Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
4/26/2016 - Regular
INVOCATION: Dr. Maurita Wiggins Valley Community Church Roanoke County Board of Supervisors April 26, 2016 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES FLAG Disclaimer: "Any invocation that may be offered before the official start of the Board meeting shall be the voluntary offering of a private citizen, to and for the benefit of the Board. The views or beliefs expressed by the invocation speaker have not been previously reviewed or approved by the Board and do not necessarily represent the religious beliefs or views of the Board in part or as a whole. No member of the community is required to attend or participate in the invocation and such decision will have no impact on their right to actively participate in the business of the Board. " Page 1 of 5 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Agenda April 26, 2016 Good afternoon and welcome to our meeting for April 26, 2016. Regular meetings are held on the second and fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Thursday at 7:00 p.m. and on Saturday at 4:00 p.m. Board of Supervisors meetings can also be viewed online through Roanoke County's website at www.RoanokeCountyVA.gov. Our meetings are now closed -captioned, so it is important for everyone to speak directly into the microphones at the podium. Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance. Please turn all cell phones off or place on silent. A. OPENING CEREMONIES 1. Roll Call B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS D. BRIEFINGS E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request to approve the Cable Television budget for fiscal year 2016-2017 (Elaine Bays -Murphy, Cable Access Director) 2. Resolution approving the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority (RVRA) budget for fiscal year 2016-2017 (Dan Miles, CEO, Roanoke Valley Resources Authority, Anne Marie Green, Special Assistant to County Administrator and Rebecca Owens, Director of Finance) Page 2 of 5 3. Request to transfer funds in the amount of $11,000 from Board Contingency to pay for the employee picnic (P. Jason Peters, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors) F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCE -CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of these items does not indicate support for, or judge the merits of, the requested zoning actions but satisfies procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will be held after recommendation by the Planning Commission.- 1. ommission: 1. The petition of Star City Church of Christ to obtain a Special Use Permit in a C-2, High Intensity Commercial, District for the operation of religious assembly on approximately 1.21 acres, located at 5933 Williamson Road, Hollins Magisterial District 2. The petition of Julie Abernethy, Friendship Apartment Village Corporation, to obtain a Special Use Permit in a C-2CS, High Intensity Commercial, District with conditions and special use permit for outdoor gatherings on approximately 10.51 acres, located at 450 Springbeauty Street and Florist Road, Hollins Magisterial District G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance accepting and appropriating $100,000 from the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) for the purpose of locally administering the improvement of the drainage system at Kenwick Trail, Belle Meade Drive and Merriman Road; Cave Spring Magisterial District (Tarek Moneir, Deputy Director of Development) 2. Ordinance to accept and appropriate $1,000 from the Appalachian Power Company in support of the Catawba Greenway (Lindsay Blankenship, Greenway/Blueway Planner) 3. Ordinance approving the sale of the old Vinton Library to Richard H. Macher and authorizing the execution of a contract of sale (Jill Loope, Director of Economic Development) H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance accepting and appropriating funds in the amount of $8,000 from the U.S. Marine Corps Reserve Unit and the Marine Corps League to Camp Roanoke from the 20th Annual Marine Mud Run (Doug Blount, Director of Parks, Recreation and Tourism) I. APPOINTMENTS 1. Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) (appointed by District) 2. Budget and Fiscal Affairs Committee (BFAC) (appointed by District and At Large) Page 3 of 5 3. Clean Valley Council (At Large) 4. Economic Development Authority (EDA) (appointed by District) J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY 1. Approval of minutes - February 23, 2016 2. Request to accept and allocate funds in the amount of $2,736 to the Clerk of the Circuit Court from the Commonwealth of Virginia, for fiscal year 2015/2016 3. Confirmation of the appointment of Gregory Hamilton (At -Large) to the Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare Board of Directors 4. Request to accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $7,082 from the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services Virginia Victim -Witness Fund, federal Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) to the Commonwealth Attorney's Office 5. Resolution granting a waiver to the American Cancer Society and Relay for Life of Vinton under Section 13-23 of the Roanoke County Code to the provisions of the County's Noise Ordinance, Article II. Noise of Chapter 13. Offenses - Miscellaneous, Vinton Magisterial District 6. Confirmation of appointments to the Building Code Board of Appeals (Fire Code Board of Appeals) (At -Large) K. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS L. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Reserves 3. Reserve for Board Contingency 4. Outstanding Debt 5. Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Revenues as of March 31, 2016 Page 4 of 5 6. Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Expenditures and Encumbrances as of March 31, 2016 7. Accounts Paid — March 31, 2016 8. Treasurer's Statement of Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy as of March 31, 2016 M. WORK SESSIONS 1. Work session to review with the Board of Supervisors the proposed fiscal year 2017-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and proposed fiscal year 2016- 2017 Debt Service Fund (Rebecca Owens, Director of Finance; Christopher Bever, Director of Management and Budget) N. CLOSED MEETING, pursuant to the Code of Virginia as follows: 1. Section 2.2-3711.A.1 Personnel, namely discussion concerning appointment to the Western Virginia Water Authority EVENING SESSION O. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION P. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OR ORDINANCES 1. The petition of David B. McClure, Apex Towers, LLC to obtain a Special Use Permit for a broadcasting tower (cell tower) approximately 154 feet in height in a 1-2, High Intensity Industrial, District on approximately 4.58 acres, located at 5119 Hollins Road, Hollins Magisterial District (Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning) Q. CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS R. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 1. Joseph P. McNamara 2. George G. Assaid 3. Al Bedrosian 4. Martha B. Hooker 5. P. Jason Peters S. ADJOURNMENT Page 5 of 5 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. E.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: April 26, 2016 Request to approve the Cable Television budget for fiscal year 2016-2017 Rebecca Owens Director of Finance Thomas C. Gates County Administrator Approval of the Cable Television Budget for fiscal year 2016-2017 BACKGROUND: Roanoke Valley Television, RVTV-3, serves Roanoke County, Roanoke City, the Town of Vinton and their respective school systems. RVTV-3 was created in 1992 as an agreement between the three localities to form a Government and Educational Access Station. The station is located at the Jefferson Center, and is staffed by five, full-time staff members. RVTV-3 produces original video productions, monthly television shows, and covers live government meetings. Programming is cablecast on Cox Communications, Channel 3, and Comcast, Channel 3 in the West County area. RVTV-3 is governed by the Roanoke Valley Regional Cable Television Committee, which includes representatives from the County, the City and the Town. Mr. Jason Peters represents the Board of Supervisors, Ms. Amy Whittaker represents Roanoke County Administration and Mr. David Jones is the Member at Large. The operational budget for RVTV is provided by the three local governments, and is funded through the Virginia Communications Sales and Use Tax paid by Cox Communications. The budget amount paid by each locality is based on the proportion of Cox customers located in each jurisdiction. Roanoke County's share of the cable budget is 43.61 %. RVTV-3 staff are included in the County's payroll and benefit system. Page 1 of 2 DISCUSSION: Last year, Roanoke Valley Television produced a total of 165 video productions for the three localities and their school systems. RVTV produced the following for the County: (32) Half Hour Television Shows, (31) Stand Alone Video Productions, and (22) Live Board Meetings. An entire list of video productions is included in the Budget Packet. RVTV monthly television shows include: "Roanoke County Today," and "Accent Excellence." RVTV also produces two quarterly TV shows, "Roanoke County Business Partners," & "Recreation Television." RVTV-3 programming is uploaded to the RVTV website and social media sources. Additionally, RVTV-3 programming is posted to the websites and social media sources for Roanoke County, Roanoke City, Town of Vinton and their School Systems. The fiscal year 2016-2017 total Operating Budget for RVTV is $401,044. Roanoke County's share is based on the proportion of Cox customers located in each jurisdiction. Roanoke County's share of the cable budget is 43.61 %. FISCAL IMPACT: Roanoke County's share of the cable budget for 2016-2017 is $174,895. This is an increase of $1,514 over the prior year. RVTV's 2016-2017 budget as proposed is $864 higher than the amount included in the County Administrator's Fiscal year 2017 Proposed Operating Budget. The County Administrator will make a technical correction to the budget prior to Board adoption. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Roanoke Valley Regional Cable Television Committee recommends approval of the fiscal year 2016-2017 RVTV Operating Budget. Page 2 of 2 To: Roanoke Regional Cable Television Committee From: Elaine Bays -Murphy, Director of Cable Access Date: April 6, 2016 Re: FY 2016-2017 Operating Budget Proposal BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Roanoke Valley Television, RVTV Channel 3, is a Government & Educational Access Station, serving the City of Roanoke, Roanoke County, the Town of Vinton and their respective school systems. RVTV-3 was created in 1992 as an agreement between the three localities to form a Government & Educational Access Station. The operational budget for RVTV is provided by the three local governments, and it is funded through the Virginia Communications Sales and Use Tax Revenue paid by Cox Communications. The RVTV budget amount paid by each locality is based on the proportion of Cox Customers located in each jurisdiction. RVTV has five full-time staff members. RVTV-3 produces Original Videos, Monthly Television Shows, and covers LIVE Government Meetings. Roanoke Valley Television produced the following in 2015: • 80 Original Television Shows (12) Inside Roanoke, (12) Roanoke County Today, (12) Spotlight On City Schools, (12) Accent Excellence, (4) Roanoke County Business Partners, (4) Recreation Television, (12) BizRoanoke (12) Libraries Happenings • 58 Regular Government Meetings (24) Regular Roanoke City Council, (22) Regular Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, (12) City Council Briefings • 85 Original Video Productions ( List of Video Productions on Attachment Pages 4 & 5) The approximate rate for video production work in the private sector is $1,500 per finished minute. The approximate RVTV Production Value for Stand Alone Video Productions is $1,974,000. (Total value does not include TV Shows or Government Meetings). RVTV-3 Programming is uploaded to the RVTV Website & Social Media Sources. Additionally, RVTV-3 Programming is uploaded to the Websites & Social Media Sources for Roanoke City, Roanoke County, Town of Vinton & their School Systems. RVTV Website www.rvtv.org RVTV YouTube Channel www.youtube.com/RoanokeValleyTV RVTV Facebook Page www.facebook.com/roanokevalleytelevision RVTV Twitter www.twitter.com/RoanokeValleTV FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed FY2016/2017 Operating Budget request is $401,044. The proposed budget includes a 2% salary increase if approved by the Board of Supervisors. The budget includes closed captioning services for Roanoke City Council & Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meetings. On January 1, 2007, the Virginia Communications Sales and Use Tax Act of 2006 (Va. Code 58.1-645 et seq.) required Cox Communications, as well as other cable television providers, to pay a five percent (5%) sales or use tax to the Commonwealth of Virginia in place of paying franchise fees to the localities, including the City of Roanoke, County of Roanoke, and Town of Vinton. Under the Act, the Commonwealth pays the amount of revenues it receives from cable television providers, like Cox, to the localities. The operational budget for RVTV is provided by the three local governments, and it is funded through the Virginia Communications Sales and Use Tax Revenue paid by Cox Communications. The RVTV budget amount paid by each locality is based on the proportion of Cox Customers located in each jurisdiction. Cox calculates the percentage of Subscribers (December 31, 2015) in each locality as follows: Locality 2015 Percentage 2014 Percentage City 52.17% 52% County 43.61% 44% Vinton 4.22% 4% Based on the above percentages, each member's contribution to the FY2016/2017 budget of $401,044 is: Locality 2015/2016 Budget 2016/2017 Budget City $204,904 $209,225 County $173,381 $174,895 Vinton $15,762 $16,924 Total $394,047 $401,044 *In addition to the City's share of the above budget of $401,044, the City will also pay $2,136 for closed captioning for City Council Briefings. RVTV Financial Report Current Account Balances as of December 31, 2015 273200 (Operating Budget).................................................................$200,548.86 (49.11%) 273450 ( Cox Cable Capital Equipment Grant)....................................$981,237.74 273500 (Operating Surplus).................................................................$51,952.07 ($15,000 Minimum Balance to be maintained in the account) Account 273500 (Operating Surplus) represents the unused funds from the Operating Budget since 1992. RVTV does not lose these funds at the end of the fiscal year, rather they are rolled over into this savings account. 2 ATTACHMENTS: RVTV Proposed 2016 — 2017 Budget 2300 Group Health Insurance Budget Proposed Budget Group Dental Insurance 2,248.00 2015-2016 2016-2017 1010 Regular (Actual 214,431 + 2%) 213,384.00 218,720.00 1011 Longevity Pay 608.00 600.00 2100 FICA (7.65%) 16,324.00 16,732.00 2200 Retirement - VRS (11.18%) 23,728.00 24,453.00 2202 Deferred Comp Match (650 x 4) 1,950.00 2,600.00 2300 Group Health Insurance 40,570.00 2310 Group Dental Insurance 2,248.00 2400 VRS Life (1.31%) 2,817.00 2500 LTD Insurance ( 2%) 678.00 2750 VRS Health Credit (0.30%) 608.00 3013 Professional Services - Other 22,526.00 (Closed Captioning $22,918 Security System $276) 3013A CC - City Council Briefings 3204 Repairs Vehicles (By Garage) 300.00 3209 Repairs (Other Equipment) 1,000.00 3305 Maintenance Service Contracts 3,125.00 (Telephone $550 Website $2,575) 5210 Postage 50.00 5230 Telephone 4,230.00 5233 Internet & Adobe Cloud 1,990.00 5235 Cellular Phones (2 Smart Phones) 1,200.00 5305 Motor Vehicle Insurance 1,342.00 5308 General Liability Insurance 3,187.00 5420 Lease/Rent of Buildings 45,132.00 (8 x $3,723.77 4 x $3,835.48) 5501 Travel (Mileage) 100.00 5520 Dinner Meetings & Luncheons 150.00 5801 Dues & Association Membership 308.00 (Public Relations Society of America) 6010 Office Supplies - General 500.00 6013 Small Equipment & Supplies 2,000.00 6014 Video Supplies 3,000.00 6080 Gas, Oil & Grease 1,400.00 6091 Tires,Tubes & Parts 200.00 Total $394,047.00 * City Only 38,942.00 2,249.00 2,472.00 709.00 656.00 23,194.00 300.00 1,000.00 3,125.00 100.00 4,230.00 1,990.00 1,200.00 1,382.00 3,346.00 46,486.00 100.00 150.00 308.00 600.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 1,200.00 200.00 $401,044.00 *In addition to the City's share of the above budget of $401,044, the City will also pay $2,136 for closed captioning for City Council Briefings. RVTV expended 95.86 of the 2014/2015 Budget. 3 RVTV 2015 Edited Video Productions Roanoke City Productions Length Art by Bus Press Conference 10:00 Governor's Industrial Revitalization Funds Press Conference 20:00 Star City Reads Campaign 60:00 Thrasher Dog Park Opening 11:00 ACHIEVE Reading Forum 120:00 Peter Pan Playground Opening 13:00 Roanoke Police — GTO Graduation 10:00 Roanoke Police — Kids Lawfit Video 5:00 Roanoke City Schools — Teacher of the Year Video 13:00 Read & Feed Press Conference 24:00 Sheriff's Office — Court Security Division 7:30 Roanoke River Greenway Opening 22:00 Single Stream Recycling Press Conference 16:30 Roanoke Youth Summit PSA .30 Roanoke Youth Summit Highlight Video 3:00 State of the City Address 30:00 Human Resources Customer Service Training 16:00 Sheriff's Office — Support Services Division 8:00 Lead Safe Roanoke PSA :30 Library Summer Reading Entry 3:30 Roanoke Leaf Collection PSA .30 Roanoke Recycling Heroes 1:30 New Greenway Bridge at Valley View Mall 10:30 Annual Meeting RVCVB 50:00 ROA's Elmwood on Ice Press Conference 7:00 Veteran Homelessness Press Conference 13:00 City Neighborhoods Awards Celebration 45:00 Grand Re -Opening Municipal North 13:00 Updated Snow Removal 4:00 Roanoke Fire Protection Classification Announcement 15:00 RCPS — McGlothlin Award for Excellence 20:00 Friendship City Agreement — Lijiang City 30:00 Roanoke County Productions Length Spring Book Sale PSA :30 Blue Ridge Kite Festival PSA :30 Apptech Solutions Expansion 14:00 Roanoke County Employee Recruitment 3:00 Roanoke County Police Open House 11:00 New Fire Chief Announcement 15:00 South County Library Passport PSA :30 Neighborhood Concerns App PSA :30 Roanoke County Police 25th Anniversary 20:00 Explore Park Master Plan Community Meetings PSA :30 Friends of the Library Book Sale PSA .30 Roanoke County Productions Length Community Outreach Summit PSA :30 Lions Quest Skills for Growing — County Schools 6:00 New County Attorney Announcement 5:30 (5) Heroin Addiction PSAs .30 each Site Selector Web Application 6:00 State of the County Address 40:00 Annual Christmas Tree Lighting :30 2015 Investiture Ceremony 60:00 WFXR-Fox Ribbon -Cutting & Open House 15:00 Community Strategic Plan PSA :30 Community Strategic Plan Interview 5:00 Tons of Fun PSA :30 Town of Vinton Productions Length Magnets USA Grand Opening 15:00 Vinton Seniors Center PSA :30 Yd Street Dumpster Closing PSA :30 Arbor Day Celebration 13:30 Vinton Fire & EMS — Enhanced Fire Services & Renovation 23:00 Tinker Creek Canoe Launch Ribbon -Cutting 17:00 Gladetown, Carline, Midway Tri -Community Reunion 5:30 HIVE Ribbon -Cutting Ceremony 6:00 Vinton Farmers Market PSA :30 Vinton Branch Library Dedication 30:00 State of the Town Address 25:00 Advancement Foundation Grant Award — Small Business 14:00 Vinton Dogwood Festival PSA :30 City, County, & Town Productions Length (5) Stormwater PSAs :30 each Vietnam War 501h Anniversary Event PSA :30 Vietnam War 501h Anniversary — Opening Ceremony 30:00 (6) RCACP Adoptable Pets Video 2:30 each City & County Production Length Anti -Litter Phase 2 Press Conference 11:00 Total Minutes Produced 1,316 2015 Video Productions (Does not include Shows or Meetings) Productions City of Roanoke Roanoke County Town of Vinton 85 37 31 17 Percentage 44% 36% 20% 5 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. E.2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: April 26, 2016 Resolution approving the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority (RVRA) budget for fiscal year 2016-2017 Rebecca Owens Director of Finance Thomas C. Gates County Administrator Approval of the 2016-2017 budget for the Roanoke Valley Resources Authority BACKGROUND: The Roanoke Valley Resource Authority (RVRA) was established on October 23, 1991 as a tax exempt political subdivision within the Commonwealth of Virginia to acquire and construct a regional sanitary landfill and waste collection and transfer station with related treatment facilities. The charter members are the City of Roanoke, County of Roanoke and Town of Vinton. As specified in the RVRA's Member Use Agreement, all charter members must approve the budget for it to be approved. On March 23, 2016, the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority (RVRA) Board adopted an operating budget for the fiscal year 2016-2017. DISCUSSION: The attached approved budget totals $8,338,292 and represents a decrease of $186,882 or -2.2% from the fiscal year 2015-2016 budget. The budget includes a $0.50 increase per ton in the disposal fee for both municipal and private haulers. This fee increase will reduce the reliance on the contingency reserve fund to balance the budget. The budget utilizes $50,509 of the contingency reserve fund Page 1 of 3 to balance the budget as compared to last year of $434,974. Below are highlights of the proposed 2016-2017 budget: Revenues o Increase of $0.50 per ton in the Municipal and Commercial waste tipping fee rates o Disposal fee revenue is projected to increase $191,150 primarily due to a projected increase in commercial /private tonnages while the municipal tonnages have declined. Expenses Personnel: o Personnel budget is $2,152,723, which is a decrease of approximately $30,504 o Salary increases an average 2% increase for all pay classifications o Health increases of 11.8% and Dental increases of 2.3% o Retiree other post -employment benefits liability is decreased $51,434 Operating: o Operating budget is $4,055,569 o Overall operating budget is decreased $161,378. This decrease is primarily due to reduced transportation costs associated with transporting solid waste (- $134,946) and lower fuel costs (-$80,000). Minor increases in various line items result in the net reduction of $161,378. Capital: o Capital budget is $30,000 o Overall capital budget is increased $5,000 o Capital budget for 2016-2017 includes communications equipment upgrade and small building for Residential Service Area. Reserves: o Reserves are budgeted at $2,100,000 with no increase. The Authority has reserve policies and this increase is in keeping with the policies. Dan Miles, Chief Executive Officer of the RVRA, will be at the meeting to present the budget request. FISCAL IMPACT: The Roanoke Valley Resource Authority budget will impact the County in several ways: Page 2 of 3 1. Tipping fees will increase by $0.50 in the proposed budget. Roanoke County tonnages have decreased resulting in a budgeted reduction of $91,406 in the 2016-2017 General Fund -Solid Waste budget. 2. The County will continue to receive a municipality fee of $300,000 annually from the RVRA to compensate for the siting of the landfill within the County. 3. The County will receive payment of $54,090 during the fiscal year 2016-2017 for providing accounting services. All of the above impacts are included in the fiscal year 2016-2017 proposed County budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adopting the attached resolution approving the operating budget of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority for the fiscal year 2016-2017. Page 3 of 3 ROANOK E VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY 2016-17 'IDDUDGE SMITH H[ GAP FLARE Roanoke Valley Resource Authority TABLE Off' CONTENTS Budget Summary Revenues Administrative Transfer Station Smith Gap Totals Classification Employee by Location Reserves Tipping Fees Breakdown Rutrough Road Landfill 2016-2017 BUDGET Roanoke Valley Resource Authority SUMMARY REVENUE 2016-2017 Disposal Fees $ 8,172,350 Interest Income $ 50,000 Transfer from Contingency Reserve Fund $ 50,509 Sale of Recyclable Material $ 33,933 Miscellaneous - Mulch/ Carbon Sales $ 31,500 Transfer - Rutrough Road $ - Total $ 8,338,292 EXPENSES Personnel $ - Transfer Station $ Administrative $ 669,840 1,540,300 Transfer Station $ 720,474 Totals Administrative Smith Gap $ 762,410 Totals 3,581,415 Smith Gap $ 2,152,723 Operating Total $ 8,338,292 Administrative $ 425,055 1 Transfer Station $ 2,291,241 Smith Gap $ 1,339,273 Totals $ 4,055,569 Capital Administrative $ - Transfer Station $ 10,000 Smith Gap $ 20,000 Totals $ 30,000 Reserves Administrative $ - Transfer Station $ 559,700 Smith Gap $ 1,540,300 Totals $ 2,100,000 Totals Administrative $ 1,094,894 Transfer Station $ 3,581,415 Smith Gap $ 3,661,983 Total $ 8,338,292 2016-2017 BUDGET 1 Roanoke Valley Resource Authority REVENUE SUNINIARY 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Disposal Fees $ 7,594,400 $ 7,326,600 $ 7,729,480 $ 7,932,050 $ 7,981,200 $ 8,172,350 Interest Income $ 45,000 $ 28,000 $ 28,000 $ 32,000 $ 35,000 $ 50,000 Transfer from Contingency $ 1,596,087 $ 490,991 $ 405,405 $ 456,323 $ 434,974 $ 50,509 Reserve Fund Sale of Recyclable $ 50,600 $ 55,000 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 38,000 $ 33,933 Material Miscellaneous - Mulch sale., $ 59,800 $ 39,450 $ 39,450 $ 46,830 $ 36,000 $ 31,500 Transfer - Rutrough Road $ 125,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 9,470,887 $ 7,940,041 $ 8,237,335 $ 8,502,203 $ 8,525,174 $ 8,338,292 EXPENSES Personnel $ 1,863,655 $ 1,972,540 $ 2,004,856 $ 2,126,647 $ 2,183,227 $ 2,152,723 Operating $ 3,828,652 $ 3,995,501 $ 4,118,479 $ 4,260,556 $ 4,216,947 $ 4,055,569 Capital $ - $ 12,000 $ 14,000 $ 15,000 $ 25,000 $ 30,000 Transfer to Reserves $ 1,010,000 $ 1,960,000 $ 2,100,000 $ 2,100,000 $ 2,100,000 $ 2,100,000 Debt Service $ 2,768,580 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 9,470,887 $ 7,940,041 $ 8,237,335 $ 8,502,203 $ 8,525,174 $ 8,338,292 DISPOSAL FEES Municipal $ per ton 45 45 47 48 49 49.5 Private $ per ton 55 55 57 58 59 59.5 % INCREASE -3.6% -16.2% 3.7% 3.2% 0.3% -2.2% in expenses 2016-2017 BUDGET 2 Roanoke Valley Resource Authority REVENUES CODE DESCRIPTION FY15-16 FY16-17 JUSTIFICATION 493 Total Tipping Fees $7,981,200 $ 8,172,350 Based on tonnage receipts of : 154,360 Municipal 81,560 tons $ 3,989,700 Commercial 41,900 tons $ 2,486,250 Private 22,100 tons $ 1,276,000 Residential 8,800 tons $ 420,400 Total $ 8,172,350 401 Interest Income $ 35,000 $ 50,000 Operating & Other Reserve $ 50,000 956 Transfer from Contingency $ 434,974 $ 50,509 Funds available from Contingency Reserve Reserve Fund 460 Sale of Recyclable $ 38,000 $ 33,933 Sale of Recyclable Scrap Material Metal & Miscellaneous 515 Miscellaneous $ 36,000 $ 31,500 Mulch Sales $ 31,500 Revenue 976 Transfer from $ - $ - Transfer to operating budget Rutrough Road Fund for administrative Services TOTAL REVENUE $8,525,174 $ 8,338,292 P41 i0041SV/H1119101VIN TIPPING FEES CODE DESCRIPTION FY15-16 FY16-17 JUSTIFICATION 451 City of Roanoke $1,993,800 $1,965,900 Municipal Waste 38,000 tons @ 49.5 $1,881,000 Wood Waste 2,200 tons @ 35 $ 77,000 Tires 45 tons @ 120 $ 5,400 500 mixed @ 5 $ 2,500 City of Roanoke Total $ 1,965,900 452 County of Roanoke $1,881,400 $1,859,900 Municipal Waste 36,000 tons @ 49.5 $1,782,000 Wood Waste 1,900 tons @ 35 $ 66,500 Tires 70 tons @ 120 $ 8,400 600 mixed @ 5 $ 3,000 County of Roanoke Total $ 1,859,900 453 Town of Vinton $169,300 $ 163,900 Municipal Waste 3,200 tons @ 49.5 $ 158,400 Wood Waste 140 tons @ 35 $ 4,900 Tires 5 tons @ 120 $ 600 - mixed @ 5 $ - Town of Vinton Total $ 163,900 458 Commercial $2,290,100 $ 2,486,250 Commercial Waste 41,500 tons @ 59.5 $ 2,469,250 Wood Waste 400 tons @ 35 $ 14,000 Tires - tons @ 120 $ - 600 mixed @ 5 $ 3,000 Commercial Total $ 2,486,250 P411 09, 411 V/ 131119101 VAN TIPPING FEES CODE DESCRIPTION FY15-16 FY16-17 JUSTIFICATION 459 Private $1,230,100 $1,276,000 Private Waste 20,000 tons @ 59.5 $1,190,000 Wood Waste 2,000 tons @ 35 $ 70,000 Tires 100 tons @ 120 $ 12,000 800 mixed @ 5 $ 4,000 Private Total $ 1,276,000 463 Residential $416,500 $ 420,400 Residential Waste Based on Uniform Disposal Allocation City of Roanoke 53.5% $ 224,914 County of Roanoke 41.2% $ 173,205 Town of Vinton 5.3% $ 22,281 Household 7,200 Tons @ $49.5 $ 356,400 Wood waste 1,600 Tons @ $35 $ 56,000 Tires 1,600 Tires @ $5 $ 8,000 Residential Total $ 420,400 TOTAL TIPPING FEE $7,981,200 $ 8,172,350 2016-2017 BUDGET ONNEL )N lidays intenance art time iployees $ 1,044,400 iployees iployees $ 100,400 iployees $ 42,289 iployees $ 250,531 .8% Annual $ $ 71,132 $ 12,000 $ 24,570 $ 40,179 $ 6,436 $ 13,500 4 per month iployees $1,395,332 iployees $ 42,289 tys 50% $2,782 lys 100% iployees iployees $1,395,332 2016-2017 BUDGET [LiliaiskllpjLvilitLii DN Holidays Maintenance n )art time 1ployees $ 437,864 1ployees 1ployees $ - 1ployees $ - 1ployees $ 48,186 .8% Annual $ $ 8,494 $ 12,000 $ 5,718 $ 7,124 $ 3,338 $ 3,500 4 per month 1ployees $ 486,050 1ployees $ - gays 50% $941 )ays 100% 1ployees 1ployees $ 486,050 2016-2017 BUDGET -)lNINIt 15 DN Holidays Maintenance 1 )art time iployees $ 270,871 iployees iployees $ 32,354 iployees $ 42,289 iployees $ 101,120 .8% Annual $ $ 22,353 $ 11,435 $ 15,528 $ 3,098 $ 7,000 4 per month iployees $ 404,345 iployees $ 42,289 gays 50% $864 )ays 100% iployees iployees $ 404,345 2016-2017 BUDGET )-N-N t 5U DN -folidays Maintenance L Part time Zployees $ 335,665 1ployees Zployees $ 68,047 Zployees $ - Zployees $ 101,225 .8% Annual $ $ 40,285 $ 7,418 $ 17,528 $ 3,000 4 per month Zployees $ 504,936 1ployees $ - rays 50% $977 Pays 100% Zployees Zployees $ 504,936 2016-2017 BUDGET Roanoke Valley Resource Authority PERSONNEL TOTALS CODE DESCRIPTION FY16-17 ADMIN TRANSFER LANDFILL 1010 Salaries $ 1,437,621 $ 486,050 $ 446,634 $ 504,936 1015 Overtime $ 60,000 $ - $ 38,000 $ 22,000 1020 Part - time $ 35,000 $ - $ 35,000 $ - 1116 Supplements $ - $ - $ - $ - 2100 F.I.C.A. $ 117,245 $ 37,183 $ 39,752 $ 40,311 2200 Retirement - VRS $ 125,850 $ 52,763 $ 32,640 $ 40,448 2202 Deferred Comp. Match $ 18,850 $ 3,250 $ 7,150 $ 8,450 2203 Retirement - VRS Plan 2 $ 12,098 $ - $ 3,899 $ 8,200 2204 Retirement - City $ 6,614 $ - $ 6,614 $ - 2205 Retirement - VRS Hybrid $ 30,189 $ 5,806 $ 12,185 $ 12,198 2300 Hospitalization $ 186,027 $ 44,500 $ 65,598 $ 75,928 2310 Dental $ 11,829 $ 2,039 $ 4,487 $ 5,302 2400 Life Insurance - VRS $ 18,279 $ 6,367 $ 5,297 $ 6,615 2401 Life Insurance - City $ 588 $ - $ 588 $ - 2500 Long Term Disability Ins. $ 2,782 $ 941 $ 864 $ 977 2510 Short Term Disability Ins. $ 1,500 $ 259 $ 569 $ 672 2700 Workers' Comp. Ins. $ 44,000 $ 867 $ 13,500 $ 29,633 2750 Retirement Health Insurance Credit $ 4,186 $ 1,458 $ 1,213 $ 1,515 2800 Termination Pay $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ - $ - 2810 Cash -in FLP $ 28,000 $ 18,000 $ 5,700 $ 4,300 2830 Employee Benefits $ 2,066 $ 356 $ 784 $ 926 TOTAL PERSONNEL $ 2,152,723 $ 669,840 $ 720,474 $ 762,410 2016-2017 BUDGET 10 Roanoke Valley Resource Authority I PERSONNEL POSITION # GRADE CURRENT PAY RANGE CEO 1 U Unclassified Operations Manager 1 37 $ 75,897 to $ 120,676 Environmental & Safety Manager 1 34 $ 62,441 to $ 99,281 Business Manager 1 30 $ 53,939 to $ 85,763 Operations Supervisor 2 27 $ 46,594 to $ 74,084 Administrative Coodinator 1 25 $ 42,263 to $ 67,198 Senior Equipment Operator 2 23 $ 38,333 to $ 60,949 Business Supervisor 1 22 $ 36,508 to $ 58,048 Building Maintenance Mechanic 1 21 $ 34,769 to $ 55,283 Motor Equipment Mechanic 2 21 $ 34,769 to $ 55,283 Motor Equipment Operator II 14 19 $ 31,537 to $ 50,144 Motor Equipment Operator I 1 17 $ 28,605 to $ 45,482 Scale Operator 1 16 $ 27,243 to $ 43,316 Laborer/ Operator 0 13 $ 23,533 to $ 37,417 TOTAL SALARIES Adjustments: Market Performance TOTAL ADJUSTED SALARIES 29 $ 1,393,827 6/30/2016 0.00% $ - 2.00% mid -point $ 29,794 $ 1,489,685 Supplements - Outstanding Performance $ 14,000 Total $ 43,794 $ 1,437,621 2016 - 2017 BUDGET 11 Roanoke Valley Resource Authority PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE BY LOCATION POSITION # GRADE ADMIN. TRANSFER LANDFILL CEO 1 U 1 0 0 Operations Manager 1 37 1 0 0 Environmental & Safety Manager 1 34 1 0 0 Business Manager 1 30 1 0 0 Operations Supervisor 2 27 0 1 1 Administrative Coordinator 1 25 1 0 0 Senior Equipment Operator 2 23 0 1 1 Business Supervisor 1 22 0 1 0 Building Maintenance Mechanic 1 21 0 1 0 Motor Equipment Mechanic 2 21 0 0 2 Motor Equipment Operator II 14 19 0 5 9 Motor Equipment Operator I 1 17 0 1 0 Scale Operator 1 16 0 1 0 Laborer/ Operator 0 13 0 0 0 TOTAL EMPLOYEES 29 5 11 13 2016 - 2017 BUDGET 12 Roanoke Valley Resource Authority OPERATING CODE DESCRIPTION FY14-15 FY15-16 FY16-17 JUSTIFICATION 3004 Medical Exams $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 Physical exams for new employees; drug and alcohol random testing 3007 Contract Services $ 230,352 $ 264,156 $ 275,276 Employee Assistance Program: $16.28 @ x 29 employees $ 472 Groundwater Monitoring *Drinking Water Sampling 24 @ $621 $ 14,904 *Monitoring Wells 6 wells; 2 events/year $19,000/event = $ 38,000 Stormwater Discharge *Permit Sampling 4 samples $ 24,000 *Lab Cost 4 samples $ 21,000 Gas Monitoring Quarterly @ $1,300 $ 5,200 Monthly @ $1,275 $ 15,300 Title V, e-GGRT, CC & TS $ 24,500 Clean Valley Council 12 months $ 51,000 Landscaping $265/month $ 3,180 Tire Disposal - 250 Tons @ $89.95 + Fuel Surcharge $ 24,000 Copier Rental $560/month $ 6,720 HHW Disposal $ 47,000 3011 Janitorial Service $ 11,700 $ 24,000 $ 24,000 Services for all Facilities $2000/month $ 24,000 3012 Exterminating Services $ 1,200 $ 1,200 $ 1,200 T.S. - $50/month $ 600 S.G. - $50/month $ 600 File & Record Retention 5,000 3013 Professional Services $ 84,400 $ 85,500 $ 96,500 Auditing Services $ 13,500 Legal Services $ 48,500 Engineering $ 20,000 Software support $ 3,500 Outside Legal $ 4,000 Leachate sampling $ 2,000 3029 Municipal Waste $2,003,900 $1,924,380 $1,789,434 N S tons shipped 145,900 62 tons/car = 2,354 5.5% increase 1,800 cars: $803/car $ 1,445,400 554 cars: $621/car $ 344,034 Total $ 1,789,434 2016-2017 BUDGET 13 Roanoke Valley Resource OPERATING CODE DESCRIPTION FY16-17 JUSTIFICATION ADMIN TRANSFER LANDFILL 3004 Medical $ 1,000 Physical exams for new employees; $ 1,000 $ - $ - Exams drug and alcohol random testing 3007 Contract $ 275,276 Employee Assistance Program: Services $16.28 Q x 29 employees $ 472 $ 472 $ - $ - Groundwater Monitoring *Drinking Water Sampling 24 Q $621 $ 14,904 $ - $ - $ 14,904 *Monitoring Wells 6 wells; 2 events/year $19,000/event = $ 38,000 $ - $ - $ 38,000 Stormwater Discharge *Permit Sampling $ 24,000 $ - $ 2,500 $ 21,500 4 samples *Lab Cost 4 samples $ 21,000 $ - $ 750 $ 20,250 Gas Monitoring Quarterly Q $1,300 $ 5,200 $ - $ - $ 5,200 Monthly Q $1,275 $ 15,300 $ 15,300 Title V, e-GGRT, CC & TS $ 24,500 $ 24,500 Clean Valley Council 12 months $ 51,000 $ 51,000 $ - $ - Landscaping $265/month $ 3,180 $ - $ 3,180 $ - Tire Disposal - 250 Tons Q $89.95 + Fuel Surcharge $ 24,000 $ - $ 24,000 $ - Copier Rental $560/month $ 6,720 $ 6,720 $ - $ - HHW Disposal $ 47,000 $ 47,000 3011 Janitorial $ 24,000 Services for all Facilities Service $2000/month $ 24,000 $ - $ 16,800 $ 7,200 3012 Exterminating $ 1,200 T.S. - $50/month $ 600 $ - $ 600 $ - Services S.G. - $50/month $ 600 $ - $ - $ 600 File & Record Retention $ 5,000 $ 5,000 3013 Professional $ 96,500 Auditing Services $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $ - $ - Services Legal Services $ 48,500 $ 48,500 $ - $ - Engineering Services $ 20,000 $ 7,000 $ - $ 13,000 Software support $ 3,500 $ - $ 3,500 $ - Outside Legal $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ - $ - Leachate sampling $ 2,000 $ 2,000 3029 Municipal $1,789,434 N S tons shipped 145,900 Waste 62 tons/ car = 2,354 $ - 1,800 cars: $803/car $ 1,445,400 554 cars: $621/car $ 344,034 $ - Total $ 1,789,434 $ - $1,789,434 $ - 2016-2017 BUDGET 14 FAWN KII I� 15 TION $ 186,300 $620 $ 6,200 is maintenance airs to office equipment airs to all road vehicles airs to [uipment airs to all buildings stations, septic tanks. Lent $ 175,000 $ 15,000 $ 5,000 nent $ 15,000 er, etc. s, cards, scale tickets sing forms insel public hearings, etc. $ 150 $ 400 $ 200 $ 100 PSIS GS►ZIS r/ :��� 9101 No r"VnlC1n t-l� I IN Vj 16 TRANSFER LANDFILL $ - $ 186,300 $ - $ 6,200 s 1,350 S 1,350 $ 45,000 $ 55,000 $ $ $ $ 70,000 - 5,000 10,000 $ $ $ $ 105,000 15,000 - 5,000 S - S - S - $ - 2016-2017 BUDGET ro,rIN,r r, lel I II V 17 ,ATTON pens, s items nctions & on Da ;es, moke ng, ates, miscellaneous $ 27,000 $ 42,000 $ 4,000 $ 30,000 -e for Transfer otge Smith Gap ite cars gal - WV WA Fee $ 21,000 gs and age .general both facilties, credit card processing ice at Smith Gap Landfill !s PSIS UIPWS V/ H-1191!] 0 r C)PT-P ATTNC- 18 IN TRANSFEE LANDFILL 400 $ - $ - 500 $ - $ - 000 $ - $ - - $ 27,000 $ 42,000 - $ 4,000 $ 30,000 - $ 10,000 $ - - $ - $ 21,000 500 $ - $ - 000 $ - $ - 980 $ - $ 5,520 000 $ - $ - 2016-2017 BUDGET CWIP1� A7'TNT C- 19 kTION ngs, contents, vehicles L or VACO pools es & property s Equipment ent !s for RVRA ird Members lodging, SWANA, including meals is; SWANA, VML, gs, dinners, and pith RVRA azardous materials, sous to: $ 300,000 $ 100,000 Ile $ 2,000 2016-2017 BUDGET Roanoke Valley Resource Authority OPERATING CODE DESCRIPTION FY16-17 JUSTIFICATION ADMIN TRANSFER ANDFILL 5302 Property Insurance- $ 28,000 Coverage for all buildings, contents, $ 28,000 $ - $ - Fire and equipment 5305 Motor Vehicle his. $ 8,000 Insurance for on -road vehicles $ 8,000 $ - S - 5307 Public Officials Ins. $ 500 Insurance through VML or VACO pools $ 500 $ - $ - 5308 General Liability Ins. $ 9,000 Coverage for all facilities & property $ 9,000 $ - $ - 5410 Rent of Equipment $ 5,280 Rental of Miscellaneous Equipment $ - $ 2,640 $ 2,640 Heavy Equipment Emergency Equipment 5501 Travel - Mileage $ 500 Use of personal vehicles for RVRA $ 500 $ - $ - business, staff, and Board Members 5503 Travel - Lodging $ 8,500 Out of town conference lodging, $ 7,500 $ 500 S 500 SWANA, VML, legal conferences, including meals 5504 Conference $ 4,000 Conference registrations; SWANA, VML $ 3,500 $ 250 $ 250 legal conferences 5520 Dinner Meetings - $ 3,500 Monthly Board meetings, dinners, and $ 3,500 $ - S - Luncheons luncheons associated with RVRA 5540 Training & Education $ 5,500 Operator training for hazardous $ 5,500 $ - $ - materials, certification, miscellaneous 5601 Contributions $ 402,000 Payments per contract to: $ - $ 100,000 $ 302,000 Roanoke County $ 300,000 Roanoke City $ 100,000 Volunteer fire and rescue $ 2,000 2016-2017 BUDGET 20 21 TION tion dues: IA, ?r annual fees —$38,000 ); CAR CC FEE $11,000 �s [cils, folders, etc. pies p equipment nputers is & medicine caning & sanitation �)ment & Fees and vehicles, tenance parts and lent and vehicles $ 7,100 misc. $ 5,500 $ 8,800 P41S 09, 411 rI :11101!] NO 22 rRANSFEF LANDFILL $ 11,000 $ 38,000 $ 12,100 $ 15,600 $ 250 $ 250 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 90,000 $ 216,000 $ 15,000 $ 47,000 $ 2,750 $ 1,000 $ 3,350 $ $ $ 4,225 1,000 5,450 2016-2017 BUDGET 23 'ATION and manuals id manuals le books ers, salt for roads, ids, seed, mulch seeding slopes, fill miscellaneous ers replacements & ions for both facilities es, etc. itures 1.25% 2016-2017 BUDGET r7r-Y 24 RANSFER LANDFILL - $ - - $ - - $ - 6,500 $ 50,500 1,000 $ 1,000 1,500 $ 1,500 9,000 $ 53,000 2,262,954 $1,322,739 28,287 $ 16,534 2,291,241 $1,339,273 2016-2017 BUDGET Roanoke Valley Resource Authority CODE DESCRIPTION FY15-16 FY16-17 JUSTIFICATION 8101 Machinery & Equipment New $ 15,000 $ 8102 Machinery & Equipment Replacement $ 10,000 $ - 8201 Furniture, Office Equipment New $ - $ - 8202 Furniture, Office Equipment Replacement $ - $ - 8302 Communications Equipment Replacement $ - $ 20,000 Communication upgrade between leachate tanks, water, and flare (SG). 8402 Small Capital Outlay Replacement $ - $ - 8701 Technology Equipment - New $ - $ - 8702 Data Processing Equipment Replacement $ - $ - 8705 Computer Server $ - $ - 8902 New Building $ - $ 10,000 Small Building for Residential Service Area Attendant (TS). TOTAL CAPITAL $ 25,000 $ 30,000 2016-2017 BUDGET 25 Roanoke Valley Resource Authority RESERVES CODE DESCRIPTION BALANCE DEPOSIT EXPENSE BALANCE JUSTIFICATION 7/1/2016 FY16-17 FY16-17 06/30/17 924500 Landfill Closure $ 6,394,470 $ 200,000 $2,000,000 $ 4,594,470 As required by State and Federal Regulations to close Smith Gap Landfill Close 7 Acres 925010 Equipment $ 821,417 $1,000,000 $1,363,000 $ 458,417 For replacement of Reserve Fund equipment per equipment replacement schedule. 925020 Groundwater $ 500,000 S - $ - $ 500,000 Groundwater Protection Fund protection fund per local permit. 925030 Landfill Host $ 179,475 $ 10,000 $ - $ 189,475 As per local permit. Community Intranet/ property Improvement Fund 925040 Property Value $ 384,759 $ - $ - $ 384,759 As per local permit. Protection Current fund is adequate based on anticipated sales. 925050 Future Site $ 3,150,118 $ 500,000 $ 50,000 $ 3,600,118 For future construction Development of the landfill Engineering for Phase VI 925065 Capital $ (21,839) $ 390,000 $ 292,000 $ 76,161 For maintenance and Improvement improvements to the Fund facilities. Lighting, Carpet, and Tile 00840- Contingency $1,476,192 $ - $ 50,509 $ 1,425,683 For unexpected expenses 0929 Reserve and for tipping fee Fund stabilization TOTAL RESERVE $12,884,592 $ 2,100,000 $ 3,755,509 $ 11,229,083 FUNDS 2016-2017 BUDGET 26 1� 1pl�171plATIPI�17 27 ER LANDFILL 000 $ 190,000 700 $ 645,300 - $ 10,000 - $ 500,000 000 $ 195,000 700 $ 1,540,300 2016-2017 BUDGET I7rTTOTOTT� Tom' -T IL IL 28 PERCENT 26% 49% 25% 100% PERCENT 21% 2% 0% 24% ands allow e. 2016-2017 BUDGET RnannkP VallPv RPsnnrrP Anthnrity i&i i i ii II 11111 29 TION ly 1, 2016 �Ctivities me from 2016-2017 BUDGET Roanoke Valley Resource Authority -D TT7F-D C�)TTrl-J -C�) A T�) 30 'ATION ring is $ 42,000 terly $ 6,000 1 $ 18,000 $ 100,000 T l care $ 11,000 Ig $ 44,000 nent $ - $ 10,000 :onstr. $ 1,000,000 $ 93,000 )ne $ 5,000 ewer/ Flare Station �rvices ttled gas. ition and Associated P4100,411V/H1191!]0r D....«..1.,. V..11.._. D,...,... _..,, A..iL--.g Roanoke Valley Resource Authority TABLE OF CONTENTS RESERVE FUNDS PAGE# I. RVRA Financial & Reserve Policy 1-3 II. Annual Review 4 III. Consulting Engineer's Review 5-8 IV. Summary of Reserve Funds A. Ending 2015/2016 9 B. Ten-year Projections 10 V. Reserve Funds and Expenditure Plans 11-34 A. Landfill Closure Fund 11-12 B. Equipment Reserve Fund 13-16 C. Groundwater Protection Fund 17-18 D. Host Community Improvement Fund 19-20 E. Property Value Protection Fund 21-22 F. Further Site Development Fund 23-26 G. Capital Improvement Plan 27-29 H. Roanoke (Rutrough Rd) Regional Landfill 30-31 I. Contingency Fund 33-34 2016-2017 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority RESERVE V1E POLICY ROANOK E VALLEY RESOURCE AlCJ1THORITY FINANCIAL AND RESERVES POUT li I. Background The Authority recognizes one of the keys to sound financial management is the development of a systematic way to fund planned capital projects and on-going maintenance programs. The Authority believes it is equally important to establish the planned expenditures of associated funding for its capital projects and maintenance programs on a pay-as-you-go basis whenever possible. The National Advisory Council on State and Local Budgeting (NACSLB) has issued guidelines representing standards of excellence in governmental budgeting that include the preparation of policies and plans for capital asset acquisition, maintenance, and replacement (Principle 2; Element 5; Practice 5.2). This policy addresses this standard. II. Purpose This policy will provide for the establishment and the planned funding level of maintenance and improvement reserve accounts for planned expenditures over a short-term planning period of five (5) years and a long-term planning period of ten (10+) years or more. Each individual account provides for a separate funding purpose to be designated as either "restricted" or "unrestricted" accounts. Restricted accounts must be used solely for their intended purpose as required by regulatory statute, contractual obligation, or operating permit conditions. Unrestricted funds are intended for planned capital and maintenance purposes, but may be periodically used by the Authority temporarily, for not more than six (6) months, to provide emergency funding for the Authority's operations, if needed. Reserve Accounts may be utilized to fund the same or separate projects as deemed necessary for supporting the mission of providing quality programs and facilities necessary to serve the Authority's Member Communities of Roanoke County, the City of Roanoke, the Town of Vinton and their residents and businesses of the Roanoke Valley. III. Policy Guidelines for Reserve Fund Accounts A. The Authority will maintain reserve accounts and an initial beginning balance of funds will be deposited into accounts as identified for the current fiscal year. B. Annual funding transfers will occur in twelve (12) equal monthly transfers from revenues received by the Authority and as budgeted for the current fiscal year. C. Ongoing expenditures from the funds will occur as budgeted for the current fiscal year as costs are accrued. D. Planned deposits to the funds are calculated sufficient to maintain the desired fund balances with a positive fund balance, at a minimum, for any given fiscal year during the long-term planning period. 2016-2017 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority IV. E. Planned expenditures of the funds are calculated sufficient to provide cash funding for all planned capital projects and maintenance projects for any given fiscal year during the long-term planning period. F. Any end of year operating surplus and/or interest earnings may be allocated to one or more account, as determined by the Authority's Board of Directors. G. An internal review of the account allocations and funding levels by a professional engineer familiar with best management practices of solid waste operations and facilities will occur annually to ensure the priorities are consistent with the goals of the Authority and to ensure the funding levels are adequate. H. An external, third party review of the account allocations and funding levels by a professional engineer, familiar with best management practices of solid waste operations and facilities, will occur every five (5) years to ensure the funding levels are adequate. Account Definitions The Landfill Closure Fund (Unrestricted) provides a reserve for the costs of capping completed areas of the landfill and at the end of the landfill's useful life, to completely close any remaining area, install all monitoring and collection systems and perform all post - closure care activities per regulatory requirements. The Equipment Replacement Fund (Unrestricted) provides funds for the future purchases, regularly scheduled replacement of major operating equipment, and any uninsured risk, in an orderly fashion as to minimize annual operating costs, maximize any trade-in or surplus value, and to provide for the best overall purchasing value. The Ground Water Protection Fund (Restricted) provides funds to address any environmental effects the operation of the landfill may have on the surrounding area. The fund also serves to assist in complying with post closure and corrective action requirements of state and federal financial assurance regulations. The Host Community Fund (Restricted) provides funds for the construction and maintenance of public improvements to Authority property within the Host Community, as requested by the Host Community, and as approved in a formal public improvement plan. The Property Protection Fund (Restricted) provides funds for the one-time payments under the Property Protection Policy to property owners within the Host Community for any actual, realized decline in property values as a result of their relatively close proximity to the Smith Gap Regional Landfill. The Site Development Fund (Unrestricted) provides funds for the construction of subsequent phases of the Smith Gap landfill, as necessary, to provide ongoing landfill disposal capacity. 2016-2017 2 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority RESERVE POLICY The Capital Improvement Fund (Unrestricted) was established to be used for various capital maintenance items and new capital projects anticipated for the ten-year planning period. Projects may be amended as solid waste operations and the industry in general continues to evolve. The Rutrough Road Landfill (RRLF) Post Closure Fund (Restricted) provides funding for the Authority's contractual obligation to provide for the ongoing post closure care of the closed Rutrough Road Landfill. The Contingency Fund (Unrestricted) provides funding to stabilize year-to-year rate adjustments and to provide a source of funding for any unforeseen increases in expenses or decreases in revenue that would otherwise cause a negative balance for the Authority's operating funds. V. Reporting The Treasurer will track reserve account deposits and expenditures on a monthly basis. A monthly report will be sent to the Chief Executive Officer, the Authority's Secretary, which will be included on the Board of Directors' agenda for review at all regularly scheduled meetings. The Treasurer will also ensure that all expenditures have been through the appropriate approval process. The Chief Executive Officer will provide an annual report to the Board of Directors as to the adequacy of the funding levels of each respective reserve account. 2016-2017 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority ANNUAL REVIEW AND RESERVE ]FUNDS ANNUAL REV FEW RVRA RESERVE FUNDS PLAN & REPORT FY 2016 - 2017 The Roanoke Valley Resource Authority reviewed its replacement reserve requirements as outlined per the Authority's "Financial and Reserves Policy" and has determined the adequacy of the funding plan as submitted herein. The Authority, in its review, has defined adequacy to mean that sufficient funding, if funded as scheduled, exists in amounts equivalent to or exceeding the anticipated expenditures during a short-term period (next five subsequent fiscal years) and a long-term period (next ten subsequent fiscal years), with the understanding that certain amounts are to be borrowed, if needed, as indicated in the expenditure plan. The Authority has established the funding and expenditure plan, as outlined in the "Summary of Reserve Funds: 10 -Yr. Planning Period" (p.10.) According to staff's current review, funds are adequate for the immediate short-term planning period. However, additional funding or future borrowing will be needed for the Capital Improvement, Equipment Replacement and the Site Development Reserve Funds for the latter years of the long-term planning period. The Board and staff will need to determine the direction that the Authority will take on future transportation of waste (NS vs Tractor Trailers), Gondolas vs shipping containers, leachate management, and possibly expanding the Authority's Members Use Agreement to include other municipalities and businesses and term of life for the Authority. In addition, with the impending Rutrough Road Account depletion of funds for the post closure care and the subsequent move to the operation budget this reserve account will be depleted and ultimately terminated. The plan is consistent with the needs and obligations of the Authority and has been approved by the Authority's Board of Directors. 2016-2017 4 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority CONSULTING ENGINEERS REVIEW CONSULTING ENGINEERS REVIEW The retirement of all outstanding bond debt in FY 2011 subsequently relieved the Authority of its former financial requirements as previously imposed by the Master Indenture of Trust, including the establishment and funding of certain reserve funds as recorded and reported in the annual report. While no longer obligated to the terms of the Master Indenture of Trust, several previously established reserve funds remain as ongoing obligations to the Authority due to start- up and operating restrictions imposed under the Authority's separate "Landfill, Rail, & Transfer Station Permit Conditions & Operating Policies," including: The Groundwater Protection Fund (formerly known as "The Environmental Fund"); The Host Community Fund, and The Property Protection Fund. Additionally, the Authority is contractually obligated to maintain the post - closure care of the closed Roanoke Landfill (a.k.a. the Rutrough Road Landfill) with funds initially established and designated expressly for this purpose in The Rutrough Road Land Post -Closure Fund. Therefore, these four reserve funds are designated as "Restricted" reserve accounts which must be maintained and adequately funded for their express, respective purposes. Unfortunately, the Rutroygh Road Landfill Post -Closure Fund will be depleted within the short-term planning period and will ultimately transition to the operating budget. As part of its post -bond debt, fiscal responsibility, the Authority recognizes one of the keys to sound financial management is the development of a systematic way to fund planned capital projects and on-going maintenance programs beyond its operating permit and contractual requirements. The Authority believes it is equally important to establish the planned expenditures of associated funding for its capital projects and maintenance programs on a pay-as-you-go basis whenever possible. The National Advisory Council on State and Local Budgeting (NACSLB) has issued guidelines representing standards of excellence in governmental budgeting that include the preparation of policies and plans for capital asset acquisition, maintenance, and replacement 2016-2017 5 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority CONSULTING ENGINEERS REVIEW (Principle 2; Element 5; Practice 5.2). Therefore, the Authority established additional reserve funds for these purposes which are designated as "Unrestricted" reserve accounts since there are no external conditions, other than sound financial management as outlined and approved in the RVRA RESERVES PLAN ("Plan"), requiring their existence and funding levels. Unrestricted Funds include: The Closure Fund; The Equipment Fund; The Site Development Fund; The Capital Improvement Fund; and The Contingency Fund. The Closure, Equipment, and Site Development Funds were previously required under the former Master Indenture of Trust and funding levels were maintained and managed accordingly. The Capital Improvement and Contingency Funds, while not previously required per any outside obligation, were established and recognized as being necessary for sound financial management of the Authority's operations and its facilities. The Authority recognizes that periodically, it may need to add, delete, or amend its unrestricted funds as deemed to be in the best interest of the Authority and its members. All funds required for expenditures are currently available or will be available from future annual deposits or future borrowing. The Plan is consistent with the needs and obligations of the Authority and has been approved by the Authority's Board of Directors. The Roanoke Valley Resource Authority must review, prior to the preparation of its annual budget, the adequacy of the respective amounts of the reserve fund accounts under the current operating conditions, and in comparison with industry standards. In conducting such review, the Authority agrees to consult with and obtain the recommendations of a professional engineer familiar with solid waste services, equipment, and facilities as utilized by the Authority. In accordance with the "Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Financial Policy" (Reserves Policy, Sec.1I1.1-1.) adopted by the Board on February 27, 2012, a professional consulting engineer, external to the Authority, is to review the Plan every five years. That external review was last 2016-2017 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority CONSULTING ENGINEERS REVIEW conducted in FY 2012 in review of the FY 2013 Plan. The next external review is scheduled for FY 2017 for the FY 2018 Plan. If at any time, the Authority, in its sole judgment, determines the amount of any reserve fund is inadequate, the Board will utilize best fiscal practices to attempt to remedy any shortage(s). The Authority annually makes deposits to its reserve funds for funding future planned expenditures. These reserves allow the Authority to establish and project an orderly adjustment of its tipping fee revenues as necessary to prepare for future capital expenditures to coincide with its annual operating costs. Initial projections made in 1992 during the start-up, 20 -year revenue bond issuance established a basis of anticipated costs and revenues for operating the new solid waste disposal system through the bond term. More than two decades of actual operating experience of the Authority's systems has allowed the Authority to delay anticipated increases in tipping fees and offer rates less than originally projected. However, a prolonged downturned economy has significantly affected the Authority's revenues primarily due to an overall reduction of municipal waste flow and a significant reduction in investment earnings. The Authority has been able to maintain rates below those originally projected due to improved operational efficiencies resulting in reduced operating costs and expanded life expectancies of landfill cells which allowed for a restructuring of deposits to some of the reserve funds, most notably The Closure and Site Development Funds, while maintaining adequate funding levels for the short-term planning periods. Each reserve fund has been reviewed for its adequacy to meet the planned expenditures over a short-term period of five years and for an extended, long-term, planning period of ten years. Only one reserve fund (Capital Improvement) shows a slight negative balance during the short-term planning period. The cumulative unrestricted fund balance remains sufficient to cover anticipated 2016-2017 7 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority CONSULTING ENGINEERS REVIEW expenditures by transferring funds between other unrestricted Reserve Funds as needed and if needed. Therefore, all reserve funds have been determined to be adequate for the short-term planning period. The long-term planning period is less than adequate, most notably for the Equipment, Site Development, and Capital Improvement Funds, primarily due to staff's scheduling for the replacement of two gondolas per year starting in 2020-2021. Staff is exploring other options than using the gondolas that may require issuing new debt. The Equipment Fund, Site Development Fund and Capital Fund are marginally funded over the ten-year planning period and will need to be addressed within the next five years. In addition, the Rutrough Road Post Closure care account is projected to be depleted within the next five years and the Board and staff will need to include the funding for the ongoing post closure care of the closed landfill in the annual operating budget. Respectfully Submitted, Daniel D. Miles, P.E. Chief Executive Officer 2016-2017 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority SUMMARY SUMMARY OF RESERVE FUNDS Expenditures for FY 2016 BALANCE AT PLANNED/ACTUAL DEPOSITS BEGINNING EXPENDITURES BALANCE 07/01/15 2015/2016 1 -Jul -2016 (anticipated) CLOSURE FUND' $ 6,244,470 $ 50,000 $ 200,000 $ 6,394,470 EQUIPMENT $ 1,102,833 $ 1,281,416 $ 1,000,000 $ 821,417 ENVIRONMENTAL FUND $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ 500,000 HOST COMMUNITY3 $ 169,475 $ - $ 10,000 $ 179,475 PROPERTY VALUE PROTECTION $ 597,242 $ 212,483 $ - $ 384,759 SITE DEVELOPMENT $ 2,650,118 $ - $ 500,000 $ 3,150,118 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $ 390,151 $ 801,990 $ 390,000 $ (21,839) TOTALS $ 11,654,289 $ 2,345,889 $ 2,100,000 $ 11,408,400 RUTROUGH ROAD LANDFILL $ 1,743,899 $ 490,500 $ 5,000 $ 1,258,399 CONTINGENCY $ 1,911,166 $ 434,974 $ - $ 1,476,192 NOTES: 1 Again, as noted the last couple of years, we have submitted closure plans to DEQ a couple of times to close several acres of the landfill; however, we still do not have approval. We anticipate that VDEQ will approve this FY and work will begin next FY. We may advertise this FY; therefore, a nominal amount of Funds are 2• While we have known cost for fleet vehicles (SUV's), we still need to purchase a mowing tractor and horizontal grinder. 3. The Host Community cap was raised from $150,000 to $250,000 in FY 2014. 4. The Board authorized the purchase of approximatley 50 Acres of land adjacent to Smith Gap Landfill. The " funds from the property value protection program were used. At the end of FY 2015, $812,290 were declared surplus and $200,000 were deposited back into the property protection fund. The remaining surplus funds were placed in the contingency fund. 5 Work was completed on the Transfer Station Roof. We have contracts for the Residential Service Area stormwater and facility improvements. The SWM pond is completed and the faciltiy is under construction and should be completed by March 1, 2016 weather permitting. 2016-2017 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority SUMMARY Summary of Reserve Funds: Ten Year Planning Period Fiscal Year 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Deposits Closure 200 200 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 Equipment 1000 1000 1100 1100 1100 1100 1100 1100 1100 1100 1100 Groundwater Protection 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 Host Community 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Property Protection 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site Development 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Capital Improvement 390 390 190 190 190 190 190 1 190 190 190 190 total 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 1 2100 2100 2100 2100 Expenditures Closure 50 2,000 750 0 0 0 100 3,500 1,200 0 0 Equipment 1,281 1,178 969 1,763 854 1,279 1,035 1,253 1,650 2,254 1,202 Groundwater Protection 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Host Community 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 Property Protection 212 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site Development 0 50 3,450 300 0 0 0 0 300 2,900 2,000 Capitallmprovement 802 292 195 300 150 310 260 620 260 260 260 total 2345 3520 5364 2363 1004 1589 1395 5373 3420 5424 3472 Balances 5 year 10 year Closure 6,394 4,594 4,144 4,444 4,744 5,044 5,244 2,044 1,144 1,444 1,744 Equipment 821 643 774 111 357 178 243 90 -460 -1,614 -1,716 Groundwater Protection 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Host Community 179 189 199 209 219 229 239 249 249 249 249 Property Protection 385 385 385 385 385 385 385 385 385 385 385 Site Development 3,150 3,600 650 850 1,350 1,850 2,350 2,850 3,050 650 -850 Capital Improvement -22 76 71 -39 1 -119 -189 -619 -689 -759 -829 total 11,407 9,987 6,723 6,460 7,556 8,067 8,772 5,499 4,179 855 -517 Summary of Other Reserve Funds: Ten Year Planning Period Fiscal Year 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Deposits Rutrough Road 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Contingency 1911 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Expenditures Rutrough Road 490 1,335 171 175 177 178 182 184 185 190 192 Contingency 435 1 14 101 106 115 128 0 0 0 0 0 Balances 5 year 10 year Rutrough Road 1,258 1 -77 -248 -423 -600 -778 -960 1 -1,144 -1,329 -1,519 -1,711 Contingency 1,476 1,462 1,361 1,255 1,140 1,012 1,012 1,012 1,012 1,012 1,012 Totals 5 year 10 year All Funds 14,141 11,372 1 7,836 1 7,292 8,096 8,301 8,824 5,367 3,862 348 -1,216 Unrestricted Funds 1 5 year 10 year All Funds 1 11,819 10,375 1 7,000 1 6,621 7,592 7,965 8,6607 5,377 4,057 733 -639 2016-2017 10 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority CLOSURE FUND CLOSURE FUND The Closure Fund provides a reserve for the costs of capping completed areas of the Smith Gap Regional Landfill and to install all groundwater and gas monitoring and collection systems per regulatory requirements. For the current planning period, deposits will be made monthly providing a total annual deposit of $200,000 (previously $300,000) based on the landfill's estimated future closure costs as they correspond to the landfill's planned and phased useful life. As noted, deposits may be adjusted based on revised cost estimates and an increase or decrease in the amount of waste received in future years. Portions of Smith Gap Landfill are close to final grade and in accordance with our permit are in the process of being closed. We have entered into a contract with Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. to conduct the design and construction management necessary to complete current closure requirements. Staff is continuing to work with our consultant to determine if a Research and Development (RDD) project would be feasible at the Smith Gap Landfill in lieu of installing a prescriptive, geosynthetic capping system as currently estimated. Again, if approved, the RDD project may prove less costly, more environmentally sound, and a very effective way to close remaining portions of the landfill. The expenditures shown on the attached spreadsheet have not been adjusted pending final approval from VDEQ concerning the RDD project and completion of any demonstration period (normally five years), if required by VDEQ. Staff has completed the installation of landfill gas collection and flaring system to service the currently closed areas of the landfill. Staff executed an agreement in FY 2014 for the beneficial use of the collected landfill gas; however, that company has been unable to negotiate a connection with Craig-Botetourt electrical CO-OP and that project has been down -graded to unlikely to materialize. Funds are adequate for the ten-year planning period. 2016-2017 11 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority CLOSURE ]FUND Landfill Closure Fund FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING BALANCE ANNUAL DEPOSIT EXPENSES ENDING BALANCE USES 1998-99 2,375,000 250,000 0 2,625,000 1999-20 2,625,000 250,000 0 2,875,000 2000-01 2,882,755 250,000 0 3,132,755 2001-02 3,132,755 250,000 0 3,382,755 2002-03 3,382,755 250,000 0 3,632,755 2003-04 3,632,755 250,000 0 3,882,755 2004-05 3,882,755 250,000 0 4,132,755 2005-06 4,132,755 250,000 0 4,382,755 2006-07 4,382,755 250,000 0 4,632,755 2007-08 4,632,755 1,050,000 10,291 5,672,464 Phase Design 2008-09 5,672,464 600,000 29,817 6,242,647 Phase I Design & LFGCCS 2009-10 6,242,647 600,000 72,704 6,769,943 Phase I Design & LFGCCS 2010-11 6,769,943 400,000 1,589,591 5,580,352 Complete LFGCCS 2011-12 5,580,352 100,000 193,600 5,486,752 Misc. LFGCCS & LFGTE 2012-13 5,486,752 300,000 22,500 5,764,252 Closure & Misc LFGCCS 2013-14 5,764,252 300,000 21,915 6,042,337 Misc. LFGCCS 2014-15 6,042,337 300,000 97,867 6,244,470 Engineering & Ad. Closure 2015-16 6,244,470 200,000 50,000 6,394,470 Engineering & Ad. Closure 2016-17 6,394,470 200,000 2,000,000 4,594,470 Phase I Construction (7.0 Ac) 2017-18 4,594,470 300,000 750,000 4,144,470 Phase I Construction (7.0 Ac) 2018-19 4,144,470 300,000 0 4,444,470 2019-20 4,444,470 300,000 0 4,744,470 2020-21 4,744,470 300,000 0 5,044,470 2021-22 5,044,470 300,000 100,000 5,244,470 Phase II Design 2022-23 5,244,470 300,000 3,500,000 2,044,470 Phase II Construction (10 Ac) 2023-24 2,044,470 300,000 1,200,000 1,144,470 Phase II Construction (10 Ac) 2024-25 1,144,470 300,000 0 1,444,470 2025-26 1,444,470 300,000 0 1,744,470 2026-27 1,744,470 2027-28 Note: Additional funding from Surplus ($550,000) was added from FY06/07 budget in FY 07/08 2016-2017 12 RESERVEFUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority EQUIP MENT �Y RESER E FUND FQUIPMENT FUND The Equipment Fund is established to provide funds for the regularly scheduled replacement purchases of major operating equipment. For the current planning period, deposits will be made monthly providing a total annual deposit $1,000,000 (previously $1,100,000). Cost estimates were adjusted significantly in 2011 based on new emission guidelines and additional borrowing or alternate methods of purchasing to include leasing may be required. The Equipment Fund remains underfunded for the long-term planning periods. A recent State Contract has allowed the Authority to purchase certain equipment through the cooperative procurement program at a lower price than previously budgeted. In addition, staff anticipates the Authority's current gondola -based transportation system will be at the end of its life cycle by FY 2020 — 2021 and in need of replacement. The Authority may elect to replace its equipment with an identical transportation system or it may convert to shipping containers. In either case, the total capital costs are expected to be greater than any cash amount the Authority may realistically be able to raise by that time based on current waste quantities and rate projections. Any cash set aside for this need will offset any debt issuance necessary to complete this future funding need. Since the Equipment Fund is already under funded, staff has included the replacement of the Gondolas or shipping containers in the Capital Improvement Fund pending a final decision by the Authority. If the Authority switches to shipping containers, other major modifications to facilities will have to be made. Offsetting operational savings should ultimately result in a pay -back, but the initial debt service payment and the resulting adverse impact on the tipping fees may not be acceptable over the timeframe necessary to achieve the offsetting payback. Currently all equipment expenditures are based on the purchase of new equipment with little or no trade-in value for equipment to be replaced or deleted from service. The Equipment Fund also serves to assist in complying with post -closure requirements of state and federal financial assurance regulations. - 2016-2017 13 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority EQUIPMENT FUND D Equipment Reserve Fund FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING BALANCE ANNUAL DEPOSIT EXPENSES ENDING BALANCE Detailed Schedule 1998-99 2,704,000 375,000 260,000 3,127,939 See Attached 1999-20 3,127,939 375,000 288,289 3,214,650 See Attached 2000-01 3,214,650 375,000 555,535 3,034,115 See Attached 2001-02 3,034,115 375,000 987,595 2,421,520 See Attached 2002-03 2,421,520 375,000 680,098 2,116,422 See Attached 2003-04 2,116,422 400,000 459,327 2,057,095 See Attached 2004-05 2,057,095 400,000 561,464 1,895,631 See Attached 2005-06 1,895,631 400,000 323,589 1,972,042 See Attached 2006-07 1,972,042 400,000 492,652 1,879,390 See Attached 2007-08 1,879,390 674,231 1,280,731 1,272,890 See Attached & note below 2008-09 1,272,890 400,000 1,103,483 569,407 See Attached 2009-10 569,407 600,000 351,088 818,319 See Attached 2010-11 818,319 600,000 625,485 792,834 See Attached 2011-12 792,834 600,000 937,839 454,995 See Attached 2012-13 454,995 1,250,000 651,277 1,053,718 See Attached 2013-14 1,053,718 1,100,000 858,452 1,295,266 See Attached 2014-15 1,295,266 1,100,000 1,292,433 1,102,833 See Attached 2015-16 1,102,833 1,000,000 1,281,416 821,417 See Attached 2016-17 821,417 1,000,000 1,178,090 643,327 See Attached 2017-18 643,327 1,100,000 969,132 774,195 See Attached 2018-19 774,195 1,100,000 1,763,361 110,834 See Attached 2019-20 110,834 1,100,000 853,885 356,949 See Attached 2020-21 356,949 1,100,000 1,278,621 178,328 See Attached 2021-22 178,328 1,100,000 1,035,296 243,032 See Attached 2022-23 243,032 1,100,000 1,253,113 89,919 See Attached 2023-24 89,919 1,100,000 1,649,793 -459,874 See Attached 2024-25 -459,874 1,100,000 2,253,686 -1,613,560 See Attached 2025-26 -1,613,560 1,100,000 1,202,500 -1,716,060 See Attached 2026-27 -1,716,060 2016-2017 ,, „ RESERVE FUNDS LO �o CO N U') O O I i Vi I -oi of - N oo h (0o 00 O MI CO N j O jCD N! os w ' ao 0 rncn 0 r` o v LO j 00 N b9 ! M• I ! j b9 I L - -I- N m LO - O M j 00 O M ! M N rq i ( ! M 00 N O LO ! v�y1 N o 64 64 r EA — _v O N co N n ( O O O r ON ON ! O o 04 K3 w rn oo �1 N o O O LO I O �i r` W Ce) w N M j I I I I ! I o W cq N-. � 00 H •1�, CD W W C-1 69j - �p i rn Mi mo ' r M O ! 0 ri wj M C11 v3, w i ( w j i I j I N OD N 00 00 N I- i I l0 N w to ( L o _L O C 0 C M co ccv 60 00 w j i j j - O M N M N M M 00 M O 00 o M ,-� O W 0 O I- O w m O - O O : O 0 r 0 0 _ 0 0 O( O O O O O d1 O O O O o O O o 61 a1 o O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N) NI N N N N N N N N N N N N� N i ! V Y Y 'NOI 'NO >NII O I 7 j. U > co ' O F 76 ON w 0L6t6 p p -0 N CLE 'OQ a-LaCN E p O Y JM UN m�U) Q OI U V It N U C �N N UN p OJp D M m O# > N N N > OO' LL5 C U 7 U Cl) O O )YN > N (D N M m O ON UNo cNnO N W Nco NN O O M r CoN Lfl; OO I N ECl) O Co >F- Lo LL N N p $$ o v -20 N O p m m f @ U- OI II. N p p O 0 O 0 '., U > Y - U U U 0 0 U 0 U LL' 0 0 WX Q LL Z LL LL. LL LL LO vi 10 CD 0 0 0 0 N o° o000 N C m� o in d L-N I cn n O N N O( N L� 00 ! r-� N m NiL� ! ER cy li c-i ( o o o o 00 �' 00 00 — _ CIO L(7 N N N CD C) CD g g0 N N N �-iiN ( 0 C Nj Clt r N ull Ui U�l v C)ON O d 0 0 � O 0 N j (� N j r" M N N N N EFT ( dn a 2N EF3 H? Ff? .00 (R I rj l i 0i w ` ry iti O� C, t� (W� O N � N O-U!l( N 4r VI �► � 0 - - I ( � - �n _ n N f46)N � W � �I lil In n kf) o N -_- rq ON N l o d c* n In o 00 N ! I O O In' ON O C 0-0 o�0 C7, 1 mI LO V) cc m 00 .14 COr. O �I I m Cal 0 C o m I o o0 U') LO Cl)N iri ori 07) vi O L) ; ( 00 ( ( j W 00 O O m 00 W N m N ! uj N N N '� j i i ! N! I � i � �f3 ( ON � Lr�I LO o o O Cl) 00 N �. j j ER ff3 i Eq I [�-� H [�-� H H [U-)-� F [In-� i H H H i •y [�-� [�-� H H H H I F t i In \0 'D �o �o m__.00 o ! n cr N In �t �to o N 'D o l m In N ( om v o o 0 o 0 rr 0 0 o �', 0 0 l o o 0 0 N;m o rn � o rn rn �i� o 0 0 0 0 o) o rn o 0 0 0 li j �+ N N N N N N N N N N N r-+ N N N N N I N N ( H N N N N I i 'F 1 c •i-1 ! rd J U J Q a _ 04 Q v o? a> Y d_ o o m m _ m m3 o o m �i o) �(� o UI0 o C Z C, t17 Co � N N O c �>p ~, ~ o j O .@ O m = U) q j co t� J J N X X N C9 X m U 9 a?�i U U( LO N - U U) J C 0 (D ' N 0. 0) W W W W Co l• :3 Z O C i O O) d V C\ •H m C d' N (� j C C G C C � d ( J (D a) � (n O —! m L x W O t0 N o j L U m m Y O O N a3 C V T C U_ O O p p i ' W p U� ;HIO- 0 O% S D U, W D li LL ; U LL () 0' W LL vi Roanoke Valley Resource Authority GROUNDWATER NDWATIER GROUNDWATER ER PROTECTION FUND The Groundwater Protection Fund (formerly the Environmental Fund) is established to provide funds, if needed, to address any adverse environmental effects on the surrounding area within the Host Community area that may result from the operation of the Smith Gap Regional Landfill. The fund also serves to assist in complying with post closure and corrective action requirements of state and federal financial assurance regulations. The existing fund balance is $500,000 and is adequate for the immediate five-year planning period as shown. No additional deposits are planned at this time. 2016-2017 17 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority GROUNDWATER RESERVE IFUND Groundwater Reserve Fund FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING BALANCE ANNUAL DEPOSIT EXPENSES ENDING BALANCE USES 1998-99 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Activity 1999-20 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Activity 2000-01 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Activity 2001-02 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Activity 2002-03 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Activity 2003-04 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Activity 2004-05 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Activity 2005-06 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Activity 2006-07 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Activity 2007-08 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Activity 2008-09 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Activity 2009-10 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Activity 2010-11 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Activity 2011-12 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Activity 2012-13 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Planned Uses 2013-14 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Planned Uses 2014-15 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Planned Uses 2015-16 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Planned Uses 2016-17 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Planned Uses 2017-18 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Planned Uses 2018-19 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Planned Uses 2019-20 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Planned Uses 2020-21 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Planned Uses 2021-22 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Planned Uses 2022-23 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Planned Uses 2023-24 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Planned Uses 2024-25 500,000 0 0 500,000 No Planned Uses 2025-26 500,000 0 0 1 500,000 No Planned Uses 2026-27 500,000 2n16-2017 18 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority HOST COMMUNITY HOST COMMUNITY FUND The Host Community Fund is established to fund the construction and/or maintenance of public improvements to Authority property for the benefit of the Host Community which is defined as the area within a 5,000 ft. radius of the Smith Gap Regional Landfill property lines. Funded improvements will be established with input from the Host Community and set out in a public improvement plan. Originally Annual deposits were made in the amount of $10,000 on a monthly basis with the balance not to exceed $150,000. However, the Host Community with assistance from the Authority's staff, increased the limit from $150,000 to $250,000 in FY 2014. The Host Community is exploring its options for the use of the Host Community Fund. Existing and proposed funds are adequate for the immediate five-year planning period as shown. 2016-2.097 19 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority HOST COMMUNITY Host Community Reserve Fund FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING BALANCE ANNUAL DEPOSIT EXPENSES ENDING BALANCE USES 1992-93 0 0 0 0 1993-94 0 8,000 0 8,000 1994-95 8,000 10,000 0 18,000 1995-96 18,000 10,000 0 28,000 1996-97 28,000 10,000 29,385 8,615 Computers ($25,385), F&R ($4,000) 1997-98 8,615 10,000 615 18,000 Playground Equipment 1998-99 18,000 10,000 0 28,000 1999-20 28,000 10,000 0 38,000 2000-01 38,000 10,000 0 48,000 2001-02 48,000 10,000 0 58,000 2002-03 58,000 10,000 0 68,000 2003-04 68,000 10,000 0 78,000 2004-05 78,000 10,000 0 88,000 2005-06 88,000 10,000 0 98,000 2006-07 98,000 10,000 0 108,000 2007-08 108,000 10,000 0 118,000 2008-09 118,000 10,000 0 128,000 2009-10 128,000 10,000 0 138,000 2010-11 138,000 10,000 0 148,000 No Planned Uses 2011-12 148,000 10,000 3,681 154,319 Intranet/property 2012-13 154,319 0 4,319 150,000 Intranet/capped 2013-14 150,000 10,000 525 159,475 No Planned Uses 2014-15 159,475 10,000 0 169,475 No Known Uses 2015-16 169,475 10,000 0 179,475 No Known Uses 2016-17 179,475 10,000 0 189,475 No Known Uses 2017-18 189,475 10,000 0 199,475 No Known Uses 2018-19 199,475 10,000 0 209,475 No Known Uses 2019-20 209,475 10,000 0 219,475 No Known Uses 2020-21 219,475 10,000 0 229,475 No Known Uses 2021-22 229,475 10,000 0 239,475 No Known Uses 2022-23 239,475 10,000 0 249,475 No Known Uses 2023-24 249,475 10,000 10,000 249,475 Misc. Expenses 2024-25 249,475 10,000 10,000 249,475 Misc. Expenses 2025-26 249,475 10,000 10,000 249,475 Misc. Expenses 2016-2017 20 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority PROPERTY ERTY PROTECTION PROPERTY PROTECTION FUND The Property Protection Fund provides funds for payments under the Property Value Protection Policy to property owners within 5,000 feet of the landfill for any actual decline in property values that may be directly attributed to their proximity to the Smith Gap Regional Landfill, as determined and outlined under the Policy. The Property Protection Fund balance of $384,759 is deemed to be sufficient for its intended purpose. Deposits to this fund may also be made from the proceeds of any property purchased and then resold under the terms of the Policy. Existing funds are adequate for the immediate five-year planning period as shown. 2016-2017 21 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority PROPERTY Property Protection Reserve Fund FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING BALANCE ANNUAL DEPOSIT EXPENSES ENDING BALANCE USES 1998-99 504,061 0 1,962 502,099 Crawford , Johnson 1999-20 502,099 0 150 501,949 Appraisal - Brunk 2000-01 501,949 0 0 501,949 None 2001-02 501,949 0 125,317 376,632 Crawford, Johnson 2002-03 376,632 0 697 375,935 Miscellaneous 2003-04 375,935 92,258 25,000 443,193 Sale of Crawford, Markle 2004-05 443,193 0 0 443,193 None 2005-06 443,193 0 0 443,193 None 2006-07 443,193 0 0 443,193 None 2007-08 443,193 0 0 443,193 None 2008-09 443,193 0 0 443,193 None 2009-10 443,193 0 0 443,193 None 2010-11 443,193 0 0 443,193 None 2011-12 443,193 0 0 443,193 None 2012-13 443,193 0 0 443,193 None Projected 2013-14 443,193 0 0 443,193 None Projected 2014-15 443,193 0 45,950 397,243 Sale of 8385 Bradshaw Rd 2015-16 397,243 200,000 212,484 384,759 See Note Below 2016-17 384,759 0 0 384,759 None Projected 2017-18 384,759 0 0 384,759 None Projected 2018-19 384,759 0 0 384,759 None Projected 2019-20 384,759 0 0 384,759 None Projected 2020-21 384,759 0 0 384,759 None Projected 2021-22 384,759 0 0 384,759 None Projected 2022-23 384,759 0 0 384,759 None Projected 2023-24 384,759 0 0 384,759 None Projected 2024-25 384,759 0 0 384,759 None Projected 2025-26 384,759 In FY 2015-2016, RVRA purchased 50 acres contiguous to the landfill although the property was not protected under property protection guidelines. 2016-2017 22 RESERVEFUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority SITE DEVELOPMENT FUND SITE DEVELOPMENT FUND The Site Development Fund provides funds for the construction of subsequent phases of the Smith Gap Regional Landfill cells. For the current planning period, deposits will be made monthly providing a total annual deposit $500,000. Existing funds are adequate for the immediate five-year planning period as shown. Again, Staff has delayed the construction of Phase VI for another year due to operational improvements and some reductions in the quantity of solid waste being accepted and disposed of. The Fund is inadequate for the ten-year planning period and additional deposits to the reserve account or borrowing may be required in the future. The Site Development Fund also serves to assist in complying with post -closure requirements of state and federal financial assurance regulations. 2016-2017 23 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority SITE DEVELOPMENT Site Development Reserve Fund FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING BALANCE ANNUAL DEPOSIT EXPENSES ENDING BALANCE USES 1998-99 3,019,000 500,000 314,000 3,205,000 See Attached 1999-20 3,205,000 500,000 914,591 2,790,409 See Attached 2000-01 2,790,409 500,000 660,033 2,630,376 See Attached 2001-02 2,630,376 500,000 104,491 3,025,885 See Attached 2002-03 3,025,885 500,000 105,973 3,419,912 See Attached 2003-04 3,419,912 500,000 167,375 3,752,537 See Attached 2004-05 3,752,537 500,000 47,057 4,205,480 See Attached 2005-06 4,205,480 500,000 41,582 4,663,898 See Attached 2006-07 4,663,898 500,000 904,313 4,259,585 See Attached 2007-08 4,259,585 1,500,000 4,414,187 1,345,398 See Attached & note below 2008-09 1,345,398 500,000 1,096,295 749,103 See Attached 2009-10 749,103 300,000 98,985 950,118 See Attached 2010-11 950,118 100,000 0 1,050,118 See Attached 2011-12 1,050,118 100,000 0 1,150,118 See Attached 2012-13 1,150,118 500,000 0 1,650,118 See Attached 2013-14 1,650,118 500,000 0 2,150,118 See Attached 2014-15 2,150,118 500,000 0 2,650,118 See Attached 2015-16 2,650,118 500,000 0 3,150,118 See Attached 2016-17 3,150,118 500,000 50,000 3,600,118 See Attached 2017-18 3,600,118 500,000 3,450,000 650,118 See Attached 2018-19 650,118 500,000 300,000 850,118 See Attached 2019-20 850,118 500,000 0 1,350,118 See Attached 2020-21 1,350,118 500,000 0 1,850,118 See Attached 2021-22 1,850,118 500,000 0 2,350,118 See Attached 2022-23 2,350,118 500,000 0 2,850,118 See Attached 2023-24 2,850,118 500,000 300,000 3,050,118 See Attached 2024-25 3,050,118 500,000 2,900,000 650,118 See Attached 2025-26 650,118 500,000 2,000,000 -849,882 See Attached 2026-27 -849,882 0 Notes: 1. An additional deposit of $1,000,000 was added in FY 2007/2008 to this account from FY 06/07 surplus funds. 2016-2017 24 RESERVEFUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority SMITH GAP LANDFILL SITE DEVELOPMENT COSTS FISCAL YEAR ACTIVITY EXPENSES 2014-15 no activity no activity 2015-16 engineering phase 6 liner (7.64ac) $ 50,000 $ 50,000 2016-17 construction phase 6 liner (7.64ac) $ - contruction management $ - engineering phase 6 liner (7.64ac) $ 250,000 2017-18 construction phase 6 liner (7.64ac) $ 2,700,000 $ 3,450,000 contruction management $ 500,000 2018-19 construction phase 6 liner (7.64ac) $ 200,000 $ 300,000 contruction management $ 100,000 2019-20 no activity $ - $ - 2020-21 no activity $ - $ - 2021-22 no activity $ - $ - 2022-23 no activity $ - $ - 2016-2017 25 Reserve Funds Roanoke Valley Resource Authority SITE DEVELOPMENT COSEC'S CONTINUED FISCAL YEAR ACTIVITY EXPENSES engineering phase 7 liner (10.07 ac) $ 300,000 $ 300,000 2023-24 construction phase 7 liner (10.07 ac) $ - contruction management $ - engineering phase 7 liner (10.07 ac) $ - 2024-25 construction phase 7 liner (10.07ac) $ 2,450,000 $ 2,900,000 contruction management $ 450,000 construction phase 7 liner (10.07ac) $ 1,550,000 $ 2,000,000 2025-26 contruction management $ 450,000 2026-27 no activity $ - 2016-2026 TOTAL $ 9,000,000 estimated costs 2016-2026 $ 9,000,000 available funds 7/1/2016 $ 3,150,118 additional funds required $ 5,849,882 deposit years 10 annual deposits required $ 584,988 deposit amount (no borrowing required) $ 400,000 $ (1,849,882) $ 500,000 $ (849,882) $ 600,000 $ 150,118 NOTES Projections based on actual and estimated costs. 2016-2017 Reserve Funds Roanoke Valley Resource Authority CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT E1 Y1LIL:1 V T FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND In FY 2008 - 2009, The Capital Improvement Fund was established by the Authority, outside the Master Indenture of Trust, to be used for various capital maintenance items and new projects anticipated for the short and long-term ten-year planning periods. Examples of the projects include: Concrete floor overlay, re -surfacing all asphalt internal roads and parking lots, replacing the heating and cooling systems, renovation and maintenance of all existing building structures, construction of a residential service area, scale maintenance and possibly a new and additional automated, in -bound scale. Projects may be added or amended as the solid waste operations and industry continues to evolve and funds are available. Previously, the Board authorized an independent Facility Wide Assessment (Report) of the facilities owned and operated by the Resource Authority. The Report identified and prioritized several deficiencies that needed to be addressed and the Board authorized staff to proceed with those high priority projects as soon as possible. Also, as noted in the Report and the Equipment Fund, the Gondolas and/or the shipping container conversion need to be addressed and staff has shown funds for the replacement of the gondolas to start in FY 2021. The Board also authorized staff to proceed with the engineering design sufficient to solicit construction bids for the residential service area in several phases and we are currently completing the first phase now. Staff anticipates that this project will be completed in late FY 2016. Funds are to be expended from this account. Additional funding to complete the project may be required or subsequent phases may have to be revised, delayed or eliminated in order to accommodate any funding shortages. Last year, staff increased the Capital Improvement Plan funding from $190,000 to $390,000, primarily due to address the needs outlined in the Report and for the Residential Service Area. The additional $200,000 came from other reserves (Closure & Equipment) that were deemed adequate for the five-year planning. This increase funding has only been shown for two years and this is the final year of the additional funding. Even with the increase in Funding, the Capital Improvement Fund is marginally adequate for the immediate five-year planning period as shown and inadequate in the long range plan primarily due to the replacement of the Gondola's. The Capital Improvement Fund also serves to assist in complying with post -closure requirements of state and federal financial assurance regulations. 