HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/13/1988 - Adopted Board RecordsAT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 1988
RESOLUTION 121388-1 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO
CAROL MARIE GILBERT, M.D., UPON BEING
SELECTED AS THE OUTSTANDING OPERATIONAL
MEDICAL DIRECTOR, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES AWARD
WHEREAS, Dr. Carol M. Gilbert serves as the medical director
for three prehospital services, which includes the Roanoke County
Fire & Rescue Department, the Roanoke County Fire & Rescue
Department Hazardous Materials Response Team, and Lifeguard -10
Medevac Program operated by Roanoke Memorial Hospital; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Gilbert currently serves as Director of Trauma
Services and Assistant Director of Surgical Education at Roanoke
Memorial Hospitals, as well as Assistant Professor of Surgery,
University of Virginia School of Medicine; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Gilbert has provided leadership for these
prehospital services by her high standards, training and
evaluation process as well as encouraging the cooperation of
other career agencies; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Gilbert's extensive experience and dedication
has proven invaluable in the successful operation of the Roanoke
County agencies and Lifeguard -10.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke County Board
of Supervisors extends its congratulations to CAROL MARIE
GILBERT, M.D. for receiving the OUTSTANDING OPERATIONAL MEDICAL
DIRECTOR award from the Commonwealth of Virginia Emergency
Medical Services.
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County wishes
to express its deep appreciation for her service and dedication
to the County citizens.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Resolutions of Congratulations File
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON DECEMBER 13, 1988
RESOLUTION 121388-2 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO
BETSY STARNES UPON BEING SELECTED AS MISS
JOB'S DAUGHTERS OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, Betsy Starnes, daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Starnes,
has been active in Job's Daughters, an organization associated
with the Masons, and is a former Honor Queen of Bethel 7; and
WHEREAS, on November 26, 1988, in Norfolk, Virginia, she was
honored by being selected from 44 contestants and 10 finalists
from throughout the state as Miss Job's Daughters of Virginia;
and
WHEREAS, this honor recognizes her knowledge of the Job's
Daughters rituals, which strive to teach young women ages 11 and
over to become stronger individuals and stresses such attributes
as integrity.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia, wishes to express its
congratulations to Miss Starnes for attaining this high honor in
Job's Daughters; and
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors expresses its pride to
Miss Starnes, a Junior at William Byrd High School, for this
outstanding achievement and wishes her continued success in her
future endeavors.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Robers and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Resolutions of Congratulations File
2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON DECEMBER 13, 1988
RESOLUTION 121388-3 EXPRESSING THE
APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO WILEY W. MCGUIRE FOR
NINETEEN YEARS OF SERVICE TO ROANOKE
COUNTY
WHEREAS, Wiley W. McGuire was first employed in April, 1969,
as a Plumbing Inspector in the Building Inspections Department;
and
WHEREAS, Wiley W. McGuire has also served as the Assistant
Building Official, as of January 1, 1984, for the Department of
Construction Building Services.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation
and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to
WILEY W. MCGUIRE
for nineteen years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to
Roanoke County.
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best
wishes for a happy, restful and productive retirement.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Robers and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Al en, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Resolutions of Appreciation File
D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON DECEMBER 13, 1988
RESOLUTION 121388-4 EXPRESSING THE
APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
ROANOKE COUNTY TO BARBARA FASNACHT FOR
OUTSTANDING CONTRIBUTIONS TO HER COMMUNITY
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors is indebted
to its citizens who offer their time, talent and energy through
many volunteer activities and desires that these efforts be
recognized in an appropriate manner; and
WHEREAS, Barbara Fasnacht served with distinction as
President of Cherokee Hills Homeowners Association for 1988/89,
having served one previous term as President; and
WHEREAS, under her leadership, the Cherokee Hills Homeowners
Association was instrumental in getting the roads in Cherokee
Hills Subdivision brought into the state secondary system, and
helped to reduce speeding in the neighborhood; and
WHEREAS, she provided a calm positive approach in efforts
to solve
problems with
the water
system and the potential of a
future landfill
site
in the community, and because of her
concern,
was appointed
as a member
of the Roanoke County Citizens
Landfill
Advisory Council
in July,
1988.
NOW,
THEREFORE, BE
IT RESOLVED
that the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia, expresses its deep appreciation and
the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to BARBARA
FASNACHT for her leadership and outstanding contributions to
the quality of life in her community, and Roanoke County.
On motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by Supervisor
Robers and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Resolutions of Appreciation File
2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON DECEMBER 13, 1988
RESOLUTION 121388-5 EXPRESSING THE
APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO DOT ELLER FOR
OUTSTANDING CONTRIBUTIONS TO HER
COMMUNITY
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors is indebted
to its citizens who offer their time, talent and energy through
many volunteer activities and desires that these efforts be
recognized in an appropriate manner; and
WHEREAS, Dot Eller has been a driving force in the many
accomplishments of the Fort Lewis Civic League, and served with
distinction as President during 1987/88; and
WHEREAS, the Fort Lewis Civic League is composed of 370
members and does provide the community with services such as food
baskets for the needy, elderly and shut-ins, and has been
instrumental in improving the Andrew Lewis Place Subdivision
water lines, and the draining of the pond on Route 460; and
WHEREAS,. the Fort Lewis Civic League further provides
services to the community by participation in the Clean Valley
Council, adopting Route 11-460 as a cleanup project and providing
a $200 scholarship each year for a Glenvar High School senior.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia, expresses its deep appreciation and
the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to DOT
ELLER for her leadership and outstanding contributions to the
quality of life in her community, and Roanoke County.
On motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by Supervisor
Robers and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Resolutions of Appreciation File
2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON DECEMBER 13, 1988
RESOLUTION 121388-6 EXPRESSING THE
APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO KENNETH D. BOWEN
FOR OUTSTANDING CONTRIBUTIONS TO HIS
COMMUNITY
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors is indebted
to its citizens who offer their time, talent and energy through
many volunteer activities and desires that these efforts be
recognized in an appropriate manner; and
WHEREAS, Kenneth D. Bowen has served with distinction during
1985/86 and 1987/88 as President of Mason Cove Civic Club, Inc.;
and during 1986 as Vice President; and
WHEREAS, under his leadership, the Mason Cove Civic Club,
Inc. has been instrumental in reviving the Neighborhood Watch
Program and helped the community deal in a professional manner
with such issues as the flooding in Masons Creek, the road
repairs on Bradshaw Road, the improvements to the Mason Cove
Elementary School and the potential of a future landfill site in
the community; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Bowen has also been active in youth athletics
and is serving his second term on the Roanoke County Parks &
Recreation Advisory Commission and was Vice -Chairman in 1987/88.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia, expresses its deep appreciation and
the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to KENNETH
D. BOWEN for his leadership and outstanding contributions to
the quality of life in his community, and Roanoke County.
On motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by Supervisor
Robers and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Resolutions of Appreciation File
r%
ACTION # A121388-7
ITEM NUMBER Z —
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 13, 1988
AGENDA ITEM:
Receipt of Annual Audit
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS. -
BACKGROUND:
The audit firm of Peat Marwick
completed the annual audit for the year
auditors have issued an unqualified
statements, and at this time, the staff
with our financial report and an
financial position of the County.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Main & Co., has recently
ended June 30, 1988; the
opinion on these financial
would like to provide you
analysis of the current
Roanoke County received the Certificate of Achievement for
Excellence in Financial Reporting for the year ended June 30,
1987. This award is reproduced in our current report on Page 10.
This is the fourth consecutive year in which the County has
received this recognition. We are extremely proud of the award
because it shows that we have made a continuing commitment to
professionalism in financial reporting and have complied with all
generally accepted accounting principles. We plan to again
submit our Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year
ended June 30, 1988 for consideration for this award.
