HomeMy WebLinkAbout7/26/1988 - Adopted Board RecordsAT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY.,DMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 26, 1988
Y
RESOLUTION 72688-1 APPROVING CERTAIN
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FINANCING FOR THE
ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION
WHEREAS, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission (the Com-
mission) was created pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 140 of
the Acts:of the 1986 General Assembly (the Enabling Act); and
WHEREAS, on July 22, 1988, the Commission adopted a
resolution (the Resolution) approving a plan of financing for the
issuance by the Commission of its .airport revenue bonds or notes
(the Bonds) in an amount now estimated not to exceed $7,300,000,
the proceeds of such Bonds to be used to finance a portion of the
costs of the expansion and modernization of certain airport facil-
ities (the Project) located at the Roanoke Regional Airport, Wood-
rum Field (the Airport), and has held a public hearing thereon on
such date; and
WHEREAS, the Commission has requested the Board of Sup-
ervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the County), to
approve the plan of financing as required by Section 147(f) of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code) and Sec-
tion 15.1-1378.1 of the Code of Virginia, as amended (the State
Code); and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Commission's resolution approv-
ing the plan of financing, subject to terms to be agreed upon, a
record of the public hearing and a "fiscal impact statement" with
respect to the Project have been filed with the Board.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. The Board hereby approves the plan of financing of
the Commission for the benefit of the Project, to the extent re-
quired by Section 147(f) of the Code and Section 15.1-1378.1 of
the State Code, to permit the Commission to finance the Project.
The Board confirms that the entire Project is a "capital expendi-
ture" within the meaning of Section 17 of the Contract of January
28, 1987 (the Contract), by and between the City of Roanoke, the
County of Roanoke, and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission,
which has been approved by it on January 12, 1988.
2. Approval of the plan of financing as required by
Section 147(f) of the Code does not constitute an endorsement of
the Bonds, but as required by the Enabling Act, the Bonds shall
provide that the Bonds shall not be a debt of the Commonwealth of
Virginia or any political subdivision thereof, other than the
Commission, and, except to the extent payments are made pursuant
to the Contract, neither the Commonwealth of Virginia nor any
Political subdivision thereof, other than the Commission, shall
be liable, thereon, nor shall the Bonds be payable out of any
funds or properties other than those of the Commission.
3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon
its adoption.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Garrett, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
7/27/88
CC: File
Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance
Members of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission
Mary Parker, Roanoke City Clerk
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY"ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 26, 1988
RESOLUTION 72688-2 AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION OF CERTAIN AGREEMENTS AND
APPROPRIATING PUBLIC FUNDS FOR THE TWEEDS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 15.1-21 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, the Boards .,of Supervisors of Roanoke
County and Botetourt County intend to support and foster the
industrial and economic development of the Roanoke Valley; and
WHEREAS, said counties intend to acquire approximately
65 acres of real estate lying astride the Roanoke County and Bote-
tourt County boundary from the Roanoke Valley Development Corpora-
tion/Greater Roanoke Valley Development Foundation; and
WHEREAS, the development of this site for industrial
and economic development purposes requires that certain public
services and public infrastructure improvements be provided for
this site, including public water, public sewer, and public
access roads; and
WHEREAS, these public services and public infrastruc-
ture improvements will be utilized by Tweeds Inc. for its telemar-
keting and distribution center for catalog business and distribu-
tion facilities for men's and women's apparel; and
WHEREAS, the counties intend to equitably distribute
the revenues produced by local taxation from this industrial and
economic development project; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Botetourt County
at its July 18, 1988, meeting authorized the execution of several
agreements to accomplish these purposes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervi-
sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized
to execute the agreement between Botetourt 'County, Roanoke
County, and Tweeds Inc. to jointly develop that certain 65-acre
tract of real estate lying astride the Roanoke County and Bote-
tourt County boundary line for industrial and economic develop-
ment purposes, upon form approved by the County Attorney.
2. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe-
cute that certain agreement between Botetourt County and Roanoke
County, said agreement to provide for the equitable distribution
of local tax revenues to be derived from the development of the
65-acre tract of real estate for industrial and economic develop-
ment purposes, upon form approved by the County Attorney.
3. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized
to accept a grant from the Virginia Department of Housing and
Community Development for off-site water, sewer, and drainage
improvements.
4. -That the County Administrator is hereby authorized
to execute such other documents and papers as may be necessary to
accomplish the purpose and intent of this resolution.
5. That there is hereby appropriated the additional
sum of $39,405.00 from the Board Contingency Account for grading,
site acquisition, and road bonding fees. That additional sums
for the purpose of satisfying Roanoke County's contractual
obligations to construct roadway access to the Tweeds project
shall be escrowed in future budget years if a qualifying
industry does not locate on this site.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
A COPY TESTS:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke -County Board of Supervisors
7/27/88
CC: File
Timothy Gubala, Economic Development Director
Bonnie Johnson, Botetourt County
Diane Hyatt, Finance Director
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 26, 1988
RESOLUTION 72688-3 RECOMMENDING BONDING
OF ACCESS ROAD TO TWEEDS INC.
WHEREAS, Title 33.1-221, Code of Virginia, provides for
the availability of State Industrial Access Funds for implement-
ing approved improvements to public streets to enhance and pro-
mote industrial development and continued public safety along
public streets; and
WHEREAS, Tweeds Inc. has committed to construct a new
telemarketing and catalog fulfillment center on approximately 25
acres owned by the Greater Roanoke Valley Development Founda-
tion/Roanoke Valley Development Corporation on U.S. Highway 460;
and
WHEREAS, the commitment of private funds exceeds
$3,000,000 and the extension of water and sewer services with
Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development grant
funds will cost $192,640; and
WHEREAS, the cost of an industrial access road to Vir-
ginia Department of Transportation standards has been estimated
at $347,058; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has
determined that the Tweeds project is ineligible for industrial
access funds because of right-of-way abutment technicalities; and
WHEREAS, there are 28+ remaining acres that will be
opened to future development which will be eligible for these
industrial access road fund- with qualifying industries.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors does hereby recommend that Roanoke County
bond the Tweeds industrial access road project up to a cost of
$300,000 and fifty (50%) percent of project costs over that
amount.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
7/27/88
CC: File
Timothy Gubala, Director of Economic Development
Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance
Bonnie Johnson, Botetourt County
ACTION # 72688-4
ITEM NUMBER -
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
July 26, 1988
Proposed Change to the County Ordinance Concerning
the Collection of Fees for Septic Tanks and
Private Wells
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
On June 23, 1987, the Board of Supervisors approved an
Ordinance amending Section 15.1-520_of the Code of,Virginia, to
allow Roanoke County to,regulate the installation of septic tanks
by requiring any person desiring to.install a septic tank to
secure a permit at a cost of $50. Actual revenues for fiscal
year 1987-88 from this permit fee were $19,500.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
At its 1988 session, the General Assembly passed House
Bill 418 which authorizes the State Board of Health to establish
fees for applications for permits to construct on-site sewage
disposal systems and private wells. The fees for on-site sewage
disposal systems cannot exceed $50. The fees for private wells
cannot exceed $25.
The State Board of Health at its May 10, 1988 meeting
approved a .$50 fee-- to be charged for filing an application for an
on-site sewage disposal system permit and a $25 fee to be charged
for filing an application for a private well construction permit.
Local health. departments were notified of these new fees on
June 30, 1988 with implementation effective on July 1, 1988.
Currently;--tfi e -County does not have a private well permit fee,
and the septic tank permit fee is collected by the Roanoke County
Treasurer's office. With the establishment of a concurrent state
septic tank fee, the County will receive 100 percent of the local
permit fee and 45 percent of the State permit fee for inspections
performed by the Health Department within the County for a total
of $72.50 per permit. The County will also receive 45 percent of
the private well permit fees collected or $11.25 per permit.
Roanoke County must now consider whether to continue or
discontinue our local septic tank fee and select among the
various methods of collection included in the new State Health
Department regulations.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS:
Alternative 1. To keep the County's septic tank permit fee;
have the local health department collect both the County and
State permit fees for septic tank and private well installations;
and direct the County Attorney to draft the appropriate ordinance
changes for a first and second reading in the month of August.