2016-2017 27 RESERVE FUNDS Roanoke Valley Resource Authority CAPITAL Capital Improvement Reserve Fund FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING BALANCE ANNUAL DEPOSIT EXPENSES ENDING BALANCE USES 2008-09 260,000 200,000 0 460,000 No Planned Uses 2009-10 460,000 200,000 21,356 638,644 SG Dust & Od Control 2010-11 638,644 200,000 319,917 518,727 Tipper & TS Floor 2011-12 518,727 200,000 220,271 498,456 Tipper & Hollins Road 2012-13 498,456 100,000 108,900 489,556 Tipper & Roofing 2013-14 489,556 613,407 109,798 993,165 RSA Engring & Dirt, HVAC 2014-15 993,165 190,000 793,014 390,151 RSA & Roofing TS 2015-16 390,151 390,000 801,990 -21,839 RSA 2016-17 -21,839 390,000 292,000 76,161 See Schedule Attached 2017-18 76,161 190,000 195,000 71,161 See Schedule Attached 2018-19 71,161 190,000 300,000 -38,839 See Schedule Attached 2019-20 -38,839 190,000 150,000 1,161 See Schedule Attached 2020-21 1,161 190,000 310,000 -118,839 See Schedule Attached 2021-22 -118,839 190,000 260,000 -188,839 See Schedule Attached 2022-23 -188,839 190,000 620,000 -618,839 See Schedule Attached 2023-24 -618,839 190,000 260,000 -688,839 See Schedule Attached 2024-25 -688,839 190,000 260,000 -758,839 See Schedule Attached 2025-26 -758,839 190,000 $260,000 -828,839 See Schedule Attached 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Notes: Funds ($423,407) from VDOT's purchase of the ROW were deposited in FY 2014 2016-2017 28 RESERVE FUNDS @ C) 0 0 E§ C C G ` § \ \\ \ Cl � & . e e e_ S @ \ \ ƒ \ 5 2 ;m \ w ( _ _ ; ) S 8 / « CD a o ] m \ n Co \ \ � & \ k k \ G R a Cl) a m \ \ § \ \ \ � e _ 0 0 0 0 \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 0 w _ e e e § \ \ § 2 G a _ G G G % G ® / / \ Q \ » @ 2 m (D = @ G 7 2 \ 2 o r r 4 a -° CD ° ^ { @ e e e 2 G G G ° G S % 0 0 o G R R -® � p \ N 2 \ \ � t \ & ) 3 § ƒ / ( \ / / ® 5 / ® f m \ o C w ® ¥ E & $ ) / - ) % ƒ E ( / % 2 J § / k k U) J / k E n \ ) / / : E e ® G / # E J / / } } 4 # 2 L / [ / i § ƒ ) / a ¥ } o k I I 0 0 ® s « o ® $ « \ / § \ k 0 2 } E ƒ f f E \ _\ § ( § % % ) k ( \ ƒ 5 E k 0 \ 0 ± 0 z z 3 0 0 ± w m e m m @ Roanoke Valley Resource Authority RUROUG H[ ROAD RESERVE FUND RUTROUGH ROAD LANDFILL POST -CLOSURE FUND The Rutrough Road Landfill Post -Closure Fund (RRLF PC Fund) was established with an initial contribution of $5,500,000 per the terms of the "Implementation Agreement For (i) Distribution and Indemnification Agreement dated October 23, 1991 and (ii) Assignment Agreement dated October 23, 1991." The sole purpose of the RRLF PC Fund is to provide the funding necessary for the Authority to manage the post -closure care of the closed Rutrough Road Landfill until (i) such time as the funds in the account are depleted; or, (ii) the Authority determines the account is no longer needed for its intended purpose, in which case, any funds remaining in the account shall be available for use by the Authority for any authorized purpose. The Rutrough Road Landfill Post -Closure Fund (RRLF PC Fund) is inadequate for the five year planning period and staff anticipates that this reserve account will be depleted within the next couple of years. To minimize the impacts on the Authority's existing operating budget, Staff is in the process of developing an alternate method of disposing of the site's leachate which is the single most significant post -closure care cost. Even with the new method of leachate disposal, the Authority will have to assume and fund any remaining post closure -care legal requirements and associated costs within its our Annual Operating Budget currently project to start in FY 2018. 2016-2017 30 RESERVE FUNDS F - (D t, W O ON M <P to W t- W M O N M d' to W W M o N M V' to W M M M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N M M M M o N 0 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 o o 0 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N. N N I- W M W (D (D M O M A N(n M M N W W (D O M r M M M W to M O O W O (n h w M W (D M O W V t- M r to W W 0 W O M o W p U 6i 7 W N N V 't V d' m W uo t` M M u') Z Z t � c (WO m N M (WO M O O N M Iq O N r t - C LL J (o W (D W O co co W (D W to to (n V V' M M N N Q Co V' v) 11) V) Vi E!) V) ff) Vi V) to 11) to M EA to Ffl 69 69 tH to O O M N F. W 'V' M o r o M (D V' W M O O Co O Wr N M W N W 0 N w (D O (D to V: 7 t� (O r N 7 0 W �) t- (D (n r V M m W r w M O M M W <i to V m r w W o(D Mto to W W W W 7 M ON W U M N d' Co V' V N N N 2 Z t» 613� t t» t» t» W. t» t» t» t» t» t» to t» as t» ER t» r M NowW N W r to to M O M M W (D M t� W W M W M r O oc o O W M O M O c' oc O h t` (n M M W W W � O M Mo M� (- M N W J~ N N (D N o7 W N t` W M V' V N (o O to M (o (D Q (n 'D (D t` 'o O t` t` O W 0 7 to W M W W M F Q V; to r (D to 7 t- (D N to N o .- (O M Lq O (D r� 2 W W W W W W (D (D W W h to to (n t t M M N N r p ts) E!) Ffl Ef) fA EA tF) Vi to (f) V) Vi fi) Vi ffl Ffl Ell to V) V) tD W t` O M M W O M N N to W W t - W O W M W M W to 12 N t- O M W N to O W N _W J wl (D ; M V (D W- o c M N oc R r N O _ Q (n O M tT c V M M N V (O V t` W N V O (n t` Z N (MD M N N W M V co V N co N (L W t(DD M too t ttl EA V) ti) to Eli to FA tf) v) tf) e% V) V) FA fA M M M �to M ' ' ' ' o o (WD a N M (WO N 0 0 O 1,. N M N t-- to to V It to W (o W N N Ell) K) tf) 69 t!) t9 to 64 FA to tf) to fA to 02) to FA U) E9 EA r t- t- O O (n (o to to 7 MO vvvcoo Otntnto M M M ccW W W W M N �- V' to to to to W W W W W (V s- M � N w to to to 69 FA w Co 69 FA to to Vj FA e9 to H) to F» V) .- O M r M M M N W O r M to M M t� V V N N W W tD Cl! O n V O Cl! Cl! r O M N W V' N N V N to Cl) r M EA fA V3 Efl 69 Hi Ki t!) Efl FA V) Vi V) Ul EA fA Efi Vi Uf l Vi i t t t M 1 t t i O W i W' M' U') 'V' o W M to V M Co (D N N ff) V) Vi FA FA to to to to to F' EA fA 0 9 ffl Vi V) FA fn V3 t t M M o t t t to t t Co W O N Cl! W c0 M r .E u) w U co of r` wl U9, 69 to to tN V) to 69 to tf) to to es) to to t» to w to r MWIM W Co M tq O N M d' to (D M M M o 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 o 0 N N N N N N N H M M M o 0 o O O o O o o 0 o Cl 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O o O .- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Q O N U) 0 z D LL J J Q M 0 N LO M EH V) ff) Vi fA Efl Vi Y> EA to tf) FA to (f) ff) to tf) 69 V) w Co ' V' N Co ' (D ' ' Co N r ' J to r N O M � M M Q W M W 7 O t- (T! (D V' Co Co Cl) f� (D (O Co NF a. Mto O N W N M W M J= LL t7 Q U p 0 t» t» 69 t» w (» to t» t» w 09,t» t» t» t» (» t» t» w J= W W M M d' mLO V' M M W O N W O w oo n noon W tot- v0 O m O o w o (D v: O al t - c Q (D O T Q W W W tz 6 7 M t- t- M W m W N g N W N N N O to M N o r U tl co N cM N M N M N _ QO w Q J ) ff) t9 to K) w to t to V) t9 t9 t9 EA Ffl t9 w Y)tf)to Vo o I } " " M N O co co co O o M V co M F W N OM V V' M to W M (D t� d' W O W C- Cel V v N V f� V N W to 1n � to O W M M M N M co r .�- N M OLL Q O O t» t» to t» t» (fl w w to t» t» t» t» t» t» t» t» to t» t» to 0 t` CO N W N 7 N W W O b t- C7I tD O to 1- Co V' � t` W W 1I- � Z to C P- N ti> to r- o to to J r O, M V' m N 7 Co N Co O N W It C C to to V' Co tl. to Co M 'r r to Co M � Ell) K) tf) 69 t!) t9 to 64 FA to tf) to fA to 02) to FA U) E9 EA r t- t- O O (n (o to to 7 MO vvvcoo Otntnto M M M ccW W W W M N �- V' to to to to W W W W W (V s- M � N w to to to 69 FA w Co 69 FA to to Vj FA e9 to H) to F» V) .- O M r M M M N W O r M to M M t� V V N N W W tD Cl! O n V O Cl! Cl! r O M N W V' N N V N to Cl) r M EA fA V3 Efl 69 Hi Ki t!) Efl FA V) Vi V) Ul EA fA Efi Vi Uf l Vi i t t t M 1 t t i O W i W' M' U') 'V' o W M to V M Co (D N N ff) V) Vi FA FA to to to to to F' EA fA 0 9 ffl Vi V) FA fn V3 t t M M o t t t to t t Co W O N Cl! W c0 M r .E u) w U co of r` wl U9, 69 to to tN V) to 69 to tf) to to es) to to t» to w to r MWIM W Co M tq O N M d' to (D M M M o 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 o 0 N N N N N N N H M M M o 0 o O O o O o o 0 o Cl 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O o O .- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Q O N U) 0 z D LL J J Q M 0 N LO M 0 0 0 CL N Y O U) N m L 2 a a) O U L m n. U m C L u m 'a c a Ec m a) N ` N -O o c � c m m o m - n @ 7 cn U) O 0 O 0 N r a) N m CO vi 0 O to O N °c c m 3 a N a) 7 J L 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 (n C 'o O 0o 0 E O O N p d N 0) () O 6q N N (D m U 0 aX) `) 0 o) C C o) O N e a) o O C N N N N O m Y V N '_' 0 m �, m m E c a) aai rn W 3 m o ro- E E m a c u3 °� a c 0- a) C N Z O 0 Z m C ca @ O a) C U c) a) 3o m m E p a C C C O. a) O J m o m m N CL (UL) 3 (n 'nEMMIMUMMIMMMIR v; a) 0 a) a) -0 c O O O Q 0 C E O f6 u 'U) + � o 0 E U C Z_ O co -0 (a (n (n OV) O a) M 'R 0) N O c UC) Ca co N Co O TI- � i O C L O :F a) �oo� C0 0o CD .. o_ -a m Ea)�: Q C C C O .L6 '- N .- aEE O 1 O EO U U _ a) —mE O) C 0 to C: c � U a) O C (q 0 -a� a) a� a) >a 0)_ Q E�E� a) 4= 7 O "C O (n N O C O O O T - a) E a) F'C O N-E�'o) y 6 C (a O. LL C U T fa O m 'O NT a) O O a) O O c ( (T6 N N �ENc O = -2 c @ Qa 'Oooi�m N� C 41 O O Q a�xi��oO i 4- a) F 5 r- _ O :5 N N 6 a .0 N N 57 CO C) 3CT_0 U_ 'O l.L (on (0 N m C m T C a) O coL yea) � m 'E M U N N O .L a) O E _:s q co� tU m 0 p c v- � 'O a) a) 'O O - m 0-0-0a) U O_ N 'N 0 Q(6 Q7 O N Q c6 N m c a) E°L��c) to W 'O O °) E -o o a)oco 0 O F--SEnC-09. N M 0 O r `t 'd N Lo Lo 000_ M r Zz� m t0 N V' O M O N CO LO C = LO r V N- 000 (N0 V M-. r m � LL m6? N t- N It M r W 6?W 69 69 ai (U N W O o o O LU 0 0 O W e» vs F Z Z - F J W O a N 00 F-a� z w " — o � cn w Lo O i� O 00 O M S O) (0 M N N Q 0 Z l0 r l00 - r r- V d ~ O M L r 00 N V (0 o N �I to 0wmco rI am w m 0 v M X Uf 69 U3 69 Eft w PA v) u> w � W vi Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 w VA 69 w 69 (A 69 69 w uli C) (n a w co w Q W C V O J a 0 C CD FF J N W Q J S =" d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to O w 69 to to w to w G9 69 0 C W Q LL 0= a o U U) Z 0 o U e» v> W O Q aLr) U) aui 0 0 0 N M (r0 r O M G u o 0 S ol CT C6 a. W N d Q Q N 0 M M M M M } LYS U. LU w 0 W J w 6- 64 w <A V3 69 w w w w v> J 47 a a a00 W, z F st } U W O W I- = N >_ } 0 0 0 d' V N N N M M O O O 00 M 00 00 W 00 0) 0) W W 00 t0 U0 t0 N N 0 F W Y N N N N 0 0 2 0 = N O H' le V V 't (n (n (0 0 m m M M c') m M M m M M Cl) Z ',0 N a U' G9 w 69 M to w 60 w 69 69 69 ,Oa LL 69 0 a r Zo J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 O O o N N N M (0 M O) W C C C (0 L0 LQ N N N W W CL 0e 200co0OD0000000OD0)0) V d' M O O m W W O O Q 69 w fA 61> W u) U3. 69 69 LO 69 to � C7 O t0 B O O" u')M O M C Z W Y' O O N d1 r M <)' M N V 1� O N t0 r O M O (' 0 !�2 �! { V M M M V:� V V w 69 69 69 w 69 69 w w 69 69 W 2 O O D N M (0 M O) 0 0 v N d' (n W 0 0 � N N M co X X 69 M M 69 M M 69 M M t» (M 69 w 69 E9 Vi E9 d) Vi EA w M w w � c 0 ~lo to °) Z 0 m 0 m a coo m m C 0 N M M V' t0 O O N 0 a N. N N N N N N N N N N � � E9 V3 EA 69 69 V> 69 E9 fA EA Ui (a 69 E i) E U o 0 0 w w 2 WW o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 M to M H) w M EA 69 w 0 ` Q m N LL. U (» cO LYI O r W a1 O N M V (0 M J QN w N" N N N N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H 0 } N N N N N N N N N N N F 0 0 0 CL N Y O U) N m L 2 a a) O U L m n. U m C L u m 'a c a Ec m a) N ` N -O o c � c m m o m - n @ 7 cn U) O 0 O 0 N r a) N m CO vi 0 O to O N °c c m 3 a N a) 7 J L 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 (n C 'o O 0o 0 E O O N p d N 0) () O 6q N N (D m U 0 aX) `) 0 o) C C o) O N e a) o O C N N N N O m Y V N '_' 0 m �, m m E c a) aai rn W 3 m o ro- E E m a c u3 °� a c 0- a) C N Z O 0 Z m C ca @ O a) C U c) a) 3o m m E p a C C C O. a) O J m o m m N CL (UL) 3 (n 'nEMMIMUMMIMMMIR v; a) 0 a) a) -0 c O O O Q 0 C E O f6 u 'U) + � o 0 E U C Z_ O co -0 (a (n (n OV) O a) M 'R 0) N O c UC) Ca co N Co O TI- � i O C L O :F a) �oo� C0 0o CD .. o_ -a m Ea)�: Q C C C O .L6 '- N .- aEE O 1 O EO U U _ a) —mE O) C 0 to C: c � U a) O C (q 0 -a� a) a� a) >a 0)_ Q E�E� a) 4= 7 O "C O (n N O C O O O T - a) E a) F'C O N-E�'o) y 6 C (a O. LL C U T fa O m 'O NT a) O O a) O O c ( (T6 N N �ENc O = -2 c @ Qa 'Oooi�m N� C 41 O O Q a�xi��oO i 4- a) F 5 r- _ O :5 N N 6 a .0 N N 57 CO C) 3CT_0 U_ 'O l.L (on (0 N m C m T C a) O coL yea) � m 'E M U N N O .L a) O E _:s q co� tU m 0 p c v- � 'O a) a) 'O O - m 0-0-0a) U O_ N 'N 0 Q(6 Q7 O N Q c6 N m c a) E°L��c) to W 'O O °) E -o o a)oco 0 O F--SEnC-09. N M Roanoke Valley Resource Authority CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND CONTINGENCY FUND The purpose of the Contingency Fund is to provide (i) rate stabilization on an annual basis; and (ii) emergency funding for unforeseen increases in expenses or decreases in revenues. All reasonable efforts will be made to maintain a minimum balance in the Contingency Fund equal to 8-10% of the Authority's total annual operating budget for the current fiscal year. Funds are adequate for the immediate planning period. The Contingency Fund also serves to assist in complying with post -closure requirements of state and federal financial assurance regulations. 2016-2017 33 RESERVE FUNDS CONTINGENCY 34 FUND COMMENTS plus from Operations plus from Operations plus from Operations plus from Operations fer to Site Development fer from Recycling Fund plus from Operations 'plus from Operations 'plus from Operations 'plus from Operations ftit from Operations 4icit from Operations 'plus from Operations 'plus from Operations 'plus from Operations fer to Operating Budget fer to Operating Budget 'plus from Operations ,fer to Operating Budget 'plus from Operations ,fer to Operating Budget plus from Operations isfer to Pay Bond Debt plus from Operations :r from Post Development plus from Operations ;fer to Operating Budget >fer for Residential Area ,plus from Operations ;fer to Operating Budget rplus from Operations ;fer to Operating Budget rplus from Operations 'er to Property Protection ;fer to Operating Budget 2016-2017 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 2016 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ROANOKE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 WHEREAS, Section 5.9 of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Members Use Agreement provides that the Authority shall prepare and submit its operating budget for the forthcoming fiscal year to the Board of Supervisors of the County, the City Council of the City of Roanoke and the Town Council of the Town of Vinton; and WHEREAS, the Chief Executive Officer of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority has submitted the fiscal year 2016-2017 budget of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority for approval. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORSOF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA that the fiscal year 2016-2017 budget for the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority, is hereby approved, and the County Administrator and the Chief Deputy Clerk are authorized to execute and attest respectively, on behalf of the County, any documentation, in form by the County Attorney, necessary to evidence said approval. Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. E.3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: April 26, 2016 Request to transfer funds in the amount of $11,000 from Board Contingency to pay for the employee picnic Deborah Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk Thomas C. Gates County Administrator Request to transfer funds to pay for the employee picnic BACKGROUND: The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and Administration will be hosting a picnic at Explore Park for employees and family on Saturday, May 21, 2016, from 10 am - 3 pm. DISCUSSION: Chairman P. Jason Peters has asked that the Board consider transferring funds from Board Contingency to the Finance Department, employee benefits account, to pay for this event. FISCAL IMPACT: There is currently $35,000 remaining in the Board Contingency account. Allocating these funds would leave a balance of $24,000 until the new fiscal year begins July 1, 2016. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the transfer of these funds from Board Contingency. Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F_1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 26, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: The petition of Star City Church of Christ to obtain a Special Use Permit in a C-2, High Intensity Commercial, District for the operation of religious assembly on approximately 1.21 acres, located at 5933 Williamson Road, Hollins Magisterial District SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson Deputy Director of Community Development APPROVED BY: Thomas C. Gates County Administrator ISSUE: Consent agenda item for first reading of an ordinance on an application to obtain a special use permit. BACKGROUND: The first reading on this ordinance is accomplished by adoption of this ordinance in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions; rather, approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on this ordinance is scheduled for May 24, 2016. The title of this ordinance is as follows: 1. The petition of Star City Church of Christ to obtain a Special Use Permit in a C-2, High Intensity Commercial, District for the operation of religious assembly on approximately 1.21 acres, located at 5933 Williamson Road, Hollins Magisterial District. Page 1 of 2 DISCUSSION: There is no discussion on this agenda item. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of this rezoning ordinance for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for May 24, 2016. 2. That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Item(s) 1, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Page 2 of 2 County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 For Staff Use Only Date deceived: Rppeceivejdyhy: ` �t�i\ fee: I PC/BZA date: Placards issued: BOS date: Case Number 1 - 3 / Q ✓� ti Check type of application filed (check all that apply) 0 RezoningXSpecial Use 11 Variance 0 Waiver 0 Administrative Appeal 0 Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/ ddress w/zip Phone: D'I U-,) J /- 5 7./5 5j, , 6 4-,, �� vr�"1 n �� 5 Work: (�r1 JAZ Cell F o�tit� 114-a40� Fax No.: Owner's name/address w zip Phone #: Work: �J►'i l '" ` Fax No, #; Property Location , 1 t AOA 5cr1 ` !nn ' Magisterial District: 7aEky�N.� V-C1M t- VA-dgD Community Planning area: Tax Map No.: 0,60, (76' y -ot �0a -0000 Existing Zoning: C 7— Size Size of parcel(s): Acres: 1"2-) Existing Land Use: G0 6E Proposed Zoning: C 2- P top os e d Land Us e: 01 r, ProposedLandUse:l1±rlrois �;Scn,r3i,Y Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED TF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/SiW/CP V/AA R/S/W/CP V/Ari RJS/W/CP Y/AA Consultation 8,112" x 11" concept pian Application fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the Rowledge and consent f the owner. Owner's Signature 2 The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the .Zoning Ordinance. d2r V eS ��e �, . u w J ; •t c� , 4JJ e E- (? l� 4—kLas n ,e (` A- j `lam Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. -h ) -� We C ( C. C_' L r (� Ire 5A—Lr.LUt.I exe rr,�a+ L'7-rl3o-o Zc u, l 1 Uc� i Mst r�^�e.� 5 jYC' c�v� rr 1 t 'V �'��- "� � S t.Vf OLLn'4i� Y'es� pion+-< ) (_v-r�venle`_r� G'.v�c� 4L 'c 0-"- Lr) I� 01r Q Care L'. "� c1S Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parkshecreation and fire and rescue. i,.3 A k � r-� C' i m 2 G�- �-c� wCL.s i,LS-� 0,/)k IA_;-(,� p {}X -t S -Ti�' e� p C� t �,C �\n G� t 0-1 S � 4-�' � �ti.� 6J rye ai r i �G� .�a ��� wJ l%L;r1 Vile nexoej i n W C' kr, v Vim. -o S Lr lc�i c� o caw F ( -VW x vera VQ ,--A [t_Js"��(71fA.,iYi� j'"Y�,'ri �.G-ltiC�� 1�7r'C:+ {fit �L�r'Y(�L�-✓tiC,,�;'ty � �Ol,�.� rv'iPY��� S y A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered_ Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANT'S a. Applicant name and name of development b. Date, scale and north arrow c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc, f The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties g. All property lines and easements h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZON VG and SPECI.rlL USE PE7Z WT APPLICr1NTS k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that ail items required in the checklist above are complete. Signature of applicant Date no Community Development Planning & Zoning Division 838 POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC NIPACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic -generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application its order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reserve the right to rerluest a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary,) High Traffic -Generating Land Uses: • Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi -family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units • Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows) • Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash • Retail shop/Shopping center • Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) • Regional public facilities • Educational/Recreationa[ facilities • Religious assemblies • [hotel/Motel • Golf course • Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic • Industrial site/Factory • Day care center • Bank • Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: • Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500 -ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc) • For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly • When required to,evaluate access issues • Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six -Yr Road Plan, etc.) • Development inan area where there is a [mown existing traffic and/or safety problem - • Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) • Substantial departure from the Community Plan • Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (104) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day Effective date: April 19, 2W6 7 R Ary 1 F Community Development r Planning & Zoning Division Y838 NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PER1tiIIT PETITION PLANNNG CONNISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC LmPACT STUDY The Roanoke"eounty Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the Countv Traffic Engineer or staff frnm the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Effective date: April 19, 2008 Aires D,�� FP -I 6 ky, Mame of Petition Peti s 4s Signature /LZA/ 6 - Date r.■■I ,K.. U ; jL .- f 9 3 .�'�x i 'f t.t �sas.. ..• se1 N, 44 C:4 i 1 P4 M 04 W C7 to Q CD to co C) O 04 5 0 {[� .� o 7 Q > 0 m �4 w ro ro ro r o 3 .�'�x i 'f t.t �sas.. ..• se1 N, 44 C:4 i 1 _ I -i f. 14 r- N • g t r 3 N Z E O a U N 0 �N t _�0/ O Q O �`o LL U to O 7 z O U p r v N O (n O L 00 O r r Lu N m 2 U O N U d O .. o f .� (n U U oo a s E c' N n o N.. _ N m 'E N m - - o M z O M it N -0 -0 Z N m a co) ug �CL CL m s O- rn O O X N ml n_eaa5 Q W d d H Q � U) N Of N V ry N N U N U N U N N N N U N N U N CO Z E 0 a' Ci N 00 _ Z/ - r` Q oo N 3 0 v o d0 U � O .. E - - co _ y w O O U o NC \ EC N -0 N N _ o `o `o . o N — M z o N m �o����� io0 _ Z (6 a d M N o o 0 N N fl- N n n U p p .. tll 0 C 11 C) co •� N U m s CCLCL CL L N O O X N m / neaa5 Q W d d H Q ` 9 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F_2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 26, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: The petition of Julie Abernethy, Friendship Apartment Village Corporation, to obtain a Special Use Permit in a C-2CS, High Intensity Commercial, District with conditions and special use permit for outdoor gatherings on approximately 10.51 acres, located at 450 Springbeauty Street and Florist Road, Hollins Magisterial District SUBMITTED BY: Philip Thompson Deputy Director of Community Development APPROVED BY: Thomas C. Gates County Administrator ISSUE: Consent agenda item for a first reading of an ordinance on an application to obtain a special use permit BACKGROUND: The first reading on this ordinance is accomplished by adoption of this ordinance in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions; rather, approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for May 24, 2016. The title of this ordinance is as follows: 1. The petition of Julie Abernethy, Friendship Apartment Village Corp., to obtain a Special Use Permit in a C-2CS, High Intensity Commercial, District with conditions and special use permit for outdoor gatherings on approximately 10.51 acres, located at 450 Springbeauty Street and Florist Road, Hollins Magisterial District. Page 1 of 2 DISCUSSION: There is no discussion on this agenda item. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of this rezoning ordinance for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for May 24, 2016. 2. That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Item(s) 2, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Page 2 of 2 APPLICATION FOR OUTDOOR GATHERING Friendship Living March 25, 241E Contents Introduction......................................................................................................................................... OutdoorGathering Specifics................................................................................................................ SafetyPlan....................................................................................................................................... ParkingPlan.......................................................................................................................................... Circulation/Traffic Plan........................................................................................................................ LightingSpecifics.................................................................................................................................. SanitizationPian................................................................................................................................... FoodSafety Plan................................................................................................................................... OtherAttachments: ........ ........................................... ............. .................... ..................................... .. 2 .. 2 -3 .. 4 .. 4 4 ..5 ..5 ..5 Introduction Julie Abernethy, the Assistant Director of Resident Services in Friendship Living is applying for an Outdoor Gathering Permit for an outdoor musical event, hereafter referred to as the Friendship Summer Concert Series, that will be held on a Saturday once a month from May through September. The property intended for the use of the outdoor gathering is determined to be a Transition area, specifically a multi -family residential use area. Outdoor Gathering Specifics Friendship is the sole sponsor of the Friendship Summer Concert Series, a charitable event where all admission and beer/wine sale proceeds are donated to local charities. Friendship is the sponsor and underwrites all the event expenses. Friendship has contracted with five different musical guests one for each of the dates from May through September to perform in our Friendship Amphitheater (map attached). All concerts run from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. The Concert Series dates are set as follows: 1. Saturday, May 28, 2016 — The Key West Band 2. Saturday, June 25, 2016—Absoulut 3. Saturday, July 23, 2016 —Jane Powell 4. Saturday, August 27, 2016 — Seven Mile Ford 5. Saturday, September 10, 2016 — The Legacy Motown Revue To further engage the local community, Friendship is working with the Development Director Amy Milberger of the Jefferson Center to have each concert date opened by a student artist from the Jefferson Center Music Lab. The Director of Education and Outreach John Maroun is working to prepare these students now to play as opening acts for these outdoor concerts. Friendship has contracted with SRO Productions, managed by Kent Martin, to handle audio on each scheduled date. SRO Productions sets up a sound table and adjusts sound levels for the musicians. Friendship management decided to hire one sound company to manage sound for all events to ensure consistent sound levels as to not negatively affect the surrounding apartments or neighborhood. Kent Martin has a history of musical event production in the Roanoke Valley, specifically with Party in the Park in Roanoke, and contributed greatly to the planning of the event in 2015. In addition to the band performance, Friendship will also be contracting with up to two (2) local food trucks and one (1) local beer truck business for attendees to enjoy (See Map). The Fire Marshal walks through the event date prior to show opening time to inspect the fire -safety devices of each of the kitchens on the food trucks. Furthermore, the Roanoke County Fire Marshal, Brian Simmons, with whom Friendship consulted in the planning of the 2015 event, insisted Friendship have extinguishers at each 10 ft. x 10 ft. tent location as well as at the Budweiser beer truck and the food truck kitchens. To be overly prepared, Friendship Living staff purchased additional fire extinguishers on behalf of our food vendors to be in compliance. We expect approximately 100 of our retirement community residents to be in attendance, and we are estimating an additional 300 people from the general public to attend. • Sponsors of the event: Friendship Living • Nature of the gathering: Charitable Outdoor Concert • Events planned: a. Saturday, May 28, 2016 — The Key West Band b. Saturday, June 25, 2016 — Absoulut c. Saturday, July 23, 2016 — Jane Powell d. Saturday, August 27, 2016 —Seven Mile Ford e. Saturday, September 10, 2016 — The Legacy Motown Revue • Displays/entertainment: Food trucks, beer truck, live music Number of tickets sold: admission wristbands are sold at the gate • Estimate of attendance: 400-500 • Event Times: Saturday evenings from 6:00 p.m. — 8:00 p.m. Safety Plan One of our main goals is to ensure the safety of all participants. To that end, we have consulted with the Fire Marshal and are working closely with Safety Station #1. Last year, in 2015 we had one EMS truck from Cave Spring Rescue Squad with three EMS staff on location parked at our event in case of medical emergencies. We will also have a minimum of 20 Friendship staff members in attendance to ensure the safety and security of all attendees. Each Friendship volunteer wears a bright - colored lime green event shirt with "EVENT STAFF" in bold font across the back as to be spotted easily for event attendees. The volunteer coordinator, Julie Abernethy, meet with the volunteers at the beginning of the event to review event procedures and answer questions. Volunteers are assigned to the following areas: • Parking lot entrance from Florist Road • Admission Tent #1 from Parking Lot • Admission Tent #2 from Bluebell Lane ID Check station & Beer Ticket Sales • Beer Truck serving • Golf carts to help seat patrons Friendship hires two off-duty Police Officers from Roanoke County to be present at the event in uniform to have an authoritative presence in case of an emergency. The two officers are located primarily at the Florist Road entrance for all visitors to see as they arrive. In addition to hired police presence, Friendship Security staffs offers an additional Friendship Security officer at our event, just for increased assistance as needed. Parking Plan Friendship provides onsite parking for employees and patrons (See Map). The majority of event attendee parking is directed to field location as managed by Friendship parking volunteers. For those patrons who need handicapped parking, Friendship volunteers direct them to our Employee and Overflow Parking Lot. A golf cart shuttle runs from the parking lot down into the field. If the use of the Assisted Living Parking Lot is required, we small bus and golf cart shuttles attendees from the Lot to the Amphitheater and back. If it is necessary that we use a small bus, the driver will be a Friendship Transportation staff member with an appropriate Commercial Driver's License through the Commonwealth of Virginia. The main grassy -area parking lot will be monitored by a minimum of five parking volunteers, and an additional minimum of two volunteers monitor the resident parking area to ensure that no event -goers park in Resident Parking lots. Cave Spring Rescue Squad, or another EMS vehicle, parked on our event location inside of the event area and set-up a tent with their staff. They are available throughout the event in the case of an emergency. Circulation /Traffic Plan Friendship will have a minimum of five Friendship volunteers to assist in the flow of traffic from Florist Rd. onto Spring Beauty Street. Directional parking signs line the property and directing the flow of visitors to the large grassy parking area. One volunteer will be stationed near the entrance of the Friendship Health and Rehabilitation on Hershberger Road to direct the west -bound flow of traffic to the campus. One volunteer will be stationed at the entrance of the Friendship Independent Living Campus on Hershberger Road to direct the east -bound flow of traffic to campus. This volunteer will also direct traffic to the Friendship Assisted Living Parking Lot if the additional parking space becomes necessary. One volunteer will be stationed at the entrance of the Independent Living Campus on Florist Road to direct the north- and south -bound flow of traffic to the campus. One volunteer will be stationed at the intersection of Springbeauty Street and Bluebell Lane to direct the flow of traffic to the parking lot entrances. Lighting Specifics In the late summer, rental lights from United Rentals on Orange Avenue are utilized at the very end of the concert at concert goers are leaving. These lights are directed into the property as to not affect our surrounding neighbors. These lights are gas -operated and will be in use from approximately 5:00 p.m. -9:00 p.m., again only in August and September due to lighting needs in the late summer. Sanitization Plan Friendship will be providing three port -a -johns for the use of attendees. Each port -a -john will be equipped with sanitization equipment. Friendship will also have hand sanitization available near each food or beer truck. The sanitation station provides hand sanitizer and paper towels outside of the port -a -johns and the food area. Food Safety Plan Food trucks are included by invitation only from the most respected local food trucks in business in the Roanoke Valley. Other Attachments: • Signed and dated letter,on letterhead from the property manager/owner -approval for event • Planned community meetings with surrounding community: o Planning Commission Hearing Date: May 3,2016,7:00 p.m. o Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: May 24, 2016, 7:00 p.m. t.J�J March 25, 2016 To Whom It May Concern: I, Julie Abernethy, give my permission for Friendship Village Corporation to hold the Friendship Summer Concert Series. Sincerely, Julie ernethy Assistant Director of Resident Services, Friendship Retirement WEST FORK fCCARVINS CREEK TAX #38.11-1-1 N ti LOT 8 PROPERTY OF z 6 k CITY OF ROANOKE D.B. 691, PG. 307 B1fi' BLOQ �,. D.B. 691, PG. 314 SECTION bA ;a9� LOT 7 "BROOK 7, ' wo YEAR FLOODPLAIN (APPROX. LOCATION) ♦y r^ �CARIN5 GREEK\ \ 7 ��/ LOT 6 / 5 (APPROX. LOCATION) y \ 3 �. N 7124 G1 E 659.58L( A 59,77'. TIE LfNF ONLY �\ `iJ•�F 8 \_ 705 'V E 9 (z F vt L3 B1,B1' \ SEE ` � B ` y NOTE #4 �c STORMWATER SF4f I of MANAGEMENT CENTERLINE 1q• � �v AREA REMAINING PORTION OF E "F-1' EX. 20' y PRIVATE 1 TRACT DRAINAGE 1x.514 AC. EA52MENT 1p \ge' TO ARVNS 1F.\ PROPERTY OF D O CRr K t+ MENDSHIP MANOR APARTMENTORIL AT1ON 109.46' ` TN PARCEL 'F" ORIGINAL TAX #36.15--1-1 a TA) 4 i Ivy D.B. 1061, PG • 764 (P,B. 23, PG. 170) I I ^ PI 1 �fRIENDSHIF / VILLA( S 65'4O'29' W L9 LS 243.48' N /CITY OF ROANOKE CITY EASEIJ.ENT 3 'g 30' WATER LINE na 1223, PG. 1247 7 L43• o; 65'40'29` E 241,89' L1 L2� -�)� B03* 41 B v EX. 15' ACCESS EASEMENT L4 v X32 �'1 �i y Q 0 % 6 L5 L>G L7 F 4 ORI / W u�i PARKING F, fgse n�q�� rc � 67,4' M�h,T N•4Ge 0 NEW LL 3 NEW �; TRACT "F -1D" TRACT "F -1C" 3, 406 AC, 5.333 AC. NEW TAX # 50.9' #460 NEW TAX tea&35.00' 38.15-1-1.5 3 51. BLDG. -� 38.15-1-1.4 p #4403 � 1 3 STY. BLDG. 'T S OgEX.IP e TAX #R 38.15 1--2 `ry T 13 52 ' X32 9• z�208' If 10 rn IICN U 4 53.6' 3 sryIs 12 • 80.7' � "A—i" #327 BRICK BLDG. � TRACT � 81p3+£ 14 14g 15 +u (4.772 AC.) 314.49. 259' " 4 KS (P.S. 23, PG. 1 ) 24.7' 84 g f 4 ,1t . V 138.88,�5 SEE INSET-- k o 9 16 5.00' A„ O 391ro r #392 �' T 4 STV. B}6G� 75 N z04.05 STY. 76.8' 8117C N�-7 y �,. 4 5 9LOC. /8�259•�E%.PK his 1_3 17 TRACT "F—IB" -WI �; ti TR F -1A" I ST#Y367 6LJG. $N PARKING PARKING 1, 964 AC. i/ 1,111 At. NEW TAX # iAj NEW TAX # S o 80.7' L�15-1-1.3 E; 38.1 1-1.2 4 �'.� 316.87 4(iH.s3' EX.IP S sf'42'57' W 2 1 HF-RSHOERGER ROAD, Application Requirements Consultation with the County Planning staff to review the feasibility of the proposal and to obtain recommended procedures and technical assistance. Applicant is encouraged to contact adjoining property owners to inform them of the proposal. Application must be legible and signed by property owner, contract purchaser, or owner's agent. Justification stating in general terms the change in use of the property, the effect of the changes on the surrounding area, the reasons for the request, the consistency of the request with the Community Plan, and the consistency of the request with the general purposes of the Zoning Ordinance and the purpose stated at the beginning of the applicable district regulations. Concept Plan of the proposed project and the concept plan checklist must be submitted with the applications. Plan must be 8.5" x 1 1 ". Metes and bounds description must accompany rezoning and special use permit application. Water and sewer application and plauivaetrie maps must accompany rezoning and special use permit application, if applicable. List of adjoining property owners including owner's names, addresses (mailing address including zip code) and tax map numbers of all adjoining properties and those directly across any public right-of-way must accompany application, including those in adjacent jurisdictions. Refer to tax records in the County Assessor's office. Application fees must accompany application and are as follows: Rezoning — Agri/Single/Two $115 + $20/acre or porion thereof Rezoning — Multi -family $860 + $25/acre or portion thereof Rezoning — industrial $840 + $30/acre or portion thereof Rezoning — Commercial $915 + $32/acre or portion thereof Land Use Plan Amendment $710 Special Use B Landfill $1,875 Special Use D Other $40 Variance $190 Waiver $190 Administrative Appeal $275 In addition, the applicant must pay legal advertlsement.fees. Staff will prepare ad for the applicant and deliver ad to The Roanoke Times. The applicant will be billed by The Roanoke Times for the ad. Public Hearing Notices must be posted at clearly visible locations along the street frontage or property lines of the subject property. Notices will be issued by Planning &.Zoning following receipt of the completed application. For further information or assistance, please contact: Department of Community Development - Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive, SW P O Boa 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Phone (540)772-2068 - Fax (540)776-7155 E -Mail: planninae roanokecount va. ov All required items must be submitted before the application deadline. County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 For Staff Use Only D to r ce vett: j Received by: Application fee: ['CTIA da e: a.o Placards issued: 130S date: Case Number , -- � 6 1 1 A ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) ❑ Rezoning El Special Use ❑ Variance ❑ Waiver ❑ Administrative Appeal ❑ Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address w/zip Phone: 540) 204-6049 Work: (540) 777_-4612 Julie Abernethy, Asst. Director of Resident Services Cell #: 397 Hershberger Road, Roanoke, VA 24012 Fax No.: (540) 777-5955 Owner's name/address whip Phone 4: 540 777-7599 Work: (540) 777-4612 Friendship Apartment Village Corp Fax No. #: (540) 777-5955 397 Hershberger Road, Roanoke, VA 24012 Property Location Magisterial District: Hollins Community Planning area: Hollins 450 Springbeauty Street, Roanoke, VA 24012 Tax Map No.: 038.15-01-01.00-0000 Existing Zoning: C2 - High Intensity Commercial Size ofparcel(s): Acres: 10.51AC Existing Land Use: Transitional REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS. (R/SIW/CP) .' Proposed Zoning: N/A Proposed Land Use: NIA Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes No , IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes No VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS ,(VIKAA) Variance/Waiver of Section(s) NIA of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: NIA Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to NIA Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): NIA of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to NIA Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/SAVICP v/AA R/SAV/CP V/AA RISnv/CP N'/AA Consultation 8 1/2" x I V concept plan Application fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent rthe owner. Owner's Signature 2 JUSTIFICATION FOR.REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR. COWMAN (15.2-22.32) REVIEW REQUESTS Applicant Julie Abernethy, Assistant Director of Resident Services, Friendship The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to deten-nine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. Please see attached documents. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plana Please see attached documents. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. Please see attached documents. JUSTIFICATION FOR VARIANCE. REQUEST Applicant The of Zoning Appeals is required by Section 15.2-2309 of the Code of Virginia to consider the following factors before a variance can be granted. Please read the factors listed below carefully and in your own words, describe how the request meets each factor. If additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper. 1. The variance shall not be contrary to the public interest and shall be in harmony with the intended spirit and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance, NIA 2. The variance will not be of a substantial detriment to the adjacent properties or the character of the district. NIA 3. Evidence supporting claim: NIA 4 JUSTIFICATION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL REQUEST Applicant Please respond to the following as thoroughly as possible. If additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper. 1. Reasons for appeal: NIA 2. Evidence supporting claim: NIA S CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending oil the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL,APPLICANTS Applicant name and name of development b. Date, scale and north at -row E4< Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions Lal'd. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties L/ Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. ER f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties All property lines and easements h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights ff-i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional h?1brinafion requh-ed for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS EO/k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals ED"n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed q. if project is to be phased, please show phase schedule certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. K Signature 6 applicant 3/25/2016 Date 6 Community Development •Y P Planning & Zoning Division 3 POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The following is a list of potentially high traffic -generating land uses and road network situations that could elicit a more detailed analysis of the existing and proposed traffic pertinent to your rezoning, subdivision waiver, public street waiver, or special use permit request. If your request involves one of the items on the ensuing list, we recommend that you meet with a County planner, the County traffic engineer, and/or Virginia Department of Transportation staff to discuss the potential additional traffic related information that may need to be submitted with the application in order to expedite your application process. (Note this list is not inclusive and the County staff and VDOT reserve the right to request a traffic study at any time, as deemed necessary.) High Traffic --Generating Land Uses: • Single-family residential subdivisions, Multi -family residential units, or Apartments with more than 75 dwelling units • Restaurant (with or without drive-through windows) • Gas station/Convenience store/Car wash • Retail shop/Shopping center • Offices (including: financial institutions, general, medical, etc.) • Regional public facilities • Educational/Recreational facilities • Religious assemblies • Hotel/Motel • Golf course • Hospital/Nursing home/Clinic • Industrial site/Factory • Day care center • Bank • Non-specific use requests Road Network Situations: • Development adjacent to/with access onto/within 500 -ft of intersection of a roadway classified as an arterial road (e.g., Rte 11, 24, 115, 117, 460, 11/460, 220, 221, 419, etc) • For new phases or changes to a development where a previously submitted traffic study is more than two (2) years old and/or roadway conditions have changed significantly • When required to evaluate access issues • Development with ingress/egress on roads planned or scheduled for expansion, widening, improvements, etc. (i.e. on Long Range Transportation Plan, Six -Yr Road Plan, etc.) • Development in an area where there is a known existing traffic and/or safety problem • Development would potentially negatively impact existing/planned traffic signal(s) • Substantial departure from the Community Plan • Any site that is expected to generate over one hundred (100) trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day Effective date: April 19, 2005 7 ok aaAiV Community Development _ Planning & Zoning Division z reaa NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in malting a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessilale farrther sludy is provided as part of this applicalion package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Effective date: April 19, 2005 NIA Name of Petition Petitioner's Signature Date Unofficial Property Record Card - Roanoke County, Virginia General Property Data Parcel ID 038.95-01-01.00-0000 Prior Parcel ID -- PropertyOwner FRIENDSHIP APARTMENT VILLAGE - CORPORATION Mailing Address P O BOX 5009 City ROANOKE Mailing State VA Zip 24012 Account Number 13443 Property Location 450 SPRINGBEAUTY ST Property Use COMMERCIAL Most Recent Sale Date 7/2712007 Legal Reference DB200711647 Grantor FRIENDSHIP MANOR APT VILLAGE CORP, Sale Price 0 Jurisdiction-ZoningCode-County-C2CS-General Land Area 10.51 -AC Description Commercial]GondSUP Current Property Assessment Card 1 Value Building Value 0 Xtra Features 39,000 Land Value 735,700 Total Value 774,700 Value Building Description Building Style NIA # of Living Units NIA Year Built NIA StyielStory Height NIA Insulation NIA Foundation Type NIA Frame Type NIA Roof Structure NIA Roof Cover NIA Primary Ext. Siding NIA Flooring Type NIA Basement Floor NIA Heating Type NIA Heating Fuel NIA Air Conditioning 0% Finished Area (SF) NIA Interior Walls NIA # of Bsmt Garages 0 Number Rooms 0 # of Bedrooms 0 # of Full Baths 0 # of 314 Baths 0 # of 112 Baths 0 # of Other Fixtures 0 Legal Description REMAINING FOR OF RESUSD TR F1 HERSHBERGER RD & FLORIST RD Narrative Description of Property This property contains 10.51 -AC of land mainly classified as COMMERCIAL with a(n) NIA style building, built about NIA, having NIA exterior and NIA roof cover, with NIA unit(s), 0 room(s), 0 bedroom(s), 0 bath(s), 0 half bath(s). 1-'1'Opefiy IfltldUea Disclaimer: This information is believed to be correct but is subject to change and is not warranteed. O 'k v c� m ' 1 1. O o VII N F I C a' EROSION SEDIMENT- 7He FfAAi3COK-i'OMPKIKa COMMUNITY CENTER ARCHITECTS ii 4 s 3A CONTROL PLAN FOIEKOMP MANON. ROANOM COUNTY, VA �- DESIGN GROUP 3 h Concert Series_Parking Area se'r4Ntvp ` Roanoke.Counly a oiselaime, itis undersiaad rh al the dal, displayed through Ii a pphcation is whlect to .slant change and chat its acwracy cannot he guarai the m.pshave been cleated hon, intormaOon provided by various gove o eat and private —11. at varidus levels lot ac .—Z. The daW Is provEd ed to you as is, vnlh no w,rranry, representation or guaranty as to the Centeno sequence, accuracy.dme6ness o maplot...ss of any of the N info m von provided herein. + It is theresponandity of th e n user of the data la he e of the data's W E 5'15 and 1e i the data in "'pp .tanner. S feel 0 55 710 270 Dale: 311 1:2,257 Lr~� - viryl���tl l I I I - Roanoke County Concert Series_Treeline distances Disdalmer. It is understood that the data displayed through [his application is subject to constant change and that Its accuracy cannot he guaranteed. The maps have been created from inforrnalton provided by various government and private sources at various levels of accuracy. The data is provided to you as is: With no warranty, representation or guaranty as to the content, sequence, accuracy, timeliness or completeness of any of lie N infomnallon provd en herein. It is the resp rnsibtily of the user of the data to be aviare of the w E data's limilaliens and 1e utilize the data in art appropriate manner. S Feet 0 70 140 280 Data: 3125/2016 1:2,257 ea I � r.. Roanoke County Concert Series_100 ft. buffer Disclaimer: II is understood that the dais displayed through this application is subject to constant change slid that its accuracy cannot he guaranteed. The maps have been created from information provided by various govemmeni and private sources at various levels et accuracy. The dais is provided 1. you as is vriihno warranty, represenlalion or guaranty as to the content, sequence. accuracy, timeliness or completeness of any orlhe N inrmmalion provided herein. Il is the responsibility of the user of The dais to he aware of the w - F data's Ilmtiations and to utilize the data in an appropriate manner. S Feet 0 70 140 280 Date: 3/2512016 1"2.257 i i i' �I .. q!;. rn �u � � f � S oV loEo 2 c2 o cu O ui U) U _ (D Q> N U U U O W O , a 11 o N r o L ?'ft .� � U N d c0 O 2 .. o f - \ E O C 'C N U tll 6 N ——— ! m Q Z Q O N ) =;o Z a -` m 0 O iN 'o a� 'oug a� Q N o N Ln2 r' S .N o o m n oU ?, �`. CL o C X Q O Q O x mO) 2 m i i i' .. q!;. rn � � o oV loEo 2 c2 o cu O ui U) U _ (D Q> N U U U O W O , a 11 o N r o L ?'ft .� � U N d c0 O 2 .. o f - \ E O C 'C N U tll 6 N ——— ! m Q Z Q O N ) =;o Z a -` m 0 O iN 'o a� 'oug a� Q N o N Ln2 S .N o o m n oU ?, �`. CL o C X Q O Q O x mO) 2 m s`e Do nn Q U- W d 0- H Q ` 9 U CO N U N U U U N CVN U U U i i i r j ,i i rn O 5; S a) O = 1 o O - o o O o_ ca LD 0 O ui C ° O Q U U U O W __ O 6 5 a C3 E do r L C U N U (1) O 2 T E o o o N N .. E _ n E (6 Z Q 'E p O N U) D 3 m (7 _ c� i6 1" U o Q t N Z N N a 'L d o (o N (U O C Q N Q 0 Q X (U N CL Q LL W d 2 d H Q n`s, w F - U � Z H H U Z Z H H .i U i rn CLO 0 } \ 2 2 O S > \ cu 0 ui N - (D �t _ Q > U)O , a �� o N� L •� N U d O o E ._ -r-.. C Cc:)U) N i C7 m E N 'C N U (l - ai -` Z Q U N 'o '0 Z Ln N m a v .2 a� a� Q o ug rn S .N U o o �6 U) ?s o Q Q N CL C X o o X H m Donn ` Q LL W d d Q 9 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. G.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: April 26, 2016 Ordinance accepting and appropriating $100,000 from the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) for the purpose of locally administering the improvement of the drainage system at Kenwick Trail, Belle Meade Drive and Merriman Road; Cave Spring Magisterial District Brian Carter Financial Analyst Thomas C. Gates County Administrator Appropriation of $100,000 in VDOT funding for Kenwick Trail, Belle Meade Drive, and Merriman Road drainage projects. BACKGROUND: On October 14, 2014, the Board of Supervisors approved a resolution supporting an application for $500,000 of matching transportation funding through the VDOT fiscal year 2015-2016 Revenue Sharing Program. Stormwater projects in the area of Kenwick Trail, Belle Meade Drive and Merriman Road were requested and approved for Revenue Sharing funds. Project improvements are within the public right-of-ways. DISCUSSION: The Kenwick Trail project includes installation of inlets and storm -sewer pipe to alleviate flooding at the intersection of Hartley Circle and adjacent homes. The estimated cost for this project is $50,000. Belle Meade Drive drainage improvements provide for installation of inlets and storm sewer pipes crossing Belle Meade Drive, and drainage improvements in the existing drainage easement. The estimated cost for this project is $50,000. Page 1 of 2 Merriman Road drainage improvements include installation of inlets and storm sewer pipes along Merriman Road from the intersection with Sunny Side Drive to the intersection with Springlawn Avenue and discharging into a tributary of Mudlick Creek. The estimated cost for this project is $100,000. FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of these projects is estimated to be $200,000 of which $100,000 is currently appropriated under the County stormwater maintenance of effort CIP project. This action appropriates VDOT Revenue Sharing funds in the amount of $100,000 to fully fund the projects. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the first reading of this ordinance and scheduling of the second reading on May 10, 2016. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 2016 ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING $100,000 FROM THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (VDOT) FOR THE PURPOSE OF LOCALLY ADMINISTERING THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM AT KENWICK TRAIL, BELLE MEADE DRIVE AND MERRIMAN ROAD, CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on October 14, 2014 the Board of Supervisors approved a resolution supporting an application of $500,000 of matching transportation funding through VDOT 2015-2016 revenue sharing program; and WHEREAS, the Kenwick Tail, Belle Meade Drive and Merriman Road projects were projects under this program; and WHEREAS, a determination was made that these will be locally administered projects; and WHEREAS, $200,000 of the projects is within the VDOT right-of-way and is eligible for a 50/50 revenue sharing grant; and WHEREAS, $100,000 of the project budget will be funding from VDOT with a match of $100,000 provided from the stormwater maintenance of effort funding; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter provides that funds be appropriated by ordinance; and WHEREAS, first reading of this ordinance was held on April 26, 2016, and the second reading was held on May 10, 2016. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows.. 1. That the sum of $100,000 is hereby appropriated for the purpose of Page 1 of 2 improving the drainage system at Kenwick Trail, Belle Meade Drive and Merriman Road; and 2. That the sum of $100,000 is allocated from stormwater maintenance of effort funding for the purpose of improving the drainage system at Kenwick Trail, Belle Meade Drive and Merriman Road; and 3. That this ordinance shall take effect from and after the date of adoption. Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. G.2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: April 26, 2016 Ordinance to accept and appropriate $1,000 from the Appalachian Power Company in support of the Catawba Greenway Doug Blount Director of Parks Recreation and Tourism Thomas C. Gates County Administrator Appropriation of $1,000 from Appalachian Power Company in support of the Catawba Greenway. BACKGROUND: The Catawba Greenway is included in the 2007 Update to the Roanoke Valley Conceptual Greenway Plan as a connection between the National Forest, the Appalachian Trail (AT), the Catawba community, and the greater Roanoke Valley greenway system. This network of new trails proposed at the Virginia Tech Catawba Sustainability Center will provide connections between the AT, Catawba Center, Homeplace Restaurant, post office, and U.S. Bicycle Route 76. This will be the first trail in the Roanoke greenway system to serve a rural part of the community. In 2012, Roanoke County and Virginia Tech entered into a long term license agreement for the proposed trail system at the CSC with cooperation from the Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission, and the Pathfinders for Greenways. Roanoke County, in cooperation with Virginia Tech's Catawba Sustainability Center and greenway partners, plan this greenway as a trail system that supports economic development and enhances the quality of outdoor recreation amenities in the area. The trails will provide AT thru-hikers with a safer alternative for accessing the Catawba community, residents with a new hiking/birding facility, and tourists with expanded access to the popular McAfee Knob section of the AT. Page 1 of 2 DISCUSSION: The Appalachian Power Company has offered to donate $1,000 to Roanoke County for the Catawba Greenway project. The funds will be used for construction of the pedestrian bridge needed to cross Catawba Creek. FISCAL IMPACT: Revenue of $1,000 appropriated for the section of the Catawba Greenway at the Catawba Sustainability Center. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the first reading of this ordinance and scheduling of the second reading on May 10, 2016. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 2016 ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,000 FROM THE APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY TO THE CATAWBA GREENWAY WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission was formed in 1997 to plan and support a network of greenways and trails throughout the member localities; WHEREAS, the Catawba Greenway is included in the 2007 Update to the Roanoke Valley Conceptual Greenway Plan; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County and Virginia Tech have a partnership to construct a section of the Catawba Greenway at the Catawba Sustainability Center; and WHEREAS, the Appalachian Power Company has agreed to donate $1,000 to Roanoke County for a pedestrian bridge crossing of Catawba Creek; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter provides that funds be appropriated by ordinance; and WHEREAS, first reading of this ordinance was held on April 26, 2016, and the second reading was held on May 10, 2016. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows.. 1. That the sum of $1,000 is hereby appropriated from the Appalachian Power Company to the Department of Park, Recreation, and Tourism for the Catawba Greenway for the purpose of constructing a pedestrian bridge; and 2. That this ordinance shall take effect from and after the date of adoption. Page 1 of 1 March 21, 2016 H. Joseph Jones Appalachian Power P.O. Box 2021 Roanoke, VA 24022 Count of Roanoke OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR PO Box 29800, 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Re: Catawba Sustainability Center — AEP/Appalachian Power Donation for Pedestrian Bridge Dear Mr. Jones, On behalf of Roanoke County, thank you for agreeing to donate $1,000 for the pedestrian bridge proposed at the Catawba Sustainability Center. Your company's generous donation will go towards the materials costs related to the construction of a bridge crossing of Catawba Creek. The project is a partnership between Roanoke County, Virginia Tech, and the Pathfinders for Greenways volunteers who are building the trail and assisting with installation of the bridge. The proposed pedestrian bridge will serve as the first phase of the Catawba Greenway that will provide a connection between the National Forest and the Roanoke Valley Greenway system. The trail system proposed at the Catawba Sustainability Center will provide a critical link between the community and the Appalachian Trail. More specifically, the project will provide a safer alternative for hikers who are traveling through the Catawba community. Attached is the executed Nondiscrimination Certification Statement requested by Appalachian Power. The donation from Appalachian Power will require approval and acceptance from the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. This item is anticipated to be on the Board of Supervisors meeting agendas scheduled for April 26 and May 10, 2016. Following these meetings, Roanoke County will forward you a copy of the Board of Supervisors resolution related to the donation. Once you have received this correspondence, please send me written confirmation of AEP/APCO's willingness to provide this generous donation for the Catawba Greenway. For more information about the project proposed at the Catawba Sustainability Center, please visit the following website: http://www.cpe.vt.edu/sustainable/. If you have any additional questions or concerns, please contact me at (540) 772-2004 or tBates@roanokecountyva.gov. Sincerely, Thomas C. des County Administrator CC: Mr. Doug Blount, Roanoke County Director of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Mr. Josh Nease, Virginia Tech Catawba Sustainability Center Manager ACTION NO. ITEM NO. G.3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: April 26, 2016 Ordinance approving the sale of the former Vinton Library to Richard H. Macher and authorizing the execution of a contract of sale Jill Loope Director of Economic Development Thomas C. Gates County Administrator This is the first reading of an ordinance authorizing the sale of the former Vinton Library to Richard H. Macher for the purpose of establishing a Macado's restaurant at the property. BACKGROUND: The former Vinton Library was vacated by the County upon the completion and opening of the new Vinton library in November 2015. At the direction of the Board of Supervisors, the building and site were subsequently made available for public acquisition. In December of 2015, Roanoke County entered into a contract with Poe & Cronk Real Estate Group to provide commercial brokerage and marketing services for the 419 and Vinton libraries. The County received and accepted a proposal from Richard Macher to purchase the Vinton library property to establish a restaurant at this location. DISCUSSION: The Contract of Sale provides for a 60 day due diligence period, to include a County initiated rezoning of the property for the purchaser's intended use as a full service restaurant. Page 1 of 2 FISCAL IMPACT: As outlined in the Contract of Sale, Richard Macher proposes to acquire the property from Roanoke County in "as is" condition at a purchase price of $700,000. Following a detailed staff analysis, it was concluded that the sale of the property would net an immediate financial advantage to the County, while avoiding significant up -front capital investments that would be required to maintain and lease the property. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the first reading of this ordinance and scheduling the second reading and public hearing on May 10, 2016. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 2016 ORDINANCE APPROVING THE SALE OF THE OLD VINTON LIBRARY TO RICHARD H. MACHER AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT OF SALE WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors owns property located at 800 Washington Avenue, Vinton, Virginia 24179 consisting of one (1) parcel containing 1.27 acres previously used as the Vinton branch for the Roanoke County Public Library known as the "Old Vinton Library"; and WHEREAS, upon completion of the new Vinton Library in downtown Vinton, the Old Vinton Library was vacated and made available for public acquisition; and WHEREAS, THAT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISION OF Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property, having been made available for other public uses before permitting disposition by sale, is hereby declared to be surplus; and WHEREAS, that a Request for Proposals to engage a licensed real estate broker to aid and assist in the sale of the property was performed; and WHEREAS, Poe and Cronk, Inc. was selected and the same marketed and made the property available to the public by all advertising means available; and WHEREAS, Richard H. Macher submitted an Offer to Purchase the property to establish a full service restaurant for Macado's, Inc., which Offer the County accepted; and WHEREAS, a draft Contract of Sale has been prepared between the County and Richard H. Macher, providing for the purchase of the property in "AS IS" condition at a total purchase price of $700,000; and Page 1 of 2 WHEREAS, this ordinance authorizes the conveyance of the former Vinton Library located at 800 Washington Avenue to Richard H. Macher upon the terms and conditions set out in the above-mentioned Contract; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs the acquisition and conveyance of real estate interests be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 26, 2016, and the second reading and public hearing was held on May 10, 2016. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The subject property is hereby declared surplus, was properly advertised to the public and meets all legal requirements of disposal as required by the Roanoke County Charter and the Roanoke County Code; and 2. That the conveyance of a 1.27 acres parcel of real estate known as the former Vinton Library and located at 800 Washington Avenue (Tax Map Number 60.16- 06-32.00) to Richard H. Macher upon certain terms and conditions as set forth in a Contract of Sale, is hereby approved and authorized; and 3. That the County Administrator or Assistant County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of this real estate, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. H.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: April 26, 2016 Ordinance accepting and appropriating funds in the amount of $8,000 from the U.S. Marine Corps Reserve Unit and the Marine Corps League to Camp Roanoke from the 20th Annual Marine Mud Run Doug Blount Director of Parks Recreation and Tourism APPROVED BY: Thomas C. Gates County Administrator ISSUE: Appropriation of $8,000 received from U. S. Marine Corps Reserve Unit in support of the Marine Corps Mud Run BACKGROUND: In its 20th year, the Marine Corps Mud Run continues to be one of the Roanoke Valley's signature running and fundraising events. This event draws the interest of many individuals and its team competition has become popular with school groups, athletic teams and teams comprised of friends and neighbors. The event represents a long standing partnership among Roanoke Valley Detachment 426 of the Marine Corps League, Marine Corps Reserve Unit, Company B, 4th Combat Engineer Battalion, the Roanoke County Parks, Recreation and Tourism Department and many other corporate sponsors. The beneficiaries of this event are the nationally recognized Marine Toys for Tots program and Camp Roanoke. DISCUSSION: Funds will be used for ropes course improvements and repairs at Camp Roanoke. This year's $8,000 donation brings the total amount contributed for the twenty year period to over $158,200. Page 1 of 2 There have been no changes from the first reading held on April 12, 2016. FISCAL IMPACT: Revenue of $8,000 appropriated for Camp Roanoke. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this ordinance. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 2016 ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $8,000 FROM THE U. S. MARINE CORPS RESERVE UNIT AND THE MARINE CORPS LEAGUE TO CAMP ROANOKE FROM THE 20TH ANNUAL MARINE MUD RUN WHEREAS, Roanoke County and the Marine Corps League have a partnership to host the annual Marine Mud Run at Green Hill Park; and WHEREAS, The Mud Run is a fund raising event for the Marine Corps League and was held on September 19, 2015; and WHEREAS, The Marine Corps League makes an annual donation to Camp Roanoke for camp improvements. WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter provides that funds be appropriated by ordinance; and WHEREAS, first reading of this ordinance was held on April 12, 2016, and the second reading was held on April 26, 2016. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows.. 1. That the sum of $8,000 is hereby appropriated from the Marine Corps League to the Park, Recreation and Tourism department for Camp Roanoke for the purposes of ropes course improvements and repairs; and 2. That this ordinance shall take effect from and after the date of adoption. Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: All open appointments. BACKGROUND: April 26, 2016 Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards Deborah Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk Thomas C. Gates County Administrator 1. Board of Zoning Appeals (appointed by District) The Windsor Hills Magisterial District representative has passed away. Mr. Karr's five (5) -year term expires June 30, 2016. 2. Budget and Fiscal Affairs Committee (BFAC) (appointed by District and At - Large) The Budget and Fiscal Affairs Committee shall be comprised of eleven (11) members with each Board Supervisor having an appointment, five members appointed jointly by the Board of Supervisors, and one ex officio appointment representing County Administration. Mr. Gates is currently working with the Board on recommendations to this committee. 3. Clean Valley Council (At Large) Adam Cohen has resigned his appointment to the Clean Valley Counsel. His three- year term expired June 30, 2015. Page 1 of 2 4. Economic Development Authority (EDA) (appointed by District) The following four-year term expired on September 26, 2015: a) Greg Apostolou, representing the Hollins Magisterial District is eligible for reappointment DISCUSSION: There is no discussion associated with this agenda item. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: There is no staff recommendation associated with this agenda item. Page 2 of 2 J AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 2016 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I- CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for April 26, 2016, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6 inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of minutes — February 23, 2016 2. Request to accept and allocate funds in the amount of $2,736 to the Clerk of the Circuit Court from the Commonwealth of Virginia, for fiscal year 2015/2016 3. Confirmation of the appointment of Gregory Hamilton (At -Large) to the Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare Board of Directors 4. Request to accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $7,082 from the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services Virginia Victim -Witness Fund, federal Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) to the Commonwealth Attorney's Office 5. Resolution granting a waiver to the American Cancer Society and Relay for Life of Vinton under Section 13-23 of the Roanoke County Code to the provisions of the County's Noise Ordinance, Article II. Noise of Chapter 13. Offenses - Miscellaneous, Vinton Magisterial District 6. Confirmation of appointments to the Building Code Board of Appeals (Fire Code Board of Appeals) (At -Large) Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. J.2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: April 26, 2016 Request to accept and allocate funds in the amount of $2,736 to the Clerk of the Circuit Court from the Commonwealth of Virginia, for fiscal year 2015/2016 SUBMITTED BY: Rebecca Owens Director of Finance APPROVED BY: Thomas C. Gates County Administrator ISSUE: Request to accept and allocate funds in the amount of $2,736 to the Clerk of the Circuit Court from the Commonwealth of Virginia, for fiscal year 2015/2016. BACKGROUND: Technology Trust Funds are fees collected by the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office. DISCUSSION: Funds in the amount of $2,736 were received from the State and are earmarked for the purpose of maintenance needs for the Clerk of Circuit Court. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this item. All funds are provided by the Commonwealth of Virginia. Ordinance #052615-3 appropriated various grants donations, and other miscellaneous revenues for various functions and purposes that are routine and usual in nature for the 2015-2016 fiscal year. Funds in the amount of $2,736 are to be accepted and allocated to account 102817-5850. Page 1 of 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends allocating $2,736 to the Clerk of Circuit Court for the fiscal year 2015/2016. Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. J.3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: April 26, 2016 Confirmation of the appointment of Gregory Hamilton (At - Large) to the Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare Board of Directors Deborah Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk Thomas C. Gates County Administrator Ratification of an At -Large appointment to the Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare Board of Directors BACKGROUND: In accordance with the Bylaws of the Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare Board of Directors, all At -Large appointments are to be ratified by all four local governing bodies. DISCUSSION: Roanoke County has been advised by Debbie Bonniwell, Executive Director of Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare that Mr. Gregory Hamilton has been endorsed to serve an additional three-year term as an At -Large member that will expire December 31, 2018. Ms. Bonniwell has requested ratification by all four localities. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends ratification of this appointment. Page 1 of 1 Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare March 29, 2016 Mr. Thomas C. Gates County Administrator Roanoke County 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke, VA 24.018 Dear Mr. Gates: Executive Director Debbie Bonniwell According to our Board records, the partial term of Mr. Greg Hamilton as an at -large representative on the Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare Board of Directors expired on December 31, 2015. This Board nominates it's at -large representatives, and asks the participating governing bodies to ratify those appointments. We have appreciated Mr. Hamilton's dedication to our mission, and would very much like to have him continue to serve as an At -Large member. At our December 10, 2015 Board meeting, the Board unanimously endorsed Mr. Hamilton to serve an additional term as an at -large member for which he is eligible according to Title 37.2 - 502 of the Code of Virginia. We respectfully request that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ratify the reappointment of Mr. Hamilton for his first full term, from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2018. This request is being sent concurrently to administrators in each of our other four local governing bodies for their ratification of at -large members as called for in our By-laws. If I can be of assistance in this process or if you have any questions that I may be helpful with, please do not hesitate to contact me at 540-345-9841 at your convenience. Sincerely, r Debbie Bonniwell, MBA, MSSW, LCSW Chief Executive Officer C: The Honorable P. Jason Peters, Chair, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Ms. Donna Henderson Mr. Greg Hamilton Executive Offices 301 Elm Avenue 5W Roanoke, Virginia 24016-4001 (540) 345-9841 Fax (540) 527-2900 The Community Services Board serving the Cities of Roanoke and Salem, and the Counties of Botetourt, Craig and Roanoke ACTION NO. ITEM NO. J.4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: April 26, 2016 Request to accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $7,082 from the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services Virginia Victim -Witness Fund, federal Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) to the Commonwealth Attorney's Office Rebecca Owens Director of Finance Thomas C. Gates County Administrator Accept Victim Witness Program grant funds in the amount of $7,082. BACKGROUND: The Roanoke County Victim Witness Program provides comprehensive information and direct services to crime victims and witnesses in accordance with the Crime Victim and Witness Rights Act and other applicable victim rights' laws. DISCUSSION: The Department of Criminal Justice Services awarded the Roanoke County Commonwealth's Attorney's Victim Witness Program a 15% increase in the Victim - Witness Fund, federal Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) funding, to be used for enhancing victim services. Grant funding increased from $47,214 to $54,296. FISCAL IMPACT: Federal funds in the amount of $7,082 will need to be allocated from the grant account to the Victim Witness Grant for fiscal year 2016. No County matching funds are required for this grant. Page 1 of 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the acceptance and allocation of grant funds to the Commonwealth's Attorney's Office Victim Witness Program in the amount of $7,082. Page 2 of 2 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Department of Criminal Justice Services 1100 Bank Street Francine C. Ecker Richmond, Virginia 23219 Director (804) 786-4600 February 4, 2016 TDD (804) 386-8732 REVISE Mr. Thomas C. Gates County Administrator Roanoke County P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 RE: Grant No.: 16-V8561 VG15 Revised Victim Witness Program Award Dear Mr. Gates: The original grant award information, dated July 13, 2015, has been revised to reflect an increase in the total amount of awarded funds for Fiscal Year 2016. The additional amount has been added to the Supplies/Other Budget Category. Please submit a revised budget as outlined in the email dated January 20, 2016 from John Mahoney. Enclosed you will find a "revised' Statement of Grant Award and a Statement of Grant Award Special Conditions. To indicate your acceptance of the award and conditions, please sign the award acceptance and return it to Janice Waddy, Grants Administrator, at the Department of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS). Please review the conditions carefully; as some require action on your part before we will disburse grant funds. We apologize for any inconvenience and will be happy to assist you in any way we can to assure your project's success. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Patricia Foster at (804) 371-8634. Sincerely, IA-), J Janice Waddy Grants Administrator Enclosures cc: Ms. Anne A. Jones, V/W Program Director Ms. Rebecca E. Owens, Finance Director Ms. Patricia Foster, DCJS Monitor Criminal Justice Service Board • Committee on Training • Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice Advisory Committee to Court Appointed Special Advocate and Children's Justice Act Programs Private Security Services Advisory Board • Criminal Justice Information Systems Committee www-dcjs-virginia-gov 'p A REVISE" Department of Criminal Justice Services 1100 Bank Street, 12th Floor, Richmond, VA 23219 Statement of Grant Award/Acceptance Subgrantee: Roanoke County Date: February 05, 2016 Grant Period: Grant Number: From: 07/01/2015 Through: 06/30/2016 16-V8561 VG15 Project Director Project Administrator Finance Officer Ms. Anne A. Jones Mr. Thomas C. Gates Ms. Rebecca E. Owens V/W Program Director County Administrator Finance Director Roanoke County Roanoke County Roanoke County 305 E. Main Street, Rm 202 P. O. Box 29800 P. O. Box 29800 Salem, VA 24153 Roanoke, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24018 Phone: (540) 387-6181 Phone: (540) 772-2004 Phone: (540) 772-2020 Email: AJONES®roanokecountyva.gov Email: tgates@roanokecountyv&gov Email: rowens aroanokccountyva.gov Grant Award Budget Budget Categories DCJS Funds Federal General Special Local TOTALS Trak -0 $0 $it y(] $tJ Vl Supplics,`Other $7,082 $0 $t] $0 $7,082 Personnel $ti 5-I' 214 $0 so 547,214 Jndircct Cost [1 S0 S0 S0 $0 Equipmeni S0 SU $[J $0 $41 C crnsuhmt !�0 ti t l $[] $0 $0 Totals '.$7,082 547,214[) $i] 51.'€ib This grant is subject to all rules, regulations, and criteria included in the grant guidelines and the special conditions attached thereto. Francine C. Ecker, Director The undersigned, having received the Statement of Grant Award/Acceptance and the Co ditions attached thereto, does hereby accept this grant and agree to the conditions pertaining thereto, this day of , 20 Signature: Title: ACTION NO. ITEM NO. J.5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: April 26, 2016 Resolution granting a waiver to the American Cancer Society and Relay for Life of Vinton under Section 13-23 of the Roanoke County Code to the provisions of the County's Noise Ordinance, Article II. Noise of Chapter 13. Offenses - Miscellaneous, Vinton Magisterial District Deborah Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk Thomas C. Gates County Administrator Approval of a noise ordinance waiver for the American Cancer Society and Relay for Life of Vinton per Section 13-23 of the Roanoke County Code. BACKGROUND: The American Cancer Society and Relay for Life of Vinton are planning an annual Relay for Life fundraiser at William Byrd High School beginning at 5:00 p.m. on Friday, May 6, 2016, and ending at 12:00 a.m. on Saturday, May 7, 2015. The County noise ordinance now prohibits noise as follows: Section 13-21 (5) Operating or permitting the use or operation of any instrument, machine or any other device for the production of sound at a volume sufficient to be plainly audible through partitions common to two (2) residences within a building or plainly audible at fifty (50) feet or more from such device or its source. This waiver would allow music and announcements overnight for this event. Page 1 of 2 The attached resolution grants this waiver of the noise ordinance and authorizes the music and announcements to be made from 5:00 p.m. on May 6, 2016, to 12:00 a.m. on May 7, 2016. DISCUSSION: The Board of Supervisors has annually approved a noise ordinance waiver for this event since 2012. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this request. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution. Page 2 of 2 American Cancer Society 2840 Electric Road, Suite 106 Roanoke, VA 24018 January 27, 2016 Board of Supervisors of Roanoke 5204 Bernard Dr Fourth Floor Roanoke, VA 24018 To Whom it May Concern: The Relay For Life of Vinton, a fundraiser for the American Cancer Society held in Vinton located in Roanoke County, will be holding its annual Relay For Life event at William Byrd High School for the Town of Vinton, Roanoke County, and the general public on Friday, May 6, 2016 from 5:00 PM to 12:00 AM Saturday, May 7, 2016. Relay For Life is held at night to represent the journey of a cancer patient, and stress that cancer continues to exist even when the sun has set. In order to accommodate this atmosphere and bring the community together in the fight against cancer, the Relay For Life of Vinton is requesting a waiver of the Roanoke County noise ordinance for five hours from 5:00 PM on Friday May 6, 2016 to 12:00 AM, Saturday, May 7, 2016. We have the capacity to control the volume of the music and announcements; however we would greatly appreciate not having to turn them off completely. The music and announcements keep the participants engaged at the event, and help to discourage them from leaving early. The money raised through Relay For Life is making a difference in the lives of cancer patients everywhere. Thanks in part to donations collected all across the United States of America, the American Cancer Society has helped to save 11 million cancer patients. Locally the money raised helps fund patient services such as free wigs, free rides to and from treatment, free breast cancer and prostate cancer support group, and to help keep our free 1-800 number available all day, every day. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Courtney Baker American Cancer Society Community Manager Angie Chewning Lewis American Cancer Society, Event Lead AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 2016 RESOLUTION GRANTING A WAIVER TO THE AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY AND RELAY FOR LIFE OF VINTON UNDER SECTION 13-23 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COUNTY'S NOISE ORDINANCE, ARTICLE II. "NOISE" OF CHAPTER 13. "OFFENSES -MISCELLANEOUS" WHEREAS, Relay For Life of Vinton, a fundraiser for the American Cancer Society, will be holding its annual overnight Relay For Life event at William Byrd High School for the Town of Vinton, Roanoke County, and the general public on Friday, May 6, 2016, from 5:00 p.m. to Saturday, May 7, 2016, at 12:00 a.m.; and WHEREAS, Relay for Life is held overnight to represent the journey of a cancer patient, and stress that cancer continues to exist even when the sun has set. In order to accommodate this atmosphere and bring the community together in the fight against cancer, American Cancer Society and Relay For Life of Vinton are requesting a waiver of the Roanoke County noise ordinance from 5:00 p.m. on Friday, May 6, 2016, to 12:00 a.m. on Saturday, May 7, 2015; and WHEREAS, Section 13-23 of the Roanoke County Code establishes certain standards for the Board of Supervisors to grant waivers from the provision of the Roanoke County noise ordinance to avoid undue hardship upon consideration of certain factors set forth in sub -section (b) of Section 13-23 and after making certain alternative findings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: Page 1 of 2 1. That the provisions of Section 13-21. Specific acts as noise, sub -section (5) and Section 13-20. General prohibition of Article II. Noise be waived from 5:00 p.m., May 6, 2016, to 12:00 a.m., May 7, 2015. 2. That this waiver is granted specifically to The American Cancer Society and Relay for Life of Vinton for the Relay for Life fundraiser at William Byrd High School on May 6-7, 2016. Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. J.6 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: April 26, 2016 Confirmation of appointments to the Building Code Board of Appeals (Fire Code Board of Appeals) (At -Large) Deborah Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk Thomas C. Gates County Administrator Confirmation of appointments. BACKGROUND: Several appointments to the Fire Code Board of Appeals will expire by the end of April 2016. Additionally, one member of this Board will retire and has tendered his resignation effective May 31, 2016. DISCUSSION: Staff has recommended the following appointments: David Jones renewal of four-year term to expire April 27, 2020 Peter Fields renewal of a four-year term to expire January 24, 2020 Richard Evans renewal of a four-year term to expire April 13, 2020 Justin Biller has been recommended to fill the unexpired term of David Shelton from June 1, 2016 through September 23, 2017. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. Page 1 of 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of all appointments. Page 2 of 2 GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount Audited balance at June 30, 2015 $ 21,799,195 Appropriated from 2015-2016 budget 506,153 % of General Fund Revenue 11.00% * Balance at April 26, 2016 $ 22,305,348 11.01 % ** Note: On December 21, 2004, the Board of Supervisors adopted a policy to increase the General Fund Unappropriated Balance incrementally over several years. * 2014-15 - Goal of 11 % of General Fund Revenues 2014-15 General Fund Revenues $198,174,499 11 % of General Fund Revenues $21,799,195 ** 2015-16 - Goal of 11 % of General Fund Revenues 2015-16 General Fund Revenues $202,656,326 11% of General Fund Revenues $22,292,196 The Unappropriated Fund Balance of the County is currently maintained at the goal of 11.00%. Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By Thomas C. Gates County Administrator COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL RESERVES Minor County Capital Reserve (Projects not in the CIP, architectural/engineering services, and other one-time expenditures.) Audited balance at June 30, 2015 Appropriated for 2015-16 Capital budget July 28, 2015 Appropriation to purchase voting machines and equipment November 10, 2015 Allocation from expenditures for year end close out June 30, 2015 Balance at April 26, 2016 Maior Countv Caaital Reserve Amount $ 1,586,627 (907,344) (384,000) 649,431 $ 944,714 (Projects in the CIP, debt payments to expedite projects identified in CIP, and land purchase opportunities.) Audited balance at June 30, 2015 $ 2,614,612 Appropriated for 2015-16 Capital budget (1,583,412) November 10, 2015 Allocation from revenues for year end close out June 30, 2015 $1,631,084 Balance at April 26, 2016 $ 2,662,284 Technoloav Caaital Reserve (Projects identified and prioritized by the Technology Governance Committee and approved by the County Administrator.) Audited balance at June 30, 2015 $ 314,058 Allocation to Computer Replacement Account (100,000) Balance at April 26, 2016 $ 214,058 Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By Thomas C. Gates County Administrator RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount From 2015-2016 Original Budget $ 50,000 November 10, 2015 Appropriated funds to initiate the Intervenor process and develop strategy (15,000) Submitted By Approved By Balance at April 26, 2016 $ 35,000 Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Thomas C. Gates County Administrator COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CHANGES IN OUTSTANDING DEBT Changes in outstanding debt for the fiscal year to date were as follows Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By Thomas C. Gates County Administrator Outstanding Outstanding June 30, 2015 Additions Deletions April 26, 2016 General Obligation Bonds $ 5,332,236 $ - $ - $ 5,332,236 VPSA School Bonds 104,311,123 7,761,248 96,549,875 State Literary Loans 1,825,775 - 1,825,775 - Lease Revenue Bonds 76,949,408 - 955,424 75,993,984 Capital Lease obligation 741,516 - 741,516 - $ 189,160,058 $ - $ 11,283,963 - $ 177,876,095 Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By Thomas C. Gates County Administrator - � o d u b 7 C a} m � N w O N n a1 e P P. Q t1 C O t4 M LO > T 1 J N ti 3 M V a Ln 1- N �r d O � Ln C o O N ti 3 d N m d C C d d M M CO V N r 1- CO N O M ti r M O M CD M ti N N Lq V Liz ti ti M M M O N N � M N 7 C9 N M M CO N V r r r N O M N O O O M M Li 1 M M M m CD N r O O N ti i i O N (D co ti m � N M n O M O r M n T w N ti Ln M M Ln 1- Ln Ln O ti M 't O M O to O to CD Ln O ti M to ti CD N N ti M M M CD 117 O M M N V M (D M 00 M M C O ti C! ti Ln r In M co CD 00 M ti O M M 00 O m co 00 to In O co M O0 L? r m r Ln M CD M co M r- O M r co N co N m a co r M O O N N V M � r LCJ M O ti � O O O 't Ln O CV O oc� O O �t O O V N O N Ln w co co r co O M r (D Ln M (D N (D 00t` M O co N co co O ti m co M O O M N f� M O N N M � O V Liz Q; M ti LD M O N M Ln M ti as CD M Ln 06 M Ln O O to M O M M M N r- 1- CO (O (O to ti CO Ln CO M r r N r Ln ti 00 00 N �t a0 N Ln M N O O � Ln �t O � O M co 1.