HomeMy WebLinkAbout1/22/2013 - Regularis
z
�a
INVOCATION:
Disclaimer.
Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors
January 22, 2013
Pastor Nathan Anderson
Brookhill Baptist Church
"Any invocation that may be offered before the official start of the Board meeting
shall be the voluntary offering of a private citizen, to and for the benefit of the
Board. The views or beliefs expressed by the invocation speaker have not been
previously reviewed or approved by the Board and do not necessarily represent
the religious beliefs or views of the Board in part or as a whole. No member of
the community is required to attend or participate in the invocation and such
decision will have no impact on their right to actively participate in the business of
the Board."
Page 1 of 6
z
►o
Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors
Agenda
January 22, 2013
Good afternoon and welcome to our meeting for January 22, 2013. Regular meetings
are held on the second and fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at
7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be
announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be
rebroadcast on Thursday at 7:00 p.m. and on Saturday at 4:00 p.m. Board of
Supervisors meetings can also be viewed online through Roanoke County's website at
www.RoanokeCountyVA.gov. Our meetings are closed- captioned, so it is important for
everyone to speak directly into the microphones at the podium. Individuals who require
assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors
meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772 -2005 at least 48 hours in
advance. Please turn all cell phones off or place on silent.
A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 p.m.)
1. Roll Call
2. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag
B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF
AGENDA ITEMS
C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
1. Recognition Award to the Mid -Week Crew (MWC) of the Pathfinders for
Greenways by the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation,
Division of Natural Heritage (Doug Blount, Director of Parks, Recreation and
Tourism)
D. BRIEFINGS
1. Annual report from the Roanoke Regional Partnership (Beth Doughty,
Executive Director)
0
Page 2 of 6
E.
F.
G.
NEW BUSINESS
1. Request to amend the scope of services for the A/E contract with Holzheimer,
Bolek and Meehan for additional Construction Management and Project
Administration Services for the Glenvar Library, Catawba Magisterial District
(Daniel R. O'Donnell, Assistant County Administrator)
2. Request for authorization to execute a performance agreement between the
County of Roanoke, Roanoke County Economic Development Authority,
HyperGen, Inc. and 4D Investments, LLC, Hollins Magisterial District (Jill
Loope, Acting Director of Economic Development)
APPOINTMENTS
1. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Review Committee (appointed by
District)
2. Parks, Recreation and Tourism Advisory Commission (appointed by District)
3. Roanoke County Planning Commission (appointed by District)
4. Social Services Advisory Board (appointed by District)
CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED
BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE
RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION
IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT
AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY
1. Approval of minutes — January 8, 2013
2. Resolution accepting and appropriating grant funds in the amount of
$342,000 from the Virginia Department of Transportation for fiscal year 2012-
2013 and authorizing the execution of project administration agreements for
fiscal year 2012 -2013 "The Plantation Road Bicycle, Pedestrian and
Streetscape Improvement Project"
3. Resolution of appreciation of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to
Jerry L. Spradling, Fire Captain, upon his retirement after more than eleven
(11) years of service
4. Resolution accepting Waterstone Drive into the Virginia Department of
Transportation (VDOT) Secondary System
Page 3of6
5. Confirmation of appointment to the Community Policy and Management Team
(CPMT); Roanoke County Planning Commission
6. Request to amend the lease with Valley Electric Supply, Inc. for the
temporary Glenvar Library at 2630 Main Street, Salem, Virginia
7. Resolution requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to
designate Lancaster Road, Route 708 as a Rural Rustic Road in the VDOT
Secondary System, Windsor Hills Magisterial District
H. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS
I. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
J. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
K. REPORTS
1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
2. Capital Reserves
3. Reserve for Board Contingency
4. Treasurer's Statement of Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy as
of December 31, 2012
5. Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Revenues as of December
31, 2012
6. Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Expenditures and
Encumbrances as of December 31, 2012
7. Accounts Paid — November 30, 2012
8. Report of Claims Activity for the Self- Insurance Program
9. Community Development Quarterly Report
L. WORK SESSIONS
1. Work session to discuss fiscal year 2013 -2014 budget development (B.
Clayton Goodman III, County Administrator; W. Brent Robertson, Director of
Management and Budget)
Page 4 of 6
2. Work session to discuss the Catawba Sustainability Center Report (B.
Clayton Goodman III, County Administrator)
M. CLOSED MEETING, pursuant to the Code of Virginia as follows:
1. Section 2.2.3711.A.1, personnel, namely discussion concerning an
appointment to the Roanoke County Planning Commission (appointed by
District)
EVENING SESSION — 7:00 P.M.
N. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION
O. PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION
1. Public Hearing and adoption of a Resolution on the Plantation Road
Transportation Alternatives Program grant application, Hollins Magisterial
District (Megan G. Cronise, Principal Planner)
2. Public Hearing and Request for Resolution of Support to apply for fiscal year
2013 -2014 Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Transportation
Alternatives Program funding for the Eastern Section of the Roanoke River
Greenway- Roanoke City to Blue Ridge Parkway, Vinton Magisterial District
(Doug Blount, Director of Parks, Recreation and Tourism; Lindsay
Blankenship, Greenway Planner)
P. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Philip M. Argabright to rezone approximately 12.9 acres from R -1, Low
Density Residential, District to AG -3, Agricultural /Rural Preserve, District,
located at 5032 Stanley Farm Road in the Glenvar area, Catawba Magisterial
District (Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning)
2. The petition of Friendship Health and Rehab Center South, Inc. and
Friendship Health and Rehab Center, Inc. to rezone approximately 10.27
acres from R -1, Low Density Residential, District to C -2, General Commercial,
District and to obtain a special use permit for a nursing home and life care
facility on property located at 5647 Starkey Road, Cave Spring Magisterial
District (Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning)
Q. CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMUNICATIONS
Page 5 of 6
R. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
1. Eddie "Ed" Elswick
2. Charlotte A. Moore
3. Richard C. Flora
4. Joseph B. "Butch" Church
5. Michael W. Altizer
S. ADJOURNMENT
Page 6of6
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. C -1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: January 22, 2013
AGENDA ITEM: Recognition Award to the Mid -Week Crew (MWC) of the
Pathfinders for Greenways by the Virginia Department of
Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage.
SUBMITTED BY: Doug Blount
Director of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism
APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III
County Administrator Bz�
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR), Division of Natural
Heritage would like to present their department's Recognition Award to the Mid -Week Crew
(MWC) of the Pathfinders for Greenways. The Pathfinders for Greenways is anon- profit
organization that focuses on volunteerism to build trails /greenways throughout the
Roanoke Valley. This organization donates hundreds of hours annually to Roanoke County
through trail building.
DCR would like to recognize - the Mid -Week Crew for their outstanding service in
conservation and management of Virginia's natural resources. The Mid --Week Crew is an
exemplary group that through their tireless volunteering provides recreation opportunities
for others. The Mid -Week Crew has donated hundreds of man hours to planning, building
and maintaining the trails at Poor Mountain NAP. The trails they built are open to the public
but they also serve as access to the fire management necessary to protect the globally
endangered pirate brush that grows in this Preserve.
The I\Aid -Week Crew that has worked on Poor Mountain is:
Eddie Baldwin
Tom Berdeen
Malcolm Black
Page 1 of 2
Blanche Brower
Mervin Brower
James Brown
Lynn Bryant
Peggy W. Bryant
David Foster
Charles Gilliland
Bill Gordge
Roger Holnback
Stewart Hubbell
Vernon Hudson
Bud LaRoche
Jim Lewis
Mac McDaniel - deceased
Jim Overholser
Curt Overi ngton
Ron Reese
Jim Roberson
Hugh Scruggs
Don Strum
Maurice Turner
John VanLuik
Bill Gordge, the Mid -Week Crew Leader will be in attendance to accept the award.
Tom Smith, Director of the Natural Heritage Division, Ryan Klopf, Mountain Region Steward
and Wesley Paulos, Mountain Operations Steward will be in attendance from the Virginia
Department of Conservation and Recreation to make the award presentation to the Bill
Gordge and the Mid -Week Crew. Liz Belcher, Roanoke Valley Greenway Coordinator will
also be a part of the award presentation.
Page 2 of 2
ACTION NO.
ITEM NCB. D -1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: January 22, 2013
AGENDA ITEM: Annual report from the Roanoke Regional Partnership (Beth
Doughty, Executive Director)
SUBMITTED BY: Deborah C. Jacks
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman II
Count y Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This .time has been set aside for Beth Doughty, Executive Director of the Roanoke
Regional Partnership, to provide the partnership's annual report to the Board.
Page 1 of 1
CD
*=I
�
Ron
�
CD
=
ca
,,cc da
CO3 �
= o
ab
cc
ca
CD Ron o
NMI GD �
� o
CD �
com
N
LM
AW
LM
am
Tif
a)
a)
E
0
0
�
cn
�
N
>
O
m
0
�
N
N
O
cn
4ma
m
cn
�
�
cn
<
0
:3
C:
Tif
qlm
0
cm
r..
All �lk
z
C) =
Z3
coi
o�
"
O
W
cm
z
oa
cc a
All �lk
IC4
qrm
(73 qrma
cyp>
4=
4L
C4
T
C2
C4
qqrm
qv�
C2
CN
CD
r
C14
as
0
0
04
COD
P
Ca
LU
M"
ca
06
NMI
li
COD
COD
bid
ca
ca
COD
CI*4
TM
ca
C*#4
I v
r �
^ O i
�2 U
"'i am
g rmmmm
C)
z3
Lij IX
�CgLai
Lai
'Iez
o l
zim
CL
U)
6.
LO
LO
Q
0
N
�
Z
�
Z
"Vom
6n-
�
�
t�
�
�
0
1
m
c�
0
L
c!)
06
LM
a
0
x
o
MW
E
as
Lm
FM
I v
r �
^ O i
�2 U
"'i am
g rmmmm
C)
z3
Lij IX
�CgLai
Lai
'Iez
o l
zim
CL
cm
Now
Elm
IL
cm
r
O
N
0 :k6
i
t
0
0
LLI 14M
low CL
_ v
O �
H
M���
M���
Lml
r 3 A", k
L iw
70j"
0
■ ME=%
F low
•
k�
0%
, mss
0
z3
Lij IX
�C9 ui
Lai
'Iez
zim
CL
th
Vif
a)
a)
E
0
0
�
cn
�
N
>
O
m
0
�
N
N
O
cn
4mmi
m
cn
�
�
cn
<
0
:3
C:
Vif
N
N �
N�
o �
N �
N
m
r
y
O
=
N
p
Awl
co
�
O
r
■
N
U)
0
L
0
cc
Za
N
�
W �
C9 W
LAA
N
Zim
p Q
cc a
ILI I ou
V
C
'O
Ca
co 0
�
C �
ll
s c
u ca
ca a
x
T --
C
O
T
T
q
0 tlo
0
ti
co
ON
c 00
r
r
O
N N
N
•
In
0
N
am
61
u
W
0
w
as
as
N
N
N IL am
N d
d
IL
",J
, mss
gr 0
G
ui IX
M
LAA
cc CL
die lk
c
i
C
C
0
0
•
In
0
N
am
61
u
W
0
w
as
as
N
N
N IL am
N d
d
IL
",J
, mss
gr 0
G
ui IX
M
LAA
cc CL
die lk
Vif
a)
a)
E
0
0
�
cn
�
N
>
O
m
0
�
N
N
O
cn
4mmi
m
cn
�
�
cn
<
0
:3
C:
Vif
PF
Ilk
LIM
rY
"i
0
ui
I= ui
LAA
cc CL
disk
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. E -1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEUING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
January 22, 2013
Request to amend the scope of services for the AIE contract
with Holzheimer, Bolek and Meehan for additional Construction
Management and Project Administration Services for the
Glenvar Library, Catawba Magisterial District
Daniel R. O'Donnell
Assistant County Administrator
B. Clayton Goodman III
County Administrator ��
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION
Staff is requesting authorization to amend and extend the A &E contract with Holzheimer,
Bolek and Meehan for the Glenvar Library to ensure that all construction is accomplished
successfully. The project is well within budget; however there is a two (2) month delay from
the original project schedule necessitating the extension of these services. The substantial
completion date for the project is now March 23, 2013, with final completion expected by
the end of April. We are scheduling a May G, 2013, opening for the new Glenvar Library.
One (1) month of the delay was caused by extending the estimated construction period at
the front end of the construction to allow the contractor sufficient time to complete the work.
f he second month was due to a delay in the delivery of storefront and window materials by
the manufacturer. The contractor has agreed to compensate the County for this delay.
Normally contract changes of this type are within the oversight of County Administration as
all necessary funds have already been appropriated to the project budget. However, as we
added construction management services to the contract after the A &E contract was
approved, combined change orders to the contract total in excess of twenty -five (25 %) of
the original amount. According to County procurement regulations and the Procurement
Code of Virginia, change orders exceeding more than twenty -five percent (25 %) must be
approved by the Board of Supervisors. Staff is requesting the authority to add $20,405.64
Page 1 of 2
for two (2) months of construction management services and one month of contract
administration. In addition, we are also requesting the ability to extend the contract one
additional month for another $12,406.64 should continued services be necessary after April
30, 2013. Finally we are requesting to add $2,000 for reimbursable expenses, primarily
travel costs. This would make the maximum change up to $34,811.24. Of this amount,
$1 6,480.92 is being credited back to the County by the general contractor due to the need
to extend their schedule. The remaining $19,330.36 is available in the project contingency
accounts. This change will bring the total contract amount for A &E and construction
management services to $666,609.08.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no project budget impact as the $34,811.28 is available in the project budget.
$'16,480.92 will be recovered as a credit from the General Contractor for a schedule
extension. Therefore up to $19,330.36 will come from previously appropriated and
available project funds.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the approval of a contract modification not to exceed $34,811.28 for the
contract with Holzheimer, Bolek and Meehan for an extension of construction management
and project administration services to ensure the successful completion of the new Glenvar
Library.
Page 2 of 2
Holzheimer Bolek + Meehan I Architects, LLC Owner / Architect Additional
Services
r .. O/A 11 004
' 1382 West Ninth Street, Suite 300, Cleveland, Ohio 4 °
OWNER: HOLZHEIMER BOLEK + MEEHAN I Architects, LLC
Roanoke County Public Library Principal:
Roanoke, Virginia 48130 Peter J. Bolek, A.I.A.
Mr. Daniel R. O'Donnell, Assistant County Administrator Project Manager:
Jamie Shook, RA LEED AP
Scope of Work:
Extension of Construction Phase and Construction Observation (O /A #001) services to April 30, 2013 due to extension
of the construction period and the Contract Time as defined by Change Order CO -005.
Construction Phase A/E services: $4,405.64
Construction Observation: $16,000.00
$20,405.64
In the event the construction period extends beyond April 30, 2013, these services may be extended on a monthly basis
at the Owner's discretion as follows:
Construction Phase A/E services: $4,405.64
Construction Observation: $8,000.00
$12,405.64
The above figures do not include any reimbursable expenses. A budget of $2,000 is recommended to cover additional
reimbursable expenses through the extended construction period.
Fee Basis:
F Percentage of Construction Cost % estimated Construction Cost $
® Lump Sum $ 20,405.64
F Hourly Fee Est: $
F Hourly not to exceed $
Consultant Mark -up 1.10% x Cost
Reimbursable Mark -up 1.10% x Cost
HOLZHEIMER BOLEK + MEEHAN I ARCHITECTS
OWNER (AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE)
Peter J. Bolek, A.I.A.
Daniel R. O'Donnell
BY
BY
Principal
Assistant County Administrator
TITLE
TITLE
f
SIGNATURE
SIGNATURE
01 -07 -2013
DATE OF SIGNATURE
DATE OF SIGNATURE
Work to be performed under the Conditions of:
® Existing Contract dated: January 25, 2011
El Other
S:\PROJECT - ACTIVE\Roanoke County Public Library \Glenvar Branch \1.020 Contract A -O \Add Services \A -O 004 Construction phase time
extension \O -A Add Service 04 Construction phase time extension.doc
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. E -2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT - rHE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CEN
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
January 22, 2013
Request for authorization to execute a performance agreement
between the County of Roanoke, the Roanoke County
Economic Development Authority, HyperGen, Inc. and 4D
Investments, LLC, Hollins Magisterial District
Jill Loo pe
Acting Director of Economic Development
B. Clayton Goodman
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
HyperGen, Inc is a growing technology company that provides IT consulting services and
software solutions to companies throughout the United States. They have been in
business in the Roanoke area since 1992 and have grown substantially during this time.
After extensive analysis of available sites in the region, HyperGen has decided to construct
a 10,000 sq . ft. corporate office building on two point five (2.5) acres on Wald rond Drive off
of Plantation Road in Roanoke County. HyperGen is planning a $1.5 million investment in
personal property and a new modern facility, to accommodate their current and future
growth needs. They currently employ twenty (2Q) people with high skill level requirements
in Management Information Systems, Software Engineering and Computer Science fields,
with projections to grow their business by up to thirty percent (30 %) within the next two (2)
years. - rhe company also pays wages in excess of the County's median wage rate by up
to forty percent (40%).
To assist with their expansion, a four- party performance agreement has been negotiated
between Roanoke County, Roanoke County Economic Development Authority, HyperGen,
Inc. and 4D Investments, LLC. This agreement will promote and encourage - theexpansion
Page 1 of 2
of this high tech company, and provide increased employment and corporate investment in
Roanoke.
The agreement allows for an economic development grant in an amount equal to two years
of new local tax revenue to be reimbursed to the company after the new facility is built.
New local tax revenue is defined as new real estate and business license and personal
property taxes generated annually by the project, not to exceed to $75,000 in total. This is
consistent with the County's Public Private Partnership Policy. If the company generates
less than the estimated new local tax revenue, then the actual grant for that year shall be
less. The two -year period will commence on January 1, 2014.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Per the performance agreement, the grant will be calculated as a reimbursement based on
new tax revenues generated by the project; therefore, the fiscal impact will be in the form of
foregone revenue. No new funding is needed for this project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends authorizing the execution of a performance agreement between the
County of Roanoke, the Roanoke County Economic Development Authority, HyperGen,
Inc. and 4D Investments, LLC.
Page 2 of 2
PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT
THIS PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT (the "Agreement ") is made as of this
"Company ").
WITNESSETH
"Project ") located at Walrond Drive in Roanoke County (the "Property "), and
WHEREAS, HyperGen is the operating business entity and 4D Investments, LLC
is the owner of the real estate; however both entities are deemed the "Company" for
purposes of this agreement; and,
1
WHEREAS, the County and the Authority expect that HyperGen will maintain
its high quality employment opportunities for the citizens of the Roanoke Valley with
the completion of this Project which will promote economic development and generate
new local tax revenues for Roanoke County; and
WHEREAS, this increased employment and investment constitutes a valid
C. The Company agrees to provide the County and the Authority any
and all documentation that may be required to verify the investment and employment
figures for the duration of this Agreement.
2. Procedures for the reimbursement of Authority funds to the Company
2
A. Beginning in calendar year 2014, the County shall appropriate to
the Authority in two annual installments sums sufficient, for an Economic Development
Incentive Grant for the benefit of the Company. These sums sufficient amounts will
equal a total of two years of "New Local Tax Revenues." The term, "New Local Tax
reimbursement amounts. The Authority shall pay the annual reimbursement amount to
the Company at an address designated by the Company within thirty (30) days after
receipt by the Authority of the data.
C. If the Company terminates this Project or fails to complete the
construction of this development by March 31, 2014, then the Authority shall be
3
relieved of any obligation to the Company for any Economic Development Incentive
Grant.
3. The Company shall have the right to assign this Agreement to a separate
entity provided that any such assignment shall not relieve the Company of its
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement
the day and year first above written.
n
Approved as to form:
By:
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
By•
B. Clayton Goodman, III,
County Administrator
Notary Public
My Commission expires:
A,901hL
Approved as to form:
By: Affm
Attorney f
STATE OF VIRGINIA )4
)ss
COUNTY OF ROANOKE )
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY
By:
Chairman
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
2013, by , Chairman of the Economic
Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia.
Notary Public
My Commission expires: -/-/
5
HYPERGEN, INC.
By•
Its:
efore me this day of
kas of
My C ommissi on expires: /
HyperGen, Inc.
My Commission expires:
No
Public
4D INVESTMENT, LLC
f ument was acknowledged before me this
2013, by , as
Notary Public
day of
of
G
110 11
ITEM NO. F.14
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: January 22, 2013
AGENDA ITEM: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards
SUBMITTED BY: Deborah C. Jacks
Clerk to the Board
APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
1. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Review Committee (appointed by District)
The following one -year term expired on August 31, 2011:
a) James M. Chewning representing the Vinton Magisterial District
The following one -year term expired on August 31, 2012:
a) Becky Walter, representing the Hollins Magisterial District; Ms. Walter has
served three consecutive terms and therefore cannot be reappointed.
2. Parks, Recreation and Tourism Advisory Commission (appointed by District)
The three -year term of Roger L. Falls who represents the Vinton District expired on
June 30, 2012.
3. Roanoke County Planning Commission (appointed by District)
The four -year term of David Radford who represents the Windsor Hills District expired
on December 31, 2012.
Page 1 of 2
4. Social Services Advisory Board (appointed by District)
The four -year term of Charles Wertalik, Vinton Magisterial District, expired July 31,
2012. Mr. Wertalik has moved from the Vinton Magisterial District and therefore
cannot be reappointed.
Page 2 of 2
r�
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 22, 2013
RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET
FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE
DESIGNATED AS ITEM G- CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for January 22,
2013, designated as Item G - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred
in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 8
inclusive, as follows:
1. Approval of minutes — January 8, 2013
2. Resolution accepting and appropriating grant funds in the amount of $342,000
from the Virginia Department of Transportation for fiscal year 2012 -2013 and
authorizing the execution of project administration agreements for fiscal year
2012 -2013 "The Plantation Road Bicycle, Pedestrian and Streetscape
Improvement Project"
3. Resolution of appreciation of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to Jerry
L. Spradling, Fire Captain, upon his retirement after more than eleven (11) years
of service
4. Resolution accepting Waterstone Drive into the Virginia Department of
Transportation (VDOT) Secondary System
5. Confirmation of appointment to the Community Policy and Management Team
(CPMT)
6. Request to amend the lease with Valley Electric Supply, Inc. for the temporary
Glenvar Library at 2630 Main Street, Salem, Virginia
7. Resolution requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to
designate Lancaster Road, Route 708 as a Rural Rustic Road in the VDOT
Secondary System, Windsor Hills Magisterial District
Page 1of1
ACTION NUMBER
ITEM NUMBER G -2
AT A REGULAR MEE - rINC OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE
AGENDA ITEM
SUBMIT'rED BY
APPROVED BY:
January 22, 2013
Resolution accepting and appropriating grant funds in the
amount of $342,000 from the Virginia Department of
Transportation for fiscal year 2012 -2013 and authorizing the
execution of project administration agreements for fiscal year
2012 -2013 , - fhe Plantation Road Bicycle, Pedestrian and
Streetscape Improvement Project"
David Holladay
Planning Administrator
B. Clayton Goodman III
County Administrator j;s�
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
On June 20, 2012, the Commonwealth Transportation Board awarded $341,000 in federal
Transportation Enhancement Funds to Roanoke County. These funds include a twenty
percent (20 %) match from the locality. "fhe twenty percent (20 %) match is a combination
of in -kind services of staff time, as well as funds from the Economic Development Authority
and Roanoke County Public Private Partnership.
In accordance with Roanoke County's Grant Policies and Procedures, a budget
appropriation must be established through Board of Supervisors action for expenditures to
be processed against a grant. The Department of Community Development requests that
the Board of Supervisors appropriate the grant funds, along with corresponding match
amounts shown below under "Fiscal Impact ".
- fhe Plantation Road Bicycle, Pedestrian and Streetscape Improvement project includes
sidewalks, crosswalks, bicycle lanes, landscaping and improvements to medians and turn
lanes to be constructed on Plantation Road, between Interstate 81 and Williamson Road.
Page 1 of 2
The project has received Revenue Sharing funds for preliminary engineering of these
improvements. On October 25, 2011, a request for Transportation Enhancement Program
funds was submitted to the commonwealth Transportation Board, by resolution of the
Board of Supervisors.
For Transportation Enhancement Projects, VDOT requires certain agreements to be
executed between the local government and the Commonwealth of Virginia. In order to
execute the project agreements, the Board of Supervisors must grant signatory authority to
a specific staff persons). in the case of the approved Roanoke county enhancement
project, that staff person would be either the County Administrator, or the county Engineer.
FISCAL IMPACT
Roanoke county matching funds for 20% of the federal award are as follows:
$27 In-kind services, community Development Staff
$28,880 Economic Development Authority
$28,880 Economic Development Public Private Partnership
ALTERNATIVES
1. Adopt the resolution to accept and appropriate grant funds in the amount of $341,000
from the Virginia Department of Transportation for fiscal year 2012 - 2013, and match
- the grant award with $85,250, and grant signatory authority to execute project
administration agreements for fiscal year 2012 - 2013, Transportation Enhancement
Project entitled the Plantation Road Bicycle, Pedestrian and Streetscape Improvements
Project
2. Take no action at this time.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Alternative 1.
Paget oft
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON JANUARY 22, 2013
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING GRANT FUNDS IN
THE AMOUNT OF $342,000 FROM THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION FOR FISCAL YLEAR 2012 -2013, AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF PROJECT ADMINISTRATION
AGREEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012 -2013 "THE PLANTATION
ROAD BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT"
WHEREAS, on October 25, 2011, the Board of Supervisors submitted a request
to the Commonwealth Transportation Board for Transportation Enhancement Funds for
the Plantation Road Bicycle, Pedestrian and Streetscape Improvement Project; and
WHEREAS, on June 20, 2012, the Commonwealth Transportation Board
awarded $341,000 of federal Transportation Enhancement Funds to Roanoke County;
and
WHEREAS, the grant award requires twenty percent (20 %) matching funds in the
amount of $85,260, from Roanoke County; and
WHEREAS, for locally administered projects, the Virginia Department of
Transportation requires certain project administration agreements between the local
government and the Commonwealth of Virginia; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation requires that the Board of
Supervisors grant signatory authority to a specific staff person or persons to execute the
project administration agreements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, By the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
Page 1 of 2
1. That the Board hereby accepts and appropriates grant funds in the
amount of $341,000 from the Virginia Department of Transportation for
fiscal year 2012 -2013, and matches the grant award with $85,260; and
2. That the County Administrator or the County Engineer is hereby granted
signatory authority to execute project administration agreements for the
approved Transportation Enhancement Project, entitled "The Plantation
Road Bicycle, Pedestrian and Streetscape Improvement Project ".
Page 2 of 2
ACTION NO.
ITEM No. G -3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS of ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBMIT'r'ED BY:
APPROVED BY:
January 22, 2013
Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County to Jerry L. Spradling, Fire
Captain, upon his retirement after more than eleven (11) years
of service
Deborah C. Jacks
Clerk to the Board
B. Clayton Goodman III
County Administrator &ja
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY of INFORMATION:
Jerry L. Spradling, Fire Captain retired on January 1, 2013, after more than eleven (
years of service. Mr. Spradling is unable to attend today's Board Meeting.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution.
Page 1 of 1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 22, 2013
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO JERRY L. SPRADING ,FIRE
CAPTAIN, UPON HIS RETIREMENT AFTER ELEVEN (11) YEARS OF
SERVICE
WHEREAS, Jerry L. Spradling was hired on August 27, 2001, and has worked as a
Firefighter /EMT and Paramedic /Firefighter during his tenure with Roanoke County; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Spradling retired on January 1, 2013, after eleven (11) years and
four (4) months of devoted, faithful and expert service with the County; and
WHEREAS, during his time serving Roanoke County, Mr. Spradling provided
outstanding emergency care to the sick and injured to those he transported to the hospital;
and
WHEREAS, Mr. Spradling through -out his tenure with Roanoke County Fire and
Rescue Department was a mentor to new employees always with a calm and reassuring
approach to garner the best out of new personnel; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Spradling was assigned duties as a Public Education Specialist
providing fire safety training to all ages in a professional manner; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Spradling was instrumental in developing the specifications and
design for the Department's current Fire Safety Trailer, which was funded one hundred
percent (100 %) through a Department of Homeland Security grant; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of
Roanoke County to Jerry L. Spradling, for eleven (11) years of capable, loyal and
dedicated service to Roanoke County; and
Page 1 of 2
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy and
productive retirement.
Page 2 of 2
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. G -4
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DA`rE: January 22, 2013
AGENDA ITEM: Resolution accepting Waterstone Drive into the Virginia
Department of Transportation (VDOT) Secondary System
SUBMITTED BY: Tarek Moneir
Deputy Director of Development Services
APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman I
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The County of Roanoke requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to
the VDOT requesting they accept 0.23 mile of Waterstone Drive from the intersection
with Poage Valley Road Ext. (VA Sec. Rte 690) in the direction of west to the end of its
cul -de -sac.
The staff has inspected this road along with representatives of VDOT and finds the road
is acceptable.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No County funding is required.
STAFF RECOMMENDA'T'ION:
Staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to VDOT requesting they accept
Waterstone Drive into the Secondary Road System.
