Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3/27/2012 - Regularr� Z cia MN r Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Agenda March 27, 2012 Good afternoon and welcome to our meeting for March 27, 2012. Regular meetings are held on the second and fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Thursday at 7:00 p.m. and on Saturday at 4:00 p.m. Board of Supervisors meetings can also be viewed online through Roanoke County's website at www.RoanokeCountyVA.gov. Our meetings are now closed- captioned, so it is important for everyone to speak directly into the microphones at the podium. Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772 -2005 at least 48 hours in advance. Please turn all cell phones off or place on silent. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 p.m.) 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation: Dr. Eric Spano Mount Pleasant Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of congratulations to the Hidden Valley High School Boys Swim Team 200 Medley Relay for winning the 2012 Virginia High School League (VHSL) State Group A/AA Championship Page 1 of 5 2. Certificate of recognition to Carolyn Bethel, Hidden Valley High School, 2012 Virginia High School League (VHSL) State Champion in Indoor Track; Girls 1600 Meter Race and Second in the 3200 Meter Race 3. Recognition of Department of Social Services Employee, Robin Freeman, recipient of the 2012 recipient of the Gold Halo Award (Joyce Earl, Director of Social services) D. BRIEFINGS E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution approving the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Budget for fiscal year 2012 -2013 (Diane D. Hyatt, Assistant County Administrator; Jacqueline Shuck, Executive Director of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission) 2. Resolution setting the allocation percentage for personal property tax relief for the 2012 tax year (Laurie Gearheart, Assistant Director of Finance) 3. Resolution granting a waiver to the American Cancer Society and Relay for Life of Vinton under Section 13 -23 of the Roanoke County Code to the provisions of the County's Noise Ordinance, Article II. Noise of Chapter 13. Offenses - Miscellaneous (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) 4. Request for approval of agreements between the County of Roanoke and the Western Virginia Water Authority for use of space on tower sites for meter reading radio equipment (Anne Marie Green, Director of General Services) 5. Resolution adopting a revised schedule of ambulance transport fees and providing for an effective date (Richard E. Burch, Jr., Chief of Fire and Rescue) 6. Resolution authorizing the lease financing of certain fire rescue vehicles in an amount not to exceed $1.6 million (Richard E. Burch, Jr., Chief of Fire and Rescue; Rebecca Owens, Director of Finance) F. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the granting of a temporary construction easement and a permanent easement to Appalachian Power Company on property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors known as Leslie Lane (tax map # 077.15 -01- 11.00), Cave Spring Magisterial District (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) Page 2 of 5 G. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending Section 23 -3.4. "Stormwater management facility maintenance agreements" of Chapter 23. "Stormwater Management" of the Roanoke County Code (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) H. APPOINTMENTS 1. Board of Zoning Appeals (appointed by District) 2. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Review Committee (appointed by District) 3. Roanoke County Community Leaders Environmental Action Roundtable (RCCLEAR) I. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY 1. Approval of minutes — February 14, 2012; February 28, 2012 2. Confirmation of appointments to the Building Code Board of Adjustments (Fire Code Board of Appeals) (appointed at large); Economic Development Authority (appointed at large) 3. Resolution dedicating as right -of -way for public use a portion of property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, tax parcel #038.16 -01- 01 4. Resolution requesting acceptance of Castle View Court into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System J. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS K. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS L. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS M. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance Page 3of5 2. Capital Reserves 3. Reserve for Board Contingency 4. Treasurer's Statement of Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy as of February 29, 2012 5. Statement of Budgeted and Actual Revenues as of February 29, 2012 6. Statement of Budgeted and Actual Expenditures and Encumbrances as of February 29, 2012 7. Accounts Paid — February 2012 N. WORK SESSIONS 1. Work session to discuss fiscal year 2012 -2013 budget development (W. Brent Robertson, Director of Management and Budget) a. Discussion of departmental budget cuts and service delivery impacts as presented to the Board on March 13, 2012 b. Discussion of implementation of Senate Bill 497 — passing along the five percent (5 %) employee contribution to Plan 1 employees 2. Work session to review Roanoke County debt (Rebecca Owens, Director of Finance; Laurie Gearheart, Assistant Director of Finance) EVENING SESSION O. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Public hearings for citizen comment on the following items: (W. Brent Robertson, Director of Management and Budget) (a) Real estate, personal property and machinery and tools tax rates (b) General comment on the upcoming annual budget for fiscal year 2012- 2013 Page 4 of 5 2. Request to adopt the following tax rates for calendar year 2013: (W. Brent Robertson, Director of Management and Budget) (a) Real estate tax rate of $1.09 per $100 assessed valuation (b) Personal property tax rate of $3.50 per $100 assessed valuation (c) Machinery and tools tax rate of $3.00 per $100 assessed valuation P. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. The petition of the Western Virginia Water Authority to obtain a Special Use Permit for a major utility service in an R -1, Low Density Residential, District. The major utility service involves the construction of a standpipe water tank approximately 102 feet in height on 0.51 acre, located at 4968 Northridge Lane, Catawba Magisterial District (Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning) 2. The petition of the Western Virginia Water Authority to obtain a Special Use Permit for a broadcasting tower approximately 120 feet in height in an AG -3, Agricultural /Rural Preserve, District on 0.121 acre, located at 2857 Summit Ridge Road, Hollins Magisterial District (Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning) Q. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS R. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 1. Michael W. Altizer 2. Joseph B. "Butch" Church 3. Eddie "Ed" Elswick 4. Charlotte A. Moore 5. Richard C. Flora S. ADJOURNMENT TO A SPECIAL WORK SESSION ON TUESDAY, APRIL 3, 2012 AT 6:00 P.M. ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, FOURTH FLOOR TRAINING ROOM, 5204 BERNARD DRIVE, ROANOKE, VA Page 5 of 5 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. C -1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: March 27, 2012 Resolution of congratulations to the Hidden Valley High School Boys Swim Team 200 Medley Relay for winning the 2072 Virginia High School League (VHSL) State Group A/AA Championship Deborah C. Jacks Clerk to the Board of Supervisors B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY of INFORMATION: The Hidden Valley High School Boys Swim Team 200 Medley Relay won the 2012 VHSL State Group A/AA Championship on February 11, 2012, at the Christiansburg Aquatic Center with a time of 1:37.80. This is Hidden Valley High School's third State championship in the 200 Medley Relay. Coach Sheri Vaughn is expected to attend to accept the resolution, as well as members of the team and their families. The School Board members and Dr. Lorraine Lange, School Superintendent, have also been invited to attend. Page 1 of 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OR ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2012 RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO THE HIDDEN VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL BOYS SWIM TEAM 200 MEDLEY RELAY FOR WINNING THE 2012 VIRGINIA HIGH SCHOOL LEAGUE (VHSL) STATE GROUP A/AA CHAMPIONSHIP WHEREAS, team sports are an important part of the curriculum at schools in Roanoke County teaching cooperation, sportsmanship and athletic skill; and WHEREAS, the Hidden Valley High School Boys Swim Team 200 Medley Relay won the 2011 Virginia High School League State Group A/AA Championship on February 11, 2012, at the Christiansburg Aquatic Center with a time of 1:37.80; and WHEREAS, this is the third consecutive Titan boys State championship for the 200 Medley Relay Team; and WHEREAS, the Titans are coached by Sheri Vaughn. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to the members of the HIDDEN VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL BOYS 200 MEDLEY RELAY SWIM TEAM: Lucas Otruba; Peter D'Ortenzio, Jacob Gibbs and Ben Schmidt for winning the 2012 VHSL State Group A/AA Championship; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to the members of the team, the coaches and the school in their future endeavors. Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. C -2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: March 27, 2012 Certificate of recognition to Carolyn Bethel, Hidden Valley High School, 2012 Virginia High School League (VHSL) State Champion in Indoor Track; Girls 1 500 Meter Race and Second in the 3200 Meter Race Deborah C. Jacks Clerk to the Board of Supervisors APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Carolyn Bethel, a junior at Hidden Valley High School, won the 2012 Virginia State Championship in Indoor Track in the Girls 1500 Meter Race and came in second in the 3200 meter Race at Liberty University on February 25, 2012. Ms. Bethel won the 1500 with a time of 4:54.80 and came in second in the 3200 with atime of 11 :08.42. Ms. Bethel, her family and Coach Daniel King have been invited to attend the meeting. The School Board members and Dr. Lorraine Lange, School Superintendent, have also been invited to attend. Page 1 of 1 Aikh- l Egli CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION AWED TO Carolyn B for winnin the Girls 1600 VHSL State Group AA Indoor Track Competition Carol Bethel, a junior at Hidden Valle Hi School, won the 2012 Vir State Hi School Lea (VHSL) State Championship in the Girls 1600 Indoor Track Competition at Libert Universit on Februar 25, 2012. Ms. Bethel won the 1 meter race with a time of 4:54.80 and came in second in the 3200 meter race with a time of 11:08.42. The Board of Supervisors con Carol Bethel upon her achievements and expresses its best wishes for success in her future endeavors at Hidden Valle Hi School. Presented this 27'x' da of March 2012 Richard C. Flora, Chairman 4� u - 244 2� Michael W. Altizer, Vice Qfiairman 0 h B. "Butch" Church JP 1 Eddie "Ed" Elswick Charlotte M. Moore ACTION NO. ITEM NO. C -3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: March 27, 2012 Recognition of Department of Social Services employee, Robin Freeman, recipient of the 2012 Gold Halo Award Joyce Earl Director of Social Services. B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 6 Robin Freeman, social worker with the Department of Social Services (DSS), has been selected as this year's recipient of the Golden Halo Award in the Child Protective Services category. This makes the third consecutive year that a Roanoke County DSS Child Protective Services social worker has won the award. The Golden Halo awards were created in 2008 to recognize and honor outstanding contributions to the cause of child abuse prevention, intervention and advocacy in the Roanoke Valley by - the Children's Trust. Annually they honor individuals in the following categories: • Educator • Legal /Judicial • Child Protective Services • Medical Professional • Mental Health • Law Enforcement • Community Volunteer • Foster Parent • Guardian Angel Nominations are submitted and a selection committee chooses the award winners who are recognized and honored at reception. The year the benefit reception will be held on April 5th at the Jefferson center. Page 1 of 2 The Department is very proud that Robin Freeman is' being recognized by the children's Trust for the work that she does in child protective services. Page 2 of 2 GII[a■ ■i ITEM NO. E -1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: March 27, 2012 Resolution approving the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Budget for fiscal year 201 2 -2013 Diane D. Hyatt Assistant County Administrator B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke Regional Airport Commission is required to submit their budget to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and the Roanoke City Council for approval before it can be formally adopted by the Commission. At its meeting on March 20, 2012, the Commission approved the attached budget for fiscal year 2012 -2013 to be forwarded to the governing bodies of the two localities. The 2012 -2013 budget for the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission shows revenues and expenditures of $8,115,057. This reflects that airport operations are self- supporting and do not require any additional supplement from either the County or the City. This is a one point two percent (1.2 %) increase in revenues from the 2011 -2012 budget. The Commission also adopted the attached proposed capital expenditure budget program. The capital expenditures total $3,700,000. - these expenditures will be funded with Federal and State Grant funds and Commission capital funds. Jacqueline Shuck, Executive Director of the Roanoke Regional Airport commission, will attend the Board of Supervisors meeting to answer any questions that the Board may have. Page 1 of 2 FISCAL IMPACT: On June 30, 1996, the County made its final payment of $264,640, which completed its original ten -year capital contribution to the airport. There will not be any additional monies needed as a result of this budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adopting the attached resolution approving the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission budget for the fiscal year 2012 -2013. Page 2of2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 201 2 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012 -2013 UPON CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS WHEREAS, Section 24.B of the Regional Airport Commission Act and Section 17.(a) of the contract between the City of Roanoke, Roanoke County and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission provide that the Commission shall prepare and submit its operating budget for the forthcoming year to the Board of Supervisors of the County and City Council of the City; and WHEREAS, by report dated March 20, 2012, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Clerk of the Board, the Executive Director of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission has submitted a request that the County approve the fiscal year 2012 -2013 budget of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that the fiscal year 201 2 -201 3 budget and proposed capital expenditures for the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission as set forth in the March 20, 2012, report of the Commission Executive Director, a copy of which is incorporated by reference herein, is hereby APPROVED, and the County Administrator and the Clerk are authorized to execute and attest, respectively, on behalf of the County, any documentation, in form approved by the County Attorney, necessary to evidence said approval. Page 1 of 1 ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION 5202 Aviation Drive Roanoke, VA 24012 -1148 (540) 362 -1999 FAX (540) 563-0838 www,roanokeairport,com March 20, 2012 Honorable Chairman and Members Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 -0798 Re: Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Fiscal Year 2012- 2 Budget and Proposed Capital Expenditures Dear Chairman Flora and Members of the Board: In accordance with the requirements of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Contract dated January 28, 1987, as amended, the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission is hereby submitting its Fiscal Year 2012 -2013 operating Budget (Attachment I) for approval. This Budget was adopted by the Commission at its meeting on March 20, 2012. We are also providing a separate listing of Capital Expenditures which are expected to exceed $100,000 in cost and are intended to benefit five or more future accounting periods (Attachment II). You will note that no deficit is anticipated in either the operating Budget or for the listed Capital Expenditures; therefore, no additional appropriations are being requested or anticipated from the City or the County of Roanoke. Formal approval of the Operating Budget and the Capital Expenditure List by resolution of each of the participating political subdivisions would be appreciated. I would be pleased to respond to any questions or comments that you may have with regard to this matter. On behalf of the Commission, thank you very much for your assistance and cooperation. y ry truly y o ul s� * q /Ie uelne L. Shuck Executive Director Enclosures cc: Chairman and Members, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Mark Allan Williams, General Counsel Paul M. Mahoney, Roanoke County Attorney Debbie Jacks, Clerk to the Board, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ,TTACHMENT ROA►NO E REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION PROPOSED BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 2011-1012 2012 -2013 Bud Bud Percenta EXPENSE BUDGET Expenditures Expenditures Chan I Operations and Maintenance Expenses A. Salaries, Wa and Benefits $4,335,027 $42375,228 0.9% B. Operatin Expenditures 31103,980 3,198,122 3.0% C. Other Maintenance & Improvement Projects, 245,000 157,025 -35.9% Total Operations and Maintenance 71684,007 7,730,375 0.6% ,2 Non-Operatin Exp nses A. Interest 39,397 35,378 -10.2% B. Debt Service 88,741 92,762 4.5% Total Non-Operatin 128,138 1281,138 0.0% 3 Capital Expenses A. Capital Projects and Purchases 161,875 1681400 4.0% B. Capital Improvement Fund (Surplus) 47,227 88,144 86.6% Total Capital Expenses 209,102 256,544 22.7% Total Bud Expenditures 8 8,115,057 1.2% 2011-2012 2012-2013 Bud Bud REVENUE PROJECTIONS Revenues Revenues Chan 1 Operating Revenues A. Airfield $1,269,950 $1,238,419 -2.5% B. General Aviation 428,443 474,757 10.8% C. Terminal Related D. Other Revenues 41892,292 313,424 59150,703 326,382 5.3% 4.1 % Total Projected Operatin Revenues 60904,109 71190,261 4.1% 2 Non-Operatin Revenues A. Interest on Investments 407,800 354,591 -13.0% B. Gain on Sale of Propert 0 5,000 B. State Funds 561,230 427,205 -23.9% C. Federal Reimbursable Funds 148,108, 138,000 -6.8% Total Projected Non-Operatin Revenues 11117,138 924,796 -17.2% Total Ero ed Revenue ject $ 8,021,247 $ 81115,057 1.2% ATTACHMENT 11 Proposed Capital Expenditures (For projects expected to exceed $100,000 in cost and intended to benefit five or more accountin periods) Pro A. Rehabilitate Air Carrier Apron: 1. Description: The concrete on the nearl 23 y ear old terminal aircraft parkin ramp is in g ood shape; however, the joints are showin si of needin to be replaced. Before an dama occurs, it would be prudent to replace the j oints. 2. Fun The cost is approximatel $1,500,000. 3. Anticipated Funding Sources: Federal AIP Funds: $173507000 State Aviation Entitlement Funds: $ 150,000 B. Construct Runway 6 EMAS CAPS: 1 Description: The EMAS bed at the approach to Runwa 16 is nearin 10 y ears in a If the Commission is to avoid replacin the entire bed in the next few y ears, it will need to install the newl developed plastic caps for EMAS. These caps ma extend the life of the bed b up to ten y ears. 2. Fun The estimated cost is approximatel $1,200,000. 3. Anticipated Fundin Sources: Federal All? Funds: $15080,000 State Aviation Entitlement Funds: $ 1201000 C. Replace Second Terminal Chiller: 1 Description: Replace the second 23 y ear old chiller in the airport terminal that is becomin unreliable. 2. Fun The estimated cost is $300,000. 3. Anticipated Fundin Sources: State Aviation Entitlement Funds: 189)000 1 Commission Funds: $ 111,000 D. Renovate Brick Wall to Parking Lot: 1- Description The brick wall near the central staircase and ramps from the short term parking jot is beginning to fail. The wall needs to be repaired, replace or modified for the benefit of the public. 2. Fun din The estimated cost is up to $400,000. 3_ Anticipate Funding Sources: State Aviation Entitlement Funds: $320,000 Commission Funds: $80,000 E. Replace Parking Booth 1. Description: Install new and larger parking lot booth to provide sufficient office and storage space. 2. Funding: The estimated cost is $ 300 3. Anticipated Funding Sources: Commission Funds: $300,000 II. Anticipated Funding Sources: Federal AIP Grant Funds $2,430,000 State Aviation Grant Funds 779,000 Commission Capital Funds 491,000 City and County Funds 0 Estimated Total Projects Funding $3,700,000 2 RESOLUTION OF THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION Adopted this 20th da of March 2012 No. 05-032012 A RESOLUTION approvin and adoptin the Commission' s Operatin and Capital Purchase Bud for fiscal y ear 2012-2013. BE IT RESOLVED b the Roanoke Re Airport Commission that the fiscal y ear 2012-2013 Operatin and Capital Purchase Bud for the Commission as set forth in the report and accompan attachment b the Executive Director dated March 20, 2012, is hereb approved BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Executive Director is authorized on behalf of the Commission to submit the fiscal y ear 2012-2013 Operatin and Capital Purchase Bud as well as a list of Proposed Capital Expenditures, to the Roanoke Cit Council and the Roanoke Count Board of Supervisors for approval pursuant to the contract between the Commission, Roanoke Cit and Roanoke Count dated Januar 28, 19871 as amended. ATTEST: Se r tar VOTE: AYES: Gust, Lawrence, Minnix, Doole NAYS: None ABSENT: Porterfield ACTION NO. ITEM NO. E - 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: March 27, 2012 Resolution setting the allocation percentage for personal property tax relief for the 2012 tax year Laurie Gearheart Assistant Director of Finance B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The Personal Property Tax Relief Act (PPTRA or the Act) of 1998 established aState -wide program to provide relief to owners of personal use motor vehicles. The 1998 Act envisioned a five (5) year phase -in of relief expressed as a percentage of the bill related to the first $20,000 of personal use vehicle value. Costs soared and the percentage was frozen at seventy (70 %) since 2001. In 2004 and 2005, additional legislation was passed to amend the original Act. This legislation capped PPTRA at $950 million for all Virginia localities for Tax Years 2005 and beyond. PPTRA funds are allocated to individual localities based on each government's pro rata share of Tax Year 2004 payments from the Commonwealth. The County's share of the $950 million is $12,229,857. At the December 20, 2005, Board meeting ordinance 122005 -10 amending the Roanoke County Code by adding a new Section 21 -225 to provide for the implementation of the 2004 -2005 changes to the Personal Property Tax Relief Act (PPTRA) of 1998 was adopted by the Board of Supervisors. Page 1 of 2 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The County uses The PPTRA Allocation Model developed by the State to calculate the effective reimbursement rate. This model uses historical trends and a five (5) year rolling average to calculate the effective reimbursement rate. This same methodology for calculating the rate is used by many of our neighboring localities. In 2012, once again County staff computed the effective reimbursement rate based upon the PPTRA allocation model. The percentage is similar to those localities that are ready to adopt their resolutions. The rate for the county is 05.54% and The Town of Vinton is 85.86 %. The Board is required by the State to annually adopt a resolution setting the percentage reduction in personal property for that year. The attached resolution establishes the percentage reduction at 65.54% for the 2012 tax year. FISCAL IMPACT: The percentage reduction is calculated to distribute the $12,229,857 block grant allocation from the State in the manner described above. There will be some timing delays in the receipt of the State funds, since they are now being received in the following fiscal year (2012 - 2013), but Roanoke county will be allowed to accrue these funds back to the 2011- 2012 year for accounting purposes so the budget will be balanced. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff reviewed this calculation and recommend adopting the attached resolution which establishes the percentage reduction for personal property tax relief at 65.54% for Roanoke county for the 2012 tax year. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2012 RESOLUTION SETTING THE ALLOCATION PERCENTAGE FOR PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX RELIEF IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR THE 2012 TAX YEAR WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements set forth in Section 58.1 -3524 (C) (2) and Section 58.1 -3912 (E) of the Code of Virginia, as amended by Chapter 1 of the Acts of Assembly and as set forth in item 503.E (Personal Property Tax Relief Program or "PPTRA ") of Chapter 951 of the 2005 Acts of Assembly and qualifying vehicle with a taxable situs within the County commencing January 1, 2012, shall receive personal property tax relief; and, WHEREAS, this Resolution is adopted pursuant to Ordinance 122005 -10 adopted by the Board of Supervisors on December 20, 2005. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, as follows: 1. That tax relief shall be allocated so as to eliminate personal property taxation for qualifying personal use vehicles valued at $1,000 or less. 2. That qualifying personal use vehicles valued at $1,001 - $20,000 will be eligible for 65.54% tax relief. 3. That qualifying personal use vehicles valued at $20,001 or more shall only receive 65.54% tax relief on the first $20,000 of value; and 4. That all other vehicles which do not meet the definition of qualifying (for example, including but not limited to, business use vehicles, farm use vehicles, motor homes, etc.) will not be eligible for any form of tax relief Linder this program. Page 1 of 2 5. That the percentages applied to the categories of qualifying personal use vehicles are estimated fully to use all available PPTRA funds allocated to Roanoke County by the Commonwealth of Virginia. 6. supplemental assessments for tax years 2005 and prior shall be deemed non - qualifying for purposes of state tax relief and the local share due from the taxpayer shall represent 100% of the assessed personal property tax. 7. That this Resolution shall be effective from and after the date of its adoption. Page 2of2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. E -3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMIT'rED BY: March 27, 2012 ReSOILItion granting a waiver to the American Cancer Society and Relay for Life of Vinton under Section 13-23 of the Roanoke county Code to the provisions of the County's Noise Ordinance, Article II. Noise of Chapter 13. Offenses - Miscellaneous Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The American Cancer Society and Relay for Life of Vinton have requested a waiver from the county's noise ordinance under Section 13-23 of the Roanoke County Code. The American Cancer Society and Relay for Life of Vinton are planning an annual overnight Relay for Life fundraiser at William Byrd High School beginning at 6:00 p.m. on Friday, April 20, 2012, and ending at 7:00 a.m. on Saturday, April 21, 2012. The County noise ordinance now prohibits noise as follows: Section 13 -21 (5) Operating or permitting the use or operation of any instrument, machine or any other device for the production of sound at a volume sufficient to be plainly audible through partitions common to 2 residences within a building or plainly audible at 50 feet or more from such device or its source. This waiver would allow music and announcements overnight for this event. The attached resolution grants this waiver of the noise ordinance and authorizes the music and announcements to be made from 6:00 p.m. on April 20, 2012, to 7:00 a.m. on April 21, 2012. Page 1 of 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board consider the adoption of the attached resolution. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2012 RESOLUTION GRANTING A WAIVER TO THE AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY AND RELAY FOR LIFE OF VINTON UNDER SECTION 13 -23 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COUNTY'S NOISE ORDINANCE, ARTICLE 11, "NOISE" OF CHAPTER 13. "OFFENSES - MISCELLANEOUS" WHEREAS, Relay For Life of Vinton, a fundraiser for the American Cancer Society, will be holding its annual overnight Relay For Life event at William Byrd High School for the Town of Vinton, Roanoke County, and the general public on Friday, April 20 2012, from 6:00 p.m. to Saturday, April 21, 2012, at 7:00 a.m.; and WHEREAS, Relay for Life is held overnight to represent the journey of a cancer patient, and stress that cancer continues to exist even when the sun has set. In order to accommodate this atmosphere and bring the community together in the fight against cancer, American Cancer Society and Relay For Life of Vinton are requesting a waiver of the Roanoke County noise ordinance from 6:00 p.m. on Friday, April 20, 2012, to 7:00 a.m. on Saturday, April 21, 2012; and WHEREAS, Section 13 -23 of the Roanoke County Code establishes certain standards for the Board of Supervisors to grant waivers from the provision of the Roanoke County noise ordinance to avoid undue hardship upon consideration of certain factors set forth in sub- section (b) of Section 13 -23 and after making certain alternative findings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: Page 1 of 2 I . That the provisions of Section 13-21. Specific acts as noise, sub- section (5) and Section 13 -20. General prohibition of Article II. Noise be waived from 6:00 p.m., April 20, 2012, to 7:00 a.m., April 21, 2012. 2. That this waiver is granted specifically to The American Cancer Society and Relay for Life of Vinton for the Relay for Life fundraiser at William Byrd High School on April 20-21, 2012. Page 2of2 American Cancer Society 2840 Electric Road, Suite 106 Roanoke, VA 24018 March 7, 2012 Board of Supervisors of Roanoke 5204 Bernard Dr Fourth Floor Roanoke, VA 24018 To whom it May Concern: The Relay For Life of Vinton, a fundraiser for the American Cancer Society held in Vinton located in Roanoke County, will be holding its annual overnight Relay For Life event at William Byrd High School for the Town of Vinton, Roanoke County, and the general public on Friday, April 20, 2012, from 6:00 PM to Saturday, April 21, 2012 at 7:00am. Relay For Life is held overnight to represent the journey of a cancer patient, and stress that cancer continues to exist even when the sun has set. In order to accommodate this atmosphere and bring the community together in the fight against cancer, the Relay For Life of Vinton is requesting a waiver of the Roanoke County noise ordinance for nine hours from 10:00 PM on Friday April 20, 2012 to 7:00 AM on Saturday April 21, 2012. We have the capacity to control the volume of the music and announcements; however we would greatly appreciate not having to turn them off completely. The music and announcements keep the participants engaged at the event, and help to discourage them from leaving early. The money raised through Relay For Life is making a difference in the lives of cancer patients everywhere. Thanks in part to donations collected all across the United States of America, the American Cancer Society has helped to save I I million cancer patients. Locally the money raised helps fund patient services such as free wigs, free rides to and from treatment, free breast cancer and prostate cancer support group, and to help keep our free 1 -800 number available all day, every day. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Julie Terrell Angie Chewning Lewis American Cancer Society American Cancer Society Volunteer Community Manager Relay For Life of Vinton, Chairperson ACTION NO. ITEM NO. E -4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: March 27, 2012 Request for approval of agreements between the County of Roanoke and - the Western Virginia Water Authority for use of space on tower sites for meter reading radio equipment County Administrator kA Anne Marie Green Director of Department of General Services B. Clayton Goodman III 7LL COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: v � w The Western Virginia Water Authority has requested permission to install equipment on the County's Twelve O'clock Knob and Ft. Lewis Mountain towers for radio equipment required for implementation of the new remote meter reading system which the Board was briefed about at its March 13, 2012, meeting. Currently, the Water Authority bills on an estimated basis, actually reading the meters every sixty (G0) days. This process is labor intensive, uses a considerable amount of fuel to reach all customers, and is only ninety percent (90 %) accurate. The new system will allow meters to be read continually, so the Authority will be able to bill customers accurately on a monthly basis, monitor unusual usage situations where there may be leakage and is ninety -eight percent (98 %) accurate. It will save money and reduce environmental impact, since manual reading from vehicles will no longer be required. The system requires that radio equipment be placed at various locations around the Roanoke Valley, and two of these sites are Twelve O'clock Knob and Ft. Lewis Mountain. The County's towers at those two sites are used for the public safety radio system and this use would be compatible with that function. The Water Authority will reimburse the County for the additional electricity and maintenance expenses at the two sites in the amount of $250/month for the Twelve o'clock Knob site and $1001month for the Ft. Lewis site. The Page 1 of 2 increased cost for Twelve o'clock Knob includes maintenance for the access road; the Water Authority has a separate access easement with a private citizen for Ft. Lewis. Installation of the equipment as outlined above will allow the Western Virginia Water Authority to provide more accurate billing and service to its customers, the businesses and residents of the Roanoke Valley. FISCAL IMPACT: Roanoke County will receive $4,200 per year as reimbursement for utilities and operating costs involved in use of the county's tower structures. STAFF RECOMMENDA'rION: Staff recommends approval of the agreements between the County of Roanoke and the Western Virginia Water Authority. Staff further recommends that the Board authorize the County Administrator or his designee to execute the necessary documents, on forms approved by the County Attorney's office. Page 2 of 2 County of Roanoke Roanoke CommIT TECHNOLOGY 5925 Cove Road Roanoke, Virginia 24019 ANTENNA SITE USE AGREEMENT This Antenna Site Use Agreement ( "Agreement ") for Fort Lewis is entered into this day of , 2012 between Roanoke, County, Virginia ( "County ") and The Western Virginia Water Authority ( "Authority "). (a) For the Initial Term, Authority shall pay County One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) per month as a reimbursement for utilities and maintenance costs associated with upkeep of the premises and equipment. This Reimbursement shall be payable on the first day of each month in advance at the address set forth in Paragraph 13, or at the option of the Authority, as a lump sum due on April 1 of each term or renewal term of this agreement. (b) For any Renewal Term, Reimbursement will increase by no more that 10% percent during any 5 year period. Increase will be based on the current Consumer Price index during the five (5) year period. (c) County grants Authority the right to draw electricity from the existing electric supply within the Premises and the Building. (d) If this Agreement is terminated prior to its expiration, reimbursement shall be prorated to the date of termination. 5. Interference. (a) Authority shall operate the Authority's Facilities as defined in 6(a) in a manner that will not cause interference to County and any Lessees of the communications site; provided that their installation predates the Authority Facilities. All operations by Authority shall be lawful and in compliance with all FCC requirements. (b) Subsequent to the installation of the Authority's Facilities, County shall not permit its Lessees or licensees to install new equipment on the property if such is likely to cause interference with Authority's operations. If any such interference occurs Authority shall immediately shut down any on site equipment causing such interference. Authority shall have 60 days to rectify such problems causing interference and at no time shall Authority use such equipment until interference is corrected. If such use occurs other than for testing it shall be deemed a material breach by County. In the event any such interference occurs, Authority will be notified by phone or email at WVWA Main Office. Authority shall have the right, in addition to any other rights that it may have at law or in equity, to terminate this Agreement. 6. Improvements; Liability; Utilities; Access. (a) Authority has the right to erect, maintain, and operate on the Premises radio communications facilities, including, but not limited to, transmitters and receivers and all related equipment, radio transmitting and receiving antennas and supporting structures thereto ( "Lessee Facilities "). In connection therewith, Authority has the right to do all work necessary to prepare, maintain and alter the Premises for Authority's business operations and to install transmission lines, connecting the antennas to the transmitters and receivers. All of Authority's installation work shall be performed at Authority's sole cost and expense and in a good and workmanlike manner in accordance with Authority's specifications. Title to the Authority's Facilities shall be in Authority. Authority has the right to remove all Authority Facilities at its sole expense on or before the expiration or earlier termination of the term, provided Authority repairs any damage to the Premises cause by such removal. (b) Authority has the right to improve the present utilities on the Premises and to install new utilities (including, but not limited to, standby power generator for Authority's exclusive use at a location on the Property acceptable to both parties). Authority also has the right to bring utilities across the Property in order to service the Premises. County shall, at Authority's request, execute necessary documents evidencing such utility easement rights. (c) County shall provide to Authority, Authority's employees, agents and subcontractors access over the Property to the Premises 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, at no charge to lessee. 7. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated without further liability on (30) days prior notice as follows: (a) by either party upon a default of any covenant or term hereof by the other party, which default is not cured with sixty (60) days of receipt of written notice of default, provided that the grace period for any monetary default is ten (10) days from receipt of notice: (b) by Authority if it does not obtain or maintain any license, permit or other approval necessary to the installation and operation of the Authority Facilities: or (c) by Authority if Authority determines that the Premises are not appropriate for is operations for economic or technological reasons, including signal interference: or (d) The County may terminate this Agreement for cause if the County determines that the Authority's actions pose a risk in violation of any federal or state law, regulation or ordinance applicable to public health, safety or welfare and issues written notice, or if the Authority's actions result in the issuance of a legal Notice of Violation of any public health, safety or welfare law, regulation or ordinance and Authority is unable to cure the conditions specified in the County's notice or the legal Notice of Violation within the time prescribed therein, then County may immediately terminate this Agreement, by written notice to the Authority Furthermore, this agreement must automatically terminate coincident with Roanoke County, Virginia's lease of said property. 8. Taxes. If personal property taxes are assessed, Authority shall pay any portion of the taxes directly attributable to the Property. 9. Insurance. (a) Authority shall procure, maintain, and pay for a public liability policy, naming County as an additional insured, with limits of $1,000,000 for bodily injury. $1,000,000 for property damage, $2,000,000 aggregate, with a certificate of insurance to be furnished to County within 30 days of written request. Such policy shall provide that termination or cancellation will not occur without at least 15 days prior written notice to County. (b) Neither party shall be liable to the other (or to the other's successors or assigns) for any loss or damage caused by fire or any of the risks enumerated in a standard fire insurance policy with an extended coverage endorsement. 10. Destruction of Premises. If the Premises or Facilities are destroyed or damaged, Authority may elect to terminate this Agreement as of the date of the damage or destruction by notice given to County no more than forty -five (45) days following the date of any such damage or destruction. In such event, all rights and obligations of the parties shall cease as of the date of the damage or destruction. 11. Condemnation. (a) If a condemning authority takes all of the Property, or a portion sufficient to render the Premises unsuitable for Authority's use, this Agreement shall terminate as of the date the title vests in the condemning authority. Sale of all or part of the Property to a purchaser with the power of eminent domain in the face of the exercise of power shall be deemed a taking by condemnation. (b) Authority may claim and recover from the condemning authority an award for Authority's moving expenses, business dislocation damages, Authority's personal property and fixtures and the unamortized costs of any improvements paid for by Authority. 12. Hold Harmless. Authority agrees to hold County harmless from any and all claims arising from the installation, use, maintenance, repair or removal of the Authority Facilities, except for claims arising from the negligence of County, its Employees, agents or independent contractors. This paragraph shall not be deeded a waiver of any sovereign immunity or other immunity which either party to this agreement may be entitled to claim. 13. Notices. All notices, requests, demands and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed given if personally delivered, sent by facsimile or by and overnight courier providing proof of service, or mailed, certified mail, return receipt requested, to the following addresses: If to County: County of Roanoke, Virginia P.O. BOX 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 -0798 Attention: Director of General Services If to Authority: Western Virginia Water Authority 601 S. Jefferson Street Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Attention: Gary Robertson 14. Title and Quiet Enjoyment: County warrants that it has full right, power, and authority to execute this Agreement and has good and marketable title to the Property. County further warrants that Authority shall, provided Authority is not in material default, have the quiet enjoyment of the Premises. 15. Assignment. Either party may, upon notice to the other party, assign or transfer its rights and obligations arising under this Agreement to any of its governmental entities or affiliates, or to a successor by consolidation or merger. In all other instances either party may assign or transfer its rights and obligations only upon written consent of the other party, which consent shall not be withheld or delayed unreasonably. 16. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall run with the Land, described on Exhibit A. Authority shall have the right to submit this Agreement for recordation to the appropriate governmental agency having jurisdiction over the Property. This Agreement shall be binding upon and insure to the benefit of the parties, their respective successors and assigns. 17. Waiver of County's Lien. County waives any lien rights it may have concerning the Authority Facilities which are deemed Authority's personal property; and Authority has the right to remove the same at any time without County's consent. 18. Tower Marking and Lighting Requirements. County acknowledges that it, and not Authority, shall be responsible for compliance with all tower or building marking and lighting requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration ( "FAA ") or the Federal Communications Commission ( "FCC "). County shall indemnify and hold Authority harmless from any fines or other liabilities caused by County's failure to comply with such requirements. Should Authority be cited by either the FCC or FAA because this site is not in compliance and should County fail to cure the conditions of noncompliance within the time frame allowed by the citing agency, Authority may either terminate this Agreement immediately on notice to County or proceed to cure the conditions of noncompliance at County's expense. 19. Miscellaneous. a. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and understanding between the parties, and supersedes all offers, negotiations and other agreements. There are no representations or understanding of any kind not set forth herein. Any amendments to this Agreement must be in writing and executed by both parties. b. If any provision of this Agreement is invalid or unenforceable with respect to any party, the remainder of this Agreement or the application of such provision to persons other than those as to whom it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected and each provision of this Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. Dated as of the date first above written. County of Roanoke, Virginia ATTEST/WITNESS ATTEST/WITNESS STATE OF CITY /COUNTY OF By- Its Western Virginia Water Authority, Virginia By- Its On this day of ,2012 before me, a Notary Public in and for the Commonwealth of Virginia, personally appeared and acknowledged the said Agreement to be for use and purpose therein mentioned, and on oath stated he /she was authorized to execute said Agreement. WITNESS my hand and the official seal affixed the day and year first above written. My Commission expires: Notary Public NRN STATE OF ) CITY /COUNTY OF ) On this day of ,2012 before me, a Notary Public in and for the Commonwealth of Virginia, personally appeared and acknowledged the said Agreement to be for use and purpose therein mentioned, and on oath stated he /she was authorized to execute said Agreement. WITNESS my hand and the official seal affixed the day and year first above written. My Commission expires: Notary Public NRN Exhibit A The Property location is a parcel of land lying atop of the geographical location known as Ftlewis Mtn, Atop Ftlewis MT near Big Rock Gap, Roanoke County, Virginia. The Geodetic coordinates of the Property are as follows: 37 Degrees — 18' — 32.1 " N. Latitude 80 Degrees — 09" — 35.2" W. Longitude The telephone exchange of the Property is: 540 - 561 -8055 EXHIBIT B The premises shall consist of the following: (a) floor space in the Shelter which floor space shall be sufficient in size to accommodate Lessee's one (1) equipment cabinet, having a foot print of 48 "Height X 24" Width 28 "Depth' together with clearance of approximately two feet in front and 1' in rear of the cabinet to facilitate servicing the equipment. (b) space on the Tower at the approximate height of 150 feet for one (1) antenna mount for the installation of radio transmitting and receiving antenna, and for one 1 5/8" or smaller cable run, space on Ice bridge for one (1) GPS Antenna. The exact location of the antenna mounts shall be determined jointly by the parties after a physical inspection of the site by Authority's engineers. F R Kaanoke C:auntc County of Roanoke INFORMATION Comm IT TECHNOLOGY 0 5925 Cove Road � g38 Roanoke, Virginia 24019 ANTENNA SITE USE AGREEMENT This Antenna Site Use Agreement ( "Agreement ") for 12 O'Clock Knob is entered into this day of , 2012 between Roanoke, County, Virginia ( "County ") and The Western Virginia Water Authority ( "Authority "). For good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Premises. County is the owner of a telecommunications tower (the "Tower ") and an equipment shelter ( "The Shelter') located on a parcel of land ( "Land ") as described on Exhibit A annexed hereto (the Tower, the Shelter and the Land are collectively the "Property "). Authority desires to use space within the Shelter and space upon the Tower (collectively, the "Premises ") in such amounts and in such locations as described on Exhibit B annexed hereto, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 2. Use. The premises shall be used by Authority for the transmission and reception of radio communication signals on various frequencies and for the installation, maintenance and operation of necessary facilities, including, but not limited to, transceivers and antennas. County agrees to cooperate with Authority in obtaining at Authority's expense any licenses, permits and other approvals required for Authority's use of the Premises. 3. Term. This Agreement shall be for an initial period of five (5) years ( "Initial Term ") commencing on April 1, 2012 ( "Commencement Date "). Authority shall have the right to extend the Initial term for two (2) successive five (5) year periods (each a "Renewal Term ") on the terms and conditions set forth herein. This Agreement shall be automatically renewed for each successive Renewal Term unless either County or Authority sends written notice of non - renewal to the other no later than ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of the Initial Term or any Renewal Term, such notice to be provided in accordance with Paragraph 13 of this Agreement. 4. Reimbursement. (a) For the Initial Term, Authority shall pay County Two Hundred fifty Dollars ($250.00) per month as a reimbursement for utilities and maintenance costs associated with upkeep of the premises and equipment. This Reimbursement shall be payable on the first day of each month in advance at the address set forth in Paragraph 13, or at the option of the Authority, as a lump sum due on April 1 of each term or renewal term of this Agreement. (b) For any Renewal Term, Reimbursement will increase by no more that 10% percent during any 5 year period. Increase will be based on the current Consumer Price index during the five (5) year period. (c) County grants Authority the right to draw electricity from the existing electric supply within the Premises and the Building. (d) If this Agreement is terminated prior to its expiration, reimbursement shall be prorated to the date of termination. 5. Interference. (a) Authority shall operate the Authority's Facilities as defined in 6(a) in a manner that will not cause interference to County and any Lessees of the communications site; provided that their installation predates the Authority Facilities. All operations by Authority shall be lawful and in compliance with all FCC requirements. (b) Subsequent to the installation of the Authority's Facilities, County shall not permit its Lessees or licensees to install new equipment on the property if such is likely to cause interference with Authority's operations. If any such interference occurs Authority shall immediately shut down any on site equipment causing such interference. Authority shall have 60 days to rectify such problems causing interference and at no time shall Authority use such equipment until interference is corrected. If such use occurs other than for testing it shall be deemed a material breach by County. In the event any such interference occurs, Authority will be notified by phone or email at WVWA Main Office. Authority shall have the right, in addition to any other rights that it may have at law or in equity, to terminate this Agreement. 6. Improvements; Liability; Utilities; Access. (a) Authority has the right to erect, maintain, and operate on the Premises radio communications facilities, including, but not limited to, transmitters and receivers and all related equipment, radio transmitting and receiving antennas and supporting structures thereto ( "Lessee Facilities "). In connection therewith, Authority has the right to do all work necessary to prepare, maintain and alter the Premises for Authority's business operations and to install transmission lines, connecting the antennas to the transmitters and receivers. All of Authority's installation work shall be performed at Authority's sole cost and expense and in a good and workmanlike manner in accordance with Authority's specifications. Title to the Authority's Facilities shall be in Authority. Authority has the right to remove all Authority Facilities at its sole expense on or before the expiration or earlier termination of the term, provided Authority repairs any damage to the Premises cause by such removal. (b) Authority has the right to improve the present utilities on the Premises and to install new utilities (including, but not limited to, standby power generator for Authority's exclusive use at a location on the Property acceptable to both parties). Authority also has the right to bring utilities across the Property in order to service the Premises. County shall, at Authority's request, execute necessary documents evidencing such utility easement rights. (c) County shall provide to Authority, Authority's employees, agents and subcontractors access over the Property to the Premises 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, at no charge to the Authority. 7. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated without further liability on (30) days prior notice as follows: (a) by either party upon a default of any covenant or term hereof by the other party, which default is not cured with sixty (60) days of receipt of written notice of default, provided that the grace period for any monetary default is ten (10) days from receipt of notice: (b) by Authority if it does not obtain or maintain any license, permit or other approval necessary to the installation and operation of the Authority Facilities: or (c) by Authority if Authority determines that the Premises are not appropriate for is operations for economic or technological reasons, including signal interference: or (d) The County may terminate this Agreement for cause if the County determines that the Authority's actions pose a risk in violation of any federal or state law, regulation or ordinance applicable to public health, safety or welfare and issues written notice, or if the Authority's actions result in the issuance of a legal Notice of Violation of any public health, safety or welfare law, regulation or ordinance and Authority is unable to cure the conditions specified in the County's notice or the legal Notice of Violation within the time prescribed therein, then County may immediately terminate this Agreement, by written notice to the Authority. Furthermore, this agreement must automatically terminate coincident with Roanoke County, Virginia's lease of said property. 8. Taxes. If personal property taxes are assessed, Authority shall pay any portion of the taxes directly attributable to the Property. 9. Insurance. (a) Authority shall procure, maintain, and pay for a public liability policy, naming County as an additional insured, with limits of $1,000,000 for bodily injury. $1,000,000 for property damage, $2,000,000 aggregate, with a certificate of insurance to be furnished to County within 30 days of written request. Such policy shall provide that termination or cancellation will not occur without at least 15 days prior written notice to County. (b) Neither party shall be liable to the other (or to the other's successors or assigns) for any loss or damage caused by fire or any of the risks enumerated in a standard fire insurance policy with an extended coverage endorsement. 10. Destruction of Premises. If the Premises or Facilities are destroyed or damaged, Authority may elect to terminate this Agreement as of the date of the damage or destruction by notice given to County no more than forty -five (45) days following the date of any such damage or destruction. In such event, all rights and obligations of the parties shall cease as of the date of the damage or destruction. 11. Condemnation. (a) If a condemning authority takes all of the Property, or a portion sufficient to render the Premises unsuitable for Authority's use, this Agreement shall terminate as of the date the title vests in the condemning authority. Sale of all or part of the Property to a purchaser with the power of eminent domain in the face of the exercise of power shall be deemed a taking by condemnation. (b) Authority may claim and recover from the condemning authority an award for Authority's moving expenses, business dislocation damages, Authority's personal property and fixtures and the unamortized costs of improvements paid for by Authority. 12. Hold Harmless. Authority agrees to hold County harmless from any and all claims arising from the installation, use, maintenance, repair or removal of the Authority Facilities, except for claims arising from the negligence of County, its Employees, agents or independent contractors. This paragraph shall not be deeded a waiver of any sovereign immunity or other immunity which either party to this agreement may be entitled to claim. 13. Notices. All notices, requests, demands and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed given if personally delivered, sent by facsimile or by and overnight courier providing proof of service, or mailed, certified mail, return receipt requested, to the following addresses: If to County: County of Roanoke, Virginia P.O. BOX 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 -0798 Attention: Director of General Services If to Authority: Western Virginia Water Authority 601 S. Jefferson Street Roanoke, VA 24011 Attention: Gary Robertson 14. Title and Quiet Enjoyment: County warrants that it has full right, power, and authority to execute this Agreement and has good and marketable title to the Property. County further warrants that Authority shall, provided Authority is not in material default, have the quiet enjoyment of the Premises. 15. Assignment. Either party may, upon notice to the other party, assign or transfer its rights and obligations arising under this Agreement to any of its governmental entities or affiliates, or to a successor by consolidation or merger. In all other instances either party may assign or transfer its rights and obligations only upon written consent of the other party, which consent shall not be withheld or delayed unreasonably. 16. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall run with the Land, described on Exhibit A. Authority shall have the right to submit this Agreement for recordation to the appropriate governmental agency having jurisdiction over the Property. This Agreement shall be binding upon and insure to the benefit of the parties, their respective successors and assigns. 17. Waiver of County's Lien. County waives any lien rights it may have concerning the Authority Facilities which are deemed Authority's personal property; and Authority has the right to remove the same at any time without County's consent. 18. Tower Marking and Lighting Requirements. County acknowledges that it, and not Authority, shall be responsible for compliance with all tower or building marking and lighting requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration ( "FAA ") or the Federal Communications Commission ( "FCC "). County shall indemnify and hold Authority harmless from any fines or other liabilities caused by County's failure to comply with such requirements. Should Authority be cited by either the FCC or FAA because this site is not in compliance and should County fail to cure the conditions of noncompliance within the time frame allowed by the citing agency, Authority may either terminate this Agreement immediately on notice to County or proceed to cure the conditions of noncompliance at County's expense. 19. Miscellaneous. a. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and understanding between the parties, and supersedes all offers, negotiations and other agreements. There are no representations or understanding of any kind not set forth herein. Any amendments to this Agreement must be in writing and executed by both parties. b. If any provision of this Agreement is invalid or unenforceable with respect to any party, the remainder of this Agreement or the application of such provision to persons other than those as to whom it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected and each provision of this Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. Dated as of the date first above written. County of Roanoke, Virginia ATTEST /WITNESS: By: Its: Western Virginia Water Authority ATTEST /WITNESS: By: Its: STATE OF CITY /COUNTY OF On this day of ,2012 before me, a Notary Public in and for the Commonwealth of Virginia, personally appeared and acknowledged the said Agreement to be for use and purpose therein mentioned, and on oath stated he /she was authorized to execute said Agreement. WITNESS my hand and the official seal affixed the day and year first above written. My Commission expires STATE OF CITY /COUNTY OF Notary Public NRN On this day of ,2012 before me, a Notary Public in and for the Commonwealth of Virginia, personally appeared and acknowledged the said Agreement to be for use and purpose therein mentioned, and on oath stated he /she was authorized to execute said Agreement. WITNESS my hand and the official seal affixed the day and year first above written. My Commission expires: Notary Public NRN Exhibit A The Property location is a parcel of land lying atop of the geographical location known as 12 O'Clock Knob, in or near the City of Salem, Roanoke County, Virginia. The Geodetic coordinates of the Property are as follows: 37 Degrees — 15'— 2.0" N. Latitude 80 Degrees — 05" — 00.0" W. Longitude The telephone exchange of the Property is: EXHIBIT B The premises shall consist of the following: (a) floor space in the Shelter which floor space shall be sufficient in size to accommodate Lessee's one (1) equipment cabinet, having a foot print of 48 "Height X 24" Width 28 "Depth' together with clearance of approximately two feet in front and 1' in rear of the cabinet to facilitate servicing the equipment. (b) Space on the Tower at the approximate height of 89 feet for one (1) antenna mount for the installation of radio transmitting and receiving antennas, and for one 1 5/8" or smaller cable run, space on Ice bridge for one (1) GPS Antenna . The exact location of the antenna mounts shall be determined jointly by the parties after a physical inspection of the site by Authority's engineers. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. E - 5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: March 27, 2012 Resolution adopting a revised schedule of ambulance transport fees and providing for an effective date Richard E. Burch, Jr. Chief of Fire and Rescue B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Board of Supervisors implemented ambulance transport fees in - the fall of 2001. The funding was designated to supplement staffing and capital improvement projects for the Fire and Rescue Department. - rhe ambulance transport fees were established to coincide with the rate of the Federal Government's Medicare payment schedule. The Medicare rates are the maximum amounts that Medicare will pay for ambulance transport services and are adjusted annually by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). By utilizing the Medicare payment schedule, the County receives the maximum allowable reimbursement - from insurance companies and the Medicare program with the least required reimbursement from the patient. The Federal Government increases the Medicare reimbursed rates annually, The Fire and Rescue Department has established a one -step process for writing off payments by patients who are unable to pay their bills. This process of "compassionate billing" ensures that patients will not be subjected to collections if they do not have the means to pay their co- payment for services. The compassionate billing program has been very successful and a number of other Virginia jurisdictions have adopted our process. Page 1 of 2 The new rate increases proposed are to take effect on April 1, 2012 which are listed below: Type of Service Current County Rate Proposed County Rate Basic Life Support (BLS) $350.00 $375.00 Advance Life Support (ALS 1) $380.00 $425.00 Advance Life Support (ALS 2) $625.00 $650.00 Loaded Mileage $11.00 $11.00 Note: The new rate adjustment is projected to increase a patient's Medicare co- payment (out -of- pocket), depending on the type of insurance, by less than $5.00 per ambulance transport. FISCAL IMPACT: The projected increase in ambulance transport fees is approximately $95,000.00 annually in revenue. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the rate increase to help off -set the cost of additional Fire and Rescue Department budget reductions. 2. Do not approve the rate increase and use other funding sources to supplement Fire and Rescue Department's budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative 1: Approve the rate increase to help off -set the cost of additional Fire and Rescue Department budget reductions. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OR ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2012 RESOLUTION ADOPTING A REVISED SCHEDULE OF AMBULANCE TRANSPORT FEES AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors enacted a Fee for Services ordinance as an addition to the Roanoke County Code on May 22, 2001, which established the legal structure for providing emergency medical transport and accompanying fees as provided for by the Code of Virginia; and WHEREAS, Section 2 -131 of this ordinance, contained in Chapter 2 Administration of the Roanoke County Code, provides that the Board of Supervisors, by resolution, may establish reasonable fees for the provision of emergency medical services by all emergency medical service personnel, whether provided by volunteers or public employees, upon the recommendation of the County Administrator and the Chief of Fire and Rescue; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution on August 14, 2001, which resolution was revised on March 25, 2002; by Resolution 032502 -2; March 25, 2003; by Resolution 032503 -8; March 8, 2005; by Resolution 030805 -3; on August 14, 2007, by Resolution 081407 -0, and on May 25, 2010, by Resolution 052510 -3 upon the joint recommendation of the County Administrator and the Chief of Fire and Rescue for the establishment of reasonable fees for the provision of various levels of emergency medical services, including mileage fees for vehicles; and WHEREAS, the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services has issued regulations, effective April 1, 2002, which establish a fee schedule for the payment of ambulance services under the Medicare program based upon specific codes or Page 1 of 2 categories of ambulance services which must be complied with to receive Medicare reimbursements. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The fees which shall be charged by the county of Roanoke for the following described emergency medical services provided by the Roanoke County owned, operated, funded, housed or permitted emergency vehicles shall be as follows: Advance Life Support (ALS) 1 Emergency $425.00 Advance Life Support (ALS) 2 Emergency $650.00 Basic Life Support (BLS) Emergency $375.00 Mileage (loaded) $11.00 2. No recipient of ambulance services who cannot afford to pay the ambulance transport fees will be required to do so. I This resolution shall be in full force and effect on and after April 1, 2012. Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. E -6 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: March 27, 2012 Resolution authorizing the lease financing of certain fire rescue vehicles in an amount not to exceed $1.6 million Richard E. Burch, Jr. Chief of Fire and Rescue Rebecca Owens Director of Finance B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the July 26, 2011 Board meeting, the Board approved the purchase of three (3) fire vehicles and appropriated $1.6 million of future equipment lease proceeds for the project. Staff indicated that financing for this project would occur in the spring of 2012. The purchase was made through a cooperative contract with Houston Galveston Area Council and awarded to Pierce. The three (3) pumpers will go to Cave Spring, Hollins and Clearbrook stations. Delivery is expected in July /August 2012. This purchase will allow apparatus at those stations to be reassigned to Mason's Cove, Back Creek, Bent Mountain and Mt. Pleasant thus extending the life of these vehicles. This plan will result in three (3) vehicles being taken out of service and surplused. Historically, the County has funded the purchase of fire and rescue apparatus through an internal loan from the Risk Management fund or Health Insurance Reserves. An internal financing was less expensive than a conventional lease purchase or other bank financing. At this time, funds are not available in the Risk Management Fund or Health Insurance Reserves for this purchase. All loans previously made to the Fire Department for the purchase of equipment have been repaid. Page 1 of 2 Our financial advisors, Morgan Keegan, solicited bank bids for the financing of the fire trucks and compared these rates with Virginia Resources Authority (VRA) finance. The request was sent to six (6) banks and bids were received from BB &T and SunTrust Leasing. Attachment B summarizes the results of bids. The lowest all -in yield (after all costs) was submitted by SunTrust Leasing (2.16 %). Although the total debt service payback from VRA was less than SunTrust due to a shorter maturity date and bigger County contribution, the recommendation is to lock in the SunTrust lease as this would eliminate any interest rate risk inherent with a public offering such as the Virginia Resources Authority. FISCAL IMPACT: The amount previously appropriated by the Board was $1.6 million for this purchase. The purchase price for the fire vehicles was $1 ,582,823 and the lease issue costs are $17,750. The Fire department will need to make an upfront contribution of $573. The Fire and Rescue department has $300,000 budgeted for capital in their operating budget that will be used to pay the interest and principal payment associated with the equipment lease. Annual payments are detailed on attachment C. The total of interest and principal for this purchase are $1 ,690,581.98. STAFF RECOMMENDAmriON: Staff recommends approving the attached resolution which authorizes the lease financing of certain fire rescue vehicles in an amount not to exceed $1.6 million. Page 2 of 2 Attachment A CERTIFICATE OF THE CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, held on the day of March, 2012, the following Board of Supervisors members were recorded as present: PRESENT: On motion by , seconded by , the attached Resolution was adopted by a majority of the members of the Board of Supervisors and recorded as follows: MEMBER VOTE Dated: March , 20 12 CLERK, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 37860027 2.DOC A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA AUTHORIZING THE LEASE FINANCING OF CERTAIN EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors (the "Board ") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County ") has determined that it is necessary and desirable to acquire certain equipment for the County, including without limitation certain fire rescue vehicles (the "Equipment "), and to obtain financing for the Equipment through a financing lease providing financing, on a tax exempt basis, for the Equipment in an amount not to exceed $1,600,000 (the "Lease"), and WHEREAS, On July 26, 2011 the Board of Supervisors adopted a reimbursement resolution that declared its intention under Treasury Regulations Section 1.150 -2 to reimburse itself from the proceeds of a finance for certain costs of the purchase of three fire vehicles, and WHEREAS, the Board reasonably expects to reimburse advances made or to be made by the County to pay the costs of the Equipment from the proceeds of its debt or other financings. The maximum amount of financing expected to be issued for the Equipment is $1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COLTNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA: I. Acceptance of Proposal; Authorization and Execution of Documents. The County Administrator and the Finance Director, or either of them, is authorized and directed to accept a proposal to provide financing, on a tax exempt basis, for the Equipment that the County Administrator and the Finance Director, or either of them, determine to be in the County's best interest; provided that the maximum principal amount of such financing shall not exceed $1,600,000. The County Administrator and the Finance Director, or either of them, or such officers as either of them may designate are authorized to execute and deliver on behalf of the County an equipment lease agreement or other similar financing agreement (the "Lease ") and to execute and deliver such instruments, agreements, documents or certificates, and to do and perform such things and acts, as they shall deem necessary or appropriate to carry out the transactions authorized by this Resolution; and all of the foregoing, previously done or performed by such officers or agents of the County, are in all respects approved, ratified and confirmed. 2. Nature of Obligations The obligation of the County to make payments under the Lease is subject to appropriation each year by the Board. Nothing in this Resolution or the Lease shall constitute a debt or a pledge of the faith and credit of the County. I Effective Date This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. 37$60027 2.DOc Attachment B Roanoke County Fire Trucks Financing Summary March 15, 2012 To: Rebecca Owens, Finance Director From: Dianne Klaiss, Morgan Keegan Morgan Keegan was asked by the County to solicit bank bids for the financing of three fire trucks and compare these rates with a Virginia Resources Authority ( "VRA ") financing. The request was sent to 6 banks and I received bids from BB & T and SunTrust Leasing. Below we have provided the results of this request for proposals. . Amount Borrowed $1,600,000 $1,600,000 $1,600,000 Fire Dept. Contribution $573 $400 $30,000 Final Maturity 1/1/2018 1/1/2018 10/1/2017 Local Cost of Issuance $17,000 $17,000 $14,000 Other Estimated COI $250 $0 $20,375 Bank /Underwriters Fees* $500 $500 $8,965 Average Annual Debt Service $281,763 $282,872 $275,492 Total Debt Service $1,690,581 $1,697,235 $1,652,956 True Interest Cost 1.80% 1.93% 1.37 All-Inclusive Cost 2.16% 2.28% 2.17% Funds Received 5/15/2012 5/15/2012 6/13/2012 Commitment expires 4/4 45 days N/A In whole on payment date at Call Provision Anytime @ 2% 1% Non - Callable *BB & T will charge $2,250 if documents other than BB &T standard documents are used. The lowest all -in yield (after all costs) was submitted by SunTrust Leasing (2.16%). Although the total debt service payback from VRA was less than the SunTrust scenario (due to a shorter maturity date and bigger City contribution), we would recommend that the County lock in the SunTrust lease as this would eliminate any interest rate risk inherent with a public offering such as the Virginia Resources Authority. Attachment C $1,600,000 EDA of the County of Roanoke, Virginia $1.6 million over 6 years NonBQ SunTrust SINGLE PURPOSE Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +I 01/01/2013 26300.00 1.790% 17,979.56 281,779.56 01/01/2014 25700.00 1.790% 23,917.98 281,717.98 01/01/2015 262,500.00 1.790% 19,303.36 28103.36 01/01/2016 267,200.00 1.790% 1404.62 281 01/01/2017 271N0.00 1.790% 9,821.74 281,721.74 01/01/2018 27600.00 1.790% 4,954.72 281,754.72 Total $1,600,000.00 - $90,581.98 $1,690,581.98 Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $5,060.44 Average Life 3.163 Years Average Coupon 1.7900005% Net Interest Cost (NIC) 1.7998810% True I nterest Cost (T IC) 1.7998 Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 1.7895831% All In clusive Cost ( AIC) 2.15779 IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 1.7900005% Weighted Average Maturity 3.163 Years $1.6 million over 6 years I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 3/16/2012 1 3:42 PM Mor Kee Mid-Atlantic Public Finance '.•- ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F -1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2012 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance authorizing the granting of a temporary construction easement and a permanent easement to Appalachian Power Company on property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors known as Leslie Lane (Tax Map #077.15 -01- 11. gg ), Cave Spring Magisterial District SUBMITTED BY: Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Appalachian Power (AEP) is requesting that the Board of Supervisors sell to it both a temporary construction easement and a permanent easement for the purpose of construction of a quality access road to AEP standards in place of the existing crooked Leslie Lane farm road and also a permanent easement for the construction of a new distribution line and system. This upgraded distribution line and system will serve southwest Roanoke County, Jefferson Hills in Roanoke City and Virginia Western Community College. A drawing entitled "Drawing No. E -SS -33RD Appalachian Power Company Sunscape Entrance" plan prepared by AEP is attached. This plan shows both the location of the temporary easement and the permanent easement across County property. The location of these easements is at the intersection of Leslie Lane and Ogden Road in southwest Roanoke County. The Board of Supervisors previously granted a temporary easement to AEP for certain improvements to Leslie Lane on January 22, 2011. The granting and sale of these easements will provide for additional improvements to this area and to the electrical system serving this part of Roanoke County and Roanoke City. Pagel of 2 The consideration for the sale of these easements by the County to AEP is $7,500 or $2.00 per square foot of the permanent easement. Under Section 10.01 of the Roanoke county Charter, proceeds from the sale of real estate and other capital facilities shall be paid into a capital facilities account and spent from that account only for the acquisition, construction, maintenance, or replacement of other capital facilities. On December 4, 2007, (Action #A- 120407 -1) the Board adopted a policy for the granting of easements across county property. A copy of this policy is attached to this Board report. The purchase price consideration offered to the County by AEP for this permanent easement is not consistent with this adopted Board policy. Applying this policy to this transaction would result in a consideration in excess of $15,000. The existing policy was intended to apply to requests by developers for easements across County park property to benefit private development. The easements requested by AEP will benefit the public at large, and it will cross an existing private road, Leslie Lane, which is encumbered with use rights several private parties. This policy and the various fees (administration and plan review fee, site inspection fee, construction permit fee, reseed inglmuIchinglsodding fee) do not appear to apply to this proposed transaction. FISCAL IMPACT: Consideration for these easements in the amount of $7,500. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the adoption of the attached ordinance at first reading. Authorize the sale of a temporary construction easement and permanent easement to Appalachian Power in exchange for the payment of $7,500. Schedule a second reading and public hearing on this proposed ordinance for April 10, 2012, at 3 pm in the afternoon. Waive the application of County policy for the granting of easements — Action #A-120407-1. 2. Decline to adopt the proposed ordinance granting the conveyance of a temporary and permanent construction easement to Appalachian Power. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative 1. Staff recommends that the Board authorize the sale of the temporary and permanent easements to AEP for the amount of construction offered, $7,500, staff also recommends that the Board agreed to waive the application of County policy for the granting of easements (Action A -1 20407 -1). Staff recommends that the Board schedule a public hearing on this matter for April 10, 2012 at 3 pm in the afternoon. Page 2of2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2012 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE GRANTING OF A TEMPORARY CONSTRUcTiON EASEMENT AND A PERMANENT EASEMENT TO APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY ON PROPERTY OWNED BY THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS KNOWN As LESLIE LANE (TAX MAP ## 077.15 -01- 11.00), CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Appalachian Power Company (AEP) requires a temporary construction easement across Roanoke County property known as Leslie Lane near its intersection with Ogden Road; and WHEREAS, AEP requires a permanent easement across a portion of Roanoke County property known as Leslie Lane near its intersection with Ogden Road for the construction of permanent roadway improvements and the construction of a new electrical distribution line; and WHEREAS, the proposed improvements will serve the interests of the public by the construction of an access road to AEP standards instead of the existing crooked Leslie Lane farm road and also to improve and upgrade the distribution system serving southwest Roanoke County, Jefferson Hills and Virginia Western Community College; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 27, 2012, and the second reading and public hearing was held on April 10, 2012. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by Page 1 of 2 ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on March 27, 2012, and a second reading and public hearing was held on April 10, 2012. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.01 of the Roanoke County Charter, this interest in real estate to be conveyed to AEP is hereby declared to be temporarily surplus, and is hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to AEP for a temporary construction easement. 3. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.01 of the Roanoke County Charter, this interest in real estate to be conveyed to AEP is hereby declared to be surplus, and is hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to AEP for the purpose of a permanent easement for access road improvements to Leslie Lane and the construction of a distribution line. 4. That the sale of this temporary easement and permanent easement to AEP is hereby authorized and approved, and the purchase price of $7,500 is hereby accepted. The proceeds from the sale of these easements are hereby appropriated and paid into a capital facility account and shall be expended solely for the purpose of acquisition, construction, maintenance, or replacement of other capital facilities. 5. That the county Administrator, or any Assistant County Administrator, is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 5. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. Page 2of2 4t/ �I r Cn Z C7 w w Iw- Cn Z Z H Q CD CD z � � cc Z Z V3 (A LLI � LLI M O W W W W Q Q¢ w�Q wa U) C/) N W WOW J W Q T _ w¢ C/) Q Cy) wzvf w¢v�w U N U'3 - - W<Z=< Z - W ~ a � LLJ ' U.. W OMO Z Q II Q §CDM<O M r•woaNw0 cJaro CO vs �Tcn ■ ■ _ CO ccaowm�owm Q M r w m Q H Z CL LU W Z < < }` .. J W Q 2 = cn Z 0 z = D Q =) -JC!]w Q Q "e � CL o z � Q < Q o� U) aC a w aL CL LL 0 v _ = Q T 0 Q T 00 iolj 1 LO T z r � y r-_ VJ 0 0 U WaT z C) r�- aL oz o c zz ['i = f— U m LL CL 2 O o I ■i v Q �.1 C� v T T 1 N 0 LO w 0 CL T LO T Mt N Q w ^ F - J 0 Y U Q cc J W U 0 N N aC W H V) W Z CL ACTION NO. A- 120407 -1 ITEM NO. E -1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE FORMER ROANOKE COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER, 3563 PETERS CREEK ROAD, ROANOKE, VIRGINIA MEETING DATE: AGENDA rrEM: SUBMITTED BY: December 4, 2007 Request to adopt a policy for the granting of easements across County property Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney COUNTY ADMINIS'TRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMNtARY OF INFORMATION: The Board directed County staff to recommend changes in the method for determining the value of easements across County property. Attached is a draft policy for consideration by the Board of Supervisors. Previously, the County had determined the valuation of easements based upon the tax assessment value of the easement reduced by 40 percent. This 40 percent reduction was based upon the belief that underground utilities would have a lesser impact upon the remaining value of the property since the landowner could still enjoy the benefit of the surface use of his/her property. This method was used by the County to acquire water and sewer easements when the utility department was part of the County. During the past year, the county has received several requests for easements across County park property. Neither the Board nor County staff believes that the method described above adequately protects the public's interest in county property. The draft policy would analyze these requests utilizing several factors focusing upon adequate compensation for the use of public property, compatibility with other public uses, an examination of other alternatives, and minimizing harm to the public property. - this policy establishes a fee schedule including administration and plan review, site inspection, and construction permits. It also imposes fees for resodding /mulching /sodding and minimum monetary assurance (bond, letter of credit, cash escrow). This fee schedule also establishes a formula for determining the it permanent easement fee ". This formula is based upon the square foot value of the land based upon the County tax assessment, with a minimum fee of $2.00 per square foot. In the alternative, the County may retain an independent appraiser to determine the value of the easement. Finally, the County should also consider the future revenue producing potential of the proposed non - public use of County land. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt the attached policy for the granting of easements across County property. 2. Continue to use the existing 40 percent reduction from the County tax assessment formula. 3. Direct staff to develop a different policy. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider the adoption of the attached policy. VOTE: Supervisor Altizer motion to approve staff recommendation Motion Approved cc: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Peter Haislip, Director, Parks, Recreation and Tourism Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Billy Driver, Director, Real Estate Valuation Anne Marie Green, Director, General Services Rebecca Owen, Director, Finance Terrie Cochran, Executive Secretary Yes No Abs Mr. Wray z ❑ 1:1 Mr. Church F Mr. Altizer z El ❑ Mr. Flora F F Mr. McNamara 1:1 F cc: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Peter Haislip, Director, Parks, Recreation and Tourism Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Billy Driver, Director, Real Estate Valuation Anne Marie Green, Director, General Services Rebecca Owen, Director, Finance Terrie Cochran, Executive Secretary POLICY FOR THE GRANTING OF EASEMENTS ACROSS COUNTY PROPERTY Roanoke County shall require adequate compensation for the use of County property for other than public purposes based upon the extent of the impact, the sensitivity of impacted areas, the loss or diminution of future public uses and length of time that County activities may be disrupted. Roanoke County shall consider request for easements by private parties for non- public uses of County land only under the following conditions: 1, Where the County has determined that the proposed use or facility is compatible with other planned or existing public uses and the subject site, or 2. When it has been determined that there is no feasible or prudent alternative to the use of County property for this specified purpose; and 3. All possible planning to minimize harm is included in the proposed project. In addition the County shall require monetary assurances (e.g. bond, letter of credit, cash escrow) of the requesting agency, corporation, and/or individual to insure compliance with easement requirements including restoration of impacted areas. The County shall also consider the future revenue producing potential of the proposed non - public use of County land. The County Administrator or his designee is authorized to develop minimum requirements for easement plans, site or project plan requirements, and restoration plans for easement requests. The Board hereby establishes the following schedule of fees and charges, which are in addition to the County's development review and inspection fees, for easements across County property: Administration and plan review fee $1 ,000 Permanent easement fee Determined by the following formula ($2.00 per square foot minimum). Formula is "Permanent Easement Fee" = Roanoke County tax assessment value /square feet X Total Area of Easement (square feet). Temporary Construction Easement Fee The greater amount of $0.50 /sq. ft. or 50% of the Permanent Easement Fee Site inspection fee $50 /hour (maximum of 10 hours included in Construction Permit Fee Construction permit fee $1,000 Monetary assurance minimum $5,000 Reseed in /mulchin /sodd ing fees $5/$5/$10 pe r sq uare ya nd In the alternative when determining the permanent easement fee, the County may retain an independent appraiser to determine the valuation of the easement. The County may also consider in -kind public improvements in lieu of the payment of the permanent easement fee. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. G -1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2012 AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: Ordinance amending Section 23 -3.4. "Stormwater management facility maintenance agreements" of Chapter 23. "Stormwater Management" of the Roanoke County Code Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This is the second reading of an ordinance to amend the Stormwater Management chapter of the Roanoke County Code. The first reading was held on September 13, 2011. This amendment imposes additional obligations on developers for bonding, maintenance, inspection and notification of homeowners associations (HOAs) for stormwater detention facilities. A public hearing was held on January 24, 2012. Roanoke County environmental engineers have been inspecting stormwater detention facilities throughout the County. Inspection reports identifying deficiencies and maintenance or repair obligations have been prepared and sent to the owners and responsible parties, including HOAs. Many of the HOA representatives have claimed that they had no knowledge of these responsibilities. During community and civic association meetings, many citizens have requested that the County require the developer to notify them of any transfer of responsibility for these stormwater facilities. Many citizens have complained that the stormwater facility has deteriorated due to lack of maintenance by the developer. After the first reading of this ordinance staff met on October 19, 2011, with the Roanoke Regional Homebuilders Association (RRHBA), explained the background and purpose of this ordinance, provided examples of problems which the ordinance is designed to address, and answered questions. The RRHBA provided a written response to this proposal on December 1, 2011. County staff and the RRHBA met again on February 8, 2012, to clarify issues, explore alternatives and to refine further this proposed ordinance. Page 1 of 2 Builders, developers and engineers offered suggestions, which were analyzed in consideration of the problems and issues that prompted the consideration of this ordinance. The revisions to this ordinance incorporate many of the suggestions of the RRH BA This ordinance, which has been revised since the first reading, attempts to address several of these complaints by requiring (i) a maintenance guaranty or security in the amount of twenty percent (20 %) of the original construction cost or minimum HOA funding based upon number of lots in the development, (ii) inspection of the facility by the County before transfer of maintenance responsibility; (iii) requirements for transfer of maintenance responsibilities to an HOA; and (iv) a meeting with the HOA and County staff prior to transfer of maintenance responsibility. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board favorably consider the adoption of - this ordinance. Page 2of2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2012 ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 23 -3.4. "STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS" OF CHAPTER 23. "STORMWATER MANAGEMENT" OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors finds that many storm water detention facilities are not being maintained and that this poses a threat to public health and safety; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors finds that many homeowners' associations are not notified of their maintenance responsibilities by developers; and WHEREAS, the Board finds that measures to insure maintenance of such facilities such as notification, bonding or other forms of security would alleviate many of these maintenance failures; and WHEREAS, this ordinance has been developed with the assistance and recommendations of the Roanoke Regional Home Builders Association; and WHEREAS, this ordinance is authorized by the Virginia Stormwater Management Law in Title 10.1 of the Code of Virginia; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 13, 2011 the public hearing was held on January 24, 2012, and the second reading was held on March 27, 2012. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County as follow: 1. That Section 23 -3.4. of Chapter 23. Stormwater Management be amended to read and provide as follows: Page 1 of 3 Sec. 23 -3.4. — Stormwater management facility maintenance agreements. Prior to the issuance of any permit that has a stormwater management facility as one of the requirements of the permit, the permittee or owner of the site must execute an access easement agreement and a formal maintenance covenant that shall be binding on all subsequent owners of land served by the stormwater management faci I ity. (1) Access easement agreement. a. The access easement agreement shall provide for access to stormwater management facilities at reasonable times for periodic inspection by the county, or their contractor or agent, and for regular assessments of land owners to ensure that the facility is maintained in proper working condition to meet design standards and any other provisions established by this chapter. The easement agreement shall be recorded by the county in the land records. b. When any new stormwater management facility is installed on private property, or when any new connection is made between private property and a public storm drainage system, duly authorized employees, agents, or representatives of the county shall be authorized to enter any public or private property at any reasonable time for the purpose of inspection. This includes the right to enter a property when it has a reasonable basis to believe that a violation of this chapter is occurring or has occurred, and to enter when necessary for abatement of a public nuisance or correction of a violation of this chapter. (2) Maintenance covenants. a. Maintenance of all stormwater management facilities shall be ensured through the creation of a formal maintenance covenant that must be approved by county and recorded into the land record prior to final plan approval. The covenant shall identify by name or official title the person(s) responsible for carrying out the maintenance. b. Responsibility for the operation and maintenance of stormwater management facilities, unless assumed by a governmental agency, shall remain with the property owner and shall pass to any successor or owner. If portions of the land are to be sold, legally binding arrangements shall be made to pass the basic responsibility to successors in title. These arrangements shall designate for each land owner, governmental agency, or other legally established entity to be permanently responsible for maintenance. C. As part of the covenant, a schedule shall be developed for when and how often maintenance will occur to ensure proper function of the stormwater management facility. The covenant shall also include plans for periodic inspections to ensure proper Page 2of3 performance of the facility between scheduled maintenance and should also include "failure to maintain" provisions. d. In the event that maintenance or repair is neglected, or the stormwater management facility becomes a danger to public health, safety, or the environment, the county reserves the authority to perform the work and to recover the costs from the land owner. (3) Release of Performance Security: a. Prior to the release of the performance security or bond provided in Sec. 23 -3.5 the developer shall either (1) Transfer the Maintenance Responsibilities of the SWM facility to the HOA or (2) provide the County with a Maintenance Security. 1. Requirements for Transfer of Maintenance Responsibilities to the HOA i. Request and Pass a final inspection of the SWM facility by county staff. ii. Transfer the necessary property to the HOA iii. Provide the County with a copy of the recorded documents establishing the HOA iv. Provide the County with evidence that the HOA is funded. Minimum funding shall be based on the following schedule: 1 -20 lots = $1,000 21 -50 lots = $1,500 51 and over = $1500 + 30 per lot v. Request a meeting with the county and HOA. 2. Requirements for Posting Maintenance Security. i. The countv shall reauire a maintenance auaranty in the amount of twenty (20 %) percent of the construction costs of the SWM Facility_ ii. The maintenance security shall contain forfeiture provisions for failure, after proper notice, to complete work within the time specified, or to initiate or maintain appropriate actions which may be required of the permittee in accordance with the approved stormwater management plan. iii. If the county takes such action upon such failure by the permittee, the count ma y collect from the permittee the difference should the amount of the reasonable cost of such action exceed the amount of the security held. iv. The maintenance covenant and security will be the responsibility of the permittee or owner until such time as the permittee or owner provides the county _with the necessary requirements for Transfer of Maintenance Responsibilities to the HOA as outlined above in (1)_ 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption. Page 3of3 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. H.1 -3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2012 AGENDA ITEM: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards SUBMITTED BY: Deborah C. Jacks Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman I I I County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY of INFORMATION: 1. Board of Zoning Appeals (appointed by District) After serving 35 years, Carlton Wright has advised he does not wish to be re- appointed. His term will expire June 30, 2012. Mr. Wright represents the Hollins magisterial district. Kevin Barnes, who represents the Cave Spring magisterial district, has advised he has accepted a job out of State and Can only serve until June 2012. His term expires June 30, 2014. 2. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Review Committee (appointed by District) The following one -year term expired on August 31, 2011: a) James M. Chewning representing the Vinton Magisterial District, one -year term will expire on August 31, 2011 3. Roanoke County Community Leaders Environmental Action Roundtable (RCCLEAR) Bryan Pittenger, who represents the Hollins Magisterial District, has resigned. His term of office is due to expire on August 31, 2012. Page 1 of 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2012 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I- CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for March 27, 2012, designated as Item 1 Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 4 inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of minutes — February 14, 2012; February 28, 2012 2. Confirmation of appointment to the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals (Fire Code Board of Appeals) (appointed at large); Economic Development Authority (appointed at large) 3. Resolution dedicating as right -of -way for public use a portion of property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, tax parcel #038.10- -01 -01 4. Resolution requesting acceptance of Castle View Court into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 1 -2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF "rHE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2612 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of appointments to the Building Code Board of Adjustments (Fire Code Board of Appeals) (appointed at large); Economic Development Authority (appointed at large) SUBMITTED BY: Deborah C. Jacks Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMA 1. Building code Board of Adjustments (Fire Code Board of Appeals) (appointed at large) During closed session on February 28, 2612, the Board asked the Clerk to contact the following to see if they would be interested in serving an additional term: David Jones, term to expire April 27, 2612 Richard Evans, term to expire April 13, 2612 Both gentlemen have agreed to serve an additional four year term to expire as follows: David Jones — April 27, 2616 Richard Evans — April 13, 2616 2. Economic Development Authority (appointed at large): During the closed meeting on February 28, 2612, Supervisor Elswick recommended the appointment of Ssunny Shah to represent the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. Mr. Shah's term will expire on September 26, 2614. Confirmation of these appointments has been placed on the consent agenda. Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 1 -3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: March 27, 2012 Resolution dedicating as right-of-way for public use a portion of property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, tax parcel #038.10 -01 -01 David Holladay Planning Administrator B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator w-- (Oky COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The county of Roanoke requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution dedicating 0.2157 acres as right -of -way for public use. This property is a portion of tax parcel #038.10- 01 -07, owned by the Board of Supervisors, and adjoining John Richardson Road. On April 12, 2011, the Board of Supervisors approved a resolution supporting removal of the bridge over Carvins Creek on John Richardson Road and construction of a cul -de -sac. The new cul -de -sac will be constructed on property owned by the Board of Supervisors. Construction and maintenance of the new cul -de -sac by Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requires dedication of the right -of -way for public use. Since this project does not create a new subdivision street, or extend existing John Richardson Road, VDOT only requires the dedication and recordation of right of way, rather than the typical acceptance procedures for new subdivision streets. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Existing revenue sharing funds of $249,640 applied to the project are expected to cover the construction costs. Page 1 of 2 AL'rERNATIVES: 1. Adopt a resolution dedicating as right of way for public use a portion of property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, tax parcel #038.16-01-01 2. Take no action at this time. STAFF RECOM M EN DA"rION: Staff recommends Alternative 1. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OR ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2012 RESOLUTION DEDICATING AS RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR PUBLIC USE A PORTION OF PROPERTY OWNED BY THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, TAX PARCEL #038.18 -01 -07 WHEREAS, John Richardson Road, Route 743 in the Commonwealth of Virginia System of Secondary Roads, was closed to through traffic on September 12, 2007, due to deteriorating conditions of a bridge over Carvins Creek, and WHEREAS, on April 12, 2011, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors approved a resolution supporting removal of the bridge over Carvins Creek and construction of a cul- de -sac, and WHEREAS, the new cul -de -sac will be constructed on property owned by the Board of Supervisors, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors as follows: 1. That the Board dedicates as right of way for public use a portion of property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, consisting of 0.2157 acres, and being a portion of tax parcel #038.10- 01 -07, as shown on the attached plat prepared by the Roanoke county Department of community Development dated February 21, 2012, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County. 2. That the new right of way will be maintained by the Virginia Department Of Transportation as part of existing Secondary Route #743. 3. That the Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted rig ht -of -way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage. 4. That this Resolution shall be effective from and after the date of its adoption. Page 1 of 2 5. That a certified copy of this Resolution be forwarded to the Residency Administrator for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Page 2 of 2 LINE TABLE LINE BEARING LENGTH L I S25 °46'39'E 20.28' L2 N IS " 14 '26'E 21.47" L3 N71 "W 21.32' L4 S25 °42 '24 'E 19.05 ' CURVE TABLE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS TANGENT CHORD BEARI Tax# 38.16 -01 -09 & 38.16 -01 -10 �'y• C1 172.83' 55.00' 8, 745.45' N6J °52'06" ARROWPOINT ASSET SS6'S , p5 »E GROUP LLG INSTRU. # 2011OJ948 A j S9. N� %'� 50 , app• 1.32 AC. & 0.09 AC. PROD: 0743 - 080 -322 Tax# 38.16— 01— 07 Tax# 38.16 -01 -09 & 38.16 -01 -10 �'y• JOHN RICHARDSON ROAD Z m O /� / REMOVE BRIDGE AND INSTALL CUL —DE —SAC co o;�' / PROPERTY TO BE DEDICATED 0 0 jt // / Z / � RIGHT OF WAY ,\ AS RIGHT-OF- WA Y FOR PUBLIC USE No // / / / 55' RADIUS —\ G S63'1 2'05 "W 15.35'-- 9,394.30 S.F. , 0.2 I S7Ac. NG CHORD DELTA E 110.00' 180'02'44 " ROANOKE COUNTY APPROXIMATE LOCATION 100 —YEAR BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FLOOD ELEVATION NO ENCROACHMENT BELOW THIS ELEVATION. /INSTRU # 201006140 _ m ,4y�� 9.766 A C. � o �� 0� O � PROD: 0743 - 080 -322 Tax# 38.16— 01— 07 C D �'y• JOHN RICHARDSON ROAD Z m O /� / REMOVE BRIDGE AND INSTALL CUL —DE —SAC co o;�' / PROPOSED 30' PRESCRIPTIVE R/W 0 0 jt // / Z / � RIGHT OF WAY ,\ o � .& No // / / / 55' RADIUS —\ G S63'1 2'05 "W 15.35'-- m / PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT / PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY r / Q/ / /• o/ S63'1 2'05 "W 16.21' o / EXISTING BRIDGE, PAVEMENT O/ / AND CURB AND GUTTER V / TO BE REMOVED. rn 00 d V- / / 22 L F ST'D. GR - 2 / r 2 / / GUARDRAIL REQ D S ( / / M � � 58.3 .Ju - - i p „ C / G 1 14-7 �pg,p0 PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED 1 c �'� �N ��� APPROXIMATE LOCATION 100 —YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION NO ENCROACHMENT BELOW THIS ELEVATION. w 1 1 'oy •��+ ` `' c+ n ^tn Lp in o 1 . 7 i �L N EXHIBIT jai S o, / 20. S PLAT SHOWING o -- / / /� D ' e • 550 S ewe r / // PG 166 ase -�., PORTION OF TAX MAP # 38.16 -01 -07.00 0) S / REQUESTED BY co LOREILIOBENSHAINMARTIN BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, ROANOKE COUNTY & WALTER M. MARTIN DB869 PG467 TO BE DEDICATED AS p ANp 0.6 AC. Tax# J8.15— 01 -11 8 8 . 