HomeMy WebLinkAbout3/11/2014 - RegularRoanoke County
Board of Supervisors
March 11, 2014
INVOCATION:Pastor James L. Armentrout
St. Mark Lutheran Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES FLAG
Disclaimer:
“Any invocation that may be offered before theofficial start of the Board meeting
shall be the voluntary offering of a private citizen, to and for the benefit of the
Board. The views or beliefs expressed by the invocation speaker have not been
previously reviewed or approved by the Board and do not necessarily represent
the religious beliefs or views of the Board in part or as a whole. No member of
the community is required to attend or participate in the invocation and such
decision will have no impact on their right to actively participate in the business of
the Board.”
Page 1of 5
Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors
Agenda
March 11, 2014
Good afternoon and welcome to our meeting for March 11, 2014.Regular meetings are
held on the second and fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00
p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedulewill be
announced.The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be
rebroadcast on Thursday at 7:00 p.m. and on Saturday at 4:00 p.m. Board of
Supervisors meetings can also be viewed online through Roanoke County’s website at
www.RoanokeCountyVA.gov.Our meetings are closed-captioned, so it is important for
everyone to speak directly into the microphones at the podium.Individuals who require
assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors
meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in
advance. Please turn all cell phones off or place on silent.
A.OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 p.m.)
1. Roll Call
B.REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TOOR CHANGE THE ORDER OF
AGENDA ITEMS
C.PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
D.BRIEFINGS
1.Briefing on the February 2014 snow event (Joey Stump, Division
Chief/Emergency Manager)
2.Briefing regardingthe Vinton Library Project (Richard Caywood, Assistant
County Administrator)
E.NEW BUSINESS
Page 2of 5
F.FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1.Ordinance accepting and appropriating donations in the amount of $325 from
citizens donating in the memory of Mr. Michael H. Farris for the purpose of
purchasing medical supplies for Fire/Rescue Station 7 (Clearbrook)(Richard
E. Burch, Jr., Chief of Fire and Rescue)
2.Ordinance accepting and appropriating funds in the amount of $89,600 to
Fire and Rescue for a non-matching grant from the Virginia Department of
Health (GRANT #WV-C11/01-14) for the purchase of computer hardware for
posting EMS records to the Virginia Pre-Hospital Information Bridge (VPHIB)
(Richard E. Burch, Jr., Chief of Fire and Rescue)
3.Ordinance accepting and appropriating a grant in the amount of $83,114 from
the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas Program for the Roanoke Valley
Regional Drug Unit (Howard B. Hall, Chief of Police)
4.Ordinance providing for refunding of the 2004 Lease Financing with Virginia
Resources Authority (Rebecca Owens, Director of Finance)
G.SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1.Ordinance accepting and appropriating a donation to the Roanoke County
Public Library in the amount of $500 from the William L. Whitwell Trust (Diana
Rosapepe, Director of Library Services)
2.Ordinance accepting and appropriating funds in the amount of $28,713.10 to
the Department of Social Services from the Virginia Department of Social
Services (Joyce Earl, Director of Social Services; Jimmy Lyon, Business
Process and Management Analyst)
H.APPOINTMENTS
1.Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Review Committee (appointed by
District)
2.Roanoke County Community Leaders Environmental Action Roundtable
(RCCLEAR)
Page 3of 5
I.CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDAARE CONSIDERED
BY THE BOARD TO BEROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE
RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION
IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT
AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY
1.Approval of minutes –February 11, 2014
2.Request for approval of extension and amendment to the July 1, 2009,
Agreement with Appalachian Power Company for the purchase of electricity
J.REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS
K.REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
L.CITIZENS’ COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
M.REPORTS
1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
2.Capital Reserves
3.Reserve for Board Contingency
4.Treasurer’s Statement of Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy
as of February 28, 2014
N.WORK SESSIONS
1.Work session to review Roanoke County Joint Capital Funding Plan and Debt
Information(Rebecca Owens, Director of Finance)
O.CLOSED MEETING, pursuant to the Code of Virginia as follows
1.Section 2.2.3711.A.1.Personnel, namely discussion concerning appointments
to the League of Older Americans; Ninth District Development Financing, Inc.;
Roanoke Regional Airport Commission; Roanoke Valley Detention
Commission; Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Comprehensive Economic
Development Commission
Page 4of 5
EVENING SESSION –6:00 P.M
.
P.CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION
Q.FUNDING REQUESTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014-2015 BUDGET
1.Health and Human Services Agencies
2.Cultural, Tourism and Other Agencies
R.REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
1. P. Jason Peters
2. Charlotte A. Moore
3. Al Bedrosian
4.Joseph B. “Butch” Church
5. Joseph P. McNamara
S.ADJOURNMENT
Page 5of 5
,SP^LIMQIV&SPIO1IILER`%VGLMXIGXW
00'
;IWX2MRXL7XVIIX7YMXI`'PIZIPERH3LMS`[[[,&1EVGLMXIGXWGSQ`
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 11, 2014
ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING DONATIONS IN
THE AMOUNT OF $325FROM CITIZENS DONATING IN THE MEMORY
OF MR. MICHAEL H. FARISS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PURCHASING
MEDICAL SUPPLIES FOR FIRE/RESCUE STATION 7 (CLEARBROOK)
WHEREAS, the family of Mr. Michael H. Farris requested in lieu of flowers that
donations be sent to the Clearbrook Rescue Squad to support the mission of providing
Emergency Medical Services to the community; and
WHEREAS, the individuals making the donationsdid not realize that the
Clearbrook Rescue Squad dissolved in April of 2006 and prior to that date the Fire and
Rescue Department had initiated 24/7 staffing of an ambulance which continues now;
and
WHEREAS, the donated funds of $325will be used to purchasemedical supplies
for Station 7 (Clearbrook) as intended in the memory of Mr. Michael H. Farris;and
WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter provides that funds be
appropriated by ordinance; and
WHEREAS, first reading of this ordinance was held on March11, 2014,
and the second reading was held onMarch 25, 2014.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1.That the sum of $325is hereby appropriated from citizen donations in
memory of Mr. Michael H. Farris;and
Page 1 of 2
2.These funds are to be allocated to the Fire and Rescue Department for
the purpose of purchasing medical supplies for the ambulances assigned to Station 7
(Clearbrook); and
3.That this ordinance shall take effect from and after the date of adoption.