- O co N V M Ln M M m (D M Ln N r N M W M M W 00 M (D V V m Ln M O O LCJ O Ln M V LCJ C M Ln LCi CO M M t` N r co N co (D M O a0 M M CO M Cl) O O ti M O m ti O V co O O N � CO M M O (fl W Liz O M N M O Ln Ln o0 Ln M V m co CO of M r r M N co N Lil N N In O O O O In O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ln Ln O N O m N O O O O O O O O O O O r Ln O to O � � O m M (fl C C O O C O O C O O C (D W O LL7 O M M O M N Ln co O O 00 ti LO O Ln M O Ln O O W� CO Ln 00 N Ln co co M Ln 7 (D Cl) L-- O N M Ln N Ln 7 LO f: M 00 M r f� N N M ti M 00 r to M CC M V N N Ln O O cm V ti r N N M O M (D N r r v W M M Ln M Ni r- �t M M �t M M M (D r ti Ln N N O N r V V N N 00 N Cl) O 00 O Ln O (D O r 00 V N O M W O 4 O M O O M M 4 00 M ti -i N ti N M M O r-: M LO O � LO --t (D (D (D M ' N Ln ti (D (D (fl O M Ln ti O M r (Q ti Ln r M r M M M co O � � (D M O M N P- M N M Ln M O 00 00 ti LS 1 Ln ti r Ln r V M M M O M Cl) 00 O N ti ti O N M O O r N M W VM W Ln r M N V r M Lq ti co (D LO ti O 00 V V 00 V M L- V 00 O N O Ln Ln V M LO LO N OJ N N O N N M m V Ln M M O Cl) r V V N V M M CD LA M M Ln O V 00 V CO Ln ti M r co r N a N (D N (O N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O LO LO O O O O Ln O O O Lc) O O O O O O O O O O O O O ti ti m N C M_ O C C M C C C C C O C C C C O C O M M L Ln N O O O 00 M O O Liz O O O M O M to V Ln M N O O M Ln M CD M CO O r- O Ln Ln N V Ll- N m O1 co r 1- O O N N V M � r LCJ M O ti � O O O 't Ln O O O oc� O O �t O O M O N O O N M O Cl) O N r r O0 co r Cl)M T Cl) a) OL 0 NN x - U) C O U x H N C a) J C CO cn LL N C U J a) U i CQ O "a O CJ O x O O rn x p y _ co C x co m O o a) a) LL F-- O_ N U a O x m U m K L6 a) CL ~ O 0 O m J H m d L od c w cuN U) c U) ) a,L a L . � o.2t E d a) N N l6 m C ,d V R O N M N N N N N O O O O O Cl) U) x C Cx6 O w U C U) E C O L) O U J x - U) C O U x H N C a) J C CO x ~ C LL LL N C U J a) U i CQ O "a O CJ O x O m H 0 C: U � rn x p y _ U) LL -0 O CL x N 6 xFj F- O N CO N L L O Q y a) LL C: L6 O J _ N 0- o a) a) LL Ui a) LL Q O ` m U cn CD 12 M U OL O UE O o L a_ La O R F N N N N N N N N N N H OM M M co Cl) m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N � o d v +T-' C b 7 E R - •R z� w O n N N e P P. Q () C R N N N N N JCOa C w y LL w £ IL R 3 i U- C R N R C Li N co o _N O N E O O c > N Df Q O a) O U c > N D V a N UO n o rn N 0) f6 U NU) mU) U N U)N U o fn a) zm C6 L U O O w N r d O C6 D) O -O Cn L -0C6 E N o c N > U o _ O U � N N > OU N of C o 70cn _N m U c O Z N X LL1 -0 N O [A U N i N U') � N O O R 3 N U > O U.) U O N w N 3: M - LL O (6 O w 70 7C Q_U O � O U y LL L C O aR fn d N m � R R R G) al R 7 C W 3 C R d > } N C y � O H R m � OO V V V M N V 00 V � a M O m r Ln •� -6 O O (D r (D •iSi C R O 00 a1 � � O a O r 3 O O O O LU O to m a O O O4- c O 0 o 4- y +" a 3 o rn O L u=i R 6 C y 0 R m O U fA o d al > w N r i LL � d d 7 C d C Q } > E O 0! O - U a` G1 7 m O co M 00 N O h LO O V co O V O 00 (D O m Ln O V M Itt W CL) Lf) (O N V (9 O N V Ln of N M V h N W O W O It N m O O m O O ti (D M 00 r 00 O O O 00 ti N N N M r N r V ' r O ti i lC) r (D r (D N m O h h Ln m h Ln (D V V LD r r M (O O N Ln h co Ln N co m (o N m �t M O h O h D) CD h h Ln M o0 (D N O M O M m N O 't M h N N NCD Ln LD ti m ti O m M 4 O M h O O M N r M r D1 r 't m r M M Ln h co M LLn m h co N h Ln O N M h m LO M m (O O LO Lt'J CO Ln Ln O m MM N O M m M M Cp M V Lf) V M O m r O m LO Ln m m co M to M (O N CO CO h m co D) N N m O m �t O O V h h 00 N 00 N c0 m N O O CD N Lf7 In r N M 00N O m O co le O 00 V N O M N (D m M (D L70 V Ln m O1 m (D O Lf It (Dr r c0 M N V co h 00 m m M m h co N m O N LO r O N Ln N h h M m Ln h N (D N co O LO co M r r LO ICJ N N r O O �t V N M N N r M N r M N O O O O O r O O O co co O) O 00 V m O O O O L[) O O O O O co N Ln O co co O O h LO (D O (O to CT) Ln LO O N N o0 Of o0 Ln c0 r O O (D m O Ln N (D to OM h In co m D1 co 00 O m m h m In N r M O h h In (D 00 O Ln N O Ln h N M 4•) Lf) 4•) r O C Ln r Ln M N m h m N LO V (D m O 00 00 O N 't W �t m co N LO (D �t O O O r h N (D 00 m V V O CO 00 Ln m CD co h O m O O to N O O M -i LC) m h O Co O O r m -;j O Ln M O O a O (D (D (D h ti (D M tD M h N Ln (D m h 00 O O r r (fl r It M M N M M Ln O CO O co co LC) GD �t M M r r w M h to O h ti M h — M N N m M M CD m O) M Ln O) 00 h - L M Ln M h Ln h V m V V N CD co Cl) (D h M N 00 (D 00 W m - m (D N V 1{") L[)h r M V N h � co N M V � N (D r V M 1C) V V LO LA N 0 h N V m to N N co N r N O O O O O O M m O Lb O (D r h 00 Ln N m O O r DL CD O O O O O 00 h O O coLn Lco O O m (O O M CD O Ln L77 O h h o0 h (fl M Ln m N h GO O m O M N r O co M m (D (D Ln 00 Ln O co 00 (D O Ln V 00 CD N N LO h Cl) Ln co M CD CO h Ln h V ti LC) (D (D r — co 1, Ln r Ln N 00 ;t m N r Ln M Cl) — �t N r Cl) N L-5 +T-' E z� T N N N N N JCOa C w y LL w £ IL al N `C ) (6 a) O i U- C R N R C Li N co o _N O N E O O c > N Df Q O a) O U c > N D r N r T y C O c y N UO n o rn N 0) f6 U NU) mU) U N U)N U o fn a) zm C6 L U O O w L In w CO) R tL.l C6 D) O -O Cn L -0C6 E N o c N > U o _ O U � N N > OU N of N 3 O C R -Z An 70cn _N m U c O Z N X LL1 -0 N O [A U N i N U') � N O .- Q U O M �, +a (n L O N U > O U.) U O N w N 3: M - LL O (6 O w 70 7C Q_U O � O U y LL L C O aR fn R R R R R R O H m M O H OO V V H N V 00 V h co O H O m r Ln co Ln O H O (D r (D (D M h O 00 N 00 CO O 00 H O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O L-5 C) O co Cl) o O In Lq C) O N V O O Il- ti O CD O N N N O � � N M O O O O O O O O N O O M C) O r O O o O M N N O O O Cl) O Lr LC1 N9 CD O N 00 OD N N O N N (7 Cf Lrj LCJ ti N N co co Cl) O O O N N O O V LC1 N9 CD O 00 OD D]aD V O N N (7 W Lrj LCJ M N N N C:) O w rn u) 0 o m OD rn 0 o ri vi v O O ti ti co co OC) O O LC1 N9 N N WY 00 OD D]aD V O N N (7 M r CO W co N N co L-5 ti co co m O aD 0 O N LC1 N9 O O 01 00 OD D]aD M N N p] OD N9 CO W O N N CD N L-5 N U 7 O U) N of C 3 U O C y C_ C i LL C.7 N C U) L .. O LL n N N O7 s i � o r R m = m rn H rn H CD 0 0 L-5 �L CT W M CO r O N O M M V LO N O M CD m V r— N co m O V ib CD N O CO m M N r M N V O O V LC) V CO 171 11 N CO 11 M N M N O r-� O r` O N M LS 1 117 M M N m M r r co N V LO r O LO N ti O V m t tp ti r N O co M ti M M O M co co O M N 00 O O O In M N 1- f� O M m O O 1` O O N N O O ti OL O M N W O ti r` Of r` LO m w 17 O 't co co LO 4 177 W O r` N M Ln O LO M O m O N r-- O O N O GO M M N O O LO M Ln co O ti LO M co CD 't O M T m C? N N N N LS -1 II 00 1� O LO N co m 1— N O O p M O a0 m LO p O N -;T rl.- CR lCO M O Cp 1l rl O r CO 00 O) W N CO r V� M N O) M CO V O r I O N r N co N r- 117 M Il- ti N M � N LO M M 117 M M O V 1 ti ti W ti O O t` ti M M ti M O W I M ti O I O O aD O rl- LO p co LO M M't co m N w r` O N � r` N CO O O CD 1� O'tNt Co 't O1 co co ti 't 't O M O O O I- O M W ti N O O O co N f- M ? r- OD N M O N CD Q? O CO Liz CD Cfl M O N Liz M - co O N Lf7 CD V LO �i C6 C6 O LO N O O co V LO r O co O O O LO co O O V LO O O r M M M N co LO O M ti Ln V M N M CD O 00 ~ M ti V V -e M M M V ti N V Lf) co N ll:� co Lf) to r O O Lrj N M M r r cn Cfl M .J W r C r r M r = f� co O p O V M V co co O w r co LO O m In w rl- V O O1 to co Co 't In co 't ti 't O O M co O N I- M m W O N rl- O O co O M M aD r- O_ aD O M M O O V CO 00 r- Cfl M Cfl N Liz M N O O N rl- CD V LO CD N CD 1—ti O m m LO N O V m co V LO r O' co 1l- N O O V M CD m V O O ti LO M Il- V ti ti O r ti t` N M N M CD V co t0 r LO O O -e V O M O r` C9 V N O N Liz N V wi N M r V r ib CO M M M r r N r Cfl M .J O N r LO 07 't r` M co M N N M M M O w m O co i LO m O N r CD fl O CC ti N V r r h O r M LO N M I o0 CD r r M M r N M O M M' M O LO N N N O Liz SD O O M ti O ti ti O (D ti r` ti ti ti tD ti LO r` O W p ti LL7 N Q1 r N M N 00 LO CD N V O O M V N7 m O O O O V co LO 1- O r LO O t` V V M M O M r I- r- co ti r M O N N O N O N M O_ M M ti CD O ~ O N W ti co rD r CO M O O co V V N N M co NV O Ln W O m O M O N M m O 1-:C LO Ln (6O co m O r r r N O r O ti N7 r` O N't O CD N7 Lo m co ti 1C1'J Ln LO r O N M O co ti r M r CD Ln M 1-- M LO r` ti N M m r Liz V wi N O O LO N M M r Qf V N .J ~ r M M Q1 V O Cv) O (37 N M M M M CO m LO V O t` LO f� N p p O M ti O rp V CO LO V M rb LO O � O N N I� M IfJ 1� O O 1` M M m O 1` M Cfl N M N LO 67 M M LO 00 N O co N O LO LO m O 00 O M O m LO W M co Ln N r co co N V M M ti N7 Lf) M O m N7 O co 74 _ co co r CD N 't CD 00 LO M w N M Lo r- 00N M N 1� co N co V W CO LO V N M LO N .J CD N C r r M r = C O R a) a) d' m a O CD O R NC � w E U O C O cn O E 74 a w N O 6 'C 'C a .J C O = CD f6 0 a� CL CL C Q 0 d a C U) a) 7 m U R U) C in w C _ .L O m () l6 N T O C O) a) �i 00 O O -O U a) C C O a) w a) UD T a C , Y t5 i .� O i '6 C O 0 m ?> 2 U) ) SO W W N N Q a) U U N rn r6 t C O (D C 3 L "6 �_ p 9 p a) a) O O C a) N i6 C: N is J( W 0 0 ' J LL U Q a U` W a d U) d U) _ N CO N N M �* N M �t M M �t CD 00 O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N co co M co CD V V V V V CD LO LO Liz LO O O O O O N O O O O cn O O O O O O O O O 1Ln O O O O O C O R a) a) d' m a O CD O �L C, 't In O M m V tD r- (D M N O O O N It co V ti V LO M Ln V (9 LO M O O O O LO ti M V V M O w O 7 N O O O IV O LTJ V N M O to Lo 0D M O O M (fl m (fl O O O co O co N M O V O N O O O m w Q1 MIn N rN u? O lS7 W W u? CD O O M CD O O C. o a w I? CO N (`7 M It V II m N ti O r- rl- m w m O 7 m m O O ti CO p {�ID) M p M O O7 Ln Ip CO M (9 Ln O O ti V N p m N O O N' m Ln m m (D V r - O m ti V ti m ti m (fl � V M N (fl � O CD O M m tv N � tD m U O O N ti O 0 C O R ti m O O ,�t o O eF O m N i In M O N M O O 't d � v M N U m b» y M C ti � Q � Q (fl R •L O M t°? (fl N O m mQf T O �i N N m O r� m _ LO M M M O V M a0+ U a ( M CD £ o < M� En w CD O. v = Z M N u N Ln K C R m C M co W W W M R L In 00 c R tD �C co co C LO O co N 3 o m m r u = = co w N � c W O °i C co m «S 3 R - E E O. R O C E N N M Ln N a v L cm i+ x C 3 Vl = C W W > c m _ E o c d � r V d a M Do t6 a? a? c oW X m > o > d dl c ,� rn Q7 Z7 i m 00 m L � Q N c U m N a a Q c Y C = a w O R W E m m 3 a O 06 > r o w N N IL N E O r w= H O = : 3 0 Z +T+ 3 m c O 1� C X R W W N C G I m 0 R V U Gci a m z3 m o N C E N O O A N w N N m rR+ O c L U i � LL c 3 R oc E L w � 5� N E = E ❑ r L r LQ y 3 R O aL U W W CL E m a as O in U Y m O OU O E d x to N a C 7 U a a U m �L C, 't In O M m V tD r- (D M N O O O N It co V ti V LO M Ln V (9 LO M O O O O LO ti M V V M O w O 7 N O O O IV O LTJ V N M O to Lo 0D M O O M (fl m (fl O O O co O co N M O V O N O O O m w Q1 MIn N rN u? O lS7 W W u? CD O O M CD O O C. o a w I? CO N (`7 M It V II m N ti O r- rl- m w m O 7 m m O O ti CO p {�ID) M p M O O7 Ln Ip CO M (9 Ln O O ti V N p m N O O N' m Ln m m (D V r - O m ti V ti m ti m (fl � V M N (fl � O CD O M m N co O tD m O O r. -O ti O O ti O O O ,�t O O m O m O In M O m M O O 't N � LO ti M N O m m �_ M t" i ti M co (fl O O M t°? (fl N O m mQf T O �i O N m O r� M _ LO M M Q1 M O V M ti ( M CD m M� N w CD M M O N Ln LO CD m N M co C M C In 00 tD V co co N LO O co N o m m r = co = c m O O co N «S - E E O. m O U N M M Ln N N O m N rl- ti O tD m O M O ti O M ti co m In ,�t O ti m N O tD O O N O ti O 't N LO M Ln m O M O V r� W m O O O V O M O M C 131 m mQf O Ln I' -Ln O V co V r� V M O M M O m O V M ti ( M M U)c m O N w N Ln M O N co (9 O CD N 0 m C V C In V O 00 co co V LO O co N o m m r = co = c m O co «S - E E O. O U N M m Q1 lS7 �2 N m M CO — M W O O OM co ' V O m M r- m M O O O to O (fl N D74 ti O m M W N (O O O O(D O (o co ti (fl m (D O (o m ti V m C; (fl ti w M O rl- O � M O p ti Ln N 0 0 0 0 I LO co r` O O ty _ ti O T M O M m O N m N m N LO m O m m O M (fl r` W m M m O m of ti N O r� m O m V O V co V ti r- N lO O m M CO (O 0 V N c0i N ( * CD co U)c O m Lr C co O m O m O N N O m C C C t0 m O U O Ln N Ln M O (D � I- O p O O m O O O m co co m ty m V O N N O (D O O N m p co {p O (D O (fl (fl O W O N O O m N N M tD V m O m� V N M ti (D O O O m M CO to N rl r (D O M U)c O co N m O m O V O lO N O m C C C t0 m O U M to o m m r = co = c m O M «S - E E O. O U N M co O1 _ L-6 O ti tD N 00 O tb Ln r to O r O M O N M Ln to O L!'7 CD M M N r I E ro Q n 2 U 7 C O C U md m m a U)c U c o � C C C d m U U o m m E = = c m O O «S - E E O. O U cm C_ d O Vl = C > c m E o c m 2 d m J Do t6 a? a? c oW X m > o > d dl c ,� rn Q7 Z7 i m 00 m c m (A c N c U N m Q c p m c a w T E m m 3 C 06 > o w N N t N U r H H O W 1� " '� •E I m c a� U Gci a m z3 ZD w N C E O O A U m N N m y c c y i w c n oc E o 5� N E Q ❑ D= M CL m in O Y m O OU O E E x to N O C J U a a U W U V W O m H U D 0 C C F N co N M LO N CO 't CO ti 00 N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O (D (D ti ti ti rl- W W m co co W M m m O O w O O O O ti O O O O O O O � O O OOf O O O O _ L-6 O ti tD N 00 O tb Ln r to O r O M O N M Ln to O L!'7 CD M M N r I ACTION NO. ITEM NO. L- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 26, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: Accounts Paid- March 2016 Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance APPROVED BY: Thomas C. Gates County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Direct Deposit Checks Total Payments to Vendors $ - $ - $ 6,435,142.80 Payroll 03/11/16 1,302,251.10 51,772.56 1,354,023.66 Payroll 03/25/16 1,204,654.50 84,530.45 1,289,184.95 Manual Checks - 705.91 705.91 Grand Total $ 9,079,057.32 A detailed listing of the payments to vendors is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER L-8 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER. MEETING DATE: April 26, 2016 AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of 31 -Mar -16 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: CASHINVESTMENT: SUNTRUST CON 1,381,418.78 1,381,418.78 CrZsPA=1N �il�►�� SCOTT STRINGFELLOW CONTRA 27,496.00 SCOTT STRINGFELLOW 57,009,365.34 WELLS FARGO 15,000,000.00 WELLS FARGO CONTRA (200.00) 72,036,661.34 LOCAL GOVT INVESTMENT POOL: GENERAL OPERATION 10,194,727.49 10,194,727.49 MONEY MARKET: BRANCH BANKING & TRUST 1,083,012.98 SCOTT STRINGFELLOW - JAIL 1,104,357.63 SCOTT STRINGFELLOW 1,272,441.37 UNION FIRST 3,077,928.20 VALLEY BANK/BNC 2,515,285.23 WELLS FARGO 2,128,168.81 11,181,194.22 TOTAL 94,794,001.83 04/26/2016 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. M.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: April 26, 2016 Work session to review with the Board of Supervisors the proposed fiscal year 2017-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and proposed fiscal year 2016-2017 Debt Service Fund Christopher Bever Director of Management and Budget APPROVED BY: Thomas C. Gates County Administrator ISSUE: Board of Supervisors' review of the County Administrator's proposed fiscal year 2017- 2026 Capital Improvement Program and fiscal year 2016-2017 Debt Service Fund. BACKGROUND: As part of the fiscal year 2016-2017 budget development process, staff has conducted a series of work sessions with the Board of Supervisors on a variety of budget topics. This work session is the third of three work sessions conducted subsequent to the County Administrator's Capital Improvement Program proposal to the Board of Supervisors on January 26, 2016, and Operating Budget proposal to the Board of Supervisors on March 8, 2016. DISCUSSION: This time has been scheduled to discuss the County Administrator's proposed fiscal year 2017-2026 Capital Improvement Program and proposed fiscal year 2016-2017 Debt Service Fund. The attached PowerPoint presentation will be shown. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Page 1 of 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors receive information in the work session presentation as relates to the proposed fiscal year 2017-2026 Capital Improvement Program and proposed fiscal year 2016-2017 Debt Service Fund. Page 2 of 2 0 O am p z .0 Lu LL Lu Cl) LuO> 0 � LU _ Fom Q Lu N N FEN; Q a Q 'O N Q Z A = V Q m°QL > > • O O O LL N N N O O O N N N LL LL LL - 1 1 1 > O (D N N N V I.L U. U. J � FE; d � 00 co � Na off N Z LU LLC LU W > �0 N a W N N X N O 0 a) cn E cn a) cn .cn -0 O m -0 �o 0 0 o c� CL m is L 0 U O D U co N O N L.L ti O N LL 4-1 r - c rd rd o rd 611 IQ (V Ln a) u — z Q � J C LA Ln CD 0 r {U CD V w CL La rd o rd 611 IQ LL o v o Q -0 C Ln CD rd CD L 0 o o 0 o 0 o Q O O c e 41 M O} V rdCO E G O G 4 E 0_ LLL O C r0 U C 4- 'AN 0rd U t NNQ u q1 O Id % ❑ J � I� 61 o W 6rl 611 IQ o v o Q v Ln CD CD 0 o o 0 o o Q O O e M n O O G 4 O 7 O N 'AN NNQ Ln 6 Oyy 6K 6KG Y'S Y'9 yr9 La �+ 'C wn O 3e 0 G CL c m -0 i+ C O C/�y OE 44. LQitl r C V � L � r a U r O N LL r --A sd S!5 N 0 ry1 S17 a--� i q o (.% _ �o 4- riy ' '14 V 0 a--� --i o [rj' S --I Q1 C) "..- +-4 LLn N+-4 ce,i--i bo i�y-••I YI C) �--� Q/ N ��y r-� 1-4 Jam' /� ' N b.0 QJ QJ QJ - 2a fll aha o V] r~i T+V SJ CJ r-� a� � •1-� Ql U'1 '�" 41 '-� '"C C) 4 ,' } x o y cU •+- 0 o p '+} y o O O _ S{l N L+7 +moi L+ ;yL4� b.O 'D �y r i L+7 Y N� 0 0114 o [+] cri '.SIJ' 0 04 V QJ i V y{, -0 -J V r14 -d r . 41 } q ^ryCD tJ rte' :4 04 J r-' �24 � vj QJ . i ifUl EnA'.Y •� ems• C�'%5 Q? o C54 � ami �'° J-� p } r'� Q1 � C/S � {1 ;L4 1-4 Da �j r' S Ql i --I U] 4 v •'�-� S '' Sf] S 7 of �U € o P- x Q ; 0 0 ;-4a bo 7' a J 4, 04 -J 0 rd 04 ' �rN bia UO �!] , 4 p +j o7 r sd " sd a � = rd o 01 bio o �wr 0 oma; ;L4Uv_ o H v o 5L4 5n4 }i UY ~ %a } o LL 4 { ' J m iyCS N N 14 --1 0 r 0 }I' V CL}� �' wry C) i14 /D� /--yl ' 4 Ql `la Da } ti rn y i! [v ;L4Z o e }' Q1 w i-4 i•,I i-4 ri--+ tt Qa bA v l� sd o w •+-i {� Sl+ Cl �� ' o o I..1 Cd � 0 0 -Si �! bo � y fit, o r i' O s� , fit, U , a' er 4 v = ryy fix, F+ [!14 v Q H E! r:14 J � FE; d 00 W CN N 0 Z LU >. LU > LL 50 I LU 0 r*.. > Z o 0 O Naz 000""*%% U 00 i N T 0 �--+ 70 70 N N O N LL �--' +-+ U) 70(� _0 U) ~ N m U) i 0 C T u) E U LL O -0 E_0 }, p N p E Q �U?a) E� n U o }, N O Z3U }, U) (a O O > U) LL L 7 LL UQ U >, 70}' U O O L U) Cn 1 L Oto O U -o N E to (a 4-, 4-0Q i a- N U) p L.L N C: to U v o- U) a) U - 0 o��U o�� o� ~U �o �� � -o U) pn n UU > E U� UW CDU mU U) U) _0 o _0 m m 4-0 Q U Z3 M LL cn U) � D U p p O }' O .0 U U N • p p }, L U) m 000""*%% U �0 w N O N U- I ti r 0 N LL G1 = i O O — c •E co LO 069 LL d V _ O O Oco. r c•E CD N ,= N LCL = 69 0 U- cn c 0 E 0 E 70 U O OO o C U O U c 040 EZ a� U L U) U) O LO o cu (ci 0 ' () EF? C7 O N U) U) 70 cB C J 00) m o N O 0 N r N Q' cn ca .0 Mn -Co 0 � U U cn N L U) 70 LL >, O o O CO U O z U L U) O 00 ?UC14LO U) O O -r- L) U U) 70 N U U) 0 ri)0�0 6 L O U CL O z N U L O COm 0 O O T- ri1 w N O N ti r N U.0 O t V i7 W Al rn o N O rn o 00 0 Lo N f` m U N C: 0 m 0) N 0) 0 L 0) 6OF i7 W 1■ 0 r LO c6 U 0 0 m co ti 0 M ti CD T- 6OF 0 0 LO LO CD M a') T- oo o o 0 M 00 • Nt 00 N M d) Co to NN H} O cw (D Ef} N • m 0 }' U m H i7 W 1■ 0 r LO c6 U 0 0 m co ti 0 M ti CD T- 6OF Lii � � N O � N r � U- N O N U— O N O N L}L r O O 6F} U- M OM N ON Ef? Ef? Ef? Ef? (suoill!w ui) fuipun=l LO O V- V- 6? K? 0 r N N o to N � U`` � Em U- 00 L 0 LMCL 0 E n O A --j L 0. E > O r 0 O N m r E N Ncn � _ > LL M cn Ef? Ef? Ef? Lii � � N O � N r � U- N O N U— O N O N L}L r O O 6F} U- M OM N ON Ef? Ef? Ef? Ef? (suoill!w ui) fuipun=l LO O V- V- 6? K? 0 r N N o to N � � U- Lii � � N O � N r � U- N O N U— O N O N L}L r O O 6F} U- M OM N ON Ef? Ef? Ef? Ef? (suoill!w ui) fuipun=l LO O V- V- 6? K? � � 11 El N o to } 6F} � � � 11 El 000""*%% 00U O N 1i cn 70 coz �o C: 0 co 0 - co U- 2 0) U) U co IT a E U) a U)^ Q N _ N U- -U) N U U) N � O 0 0 40 N Q 'o i N O cn Cfl O N 40 m CD co co N O N O N 60- 60- 60- 60- 60- 60- 60- e --N 00 d o a) N o OO ^� � —o E 0)N (D N LL _0N 4-0 N U N LO (a _N C: }'N LCL m E N N Uu- N � U) N LL O U) CO � U� m U U) N W (D o� cn o- o- �. 0 - co U- 2 0) U) U co IT a E U) a U)^ Q N _ N U- -U) N U U) N � O 0 0 40 N Q 'o i N O cn Cfl O N 40 J � FE; N CN N Z = >= LU LL r. 2 1 LU Fm U rpW Na0 U �O ^L U_ w O cnN ■= U m a) m ■_ E V CM 'o CM LmO Ocn U MMM a)L4E: -" cm C: to O l - C O � U� N M a) I cn m Q Q Q CD N m N O U 4L w CIO 13 X E E O 0 H• El - co Z> U Q) V CL U LL CL Q) �M ._ �Q�� v 13 X E E O 0 H• El - co Z> U Q) V CL U LL CL Q) E c� F-- 0 O N v N 0 O U - E CD �o. 000 _LO N v T- CL c` tot L W .O L a E F -- 0 V 0 O r N •E N O N �O co L CL U (1) U i CO O a) r (n cli C9 NEf3 ';T L 00601 C L) 0 \ C U pp 1 L�� s= a)�'o N 2 cu rl- O (n N U � LO a k. U z c C 0 r S u a 0 vi L LL Z i c LL u c Q L a u e k. a� aa) L 0,0 carno o E ' 5 , U0Uj UC/) N L d o ooh o C L) C IrmC L O Ll Z Q Z 00601 C L) 0 \ C U pp 1 L�� s= a)�'o N 2 cu rl- O (n N U � LO a k. U z c C 0 r S u a 0 vi L LL Z i c LL u c Q L a u e lus k. U aa) L 0,0 s t/ E ' 5 , a UC/) N L 0 C C IrmC L Ll Z Q Z c Li C. n lus M O c0 ; M O • ' o0 O o U') o w .. I-- O co M w 6 0 � Eft 09- Eft CD o CD 40 0 U .-. U) m 0 _ E +-0 0) N 0) O E cn cn cn U c� CIO i i CIO A-0 • b9 69 U . O pop n (D r- C) C) LO m C) IT LO w CD w LO cfl co c� 0 0 0m o o co o 0o E09- 09- 09- 09- 09- 09-40 co m (D CD O N i i N i i i i i NO CD M CD CDC: �+ CD CD C6O C: � ^ E c: U 0 >-I °' p U U) LL Co 4-0 J o Q4-0 > 0 — 70 C C/) o �CIO o 0-� � o cD � Q o im > o o lo� � w o rY 0 >' T Z) Cn (� 0 E o o c 0)�_ U o 0 o m > m N U J O U � � 7 x _ M p 0 N O U) o cn W U) U) U -t_rZU o U D cq ED 0 0 0 2 2 ri ri U H • • O IT O N O N O m } 09- 09- 09- 0!:)- 0!:)- 0!:)- 0!:)- 40 rCD O , O N , 00 N U') U')N O O w O O O O O O O O r Ef- I Ef- Ef- Ef- Ef- Ef- Ef- Ef- Eft E � O J O_ N }' }' U +Z3 cn )U O I O � O -t N U) U) � U) Q a- _N W m m N 4- O m m > O N (( U cn U) (n (n (n �o +� W W W 70 . E o � o 0 0�(D m U U Z Z Z E o 4 J 2 � 00 H • • cn .. cN ,IT O Cd N O O O M O r r— co O O r E 0 E a� U 0 U 0> 0 L U }' J0 m— 0 m ca � a - U) U) -0 U) 0 -t E °' o - o ca M o p 2 U w cn U CD Q= U C: • co Kcn i c0 • O • 69' 64 � N C4 N ff� ff� Eft O O U') U 00 N O O O O O O O O o - o U 0 a� a 0 }' U IL 70 U) U U) a - H -I.-a C: -0 U G G G �O • N i C: o- O L Q �.aI 0 0 U L � O -I.-a C: -0 G G G G G • N i C: o- O L Q �.aI cn FO U CL � O Un 0 0 0 0 0 V 0 G G G G G G G • N C'7 m N O CO T N � � � � 09� 09� 0 0 0 � 0 � �= m -0 U) cn 0 m '� ° 0- L- U U m LO J � M 1 O0 L m to U) = o 70 M •� •cn N p •� O M:N Z Z m LL m . I L ti L ti N LO O ti a� I-- IT 00 O 00 N O O .� C'7 C'7 CY) 1` N C'7 1` N (D IT M N I-- C'7 M 60- 60- 60- 091 Eft Eft Eft Eft C (D E (D (6 Q U N N � U O > L L N > CO O O O 1-1 LL i -C 0 70U O u O U) L U)aw mU X U 70(a (D ui � OLL N _0 � N Q s= 0) 0 — cn LO O 0)O N U) O CU OU 0 ( U N i O m _0 U) T U s= U) _ V LL En a) _ -..0 00 O cn N _ N �, E U i I Cfl cn LL • s= 06 c p U Q o C U) • CD N OQ 00 }, C M (DEi M O N _0 Q N Q Q LO CD '+-+ _N U N w x N ami m O m LL U LL LL > �70 W O o 7 .-. 70 70 CV 7 i i Z3 m o Q� U N N c> c c 'i O ca ca O �, Z LLQ Z3 � LL LL O.� H 2}, senUGAGN saanlipuedx3 Cl) Z U Oa Hg G Fm Q W m� N 0 O � N m LCL � Z ti 0 Fm - CN LU LLC0 U s 4 O O U �+ ate-+cn ca 0 �-+ U U E > a) CO U ca cn U m }+ V CL O C CIO 0� '�•- ass =� � +� a� ca ca � � � •o � C CL M C o __� •- CL ,E .- o LL Cl) CLCLLL mCL Q � �o ao 00 w0 U Q O O O O O O O O O O w 0 O • 6F} 6F} 6F} N cn O }' U a) a) 'o U n � m � U 00 .L C m U U U) M J m L a cn m L a) U U) M 7C3 O J m cn O U) J � LLJ � N +� U Z > 0 FM m LU 0 (1) o m .O iAW AW L as cn � O o E �4-0 ^L — O m N co _ C N (1) m .O iAW L � cn 0 co o E — O m co _ C .— L m O c� L O TOM m (D � cn 0 co o CL co Q m o co ~ co co co o rn co co O o N 09� ti c C 0 O w O M � O T o 2 N _ R (1) :3 L 70 M a) CDL a) a) m �U x cn CDL T o w � U o cn m< L �m E M 0- � x • N 0 N N 0 0 IR r O co V.: O r 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOC O LOC O LO O LO O M M N N O O amen passessy algexel;o % e se }qaa N O N LO N O N N O N co N O N N O N C: O N � W cu a) C) U) N E O N O N 0 N M O N ti 0 N — Q� i Ilz �U � U � O CL �O y►,CL O (B N SZ i CL SZ m — �a Q)M co (ya� C0 co O co U CL S, co ME 0 co m LA 0 Ln 0 O O ti O CD N L � I..L Q x to LLI 0 co m LA 0 Ln 0 O O ti N 0 N LO N O N N O N co N O N N U- 0 N O N rn O N 00 0 N ti 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O 00 (D N O saan}ipuedx3 }uauauaanoE) JeaauaE) 10 % e se aainaaS }qaa O CD N O M to to 0 Cfl N 0 N LO N O N N O N co N O N N U- 0 N O N rn O N 00 0 N ti 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O 00 (D N O saan}ipuedx3 }uauauaanoE) JeaauaE) 10 % e se aainaaS }qaa .Q U L a W) W) le r tot r O (D vmr tot C) LO o LO o LO � 6 � ($) e}ideo aad jgaa N O N 0 L Q N 0 O C) UN co N O N N N J O O N C: Rf LUcu _ U a� O U -� L Q O O N rn C) N -I� 0 co r iv O C) i N U) r. .0 V L L m *7 E O 0 0 > cn 0 C: Q � 0.0 Uv 0 cn � o o 0 a. 0 U) r. .0 V L L m *7 E O 0 LE I 0 > cn 0 C: Q � 0.0 Uv 0 cn � o o � �0 LE I V O J � U0 -0 o ry 0 0 V O J O � co 0 � m aA.—ON v, N = i Nco o 0 p Q= C), CL o �W x oa) cL = Q '2E o Cu 0! � co > 00 Q V� T" o 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o) co p O O O O O O O O O O O I� O LO 'IT C7 N O -0 o p O ami W)ami ^�` O m CSF N m W CV � � L '> � °' U) N N 0 o 0 EW N r co� co N UU co p W) a CL � Uco x x � U M ai p O " CL 0 Q N d r c � ' a � o � Q Ef? Q ++ CO C = C C = 0 Co 0 o Cq 0 o O Q N U 40 aU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- � � � � � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � O � O � O ti C'ti C'ti N ti N ti N m N N O O 'RT 'RT C7 C7 N N — — 61), 61), � EF? EF? EF? EF? EF? EF1 to to i N 00 U- 0) cu N N z O U- 0) cu O a� 0) D X LU O N LL E OO O cB O 0 6 co U N OO O O O �U O N O O � O N O LL U (D c� (b O U O ,co O N co co cB w o Cl) w O O 0 0 �co cB _N -O N N LL O O N il N - - LL LO N .. LL N •" LL �r � M N Q (� •" LL N CY) O LL O N } LL LU I '. cu N >- CD N o a L LL LL LL U) LL LU LL■ ti LL - C IE! x O LLI O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 CO I- N O 00 CO I- N Ef} N d9 r r r r r ff)- ff} ff} 64 d9 d9 d9 d9 d9 (suoillp $) }qaa buipue}s}np N 00 U- 0) cu N N z O U- 0) cu O a� 0) D X LU O N LL E OO O cB O 0 6 co U N OO O O O �U O N O O � O N O LL U (D c� (b O U O ,co O N co co cB w o Cl) w O O 0 0 �co cB _N -O N N LL O O N il P***ft r O N LL � N CO CO 07 � O 07 07 09- 07 CO m qq- qqt 09-� O N CO I�- CO qr-- M C114 Cfl a) (D N CD N 649. ..00 r CO qqt O M d7 Ln Ln N Ln N qr-- O O M M 00 't a) 649. • CO I� � � M O m CSO M O N qq- qq- 00 O CO qr-- O CO LO CO CO CO O � 09- fig} fig} N 649. 06 O V Cl) _ 00 0 0 • O O D U 0 0 U 0 cn cn H Cl) P***ft r O N LL N 00 O am Cfl r 00 00 m r r M O coco O T" 00 Re i U- = E O � �o � o o y o • O co 0) I oo-. Cq M ti (D {f} to 00 ti � 00 a) N T--- T- O CD T- � N O vc)- �} N 649. 00 00 (D I IM M 613- 613- M r 00 N N o0 O O (D 00 a) 649. • N M N Ln M T- O I�- (D lq- a) M T--- lq- 00 M O Ln ti V-- O Ln O 00 (D T- N O (D 0) 613- � I T- 09 - Hc} Hc} NN 649. O U O � � U N 06 C:U • O E U N = U o t� L 0 (,.D- U) O V • C a) o a)5 a) o O U � O c6 cn E E E E cn LL v O CD 42 4a-)0 w � H ch C� C� N 00 O am Cfl r 00 00 m r r M O coco O T" 00 Re i U- = E O � �o � o o y o • O co O LU cu N U cn LL 's cu En a� Z E O LL El t OO w O N LL r 0 co OO O � O U � co N U � U � c� (DU mo O N O O N w LL :3 N U4- � N O co 0 ai o w z N co co � O O N Uw � O N � Cl) N �. co � cB O cB N cB U LL N O cB N a i �a N - LL LO N - LL N U_ co N - L}L = 0 .. N N N N Q Q N - N 0) LL L}L _ 1 _ to .. 0 O N � a N '- _- LL r— M •• VI •X (/% W .. 00 _- LL ■U • ti - LL ■ Q w N O O LO 613- O 613- � � (suoiII!W $) aainaaS }qaa O LU cu N U cn LL 's cu En a� Z E O LL El t OO w O N LL r 0 co OO O � O U � co N U � U � c� (DU mo O N O O N w LL :3 N U4- � N O co 0 ai o w z N co co � O O N Uw � O N � Cl) N �. co � cB O cB N cB U LL N O cB N a i U) am LU FMU) FM X LU Z a) a) C:cnCU O -t Q O N L CL EL 0 E O a)N � � (a LL � a) C:cnCU O -t Q O O CL EL n i _D r W N CD • N N W N N M M M M CD W r W N U1 N N N N M co Q N Q Q Q Q a a a a Baa a a a a E L E L LU LM LM • O 0O _ % �= = O H O (n OC t mw 004 0 O 44 a O a > E vti C.1 O O •_ O " 0. a 4 > O v O O .a — cn O V = L L ti a� o -6don as as '� E. E._CD CD O � t as 0 0 O as ca N N 15F -1 V O V 0 cn O w o C, U. U. AN-NNO a) 0) u u u u u u u . to to (6 .� .� L^` W Q _ O _ C4 r N 0 N Q ' LLCL � a) C/) A. -O � OCL O a) 0. Z u u u u u u u . to to .� .� _ _ _ C4 C4 N Q ' o -• AMEN • No o Tom o ' o �1 • _ o SII �' EMEME AMEN • 'LL . o • tl • r • o • o ' " To -C o • r TomAMEN I LL • Cq EMEME• .L EMEME o . .>- Cl. • o 0 0 0 0 . • No.. • o , . • • • , ,. u , . M NoEtl o ' . .� E o o o 13 _ Cq• MENEM Tom To - No No W . SII . SII SII 0 Cl) FM z LU 5050O (0) Cl) z 0 FMCl)LU C� O P) m z > V u JokO U N O LU 1 m z O Q AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 2016 RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each member's knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies; and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. P.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: April 26, 2016 The petition of David B. McClure, Apex Towers, LLC to obtain a Special Use Permit for a broadcasting tower (cell tower) approximately 154 feet in height in a 1-2, High Intensity Industrial, District on approximately 4.58 acres, located at 5119 Hollins Road, Hollins Magisterial District Philip Thompson Deputy Director of Community Development Thomas C. Gates County Administrator Agenda item for public hearing and second reading of ordinances on an application to obtain a special use permit. BACKGROUND: There is no background associated with this agenda item. DISCUSSION: Rebecca James presented the staff report. David McClure, President of Apex Towers, LLC, presented a brief overview of the proposed use. Mr. McClure also spoke to the process and the completed review of the application, including reports, with various Federal agencies, including: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) report, the Section 106 report and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Air Space Study. McClure also explained in detail alternative sites that were considered for co -location purposes and the need for this tower in conjunction of the Old Mountain Road tower (approved March 22, 2016). George Condyles, Roanoke County's consultant for wireless communications, spoke in greater detail about the federal review process and provided a background on the type Page 1 of 2 of service the proposed tower will provide. Mr. Condyles also summarized his technical report, which is part of the application packet. He did recommend approval of the petition. The Commissioners confirmed the contract with Verizon Wireless to co -locate on this tower, if approved. In addition, there was discussion regarding the need for an additional tower, the type of service proposed, the specific location of the tower on the property and the existing telecommunications carrier network in the Hollins area. There was also discussion concerning the staff suggested conditions and the need for both if the proposal were to change or if there was a change in Virginia State Code, specifically to the height of the tower. One citizen spoke against this petition. The main concern was the potential health effects of the microwaves from the broadcasting tower. Commission Action: Mr. Butzer made a motion to recommend approval of the special use permit petition with the following conditions: 1. Total height of the tower shall not exceed 154 feet. 2. Lighting on the broadcasting tower shall not be permitted, unless required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The motion passed 5-0. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the second reading of the ordinance to allow a special use permit for a broadcasting tower. Page 2 of 2 STAFF REPORT Petitioner: Apex Towers, LLC — David B. McClure, President Request: To obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a Broadcast Tower Location: 5119 Hollins Road Magisterial District: Hollins Proffered/Suggested Conditions: 1. Total height of the broadcast tower shall not exceed 154 feet. 2. Lighting on the broadcast tower shall not be permitted, unless required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Apex Towers, LLC, is requesting a special use permit to construct a 150 -foot high monopole broadcasting tower, with a four -foot high lighting rod. The proposed tower is to be constructed within a 50' by 50' fenced compound area at 5119 Hollins Road. The parcel is zoned 1-2, High Intensity Industrial, district and is 4.58 acres in size. The site is designated Principal Industrial by the 2005 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed project does conform to the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and Principal Industrial guidelines. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS A Broadcast Tower is defined as any structure that is designed and constructed primarily for the purpose of supporting one (1) or more antennas. The term includes but need not be limited to radio and television transmission towers, microwave towers, common -carrier towers, and cellular telephone and wireless communication towers. Broadcasting tower types include, but are not limited to monopoles, lattice towers, wooden poles, and guyed towers. Excluded from this definition are amateur radio towers, which are described separately. A Broadcast Tower is permitted in the 1-2, High Intensity Commercial zoning district with a special use permit. Section 30-87-2 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance provides the use and design standards for a Broadcast Tower. A copy of this section is attached. Roanoke County building permit reviews will be required. Apex Towers, LLC has completed the review required by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC), including the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) report, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements. All conclusions and copies of required reports are submitted as an attachment. To summarize, there are no adverse environmental effects to the construction of this proposal. The FAA determined that the proposed tower would not be a hazard to air navigation. Finally, no adverse effects on historic properties were found in the preservation area. In addition, Apex Towers, LLC has also included a site license agreement between Apex Tower, LLC and Cellco Partnership (d.b.a. Verizon Wireless). ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background — The applicant reports that no available structures exist within a one mile radius that meet Verizon Wireless, and other wireless telecommunication carriers, coverage objectives and can also structurally handle the proposed equipment. In addition, the applicant has indicated this site was designed by Apex Towers, LLC to assist Verizon Wireless and other wireless telecommunication carriers to provide additional coverage along Hollins Road and in -building coverage where it is very weak or non-existent. This tower site has specifically been designed to hand-off from the existing Plantation tower site to the southwest and carry wireless traffic to the northeast and handoff to the Cloverdale (7014 Old Mountain Road) tower site (approved by the Board of Supervisors on March 22, 2016) to the northeast. In addition, Apex Tower, LLC has submitted propagation maps showing the need for both this tower and the Cloverdale tower site. Topography/Vegetation — The proposed site is fairly flat. Within the proposed location of the leased 2,500 square foot area, there are a variety of evergreen trees. In addition, the proposed site is behind the existing building where mature trees will surround and screen the compound on the west and south sides, the Norfolk and Southern railroad tracks on the east side and the existing building on the north side. Very little land disturbance will be required. The proposed access road will run parallel with the railroad tracks which will not visible from almost all adjacent properties. Surrounding Neighborhood — LBM Office Solutions currently operates at 5119 Hollins Road. LBM Office Solutions is a general office use type. Located across Hollins Road are C-1, Low Intensity Commercial, district, and 1-1 C, Low Intensity Industrial, district with conditions, zoned parcels. The Roanoke County Fleet Service Center is located across Carlos Drive, to the north. Located to the immediate east of the proposed location is the Norfolk and Southern Railroad. Across the railroad tracks to the east is a vacant R-1, Low Density Residential, district zoned parcel. To the south is an adjacent 1-2, High Intensity Industrial, district zoned parcel. The closest single-family residence is approximately 750 feet from the proposed broadcasting tower. 3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture — The submitted building plans indicate a 154 -foot high new monopole broadcasting tower within a 50' by 50' gated, six-foot chain linked fence, compound. The total land area that Apex Towers, LLC is proposing to lease is 2,500 square feet. Within the fenced compound, the proposed tower, required ground level equipment, and future lease areas for future wireless communications carriers are proposed. Verizon Wireless antennas are proposed at the 147 -foot height location. Co -location options will be made available. The facility will be accessed by a new driveway from Carlos Drive. A new 20 -foot wide ingress/egress easement and utility right-of-way is also proposed. The proposed tower will be 83.4 feet from the existing building, 75.9 feet from the Railroad and over 200 feet from all other property lines. Existing, mature trees will serve as existing screening for the proposed facility on the south, east and west sides. The existing building will screen the proposed site to the north side. Very few trees will be removed for the construction of the facility and broadcast tower. The proposed project is required to meet all federal, state and local building codes and regulations. Complete building plans have been submitted with this application. Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc. — Technical Review — George Condyles, Roanoke County's wireless communications consultant with Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc., has reviewed the submitted request 2 and has submitted a technical report, which is attached. Mr. Condyles recommends that the application be approved. Fire & Rescue/Utilities/Office of Building Safety — The Roanoke County Building Commissioner requires building permits and inspections for any property structures, including the service equipment, per the 2012 Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. The Roanoke County Fire Marshall's Office does not object to the submitted application. Community Meeting —A community meeting was held at the Roanoke County Fleet Services Center on March 7, 2016 between 5:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. Over 250 notices were mailed to property owners in close proximity to the proposed site. Seven citizens attended the meeting. David McClure, President of Apex Towers, LLC, was also in attendance. The main concerns expressed during the community meeting were visibility of the tower, coverage questions, the service provider and specific concerns over the location on the proposed site. A balloon test was also done on March 7, 2016 to illustrate the height of the proposed tower and to show the visibility from adjacent properties. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH THE ROANOKE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The 2005 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan designates the area as Principal Industrial, a future land use area where a variety of industry types are encouraged to locate. Principal Industrial areas are existing and planned regional employment centers and are distributed throughout Roanoke County, convenient to major residential areas and suitable highway access. The proposed broadcast tower conforms to the Principal Industrial guidelines. 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS Apex Towers, LLC, is requesting a special use permit to construct a 150 -foot high monopole broadcasting tower, with an four -foot high lighting rod. The proposed tower is to be constructed within a 50' by 50' fenced compound area at 5119 Hollins Road. The parcel is zoned 1-2, High Intensity Industrial, district and is 4.58 acres in size. The proposed project is in conformance with the goals and objectives of the Principal Industrial Future Land Use Designation. Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc. has provided a technical review of the proposed request and has recommended the application be approved on technical merit. Additionally, staff suggests the following condition, if the Planning Commission recommends approval of the special use permit request, which would mitigate the impact of the proposed tower: 1. Total height of the broadcast tower shall not exceed 154 feet. 2. Lighting on the broadcast tower shall not be permitted, unless required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). CASE NUMBER: 2-412016 PREPARED BY: Rebecca James HEARING DATES: PC: 4/5/2016 BOS: 4/26/2016 ATTACHMENTS: Application Aerial Map Zoning Map Future Land Use Map Section 30-87-2 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Technical Review, submitted by Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc., dated February 26, 2016. M County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (5401) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 ALL APPLICANT'S ,0 For Staff Use Only Date ceived: Received by: iI to lk: Application fee: PCfBZj, date: Placards issued: DOS date: Case Number D — LqA , (P,1 i n Check type of application filed (check all that apply) ❑ Rezoning Kspecial Use ❑ Variance 0 Waiver ❑ Administrative Appeal ❑ Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address w/zip g �.t�tesr��.;- Phone: 30-- - ZSR- XNpV.� . ►tit#� J Work: ,¢y V u_e 5=-!jAqd-k /lines Cell #: � - &erb --7 '30'1' r 14,V TSP,01 Fax No.: ZSZ / 12 S2 - Owner's name/address w/zip Phone #: bur"— d1. Ayrl a 171--wte Work: Y�Y 11,aMwk- 6W� Fax No. #: Ae!-1u,4 3zT 38 Property Location Magisterial District: , Community Planning area: Tax Map No.: pig. ag -at - 07, 00 - 00027 Existing Zoning: r 7— Size of pareel(s): Acres: $ 7r $ Existing Land Use: REZONING, SPECW USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (75.2-2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (R1SIWICP) Proposed Zoning: Ao 61motq Proposed Land Use: a/, "*-s '�� r �� 1�; ,7a4/Q--,f— Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes ;�- No C7 IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes. No ❑ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes ❑ No ❑ VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (VIW/AA) Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to 12 A Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE A ED IF ANY ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. RISAVICP v/AA R/srwiCP vrAA Pisrw/CP v� 2 8 70,16 Consultation 8 1/2'" x 11"concept plan � licationl�� Application Metes and bounds description ers, if applicable Justification Water7dW plica ` n ing property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner o�#, pe�ty o t or contract purchaser an cting with the knc consent f the owner. w �i, b' 2 and JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PTRMtT'WAIVER OR CONJ[P. PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW REQUESTS Applicant AW 7�tks,, The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. AU" --O— /P-�- a-& d4 -e -y' Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. ,/1"/fit Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/rccreation and fire and rescue. phi,�-.acs G�••/t(0 3 Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. The proposed Hollins Road tower site has been strategically designed not only as to the geographical position but the height as well to allow multiple carriers to cover a specific area of Hollins Road (Route 501) and the population residing and conducting business, and to provide optimum in -building penetration as reflected on the attached propagation maps. The addition of the Hollins Road tower site will provide for consistent and ubiquitous coverage from the Verizon tower site to the north (Cloverdale) and the Verizon tower site to the south (Plantation Road). Without the Hollins Road tower site the in - building wireless coverage will remain weak and outdoor coverage inconsistent. The wireless carriers cannot successfully compete with wireline internet and security system providers if coverage is not improved. Once this tower is constructed there is no reason why another broadcast tower would be needed in this area for many years to come, thus, reducing the number of broadcast towers in the county. Please explain how this project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan This tower and the facilities have been positioned on the property to have the least visual impact as possible. The facilities are located behind the existing building with the front view blocked by the building and mature foliage and trees surrounding the other three sides. We purposely kept the compound design to a minimum (2500 sq. ft. versus the normal compound size of 10,000 sq. ft.) and the area will be protected by a 6 ft. chain link fence with a locked gate. We will remove only the trees and foliage necessary to construct the compound area. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. We do not believe there will be an adverse impact on the property itself or to the adjoining properties. The leased property is currently being used as industrial space which is consist with a broadcast tower. The property to the north is the Roanoke County Fleet Maintenance facility which is used to maintain the County's vehicles. It our understanding a tower was approved on the maintenance facility property several years ago for emergency and county service purposes but it was never built. We met with the county two years ago to discuss the possibility of reviving that project and the negotiations stalled. The property to the immediate east of the proposed location is the Norfolk Southern Corporation railroad property. The property to the south and west of the leased property across Hollins Road (Route 501) is also industrial property. This tower site should have minimal to no adverse impact on public services as we plan to bring electric and telco services underground in PVC conduit. There should be adequate ingress and egress in the event fire or rescue services are required. CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions ate proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: AL APPLICANTS a. Applicant name and name of development 7 b. Date, scale and north arrow V/ c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties g. All property lines and easements h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZONING and SPECLIL USE PERMITAPPLICANTS k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals V Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections r o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants �l k P. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they arc addressed , �Lk q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule Lre complete. //',4� Date 6 Apex Towers January 18, 2016 County of Roanoke Department of Community Development ---- Planning Commission 5204 Bernard Drive, SW P© Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 office: 125 Whitestick Road,Beckley, WV 25801 Phone: 304-256-6426 Web: www.apex-towers.cam Re: Collocation Confirmation ---Proposed Hollins Road Tower To Whom It May Concern: This letter confirms that the tower for which Apex Towers, LLC is requesting approval on Hollins Road, Roanoke, VA (State Route 601) will be designed and built for the collocation of at least three carriers. It is the policy of Apex Towers, LLC to allow co -location on a tower where it is structurally and economically feasible. There shall be no unreasonable act or omission that would have the effect of excluding, obstructing or delaying joint use of any tower where fair and market reasonable compensation is offered for such use. Please contact me with any questions at (304) 256-6426. B. McClure President Office: 125 Whitestick Road,Beckley, WV 25801 j{ ` 7� r Phone: 304-256-6426 Ap eX Tb !/ e 1 S J Web: www.apex-towers.com January 20, 2016 Ms. Rebecca James Community Zoning Officer County of Roanoke Department of Community Development — Planning Division 5204 Bernard Drive PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 RE: Hollins Road --Proposed Tower Site Dear Ms. James: I appreciate you meeting with me last week to discuss the application requirements of the County of Roanoke for a telecommunication tower. I am making application on behalf of Apex Towers, LLC to construct a 154' self-supporting wireless communication tower on the property owned by William H. Mistele (Trustee) located at 5119 Hollins Road, Roanoke, VA 24018. This property is located in the tax district of Hollins on Parcel ID: 039.09-01-07.00-0000 in Roanoke County, and ownership is reported on a Deed of Correction dated March 30, 2006, recorded on March 30, 2006 in Instrument No. 200604785. This property is zoned I-2 High Density Industrial District which allows a Broadcasting Tower only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. This site (referred to as "Hollins Road") was designed by Apex Towers, LLC to assist Verizon Wireless and other wireless telecommunication carriers to provide additional coverage along State Route 601 and in -building coverage where it is very weak or non-existent. This tower site has specifically been designed to hand-off from the existing Plantation tower site to the southwest and carry wireless traffic to the northeast and handoff to the proposed Cloverdale tower site to northeast. Both sites (Hollins Road and Cloverdale) will allow Verizon to provide local citizens with high-speed wireless broadband internet service, giving local customers another choice for internet service. In accordance with the County of Roanoke Application Requirements for a Special Use Permit, the following information and documents are included with this package: 1. Completed Application, signed by Apex Towers, the owner's agent. 2. Apex Towers' Proposal for a Telecommunications Tower 3. A check made payable to the County of Roanoke County Dept. of Community Development in the amount of $3,240.00, $40.00 representing the application fee and $3,200.00 representing the cost of the review services of Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc. 4. A redacted site license agreement between Apex Towers, LLC and Cellco Partnership (d.b.a. Verizon Wireless). Attached to this agreement as an exhibit is a redacted option and lease agreement between William H. Mistele (Trustee) and Apex Towers, LLC. 5. Summary of Existing Broadband Tower or Other Sites Considered and Rejected 6. Tax Map of the property 7. 2C letter with topography indicating proposed site location 8. Complete set of stamped construction drawings 9. List of Adjoining Property Owners 10. Confirmation of tower design for collocation 11. Monopole Design Information 12. Google Topographical Map of the Proposed Tower Site 13. Four Photo Simulations 14. Four Propagation Maps 15. Title Report 16. FAA Determination Letter 17. FCC Antenna Structure Registration 18. FCC/NEPA Environmental Compliance Checklist 19. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Report As indicated in the enclosed documents, we have studied the surrounding area within a one mile radius of the proposed site and there are no existing buildings, towers or other permanent structures that meet Verzon's coverage objectives and structurally handle the proposed equipment. We believe the construction of this 154' wireless communication facility is the best solution for Verizon and other wireless carriers (including cellular and personal communication services). Accordingly, we request that this application be presented and approved by the Roanoke County Planning Commission. Thank you for your consideration of this application and I look forward to presenting this application to the Planning Commission. In the meantime, if you require any additional information or have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Re ectfull , avid B. McClure President Enclosures Apex Towers' Proposal for a Telecommunications Tower Proposal Apex Towers, LLC (Apex) is proposing a 154 foot (above ground including lightning rod) monopole tower on 4.58 acres of property owned by Mistele Declaration of Trust, William H. Mistele, Trustee located at 5119 Hollins Road in the northeastern portion of Roanoke County. Verizon has agreed to be the anchor tenant on this tower site. There is a need for additional coverage in this area to provide improved high-speed, high-quality wireless internet and communication services to Verizon's customers while they travel along State Route 601 and rural streets, in their homes and businesses in the designed coverage areas. This tower location has been designed to achieve the following objectives: • Improve the existing wireless network by supporting the latest wireless technologies and provide coverage to the following: Those living in nearby residential neighborhoods; Those travelling on Hollins Road and other connecting roads and streets in the designed area Future businesses and residents that may locate in the designed area • Provide hand-offs and complete the coverage of the following nearby Verizon towers (moving from the north to the south): Tinker Mountain --- Botetourt County - 1896 Tinker Top Road Proposed Cloverdale — County of Roanoke — 7014 Old Mountain Road Proposed Hollins Road -- County of Roanoke — 5119 Hollins Road Plantation Road — City of Roanoke - 320 Hershberger Road NW • Provide collocation opportunities for other wireless carriers to expand their networks. As indicated in a separate letter to the Planning Commission, Apex will build the Hollins Road tower site to accommodate no less than carriers. Compatibility with Comprehensive Plan The Roanoke County Land Use Plan designates the subject property as Principle Industrial. The Comprehensive Plan defines Principle Industrial as "areas where high technology industries and research and development firms are present or may develop ". The proposed tower will facilitate existing industries and promote new industries by providing high-speed, high-quality wireless service in the area, which is a necessity for "high technology industries". Chapter 3: Land Use Issues, Design Guidelines, Principle Industrial, Guideline #11, encourages "the siting of communication antennae and dishes on existing or new structures ". Carriers prefer to collocate on existing structures; however, there are no existing towers or structures within the search area that are a sufficient height or structural integrity to meet the coverage objective. Therefore, Apex is proposing a new tower on a parcel designated as Principle Industrial, which is consistent with Guideline #11. Chapter 3: Land Use Issues, Citizen Participation, Implementation Strategies #8, states that "Roanoke County should provide its citizens the opportunity to interface with each other and the capability to access all community services through the latest communications technologies ". The proposed tower will provide residents, businesses and travelers in the area access to the latest wireless technologies, which is consistent with this strategy. Without telecommunication and other comparable structures (commercial buildings, etc.), wireless carriers such as Verizon cannot provide high-quality wireless service. Zoning Ordinance requirements The subject property is zoned I-2, High Intensity Industrial District. In accordance with Article 3, Section 30-62-2(B)(4), Miscellaneous Uses, of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, broadcasting towers are permitted subject to an approved special use permit. Article 4, Section 30-&7-2 of the Zoning Ordinance regulates broadcast towers. The applicable requirements listed in this section are as follows: Sec. 30-87-2. - Broadcasting Tower. (B) Applicability: 1. These standards shall apply to all new and replacement broadcasting towers within Roanoke County with the exception that new and replacement broadcasting towers and associated antenna not exceeding thirty (30) feet in height and located within any commercial or industrial zoning district shall be permitted by right provided: a. The proposed tower is a monopole type design; The proposed tower is a monopole design. b. The general area of the proposed tower is currently served by above ground utilities including electric power and telephone poles; and The general area of the tower is served by above ground utilities. c. All other use and design standards for the construction of the broadcasting tower and associated facilities are met. Apex will comply with all other use and design standards for the construction of the Hollins Road tower and associated facilities. 2. No modification to increase the height, size, type or location of any existing broadcasting tower or associated facilities, excluding antennas, shall be made unless such modification results in the full compliance of the broadcasting tower and facilities with all of the requirements of this ordinance. Not applicable; this is a new broadcast tower. 3. Antennas may be installed on any existing structure within the county, without the necessity of obtaining a special use permit, provided said antenna does not meet the definition of a broadcasting tower, does not increase the height of the existing structure more than ten (10) feet, and does not result in the structure and antenna exceeding the maximum structure height for that zoning district. Not applicable; this is a new broadcast tower. 4. These provisions shall not apply to any temporary broadcasting tower erected for the purpose of system design or testing provided the temporary broadcasting tower is erected for a period not to exceed twenty-one (21) days. In addition, in declared local emergency situations, the county administrator shall be authorized to allow the temporary installation of a broadcasting tower for the duration of the local emergency. A zoning 2 permit pursuant to section 30-9 of this ordinance shall be applied for and approved prior to erecting any temporary or emergency tower. Not applicable; this is a permanent broadcast tower. (C) Application requirements: 1. All potential applicants for broadcasting towers shall consult with county planning staff at least thirty (30) days prior to submitting an application for a proposed broadcasting tower. During this consultation the applicant shall present information to the staff on system objectives, proposed coverage areas, and alternative sites considered and rejected. The staff shall provide the potential applicant information on Roanoke County policies and standards for broadcasting towers, and shall discuss with the applicant possible alternatives to broadcasting tower construction. Apex conducted a pre -application meeting with the Planning Commission staff in 2014 and January 11, 2016. 2. In addition to the application requirements contained in section 30-19-2 of this ordinance, all applicants for broadcasting towers shall provide the following at the time of application: a. The location of all other proposed broadcasting tower sites considered and rejected, and the specific technical, legal or other reasons for the rejection. • While we looked at several locations outside and near the search Xing, there are no existing telecommunication towers or other structures that would meet the coverage objectives. Therefore, they were rejected. • The surrounding area is relatively rural and there are no existing structures tall enough to meet the coverage objectives. b. The location of all other possible collocation sites considered and rejected, and the specific technical, legal or other reasons for the rejection. Our anchor tenant (Verizon) is already collocated on all of the closest towers and there were no other existing structures within the search ring that are tall enough to meet the coverage objective. c. Accurate, to scale, photographic simulations showing the relationship of the proposed broadcasting tower and associated antenna to the surroundings. Photographic simulations shall also be prepared showing the relationship of any new or modified road, access or utility corridors constructed or modified to serve the proposed broadcasting tower site. The number of simulations and the perspectives from which they are prepared, shall be established with the staff at the consultation required in section C.1. above. Please see attached photo simulations. d. A computerized terrain analysis showing the visibility of the proposed broadcasting tower and antenna at the requested height and location. If new or modified road, access or utility corridors are proposed, the terrain analysis shall also show the visibility of these new or modified features. See attached computerized terrain analysis. e. Information on how the proposed site relates to the applicants existing communication system, including number of other sites within the Roanoke Valley, and the location of the antenna at each site. See attached propagation maps showing the relationship of the proposed Hollins Road tower site to other towers where Verizon has installed equipment and providing wireless services. All broadcasting tower applicants shall be required, at their expense to conduct an on-site "balloon" or comparable test prior to the planning commission and board of supervisors hearings on the special use permit. The purpose of this test shall be to demonstrate the potential visual impact of the proposed tower. The dates and periods of these tests shall be established with the applicant at the pre -application consultation. An on-site balloon test will be conducted from Ipm to Spm on the day the neighborhood meeting is scheduled. During the pre -application meeting we set a preliminary date during the first week of March and the staff will inform me of the exact date after the application is tiled. g. Written verification that all required submittals to the FAA as required by section 30-87-2(D)6 of this ordinance have been submitted. Apex is required by Federal law to comply with all FAA requirements when constructing a new tower. Apex has received the required approvals from. the FAA to construct this tower. 3. The applicant shall be responsible for all fees associated with the filing of the application including the reasonable cost of any independent analysis deemed necessary by the county to verify the need for the new broadcasting tower. The board of supervisors shall establish these fees, which shall be discussed with the applicant at the pre -application conference. These fees were discussed during the pre -application conference and a check is attached to cover these fees. (D) General standards: I . The maximum height of any proposed broadcasting tower and associated antenna shall be made as a condition of the special use permit, but in no case shall any broadcasting tower and antenna exceed one hundred ninety-nine (199) feet in height. Applicants shall request the lowest broadcasting tower and antenna height necessary to accomplish their specific communication objectives. The proposed Hollins Road tower is to be designed and built to a height of 154 feet (including a 4' lightning rod), which is the lowest height necessary to achieve Verizon's 21 coverage objective and allow other wireless carriers sufficient height to meet similar coverage objectives. 2. The setback for any proposed broadcasting tower shall, at a minimum, conform to the requirements for principal structures for the proposed zoning district. However, in no case shall the minimum setback from the base of the broadcasting tower to any residential structure on an adjoining lot be less than forty (40) percent of the height of the tower, measured from the closest structural member of the broadcasting tower (excluding guy lines). Guy lines shall be exempt from the minimum setback requirements in side and rear yards for the respective zoning district, but shall comply with the setback requirements for the front yard. Forty percent (40%) of the height of the proposed Hollins Road tower is 62'. There are no residential structures within several hundred feet of the proposed tower location. 3. The minimum setback from any property line abutting a road right-of-way for any other building or structure associated with a broadcasting tower shall be fifty (50) feet. Such buildings or structures shall be located a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet from any other property line. The closest property line is 75.9 feet from the Northern Southern Corporation (railroad) property line (i.e. rear property line) and over 200 feet from all other property lines. The position of the tower complies with these minimum requirements. 4. More than one (1) broadcasting tower shall be permitted on a lot provided all applicable requirements have been met including setback requirements. We are proposing to construct only one tower on this lot. 5. Broadcasting towers shall not be illuminated with any type of lighting apparatus, unless such lighting is a requirement of the FAA or FCC. When lighting is proposed to conform to federal requirement, the county shall contact the federal agency to verify the necessity of lighting, and to determine the minimal amount and type of lighting necessary to comply with federal guidelines. Security lighting, or a "down lighting" design may be installed on buildings and structures associated with a broadcasting tower. In no case shall any lighting violate section 30-94 of this ordinance. Please see attached FAA Aeronautical Study No. 2015 -AEA -3048 -OE issued on 06/1612015. The FAA conducted an aeronautical study and concluded that the proposed Hollins Road tower does not exceed obstruction standards and therefore, lighting is not necessary. 6. Any proposed broadcasting tower within two (2) miles from any general or commercial airport or located at a ground elevation at or above two thousand (2,000) feet, average mean sea level, shall be referred to the appropriate regional office of the FAA for review and comment prior to filing an application for a special use permit. Please see attached FAA Aeronautical Study No. 2015 -AEA -3048 -OE issued on 06/16/2015. The FAA conducted an aeronautical study and concluded that the proposed Hollins Road tower does not exceed obstruction standards and therefore, lighting is not necessary. As a matter of reference, the proposed Hollins Road tower site is 2.32 miles to the closest runway of Roanoke Regional Airport. 5 7. All broadcasting towers shall comply with any additional requirements established in the airport overlay district in section 30-72 of this ordinance, and the emergency communications overlay district in section 30-73. Apex agrees to comply with any additional requirements established in the airport overlay district in section 30-72 of this ordinance, and the emergency communications overlay district in section 30-73, if they become applicable in the future. 8. Any broadcasting tower approved shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading, and the site approved shall be sized to accommodate the additional equipment necessary for at least three (3) other vendors/providers of communications services in order to minimize the proliferation of new broadcasting towers in the vicinity of the requested site. In addition, by applying and being granted the special use permit, the applicant and the owner of the land agree to make the broadcasting tower and tower site available for additional leases within the structural capacity of the broadcasting tower and at reasonable costs adequate to recover the capital, operating and maintenance costs of the broadcasting tower location required for the additional capacity. The proposed monopole tower will be structurally designed and constructed to accommodate the equipment necessary for at least three (3) additional wireless communication providers and for Roanoke County to install equipment to provide emergency services, if needed. Apex Towers will provide tower space to Roanoke County for emergency services purposes at no charge. 9. A monopole broadcasting tower design is recommended. The board may approve an alternative broadcasting tower design if it finds that an alternative type of structure has less of a visual impact on the surrounding community and Roanoke County, and/or based upon accepted technical and engineering data a monopole design is not technically feasible. Cost shall not be a criteria for determining broadcasting tower design. As recommended by this section of the ordinance, we are proposing a monopole tower design for the Hollins Road site. 10. No broadcasting towers shall be permitted within the critical viewsheds of the Blue Ridge Parkway or Appalachian Trail as shown on any official map designating these viewsheds and pre -approved by the board of supervisors. In addition, no towers shall be proposed within any other designated area of local scenic, historical, ecological and cultural importance as designated and approved by the board of supervisors prior to the filing of a tower application. The proposed tower is not within the critical viewsheds of the Blue Ridge Parkway or Appalachian Trail. 11. By applying and being granted the special use permit, the applicant and the owner of the land agree to dismantle and remove the broadcasting tower and associated facilities from the site within ninety days of the broadcasting tower no longer being use for wireless communications. Dismantling and removal from the site shall only be required after notice by the County. If antennas on any approved tower are relocated to a lower elevation, the tower shall be shortened to the height of the highest antenna. A bond or similar performance guarantee may be required as part of the special use permit approval. Said guarantee will be in an amount sufficient to ensure removal of the tower and all associated facilities and the reclamation of the property and road, access and utility corridors to a condition that existed prior to tower construction. Apex agrees to dismantle and remove the broadcasting tower and associated facilities from the site within ninety days of the broadcasting tower no longer being used for wireless communications. Apex Towers has also made a similar commitment to the property owner to dismantle and remove the facilities. Please see Section L of the Option and Lease Agreement attached hereto. 12. All broadcasting tower structures and associated hardware, antennas, and facilities shall be a flat matted finish so as to reduce visibility and light reflection unless otherwise required by the FCC or FAA. The Hollins Road tower structure and associated hardware, antennas, and facilities will be designed and constructed with a flat matted finish so as to reduce visibility and light reflection. The FCC or FAA have not required any other finishes. 13. No business signs shall be allowed on the property identifying the name of, or services offered by, any business associated with the broadcasting tower. There will be no signage on the tower identifying the name of, or services offered by, any business associated with the broadcasting tower. (E) General review policies: All special use permit requests for new broadcasting towers, including the replacement or modification of existing broadcasting towers shall be reviewed by the staff, planning commission and board of supervisors on the basis of the following criteria: 1. The extent to which the broadcasting tower proposal conforms to the general special use permit criteria in section 30-19 of this ordinance, and the intent, application requirements, and general standards for broadcasting towers found in these provisions. The proposed Hollins Road tower will meet or exceed all special use permit criteria in section 30-19 of the ordinance, and the intent, application requirements, and general standards for broadcasting towers found in these provisions. 2. The demonstrated willingness of the applicant to evaluate collocation opportunities within the proposed communication service area, and the demonstrated history of the applicant choosing collocation sites within the Roanoke Valley. Apex is in the business of constructing and owning broadcast towers and leasing space on the towers to telecommunication providers. Apex does not own any FCC licenses and therefore, does not have any legal right to broadcast any wireless services. Accordingly, we have no need to collocate on sites in the Roanoke Valley. Our anchor tenant (Verizon) has agreed to collocate on our tower as documented in our agreement attached hereto and not build a separate tower because of the following: 7 1) Our tower meets its coverage objectives, 2) There are no existing towers or other suitable structures within the search ring that would meet the same coverage objectives, and 3) It is much cheaper for Verizon to collocate on a tower than incurring the entire costs to build a separate tower. 3. The base and top elevation of the proposed broadcasting tower relative to surrounding natural land forms. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, broadcasting tower locations below surrounding ridge lines are preferred. The proposed Hollins Road tower will be located in a relatively flat area where it will be below the ridgeline to the east known as Read Mountain. Please see photo simulation #4 which shows the tower will be below the ridgeline. 4. Broadcasting tower locations already served by existing roads and utilities are preferred due to the potential detrimental environmental and visual impacts resulting from the construction of new road and utility corridors. As requested by the property owner, Apex will need to build a short access road to the lease area behind the existing building as reflected on the construction drawings attached hereto. The property owner made this specific request for the location of the short access road to preserve the property to the east of the existing building in the event he needs to expand the building to accommodate a current or future tenant. Apex and Verizon will use existing utilities and extend them to the lease area underground to minimize any detrimental environmental and visual impacts. 5. Within the needed service area, the availability of other existing structures that are, based upon independent analysis, of suitable height, design, and location for the needed antenna. There are no other suitable structures within the service area.. 6. The visibility of the broadcasting tower from the surrounding community and neighborhood compatibility of the tower as determined by the submitted computer simulations, terrain analysis and balloon or comparable test. The attached photo simulations and computerized terrain analysis were created to show the visibility of the proposed tower from the surrounding community and neighborhoods from four different viewpoints. We believe these documents show that the proposed tower will have limited visibility from surrounding streets and residences, and from two separate viewpoints, almost no visibility (Photos #3 and #4). 7. The degree to which the proposed tower location, site design and facilities including fencing, buildings and other ground mounted equipment and new or modified road, access or utility corridors are located, designed and constructed to be compatible with the neighborhood. Apex has planned the tower location and facilities to have limited visibility. Specifically, the tower site has been located and designed as follows to reduce visual effects: • Apex has selected a location behind the existing industrial building where existing mature trees will surround and screen the compound on the west and south sites, the 0 railroad tracks and right of way on the east side and the existing building to the north side; • Apex has chosen a location on the property on the edge of a wooded area where only a few trees will need to be removed for construction of the compound and access road and visibility from the ground level is almost not existent from all angles; • The proposed access road will run parallel with the railroad property which will not be visible from almost every angle; ,. r 1� 0 V W 0 0 Mead alunt 2C Letter -Revised Site Name: h,leatl &. t Irmt. III(. t'rl & II Atclulecltur. I�lr. 100 Tracy Wq. 5uile 200 (IsarlNon, West Virginia 25311 104- 345-67 1 ? II("I(lhin It. Com H I G H L A N D T Q W E R R Roanoke County, VA HOLLINS ROAD Location: City: Roanoke, VA County: Roanoke U.S.G.S. Quadrangle: Roanoke, VA NAD 83) Latitude: N 37° 19'44.900" Longitude: W 790 55'32.475" NAD 27) Latitude: N 37° 19' 44.411" Longitude: W 790 55'33.334" Existing Site Elevation 1042.4'± AMSL Date: February 23, 2015 I certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the horizontal and vertical datum is accurate to 2C Reporting requirements of ±50 feet horizontally and ±20 feet vertically. The horizontal datum (coordinates) are in terms of the North American Datum 1927 (NAD 27) and 1983 (NAD 83) and expressed as degrees, minutes and seconds. The vertical datum (heights) are in terms of the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) and are determined to the nearest tenth of a foot. 'Tt Q O CARL J. BOWYER Lic. No. 0402051626 WOMAN", 1626 Gr I':TTULTyN}� 1 - ,y.•4Crn / i•1. r Y Q '!!40 311 l, �• li L �r 'r '' /''a I.� II •}.art •1 130C)S IQ �r •` � � 1 f r ' � / � : �• - 112 / r.� r •. � A IV 100 (26 4 . 0 I . •r.. I 1f,<. � • l/ . " 4[1$ ', q, '` F rf I � _ �. • , �;. , � r '�j. I � � � o :, - I, u k I `� f i�` � fir; `• � " , •.'I 1 / f-` �• d � ' Il �•� .ate: f .:� Y'! ,� t � 't� • �x��1)1111i4� F�' K� . {j • �� � • �r �f� �'}�4 4„`f�kl� - i'2000 a�"/ 601 ."rJ,��l + •_���' � ittuffha,llt� . �`• � '' � ,/! � , .7�r r. �' �++ �, .. r}C1A f{ l`+1! 1(11 rh� yt lc izN as �a F '. ���t� ' 5 �• ' - '.i. ; ! `� [I,t r;urf \l�At;;il' '"��".f'r J r r � ' I 1 11, �+' / l -)�}� 1 ~Q rl' t ,•�a• • it jjlw, I t� l '� �� � � – �/ i i'Ik'' �t''1 ��.�i�..lrf:, f rtl� �II/4 1I -� -r• �f14 fir' 'iy� a •.S t \I-unt:uu t io •� ,, i I i �� � l � (r �. >7 ''In l"I �' �_-- `r;,���;'` �, Iii`,, ;��•. /�� .`!8 {i�,��� 1i lrr; ��`�� `ti �l(/f'l �i ��'.�.� .� s \� cr�.-.1/ � a.\ -° 1 ill �5 r :�} %/� `,! '"�1 t• � � {�,�J F/�`��t-1 �Y �1y •t ( ,~Air•• tlF4' � ` n 01 �: r,. •r �aJ f %Y� ( r..%,�, �,1 j �' _, �I•�I ,v ./+' I•I. � „'� ' •a rh �'` ` � ✓l �{ a$' ' f ��, �'� C C'� Z; � I:• i r 1 I •t - :-mss' _ �^' r � � li �SV • 1 �h da. f _ 4 �'- I fif qg%r'' � f �I/T� f �5y1` ✓ 4�+c=� JA �i i `i4 2� i• rl� l �i �� f r �. + t f, ,.�, tt ,i � f �� � �•• l � �� ':4 ,� =t { � e j —� –t -,r ' .; f >j .,llh�� r +I � ����p, t`• til �'I; ' 1 -� `�!~`moi i 1. � 1. ,��-:S�f. � ��+.•� 4 _ �.�. I 1� � ��. ';//pfj• `'�<`'yial, I 4 �,.� tl ilu,f�,Y • 1 + 7.. � �, � r � k.� -�'•' + �+ f 444r1' I � r rric � i •\ / _ 4 .tl I •f. e r I� 1 l" t, f �O Plrr.S runr �S•E_ II ;1r ,' �• � i.• , � ,... rff'� f� -1100 iF 1L7 � � f • a •�a--. III Declination I'111x a ilio' all I � N R r �:. 1' INC, 0 I�ri ��' �1�} f 01 u1se�<' SCALE 1:24000 0 _ 1MILE v.V-14 11 {•� 0 1000 YAWS Uri MN 8° 22' W p 1 KILOMETER Name: ROANOKE Location: 0370 19'44.90" N 0790 55'32.48" W Date: 02/23/15 Scale: 1 inch = 2,000 ft. G-PYlul"1 CC) 2W91AYTopv LISTING OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS PROPERTY SUBJECT TO LEASE - 0 Address of Property: 5119 Hollins Road, Roanoke, VA Property Owner: Mistele Declaration of Trust, William Mistele, Trustee 5239 Summer Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 Tax ID Number: 039.09-01-07.00-0000 Magisterial District: Hollins ADJOINING PROPERTY -1 Address of Property: 5235 Hollins Road, Roanoke, VA Property Owner: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PO Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Tax ID Number: 039.05-02-04.00-0000 Magisterial District: Hollins ADJOINING PROPERTY - 2 Address of Property: 0 Carlos Drive, Roanoke, VA Property Owner: Carl Dudley and Pamela Hope Jannay 5403 Meadowcrest Street Roanoke, VA 24019 Tax ID Number: 039.01-01-04.00-0000 Magisterial District: Hollins ADJOINING PROPERTY - 3 Address of Property: 0 Carlos Drive, Roanoke, VA Property Owner: Carl Dudley Jannay and Pamela Hope Jannay 5403 Meadowcrest Street Roanoke, VA 24019 Tax ID Number: 039.01-01-05.00-0000 Magisterial District: Hollins 1 LISTING OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS ADJOINING PROPERTY - 4 Address of Property: 5075 Hollins Road, Roanoke, VA Property Owner: Debra C. Moore 6214 Chip Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 Tax ID Number: 039.09-01-06.00-0000 Magisterial District: Hollins ADJOINING PROPERTY - 5 Address of Property: 5022 Hollins Road, Roanoke, VA Property Owner: Ardagh Metal Packaging USA, Inc. 500 North Bell Avenue Building 1, Suite 200 Carnegie, PA 15106 Tax ID Number: 039.09-01-02.01-0000 Magisterial District: Hollins ADJOINING PROPERTY - 6 Address of Property: 0 Hollins Road, Roanoke, VA Property Owner: Toma Properties, Inc. 3019 Yardley Drive, N. W. Roanoke, VA 24012 Tax ID Number: 039.09-01-02.00-0000 Magisterial District: Hollins ADJOINING PROPERTY - 7 Address of Property: 5213 Lois Lane, Roanoke, VA Property Owner: Robert E. Kelley 5213 Lois Lane Roanoke, VA 24019 Tax ID Number: 039.05-01-13.00-0000 Magisterial District: Hollins 2 LISTING OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS ADJOINING PROPERTY - 8 Address of Property: 5288 Lois Lane, Roanoke, VA Property Owner Tax ID Number: Magisterial District: Cranwell, Corliss, Mullins William Clive Cranwell, II 110 Draper Road, N. W. Suite B Blacksburg, VA 24060 038.08-03-29.00-0000 Hollins y wyf H 00 TiA C L i _ c 7-1 �w a� W o cq 3 LL co N O u�gNO Z Sn � Y v c g y ° c m ?£CE,S �mlpf; i7�m�a9�s88._.tL°n'Sn op 00 TiA C L i 7-1 �w a� W o cq 3 LL co N O u�gNO Z Sn cg O q w 9 pt c v c g y OD Ti �LOuOy 2�m "0. ?£CE,S �mlpf; i7�m�a9�s88._.tL°n'Sn op 0 Property Location: 5119 HOLLINS RD Parcel ID: 039.09-01-07.00-0000 - Magisterial District: HOLLINS Account: 13841 Card 1 of 1 Owner Name and Mailing Address: MISTELE DECLARATION OF TRUST ;MISTELE WILLIAM H TRUSTE 5239 SUMMER DR ROANOKE VA 24019 Current Property Assessment 2016 Total Building Value: 247000 Total Land Value: 178600 Total Value: 425600 Narrative Description This property contains 4.58000 AC of land with a(n) WAREHOUSE style building, Built about 1977, having primary MODULAR METAL exterior and RUBBER roof cover, 0 bedroom(s), 0 full bath(s), 0 half bath(s). 0 Property Characteristics Jurisdiction: COUNTY 6/5/2003 Legal Description: TINKER CREEK DBO200313233 Deeded Acreage: 4.58000 AC Neighborhood: F010 / HOLLINS RD COMMERCIAL &INDUSTRIAL Estimated Acreage: 4.72176458 AC Census Block: 511610302032042 Vacant Land: NO Land Use Program: NO 77000 Sales Information NEEDS REVIEW Most Recent Sales Sale Date Sale Price Lezal Reference Sales Description 3/1/2006 0 DB0200604785 FAMILY /RELATED PARTIES / TRUST 6/5/2003 0 DBO200313233 FAMILY / RELATED PARTIES / TRUST 6/2/2000 0 DB0016591868 NEEDS REVIEW 5/1/1977 77000 DBOO11881233 NEEDS REVIEW 1/1/1900 0 PBO106500678 PLAT 1 1/18/2016 Itc)r�wlcrE� f�_ #�:OUN I Y Property Location: 5119 HOLLINS RD Parcel 1D: 039,09-01-07.00-0000 Magisterial District: HOLLINS Account: 13841 Card 1 of 1 Split: NO Zoning Code County -I2 Action No: Date: Ordinance: Name: Zoning Information Zoning Description County-12/industrial (Heavy) District n C 4 2 1/18/2016 RIR WNt��kk1= N, I Y Property Location: 5235 HOLLINS RD Parcel 10: 039.05-02-04.00-0000 Magisterial District: HOLLINS Account: 13819 Card 1 of 1 Owner Name and Mailing Address: ROANOKE CO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P O BOX 29800 ROANOKE VA 24018 Current Property Assessment 2016 Total Building Value: 3933100 Total Land Value: 537000 Total Value: 4470100 Narrative Description This property contains 9.17900 AC of land with a(n) OTHER COUNTY style building, Built about 2009, having primary CONCRETE BLOCK exterior and RUBBER roof cover, 0 bedroom(s), 0 full bath(s), 0 half bath(s). Property Characteristics Jurisdiction: COUNTY Legal Description: TR 1 COMB FOR ROANOKE CO BOARDOF SUPERVI Deeded Acreage: 9.17900 AC Neighborhood: FO10 / HOLLINS RD COMMERCIAL &INDUSTRIAL Estimated Acreage: 8.72012682 AC Census Block: 511610302032041 Vacant Land: NO Land Use Program. NO Sales Information Most Recent Sales Sale Date Sale Price Legal Reference Sales Description 2/21/2008 0 P13200802243 PLAT 9/25/2007 402500 DB0200715114 9/21/2007 0 PB0200714849 10/5/2006 0 WB0200600493 12/98/2003 0 DBO200330678 1/1/1900 0 DB0008470176 GOVERNMENT AGENCY INVOLVED PLAT FAMILY / RELATED PARTIES / TRUST NEEDS REVIEW NEEDS REVIEW 1 1/18/2016 Property Location: 5235 HOLLINS RD Parcel ID: 039.05-02-04.00-0000 Magisterial District: HOLLINS Account: 13819 Card 1 of I Zoning Information Split: NO Zoning Code Zoning Description County -I28 County-12S/Industrial (Heavy) District w/ Special Use Action No: 08-04/2008 Date: 4/1/2008 Ordinance: 042208-18 Name: RC BROADCAST TOWEF 1S far. R1 2 1/1812016 I ItCjh'VCliwt_�tt_:C)l1CV f'1' Property Location: 0 CARLOS DR + 4 Parcel ID: 039,01-01-04.00-0000 Magisterial District: HOLLINS Account: 13525 + iarr Card 1 of 1 Owner Name and Mailing Address: JANNAY CARL DUDLEY;JANNAY PAMELA HOPE 5403 MEADOWCREST ST ROANOKE VA 24019 Current Property Assessment 2016 Total Building Value: 0 Total Land Value: 26100 Total Value: 26100 2 Narrative Description This property contains 1.06000 AC of land with a(n) NIA style building, Built about NIA, having primary NIA secondary NIA exterior and N/A roof cover, NIA bedroom(s), NIA full bath(s), N/A half bath(s). Property Characteristics Jurisdiction: COUNTY Legal Description: BELL GROVE Deeded Acreage: 1.06000 AC Neighborhood: D073 / BEAUMONT Estimated Acreage: 0.89686529 AC Census Block: 5116103I2021007 Vacant Land: YES Land Use Program: NO Sales Information Most Recent Sales Sale Date Sale Price Legal Reference Sales Description 10/28/2004 0 WB0200400489 MULTI PARCEL SALE 5/1/1990 0 D130013240247 NEEDS REVIEW 1 1/18/2016 Property Location: 0 CARLOS DR Parcel ID: 039,01-01-04,00-0000 Magisterial District: HOLLINS Account: 13525 Card 1 of 1 Zoning Information split: NO Zoning Cade Zoning Description County -R1 County-RI/Low Density Residential Action No: Date: Ordinance• Name• 1�J 'I J) 6616 Ri 1/18/2016 z W Msi OK:t ---- 4"c.iClN I Y VI f.k;i-,fc Property location: 0 CARLOS DR Parcel Ill: 039.01-01-05.00-0000 Magisterial District: HOLLINS Account: 13526 Card 1 of 1 Owner Name and Mailing Address: JANNAY CARL DUDLEY,JANNAY PAMELA HOPE 5403 MEADOWCREST ST ROANOKE VA 24019 Current Property Assessment 2016 Total Building Value: 0 Total Land Value: 132700 Total Value: 132700 3 Narrative Description This property contains 12.16000 AC of land with a(n) N/A style building, Built about NIA, having primary NIA secondary NIA exterior and NIA roof cover, NIA bedroom(s), N/A full bath(s), NIA half bath(s). Jurisdiction: COUNTY Legal Description: BELL GROVE Deeded Acreage: 12.16000 AC Estimated Acreage: 12.8I53598 AC Vacant Land: YES Property Characteristics Neighborhood: D073 / BEAUMONT Census Block; 511610312021005 Land Use Program: NO Sales Information Most Recent Sales Sale Date Sale Price Legal Reference Sales Description 10/28/2004 0 WB0200400489 MULTI PARCEL SALE 1118/2016 3 Itt)ANc}E4! L`cMNI I Y Property Location: 0 CARLOS DR Parcel ID: 039.01-01-05.00-0000 Magisterial District: HOLLINS Account. 13526 Card 1 of 1 Zoning Information Split: NO Zoning Code Zoning Description County -R1 Counly-R1/Low Density Residential Action No: Date: Ordinance: Name: 2 1/18/2016 4 Property Location: 5075 HOLLINS RD Parcel ID: 039.09-01-06.00-0000 r;-='•,. Magisterial District: HOLLINS , Account: 13840 t rte Card 1 of 1 Owner Name and Mailing Address: MOORE DEBRA C 6214 CHIP CIR ROANOKE VA 24018 Current Property Assessment 2016 Total Building Value: 646400 Total Land Value: 117300 Total Value: 763700 Narrative Description This property contains 3.48000 AC of land with a(n) OFFICE /WAREHOUSE style building, Built about 1987, having primary MODULAR METAL secondary CONCRETE BLOCK exterior and MODULAR METAL OR METAL roof cover, 0 bedroom(s), 0 full bath(s), 0 half bath(s), 1 1/18/2016 Property Characteristics Jurisdiction: COUNTY Legal Description: TINKER CREEK SUBD FOR HINMAN ESTATE Deeded Acreage: 3.48000 AC Neighborhood: F010 / HOLLINS RD COMMERCIAL &INDUSTRIAL Estimated Acreage: 3.54749659 AC Census Block: 511610302032042 Vacant Land: NO band Use Program: NO Sales Information Most Recent Sales Sale Date Sale Price Legal Reference Sales Description 1/6/2006 725000 DB0200600291 BUILDING CHANGED AFTER SALE 3/30/2000 600000 DB0016521207 QUALIFIED 3/1/2000 0 DBOO16521204 NEEDS REVIEW 5/10/1995 0 DB0014731816 NEEDS REVIEW 2/1/1995 0 DB0014670677 NEEDS REVIEW 1/1/1900 0 PB0001700138 PLAT 1 1/18/2016 ROAilNt )1+ kIRK r A IN I Y' Property Location: 5075 HOLLINS RD Parcel ID: 039.09-01-06.00-0000 Magisterial District: HOLLINS Account: 13840 Card 1 of 1 Zoning Information Split: IES Zoning Code Zoning Descri tion County -12 Count -12/lndustrial(Heavy) District County -11 County-]I/industrial (Light) District Action No: Date: Ordinance: Name: 4 1/18/2016 It(.EA 4k DKi Property Location: 5022 HOLLINS RD Parcel ID: 039.09-01-02.01-0000 Magisterial District: HOLLINS Account: 13838 Card 1 of 1 Owner Name and Mailing Address: ARDAGH METAL PACKAGING USA INC 600 NORTH BELL AVE BLDG I STE 200 CARNEGIE PA 15106 Current Property Assessment 2016 Total Building Value: 13359700 Total Land Value: 1166100 Total Value: 14525800 E Narrative Description This property contains 41.01000 AC of land with a(n) LIGHT MANUFACTURING style building, Built about 1995, having primary MODULAR METAL exterior and BUILT UP TAIL & GRAVEL roof cover, 0 bedroom(s), 0 foil bath(s), 0 half bath(s). Property Characteristics Jurisdiction. COUNTY Legal Description: TR 2 SUBD OF PRO OF FRIENDSHIPMANOR APT Deeded Acreage: 41.01000 AC Neighborhood: F010 / HOLLINS RD COMMERCIAL &INDUSTRIAL Estimated Acreage: 41.98805692 AC Census Block: 511610302032038 Vacant Land: NO Land Use Program: NO Sales information Most Recent Sales Sale Date Sale Price Legal Reference Sales Description 7/31/2013 14500000 DB201310206 MULTI PARCEL SALE 6/14/1994 0 DB0014481055 NEEDS REVIEW 3/1/1994 703200 DB0014380360 NEEDS REVIEW 1/1/1900 0 PBO144801057 PLAT 1/18/2016 A(}ANt�a I:-I�d! X41Cv°Iti` Property Location: 5022 HOLLINS RD Parcel ID: 039.09-01-02,01-0000 Magisterial District: HOLLINS Account: 13839 Card 1 of 1 Zoning Information Split: YES Zoning Code Zoning Description County-IIC Couni -IIC/Industrial Li ht Distriet w/ Conditions County -11 County -II /industrial _(Light) District Action No: 37-11/1989 _1 Date: 11/1/1989 C # Ordinance: 22790-5 Name: RC BOS FRIENDSHIP M -A 1s2 R# P`;=f R2 11C r 2 1/1812018 R(.)r `Nc: KE. (.