15 (S 69• RIGHT -OF -WAY 4 40 " E FOR E-4 Z �S ANTHONY E. EMMONS PUBLIC USE �o t� I & V IC KY S. EMMONS HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT 183a 2 Inst. # 020017252 °'' Ta x# 4 0202 01 ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA 3 9� SCALE: 1"= 50 DATE: FEBRUARY 21, 2012 6 J PREPARED BY ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 1 -4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEE'T'ING DATE: AGENDA rrEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: March 27, 2912 Resolution requesting acceptance of Castle View Court into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System Arnold Covey Director of Community Development 74 W 4 104 C�� B. Clayton Goodman County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Park Place Developers, Inc., the developer of the Hills at Castle Rock, located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requesting that they accept 9.14 mile of Castle View Court from the intersection with Brahma Road (VA Sec. Rte 1589) to the end of its cul -de -sac. The staff has inspected this road along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation and finds the road is acceptable. FISCAL IMPACT: No county funding is required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to VDOT requesting that they accept Castle View Court into the Secondary Road System. Page 1 of 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2012 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF CASTLE VIEW COURT INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Addition Form AM -4.3, fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the representative for the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) h as advised this Board that the street(s) meet the requirements established by the Virginia Department of Transportation's Subdivision Street Regtiirements; and WHEREAS, the County and the Virginia Department of Transportation have entered into an agreement on March 9, 1999, for comprehensive stormwater detention which applies to this request for addition. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the street(s) described on the attached Additions Form AM -4.3 to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1 -229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, after receiving a copy of this resolution and all outstanding fees and documents required of the developer, whichever occurs last in time. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right- of -way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage; and BE IT F U R`rH E R RESOLVED, that a certified copy of th is resolution be forwarded to the Residency Administrator for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Page 1 of 1 Ne E�J4.� �-�►��4 Ire'" ��4 L7 Ark` __YLC1A=1EMAJ! II II L4) " PROPOSEDADDITION(S) IN GREY ! EX. 7 ar ' rc �► j LOT I 0.244 AC �T 2 4 AC 1 DESCRIPTION LENGTH Row WIDTH SERVICES Miles Feet Feet Houses Castle View Court; From Brahma Road (route 1 689) to the end of it's cul -de -sac 9.14 40 28 16 ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF CASTLE VIEW COURT INTO THE DEPARTMENT OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COMMUNITY DEVLOPMENT SECONDARY SYSTEM le_<N Ldp Y9a � ,'� ':. • LET 18A -�� LOT Tart! / S.M.Ar. 18 (AT I eA P b. 24. PG 131) �1T I5A -1A__ A C S. W,,9. 11�9771��1 ---------------------------------------- In_the_County_of Roanoke --------------------------------------- ------------- By resolution of the governing body adopted March 27, 2012 The, following VDOT Form AM - -4.3 is hereby attached and incorporated as part of the governing body's resolution, for changes in the secondary system of state highways. A Copy Testee Signed (County Official): Report of Changes in the Secondary System of State Highways Project/Subdivision Hills At Castle Rock Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Addition The following additions to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to the statutory provision or provisions cited, are hereby requested; the right of way for which, including additional easements for cuts, fills and drainage, as required, is hereby guaranteed: Reason for Change: New subdivision street Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: §33.1 -223 StrVet Name and/pr Route N m er Castle View Court, State Route Number 1464 Old Route Number: 0 • From: Int. Route 1689 To: End, Cul -de -sac, a distance of: 0.14 miles. Recordation Reference: P.B. 29, Page 114 Right of Way width (feet) = 40 VDOT Form AM -43 (4'2012007) Maintcnancc Division Date of Resolution: March 27, 2012 Page l of l GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Audited balance at June 30, 2011 Addition of 2010-11 operations Balance at March 27, 2012 Amount $ 20 500,000 M -1 % of General Fund Revenue 10.59% * $ 20 1 0 .57% ** Note: On December 21, 2004, the Board of Supervisors adopted a policy to increase the General Fund Unappropriated Balance incrementally over several years. * 2010 - 11 a range of 10.0 % - 11.0 % of General Fund Revenues 2010 -11 General Fund Revenues $189 10.0 % of General Fund Revenues $1 8,951,81 11.0 % of General Fund Revenues $20,858,000 ** 201 1 -12 - Goal of 11 % of General Fund Revenues 2011-12 General Fund Revenues $192 11 % of General Fund Revenues $21 The Unappropriated Fund Balance of the County is currently maintained at 10.67 %. The County's goal is to increase the balance over time to 11.0% Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator �� M -2 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL RESERVES Minor County Capital Reserve (Projects not in the CIP, architectural /engineering services, and other one -time expenditures.) Amount Audited balance at June 30, 2011 $2,088,664.88 Addition of 201 0 -1 1 operations $1 August 23, 2011 Purchase of .454 acre of real estate adjacent to the Roanoke County (40,000.00) Administration Center from Franklin Real Estate Company September 13, 2011 Appropriate funds for the repair of retaining wall at Vinton Library (17,225.00) Balance at March 27, 2012 $3 Maior County Capital Reserve (Projects in the CIP, debt payments to expedite projects identified in CIP, and land purchase opportunities.) Audited balance at June 30, 2011 $162,539.00 Addition of 201 0 -1 1 operations $775,622.00 Balance at March 27, 2012 $938 Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By B. Clayton Goodman III W4 County Administrator M -3 RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount From 2011-2012 Original Budget $ 100 May 24, 2011 Appropriation for Legislative Liaison (31,020.00) December 13, 2011 Appropriation to remove the delapidated carport structure and install a new roof (10,000.00) at 5915 Garner Road January 24, 2012 Appropriation for assessment for Appalachian Power Company (APCo) negotiatioi (4,889.35) Balance at March 27, 2012 Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance $ 54,090-65 Approved By B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER M -4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER. MEETING DATE: March 27, 2012 AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of February 29, 2012. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: CASH INVESTMENT: SU NTRUST CON 6 6 GOVERNMENT: SMITH BARNEY CONTRA 83 SMITH BARNEY 62 WELLS FARGO 16,000 WELLS FARGO CONTRA 12 78,114,914.63 LOCAL GOV'T INVESTMENT POOL: 3 21,582,112.14 GENERAL OPERATION 17,118,333.16 17 CD: BRANCH BANKING & TRUST 4,000,000.00 4 MONEY MARKET: BRANCH BANKING & TRUST 1 MORGAN STANLEY - JAIL 1,101,053.93 SMITH BARNEY 15,194,680.55 STELLAR ONE 1,038,455.53 WELLS FARGO 3 21,582,112.14 TOTAL 126, 821, 822.73 03/27/2012 N O N o � C LL a) sir' I` 00 M (D LO r LO (D r O (D r 00 (D (D 00 CD 00 N LO M O 00 CA LO M I` N CO O r r (D O (D I` It M N f` ti M LO NT 00 00 V- 6 (D 14 d6 O O N 00 N N O (D I` f` O 6 4 6 (D N r r r N r O r N r r r (D N 00 M O LA O r 00 � O M O O N M (D O NT r LO � 00 N N N 00 r r t Lr) O O U') LO (fl r (D 00 (D O M N (D 00 (D N O M � N N tD f` 00 (D (D f` r (D O CA 1` LO 00 CA r LO I` M LO I` CD r N LO LO (D r I` Ldp I` N ti 00 f` 00 N M r I` 00 O r I` N tD M O r r N N r M M r r c0 i 00 (D � r N O I` N N r � C O U') 00 CA f` I� 00 I` 00 M O O 'IT � M 00 O a� a to N I` Nt N O LO M 00 0) O I` pp O L[) O ' L O N O N O 00 6 p N I` I` CD O _N c6 O N d; M to (D I` M V a LO LO O r (D � to N 4) o LO I� ti M E- a � � LO LO LO Ln (D r LSD d N m 1` M N t- LA M f` M 00 C N I` LO O > It O L N r I` ' 75 N � r L U 00 � CA N O CA N � a� N LO 00 LO (D N O 1` d7 I` qqr 'IT r LO d r CA � ti (D 00 00 I` m It M (D N M O _ r 00 ti r W M I` M R:f CD O LSD 00 O w .O O m o O 0 N N d � lq +� Ltd > m (D CC r CA I` CA C I` 'IT U Cl) p qm Lr) p CO 4) d 'IT r IT (D s It a) N r Z L O LL L N >' M CL N d a E L N � r L. N U a LO N V (D L N i--' O 0 L � O � le m N O N o � C LL a) sir' I` 00 M (D LO r LO (D r O (D r 00 (D (D 00 CD 00 N LO M O 00 CA LO M I` N CO O r r (D O (D I` It M N f` ti M LO NT 00 00 V- 6 (D 14 d6 O O N 00 N N O (D I` f` O 6 4 6 (D N r r r N r O r N r r r (D N 00 M O LA O r 00 � O M O O N M (D O NT r LO � 00 N N N 00 r r t Lr) O O U') LO (fl r (D 00 (D O M N (D 00 (D N O M � N N tD f` 00 (D (D f` r (D O CA 1` LO 00 CA r LO I` M LO I` CD r N LO LO (D r I` Ldp I` N ti 00 f` 00 N M r I` 00 O r I` N tD M O r r N N r M M r r c0 i 00 (D � r N p I` � N r O O U') 00 CA f` I� 00 I` 00 M O O 'IT � M 00 M r to M I` Nt N O LO M 00 0) O I` pp O L[) O O O N O N O 00 6 p N I` I` CD O 00 c6 O N d; M to (D I` M O O L6 LO O r (D � to N LS") LO LO I� ti M r (fl � LO LO LO Ln (D r LSD I� 1` M N t- LA M f` M 00 O N I` LO O O It O CA N r I` I` 00 N d) 00 � CA qq O CA N (D LO 00 LO (D N O 1` d7 I` qqr 'IT r LO (D r CA � ti (D 00 00 I` I` It M (D N M 00 CA r 00 ti r LO lq M I` M R:f CD O LSD 00 O M LSD d) O � N N (D lq lq Ltd M 'IT 00 (D 00 r CA I` CA 'IT I` 'IT 'IT r qm Lr) p CO C: 'IT r IT (D f` It a) LL r q;T O N >' M � N r C7 N � r O N a) N LO N V (D L N i--' O 0 L � O � le LL c N x N U N x C - c J O O O O O p o O O o O O o O O O O p o LO LO o o O O O O O O O O q;T O O O O O O O O O qq O I` N r O O O O O O O M O O O O O O O O O M O CA 'IT c� N O O O LO O lx O lq O Lo Lo O Lo O Lo O r Lr) (fl 00 O 0 a) M � O M (D I` 00 (D I` r 00 p O N ti q;T LO (D I` LO N LO N O I` O r (D I` I� M (D O r CM tD LO U') (D 'IT 00 r- N lq a) M Lo N r M M cn C/) VJ Q 00 N E in r � O J H c O w O U (D LO 0 (D � ti M C5) O (D O (D r M M (5) M co I� M -Fu CLn— O r M O r N 1` N N r O LO co O CA 00 It LO M 00 O � ti LO O � M O M O 00 (D O 4 Oi Cb d6 O O (D O 4 di O ti Cb (D 4 O 4 Ldp LO O LO It I* (D LO LO (D N 'IT 'IT 'IT LO LO Le) M N It r 'IT � r U U m U- 2 0 L Q J a- L.L_ 00 r LO I` O (D O � (D N It O LO I` (D N f` 00 O LO M (D r LO (D O r (3) M 00 M LSD CA M r O N It N M co 1` (D CA I� M 00 M (D 00 (D I` N r O r (D r I` N M r M t N r O N r 00 I` I` O M 00 00 M O M N (D I` LO 00 LO (D r 'IT O I` (D CA 00 N O LO � I` O 00 r r M Lr) ti r I` CA 0) O O 00 (D M qq C LO O r I` q;T LO N q;T O N r N N r N r F N M M M N LO N M O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 o O O O (D o O O o O O o O O O O (D o O O o (D O O O O O O O O O O O p O o O O O LO N o O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O Ln N o O O 00 O Ldp r O I` M LO O O LO O p O O r O LO O I` LO LO O r qlzi 00 0) O f` O LO d) 00 (D (D (D (D 00 r to N O CA (D LO (D (D q;T � ti M r CA � N N LO M CA M qm O r 00 p r I 'IT r I` I` N r M 00 M L6 r r C6 M (1) co N TMM N c a) LL °6 X U A L a) cn CL —>> O a) > (n a- (1) N c a) LL °6 X U m m C: (� ~ t6 O F --- a) ch O O a) Cn 4-- X C: } ' LL a) LL cn cn >' O O � X O a) a) (D L cn i--' O 0 L m O � LL c N x N U N x C - c J O 0� L— U- L a) m O O X a) U a) ca O — v � 4.0 N / 06 c >, CU c� c� J v_ � O 0 0 m O 4-a LL L L 0 a) L � a) L X X O >1 cn C/) VJ Q E in .- � O J H c O w O U E - 0 U L N N L (a (� + r O U -Fu CLn— �, a E 'cn ° x= � X L- o O o a a) a) O O O :3 Co +r O to +r J C to a) a) � U U m U- 2 0 L Q J a- L.L_ U a- d _ C� O O 'IT CA O r N M qq LO (D I` 00 0) O O r N qq ti 00 r � � V N N N N N N N N N N F M M M M M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N � ;�r r d LO N c0 O � r � CA It (Q f` O O O 00 O p a) M m (C) 4- O a� a LO N t") LO r r M I` r O N M O O cl O p ' L r f` O 1� 00 I` c0 N r O to _N 00 LO N (D O O p O p CD LO V a M LO M (D LO CD r 00 4) O -' d (D LO LO = o � CD Re Re ti ti r O d N m r N N O 00 O 00 r 00 r 00 > O to > M O p LO r M I� (D L O � O ' 70 N � r L U LO f� 'T V � N � O r � aC4 N a) (` ' ti 00 LO (D M (D f` d O N 00 LO N O c0 N N 00 m O tm M a M f` O _ N co r- W O O L1) f` M r (D N O OC .° O �, m o O 0 N f` d q +� CA > m r � O r M N O }' oo U Cl) p N r 4) d M N (D r S r N L O LL L d CL N > E L O �•�/ �+ N O . N U a O O O O O O (D d CD O O LO Lt) O LO O O O O O LCD LO Lt) m N_ O N � o � C7 °c LL L a) sir' r (C) tD O) N 4 4 O 00 1` 00 (C) 00 LA � O � N M O � le O O r � le "T "T r 00 LO O I` 00 f` 1` CC) r NT M r O M to O O O 00 06 00 O N M O r 4 L6 M M O N M N O r ti O O ' O r r M r CC) LO ' N ' ' N ' c0 LO LA CC) � r CA � M O (D CA 1` LO I` f` f` O CA (D M O O I* N N LO N Qo O LO Lt) r O it tD (D M f� I� r � r - CD CF) r r N LO 1` � � cA N I` 00 O It O O 00 I` N CA to CD ti O M I` (D m � 00 1` 00 O L1) M � L1) f` 00 to M O to ' ' r (D ti N tD r ' r M N N r r N (D tD CD LO LO ;�r r N LO N c0 O O r LO CA It LO f` O O O 00 O p a) M m (C) LO r LO � t") LO r r M I` r O N M O O cl O p a) r r f` O 1� 00 I` c0 N r O to O 00 LO N (D O O p O p CD LO Lt) M ' M (D LO CD r 00 M N (D LO LO LO LO CD Re Re ti ti r O N r r N N O 00 O 00 r 00 r 00 CA O to O O M O p LO r M I� (D M O � O M (D LO f� 'T M � O r N M O a) (` ' ti 00 LO (D M (D f` 00 O N 00 LO N O c0 N N 00 00 O a M f` r 00 N co r- r O O L1) f` M r (D N N d) p O N N f` N q CA M r r O r M N r N r r M N (D r O r N N N N N r N 00 O O O O O O (D O CD O O LO Lt) O LO O O O O O LCD LO Lt) T" O O O O O N O N O N O N O O O r O O O p CD O I` 1` (D O tD 00 M M O 00 O N O r r r Lt) L1) '� LO M 00 O 00 00 O L1) f` t") O (D O LO O w LS) ') M M (D tD O q* 00 q- ti p � N LO � � r N N ') 00 00 N N N N (D r - M L1) 00 O I` tD O G) M M r M r M r N N N N N LO 'IT ti M � I* � N Lt) Lt) N O 00 O � O O .4 O O le M M r (D O "T LO M O M O ti O r LO d) (D O O co O O Q; r r r N N N L6 N N o0 f` Lt's f` 1 4 ti r r O O O O tD CD tD M r M (D LO to M N N le LO CD CA LO CD f` r r ' tD M M f` LO M N I` c0 N I` O c0 M O (D f` 00 O f` G) O O 00 N N O O r I� O 1` O q;T � p O 00 LO r � O P M r r O LO Ln M r CA O 00 r- O M f` N O ti Ln (C) co C)j � t'7 (fl 1` LO LS) N r- (D N N r to N N O r N N O I` M r o0 M M LO LO � p M L1) W) r r O to N N r CD N (D f` O r M r r N N r N o0 tD O T" O O O O O O O O O O LO O O O Le) O O N N O N N I* O O f� O O O O r O O O O 1` O O G) � Re M O O O O O I` O ti O N r M O O O O O Lo Ln tD 00 co O '-T d' LO 00 M N r (D p � � O O O CD N � U Q a +r U w - 0 Q U 'L O � U L + r O tD N N N Lf) LO LO LO 00 C'7 N r 00 M O r O N O N Re W) 00 00 M r ' M O 00 ' r CC) N I-T C LO r 00 O 'IT N 00 O 00 G? M M O O O M O M O O O r O It N N M O O N N 4 N N N 4-j N cn d N 0 v ) J L O L.L ca to LL CD N �_ U- E a N a) L �= p N U- 0 O N cn E O � O 0� o a- `~ O N O N � 0 O 0� O L a 'a c 0 c cn N U • L- L- O 0) U cn U '> N co U - L- O N CM U N O v �> cl) ° N a, U (n cn E CM O � - a N t6 • N O O > (1) cn � O (L) N N O U -0 N O N aD � Q (a (•� '� 0 0 to U O z 0 O c- � J N U) U CA O •L O U) — (_6 • U O U) 06 N (6 N Q to U • L 0) 4. U O m (n L +r O cn N U •> O U) m • U O U) 0S N t6 N CD N � U Q a +r U w - 0 Q U 'L O � U L + r O d > � a) LL C cn cn N L � (n 0 c i C •U O C: Cl) c_ c IL c L � j O L O O O H M O H O 'T r ' O H N 'T 00 ' O H O LO r Lt) (D Lt) O H O (D r (D � (D M I� O 00 N 00 O 00 O H N O O) H O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O N � M O � oc r` 1` p N N to (V N O 00 Co O O O I` 1` G) a) co N N ti N N r M p N N G7 M ti 1�- ti ti M CA G) N � r M 00 ti qq 4 M M 1` O O M (D tD LO 00 00 N CD Q7 r C) ° o Qoo o CD °� V- r f` 1 M O O 0o ti ti O N N CD ti I` 1` r O (D N I` 1` CD N to TIm N r N p r fA W N L r N � F- F () F- f► C) LL a) i N � N � � (Q O a� a N ' L N V Q LO 4) O d = o � d N m L ' 70 N � r L U V � N a N .he M O _ LU O .O m o 0 O m m O ♦"� 0o U Cl) p 4) d S L O LL L d CL E �+ O .O L. U a d m N O N � M O � oc r` 1` p N N to (V N O 00 Co O O O I` 1` G) a) co N N ti N N r M p N N G7 M ti 1�- ti ti M CA G) N � r M 00 ti qq 4 M M 1` O O M (D tD LO 00 00 N CD Q7 r C) ° o Qoo o CD °� V- r f` 1 M O O 0o ti ti O N N CD ti I` 1` r O (D N I` 1` CD N to TIm N r N p r fA W N L r N � F- F () F- f► C) LL a) i � O oc C U- L d i l-- N I a1 \O O O o0 M O t t- O l-- � to 1--+ C� 01 \0 � �z `O INC t� M 't N� O� 00 `O O � ---a M kn O M kn r \c .--� t O N r kn O O ---a ^-� `O l- It 01 kn M M N `O `O kn N O 01 N O M � r- � N N � M M kn a1 It kn t- kn kn 00 `O kn 00 O `O N N N M 00 N N ---a N It M � 01 N \C ---a .--a l- M fn oo 01 O N kn M r--I T d \O M N � a1 � N O M O 00 01 kn kn r- a •L N M In M � N > ---a r- O O IO O �T N N r- a� O r- v C\ `0 00 M kn O a � l-- • L kn a\ M 00 kn _N O l� � M 00 l ^� rl kn V a C� o0 N o0 M t� M O O M o m �T a1 N M 01 � O O r N M T O I�t X _ W W m N M L C1 C1 �t 0 °tf l-- to `O M t- kn N O N M O O N M kn N o0 _ V N � o0 N � V O N �t o0 L O kn M 00 \O r- kn M O kn \O M N L N r_ x C W W O kr� `O L 00 C7 01 T 00 O 00 lzt� 00 kn l- 3 v r \c .-� W N C � •� I%O �T O M o0 O I�t N M M � a1 M INC 00 oc r- / L � N `O M N M kn 0 � W 00 0 0 0 N N O W a O @ M N = a 0 p O X m W W fA O v co o ca �, U) LJL O O W � • L W a E c �+ m L E O u � O oc C U- L d i l-- N I a1 \O O O o0 M O t t- O l-- � to 1--+ C� 01 \0 � �z `O INC t� M 't N� O� 00 `O O � ---a M kn O M kn r \c .--� t O N r kn O O ---a ^-� `O l- It 01 kn M M N `O `O kn N O 01 N O M � r- � N N � M M kn a1 It kn t- kn kn 00 `O kn 00 O `O N N N M 00 N N ---a N It M � 01 N \C ---a .--a l- M fn oo 01 O N O kn M r--I T oc \O M 00 a1 � a1 � N `O O M O O In 01 kn kn r- - r- N \c kn In M � N O `0 ---a r- O O IO O �T N O r- r O r- M C\ `0 00 M kn O N `O l-- kn kn a\ M 00 kn O O l� � M 00 l ^� rl kn M kn o0 N o0 M t� M O O M N �T a1 N M 01 � O O M O M T O I�t M N M O kn C1 C1 �t kn l-- N t `O M t- kn N O N M O O N M kn N o0 - � 01 N � o0 � rm� O N �t o0 kn O kn M 00 \O r- kn M O kn \O M N N N a1 r O kr� `O N 00 C7 01 O 00 O 00 lzt� 00 kn l- 3 \c .-� 00 M 00 O o0 kn `O I%O �T O M o0 O I�t N M M � a1 M INC 00 oc r- M M \O r- O N `O M N M kn 'IT 00 0 kn N N N N 00 M N O O kn � M 00 00 In N \0 `0 00 M 00 M N CD l- M Ic 01 � kn t kn � M l-- kn kn 00 kn M O O Q\ N 00 o0 `D O M 'IT k \O T--� a1 �10 M O O N `O l-- l� M a\ M o0 kn N 00 l� � M 00 l ^� rl kn M kn o0 N o0 M t� M O O M N �T a1 N M 01 N M 00 O M O M T O I�t M N M O kn C1 C1 �t kn l-- N t `O M t- kn N O N M O O N .-- .-- N N r--a M r--a 00 M lzl -1 N .-� N k n kn N IF-0 M �n I�t O O 00 `O o0 t� 1--+ r-+ 01 \c `o kn `c `c `c `c INC � INC `C `o kn `C `c r- O � INC kn � N 00 kn kn C1 l- N � O � �z 00 O �lc - --0 � 't � t- M C1 t `C � 01 't I�t kn � 00 � O kn O N I O O In ^� `D O M 'IT k \O T--� a1 �10 M O O N `O l-- l� M a\ M 01 01 � 00 00 l� � M 00 l ^� rl N M 1 � N l- o0 01 O O M N N M 01 .-� O M r--a N rl � O o0 1 %0 00 �T M 0*� 00 N M M C1 C1 01 N N 01 O `O r- M � O � .--a N �10 kn M O N 00 r+ ri 00 o0 kn N N N N .-� J." l� M M C7) O kn O kn \O C1 l- N � O � N � t� `O to M Cl) M t O M 01 `O `O 00 kn N O O O O O O 0*� �.z I�t 01 00 l� 'IT � N O 00 �10 ---a � N N r--a In l� M O M In In ll O �10 l� � M 00 l In M kn o0 O N l- o0 01 O 01 01 N N N O M O M M C1 N N O kn kn N to N oo N O kn C1 N \O M 01 r- 00 - T.-O 'IT O O N - O O N M M C\ M M J." ~ U l-- N M N M N M 't kn O M I�t 1 1.0 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O .-� .-� •-� �--� N N N M M M M M It It It I�t kn kn kn In `O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O cn , .. c 0 J." ~ U p '= �, y A� a� �, it cr tb 3 an i w U O '� w U .� C5 a w •� a rn a a l-- N M N M N M 't kn O M I�t 1 1.0 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O .-� .-� •-� �--� N N N M M M M M It It It I�t kn kn kn In `O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O N 0c M cn U V C� N L to to V U) LL L V L � L E T v r N tQ W O ' L � 0 � W O 0 X a O 4a O � a � O co V o ca �, � L LL L m Q � L O O a E cn L tQ E O u �n O oc d 4 v O �L o � N V a M — E 0 m X _ W W 0 m N N d V L }1 L C E x C W W ca d m .0 O = E X _ W W 0 m ca m N L = C E d � � v x _ W W W m C LL L d i kn \O M 01 M Cl) O M o0 00 N O 01 kn � INC O O O O \O � O 00 I�t o0 IF-0 O M 01 O � O \O O � lfi I� M O O O C\ ^m� M M •--a .-� 'IT N O a1 O r- `O .-� 1 16 �i N kn k n O O C1 01 M C1 00 N t� C� I�t M N O CNN oc In M 00 \O �n In o0 M r- C\ C1 In l� M �z O N M N o0 01 M \O O O N N o0 O M O o0 1 %0 In o0 M `O `O M M M C1 C1 M l� �O C1 C1 C) `,� o � N M 00 00 C1 t� M W 4 W � 7= o0 \O N N � r--� \C OO kn 01 N N O O O O 01 C1 M C1 00 00 In O oo M l� �o a1 kn lzt lzt 00 Z t N r - �c ^� M C1 I�t O Cl) O M o0 00 N O 01 kn � INC O O O O \O � O M M T--I M N 00 kn 00 M o0 I- I- M O O M 't O O C\ ^m� I�t In In 00 00 l� 'IT N O a1 O r- `O .-� 1 16 �i N kn k n O O C1 01 M C1 00 In 00 M kn N O .-� In M N ---a r- ^� oc In M 00 \O �n In o0 M r- C\ C1 In l� M �z O N o0 N 00 a1 �' N M M C1 01) 00 \O a\ N O oc I�t N N O O O IF-0 N O O O N N O O 01 OO 1--+ N O `O \O In 'IT kn oc O o0 I- I- O M O O N O O O M 00 01 01 00 l� N N \O N o0 r- r- N N 00 O N N 01 N 00 M 00 00 M 00 M kn O 00 O o0 I�t M 00 kn - r-+ kn � r- M �z O N o0 N 00 a1 �' N ':; IF- 0 N \C N C) `,� o � N M 00 00 C1 N M In �t M - M o0 N I- 01 O O O O \p \O \O N kn r--� r- In O I� 01 r-� r-� \O O O In C1 11C 00 % 1%0 01) 0, INC N � 00 00 M O O T." `0 Cl) � O O O O r." N O M r." kn N O O I�t N O � O `C M 00 l-- 00 \O N I�t `O 00 r- `O r- N N 00 k M .-� a1 C1 M � � C1 O r� r+ I �t a1 In In N t- In 00 M l-- 00 M M O N O `O l� N 00 M M C1 \O t� M N 00 O 00 N 00 � M kn �T to O N O O M 00 l- rm- 01 o0 00 t� t- .--O IO N kn oc O �-c ---- �t 01 N 01 O N O O N M t- N t N l M r .--a l N 00 O N N 00 01 kn l- oc a1 M O N M kn N 01 o0 to 00 - r-+ � r- M �z O N o0 N 00 a1 �' ri ':; IF- 0 N \C N C) `,� o � N M oc 00 C1 O O~ � �' ri ':; C) `,� o � O ) W 4 W � 7= y r-- L l U ct A-a U W U W Q N U rA O O O O O O O O O O 00 00 O 00 O 00 O 00 O 00 O 00 O 00 O 01 O O 0 C\ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ACTION NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: March 27, 2012 Accounts Paid — February 2012 Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator ITEM NO. M -7 SUMMARY of INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors Payroll 02/03/12 Payroll 02/17/12 Manual Checks Grand Total Direct Deposit 1, 054, 364.89 1,158,183.09 Checks Total $ - $ 4 88,850.45 1,151,215.34 91,054-81 1,247, 217.90 $ 7 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. N -1 AT A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMI N IS CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2912 AGENDA ITEM!: Work session to discuss fiscal year 291 -2913 budget development: a. Discussion of departmental budget cuts and service delivery impacts as presented to the Board on March 13, 2912 b. Discussion of implementation of Senate Bill 497 -- passing along the five percent (5 %) employee contribution to Plan 1 employees SUBMIT'I•ED BY: W. Brent Robertson Director of Management and Budget APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III 17- County Administrator wo_� vul od COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside to discuss Roanoke County's budget development for fiscal year 2912 -2913. Page 1 of 1 N -1.a County of Roanoke FY12 -13 Budget Development Departmental Budget Reduction Summary Department Reduction Police $120,000 ■ Vehicle replacement funding will be reduced. This will result in four fewer vehicles purchased per year (at ^'$30,000 per vehicle). This still leaves the department with approximately $585,000 in vehicle replacement funding. Fire and Rescue $SD,D00 ■ The department will reduce general operating expenses by $50,000 with the goal of minimizing impact to operations, to the extent possible. ■ Per prior Board approval, the department will also adjust ALS fees to current Medicare rates. This fee increase will generate an additional $95,000 of revenue. In addition, for FY10 -11, $130,000 of ALS fees were collected in excess of budget projections. Therefore, an upward adjustment in ALS fees of $130,000 will be made to recognize the increase in revenue collected. Total increase in ALS revenues will be $225,000. General Services • 'rhe Freeloader service will be eliminated; $40,500 of savings will be realized through the elimination of the position associated with this service through attrition. An alternative to eliminating this service would be to charge a fee to cover associated costs, • Dumpster contracts for specific condominiums and townhomes will be eliminated for a savings of $33,000. This service is not currently offered to all condominium units within Roanoke County. • Free residential garbage disposal at the transfer station will also be eliminated. While the total cost of this program is $180,000, only a portion ($90,000) is estimated to be realized as savings due to the uncertainty of the amount of this disposal that will be picked up at the resident's home through normal refuse collection. • The department's maintenance and repairs budget was reduced by $41,000. If this deferred maintenance is not addressed in the near future, the impact will primarily felt by internal customers. Communications and Information Technology ■ Reduced software support budget by $89,750. This reduction allows the department to maintain existing contracts for FY12 -13 but eliminates any contingency funding for support services related to software. ■ Virtually all offsite training and travel has been eliminated ($21,705), impacting the ability of staff to stay current and plan ahead for technology services. ■ Contingency funding of $60,000 has been eliminated. The department will not be able to assist other departments with small projects and unanticipated repairs/replacements. ■ Funding for preventive maintenance and repairs to towers and microwave system has been reduced by $15,400. The department will have to access its capital maintenance account to make up for the reduction, reducing the amount available for the annual maintenance costs of the radio system. ■ The ECC equipment budget was reduced $15,000, resulting in less on -site inventory and potential delays in repairs while parts are being shipped. $225,D00 $208,855 N -1.a County of Roanoke FY12 -13 Budget Development Departmental Budget Reduction Summary Department Reduction Community Development $139,000 • Elimination of a Planner II position for savings of $55,225. The loss of this position will increase the time required to complete project work and day -to -day workload requirements • Elimination of Engineer position for a savings of $64,040. • Reduction in miscellaneous operating expenses Parks and Recreation $100,733 • A vacant Recreation Program Manager position was eliminated. This resulted in a reorganization of departmental duties at the Brambleton Center. This redistribution of duties will increase employee workloads. • "rhe department transferred a Recreation Programmer position from the County's General Fund to the department's self- funded Fee Class. There will be no impact to this move in terms of service levels as the position will simply be funded by fees generated in the Fee Class account. Social Services $215,000 • The state has taken over the funding for Child Care Assistance. The program still exists but the locality is no longer responsible for payments. Therefore, the workload related to this program remains but the overall result is a net savings. The reduction in revenue of approximately $2 million is offset by an equal reduction in expenditures and the local match is no longer required. Board of Supervisors $5 • Reduction taken from part -time dollars. Remaining part -time budget is sufficient for current workload; however, changes in the current business climate that result in an increased workload would stress the department's part -time budget. Clerk of the Circuit Court $7,500 • Storage and maintenance contracts for the upcoming fiscal year are anticipated to be lower due to reduction in storage costs. Commissioner of the Revenue $6,000 • Printed forms budget was reduced which could limit the flexibility and availability of various forms associated with business license renewal, business personal property tax filing, and tax relief filing. Commonwealth Attorney $2,000 • Reduction was taken in furniture and office equipment. This will have minimal impact on daily operations; however, deferred replacement could be detrimental in future budgets. County Administration (County Administrator, Assistants, and Public Information) $8,500 • Reductions were taken in various operational accounts, primarily in the areas of special events, training, and software. 61 2 N -1.a County of Roanoke FY12 -13 Budget Development Departmental Budget Reduction Summary Departme Reduction County Attorney $2,500 • The $2,500 reduction in professional services will further limit the department's ability to obtain outside counsel and hamper flexibility in responding to additional legal obligations, should they arise. Court Service Unit $5,000 • The reduction was taken out of the department's furniture budget. This will have little impact on the department's operations. Economic Development $5,500 • Reduction was taken in travel and training related to marketing activities and conference participation. This will impair the ability of the department to promote Roanoke County through networking and educational opportunities. Elections $7,500 • Reduction was taken from part-time funding. This may affect the timely processing of absentee ballots and voter registrations. Finance $35,000 • A vacant Office Support Specialist position was eliminated. This will impact the ability of the department to have someone at the front desk to greet patrons, answer the phones, and respond to departmental needs and questions promptly. The action will further shift and realign workloads, and change some processes related to surplus property. Human Resources $20,000 • Tuition reimbursement benefit will be completely eliminated. This will be an elimination of a benefit previously offered to Roanoke County employees. library $75,000 Funding for the purchase of new books and other materials was reduced. While short - term impact is minimal, in the long -term this will increase wait times for new items, decrease the amount of fines collected, and age the library's collection. The department's technology replacement budget was also reduced. This will have the potential impact of more machines out of service and increase wait times for PC use. The department also reduced a number of other miscellaneous operating expenses. Expense line items are already thin due to previous operating reductions and cost increases. Management and Budget $2,500 • Reduction was taken out of the department's technology replacement budget. This will result in minimal impact to departmental operations in the near -term. long -term equipment needs will have to be addressed during future budgets. 3 N -1.a County of Roanoke FY12 -13 Budget Development Departmental Budget Reduction Summary Department Reduction Public Transportation $75,000 ■ The CORTRAN program was reduced by $25,000. While there is no immediate impact due to this reduction, if transportation grants are reduced then the program would have to be reviewed for efficacy. Real Estate Valuation $5 • Citizens will no longer receive reassessment notifications if there is no change in value. This change will allow for a reduction in the department's postage budget. Risk Management $50 • The Occupational Nurse position contract was eliminated. In addition, the county's insurance contracts are being renegotiated for a potential savings. Sheriff $55 The department was able to reduce its water budget by $32,000 due to the utility savings resulting from replacement of all of the valves in the jail. A part-time clerical position will not be filled. This will have a minimal impact on departmental operations. All non - mandatory training and professional development programs were also eliminated. The impact of this reduction will be minimal due to the fact that mandatory training will still be offered. Treasurer $13 ■ The department reduced a number of miscellaneous operating cost line items. These items were related to collections of delinquent taxes, printed forms, etc. There is minimal impact to these reductions; however, future efforts for collection of delinquent taxes will need to be considered to optimize tax collections. VA Cooperative Extension $3 ■ The department reduced its telephone budget. There is minimal impact from this reduction. Grand Total Department Reductions FY12 -13 $1,407,088 4 N -1.b County of Roanoke, Virginia Impact of SIB 497 and Possible Salary Increases March , 2012 Work Sesso n Legislative Actions: House and Senate approved SB497 and HB 1130 on March 1, 2012 Requires that persons employed by local government and school board employers be required to pay the five percent employee contribution to the VRS. Local employers and schools boards would be required to provide Plan 1 employees with a raise to offset the employee contributions. Current Employee Croups: • Plan 1-- Employees hired before July 1, 2010 not paying the 5 employee share (815 employees). 0 Plan - Year I —Employees hired between July 1, 2010 and May 10, 2011 were hired with the understanding that there could be a change and were given a supplement semi-annually for years (2011-12 and 2012-13). Effective July 1, 2011 this group began paying the 5 % employee contribution. • Plan -Year - Employees hired after May 10, 2011 1 were hired with the knowledge that they would pay the 5 employee share. Impact of the Legislation: • Employees will have to pay Fi a and VRS premiums on the offsetting raise required by the legislation. 0 The County will also have to pay Fi a matching and VRS premiums on the offsetting raise required by the legislation. 0 All Plan 2 employees are already paying the 5 % VRS deduction so any raise provided to Plan employees will require new money. N-l.b �� u ai L 0 fu 0 C LL L O i o T L. y � CN CD x 5. Ez 0 u c 0 0- 0 L V7 I I xi xi 0 I 0 (D m Ln 0 Oc — 0 — ra Ln 4 0 0 0 0 0 CL In CL a- Q. Q. a- a. a 0 m ° L.0 Q. u — — Q. CL C. CL C .0 . CL CL Q) (L) qj cu u (1) 4-J u r- r u r (ii aj o ai u u u 4- 4 txo 0 � o CZ- _0 tn Q. cl: � Q) Ln > Ln 0 tn Ln - - � a D fu fu m tA Ln D L LA V) Ln u 46-- a 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 4-J 4.# F (ii w 1 4-- 4- Ln Ln Ln L&-- Lf) Ln 4-- Ln tn O o u fu cu u (L, o Q, � oLn o Ln u o u u o Ln m u ro '� � + — O r- 0 � `� `� C: o Ln cC C t oC UP) o (n o OC o o � Z; ±� 0 -0 C: 4-J V) o _0 � — tA -0 -0 -0 -0 r- -0 -0 -0 C: -0 -0 -0 C -0 -0 C CL u CL E � r Ln kD al 00 LO rl_ 00 H rn H -. a) C:) m r4 rn rn r-- r-I LO H 00 LU m aj cu ON ON O O f � O G O O 4-J U ONO, tn + L n L n Ln Ln 0 (1) D Ln ` 1 I f 1- 0 4- Ln L 7 Ln L I r4 M i�F C LM l} � # r"I { a m K /.� CL L41 LA 0 0 0 C CC } + GC OC CC m ON 4 > > ON O CL { Ln L Ln LO Ln Ln L t 4 CN CD x 5. Ez 0 u c 0 0- 0 L V7 0 A N 4k, 4 0 1838 14 ILI U rt f 11 0 f 1 0 1 It I0 tz Board of Supervisors P. O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VA 24018-0798 Richard C. Flora, Chairman Hollins Ma District Michael W. Altizer. Vice-Chairman Vinton Ma D,islrict Th.e Honorable Boh McDonnell Office of the Governor Patrick Henr Buildin 3rd Floor 1111 East Broad Street Richmond, VA 23219 Stib VRS Amendments Dear Governor McDonnell. March 1, 2012 N-1.b Joseph B. "Butch" Church Catawba Ma District Eddie "'Ed" El rick Windsor Hills Ma District Charlotle A. Moore. Cave Sprin Ma District On March 10, 2012, the General Assembl adopted HE3 1130 and SB497, which aniended nr.umerous provisions of the Vir Retirement S (V RS]. In our review of this le we have and several instances of internal. ineon SiSLencies or conflicts with odder provisions of the State Code or the proposed bud and for Roanoke Coun L sia lifficant adverse financial impacts. We hope that y ou will propose amendments to correct these problems and remove these financial impacts on us. We do not understand the basis for the re found in SB 497 which mandates local g overnments to re their emplo to pa the 5% member contribution to VRS previousl paid b the Count alon with a mandated 5% salar increase to offset this mandate. We find no benefit to either the Count or the Commonwealth from this mandate; instead it imposes additional costs on both the Count and its emplo In order to hold our emplo harmless from the pa of additional taxes., we have calculated the additional FICA pa to the federal g overnment as the result of this mandate to be 1.5% of pa or approximatel $7S3,000 f0r die Count and $1,400,000 for the Roanoke Coun� School Board. This mone could Y h a ve b een tj se,d to g ive our em p lo 1. 5 % salar in crease, b it t n ot 1 t will g o to th e Federal in the pa o FICA tax This is trul a lose-lose situ atio n Last y ear Roan ke Coun t m od i fied its pa and classi ficatio n s to re Ilan 2 emplo pa the 50/o VRS amount, while the Count continued to pa this emplo share for Plan 1 emplo We provided a salar ad to alleviate the financial impacts on Plan 2emplo who were alread an the pa and no salar ad to Plan 2 emplo hired after the effective date of our local action. Because of our prior OFFICE FAX: VOICE MAIL: E-MA U (5401 772-2005 ( 540) 772-2193 (540 777.6399 bos a roanokecou n "a. gov N -1.b I'Zi Two March 16, 01 {ic: ions, Roanoke County is already rea lizin g the savings from neiv h ires pl kiTig up th employee share of VRS. This mandate adversely affects Roanoke County since we have already begun to shift this cost to our Plan 2 employees, subject to certain conditions and adjustments. This mandate from March 1 upsets this careful balance with no benefit to either the County or th Commonwealth. The only beneficiary is the federal government through increased FI CA taxes and fees. Therefore, we urge y ou to submit an amendment that would allo%v loca lities the option of shifting the SoUrce of employee conLributions from the e mployer to the member employee. We urge you to submit are amendment that would remove the r andatory salary increase, to Q ffs t the shifting of inember contributions, The re is no inip c t on the VRS trus t t'r`111(f, It merely changes the source of the funds and not the amount of the funds. We are concerned about what -seem to be major inconsistencies be - L oen HB13 1 and H B 1130. H 1301 includes Item 468 45 which provides that contribution rates paid to VRS shall be based upon are assumed B' Yo rate of return over a 30 year amortization period. This provision seems to be in conflict with th e contribution rates included in H 113 adopt ed on March 10. The resolution of this con [lict impacts Roanoke County by are ustimated $2 mi llion, Likewise the teacher retirement rate o f 11,66 is in conflict wfth the 11OUse b hill rate of 10,23%. This financial impact is approximately $1 million for Roanoke County, In conclusion we request that your submit an amendment that would allow, but d not require, local go vernment and school hoard employer's to elect to pay the Solo employee contribution to VRS foreither - Plan 1 or Plan 2 employees, or both, Linder c nditic ns established by the lo calit ies . In addition, we reqUest that you rnodi�T 11B130i so that is still includes a reduction of VRS rates for local governments,. and continues to all the Schools a supplement from the State for their local contribution to the VRS. Near truly yours, Richard C. Flora C hairman C- S enator Jo . Edivarcls Senator Ralph K. Smith S enator Stephen D. Newman Delegate Gregory D. Hab c h Delegate Onzlee W Delegate Christopher T. Head A Vir Assoclation of Counties March 21. 20 1 2 of U­P L :NN" . %710 The Honorable Bob McDonnell 01fice of the Governor Patrick Henry Buildin C o., 3rd Floor I I I I East Broad Street Richniond, Vir 23219 Via fax ( 804 ) 371-6351 Dear Governor McDoniiell: V I Pt G t N I A M U N 1[;,I P A L L I L A G U E �Hiw , Senate Bill 497, passed b the House and the Senate at the end of the re session on March 10, re that local emplo be jul 1, 2012. pa the five percent emplo contribution to the Vir Retirement S The bill also re that local emplo increase their emplo creditable compensation b five pet-cent. School boards are allowed to pliase-in these re and we understand that y ou have a to submit all amendment to allow other local g overrinnents to phase-In the re as well. Certainly the emplo of local g overnments should be treated the same as school boards staff and we commend y ou for that amendment. We re that y ou consider these additional ameiidnients. First, we ask that Y OU place a reenactment clause on the bill. It was not at all clear g oin g into the fi nal da of the sess lon that an action Would be taken on this b and the 579 po I it ica I subdivisions affected b Senate Bill 497 did not have the opportunit to educate their legislators oil the effects of this le Since the end of the session, local g overn nie tits and school divisions have spent considerable of determinin the effect of the bill on their- workforces and oil their bud The mandated increase in creditable compensation will cost local g overnments and school boards millions ofd llars in fixed costs for increased retirement contribLi t ions and federal taxes without providin a sin dollar towards reducin the unfunded liabilit of an of the retirement trust funds mana b the Vir Retirement systetn. W Further, there are a number of lo issues that have surfaced. For example, the re increase ill creditable compensation ail I P LIS11 man lon()-Lirne emplo over the tops of their pa scales. There are also q uestions bein raised about the public purpose bein(7 served b havin the state dictate salary, decisions for local emplo Indeed without a true public put-pose the bill does nothin more than impose costl burdens on local g overnments and more importantl on real estate taxpa The bill itself offers no state fundin for the mandated clian )es. conlilnle�v N-1.b Should a reenactment clause not be included as an amendment, we ask that y ou submit an amendment to make optional the re that emplo of political subdivisions pa the five percent nicniber contribution in return for the five percent salar increase. Without an overridin state P Urpose. the g overnin g bodies of the political subdivisions should be making this decision. not the state. M Finall we ask that y ou remove the re for an increase in creditable compensation to offset the chan in emplo contributions. A this is a decision that should be made b the local. g overnincy bodies, 110L by the slate. The increased costs that will be incurred under SB 497 could not come at a worse time t1 or political subdivisions. Local g overnments and school boards are alread in the midst of a ver difficult bud dcvelopment process. Cit count and town revenues are either flat or still declinin and local g o erne and school boards face increased costs for retirement insurance, utilities and oasoline. Local (lovernments simpl do not have the revenue resources to pa the additional costs thatxvill be incurred b the implementation of SB 497. We hope that y ou will g ive ever consideration to these chan and we appreciate y our effort to hold t�p down the number of mandates placed on local g overnments and school boards. Senate Bill 497 is definitel an unfunded mandate in its current form. Sincerel James D. Campbell. Executive Director Mi- Association ation of Counties I , I OVA Alfred R. Butler, IV, Executive Director Viroinia Association of School SUperintendents Z-- N" "0> R. Michacl F � Execludi fe Director Viruyinia MUllicipal Leat.-Rie I V A Barbara Co ExeCUtive Director Vira Boil 'Vir School Bocls Association 2012 SESSION N -1.b ENGROSSED 1 3 4 6 7 10 11 12 1 14 15 1 1 1 19 2 21 22 23 2 25 26 2 2 3 31 32 33 4 5 36 37 38 40 41 2 44 6 47 48 4 50 51 52 54 56 58 1214D SENATE BULL NO. 497 AMENDMENT DIM ENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE (Proposed by the Senate Committee on Finance) (Patron friar to Substitute - Senator Watkins Senate Amendments in [ ] - February 14, 2012 BILL to amend and reenact § 51. 1-144 of the Co of V irginia, relating Virginia Retiro r stem employee contributions; local employees; school board employees. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia: 1. That § 51.1 -144 of the Code of Virginia is amended and reenacted as follows: 51.1 -144. Member contributions. A. Each member shall contribute fie percent of his creditable compensation for each pay period for which he receives compensation. The employer skull deduct the contribution payable by the member. Every employee accepting employment shall be deemed to consent and agree to any deductions from his compensation required by this chapter. No deduction shall b e taken from the compensation of a member after his normal retirement date if the member elects not to contribute. B . In determining the creditable compensation of a member in a payroll period, the Board may consider the rate of compensation payable to the member on the date of entry or removal of his name from the payroll as having been received throughout the month if service for the month is creditable. If service for the month is not creditable, the Board may consider any compensation parable during the month as not being creditable compensation. C. The minim compensation p by law for any mem ber sha b e reduced by th e deduction required by this section. Except for any benefits provided by this chapter, payment of compensation minus the deductions shall be a full and complete discharge of all claims for services rendered by the member during the period covered by the payment. D. No deduction shall be made from any member's compensation if the employer's contribution is in default. E. The Board may modify the method of collecting the contributions of members so that the employer may retain the amounts deducted from members' salaries and have a corresponding amount deducted from state funds otherwise parable to the employer. F. 1. Except as provided in Ai S i offl. subdivisions 2 3, and , any employer may elect to pay an equivalent amount in lieu of all member contributions required of its employees. Such payments shall be credited to the members' contribution account. These contributions shall not be considered wages for purposes of Chapter § 5 1.1-700 et seq.) of nor shall they be considered to be salary for purposes of this chapter. 2 . A person who becomes a member on or after July 1, 2010, shall be rewired to pay member contributions on a salary reduction basis in accordance with § 41h of the Internal Revenue Cade in the amount of five percent of creditable compensation if the person is i a member covered by the defined benefit plan established under this chapter, (ii) a member of the State Police Officers' Retirement System under Chapter 2 1.1 - 200 et seq., (iii) a member of the Virginia Law Officers' Retirement System under Chapter 2.1 § 51.1 -211 et seq.), iv a member of the Judicial Retirement System under Chapter § 1.1 -300 et seq.), or v earning the benefits permitted by § 51.1-138. �l�dro � � a amou in Of Of 49 �; �; f� poi �d of ter 10ML-1PIAE)Yff Ma In ye perce up to fiv Of the Of F ol t4o emple 1 parys the same per-Go Of (H)Fn &4 of a �n r Judy -; the Onlint � r �� amnloll be by No amnlp as Of shall IL mamLer en or 3y 4- 2010. 3. A person who became a m ember before July 1, 2010, who is can employee o a coun city, to n, or other local employer} other than a local public school board shall be required to pay member contributions on a salary reduction basis in accord with § 4 14(h) of the Internal Revenue Code i the amount of five er of creditable compensation. No county, city, town, or other local employer shall be allowed t o elect to pay a amount of memb contri required pursuant to this D1 z 0 [a En tj o C7d N -1.b SS 1 oft 60 subdivision. 61 4 . A member who is an e mployee of a local public school board, regardless of whether the member 62 is a person who became a member on or aft July 1, 2 010, shall be required t pay member 63 contributions o a salary reduction basis in accor with § 414(h) of the Internal e r e Code in 64 the amount of f ive percent of creditable compensation as follows: i any member who commences or 65 recommences employment on or aft er .July 1, 2012, shall be required to contribute fi ve pet of his 66 creditable compensation upon commencing or recommencing employment and it members in service on 7 June 3 2012, shall be required to contribute five percent of their creditable compensation no later 68 t July 1, 2 016 Su member described in subdivision ii shall contribute a minimum of an 69 additional one percent of his creditable compensation beginning o each Ju I of 2012, 2 013, 2014, 70 2015, and 2016 or until the member' contribution ion equals five percent of r rb compensation, but 71 the local public school board employer may elect to require members to contribute to mor than an additional one percent each year, in whole percentages. In no case shall a member be required to 73 contribute more t five ,percent of his creditable compensation s ation f or each pry p eriod for which h 74 receives compensation. No local public school board employer shall be allowed to elect to pay any 75 a mount of ` r er b r contributions except to pay the d between five percent a the employee 76 contribution daring the phase --in period described in this subsection ection for a member who was in service 77 on J une 0, 2012. 7 5. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section or other law, only those employers wh 79 were paying member contributions as of February 1, 2010, roar par member contributions. The 0 provisions of this subdivision shall not apply to a county, city, town, local public school board, or other 1 local employer. 82 C to a rzadnn his fn o r th 83 6 t �d f` by �� o94 to ffl f 7 t4e conuneneem of 1 �` �- to nMA rnt-walpemi r, fef 89 its empla in aeeopdane A _51 1 L 90 LJLLV�' %.0 X�FA_l lhr JL A #W �� �s in naaar-dane 91 o f the InWma4 Roveau in y Of` � t n �- ' its T of {9titiK[1 Ltlw if\71 F L. ".' 9 -1-. The Board may develop procedures to effect the transfer of member contributions paid by 94 employers on or after July 1, 1980, and accrued interest on those contributions, to the member 95 contribution account of the member, if such contributions have been previously deposited into the 96 retirement allowance account of the employer. 97 2. That any county, city, town, local public school board, or other local employer that currently 98 pays member contributions to the Virginia retirement System that the member win be responsible 9 for paying pursuant to the provisions of this act shall provide an increase in total creditable 100 compensation, effective July 1, 2012, to each affected member to offset the cost of the member 101 contributions, Such increase in total creditable compensation shall be equal to the difference 142 between n five percent of an employee's total creditable compensation and the percentage of the [ 1 member I contribution paid bar the local � member I n anuar �, 12. If a 104 local public school hoard elects to phase in the I effi.P member I contributions pursuant to 105 subdivision F 4 of § 51.1 -144 of the Bode of Virginia, the increase in total creditable compensation 106 may also be phased in at the same rate, ACTION NO. ITEM NO. N -2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: March 27, 2012 Work session to review Roanoke County debt Rebecca Owens, Director of Finance Laurie Gearheart, Assistant Director of Finance B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Board of supervisors formalized the County of Roanoke's debt management program by adopting a debt policy in December 2004. This policy established parameters for issuing debt and managing outstanding debt. It also provided guidance to the administration regarding the timing and purposes for which debt may be issued, types and amount of permissible debt and the method of sale that may be used. Adherence to a debt policy helps to ensure that a government maintain a sound position and that credit quality is protected. The County does not have any Constitutional or statutory debt limits. - f he County does abide by the following self- imposed debt targets: • Net debt as a percentage of assessed value will not exceed three percent (3 %.) This is calculated by taking the total outstanding debt and dividing by total assessed value of property. At June 30, 2011, 'the County's ratio was two point two two percent (2.22 %.) • Net debt per capita will not exceed a ratio of $2,500. This is calculated by taking the total outstanding debt and dividing by total population. At June 30, 2011, the net debt per capita was $2,181. • General obligation debt service as a percentage of general governmental expenditures will not exceed ten percent (10 %.) This is calculated by taking total debt divided by total expenditures of governmental funds, school expenditures and transfers to capital projects and proprietary funds. At June 30, 2011, the County's ratio was eight paint five one percent (8.51 %.) Page 1 of 2 The County is currently rated Aa l , AA +, and AA+ by Moody's Investor Service, Standard & Poor's and Fitch Ratings respectively. The ratings are high quality and are a reflection of the County's prudent financial policies, healthy reserve levels, financial conditions, economic development initiatives and management practices. The County has done everything that is can do to improve its bond rating. It is our commercial to residential ratio that keeps us from achieving the best quality rating of AAA. This work session will provide detailed information about the debt policy, debt limits, bond ratings, reserve balances, current debt and projected debt information for future planning. Staff will review the attached presentation daring the work session. Page 2of2 � v� v� i �•r � 1 C� N � C:) N l/) ry) v1 s � u L c� 0 � • �I N � O � V) +J Ln p U Ln 4-0 Ln LA 0 c� ft Ln 4=&O v 4maO 4=J � Q O 4=J cn c� C� 4maJ > ft 0 cn mc: 0 0 In Ln 0 Ln vi � Lu N � O � 0 O O � Ln a 4 m J Ln in N 0 4J � C� cn C: I > 0 v '� a� v 0 (V 4-J M r) M 4=J M 0 4=J Q) tA (1) C: > 4=J E 0 4mJ Ln N m 4=J '� cn 0 C:) 0 4moO 4=J u X C:) M C:) 0 4=J C: Cn A ll o � o � U L.*n U 4=J 0 0 M t � r� 1 r' a rig 0 O p W p N O N � M N e9- oO Co O qr� O "*� 0 o 01 � o N Co M O O M • N I� • C� O O O o \ LO CD o N r O O LO • N M • M CN I� C� o cu cu - cu O M O to o CU U O O E O O U }, O 4) O O x O O t/) > p O >1 cm CU -f-j - O U x O 0 O � O U — • O O 4 -1 O � O — O � Q � U O O •— O cn cn > O O O CU � cn cn a) O C r) O O U O CL x Z cu Z C� 0 L a LIM CL mo rt x RS O �s I � 1 � g 0 O O M O N O O N m O O N O O N LO O O O O O O ern O ern O ern O N N r— O O O O Ln F N a r f O O O M O N O O N �l O O N KX O O O O O O O O O O O Lr1 O ern O ern w w w w N N r i X LU r I i I 9 f _ r �r O Q� tA O ■ os 0 O O ai O N O O N Ol O O N goo N O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ■ ■ ■ 00 Il� 6 Un 4 m N O M M I + I' A { I r 6 II h s u LL oo�� ca Lf ) '44�� V) • GO a 140� a� bL 4=J a �c GO bL 0 sc I M MM MM Lin MM MM MM Ldn rM�lNI � m ct ct r' N c� ct ct ct ct Kk V J C) V O O V . H O O V .S ' O U O N a.� O m r R r n e i R i O i C) V O O V . H O O V .S ' O U O N a.� O m V O O �..� O •,� �, O ct rn C) V O O V . H O O V .S ' O U O N a.� O m V O O �..� O •,� �, O ct C) V O O V . H O O V .S ' O U O N a.