Page 1 of 1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 22, 2013
RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF WATERSTONE
DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SECONDARY SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Addition Form AM -4.3, fully
incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of
the Circuit Court of Roanoke County; and
WHEREAS, the representative for the Virginia Department of Transportation has
advised this Board that the street(s) meet the requirements established by the Virginia
Department of Transportation's Subdivision Street Requirements; and
WHEREAS, the County and the Virginia Department of Transportation have
entered into an agreement on March 9, 1999, for comprehensive stormwater detention
which applies to this request for addition.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia
Department of Transportation to add the street(s) described on the attached Additions
Form AM -4.3 to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1 -229, Code
of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, after receiving a
copy of this resolution and all outstanding fees and documents required of the
developer, whichever occurs last in time; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted
right -of -way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage;
and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be
Page 1 of 2
forwarded to the Residency Administrator for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Page of
-4D%X>
Z; ITE
ROAD
RC)A13
NORTH
'- for 4�7.0
?5' REAR if
A' SE BACK (TYP.)
J + � r � � � r� •
, � �4�t � 1!� r ! --15 510E I
J SETBACK I l
�� I
(Typ') orI f
i� � t i ! �r l r ►� � -
,,
! i I I�j tai, t�r r�l 1 ► I .� � ��
OF
� Ir � ��f �
� � I 1 1 �- . Creek
4F
15' SIDE + �
SETBACX O 30.
YP.) .� r i J
!� ~ ~ ! ! t j -sir ��t' 4nrP.} r + r ft
Cp lo t
r olp
2()0, r ��f POST I..
% F-37ro' FRONT
SETBACK (TYP.)
t I
0 11 W,
�Q POST �y 100 , - -YEAR Ex. Cr f f � � {y J ����• M� ��
1
� vA+. � 690 f J • w PRE AND POST
100 -YEAR
SWM LoT�1 % ' .. � �� • r ~ �.vonFU�lr�
_ +
t
0 .53 At. y � i r�
r
r' pol
r� - foo.
r
.r _•�.r+ r_{
PROPOSED ADDITION(S) IN GREY
DESCRIPTION LENGTH ROW WIDTH SERVICES
Miles Feet Feet Houses
Waterstone Drive; From I nt. of Poage Valley Rd.
Ext (Route 696) to the end of it's cul -de -sac 0.23 50 28 13
ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF WATERSTONE DRIVE INTO THE
DEPARTMENT OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SECONDARY SYSTEM
COMMUNITY DEVLOPMENT
In the County - of Roanoke
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By resolution of the governing body adopted January 8, 2013
The following VDOT Form AM -4.3 is hereby attached and incorporated as part of the governing body's resolution for
changes in the secondary system of state highways.
A Copy Testee Signed (County Official):
Report of Changes in the Secondary System of State Highways
Project /Subdivision Waterstone
Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Addition
The following additions to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to the statutory provision or provisions
cited, are hereby requested; the right of way for which, including additional easements for cuts, fills and drainage, as
required, is hereby guaranteed:
Reason for Change: New subdivision street
Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: §33.1 -229
Street Name and /or Route Number
♦ Waterstone Drive, State Route Number 2032
Old Route Number: 0
--------------------------------------------
• From: Int. Route 690
To: End, Cul -de -sac, a distance of: 0.23 miles.
Recordation Reference: Instr# 2007 -13566
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
VDOT Form AM -4.3 (4/20/2007) Maintenance Division
Date of Resolution: January 8, 2013 Page 1 of 1
FM
ITEM NO. G -5
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: January 22, 2013
AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of appointment to the Community Policy and
Management Team (CPMT)
SUBMIT'T'ED BY: Deborah C. Jacks
Clerk to the Board
APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III
County Administrator &Pa/
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY of INFORMATION:
1. Community Policy and Management Team (CPMT)
During the closed meeting on January 8, 2613, the Board of Supervisors recommended
the appointment of Lee Gouffray as a parent representative for a three -year term to
expire January 31, 2616. Ms. Gouffray has agreed to serve.
Page 1 of 2
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. G -5
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: January 22, 2013
AGENDA ITEM: Request to amend the lease with Valley Electric Supply, Inc.
for the temporary Glenvar Library at 2630 Main Street, Salem,
Virginia
SUBMITTED BY: Daniel R. O'Donnell
Assistant County Ad
APPROVED BY: S. Clayton Goodman III
County Administrator iz�
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Staff has tentatively renegotiated the lease with Valley Electric Supply, owner of the rented
space currently being used to house the temporary Glenvar Library. The amendment will
provide for a month to month renewal after March 31, 2013. The original lease provided for
a six (5)-month automatic renewal, but the temporary space will only be needed until April
30 2013, as the construction project will be substantially complete. Therefore, the County
will be saving $1,500 per month for five (5) months, or a total of $7,500 by amending the
lease. The landlord is agreeable to this change as long as we provide a two month notice,
which staff plans to do near the end of February.
Altarnativas
Alternative One -- Alternative one is to approve the amendment to the lease with Valley
Electrical Supply to provide for month to month extensions after March 31, 2013, and save
Roanoke County $1,500 per month.
Alternative Two — Alternative two is to deny approval of the amendment and allow the
lease to automatically renew for six months after March 31, 2013.
Page 1 of 2
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of Alternative One in order to decrease rental costs for
temporary library space by $1,500 per month.
Page 2 of 2
Addendum to Lease Agreement
Addendum # 2
This Addendum to Lease dated this z 7 day of 2012
which is attached to and made a part of the Lease Agreement dated April 27, 2011,
between VALLEY ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. (Landlord) and the ROANOKE COUNTY
BOARD of SUPERVISORS, (Tenant) for the lease of certain property and
improvements located in the City of Salem, Virginia, and described in the Lease as
2630 West Main Street, Salem, VA 24153, provides as follows:
TERM OF LEASE
The term of this lease shall commence as of the 15t day of June, 2011, and
shall continue until March 31, 2013. This lease shall automatically renew on a
month to month basis thereafter, until terminated by either party. After March 31
2013, either party may terminate this lease at any time by giving the other party 64
days' written notice of such termination.
Witness the following signatures and seals:
-ate
Landlord
Date
Tenant
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. O -7
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
January 22, 2013
Resolution requesting the Virginia Department of
Transportation (VDOT) to designate Lancaster Road, Route
708 as a Rural Rustic Road in the VDOT Secondary System,
Windsor Hills Magisterial District
David Holladay
Planning Administrator
B. Clayton Goodman III
��
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Lancaster Road, Route 708, was added to Roanoke County's Revenue Sharing Program in
fiscal year 2008 -2009. Improvements to Lancaster Road were to include widening, surface
treatment and replacing existing culverts from the intersection of Fortune Ridge Road,
Route 090, to the dead end of Lancaster Road.
In 2002, the General Assembly passed House Bill 659 which established a Rural Rustic
Road Program. The Rural Rustic Program (section 33.1 -70.1 of the Code of Virginia)
allows Counties to make improvements to roads that have limited funds available, doing so
with no or minimal encroachment beyond existing ditches and without compromising the
safety of the road. The road must also be a priority in the County Six -Year Plan and must
carry at least fifty (50) but no more than one thousand (1,000) vehicles per day. The road
must also be predominately used for local traffic and have minimal anticipated tragic
growth.
In order to limit construction impacts and costs, VDOT staff has recommended the road
improvements he designed and constructed under the Rural Rustic Program. To
participate in the Rural Rustic Road Program, the County must adopt a resolution
designating Lancaster Road as a Rural Rustic Road (resolution attached).
Page 1 of 2
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the attached resolution designating Lancaster Road, Route 708 as a Rural
Rustic Road.
2. Take no action at this time.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative 1.
Page 2 of 2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINSITRATION
CENTER ON JANUARY 22, 2013
RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION (VDOT) TO DESIGNATE LANCASTER ROAD,
ROUTE 708, AS A RURAL RUSTIC ROAD IN THE VDOT SECONDARY
SYSTEM, WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, Section 33.1 -70.1 of the Code of Virginia, permits the improvements
and hard surfacing of certain unpaved roads deemed to qualify for designation as a
Rural Rustic Road; and
WHEREAS, any such road must be located in a low- density development area
and have a minimum of fifty (50) vehicles per day (vpd), and have no more than one
thousand (1,000) vpd; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia ( "Board ")
desires to consider whether Lancaster Road, Route 708 from: from the intersection with
Fortune Ridge Road, Route 690 to: dead end of Lancaster Road, Route 608 should be
designated a Rural Rustic Road; and
WHEREAS, the Board is unaware of pending development that will significantly
affect the existing traffic on this road; and
WHEREAS, the citizens that utilize this road have been made aware that this
road may be paved with minimal improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Board believes that this road should be so designated due to its
qualifying characteristics and will endeavor to retain these characteristics through its
comprehensive planning process; and
WHEREAS, this road is in the Board's Revenue Sharing Program for
improvements to the secondary system of state highways; and
Page 1 of 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board herby designates this
portion of Lancaster Road as a Rural Rustic Road, and requests that the Residency
Administrator for the Virginia Department of Transportation concur in this designation;
and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board requests that this road be hard
surfaced and, to the fullest extent prudent, be improved within the existing right of way
and ditch -lines to preserve as much as possible the adjacent trees, vegetation, side
slopes, and rural rustic character along the road in their current state; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be
forwarded to the Residency Administrator for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Page 2 of 2
GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
Audited balance at June 30, 2012
Amount
K -1
.% of General
Fund Revenue
$ 20, 572, 318 10.67% *
Balance at January 22, 2013 $ 20 10.70% **
Mote: On December 21, 2004, the Board of Supervisors adopted a policy to increase the General
Fund Unappropriated Balance incrementally over several years.
* 2011 -12 -Goal of 11% of General Fund Revenues
2011 -12 General Fund Revenues
11 % of General Fund Revenues
** 2012 -13 - Goal of 11% of General Fund Revenues
2012 -13 General Fund Revenues
11 % of General Fund Revenues
$192
$21
$192
$21
The Unappropriated Fund Balance of the County is currently maintained at 10.70 %.
The County's goal is to increase the balance over time to 11.0%
Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens
Director of Finance
Approved By B. Clayton Goodman III
IM
County Administrator 6j<_j-
K -2
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
CAPITAL RESERVES
Minor County Capital Reserve
(Projects not in the CIP, architecturallengineering services, and other one - time expenditures.)
Major county Capital Reserve
(Projects in the CIP, debt payments to expedite projects identified in CIP, and land purchase opportunities.)
Audited balance at June 30, 2912 $938,151.00
Balance at January 22, 2013
Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens
Director of Finance
$938,151.00
Approved By B. Clayton Goodman III
County Administrator
Amount
Audited balance at June 30, 2912
$1,574,125.05
October 2012 Fire Truck loan payment for 2012 -13
390,900.99
Addition of 2011 -12 operations
1
Balance at January 22, 2013
$3,245,055.05
Major county Capital Reserve
(Projects in the CIP, debt payments to expedite projects identified in CIP, and land purchase opportunities.)
Audited balance at June 30, 2912 $938,151.00
Balance at January 22, 2013
Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens
Director of Finance
$938,151.00
Approved By B. Clayton Goodman III
County Administrator
K -3
RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
Amount
From 2012 -13 Original Budget $'100,000.00
June 26, 2012 Appropriation for Legislative Liaison (32,400.00)
August 14, 2012 Appropriation for relocation of three Roanoke County polling precincts (3
December 11, 2012 Appropriation for retiring debt of the Veteran's Monument at the Vinton (5
War Memorial
Balance at January 22, 2013 $ 59,350.00
Submitted By
Approved By
Rebecca E. Owens
Director of Finance
B. Clayton Goodman II
County Administrator Cjr
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER K -4
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER.
MEETING DATE: January 22, 2013
AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of
December 31, 2012.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
CASH INVESTMENT:
SUNTRUST CON 12 12
GOVERNMENT:
SMITH BARNEY CONTRA
45,115.21
SMITH BARNEY
48
WELLS FARGO
19
WELLS FARGO CONTRA
(250.00) 67
LOCAL GOVT INVESTMENT POOL:
GENERAL OPERATION
17 17
CD:
BRANCH BANKING & TRUST
2 2
MONEY MARKET:
BRANCH BANKING & TRUST 1
MORGAN STANLEY - JAIL 1
SMITH BARNEY 20
STELLAR ONE 3
WELLS FARGO 3 28
TOTAL 127
01/22/2013
M
O
N �-+
� O
O M
C7
C
LL
L
C
a)
i
(C) d7 CY) 07 (C) LA 00 (C) 00 00 O f` r O (D N 1` (D I` I` r I` 00
r d) ti N q LA 00 N N CF) O 00 r M U") LO � O O r CC) LO � O
r r Ln 00 O O CC) f` O L6 O r M N O M N d' r L6 cy; r r M
L(') r - r r r
O M I` LO CF) 00 00 N LO O CC) M r d) ti ti r M M (D (0
O d7 (3) d7 00 00 I� N r M CY) r 00 It N � O LSD T qqr (C) q;T r
d) 00 O d) M N dY r O O I` 07 N � 00 LA O O CC) ' ti
(D ; r 00 C CD LO lq (D Ldp r N r q;T 'IT M N 00 CY)
O r CC) N O O (D M f` LO O r r
i
f` LO
M
f`
d)
�
�
r
N
00
r
C
O
O
00
LO
d)
M
O
LO
O7
NT
O
N CD
00 N
I`
O
a�
a
O
N
�
LO
M
O
LO
�
O)
�
00
LO
O
I`
O
O
' L
M N
cy; N
Lf5
4
00
Ltd
(D
6
6
4
O
_N
6
r
Lf5
d;
00
p
6
Lf5
O
V
a
Ln
M �
4)
° a�
I`
M
O
M
M
I`
N
d
N m
N
M
M
";r
co)
M
N
LSD
00 'IT
O M
r
(D
r
C
N
�
(D
LO
>
O
O
L
I`
(D
r
�
!Q N
� r
L
U
� r
M
00 I`
N
00
�
a�
N
M
M
O
L6
O
N
r
N
r
N
O7
LA
r
r
�
O
LO M
M 00
00
O
r
N
m
I>
(3)
O
O
O
_
it
r
LO
00
W
(D
r-
r
r 0)
M M
N
00
r
O
.O
N
m
o
O
jL
I`
co
� tm
(0
r
LO
m
M
Q' CC
f`
..
f`
..
�
..
O
C
O
..
00
..
d�
U
Cl) O
..
M
..
N
..
(D
4) d
r
..
t0
..
N
s
r
N
r M
r (D
Z
L O
LL
L
00
O
O
O
I`
CL
LO
It
(D
N
d
a
a)
N
E
L
'IT
N
N
••�
'
O
.o
L.
r
N
} '
U
a
N
a)
r
M
r
cn
cn
>'
p
O
r
O
�
m
M
O
N �-+
� O
O M
C7
C
LL
L
C
a)
i
(C) d7 CY) 07 (C) LA 00 (C) 00 00 O f` r O (D N 1` (D I` I` r I` 00
r d) ti N q LA 00 N N CF) O 00 r M U") LO � O O r CC) LO � O
r r Ln 00 O O CC) f` O L6 O r M N O M N d' r L6 cy; r r M
L(') r - r r r
O M I` LO CF) 00 00 N LO O CC) M r d) ti ti r M M (D (0
O d7 (3) d7 00 00 I� N r M CY) r 00 It N � O LSD T qqr (C) q;T r
d) 00 O d) M N dY r O O I` 07 N � 00 LA O O CC) ' ti
(D ; r 00 C CD LO lq (D Ldp r N r q;T 'IT M N 00 CY)
O r CC) N O O (D M f` LO O r r
i
f` LO
N
f`
d)
Ltd
r
07
00
r
O
O
O
00
LO
d)
M
O
LO
O7
NT
O
N CD
00 N
I`
00
00
O
O
�
LO
M
O
LO
�
O)
�
00
LO
O
I`
O
O
O
M N
cy; N
Lf5
4
00
Ltd
(D
6
6
4
O
M
6
r
Lf5
d;
00
p
6
Lf5
O
O
N 1 4
M �
O
00
I`
M
O
M
M
I`
N
r
M
N
M
M
";r
co)
M
N
LSD
00 'IT
O M
r
(D
r
C
N
�
(D
LO
LO
O
O
(D
I`
(D
r
to
(1) (n
�
00 I`
N
00
N
O
M
M
O
L6
O
N
r
N
r
N
O7
LA
r
r
�
O
LO M
M 00
00
O
r
N
N
I>
(3)
O
O
d7
O7
it
r
LO
00
r
(D
r-
r
r 0)
M M
N
00
r
CF)
N
N
(C)
(D
O
(D
I`
co
r
(0
r
LO
f`
M
LO
f`
..
f`
..
�
..
O
..
M
O
..
00
..
d�
..
O
r
..
M
..
N
..
(D
..
00
r
..
t0
..
N
..
�
r
..
r M
r (D
�
0
N
M
00
O
O
O
I`
r
CY)
LO
It
(D
N
a)
N
I`
;
N
r
'IT
N
00
LO
'
C
r
r
r
N
} '
p7
M
N
a)
r
M
r
cn
cn
>'
p
O
r
O
�
It
O
qq
a)
a)
(D
L
N
r
i--'
O
0
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
m
LO
O
I` O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
I`
I�
M V-
C) O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
07
M
(0 N
O O
LO
LO
O
O
M
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
O
LO
O
LO
r
a
LO
00
N
0)
CC) I`
q;T M
00
I`
r
I`
I`
r
C
LO
r
I`
N
CY)
(D
(D
I`
O
N
LO
I`
r
O
N
I`
LO
O
I�
(D
0)
0)
O
to
M
r
N
It
r
00
N
M
0)
M
(D
N
r
M
M
VJ
C)
(D N
w
r
w
0
a_
cn
C/)
LO r
I`
N
O
LO
I�
q;T
LO
O
r
LO
r
(D
I`
CY)
O
LO
r
(D
O
O LO
Ln d)
00
O
r
00
O
LO
(D
O
O
00
(D
N
00
O
00
1`
(D
(D
00
O
O 0)
di r
O
r
di
O
00
00
6
4
O
4
O
r
r
N
00
O
6
4
r
O
O O
It
O
r
LO
q;T
M
CO
M
M
O
r
LO
N
M
�
M
M
'IT
a
LO
1` 00
q;T
M
I`
G)
LSD
LO
I`
d)
O
00
;T
(D
r
M
N
00
N
00
r
I`
00 I`
M 00
00
O
d7
O
q;T
q;T
�
(D
m
(3)
O
�
O
00
00
1`
(D
r
M
I`
(D O
N
r
00
N
N
r
(D
LO
O
m
co
D)
r
N
CF)
LO
I`
I`
Lid
0) r
r N
M
CY)
M
O
00
q;T
(D
LO
(3)
q;T
d)
(D
1`
CY)
O
LO
N
N
N N
00
�
00
t0
d)
LO
q;T
N
CY)
'IT
N
'IT
N
M
N
0)
O
00
(D LO
I`
M
�"�
LO
(D
q;T
N
N
LO
r
N
LO
r
co
N
r
M
r
'IT
d)
O
r
r
M
O
LO
(D
I`
00
0)
O
O
r
N
�
ti
00
r
�
V
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
0 o
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
O
�
O
O
o
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
I*
o
O
LO
ti
LO
N
o
O O
r
O O
O
O
O
O
O
M
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
O
CY)
It
N
O O
O
LO
O
Ltd
O
lq
O
LSD
Lo
O
Lr)
O
Lo
O
r
Ln
(D
00
O
M �
CD
00
I`
00
O
I`
LO
I`
N
N
I`
r
I`
M
O
M
LO
LO
CD
O M
I`
(D
r
C
N
�
(D
LO
LO
O
O
(D
I`
(D
r
to
(1) (n
00 I`
N
0
�
07
M
L6
N
r
M
LL
M
X
U
00 N
r
m
C:
(�
A
L
a)
cn
CL
—>>
O
a-
a)
>
(1) (n
N
c
a)
LL
°6
X
U
m
C:
(�
m
O
~
t6
F ---
a)
(a
ch
O
O
a)
07
4--
X
C:
} '
LL
a)
LL
cn
cn
>'
p
O
�
X
O
a)
a)
(D
L
N
i--'
O
0
L
m
O
�
LL
c
a)
x N
U
N
x
C
-
c
J
O
16
-
L
t6
a)
m
O
O
X
a)
U
a)
ca
O
—
4-a
VJ
C)
E
w
w
0
a_
cn
C/)
Q
E
in
.-
�
O
J
H
c
O
O
U
w p
U
E
-
0
U
L
N
N
L
(a
(�
+ r
-Fu CLn—
�,
a
E
'cn
°
x=
�
X
L-
o
O
o
a
a) a)
O
p
O
:3
Co
+r
O
to
+r
J
C
to
a)
a)
�
U
U
m
U-
2
0
L
Q
J
a-
u-
U
a-
Q
_
C�
O
O
N
'IT
d)
O
r
N
M
�
LO
(D
I`
00
0)
O
O
r
N
�
ti
00
r
�
V
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
F
M
M
M
M
M
M
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
O
N
� O
O M
C.7
LL
L
C
a)
i
I* M M L1) � O M M a) N M I` ti M I` It CD I` O L1) CD O O
CD C) ofi ti LO LA N (C) O O r it ai LO r (D M I` O � CY) O O
Lc; ti ti cy; (9 c"; o0 M CO N (-i O T M O N O (C) O 00 06 O O
N N r C) ' ' ' � 00 CY) N It It ' O O M '
LO r r
i
T" r
M
O
r
�
�
LO
N
Lt)
00
00
r
r
LO
I`
f`
O
00
LO
M
CD
O O
O O
M N
O
N
(D
O
4-
O
a�
bi)
a
I�
CY)
N
ti
N
(D
It
CD
It
N
It
W)
M
r
O
N
N
It
0)
�
M
�
N
ti
CO
�
CD
Lt
M M
' L
00
LO
M
N
M
M
cM
N
O
N
G
N
M
(D
M
LO
M
tD
r t
r 00
V
a
r
r1�
'
4)
O
M
r
00
Lr)
M
N
le
�
M
O
LO
O
r
'
� m
r
'
N
t0
�
W) 00
ti
r
a-
r
M
I*
�
r
-
M
M
(D
M
CY)
N
L
00
O C
�
!Q N
� r
L
U
M
� r
M
M
cn
O
�
aC4
N
N
r
M
T
N
`~
E
m
tm M
to
U
•>
O
_
N
cn
O
W
N
O
OC
.°
O �,
m
o
O
0
- 0
d
N
d N
E
>
U) +�
m
(A
Q' O
O
O
♦"' Cfl
�
O
U
Cl) o
d
�
4) d
N
cn
S
CM
O
>
L O
LL
L
d
U)
CL
U)
N
>
E
L
�I
••�
O
.O
L.
U
U
a
Q
�
(n 0
v )
O
L-
-
a-
4-j
m
M
O
N
� O
O M
C.7
LL
L
C
a)
i
I* M M L1) � O M M a) N M I` ti M I` It CD I` O L1) CD O O
CD C) ofi ti LO LA N (C) O O r it ai LO r (D M I` O � CY) O O
Lc; ti ti cy; (9 c"; o0 M CO N (-i O T M O N O (C) O 00 06 O O
N N r C) ' ' ' � 00 CY) N It It ' O O M '
LO r r
i
T" r
r
O
r
M
LO
CY)
Lt)
00
00
r
r
LO
I`
f`
O
00
LO
M
CD
O O
O O
M N
O
N
(D
O
LO
(C)
r
I�
CY)
CY)
(D
ti
N
(D
It
CD
It
N
It
W)
M
r
O
N
N
It
0)
�
M
�
N
ti
CO
�
CD
Lt
M M
ti 00
00
LO
M
N
M
M
cM
N
O
N
G
LO
M
(D
M
LO
M
tD
r t
r 00
00
r
r
'
M
I`
M
r
00
Lr)
M
N
le
�
M
O
LO
O
r
'
r
00
r
'
N
t0
r r
C) M M O N Ln � (C) 1� LO I` "t � � (C) m m N O (C) C) O C
N r r CY) � N LO r r � M M QO (D O 0 r N O 00 O p
Ltj M M O N Lt; f` N M f` LO r C)) O o0 O Lf) M O p
CD LO Lt) M N M N C)) 00 c � LO LSD � 00 Lt')
Re M M ti r 1` 'IT (C) O N (D LO M M (D r CY) r O M M O O
CD N N LO L1) O (3) LO LA O N f� O O It M It CY) O N
a) O O r M Lt) O CY) O N M N 00 LO co C)) O r LO W)
M I` CY) CD qm 0 ti I` qm 00 r N O LO C r O
N O O LO CD 0) r r r I` N r 00 O7 N f` 1~ N ti
M Lt') r 00 � (3) LO M
1- O
O
O
O
O
M
�
ti
LO
00
M
Lt)
O
I`
(D
00
O
O
LO
CD
N N
C) O
r
O
O
O
O
I`
O
f`
co
00
It
r
G)
00
M
N
C)
(3)
ti
O
r
O
O
CY)
It
(D
(D
O
r
C)
O
O
r
M
M M
O
Ln
LO
M
00
00
M
ti
M
(3)
LS)
N
LO
00
00
�
L1)
Lr)
to
r t
0) (C)
CD
00
o
00
LO
I`
N
O
00
00
ti
LO
O
(C)
�
rte-
N
tD
r r
W) 00
ti
r
a-
r
M
I*
�
r
-
M
M
(D
M
CY)
N
00
O C
M
U
'>
M
cn
O
r
N
r
M
T
N
`~
E
O
•L
to
U
•>
N
V - r 00 (D W) (D N O (D M r Lt) 00 O LO r N O O CD O O
co 00 00 00 r co O r O) M (D � M r (3) M M � O O O O
M I` 1` (C) N Lr; r O O 4 (C) Lt) Lt's r r 4 O O O O r O O
Ln M M N (D N LO � W) (D r r CY) � (D LO N W)
r
M r r r O r C)) ti C4 O CY) It M 00 (3) 00 CY) It LO (D m O O
CD N N N O N (C) LO N f� N L1) Lt) M M LO M LO N M 00
CD 00 CO N M G) O N M CC) 00 00 M (C) r co LO I` f` CY) (D
CD Lr) Ln r (V 00 00 0 ti 0 (D r 00 N C) f` 00 M ti
O r r (` ' co N r I* N CY) ti CY) LO 00 f` f` (D M
M M M (D co o0 00 � CY) 1` a?
I-f r C\j Cfl
O O
O
O
O
O
M
O
M
O
O
LO
Lt)
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
N
M M
T" O
CD �
O
I*
O
O
O
f`
(D
ti
M
LO
O
O
M
W)
O
00
N
M
00
M
O
W)
O
O
f`
L1)
O
O
r
N
O
O
00
1�
CY) 0)
00 Co
Ln LO
Ln
LO
M
00
00
00
cD
O
L1)
(D
N
(D
00
O
LO
O
O M
ti M
V)
(C)
o
CD
00
q-
M
00
�
CC)
G)
�
O
LO
'IT
'IT
a)
cir)
W) 00
00
N
a-
N
r
N
(D
r
-
N
�
LO
00
CY)
f`
O C
M
U
'>
M
cn
O
r
M
r
M
r
N
`~
E
O
•L
to
U
•>
N
4
N
N
N
4-j
0
o
cn
(n
U
a-
Q
cn
U
'>
cn
O
N
N
cn
`~
E
O
•L
to
U
•>
N
cn
O
O
N
U
CD
- 0
L
N
d N
N
(A
co
O
�
O
• L
O
d
�
N
cn
N
U
CM
O
>
U)
0)
U)
N
Q
0
•
U
(1)
Q
�
(n 0
v )
O
L-
-
a-
4-j
(a
0
—
(_6
m
U
U
>
c i
L
N
m
L
N
cn
O
U
0
• U
�
•U
'L
m
c
-1
O
L
O
O
<i
U)
a-
O
N
'�
O
O
U
O
-6
O
�
• U O
LL
�=
4--
LL
v
•>
O
U
0
U)
O
U)
Q
N
Cl)
O
O
t6
ca
N
m
�
�
N
�
� I
�2S
m
�S
a
�
�
N
cl)
U)
(D
to
U
• t)
to
O
c
0)
CM
N
N
U
N
N
(n
N
+r
U
LL
IL
L
LL
a)
0
O
(a
CD
�_
N
•
N
N
C
N
U-
O
0�
O
0�
U
U
N
O
O
z
cn
+r
O
w
+ r
O
� j
O
N
c
a,
�,
L
E
�•+
a
U-
U
cn
O
O m
O
O
r
O
N
00
O
O
r
CC)
O
O
r
�
co
O
N
(D
O
N O
H M
H
'T
H
'T
'
H
LO
L1)
Lt)
H
(fl
CD
(D
r�
00
00
co
H
O) H
O
O
O
CD
CD
O
CD
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
O
N �-+
� O
O M
N N 00
07 Q� r
CF) 0) ci
r r
N N O
M M
G) O
r N
LO LO O
C N
� r M
M M G7
ti
(D to G7
~ ~ co co
to
CD
co co I*
N N M
pp GO f`
c
r
C) O t-
oo 0o r
N N
V- r M
� O �
C O M
O CD CD
, I - I* ti
O (D t0
(D t0 M
r-.- LO
Lr) LO r
1` N
Lt's
O
r
fA
W
N
L
r N �
F-
F
(3) F- f►
C)
LL
L
C
a)
i
M
�
N
�
(Q
4-
O
a�
bi)
a
N
' L
_N
V
a
4)
O
d
N m
L
�
!Q N
� r
L
U
� r
M
�
aC4
N
m
O
_
W
O
OC
.o
O 2,
m
o
O
E-
�
m
Q' O
O
♦..� cfl
U
Cl) O
4) d
S
L O
LL
L
d
CL
E
L
�I
••�
O
.O
L.
