Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2/23/1988 - Adopted Board RecordsA-22388-1 ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 23, 1988 SUBJECT: Drainage Work Session COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is the detailed report for the drainage work session. The staff will be making a presentation to the Board and will provide an overview of the report. The work session will consist of: 1. Maintenance responsibility; 2. Drainage maintenance projects; 3. Major problem areas; 4. Recommendations. Please review the report and if you need additional informa- tion, please contact Phillip Henry so that it can be made avail- able at the work session. SUBMITTED BY: ZQ Jo n R./Hubbard-,-P.E. Assistant County Administrator of Public Facilities APPROVED: Elmer C. Nodge County Administrator cc: File Phil Henry John Hubbard ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ No Yes Abs Denied ( )Steven A. McGraw to adopt maint- Garrett x Received ( )enance philosophy, the list of Johnson x Referred prioritized projects and the use McGraw x to of non-violent offenders in the Nickens x project. Robers x cc: File Phil Henry John Hubbard AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988 RESOLUTION 22388-2 REQUESTING FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) TO COMPLETE A RESTUDY OF BARNHARDT CREEK BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein. 2. That the Flood Insurance Study for Roanoke County, Virginia with an effective date of October 17, 1978 has been adopted and used by the Roanoke County government. 3. That the Flood Insurance Study was revised on December 4, 1985 to reflect errors in field data along portions of Barnhardt Creek. 4. That there is evidence to indicate that the field data along the full section of Barnhardt Creek, being that portion within Roanoke County, Virginia is in error and that a restudy is necessary to have correct information concerning the 100 year flood plain, and other related flood data. 5. That the restudy is important to various property owners within the County and the restudy could result in the elimination of unnecessary hardship to these property owners, there is a need to proceed expeditiously with this study. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None 2/24/88 cc: File Phillip Henry John Hubbard, A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Director of Engineering Assistant County Administrator A-22388-3 ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: February 23, 1988 SUBJECT: Elimination of Ridership Fees for the CORTRAN Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Beginning July 1, 1987, the Board of Supervisors approved the continuation of the CORTRAN program which provides transportation services to the elderly and handicapped residents of Roanoke County through cooperative efforts with RADAR. The 1987-88 budget included $60,000 for the cost of operations which consists mainly of charges billed to the County by RADAR based upon the County ridership. Currently, the County is charging $1.50 per ride. In order to distribute these tickets to the remote selling locations or directly sell these tickets through the County offices, it is currently taking 16 to 18 hours per week of County staff time. This time was not figured into the original $60,000 that was allotted for the CORTRAN program. There is also an additional expense for the printing of these tickets. The revenues that the County realizes from these sales is fairly small. The budget estimated $14,400 for ticket sales. As of January 31, 1988, only $3,734 has been collected. The County staff believes that the CORTRAN program is providing a very necessary service to the elderly and handicapped residents of Roanoke County. However, it does not appear to be cost effective to sell tickets for this service. Therefore, we would suggest that beginning April 1, 1988, the ridership fee for CORTRAN be eliminated. We have discussed this recommendation with Curtis Andrews of RADAR who sees no problem with the elimination of this fee. The citizens may present their League of Older Americans card (for the elderly) or their Easter Seals card (for the handicapped), rather than giving the bus drivers a ticket. With the elimination of the need for the expenses related to ticket sales, the CORTRAN budget for the 1988-89 fiscal year will remain constant at $60,000. FISCAL IMPACT: The removal of CORTRAN ticket fees would save the County money. The loss in ticket revenues would be more than offset by savings in County staff time and printing costs. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the elimination of ridership fees for the CORTRAN program. SUBMITTED BY: Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance APPROVED: f Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Steven A. McGraw to approve Garrett x Received ( ) recommendation Johnson x Referred McGraw x To Nickens x Robers x cc: File Diane Hyatt John Chambliss AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988 RESOLUTION 22388-4 OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF ITS $4,700,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND, SERIES 1988A, AND SETTING FORTH THE FORM AND DETAILS THEREOF A majority of the voters of the County of Roanoke, Vir- ginia ("County"), at an election held on November 5, 1974 ("1974 Election"), approved the issuance of general obligation bonds of the County in an amount not to exceed $8,700,000 to finance the cost of sanitary sewer facilities to be part of a County -wide sanitary sewer system, including the acquisition of sanitary sewer system, including the acquisition of sanitary sewer facili- ties owned by the Roanoke County Public Service Authority, the acquisition and construction of additions thereto and the recon- struction and extension thereof ("1974 Sewer Project"). The voters at the 1974 Election also approved the issuance of general obligation bonds of the County in an amount not to exceed $6,100,000 to finance the cost of water facilities to be part of a County -wide water supply treatment and distribution system, including the acquisition of water facilities owned by the Roanoke County Public Service Authority, the acquisition and con- struction of additions thereto and the reconstruction and exten- sion thereof ("1974 Water Project"). On December 30, 1974, the Circuit Court of the County entered an order authorizing the Board of Supervisors of the County ("Board") to carry out the wishes of the voters as expressed at the 1974 Election. On March 15, 1977, the County issued its $4,500,000 Water Improvement Bonds ("1977 Bonds") pursuant to a resolution of the Board adopted January 25, 1977. On or about September 1, 1980, the County issued its $8,500,000 Public Improvement Bonds ("1980 Bonds") pursuant to a resolution of the Board adopted July 22, 1980. On or about November 1, 1982, the County issued its $10,000,000 Public Improvement Bonds ("1982 Bonds") pursuant to a resolution of the Board adopted September 28, 1982. The County used