()41t4 I Y Property Location: 0 HOLLINS RD Parcel ID: 039.09-01-02.00-0000 Magisterial District; HOLLINS Account: 13837 Card 1 of 1 Owner Name and Mailing Address: TDMA PROPERTIES LLC 3019 YARDLEY DR N W ROANOKE VA 24012 Current Property Assessment 2016 Total Building Value: 0 Total Land Value: 522200 Total Value: 522200 Narrative Description This property contains 14.90380 AC of land with a(n) N/A style building, Built about NIA, having primary NIA secondary N/A exterior and NIA roof cover, N/A bedroom(s), N/A full bath(s), N/A half bath(s). Property Characteristics Jurisdiction: COUNTY Legal Description: TR I SUR FOR TOMA PROPERTIES LLC OFF HO Deeded Acreage: 14.90380 AC Neighborhood: FO 10 / HOLLINS RD COMMERCIAL &INDUSTRIAL Estimated Acreage: 14.01452233 AC Census Block: 511610302032038 Vacant Land: YES Land Use Program: NO Sales Information Most Recent Sales Sale Date Sale Price Legal Reference Sales Description 2/13/2015 300000 DB201501102 DIRECT SALE (OWNER TO OWNER) 2113!2015 0 PB201501102 PLAT 1/7/2004 0 DB0200400300 GOVERNMENT AGENCY INVOLVED 5/30/2002 375000 DBO200210809 EXEMPT PARTY INVOLVED IN SALE 4/5/1994 0 DBOO14410607 NEEDS REVIEW 3/9/1994 0 DBOO14380360 NEEDS REVIEW 1 1/18/2016 lLtlrivc�[�t 4.:[AjN1Y Property Location: 0 HOLLINS RD Parcel ID: 039.09-01-02.00-0000 Magisterial District: HOLLINS Account: 13837 Card 1 of 1 Zoning Information Split: NO Zoning Code Zoning Description County -C1 County-Cl/Low Intensity Commercial District Action No: 05-03/2002 Date: 3/1/2002 Ordinance: 051402-8 Name: FELLOWSHIP BAPT. CHI Action No: 37-11/1989 Late- 3/1/2002 Ordinance: 22790-5 Name: FELLOWSHIP BAPT. CHI 2 1/1812016 li()s'i:ti:(eKE t_c i_tiN I Property Location: 5213 LOIS LN Parcel ID: 039.05-01-13.00-0000 Magisterial District: HOLLINS Account: 13812 Card 1 of 1 Owner Name and Mailing Address: KELLEY ROBERT E 5213 LOIS LANE ROANOKE VA 24019 sorry, we have no imagery here. Current Property Assessment 2016 Total Building Value: 67300 Total Land Value: 30000 Total Value: 97300 Narrative Description This property contains 0.78000 AC of land with a(n) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE style building, Built about 1875, having primary ALUMINUM OR VINYL exterior and MODULAR METAL OR METAL roof cover, 3 bedroom(s), I full bath(s), 0 half bath(s). Property Characteristics Jurisdiction: COUNTY Legal Description: NEW TR C-1 WEST SIDE HOLLINS RD Deeded Acreage: 0.78000 AC Neighborhood: D080 / HOLLINS ROAD AREA Estimated Acreage: 0.82395133 AC Census Block: 511610302032038 Vacant Land: NO Land Use Program: NO Sales Information Most Recent Sales Sale Date Sale Price Legal Reference Sales Description 10/1/2003 0 DB0200325595 SPLIT 6/10/2003 0 DBO200313545 SPLIT 1/1/1988 0 DB0412780171 NEEDS REVIEW 1/9/1900 0 PBO127800174 PLAT 1/1/1900 0 DB00121 11287 UNKNOWN REASON 1 1/18/2016 Property Location: 5213 LOIS LN Parcel IDD: 039.05-01-13.00-0000 Magisterial District: HOLLINS Account: 13812 Card 1 of 1 Zoning Information Split: NO Zoning Code Zoning Description County -C2 County-C2/Hiph Intensity Commercial District Action No: Date: Ordinance: Name - 7 2 1/18/2016 1t(.)A'4CDtc.k: +IC:rA1NtY Property Location: 5288 LOIS LN Parcel ID: 039.08-03-29.00-0000 Magisterial District: HOLLINS Account: 12338 Card 1 of t Owner Name and Mailing Address: CRANWELL CORLISS MULLINS;CRANWELL WILLIAM CLIVE II;AN I 10 DRAPER RD NW STE B 13LACKSBURG VA 24060 Sorry. we have no imagery hese. Current Property Assessment 2016 Total Building Value: 0 Total Land Value: 82000 Total Value; 82000 Narrative Description This property contains 14.23000 AC of land with a(n) N/A style building, Built about NIA, having primary N/A secondary NIA exterior and NIA roof cover, NIA bedroom(s), NIA full bath(s), NIA half bath(s). Property Characteristics Jurisdiction: COUNTY Legal Description: R B SUED FOR OAKS DEV CORP & WILLIAM C C Deeded Acreage: 14.23000 AC Neighborhood: D080 / HOLLINS ROAD AREA Estimated Acreage: 14.73630573 AC Census Block: 511610302032038 Vacant Land: YES Land Use Program: NO Sales Information Most Recent Sales Sale Date Sale Price Leaal Reference Sales Description 6/28/2011 0 DB201106150 FAMILY / RELATED PARTIES / TRUST 1/28/2004 0 DB0200401370 FAMILY / RELATED PARTIES / TRUST 1/1/1995 0 13130014651439 NEEDS REVIEW 1/1/1994 0 DB0014410604 NEEDS REVIEW 10/29/1993 90200 DB0014221644 ADJACENT OWNER PURCHASE 1/1/1900 0 PB0001700055 PLAT 1 1/18/2016 Property Location: 5288 LOIS LN Parcel ID: 038.08-03-29.00-0000 Magisterial District: HOLLINS Account: 12338 Card 1 of 1 Zoning Information Split: NO Zoning Code Zoning Description County -R2 County-RVMedium Density Residential Action No: Date: Ordinance: Name.• S X1- .. 3-- 2 9!1812016 HBXX-6517DS-VTM • Partners • Resources Uesources/) • Thinking Ahead (/ThinkingAhead/) • Lpgln urnempersnlp/gerault.aSpx} • Choose Language Page 2 of 7 Home Product Cataloq (/Product -Catalog) Wireless (/Product-CatalogANirelessa catalo ima esCache 0000003 t006 r02103 v5.' U V i4 (I1 t31 Y V 1[1 (addtoproject.aspx?id=15654&company=andrew)HBXX-6517DS-1/TM a u_ AndrewO Quad Port Antenna, 1710-2180 MHz, 650 horizontal beamwidth, RET compatible _ • Superior azimuth tracking and pattern symmetry with excellent passive intermodulation suppression Soecificatlons (product details.aspx?1d=15654) Related Products (product detalls.aspx?Id=15654&tab=2) Documents/Tools (product details.aspx?id=15654&tab=3) http://www. commseope.com/catalog/andrew/product_details.aspx?id=15654 1/6/2016 HBXX-6517DS-VTM Page 3 of 7 Electrical Specifications Frequency 'Band, MHz 1710-1880 1850-1990 1920-2180 Gain, dBl 19.0 19.1 19.2 Beamwidth, Horizontal, degrees 67 66 65 Beamwidth, Vertical, degrees 5.0 4.7 4.4 Beam Tilt, degrees 0-6 0-6 0-6 USLS (First Lobe), dB 18 18 18 Front -to -Back Ratio at 1800, dB 30 30 30 CPR at Boresight, dB 21 22 21 CPR at Sector, dB 10 11 9 Isolation, dB 30 30 30 VSWR I Return Loss, dB 1.4 1 15.6 1.4 1 15.6 1.4 1 15.6 PIM, 3rd Order, 2 x 20 W, dBc -153 -153 -153 Input Power per Port, maximum, 350 350 350 watts Gain by all Beam Tilts Tolerance, f0.4 ±0.3 Polarization ±450 ±450 ±450 Impedance 50 ohm 50 ohm 50 ohm Electrical Specifications, BASTA* v Frequency Band, MHz 1710-1880 1850-1990 1920-2180 a Gain by all Beam Tilts, average, 18.5 18.6 18.8 he U dBi L Gain by all Beam Tilts Tolerance, f0.4 ±0.3 ±0,4 dB Gain by Beam Tilt, average, dBi 0- 18.4 0 ° 1 18.4 0- 18.7 3°18.7 3°118.7 3°18.9 6- 18.4 6- 1 18.5 6- 18.6 http://www.commscope. com/catalog/anch-ew/product_details.aspx?id-15654 1/6/2016 HBXX-6517DS-VTM Page 4 of 7 Beamwidth, Horizontal t2.4 f1.7 12.9 Tolerance, degrees Beamwidth, Vertical Tolerance, ±0.3 t0.3 t0.3 degrees USLS, beampeak to 200 above 18 19 19 beampeak, dB Front -to -Back Total Power at 25 26 26 1800 f 3011, dB a� CPR at Boresight, dB 22 23 22 CPR at Sector, dB 10 10 9 * CommScope(P supports NGMN recommendations on Base Station Antenna Standards (BASTA). To learn more about the benefits of BASTA, download the whitepaper Time to Raise the Bar on BSAs. (http://Info.commscope.com/2014-Gated-Assetts BASTA TimeToRaiseBarOnBSAs WP -108068 --- LP.html) Color General Specifications Antenna Brand Andrew@ Antenna Type DualPol® quad Lightning Protection Band Single band Brand DualPol@ I Teletilt® Low loss circuit board Operating Frequency 1710 — 2180 MHz Radome Material Band Performance Note U Outdoor usage http://www.commscope. com/catalog/andrew/product_detaits.aspx?id=15654 1/6/2016 U U m a cu m a� w Mechanical Specifications Y u Color Light gray a� Lightning Protection do Ground Radiator Material Low loss circuit board Radome Material PVC, UV resistant RF Connector Interface 7-16 DIN Female RF Connector Location Bottom http://www.commscope. com/catalog/andrew/product_detaits.aspx?id=15654 1/6/2016 HBXX-6517DS-VTM Page 5 of 7 RF Connector Quantity, 4 total Wind Loading, maximum 668.0 N @ 150 km/h 150.2 IV @ 150 km/h Wind Speed, maximum 241 km/h l 150 mph Dimensions Depth 166.0 mm 1 6.5 in Length 1903.0 mm 1 74.9 in Width 305.0 mm 1 12.0 in Net Weight 19.5 kg 1 43.0 Ib Remote Electrical Tilt (RET) Information Model with Factory HBXX-6517DS-A2M Installed AISG 2.0 Actuator RET System Teletilt@ Packed Dimensions Depth 292.0 mm 1 11.5 in u Length 2219.0 mm 87.4 In a� a� Width 409.0 mm 16.1 In Y V Shipping Weight 29.3 kg j 64.6 Ib a Patterns- Show Regulatory Compliance/Certifications Agency Classification RoHS 2011/65/EU Compliant by Exemption http://www.commscope.com/catalog/andrew/product detaits.aspx?id=15654 1/6/2016 HBXX-65 17DS-VTM China RoHS SJ/T 11364- 2006 ISO 9001:2008 * Included Parts Page 6of7 Above Maximum Concentration Value (MCV) Designed, manufactured and/or distributed under this quality management system 600899A-2 Downtllt Mounting Kit for 2.4 - 4.5 in (60 - 115 mm) OD round members. Kit contains one scissor top bracket set and one bottom bracket set. C0MMSCQ5PE0 � ABOUT US NEWS CENTER SUPPORT Ethics (fAbout-Us/Corporate-Respon(/ABOUT- (1NEWSCENTER) (/SUPPORT/)sibility-and- ' Sustainability/Ethics/) US/WHO-WE— Privacy US/WHO-WE— Privacy (/About-Us/Privacy/) ARE BloQ (/Blog/) Contact Us Cookies (!About-Us/Cookies/') (/Support/) Events Terms (/About-Us/Terms/) Feedback (/feedback) Careers (/About- (/NewsCenter/Events/)Customer 000000 Us/Careers/) Infoaraphics Support Su ort Corporate NewsCenter Info ra ics (http'.11tikr5ryr�(11��1 �ccipe) Partner I oci —'— In the News Us/Corporate- U Partne i s F O 2015 All Rights Reserved. NewsCenter Newsltems Responsibility -and- ocator Sustainability/) Media Contacts Timeline (/About- Us/Who-We- Press Kit Are/Timeline/) NewsCi Investor Relations Press Releases Technical (http: //Ir.com mscoi)e. c6,(NbwsCenter/preSSKeieasea upport Management Team USupport/Technical- About- Su ort Us/Management- Team Training USupport/Tralnina/) http://www.commscope.com/catalog/andrew/product_details.aspx?id=15654 1/6/2016 Monopoles {• 1-800-369-6690 • www.SabreTowersandPoles.com Sabre monopoles are single member self-supporting structures used in urban areas where space is limited. We offer steel tapered monopoles or flanged pipe poles depending on your communication application. All of our poles are custom -engineered to meet your specifications. Sabre's professional staff has a wide range of engineering disciplines and capabilities. Our in-house licensed/regis- tered structural engineers can assure the integrity and re- liability of our products. Holding licenses in all 50 states, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia, our engineering team can certify almost any type of structure. Utilizing industry -accepted software programs, Sabre's engineering team accurately and efficiently performs in-house structural analyses. The latest CAD systems also provide the tools that are needed to prepare permit packages, plot layouts, bills of material and final drawings. Each Sabre monopole comes with complete instruction manuals and erection drawings to ensure easy, accurate assembly and installation. Slip -Sleeve Monopoles Sabre's steel tapered monopoles are designed to carry wireless and microwave communication equipment. Made of high-strength steel with minimum yield strength of 65 ksi, these poles are constructed of slip -sleeve tapered sections. Designed for easy on-site assembly, each order includes steel templates to assure proper base bolt alignment along with complete erection and assembly drawings. Sabre monopoles provide step bolt working rings at handhole levels and loop step bolts at all working points. Available 12, 16 or 18 -sided, our monopoles are custom -engineered to meet your height specifications. All of our steel tapered poles are fabricated and galvanized in our state -of-the-art facilities in Alvarado, Texas. A factory - applied finish coat is available upon request. l•*,�; Flanged Pipe Poles Quality Products Sabre's flanged pipe poles are capable of carrying a Sabre is committed to providing you with quality products variety of communication applications. Internally or at competitive prices. All of our processes and manufac- externally flanged, each order includes steel templates turing procedures are in accordance with AWS, AISC and to assure proper base bolt alignment. Designed with many other nationally recognized standards. To find out safety in mind, Sabre provides step bolt working rings at how Sabre's extensive experience, exceptional quality and handhole levels and loop step bolts at all working points. proven reliability can work for you, contact us toll-free at Sabre's flanged pipe poles are custom engineered to 800-369-6690, via e-mail at sales@sabrecom.com or by fax meet your height specifications. at 712-279-0814. L I'- frrrr '� ., , �.�.MCI0 ifleaep9 2101 Murray Street PO Box 658 Sioux City, IA 51102-0658 Phone 1-712-258-6690 Fax 1-712-279-0814 E-mail salesCNsabrecom.com www. S a breTowe rsa nd Po I e s. to m r — - � Sabre, j -WW Industries, Inc. 5031 Hazel Jones Road Bossier City, LA 71111 Phone 1-318-213-2900 Fax 1-318-213-2919 E-mail info@cellxion.com www.CeliXion.com 2301 Bridgeport Drive PO Box 658 Sioux City, IA 51102-0658 Phone 1-866-428-6937 Fax 1-712.293-1964 E-mail catalogCosabrecom.com www.SabreSiteSolutions.com 555 Enterprise Drive Edmond, OK 73013 Phone 1-405-216-0555 Fax 1-405-216-9555 E-mail info@cellxion,com www,CelIXion.com 7-840-369-6690 • www.SobreTowersandPoles.com y sabre Industries;"' 00 Towers and Poles May 28, 2014 Mr. David McClure Highland Towers 125 W hitestick Road Charleston, WV 25311 RE: Proposed 150' Sabre Monopole and Foundation for Roanoke site, Hollins Rd, Roanoke County, VA. Dear Mr. McClure, Upon receipt of order, we propose to design and supply a 150' monopole and foundation for the above referenced site. The monopole and foundation are to be designed for a basic wind speed of 90 mph with no ice and 30 mph with 3/4" radial ice, Structure Class II, Exposure Category C, Topographic Category 1, in accordance with ANSI/TIA/EIA 222-C, to support the following: Twelve (12) SBNHH-1 D65B panel antennas on a (12) 1-5/8" lines; Twelve (12) SBNHH-1 D65B panel antennas on a (12) 1-5/8" lines; Twelve (12) SBNHH-1 D65B panel antennas on a (12) 1-5/8" lines. 10' 3T -Boom @ 150' CL, with twelve 10' 3T -Boom @ 140' CL, with twelve 10' 3T -Boom CaD 130' CL, with twelve If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. Sincerely, Robert E. Beacom, P.E. Design Engineer ll 2101 Murray Street P.O. Box 658 Sioux City, IA 51102-0650 Phone 712-258-6690 Fax 712-279-0814 mi.SabreTowersandPoles,00m e fff �\VV// IIR!!! � , � � �• Q4 jHollins Road Proposed Tower Site 5119 Hollins R8 � moi= e jo�, Grth , 1 A� E ltPOW d fi ii II Y4b y`0 /% F57 • .�e::� i Ar '' �! 5 � r � 1 i/ ) •�� l .� •'a• h' h9 • Si".� ` • ib. �'�'e,fiG Brd• ..t_• /�y'Ml � • �. / l``'��\' - .r.3•• , •♦ r `p � � �rM1 �� t� ': " ._.� �'.� ;� �.: ,v " 5f 033 a X135 '�k'1�_J``yy�r �.,.. • a � ' n S. •e��'`�a y ,,,�9 t "�: .� + .u, •''Y ti{?t $� �;�t 'ry� � ':f �r�;� .< rte: • • li 1�,� � �; • i�• � � ' � i 1'. A �� - Mr � "r' � , sr �- �, t /f M. Y�9� � 4 •'1-� ti '�. ' � �� r j-'�/r •1 •.�,`,'� • ,r•°• e� .4yY,1_,: .�, - j•tAI 1.CB { ••� �`�• • ••��` 4;` 9 ),•• r;i _• •_ r•:1 d�• -�;� '+rr •�.LJ! � k • • y+ ,y5 � 1J1-��, ��. }�.r—. �• c �" ♦ 4'.`c i 1+ -q'• l6 -c.oi. ` L^• �: , F f/'`s'. �.,-1111! �� Y'••' x� �:, � Y-- '� • I • '1 i y • A T ` �}�vr. r,� a � . i "� L • I 'mss„ � '•'� :.°,,. \ :,�•..• -•.�•r it % •t7 y •i• �' - �` •tg :f' i/.Pry^ f' �� • • ,. ' 0 •,l ;�• �`F' •j• �, \ 2 ♦1r •-v ;' ; � V. 5 1 1r j �, y't,,.. !r• �•� J/ /r' -, P � i;l • •r • `�• • • •• it * ,� 4 `♦"• o° • �rr + �� ! 11 �+3! '� A, 't d°•` • • : I AJC y,�a•• J, r� •jJ Y �• O� �' 1�' •A •y _ - -•.� - I 1 "}% r1�.. % ./ice �,� .� '`��,,"" /, NQ)Elfrres �• .,/� : •��� _Gs.,, ,� r `�� !, �.,, � �`",� , !� � r(Ij r�' f'r irrr� 'C :- t�; . ' ; I �. .ry l: �: , • ':�l f r� rd � �° ,, r. •J�` j � i ��;' ' ,'' f �'�,Ij i � �} f'�I �-- 1 • j� , •. •� � ; >< � ,7 a �631� ' is �' 1 ��` �r 1 I l;r\{ � ,�� •4 �i r,i5 y i�h 4fYl0yj r •�4 r 4 e � { • Z ,� lfr R�{ rt� ,. "Wlr, ! �„ _ � ]A �` F). •.4r.f (' V�. �3hC .� 1�¢Ik�� rA '. r� �r ff,�1i0� 5 ,� �'• Ce . •49 S.. II `� i - r r , r Il # S ! � /r AAl ��.+e�,l, . �¢•,•�ri •. �` .'� yr 173 �, f 1• i{ \iI �cr '� -.+,1 `,.5 � �,.` r'��rr �����1� f"; rr1���Yn3� ���Ir 1�`�, ~ - �f; r� ..1 • win 1f��y �:} ! �/'�� + � '•� i/��'i 51 F�"' S. I i, r �,� -l�1,} � S r 3' •`I ��_ -i' � ( ~ :151 G� � 1 S f Lr�iji �JJ�r[/ � + r� / /fj <..r. � r'+ \! ° �I /1 -; o • � if yi1-lli.(('r Il� Ai. _r �� �� MX' A 1 1 t a I 1�' • 'e(�Ly{ fr �r% yl4fr ril° � }•r�5"I� �+ � 1 r •�._ 9 (O �•t lig, ,ie"Xj� - f, �" 1 .r, fe 'i I r ,! fLUN ji � a .1 , ,�{�_ .�• C- \.{ i r x] , i /. �., . G?r / - fr7F0 ,.p©• ; -� \� I big .X;:s AI � t �.� ,;'.Vi''''i:— ��t �` ��\ '� � id. •� r� '�.1'.�� � � � f�rr�-.� .��� �• �j�. �.- � �,o . � f f`�_=� ''r � 1 Fo�,�- Vii.., :�I}�1� I� ����-„,��r- ;�•`'.'r(' .� �.'�I} r '; 1G �l 'S1J`�f(`� '`� ..� �+, �( l� ' >- •r�g�.li-1--.,;A ,��_y ••s, ;7,_ �y?��� .� ./g'I -7` J �F 1'r - { "'- 1�!' I 1 �"`c,`.` `\' �'.+_:{. •,t” �.«l • j1 y �. ids 5 `3 j a 7 1" c ° is I I'� • ?' ?� f, .i �' f, " • f XW >� a � 5d , i �r t'' ,.r .z ,�i. 1/�� � ,I I 1 1' , • �' `l� b� 1 � 1 �� L�' �� , � '`sll � _ / �'71-t/� ! i' ' •,(� , r'` � r. 4 _ ' S f �+ • f .r e,' , f �•� -J L ✓ i r f i `° �J, DecllnatPon '1�.�p i \\Ulf "A AVE + : �r. : 1 - S ^. Y i v� / I 6 8 e �F Y o ay. -a . 1�604W. r $, r... $rSej � a 8 " j: + i ;I' h i 1 1 —� / !f f �oltI '.. % SCALE 1:24000 `1 til ' ,K� ; ►:` � Ch ' j 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.9 Miles ,��5 fTF � � � � �� ' • �q f _�? ' ,,`r.• 0 1000 Yards MIN 8.61'W 3y'r y t'. 1 I }'_ ' 0 1 Kilometer Name: ROANOKE Location: 037° 19' 44.9000'" N, 0790 55' 32.4800" W Date: 11/12/15 Scale: 1 inch = 2,000 ft. Capprighr 4CF 2009 MyTa a z� z� Pd O � C) a C �? Ln Q" eq Ps � O O now PPM o .MNa a z� z� w .42 z Ln T4 w U3 P=4rr w .42 z Ln T4 w I now Ld O4) A IQ � sn uw I a, 4 i . "P6 w I m � m M -0 ID CL 0 Q CD :3 0 Ct 00 m M Ct rj "I ■ m 9! 016 " c 7� �� ■ • F q r r -. .r MAINNNNNI ■ - ■ —r or - ho w■r. ■ ■ `■ I PF. ■ IN ■ ■ ■ Np � ■ i�{Er ME ■ IN ,� ■ IN � ,' T III ti ■ Via C i7�a�. ll AN . ■ G IN M LO T� CD N � � � T U) (1)_ CO) � � .� � LU � � � 0 � � � 0 � � 0 w - — 2 R � ƒ � :30 0 0 0 k 3 o ®. �■ ; cn he § / /. . o to /■ / )•2 $ [ < f �� ƒ �N2 §_ ) . \ .) 2 ). r / ) «co ! « A.J§}a } A �m ems~ ■ k � • M: > e -� 1�. ; w. <.w . )� \ ( co ;o o § o j . k t m § §CG § S < 2 ` - z. §. - § (z :■ \ ) G toir LL, f A � 0 / _ E w %CL� y \ ; \� ._ Summary of Existing Broadband Tower or other Sites Considered and Rejected Attached you will find two summaries of existing broadband tower sites or other potential structures that were considered during our search to locate an acceptable structure to install wireless antennas to meet the coverage objectives of Verizon Wireless. We actually expanded our search outside the search to make sure we had covered every potential structure. Most of the structures were rejected by Verizon because they were either outside the search ring or we could not obtain the necessary height to achieve the coverage objectives of Verizon and other wireless carriers. The closest potential site considered was the overhead transmission power site owned by AEP and currently used by AT&T. The site was rejected by Verizon because it is too far to the east of the search ring and the transmission structure is at capacity based on discussions with AT&T personnel. In 2014, AT&T upgraded the site with LTE equipment and they were limited to what could be installed due to the structural limitations of the existing transmission tower. The transmission tower would have to be replaced with a bigger, more structurally sound tower to handle a second carrier. Given that we would have to work around the power company equipment and schedules (which can consume more than a year), we have found these types of upgrades or modifications to be cost prohibitive. Therefore, we moved to a more central location that would meet the wireless objectives and be more cost efficient to construct and manage. 91 AntennaSearch - Search for Cell Towers, Cell Reception, Hidden Antennas and more. Page 1 of 1 Fleet GPS Tracking telogis.com/gps-tracking Automated Commercial GPS Tracker Cut fuel & support costs. Free Demo Registered Tower Detail - Tower (1) Ownership Info Registration #: Rep Company: HOLLAND & KNIGHT L.L.P. Address: 2099 PEN NSYLVAN IA AVE. 37.3209 Contact: PETER M CONNOLLY N.W. STE 100 Overall Height: 1257.0 feet Phone: (202)862-5989 WASHINGTON, DC, 20006 Status: Email: pconnollyahklaw.com Date Constructed: 03/0112001 Owner Company: UNITED STATES CELLULAR Attn: Stephanie Terrell CORPORATION Address: 8410 W. BRYN MAWR AVE Contact: Not Recorded STE #700 Phone: (773)399-8900 CHICAGO, IL, 60631 Email: Stephanie.terrellCcouscellular.com awer Characteristics Registration #: 1235949 Ground Elev: 1156.9 feet Latitude: 37.3209 Height Of Structure: 85.0 feet Longitude: -79.9445 Overall Height: 1257.0 feet Structure Type: Building w/Antenna Structure Address: 320 Hershbergsr Road Status: Constructed Roanoke, VA Date Constructed: 03/0112001 sto Purpose status Date Addnllnto New Reg Granted 09/19/2002 --- Constructed Granted 09/19/2002 ® 2004-2009 by General Data Resources, Inc. http://www.antennasearch.comisitestart, asp?sourcepagename=antennacheektowerreview&... 5/30/2014 AntennaSearch - Search for Cell Towers, Cell Reception, Hidden Antennas and more Reducing your fleet's fuel casts by 25-30% is just the beginning Registered Tower Detail - Tower (2) Page I of I vnersnip into 1016377 Ground Elev: 1073.9 feet Rep Company: Crown Caste USA Inc. Address: 2000 Corporate Drive Contact: Monica G Gambino Canonsburg, PA, 15317 Phone: (724)416-2516 Structure Address: 3000 NICHOLAS AVE. Email: MoniCa.GambinoaCrowncasile.com VINTON, VA Owner Company: CROWN CASTLE GT Attn: REGULATORY DEPARTMENT COMPANY LLC Address: 2000 Corporate Drive Contact: Not Recorded Canonsburg, PA, 15317 Phone: (724)416-2000 Email: Monica.GambinoOCrowncastte.com • Tower Characteristics Registration #: 1016377 Ground Elev: 1073.9 feet Latitude: 37.3044 Height Of Structure: 284.8 feet Longitude: -79.9058 Overa€I Height: 1372.8 feet Structure Type: Tower Structure Address: 3000 NICHOLAS AVE. Status: Constructed VINTON, VA Date Constructed: 01/01/1988 Reg Granted fication Granted Update Granted ,r Change Granted Update Granted Update Granted Station Granted tructed _ Granted 0 311 311 9 9 7 0212411998 0211612000 06/18/2000 Assignor Rep Owner 11/28/2001 1111012002 12/13/2002 12/13/2002 m 2004-2009 by General Data Resources, Inc. CROWN CASTLE GT COMPANY LLC Bennet & Bennet, PLLC Crown Castle G7 Company LLC Cell Phone Signal Booster 11> wirelesscoveragesolutions.com Maximize cell phone signal indoors. 100% money -back guaranteed! http://www. antennasearch. comisitestart.asp?sourcepagename=antennachecktowerreview&... 5/30/2014 AntennaSearch - Search for Cell Towers, Cell Reception, Hidden Antennas and more. Page 1 of 2 U.S. Cellular® Phones _.._ -: uscellular.com/NoContract Get Your Phone W/ 4G Speed Today! No Contract Needed. Learn More. Registered Tower Detail - Tower (3) inersmp Into 1244155 Ground Elev: 1355.1 feet Rep Company: Crown Castle Attn: Regulatory Dept. Contact: Christine A Verre Address: 2000 Corporate Drive Phone: (336)643-2524 Canonsburg, PA, 15316 Email: Chdt;tine.Ver(e(MCrowncaslte com Roanoke, VA Owner Company:CCATT LLC Attn: Regulatory Department Contact: Not Recorded Address: 2000 Corporate Drive Phone: (724)416-2000 Canonsburg, PA, 15317 Email: Regulatory. Departrneq!fl E2Aag2g!e.cam Owner Change Tower Characteristics egistration #: 1244155 Ground Elev: 1355.1 feet atitude: 37.3634 Height Of Structure: 109.9 feet Dngitude: -79.9337 Overall Height: 1466.9 feet tructure Type: NA Structure Address: 67 Strawberry Hill Road tatus: Constructed Roanoke, VA ate Constructed: 12/24/2002 07/02/2004 tofy Purpose Status Date AddnIInfo Constructed Granted 07/02/2004 --- New Reg Granted 07/02/2004 Adm Update Granted 09/0212004 --- Owner Change Granted 12122/2004 Rep Cingular Wireless LLC Owner Triton Network SMLLC L.L.C. Owner Change Granted 01/27/2005 Rep LINGULAR WIRELESS LLC Owner NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC dm Update Granted 09/29/2005 Adm Update Granted 1 211 8120 07 dm Update Granted 02/18/2010 --- dm Update Granted 02/19/2010 --- dm Update Granted 05/08/2012 Adm Update Granted 11/25/2012 --- Modification Granted 01/28/2013 --- Constructed Granted 01/28/2013 Owner Change Granted 01/23/2014 Rep Crown Castle Owner CCATT LLC dm Update Granted 02/03/2014 --- dm Update Granted 04/17/2014 --- m 2004-2009 by General Data Resources, Inc, http://www.antennasearch. comisitestart.asp?sourcepagename=antennacheektowerreview&... 5/30/2014 it AntennaSearch - Search for Cell Towers, Cell Reception, Hidden. Antennas and more. Page 1 of 1 Fleet GPS Tracki ng telogis.com/gps-tracking Automated Commercial GPS Tracker Cut fuel & support costs. Free Demo Registered Tower Detail - Tower (4) Ownership Into Registration #: Rep Company: Holland & Knight LLP Address: 2099 Pennsylvania Ave N.W. 37.3189 Contact: Peter M Connolly Ste 100 Overall Height: 1236.9 feet Phone: (202)862-5989 Washington, DC, 20006 Status: Email: pconnolly(8thklaw.com Date Constructed: 0511 8/2 00 4 Owner Company: United States Cellular Attn: Stephanie Terrell Corporation Address: 8410 W. Bryn Mawr Ave. Suite Contact: Not Recorded #700 Phone: (773)399-8900 Chicago, IL, 60631 Email: Not Recorded >wer Characteristics Registration #: 1235935 Ground Elev: 1136.9 feet Latitude: 37.3189 Height Of Structure: 85.0 feet Longitude: -79.9607 Overall Height: 1236.9 feet Structure Type: Tower Structure Address: Town Square Blvd @ Town Status: Constructed Square Mall Date Constructed: 0511 8/2 00 4 Roanoke, VA ory 9) 204-2009 Purpose Status Date Addnllnfo Naw Reg Granted 09/18/2002 Constructed Granted 10/04/2002 --- Constructed Granted 0 711 2120 04 Modification Granted -- 07/12/2004 --- ©2004-2009 by General Dala Resources, Inc. Super ATV AN superatv.com ' Take 5% off your purchase today. Enter takefive at checkout now! http://www.antennasearch. comisitestart.asp?sourcepagename=antennacheektowerreview&... 5/30/2014 �s AntennaSearch - Search for Cell Towers, Cell Reception, Hidden Antennas and more. Page 1 of 2 Commercial GPS Tracker l T telogis.com/gps-tracking Fully automated fleet GPS tracking Cuts Drive Time. Profit, See Demo Registered Tower Detail - Tower (5) vnersn€p InTo 1061849 Ground Eley: 1058.8 feet Latitude: Rep Company: American Towers, LLC. Attn: FAA FCC 1n.'�:. Not Recorded a 10 Presidential Way Phone: (678)265-6730 �4 Woburn, MA, 01801 Email: faa-fccf8lamerican€ower,com T 01/15/2013 Assignor Owner Company: American Towers, LLC Attn: Regulatory Compiance FAA Contact: Not Recorded FCC Phone: (678)265-6730 Address: 10 Presidential Way Email' foa-f(.'c@amedcantow2r.com Woburn, MA, 01801 r vnersn€p InTo 1061849 Ground Eley: 1058.8 feet Latitude: Rep Company: American Towers, LLC. Attn: FAA FCC Contact: Not Recorded Address: 10 Presidential Way Phone: (678)265-6730 ROANOKE, VA Woburn, MA, 01801 Email: faa-fccf8lamerican€ower,com T 01/15/2013 Assignor Owner Company: American Towers, LLC Attn: Regulatory Compiance FAA Contact: Not Recorded FCC Phone: (678)265-6730 Address: 10 Presidential Way Email' foa-f(.'c@amedcantow2r.com Woburn, MA, 01801 • Tower Characteristics Registration #. 1061849 Ground Eley: 1058.8 feet Latitude: 37.3023 Height Of Structuro: 200.1 feet Longitude: -79.9023 Overall Height: 9258.9 feet Structure Type: Tower Structure Address: 1715 Granby Street (085589) Status: Constructed ROANOKE, VA (late Constructed: 09130/2002 Reg Granted .r Change Granted 5cation Granted tructed Granted ;r Change Granted ;r Change Granted Update Granted Update Granted :r Change Granted 03/18/1999 02101/2001 Owner m 2004-2009 by General Data Resources, Inc. Addn€ Info American Towers, Inc. FAA/FCC Compliance Specialist American Tower through TowerSites Monitoring, Inc. American Tower through TGwerSItes Monitoring, Inc. American Towers, Inc. American Towers, Inc. American Towers, Inc. American Towers, LLC American Towers, LLC. http ://www. antennasearch. comisi testart.asp?sourcepagename=antennachecktowerreview&... 5/30/2014 Rep 10/23/2002 10/23/2002 01/28/2003 Owner Rep 08118!2004 Rep Owner 08/14/2009 12/1512011 01/15/2013 Assignor Owner Rep m 2004-2009 by General Data Resources, Inc. Addn€ Info American Towers, Inc. FAA/FCC Compliance Specialist American Tower through TowerSites Monitoring, Inc. American Tower through TGwerSItes Monitoring, Inc. American Towers, Inc. American Towers, Inc. American Towers, Inc. American Towers, LLC American Towers, LLC. http ://www. antennasearch. comisi testart.asp?sourcepagename=antennachecktowerreview&... 5/30/2014 AntennaSearch - Search for Cell Towers, Cell Reception, Hidden Antennas and more. Page 1 of 1 Registered Tower Detail - Tower (6) wnorship Info Owner Company: VIRGINIA PCS ALLIANCE. Attn: JESSICA WILMER L.C. dVa NTELOS Address: 1150 SHENANDOAH VILLAGI Contact: Not Recorded DRIVE Phone: (540)941-3610 WAYNESBORO, VA, 22980 Email: Not Recorded Tower Characteristics registration #: 1249207 Ground Elev: 9089.9 feet atitude: 37.3463 Height Of Structure: 198.8 feet ongitude: -79.9631 Overall Height: 1288.8 feet tructure Type: Tower Structure Address: 7403 BARRENS ROAD latus: Constructed ROANOKE, VA gate Constructed: 0111712005 istory Puose Status Date Addnllnfo NewrpReg Granted 07/08/2005 --- Constructed Granted 07/18/2006 © 2004-2009 by General Data Resources, Inc, http://www. antennasearch.comisitestart,asp?sourcepagename=antennachecktowerreview&... 5/30/2014 I AntennaSearch - Search for Cell Towers, Cell Reception, Hidden Antennas and more. Page 1 of 1 Super ATV _. � superatv.com Take 5% off your purchase today. Enter takefive at checkout now! Registered Tower Detail - Tower (7) • Ownership Info Rep Company: Holland & Knight LLP Address: 2099 Pennsylvania Avenue, Contact: Peter M Connolly Esq N.W., Sui Phone: (202)862-5989 Washington, DC, 20006 Email: pconncllC hkiaw.com 2316.4 feet Owner Company: United States Cellular Address: 8410 W. BRYN MAWR END OF TINKER MOUNTAIN Corporation AVENUE, SUITE 700 Contact: Not Recorded CHICAGO, IL, 60631 Phone: (773)399-8900 DALEVILLE, VA Email: Not Recorded 11/08/2001 Assignor )wer Characteristics Registration #: 1017102 Ground Elev: 2198.3 feet Latitude: 37.3729 Height Of Structure: 107.0 feet Longitude: -79.9275 Overall Height: 2316.4 feet Structure Type: Tower Structure Address: END OF TINKER MOUNTAIN Status: Constructed 3.2 MI SSW Date Constructed: 06/01/1992 --- DALEVILLE, VA History Purpose Status Date AddnI into New Reg Granted 03/24/1997 --- Modification Granted 03/19/2000 --- Constructed Granted 03/19/2000 --- Owner Change Granted 11/08/2001 Assignor OHIO STATE CELLULAR PHONE COMPANY, INC. Owner United States Cellular Corporation Rep Holland & Knight LLP C) 2004-2009 by General Data Resources, Inc. Cellular Tower Lease? o steelintheair.com Approached For A Cell Tower? Find Out What A Fair !_ease Rate Is. http://www.antennasearch.comisitestart.asp?sourcepagename=antennacheektowerreview&... 5/30/2014 AntennaSearch - Search for Cell Towers, Cell Reception, Hidden Antennas and more. Page 1 of 2 Registered Tower Detail -Tower (12) • ov vnersmp Info 1007209 Ground Elev: 2208.1 feet Rep Company: Crown Castle USA Inc. Address: 2000 Corporate Drive Contact: Monica G Gambino Canonsburg, PA, 15317 Phone: (724)416-2516 Structure Address: RT 1 BOX 273 Email: Monica.GambinofritCrowncastle,om -Attn: TROUTVILLE, VA Owner Company: CROWN CASTLE GT REGULATORY DEPARTMENT --- COMPANY LLC Address: 2000 Corporate Drive Contact: Not Recorded Canonsburg, PA, 15317 Phone: (724)416-2000 Granted Email: Montca.GambinoCdlCrowncastte.com Tower Characteristics Registration It: 1007209 Ground Elev: 2208.1 feet Latitude: 37.3737 Height Of Structure: 145.0 feet Longitude: -79.9258 Overall Height: 2361-0 feet Structure Type: Tower Structure Address: RT 1 BOX 273 Status: Constructed TROUTVILLE, VA Date Constructed: 01/01/1988 10/07/1997 tory Purpose Status Date AddnlInfo New Reg Granted 11/08/1996 Modification Granted 10/07/1997 --- dm Update Granted 02/22/2000 --- Owner Change Granted 06/1512000 Assignor CROWN CASTLE GT COMPANY LLC Owner Crown Castle GT Company LLC Rep Bennet & Bennet, PLLC dm Update Granted 11/28/2001 --- dm Update Granted 11/10/2002 --- Modification Granted 09/03/2003 --- Constructed Granted 09/04/2003 --- Modification Granted 02/25/2004 --- Constructed Granted 02/26/2004 © 2004-2609 by General Data Resources, Inc. http://www. antennasearch. comisitestart, asp?sourcepagename=antennachecktowerlreview& ... 5/30/2014 AntennaSearch - Search for Cell Towers, Cell Reception, Hidden Antennas and more. Page 1 of 1 U.S. Cellular® Business 1> -k- uscelIular.com/SmaIIBusiness Create Your Better Business Package On Our Nationwide Network. Registered Tower Detail - Tower (14) • ov vnersntp into 1239996 Ground Elev: 2190.4 feet Rep Company: Virginia PCS Alliance, L.C. Address: 1150 Shenandoah Village Drive Longitude: d/b/a NTELOS Waynesboro, VA, 22980 Contact: Daniel J Meenan Structure Address: Tinker Mountain Phone: (540)946-1890 Daleville, VA Email: meenancIntelos.com Owner Company: Virginia PCS Atliance, L.C. Attn: RN 102 Tinker Mountain d/b/a NTELOS Address: 1150 Shenandoah Village Driv Contact: Not Recorded Waynesboro, VA, 22980 Phone: (540)946-1890 Email: meenandAntelos.com • Tower Characteristics Registration #: 1239996 Ground Elev: 2190.4 feet Latitude: 37.3739 Height Of Structure: 174.9 feet Longitude: -79.9264 Overall Height: 2365.3 feet Structure Type: Tower Structure Address: Tinker Mountain Status: Constructed Daleville, VA Date Constructed: 01/01/1997 story Purpose Status bate AddnlInfo New Reg Granted 08/24/2003 --- Constructed Granted 10/26/2012 --- B 2004-2009 by General Data Resources, Inc. http://www,antennasearch.comisitestart.asp?sourcepagename=antennachecktowerreview&... 5/30/2014 AntennaSearch - Search for Cell Towers, Cell Reception, Hidden Antennas and more. Page 1 of 1 Tower Detail (Not Registered) -Tower (10) lwnership Info Owner Company: AT&T MOBILITY - NE Address: Not Recorded Contact: Not Recorded Phone: Not Recorded Ismail: Not Recorded • Structure Characteristics riling #: 2008 -AEA -2596 -OE Ground Elev: 4121.1 feet .atitude: 37.314 Height Of Structure: 78.1 feet .ongitude: -79.961 Overall Height: 1199.2 feet Structure Type: Tall Structure Structure Address: Not Recorded Status: Unknown )ate Filed: 0 611 2/2 00 8 � � 0 2004-2009 by General Data Resources, loc. iem http://www.antennasearch.comisitestart.asp?sourcepagename=antennachecktowerreview&.., 5/30/2014 AntennaSearch - Search for Cell Towers, Cell Reception, Hidden Antennas and more. Page l of l Tower Detail (Not Registered) - Tower (43) Mnership Info Owner Company: GTE WIRELESS OF THE Address: Not Recorded SOLITHINCORP Contact: Not Recorded Phone: Not Recorded Email: Not Recorded • Structure Characteristics --fling #: 00 -AEA -1556 -OE Ground Elev: 1059.1 feet .atitude: 37.333 Height Of Structure: 115.2 feet .ongitude: -79.863 Overall Height: 1173.9 feet structure Type: Tall Structure Structure Address: Not Recorded status: Unknown )ate Filed: 06/01/2000 O 2004-2009 by General Data Resources, Inc, Fleet GPS Tracking telogis.com/gps-tracking Automated Commercial GPS Tracker Cut fuel & support costs. Free Demo http://www. antennasearch. comisitestart. asp?sourcepagename=antennacheektowerreview&... 5/30/2014 AntennaSearch - Search for Cell Towers, Cell Reception, Hidden Antennas and more. Page 1 of 1 Super ATV AN superatv.com Take 5% off your purchase today. Enter takefive at checkout now! Tower Detail (Not Registered) - Tower (8) • Ownership Info Owner Company: AMERICAN TOWER - Address: Not Recorded BOSTON Contact: Not Recorded Phone: Not Recorded Email: Not Recorded • Structure Characteristics =icing #: 2005 -AEA -2442 -OE Ground Elev: 1004.0 feet .atitude: 37.295 Height Of Structure: 107.0 feet -ongitude: -79.937 Overall Height: 1110.9 feet Structure Type: Tall Structure Structure Address: Not Recorded Status: Unknown late Filed: 0712112005 ® 2044-2009 by General Data Resources, Inc. http:llwww. antermasearch. com/sitestart. asp?sourcepagename=antennachecktowerreview&... 5/30/2014 AntennaSearch - Search for Cell Towers, Cell Reception, Hidden Antennas and more { IA"� Page 1 of 2 • Tower Structures - (6236 Hollins Rd, Roanoke, VA 24019) 210 r `+ �u,hyz�.r of W MALT p 852 e 7711 r I symanlnwae P C.InvrirriµlF " 31) - sfollmr 460 �115� � 21fY j (loaT A.. s r v fie' Blur Ridge p Vlnrnn Tower(Registered) Tower(Not°Registered) High structures (typically 1 Medium structures (100 over 200 ft in height) to 200 It in sleight) JSarkway sa ?'` strmir4r EWa1h1n1 (1629 Future Tower ` Future site for registered tower ±' Alert? 60 Towers (17 Registered,43 Not Registered) found within 4.00 miles of 5235 Hollins Rd, Roanoke, VA 24019. Infol The NEAREST Tower is .12 miles away and is owned by County Of Roanoke, Va. V Alert! 2 New Tower Applications found within 4.00 miles of 5235 Hollins Rd, Roanoke, VA 24019. - ype --- -- _ --. Tower T e It) Num __ .. - __,.... .._ Site Owner Height t)isr ARegistered (1) UrMed States Cellular QqrpQrgon 100 feet 1.24 miles (2) Crown Castle GI Company iiC 299 feet 2-07 miles (3) Cc -aft Llc 112 feel 2 12 miles (4) United States Cellular Corporation 100 feet 2.23 miles (5) American Towers. Lic 200 feel 2.32 miles (6) Virginma PGs Alllanoe. L.c. Dba Ntelos 199 feet 2-48 miles (7) United States Cellular Corporation 118 feet 2.67 miles (8) CansAaar Radio Operali[jq Q MpA 99 feet 2.69 miles (9) Positive Alternative Radio Inc 38 feet 2.69 miles f 101 120 feet 2.68 miles (11) Western Vtrrlinia Ernefoancy Medica 170 feet 2.71 miles Services Counoil Inc (12) Crown CesHe Qt Company Lic 153 feet 2.72 miles http://www.antennasearch.conilsitestart.asp?sourcepagename=reportviewer2&prevsessi oni... 5/19/2014 AntennaSearch - Search for Cell Towers, Cell Reception, Hidden Antennas and more TNot Registered (13) Vertical -spaces Lie 199 feet 2.73 miles (14) Vrr inra Pcs AllianceL.c. Me Nteias 175 feet 2.73 miles (15) Uniled States Cellular Corporation 140 fleet 2.87 miles (16) United States Cellular Corporation 150 feet 3.00 miles (17) Perception Media, Inc- 236 feet 3.95 miles (1) R9bert A Bednarek 406 feet .75 miles (2) Brown. Susan [? 80 feet 1.45 miles (3) Heart Of Virginia Broadcasting 75 feet 1.83 miles (4) Contel Cellular, Inc. 299 feet 2-09 miles (5) Contei Cellular 298 feet 2.10 miles (6) Dominion Bankshares 9;orporat,on 50 feet 2.11 miles (7) &Ovanced Auto 26 feet 2.16 miles (8)American Tower- Boston 107 feet 2.21 miles (9) Durninion Bankshares Corvoration 125 feet 2,28 miles (10) AW Mobility - Ne 78 feet 2.33 miles (11) CtW Wreless 150 feet 2,35 miles (12) Grown Communication 199 feel 2.39 miles (13) Crown Cast 199 feel 2.52 miles (14) United States Qellulpr Company 40 feet 2.54 miles (15) Fedex Express 71 feet 2.61 miles (16) The $hockey Precast Group 130 feet 2.70 miles (17) Roanoke Redonal Airport Commis 80 feet 2-71 miles (18) Roanoke City Schools 26 feet 2.72 miles (19) Commutaif Ma United Express 45 feet 2.76 miles (20) Norfolk Southern Reilay Company 40 feet 2.77 mites (21) .r. .w.in . 316 feet 2-78 miles (22) Piedmont Hawthorne Aviation 41 feet 2.83 miles (23) City Of Roanoke, Ve 39 feet 2 84 miles (24) Bunk 61 feet 2.85 miles (25) Petefe V. Gureckis 316 feet 2.90 miles (26) RQanQke Regional Airport Commin40 feet 3.02 miles (27) Verizon Wr I 60 feet 3.02 miles (28) Roanoke Redone) Nwri CQmrnission1176 feet 3.05 miles (29) Grgat Csitstal Express Int 25 feet 3.17 miles (30) T-mobfie tJsa fnc 65 feet 3 18 miles (31) American Towers Coro 270 feet 3.19 miles (32) Triton Ptssunoom 110 feet 3.32 miles (33) Crown Castle 157 feet 3.39 miles (34) Wdbi Television Inr 105 feel 3.60 miles (35) Century Roanoke Cellular 107 feel 3.72 miles (36) Dominion Bankshareg Borporation 260 feet 3.77 miles (37) Y+ Mlinig COMmonwealth Of P.O.I. 66 feet 3.77 miles (38) 168 feel 3.63 miles (39) Pegasus Tower Cpmpeny, LI t 199 feel 3.85 miles (40) Gte Wireless Of The South Inc 28 feet 3.90 miles (41) Devon -Mobile Communications Lp 83 feet 3.93 miles (42) Al t -nr 140 feet 3.96 miles (43) Gte Wreless Of The South incorp 115 feet 3.99 miles Future (1) County Of Roanoke, Va 100 feet 12 miles (2) Beacon jetnns 170 feet _ 3,95 miles by General Data Resources, Mc. Page 2 of 2 http://www.antennasearch.com/sitestaii.asp?sourcepagename=reportviewer2&prevsessioni... 5/19/2014 1214/2015 AntennaSearch - Search for Cell Towers, Cell Reception, Hidden Antennas and more. E' Never Lose Your Keuj�ys Again Only $25 . Tower Structures - (5235 Hollins Rd, Roanoke, VA 24019) .L Cs) Blue ffa Tl.aymentown Woverd'aie AUT CVT 1) ikr) CT)l Webster Hollins B4?rraCi{ - T ^/ uT ��`') bsi Slue t-lidge Park oy Vintan Gog�' _ _ Map i Report a map error Tower(Registered) Tower(Not-Registered) Future Tower * High structures (typically r * Medium structures (100 * Future site for registered over 200 ft in heighq _ to 200 ft in height) - tower httpalwww.antennasear ch.com/ JI Alert! 76 Towers (17 Registered,59 Not Registered) found within 4.00 miles of 5235 Hollins Rd, Roanoke, VA 24019, Info! The NEAREST Tower is .09 miles away and is owned by Highland Towers, Llc. Alert! 2 New Tower Applications found within 4.00 miles of 5235 Hollins Rd, Roanoke, VA 24019. i cn:.,�r = �, E.::� :: i.•. , 3: ;5130- 13:`.'f1CP ii8[csf!f Ili'.; II Registered (1) United States Cellular Corporation 100 feet 1.24 miles (2) Crown Castle Gt Company Lle 299 feet 2.07 miles (3) Ccatl Llc 112 feet 2.12 miles (4) United States Cellular Corporation 100 feet 2.23 miles (5) American Towers, Llc 200 feet 2.32 miles (6) Virginia Pcs Alliance. L.c. Dba Ntelos 199 feet 2.48 miles (7) United States Cellular Corporation 118 feet 2.67 miles (8) Capstar Radio Operating Company 99 feet 2.69 miles (9) Positive Alternative Radio Inc. 38 feet 2.69 miles (10) 120 feet 2.68 miles (11) Western Virginia Emergency Medical 170 feet 2.71 miles. Services Council, Inc. ;itestart.asp?sourcepagename=reportvi ewer2&prevsessionidnum =479355801 &prevordernum= l &previ temnum=1 §ionnam. 113 1214/2015 AntennaSearch - Search for Cell Towers, Cell Reception, Hidden Antennas and more (12) Crown Castle Gt Company Llc 153 feet 2.72 miles (13) Vertical -spaces. LI c 199 feet 2.73 miles (14) Virginia Pes Alliance, L.c. Dba Ntelos 175 feet 2.73 miles (15) United States Cellular Corporation 140 feet 2.87 miles (16) United States Cellular Corporation 150 feet 3.00 miles (17) Perception Media, Inc. 236 feet 3.95 miles Not Registered (1) Highland Towers, Llo 154 feet 09 miles (2) Apex Towers, Llc 154 feet .09 miles (3) Norfolk Southern Railway Company 63 feet .44 miles (4) Robert A. Bednarek 406 feet .75 miles (5) Cellco Partnership 199 feet 1.02 miles (6) Brown, Susan D 80 feet 1.45 miles (7) Norfolk Southern Railway Company 63 feet 4.78 miles (8) Heart Of Virginia Broadcastinq 75 feet 1.83 miles (9) Contel Cellular Inc. 299 feet 2.09 miles (10) Abundant Grace Outreach Ministries Inc. 100 feet 2.10 miles (11) Centel Cellular 298 feet 2.10 miles (12) Dominion Bankshares Corporation 50 feet 2.11 miles (13) Advanced Auto 26 feet 2.16 miles (14) American Tower - Boston 107 feet 2.21 miles (15) Dominion Bankshares Corporation 125 feet 2.28 miles (16) At&t Mobility- Ne 78 feet 2.33 miles (17) Cfw Wireless 150 feet 2.35 miles (18) Crown Communication 199 feet 2.39 miles (19) Crown Castle 199 feet 2.52 miles (20) United States Cellular Company 40 feet 2.54 miles (21) Fedex Express 71 feet 2.61 miles (22) The Shockey Precast Group 130 feet 2.70 miles (23) Roanoke Regional Airport Comm iss 80 feet 2.71 mites (24) Roanoke City Schools 26 feet 2,72 miles (25) Commutair Dba United Express 45 feet 2.76 miles (26) Norfolk Southern Railway Company 63 feet 2.78 miles (27) G.r.o.w.inc. 316 feet 2.78 miles (28) Roanoke Regional Airport Commission 75 feet 2.80 miles (29) Federal Aviation Administration 165 feet 2.81 miles (30) Piedmont Hawthorne Aviation 41 feet 2.83 miles (31) City Of Roanoke, Va 39 feet 2.84 miles (32) Blank 61 feet 2.85 miles (33) Roanoke Regional Airport Commission 25 feet 2.88 miles (34) Petere V. Gureckis 316 feet 2.90 miles (35) Roanoke Regional Airport Commission 25 feet 2.95 miles (36) Roanoke Regional Airport Commiss 40 feet 3.02 miles (37) Verizon Wireless 60 feet 3.02 miles (38) Roanoke Regional Airport Commission 1176 feet 3.05 miles (39) Norfolk Southern Railway Company 63 feet 3.16 miles (40) Great Coastal Express Inc 25 feet 3.17 miles (41) T -mobile Usa Inc 65 feet 3.18 miles (42) American Towers Corp 270 feet 3.19 miles (43) Morgan Ventures, Llc 199 feet 3.22 miles (44) Norfolk Southern Railway Company 63 feet 3.25 miles (45) Norfolk Southern Railway Company 63 feet 3.29 miles (46) Triton Pcssuncom 110 feet 3.32 miles (47) Crown Castle 157 feet 3,39 miles . (48) Wdbi Television Inc 105 feet 3.60 miles (49) _Norfolk Southern Railway Company 63 feet 3.61 miles (50) Century Roanoke Cellular 107 feet 3.72 miles (51) Norfolk Southern Railway Company 63 feet 3.74 miles (52) Dominion Bankshares Corporation 260 feet 3.77 miles (53) Virginia Commonwealth Of D.o.t. 66 feet 3.77 miles (54) 168 feet 3.83 miles (55) Pegasus Tower Company, Llc 199 feet 3.85 miles (56) Gte Wireless Of The South Inc 28 feet 3.90 miles (57) Devon Mobile Communications Lp 83 feet 3.93 miles (58) At&t -nrec 140 feet 3.96 miles (59) Gle Wireless Of The South Inooro 115 feet 3.99 miles Future (1) County Of Roanoke, Va 100 feet .12 miles (2) Beacon Towers 170 feet 3.95 miles O 2004-2009 by General Data Resources, Inc, http:ltwww.antennasearch.com/sitestart.asp?soureopagenatne=reWtviewer2&prevsessionidnum=479355801&prevordernum=1&previtem num=1 §ionnam... 2I3 a W W IL 2 O U W H Q a R L! r_ ai q O c a o c U O a) R 3 0 D O }' u L O CL 0 a a O �^ G! C E a r E c c 3 ;M a413 4 L � 3 L � O R R 0 0 V) V) 'Z *z 75- C t E a E 4- O O C f]A O C �+ U O a L R -0 U C R CL Q m 3 o 0 L o E C :3 O � C E 15 L � O C � L 3 O a O Q O a CL R CL o U1 N R a R O a c s a +1 V R a Q•] R O 4- 0 I a `0 4 7 a m L R O 4 ,6 a •� C (L) O M u R '^ W41 R a a 7 R +' L R W L O ,2 U u +o tE a u ate+ G1 CL a 0 GD O' C R +� E R R a c tA W CL t � 3 m O L to R f+ R U 0 .= R CL M O Q} 0 Ln -a o a N a 4D � C O 41 ro Ou -a as Ui U a tt1 CL C 4A C W u o � M m nn � c as TS E 3 v � �i O a }' v 7 t!0 L � h a 1 L a G O CL 0 O - Q � U cli O R t ,n O. M U + a) CL o � R R C C CU O C +1 Co L R as o 41 a m a u 'n U •� R 4 C a as O o L L CL Q Commitment Number: Customer Reference: FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE "A" 19917728 Hollins Road 2 Inquiries Should Be Directed To 1. Policy or Policies to be issued: Effective Date of Commitment: December 20, 2014 @ 8:00 am Prepared For: Highland Towers, LLC Fidelity National Title Insurance Company 7130 Glen Forest Drive, Suite 300 Richmond, VA 23226 Toll -Free phone: 866-552-0129 A. ALTA OWNERS POLICY 2006 Amount: $0.00 Proposed INSURED: Highland Towers, LLC B. ALTA LOAN POLICY 2006 Amount: $0.00 Proposed INSURED: 2. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in the Commitment and covered herein is Leasehold Estate. 3. Title to said estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in: William H. Mistele, Trustee under Declaration of Trust dated February 25, 1971 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of Roanoke, State of Virginia, and is described as follows: See Exhibit "A" Attached Countersigned: By: Authorized Signatory Valid only If Schedule B and Cover Are Attached CLSS-Commitment Commitment No. 19917728 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B - SECTION I The following are the requirements to be complied with: Pay the agreed amounts for the interest(s) The Company must be furnished proof of payment of all real property taxes and assessments that are due and payable. Type of Tax: County For the period: In the amount of: Tax parcel ID #: Paid through: Total Assessment: 2014 $4,571.46 annually 39.09-01-07.0000 2014 $419,400.00 Any tax delinquencies noted above must be paid at closing. 2. All current owners of the property must execute and deliver to the Company its OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT AND AGREEMENT or OWNER'S DE=CLARATION (as attached). This is to be completed by the record owner and submitted with the closing documents. The Company reserves the right to add additional items or make further requirements after review of the requested Affidavit/Declaration. 3. Pay the agreed amounts for the interest(s) to be insured, and pay us the premiums, fees and charges for the policy.to be insured, and pay us the premiums, fees and charges for the policy. 4. Instrument(s) satisfactory to create the estate or interest to be insured must be properly executed (see Document(s) Requirement Note below), delivered and duly filed for record, including any Recorder of Deeds' or Clerks' required Cover Sheets, Affidavits or Forms: A. Memorandum of Lease from William H. Mistele, Trustee under Declaration of Trust dated February 25, 1971 to Highland Towers, LLC. Each document submitted for recording must be executed before an FNF approved Notary for acknowledgement. Properly completed and executed attached Affidavit of Notary will be sufficient evidence of compliance with FNF approved Notary requirement. Each document involving an entity as a party, must include a statement of the state of formation for the entity and must correctly recite any mergers, name changes, fictitious names or erroneous names appearing in the title to clarify the record. Each document received by this office for recording must be dated and executed no more than five (5) days before we receive it. In some cases a document received by our office more than five (5) days after execution, may be subject to fines or additional fees imposed by the Clerk's office. FNF-CLSS is not responsible for payment or fronting of any fine or fee for tardy submission of a document and we may hold such document until we receive funds sufficient to cover the cost of recording plus the fine or fee. Commitment No. 19917728 SCHEDULE B - SECTION I Continued 5. For William H. Mistele, Trustee under Declaration of Trust dated February 25, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as Trust): A. The Company must be provided with evidence that the Trustees have full and complete power and authority to sell described property pursuant to and in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Trust Agreement under which title is held and vested and further that all provisions of the Trust have been complied with concerning the transaction and there is no violation of any of the provisions thereof. B. In order to satisfy our requirements we require a current copy of Trust Agreement(s) and all amendments, or a current Certification of Trustees) pre -approved by Company. 6. For Highland Towers, LLC (hereinafter referred to as LLC): A. The Company must be provided with a copy of a. the Articles of Organization, b. written Operating Agreement and all amendments thereto, C. current membership roster, and d. a certificate of good standing (or current registration) of LLC. B. Unless the deed, mortgage/Deed of Trust and/or other encumbrance instrument(s) is/are executed by all Members, the Company must be furnished a Resolution of all Members of the LLC approving the transaction and ratifying and confirming action taken or to be taken by the Manager(s) or Managing Member(s). C. In lieu of A and B above, certification by LLC's attorney that LLC is a valid and subsisting limited liability company in its state of organization and that execution and delivery of the deed, mortgage/Deed of Trust and/or other encumbrance instrument(s) is/are pursuant to the terms of its operating agreement. D. Execution of any recordable document (also any Company affidavit, cover sheet, or other executed document), must include proper state of formation; and, if applicable, correctly reflect any mergers, name changes, erroneous names used or variations in title. NOTE: In the event the Commitment Jacket is not attached hereto, all of the terms, conditions and provisions contained in said Jacket are incorporated herein. If Commitment Jacket was inadvertently omitted it will be provided upon request. (END OF SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1) Commitment No. 19917728 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B - SECTION II Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 2. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. 6. Taxes and special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. 7. Taxes for the year 2015 and subsequent years, a lien not yet due and payable. 8. Terms, provisions, covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations, easements, charges, assessments and liens provided in a Deed recorded in Deed Book 1065, Page 675, but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of income, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law. 9. Easement in favor of The Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Virginia, set forth in instrument recorded on 02/06/1978 in Deed Book 1085, Page 345. 10. Easement in favor of Appalachian Power Company, a Virginia corporation, set forth in instrument recorded on 08/26/1987 in Deed Book 1270, Page 01861. 11. Terms, provisions, covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations, easements, charges, assessments and liens provided in a Deed or Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions recorded in Instrument No. 200313233, but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of income, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law. 12. Easement Agreement in favor of Western Virginia Water Authority, set forth in instrument recorded on 04/03/2006 in Instrument No. 200604953. Commitment No. 19917728 SCHEDULE B - SECTION II Continued 13. Terms and conditions of Memorandum of Option and Lease Agreement dated 08/01/2014 by and between Mistele Declaration of Trust, William H. Mistele, Trustee, and Highland Towers, LLC, a West Virginia limited liability company, recorded on 08/14/2014 in Instrument No. 201407364. END OF EXCEPTIONS (END OF SCHEDULE B - SECTION 11) EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description An interest in land, said interest being over a portion of the following described parent parcel: BEGINNING at a point located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Hollins Road (Virginia Secondary Route No. 601) and Carlos Drive, N.E. (Virginia Secondary Route No. 616) as shown on the hereinafter referred to plat; thence along with southerly side of Carlos Drive, S. 81' 50' 45" E. 70.64 feet to a point; thence continuing with Carlos Drive and with a curved line to the right having a radius of 469.70 feet and whose chord bearing and distance is S. 76' 04' 28" E. 94.47 feet, an arc distance of 94.63 feet to a point; thence continuing with Carlos Drive, S. 700 18' 11" E. 169.50 feet to a point; thence continuing with Carlos Drive, S. 720 03' 13" E. 100.38 feet to a point; thence continuing with Carlos Drive and with a curved line to the left having a radius of 377.33 feet and whose chord bearing and distance is S. 80° 09' 33" E. 106.40 feet, an arc distance of 106.76 feet to a point corner to the Norfolk and Western Railway right-of-way; thence leaving Carlos Drive and with the Norfolk and Western Railway right-of-way, S. 16'45' 24" W. 124.84 feet to a point; thence continuing with the Norfolk and Western Railway right-of-way and with Hinman, S. 320 25' W. 459.52 feet to a point, corner to John T. Montcastle and Ralph G. Hancock; thence leaving Hinman and with Montcastle and Hancock, N. 83° 49' 35" W. 306.90 feet to a point on the easterly side of Hollins Road; thence leaving Montcastle and Hancock and with the easterly side of Hollins Road, N. 6° 10' 25" E. 616.83 feet to the place of BEGINNING, and containing 5.85 acres more or less, as shown on a plat of survey dated April 28, 1977, made by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, P.C., Certified Land Surveyors, a copy of which is recorded in Deed Book 1065, Page 678. LESS AND EXCEPT that portion of property conveyed to Commonwealth of Virginia from William H. Mistele, declaration of trust dated February 25, 1971 by General Warranty Deed dated May 05, 2003 and recorded June 05, 2003 in Instrument No. 200313233. AND BEING a portion of the same property conveyed to William H. Mistele, Trustee under Declaration of Trust dated February 25, 1971 from William H. Mistele and Jeannette G. Mistele, Trustee under Declaration of Trust date November 21, 1981 by Deed of Correction dated March 30, 2006 and recorded March 30, 2006 in Instrument No. 200604785. Tax Parcel No. 39.09-01-07.0000 Said interest being over land more particularly described by the following description: Insert metes and bounds description of area ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THIS INFORMATION IS PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE AND COURTESY AND IS NOT CONSIDERED TO BE PART OF THE TITLE PRODUCT. The following real estate tax information is deemed reliable and is provided for informational purposes only. Real Estate Tax Type: County Taxes are Paid: Annually Due Date(s): Tax Authority Name: Phone: 540-772-2056 Additional notes regarding taxes, documents and/or special recordation requirements: CSA coversheet is required to record all documents. Go to<https://csa.landsystems.com/csa> to obtain login if not using our office to record the documents. File No.: 19997728 CLSS-Additional Info Addendum FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, PRIVACY NOTICE Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its majority-owned subsidiary companies providing real estate- and loan -related services (collectively, "FNF", "our" or "we") respect and are committed to protecting your privacy. This Privacy Notice lets you know how and for what purposes your Personal Information (as defined herein) is being collected, processed and used by FNF. We pledge that we will take reasonable steps to ensure that your Personal Information will only be used in ways that are in compliance with this Privacy Notice. The provision of this Privacy Notice to you does not create any express or implied relationship, or create any express or implied duty or other obligation, between Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and you. See also No Representations or Warranties below. This Privacy Notice is only in effect for any generic information and Personal Information collected and/or owned by FNF, including collection through any FNF website and any online features, services and/or programs offered by FNF (collectively, the "Website"). This Privacy Notice is not applicable to any other web pages, mobile applications, social media sites, email lists, generic information or Personal Information collected and/or owned by any entity other than FNF. How Information is Collected The types of personal information FNF collects may include, among other things (collectively, "Personal Information"): (1) contact information (e.g., name, address, phone number, email address); (2) demographic information (e.g., date of birth, gender marital status); (3) Internet protocol (or IP) address or device ID/LJDID; (4) social security number (SSN), student ID (SIN), driver's license, passport, and other government ID numbers; (5) financial account information; and (6) information related to offenses or criminal convictions. In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from the following sources: • Applications or other forms we receive from you or your authorized representative; • Information we receive from you through the Website; • Information about your transactions with or services performed by us, our affiliates, or others; and • From consumer or other reporting agencies and public records maintained by governmental entities that we either obtain directly from those entities, or from our affiliates or others. Additional Ways Information is Collected Throu2b the Website Browser Log Files. Our servers automatically log each visitor to the Website and collect and record certain information about each visitor. This information may include IP address, browser language, browser type, operating system, domain names, browsing history (including time spent at a domain, time and date of your visit), referring/exit web pages and URLs, and number of clicks. The domain name and IP address reveal nothing personal about the user other than the IP address from which the user has accessed the Website. Cookies. From time to time, FNF or other third parties may send a "cookie" to your computer. A cookie is a small piece of data that is sent to your Internet browser from a web server and stored on your computer's hard drive and that can be re -sent to the serving website on subsequent visits. A cookie, by itself, cannot read other data from your hard disk or read other cookie files already on your computer. A cookie, by itself, does not damage your system. We, our advertisers and other third parties may use cookies to identify and keep track of, among other things, those areas of the Website and third party websites that you have visited in the past in order to enhance your next visit to the Privacy Notice Effective: January 6, 2015 Websitc. You can choose whether or not to accept cookies by changing the settings of your Internet browser, but some functionality of the Website may be impaired or not function as intended. See the Third Party Opt Out section below. Web Beacons. Some of our web pages and electronic communications may contain images, which may or may not be visible to you, known as Web Beacons (sometimes referred to as "clear gifs"). Web Beacons collect only limited information that includes a cookie number; time and date of a page view; and a description of the page on which the Web Beacon resides. We may also carry Web Beacons placed by third party advertisers. These Web Beacons do not carry any Personal Information and are only used to track usage of the Website and activities associated with the Website. See the Third Party Opt Out section below. Unique Identifier. We may assign you a unique internal identifier to help keep track of your future visits. We may use this information to gather aggregate demographic information about our visitors, and we may use it to personalize the information you see on the Website and some of the electronic communications you receive from us. We keep this information for our internal use, and this information is not shared with others. Third Party Opt Out. Although we do not presently, in the future we may allow third -party companies to serve advertisements and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit the Website. These companies may use non -personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to the Website in order to provide advertisements about products and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party Web Beacon to collect this information, as further described above. Through these technologies, the third party may have access to and use non -personalized information about your online usage activity. You can apt -out of certain online behavioral services through any one of the ways described below. After you opt -out, you may continue to receive advertisements, but those advertisements will no longer be as relevant to you. • You can opt -out via the Network Advertising Initiative industry opt-outat http:/Iwww.networkadvertising.org. • You can opt -out via the Consumer Choice Page at http://ww%v.aboutads.info. • For those in the U.K,, you can opt -out via the IAB UK's industry apt-outat http://www.youronlinechoices.com. • You can configure your web browser (Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer, Safari, etc.) to delete and/or control the use of cookies. More information can be found in the Help system of your browser. Note: If you opt -out as described above, you should not delete your cookies. If you delete your cookies, you will need to opt -out again, Use of Personal Information Information collected by FNF is used for three main purposes: • To provide products and services to you or one or more third party service providers (collectively, "Third Parties") who are obtaining services on your behalf or in connection with a transaction involving you. • To improve our products and services that we perform for you or for Third Parties. • To communicate with you and to inform you about FNF's, FNF's affiliates and third parties' products and services. When Information Is Disclosed By. FNF We may provide your Personal Information (excluding information we receive from consumer or other credit reporting agencies) to various individuals and companies, as permitted by law, without obtaining your prior authorization. Such laws do not allow consumers to restrict these disclosures, Disclosures may include, without limitation, the following: • To agents, brokers, representatives, or others to provide you with services you have requested, and to enable us to detect or prevent criminal activity, fraud, material misrepresentation, or nondisclosure in connection with an insurance transaction; • To third -party contractors or service providers who provide services or perform marketing services or other functions on our behalf; • To law enforcement or other governmental authority in connection with an investigation, or civil or criminal subpoenas or court orders; and/or • To lenders, lien holders, judgment creditors, or other parties claiming an encumbrance or an interest in title whose claim or interest must be determined, settled, paid or released prior to a title or escrow closing. In addition to the other times when we might disclose information about you, we might also disclose information when required by law or in the good -faith belief that such disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with a legal process or applicable laws; (2) enforce this Privacy Notice; (3) respond to claims that any materials, documents, images, graphics, logos, designs, audio, video and any other information provided by you violates the rights of third parties; or (4) protect the rights, property or personal safety of FNF, its users or the public. We maintain reasonable safeguards to keep the Personal Information that is disclosed to us secure. We provide Personal Information and non -Personal Information to our subsidiaries, affiliated companies, and other businesses or persons for the purposes of processing such information on our behalf and promoting the services of our trusted business partners, some or all of which may store your information on servers outside of the United States. We require that these parties agree to process such information in compliance with our Privacy Notice or in a similar, industry -standard manner, and we use reasonable efforts to limit their use of such information and to use other appropriate confidentiality and security measures. The use of your information by one of our trusted business partners may be subject to that party's own Privacy Notice. We do not, however, disclose information we collect from consumer or credit reporting agencies with our affiliates or others without your consent, in conformity with applicable law, unless such disclosure is otherwise permitted by law. We also reserve the right to disclose Personal Information and/or non - Personal Information to take precautions against liability, investigate and defend against any third -party claims or allegations, assist government enforcement agencies, protect the security or integrity of the Website, and protect the rights, property, or personal safety of FNF, our users or others. We reserve the right to transfer your Personal Information, as well as any other information, in connection with the sale or other disposition of all or part of the FNF business and/or assets. We also cannot make any representations regarding the use or transfer of your Personal Information or other information that we may have in the event of our bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency, receivership or an assignment for the benefit of creditors, and you expressly agree and consent to the use and/or transfer of your Personal Information or other information in connection with a sale or transfer of some or all of our assets in any of the above described proceedings. Furthermore, we cannot and will not be responsible for any breach of security by any third parties or for any Privacy Notice Effective: January 6, 2015 actions of any third parties that receive any of the information that is disclosed to us. Information From Children We do not collect Personal Information from any person that we know to be under the age of thirteen (13). Specifically, the Website is not intended or designed to attract children under the age of thirteen (13). You affirm that you are either more than 18 years of age, or an emancipated minor, or possess legal parental or guardian consent, and are fully able and competent to enter into the terms, conditions, obligations, affirmations, representations, and warranties set forth in this Privacy Notice, and to abide by and comply with this Privacy Notice. In any case, you affirm that you are over the age of 13, as THE WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED FOR CHILDREN UNDER 13 THAT ARE UNACCOMPANIED BY HIS OR HER PARENT OR LEGAL GUARDIAN. Parents should be aware that FNF's Privacy Notice will govern our use of Personal Information, but also that information that is voluntarily given by children - or others - in email exchanges, bulletin boards or the like may be used by other parties to generate unsolicited communications. FNF encourages all parents to instruct their children in the safe and responsible use of their Personal Information while using the Internet. Privacy Outside the Website The Website may contain various links to other websites, including links to various third party service providers. FNF is not and cannot be responsible for the privacy practices or the content of any of those other websites. Other than under agreements with certain reputable organizations and companies, and except for third party service providers whose services either we use or you voluntarily elect to utilize, we do not share any of the Personal Information that you provide to us with any of the websites to which the Website links, although we may share aggregate, non -Personal Information with those other third parties. Please check with those websites in order to determine their privacy policies and your rights under them. European Union Users If you are a citizen of the European Union, please note that we may transfer your Personal Information outside the European Union for use for any of the purposes described in this Privacy Notice. By providing FNF with your Personal Information, you consent to both our collection and such transfer of your Personal Information in accordance with this Privacy Notice, Choices With Your Personal Information Whether you submit Personal Information to FNF is entirely up to you, You may decide not to submit Personal Information, in which case FNF may not be able to provide certain services or products to you. You may choose to prevent FNF from disclosing or using your Personal Information under certain circumstances ("opt out"). You may opt out of any disclosure or use of your Personal Information for purposes that are incompatible with the purpose(s) for which it was originally collected or for which you subsequently gave authorization by notifying us by one of the methods at the end of this Privacy Notice. Furthermore, even where your Personal Information is to be disclosed and used in accordance with the stated purposes in this Privacy Notice, you may elect to opt out of such disclosure to and use by a third party that is not acting as an agent of FNF. As described above, there are some uses from which you cannot opt -out. Please note that opting out of the disclosure and use of your Personal Information as a prospective employee may prevent you from being hired as an employee by FNF to the extent that provision of your Personal Information is required to apply for an open position. If FNF collects Personal Information from you, such information will not be disclosed or used by FNF for purposes that are incompatible with the purpose(s) for which it was originally collected or for which you disclosure and use. You may opt out of online behavioral advertising by following the instructions set forth above under the above section "Additional Ways That Information Is Collected Through the Website," subsection "Third Party Opt Out." Access and Correction To access your Personal Information in the possession of FNF and correct inaccuracies of that information in our records, please contact us in the manner specified at the end of this Privacy Notice. We ask individuals to identify themselves and the information requested to be accessed and amended before processing such requests, and we may decline to process requests in limited circumstances as permitted by applicable privacy legislation. Your California Privacy Rights Under California's "Shine the Light" law, California residents who provide certain personally identifiable information in connection with obtaining products or services for personal, family or household use are entitled to request and obtain from us once a calendar year information about the customer information we shared, if any, with other businesses for their own direct marketing uses. If applicable, this information would include the categories of customer information and the names and addresses of those businesses with which we shared customer information for the immediately prior calendar year (e.g., requests made in 2015 will receive information regarding 2014 sharing activities). To obtain this information on behalf of FNF, please send an email message to privacy@fnf.com with "Request for California Privacy Information" in the subject line and in the body of your message. We will provide the requested information to you at your email address in response. Please be aware that not all information sharing is covered by the "Shine the Light" requirements and only information on covered sharing will be included in our response. Additionally, because we may collect your Personal Information from time to time, California's Online Privacy Protection Act requires us to disclose how we respond to "do not track" requests and other similar mechanisms. Currently, our policy is that we do not recognize "do not track" requests from Internet browsers and similar devices. No Representations or Warranties By providing this Privacy Notice, Fidelity National Financial, Inc. does not make any representations or warranties whatsoever concerning any Privacy Notice Effective: January 6, 2015 products or services provided to you by its majority-owned subsidiaries. In addition, you also expressly agree that your use of the Website is at your own risk. Any services provided to you by Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and/or the Website are provided "as is" and "as available" for your use, without representations or warranties of any kind, either express or implied, unless such warranties are legally incapable of exclusion. Fidelity National Financial, Inc. makes no representations or warranties that any services provided to you by it or the Website, or any services offered in connection with the Website are or will remain uninterrupted or error -free, that defects will be corrected, or that the web pages on or accessed through the Website, or the servers used in connection with the Website, are or will remain free from any viruses, worms, time bombs, drop dead devices, Trojan horses or other harmful components. Any liability of Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and your exclusive remedy with respect to the use of any product or service provided by Fidelity National Financial, Inc. including on or accessed through the Website, will be the re -performance of such service found to be inadequate. Your Consent To This Privacy Notice By submitting Personal Information to FNF, you consent to the collection and use of information by us as specified above or as we otherwise see fit, in compliance with this Privacy Notice, unless you inform us otherwise by means of the procedure identified below. If we decide to change this Privacy Notice, we will make an effort to post those changes on the Website. Each time we collect information from you following any amendment of this Privacy Notice will signify your assent to and acceptance of its revised terms for all previously collected information and information collected from you in the future. We may use comments, information or feedback that you may submit in any manner that we may choose without notice or compensation to you. If you have additional questions or comments, please let us know by sending your comments or requests to: Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 601 Riverside Avenue Jacksonville, Florida 32204 Attn: Chief Privacy Officer (888)934-3354 privacy@fnf.com Copyright © 2015. Fidelity National Financial, Inc. All Rights Reserved. EFFECTIVE AS OF: JANUARY 6, 2015 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Issued by Fidelity National Title Insurance Company Fidelity National Title lnaunne Company Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, a California corporation, ("Company"), for a valuable consideration, commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the Proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest in the land described or referred to In Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the Requirements; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions of this Commitment. This Commitment shall be effective only when the Identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A by the Company. All liability and obligation under this Commitment shall cease and terminate Six (6) months after the Effective Date or when the policy or policies committed for shall Issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to Issue the policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. The Company will provide a sample of the policy form upon request. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Commitment to be signed with the facsimile signatures of Its President and Secretary and sealed as required by its By -Laws. Attest: Secretary CONDITIONS Fidelity National Title Insurance Company President 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquired actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or Interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. This Commitment is a contract to Issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of title or a report of the condition of title. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. Alta Commitment -- 2006 ORIGINAL CoverPage Form 1004-317 CLSS file # 19917728 Customer reference # Hollins Road 2 AFFIDAVIT OF NOTARY I, (please print name as commissioned), the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby affirm and attest to Fidelity National Title Insurance Company one of the following (please check one) is an accurate statement: ❑ I am a BancSery notary; or ❑ 1 have E&O ("Errors & Omissions") coverage for my notarial acts with a minimum of $100,000 coverage (please attach evidence); or ❑ I am a notary working under the supervision of a licensed attorney. Insert lawyer or law firm: ; or ❑ I am a notary working in a bank or credit union (this option is only applicable for notaries at banks and credit unions and is not applicable for notaries at mortgage companies or mortgage brokers). Insert bank or credit union name: Insert branch name or street address: Insert telephone number of bank or credit union office: Date Notary Public signature Telephone contact Notary # or Seal for identification purposes CLSS - Affidavit of Notary (Revised 03104113) Fidelity National Title Insurance Company OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT AND AGREEMENT State of Virginia Countyof Roanoke Commitment Number 19917728 William H. Mistele. Trustee under Declaration of Trust dated February 25. 1971 (`Owner"), being the individual owner(s) who are signing below, or the entity in ownership, which is represented by the individual(s) signing below; who, being duly sworn according to the law, deposes and says as follows (as the "Affiant"): That Affiant, as individual owner, has personal knowledge of the facts sworn to this affidavit; or, that Affiant, as entity representative, either has personal knowledge of the facts sworn to this affidavit, or has made statements based on diligent inquiry of the entity personnel and agents and on a diligent review of the entity records, and the statements are made on behalf of the entity and said Affiant is fully authorized to make this affidavit. That Owner is the owner of the premises described in the Commitment(s) listed above ("the Property") and shown in Exhibit A. Ownership shall mean that interest held by the Owner in the Property, whether a fee, leasehold or easement estate, and all statements below are in reference to said interest in said Property. That there has been no work, services or labor performed or material furnished in connection with repairs or improvements on the Propertywithin 123 days (herein after referred to as "Mechanics' Lien Filing Period") prior to the date of this Affidavit; or, that in the event work has been performed, services rendered, or materials furnished in connection with construction, repair, or improvement on the Property during such Mechanics' Lien Filing Period, that all such work performed, services rendered, or materials furnished have been completed and are acceptable to the Owner(s); the Owner(s) have paid in full all contractors, laborers, and materialmen for such work performed, services rendered, or material furnished in connection with constructions, repairs, or improvements on the Property during such Mechanics' Lien Filing Period, except as shown on exhibit attached hereto. NONE, unless specified on attached exhibit (checked box indicates an attached exhibit ❑ } 4. That there are no unrecorded tenancies, leases or other occupancies on the Property except as listed below, and that if any such unrecorded leases, tenancies or other occupancies are listed below, they contain no options to purchase, rights of renewal, or other unusual provisions except as shown on exhibit attached hereto. NONE, unless specified on attached exhibit (checked box indicates an attached exhibit ❑ ) That no other person has possession or any right to possession of the Property or any interest therein, including oil, gas or other minerals, other than those shown in Commitment 19917728. 6. 1 represent to Fidelity National Title Insurance Company that the Property is now free and clear of all delinquent taxes, liens, mortgages/deeds of trust/deeds to secure debt, judgments, decrees, or other encumbrances; that there are no unemployment compensation, federal social security, alcoholic beverage law or other delinquent state or federal taxes due and owing from the company; that there are no unpaid or delinquent real estate taxes or assessments or unpaid or delinquent water or sewer service charges against said premises; and that there are no unpaid or delinquent homeowner/condominium association dues (if applicable); EXCEPT THAT the matters specifically identified in the Commitment and those, if any, listed on exhibit attached hereto. NONE, unless specified on attached exhibit (checked box indicates an attached exhibit ❑ } T That there are no unrecorded easements or claims of easement; no disputes, discrepancies or encroachments affecting a setback or boundary line; and no contracts, options or rights to purchase other than in the transaction for which this affidavit is given. 8. That no proceedings in bankruptcy has ever been instituted by or against the Owner (and if a partnership, against the general partner(s) thereof), nor has the Owner ever made an assignment for the benefit of creditors. 9. That there is no action or proceeding relating to the Property in any state or federal court in the United States nor any state or federal judgment or any federal lien of any kind or nature whatsoever which now constitutes a lien or charge upon the Property. 10. That there are no delinquent state, county, city, school district, water district, or other governmental agency taxes a. due or owing against said Property and that CLSS - Owner Seller Affidavit 2013 Fidelity National Title Insurance Company OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT AND AGREEMENT Commitment Number 19917728 b. no tax suit has been filed by any state, county, city, school district, water district, or other governmental agency for taxes levied against the Property. 11. That there has been no notice nor does Affiant have any knowledge of any a. recent or future planned improvements (such as street paving, sidewalks, street lights, etc.) that would result in a special assessment against the Property b. any proceeding which could result in an increase tax or assessment liability against the Property. 12. That all management fees, if any, are fully paid, except as shown on exhibit attached hereto. NONE, unless specified on attached exhibit (checked box indicates an attached exhibit ❑ ) Owner, recognizing that funding may occur prior to the Deed, Lease, MOL, Easement, Mortgage, Deed to Secure Debt, Deed of Trust, or any Assignment being officially filed for record in the appropriate Clerk's Office, represents that there will be no further encumbrances or change of title pending the issuance of the title insurance policy which this affidavit is made to support and agrees that in consideration of Fidelity National Title Insurance Company (hereinafter "Company") issuing a policy without exception to any matters which may arise between the effective date of the commitment for title insurance and the date of the documents creating the interest being insured are filed for record, which matters may constitute an encumbrance on or affect the title (the "GAP"), to promptly defend, remove, bond or otherwise dispose of any encumbrance, lien or objectionable matter to title which may arise or be filed, as the case may be, against said Property during the GAP. Owner further agrees to hold harmless and indemnify Company against all losses, expenses, costs and fees, including, but not limited to, attorney fees, which may arise out of Owner's failure to so remove, bond or otherwise dispose of any said liens, encumbrances or objectionable matters. This Affidavit is given to induce Company to issue its policy or policies of title insurance with full knowledge that the Company will rely upon the accuracy of same. The Owner does hereby indemnify and hold Company harmless of and from any and all loss, cost, damage, and expense of every kind, including attorney's fees, which Company shall suffer or incur or become liable under its said policy or policies directly or indirectly, due to its reliance on the accuracy of the foregoing statements or in connection with its enforcement of its rights under this Agreement. DATED: William H. Mistele, Trustee under Declaration of Trust dated February 25, 1971 By: By: NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT State: County/City: Sworn, subscribed to and acknowledged before me this day of By: Notary Public Lessor's Site Naule: Hollins Road #12 Lessor's Site Number: VAROHR02 LEASE SUPPLEMENT Lessee's Site Name: Clearwater Lessee's Site Number: This Lease Supplement ("Supplement") is made this day of 2015 between Apex Towers, LLC, a West Virginia limited liability company, with its principal office located at 125 Whitestick Road, Beckley, West Virginia 25801, hereinafter designated LESSOR, and CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, a Delaware general partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless, with its principal offices at One Verizon Way, Mail Stop 4AW100, Basking Ridge, New Jersey 07920, hereinafter designated LESSEE, 1. Master Lease reement. This Supplement is a Supplement as referenced as such in that certain Master Lease Agreement between Pegasus Tower Company, LLC (successor by Certificate of Conversion from Pegasus Tower Company, Ltd,) and Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, dated July 15, 2007 (the "Agreement"), Pegasus Tower Company, LLC assigned all its right, title and interest in and to the Agreement to Apex Towers, LLC, as evidenced by that certain Assignment and Assumption of Master Lease Agreement, dated March 1, 2015. All of the terms and conditions of the Agreement are incorporated hereby by reference and made a part hereof without the necessity of repeating or attaching the Agreement. In the event of a contradiction, modification or inconsistency between the terms of the Agreement and this Supplement, the terms of this Supplement shall govern. Capitalized terms used in this Supplement shall have the same meaning described for them in the Agreement unless otherwise indicated herein. 2. Property. The Property leased by LESSOR is as described and/or shown on Exhibit 1 attached hereto and incorporated herein. 3. Premises. The Premises leased by LESSOR to LESSEE hereunder is described as a parcel of property containing a twelve foot (12') by thirty foot (30') parcel of land for its equipment, including, but not limited to, outdoor cabinets and a generator, together with a non- exclusive easement for a three foot (3') wide ice bridge, together with space on the Tower, all as shown on Exhibit 2 and as described in Exhibit 3, attached hereto and incorporated herein. LESSEE shall have the non-exclusive right to access and ingress and egress, seven (7) days a week, twenty-four (24) hours a day to and from the Premises and from and to Carlos Drive. a public right-of-way, LESSOR also grants to LESSEE the easement and right to access, install and maintain wires, cables, conduits and pipes either within, over, under or along the Property as shown on Exhibit 2. In the event any public utility is unable to use the aforementioned rights-of-way or easement, LESSOR hereby agrees to grant or obtain an additional right-of-way either to LESSEE or to the public utility at no cost to the LESSEE. The equipment LESSEE is permitted to install on the Premises is as set forth in the Application attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit 3. 4. Survey in the event an Exhibit 2 is attached hereto describing the Premises, LESSEE shall have the right to survey the Property and/or Premises and said survey shall, with the i Lessor's Site Name: Hollins Road #2 Lessor's Site Number: VAROHR02 Lessee's Site Name: Clearwater Lessee's Site Number: LESSOR'S consent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed, then become Exhibit 4 which shall be attached hereto and made a part hereof and shall control in the event of any discrepancies between it and Exhibit 2. This cost for such work shall be borne by LESSEE. 5. Term. The term of this Supplement shall be as set forth in Paragraphs 3, 4, and 5 of the Agreement. The Commencement Date shall be the earlier of the date that LESSEE begins installation of its improvements on the Premises (subject to Section 4 of the Agreement) or the first (1st) day of the month following substantial completion of the communications compound and Tower on the Property, except as provided herein. For the purposes of this section the communications compound and Tower shall be deemed substantially completed ("LESSEE Ready„) if, and only if, (1) the communications compound and Tower are installed and completed and all permits and approvals are received; (2) the infrastructure (including, but not limited to, the conduits and meter base) for all utilities is installed and available for LESSEE's use, LESSOR has paid the utility companies for any installation costs, and the Property has been inspected and approved by all applicable personnel for the installation of utilities; and (3) all access roads are completed and LESSEE has sufficient access to the site to install, operate and maintain Its equipment. To the extent that LESSEE incurs any expense when it orders and has installed the electrical utilities, LESSOR shall reimburse LESSEE any such amounts within thirty (30) days of invoice from LESSEE. LESSOR shall use commercially reasonable efforts to pursue timely completion of the communications compound and Tower, and make it LESSEE Ready within nine months of this Supplement being fully executed but not later than October 1, 2016. Notwithstanding any other provision in this Supplement to the contrary, in the event the Tower and communications compound are not LESSEE Beady by October 1, 2016 then LESSEE shall have the right to terminate this Supplement without penalty provided that this right to terminate is exercised in writing prior to the Commencement Date. LESSOR shall notify LESSEE of substantial completion of the communications compound and Tower by issuing a notice to proceed. 