Alternative 2. To keep the County's septic tank permit fee;
have the County Treasurer collect both the County and State
permit fees for septic tank and private well installations; and
direct th'e County Attorney to draft the --appropriate ordinance
changes for a first and second reading in the month.of August.
Alternative 3. To discontinue the County's septic tank
permit fee; have the local health department remit the County's
45 percent share of the State septic tank and private well permit
fee revenue periodically; direct the County Attorney to draft the
appropriate ordinance changes for a first and second reading in
the month of August; and.schedule a public hearing.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
-Staff recommends Alternative 1. Attached is a copy of the
State Health Department's Directive to the Regional and District
Directors.
Respectfully submitted,
-iQ,t0. --P-. SLR
Reta R. Busher, Director of
Management and Budget
ACTION
Approved by,
/Pa
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
Approved (X) Motion by: Johnson/McGraw to
Denied ( ) approve Alternative #2 Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
To Nickens
Robers
CC: Reta Busher
Health Department
Devto ent Review
Fres ARHerson
File
VOTE
No Yes Absent
X
X
X
X
X
ACTION # 72688-5
ITEM NUMBER ' 5
r'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: July 26, 1988
AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to execute and approve certain con-
tracts with Lingerfelt Development Corporation and
a contractor for the construction of certain pub-
lic infrastructure improvements - Valleypointe
Project
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
To successfully proceed with the timely completion of the
Valleypointe Phase I Project it is necessary to authorize the
execution of certain documents to provide for the construction of
certain public infrastructure improvements. These improvements
include the construction of the industrial access road (Valley -
pointe Parkway), the construction of additional width of this
industrial access road and its extension to Valleypointe Phase
II, the relocation and construction of Kenworth Drive, the con-
struction of the "loop" road, the intersection improvements to
Peters Creek Road (including signalizatiori and the relocation of
Thirlane Road), and the relocation of the FAA localizer shelter.
In order to expedite this construction, the parties intend
for the County to enter into a single contract for the construc-
tion of all of these improvements. This construction contract
would be entered into in accordance with state and county public
procurement requirements. Only $970,000 of this construction,
however -,--is attributable to the County, of which VDOT industrial
acces"s-funds represent up to $450,000. Lingerfelt Development
Corporation is responsible for the balance of this construction.
Therefore, it is necessary for the County to enter into an
agreement with Lingerfelt Development Corporation ("LDC") wherein
LDC will reimburse the County for its share of these construction
costs for road segments for the loop road, additional width of
Valleypointe Parkway, and the extension of Valleypointe Parkway
to Valleypointe Phase II.
Bid opening is scheduled for July 26, 1988. It is suggested
that the Board authorize the County Administrator to execute this
construction contract in the amount x00fXXNOT TO EXCEED $1..7M The
County has allocated the sum of $970,000 for this portion of the
construction out of the total $2 million allocated to the Valley -
pointe Project.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The financial obligations arising from this construction
contract are included within the $2 million authorization by the
Board for the Valleypointe Project. Lingerfelt Development Cor-
poration will reimburse the County for all costs attributable to
this construction in excess of this County's obligations.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Authorize the County Administrator to execute the con-
tracts for the construction of public infrastructure improvements
in accordance with all public procurement requirements and in the
amount of $ NOT TO EXCEED $1.7M Authorize the County Administra-
tor to execute the reimbursement agreement with Lingerfelt Devel-
opment Corporation.
2. Do not authorize the County Administrator to execute the
contract for the construction of these public infrastructure im-
provements. Do not authorize the County Administrator to execute
the reimbursement agreement with Lingerfelt Development Corpora-
tion.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board favorably consider the adop-
tion of Alternative No. 1.
Respectfully submitted,
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
--------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( Motion by: Johnson/Garrett to— No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) approve alternative #1 with Garrett X
Received ( ) reported amended NOT TO Johnson X
Referred EXCEED $1.7 Million. McGraw _ _ X(abstain)
To Nickens X(absent)
Robers X
CC: Paul Mahoney
Timothy Gubala
Diane Hyatt
File
4 }
l
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 26, 1988
RESOLUTION NO.72688-8 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH
ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I' -
CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain section of the agenda of the
Board of Supervisors for July 12, 1988, designated as Item I -
Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to
each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1
through 6, inclusive, as follows:
1. Minutes of Meeting - April 20, 1988.
2. Confirmation of appointments to the Fifth Planning
District Commission and Planning Commission.