Page 2 of 2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 11, 2014
ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS IN THE
AMOUNT OF $89,600TO FIRE AND RESCUEFOR ANON-MATCHING
GRANT FROM THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH(GRANT
#WV-C11/01-14)FOR THE PURCHASE OF COMPUTER HARDWARE
FOR POSTING EMS RECORDS TO THE VIRGINIA PRE HOSPITAL
INFORMATION BRIDGE (VPHIB)
WHEREAS, Roanoke County has been awarded a non-matchinggrant from the
Virginia Department of Health (Grant #WV-C11/01-14) in the amount of $89,600; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Health will provide funding in the amount
$89,600to the Fire and Rescue Department; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of these funds is to purchase computer hardware for
posting EMS records to the Virginia Pre Hospital Information Bridge (VPHIB); and
WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter provides that funds be
appropriatedby ordinance; and
WHEREAS, first reading of this ordinance was held on March 11, 2014, and the
second reading was held on March 25, 2014.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1.That the sum of $89,600is hereby accepted and appropriated from the
Virginia Department of Health (Grant #WV-C11/01-14) to the Fire and
Rescue Department; and
2. That this ordinance shall take effect from and after the date of adoption.
Page 1 of 1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 11, 2014
ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS IN THE
AMOUNT OF $83,114 TO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT FROM THE
HIGH INTENSITY DRUG TRAFFICKING AREAS PROGRAM FOR THE
ROANOKE VALLEY REGIONAL DRUG UNIT.
WHEREAS, TheHigh Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas Program(HIDTA), created
by Congress with the Anti-Abuse Act of 1988, provides assistance to Federal, State,
Local and Tribal law enforcement agencies operating in areas determined to be critical
drug-trafficking regions in the United States;
WHEREAS, the purpose of the program is to reduce drug trafficking and
production in the United States;
WHEREAS, all of the jurisdictions within the territorial boundaries of Roanoke
County were accepted into the HIDTA Program;
WHEREAS, HIDTA will provide financial support in the amount of $83,114 to
support this initiative; and
WHEREAS, the use of these funds is intended to improve communications
amongst criminal justice agencies and enhance the ability to disrupt and/or dismantle
drug trafficking organizations within the Roanoke Valley; and
WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter provides that funds be
appropriatedby ordinance; and
WHEREAS, first reading of this ordinance was held on March 11, 2014, and the
second reading was held on March 25, 2014.
Page 1 of 2
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1.That the sum of $83,114is hereby accepted and appropriated from the
High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas Program to the Police Department;
and
2. That this ordinance shall take effect from and after the date of adoption.
Page 2 of 2
Roanoke Valley Regional Drug Initiative
Initiative Description: Elements from the existing Vice / Narcotics Units of the City of Roanoke, City of
Salem, and Roanoke County will be combined into one regional unit. The Virginia State Police will be
contributing two Special Agents and the Town of Vinton will provide one narcotics detective. DEA, ATF,
and Homeland Security will be participating and have requested on site work space. United States
Postal Inspection Service, FBI, and U. S. Marshals will also be participating on a part time basis but will
not be co-located at this time. In addition to enforcement personnel, Roanoke City, Roanoke County,
and Salem will be contributing existing surveillance equipment, office equipment and supplies,
intelligence information, and administrative support staff that are currently assigned to the respective
Vice / Narcotics units. These assets will remain the property of the respective departments but will be
pooled for use by all members of the initiative. The participating agencies will provide appropriate
vehicles for their personnel and Roanoke County will assist Vinton with the acquisition of a vehicle.
All enforcement and administrative staff will be located on the second floor of the Roanoke County
Police Department. Utilizing the space at the Roanoke County Police Department will eliminate the cost
of leasing a work space and will greatly reduce the cost of furnishing a new work space. If in the future a
more appropriate work space is identified, a feasibility and cost analysis will be conducted to determine
if a move should take place. At the current time, the intention is to stay located at the Roanoke County
Police Department.
The Roanoke County Police Department will serve as the lead agency and the Roanoke County
Department of Finance will serve as the fiscal agent and will be responsible for dispersal of funds to the
participating agencies.
The Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Offices of the City of Roanoke, City of Salem, and Roanoke County are
participants in the initiative. For year one, the goal is to have an identified Assistant Commonwealth
Attorney in each jurisdiction coordinate all drug prosecution and asset forfeitures. In the future, the
goal is to have an Assistant Commonwealth Attorney, with the necessary administrative support staff,
who will serve as the dedicated narcotics prosecutor in all three jurisdictions and will be able to work
with the United States Attorney to prosecute cases in Federal Court. The goal will be to identify
organized drug trafficking organizations and when possible to prosecute the cases as drug trafficking
conspiracies. The Commonwealth’s Attorneys will partner with the U. S. Attorney’s Office in regards to
identifying cases to be prosecuted in the federal courts. An additional component will be the creation of
a local, multi-jurisdictional state grand jury.