As a net result of the operations for the 1987-88 fiscal
year, the County will be able to add $1,656,795 to its current
fund balance of $414,063, which will replenish the fund balance
to its recommended level. Attachment B shows a breakdown of the
source of these additional monies. The majority of this excess
can be attributed to additional revenues collected from the
proration of personal property taxes. This was the first year
that proration was in effect for the full year. A smaller
portion is the result of savings within the County departments.
Attachment D graphically shows a breakdown of the revenues
of the County. The largest portion of revenues continues to come
from the Commonwealth (37.6 percent) followed by real estate
taxes (29.4 percent) and personal property taxes (12.2 percent).
1 of 11
cc:
Attachment F graphically shows the actual expenditures of
all funds of the County. In this graph, you can see that
education is the largest expenditure department with 58.5 percent
of the total budget.
The County can continue to be proud of its debt to equity
ratios. Attachment G shows that the County still maintains the
lowest bonded debt to assessed value ratio and the lowest net
bonded debt per capita ratio in the Valley. At the same time,
the County can claim the highest assessed value amount in the
Valley.
Attachment H shows that at June 30, 1988, the County of
Roanoke was successful in reaching its goal of replenishing fund
balance. At June 30, 1988, the fund balance was 5.32 percent of
the General Fund budget. However, it is important to keep in
mind that during the current year, this fund balance has now been
depleted to $2,070,858, which is 3.55 percent of the General
Fund.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
I
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the
audit for the 1987-88 fiscal year and that the additional
$11656,795 generated from operations be appropriated to the
Unappropriated Balance.
Respectfully submitted,
Approved by,
Diane D. Hyatte Elmer C. Hodge
Director of Finance County Administrator
Approved
Denied
Received
Referred
To
ACTION
(x) Motion by: Lee Garrett/Harry
( ) C. Nickens to approve staff
( ) recommendation
File
Diane Hyatt
Reta Busher
Don Myers
2 of 11
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Garrett x
Johnson x
McGraw x
Nickens x
Robers x
ACTION # A121388-8
ITEM NUMBER T) -
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 13, 1988
AGENDA ITEM: Request from Cave Spring Rescue Squad for
Assistance in Constructing a New Rescue Squad
Building
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
d u�c�t)rn�'G a.ZL�/�
BACKGROUND: �`'"I/� '`� "'`;`^ '''" 0-14,1 Cb��.
In 1985, the residents of Roanoke County approved a bond
referendum for the construction of two new fire stations, one in
Bonsack and one in the Back Creek area. Currently, the Back
Creek Fire Station is out for bids. The original bids came in
overbudget so the project was scaled back and re -bid. The bid
will be awarded in March, 1989, and construction is scheduled for
completion in July, 1989. The land for the Bonsack Fire Station
has been donated and the proposals for A/E services are being
evaluated. Construction is anticipated to be complete in
September, 1989.
During 1985, the Cave Spring Rescue Squad also identified
the need for additional space to house existing equipment and
provide sufficient space to handle additional membership required
to meet service demands. However, the Squad chose to maintain
their independence and looked to alternatives other than the
County government to fund their facility- improvements. An
accident that permanently damaged the Cave Spring Rescue Squad
stand-by room and election of new leadership has caused the Squad
to re-evaluate their alternatives with regard to a time schedule
that will meet the ever increasing need for services in the Cave
Spring area.
The Cave Spring Rescue Squad was organized in the late 1950s
serving an area that was predominately rural in nature. Since
that time, the area has rapidly urbanized causing the
organization to become one of the busiest rescue squads in the
County. Currently, the squad serves a populous of approximately
27,000 and responds to over 1,200 emergency medical calls per
year.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Cave Spring Rescue Squad has approached staff with a
request for the County to help them construct a two-story
facility with 8,000 square feet of space. Staff has worked with
squad personnel reviewing alternative sites, facility size, and
funding requirements and staff concurs with the proposed
two-story facility. After evaluating several sites, staff and
squad personnel feel the most feasible and cost effective
location is the County -owned property at the corner of Valley
Forge and Brambleton Avenues.
The facility is estimated to cost $500,000. The Cave Spring
Rescue Squad is requesting an appropriation from the Board of
Supervisors in an amount of $300,000. The squad has agreed to
pay the architectural/engineering costs for the project as well
as the balance of the construction costs. The squad will sell
its current site and use the proceeds to help pay their share of
the construction costs. The balance will be obtained. through
their annual fund drive effort.
The other two properties owned by the Squad will not be a
part of this transaction. It is the organization's intent to
sell these properties and use the proceeds to purchase a rescue
truck.
During discussions with several Board members, staff was
asked to provide cost information for adding a third floor to the
facility for additional office space for County personnel. The
architect/engineer estimated the cost to range from $200,000 to
$280,000 depending upon the type of interior finishing with an
additional $12,000 to $14,000 for A/E services.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS:
1. Construct a two-story 8,000 square foot facility at an
approximate cost of $500,000 on County -owned property at
the corner of Valley Forge and Brambleton Avenues.
Appropriate $300,000 through a lease/purchase in the
FY 1989-90 budget process as the County's share of the
construction costs. Sell the existing Cave Spring
Rescue Squad site and use the proceeds for construction
costs with the understanding that the squad would raise
the balance of the cost of the project. Authorize the
County Administrator and the County Attorney to
negotiate an agreement with the Cave Spring Rescue Squad
regarding the use of the County property and the payment
of project costs.
2. Approve Alternative 1 and appropriate an additional
$295,000 through a lease/purchase in the FY 1989-90
budget process for the construction of a third floor
office area or an additional 4,000 square feet of space.
3. Approve Alternative
$215,000 through a
budget process for
shell.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
1 and appropriate an
lease/purchase in the
the construction of a
z-2
additional
FY 1989-90
third floor
The expansion of the Cave Spring Rescue Squad facility is
the next priority on the facility improvement plan after the 1985
bond projects. Staff recommends Alternative 1.
Respectfully submitted,
Approved by,
Au J
�/ 4
Thomas C. Fuqua Elmer C. Hodge '��
Chief of Fire and Rescue Department County Administrator
Approved
Denied
Received
Referred
To
ACTION
(x) Motion by: Richard W.Robers/
( ) Harry C. Nickens to approve
( ) Alternative #1
cc: File
Thomas C. Fuqua,
Reta Busher
Diane Hyatt
Paul Mahoney
Chief, Fire & Rescue
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
VOTE
No Yes Abs
_ x
_ x
_ x
_ x
X
v
W
9,
W
V
b
4
n
0
Q
t�
z
Y
J
J �
v
W
9,
W
V
b
h
J
J �
0
v
W
9,
W
V
b
0
�n
�
I
x
LL
n
1
3
Aj
euj
'14
Q
I
V
1N
�(
14
E
u
�9
z
0
hi
IA,
i
r
i
c
1
Q
ti
O
I
V
1N
14
W.
0
hi
IA,
c
1
Q
O
O
I
0
hi
IA,
c
1
V
�
c
o
a
s
b
0.