3. Acknowledgment from the Virginia Department ,of
Transportation that the following roads have been
taken into the Secondary System:
a. 0.22 miles of Ashton Lane
b. 0.07 miles of Haven's Trail
C. 0.10 miles of Chippenham Drive
d. 0.04 miles of Kittering Court
e. 0.10 miles of Elizabeth Drive
f. 0.25 miles of Beavers Lane
g. 0.05 miles of Horn Circle
h. 0.15 miles of Shadow Lane
i. 0.09 miles of Lantern Street
j. 0.10 miles of Carolelight Circle
k. 0.37 miles of Tulip Lane
1. 0.08 miles of Sunflower Drive
M. 0.06 miles of Ivy Lane
4. Acceptance of grant restrictions on Clearbrook
Water System
5. Acceptance of sewer line serving Tract A & B on
Dorset Drive
_t
6. Approval of Resolution to State Board of Education
in support of existing classifications of
expenditures.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by Supervisor
Robers, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
A COPY TESTE:
e�
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
7/27/88
CC: File
Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Clifford Craig, Utility Director
Diane Hyatt, Finance Director
Bayes Wilson, Superintendent of Schools
K
ACTION # 72688-8a
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
July 26, 1988
SUBJECT: Confirmation of Committee Appointments
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The following nominations were made at the previous board meeting
and must now be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. The
nominee has.agreed to serve.
Fifth Planning Commission
Charles S. Garrett has been nominated by Supervisor Garrett to
serve a three-year term as Citizen Representative. His term will
expire June 30, 1991.
Planning Commission
Ronald L. Massey has been nominated by Supervisor Johnson to
serve the unexpired four-year term of Carolyn J. Flippen,
representing the Hollins Magisterial District. His term will
expire December 31, 1991. 'A
SUBMITTED BY:
Mary IF.. Allen
Deputy Clerk
APPROVED:
mr"
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( 4 Motion by: McGraw/Robers to No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) approve Garrett X
Received ( ) Johnson X
Referred McGraw X
To Nickens absent
Robers x
CC: Fifth Planning Commission File
Planning Commission File
File
ACTION # 72688-8b
ITEM NUMBER I-3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
July 26, 1988
Acknowledgment from Virginia Department of
Transportation of acceptance of certain roads into
the Secondary System.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION
.Attached are letters from Oscar Mabry, Deputy
Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Transportation
acknowledging the following additions to the Secondary.System,
all effective July 1, 1988:
a. 0.22 miles of Ashton Lane (Route 859)
b. 0.08 miles of Haven's Trail (Route 861)
C. 0.10 miles of Chippenham Drive (Route 1980)
d. 0.04 miles of Kettering Court (Route 1981)
e. 0.10 miles of Elizabeth Drive (Route 1043)
f. 0.25 miles of Beavers Lane (Route 1066)
g. 0.05 miles of Horn Circle (Route 1071)
h. 0.15 miles of Shadow Lane (Route 1527).
i. 0.09 miles of Lantern Street (Route 1598)
j. 0.10 miles of Carolelight Circle (Route 1739)
k. 0.37 miles of Tulip Lane (Route 1017)
1. 0.08 miles of Sunflower Drive (Route 1019)
M. 0.06 miles of Ivy Lane (Route 1023)
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY:
-,z/l/
Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge
Deputy Clerk County Administrator
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: McGraw/Robers to approve No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Garrett x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
To Nickens absent
Robers x
CC: File
Phillip Henry, Engineering Director
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 26, 1988'
RESOLUTION 72688-8c AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION OF A CERTAIN GRANT AGREEMENT
FOR THE CLEARBROOK WATER SYSTEM
WHEREAS, on April 12, 1988, the Board of Supervisors
authorized the purchase of the public water system owned by the
Clearbrook Water Association; and
WHEREAS, Roanoke County purchased said water system
from the Clearbrook Water Association by satisfying its existing
loan with the Farmer's Home Administration at a discount; and
WHEREAS, said Association also was the recipient of a
water grant from the Farmer's Home Administration, it now being
necessary for the County to accept said grant restrictions.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervi-
sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized
to execute a water grant agreement with the Farmer's Home Admini-
stration for the Clearbrook Water System on behalf of Roanoke
County, upon form approved by the County Attorney.