� O m p k 1 m a LL 0 N O O 00 O � O LO N M O co 0 O O M co O N O � CD 609- 0 N N O � O M M 00 LO O N I� OP% LO I� MI co 00 ® � 00 co O .. co f09- \ N { C N N � ti r CD m 00 \ N O w O � M LO 0 M op O O M N {f} C N � CD M CD N co w � I� LO LO N M O 0 O op M cu Cu C� U. O O — CU Cu U Cu U c: CU a) O O CU c� C: a) — m m 0 �i � r I 1 LJ a, V C m N Q O i Q Q t� C 7 O U au 0 0 0� K 1 10 V) 0 0 0 o V ) o O ca O M a� > O � � � W oc U_ � Q f0 T 06 (0 O Ln m � Ln rl Ln O Ln M m lD i O K 1 10 V) 0 0 0 o V ) o O ca O M a� > O � � � W oc U_ � K 0 " LO 1 10 V) 0 0 0 o V ) o O ca O M a� > O U � � � ca Q f0 T 06 (0 O Ln m � O rl o O Ln M m lD i O W cn Ln N r l L O 4 l T Ln ca rl N U I� N I..L r4si a> Q O 0 " LO 1 10 M 0 0 0 o a o O � O M � U O O � � � ca Q Q o0 06 ai ai Ln r-I � O rl Ln O Ln M m lD i O M O Ln N r l M Ln ca rl N U I� N I..L Ln o Ln O lO O O Ln I� r--� ri o0 00 lD m r--1 1 10 M 0 0 0 o a o O lO N M O Ln O Ln O � Q Q Q o0 06 ai ai Ln r-I � O rl Ln O Ln M m lD 00 O M N Ln N r l M Ln Ln rl N O I� N O Ln o Ln O lO O O Ln I� r--� ri o0 00 lD m o M M ::I Ln l0 � 00 00 00 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o a � O r--i 00 O O M � m <D O N O Ln I� N lO lO lO I� 00 00 al al al O O O O Ln 00 rl I� M r--i r--i r--i r--1 1 10 M m O 00 m O Ln M lO N M 00 M r-- M Ln o0 LQ o0 I� RZI � lD o0 Ln r-I al O rl Ln O Ln M m lD 00 O M N Ln N r l M Ln Ln rl N O I� N O M O N I� lO I� O Ln I� t.D lD rl lD m N M M ::I Ln l0 � 00 00 00 m rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl lD M Ln N q:3 � M N N N Ln <D 00 q:3 N lD O N N N lO rl N I� R::t 00 rl M M O Ln 00 rl I� M M N N I� rl 00 rl 00 N q:3 Ln � � O M I� m I� I� f D O rl Ln M O N tD I� M O O rl rl rl rl rl rl rl N N N M R::3 Ln lD � 00 m C O O O O O O O O r O O O O O O O O C N N N N N N N N (s r r r r � r � a � Q a 4md . LU QO N M 0 Ln w O W i ■ U Y t/1 � Ln r d) � I Q0 C Ln d1 w a) > o cp J i-- 0 � O % l� m N 0 Wk 0 � 0 O X 4-J m m I Ln ct 0 Ln c� V-1'7-j E 4� o •— E (v M V 0 liq C: 0 Q._ C) ._ E J N CD 4-J M r) U CL QO N M 0 Ln w O W i ■ U Y t/1 � Ln r � I Q0 C Ln d1 w 0 � O % l� m N 0 Wk 0 � 0 O X 4-J m m I Ln L 4 n 0 Ln c� O O 4� M � oft QO •— E (v M V 0 liq C: 0 Q._ C) ._ N CD 4-J M r) U QO N M 0 Ln w O W i ■ U Y t/1 � Ln r ■ un O C 00 d1 w co % l� CO M 0 Wk 0 O ( "o M V CO qq- m I Ln QO N M 0 Ln w O W i ■ U Y t/1 � Ln r ■ O ■ - O C E l� Q0 ■ Q0 M ■ � M O m I Ln O Ln c� O O 4� s J J Q._ ._ ��- 4-J M > U N E C , 0 0 0 u 7 LLJ 0 tpOly L� L rllj rllj rllj �7- �7- N r r L r r M R Ln w M w l� A^ M � /mo L 1 �1 �1 00 w M LL LM M l� �1 w M L11 ®� M w U U) O ® ® w O O O O O O C T w O L r) r - V / kolev O 00 M M lD N w N N N N M 01 I U) N O N LL N O N LL M N O N LL N N O N LL N O N LL O N O N LL �1 O N LL 00 O N LL a r 4-J > 0 4=J CO 0 0 > 0 4=J L) o CL m 4=j u CL 4-J L LA LA (V tA LA LA MCI 0 C) 0 Eh ry") I GNP wi Lo wi 0 (v CD rd tn CL ro V) co �U Qj ra Ln Ln Ln i � a �� �! �" \�� ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER 0-1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA rr E M : SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: March 27, 2012 Public Hearings for Citizen Comment on the following items: (a) Real Estate, Personal Property and Machinery and Tools Tax Rates (b) General Comment on the Upcoming Annual Budget for fiscal year 2012 -2013 W. Brent Robertson Director of Management and Budget 1 i B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COM MENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As requested by the Board of Supervisors, staff advertised the proposed Real Estate, Personal Property, and Machinery and Tools Tax Rates for calendar year 2012 as fellows: a. Real Estate Tax at a rate of not more than $1.09 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. b. Personal Property Tax at a rate of not more than $3.50 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. c. Machinery and Tools Tax at a rate of not more than $3.00 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. Consistent with past practices, the Board has expressed a desire to hold a public hearing to elicit "general" comment on the upcoming annual budget development process. This hearing gives citizens the opportunity to express their priorities and concerns far the Board to consider during formulation of the upcoming budget. Page 1 of 2 The public hearings scheduled for today are for receiving written and oral comment on these two topics. The public hearing on proposed Tax Rates was advertised on March 13 and March 20, 2012, and the General Comment for the fiscal year 2012 -2013 Budget was advertised on March 20, 2012, thereby satisfying state code requirements for public notice. Page 2of2 ACTION No. SUMMARY of INFORMATION: At the direction of the Board of Supervisors, the proposed tax rates for the twelve (12) month period beginning January 1, 2012 and ending December 31, 2012, were advertised on March 13 and March 20, 2012, as follows: a. Real Estate Tax at a rate of not more than $1.09 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation b. Personal Property Tax at a rate of not more than $3.50 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation c. Machinery and Tools Tax at a rate of not more than $3.00 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation Page 1 of 2 I TEM NUMBER 0-2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2012 AGENDA ITEM: Request to adopt the following tax rates for calendar year 2012: (a) Real estate tax rate of $1.09 per $100 assessed valuation (b) Personal property tax rate of $3.50 per $100 assessed valuation (c) Machinery and tools tax rate of $3.00 per $100 assessed valuation SUBMITTED BY: W. Brent Robertson Director of Management and Budget ., APPROVED BY: Ik ti B. Clayton Goodman III 1 � County Administrator J P. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY of INFORMATION: At the direction of the Board of Supervisors, the proposed tax rates for the twelve (12) month period beginning January 1, 2012 and ending December 31, 2012, were advertised on March 13 and March 20, 2012, as follows: a. Real Estate Tax at a rate of not more than $1.09 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation b. Personal Property Tax at a rate of not more than $3.50 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation c. Machinery and Tools Tax at a rate of not more than $3.00 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation Page 1 of 2 A public hearing for citizen comment on the above advertised tax rates was held on March 27 20 1 2 . STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The proposed budget for fiscal year 2012 -2013 is predicated on the advertised Real Estate, Personal Property, and Machinery and Tools tax rates; therefore, staff recommends that the aforementioned tax rates be established as advertised. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2012 ORDER SETTING THE TAX RATE ON REAL ESTATE SITUATE IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 2011 BE IT ORDERED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the levy for the twelve -month period beginning January 1, 2012, and ending December 31, 2012, be, and hereby is, set for a tax rate of $1.09 per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation on all taxable real estate and mobile homes classified by Sections 58.1 -3200, 58.1 -3201 58.1- 3506.A.8, and 58.1 - 3506.13 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, situate in Roanoke County. Page 1of1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2012 ORDER SETTING THE TAX LEVY ON PERSONAL PROPERTY SITUATE IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 2012 BE IT ORDERED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the levy for the twelve -month period beginning January 1, 2012, and ending December 31, 2013, be, and hereby is, set for a tax rate of $3.50 per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation on all taxable, tangible personal property, excluding that class of personal property generally designated as machinery and tools as set forth in Section 58.1 -3507 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and excluding all those classes of household goods and personal effects as are defined in Sections 58.1 -3504 and 58.1 -3505 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, but including the property separately classified by Sections 58.1 -3500, 58.1 -3501, 58.1 -3502, 58.1 -3506 in the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, of public service corporations based upon the assessed value thereof fixed by the State Corporation Commission and duly certified. 2. That there be, and hereby is, established as a separate class of personal property in Roanoke County those items of personal property set forth in Section 58.1 -3506 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and adopted by Ordinance No. 121592 -11, and generally designated as Motor Vehicles for Disabled Veterans. 3. That the levy for the twelve -month period beginning January 1, 2012, and ending December 31, 2012, be, and hereby is, set at fifty (50 %) percent of the tax rate established in paragraph 1 for the taxable, tangible personal property as herein established as a separate classification for tax purposes and as more fully defined by Section 58.1- Page 1 of 2 3506 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and generally designated as Motor Vehicles for Disabled Veterans. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2012 ORDER SETTING THE TAX LEVY ON A CLASSIFICATION OF PERSONAL PROPERTY - MACHINERY AND TOOLS - SITUATE IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 2012 BE IT ORDERED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That there be, and hereby is, established as a separate class of personal property in Roanoke County those items of personal property set forth in Section 58.1 -3507 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and generally designated as machinery and tools. 2. That the levy for the twelve -month period beginning January 1, 2012, and ending December 31, 2012, be, and hereby is, set fora tax rate of $3.00 per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation on all taxable, tangible personal property as herein established as a separate classification for tax purposes and as more fully defined by Section 58.1 -3507 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and generally designated as machinery and tools. Page 1of1 P -1 PETITIONER: Western Virginia Water Authority CASE NUMBER: 2- 3/2012 Board of Supervisors Consent 1 St Reading Date: February 28, 2012 Planning Commission Hearing Date: March 6, 2012 Board of Supervisors Hearing & 2 nd Reading Date: March 27, 2012 A. REQUEST To obtain a Special Use Permit for a major utility service in an R -1, Low Density Residential, District. The major utility service involves the construction of a standpipe water tank approximately 102 feet in height on 0.51 acre, located at 4968 Northridge Lane (Tax Map Number 037.06 -01- 76.00- 0000), Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Three citizens spoke regarding the petition. Mr. Jim Stroup, 7922 Sequoia Drive, expressed discontent regarding the special use permit process citing that "the facts seem to be changing" and that the balloon test scheduled for the afternoon of the public hearing was unsuccessful in demonstrating the height of the proposed tower. Mr. Keith Moore, 7921 Sequoia Drive and president of the Whitney Estates Home Owners' Association, also expressed discontent regarding the petition. Mr. Moore inquired about how the cost of purchasing a property near Green Ridge Recreation Center for a water tank would compare to building the water tank on the proposed site. He also stated that he would like assurance that the water pressure would be boosted at the top of Sequoia Drive, the existing tank to be painted to match the proposed tank and a guarantee from the School Board that the current wooded buffer would remain in place in the future. Mr. Moore also noted that the balloon test was a "failure." Ms. Wilma McMahon, 7917 Sequoia Drive, yielded her time to Mr. Keith Moore. Mr. Moore stated that the reason community meeting attendance was low was misinformation. Mr. Moore stated that Google maps did not display the address in the correct location and that using "Catawba Magisterial District" was misleading because it implies an area near Route 311. Mr. Thomas Kincaide, 7925 Sequoia Drive, had questions regarding alternative sites and the future of the existing wooded area surrounding the proposed tank site. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Amanda Micklow presented the staff report. Ms. Hooker began the Planning Commission discussion. She noted that there appears to be a safety issue with inadequate fire flows in the area and asked the petitioner if any other properties were considered in the process and if so, why were they deemed unsuitable. The petitioner's representative responded that they Western Virginia Water Authority (WVWA) considered a site near Green Ridge Recreation Center but due to high land costs, FAA concerns and the need for additional pipes to be installed, the site was rejected. Mr. Marrano asked how much of the need was generated by the addition of Green Ridge and Gander Mountain and noted that the residents on the other side of 581 do not have to bear the brunt of these developments. Mr. Gary Robertson, Executive Director of Water Operations, responded that if the proposed tank were to be located north of Interstate 81 or on the Northside Schools property, the necessary flow would not be able to be recreated. Mr. Jarrell spoke on the buffer requirement issue and noted that no buffer can mitigate the height of the tank, which appears to be the larger issue. Mr. Peters stated that development has occurred over the past 25 years with inadequate infrastructure and that this issue should have been addressed earlier. Mr. Marrano stated that he understands the concerns of the citizens on Sequoia Drive over the loss of their viewshed and that he would like to have seen that all site alternatives exhausted. Ms. Hooker then noted that this petition is a land use issue and the question is whether this is appropriate location for a water tank. She also cited the Fire Marshal's expressed need for additional fire flows in the area. Mr. Peters stated that they need to look at all of the property in that area available for development and that if development continues to occur, the problem will only be exacerbated. Ms. Hooker than said she was glad to hear that the WVWA considered another site but she curious about the relationship between the WVWA and the schools, citing concerns over the buffer. Mr. Radford stated that having worked on the construction of Green Ridge Recreation Center, fire flows were inadequate before its development and also noted the proximity of that site to the airport. Ms. Hooker concluded the Planning Commission's discussion by recommending approval of the petition with four conditions. She commented that this is a difficult issue and that she recognizes the burden to adjacent neighborhoods. Mr. Peters commented during the vote that this is an issue of health, safety and welfare of the community. D. CONDITIONS 1. The site shall be developed in substantial conformity with the concept plan entitled "Western Virginia Water Authority Loch Haven Tank Site" dated December 23, 2011. 2. The proposed water tank shall not exceed a height of 102 feet. 3. Screening and buffering requirements for this site shall include the existing vegetation, modified to construct the proposed water tank, and the existing fencing. 4. There shall be no signage on the water tank except for the manufacturer's or installer's identification and appropriate warning signs and placards. Page 2of3 E. COMMISSION ACTION Ms. Hooker made a motion to recommend approval of the special use permit request with four conditions. The motion carried 4 -1. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE Mr. Marrano citied adverse impacts to residents closest to the proposed site for voting against the motion. G. ATTACHMENTS: X Concept Plan X Vicinity Map X Staff Report X Other Philip Thompson, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission Page 3of3 Information d'istr'ibuted during Planning Commission Meeting on March 6 • Applicant's Remarks with Attachments • Roanoke County Buffer Requirements IDNjEaMAR14C S to is made the /' a : = a Roanoke Count Plannin Commission Meetin March Board of Supervisors Meetin Roanoke Count Administrative Building Stand Pipe Wa S My name is Sam Darby and I represent the western Virginia water Authority tonight , on two special use applications. [The Planning Commission members are Gene Marrano, Cave Spring, Jason Peters (Vice-Chair), Vinton, Gary Jarrell, Hollins, David Radford (Chair), Windsor Hills and Martha Hoofer Catawba. Martha Hoofer's district includes the north side stand pipe; Gary Jarrell's district includes the broadcast tower.] I have with me tonight Gary Robertson, Executive Director, water operations and Bob Benninger, Director, water Operations. 4968 North Ridge Lane (Catawba) The first is an application for the installation of a 102' Stand Pipe water Tank on property located at 4968 Northridge Lane near Northside High School. This is permitted by special use permit in the R.- 1 zoning area. The water Authority owns a 1 I2 acre lot there on which a 30' water tank has been in use since the late 70's. (Attachment 1.) The surrounding area was developed and subdivided in the 80's and 90's, with the nearest residences (on Sequoia Drive) developed after 1998. (Attachment 2, with 5 elevations from different approaches.) The utility issue facing the water .Authority is inadequate fire flows toward the east and specifically involving the Green Ridge Athletic Center, the Valley Point Industrial Park and Gander Mountain. In addition there is some inadequate residential water pressure at the top of Sequoia Drive. The recommended fire flow is 1,000 gallons per minute with a minimum pressure of 20 pounds per square inch ("p.s.i.") based on peals hour domestic flows for a two hour fire suppression event. The current system will provide 1,000 gallons per minute but the system pressure will drop to 10 p.s.i. The proposed Stand Pipe water Tank will allow the 1,000 gallon per minute fire flow with a system pressure of 30 p. s.i. for the 2 hour fire suppression event. The optimum water pressure for a domestic use is 50--75 p.s.i.. The water pressure at the top of Sequoia Drive is between 25 and 30 p. s.i. and 12 or so residences at the top of Sequoia need to use pumps to create adequate water flow for domestic use. We have presented a graphics of a typical Stand Pipe water Tank (Attachment 3). A balloon was flown over the location in February and earlier today at the request of interested citizens. (I have some photos from the balloon tests if any of you are interested.) Some 280 notifications were sent out by Planning Commission staff to property owners who potentially would be affected. (Attactu 4.) we held a community meeting at the Northside Diddle School on February 23 d and heard the concerns of some 12-15 citizens at that time. Attachments: 1. water .Authority lot with proposed location of Stand Pipe water Tank 2. Concept flan with elevations (Stand Pipe water Tank Site) (5 pages) 3. Photo of Typical Stand Pipe water Tank 4. Mailing radius for Community Meeting 2. u v bq - ri •. -- Jo -- lodd I _ ,09 L - [I L '111 V os `- 1 :]Iva A11`dOHinv'*d VII 71. ie , y 5 j $ li "� EL c r , If •., f � w:R F11 I , t , © (" - O Lil C) O /� A CLIO OV7 cr- 1 CCD WO � as y� 0 Wp� Z 1� C) 0 Z x • = Of] O 1 - Q0 O ,F P . ; � o A Do o � LO > 0 -j # Y O O p O = LL ❑ It 0 { p ip dz oZ x �r Q O U \ c !{I V J 4 U) Ld a YJ �' L t i S ` •1 - - , ..y'P - �.Tr � • � � � X .... � � E LI , , 0 0? w u � C9 w r , z -� ati lil , - IJJ �- 3, SL V�4 Ile i �r , .Lvm� !! rw 0 ► LD e .04 pe- \� IWT� JO -- 3OVd NMOHS SV :111VOS :]Iva /dI JOHinv ji -LVM DiIS NDAVH HOO-1 Nil 41 --,i J!"IL, ,,7�' UOj 00 C) M CD C -� > CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD M CD M CD M CD CD 1,D n 'It M W --i © ON M N 1,0 10 It M RJ --i � CIN OD r- 1,D Lf) -It It �4- -It It m m m - — �t cr) m m co MMMNCU( Uojoj I + , �. ! - r, lE rEIE�rI, I�rE,! r, l� rl l,�E�E�� CD CD (U © C) CD M o © M C) M CD CD C> 0© C�- o ©© CD C) M C) CD M n C) M 0 ',1- M W -i p M W r-- %,D n I- M 0 q- m m m m m m m m m m w ru N m w w I I, I I X H IMI I T III I 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 11 t I I I IT' 1 1 41 X 1 11 1 1 11 1 11 1 X, I X -4 -" -4 -1 Cj L4 F - 0 LLJ C:) 0 > CD CD w z w CD C3 { i i 1 I � ! ! j ,�„ <E I ! � i cc) 0 w W I 0 3: p 0 0 cn 0 CL CD 0 U) x P W U) ct) - 0 :p CL C) L-Li LLJ z 0 LLJ > CD tD LU CD a P LU W (Y) U) 0 0 4-> 0 0 U) 0 d -P CD 0 C:1 I Lu (n I CD LL1 --4 I CD t I T 119 1 19 1 T I T 1 11 19 V IX I Ix I IX I IX I Ix I I W Lf) I- (Y) OJ --I © US CD r- W If) -t (Y) (y) (Y) m m m m 0i (u cu cu (u (u w --4 --1 --t -4 -q Elevation E-1 C) CL C) C) T C) C) 1� I i I i I 1� I I I I I i I I Y j I I 1� I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I I X7 1 T CD k,D n 'It M M --I CD M M r- tO n ' M W (D ON W r- 0 n --I _-A --4 Elevation 0 0 II II U 0 �'O A a © C) CD M o © M C) M CD CD C> 0© C�- o ©© CD C) M C) CD M n C) M 0 ',1- M W -i p M W r-- %,D n I- M < F: < Ckf Of q- m m m m m m m m m m w ru N m w w I I, I I X H IMI I T III I 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 11 t I I I IT' 1 1 41 X 1 11 1 1 11 1 11 1 X, I X -4 -" -4 -1 w 0 0 W C) (n 1: > C) CD C) CD C) C) C) CD - 0 :p C) L-Li LLJ z 0 LLJ > LU CD a P LU W (Y) U) 0 0 0 U) 0 0 Lu (n I --4 I C) C) CD C) T F9 Is I T I is ,,t CI) (U --4 C:) M OD r- -q- 4 -q- d (Y) m m -I -1 --4 I T 119 1 19 1 T I T 1 11 19 V IX I Ix I IX I IX I Ix I I W Lf) I- (Y) OJ --I © US CD r- W If) -t (Y) (y) (Y) m m m m 0i (u cu cu (u (u w --4 --1 --t -4 -q Elevation Jo -- IOdd - - - NMOHS Sv :��voS L J.vm L —CZ —Z L : , 31v0 LI JOHinv di � � R¢ I is G� '� � 1, (` 3 I ii U s 1� 1 it f � i��y R.(f zi ..i t1 e i1 `t�; iyli n w .l u014-anaj 0 0 0 0 0 © © C7 o CD CD ca C> Ca C? C� o (D o Ca o C> o o CD CD o CD p o 0 0 0 0 � n � - M W . , o m OD r- �D rn V M CU '-! o m OD r- LD In d- M R r . , o m m t1D 0 v- m 'd' d - ,-, . - r1 1-1 .-e .-I CJ C? +r C) CD FF1 Ill ! I 1 � I • � I � I I i, I I M I l l I I I j l I l i l • ? I ,; I i j i j I! f f s I { I t { ! t l 1 t I i t I I i I I f j I t I I I I I E 1 ` l I I I i ON o OD 1 � C) k l E I � ��g ��y f 6�wA � 1 I ! 1 j1 W E ' CD i l j j { I f W f ! e kD , I ( I j ? 3 r t j tl3 I M + F » I pq , CL s I p �L - F> I a 1 I ! I I p �- E C EI 3 I j I E l I I 4 j 4 I j I l l i - I - t I I i CD (U n t_ 1._... I I i l k I i I 1 I i i + CD o i o .� r �,O !n -I CO OJ . o m OD r tiD In d m N - o ON W r - %D In rt M N --I C) ON M r- %ID In -+ --1 1 --1 .-4 .--4 .--c ,--1 .-1 Elevation O .. 00 d � J Z Q O CJ ac cr O JO -- 30Vd NMOHS SV MV os l[—�:Z—Z[ :]iV0 VM Ll JOHinvdi.L gilS NDAVH HOO-1 b- C) 0 CD CD CD CD M CD <D CD CD M M CD M CD © M C3 C) © CD CD CD CD M CD C) CD CD CD CD 0 0 b - M RJ - CD GN CID r' - 1,0 V) '4' M (U C:) m OD r- W 0 'It M (U --4 C> (y , OD r , 0 0 "q- d- d "Kr 14- '-t d- M M M M M M M M M M W (V W W (U W CU W Oj Oj ii CD Z Q + L;j 0 I �lil�1���� !t { E� ; jai C> C) CD C) 0 0 Ld U) m > i C:) G� C) co j I k I I 1 i uj z 0 LLJ l i C) CD LLJ CD w Lu CD CD 0 0 0- X 1 L3 CL CD -0 t p th d CD I i � i k k i I E � I�; 1 ' C) C) C3 + 11 Its I T 119 IT �D in t M (U 'r -, - 0 - - .1 - 'j --4 --1 1-4 --1 --1 IT 119 11 11 1 1 g I I I - r - I I x 11 jig 119 is g I s I S I s x x 7 l c� CD --A CD U, CO r- ED 9) It M N --I C:> ON 00 r- W Olt mw --ICDCYN co r- ko to "t M m In m m m m m M m w m w N w w w w W (U -4 -4 _- _- -- -4 -4 C) CD CD 0 T Elevation Jo 39vd iJMOHS Sv :3IVOS J.vm ".�� it —�Z —ZI �3iv(],` 14 a � � S. = 3I � �';. �� E k`'�S" I A t� i � i �. I� a 17 5 3 0 0 0© CD o ca C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 o©© o C� LD Lf) '*L M N ." o m OD f- tip Ln "- M OJ .-i o m 00 r- w (') (Y) M (Y) C7 (') Im (Y) M N (U (U (U o o CD © o 0 0 0 Ln d (n N .-, o m O0 CU N (U (U CU (l l t t if t t Yll, E r j I I s j i f( I I i ca. 0 0 ' d V i E I I I ( 3 ! l k 3 I I 1 I S 3 j O (V)O� a j I i I co � I j j ( 1 ( m O I g � iJ �d I LLJ IDD ' �� 1 ( Lu 1 i ! LU I 6J II� I E p I I I I Lu (n m ! I I 1 f I l j k I f Q 4-> �,D d I i k k i I i CD \ i i 1 Ln I { e ' o I I �. 7 p t O i ! 1 o ca I + L i 6 I ( � p w Ln It m N o m 00 r- 0 Ln "r - m w CD m w n w n d- m (U o m IM ct eh d d d In (m m M m m w (U (U w w N w (U N -1 .-t --I I r--1 - -4 Elevation � /�\ \\ \ ^� � ^� \ \ \ . \/ \ ,« � \ \ \., \. � � � �\ <� / � ? §� \ �/ / `� . � \: ,� ;�� \� \\�� /� } \� \ \, � � :: � � �m . l \ , °� �} � \ Attachment 3 4968 'North Ridge Lane (Catawba) l z 00 \ � {�pR '� ��- � '—,... © �. <'. ,PUMP / �. �— ..= ,� � `�; - I j W.3 lW9 Z[OZ ' q oje VI 'Aepsan_ :a mopp :A pajedai )luel VMAN\:;DweN kW bui-@@V\l A jo snipe� buip" 04 X U 2 .9 �b' - 6 Chapter Z: Landscapigg Landscaping March 22, 2011 2 -3 Section 2.2 - Landscaped Buffer Yards Figure 2.2 -1Type A Buffer "Row" should not be construed as meaning that the plants must be uniformly planted. TYPE A BUFFER OPTION 1: 20' Buffer For every 75' consisting of: One row of large deciduous trees (3) One row of large evergreen shrubs (12 -14) One row of large deciduous shrubs (16 -18) OPTION 2: 15' Buffer For every '75' consisting of: One row of small deciduous trees (5) One row of large evergreen shrubs (12 - 1 14) G' Screening 75 1 PLAN VIEW ELEVATION Roanoke County Design Handbook 2 -4 1 March 22, 2011 Figure 2.2 -2 Type B Buffer Chapter 2: Landscaping "Row" should not be construed as meaning that the plants must be uniformly planted. TYPE B BUFFER OPTION '1: 80' Buffer For every 100' consisting of: One row of large evergeens trees (5) One row of large evergreen shrubs (16 -18) One row of large deciduous shrubs (22 -24) OPTION 2: 20' B ufter For every 100' consisting of: One row of large deciduous trees (4) One row of large evergreen shrubs (16 -18) 6' Screening PLAN VIE ELEVATI C Roanoke County Design Handbook Chapter 2: Landscaping March 22, 2011 2 -5 Figure 2.2 -3 Type C Buffer "Row" should not be construed as meaning that the plants must be uniformly planted. TYPE C BUFFER OPTION 1: 40' Buffer For every 100' consisting of: One row of large evergeens trees (5) One row of small deciduous trees (6) One row of large evergreen shrubs (16 -18) One row of large deciduous shrubs (22 --24) OPTION 2: 30' Buffer For every 100' consisting of: One row of large deciduous trees (3) One row of large evergreen shrubs (16 -18) One row of large deciduous shrubs (22 -24) 0' Screening 'LAN VIEW _EVATION Roanoke County Design Handbook 2 -6 March 22, 2011 Chapter 2: Landscaping Figure 2.2 -4 Type D Buffer "Row" should not be construed as meaning that the plants must be uniformly planted. TYPE D BUFFER OPTION 1: 50' Buffer For every 100' consisting of: One row of large evergreen trees (5) Two rows of small deciduous trees, two different species (0 -7 per raw) PLAP OPTION 2: 35' B uffer For every 100' consisting of: One row of large deciduous trees (3) One row of small evergreen trees ( -7 ) 0' Screening d VIEW ELEVATIOP Roanoke County Design Handbook Chapter 2: Landscapin g March 22, 2011 1 2 -7 Figure 2,2 -5 Type E Buffer "Row" should not be construed as meaning that the plants must be uniforml y p lanted. TYPE E BUFFER OPTION 1: 75' Buffer For every 160' consisting of: One row of large deciduous trees (3) one row of large evergreen trees (5) One row of small deciduous trees (7) 1601 OPTION 2: 50' Buffer For every 100' consisting of: One row of large deciduous trees (3) One row of small evergreen trees (6) One row of small deciduous trees (6 -7) 6' Screening PLAN VIEW LEV, Roanoke County Design Handbook STAFF REPORT Petitioner: Western Virginia Water Authority Request: Special Use Permit for a major utility service in an R -1, Low Density Residential, District. The major utility service involves the construction of a standpipe water tank approximately 102 feet in height on 0.51 acre. Location: 4968 Northridge Lane Magisterial District: Catawba Suggested 1. The site shall be developed in substantial conformity with the concept plan Conditions: entitled "Western Virginia Water Authority Loch Haven Tank Site" dated December 23, 2011. 2. The proposed water tank shall not exceed a height of 102 feet. 3. Screening and buffering requirements for this site shall include the existing vegetation, modified to construct the proposed water tank, and the existing fencing. 4. There shall be no signage on the water tank except for the manufacturer's or installer's identification and appropriate warning signs and placards. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Western Virginia Water Authority (WVWA) is requesting a special use permit for a major utility service in order to install a 102' standpipe water tank. The primary purpose of the tank is to improve water service and fire flows in the surrounding area. Additionally, the WVWA also proposes to place a 10' side mounted antenna on the new tank as part of the WVWA 's meter replacement and automated infrastructure project. A Type E buffer is required by the use and design standards for a major utility service; however, due to the proximity of the tank to the corner of the lot, the petitioner is requesting an exemption from this requirement. This standard can be modified during the special use permit process. The proposed use meets the requirements of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and is relatively consistent with the purpose of the R -1, Low Density Residential District. The proposed water tank will be visible from surrounding neighborhoods; however, the Western Virginia Water Authority stated that the primary purpose "would be to improve water service and fire flows in the neighboring area" which is not in conflict with the Neighborhood Conservation future land use designation. Sufficient fire flow is necessary for the health, safety and welfare of the community. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS A major utility service is allowed only by special use permit in the R -1, Low Density Residential, District and is defined as "services of a regional nature which normally entail the construction of new buildings or structures such as generating plants and sources, electrical switching facilities and stations or substations, community waste water treatment plants, and similar facilities." The use and design standards for a major utility service are included in Section 30 -83 -11 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. Applicable standards are as follows: 1. In considering an application for a special use permit, the planning commission and board of supervisors shall consider the justification for the location of the proposed utility service and any alternative locations which may be available. 2. The minimum lot size may be reduced as part of approval of the special use permit provided all setback and yard requirements are met and all other dimensional requirements are achieved. 3. The height limitation contained in each district may be increased as part of the approval of the special use permit, subject to any other height limitation contained in the section 30 -72 and 30 -73 of this ordinance. 4. No major utility service shall be located within one hundred (100) feet of an existing residence. 5. Except in the 1 -1 and 1 -2 districts, outdoor storage of materials and equipment, except during construction of the utility facility, shall be prohibited in association with a major utility service, unless specifically requested and approved as part of the special use permit. 6. Buildings and facilities shall be designed and constructed to be compatible with the surrounding area, so that these facilities or structures will not adversely affect nearby properties. 7. Except in the 1 -1 and 1 -2 districts, Type E screening and buffering consistent with section 30 -92 of this ordinance shall be required, unless specifically modified as a part of the approved special use permit. 8. All sewer and water utility services shall be publicly owned and operated by a government agency unless otherwise recommended by the director of the utility department and approved by the board of supervisors. 9. Sewer and water utility services shall be designed with a service area and capacity consistent with the purposes of the respective zoning district and the recommendations of the community plan. 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background — The Western Virginia Water Authority (WVWA) is requesting a special use permit for a major utility service in order to install a 102' standpipe water tank. The primary purpose of the tank is to improve water service and fire flows in adjacent area. Additionally, the WVWA also proposes to place a 10' side mounted antenna on the new tank as part of the WVWA's meter replacement and automated infrastructure project. The 0.51 acre subject property is owned by the WVWA. There is an existing 33' tall (54' diameter) water tank on the site that was installed in the mid- 1970s. Topography /Vegetation — The subject property slopes slightly downward to the south from an approximate elevation of 1,280 feet at the northern property line. There are existing deciduous trees near three property lines. Adjacent properties heavily wooded with mature deciduous trees and slope away from the subject property. Surrounding Neighborhood - The subject property and adjacent parcels are zoned R -1, Low Density Residential. The properties to the north and west are vacant and heavily wooded. The closest residences are on Sequoia Drive, Lanasey Drive and Amberwood Court. The Northside Schools complex is zoned R -2S, Medium Density Residential with a Special Use Permit. Northside Middle School is located approximately 350' southeast of the subject property. With regard to future land use, the subject and surrounding properties are designated as Neighborhood Conservation in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The Transition, Core and Principal Industrial future land use designations are also located within a half of a mile of the subject property near major intersections and on the eastern side of Interstate 581. 2 3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout /Architecture — The applicant proposes to install a 102' tall standpipe water tank with a 30' diameter on the southeastern portion of the property in addition to the existing tank. The proposed tank will be setback 25' from the southern and eastern property lines near the limits of the existing tree line. The water tank is available in five colors including cobalt blue, sky blue, tan, forest green and white. The WVWA recommends a "sky blue color as the tank will be seen from lower elevations against the backdrop of the sky." The tank will not be lighted. A Type E buffer is required by the use and design standards for a major utility service; however, due to the proximity of the tank to the corner of the lot, the petitioner is requesting an exemption from this standard. Access /Traffic Circulation — The property is accessed through the Northside Schools complex using an access road that runs behind the middle school. VDOT had no comments on the request. Fire & Rescue /Utilities — The Roanoke County Fire Marshal's office reviewed the application and noted "the addition of the water tank to the water system will greatly improve the fire flow needs for all existing and proposed structures in the future. The improvements are very much needed in the area and the Roanoke County Fire Marshal's Office has no objection to the proposal." There should be no impact on solid waste. Community Input — A community meeting was held at Northside Middle School on February 23, 2012. Two hundred and eighty community meeting notices were mailed to property owners. Ten citizens were in attendance. Citizen questions and comments centered on the visual impact to residents on Sequoia Drive. Those in attendance asked what alternative sites were considered and how this was related to the development of the Green Ridge Recreation Center and development on Plantation Road. The WVWA indicated that no other sites had been considered as alternatives. Staff also received twelve phone calls regarding the petition. The majority of callers requested more information about the special use permit request, one inquired about the impact to the adjacent athletic fields, two wanted to "lend support" for the petition and one was from the president of the Home Owner's Association on Sequoia Drive concerned with the "cost /benefit" ratio. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The property is designated Neighborhood Conservation in the Roanoke County Community Plan. This is a future land use area where established single - family neighborhoods are delineated and the conservation of the existing development pattern is encouraged. Land use types include single - family residential, neighborhood institutional centers and neighborhood commercial. Public utilities are also briefly discussed in Chapter 4: Community Facilities. 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS The Western Virginia Water Authority is requesting a special use permit to install a 102' tall standpipe water tank on 4968 Northridge Lane in the Catawba magisterial district. The proposed use meets the requirements of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and is relatively consistent with the purpose of the R -1, Low Density Residential District. The proposed water tank will be visible from surrounding neighborhoods; however, the Western Virginia Water Authority stated that the primary purpose "would be to improve water service and fire flows in the neighboring area" which is not in conflict with Neighborhood Conservation future land use designation. Sufficient fire flow is necessary for the health, safety and welfare of the community. Suggested conditions include: 1. The site shall be developed in substantial conformity with the concept plan entitled "Western Virginia Water Authority Loch Haven Tank Site" dated December 23, 2011. 2. The proposed water tank shall not exceed a height of 102 feet. 3. Screening and buffering requirements for this site shall include the existing vegetation, modified to construct the proposed water tank, and the existing fencing. 4. There shall be no signage on the water tank except for the manufacturer's or installer's identification and appropriate warning signs and placards. CASE NUMBER: 2- 312012 PREPARED BY: Amanda C. Micklow HEARING DATES: PC: 3/6/2012 BOS: 3/27/2012 ATTACHMENTS: Application Materials Aerial Photograph Zoning Map Future Land Use Map Site Inspection Photographs R -1 Zoning District Regulations Major Utility Services Use and Design Standards 4 countv of Roanoke W Comniunit�? Devc1opment Plannin & Zonin 5204 Bernard, Drive P 0 Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (5401 776-70- 1-495 ALL APPLICANTS Check t of filod 'k-L-1ic,61 -,cl iliat app iv f 3_ 2 , For St'qff 'use Onl Date rmj6VP'dL RL-ecelved b I ;IZ I t App] ication feo- PUMA date. 'A0,00 A tit 111 amA S -L ssu e 4: BOS dalm N n b e r L. Rezonin � Special Use J Vaviana! -1 Waiver '_'Adm ire ilsirative A LJ Cou 1 P11 .1 n (15.2-2 23 2,a R c�%- i e1v A pp] i can is nam&-'address -wlzi p Phone: 853-5756 Western Vir tVater Authorit Work- 853-5756 Cell -4: 293032i 601 S. Jefferso-n Stree - t Fax No.-. Owner's na-me lad dress W,.'zip Phone 4: SaIne as a-i Work: Fax No. 4 Prop Drt Location 4968 Northrid Lane Ma inter rat Distrir,(,- Catawba Communiit Plannin area-. p Tax Map No--. 037.06-01-76*00-0000 1 Exi stirs gzoning: IRI Size of Acres: 51 Exi stirs gLand Use , Mcljor uti'LI'Ly J REZONING, PE IA L U,15E PER.4flT. lj,'AIVER A..NID CojV PLAN (15.2-2232) RE VIEW APPLICA NT-,'V ( WS4Vj(-F ) Propo&ed Zonin R1 with special u - Ct1� ti ?ropc--psed Lan d U ie: m P i r� to i i � I A c% +, -n " A , 4 --%rN rpr. j Does the pare r- I meet f h c n i r. i m u m lot area. -wi dth, an d fronta re L - Fern pints Of th C rC LICS I ed distr i cl? Yes 6 No 11 If NO, A VARIANCE IS ICE. Qt1JRFD FIRST, Does the parcel, rne et the minim im criteri a for tho re Use T 1 ) c, r" Yes FX No r_8 IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REUIRED FIRST If M_Zonin re arer conditions brin prWered with this r-o.. Ycq NO L � I n/a VA RIA N CF WA I PER A ND A D jumsm.4 rr VE A I TE'A L A I k P1 I CA oV I S (Vl W./A A) Vari ance.)'Waj ver of Sectic -_1 lr' : ) of th� RoanokL Count Zonin Ordinance in order to I . A ppe al DY Zonin Administrator's Jeoci,si on. to .Appeal of Inter tat of Seat io - of the Roanoke Count Zortin Ordinance A 1 3 pe a I o f I nterptetafl or, of Zonin Map to 9 Is the application complete? Pleae r,*z5cki1f enclosed. APPLICATION WILL N WE ACCEPTEID IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE, MSMUP VVAA FU S5VICT WAA 'RJ"._7CP VJAA GDFAUIU6011 81/211 X t co-neepi plwl Applic.1tion f o Appli cat inn Metes an bounds d,Mri,ntion Ffoffers if applica Jus ti ficadov. - cat - on Ai U oin Ln pr o water allid W�VL�_T appi I I d' ' ' rotm rN_ owners I herr'b cerfi t hat I BJn C i I hCF 111 woonc! r a l'i he propert or the mvrcr's;m t or CORtTac I purch&ser and arn actin with lh-E knom led arid consent of the owner, des tern /y ir g inia eater Authority OA-nff's Si b 2 Subs ti to to Page- 3 i4• .'l+i, e]w {% -�,`. `'t 4jL A • �"iit •�-!.= �`- .: �• i i=... .i: .R• r� -- �i4 • �r i 1 S" i�.' -' r!! L a's �'! ..5 - ' -f'•" ..7�: :::. - 'd 'i 'F -•. -. - - � { i - .' i - i' 7 .eft " �� ��$: 1' ;ti� '{Y�a - .•. = �- -'� ]. a: • is .x i' • i � .�• t ,:t f S• S •'� .?�_ � � � �� �4 dl��� { is . 'a ' � .� :'• .� yy -�� .4�' � i _ � .� tt gg �. _], _ fit. ��. -° �� �i"Ci `,'2 - �` � ed. :r.'` . .'iT`aa -a. .. .. � e ^. ••] � _ , �i i. •.xr.. : +.: _ �'•` � -• I -s.. 'i�= `�.�; ?: ;i ,a.�;'�:. _ sa`; *•k> ` -7 ..,_� - _ .3� .rp: ar. y-:� -' . lF � . Y i - F;.:�.� - -` S •r: z_ f t" �i:. .. j ...L _ .�= .�:-: S3 ` .' ;•r -� v. 1 � 1 •1 � " - : • '. ..�i[`, ' x .x�> .a . �. .,rte.. Wiz" • - +l ;�•g4n .� ��' d I • > F ' • n7i"" 7r F :`l. -ii"v S. S. �S" yy �N ° l!�.- C. .� . ". �, f. ��.. ;E..� a•�•' r 4'# t ��' ���'� .s •�- - =2' .ei"'•. .v - :: ` Z ! .t t. .IT i.. d.i; .I'. :: r {. '1-- :','.' j r f. ! 1. �(? ':e• r t' t 's . • -u fi ��' ��_ 's '•l =•'� . �; r t! � � r. Y -.- `i�:[ -� :•�'t -: - r .d... .•] id. a .. { .: - fi'.! -' Y' `... �..�- 1... �,.'_ "iii:. t : -•: •: x -. l..= 't �.':..':•- -' F ;. .'�. i.Y!Ta• �t3•�.: � :i•'... Y .. 7.zt :r, _ r �i App 5cant The Plans ing Caxnm s. Jon will study rezoning, -�pedal use pern W'Mver for eornmunity plan .(15.2 -2232) reVie requests to , det mmi r e the need and m6fioation foT tb change In terms of p- jabbc. heafth, sal^ , - and general welfare. Pease lansWer the :- ollOW ng cluestions as : thor as _possible. Use .additional space f.necessar � r Please •explain bout furth the purposes - -of the Roanoke County OTffinance :as well as tbe purpose t'ound at the b ling of ,the applicahl e zoxiing district :61a sif ca.fion in the .honing ordinance. The utf:ity tank site is acU�ssed through the North -ide ugh Scbool athl eti c fiold The water tangy color can be an earth tone color .or a sky blue 7DDIor The Water - AuthOn - ty reco a sky blue color as the tank- ill be seen from- lower elevations against the 'back of the k)7. There will be a 1 G -foot side mount antenna attached- t o the watfhr tank for use by the Western Vlrgi'm* a Water A as part , of its - am- tomated- meter nfrastra tie (see. diseussl :on of automated meter infrastradure below). The applicant is me f•esting an mi cmpt or from the Typ s reeving n fferYng on the southeast 0 0M. er of its :lot due to the prox=ty of the tank to the corner. The, applicant is - asldaag that the T {c aa nu d on attacbed - sheet. See "Type F41) Please explain how °th Projeot oonforn. - s to the general :ga defines and Policies contained M the Roanoke C. oun� on unI Plan. The Wafer .A-uthori = has contracted. pith .bone �eI1. t� � , Inc. for the desi of the propDsed prof act and as paTt of th prod eat, Honeywell, Inc. Chas , conducted a propagfion study In NvIn b it has - analyzed the - most :eff .dlent system for transmitting grater usage data from careless meters to in a centrahzt:A b nag system. The propagation stud init�-a_Uy identified 62 potential locations Roanoke' City -and in Roanoke ou� in order to pro - kride the coNrerag-e neebssary for the overall transmission system. The Water Authority, Working in -collaboration N th .H3one)rw(,n- • n.p., ha.s narrowed. the number of antennas d,O)? M to 9 or 10, all - but - lone of ch will °be place. 4 -on existing or plarm ed wafer tanks.. LL As a =result of the pro 'agatior stud; the Water - :utb - ority. is :seeki to install tie fawest numbeer of antennas to transrut that. water , usage, data (eonti ued on attached .sheet,. Soe "`usage .ta'� Pl ease .describ the :hnpact( - s) - ofth e :sequ•est on th.e property itself, the -adjoining pr�gei ties, and _the surrounding area, as w ell as the -impacts on public servioes and faoil iti es, Mcl tiding Water/sewer, roads, schools, pFarks /reo'reation and .fire and :tescue. The proposod. new- - a(ter tarp. NA71th antenna. could. be seen: from the ne ghbormng area. Vi8ibilig e will l ikely be - i ` -F. ed due to the - improved. water pressure and fire flows that - MU. be available once the new tank is put fin 3 (continued from "... Type E) screening be modified as it backs up to an existing educational facility and not to a residential facility. The applicant is asking for credit for existing vegetation and will supplement existing vegetation on three sides to fulfill the option to 50 -foot buffer and for every 100 feet will plant one row of large deciduous trees, one row of small evergreen trees and one row of small deciduous trees with six -foot screening. The proposed water tank would be installed in addition to the 40 -foot ground level water tank currently on the property. The 40' existing tank will be retained to maintain water pressure in its current distribution zone. The height of the proposed water tank is 102 feet and a 10 -foot antenna would be attached. This use is compatible with residential development in the area. It is anticipated by the western Virginia water Authority that the neighboring properties would welcome the new water tank because of the increased water pressure that would be available from its installation. The proposed water tank would serve a dual purpose for the western Virginia water Authority. The primary purpose would be to improve water service and fire flows in the neighboring area. The water Authority also proposes to place a 10 -foot antenna on the new tank which would be used in the water Authority's meter replacement and automated meter infrastructure pro* ect proposed to be installed in the City of Roanoke and in Roanoke County. (continued from "..usage data") in the most efficient manner. This property is one of the locations. The new tank will improve water pressure and fire flows in the area. CONCEPT MAN C1 IECKLIST A cone Cpl plan 0 f ( he proposed p ro e0t m u&I � e submil tted with flee app lica t [o n The c on cept p ian sh all graph ica 11 y dep IN the il and use ch an dev �J op m en t or va r I an � v, i hat is to be con sidcrtd, F u rt hE,,r, th-e pJ an s ha I I addtess an pole rit -_ a I lard Uge- OF deli g n :1 s s ues arisi n from t he re ii e st, In s Lich casts 'Invo I v ii n rc-.zonhn g s, I he t h p rop r appl i-4. -use rat de ve I c pim-en of te, e ty ra nt m a prof fer cond it i on s to [JU it ihe fut u re reg a u lati ons. , and b so doing, correct an deficiencies 1hat ma not be rnana b Count P .E.-r-Mittin g T lie con pit p I an shoul d n of be coin Nsed wit h the s i to p I a n or pi of p I an that is re uiTed pr ior to the i,s&u ante of -a bu 11din pem i t. S i te pi an an d bu i Id -1 In P erm it procedurrs ens-u re co M p] I an ce with State and Co unt d PYtlopmen t TV I ation s an d ma re uire. dian t z e initial concept plan. Unless lirn'Ri"'in Conditions are proffered and aocepted in a rezonin impoacd on a spccial US& UF VaFl are Ct, the, concept plan rneLv be a[te-red- io th& extcrt perm illedb the, zonin distriecand oib-er re .A A c k i n ep.1 p I an i S re u i red w it all I r ekori in g , s peo la I u s o peg nii t, 1-vaj Yer, commu nit p I an (15 .- 2 ) rev i ew !tn d v;n ria n cv. app I I c actions . 7he plan s hou Id be prepared b a p ro, P-s s ii 0 1 1 a I it e plan ner. The level of detai I ni a v ar depend in .') n Cie ri a [ ure o f tht re The Ca-unr� P I an n i n D 1 vi si on staff ma exempt son i e. o F t I Dry e- a 1111S bui the �Jjc i terris or su t t hQ add j of xtr ite Nlowing are considered rainimum-, AL� APPLICANTS a. App l;cant Parae and narne,of development b� Date, scale and north a c. Lot size in �cres or s feet and dimensions V/ d P Location, names of ownersand Roanoke COULnt tax map numbers of adjoinin properties e. Ph fcatwes such as g round cover, natural watercours 'es , floodp lain , etc. f, 7 he zon i n an d I an d use o f a 1.1 ad' a mit prop evi es g . Ail propert lines and casements I All buildiri exist.in and proposed, and dimensions, fluor area and hei 'IN] d L11.5 ;Vld na rues o f a I I �x istiri or platted streets or other public wa s wi tt in or adj acen t tot he development D i ill ev s 1 an wi d I o c ati ons of al I drivewa s, p arki n s C.'s a nd I oad i n spaGe's A ddhional b rc!t REZ. ONING and3PE J ,, �)' . AJV7 , S k. Existin U :1 it j es (wa ter, sewer, sto rm d rain-s' and on nections ac fli-e site V' 1. An drlwwa en trap cesi ts curb op en in and cro&so v v" m Topo m, ap in a suilable &,.alleand contour intervals ri� Approximate s(rect g races and site distarmcs at lintersectioris 0. Locations of all adjacent fire. h p. A n pro ffc.rcad conditi on-5 at tip e L i to rid h ow they are addressed q . I fproject is to be p based,, pleas sho -sy ph ase � c heda 1,e, I cerl if t hat a items -u iTed i n the rhec kl 1 st --ut bcn ve are. --o -i- p Westeft V inia Watez- thorit 4W 9 1 b Januar 6, 2QJ2 Si of app licaint M m D ate R1 ATTACHMENTS FOR 4965 NORTHRIDGE LANE APPLICATION 1. Photo of typical standpipe water tank 2. 12 page pamphlet on Aqua store tanks and domes 3. 16 page specifications for Aqua store tank 4. Concept Plan (6 pages) (includes computerized terrain analysis) 5. List of adjoining property owners with names, addresses (mailing addresses including zip codes) and tax map numbers. 6. Subject property description (source deed; 8 pages) 7. Check for $40 to process application (copy) 8. Engineering drawing of existing tank *Photo simulation from balloon test -- to be scheduled at a later time *water and Sewer application and plan metric maps are not applicable w. k-16 Northrid I Ulass Tanks with a Heart of S Nor, All Ll'quid g moor En Stora Products Compan (E P) has a lon and storied histor of turnin rave steel into the fi nest stora tanks available, Our uni- g lass-fused-to-steel techn olro vvas intro d uc e d mo re t h a n 150 y ea rs a for dr bay I k a g ricultu ra I a Iii at i on s. 7b d a, ES PC 1 s ded icaled to the d e si fa bri ca ti o n a n d I nsta Nation of 9 la fu se ckto-st e el sectional to n k s. M oie ihan 1 OD,000 9 1 ass-fu sed-to- steel tanks have been inatalled in over 70 countries around :,he world,. Th e g lass-f used-to- steel tee h n o I o 9 y wa s i ntro d u c ed to the li stora market in the nnid-1970s as -RA q uastoreO." After more t h a n 30 y ea rs of p rover performance, A tanks have become the preforred choice for potable water stora and man of h ar [i q u i d app i i ration s. With tens of thou s a nd s- of S@ I i sfi ed cu sto me r s. A tan ks are 'en to be the ver best. Glass-f Used-to-eteel hes becorne the pre m lurn water and li stora technolo leader. A owners choose g lass-f U sed-to -steel technolo over ath e r to nk desi for s ever al re so ns: * Lowest maintenance re q uirements over tank life * Great er hif at e va lu e verso s vv e I dcM or concrete tanks Fastgr construction — Eas assembl without cranes or special e Expandable to actornmodate future re Available in diameters from 11 feet (3-S M) t0 204 feet (62.2 rn) and capacit from 20,ODD g allons (75 ou rn) to ove r 6 m 111 Ion g all on s (22,700 cu m) SPecific tank desi options and accessories to meet customer needs ESPC desi and rnanufactures a wide ran 9 p, of tanks in an ISO 9001:2.00.0 certified facilit to meet a wi de ran of sta nd a As, in clu d i n 9 AWWA U 103 — Bolted Steel Water Stora Tanks, AI SC, 113C. NBCC. FM and NFPA Standard 22. U3WE I As-surance y ou Will the hi en q ualit y , best service, lon product; 1 e and g reatest value A in li stora tanks.. Glass�F­used�t;O�SUeel Factor En neered " T " Eng i neered " Glass-f u sad-to-steel is the pr em iu m I-echriolo in the tank market- Glass; coati n ph properties are Speciall suited to rnunicipall and industrial stora applications. The factor silica glass coatin on q ua tore tanks forms a hard. inert barrier for both the interior and exteri&r tank, surfaces to g uard a weat r and corrosion. Glass-fused-to-steel is impermeable to li and vapors. controls und arc ut-tin causod b corrosion and offers excellent impact and abrasion fesis tar ce. The color won't fade or chalk and most g raffiti ca-i ea sill be -emoved. It never needs paintin • A multi -step p rotes s I s t h e h ea Tt of t he g lass- f u aeL_ad - to - apt ee I techno,lo s • Fabricated shoots are 9 f it blasted to a unitofm, near white surface Proprietar f U latlor):S of borosillicale, minerals. water and cla are blended into a sp,ra slurr callle�d I.Slip" After Ospection, the slurr is fused to the steel sheets al temperawres above 1,5cw r (811ST C) to produce the d I i ncti ve 9 , os s A ua store g I a ss fl n i A Th & mo Iten g I a as reacts w 1 th the p r of led stee I surface to form an inert, inor chemical and mechanical bond A 60be-akhe-srr porcefair, enamour' hicrwe insialled in 2.00a A new., State-of-the-art porcelain eviamelin fuinac-e vua s i nsta, I I ed at ES PC in 2006. The wo r I d's I a r g est an hi efficienc porcelain L -enamel furnace, it improves q ualit y , saves ener increases prod ict.on and speeds deliver c>f 9 1ass-fused-to-sleel products to cus tom ors. I n a H. five ad va n ce d to m pe r to re coraTo I zones ra u I ate the coat g process to produce extremel hi q ualit y sheets ever time. After mechanic O beve (;n rh e she,.m.r ed the es are rherma8 Spnoye iTh a -5rain) ess; steel a[?O B01t holes are covered with Sealant durin assembl so metal is not exposed to the air or the stored pvcdact- Ed Protection ES-PC" S proprieMr Ed process thermal[ spra the sheet ed with a pretest °e stainless steel alla before the g lass finish is applied to the ent I re sh eet for F,U a X I M U m p rotection. T 4, 6 i A Ulaw -I'Ll'sed- to-.Steel P anels Uri the pradactfon ernes W LL ir eace oPm Mind Vitrium Technology f-% I ESPC s unen-di n rommitment to pr lust J Mn rovement ha s r Ito J i i) -the dev e I o pmem of ESPC's new t glass inn-avation — VitriumUd, This CO3tin combines the outst chernical and ph resistant properties of tit ar)jum g lass with a hi en ultra-fine g lass bubble s1r.icture, This P 'Tocess results in hi performance g I e s s4 u se d -to -steel te-Oh n o I o gy . Vitr i-u m feat u res an d b4nefits include: Maximum coatin effectivene r i r i n increased coatinn the r-_knP.,r,- q * uni process technoloc provi factor certifi ed ho I i da e" s h eels * Process efficiencies lead to Clompelitive pric ire c * Ideal fc>- both cold and ho-. climates Tou Ti g lassi formulations provide lon life ""as I Elevroslatic base coat application en sums 01 -9 f t- C, �o O (,9 ted t I pro-Juce the distvi --, rive ca it blu cDnsistent q uak y Aquas rore gd ccafh Inter4op Face i Base 5t &Ol 8 1 n ter 1 Dr A Coat ■ 68Se GiaSS CCa White To CC St ateriiDr' Fctce ■ Basta Steel Exterior A C,!;kat 0 cobak Blue Top Cwt - I ;ern one IOU 6iE UJ "C Ever A tank, is factor en to cistoTer Specificatic't.ris- Sinioe all k*- n U-1-e maimifactured i n the f a cto r a n d eas i I i a s sern b led., A re tan ks, can be installed in rnan t ut weather conditions why e n fie Id - vvel.d ed st Lae, I and o=n cret e tanks r..