I
V
b
h
w
LL
cr
Ilk
s
ft
Q6
V
1
Lk
0
�o
�
Z
h
i
y
z
y
x^
L
V
s
�
ti
3
1
Lk
i
y
z
1
3
b
R
IL
LL
,
s2
CQ
QLl
_,
v�
o
o
0
�
Q
u
�
v
�
o
�
1
z
i
�
�
r
i
L
�
y
�
e
1) '-2—
0
N
a�
�o
J
r
t
0
a
�
�i
Y
I
IJ:
a
=
C
W
�
I
�
K3
t
V
v
1) '-2—
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY , VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 1988
RESOLUTION 121388-9 OF SUPPORT FOR THE CONCEPT
OF A REGIONAL WORK FARM FOR NON-VIOLENT
OFFENDERS
WHEREAS, there exists a need in the Roanoke Valley for
a productive use of non-violent offenders presently being housed
in the valley's jails; and
WHEREAS, many non-violent offenders could be available
to serve the citizens in their localities as well pay their debt
to society; and this regional work farm could provide services to
the localities resulting in savings in jail operations, and also
give non-violent offenders the opportunity to perform productive
work for their community, and
WHEREAS, the Sheriff of Roanoke County has begun a
study of the feasibility of a work farm for nonviolent
offenders, and the Honorable Kenneth Trabue has expressed his
support for a work farm that would be regional in nature.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia supports the concept of a regional
work farm, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors
supports the continuation of the study being conducted by Sheriff
Michael Kavanaugh, and that other law enforcement officials be
invited to participate in the study to determine the need for
such a regional facility.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
12/15/88
CC: File
The Honorable Kenneth Trabue
Sheriff Michael Kavanaugh
W. Robert Herbert, City Manager, City of Roanoke
Randolph Smith, City Manager, City of Salem
George Nester, Town Manager, Town of Vinton
ACTION NUMBER # A121388-10
ITEM NUMBER —
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 13, 1988
AGENDA ITEM: Request for Approval of Employee Handbook.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
��—rr-vr�•.� �-ri-v-w'� cry
BACKGROUND:
The Department of Human Resources has worked on revising the
County Employee Handbook during the past twelve months. The
final draft submitted for your consideration incorporates -
substantial policy changes, revisions to comply with new state
and federal laws and many of the recommendations submitted by
county department heads, constitutional officers, and the
Employee Advisory Committee. The handbook was forwarded to the
Board of Supervisors on November 9, 1988, and discussed in a work
session on November 22, 1988.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Attached is a copy of the final draft of the Employee
Handbook. This final draft incorporates specific changes which
were requested at the November 22, 1988, work session. These
minor changes are included in the handbook and are also indicated
on the separate attachment.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends adoption of the Employee Handbook with an
effective date of January 1, 1989. The Department of Human
Resources will conduct training sessions on the new handbook
during the months of January and February, in order to inform
employees of the changes in county policy.
SUBMITTED BY: APPRO D BY:
D. K. Cook Elmer C. Hod e
Director of Human Resources County Administrator
------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Steven A. McGraw to approve Garrett x
Received ( ) statt recommen ation Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
To Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
D. Keith Cook
'2) — d7l
ROANOKE
L)—
ROANOKE COUNTY EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK
FINAL CHANGES
Purpose and Scope of Handbook (p, iii)
Employee Handbook is effective on January 1, 1989. A
current handbook will be kept in each department and will be
available to employees within that department.
Chapter II
Part-time and temporary employment will not be restricted to
1500 hours per year. (1500 hour provision included in handbook
draft but subsequently changed after Board of Supervisors work
session.) (p. 3)
Break periods may not exceed fifteen minutes in the morning
and fifteen minutes in the afternoon. (p. 6)
Chapter III
Promotion policy will not require a 5% increase.
Promotional salaries are negotiable between the employee and the
department head. (Promotion policy included in handbook draft
but subsequently changed after Board of Supervisors work
session.) (p. 8)
Recall period for layoffs changed from twelve months to
twenty-four months. (p. 10-11)
Chapter IV
Inactive disciplinary actions are maintained for archival
purposes in accordance with the retention schedule established by
the Commonwealth of Virginia. (p. 14)
Dismissals normally occur for the use of alcohol while on
the job and the use, possession or sale of unlawfully possessed
controlled substances while on the job. (p. 15)
The conduct chapter includes a reference to the type of
disciplinary action which may occur after receiving two
unsatisfactory performance evaluations. (p. 15)
Procedural guarantees cover only fire fighters and emergency
medical technicians who are employed by Roanoke County. (p. 16)
Employees may enter a rebuttal statement against any
disciplinary action in the personnel file. (p. 16)
Chapter VII
A holiday is considered an eight-hour period. (p. 31)
Clarified section on Flexible Merit and Meritorious Increase
Programs. (p. 31)
Chapter IX
In unusual situations, the thirty -day notification period
may be waived in cases of maternity and paternity, with the
concurrence of the Department Head. (p. 41)
A holiday is considered an eight-hour period. (p. 43)
Chapter XI
No solicitation shall be permitted in any county buildings
except as provided by county building use regulations or by those
entities approved by or sponsored by the Board of Supervisors.
(p. 47)
12-6-88
ACTION # A121388-11
ITEM NUMBER Z -
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 13, 1988
AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval from the Board of Supervisors
to accept a $9,000 Planning Grant for Pinkard Court from the
Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
4 .
7
BACKGROUND
The Pinkard Court Community has been identified by Roanoke County
and Virginia Water Project, Inc. as a potential candidate for
CDBG funding. Located south of the intersection of Routes 419
and 220, Pinkard Court is currently in need of road improvements,
upgrading and expansion of the public water system, sewer system
construction, storm sewers, drainage facilities, and housing
rehabilitation. Virginia Water Project, Inc. recently awarded
funds to Roanoke County for a preliminary engineering report for
the water and sewer systems.
Authorization was given on July 12, 1988 by the Board of
Supervisors to submit an application for a $9,000 Planning Grant
for Pinkard Court from Virginia Department of Housing and
Community Development (VHCD). Roanoke County was notified on
September 19, 1988 by VHCD that the grant was awarded to fund
specific advance planning activities for Pinkard Court.. These
activities will include preliminary engineering designs for
streets/roads, water, sewer, storm drains, geological and
archaeological studies, housing rehabilitation assessment and
design, as well as a community income assessment.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION
Acceptance of the $9,000 Planning Grant from Virginia Department
of Housing and Community Development for Pinkard Court will
permit the Department of Planning to commence advance planning
activities to determine the feasibility of making application for
a CDBG construction grant.
NEW -104
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS 0
Alternative #1: Accept Virginia Housing and Community
Development Planning Grant in the amount of $9,000 for Pinkard
Court to conduct advance planning activities needed for CDBG
construction grant application.
Alternative #2: Do not accept planning grant.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends alternative #1.
SUBMITTED BY:
Dc-'& (lavi-em)
Dale Castellow
Acting Director, Planning
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Ifo6g6
County Administrator
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (X) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/Richard No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) W. Robers to approve Alternative #1 Garrett x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
To Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Dale Castellow
Reta Busher
Diane Hyatt
John Hubbard
ACTION # A121388-12
ITEM NUMBER •�/ "" 7
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 13, 1988
AGENDA ITEM: Approval of Funding to Implement a 2+2 Program
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENT/S:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The County School Board of Roanoke County in cooperation
with Salem City, Roanoke City, and Botetourt County Schools, and
Virginia Western Community College has received approval from the
Virginia Department of Education to implement a 2+2 program in
automated manufacturing technology. The 2+2 program is a
coordinated effort between area high schools, community college,
and local businesses to establish a curriculum in automated
manufacturing technology (computer aided technologies) which
involves two years at the high school level and two years at the
community college level in order to obtain a four-year technician
certificate. The Virginia Department of Education will provide
$20,000 for the period of November 15, 1988 through November 18,
1989 and an additional $20,000 in the following year. These
funds will be used to do a needs assessment and write the
curriculum for this program.