The initiative will continue to use drug purchases, confidential informants, and surveillance as the
primary investigative approaches to identify drug trafficking organizations, the initiative will not focus on
street level distribution. The focus of prosecutions will be on the disruption of organized drug
trafficking groups which is anticipated to contribute to the overall reduction of violent crime and
property crime in the Roanoke Valley.
The initiative will also place a renewed emphasis on cases developed from package interdiction. The
United States Postal Inspection Service has reported a large increase in the quantity of drugs being sent
through the U. S. mail and is currently in the process of establishing a working group for package
interdiction. Specifically, there has been a large increase of high grade marijuana being shipped in from
California, Oregon, and other West Coast states. The goal is to not just to prosecute the person
receiving the package but to identify the local distribution network and the out of state source of the
drugs. USPS reports that there are currently two postal inspectors covering 13,000 square miles in the
Roanoke Valley and southwest Virginia and that they do not have the resources to conduct package
interdiction without substantial assistance from other law enforcement. The Roanoke Valley Regional
Drug Initiative has already made a commitment of personnel to assist the USPS in this package
interdiction effort. This effort will also include package interdiction at the various shippers to include
UPS and Fed Ex.
Performance Targets:
Number of DTO’s to be disrupted or dismantled: 15
Drug Targets
Marijuana: 100 kgs
Heroin: ½ kilogram
Methamphetamine: 20 labs
Cocaine: 5 kgs
Asset Seizure Targets: $300,000
Number of Firearms seized: 10
Number of Arrests: 100
Number of Leads passed on to other LEA’s: 50
Number of Cases Opened: 15
Number of Events to be Deconflicted: TBD
Number of Title 3’s anticipated: TBD
Budget:
Facilities:
Electronic Door: $ 1950
Door Reprogramming: $ 192
4 additional work spaces: $ 7,340
Off-site Storage Bay Utilities, approx. $60 per month: $ 720
Storage Cabinets for equipment $ 1, 000
Smart Board / Presentation System $ 5,000
IT Costs:
6 phones at $250 per phone: $ 1,500
12 additional phone lines at $4.00 per line per month: $ 575
Copier / Printer leasing costs: $ 3,000
Undercover Internet Account, $60 per month: $ 720
Radio Communications:
Encrypt 8 City Radios and 1 Vinton radio at $700 per radio: $ 6,300
Purchase of 3 additional radios, for DEA, ATF, and Homeland $ 12,250
Security at $3,750
Personnel Costs:
Part-time ( 29 hrs ) Administrative Assistant at $12.50 per hr, $ 12,567
$18,850 per year,pro-rated to start May 1
Other Costs:
$12,130
PE/PI ( Purchase Evidence / Pay Informants) :
Overtime: $17,870
Total $83,114
districts, to finance or refinance the cost of water supply and wastewater treatment
facilities, solid waste disposal facilities, certain drainage projects, public safety facilities,
local government buildings, infrastructure for broadband services, airport facilities, public
transportation projects, remediation of brownfields and contaminated properties, renewable
energy projects, oyster restoration, recovered gas energy facilities, the location or retention
of federal facilities in the state and the support of the transition of former federal facilities to
other uses, land conservation, park facilities, site acquisition for economic development,
and certain local government infrastructure.
VRA completed its summer issue of the Virginia Pooled Financing Program (VPFP) on
August 14, 2013. The County of Roanoke participated in this sale taking advantage of the
pool program issue structure that resulted in a blended "AAA/AA" rating from both Moody's
and Standard & Poor's rating agencies.
The ordinance authorized the refunding of the 2004 Bonds to provide annual debt service
savings to be used for the replacement of the Integrated Financial System, a Tier one
capital project which significantly impacts County operations.
Original estimated savings from the refunding transaction were approximately $2.6 million.
Unfortunately interest rates increased sharply and much of the anticipated savings were
lost.
Aftercareful analysis by staff, discussions with County administration and the
recommendation of the County financial advisors, Raymond James, the County proceeded
with this transaction refunding certain bond maturities that yielded at least a net present
value savings of 6%. Total savings were $950,523 with the majority of the savings in 2013-
2014 and 2014-2015. The all in true interest cost was 3.4780% and the net present value
savings was 7.14%.
The County now has another opportunityto refund the remaining maturities that could
result in additional saving opportunities. Nevertheless, the County will need to find a way
to fund the Integrated Financial System in the near future.
Debt Refunding Opportunity:
The County, like many other surrounding municipalities, hasdebt that has been used for
government and School projects. The County’s debt compares similarly to that of other
governments.The County has a very conservative debt management program with a plan
in place to fund the debt payments without adding any burden to the tax payers.
Currently we are ratedby Moody’s, Standard and Poor’s and Fitch Aa1, AA+, and AA
respectively. These ratings allow the County to borrow funds at very low interest rates.
The County of Roanoke works with Financial Advisors, Raymond James & Associates,
Inc., annually to review the County’s outstanding debt for potential refunding opportunities.
Page 2of 4
Based on this review and current market conditions, the County has the opportunity to
refund the remaining 2004 lease revenue bonds through Virginia Resources Authority
(VRA). These bonds were originally issued through VRA to finance the Public Safety
Center. As has been previously done, the refunding will provide the opportunity of funds
for much needed capital while reducing the interest costs and leaving the final maturity the
same.
Current market conditions are showing projected refunding savings in the range of
$400,000 to $600,000, however as with the last refunding the market is ever changing and
difficult to predict.Staff will continue to work with financial advisor,Raymond James,and
VRA to ensure that the County of Roanoke nets the most savings possible with the
refunding.
Below is the AAA MMD index of the 10 year maturity since May 2013. With the passage of
time and the favorable interest rate environment, the County’s remaining VRA Series
2004A Bonds are generating savings in the current market.