6. Rent. The Rent for the initial term pursuant to this Supplement shall be due at an annual Rent of , in advance, to LESSOR, Apex Towers, LLC, 125 Whitestick Road Beckley, West Virginia, or to such other person, firm or place as LESSOR may, from time to time, designate in writing at least thirty (30) days in advance -of any Rent payment date, 7. Prime Lease. The Property is subject to that certain Option and Lease Agreement by and between Highland Towers, LLC and Mistele Declaration of Trust, William H. Mistele, Trustee, dated July 23, 2014 (the "Prime Lease"). Highland Towers, LLC conveyed, transferred and assigned to Apex Towers, LLC all its rights, title and interest in and to the Prime Lease as evidenced by that certain Assignment and Assumption of Option and Lease Lessor's Site Name: Hollins Road ##2 Lessor's Site Number: VAR01JR02 Lessee's Site Name: Clearwater Lessee's Site Number: Agreement by and between Highland Towers, LLC and and Apex Towers, LLC, dated March 1, 2015, Copies of these agreements are attached as Exhibit S. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] [SIGNATURES ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE] Lessor's Site Name: Hollins Road #2 Lessor's Site Number: VAROHR02 Lessee's Site Name: Clearwater Lessee's Site Number: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hands and affixed their respective seals the day and year first above written. LESSOR: Apex Tow r , LLC, s limited liability company By: Name: avid B. McClure Title: Presid nt Date: OIVK�� LESSEE: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VerizopVireless By: Name: David R. Heverling Title: Area Vice PresidentN work Date: Lessor's Site Name: Hollins Road #2 Lessor's Site Number: VAROHRO2 EXHIBIT I DESCRIPTION OF LESSOR'S PROPERTY Lessee's Site Name: Clearwater Lessee's Site Number: C)PV L^t4U) Sil LJA I ELI ESOUTNEAST pr- THE INTV- RSV_ C -T -IOM OF H(71 -L INS RC ->AO (S,M. 001 ) AND C^FCLA:)z5 j7HIv,- t.cknA-rF=0 IN Cl0l1,Jr4_rY VIRGINIA: SAID PARCI-r--j- J3U-$p4,U "AT, -r- OF PAKC"T TMAC r NOW C>fq FORMERLY C7VVNG0 13V WILLIAM H. MJSTt�LF_ TMI�JSTV__E AS ME�COFrDL'0 IN THE. COVNTV CLJ6KK'-% AT INSTRUMENT "c3, U00430478b. ESE' ^tqO EXCE"T 1.200 ACHES HECORDEO AT fNS'URtjMr_NT NO. 2Cl,()0j3233 li^10 I-Af4C_4�1_ tlFING Mckf4E v -^#A-' lCU F0lI-_Lnvvzl I-Af'4L Y AS FRC-)" AN IfA"N RF. ftAR (P(SRJNO.) BEINpF T"f- VAS'TVfztLY RK3441-C3F -WAY CPU 41f:>j-LINS IRC'3^M (RT. 4501) ^F,447 THE 39C1,Lj I Mr- RI0l-JT-C>V-vv^Y c;>v- CARLOS nMO\/V= (RT, 616): TtJF-NOP- LEAVING SAID "W-HT-q::>f--.VVAyS ANn CCDPNT#NUfN4n3 I"HC3LJ"" THF SAI0 LANOG OF VVIX-,k,IAM ". MISTFLF. S30 -13.20-E, 3b7"-10' Tp AN 0HO" f,43iBAn W17-31-1 CAP t&T), SAID "L--93AR BUtN4v -F-HIF NOMTf-fVVLSTr=RL_Y c"RNV-Ij L-IE^S&E ^#;keA ^No TWF Tia U1= UEtiONNINC-i THFNC--F C-C]'"TINUINC '1`14RCAJ01-4 s^10 LANE ->S rC>r4 Tilt- "9 --XT 0-01jpc (4) C:ApUf;tSES. SfS7-14'61-17_ ISO.MD -p TCS AN 'F�tf- 'N fz?V "AFR VVlTH C-"_ (Sr_rf. SAID RECTA" N REeA" (V OL_fNL3) j3tj:^Hj"G N,60-Fx0,27-C. 1013. J%0.00' TO AN IRON "f_k3^j4 W11H CAP (SET): Tt-fr-N4-_F N5?__14't0l-VV, 60.00' TO AN 41_4(7N "UI3Af--t Wfl 14 CAF- 4SET), S^lp FlF,.nAqa pesw_- "CUO "y AN lr;tc*>rq "t. "^r' - VUOl <FQlJM-4) 1`4fMR#Nir� S53 -06'46-W. iU-NCr- Nn2'46'00-C, tSO.00- Tip TVIL POINT 'DF M Mi Mcr>Ml= OR LUSV. PROF�Q_5 �_ ".:Ay - A 20 IIF440� 20. 4 ( i w c—Aciq Sior, cm- CEN -T f3f=IN(3 SITU^TUM. kJeC:)" ^ F-AV4QIZ-L C) -V L -ANO L(,]C;^yr-0 i>F THE IN-TU=fAsEC--r#(7xN c3v- r-_4C>A" VF;J`l. 601) AND CARR ClS nFkfVr_ (S.M. 616) jr,, F4C>^N E C--"XJN'ry, VIRCAIP-41A: SAID - Nr TRACT NOW ioF;t FC)fVmj=pwj.,V C,,#%VNr FA_-�f�'NAU.Nl DCIrllta FlA$;tT 01F T"F PAnr OM - INAISTIZ:L-E. TRUSTUE AS REC(�1ROr-D Jrj Tt-4F- CC_lUNT-Y C_LfFRf<lS orrjt�-C_ A,, WILLIAM 04 V E3,y 1fl4STHLJMF_N'T NO, 200004705. LESS- ANn iEXCEPT 1,200 ACRE -13 AT "51 I'CUMtNT Na, (PARCEL 10- 030-0"1-437 00-0000); SAIn GENTEiiLTNt f3r-INlr-3 "<;PRU_'flA"TIE:AJLAMLY Or-&CRIDECI AS V<:>k_LtyVV,5. FROM AN MON RF -MA" (rcpu"o) or-lNu T"Ii, INTEIR*iVCTION CIF -Flif- 01F "C�LIANF, ROAD (V.Ji. tjol) ^"o -THV-- SC' UT"FMI,-y OF CARI,0,5 I>HIVF- (n -R- 616); TIAC-NCE LEAVING; SAD RIC-- VfT-Cpr_-WA V t> 414.7"' 7C> A F-c7)twr, n^on r-c)ipq-r Br_:j"o IN 7,)jE 5c> - -4E Y"UV- "04"l t>l` THENCE LEAVING SAID WAY QU 4C-:AfALCbN DF4tlVfE ANOYS UTHE"I'y "F RK3'-Hl -4Z)#7-VV^Y AND SAID I %AjSjrLE: F-, ,CC-)" "Vl� CW VVII_L_ JAM _,E NEXT Pr->UrA (A) COURSES; 70-03' TO A P'/;}INT S.47 -46'00 -VV, I ln,2L5rC-7 A r-l:>1V4T: 711UNCE7 WfT7k4 A CUM%/F, TO Y),fr- Lr -r, -T l_'^VlNC_> A Ft^"ILJ-3 C>V- A VELTA C:>V 90'00'00-. A LUNCTH OF 31.42', ^rlj" A COU_JRO Of- ?fL,p BFIN" IN THE. EASTERLY LING A f"O'N"; T"eNCIE 2�0.01'TC> A POINI C (:>F TIlr= F-11CPPOSE0 LIF^r-E- A"[,:A. SAIC) PC:pp"-F BepNcal I HE TF-FtIVIN"s OF FAk-.1--mLN1, I t3l At- LENGTH CD�V E^SeMt: N"I - 304,t"': CpIJTAINI"C-, 7,:0t4 S< . FT. (0,17 ACRES) Mc -Mr- c5n Lr6--.. 1 Lessor's Site Name: Hollins Road Q lessor's Site Nuinber: VAROHRO2 EXHIBIT z SITE PLAN Lessee's Site Name: Clearwater Lessee's Site Number: The Site Plan should show the fallowing items, if applicable: 1. Tower compound 2. Location of tower 3. Location of equipment on tower 4. Lessee's leased premises 5. Lessee's ground equipment 6. Lessee's separate generator pad if applicable 7 Any additional area needed for a grounding ring which may be in addition to Lessee's leased premises, if any 8. Lessee's Ice Bridge; and 9. Location of any specific right-of-way, easement or path ,being leased between any such tower and land parcel 10. Lessee's stoop easement 11. Lessee's pull box r � i EXHIBIT 2 PAGE 1 OF 3 ZL LESSOR PROPOSED 150' MONOPOLE TOWER k2 LESSOR 50x50' LEASE AREA LESSOR PROPOSED 50'x50' FENCED & GRAVEL COMPOUND ® LESSOR PROPOSED 12' GRAVEL ACCESS &5 EXISTING BUILDING WIz PARCE 1UO 0 ADD Scale I" = 100' a LESSOR PROPOSED 20'INGRESS/EGRESS & UTILITY EASEMENT B40MERING CONCEPTS, INC. LEASE EXHIBIT [sugAuLs'C: ,'=,00- 20 5, ROANOKE SY„ PO WX bW v COLLOCATION At s, 2o3s "O.�rs•�zMS FAX CLEARWATER 15oa7 EXHIBIT 2 AGE 2 OF 3 2.4' 2.4' N IE LEASE EXHIBIT COLLOCATION SHEET 2 OF 3 SCALE; 1"=20' August 3, 2015 15007 LESSOR PROPOSED 150' MONOPOLE TOWER A6 LESSOR PROPOSED ELECTRICAL H -FRAME A2 LESSEE ICE BRIDGE WITH 3' EASEMENT LESSOR PROPOSED 20' INGRESS/E'GRESS & zi LESSEE 7'X15' EQUIPMENT PLATFORM A UTILITY EASEMENT LESSOR PROPOSED 50 x50' FENCED & 4 LESSEE 4'X8' GENERATOR PAD WITH 1' A GRAVEL COMPOUND GROUND RING LESSOR PROPOSED 16' ENTRANCE GATE ZL LESSEE 12'X30' LEASE AREA A LESSOR PROPOSED 12' GRAVEL ACCESS ALESSOR PROPOSED FIBER H -FRAME AND MESA CABINET 2.4' 2.4' N IE LEASE EXHIBIT COLLOCATION SHEET 2 OF 3 SCALE; 1"=20' August 3, 2015 15007 I NA Lessor's Site Name; Hollins Road #2 Lessor's Site Nunnber: VAROHR02 EXHIBIT 3 SITE LEASE APPLICATION Lessee's Site Name; Clearwater Lessee's Site Number: Apex Towers Corporate OfHce- 125 Whltestick Road, Beckley, WV 25801 Phone: 304-256.6426 Fax: 304-252-1852 Tower Site Collocation Application Website: apex-towem.cont Development Office: 548 East Riverside Drive, Suite D, North Tazewell, VA 24630 Phone: 276-964-Y416 Fax: 276-963.2587 Please check one: New ❑+ Check Modification ❑Check Please complete below, sign and forward by emall Lo: Craig Clifton at cclitton@ Wex•tawers.com or Dale Hilt at dhifl(a�ex-towers.com . Please process the Site Application Fee and/or any other fees. Checks should be made payable to APEX TOWERS, LLC and forwarded to the Corporate Office. Once payment Is received, APEX will process the application. Application Fees are nut refundable. Site Application fee: $ Structural Fee: $ Fees jotherj: $ APEX TOWERS, LLC FEIN# 47-1971656 DATE OF APPLICATION: 28 -Aug- I PROJECTED ON AIR DATE: Company Name TENANT INFORMATION Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wirefess State of Incorporation Delaware Legal Entity Name General Partnership Notice Address One Verizon Way, Mail Stop 4AW100 Notice City Basking Ridge Notice State New Jersey I Notice 21P Code 7920 TENANT CONTACT INFORMATION TYPE First and Last Name PHONE It EMAIL Address Signatory David R. Heverling Signatory VtOe Area Vice President Northeast Area Legal RF Engineering Guy Randall (757) 370.7049 Project Engineer Real Estate Richard Rosenfeld 704-905-4585 1 richard.rosenfeldfgdnsites.corn Site Acquistion Richard Rosenfeld 704-905-4585 Other. TOWER SITE INFORMATION (data for this section may be found at www.apex-towers.com) APEX SITE NAME and NUMBER: Clearwater LATITUDF:J 37 19 44.9 SITE ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Rd LONGITUDE: 179 55 32.475 CITY / STATE / ZIP: Roanoke, VA, 24018 CARRIER SITE NAME and SITE IDR Clearwater SITE FCC REGISTRATION NUMBER: TBD gra,... * - PROPOSED ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS, HARDWARE, AND FREQUENCY Antennas Antennas Antennas Sector 1 Sector 2 1 Sector 3 TMA RRU/RRH Microwave Other Quantity (3) B25 RRH 4x30- (2)LNX- 2) LNX- 4R (PCS) (2)LNX-4514DS 4524DS 6515DS (3) 813 (2) HBXX-6517DS (2) HBXX- (2) HBXX- RRH 4x30 (2) RHSDC- 6517DS 6517D5 4R(LTE) 3315 -PF -48 (3) B4 RRH2x60- 4R (AWS) Manufacturer Alcatel ANDREW ANDREW ANDREW Raycap Lucent Type & Madel LTE - LNX- L65 -5S- 3) 825 RRH 4514DS 6515D05 4x30 -4R LTE-LNX-451405 PCSL-HBXX PCSL-HBXX (PCS) PCSL-HBXX-6517DS 651705 6517DS (3)B13 LTE - LNX-4514DS LTE - LNX- LTE -LNX- RRH 430- (2) RHSDC- AWS-HBXX-6517DS 4514DS 6515DS AR (LTE) 3315 -PF -48 AWS -HBXXA X {3) B4 651705 6517DS 51705 RRH2x60- 4R (AWS) Weight (2)LNX- (z) LNX- (2)LNX-4514DS- 4514OS- 6515DS- 29.3lbs 29.3lbs 43.7lbs 53lbs, (2) HBXX-651705- (2) HBXX- (2) HBXX- 57.2lbs, 32lbs 43.Olbs 6517DS - 65170S - 55lbs 43.Olbs 43.0lbs Dimensions (2)LNX- (2) LNX- 4514DS- 6515DS- 21.2" x (2)LNX-4514DS- 51.5"x15.3 96.6"x11.9 12.0" x 515"x15.3"x6.4" „x6.4" „x71" 7.2"/ (2) HBXX-6517DS - (2) HBXX- (2) HBXX- 21.6" x 25.66"x17. 74,9"x12.0"x6,5" 6517DS- 6517DS - 12.0" x 9"/ 34"4025 74.9"x12.0 74.9"x12.0 36.61"810. "x6.5" 63"x5.75" RAD Center AGL 147" 197" 147" 147" 147" Mounting Height AGL (if different) na na na Mount Type Sector Sector Sector Mount Mount Mount Azimuth 20 180 300 Meth Tilt 2,2,2,2 2,0,2,0 0,2,0,2 Tx Frequency 776. 787, 2120 - 2130, 2130 - 2135, 2135 - 2140, 1970 - 1975, 1975 - 1990, 880 - 890 891.5 - 894 � t � Rx Frequency 746 757, 1720- 1730, 1730.- 1735 1735 - ]740,1890 1895,1895 -1910, 835 -:845 846.5 - 849 Antenna Gain (dB) ff Lines per Antenna ONE this ONE this sector blit sector but This sector two3otal for all 3 two total is fed from Fiber Dist. sectors for.alF'3 sectors Box Line Manufacturer HU13ER+SUHNER Line Type Feil from H+5 MLCH 12x6AWG H+5 MLCH FnB Ht5 1.43" Fiber 12x6AWG MLCH 1.43" fiber 12x6AWG 1.43" Fiber Line Diameter .1.43" 1.43'; 1,43" Proposed Ground Lease Dimensions: 12'x 30' Shelter or Outdoor Equipment: Outdoor Generator Manufacturer: Cummins Generator Pad Dimensions: 4' x 8' pad ruel Type: diesel GROUND DATA Equipment Pad/Platform Dimensions: 7'x15' Shelter Dimensions (IxWxH): na Generator Make& Model: DGHCB-X 40 kW Generator Capacity: 4Qkw Tank Size: Transmitter 1 Transmitter 2 Transmitter 3 Transmitter 4 BTS Mfr: Type & Model: Type of Service: flack Dimsn: Cabinet Dimsn: BTS Dimsn: Call Sign: 4 Channels: Tx Power: Desired ERP: Elec Service: N of Outlets: Combiners: k of Ports: Other Equip: SUBMITTALAND APPROVAL TENANT SIGNATURE GATE: APEX TOWER SIGNATURE DATE: Lessor's Site Name: Hollins Road #2 Lessor's Site Number: VAROHRO2 EXHIBIT 4 LESSEE'S SURVEY (To be attached, if at all, at a later date) Lessee's Site Narm: Clearwater Lessee's Site Number: ? � Y Lessor's Site Name: Hollins Road #2 Lessor's Site Number: VAROHRO2 EXHIBIT 5 PRIME LEASE Lessee's Site Name: Clearwater Lessee's Site Number: Site Name: Rollins Road 2 L"e" "r e f C" i : i 'Y71 3;1 r Site Number: VAROFIR2 , _. ..,�f _-t :it:., ,_, ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF OPTION AND LEASE AGREEMENT STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF ROANOKE } RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Apex Towers, LLC 125 Whitestick Road Beckley, WV 25801 `fax Map: 39, Parcel 09-01-07.00-0000 THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF OPTION AND LEASE AGREEMENT (this "Assignment") is made as of March 1, 2015 ("Effective Date"), by and between HIGHLAND TOWERS, LLC, a West Virginia limited liability company ("Assignor"), whose address is 125 Whitestick Road. Beckley, West Virginia, and APEX TOWERS, LLC, a West Virginia limited liability company ("Assignee"), whose address is 125 Whitestick Road, Beckley, West Virginia. BACKGROUND RECITALS WHEREAS, Highland Towers, LLC entered into that certain Option and Lease Agreement with The Mistele Declaration of Trust, William H. Mistele, Trustee dated July 23, 2014 in regard to real property located in Tinker Creek District, Roanoke County, as set forth in Instrument Number 200604785, A Memorandum of Option and Lease Agreement dated August 1, 2014 was recorded in the Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Clerk on August 14, 2014 as Instrument Number 201407364 and the leased area is more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto, and WHEREAS, Assignor has agreed to convey, transfer and assign to Assignee without recourse all of its right, title and interest irr and to the Option and Lease Agreement and Assignee has agreed to accept an assignment thereof; and Site Nanae: Hollins Road 2 Site Number: VAROHR2 W OPERATIVE PROVISIONS NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the sure of $10,00, the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, as well as other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The Background recitals hereinabove are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Assignor hereby assigns to Assignee as of the Effective Date without recourse all of its right, title and interest in and to the Option and Lease Agreement, together with any amendments to the Option and Lease Agreement, and Assignee hereby assumes and agrees to pertbrm from and after the Effective Date all of the Assignor's obligations under the Option and lease Agreement upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Option and Lease Agreement, 3, Except as expressly set forth herein, Elie terms of the Option and Lease Agreement shall rernain in full force and effect, unaltered by this Assignment. Assignor hereby covenants, agrees and represents that, to the extent any consents are necessary to consummate the transaction contemplated hereby, they have been procured. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Assignment to be duly executed as of the date first above written. (REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENHQAIALL Y LEFT BL4,1D e Site Name: Hollins Road 2 Site Number: VAROHR2 j 1 ASSIGNOR: HILI 4AN T ,' %. David B. Me lure Its President STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA COUNTY OF RALEIGH Dated:—} I, i'� 1(A DO ) f "i, tt7i , a Notary Public for the State of West Virginia, do hereby certify that the above-named Highland Towers, LLC, a West Virginia limited liability company, by David B. McClure, its President, did personally appear before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument, Witness nay hand and official seal this thea day of \UrC 2015• STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA [[t� _ OFFICIAL SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC Notary Public STATE of WEST vlRcrNlk •' ,( .s j, �:y: VJILRORN M Commission Expires: 125 WHITESTICK ROAD 81-CKLEY, WV 25861 tAy Commission Expires Apr. 71., 2n23 - .e'�sd+:6tio..5�d�.9ii+e*3E'ae�m.Aaw.f°.b'+•h.J.,-�. •. +.{ STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA COUNTY OF RALEIGH I, , , a Notary Public fior the State of West Virginia, do hereby certify that the above-named Apex Towers, LLC, a West Virg minia limited liability company, by David B, McClure, its President, did personally appear before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official seal this the -1 Co day of_� �,}2015, SEAL Notary Public OFFICIAL. SEAL My Commission Expires; - - �r NOTARY Pt18LfC i'./ , • =. r, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA WANA WiLRORN _ 126 VJHITFSTICK ROAD G BECKLEY, WV noo1 7fy^ (ommisaiun Expires ;y,�, 23, . ; 3 Site Name: Hollins Road 2 Site Number: VAROHR2 EXHIBITA -4- Fm Ilyorxt 3rrut Hanot rn i g r 3Uaa�J�FNMds !I II IiI` iIvi��f•4•L��:i n .v.. _. .�.... ...�..... V1Ty2222 fp0.c� qO -nom �QZ�PFmfflig g 'd 4-03f � "OD Ilyorxt 3rrut Hanot rn i g r 3Uaa�J�FNMds !I II IiI` iIvi��f•4•L��:i n .v.. _. .�.... ...�..... V1Ty2222 fp0.c� qO -nom �QZ�PFmfflig g 'd j i . fr b�a}{trroiHp� i ,,rtrt��W li.,f v 6Fg$x R �TFi SS���� 7kZCD✓; � �1� Fg7 iii �c��i � �6 YCJ1S� gH• d�C �,���8�3 s �_� u�����i 4,�� �€1q���d• a, CII Imp gig l IRMO Fix l.d 71 aSIz01.mFi1xE n�s c i< ww v.3 s my 'a\ W N�9dVON PLS t I `\ 1 'a\ W �_in � �i" v µ __ .. -� ��r-'��-+lri ='tj - :iF(i'ri�vi?ii. t�C':If ilihf?-rlC�tfnS �(li�(.� So R1um'.��r. VARC}F�}2? OPTIONAND H IN OP 11O\, ;1= 1.1 A Ai ;1( iltl•F NIIKI r -tVR-vnlem"). dined u, of the dalc hcIoc�. is enteral inui by NOW I)celaratictrl ilfTru t. William II. R-lislelc. lrusWO Frith a Ta.xl-r;tyer IW ot'W-9 on tile. wkh n nmilds nddrev.s t,I'S239 Summer f)Av. Roanoke 1':1NON (hcreirlitite:r COJICCti\cl� relerred to as "Landlord") and 11C, a West Virginia Hilliml Liability ( ompany, together with its s lhsidiaries mutt al3iliate , having an ttftice at 125 W hilestick (toad. Bvcklcy. West Virginia, 2580I (herc.inaiiei collce6vOy ret6i-cd to as Tenant"). BACKGROUND WHEREAS, Landlord owns that certain plot, parcel or tract ofland. together with all rights and pri ileges arising rn connection therewith. locate(] ill the rill](cr C'rcok District, Itomiokc County, in the State of Virginia, that is more particularly described in attached Atii% A (hereinafter the "Property"): and 1NHERLAS. "I cnum desires to explore the possibility of using it portion (Rile Property to construct. O\Vn, and operate a teleconnllttnicat ions facility. The parties agree as Ulows: 1'. OPTION TO LEASE. (A) Landlord hereby grants to'l enant an option (tile "Option") to Icase that portion of'the Property with a dimension of 10' � rr . together wRh an easement for ingress, egress and utilities as necessary for 'renal -ill use Dom the nearest public right -of' w iy or road as described oil attached Exhibit B (hereinafter collectrl'el)" lilt' "Prun11Sesh Landkwd and I maul hcrch\ grcc that Fxhibit 13 Atilt he NViscd to reflect IIIc resulls of an actual survey of the Premises, A mcrised (lcscrilrtiOrl h,'ISCd On thO survC3 relay he m1milutcd for Fxhibil B yon gVnwM of Landkwd and l'cnam. and sh<lll Know a rnviwHal part of ME Agrecmetlt. (I3) Diming the Option period am! atty extension thereof, and during the lore onNs Agm n7ent. Anant and its agentv etlefine= nwvc+pwN am! caller rcl)l'cat•rttatives will ll ljvc the right to c111cr upon tilt° Properly tat in4pec.l. examine. D,NIS (t lArted 2011)) f;�ic f`lruna. Rr��nokr,�-hlGlhr�s.>_inr-t,_i Site: Njinhw: VARCHR2 e0luluct Soil drainaix tcsling. ]naterial "amplin'. and )the)- pca lupical of 011pintrri€t; te'.t, III',[delic, (,Pelle' I'ropert� (Co Ile clkel)• the ' Fes[s'), Ik) apply Jor ailk I obtain lice€ls(�• perrllii,, approvals, orolkI ruliCI'rrytIiVC( l Of' 01' (1CCIrlCd llt'Ut54ar} or aIppr(.Ip€ iatc at Lcnunt's solC (Iist!mioll fur its usr ill - the I'renlisc,. itild include %N.Ithout Iill IimIion ahIll reiIiiOI15 IiW /0111n,' 1 driUl'1CVS. %i, Intik? ORInlWIC LS. iiI11C:11(1111Cllts. spciial else Iwrnlita, tlild t'ollsl€'k€t't1011 per'li,its (collectively r'l ff I'I'(CI to cis -Gm erilmcnlal ApprovoIs"), and othei-x isc to do 111O.SC things on OF ()tithe Property [hilt. in the opinion of"Lcnant, arc necess€lry in 'I elrtnl's sale discrelion t() determine the physic[[, condition of the Prrl oln the enn•ir+. mmerllal Mmory of the Property, Landlord's title to the PnWwV and elle fhasiNhy or suitability oflhe Properly 1611,cnm€it's Permittee, Use, all at Tenant", expense, Tenant %ill not be liable. to Landlord or any third party on account ofany pre-cxis hW defect or cunWdon on or "ith respect to the Property, NvIlcilier° or not such defect or condition i5 disclosed by "t'enant's inspection. (C) In coirWtralion of Landlord granting Town! the Option, Tenant hereby agrees to pay Landlord the sunt of .• The Option % gill be for an initial tern, of one (1) year fihe "Initial Option 'Lcrm") and may be renewed by Tenant I'm- one (I ) year Upon, \vritlen nolificittion tel Landlord Au later than, ten (1O) days prior til Clic cxpiralioll (tate of'thc; Initial Option `Perm and any extensioun then ol'. (D) During; the Initial Option Term and any cmcflsion thereof,1 cnttnt rllay ewrcise the Option by notifying Landlord in mAldng. IfTenam exct'cises the Option. then L.anlllor(1 AM We the Premises to the Tenant and the Tenant shall lease the !'remises fra)nl the Lrimilml upon the 16110wing terms an(f conditions. 11' Tenanl slows lila exercise (llr 01)6011 during the Initial 01)Ii011 Te€ -n, nr 111ie CNICIltiion thereof. this A91 -cement %x ill terminate and the parties will hay e no ftu-thcr liability to each oils `r. T'e'nant doles not have !n proN ide notice to Landlord !hat I enaW «ill not CWI,Cisc f is Option. D.M (updated ?dllll) =;€�� Cdan,�kc�ar_o3_e�_Holli�r, $nac� 11. I E101S OF LEASE (A) 13ERAIVI'TE1) 1tSh., 'I ell Int {and its lcsscc.4, still-less(vs, of liccn;ee�) [11113. use tllc Prenlise.s for the incl Ivecia ,rl oI'cnlnnlullieal Ks ti pmk and the installatkn, Inallnlenanee, opw--boll. repall' and I' placelllellt of its uonlnlUniidlionhti ttxttn'CS MILl WkIlcd C(ll€Il)lnOnt, Cilhle`, acl'CSSI,rres and lallprovelllent5 (e'llllecikely. the "('c)illlllanitcolion Fovilit�-): such arse hICIMIcs the right io test, Surf( )- arld check title on the Propert), and the right t€) conxtruct a t{lw(r, n)c)nupule ur other suitable stlpporl Structure. associated antennas, equipment shelters or cahinels. and Fencing and any other items necessary to the successful and secure operation of the Conlnunimion Facility, "1 enant has the right to €nst<ill and nperate tralnnmk ion cables from the ecluipnletlt shelter(s) or eabinet(s) to the allten€las, electric lines 1t'om tllc main teed to the egUil)n1Cnt shelter(S) or cabinet(s) and comm unicatioil lines front the main entry point to the equipment shelter(s) or Cabinet(s), and to make 11rerniscs improvements, trlteraiiom. or additions appropriate for t'enant's use (-Tenant Changes-). 'Fenant Changes illellldc'. the right t() construct a Fence around the Premises and undertake any other appropriate means to secure the Prerniscs. Tenant ngl'ces to culnply with all applicable governmental laws. rules, statutes Ind regulalionS, relating 10 its use ot'tlle Communication Facility on the Prcrllises. Tmaw Ims the right to momp, , supplcment. replace, upgrade, expand the eclklipmcnt, increase the number of antennas or Mom the Conlniunication Facility lvithin the Prcmi xs at arty time during Ove tam of this .'1gmcrrlcnt. '1'(:Imm WH he alllo" ed lel make such nherOms to the Promises in oR&r to nccmnphsh "Tenant's (Tanpes c,r tt) insure that 'Ienant's (' mmunicAm Why cwnidics with all opiplivowe R'cicrall, stat( or to al Ia"'S. rttICS or leg€dations. (B) TKRAL (el) 1 he inhial lease terns mill he li�c (:`) �c'lrs f"hlilial lernl' ) commenchy upon We (Vmnlc)relnwa Dal(% as defined beloNN 'I he Initial I crnl [)N43 twAled allot) ? Mite_ Noll`�v Rootk�_I-iciliriS }Zn �l Silo Nun}bee W Hr22 will wrllllllI at ' {til the IEl"t dui of the niorltll 111 til hlch lhL' Il III) MulLIr11 UI1nIhC1SiU'\' (11 the ( olullienvelswill Dale okxiil-rod. (11)'I Ills Agreenle111 "IH auti+nruieall% tilr nine (`>) adtiitinnn] list' t 5I 1Cil r I'rrn3(4) 111112 "1'.XtCW1i011 10IA11. 11I1n11 the ti:Inlr I('Tllla,lllll C'onditiorts urdcw the l enant WHies Owl rindW ire vrdinr oIf I cn inl'�, intention not io rene%\ Illis A4;Yt:t` unit at lcllst thirty (30) clitYti (blot' to the CXI)irillion of flit e\is illg 1-crill. (C) lie Initial 1 cent and the Evension'renn(s) are coflectivcly refirrcd to ,is Illi I1:r111 ("'I (C) 1f21.NT. (,l) Corllnienclng on the first (Illy of the nlilnlh k4loll'Ng the: (late upon `c idi I rimu conlnler ccs coi1s(mcdon (the Alnlrnencemerlt Date' ), I viva 11 Will pay the f.andlorcl a inonVily rentnl pttytlicnt of Landlord, at the address eel Rii-th above::. (b)' (D) APPROVALS, (a) Landlord agmes that Tellani's abilily to use the Pronises is eoiltingent upon its suitability Ar Tenant's intended use and Tenant's ability to obtain all governmental licenses. permits, apmovals or other re.licf recluired of or deemed necessary Lir appropriate by `I'enwit tilr its use of the Prerllises, including mAhout linnitatlon applications for zoningvariances, zoning ordiniinces, anlendnlunts, special use per111its, and Construction permits (collectively Deferred to Rs "(iovernnwiltal ApprovvIVY L,lnclloid atnhodms I'enant to prepare, e.xceute and file, illi rCtlVmd iq)plications it) obtuirl Ciol'CI'r3111ct11a1 Apprmal's fili' Tenant", Ilse 0 under this Aureenleni ,incl agrees to rcasilnahl� ,l1,5i1A'l CDW)I With such applicaliurrs. (!1} 'I c:nan( Iia,; the right 10 obtain ,l title rc I)OF-I or eunlulitnlc:nl Ior u lcaschold title pKicv Joni a title insttr,lncc connparl) of ill choice and to ha c the I'rullertti Suri eved 1)) :I ' uLll \ r Of ifs t}luiCC I)%(u11"awl AM) a "fit: N mtf j�tai.tc.i $11� I�ltunbv VAR0r,R2 (c) I crlarll rna� ulso AMR at l'cnanr's .eulC cost and t.\17c'Wm .Soil hurur�. percul;ltion. CngincCrint prcfccdtn-cs, cnN irurr111cr1tul inXestig;rtitan Or WIWI' tc'SlS Or Ivporl� tcollcc•tiv cls 010 " I'rtits") on. t+ger, and under €11e I'rcmisc5. neeessa€v to de€ermine ifthc Tenant's use refute Premises will 1112 enrnpatillle will) Tenant's crrgincerint'speCiiic;€limns. syslvm. design, tlpercoio s or Goverrinwillal 'Approvals. Allows: (1'.) TE'R1111':\A ION. Phis Atrc;.errlcnt miry he WmArrated, without petlalty mr iilt'tltc.r' liahility. cls (a) By either party on thirty (aft) clays prior wrilten notice, if the other party remains in dehuh under Mgraph M of this ngreerneul after the applicable Cure periods; (b) This Lease niav be terminated Without 1'ur(her liability Zs follows: (i) by'l errant A any reason or filr no reason, provided Tenant del ivors written notice of early ternlination to I_clndlord not litter than one 1 1) year pricer to the '1cminatioll Date; or (ii) hy'Tenant if it does not obtain or maintain any license, permit, or other approval necessary J61' the COINrLICtron and operation cel Premises; or (iii) upon lhir•ty (30) days prior «Wtte.n notice by An= if Am is unable to trccupy and utilize the Premises due, to an action of the FCC. or other governmental agency; or (NJ upon My (30) day's prior X1'1 ucii notice by Tenanl ifTenant dMi-mines that the Prenlises arc not appropriate, suitable or desirable for its operations for economic or techrudogical reasons. including, nithoul limilrrtion, signal intedbrence, 01 INSURANUE, 'ITencult will carry during. tile Ti21-111. at its ok, ii cost and expense, the UK" ink in moncc: [i 1 -AH Dish" propert� insurulcC lire its property's rci]aCerllcnt cilst: [iii caiminercial gcncrill liallility insuranCt,�c itlt a Illllr11111]It'1 11n111 l�f hilb31lt1' of 1,000-000 comli ed single Bruit I'ur WA4 il> wy or deaMirllnTerty darrut e iu' AL, out t Ian, tint: crcc'urrence: ;turf (iii 1 Ifni ers' ('trjvnsit tit) n Irrstn•itncc inti retluirc'd h. live. DNI-? {upd ited 2010} 5 :uric i umbw VAROHR2 91 INTERFERENCE, IW I alkIld Mill I€lit PVala, alter the dttic oI'Ihi" A'gicerincal. .I lease, IiccIis(: or ani (It Iwl right to ani third party Ior the' u',e Ili the Pro]lcr'ly, ifsuch Ilse 111a� ill till.\ \%c1� tItl\crs0l� AIM asr iinlc'rli'ra \\ill) I crunit'S ('olninoni(.atioll" I"',WiIiIy. LancllOrd ti�iII nutil'� I enfant incl 1'1 �Xk: l enarlriIIeII I prior ita granting any third pnrty the do" tri install and opcialc colrnmrrlicaliclns u(luiflnle.rlt cin the Property. Nolhing contained 11crein will restrict '1 chant nor its su AXISsurs and assigns II'alln installing;[fid 1110difV111L its L'o111111tlllicat€ons ccllllpineill. (ll) Landlord will not Ilse. nor will Landlord permit its employees. tenants. lice.nsccs, ins itces or agents to use, any porlioln of t1w Property in any Way which Walms whh the opemdons o1"T hath or the rights ofTenarll under this Agreement. Landlord will cause such interference: to Matic upon not marc than twenty-four (24) holir noHce fivnl Tenant In the event any sueln €filled renc:e to l'caank operations does not cease within the af'orenlentioned t;urc periocf them the parties ackWedge that Tenant will suffer irrepwahle injury, and therefore. 'Tenant brill hwe the right, in addition to ally other rights that it may have at haw or in cell€ily. lilr Landlord's breach of this Agmemenin to elect to enjoin such into€-lea•ence or to terminate the Agreennent upon notice to Landlord. (1.1) INDEMNIFICATION. (a) Tenant agrees to indenlrlify. defend and hold Landlord harmless li'on'€ and against any injtu'y. Ions. damage: (i1' liability (or ally c lairriS ill re.sJ)"t (1l till; l'oregoing), costs of expenses (including remonahle attonwy f fees aml court ro.Sls) arising dil'eclly slut Of Me itlstallati(1n, use. 1110intcnance. repair I)]' removal ofllnc ('o111mu11icatkM IMlily or the hrcaa•h ofany provision of this Alvicemcnt. cxeel)t to the txtcnt attrihiliahle to the negli;licnt or inicnlional Inca or onlissiorl of, t.,uuM r& its cnnploy'ccs, aged€s or independent ('onlrt€eicil's. (h) l..;uuilord agree'> to indemnify. dcl6ld and hold I cnant horinllcsS hrom and against arl� and all in;urs. € am damage or hal-Iility for any claims in respect cit fila liwgui ig). costs cw expenses t includinp iw amable attor'ncys' lecr tund cc,urt casts} aritiing direeli� out ol'Ille actions or fail€Il.e to net ol'Latldlord csr iLs i�n3 (111)(lated iMO) h 5 ' ,'k; tgii111N' t�(f; IF1VRCvttl+I it1,5_I�w4q Slid Nuwbti, VAROHR2 enlhloyck-, to upcnts, (11' tilt• luc•aell of "111) Kirit kion n1• this .lgrcenwilt. ezccpt to the c.Xtent attriblitabIC to tilt° ltz°tdhtcirt or imntRuud act or emission of I titan W nllplc»vvc agora +Ir independent c•orltraetors. (Cl t)111'ilhSl€llldlrl`1 ull1'thinL to the Ctlntr€u'1' ill thio AgIVCII e'IIt. CdCh OJ 1'entrnt and 1_andbW hereby "aixes any claims that they may have apainm the other vitt rCspCCt to consequential, inc•idellud or special damages, (i) 1VA11IZA NTIES, (a) Tenant and Laltdlurd cncll aCK'II0%Vlcdge and rel)FOSCnt that It is duly csrgani'red, %'obeli), existing and in good stamling and has the right, po" er and authority to enter into this AVreernent and bind i1scl1'heret0 tllrouph the party seal firth as signatory for the party below, fh) MAW represents and warrants that: (i) Landlord solely owns the Property in Ise simple, or controls the Propetty by lease or license, unencumbered by any liens, restrictions. mortgages. covenants, conditions, easements, leases, ap-eenlents ofrecord or not of record. which Would adversely, affect Tenant's use and enjoyment Who Prmnises under tills Agwe€mmit; (Ir) as long as 'Tenant is not in default then Landlord grants to Tenant sole, actual. quiet an(] peaceful use. enjoyment and possession td the Premises, (iii) its execution and perfonriance of Ns Ap;reunlent will not violate any Laws, onihmnees, covenants or the. provisions ofany mortgage, lease or other apl•eentcm binding tlrl the Landlord; and (iv) if the ]'raperty is or hecutnos cneuntbcred by rl deed to scctrre a debt. mortgage or other security illterest, l_andlurd will use hest cfforts to provide promptly to Tenant a mutt€filly agreeable SulxmH 6wL NowDisturhaticc and Attornment Agreement. (;l) Ii:NNAIZ{)NAMEN TAL. (.I) Landlord and 'I eimM agree thru tacit >, dI be responAhlc Ir its separate compliance %N 011 any and all cn%ironnicntsd and industrial hygiene Itr+sti, ink+Idirljt any replltltlt= '!1tldCllrl , titillldalY A in p diel ofany pilvarilllentlll WHO-, myrd sting or imposOg siamlarrls of liuhility- or standards (if conduct Wh regard to all, i:111'Iroll InCHUd or kBdno:lrial 4:kmdlt€fill or other Illatters as iia.' €11711of at ony I)\9-3 (updated 2010) 7 S lr: N m v Fic;:I C,ct: �Ac Nmrnt;rr VAn©Hri., -- 111110 herC;liter he in eflht. ONO WV no" 111' "00 rel,rlc'cl Ire At own > trickt omductcd ill or,m tic 1'roperta, (h) 1 ;1lydlOY1.1 and 101MIt tlgRV t1, hold h;u-nllcssand indcrllrnill t11c other lions. ,u1{1 to as.si n1c,111 dirties, rusptmsihililics and hilbililics al its s,+lc co,t cruel expense. l fur paymcm of pc,nultics, ti,trlCti0IlS- It,sscs, enst, X11 clanla cs) ;Intl 1'11r rCSprrncling to any action, notice, Claim. order, sulltnlrrns, Citalion, direciivc. h1ig,rtioll. investigation or procee=ding vvftich is related to (i) liailtrrc to Wlllpl� With .1nv envir011111untal law. inrlutlirlg witllottt linnitation 4€1» ri:g€II,€tic,:t.s. guidelines, standards or policies of any govommental authori(ics regulating, or imposing standards of'liahHky or standards of COIRIU I with regard to any envtrommenlal condillons or maters as ]noisy now or hereafter he Iii t; bo, and (1r) any C11N`Iroliln ental Conditions that arise out cif or arc in any way related to the Condition of ilne Property or activities conducted by 111C party thereon, unless the environmenlal conditions are Closed by the other party. (c) The indene nificatiom of this Paragral)h specifically inc:lt.rde reasonable costs. expenses and fees incurred in connection with any investigation oi' Property Co ndiliolp, or any cleall-111), rennedial. removal or restoration work required by ani, gol Mr€11nne;rntal authority. The Pro1'islons of ON Pa1'f pso heel{ smove to czpira(io€n or to€-€1lination of'this Agreement, (K) ACCESS, Al all tholes throughout the term of this Agreement, eines al no additional charge to Tenant, "Tenant and its cnnployces.. agents, and stlbcontractmV von have twenty -fain- hour, seven clay access, to and over (lie Property. Crohn in opern and lInprovccl puhlic road 1c1 the Premises, for the insl,dlatiorl. mai fit enalice and oper,rtion ol`Ihc (' mimunicaticun Facility and 11n), wilihes (unc eQ'-'roulId or nverhM) sminy the. 1'rcnnkm f'pon TenanQ request. I.tlndlord will execute an ca emm" evidmcirlg this right. len €he;:\^cnt Tenant or,111�; public unlit)' is unable to use Ilnc access or casismi nt provided to Tenant then the. Landlord hcrQ agrves to grant addhitrnal access or cascment either to 'I enarnt t'IL tt1 the ptrhlie utility. filr the hcnclit of'l mans, at no cost to 'len,€nl. 11;1 _3 t11pd;Itc d ?o l m Sit,: Wan:r:. Ro an,mt:-Vfolh—n- hoar_S sk t'tilr l i!', V9301 (t.) liEMON Al - 111 portions 411,111c Cc}nlnlnnic•ation 1 ucih(N hrought olilo 11: )'realise~ hk IcIlont ~kill he and rcaloills f:n;usl ti Ise-r;ollol and. at fcImIll's optillrl. mav k, rrinat\cd hr "fe€linit at tiny time duririg thy'I'Crnl. Ldndl(trd CON ClIaMS and agl.:QS that no part c>1'thc Cunnnuni> ictiun Facility ca nStrc€ctccf, erected a€' 1lfuecd On 111c 111.e€16scs by'I cnalnt Will beconla:, or he CMssidcrcd al; b in,' afli\ecl to 1,1, ,t part of, the llremis", it h4ing. die Specific intention of the Latidlord (hal ,111 inlpl'ovcnlcnts of every kind and naltlrc ConStrtICMI, erceted 01, 1)1,1c'ed by "f'cnanr on the• Premises will he and ronin the properly of the I mnt anti lila' lx, relllovetl by Tenant at ally time during thc;Witbin une 11i€ndred tiventy (120) clays of the termination of this Agreement, Tenant evil l remove all Such inipr'ovenlenis. f=ootings. f«undations, and concrcle will he removed to it depth of one tiros 1,clow grade. (NO DEFAULT AND RICHT' TO CURE. (a) 71ic: f hiving will he deemed a default by'li mm and a broach oftllis AgmemerlL (i) non-papient of Rent if such rent remains unpaid for more than thirty (30) days atter receipt of %Nfritten notice of such failtu'e to pay from l_,alridl MI; or (if) Anamt's failure to perikinu any odwr turin or condition under this Agrecnleni %vithin forty-tivc (45) drays, after reveipt of written notice fronj Landlord specifying tliv fitllurc. No such failure, lio%yever, "ill he doomed to exist if `Icnmv IBIS C01111111`-tic'!.'CI 111 COW SLII•ll defaLlh 15'€tllill SL€C1) 1e;€'10d anld 1)€'OVided 011111 such efforts Ire pl•osecuted to compJction with reasonable. diligence.. Delay in etming a default \kri11 he excused if clue to causes beyond the roast:nablu control of, Tenant. If Tenarnl remains in detauh lwyond any uplliicathle eLne 11010d, Landlord kvill have the righl to exodse any and 01 dglits and romcdic°s ax atilahlc to 0 tinder low and a'cltanl In the' a.'1'em l..alndloid cicc l' , (o Ivullillille this, 1 eatic' (fill• it, as delaull l)% '101181-11. it shall holo 11, 011 SLabliccns4e conunitn)CIlk made b1'fc:nalnt tlm4yh dw cy4alion of,lhc 00,1-111 nfaan� .Such:unlnlit111cr11, 11 hying int:€laical flerchy 01,11 cak h such conlnlitnicnl shrill survive llle early termination aff This I.Va"c ilS lollg as Landlord 0111011ues to reccivc rental anti additional 1,0111 provided D'M-3 {tli)datcd 20101) c� ;�i�e ivalh(;. Ru_��ioha-Hrslliti� Ro�sC7 lir(' herein Ifunr a dMan;r al heron m car:lily WovilWd 0 x rising by I Blum €,, I.ancflc,rcl. f crt:rnt ,hall prm idL• I:rrndlr,rd �%riltell doC[llnL1nl:r(ion cStabliairing the iranle Mid addrr;, ofeirc}1 hieh ;il:o sets J6r1h Ilse (late said sub- licen�"ec'S conrrrlitilicrrl shtrll expire. The rights s,f a ,uh-Ii,�en,re Shall not cxceecl the rrLdlt, of•tht, Tenam us providcd herein, (b) 'I lic k)llmving "A he deemed a del'"rttlt by I_,rndlord and it bl'cai•la t11' this AyreernenL Landh,M hdhrc io perli,rm any lwrtal or condltrun Under this Arrccrnov within tortv-iivc (45) days ,ruler receipt of wrhlen notice from'l'enant spccifj!ing the flilurc. No such failure, 110W t-cr, Will he deemed to exist if 1_andlord has commenced to cure the &&'Milt Wilhirr such period and provided Stich effrarts t121 prosecuted to (:ornpletion with reasonable diligence. Delay ill (tiring a default wifl be excused if clue to causes beynnd the reasonable control of L111( lord. if Landlord remains in default beyond any applicable cure period, Tenant %vill have the right to exercise any and all rights available to it under law and c LIUi€y, including the right to cure Landlord's default and to dedu:t (lie costs of such cure f lum any monies due to Landlord from Tenant, (N) AS51GNI1IEWr/sUBLEASE. Landlord acknm0cdges that 'fcntant intends tel lciase, sub -lease, or license portions of to Communkm6mis Facility and premises to third party tC'IZC0)Iilr11111liCa1i0nS INovidcrs. Tenant SIM11 have the right to sublet or license this Agrecmeni. in whulc or in part, without the LandlmM consent. 1 mart shall hrtvc tic right to assign this A,"recnlent in Whnle or ill part. Xvithaxrt the Landlord's consent,' proWided, hoar n cr the Tenant AM Dive I_trntl oW written notice of such assignment. l_11 -ton notification tO Landlord of;an assignment. Tenant Nvill he rchAi %ed of all Iuture icrlcrrrlaancc. liabilities and obligations udder this A .lvcrllenl. I 'ImIj rd shall not h',Wc the right W a ,sign this Agreement til itlir.,ut the (Arsons ol'Tcnont. except prlrtitirrnl to ;1 holM fide ,ale' ol'tllc properly, (0) NO`]'ICES, lJlti'1-3 (updated 2010) .ale: iJam+: Ho.n�cal.r: lic,lh�o:: i�aciC.l SitF. tqt TN:;: VAROHR2 At nrrlices. deniands ;Ind C'F7lllmollic;I(low, horctlnder �� ill l)c° §Nen by liml cluss certified ur ruuklovd Illal isurn r�crillt rc�luc';t�t1. or A ;r rc•c0grliicd ovcrrli -'111 ct'�tui�'r. llostag, plc paid, ill be L'H'Ccti%T whcst prOperly tient alld received, rcluscd (WI C10 I'll Cd uIll ICIk red. Nutile• tit ill be ts, the Ilarties ilt tllc r ddiewn set AM A= ee ith Tenants hAng sent to Ow alim6on of Presiden( ;md or C)llrr,ldOnS 14,tnag0r. In additiiln, WWI shrill Wo scall a eop) of ally skich n[llicc let; (i) John V. Rtst Ill, At(orncy at L INN , I SOO l lctrper Road, l3ccf'ic). \fest Virginfrr 25,NO2: and (ii) Ally Lender of`Youarlt that has notified Landlord obits interesl h This Apreelnan E=_ dwr party hereto nvy Change the place 1i)r the: giving of notice to it by thirty (30) days prior writ(en notice to the other as provided herein. (P) CASUALTY. Landlord will prm ide notice to Tenant ni•any casualty affecting the Property Within fit peight (48) hours ofthe casualty. If any part of the A m mikation Facility or Prgxny is damaged by ire of odwr Casualty so as to render the Prerllises unsuitable, in Tenant's sole determirlatim, Tenant nwr tcltiWate. this Agrecrllonl by providing written notice to the Landlord, which termination will be. 01'e.ctive as of the date of sticll dasttage or destr►tctiorl, Upon such termination. Tcnrlrlt \00 be Wiled (o collect all inscn'ance proceeds payable to nnant on account thereof and to be reimbursed for ally prepai(l Roll. (Q) NVAIVBR OF LANDLORD'S IAEAS. Landlord herabY waives ,ln\ rald rill lien rights it play hrtM s1.11t tOry or othcr\� isc, conco-ning the Col I rtcility' or ally pot"troll 111lrcnl. 'I lle Cllllln111t11(:tWon l'acilit) shall be deemed pummal prat wQ, for pur uaw of €his Avreerllcrtt. I—Cpardless of'wholler atly portion is deemed real or personal properly under npplic,lble 1,'M. and h'.11Wlrlyd hrrchr 0011 Ilts to 1 to rcrllr}Vc �lil or ally porlion ofthe ( onlrnurlication 1 wilily. front time! to time in Tell'Int`s style di.seretion ,Incl NN'ithuut 1.011(110rd", Contieltl. DNI -3 I ulhoed 201 t)) SIW Name R,�ianul.e Hu_Ilfi s..Ri.> act Saks NuMluv; VAROH132 f12) TAXES. `f i'n(2nt" droll pa, ani pel';onal prq vny ta"es assessed u11, or oily pill -lion ",'such WW'. altrihmablc 2O, the (A nillunOti uh I',, die Landlord shAl pay A real pvojlcrt� unrs ,121(1 1211 o0m. tCeti and ,nsessmenl, uttributablc to the Prernis" and adjoining Properly or Iondlord. l'cnt ni. shall Ivry' nll� incicuse in Ltndlnrd" 1-Cal plvperl� tags directly a1MA)utt11}Ic and clrse tt) the CXititctic•e Ofthe ( 4127111711nk1'i1ttUI1S E'aClltt}', (5) CONDEMNATION. Notwithstanding any provision of the Lease to the contt'ar;v, in the event ct1 Colidemna€ion ofthe Prenlises, the Landlord and Tenant %ball be entitled to sgatow awards with respect to (lies Premises, in Ox amount dcte.2'mAd by the court conducting such condemnation prc)ceedillgs haled upas the landlord's and Tellan€'s respective inlerests in (lie. Premises. 11'a separate condemnation award is not detelmfled by such cow , Landlord shall permit Tenant to participate in the allocation and distr bmin ofthe awax& l!1 no even shall the corldemnadun mt'ard to Landlord exceed the I'll iill Pro ed value of the Premises, without taking irtto account the imprmmmems located thereon. and in no event Aull the Lune be terminated or modified (other than an abatement of ruilt) due to a casually or CuncEenlnation tr'11hOLlt the prior writron consent of Tenant. (T") i171SCEIA ANFOUS. (a) Amenclnlent: VV liver. This Agreement cannot be amendmi, 1110dificd Or rVN'iWd Unless dune in writing and Signed ley an authirrixcd 1gC1lt of (he° L_aruilord and all mdhoNzed agent of thc'l Tam, No Imm inion knay he %knived etccl)t in +vriting signed by brit€t palsies. (h) Of l_ellse, Fithcr will. at Ilnv link upon iifteen- t l ) Hely `s prim- \\ ritten notico from the witer, e.xceute. adoundedge and deliver tet Il1r othc°r a IVC01-da1111c' NIV) rik randunl 01 1-02r%c ill the 161'111 cutttChe(I hereto as F'-\hibit t:'. Fithc'r Ilar1} mai rrcc3rcl this rncrrl"llildt2m it[ an}'0111C- 111c. ill it.s a1h4t&l ' cliscrc°Iic,l1. DNI -3 (Llp& Cd 201(1) S;1cNall;C. Rcail[F.gr-11<<Ifui R�:1t1 ';T.'4wlibea VAROHR3 lei 13iii( .1n<I I3vnLCliI. I he #(-runs and t'onditions Culuaiutxl ill thi", %givcm m "01 run "ill dw f'aToly am! inure to the bcnc#iI ul'lht lrlt[ica. their 1'CsIICCtt1C IIcns. e\cclitUly. adlllinlstl'irtor>.held iIstillw" (d) 1'ntire A; recnwllt. Thi,;\grevnicnt omi tiw t=xhfhits zmat:lletl 1tC1v('1. all beim!, n Ili€rl lwrc'ot. Cljlltititlltl' the entire agleerilent +rfthe lklsrtic", I1Crel0 and "ill supe "ic all pow "nor, iniiiiatioris anc# agrcerllents. (t') M erring W. . This Agreement will be 1"ovC1.1led by the hi , oithe state in which the Prendscs are located. "Alkno regaiA to c riblets of lana. (I) Estoppel. h'ithcr party will. at any tinit upon fifteen { 15) days prior w'rit(en notice frilly the other, execute, acknowledge and deliver to the other a statenlent in writing (i) certifying that this Agreement is unn3odificd and in Bill We and effect (or, if inodihod, stating the nature ofsuch inodifieation and certifying this Agvernent, as so modified. is in full force and effect) and the: date to which the rent and althea charges are Maid in advance. ifany. and (ii) kick noN`Iedg,[ng that !!fe`l'l: 'ctrl' not. W st€Ch 17R1'ty s knowledge. any UnCUred definuhs, on the part of elle other party hCl'cunder, or specrfyrng smh defaults €f ny me claimed. Any such statement may be conclusively relied upon by ally prospective purchaser or mwurnbrancer of the !'remisew failure to deliver such a statement within such time will be conclusive upon the; requesting, party that (i) this Agmemem is in Rd! force and MO. without modification except as tilay be properly €-Cpresc€tted by the rt:yucsting party. (ii) thcrC arc. no illlCUNd defaults in either party's performance. -lmd {iii) nig more than one mlMs rent has been Ililid in advanee. 0) LENDER'S RIGHTS. to) f_andhwd hcrvb. conscnt4. to the grant 01',t dCCd crt'trutit cnClntlha'.rin r the l cmint's interest in Ow l.Cilsl� and all (tit' I cllunt's personal prolwrty and fixtures ,Iltitched to tllc real properly described herein. Landlord will altorn Io any nmogage of 7 crianl. In ih,' Cvcni I ender heeoulcs (he sueccssor or assignee of 'I t'rlant h) i'or"Iusurc or through an) other nlcalls. I.alldlord shed) rccogni c l N13 (lIi3(latc'll NYI01 1.'} Sive- Mjfnbi:v VAROHR Icllcfe'r a, such sucuohm,r or zesgo of s'e'al€lt %i, ithout thc mets of all) p;rrt) to ionsent ill ht cxkeCHR' ailsf ll-1her inStrtlrlleIM', 1i Ith IVNJ)Ce'1 10 SUCh 161't'CIt15lnVe OF aStilpinuent, or to make sllc'II Stlt'CeSSIn lel' wSSil(?Il€ IC]lI C'tleCtiVi2 and 1)indillg lilllltl WMA (h) Landhq-d ackno" IctIgi s that Al ani must obtain priest' %t'rittetl omsent from Ix. llder in urdCr to ( i ) arrlend tlse I.Case, if such an)CIIdnlent 4Soil ld I11,1terialIy incrC;Ise tlu harden Of I rn;lnt culdc•r the Kars, or ZRIVCrsel� Ilf'eCt Icrlder''s CCUI'il� inlerest ill the lease: (ii) surrender the Lease: or (iii) cancel or terminate the ]_ease. unless duu to an ev 111 ol,def<rult by Tenaill. and provided 111a1 Lcndcr has received notice af'dCfault as pnn ided herein. and such d0huh re nAns uncumd Act, expiration of the applicable Cure period. M In the Cvc 11 of defirull by Tenant. Landlord shall give prompt written notice Vereot'to Lander at such address as Lender nmy indicate by native herenfier to Landlord in \vriting and lender shall have the right (but not the ohlivation) to cure such default within flihi)' (30) days fi)llo�OnE! Lender's receipt Of'SLICIt notice; art(] Landlord shall not take any action with respect to such default, including, \vitholut limitation, any action intended (o terminale the: Lease or Tenant. tenancy or possession thereunder, for the floregoing thin-ty (30) day period, alter Lenders receipt ol'such \vritten notice, provided. hcAvever. If such dentult is not cured within the f'bregoing thirty (30) day period, such thirty (30) day period shall he deemed to he extended a reasonable period ofAnc to cure nwh WA. provided Lender has commeticecl the erre of such elcfauh m ithirl said tllAy (30) d,1y period, Without limiting the knegoing. 1,an lkwd agrees that no event elf defi11111 and no tenilination csr surranclo'r Of llle ],.Case Shall be C11'ektivc Unless notice shall first have been Own to Moos set Wh W e.. L,ln hwd fon-thcr ap.rees that if the ]_case is terminated for 011)` re'd SOn, including" TOW limitation. hec;ruw of the hltnkruptc) tet' irlsolvellc� of "I Cnant, LCrlder shrill have the option (upon \c riMC) IIOUCe to L;lndlord) to CDtcr into ,I I)CW pPrtluncl lease \.ti ith Landlord can stlhnntially the ,IIn1e terms as dw I n se air the thc'11 rCmaininp Icrill (pilus all) DN43 (updated 210) 14 5,€c id.,nz F (I iz l{lijL-}iaihlls_i?g?i( i Sift Wp.iN,r. VAROHR2 (i(€ RM; lis renew) li€IImL ing the lcrmillation fi. L;tn(Pord Or the rejection of the 1.r15(by h€srlkrulttcy lrustl•r_ (Ll) In the LtLrli l Girder hLe(mies l COMIt'.s ,u0ce,s0I' (ir ussi„111 lincler tllc I c€r;c € s s,peci f ied Ihov c, Lender or its direct sl]eces,(:r, or ]r.signs ,hall not be ( i ) Bahl(.• till. any action or omission ol'thc Tenant under the I elisc, other than the pati'111011 ofrCilt clue rotcler the I_Cast it' Lender Lxcrciscs its right, (In&I, subsection Ic) ahove, nr (ii) bound by any € nwndment or modilieaticm ofdic Lease made \Nithout l'ender's mk unix \%ri(ten consent ]1 required by subsection (b). (c) :NoiWithstanding anything to the Contrary set follh in the Leas(:, landlord hereby "whTs any comractual and/or statutory liens With respect to the property of Anlmt or Tenant's subtenants, s WCO;sors or assigns, hICILrding Lender, from time to time located whhin or upon the Promises. (1) The lerol "Lend,er" shall iilelucie. the successors and assigns of I.ender- and any folorc leasehold mortgagee of tenant. including, but ]lot lintiled to any person who acquires the `l•enuni's interest under Be Lease pursuant to a Icuecl Bmv of the deed of ML Atte leasehold mortgagee (and that pentni's successors anti assigns) who acyuires the Oilan& interest un&r the Lease pursualtt to a IclrcclosurG or pursuant to an assignmerI t Urn bender shall be entitled to all tights of Lender hereLtnder, (g) !.older shall have the 1'iglll to assign its interest in the f.e€tse ,vithotil to c:onseitt of'Landlord: provided, howcvmc that Lender shall Wvc I-Andlord pro]llpt written notice of any such assignment. €.Ipon acceptance ofst]ch assignmenl by I_ender•'s assignee. Lender shltll he reletlsed f i•om tin( ftrrthel liability under the Lease as (If' tile date ofsuch assigilmerlt. (h) I-rrndlord shall. within ten ( 10) days alio writien dcllland f -Orn Lender or'1•emmlc delker to WRILr a ecrlilicatc rc-slitting the rlultters set 161.111 herein. €u1Ll loch other matters 1•s:latcd to the Validity and cnfilr(.eabiIII)' of[he Lrisc. as rc IS(sn,ihjy rquested by I ruder ol- ` vIliult. D.NJ-3 (LipdaWkI ?erred 13 Silt Name.Ro na. ,_ l�rliir7 Rsi,:�e'r Site Nkinl€n VAROHR2 - - (i) I_unillord aIcAlloc+lc,dgcti tial nw doing contained Itc.rcin shall be dcellicd tEr eilnsIrued to AIivatz €he I -ender It, take ria\ ac:tion.S under the I-CaA' or to 1. perl mi (w dischargc any obligations. duly or liabihl� tit''I en<rnI under the I-ur5c. (1) In the event that there is a lion against I.aurdlord's prcqpc, I arnllltll'l1 €ckwwIcKs INH Ihely is alien against the propwo .incl «ill work Ali the I enwd in nhtaini, a Sul,orclir}ation and Non-disrudwicc Agre.cmcnt Prima the Lender. I fat ar3)' tirne after the darts; ol'this Agrccntenl, IAndlord rceervcs a bona III& written offer from n third puny seeking an assignment of the rental stream arssoeiated with this Agreement (either at Chart tirrrL or in the future) (hercinafter ..Rental Stream Otf'er"). Landlord shall immediately furnish 'Tenant with a copy cif' We Rental Strewn Offen. Tenant shall have the right within twenty (20) days after it receives such copy and representation to match the Rental Strcaan-r Ofkr and a� rrec in wailing to mach Tc turns of the Rental Strea3rn Offer, Such writing stroll be in the form of a contraO suhslaantially Similar to the Rental Stream Offer. if 'tenant chooses not to exercise this right or fails to provide written notice of' Landlord within the twenty (20) duy period set forth herein, Landlord miry assign tlrc rental. Strcata3 pursuant to the Rental Stream Offer, subject to the tents ofthis Agr'eemc nt. (W) ADDITIONAL DOCUNJEI NTS. The Partics hereto argue to sign any rind all documents necessary to carry ow the intents and purposes of this Option and Lease Agreement. DN1 3 tgWawd 20101 16 Site Name: Rnanake-Holrin5 Road Site Number: VAROHR2 IN WITNESS NVIIEREOF, the• ltndcrsigned has caused this Agvet:ment to be executed this I day of .. `` �� 20 14. Landlord: Mistele Declaration of Trust William H. Mistcle,Trustee INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF I' ;;; r COUNTY OF f,i .:t,.. , to -wit: BF, IT REMEMBERED, that on this . -•. l day of ? .� .2014. }}'�' } ` j' personally appeared before me, tieing duly .. _— r11 r!� at � .. J f ' diff r S�4rf.lifl on }jE5 oath, deposed and made proof to my satisfaction that he is (lie person(s) nariied ill tite within instrullicrtt; and 1, having first made known to him the contents thereof, acknowledge that he signed, scaled and delivered the same as his voluntmy act and decd fbr the purposes therein conlained. My Commission l"xpires: DN,1-3 (updated 2010) '1 f Nolary Public t7 krullu In Uattd B Mi'f'IuIc Si1c Narm` Ki .umkc 111410t, lZ,,,pl I huhland TnnciS 1. If Siw l lrnhcl, VAIL]1I1;2 1't 1Whilemid ruui3 lin'tan LL'L' 'SS(ll 111NANT: IJIGUY,AND TONVERS, LL(, / )avid B. A1cCLus "President Y Limited Liability Compare.), A«rknowledgcrr tent STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, COU NTY OF R.ALElGI-I: I CERTIFY that on `6,� 2014, David B. MCCIure personally Cal1Te before me and aeknowledged under oath that he: (a) is the President of Highland 'towers, LLC. the limited liability company named in the attached instrument, (b) is authorized to execute this instrument on behalf'ofthe company and (c) GNmited Ilhe instrument as the reel of the company. Notary Public My Commission Expires: 'VVl\/�\i\I\,.'-.r V`1: haOPFIML �'i`�8�.✓'.i6�dr\9�.L�a9i:M.T'� SEA, NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WEST VIAGMIA DIANA 41+ WOHN - - 125 WH)TESTICIt 1ZbAG BBCKLEY.LLrV251lgt My Commiaslon Explrr; Apr. 21.2(1?3 � Site «;'rs,e i:�;,E ui,4 1'talciri5 R i5l Sire Ntirslar, VAROHR7 IBXIIlBlT A (Description of Property) Copy of Recorded Deed Cop), 01''I'm Ticket EXHIBIT B (Description of the Premises) Drawing And/or Actual Survey EXHIBIT C Memorarrdrrni of Lease DW (opaimod 20 10) 19 R111101 t-i I)J%td13 AILCIwr Iliphland -1aur,., 1.H 125 Whhvc ]ic<, rk Kaci EXHIBIT A Site, Romlokc-1iolliris Roacl 2 'I'mver Site Property Site Descrlplloll Site Nana Lgo.rjo ,rfisrliins,kt rad Silt' NiIIIII, v. VAROHE — This site is located on a portion of the Mistele Declaration of Trust properly, Map 39 Parcel 09-01- 07.00-0000, Instrument Number 200604785, located in Tinker Creek 'fax District, Roanoke County, 5119 Hollins Road, Roanoke Virginia such site is a certain portion of the tract of property more particularly described below and as spawn on Exhibit B attached hercto. lax Parcc l Viewer rage 1 of, TI W201 � Data use subject to license. x 6' Detc,rrne. DeLorrne To Pc USAF, 7,0.-- wem.delorme.com LNX-4514DS-VTM • Partners • Resources (/Resources/) • Thinking Ahead (/ThinkinciAhead/) • Login _membership/default.aspxl • Choose Lancjuaae Page 2 of 6 Home J Product Catalog /Product-Catalo Wireless (/Product-CatalogNVirelessb (/catalog/imagesCache/0000036/t006 r08747 v5.ipg) UU ro 91 ro �j (addtoproiect.aspx?id=27177&company=andrew)LNX-4514DS-VTM v - w u_ Andrew® Antenna, 698-896 MHz, 450 horizontal beamwidth, RET compatible • Broadband, providing future -ready single antenna for application in 700 MHz and existing 850 MHz cellular operation • Air dielectric design provides superior PIM performance with repeatable antenna -to -antenna gain and pattern consistency • Single piece radome provides long term mechanical stability • Proven core design technology, with over 1,000,000 similar antennas deployed • Specifically designed to have physical dimensions similar to most existing cellular antennas http://www.commscope.com/catalog/andrew/product_details,aspx?id=27177 1/6/2016 LNX-4514DS-VTM Page 3 of 6 Specifications(product details.as x?id=27177 Related Products (product details,aspx?id=27177&tab=2) Documents/Tools (product detalls.aspx?id=27177&tab=3) Electrical Specifications Frequency Band, MHz 698-806 806-896 Gain, dBi 15.5 16.4 Beamwidth, Horizontal, degrees 47 45 Beamwidth, Vertical, degrees 17.3 15.8 Beam Tilt, degrees 2-18 2-18 USLS, typical, dB 16 15 Front -to -Back Ratio at 1800, dB 32 28 Isolation, dB 30 30 VSWR I Return Loss, dB 1.4 1 15.6 1.4 1 15.6 PIM, 3rd Order, 2 x 20 W, dBc -153 -153 Input Power per Port, maximum, 500 500 watts Polarization 1450 J-450 Impedance 50 ohm 50 ohm General Specifications Antenna Brand Antenna Type Band Brand Operating Frequency Band Performance Note FVj Andrew@ DualPo18 Single band DualPol@ I Teletilt@ 698 - 896 MHz Outdoor usage http://www.commscope.com/catalog/andrew/product details.aspx?id=27177 1/602016 LNX-4514DS-VTM Page 4 of 6 Mechanical Specifications Color Light gray Lightning Protection do Ground Radiator Material Aluminum Radome Material Fiberglass, UV resistant RF Connector Interface 7-16 DIN Female RF Connector Location Bottom RF Connector Quantity, 2 total Wind Loading, maximum 586.4 N @ 150 km/h 131.8 Ibf @ 150 km/h Wind Speed, maximum 241 km/h 1 150 mph Dimensions Depth 163.0 mm 1 6.4 in Length 1308.0 mm 1 51.5 in Width 389.0 mm 1 15.3 in Net Weight 13.3 kg 1 29.3 Ib u Remote Electrical Tilt (RET) Information w Model with Factory LNX-4514DS-AIM Installed AISG 2.0 Actuator v LL w RET System Teletilt@ Packed Dimensions Depth 300.0 mm 11.8 in Length 1780.0 mm 70.1 in http://www.commseope.com/catalog/andrew/product_detaits.aspx?id=27177 1/6/2016 LNX-4514DS-VTM Width Shipping Weight Patterns- Show 545.0 mm 1 21.5 in 24.8 kg j 54.6 Ib Regulatory Compliance/Certifications Agency Classification ISO 4001:2008 Designed, manufactured and/or distributed under this quality management system Included Parts Page 5 of 6 DB380 Pipe Mounting Kit for 2.4"-4.5" (60-115mm) OD round members on wide panel antennas. Includes 2 clamp sets and double nuts. DB5083 Downtilt Mounting Kit for 2.4"-4.5" (60 - 115 mm) OD round members. Includes a heavy-duty, galvanized steel downtilt mounting bracket assembly and associated hardware. This kit is compatible with the DB380 pipe mount kit for panel antennas that are equipped with two mounting brackets. COMMSCOPF ABOUT US U) Ethics (/Abc)ut-Us/Cor orate -Responsibility -and- (/ABOUT- Sustainability/Ethics/) US/WHO-,WE- Privacy (/About-Us/Privacy/) ARE Cookies (/About-Us/Cookies/) Terms (/About-Us/Terms/) Feedback (/feedback) NEWS CENTER (/NEWSCENTER) Events bttp://www.commscope. com/catalog/andrew/product_detaits.aspx?id=27177 1/6/2016 Careers (/About- (/NewsCenter/Events/)Cust om r 06001O Us_Careers Info rc�a hics- Support Su Corporate NewsCenter/Infoarap ort ics htt : e Partner Locator In the News Us/Corporate- Partners Partner- © 2015 All Rights Reserved.NewsCenter Responsibility -and- NewsItems acator Sustainability/) Media Contacts Sales Locator ((NewsCenter/MedlaCon ac s olr/SalesWizart Press Kit Services bttp://www.commscope. com/catalog/andrew/product_detaits.aspx?id=27177 1/6/2016 LNX-4514DS-VTM Timeline (/About - Us Who-We- Are/Timeline/) Page 6 of 6 (/NewsCenter/PressKit&Support/Services/) Press Releases Technical uNewsCenter/Press ReiS it Investor Relations (/Sunport/Technical- (http://1r.commscoi)e.com) Su ort Management Team About- Us/Management- Tea m Supplier Responsibilit (/About-Us/Corporate- Responsibility, -and- Sustainabilitv/Supolier- Responsibility/) ,)�ICPJ*13053344jU-1 Training L/Supno rt/Tra in i ng/) http://www.commscope.com/catalog/andrew/product details.aspx?id=27177 1/6/2016 +J 2 M c O 0 x w NJ p w G o w � o w e � 0 u S/5 � u o rTi T u _ Q n`g C W w �v�4ciF o p,n tn cD vi u¢ F otw o ro rn °=t°y O� O O O° qr'j y .moi N w � u T. ti � •F7 13 ca•a� 2 ��L���w0 �' � � ° a ° � o� o t ¢ a Zh- � ^a ro ro v� � C ,may; � '7 yfl�.+ � � a+ R A ° v� •0 � O � d [ O' H j"j'� �iq U 6 -dq N •-w• > V O Edi ° G �t �S uBtC 3 q a >a �Qp4 c c .�° �'EQ�U s WW Z U a. �, yr to per., c a R. CY •° roy 5 W o pp pap q? 40 0 Qw% ,o y o o ,°, �'a ❑"v p U oa4 z nom, °op d o A W W >Z zA".]� , b�zC FzZ 4. W ZZ a � � b L IN U pO�j p ty O O W to •«. C cn � y w° 04 o o VJ U j F E _ v V'oot al 4d R n 'rf LC w w •tea G b V az"'2 > > z u`uu�' 0 un k d ° 'I ,u u O ip Z C '� y w m •� w 3 3 W 3 -O ro u aiG4 oAQ .6n roi �a u .0. Z F +� V •`�.. 'C 'C S 'H Z w a+ 17 p v�vsUU U 0 rs I-i3w¢ +J 2 M O w NJ o � o w e � u S/5 rTi T u � RC •� Q n`g C W w �v�4ciF I rr4r3 �'r�j f� -cc �' r 1 1f= .. CT 1 { + ., `ricr, A rf Ar ' o,0037 Nk N='�11rY t .M cliff' ,� �� � r - T t �'?', �� � I' � + ;'• � � ^. �' Qp1 1f141. 4 r; 1`�r J - ii74ti y , 1t,' +•w` � '�i�. }l� `j �� 1 r % '+� 't ��', �� .�- / :�. � 605.- • ii �.a � �a! tr• r �I� '! � � '. � tr .r� 1, ���. JIulllns��s •'� �'• V 'i{h, ' C �� of l • 'fL�:4 � t. � Ftu he'ir�tu � � ,� � a r `.. ��+, \ ' 1Snrn {u•tvlrSr ` 1 I IN r ' ToL o, kstorle � { Lj l •. � l CeCI , ti t !r �I'�r •e ,rf \1e •rsi•ial ��`, �� I ./rJ 4 ,'0.50 Miles •�l� 4. ..L.: .! 4�! �'r �Y��i-fS 1 � `� ] ,. ( r. (`{jlil �/I rr r A �i _��� � � �'. �� �r ��.� o. A�7rurll:rin Vr - � t \.� r�. � :y .��,� \S�� if' 4,�� �,-,'• r �ai;�,�yr. $ rvgp fr i� ��r rig•, .( �,� f• Irk �jf% �,,r rl + � ��• � `` 4 � {`+'r VVI j .,., ��\ /��' •'I 1 • Yr f � �� `114 `r 4/- �J� � r �� � '�I,�. �. `, • \ ` I� I ! t r y ri t• ! it /� j (f j ,{, 1 � i .. - . r• 1 r� II � 14 »•X `i �r� ,. _. �,, r ` � • `2� I � * �-a '� a�. o �E •,� � I � t e i',r • ff���� �' f� ,1 � � Off/ � i�i .t � !t J 'i-' '� � ) ��•�. . I .'fu ,., �,.. `. '�ic�l• �—` 'r T'�%�` � �r�Jl. �'• 1 r , r �11in 'l� •I'� `CJ 4.1� I ` i, �i.{�. ,! J�P \ `1. \V rl � 4 Y 4,\�` '<�� /i n' ' �\ - � � _. � ' , I� yr ��r. 1 ,,rte � -p 3 � ��,� I� l✓`�'' �(7�`,fr .. 1!� �,tt' .., 6Pi r r �. j-• ( r � y` ��•-. r _. t �i� �f. r (.,.� �� , � ��r((( , i���"'w, �...• ` • I J � .t � r11F�� 't ��� � 73�871�� _�� - .-��� i1 ri �. \,/ R �►', Y{iful�f�r —1 Slti - L`~' I �tr �`{a 1rb\\\` t:`` ortsrll> hl }.ki ,fel �y is — t `.' I ' - � 1 ���J � -. •` i �� i f' �i) I A .�%"� 1 E�"�� K-'r � -i tlr f/. �• t .. i '•�� �(f/ y1: /� J4(j'�',�. .sem' fr `'Gr r �) /�.1� I 1 i' `� i11� ,.. I .l'� i ••�'_ r=i i ��\ f \_/ ,: • D 1�-,�ry �-! Avg' � / � r r • i' � `}�\'f , �" —?y�,• yyy}'' r ' .[r • •1 �'( � � ' r r '` r � (r e y ' ��! r , r ' � ; /! 7 / /� i � ,,1�x - '�.� �.)' �,� � •+r : • Ila rrhfuu I"it, 11 _ t t• •, 1�+ r - r +j/}r\ i,- c If�t�I /IIS! Declination AVE r 01 04 r{etittnc AVE s— 4. yTurt� ° r (ivIf XI rA r+ y,;' ' / � : 1 Ilnlfrir. ctrl y/ rulF Cf � �✓ // �J � �lGorC.200 Oft qPb `- 281°W 200D-D1r 5 0 �1 Map Name: ROANOKE Scale: 1 inch =2,000 ft. Date Published: 1963 State Name: VA Horizontal Datum: NAD83 Print Date: 07/15/15 Date Photo Revised: 1984 CONTRACT OF SALE THIS CONTRACT of sale made and entered into this day of 2016, by and between the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, its successors or assigns, party or parties of the first part, hereinafter referred to as "Seller," and RICHARD H. MACHER, or its assigns, party or parties of the second part, hereinafter referred to as "Purchaser." WITNESSETH: NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual promises, covenants, and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. PROPERTY: The Seller agrees to sell and the Purchaser agrees to buy all that certain lot, tract or parcel of land, together with any improvements thereon, rights incident thereto, and appurtenances thereunto belonging, situate in the County of Roanoke, Virginia, and more particularly described as follows: All that certain tract or parcel of land, together with any improvements thereon, rights incident thereto, and appurtenances thereunto belonging, situated in the Town of Vinton, Virginia, and more particularly shown and designated as 1.27 acre parcel located at 800 Washington Avenue, Vinton, Virginia 24179, Tax Map Number 60.16-06-32.00-0000 THIS BEING all of the same real estate conveyed to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County by deed from the Town of Vinton, Virginia, dated November 20, 1968 (Deed Book 876 Page 60). Hereinafter referred to as the "Property." 2. PURCHASE PRICE: The total purchase price for the Property is Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ($700,000.00), which is payable to Seller as follows: (A) Purchaser shall deliver to Poe & Cronk Real Estate Group, Inc., ("the "Seller's Agent") the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) (hereinafter referred to as the "Deposit") which shall be deposited into the Seller's Agent' non-interest bearing Escrow Account within (1) one business day following the approval of Contract by the Board of Supervisors of 1 Roanoke County, Virginia. The Deposit shall be applied to the Purchase Price at closing or returned to the Purchaser in the event the Conditions (see below) have not been satisfied or waived by Purchaser; the Deposit shall be applied at Closing (see below) to the Purchase Price. (B) The balance of the Purchase Price shall be paid to Seller at Closing by Certified Check or its equivalent. 3. CONDITIONS: Purchaser shall have sixty (60) days following 14+e appfev�i4thc approval of this Contract of Sale by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as a due diligence period to examine the Property and, at the Purchaser's sole expense, complete any reviews, tests, studies, surveys, inquiries, and/or investigations the Purchaser deems necessary, to include the examination of documents and records of the Property. If, prior to the expiration of the due diligence period, the Purchaser determines in its sole discretion that the Property is not feasible for its intended use, the Purchaser may withdraw from this Contract of Sale, its Deposit shall be immediately returned, and this Contract of Sale shall become null and void. If no notice to withdraw is given prior to the expiration of the due diligence period, then the Property shall be deemed acceptable to the Purchaser, and finalization of the Contract of Sale shall proceed. 4. CLOSING: The consummation of the sale and purchase of the Property (the "Closing") pursuant to the Contract of Sale shall occur at a time and location to be determined by Buyer on a date mutually acceptable to Seller and Buyer, but no later than the thirtieth (30th) day after the expiration of the Contingency Period. 5. TAXES: Real estate and other taxes, water, sewer, and other customary charges shall be apportioned pro rata on a per diem basis between the Seller and the Purchaser as of the date of Closing. The Seller shall be responsible for preparation of the deed, payment of the tax imposed pursuant to the provisions of Section 58.1-802 of the Code 2 of Virginia, 1950, as amended, payment of any other taxes properly payable by the Grantor/Seller, and payment of the Seller's attorney's fees, if applicable. Except as otherwise specifically provided herein, all other costs and recordation fees incurred in connection herewith shall be the responsibility of the Purchaser. 6. TITLE TO PROPERTY: The Seller shall deliver to Purchaser a good and sufficient deed for the Property at Closing, conveying to Purchaser title with SPECIAL WARRANTY and free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, easements, conditions, and restrictions, except as otherwise specifically provided herein or as Purchaser may, at its option, waive in writing. Seller represents and warrants that Seller has no knowledge of any reason or circumstance that would prevent Seller from conveying such title. If a defect is found which can be remedied by legal action within a reasonable time, Seller shall, at Seller's expense not to exceed $1,000.00, promptly take such action as is necessary to cure the defect. If the Seller, acting in good faith, is unable to have such defect corrected within sixty (60) days after written notice of such defect is given, or is unable to have such defect corrected at a cost not to exceed $1,000.00 and Seller elects not to expend additional sums for such correction, then Purchaser may, at its option, either (i) terminate this Contract, in which event the Purchaser shall be entitled to the return of the Deposit, shall have no obligation to purchase the Property, and this Contract shall be null and void, or (ii) waive the foregoing rights and enforce its rights to acquire the Property as provided herein. The parties may extend the date for Closing by mutual agreement in order to comply with the requirements of this paragraph. 7. RISK OF LOSS: All risk of loss or damage to the Property shall remain on the Seller until the date of Closing. In the event of substantial loss or damage to the Property or its building or improvements prior to Closing, Purchaser shall have the option of either (i) terminating this Contract and recovering the Deposit, or (ii) affirming this Contract, in which 3 event Seller shall assign to Purchaser all of Seller's right under any policy or policies of insurance applicable to the Property and pay over to Purchaser any sums received as a result of such loss or damage. 8. RIGHT OF ACCESS: Purchaser and/or its agents, employees, or assigns, shall be entitled to enter the Property throughout the due diligence period for the purpose of conducting any and all desired or required engineering and land surveys, and for other tests, studies, examinations, and inspections as it deems necessary and appropriate. However, Purchaser shall not unreasonably interfere with Seller's use of the Property and shall endeavor to provide Seller advance notice of intended entries onto and activities upon the Property. In the exercise of privileges granted by this paragraph, Purchaser shall substantially restore the Property to its original condition upon completion of such testing or engineering work and shall be responsible for all loss, damage, or expense directly arising from or attributable to Purchaser's use of the Property or entry thereon prior to Closing. 9. REAL ESTATE COMMISSION: Seller and Purchaser acknowledge that they have dealt with no real estate brokers with respect to the transaction contemplated in this Contract of Sale, other than Poe & Cronk Real Estate Group, Inc., and its agents Matthew R. Huff and Bryan Musselwhite, who are serving as the Seller's Agents, and Thalhimer, and its agent Barry Ward, who is serving as the Purchaser's Agent. Upon Closing, the Broker shall disburse from the Seller's proceeds a sales commission equal to six percent (6%) of the Purchase Price to be divided equally among the Purchaser's and Seller's Agents. The Seller's and Purchaser's Agents shall not have any claim to a real estate commission until Closing of the Contract of Sale occurs. 10. DEFAULT: In the event Seller neglects or fails to comply with the provisions and covenants herein, Purchaser shall be at liberty to seek remedy in specific performance. In 11 the event of Purchaser's default, Seller shall retain the full amount of the Deposit as liquidated damages. 11. APPROVAL: This Contract, and the terms contained herein, is subject to approval by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. In the event that this Contract is not approved by the Board of Supervisors, Seller shall promptly provide notice of same to the Purchaser, at which time Seller shall return the Deposit to the Purchaser and this Contract shall become null and void, and neither party shall have any further rights or obligations in relation thereto. 12. MISCELLANEOUS: (A) The County of Roanoke shall support a rezoning of the Property from its current Residential Business classification to accommodate the Purchaser's intended use as a full service restaurant and a future variety of expanded businesses. (B) No waiver of any breach of covenants or conditions herein shall be construed as a waiver of a covenant or condition itself or any subsequent breach thereof. The paragraph headings appearing in this Contract are for purposes of each reference and shall not be considered a part of this Contract or in any way to modify, amend, or affect the provisions hereof. (C) This Contract represents the entire Contract between the parties and may not be modified or changed except by written instrument executed by the parties. This Contract shall be construed, interpreted, and applied according to the law of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, personal representatives, successors, and assigns of the parties. (D) Purchaser accepts the Property in an "AS IS" condition acknowledges and agrees that Seller makes no representation or warranties with respect to the Property. Purchaser agrees that Purchaser is taking the Property, including the building and 5 improvements, without any warranties or representations from the Seller and that Purchaser has had sufficient opportunities to fully examine the Property, including the building, and that Purchaser shall comply with all environmental and other laws in renovating the building, including the proper removal of any asbestos and lead paint on the Property, and any surplus personal property remaining in the building. (E) This Contract is executed in duplicate, with each having the effect of an original, one of which shall be provided to each of the parties hereto. 13. The promises in this Contract and obligations of the Purchaser shall survive closing and be incorporated into the deed. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Contract as of the date set forth in the first paragraph of this Contract. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA By: Its: RICHARD H. MACHER By: Its: State/Commonwealth of City/County of I, , do certify that the foregoing Contract was acknowledged before me this day of 2016 by or assigns. He/she is personally known to me or has produced identification. Notary Public Registration Number: My commission expires: 6 State/Commonwealth of City/County of I, 1 do certify that the foregoing Contract was acknowledged before me this day of 2016 by of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, on behalf of the Board. He/she is personally known to me or has produced identification. Notary Public Registration Number: _ My commission expires: 7 u 4 M00 E; 1iW� m X Z p rc 0 Q af Zcli� (no M z _j o W VI j in En U W D 32 C7 a �' o Y N Luow W Z O F- tnjP F U 0 mZ II w W o o Z If) ±(, 04 ai to �:; m ''' W a a o ¢ © ¢ W-, m z z ¢ o a o a to F) in n- m a Ill J >wLl� W 00U.��Qp �aa N o0o¢ ;;l < Z-1oM2 ¢ ILINM W �zIll ZN� Z:5 oN-2p� -1 0 6 w n a. IIx 0W -zaZU�M LLa Q0 bmf>�°m ¢onW�i z00 11j w�0- �o�a Ill w 0� Ix ¢¢ 0 3: 0 WWzIrOUENDo eco —zz WNa ¢ � 2m U m , Q aWa _jF-LUQz0-0 u3laLt LL, VF^©U°` G�EyOupi�ZCl MR fflW¢��i ac-F...mr� W qO 0wnaw� jo-j It uOf-6I--¢-joU. o IEB CIVNi 3NOZ MnOS VA U) } Lj l- O Ow cn wza luz f= 2 WU)w0W Lifw a J =� ,,•zmrnz E W o a w w F- 0 2 � �"n Z �lnQ�a�V3F m ¢ VwLLama W0�C7 o Ill o] m� �UUr pp,,azC} FMIWI LF��e ,CD z zC)MI Nam�tnmz ml WLL0=l1mw�Iaaw DaW0¢I°u�az°0L" zQ�amaozpw 4O I_ gzwzn,nmO<mw 5O km—w¢wzow-m�w m-jw U=5�Wzw �0Zs F -Z Z < W � F =0: LLP 0 0 Z m 0 zo�Ozd�� F-Owui OLL�zj��UoaozZQ aw <i:�W ozpin -p—.0 2LLOMF- OW:O���cVw y w O 0 000>1 -DO- 00 =zwQ'- mzu�omin c9C9y5""w[7 wpm v� zwQZ F--ZWWN WC'J— U} ZO KWLL j UZw WGCOp!"�(97af0:r ��Um�mpOzrwzm 062a 0LL; W,wF0w16 Uu¢lazdMZO—M�z�F-a vla a z W W � 0 0 U Z W W a o a � w W O Ir N S V) w o r � x u) Z F- �Jfn} W Z LULU ¢WZW LL Ii¢u�.a ig00>00 L YaILI Ill in (D W UUf¢J) Z�Z wo wLL0 le w0mo WFOOc¢mwwg m. 000t-N40Wz --A wz�- 0 OW I-• wW of 02� 0: =pazVAow ��rawawcalia W�B.m0UU aQclw¢w�w two_Jo(nN� ag a��10 Z z 81 a� LO 0 a a U-1 N N woJaz w8m�F-F-W W N Z W W O p¢QW DZ� il0z w0: � WELOmJm�W R-,zA0 d' o co O� co o)= N S a � co ¢z V �� `Q 00 uJ a w ¢LLm Zt9 L O Z L o�a�zzwr¢a¢am w r a zw� aw�Oz ° UWj(DQLUW;Na o awmFFLLM�LL m WMOZ) .-OaLCO z z0O(nNi W a5(0z0 W Wz ¢(7r z on -Lu w z W W Z O L Q P wS Q U O z m W (1wt-ucj w Z mz-lzll�wp z¢u,-Z=&iF Fa z �' 00 oZaOrwn •-°'�t2 v 6m�om�` wn50L WZ60 TOQ•lQO.T sr m...l W QQr¢H co zu..ak �D 10¢aon► � Q¢z�`oN zQ> u�lugl °RzMO©�ogwg� oa ILL 00aZwpaLL. LL WF-ONW<XgM..tQQ00 LL M Ou� �ryc?¢v-j¢�erntiLuDF-Va UOM��ZZ LL U LL co) Lu to OZ; ~FQ-j L) C7LLI 0 wmoo~ z ¢ ' NO�LIWOZ 0 97 y . �.... ZZZ \� ,..I ill Z6 f r LU L ,❑_ ^y ua�r aN co N CO _.LZsa 9-1 0 m=a a r« _.ra \ƒ §A � � t� !2 )CL \0 \ f9}] k $ & § Ri E \ ] / / k 19 �$ k / e Bf \2 § §p zQ m2 m 16 .0 LM E ar ro G ro 0 a C 0 0 K 0: W o U N m •c O c = ro o C a rra�s O C C) .o o S C 0 0 O Z O O LL Z CL Z W W J a W C � N O N N C U C01 U a0 3 = U co W m N •Q t0 N w a m N co _ 0 N E N 06 47 a M v E 0 c J-- O C 3 y o - N O C v�oaCi A Y 'M N E0 m l m E Et 0 -0 N T] _ t O C 0 € V c 0 C )0E E m s u N w Ea to I I ti r °i 0 = O N �-• N m (6 N G 2 U o � L U m a C m CL o O I roe1 n .N 0 in E +o 16 o L 0 N r- O q) U d) o �c!y haw U (j I L El CL Co 7 Q. y aow N E U, W V m m m 0 cr � ci O U N o m a) M O M a 4) Cp N U) N '' a ro d ro -t c U m U) al C� 0 a m �``-ova U m wte=a ° amro Eo m o 0 d E m E O U))m.a+£ _ n 0 cu a C J o GO :) ID o ro y W ZEE N Q C ya - .y fL' 2 mN �: U 2! t Im m aL. C r O. A `7 N L m ro : N N nS ro C O °,ga=r co 3 r m N 0 E rri m E ro0C 10 =o y�_N � m� N roin c -0 �; U w ro v) N C oo G. �nE at U1 N p O O N N j — m 0 a) n. E p Q> u) m 2 a'v¢ 0 N I -Y U)cntn I I ti r (Ji G N � N 3Gg N G 2 s o c L N 0 a > 0O .0 4) N N 'IUD m m I o t � �E�+ o L 0 N U i) D N C .� y 0 Z eq o w 5 (a N 0 Q o rolEi N' O. N IL o E ro m I L El m LL 00 8 13 SL a`r aow N O C N I � O N O m o u OO O •� r e W I m 0 a i� C_�� ° amro yr d E m E O D N H U .!= O LO It 0 0 N N co 0 a N Z ro Z m m N 7 1� � � 0 c U m a 'IUD m m N 0 m ° o t m o a U i) D N C .� y 0 Z eq o w 5 rn D Ts J Q m L El m LL 00 8 13 SL u m y r}y O C Q C G V OC O D a m v v o ' L 0 e0s a o 0 0 0 p 0 0 U m a fl o a Q m m a m m 0 c [) 0 z M Q d c m 0 0 zo m Q m m c .0 0 ® m O Q Vi LO It 0 0 N N co 0 a N Z ro Z Hydrologic Soil Group—Roanoke County and the Cities of Roanoke and Salem, Virginia Soil Map for Hollins Road Hydrologic Soil Group Hydrologic Soil Group— Summary by Map Unit — Roanoke County and the Cities of Roanoke and Salem, Virginia (VA161) Map unit symbol I Map unit name I Rating I Acres in AOI 18D Frederick silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 49B Tumbling loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes. 49C Tumbling loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes B 1 1.0 B 1 4.7 B 1 1.0 49D Tumbling loam, 15 to 25 B 0.5 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 7.1 Description Percent of AOI 13.3% 65.7% 13.4% 7.5% 100.0% Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long -duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (AID, BID, and CID). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when. thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (AID, BID, or CID), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 9!112015 r Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4 Hydrologic Soil Group—Roanoke County and the Cities of Roanoke and Salem, Virginia Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff. None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher Soil Map for Hollins Road uson Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 8!112015 Conservation Service National Cooperative Sol[ Survey Page 4 of 4 Appendix A EDR NEPA Check Mead & Hunt, Inc. 84021600-155994.01 Hollins Road VAROHR1 5119 Hollins Road Roanoke, VA 24019 Inquiry Number; 4399470.22s September 01, 2015 6 Armstrong Road, 41h floor www.edrnet.comt.com Shelton, CT 06484 CEDRO Environmental Data Resources Inc Toll Free: 2.0050 !' TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE EDR NEPACheck® Description ............................................. 1 MapFindings Summary........................................................ 2 NaturalAreas.......................................................................... 3 HistoricSites.......................................................................... 5 FloodPlain............................................................................. 9 Wetlands................................................................................. 11 Wetlands Classification System .......................................... 13 FCC & FAA Sites.................................................................... 17 Key Contacts and Government Records Searched........... 22 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding progrilles does not exist from other Sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. EDR NEPACheck®'DESCRIPTION The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) requires that Federal agencies include in their decision-making processes appropriate and careful consideration of all environmental effects and actions, analyze potential environmental effects of proposed actions and their alternatives for public understanding and scrutiny, avoid or minimize adverse effects of proposed actions, and restore and enhance environmental quality as much as possible. The EDR NEPACheck provides information which may be used, in conjunction with additional research, to determine whether a proposed site or action will have significant environmental effect. The report provides maps and data for the following items (where available). Search results are provided in the Map Findings Summary on page 2 of this report. Section Regulation Natural Areas Map • Federal Lands Data: - Officially designated wilderness areas 47 CFR 1.1307(1) - Officially designated wildlife preserves, sanctuaries 47 CFR 1.1307(2) and refuges - Wild and scenic rivers 40 CFR 6.302(e) - Fish and Wildlife 40 CFR 6.302 • Threatened or Endangered Species, Fish 47 CFR 1.1307(3); 40 CFR 6.302 and Wildlife, Critical Habitat Data (where available) Historic Sites Map • National Register of Historic Places 47 CFR 1.1307(4); 40 CFR 6.302 • State Historic Places (where available) • Indian Reservations Flood Plain Map • National Flood Plain Data (where available) 47 CFR 1.1307(6); 40 CFR 6.302 Wetlands Map • National Wetlands Inventory Data (where available) 47 CFR 1.1307(7); 40 CFR 6.302 FCC & FAA Map • FCC antenna/tower sites, FAA Markings and 47 CFR 1.1307(8) Obstructions, Airports, Topographic gradient Key Contacts and Government Records Searched TC4399470.22s Page 1 of 28 MAP FINDINGS SUMMi4RY The databases searched in this report are fisted below. Database descriptions and other agency contact information is contained in the Key Contacts and Government Records Searched section on page 22 of this report. TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS HOLLINS ROAD VAROHR1 5119 HOLLINS ROAD ROANOKE, VA 24019 TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES Latitude (North): Longitude (West): Universal Tranverse Mercator: UTM X (Meters): UTM Y (Meters): Inquiry #: 4399470.22s Date: 911115 37.329102 - 37° 19'44.8" 79.925697 - 79° 55'32.5" Zone 17 595177.2 4131718.5 Search Distance Within Within Applicable Regulation from 47 CFR/FCC Checklist Database (Miles) Search 118 Mile NATURAL AREAS MAP 1.1307a (1) Officially Designated Wilderness Area 1.1307a (2) Officially Designated Wildlife Preserve 1.1307a (3) Threatened or Endangered Species or Critical Habitat 1.1307a (2) Officially Designated Wildlife Preserve 1.1307a (2) Officially Designated Wildlife Preserve 1.1307a (3) Threatened or Endangered Species or Critical Habitat HISTORIC SITES MAP 1.1307a (4) Listed or eligible for National Register 1.1307a (4) Listed or eligible for National Register FLOODPLAIN MAP 1.1307 (6) Located in a Flood Plain WETLANDS MAP 1.1307 (7) Change in surface features (wetland fill) FCC & FAA SITES MAP US Federal Lands 1.00 NO NO US Federal Lands 1.00 NO NO VA Endangered Species 1.00 YES YES VA Wildlife Areas 1.00 NO NO VA Conservation Lands 1.00 NO NO County Endangered Species County YES NIA VA Historic Sites 1.00 YES NO National Register of Hist. Pla 1.00 YES NO Indian Reservation 1.00 NO NO APPAL -TRAIL 1.00 NO NO FLOODPLAIN 1.00 YES NO NWI 1.00 NO NO Cellular 1.00 NO NO 4G Cellular 1.00 NO NO Antenna Structure Registration 1.00 YES NO Towers 1.00 NO NO AM Antenna 1.00 NO NO FM Antenna 1.00 NO NO FAA DOF 1.00 NO NO Airports 1.00 NO --- Power Lines 1.00 YES --- TC4399470.22s Page 2 of 28 o Target Property Roads County Boundary Waterways ■ Water o Locations Federal Areas Federal Linear Features State Areas ti a State Linear Features Natural Areas Map d 114 112 1 Mlles SITE NAME: Hollins Road VAROHRi CLIENT: Mead & Hunt ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road CONTACT: Teresa Schuller Roanoke VA 24019 INQUIRY #: 4399470.22s LAVLONG: 37.3291/79.9257 DATE: September 1, 2015 TC4399470.2h Page 3of28 'NATURAL AREAS MAP FINDINGS Federal Endangered Species Listed for: ROANOKE County, VA. Source: EPA Endangered Species Protection Program Database FISH: LOGPERCH, ROANOKE PLANT: CONEFLOWER, SMOOTH Map ID Direction Distance EDR ID Distance (ft.) Database II 111111 Y-- 1 SW VA30000018 0-118 mi VA Endangered Species 291 Edrid: VA30000018 Type: FISH TC4399470.22s Page 4 of 28 ')feta Ave NE N x $ i i rn � 1/ d NE w 2 2 m a � m am Isfien Ave NE - * Target Property ♦ Historic Sites N Streets Federal Historic Areas N County Boundary State Historic Areas Waterways us Indian Reservations ■ Water /4t/ Scenic Trail Historic Sites Map � Y11 K ey„1Q' v` 0 114 112 1 Mlles SITE NAME: Hollins Road VAROHRI CLIENT: Mead & Hunt ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road CONTACT: Teresa Schuller Roanoke VA 24019 INQUIRY #: 4399470.22s LAT/LONG: 37.3291 179.9257 DATE: September 1, 2015 TC439947012s NpSofN HISTORIC: SITES MAP FIPIpINGS- Map ID Direction Distance EDR ID Distance (ft.) Database 1 IIYII YYYIYPYYpIYaI — - Al SW 112-1 mi 4361 Resname: Address: City: Vicinity: County: State: Certdate: Multname: Acre: Harshbarger House 316 John Richardson Rd. (Co. Rt. 743) Roanoke (Independent City) X Roanoke VIRGINIA 19921015 Not Reported 2.0+ 92001390 National Register of Hist. Places A2 SSE SW 112-1 mi VA10001450 112-1 mi Resname VA Historic Sites 4433 County: ROANOKE COUNTY Name: HARSHBARGER HOSUE City: Not Reported Site descl: Samuel Harshbarger built the original stone portion of this house, one of Roanoke County's oldest dwellings, in 1797. The use of stone here is a rare reminder of a German -influenced building tradition in the area. Samuel Harshbarger came from Pennsyl Site desc2: vania with a group with a group of Swiss or German Brethren, known as Dunkards. The family added the brick wing around 1825. The Harshbargers are said to have been rigourous in their use of German customs and language. Their Brethren principles led t Site desc3: hem to oppose slavery. Fearing he would be unable to compete with area slaveholding farmers, Samuel's son Jacob sold his portion of the property in 1831 and moved to Indiana. His father eventually followed him, selling his land to John Jeffries in 18 Site desc4: 37. Though now surrounded by suburban development, the house enjoys a protected setting. A recent restoration has enhanced Its historic character. Site desc5: Not Reported Site number: 80-13 Vlr date: 10/09/91 Added date: 10/15/92 Edr id: VA10001450 Isgeo: N 3 SSE 112-1 mi 5253 Resname Address: City: Vicinity: Monterey Tinker Creek Lane, NE Roanoke X 74002146 National Register of Hist. Places TC4399470.22s Page 6 of 28 HISTORIC SITES MAP. .FINDINGS: I 1 Map ID Direction Distance EDR ID Distance (ft.) Database County: Roanoke State: VIRGINIA Ceridate: 19740730 Muitnarne; Not Reported Acre: 117.0+ TC4399470.22s Page 7 of 28 UMMAPPABIE HISTORIC SITES Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped: Status EDR ID Database No unmapped sites were found in EDR's search of available government records. TC4399470.22s Page 8 of 28 Mood Plain Map lo P® Aye _ 1t zo L6/,.f .� I, iaw i ; W ter Oek 15 C. ] 1=rontfe1"aN£ ,a Christian AVe NE u \ b 'M°rnere�` f exp SITE NAME: Hollins Road VAROHRI CLIENT: Mead & Hunt ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road CONTACT: Teresa Schuller Roanoke VA 24019 INQUIRY#: 4399470.22s LAULONG: 37.3291 179,9257 DATE: September 1, 2015 TC4199410.22s Page9of28 0 114 112 1 Miles Major Roads Power Lines Contour Lines Pipe Lines . Water Waterways Fault Lines m -year flood zone NCounty Boundary 500 -year flood zone Electronic FEMA data available Electronic FEMA data not available SITE NAME: Hollins Road VAROHRI CLIENT: Mead & Hunt ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road CONTACT: Teresa Schuller Roanoke VA 24019 INQUIRY#: 4399470.22s LAULONG: 37.3291 179,9257 DATE: September 1, 2015 TC4199410.22s Page9of28 FLOOD PLAIN MAP FINDINGS Source: FEMA DFIRM Flood Data, FEMA Q3 Flood Data County FEMA flood data electronic coverage ROANOKE,VA YES ROANOKE CITY, VA YES Flood Plain panel at target property: 51161C (FEMA DFIRM Flood data) Additional Flood Plain panel(s) in search area: 51161CO024D (FEMA Q3 Flood data) 51161CO028D (FEMA Q3 Flood data) TC4399470.22s Page 10 of 28 National Wetlands inventory Map Iwo IT ID11 Rd low y f j O' ter0A� � � � _ .Salm Richaraao9 ron !er d NF I 111 < f NE bqa Chrlstion Ave NE- - ro Bre { D 114 112 1 Mlles Major Roads )IJ Power Lines Contour Lines f Pipe Lines ■ Water Waterways Fault Lines ® National Wetlands Inventory ,A/ County Boundary Electronic NWI data available Electronic NWI data not available SITE NAME: Hollins Road VAROHRI CLIENT: Mead & Hunt ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road CONTACT: Teresa Schuller Roanoke VA 24019 INQUIRY #: 4399470.22s LATILON& 37.3291 179.9257 DATE: September 1, 2015 TC4399470.22s Page II of 28 WETLANDS MAR'FINDINGS Source: Fish and Wildlife Service NWI data NWI hardcopy map at target property: Roanoke Additional NWI hardcopy map(s) in search area: Not reported in source data Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Code and Description" Database -•�•• • • •• Ill lilliiiiiiiiil liliili� No Sites Reported. *See Wetland Classification System for additional information. TC4399470.22s Page 12 of 28 WETLANDS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM National Wetland Inventory Maps are produced by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, a sub -department of the U.S. Department of the Interior. In 1974, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service developed a criteria for wetland classification with four long range objectives: to describe ecological units that have certain homogeneous natural attributes, to arrange these units in a system that will aid decisions about resource management, to furnish units for inventory and mapping, and to provide uniformity in concepts and terminology throughout the U.S. High altitude infrared photographs, soil maps, topographic maps and site visits are the methods used to gather data for the productions of these maps. In the Infrared photos, wetlands appear as different colors and these wetlands are then classified by type. Using a hierarchical classification, the maps identify wetland and deepwater habitats according to: system subsystem class subclass modifiers (as defined by Cowardin, et al. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS 79131. 1979.) The classification system consists of five systems: 1. marine 2. estuarine 3. riverine 4. lacustrine 5. palustrine The marine system consists of deep water tidal habitats and adjacent tidal wetlands. The riverine system consists of all wetlands contained within a channel. The lacustrine systems includes all nontidal wetlands related to swamps, bogs & marshes. The estuarine system consists of deepwater tidal habitats and where ocean water is diluted by fresh water. The palustrine system includes nontidal wetlands dominated by trees and shrubs and where salinity is below .5% in tidal areas. All of these systems are divided in subsystems and then further divided into class. National Wetland Inventory Maps are produced by transferring gathered data on a standard 7.5 minute U.S.G.S. topographic map. Approximately 52 square miles are covered on a National Wetland Inventory map at a scale of 1:24,000. Electronic data is compiled by digitizing these National Wetland Inventory Maps. TC4399470.22s Page 13 of 28 TC4399470.22s Page 14 of 28 A �m zAAW U w -�ANAM fuv �n ar A W w x N N U •a9�°'�tia�g� u v�u r uvl...