FISCAL IMPACT:gP
$20,000 will be recorded as an additional revenue from the
State and allocated to the School Operating Fund. The phase II
funding of the second $20,000 will be budgeted in the School
Operating Fund for 1989-90.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends appropriating the $20,000 revenue and
related expenditure.
Respectfully submitted, Approved by,
Diane D. Hyatt Y Elmer C. Hodge
Director of Finance County Administrator
3_7
------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (X) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/Bob No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) L. Johnson to approve staff Garrett x
_
Received ( ) recommendation Johnson -=�.
Referred McGraw
To Nickens �—
Robers
cc: File
Diane Hyatt
Reta Busher
Dr. Bayes Wilson
PROJECT ABSTRACT Roanoke Area 2 +
TITLE OF PROPOSAL: A 2 + 2 Program in Automated Manufacturing
Technology
PROJECT DIRECTOR: Pen Helmandollar, Assistant Principal A.R.B.V.T.S.
CO-DIRECTOR: Wayne Michie, Chairman, Engineering/Industrial
Technologies Division, V.W.C.C.
INSTITUTION: Roanoke County Schools cooperating with Salem City,
Roanoke City and Botetour.t County Schools,
and Virginia Western Community College
LOCATION: Salem, Virginia and the .Roanoke area
FUNDING PERIOD: November 15, 1988 to November 15, 1990
OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT:
General objective
To plan, develop, implement, and evaluate a 2 + 2 program in Automated
Manufacturing Technology encompassing Virginia Western Community College,
Roanoke County Schools, Roanoke City Schools, Botetourt County Schools,
and Salem City Schools in an articulation effort with area business .and
industry.
Specific Objectives
1. To open the communication and articulation link between area
secondary vocational schools, the community college and the
business/industrial community and, further, to develop
partnerships with area LEA's, business, industry, community
college and government.
2. To select and implement a needs assessment procedure to assess the
needs ofarea industry so that a curriculum can be tailored to
Produce marketable outcomes.
3. To develop a curriculum framework and curriculum materials
necessary for the program.
4. To adopt procedures for program implementation.
5. To develop evaluation strategies, procedures and instruments to
assess the strengths and improve the weaknesses of the model..
6. To idint.ify 1nservice training needs of teachers and provide.
training resources.
,�D-7
2
7. To Prepare audiovisual materials for the orientation of educators,
students, parents. business/industry/government and the community.
8. To provide information to other localities planning or adopting
2. + 2. programs.
9. To provide information to the public about the program.
PROCEDURES OF IMPLEMENTATION:
NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND OCCUPATIONAL RESEARCH Conduct needs assessment
and curriculum development research through the Joint effort of the
L.E.A.'s. the community college, local business and industry and the
Department of Educational Research and Evaluation at Virginia Tech.
CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT Develop a 2 + 2 curriculum to prepare automated
manufacturing technicians based on the needs assessment survey and the
existing resources of the L.E.A.'s and the community college.
AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS AND PRESENTATIONS Develop two (2) videotape
Productions, a student recruitment brochure and presentation materials.
Present the program to school, community and industry.
EVALUATION Evaluate deliverables and process. Develop evaluation
instruments and procedures for implemented program.
CONTRIBUTIONS TO VOCATIONAL EDUCATION
Rapidly advancing computer assisted drafting and computer assisted
machinery have created a need for computer literate, trained machinists
capable of adapting to the ever-changing technology in both the machining
domain and in computer hardware and software. Students leaving the
educational setting equipped with knowledge and skills in working with
computer .assisted design and computer assisted machinery epitomize the
cutting edge of what up-to-date, skilled technicians are expected to be
capable of in order to parallel the state of the art in the tools of the
trade. To masterfutl.v operate within the complexities of this domain,
students must be equipped with a broad base of technical skills, math
ski.11f and computer skills as well as instruction in the principles that
govern technology. This base will ensure flexibility and adaptability to
the ever-changing world of technology, thereby ensuring that the
automated manufacturing technician will be an ever -progressing
contributor to the technological workforce. This program will
effectively Prepare students to attack this complex mixture of
adaptabtl.ity, knowledge, skills and problem solving strategies, through a
well conceived, co-ordinated curriculum developed with the cooperation of
.four secondary school systems encompassing 25 secondary and middle
schools, the community college and area business and industry.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO
THE SCHOOL OPERATING FUND FOR A 2 + 2 PROGRAM
IN AUTOMATED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY.
WHEREAS, the County School Board of Roanoke County, in
cooperation with Salem City, Roanoke City and Botetourt County
Schools, and Virginia Western Community College, has received
approval by the Virginia Department of Education to implement a 2
+ 2 Program in Automated Manufacturing Technology for the funding
period of November 15, 1988 to November 15, 1990, and
WHEREAS, the program has as its objectives
1. to open the communication and articulation link
between area secondary vocational schools, the
community college and the business/industrial
community and, further, to develop partnerships
with area LEA's, business, industry, community
college and government;
2. to select and implement a needs assessment
procedure to assess
the
needs of area
industry so
that a curriculum
can
be tailored
to produce
marketable outcomes;
3. to develop a curriculum framework and curriculum
materials necessary for the program;
4. to adopt procedures for program implemen,:ation;
5. to develop evaluation strategies, procedures and
instruments to assess the strengths and improve
the weaknesses of the model;
6. to identify inservice training needs of teachers
and provide training resources;
7. to prepare audiovisual materials for the
orientation of edLicators, students, parents,
i�us i ness�i ndust ry�<������rnment .111ci the commurri ty;
-2-
�:Z)
8. to provide information to other localities
planning or adopting 2 + 2 programs and to the
public, and
WHEREAS, the program will be fully funded by the
Virginia Department of Education;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County School
Board of Roanoke County on motion of Charlsie S. Pafford and duly
seconded, requests an appropriation of $20,000 to the School
Operating Fund for 1988-89 as phase one of the 2 + 2 Program in
Automated Manufacturing Technology. Phase two funding of $20,000
will be budgeted in the School Operating Fund for 1989-90.
Adopted on the following recorded vote:
AYES: Paul G. Black, Richard E. Cullinan, Charlsie S.
Pafford, Barbara B. Chewning, Frank E. Thomas
NAYS: None
TE'S TEr, �
--� Clerk
c: Mrs. Diane Hyatt
ACTION NO.A121388-13
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 13, 1988
AGENDA ITEM: Request to amend State Code regarding designation
of the Clerk to Board of Supervisors
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS :
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Virginia State Code, Section 15.1-117 outlines the duties of
County Administrator. Under this code section, known as the
County Administrator Act, the County Administrator assumes the
duties of Clerk to the Board of Supervisors in place of the Clerk
of Circuit Court. Exceptions to this statute must be authorized
by the General Assembly, either by amendment to the State Code or
changes to the form of government. For example, under the County
Manager, County Executive and Urban County manager forms, the
Board of Supervisors may appoint another person to serve as clerk
of the board. A further exception is provided for Chesterfield
County which allows any county with a population between 100,000
and 143,000 to appoint a clerk to the board other than the County
Administrator or Clerk of Circuit Court. All counties having
these exceptions are large urban or suburban counties similar to
Roanoke County.
In Roanoke County, the County Administrator is the Clerk to the
board, but many of the responsibilities have been delegated to a
Deputy Clerk since the mid 1970's.