U
a
d
m
M
O
N �-+
� O
O M
N N 00
07 Q� r
CF) 0) ci
r r
N N O
M M
G) O
r N
LO LO O
C N
� r M
M M G7
ti
(D to G7
~ ~ co co
to
CD
co co I*
N N M
pp GO f`
c
r
C) O t-
oo 0o r
N N
V- r M
� O �
C O M
O CD CD
, I - I* ti
O (D t0
(D t0 M
r-.- LO
Lr) LO r
1` N
Lt's
O
r
fA
W
N
L
r N �
F-
F
(3) F- f►
C)
LL
L
C
a)
i
0
� M
C
Ui
L
d
i
O
INC
M
\O
C1
M
l-
d
V
O
Cl)
N
1 10
I�t
N
O (�
't
C1
M
�
M
N
a1
01
01
N
kn
\O
kn
00
O
kn
`0
kn
O
O
l- I�t
o0
N
'
a�
•-�
'
v
t-
^�
O
o0
O
In
M
INC
'
\O
N
O
M
01
_N
`O
a1
N
o0
C1
t�
o0
kr�
V
a
t�
kn
el
`O
`O
t
C1
M
\O
kn
O
In O
N
a1
M
o}'
m
N
N
O
kn
00
t�
a1
r
N
'IT
�
't
X _
W W m
`O
L
a1
M
0
01
oo
O
O M
t�
kn
00
01
�
I
V
O
a1
r
M
N
� V
IV
N
N
`O
-
N
L
.-�
M
O
M
N
O
O
00 `O
In o0
M
01
\O
N
L
r_
x C
W W
01
kn
I�c
L
C
T
\O
N
M
M
O
N
kn N
V
r
r
W
N
r
I�t
r-
•tm
'�
'
U
�
`O
N
M
N
m
/
L
PJ t�
C
0
�
W
0
0
O
W
a
O
@
=
a 0
O
X m
W W fA
O
V
CD
o
N
LJL
d �
0
L
.O
W W
a
o�
E
c
♦+
m
L
E
O
u
0
� M
C
Ui
L
d
i
O
INC
O
M
\O
C1
M
l-
I�
O
Cl)
N
M
1 10
I�t
N
M
O
't
C1
M
�
M
N
a1
01
01
N
kn
\O
kn
00
O
kn
`0
kn
O
O
l- I�t
o0
N
'
�.c
•-�
'
M
t-
^�
O
o0
O
In
M
INC
'
\O
N
O
M
01
`O
`O
a1
N
o0
C1
t�
o0
kr�
a1
kn
el
`O
`O
t
C1
M
\O
kn
O
In O
N
a1
M
In
C\
N
N
O
kn
00
t�
a1
O
'IT
�
't
01
`O
I�t
a1
M
a1
01
oo
O
O M
t�
kn
00
01
�
I
01
O
a1
r
M
M
M
IV
M
N
`O
-
N
N
.-�
M
O
M
N
O
O
00 `O
In o0
M
01
\O
N
M
01
01
kn
I�c
C
�
\O
N
M
M
O
N
kn N
'
M
i
`O
I�t
r-
N
'�
'
U
N
`O
N
M
N
O
kn
a
PJ t�
kn \O O M M M N N I�t O � �z of 01 `O � `O In O t� \0
0 M O O kn kn r- I�t r- M N oo N N oo O r- 01 00
M
M kn I�t kn kn M kn kn k kn 00 In
M O 00 rl M � O N N `O - T-.I 01 N M o0 o0 O I�t M O O � `O
\O � In O t 00 0 `C 1 10 kn 1 1C M � oo I�t kn o0 oo O T.-O I�t
M O 00 I� I� 01 M M O N � O O O N O M M O 00 O
00 r \O � \1 6 M M r In k n lzl l N 01 N O M 00 M M
-� kn 00 In 00 00 t M r"a \O N N M t� \O 01 C1 M '"a 00 t� O a1
M M r--I N N
00 \0 ^� rl ^m� I�t O O - c In t M M � O \O � O � N � I�t
N In M r"� N 01 M O 00 00 O kn 00 N N M t- N
M r r- O ---a r INC kn M N 01 01
M � I�t I�t kn I�t ' 't 't kn 't I�t M 00 I�t
� In T-.I 00 rl I�t �10 �10 O In \O 't � N 01 � M o4 O � Cl)
N � `C T 0 kn I�t N kn It � � C1 O
`D o0 00 M t� N C1 M I�t r- � M a1 l-- 00 l-- a1 C1 N \O O M a1
^� kn N M 00 O In O 01 01 N C1 \O O 00 O
N 00 a1 � I�t o0 oo 't kn
00 `C I�t N
M M r--O kn
O
O
O
M
`O
N
M
l-
M
00
kn
a1
00
t-
kn
N
O
kn
00
�t
M
00
O
kn
kn
O
o0
kn
�
o0
kn
�
\C
O
kn
`0
O
O
O
O
C1
O
In
N
�.c
\O
M
t-
r---o
O
o0
00
00
M
O
kn
M
00
O
`O
kn
`O
00
a1
N
o0
C1
t�
o0
kr�
a1
kn
el
`O
`O
t
C1
M
\O
kn
O
In O
N
M
o0
N
I�t
M
In
C\
N
N
O
kn
00
kn
O
I�t
-
kn
'IT
�
't
`C
\O
kn
1--+
o0
M
O
N
00
00
kn
.o
--�
o0
--�
N
C1
O ^�
t�
t-
N
N
.--a
M
.--a
00
In
en
-1
N
.-�
N
...�
k�K
N
C1 N
00 \0 ^� rl ^m� I�t O O - c In t M M � O \O � O � N � I�t
N In M r"� N 01 M O 00 00 O kn 00 N N M t- N
M r r- O ---a r INC kn M N 01 01
M � I�t I�t kn I�t ' 't 't kn 't I�t M 00 I�t
� In T-.I 00 rl I�t �10 �10 O In \O 't � N 01 � M o4 O � Cl)
N � `C T 0 kn I�t N kn It � � C1 O
`D o0 00 M t� N C1 M I�t r- � M a1 l-- 00 l-- a1 C1 N \O O M a1
^� kn N M 00 O In O 01 01 N C1 \O O 00 O
N 00 a1 � I�t o0 oo 't kn
00 `C I�t N
M M r--O kn
O
O
kn
t�
M
o0
00
In
N
1 -.0
`0
N
00
0o
M
`O
00
t-
M
N
00
l-
M
�
O
�
tn
t
1--+
�
M
00
M
N
O
O
O
O
T--I N
00 00
In
N
�.c
O
�
t-
r---o
O
---a
N
�O
M
N
00
M
cn , ..
kn
N
�D
l�
\C
N
lzl
kr�
0
el
kr
M
C1
k
N
M
01
N
M
00
O
N
O
N
O
I�t
M
M
kn
In
kn
\O
to
O
N
t
kn
N
`O
O
-
N
en �10
t�
t-
N
N
r--a
M
---a
o0
T
M
7:)
N
T-�
v
N
N M N M N M 't k O M I�t \O 00 O ^�
N N N M M M M M It It It �t kn `O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O
O
cn , ..
c
0
7 �
cH
°'�
O
7:)
v
O
O
4 �--�
W
�
O
C
i
w
U O
'�
w
U
.�
C5 a w
•�
a
rn a
a
N M N M N M 't k O M I�t \O 00 O ^�
N N N M M M M M It It It �t kn `O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
M
N
0
N
l--a
a� v
t�
N
L
V
U)
LL
L
V
L �
L
E T
V r
r M
W N
t
' L
0 � W
O 0
X a
O 4a
O
� a �
O t4
�..� O
� L
LL
L
m Q
� L
O O
a
E
cn
L
tQ
E
O
u
O
� M
d
4
O
�L
o �
N
V
a
� M —
E 0 m
X _
W W 0 m
N
N
d V
L
}1 L
C E
x C
W W
ca
d
m
.0 O
= E
X
W W 0 m
ca m
N
N
L =
C E
d �
� v
x _
W W
W
m
C
LL
L
d
i
0�
t�
00
INC
�T
O
00
.c
kn
o0
00
o0
00
I�t
o
In
a1
•--a
O
kn
O
r-
N
\O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
M
�lo
INC
kn
N
'IT 00
•--O I�z
01
M
O
M
-
N
M
1 4
M
�
M
M
O
In
r-
M
M
o0
O M
lzl
O
00
N
1
N
01
O
o0
kr
oo
�z
N
`O
'
M
N
M
oo
---a
00
O
00
M
O
M
In
kn
't
O
In
00
INC
N
M
O
C\
N M
^�
M
\c
N
M
N
r-
O
M
In
N
kn
�t
Q1
kn
N
o0
�
kn
�lc
O
M
O
O
In
O
O
O
N
In M
r
\O
00
O
tr�
llc�
N
tr�
N
k
00
M
N
M
r�
M
N
'
M
'
N
kn
N
t-
I
kn
I
kn
rl
N
r
oo
!--
�T
C\ O
o0
INC N M C1 O N M In t� a1 O of O O O \C N
O N 00 N 00 "C 00 O O O 00
\O o0 00 kn O kn 00 O I� 0 kn O In oo M o0 00
't � kn N M o0 In �t - rm� kn M kn M M
In
O
O
r--I
C\
�
N
N
r-
O
-
O
O
00
O
O
r-
01
00
-
N
�
INC
O O
O
O
�
N
N
M
O
C1
N C1
\z l-
00 'IT
N
INC
O
M
-
O
N
It
`O
�
r
O
O
In
r-
\O
M M
�n
a1
lzl
O
00
00
1
N
01
O
o0
kr
O
�z
N
`O
C\ N
oc
N
\O
oo
---a
00
O
00
M
O
M
In
kn
't
O
In
00
INC
N
M
O
C\
N M
^�
M
\c
N
\z l�
'IT Iz
M
In
M
N
N
'IT
N
N
In
00
kn
kn
M
N
O
0
1 1.0
N
o0
kn
oo
O
O
IO
M
1 -10
o0
M
o0
kn
kn
O
O
O
O
O
O
o0
l--
N
�
M
\O
M
N
\z l-
00 'IT
N
INC
O
M
C1
---a
`0
M
O
O
C1
O
O
\O
M
'
O
IV M
lzl
M
00
t�
t�
kn
In
C1
O
N
O
O
N
N
a1
oc
kn
M
O
M
01
N
M
l-
r�
N
o0
N
o0
�
kn
't
O
O
C)
INC
�
N
M
\c
N
o0
\z l�
'IT Iz
M
In
O
N
N
V
l--
7=
O
O
M
on
N
M
00
on C1
kn oo �10 N N - C k� a1 N o 0 0 � M 11.0 CIS �o
t� 00 a1 O M a1 N O O O M .--a on a1
N 01 �O O M kn rl .--a N o0 r- V7 0o M C1 M
\O N M 00 N kn N kn N M
N N kn O Q1 N kn kn INC O O O 00 `O .--a 00 �O
� 00 O O rm� � � 1 1C N kn C\ N
M \C O o0 1 1.0 \c N N N It �T \O t oo O O M r N O r-� llc� cr \C In
O `O M kn N 01 C1 ---a N o0 O M r--a In C1
N � 00 It
^� N \C �O
N N �O
01
r
00
INC
C\
N
O
I�t
00
N
N
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
N
N
O
O
O
O
O
o0
00
l--
N
N
M
01
I�t
N
t- t-
•--O 1 %O
l�
r--�
oo
l�
l�
O
M
O
O
't
M M
lzl
N
N
o0
M
kn
l
N
O
O
oo
N
�
kr
l lrj
01
N
00
M
00
t
M
00
O
o0
I�t
M
00
C)
INC
�
00
O
00 �--�
T--I N
M
O
N
N
V
l--
7=
O
O
lzl
00
N
M
00
00 C1
O
O~
�
i
p
7�
r--j
':;
C)
O
)
W
y
7=
°
r--
L
l
U
,ct
A-a
O
U
° U O
W U
W Q
N
U
rA
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O
O
00 00
O O
o0
O
00
O
00
O
o0
O
o0
O
O
00
O
01
O
O
01 C1
O O
O
MI-1 M LN lei
ITEM NO. K -7
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: January 22, 2013
AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid — December 2012
SUBMITTED BY: Rebecca E. Owens
Director of Finance
APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Direct Deposit Checks Total
Payments to Vendors $ - $ - $ 7
Payroll 12/07/12 1 09 59 1
Payroll 12/21/12 1 87,897.38 1
Manual Checks - 392.30 392.30
Grand Total $ 9,730,339.33
A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors.
UA lowelWilei
ITEM NO. K -8
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: January 22, 2013
AGENDA ITEM: Report of Claims Activity for the Self- Insurance Program
SUBMITTED BY: Donald R. Karnes
Risk Manager
APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman I I I
County Administrator �.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
In accordance with the Self- Insurance Program, Ordinance 0- 061494 -6, Section 2 -86.C,
attached is the Fiscal Year to Date claims activity report including the Second Quarter that
ended December 31, 2012. Attachment A — Auto, Attachment B — General Liability.
Page 1 of 1
LO
O�
z z
O
O
N
�
c7i
w C
>. C 00
LL G (D
LO
M
LO
O
r
M
I
N
>-
V 0
00
N
N
>
,
w
W
U)
W
w
U)
❑
C
C
C
C
C
C
N
N
ch
N
N
N
cn
cn
N
N
N
cn
cn
0
0
CL
Om
Om
�j
O
O
O
O
O
O
U
U
U)
W
W
W
I /� . • . � L //
N /�•�//
/�•�//
LJ
CU
c
/
LJ�
C:
/
LJ�
/
I.J.
/
LJ�
/
LJ�
�
LL
G O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N Q
�
�
�
U Q >
>
>
>
>
>
r
cn
c
cn
W
m ;
m
F O
U
W
Q
>
L
^'
CL W
O
N cu
U
Lu cu
L
am
_
0
cn
cn C
(�
4--
N
W N U
1
O
:3
L
•V
W
1
L
M
W r
^'
V >
L
in
�
a1
_ 1
L)
cu
a)
O N
DL
Cl) N
_0
O
U
L
N
0
cu
Q E
N
•
in
U
cu
N
)
>
O
4—j
r
Q CU
O
+�
�C
1
U
in
.4.,
O
-0
N
L
L
in
—
-a
C
U
:3
L
0)
^'
4-0
W
w J a
cn �
L
4-0
z U
-
L
N
N
in
O
Z 0 L
c
CU
�
DL
v
in
- D
cn
(11
+�
O
O
0O
L
0-
O
:3
%
} '
cn
>
Z
-
W
} a
4-a
- a ❑
o>
0-
o
cn
_�
0
-0
Q
L
N
O
Q.
L
O
O
N
W
F- W 0)
C
O
O
O
O
O,
O
ch
:3
❑ C
cn • 1
O
C
C
C
�
C
C
U
U U
L
(�
1
U
U
�
U
�
U
�
�
O
U
O
a
L
^'
W <( m
I..1_
m
V J
m
m
G
G
U)
J
J
<
a
0
v
�
z
a
z
v
W
•
L � cn
in
L
cn
cn
in
r cu
c
W
cu
cu
^ �
a.
- 0
- D
- 0
- 0
cn
0
U
U
U
U
U
—
L
-
❑
W O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
ca
O
z
❑ U)
0-
U)
a.
a.
U)
U)
U)
a.
a.
U)
Q
W
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
>
W O
LJJ
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
W
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
U)
ti
O
O
M
O
ti
N
O
O
M
W
V
M
M
N
O
N
N
N
Q ti
ti
f`
M
O
O
O
r
00
W
O
O
O
O
r
O
Q
O
L
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
M
O
M
O
m
O
LO
O
LO
O
O
i
0
_
0 M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
�
�
Z
U N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
W
Z
C)
o
w
o
0-
>
w
w
U)
w
w
U)
U)
N
�
U) Z_
N
Q
J ❑
r
M
U Q
W
m
H
�
QC
W
O
CL
w
C)
w
o
o�
W
W
Cy
r
H
J
H
o
—
F-
N
Q
LU
J
Q
V
Q
o�
M
Cj)
Z
L
• •
w
F
z z
w °
ca �_
U)
w
J
LU
(n
O
~
❑
z
Q
W
U
J
a
Q U)
J
V
O
z
cn
w
�
Q
w
❑
J
U
O
z
Q
z
Q
z
w W
C)
U ❑ <
Q
U)
w
w
w
z
U
O
w
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. K -9
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DA'Z'E: January 22, 2013
AGENDA ITEM: Quarterly Report— Community Development Activities
SUBMITTED BY: Tarek Moneir
Deputy Director of Development Services
APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Attached is a summary report of Community Development Activities for the second quarter
of 2012-2013. The statistics in the attached spreadsheet represents monthly stats of
various activities in community development. It compares the average of the first three
months of the fiscal year 2013 with the total average of last year's inspections, plan
reviews and building and ESC inspections performed by Staff. We also included stats of
zoning inspections, business licenses, complaints and other code compliance.
You will note that some of these stats are reported as "NA" for not available indicating that
we cannot collect such data on a monthly basis due to the complexity of the process.
This report is only for information and does not require any board action. Analysis of these
figures can be provided upon request.
Page 1 of 1
to
a,
Q
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
r M rn rM-I
Q1 r
O1 r -
r M rn rMl O
^ O C1 ^ C1 C1 N 00
>'
M 00 -0
�+ O
O p�
of
rAj z v W
L
° � i p Lr1
O=
N
al V
a O
p a.' a N `O
N
H i,i lfl a
J
a, w
�, ► a a v CL a
v s3 o
O p
c N
4- X
a s
i
a
_a
CL C - r3 m Q
4' m Q
m
v� �+
c c
a a L
��
u
U
a
Ln
i6 4�
L N
Ln :3 u
..
z
Q O ' Q
I►
Ln
zzz
3
z CL O
ON
00 �
� N
N O
4- - -
N O w
N
N�
� 00 N
r-
N O t.0
N
M N M k.0 m
� N Ln qt N
O
to
s to
M
r M rn rM-I
Q1 r
O1 r -
r M rn rMl O
^ O C1 ^ C1 C1 N 00
>'
M 00 -0
�+ O
J
L N
L �
\
I
00 �
� N
N O
N O w
N
N�
� 00 N
r-
N O t.0
N
M N M k.0 m
� N Ln qt N
O
l
W
M N
N IZT O
rl rl
O L11
rl rl
00 O 00
rl rl
N 00
rl rl
O L!1 O
rl rl
rl rl
M
lD
�+ O
rl 00 rl rl
N
O N
H
♦"� 0 M
RT W
M N
O 111 tD r-1
r-1
q* 00 w
ri N r-1
N
r-1 r-1
0 I- M
r-1 00 r-1
cn r-I N
V-1
r N O 0 00 r tD r-1 Ln
M � M r-1
N - 0
ri
0 ;
qT L n �
�
L M
L
N
M 00
N
M N
111 N M 00
� O tD
00 D1
O
00 I�
m 01 00
Ll1 h
ri N
M N V
M N al 00 ^ W N
N N tD N
N O
O� O
_
�+ O
rM-1
Ln
N M v-1 N
O N
H
L L
L
�+ bjO
RT R*
N
00 00 ri
r-I N R
N
M 4 * M
00 r-1 �
O N ri
M O N N N 01
N
4* M
O i Cr
M
ri ri
C ri r-1
N V-1
ri
O O tD (n 00 N
M M
G ; N
G
a
to
L
L
O i
(�
NO c
N
rl M
N c-I N
N N
M 00 9 :3 1
rl 00
M
CY
N
N N �
`� N L n M
M
0 N N 0000 � .� lD I�
� rl 00 N N lD N
NO O
O
N M N
rl
0
U
cl
I
N M r N
O
r-I L 00 N
r- O
00 rl rl
M Ln
O rl rl
O 00
rl Ln Ol
- O
r-I O N O
' ' a a a a a a
O 00 Z Z Z Z Z Z
Lrn
N N
0
L
}' M
L
�
N
o
Q) M
M N
w 0, r�
� 00 q
N rl
o M�
00 N
I
�, N �,
a a a a a a
Z Z Z Z Z Z
O M
Z
rl
rl rl
M
� N
U
u
O r-
9:1
w N w�
N r- 00
rI Lr) 0,
w M r-
��� N
00 q* a a a a a a
N o
O
N
l l
r M r
r l
00 N
rl
O rq Z Z Z Z Z Z
M
aJ a)
O_ a c Ln
c N
O c OJ
p c +-J
+ +
c6 O
in
c OJ aJ V)
v v
E p
_�
°J
O Q
a a —
0j
U +� o
=3 IE3 Ln
U ++ o
L
o
c ca
aj l aj
E • i
+� �, a a)
Ln
E
O
Q
N
_0 ai
C Q U
C Q N
a O
01 0� OJ Q cn O
V Q 0C Q O O L
J
0
+�
aj
c
o
aj
a, >
f
v Q
ai
� Q
a,
>
aj O
U
a, +�
Lu Q o o N
c
aj
z
z L
0
v
V)
=
p aj
m a
.�
+�
v
ai
_�
a
w H
m U Ln
— c
i
L
c aj
o
L
b-0 1„ o
=
o
aj
a
c �n
a
W A
�
aj
cn L A
N p
IV
0l
W
aj aj
c
U
O ~
co
Ln
~
0 -0
U
V
4-1
E
v
E
E
Uo
U
z
o
L
ai a
D. aj
i
Ln
_vi
tA 4 - J
.�
E E
L L
aj
H
3
•>
a
a
E
°'
d
++
U
G
L N
a =
E
u
U
++
U
Q
M
r-I
O
N
N
r-I
0
N
to
a
C
a
E
0.
0
cu
>
cu
OJ
E
L
m
CL
ai
aJ
E
CL
0
a,
a
c
O
O
Q
aJ
L
L
Cf
E
a�
c
m
O
U
aJ
S?
Ln
c
L
O
Q
OJ
L
O
m
Q
O
V)
a)
/
L
a)
c
O
E
Ln
/
L
a)
Ln
U
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. L -1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: January 22, 2013
AGENDA ITEM: Work session to discuss fiscal year 2013 -2014 budget
development
SUBMITTED BY: Brent Robertson
Director of Management and Budget
APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This time has been set aside to provide an update on fiscal year 2013 -2014 budget
development. An overview of the following areas will be presented for discussion:
• Review mid -year expenditures at 12/31/12 (operating departments)
• Update on current year (fiscal year 2012 -2013) revenue projections
• Preliminary review of major expenditure issues related to fiscal year 2013 -2014 budget
development
Page 1of1
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. L -2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: January 22, 2013
AGENDA ITEM: Work session to discuss the Catawba Sustainability Center
Report
SUBMITTED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III
County Administrator
APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
During this work session, Dr. Kay Dunkley, Director of the Virginia Tech Roanoke Center
and Josh Nease will present to the BoS an update on the ongoing, scheduled and future
programs and events scheduled at the Catawba Sustainability Center (CSC).
Dr. Dunkley provides administrative oversight to the CSC. Mr. Nease is the new manager
for the CSC.
Roanoke County and Virginia Tech entered into a Partnership to promote the use of
approximately 377 acres of prime farmland located in the Catawba Valley and both persons
wish to provide the BoS with this update on the CSC.
The CSC is a showcase for university education and engagement with the local community
- a place to practice, demonstrate, learn, and teach about sustainability issues (from green
building and construction to low -input agricultural production to water quality to onsite
energy production to community -based business development) that affect our world today
and into the future.
Dr. Dunkley and Mr. Nease plan to talk about the Growers Academy, Homestead Learning
Series, Catawba Valley Farmers Market, Farmfest/Harvest Fest to be conducted at the
CSC, and Celebrate Catawba Day. They will also provide updates on the 2013 Farmland
Lease program at CSC. Other items to be discussed are the future involvement of Virginia
Tech faculty at the CSC and other plans.
Page 1of1
L
4�J
(1)
U
� L
also
W
UL U
cu
� Y
w O
O
U cz
0)
�1 ~
�c
U
f�
1
i
1
ro
fa
4=J
m
U
1
1
�u
1
1
cn
U �
4-J V
fa �
L i
Ln
N �
� O
4mJ
ca
N U
O };
ca �
N
Q� f�
(on
U
O
O
U
N
ca
w
i
I
tlr 11
Sri ir
L
�
4=J
F
�
s
U
U
�
4=J
N
a�
4=J
•�
o
4�J
0
4=J
�
L
O
f6
�
4�J
U
cn
U �
4-J V
fa �
L i
Ln
N �
� O
4mJ
ca
N U
O };
ca �
N
Q� f�
(on
U
O
O
U
N
ca
w
i
I
tlr 11
Sri ir
F
s
m _
F ;.
r'S 4-J
� O � V 1�1D
r"+4 0
V
E Ln
Ln
w 0 >
(1) z E
+Mj w Ln
< w
E con
0
� m
U
oJ�mm v v
cu
4=J
E
con 0 0 CD
0 u Mo cc
t�i� U
0
Ln
rll**4 u 0 0
r�l u
0 Ln � v o �,�v
\ SOO, � a '� a te,
0 u
0
0 0 0
V) U
u 0 C: FMZM Ln
Ln (1)
C[J '0 X to c +mj >
N.,00 (1) (1) m +Mj
> =3 0
0 4-J
� Q }' O N (1) (1) U
+=O
ft4
0
ry > (L) Om
4�J Vl UP) +J
r4 u
U 0
0 Q)
r**4
(1) � fp O
C: ) m
C: m 4-J Q) >
� U �i v w }' �� Q
O 4=J�
0
U
0
C6
en
X
(1)
C6
4=J
(1)
N
CAA
ca
ca
0
U
4�J
(1)
SOO
C6
G
L
C6
LLM
f6
C6
C6
U
r*4
r-i
O
rAq
s
0
a,o
c
C�
N j
r-I (1)
O
Ul
N �
r-I �
� L
L
Q�
0
+=j o
U
OO
0
I
n
� I
� o
� m
� m
w
ie� .
4
• •
1
t �-
hL
Y
v
o
Ln
m
0
U
v
c�
�
N
vi
L
0
4=J
0
L
O
0
�o
�o
E
N
O
co
Y
>
0
O
�
N
L
Ln
L
2
�
Ln
�
0
N
.
V)
0
V)
0
Ql
j
�
co
O
cn
�
J
W
>
• •
1
t �-
hL
Y
o
C:
m
0
v
c�
�
Q
L
0
O
N
co
�
O
O
2
�
U
�
V)
0
'0
0
Q
J
W
>
• •
1
t �-
hL
Y
4�J
(1)
SOO
C6
G
C6
C6
C6
U
�
m
w
>
CD
�
r*4
LLM
C6
C6
C6
U
r
J
41 4 !1
w
>
q -, .M
'A r.
Ln
0
0
E
Ln
�
C
�
>
Ln
O
rp
�
m
cn
L
C
+=j
U
E
:D
O
0
o
Ln
o
=3
Q0
H G�
'o
�o
O
+1
N
�
r�l
C:
4mJ
0
4=J
E
G >
0
0
4=J
u
u
0
4-J
0
�
�
m
U
�
4J
U
�
a1
c-I
I
U
>
�
�
i
E
�N
�
� (1)
Q
L
v
(1)
D
�
E
d
0
2
ro
0
r
J
41 4 !1
N
Q�
� � N
O
4=J
bn
E u
4mJ E r**4
0
0
r*4
4=J
Ln
Ln v
> �
v
. . .
un
L
C
U
4�J
O
U
ca
ca
U
s
ca
4�J
f6
f6
4�J
f6
U
L
N
f6
�
fa
Q
4—J
Q
0
�
O
U
U
(D
4�J
f6
f6
4�J
f6
U
L
N
f6
�
fa
Q
bn
Q
0
�
fa
Q
(D
X
s
Cl)
+m'
4�J
f6
f6
4�J
f6
U
L
N
fa
Q
bn
Q
0
�
4�J
f6
f6
4�J
f6
U
Ul
ro
0
4mJ
U
Q
u
L
+-�
(A
x
4mJ
6
(1)
0
Ln
0)
0
>
4mJ
f0
a--+
4-J
=3
�
t
U
L
M
C7
E
Ln
>
ro
C:
0
0
0
0
Ln
E
�
i
u
w
0
Ln
Ln
con
Fm
N
0
E
>
dj
�
U
as
N
0
O
cv
+.+
�
FMZM
>
O
O
cv
N
in
in
N
�
•
•
•
•
N
r—I
O
N
0
c�
2
� C
N cp
i
(B
ro
cn U
0
L {n
O
m
• •
M
r—I
O
N
` , ,
All
Ln
4 -j
O
N
�
U
�
LA
L
�
�
=3
Ln
4�J
�
(1)
E
O
U
�
�
U
bz
N
4A
2
Ln
�
O
�
'0
4�J
H
+J
v
O
oC
>
Q
�
�
O
U
�
�
N
�
fa
4.J
C6
4 "'
J
�
�
4�J
N
r—I
O
N
0
c�
2
� C
N cp
i
(B
ro
cn U
0
L {n
O
m
• •
M
r—I
O
N
` , ,
All
• •
Ln
U
�
U
f0
�
LA
W
0
Ln
�
(1)
E
O
L
�
=
�
U
t6
O
2
Ln
E
'0
N
H
�
oC
>
Q
• •
0 0 6�
� s C: w E
0 (1) S/ 0
=3 E 0 u
� o Q
0 � C�
u �c §�
+=) M C�
(1) c
Fzm >
to U
w 0
�r
C � 0 N �
U LL
N � V � N �
f6 N U L
0 0
0 V)
4mJ E (3 r 4l *4
O � V � � V U �
0 Ln
Ln
4-1 '0
ul
v � 2 0 � a � :E
m O O
N • • N
•
Lr)
fa
i
4A
O
L
LLM
fa
1
W
W
U
N
1
• O
r 1
U
cn
U
+Mj
f
v
w
fa
M
r-I
O
N
N
r-I
U
i
f6
G
N
N
i
ca
ca
a�
ca
U
Q
cn
i
N
O
(D
RZI
Q
U
E
o
12 a_
to m
o
0 .V
c� b.0
n � a
n
W
V
V
a
cn
. — cn
v
to
b m
a
(U
(U
�: V
00 C:
m
0
N
0
L
Q�
z
Jc:
U
L
G
tJ')
m Qj
bn
L
Q�
L
Q�
J
C6
N
N
O
2
-1-j
aj
1
` 0
V )
n �
W
x
W
0
V)
` n V 1
r
V 1
1
r �
hn v
>
■
MA
aj ■
r >
L-
4U
O
bm
V) C:
o aj
(U
a1
-
okk
V I
0 C:
CU �
� .0
v U
O
V)
L/) V
Co M
V m
> Ln
O v
:E c:
M
O
N
Ekk
O
CL
>
.0
0
p
�
w
V
—
O
>,
U
i •—
0
c�
I
cn
U
>
'—
>
O
p
E
cn
=3
try
O
U
cn
0)
w
..
a�
U
oC
W
p
- 0
.