all $4,500,000 of the proceeds of the 1974 Bonds and $1,600,000 of the proceeds of 1980 Water Bonds for the 1974 Water Project. The County used $2,000,000 of the proceeds of the 1980 Bonds and $3,000,000 of the proceeds of the 1982 Bonds for the 1974 Sewer Project. The 1977 Bonds, the 1980 Bonds, and the 1982 Bonds constitute the only bonds of the County attributable to the general obligation bonds approved at the 1974 Election. A majority of the voters of the County at an election held November 4, 1986 ("1986 Election"), approved the issuance of general obligation bonds of the County in an amount not to exceed $16,000,000 for the purpose of paying all or a portion of the costs of acquiring, constructing, developing and equipping a pub- lic water supply and related facilities including a dam and a reservoir ("1986 Water Project"). On November 19, 1986, the Cir- cuit Court of the County entered an order authorizing the Board to carry out the wishes of the voters expressed at the 1986 Election. The Board has determined that it is advisable to cause the County to borrow $4,700,000 from the Virginia Resources Autho- rity ("Authority") to finance the cost of certain improvements to 2 the County's water and sewer systems more particularly described in Exhibit B to the Financing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 1988 ("Financing Agreement"), between the Authority and the County. The County will contract a debt and issue its General Obligation Bon6, Series 1988 ("Local Bond"), in the original prin- cipal amount of $4,700,000, and sell the Local Bond to the Autho- rity to evidence the loan. $3,700,000 of the proceeds of the Local Bond will be used for the 1974 Sewer Project and $1,000,000 of such proceeds will be used for the 1986 Water Project. The foregoing arrangements are reflected in the follow- ing documents, forms of which have been presented to this meeting and filed with the County's documents: (1) Financing Agreement, together with a form of the Local Bond attached thereto, and (2) Preliminary Reoffering Statement, dated February 9, 1988 ("Prelim- inary Reoffering Statement"). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that: 1. Authorization of Bond. The issuance of a general obligation bond of the County to be known as the County of Roanoke, Virginia, General Obligation Bond, Series 1988A, is auth- orized. The Local Bond shall be issued in the original principal amount of $4,700,000 and sold to the Authority for the purchase price set forth in the Financing Agreement, which purchase price is hereby determined to be in the best interests of the Common- wealth of Virginia and the County. 2. Authorization of Financing Agreement. The Financ- ing Agreement is approved. The Chairman of the County's Board of 3 Supervisors ("Chairman") is authorized to execute on behalf of the County the Financing Agreement in substantially the form sub- mitted to this meeting, with such changes, insertions or omis- sions as may be approved by the Chairman, whose approval shall be evidenced conclusively by the execution and delivery thereof. The Chairman, the Clerk of the County's Board of Supervisors ("Clerk"), the Treasurer of the County ("Treasurer"), the County Administrator, the Assistant County Administrator - Management Services ("Assistant County Administrator") and the Director of Utilities of the County ("Director") are each authorized to exe- cute and deliver on behalf of the County such other instruments, documents or c rtificates, and to do and perform such things and acts, as they shall deem necessary or appropriate to carry out the transactions authorized by this Resolution or contemplated by the Local Bond or the Financing Agreement, and all of the fore- going, previously done or performed by the Chairman, the Clerk, the Treasurer, the County Administrator, the Assistant County Administrator or the Director, are in all respects approved, rati- fied and confirmed. 3. Details of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be issued as a fully registered bond without coupons in the denomina- tion of $4,700,.000 and shall be dated March 1, 1988. The Local Bond shall bear interest at the rates indicated below, and the principal amount thereof shall be payable, subject to prior re- demption, on November 1 in each of the years and in the payment amounts set forth below: 4 Principal Principal Payment Payment Interest Amount Due Date Rate $ 95,000 November 1, 1988 4.50 120,000 November 1, 1989 5.0 130,000 November 1, 1990 5.2 135,000 November 1, 1991 5.4 140,000 November 1, 1992 5.6 150,000 November 1, 1993 5.8 160,000 November 1., 1994 6.0 170,000 November 1, 1995 6.2 180,000 November 1, 1996 6.35 190,000 November 1, 1997 6.5 205,000 November 1, 1998 6.65 2151000 November 1, 1999 6.8 230,000 November 1, 2000 6.9 250,000 November 1, 2001 7.0 265,000 November 1, 2002 7.1 285,000 November 1, 2003 7.2 305,000 November 1, 2004 7.3 330,000 November 1, 2005 7.35 355,000 November 1, 2006 7.4 380,000 November 1, 2007 7.45 410,000 November 1, 2008 7.5 Each principal installment of the Local Bond shall bear interest at its respective interest rate from the date of the Local Bond until such principal payment amount is paid. In addi- tion, the County shall pay a late payment charge as provided in the Financing Agreement if any payment of principal or interest is not received within five days of its due date. Interest on the Local Bond shall be computed on the basis of a year of 360 days and twelve 30 -day months. The principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Local Bond shall be payable at the place and in the manner provided in the Financing Agreement. The prin- cipal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Local Bond shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America. 4. Pledge of Full Faith and Credit. The full faith and credit of the County are hereby irrevocably pledged to the 5 payment of the principal of and interest on the Local Bond as the same shall become due, and each year while any portion of the Local Bond remains outstanding and unpaid, unless other funds are lawfully available and appropriated for the timely payment there- of, there shall be levied, without limitation as to rate or amount, and collected in accordance with law, an annual ad valorem tax on all taxable property in the County subject to local taxation sufficient to provide for the timely payment of the Local Bond and interest thereon as the same shall become due. 5. Prepayment of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall. be subject to prepayment as set forth in the Financing Agreement. 6. Acceleration of Local Bond. If an Event of Default (as defined in the Financing Agreement) shall have occurred and be continuing, the principal amount of and accrued interest on the Local Bond may be declared immediately due and payable by written notice to the County. 