VRA Series 2004 Roanoke
Refunding –July 2013
Attached is the tentative timeline for VRA. Tentative bond sale dates would be early May
2014.Staff willprovide an information report as has been done previously after the sale of
the bonds.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Savings from the 2004 refunding opportunity will be appropriated through the 2014-2015
budgetto be used for the replacement of the Integrated Financial System.
Page 3of 4
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommendsapproval of the first reading of ordinance and scheduling the second
reading for March 25, 2014.
Page 4of 4
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 11, 2014
ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE REFUNDING OF 2004 LEASE
FINANCING WITH VIRGINIA RESOURCES AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, on June 1, 2004, the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Local
Government") entered into a Financing Lease (the "Original Financing Lease"), with
Virginia Resources Authority ("VRA"), and VRA acquired the Original Financing Lease
pursuant to a Local Lease Acquisition Agreement dated as of June 16, 2004, between
VRA and the Local Government; and
WHEREAS, VRA acquired the Original Financing Lease with a portion of the
proceeds of one of the series of VRA's Virginia Pooled Financing Program Bonds (the
"VRA VPFP Bonds"); and
WHEREAS, VRA has advised the Local Government that the credit markets are
currently favorable for the refunding of a portion of the VRA VPFP Bonds (the
"Refunding Transaction"), which may enable VRA to pass on annual debt service
savings to the Local Government; and
WHEREAS, VRA will effect the Refunding Transaction through the issuance and
sale of a series of refunding bonds issued under VRA's Virginia Pooled Financing
Program (the "VRA Refunding Bonds"); and
WHEREAS, VRA has indicated that if the Local Government participates in the
Refunding Transaction the most significant modifications required to the terms of the
Original Financing Lease will be to reconcile the Rental Payments and redemption
provisions of the Original Financing Lease with the debt service payments and
redemption provisions of the VRA Refunding Bonds and such modifications will be
Page 1 of 3
embodied in amendments to the Original Financing Lease or in replacements thereof
(the "Local Refunding Documents"); and
WHEREAS, unless otherwise defined each capitalized term used in this
Ordinance shall have the meaning given it in the Original Financing Lease; and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March11, 2014, and
the second reading of this ordinance was held on March 25, 2014.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA:
1.Agreement to Participate. The Local Government's participation in the
Refunding Transaction is hereby approved provided that (i) the minimum savings
threshold to be realized by the Local Government shall be not less than three percent
(3%) savings on a present value basis compared to the existing and outstanding Rental
Payments under the Original Financing Lease or portion thereof to be refunded and (ii)
the term of the Original Financing Lease as amended or replaced in the Refunding
Transaction shall not be extended past the end of the fiscal year in which occurs the
current final Rental Payment under the Original Financing Lease.
2.Authorization of Local Refunding Documents. Each of the Local
Government's Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, County Administrator and Director
of Finance (each a "Local Representative") is authorized to execute and deliver the
Local Refunding Documents in such form as will reflect and facilitate the Refunding
Transaction within the parameters and intent of this Ordinance. The Clerk to the Board
of Supervisors is authorized to affix the Local Government's seal on any such
documents and attest or counter-sign the same.
Page 2 of 3
3.Official Statement. The Local Government authorizes and consents to the
inclusion of information with respect to the Local Government in VRA’s Preliminary
Official Statement and Official Statement, both to be prepared in connection with the
sale of the VRA Refunding Bonds.
4.Other Actions. Each Local Representative is authorized to execute and
deliver all certificates, documents, agreements and instruments and to take all such
further action as they may consider necessary and desirable in connection with the
refunding of all or a portion of the Original Financing Lease and the consummation of
the Refunding Transaction, including the execution and delivery of such documents and
the making of such elections as may be reasonably requested by VRA to maintain or
establish a tax-favored status for the VRA Refunding Bonds.
5.Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately.
Page 3 of 3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 11, 2014
ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING A DONATION IN
THE AMOUNT OF $500 TO THE ROANOKE COUNTY PUBLIC
LIBRARY FROM THE WILLIAM L. WHITWELL TRUSTFOR THE
BENEFIT OF THE HOLLINS BRANCH LIBRARY
WHEREAS,the Roanoke County Public Library system has received a donation
in the amount of $500 from the William L. Whitwell Trust, to be used for the benefit of
the Hollins Branch Library; and
WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter provides that funds be
appropriated by ordinance; and
WHEREAS, first reading of this ordinance was held on February 25, 2014, and
the second reading was held onMarch 11, 2014.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1.That the sum of $500is hereby appropriated to the Roanoke County
Public Library, Hollins Branch, to be used to purchase items for the collection; and,
2.That this ordinance shall take effect from and after the date of adoption.
Page 1 of 1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 11, 2014
ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS IN THE
AMOUNT OF $28,713.10 TO THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL
SERVICES FROM THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL
SERVICES
WHEREAS, The Statehas made available $28,713.10ofadditional
appropriations tothe Department of Social Servicesforthe assumption ofadministrative
responsibilities for the Family Access to Medical Insurance Security program; and
WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter provides that funds be
appropriated by ordinance; and
WHEREAS, first reading of this ordinance was held on February 25, 2014, and
the second reading was held on March 11, 2014.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1.That the sum of $28,713.10 is hereby appropriated from the
Commonwealthof Virginiaandto the Department of Social Services for the purposes as
follows:
$18,231.10for salary and benefits for an additional full time Benefit Programs
Specialist and $10,482for overtime.
2.That this ordinance shall take effect from and after the date of adoption.