�
0 �
�
E
E V
V
=3
cn
4�
4) -
O
- 0 c�
LL
C)
W .0
V) 3:
a--
L4n
CU (�
(1)
>
c�
M
1
O
.
4) ca
c�
M
O
Q
�U
cn 4�
=
0
LL
�
Q
r,j
4-)
D aM
N
�
0
DC
� �'
�
M
4 .j
cn
Q
Q
E
E
L
O
a--)
ca
U
cn
E
co
-
> 4�
N
-
U
> U
U
U
co
LL
LL
I
to
I I
to
I
I
LL
I
I
1 A
0
solo
LL
w
W
N �
0
a
c � U V f6
Noo
L w
� V � O
4—J
LLM
Lon 0 Ln
(1) (1) Ln
0 >
LL 0
N � J
4�J
f� 4�J
L 4�J
0
0
4=J
0
0
0�
m
c�
4=J
�
FMZM
o
0
0
u
ro
u
L4r)
ro
u
Ln
u
u
con
"
a
0N
U
U
0
E ro
H
Z
m
� m
0
4-J r%4
N
� O r�i
4-J 0
� N U
0
4mJ
U S � m
LL L 4�J
� O
cu �
CC= �
a a
J
� N
'L U
N �
� �O
� L
w too
N �
UD
c �
ca �
Q �
�
con
LLM
F=
ton
0 Ul
ca �
� W
� W
� U
�
u U
c6 O �
LL
bn
U �
� � W
� O
0
txo
v U
L
O }' O �
U +J v 4mJ �
w i •� i C
U D U O O
LL < OLM
0 0 Ln
4=J
a
LAO
N
i
U
i
N
U
L/)
U
O
N
t�A
.
N
a�
ro
�o
�
r%4
N �
aJ
Ln C
N 8 ��
N
Ln
a�
O
(1)
t�A
cB
c
ca
Ln
v �
o
U �
� O
N C
ro
L
0 �
C/1 ro
C
>. O
ro a--'
� U
ro i
N }'
N
O
O v
� N
•
�o
ca
� O
ro
� O
nn
� U
Mo �
� O
•
N
i
U
ca
ro
U
F�m
0
O
(1)
N
U
f6
4.J
ro
a ��
bM (3)
6�
N O
N
�
(L)
U
�
L
�
(3)
L41
UO
0
U
Q
b4O
u
N
�
�
0
D
rmi
O
0
i
rlk*4
0
N
�
L
L
Q
4=J
E
N
�
i
U
U
�
�
UO
LL
un
>
m
N
(3)
4=J
�
.
4=J
N
cn
Q�
LAO
N
i
U
i
N
U
L/)
U
O
N
t�A
.
N
a�
ro
�o
�
r%4
N �
aJ
Ln C
N 8 ��
N
Ln
a�
O
(1)
t�A
cB
c
ca
Ln
v �
o
U �
� O
N C
ro
L
0 �
C/1 ro
C
>. O
ro a--'
� U
ro i
N }'
N
O
O v
� N
•
�o
ca
� O
ro
� O
nn
� U
Mo �
� O
•
N
i
U
ca
ro
U
F�m
0
O
(1)
N
U
f6
4.J
ro
a ��
bM (3)
6�
N O
N
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 22, 2013
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN
CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a
closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance
with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.2 -3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the
Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was
conducted in conformity with Virginia law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each member's knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements
by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution
applies; and
2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the
closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia.
Page 1of1
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. 0-1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: January 22, 2013
AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing and adoption of a Resolution on the Plantation
Road Transportation Alternatives Program grant application,
Hollins Magisterial District
SUBMITTED BY: Megan G. Cronise
Principal Planner
APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
County staff is proposing to submit a Transportation Alternatives Program grant application
for improvements to Plantation Road. The Transportation Alternatives Program provides
eighty percent (80 %) Federal funding for a twenty percent (20 %) local match for
improvements to non - motorized transportation that enhance the public's traveling
experience, revitalize communities and improve the quality of life. The program is
administered through the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT).
The project scope covers Plantation Road from Interstate 81 to Williamson Road (US Route
11). The proposed improvements include sidewalks, pedestrian signals and crosswalks,
bicycle accommodations, street trees, pedestrian - scaled lighting, a Hollins community
identification sign, landscaping at Interstate 81, landscaped medians and drainage
improvements. Shared -use trails are also planned for portions of Friendship Lane,
Plantation Road, Walrond Drive, Enon Drive, Hitech Road and McConnell Road.
This project initiates four (4) of seventeen (17) Implementation Strategies identified in the
Hollins Area Plan, adopted November 11, 2008. The Hollins Area Plan is a component of
the 2005 Roanoke County Community Plan. This project also completes portions of two
bikeway routes identified in the 2012 Bikeway Plan for the Roanoke Valley Area
Metropolitan Planning Organization and proposes additional connections to the Tinker
Page 1 of 3
Creek Greenway as it is identified in the 2007 Roanoke Valley Conceptual Greenway Plan.
The pedestrian improvements planned are also supported by the Virginia Department of
Transportation Policy for Integrating Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations.
Roanoke County was awarded $341,000 in Transportation Enhancement funds by the
Commonwealth Transportation Board last June for Phase 1. The twenty percent (20 %) t
Roanoke County match was $85,250 for a total of $426,250. The match funding included
$27,500 in Roanoke County In -Kind Services, $28,880 from the Economic Development
Authority and $28,880 from Roanoke County Economic Development Public Private
Partnership funds. Phase 1 features include:
• Landscaped medians and left turn lanes;
• Pedestrian crossings;
• Shared use paths off of Plantation Road;
• Entrance landscaping; and
• Welcome sign with landscaping.
Funding is currently being requested for Phase 2 which includes the following
improvements:
• Sidewalks;
• Street trees in landscaped strips;
• Pedestrian - scaled lights;
• Bicycle accommodations;
• Shared use path along a portion of Plantation Road; and
• Storm drains, curb and gutter.
The total cost for Phase 2 improvements is approximately $2,449,946.
$1,316,841 in VDOT /Roanoke County Revenue Sharing fund balances transferred to
Plantation Road will cover over half of the funding for Phase 2. The balance is $1,133,105
and the required twenty percent (20 %) match of this amount is $282,395. The local match
will be covered primarily through potential right -of -way donations with an estimated value of
$218,171 in addition to $32,500 in Roanoke County In -Kind Services. The remaining
matching funds needed are $31,724. Roanoke County intends to request $850,710 in
Transportation Alternatives funds for fiscal year 2014.
For the Transportation Alternatives Program Application to be eligible for submission, the
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors must hold a public hearing and adopt a resolution
supporting the project. The Roanoke Valley Alleghany Metropolitan Planning Organization
endorsed this project on September 22, 2011.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The total project cost for Phase 2 is approximately $2,449,946. $1,316,841 in
VDOT /Roanoke County Revenue Sharing funds reduces the project cost to $1,133,105.
Page 2 of 3
The twenty percent (20 %) required local match of $282,395 will be funded through potential
right -of -way donations ($218,171,) Roanoke County In -Kind Services ($32,500) and the
remaining $31,724 possibly through an account related to the Commercial Corridor
Matching Program established to fund County corridor improvements. The Phase 2
Transportation Alternatives Program request will be $850,710.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Adopt the attached resolution requesting the Commonwealth Transportation Board
fund an Alternatives Program Project for Plantation Road in Roanoke County,
Virginia.
2. Take no action at this time.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative #1.
Page 3of3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 22, 2013
RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTA-
TION BOARD FUND A TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROJECT
FOR PLANTATION ROAD IN ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Commonwealth Transportation Board
construction allocation procedures, it is necessary that a request by resolution be
received from the local government or state agency in order that the Virginia
Department of Transportation accept a Transportation Alternatives Project in Roanoke
County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors requests the
Commonwealth Transportation Board continue to fund a project for the improvement of
Plantation Road in the form of pedestrian and bicycle accommodations as well as
streetscape improvements.
2. That the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors hereby agrees to provide
a minimum twenty percent (20 %) of the total cost for planning and design, right of way
and construction of this project.
3. That the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors hereby agrees to enter
into an agreement with the Virginia Department of Transportation to provide oversight
that ensures the project is developed in accordance with all state and federal
Page 1 of 2
requirements for design, right of way acquisition, and construction of a federally funded
transportation project.
4. That the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will be responsible for
maintenance, upkeep and operating costs of any facility constructed with Alternatives
Program funds.
5. That if the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors subsequently elects to
cancel this project the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors hereby agrees to
reimburse the Virginia Department of Transportation for the total amount of costs
expended by the Department through the date the Department is notified of such
cancellation. The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors also agrees to repay any
funds previously reimbursed that are later deemed ineligible by the Federal Highway
Administration.
Page of
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. 0-2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
January 22, 2013
Public Hearing and Request for Resolution of Support to apply
for fiscal year 2013 -2014 Virginia Department of Transportation
(VDOT) Transportation Alternatives Program funding for the
Eastern Section of the Roanoke River Greenway- Roanoke City
to Blue Ridge Parkway, Vinton Magisterial District
Doug Blount
Director of Parks, Recreation and Tourism
Lindsay Blankenship
Greenway Planner
B. Clayton Goodman III
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Roanoke River Greenway will be a thirty -one (31) -mile bicycle /pedestrian trail through
the entire Roanoke Valley, linking Roanoke County, the Cities of Roanoke and Salem, and
the Town of Vinton. The greenway system has been strongly supported by citizens,
businesses, civic organizations, and local governments. As such, the Roanoke Valley
Greenway Commission made the Roanoke River Greenway its number one priority in the
2007 Update to the Roanoke Valley Conceptual Greenway Plan. Greenways were also
strongly supported by Roanoke County citizens during development of the Department of
Parks, Recreation and Tourism Comprehensive Parks Master Plan, completed in 2007. The
residents of Roanoke County identified greenways as a "High Priority Need" for facilities
and amenities desired in our community.
The City of Roanoke has completed their section of the Roanoke River Greenway to the
wastewater treatment plant. A bridge associated with this project provides connectivity of
the Roanoke River and Tinker Creek Greenways. Roanoke County entered into a contract
Page 1 of 4
with Anderson &Associates of Virginia, Inc. (A &A) in April 2012 to provide professional
engineering services for the preliminary engineering of the Eastern Section of the Roanoke
River Greenway from the wastewater treatment plant to the Blue Ridge Parkway. The
project area includes land located on the south side of the Roanoke River. The greenway is
estimated to be two point seven (2.7) miles in length.
A &A and County staff members have made considerable progress to date on the initial
stages of the preliminary design process, including meeting with all affected property
owners, field reconnaissance and surveying, and conceptual design of portions of the
greenway corridor. There are eleven (11) private property owners along the south side of
the Roanoke River, as well as land owned by the Western Virginia Water Authority,
Appalachian Power Company, the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority, and the
National Park Service /Department of the Interior. Property owners are generally supportive
of the Roanoke River Greenway and provided Roanoke County with permission to conduct
surveying, engineering, and geotechnical analysis on their parcels. Issues and concerns
indicated by property owners included the following: hunting, fishing, access to the river,
security, safety, lighting, and hours of operation.
The project team continues working with the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT)
and the National Park Service /Blue Ridge Parkway concerning the location of a possible
eastern terminus (i.e., trailhead parking area). In August 2011, the draft Environmental
Assessment for the Roanoke Valley /Blue Ridge Parkway Trail Plan was released by the
National Park Service (NPS). The NPS preferred Alternative C includes a connection for
the Roanoke River Greenway to the Blue Ridge Parkway. Roanoke County is currently
involved in discussions with staff from the Blue Ridge Parkway to develop a Memorandum
of Agreement/Partnership Agreement for the greenway to cross federal land. To date, the
NPS has not been supportive of an at -grade greenway crossing of the Parkway motor road,
nor the location of a trailhead on NPS property. A &A has submitted a proposal to VDOT for
a greenway accommodation along Highland Road.
The County received funding through the VDOT Transportation Enhancement Program in
2008 2009 2011 and 2012 for the Eastern Section of the Roanoke River Greenway. The
County currently has $716,250 committed to this project (a combination of VDOT funds and
County match); however, additional funds are needed to cover the costs associated with
the project design, engineering, permitting, private land acquisition, and construction. A
summary of the VDOT Enhancement funding allocated for this project is provided below.
Under the recently enacted MAP -21 federal transportation bill, the Transportation
Enhancement Program (EN) is now part of the Transportation Alternatives (TA) Program.
MAP -21 includes many program changes - two being that a portion of TA funds shall be
allocated based on population and that MPOs in Transportation Management Areas
Page 2 of 4
08 -09
09 -10
10 -11
11 -12
12 -13
TOTALS
Amount Requested
$ 372,480
$ 276,800
$ 623,700
$ 472,435
$ 302,420
$2,047,835
Amount Received (80% of total project costs)
$ 104,000
$ 80,000
$ -
$ 237,000
$ 152,000
$ 573
County Match (20% of total projects costs)
$ 26,000
$ 20,000
$ 59
$ 38,000
$ 143,250
Under the recently enacted MAP -21 federal transportation bill, the Transportation
Enhancement Program (EN) is now part of the Transportation Alternatives (TA) Program.
MAP -21 includes many program changes - two being that a portion of TA funds shall be
allocated based on population and that MPOs in Transportation Management Areas
Page 2 of 4
(TMAs), which are urbanized areas with a population over 200,000, shall select projects to
be carried out within the TMAs. This year, VDOT is accepting applications for existing
projects that have received Enhancement Program allocations in past years. Staff would
like to apply for additional funding to complete Phase I (design, engineering, permitting, and
right -of -way acquisition) and Phase II A (construction from Roanoke City line to the Harner
property). The grant application is due February 1, 2013.
FISCAL IMPACT:
In accordance with the Transportation Enhancement Program, the federal share of the
funding is eighty percent (80 %), requiring a match of twenty percent (20 %) from State
funds. VDOT's Enhancement Program Policy requires the matching share of state funds to
come from the sponsoring locality. This can be in the form of local cash, private
contributions, donation of goods and services, and /or land value.
Staff recommends applying for approximately $868,518 in grant funding which will require
a local match of $217,129. It is anticipated that the match amount will be partially fulfilled
with the value of donated right of way; therefore, reducing the fiscal impact to Roanoke
County.
Summary of Project Costs and Phasin
Phase I - Preliminary Design, Engineering, Right-of-Way
$1,112,717
Phase 11 A - Construction from Roanoke City line to
Harner Propert
$689
Phase 11 B - Construction from Harner Property to
Niagara Dam
$3
Phase 11 C - Construction from Niagara Dam to Park wa
$1
Total Project Cost Estimate:
$6
Fiscal Year 2013 -2014 Funding Request
Phase I - Preliminary Engineering, Right-of-Way
$1
Phase II A - Construction from Roanoke City line to
Harner Property
$ 689
Previous Awards
$ 573,000
County Match to Previous Awards
$(143
Funding Needed
$1,085,647
Federal Funding Request 80%
$868,518
Local Match 20%
$217,129
ALTERNATIVES:
1) Approve resolution of support to allow staff to submit a fiscal year 2013 -2014
Transportation Alternatives Program application in an amount not to exceed
$868,518, which will require a local match of $217,129 for the Eastern Section of the
Page 3 of 4
Roanoke River Greenway proposed between the City of Roanoke and the Blue
Ridge Parkway.
2) Do not approve resolution of support to allow staff to submit a fiscal year 2013 -2014
Transportation Alternatives Program application in an amount not to exceed
$868,518 which will require a local match of $217,129 for the Eastern Section of the
Roanoke River Greenway proposed between the City of Roanoke and the Blue
Ridge Parkway.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative One.
ATTACHMENTS
1. 2007 Roanoke Valley Conceptual Greenway Map
2. Conceptual Map of the "Proposed Eastern Section of Roanoke River Greenway ",
prepared by Anderson and Associates, Inc.
Page of
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 22, 2013
RESOLUTION APPROVING A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE FY 2013-
2014 TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OF THE EASTERN SECTION OF THE ROANOKE
RIVER GREENWAY BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROANOKE AND THE
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the federal Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 Century Act (MAP-
21) provides for a statewide Transportation Alternatives Program, using federal
transportation funds and state or local matching funds; and
WHEREAS, from funds appropriated to the Transportation Alternatives Program
the Commonwealth Transportation Board shall approve the selection of projects on an
annual basis and in accordance with §33.1 -12(5) of the Code of Virginia and MAP -21;
and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Commonwealth Transportation Board
construction allocation procedures, it is necessary that a request by resolution be
received from the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County in order that the Virginia
Department of Transportation establish a Transportation Alternatives project in Roanoke
County; and
WHEREAS, the 2007 update to the Roanoke Valley Conceptual Greenway Plan,
adopted by Roanoke County, recommends that the Roanoke River Greenway be
completed in the next five years.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, as follows:
Page 1 of 2
1. That the Commonwealth Transportation Board approve a project for the
development and construction of approximately two point seven (2.7) miles of the
Eastern Section of the Roanoke River Greenway between the City of Roanoke and the
Blue Ridge Parkway.
2. That the total project costs associated with Phases I and IIA of the project
(which will address project design, engineering and permitting, private land acquisition,
and construction along the proposed greenway corridor) are estimated to be
$1,085,647. Roanoke County requests grant funding in the amount of $868,518, which
is eighty percent (80 %) of the total unfunded cost of Phases I and IIA of this project.
Roanoke County agrees to pay matching funds of $217,129, which is twenty percent
(20 %) of the total unfunded cost of Phases I and IIA of this project.
3. That if Roanoke County subsequently elects to cancel this project the County
agrees to reimburse the Virginia Department of Transportation for the total amount of
costs expended by the Department through the date the Department is notified of such
cancellation.
4. That Roanoke County will be responsible for maintenance, upkeep and
operating costs of any facility constructed with Transportation Alternatives Program
funds.
Page 2 of 2
_
(n a)
c
/
�
0- CD
o
t
/11 V
° E
CC
> G a) •� LL Z
z _
•
�
�
N
L L Q �'
C (6 L --� a) a)
O O O O Q .N .D) � Q
0
C
r
LO
) G
U
'
o
-
=
3 1eP�a old
o
F
U
�
i
Y
LL
F
o .( N
�
, Mme
CD
�� `fir � �• �
• i''•��;� � ��
.
•`•.` •��� EW
l N
Q C �'
v
y Va11eY
1
R•.l _
(a
L
y _
x
CD
C
cv
0
S
p
L)
d \\
777
ca
m\
o
♦
A m
-
_
q j
`
F,
o o .
♦ N � e N o � � co J
3 �k
� c
�a
U
a�
c
0
y
i l
a `
L
0
�
V
O
V
W
I
O
O
rte\ I^
i ( N
c L _
cu cn
m M O
U) cn
c _ N
cu Q � a
L � aS w
Y H E
(a cA o �. - 0 a) i �, �, cn ca a) ca ca C > U "
O> Z >., . � a) O •� (� O O O O O - Q) c CL) cC� .� 0 - m o °° c�� �— L / L �' ► O a�C�(� CD m m
CD O FU 3: O L L L L m V O
CU �c ,c r L� '► L rn r�'► �c a) o C ca 0 (� C� a L C L L � o Q
C Q) V (� V (+3 L Y • - ._ O L Y LD
(a C O 1 L
H a) � cuLL�� , mc�5 _���YC.ca���ca� > ��cC�
U° o >� L) d) z�0o0m ��Lc�����Y
M 0 �. O O a) O C7 o a U O L = > C U U '` '` C) N O a) a) O L a) a
LLJ CU -0 co a) a) cL o= a� ° N ��c �. °��c�c=U o
(� U M W L� N�/ - ` L a) m a) O •� L n/ C C O C O O G O O
a) LL C C v O a) O7 O O LL O O C G L E L C C N
U L a (6 L Q (6 N (6 c3 (6 (6 U O M M - - a) O a) O O O
c� c� c�0w :j —i U) P
Q m m m m m U U U i. i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i
i i i i i i i i i O�NM�LI �G�I `oOd�OrNM�L4�G�l`oOd�O�NM�LI�
IL N M 4 6 6 f� a0 O 1 � 1 1 1 1 -- N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M
(n a)
/
Z
0- CD
CU 3:
L N U
° ~
t
/11 V
° E
CC
> G a) •� LL Z
J
.�"
N CO N U J
O - O (6 C C U U
V
L L Q �'
C (6 L --� a) a)
O O O O Q .N .D) � Q
0 aaaQwwwC�a
rte\ I^
i ( N
c L _
cu cn
m M O
U) cn
c _ N
cu Q � a
L � aS w
Y H E
(a cA o �. - 0 a) i �, �, cn ca a) ca ca C > U "
O> Z >., . � a) O •� (� O O O O O - Q) c CL) cC� .� 0 - m o °° c�� �— L / L �' ► O a�C�(� CD m m
CD O FU 3: O L L L L m V O
CU �c ,c r L� '► L rn r�'► �c a) o C ca 0 (� C� a L C L L � o Q
C Q) V (� V (+3 L Y • - ._ O L Y LD
(a C O 1 L
H a) � cuLL�� , mc�5 _���YC.ca���ca� > ��cC�
U° o >� L) d) z�0o0m ��Lc�����Y
M 0 �. O O a) O C7 o a U O L = > C U U '` '` C) N O a) a) O L a) a
LLJ CU -0 co a) a) cL o= a� ° N ��c �. °��c�c=U o
(� U M W L� N�/ - ` L a) m a) O •� L n/ C C O C O O G O O
a) LL C C v O a) O7 O O LL O O C G L E L C C N
U L a (6 L Q (6 N (6 c3 (6 (6 U O M M - - a) O a) O O O
c� c� c�0w :j —i U) P
Q m m m m m U U U i. i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i
i i i i i i i i i O�NM�LI �G�I `oOd�OrNM�L4�G�l`oOd�O�NM�LI�
IL N M 4 6 6 f� a0 O 1 � 1 1 1 1 -- N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M
N
U
re
O
0
L p�
� Q
O p
M o
O
b
0
C1
o 0
°
O o
ad
0
a
0
0
° b
❑ J
0 4�
fl
00
o Qsa °o
o �
0 0
°
P w 0
� O
OQ
O
O
O
O 000 0 0 ° o °Op
woo
QZRe
Q�
z
O �
coo � Q ❑Q❑
°d❑ o
❑a❑ 0
°o °4 �C14 ❑dod C
°
❑
d dt5 o6Q D� ❑
4
o ❑❑ ❑0 0
C3 C3 p Q ° Q CD C]
O Q
� 0
>o
Q
z
w
w
��
V
ry
Z
`
w
O
w
a
O
� � a
Z
a
p
Q ❑
O
° o
Q �,
0 ° a
O ❑
O Q
LL
°
O
Z
D I7 ❑
❑
L
4 o
°
� ° ° pO
Oo
U
w
U)
Z
mz LL
NOS
LU
w
U)
z
O
Q
C)
w
o
� w
V )
O�
O
o
�
0 0
N
U
re
O
0
L p�
� Q
O p
M o
O
b
0
C1
o 0
°
O o
ad
0
a
0
0
° b
❑ J
0 4�
fl
00
o Qsa °o
o �
0 0
°
P w 0
NUJ
OQ
0
woo
QZRe
Q�
z
av!,
�w
zCD
�a
0
D
O
0
0
O
W
LLJ
LL-
o O p 0 z
LLJ
�ol o u
O
v v
o� Qo 0
cn LU
O o
w Q� oo OQ o 0 0
0 9 ,
� o
a O O O O O 8 O
N O
❑ O a° od �'
o
0 0
0 0
o °
a
0
°o 0
U
U)
Z
'-'�
o a
U
a
Q
QQa
p Q 6
C)
0 0 �
c
P -1
PETITIONER: Philip Argabright
CASE NUMBER: 01- 01/2013
Board of Supervisors Consent 1 St Reading Date: December 11, 2012
Planning Commission Hearing Date: January 7, 2013
Board of Supervisors Hearing & 2 nd Reading Date: January 22, 2013
A. REQUEST
To rezone 12.9 acres spanning three separate parcels from Low Density
Residential District (R -1) to Agricultural /Rural Preserve District (AG -3)
located at 5032 Stanley Farm Road in order to allow agriculture on his
property. Specifically the applicant has indicated that he would like to have
a small number of cows, chickens, and sheep for his private family use.
B. CITIZEN COMMENTS
No citizens spoke at the hearing.
C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Tara Pattisall presented the staff report. The petitioner was present to
answer questions. No questions were asked by the Commissioners.
D. COMMISSION ACTION
Ms. Hooker made a motion to recommend approval of the petition. The
motion passed 5 -0.
E. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
None.
F. ATTACHMENTS: X Concept Plan X Vicinity Map
X Staff Report X Other
Philip Thompson, Secretary
Roanoke County Planning Commission
STAFF REPORT
Petitioner: Philip Argabright
Request: To rezone 12.9 acres from R -1 to AG -3
Location: 5032 Stanley Farm Road
Magisterial District: Catawba
Proffered Conditions: None
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Philip Argabright is requesting a rezoning from Low Density Residential District (R -1) to Agricultural /Rural Preserve
District (AG -3) located at 5032 Stanley Farm Road in order to allow agriculture on 12.9 acres spanning three
separate parcels. Specifically the applicant has indicated that he would like to have a small number of cows,
chickens, and sheep for his private family use.
The 2005 Comprehensive Plan indicates that the Future Land Use Designation of these parcels is Rural Preserve.
Rural Preserve is a future land use area of mostly undeveloped, outlying lands. These rural regions are generally
stable and require a high degree of protection to preserve agricultural, forestall, recreational, and remote rural
residential areas.
1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
Agriculture is defined in the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as being the use of land for the production
of food and fibre, including farming, dairying, pasturage, horticulture, viticulture, and animal and poultry
husbandry. A garden accessory to a residence shall not be considered agriculture.
Agriculture is allowed by -right with no additional standards in the AG -3 District.
2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
Background — At present, there is a 1.5 -story single family dwelling constructed in 1980 on the 4.0 acre
parcel. The other two parcels are vacant. There is an existing barn and fencing on the 4.0 acre parcel,
however no animals are currently on site. This house is at the termination of Stanley Farm Road.
Topography /Vegetation — The property increases in elevation from up the side of Fort Lewis Mountain.
There is little flat land available on the site. The property is heavily wooded and cannot be seen from
Stanley Farm Road where the private driveway to the house begins.
Surrounding Neighborhood —The subject parcels are surrounded on three sides by an undeveloped 2247
acre preserve zoned AG -3. The remaining border is with another large R -1 parcel. It should be noted that
several nearby properties that are presently zoned R -1 have agricultural uses that have been in place since
before the comprehensive rezoning in 1992.
3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Site Layout /Architecture — There are multiple existing fenced areas on site for the future pasturing of
animals.
Access /Traffic Circulation —VDOT had no comments on the petition.
4.
5.
Screening & Buffering The property is heavily wooded on all sides.
CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The 2005 Comprehensive Plan indicates that the Future Land Use Designation of these parcels is Rural
Preserve. Rural Village is a future land use area of mostly undeveloped, outlying lands. These rural regions
are generally stable and require a high degree of protection to preserve agricultural, forestall, recreational,
and remote rural residential areas.
STAFF CONCLUSIONS
Philip Argabright is requesting a rezoning from Low Density Residential District (R -1) to
Agricultural /Preserve District (AG -3) located at 5032 Stanley Farm Road in order to allow agriculture on
three parcels totaling 12.9 acres. The properties in question were zoned A -1 prior to the countywide
comprehensive rezoning in 1992. In the period since, no large -scale residential development has occurred
and the area has maintained its rural, agricultural character.
The proposed project is in conformance with the goals and objectives of the Rural Preserve Designation.
Additionally, some of the neighboring properties already have grandfathered agricultural uses in place
similar to what Mr. Argabright is requesting. The abundant existing vegetation that the petitioners intends to
retain, generally serves to protect surrounding property owners from any potential impact associated with
this request.