2. That said water grant agreement contains certain
restrictions upon the utilization of grant funds by the recipient
or grantee, and that said grant restrictions are set out in the
attached grant agreement, Form FmHA 1942-31 (4-85).
On motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by Supervisor
Robers, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
A COPY TESTS:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
7/27/88
CC: File
Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance
Clifford Craig, Utility Director
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
ACTION NO. 72688-8d
I TEM.,:NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: July 26, 1988
SUBJECT: Acceptance of sewer line serving Tract A & B
on Dorset Drive.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The developer, Danny Gilbert, has -
accept the Deed'conveying;the sewer
along with all necessary easements.
requested that Roanoke County
line serving the subdivision
The sewer line is installed as shown on Engineering -plans
prepared by Buford T. Lumsden &Associates entitled Gilbert Sewer
Extension, dated February 10, 1988, which are on file in the
Engineering Department. The sewer line construction meets the
specifications and the plans approved by the County. .
FISCAL IMPACT: ti
The value of the sewer construction is $6,474.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff _recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the
sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all -necessary
easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a
Deed for the transfer of these facilities.
SUBMITTED BY:
Phillip T. Henry, P.
Director of Engineering
APPROVED -
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (X) Motion by: McGraw/Robers to accept No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Garrett x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
To Nickens xZabsent)
Robers' x
CC: File
Phillip Henry
Clifford Craig
John Hubbard
n
L
A
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 26, 1988"
RESOLUTION 72688-8e IN SUPPORT OF THE
EXISTING DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
CLASSIFICATIONS OF EXPENDITURES
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 22.1-94 of the 1950 Code
of Virginia, as amended, a governing body may make appropriations
to a school board; and
WHEREAS, the amount appropriated by the governing body
for public schools shall relate to such major classifications as
may be prescribed by the State Board of Education; and
WHEREAS, the State Board of Education has established
thirteen (13) major categories or classifications of expenditures
in a school board budget to be funded --instruction, summer
school, adult education, other educational programs, administra-
tion, attendance and health, pupil transportation, operation/main-
tenance, school food service, debt service, capital outlay,
refund of revenue, and fixed charges; and W
WHEREAS, the State Board of Education in its proposed
1989-90 annual school report is proposing to reduce the number of
existing classifications of expenditures to five (5)--instruc-
tion,general support, non -instructional operation, other uses of
funds, and facilities; and
WHEREAS, Roanoke County has established the funding of
its school system as one of its highest priorities; and
WHEREAS, the proposed reduction in the classifications
of expenditures may result in a severe negative impact on Roanoke
County's willingness to continue appropriating funds to the
r
school board budget; and
WHEREAS, this negative impact could affect the County's
commitment to quality education.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Super-
visors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby request that the
State Bgard of Education recognize the negative effect the pro-
posed reduction in the number of classifications expenditures
would have on the Roanoke County school system; and
Further, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, does hereby request that the State Board of Education
continue the existing classifications of expenditures and reject
the proposed amendment to reduce the number of classifications to
five (5) .
Further, the Deputy Clerk is hereby authorized to for-
ward certified copies of this resolution to the State Board of
Education and the Roanoke Valley legislative,delegation.
On motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by Supervisor
Robers, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
7/27/88
CC: File
State Board of Education
Roanoke Valley Legislators
Bayes Wilson, School Superintendent
ACTION # 72688-9
ITEM NUMBER6tf
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE -7 87- Y
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June -28* -1388-- July 26, 1988
AGENDA ITEM: Petition of Bennett E. Scott for a Special
Exception Permit to operate a landfill for construction debris on
1.50 acres of a 8.55 acre tract located east of South Indian
Grave Road (State Route 845) approximately 500 feet south of its
intersection with Back Creek Road (State Route 676) in the Cave
Spring Ma5isterial District.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION
See attached Staff Report.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The staff recommends approval of the request to renew the
Special Exception Permit with the conditions cited at the end of
the staff report.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY:
'z'40 -
J,6,h Hartley
puty Zoning Administrator
�eA-
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
------------------------------------ -------------------------------
Approved (X)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
ACTION
Motion by: Robers/McGraw to grant
permit for 6 months pending report Garrett
from staff concerning this type of Johnson
landfill. Johnson McGraw to McGraw
grant permit with conditions Nickens
included in report. Robers
CC: File
Jon Hartley, Planning Dept.