7. Execution of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be signed by the manual or facsimile signature of the Chairman and Treasurer of the County, and the corporate seal of the County or a facsimile of such seal shall be affixed thereon and shall be attested by the manual or facsimile signature of the Clerk. In case any officer whose signature shall appear on the Local Bond shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of the Local Bond, such signature shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes the same as if he or she had remained in office until such delivery. The Local Bond may be signed by such per- sons as at the actual time of the execution thereof shall be the D proper officers to sign such Local Bond although at the date of delivery of such Local Bond such persons may not have been such officers. 8. r'orm of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be sub- stantially in the form attached as Exhibit A to the Financing Agreement, with such appropriate variations, omissions and inser- tions as permitted or required by this Resolution or the Financ- ing Agreement. There may be endorsed on the Local Bond such leg- end or text as may be necessary or appropriate to conform to any applicable rules and regulations of any governmental authority or any usage or requirement of law with respect thereto. 9. Registration, Transfer and Exchange. The County hereby appoints the Clerk as its registrar and transfer agent to keep books for the registration and transfer of the Local Bond and to make such registrations and transfers under such reason- able regulations as the County may prescribe. Upon surrender for transfer or exchange of the Local Bond at the office of the Clerk, the County shall execute and deliver in the name of the transferee or transferees a new Local Bond or Bonds for a principal amount equal to the Local Bond sur- rendered and of the same form and maturity and bearing interest at the same rate as the Local Bond surrendered, subject in each case to such reasonable regulations as the County may prescribe. If presented for transfer, exchange, redemption or payment, the Local Bond shall be accompanied by a written instrument or instru- ments of transrer or authorization for exchange, in form and sub- stance reasonably satisfactory to the County, duly executed by 7 the registered owner or by his or her duly authorized attorney-in- fact or legal representative. The Local Bond may not be regis- tered to bearer. A new Local Bond delivered upon any transfer or ex- change shall be a valid obligation of the County, evidencing the same debt as the Local Bond surrendered, shall be secured by this Resolution and the Financing Agreement and entitled to all of the security and benefits hereof to the same extent as the Local Bond surrendered. 10. Charges for Exchange or Transfer. No charge shall be made for any exchange or transfer of the Local Bond, but the County may require payment by the holder of the Local Bond of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge that may be imposed in relation thereto. 11. Temporary Typewritten Local Bond. The County may initially issue the Local Bond in typewritten form. If the Local Bond is issued in typewritten form, upon the written request of the registered owner of the Local Bond and upon surrender of the Local Bond in typewritten form, the County shall promptly pre- pare, execute and deliver to such registered owner a Local Bond in printed form of the same maturity and interest rate and for the same principal amount as the typewritten Local Bond. Appro- priate variations, omissions and insertions may be made in the Local Bond to facilitate printing. 12. Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroved Local Bond. If the Local Bond has been mutilated, lost, stolen or destroyed, the County shall execute and deliver, a new Local Bond of like date and tenor in exchange and substitution for, and upon deliv- ery to the County and cancellation of, such mutilated Local Bond, or in lieu of and in substitution for such lost, stolen or destroyed Local Bond; provided, however, that the County shall execute, authenticate and deliver a new Local Bond only if the registered own^r thereof has paid the reasonable expenses and charges of the County in connection therewith and, in the case of a lost, stolen or destroyed Local Bond (i) has filed with the County evidence satisfactory to it that such Local Bond was lost, stolen or destroyed and that the holder of the Local Bond was the registered owner thereof and (ii) has furnished to the County indemnity satisfactory to it. If the Local Bond has matured, instead of issuing a new Local Bond, the County may pay the same without surrender thereof upon receipt of the aforesaid evidence and indemnity. 13. Freliminary Reoffering Statement. The inclusion of the information with respect to the County contained in the sec- tion "Roanoke County" in the Preliminary Reoffering Statement, prepared in connection with the reoffering and sale of the Corre- sponding Bonds (as defined in the Financing Agreement), is hereby ratified and confirmed and the use of such information in final form in the Reoffering Statement of the Authority is hereby autho- rized and approved; provided, however, such information contained in the Reoffering Statement shall be reviewed and approved by the Assistant County Administrator before the distribution of the Reoffering Statement. 9 14. Filing of Resolution. The Chairman and the Clerk are each hereby authorized and directed to file or cause to be filed a certified copy of this Resolution with the Circuit Court of Roanoke County pursuant to Sections 15.1-189, 15.1-199 and 15.1-212 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. 15. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Robers, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk 2/24/88 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Alfred C. Anderson, County Treasurer Clifford Craig, Director of Utility McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, County Bond Counsel Clerk of Circuit Court of Roanoke County AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988 RESOLUTION 22388-5 OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF ITS $960,000 WATER SYSTEM REVENUE BOND, SERIES 1988A, AND SETTING FORTH THE FORM AND DETAILS THEREOF The County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County"), a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, has applied for and has received approval for a loan of $960,000 from the Virginia Resources Authority ("Authority") to finance extensions of the County's existing water system. The County will issue its Water System Revenue Bond, Series 1988A ("Local Bond"), in the original principal amount of $960,000, and sell the Local Bond to the Au- thority to evidence the County's obligation to repay the loan. The foregoing arrangements are reflected in the follow- ing documents, forms of which have been presented to this meeting and filed with the County's documents: (1) Financing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 1988 ("Financing Agreement"), between the Authority and the County, together with a form of the Local Bond attached thereto, and (2) Preliminary Reoffering Statement, dated February 9, 1988 ("Preliminary Reoffering Statement"). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that: 1. Definitions. Unless otherwise defined, all capital- ized terms used in this Resolution shall have the meanings set forth in the Financing Agreement. 1 2. Authorization of Bond. The issuance of a revenue bond of the County to be known as the County of Roanoke, Virgin- ia, Water System Revenue Bond, Series 1988A, is authorized. The Local Bond shall be issued in the original principal amount of $960,000 and sold to the Authority for the purchase price set forth in the Financing Agreement, which purchase price is hereby determined to be in the best interests of the Commonwealth of Virginia and the County. 3. Authorization of Financinq Aqreement. The Finan- cing Agreement is approved. The Chairman of the County's Board of Supervisors ("Chairman") is authorized to execute on behalf of the County the Financing Agreement in substantially the form sub- mitted to this meeting, with such changes, insertions or omis- sions as may be approved by the Chairman, whose approval shall be evidenced conclusively by the execution and delivery thereof. The Chairman, the Clerk of the County's Board of Supervisors ("Clerk"), the Treasurer of the County ("Treasurer"), the County Administrator, the Assistant County Administrator - Management Services ("Assistant County Administrator") and the Director of Utilities of the County ("Director") are each authorized to exe- cute and deliver on behalf of the County such other instruments, documents or certificates, and to do and perform such things and acts, as they shall deem necessary or appropriate to carry out the transactions authorized by this Resolution or contemplated by the Local Bond or the Financing Agreement, and all of the fore- going, previously done or performed by the Chairman, the Clerk, the Treasurer, the County Administrator, the Assistant County 2 Administrator or the Director, are in all respects approved, rat- ified and confirmed. 4. Details of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be issued as a fully registered bond without coupons in the denomina- tion of $960,000 and shall be dated March 1, 1988. The Local Bond shall bear interest at the rates indicated below, and the principal amount thereof shall be payable, subject to prior re- demption, on November 1 in each of the years and in the payment amounts set forth below: Principal Principal Payment Payment Interest Amount Date Rate $20,000 _Due November 1, 1988 4.5% 25,000 November 1, 1989 5.0 25,000 November 1, 1990 5.2 25,000 November 1, 1991 5.4 30,000 November 1, 1992 5.6 30,000 November 1, 1993 5.8 35,000 November 1, 1994 6.0 35,000 November 1, 1995 6.2 35,000 November 11 1996 6.35 40,000 November 11 1997 6.5 40,000 November 1, 1998 6.65 45,000 November 1, 1999 6,8 45,000 November 1, 2000 6.9 50,000 November 1, 2001 7.0 55,000 November 1, 2002 7.1 60,000 November 1, 2003 7.2 65,000 November 11 2004 7.3 65,000 November 1, 2005 7.35 70,000 November 1, 2006 7.4 80,000 November 11 2007 7.45 85,000 November 11 2008 7.5 Each principal installment of the Local Bond shall bear interest at its respective interest rate from the date of the Local Bond until such principal payment amount is paid. In addi- tion, the County shall pay a late payment charge as provided in the Financing Agreement if any payment of principal or interest 3 is not received within five days of its due date. Interest on the Local Bond shall be computed on the basis of a year of 360 days and twelve 30 -day months. The principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Local Bond shall be payable at the place and in the manner provided in the Financing Agreement. Subject to the right of the County to apply Revenues to the payment of Operation and Maintenance Expense and to the provi- sions of the Financing Agreement, the Revenues are hereby pledged to secure the payment of the principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Local Bond and the performance of the County's obligations under the Financing Agreement. The principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Local Bond shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America only from the Revenues and other sources pledged to the payment thereof as provided in this Resolution and the Financing Agreement. 5. Prepayment of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be subject to prepayment as set forth in the Financing Agreement. 6. Acceleration of Local Bond. If an Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing, the principal amount of and accrued interest on the Local Bond may be declared immediate- ly due and payable by written notice to the County. 7. Execution of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be signed by the manual or facsimile signature of the Chairman and the Treasurer, and the corporate seal of the County or a facsim- ile of such seal shall be affixed thereon and shall be attested by the manual or facsimile signature of the Clerk. In case any 4 officer whose signature shall appear on the Local Bond shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of the Local Bond, such signature shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes the same as if he or she had remained in office until such delivery. The Local Bond may be signed by such persons as at the actual time of the execution thereof shall be the proper officers to sign such Local Bond although at the date of delivery of such Local Bond such persons may not have been such officers. 8. Form of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be sub- stantially in the form attached as Exhibit A to the Financing Agreement, with such appropriate variations, omissions and inser- tions as permitted or required by this Resolution or the Finan- cing Agreement. There may be endorsed on the Local Bond such legend or text as may be necessary or appropriate to conform to any applicable rules and regulations of any governmental autho- rity or any usage or requirement of law with respect thereto. 9. Registration, Transfer and Exchange. The County hereby appoints the Clerk as its registrar and transfer agent to keep books for the registration and transfer of the Local Bond and to make such registration and transfers under such reasonable regulations as the County may prescribe. Upon surrender for transfer or exchange of the Local Bond at the office of the Clerk, the County shall execute and deliver in the name of the transferee or transferees a new Local. Bond or Bonds for a principal amount equal to the Local Bond sur- rendered and of the same form and maturity and bearing interest at the same rate as the Local Bond surrendered, subject in each 5 case to such reasonable regulations as the County may prescribe. If presented for transfer, exchange, redemption or payment, the Local Bond shall be accompanied by a written instrument or instru- ments of transfer or authorization for exchange, in form and sub- stance reasonably satisfactory to the County, duly executed by the registered owner or by his or her duly authorized attorney-in- fact or legal representative. The Local Bond may not be regis- tered to bearer. A new Local Bond delivered upon any transfer or ex- change shall be a valid obligation of the County, evidencing the same debt as the Local Bond surrendered, shall be secured by this Resolution and the Financing Agreement and entitled to all of the security and benefits hereof to the same extent as the Local Bond surrendered. 