Since Roanoke County is becoming an urban county, it would seem
logical that the responsibilities as Clerk to the Board should
officially be delegated to someone other than the County
Administrator. This change would more accurately reflect the
duties actually being performed by both the County Administrator
and Deputy Clerk.
In order to make this appointment, it will be necessary to
request that the General Assembly amend Code Section 15.1-117 to
allow Roanoke County to appoint a Clerk to the Board of
Supervisors other than the County Administrator
I
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the County Attorney be authorized to
include in the legislative package that the Code of Virginia
Section 15.1-117 be amended to allow Roanoke County to appoint a
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors other than the County
Administrator.
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Marr C'_ NjnkPnG/SfevPn Yes No Abs
Denied ( ) A- McGraw to ani rave staff Garrett x
Received ( ) rpnnmmPndation Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
To• Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Paul Mahoney
I
ACTION # A1.21388-14
ITEM NUNIRER M
AT A REGULAR MEE'r1NG OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 13, 1988
AGENDA ITEM: C. L. & 0. Investors v. Board of_Supervisors
COUNTY ADMTNISTRATOR'S
COMMENTS:
Board
of Supervisors votnd to (J( -n%, a
petition
r
is located at the intersection of
-i
Route 419, Cordell. Dri-vc,, and
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
On
June 14, 1-988, the
Board
of Supervisors votnd to (J( -n%, a
petition
to rezone 1.7 acres of land from R- L to B- L . t'h :, land
is located at the intersection of
-i
Route 419, Cordell. Dri-vc,, and
McVitty
Road. On July 13,
1-988,
the owner. of 1 -his hr_operty (C.
I- & O.
l.enq.ing
Investors) filed a
this denial.
Motion
for Declaratory Judgment. •::hal
On October 20, 1988, this case was tried in the Circuit
Court for the County of- Roanoke. By letter opinion da Led Novem-
ber 18, 1988, the Court found that upon the evidence present:c�d
the existing R-1 zoning is unreasonable and that the proposed B-1
zoning is reasonable.
This matter is referred back to the Board for such further
action as would permit the use of the property as propi_,sed by the
owner. No further public hearing on this matter .is necc•i;sary,
and any action must be taken by December 29, 1988. If the board
fails to act, then it shalt be enjoined from preventing thr! use
of the. property by the landowner/plaintiff for a 13-]- k,5e in
accordance with the rezoning petition.
FISCAL I MPAC'I'S : e
The Court ordered that= the landowner/plainti.ff rec(Dw(,r fro
the County its costs in the vn01_i11t of $36t,. 1.0. The !,,:)ar d mti::t
appropriate this sum from Board contingency for payment to thy,
plaintiff.
ALTERNATIVES:
1 . Rezone the property from IZ-- 1 to R-1 i n accordance with
the petition requesting such action, subject to the proferred
conditions:
-�.D-i
a. Property to be developed in substantial conformity
with the site plan prepared by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates,
Engineers & Surveyors, and Dickson Associates, Architects.
b. Signage is limited to 48 square feet and to be lo-
cated in one of the two locations identified on the site plan.
C. The property will be utilized for office use only.
No financial institution use in the form of tellers, drive -up
windows, or automatic tellers will be permitted on the property.
d. The property will. be constructed with frame con-
struction, masonry, and wood trim. The structures will not be
more than two (2) stories in height and will have a sloped roof.
e. That the berm existing on McVitty Road w.i.11 be re-
tained with the exception of the entrances to the property.
f. That all outside utilities constructed by developer
will be underground.
g. The radius for access entrances, and if approved by
the Virginia Department of Transportation, will be widened.
h. All site and parking area lighting to be directed
away from residential area and from 419. Lighting standards wall_
not be more than fourteen (14) feet in height and power will not
exceed one foot candle.
i. The dumpster will be screened from 419 and Crest -
hill Drive.
2. Do not rezone the property. If no action is taken, then
a permanent injunction will be effective enjoining the Board from
preventing the use of the property in accordance with the rezon-
ing request for the B-1 use.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board favorably consider the adop-
tion of Alternative 1 and appropriate the sum of $365.10 for
costs.
Respectfully submitted,
ryPaul M. Mahoney —tib
County Attorney
.2) -/o
-----------------------------------------------------------------
AC`I' I ON VOTE.
Approved ( x) Motion by:-.-S-ub_s-titute-_MQ±i-on_-by No Yes Alis
I)oniod ( ) Steven A- McGraw RicharA U`�- __ Garrett x
Received ( ) Rapers to ,apprjave_Alternative _
Johnson �c
Referred1 McGraw x
- N ickens --
-- ---- - — Robers x - --
cc : `*,File"
Paul Mahoney
Reta Busher
Diane Hyatt
ACTION NUMBER A121388-15
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 13, 1988
SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
1. Community Corrections Resources Board
One-year term of Edmund J. Kielty, Alternate. His term expired
August 13, 1988.
2. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family
Advisory Board
County Attorney Paul Mahoney has received a response from Michael
Lazzuri, Director of Court Services, regarding the above Board.
A copy of the letter is attached.
He has invited Mr. Lazzuri to attend the meeting on December 13,
1988 to discuss the future activity of the committee.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY:
`'.raA-41-- _-jv Ic )�
Mary H. Allen -Elmer. C.. Hodge
Deputy Clerk County Administrator
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Harry N; k ns/Steven Yes No Abs
Denied ( ) A. McCraw to continup Board and Garrett x
Received ( ) appoint new members Johnson —R -
Referred McGraw
To: Nickens �-
Robers -�
cc: File
Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth & Family Advisory Board File
Michael Lazzuri
Paul Mahoney
MICHAEL J. LAZZURI Department of Corrections SERVING.
DIRECTOR OF COURT SERVICES
DAVID W. DAVIS. II Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court COUNTY OF ROANOKE
W. FREDRICK FOX(703) 387.6123
Service Unit
SUPERVISORS CITY OF SALEM
Twenty-third Judicial District (703)375.3046
305 E. Main Street — Salem, VA 24153
November 9, 1988
Mr. Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
County of Roanoke, Virginia
P.O. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
Dear Mr. Mahoney:
I am writing in response to your letter of October 27, 1988 regarding the Court
Service Unit Advisory Council. As we have discussed in the past, The Advisory
Council's work has been very beneficial to us until recent times. According to my
records the last meeting of the Advisory Council was March of 1987. The Council
has always been a group who feels that unless there is a purpose to meeting that
meetings should not be held for meeting sake.
The Advisory Council was very instrumental in helping us obtain concessions from
the Commonwealth of Virginia during our early stages of development as a state
operated Court Service Unit. It has given me valued input on different projects
that we have attempted or implimented in this office. The continuation of the
Advisory Council may be benificial in the future, particularly with the anticipated
separation of the Division of Youth Services from the Virginia Department of
Corrections. An active Advisory Council may have some input in the design of a
new Department of Youth Services and in the type of services that would be
available to the community from the new department.
There have been reasons why the Advisory Council has not chosen to meet.
Primary among these is the lack of agenda items. The Council has been dependent
upon me to devise an agenda for its meetings and to develop subject matters to be
discussed. I have not been very active in that area as many of the decisions that
make cannot wait until the Advisory Council meets. The members of the Advisory
Council have not developed agendas of their own and have not been utilized to
their full potential. The size of the Council itself seems to be somewhat of a
problem in establishing meeting dates because of personal or professional
commitments of the Coucil members to other organizations or individuals. We have
combined the Council established in Roanoke County with that of a similar Council
(7.:? -z
formed by the City of Salem. Another factor that
has diminished
the
importance of
the Advisory Council on the local level is the lack
of activity on
the
part of the
Advisory Council to the Division of Youth Services
which operates
on
a state level.