Zoning Administrator
MOW5.
No Yes Abs
x
x
X
X
x
N
EACtIXrY LOCAT[ON
'rhis site, known as the T. R. Leslie Debris Landfill is located on Route 845
west of the intersection of Rotite 676 and Route 220 near Red'Hill Church.
PGRM[T CONO CCIONS
M
[n order for this permit to remain valid the following sttpulations shall be
complied with in the uper.:ttlon of tilts factlity:
I. No hazardous waste, paper or ash shall be allowed on this factLity.
OnIy-.those wastes specifically identified -[n_>,�he facility description
portion of thLs facility shall be allowed.
2• A G" prO8ressive suit cover shall be required on the waste.
3. Access shall he limtted to tilts EacLlityyat_.:1L_ times.
4. Upon termination of disposal activities on tilts situ 2 feet of soil ,.
- --- - - -
-:—cover -shall be-applied--to-the arearior to radin
P g g and seeding. A
minimum' of 6" of the' final 2 feet of soil cover 'shall be an
impermeable clay material.
c. Suggested Conditions of Approval: (1) Renewal will be for a
2 -year time period. (2) Subject to continued State Health
Department approval. (3) Continue to have stockpiled cover
material available on site, with a tracked front-end loader
available during landfilling activities. (4) Maintain controlled
access at all times either by personal observation or by using the
gate. (5) Limit the hours of operation to 8:00 am to 5:00 pm
Monday through Saturday.
ACTION # 72688-10
ITEM NUMBER
ATA REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: July 26, 1988
AGENDA ITEM: Petition of Richfield Retirement Community for a
Special Exception Permit to expand an existing home for adults on
a 2.25 acre tract located on the west side of Alleghany Drive
(Route 64?) approximately 1,000 feet north-of...its intersection
with West Main Street (Route 11) in the Catawba Magisterial
District.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION
See attached Staff Report.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The staff recommends approval of the request to expand
the Special Exception Permit with the condition that development
be in substantial conformity to the attached site plan.
SUBMITTED BY:
D & 0"t4 - -
Dale Castellow
Acting Director of Planning
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (X) Motion by: McGraw/Johnson to approve No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) with condition tnat develop—m—e-n-=e Garrett x
Received ( ) in substantlai con ormi y o e Johnson x
Referred site plan. McGraw x
To Nickens x
Robers x
CC: File
Planning Department
Development Review
EXISTING FACILITY
81 APARTMENTS
EXISTING FACILITY
106 APARTMENTS
0 100 200
,781-6
1 ST
PROPOSED
BUILDING
O 96 BEDm
P
SITE PLAN,
N
Itt
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, ON TUESDAY, JULY 26, 1988
ORDINANCE 72688-11 AMENDING AND
REENACTING CHAPTER 5, ANIMALS AND
FOWLS, OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE
CONCERNING THE LICENSING OF DOG .AND
RABIES CONTROL
WHEREAS, by Chapter 538, Virginia Acts of Assembly,
1988 Session, Section 3.1-796.85 of the -1950 Code of Virginia,
was amended to require the licensure of any dog four months old
or older owned by any person; and
WHEREAS, by the same chapter, Section 3.1-796.97:1 was
added to the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requiring vaccina-
tion for rabies of all dogs and domesticated cats by a currently
licensed veterinarian and setting forth the standards for such
vaccine.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia as follows:
1. That Chapter 5, Animals and fowl of the Roanoke
County Code be amended and reenacted to read as follows:
Sec. 5-41. Required
It shall be unlawful for any person to own a dog six
J6}- four 4) months old or over in this county, unless such dog
is currently licensed under the provisions of this division.