10. Charges for Exchange or Transfer. No charge shall be made for any exchange or transfer of the Local Bond, but the County may require payment by the holder of the Local Bond of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge that may be imposed in relation thereto. 11. Temporary Typewritten Local Bond. The County may initially issue the Local Bond in typewritten form. If the Local Bond is issued in typewritten form, upon the written request of the registered owner of the Local Bond and upon surrender of the Local Bond in typewritten form, the County shall promptly pre- pare, execute and deliver to such registered owner a Local Bond in printed form of the same maturity and interest rate and for the same principal amount as the typewritten Local Bond. Appro- G priate variations, omissions and insertions may be made in the Local. Bond to facilitate printing. 12. Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Local Bond. If the Local Bond has been mutilated, lost, stolen or destroyed, the County shall execute and deliver a new Local Bond of like date and tenor in exchange and substitution for, and upon deliv- ery to the County and cancellation of, such mutilated Local Bond, or in lieu of and in substitution for such lost, stolen or de- stroyed Local Bond; provided, however, that the County shall exe- cute, authenticate and deliver a new Local Bond only if the regis- tered owner thereof has paid the reasonable expenses and charges of the County in connection therewith and, in the case of a lost, stolen or destroyed Local Bond (i) has filed with the County evi- dence satisfactory to it that such Local Bond was lost, stolen or destroyed and that the holder of the Local Bond was the regis- tered owner thereof and (ii) has furnished to the County indem- nity satisfactory to it. If the Local Bond has matured, instead of issuing a new Local Bond, the County may pay the same without surrender thereof upon receipt of the aforesaid evidence and in- demnity. 13. Preliminary Reoffering Statement. The inclusion of the information with respect to the County contained in the section "Roanoke County" in the Preliminary Reoffering Statement, prepared in connection with the reoffering and sale of the Corre- sponding Bonds (as defined in the Financing Agreement), is hereby ratified and confirmed and the use of such information in final 7 form in the Reoffering Statement of the Authority is hereby autho- rized and approved; provided, however, such information contained in the Reoffering Statement shall be reviewed and approved by the Assistant County Administrator before the distribution of the Reoffering Statement. 14. Filinq of Resolution; Notice. The Chairman and the Clerk are each hereby authorized and directed to file or cause to be filed a certified copy of this Resolution with the Circuit Court of Roanoke County pursuant to Sections 15.1-199 and 15.1-212 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and within ten days thereafter to publish once in a newspaper of general circulation in the County a notice setting forth (1) in brief and general terms the purpose for which the Local Bond is to be issued and (2) the principal amount of the Local Bond. 15. Conflicting Resolutions. All parts of resolutions of the Board which are in conflict with this Resolution are here- by rescinded and repealed. 16. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. On motion of Supervisor Robers, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 2/24/88 cc: File John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Alfred C. Anderson, County Treasurer Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, County Bond Counsel Clerk of Circuit Court of Roanoke County Oj AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988 RESOLUTION 22388-6 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA. REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTES IN THE AMOUNT OF UP TO $8,000,000 AND APPROVING THE FORM AND DETAILS THEREOF WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County") has determined that it is necessary and expedient to borrow $8,000,000 and to issue its revenue anticipation notes in an amount not to exceed $8,000,000 (the "Notes") to meet casual cash flow deficits of the County; and WHEREAS, the County desires to specify the form and details of the Notes and authorize the County Administrator to solicit bids from a limited number of potential investors for the purchase of such Notes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The Board of the County determines that it is advis- able to contract a debt and issue and sell the Notes in an aggre- gate principal amount of $8,000,000. The issuance and sale of the Notes are authorized. The proceeds from the sale of the Notes shall be used to meet casual cash flow deficits of the County. 2. The Notes shall be issued in bearer form, without privilege of registration and without coupons, in substantially the form attached as Exhibit A. The Notes shall be dated March 14, 1988; shall be issued in denominations of $25,000; shall be numbered N-1 and upward, sequentially; shall bear inter- est at a rate to be set by a subsequent resolution of this Board payable at maturity; and shall mature on June 13, 1988. The Notes shall not be subject to payment or redemption before matu- rity. 3. The full faith and credit of the County are pledged to the paymen' at maturity of the principal of and interest on the Notes. Unless other funds are lawfully available and appro- priated for the timely payment of the Bonds, there shall be levied, withou� limitation as to rate or amount, and collected in accordance with law, an annual ad valorem tax on all taxable pro- perty in the County subject to local taxation sufficient to pro- vide for payment of the principal of and interest on the Notes at maturity. 4. The County Administrator and Treasurer of the County are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Notes, and the Treasurer is hereby authorized to affix or imprint the seal of the County on the Notes. The form of execution, imprint- ing of the seal and attestation may be by facsimile; provided, however, if the signatures of the County Administrator and Trea- surer are both by facsimile, the Notes shall not be valid until authenticated by the manual signature of the Paying Agent. In case any officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signa- ture shall appear on any Note shall cease to be such officer be- fore the delivery of the Notes, such signature or such facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes the same as if he or she had remained in office until such delivery. 