-a n riot Tanks are assembled fro rn the top ckwii-i b factor trained buildin crews with � j ackin g s that pro elevates the structure without the, need for expensive cry, ries, Erection crews can may safel on the g round. This construction method enables rapid, lo pro for timel completion. Floors A floors can he g lass-fuse-d-to-steell or r of ced concrete. A f I a t stee I f loor i s I i n ed wit h q ua sto re 9 llass- fuse -to - steel sh eets. Wh e n usi n g concrete, A walls are embeddled an the foundation. Authoriz q uastore Deal s can provide site preparation and foundation installation. Sidewa I I s Sidewall raction is completed usin a series of spec iali designed motorized j acks. Each g lass - fused- to-steel panel is, bolted and sealed into place. Upon completion, the motorized j raise the id all rin so subse rin can be erected- Erectin an A u aztore, to n k does not re u 1 re he av c ra n es or littin e on-site. This uni installation pr ess allows for construction in remote re as well as imet-opolitan areas. Roots or Dom en All A store roofs or dornes. are free span (do not rec col,umns to support) and are 'Installed on tho tanks in the initial phase of constfuction. Glass-fused- to-steel roo re available up to 31 In. diameter and aluminum g eodesic domes are available in all si7os. Glass-f used -to-steel roofs are manufactured wit hand toolin and include radiall sectioned steel panals. The roofs are ass ruble usin the same seal. and boltin techni thesidewall panels. A store f roe spa n, alum inn m g eodesic domes are a va I la b [e I o r th e corn p I to ran e of A a st o re tan ks. The are c=structed with ri orb -(-,orru trian aluminum P anels interlockemd b a truss. s with wide flan ex1rusions, Oomen can be desi to each individual custor-n is needs, takin -into accour't wind, snow loadtn sefstnic and desir codes- El 6- .te Mow kv, L Al So- T -Airr r- dr Aric • wilp - L- ti IL UP r Im L a e va ntages of Aouestore a hard to y beat. It i s a i m ply the be st q a I it y , I Dees - lb T � X Q 49 1 1 & I t W kr rr�.��r�t�r��e I�L!� 1 ■� � 1 k�� �����1h al a b l_ �bm ors eider th ese a d va ntages. - NEVER NEEDS PAI NTI N - _ M n lm i maintanaroc required' over tare, life a Wi l n of corrode o r rust . g uaranteed ta nk performa warr nt y TAI r rp- key s r i c -es by n Aut horized Aq ua sto r De a l er f r m a ppto va i d rawi ings to t a re . testi ng N need for c ranes o r otlie large q u i m ent for erection Erect A i remo cludec location _ & 'r i n i m i e lo cons tructi on (J ays d to Yvea _ delays or field -applied coating Design Aquastore for tutu; e xpansion or relocation Parnove m ost rah ti e E - The biggest e on orn is a dvantage is that a n _ a ! v W = A questors tan never heads pa i ntin ! The budgeted dollars that be may used to repair a concrete n . F o r re pi nt a we I dd tarp k eve r — 12 yea rs can b q div rted to other municipal r yr�d�a trial needs, Co rtc rete to rI ks a re ex pen live, ] nvolve I on ri s t ru ction p er i od s, nee d I ota of ro= to u a nd a re not a Irwa " ma isite c a fry '. 1.) e sia n s pecifications a llow for a s mal l level of I e kI n i and some level of cracking 1 basically expected. Co nc rete tanks usua lly take? l onge r to c o7i st ruc t than an q uas tore.. Welded tan can have lla- lead a nci n st r u ct i o n ' low. tiI`i"I . They a r-e lirni by externa e nviro nme (al factor when be i n g erected and fi-eld-coated. _ 'Welded tanks ra have high m a int an a rice cost and m u st b e pa I rated rn u Iti pl e t i rnes over their life cyc Their Irrant is typically on one year after installation, O aint;enanc Ground Stora Tank Stantipipe Composite Elevated Clarifier AM n - -� d" ion Anaerobic Digestion A u q -, as ore Feat;ure Accessories The A store basilic s consists CC * Glass-fused-to-steel sidewalls • Iadder, ca and platform • Cathodic protection Gravit vent Glass -fu sed-to-stee4 roofs or aluminum g eodesic A Roof, dome and siNewell manwa • Overflow pipes Hardware and sealant re to assemble the tank 0 Cathodic Protectioln A n A u actor e tan Vs cathod is protectio n s m u ses sa c r I f c] n I an ades to protect th e. reirDforcin bars, miti corrosion and provide protection to internal su bm er su ria ces of I he to n K. I t i s in co rporated i nto the A uastora tan Ws wa rra nt () GIravit %lent A tank aravit vents are desi to allow for air exchan durin fillin . and empt The are e with coTrosion-resistant bird and trisect scree n s- Ladder, Ca and Platform A tank ladders are c of aluminum ra i Is 3 d run with hot-dip g alvanized ca and step off platforms- Ladders vwith lockin safet ca doors are evade kyle. 0 Sidewall Manwa A q o re to n k rna n wa are C105;i in accordance with AWWA D103 Standards. The a re 24 inc h es (61 C M) 30 inches (76 cm) or 3611-riches (91 em') in, diameter and are manufactured with hot-dip g a I va n !zed o r smi n less steel. it MT S, 0 Hardware and Sea lerats Th e ha rdvva re and see I a n (s for A castor -ass m I aresupplied with each order, Spec!fi c t sLich as chl grin e resistant sealants o­. hardware with protec,- .iv e colvers, are made for the individual applicatic?n Heav d u& plastic bolt caps are also available for added protection. Addiuional opt;ions and accessories, Additional accessories are available to meet usve and specification needs. Accessories include: * Colors * Caps end sealer * Nozzles Baffles Root wa I kwa r I i ri a n d staff r ses Level indicators Cape and Sealer Durable plastic bolt caps offer ad d-e d protection a weather and corros'bn. For specialized apLpllcations, sealer a Itern at Ives a re -a va i I a blo. Nozzles and Baffles N o z zles and baff les a re av,a i la b I & de parod in CJF) tank use and specifications. En flexibilit a 110*6 th ese accesso ne s to be i ncorpo rated 1 nto ovary ll tank desii ways, R.Ivr., , Walk and Sty ircayes An option to the 1 4 standard, ladder and ca Is a walkwa and staircase. A walkwa are fiDt-dip g alvanized steel and are -a pproprhate for OA situatiDns when re overhoad tank access 1 S re ired. 6 Dth wia I kwa and sta i rc a ws are available from y our local AUth Or i2ed Dea ,le r. Level In-;tars f)u rable a nd function a], the li level indicator i,q a utility r i a n o ption that can be installed as part of the assembf operation. Service A g lass coatin are available in standard cobalt blug or four other exterior colors. Forest g reen, sk b I ue, de se rt to n or vvh it cc lo rs a re a va i le b le, In fo r -c u lo n^ colors. I nte r1i or color - s a lwa * h 1 to. " B est in Industry Warranty En Storage Products Compan offers a g 1 5 or 10 y ear wa r(arit dopen di n a n i ndividuall customer � ppJication and tank specifications. It is one more indicalion that q ua for tanks are desiped to last. Authorized A Dealers ESPC delivers A tanks throu a network of Authori2ed Ai era stowa Dealers. These or and iheir sales rep TeGentatives are 3 ilable to discuss pro re a wl merts f rom Inception to Completion. Experience in y o u re and application knowled are valluable durin all sta from pro development to specification to erection to the complete nd tested tan Pricir, bu d et eat I riat-es., fou n dation I a, pro'ect c h ed u I ire g .approva I d ravin a n d tDu rid ation construction we j ust a- of the a rea s w he re Authorized Dee le rs ca n he I, 0 u r c u stc me. rs deal wft h o ne sou rce f ro m sta rt -o finish, includin serv'ce after Installation. Dealers are trgined to provide superior custome- 8eRrice- Find y our nearest q ua tore deal-aF in the dealer 1000tOF sect ian at mow. a tore, com. Tanks & Domes Glass Tanks with a Heart of Steel"' ENGINEERED STORAGE PRODUCTS COMPANY 345 Harvestare Drive, DeKalb, 111-1nois 60115 Phone: 815-756-1551, Fax-r 815-756-7821 www,o e-mail: sales@a C 2007. Ac Ond U. Ed [Ife J Ad" t I a --!i C Q rn, po n oP Engineered Stour Pr, OvQ�.. Vibrlu rn is a rrad em n rk nP Er I n �o, r-a d _SA_6.br-6 P"6uct;s Compan4. SPECIFICATION FOR AQUASTORE TANK GLASS COATED, BOLTED STEEL MUNICIPAL POTABLE WATER STORAGE TANK AS MANUFACTURED BY ENGINEERED STORAGE PRODUCTS COMPANY 1 GENERAL 1.1 scope of work . Furnish and erect a glass - fused -to -steel bolted water storage tank, including foundation, tank structure and tank appurtenances as shown on the submittal drawings and described herein. 1.1.2 All required labor, materials and equipment shall be included. 1.2 Qualifications of Tank Supplier 1.2.1 The Engineer's selection of factory applied glass-fused-to-steel bolted tank construction for this facility has been predicated upon specific criteria, construction methods, and an optimum coating for resistance to internal and external tank corrosion. Deviations from the specified design, construction or coating details, will not be permitted. 1.2.2 The bidder shall offer a new tank structure as supplied from a U.S.A manufacturer specializing in the design, fabrication and erection of factory applied glass- fused -to -steel bolted tanks. The manufacturer shall own and operate its production plapt, fabricate and glass coat the tank at one U.S.A. location. The manufacturer shall employ a staff of full time design engineers. 1.2.3 The tank shown on the submittal drawings and specified herein is a model Aquastore® Tank as manufactured by Engineered Storage Products Company of DeKalb, Illinois. 1.2.4 Alternate glass- fused -to -steel bolted tank products, as provided by other manufacturers, will be considered for prior approval by the Engineer. Manufacturers lacking the experience requirement of tank installations will not be considered. 1.2.5 Strict adherence to the standards of design, fabrication, erection, product quality, and long term performance established in this Specification will be required by the owner and Engineer. 1.2.5 Tank suppliers wishing to pre- qualify shall submit the following to the Engineer /Owner for consideration: 1.2.6.1 Typical structure and foundation drawing(s). 1.2.5.2 List of tank materials, appurtenances and tank coating specifications. Part Number 257740 -004 ECN 04108 Rel. 1 Northridge 3 1.2.5.3 List of 10 tanks in potable water service in the nroiect state or count designed to AWVVA D 103 Standard, of equal or greater size and character specified herein, operating satisfactorily for a minimum of 5 years, including the name and telephone number of Owner and Engineer. 1.2.5.4 Certification from tank manufacturer that the tank meets all tank design standards listed in Section 2.0. 1.2.7 Only bids from U.S.A. tank suppliers who have successfully pre - qualified will be considered, 1.2.8 To minimize the liability to the owner the tank supplier shall provide the embedded concrete foundation design. No third party designs will be accepted. 1.2.9 The distributor who sells and installs the tank must be a licensed general contractor in the United States or project country regularly engaged in this type of tank construction and can meet the installation experience as noted in 1.2.5.3. Distributors (or factory representatives) lacking this tank installation experience will NOT be considered. 1.2.10 The Engineer reserves the right to evaluate all bids based on long term, 30- 40 year minimum operation, coating and maintenance costs. Values to be used in this evaluation will be at the discretion of the Engineer, as detailed in this specification and bid tabulation form. The Engineer will add such costs, dependent upon the type of tank offered, to the bidder's price to determine the effective low bid for purposes of making the award, 1.3 Submittal Drawings and Specifications 1.3.1 Construction shall be governed by the Owner's drawings and specifications showing general dimensions and construction details, after written approval by the Engineer of detailed erection drawings prepared by the tank bidder. There shall be no deviation from the Owner's drawings and specifications, except upon written order from the Engineer. 1.3.2 The bidder is required to furnish, for the approval of the Engineer and at no increase in contract price, sets of complete specifications and construction drawings for all work not shown in complete detail on the submittal drawings. A complete set of structural calculations shall be provided for the tank structure and foundatio All such submissions shall be stamped b a Licensed Professional Engineer licensed in the state of p roject location. That en ineer shall be ern to ed on the tank manufacturer's enqineering staff. 1.3.3 When approved, two sets of such prints and submittal information will be returned to the bidder marked "APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION" and Part Number 257740 -000 ECN 04108 Rel. 1 these drawings will then govern the work detailed thereon. The approval by the Engineer of the tank supplier's drawings shall be an approval relating only to their general conformity with the bidding drawings and specifications and shall not guarantee detail dimensions and quantities, which remains the bidder's responsibility. 1.3.4 The tank manufacturer's standard published warranty shall be included with submittal information. 1.3.5 The dealer shall include the tank manufacturer's standard operation and Maintenance Manual upon receipt of approved drawings. 2.1 Tank Size 2.1.1 The factory coated glass- fused -to -steel bolted tank shall have a nominal diameter of feet, with a nominal sidewall height (to roof eave) of feet. 2.2 Tank capacity 2.2.1 Tank capacity shall be gallons (nominal, U.S. gallons) at feet liquid depth. 2.3 Floor Elevation 2.3.1 Finished floor elevation shall be set at Elev. 2.4 Tank Design Standards 2.4.1 The materials, design, fabrication and erection of the bolted steel tank shall conform to the AWWA Standard for "Factory - Coated Bolted Steel Tanks For Water Storage" - ANSI/AWWA D103, latest revision. 2.4.2 The tank coating system shall conform solely to Section 10.4 of ANSI /AWWA D103 latest revision. E ox alvanized or stainless steel bolt together tanks are not considered a ual to lass- fused -to -steel tank and will not be considered. 2.4.3 The vitreous coating on the tank, bolt head encapsulation material, and joint sealant shall have been approved for listing under ANSIINSF Standard 51 for Indirect Additives. 2.5 Design Loads (Complete the blanks) 2.5.1 Tank Design Allowable Code: AWWA D1 03 or AISC. European Standard EN 15232 is not considered equal and will not be accepted. 2.5.2 Specific Gravity 1.0(Min. design shall be 1.0) 3 Part Number 267740 -000 ECN 04108 Rel. 1 2.5.3 Design Freeboard 12(inches) 2.5.4 Wind Velocity mph (ASCE 7 -05 Std. 150 mph) 2.5.5 Allowable Soil Bearing Capacity psf (Per Eng.'s Soils Report) 2.5.6 Roof Snow Load 15psf 2.5.7 Earthquake Seismic Zone, AWWA D103, 2.5.7.1 AWWA D 103 zo n e 2.5.7.1.1 Site Amplification Factor, S, 1.0. 2.5.7.1.2 Use (Importance) Factor, 1, 1.0 3 MATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS 3.1 Plates and Sheets; Note: All steel shall be smelted and produced in the United States of America. 3.1.1 Plates and sheets used in the construction of the tank shell, tank floor (when supplied) and tank roof, shall comply with the minimum standards of AWWA D103, latest edition. 3.1.2 Design requirements for mild strength steel shall be ASTM Al 011 Grade 30 with a maximum allowable tensile stress of 14,556 psi, 3.1.3 Design requirements for high strength steel shall be ASTM A1011 Grade 50 with a maximum allowable tensile stress of 25,000 psi. 3.1.4 The annealing effect created from the glass coated firing process shall be considered in determining ultimate steel strength. In no event shall a yield strength greater than 50,000 psi be utilized for calculations detailed in AWWA D103, Sections 3.4 and 3.5. 3.1,5 Multiple vertical bolt line sheets and plates of ASTM A607 Grade 50 only shall be manufactured such that holes are staggered in the vertical bolt lines and that no two ad'oinin holes are in -line horizontally, except at the center of the sheet or plate. When multiple vertical bolt line sheets and plates of ASTM A1011 Grade 50 are used, the effective net section area shall not be taken as greater than 85% of the gross area. 3.2 Rolled Structural Shapes 3.2.1 Material shall conform to minimum standards of ASTM A36 or ASTM A992. 3.3 Horizontal Wind Stiffeners 3.3.1 Design requirements for intermediate horizontal wind stiffeners shall be of 4 Part Number 267740 -000 EcN 04108 Rel. 1 the "web truss" tYIDe with an extended tail creatin multi le lavers of stiffener, permitting wind loads to be distributed around the tank. 3.3.2 Web truss stiffeners shall be of steel with hot dipped galvanized coating. 3.3.3 Rolled steel angle stiffeners are not permitted for use as intermediate horizontal wind stiffeners. 3.4 Bolt Fasteners 3.4.1 Bolts used in tank lap joints shall be Y2" - 13 UNC- 2A rolled thread, and shall meet the minimum requirements of AVVWA D103, Section 2.2. 3.4.2 Bolt Material 3.4.2.1 SAE J429 Grade 2 (1" bolt length) 3.4.2.1.1 Tensile Strength - 74,000 psi Min. 3.4.2.1.2 Proof Load - 55,000 psi Min. 3.4.2.1.3 Allowable shear stress with threads excluded from the shear plane - 18,153 psi Min. 3.4.2.2 SAE J429 Grade 5 (1 114" bolt length) 3.4.2.2.1 Tensile Strength - 120,000 psi Min. 3.4.2.2.2 Proof Load - 85,000 psi Min. 3.4.2.2.3 Allowable shear stress with threads excluded from the shear plane — 29,454 psi Min. 3.4.2.3 SAE J429 Grade 8 (>1 114" bolt length) 3.4.2.3.1 Tensile Strength - 150,000 psi Min. 3.4.2.3.2 Proof Load - 120,000 psi Min. 3.4.2.3.3 Allowable shear stress with threads excluded from the shear plane -- 35,818 psi Min. 3.4.3 Bolt Finish - Zinc, mechanically deposited. 3.4.3.1 2.0 mils (0.002 inches) Min. - under bolt head, on shank and threads. 3.4.4 Bolt Head Encapsulation 3.4.4.1 High impact polypropylene copolymer encapsulation of entire bolt head up to the splines on the shank. 5 Part Number 287744 -040 ECN 04108 Ref. 1 3.4.4.2 Resin shall be stabilized with an ultraviolet light resistant material such that the color shall appear black. 3.4.4.3 The bolt head encapsulation shall be certified to meet the ANSI/NSF Standard 61 for indirect additives. 3.4.5 All bolts on the vertical tank wall shall be installed such that the head portion is located inside the tank, and the washer and nut are on the exterior. 3.4.6 All lap joint bolts shall be properly selected such that threaded portions of the bolts will not be exposed to the "shear plane" between tank sheets. 3.4.7 Bolt lengths shall be sized to achieve a neat and uniform appearance. Excessive threads extending beyond the nut after torquing will not be permitted. 3.4.8 All lap joint bolts shall include a minimum of 4 splines on the underside of the bolt head at the shank in order to resist rotation during torquing. 3.5 Sealants 3.5.1 The lap joint sealant shall be a one component, moisture cured, polyurethane compound. The sealant shall be suitable for contact with potable water and shall be certified to meet ANSl1NSF Additives Standard 61 for indirect additives. 3.5.2 The sealant shall be used to seal lap joints and bolt connections and edge fillets for sheet notches and starter sheets. The sealant shall cure to a rubber -like consistency, have excellent adhesion to the glass coating, love shrinkage, and be suitable for interior and exterior use. 3.5.3 Sealant curing rate at 73 °F and 50% RK 3.5.3.1 Tack -free time: 6 to 8 hours. 3.5.3.2 Final cure time: 10 to 12 days. 3.5.4 Neoprene gaskets and tape type sealer shall not be used. 3.5.5 The sealant shall be Manus Sealer No. 98. 3.5.6 Due to poor compatibility with chlorine the sealant Sika 1A shall NOT be used on water storage tanks. Sika 'IA should only be used in special non-potable water applications. 6 Part Number 267740 -000 FCN 04108 Re l. 1 4.1 Surface Preparation 4.1.1 Following the decoiling and shearing process, sheets shall be steel grit - blasted on both sides to the equivalent of SSPC SP -10 (Near—White Metal Blast cleaning). Sand blasting and chemical pickling of steel sheets is not acceptable. 4.1.2 The surface anchor pattern shall be not less than 1.0 mil (0.001 inches). 4.1.3 These sheets shall be evenly oiled on both sides to protect them from corrosion during fabrication. 4.2 Sheet Edges 4.2.1 After initial sheet preparation, all full height vertical wall sheets and all rectangular shaped floor sheets shall be mechanically rounded. A metal coating of 316 stainless steel shall then be applied to these edges by an ARC thermal spray of 1.5 to 5 mils (0.0015 to 0.005 inches). The glass coating of the edges shall be similar to the flat panel surfaces. The process shall be applied to all four sheet edges, and shall be equal to EDGECOAT by Engineered Storage Products Company. Overs pray of lass side sheets and sealer applied to sheet edge is NOT considered e ual to EDGECOAT process. 4.3 Cleaning 4.3.1 After fabrication and prior to application of the coating system, all sheets shall be thoroughly cleaned by a caustic wash and hot rinse process followed immediately by hot air drying. 4.3.2 Inspection of the sheets shall be made for traces of foreign matter, soil particles, grease or rust. 4.4 VITRIUM PLUS coating Technology 4.4.1 All side wall sheets shall receive one coat of a catalytic nickel oxide glass pre -coat to both sides and then air dried. 4.4.2 A coat of milled glass shall be applied to the inside of the sheet and then air dried. This milled glass shall be formulated with titanium dioxide to produce a finished interior surface with optimal toughness and resistance to conditions normally found in potable water storage tanks. 4.4.3 A second cover coat of the titanium dioxide formulated milled glass shall be applied to the interior surface. The finished interior color shall be white and have a minimum glass thickness of 10 mills. 7 Part Number 267740 -000 ECN 04108 Rel. 1 4.4.4 A final cover coat of milled cobalt oxide enhanced (blue) glass shall be applied to the exterior of the sheet. 4.4.5 The sheets shall then be fired at a minimum temperature of 1590° F in strict accordance with the manufacturer's ISO 9001 quality control procedures, including firing time, furnace humidity, temperature control, etc. 4.4.6 The final exterior color shall be manufacturer's standard cobalt blue. 4.4.7 The dry film exterior coating thickness shall be 10.0 mils minimum. 4.5 Factory Inspection 4.5.1 The manufacturer's quality system shall be ISO 9001 certified. 4.5.2 Chemical Resistance of Glass Coatis 4.5.2.1 Every batch of component frits shall be individually tested in accordance with PEI Test T--21 (citric Acid at Room Temperature) . 4.5.3 Low Voltage Wet Sponge Holiday Test 4.5.3.1 The inside sheet surface shall be inspected using a low voltage wet sponge holiday tester in accordance with ASTM D5162 -91 Method A (Low Voltage Wet Sponge Testing). 4.5.3.2 The tester shall be used at a voltage of 67.5 volts (±10/0) and set so the alarm is sounded if the electrical resistance of the glass coating falls below 125,000 Q ( ±10 ). The tester shall have a valid calibration record. The testing solution used to wet the sponge shall contain a low sudsing wetting agent added at a ratio of not more than Y2 fluid oz . per gallon of water. 4.5.3.3 Frequency of the test shall be every sheet. Any sheet registering a discontinuity shall be rejected 4.5.3.4 All inside sheet surfaces shall be holiday free. 4.5.3.5 A 1000 volt dry test shall not be acceptable as this is not recommended by ASTM for coating thicknesses less than 20.0 mils (0.020 inches). 4.5.4 Measurement of Glass Thickness 4.5.4.1 Glass thickness shall be measured using an electronic dry film thickness gage (magnetic induction type) approved by Engineered Storage Products Company. The thickness gage shall have a valid calibration record. 4.5.4.2 All coated sheets shall be inspected for thickness. The thickness of the glass shall be between 10.0 and 16.0 mils (0.010 and 0.016 inches). 8 Part Number 267740 -000 ECN 04108 Rel. 1 4.5.5 Measurement of Color 4.5.5.1 The exterior color of the sheets shall be measured using a colorimeter approved by Engineered Storage Products Company. The colorimeter shall have a valid calibration record. 4.5.5.2 All coated sheets must be checked for color uniformity. The color must fall within the tolerance specified by Engineered Storage Products Company, else the panel shall be rejected. 4.5.5 Impact Adherence Test 4.5.6.1 The adherence of the glass coating to the steel shall be tested in accordance with ASTM B916 -01. Any sheet that has poor adherence shall be rejected. 4.5.6.2 Frequency of this test shall be one sheet per gage lot run minimum. 4.5.7 Fishscale Test 4.5.7.1 The glass coating shall be tested for fishscale by placing the full size production sheets in an oven at 409° F for one hour. The sheets will then be examined for signs of fishscale. Any sheet exhibiting fishscale shall be rejected and all sheets from that gage lot will be similarly tested. 4.5.7.2 Frequency of this test shall be one sheet per gage lot run minimum. 4.6 Packaging 4.6.1 All sheets that pass Factory Inspection and Quality Control checks shall be protected from damage prior to packing for shipment. 4.5.2 Heavy paper or plastic foam sheets shall be placed between each panel to eliminate sheet --to -sheet abrasion during shipment. 4.6.3 Individual stacks of panels will be wrapped in heavy nail plastic and steel banded to special wood pallets built to maintain the roll- radius of the tank panels and minimize contact or movement of finished panels during shipment. 4.6.4 Shipment from the factory will be by truck, hauling the tank components exclusively. 5 ERECTION 5.1 Foundation 5.1.1 The tank foundation is a part of this contract and shall be installed by the tank bidder. Part Number 267740 -000 ECN 04108 Rel. I 5.1.2 The tank foundation shall be designed by the manufacturer to safes sustain the structure and its live loads. 5.1.3 Tank footing design shall be based on the soil bearing capacity given in section 2.5.5 above as determined by geotechnical analysis performed by a licensed soils engineer. The cost of this investigation and analysis is not to be included in the bid price. copies of the soil report are to be provided to the bidder prior to bid date by the owner or Engineer. 5.1.4 Footing designs for soil bearing strengths less than that specified, and those designs deviating from tank manufacturers' standard shall be the responsibility of the owner and his Engineer based on tank live and dead loading data provided by the tank manufacturer. 5.2 Tank Floor options: (check one) 5.2.1 Glass Coated Bolted Steel 5.2.2 Bolted steel panels shall be either placed over a 3 inch compacted sand base contained by a steel or concrete ring wall or a non - extruding and resilient bituminous type filler meeting the requirements of ASTM D1751 if set on a concrete slab. 5.2.3 A plastic encapsulated nut shall be used to cover the bolt threads exposed on the inside of the floor. The plastic encapsulation shall be NSF compliant. 5.2.4 Leveling of the starter ring shall be required and the maximum differential elevation within the ring shall not exceed 113 inch, nor exceed 1115 inch within any 10 feet of length. 5.2.5 Concrete Floors 5.2.5.1 The floor design is of reinforced concrete with an embedded glass coated steel starter sheet per the manufacturer's design and in accordance with AWWA D103 latest edition, Sec 11.4, and is an ,integral element of the tank assembl ; therefore the tank foundation and floor slab (performed in two separate ours with embedded starter sheet shall be constructed bv the tank supplier usinq manufacturer trained p ersonnel regularly engaged in this type of tank construction. 5.2.5.2 Leveling of the starter ring shall be required and the maximum differential elevation within the ring shall not exceed 118 inch, nor exceed 1110 inch within any 10 feet of length. 5.2,5.3 A leveling plate assembly consisting of two anchor rods and a slotted plate shall be used to secure the starter ring, prior to encasement in concrete. Installation of the starter ring on concrete blocks or bricks, using shims for adjustment, is not permitted. 10 Part Number 267744 -000 ECN 04108 Rel. 1 5.2.5.4 Place one butyl rubber elastomer waterstop seal on the Inside surface of the starter ring below concrete floor line. Place one bentonite impregnated water seal below the butyl rubber seal. The materials shall be installed in accordance with tank manufacturer's instructions. 5.2.5.5 Only embedded starter ring desi n is accepted. Rebate base and flat base designs which do not include embedded base ring in concrete foundation are NOT acce ted. 5.3 Sidewall Structure 5.3.1 Field erection of the glass- coated, bolted -steel tank shall be in strict accordance with the procedures outlined in the manufacturer's erection manual, and performed by an authorized dealer of the tank manufacturer, regularly enqac led in erection of these tanks usin factor trained and certified erectors. 5.3.2 specialized erection jacks and building equipment developed and manufactured by the tank manufacturer shall be used to erect the tanks. 5.3.3 Particular care shall be taken in handling and bolting of the tank panels, structural members, and appurtenances to avoid abrasion of the coating system. Prior to a liquid test, all surface areas shall be visually inspected by the Engineer. 5.3.4 An electrical leak test shall be performed during erection using a wet sponge 9 volt leak detection device. All electrical leak points found on the inside surface shall be repaired in accordance with manufacturer's published touch up procedure. 5.3.5 No backfill shall be placed against the tank sidewall without prior written approval of the tank manufacturer. Any backfill allowed shall be placed according to the strict instructions of the tank manufacturer. 5.4 Roof 5.4.1 Tanks with diameters of 14 to 31 feet shall include a radially sectioned roof fabricated from glass - coated, bolted steel panels, as produced by the tank manufacturer, and shall be assembled in a similar manner as the sidewall panels utilizing the same sealant and bolting techniques, to assure a weather tight assembly. The roof shall be clear - span and self - supporting. Both live and dead loads shall be carried by the tank walls. The roof shall be of a rolled knuckle design, with no rolled angle connection between sidewall and roof panels. The manufacturer shall furnish a roof opening which shall be placed near the outside tank ladder and which shall be provided with a hinged cover and a hasp for locking. The opening shall have a clear dimension of at least 24 inches in one direction and 15 inches in the other direction. The opening shall have a curb at least 4 inches in Part Number 257740 -000 ECN 04108 Rel. 1 height, and the cover shall have a downward overlap of at least 2 inches, or a gasketed weather -tight cover in lieu of the 4 inch curb and 2 inch overlap. 5.4.2 Roofs for tanks greater than 31 feet in diameter shall be constructed of non - corrugated triangular aluminum panels which are sealed and firmly clamped in an interlocking manner to a fully triangulated aluminum space truss system of wide flange extrusions, thus forming a donne structure. 5.4.2.1 The dome shall be clear span and designed to be self-supporting from the periphery structure with primary horizontal thrust contained by an integral tension ring. 5.4.2.2 The dome and tank shall be designed to act as an integral unit. The tank shall be designed to support an aluminum dome roof including all specified live loads. 5.4.2.3 The donne manufacturer shall be the same as the lass- fused -to- steel tank system, The sole source responsibility of the tank, dome, foundation, installation, and service will greatly reduce owner's liability. 5.4.2.4 Materials: 5.4.2,4.1 Triangulated dome frame struts: AA6005A -T6 aluminum. 5.4.2.4.2 Structural frame node plates: 0.375 inch nominal thickness, AA6061 --T6 aluminum, 5.4.2.4.3 Triangular dome panels: 0.050 inch nominal thickness, AA3003 -H 16 aluminum Sheet. 5.4.2.4.4 Triangular skylight panels, (if specified): nominal thickness of 114 inch thick clear acrylic or polycarbonate. 5.4.2.4.5 Perimeter tension /compression ring: AA6005A -T6 aluminum, 5.4.2.4.6 Fasteners: AA2024 -T4 aluminum or austenitic series 300 stainless steel as required by the manufacturers design. 5.4.2.4.7 Sealant: Silicone, conforming to Federal Specification TT -S- 00230. 5.4.2.4.8 Gaskets: Silicone, conforming to Federal Specification ZZ -R -765, Class 2, Grade 50 or equal or Neoprene conforming to ASTM C509 -00. 5.4.2.4.9 Dormers, doors, and hatches: AA6061-T6, AA6005A -T6, AA5086 -H34 orAA5052 -H36 aluminum, 0.090" nominal thickness. 5.4.2.5 Supplier shall be Engineered Storage Products Company of DeKalb, 12 Part Number 267740 -000 ECN 04108 Re. 1 Illinois. 5.4.3 Roof Vent 5.4.3,1 A properly sized vent assembly in accordance with AWWA D103 shall be furnished and installed above the maximum water level of sufficient capacity so that at maximum design rate of water fill or withdrawal, the resulting interior pressure or vacuum will not exceed 0.5 inch water column. 5.4.3.2 The overflow pipe shall not be considered to be a tank vent. 5.4.3.3 The vent shall be constructed of aluminum such that the hood can be unbolted and used as a secondary roof access. 5.4.3.4 The vent shall be so designed in construction as to prevent the entrance of birds and/or animals by including an expanded aluminum screen ( inch) opening. An insect screen of 23 to 25 mesh polyester monofilament shall be provided and designed to open should the screen become plugged by ice formation. 5.5 Appurtenances (per AWWA D'I03, Section 5) 5.5.1 Pipe Connections 5.5,1.1 Where pipe connections are shown to pass through tank panels, they shall be field located, saw cut, (acetylene torch cutting or welding is not permitted), and utilize an interior and exterior flange assembly. Tank shell reinforcing shall comply with AWWA D103 latest edition. A single component urethane sealer shall be applied on any cut panel edges or bolt connections. 5.5,1.2 overflow piping shall be inches diameter schedule 80 PVC, seamless aluminum tubing, or FRP. 5.5.2 outside Tank Ladder 5.5.2.1 An outside tank ladder shall be furnished and installed as shown on the submittal drawings. 5.5.2.2 Ladders shall be fabricated of aluminum and utilize grooved, skid - resistant rungs. 5.5.2.3 Safety cage and step -off platforms shall be fabricated of galvanized steel. Ladders shall be equipped with a hinged lockable entry device. 5.5.3 Access Doors 5.5.3.1 One bottom access door shall be provided as shown on the submittal drawings in accordance with AWWA D103. 13 Part Number 267740 -000 ECN 04108 Rel. 1 5.5.3.2 The manhole opening shall be a minimum of 24 inches in diameter. The access door (shell manhole) and the tank shell reinforcing shall comply with AWWA D 103 latest edition, Sec. 5.1. 5.5.4 Identification Plate: A manufacturer's nameplate shall list the tank serial number, tank diameter and height, and maximum design capacity. The nameplate shall be affixed to the tank exterior sidewall at a location approximately 5 feet from grade elevation in a position of unobstructed view. 5.5.5 cathodic Protection 5.5.5.1 A passive cathodic protection system shall be designed and supplied by the tank manufacturer based upon information supplied by the Engineer or Owner, 6 FIELD TESTING 6.1 Hydrostatic 6.1.1 Following completion of erection and cleaning of the tank, the structure shall be tested for liquid tightness by filling tank to its overflow elevation. 6.1.2 Any leaks disclosed by this test shall be corrected by the authorized dealer in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. 6.1.3 Water required for testing shall be furnished by the Owner at the time of tank erection completion, and at no charge to the tank erector. Disposal of test water shall be the responsibility of the Owner. 6.1.4 Labor and equipment necessary for hydrostatic tank testing is to be included in the price of the tank. 7 DISINFECTION 7.1 Standards 7.1.1 The tank structure shall be disinfected at the time of testing by chlorination in accordance with AWWA Standard C652 -02 "Disinfection of Water Storage Facilities" as modified by the tank manufacturer. 7.1.2 Disinfection shall not take place until tank sealant is fully cured (see Sect. 3.5.3 above) . 7.1.3 Acceptable forms of chlorine for disinfection shall be: 7.1.3.1 Liquid chlorine as specified in AWWA 0652 -02. 7.1.3.2 Sodium hypochlorite as specified in AWWA C652 -02. 14 Part Number 267740 -000 ECN 04108 ReL 1 7.1.4 Acceptable methods of chlorination shall be: 7.1.4.1 Chlorination method 1 as outlined in AWWA 0652 -02 Section 4.3. 7.1.4.2 Chlorination method 2 as outlined in AWWA 0652 -02 Section 4.3. 7.1.4.3 Chlorination method 3 as outlined in AWWA 0652 -02 Section 4.3. 7.1.5 Acceptable application methods shall be: 7.1.5.1 Chemical feed pump. 7.1.5.2 Spraying, brushing, or painting of all water - contact surfaces. 8 TANK MANUFACTURER'S WARRANTY 8.1 The tank manufacturer shall include a warranty for the tank materials and coating. As a minimum, this warranty shall provide assurance against defects in material or workmanship for the period of 1 year and corrosion of the glass coated surface for the period of 5 years. 9 References 9.1 SSPC SP -10 - Surface Preparation Standard — Near -White Metal Blast Cleaning 9.2 ASTM 0633 -79 - Standard Test Method for Adhesion or Cohesive Strength of Flame - Sprayed Coatings 9.3 PEI Test T-21 - Test for Acid Resistance of Porcelain Enamels (Citric Acid Spot Test) 9.4 ASTM D5162 -91 - Standard Practice for Discontinuity (holiday) Testing of Nonconductive Protective Coating on Metallic Substrates 9.5 ASTM B916 -01 - Standard Test Method for Adherence of Porcelain Enamel Coatings to Sheet Metal 15 Part Number 267740 -000 ECN 04108 Rel. I .. d+ a; � .,� ■ �• ,`'ti �"� t A ' N er r F �� � 5j� � s'� - y . L �• a ° r q YE • yr' r'F r _ $ r , I. 1 4 rr � 1 5 • 4 t , y1 - a s 1 e q fl � r Ak n ti ' m )Ov VC NMCIHS S� -31YDS I ./\.Ll JOHinv iiivm 3116 NDH HOOD 1 N, 11 9 d I A N b 3 1 5 upr -nffi.& C'e 'ZD IED Cl ITTI m I=. In 0 4 5 w ru FL CU cu m cu -n I k i 11 il III I loill I - I'll Jr —w IE:l LU Ul LU Li LU z o 22 H INNINNININ! CD C3 _ IN I I in IN I I I I I I— I I 1 .1 oil ILI.—PI 1�1 I I -11-41 0 z, Ilk IV 19' T 0 LI; V rg r- w r— P crl. clu 4m, N 0 Ln W3 q % (D CP ftl L u m •7j ni rL N Lj 03: L . It JU 3VVd p W) HE S v 1yo5 —L-W' —61 :3-LVC] VM JOH'inv m - L I --I E3iS N9AVH HOOI v INA 1A W v C-1 m ep m CVJ. Me in ro fu N m T -r i.l. III Ill oil Ill Ill oil I o < N I- 0 Lw vh T- Li ffi UJ LU OL 0 0 R uj 19 CL I Lj z L J > ea 1 4 1 C. n Ln C3 vvmt-t mmm"IMN r. -,j -,.i-d'n ti C3 --T I Lj z L J > ea 1 4 1 C. n Ln C3 vvmt-t mmm"IMN r. -,j -,.i-d'n ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS OF 4968 NORTHRIDGE LANE Owner Name: Property Address: Owner Address: Tax Map Number: Current Zoning: Roanoke County School Board 68 10 Norths ide High School Road 5937 Cove Road, N.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24019 037-05-01-03.00-0000 R1S, R2CS Owner Name: Roanoke County School Board Property Address: 6810 Northside High School Road Owner Address: 5937 Cove Road, N.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Tax Map Number: 037.06-01-75.00-0000 Current Zoning: R1 S Northridge 5 Printed On 92134/1411 By GLENN FELDMANN p 2U Prepared By: Glenn Feldmann Darby & Goodlatte 210 l" Street, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Exemption claimed: Grantor and Grantee are exempted from recordation taxes and fees pursuant to §58.1-811A(3), C(4) and C(5), Cade of Virginia. Tax Map No.: See Attached Exhibit A THIS DEED, dated this $ day of Aarc.A 2005, by and between the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia ( "Grantor"), and the NVESTERN VIRGINIA WATER AUTHORITY, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, ( "Grantee"), WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at its meeting on June 22, 2004, duly authorized the conveyance to the Western Virginia Water Authority of certain lands, effective as of June 30, 2004, NOW, THEREFORE, FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor does hereby GRANT AND CONVEY to Grantee, with special warranty, all of those certain tracts, parcels or lots of land together with any improvements thereon, rights incident thereto, and appurtenances thereunto belonging, being in the County of Roanoke, Virginia, and being more particularly described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein. This conveyance is expressly made subject to any and all .recorded conditions, reservations, easements and restrictions affecting title to the property herein conveyed. Northridge 6 Printed On 12/30/2011 By GLENN FELDMANN r f S►i I t t Grantor reserves the right to construct and operate facilities and programs at Spring Hollow Reservoir as identified in the Recreation Master Plan for Spring Hollow Reservoir and approved by Grantor on December 3 1996. All construction shall be coordinated through Grantee. The Grantor further grants and conveys with Special NVarranty all water and sanitary sewer easements vnd rights of way of record to the Grantee. This conveyance is made subject to easements, conditions and restrictions of record insofar as they may lawfully affect the property. This instrument is executed by a duly authorized administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, to signify agreement by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, to convey the herein described parcels and easements pursuant to Ordinance No. 0(220413 , adopted by said Board of Supervisors on the Z2 day of JLLKe -. , 2ooj4 WITNESS the following signatures and seals: COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA ATTEST; By Diane S. Childers, Clerk Elmer C, Hodge, County Administrator Printed On 97/30 /2071 By GLENN FELDMANN 7 I•_ k l u ; L COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGFNIA § § To -wit: COUNTY OF ROANOKE § The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thi N � I (. g s Q day of 1"a , 2005, by Elmer C. Hodge, County Adm inistra to r, on behalf of the County of Roanoke, Virginia. Notary Public My commission exp ires: r2 1 0200 7 Approved as to Form: County Attorney Printed an 12130 /2011 GLENN FELDMANN l i - y1 c t ncz qt '�4 +l Exhibit A Property in the County of Roanoke Location Address Tax Flap Algoma Tank 3546 Londonderry 87.10 -02 -03 APCO 1850 Loch Haven Dr. 36.01 - 01 - 17.01 Arlington Hills 4 Arlington Hills 86.16 -04 -35 Belle Haven Tank 3200 Loch Haven Rd. 26.07 -01 -04 Belle Meade 3927 Belle Meade Dr. 87.05 -04 -10 Big Hill Booster 4830 Vest Main. St. 64.02 -02- 10.01 Blackwood Booster 1450 Blackwood Dr. 56.03 -02 -22.01 Botetourt East #2 5113 Mcintosh Lane 40.09 - 05.06 Branderwood 4562 Sammerset Dr. 97.07 -02 -69 Bridlewood 5907 Blackhorse Ln. 86.15 -03 -65 Bridlewood #1, 2, 3 5613 Bridlewood Dr. 86.15 -03 -02.01 Bridlewood #1, 2, 3 5611 Bridlewood Dr. 86.15 - 03 - 01 Brookfield Sewer Lift 2901 Jae Valley Rd. 79.01 -03 -26.02 Brookwood #1 & 2 5671 Roselawn Rd. 86.03 -03 -04 Brookwood #3 6599 Woodbrook Dr. 86.03 -03 -16 Buck Mountain Pump /PRV 4050 Buck Mountain 97.08 -01-42 Buckland Mills Sewer Lift 8545 Barrens Rd. 26.08 -06 -11.01 Campbell Hills #2 7001 Campbell Dr. 63.03 -01 -04.01 Campbell Hills Booster 6626 Campbell Dr. 72.02 -01 -45.01 Campbell Hills Sewer Lift 0 West Main St 72.02 -01 -45.02 Canterbury Tank 5820 Old Locke Ct, 76.19 - 05 - 04 Carolyn Heights 6020 Cartwright Dr. 87.17 -06 - Carriage Hills Booster 7405 Carriage Hills Dr. 94.02 - 04 - 17 Carriage Hills Tank 7595 Boxwood Dr. 94,02- 01 -26 -01 Carson Rd. Well 4000 Carson Rd. 50.01 -01 -05.04 Canrins Meadow 7426 Indian Rd. 27.10 -07 -22 Castle Rock 91 5460A Linda Ln. 76.19 -03 -09 Prated On 12/30/2011 By GLENN FELDMAf1 N Location Address Tax Map Castle Rock #2 & 2A 5180 Burnham Rd. 76.03 -03 -70.01 Castle Rock #3 5225 Cage Spring Ln. 76.20 -05 -08 Castle Rock Tanks 6030 Bumham Rd. 76.03 -03 -70.02 Cherokee Hills #2 5365 Cherokee Hills 54.04 -06 -37 Cherokee Hills #4 4816 Cherokee Hills 54.04 -04 -63 Cherokee Hills Tank 5417 Scout Cir. 54.04 -06-41 Chesterfield Court 5423 Downing St. 87.11 -02 -22 Cotton Hills Sewer Litt 5801 Chagall Cr. 96,07 -02-12.01 Cresthill 4545 Cordell Dr. 76.12 -08 -25 Crumpacker Tank 0 Crumpacker Drive 40,05 -01 -31 Deer Run 941 Starmount Ave. 27.09 -01 -17 Delaney Court 3161 Huffman Ln. 80.01 -02 -09 Dwight Hills 0 Vivian Avenue 27,13 -06 -07 Farmingdale 5815 Lakemont Dr, 67,14 -01 -20 Forest Edge. #3 7769 Forest Edge Dr. 95.01 -03 -26 Forest Edge #5 0 Cedar Edge Road 95.01 -03 -38 Forest Edge #6 7745 Bent Mountain 95.01 -01 -34.06 Fort Lewis Seger Lift 0 Shawnee Dr. 55.02 -02 -11 Four Sixty Tank 0 Crumpacker Dr. 39.00 -01 - 01.0 1 Friendship Lane 7933 Carvin St 27.06 -01.01 Glenvar #2 387A lvie Cir. 54.02 -02 -22 Glenvar 43 477A Dot Cir. 54.02 - 0246 Glenvar Raw Mater Pump 4581 Mayfair Dr. 65,00 -02 -55 Green Hill #1 2916 Green Hill Dr, 55.04 -01 -40 Green Hill #2 3011 Green Hill Dr. 55.04 -01 -67 Green Hill PRV 3092 Green Hill Dr, 55.04 -01 -57 Grisso 5232 Squires Ct. 86.11 -01-Da Hampden Hills #1 & Tanks 1445 Lori Dr. 79.03 -02 -27 Hampden Hills #2 3016 "loodway Rd. 79.01 -01 -33 Hidden Valley #2 & Tank 5602 Sugar Loaf Mtn. 76.01 -01 -27 Printed On 12/3012011 By GLENN FELDMANN Location Address Tax flap Hidden Valley #7 4803 Walton Ln. 67.13 -02 -10 Hidden Valley #8 6420 Hidden Moods 66.04 -03 -03 Hidden Malley #9 6428 Fairway View Tr, 66.04 -01 -38 Hidden Woods Tank 6808 Hidden foods 66.04 -6 -12 Highfields 5413 Highfields Dr. 86.11 -04.06 Hillendale Well (In City of Roanoke) Ben St. NW 06420101 Homewood #3 6531 Old Farm Rd. 76.03 -06 -11 Homewood Booster 6097 Steeplechase. Dr. 86.01 -02 -11 Hunt Ridge 4635 Hunt Ridge Rd. 44.14 -1 -50 Hunt Ridge Booster 5510 Hunt Ridge Road 40.01- 01 -01 -01 Hunting Hills Booster 5557 Hunting Hills Dr, 87.07 -01 -13 LaBellevue #1 2040 Wesvan Dr. 39.04 -01 -46 LaBellevue #3/Coachman Booster and 2509 Coachman Cir. 39.02 -03 -28 LaBellevue #6 2287 Donagale Dr. 39.12 -02 -50 LaBellevue #7 1999 Springfield Dr. 39.04 -01 -38.01 LaBellevue Drive Tank 2170 Labellevue Dr. 39.04 -01 -07 Layman Lawn 4506E Rosecrest Rd, 86.11 -03 -08 Loch Haven Tank 4968 Northridge Ln. 37.06 -01 -76 Long Ridge Booster 5705 Long Ridge Cir. 75.09 -01 -17 Martin Creek #14 7524 Femway Dr. 94.02 -03 -08 Martin Creek #3 & 4 (Vest) 7826 Five Oaks Rd, 95.01 -01 -46 Martin Creek (end of road) 7460 Carriage Hills Dr. 94.02 -04 -07 Martin Creek #12 7461 Carriage Hills Dr. 94,02 -01 -31.01 Martin Creek (Parker) 7205 Carriage Hills Dr. 94,02 -02 -21,10 Merriman Road Seiner Lift 6008 Merdrnan Rd. 087,17 -05 -06 Mount Vernon Forest 5405 Chatsworth Dr. 86.15 -01 -43 Mountain View 6618A Bryant Cir, 28.13 -01 -39 fungar Tank Site 0 Starkey Rd. 97.01 -01 -05.03 North Lakes #3 5519 North Lakes Dr. 36,12 -01 -23 North Lakes #4 5327 Green Tree Ln. 37.09 -08 -03 Printed On 12/30/2011 By GLENN FELDMANN Location Address Tax Map North Lakes #4 Baaster &Tank 5325 Green Tree Ln, 37.09 -08 -02 North Lakes #5 3290 Green Ridge Rd, 36.12 -03 -01.01 North Lakes #5 5200 Spring Ln 37.09 -01 -52 North Lakes Booster 4990 Craun Ln 37.14 -01 -14 Nover Well 1129 Nover Ave. 27.13 -02 -14 Oak Grove Tank 4530 Glen Heather Dr. 76.07-02-19 Ogden Booster /Front lot 0 Electric Road 77.20 -03 -01.01 Oriole Lane Tank 6074 Oriole Ln. 87.17- -03 -13 Penguin Tank 3649 Kenwick Tr. 87.09 -06 -07 Pines 4510 Glen Heather Dr. 75.07 -02 -53 Ponderosa Park 5957 Barbara Cir. 86,20 -01 -08 Ponderosa Park Tank 5965 Ponderosa Cir. 85.20 -01 -33 Scenic Hills 5730 Scenic Hills Dr. 86.19 -01 -11 Shadweli Booster 5791 Hollins Rd. 28.13 -02 -03,03 Shadwell Tank 8272 Olde Tavern Rd. 28,00.01 -05.01 Smokey Ridge 6250 Smokey Ridge 76,03 -03 -74 Southern Hills 4342 Elm View Rd. 87,0845 -03 Spring Hollow Reservoir 6498 Dry Hollow Rd. 72.00 -01 -01 Starkey #1 5587 Crystal Creek Dr, 97.01 -02 -06 Starkey #2 5612 Crystal Creek Dr, 97.05 -01 -28 Summit Ridge Horizontal Tank 2685 Summit Ridge 039.00 -01 -09 SUncrest Heights Sewer Treatment Plant 5827 Kathryn Dr. 98.02 -01 -89 SUncrest Tank 106 Hill Top Road 98,02 -01 -11.01 SUncrest Well 6415 SUncrest Drive 98.02 -41 -5101 The Groves Sewer Lift 0 Monet Dr. 095.07 - 99--01 FWate and Game Tank 5084 Upland Game Road Rd. 88.17 -01 -02 Treatment Facility 5200 West Main St. 72.02 -02 -03.01 Waterfall Lake Reservoir 0 Waterfall Dr. 28.05- 02 -•25 Wooded Acres PRV 1809 Red Lane Ext. 35.04 -02 -08 Wyndale 4557 Wyndale Av. 76.47 -01 -08 Printed On 1WO12011 B GLENN FELDMANN . j -� 1, j am . 29 I - } 1 � 2 a. - rl�- t v AR b INSTRUMENT #200504631 RECORDED IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE OF ROANOKE COUNTY 014 MARCH 29� 2005 AT 04:03PM 33TEVEN A. 11CGRAWa CLERK RECORDED BY: FRS e A t a�ipp �a , W64 >r = . ............. .. Mot . 4m sic w o w d 11111 Ij 47 Y. o. .............. tz g" *S1 40. Na 45- Z-�N ........ . . . 'It i JJPW&Wi I I q . . . . . . . ... 4K tea cy" tA 11 is w#-,Oi -.LM%MRM - 4NVJ F �� J , 11'4 fa CL 2! rL ;b a�ipp �a 1 M 4-r d) U? 0 CL o L- LL - C:) m m L M cp TM tip CL U) 0 ae ui M r-11 -A-1% eloYgl K-f-W 0-11,12 - S., co; W" 1-irow ol I 1 - 7 L or" W7 M MOPS F r--, em LJ PLO. LE III All�!N 00 oy pv- 7 �� 7, - -�. ` o - ' e • 4 1 Ar n• a4 � �- � , y �'" _ � .'p fi t'�$ I� g�,i+�X, M y � , 8 X . F� e '� ^� u _ •��� i 4 ��ro'"y� ,Ji y `� e s�'9W'' '" w " ,� A st a JM ... �,s.'a �. '' y. ,..,� r' JA 2 19h SZ7.wwsw j Y�� �Y ��, y '' r -:.ice ll � w � A #.a � �jl �Y e rr lei Y J I I - i I s no L vi si b le, from Seq doi a Dr iv e. p n q, u ".: w l !' y ! `V • F ° ,... U 9 U jtl • ��. Vii.:'_ ,p ° I : �i �; i.. .' _ " 1 Frtrt r A 'p , p+. r , i r P p p 1 " d °. • •� � .' .� � � P F _�- 1 , a _ i� � .g w s _ ® Ilk � j i a 'ill y I [ ,I i p a. s p ' I I - i I s no L vi si b le, from Seq doi a Dr iv e. p r � _ 11 yoh 3, J� R R � 4 i, f ! A I Y � r 6� II Idw �J Pt a g, lu Roanoke County Department of Community Development Applicants Name: N Existing Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Tax Map Number: Magisterial District: Western Virginia water Authority R1 R1S 037.06 -01 -76.00 -0000 Catawba Area: 0.51 Acres 10 January, 2012 Scale: 1 " = 100' R3 R4 RB GB CB M1 M2 Roanoke Count Department of Communit Development Applicants Name: Existin Zonin Proposed Zonin Tax Map Number: Ma District: Western Vir water Authorit Ri Ris 037.06-01-76.00-0000 Catawba Area: 0.51 Acres 10 Januar 2012 Scale: 1 100' Rural Preserve - Conservation Transition Co re Economic Opportunity - Pricipal Industrial Un iversity Roanoke County Department of Community Development Applicants Name: N Existing Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Tax Map Number: Magisterial District: Western Virginia water Authority R1 R1S 037.06 -01 -76.00 -0000 Catawba Area: 0.51 Acres 10 January, 2012 Scale: 1 " = 100' sir.°_- ,.• J ti F .•�Iy I EAEV M ,� J �+�:._ ? Y II r i e f � v+ ._ s AKI f x LM ,w ry cn in W U U Q O N Ile L co 0 Z L c O C J cn X W O N I .-10t•.. � + Y II r i LM ,w ry cn in W U U Q O N Ile L co 0 Z L c O C J cn X W O N I I ,w r �f '11 if I ONO ��., , !'a.�7�}! '1:� "��!�► 'i �4 T � ..� �� fi t. d ,`. _- _I�tiI �._ .� .r. .W�.- 'SAa i�J'�. ."'T' • ,Stl�.r��lnt ���ri`Sa' �Y�' I � mix I I 06 ie 1 A CU A IT 77 cu cr LU v4 NOW it t MIN 4 Ag AN OAF wo Affi IF 04 hw PA,4d/ AS QW, ASM IT j �, `fir �'��i- � ., y,i' ., I loins—, Ll c f ell � Y..► a ,, r \"• - \. "�A )� 1 ,. ... • A\ �� �.. wi'k f ''i �. �. •. �' � ruF ° T' ` } � � f l ^ 1 . ,, °- y - e ° r Aw l WNW • L ,'.N` 'ti 'F''M `�"" ti ? \"'ar'�1�.: °]If' - - , ►' P'�'y'9 -J , } } y,•{ Jft° r 0 ..`�'y ►ear,, yY^ . ..° t F N O 1� �. , , �.h art' ♦ ~ 'i. � ._.,. a ��,1 gay, Z, � r , - �. �r:."" /_.�. . �'Vfle�y '� Lb � .,,,. '_� � • 9 �11t :' • v I � ' . F. , { a. '� j ,_`� ' Fr r l /'r / w llct �a - y ri . rr - Jili,`IW. jlv � \ +. yew,. • �+.�a�. , ._ A%i.aA, `' -# y < a. ' \. r • / a ". y �,. �� - �♦'al��.+� � ��`�Yt+r ++I,h...iM'ilr - :�,' / +'�wi''Y "rte •1 � ' , r 1 � , ` ... Is' `�`A -.I''� A7 F 1 • " " • .�►;L * , ', �a III - + r ' • r• ` ,, ,r � � r �� ��'�' ' - }- ,. •� .: ws�.;r , � - ��!�'° n *"A'�aNl'�,ae� alp � - , .- [ ! .f','S �/ . . - � - ` -•''�� ' -� - �/� �' �tir °4c"`•i►•"�4I,l��.. ,. � �"` � �+ r r • f 1 '.. ,. -v, ! _ i T Y Z A N .�� ` i+dl °� •a . f 1' s ^ f A ►w �� 64 ,, � ��L � ,. ` � 1.. `a- � '` • �", ♦ � a'!'. �. �� ' 1 , I � �. I r,' f � � r r f ` ; `r } a -.. • -'� `' ., t \�j�'R' �. -� - -- �� � r 4' ��. • �i�. -� , • � - .� � R • � et Ru is Z\ - ..,:+"„♦ •_ �, ' mow«,,,.• _ _ ��.. a' ~ •aiw � `•ar �'a''� �`�'��'` _ L- "L _ _ ,. _ �' , .. �:Y �,,� � • � r'`f.' �L - r i , ,��', �,t .'•J''+'Y�'' � f P, a�rs�'�I'Y, 77 ' h < - 'R' s f�� r �• ;� �'_, •' '.. - \ R � ♦ '' ' A \1 "f�'i. tiw. \� • r ,1 ° Y '� f k ^ 4 r• r, , �' ,. \ ;F a e°' \` -* ;►;� j- _ "•�� �"'^ ' 1 ` �1w�'T ' �, *. � 1 , - P' ,. • `� ` ` °` ►• , - �ryR4�}'w k ,. 4 Y-a _ ,� 'a'•, - A �•. ;a Y r - ` a a ^� r.. +r .. ! • ♦ °,, q , L +. y,dy A'� `a + 'I �-- \! � � ill,' '°� � + 'r'�,f� c.'". , -.•. i, - � .� t,,lA� - 1 �. s - +��� 1a � Li �''�`, -� ��NJL2�:V �,�'• wt ! e � � !' F� r k_- 04 h Ot -..w � �* , s i y am � r � � i♦ to ,� � yv!iI �.w.!�► ii' ,; �.. ♦ -` _,�,rl���,'+l►1 � • .�lr�j� `,rr4•i , � r ' + 1 L r ' ' r �`' � � � ~'-�� .• 5 +v Rix► ti, 4,. ! ► ` �,.•�'i���. �l.t ;'rt�,�i'� ti�� wri `. ` > � _.., ° r• /. ' � ` z �' • 1 ; }d �� �. J � � _ „1 _r71 `x + . ° - .t4/A'M• � 'Y', f..rrr -.`.. '1,` +`a,•'e yllh�w� 1. �. r i � l •, ` -r 1 s L � V _�, • R s r s t - �. •� �• �`` a ` w ilt, ;� � ;� �► !I+�f �"`+Fj�,�,��•►` ='71. 'rr' _ `�.,. ,�Y'- �'a'�' r w � , ,,«f.. rr... . `: 'Alw� - ' - "R�w'''+I•' - �5}r ''� +w� \ •'yF'�Wi` ry,_ 1 .1 :4i i 4 �' 1�, '. �i. Ilti - "�' � ,.fir + �� - ��t��.��1• du "TT " �.. _ :, Y'l r _ 1 . - . - '/.. i J l a Y .+ sN -• I}� 4t Y ♦'4"3w- ;'''` .+r0 �r ♦ - ° +\`�' 1� .� . k�`.'` aw'S.' i ♦ / ,'w. �- ti �`. _i, r+ ' t+ � Y� / • ��`eiw� �', T � .t • .- s ® .1�, 'sy { � r c ,a F .. ... I� + 11, ^ � � .; • !! , � � 4 . � z a � - - F- 4v • t,. .� ,.' � � .. - } ~� \ •� _:,..s r . �[� �r - . l�' '• �.5. �`a�T,�`,i a,_.� -{��' ���,�'�� � '-'+A� � � • +.� ':3r.'4'MM -,-�, 7 r, -"r, , '�a� -� ° -•- .1 -. � ;, Y + � - .+ - � i, r: 1 - _ ', _ ` s, � .. N .. , i � L ,d ♦ I , t t ie � !.Y ww� 4 14 > Ras I T, t•r `f .. f mo w,' a �+ , • .