�AN LA Iq N a W CY A � � •-t M vl to ° 1 W w �� N w N � 3 M J U � w d � > tng3 rnp3 Q ''7 is d d �vp'mp d t= y Qp N V� [ NMK 1 �.1 V '� J r•i 4d a� pq � G4 4Y7.e p� O GC � 0 CMM/S Ua r W Q J W Q F/1 QO V V] Vl U V2 U rA TC4399470.22s Page 14 of 28 W 3o z� W4 0 0 w 3 a o O � � z x •�, w � � � o � � N � Q r) o 7 zn UviO� e� UO R Ey 79 W u in W ��Ojj •^• N 79 1 ! w�a vii y u P4 �QGw v]1O tD" N M per+ GG U ' /-. V G4 '--' �' 10 �r ..cqmv10n > O �R Cgr`n��0 A pD� U V4) pq V rn D C4 fxl cd 7 Nei �M�7� 0.i !nom W in pi I W W fs7 CID � f A A ¢ A U � � U U Wf/) V] U -u (A U M TC4399470.22s Page 15 of 28 iS a .-- �w r� �7 O Q� a V z U O � •:gg � O� b .0 OW y O V v � p �Anz,A� 71 - Ain w u V A N �•�3zo�wzwA�w � 'D ti x w w w .� LL � wz w � N �z W r� �7 O Q� a V z U O � •:gg � .•-NMdv's Ur $A u 00 �a �4 raw' o � pU d � a a ° U 0.1 rn TG4399470.22s Page 16 of 28 r� �7 O U a w � a wwA� r" V .0 OW y O V q^„ 3 � u 'D ti x w w �y000� y N M ,t GF- V) b � � coi.ob 3 � •a Ta �4 Z U a *� o z f�77ab Q 9o l i l o V w C6 v) `n v, d Gc1 U A W w C7 TG4399470.22s Page 16 of 28 FCC & FAA Sites Map t r. r _ t r 4� 1 ��� �. d 0 a nalla 0 1 , p Water oekFid t Y II 11 o m / 9; Qriaorlu { FD `.� > j R - °f V J _1 i"r°n{farHdryE w @vino A. o Q jdc 4 }j '41 C ` ChrfstiNf an Ave -� - 1 I / __• I,MontereF� 0 114 1/2 1 Was Sites SITE NAME: Hollins Road VAROHRI CLIENT: Mead & Hunt ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road CONTACT: Teresa Schuller Roanoke VA 240-19 INQUIRY #: 4399470.22s LAT/LONG: 37.3291/79.9257 DATE: September 1, 2015 TC4399470.22s Page 17 of 28 Streets Contour Lines County Boundary Waterways Power Lines . Water 0 114 1/2 1 Was Sites SITE NAME: Hollins Road VAROHRI CLIENT: Mead & Hunt ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road CONTACT: Teresa Schuller Roanoke VA 240-19 INQUIRY #: 4399470.22s LAT/LONG: 37.3291/79.9257 DATE: September 1, 2015 TC4399470.22s Page 17 of 28 FCC.&'FAASIT.ES MAP FINDINGS TQWERS Map ID Direction Distance EDR ID Distance (ft.) Database I Ill liI IIIIIYYY IYYYIYYYIIIIIIIIIii 1 ANT130000102915 North ANTREG 118-114 mi 738 Regnum: 1261233 Filenum: A0578505 Issuedate: 1/2/2008 Entity: County of Roanoke, VA Strucht: 30.5 Strucadd: Lot NE corner SR601 and SR616 Struccity: Roanoke Strucstate: VA Faastudy: 2007 -AEA -6461 -OE Faacirc: Not Reported Licid: L00002877 Contname: IT Dept 1 Communications Contadd: 1216 Kessler Mill Rd Contpo: Not Reported Contcily: Salem Contstate: VA Contzip: 24153 Edr id: ANT130000102915 This record is for a license, and it may or may not indicate a site which has been built. TC4399470.22s Page 18 of 28 PCC &FAA SLATES MAP FINDINGS :AIRPORTS No Sites Reported. EDR ID Database TC4399 M22s Page 19 of 28 SCG.&FAA SITES: MAP FINDINGS POWERLINES Voltage: 138 Range: Not Reported Hi voltage: 0 Volt cat: 70-138 kV Type: Alternating current Status: Active Corridor: Single line Owner: American Electric Power Owner id: AMELECCO Num owners: Single Owner Operator: Appalachian Power Co. Operator id: APPPOW Last owner: Not Reported Last own id: Not Reported Last aper: Not Reported Last aper id: Not Reported Mileage: 4.3459524600000004 Voltage: 138 Range: Not Reported Hi voltage: 0 Volt cat: 70-138 kV Type: Alternating current Status: Active Corridor: Multiple lines Owner: American Electric Power Owner id: AMELECCO Num owners: Single Owner Operator: Appalachian Power Co. Operator id: APPPOW Last owner: Not Reported Last own id: Not Reported Last oper: Not Reported Last oper id: Not Reported Mileage: .57314151000000002 Voltage: 69 Range: Not Reported Hi voltage: 0 Volt cat: 0-69 W Type: Alternating current Status: Active Corridor: Multiple lines Owner: American Electric Power EDR ID Database 47445 POWERLINES 47444 POWERLINES 47443 POWERLINES TC4399470.22s Page 20 of 28 TCCA. FAASITES MqP FINDINGS POWERLINES...... Owner id: AMELECCO Num owners: Single Owner Operator: Appalachian Power Co. Operator ld: APPPOW Last owner: Not Reported Last own id: Not Reported Last oper: Not Reported Last oper id: Not Reported Mileage: .57314151000000002 Voltage: 69 Range: Not Reported Hi voltage: 0 Volt cat: 0-69 kV Type: Alternating current Status: Active Corridor: Multiple lines Owner: American Electric Power Owner id: AMELECCO Num owners: Single Owner Operator: Appalachian Power Co. Operator id: APPPOW Last owner: Not Reported Last own id: Not Reported Last oiler: Not Reported Last aper id: Not Reported Mileage: 5.4830673799999996 Voltage: 138 Range: Not Reported Hi voltage: 0 Volt cat: 70-138 kV Type: Alternating current Status: Active Corridor: Multiple lines Owner: American Electric Power Owner id: AMELECCO Num owners: Single Owner Operator: Appalachian Power Co. Operator id: APPPOW Last owner: Not Reported Last own id: Not Reported Last aper: Not Reported Last aper id: Not Reported Mileage: 5.4830673799999996 EDR ID Database 47441 POWERLINES 47442 POWERLINES TC4399470.22s Page 21 of 28 KEY CONTACTS & GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED Various Federal laws and executive orders address specific environmental concerns. NEPA requires the responsible offices to integrate to the greatest practical extent the applicable procedures required by these laws and executive orders, EDR provides key contacts at agencies charged with implementing these laws and executive orders to supplement the information contained in this report, NATURAL AREAS Officially designated wilderness areas Government Records Searched in This F FED LAND: Federal Lands Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-5094 Federal data from Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service, Forest Service, and Fish and Wildlife Service. - National Parks - Forests - Monuments -Wildlife Sanctuaries, Preserves, Refuges - Federal Wilderness Areas. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Federal Contacts for Additional Information National Park Service, Northeast Region 200 custom Street, Fifth Floor Philadelphia, PA 19106 215-597-7013 National Park Service, National Capital Region 1100 Ohio Drive, SW Washington, DC 20242 202-619-7256 USDA Forest Service, Southern 1720 Peachtree Road, N.W. Atlanta, GA 30367 404-347-2384 BLM - Eastern States Office 7450 Boston Blvd. Springfield, VA 22153 703-440-1713 Fish & Wildlife Service, Region 5 Div. Of Personnel Mgmt. 300 Westgate Center Drive Hadley, MA 01035-9589 413-253-8313 Officially designated wildlife preserves, sanctuaries and refuges Government Records Searched in This Report FED LAND: Federal Lands Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-5094 Federal data from Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service, Forest Service, and Fish and Wildlife Service. - National Parks - Forests - Monuments - Wildlife Sanctuaries, Preserves, Refuges - Federal Wilderness Areas. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 TC4399470.22s Page 22 of 28 VA Conservation Lands: Conservation Lands This dataset contains the boundaries for lands of conservation and recreational interest. Source: Department of Conservation and Recreation. Telephone: 804-786-7951 VA Wildlife Management Areas: Wildlife Management Areas This dataset contains the boundaries for lands of conservation and recreational interest. Source: Department of Conservation and Recreation. Telephone: 804-786-7951 Federal Contacts for Additional Information Fish & Wildlife Service, Region 5 Div. Of Personnel Mgmt. 300 Westgate Center Drive Hadley, MA 01035-9589 413-253-8313 State Contacts for Additional Information Wild and scenic rivers Government Records Searched in This Re FED LAND: Federal Lands Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-5094 Federal data from Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service, Forest Service, and Fish and Wildlife Service. - National Parks - Forests - Monuments -Wildlife Sanctuaries, Preserves, Refuges - Federal Wilderness Areas. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Federal Contacts for Additional Information Fish & Wildlife Service, Region 5 Div. Of Personnel Mgmt. 300 Westgate Center Drive Hadley, MA 01035-9589 413-253-8313 Endangered Species Government Records Searched in This Report Endangered Species Protection Program Database A listing of endangered species by county. Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-305-5239 VA Endangered Species: VA Endangered Species Virginia Endangered Species Source: Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. Telephone: 804-367-1000 TC4399470,22s Page 23 of 28 Federal Contacts for Additional Information Fish & Wildlife Service, Region 5 Div. Of Personnel Mgmt. 300 Westgate Center Drive Hadley, MA 01035-9589 413-253-8313 State Contacts for Additional Information Div, Of Natural Heritage, Dept. of Conservation & Recreation 804-367-1000 LANDMARKS, HISTORICAL, AND ARCHEOLOGICAL SITES Historic Places Government Records Searched in This Report National Register of Historic Places: The National Register of Historic Places is the official federal list of districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering, and culture. These contribute to an understanding of the historical and cultural foundations of the nation. The National Register includes: - All prehistoric and historic units of the National Park System; - National Historic Landmarks, which are properties recognized by the Secretary of the Interior as possessing national significance; and - Properties significant in American, state, or local prehistory and history that have been nominated by State Historic Preservation Officers, federal agencies, and others, and have been approved for listing by the National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 03/23/2006 VA Historic Sites: The Virginia Landmarks Register A listing of historic sites on the State register. A compilation of the states buildings structures sites and districts that have been officially designated as historic landmarks by the Virginia Board of Historic Resources over the past thirty years. Source: Department of Historic Resources. Telephone: 804-367-2323 Federal Contacts for Additional Information Park Service; Advisory Council on Historic Preservation 1849 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240 Phone: (202) 208-6843 State Contacts for Additional Information Department of Historic Resources 804-367-2323 Indian Religious Sites Government Records Searched in This Report Indian Reservations: This map layer portrays Indian administrated lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Source: USGS Phone: 888-275-8747 Date of Government Version: 12131/2005 TC4399470.22s Page 24 of 28 Federal Contacts for Additional Information Department of the Interior- Bureau of Indian Affairs Office of Public Affairs 1849 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20240-0001 Office: 202-208-3711 Fax: 202-501-1516 National Association of Tribal Historic Preservation Officers 1411 K Street NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC 20005 Phone: 202-628-8476 Fax: 202-628-2241 State Contacts for Additional Information A listing of local Tribal Leaders and Bureau of Indian Affairs Representatives can be found at: http://www.doi.gov/bia/areas/agency.html Scenic Trails Government Records Searched in This Report APPAL—TRAIL: Appalachian National Scenic Trail Source: Appalachian Trail Conservancy and National Park Service Appalachian Trail Park Office Telephone: (304) 535-6278 Appalachian Trail centerline. State Contacts for Additional Information Appalachian Trail Conference 799 Washington Street P.O. Box 807 Harpers Ferry, WV 25425-0807 (304) 535-6331 Potomac Heritage Partnership 1623 28th Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20007 202-338-6222 FLOOD PLAIN, WETLANDS AND COASTAL ZONE Flood Plain Management Government Records Searched in This Report Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100 -year and 500 -year flood zones as defined by FEMA. Federal Contacts for Additional Information Federal Emergency Management Agency 877-3362-627 State Contacts for Additional Information Department of Emergency Services 804-897-6500 TC4399470.22s Page 25 of 28 KEY CONTACrS.&GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED Wetlands Protection Government Records Searched in This Report NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Federal Contacts for Additional Information Fish & Wildlife Service 813-570-5412 State Contacts for Additional Information Dept. of Game & Inland Fisheries 804-367-9231 Coastal Zone Management Government Records Searched in This Report CAMA Management Areas Dept. of Env., Health & Natural Resources 919-733-2293 Federal Contacts for Additional Information Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management WORM, SSMC4 1305 East-West Highway Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 301-713-3102 State Contacts for Additional Information Coastal Program, Dept. of Environmental Quality 804-698-4320 FCC & FAA SITES MAP For NEPA actions that come under the authority of the FCC, the FCC requires evaluation of Antenna towers and/or supporting structures that are to be equipped with high intensity white lights which are to be located in residential neighborhoods, as defined by the applicable zoning law. Government Records Searched in This Report Cellular Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 888-225-5322 4G Cellular Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 888-225-5322 Antenna Structure Registration Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 888-225-5322 TC4399470.22s Page 26 of 28 KEY: CONTACTS & GOVERNAIIENT RECORDS SEARCHED Towers Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 888-225-5322 AM Antenna Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 888-225-5322 FM Antenna Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 888-225-5322 FAA Digital Obstacle File Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 1305 East-West Highway, Station 5631 Silver Sprinng, MD 20910-3281 Telephone: 301-713-2817 Describes known obstacles of interest to aviation users in the US. Used by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to manage the National Airspace System. Airport Landing Facilities Federal Aviation Administration Telephone (800) 457-6656 Private and public use landing facilities. Electric Power Transmission Line Data PennWell Corporation 800-823-6277 This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Excessive Radio Frequency Emission For NEPA actions that come under the authority of the FCC, Commission actions granting construction permits, licenses to transmit or renewals thereof, equipment authorizations or modifications in existing facilities, require the determination of whether the particular facility, operation or transmitter would cause human exposure to levels of radio frequency in excess of certain limits. Federal Contacts for Additional Information Office of Engineering and Technology Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street SW Washington, DC 20554 Phone: 202-418-2470 TC4399476.22s Page 27 of 28 KEY CONTACTS &GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED OTHER CONTACT SOURCES STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION {c} 2010 Tole Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC4399470.22s Page 28 of 28 Appendix B VADCR Letter USFWS Generic Guidance letter Mead & Hunt, 111C. R4021600-155994.01 Molly Joseph WardJoe ) Elton Secretary of Natural Resources Deputy Direelor orOperations Clyde E. Cristman Rochelle Altholz Director Deputy Director of Administration and Finance +CGIMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA David Dowling Deptio , Director of DEPARTMENT OF CONSE;R%"ATION AND RECREATION Soil and water and Dain Safety August 24, 2015 Teresa Schuller Mead and Hunt, Inc. 400 Tracy Way, Suite 200V Charleston, W 25311 Re: VAROHRI, Hollins Road Cell Tower Dear Ms. Schuller: The Department of Conservation and Recreation's Division of Natural Heritage (DCR) has searched its Biotics Data System for occurrences of natural heritage resources from the area outlined on the submitted map. Natural heritage resources are defined as the habitat of rare, threatened, or endangered plant and animal species, unique or exemplary natural communities, and significant geologic formations. According to the information currently in our files, the Roanoke River — North and South Forks Stream Conservation Unit (SCU) is downstream of the project site. SCUs identify stream reaches that contain aquatic natural heritage resources, including 2 miles upstream and 1 mile downstream of documented occurrences, and all tributaries within this reach. SCUs are given a biodiversity significance ranking based on the rarity, quality, and number of element occurrences they contain; on a scale of 1-5, 1 being most significant, The Roanoke River — North and South Forks SCU has been given a biodiversity significance ranking of B2, which represents a site of very high significance. The natural heritage resources of concern associated with this SCU are: Noturus gilberti Orangefin madtom G2/S2/SOC/LT Percina rex Roanoke logperch G I 02/S 1 S2/LE/LE Allocapnia simmonsi Spatulate snowfly G3/S182/NL/NL The Orangefin madtom is native to the Roanoke and James River systems of North Carolina and Virginia (NatureServe, 2009). The Orangefm madtom inhabits moderate to strong riffles and runs having little or no silt in moderate -gradient, intermontane and upper Piedmont streams. This species is an intersticine dweller, found in or near cavities formed by rubble and boulders (Jenkins and Burkhead, 1993). PIease note that this species is currently classified as a species of concern (not a legal designation) by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and as threatened by the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries (VDGIF). Threats to the Orangefin madtom include channelization, siltation, various forms of chronic pollution, catastrophic chemical spills, impoundment, dewatering, and bait -seining (NatureServe, 2009). Its low reproductive rate and short life span (Simonson 1997, Simonson and Neves 1992, Simonson 1987) exacerbate these threats (Burkhead and Jenkins 1991), The Roanoke logperch is endemic to the Roanoke and Chowan River drainages in Virginia (Burkhead and Jenkins, 199 1) and inhabits medium and Iarge, warm and usually clear rivers with sandy to boulder spotted 600 East Main Street, 20 Floor I Richmond, Virginia 23219 1 804-786-6124 State Parks • Soil and Water Conservation • Outdoor Recreation Planning Natural Heritage • Dam Safety and Floodplain Management • Land Conservation bottoms (NatureServe, 2009). Please note that this species is currently classified as endangered by the USFWS and the VDGIF. The Roanoke logperch is threatened by channelization, siltation, impoundment, pollution, and de -watering activities (Burkhead & Jenkins, 1991). Spatulate snowfly is a stonefly documented in only two locations in Virginia. Stoneflies are generally medium- sized to small, somewhat flattened, soft -bodied, rather drab -colored insects found near streams or rocky lake shores (Borror, 1981). They are poor fliers and are seldom found far from water, Stonefly nymphs are often found under stones in streams but may occasionally be found anywhere in a stream where food is available (Borror, 1981). Stoneflies are highly sensitive to any practices that degrade the quality of its aquatic habitat. In addition, Tinker Creek has been designated by the VDGIF as a "Threatened and Endangered Species Water" and is downstream of the project site. The species associated with this T & E Water is the Roanoke logperch. There is the potential for the Northern Long-eared bat (Myons septentrionalis, G1 G3/S31LT/NL) to occur within the project area. The Northern Long-eared bat is a small insect -eating bat characterized by its long -rounded ears that when folded forward extend beyond the tip of the nose. Hibernation occurs in caves, mines and tunnels from late fall through early spring and bats occupy summer roosts comprised of older trees including single and multiple tree -fall gaps, standing snags and woody debris. Threats include white nose syndrome and loss of hibemacula, maternity roosts and foraging habitat (NatureServe, 2014). Due to the decline in population numbers, the Northern Long-eared bat has been federally listed as "threatened" by the USFWS. To minimize adverse impacts to the aquatic ecosystem as a result of the proposed activities, DCR recommends the implementation of and strict adherence to applicable state and local erosion and sediment control/storm water management laws and regulations. Due to the legal status of the Roanoke logperch and Orangefin madtom, DCR also recommends coordination with the USFWS and the VDGIF to ensure compliance with protected species legislation. Finally, DCR recommends coordination with the USFWS regarding potential impacts upon federally threatened Northern Long-eared bats associated with tree removal. This project is situated on karst-forming carbonate rock and can be characterized by sinkholes, caves, disappearing streams, and large springs. If such features are encountered during the project, please coordinate with Wil Orndorff (540-230-5960, W l.Omdorff(a,dcr.virginia.gov) to document and minimize adverse impacts. Discharge of runoff to sinkholes or sinking streams, filling of sinkholes, and alteration of cave entrances can lead to surface collapse, flooding, erosion and sedimentation, groundwater contamination, and degradation of subterranean habitat for natural heritage resources. If the project involves filling or "improvement" of sinkholes or cave openings, DCR would like detailed location information and copies of the design specifications. In cases where sinkhole improvement is for stormwater discharge, copies of VDOT Form EQ -120 will suffice. New "Karst Assessment Guidelines" developed by the Virginia Cave Board for land development can be found at littp://www,dcr.virginia.izov/natural heritage/documents/karst assessment guidelines.pdf. In addition, according to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Guidance dated September 14, 2000 "new construction of communication towers creates a potentially significant impact on migratory birds, especially some 350 species of night -migrating birds". "Communications towers are estimated to kill 4-5 million birds per year and some of these species affected are also protected under the Endangered Species Act and Bald and Golden Eagle Act" (USFWS, 2000). Therefore, DCR recommends voluntary implementation of USFWS interim guidelines for Communication Tower Siting, Construction, Operation, and Decommissioning htt ://www.fws. ov/northeast/vir iniafield/ df/ends ecies/Cell°/`20Towers/Cell%20Guidance.PDF. Under a Memorandum of Agreement established between the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (VDACS) and the DCR, DCR represents VDACS in comments regarding potential impacts on state - listed threatened and endangered plant and insect species. The current activity will not affect any documented state -listed plants or insects. There are no State Natural Area Preserves under DCR's jurisdiction in the project vicinity. New and updated information is continually added to Biotics. Please re -submit a completed order form and project map for an update on this natural heritage information if the scope of the project changes and/or six months has passed before it is utilized. A fee of $125.00 has been assessed for the service of providing this information. Please find enclosed an invoice for that amount. Please return one copy of the invoice along with your remittance made payable to the Treasurer of Virginia, Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, 600 East Main Street, 24'" Floor, Richmond, VA 23219. Payment is due within thirty days of the invoice date. Please note late payment may result in the suspension of project review service for future projects. The VDGTF maintains a database of wildlife locations, including threatened and endangered species, trout streams, and anadromous fish waters that may contain information not documented in this letter. Their database may be accessed from http://vafwis.org/fwis/ or contact Ernie Aschenbach at 804-367-2733 or Emic.Aschetibach@dgifvirginia.gov. Should you have any questions or concerns, feel free to contact me at 804-371-2708. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. Sincerely, r S. Ren6 Hypes Project Review Coordinator CC: Ernie Aschenbach, VDGIF Troy Anderson, USFWS Wil Orndorff, DCR-Karst Literature Cited Borror, D.J., D. M. De Long, and C. A. Triplehorn. 1981. An Introduction to the Study of Insects. Saunders College Publishing, Philadelphia. Burkhead, N.M. and R.E. Jenkins. 1991. Roanoke logperch. In Virginia's Endangered Species: Proceedings of a Symposium. K. Terwilliger ed. The McDonald and Woodward Publishing Company, Blacksburg, Virginia. p. 395-397. Jenkins, R. E., and N. M. Burkhead. 1993. Freshwater fishes of Virginia. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland. NatureServe. 2009. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.1. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Available http:I/www.natureserve.org/explorer. (Accessed: June 21, 2010). NatureServe, 2014. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.1. NatureServe. Arlington, Virginia. Available http://explorer.natureserve.orm (Accessed: December 22, 2014). Simonson, T. D. 1987. Distribution, ecology, and reproductive biology of the orangefin madtom (Noturus gilberti). M.S. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg. Simonson, T. D. 1997. Orangefin madtom. Pages 15-16 in E. F. Menhinick and A. L. Braswell, editors. Endangered, threatened, and rare fauna of North Carolina. Part IV. A reevaluation of the freshwater fishes. Occasional Papers of the North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences and the North Carolina Biological Survey No. 11. Simonson, T. D., and R. J. Neves. 1992. Habitat suitability and reproductive traits of the orangefin madtom NOTURUS GILBERTI (Pisces: Ictaluridae). American Midland Naturalist 127:115-24. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2000. Interim Guidelines for Recommendations on Communications Tower Siting, Construction, Operation, and Decommissioning. Teresa Schuller From: Teresa Schuller Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 10:54 AM To: ernie.aschenbach@dgif.virginia.gov; troy.anderson@va.gov Subject: Comments on Hollins Road VADCR letter Attachments: 11SFWS official species list.pdf; VADCR response letter.pdf; iPaC resources.pdf; topo spot .pdf; ESA Pictures.pdf Importance: High Categories: Filed by Newforma Ernie and Troy — This letter was received from Renee Hypes and she recommended coordination with your agencies. If you would please let me know if there is any additional information, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. Teresa A. Schuller I Sr. Environmental Project Manager I Associate Mead & Hunt I M & H Architecture, Inc 1400 Tracy Way, Suite 2001 Charleston, West Virginia 25311 Direct: 681-313-46171 Mobile: 304-415-91841 Fax: 304-345-6714 teresa.schuller@meadhunt.com I www.meadliunt,com No response received from either agency as of 10/7/15 .1 J .S IPaC Trust Resource Report US Fish & Wildlife Service IPaC Trust Resource Report Project Description NAME Hollins Road Tower PROJECT CODE ME3BQ-4QEZR-CGTCL-S5KXLJ-A3VXBM LOCATION Roanoke County, Virginia DESCRIPTION construction of a 195 -ft monopole within a 75 -ft x 75 -ft compound with new access road and utility easement. ME3BQ-4QEZR-CGTCL-S5KXU-A3VXBM U.S. Fish & Wildlife Contact Information Species in this report are managed by: Virginia Ecological Services Field Office 6669 Short Lane Gloucester, VA 23061-4410 (804) 693-6694 07130/2015 01:03 IPaC Information for Planning and Conservation Page 2 IPaC Trust Resource Report Endangered Species ME3BQ-4QEZR-CCTCL-S5KXU-A3VXBM Proposed, candidate, threatened, and endangered species that are managed by the Endangered Species Program and should be considered as part of an effect analysis for this project. This unofficial species list is for informational purposes only and does not fulfill the requirements under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, which states that Federal agencies are required to "request of the Secretary of Interior information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed action." This requirement applies to projects which are conducted, permitted or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can be obtained by returning to this project on the IPaC website and requesting an Official Species List from the regulatory documents section. Fishes Roanoke Logpereh Percina rex CRITICAL HABITAT No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https:llecos.fws.00v/speciesProfile/ ro�peciesProfrle.action?spcode=E01 G Mammals Indiana Bat Myotis sodalis CRITICAL HABITAT No critical habitat has been designated for this species, https:l/ecos,fws.uov/speciesProfrle/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=A000 Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis CRITICAL HABITAT No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https:llecos.fws.aov/speciesProfilelprofile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=AOJE Critical Habitats Endangered Endangered Potential effects to critical habitat(s) within the project area must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves. There is no critical habitat within this project area W/30120 15 01:03 IPaC Information for Planning and Conservation Page 3 IPaC Trust Resource Reporl Migratory Birds ME3B(-)-401-:ZR-CGTCL•-S5KXU-.A3VXBM Birds are protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. Any activity which results in the take of migratory birds or eagles is prohibited unless authorized by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1). There are no provisions for allowing the take of migratory birds that are unintentionally killed or injured. You are responsible for complying with the appropriate regulations for the protection of birds as part of this project. This involves analyzing potential impacts and implementing appropriate conservation measures for all project activities. Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bird of conservation concern Year-round https:liecos fws-gov/speciesProtile/ roohle/speciesProfile action?spcode=8008 Black -billed Cuckoo Coccyzus erythropthalmus Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding htt s://ecos.fws. ov/s eciesProfrle/ rofile/s eciesProfile action?s code=BOHI Blue -winged Warbler Vermivora pinus Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding Fox Sparrow Passerella iliaca Bird of conservation concerti Season: wintering Golden -winged Warbler Vermivora chrysoptera Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding https://ecos fws.govlspeciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?speode=BOG4 Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding Loggerhead Shrike Lanius ludovicianus Bird of conservation concern Year-round his•Jlecos.fws.govlspeciesProfrle/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=BOFY Louisiana Waterthrush Parkesia motacilla Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding Pied -billed Grebe Podilymbus podiceps Bird of conservation concern Year-round Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes orythrocephalus Bird of conservation, concern Year-round Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Bird of conservation concern Season: Wintering Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding Worm Eating Warbler Helmitheros vermivorum Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding 07/3012015 04:03 1PaC Information for Planning and Conservation PacJr, 1 IPaC Trust Resource Report ME3BQ-40EZR-CCTCL-S51<XU-A3VXBM Yellow -bellied Sapsucker sphyrapicus varius Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding https:llecos fws aov/speciesProfilel rop file/speciesProfile action?spcode=BOFR 0713012015 01:03 IPaC Information for Planning and Conservation Paye 5 WaC Trust Resource Report Refuges ME3BQ-4QEZR-CCTC L-S5KXLl-A3VXBM Any activity proposed on National Wildlife Refuge lands must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. If your project overlaps or otherwise impacts a Refuge, please contact that Refuge to discuss the authorization process. There are no refuges within this project area 07/30/2015 01:03 Mac Information for Planning and Conservation Page 6 IPaC Trust Resource Report Wetlands ME3BQ-4 QEZR-CGTCL-S5KXU-A3VXBM Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats from your project may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal Statutes. Project proponents should discuss the relationship of these requirements to their project with the Regulatory Program of the appropriate U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District. DATA LIMITATIONS The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwator habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis. The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts„ the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems. Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site, DATA EXCLUSIONS Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery. DATA PRECAUTIONS Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities. Wetland data is unavailable at this time. 07/3012015 01:03 IPaG Information for Planning and Conservation Page 7 United States Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Washington, DC 20240 September 14, 2000 To: Regional Directors From: Director Isl Jamie Rappaport Clark Subject: Service Guidance on the Siting, Construction, Operation and Decommissioning of Communications Towers Construction of communications towers (including radio, television, cellular, and microwave) in the United States has been growing at an exponential rate, increasing at an estimated 6 percent to 8 percent annually. According to the Federal Communication Commission's 2000 Antenna Structure Registry, the number of lighted towers greater than 199 feet above ground level (AGL) currently number over 45,000 and the total number of towers over 74,000. Non-compliance with the registry program is estimated at 24 percent to 38 percent, bringing the total to 92,000 to 102,000. By 2003, all television stations must be digital, adding potentially 1,000 new towers exceeding 1,000 feet AGL. The construction of new towers creates a potentially significant impact on migratory birds, especially some 350 species of night -migrating birds. Communications towers arc estimated to kill 4-5 million birds per year, which violates the spirit and the intent of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Code of Federal Regulations at Part 50 designed to implement the MBTA. Some of the species affected are also protected under the Endangered Species Act and Bald and Golden Eagle Act. Service personnel may become involved in the review of proposed tower sitings and/or in the evaluation of tower impacts on migratory birds through National Environmental Policy Act review; specifically, Sections 1501.6, opportunity to be a cooperating agency, and 1503.4, duty to comment on federally - licensed activities for agencies with jurisdiction by law, in this case the MBTA, or because of special expertise. Also, the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act requires that any activity on Refuge lands be determined as compatible with the Refuge system mission and the Refuge purpose(s). In addition, the Service is required by the ESA to assist other Federal agencies in ensuring that any action they authorize, implement, or fund will not jeopardize the continued existence of any Federally endangered or threatened species. A Communication Tower Working Group composed of government agencies, industry, academic researchers and NGO's has been formed to develop and implement a research protocol to determine the best ways to construct and operate towers to prevent bird strikes. Until the research study is completed, or until research efforts uncover significant new mitigation measures, all Service personnel involved in the review of proposed tower sitings and/or the evaluation of the impacts of towers on migratory birds should use the attached interim guidelines when making recommendations to all companies, license applicants, or licensees proposing new tower sitings. These guidelines were developed by Service personnel from research conducted in several eastern, midwestern, and southern states, and have been refined through Regional review. They are based on the best information available at this time, and are the most prudent and effective measures for avoiding bird strikes at towers. We believe that they will provide significant protection for migratory birds pending completion of the Working Group's recommendations. As new information becomes available, the guidelines will be updated accordingly. Implementation of these guidelines by the communications industry is voluntary, and our recommendations must be balanced with Federal Aviation Administration requirements and local community concerns where necessary. Field offices have discretion in the use of these guidelines on a case by case basis, and may also have additional recommendations to add which are specific to their geographic area. Also attached is a Towey Site Evaluation Form which may prove useful in evaluating proposed towers and in streamlining the evaluation process. Copies may be provided to consultants or tower companies who regularly submit requests for consultation, as well as to those who submit individual requests that do not contain sufficient information to allow adequate evaluation. This form is for discretionary use, and may be modified as necessary. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703-712) prohibits the taking, killing, possession, transportation, and importation of migratory birds, their eggs, parts, and nests, except when specifically authorized by the Department of the Interior. While the Act has no provision for allowing unauthorized take, it must be recognized that some birds may be killed at structures such as communications towers even if all reasonable measures to avoid it are implemented. The Service's Division of Law Enforcement carries out its mission to protect migratory birds not only through investigations and enforcement, but also through fostering relationships with individuals and industries that proactively seek to eliminate their impacts on migratory birds. While it is not possible under the Act to absolve individuals or companies from liability if they follow these recommended guidelines, the Division of Law Enforcement and Department of Justice have used enforcement and prosecutorial discretion in the past regarding individuals or companies who have made good faith efforts to avoid the take of migratory birds. Please ensure that all field personnel involved in review of FCC licensed communications tower proposals receive copies of this memorandum. Questions regarding this issue should be directed to Dr. Benjamin Tuggle, Chief, Division of Habitat Conservation, at (703)358-2161, or Jon Andrew, Chief, Division of Migratory Bird Management, at (703)3 58-1714. These guidelines will be incorporated in a Director's Order and placed in the Fish and Wildlife Service Manual at a future date. Service Interim Guidelines For Recommendations On Communications Tower Siting, Construction, Operation, and Decommissioning 1. Any company/applicant/licensee proposing to construct a new communications tower should be strongly encouraged to collocate the communications equipment on an existing communication tower or other structure (e.g., billboard, water tower, or building mount). Depending on tower load factors, from 6 to 10 providers may collocate on an existing tower. 2. 1f collocation is not feasible and a new tower or towers are to be constructed, communications service providers should be strongly encouraged to construct towers no more than 199 feet above ground level (AGL), using construction techniques which do not require guy wires (e.g., use a lattice structure, monopole, etc.). Such towers should be unlighted if Federal Aviation Administration regulations permit. 3. If constructing multiple towers, providers should consider the cumulative impacts of all of those towers to migratory birds and threatened and endangered species as well as the impacts of each individual tower. 4. If at all possible, new towers should be sited within existing "antenna farms" (clusters of towers). Towers should not be sited in or near wetlands, other known bird concentration areas (e.g., state or Federal refuges, staging areas, rookeries), in known migratory or daily movement flyways, or in habitat of threatened or endangered species. Towers should not be sited in areas with a high incidence of fog, mist, and low ceilings. 5. If taller (>199 feet AGL) towers requiring lights for aviation safety must be constructed, the minimum amount of pilot warning and obstruction avoidance lighting required by the FAA should be used. Unless otherwise required by the FAA, only white (preferable) or red strobe lights should be used at night, and these should be the minimum number, minimum intensity, and minimum number of flashes per minute (longest duration between flashes) allowable by the FAA. The use of solid red or pulsating red warning lights at night should be avoided. Current research indicates that solid or pulsating (beacon) red lights attract night -migrating birds at a much higher rate than white strobe lights. Red strobe lights have not yet been studied. C. Tower designs using guy wires for support which are proposed to be located in known raptor or waterbird concentration areas or daily movement routes, or in major diurnal migratory bird movement routes or stopover sites, should have daytime visual markers on the wires to prevent collisions by these diurnally moving species. (For guidance on markers, see Avian Power Line Interaction Committee (APLIC). 1994. Mitigating .Bird Collisions with Power Lines: The State of the Art in 1994. Edison Electric Institute, Washington, D. C., 78 pp, and Avian Power Line Interaction Committee (APLIC). 1996. Suggested Practices for Raptor Protection on Power Lines. Edison Electric Institute/Raptor Research Foundation, Washington, D. C., 128 pp. Copies can be obtained via the Internet at http://www.eei.org/resources/pubeat/enviro/, or by calling 1- 800/334-5453). 7. Towers and appendant facilities should be sited, designed and constructed so as to avoid or minimize habitat loss within and adjacent to the tower "footprint". However, a larger tower footprint is preferable to the use of guy wires in construction. Road access and fencing should be minimized to reduce or prevent habitat fragmentation and disturbance, and to reduce above ground obstacles to birds in flight. 8. If significant numbers of breeding, feeding, or roosting birds are known to habitually use the proposed tower construction area, relocation to an alternate site should be recommended. If this is not an option, seasonal restrictions on construction may be advisable in order to avoid disturbance during periods of high bird activity. 9. In order to reduce the number of towers needed in the future, providers should be encouraged to design new towers structurally and electrically to accommodate the applicant/licensee's antennas and comparable antennas for at least two additional users (minimum of three users for each tower structure), unless this design would require the addition of lights or guy wires to an otherwise unlighted and/or unguyed tower. 10. Security lighting for on -ground facilities and equipment should be down -shielded to keep light within the boundaries of the site. 11. If a tower is constructed or proposed for construction, Service personnel or researchers from the Communication Tower Working Group should be allowed access to the site to evaluate bird use, conduct dead -bird searches, to place net catchments below the towers but above the ground, and to place radar, Global Positioning System, infrared, thermal imagery, and acoustical monitoring equipment as necessary to assess and verify bird movements and to gain information on the impacts of various tower sizes, configurations, and lighting systems. 12, Towers no longer in use or determined to be obsolete should be removed within 12 months of cessation of use. In order to obtain information on the extent to which these guidelines are being implemented, and to identify any recurring problems with their implementation which may necessitate modifications, letters provided in response to requests for evaluation of proposed towers should contain the following request: "In order to obtain information on the usefulness of these guidelines in preventing bird strikes, and to identify any recurring problems with their implementation which may necessitate modifications, please advise us of the final location and specifications of the proposed tower, and which of the measures recommended for the protection of migratory birds were implemented. If any of the recommended measures can not be implemented, please explain why they were not feasible." Return to Hance Pate III ''`'f United States Department of the Interior F � VICE F�, • \11ri� seRuios u, ri -% FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE R, Virginia Ecological Services Field Office' 6669 SHORT LANE''our-,`'' GLOUCESTER, VA 23061 PHONE: (804)693-6694 FAX: (804)693-9032 URL: www.fws.gov/northeast/virginiafteld/ Consultation Code: 05E2VA00-2015-SLI-2920 July 30, 2015 Event Code: 05E2VA00-2015-E-03031 Project Name: Hollins Road Tower Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project To Whom It May Concern: The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 etseq.). New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list. The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or designated critical habitat. A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human enviromnent as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12. If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at: http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/eaglc_guidance.htm]). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and bats. Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentB ]rdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://www.towerkill.com; and httpJ/www.fws.gov/lnigratorybirds/CuiTentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/comtow.html. We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit to our office. Attachment 2 •, vs. United States Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Project narne: Hollins. Road Tower Official Species List Provided by: Virginia Ecological Services Field Office 6669 SHORT LANE GLOUCESTER, VA 23061 (804)693-6694 http://www.fws.gov/noilheast/virginiaficid/ Consultation Code: 05E2VA00-2015-SLI-2920 Event Code: 05E2VA00-2015-E-03031 Project Type: COMMUNICATIONS TOWER Project Name: Hollins Road Tower Project Description: construction of a 195 -ft monopole within a 75 -ft x 75 -ft compound with new access road and utility easement. Please Note: The FWS office may have modified the Project Name and/or Project Description, so it may be different from what was submitted in your previous request. If the Consultation Code matches, the FWS considers this to be the same project. Contact the office in the 'Provided by' section of your previous Official Species list if you have any questions or concerns. http://ccos.fws.gov/ipac, 07/30/2015 01:16 PM 1 United States Department of Interior SSRVIOH Fish and Wildlife Service Project name: Hollins Road. Tower Project Location Map: n Project Coordinates: WLTIPOLYGON (((-79.92522704607836 37.3297100379092, - 79.9252849817276 37.32912053434762, -79.92558109766833 37.32913162489907, - 79.92559397223886 37.329099206379496, -79.92564493421014 37.3291073109944 1, - 79.92564976215363 37.3291546591361, -79.92533326148987 37.32914186234222, - 7992526888847351 37.329717715908174, -79.92522704607836 37.3297100379092))) Project Counties: Roanoke, VA http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac, 07130/2015 01:16 PM 2 Endangered Species Act Species List There are a total of 3 threatened or endangered species on your species list. Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. Critical habitats listed under the Has Critical Habitat column may or may not lie within your project area. See the Critical habitats within your project area section further below for critical habitat that ties within your project. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions. Fishes seemoe United States Department of Interior Condition(s) Roanoke logperch (Percina rex) Population: Entire Endangered Fish and Wildlife Service Mammals Project name: Hollins Road Tower Endangered Species Act Species List There are a total of 3 threatened or endangered species on your species list. Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. Critical habitats listed under the Has Critical Habitat column may or may not lie within your project area. See the Critical habitats within your project area section further below for critical habitat that ties within your project. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions. Fishes Status Has Critical Habitat Condition(s) Roanoke logperch (Percina rex) Population: Entire Endangered Mammals Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) Population: Entire Endangered Northern long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis) Threatened http:llecos.fws.gov/ipac, 07/30/2015 01:16 PM 3 "�:. aorta tiunura Sa�Hoa United States Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Project name: Hollins Road Tower Critical habitats that lie within your project area There are no critical habitats within your project area. http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac, 07/30/2015 01:16 PM 4 Appendix C SHFO Clearance Letter e -Form 620 Mead & Hunt, lnc. R4021600-155994.01 Teresa Schuller From: towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 4:45 PM To: Teresa Schuller Subject: Section 106 Notification of SHPO/THPO Concurrence- Email ID #1376382 This is to notify you that the Lead SHPO/THPO has concurred with the following filing: Date of Action: 08/28/2015 Direct Effect: No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE Visual Effect: No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE Comment Text: We believe that the undertaking will have No Adverse Effect on historic properties listed in or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, specifically the Rudd House (080-0417) and the Christian Nininger House (080-0034). Chris Novelli Virginia Department of Historic Resources File Number: 0006895738 TCNS Number: 129587 Purpose: Update Original Purpose: New Tower Submission Packet Notification Date: 7AM EST 08/06/2015 Applicant: Apex Towers, LLC Consultant: Mead & Hunt, Inc. Positive Train Control Filing Subject to Expedited Treatment Under Program Comment: No Site Name: Hollins Road (VAROHRI) Site Address: Hollins Road Detailed Description of Project: Site Coordinates: 37-19-44.9 N, 79-55-32.5 W City: Roanoke County: ROANOKE State:VA Lead SHPO/THPO: Virginia Department of Historic Resources NOTICE OF FRAUDULENT USE OF SYSTEM, ABUSE OF PASSWORD AND RELATED MISUSE Use of the Section 106 system is intended to facilitate consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable laws. Any person having access to Section 106 information shall use it only for its intended purpose. Appropriate action will be taken with respect to any misuse of the system. FCC Form 620 Notification Date: 7AM EST 08/06/2015 File Number. 0006895738 FCC Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Approved by OMB New Tower ("NT") Submission Packet 3060-1039 See instructions for public burden estimates General Information 1) (Select only one) ( UA ) NE — New UA — Update of Application WD — Withdrawal of Application 2) It this application is for an Update or Withdrawal, enter the file number of the pending application File Number: 0006895738 currently on file. ucant Inrormaiion 3) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 0024458069 4) Name: Apex Towers, LLC Contact Name 6) First Name: David 6) MI: 7) Last Name: McClure :1 E)nUffix-1 9) Title: Rnnforef Infnrmnfinn 10) P.O. Box: 7nd 11) Street Address: 125 Whitestick Road 12) City: Beckley 13) State: WV 14) Zip Code: 25801 15) Telephone Number: (304)256-6428 P16)Faxmber: (304)252.1852 17) E-mail Address: dmcclure@apex4owers.com Consultant Information 18) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 0018554238 19) Name: Mead & Hunt, Inc. Principal Investigator 20) First Name: Teresa 21) MI: F22)ast Name: Schuller 23) Suffix: 24) Title: Drinrinnl invnctinafnr [_nnfart Infnrmatinn 25) P.O. Box: load 26) Street Address: 400 Tracy Way Suite 200 27) City: Charleston 28) State: WV 29) Zip Code: 25311 30) Telephone Number: (681)313-4617 P31)F,,mber: 32) E-mail Address: teresa.schuller@meadhunt.com 1 of 19 FCC Fomn 620 Prnfecclnnal Dualifiration 33) Does the Principal Investigator satisfy the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards? I (X )yes ( ) No 34) Areas of Professional Qualification: ( } Archaeologist ( ) Architectural Historian ( ) Historian ( ) Architect ( X ) Other (Specify) environmental 35) Are there other staff involved who meet the Professional Qualification Standards of the Secretary of the Interior? ( X ) Yes ( ) No If "VPC " rmmniata the fnilnwinn- 36) First Name: Diana 37) MI: 38) Last Name: Welling 39) Suffix: 40) Title: 41) Areas of Professional Qualification: ( ) Archaeologist ( X ) Architectural Historian ( ) Historian { ) Architect ( ) Other (Specify) 36) First Name: Justin 37) Mt: 38) Last Name: Zink 39) Suffix: 40) Title: 41) Areas of Professional Qualification: { X ) Archaeologist ( ) Architectural Historian { ) Historian ( ) Architect ( ) Other (Specify) 2 of 19 FCC Form 620 Site Information ower Construction Notification System 1)TCNS Notification Number: 129587 Sifn Infnrmafinn 2) Positive Train Control Filing Subject to Expedited Treatment Under Program Comment: ( ) Yes ( X ) t o 3) Site Name: Hollins Road (VAROHRI ) 4) Site Address: Hollins Road 5) Detailed Description of Project: 6) City: Roanoke 7) State: VA 8) zip Code: 24019 9) County/Borough/Parish: ROANOKE 10) Nearest Crossroads: Hollins Road and Lois Lane (AKA Carlos Drive) 11) NAD 83 Latitude (DD-MM-SS.S): 37-19-44.9 ( X )Nor ( ) S 12) NAD 83 Longitude (DD-MM-SS.S): 079.55-32.5 ( ) E or ( X ) W Tower Information 13) Tower height above ground level (include top -mounted attachments such as lightning rods): 60.7 ( ) Feet ( X ) Meters 14) Tower Type (Select One): ( ) Guyed lattice tower ( ) Self-supporting lattice ( X } Monopole ( ) Other (Describe): arojecs otaius 15) Current Project Status (Select One): ( X ) Construction has not yet commenced ( ) Construction has commenced, but is not completed Construction commenced on: ( ) Construction has been completed Construction commenced on: Construction completed on: 3 of 19 FCC Fonu 620 a ._-. - A ❑PtPrmination of Effect 94) Direct Effects (Select One): ( ) No Historic Properties in Area of Potential Effects (APE) ( ) No Effect on Historic Properties in APE ( X ) No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on one or more Historic Properties in APE 15) Visual Effects (Select One): ( ) No Historic Properties in Area of Potential Effects (APE) ( ) No Effect on Historic Properties in APE ( X ) No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on one or more Historic Properties in APE 4 of 19 FCC Form 620 Tribal/NHO involvement ............ 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the API=s for direct and visual ( X ) Yes ( ) No effects? 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: 129587 Number of TribeslNHOS: 5 2b) Tribes/NHOS contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: 0 I riDelNHV Contacted i nrou n I i N5 3) TribelNHO FRN: 4) TribelNHO Name: Catawba Indian Nation Cultural Preservation Project Contact Name 5) First Name: Dr. Wenonah 6) MI: G 7) Last Name: Haire 8) Suffix: 9)Title: THPO and Executive Director LIMUZ, a F%WJF VIMW 10) Date Contacted 0713012015 11 } Date Replied ( X } No Reply ( } Replied/No Interest ( } Replied/Have Interest ( } Replied/Other TribelNHO Contacted t nrougn I UN5 3) TribelNHO FRN: 4) TribelNHo Name: Delaware Nation Contact Name 5) First Name: Nekole 6) MI: T Last Name: Alligood 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Cultural Preservation Director uates & rtes onse 10) Date Contacted 07/30/2015 11) Date Replied ( X ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( } Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other 5 of 19 FCC Form 620 Tribal/NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual ( X ) Yes ( } No effects? 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: 129557 Number of Tribes/NHOs: 5 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: 0 i rinerNHU t;ontactea i nrou n i ,ima 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) TribelNHO Name: Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma Contact Name 5) First Name: Robin 6) MI: 7) Last Name: Dushane 8) Suffix: 9) Title: THPO Oates & rtesponse 10) Date Contacted 07/30/2015 11) Date Replied 07/3112015 { ) No Reply { ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( X ) Replied/Other Trib@1NHU GontaMOCI i nrou n I tans 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Shawnee Tribe Contact Name 5) First Name: Kim 6) MI: 7) Last Name: Jumper T8) Suffix: 9) Title: THPO uates a rtes once 10) Date Contacted 07130/2015 11) Date Replied { X ) No Reply { } Replied/No Interest ( } Replied/Have Interest ( } Replied/Other 6 of 19 PCC Form 620 Triba[/NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual ( X ) Yes ( ) Na effects? 2a) TribeslNHOs contacted through TONS Notification Number: 129587 Number of Tribes/NHOs: 5 2b) TribeslNHOS contacted through an alternate system: Number of TribeslNHOS: fi f nDG1NMV C:ontactea I nrou n 1 t;fYS 3) Tribe/NHO FIRM 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Tuscarora Nation Contact Name 5) First Name: Leo 6) MI: R 7) Last Name: Henry T8) Suffix: 9) Title: Chief nates & Kesponse 10) Date Contacted 0713012015 11) bate Replied ( X ) No Reply ( ) RepliedlNo Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other 7 of 19 FCC t'onu 620 A 1-1 1111 Other Tribes/NHOs Contacted Tri be1N HO I nfermatie n 1) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 2) Name: Cnntart Names 3) First Name: 4) MI: 5) Last Name: 6) Suffix: 7) Title: f'-#-+ Inf_r fln 8) P.O. Box: And 9) Street Address: 10) City: 11) State: 12) Zip Code: 13) Telephone Number: 14) Fax Number: 15) E-mail Address: 16) Preferred means of communication: ( ) E-mail ( ) Letter ( ) Both Dates & Response 17) Date Contacted 18) Date Replied ( } No Reply ( ) Replied[No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other 8 of 19 FCC Form 620 R T-.. 1A 4 A Historic Properties 1) Have any historic properties been identified within the APES for direct and visual effect? ( X ) Yes ( ) No 2) Has the identification process located archaeological materials that would be directly affected, or sites that are of { )yes ( X ) No cultural or religious significance to Tribes/NHOs? 3) Are there more than 10 historic properties within the APES for direct and visual effect? { )yes ( X ) No If "Yes", you are required to attach a Cultural Resources Report in lieu of adding the Historic Property below. listoric Property 4) Property Name: Mountain View School 5) SHPO Site Number: 080-0393 Property Address 6) Street Address: Lois Lane 7) City: Roanoke 8) State: VA 9) Zip Code: 24019 10) CountylBorough/Parish: ROANOKE Css..a p C1. iMiirfar 11) Is this property listed on the National Register? Source: ( ) Yes ( X ) No 12) Is this property eligible for listing on the National Register? Source: ( ) Yes ( X ) No 13) Is this property a National Historic Landmark? ( ) Yes ( X ) No 14) Direct Effects (Select One): ( X ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 15) Visual Effects (Select One): ( X ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE { ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE { ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 9 of 19 FCC Form 620 Historic Properties PrnnarHac Irlanfifiarl 1) Have any historic properties been identified within the APEs for direct and visual effect? ( X ) Yes ( ) No 2) Has the identification process located archaeological materials that would be directly affected, or sites that are of ( ) Yes ( X ) No cultural or religious significance to Tribes/NHOs? 3) Are there more than 10 historic properties within the APES for direct and visual effect? ( ) Yes ( X ) No If "Yes", you are required to attach a Cultural Resources Report in lieu of adding the Historic Property below. Istoric Property 4) Property Name: Andrew Huff House 5) SHPO Site Number: 080-0015 Property Address 6) Street Address: Rt 601 7) City: Roanoke 8) State: VA 9) Zip Code: 24019 10) County/Borough/Parish: ROANOKE C4a+110 R 1:11nihili4tr 11) Is this property listed on the National Register? Source: ( )Yes ( X ) No 12) Is this property eligible for listing on the National Register? Source: CRM denotes demolished in 2006 ( X ) Yes ( ) No 13) Is this property a National Historic Landmark? ( ) Yes ( X ) No 14) Direct Effects (Select One): ( X ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 15) Visual Effects (Select One): ( X ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( } No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 16 of 19 FCC Force 620 Historic Properties Prn11PMac Irlantiflarl 1) Have any historic properties been identified within the APES for direct and visual effect? ( X ) Yes ( ) No 2) Has the identification process located archaeological materials that would be directly affected, or sites that are of ( )Yes (X ) No cultural or religious significance to Tribes/NHOs? 3) Are there more than 10 historic properties within the APES for direct and visual effect? ( )yes ( X ) No If "Yes", you are required to attach a Cultural Resources Report in lieu of adding the Historic Property below. istoric Property 4) Property Name: Christian Nininger house 5) SHPO Site Number: 080-0034 Property Address 6) Street Address: Plantation Road Rt 118 7) City: Roanoke 8) State: VA 9) Zip Code: 24019 10) County/Borough/Parish: ROANOKE Qf2fl e R plinihilihr 11) Is this property listed on the National Register? Source: ( ) Yes ( X ) No 12) Is this property eligible for listing on the National Register? Source: potentially eligible based upon DHR review on 917193 ( X ) Yes ( ) No 13) is this property a National Historic Landmark? ( ) Yes ( X ) No 14) direct Effects (Select One): ( ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( X ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 15) Visual Effects (Select One): ( ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( X ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE I 1 of 19 FCC Form 620 aA....•.l A Historic Properties Prnnprtiac IripntifiPti 1) Have any historic properties been identified within the APES for direct and visual effect? { X ) Yes ( ) No 2) Has the identification process located archaeological materials that would be directly affected, or sites that are of { )Yes (X ) No cultural or religious significance to Tribes/NHOs? 3) Are there more than 10 historic properties within the APES for direct and visual effect? ( ) Yes ( X ) No If "Yes", you are required to attach a Cultural Resources Report in lieu of adding the Historic Property below. listoric Property 4) Property Name: House 5) SHPO Site Number: 080-0394 Property Address B) Street Address: Lois Lane 7) City: roanoke 8) State: VA 9) Zip Code: 24019 10) CountylBoroughlParish: ROANOKE SfAhic R Plinihilifu 11) Is this property listed on the National Register? Source: ( ) Yes ( X ) No 12) Is this property eligible for listing on the National Register? Source: ( )yes ( X ) No 13) Is this property a National Historic Landmark? ( ) Yes ( X ) No 14) Direct Effects (Select Ono): ( X ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 15) Visual Effects (Select One): ( X ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 12 of 19 FCC Form 620 x e__. — R Historic Properties PrnnerflPg IdP_ntifirnd 1) Have any historic properties been identified within the APES for direct and visual effect? ( X ) Yes ( ) No 2) Has the identification process located archaeological materials that would be directly affected, or sites that are of ( )Yes (X ) No cultural or religious significance to Tribes/NHOs? 3) Are there more than 10 historic properties within the APEs for direct and visual effect? "Yes", ( ) Yes (X ) No If you are required to attach a Cultural Resources Report in lieu of adding the Historic Property below. istoric Property 4) Property Name: House 5) SHPO Site Number: 080-0406 roperoperty Address 6) Street Address: Old Mountain Road 7) City: Roanoke 8) State: VA 9) Zip Code: 24019 10) CountylBoroughlParish: ROANOKE Statim R Plinihility 11) Is this property listed on the National Register? Source: ( ) Yes ( X ) No 12) Is this property eligible for listing on the National Register? Source: ( )Yes ( X ) No 13) Is this property a National Historic Landmark? ( ) Yes ( X ) No 14) Direct Effects (Select One): ( X ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 15) Visual Effects (Select One): ( X ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 13 of 19 FCC Fomi 620 r. A... 1n 3 A Historic Properties Drn..nrFinc Irinnfifinel 1) Have any historic properties been identified within the APEs for direct and visual effect? { X )yes ( ) No 2) Has the identification process located archaeological materials that would be directly affected, or sites that are of { )yes ( X ) No cultural or religious significance to Tribes/NHos? 3) Are there more than 10 historic properties within the APES for direct and visual effect? { ) Yes ( X ) No If "Yes", you are required to attach a Cultural Resources Report in lieu of adding the Historic Property below. Istoric Property 4) Property Name: Rudd House 5) SHPO Site Number: 080-0417 Property Address 6) Street Address: Plantation Road 7) City: Roanoke 8) State: VA 9) Zip Code: 24019 10) CountylBoroughlParish: ROANOKE Y. C1lnlhflli., 11) Is this property listed on the National Register? Source: ( )yes ( X ) No 12) Is this property eligible for listing on the National Register? Source: eligible by OHR evaluation committee on 919193 ( X ) Yes ( ) No 13) Is this property a National Historic Landmark? ( ) Yes ( X ) No 14) Direct Effects (Select One): ( ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( X ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE { ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 15) Visual Effects (Select One): ( } No Effect on this Historic Property in APE { X } No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( } Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 14 of 19 FCC Foran 620 Local Government Involvement -ocai government Agency 1) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 2) Name: Roanoke County Planning and Zoning Commission Contact Name 3) First Name: Wayne 4) MI: 5) Last Name: Bower 6) Suffix: 7) Title: 8) P.O. Box: 29800 IO d 9) Street Address: 10) City: Roanoke 11) State: VA 12) Zip Code: 24018.0798 13) Telephone Number: (540)772-2006 P14)F,,mber: 15) E-mail Address: wbower@roanokecountyva.gov 16) Preferred means of communication: ( X )E-mail ( ) Letter ( ) Both Dates & Response 17) Date Contacted 07/3012015 18) Date Replied 07/30/2015 ( ) No Reply { ) Replied/No Interest { ) Replied/Have Interest ( X) Replied/Other No reposne yet. Their response, if any, will be uploaded to this application. 19) Information on local government's role or interest (optional): Planning commission for this area. 15 of 19 FCC Form 620 w A--. i n t A Local Government Involvement -ocai Government 1) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 2) Name: History Museum of Western Virginia Contact damp 3) First Name: Linda 4) MI: 5) Last Name: Steele 6) Suffix: 7) Title: L`nn+aM infnrmn inn 8) P.D. Box: PO Box 1940 /Ord 9) Street Address: 1o) City: Roanoke 11) State: VA 12) Zip Code: 24008 13) Telephone Number: (540)342.5770 P14)FxNmber 15) E-mail Address: registrar@vahistorymuseum.org 16) Preferred means of communication: ( X) E-mail ( ) Letter { ) Both )ates u 17) Date Contacted 07/30/2015 18) Date Replied 07/30/2015 { ) No Reply { ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( X) Replied/Other No rely yet. Their response, if any, will be uploaded to this application. Additional Information 19) Information on local government's role or interest (optional): local historical group 16 of 14 FCC Font 620 R —. 1A 1 A Other Consulting Parties utner Consuiting Parties Contacted 1 }Has any other agency been contacted and invited to become a consulting party? { }Yes ( X } No 2) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 3) Name: Contact Name 4) First Name: 5) Ml: 6) Last Name: T7) Suffix: 8) Title: 9) P.O. Box: 10 d 10) Street Address: 11) City: 12) State: 13) Zip Code: 14) Telephone Number: 15) Fax Number: 16) E-mail Address: 17) Preferred means of communication: ( ) E-mail { ) Letter ( } Both )ates & Response 18) Date Contacted 19) Date Replied ( } No Reply { ) RepliedlNo Interest ( ) Replied/Nave Interest { ) Replied/Other Arlrlitinnal Information 20) Information on other consulting parties' role or interest (optional): 17 of 19 FCC Form 620 Designation of SHPOITHPO 1) Designate the Lead State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) or Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO) based on the location of the tower. SHPO/THPO Name: Virginia Department of Historic Resources 2) You may also designate up to three additional SHPOsITHPOs if the APES include multiple states. If the APES include other countries, enter the name of the National Historic Preservation Agency and any state and provincial Historic Preservation Agency. SHPO/THPO Name: SHPO/THPO Name: SHPOITHPO Name: Certification certify that all representations on this FCC Form 620 Submission Packet and the accompanying attachments are true, correct, and complete. Party Authorized to Sign First Name: Teresa MI: Last Name: Schuller Suffix: Signature: Teresa Schuller Date: 08/05/2015 FAILURE TO SIGN THIS APPLICATION MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE APPLICATION AND FORFEITURE OF ANY FEES PAID. WILLFUL FALSE STATEMENTS MADE ON THIS FORM OR ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND/OR IMPRISONMENT (U.S. Code, Title 18, Section 1001) AND/OR REVOCATION OF ANY STATION LICENSE OR CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (U.S. Code, Title 47, Section 312(a)(1)), AND/OR FORFEITURE (U.S. Code, Title 47, Section 503). 18 of 19 FCC Poen 620 Attachments : Type ResumesfVitae Map Documents Area of Potential Effects Tribal/NHO Involvement Local Government Involvement Local Government Involvement Public Involvement Historic Properties for Direct Effects Historic Properties for Visual Effects Photographs Cultural Resources Report Tribal/NHO Involvement Public Involvement Historic Properties for Visual Effects Description Date Entered 3 resumes 07/30/2015 site clan 07130/2015 Topo map with APE 07/30/2015 TONS 129587 07/30/2015 historical society reeauesl letterino attachments 07/30/2015 Roanoke Co Planning commission reouest/no 07/3012015 attachments Leaal act for Roanoke Times 07/30/2015 Fuil arch report 07/3012015 Visual effects portion of report 0713012015 site photos 07/30/2015 Full Cultural Rsources report 07130/2015 Notice of Organizations - THPOs 08/05/2015 Affidavit far legal notice 08/05/2015 Additionai Informatoin on Visih ity 08/05/2015 19 of 19 FCC Font 620 %/_._-A Meed Ilural, Im M e a d Ai & EI Ar( hlEv kov. Ili- 1011lra,y YY.ry, Wile 211!1 p 311'r,iVlfl;lllL,>>31I \\ lunt04-31', �W I1 „..,,n}Ilfll ,.l„ 5 August 2015 Additional Information requested on Views of Tower from Historic Structures Hollins Road Tower Site, Roanoke, VA A 30 July 2015 email from the FCC for this tower's e -Farm 620 filing requested balloon test photos form these structures showing that the tower will not be visible. Based upon the architectural historian's site visit, most of these sites are in dense woods, which preclude a balloon launch. The ones are on private land, for which we do not have access. To address the question of visibility, Mead & Hunt prepared line -of -sight profiles (which not account for buildings or trees/vegetation) with Google Earth maps. The structures and comments are: 080-0393 — demolished 080-0015 - demolished 080-0394 — dense trees immediately surrounding; tower not visible 080-0406 — dense trees immediately surrounding; tower not visible 080-0417 -- large barn/outbuilding and mature trees screen the view 080-0034 — barely touched the approximate boundary line. The boundary is a row of mature trees and a small ridge block the view. These profiles and Google maps were provided to the historian who indicated that the results substantiated the statements already made in the cultural resources report. 1300 125 1200 1150 1100 c 1050 0 ital distance: 1597 feet •ound distance: 1610 feet Miles Climbing: 64 feet Elevation change: -30 feet Descending: -95 feet Min/Max: 1030/1096 Line -of -site figure for 080-0394. Software does not include trees or other vegetation. Proposed cell tower will not be visible from this resource due dense woods surrounding the property (see attached Google Earth shot). Tree height is typically between 60-80 ft in mature forest. Go sic earth feet 200 Illp- meters 80 Google Earth Proposed cell due to dense difficult to shot for 080-0394. tower will not be visible forest closely surrounding locate the property. from this resource the property. It was C;Ok,glearth feet 200 meters $0 Google Earth shot for 080-0394. Proposed cell tower will not be visible from this resource due to dense forest closely surrounding the property. It was difficult to locate the property. 1300 1250' 1200 1150 1100 1050} dal distance: 'ound distance Miles 1231 feet Climbing: 101 feet Elevation change: 98 feet Descending: -2 feet Min/Max: 1061/1159 1239 feet Line -of -site figure for 080-0406. Software does not include trees or other vegetation. Proposed cell tower will not be visible from this resource due dense woods surrounding the property (see attached Google Earth shot). Tree height is typically between 60-80 ft in mature forest. Google eath feet 600 meters 100 jlr Google Earth Proposed cell due to dense difficult to shot for 080-0405. tower will not be visible from this resource forest closely surrounding the property. It was locate the property. 12501 1200' 1150 1100 C 1050 100th Miles ftai distance: 2686 feet Climbing: 137 feet Elevation change: 32 feet Descending: -105 feet Min/Max: 1009/1100 -ound distance: 2707 feet Line -of -site figure for 080-0417. Software does not include trees or other vegetation. Proposed cell tower will not be visible from this resource due larger outbuilding screening its view as well as the trees near the house (see attached Google Earth shot). Tree height is typicall between 60-80 ft in mature forest. i proposed tower N. - direction ~ r Owl n Its i Alt '4W r •� l r 0�2�1 5 Google " - �,," Go ( I - ear Goosle earth 1300 1250 1200 1150 1100 1050 0 Ral distance: 2926 feet 'aund distance: 2945 feet Miles Climbing: 111 feet Elevation change: -29 feet Descending: -140 feet Min/Max: 1026/1106 Line -of -site figure for 080-0034. Software does not include trees or other vegetation. Proposed cell tower will not be visible from this resource due to the small ridge blocking the view. Appendix D THPO Clearance Letters Phase I Archaeology Survey Report Mead & Hunt, 1uc. R4021600-155994.01 Teresa Schuller From: Sent: To: Subject: Dear Teresa A Schuller, towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Friday, July 24, 2015 12:58 PM Teresa Schuller Proposed Tower Structure Info - Email ID #4291520 Thank you for submitting a notification regarding your proposed construction via the Tower Construction Notification System. Note that the system has assigned a unique Notification ID number for this proposed construction. You will need to reference this Notification ID number when you update your project's Status with us. Below are the details you provided for the construction you have proposed: Notification Received: 07/24/2015 Notification ID: 129587 Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: Apex Towers Consultant Name: Teresa A Schuller Street Address: 400 Tracy Way, Suite 200 City: Charleston State: WEST VIRGINIA Zip Code: 25311 Phone: 681-313-4617 Email: teresa.schuller@meadhunt.com Structure Type: MTOWER - Monopole Latitude: 37 deg 19 min 44.9 sec N Longitude: 79 deg 55 min 32,5 sec W Location Description: Hollins Road City: Roanoke State. VIRGINIA County: ROANOKE Detailed Description of Project: Proposed construction of a 199 -ft (including 4 -ft Iightning rod) monopole tower and equipment shelter within a 100 -ft by 100 -ft. ]eased area. Access road and utility corridor will be constructed. Ground Elevation: 317.7 meters Support Structure: 59.4 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 60.7 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 378.4 meters above mean sea level Teresa Schuller From: towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 3:01 AM To: Teresa Schuller Cc: Jonathan.Jonas@fcc.gov; diane.dupert@fcc.gov Subject: NOTICE OF ORGANIZATIONS) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWER CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION INFORMATION - Email ID #4293142 Dear Sir or Madam: Thank you for using the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System (TONS). The purpose of this electronic mail message is to inform you that the following authorized persons were sent the information you provided through TCNS, which relates to your proposed antenna structure. The information was forwarded by the FCC to authorized TCNS users by electronic mail and/or regular mail (letter). Persons who have received the information that you provided include leaders or their designees of federally - recognized American Indian Tribes, including Alaska Native Villages (collectively "Tribal Nations"), Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs), and State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPOs). For your convenience in identifying the referenced Tribal Nations and NHOs and in making further contacts, the City and State of the Seat of Government for each Tribal Nation and NHO, as well as the designated contact person, is included in the listing below. We note that Tribal Nations may have Section 106 cultural interests in ancestral homelands or other locations that are far removed from their current Seat of Government. Pursuant to the Commission's rules as set forth in the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic Properties for Certain Undertakings Approved by the Federal Communications Commission (NPA), all Tribal Nations and NHOs listed below must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to respond to this notification, consistent with the procedures set forth below, unless the proposed construction falls within an exclusion designated by the Tribal Nation or NHO. (NPA, Section IV.F.4). The information you provided was forwarded to the following Tribal Nations and NHOs. If a Tribal Nation or NHO does not respond within a reasonable time, you should make a reasonable effort at follow-up contact, unless the Tribal Nation or NHO has agreed to different procedures (NPA, Section IV.17.5). In the event a Tribal Nation or NHO does not respond to a follow-up inquiry, or if a substantive or procedural disagreement arises between you and a Tribal Nation or NHO, you must seek guidance from the Commission (NPA, Section IV.G). These procedures are further set forth in the FCC's Declaratory Ruling released on October 6, 2005 (FCC 05- 176). 1. Cultural Preservation Director Nekole Alligood - Delaware Nation - Anadarko, OK - regular mail Details: The Delaware Nation located in Anadarko, Oklahoma charges a $500 administrative fee for the review of ALL projects. (Change Effective 5121/2013). Send fee payable to the Delaware Nation in the form of a check or money order. All projects for review by the Delaware Nation must pay the $500 fee. Please note that the Delaware Nation and the Delaware Tribe of Indians ARE NOT the same enitity. Send all correspondence for the Delaware Nation to The Delaware Nation ATTN: Cultural Preservation Department 31064 State Hwy 281 Anadarko, OK 73005. 2. Chief Leo R Henry - Tuscarora Nation - Via; Lewiston, NY - regular mail Details: If the Applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Tuscarora Nation within 30 days after notification through TCNS, the Tuscarora Nation has no interest in participating in pre -construction review for the site. The Applicant/tower builder, however, must IMMEDIATLY notify the Tuscarora Nation in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction. 3. THPO Robin Dushane - Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma - Wyandotte, OK - regular mail Details: NOTE: CHANGE IN CONSULTATION PROCEDURES AND FEE The Cultural Preservation Office of the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma requires the following information and fees regarding all proposed FFC projects. Please do not email documentation; it will be deleted without being opened. Mail one printed color copy of all documentation accompanied with a CD version. Please submit by US postal mail or other parcel carrier all of the following information for all FCC projects: 1. A 1 -page cover letter with the following information: a) TCNS number b) Company name c) Project name, city, county, state d) Project type e) UTM coordinates using WGS84 (G1150) f) Total area surveyed in acres g) Contact information. 2. Professional cultural/archaeological resource survey report. 3. Aerial and color USGS topographic maps locating project area within the state, county, and local area. 4. Aerial, color USGS topographic, or planimetric maps locating tower site, APE, access road, utility easement, guy wire locations surveyed, surveyed staging areas, and known archaeological/historic sites. 5. Project site plan map depicting labeled shovel test locations. 6. Shovel test log. 7. Site photographs. 8. A copyof the review letter or TCNS e -response from the State Historic Preservation Office and all other state -mandated review offices. 9. Submit a $550.00 per/tower fee for administration, data processing, handling, research, and review. Collocations, PTC poles, and projects in previously disturbed locations require a $100.00 fee. Make the check payable to the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma. On the memo line write all TCNS numbers. NOTE: Effective November 1, 2014, for TCNS #119606 and forward, regarding collocations, PTC poles, and projects in previously disturbed locations; the administration, data processing, handling, research and review fee will decrease to $100.00. 10. THE EASTERN SHAWNEE TRIBE'S NEW CONSULTATION PROCEDURES DOCUMENT is availableby email and is highly recommended for guidance. Send an email to Dee Gardner at: celltower@estoo.net. If the applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma within 30 days after notification through TCNS, the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma has no interest in participating in pre -construction review for the proposed site. The Applicant/tower builder, howeve r, must immediately notify the Eastern Shawnee Trine of Oklahoma in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction, consistent with Section IX of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement and applicable law. 4. THPO Kim Jumper - Shawnee Tribe - Miami, OK - regular mail Details: THIS IS YOUR OFFICIAL NOTICE THAT THE SHAWNEE TRIBE IS INTERESTED IN CONSULTING ON ALL PROJECTS BUILT IN OUR AREAS OF GEOGRAPHIC INTEREST. ATTENTION, NEW INFORMATION: Our procedures were updated on 14 January 2008. Please call Kim Jumper, THPO, at 918-542-2441, so that she can send you a copy. If your tower is a co -location, please fax us this information to let us know. We cannot always tell from the TCNS web site that a tower is a co -location. We require a written response from you to let us know that it is a co -location. If a co -location project includes some new ground disturbance (such as from an expanded compound or access road, or construction of an ancillary structure), the Shawnee Tribe treats such a project the same as any other non co -location project. Our correct mailing/physical address is: 29 South Highway 69A. Our correct phone number is (918-542-2441) and our historic preservation fax line is (918-542-9915). THPO Kim Jumper manages all cell tower consultation. As of 26 June2006, all of the faxed responses of our final comments on a tower site will contain an original Shawnee Tribe signature. Each final comment fax is signed individually. Copies may be compared, for authentication, against the original in our files.If afinal comment fax does not contain a signature, it is not valid. ALL FINAL COMMENTS FROM THE SHAWNEE TRIBE ARE WRITTEN; FINAL COMMENTS ARE NEVER PROVIDED VERBALLY. IF THE SHAWNEE TRIBE IS CREDITED WITH HAVING GIVEN A VERBAL RESPONSE, THAT RESPONSE IS NOT VALID. If you receive notification through the TCNS listing the Shawnee Tribe, that is an indication that the Shawnee Tribe is interested in consulting on the tower for which that notification was received. Please consider that our official indication of interest to you. The Shawnee Tribe considers the Tower Construction Notification System's weekly e-mail to be the first notification that we receive that a tower will be constructed in an area of our concern. We do not view the TCNS notificationas completion of 106 consultation obligations. The Shawnee Tribe has developed streamlined consultation procedures for cell tower developers and their subcontractors. If you do not have a copy of the procedures - most recently updated on 14 January2008 - please contact us, as you must follow these procedures to consult with us on cell tower projects. Call us at 918-542- 2441 or fax us at 918-542-9915. It is the tower builder's responsibility to make sure that you have our most recent consultation procedures. PLEASE DO NOT SEND US INFORMATION, QUERIES, OR COMMENTS ELECTRONICALLY. SINCE 1 DECEMBER 2005, WE HAVE NOT HANDLED ANY CELL TOWER CONSULTATION, INQUIRIES, OR CORRESPONDENCE VIA E-MAIL. 5. THPO and Executive Director Dr. Wenonah G Haire - Catawba Indian Nation Cultural Preservation Project - Rock Hill, SC - electronic mail and regular mail Details: The Catawba Indian Nation Tribal Historic Preservation Office requests that you send us by regular mail the following information needed to complete our research for your proposed project (including ALL Positive Train Control (PTC) projects): Project Name 4 Project Num 1. The name, complete address, phone number, fax number and e-mail address of the project manager. 2. The project location plotted on a topo map. 3. The project name, address and location; street or highway, city, county, state. 4. A brief description of the proposed project. Please include the size of the proposed project site and the size of the area where ground -disturbing activities will be taking place and the type of disturbance anticipated. 5. A brief description of current and former land use. We are primarily interested in ground disturbance and do not need detailed information orphotographs of historic structures in the projectarea. 6. A list of all recorded archaeological sites within one half (112) mile of the project area. 7. A list of all eligible and potentially eligible National Register of Historic Places sites within one half (112) mile of the proposed project area. 8. If there has been an archaeological survey done in the area, a copy of that report. 9. It is not necessary to send original color photos if you can provide high-resolutioncolor copies. 