Page 1 of 1
I
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY,MARCH 11, 2014
RESOLUTION APPROVINGAND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET
FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FORTHIS DATE
DESIGNATED AS ITEM I- CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for March 11,
2014, designated as Item I- Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred
in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 2
inclusive, as follows:
1.Approval of minutes – February 11, 2014
2.Request for approval of extension and amendment to the July 1, 2009,
Agreement with Appalachian Power Company for the purchase of electricity
Page 1 of 1
County of Roanoke, Virginia
Policy for County Capital Reserves
I. Background
The County of Roanoke recognizes one of the keys to sound financial
management is the development of a systematic way to fund capital projects,
including technology projects.In addition to the Debt Policy, the County believes
it is important to set up a funding stream and guidelines to fund some capital and
technology projects, or portions thereof, on a pay-as-you-go basis.The National
Advisory Council on State and Local Budgeting (NACSLB) has issued guidelines
representing standards of excellence in governmental budgeting that include the
preparation of policies and plans for capital asset acquisition, maintenance, and
replacement (Principle 2; Element 5; Practice 5.2). This policy addresses this
standard.
II. Purpose
This policy will establish guidelines to set aside reserves to fund County
capital projects, including technology projects
III. Policy Guidelines for Major County Capital Reserve
a. The Board of Supervisors hereby establishes a Major County Capital
Reserve for the purpose of accumulating funds to pay-as-you-go for
County Capital projects identified in the County Capital Improvements
Plan that is adopted by the Board of Supervisors
b. Funds will be deposited into the Major County Capital Reserve from the
following sources:
i. As specified in the Policy for Use of General Fund Revenue in
Excess of Budget at Year End,the revenues in excess of budget
will be allocated first to the General Fund Unappropriated Balance
to the extent required, and next to the Major County Capital
Reserve
ii. Any additional funds that the Board of Supervisors appropriates to
the Reserve
Page 1 of 3
c. Funds may be allocated from the Major County Capital Reserve for the
following purposes:
i. Cash outlay for projects identified in the County Capital
Improvements Plan adopted by the Board of Supervisors
ii. Debt payments to expedite projects identified in the County Capital
Improvements Plan adopted by the Board of Supervisors
iii. Land purchase opportunities, even if they are not included in the
County Capital Improvements Plan
IV. Policy Guidelines for Minor County Capital Reserve
a. The Board of Supervisors hereby renames the County Capital Fund
Unappropriated Balance as the Minor County Capital Reserve.
b. Funds will be deposited into the Minor County Capital Reserve from the
following sources:
i. As specified in the Policy for Use of Unspent Expenditure
Appropriations at Year End,the unencumbered expenditure
savings will be allocated 55% to the department, 10% to the
Technology Reserve, and the remaining 35% to the Minor County
Capital Reserve
ii. As specified in the County Charter, the proceeds from the sale of
land and fixed assets, unless specifically appropriated otherwise by
the Board of Supervisors, will be deposited to the Minor County
Capital Reserve
iii. Any additional funds that the Board of Supervisors appropriates to
the Reserve
c. Funds may be allocated from the Minor County Capital Reserve for the
following purposes:
i. Cash outlay for minor County capital projects. These are projects
that are not normally in the County Capital Improvements Plan, and
are usually less than $500,000
ii. Architectural and engineering services for all capital projects,
whenever possible
iii. Other one-time expenditures
iv. Major County Capital Projects as identified in the County Capital
Improvements Plan, adopted by the Board of Supervisors
Page 2 of 3
Policy Guidelines for County Technology Reserve
V.
a. The Board of Supervisors hereby establishes a County Technology
Reserve for the purpose of accumulating funds to pay-as-you-go for
County technology projects identified and prioritized by the Technology
Governance Committee, and approved by the County Administrator.
b. Funds will be deposited into the County Technology Reserve from the
following sources;
i. As specified in the Policy for use of Unexpended Appropriations at
the End of Each Fiscal Year, the unencumbered expenditure
savings will be allocated 55% to the department, 10% to the
Technology Reserve, and the remaining 35% to the Minor Capital
Reserve
ii. The proceeds from the sale of IT equipment
iii. Any additional funds that the Board of Supervisors appropriates to
the Reserve
c. Funds may be allocated from the Technology Reserve for the following
purposes:
i. Cash outlay for projects identified and prioritized by the Technology
Governance Committee and approved by the County Administrator
ii. Debt payments to expedite projects identified and prioritized by the
Technology Governance Committee and approve by the County
Administrator and the Board of Supervisors
Page 3 of 3
County of Roanoke
Policy for Use of Unexpended Expenditure Appropriations at Year End
I. Background
At the end of a fiscal year, unspent expenditure appropriations generally lapse and
revert to a reserve or fund balance within the fund in which the appropriations originated.
In some cases it is desirable to reappropriate a portion of these funds to allow for the
completion of projects or purchases in process. The County provides for these instances
by including wording in the Appropriation Ordinance that encompasses encumbrances,
capital projects and school funds.The National Advisory Council on State and Local
Budgeting (NACSLB) has issued guidelines representing standards of excellence in
governmental budgeting that include the preparation of policies and plans for capital
asset acquisition, maintenance, and replacement (Principle 2; Element 5; Practice 5.2).
This policy addresses this standard.
II. Purpose
This policy would establish guidelines to fund the Minor County Capital Reserve, the
Technology Reserve, and to distribute unspent funds at year end to departments for
needed expenditures. This additional departmental funding will provide an opportunity
for departments to invest in items that will assist them in meeting their service delivery
objectives. Encouraging frugal management practices will provide a more flexible
environment and allow innovative and efficient approaches to servicing our citizens.
III. Performance Standard
Departments will not engage in practices, for the purpose of solely generating savings,
that will adversely affect the quality of service delivery, unless approved by the County
Administrator and/or the Board of Supervisors.