As you may be aware from recent news paper accounts, the Department of
Corrections has not named a new Deputy Director to head the Division of Youth
Services in over a year. The acting Deputy Director not only has to fill the role
as head of the divisionbut also has to continue the work of his own position within
the department. Because of a long illness prior to his death, the former Deputy
Director of the Department of Corrections for the Division of Youth Services had
not called a meeting of the State Council since February of 1987. As one of only
nine local Advisory Councils we had a seat on the State Advisory Council and had
the potential for significant input at the State level. If the Council is continued
and the State Council is reactivated, I anticipate that we would again be in a
position of being able to have significant input into the activities of the Division or
new Department.
In its role as the Advisory Council for the Court Service Unit the Council also
maintains a checking account which has accrued from donations from private civic
organizations for the Outdoor Adventure Education Program which we have operated.
The Court Service Unit itself cannot hold funds which have been donated for its
use. The Advisory Council has acted as an independent group to hold these funds
and disperse them as needed.
Perhaps the Advisory Council should be retained but redesigned. The role of the
Advisory Council could be .expanded to act as an Advisory Council on youth and
should involve not only the activities of the Court Service Unit but also youth
related activities of other departments within the county government structure. As
a suggestion, these other departments could include Youth Haven II, the Department
of Social Services, the Department of Parks Ei Recreation, the Roanoke County
School System, and perhaps even the Health Department. This restructuring of the
purpose of the Advisory Council would give it a more comprehensive approach to
meeting the needs of the youth in the County but also would give it a broad
agenda base and more purpose for its existance.
I would be happy to meet with you to discuss the content of this letter and if the
Board feels that it is necessary for me to appear on December 13, at 3:00 p.m. I
will be glad to do so. In the mean time I will call for a meeting of the Advisory
Council to consider its role and how it feels about the proposal offered in this
letter.
Very truly yours,
Michael J. Lazzuri
Director of Court Services
M JL/vb
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 1988
RESOLUTION NO. 121388-16 APPROVING
AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET
FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS
ITEM I - CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain section of the agenda of the
Board of Supervisors for December 13, 1988, designated as Item I
- Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as
to each item separately set forth in said section designated
Items 1 through 10, inclusive, as follows:
1.
Confirmation of appointments to the
Mental Health
Services
of the Roanoke Valley Board of
Directors
2.
Request
for Bingo Permit from the
Vinton Moose
Lodge.
3.
Request
for Bingo Permit from the Fort Lewis
Rescue Squad.
4.
Addition
to VDOT Secondary System of
0.55 miles of
Airpoint
Drive/Airpoint Road.
5. Appropriation of funds for drug enforcement
activities
6. Approval of contract between Youth Haven II and
Virginia Department of Social Services.
7. Authorization to transfer Vinton Recreation Center
to Town of Vinton.
8. Request- for- Binge- Permit- fres- the- Moose- Badge
284
9. Authorization to amend the 1988 Holiday Schedule.
10. Request- from- Marie- Mitehell- to- waive- the- water
ordinanee-
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens with Items 8 and 10
removed for discussion and a separate vote; seconded by
Supervisor Johnson and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TEST:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
12/15/88
CC: Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering
Sheriff Michael Kavanaugh
Bev Waldo, Youth Haven II Director
Stephen Carpenter, Director of Parks and Recreation
D. Keith Cook, Director of Human Resources
Clifford Craig, Utility Director
John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
File
A121388 -16.a
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE December 13, 1988
SUBJECT: Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Mental
Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Board of Directors
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The following nominations were made at the previous board meeting
and must now be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. The
nominee has agreed to serve.
Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley
Board of Directors
Rita Gliniecki has been nominated by Supervisor Robers to serve
a three-year term as a County appointee. The term will expire on
December 31, 1991.
SUBMITTED BY:
Mary H. Allen
Deputy Clerk
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/Boh T. Yes No Abs
Denied ( ) Johnson Garrett �—
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
To: Nickens
Robers
cc: File
Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Board of Directors File
ACTION NO. A121388 -16.b
ITEM NUMBER --Z
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 13, 1988
AGENDA ITEM: Request for Bingo Permit from the Vinton Moose Lodge
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
The Vinton Moose Lodge has applied for a Bingo permit for 1989.
They have paid the $25.00 fee.
The application has been reviewed by R. Wayne Compton,
Commissioner of the Revenue, and he recommends approval.
Mary H. Allen
Deputy Clerk
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
------------------------------------ --------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/Bob L. Yes No Abs
Denied ( ) Johnson Garrett x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
To: Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Bingo/Raffle File
ACTION NO. A121388 -16.c
ITEM NUMBER. -Z'-3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 13, 1988
AGENDA ITEM: Request for Bingo Permit from the Fort Lewis Rescue
Squad, Inc.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
The Fort Lewis Rescue Squad has applied for a Bingo permit for
1989. They have paid the $25.00 fee.
The application has been reviewed by R. Wayne Compton,
Commissioner of the Revenue, and he recommends approval.
Mary H. Allen
Deputy Clerk
Z -1-Z-111
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
------------------=-------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C'_ Nir-kana/gnh_ Yes No Abs
Denied ( ) L. Johnson Garrett v
Received ( ) Johnson _x
Referred McGraw x
To: Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Bingo/Raffle File
ACTION NO. A121388 -16.d
ITEM NUMBER -r
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 13, 1988
AGENDA ITEM: Addition to Va. Department of Transportation
Secondary System
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Roanoke County has received notification from the Virginia
Department of Transportation that 0.55 miles of Airpoint
Drive/Airpoint Road has been accepted into the Secondary System
effective November 22, 1988.
Mary H. Allen
Deputy Clerk
�z 1044
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (K) Motion by: HarrT NickAns/Aoki Yes No Abs
Denied ( ) L. Johnson Garrett _x
Received ( ) Johnson.
Referred McGraw —x
To: Nickens —x
Robers —x
cc: File
Phillip Henry
NOV 2 8 1988
COMMONWEALTH LTH ®f VIRGINIA
RAY D. PETHTEL
COMMISSIONER
Board of Supervisors
County of Roanoke
P. 0. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018
MEMBERS OF THE BOARD:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1401 EAST BROAD STREET
RICHMOND, 23219
November 22, 1988
Secondary System
Addition
Roanoke County
Revenue Sharing
__r -- J-/
OSCAR K. MABRY
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
As requested in your resolution dated April 26, 1988, the
following addition to the Secondary System of Roanoke County is
hereby approved, effective November 22, 1988.
ADDITION
LENGTH
Route 1445 (Airpoint Drive/Airpoint Road) - From
Route 221 to 0.55 mile East Route 221. 0.55 Mi.
Sincerely,
3Z
Oscar K. Mabry
Deputy Commissioner
�;1'=;';i'11R1ATION
1OIA IIs€ r;l C'_hJTUHY
A121388 -16.e
ACTION NUMBER
ITEM NUMBER -Zr`-5'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 13, 1988
AGENDA ITEM: Request for appropriation of funds for drug
enforcement activities
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY_OF INFORMATION
Sheriff Kavanaugh has collected $7450 from merchants throughout
the County for use in drug enforcement activities. In order for
the Sheriff to expend the funds, it must be appropriated by the
Board of Supervisors. Appropriation of these funds would not
require additional personnel or vehicles.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the appropriation of the funds to the Sheriff
for use in drug enforcement activities.