CASE NUMBER: 1- 1/2013
PREPARED BY: Tara Pattisall
HEARING DATES: PC: 1/7/13 BOS: 1/22/13
ATTACHMENTS: Application Materials
Aerial Photograph
Zoning Map
Future Land Use Map
Site Inspection Photographs
AG -3 Zoning District Regulations
R -1 Zoning District Regulations
0,
CCunt v of Roanokc
COMM unit Deve-lop me, lit
r
Plannin .unm
�104 Hernard Dyive
P 0 Box 298,00
RoanokQ, VA 24018-0799
10 772--02068 1-AX ( 540 ) -776-7155
F.4LLA11'PLX",,4A1TS
11 cc Ic type 0 f ap 1) IL I C al ion Fillud (deck all thm Appl
X Re.--zm pin I I S pt: c ia I Llse Ll Va. ri a n cc I I NV m i v er AdMilliSlJ"Alkee A
Appllica Ott - ijamw:,iddress lv/zlip
Ownv,r'.q nainciaddress wiz`
Propeft Lo c Lat i o i i
J - 0 112 -5
2 D'C L
For Llil�ffl"Use OnIV
Dato ro-vowd,
A3 1,:AO oo fvk' I't Its -A da I
(0 2
1 -1 1 Ll -L'. i-w ds I ki 13 el 1. 11 v
mmmmum=11111 dMMA
I-111011C.-
W0111
Cc I I 'IT
l.ax No.:
Woyk:
Fax N o. 8:
ma Dist ict:
11 C U M P P'll 3 91, 115. -? Rev i ow
A16 �2 r2
(110MMUllit plalltllill ax-CA:
Size ofpamel(s): A
9 / 7 C *'� mc� 5 1"Xi Ina 1-,�md Use,: �.
Rr,f ZDATOW., SPE'CL-1 L USE PEIM117', H-; ( I F-,LR AAD COMP P Is.2.,22.32) R E P1 I-, ri 1 PPL ICA MM (IUS) W CP
T-
Proposed Z01141
Propiosed Lauid L I sic, e �-e :2.�le -/�kj rve- f Aw
DOCS 111C P al-CC[ 111QCI I 11C Ill i 11fill UtIn 101 Al a Width, and g e lv I rem-ents
- v . Fromm aftho re distrid?
Y C s N 0 IF NO A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST,
Dou-i !hc P arcel 111col 11-11� mililmuir., criteria ft][. lrlj� 4re 1J8v,'1,' Yes No
CE IS [j]
IF NO, A VARWN 4 ) Irl r RS1
I f rolmn in r are condit ions bein proffere with this re Yes No
.V 7 f rj 171
J -VCL TVA f111,;R A M) , A] -,4L 4PPLICAW) /I /,A /1
Va r i a i , til - i2i I- ti I'S ect I on ( s )
c) l' l h c R(xmokic L k%iviu, Zwniivi
OrdinaIli
Appeal W'Zoill"I" Adminisiratol-'s docisicil w
Appea[ of 1n1-kA-pvc1<jti-ci1 of S-ection :_ o i I ic Roanoke Cou M Z on in 0 rd i I ja 01 C 1:�
A pp �a I of bite rpret at] on of Z an i ii M C-i - to -It-
Ai011 L701IL INQ'IS a �
Is APP LICATION WILL NOTHE AC"CI-111"I'l. n
ARE M IS I NG 011 INCOLM PL I A F..
4 1 .� 2 X, I I coacept - App I icn i k) i', ill law
Appficalion Nk i es --mind bo u Ild S descl. i l it i un
Ad -novs
Ju.stification J L 81 -.%-u we uppli ca tio n I
properi� om
IA Ivb 'L--L:q-jJ 1� I 11al I am Ofthel- thu nwiler 01 pl-opcily or 111C Ownur%', u ru or :i trac I [ eke 1-c h ;I-s u i1nd --uln 4w i ri Nv i tl 1 the k I 1111 V IL: LI MI d cull se 111
r
r I I Lr- I �41% r Lj.
■
)Ivncr S i
Lt_OF JOOIF vm
0)
JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2 -2232) REVIEW
REQUESTS
Applicant /-12,
The Planning Cot 77iT]1ssloi7 wi ll stG� dy •ezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-22 revieNv requests to
determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the
following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary.
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the
beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance.
ems'
LTd�'
Please explain flow the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke Count Comnlunit
County y
Plan.
- ...
/ &e .�
V06�1 4 .g F p _
7�4 lilz
IV4 1-0;?
Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as
the impacts on public services and facilities, including water /sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue.
3
CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST
A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the
land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or
design issues arising fi the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future
use and development of the property and by so doing, cor - rect any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting
regulations.
The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require
changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or unposed on a special
use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations.
A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2 -2232) review and variance
applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional. site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature
of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the
followincy are considered minimum:
ALL.APPLICANTS
�� a. Applicant name and name of development
b. Date, scale and north arrow
Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions
. t ad. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties
e . Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc.
The zoning and land use of all adjacent ro erties
P p
g. All property lines and easements
�h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights
b
i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development
j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces
Additiwicil ii7foi-matioi7 t•equh -ecl fot• REZONING w7d SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS
v"" k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site
1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers
m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals
n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections
o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants
p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed
q. If project is to be hased, lease show phase schedule
P p p
I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete.
Signature of applicant
Date
i
Community Development c_ � Planning & Zoning Division
a q
T:r
POTENTIAL OF DEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND /OR '_FRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
The following is a list of potentially high traffic - generating land uses and road network situations
that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to y our
rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request
involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a county planner,
the county traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the
potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in
order to expedite your application process.
(Note this list is Trot inclusive acrd the County staff and VDOTreserve the right to request a trafrtc
study at any time as deemed necessary.)
High Traffic - Generating Land Uses:
0 Single- family residential subdivisions, Multi - family residential units, or Apartments with more
than 75 dwelling units
a Restaurant (with or without dr windows)
® Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash
0 Retail shop/Shopping center
® offices ( including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.)
® Regional public facilities
® Educational/Recr facilities
® Religious assemblies
a Hotel /Motel
® Golf course
0 Hospital/Nursing home/Cl
0 Industrial site/Factory
0 Day care center
r Bank
® Non- specific use requests
Road Network Situations:
® D evelopment adjacent to/with access onto/ 500 -ft of intersection of a roadway classified
as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 400, 111400, 220 221 419, etc)
® For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more
than two (2) years old a nd/or roadway conditions have changed significantly
® When required to evaluate access issues
0 D evelopment with ingre on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening,
improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six --Yr Road Plan, etc,)
0 D evelopment in an area where there is a known existing traffic a nd/or safety problem
a D evelopment would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s)
0 Substantial departure from the community Plan
0 Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred ( 100) trips during the peak hour of the
traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750)
trips in an average day
Effective date: April 19, 2005
7
R
Community Development Planning &zoning Division
1838
NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET
WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION
PLANNING COMMISSION APPLI CATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE
The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision waiver,
Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public
hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled p ublic
hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agenc y to
adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information p rior
to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This
continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional
information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by
planning staff to the Planning Comrission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to
determine if a continuance may be warranted.
POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND /OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver,
Public Street waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia
Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and /or a traffic impact study that would be
beneficial in making a land use decision (//Tote: a list of potential land uses and situations that ii)ould
necessitate
Arther study is proWded as part of this application packag(').
This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic
analyses and /or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and /or suggestions to the planning staff
and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance
and the newly scheduled public hearing date.
Effective date; April 19, 2005
ame of Petition
__
Petitioner's natur
Date
8
no 7 PPcE10!
THIS DEED, made and entered into this 4th day of
March, 1981, by and between VIRGINIA MAE PATTERSON, Widow, party
of the first part, and PHILIP M. ARGABRIGHT, SR. and BRENDA G.
ARGABRIGHT, husband and wife, as tenants by the entireties with
right of survivorship as at common law, parties of the second
part.
W I T N E S S E T H:
PH[LL6PS & DOHERTY
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
I I I EAST CLAY ST.
SALEM, VIRGINIA
THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of TEN
DOLLARS ($10.00), cash in hand paid by the parties of the second
unto the party of the first part, and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the
party of the first part does hereby BARGAIN, SELL, GRANT and
CONVEY with covenants of General Warranty of Title and Modern
English Covenants, unto PHILIP M. ARGABRIGHT, SR. and BRENDA G.
ARGABRIGHT, husband and wife, as tenants by the entireties with
right of survivorship as at common law, all that certain tract
or parcel of land lying and being in the County of Roanoke,
Virginia, and more particularly described as follows, to- -wit:
COMMENCING at the southeast corner of that certain
4 acre tract as shown on plat by T. P. Parker &
Son, Engineers & Surveyors, dated October 17, 1978,
a copy of which plat is attached to Deed recorded
in Deed Book 1109, at page 454 in the Clerk's
Office of the Circuit Court for the County of
Roanoke; thence S. 41° 08' E. 100 feet to a point;
thence S. 32° 16' W. 400 feet to a point; thence
N. 41° 08' W. 100 feet to the southwest corner
of the above-described 4 acre tract of land;
thence N. 32° 16' E. 400 feet to the place of
beginning, and containing approximately .9 acres
of land more or less; and
BEING a part of the same property conveyed to
Virginia Mae Patterson by Deed of record. in
Deed Book 343 at page 449, and of record in the
Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the
County of Roanoke, Virginia.
And the party of the first part does further grant
and convey unto the parties of the second part, their heirs and
HOK _ ?A .
assigns, an easement for ingress and egress from the easterly
line over the remaining property of Virginia Mae Patterson as
shown on the hereinabove- described plat and along those lines
and distances as shown on the hereinabove- described plat to
the Kilby property line shown on the hereinabove - described plat.
It is understood that there exists an additional twenty (20)
foot easement over the Kilby land to Virginia Secondary Route
807.
This Deed is made subject to all easements, restric-
tions and reservations of record affecting title to the same.
WITNESS the following signature and seal:
__ �) (SEAL)
VI INIA MAE PATTER SON, WIDOW
STATE OF VIRGINIA
CITY /EOTTY OF to-wit:
a Notary Public
y
of and for the jurisdiction aforesaid, do hereby certify that
Virginia Mae Patterson, Widow, whose name is signed to the
foregoing Deed bearing date of March 4, 1981, has this day
personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my
aforesaid jurisdiction.
GIVEN under my hand this day of 1981.
o Notary Public
My Commission expires:
PHILLIPS 8C DOHERTY
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
111 EAST CLAY ST.
SALEM, VIRGINIA
� ' ov
. 1_ 10 3
December 19, 1980
Mr. Phillip Argabrinht's request to add a .9 acre parcel to his
existing 4.00 acre tract (Tax P1ap 30, Parcel 113) noes not violate
either the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoninq or Subdivision
Ordinance.
1
Timothy 1.4. rubala
County Planner /Subdivision Agent
State Tax _ !IS In the Clerk Off of the Circuit Court for tine County of Roanoke, ��. tF� '
c ; #Y 'a �_ �w. S /6 clay Of__ 19 of / this in sidrument was presented, arid'
1M isf rw / ' T with _he Cerflficate of acknoMedgment therc':o arm.exed, admitted to record at
o4mes r - �D a The taxes irnposed by par. 58- 54. avid 58 -54.1
`a of the .code have been paid.
9Y u"n, Den_ Ck -r�
P 6 00 843 Mailed Philip M. Argabright
Route 7, Box 100
Salem, Va. 24153
Im
THIS DEED, made and entered into this 25th day of
May, 1983, by and between VIRGINIA MAE PATTERSON, widow, party of
the first p art ; and PHILIP M. ARGABRIGHT and BRENDA G. ARGABRIGHT,
husband and wife, as tenants by the entirety with the right of
(survivorship, parties of the second part.
: W I T N E S S E T H:
THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of TEN
DOLLARS ($10.00) cash in hand paid to the party of the first part
by the parties of the second part, receipt whereof is hereby
acknowledged, and other good and valuable consideration, the party
of the first part does hereby BARGAIN, SET,L, GRANT and CONVEY with
Covenants of General Warranty of Title and Modern English Covenants
unto PHILIP M. ARGABRIGHT and BRENDA G. ARGABRIGHT, husband and
wife, as tenants by the entirety with the right of survivorship as
at common law and as permitted by Section 55-21 of the Code of
Virginia as amended to date, all that certain tract or parcel of I
(land situate in the County of Roanoke, Virginia and more particular;
described as follows, to -wit:
Commencing at the northeast corner of that
certain 0.88 acre, property of Philip M.
Argabright, as shown in the Roanoke County
Circuit Court Clerk's Office in Deed Book
1177, page 101; thence N. 41° 08' 00" W.
100 feet to a point; thence N. 41° 08' 00"
W. 454.40 feet to a point; thence N. 33
50' 30" E. 195.79 feet to a point; thence
N. 75 57' 03" E. 55.81 feet to a point;
thence S. 41° 08' 00" E. 508.56 feet to
a point; thence S. 32 16' 00" W. 249.17
feet to the point of BEGINNING and con-
taining 3.00 acres, all of which i -s shown
on plat made by T. P. Parker & Son, Engi-
neers & Surveyors, dated May 4, 1983, a
copy of which is attached hereto and made
a part of this deed; and
PHILLIPS, DOHERT`f I
SWANSON
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
I ] E EAST CLAY ST.
SALEM, VIRGINIA
Ly
� I K 11 P 6 00 84
PHIL LIPS, DOHERTY
SWANSON
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
111 EASE' CLAY ST.
SALEM, VIRGINIA
BEING a part of the same property conveyed
to Virginia Mae Patterson, which said pro-
perty is of record in the Roanoke County
Circuit Court Clerk's Office in Deed Book
343, page 449.
This deed is made subject to all easements, restric-
tions and reservations of record affecting title to same.
WITNESS the following signat and seal.
(SEA
V RG -; A MAE PATTER.SON
STATE OF VIRGINIA
AT LARGE, to -wit:
The foregoing deed dated May 26, 1983 was acknowl-
edged before me thi day of 1983 by Virginia Mae
Patterson.
My commission expires: 1,2
Notary Public_
"tate T $ 7� � in the Clerk's Off' e of he Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Va. this
to record a
County Tax $ "A day of .. _l9 this ins ' rumei - It wzs presented, and
Cransfer i=e.e� ith t! �erti e fe f nowiedgment thcr�;�o �ar,ne�.eca, a� r ittec�
Cierk's fee i � ' o'c9ackM; The taxes imposed by par 58 - 54 and 58.54.E
y
fiats of fl re code have been paid. Clerk
120 & 220A $ 0 � Test -� N
BY
��' $ - p C9 S 1 7 F
OQ All
GL -
Q O a q
� ` o
00 @ C9 �!
ul
®� �
Q7
Q RT - 793 7
I O
l�TE S28
... s
RTE E.
u1 In
Q I1.ITLRSTG - f� a
cr
t N�� v 5.
O J �P �.
�C� 0 VI 0- I Q 1T M AP
113 a S Cd L. E
s ®O
. tioTE "
- T t S PRO P 7-- `r' !
SOT Vj I T 1-4 1 U dQY
-Z ¢ C, • i_ /S, . SPEC- A L F LOO D
lk-
�0 0 RT`z Ll�
PATTERSOQ
D.B. 343 PG 449
�cp
l
p,LTH OF
j
G - C� q �� O '
< 4 -\ CD 44 E �'r
�7 O \O k 8 C) JOHN T. PARKER
2 t
O0, .95 E U LAND SURVEYOR
-
¢ 0 ® Q' 1 1 -- CERTIFICATE NO.
� o �� > v � � � 1076
,�. (P ,�� � x 1ST I
Q p- � O 20' Rl W ` �f�D SUS`
- LAND
i
o .® S5 43'34 ' E
Q ®. Co4.13` E
S 2 5° 53' 1 Q" E
® 'Ro APPROVED: l 91.38'
O � i u
�� S�CRET4RY R /��JOK! = CODUTY [
E
(� � P L A }.s }..] 11J G C O M ►�I 1 SS � O !.1 � Ss
�C c)
C,
.� SURVEY FOR
Q M ARGABRIG�-4T +�
° 9 S� law 1 G 3 . QQ +
Co�v EYES B� v � QG1 u �� ��B PATT�RSou
CAT41rvB.4 M D1STRlCT Q ¢°� � �
R0A , -lQKE CC)UQTY W. O. tt G215 0�
a
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS
VIRGINIA
FLAT OF SUR EY�S CO REC �� T. P. P AR K ER ®� SCALE I -- 1Oo'
/ / 9 I
ENGINEERS & I,a SURVEYORS DATE,
ER rIFrED LAND SURVEYOR SALEM VIRGIN N- W_y�
Del. Pat Whitescarver Jr., Atty.
2 8PP, 0 072 7
THIS DEED, made this 21st day of August, 1986, by and
between ROGER O. PATTERSON and MICHELLE PATTERSON, husband and
wife, parties of the first part, and PHILIP M. ARGABRIGHT and
BRENDA G. ARGABRIGHT, husband and wife as tenants by the entirety
parties of the second part,
: W I T N E S S E T H
THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of TEN
DOLLARS ($10.00), cash in hand, paid by the parties of the second
part hereto unto the parties of the first part hereto, and other
good and valuable considerations, the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties of the first part hereto do hereby
bargain, sell, grant and convey with General Warranty and Modern
English Covenants of Title unto PHILIP M. ARGABRIGHT and BRENDA
G. ARGABRIGHT,'husband and wife as tenants by the entirety, with
right of survivorship at at common law, all that certain lot or
parcel of land, situate in the County of Roanoke,. Virginia,
together with improvements thereon and appurtenances thereunto
belonging, and more particularly described as follows, to -wit:
BEGINNING at a pin set on the southerly
line of a 20 -foot road right of .way said point
being common corner to the parties of the
first part and the parties of the second
part; thence, along and with the line of
the property of the parties of the second
part, leaving said 20 -foot road right of - way
N. 31 41' 06" E. 373.33 feet to an old pin
thence N. 41 45' 42" W. 512.87 feet to an
old pin on the line of the property of
Owens - Illinois; thence, with the line of
Owens- Illinois, N. 75 33' 10" E. 273.27
feet to an old pin; thence, N. 57 52' 38"
E. 454.86 feet to a pin set, on the line
248 PC) 00728
- 2 -
of the property of the parties of the first
part; thence, with a new dividing line
through the property of the parties of the
first .part S. 26° 09' 36" W. 1184.75 feet to
a pin set on the southerly side of the
aforesaid 20 -foot road right of way; thence,
along and with the southerly line of said
right of way N. 77 13' 30" W. 43.47 feet
to a pin set; thence, continuing with the
southerly line of said right of way, N. 63°
01' 23" W. 41.13 feet to the place of
BEGINNING and containing 5.00 acres, as
shown on a survey for Philip M. and Brenda
G. Argabright prepared by T. P. 'Parker &
Son, Engineers and Surveyors, Ltd., dated
June 12, 1986, a copy of said plat being
attached hereto and made a part hereof; and
BEING the same property conveyed to Roger
0. Patterson, et ux, by deed from Virginia
Mae Patterson, et vir, dated January 7,
1985, and recorded in the Clerk's Office
of the Circuit Court of the County of
Roanoke, Virginia in Deed Book 1216, Page
1055.
This conveyance is made subject to all effective ease-
ments, restrictions and conditions affecting the property herein
conveyed.
WITNESS the following signatures and seals:
(SEAL)
ROG R 0. PATTERSON
SEAL)
MI HELLE PATTERSON
STATE OF VIRGINIA )
) TO -WIT:
CITY OF SALEM )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
5 . ®0 C. Arw X-T 1E
BEMR� CONIVE-(ED TO "�? 0 - 1
- or •
'3
PWILIP M-� BRENDA G. ARGA5RIGV4T 0-1
71-115 PROPERTY NOT
BE USED AS -, 5E p AZ4 - 7V -
Z)ZZ607 _
Sr BL To BE COM31meE) )k%
47 rO 10SALEM
WITH AtDj0Ik1IWc, pp 0 p E - pp I- VICE M 17Y MAP
0 NJ Ly. V.- 0
0
REMAJklIkIct PRO PF
P - T -, ( OF
ROGER t MIC14F-LF- PATTERZ-)ON
24o.48 AC,.
ID' B- 12 1 (D PG 10 515
PWILIP M. ARG,6,eR11G14T
OL'D
D. B. Ila 9 PG. 454 rim THE SUBJECT PROPERTY 13 NOT
WITHIN THE Lrmits OF THE 100
YEAR FLOOD BOUNDARY AS SHOWN
ON THE MA FLOOD BOUNDARY
OF A 5.00 AC- -TR4,C-7- 15)-TUATE. 01177 RTE . 80-T
BEIMCz CONVEYED 15"Y
RCD(ILP-W, M ICRF-X-F- PAT T 0 tQ
CATAWBA MAGV57aRIAL DISTRICT
RGAMOKE COUNT--e
VIRGINIA
BY., T. P. PARKER & SON
ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS J TD.
SALEM , VIRGINIA W
= american blueprint of Columbia
BOUXI 109 PAGE 454 -
THIS DEED, made and entered into this 24th day of November,
1978, by and between VIRGINIA MAE PATTERSON, Widow, party of the
first part, and PHILIP M. ARGABRIGHT, SR. and BRENDA G. WRIGHT,
as joint tenants, parties of the second part.
W I T N E S S E T H
THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of TEN ($10.00)
DOLLARS, cash in hand paid by the parties of the second part unto
the party of the first part, and other good and valuable con-
sideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the
party of the first part does hereby BARGAIN, SELL, GRANT and
CONVEY, with Covenants of General Warranty of Title and Modern
English Covenants, unto Philip M. Argabright, Sr. and Brenda G.
Wright, as joint tenants with the right of survivorship, all that
certain tract or parcel of land situate in the County of Roanoke,
Virginia, and more particularly described as follows, to-wit:
COMMENCING at the southeast corner of that certain
4 acre tract as shown on plat by T. P. Parker &
Son, Engineers & Surveyors, dated October 17, 1978,
a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part
of this Deed; thence N. 41° 08' W. 454.40 feet to
a point; thence N. 32° 16' E. 400.00 feet to a
point; thence S. 41° 08' E. 454.40 feet to a point;
thence S. 32° 16' W. 400.00 feet to a point, which
said point is the place of beginning, and contain-
ing 4 acres as shown on the hereinabove - described
plat; and
BEING a part of the same property conveyed to Vir-
ginia Mae Patterson by Deed of record in Deed Book.
343, page 449, of record in the Roanoke County Cir-
cuit Court Clerk's Office.
The party of the first part does further grand and convey
unto the parties of the second part, their heirs and assigns, an
easement for ingress and egress from the easterly line over the
remaining property of Virginia Mae Patterson as shown on the
hereinabove- described plat and along those lines and distances as
--shown on the hereinabove- described plat to the Kilby property
line shown on the hereinabove -- described plat. It is understood
that there exists an additional 20 -foot easement over the Kilby
CHAS. B. PHILLIPS
ATTORNEY AT LAW
SALEM, VIRGINIA
land to Vir Secondar Route 807. DOOKI 109 PAGE455
This Deed is made subject to all easements, restrictions
and reservations of record affectin title to same.
WITNESS the followin si and seal:
r
(SEAL)
VTR MAE PATTERSON
STATE OF VIRGINIA,
OF to -wit:
The fore instrument was acknowled before me b
0
VIRGINIA MAE PATTERSON, Widow, this -, of November, 1978.
. . ... ...... Notar Pub 1ic7__
M commission expires: "'f"e_ -- U--
State TaX In tpp Clerk's Office of he Circuit Court for the Count of Roanoke, Va. this'
Count Tai da of Vi f —.19:7/9this instrument was presented, and
Transfer Fee
with the Certificate of acknowled thereto annexed, admitted to record at
Cierk's F.W $ -54.1,
,?,'�q-_S_.0'cl0ck_2M. The taxes imposed b par. 58 - 54 and 58
Flats $ y -.p
of the code have been paid.. Clerk
120 '220 R T Dep. Qlqr�,
Total B
J
CHAS. B. PHILLIPS
ATTORNEY AT LAW
SALEM, VIRGINIA
BOOK I PAGE 456
ol� *1 OXC2
44 XIt-
Pte
"
astx� ' \ cr
1 0 0
0
0
\-p
'4'
\lL
-�
--\D
0
o'
4-oo Ac..
0 \
v I rk " 1 N 1 A N
I HERFE4Y CERTIFY THAT THIS SCALE: 1 " .. . : - - - -- toc)
PLAT O 5 k 15 CORRECT, SCALE: T. F. PARKER & SON DATE: 0r- \ 197B
ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS
8 y N Z!C)Bc)4.
SAL Em VIRGINIA A-
CERTIFIED LANE) SURVEYOR I
0 0
\-p
"g
-�
--\D
0
0 \
q yp"
bX\ 4f,
174'
A PpRovF- r-.):
N LTH o p
11-11-79
56--Y. RDAWDV-E Co. LYNN. cc'mm. 'DATE
T. P PARKER
N
Ls
LAND SURVEYOR
40
CERTIFICATE NO.
cp
Tn
Al
42b
VICINITY MhlF
� D
LAND
7T
e) I
\
Tb SALC-A4
el 1.
4-Go
4GO -
f'-t FOR
Cr. ow
� R C--)
�1\
M. 9-01 A P5 �4
-----FH[LkP
C0
4.00 ACRE PSEI�lCt,, t4\'/F-YF-V--)
TRAcT
PZ�Y
Vi P'-c 101 A, MAE �TT EIZ!SC) tii
\ '4
�, J � a � 1 � �
y �
C A, TAW r3 A 1 461 X -ERINL F)kbTR►c-T
ro p er' � \ \�
ROAWOKE COUNTY
v I rk " 1 N 1 A N
I HERFE4Y CERTIFY THAT THIS SCALE: 1 " .. . : - - - -- toc)
PLAT O 5 k 15 CORRECT, SCALE: T. F. PARKER & SON DATE: 0r- \ 197B
ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS
8 y N Z!C)Bc)4.
SAL Em VIRGINIA A-
CERTIFIED LANE) SURVEYOR I
November 17, 1978
Mr. Phillip M. Argabright
Route 3, Box 421
Salem, Virginia 24153
Dear Mr. Argabright:
At their meeting on November 15, 1978
County Board of Zoning Appeals considered and a f the Roanoke
for a variance from the Roanoke County Zoning Orrdinancce create
a 4.0 acre tract havin no ublic road fronta e but ha
vin a
easement of access being located off the end of St deeded
in the Glenvar area. ate Route 807
You may consider this letter to be your variance permit and I
suggest that you take it with you to the Building Inspector's Office
when applying for a building permit so he will not question issuance.
Enclosed is a bill for your share of the legal advertisin fee
and a copy of the full advertisement and amount'of a g
the Time s - -- Woo -I.d_ ___ - As P yment due from
it has been divided accordingly.
v�rcra -ueturning payment, retain the white co
receipt and return the yellow co pY of the invoice as your
proportionate share of the advertisingngostttoyCur check for your
P. O. Box 998, Salem, Virginia 24153,
County of Roanoke,
If you have any questions, please do n
this office. of hesitate to contact
Very truly yours,
RWH "v
s b a
Robert W. Hooper, Secretary
Enclosures Roanoke County Board of Zoning Appeals
cc: R. A. Franklin, Building Inspector
� ` � � �
.- ���\ � \�-
�3 :�
z� � � � >�,.
� \ : - § ? \ , � ����
»a.� y`� \� \ \.■
� . .
> 2 ) > � � ��
. _�'
:'.
y� \� ,
�:'� ,
_ \ \\ �
a ' g —
own
Ia
,, _ %- ®
F
.' - R
9r ' Ir
1p - 3u
"
- ^Y Y U, -i
n
lou
IW Y
a
•
A
W.
A6
■
W YI
- ■"
@
i
L
of n
■
wl n
,
O
61
N
' • L1��
es
m - •
Y �
�.
® —
• T
.I I
r -9-M —
III
1
a � •
z I
I. ® ■
II _
Municode Page 1 of 3
SEC. 30 -32.- AG -3 AGRICULTURAL/RURAL PRESERVE DISTRICT.
Sec. 30- 32-1.- Purpose,
(A) The AG -3, agricultural /rural preserve district consists of land primarily used as farmland, woodlands, and
widely scattered residential development located within the rural service area. Also found in these areas are
lands with steep slopes, and groundwater recharge areas. Many of the county's unique natural and scenic
resources are found in this district. The purpose of this district is to maintain these areas essentially in their
rural state, and attempt to protect sensitive and unique land resources from degradation as recommended in
the rural preserve land use category of the comprehensive plan. This may be accomplished by maintaining the
existing agricultural lands and preventing the encroachment of incompatible land uses. Non -farm residents
should recognize that they are located in an agricultural environment where the right -to -farm has been
established as county policy. This district is also intended to minimize the demand for unanticipated public
improvements and services, such as public sewer and water, by reducing development densities and
discouraging large scale development.
(Ord. No. 042799-11., § If, 4 -2 7 -99: Ord. No. 042208 -10, § 1. 4-22 -08)
Sec. 30- 32 -2.- Permitted Uses.
(A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this
ordinance. An asterisk ( *) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use
and design standards, for those specific uses.
1. Agricultural and Forestry Uses
Agriculture
Farm Employee Housing
Forestry operations
Stable, Private *
Stable, Commercial's
Wayside Stand *
2. Residential Uses
Accessory Apartment *
Home Occupation, Type Il
Manufactured Home *
Manufactured Home, Accessory
Manufactured Home, Emergency
Multiple Dog Permit *
Residential Human Care Facility
Single- Family Dwelling, Detached
Temporary portable storage containers`
3. Civic Uses
Community Recreation
Family Day Care Home
Park and Ride Facility *
Public Parks and Recreational Areas
Safety Services *
Utility Services, Minor
4. Commercial Uses
Agricultural Services
Bed and Breakfast *
Kennel, Commercial
Veterinary Hospital /Clinic
5, Industrial Uses
Custom Manufacturing
6. Miscellaneous Uses
Amateur Radio Tower
(B)
http: / /library.municode.com/ print. aspx? clientID = 12222 &HTMRequest=:http %3a %2f%2flib... 6/112011
Municode
Page 2 of 3
The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30 -19. An asterisk ( *) indicates
additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those
specific uses.