IV. Policy Guidelines
A. When the County's accounts are closed out at the fiscal year-end, the
unencumbered expenditure savings will be allocated as follows:
a.55% of the unencumbered expenditure savings from each departmental budget
of the General Fund will be designated for reappropriation to that department in
the following fiscal year,
b. 10% will be allocated to a Technology Reserve for technology prioritized by the
Technology Governance Committee and approved by the County
Administrator, and
c. The remaining 35% of the unencumbered expenditure savings will revert to the
Minor County Capital Reserve for future capital projects approved by the Board
of Supervisors.
B. Requests for the reappropriation of departmental funds will be evaluated and
approved by the County Administrator on an item-by-item basisThese funds are
-be used for expenditures
such as vehicle replacement, computers, renovations, training or other purposes that
relate to the department's mission and do not require expenditures in future fiscal
years. These funds cannot be used for salary increases, additional personnel, or
expansion of services.
Page 1 of 2
C. The use of Technology Reserve funds are governed by a separate Technology
Reserve Policy
D. The use of Minor Capital Reserve funds are governed by a separate Capital Reserve
Policy
Page 2 of 2
County of Roanoke, Virginia
Debt Policy
I. Introduction
The County of Roanoke recognizes one of the keys to sound financial
management is the development of a debt policy.This need is recognized by
bond rating agencies and development of a debt policy is a recommended
practice by the Government Finance Officers Association.A debt policy
establishes the parameters for issuing debt and managing outstanding debt. It
also provides guidance to administration regarding the timing and purposes for
which debt may be issued, types and amounts of permissible debt, and the
method of sale that may be used. The debt policy should recognize an
obligation to full and timely repayment of all debt as an essential requirement
for entry into the capital markets. Adherence to a debt policy helps to ensure
that a government maintains a sound position and that credit quality is
protected. The debt policy is to be used in conjunction with the Operating and
Capital Improvements Budget, the Capital Improvements Program (CIP), and
other financial policies. Advantages of a debt policy are as follows:
Enhances the quality of decisions.
Rationalizes the decision-making process.
Identifies objectives for staff to implement.
Demonstrates a commitment to long-term financial planning objectives.
Viewed positively by the rating agencies.
II. Purposes for Debt Issuance
The County may issue debt for the purpose of acquiring or constructing Capital
Projects including buildings, machinery, equipment, furniture and fixtures.
When feasible, debt issuances will be pooled together to minimize issuance
costs. The County will prepare and adopt annually a five year Capital
Improvements Program to identify and establish an orderly plan to meet the
. The Capital Improvements Program will also
identify all debt-related projects and the debt service impact upon operations
identified.
III. Guidelines for Issuing Debt
The County recognizes that the essential components of a debt policy are the
limitations and guidelines set by the locality. The following guidelines reflect
philosophy concerning indebtedness:
The County will not use short-term borrowing to finance operating needs,
except in instances as described under Revenue Anticipation Notes.
Long-term debt will be used in compliance with all aspects of the debt
policy.
The maturity of any debt will not exceed the expected useful life of the
project for which the debt is issued.
Each project proposed for financing through debt issuance will have an
analysis performed for review of tax impact and future operating costs
associated with the project and debt issuance.
At a minimum, all issuances of Debt require approval and appropriation of
the proceeds by the Board of Supervisors with additional approvals, if
applicable, indicated in the ypes of Debt/Structural Features
IV. Debt Limits
The County does not have any Constitutional or Statutory Debt Limits. The
County does abide by the following self-imposed debt targets:
Net Debt as a percentage of Assessed Value will not exceed 3.0%.
The Net Debt per Capita will not exceed a ratio of $2,500.
General Obligation Debt Service as a percentage of General
Governmental Expenditures will not exceed 10%.
These ratios will be calculated each year in conjunction with the budget process
and the audit.
V. Types of Debt/Structural Features
A. Bond Anticipation Notes
The County may issue Bond Anticipation Notes (BANs) in
expectation of General Obligation Bonds or Revenue Bonds
when cash is required in order for the financed capital project to
be initiated or continue or when long-term markets do not
appear appropriate on a given date, but have a clear potential
for improvement within 12 months.
The County will issue BANs for a period not to exceed two
years.
No BANs will be rolled over more than one additional two year
period.
B. Revenue Anticipation Notes
Revenues was designed to provide adequate cash flow to avoid
the need for Revenue Anticipation Notes (RANs).
The County may issue RANs in an extreme emergency beyond
source will be received subsequent to the timing of funds
needed.
The County will issue RANs for a period not to exceed the one
year period permitted under the Constitution of Virginia, Article
VII section 10.
C. General Obligation Bonds
The Constitution of Virginia, Article VII section 10, and the
Public Finance Act provide the authority for a County to issue
General Obligation (GO) Debt with no limit on the amount of GO
Debt that a County may issue.
The County may issue GO Debt for capital projects or other
properly approved projects.
All debt secured by the general obligation of the County must be
approved by the Board of Supervisors and a public referendum,
with the exception of Virginia Public School Authority (VPSA)
Bonds and State Literary Fund Loans which do not need
approval by referendum.
D. VPSA Bonds and State Literary Fund Loans
School capital projects may be constructed with debt, either
through VPSA Bonds or State Literary Fund Loans, and
refunding bonds with preference given to accessibility and
interest rates.
Approval of the School Board is required prior to approval by the
Board of Supervisors.
E. Revenue Bonds
The County may issue Revenue bonds to fund enterprise
activities or for capital projects which will generate a revenue
stream.
The bonds will include written covenants which will require that
the revenue sources are sufficient to fund the debt service
requirements.