2 Any Note may bear the facsimile signature of or may be signed by such persons as at the actual time of its execution are the pro- per officers to sign such Note although at the date of delivery of such Note such persons may not have been such officers. Upon receipt of payment therefor, the Treasurer of the County or such agent as may be designated, shall issue and deliver the Notes to the purchaser or purchasers thereof. The officers and agents of the County are further authorized and directed to do all acts required by the Notes and by this Resolution for the full, punc- tual and complete performance of all things necessary for this borrowing. 5. Crestar Bank is appointed as Paying Agent for the Notes. The principal of and interest on the Notes shall be pay- able in lawful money of the United States upon surrender of the Notes on the maturity date at the principal corporate trust office of the Paying Agent in Richmond, Virginia. 6. The Board agrees on behalf of the County that the proceeds frim the issuance and sale of the Notes will be invested and expended as set forth in the Non -Arbitrage Certificate of the County to be delivered at the time of the issuance and delivery of the Notes and that the County will comply with the covenants and representations contained therein. Further, the County shall comply with the reporting requirements of Section 149(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. 7. The officers and advisors of the County are autho- rized to solicit from a limited number of sophisticated investors bids to purchase the Notes. 3 8. The officers and agents of the County are autho- rized and directed to take such further action as may be neces- sary or convenient in connection with the issuance, sale and de- livery of the Notes and all actions previously taken by such offi- cers and agents in connection therewith are ratified and con- firmed. 9. The appropriate officers and agents of the County are authorized and directed to immediately cause a certified copy of this Resolution, setting forth the form and details of the Notes, to be filed with the Circuit Court of the County pursuant to Section 15.1-199 and 15.1-212 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and the notice required by Section 15.1-199 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, to be published. 10. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 2/24/88 cc: File John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Alfred C. Anderson, County Treasurer Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance Reta Busher, Director of Management and Budget Paul Mahoney, County Attorney AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988 RESOLUTION NO. 22388-7 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for February 23, 1988, designated as Item I - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 9, inclusive, as follows: 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Grievance Panel and Transportation and Safety Commission. 2. Notification from the Virginia Department of Transportation that the 0.49 miles of Route 1950 (Forest Edge Drive has been accepted into the Secondary System. 3. Request for acceptance of Hill Drive, Airpoint Drive and Airpoint Road into the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System. 4. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Hollins -Plantation Shopping Center. 5. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Meadow Creek, Section 3. 6. Acceptance of Old Manor Drive and Old Manor Court, Plantation Estates into the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System. 7. Apprcval of a Raffle Permit for the Botetourt Jaycees. 8. Resolution from the Planning Commission recommending approval of acquisition of 5.1779 acre tract for fire and rescue facilities in the Back Creek community planning area. 9. Approval to close out Va. Division of Historic Landmarks grant for roof replacement on the Old County Courthouse 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Garrett after removing Item 1 for admendment and discussion, seconded by Supervisor Robers, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None Supervisor Garrett advised that Item 1 should be amended to reflect that Eugene Martin is replacing Joe Himes on the Grievance Panel. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve Item 1. seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: SupervisorsJohnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk 2/24/88 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance John Hubbard, Assistant County Administartor Timothy Gubala, Assistant County Administrator A IT -22388-7 . a ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE February 23, 1988 SUBJECT: Confirmation of Committee Appointments COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nominations were made at the previous board meeting and must now be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. The nominee has agreed to serve. Grievance Panel: Supervisor Garrett nominated Eugene M. Martin to serve the unexpired two-year term of Richard Robers. The term will expire September 27, 1989. Transportation and Safety Commission Supervisor Nickens nominated Leo Trenor and Mrs. May Johnson to serve another term as citizens at large, and Charlotte Lichtenstein, representing neighborhood organizations. These are four-year terms and will expire January 1, 1992. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk APPROVED BY: Y Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Harry C. Denied ( ) Nickens after amen inga ugene Received Martin tills Joe Himes term w is Referred expires To cc: File Committee File Abs VOTE No Yes Brittle x Garrett x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens —� Abs A -22388-7.b ITEM NUMBER --.Z AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 23, 1988 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Forest Edge Drive (Route 1950) in the VDOT Secondary System COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On December 15, 1987 the Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution requesting that the Department of Transportation accept 0.49 miles of Forest Edge Drive (Route 1950) into the Secondary System. Oscar K. Mabry, Deputy Commissioner of the Department of Transportation has now informed us that this addition is approved, effective January 26, 1988 SUBMITTED BY: G2 �irL� Jd . Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk APPROVED BY: 6 1� /9 Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Lee Garrett/Richard No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Robers Garrett -x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred McGraw To Nickens x— Robers x cc: File Phil Henry John Hubbard AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988 A M E N D E D RESOLUTION 22388-7.c REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF HILL DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Resolution 6987-12.f requesting acceptance of Hill Drive into the VDOT Secondary Road System is hereby rescinded. 2. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings therein and upon the application for Hill Drive, a section of road extending from Glade Creek Drive (Route 636), 0.79 miles east of Bonsack Road (Route 603) and extending in a southerly direction 0.29 miles to the cul-de-sac, pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph D and funded pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. 3. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of Virginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necessary easements for drainage as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 54, dated December 16, 1975 and Deed Book 1269 Page 205 recorded on July 31, 1987 of record in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office. 4. That this Board does certify that this road was open to public use prior to January 1, 1976, at which time it was open to and used by motor vehicles. 5. That said road known as Hill Drive and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as a public road to become a part of the state secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Robers, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 2/24/88 cc: File Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Va. Department of of Transportation Arnold Covey, Director of Development Review - .r AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINIS`1'RATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988 RESOLUTION 22388-7.d REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF AIRPOINT DRIVE AND AIRPOINT ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Resolution 6987-12.h is requesting acceptance of Airpoint Drive and Airpoint Road into the VDOT Secondary Road System is hereby rescinded. 2. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings therein and upon the application for Airpoint Drive and Airpoint Road, a section of road extending from Bent Mountain Road (Route 221), 0.09 miles north of Tinsley Lane (Route 711), and extending in an easterly direction 0.28 miles to Airpoint Drive and 0.25 miles to Airpoint Road to a turn around, pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph C-1 and funded pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. 3. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of Virginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necessary easements for drainage as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 46, dated July 9, 1965 of record in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office. 4. That this Board does certify that this road was open to public use prior to January 1, 1976, at which time it was open to and used by motor vehicles. 5. That said roads known as Airpoint Drive and Airpoint Road which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public roads to become a part of the state secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Robers, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 2/24/88 cc: File Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Va. Department of of Transportation Arnold Covey, Director of Development Review A -22388-7.e ITEM NUMBER —r-- 'y AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 23, 1988 SUBJECT: Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Hollins -Plantation Shopping Center COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The developer of Hollins -Plantation Shopping Center, CBL Plantation Plaza, Ltd., has requested that Roanoke County accept the deed conveying the water and sewer lines serving the project along with all necessary easements. The water and sewer lines are installed as shown on engineering plans prepared by Barlew-Neuhoff Associates entitled Shopping Center Plantation Road and Hollins Road dated June 19, 1985, which are on file in the Public Facilities Department. The water and sewer line construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT: The values of the water and sewer construction are $13,905 and $19,285, respectively. RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. SUBMITTED BY: /v 4v -D A/4/(_9_f� Phillip T. Henry, P.X'. Director of Engineering APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator s= y ------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Lee Garrett/ No Yes Abs Denied ( > Richard Ro ers Garrett x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred McGraw x To Nickens x Robers x cc: File Clifford Craig Phil Henry John Hubbard E F A -22388-7.f ITEM NUMBER --L- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 23, 1988 SUBJECT: Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Meadow Creek, Section 3 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The developer of Meadow Creek, Section 3, D & J Developers, has requested that Roanoke County accept the deed conveying the water and sewer lines serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sewer lines are installed as shown on Engineering plans prepared by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates entitled Development Plans for Section 3, Meadow Creek dated March 12, 1985, which are on file in the Public Facilities Department. The water and sewer line construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT: The values of the water and sewer construction are $2,710 and $9,658, respectively. RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. SUBMITTED BY: jai Phillip T. HInry, P.E Director of Engineering APPROVED: � � /V Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator - —7"r -5 ------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved (X) Motion by: Lee Garrett/Richard No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Robers Garrett x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred McGraw x To Nickens x Robers x cc: File Phil Henry Cliff Craig John Hubbard 2 AT -THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988 RESOLUTION 22388-7.g REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF OLD MANOR DRIVE AND OLD MANOR COURT INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Old Manor Drive, from Lot 6, Block 2A to Lot 9, Block 2A of Plantation Estates, and Old Manor Court, from its intersection with Old Manor Drive to the cul-de-sac at Lot 14, Block 3 of Plantation Estates to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said roads have been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Plantation Estates Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 9, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on May 22, 1986 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said roads known as Old Manor Drive and Old Manor Court which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public goads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Robers, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 2/24/88 cc: File Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Va. Department of of Transportation Arnold Covey, Director of Development Review A -22388-7.h ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 23, 1988 SUBJECT: Request for approval for a Raffle Permit from the Botetourt Jaycees COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Botetourt Jaycees has requested a Raffle Permit. This application has been reviewed by the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. While this is a Botetourt County organization, they hold their meetings and the raffle in Roanoke County. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit be approved. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Lee Garrett/Richard No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Robers B ttl x Received ( ) Referred To cc: File Bingo File ri e Garrett x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x S A -22388-7.i ITEM NUMBER =" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988 MEETING DATE: February 23, 1988 SUBJECT: Close Out of the Grant from the Virginia Division of Historic Landmarks of the Department of Conservation and Historic Resources for the Roof Replacement on the Old Roanoke County Courthouse COUNTY ADMINISTRAT%OR'S COMMENTS: 1�.n, /✓v"`tw`-ci./ VV SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The project has now been completed for the roof repairs to the old Roanoke County Courthouse, which was funded by a grant through the Virginia Division of Historic Landmarks of the Department of Conservation and Historic Resources. The repair work, which included the replacement of the roof materials, was performed by General Preservation Corporation of Worthington, Ohio. The work has been accepted and the transfer of the title to the Courthouse has been completed with Roanoke College. In order to formally close this grant project, the Board of Supervisors needs to appropriate the $100,000 grant from the State to the above referenced project. Staff will then forward all of the necessary documentation to the State to close this file. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact sufficient to cover the costs. RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests permission to this grant and authorize the County necessary documentation and Funds from the grant were proceed with the closing of Administrator to complete any accounting transactions. 1 SUBMITTED BY: ,,////John M. Chambli s, Jr. Assistant County Administrator APPROVED: L!"Citi It k I Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator _______------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (X) Motion by: Lee Garrett/Richard No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Robers Garrett X Received ( ) Johnson X Referred McGraw X To Nickens X Robers X JMC/cw cc: Diane Hyatt John Chambliss File x AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988 RESOLUTION 22388-8 AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF APPLICATION FOR 1988 VIRGINIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, Roanoke County and Botetourt County will submit a 1988 regional application for Virginia Community Development Block Grant (VCDBG) funds, and WHEREAS, This regional project's name is the Tweeds, Inc. Economic Development Project, and WHEREAS, Roanoke County will request $250,000 of VCDBG funds, and Botetourt County will request $250,000 in similar funding, and WHEREAS, Up to $300,000 from the Virginia Department of Transportation Industrial Access Fund Program will be used to provide an access road to the project site, and WHEREAS, Up to 108 low and moderate income persons are projected to receive employment from this project, and WHEREAS, Citizen participation requirements have been complied with through a duly publicized public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors authorizes the County Administrator to sign and submit all appropriate information and documents necessary to constitute an application for 1988 VCDBG funds. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 2/24/88 cc: File Brent Sheffler, Economic Development Specialist Timothy Gubal.a, Assistant County Administrator Clerk, Botetourt County Board of Supervisors AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRAT10N CENTER, ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988 ORDINANCE 22388-9 AMENDING SECTION 21-73 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, "EXEMPTION FOR ELDERLY AND DISABLED PERSONS," AND REENACTING SAME, TO INCREASE THE TOTAL COMBINED INCOME AND TOTAL COMBINED NET WORTH PROVISIONS WHEREAS, Section 21-73 of the Roanoke County Code estab- lishes the restrictions upon the total combined income at $15,000 and the net comtined financial worth at $55,000 for the exemption from or deferral of real estate taxes for certain elderly or per- manently and totally disabled persons; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 84-232 adopted on December 18, 1984, increased these financial restrictions to $18,000 and $65,000, respectively; and WHEREAS, the General Assembly for the Commonwealth of Virginia amended Section 58.1-3211 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, in 1987, to increase these financial restrictions to $22,000 and $75,000, respectively; and WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held on February 9, 1988, and the second reading was held on February 23, 1988. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Section 21-73 of the Roanoke County Code be amended and reenacted to read and provide as follows: Sec. 21-73. General prerequisites to grant. Exemptions provided for in this division shall be granted only if the following conditions are met: (1) That the total combined income, during the imme- diately preceding calendar year, from all sources, of the owner of the dwelling and his relatives living therein did not exceed eighteen- thousand d0118fs- {$187980} twenty-two thousand dollars ($22,000); provided, however, that the first four thousand dollars ($4,000) of income of each rela- tive, other than the spouse of the owner, who is living in the dwelling shall not be included in such total. (2) That the owner and his spouse did not have a total combined net worth, including all equitable inter- ests, exceeding slxtp-€lve- thousand- dollars {$657000} seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) as of December 31 of the immediately preceding calendar year. The amount of net worth specified herein shall not include the value of the sole dwelling house and up to one acre of land. 2. That this ordinance shall be effective for the 1988 tax year. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: Mary [i. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 2/24/88 cc: File Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Alfred Anderson, County Treasurer Reta Busher, Director of Management & Budget John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Thomas M. Blaylock, Commonwealth Attorney Magistrates Sheriff's Department Roanoke Law .Library County Code File