10. A letter of concurrence from the appropriate State Historic Preservation Office. If you use the FCC Form 620, please do not send Attachments 1 through 6. They are not necessary for our determination. We do not have an interest in projects that require no ground disturbance. Please note: Our research/processing fee is $400. Please send these requested materials in hard copy format. Send to: CIN-THPO 1536 Tom Steven Road Rock Hill, S.C. 29730 The information you provided was also forwarded to the following SHPOs in the State in which you propose to construct and neighboring States. The information was provided to these SHPOs as a courtesy for their information and planning. You need make no effort at this time to follow up with any SHPO that does not respond to this notification. Prior to construction, you must provide the SHPO of the State in which you propose to construct (or the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, if the project will be located on certain Tribal lands), with a Submission Packet pursuant to Section VILA of the NPA. 6. Environmental Review Coordinator Renee GledhillEarley - NC State Historic Preservation Office - Raleigh, NC - electronic mail 7. Deputy SHPO David Brook - Historic Preservation Office - Raleigh, NC - electronic mail 8. Manager - Office of Review & Compliance Ethel R Eaton PhD - Department of Historic Resources - Richmond, VA - electronic mail 9. Deputy SHPO Susan Pierce - West Virginia Division of Culture & History, Historic Preservation Office - Charleston, WV - electronic mail 10. Director Julie Langan - Virginia Department of Historic Resources - Richmond, VA - electronic mail "Exclusions" above set forth language provided by the Tribal Nation or SHPO. These exclusions may indicate types of PTC wayside pole notifications that the Tribal Nation or SHPO does not wish to review. TCNS automatically forwards all notifications to all Tribal Nations and SHPOs that have an expressed interest in the geographic area of a proposal. However, if a proposal falls within a designated exclusion, you need not expect any response and need not pursue any additional process with that Tribal Nation or SHPO. Exclusions may also set forth policies or procedures of a particular Tribal Nation or SHPO (for example, types of information that a Tribal Nation routinely requests, or a policy that no response within 30 days indicates no interest in participating in pre -construction review). Please be advised that the FCC cannot guarantee that the contact(s) listed above opened and reviewed an electronic or regular mail notification. The following information relating to the proposed tower was forwarded to the person(s) listed above: Notification Received: 07/24/2015 Notification ID: 129587 Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: Apex Towers Consultant Name: Teresa A Schuller Street Address: 400 Tracy Way, Suite 200 City: Charleston State: WEST VIRGINIA Zip Code: 25311 Phone: 681-313-4617 Email: teresa.schuller@meadhunt.com Structure Type: MTOWER - Monopole Latitude: 37 deg 19 min 44.9 sec N Longitude: 79 deg 55 min 32.5 sec W Location Description: Hollins Road City: Roanoke State: VIRGINIA County: ROANOKE Detailed Description of Project: Proposed construction of a 199 -ft (including 4 -ft lightning rod) monopole tower and equipment shelter within a 100 -ft by 100 -ft. leased area. Access road and utility corridor will be constructed. Ground Elevation: 317.7 meters Support Structure: 59.4 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 60.7 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 378.4 meters above mean sea level If you have any questions or comments regarding this notice, please contact the FCC using the electronic mail farm located on the FCC's website at: http://wireless.fcc.gov/outreach/notification/contact-fcc.html. You may also call the FCC Support Center at (877) 480-3201 (TTY 717-338-2824). Hours are from 8 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday (except Federal holidays). To provide quality service and ensure security, all telephone calls are recorded. Thank you, Federal Communications Commission 7 mmw4fm MEAD & HUNT ARCHITECTURE INC Alin TERESA A. SCHULLER 400 TRACY WAY SUITE 200 CHARLESTON, WV 25311 The Roanoke Times Roanoke, Virginia Affidavit of Publication Account Number 6039077 [Date 771 August 01, 2015 Date Category Description Ad Size Total Cost 08/07/2015 legal Notices PUBLIC NOTICE CONSTRUCTION OF TELECOMMUNICATH 1 x 40 L 252.40 Newspaper reference: 0000158216 �-Oto(vt)4(Y�Lj C I-- - Billing Re resentative Sworn to and subscribed before me this Saturday, August 1, 2015 I, i+ rl dd, 7 / e �1� .' Notary ub iC 0.0101 +llf) State of Virginia00 P •• �Y ' City/County of RoanokeI C . �. puOXI � - My Commission expires = F=G 41337gSh 1tJ15S1d� lI f Gip ' / -410 . THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU 'f,,�ftFEA.0\ " Publisher of the PUBLIC NOTICE CONSTRUCTION OF Roanoke Times TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWER I, (tire undersigned) an authorized representative of the Apex Towers is providing notice of itG Intent to construct and o Roanoke Times a daily newspaper published in Roanoke, in the pursuant tel era! COMTu Ic tower pursuant to lc Agr Commission's Federal met[. for Programmatic Aorer. State of Virginia, do certify that the annexed notice PUBLIC T tele COfll lled ollinsA iron tP(VARbHRJL) is The touter . (37 19t NOTICE CONSTRUCTIO was published in said newspaper's on the 5119 Hollins Road' Roanoke. VA 44 9O and 7p 55 32.47.5W) The monopola tower -111 be 299 feet following dates: (Including 4 -root llghtning rod) in height Only comments regarding potent lar effects on Historic Properties should be sent within 30 days Of publication to - Teresa A. Schuller 08101/2015 Mood & Hunt, Inc 400 Tray Way, 5ulte 200 c Charleston, WV 25311 Phone; 681-313-4617 Far: 304/345-6714 T o resa-sc hu I l erOm—eadhunt,cn m (196216) The First insertion being given ... 08/01/2015 Newspaper reference: 0000158216 �-Oto(vt)4(Y�Lj C I-- - Billing Re resentative Sworn to and subscribed before me this Saturday, August 1, 2015 I, i+ rl dd, 7 / e �1� .' Notary ub iC 0.0101 +llf) State of Virginia00 P •• �Y ' City/County of RoanokeI C . �. puOXI � - My Commission expires = F=G 41337gSh 1tJ15S1d� lI f Gip ' / -410 . THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU 'f,,�ftFEA.0\ " NACD Query Results Full Data Report Query input: State = Virginia County = Roanoke NO RECORDS FOUND MATCHING SEARCH CRITERIA IofI ,fhe Delaware Nation -- Cultural Preservation Department 31064 State Highway 281 Anadarko, OK 73005 Phone (405)247-2448 Fax (405) 247-8905 Director ext. 1403 Section 106 ext. 1181 Library ext, 1196 Culture ext. 1180 GIS/GPR ext. 1405 To Whom It May Concern: The Delaware Nation Cultural Preservation Department received correspondence regarding the above project. Our office is committed to protecting sites important to tribal heritage, culture and religion. Furthermore, the tribe is particularly concerned with archaeological sites that may contain human burials or remains, as associated funerary objects. As described in your correspondence and upon research of our database(s) and files we find that the Lenape people occupied this area either prehistorically or historically. However, the location of the project does not endanger cultural or religious sites of interest to the Delaware Nation. Please continue with the project_as planned. However, should this project inadvertently uncover an archaeological site or object(s), we request that you halt all construction and ground disturbance activities and immediately contact the appropriate state agencies, as well as our office (within 24 hours). Please note the Delaware Nation, the Delaware Tribe of Indians, and the Stockbridge Munsee Band of Mohican Indians are the only Federally Recognized Delaware/Lenape entities in the United States and consultation must be made only with designated staff of these three tribes. We appreciate you cooperation in contacting he Delaware Nation Cultural Preservation Office to conduct proper Section 106 consultation. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact our offices at 405/247-2448 ext. 1181 or by email: 'ross delawarenation.conr. Lf za� Jason Ross Section 106 Program Manager The Delaware Nation 31064 State Highway 281 Anadarko, OIC 73005 Mead & Hunt ATTN: Teresa Schuller 400 Tracy Way, Suite 200 Charleston, WV 25311 EASTERN SHAWNEE TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA 12755 S. 705 Road, Wyandotte, SOK 74370 Bluejacket Building (918) 666-2435, Fax: 888-971-3905 RE: Cell Tower Project Hollins Road, Roanoke, Roanoke County, VA TCNS 129587 September 14, 2015 Dear Ms. Schuller, The Cultural Preservation Department of the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma (ESTO) has received the documentation for Mead & Hunt's proposed telecommunications project, Hollins Road, located at UTM Zone 17, 595175 m E, 4131926 m N (WGS84) in/near Roanoke in Roanoke County, VA. ESTO has reviewed the project, TCNS 129587, in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). Based on the information provided and a review of our records, we find that No Historic Properties of sacred and/or cultural significance to the Tribe will be impacted by this project. Therefore, ESTO has no objection to the project proceeding as described; however, please note that any future changes to this project may require additional consultation. In accordance with the NHPA of 1966 (16 U.S.C. § 470-470w-6), federally funded, licensed, or permitted undertakings that are subject to the Section 106 review process must determine effects to significant historic properties, As clarified in Section 101(d)(6)(A-B), historic properties may have religious and/or cultural significance to Indian Tribes. Section 106 of NHPA requires Federal agencies to consider the effects of their actions on all significant historic properties (36 CFR Part 800) as does the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (43 U.S.C. § 4321-4347 and 40 CFR § 1501.7(a). This letter evidences NHPA and NEPA historic properties compliance pertaining to consultation with this Tribe in regard to the proposed project referenced as Hollins Road, TCNS 129587. However, if during construction cultural objects or human remains are inadvertently discovered, please stop work immediately and contact the Cultural Preservation Department of the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma. Thank you for consulting with the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma. i R�Dushane Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Jenniferf§igler Tribal Archaeologist SHAWNEE TRiIBE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEPARTMENT 29 SOUTH HIGHWAY 69A MIAMI, OKLAHOMA 74354 918,16642,6,-2441 PHONE 918,1k542"9916 FAX FACSIMILE OVER PAGE ►►► i i i i i i♦ i►►► ►► ►► i►►► i i i► i►► i i►► i► i i i♦ i i► .► i l i i► i FIRMIAGENCY: �1 Y inP1l4]A.. * 9 11 ts± FAx NUMBER' ��V"1 - 3 " PHONE NUMBER: FRom: KIM JUMPER DATE/TIME: 91 1. t NO, OF PAGES, INCLUDING COVER: MEMO: i oC"1! o t C1.1<<.T1L�i:Z I iii ii iiia i►►►♦iii I&A AL, ►►ii►IS, ii i►►►A i.A►►ii►i►i i►i►i i Message: The Shawnee Tribe's Tribal Historic Preservation Officer concurs that no known historic properties will be negatively impacted by construction of this tower site (see memo line above for TCNS numberls). The Shawnee Tribe's archives do not reveal any issues of concern at this tower location, In the event that archaeological materials are encountered later during construction, use, or maintenance of this tower location, please re -notify us at that time as we would like to resume consultation under such a circumstance. The Shawnee Tribe's Environmental and Natural Resources Department takes this opportuntty to express Its concerns that telecommunication towers can have a potentially destructive impact on bats and migratory birds, particularly those that migrate at night, including species listed as threatened and endangered by both states and the federal government, as well as other species. The Shawnee Tribe suggests that this tower be constructed in accordance with the guidelines available from the US Fish and Wildlife Service to reduce the adverse effects of telecommunications towers on migratory birds; these guidelines may be found at; www.fwa.gov/migratorybirds/issues/towers/Comtow.htmi. The Shawnee Tribe's Environmental and Natural Resources Department is further concerned that the proliferation of cell towers may play a role in honey bee Colony Collapse Disorder. We acknowledge that cell phone technology may not be to blame, especially by itself, as other potential causative factors for the decline have been noted, such as insecticides, tracheal and varroa mites (an immunosuppressant), other parasites, pesticides used on hives to eliminate parasites, genetically modified plants, Nosema fungus, Israeli Acute Paralysis Viris (IAPV) perhaps. introduced from Australia in 2404, Kashmir Bee Virus [K -13M, climate change, and drought. Finally, the Shawnee Tribe's Environmental and Natural Resources Department requests that cell Mower sites, whenever remotely feasible, be restored to native vegetation. In all cases, habitat restoration can protect a variety of species, even in small project areas. The large number of cell tower sites provides an as yet unrealized opportunity for region -wide habitat restoration. The Tribe urges the cell phone industry to provide a model for native habitat restoration for other industries. Please do not hesitate to tali us for additional comment. Catawba Indian Nation Tribal Historic Preservation Office 1536 Tom Steven Road Rock Hill, South Carolina 29730 office 803-328-2427 Fax 803-328-5791 September 9, 2015 Attention: Teresa A. Schuller Mead & Hunt, Inc. 400 Tracy Way, Suite 200 Charleston, WV 25311 Re. THPO # TONS # Project Description 2015-570-10 129587 Ho{lins luau Raw Land Site in Roanoke Co., VA Project No. R4021600455994.0T Dear Ms. Schuller, The Catawba have no immediate concerns with regard to traditional cultural properties, sacred sites or Native American archaeological sites within the boundaries of the proposed project areas. However, the Catawba are to be notified if Native American artifacts and ! or human remains are located during the ground disturbance phase of this prosect. The research and processing fee for each project is $400. For accounting purposes, checks must be made otit to the Catawba Indian Nation THP© (CIN-THPO). If you have questions please contact Caitlin Totherow at 803-328-2427 ext. 226, or e- mail caitlinh@ccpperafts.coni. Sincerely, Wenonah G. Haire Tribal JJistoric Preservation Officer PN: 15-0559 July 29, 2015 PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SURVEY FOR THE PROPOSED HOLLINS ROAD (VAROHR1) WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS TOWER IN ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA By: Justin Zink, M.A. Diana Welling, M.H.P. Brett Carmichael Prepared for: Mead & Hunt, Inc. 400 Tracy Way, Suite 200 Charleston, West Virginia 25311 Prepared by: Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 1441 King Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43212 614-481-8600 (office) 614-481-8610 (fax) 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia Phase I Cultural Resource Management Survey for the Proposed Hollins Road (VAROHR1) Wireless Communications Tower in Roanoke County, Virginia by Justin Zink, M.A. Diana Welling, M.H.P. Brett Carmichael Submitted By: Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 1441 King Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43212 VOICE: (614) 481-8600 FAX: (614) 481-8610 www.lawhon-assoc.com Submitted To: Mead & Hunt, Inc. 400 Tracy Way, Suite 200 Charleston, West Virginia 25311 Lead Agency: Federal Communications Commission �i"0z Justin Zink, M.A. July 29, 2015 Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia 0.1 ABSTRACT In July of 2015 Lawhon & Associates, Inc. (L&A) completed a Phase cultural resource management survey for the proposed Hollins Road (VAROHRI) Wireless Communications Tower in Roanoke County, Virginia. The work was conducted for Mead & Hunt, Inc., as a part of the permitting process for the Federal Communications Commission. The proposed project consists of the construction of a wireless communications tower on the north side of Roanoke in a small industrial area between the suburb of Hollins and the Read Mountain Preserve in Roanoke County, Virginia. The project is located off of Carlos Drive behind (south of) a commercial building between the Norfolk Southern railroad to the east and Hollins Road to the west in a wooded flat. The tower project consists of a lease limits, and a utility easement within an access corridor. The lease limits is 50 feet by 50 feet (15 m by 15 m), encompassing an area of 0.06 acres (0.02 hectares). The proposed tower is a monopole tower that will be 195 feet (59 m) tall. The elevation at the center of the tower lease limits is 1,076 feet (328 m) above mean sea level. The proposed access corridor/utility easement for the tower comes south off of Carlos Drive and bends slightly west to the lease limits south of the existing building. This corridor is approximately 365 feet (111 m) long by 20 feet (6 m) wide. The literature review and Area of Potential Effect (APE) for visual effects are considered a 0.5 mi (0.8 km) radius from the tower location. There are no previously recorded NRHP properties or districts located within the study radius. There are three previously recorded archaeological sites, six architecture resources, and three previous surveys located within the study radius. The fieldwork for the project was conducted on July 22, 2015. The survey involved subsurface testing and visual inspection of the project and failed to recover any artifacts that were 50 years or older. The literature review identified one potentially eligible and two eligible architecture resources within the study radius. Due to the mostly obscured views because of wooded topography and modern intrusions and the defining characteristics that potentially qualify or did qualify the resources for listing in the NRHP themselves, the proposed undertaking will have No (direct or indirect) Adverse Effect on Historic Properties. Therefore, no further cultural resource work is recommended for the project at this time. Lawhon & Associates, Inc. Ili 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road 0.2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 1.0 2.0 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 4.0 4.1 5.0 5.1 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 Roanoke County, Virginia ABSTRACT........................................................................................................ III TABLE OF CONTENTS...................................................................................IV LIST OF FIGURES............................................................................................ V LISTOF TABLES.............................................................................................. V LIST OF PHOTOS............................................................................................. V INTRODUCTION................................................................................................ 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING.......................................................................... 2 RESEARCH DESIGN........................................................................................ 3 Archaeological Field Methods........................................................................ 3 Artifact Analysis Methods................................................................................ 4 CurationMethods.............................................................................................4 PredictiveModel............................................................................................... 4 Project Specific Predictive Model.................................................................. 5 LITERATURE REVIEW..................................................................................... 6 Research Questions 1-2 Discussion.............................................................7 RESULTS OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY (APE FOR DIRECT EFFECTS)........................................................................................................... 8 Research Questions 3-4 Discussion............................................................. 9 RESULTS OF THE HISTORY ARCHITECTURE SURVEY (APE FOR VISUAL EFFECTS)............................................................................................ 9 AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS................................................................. 11 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS................................................................. 12 REFERENCES.................................................................................................. 13 FIGURES........................................................................................................... 14 PHOTOS............................................................................................................ 23 Lawhon & Associates, Inc. iv 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia 0.3 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: County Map with an Overview of Virginia .................................................. 15 Figure 2: Modern Topographic Map............................................................................ 16 Figure3: Project Plans.................................................................................................. 17 Figure 4: V -CBIS Map Showing Previously Recorded Cultural Resources and Surveys............................................................................................................................ 18 Figure 5: 1933 Roanoke, Virginia 15' Series Topographic Map ............................. 19 Figure 6: Fieldwork Schematic with Photo Orientations .......................................... 20 Figure 7: Typical Test Unit Profile and Photograph .................................................. 21 Figure 8: Aerial Map Showing Architecture Resources within the Study Radius 22 0.4 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Soils encountered within the project............................................................. 3 Table 2. Hollins Road Subsurface Testing................................................................. S 0.5 LIST OF PHOTOS Photo 1: View from the center of the lease limits facing north ................................ 24 Photo 2: View from the center of the lease limits, facing east ................................ 24 Photo 3: View from the center of the lease limits, facing south .............................. 25 Photo 4: View from the center of the lease limits, facing west ............................... 25 Photo 5: View of the landform containing the lease limits and of a portion of the utility easement/access corridor.................................................................................. 26 Photo 6: View of the conditions encountered within the shovel tested aspect of the utility easement/access corridor............................................................................ 26 Photo 7: View of the visually disturbed northern terminus of the utility easement/access corridor............................................................................................. 27 Photo 8: Another view of the visually disturbed northern terminus of the utility easement/access corridor from Carlos Drive............................................................ 27 Lawhon & Associates, Inc. v 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia 1.0 INTRODUCTION Under contract with Mead & Hunt, Inc., Lawhon & Associates, Inc. has completed a Phase I cultural resource management survey for the proposed Hollins Road (VAROHRI) Wireless Communications Tower in Roanoke County, Virginia (Figure 1). The work was conducted for Mead & Hunt, Inc., as a part of the permitting process for the Federal Communications Commission. The investigations for this project were conducted in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended in 1992, U.S.C. 470f. The standards and guidelines for the survey efforts are presented in the Archaeology and Historic Preservation: Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines (1985). The document is congruent with the standards established by the Advisory Council of Historic Preservation and the new Section 106 (36 CFR Part 800) regulations that went into effect on January 11, 2001. The federal standards and guidelines are supplemented by the procedures presented by the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (Virginia Department of Historic Resources 2011 a and 2011 b). The proposed project consists of the construction of a wireless communications tower on the north side of Roanoke in a small industrial area between the suburb of Hollins and the Read Mountain Preserve in Roanoke County, Virginia. The project is located off of Carlos Drive behind (south of) a commercial building between the Norfolk Southern railroad to the east and Hollins Road to the west in a wooded flat (Figures 2-3). The tower project consists of a lease limits, and a utility easement within an access corridor. The lease limits is 50 feet by 50 feet (15 m by 15 m), encompassing an area of 0.06 acres (0.02 hectares). An additional 25 foot buffer area was examined on all sides of the lease limits. The proposed tower is a monopole tower that will be 195 feet (59 m) tall. The elevation at the center of the tower lease limits is 1,076 feet (328 m) above mean sea level. The proposed access corridor/utility easement for the tower comes south off of Carlos Drive and bends slightly west to the lease limits south of the existing building. This corridor is approximately 365 feet (111 m) long by 20 feet (6 m) wide. The footprint of all proposed construction disturbance was subjected to survey. Justin Zink completed the literature review for the project on July 20, 2015. The fieldwork was completed on July 22, 2015 by Brett Carmichael (field technician) and Justin Zink, who also served as the Principal Investigator. Brett Carmichael has over 7 years' experience performing archaeological and history/architecture surveys across several states, has a BA in History and English from Cedarville University (2001), and is attending Youngstown State University in pursuit of a M.A. in History focusing on Historic Architecture within the Historic Preservation sequence. Justin Zink has over 12 years' experience performing archaeological and history/architecture surveys across several states, has a BA in Anthropology from Ohio University (2003), a MA in Anthropology from The Ohio State University (2009), and has authored/coauthored over 450 Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 1 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia CRM publications in Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, New Jersey, and Indiana. A total of three hours were spent on site for the fieldwork and photographic documentation. The project was both staked and flagged at the time of survey. 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The environmental setting is presented to contextualize the cultural investigations within the natural environment. Since much of prehistoric activity was based either directly or indirectly on the surrounding environment, its presentation here contributes to the understanding of the types of prehistoric behaviors that may have been exhibited by the inhabitants of a particular prehistoric site. Historic sites were also subject to both environmental and geographical conditions which affected the function of a site, its social status, and/or its productivity (amongst other factors). Understanding the environmental setting is a key element in understanding a variety of archaeological site characteristics. The climate in Roanoke County is considered continental, having relatively cold winters and hot summers. The annual precipitation in the county is approximately 40 inches, with January being the driest month August being the wettest month [U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conversation Service (USDA, SCS) 1997]. Roanoke County is located in the Valley and Ridge physiographic province (Bailey 1999a). The city of Roanoke and the project area specifically are within the Great Valley sub -province. Mason Creek, Tinker Creek, Carvin Creek, and Back Creek, Bottom Creek and their tributaries are the principal drainages in the county, which are part of the Roanoke Rivershed; the northern part of the county is drained by the James River watershed via Catawba Creek. Both these rivers drain to the Chesapeake Bay. The project is drained by an unnamed tributary of Tinker Creek. The geological bedrock of Roanoke County, north of the city of Roanoke including the project, consists of carbonate rocks. The bedrocks in the majority of the county are part of the Cambrian, Ordovician- Silurian, and Devonian - Mississippian systems. The sedimentary rocks found in the county are dolomite, limestone, sandstone, quartz sandstone, shale, and shale with minor gypsum and coal (Bailey 1999b). There are two specific soils encountered within the project (Table 1) [United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA, NRCS) 2015]. Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 2 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Rollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia Tnhlo I Cnilc cnrntintprarl within thA nrnlP_Ct_ Soil Soil Name - - - Slope Landform Symbol Percentage 49B Turn Ang loam 2-7 Fans — footslo e 49C Tumbling loam 7-15 t=ans — footslo e 3.0 RESEARCH DESIGN This research design presents a framework within which the Phase I survey was conducted. The purpose of the Phase I survey is to identify any cultural resources that will be affected by the proposed project. The cultural resources potentially affected include both archaeological deposits and architectural resources 50 years or older. Once the cultural resources are identified, this information will be used to evaluate each archaeological site/historic resource for characteristics of integrity and significance, which are important factors in determining the NRHP eligibility of each site/resource. Integrity is evaluated according to aspects of integrity: location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. Aspects of integrity are discussed elsewhere (Little et al. 2000) and are not repeated here. Significant information and sufficient site integrity to yield further significant information must both be present to make a site eligible for the NRHP. If sufficient data cannot be obtained during the Phase I survey to determine whether the site is eligible or not, then further, more intensive work may be recommended to answer any remaining questions. The Phase I survey is designed to answer the following set of questions in regards to the project: • Has the project been subjected to previous CRM investigation and are there any previously recorded sites/resources located within or immediately adjacent the project? • What is the likelihood of identifying previously unrecorded cultural resources within the project? • Will the proposed project affect any cultural resources (archaeological or above ground structures)? • If cultural resources will be affected, are any of those affected resources listed, eligible, or potentially eligible for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places? 3.1 Archaeological Field Methods Two methods of investigation were utilized during this Phase I survey: visual inspection and shovel test unit excavation. Visual Inspection The entire surveyed area was visually inspected to identify readily apparent archaeological resources, such as mounds, earthworks, and building or structural remnants. The visual inspection also was used to document areas of obvious disturbance, steep slope, and to document any inundated areas (i.e. wetlands, streams, ponds, etc.). The visual inspection transects were spaced maximally at 5 meter intervals across the surveyed area. Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 3 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia Shovel Test Unit Excavation In areas with less than 15 degrees of slope and poor ground surface visibility (less than 50%), systematic shovel test unit excavation took place. Shovel test units (STU) were excavated at 49.2 ft (15 m) intervals in transects spaced 49.2 ft (15 m) apart. Each unit measured 19.7 inches (50 cm) square in size. The walls and floor of each unit were troweled clean to determine the depth of the plow zone and if in situ cultural remains were present. All soil from each STU was screened through 0.25 inch (0.64 cm) hardware cloth by soil horizon to aid in the recovery of any cultural material present. Notes were then taken on the soil color, texture, depth, and the presence or absence of artifacts. If artifacts or features were encountered, a field site number was assigned. Shovel tests units were excavated deep enough to sample all soils that could potentially contain cultural materials. Per the Virginia Department of Historic Resources guidelines (Virginia Department of Historic Resources 2011), shovel test units were excavated "to sterile subsoil' and then an extra 10 cm into the sterile subsoil to verify the lack of cultural remains. Field notes recorded additional information such as field conditions, methods of investigation, STUs, sites, etc. Similar notes will be taken for any site encountered, recording location, size, methods of investigation, etc. The location of any site recovered will be documented using a GPS receiver. Photographs of the project area were taken as deemed appropriate. A record of the photographs was kept in a photo -log and keyed to project mapping. 3.2 Artifact Analysis Methods There was no prehistoric or historic cultural material recovered for this project. Hence, there were no laboratory methods followed and none are presented here. 3.3 Curation Methods There were no cultural resources identified during the survey. The field notes and other materials affiliated with the project will be stored at Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 3.4 Predictive Model A predictive model developed for cultural resource surveys is an excellent tool that can help guide fieldwork efforts based on prior research. The predictive model can help to understand the probability of recovering archaeological deposits within a project, as well as allowing the researcher inter -site comparisons to other sites within the region. While predictive models can become quite complex, the level of complexity should be relative to the type of project. The current undertaking consists of a communications tower with a lease limits and utility easement/access corridor. These constructions have a relatively limited construction footprint and small area of potential ground Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 4 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia disturbance. Due to the small, simple nature of the project, a straightforward predictive model for both historic and prehistoric deposits was generated. During prehistory, land use was generally tied to key characteristics of the environmental setting and local terrain. These characteristics included, but were not limited to proximity to reliable resources (flora and fauna), landform elevation, distance to water, environmental diversity, closeness to trails and other unique settings. Unique environmental settings included rock shelters, caves, waterfalls, swamps, rises on floodplains, and traversable mountainous terrain. Locales with several key characteristics lent themselves to longer term occupations and larger habitations. Upland settings that were further removed from waterways were utilized more logistically (i.e. seasonal hunting, resource procurement, etc.) and witnessed a more mobile subsistence strategy. During the span of prehistory, land use and subsistence changed relative to resource availability and procurement strategies. Population density increased and the introduction of horticulture/agriculture increased the need for a more territorial strategy. Regionalism increased and larger populations settled in village settings tied to crop production and a larger, fertile floodplains, especially during the Woodland era. During the historic era, occupations continued the reliance on key environmental characteristics for settlement locations started during the prehistoric period. Early settlers concentrated on stream valleys, the confluence of rivers, and along trail/supply routes. These occupations were often positioned in the same areas utilized by Native Americans. The time period and occupation of the residents affected the duration and density of settlement. Settler farmsteads were positioned close to springs and near mills. As the historic period progressed, occupations moved to the upland interior and residences were positioned along roadways. Residences were often situated on the elevation within view of the closest thoroughfare for a better presentation of the property. Parcel and lot boundaries predicated the location of the residence as well. Beyond residential settlement, historic period deposits can be affiliated with Civil War battlefields and forts. Certain environmental settings were specifically selected for battle sites, while others were areas where opposing forces incidentally came into contact and engaged each other. Skirmishes occurred and are somewhat more poorly recorded than larger battles. Many of these locations have been documented on maps and written histories. Beginning in the 19th century and continuing through the modern era, residences and various other constructions are mapped on atlases and recorded in legal deeds. 3.5 Project Specific Predictive Model The project consists of a small cell tower lease limits and utility easement/access corridor. The project is located in a relatively non-descript upland foot slope setting removed from the floodplain along Tinker Creek and just beyond the steep side slope of Read Mountain to the east. The project is northeast of the city of Roanoke and southeast of the community of Hollins. The Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 5 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia project is surrounded by large commercial/industrial concerns and the remaining single family residences that have yet to be removed for development. The surrounding setting is relatively wooded as well. There are no residences older than 50 years indicated within the parcel containing the cell tower. Access to the site is from Carlos Drive which terminates nearby into Hollins Road. Large, modern residential developments are located to the south and west of the project area. The terrain is relatively flat and the conditions include immature forestation with dense undergrowth. The project is east of Tinker Creek by nearly 0.32 miles. Disturbance from an active railroad corridor is located immediately to the east of the project as well. There are no distinct topographic settings that would indicate an increased likelihood of prehistoric or historic occupation within the project. The environmental setting and landform suggest a low probability of recovering substantial cultural materials. Historic atlases do not indicate the former presence of any buildings or structures within or adjacent the project area. There are no Civil War activities recorded in the general vicinity of the project either. 4.0 LITERATURE REVIEW The FCC has previously defined the literature review study area for tower projects based on the overall height of the construction. The study area and the Area Potential Effects (APE) for visual effects are the same and set as a 0.5 miles (0.8 kilometer) radius from the tower center point. The Nationwide Programmatic Agreement (NPA) defines the APE for visual effects as "112 of a mile from the tower site is the proposed tower is 200 feet or less in height" (NPA with the FCC regarding Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act [Section VI, C., 4., b]). The following sources were examined through the Virginia Department of Historic Resources on the Virginia -Cultural Resource Information System (V-CRIS) website, and various online resources: 1) USGS 7.5' and 15' series topographic maps associated with the project; 2) DHR Archaeological Site Inventory forms; 3) DHR Architectural Site and Structures Inventory forms; 4) National Register of Historic Places (NRNP) files; 5) DHR Library of Cultural Resource reports; 6) Civil War Maps 7) Roanoke County atlases and histories Upon review of the USGS 7.5' series topographic maps through the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, there are no previously recorded archaeological sites located in the project, but three identified at the edge of the study radius. 44RN0003 is a large open site identified by an amateur collector via surface collection. The only temporal affiliation for the site comes from the identification of Archaic Era projectile points but the site form broadly dates the site from 15,000 BC — AD 1606. 44RN0311 is known also as the Hinman Site Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 6 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia and given two date ranges, 3,000-1,201 BC and AD 1000-1606 based on radiometric dates. It is an open air camp, at which Louis Berger & Associates completed a data recovery salvage excavation in 1998. The site contained lithic artifacts, ceramic artifacts, pit features, hearth features, a set of features indicating a structure, and a burial. 44RN0312 is the remains of a barn, its foundation and some associated refuse dating from AD 1875-1899. The V-CRIS Architecture Resource files did not indicate any previously recorded resources within the project, but identified six within the study radius: 080-0015, 080-0034, 080-0393, 080-0394, 080-0406, 080-0417. Three of the architecture resources (080-0393, 080-0394, 080-0406) were not determined eligible or potentially eligible for the NRHP. Two of the resources (080-0015, 080-0417) were considered eligible by DHR and one resource (080-0034) was considered potentially eligible. There are no NRHP properties or districts identified within the project or within the study radius. A review of the Contract Cultural Resource Management reports failed to identify any previous surveys that impacted the proposed project, but identified two previous Phase I surveys within the study radius (RN -021 and RN -048). Also, the Phase III survey for 44RN0311 is just on the edge of the study radius (Rinehart et al. 2000). There were no Civil War related resources (Potential NR areas, Study Areas, Core Areas) identified within the study radius. A number of historic plat maps and topographic maps were inspected to see if any structures formerly existed within or adjacent to the project and who the previous landowners were for the property on which the project is located. The USGS 9933 Roanoke, Virginia 15' series topographic map (Figure 4) does not indicate any structures within or immediately adjacent the project. The USGS 1963 Roanoke, Virginia 7.5' series topographic map (Figure 2) does not indicate any structures within or immediately adjacent the project. 4.1 Research Questions 1-2 Discussion Now that the background research had been conducted for the project, the first two research questions regarding the relationship of previous surveys and previously recorded sites/resources to the proposed project and the likelihood of encountering previously recorded cultural resources within the proposed project can be addressed. The literature review did not indicate that the proposed project had been subjected to prior survey, nor were there any previously documented cultural resources located within the project. Within the study radius however, there had been two surveys, three archaeological sites, and six architecture resources. Based on this information it is considered possible that prehistoric period archaeological sites may be encountered within the project on the landforms better suited to occupation (i.e. relatively higher and well drained areas). Historic period remains are considered unlikely within the project since the historic Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 7 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia atlases failed to indicate any structures or other known historic activities located within or adjacent the proposed project. 5.0 RESULTS OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY (APE FOR DIRECT EFFECTS) The fieldwork for the project was conducted on June 21St of 2015 by Justin Zink and Brett Carmichael. The weather on the day of survey was sunny and seasonable (80° F). The fieldwork involved archaeological survey of the lease limits and a utility easement/access corridor. The lease limits is approximately 50 feet by 50 feet (15 m by 15 m), encompassing an area of 0.06 acres (0,02 hectares). The lease limits is located on an immature wooded lot with dense undergrowth behind a large commercial building (Figure 6; Photos 1-5; Table 2). The southwestern corner of the lease limits was used as the datum for the fieldwork strategy. The lease limits was relatively flat and subsurface tested with a total of five shovel test units. The shovel test units were excavated within Tumbling loam (49B). The topsoil was generally a dark reddish brown (5YR312) loam that ranged in depth from 20-26 cmbs, with the subsoil being a reddish brown (5YR514) loam (Figure 7). Since a total of five shovel test units were excavated throughout the lease limits, the 25 foot buffer area was visually inspected. There were no archaeological deposits identified within the lease limits. The proposed utility easement/access corridor heads southwest from Carlos Drive along the edge of a disturbed railroad corridor then arcs west to the lease limits (Figure 6; Photos 5-8). This corridor is approximately 365 feet (111 m) long by 20 feet (6 m) wide. The northern approximately 30 feet of the corridor along Carlos Drive was located within fill disturbance associated with the adjacent roadway and railroad crossing intersection. This area consisted of approximately 6-8 feet of fill soil, was covered in modern trash and debris (plastic bottles, tires, misc. trash, etc.), and was visually inspected. The remaining majority of the easement was located within the same flat, wooded conditions with dense undergrowth encountered within the lease limits and subsurface tested. The shovel test units (n=5) were relatively intact, which was surprising given the easement's proximity to the large commercial building and railroad corridor. Some mottling was witnessed in the top 10 cm of topsoil; however intact subsoil was identified within the shovel test units. There were no archaeological deposits identified within the utility easement/access corridor. Tahia 9 Nnllinc Road Riffisurface Testing T.U. # Provenience Soils `^ Topsoil Depth Cultural Resources 1 0,0 Tumblin loam 49B 24 cm Negative 2 0, 50E Tumbling loam 4913 20 cm Ne ative 3 Center Tumbling loam 4913 22 cm Negative 4 50N, 0 Tumbling loam 496 24 cm Negative 5 50N, 50E Tumblin loam 49B)_26 cm Negative 6 A.C. 1 Tumbling loam 496 20 cm Negative Lawhon & Associates, Inc. $ 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia 7 A.C. 2 Tumbling loam 4913 23 cm Negative 8 A.C. 3 Tumbling loam 49C 21 cm Negative 9 A.C. 4 Tumbling loam 49C 22 cm Negative 10 A.C. 5 Tumbling loam 49C 20 cm Negative 5.1 Research Questions 3,4 Discussion Now that the fieldwork is complete for the project, the second two research questions can be addressed; those questions regarding whether the proposed project will affect any cultural resources and if so, are those affected resources listed, eligible, or potentially eligible for the NRHP. There were no artifacts 50 years or older identified during the archaeological survey; therefore no eligible or listed NRHP properties will be impacted within the APE for direct effects. 6.0 RESULTS OF THE HISTORY ARCHITECTURE SURVEY (APE FOR VISUAL EFFECTS) Diana Welling and Brett Carmichael evaluated potential impacts to the history/architecture resources within the APE for visual effects on July 27th of 2015. The purpose of the history/architecture survey was to determine if the proposed project will impose visual impacts upon any history/architecture resources within the APE that are listed on, or eligible for, the National Register of Historic Places. According to the V -CBIS online GIS system, within the 0.5 mile study radius for the proposed tower site, there are no National Historic Landmarks, NRHP districts, or NRHP properties. There were six (6) previously identified architecture resources. Three of the architecture resources (080-0393, 080-0394, 080-0406) were not determined eligible or potentially eligible for the NRHP. Two of the resources (080-0015, 080-0417) were considered eligible by DHR and one resource (080-0034) was considered potentially eligible by DHR. Each resource is discussed below (Figure 8; Appendix A). 080-0393 This resource is demolished. The Mountain View School was a one story school house from the Consolidation Era at the beginning of the 20th Century. The building was a one -bay, one-story wood framed building with a side gabled standing metal seam roof and a brick foundation. Since the building has been demolished, there is no impact to the resource by the proposed wireless communications tower. 080-0394 The dwelling at 5249 Lois Lane was inaccessible for the purpose of this report due to its location at the end of a long drive, off the road, near Tinker's Creek. According to its DHR form, the two-story, single -pen dwelling is constructed of logs and dates to c. 1830. Though that places it in the Antebellum Period, there is no discernable architectural style associated with the house. This resource is not evaluated for inclusion status. It is approximately 1,600 feet (485m) from the proposed tower site, but there is a large mound of fill dirt on the parcel between the proposed tower and the low, heavily wooded stream -edge Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 9 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia where the old abandoned house is located. Due to the nature of the resource and visual screening by woods and modern intrusions, the proposed wireless communications tower will not impact any of the characteristics of the resource that would make it potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. 080-0406 The dwelling at 5524 Old Mountain Road was inaccessible for the purpose of this report due to its location out of view of public right of way. According to the DHR form, the parcel includes a ca. 1891 wood -framed single family dwelling and several outbuildings. No architectural style is included on the form and the resource is not evaluated for NRNP inclusion status. It is located approximately 1,252 feet (382m) from the proposed tower site, but the landscape between is completely wooded except for the tall, metal -towered electric easement and the railroad corridor that each pass between the resource and the proposed tower location. Due to the nature of the resource and visual screening by wooded topography and modern intrusions, the proposed wireless communications tower will not impact any of the characteristics of the resource that would make it potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. 080-0015 Though this resource was evaluated and recommended as NRHP eligible, it was demolished in 2006. The property was known as the Andrew Huff House, the Bellegrove Farm, the Stokes Farm, and the Lewis Huff House. It was a ca. 1870 Greek Revival style dwelling located at 5621 Plantation Road. Since the dwelling has been demolished, there is no impact to the resource by the proposed wireless communications tower. 080-0034 Barely clipped by the study radius for this project, is the parcel boundary of 6103 Plantation Road. The 30 -acre parcel is currently known as "Meadowbrook," but historically was known as "Walnut Grove." Built in 1866, DHR staff has evaluated this property as potentially eligible for NRHP inclusion. The dwelling maintains the Flemish bond brick on its exterior that was a hallmark of local bricklayer David Deyerle. The interior is central passage and its form is double pile. Since the dwelling is located outside of public right of way view, back a long driveway, it was inaccessible for photographing or further analyzation. The dwelling itself is approximately 2,864 feet (0.54 mi) from the proposed tower site, but the parcel extends to the edge of the 0.5 mi study radius (Figure 8). The landscape between the resource and the proposed tower location is a mixture of woods and suburban development including office buildings and single family residences. The dwelling is down in the stream valley, with two wooded ridges obscuring its surrounding viewshed, and the general loss of historic setting in the area, this resource will not be detrimentally impacted by the proposed tower. Due to the nature of the resource and visual screening by wooded topography and modern intrusions, the proposed wireless communications tower will not Lawhon & Associates, inc. 10 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia impact any of the characteristics of the resource that would make it potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. 080-0417 Originally owned by William P. Huff and called "Windy Hill," this domestic single dwelling was later owned by Walter Rudd and called "Windmere." DHR Staff have evaluated this property as Eligible for National Register inclusion. The large, suburban, Late Victorian house is located at 5415 Plantation Road but has been unoccupied since the early 1970s. Original construction took place ca. 1880, and the roofline is cross -gabled with three additional gables extruding at right angles, but not symmetrically. This indicates a Late Victorian era house in a Folk Victorian or some transitional Gothic form. Several reviewers have styled this house a Queen Anne on its resource form and its decor might instruct that, however, for this survey the house was inaccessible as it sits far back a private drive at 5415 Plantation Road and photographs and closer physical analysis were unattainable. Again, this resource itself is more than a half -mile from the proposed tower location; approximately 2,775 feet (846 m), but the parcel boundary extends to catch the edge of the 0.5 mi study radius (Figure 8). The landscape between the resource and the proposed tower location is a mixture of woods and suburban development including a huge industrial distribution center and some single family residences. Further obscuring the resources' view of the tower is a 1965 mechanics garage built on the east side of the resources' parking lot, 40 feet (12 m) away. With the obstruction of its surrounding viewshed, and the general loss of historic setting in the area, this resource will not be detrimentally impacted by the proposed tower. Due to the nature of the resource and visual screening by woods and modern intrusions, the proposed wireless communications tower will not impact any of the characteristics of the resource that would make it eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. 7.0 AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS According to the NPA, the Area of Potential Effects (APE) is defined as "the geographic area or areas within which an Undertaking may directly or indirectly cause alterations in the character or use of Historic Properties, if any such properties exist". There are two types of APE that must be taken into consideration during tower surveys, the APE for direct effects and the APE for visual effects. While conducting the archaeological survey, the APE for direct affects was considered. The APE for direct effects is "limited to the area of potential ground disturbance and any property, or any portion thereof that will be physically altered or destroyed by the Undertaking." The survey did not encounter any archaeological deposits older than 50 years, hence a determination of no historic properties within the APE for direct effects is deemed appropriate. The APE for visual effects is "the geographic area in which the Undertaking has the potential to introduce visual elements that diminish or alter Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 11 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Roam Roanoke County, Virginia the setting, including the landscape, where the setting is a character -defining feature of a Historic Property that makes it eligible for listing on the National Register." Within the Y2 mile APE for this proposed site, there were six previously identified historic resources identified during the Literature Review within the APE for visual effects. The potential visual im acts by the proposed project were assessed during the field survey on July 27t of 2015. Of these six, two lacked a determination of eligibility for inclusion to the NRHP (080-0394 and 080-0406), two were destroyed (080-0015 and 080-0393), and two are properties barely clipped by the study radius (080-0034 and 080-0417). Due to the mostly obscured views because of hilly terrain and commercial/industrial contexts between existing resources and the proposed tower, and the defining characteristics that potentially qualify the resources for listing in the NRHP themselves, the proposed undertaking will have No (direct or indirect) Adverse Effect on Historic Properties 8.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Under contract with Mead & Hunt, Inc., Lawhon and Associates, Inc. (L&A) completed a Phase I cultural resource management survey for the Hollins Road (VAROHRI) Wireless Communications Tower in Roanoke County, Virginia in July of 2015. The archaeological survey involved subsurface testing and visual inspection of the project and failed to recover any artifacts that were 50 years or older. The history/architecture survey for the APE for visual effects evaluated six (6) previously identified architecture resources. Due to the mostly obscured views because of wooded topography and the defining characteristics that potentially qualify or did qualify the resources for listing in the NRHP themselves, the proposed undertaking will have No (direct or indirect) Adverse Effect on Historic Properties. Therefore, no further cultural resource work is recommended for the project at this time. Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 12 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia 9.0 REFERENCES Bailey, C. 1999a Physiographic Map of Virginia. College of William and Mary. 1999b Simplified Geologic Map of Virginia. College of William and Mary. Little, Barbara, Erika Martin Seibert, Jan Townsend, John H. Sprinkle, Jr. and John Knoerl 2000 Guidelines for Evaluating and Registering Archaeological Properties, U.S. Department of the Interior. Rinehart, C.J. and et al. 2000 Ceramic Technology and Community Organization: Archaeological Data Recovery at the Hinman Site (44RN39 9), Roanoke County, Virginia. Louis Berger and Associates, Inc, Richmond. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service 2015 Web Soil Survey. Online Resource <http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/> United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 1997 Soil Survey of Roanoke County and the Cities of Roanoke and Salem, Virginia. USDA Soil Conservation Service in cooperation with the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Virginia Department of Historic Resources 2011 a Guidelines for Conducting Historic Resources Survey in Virginia. Richmond, Virginia. 2011 b Guidelines for the Submission and Review of FCC Projects. Richmond, Virginia Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 13 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road 10.0 FIGURES Roanoke County, Virginia Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 14 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 C) C 40 U) ca W< a 0- 0 ly LU wo, IAS )VI pp-pdpgw 9 LL Mon 12 fit :3 (1) 0 0 0 > x 0 o LU 3 — U W CL G ! ; 79 O 0 2 '{ I� 0 7 J r CL Eu IL M LO a o 6 C14 C Y M 75 QP jt.■ L -.w- i ��},'` �.aa*• 1•••••' ... 1. or P • f - i. `yL � i. f++•f Ii ••+oaf• a. 10 tv ad MEW AL .0011, r go peso OF! • t, Allow '. • fr it i + . m•1 V� a ON ix i d tc N ` adr� Lf) rMIA L e Q Z3 U Ns d o m :'- d� •�- 2 d IiS. IV i � � � "� � W Edo � �. � —• Y i5 �e Li ' f g k los' ;N aiarl�5+n1 r - �' qvW!>cHniou oa�� C W',( n y yy FF2 pw�(ryy p � � �W2y G zI❑yam ~ p JJ -b pkly $hF yq=z 0 2L¢2� ��Siz hoz Fn��Vi�WSrrj�4�i����.I�� OFIN G�a rl'u03 2 Up Fu a¢o V a an Nz5aG7Wgg m_�u��z$ FHd F yyyyyy������ ppiiD wxca u].ii WEY No 21 : I QY r N '�• , �� IT 0 lVi , pip I ^ F 1 eye Y. ai G rn U� U A Q � tvv�JJ rA fir, asp A a PC E A a°viU .4113 013 LIO Q zQ � m cfl 11 4 rt-' ai •• o z U) z �- w z zo� a � O a w a � C cin o O Or � o o CL v O. q p N += co �¢ CL C ® ❑ � I a t� PA l J CA Q A Z w �C�lp4'7 pUjeCC 00 dq� �1 � zz$6 tx 3� J w L", c� z 9 to 7th ,- IVA) ; N • �1 / o xw IL \ wO1Lq \ a m04 LLI w - VG fi Il , to Ix� o E E w � LU Ck l J z ► I / w a \ �j 0-- Ear—ai'99 �G �T �� Cl: Ear a �x<t�R�1N� - - Car Q`—ES7-� EST �h�. ��,���co � EAT 4Y3 E6i HIQl11A 3078blNyN V 4 609 �AV011 SNR70M r' a IL a ao m w ti 0 v -T -- � m cfl 11 4 LO o z U) z �- w z zo� a �7w m M U (D a w .Q 0Ul w C cin U O D j 47 O Or � o CL 0 O. q p N += CL 7th ,- IVA) ; N • �1 / o xw IL \ wO1Lq \ a m04 LLI w - VG fi Il , to Ix� o E E w � LU Ck l J z ► I / w a \ �j 0-- Ear—ai'99 �G �T �� Cl: Ear a �x<t�R�1N� - - Car Q`—ES7-� EST �h�. ��,���co � EAT 4Y3 E6i HIQl11A 3078blNyN V 4 609 �AV011 SNR70M r' a IL a ao m w ti 0 v -T -- \ �\� 2 � .2 \§? � � e % § e \ k f = � 2 ƒ 0 Lo 2 2 §\ = Q & 1 � ƒ E .20 00 / §0[> o . a>n 0 o�� � , � . . ■. . a P ¢ A pr i . 6..- � � -.k � +. y`�"T CF 1. - - r -'it'. • 1 �. •� P 'r q r :� ^ 1r' .• � . • L 1/�� �, =t .f „+ . q gip!® rV �i 3N JD vs ' IP •�„ .,. � � �' �:.. �. •yam �¢J. I f' p l�• � Fh'iu�,�s,wPN , y IJ• JI - �, 1. ..Y .' 1 a a kl— t• �r * i i F u ve Pa PUIf! t 1 o A., iorjlz DefN.R •' ba4�.1BN e�`0 Ir ' J � rJ!� P18,M1 { _ 'S yl �• } � J. !" �~ ,� fir- T'y��4'�s� O��r� �•� ^F� � _ 1��, Y 3�#',�1i'� 4 t,y� k � � . �� i 15-0559 Hollins Road 11.0 PHOTOS Roanoke County, Virginia Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 23 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 i J, 44 hL 41 51 1 • Il., �.dr -'F, '"� y. M I'• .. �1 it "1 .IL WSJ i �; _ y Iwo I IL � • N fix• . >>G��'', � t.. � �> r fa > 7 . Awl 5 •. .i iii ��rf ,E r y !�s}' " WAV' ZIA "'hoto 7: View of the visually disturbed northern terminus of the utility easementlaccess corridor. 4 ! r i 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia APPENDIX A: Architecture Resource Forms from V-CRIS Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 28 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 08 0-00 15 Architectural Survey Foran Other DHR ID: No Data Prprty Infor�natlon Property Names Property Evaluation Status Name Explanation Name Alleged Andrew Huff House DHR Staff: Fligible Historic Bellegrove Farm Current The Stokes Farm Historic/Current Lewis Huff House Property Addresses Alternate - Route 601 Alternate - Stokes Dr. Current - 5621 Plantation Road County/Independent City(s): Roanoke (County) Incorporated Town(s): No Dam Zip Code(s): 24019 Magisterial District(* No Dow Tax Parcel(s): 38.0813130 USGS Quad(s): ROANOKE Acdrtitinaltroprty Informs#Ioill Architecture Setting: Suburban Acreage, 22.1 Site Description: 1958 survey: Located one mile north of Roanoke on Route 601, about one mile from the site of the famous Tombstone Cemetery. 1967 survey: Located on west side of Tinker Creek, 0.2 mile east of Route 601 (Plantation Road), 0.7 mile north of Roanoke city limits. 1990 survey: Property its marked by mature boxwoods and mature hickory trees. Immediate surroundings are rural, but tract housing on all sides threaten the property's integrity. 1991 survey: Just to the east of Tinker Creek, the Huff house is situated at the bottom of a long slope to tite east of Plantation Road. The majority of the 30 -acre parcel is in front of the house which its completely unobstructed from Plantation Road. This open view is important to appreciate the proportion and symmetry of the design and the relative scale of the house. Given its size, fineness of architectural detail, and prominent owner, the Huff house was from its construction a significant 19th -century plantation. Much of the original planting surrounding the house remains including a double row of boxwoods up to the front door, clusters of hardwood and pine trees, and a semi -circular drive. 2006: The house and outbuildings were recently demolished and grounds bulldozed by a developer. 1990 survey: Property'ssite plan indicates original kitchen and slave quarters('?) east of the house, as well as baris and 20th century outbuildings (8 total buildings on site). An old school originally on the property (1893 survey) is now located on the 6101 Plantation Road property to the north, and is failing down. 1991: The three contributing structures include a smokehouse, kitclienlquar•ters, and a work -shed. The kitchen is a small gable roofed structure to the rear of the house. Surveyor Assessment: 1958: The Old Huff Place was originally owned by Andrew Huff and is currently owned by S.D. Stokes, and was built circa 1850- 1855. The place was raided by Hunter's Raiders during the Civil War. 1990 survey: The current owner (S.D. Stokes) provided the following information: (Mr. Stokes was a tax assessor in Roanoke and did research) The property was sold to Louis Huff in 1855. An 1892 or 1893 survey indicated a school on the property. The 5 -bay side (east) is said to have been the main facade accoring to the owner. He says evidence of the walkway and a previous road exist. According to the 1958 HABS form, this house was raided by Hunters Raiders during the Civil War. The farm is surrounded by tract housing and is slated for development. 1991 survey: The Lewis Huff House, located at 5621 Plantalion Road, on Tinker Creek north of the city of Roanoke, in Roanoke County, is eligible for listing in the l�lational Register of Historic Places under Criterion C. It is a significant example of a local 1- CouselEllplan variant with Greek Revival detailing such as the 616 windows and doorway with transom and sidehglits, it is also distinguished by its unique windown and interior omementation, especially the "egg" pattern molding, brick work, and central stair hall. These details are considered characteristic of the work of local carpenter Gustavus Sedon, who was involved with several significant buildings in the area. They include Speedwell (1877), Pleasant Grove (1853), Belle Aire (1855), and Hollins College (1855-1880). These designs reflect the local building tradition of the I -house with the rear ell extension, variegated brickwork, and distinctive carving. July 27, 2015 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 08 0-00 15 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data 2006: Roanoke County land tax books show that the house and outbuildings were built under the ownership of Lewis Huff in 1870, and were valued at $1500. Physical and circumstantial evidence suggests that David Deyerle, who lived in the area and helped build Hollins College, was responsible for the house's brickwork. The use of a three-tier hierachy of brick bonds was consistent with Deyerle's usual modus operandi. The principal facade was constructed using the fashionable stretcher bond, accomplished with specially made bricks that lapped each other in the two outer wythes of the wall. The secondary fagade received the second highest bond in the hierarchy, 5 -course American with Flemish variant (5 stretcher courses to one Flemish course), while the seldom seen south and rear elevations received 4 -coarse common bond. The bricks are also characteristically oversized and brown in color. Surveyor Recommendation: Legacy Ownership Ownership Category Ownership Entity Private No Data .. ...................... I'r3nary Resource Inforintatatan Resource Category: Domestic Resource Type: Single Dwelling Date of Construction: 1870 Historic Time Period: Reconstruction and Growth (1866 - 1916) Historic Context(s): Domestic, Subsistence/Agriculture Architectural Style: Greek Revival Form: No Data Number of Stories: 2.0 Condition: Demolished Interior Pian: Central Passage, Single Pile Threats to Resource: No Data Architectural Description: Architecture Summary, 1958: Greek Revival farm dwelling, two stories, brick, with typical Greek Revival woodwork, Gothic mantels, pediments over exterior fan window, arched egg detail pediment on 2nd floor. Of high value to the community, this building should be preserved. 1967 survey: Brick, 2 stories, hipped roof, mid -19th century. 1990 survey: Greek Revival 1 -house with 2 -room ell; built before 1855, this currently vacant farmhouse sits on 19.71 acres. It is an excellent example of a Greek Revival house. It is very eclectic with unusual, very individualized moldings. The house was remodeled in the 1920s during which time an addition was made to the southeast. The brick on the south end end is 4 -course American bond, the facade is common bond, and the north elevation is 5 -course American bond. "L" configuration: central passage, single pile and original rear ell. Brick foundation with a full basement; hipped standing seam metal roof; 616 windows; 5 original bays on the front and 3 on the side. Porch is I -story, 5 -bay, and there is a side porch that is 1 -story and I -bay; 3 interior end brick chimneys. Egg and dart trim in segmented arches above the 2nd boor windows; pediments over 1st floor windows. Front orientation has changed (possibly); Doric pilaster columns appear to be a later addition, Interior: Greek Revival moldings; open stringer stairs; all original moldings intact in living and dining areas (window trim). These are exotic renditions of Greek Revival, indicating the possible use of a pattern book. Dog car fanciful trim in primary spaces on 1 st floor with an oriental flavor. 2006: The house was recently DEMOLISHED and grounds bulldozed. Exterior Components Component Component 'Type Material Material Treatment Windows Sash, Double -Hung Wood 6!6 Windows Sash, Double -Hung Wood Multiple -light Chimneys interior Brick No Dula Roof Hipped Metal Standing Seam Porch I -story, 5 -bay Wood Columns, Square Structural System and Masonry Brick Other Exterior Treatment Secondary Resource nformal!on July 27, 2015 Page: 2 of 6 Virginia Department of Historic Resources Architectural Survey Form Secondary Resource #1 Resource Category: Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type: Bam Architectural Style: No Do1a Form: No Data Date of Construction: No Data Condition: Demolished Threats to Resource: No Data Architectural Description: 5 barns Number of Stories: No Dam Secondary Resource #2 Resource Category: Domestic Resource Type: Spring/Spring ]louse Architectural Style: No Data Form: No Dalry Date of Construction: 1870 Condition: Demolished Threats to Resource: No Data Architectural Description: No Data Number of Stories: No Darr Secondary Resource #3 Resource Category: Domestic Resource Type: Slave/Servant Quarters Architectural Style: No Dahr Form: No Datu Date of Construction: 1870 Condition: No Dada Threats to Resource: No Data Architectural Description: No Data Number of Stories: No Data Secondary Resource #4 Resource Category: Domestic Resource Type: Kitchen Architectural Style: No Data Form: No Doiu Date of Construction: 1870 Condition: Demolished Threats to Resource: No Nola Architectural Description: No Dalit Number of Stories: No Oula Secondary Resource #5 Resource Category: Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type: Barn DHR ID: 080-0015 Other DHR ID: No Data July 21, 2015 Page: 3 of 6 Virginia Department of Historic Resources Architectural Survey l:onn Architectural Style: No Data Form: No Data Date of Construction: No Data Condition: No Dula Threats to Resource: No Data Architectural Description: No Data No Data No Data Number of Stories: No Data Secondary Resource #6 Resource Category: Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type: Burn Architectural Style: No Data Form: No Data Date of Construction: No Data Condition: No Data Threats to Resource: No Data Architectural Description: No Data Number of Stories: No Data Secondary Resource #7 Resource Category: Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type: Barn Architectural Style: No Dato Form: No Data Date of Construction: No Data Condition: No Data Threats to Resource: No Data Architectural Description: No Data Number of Stories: No Data Secondary Resource #S Resource Category: Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type: Barn Architectural Style: No Data Form: No Data Date of Construction: No Data Condition: No Data Threats to Resource: No Data Architectural Description: No Dala Number of Stories: No Data DHR ID: 080-0015 Other DHR ID: No Data July 27, 2015 Pagc: 4 of 6 Virginia Department of Historic Resources Architectural Survey Form Event Type: Survey:Windshield Project Review File Number: No Drrha Investigator: Pulice, Michael OrganizationlCompany: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Data Survey Date: 5/23/2006 Dlir Library Report Number: No Data Project Staff/Notes; No Data Event Type: Destroyed Project Review File Number; No Data Investigator: No Data Organization/Company: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Data Survey Date: 5/1/2006 Dhr Library Report Number: No Data Project Staff/Notes: No Data Event Type: Survey:Phase II/Intensive Project Review File Number: No Dahr tnvestigator: Pulice, Michael Organization/Company: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Data Survey Date: 11/19/2002 Din• Library Report Number: No Data Project Staff/Notes: No Data Event Type: DHR Staff: Eligible DHR ID: 080-0015 Staff Name: DHR Event Date: 11/19/1991 Staff Comment Roanoke Eastern Bypass Huff House was rated at the local level for significance in the area of architecture. It was found to be eligible with a score of 33. Event Type: Survey:Phase II/Intensive Project Review File Number: 1991-1669-F investigator: Tucker, Lisa M. Organization/Company: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Data Survey Date: 10/21/1991 Dhr Library Report Number: No Darra Project Staff/Notes: No Data Event Type: Survey:Pliase II/Intensive Project Review File Number: No Data Investigator: Tucker, Lisa M. July 27, 2015 DHR ID: 080-0015 Other DHR ID: No Data Virginia Department of Historic Resources Architectural Survey Form Organization/Company: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Dater Survey Date: 1/25/1990 Dhr Library Report Number: No Data Project Staff/Notes: Frazier Associates Event Type: Survey:Phase I/ Reconnaissance Project Review File Number: IVa Data Investigator: No Dara Organization/Company: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Data Survey Date: 10/1/1967 Dhr Library Report Number: No Dara Project Staff/Notes: Fall of 1967 - update of HABSI form Event Type: Survey:HABS Inventory Project Review Nile Number: No Dahr Investigator: Hunt, Jr, Waller S. Organization/Company: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Dahl Survey Date: 6/21/1958 Dhr Library Report Number: No Data Project Staff/Notes: No Data DHR ID: 080-0015 Other DHR ID: No Data July 27, 2015 Pagc: 6 of 6 I T kn M OD ti tj y ° Lo t3 � c l 3 h ti,o 4• _ 4 '� �J�''�' ftry i. D+iG. - • v` p dre,.. .? t,. d U'zS o �' • ;�' ;-yam. ' _ �� .' Ff4r - + �, I 4 _ �a a q v iy cD ZYa 'rte.--.`�a'•�'�r_.�., fit` _ * K. , ,� N C � y� � eu Qj 13 'Its 1-7 CW 4t 49KM P= Aid CO l . t1 . "s:r .• 5 �. ? N :��4�L ice: i �_re�'�•�,f � . � '�i� K � d � � aQ 1� �:_ � + t - .- i ,� im^A R • �� 'fib ^� � o-�pap � � +4. - -.. rf•L�' a ,. ....-=, c .yw . - � -ti � G� °' m Do � '°� .�° 0 N W v D cd cd rqx— LL.,4-u I t— o��" °' a oO t co cc Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 080-0034 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data ,PropQrty I10.01400n Property Names Property Evaluation Status Name Explanation Name Historic Christian Nininger House OIIR Staff: Potentially Eligible Historic Walnut Grove Current Meadowbrook Property Addresses ROANOKE Current - 6103 Plantation Road Route 116 County/Independent City(s): Roanoke (County) Incorporated Town(s): Hollins Zip Code(&): 24019 Magisterial District(s): No Dalti Tax Parcel(s): 027.20-01-27.00-0000 USGS Quad(s): ROANOKE Adltion�l Pr�periy Infttrmatiou Architecture Setting: Rural Acreage: 30.3 Site Description: 2008: The house stands on a private drive off of Plantation Road. Surveyor Assessment: 2008: The date of construction is documented in the 1969 land tax book for Roanoke County, which notes "improvements" made in 1866, valued at $2000. In 1867 the value of building(s) increased to $2800. Surveyor Recommendation: Recommended Eligible Ownership Ownership Category Ownership Entity Private No Dom Virginia Department of Historic Resources Architectural Survey Fenn DHR 1D: 080-0034 Other DHR 1D: No Data Roof Hipped Asphalt Shingle Windows Sash, Double -Hung Wood 616 Windows Sash, Double -Hung Wood Multiple -light Porch I -story, 3 -bay Wood Columns, Square Chimneys Interior Brick Not Visible Structural System and Masonry Brick Other Exterior Treatment Exterior Treatment Roof ;Secondalry Resource ...... mahon Secondary Resource #1 Resource Category: Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type: Smokc/Meat House Architectural Style: No discernible style Form: No Dula Date of Construction: 1866 Condition: Good Threats to Resource: None Known Architectural Description: January 2011 Architecture Summary: brick american bond stntcture, I single -leaf paneled door May 2012: Smokehouse located off the southeast corner of main house. Hand -made brick walls laid in 4 -course common bond; pyramidal roof with asphalt shingles. . Resource Type: Number of Stories: 1 Exterior Components Form: Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Brick American/Common Bond Structural System and Masonry Exterior Treatment Roof Pyramidal Asphalt No Data Secondary Resource #2 Resource Category: Domestic Resource Type: Garage Architectural Style: No discernible style Form: No Data Date of Construction: 1998 Condition: Good Threats to Resource: None Known Architectural Description: January 2011 Architecture Summary: frame structure, front gable roof, garage door - paned, 1 single -leaf pane/panel door ---------------------- Number of Stories: 1 Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Structural System and Wood Frame Wood Weatherboard Exterior Treatment Roof Front Gable Unknown No Dena Secondary Resource #3 Resource Category: Resource Type: Architectural Style: Form; Date of Construction: Condition: Threats to Resource: Architectural Description: Agriculture/Subsistence Barn No discernible style No Data 1950 Good None Known July 27, 2015 Page: 2 of 4 Virginia Department of Historic Resources Architectural Survey Form January 2011: Frame barn, 20th century. Number of Stories: 1 Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Structural System and Wood Frame Wood Vertical Board Exterior Treatment $is#or><c District Informaiio><t Historic District Name: No Dala Local Historic District Name: No Data Historic District Significance: No Drury Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number: Alt) Data Investigator, Mike Police Organization/Company: DHR Sponsoring Organization: No Data Survey Date: 5/3/2012 Dhr Library Report Number: No Data Project Staff/Notes: New interior and exterior digital photos of house. Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number: No Data Investigator: Pulice, Michael Organizatiou/Company: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Data Survey Date: 1/14/2011 Dhr Library Report Number: No Data Project Staff/Notes: DHR Western region architectural historian Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number: No Data Investigator: Pulice, Michael Organization/Company: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Data Survey Date: 5/22/2008 Dhr Library Report Number: No Diva Project Staff/Notes: DHR Western region architectural historian Event Type: DHR Staff: Potentially Eligible DHR ID: 080-0034 Other DHR ID: No Data DHR ID: 080-0034 Staff Name: DHR Event Date: 9/7/1993 Staff Comment The Nininger House (Meadowbrook), Roanoke County (DHR ##80-34), was rated at the local level for significance in the area of architecture. It July 27, 2015 Page: 3 of 4 Virginia Department of Historic Resources Architectural Survey Form was found to be conditionally eligible with a score of 30. RRPO should comment on the property's eligibility. Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number: No Dula Investigator: Tucker, Lisa OrganizationlCompany: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Data Survey Date: 10,116/1991 Dhr Library Report Number, No Duca Project Staff/Notes: VDHR - Architectural Survey Form Event Type: Survey: Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number: No Dale Investigator: Bedell, Ann Organization/Company: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Dila Survey Date: 1/1/1970 Dlir Library Report Number: No Dula Project Staff/Notes: VHLC Structural Survey Form - Hollins College. Undated, but likely from early 1970s, Event Type: Survey:HABS Inventory Project Review File Number: Investigator: Organization/Company: Sponsoring Organization: Survey Date: Dhr Library Report Number: Project Staff/Notes: No 1D(a Nu Data Roanoke Historical Society Unknown (DSS) No Data 10/1/1967 No Data Bibliography: No Data Property Notes: No Data Project Bibliographic Information: Pulice, Michael. Discovering the True Legacies of the Deyerle Builders, Roanoke: Historical Society of Western Virginia, 2011. DHR ID: 080-0034 Other DHR ID: No Data July 27, 2015 Page: 4 of 4 ;gid iol .a►ti.. : a e 1, ; y Cpl w , s` � � ' - n � •� � � - � ay w •� � a v y w ice,:•' t . „ �` a 1 _ y LO CD o is a o r� zy � 1 B • ti �E`•r -� � is _'pili" ss,1� � ^ Y .�'�lC � ;v z U 4 V 14 00 14 dl I��•,1 _ - to N 'z COC. yy A v a o a o O''''�►""� ' v t3 t3 eon r'r (( �' kms' • '` t � T' w i"'I a � ° a ^' ts Sir WAX cl. t e r obe MOW 'c ^as"�. � .'e. -- •�. ,00t � ���,� +i"-"'•� . S�ii1' � '��t�,• l�'#.` _ .,tea- iCLR� A'o •� A 2 1411 CO pCS PL4 CO N • Co V 0 LL (4 CA Q Q by v Q y ,W/ E� N cd 0 0 a � a'LL •I 04 Cp H N AU U 0 0 0+ iv CJ T • CAu 0 /000pb : a o Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 080-0393 Architectural Survey Form Other DAR ID: No Data County/Independent City(s): Roanoke (County) Incorporated Town(s): Nn Data Zip Code(s): A4, Duro Magisterial District(s): No Daw Tax Parcei(s): No Data USGS Quad(s): ROANOKE Primary Resource information'; Resource Category: Education Resource Type: School Date of Construction: 19000a historic Time Period: Reconstruction and Growth (1866 - 1916) Historic Contest(s): Domestic Architectural Style: Other Form: No Data Number of Stories: 1.0 Condition: Poor Interior Plan: No Data Threats to Resource: No Dao Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: Woad shingles in the large gable ends. Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Roof Gable Metal Standing Seam Structural System and Frame Wood Other Exterior Treatment Porch 1 -story, 1 -bay Wood Other Chimneys Other Brick No Dwa Foundation Solid/Continuous Brick Aro Data Secondary Resm ource inforation _ Poo 1 gf 2 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 080-0393 Architectural Survey Fonn Other DHR ID: No Data Secondary Resource ##1 Nrt Data Resource Category: No Data Resource Type: No Data Architectural Style: No Data Form: No Data Date of Construction: No Data Condition: No Data Threats to Resource: No Dula Architectural Description: No Data SRM Events Event Type: Survey: Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number: Nrt Data Investigator: Frazier Associates Organization/Company: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: Nrt Data Survey Date: 5/1/1991 Dhr Library Report Number: No Data Project Staff/Notes: No Data July 27, 2015 Page: 2 of 2 © � w 0 4 Y+i p O W fd 1i �U�yy cD a U UA O O O'1% CJ 'dd cd C,d tom] V ' •y U U U 'G Fv 0000'W r` a 0 00 ❑ IJ C] C) O N N dT 0 LL - LO OD r p N L LL b r r a� CD N d r U O ; C atl U C' �i a s a _rn-13u L a U Chi a st ? c u coq � d v = v v � C ° °m tr � o h y w � U s C 'sem. U a a y d C 'l a m c y G� �a y4j CJ v[�Q WIC �I a O Cl 0 m c a b0 y C • � d C O w ir.q p' �. 6p iml cl v O �W�.. a L. U U� U ti w C) C) .. N N dT 0 LL - LO OD r p N L LL b r r a� CD N d r Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 080-0394 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data Prt►per 7Information Property Names Property Evaluation Status Name Explanation Name Function/Location House, 5249 Lois Lane Not Evaluated Property Addresses Current - 5249 Lois Lane CountylIndependent City(s): Roanoke (County) Incorporated Town(s): No Daro Zip Code(s): 24019 Magisterial Distriet(s): No Data Tax Parcel(s): 39.05-1-11 USGS Quad(s): ROANOKE A,dd><ttonal PropewEy Architecture Setting: Suburban Acreage: 1.9 Site Description: 1991: The house is surrounded by woods. The immediate vicinity maintains rural integrity, but neighborhood integrity is last, 2011: The house stands on the east side of Tinker Creek, between the north -south Route 601 to the east, and Plantation Road to the west. 1991: None. 2011: There are stone walls and walkways around the house, which are now buried or obscured by forest growth. Surveyor Assessment: 2011: This is a notable early -mid -19th -century log house that could have been associated with the buff family, which owned much of the immediate surrounding land during the 19th and early 20th centuries. Surveyor Recommendation: Legacy Ownership Ownership Category Ownership Entity Private No Dato July 27, 2015 Page: 1 of 3 Virginia Departtrrent of Historic Resources DHR ID: 080-0394 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data 2011: The house off of Lois Lane, on the east bank of Tinker Creek, is a substantial single -pen, two-story, weatherboarded hewn -log house, measuring 30 by 27 feet. The logs are mostly, if not all oak, and are V -notched at the corners. One of the larger logs measures 17 inches in diameter, but all are relatively large and are neatly hewn, notched and joined. The original, hewn and planed floor joists throughout the house measure about 5 by 6 inches thick and have beaded edges, which suggests a pre -1840 construction date, The cut nails found throughout and the absence of wrought nails together suggest a post -1820s date. The original (probably stone) chinutcys have been removed, but the limestone rubble basement walls re€uam well intact. On the front of the house is a 20th -century one-story porch supported by machine -made -brick piers. Across the back of the house is a one-story shed -roofed addition. The house has been unoccupied for years and is now overgrown with flora. Though the roof structure has been largely rebuilt, several presumably original rafter pairs survive in-place. They are hewn, not sawn, and mortise -and -tenoned and pegged together. Roman numerals appear on some of them. The wide attic floorboards appear to be original and are fastened with cut nails. Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Roof Gable Asphalt Shingle Windows Sash, Double -Hung No Data 616 Porch 1 -story, 3 -bay Wood Other Chimneys Interior Brick No Dertu Foundation Solid/Continuous Stone Rubble, Coursed Structural System and Log Wood Weatherboard Exterior Treatment .. Secondary Resourcenf©anion No Dula Secondary Resource #1 Pulicc, Michael Resource Category: No Data Resource Type: No Dalu Architectural Style: No Daru Form: No Data Date of Construction: No Data Condition: No Dodo Threats to Resource: No Dula Architectural Description: No Data CBM Events Event Type: Survey:Phase II/Intensive Project Review File Number: No Dula Investigator: Pulicc, Michael Organization/Company: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Data Survey Date: 5/2412011 Dhr Library Report Number: No Dani Project Staff/Notes: DHR Western Region architectural historian Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance July 27, 2015 Page: 2 of 3 Virginia Department of Historic Resources Architectural Survey Form DHR ID: 080-0394 Other DHR ID: No Data Project Review File Number: No Dow Investigator: Shareff, Nancy Organization/Company: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Data Survey Date: 5/1/1991 Dhr Library Report Number: No Data Project Staff/Notes: Frazier Associates Bibliography: No Data Properly Notes: No Data Project Bibliographic Information: No Data July 27, 2015 Page: 3 of 3 s 'r. S/7 y p x O p (V N E0 y U � LL L ) o CO O A QCd N w o O of ,tl +-•+ - cUC G�1 LL a3 a� 'CD bA w U7 O LO Cw a0+ " cd Cd �-1 13 1313 ❑ 13 0 �� Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 080-0406 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR 1D: No Data Propel>iy Ifolrmaholn Property Names Resource Category: Property Evaluation Status Name Explanation Name Single Dwelling Function/Location House, 5524 Old Mountain Road Not Evaluated Property Addresses Historic Time Period: Reconstruction and Growth (1966 - 1916) Current - 5524 Old Mountain Road Conntyllndependent City(s): Roanoke (County) Incorporated Town(s): No Dara Zip Code(s): No Dora Magisterial District(s): No Data Tax Parcel(s): Aro Drrtrr USGS Quad(s): ROANOKE Atdih©ina1 Plt�perty,Infot>I>aat><on Architecture Setting: No Data Acreage: Na Data Site Description: No Data Surveyor Assessment: Example of late 19th, early 20th century dwelling with outbuildings. Surveyor Recommendation-, No Data PK�IIia)ly Resource Itaformatlw Resource Category: Domestic Resource Type: Single Dwelling Date of Construction: 1891 Ca Historic Time Period: Reconstruction and Growth (1966 - 1916) Historic Coatext(s): Domestic Architectural Style: No Data Form: No Drrtrr Number of Stories: 2.0 Condition: Good Interior Plan: No Drrtrr Threats to Resource: None Known Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: Pedimented gable roof, rear sunroom oand one-story addition, some double windows, corbeled chimney, single light gable windows. Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Structural System and Frame Wood Other Exterior Treatment Windows Sash, Doublc-Hung Wood 2/2 Roof Gable Metal Shingle Porch 1 -story Wood Other Windows Fixed Wood 1 -light Chimneys Interior Brick Not Visible July 27, 2015 Page: 1 of 3 Virginia Department of Historic Resources Architectural Survey Form Seeondary Resource Infrmafion Secondary Resource ##1 Resource Category: Domestic Resource Type: Garage Architectural Style: No Duda Form: No Data Date of Construction: No Dura Condition: Fair Threats to Resource: None Known Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: Frame structure with vertical wood siding, gable roof, metal, standing seam. Number of Stories: I Secondary Resource ##2 DHR ID: 080-0406 Other DHR ID: No Data Resource Category: Domestic Resource Type: Single Dwelling Architectural Style: No Data Form: No Data Date of Construction: No Dara Condition: Fair Threats to Resource: None Known Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: old house, frame structure with vertical wood boards, roof, gable, metal, standing seam, fixed, 4 -light windows. Number of Stories: 2 Secondary Resource ##3 Resource Category: DSS Legacy Resource Type: Shed Architectural Style: Na Data Form: No Data Date of Construction: No Data Condition: Poor Threats to Resource: Structural Failure Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: A number of frame sheds stili exist on the property Number of Stories: I Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number: No Data Investigator: Frazier Association Organization/Company: Unknown (DSS) July 27, 2015 rage: c o] �3 Virginia Department of Historic Resources Architectural Survey Form Sponsoring Organization: No Dada Survey Date: 5/6/1991 Dhr Library Report Number: Nn Data Project Staff(Notes: No Data B>tbl�ogr�hie Infprmativn Bibliography: No Data Property Notes: No Data Project Bibliographic Information: No Data DHR ID: 080-0406 Other DHR ID: No Data July 27, 2015 Page: 3 of 3 r'.f. y � r77. % •� .vim �K �gig - O C) +, N � O LL w Lfl CO y T N d is O •� O 'M aid a a Lno •}��„ N O T ,� ° S� chi � � cy qq ° V N N vi F9 Q � ai UN c R C ca A. 0 O'y� .it,- 6. i U U� p 0 0� -s� p 4d a nom•= .2 cl w �° Ar A 'U � Ctli b �• b istt: O C) +, N � O LL Lfl CO T N N •� aid Lno N O T ° cy qq ° Q � ai UN c R C O'y� .it,- c u -s� tl a nom•= ,fia �° � Ctli b �• b istt: Q tl R R R .t 540 Di Ub � R tl a c � U r v Q A 5 4O b C m 4-0 m R WU � aL� W'es y H q ••a .: A z �.