1. Agricultural Uses
Commercial Feedlots
1.5. Residential Uses
Alternative Discharging Sewage Systems
2. Civic Uses
Camps *
Cemetery `
Correctional Facilities
Day Care Center *
Religious Assembly
Utility Services, Major
3. Commercial Uses
Campgrounds *
4. Industrial Uses
Composting *
Landfill, Construction Debris '
Landfill, Rubble *
Landfill, Sanitary
Resource Extraction
5. Miscellaneous Uses
Aviation Facilities, Private *
Broadcasting Tower
Outdoor Gatherings
Shooting Range, Outdoor *
(Ord. No. 42793 -20, § lt, 4- 27 -93; Ord, No. 62293 -12, § 8 6- 22 -93; Ord. No. 82493 -8. § 2 8- 24 -93; Ord. No. 42694 -12, § 7, 4-
26 -94: Ord. No_ 62795 -10, 6- 27 -95: Ord. No. 042799 -11, § 2,.4-27-99; Oro'. No, 072605 -7, § 1, 7- 26 -05: Ord. No. 042208 -16 §
1 4- 22 -08; Ord. No, 052609 -22. § 1 5- 26 -09)
Sec. 30- 32 -3.- Site Development Regulations,
General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use
and Design Standards.
(A) Minimum lot requirements.
All lots, regardless of sewer and water provisions:
a . Area: 3 acres (130,680 square feet).
b. Frontage: 200 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
C. Maximum width to depth ratio: 1 to 5 (W to D) on streets in existence prior to the adoption of this
ordinance.
(B) Minimum setback requirements.
1, Front yard:
a . Principal structures: 50 feet.
b. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line.
2. Side yard:
a . Principal structures: 25 feet.
b. Accessory structures: 25 feet behind front building line or 10 feet behind rear building line.
3. Rear yard:
a . Principal structures: 35 feet.
b. Accessory structures: 10 feet.
4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets.
5. Where the principal structure is more than 150 feet from the street, accessory buildings may be located
150 feet from the street and 25 feet from any side property line.
(C) Maximum height of structures.
1. All structures: 45 feet.
http: / /1ibrary.muni code, com/ print. aspx? clientID= 12222 &HTMRequest =http %3a %2f%2flib... 611120
- Municode
(D) Maximum coverage.
1. Building coverage: 5 percent of the total lot area.
2. Lot coverage: 20 percent of the total lot area.
(Ord, No. 62293 -12, § 10, 6- 22 -93)
Page 3 of 3
http:ll li brary. mun icode.com /Print.aspx ?clientID= 12222 &HTMRequest = http %3a %2f /o2flib... 6/1/2011
SEC. 30 -41. - R -1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.
Sec. 30 -41 -1. - Purpose.
(A) The R -1, low density residential district is established for areas of the county within the urban
service area with existing low- middle density residential development, with an average density of from
one (1) to three (3) units per acre, and land which appears appropriate for such development. These
areas are generally consistent with the neighborhood conservation land use category as recommended
in the comprehensive plan. In addition, where surrounding development and the level of public services
warrant, these areas coincide with the development category recommended in the plan. This district is
intended to provide the highest degree of protection from potentially incompatible uses and residential
development of a significantly different density, size, or scale, in order to maintain the health, safety,
appearance and overall quality of life of existing and future neighborhoods. In addition to single - family
residences, only uses of a community nature which are generally deemed compatible are permitted in
this district. This would include parks and playgrounds, schools and other similar neighborhood
activities.
(Ord. No. 042799 -11, § 1f., 4- 27 -99; Ord. No. 042208 -16, § 1, 4- 22 -08)
Sec. 30 -41 -2. - Permitted uses.
(A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in
this ordinance. An asterisk ( *) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in
article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses.
1. Agricultural and Forestry Uses
Stable, Private*
2. Residential Uses
Accessory Apartment*
Home Occupation, Type
Manufactured Home *
Manufactured Home, Emergency
Multiple Dog Permit*
Residential Human Care Facility
Single - Family Dwelling, Detached (For Zero Lot Line Option - *)
Single - Family Dwelling, Attached *
Single - Family Dwelling, Attached and Detached (Cluster Subdivision Option - *)
Temporary portable storage containers
3. Civic Uses
Community Recreation
Park and Ride Facility *
Public Parks and Recreational Areas
Utility Services, Minor
4. Miscellaneous Uses
Amateur Radio Tower
Wind Energy System, Small*
(B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30 -19. An asterisk
( *) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design
standards, for those specific uses.
1. Residential Uses
Accessory Apartment
Alternative Discharging Sewage System
Home Beauty /Barber Salon
2. Civic Uses
Cemetery *
Crisis Center
Day Care Center
Educational Facilities, Primary /Secondary
Family Day Care Home
Religious Assembly *
Utility Services, Major
3. Commercial Uses
Bed and Breakfast
4. Miscellaneous Uses
Outdoor Gatherings
(Ord. No. 42793 -20, § 11, 4- 27 -93; Ord. No. 62293 -12, §§ 3, 8, 6- 22 -93; Ord. No. 82493 -8, § 2, 8- 24 -93;
Ord. No. 62795 -10, 6- 27 -95; Ord. No. 042799 -11, § 2, 4- 27 -99; Ord. No. 042500 -9, § 11, 4- 25 -00; Ord.
No. 072605 -7, § 1 7- 26 -05; Ord. No. 042208 -16, § 1, 4- 22 -08; Ord. No. 052609 -22, § 1, 5- 26 -09; Ord.
No. 030811 -1, § 1, 3 -8 -11; Ord. No. 052411 -9, § 1, 5- 24 -11)
Sec. 30 -41 -3. - Site Development Regulations.
General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article
IV, Use and Design Standards.
(A) Minimum lot requirements.
1. All lots served by private well and sewage disposal systems:
a. Area: 0.75 acre (32,670 square feet).
b. Frontage: 90 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
2. Lots served by either public sewer or water:
a. Area: 20,000 square feet.
b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
3. All lots served by both public sewer and water:
a. Area: 7,200 square feet.
b. Frontage: 60 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
(B) Minimum setback requirements.
1. Front yard:
a. Principal structures: 30 feet.
b. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line.
2. Side yard:
a. Principal structures: 10 feet.
b. Accessory structures: 10 feet behind front building line or 3 feet behind rear building
line.
3. Rear yard:
a. Principal structures: 25 feet.
b. Accessory structures: 3 feet.
4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets.
(C) Maximum height of structures.
1. Height limitations:
a. Principal structures: 45 feet.
b. Accessory structures: 15 feet, or 25 feet provided they comply with the setback
requirements for principal structures.
(D) Maximum coverage.
1. Building coverage: 30 percent of the total lot area for all buildings and 7 percent for
accessory buildings.
2. Lot coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area.
(Ord. No. 62293 -12, § 10, 6- 22 -93; Ord. No. 42694 -12, § 8, 4- 26 -94; Ord. No. 042208 -16, § 1 4- 22 -08)
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, TUESDAY, JANUARY 22, 2013
ORDINANCE REZONING 12.9 ACRES LOCATED AT 5032 STANLEY
FARM ROAD FROM R -1, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, TO
AG -3, AGRICULTURAL /RURAL PRESERVE DISTRICT, FOR THE
PUROSE OF ALLOWING AGRICULTURAL USES ON THE PROPERTY,
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (TAX MAP NO. 54.02-4-74.1 54.02-
4-73, 54.02 -4 -74.2 54.02 -4- 74.3) UPON THE APPLICATION OF PHILIP
ARGABRIGHT
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on December 11, 2012, and
the second reading and public hearing were held January 22, 2013; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this
matter on January 7, 2013; and
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing
approximately 12.9 acres, as described herein, and located at 5032 Stanley Farm Road
(Tax Map Number 54.02 -4 -74.1, 54.02 -4 -73, 54.02 -4 -74.2, 54.02 -4 -74.3) in the Catawba
Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R -1, Low Density
Residential District, to the zoning classification of AG -3, Agricultural /Rural Preserve District.
2. That this action is taken upon the application of Philip Argabright.
3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
Being 12.9 acres of real estate located at 5032 Stanley Farm Road and further
described as Tax Map Nos. 54.02 -4 -74.1, 54.02 -4 -73, 54.02 -4 -74.2 54.02 -4 -74.3.
4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
Page 1 of 2
ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to
amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by
this ordinance.
Page 2 of 2
P -2
PETITIONER: Friendship Health and Rehab Center
CASE NUMBER: 02-01/2013
Board of Supervisors Consent 1 St Reading Date: December 11, 2012
Planning Commission Hearing Date: January 7, 2013
Board of Supervisors Hearing & 2 nd Reading Date: January 22, 2013
A. REQUEST
To rezone 10.27 acres from R -1, Low Density Residential District, to C -2,
General Commercial District and to obtain a special use permit for a
nursing home and life care facility.
B. CITIZEN COMMENTS
Five citizens spoke at the hearing. Greg Palecki spoke regarding the
stormwater pond and stated he would prefer underground detention if
possible, he also suggested turn lanes as well as a traffic circle at the
intersection of Buck Mountain Road and Starkey Road. Thomas
Brokenbraw stated that the proposed use would be good for the area.
Warren Coburn spoke regarding the required landscaping and screening
and requested additional buffering including increasing the size of the
buffer yard as well as incorporating berms. Steve Strauss spoke in favor of
the project and stated that he had previously looked into developing the
same site into approximately 50 homes. Roy Mitchell spoke regarding the
required screening and requested that the screen be constructed of a solid
material.
C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Tara Pattisall presented the staff report. Richard Sayers, legal counsel for
the petitioner, discussed the site plan and reasons for obtaining this
rezoning and special use permit. Mr. Marrano asked if the applicant would
consider proffering to build the turn lanes off of Starkey Road, as well as
underground detention. Mr. Sayers stated that they would rather wait to
see if either was required before committing to the cost. Ms. Hooker asked
about the small portion of the property not included on the concept plan.
Mr. Sayers stated that the piece of property is unusable. Ms. Pattisall
stated that rezoning that portion would not limit its future use if purchased
by a neighbor. Mr. Marrano asked about the required buffering and
screening. Ms. Pattisall explained that a Type C buffer is required
adjacent to all R -1 property. She also explained the two variations of Type
C buffer which are allowable. Mr. Marrano asked for additional
clarification regarding required berms in the Type C buffer. Ms. Pattisall
explained that berms are not a required part of the buffer. Mr. Marrano
asked about the materials for the required screening and Ms. Pattisall
stated that materials could be narrowed down by applying a condition.
Page 1 of 2
P -2
D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS
1. The site will be developed in substantial conformity with the concept
plan dated December 4, 2012 titled "Friendship Health & Rehabilitation
Center South," prepared by Freeman White, Inc. subject to those
changes which may be required by Roanoke County during
comprehensive site plan review.
E. CONDITIONS
1. The site shall be developed in general conformance to the architectural
renderings titled "Friendship Health & Rehabilitation Center South"
prepared by Freeman White, Inc. dated September 2012.
2. Freestanding light poles on site shall be shielded "cut -off' types no
more than eighteen (18) feet high and arranged so glare is not cast
onto adjoining properties.
3. A Type C buffer shall be installed along all property lines except for the
frontage along Starkey Road. If option 2 is utilized, a wood or vinyl
stockade fence and large evergreen trees (instead of large deciduous
trees) shall be installed.
4. No trash service or deliveries to the site shall take place between
11:00 pm and 7:00 am.
F. COMMISSION ACTION
Mr. Marrano made a motion to recommend approval of the petition with
the one proffered condition (rezoning) and four conditions associated with
the special use permit. The motion passed 5 -0.
G. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
None.
H. ATTACHMENTS: X Concept Plan X Vicinity Map
X Staff Report X Other
Philip Thompson, Secretary
Roanoke County Planning Commission
Page of
Address (if Sill ject Propei-ty-+ 5647 S- (0 1- ke Raig d
Cave Spi-In W, Osterial District
Ro,anokc Cotint Vir
T ux Ma 087.18-01-3-7.00-0000
Preseld zon' ' 1 — Low DCLISit Y Rc side rLtial
P rat puse(i zorflughr: C2 Genci-gil. Commcmial DiSLrict
A
Apph ca,nbi N ames: F-ri endship Hen 11 h and Re] i-ab CaMe r S OuLh, Itic
Fdendsbip lic-fillh ami Rchab Center, hic..
On'.11el.: Mildued A, Si,vilith
PROFFER
do her proffer itic followin condition in CD-a
v ullcliatt NvAll the
application to rez oil c thc subject l' )ro l ) ert y ,
The. site wflL be dvvQ1o in sLibstantial con for-mily xvill, the con cep plan dated Deceinw-T- 4.
2012 titled "Priend sill p -Health & Rehabilitation Center SouVh, prepared b Free ma n Widle, Inc., subject to those
clue n s Aich ima be re q u ired b Roa ii oke Cou m durin eompmhensivc s it o pla-ti rev iew .
ge S,
v44
Drato,d this da of
Respectfulh. submdtcd -
A.
1drCd A 6%v [wc
440
,e r q [t 'Rol tib 1C i Lw r. I ti A ppl icani
B it N.
rev
Frien 110 std R,clire Cciaer Sowl- [tic., Applicant.
B
U:-tA (V Ell M-J-'rLAjv!461 i Ve.Akh :wd Rdub Comer -Kcd i. hic UG4-PrOMr.dOCx
im
e OL
A
m A:I
r.
n i .
m
3
L 7iA
Vj
O ' '
a
p �
i lk,
y A
j _
�i
Ni
s
II
STAFF REPORT
Petitioner: Friendship Health and Rehab Center
Request: Rezone 10.27 acres from R -1, Low Density Residential District, to C -2, General
Commercial District and to obtain a special use permit for a nursing home and life
care facility
Location: 5647 Starkey Road
Magisterial District: Cave Spring
Proffered Conditions: 1. The site will be developed in substantial conformance with the concept plan
(Rezoning) dated December 4, 2012 titled "Friendship Health & Rehabilitation Center South"
prepared by Freeman White, Inc. subject to those changes which may be
required by Roanoke County during comprehensive site plan review.
Suggested Conditions: 1. The site shall be developed in general conformance to the architectural renderings
(Special Use Permit) titled "Friendship Health & Rehabilitation Center South" prepared by Freeman
White, Inc. dated September 2012.
2. Freestanding light poles on site shall be shielded "cut -off" types no more than
eighteen (18) feet high and arranged so glare is not cast onto adjoining
properties.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Friendship Health and Rehab Center is requesting to rezone 10.27 acres from R -1, Low Density Residential District
with proffered conditions, to C -2, General Commercial District with a Special Use Permit for a nursing home and life
care facility. The applicant plans to construct a 120 -bed inpatient skilled nursing facility for the primary use of
inpatient orthopedic rehabilitation. A later phase of the development may include several independent cottage units.
According to the 2005 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan, the Future Land Use Designation of the property is
split with the half that fronts on Starkey Road being designated as Transition. Transition areas are typically buffers
between higher intensity developments such as highways and commercial areas and lower intensity uses such as
residential areas. The back half of the property which fronts onto Crescent Boulevard is designated as
Neighborhood Conservation. Neighborhood Conservation is an area where established single - family neighborhoods
are delineated and the conservation of the existing development pattern is encouraged.
1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
A nursing home and a life care facility are allowed as special uses in the C -2 District. Nursing home and
life care facility are defined in the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as follows:
Nursing home: A use providing bed care and in- patient services for persons requiring regular medical
attention but excluding a facility providing surgical or emergency medical services and excluding a facility
providing care for alcoholism, drug addiction, mental disease, or communicable disease. Nursing homes
have doctors or licensed nurses on duty.
Life care facility: A residential facility primarily for the continuing care of the elderly, providing for transitional
housing progressing from independent living in various dwelling units, with or without kitchen facilities, and
culminating in nursing home type care where all related uses are located on the same lot. Such facility may
include other services integral to the personal and therapeutic care of the residents.
See attached C -2 regulations
2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
Back_ rq ound — The primary structure on the property was built in 1925 and the property has been in use as a
single family residence since then. The parcel has been for sale for several years and was at one point
considered as a location for the new South County Library.
Topography /Vegetation — The property slopes uphill approximately 25' from both Crescent Boulevard and
Starkey Road to a knoll in the center of the property where the house is currently located. The property
continues to slope upward another 20 -30' towards Arthur Street. There is little vegetation on the site except
for the strip of the parcel which fronts onto Arthur Street which is heavily wooded.
Surrounding Neighborhood — The property is surrounded on two sides by R -1, Low Density Residential
District zoning comprised of a neighborhood of single - family homes. On the south side, the property is
bordered by two R -1 single family residences as one C -1, Office District parcel with a single - family
residence. Directly across Starkey Road, the property faces a huge portion of R -3, Medium Density Multi -
Family Residential District as well as two additional C -1 parcels.
The surrounding neighborhood on Starkey Road has a variety of both zonings and uses. One parcel away
from the subject parcel is Starkey Medical, across the street are both condo and apartment complexes, and
there is a church and several offices and at the juncture of Starkey Road and Buck Mountain Road.
3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Site Layout/Architecture —The current single family residence on the property will be demolished. The
proposed facility will consist of four one -story buildings, residential in character, containing 30 resident
rooms each and providing short -term rehabilitation services. The finished buildings will accommodate 120
patients and will have approximately 45 staff members. The property will include an interior courtyard for
residents to use as they regain their mobility.
Access to the site will be from Starkey Road with a drop off and guest parking area in front of the building
facing Starkey Road. Staff parking and a loading area will be located in the rear. A minimum 30'
landscaping buffer will be required in the area adjacent to the R -1 properties.
A future phase of the development may include the construction of individual cottage units on the portion of
the property adjacent to Crescent Boulevard. The strip of land connecting Arthur Street is in negotiation to
be sold to the adjacent homeowner to create road access for their land- locked parcel.
Access /Traffic Circulation — VDOT has stated that a traffic impact analysis will be required to determine
whether right or left turn lanes into the site will be needed. No traffic light is needed.
Fire & Rescue /Utilities — The secondary exit onto Crescent Boulevard is not needed as long as fire trucks
are able to maneuver within 150' of the remotest portion of the building.
0,
Economic Development No comments.
Western VA Water Authority No comments.
Community Meetings — A community meeting was held by the petitioner on Thursday, November 8, 2012,
with approximately 26 citizens in attendance. The petitioner explained that they were hosting the meeting as
outreach to the adjacent property owners and the need for this project. He also explained how they must
prove this need to the State Board which governs nursing home facilities before they can even acquire a
license for a new facility. The petitioner fielded many questions regarding the need for the access road that
connects to Crescent Boulevard. Other concerns raised were the lack of buffer along to road and parking lot
lighting. The petitioner addressed that the buffer was not yet included on the concept plan and that the
proposed lighting consists of 12' posts with reflectors to shield the light. The petitioner explained that the
ambulances which service this facility are only transporting patients to and from surgery so no sirens will be
necessary. He also pointed out that their largest delivery truck that will bring food once a week to the facility.
A second community meeting was hosted by County staff on Thursday, December 6, 2012 with
approximately 41 citizens in attendance. County staff explained the rezoning and special use permit
process. The petitioner explained their intent and some specifics about the project. The petitioner provided
an updated concept plan removing the secondary exit onto Crescent Boulevard. This updated concept plan
was well received with the citizens, especially those who attended the first meeting. Questions were posed
regarding traffic impact and staff responded with VDOTs comments that the traffic counts are not high
enough to warrant a light but a traffic impact analysis will be required to determine if left or right turn lanes
are necessary. There were many questions about stormwater management, which staff explained will be
dealt with during the site plan review process, but is not part of the rezoning application. There were many
inquiries about what may happen after the rezoning should the petitioner change their mind and want to
build something else. Staff explained that proffering substantial conformance to the site plan will require the
development to look substantially like the concept plan, i.e. no high rises or additional buildings, and that
any deviation from that would require the petitioner to go back through the public hearing process to amend
the site plan or remove the proffer.
4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN
The Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan designates this site as split with the half that fronts on Starkey
Road being designated as Transition. Transition areas are typically buffers between higher intensity
developments such as highways and commercial areas and lower intensity uses such as residential areas.
The back half of the property which fronts onto Crescent Boulevard is designated as Neighborhood
Conservation. Neighborhood Conservation is an area where established single - family neighborhoods are
delineated and the conservation of the existing development pattern is encouraged.
5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS
Friendship Health and Rehab Center is requesting to rezone 10.27 acres from R -1, Low Density Residential
District with proffered conditions to C -2, General Commercial District with a Special Use permit for a nursing
home and life care facility in order to construct a 120 inpatient skilled nursing facility for the primary use of
inpatient orthopedic rehabilitation. A second phase of development may include independent cottage
homes.
The proposed project conforms to the Future Land Use. The front half of the property, designated
Transition, is where the bulk of the rehabilitation facility is intended to be located. This use fits in with the
Transition definition. The back half of the property is designated Neighborhood Conservation, and the
proposal of cottage homes for this area also conforms to the future land use.
A rezoning to C -2 would be in character with the other zoning located nearby including other commercial,
high density residential, and industrial. The adjacent medical aesthetic office makes this proposed use
consistent with what is currently surrounding the property and the density for this use is consistent with the
multi - family residential uses across the street.
CASE N U B M E R: 02- 0112013
PREPARED BY: Tara Pattisall
HEARING DATES: PC: 01/07/2013 BOS: 01/22/2013
ATTACHMENTS: Proffers
Application
Aerial Map
Floodplain Map
Zoning Map
Land Use Map
C -2, General Commerical District Standards
11
County of Roanoke For Staff Use OnIV
ry
Community Development
Date received:
Received bv:
Planning & Zoning
J
Application tee:
�� b (�
PCI»date
---I a_Q0A �)
'
5204 Bernard Dri
P O B ox 2 9$00
Roanoke, VA 24018 --0798
Placa issued:
BOS date:
(540) 772 - 2068 FAX (540) 776-7155
Case Number
A LL APPLICA NTS E
Check type of application filed (check all that apple)
N Rezoning EO Special Use ❑ Variance J Waiver ❑ Administrative Appeal ❑ Conip Plan (15.2 -2232) Review
Applicants name /address \v /zip Phone:
Friendship Health and Rehab Center South, Inc. Work: _(540 ) 265 - 2061
Friendship Health and Rehab Center, Inc. Cell 4: f5 40 529 -4043
367 Hershberger Road, N.W., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Fax No.: 540) 265 - 2254
Oxviler's name /address w/zip Phone #: 5 40) 774 - 7303
Mildred Atkins Smith Fork:
_
7171 Hollyberry Road Fax No. 4: v
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Property Location
5547 Starkey Road
tMagisterial District: Cave S
1 g
Community Planning area Cave Spring
U g
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Tax Map No .: 087.18 -01- 37.00 -0000
Existing Zoning: R1 - Low Density Residential
Size of parcel(s): Acres: _ 10.27
Existing Land Use Single Family Residence
REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERKIT, RAI VER AND COMP PLAN (15.2 - 2232) R.EVIEfV APPLICANTS (RIS/kV /CP) i
Proposed Zoning: C -2 General Commercial District
Proposed Land Use: 120 Bed Skilled Nursing Facility (Phase I) and Adult Care Facility (Phase II)
Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area. xvidth, and frontage requirements of the reLluested district?
Yes x No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST.
Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type" Yes x: No
IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST
If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered %with this request`? yes. No X
IAA RIA NCE, PPA I P ER AND A DiVIINIS TRA TI VE APPEAL APPLICANTS (VII FIAA)
VarianceiW ai\ cr of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in carder to:
Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to
Appeal of Interpretation of Sections): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance
Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Nfap to
Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANV OF THESE ITEMS
ARE MISSING OR INCOINIPLETE.
RIS/\\'ICP V/Aa R/Sl V /0) % /AA RISA\'I( :P V/AA
X Consultation x 8 1/2`t x l 1 " concept plan Application fee
Applicatiotl s _ Metes and bounds description ��:�;+ Proffers. if applicable
Justification : Water and sewer application x Adjoining property owners
I hereby certi R- that I am either the oxvner of the property or the o���ner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting Witli the knowledge and consent
f the owner Friendship Hea a Re a Center South, Inc. and Friendship Health and Rehab Center, Inc.
B Ow ner's Signature
R ark e, Jr., CEO and President of both entities
JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (I5.2 -2232) REVIEW
REQUESTS
Applicant
Friendship Health and Rehab Center South, Inc. and Friendship H ea l th and Rehab Center, Inc.
The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2- -2232) review requests to
determine the need and . justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the
following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary.
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose fou €ld at the
beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance.
See Attachment Number 1 Attached.
Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke Count} Corn€nunity
Plan.
See Attachment Number 1 Attached.
. . ... ..... ... .... _ .... ......_ .... .... -
Please describe the impact(s) of the request oil the property itself, the adjoining pi•ope € and the surrounding area, as well as
the impacts on public services and facilities, including waterlsex -% er, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue.
See Attachment Number 1 Attached.
See Attachment Number 2 for a list of exhibits attached in support of this Application.
See Attachment Number 3 for a description of a possible Phase II development of the area on the original
Concept Plan captioned "Future Expansion" and Exhibit L the revised Concept Plan updating the square
footage information and containing one possible rendering of the duplex cottages currently contemplated.
JUST FICATION - OR `, �` RI
. F 'LrA ANCE'` RE': IJtST - -
Applicant Friiendshi'p Health and Rehab Center South, Inc. and Friendshi p Health and Rehab Venter, Inc.
The of Zoni ng A ppeal s i s required by Section 15.2 -2309 of the Code of V i rgi ni a to consider the f of I owing factors bef ore a variance
can be granted. Please read t he f actors fisted bel carefully and in you r ow n words, describe hove the request meets each factor. If
add ti anal space i s needed, use addit1 anal sheets of paper.
1. The vari ante steal I not be contrary to the publ is i nterest and shel I be i n harmony with the i ntended spi rit and purpose of the
Zoning Ordinance
2. The stri ct appl i cdi on of the zoni n ordi nance wouI d produce undue hardshi p; a hardshi p that approaches conf i scation (as
di sti ngui shed f rom a speci al pr v i I ege or co veni enc and would prohi bi t or unreasonabl y restrict the use of the property.
3. The hardshi p i s not shared by other properti es i n the same zo n i n di stri ct or ivi ci n ty. Such hardshi ps shout d be addressed by
the Board of Supervisors as amendments to the Zoni ng Ordinance.
4. The ivari ance w I I not be of a substanti a] det ri went to the adj acent propert es or the character of the di stri ct.
JUSTIFICATION :FOR ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL REUES.T
Applicant Friendship Health and Rehab Center South, Inc. and Friendship Health and Rehab Center, Inc.
Pi ease respond to the f of l owi ng as thoroughly as possible, If additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper,
1 . Reasons for appeal
12. Evidence supporting claim:
HE 1MUST _
_CAN. EPT PLAN: C C
A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with t he appl i cati on. The concept plan shall graphically depict the
land use change development or variance that i s to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or
design i ssues arisi ng from the request. In such cases i nvol vi ng rezoni ngs, the appl i cant may proffer condi ti onsto l i mit thef uture
use and devill opment of the property and by so doi ng, correct any def i ci enci es t hat may not be manageabi e by County permi tti ng
regulations.
Theconcept plan should not be conf used with the site pl an or plot plan that is requi red pri or to the issuance of a building permit.
Site pl an and bui I di ng permit procedures ensure compl i ance wi t State and County devill opment reguI at ons and may requi re
changes to the i niti al concept pl an. U n1 ess I i miti ng con di ti ons are proff ered and accepted i n a rezoni ng or i mposed on a speci al
use permit or vari ante, the concept p an may be altered to the extent permi tted by the zoni ng di stri ct and other reguI ations.
A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2.2232) review and variance
applications. The pl an should be prepared by a professi anal si to pl anner. The l evel of detail may vary, depending on the nature
of the request. The County PI anni ng Di vi si on staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the add ti on of extra items, but the
fol I owi n are consi dered mi ni mum:
ALL APPLICANTS
a A ppl i cant name and name of devill opment
b. Date, scale and north arrow
c. Lot size in acres or square f est and di mensi ons
d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties
e. Physi cal feetures such as ground cover, naturai watercourses, f I oodpl ai n, etc.
f . The zoni ng and I and use of al I adj acent propertt es
g. All property lines and easements
h. A I I bui I di n g s, exi sti ng and proposed, and di mensi ons, f I oor area and hei ghts
i . Location, widths and names of al I existing or platted streets or other public ways withi n or add acent to the devil opment
! . Di mensi ons and I ocati ons of al I driveways, parki ng spaces and I oadi ng spaces
Additional information required for REZONING and SPECL4L USE PERMIT APPLICANTS
k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site
1. Any driveways, ent rancestex i t s, curb openi ngs and crossovers
m. Topography map i n a sui tab I a scal a and contour i nterval s
n. Approxi mate street grades and site di stances at i ntersecti ons
o. Locations of al I adjacent f re hydrants
p. A ny prof fered condi ti ons at the site and how they are addressed
q. I f prof ect i s to be phased, pl ease show phase schedul e
I cert at ai it s required in thechecklist above are complete. . .
Sig Wof applicant
I --- 1 02,11
Die
6
Community Development Planning & Zoning Division
a
t
POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFICANALYSISAND /OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
The following is a fist of potentially high traffic - generating land uses and road network situations
that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your
rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request
involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner,
the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the
potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in
order to expedite your application process.
(Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VD 0 T reserve the right to request a traffic
study at any time, as deemed necessary.
High Traffic - Generating Land Uses;
Single - family residential subdivisions, Multi - family residential units, or Apartments with more
than 75 dwelling units
Restaurant (with or without drive - through windows)
• Gas station /Convenience store /Car wash
• Retail shop/Shopping center
Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.)
