, piers, etc. (iv) Extraction of sand, gravel, and other materials (where no increase in level of flooding or velocity is caused thereby). (v) Storage of materials and equipment provided that they are not flammable or explosive, and are not subject to major damage by flooding, or provided that such material and equipment is firmly anchored to prevent flotation or movement, and/or can be read- ily removed from the area within the time available after flood warning. (vi) Other similar uses and activities provided they cause no increase in flood heights and/or velocities. All uses, activities, and structural development, shall be undertaken in strict compliance with the flood -proofing provisions contained in all appli- cable codes and ordinances. (c) Flood -Fringe and Approximated Floodplain In the Flood -Fringe and Approximated Floodplain the devel- opment and/or use of land shall be permitted in accordance with the regulations of the underlying Zoning District provided that all such uses, activities, and/or develop- ment shall be undertaken in strict compliance with the floodproofing and related provisions contained in the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and all other applicable codes and ordinances. However, in Approximated Floodplain areas the applicant and/or developer shall evaluate the effects of the pro- posed development and/or use of land on the floodplain with current hydrologic and hydraulic engineering tech- niques. The applicant and/or developer shall submit studies, analysis, computations, etc. to show the delinea- tion of a floodway based on the requirement that all exist- ing and future development not increase the 100- year 10 flood elevation more than one (1) foot at any point. The engineering principle, equal reduction of conveyance, shall be used to make the determination of increased flood height. I. Procedures for Special Exception in Floodways. (a) Any use listed as permitted with a Special Exception in a floodway shall be allowed only after application to the County Board of Supervisors. Such application shall include the following: (1) Plans in triplicate drawn to scale not less than 1" to 100' horizontally showing the location, dimensions, and contours (at 5 foot intervals) of the lot, existing and proposed structures, fill, storage areas, water supply, sanitary facilities, and* relationship of the floodway to the proposal. (2) A typical valley cross-section as necessary to adequately show the channel of the stream, elevation of land areas adjoining each side of the channel, cross-sectional areas to be occupied by the proposed development, and 100 -year flood elevation. (3) A profile showing the slope of the bottom of the channel or flow line of the stream. (4) A summary report, prepared by professional engineers or others of demonstrated qualifications, evaluating the pro- posed project in relation to flood heights and velocities; the seriousness of flood damage to the use; and other per- tinent technical matters. (5) A list of names and addresses of adjoining property owners. (b) The Board shall refer the complete application including technical evaluation to the Planning Commission. The Plan- ning Commission shall conduct such investigations as it deems necessary and shall conduct a public hearing under Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. (c) In acting upon such applications, the Planning Commission and the County Board of Supervisors shall consider all relevant factors specified in other sections of this chapter and: 11 (1) The danger to life and property due to increased flood heights or velocities caused by encroachments. No special exception shall be granted for any proposed use, develop- ment, or activity within the Floodway that will cause any increase in flood levels during the one hundred (100) year flood. (2) The danger that materials may be swept on to other lands or downstream to the injury of others. (3) The proposed water supply and sanitation systems and the ability of these systems to prevent disease, contamina- tion, and unsanitary conditions. (4) The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its con- tents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owners. (5) The importance of the services provided by the proposed facility to the County. (6) The requirements of the facility for a waterfront loca- tion. (7) The availability of alternative locations not subject to flooding for the proposed use. (8) The compatibility of the proposed use with existing devel- opment and development anticipated in the foreseeable future. (9) The relationship of the proposed use to the Comprehensive Plan and floodplain management program for the County. (10) The safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles. (11) Such other factors which are relevant to the purpose of this section. (d) The Board shall conduct a public hearing after receipt of a recommendation from the Planning Commission and render a decision. J. Variances. Variances may be granted for the reconstruction, rehabilitation, or restoration of structures listed on the National Register of Historic Places or a State Inventory of Historic Places without regard to the procedures set forth in this section. 12 Variances may not be considered within any Floodway if any in- crease in flood levels during the 100 -year flood would result. Variances may be considered for new construction and substantial improvements to be erected on a lot contiguous to and surrounded by lots with existing structures constructed below the 100 -year flood level using the guidelines set forth in Part I (c) of this section above. The Board of Zoning Appeals may refer any application and accompa- nying documentation pertaining to any request for a variance to any engineer or other qualified person or agency for technical assistance in evaluating the proposed project in relation to flood heights and velocities, and the adequacy of the plans for protection and other related matters. Variances shall only be issued after the Board of Zoning Appeals has determined that the granting of such will not result in (a) unacceptable or prohibited increases in flood heights, (b) addi- tional threats to public safety, (c) extraordinary public expense, (d) creation of nuisances (e) fraud or victimization of the public, or (f) conflict with local laws or ordinances. Variances shall only be issued after the Board of Zoning Appeals has determined that the variance will be the minimum relief to any hardship. The Board of Zoning Appeals shall notify the applicant for a vari- ance, in writing, that the issuance of a variance to construct a structure below the one hundred (100) year flood elevation (a) increases the risks to life and property, and (b) will result in increased premium rates for flood insurance. A record of the above notification as well as all variance actions, including justification for their issuance, shall be maintained and any variances which are issued shall be noted in the annual report submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Federal Insurance Administration. K. Existing structures in floodplain areas. A structure or use of a structure or premises which lawfully existed before the enactment of these provisions, but which is not in conformity with these provisions may be continued subject to the following conditions: (1) Existing structures and/or uses located in the floodway shall not be expanded or enlarged (unless the effect of the proposed expansion or enlargement on flood heights is fully offset by accompanying improvements). 