Cost of issuance, debt service reserve funds and capitalized
interest may be included in the capital project costs and thus are
fully eligible for reimbursement from bond proceeds.
F. Capital Acquisition Notes and Leases
The County may issue short-term notes or capital leases to
purchase buildings, machinery, equipment, furniture and
fixtures.
G. Moral Obligation Debt
The County may enter into leases, contracts, or other
agreements with other public bodies which provide for the
payment of debt when revenues of such agencies may prove
insufficient to cover debt service.
Payment of such moral obligation debt service will be done
when the best interest of the County is clearly demonstrated.
While such moral obligation support does not affect the debt
limit of the County, the amount of bonds issued with the
potential demands on the County. There is no legal obligation,
but the County is placing its good name and reputation on the
line and there is every expectation that the County would make
good any deficiencies when a default exists.
VI. Credit Objectives
The County of Roanoke will strive to maintain or improve its current bond
ratings. The County will also maintain relationships with the rating agencies
that aThe rating
the Operating and Capital Improvements Budget.
VII. Authorized Methods of Sale
The County will select a method of sale that is the most appropriate in light of
financial, market, transaction-specific and issuer-related conditions. Debt
obligations are generally issued through competitive sale. If the County and its
financial advisor determine that a competitive sale would not result in the best
outcome for the County, then a negotiated sale, private placement or other
method may be chosen.
VIII. Selecting Outside Finance Professionals
The County of Roanoke will retain external finance professionals to be selected
through a competitive process. The finance professionals will include, but may
not belimited to, the financial advisor, bond counsel and the underwriter. The
finance professionals will assist in developing a bond issuance strategy,
preparing bond documents and marketing bonds to investors. The length of the
contracts will be determined by the County. The selection process will require
experience in the following: municipal debt,diverse financial structuring, and
pricing municipal securities.
IX. Advance Refunding of Debt
The County may issue advance refunding bonds in accordance with federal tax
law. An advance refunding may be issued to reduce outstanding principal,
reduce interest costs, to eliminate restrictive debt covenants, or in the event of
financial emergencies or hardships.In determining whether to consider an
advance refunding, the County will carefully consider whether further savings
can be achieved by deferring the sale to a later date. The goal is that the
savings (net of all issuance costs and any cash contribution to the refunding)
will be at least 3 percent, unless otherwise justified by the County.
X. Disclosures
The County will maintain the following practices to ensure proper disclosures:
The County will maintain good communications with bond rating agencies
and Capital Improvements Budget.
The County will follow the National Federation of Municipal Analysts and
Government Finance Officers Association policy of full continuing
disclosure.
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.
debt ratios in the Operating and Capital Improvements Budget with an
analysis of the impact, if any moral obligation debt would have on the debt
ratios.
P
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 11, 2014
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN
CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a
closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance
with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the
Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was
conducted in conformity with Virginia law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each member’s knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements
by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution
applies;and
2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the
closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia.
Page 1 of 1
FY2014-2015 Contributions
Health and Human Services Agencies
FY13FY14FY15FY15
AdoptedAdoptedRequestProposed
Agency Name
$8,900
Adult Care Center of the Roanoke Valley$8,900$8,800
$2,500
The Advancement Foundation$600$600
$5,000
American Red Cross$3,300$3,300
$8,910
Bethany Hall$1,100$1,300
$5,000
Big Brothers and Big Sisters of Roanoke Valley$4,300$4,400
$10,000
Blue Ridge Independent Living Center$1,000$1,000
$6,291
Blue Ridge Legal Services, Inc.$800$900
Blue Ridge Literacy
$2,000
$1,100$1,200
(formerly Literacy Volunteers of Roanoke Valley)
Boys & Girls Clubs of Southwest Virginia$900$1,000$7,500
Bradley Free Clinic$5,200$5,400$5,600
Brain Injury Services of SWVA$2,800$2,900$3,000
Child Health Investment Partnership (CHIP)$19,200$19,300$20,944
$9,500
Children's Trust$6,300$6,300
Christmas Store$2,200$2,300$3,000
Commonwealth Catholic Charities$400$500$2,500
Conflict Resolution Center, Inc.$1,100$1,400$5,000
Council of Community Svcs - Info and Referral Center$2,800$2,800$3,000
Council of Community Svcs - Nonprofit Resource Center$500$500$500
Family Promise (formerly Roanoke Valley Interfaith Hospitality
$3,000
$1,000$1,000
Network
)
Family Service of the Roanoke Valley$4,100$4,100$4,100
$5,000
Feeding America - Southwest Virginia$4,700$4,900
$600
Goodwill Industries of the Valleys$500$600
$3,000
Greenvale School$0$300
$2,000
Habitat for Humanity$1,600$1,600
$37,600
LOA Area Agency on Aging$14,900$15,100
$2,000
Manna Ministries$1,000$1,200
$1,000
Mental Health America of Roanoke Valley$1,000$1,000
$38,000
Mountain View Humane$0$0
$1,000
Presbyterian Community Center$800$800
$10,000
Rebuilding Together$400$500
$5,000
Roanoke Area Ministries$1,400$1,500
$4,500
Roanoke County Prevention Council$1,900$2,100
$3,000
Roanoke Valley SPCA$1,000$1,400
$2,000
Roanoke Valley Speech & Hearing Center$1,600$1,700
$10,000
Saint Francis of Assisi Service Dog Foundation$4,000$4,700
$5,000
Salem/Roanoke County Community Food Pantry$5,000$5,000
FY2014-2015 Contributions
Health and Human Services Agencies
FY13FY14FY15FY15
AdoptedAdoptedRequestProposed
Agency Name
Salvation Army$2,900$3,000$3,000
Southeast Rural Community Assistance Project, Inc.$600$600$2,000
Trust House$3,700$3,500$4,000
Total Human Service Agencies$114,600$118,500$254,945
7SGMEP7IVZMGI%KIRGMIW
$22,300
TAP$22,900$22,300
$14,600
TAP - Transitional Living Center/Permanent Supportive Housing$14,700$14,600
Total Social Service Agencies
$37,600$36,900$36,900
'SRXVEGXYEP6IPEXMSRWLMTJSV7IVZMGIW
The BRBH budget request represents the County’s portion of the 10 percent local match that the Department of Behavioral Health and
Developmental Disabilities mandates that local Community Service Boards obtain from local governments in its service area. Failure to fully fund
this request could result in additional funding cuts from the Commonwealth. Although not funding the full local match could result in state cuts, this
has never been enforced in past years when local funding fell short of the required match.