� . "• 1 - - l . S� iA iw t� �� '♦ o'♦'i''a�L a'rM i- aw ”; ;Z w a t ♦ + �, , ` r 1 Y * < rl ` : ±� - :.; ' Y % t � ' Ilk �' '�'" . //} °+ t\ _ - i ���, - °�`�- _"'°•1►%`ar+"�.''�'.. fF . _ •- x +.'.'a - b y' „ s r L -,ru - ." _' Iii All-A ..�� ; � � _• \. �� + �f1"�'F!�:. ��° 1 l. '.' �f , _ y - • . l. _ ��" � ., +a- ' , ��r ' ` r} 'r� - . h r. }._ �f y a'S6 J'. •..- . " - " ' t •. .+w �i ! y+l is ♦ 11 � 1 � r• � � ' °,� ' ._ -. - - • .. .' rr i. r - :,{ t }�P� i- _ �:- ' i � e„ .. _. � tir r •• yam" _ ,aa .tv-iAr.. L l w, � r � ` .� • C wt - - ..�"�`�,' _ - - , -- 4 ' is . \ L y'�w o �' l� �� *• 1 r } �''t�Y4���'rr" ' 'sa •rrs� - M . F 1:•` •."^, - - �E •rt,?tl /r , 'i ' ' o r Al y i'�T'• `` }, i '� • a , � � t . . � R _. >t S `, � � 1 ',- �, . _ t ' �'.'� Vi i. � 1 • '�' s v } r .. ?','7 � � ' 6 <" °'. �,-„ ` i r - .l'�'� i I`.. _ 4 a ` .� g - • '.,'1. ' �(Y. met , r }YV ti • _ 1 �! r.•_ _ r `�'�'_•� . �r {' "1m /i,Tirt -. ° _ _ ( t. , - _ ` b ✓'r l a. '. T ` .� .. A LAB At cr IF , _ i , � ;; � .- -'� _ , s}, <,y.!r~4r �.:.� •r `�',?'�4r.�P, r_ si4 ^'_ t r ., +a� -` R . • 1� , � , • Y •1� ) '''4 �'� * . °�'!, � y �,�' s a,€ r_ ` - - atd _ ., +� ,� :�'. _ _ - e -.. - .-,mow t 1 ♦ - - O \ ` . r =f • "� �. _ - " - x.'• .. - t L, �•!�� t► �.N �► _ •�� • - i - . .. w J 4 o f ; Y ,4 ' I ; �..�IiY l _ •s' t � • J� �- � rr t a ° '.o,i a _ _ rt• � � �,�•� i - - ,r• " a �'P ry r � � •� • '�,Y '4 _s� - t - • y t ; - , ♦-F�. `yyra��ar :r `� "' ' t "� � • � I � ; CY "` /y +,1 .� z,_. 4 . s . 1 C;_, -r�� _ _ '� �` r " .I� r j... Y,:: - `ems• _ r F ,�y , • i b' ! W. N -' '� r , a �agkz ` � F _ 'a '3'�•.• �.. .±s i ♦ti a. .� 1,. . } F- I 'l l - ± E ft - M . N. r �i wry -•' - ��'•'�.� � Vi ~ • re w L '• � �Y �.ti r �1 .t� •� G ✓f, 4 `" � +r `'F•^ f- �• - +�'4': 1 _ �_ -s _ ;'�� x ,,.w ' r ;•• _ �."a' v 'T '.. ' y k• - •.''�'L," - .r . t �.E +t ,:. l - -�.+' ...�'�' -�-- - ' #,• "ice ' •+i..; _ _ ' - Y v o 4 :!" { . r ' L ') t } - •' ! w �' • ...fir '.. ,mss - �` •, a 5. ,f 5 .•�•, k° a e, - . . _toi �.a _ L aLV ° n PI - �Q a. •, l„L IOW IMP. .. ,- n • ,• :'. �_i. 'Y� 1 ,Z ,- �' i` y + y '�° - - °- _. .,-r.✓ +F * t r. ,qr- x ... .. `' f '' \ l r 7kf • rr �'�! ` a i. Y - ' t • { Ir a � � y, +�,'_ 1 1� r •,�' ix�° .R_. # .��y��w �����_ ��F° t i I• �t. i. ' � +� � "� \ � c s Y 4 +��\ �r!�i . - 'S , �� � " - „,asr. r ,.. .. - •'',ra- +. 'e -- ll4 ” ' ,. .... i S a k � \,�Y >� f • ; �A I � sw'.. \. i,. � _ j r •.� r I •' M ORAL � 7 " .e.rr 'i11� •1 +.•. •,"`,.• +,/� j e; •5. a' y , ;`I - ,+ " . I "'p,` +. \ 4' f \ / ° ' a19i • • w.y♦,, • , 4 z• �,. r. y L i '� °� 1 r .� �: t */ { i t ; r i. Ali �`► - _ 4•i ��` °dr ` s � - ' 7 "• , `.�, a r � '� •I '',:,�. r� , i* � ° • ti' . f'� `� �r , �' 71 �f _ �' �'. �+ t . •r �► 1 aV \ r ,i 4 r � a L� � � t ` ' �. - • r, i - ` i, ■�' .r +�Tis y - a l �w- a '-I��i. ,rlyiA94, •'���•� 4�'y.?Y �' : f , � �.. + t- -`, a Y _ r� � � ,,,. - ",s � +ter � � . - '�C.r �r.+,�:.. �' =" 1' =•� ;a'.,:. - . �_�" .. ' 4 r i i S tia F ' � 'l • � ly '' � • l„`yra' /�>✓ }Za�i - .s>- .1' rrre:,��. 3 � _ �'", , . , _ •„ i ,♦ a•w' - _s •:o , -� �., - _ ,. - N t \ + vw' ` ry v / • ' `, .. '1 ��� �s.�� "� rte' 3 r ^ f�. �;W 1` ;1�, *fit - ��r- _�'.�aN• �_ - 6, y isY t ■ 1 r �� ��', ae,.w �E /s�Y•+<1S" �I� ..�'�-: � - �� ��" .+„•,� M : � I ; ° ,` 1 ' a `,° t ,� ', ,T '' •. ' � \ � 71 1 .; :y - .• °,�,., '�'`.'�Y .. ,i"�,�..�. ,.` ° _ ... - �.`r w 1 (1 •� " q kt " i tr 'r r � ; �'„ .,' 11 '•, r `��, T I �� r�FL4 irai �?� • r# n° ,n ° ' r t , !°7� • 1 !y, S 4 ( * , ; 4. I. % .. „ 7 A te III , .Rrv�, * �• rmri. f L r .,: .+ ffii� J ', .• ..: '± . _ra '� '' I •- '4. ° a ,;, Sr - , '. j '!a'1, } � 1 r % htlr v � � ��r� d � p��..♦ � '• -. • � +-.. �. ra -° {r r .P 9'.`I. .� I s I�,i 1 0 A '4 l i /�.�r" /' p 1 ���;�� �r� , � ' .t �, - • _ TI ...`,:}I` - r � ... .,.I ..'r c � • � z i i. �rl �' � <I , y`: , *. �,. 3 Y ' ` � {! � �� tlYRti`.. �� r'f \' "� ' t�t�I / /.s"51�v�i° rr t � -i' •�r"I�.._ .z."'r i °. , ,�y ,,, - r tY ,� r � t t Y y �' �� � �l �y 4, ` i ,} c � � i 5 '� ,,, \"�.: ti�, \ +. i � �•, ✓. l����� •��� � � Y -- s' i .,. I I 4 � a� +' ! `1 � � /' • - Y � a 1 ; �, � `, ` L r �'Y' i' S i y� ,' i A —a r _ •- R ° - !'' Y r z I w I 'S!1 � � • ' a \ •+ �, � �� \1�� 7 ' • ! +. r d� , f 1 °. !� .r , �1� y4 ,,_ ` .. ,.. _ , t.. A- .S ,I w ,�" ...,kr 4,� 1- � f° `. ` '!^ ° 1 ! x / 1 b • /'.���r � . , +a,�.- ,y. ' , r - ".in -, ^. l S '. • '°9; { .w � i `� I L 1, r, �►� �, � a- `,'. } • j • • 1f.1, • f r t � � i Y r + � l , � , , - til l ' _ r - y y � ...' /!r , 3�� ►a -'� .- �ti "�'R ` s. ,' �1 - _ ' , , p t y � '. r I �� y � - G x .-. .-3.._ - I , ,,f r •,d, ♦. • r. 'j i ,IKUyM Y .J"•it - .!-+" Y� _ e+f '�. " k• Y , S a. - e weli� t - �Alrir R 1 4 t I .' op ',' �4• .,. , ;. �, .I?�i�., � •..�� r .^ No 41P 41P _. ;,'*r. .. � ,, 1 •,,Ri j , 1.' r' � a Y �, 4 � 1. !' \� r • � , 1� ` M " '�11 4 Ii ,st,,., h • a�/ . , - { - } + 1 ' ` • I •.i r ry 1''�''. -\\ li p ME IM R � ' ,• 'A. , a r I u y ' 4 r 1 A r 1,a .` .� % PI ° 1 r . rf>� ",. - +Y A � � , /a ��� y r M `i��J','� . 'd7 •� ,.;.' I A Y r" r "_. I, r i IY' ..� i ''`1 111FYr�� s• ir.� t= •' +a� i' , �� 1 f " • ,1 '1 f ,- . , ^. , , 1 ! } \ Y _ / .rr' r �4 •,ra w' .F K/+ ,Rr . • / - . ; ! M Y ` / I •a r ,.. l r ' V,�yf�.,'r f r r•♦ /ti► � �� ';�. � 4 f•I r •' r ',i►�frrr -� vA�." �. ±�! s.'.�1y1, `jy fSi� { _ d i' W f. •t • f a4.rN i,'.A Ir r 1 Y4 p r �1 Y/,Y1 CO CU 0 cn 4-1 LU oil Nil / N v MEMO ^ OF! �. ' 4�0� -&Big WE �4MAP. 4 41 "Ilk ir Idio Aw "40 nm;w MAMOR 41 t Alf-- KIZ : W40 4 A M 4 . A oTl O —j n. /I 6 It K, SEC. 30 -41. - R -1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30 -41 -1. - Purpose. (A) The R -1, low density residential district is established for areas of the county within the urban service area with existing low - middle density residential development, with an average density of from one (1) to three (3) units per acre, and land which appears appropriate for such development. These areas are generally consistent with the neighborhood conservation land use category as recommended in the comprehensive plan. In addition, where surrounding development and the level of public services warrant, these areas coincide with the development category recommended in the plan. This district is intended to provide the highest degree of protection from potentially incompatible uses and residential development of a significantly different density, size, or scale, in order to maintain the health, safety, appearance and overall quality of life of existing and future neighborhoods. In addition to single - family residences, only uses of a community nature which are generally deemed compatible are permitted in this district. This would include parks and playgrounds, schools and other similar neighborhood activities. (Ord. No. 042799 -11, § 1f., 4- 27 -99; Ord. No. 042208 -16, § 1, 4- 22 -08) Sec. 30 -41 -2. - Permitted uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk ( *) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Agricultural and Forestry Uses Stable, Private* 2. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment* Home Occupation, Type Manufactured Home * Manufactured Home, Emergency Multiple Dog Permit* Residential Human Care Facility Single - Family Dwelling, Detached (For Zero Lot Line Option - *) Single - Family Dwelling, Attached * Single - Family Dwelling, Attached and Detached (Cluster Subdivision Option - *) Temporary portable storage containers 3. Civic Uses Community Recreation Park and Ride Facility * Public Parks and Recreational Areas Utility Services, Minor 4. Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower Wind Energy System, Small* (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30 -19. An asterisk ( *) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment Alternative Discharging Sewage System Home Beauty /Barber Salon 2. Civic Uses Cemetery * Crisis Center Day Care Center Educational Facilities, Primary /Secondary Family Day Care Home Religious Assembly * Utility Services, Major 3. Commercial Uses Bed and Breakfast 4. Miscellaneous Uses Outdoor Gatherings (Ord. No. 42793 -20, § II, 4- 27 -93; Ord. No. 62293 -12, §§ 3, 8, 6- 22 -93; Ord. No. 82493 -8, § 2, 8- 24 -93; Ord. No. 62795 -10, 6- 27 -95; Ord. No. 042799 -11, § 2 4- 27 -99; Ord. No. 042500 -9, § II, 4- 25 -00; Ord. No. 072605 -7, § 1, 7- 26 -05; Ord. No. 042208 -16, § 1, 4 -22- 08; Ord. No. 052609 -22, § 1, 5- 26 -09; Ord. No. 030811 -1, § 1, 3 -8 -11) Sec. 30 -41 -3. - Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. (A) Minimum lot requirements. 1. All lots served by private well and sewage disposal systems: a. Area: 0.75 acre (32,670 square feet). b. Frontage: 90 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 2. Lots served by either public sewer or water: a. Area: 20,000 square feet. b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 3. All lots served by both public sewer and water: a. Area: 7,200 square feet. b. Frontage: 60 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. (B) Minimum setback requirements. 1. Front yard: a. Principal structures: 30 feet. b. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line. 2. Side yard: a. Principal structures: 10 feet. b. Accessory structures: 10 feet behind front building line or 3 feet behind rear building line. 3. Rear yard: a. Principal structures: 25 feet. b. Accessory structures: 3 feet. 4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. (C) Maximum height of structures. 1. Height limitations: a. Principal structures: 45 feet. b. Accessory structures: 15 feet, or 25 feet provided they comply with the setback requirements for principal structures. (D) Maximum coverage. 1. Building coverage: 30 percent of the total lot area for all buildings and 7 percent for accessory buildings. 2. Lot coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 62293 -12, § 10, 6- 22 -93; Ord. No. 42694 -12, § 8, 4- 26 -94; Ord. No. 042208 -16, § 1 4- 22 -08) Sec. 30- 83 -11. - Utility Services, Major. (A) General standards: 1. In considering an application for a special use permit, the planning commission and board of supervisors shall consider the justification for the location of the proposed utility service and any alternative locations which may be available. 2. The minimum lot size may be reduced as part of approval of the special use permit provided all setback and yard requirements are met and all other dimensional requirements are achieved. 3. The height limitation contained in each district may be increased as part of the approval of the special use permit, subject to any other height limitation contained in the section 30 -72 and 30 -73 of this ordinance. 4. No major utility service shall be located within one hundred (100) feet of an existing residence. 5. Except in the 1 -1 and 1 -2 districts, outdoor storage of materials and equipment, except during construction of the utility facility, shall be prohibited in association with a major utility service, unless specifically requested and approved as part of the special use permit. In the 1 -1 and 1 -2 districts outdoor storage areas shall comply with the screening provisions contained in section 30 -92 -4 (E). 6. Buildings and facilities shall be designed and constructed to be compatible with the surrounding area, so that these facilities or structures will not adversely affect nearby properties. 7. Except in the 1 -1 and 1 -2 districts, Type E screening and buffering consistent with section 30 -92 of this ordinance shall be required, unless specifically modified as a part of the approved special use permit. 8. All sewer and water utility services shall be publicly owned and operated by a government agency unless otherwise recommended by the director of the utility department and approved by the board of supervisors. 9. Sewer and water utility services shall be designed with a service area and capacity consistent with the purposes of the respective zoning district and the recommendations of the community plan. (Ord. No. 042799 -11, § 1f., 4- 27 -99) AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2012 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO THE WESTERN VIRGINIA WATER AUTHORITY FOR A MAJOR UTILITY SERVICE IN AN R -1, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, DISTRICT, THE MAJOR UTILITY SERVICE INVOLVES THE CONSTRUCTION OF A STANDPIPE WATER TANK APPROXIMATELY 102 FEET IN HEIGHT ON 0.51 ACRE, LOCATED AT 4968 NORTHRIDGE LANE (TAX MAP NUMBER 037.06 -01- 76.00- 0000), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Western Virginia Water Authority has filed a petition for a special use permit for a major utility service in an R -1, Low Density Residential, District, which involves the construction of a standpipe water tank approximately 102 feet in height on 0.51 acre, located at 4968 Northridge Lane (Tax Map Number 037.06 -01- 76.00 - 0000) Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 6, 2012; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on February 28, 2012; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on March 27, 2012. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to the Western Virginia Water Authority for a major utility service in an R -1, Low Density Residential, District which involves the construction of a standpipe water tank approximately 102 feet in height on 0.51 acre, located at 4968 Northridge Lane (Tax Map Number 037.06 -01- 76.00- 0000), Catawba Magisterial District, is substantially in Page 1 of 2 accord with the adopted 2005 Community Plan, as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2 -2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and that it shall have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood or community, and said special use permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: a) The site shall be developed in substantial conformity with the concept plan entitled "Western Virginia Water Authority Loch Haven Tank Site" dated December 23, 2011. b) The proposed water tank shall not exceed a height of 102 feet. c) Screening and buffering requirements for this site shall include the existing vegetation, modified to construct the proposed water tank, and the existing fencing. d) There shall be no sig nage on the water tank except for the manufacturer's or installer's identification and appropriate warning signs and placards. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The provisions of this special use permit are not severable. Invalidation of any word, phrase, clause, sentence or paragraph shall invalidate the remainder. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. Page of P -2 PETITIONER: WVWA Broadcast Tower CASE NUMBER: 9- 6/2012 Board of Supervisors Consent 1 St Reading Date: February 28, 2012 Planning Commission Hearing Date: March 6, 2012 Board of Supervisors Hearing & 2 nd Reading Date: March 27, 2012 A. REQUEST To obtain a Special Use Permit for a broadcasting tower approximately 120 feet in height in an AG -3, Agricultural /Rural Preserve, District on 0.121 acre, located at 2857 Summit Ridge Road (Tax Map Number 039.00 -01- 08.01- 0000), Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Five citizens spoke at the hearing. Roger Holnback, Ron Crawford, William Gordge, George Kegley, and Linda VanLuik all spoke in opposition of the petition. Their comments, concerns and questions included: the Read Mountain Alliance process; alternative sites need to be explored; the need to preserve this pristine mountain; can a few smaller towers cover this area; cost to the public if approved; precedent for additional towers locating on or near Read Mountain; and the possibility of co- locating on cell towers since cell phone coverage is good in the area. Two of the citizens who spoke also provided handouts to the Commission which included photographs. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Tara Pattisall presented the staff report. Sam Darby, legal counsel for the petitioner, discussed the site plan and reasons for obtaining this special use permit. Mr. Jarrell asked about the potential color and Mr. Darby replied that the WVWA is considering using weathered steel. Mr. Marrano asked if the WVWA didn't own this property where would it place its tower instead. Mr. Darby replied that this tower is part of a complex plan of antennas and one cannot be moved without altering all the other locations. Mr. Marrano asked if Coyner Mountain in Botetourt County had been considered as a potential location. Gary Robertson, of WVWA, replied that Coyner Mountain did not provide adequate coverage for the area. Mr. Marrano asked about the broadcast tower pre- submission meeting requirement. Ms. Pattisall replied that all pre- submission requirements had been met. Mr. Jarrell asked about the use of other towers in the area. Ms. Pattisall responded that the frequency of the WVWA towers are different from cellular towers and thus cannot be co- located together. Mr. Jarrell asked about the accuracy of the drawing Mr. Crawford provided. Ms. Pattisall stated that she could not speak to the scale of the drawing since she didn't draw it herself, but that it appeared to be inaccurate based on the height observed at the balloon test and also the size of the pole appeared to be much too large based on the provided specifications. Mr. Marrano asked about placing the antenna on the existing 15' water storage tank. Mr. Robertson responded that there would not be adequate transmission from that location. Mr. Marrano asked again about the Coyner Mountain location and Mr. Robertson responded with a letter from its contractor detailing the rejection of that location. D. CONDITIONS 1. The proposed development shall be in substantial conformance with the concept plan entitled "Western Virginia Water Authority Summit Ridge Site" dated December 23, 2011. 2. The proposed tower shall not exceed a total height of 120'. 3. No lighting shall be allowed on the broadcast tower unless required by the Federal Aviation Administration. 4. The width of the broadcasting tower at the top (120 feet) shall not exceed 6.5 inches in diameter. E. COMMISSION ACTION Mr. Jarrell made a motion to recommend approval of the petition with the three suggested conditions by staff plus a fourth condition limiting the width of the broadcasting tower at the top to 6.5 inches in diameter. The motion passed 5 -0. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: X Concept Plan X Vicinity Map X Staff Report X Other Philip Thompson, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission Page of Information received after Planning Commission Public Hearing on March 6 2012 • Email from David Anderson, Blue Ridge Parkway, dated March 9, 2012 • Letter from Roanoke Valley Preservation Foundation dated March 12, 2012 • Comments from Jane Brown dated March 14, 2012 Information distributed during Planning Commission Public Hearing on March 6. 2012 • Applicant's Remarks with Attachments • Information from Ron Crawford • Read Mountain Preserve Photographs from William Gordge • Comments on Application from Ron Crawford • Comments from Bev Long From: <J_ David _Anderson @ nps.gov> To: <Dawn_Godwin@nps.gov >, <pthompson@roanokecountyva.gov> Date: 3/9/2012 8:29 AM Subject: Re: Fw: WVWA Broadcast Tower Application - 1 Philip, Thank you for the opportunity to review this submission. It appears from the application that the tower will be approximately 2.65 miles from the Blue Ridge Parkway. The park does not feel that installation of the 120' monopole tower will have an adverse effect on the viewshed of the Blue Ridge Parkway if the tower remains unlighted. The tower should have both a landform and vegetative backdrop reducing its visibility by not being "skylined ". If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call myself or Dawn Godwin. Sincerely, David Anderson j_david_anderson @ nps.gov Resident Landscape Architect /GIS & GPS Coordinator National Park Service Blue Ridge Parkway 199 Hemphill Knob Road Asheville NC 28803 828 - 348 -3435 Dawn Godwin/BLRI/NPS To 03/07/2012 12:36 J David Anderson/BLRI/NPS@NPS PM EST cc Subject Fw: WVWA Broadcast Tower Application - 1 Dawn Godwin Community Planner Blue Ridge Parkway Asheville, NC 828.348.3434 - - - -- Forwarded by Dawn Godwin /BLRI/NPS on 03/07/2012 12:36 PM - - - -- "Philip Thompson" <pthompson@roanok ecountyva.gov> To <Dawn_Godwin@nps. gov> 03/07/2012 11:54 cc AM Subject WVWA Broadcast Tower Application - 1 First part of application attached. [attachment "WVWA Tower Application I.pdf' deleted by J David AndersonBLRI/NPS] March 12, 2012 ROANOKE VALLEY PItESERVATION FOUNDATION Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5204 Bernard Drive Fourth Floor Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Chair and Members of the Board of Supervisors, This correspondence is in regards to the special use permit application for a 120 foot broadcasting tower located at 2857 Summit Ridge Road (Tax Map No. 039.00 -01 -08.01 -0000) by the Western Virginia water Authority. The Roanoke Valley Preservation Foundation (RVIPIF) does not support this application. In 2009, the RVPF recognized the efforts of Ron Crawford and the Read Mountain Alliance for their stewardship of Read Mountain with a Preservation Award. To date the Alliance has protected approximately 320 acres of Read Mountain and is preparing to negotiate for an additional 100 acres. However, much of Read Mountain is still unprotected and vulnerable to insensitive development. By adoption of the 2005 Comprehensive Plan the Board of Supervisor's acknowledged the subject property and the surrounding area as having particular environmental sensitivity. According to the Comprehensive Plan, areas designated for conservation have `unique and important natural, agricultural, historical, and cultural resources that deserve to have the highest level of protection.' The report prepared by County staff even states that the proposed broadcasting tower does not strictly conform to the Conservation standards.' The approval of this application would set a precedent for similar applications in the future, compromising the work accomplished by the Alliance and security afforded to all areas designated by the County for Conservation. If this application is approved, however, the RVPF requests that the conditions proposed by staff be amended as follows. 1. Restrict the height of the tower to the minimum necessary to clear the tree canopy (suggested condition no. 2 would allow the tower to extend above the existing tree canopy by an excessive 45 f e et) ; 2. Camouflage the tower in a dark, neutral color such as brown; and 3. Limit the number of antennas to one. Thank you for your consideration of our comments. Sincerely, Alison S. Blanton, President Roanoke Valley Preservation Foundation P. O. Box 1366 Roanoke, VA Cc Roanoke County Department of Community Development 24007 The following form was submitted via your website: General Inquiry/Request for Service/Complaint Form Name:: Jane Address:: Brown City:: Roanoke State:: VA Zip:. Home Phone Number:: 5409771614 Daytime Phone Number:: Email Address:: awbrown @cox.net What Topic are you inquiring about ?: Other (specify below) Please Specify General Inquiry, Request for Service or Complaint: I live on Read Mountain with a view overlooking the Blue Ridge Parkway and downtown. From my house I probably will not notice that pole the water authority wants to put on Read Mountain. However, the Read Mountain Alliance has worked hard to keep our mountain tower free and I am proud that when people that live in the valley or are driving along 1--581 look toward Read Mountain's ridge line they see a mountain and not towers. Surely that is worth preserving when every other ridge line is already spoiled. We're not getting any new mountains, you know. Additional Information: Form submitted on: 3/14/2012 10:15:48 PM Submitted from IP Address: 98.163.19.53 Referrer Page: http:/l www. roanokecountyva .gov /index.aspx ?NID =288 Form Address: htt_ p:// www. roanokecountyya .aov /Forms.aspx ?FiD =64 ftle:HCADocuments and Settingslscarter\Local SettingslTemp\XPgrpwise14F61 CO98PO2_... 3/15/2012 T7) U TVIJ � S t o b a R oano ke March 6, 2012 7:00 p.m. Board of Supervisors Meetin Room Roanoke Count Administrative Buildin My name is S am Darby and I represent the western Virginia water .Authority tonight on two special use applications, [The Planning Commission members are Gene Marrano, Cave Spring, Jason Peters (Vice - Chair), Vinton, Crary Jarrell, Hollins, David Radford (Ch air), Windsor Dills and Martha Looker Catawba. Martha Hooker's district includes the north side stand pipe; Clary Jarrell's district includes the broadcast tower.] I have with me tonight Cary Rob erts on, Executive Director, water operations and Bob Benninger, Director, water Operations. 2857 Summit Ridge Road (Hollins) The water .Authority is in the process of switching out some 58,000 water meters to improve its efficiency, reduce water line loss and permit the electronic transmission of water usage data. It has contracted with Honeywell, a major utility company, for an approximate $30M upgrade, a critical portion of which involves the location of 10 communication antennas throughout the Roanoke valley. The water Authority will install high - energy water pumping systems at pump stations and treatment plants that reduce energy consumption. It expects to reduce its electricity use by nearly SM kilowatt hours annually and as a result reduce its carbon dioxide emissions by 8.8M pounds per year. This - would be the equivalent of removing more than 780 cars from the road per year. The placement of the antennas is quite 'Interesting from a technical point of view. The Honeywell subcontractor charged with installing the antennas has done 10 separate computer analyses known. as Propagation Studies. In addition to the accuracy of the wireless communication, the water .Authority will have much more up - to - date information on water usage, will be able to read meters a minimum of every 4 hours of the day and will be able to produce much more accurate and timely bills, In V addition, the water Authority will be able to monitor leakages and 'warn customers of water leakages much sooner than it is currently able to do. As you may know, the water Authority reads meters every 2 months and estimates usage in the intervening month, The Propagation Study began with 62 potential locations for antennas throughout the Roanoke valley and after eliminating, revisioning and reanalyzing has identified 10 locations which are shown on the attached handout. (Attachment 5.) The Broadcast Tower on Reed Mountain is much more essential to the efficiency of the overall propagation network. Attachment 6 is a Site Plan of the Broadcast Tower lot. Attachment 7 is a diagram of the Read Mountain Preserve. The Durham property is different from the Water Authority properties. Attachment 8 is the Concept Plan with an elevation. we have a little disagreement with the Read Mountain Alliance on the elevations. Attachments 5. Propagation Analysis (Antenna Locations) 6. Site Plan (Broadcast Tower) 7. Map of Read Mountain Preserve 8. Concept Plan (Broadcast Tower) (2 pages) L! b 1 , - � 1 4 I r V oa m r cu Q O ca tx ca a 0 n T � n . ._ 4-J 0 " Q IN cu m ' �, ► I� I - } 1 4V z If I a ADO � ..,�� LL cc CO I- /�� ✓ + 1 . w tl W ' �► t ba Il e rsq cz 1 l ., ` � -� ,� ,� ^ ' 1■ � ail' � r, '� � � � � _ t 1 O ' i M+ �, � � * fir/ ¢-S �r � ■ l �X �„ � � !■.. �'t n � ,� � � '.� � . `��- arm Le PIP 1 k � ai.■tl � • a Ih �;, ! L I r c �•• ;�, � f! � t V' , 9l | | ` v ' lE Cb LOCAnON OF PROPOSED Lo NO 316' 0423VV STORAGE TA14K -IN. ) 15-8" HE . TAX #039.01D-01 -08.01 -0000 ZONING AG3 ) 2857 SUMMIT PJDGE ROAD ' 56 "'W — / 7� Z5-00 2827 SUMMIT RIDGE ROAD ZONING Rl | / ~ 17 UM h MT R ~ ~~~ .. " --__ - -__ _- L=94.152, R=437-500 2837 SUMM17 RIDGE ROAD T X# CO39-02-03-1 O.DD-0000 ZONING Rl ` /6r 50" VVIDE 2851 SUMMIT RIDGE ROAD ZONING Rl 28.65 SUMMiT RIDGE 7ROAD RICE PAUL JACKS-0-N JR. & R)CE., SANDRA MAR 7AX# 0M.02-Ca-12-00--0000 Irk ' \ � i' ' -.' - _ @i P ledl :A paiedo-i PeO�j E)Dp!� I!wwnS Z W<X' '8LLIeN � � ��� ��� . . � � ~�^ � Z� _0 � \ \ � ' �� LU 0 QL 7m- 0 r! C Q) U3 43 75 z Lu (A CL C) (U 0 4D -D m (a m 0 ca (D a 0 a a Cl ID a) a _0 c a c -Z r- r- a c u lu klu -M m to 0 m - c- - - 2 1p a. w M D (X n =1 D :3 cc ix Ix Ix LL m ca f/ ; 4) C: d | | ] | | | | | | | | | | | ] \ \ ] t I nuep 'Ae :a.le @i P ledl :A paiedo-i PeO�j E)Dp!� I!wwnS Z W<X' '8LLIeN A0 _— :30ad ' 09Z = „ l ::flvos :3144 /dl JOHinv ji jJ! Dii n Ao(i�iA iinnns ' /�, I r , . y 4 '_ + l !'„ I'I. ,f 'I •pr., � I � ! / �'�' ;� _ V r - . •'' l+ 6� A 1 ; f A i r � .�_' �k � ` I' ' � r `^ fIT 7 � ds'' �' '' .1 Er r w F i S�J �.;.dA.° I'.. j r . ,'' , 4,`✓ Lr llr , wyy "�'f'' �a "/J' y yi 1 F ^'�' a >` • } yr. p ' r '� _ A,{ f '` - -�, ;. .. f - , r l y n + C r �j i'it''/' r r: +n ' "4Y IT t }1 or y .� j :,� •�'� ' .4 �i^ •� �r, ' ,. ry6 .�.y.A�' S� r!.- I< !kt �`'� � �A l � i � r .. • ', g F �, r ° , �. F ��. J d � r7r _ - 1 ..�' i ' S _ Al . f l �''4�.,'.".�T ✓ T, OOP 7 t , 7 a „ 4 Y i� �' �; �d� � • 1 � ' 'qa` �.� 'r� y / - . * .Mj� , r' e. --.k_ j • r i h "��r u ,! 'fr �r r ,.' _- ; r _. �� " "�n �. '�_., 1, '` �\.iy \ ry � b LL ,,hrr' 1r , 'r /� � _ 'I ti Y • r ' IT( r 4 .. yam._. k ; 1J/ ,, �., f ,y. #,,. �� .. ".,, � r , ; �'' .:. rk'.. rl : ' ''`•t+ r, 1.' r :..� -;, � �. f.:" ° '4►1./� �`': ,,? ` � I .. _� —._' ."' ..; '/- r "b , � �• r�, '1k��" ,'�� j 1 �' ew / 1 ' , _ -� \'\ 1 I! � - d. t { r ^.;�k` � t J ,��'_� -°j p w y �• l� � ��K !! 1 � I o rr � b� _� ��. `,� ;, 'rksa { � _� ,,7"�r�!�' - .tif i 1h , ' ," ,r , r . . , „d Ir � « r �f; a '!' I f ., - �'. r j L� � t., k"I'l • d ' ' t � y,r.•. ''.� � 1 " ;j y ,y ill � >a �IP: ��� i� �,� /A 'r' '�f re ,'"' �, .� �' �, �' 'h A�!j.3 P .�A #: � � ,.. `1� j '\ :�' { d'.� �.���'{ f•r 1. � y{ "i�J �" ... �`. \* r , �° �� :: ' ^T_'_''�,, r �� , . '\ � �9 l"•.� . , '�N• _ +r i ` ,s r . 4 :1 /° ,i r.{t ,q� : r 1 4 � , ' � d •. ��,.. P 1',A � � r + � �:.' � � �t 1,.' tar yx > - I u , , r I 3� F„'r 4' C j f� ' �'I r l A � d Y '�x „ ` , '�. 'f ,. I, :l” :;�...- ^° f •,, N. � � d � I. ' `^ -. .jr1,'�'., °,,. �� /lf y, r r. a., n � I �-•,. ` ' .r ) 1,r�)' � . :; a ` . . r 4 5 P �n , Olt - r ! T' - ' •' � i 1 r. ^ ° ¢ j�ypyry,'�,y , �, A• .1,11'.1 f 1' ". .m " rv. ` r� ;. � C�� q' '�„� , ! r . r 1 , f�l �� ; . �_ �1• �tl � t d � yyy ytr . P \\ I ,f '/ ' � I, ✓ i^ �� ,�' a f I .1 4: I p � , � I �'4 � e + ,J..,. V f _• rY 3 ° p _ 1• r-�Y !C 'J y rt / i�r 'r 1. 11 i:' f��f J I 1 f�� a` I.� � .P °Y -_ _ ... , �k • , - rk. _ .� �• v It r ,� I r y ,.lri }�; " , t a'� 'r. 1 t °'R.. 1 'y 1 .1 jr r. .. ,Y • t , _. QO / `'� _...:�� � k - eC• . ' r d' '� P e r r T�.� F',1' � - - ,., .,r -J .;, ,�r� - -. 1 r , f.� .;�'� .. ! .:,, - f�'.'' I �,ti'"� 4 ,k;�r° ...._ , �,*^�. �r *' .f ! � �,:� �� 0 �• � � ^ ri g }S. r.t.`';, � /�' '�F L�1 yy +�ryy ' t VT P M p „I 1 1 Z�LI , / / � O ✓ ' y , Q e LD CD X <C elf m © F I� Q .w . \ � w �. M w r , l w � b \ o `tn CO co ot, u Q � 1 r S' 1� \ - e ` q p@ l t T •�„ .:. �t'�5. 1 c; � hF���. �' \ M Q • ' I i �" r rm. : ff /J �, I " � .,r `'�! ,• \� ._.�� ,,�„ - ``• \'� d i \ . 1 �"b,' w � 1 es '�` � Y — �! � � I L:. r ` ' 1 � � `�.�,. e r "A� + M ! �'^ � w d , 1 �C`( / / /// r fir. ps ,,1 r` o Op yN d o ` � , •r"' r. i \ ` -. � \ , ryj A 4 �' '' � � d � 1 , ✓ �,. - 4 ,�"y 1 On ' - I 1 try �,r S e D : N 0 :P a r4 f x T , • �, � fit � o W Vkl � m o U) N N . µ y ti Y,M U) 45 s , n � , N r � q �".I ;' o o_ err �� ��w Q u o �, t g h ,, rrr s rn O - ozf o o ,* KS r" V � 1 ,' 1 j7' m N ©� Lli \•� ! U Q LLI �t� a ,rtes �� 4 b / ����I s CD y ' " �'` Op �'' � r.• �' U � ` +� � c, r+ �` a .d � op ,/ � n, c� t A �fj Ih kY a t �, •Mr + k! A'1 t� +T W Q �E — �`4, �I _ t �6� t�Y Q ww �w�N s J �xF I`kt6� f 1- ( r � _ \ +S' ^ a Q r �, JX a Q r d o 1 ! a • la p � p O O Lo k 00 4 � «-' .w- I - Z Cs z , \\ O [h otS O c.,y`iy ."' I - ,.+ ` rq s`: , �' 1 .� M + `c1 Ur O ,g + M / r r ! ✓r v,,i. �'` } IsAI• II�� 4 , - ' W ,r' L) d r f Q TJ O . "1 , �,t, :� a ,f sT d: n - * q+✓ p r,,,., ] ' e " a 5+' r l +„ r . _ p Q Q cr) ` r� k � f • r� , #� �p6� { r�+! r.1 "� u) •�: f } Z oa w o W z a _ Yr 3' r:fa r�! i,r w �.v�P r t Iry p,r, "�� OO L Q 4,;, l a U 0 F ^ r 1 N !r t�k " 1 ai T O U " rd �r `Pt .r F " \ r �'` , Q O N (X ¢ O f 1 r t r �,y .\ _ P fk� t n i 1 � ,�I .''�. q . 'h1r�4 ✓� ��� ' O 1- . i ;;l J O 7 . mr + 'n, ++ r {.: v. O' �(� f q r •s "T e , r f f 4 ��- •I /� '� I ' / , ; 7 _ - r Y r1 d r �'t >tia" 7 .Ar 1���, r � `` a yii S w t+ � N + r ,A �i. +?Y F SGgL = .,�" y ,.�: T.� . 1' - ' � r te �, ' �Y , r 1 r `hl Q � (� O ' Lo W 00 OC 1 °F' 'rlr. y!�'i t '�i#v. � �OVLS� -" ;11 '�.t ' =7• fv ;b' �, ei'�` A.1 '.�,, � :F'!I '4' r! Q , . `'',� f� (� � ` � '� `� �' le N�t� err 1�fiir �r J'' ' gg �1 \ �• I— �(A k¢k1 + a�' !• � � L �.p. "r .+ 111', jf, -r;" / ` el', t A�t� "1� a r r y� � � ` + \\ :'� ♦ t tI � � Oj \. r i j ' ' ., f" i r•. N l� f, 1+. f ' R , J � ' :�K , p'1 41 l� OO� '\ .N'RM , ! . \ r ,J\ w ; W '. 9 1 ! ;z 0 yt,° iirr� , M - r y . rrr „r:' .�. � ! ��'. �5. r �{,a ,•'. . • l�al�., wet .1' �, r r{ �' �' .,, ��r ? �,��.x I�` " f , I`� , OO �. r.., r� •: i �t1' , w r r y aP'ti `p'I ._i r:, .1J y +. w'�1p , r :A. r w ,Y.a' y , ..r• {, .r .. ��'. '' r . LVM CD, , do -, ., . r r... '.a .t '.r, .�" [r.,..ur i!, ,: Xt. •., .- .I;'N + t t1 'V'�. i ,, i�� ";, "° _ ��. y�Y_..'�' -,1' r '•w' r qr� 1' ' ' � p�z. l� r {w� {'�. r..'��•� 7 A ... y � � :#Ir. .;l � �w, 4. "' ," • •: � ', n.. �". t ~� - ,�� I ,n r,w ?4 {rJ�..�t' i ' ` �,� ja�' Y. ,Ar K'OF _ .r 1. ,s °f, r r4 a ix :! �, v� M1. ',t.. "r� A s„ 'Pr d'/, �ry " "� '' ' ?•a ,` r '� , }� ` ` k .1 , - 7 :`•,° q. J r. , If °•�.' r' t + t �.,r . ` .• � Iq �". ,! ' .1 " �r�, g',t d � � >r +, Y,r. (fj tG '6 +.a '- �',�t� •' �� ° 1 �L9 � r ,��f' ^' '�� `�`ry� r• M '' , '" , ��" ;� :i'��' w P 1� ^' w.1d. ,, • i� "k' ""•� 1 ' � '�^�'Y�.';`�j�' '�''t .� l ; j , hherr 1r :.. � �, , �'+ "F ++fir , • 7. � a� � �, - ,,, : w : ; ,: r " r 1 • a. •- • .�yr - r '� a.p' . "i4, rF�4, r .I i +' ° r•A ,. �` GiJ ",a`:v F ^^!. .r.t'r '.'`! Pr •. t. ... '.". .r. '' "r , r,,\ ..., ��•,r 1.A NMOIAS SV :31VOS J-vm . . ........ .... . [L-("Z- :31VO Aiis -3oau innns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,p < .,�, <t V 1 ! t.�� 3 r� � , a t { '', x.E� � E� ; (( i3 �'.' €. 1 �, ��:�1 .i., �: �.x.t1 tA ) t Y E2 ? lS IS tSS1�4S�f { yIls u0jj.nna7: O O 00 I'D O O O O O O O O d N o CO �D v N o p p q p C) CD O O 00 �D 1 (U o 00 lD d' O C> O O O O p O C� O C: N O CO "D d' N O 00 iD 4 (1J p C� Ca O CO .k O O o n c0 M M C1� C1\ Cri 00 CO 00 00 co 1- I- f- f- f- �0 �D �0 `D r0 Ln in !1) 9) D �t � b HIMI Mili IIIIIII 11111 I IT 1 till IITMIM ITMIM lilt O + N C) 0A A N N O O N C, O - F CS N i O I Q 00 �Y v O O O C� rd O O C7 O W 9 er' r-1 f O C� (Y1 W Y =� 0 o N 00 Y c 0 a � 0 CD w © �a 0 i fi CL c n rl o 1 I o Q © 0 v C ° o W m ! vow �> C, + CD W Q Q h � o k o -i- o 0 1 o � 0 CD 1 C Its : N O Q T Q L T t (JO �0 d N N N m I'D d .4 ,-1 - N o w 11 1t N o w m m (7N m G\ m N N .-, .-, .-a .-1 �-+ .-� 110 `1 N o w 0 -q N m m N r- r r- r .-� .-E a .-, .-, -� . o w tD d N a w �D d N C7 � �0 n n o o 0 �-+ v-1 ,-1 . .-1 •-1 4 r, .--1 .-1 � �r- C ° W k 1 r �n T S > f mjl Y E ' „ I s y a • t. - I IL I to < 99 - 4 « a � _ . A _ ,« a =_ • - s r °. , _ - � >F u . « w •r 4 d k n + ,a � �J � � -_ _ .. -. w . ,. ���_ �Rr r • ��! ".. r � 1 ±_ Y ri _ �•� - � �, -' `. iy� 1 \. F ` r r • `t _ x Y .., 1 ��, 1r r - ;.'� e Y k Jlr' .� - « _ . ` r ''s t' r i. c. _ '.! 1 66 Y j i 1 y 8 a , , 'pY�3rv. c A m F: +V` �_ - "F. �.S - s ' = "'. .. `: � _'. ,- - - , a � � � {y� • - . : '� �"" : -�� � I ^ - �.. i . k ,. _ -. � « .. w A � � �` � - , - ! Y 9Y; :Jl,u i� �.'^ 7 . : P d ' r' '9n �,,. . '. � II v „ t + - � � ". ' • E re. • r F k ar - . a -• r _ " 0 x >4 ' - 3 '. � � -� = L .±. - �'.- _�- •- �. - "' �' a -- x. � , e .. �,_ �r �. -- �.E .. ' • _ 'f`` �w_ R ,. - - - YI N. • k a. - ��• - _. •� -.a � _ _ '� -_ t _ F - � H .dY f� ;.. r, ra'.� ! . r , a AC lit 7k t 1 41 TV no - r yrya � • I� r , s k • • 5 � �' s r E' , •. r , i , • I - ; _ tom- _ - `:<✓ '�"� � a. x� - - � :'� � '� " - , a • .r -- • it . , �� � -r`#' . � � - •' •' "- "roe. ,- �r _ _ ` -,. _ E: �.. - - , ^ f 3r x � - li � I . .- _rte„ TIT PS Is Old , � r , • . s. as _. � � � � Y - - _ -- _ - r. s . • Y ° i Su i c v-. , t ' L - 6 e- - , K y _ ° I S r er s , - 1 w� I = x r is • N � - v."r � s. R. F r T � u f r gal —r - v 3e_ a •T - - - �� r r y �{ ii rr , , - Jr All 4 s _ ' � T. Fi 1 - � . n' +• :. ` �I - :� �, u M � �!N!RIAU_' '4 p � 1 Y � � �• 4 .M � � � i y y_ _ ±�, . �/ � -'� � :, � •fir c ♦A. _ 4 � «`rte ... 1 Or � : Y 1 .i ' __ - , 1. •. t•� n ' r �• �"•r "� -rte � _ F 1.W w �.� rn�►� w� , r LL— _d f . _ EX pi LHd SM0C1�7�� QNVI.1�:J-00 W e6- Ak -44 44 6 le 1w j I t r 7l, j 1-4 oe Ir oo A l A I M 41 Lit -To .4 it e M -j xvc s, w �� � - "� ` ^�, rf• � p � � � ' 1 5,l � 4 � i/ If C MCI' p. I Cp Q IQ Ar ! r F 1 l� fi r, f =` � 1 � • '�,•. �• y� ', �y �1, ,� ; ? � I } j �� ,� � � • J � � f . � I � d � � J 1 J : � � • I { (�� Y I 1 � �� l 1 I� � ��•.1 ; �. 1 1 ' 1 JJ pry r i ui uj CL 4 4 I ' !� r i � < LU \ c4 1 Ul Il ,r 6 n z 1+--ul /5/12 letter to water and roa times From: Beverly Long <rocknest1 234 @gmail.com> To: ronbettty <ronbettty a@aol.com > Subject: letter to water and roa times Date: Mon, Mar 5, 20 2 4:24 pm Attachments: broadcast tower on_ Reads — Mountain ,edited,docx(I7K) ron, please confirm you have received, with a reply The western Virginia water authority is proposing a broadcast tower on Read Mountain. I am not in favor of the tower being added to the other eye sore that is already there. We have been a residence of this mountain for 16 years and find it beautiful in all seasons of the year. In the winter the only unnatural structure on the mountain other than the dwellings is the water tank. We on the mountain pride ourselves in the up keep of our property and we work at keeping the area as natural as possible. Some of us do not even have lawns. When new neighbors move in, the one thing that they love is the rustic natural scenery. We were very happy that the Read Mountain Alliance was developing a park on top of the mountain to be used by everyone. The land was donated and at present the park is being maintained &expanded. The water department wants to install a radio tower inside the water tank property. The tower will be used to read meters. The cost of the tower was said to be $49,000. I was never told what the cost per meter would be. This is only a small part of a larger plan on meters reading. It was stated the overall cost will be $3,000,000. It was also stated that the company that is installing this system estimates a payback period of 12 years. It was not stated if these figures were accurate or even checked by a non bias group. In the 12 years of the payback period, who will pay for the towers and meter reading? I suspect the rest of the residents of Roanoke County will have to pay for it. We were /5/12 letter to water and roa times I, as well as the other neighbors on Read Mountain,, am requesting to put the tower in someone else's front yard. Maybe the people that made this decision would like to have it in their front yard. This way they can enjoy the beauty and benefits of ameter- reading tower. Thank you Bev Long 2858 Summit Rid Road Roanoke., i loverdale f�6�54 20 02i !2 Read Mountain _Ro Bon Olit -mullit-m (Wlt Club Bluo Hilk 3W Fz� R n a n k There's little of an except beaut on this peak, and conservationists hope to keep ift that wa By TIM THORNTON The aft-plane looked no bi than a post- a stanip as it glided quietl above the valle 0 it tilted, tuniffi g slowl back on its loiNm path. Then it drifted doiim to a runwa that looked as if it had been drawn on the vfalle floor xvith a cUd's marker. Geor Ke leaned a his walkin stick as he took in the viow. "There aren't man places where y ou can 1c,01_, do�llrli Oil aft-planes," he said. The top of Read .11ountain is one of those place, 771A." ROANOKE TIMI-,'S Ke Ron rawfordand Bill Gord had cli'llbed the Mountain to show off the trails the helped build and to talk about the park the want to help create. Ke and Crawford have sj)ent most of their lives %Nithin si of the mountain that s on the Roanoke Count Count- J border. Gord spends a lot of his time leadin g roups of trail-bUildin volunteers into the woods, includin the woo&% on Read Motuitain."' Ke CraNNrford, (Iord and the rest of the Read Mountain Alliance �vant to kee hutidreds PLEASE SEE NIOUNTAH N/A 6 PHOTOS BY JOSH WILTZER / THE /?0- 1,N 771 x, Few would ar that the view could be more beautiful from Read Mountain, which Is on the border of Roanoke and Botetourt counties. Geor ��.e look,in west while h1kin Frida with friends Bill Gord and Ron Crawford, sa he worl1es about encroachin development Gettin a head start orl aUtUrnn, a black ; UM tree leaf alon a hikin trail is one of the first in the area to chan color. Governor - throws his weight behind effort to save ,Read Mount f deve! o ' F. By WILLIAM LITTLE Staff Writer Neither rain nor misty fog dampened the efforts of the lob hikers who participated in the first Read Mountain Take -a- Hike -a -Thou Sunday. Young children, elderly couples, whole families and individuals all from the Read Mountain Alliance nixed with media representative5 and politicians to scale the muddy mountain to raise money for the alliance so it can directly purch(rse parts of the mountain. Over a year ago, the Read N °.fountain .Alliance was owned in an effort to con- serve the mountain top that overlooks B otetourt and the Roanokes. The goal of the alliance, according to founder Ron Crawford, is to purchase between Soo and 600 acres on top of the mountain to be set aside as a public reserve. The reserve will include hiking, biking and horse trails, over- looks and picnic areas for the public to enjoy. Trails may eventually be tied into the Roanoke Valley Greenwwray hiking trail system. With houses slowly creep - in or up the mountainside, the Alliance hopes to protect the it from development by ptrr- A h � i M4 Gov. Mark Warner holds up the read Mountain Alliance shirt that Ron Crawford (right) gave to the governor Friday wl they met at Hotel Roanoke. chasing the ridge Line for around $500,000 froji four different private landowners within the next three years, Until Sunday, the Alliance had focused on gaining mem- bership and support by edti -- ca.ting the public on the mountain's natural beauty and worth. Sunday was the first effort to raise money for the pur- chase. "our goal was $10,000 Herald PhotoMiliam Li ;t.e and we surpassed that. We raised $10,332.50 and proba- bly some more will trickle ill later. For a rainy day, that's not too bad," said Crawford. After getting spores or hik- ers met at B onsack Mementary at 2 p.m. Sunday. From there, groups were bused to a hiking trail on the Roanoke County side of the mountain. Hikers had a halt`` mile hike up the mountain, and then a 2.5, mile hike down the mountain, ending back at Bonsack Elementary. Along the way, hikers passed "trail marshals, " or volunteers who helped point the way on the well- marked trail. Nfarshals handed out band -aids, bottles of water and granola. bars.. Hikers ranged from the experienced to people really snaking an effort to cross the mountain. °ongressnian Bob Goodlatte, (R-6th District -- ) and S tate See. Jahn Edwards ;Roanoke) also participated in the hike, While both acknowledged there is no hope anytirne soon of the Alliance getting financial support fr•oin the state or federal , governments, bath provided their moral support while hiking . the mounuain. "Fin really glad to see c i ti-- / "314 rriaking the effort to pre - sL'r e the mountain. lt.`s a scenic landnrrir�k tlaitt is a great asset to the l� c s,l ii oke Valley. Clnf artur ertcl the only way to preserve it is to buy it,$$ said Edwards. Goodlatte agreed. "''fie heath support the efforts to preserve thu rnorrntain," he said. Gov. Mark winner also voiced his approval of the Alliance's efforts to save the mountain from development can Friday at Hotel Roanoke. Wai iier was invited to join Sunda),-'s hike but coUld not do so becacrse of scheduling con- flicts. "It's definitely a worth while project. I'd love to dike with the group on Sunday, but urrl °ortu- nately I'm not going to be able to. I think it's great to see a ,group from the private sector taking this kind of initiative. That's something I'd like to see more of. The group has stepped rip to preserve this beautiful 'ir nnia landscape. which is something orrribly important," Warner cl u r ng his stop In Roanoke. P.J. is `ic c ol s and stepfa- ther Steve Graham were in the group h iking the misty moun- tain. `After you get up here and see how pretty it is, you appreci- ate the mountain and want to mai ntain its condition, it would be a shame to cart the timber off the mountain," said Graham as he took a rest with his son by the trail's side. V �. ,„�' Office of the Comil Adi-i'milstrator ELMER 0. HODGE P.O. Box 29800 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 April 15, 2004 Mr. John Dav Division Director, Plannin and Recreation Resources Department of Conservation and Recreation 203 ) Governor Street, Suite 326 Richmond, VA 23219-2010 Dear Mr. Dav Phone- (540) 772-2004 Fax: (54(x) 772-2193 E-mail: ehod Please find enclosed an application from Roanoke Count for the Vir Outdoors Fund Grant Pro We are re a g rant amount of $200,000 for the ac of a critical 150-acre tract of land on Read Mountain in northern Roanoke Count Read Mountain is a familiar landmark to the citizens of Roanoke Count as well as Roanoke it and Botetourt Count Due to its location between 1-81,1-581, US 220A, U 46 and its proximit to the Blue Rid Parkwa and the Appalachian Trail it is also viewed b thousands of commuters, travelers and hikers. Read Mountain is approximatel 3 miles lon I mile wide and 2 )50 feet hi Until now the mountain has remained undeveloped, however, the risin tide of urban development is sweepin across the valle at an acceleratin pace, and this mountain island will not remain untouched indefinitel The loss of Read Mountain to development will happen unless steps are taken to protect it now. In response to this need the Read Mountain Alliance, a dedicated g roup of Roanoke Valle r 'dents has initiated plannin plannin effort to protect Read Mountain. This citizen initiative has re sidents included historical research, mappin landowner contacts, trail construction, fund raisin and public outreach. Their effort is driven b the underlyin principle that the preservation of Read Mountain is a critical q ualit y of life issue in the Roanoke Valle with both local and re importance. Like most in the Roanoke Valle fore this mountain is privatel owned. The most important areas of Read Mountain are owned b four landowners. One of these tracts, 90 acres, has been placed under a conservation easement. Two other tracts, 230 and 70 acres, are currentl for sale. The fourth tract, thou important, is not likel to be developed soon and will be addressed in the future. This pro will be focused on the ac of a part of the 23 0- acre parcel that is for sale. Mr. John Davy Division Director, Planning and Recreation Resources Page Two April 15, 2004 On April 13, 2004, The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution authorizing this project and affirming the county's commitment to the preservation of Read Mountain, a valuable community resource. The County's ultimate goal is the creation of a Soo to 600 acre park/preserve on the upper slopes and ridgelines of this critical viewshed in accord with the Virginia outdoors Plan. we anticipate having the ability to purchase approximately 150 acres with this grant. This grant is a critical impetus for the preservation of this unique urban forest in Roanoke County, Having hiked the trails myself, and seen the breathtaking views of the surrounding area from its summit, I can attest to Read Mountain's value firsthand. The mountain's use as a parr and natural viewshed fulfills many needs as identified in our Community Plan and the Regional Roanoke valley open Space Plan as well as meeting the objectives of the Virginia outdoors Plan and this grant program. The nature of this citizen - driven initiative is important to its success. On behalf of the citizens of Roanoke County, I would like to thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 13, 20p4 RESOLUTION 041304 -5.a OF ROANOKE COUNTY'S SUPPORT FOR THE APPLICATION OF GRANT FUNDS FROM THE VIRGINIA OUTDOORS FUND, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND RECREATION WHEREAS, the Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) provides funds to assist local governments of the Commonwealth of Virginia in acquiring and developing open space and park lands; and WHEREAS, there are urgent needs within Roanoke County to preserve open spaces and to protect critical viewsheds from the Blue Ridge Parkway; and WHEREAS, Virginia's 2002 Conservation and Comprehensive outdoor Recreation Flan states that Read Mountain should be planned and managed to promote conservation, provide recreation, and protect critical v iewsheds and open space resources; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 071001 -1 adopted on ,July 10 2001 , the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors expressed their support for the preservation of Read Mountain; and WHEREAS, in order to attain funding assistance from DcR, it is necessary that Roanoke county support this project; and WHEREAS, the Read Mountain Alliance has committed to matching the grant fund amount it is required that Roanoke county guarantee that a proportionate share ($200,000) of the cost is available. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of S upervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, is hereby authorized to cause such information or materials as may be necessary to be provided to the Department of Conservation and Recreation and to enter 1 into such a as ma be necessar to permit the formulation, approval and fundin of the Read Mountain Project. AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Roanoke Count g ives its assurance that the funds needed as the proportionate share of the cost of the approved pro will be provided, up to $200,000. AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Roanoke Count g ives its assurance that the General Provisions of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act and the Vir Outdoors Fund Fiscal Procedures will be complied with in the administration of this project. AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Roanoke Count will operate and maintain the public recreation facilit in g ood condition and will provide permanent project acknowled si of the participatin fundin a and that this si will clearl state that the said facilit is a public recreational facilit AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Roanoke Count shall dedicate the metes and bounds of the Read Mountain Pro propert in perpetuit for public outdoors recreational purposes in accordance with the Land and Water, Conservation Fund Act. AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Roanoke Count g ives its assurance that all other applicable federal and state re governin such expenditure of funds will be complied with in the administration, development and subse operation of the Read Mountain Pro AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Department of Conservation and Recreation is respectfull re to assist in approval and fundin of the Read Mountain Project in order to enhance the standard of public recreational enjo for all the citizens. 14 On motion of Supervisor Altizer to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Church, Altizer, Flora NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor V1/ray A COPY TESTE: Diane S. Childers Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial officer Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance Arnold Cagey, Director, Community Development Janet Scheid, Chief Planner Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Read Mountain Alliance I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution 041304-5.a adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote with Supervisor Wray absent on Tuesday, Apri1,13 2044, Brenda J. Molton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors gJ P P Q( - T I WIF r)1\7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY GREENWAY COMMISSIO HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 2'2 2001 RESOLUTION DOCUMENTING THE SUPPORT OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY GREENWAY COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF' READ MOUNTAIN AND THE EFFORTS OF THE READ MOUNTAIN ALLIANCE. WHEREAS, a g roup of propert owners and interested citizens 1 izens have J.nitiated efforts to enhance and preserve Read Mountain* and, r WHEREAS, the mountains and rid lines in the Roanoke Valle are a uni and vital resource of scenic, natural and economic value and, WHEREAS, g oals, objectives and recommendations - of the Roanoke Valle Greenwa Commis include preservin the natural resources of the area includin rid line protection measures and, WHEREAS, the preservation of Read Mountain is compatible with the Tinker Creek Greenwa with potential trail linka and WHEREAS, the staff of the Roanoke Valle Greenwa Commission will assist the Read Mountain Alliance with technical expertise and g rant applications and, WHEREAS, the acquisition of conservation easements and/or real propert on Read Mountain throu non-Commission funds would be the cornerstone for the preservation of Read Mountain as a natural asset for all citizens of the Roanoke Valle to enjoy.* NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke Valle Greenwa Commission Co(mmission supports the followin 0 1. The Comm'ss Mountain. I ion has an interest in the preservation of Read 2. The Comm'ss i ion will work in concert with propert owners and citizens and the Roanoke Valle local g overnments to achieve these g oat s& 3 e That the efforts to preserve Read Mountain should include the ac of conservation easements or real propert where 1 approprIate, 4. The Commission supports the efforts of the Read Mountain Alliance to preserve the mountaintop areas of Read Mountain. Approved b unanimous v 01-c- ate of the le Greenwa Commission at a re etin o g us 22 20010 James Phipps, Chair April 6, 2004 Division Director, Planning & Recreation Resources Department of conservation and Recreation 203 Governor Street, Suite 326 Richmond, Virginia 23219-2010 Dear Sir or [Madam, I am writing this letter in support of the grant application for the acquisition of rid eline g 0 property on Read Mountain. This property would become an 'important element in the Roanoke county park system and provide much needed open space and passive p p p recreational opportunities for the citizens of Roanoke county. While this property is physically in the county of Roanoke I am confident that if this grant is successful, this property will quickly become a regional destination. It will provide safe access to hiking trails and ultimately will link up with the Roanoke Valle Greenway system providing even more exercise opportunities for citizens of all ages. The Roanoke county Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism strongly supports g Y pp this grant application and looks forward to adding this critical property to our inventory of p y ry public parks. Sincerely, Pete Haislip, Director 1206 KESSLER MILL ROAD - SALEM, VIRGINIA 24153 PHONE (540) 387 -6078 Roger B. Holnback The western Virginia Land Trust strongly supports Roanoke County application for a Execu Director . Division Director Gwendolyn W. Mason Planning Planning and Recreation Resources B O A RD o� T R US TEE S of Conservation and Recreation Barbara B Lemon 203 Governor Street President Richmond, VA 23219 --2010 Lucy R. Ellett conservation restriction on the property this grant is for, but the owne has shown no Vice Pre sident April 7, 2004 Gary R. Duerk We feel that the acquisition of this parcel will play a significant role in the preservation of Treasurer the entire top of Read Mountain, with the eventual plan for the mountain top to be a James M- Wilson Subject: VA Outdoo Fund Gr Roanoke County Joe F. Miller by our Greenways system of interconnected walking and recreational trails. Secrelao Dear Sir or Madam: Elizabeth H. Belcher A.w. " Bro The western Virginia Land Trust has been acting as fiscal agent for the Read Mountain M. Rupert Cutler Alliance for almost two years. we have received donations in excess of $40,000 f rom friends and neighbors of Read Mountain who want to see the upper slopes of this Sibyl N. Fishburn beautiful mountain preserved for future generations to enjoy in its present undeveloped Broaddus C . Fitzpatrick forested condition. we only allow the expensing of these funds in accordance with our David P Hill mission, board direction, and specifically for the effort to preserve Read Mou nt a in. Robert H. Hunt The western Virginia Land Trust strongly supports Roanoke County application for a Anne M. Jennings Virginia Outdoors Fund Grant to purchase a critical and threatened 140 acres of Read Gwendolyn W. Mason Mountain. we have made our partnership with the Read Mountain Alliance and the Lynn H. Meyer preservation of Read Mountain a central focus of our conservation effort in the Roanoke Valley. we were able to secure a very restrictive conservation easement on an adjoining James G. Nuckolls, MD 90 acres a year and a half ago, and we made every effort to secure a similar voluntary Howard C . Packett conservation restriction on the property this grant is for, but the owne has shown no Janet Scheid interest in anything other than a fee sale. Catherine B. smeltzer We feel that the acquisition of this parcel will play a significant role in the preservation of J. Richard w ells the entire top of Read Mountain, with the eventual plan for the mountain top to be a James M- Wilson forested, largely natural, County Recreation Area connected to the entire Roanoke Valley James L waltz by our Greenways system of interconnected walking and recreational trails. ADVISORY C OUNCIL we hope you will give Roanoke County's grant application your most serious consideration. Charles A. Blankenship Cabell E. Brand Stncer Archie A. Campbell Liza T. Field / Ro . Holnback Talfourd H. Kemper Executive Director Robert B. Lambeth, Jr. Stephen W. Lemon John B. Williamson, Jr. 722 First Street, SW, Suite L, Roanoke, VA 24016-4120 - Phonedacsirrile (540) 985 -0000 - westemvirginialandtrust.org A publics } supponed charitable organization providing voluntary means to prornote the preservation of western Virginia's natural and cultural heri[ age. United States Department of the Interior W REPLY REFER TO L14 April 5, 2004 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Blue Ridge Parkway 199 Hemphill Knob Road Asheville, North Carolina 28803 John Davy, Division Director Planning & Recreation Resources Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation 203 Governor Street, Suite 325 Richmond, Virginia 23219.2010 Dear Mr. Davy: The 28-mile section of the Blue Ridge Parkway through Roanoke County dips down off mountain ridges and into the farming, pastoral landscape of the Roanoke Valley. Completed in the early 1960s, the Parkway through Roanoke County presented visitors with unspoiled rural landscapes and forested mountain slopes. There are picturesque stone arch bridges and spur and loop roads that offer spectacular views. Unfortunately, much of the growth in Roanoke County since 1950 has been along major roads within view of the Parkway. once rural farm scenes now feature sprawling suburban residential developments and the demands for housing are placing tremendous pressure on the remaining undeveloped land. For all of these reasons, in 2003 this section of the Parkway through Roanoke County was designated as a Last Chance Landscape by Scenic America. One of the most critical views from the Parkway in Roanoke County is of Read Mountain. Although commercial development has occurred at the foot of the mountain and residential development has crept up the sides, the upper slopes and ridgelines remain untouched and provide a beautiful, restful backdrop. The Blue Ridge Parkway has worked for the past nine years with Roanoke County to preserve and protect the remaining unspoiled Parkway views and to mitigate the damage done at others. we are, therefore, pleased to support the efforts of Roanoke County to obtain grant funds to purchase a critical property along the ridgeline of Read Mountain. If successful, this acquisition would forever protect a large section of the ridgeline of Read Mountain and add to the area already protected by conservation easement. Visitors to the Blue Ridge Parkway spend billions of dollars to travel this scenic All - American Road and enjoy the rich patchwork of natural and cultural resources free from the commercial traffic and congestion of high -speed highways. Intentionally obscured from the visitor is the fact that the Parkway averages little more than Soo feet in width along its 459 miles of road. Most of the land viewed from the Parkway is privately held. For this reason, the Blue Ridge Parkway supports local efforts to preserve and protect these private lands that provide the critical landscape enjoyed by Park visitors. Sincerely, r Dan Brown Superintendent Bill Gordge Executive Cormmittee Member Read Mountain Alliance 3130 Evergreen La. SCI Roanoke, 'ETA 24015 Dear Bill, i am writing to let you know that the Appalachian Trail Conference endorses. and supports the work the Read Mountain Alliance is undertaking to preserve Read Mountain in Roanoke County, Virginia. Read Mountain is not only important to the citizens and community surrounding the City of Roanoke, but it is also important to the Appalachian Trail Conference and the Appalachian Trail (A.T.). Although this area is outside of the acceptable Corridor for protection or acquisition by our federal agency partners, it remains a critical visual resource to the A.T. In fact, the view from the A.T. as it traverses across from the I -81 corridor and up onto the slopes of Fulhardt Knob, looks directly at Read Mountain. This is. the - dominant aspect of the view from the AT and encroachment or development on Read Mountain would certainly detract from the natural setting, and negatively effect the A.T. and the Trail experience. Therefore, protecting this valuable aesthetic and visual . resburce is critical to the protection of the Trail Experience. Furthermore, protecting Read Mountain would provide an extensive green corridor around the City of Roanoke, linking AT protected lands, Read Mountain, and the larger natural corridor associated with the Blue Ridge Parkway. This is an invaluable resource to the community of Roanoke, and the natural habitats and animal populations in the area. We commend your work and the work of the Read mountain Alliance to protect this incredibly important resource. If we can be of further assistance, please let me know. Best Regards; Teresa Martinez, Regional Representative Southwest and Central Virginia Regional Office Appalachian Trail Conference Cc; Dick Clark, Roanoke Appalachian Trail Club, Bob Proudman, Appalachian Trail Conference; Bob Williams, Appalachian Trail Conference National offices: 799 Washington Str'eef, P.O. Box 807, Ha,*rs Ferry, West Virginia 25425 ® (304) 535 - 6331 rian T. Fitzgerald chair Parthena M. Martin seaWa Now ftbadReVon Pamela Ahlen nod -Adantk Rqbrr Walter E. Daniels Southern R � eon M�mh� �t Bob Almand Paul Burkholder Carl C. Demrow Vice c�►tr �- �v��,�d Kennard R. Honick r►M��- Stephen L. Crowe Thomas 0, Lewis Charles A. Graf Sandra L. Marra Phyllis Henry Sochar Y �' d Thyra C. Sperry Vice L'Iafr- �1�►t�a�- A�f#an�� Arthur P. Foley Ats, 5�,ry Dennis C Regan Eric C. Olson Robert P. Kyle William S. Rogers � Marianne). Skeen David N. Startzell Andrew L. Peterson Glenn Scherer )amen M. Whitney, Jr. vice chair -sDur1em F xftv d, ?C n Ann H. Sherwood William Steinmetz Steven A. Wilson BOB GaODL.ATTE , 6TH DISTRICT, VIRGINIA 2240 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON, DC 20515 -4606 (202) 225 -5431 FAX (202) 225 -9681 www.house.gov/goodlatte talk2boh@mail.hause.gov Congress Of the United take ASSISTANT MAJORITY WHIP CHAIRMAN, HOUSE REPUBLICAN House O f Representatives HIGH TECHNOLOGY WORKING GROUP CO- CHAIR, December 7, 2001 CONGRESSIONAL INTERNET CAUCUS Mr. Ronald 0. Crawford Advocate Read Mountain Alliance 607 Ray Street Roanoke, Virginia 24019-75 Dear Ron: COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE CHAIRMAN, SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS, OVERSIGHT, NUTRITION AND FORESTRY SUBCOMMITTEE ON LIVESTOCK AND HORTICULTURE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY SUBCOMMITTEE ON COURTS AND IN 3"ELLECTUAL PROPEHTY . SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE CONSTITUTION SUBCOMMITTEE ON IMMIGRATION AND CLAIMS Thank you for asking me to participate in the efforts of the Read Mountain Alliance to preserve Read Mountain for the future. I amp very happy that so many folks have become partners in the work to protect the "woodland island" that is such a landmark in the Roanoke Valley. It is a testament to you and the Alliance's numerous other advocates that you already have garnered the support of Roanoke County, the City of Roanoke, Botetourt County, Roanoke Valley Greenways, and the Western Virginia Land Trust. I applaud your comprehensi*ve approach to the work ahead of you, Involving public and private organizations as well as businesses is critical to showing the importance of this preservation effort, Read Mountain deserves to remain a natural landmark for future generations. Wildlife will continue to flourish, recreational opportunities like hiking will continue to be available, and the beauty of its natural features will continue to be seen as a result of the Alliance's direction. I wholeheartedly support the Read Mountain Alliance in its drive to keep preservation of Read Mountain a priority. The Roanoke V'alley's well -being in years to come will be enhanced thanks to the desire to make the mountain's preservation a part of the region's environmental protection and economic development plans. Whenever I can be of help, please call upon me. ❑ 2 SOUTH MAIN STREET SUITE A, FIRST FLOOR HARRISONBURG, VA 22801 -3707 (540) 432 -2391 FAX (540) 432 -6593 ❑ 916 MAIN STREET SUITE 300 LYNCHBURG, VA 24504 -1608 (804) 845 -8306 FAX 1804) 845 --8245 ❑ 10 FRANKLIN ROAD, S.E. SUITE 540 ROANOKE, VA 24011 -W2121 (540) 857 - -267'2 FAX (640) 857-2675 ❑ 114 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE STAUNTON, VA 24401 --3307 (540) 886 --3861 FAX (540) 885 -3930 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ._ a yihf- �� COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS: COMMERCE AND LAROR COURTS OF JUSTICE EDUCATION AND HEALTH RULES JOHN S. EDWARDS 2 1ST SENATORIAL DISTRICT CITY OF ROANOKE; PART OF ROANOKE COUNTY POST OFFICE BOX 1 179 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24006- ROANOKE: ( 540) 985.8690 RICHMOND: 19041 699.7521 September 5, 2001 Mr. Ronald 0. Crawford L1 44% 1 �t�.Lj I.�R L{rLi1A •1 S Aw Lt ;JY�r 607 Ray Street Roanoke, VA 24019 RE: Preservation of Read Mountain Dear Mr. Crawford: I am writing in support of the Read Mountain Alliance and the effort to preserve the viewshed, ridgeline and mountain side of Read Mountain in their present natural state. Read Mountain is a natural, aesthetic and recreational resource that must be preserved for present and future generations. This historic, natural landmark forms an important backdrop to the daily lives of many Roanoke Valley citizens and, indeed, is a gateway to the Valley. The mountain's tree cover enhances the Valley's air quality and its watershed adds significantly to the , Water quality of Glade and Tinker Creeks and the Roanoke River Basin. The proposed preserve would provide a wildlife habitat, create recreational opportunities and preserve the natural beauty of Read Mountain for many years to come. This initiative deserves the support of all Roanoke Valley citizens as it will help protect the quality of life that 1 a L3 t.L1 Ro 1i0 i.0 itiiw Dui: u 31 1 --i .� .cif :: iii i l.�: i t i i y . I am delighted to support the laudable efforts of Read Mountain Alliance. Sincerely, '5 7 John S. Edwards JSE:arb go A. VICTOR THOMAS 1301 GRANGE AVENUE, N . E. ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24012 SEVENTEENTH DISTRICT Ron Crawford Read Mountain Alliance 607 Ray Street Roanoke, VA 24019 -8021 Dear Ron, COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS. APPROPRIATIONS June 1 1 1 2002 AGRICULTURE, CHESAPEAKE AND l� NATURAL RESOURCES RULES I strongly support your efforts to protect Read Mountain and preserve it for future generations to enjoy. Read Mountain has been one of the Valley's most identifiable landmarks for many years. It is the backdrop to the view from thousands of kitchen windows and front porches. Read Mountain is an integral part of the history of this part of Virginia. Andrew Jackson once stayed at the Black Horse tavern. Colonel William Fleming, who served as interim. Governor of Virginia, once owned most of the mountain. It has been a part of the lives of generations of Virginians. The Alliance is of to a tremendous start, bringing together neighbors, governments, conservation groups, churches, schools, and Roanoke Valley residents of all walks of life. You are proving what a difference a group of committed people can make in their community. I strongly support your efforts to protect Read Mountain. I am sure that you will be successful, and that generations from now, Roanokers will still be able to look out their kitchen windows and see the magnificent mountain that we love. Sincerely, A. Victor Thomas COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA HouSE QF DELF-GAT E S RICHMOND DISTRICT: (540) 345 -4120 0 RICHMOND: (804) 6QB -1017 CLIFTON A. (CHIP) WOODRUM POST OFFICE BOX 990 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 240 05 SIXTEENTH DISTRICT Mr. Ronald O. Crawford Read Mountain Alliance 607 Ray Street Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Dear Mr. Crawford: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA HC7LJSE GF C.)ELEGATES RICHMOND September 11, 2001 COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS: CLAIMS (CO- CHAIR) GENERAL LAWS CORPORATIONS. INSURANCE AND BANKING MINING AND MINERAL RESOURCES RE: Preservation of Read Mountain I support the efforts of the Read Mountain .Alliance to preserve the upper slopes and ridge lines of Read Mountain in their present natural state. With development encroaching on many of the Roanoke Valley mountains, it is important and timely to work together to save this important landmark. The quality of life we enjoy in the Roanoke Valley is framed by "our" mountains, and I applaud this citizens' initiative to preserve the green space of Read Mountain. With kindest personal regaxds, I am CAW /cjc Cordially yours, 4 ! 4k Clifton A. Woodrum DISTRICT: (540) 982 -5547 • FAX-, (540) 982 -8750 0 RICHMOND: (804) 698 -101F3 6;.:ENATE OF VIRGINIA 0", � J. BRANDON BELL, if 22w.) SMI- rOR #AL ❑ISTR #CT AL OF 130TETOURT COUNTY; ALL OF THEE GITICS OF RADFORD AND SALEPa:AND PAR - r OI" P.'-0tATGOfvMRY AND ROANOKE COUNTIC -S p a x POSr OFFICE 13OX 20855 ROANOKC, VIRGINIA 2+1 to April 14, 2004 Division Director, Planning and Recreational Resources Department of Conservation and Recreation 203 Governor Street, Suite 326 Richmond, Virginia 23219 Dear Sir: #dJ ► { ■a i3Ji...'r'.i' }tC1i1 r�'; 'rf. :e (f'• +'(:[:� I strongly support the grant application of Roanoke County to preserve the beauty of Read Mountain. It is one of the most identifiable landmarks in the Valley. I urge you to Y g y approve their grant application to the Virginia Outdoors Fund. The effort to save this mountain as open space and a recreational resource will benefit present and future generations. It will also protect an important aspect of the Viewshed of the Blue Ridge Parkway and the Appalachian Trail. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, J. Brandon Bell V 1'• ONZLEE WARE SHENANDOAH BUILDING, SUITE 410 305 FIRST STREET, S.W., ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24011 ELEVENTH DISTRICT April 6, 2004 Division Director, Panning and Recreational Resources Department of Conservation and Recreation 203 Govermr Street, Suite 326 Richmond, VA 23 219 Dear Sir, COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS COURTS OF JUSTICE EDUCATION COUNTIES, CITIES A,IND TOWNS I am writing in support of the grant application of Roanoke County to the Virginia Outdoors Fund. `his grant will be used to provide recreational opportunities to the nearly 200,040 citizens that live within to miles of Read Mountain. It will also protect a critical wildlife habitat in a rapidly developing area and a prominent landmark will be preserved forever. I strongly support the efforts of Roanoke County and the Read Mountain Alliance in this citizen initiative and hope you will look favorably upon on their grant application. Si OW /fwh COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA HOuSE OF DELEGATES RICHMOND Member, Virginia Ise of Delegates DISTRICT: (540) 344 -7410 0 RICHMOND: (804) 698-1011 • E -MAIL: DEL AWARE HOUSE. STATE, VA. US -'- � Division Director, Planning and Recreational Resources Department of Conservation and Recreation 203 Governor Street Richmond, VA 23219 We are students in the fourth grade at Bonsack Elementary School. We can see Read Mountain from our classroom window. We think it is a beautiful mountain that we admire. Even though we are students, we understand how important the mountain is to us. The mountain is fun to hike on, have great picnics on and enjoy the view from. If houses are built on the mountain there will be erosion. Animal habitats will be destroyed and oxygen will be decreased. We have learned about these things in our science and social studies classes. These are some of the reasons that we, the fourth grade class at Bonsack, think Read Mountain should be saved. V -IePr vw� V �nrLs�ew ThpMo..S$on r��(►11h1��7;rr� 1J(2PGQ.Ui AudV4- Lh Sincerely, )P �c4 }Ca-c- (A 3 COL (3 Ly u r It /* uj Lu 1. • ,,� � � � 1- CL LA LU 'CIO LL ui kp it i r %� /' 1``' f f , F � � P ! I, ,� i r .4 Vo cl Q () iw w z ca CZ Yl ro Ll A Imp col lu �� r r CL � 7� f �� N f �' '' ul (A 3 COL (3 Ly u r It /* uj Lu 1. • ,,� � � � 1- CL LA LU 'CIO LL ui kp it i r %� /' 1``' f f , F � � P ! I, ,� i r .4 Vo cl Q () u y J it 51 F nr VQ 4 ,., Iv T c &j r -4 o v�_; � � � � � 4V Read Mountain Nature Preserve A Park Or Donated and Built b Volunteers Given as a Gift to Roanoke Count and the Citizens of the Roanoke Valle A"I V 01, APR! Aft AL 4p vp 6w IL Ae So % - A-I- Trail Built the Old Fashioned Wa With Hard Work b Volunteers POW IF %�_ jo TIM PL • `�� � 1V� .-ir �r��4 ri ��e "0 I API Rock, Rock, Rock LIU 40 E and Tools Provided b Volunteers .7 r. v. yd " . / ,.� �. `e ' i�!� �, - _ �... T p � ~� ' s �• ,te ' �! I 'IF 4t if 1 -.1 too 91C M. Read Mountain Alliance, Mid-Week Crew, Bo Scouts, School Kids Volunteers for Read Mountain T. 'm t'v � t "O " . U Aiw% 6 ... - j e 11y N#_ [a 'Al I "We I It. Vk Ile, Students Makin an Investment in a Park "Preserved Forever" EL—imu pr.; I ti y "t OF Ilk, AAOI Ilk, aff 7 OIL dm 1 "a to 0 1 pwi 55 k1w 311 EL—imu pr.; I ti Read Mountain - A Place to Hike and Enjo Nature Preservin Views From and Views of Read Mountain - 0 _ •�-� �� �� �' � F i „��`�' l'�JNI�v �l _� "Ni �+ � k T .� "�" �r� � 1�.'�a'y�� 1 1 1pWO6* CDT—' lb -'T +1� StC��-t �f��aµ,,,�on„�flti:�a M���M�z�. Fl---" 6-A LJ W C4 Q(CEL�---j TA+Ez-a- 7t) j Ly� c�z la L) N �AQT 1� �A -�'� fj 4�� y � cz, E: LO 0 v 1--solY I tils') Tva w p I W - T �( tA ( �d���i�.�J'�/ SktQ�a�S T44- - j4 y1� V'A<:y�; 3 Li-i-j (L �Ls- cTmi,- h"r ci=- TtJ� <46or I 441 lT ST�"i'�.:.� 2q� F°sR:"fi � I w, �bcT' Ttl r, i�t w 1. � mac, ��i..aC �5 pNn P1���a�b'Y 43+�u�T�t 1'ra�P�,��rs'C'S�� -�.. 7'it�� �l "i.�= C,�u�1.1rs 15 '2 5 � ?�. �;.1.�'alA;j °6 ~ >s i �' �u J eS+� R IS So THE wll� T �i� Pi c+ o4� ?`tr T +i � �P� � "�.f��a.� LW V) I T 7'�W 4E- P- f -S C-t'z4i S E- rL-%4 A T R.l tk& �'4Jb.)��INCge�:�'�+�p�� ON F f or:��. o�'t}c� asu -.c+�� �a'ros `fa�rc��a ��.�n�'Ct�� I h�lc�t �� a ,'z.�a:�� � TA+ fl .-IS I s T 7tE is�u�.� '��a� Su�4cs�srs��- ot� Tl��'��'M1'Ft�a���4r5c�� -S `��r'��`r�t "�.'('� '1`W 'K'rc�� [ll� 4>� vusP'M�kST �� 47 I cav �4 1 r­o (CA OT aC-4-A CmZoW004 Ttb Tt446 i Awu 6"1'4 �!fl7G.ei- kMe s Oct 1"FE c�fu. I 4;�i4oi �59 6 av tjAQ ke,%- ��`c.. (?,� �3 'T�k-4s 4 3��a�: , ia�c�aHS�S�''� • - r�� .���- ��:���+ r��:� Ua nor 73+ "Q'� t�tc.�oPos�roTo��. -ro Visws awa7 K'cac�r, °�1� $�, o�.'t�l� l�ouuTea�.1��,�, lo OF kQfA i, oC2.c]C�6� -1K C�?S,QcoO, 9 �.W°1QS`( °.�uC$b6V1'SIgJ1•$ �1� 'TZ{E `I'ktc �ouF Ge W R,RJ� ; • `/SL.wT+ktoU4m-U,- iT IS UNL(K�JL TftETo��sLwiu��t�r3au�.'i�+rc. arm PIA OA T44tjR L%A<AT(*s g� � SiiY�R_ SPE�Ca. $(�tal�Ntla us Tl�r N QJ �'` — `�� r 9~ � V, %E� V Pz-4 445� _ w u -a �"�� 77 �7 ri 4 - �� ��.. ('s k � Vk uow ! � — �e. +! � � �:'. ` �! ', i• � � � �. mil aw � - A 1 . Ak (Z' " i • � <SO �'1rN (5 ��� ��+ae Ali �� u�k�c� ...� Dam Ms��- a•n -S�; us T 4 o& �ldt -L��• ITS ht oal •�+s A y 7e vti rtaTRu F-xa, C, vortt� f 44�,s.� AS c- 4'��`TiaK S . Ti gort 7o M rw...m NA4T' �R.:.KA{ -" i r 7'� T1 C504AN��,��ahtc�r� P T%f !)C-64 k Sb 6p--piwlcd`CV!'a'r �pt� TH-e T owerr.*Pht�rwco 7to KTw� -� 4 Wit; 1 =' C e m q4 -' - �, Qt4x,� A-4 T -K4ai. C5 L cz, tA c r4%z rcatit, IC4 LLB - c �� _ _ 0 TS A -Nak vr 7RO kkk �Q� �4-C L� FS Q�rwk4� gk� sip, )eu P 4W4�w N f) ce-cm :kA4 lb 7f Q6 VI" TPJ,4 k-�A-tzr q�kN vs v (, �k - V Kati! ��.��iaa�, ta�� j- ���u�sz' you P u.��°r� w 'i'� -�� �r a�r� `�"�����,� d���.+ gyp . 'T� -Ets Mw �T�,'�°a� `ra ��`1°' l�'1 �e,.ac�,�y� Ire T'tt 1'�1't 'ot� ft��*Cftlkt Qr o CiV RZ 7 Ro �wobc.� ,VAS S¢ S4 0 o� j3�kttd� �F T�F1;� 'N1�atZET�1� (�'�cJ Cl �''zL�1 SuG'P�S�"T C0 S?4*1 4 SONS � �vetc6AlMa��'°'.'6'`aedhi�ll� "CAu1�� �,S1�K� �au.��y Gacs�►u�ay �MM�s�����"T�� AI.^ raw t�fa�wcs 1=laK� �Jl'P'ti�5�s� �i'�ol��o�sl��oSiT �h. Cam- Rem- The western Virginia water authority is proposing a broadcast tower on Read Mountain. I am not in favor of the tower being added to the other eye sore that is already there. We have been a residence of this mountain for 16 years and find it beautiful in all seasons of the year. In the winter the only unnatural structure on the mountain other than the dwellings is the water tank. We on the mountain pride ourselves in the up keep of our property and we work at keeping the area as natural as possible. Some of us do not even have lawns. When new neighbors move in, the one thing that they love is the rustic natural scenery. We were very happy that the Read Mountain Alliance was developing a park on top of the mountain to be used by everyone. The land was donated and at present the park is being maintained &expanded. The water department wants to install a radio tower inside the water tank property. The tower will be used to read meters. The cost of the tower was said to be $49,000. I was never told what the cost per meter would be. This is only a small part of a larger plan on meters reading. It was stated the overall cost will be $3,000,000. It was also stated that the company that is installing this system estimates a payback period of 12 years. It was not stated if these figures were accurate or even checked by a non bias group. In the 12 years of the payback period, who will pay for the towers and meter reading? I suspect the rest of the residents of Roanoke County will have to pay for it. We were told at the first meeting that other ridges and mountains were involved (Fort Lewis, 12 O'clock Knob, Mill Mountain, Penn Forest, South County of 220 and Hollin's mountain). If you will take the time to look at our ridges around the Roanoke Valley you will see every ridge and mountain has towers except Read Mountain. The footprint of "progress" is stomping out the beauty of the Roanoke valley. I, as well as the other neighbors on Read mountain, am requesting to put the tower in someone else's front yard. Maybe the people that made this decision would like to have it in their front yard. This way they can enjoy the beauty and benefits of ameter- reading tower. Thankyou Bev Long 2858 Summit Ridge Road Roanoke, Virginia 24012 STAFF REPORT Petitioner: Request: Location: Magisterial Districts: Suggested Conditions: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Western Virginia Water Authority Special Use Permit for Broadcasting Tower 2857 Summit Ridge Road Hollins 1. The proposed development shall be in substantial conformance with the concept plan entitled "Western Virginia Water Authority Summit Ridge Site" dated December 23, 2011. 2. The proposed tower shall not exceed a total height of 120'. 3. No lighting shall be allowed on the broadcast tower unless required by the Federal Aviation Administration. The Western Virginia Water Authority (WVWA) is requesting a Special Use Permit for a broadcasting tower located at 2857 Summit Ridge Road. The request is to allow for the WVWA to construct a 120' monopole tower with a 10' antenna on a 0.121 acre parcel zoned Agricultural /Rural Preserve District (AG -3) in the Hollins Magisterial District. The 2005 Comprehensive Plan indicates that the Future Land Use Designation of this parcel is Conservation. Conservation is a future land use area of particular environmental sensitivity due to topography, existence of unique land characteristics, conservation /open space /greenway easements, soil types or location with respect to other State or Federally preserved lands. Typical resources would include wetlands, ridgelines, mountainsides, scenic views from the Blue Ridge Parkway and Appalachian Trail, identified greenway corridors, productive agricultural lands, historical and cultural resources and threatened or endangered species habitats. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Broadcasting towers are allowed by special use permit in the Agricultural /Rural Preserve District, and are defined as follows: Any structure that is designed and constructed primarily for the purpose of supporting one (1) or more antennas. The term includes but need not be limited to radio and television transmission towers, microwave towers, common - carrier towers, and cellular telephone and wireless communication towers. Broadcasting tower types include, but are not limited to monopoles, lattice towers, wooden poles, and guyed towers. Excluded from this definition are amateur radio towers, which are described separately. Use and Design Standards for broadcast towers are defined in Section 30 -87 -2 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. Construction of the tower will require permitting and review through the Roanoke County Department of Community Development. 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background —The property is currently owned by the Western Virginia Water Authority (WVWA) and an existing 15' tall water storage tank is also located on this site. The WVWA is currently undergoing an upgrade of its entire communication system throughout the Roanoke area requiring 9 -10 new antennas. Topography /Vegetation — The property increases in elevation nearly 200' up the sloping hillside of Read Mountain. The proposed elevation of the broadcast tower is 1800' while the slope behind it rises to 2060' (130' from the ridge) and the ridgeline view should not be affected. The site is located well above all of the surrounding houses. The site and surrounding hillside is currently wooded with a canopy height of up to 75'. Surroundin Nei ghborhood — All surrounding properties are zoned R -1 and have a Future Land Use Designation of Neighborhood Conservation. The site is accessed via a gravel road off of Summit Ridge Road, but is not part of the residential development. 3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture — There is currently a graded, fenced in area where the water tank is situated. The proposal is to use this same area for the tower and no grading or site work is anticipated. Tower lype — The proposed tower is a 120' monopole with a 10' antenna on top. It will have a matte surface as required by County regulation. Section 30- 87 -2(D)9 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance states: A monopole broadcasting tower design is recommended. The board may approve an alternative broadcasting tower design if it finds that an alternative type of structure has less of a visual impact on the surrounding community and Roanoke County, and /or based upon accepted technical and engineering data a monopole design is not technically feasible. Cost shall not be a criteria for determining broadcasting tower design. The tower is not required by the FAA to have warning lights. Therefore, it will not have any lighting. The tower will be constructed with galvanized steel, its color will be a dull matte blue /gray in color to minimize visual impacts. Colocation — As part of the broadcasting tower requirements, the applicant must evaluate colocation possibilities with existing towers in order to preclude the construction of a new tower. As a part of this project, WVWA has evaluated over 60 sites throughout Roanoke City and County. Its goal is to provide faster, more efficient transmittal of its data for the purpose of both billing and also for emergency situations such as leaks. They determined 9 -10 antennas would be needed for sufficient coverage throughout the area and all but this specific one were able to be colocated. The tower is not intended for any sort of commercial purpose. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) —The location and size of the proposed tower does not exceed the FAA notice criteria. As such, additional coordination with the FAA relevant to the construction of this tower is not required. Access /Traffic Circulation —VDOT had no comments on the petition. Fire & Rescue /Utilities — The proposed use will not result in additional impacts for fire and rescue. Additionally, the Roanoke County Fire Marshal's Office does not view the tower as a building, therefore the fire flow requirements do not apply for this project. Economic Development — The Roanoke Department of Economic Development offers no objections to the 0, proposed rezoning assuming the development conforms to the Community Plan and is compatible with the surrounding land use. Greenways /Western Virginia Land Trust — In 2002, an 89.82 acre parcel adjacent to the subject property was put into a conservation easement through Western Virginia Land Trust as part of the Read Mountain conservation effort. At this time, several restrictions to the future development of the property were put into place, including: No permanent or temporary building or structure, including, without limitation, communication towers, shall be built or maintained on the Property other than non - residential outbuildings commonly and appropriately incidental to the use of the property as a public park should same be conveyed to Roanoke County or other governmental unit for such purpose. No building or structure shall be constructed within 100' in elevation from the visible ridge line. Si na e — No signage is proposed for the tower aside from those pertaining to human safety as required by the FCC. Community Meeting. A community meeting was held on February 15th at Bonsack Elementary School to discuss this project with the citizens. Eighteen citizens attended and representatives from the County and WVWA present to answer questions about the project. After County staff explained the SUP process and gave a basic overview of the project, representatives of WVWA gave a presentation explaining the upgrade of their entire communication system throughout the area and answered citizen questions and concerns. Many of the adjacent property owners were unconcerned with the tower after seeing the presentation which included photographs of the height of the tower during a previous balloon test. Questions about whether or not collocation options were evaluated were asked. The WVWA staff indicated that collocation had been a viable option for all of the project area except for this particular one. Staff representatives of the Roanoke Greenways Commission and Western Virginia Land Trust then asked about the Read Mountain preserve conservation easement and if that had been a factor in selecting the site. The representatives for WVWA were not aware of any easement on the property and requested a copy of it. There was a long discussion over the proposed color of the tower and WVWA staff were open to ideas from the citizens. WVWA staff also asked citizens if they would like to see photos from their particular addresses during another balloon test and offered to provide them. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The 2005 Comprehensive Plan indicates that the Future Land Use Designation of these parcels Conservation. Conservation is a future land use area of particular environmental sensitivity due to topography, existence of unique land characteristics, conservation /open space /greenway easements, soil types or location with respect to other State or Federally preserved lands. Typical resources would include wetlands, ridgelines, mountainsides, scenic views from the Blue Ridge Parkway and Appalachian Trail, identified greenway corridors, productive agricultural lands, historical and cultural resources and threatened or endangered species habitats. Although the proposed broadcasting tower does not strictly conform to the stated objective of the Conservation designation, its construction is proposed for a location with an existing road and water storage tank. Additionally, the proposed tower is to be constructed well below the Read Mountain ridgeline so as not affect its view. 3 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS The WVWA is requesting a Special Use Permit for a broadcasting tower located at 2857 Summit Ridge Road. The request is to allow for the WVWA to construct a 120' monopole tower with a 10' antenna on a 0.121 acre parcel zoned AG -3. The proposed development conforms to all of the existing AG -3 development regulations although does not strictly conform to the Conservation standards. If the commission choses to approve this request, staff recommends the following conditions: 1. The proposed development shall be in substantial conformance with the concept plan entitled "Western Virginia Water Authority Summit Ridge Site" dated December 23, 2011. 2. The proposed tower shall not exceed a total height of 120'. 3. No lighting shall be allowed on the broadcast tower unless required by the Federal Aviation Administration. Additional conditions could include the color of the broadcasting tower and limiting the number of antennas on the broadcasting tower. CASE NUMBER: 9- 612012 PREPARED BY: Tara Pattisall HEARING DATES: PC: 316112 BOS: 3127112 ATTACHMENTS: Application Materials Site Inspection Photographs Aerial Photograph Zoning Map Future Land Use Map AG -3 Zoning District Regulations Broadcasting Tower Use and Design Standards Durham Easement 11 Applicant Name: Western Vir inia dater Authors Consultant Staff Member: John Murphy BROADCASTING TOWERS AND ASSOCIATED ANTENNA PERMITTED BY RIGHT: New and replacement broadcasting towers and associated antenna not exceeding thirty (30) feet in height and located within any commercial or industrial zoning district provided: a) the proposed tower is a monopole type design: bj the general area of the proposed tower is currently served by above ground utilities including electric power and telephone poles: and c) all other use and design standards for the construction of the broadcasting tower and associated facilities are met. ® Antennas may be installed on any existing structure within the County provided said antenna does not meet the definition of a broadcasting tower, doles not increase the height of the existing structure more than ten (1 0) feet, and does not result in the structure and antenna exceeding the maximum structure height for that zoning district. 0 Temporary towers erected for a - period not to exceed twentv -one days. The following information shall be required as part of the Special Use Permit for a Broadcast Tower in addition to standard application requirements. Proposed Site Qualities � I I I I II 111111 III III Ii III iIIIilMirtilllli ll � Utilities that are currently present on site electricity Utilities required that are not currently present on site; Expected route of linkage. n�a Estimated noise level in decibels: 0 Broadcast Tower Structure Type: ® Monopole El Lattice Tower El Guyed Tower ❑ Stealth Design (description) ❑ other (description) direct embedded Proposed height of tower excluding antenna: ' l20 Existing height of surrounding tree canopy and/or buildings: r 30 - 75 Construction material and finish of tower: Specific tower location Material: Finish: Longitude: 0 s r Latitude: Ground Elevation in mean sea level of the proposed tower site: 1800 Tower has structural ability to accommodate: ❑ one ❑ Two ❑ Three o other providers. Types(s) of Antenna or Other Devices Attached to Tower Omni - Directional Antenna El Directional Panel ❑Parabolic Antenna ❑Whip Antenna 1:1 Other Material and finish of the proposed antenna(s). Dimensions of Antenna(s)-height/width/depth Material: fiberglass Finish: matte 120" or 10' / 2.6' dial n/a I The followin inforroation inust be subniftted se-paratel irl citheri'h vvrit(ea or inapped furniat, (o rm a ti on on how th p r po d si te rel a te s to t'he a p I i can Vs e. x ist i ii com m u ri I c at i nn ll� IT) inclLidiri fir er of other sit °ithin thekoanobs Valle and the location of the antenna at eachi si1c, TnApd esi at i n the s pe c i fi C. cc ve ra a rea(s) des i re d it an overfl ow areas d's note d separatel y A I i st, w i th a rn ap } c f a I I I he a] ternative, s ices consi detect or eva I Liated to serve I lie area 0 f th i 9p ropo se d t awer., indudin other exisfiri tower sites in the Vicinit This should include are C-0-10catiores Qons-Idered and (lie specific technical, l e i or other reasons the other Site(s) were roje-Oad. r avi do can �c ptua I s i t e p 11 a n d rawn to scal e, d epi ctin g the. I ocat i on of s up p a r! st r LiGtures, e pry, ors t enc I osure s landscaped areas,, fell-'.Os li access, H rn 49 of d 5 1 1 isturbed land, avera slope of the site, ownership and use: of adjoinin propertiO.S, `Zltc. 1:1 Provide accurate, to scale, photo sirnulations showin the relationship of the pyoposed broad casi tower and associate-d antenna to the surroundin Pbotogra phi c sim ulations should I include the relatiortsh.ips of a-i new or m o fied To ad o r ILti Ilit -cc rridors nc ces Sar to sere the prop d broadcast tower site. B i de c n in p Lit ed zed terra i n ana l sis sh owin the vii bi I y of t he pro po se d broadcast tower an d all t enlia Lit the re hti.Rht and Jocation. If ilew or modified road,, access Or utilit cari-I'dors arc proposed, the. terra in anal shall also -sb ow the visiN"ilt of these new or inodifiDd features. Provide detail street for brcadcast tower structure., Ptovide. an ac cv ra-te d esc ri pt I o n a n d Pilo logr aph o f the pr o see ( c w 1:,'r s runt ure, i n ud'i in ante -1 11 a. ' 0-t FA ro v i de detai I s heet o f any an tenna or dev ise-s att aQbed to tower incl A a el ectr - i Va and rnechanical Specifications for antens a systems. r Notes, I hereb cer if` - thaL I * All re q w'�va? s ab� a 4 1 rui.-k ; o ihi e. F.4-4, as re b Zon f g Ordinance Sec iori 30- 8 7-2D. 6. have beep. subm itled. * A re on-site balloon or comparable fesf will bepeiformed on the dates uffbr the Plannin Com Pin ission F uNic h earin s chedu led for and on she. dales Of 0 rin I- r;?e 13()Wd OfSUPErvisors PUN OC i7ca sch eduledfor f 1, ter e upplican r, shall be respo nsf'ble for 011 fees assoc ale wi the th in of 112 c appficalf'on, includin the reasonrable Ceosi q f an ipia'ependent anal deg Med neceSsary by the Couiz ro theneed the new broadcast tower., Wes tern Mr . a Wa, te'r A-u t I _t' 4 t 'q U r b Date: Januar 6, -4 2012 .,- �Z� Iacnb3� Count' Raanol-ce Communit Devel opment Flemmin Zonin 5204 Bernard- Diive, r 1-1 0 Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 For Staff Use Onl Dale Team yed. R Cdycd b I " _ JK' A p r . I ication ft*: PC-'k'."4-% �k. L FIELCAWS ISSLIM.- 130S date: Cmt Numb-cr o ALL A.PPLJCANrS Check t pe o f app I lua I iori fil I ed (Ch C Ck a I I th Lit a p I y) 0 Rezonin 13 Special I Is v 0 Variance Waiver :lAdmirnistrativeAppe-al [jCompp jAq(]5 , 2 �- 2232)Remie . w Applicants nameaddre.5,% w/zip Western Vir its ta M,:.iter !\uthorit 601 S. Jef f erson Street 'Roa,noke. Virp-inia 24011 Owne-r"s nametiad-dress w4p Sarne as applicant Propeft Lo-cation 28571 Su wit Rid Road Tax Map No.-.! 039*00-01-08.01-0000 P hon a-. Work. Cell ff: Fax No.; phon c. if W c-r- k� - ["tLx Nn� 853-57-56 853-57- 5 6 S 3 - 1 600 Nl'a District: Hollins Communit P1an:n, area: F-xisfin AG3 Site of parcr-1(5): Acres: Exislinp: Lzmd UIM.S�: i), lb I I a 11 t 11 it Y R FUGIVIArG. SPECIA L USE PEPM] T, WA -rVER A ND COMP PLA 05-2-223 RC, VIEW A, PPLICA , " T ' ( IC P Proposed,Zonin AG3 � Lh -4 special use permi L Proposed Land Use,., 1,201 broad-cast tower Does the pat E-.1 meet, the minimiam lost area "width, .11[td fronta re. of the % Yes El No U IF N0 A VARIANCL IS REQUIRED FIRST Does the parcel MCO the minim Lini criteria for the re Use T�ype� Vcc� i No IF NO A VARIANCE, IS RE fil RST If rezonin re are conditicris bein proffeTed w� rl,- tf ns re -,q VAR [A NCE4 x WAIVES ANP A D MINIS Tk4 T1 VE A PPEA L A PP[- IGA NTS � VIWIA A) V'afianc iwajverof sec tioll(s) of the R.-oanokc Count Zonia Ordinanoe in order to A ppeal 0 6 Z011 in A dministrator's de--Gision Appeal of Interprelation of Sir Hun(s): of the Roanoke Counl Zonin Ordinance ppeal of 1. nterpretab 0 F Zon in PrI ap to Ppl,,,,r . - lease chect if eLmInw,4, APPLICATION WI LIB NOT BE ACCEPT IF" .N 0 F T HESE IT S B LS SINGORINCOMP ICE TE. NICP VtAA PASAVICT VIAA PJS(WJC.P VIA4 Consultation 9 1 r-f- 11 x I I" con plain ApplIcation fee Applicatiori Mete& and mids description Proffers, if a Juscification Water and sewer application Ad priopert ow m rs I Wby semi 6e that I am either tl)c owni;r of the pr env or the invners a or curl cry purchw%fiF and am actin w ii h -N'Fw kno w] ed and corimm c4the owner, Iriv r ri I a wester Water A-lithoritv 0%1ft& S, S i Ll M b K The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2 -2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning ordinance. The proposal to set a broadcast tower on .the Authority's property at 2857 Summit Ridge will provide necessary efficiencies to the water utilities while at the same time minimizing the impact of the broadcast tower on the neighboring residential community. The western Virginia Water Authority will comply with all setback requirements and in addition the broadcast tower will be set among existing vegetation for reduction in its visibility and intrusion into the down - slope residential community along Summit Ridge Road and Coachman Drive. The broadcast tower will be 245' and 355' from the nearest two structures. The broadcast tower is not within 2 miles of the Roanoke Regional Airport, so 30- 87 -2D.6 does not apply. we contacted the FAA anyway, and learned that there would be no issue since it is under 200' and not in a flight approach path. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contain_ ed in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The water Authority has contracted with Honeywell, Inc. for the design of the proposed project and as part of the project; Honeywell, Inc. has conducted a propagation study in which it has analyzed the most efficient system for transmitting water usage data from wireless meters to a centralized billing system. The propagation study initially identified 62 potential locations in Roanoke City and in Roanoke County in order to provide the coverage necessary for the overall transmission system. The water Authority, working in collaboration with Honeywell, Inc., has narrowed the number of antennas down to 9 or 10, all but one of which will be placed on existing or planned water tanks. As a result of the propagation stud, the water Authority is seeking to install the fewest number of antennas to transmit that water usage data in the most efficient manner. This property is one of the locations. The new tank will improve water pressure and - fire flows in the area. Please describe the impacts) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water /sewer, roads, schools, parks /recreation and fire and rescue. While the broadcast tower will be visible from several of the down -slope residences, it is not going to be intrusive as it will be set among the trees and existing vegetation and the benefits of efficient delivery of water service including accurate and efficient billing will outweigh any concern due to visibility. One additional benefit is that the transmission of water meter data will be nearly instantaneous and the Water Authority will know within a very short amount of time whether or not a leak has developed in any of the individual resident's water systems and will be able to notify residents and save losses for unusually large amounts of water use caused by leaks. The elevation of the broadcast tower is 1800' while the slope behind it rises to 2060', so the ridgeline view should be protected. 3 Applicant Western Vir inia Water Authori t -CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A c ancept p [an of th e p ropos d praject m, us( be s iibmi tted w ith the appi ication. The c aurept P Ian sh al I kr cal l dep is I I h land usp , , Ghan &velopmew. or variance lbal is lo be cons id creel . Further, the plan shall address an pomnflal, land ti�c cv- d es -1 g n i ss ucs a risi ri fyorn th P, i e I n Such -cases i nvo I v i n r zon in I he app 1 kart m k y proffer coed it i on to I i wit the fu tuv� USC and d U Ve I OpMeU t Or, thf! p7ropert and b s o doi n cornet an deficien ci-es t hat ma not be mana b CU:U.11,t perm itti n L� rc T e concept plar:.s h ou I d no t b e confused w th ch a sits pl ri a o r plot p [an that is r red p r1or to the ismance -of a bu i I d I r P erm it Site plan and buildin permit procedures ensura cwu;ihance- with State and Co-ant y development re and ma rec i r-V r,han g es to ( he i n I ( i al c on ce pt p Ian. U n less I i m, iting con cl Ii t i on s are pro ffered and acc.opted in a rezon in or imp osed Oil a Sp ac i a use permit of variance, the concept plan ma be alt uie-d to the extent permitted b the zonin district and other ri ula ions , A concept plan is re %vith :ul rezonin gpeGi�l I LI S e p2wrin'll, wai vcr, cummunit plan (15.2-2232 review and variance ap p I lications. 1'he p] an s hou I d be prepared by f� 1 onal site pl anin er. 'The ever of delail I rn a var dependin g on e n W ti re Ij of the re The Col ii t ..P larl ni n. l3 v i 1si on s taff m a exern p sDme o r I he items o r su t he ad d i 6 an of axtra itens, bu L the fol lowin ate cons,id ered mi n i i u Lipp ALL AI?PLICANTS a. Applicant natneand naiii� of development b Date,, scat and north ar row c. LCA Size in acres or s feet and dini•nsions d. Lotalion, narnes of owners and Roano-ke Count tax, map numbe:r of adjolni gin g properties e. P-hys ical featums au ch as g rou-n d c ov ti, n atural vo atercourses , fl ovd a 111, rt r, f. 'Uhe zo n i n an d I an d u i of a i] ;ad acoent pro p crti c s g A I I propert 1 -1 n t-,s and easerne rat s h Alt build iffi existin and propose , and dimcn.sions, floor area and hei 1 Location , wi di h � an d names o f al I e xistin or plalted streets or of her publ'ic wa wt thi n o r adjacent to I he devel opmeat j. ID[ inn nsions and locations of all drivewa parkin spaces and loadin spaces .4ddifionai P Wn , rmw 6' e-e REZO-MbliG and SiPECIA L. USE P,&'.RiW1T A PL .4 N792V Rx i stin ul i lities (water, sewer, storm d ra Ins" an d con n ection s at 1 he S he An dri vie wa entrance&iex its :, curb openin s and crossovers rn. Topo rn .p in a,sultable soal-e and contour intervals r n. Approximate SIF1101et gFE.JC5 a n d s I to d istanc es at I 11tersGet 10 ns o, Locations of all adjaceni lire li rani s p- An proffered conditions at the sit -e and h o %v the art add rcssed q - If project is to be phascd. plleasy show pha8e schedule I certi f that al I i tem s tai u i nhl, d i n t he the ck I ist above ar u . co ni me, t A i t y Wes. te r ;%7a J Januar 6, 2-0-1-2 Si g n at Lire of .a. ii Q-an1 Date ATTACHMENTS FOR 2857 SUMMIT RIDGE ROAD 1. Photo of broadcast tower 2. Fiexnet propagation analysis (2 pages) 3. Mechanical specifications 4. Tesco broadband pole design properties 5. ROHM pole design properties (2 pages) 6. Concept Plan (3 pages) (includes computerized terrain analysis) 7. List of adjoining property owners with names, addresses (mailing addresses including zip codes) and tax map numbers. 8. Subject property description (source deed; 5 pages) 9. Check for $40 to process application (copy) 10. Plat of Section 8; La Bellevue (2 pages) *Photo simulation from balloon test — to be scheduled at a later time *Water and Seger application and plan metric maps are not applicable 3 m ry r r r ,r w _ ' , ° m i 1 � a- p � � r ,�.y4 E . _ �!. x � •�'tc��jl l r } w n y " -•e�� ^i 41 d Y +ate N -r Ta R i.rr fu Ct w ! rr- F 5 3 m ry r r r ,r FlexNet Propagation Anal v6 A IQNS.- Western Vir Water Authorit Roanoke, VA BTS Best Server Covera Bradshaw Rd E-911 Twr (Panel, 135-7 Cotton Hill Rd AEP Twr Glenvar Lower Tank La Bellevue Dr Tank Loch Haven Tank Mill Mtn —New Strawber Hill Tank Wertz Orchard AEP Twr FU Mechanical speemeat1cpns 13CD=87010 5025% L en, r,. th Overall 3393 r-irn 1 34 i rVP - '10154 C-D� r f Ida Jam m 2893 rnrn 114 in Radia 'Pon-natfamij Diameter 065 rnrn 2.6 iin WailD l-A 12 V 26-5 lbs -10 Jft -71 -qZV Wind Area 0.2 M2 2.4 Wnd lioaci at 50 rn/s 351 N 79 Antenna uonsistin of alum'nu 0$10y Ui ift so ILI 5 covered b a pNyUrgftnftpEUrted fiber "rim ra dame. Inverted modrels avjjjjab1L:k- PM Mo Lj rkfi n �4.IRI�port Plpw Adurnkiwm afjo d i ameter 070 rnrn '1141 -0 lip ,- n), ler 500 m m ( 1 9 x' in)- Haftolital '"Ourwing mAcKeT KA KJVJ120W W ndard -or. 439413001 Oftipt D�lvou',IR bracke A kft WA Electrical specifica Frequancy Ran .9*70-960 MHz 20 Irnpedu nce 6W GDnMe Ctor NF, EL 431 K 11 V:SVVR :5 1 - 43 l Ila n Poladzaton V or6ca I Vetcral G ain 1C dHj Power Ratin 500 W Hia It Power An H-Pie ne 3W E-Plarye 7D Electic-al DDwntilt 51 0 MLill Hill 25% Uphtn I ri Pmt won Direct Ground 41 TWca! Valkips I'Dwa." RaAr I im red b amr ecinr fin!�, HE in dicales MEImaaleen " CorriuAw. E-DIN Indicatm an -ml 0 DIN 00.7*010L ` The ailen na w t III j doe& not liT-lrjd:e,- the IfIlWyan NUft OWWWWCAII jm*�'cm, &M wwka Fn a 6# MMW M th cul r* U c a. 0 A lye' ftolf-rhannei L-A"SiDn running the en dire 10 noth Df the afl ten na fair r4nmalchoJ -,iren and fipidjL Durable bMS faedlimp- dv:Agn Mat c I inn lriate:s th a nvwd for ronNm rrtj�rkaj $01de" i-ainl$ 41 1h L- si al path- A nPn-z*1lirkeaF SyStaW Wth a CC L-: ever Ca&afin e ofnent for bmad hard n rid !s.tjp*6Pt p arfo rman im. 0 :fir ia5 hGu1:aA-Pn for virtualI no intDmW signal loss. C,rer A mPh@nW An antwiva J.-p vrt� &ro fdvL-- Yqj@-- AmRod Wfilmme f6t topoo. <W rW&C0frj=,V-rjL Inverted Models AvAable. 1300 C apitall Drive Rm kford , J L 0 1 1 OV Tcs11-Fr&e (88a.) 417-M2 ToL ( 87:5 ) 3ID9-0�4%1 Fax- (815) 399-015S Ernai-: anta1 VLW-k. an lint. corn PJL hen l tl, Inc. Re'-ILOOH DWe: 4V.3104 SUMMIR 3 let's Arn An Exclusive ST ( True Transmisslon Line arm MID Tec hnol'a y) % Antenna Design TESSCO Broadband 'Pole Desi Properties 120 Ft. AGL Standa-rd Tapered S d Poles Section Data . ..... . ..... ..... . ....... ....... .. . .. . ..... ......... . .. Approved B . ..... Maximum Reactions Date: Download 7.7 s. OTK fl-kips 405.5 Y. �4 72 046 Shear, kips 7.1 9 .. 1:1,5 Desi B Datc: 4/1-1/2007 /2 Cliv,cked 13y: VJ Approved B Date: Date: A070102-7B Summit 4 np O.Tf. 4 PORT ORIIEN7.4-ION 900 --- 27DO C3 -A At-. U .1 Pi Lq , i i. 4p REFERS MOE ELD/ATTON (1) INYEWML HOOK FOR POW-s thru HA 4D HO LE CDVER PLATE P14L. VL.526.2- PORT 5WES 5-1 X 711 PortT MVERS PRCOJIDED p ALL PD-In L•'6-MHT041hr.-, k2 5M" 0 HEAVY PEX NUTS t-TYI-n (�j in" 0 : m PAIIJNUTS & IN* 5HARATION CAP PLATE POLE POIE I.D. TAI-il Al1`TAriJE-L9 TES f I ". io Pcp KLT CAP PLATE' 4 7. SUCe L i t% (SEE NCITES) I . I I )ACKING LU-3 D.D. 0 GPADE (SEE NOTEf. HAC U I LL (SEE N.-.)T E 5 2 lx3pxo.375" F lu GROUNDMr. LUG LU v� f1j2"O HOLE (gyp) Aj L , 2rMwaft -= r% r,n 5AFE" CABLE Wj L 5.0 CMAX) WPFORT 8WKETS 10FTIONk-) TYPICAL C:R055 SE47-10�4 lit (SEE - WTES i V inG � REGUE Mm. Au CI TA, RUE (5 IE 5 N -JT FS) 1 S" STAG GE R M i ril SPACING MOM 20 FT -,t M N -%L (18 FT. V IN.) ABME 24 CRADE Tri 70P -c.;-- POLE STLP BOLT DE-FAIL (0 PTJdP4.ALj' .N'OT E 8 1. REFERTO ATTAC HLU POLL-' LJLsm-w JjRap F RTjES gym- FOR NUMRVR OF SEMOP45, SPUCE LENCoTH5., POLE DIMENSIONS, MIKIMUM.A.UC5R WAME-TER, AND BAC IMF] LL TYPE. 2, REFER TO SHEET 2 FOR GMNERAL N rinivu iM-el-�� stl III mit 5 1. POLE DESIGN CONFORMS TO ANSI/TIA/EIA- 222 —F. REFER TO ATTACHED POLE DESIGN PROPERTIES FOR EPA POLE CAPACITIES BASED UPON TABULATED WIND SPEEDS (Y INCH RADIAL ICE LOADING CONSIDERED FOR EACH DESIGN). DESIGN CRITERIA MUST BE VERIFIED BY OTHERS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION BASED ON SITE — SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS. 2. POLE ORIENTATION TO BE DETERMINED BY OTHERS BASED UPON SITE — SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS. 3. WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI /TIA/EIA -222 -F, STRUCTURAL STANDARDS FOR STEEL ANTENNA TOWERSAND ANTENNA SUPPORTING STRUCTURES AND WITH LOCAL CODES AND SAFETY REGULATIONS. PROCEDURES FOR THE PROTECTION OF EXCAVATIONS, EXISTING CONSTRUCTION AND UTILITIES SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, 4. CONFORMANCE WITH LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR OBSTRUCTION MARKING AND LIGHTING SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, 5. DESIGN ASSUMES THAT, AS A MINIMUM, MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION WILL BE PERFORMED OVER THE LIFE OF THE STRUCTURE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI/TIA /EIA- 222 —F. 6. EMBEDMENT DEPTH IS BASED ON ANSI /TIA /EIA- 222 —F "NORMAL" SOIL CONDITIONS. ACTUAL SITE SOIL DESIGN PARAMETERS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY OTHERS TO MEET OR EXCEED "NORMAL" SOIL DESIGN PARAMETERS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 7. REFER TO ATTACHED POLE DESIGN PROPERTIES FOR POLE DIMENSIONS, NUMBER OF SECTIONS, REQUIRED SPLICE LENGTHS AND MINIMUM AUGER DIAMETER, 8. STRUCTURAL STEEL CONFORMS TO ASTM A572 GRADE 65, HOT —DIP GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI /TIA /EIA- 222 —F. POLE SECTION PART NUMBERS ARE NUMBERED SEQUENTIALLY FROM TOP TO BOTTOM, 9. TOLERANCE ON POLE STEEL HEIGHT IS EQUAL TO PLUS 1% OR MINUS 1/2 %. 