• Regional public facilities
Educational/Recreational facilities
■ Religious assemblies
Hotel/Motel
• Golf course
• Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic
■ Industrial site /Factory
■ Day care center
• Bank
• Non - specific use requests
Road Network Situations:
• Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500 -ft of intersection of a roadway classified
as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc)
• For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study Is more
than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly
• When required to evaluate access issues
• Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening,
improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six -Yr Road Plan, etc.)
• Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem
• Development would potentially negatively impact exist! ng/planned traffic signal(s)
• Substantial departure from the Community Plan
• Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred ( 100) trips during the peak hour of the
traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750)
trips in an average day
Effective date; April 19, 2005
7
R A
Community Development '
Planning &anin Division
y w
18
NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET
WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION
PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE
The Roanoke County Pi anni ng Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision '
Waiver
Public Street Waiver or Sped al Use Permit petition if new or additional i i s resented at the publi
p p �c
hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Pi anni ng Commissioners resent at the scheduled '
. . • p public
c
hearing that sufficient time was not avail for pl anning staff and/or an outside referral ag enc
• • y to
adequately evaluate and prove de wri tten comments and suggesti ons on the new or adds t r i nformati on nformati
prior
to the scheduled public hearing then the Pi anni ng Commi ssion may vote to continue the etiti on. This
s
continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewi parties to evaluate the new or addi
information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included i n a written memorandu
• m by
planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning n staff Pl i C
p g f to
i
determine f a continuance may be warranted.
POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/ORTRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
The Roanoke County Pi anni ng Commi ssi on reserves the right to conti n ue a Rezoni n Subdi vi si on Waiv
gf
Publ i c Street Waiver, or Specs al Use Permit pets ti on if the County Traf f i c En i neer or staff f ram the Vi r i ni a
s
g, g
Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and /or a traffic impact act stud that wo
. , p y Id be
benef i ci al i n make ng use ecl st on (Note. a t ist of potential land uses and situations that w a I and d w oul d
necessitate further stud} as provided as part of this application package ) .
T hi s co nt i nuance sh a] I aow sucient timefor a]I n rev artiesto evaluatether uired tr
. i ll ffi g p eq aff�c
analyses and /or traff i c mpact study and to prove de written comments and /or su esti ons to the I an n of
. gg p g staff
and the Planning Commission, If a continuance i swarranted, the applicant will be notified of the conti nuance
and the newly scheduled public hearing date.
Friendship Health and Rehab Center South, Inc.
and
Friend ' 3 Health a Rehab Center Inc.
Effective date; April 19, 2005
L�J
ATTACHMENT NUMBER I TO
APPLICATION OF FRIENDSHIP HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER SOUTH, INC. AND
FRIENDSHIP HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER, INC.
A. Compliance with Zoning Ordinance. The proposed development plan fulfills all
objectives stated in Section 30 -54 -1 for the C -2 General Commercial District of Roanoke
County's Code of Ordinances. The proposed facility provides for the efficient and best use of
the property while preserving the residential character prevalent in a portion of the surrounding
neighborhood. The property is currently zoned R1 -- Love Density Residential but is located in
close proximity to numerous properties designated by a variety of zoning classifications,
including C1, C 1 C, C2, C2C, R1, R2, R3 C and 11S. The facility will consist of four (4) one -
story buildings, residential in character, containing 30 resident rooms each and providing short -
term rehabilitation services to a large segment of the county's population. It will also provide a
more convenient location for county residents to obtain the services offered by applicant. The
proposed use of the property is compatible with the myriad of business, commercial, industrial
and residential uses within the existing neighborhood. The property contains sufficient acreage
to satisfy all required visual and noise buffers, offstreet parking and site development standards
in an aesthetically pleasing manner. Wherever possible, staff parking will be located in the back
of the property blocked from sight from Starkey Road and adjoining properties by the facility
and natural vegetation.
B. Conformity with Roanoke County's 2005 Community Plan "Plan" . The
property is located in the Cave Spring planning area and is split between neighborhood
conservation and transition land use designations. The proposed project comports with the Cave
Spring Community Planning guidelines set forth under the Plan by providing a service oriented
facility designed to assist area residents needing short -term rehabilitation, all in a family - friendly
environment. The facility will be constructed in a campus -like setting with open gardens,
courtyards and walking paths in the interior to allow free movement by residents without
disturbing neighboring properties. It will also offer separate activity and dining areas. The
project will retain natural vegetation to the extent feasible and use extensive landscaping to
provide sufficient buffers. The facility will address a major need for this area of the county by
providing convenient access to short -term rehabilitation and other health related services for a
large segment of the county's population. The proposed use of the property is consistent with
the recommendations for the transition use category of the Plan in which category approximately
one -half of the property lies and will generate 50 to 55 jobs for the region.
C. Impact on Neighborhood. Traffic impact will be minimal due to the timing of
the staff shifts (7 to 3, 3 to 11 and 11 to 7 which do not correlate with the normal traffic patterns
� p
for morning and afternoon commutes. Lighting will be muted and in conformity with the Plan's
guidelines. Parking, loading and unloading will be located at the rear of the facility. The facility
will be constructed primarily within the transition area of the property which will help preserve
and incorporate the natural site resources into its design. The rear and side property lines will be
buffered to provide extensive privacy as well as security. The rear portion of the property, which
is located in the neighborhood conservation use category of the Plan, will, for the most part, be
left undisturbed. The facility will offer physical, occupational and speech therapy services for
the community's residents. No outpatient therapy services will be offered in the near future.
Noise impact will be minimal since most patients will be transported to the facility from Lewis
Gale Hospital and Roanoke Memorial Hospital following their surgical procedures. Nursing
staff will be onsite 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Further, with the 120 patients, family, visitors
and employees, the development will have a significant positive impact on the region's small
businesses in the area, including, but not limited to, shopping, restaurant and dining, banking,
etc.
Water and sewer is available for the project, and it has sufficient access to public roads.
The impact of the project on the surrounding area will be minimal since the area is comprised of
a multitude of different zoning districts within a relatively short distance from the subject
property.
The applicant's proposal provides an opportunity to: (i) procure a multi - million dollar
project which will serve the county for the foreseeable future; (ii) significantly enhance the value
of the property and surrounding parcels; (iii) help generate further capital improvements in this
area of the county; (iv) fulfill a major need for county residents; and (v) provide a more
convenient location for short term rehab services and eliminate the need for older county
residents to commute along the I -5 81 corridor.
UAA CLIENT STriendship Health and Rehab Center South, Inc 43041Attachnient Number i to Zoning Application.docx
ATTACHMENT NUMBER 2 TO
APPLICATION OF FRIENDSHIP HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER SOUTH, INC. AND
FRIENDSHIP HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER, INC.
1*1:1:1 beaY1�►�
LIST of EXHIBITS
ITEM
A
Concept Plan
B
Metes and Bounds Description
C
water and Sewer Services
D
Adjoining Property Owners
E
Adjoining Property Zoning
F
Flood Determination
G
Aerial Site Photo
H
Sample Project Exterior view
I
Topography Map
J
Support Letters
K
AEP Easement
L
Revised Concept Plan Incorporating Future
Expansion Area
UAA CLIENTSWalley Management Co., Inc. 37511 -05 Acquisition of Share 2 Trust Property\Attachment Number 2 to Zoning Application.docx
ATTACHMENT NUMBER 3 TO
APPLICATION OF FRIENDSHIP HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER SOUTH, INC. AND
FRIENDSHIP HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER, INC.
A. Potential Development of Future Expansion Area In the event a need arises for
independent and/or assisted living residential units, Applicant wants the option to build single
family cottage homes or similar residential facilities in the area captioned "Future Expansion" on
the initial Concept Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A. Any such development would be
residential in character, in keeping with the neighborhood designation for this part of the
property, and similar in concept to the duplex cottages shown on the Revised Concept Plan
attached hereto as Exhibit L. There would be approximately 8 to 10 such units available for
lease to residents, each containing approximately 1,350 square feet including an attached garage.
Applicant anticipates the units will be built brie to grade with vinyl siding. This phase of the
project would constitute an adult care facility as defined in the Roanoke County Code ("Code").
Any such development would comport with all Code requirements including lighting, buffering
and set -back requirements.
UAA CLIENTSIValley Management Co., Inc. 37541 -06 Acquisition of Share 2 Trust Property\Attachment Number 3 to Zoning Application.docx
D vs -0 -�c w E - cy
W
Q.Q �dmm r sV
W N 42. t4 II r
t;t
CC
W
n }
in
w a
F O n u w = !lJ W
_ 4 o w w 3 J>
O to v>
Z d Cp7 t Y i q w z v� E C Z
�- a. u C m V v U o 4 c X O N Q
W
o a
cm U) 0.
co r
U) _
CL CL
CL
CN CL
r
CD N M CL
Lp CL
.0 rZ 1 �
r
I * '
- _
CM CL
_ T fn
cv cm
�a
C"7 op " - - J
M ° _
•
�, 11
a
Q 4� i t° C mac r ^
i'!'y j' ~'I
' t
I r CN
M' I fti9 CL
IN
- 4!7
Cti! N
CL
CN
CL
woo
00
a
.y
5 1
1 }
- A -
- � t
1
L�
W �{�
EXHIBIT B
Metes and Bounds Description
All that certain lot or parcel of land, with all the appurtenances thereunto belonging, lying and
being in the County of Roanoke , State of Virginia, and more particularly described as follows,
to -wit:
BEGINNING at a point in the Roanoke - Starkey Road, now Virginia State Route #901, at the
Northeast corner of the Central Baptist Church parsonage lot; thence with the Northern line of
said parsonage lot, N. 66° 10' W. 282 feet to the Northwest corner thereof, and the corner to
the land heretofore sold by Good to J. B. Ferguson; thence with the line of the latter, N. 82 W.
655.8 feet to a point in the center of Crescent Heights Boulevard; thence with the center thereof,
N. 11 30' W. 209.6 feet to a point, corner to the land of W. H. Mason; thence leaving said
Boulevard and with the line of said Mason, N. 79 10' E. 391 feet to a point at another corner
of the said Mason Land, sold to him by said Good by deed dated November 1, 1921 - thence
with the line of said Mason, N. 25 41' E. 674.7 feet, more or less, to a point in the center of
Arthur Street; thence S. 63 15' E. 40 feet to a point in same; thence leaving Arthur Street, S.
24 45' W. 352 feet to a point, corner to the land formerly owned by C. L. Arthur; thence with
the line of the latter, S . �3 ° 15' E. 5 �.4 feet to a po int in the Roanoke-Starkey Road; thence with
same, S. 24 45'W. 472 feet to the place of BEGINNING, containing 10.56 acres.
THERE IS EXCEPTED from the above - described property a small strip or parcel thereof
conveyed unto the Commonwealth of Virginia by deed dated August 30, 1933, of record in the
Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, in Deed Book 220,
page 593.
EXHIBIT C
Water and Sever Service
W E S T E R N V! R G I N 1 A
WATER AUTHORITY
Engineering
Services
Availability # 12 -284 September 24, 2012
Address: 5647 Starkey Rd Accounting Code:
`fax Map Number(s): 087.18-01-37.00-0000 Roanoke County
Contact: Violet Lane (540) 777 -7580
Prepared by: David Vo elson , P.E., Engineer II (540) 853 -5688
This letter has.been generated without an approved plan.
- -: Based ont the information "that' has been provided to ''the western Virginia - water Authority, it ' has' been
determined that public water and sewer can be made available to this proposed parcel. water or sewer
services are required for this parcel and all costs associated with the services will be the responsibility of the
- own erldeve lope r. After the plan has been submitted, a more detailed letter outlining specific fees associated
-with connecting to water and sewer systems will be provided.
WATER:
The hydraulic grade line of the existing 12 -inch public waterline in Starkey Road is 1423 feet. It is the
owner/developers responsibility to ensure that the existing water system can provide the necessary flow and
pressure required for the proposed development on this parcel.
SEWER:
An 8 -inch public sanitary sewer_ is. located in Rockbridge Court. It would take 'an extension of approximately
130 feet of 8 -inch public sanitary sewer from Manhole 02A- 3797.0 to reach this property, It is the
ownerld eve lope rs responsibility to determine if the existing public sewer can provide service to the proposed
development on this parcel.
Notes:
■ All work performed will be in accordance with the approved plans. Any inspections required by the WVWA
will reed to be coordinated with Mark Sink 540- 537 -3673. All taps must be scheduled at least 48 hours in
advance.
■ For any fire vaults, please contact Clearflow at 540- 434 -2130. Vault details must be submitted to the WVWA
for approval prior to construction.
It is the developer's responsibility to apply for all required permits under the local building code and to
confirm there is a minimum of three feet of fall from the lowest floor served to the top of the sewer main. If
not, a private pumping station will be required.
■ The Developer is responsible for constructing all services from the main to the building.
Our Mission is Clear
601 South Jefferson Street * Suite 300 ■ Roanoke VA 24011
540 -853 -1017 (fax) • www.weSternvawater.org
Fax Server 9/20/2012 1:57;42 FM FADE 2/002 Fax Server
r kJV E. 5 T E is N 1 R G 1 12 6 A
J T H OR' I
INA: 1 E R A fu
S eptember 20, 2012
Violet Lane
Ms, Lane:
In response to your Inquiry we de provide water service at 5647 Starker Rd,, if you lave
any further que�stlons feel free to call us,
Thank you,
John Fishman
Customer Service Representative
Western Virginia Water Authority
601 S. Jefferson $t
Roanoke, VA 24011 -2400
Ph one: (5 8 63-6700
Fax: (540) 8 63 - 5703
EXHIBIT D
Adjoining Property owners
....... . . . . . . . . .
....... . ..
. ....... ..
. a I
. .. . ... ... ....
r
.... .. .....
...........
All.
LCO
A
XN
Ail
..li
x.
-41 n
LU
......... . ..
bLO
.....
.. ...
.... ......
........ ..
----- -----
. .. . ... ... ....
r
.... .. .....
...........
All.
LCO
A
XN
Ail
..li
x.
-41 n
LU
......... . ..
. .. . ... ... ....
r
.... .. .....
...........
All.
LCO
A
XN
Ail
..li
x.
-41 n
.
- .......... n .
.................. . a
mac; ..::...........:.
_ _.:
- - - f
_ C
3 n _
-rte` .in
__ _
irY.'•
. - �.:.
•.eta^'
Ln
cn
00
CO 0 0
M0 0
DO
00
.My0
.My0
MM
cc
M 00
w
00 .
cc
00
M 00
M 00
00
C]
r-I
r-I r-I
ti--I
C]
0 C]
C]
0
0
0
C]
G
C]
0
0
C] C]
C]
C]
C3
0 CD
0 CD
CD
0
0
0
N
rN rN
N
rN
N
N
N
N
N
N
rV N
rN
N
N
rV rV
N N
N
rV
N
N
QJ
Q) ❑
iv
Q)
Q.7
Q)
❑
W
W
W
❑
W ❑
W
❑
❑
Q} ❑
0� Ql
Q.7
Q3
❑
Q}
>
❑
❑ ❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
o
❑
o
o ❑
o
o
o
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑
Q
❑
❑
0
m
ru ru
m
m
m
ru
ru
m
ra
ro
m
ru m
tz
ru
m
M M
M M
M
M
M
M
0
o
o ❑
o
o
o
o ❑❑
o
o
o o
o
o
o
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Of
�
a
t _
a
a
ry
F;
°C
u
0
>
>
V
V)
o
>
0
0
0
0 0❑
o
a
a
o
V)
V) V)
z
V)
`
u
u
a
Z
a
0
0 m
m
m
m
m m
m m
m
m
m
"'
F;
en V)
V
p
,--
z
aC
o� o�
V)
c�
Q
—
Q
—
y
y z
z
z
z
z z
z z
z
z
z
cr
_,
O O
LU
w
m
z
z
w
w
w
w w
w
w
w
w w
u w
w
w
w
LU
m
z Q
u
Q
z
Q
Q
Q
LnLu
0000,-
w��
-�����
a)
Q
Q Q
ct•
u
u
V)
co
V)
V)
V) u
u
u
u
u u
u u
u
u
u
Q
m
CT)
C] co
en
m
N
C]
0
1 ,0
tD
Ln
CT)
CT) CD
r-i
m
r-f
00 04
Do Do
Do
00
Do
-It
rn
. -i
�
Ln
� m
Ln Ln
co
�
Lo
C]
Lo
�
to
�
to
Lrs
C,o
0
N
tD
�.o
tD
Co
�,O N
�.o r-
r
0
W
k-D klo
k-D k-D
L.0 klo
Lo Lo
klo
Lo
klo
to
L.0
to
L.0
Ln
Q —i
Ln
Ln Ln
r•
Lo
Ln
m
m
Ln
oo
Ln
Ln
Ln Ln
Ln
Ln
u)
Ln Ln
Ln Ln
Ln
Lo
Ln
Ln
V)
oC
w I�-
uU
w
F-
LL-
V)
of
Q o
z
Q
m z
_
CL
Q
o
0
06
z
z
z
°
z
-
z
--�
o
z
z
o
u
Q Q
m
w
`n
oC
oC
o=
V)
V)
Z
u
u u
u
u
u
u
... . ... .... ... .
z z
a
d
Q
z
m
m w
uj
a
Q
d Q
d
d
Q
Q
Q
u u
u_ =
w
o
o
o
z
w
w w
w
w
w
w
en
u
u
u
u
u
u Q
Q
Q
o
m 0 —1
u
w
-
�c
u
z
-
z
o
E
ra
m
Q
�������
z
°;,�
F -
u
o
z
o
V)
V) w
V)
E
w
_
w w
_ =
w
=
w
=
w
=
w
=
LL V)
�
�
�
�
�
LL;
w
Q
z
z
z �
a
<
� �
o= o=
oa
���zw
ZLLJLU
oo
o °C
LLI
�ww�,w�,�,w
=
w
o w
a
o
Q
Q
z¢
o
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
m
co co
m
m
m
co
C]
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
CD 0
0 CD
CD
0
0
0
C]
C]
0 0
o
C]
C]
C]
CD
0
0
C]
CD
CD 0
0
0
0
CD CD
0 0
0
CD
0
CD
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
C) 0
0 C]
C)
C3
C3
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
CD 0
CD CD
0
0
0
0
C]
C]
0 0
rN4
r
C]
0
0
C]
C]
C]
0
0 0
CD
C]
C]
CD
0 CD
CD
O
CD
0
___ 0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
= o
�i
o0
of
r=
co
vo
c�i
re)
to
u i
Ln k-D
r=
00
of
r-A
J
0 r i
C]
m M
M
M
C]
r1
0
M
M
M
M
Ln Ln
rl
r--1
rl
r-A r-A
N N
N
N
N
re)
-
r-i
r
!
r-I r-I
r
re
F
rti']
l
C]
{
C]
!
C)
t
re
!
rti']
!
t--i
}
r-I
i f
r1 r-I
N
N
N
t
r-I r1
t F
r1 r1
1
r1
i
rl
t
r-I
i
r-I
�'
CL C]
0
0 0
0
0
r+
r
r
C]
0
0
0
C] C]
C)
0
C3
O CD
CD CD
0
C3
C)
C3
,
aQ
04
04 W
Q)
cri
cn
(n
(n
cri
Q)
04
04
04 aQ
CA
aQ
00
04 W
aQ aQ
04
04
00
aQ
aC r�
r�
r• r•
r�
r•
r•
r•
r•
r•
r�
r•
r•
r• r•
r•
r•
r•
r• r•
r• r•
r•
r•
r•
r•
> '_'.
00
00
co 0o
Co
Co
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
00
00
w
00 w
w
w
00
00 00
00 w
w
w
00
w
0
C]
C] C]
0
0
0
C]
C]
C]
0
0
C]
C) C]
C)
C3
C3
CD CD
0 0
0
0
CD
G
a
z
N
m
r•
oo
CT)
r'
N
m
�n
r•
oo
m CD
ri r,t
m
Ln
�
J
u
M
r1
r-I
r-i
ri
r-I r1
r-I
r-I
r-I
r-I N
N N
N
cad
N
N
i�
EXHIBIT E
Adjoining Property Zoning
EXHIBIT F
Flood Determination
Contact Name: Karen Sherman
STANDARD FLOOD HAZARD Contact Plione: 744 - 365 -6213
DETERMINATION Contact Email: k
Contact Fax: 704 - 365 -6214
SECTION 1- LOAN INFORMATION
]. LENDER NAME AND ADDRESS
REQUESTER:
3. LENDER ID. NO
2. COLLATERAL( Brrite lir)glMohileHoitrelPetsoiieiI Property)
PROPERTY ADDRESS (Legal Description nia) be attache(l)
Ceriified A ddress.
Friendship Retirement,
564' Starkey Rd
Roanoke VA 24018-9034
4, LOAN IDENTIFIER 5. AMOUNT OF FLOOD INSURANCE REQUIRED
SECTION 11
A. NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM (N171P) COMMUNITY 3URISDICTION
1. NFIP
Community 2.•County(ies) 3 ' 4. NFIP Community Number
Name Stale
ROANOKE UNINCORPORATED VA 510190
COUNTY AREAS
B. NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM (NFIP) DATA AFFECTING BUILDING/MOBILE HOME
I. NFIP Map Number or Community- 2. NFIP Map Panel 3. LOMAILOMR d. Flood Zone 5, No NFIP Map
Panel Number Effective/
(Community name, if not the same as Revised Date
>
510190 - 0253 -0 09 -28-2007 Yes: 08-18-2009 x No
C. FEDERAL FLOOD INSUP.ANCE AVAILABILITY (Check all Thai app1j)
(X) Federal Flood insurance is available (community participates in NFIP). (X) Regular Program ( ) Emergency Program of NFIP
( ) Federal Flood Insurance is not available because the community is not participating in the NFIP
( ) Building/Mobile Home is in a Coastal Barrier Resource Area(CBRA) or Otheri►ise Protected Area(OPA), Federal Flood Insurance
may not be available
CBRA1OPA Designation date:
D. DETERMINATION
IS BUILDING /MOBILE HOME IN SPECIAL .FLOOD HAZARD AREA
(ZONES BEGINNING WITH LETTER "All OR "Vlf) ? [ I YES J ] N O
If yes, flood insti rune e is regiiired by the Flood Distaster Protection Act of 1X773.
If no, flood insurance is not required by the: Flood Disaster Protcction Act of 1973.
E. COMMENTS: This Mood determination is provided solely for the use and benefit of the entity named in Section I, Bo-% I in order to comply with the
1994 Reform Act and may not be used for or relied upon by any other entity or individual for any purpose, including, but not limited to deciding whether to
purchase a property or determining the value of a Property. 7793205
Determination No. Borro - %ver: Friendship Retirement, MSA: 40220 State /County Code: 51 -0190
COI 1249676549 Reg. Pgm. Entry: 10 -11 -1973 Parcel No:
BFE: Legal Description:
BFD.-
Det Ref lD; 11287847
This determination is based on exainining the NFIP map, and any FederaI Management Agency revisions to it, and any other information needed to Inctate The
building mobile home on [lie NFIP iuup,
F. PREPARER'S INFORMATION
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE NUMBER DATE OF DETERMINATION
CvreLogic Flood Services
11902 Burnet Road 09-20-2012
Austin, TIC 78758
G. PRIOR COMMUNITY INFORMATION
liquifies;
Revised Date
No 800-371-0061
a PROPERTY ADDRESS.:
5TDB(!) N LI N E.00M 5647+ Starkey +Rd %2C +Roanoke %2C +VA %2C +24018
F LOM
WURCEI''
FLOODSCAP
f(� .•
�o
20NE AE
dR
Nod
l v
W.
'ack Creek Tributary & �
3 909 1
Ro anoke Cou
Unincorporated Areas
510190
FLOODSCAPETM
Fbod Haw ds Map
k Map Humber
51 101 CO253G
Effective Date
September 28, 2007
Flood Legend
High flood risk
Moderate flood risk
Low flood risk
This report makes no
representations or warranties
concerning its content, accuracy
or completeness.
STDBonlinexom
469.574. 1234
Powered by F[aadSource
8TI.77.FL04D
r 9 www.floodsource,com
1999 -2012 SourceProse Corporation. All rights reserved. Protected by U.S. Patent Numbers 6631326, 6678615, 6842698, and 7038681.
FEMA Map Service Center - FEMA Flood Zone Designations Page 1 of 2
Product Catalog ]Flap Search I Q uick Order I Digital Post O ffice I H elp
Home > FEMA %20Ftood%20Zone %20aesignations
Definitions of FEMA Flood Zone Designations
Flood zones are geographic ar that the FEMA has defined according to varying levels of flood risk. These zones are depicted on a
community's Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) or Flood Hazard Boundary Map. Each zone reflects the severity or type of flooding in the
area.
Moderate to Low Risk Areas
In communities that participate in the NFIP, flood insurance is available to all property owners and renters in these zones:
ZONE
DESCRIPTION
Area of moderate flood hazard, usually the area between the limits of the 100 -year and 500 -year floods. Are also
B and X (shaded)
used to designate base floodplains of lesser hazards, such as areas protected by levees from 100 -year flood, or
shallow flooding areas with average depths of less than one foot or drainage areas less than I square mile.
+C and X (unshaded)
Area of minimal flood hazard, usually depicted on FIRMS as above the 500 -year flood level.
High Risk Areas
In communities that participate in the NFIP, mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements apply to all of these zones:
ZONE
DESCRIPTION
Areas with a i % annual chance of flooding and a 26% chance of flooding over the life of a 30 year mortgage.
A
Because detailed analyses are not performed for such areas; no depths or base flood elevations are shown
within these zones.
AE
The base floodplain where base flood elevations are provided. AE Zones are now used on new format FIRMS
Instead of AZ -A30 Zones.
Al-30
These are known as numbered A Zones (e.g., A7 or A14). This is the base floodplain where the FIRM! shows a
BFE (old format).
Areas with a I annual chance of shallow flooding, usually In the form of a pond, with an average depth ranging
AH
from i to 3 feet. These areas have a 26 chance of flooding over the life of a 30 -year mortgage. Base flood
elevations derived from detailed analyses are shown at selected intervals within these zones.
River or stream flood hazard areas, and areas with a 1 % or greater chance of shallow flooding each year, usually
AO
in the form of sheet flow, with an average depth ranging from I to 3 feet. These areas have a 26% chance of
flooding over the life of a 30-year mortgage. Average flood depths derived from detailed analyses are shown
within these zones.
Areas with a temporarily increased flood risk due to the building or restoration of a flood control system (such as
AR
a levee or a dam). Mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements will apply, but rates will not exceed the
rates for unnumbered A zones if the structure is built or restored in compliance with Zone AR floodplain
management regulations.
Areas with a 1 % annual chance of flooding that will be protected by a Federal flood control system where
A99
construcfion has reached specified legal requirements. No depths or base flood elevations are shown within
these zones.
High Risk - Coastal Areas
i
I
I
i
https: / /msc.fema.gov /�ebapp /wcs /stores /servietlinfa�storeld =10001 &catalogld =1 0001 la... 9/20/2012
FEMA Map Service Center - FEMA Flood Zone Des2gnatiot:is
Page 2 of 2
ZONE
DESCRIPTION
Coastal areas with a I % or a neater chance of hooding and an additional hazard associated with storm waves,
V
These areas have a 26% chance of flooding over the life of a 30-year mortgage. No base flood elevations are
shown within these zones.
Coastal areas with a I% or greater chance of flooding and an additional hazard associated with storm waves.
VE, V1 » 30
These areas have a 26% chance of flooding over the life of a 30 -year mortgage. Base flood elevations derived
from detailed analyses are shown at selected intervals within these zones.
Undetermined Risk Areas
ZONE
DESCRIPTION
Areas with possible but undetermined flood hazards. No flood hazard analysis has been conducted. Flood
insurance rates are commensurate with the uncertainty of the flood risk.
FEMA.gev I Accessibility I Privacy Policy I FAQ ] Site Help I Site Index ! Contact, us
. ..................... -
FEMA Map Service Center, P.O. Box 3617 Caxton, Virginia 22124 -9617 Phone. (877) 338 -2627
Adobe Acrobat Reader required to view certain documents. Click here to download.
https: llmse. fema. govlwebapplwcslstoreslservletlinfo?storeld =10001 eatalogId =1OOOl Ia... 9/20/2012
Intranetix Viewer [51161CO253G,tifl
.................. ..........
.............. ...
......:.:....... ..........
..
f"
. .
T` jj N
.�i
......... ......:
_ y
.�
„�.. ..f c
.—r
.3j _
;! L
•T ..' �r. `��f FI':4f�f c f'. �F`f f - ,��Fr `:
_ fj-_n�
iara'?
Page 1 of 1
Scale:
: "O
�O 09 - 0 3 - 1568P-51019 0
i
http.// mapI. mrse .fema.gov /idms/IntraView ?ROB` =a& X= 7079&0 Y= 5125 &0 ZM... 9/1 812012
EXHIBIT G
Aerial Site Photo
Llvq��
w
EXHIBIT H
Sample Project Exterior View
K
. .. .... ...
EXHIBIT I
Topography Map
i f ul
ff , :' :'• :. t !',,- '�.i�_f' -.. � LO
op
It
"[. r `� i � ' . •r� � -' \� • 1 0 1 � : k ^ �. » �I T .r _ r { 1
111'{ I ' •r ` \• a • ., t r' � +ti �•!� •, F'' r oob
ci ?! i t , ' 1'�• r�• f ei : �r' `••� - � • `►� O 4 .i r
1p
P.