13 (2) Any modification, alteration, repair, reconstruction, or improvement of any kind to a structure and/or use located in any floodplain to an extent or amount of less than fifty (50) percent of its market value, shall be evaluated and/or floodproofed in accordance with the Virginia Uni- form Statewide Building Code. (3) The modification, alteration, repair, reconstruction, or improvement of any kind to a structure and/or use regard- less of its location in a floodplain district to an extent or amount of fifty (50) percent or more of its market value shall be undertaken only in full compliance with the provisions of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. L. Liability. The degree of flood protection sought by the provisions of this section is considered reasonable for regulatory purposes and is based on acceptable engineering methods of study. Larger floods may occur on rare occasions. Flood heights may be increased by man-made or natural causes, such as ice jams and bridge openings restricted by debris. This section does not imply that areas outside floodplain areas, or that land uses permitted within such areas, will be free from flooding or flood damages. This ordinance shall not create liability on the part of Roanoke County or any officer or employee thereof for any flood damages that result from reliance on this ordinance or any administrative decision lawfully made thereunder. 2. The effective date of this ordinance shall be August 12, 1987. On motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk 8/13/87 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering 14 f Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning r Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Thomas M. Blaylock, Commonwealth's Attorney Magistrate Sheriff's Department Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Ave., Roanoke Main Libary Roanoke County Code Book 15 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 11, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. 81187-12 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for August 11, 1987, designated as Item L - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows: 1: Minutes of Meeting - July 14, 1987 2. Confirmation of Appointment to the Community Corrections Resources Board 3. Acceptance of a donation of a 25' x 20' lot to construct a booster pump station. 4. Approval of a Resolution of Support to bring the World Cup Soccer Matches to the United States 5. Request for increase in Youth Haven II Petty Cash Account. 6. Request for Acceptance into the Secondary System of the following roads: a. Huntridge Road, Springer Road, Britaney Road, Setter Road b. 0.03 miles of Burnham Road C. Summerset Drive, Summerset Circle and Branderwood Drive. d. 0.12 miles of Fernway Drive e. 0.06 miles of Sutherland Circle 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby directed and and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 8/13/87 cc: File Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering Bev Waldo, Youth Haven II Director John Peters, Assistant Director of Engineer Fred Anderson, County Treasurer AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 11, 1987 RESOLUTION 81187-12.c OF SUPPORT TO BRING THE 1994 WORLD CUP SOCCER GAMES TO THE UNITED STATES BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, Soccer is one of the world's most popular sports, and is the fastest growing team sport in the United States; and WHEREAS, The United States Soccer Federation is an organization supporting and promoting soccer at all levels; and WHEREAS, Soccer provides an excellent opportunity for our youth to develop team and individual athletic skills; and WHEREAS, the 1994 World Cup will be a major sporting and tourism event; and WHEREAS, World-wide interest in the 1994 World Cup will focus world attention and interest in our nation, and would greatly encourage the continued growth of soccer in the United States. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia declares its full support of the efforts of the United States Soccer Federation in bringing the 1994 World Cup to the United States, and offers it enthusiastic support to the United States Soccer Federation in all its actions before the Federation Internationale de Football Association, with the goal of bringing the 1994 World Cup to our nation; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County that a copy of this resolution be forwarded to The Virginia General Assembly and the Virginia Association of Counties requesting their support for this effort. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk 8/13/87 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Alfred Anderson, County Treasurer Virginia Association of Counties Virginia General Assembly U. S. Soccer Federation World Cup USA A -81187-12a ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 11, 1987 SUBJECT: Confirmation of Committee Appointments COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:' SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nomination must now be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. The nominee has agreed to serve. Community Corrections Resources Board Mr. Bernard. Hairston been nominated by Supervisor Alan Brittle to serve a one-year term. His term will expire August 13, 1988. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk APPROVED BY: e // Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Lee Garrett No Yes Abs Denied ( ) to approve Brittle _ X Received ( ) Garrett _X Referred Johnson — X To McGraw _ X Nickens X cc: File Committee File A -81187-12b lITEM NUMBER L -- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: August 11, 1987 SUBJECT: Acceptance of a donation of a 251x20' lot to construct a booster pump station. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: t SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Warren W. Grisso and Mavis R. Grisso have agreed to donate a 251x20' lot to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County in order for the County to construct a booster pump station to raise the low water pressure on Archer Drive. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 6987-9 , adopted on June 9, 1987, the Board authorized the County Administrator to accept donations or dedications of noncontroversial real estate matters. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider this acceptance by resolution under the consent agenda. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: �QAAM'W'� Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Elmer C. Hodge ------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved ( x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Lee No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Garrett to approve Brittle x Received ( ) Garrett x Referred Johnson x To McGraw x Nickens x cc: File Paul Mahoney Cliff Craig A -81187-12d ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 11, 1987 SUBJECT: Request for an Increase In the YOUTH HAVEN II Petty Cash Account COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On December 120 1986, the Board approved the establishment of a petty cash fund In the amount of $200 to cover residents' allowances and emergency purchases or reimbursements on a cash basis. Since that time, we have found that we also have to draw money for our recreational activities from our petty cash fund. The reason for this is that we cannot obtain an advance check from our recreation budget because we do not know the exact amount to be spent or have a receipt for the expenditure before engaging in the activity. Therefore,.) am requesting that our petty cash fund be increased to $300. This additional $100 will be charged back to our recreation account and allow a sufficient cash flow to cover these activities. FISCAL -IMPACT- IMPACT: None— RECOMMENDATION- NoneRECOMMENDATION- -Staff -Staff recommends an increase in the amount of the YOUTH HAVEN II petty _ cash fund from $200 to $300. This change requires a specific action of the Board of Supervisors and is audited annually by our independent auditors. SUBMITTED BY: T, &Pal4 �41 everly T. Waldo, MSW Program Manager, YOUTH HAVEN II APPROVED BY: gel Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Lee No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Garrett to approve BrittleX Received ( ) Garrett X Referred To cc: File—, Reta Busher, Bev Waldo Johnson x McGraw __ Nickens X AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 11, 1987 RESOLUTION 81187-12.e REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF HUNTRIDGE ROAD, SPRINGER ROAD, BRITANEY ROAD AND SETTER ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Huntridge Road, Springer Road, Britaney Road and Setter Road to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty ( 50 ) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore deed dedicated by virtue of a certain map/maps known as Huntridge Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 200, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on August 17, 1981 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said road known as Huntridge Road, Springer Road, Britaney Road and Setter Road and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and i after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 8/13/87 cc: File John A. Peters, Assistant Director of Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Arnold Covey, Director of Development Review Va. Department of Transportation AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 11, 1987 RESOLUTION 81187-12.f REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF BURNHAM ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Burnham Road to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore deed dedicated by virtue of a certain map/maps known as Castle Rock West, Section 3 Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 319, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on April 15, 1985 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said road known as Burnham Road and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: MaKy H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 8/13/87 cc: File John A. Peters, Assistant Director of Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Arnold Covey, Director of Development Review Va. Department of Transportation AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 11, 1987 RESOLUTION 81187-12.g REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF SUMMERSET CIRCLE AND BRANDERWOOD DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke Cou,nty, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Summerset Drive, Summerset Circle and Branderwood Drive to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore deed dedicated by virtue of a certain map/maps known as Branderwood, Sections 1, 2 and 3 Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Books 9 and 10, Pages 351, 5 and 19, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on December 4, 1985, May 7, 1986 and July 31, 1986 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said road known as Summerset Drive , Summerset Circle and Branderwood Drive and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: lv' Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk 8/13/87 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File John A. Peters, Assistant Director of Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Arnold Covey, Director of Development Review Va. Department of Transportation AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 11, 1987 RESOLUTION 81187-12.h REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF FERNWAY DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: I 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Fernway Drive to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore deed dedicated by virtue of a certain map/maps known as Carriage Hills, Section 3 Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 1, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on March 6, 1986 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said road known as Fernway Drive and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. I On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: f 222e-4: ' /_ _ � Mary. H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 8/13/87 cc: File John A. Peters, Assistant Director of Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Arnold Covey, Director of Development Review Va. Department of Transportation AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 11, 1987 RESOLUTION 81187-12.i REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF SUTHERLAND CIRCLE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the BOctrd of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Sutherland Circle to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty ( 50 ) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore deed dedicated by virtue of a certain map/maps known as Campbell Hills, Section 3 Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 179, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on November 18, 1980 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said road known as Sutherland Circle and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. - On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 8/13/87 cc: File John A. Peters, Assistant Director of Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Arnold Covey, Director of Development Review Va. Department of Transportation