10. STEP BOLTS AND SAFETY CLIMB CABLE, WHEN SPECIFIED, START FROM 20 A.G.L. (18' MIN) TO THE TOP OF THE POLE. 11, FOR CORROSIVE GROUNDWATER AND /OR SOIL CONDITIONS, ROHN RECOMMENDS ADDITIONAL CORROSION CONTROL PROTECTION SUCH AS CONCRETE BACKFILL, ADDITIONAL PROTECTIVE COATING OVER GALVANIZING, OR THE INSTALLATION OF SACRIFICIAL ANODES. 12. ANTENNAS, MOUNTS AND TRANSMISSION LINES ARE PROVIDED BY OTHERS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, DESIGN ASSUMES ALL TRANSMISSION LINES ARE ROUTED INTERNALLY. 13, ALL GROUNDING IS SUPPLIED BY OTHERS AND MUST MEET ALL APPLICABLE CODES. 14. NONSTAINING LUBRICANT SHALL BE APPLIED TO THE SLIP JOINT SURFACES. JACKING FORCES SHALL BE APPLIED UNTIL THE MINIMUM SPLICE LENGTH IS OBTAINED AND THE JOINT IS TIGHT WITH NO GAPS GREATER THAN Y4 ". JACKING LUGS ARE PROVIDED ABOVE AND BELOW EACH SPLICE LOCATION AT 120 SEPARATIONS. 15, AGGREGATE BACKFILL, WHEN SPECIFIED (REFER TO ATTACHED POLE DESIGN PROPERTES ), SHALL BE #57 STONE OR EQUIVALENT CONFORMING TO ASTM C33 AND PLACED TO MINIMIZE VOIDS. 16. CONCRETE BACKFILL, WHEN SPECIFIED (REFER TO ATTACHED POLE DESIGN PROPERTIES), SHALL DEVELOP A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3,000 PSI IN 28 DAYS USING 1 r" MAXIMUM COARSE AGGREGATE SIZE AND SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPROPRIATE STATE REQUIREMENTS FOR EXPOSED STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, THE DURABILITY REQUIREMENTS OF ACI318 CHAPTER 4 SHALL BE SATISFIED BASED ON THE CONDITIONS EXPECTED AT THE SITE, FREE FALL CONCRETE MAY BE USED PROVIDED FALL IS VERTICAL DOWN WITHOUT HITTING SIDES OF EXCAVATION OR POLE AND DOES NOT FALL THROUGH WATER. ,_a_,lft a y � _ �rU ❑ io a 5d pp N 's G a � m m C3 CD p uf �¢- Q z 1. POLE DESIGN CONFORMS TO ANSI/TIA/EIA- 222 —F. REFER TO ATTACHED POLE DESIGN PROPERTIES FOR EPA POLE CAPACITIES BASED UPON TABULATED WIND SPEEDS (Y INCH RADIAL ICE LOADING CONSIDERED FOR EACH DESIGN). DESIGN CRITERIA MUST BE VERIFIED BY OTHERS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION BASED ON SITE — SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS. 2. POLE ORIENTATION TO BE DETERMINED BY OTHERS BASED UPON SITE — SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS. 3. WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI /TIA/EIA -222 -F, STRUCTURAL STANDARDS FOR STEEL ANTENNA TOWERSAND ANTENNA SUPPORTING STRUCTURES AND WITH LOCAL CODES AND SAFETY REGULATIONS. PROCEDURES FOR THE PROTECTION OF EXCAVATIONS, EXISTING CONSTRUCTION AND UTILITIES SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, 4. CONFORMANCE WITH LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR OBSTRUCTION MARKING AND LIGHTING SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, 5. DESIGN ASSUMES THAT, AS A MINIMUM, MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION WILL BE PERFORMED OVER THE LIFE OF THE STRUCTURE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI/TIA /EIA- 222 —F. 6. EMBEDMENT DEPTH IS BASED ON ANSI /TIA /EIA- 222 —F "NORMAL" SOIL CONDITIONS. ACTUAL SITE SOIL DESIGN PARAMETERS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY OTHERS TO MEET OR EXCEED "NORMAL" SOIL DESIGN PARAMETERS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 7. REFER TO ATTACHED POLE DESIGN PROPERTIES FOR POLE DIMENSIONS, NUMBER OF SECTIONS, REQUIRED SPLICE LENGTHS AND MINIMUM AUGER DIAMETER, 8. STRUCTURAL STEEL CONFORMS TO ASTM A572 GRADE 65, HOT —DIP GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI /TIA /EIA- 222 —F. POLE SECTION PART NUMBERS ARE NUMBERED SEQUENTIALLY FROM TOP TO BOTTOM, 9. TOLERANCE ON POLE STEEL HEIGHT IS EQUAL TO PLUS 1% OR MINUS 1/2 %. 10. STEP BOLTS AND SAFETY CLIMB CABLE, WHEN SPECIFIED, START FROM 20 A.G.L. (18' MIN) TO THE TOP OF THE POLE. 11, FOR CORROSIVE GROUNDWATER AND /OR SOIL CONDITIONS, ROHN RECOMMENDS ADDITIONAL CORROSION CONTROL PROTECTION SUCH AS CONCRETE BACKFILL, ADDITIONAL PROTECTIVE COATING OVER GALVANIZING, OR THE INSTALLATION OF SACRIFICIAL ANODES. 12. ANTENNAS, MOUNTS AND TRANSMISSION LINES ARE PROVIDED BY OTHERS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, DESIGN ASSUMES ALL TRANSMISSION LINES ARE ROUTED INTERNALLY. 13, ALL GROUNDING IS SUPPLIED BY OTHERS AND MUST MEET ALL APPLICABLE CODES. 14. NONSTAINING LUBRICANT SHALL BE APPLIED TO THE SLIP JOINT SURFACES. JACKING FORCES SHALL BE APPLIED UNTIL THE MINIMUM SPLICE LENGTH IS OBTAINED AND THE JOINT IS TIGHT WITH NO GAPS GREATER THAN Y4 ". JACKING LUGS ARE PROVIDED ABOVE AND BELOW EACH SPLICE LOCATION AT 120 SEPARATIONS. 15, AGGREGATE BACKFILL, WHEN SPECIFIED (REFER TO ATTACHED POLE DESIGN PROPERTES ), SHALL BE #57 STONE OR EQUIVALENT CONFORMING TO ASTM C33 AND PLACED TO MINIMIZE VOIDS. 16. CONCRETE BACKFILL, WHEN SPECIFIED (REFER TO ATTACHED POLE DESIGN PROPERTIES), SHALL DEVELOP A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3,000 PSI IN 28 DAYS USING 1 r" MAXIMUM COARSE AGGREGATE SIZE AND SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPROPRIATE STATE REQUIREMENTS FOR EXPOSED STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, THE DURABILITY REQUIREMENTS OF ACI318 CHAPTER 4 SHALL BE SATISFIED BASED ON THE CONDITIONS EXPECTED AT THE SITE, FREE FALL CONCRETE MAY BE USED PROVIDED FALL IS VERTICAL DOWN WITHOUT HITTING SIDES OF EXCAVATION OR POLE AND DOES NOT FALL THROUGH WATER. ,_a_,lft JO � -3DVcl 'AiiuOH-Lnv jj i3 1 is aI A baE 9 1 ° tu uu n 'K A 1(4A aPR` l m 4L T - �T- — — — . , .,. w T A IM - iL IL �7 —j wo PL� 4'0 Z, 9A `3 k - � � °. .. .. , .tea ,� 1 . •°° � Y is ` -tea,. ..... - - ° I I' - �I . r ,. t s 1 %j , ."-I' b —k p r % wa ti A ' 1 q. wr L ` • - �° '� , s 'u -, � ^� . � •,} r a -° A �. +� '� - 9 A s � ^ �� � r ar{ I � � s�."`' { I ° - �' � y p 'j t a ::,nL % p % Ku • p r , L 'II 4� • L p } , . _ _ I A' �+" 4 1 6 Lu 4t en -A % j , I %k ",-r 0 n pr, W_ J d6k Zk P6 _4f Lu LJ L9 1 7 ED " x 94 no 1% LLI ML cd LE Cr W, r r. " r 16 LC h L ip a - LL-? of LLP • L LLI amp Lu 2 1: 1 % -�, + e % if qw Fj JO — :3DVd 1 1501"b'. % ff % IL 11 LI—CZ—Zl :31V❑ NMOHS SY '-31VOS Hi IV d ivm -3ilS a0aia Anyms V I N I E) 6 1 A N � 3 Ah U01:�-OAa13 C, C� CD, C> c) C� c� C> Co CD ni .A ftj M Q C - CD C� CD g CD C-0 %-D v W = m %D -o- in -d- X e,, � .- — — -- < 0 +1 3: LLJ 0 01-11 n °o° 0 N v— Z o L 14 p= 0: r 0 LjLI EtevoLtion o N 8 9 2 S 8 E n co °' 75.0:D LOCATION OF PROPOSED NO 38' 04" W w ANTENNA/BROADCAST TOWER Lo i'0, Cfl� , EXISTING WATER STORAGE TA14K 1 O'-- 6 DIAMETER ��� � ' MIN. 15'--8"' 4H EI GPI T 2857 SUMMIT RIDGE ROAD WESTERN VIRGINIA WATER AUTHORITY TAX #039.00 -01- 08.0'1 -0000 AREA = 13,521 SF � ZONING AG3 3:: S8 23 56 cJ ° 2827 SUMMIT RIDGE ROAD FITZGERALD, x 0 (D Lr: r r� DAVID K. a TAX #0239.02-03-9.00-0000 z ZONING R1 0 SUMMIT RIDGE F40AD Q� ROANOKE COUNTf BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TAX# 039.00 -- 01- 08.00 O000 ZONING A.:G3 fl 0 +� y L =94.152, R=437-500 _.�.____. --•- -- co 2837 SIJMMI 'RIDGE ROAD � 12 . 3303 C FITZGERALD, DAVID K. T A XI39,02 -03-- 10.00 - -04G0 ZONING R1 81.488, R=437.500 — �� �= 10.F891 �� �`�— L= 155.55'z R=387.500 } A 50' WIDE ACCESS & 'UTILIT`i —� EASEM0 2851 SUMMIT RIDG � I �GE �2OA0 � FITZGERALD, DAVID K. r TAXI 039.02 - 03• - 11. - 00DO -- F - ZaNINC R1 2865 SUMV5T RIDGE ROAD RICE, PAU:' JACKSON JR. c�C to RICE, SANDRA MAR. - TAX 039-02-03-12.00-10000 � ZON A G R1 �'• �'- ', - n CC, ,� ,-- ot ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS OF 2857 SIJMIMIT RIDGE ROAD Owner Dame: Property Address: Owner Address: Tax Map Number: Current Zoning: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 0 Summit Ridge Road P.O. Box 29500 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 039.00-01-08.00-0000 AG3 Owner Dame: Roger L. Brown & Susan D. Brown Property Address: 2875 Summit Ridge Road Owner Address: 2575 Summit Ridge Road Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Tax Map Dumber: 039.02-03-13.00-0000 Current zoning: RI Owner Name: Property Address: Owner Address: Tax Map Number: Current Zoning: Paul Jackson Rice, Jr. & Sandra Martin Rice 2865 Summit Ridge Road 2865 Summit Ridge Road Roanoke, Virginia 24012 039.02-03-12.00.0000 R1 Owner Name: David R. Fitzgerald Property Address: 2851 Summit Ridge Road Owner Address: 2837 Summit Ridge Road Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Tax Map Number: 039.02-03-11.00-0000 Current Zoning: R1 Owner Dame: Property Address: Owner Address: Tax Map Number: Current Zoning: David K. Fitzgerald 2837 Summit Ridge Road 2837 Summit Ridge Road Roanoke, Virginia 24012 039.02-03-10.00-0000 R1 Owner Name: David K. Fitzgerald Property Address: 2827 Summit Ridge Road Owner Address: 2837 Summit Ridge Road Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Tax Map Number: 039.02 -03- 09.00 -0000 Current Zoning: R1 Summit 7 Printed On 12130 /2011 By GLENN FELDMANN Prepared by: Glcim, FeIdtnwin, Darby & GoodIatte R a. Box 2887 Roanoke, Vir 24001 Exemption claimed; Grantor and Grantee are exempted from recordation taxes and fees pursua11t to §58.1- 811(A)(3) and §58.1-811 (C)(5) Code of Virginia- v 0 W a r C3 Q 13 G TF1IS DEED, made and entered into this the W4 day of k 8A'6qt 200 k � �7 by and between CLARENCE B. TESTER and CHARLES H. GSTERFIOUDT surviving Directors and Trustees in dissolution of Wilclare Corporation, Grantors, and WESTERN VIRGINIA WATER AUTHORtT'Y Grantee. WITNES SETH THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) cash in hand paid by Grantee unto Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, Grantor does hereby bargain, sell, grant and convey with General Warranty and English Covenants of Title unto Grantee, all of the following lot or parcel of land lying and being in the County of Roanoke, Commonwealth of Virginia, and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at Corner 91, said point being the northeasterly comer of Lot 15, Section 8, LaBellevue (not recorded), said point also located an the northwesterly portion of a 50 foot utility and road easement as designated within the unrecorded Section S, LaBellevue; thence leaving Lot 15 and with 6 new division lines through the property of Wilclare Corporation (D.B. 968, Pg. 562) as follows: thence with a curve to the right which said curve is defined by a delta angle of I2 19' 50 ", a radius of 437.50 feet, an arch length of 94.15 feet, a chord of 93.97 feet and bearing N 06° 45' 59" W to Corner 92; thence N 00' 36' 04" W 125.00 feet to Corner 93; thence S 89° 23' 56" W 25.00 feet to Corner #4; thence N 00° 36' 04'' W 70.00 feet to Corner #5; thence N 89° 23' 56" E, 75.00 feet to Corner 46; thence S 00° 36' 04" E, 173.30 feet to Corner 97, said point located on the Tsx 10ap Number 0391A)t O1 08.01.000 PG 0460 'tom DEC, 28 A:D northerly boundary of Section 8, LaBellevue (not recorded), being Lot 17, said point also being the northeasterly corner of the 54 foot utility and road easement designated through Section 8, LaBellevue; thence with Lot 17 and the norther] terminus of said 50 foot utility and road easement through Section 8, LaBellevue (unrecorded), S. 18 31 00" W, 12 1.84 feet to Corner #1, the lace of BEGINNING and more particularly shown on plat prepared b 1? Lumsden a Associates, P.C., dated December 18 19 8 y Buford T. 1. Summit 8 Printed On 1WO12011 By GLENN FELDMANN pC� o,497 ' DEC 28 14 -ti 3 northerly boundary of Section 8, LaBellevue (not recorded), being, Lot 17, said paint also being the northeasterly corner of the 50 foot utility and road easement designated through Section 8, LaBelle thence with Lot 17 and the northerly terminus of said 50 foot utility and road easement through Section 8, LaBellevue (unrecorded), S. 1 8 0 31' 00" W 121 feet to Corner 91, the place of BEGfNNING and more particularly shown on plat prepared by Buford T. Lumsden and Associates, P-C., dated December 18, 1981. TOGETHER WITH a 50 foot utility & road easement dedicated to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by Wilelare Corporation shown on Plat Book 9 at page 260. BEING part of the same property conveyed unto Wilclare Corporation by deed from G. L. Cummings, et ux, dated March 21, 1973 and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 968, page 562. This conveyance is made subject, however, to all easements, restrictions and covenants of record that affect the property just hereinabove described. WITNESS the following signature and seal: (SEAL) Clarence B. Tester Director and Trustee in dissolution of Wilclare Corporation L) Charles H. Osterhoudt Director and Trustee in dissolution of Wilclare Corporation pig 04E l 'f(, DEC 9 14: 13 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. 0tik. -3�Ik of DA ,NI 0c Lk"�> , to -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ; day of W) 200_, by Clarence B. Tester, Surviving Director and Trustee in dissolution of Wilelare Corporation, Grantor. Printed On 1WO201 i By GLENN FELDMANN PG (AE-1 'CE DEC 28 14:2 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA L to -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ? day of 200k by Clarence B. Tester, Surviving Director and Trustee in dissolution of Wilclare Corporation, Grantor. Notary Public holy Commission Expires: ' . �I -- 1 � o - 1 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA A of () n 0 - J to �v it. Th e /Oregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 200 by Charles H. Osterhoudt, Survivin g Director and rustee in dissolution of Wilclare Corporation, Grantor. "4z.1 Notary Public My Commission Expires: -)-OF rrin[sc1 Un 1Z00/201 1 By GLENN FELDMANN PG 0462 "C, , [CC 28 14.13 Or �r 1 Lod G sE �A .y Al -:z_ �., �'� � � Q �AAle j b I{ , v 06 r- .r- X GAR VE N/ �M T fir-' � ! V _�•�'. a5 R 10[ 6 i 4 T = a= " Q= cx = Gyg. _ GO r 16 70, 9d' l�,f, 51 d 10 1 0 16 4. $0 WILCLARE CORPORATION ! ROANOKE COUNTY, V I R G I N I A L► r ! A, q7' r► /V � 11 Or �r 1 Lod G sE �A .y Al -:z_ �., �'� � � Q �AAle j b I{ , v 06 r- .r- X GAR VE N/ �M T fir-' � ! V _�•�'. a5 R 10[ 6 i 4 T = a= " Q= cx = Gyg. _ GO r 16 70, 9d' l�,f, 51 PLAT SHOWING STORAGE TANK LOT & ACCESS EASEMENT BEING GRANTED TO BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA d 10 1 0 16 4. $0 WILCLARE CORPORATION ! ROANOKE COUNTY, V I R G I N I A — 9147' GPI . N /9`4' �5 r 'l Y PLAT SHOWING STORAGE TANK LOT & ACCESS EASEMENT BEING GRANTED TO BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA comet, 7f - 189 WILCLARE CORPORATION ROANOKE COUNTY, V I R G I N I A SCALE: I —= 54' DATE: 18 DEC. 1981 { c'' �`: / ; , • ; tr t' E ;c BUfORD T. LUMSGEN It ASSOCIATES, P. C. CERTIFIED LAND SURVEYORS kdAWOKE, VIR43INIA comet, 7f - 189 Printed On 12/30/2011 B GLENN FELDMANAt PC, 0463 '06 DEC 26 14,'13 INSTRUMENT #200621158 RECORDED IN THE CLERKS OFFICE OF x 7 0ANOKE COUNTY ON DECEMBER 28y 2006 AT 02 130M 14CGRA143 CLERK RECORDED BY: FRS, 01 Itu lu n s I w I MMIMI } z t �s f i ` f f I 3 i � f i 1 { t .f Y a t Vim€ t NOW ' e3it i = mow HZ 1 �s' w 5 x i 7■ _ m w n.Aaa P Gr =°NS AMN.� Ar a ff OK ���� ����� � � � � i3 _ ;•� � - . Ot a a a - 45 at ` M IS Wi :•� �r� l� � � mow# � �-�'# �.# .���t[ �# - ' �. .�r . M R� 0- all ■'# M y is i`` A I f a�y Zu iYs� P9 B # ., # Z1 s aw zw 4o _ r a -a I .� wr !t ';R r+.�i� �.� all ;F ��� • ZE �s # I N Z I l U _ is r g M E all Eli =_ 4 4 4 o ; C c ## t art t_ =tss ..�wtt�as:. is W w CE 4W � Ijw_g G %F 'call O� Z im. s aw ri IE jg Egg ►r 41 ■nww wpm; #_1 al..` ..''. I 1N r M r w !7 ■ k R 1R t R / ► ■ ! R ■ • ■ ■ a i R ■ ■ ■ i f -! k � f ■ - ' *"` M - a'$ a ss '' isl #��a��C�i�CSS #��i�E�iSwr�►�wpw� - � M �+ 'iHMM on w MMMmMM won MiiM ikNMRMM= - M O 'ti��►ON� ��� ir M- M i.�MOMw� ~"`�. - _- _ ..i,�. - � ° w N� + M. tI C '$�gr.�+`�wi■SSr ° +�r� i ;! �g #C ° r■i stir w yp �+►�.:_ w �.' 't+ � � � Spwypi�y�ap��.���,j�¢p��.w. n�. ■ � � r • _'t ~ �' , z� - - ■C TS ��pp a� 1■■p _ A r � - .� V K Ali■�pA..�Ww���i Y ir��Malf7 - �Y a R lK i �r �M .•T . ... �, 88R88888g8 «,�.:: :. .0 to ev e+ y V1W } - 1A Ki KI �A I[iN••�•w.. . .. Wf[1 iAfOp L.�. � - i •� a erwr.a n�e���it.l+�°:°:w�r'r r w �i►pfA■RYiM ri s R k R i ■ ■ s i s ! = �'r.�w.M$�17�Yj �W�.Mr - � F. > =■wi.' an �• � w M M k n'e.e d ■ M . �_ ► ~ ��jj �p p pp it iR %+ in AA iR is i ``i� s is w w a. - ^' •, '' �Maf IA �p SSO wan■■ son iY Rl li�w� R '�� ,�,- r.� � ._ _ I w�•;� Vii. 1 "ti• !11151 if ,pC7 0462 1, 06 DEC 2el 14-.13 A 01 0 OF O:i= � rA AW 1 . �a � *LOT �i� 00,0 �� ,y.��i.; it Rt + ( go of 7$,, 8d' -79 A7. �0` 4 �'"� �J . �� ! if 40 4. ofg 'f 04 for A, ,.� Nor � cap � 1 0 t 7' a419VC- IV, "" ( Z Or /00 016,07 43 7 5'0 ,4 81 47' o f i. W. �� " C , 4 . N 19 */9 1 � ", ky PLAT SHOWING STORAGE TANK LOT & ACCESS EASEMENT BEING UARTED TO BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA BY 1?.Ofq r 7 w 4 f% , oq ?7 A i!F " A �a � *LOT �i� 00,0 �� ,y.��i.; it Rt + ( go of 7$,, 8d' -79 A7. �0` 4 �'"� �J . �� ! if 40 4. ofg 'f 04 for A, ,.� Nor � cap � 1 0 t 7' a419VC- IV, "" ( Z Or /00 016,07 43 7 5'0 ,4 81 47' o f i. W. �� " C , 4 . N 19 */9 1 � ", ky PLAT SHOWING STORAGE TANK LOT & ACCESS EASEMENT BEING UARTED TO BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA BY WILCLARE CORPORATION ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SC.M-E.- I" — 501 DATE: 18 DEC. 198 1 13UFORD T. LUMSCHBO & ASSCXNATES, p. m CERTIFIET) LAND SURVEYORS ROAMOKF., vmwmA COMM. 70.nfl j J, F ft A .40 i WILCLARE CORPORATION ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SC.M-E.- I" — 501 DATE: 18 DEC. 198 1 13UFORD T. LUMSCHBO & ASSCXNATES, p. m CERTIFIET) LAND SURVEYORS ROAMOKF., vmwmA COMM. 70.nfl �z 11240 il-I ZU B� 2% lip X%; a T lo r L- d j 1! L : j. �/ \ 3 � ��� �^ �� � ` � � � ^� � � \' \ \� :: � ^��` \� :,/ \ 2, Plr am F - " • n W JAL4 W� 44 j v a } _ ' i rl 'F� e q r rz R�� � mRn , . . . � • �w � • � •.: °1h a •� � • ,. P� � � "� d µ , f -1P 0 m _ W s ,°_ � Vv a a 5 ajJa rL •� a n 1 v Q b w� dam 1 _ , . „ E a ®■ a y tl - 9L l� r � � a4 E ,� . , a � 1 T ice' � 'R' • _ .. . ILL e d d u �� ■�� AV Xi a di • E E• °ti i - r� _. a °� � I. -'� �' • u '� ' R�°i� � r � � v a - a. 4 u °T Na vx a , a ,u x fir � 1 r u� u - y - d Y� •Ii= �: .! - • ,r „ - a I i Ivi a s_ W . � e , •: i e e °� a �i a [nlii. ?7.. .. � � • Y� i!.,"'nL?i Y� I. I y i r I R dy .Adabim 1 am �,. � � � : � | \ \ -\ .. . , | \\ / \� r. .. . ® � � � : � | \ \ -\ .. . , | \\ / 5 ����� � � � �� -`���� R� '��� � �1 � r�b Roanoke County Department of Community Development Applicants Name: N Existing Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Tax Map Number: Magisterial District: Western Virginia water Authority A G3 AG3S 039.00 -01 -08.01 -0000 Hollins Area: 0.121 Acres 10 January, 2012 Scale: 1 " = 100' Land Use Neighborhood Conservation Development Suburban Village Village Center Rural Village Rural Preserve - Conservation Transition ■ Core Economic Opportunity - Pricipal Industrial Un iversity Roanoke County Department of Community Development Applicants Name: Western Virginia water Authority N Existing Zoning: A G3 Proposed Zoning: AG3S Tax Map Number: 039.00 -01 -08.01 -0000 Magisterial District: Hollins Area: 0.121 Acres 10 January, 2012 Scale: 1 " = 100' SEC. 30 -32. - AG -3 AGRICULTURAL /RURAL PRESERVE DISTRICT. Sec. 30 -32 -1. - Purpose. (A) The AG -3, agricultural /rural preserve district consists of land primarily used as farmland, woodlands, and widely scattered residential development located within the rural service area. Also found in these areas are lands with steep slopes, and groundwater recharge areas. Many of the county's unique natural and scenic resources are found in this district. The purpose of this district is to maintain these areas essentially in their rural state, and attempt to protect sensitive and unique land resources from degradation as recommended in the rural preserve land use category of the comprehensive plan. This may be accomplished by maintaining the existing agricultural lands and preventing the encroachment of incompatible land uses. Non -farm residents should recognize that they are located in an agricultural environment where the right -to -farm has been established as county policy. This district is also intended to minimize the demand for unanticipated public improvements and services, such as public sewer and water, by reducing development densities and discouraging large scale development. (Ord. No. 042799 -11, § 1f., 4- 27 -99; Ord. No. 042208 -16, § 1, 4- 22 -08) Sec. 30 -32 -2. - Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk ( *) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Agricultural and Forestry Uses Agriculture Farm Employee Housing Forestry Operations Stable, Private * Stable, Commercial Wayside Stand * 2. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment * Home Occupation, Type II Manufactured Home * Manufactured Home, Accessory Manufactured Home, Emergency Multiple Dog Permit * Residential Human Care Facility Single - Family Dwelling, Detached Temporary portable storage containers* 3. Civic Uses Community Recreation Family Day Care Home Park and Ride Facility * Public Parks and Recreational Areas Safety Services * Utility Services, Minor 4. Commercial Uses Agricultural Services Bed and Breakfast * Kennel, Commercial * Veterinary Hospital /Clinic 5. Industrial Uses Custom Manufacturing 6. Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower Wind Energy System, Small* (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30 -19. An asterisk ( *) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Agricultural Uses Commercial Feedlots 1.5. Residential Uses Alternative Discharging Sewage Systems 2. Civic Uses Camps * Cemetery Correctional Facilities Day Care Center * Religious Assembly* Utility Services, Major 3. Commercial Uses Campgrounds 4. Industrial Uses Composting * Landfill, Construction Debris Landfill, Rubble * Landfill, Sanitary* Resource Extraction 5. Miscellaneous Uses Aviation Facilities, Private Broadcasting Tower Outdoor Gatherings Shooting Range, Outdoor (Ord. No. 42793 -20, § II, 4- 27 -93; Ord. No. 62293 -12, § 8, 6- 22 -93; Ord. No. 82493 -8, § 2, 8- 24 -93; Ord. No. 42694 -12, § 7, 4- 26 -94; Ord. No. 62795 -10, 6- 27 -95; Ord. No. 042799 -11, § 2, 4- 27 -99; Ord. No. 072605 -7, § 1, 7- 26 -05; Ord. No. 042208 -16, § 1, 4- 22 -08; Ord. No. 052609 -22, § 1 5- 26 -09; Ord. No. 030811 -1, § 1, 3 -8 -11) Sec. 30 -32 -3. - Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. (A) Minimum lot requirements. 1. All lots, regardless of sewer and water provisions: a. Area: 3 acres (130,680 square feet). b. Frontage: 200 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. C. Maximum width to depth ratio: 1 to 5 (W to D) on streets in existence prior to the adoption of this ordinance. (B) Minimum setback requirements. 1. Front yard: a. Principal structures: 50 feet. b. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line. 2. Side yard: a. Principal structures: 25 feet. b. Accessory structures: 25 feet behind front building line or 10 feet behind rear building line. 3. Rear yard: a. Principal structures: 35 feet. b. Accessory structures: 10 feet. 4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. 5. Where the principal structure is more than 150 feet from the street, accessory buildings may be located 150 feet from the street and 25 feet from any side property line. (C) Maximum height of structures. 1. All structures: 45 feet. (D) Maximum coverage. 1. Building coverage: 5 percent of the total lot area. 2. Lot coverage: 20 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 62293 -12, § 10, 6- 22 -93) Sec. 30 -87 -2. - Broadcasting Tower. (A) Intent: The intent of these provisions is to regulate the placement of new and replacement broadcasting towers within Roanoke County. These provisions provide broadcasting tower applicants, property owners, and all other Roanoke County citizens clear guidance on the official policies and standards of the County. These policies and standards shall be used by applicants as a guide when selecting alternative broadcasting tower sites and broadcasting tower designs within the county. In addition, the county staff, planning commission and board of supervisors shall use these policies and standards, the Roanoke County community plan and the general special use permit criteria found in section 30 -19 as a guide for evaluating any future requests for broadcasting towers. In the interest of preserving and enhancing the scenic and natural beauty of Roanoke County it is the goal of the county to achieve a long term reduction in the number of broadcasting towers within the county, and where possible, to achieve a reduction in the height of existing broadcasting towers throughout the county, with special emphasis on towers located along or near the ridgetops of major mountains and land forms. In addition, it is the goal of the county, where possible, to achieve the relocation of existing broadcasting towers and associated utility and access corridors which have a high visual impact on scenic resources. To this end, the county will work cooperatively with broadcasting tower owners and applicants and land owners to achieve these goals. It is the official policy of the county to encourage and promote the collocation of antennas on existing public and private structures within the county. To achieve this end, the county encourages all wireless communication providers to locate new antennas on existing structures. Permits for new broadcasting towers should only be requested when no other reasonable alternative exists for locating needed antennas. When new broadcasting towers are proposed as a last alternative, the requested broadcasting tower location, height and design should be chosen to protect and enhance the scenic and natural beauty of Roanoke County. Broadcasting tower locations at elevations lower than surrounding ridge lines are preferred. The use of stealth designs should be considered for any new broadcasting tower. It is the intent of the county to fully comply with all of the applicable provisions of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 and other applicable federal and state laws as said laws address and preserve Roanoke County's zoning authority and provide to the communication industry the right and responsibility to provide communication services within their service areas. (B) Applicability: 1. These standards shall apply to all new and replacement broadcasting towers within Roanoke County with the exception that new and replacement broadcasting towers and associated antenna not exceeding thirty (30) feet in height and located within any commercial or industrial zoning district shall be permitted by right provided: a. The proposed tower is a monopole type design; b. The general area of the proposed tower is currently served by above ground utilities including electric power and telephone poles; and C. All other use and design standards for the construction of the broadcasting tower and associated facilities are met. 2. No modification to increase the height, size, type or location of any existing broadcasting tower or associated facilities, excluding antennas, shall be made unless such modification results in the full compliance of the broadcasting tower and facilities with all of the requirements of this ordinance. 3. Antennas may be installed on any existing structure within the county, without the necessity of obtaining a special use permit, provided said antenna does not meet the definition of a broadcasting tower, does not increase the height of the existing structure more than ten (10) feet, and does not result in the structure and antenna exceeding the maximum structure height for that zoning district. 4. These provisions shall not apply to any temporary broadcasting tower erected for the purpose of system design or testing provided the temporary broadcasting tower is erected for a period not to exceed twenty -one (21) days. In addition, in declared local emergency situations, the county administrator shall be authorized to allow the temporary installation of a broadcasting tower for the duration of the local emergency. A zoning permit pursuant to section 30 -9 of this ordinance shall be applied for and approved prior to erecting any temporary or emergency tower. (C) Application requirements: 1. All potential applicants for broadcasting towers shall consult with county planning staff at least thirty (30) days prior to submitting an application for a proposed broadcasting tower. During this consultation the applicant shall present information to the staff on system objectives, proposed coverage areas, and alternative sites considered and rejected. The staff shall provide the potential applicant information on Roanoke County policies and standards for broadcasting towers, and shall discuss with the applicant possible alternatives to broadcasting tower construction. 2. In addition to the application requirements contained in section 30 -19 -2 of this ordinance, all applicants for broadcasting towers shall provide the following at the time of application: a. The location of all other proposed broadcasting tower sites considered and rejected, and the specific technical, legal or other reasons for the rejection. b. The location of all other possible collocation sites considered and rejected, and the specific technical, legal or other reasons for the rejection. C. Accurate, to scale, photographic simulations showing the relationship of the proposed broadcasting tower and associated antenna to the surroundings. Photographic simulations shall also be prepared showing the relationship of any new or modified road, access or utility corridors constructed or modified to serve the proposed broadcasting tower site. The number of simulations and the perspectives from which they are prepared, shall be established with the staff at the consultation required in section C.I. above. d. A computerized terrain analysis showing the visibility of the proposed broadcasting tower and antenna at the requested height and location. If new or modified road, access or utility corridors are proposed, the terrain analysis shall also show the visibility of these new or modified features. e. Information on how the proposed site relates to the applicants existing communication system, including number of other sites within the Roanoke Valley, and the location of the antenna at each site. f. All broadcasting tower applicants shall be required, at their expense to conduct an on -site "balloon" or comparable test prior to the planning commission and board of supervisors hearings on the special use permit. The purpose of this test shall be to demonstrate the potential visual impact of the proposed tower. The dates and periods of these tests shall be established with the applicant at the pre - application consultation. g. Written verification that all required submittals to the FAA as required by section 30- 87 -2(D)6 of this ordinance have been submitted. 3. The applicant shall be responsible for all fees associated with the filing of the application including the reasonable cost of any independent analysis deemed necessary by the county to verify the need for the new broadcasting tower. The board of supervisors shall establish these fees, which shall be discussed with the applicant at the pre - application conference. (D) General standards: 1. The maximum height of any proposed broadcasting tower and associated antenna shall be made as a condition of the special use permit, but in no case shall any broadcasting tower and antenna exceed one hundred ninety -nine (199) feet in height. Applicants shall request the lowest broadcasting tower and antenna height necessary to accomplish their specific communication objectives. 2. The setback for any proposed broadcasting tower shall, at a minimum, conform to the requirements for principal structures for the proposed zoning district. However, in no case shall the minimum setback from the base of the broadcasting tower to any residential structure on an adjoining lot be less than forty (40) percent of the height of the tower, measured from the closest structural member of the broadcasting tower (excluding guy lines). Guy lines shall be exempt from the minimum setback requirements in side and rear yards for the respective zoning district, but shall comply with the setback requirements for the front yard. 3. The minimum setback from any property line abutting a road right -of -way for any other building or structure associated with a broadcasting tower shall be fifty (50) feet. Such buildings or structures shall be located a minimum of twenty -five (25) feet from any other property line. 4. More than one (1) broadcasting tower shall be permitted on a lot provided all applicable requirements have been met including setback requirements. 5. Broadcasting towers shall not be illuminated with any type of lighting apparatus, unless such lighting is a requirement of the FAA or FCC. When lighting is proposed to conform to federal requirement, the county shall contact the federal agency to verify the necessity of lighting, and to determine the minimal amount and type of lighting necessary to comply with federal guidelines. Security lighting, or a "down lighting" design may be installed on buildings and structures associated with a broadcasting tower. In no case shall any lighting violate section 30 -94 of this ordinance. 6. Any proposed broadcasting tower within two (2) miles from any general or commercial airport or located at a ground elevation at or above two thousand (2,000) feet, average mean sea level, shall be referred to the appropriate regional office of the FAA for review and comment prior to filing an application for a special use permit. 7. All broadcasting towers shall comply with any additional requirements established in the airport overlay district in section 30 -72 of this ordinance, and the emergency communications overlay district in section 30 -73 8. Any broadcasting tower approved shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading, and the site approved shall be sized to accommodate the additional equipment necessary for at least three (3) other vendors /providers of communications services in order to minimize the proliferation of new broadcasting towers in the vicinity of the requested site. In addition, by applying and being granted the special use permit, the applicant and the owner of the land agree to make the broadcasting tower and tower site available for additional leases within the structural capacity of the broadcasting tower and at reasonable costs adequate to recover the capital, operating and maintenance costs of the broadcasting tower location required for the additional capacity. 9. A monopole broadcasting tower design is recommended. The board may approve an alternative broadcasting tower design if it finds that an alternative type of structure has less of a visual impact on the surrounding community and Roanoke County, and /or based upon accepted technical and engineering data a monopole design is not technically feasible. Cost shall not be a criteria for determining broadcasting tower design. 10. No broadcasting towers shall be permitted within the critical viewsheds of the Blue Ridge Parkway or Appalachian Trail as shown on any official map designating these viewsheds and pre- approved by the board of supervisors. In addition, no towers shall be proposed within any other designated area of local scenic, historical, ecological and cultural importance as designated and approved by the board of supervisors prior to the filing of a tower application. 11. By applying and being granted the special use permit, the applicant and the owner of the land agree to dismantle and remove the broadcasting tower and associated facilities from the site within ninety days of the broadcasting tower no longer being use for wireless communications. Dismantling and removal from the site shall only be required after notice by the County. If antennas on any approved tower are relocated to a lower elevation, the tower shall be shortened to the height of the highest antenna. A bond or similar performance guarantee may be required as part of the special use permit approval. Said guarantee will be in an amount sufficient to ensure removal of the tower and all associated facilities and the reclamation of the property and road, access and utility corridors to a condition that existed prior to tower construction. 12. All broadcasting tower structures and associated hardware, antennas, and facilities shall be a flat matted finish so as to reduce visibility and light reflection unless otherwise required by the FCC or FAA. 13. No business signs shall be allowed on the property identifying the name of, or services offered by, any business associated with the broadcasting tower. (E) General review policies: All special use permit requests for new broadcasting towers, including the replacement or modification of existing broadcasting towers shall be reviewed by the staff, planning commission and board of supervisors on the basis of the following criteria: 1. The extent to which the broadcasting tower proposal conforms to the general special use permit criteria in section 30- 19 of this ordinance, and the intent, application requirements, and general standards for broadcasting towers found in these provisions. 2. The demonstrated willingness of the applicant to evaluate collocation opportunities within the proposed communication service area, and the demonstrated history of the applicant choosing collocation sites within the Roanoke Valley. 3. The base and top elevation of the proposed broadcasting tower relative to surrounding natural land forms. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, broadcasting tower locations below surrounding ridge lines are preferred. 4. Broadcasting tower locations already served by existing roads and utilities are preferred due to the potential detrimental environmental and visual impacts resulting from the construction of new road and utility corridors. 5. Within the needed service area, the availability of other existing structures that are, based upon independent analysis, of suitable height, design, and location for the needed antenna. 6. The visibility of the broadcasting tower from the surrounding community and neighborhood compatibility of the tower as determined by the submitted computer simulations, terrain analysis and balloon or comparable test. 7. The degree to which the proposed tower location, site design and facilities including fencing, buildings and other ground mounted equipment and new or modified road, access or utility corridors are located, designed and constructed to be compatible with the neighborhood. (Ord. No. 82493 -8, § 4 8- 24 -93; Ord. No. 102798 -12, § 1, 10- 27 -98) t 05.16- "02 DEC (13 1346 200 Document Prepared B MARTIN, HOPKINS & LEMON P.ci P. 0. Box 13366 Roanoke, Vir 24033-3366 NOTE: This Deed is exempt froni recordatioii tax pursuant to the provisions of Para (A)(3), (C and ( D ) of Section 58,1-811 and 10. 1-1 803 of the Code of Vir of 1950, as amended. TAX MAP NO: 039,00-01-08 04" THIS DEED OF GIFT EASEMENT, made this a da of November, 2002, by and between ALFRED A. DL and BETH S. DLTRHAM, husband and wife, herein collectivel called the Graaitors and WESTERN VIRGINIA LAND TRUST, a Vir non-stock corporation, hereinafter "WVLT," who address is P.O. Box IS 102 . Roanoke, Vir 24014-0797, Grantee. W I T N E S S E T H YMEREAS, the V i r Consevv-ation Easement Act, § 10.1 -1 009, et. se of the Mar-tin., Hopkins & Lenion, P.C. Code of Vir (1950), as amended, contemplates the creation of nonpossessor i . ntcrests m real estate b the Grantee for the purpose of maintainin or enhancin water q ualit y and open space lands; and WHER-EAS, the Open Space land Act of 1 966 , (Chapter 17, Title 10. 1 , ti on 10.1- 1700 to 10.1 -1 705 of the Code of Vir of 1 950, . as amended (the "Code of Vir declares that the preser-%,7ation of open-space, land serves a public purpose b promotin the health and welfare of the citizens of the Commonwealth b curbin urban sprawl and encoura more desirable and economical development of natural resources, and authorizes the use of easements in g ross to maintain the character of open-space land and W H EREAS, the h er nafter described propert is forested open space and the Roanoke Count 1998 Communit Plan contains g oals to preserve and improve the 1 .1 01 k 10517 "02 IEC W 1316 q ualit y of the Count soil, water, air, forest and farm land and specificall with Martin, Hopkins & I'mon, P.C. re to the forests, to identif uni woodland habitat and forest areas, and continue and improve the e ffectiveness of public polic incentives for its preservation and conservation; and WHEREAS, I the hereinafter described propert is, withi'n the vi cw shed of the Blue Rid Parkwa and the Roanoke Count 1998 Communit Plan includes a g oal with respect to the Blue Rid Parkwa and that the Count will protect to the extent i ble the view sheds from the B1 e Rid and poss WHEREAS, a conservation casement on the Propert hereinafter described would support the g oals of the Roanoke Count 19-98 Communit Plan and WHEREAS, the Western Vir Land Trust is established as a nonprofit entit tinder Section 501(c)(3) of the IRS Code which has been in existence in excess of five y ears and whose mission includes consen-ration of rural lands in Southwest Virorinia, WHEREAS, the Grantors are the fee simple owners of the reat propert hereinafter described which the desire preserved as open-space land in 'the public interest.. NOW THEREFORE, in reco of the fore and in consideration of the M utual covenants herein and the acceptance b Grantee, the Grantors do hereb g rant and conve to the Grantee an open-space easement. in g ross over, and the ri in .0 %.." perpetuit to restrict the use of the real estate located in Roanoke Count Vir and bein as more particularl described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and b this reference made a part hereof 2 le �L 13116 PEC AND SUBJECT,, HOWEVER, to the restriction that the Grantee or its successors and assi ma not transfer or conve the open-space easement herein conve unless the Grantee conditions such transfer or conve on the re that ( 1 ) all restrictions and conservation purposes set forth in the conve accomplished b this Deed are to be continued in perpetuit and (2) the transferee is an or then q ualif y i.11 9 as an eli donee as defined b Section 1.70 of the IRS Code and the applicable Treasur re promul thereunder. S1 , C ,_t A- 1 11 V L , d t wh ich m a affect the y T h i s conve anc e i's further made rnaters of record t Propert Restrictions are hereb imposed on uses of the Propert pursuant to the public policies set forth above. The acts which the Grantors, their heirs,, successors, personal representatives and assi covenant to do and not to do upon the Propert and the restrictions which the Grantee is hereb entitled to enforce, are and shall be as follows: 1. Accumulation of trash, refuse 7 j unk, or an other unsi material is not permitted on the Property 2. Displa of billboards, si or other adverttsen-cents is not permitted on or over the Propert except for "No Trespassin or Huntin si which ma be displa at the boundaries of the Propert 3.. Division or SubdIv,ision of the Propert in an manner is prohibited. 4. Mana of forest resources shall be in accord with a forest stewardship plan approved b the Grantee. All forestr activities shal.1 be cars -led out so as to maintain biodiversit and preserve the environmental/scenic q ualit y of the area. Best Mana Practices, as defined b the Vir Department of Forestr shall be used to control erosion and protect water q ualit y . A forested buffer of thirt feet minimum shall be maintained alon iVen-nittent and perennial streams, selective harvest in the buffer of dead or diseased trees that threaten the health of the entire forest stand is perniated. The function of the riparian buffer to protect water q ualit y Martin, shall not be impaired.. No clear-cuttin ma be practiced, an on the Propert Hopkins & Lemon, P.C. 3 101519 "042 DEC 03 13- 16 re of the size of the patch. It is the Grantors intention that the existin rem In in its existin state, character and location. The Grantors, or their successors an d as s 1 g n s, shat I notif the Grante e n o later than 3 0 da prior to the start o f an material forest activit as well as within 7 da of its completion. 5. Gradin blastin or earth removal shall not maten* all y , alter the topo of the Propert Minin on the Propert is prohibited. 6. No permanent or temporar b i uildin or structure, ncludin without limitation., communication towers, shall be built or maintained on the Propert other than non- r 'de 'al outbuildin commor . cs I - nt I d and appropriatel incidental to the use of the propert as a public park should same be conve to Roanoke Count or other g overnniental unit for such purpose. No buildin or structure shall be constructed within 100 feet in elevation from the visible rid line. 7. Industrial or commercial activities other than the followin are prohibited: (1) a silviculture, and horticulture as g overned b Para 4 and ( 11 ) temporar or seasonal outdoor activities which do not permanentl alter the ph appearance of the Propert and whIch are consistent with the conservation values herein protected, S. Representatives of the Grantee ma enter the Propert from time to time for the purpose of inspection and enforcement of the terms of this Easement after permission from or reasonable. notice to the Grantors or the Grantors' representative or assi 9. Grantors their heirs, successors, personal representatives and ass icins shall notif Grantee in writin prior to closin on an proposed transfer or sale of the Propert ­In an Deed conve all or an part of the Propert this Easement shall be referenced b Deed Book and Pa Number and/or b Instrument Number. Grantee expressl acknowled that it is contemplated b the parties that Grantor Martin, Hopkins & Lumall, P.C. may conve the propert encumbered b this Easement to Roanoke Count or some W other g overnmental entit for use as a public park. Use of the propert as a public park is permissible within and subject to the restrictions enumerated herein. Atthou this Easement' 1 1 in in g ross will. benefit the publ'c as descr'bed above, noth' herein shall be construed to conve to the public a ri g ht of access to or use of the Propert Grantors, their heirs, successors, personal representatives and, assi hereby retain exctusivc ri to such access and use, subject to the terms hereof. El 10519 "02 DEC 03 1346 re of the size of the patch. It is the Grantors intention that the existln forest remain in its existin state, character and location. The Grantors, or their successors and assi shall notif the Grantee no later flian 30 da prior to the start of an material forest activit as wett as within 7 da of its completion. 5. Gradin blastin or earth removal shall not materiall alter the topo of the Propoert Minin on the Propert is prohibited. 6. No permanent or temporar l Rdin or structure, including, without limitation, communication towers, shall be built or maintained on the Propert other than non- residential outbUildin commonl and appropriatel incidental to the use of the propert as a public park should same be conve to Roanoke Count or other g ovenunentat unit for such purpose. No buildin or structure shall be constructed within. 100 feet in elevation from the visible rid line. 7. Industrial or commercial activities other than the followin are prohibited: ( i ) a silviculture, and horticulture as g overned b Para 4; and ( 11) temporar or seasonal outdoor activities which do not pen-nanentl after the ph appearance of the Propert and which are consistent with the conservation values herein protected. 8. Representatives of the Grantee ma enter the Propert from time to time for the purpose of inspection and enforcement of the terms of this Easement after pen-nission from or reasonable notice to the Grantors or the Grantors' represen, tat' ive or assi 9. Grantors,, their heirs, successors, personal representatives and assi shall 110tif Grantee in writin prior to closin on an proposed transfer or sale of the 0­1 Propert --In an Deed conve all or an part of the Propert this Easement shall be referenced b Deed Book and Pa Number and/or b Instrument Number. Grantee expressl acknowled that it 'is contemplated b the parties that Grantor Marti Fl.. Hopkins & Lemon, P.C. ma convc the propert encumbered b this Easement to Roanoke Count or some other g overnmental entit for use as a public park. Use of the propert as a public park ts peniiissible within and subject to the restrictions enumerated herein. Althou this Easement in g ross will benefit the public as described above, nothin herein shall, be constnted. to conve to the public a ri g ht of access to or use of the Propert Grantors, their heirs, successors, personal representatives and assi hereb retain exclusive ri to such access aril use, sub to the ten-ns hereof. 4 6 PG i� DEC 3 ' 13 , 1 1 3 WITNESS the following ignatur and scals. GRAN TORS: ( SEAL) A LFRED A DURHAM { (SEAL) B ETH S. DURH A CCEPTED: WESTER F I I I. LAND TRUST � 'a f •a F' d F title: - B S TATE OF 'T t o -wi t: The forego instrument was acknowledged for th N ovember, 2002, by Alfred. A, Durham. . Notar Pubfici�ovwb� 1'_AP0 My commission expires: (S E A L Hopkins Demon, P. C. 5 . ,2 DEC 0 STATE OF IT COUNTY -wit: The foregoing instrument w kno- wedged before me th '� day of Nove mber, 2002, by Beth S. Durham. Notary Public Afr- M conunission expires: /0 (SEA M Hopkins , 6 21 • DEC 43 1317 EXHIBIT A BEGINN'IN G at a point on the 'north easterl comer of Lot 2 1, Block 2 1, accordin to the Map of Section 7, La Bellevue, recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke Count Vir in Plat Book 9, pa 150 thence leavin said be point and with the outside line of said Section 7, La Bellevue, S. 52' 46" 42" W. 920 feet to a point thence S. 7 5' 20' 45 " W. 111 6..x.3 feet to a point thence S. 18 3 F 00" W. 600 feet to a point tbence S. 56' 52' 35" W. 355,30 feet to a pomt on the outside ] ine of the propert of Wilclare Corporation thence with the same, N. 4V 40' 4 1" W. 1.275 feet, n-i-ore or less, to a point on the propert now or formerl owned b "Read", thence with the same,, N. 370 19" E. 1214-62 feet and N. 44' 50' E. 1070 feet to a point on the easterl outside line of the propert of W1.1cl .re ; thence with the same S, 58* 15' E. 2000 feet, more or less, to the place of BEGINNING; and EXCEPTINLG THEREFROM the followin parcels: ( 1 ) Parcel and easement conve to the Roanoke Count Board Of SUpervisors b Wilclare Corporation b deed dated Epee ember 18, 198 1. and (2) stora tank lot and a 50 foot utilit and road easement leadin thereto as shown on a plat made b Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, dated, December 18, 1981. TOGETHER WITH an easement across the remainin propert of the part of the, first part, said easement be g innin g at the I eniiination of Coachman Circle as shown on the Map of Section 4, 'La BellevLte, recorded in Plat Book 8, pa 35 to extend across the remainin propert of the part of the first part to the propert conve herein. The location of said easement to be as mutuall a Upon. and said easement to remain at such loccation unless and until the remainin propert of the part of the first part is subdivided at which time the part of the first part reserves the ri to substitute for the easement g ranted b this deed an easement over such roads as will be shown on such recorded plats and also, a 50 foot easement leadin from such road to the propert conve herein, said 50 foot easement to be located near the stora tank lot which is exempted from this conve as here i nab ove set opt. BEING the same propert conve to Grantors b deed dated December 21, 1982 .0 recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1180, pa 978. Nia rt i n, Hopkins & Lemon, P.C. - -% 'M,.FW - nrc 134 HG in. 23 Lt. u-j I STATE OF VIRGINIA ■ _fir � ■ � ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS 3 ^ DAY OF I 1 200? 1 BY Ia - \1-0 G 3 ,-ow elmN MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 12/31/04. rl-, 1 -'00 '724537 TNw RUMEN' N THE RDE' RKS E N o KE 0Ui i N ON ri A D E C'n' M. B E R i T 0 T 14 Amn PAM AR Lit " n DE ij R; w ;Pkp. � ' ' l. RE'll].1- 5 - E t-, 1 0 THE "Ag 1 5' LOCAL. le DrG E A 'GRAW. Cl RK BY AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2012 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A BROADCASTING TOWER APPROXIMATELY 120 FEET IN HEIGHT IN AN AG -3, AGRICULTURAL /RURAL PRESERVE, DISTRICT ON 0.121 ACRE, LOCATED AT 2857 SUMMIT RIDGE ROAD (TAX MAP NUMBER 039.00 -01- 08.01- 0000), HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Western Virginia Water Authority has filed a petition for a special use permit for a broadcasting tower approximately 120 feet in height in an AG -3, Agricultural /Rural Preserve, District on 0.121 acre, located at 2857 Summit Ridge Road (Tax Map Number 039.00 -01- 08.01 - 0000), Hollins Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 6, 2012; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on February 28, 2012; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on March 27, 2012. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to the Western Virginia Water Authority for a broadcasting tower approximately 120 feet in height in an AG -3, Agricultural /Rural Preserve, District on 0.121 acre, located at 2857 Summit Ridge Road (Tax Map Number 039.00 -01- 08.01 - 0000), Hollins Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 2005 Community Plan, as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2 -2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and that it shall have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding Page 1 of 2 neighborhood or community, and said special use permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: a) The proposed development shall be in substantial conformance with the concept plan entitled "Western Virginia Water Authority Summit Ridge Site" dated December 23, 2011. b) The proposed tower shall not exceed a total height of 120'. c) No lighting shall be allowed on the broadcast tower unless required by the Federal Aviation Administration. d) The width of the broadcasting tower at the top (120 feet) shall not exceed 6.5 inches in diameter. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The provisions of this special use permit are not severable. Invalidation of any word, phrase, clause, sentence or paragraph shall invalidate the remainder. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. Page of