? *`:e ti's �r j •� • - 'mi l = r
��„ ' - � r ' :•� •` 't ` `y It a;lltrr r`r t i ,1= / 1 f
tee~+e,� �r'��~" ~� - '•:.� ? i t = sl t i i 'i : i f , �. —y '` -s 1
�- �' C $ • 1.� J ,,.r -`*t. � = �� • �.� - . 1 • + � �r,� t
�. }}ry `te � y =!. ` \ �.. �r _ �: = i ' i \ �• �•...
• b f , L \� - 1 ! = f : t`. J ^l : _ '. . • � , -.� •r l •`` • Z i _ - 1 1. ti • . ° ` • .... -^ _ • . , � � 1 t ��w
? JJ _ {J •_ . • ` `, .; \ .t yam• . • : f =_ ! - a i +
•, :S s t '� J'• �� ~,' `, •i : ,•�• � ••` '•�\ �t� 4���s ,�' er r _ ,r-•- ••� • •. r • _ 't • �� I � i `.
/••- �ii� � •a \ i S -� •- ' 1 � � Lti �a ~•`• � . .. .-. .J -•_, � • a i •� •! • i f
��� � { � f ` 'x •t •a ask. ��.�.� ��� � 0 1w.. -.. r... �.•�'sr'r - •` \ i. � •i ` i ; ��• 1 i
v rr � �' f+ �i �' i ~ �'r 'r •" •Y .. r ..r �. ! • j r ti � • ': r i
� �r1�r 14�t �'., � r x +)� �`' f .` +..«.�•• �' l :�F t _'; t =•
• � . = y / •�4, 3 �� � , �ti T�•\ ` �L r t. 1�,.� .� � ��. -,..» � ~ ~ - y '} i a ••` •� ,� i i � • J i
....... ` .�. �f'l /���� y 1 r �Q, � � � 1``t � � ti " ""a r� J L 't ', • • �1 � r
_~ 1 � � .�•- }• i *� �•t •' •'.k � ` � 1 ` r �• -`� �'� `�`� �- .- � -.-�.. .r - - -- _. , : •� k � i � � ' ' _ L t t r r
jr i '1 \'.i`.., t•aa, j \� • ^ y,� ..` - •`....' r• - i r ` i i 3 1 3 i
If
� s _
{ � ^.. � � r•^- 'r���j '` "7� � `' ��` 1 � 1 � � � ? �+�'la�' ' ' � i } i t { � � � i � .f ' i 3 i i
' � �a r � '''~ -•... — t � J � } � 1 � � ! � i - ^- «.�..... i i }_ � t � � � � l i p ; t =. i %�
�'•`. r f ! J � �� �' �,', � { •�.. f i i L i . FF , ..�� / ?•'S� � --.1•' �'" i F • t `
• � '• � �_ •� •' � ' ' .f r' �Y , \ i r � � � i i y _,.rte .r ,: j : L ' ��F
� '' � i , �t r j # � � �` '. .? �' •ia � �
1- e �j4�•�ra � f� � f f•� ' � t � 1 � � 1 � � � "t ,•'� i + � i � � ,: �• i _ �f • r�ry r r• °•ter•+ i � . i -, i � 1 •a +
r...r ,��, /� � • f �! 4 t i ti � \ f � > �" ` i f a yV"�. r•' + '.'.�'� l _ , •� = L [ r
' ` I ���• r . J sr r
! 7 L `��/�f, 1 1 7 i f f F I t L ; { 7 j
r r � � f � L `� t! ' ,' \, y` .` � rr f f �/• f` r � j F ! � f 7 r.. _ ».,.. -r ^��� i J� i : i . � � ����
T f C i� � � ��t ti r .,� } .� ! r � f � f F r•• r J'� �' � ti T.�.�. / !,� %f "r!f ..
f -� Sti �'ti 'SIN f, r ! �..•- �:_� ��.
�,..- ^•.+--- ..r.- ---' -� • � i } i 7 ti •� i�...4,,.� � ! f • f r � � j • 7 { r r � �... -+r }': + S
{ 1 t
� �.,.,,� r+.. -� � � t � . � �� Jar � r - �� � � �, - �� :` It
N
yt j (y`JfJ --�k
. r
a � s , � •� � f � l
l -; i t �� ``•�.. 1 1 r rt• (fir ` I
., f }jt p a i`` \L4 p• ti •a., '�'a•^- "'�+...rf'`� -. -y �'�r...•��` `'+.`����'f r i' _[ 't ' f ! [�i
gel
Q C
X CD
cu
EXHIBIT J
Support Letters
September 19, 2012
The Honorable Karen 0. Remley, M.D., M.B.A.
Commissioner
Department of Health
c/o Peter Boswell, Acting Director
Division of Certificate of Public feed
9900 Mayland Drive, Suite 401
Richmond, VA 23233
Dear Karen,
I am writing to express my support for Friendship Health and Rehabilitation Center's
certificate of public need to create a 120 bed, state -of -the -art long term care facility on
Starkey Read in Roanoke, Virginia.
More than 700 carilion patients chose Friendship each year for their short term
rehabilitation, skilled or long term placement. Friendship has actively worked to
maintain and improve patient health and to reduce readmission rates, working closely
with physicians and surgeons in our community. Our patients will also benefit from
Friendship's investment in electronic medical record systems that allow our physicians
to follow patients' progression from their offices. A number of our physicians are
involved in the care of patients at Friendship; in fact, two of them are medical directors
and oversee the care.
Friendship is an important provider of services in our region, and as a non - profit
organization accepts patients regardless of their ability to pay. Its proposed new facility
will provide clinically enhanced care with easier accessibility for our patients.
Thank you for your consideration of this request to approve Friendship's COPN.
Warmly,
Nancy Howell Agee
President and CEO
Nancy Howell Agee, President and CEO
P.O. Box 13727 Roanoke, VA 24036 -3727 Phone: 540- 981 -8844 Fax: 544 -981 -7670 nhagee @carilionclinic.org
Anthony R. Stavola, MD
Clifford A. Nottingham, MD
Todd S. Palmerton, MD
Vivien 1. Dsuorah, MD
William K. Harris, MD
Christian Klaus, Da
Deborah B. Robinson, FNP, MSN
Nancy S. Harvey, FNP, M5N
Julie S. LaGault, FNP, M5N
September 11, 2012
To Whom It May Concern:
I write in support of Friendship Health and Rehabilitation Center's COPN application for
development of a 120-bed facility in south Roanoke County.
As an admitting physician to Friendship's current facility on Hershberger load for more
than 30 years, I have seen this entity grow dynamically to meet the community's needs.
Friendship is currently providing state of the art therapies as parts of short and long term
rehabilitation modalities. Its nurses and ancillary staff treat a multitude of infections,
manage complicated wounds and skin issues, provide access to dialysis and other
complicated patient care needs in addition to offering palliative care support. All the
while, it accepts patients from across diverse social and economic sectors — many of
whom have extremely limited sources of funding.
Friendship also is proactively pursuing quality initiatives in the realm of clinical
pharmacy, electronic health records, and care plan oversight. Efforts are being
coordinated with other - health care entities to reduce hospital readmissions, rates of
infections, and overall morbidity and mortality.
To these ends, Friendship needs to continue upgrading its facilities. The project
addressed by this COPN would provide more private rooms as well as opportunities for
high tech monitoring and enhanced rehabilitation equipment and strategies.
I encourage and request your support for this needed asset for our valley.
Since f rely yours,
Clifford A. Nottingham, M.D.
Family Medicine
6415 Peters Creek Road Roa poke, VA 240 19 -402 1 Phone: 540 -265 -5500 Fax: 540 -265 -5515
Anthony R. Stavo la, MD
Clifford A. Nottingham, MD
Todd S. Palmerton, WID
Vivien 1. Dsuorah, MD
William K. Harris, MD
C Klaus, Do
Deborah B. Robinson, FNP, MSN
Nancy S. Harvey, FNR MSN
Julie S. LaGault, FNP, MSN
rt of the COPN for Friendship Health and Rehabilitation I am writing in supp Center in
Roanoke. This would
allow them to take 120 beds out of the existing facility to develop
a new 120 bed state -of -the -art long - term care facility with private rooms.
'
As a physician with a large nursin g home practice I can attest to the increasing issues
increasing associated with infections that are facility acquired and the incre g need to p rovide
i is to minimize facility acquired infections and readmissions to the
private grooms for patients �'
hospital.
• ver p ro active in working to decrease the incidence of infections
Friendship has been ry P
an reduce readmission rates. They provide a high level of service inc luding on -site
. tine services from. several specialty disciplines. In addition there is a
dialysis axial consults of harxnac
h am on site that is actively wor�ing to reduce p yp y
very st rong pharmacy P ro
• medic use. The have excellent physical occupational and speech
and to monitor meth ca y
therapy p rograms ams and accept high complexity patients and are also nonprofit and
p rovide services for indigent and Medicaid patients as well.
F or these reasons and others I hope this c0PN will be approved.
sincerel
Anthony R Stavola MD
Family Medicine
6415 Peters Creek Road Roanoke, WA 2401 9-4021 Phone: 540 -265 -5500 Fax-.
Preston A. Waldrop, MD
Sports Mcdicinc & Genn•al QrthopaCdisr, ABQS, AAOS
Mark L. Hagy, MIS
Four, AnNc, KnccSpcciaikt & Gcncra ? Qrrhopaedis� ABOS, AAQS, AAFAGS
. William E. Hooper, MD
Hand Spcda)W & Gcncral orthopaedist ABOS,AAOS
Gregory D. Rii�bel, MD
Minimally involve Spine SpcdaIisr &Gcneral orthopaedist, A BaS, A.AQS
A _,
I •f Y ��
=A= VIRG iA. y__�r
,- ORTHQPA.EDIC
C atherine D am el M D
R =matology,ABIK FACR
R. Michael Wilson, PA -C
AA PA, VA PA
Rob Powers, PA -C
AAPA, VAP, Ar C
Laura Hood, PA -C
AAPA,
Lynn S. Gilbert, PA -C
AA PA. VAPA
September 11, 2012
Mr. Russ Barksdale Jr.
President/CEO Friendship Retixement Co
367 Hershb erg er Road
Roanoke, ETA 2 4012
Dear Mr. Barksdale:
I understand that Friendship Health and Rehab Center is interested M building a
new 120 bed inpatient rehab facility on Starkey Road. As a busy orthopedist who does
quite a number of total joints, I certainly understand the benefits of inpatient rehab
facilities, especially in postoperative care of patient's I treat on a routine basis. I do feel
that getting the patient's out of the hospital as quickly as possible, into more private
accommodations certainly helps with reducing hospital acquired infections. I also feel
that inpatient facilities can improve inpatients health and reduce readmission rates post
surgically. I also know that the area of Starkey Road in southwest county is very much
underserved for inpatient rehab.
For all the above reasons, I do support the application for certificate of public
need. If there are any questions concerning my thoughts, please feel free to contact me,
Sincerely,
Pres on A. W drop, M. .
PAW/bth .. ..
Virg orthopaedic, P.C. e 301 KMotbreak Road - e Salim, VA 24153 * Phone (540) 444 -4020 0 FAX (540) 444 - 4021
September 26, 2012
To Whom It May Concern:
I am writing in support of Friendship Health and Rehab Center's Certificate of Public Need
application to develop a 120-bed skilled nursing facility in south Roanoke County.
Friendship Health and Rehab Center already operates a successful 300-bed unit in north
Roanoke. This expansion will be a major benefit to my district as it will provide enhanced local
healthcare access and skilled nursing and rehabilitation services for people who live or work in
and around south Roanoke County.
As someone who works in the field of senior care, I know all too well the demand for these
services.
This project also is expected to create several new jobs in such fields as nursing and physical and
occupational therapy in addition to the jobs needed to design and construct the facility.
The proposed development of this proposed facility is a logical and timely extension of the
healthcare services that Friendship Health and Rehab Center and its medical staff have offered
over the years. Friendship is widely recognized for its programs, services and commitment to
improving the healthcare of its local and regional community. Now, further development and
modernization is a crucial component to patients in need of receiving skilled nursing facility
services.
Please convey my support for this project to the Certificate of Public Need Division at the
Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Health Office.
S incerely,
Christopher T. Head
EXHIBIT K
AEP Easement
iR �► �� al y a a C3 m1p M� w
County of Roanoke to -wits
1, Ma rie R. Casey, a Notary Public i and for r the county and at a foftro sat
do certify that Ho We Turner, President, -and D C. Brown, Assi t Secretary,
respectively, of Dixi P mace & Loa Corporation whose e s are signed to the
foregoing writing, bearing date . o f -the 7th day of ]day 940 have each a olmowlsdg
the same before me in my County and State a fore sai a the act and dead of thi
Cmrporat
My co=idsadon expires Jamary 28, 19 �
C�iv en under try hand And official al this 7th day of Ray, 1940 .
Hari a .g. Casey, Notary Publia
Seal of
Mari N. Casey, rotary Publi
R,oanok T a
Mm the Clark's Of ce of the Circuit Court for the County of Roan�ake, Va.
thi 20 day of Marc 1941, this ea sement wa presented, and with the Certificat
of aclriowledge�a�t ereto annexed, armftted t record at; av a A* M e
Tax 0 12 Teste
Fee 1 ■50
. Roy K. Brown,, C1 erk
A 0 0 k-. - C;Z / lk
r
THIS INDRNTURR, Made this, 216th day of February, 1940, by and between Ce C■
Moser and Ruby Hurt Moser, his wife., and Margaret H Moser ( ed) and Wilson,
Moser and Audrey M. Moser, his wife, of the County of Roanoke, in the Mate of
Virginia, parties of the first part and Appalachian Meotric Powe Coe , a corpor-
ation organized and existing under the laws of the Stat of Virginia, party of
the second part,
W3E8U# That for and In consideration of the sum of one and no/1
Dollars, and other valuable oonalderation in hand paid to the parties of the firs
part by the party of the second apart, the receipt of uhf ch to hereby acknowledged
said parties of the first part hereby grant, bargain, sell, convey, and warrant
to the party of the second part, its auecessors and assi gna a right of w4 and
I we
s x., � _�i& i Z c yi
L! V i 4y1a V A,"W v V Yd—&"w , M V i v Q+Q `aA v r•C►+JP .. r .. r � � w ► „. ,.. .,� ,. r — r out and at its nptl on: eve fpm sal d pread or the pry. se s of the parties
of the first part adjoining the as on either aide any trees, oveftlangIng bran s
or other obstructions whl oh may endanger the safety or interfere with the use of
said poles and or fixtures or wires attached thereto- or any stru oture on said p
mi a; and the right of ingress and egre as to and over said above de scribed pre-
m and any of the adJoJnJ.zg of the parties of the first part, at any
and all timea, for the purpvas - of patroling the line or repairing, renewing or
adding to the number of said poles, structures, fixtures and wires, and for dot
any ththg neoe s vary or u se f l or convenient- fb r the enjoymen of the ea sement
herein granted ;. also the privilege of roving A any time any or all of said
S � jlt ere:oted upon, over or on Bald land;
:oethr with the right s e e aeent a pr ivi lega s and appu*tenan�ne s irk or to
-' = a- - doh W be • regliired for the full en j o7ment of the rights herein
to �a�re and �o hold the same unto maid party of the second p art , its
eceee r and a is signs , forevc r.
Yt- :, s agreed that the foregoing is the entire contract between the parties
'It has been read and full y understood by the parties of the first
*nd --ftll is - _ _- _• �� _ =•��:_ :___ ___ - _ _ !
understood by them before its exe cut ion # and there is no oonei deer
o re
said ontraot exc ept the consideration herein set forth, and that it
; f"
.
Mood : tha_ t the agent of the panty of the second pa rt aecuri.ng trii s aon�
- w-w- authority. to contract for or to bind the party of the second part b
aemtations or promi. se s and that this mitten agreement is couple
s. n
.. Ite t$rK an p rovi shoe.
... " X
�•'.. _ jl
=:::• �:s < s the parties of the first part have hereunto set their
eAls the da and .
ye fir st above wr itten
- = - oa► li d,ged . . No o
oft
"Senoe oft
{ -_
M . - _ �-�':.. =�r,� • - Ruby Hurt Mos SL46
t�- ;r s.sti•- :i.ler, Roenoke, Va.
Wilson W. ro aer ( )
,
Z Roanoke, Vs .
Audrey M. No ser ( SAL )
- Varga"t R. Moser ( )
Lct= ,.: !". ... - - - . _ .. -• -- ... - -- — " --`-'- - - - - .�..�,....++ ,.. .- r+r,r_r,wc rrearrarwy =erTwra rr��^"!. __
State of Virginia
Co=ty of Roanoke t o -vl t t
I, laoyd Mo Millerp -a Notary Public in and for the County and State afore®
said, do certify that Co C. Moser and Ruby Hurt Moser, his wife, Wilson We U0
and Aud M. ]loser, his wife, e, whose names are signed to the writing hereto &nne�t
bearing date an the 25th day of February, 1940, have this day acknowledged the
same before ease in my said county. -
I further certify that my conadsidon an Notary Publ i o vi ll expire on the
loth day of November, 1942-o
Given under my hand this 22nd day of May, 1940.
Lloyd M. Miller, Notary Publio w1thin
and for the ftate of Virginia at Large.
State of Virginia
County of Roanoke, to -wit t
I g, R. Bowman, a Notary Public in and for the County and Rtat e a f ore sa i d,
do certify that Margaret R. Moser, (single) whose name In signed to tha writing
hereto armexed, bearing date on the 26th day of February, 1940 has this day ack-
nowledged the same before one in my said county*
I further certify that nom; ao=# s elan an Rotary Publi will expire on the
25th day of Ifeb. 19439
Given under my hared this 22nd day off' auly, 1940.
F& Be Bowman, N ot a ry Public
for the State of Va. at Large
In the Clark's offioe of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanvke Vas
this-g day of March, 1941 this easement vna a pre sent ed, *nd with the Certifi
of aoknowledgment thereto annexed, admitted to record at S po o t plock Ao M.
Tax 4,12 Te st e t
Fee 1
0 Ray M. awn Clerk
X929
Rbooived of Appala/fevher"oby Power Co any, a Virginia Corporation, the
om of One and Holl.� Dollars consideration of which Inlet' We Tvbeyp.
and Marion H. Tobey, his grant p and convey unto said Appalachian
easement with the right, privilege and authority to said party of the woond p
its su.acessora, assigns, lessees and tenants to construct, erect, operate and
maintain a line or lines for the purpose of transmitting electric or other power
and a telephone line or lines, in, on, along o ver, th ro ugh, or acro s a the follo
t
ing described lands ai tuated in Cave Spring Di strict , in the County of Roanoke p
In the State of Virginia, to -wi.t t
Bounded on the North bey the lands of Fe C9 Huffman o
Bounded on the South by the lands of C B. Pace
Bounded on the Ba st by the lands of Virgini Iron and Coke Co
Bounded on the We by the lands of W • A. S ewer.
Together with the right to said party of the second part, its auocessora
assigne, to plaoe, erect, maintainp inspect, add to the number of, and relocate
at will, pol a e, cro sear a, or fixture a, and st wires and cable e, adding the
to from time to time, across, tbrou&p or over the above described preml ee s; to
out and at its npt i on, remove from said promise or the premi a e s of the part ie s
of the first part adjoining the same on either side any trees, overhanging branobas
or other obstruotion s which may endanger the safety or interfere with the use of
said poles and or fixtureo or mires attached thereto or any structure on said p
mi nes; and the right of i.ngrons and egress to and over said above described pre-
mi des, and any of the ad joinIngT -.ands of the parties of the first part, at azt
and all tizee, for the purpose - patroling the line, or repairing, renewing or
adding to the number of said poles, stritatmve,, fixtures and wires, and for doln
any thlhg neoessary or useful or convenient for the enjoyment of the ea sement
herein granted ;. al ®o the privilege of removing a time any or an of sa_1.d
improvements ereated upon, over or on said land*
k Together with the righte easements. - pr ivi legs s and appurtenance or to
niq be r egtii red for the full enjoyme of the rights herein
To have and to hold the same vnt a said party of the second p art i i t s
goe s s airs, anal a *signs, fo revs r.
-It- i e agreed that the foregoing I the entire contract between the partie
- .to that 'it has been read and fully understood by the parties of the first
understood by them before ft® execution, and there is no coneider� w
fully* re i
- sa3�d contract ct except the oon si de ra ti on herein set
forth, and that i t
t
that the �t of the party of the second part securing thin �u-
r p arty or to bind the of the second part
authority' to c antra at for P
tai one or omi. sue, and that thf a 1rri t t en agreement i e comply
: �40 - pr
V-
M
c'7
M
M
M M
M
M
M
U
�
_U
CL'
c1r)
U
r
r
V—
U
M
Ix
M
M
V-
CU
M
U
Of
Of
r of
U
Cr)
Of
r
U
M
M
M
r
M
M
U
M
r
r
M
U
r
M
U
r
M
U
r
r
r
�
U
r
r
�
U
r
r �
U
U
U
r
r
r
r
U
r
U
U
r
U
r
r
r
r
N
r
r
� �
N
r
r
U
�
r
0!
U
r
r
r
r
r
r
r r
r
r
N
r
U
r
_
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r r
r
r
�
r
U
r
r
�
O
>
Q
C)
W
Z�
>
_0
`V
C N
C)
C)
CL
/ ~ L �./� ��J'.1
r
o
C
W
N
- 0
�i
C
L
4--
L)
N
L
a)
N
5
W
o
cn
(D
0-
75 0
U) U N
V J
V J
N
�
L
7C3 L �Q
N
�
N r te ,
r
N
0
U
y am' +
c
y am' +
c
S a)
E >, o
L
+r v
L L
U
C)
cn
4"'
U
cn
+�+
O
0
O
0
O - L
U v)
C: c 0_
r
Z
}�
N C/)
L a)
�
z m
�`-•
D
}�
�_
�_
75 (D
cn�
N
L)
y
-__
--
c:
_
•�
U)
Q
in
Z�
C
o
N
N
Z
N
0
�
O
�
N J� .�
- o
C: C) m
v
�
C:
N
En
N 0-
cn
o
t
=
cv
c)
v cn
_
0L
CL
0
'^
a� a�
X
o
o X
ca
N
�.
V,
Q0� 2
W
0-
a-
Q
2-1
O 0
rn
ry
ry
I..1.
U
Z
II
W
` Wi,
U
O
U
8
F S
IP
En
` tit � ,cr T•x >.
�'���'`/ ��s ,I
1
�
.
r
1
•
,
C -2 District Regulations
SEC. 30 -54. C -2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.
Sec. 30 -54 -1. Purpose.
(A) The purpose of this district is to provide locations for a variety of commercial and service
related activities within the urban service area serving a community of several
neighborhoods or large areas of the county. This district is intended for general
application throughout the county. General commercial districts are most appropriately
found along major arterial thoroughfares which serve large segments of the county's
population. The G2 district permits a wide variety of retail and service related uses. Land
uses permitted in this district are generally consistent with the recommendations set forth
in the transition and core land use categories of the comprehensive plan. Site
development regulations are designed to ensure compatibility with adjoining land uses.
(Ord. No. 042208 -16, § 1, 4- 22 -08)
Sec. 30 -54 -2. Permitted Uses.
(A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements
contained in this ordinance. An asterisk ( *) indicates additional, modified or more
stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific
uses.
1. Residential Uses
Accessory Apartment *
Home Beauty /Barber Salon *
Home Occupation, Type I *
Multi - Family Dwelling *
Two - Family Dwelling *
2. Civic Uses
Administrative Services
Clubs
Cultural Services
Day Care Center *
Educational Facilities, College/University
C -2 District Regulations
Educational Facilities, Primary /Secondary
Family Day Care Home
Guidance Services
Park and Ride Facility
Post Office
Public Assembly
Public Parks and Recreational Areas
Safety Services *
Utility Services, Minor
3. Office Uses
Financial Institutions
General Office
Medical Office
Laboratories
4. Commercial Uses
Agricultural Services
Antique Shops
Automobile Dealership, New
Automobile Repair Services, Minor
Automobile Rental /Leasing
Automobile Parts /Supply, Retail
Bed and Breakfast
Boarding House
C -2 District Regulations
Business Support Services
Business or Trade Schools
Commercial Indoor Entertainment
Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation
Commercial Outdoor Entertainment
Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation
Communications Services
Construction Sales and Services
Consumer Repair Services
Fuel Center*
Funeral Services
Garden Center *
Gasoline Station
Hospital
Hotel /Motel /Motor Lodge
Kennel, Commercial
Pawn Shop
Personal Improvement Services
Personal Services
Restaurant, General
Retail Sales
Studio, Fine Arts
Veterinary Hospital /Clinic
C -2 District Regulations
5. Industrial Uses
Recycling Centers and Stations
6. Miscellaneous Uses
Amateur Radio Tower
Parking Facility *
(B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30 -19. An
asterisk ( *) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article
IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses.
1. Civic Uses
Adult Care Residences
Halfway House
Life Care Facility
Nursing Home
Religious Assembly
Utility Services, Major
2. Commercial Uses
Adult Business *
Automobile Dealership, Used
Automobile Repair Services, Major
Car Wash *
Commercial Indoor Amusement
Convenience Store
Dance Hall
Equipment Sales and Rental
C -2 District Regulations
Manufactured Home Sales *
Mini - warehouse *
Outpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Center
Recreational Vehicle Sales and Service *
Restaurant, Drive -in and Fast Food
Surplus Sales
Truck Stop *
3. Industrial Uses
Custom Manufacturing *
Landfill, Rubble *
Transportation Terminal
4. Miscellaneous Uses
Broadcasting Tower
Outdoor Gatherings
(Ord. No. 82493 -8, § 2, 8- 24 -93; Ord. No. 022796 -14, § 1, 2- 27 -96; 042297 -14, § 1, 4- 22 -97;
Ord. No. 042799 -11, § 2, 4- 27 -99; Ord. No. 102803 -15, § 2, 10- 28 -03; Ord. No. 102505 -7, § 2,
10- 25 -05; Ord. No. 042208 -16, § 1, 4- 22 -08; Ord. No. 052411 -9, § 1, 5- 24 -11)
Sec. 30 -54 -3. Site Development Regulations.
General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see
Article IV, Use and Design Standards.
(A) Minimum lot requirements.
1. Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system;
a. Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet).
b. Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
C -2 District Regulations
2. Lots served by either public sewer or water, or both:
a. Area: 15,000 square feet.
b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
(B) Minimum setback requirements.
1. Front yard:
a. Principal structures: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind
the front building line.
b. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line.
2. Side yard: None.
3. Rear yard:
a. Principal structures: 15 feet.
b. Accessory structures: 3 feet.
4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all
streets.
(C) Maximum height of structures.
1. Height limitations:
a. Principal structures: When adjoining property zoned R -1 or R -2, 45 feet,
including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be
increased, provided each required side and rear yard adjoining the R -1 or
R -2 district is increased two feet for each foot in height over 45 feet. In all
locations the height is unlimited unless otherwise restricted by this
ordinance.
b. Accessory structures: actual height of principal structure.
(D) Maximum coverage.
1. Building coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area.
2. Lot coverage: 90 percent of the total lot area.
(Ord. No. 62293 -12, § 10, 6- 22 -93)
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, TUESDAY, JANUARY 22, 2013
ORDINANCE REZONING 10.27 ACRES FROM R -1, LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, TO C -2, GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT,
AND TO OBTAIN A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A NURSING HOME AND
LIFE CARE FACILITY LOCATED AT 5647 STARKEY ROAD, CAVE
SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (TAX MAP NO. 87.18- 01 -37), UPON
THE APPLICATION OF FRIENDSHIP HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER
SOUTH, INC. AND FRIENDSHIP HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER, INC.
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on December 11, 2012, and
the second reading and public hearing were held January 22, 2013; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this
matter on January 7, 2013; and
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing
approximately 10.27 acres, as described herein, and located at 5647 Starkey Road Road
(Tax Map Number 87.18- 01 -37) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed
from the zoning classification of R -1, Low Density Residential District, to the zoning
classification of C -2, General Commercial District.
2. That this action is taken upon the application of Friendship Health and Rehab
Center South, Inc. and Friendship Health and Rehab Center, Inc.
3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following
amended conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby
accepts:
Page 1 of 3
(1) The site will be developed in substantial conformity with the concept plan
dated December 4, 2012 titled "Friendship Health & Rehabilitation Center
South", prepared by Freeman White, Inc. subject to those changes which
may be required by Roanoke County during comprehensive site plan review.
4. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Friendship
Health and Rehab Center South, Inc. and Friendship Health and Rehab Center, Inc. for the
operation of a nursing home and life care facility on 10.27 acres located at 5647 Starkey
Road (Tax Map Number 87.18- 01 -37) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District is substantially
in accord with the adopted 2005 Community Plan, as amended, pursuant to the provisions
of Section 15.2 -2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and that it shall have a
minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood or community, and said special
use permit is hereby approved with the following conditions:
1) The site shall be developed in general conformance to the architectural
renderings titled "Friendship Health & Rehabilitation Center South" prepared by
Freeman White, Inc. dated September 2012.
2) Freestanding light poles on site shall be shielded "cut -off' types no more than
eighteen (18) feet high and arranged so glare is not cast onto adjoining
properties.
3) A Type C buffer shall be installed along all property lines except for the frontage
along Starkey Road. If option 2 is utilized, a wood or vinyl stockade fence and
large evergreen trees (instead of large deciduous trees) shall be installed.
4) No trash service or deliveries to the site shall take place between 11:00 pm and
7:00 am.
5. That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
Being 10.27 acres of real estate located at 5647 Starkey Road and further
described as Tax Map Number 87.18-01-37.
6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to
Page 2of3
amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by
this ordinance.
Page 3of3