Sec. 5-45. When --and where tax due and payable
The license tax on dogs shall be due and payable at the
office of the County Treasurer as follows:
(1) On or before January 1 and not later than January
31 of each year, the owner of any dog six- J6� four (4) months
old or older shall pay such tax.
(2) If a dog shall become six- J6� four (4) months
of age or if a dog over six -J6) four (4) months of age unli-
censed by this county shall come into the possession of any per -
1
son in this county between January 1 and October 31 of any year,
the license tax for the current calendar year shall be paid forth-
with by the owner.
(3) If a dog shall become six- J6} four (4) months
of age or if a dog over six- J6� four (4) months of age unli-
censed by this county shall come into the possession of any per-
son in this county between November 1 and December 31 of any
year, the license tax for the succeeding calendar year shall be
paid forthwith by the owner and such license shall protect the
dog from the date of payment of the license tax.
Sec. 5-50. Tacr to be worn by dog; exceptions.
(a) A dog license tag shall be securely fastened to a
substantial collar by the owner or custodian of the dog and worn
by such dog. It shall be unlawful for -the owner or custodian to
permit any licensed dog six -f 6} four (4) months old or over
to run at large at any time without a license tag.
(b) The owner of a dog -may remove the collar and li-
cense tag required by this section when the dog is engaged in
lawful hunting; when the dog is competing in a dog show; when the
dog has a skin condition which would be exacerbated by the wear-
ing of a collar; when the dog is confined; or when the dog is
under the immediate control of its owner.
(c) Any dog not wearing a collar bearing a license tag
of the proper calendar year shall prima facie be deemed to be
unlicensed, and in any proceeding under this article, the burden
of proof of the fact that such dog has been licensed or is other-
wise not required to bear a tag at the time shall be on the owner
of the dog.
Sec. 5-66. Vaccination required.
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to own, keep,
hold or harbor any dog or cat over the age of six --f6} four
- _(4) months within the county, unless the dog or cat has been vac-
cinated with a vaccine licensed by the United States Department
of Agriculture for use in that species within a period of the
immediately preceding thirty-six (36) months.
(b) Any person transporting a dog six- J6� four (4)
months of age or over into the county from some other jurisdic-
tion shall be required to comply with this section within thirty
(30) days after bringing the dog into the county.
Sec. 5-67. Vaccination certificate
At the time of vaccination of a dog or cat pursuant to
Section 5-66, a certificate shall be issued to the owner of the
dog or cat, which certificate shall be properly executed and
signed by a currently licensed veterinarian, and shall certify
M
that the dog or cat has been vaccinated as required by Section
5-66. The certificate shall show the date of vaccination, a
brief description of the dog or cat, and its ,'sex and breed, and
the name of the owner of the dog or cat. A copy of such certifi-
cate shall be sent at once to the eountp county's animal con-
trol officer and kept on file where at which office duplicate
copies may be obtained by the dog's or cat's owner, upon payment
of such fee as is prescribed by the Board of Supervisors.
Sec. 5-68. Impoundment of unvaccinated dogs or cats.
(a) Any dog or cat found in the county which is not
vaccinated as required in division shall be impounded by the ani-
mal control officer or other officer and, held at the animal shel-
ter for' a period of seven (7) days. The dog or cat may be
returned to its owner, upon proof of ownership, vaccination of
the dog or cat, and payment of the cost of impounding the dog or
cat. Such payment shall not relieve the owner from 'prosecution
for violating Section 5-66.
(b) At the expiration of the seven-day (7) period, any
dog or cat impounded under this section and not claimed by its
owner may be disposed of in accordance with the provision of Sec-
tion 29-213766 3.1-796.96 of the code of Virginia.
2. Severability. The sections, paragraphs, sentences,
clauses of this chapter are severable, and if any phrase, clause,
sentence, paragraph, or section of this chapter shall be declared
unconstitutional or invalid by the valid judgment or decree of a
court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining phrases, clauses,
sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this chapter shall remain
valid.
3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after August 1, 1988.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Johnson, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
7/27/88
CC: File
3
A COPY TESTS:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Kenneth Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer
John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Magistrate
Sheriff's Department
Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, Roanoke, 24016
Main Library
Roanoke County Code
George Nester, Town Manager, Town of Vinton
0