Elmer C. Hodg
County Administrator
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/Bob Yes No Abs
Denied ( ) L. Johnson Garrett x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
To: Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Reta Busher
Diane Hyatt
Sheriff Kavanaugh
ACTION # A121388 -16.f
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 13, 1988
AGENDA ITEM: Request for Approval of a Contract between Youth
Haven II and the Commonwealth of Virginia,
Department of Social Services concerning Vendor
Status
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS.-
BACKGROUND:
OMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
For several months, employees of Youth Haven II and the
Department of Human Services have been negotiating with the
Department of Social Services to establish Youth Haven II as a
recognized vendor to provide services for adolescents in the
Roanoke Valley and surrounding areas. The designation as an
approved vendor is necessary to be eligible to receive Title XX
monies for payment of services from a participating jurisdiction
and also to establish a per diem rate to be charged to any other
outside party who may place a child at the facility for
treatment.
On November 17, 1988, Youth Haven II was notified of its
approval as a Title XX vendor by the Commonwealth of Virginia,
Department of Social Services, and thereby requests permission
for the County Administrator to execute said contract documents
after approval by the County Attorney.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS:
Alternative #1: Approve the designation as a Title XX
vendor and authorize the County Administrator to execute
appropriate contract documents. This would establish the per
diem rate (recovery of local costs) at a rate of $34.55 per day
through the period ending June 30, 1990.
Alternative #2: Do not accept the designation as Title XX
vendor, which could result in a reduced amount of reimbursement
from participating parties, thereby, causing a larger net cost to
Roanoke County.
FISCAL IMPACT:e
Approval of this contract and acceptance of the Title XX
vendor designation could result in net annual savings to the
County of Roanoke for participants in the program from outside of
Roanoke County, by establishing uniform per diem rates, which are
eligible for reimbursement through the State Department of Social
Services monies (Title XX). This designation would also allow
the Youth Haven II program to accept participants from any of the
surrounding counties on a reimbursement basis, which likewise,
could reduce our local effort in this program.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Alternative I be approved, authorizing
the County Administrator to execute appropriate contract
documents after approval by the County Attorney.
Respectfully submitted,
Approved by,
j John M. Chambliss, Jr Elmer C. Ho ge
Assistant Administrator County Administrator
Approved
Denied
Received
Referred
To
ACTION
k ) Motion by: Harry C'_ Nickens!
( ) _Bob L. Johnson
JMC/cw
cc: Paul Mahoney
Bev Waldo
Betty Lucas
File
John Chambliss
Reta Busher
Diane Hyatt
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers _�_
ACTiON # Aizi-jbb—ib.
ITEM NUMBER -r- 7
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 13, 1988
AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to Transfer the Vinton Recreation
Center to the Town of Vinton
COUNTY ADMINISTR TOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND: a0
Effective February 1, 1989, the County of Roanoke's Parks &
Recreation Department would like to cease its operations at the
Vinton Recreation Center and move the normal scheduled
programming to the Craig Avenue Center. The Town of Vinton has
expressed a desire to use the Vinton Recreation Center and has
agreed to allow the Senior Citizens to continue meeting there.
The Vinton Recreation Center (building) is owned by the Town
of Vinton. Through a lease dated May 3, 1982, the County of
Roanoke (Department of Parks & Recreation) is responsible for the
programming and routine maintenance of the facility. Section 7
of the lease agreement requires the County to notify the Town
Manager of any intention to terminate the lease or to cease the
use of the buildings. We request permission for the County
Administrator to make known this desire to the Town Manager.
The Department of Parks & Recreation has also arranged with
the School Administration to be able to use the gymnasium
facility only, at the old William Byrd Intermediate School. The
savings from the utilities and maintenance costs at the Vinton
Recreation Center will be used to offset any expenses incurred
for utilities and maintenance at the gymnasium site. The use of
this gymnasium is required to fulfill the programming needs in
the Vinton area, particularly since the gymnasium .at the Mt.
Pleasant Elementary School is not usable for competitive
programming because of problems with the floor surface.
ALTERNTIVES AND IMPACT:
FISCAL IMPACT:
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the County Administrator be authorized
to notify the Town Manager of the County of Roanoke's intent to
cease programming at the Vinton Recreation Center, effective
February 1, 1989, thereby allowing the Town of Vinton to utilize
and maintain said facility.
Respectfully Submitted:
John M. Chambliss, Jr.
Assistant Administrator
Approved By:
d", 4 -XI,
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (X) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/Bob No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) L. Johnson Garrett x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
To Nickens x
Robers x
cc: Steve Carpenter
Gardner Smith
File
John Chambliss
A121388 -16.h
ITEM NUMBER -Z- 9
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 13, 1988
SUBJECT: Approval to amend the 1988 holiday schedule
COUNTY
ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
On January 12, 1988, the Board of Supervisors established
the 1988 holiday schedule. At that time the Board also
authorized county offices to close on any day appointed by the
Board of Supervisors or the Governor of Virginia for state or
county offices to close.
Governor Gerald L. Baliles has authorized two additional
half-day holidays for state employees in the executive branch.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board authorize two additional
half-day holidays in accordance with the decision of the Board of
Supervisors on January 12, 1988, to honor in Roanoke County any
closings or legal holidays designated by the state, and that
county offices be closed on Friday, December 23, and Friday,
December 30, at 12 Noon.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY:
D. K. Cook
Director of Human Resources
9C W
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Bob L. Johnson Garrett x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
To Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
D. Keith Cook
CHONG M. PAK
DIRECTOR
November 15, 1988
MEMORANDUM
TO: All State Agency Heads
FROM: Chong M. Pak 6��F
SUBJECT: 1988 Yuletide Holiday Schedule
State agencies will be closed Monday, December -26, in obser-
vance of the Christmas holiday and Monday, January 2, in ob-
servance of -the New Year's holiday. Governor Gerald L.
Baliles has authorized full-time classified employees in the
Executive Branch two additional half day holidays as follows:
four work hours on Friday, December 23, and four work hours
on Friday, December 30. Classified part-time employees may
be excused.the proportionate number of hours they are sche-
duled to work. ,
Necessary services throughout the Commonwealth will be main-
tained. Employees who are required to work on the days spe-
cified above are eligible for compensatory leave in accor-
dance with Rule 9.2 of the "Rules for the Administration of
the Virginia Personnel Act."
Please take an opportunity, on behalf of the Governor, to
wish your employees a happy holiday season and extend his
thanks for their service to the Commonwealth.
cc: Governor Gerald L. Baliles
The Honorable Carolyn J. Moss
Agency Human Resources Officers
NOV 22 198p
Ru��rjhe c5c :n'
Dept, of S,, dul Sc -it rc
ACTION NO. A121388-17
ITEM NUMBER --r-0
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 13, 1988
AGENDA ITEM: Request for Bingo Permit from the Loyal Order of
Moose Lodge 284
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
The Loyal Order of Moose Lodge 284 has applied for a Bingo permit
for 1989. They have paid the $25.00 fee.
The application has been reviewed by R. Wayne Compton,
Commissioner of the Revenue, and he recommends approval.
Mary H. Allen
Deputy Clerk
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
---------------------------------------------------------------_-----------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (X) Motion by: Rob T- Jnhnsnn/Harr Yes No Abstain
Denied ( ) C. Nickens Garrett x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
To: Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Bingo/Raffle File
A121388-18
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER -C- J d
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December'13, 1988
AGENDA ITEM: Request of Marie M. Mitchell for waiver of
Water Ordinance Provision
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
xr
BACKGROUND:
Mrs. Mitchell lives in a rural farmhouse located on a 100
acre tract of land off Franklin Street adjacent to the Salem city
line. The spring which furnished water to this house has become
contaminated and can not be used for a water supply. Mrs.