$173,000$175,000$244,854
Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare
Grand Total Health and Human Services Agencies$325,200$330,400$536,699
FY2014-2015 Contributions
Cultural, Tourism, and Other Agencies
FY13FY14FY15FY15
AdoptedAdoptedRequestProposed
Agency Name
Blue Ridge Land Conservancy (formerly Western Virginia Land Trust)$2,000$2,000
$2,500
Blue Ridge Soil and Water Conservation District$1,000$1,000$4,000
Center in the Square$33,500$33,700
$35,000
Center in the Square - Capital$10,200$10,200$15,000
Clean Valley Council, Inc$1,500$1,600
$5,000
FRIENDS of the Blue Ridge Parkway$8,000$8,400$17,800
Harrison Museum of African American Culture$400$800
$15,000
History Museum & Historical Society of Western Va. - O. Winston Link
$2,400$2,500
$8,000
Museum
History Museum & Historical Society of Western Va.$3,500$3,500
$12,000
Hollins University - The Eleanor D. Wilson Art Museum$15,900$16,000$19,161
Interstate 81 Corridor Coalition$0$0
$5,000
Jefferson Center Foundation$1,700$1,800$25,000
Mill Mountain Theatre$0$0
$5,000
Mill Mountain Zoo $10,200$10,300$15,000
Miss Virginia Pageant$1,000$1,000
$1,200
Miss Virginia Pageant - TV Sponsorship$2,200$2,300$4,950
Opera Roanoke$900$900
$2,000
Roanoke Higher Education Center$10,200$10,300$20,000
Roanoke River Basin Association$0$0
$4,000
Roanoke Symphony$4,800$5,000$8,000
Roanoke Valley Sister Cities$2,600$2,600
$2,800
Salem Museum and Historical Society$700$800$800
Salem-Roanoke Baseball Hall of Fame$1,400$1,500
$2,800
Salem/Roanoke County Chamber of Commerce$5,200$5,200$5,800
Science Museum of Western Virginia$15,800$15,700
$20,700
Small Business Development Center$3,000$3,000$5,000
Tri-County Lake Administrative Commission (TLAC) Smith Mtn Lake$0$0
$1,000
Vinton Chamber of Commerce - Business Recruitment$3,900$4,000$12,000
Vinton Dogwood Festival$1,000$1,000
$1,000
Vinton Historical Society$2,100$2,400$5,000
Virginia Amateur Sports$39,400$38,000
$45,000
Virginia Museum of Transportation$4,300$4,600$5,000
Williamson Road Area Business Association$2,000$2,400
$3,700
Young Audiences of Virginia, Inc.$1,000$1,000
$1,000
Sub-Total$191,800$193,500$335,211
FY2014-2015 Contributions
Cultural, Tourism, and Other Agencies
FY13FY14FY15FY15
AdoptedAdoptedRequestProposed
Agency Name
(YIW
4IV'ETMXE'SRXVMFYXMSRW
These funding allocations represent memberships in the specific organization and, by nature, must
be funded at the full amount to retain membership.
YES NO
KK
International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI)$1,200$1,200$1,200
KK
National Association of Counties$1,770$1,770$1,770
KK
Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce - Dues$2,630$2,630$2,630
KK
Roanoke Valley Alleghany Regional Commission$63,208$63,442$68,126
KK
Salem/Roanoke County Chamber of Commerce$1,000$1,000$1,000
KK
Vinton Chamber of Commerce - Dues$500$500$500
KK
Virginia Association of Counties$20,391$20,391$20,391
Virginia First Industrial Authority (Contractual Agreement)$34,255$34,255$34,255$34,255
KK
Virginia Institute of Government Membership$0$0$5,000
KK
Virginia Municipal League$10,518$10,893$11,160
KK
Virginia Western Community College - CCAP Program*$0$125,000
$125,000
Virginia Western Community College - Scholarship$15,354$0N/AN/A
Virginia Western Community College - Site Development
$40,579$0N/A
N/A
(
FY12-13 was last year of 5 year commitment)
Sub-Total$191,405$261,081$271,032$34,255
'SQQYRMX]-RZIWXQIRXW
These organizations have made prior agreements with Roanoke County for annual funding. The FY14-15
figures presented below represent the organizations' expecations for contribution/membership for the next fiscal year.
YES NO
Art Museum of Western Virginia (Taubman Museum)
$40,000$40,000$40,000$40,000
Contractual Agreement
Art Museum of Western Virginia (Taubman Museum) -
Roanoke County Schools Education Program$41,700$41,700$41,700$41,700
Contractual Agreement
KK
Greenway Commission$34,400$34,300$35,080
KK
Roanoke Regional Partnership $174,456$175,033$176,289
KK
Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau$201,600$447,168$436,839
Sub-Total$492,156$738,201$729,908
Grand Total Cultural, Tourism & Other$875,361$1,192,782$1,336,151