Mitchell has requested a connection to the public water line
located on Franklin Street approximately 1300 feet from the
house.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The water connection requested would require the
installation of a private lateral within a private easement
instead of extension of the public water line along Franklin
Street as required by the water ordinance. Mrs. Mitchell stated
that the required water line extension or alternate lateral
connection on Bentridge Lane was prohibitively expensive. The
water ordinance provides that the Board of Supervisors may waive
the provision that requires expansion or extension of the water
system.
Mrs. Mitchell feels that not being able to use the service
lateral to supply water to her home causes her great hardship.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS:)
1. The Board of Supervisors would waive the provision of the
ordinance concerning expansion of a water system.
This alternative would recognize the emergency situation
that exists and permit a service lateral to be installed within a
private easement in lieu of extending the public water system.
1
.r -/o
2. The Board of Supervisors would not waive the provision of the
ordinance concerning expansion of a water system.
This alternative would require Mrs. Mitchell to either
extend the public water line to her property at an additional
cost of approximately $8,000 or connect to the water line on
Bentridge Lane', which would cost approximately $1,000 more than
the connection requested.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative number 1 with the following
conditions:
1. The applicant agrees that the County is only responsible for
water pressure and water quality to the water meter.
2. The applicant agrees to pay for all water passing through the
meter whether used or not. No credit will be given for water
lost due to leaks in the 1300 foot private lateral.
3. If at any time in the future, any portion of this 100 acre
tract is subdivided, sold, or transferred, the existing private
service lateral connection must be abandoned and water service
provided as required by the ordinance.
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED:
Cliffo raig, Elmer C. Hodge
Utility Director County Administrator
---------------------------------------
AC TION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Richard W. Robers/
Denied ( ) Steven A. c No Yes Abs
Received
Garrett x
( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw —�
to Nickens ---x-
Robers
cc: File
Cliff Craig
Phillip Henry
PA
01% 10:10
2
` House
1 /
t _ J
Water Service
Connection
I— — — — — — — ---
o'O 6602-1-3
1'. 200'
NORTH
I
i'2 AC
�t
3
yq AC CI
2
4
Sinch,
water .
line
UU
/ \ J
/ 10
II
K
COMMUNITY SERVICES Request of Marie Mitchell for waiver of
AND DEVELOPMENT Water Ordinance Provision
A121388-19
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 13, 1988
AGENDA ITEM: LIBRARY AUTOMATION - STATUS REPORT
COUNTY MINISTRATORS COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
Staff from the Roanoke County Library and Department of
Management Information Systems have met with their counterparts
from the City of Roanoke and City of Salem for the past several
months to consider a valleywide library automation system. The
attached joint report (addendum A) will be presented to each of
the governing bodies during December 1988 as a status report on
the progress of this project and to provide some planning
information for inclusion in the normal budget process.
The City of Roanoke retained the services of a consultant to
assist in the development of specifications and the evaluation
process for the project. The scope of services included the
development of a system for the City of Roanoke only or a shared
system for the City and/or the City of Salem , Roanoke County or
both. The estimates of cost are based on a Request for
Information submitted for this project and an evaluation of eight
responses. Attachment B contains estimates for providing a
separate library -automation system using the County's Hewlett
Packard computer system. Based on the results of the
consultant's bidding process, this concept (use of the County's
computer) could be expanded to consider wider sharing of costs
and benefits.
The bidding process has been scheduled by the City of Roanoke to
allow the evaluation of the bids and provide pertinent cost
estimates, which can be included in the budget process for the
1989-90 fiscal year. Staff is seeking permission to continue
with the study, through the bidding process, without a financial
committment at this time. If the results of the joint bidding
process are favorable, the County may consider including monies
in the 1989-90 budget for its share of the costs. If the results
are not favorable, the County could consider alternate proposals
such as a package for the County only (using our own computer
system), which could be accomplished on the same timetable or at
a later date.
Library operations are labor intensive and the current staffing
levels are necessary to provide minimum staffing for the hours of
service. Automation will reduce many of the clerical tasks
K_�
currently being performed by staff, thus allowing them more time
to assist patrons. Automation will also reduce the need to
increase staffing for the foreseeable future, assuming the same
number of facilities and hours of operation.
The valleywide shared system offers many benefits to the patrons
including improved research capabilities, faster response, and
the ability to reserve books from any of the valley library
facilities, and serves as an expansion of the Valleywid e Library
Card program. Use of a separate system would likely defeat the
success of the card program, even though some of the other labor
saving capabilities would be gained.
If a Valleywide Shared Library Automation System is chosen as the
appropriate course of action, a cooperative agreement must be
negotiated to cover the governance of the system, ownership, and
cost allocation. This agreement should be developed based upon
the number of participants and the relative impact on the entire
system. (l�
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS
Alternative #1: Allow staff to continue its study of a
shared library automation system through the bidding process
without a financial committment at this time. If the bids are
favorable, funds could be considered in the 1989-90 budget
process to allow the County's participation.
Alternative #2: Do not allow the County staff to continue
participation in the shared library automation system study.
Future study of our own automated system could be included in the
budgetary process for consideration on its own merits.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Roanoke County Library Board and staff recommends Alternative
#1 with the results of the joint -bidding process being brought
back to the Board of Supervisors for consideration during the
normal budget process.
SUBMITTED BY:
/X
%Tohn M. Chambliss, Jr.
Assistant County Administrator
Human Services
APPROVED:
Y� _Y2 ?(Z2
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
--- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ACTION
- - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
VOTE
- - - - -
Approved ( )
Motion by Bob L. Johnson/Steven
No Yes
Abs
Denied (x)
A. McGraw to continue to
Garrett
x
Received ( )
1/10/88 meeting
Johnson
x
Referred ( )
McGraw
x
To
Nickens
x
Robers
x
cc George Garretson
Don Myers
File
John Chambliss
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approved X
Motion by Steven A. McGraw/
Garrett
No
Richard W. Robers to approve
Johnson
Yes
Alternative #1
McGraw
Yes
Nickens
No
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robers
Yes
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 1988
RESOLUTION 121388-20 CONCURRING IN THE
TEMPORARY CLOSING OF STARKEY ROAD (STATE
ROUTE 904) AND PENN FOREST BOULEVARD
(STATE ROUTE 897) FOR A CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT BY THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
WHEREAS, Starkey Road (State Route 904) Project No.
0904-080-215-0501 is proposed to be constructed by the Virginia
Department of Transportation from its intersection with Penn
Forest Boulevard (State Route 897) to its intersection with
Electric Road (State Route 419); and
WHEREAS, Penn Forest Boulevard (State Route 897) is
proposed to be constructed as a part of the same project by the
Virginia Department of Transportation from its intersection with
Starkey Road (State Route 904) to its intersection with Chaparral
Drive (State Route 800); and
WHEREAS, Starkey Road provides an urban highway link to
commercial properties in Roanoke County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That said Board does hereby concur in the closing
of the following routes as a result of Project No.
0904-080-215-0501 by the Virginia Department of Transportation
for a period of approximately thirty (30) days each:
Starkey Road (State Route 904) from the intersection
of Penn Forest (State Route 897) to the intersection
of Electric Road (Route 419)
Penn Forest Boulevard (Route 897) from the
intersection of Starkey Road (State Route 904) to the
intersection of Chaparral Drive (State Route 800).
2. That the Deputy Clerk of the Board is hereby
directed to deliver a certified copy of this resolution to the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Robers, seconded by Supervisor
Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections, and
copy for Virginia Department of Transportation