- O C) +, N � O LL Lfl CO T N O Lno N O T Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 080-0417 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data s)Property )uforin4.fan - Property Names Property Evaluation Status Roanoke (County) Name Explanation Name Zip Code(s): 24019 Historic Rudd House DHR Staff: Eligible 38.12-5-6 Historic Windy Hill Historic/Current Windmere Historic/Location William P. Huff, Sr., House, 5415 Plantation Rd, Property Addresses Current - 5415 Plantation Road County/Independent City(s): Roanoke (County) Incorporated Town(s): No Daw Zip Code(s): 24019 Magisterial District(s): NO Dala Tax Parcei(s): 38.12-5-6 USCS Quad(s): ROANOKE 2011: The house stands well off the east side of Plantation Road. The large lot is shaded by white pine and spruce trees. ------------ ---------------- 1991: There is a pump house located on the southeast edge of the house. 2011: There are no additional historic resources. Surveyor Assessment: Ca. 1970: This dwelling was originally owned by William P. Huff and is currently owned by Walter Rudd. 1991: Owner was not aware of any history of this property. A rare example of a highly decorated Queen Anne style house in Roanoke County. It is threatened by neglect. The interior of this house maintains all of its original components and is threatened by neglect, especially water damage. 2011: Windmere is among the most impressive late -Victorian houses in the Roanoke Valley. Though remarkably unaltered, it stands vacant, in increasingly worsening condition. Surveyor Recommendation: legacy Ownership Ownership Category Ownership Entity Private No Da7a I'rlmaryReso1>ircenformatlori Resource Category: Resource Type: Date of Construction: Historic Time Period: Historic Coutext(s): Architectural Style: Form: Number of Stories: Condition: Domestic Single Dwelling 1880Ca Reconstruction and Growth (1866 - 1916) Archileclure/Landscape, Domestic Victorian, Queen Anne No Dei1a 2.5 Fair July 27, 2015 Page: 1 or 4 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 080-0417 Architectural Survey Foran Other DHA ID: No Data Interior Plan; Irregular Threats to Resource: Deterioration, Neglect Architectural Description: Ca, 1970: Although constructed of brick, it has the wooden "gingerbread" of the Carpenter Gothic style. Steeple gable of Gothic Revival roof; brick foundation partially above ground; 111 windows; 3 brick chirmleys (center and both ends). This house was built in 1882-1885, and is in deteriorated condition. Architecture Summary, 1991; 2 -112 -story brick house, with complex roof of intersecting gables, built 1880-1900. Sawtooth bargeboard, scrolled brackets on porch and two-story bay, windows with hood, wood finials, sawn balustrade, reeded pilasters on bay between the windows, door with arched transom, sidelights; 5 -course American bond. This is an outstanding example of a Queen Anne interior. The mantels are stylized with abstracted Classical forms. All original door hardware exists - all copper. There are transoms with etched glass above the doors. Between the living room and parlor is a pair of pocket doors approximately 12 feet high. 2011: This elaborate brick house has barely been altered inside or out, but has not been occupied for forty years. During that time it has been neglected, but in recent years has been used for auto parts storage. The roof leaks in several locations. A large puddle of standing water was encountered in one second -floor bedroom. Buckets are currently in use throughout the house to catch rain water. The front porch is terriby deteriorated and can no longer be accessed. Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Roof Gable State Shingle Chimneys Interior Brick No Dori Windows Sash, Double -flung Wood III Porch 1 -story Wood tither Structural System and Masonry Brick Bond, American, 5 -course Exterior Treatment Foundation Solid/Continuous Brick NO Dula Structural System and Masonry Brick Bond, Common Exterior Treatment Structural System and Masonry Brick Flemish, Irregular Exterior Treatment Secondary Resource Xnformta#1on Secondary Resource #1 Resource Category: Resource Type: Architectural Style: Form: Date of Construction: Condition: Threats to Resource: Architectural Description: 1991: Secondary Resource #2 Agrieuulture/Subsistence Pump House No Discernable Style No Daly No Dola NIA None Known Resource Category: Funerary Resource Type: Cemetery Architectural Style: No Discernable Style Form: No Dara Date of Construction: No Dara Condition: NIA Threats to Resource: None Known Architectural Description: 1991: Noted on form - not otherwise surveyed and not photographed. Current Use: No Darcy Historic Religious Afiilitation: Unknown July 27, 2015 Page: 2 of 4 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 080-0417 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data Ethnic Affiliation: Unknown Has Marked Graves: False Has Unmarked Graves: False Enclosure Type: No Dutra Number Of Gravestones: No Dino Earliest ]Narked Death Year: No Data Latest Marked Death Year: No Data ................. storc Dii:triet Information Historic District Name: No Data Local Historic District Name: No 1)(4111 Historic District Significance: No Data SRM Events Event Type: Survey:Phase II/Intensive Project Review File Number: No Data Investigator: Pulice, Micbael Organization/Company: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Data Survey Date: 5/24/2011 Dhr Library Report Number: No Data Project Staff/Notes: DHR Western Region architectural historian Event Type: DHR Staff: Eligible DHR ID: 080-0417 Staff Name: DHR Evaluation Committee Event Date: 9/9/1993 Staff Comment Windmere, Roanoke County (DHR 80-417), was rated at the local level for significance in the area of architecture. It was found to be eligible with a score of 31. Event Type: Survey:Phase II/Intensive Project Review File Number: No Data Investigator: Frazier Assoc.- Organization/Company: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Data Survey Date: 10/10/1991 Dhr Library Report Number: No Dura Project Staff/Notes: Nancy Shareff Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number: Investigator: Organization/Company: Sponsoring Organization: No Data Nancy Shareff, Lisa Tucker Unknown (DSS) No Data July 27, 2015 Page: 3 of 4 Virginia Department of Historic Resources Architectural Survey Form Survey Date: 5/10/1991 Dhr Library Report Number: No Dula Project Staff/Nates- Frazier Assoc. - Event Type: DHR ID Number Change DHR ID: 080-0417 Other DHR ID: No Data DIIR ID: 080-0417 Staff Name: DHR Event Date: 1/1/1991 Staff Comment This resource was originally recorded in the city of Roanoke under DHR file number 128-0026. Identification changed to 080-0417, as the property is in Roanoke County. Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number: 128-0026 Investigator: Spencer, Mary Yancey organization/Company: Unknown (BSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Data Survey Date: 1/1/1970 Dhr Library Report Number: No Dura Project StafflNotes: Structural Survey Form - for Hollins College art department (no photographs and no date on tri -fold form (circa late 1960s/early 1970s). Places Near the Mountains. Roanoke: privately published, November 1985. p. 214. July 27, 2015 Page: 4 of 4 Z . C7 C7 N O# N C7 U - LO CO T O Q N C7 C) to 0 Lq cv T V d � v � U A O y vvpp U 114 �41 .4 LSI s••� 0 00 ❑ OO J Z . C7 C7 N O# N C7 U - LO CO T O Q N C7 C) to 0 Lq cv T Appendix E Flood Map Wetland Map Mead & Hunt, Inc. R4021600-155994.01 Lo • ci CL W LL r 4- rq la Eti ID a �` m m `m m r17 ' is Q m io G N is c "C1 ❑ c m m c c i m C td N; Y�q t Stl 2 [G cm la IL W Ell LL J d' 6 Z LLL ❑ _lwwoaa r _ ►. w) w p o v CIT i�l �a N r+l,'e moi �Ir9 a( ym IL row, 4 + i f N� m � J7 -e. oam ,. /o s � Olt 1 - w .Mr ` • , ,�� a • PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT (ESA) REPORT Hollins Road (VAOHRI) Raw Land Site Roanoke, Roanoke County, Virginia Project No.: R4021600-155994.01 September 2015 Prepared for: Aple 'Towa rs Apex Towers, LLC 125 Whitestick Road Beckley, WV 25801 Prepared by. Mead Mead &Hunt, Inc. 400 Tracy Way, Suite 200 Junt Charleston, WV 25311 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2.0 PHYSICAL/ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 2 2.1 Location, Topography, and Current Site Usage 2 2.2 Soils/Geology 2 2.3 Regional Hydrogeology 2 2.4 Water Supply 2 2.5 Flood Potential 2 2.6 Proximity of Designated Wetlands 3 2.7 Radon Potential 3 3.0 HISTORICAL INVESTIGATIONS 3 3.1 Chain -of -title Review 3 3.2 Aerial Photograph Review 3 3.3 Historical Mapping Review 4 3.4 City Directory Review 4 4.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 4 4.1 Site Grounds 4 4.2 Adjacent Properties 4 5.0 FEDERAL & STATE REGULATORY RECORDS 4 6.0 NEPA CONSIDERATIONS 7 6.1 Wilderness Areas, Wildlife Preserves, and Endangered Species 7 6.2 Historic Properties 7 6.3 Native American Religious Sites 7 6.4 Zoning 7 6.5 FCC Towers, FAA Towers, Airports 7 7.0 INTERVIEWS 8 7.1 Interview with Owner 8 7.2 Interviews with Local Government Officials 8 7.3 Interviews with Others 8 8.0 CONCLUSIONS 8 9.0 SCOPE CONDITIONS 8 9.1 Scope of Services 8 9.2 Standard of Care 8 9.3 Additional Scope Limitations, ASTM Deviations and Significant Data Gaps 9 9.4 Reliance 10 9.4.1 Specialized Knowledge or Experience 10 9.4.2 Actual Knowledge of Environmental Liens or AULs 10 9.4.3 Reason for Significantly Lower Purchase Price 10 9.4.4 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information 11 9.4.5 Obvious Indicators of Contamination at the Site 11 10.0 DEVIATIONS 11 11.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES 11 12.0 REFERENCES 11 13.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS 12 Mead & Hunt, Inc. i R4021600-155994.01 9/15/2015 FIGURES Figure 1 TABLES Table 1 Table 2 APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B Appendix c Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Site Location Map Database Search Information Vapor Encroachment Screen Results Impaired Waterways List Aerial Photographs EDR Database Reports Site Photographs iPaC response, VA DCR request, VA DHR request (e -Form 620 notice) Environmental Professional Qualifications Mead & Hunt, Inc. H 84021600-155994.01 9/15/2015 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As authorized by Mr. David McClure of Apex Towers, LLC, Mead & Hunt Inc. prepared a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the proposed construction of telecommunication tower called Hollins Road (VAOHRI) northeast of Roanoke, Roanoke County, Virginia (Figure 1). Information obtained during our investigation indicated the following: The subject property is owned by William H. Mistele - Trustee (plat book 16, page 138 -- tax parcel 039.09-01-07.00-0000). The proposed up -to 199 -foot, including a 4 -foot lightning rod, monopole tower with equipment shelter within the 50 -foot by 50 -foot leased, fenced compound. Approximately 365 feet of new road will be constructed off Carlos Drive. Hazardous substances, as defined by the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), were not identified at the site. However, an active railroad track is to the east and a copying/duplicating/printing operation is housed in a building to the north. • Evidence suggestive of the presence of underground storage tanks (USTs), aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), electric transformers containing PCBs, or chemicals storage at the subject property was not observed at the site. Pole -mounted transformers are located near the building along Carlos Drive. • Potential off-site historical sources for contamination were identified during the search of federal and state regulatory databases. The EDR report identified one AST facility, but no vapor intrusion sites within the ASTM radii. • Review of wetland maps indicated no wetlands on site, or within one mile. • There are no NRHP sites or NRHP districts, but six possible County -eligible sites/areas within the 0.5 -mile APE of this proposed tower. Line -of -sight profiles and aerials were provided to VA DHR in addition to the a -Farm 620. • The archaeological review indicated three archaeology sites and three previous surveys, within the 1 -mile radius. A Phase I Archaeology survey was performed and the negative findings report submitted to SHPO for their concurrence. Mead & Hunt performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E-1527 of Hollins Road (VAOHR1), the property. An active railroad track and active commercial printing operation inside the building are within a hundred feet of the proposed tower location. They do not appear to have caused any surficial Mead & Hunt, Inc. 1 R4021600-155994.01 9/15/2015 impacts. Thus, this assessment revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with this property. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 9.0 of this report. At a minimum, the data will be maintained in our files for future references. 2.0 PHYSICAL/ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 2.1 Location, Topography, and Current Site Usage The proposed tower site is northeast of Roanoke, Roanoke County, Virginia. Approximately 365 feet of gravel road for access will be constructed off Carlos Drive. Based on the GPS, the ground elevation is 1,059 feet above mean sea level. Site coordinates are 37°19'44.9" north latitude and 79°55'32.5" west longitude. The base map for Figure 1 is the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Roanoke, VA 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle map. The subject property is owned by William H. Misteie - Trustee (plat book 16, page 138 — tax parcel 039.09-01-07.00-0000). The proposed up -to 199 -foot, including a 4 -foot lightning rod, monopole tower with equipment shelter within the 50 -foot by 50 -foot leased, fenced compound. Approximately 365 feet of new road will be constructed off Carlos Drive. 2.2 Soils/Geology The Soil Survey of Roanoke County and Cities of Roanoke and Salem, Virginia, compiled on- line in September 2014, was reviewed for soil types. Site soils at the tower site are classified as 49B (Tumbling loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes). The site is located in the Appalachian Plateaus and Valley and Ridge Physiographic Provinces in western Virginia. The bedrock geology is Cr — Rome Formation of the Cambrian Geologic System. The general geology consists of Pumpkin Valley shale where present, dusky -red and green shale, siltstone, dolomite, and limestone. 2.3 Regional Hydrogeology Site runoff from the project area drains into unnamed drainageways to Tinker Creek, a tributary of the Roanoke River. According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) website, concerning water quality of Tinker Creek, the overall status is impaired as listed on the Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 3034 Impaired Waters. Impairments include temperature and pathogens. A printout for the area's watershed is located in Appendix A of this report. 2.4 Water Supply Public water utilities may be available at subject property. 2.5 Flood Potential Based on a review of the Roanoke County FIRM (panel # 51161CO158G dated 28 September 2007), the site is Zone X, located outside the area that would be affected by 100- and 500 -year floods. Mead & Hunt, Inc. 2 84021600-155994.01 9/15/2015 2.6 Proximity of Designated Wetlands Wetlands are defined as "areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions" (33CFR Part 328.3). Under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), an Army Corps of Engineers' permit is required for the deposition of dredged or fill material into "Waters of the United States" of which wetlands are a subset. The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) 7.5 - minute maps produced by the U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for the Roanoke quadrangle were reviewed as part of this assessment. Based upon this review, wetlands were not identified on the subject site, or within a one -mile. 2.7 Radon Potential Radon, specifically Radon -222, is a radioactive noble gas formed from the decay of Radium -226, and can be a source of radiation exposure caused by inhalation of the decay products of the radon gas. Radon and its daughter products are considered radionuclides, which are defined as any nuclide that emits radiation. Because of this, radon is classified as a hazardous substance under §9602 (a) of CERCLA. Indoor radon is normally derived from radium, which is naturally occurring in soil. Also, since radon is one member of a long chain of radioactive species, which originate from uranium, it is possible that radon can be present at sites, which overlie uranium - containing bedrock. Although it is only possible to determine site-specific radon concentrations through the collection and analyses of samples, the following information was available on the statistical regional occurrence of elevated radon concentrations in Roanoke County, Virginia. Based on 1996 data collected within the zip code of the subject property, 37.15 percent of homes in this area registered over 4 pCi/L (picocuries per liter) radon concentration. Four picocuries of radon per liter of air (pCiA) is the Environmental Protection Agency guideline value for an acceptable long- term (50 -year) indoor radon living exposure level. However, according to the report reviewed, properties with elevated levels of radon have been found in all counties in Virginia. If radon is a concern, then the property should be tested. 3.0 HISTORICAL INVESTIGATIONS Although we cannot make a conclusive determination about the past usage of the site, the sources utilized and discussed in the following sections indicate that the site has historically been undeveloped. 3.1 Chain -of -Title Review The Report of Title was not made available for review as a part of this investigation. 3.2 Aerial Photograph Review Terra Server, an on-line provider, had historical aerial photographs (Appendix B) dated 2010, 2012, 2014, and 2015 along with Google Earth aerial dated 1995. EDR provided aerials from Mead & Hunt, Inc. 3 R4021600-155994.01 9/15/2015 1960, 1968, 1972, 1982, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2006, 2009, 2011, and 2012. The tower site was non -forested pasture land from 1960 to 1995. A small grove of trees progressively filled in around the building, which was first noted in 1982. The township building to the north was under construction in 2009. The railroad track was present on all the aerials. The scale and quality of the aerial photographs precluded a review for small tanks and other potential environmental issues. 3.3 Historical Mapping Review Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, or other such mapping, are performed on industrial or commercial areas. These maps (Appendix C) were not available for the subject property. The Roanoke (1891, 1929, 1933, 1963, 1968, 1978, 1984), VA USGS 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle maps (Appendix C), which included coverage of the site area, were reviewed as part of this assessment. The property was denoted as undeveloped, non -forested lands on all of these maps. The railroad track was noted on all the maps. 3.4 City Directory Review This directory (Appendix C) dated 3 September 2015 identified 5119 Hollins Road in 2015, 2010, 2005, and 2000. The business is listed as Intoprint Technologies Incl L&M Office Solutions/ and Virginia Imaging Products, all of whom do copying, duplicating, and general merchandise sales. 4.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 4.1 Site Grounds Mead & Hunt last conducted a physical reconnaissance in November 2014. The property consists of forested land off Carlos Drive. The commercial business was active and no issues were noted from the exterior review. A railroad track was noted to the east. The closest residential dwelling, approximately 740 feet to the northwest, is off Hollins Road. An active railroad track is directly east of the proposed site. Signs of potential contamination, such as discolored or stained area or unusual odors, at the compound area were not observed. Photographs depicting the subject site are included in Appendix D. 4.2 Adjacent Properties The adjacent properties are railroad, commercial building, and forested land. 5.0 FEDERAL & STATE REGULATORY RECORDS Several federal and state databases were reviewed for information regarding potential or actual environmental threats at the site or in the surrounding area. The database research was performed by EDR, and was conducted in general accordance with the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Standard Practice developed by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM E-1527). Federal and state databases searched as part of this assessment are listed in Appendix C, along with an explanatory statement regarding each database. Mead & Hunt, Inc. 4 R4021600-155994.01 9/15/2415 A summary of the information from each database is presented in Table 1. There was one AST facility (Roanoke County Fleet Service Center, listed with the specified -ASTM radii. There are three unmappable sites within the Roanoke area zip code (24019). Further location of these sites in correlation to the subject site was not passible because of the incomplete addresses. EDR also provides a Vapor Encroachment Screen (VES) report as part of the ASTM standard. The report is provided in Appendix D and its results are summarized in Table 2. There were no facilities identified in this VES report. TABLE 1 - REGULATORY DATABASE SEARCH SUMMARY nArneese RADIUS (Miles) TOTAL Sly < 1/4 1/4 - ll2 1/21 NPL 1.0 0 0 0 0 Proposed NPL 1.0 0 U •" 0 0 0 NPL Liens TP 0 NR NR NR DELISTED NPL 1.0 0 4 '_ 0 0 0 CERCLIS 0,5 0 0 0 0 NR Federal Facility 0.5 0 0 ;' 0 0 NR CERC - NFRAP 0.5 0"':.:::_.: 0 0 NR CORRACTS 1.0 0 RCRIS TSDF 0.5 0 0,, 0 0 NR RCRA LQG 0.25 0 ............."........ . 0 NR NR RCRA SQG 0.25 0 00 NR NR RCRA-CESQG 0.25 0 00 NR NR US ENG CONTROLS 0.5 00..... _> 0 0 NR US INST CONTROLS 015 0 0 0 0 NR LUCIS 0.5 0 0 0 q NR ERNS TP 0 NR NR NR SHWs 1.0 0 ............. . 0 0 0 SWF/LF 0.5 0. 0 0 NR LUST 0.5 0 ....... 0 : 0 0 NR INDIAN LUST 0.5 0 4 L 0 0 NR UST 0.25 0 0 " 0 NR NR AST 0.25 10 I NR NR INDIAN UST 0.25 0 0 0 NR NR FEMA UST 0.25 0 0 0 NR NR INST CONTROL 0.5 0 0 :,' 0 0 NR INDIAN VCP 0.5 0 0 ". 0 0 NR VCP 0.5 0 0 !. 0 0 NR BROWNSFIELD TP 0 0 NR NR NR US BROWNSFIELD 0.5 0 0 0 0 NR ODI 0.5 0 0 0 0 NR DEBRIS REGION 9 0.5 0 ... 0 0 NR Indian ODI 0.5 0 0 0 0 NR US CBL TP 0 .... NR NR NR US HIST CDL TP 4 0 NR NR NR CDL TP 0 .0 NR NR NR LIENS 2 TP 0 0 NR NR NR HMIRS TP 0 0._ NR NR NR SPILLS TP 0 0 NR NR NR RCRA Nongen/NLR 0.25 0 0 ' 0 NR NR DOT OPS TP 0 0 NR NR NR DOD 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 FUDS 1.0 0 0 '' 0 0 0 CONSENT LO 0 0 0 0 ROD 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 Mead & Hunt, Inc. 5 R4021600-155994.01 9/15/2015 UMTRA 0.5 0 0 0 0 NR US MINES 0.25 0 0 0 NR NR TRIS TP 0 0 NR NR NR TSCA TP 0 0 NR NR NR FITS TP 0 0 NR NR NR HIST FTTS TP 0 0 NR NR NR SSTS TP 0 0..:: " NR NR NR ICIS TP 0 0 `:.... ` NR NR NR PARS TP 0 0 NR NR NR MLTS TP 0 0 NR NR NR RADINFO TP 0 0 :' NR NR NR FINDS TP 0 Q ', NR NR NR RAATS TP 0 D NR NR NR RMP TP 0 D NR NR NR UIC TP 0 0 NR NR NR DRYCLEANERS 0.25 0 Q 0 NR NR NPDES TP 0 Q NR NR NR AIRS TP 0 or 0 NR NR INDIAN RESERV 1.0 0 D .,: 0 0 0 SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0.5 0 D 0 0 NR Financial Assurance TP 0 0. NR NR NR PCB TRANSFORMER TP 0 0 NR NR NR COAL ASH EPA 0.5 0 0 ' 0 0 NR LEAD SMELTERS TP 0 U.... NR NR NR COAL ASH DOE TP 0 Q.' NR NR NR EPA WATCH LIST TP 0 Q... _ _ NR NR NR 2020 COR ACTION 0.25 0 0 NR NR COAL ASH 0.5 0 0 0 D NR US FIN ASSUR TP 0 0NR NR NR PRP TP 00 .:...:.::.:.:. NR NR NR US AIRS TP 0 0, NR NR NR EDR MGP 1.0 0 0 ': 0 0 0 EDR US Hist Auto Stat 0.25 0 0 -' 0 NR NR EDR US Hist. Cleaners 0.25 0 0 0 NR NR RGA LUST TP 00l NR NR NR RGA LF TP 0D....;....., NR NR NR fable L. Vauor Encroatenment Ncreen Kesuns Std. Environmental Records Max. Search Radius, miles Property 'ho -mile 'ho- to '/3- mile Federal NPL 0.333 0 0 0 Federal CERCLIS 0.333 0 0 0 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facility list 0.333 0 0 0 Federal RCRA TSD facility list 0,333 0 0 0 Federal RCRA generators list Property 0 - - Federal institutionaWngineering controls registry 0.333 0 0 0 Federal ERNS list Property 0 - - State & Tribal -- equivalent NPL Not searched - - - State & Tribal — equivalent CERCLIS 0,333 0 0 0 State & Tribal — landfillfsolid waste disposal 0.333 0 0 0 State & Tribal — leaking storage tanks 0.333 0 0 0 State & Tribal — registered storage tanks Property 0 - State & Tribal -- institutional/engincering controls registry Property 0 - - State & Tribal — voluntary cleanup sites 0.333 0 0 0 State & Tribal — Brownfields sites 0.333 0 0 0 Other Standard Environmental Records 0.333 0 0 0 Former manufactured gas plants 0.333 0 0 0 Historical gas stations 0.25 0 0 0 Historical dry cleaners 0.25 0 0 0 Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives Property 0 - - Mead & Hunt, Inc. 6 84021600-155994.01 9/15/2015 6.0 NEPA CONSIDERATIONS The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has recognized eight separate items within the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) that are to be addressed during the completion of a Phase I ESA. Two of these items flood potential and wetlands have been previously discussed in this assessment. The remaining items include designated wilderness areas, designated wildlife preserves, endangered species, historic properties of national significance, Native American religious sites, deforestation and water diversion, and zoning laws. These remaining items are discussed in the following sections. 6.1 Wilderness Areas, Wildlife Preserves, and Endangered Species U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service office was contacted regarding designated wilderness areas, designated wildlife preserves, and endangered species. USFWS's generic guidelines and the iPaC Trust Resources Report, which indicate the possibility of endangered species in the area, were reviewed. Consultation request was also submitted to VA Department of Conservation and Recreation (Appendix E). Their responses will be included in the NEPA checklist. 6.2 Historic Properties Form 620 (Appendix E) was electronically filed on 31 July 2015 with information regarding districts, sites, and buildings, structures or objects that are significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture. Additionally, a consultation request was sent to Roanoke County Historical Society. There are no NRHP Sites or NRHP districts, but six possible county -eligible sites/areas, within a 0.5 -mile APE of the subject property. Line -of -sight profiles and aerials were provided to VA Department of Historic Resources to supplement their review. Their responses will be submitted in the NEPA Checklist. 6.3 Native American Religious Sites The SHPO files were reviewed in July 2015 regarding documented cultural resources or known archaeological, historical or architectural sites, or Native American religious sites identified for the project area in Roanoke County. Three archaeological sites and three previous surveys were noted within the one -mile APE. A Phase I archaeological survey was conducted and the negative findings report was submitted to SHPO for their concurrence. A concurrence letter will be provided in the NEPA Checklist. 6.4 Zoning Roanoke County may have requirements for telecommunications towers. Proper permitting through the planning authority will be done, as needed. 6.5 FAA Towers, FCC Towers, and Airports The EDR NEPA Check report identified one FCC/FAA tower, no airports, and several Appalachian Power Company power lines within a one -mile radius. Mead & Hunt, Inc. 7 R4021500-155994.01 9/15/2015 7.0 INTERVIEWS 7.1 Interview with Owner Site representative was interviewed during the site walks regarding environmental issues at the property. He was unaware of environmental issues at the property. 7.2 Interviews with Local Government Officials Mead & Hunt did not contact local government official based upon the information obtained in this interview and the EDR reports. 7.3 Interviews with Others There were no other interviews. 8.0 CONCLUSIONS Mead & Hunt performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E-1527 of Hollins Road (VAOHR1), the property. An active railroad track and active commercial printing operation inside the building are within a hundred feet of the proposed tower location. They do not appear to have caused any surficial impacts. Thus, this assessment revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with this property. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 9.0 of this report. At a minimum, the data will be maintained in our files for future references. 9.0 SCOPE CONDITIONS 9.1 Scope of Services This Phase I ESA was conducted consistent with the procedures included in ASTM E-1527, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. The purpose of this ESA was to assist the client in developing information to identify RECs in connection with the site as reflected by the scope of this report. This purpose was undertaken through user -provided information, a regulatory database review, historical and physical records review, interviews, including local government inquiries, as applicable, and a visual noninvasive reconnaissance of the site and adjoining properties. Limitations, ASTM deviations, and significant gaps (if identified) are evident from reviewing the applicable scope of services and the report text. 9.2 Standard of Care This ESA was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices of this profession, undertaken in similar studies at the same time and in the same geographical area. We have endeavored to meet this standard of care, but may be limited by conditions encountered during performance, a client -driven scope of work, or inability to review information not received by the report date. When appropriate, these limitations are discussed in the text of the report, and an evaluation of their significance with respect to our findings has been conducted. Mead & Hunt, Inc. 8 R4021600-155994.01 9/15/2015 Phase I ESAs, such as the one performed at this site, are of limited scope, are noninvasive and cannot eliminate the potential that hazardous, toxic, or petroleum substances are present or have been released at the site beyond what is identified by the limited scope of this ESA. In conducting the limited scope of services described herein, certain sources of information and public records were not reviewed. It should be recognized that environmental concerns may be documented in public records that were not reviewed. No ESA can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs in connection with a property. Performance of this practice is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs. No warranties, express or implied, are intended or made. The limitations herein must be considered when the user of this report formulates opinions as to risks associated with the site or otherwise uses the report for any other purpose. These risks may be further evaluated - but not eliminated - through additional research or assessment. We will, upon request, advise you of additional research or assessment options that may be available and associated costs. 9.3 Additional Scope Limitations, ASTM Deviations and Significant Data Gaps A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment is not a comprehensive environmental examination of the property and does not include sampling or analytical testing. In preparation of this report, Mead & Hunt has relied on the accuracy and completeness of information provided to Mead & Hunt by different sources. Mead & Hunt does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of such information or the opinions expressed by any person contacted by Mead & Hunt in connection with this study. With the exception of those items herein, Mead & Hunt does not express any opinion as to whether the property actually contains any hazardous substances, hazardous wastes, petroleum contamination, asbestos, radon, or other environmentally harmful substances or whether conditions at the property are in compliance with environmental law. Furthermore, subsurface environmental impairments can only be detected through extensive sampling and analysis of soil and groundwater. Based upon the agreed -on scope of services, this ESA did not include subsurface or other invasive assessments, business environmental risk evaluations, or other services not particularly identified and discussed herein. Reasonable attempts were made to obtain information within the scope and time constraints set forth by the client; however, in some instances, information requested is not, or was not, received by the issuance date of the report. Consideration of such information is beyond the scope of this assessment. Information obtained for this ESA was received from several sources that we believe to be reliable; nonetheless, the authenticity or reliability of these sources cannot and is not warranted hereunder. This ESA was further limited by the following: • Credentials of the company (Statement of Qualifications) have not been included in this report but are available upon request. • Pertinent documents are referred to in the text of this report, and a separate reference section has not been included. An evaluation of the significance of these limitations and missing information with respect to our Mead & Hunt, Inc. 9 R4021600-155994.01 9/15/2015 findings has been conducted, and where appropriate, significant data gaps are identified and discussed in the text of the report. However, it should be recognized that an evaluation of significant data gaps is based on the information available at the time of report issuance, and an evaluation of information received after the report issuance date may result in an alteration of our conclusions, recommendations, or opinions. We have no obligation to provide information obtained or discovered by us after the issuance date of the report, or to perform any additional services, regardless of whether the information would affect any conclusions, recommendations, or opinions in the report. This disclaimer specifically applies to any information that has not been provided by the client. This report represents our service to you as of the report date and constitutes our final document; its text may not be altered after final issuance. Findings in this report are based upon the site's current utilization, information derived from the most recent reconnaissance and from other activities described herein; such information is subject to change. Certain indicators of the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products may have been latent, inaccessible, unobservable, or not present during the most recent reconnaissance and may subsequently become observable (such as after site renovation or development). Further, these services are not to be construed as legal interpretation or advice. 9.4 Reliance This ESA report is prepared for the exclusive use and reliance of Apex Towers. Use or reliance by any other party is prohibited without the written authorization of Apex Towers and Mead & Hunt. This ESA was conducted in accordance with the authorized proposal between Apex Towers and Mead & Hunt. Continued viability of this report is subject to ASTM E-1527 Sections 4.6 and 4.8. If the ESA will be used by a different user (third party) than the user for whom the ESA was originally prepared, the third party must also satisfy the user's responsibilities in Section 6 of ASTM E- 1527. 9.4.1 Specialized Knowledge or Experience The client was not aware of specialized knowledge or experience that is material to RECs in connection with the site. 9.4.2 Actual Knowledge of Environmental Liens or AULs The client did not have actual knowledge of environmental liens or AULs encumbering the site or in connection with the site. 9.4.3 Reason for Significantly Lower Purchase Price This investigation is being conducted as part of the lease agreement for the proposed tower site. Mead & Hunt, Inc. t0 R4021600-155994.01 9/15/2015 9.4.4 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information The client was not aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information within the local community about the site that is material to RECs in connection with the site. 9.4.5 Obvious Indicators of Contamination at the Site The client was not aware of obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the site. 10.0 DEVIATIONS The history of the property was pieced together from the historical sources reviewed. 11.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES Additional services were not requested as part of this ESA. 12.0 REFERENCES Pertinent and available local, state, and federal government listing and websites for recognized environmental conditions were reviewed for evidence of activities, which may have an adverse impact on the subject property. Information received from Environmental Data Resources, Incorporated, an environmental database -clearing house on various federal and state databases, was reviewed to determine the known or suspected presence of hazardous materials at or near the site. Mead & Hunt, Inc. 11 R4021600-155994.01 9/15/2015 13.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS Mead & Hunt, Inc. prepared this Hollins Road (VA0HR1) raw land report in general accordance with ASTM E-1527, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. This ensures that the information presented in the report meets or exceeds industry and regulatory standards. If you have any questions or comments concerning this report, please contact the individual listed below at (681) 313-4617. I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR312. I have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. I have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. My qualifications and experience are provided in Appendix F. Teresa A. Schuller, LRS 174 Sr. Environmental Project Manager 9115/15 Date - JIA-J-� Signature Mead & Hunt, Inc. t2 R4021600-155994.01 9/15/2015 � � r f . • . � , � � � '• r • Igo rrao y� Gem u X. ' E0 ,�_1 erg• ,.?'•�`h / �� =ca � �' � .��, .► µms( l �N�� Nsz Nu 11 S` nn u•rdcr�is I ., .. r I S. }45RofiC /I clNt � � r�,i�f Air;Tnl•rxl V♦ ij � r r . � r 1 ' � 1.1 �� ,L �'•• ���' I :P ♦.;I 15� •�fUlfJ , •,� �, �f�V_ 'r% rr. r-' 1�, • l 4` �l1 ir1111441ill >'r Ce. /.. i I r l l j . 1 ( ��i . ! A!rw Y.- y�I�II' � � ��:_ .5�h �'S�'f .7 'I � }• ril' i, { �',�j # l' f, � 55 i fr/�GOiI. •ii F 1 ( } 4 ts,�, r �k.� �I 1! � '�� •��r d°1 �r�� t � Rlli , �i,^� r � !li s rr y ` to ! �' �r.^'E"T?a. (.-.. �� Y.1. �f .r `.'. • .:,j��y' 4,a..�,� _ .> L` if; a' ,r, ' � � Mu Isar l I ! I �Jz,, �""--i- -�"' L•• ' � I 7. , hY o 'III 1 f ���,) ; ; ;' :: 1 ' f l i l `fi f•° �'�` .�� ��•r'f?N � i �tt�1 l4J + •f 4" '' �''ir � j /`a' f� � �• � 4°' ,��*\ - i :.�A i d �,'irl• j,"•'� • N•'r 5 `. ,1 frr'/ • 100 f.�� ,I rs� "=ii. � 'i � �r f/�(B Declination Ave `'1" - P �( oil I 1 f C�. f / of f'( rmsINo � auf Golf` {y rr IrY 1113 f � // } r' ' 4� : s ti. • 4: Ilnllili, R<I �' da, L •� P' Hyl , �; � � p { i J( ��� ♦: / o%40 MN 8.61 ° W a"si. t� 1 ii' I'�` ' ,_ _ , • \ (;) . CopYriyht (C) 2008 tMTUP0r 200821315 rrl Map Name: ROANOKE Scale: 1 inch = 2,400 ft. Date Published: 1963 State Name: VA Horizontat Datum: NAD83 Print Date: 07/15/15 Date Photo Revised: 1984 Appendix A Impaired Waterways List Mead & Hunt, Inc. R4021600-155994.01 - --o- - -- - a.gov/tmdl_waters10/attains_waterbody.control?p_list_id=&p_au_id=VAW- &p_cycle-2008&p_state—VA Last updated on 9/1/2015 Watershed Assessment, Tracking & Environmental ResultS n You are here: EPA Home Water WATERS Water ouaiity Assessment and TMDL Information Waterbody Quality Assessment Report Return to home pa4e Features 2008 Waterbody Report for Tinker- About This Database On This Page • Water Quality_ Creek Middle 2 (Integrated Report) Assessment • Assessing Water Quality 4Questions and Answers) Status • Causes of ,'? • Integrated Reporting Impairment Guidance • Probable ` Previous National Water Sources Quality Reports Contributing to [ p� a, EnviroMapper for Water Impairments • TMDLs That — - AskWATERS Apply to This r. `' • EPA WATERS Homepage _ Waterbody r �1'I5 • Exchange Network �11 4 �1 • Assessment Database State: Vir inia Hollinsr • Statewide Statistical Waterbody ID: VAW- +' Surveys L05R TKR01B06„ How's My Waterway Local Location: Tinker Creek '`LdAaty" Search tool mainstem from they . ' . Pollution Categories Carvin Creek mouth Summary Document upstream to the 06 �c�h • 'Nitrogen and Phosphorus confluence of Buffalo - j Pollution Data Access Tool Creek. Click on the Waterbody for an interactive map (NPDAT) State Waterbody Type: River EPA Waterbody Type: Rivers and Streams Water Size: 6.54 Units: miles Watershed Name: U12per Roanoke Waterbody Histor Report Data are also available for these years: 2014 2012 2010 2006 2004 2002 Water Quality Assessment Status for Reporting Year 2008 The overall status of this waterbody is Impaired. on or this table atic Life FishShellfish And Wildlife Protection And Pro a ation Im aired (Fish ConsumptionlJAquatic Life Harvesting I Good Recreation IlRecreation IIm aired Wildlife JjFish, Shellfish And Wildlife Protection And Pro a ation Good Causes of Impairment for Reporting Year 2008 Cause of Cause of Impairment Fbesignated Use I State TMDL Development Im airment 9LUMUR I LEIStatus scherichia Coli {E. pathogens Recreation MDL completed oli erniwature, Water IlTemperature IlAquatic Life Non- ollutant impairment Probable Sources Contributing to Impairment for Reporting Year 2008 TMDLs That Apply to this waterbody No TMDL data have been recorded by EPA for this waterbody. Appendix B Aerial Photographs Mead & Hunt, Inc. R4021600-155994.01 1 Go SI earth leetl 2000 meters $00 Hollins Road 1995 Aerial PPM 'j�•df�• �. � � I I I { per^ ��i i '��1.. , �I ! I I` '� 1' 1 I ■ Ill ��t..!!!--- --- � i vi 4 ° R , ^ �a � .� ,•�' fid• r"� }�' •iti A � Bei. q` 1'�� Lim` xri� `w'R' �o �. ut i.• . 4.. r �•% •��� �. i�;i ;y, � - .q,.• I Sri. � �. v' �.'r +'�I ` !�' � tx � �P'.4"�` �T .. Gil w • ice! V � � e1�•ia/� � _ - i � � ..� f' Yii ��'i� � a J w • ice! V � � e1�•ia/� � _ - i � � ..� f' Yii ��'i� TERRAserver I I.l i i , -10 AERIAL :f.iAuEFc`, Print Hollins Road 2014 Aerial Hollins Road VAROHR1 5119 Hollins Road Roanoke, VA 24019 Inquiry Number: 4399470.21 September 01, 2015 6 Armstrong Road, 41h Floor SiiMton, C onnficticul t164M (CEDR Toll Free: BOO.352 QQSO w•ww.admot com EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR's professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade. When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME, USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive. Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report AS IS. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should the be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. Date EDR Searched Historical Sources: Aerial Photography September 01, 2015 Target Property: 5119 Hollins Road Roanoke, VA 24019 yea). Seale Details Source 1960 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1 "=750' Flight Date: April 11, 1960 EDR 1968 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Date: March 25, 1968 EDR 1972 Aerial Photograph. Scale: I"=500' Flight Date: April 27, 1972 EDR 1982 Aerial Photograph. Scale: I"=1000' Flight Date: April 01, 1982 EDR 1995 Aerial Photograph, Scale: 1"=500' DOQQ - acquisition dates: March 24, 1995 USGSIDOQQ 2000 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"-750' Flight Date: April 01, 2000 EDR 2005 Aerial Photograph. Scale: I"=500' Flight Year: 2005 USDA/NAIP 2006 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500` Flight Year: 2006 USDAINAIP 2009 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1 "=500' Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP 2011 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2011 USDA/NAIP 2012 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP 4399470.21 2 U �f i INQUIRY M 4399470.21 N YEAR: 1995 EOR = 500' `������ w r1 w i • 1%' �. � Com. �' � •1=''�' � r r T, ' 1 .i- 4 i`+' Y', off- 1. fR- . ■f I y-� y A .r !, fir « �• of. �' . �1• 1ANA. Ir n a {.: E ) r- 1 yi ♦I '` {-i i i _ �; +"1� ,. ►. •�1�:�� ie,f rr ,� I � 7'• 1., v 1 � ii� ► ! •� � ,� � � - r11i.� 'i �i � '�"�i'"����I'�` yam.. e � 4� � � � � � �•� � � � -�� �f'' ��`� �� � i Ve it Ir 'r ill FYI% e�►� i 1 , [ fF ► t � i, ! � � per, � i��i7 .fi i . ' E+ (' F `hT `�' •u .� A '`f � y err, �.` 1 • F �� r r +�� -I rr F(f�f,��,`{�. S �[4[r5'``r- y,Lrt�'Lr ff i •.,J TTjiry..f Ile A�#+" Z�, R\ 1 �T �Si'S �' ♦fir - f f /1i a "! -- :. r y r• 1' ! `.;{ lxrr$'` a• �'� . f "'',f`1 !• +rr� r p r E ' 'I - r. • d` {e r 1'.;r, ..� �.i �� I . 'S s _ �.. n .�� T� ,rk 1. i , , iT• C.1S.,t i5 ..f R �,. f , r �T�.. �_ 1. Jr- -16 -1 IL iS r A i' , 4 � R r � � cS• � t �Iy � �4 {f , •.���rrrf it f _ 7 � S.� 1 f ��'Is�`, � I .- .�' ��j IF '( + �� - �r 'SI ! �C *"". ti ;�- ` yam• .C. •} `a ' r ff pt El lr. fs't•- F t E fy .p! r t . � ,,; I ," aXf � ,�^ � t. C i ♦fin � . •�s 'a , et Y t j�''�r �• �( C r:� � ale. - � R' E. A; 'tk. 1 ,� . e i pf fY .f � 'r', `Yf Y•.. to,t, + ��' - F �'t�.' n` ' ,; r r f r ,: ' e. ;;�- i ,`.' fit. • '. r �j► a c r CV. +r k Srr. r `1inF i' j! • 1 r ti^ vi"irf�F I;t+.! rr p ys 1. t ���'1'Si . , �f ,.1 " `ey�,: �;, �', yf�`�'��_'����77''�' r�+r` s f+ 'tt 1E r ti� �, ���'"f t }y,;'i� q i..►.} -1 a � e � �r ' R1 ; S t'�f �. • rY ` f i� T�S'f • rr.rr ���+?' L5'�'� �n �y'�I^�I i�1 �71.° i1�e � kr'r', F � ' � i :Rif ''' . �? •��, �� �',,� � � �� y�� Y,,. � - ,; , � � �, k�►�. 1i� R�,;yLrlj[I�Ct •+ •�` r `r• ri' 1 a Te A3�'. r Vol r i. INQUIRY M 4399470.21 YEAR: 2009 = 500' 4N� CEDR I fir rrj1� �`1 1 1 J3 �l ,'-, - 4 � Ii"[r�•r• } t E Thr q d' �gfor 1 N,!f 'f r' . ry 41 m e` r �'F f., �•,, l A l ��• . ! 1 �� 1 . f l � � ,[� of ��< � � e A 41 i + .}. "1l11� - it ^� r: C„ ' , `1 Z' • i "�` ��, • � _�.. .i �' � ..}- •ter. ti\ '�'TT ��^�'`i_" - i iL vo J I • + 14r r .157 INQUIRY M 4399470.21: = `� f Is YEAR. 2011 I- EDR = 5500, '''EEE ' y ^ _ ■ - ki r •. ..�� :'' 14 lip ,vim" .y .�• li'' _ L , I _ I ; l !,: lei•P��• 9.•M'' , 'r 49 r � ' r� /'•�� �'�'1 ( �f •, �`► , Li t�` i T��Rr i�x`� i'�►�,j���1 it Y.Ar t 1j �� '«^� •r. * I' iy�'�i LST 40 fo It .31 �',�� P.i �• '•4' rr'il'"'r+j'',�,Q1•.11d�, i "L�, r'. ,. �� .11 � +� i{� ,�� .i4 .. .. � ' 7Y 4• ,/i. � � .� � .•+hire ti � t ��� �:� :#r ,�t ` v���%" � � '�' �+r �,• ','� � •�: 1� F �`1 fi'�x >� � .. #,�i . � .w'�� - :alt 1�.(�i�' �� t i. 1 r � • RR �` P WI) T. '' `,TPP•i ,r}ly" "hof*:.4�.1jj'1..r j.. -� ,� -.Am d, '' , - .� ~ IT��� 4�y!!��« 5`ry�11�1�'.4.j�'" i��]'• '�f/`r f%2� r •J� )�y ; r1. . ,� * 'y�� ►�1•_�x tr L'J � �� r �«�rr,��) r,�,� !` ; ` •+�• , r'. >� � 5 j1T l' � ` � yly� .� - 4, -] * r� ��1` ,'�i .1 .� ') k ��t� r • � J. • -1� '� 4 7.. 1' }�� !r' �'r. •- 'i � � `• M � •� � ! i.. ; '{ �„ !: lid+ � -I+ 4, 4 r i' r a ti, •y( � 1 � �'), a � t �': , , �� .L ,.p�. � ,,� � l.,'�, • "t r �.� '',�• � Y � v'�,il �•,• 3' y i-••'�w�1 ,w 1 �' 'ia. ; aR+ 4i >' fM r'.�; )' r ,7 ', "moi` 1. • ',k', t ` `'.Ft, 7�y , t=' � i), � ,� ' Ir ; ,r' "�• J � ta' y 1 'I l 1t, }: ,} 1 r lr��t i � � + �'� 1hj dt INQUIRY #: 4399470.21 ; tib, fi , ;�•. ' i �': j ,1 f ; ` ? N - • . ,,dy : t � r t '� t ► , ��,,?i �' � ' ,r T� '-''fig. YEAR: 2012 , r +� �, w t.•', ; ' j� ; •.. Appendix C EDR Database Information Mead & Hunt, Inc. R4021600-155994.01 Hollins Road VAROHR1 5119 Hollins Road Roanoke, VA 24019 Inquiry Number: 4399470.14 September 01, 2015 6 Arrrmstrong Road 41h Flour (rEDRm Shelton, Conner-liciii n6484 Toll Free: BOO.357 0050 + vvw edrnot (om Certified Sanborn® Map Report 9101115 Site Name: Client Name: Hollins Road VAROHR1 Mead & Hunt 5119 Hollins Road 400 Tracy Way (rEDR` Roanoke, VA 24019 Charleston, WV 25311-0000 EDR Inquiry # 4399470.14 Contact: Teresa Schuller The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Mead & Hunt were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/senborn. The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was qenerated. Certified Sanborn Results: Site Name: Hollins Road VAROHR1 Address: 5119 Hollins Road City, State, Zip: Roanoke, VA 24019 Cross Street: P.O. # NA Project: R4021600-155994.01 Certification # D211-4064-13946 UNMAPPED PROPERTY This report certifies that the complete holdings Library, LLC collection have been searched supplied target property information, and fire covering the target property were not found. SanbomID Library search results Certification # D211-4664-6346 The Sanborn Library includes more than 1,2 million fire Insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track of the Sanborn historical property usage in approximately 12,000 based on client American cities and towns. Collections searched: insurance maps Library of Congress tri University Publications of America V" EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 4866w Limited Permission To Make Copies Mead & Hunt (the cllent) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE, ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER, IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Date Resources, Inc, All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 4399470 - 14 page 2 Hollins Road VAROHR1 5119 Hollins Road Roanoke, VA 24019 Inquiry Number: 4399470.15 September 01, 2015 6 Armstrong Road. 4th Floor CEDR � %hralton, ronnrcli�ul 11R484 Toll Free: 800.352 0050 www edmat COM EDR Historical Topographic Map Report Environmental Data Resources, Inc.s (EDR) Historical Topographic Map Report is designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topographic Map Report includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the early 1900s. Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report AS IS. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should the be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission, EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. Historical Topographic Map II �^ r�l7n:r11•rsi,ltl \`!I i r .� b y "5 P CnR! f Kr"46 Il. a,1'r� nr•lil,ntt". ( ,`ti'�W (•'` T. • .�Iett�:z i � � 'F _ f✓c - j -. o / Wild Car Knob � �� ' FO 6te 1'R f: rY . 001 Ijrsi,�t at,1`19.`ilsl-•r. g,» (•.?. `L y_W, In ` ' GrearlsK b I �� �� ff9, •11 .�l W"��.. s • t �; f . Y r L 'o j1 d 4" l3 J r� fi- 940�mss'?tr.�vr ('` �1 /tr - � ,} '� �.fl. ) °�\ll�,� �S;i•If•Irtslry•li � r /` '° `,i f 1511 1� ili5. 'li• }Yit111 C)1.t11•r•� orer Mines f f0 0fJ� . r=•. 1 111;• I �B S FORT. ti9tu �, f v $Oa V) _ ' � i6 t �s11.'7• �-.r � -`% - S � 10, � LD�S FORO I. " 'M�ti,.a'• Yellow lWl�i \�i1 +B '` . 'cr1 • `.t—, 1l ..3s S. TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Hollins Road CLIENT: Mead & Hunt N NAME: ROANOKE VAROHRI CONTACT: Teresa Schuller MAP YEAR: 1891 ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road INQUIRYM 4399470.15 Roanoke, VA 24019 RESEARCH DATE: 09/01/2015 SERIES: 30 LAT/LONG: 37.3291 1-79.9257 SCALE: 1:125000 Historical Topographic Map fir, 'I Ir.. .i2 ILe. •` 1. i I C . u€9 I. Il�r 7 �i. ter, t✓ p b" I �;a , ' T'tiar. - •l ,Jk.`f L6 � J \ ti .. 111 - TiiF, u�� � 1 i\�ir,�v Illi 1� I +�YY' Yf -r Siewa Rr, 6d LA V � ��95 it i) I'J ' 1 IB gas) �R• �•• '"� '�••� r � 1w•` • 'fie.. i �./., P , i, fA~/ � / � � �E•'/erewt• 'a 1_ ` - �� •. 3� it '}� c ��'�ra. }. � � � � • ' 44 AIA. �'- + � + --r,r},, � In9- Sk' V tluir M 914Fg Ir ! _. _- milmo- 1 N zyy>a v I R„ TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Hollins Road CLIENT: Mead & Hunt N NAME: ROANOKE VAROHRI CONTACT: Teresa Schuller MAP YEAR: 1929 ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road INQUIRY#: 4399470.15 Roanoke, VA 24019 RESEARCH DATE: 09/01/2015 SERIES: 15 LAT/LONG: 37.32911-79.9257 SCALE: 1:62500 Historical Topographic Map . /'.r,' { f f 7 S I{ h r 5i• `' 1 Y� k1sO.....EPA 11"s'., c� 'fib •' \ `� t _ _ _ _ x.- , ii' � t- _- rk y ey]tl e - �• a 092 .F • - _ �S ' SC . G I fyy,..• (. I. ' �5 7 7 315', . ''�H�liihy,•t •'. . � •^'- � 13Al11ii1>� •� t f]�� rj � � A ,r { h' •-,e { I}111 i u.trj - Tusatr - � ..-�� �4 •- - -r �- / -- - ` rj08 4 °'' •c �F>H'- , '1 •F�V' � . � . �// IOU JI • •`�"..t`•`x -`�` Ni]TL'ell ulaet `�• a J� j �` • I I I t J I � P 'lea ,. �.a. :[� �' - .r7 0 0 �rcA, Siewar -�,,�rr•" Round Hill < H7H5 l ► II ` N l J IU 1 a w+ .25., er' fit_• � � J i • 'I e •• �p�t � y ,�_'`�` rf �i, ��•.�'3•,-�t�-��b� ' ,,f l _ r, �o �I � �i f,: r i . , �M'('TWY 1 � �yy�.,l i1—� .�'T �i�-1` , ��{'+' - �`•! .(.pl lF •I'ei '.i: A�F, •�` • 1 • � Ibr��o t"��4n _ � _ � J/1 *. i.� ,{� _ =! � . '� '.. ,.. ��.�1•L6(111 I.� -• � r� -�' '`may � UNdN,� ����� s•' I `�; F���. ��P�. � 7�r�- � � .._ - - . x 1c._. r �.' R+.... .sa'x�.=- d_ NY~•��r`:a � J-+�.rA ,c?�'x'. '�- ,-'�ti"�'k' `ig �C. �.•`' � f ���•-�s_. _ �'\.: '"` � .•+� TARGET (QUAD SITE NAME: Hollins Road CLIENT: Mead & Hunt N NAME: ROANOKE VAROHRI CONTACT: Teresa Schuller MAP YEAR: 1933 ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road INQUIRY#: 4399470.15 Roanoke, VA 24019 RESEARCH DATE: 09/01/2015 SERIES: 15 LAT/LONG: 37.3291 / -79.9257 SCALE: 1:62500 Historical Topographic Map tip, � .! ,✓" � 7 €I } Ilk, *P 44 + •,�• • ` '�, is � . 1•t _ _ 'j '�;1., � \ : . � i� q. r Hollins 11 Am way i ; ..4nrn(ii rrdr .cYl I i` � d �,-,, � � {;erll � - - _.� � Y - �� rf �•�S fl •!.,o.n ph�nun'hlll � � {� 1 f I'I ,,1 � � jlimr�t I{u Vie•. Y i� __ , I 4 f3 r,' L` Ir I.• c . y� ` I f ,I 1� I r 1 I P I Cern !. ` j7 t \ ti 4 j IJ•0 673 ti�• I r i,J�� f 1060 J I Pati} _�_ i r •� �I •',Y 'i. �I`t ,11rtiSun 1' y � • X411 [�}illr,.l usN'�,� j. i �. f•' Y 1 / N ( •� 'y� �r %Y 1 T3BI1 �r�lAr3E 0 '.� iJr v(l 7 f rS` r6 (.ifM t...... II y �� P .11' g �• :1 f Ole Monlerey TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Hollins Road CLIENT: Mead & Hunt N NAME: ROANOKE VAROHR1 CONTACT: Teresa Schuller MAP YEAR: 1963 ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road INQUIRY#: 4399470.15 Roanoke, VA 24019 RESEARCH DATE: 09/01/2015 SERIES: 7.5 LAT/LONG: 37.3291 1-79.9257 SCALE: 1:24000 Historical Topographic Map ' • •f� 3 y Iirrllinti _,,. � 1 j • ; 2° , Ir ,,,' " � , J Y rle. inmbstoneV0 I l 11 • i{ad,"t J f;e m rfr i AL1 4 �i�• � �j� � it Airway i Eraay z A..�• All { r,Y� s � �• �1 J, � I I A1C P ., E- 1 ♦ �. f , E illy ' �� •rl., a�j' nTy � r rrfh rir.v � � �'," � '• •1 • •11•• .. �.. r �� �ru. .,,,, I',,II \`•Ir+ f r}' — f31ue Iliils, . yC tir11 z ! 1 . 'r:^� f ne.� - .•_y ... : G..;� {gulf Club �•� Ei � [, F(r. ,\1 raIJl, AVL T � � �; � r. ilikk, Cr F, ,ll_. ��,;, � � •� � i'I �� 1 C;eell Course .91V munteicy TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Hollins Road CLIENT: Mead & Hunt N NAME: ROANOKE VAROHRI CONTACT: Teresa Schuller I� MAP YEAR: 1968 ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Roast INQUIRY#: 4399470.15 PHOTOREVISED FROM :1963 Roanoke, VA 24019 RESEARCH DATE: 09/01/2015 SERIES: 7.5 LAT/LONG: 37.3291 1-79.9257 SCALE: 1:24000 Historical Topographic Map moi/ 1� Y!� 1037 �� V' • , !! rr "^. - - h ,�y-'7`��q(�U,oy � r' �y". 4� �1 1J i '�.�►.i. j !r 1 rr -44fl lillti �. �:\• / " •V� '� { ' � � +�`' )]1 "4 1 1��I lii� 3 iil. 5 r�. �["(�m -! I ZZT il• � 7r i 4� ff -�/. � +�, 1 !I/f)(+�.,�. }+J1r7 1, �I;' , " ..f .{H I, t. � \ ,III„ I,,p. 'j• � j • �r f � I,?�: S �'" �^ �'�f �� � ' Snl r�l'I "h•IUIL � t � '� I ( � �� �1 � � � 1 �rT e� �' ' /� +4� { 1" / 1 • f'S (rre I — I zI •�� ¢ 1 �� _ i' f� �� I 1 {'•, y 4 M1 ...... �'+ � . �, II• ' ( f � �' {, III _ �'� I h � +IhIIf �IJ���I lf�r�,(�� r �f%"'r �w /]� r������i �'7 f fIv I�•{ I � �n,�I a� i� �.1� �ti 11 ('t '�J/,.i�f � /��jr�f � ��j'( •� I 1 l�, 1I:I ' I ( I. L rI '.1� (1 t;til(r 17 �(` ,/ � •J !� �� ,• 1 . �, ` � •� I I � � . � itI , ,,.I 1 �i l,�({ ( � iE ilk'/ 11111 '1��. r , ) i yy5555 I jj 1 - \ '� � •+¢ I [15i � '1v 9f1" �'��b (— 1 i i r`II _ � � ' 7 r ^5411f1 ,ems h�� •, ' I � ' . 'I • :. , ( �. �I � � � r �, f � I � . � � � j �� f l �1?J7Il �/J/�r r�� w- � �'� �r � - % �`��� �1 v1. 6 � III li � � � 'e_.�'1J �% � r �.. , �'I• ll�ll il'� i �� ��fll�l ��� ��i� �� f 4 'JIB ,' I _ 0 .S'Vs' f I � •r '� J. /. 'I S �p� :j1 + /( 4a r � � j r "^�..,y' \" I °�� � "'yrN 1 hl rfW ryv �tl it I d•` +. � r *. � I � � i 115��,1 tl vr �I ��� •�n. /,'I'. ' r Ilf 1 1' 7.•� II ,��J� II /� ��.�. F'7.'llh7[1M f 7 t t �'� l..r 1, 1 t � I'• + I , '. I It'' . -�I ' ,• r � �K �� 1 I1 � � � ' 4 •i � , � � � L'e I A V£ .I" i 1r• 14 1 � �I + Ph ��CMIIJ[li AVE. Gf1111f Sr• . IL I I �,� / I.� Yi�•1� � I I A' � Ir1A,d•rm lrlEer { I � I���� }��i; f"111 'I I " � I Ili Orlii.. t; �,� i -�I:o I 3 p� .� ISI Oolf Cour se "'e3 bj [wl �.. •,, illlr Moil lefoy TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Hollins Road CLIENT: Mead & Hunt N NAME: ROANOKE VAROHR1 CONTACT: Teresa Schuller MAP YEAR: 1978 ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road INQUIRY#: 4399470.15 PHOTOREVISED FROM :1963 Roanoke, VA 24019 RESEARCH DATE: 09/01/2015 SERIES: 7.5 LAT/LONG: 37.3291 f -79.9257 SCALE: 1:24000 Historical Topographic Map Hm QhO olli Ill •r.. I Noyl hr irir ,h• }• t ! `\s, j1j) t: •s is nlrSlwatE'. , • I 1 y i i', .,! c r1, . � rI . I Y i + ....a. \ Z— `• �h�+kisurt,uus V4111 AiawaY . I I. • s 4 I .1' (3V8 COn i { C 1 r r r s 1 � �� 1�1��1��'i �.+r �l,/"_�,� 4.1 \� K, � I I '�, " �•r t�l �'� ! I �. �IV ! I i � �I' I -irk `r�i ,al �.I�1 . 5��" �\_ .���1• 1 " ' i r I is 4 � lO�.�x r - I /.�.�� r '•�. �1y�1j�� f ll�.. •I li �ti `', � 1� � l 1. . i � Wi I � it s, �� � � rF 1• . I � o \V!7 owo 1• .. f fay 1:44 l�, J. ', .��'-'.. ��`�:'...�y _ ,. �� �\�` �I• i- � "I I _ �l.7tlai ��. a�f �. •.�I. 11 i � 471 �� 4 ?l • ''L / r f�l � � j .�� � ` � �• 1 1 .I� i k 1 / ni" � ..� 1 // # •11 � 1 JJ 1 j �i�,.,s. �s I ` ,.�j r"J .!CJI jjjjJJ//�//!'`�\ '1 1100 x 'y� ` 'y4itilsss, I:ts 4. * I', 1 ISA + v+� �•- _ (1/' f _��C "•,.1',r/� 1 •? Arl i F7 1K1..; A `ll�•ti ( G011� i � r ��, �� �• G^' I, s`sl,rnriJat! �' I � I �l r ai� f 1 � �•, � 1� //{] � \ �� / ;r . r High 5(fl ' �� i� ;'�: • II � �r i ' ;, 1 ( / J ( % f - JYF Fti, � 'i' r � d i ,•��ie � � ,'1 t '~T r I f r/ /` •;1 15 I, f 0�rt TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Hollins Road CLIENT: Mead & Hunt N NAME: ROANOKE VAROHRI CONTACT: Teresa Schuller MAP YEAR: 1984 ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road INQUIRYM 4399470.15 PHOTOREVISED FROM :1963 Roanoke, VA 24019 RESEARCH DATE: 09/01/2015 SERIES: 7.5 LATILONG: 37.32911-79.9257 SCALE: 1:24000 Hollins Road VAROHR1 5119 Hollins Road Roanoke, VA 24019 Inquiry Number: 4399470.10 September 03, 2015 6 Armstrong Road Shelton, CT 06484 800.352.0050 (rEDROEnvironmental Data Resources Inc www.edrnel.com SECTION Executive Summary Findings City Directory Images Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. r►�cr•oio-r�n�� Environmental Data Resources, Inc.'s (EDR) City Directory Abstract is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR's City Directory Abstract includes a search and abstract of available city directory data. For each address, the directory lists the name of the corresponding occupant at five year intervals. RESEARCH SUMMARY The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. An "X" indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report. Year Source TP A&Lnin Text Abstract Source Image 2015 Polk City Directories X X X - 2010 Polk City Directories X X X - 2005 Polk City Directories X X X - 2000 Polk City Directories X X X - 1995 Polk City Directories - X X - 1990 Palk City Directories - X X - 1985 Palk City Directories - X X - 1980 Hill's City Directory - X X - 1975 Hill's City Directory - X X - 1970 Hill's City Directory - X X - 1964 Hill's City Directory - X X - 1940 Hill's City Directory - X X - 4899470-16 Pagel TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 5119 Hollins Road Roanoke, VA 24019 FINDINGS DETAIL Target Property research detail. Hollins Road 5119 Hollins Road Year Uses 2015 Intoprint Technologies Inc copying mach & supl mfrs LBM Office Solutions copying duplicating mach supl Virginia Imaging Products gent merchandise retail Source Polk City Directories Polk City Directories Palk City Directories 2010 Into Print Tech printing equip Polk City Directories LBM Office Solutions copying duplicating Polk City Directories mach supl 2005 A B Dick Cc laminating equip supl Polk City Directories Virginia Imaging Products copying duplicating Polk City Directories mach sups 2000 Not Verified Polk City Directories 4399470-16 Page 2 ADJOINING PROPERTY DETAIL The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report. Detailed findings are provided for each address. Hollins Road Hollins Road Year U Source 2095 No other addresses in range Polk City Directories 2010 No other addresses in range Polk City Directories 2005 No other addresses in range Polk City Directories 2000 No other addresses in range Polk City Directories 1995 No other addresses in range Palk City Directories 1990 No other addresses in range Polk City Directories 1985 No other addresses in range Polk City Directories 1980 No other addresses in range Hill's City Directory 1975 No other addresses in range Hill's City Directory 1970 No other addresses in range Hill's City Directory 1964 No other addresses in range Hill's City Directory 1940 No other addresses in range Hill's City Directory 5022 Hollins Road Year Uses Source 2015 Residential Palk City Directories 2010 Hanover Direct Inc internet & catalog Polk City Directories shopping 5075 Hollins Road YVAr Uses Sou, 2015 Air Compliance Group LLC air pollution Polk City Directories control 2010 Air Compliance Group LLC air pollution Polk City Directories control 5121 Hollins Road Year Uses Source 2010 W & L Construction & Paving Polk City Directories 5235 Hollins Road Year Uses Source 2015 Roanoke County Fleet Svc Polk City Directories 4399470-16 Page 3 5240 Hollins Road Year Uses 2015 Reformation Hearald Publishing Seventh Day Adventist Reform churches 2010 Reformation Hearald Publishing Seventh Day Adventist Reform churches 2005 Reformation Hearald Publishing Seventh Day Adventist Reform churches Source Polk City Directories Palk City Directories Palk City Directories Polk City Directories Polk City Directories Polk City Directories 4399470-16 Page 4 TARGET PROPERTY: ADDRESS NOT IDENTIFIED IN RESEARCH SOURCE The following Target Property addresses were researched for this report, and the addresses were not identified in the research source. ,Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 5119 Hollins Road 1995, 1990, 1985, 1980, 1975, 1970, 1964, 1940 ADJOINING PROPERTY: ADDRESSES NOT IDENTIFIED IN RESEARCH SOURCE The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report, and the addresses were not identified in research source. Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source Hollins Road No Years Found 5022 Hollins Road 2005, 2000, 1995, 1990, 1985, 1980, 1975,1970, 1964, 1940 5075 Hollins Road 2005, 2000, 1995, 1990, 1985, 1980, 1975, 1970, 1964, 1940 5121 Hollins Road 2005, 2000, 1995, 1990, 1985, 1980, 1975, 1970, 1964, 1940 5235 Hollins Road 2010, 2005, 2000, 1995, 1990, 1985, 1980, 1975, 1970, 1964, 1940 5240 Hollins Road 2000, 1995, 1990,1985, 1980, 1975, 1970, 1964, 1940 Hollins Road VARQHR'I 5119 Hollins Road Roanoke, VA 24019 Inquiry Number: 4399470.13s September 01, 2015 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 (rEDW Environmental Data Resources Inc Toil .edr et.com2,0050 www.edrnet.cvm SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 7 Orphan Summary 12 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR -1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-5 Physical Setting Source Map A-14 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-16 Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGRA Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT, Purchaser accepts this Report "AS I3". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property, Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc, or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TC4399470.13s Page 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 5119 HOLLINS ROAD ROANOKE, VA 24019 COORDINATES Latitude (North): Longitude (West): Universal Tranverse Mercator: UTM X (Meters): UTM Y (Meters): Elevation: 37.3291000 - 37° 19'44.76" 79.9257000 - 79° 65'32.52" Zone 17 595177.2 4131718.5 1049 ft, above sea level USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY Target Property Map: 5948970 ROANOKE, VA Version Date: 2013 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT Portions of Photo from: 20120628 Source: USDA TC4399470.13s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I Target Property Address: 5119 HOLLINS ROAD ROANOKE, VA 24019 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP ROANOKE MAPPED SITES SUMMARY RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) 4399470.13s Page 2 TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR`s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: 6]fil_li'1T_1:774►1t11:%]ilklil ►tl_19:� ].awl; Federal NPL site list NPL National Priority List Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing CERCLIS Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERC-NFRAP CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS Corrective Action Report Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRA-CESQG RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS Land Use Control Information System US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List TC4399470.13s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 EXECUTIVE "SUMMARY.. US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls Federal ERNS list ERNS Emergency Response Notification System State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS SHWS This state does not maintain a SHWS list. See the Federal CERCLIS list and Federal NPL list. State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF Solid Waste Management Facilities State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank Tracking Database INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LTANKS Leaking Petroleum Storage Tanks State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing UST Registered Petroleum Storage Tanks INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal institutional control/ engineering control registries ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites Listing INST CONTROL Voluntary Remedlation Program Database State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing VCP Voluntary Remediation Program State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Site Specific Assessments ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands ODI Open Dump Inventory DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register TC4399470.13s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 US CDL__________ Clandestine Drug Labs Local Land Records LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System SPILLS Prep/Spills Database Listing SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen 1 NLR RCRA - Non Generators 1 No Longer Regulated FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites DOD Department of Defense Sites SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems ROD Records Of Decision RMP Risk Management Plans RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System PRP Potentially Responsible Parties PADS PCB Activity Database System ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System FTTS FIFRAI TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System COAL ASH DOE Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database RADINFO Radiation Information Database HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem US MINES Mines Master Index File FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System AIRS Permitted Airs Facility List NPDES Comprehensive Environmental Data System COAL ASH Coal Ash Disposal Sites DRYCLEANERS Drycleaner List ENF Enforcement Actions Data Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing TIER 2 Tier 2 Information Listing UIC Underground Injection Control Wells EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants TC4399470.13s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 EDR US Hist Auto Stat EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations EDR US Hist Cleaners EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS State and tribal registered storage tank lists AST: The Aboveground Storage Tank database contains registered ASTs. The data come from the Department of Environmental Quality's Aboveground Storage Tank Data Notification Information. A review of the AST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 05/01/2015 has revealed that there is 1 AST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction 1 Distance Map ID Page ROANOKE COUNTY FLEET 5235 HOLLINS RD NNW 0 - 118 (0.121 mi.) 1 Facility ID: 2041825 CEDS Facility ID: 200000853074 TC4399470.13s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 3 records, Site Name SINGER FURNITURE CITY RIGHT OF WAY ROAD SYSTEM NW SIGNAL SHOP Database(s) INST CONTROL, VCP, SPILLS LUST, LTANKS LTANKS TC4399470.13s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 OVERVIEW MAP - 4399470.13S SITE NAME: Hollins Road VAROHRI CLIENT: Mead & Hunt ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road CONTACT: Teresa Schuller Roanoke VA 24019 INQUIRY #: 4399470.13s LAPLONG: 37.3291 179.9257 DATE: September 01, 2015 4:36 pm Target Property ° 114 t' 2 1 Miles Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property Indian Reservations BIA + Sites at elevations lower than N County Boundary the target property �F Power transmission lines 1 Manufactured Gas Plants National Priority List Sites yrs p� Pipelines PiPip line flood zone ' Dept. Defense Sites ® 500 -year flood zone ® National Wetland Inventory This report includes Interactive Map Layers to display and/or hide map information. The legend includes only those icons for the default map view. SITE NAME: Hollins Road VAROHRI CLIENT: Mead & Hunt ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road CONTACT: Teresa Schuller Roanoke VA 24019 INQUIRY #: 4399470.13s LAPLONG: 37.3291 179.9257 DATE: September 01, 2015 4:36 pm 91 N NL DETAIL MAP - 439947O.13S a + w • y r. �� �►�• � is n D 1116 11e 114 Mlles Indian Reservations BIA County Boundary Power transmission lines 100 -year flood zone 500 -year flood zone This report includes Interactive Map Layers to display andlor hide map information. The NO includes only those icons for the default map view. SITE NAME: Hollins Road VAROHRI CLIENT: Mead & Hunt ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road CONTACT: Teresa Schuller Roanoke VA 24019 INQUIRY #: 4399470.135 LAT/LONG: 37.3291 179.9257 DATE: September 01, 2015 4:37 prn Target Property • Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property + Sites at elevations lower than the target property A Manufactured Gas Plants C Sensitive Receptors 0 National Priority List Sites FT, -J, Dept. Defense Sites D 1116 11e 114 Mlles Indian Reservations BIA County Boundary Power transmission lines 100 -year flood zone 500 -year flood zone This report includes Interactive Map Layers to display andlor hide map information. The NO includes only those icons for the default map view. SITE NAME: Hollins Road VAROHRI CLIENT: Mead & Hunt ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road CONTACT: Teresa Schuller Roanoke VA 24019 INQUIRY #: 4399470.135 LAT/LONG: 37.3291 179.9257 DATE: September 01, 2015 4:37 prn Search Distance Target Total Database (Miles) Property < 118 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Proposed NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 NPL LIENS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 CERCLIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERC-NFRAP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal RCRA CORRA CTS facilities list CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Federal RCRA non-CORRA CTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 RCRA-SQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 RCRA-CESQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 US ENG CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 US INST CONTROL 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal ERNS list ERNS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS SHWS NIA NIA N/A N/A NIA N/A N/A State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 INDIAN LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 LTANKS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 TC4399470.13s Page 4 Search 0 US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 Local Lists of Landfill/ Solid 0 Waste Disposal Sites Distance Target INDIAN ODI 0.500 ODI 0.500 DEBRIS REGION 9 Total Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-1 > 1 Plotted UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 AST 0.250 1 0 NR NR NR 1 INDIAN UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 State and tribal institutional EPA WATCH LIST TP 2020 COR ACTION 0.250 TSCA TP control / engineering control registries TP 0 NR NR NR 0 0 ENG CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 INST CONTROL 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR INDIAN VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 State and tribal Brownfields sites NR NR NR 0 BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 0 US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 Local Lists of Landfill/ Solid 0 Waste Disposal Sites 0 INDIAN ODI 0.500 ODI 0.500 DEBRIS REGION 9 0.500 Local Lists of Hazardous waste/ Contaminated Sites 0 US HIST CDL TP US CDL TP Local Land Records NR LIENS 2 TP Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS TP SPILLS TP SPILLS 90 TP Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR 0.250 FUDS 1.000 DOD 1.000 SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0.500 US FIN ASSUR TP EPA WATCH LIST TP 2020 COR ACTION 0.250 TSCA TP TRIS TP 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 TC4399470.13s Page 5 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 EDR US Hist Auto Stat 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 EDR US Hist Cleaners 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RCA LF TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 RGA LUST TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 - Totals -- 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database NIA = This State does not maintain a SHWS list. See the Federal CERCLIS list. TC4399470.13s Page 6 Search Distance Target Total Database (Miles) Property < 118 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-1 > 1 Plotted SSTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 ROD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 RMP TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 RAATS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 PRP TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 PADS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 ICIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 FTTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 MLTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 COAs. ASH DOE TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 COAs. ASH EPA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 PGB TRANSFORMER TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 RADINFO TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 HIST FITS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 DOT OPS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 INDIAN RESERV 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 UMTRA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 LEAD SMELTERS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 US AIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 US MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 FINDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 AIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 NPDES TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 COAL ASH 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 DRYCLEANERS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 ENF TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 Financial Assurance TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TIER 2 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 UIC TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 EDR US Hist Auto Stat 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 EDR US Hist Cleaners 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RCA LF TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 RGA LUST TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 - Totals -- 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database NIA = This State does not maintain a SHWS list. See the Federal CERCLIS list. TC4399470.13s Page 6 Map ID MAPF NDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number 1 ROANOKE COUNTY FLEET SERVICE CENTER AST A100360166 NNW 5235 HOLLINS RD NIA < 118 ROANOKE, VA 24019 0.121 mi. 640 ft. Relative: AST: Higher Facility ID: 2041625 Facility Type: LOCAL Actual: CEDS Facility ID: 200000853074 1057 ft. Tank Info: Owner: Owner Id: Owner Name: Owner Address: Owner Address2: Owner City/State/Zip: UST Status: AST Status: Fed Regulated: Tank Number: Tank Type: Tank Capacity: Tank Contents: Tank Status: Tank Containment: Install Date: Containment: Curbing Containment: Weirs Containment: Sorbent Containment: Culvert Containment: Diversion Containment: Retention Containment: Dike Containment: Unknown Containment: Other Containment: Other Note Release Detection: Release Detection: Ground Water Release Detection: Visual Release Detection: Vapor Release Detection: Interstitial Release Detection: None Release Detection: Other Release Detection: Other Note Release Prevention: Double Bottom Release Prevention: Double Walled Release Prevention: Lined Interior Release Prevention: Poly Jacket Release Prevention: Exc Liner Release Prevention: None Release Prevention: Unknown Release Prevention: Other Release Prevention: Other Note 28580 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 1216 Kessler Mill Rd PO Box 29800, Roanoke, VA 24018 Salem, VA 24153 NIA Reg No AST -1 AST 1000 USED OIL CURR IN USE 08 -SEP -2009 No No No No No No No No No Not reported No Yes No No No No Not reported No Yes No No No No No No Not reported TC4399470.13s Page 7 ROANOKE COUNTY FLEET SERVICE CENTER (Continued) A100350166 Tank Foundation: Steel No Tank Foundation: Earthen No Tank Foundation: Concrete Imp Yes Tank Foundation: Unknown No Tank Foundation: Other No Tank Foundation: Other Note Not reported Tank Roof: Float No Tank Roof: Cone No Tank Roof: Breather No Tank Roof: Dbldeck No Tank Roof: Pontoon No Tank Roof: Balloon No Tank Roof: Lifter No Tank Roof: Pan No Tank Roof: Other Yes Tank Roof: Other Note nla - Horizontal Tank Material: No Tank Materials: Bare Steel Yes Tank Materials: Cath Protect Steel No Tank Materials: Fiberglass No Tank Materials: Concrete No Tank Materials: Composite No Tank Materials: Insulated Tank Jacket No Tank Materials: Lined Interior No Tank Materials: Excav Liner No Tank Materials: Epoxy Coated Interior No Tank Materials: Epoxy Coated Exterior No Tank Materials: Double Walled Yes Tank Materials: Double Bottomed Yes Tank Materials: Unknown No Tank Materials: Other No Tank Materials: Other Note Not reported Owner: No Owner Id: 28580 Owner Name: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Owner Address 1216 Kessler Mill Rd Owner Address2: PO Box 29800, Roanoke, VA 24098 Owner City/State/Zip: Salem, VA 24153 UST Status: NIA AST Status: Reg Fed Regulated: No Tank Number: AST -2 Tank Type: AST Tank Capacity: 1000 Tank Contents: LUBE OIL Tank Status: CURR IN USE Tank Containment: Install Date: 08 -SEP -2009 Containment: Curbing No Containment: Weirs No Containment: Sorbent No TC4399470.13s Page 8 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number ROANOKE COUNTY FLEET SERVICE CENTER (Continued) A100350166 Containment: Culvert No Containment: Diversion No Containment: Retention No Containment: Dike No Containment: Unknown No Containment: Other No Containment: Other Note Not reported Release Detection: No Release Detection: Ground Water No Release Detection: Visual Yes Release Detection: Vapor No Release Detection: Interstitial No Release Detection: None No Release Detection: Other No Release Detection: Other Note Not reported Release Prevention: Double Bottom No Release Prevention: Double Walled Yes Release Prevention: Lined Interior No Release Prevention: Poly Jacket No Release Prevention: Exe Liner No Release Prevention: None No Release Prevention: Unknown No Release Prevention: Other No Release Prevention: Other Note Not reported Tank Foundation: Steel No Tank Foundation: Earthen No Tank Foundation: Concrete Imp Yes Tank Foundation: Unknown No Tank Foundation: Other No Tank Foundation: Other Note Not reported Tank Roof: Float No Tank Roof: Cone No Tank Roof: Breather No Tank Roof: Dbldeck No Tank Roof: Pontoon No Tank Roof: Balloon No Tank Roof: Lifter No Tank Roof: Pan No Tank Roof: Other Yes Tank Roof: Other Note nla - Horizontal Tank Material: Tank Materials: Bare Steel Yes Tank Materials: Cath Protect Steel No Tank Materials: Fiberglass No Tank Materials: Concrete No Tank Materials: Composite No Tank Materials: Insulated Tank Jacket No Tank Materials: Lined Interior No Tank Materials: Excav Liner No Tank Materials: Epoxy Coated Interior No Tank Materials: Epoxy Coated Exterior No Tank Materials: Double Walled Yes Tank Materials: Double Bottomed Yes Tank Materials: Unknown No TC4399470.13s Page 9 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site ROANOKE COUNTY FLEET SERVICE CENTER (Continued) Tank Materials: Other Tank Materials: Other Note Owner: Owner Id: Owner Name: Owner Address: Owner Address2: Owner City/State/Zip UST Status: AST Status: Fed Regulated: Tank Number: Tank Type: Tank Capacity: Tank Contents: Tank Status: Tank Containment: Install Date: Containment: Curbing Containment: Weirs Containment: Sorbent Containment: Culvert Containment: Diversion Containment: Retention Containment: Dike Containment: Unknown Containment: Other Containment: Other Note Release Detection: Release Detection: Ground Water Release Detection: Visual Release Detection: Vapor Release Detection: Interstitial Release Detection: None Release Detection: Other Release Detection: Other Note Release Prevention: Double Bottom Release Prevention: Double Walled Release Prevention: Lined Interior Release Prevention: Poly Jacket Release Prevention: Exc Liner Release Prevention: None Release Prevention: Unknown Release Prevention: Other Release Prevention: Other Note Tank Foundation: Steel Tank Foundation: Earthen Tank Foundation: Concrete Imp Tank Foundation: Unknown Tank Foundation: Other Tank f=oundation: Other Note No Not reported 28580 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 1216 Kessler Mill Rd PO Box 29800, Roanoke, VA 24018 Salem, VA 24153 NIA Reg No AST -3 AST 1000 USED OIL CURR IN USE 08 -AUG -2011 No No No No No No No No No Not reported No No No No No No Not reported No No No No No No No No Not reported No No Yes No No Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number A100350166 TC4399470.13s Page 10 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number ROANOKE COUNTY FLEET SERVICE CENTER (Continued) A100350166 Tank Roof: Float No Tank Roaf: Cone No Tank Roof: Breather No Tank Roof: Dbldeck No Tank Roof: Pontoon No Tank Roof: Balloon No Tank Roof: Liner No Tank Roof: Pan No Tank Roof: Other No Tank Roof: Other Note Not reported Tank Material: Tank Materials: Bare Steel Yes Tank Materials: Cath Protect Steel No Tank Materials: Fiberglass No Tank Materials: Concrete No Tank Materials: Composite No Tank Materials: Insulated Tank Jacket No Tank Materials: Lined Interior No Tank Materials: Excav Liner No Tank Materials: Epoxy Coated Interior No Tank Materials: Epoxy Coated Exterior No Tank Materials: Double Walled Yes Tank Materials: Double Bottomed Yes Tank Materials: Unknown No Tank Materials: Other No Tank Materials: Other Note Not reported TC4399470.13s Page 11 § CL A \ CF) \ To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR Is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund), The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 75 NPL Site Boundaries Source: EPA Telephone: NIA Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10111912015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Sources: EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 Telephone 617-918-1143 EPA Region 3 Telephone 215-814-5418 EPA Region 4 Telephone 404-562-8033 EPA Region 5 Telephone 312-886-6686 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-9474246 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: EPA Telephone: NIA Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 1011912015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file lions against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/3011994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-5644267 Last EDR Contact: 08/1512011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC4399470.13s Page GR -1 Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04108/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 75 Federal CERCLIS list Source: EPA Telephone: NIA Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2015 Date Data Arrived at EOR: 04/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 07/1012015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10119/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 94 Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List Source: EPA Telephone: 703-412-9810 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09107/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CERCLIS-NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 10/2512013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 94 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list Source: EPA Telephone: 703-412-9810 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. TC4399470.13s Page GR -2 Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10112/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Federal RCRA generators list Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800438-2474 Last EDR Contact: 06/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10112/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03110/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-438-2474 Last EDR Contact: 06/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generale between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/3112015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800438-2474 Last EDR Contact: 06/2612G1 5 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800438-2474 Last EDR Contact: 06/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4399470.13s Page GR -3 Federal Institutional controls /engineering controls registries LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCfS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 05/28/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 08/12/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/30/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 03/16/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06102/2015 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 03/16/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/0212015 Number of Days to Update: 77 Federal ERNS list Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notificatlon System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2015 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Telephone: 202-267-2180 Date Made Active in Reports: 06102/2015 Last EDR Contact: 06/26/2015 Number of Days to Update: 63 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS SHWS: This state does not maintain a SHWS list. See the Federal CERCLIS list and Federal NPL list. State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially responsible parties. Available information varies by state. Date of Government Version: NIA Source: Department of Environmental Quality Date Data Arrived at EDR: NIA Telephone: 804-698-4236 Date Made Active in Reports: NIA Last EDR Contact: 06/1812015 Number of Days to Update: NIA Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2015 Data Release Frequency: NIA TC4399470.13s Page GR -4 State and tribal landfill and/orsolid waste disposal site lists SWFILF: Solid Waste Management Facilities Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWFILF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 04/17/2015 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/20/2015 Telephone: 804-698-4238 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2015 Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2015 Number of Days to Update: 4 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST REG TD: leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites Leaking underground storage tank site locations. Includes: counties of Accomack, Isle of Wight, James City, Northampton, Southampton, York; cities of Chesapeake, Franklin, Hampton, Newport News, Norfolk, Poquoson, Portsmouth, Suffolk, Virginia Beach, Williamsburg. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2013 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Tidewater Regional Office Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/05/2013 Telephone: trofoia@deq.vir Date Made Active in Reports: 09/16/2013 Last EDR Contact: 06124/2015 Number of Days to Update: 73 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG SW: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking underground storage tank site locations. Includes: counties of Bland, Buchanan, Carroll, Dickenson, Grayson, Lee, Russell, Scott, Smyth, Tazewell, Washington, Wise, Wythe; cities of Bristol, Galax, Norton, Date of Government Version: 07/15/2013 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Southwest Regional Office Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/18/2013 Telephone: 276-676-4800 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/1612013 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Number of Days to Update! 60 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG SC: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Leaking underground storage tank site locations. Includes: counties of Amherst, Appomattox, Buckingham, Campbell, Charlotte, Cumberland, Halifax, Lunenburg, Mecklenburg, Nottoway, Pittsylvania, Prince Deward; cities of Danville, Lynchburg. Date of Government Version: 09/06/2013 Source: Department of Environmental Quality, South Central Region Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09106/2013 Telephone: 434-582-5120 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2013 Last EDR Contact: 06/0112015 Number of Days to Update: 11 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually LUST REG PD: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites Leaking underground storage tank site locaitons. Includes: counties of Amelia, Brunswick, Charles City, Chesterfield, Dinwiddie, Essex, Gloucester, Goochland, Greensville, Hanover, Henrico, King and Queen, King William, Lancaster, Mathews, Middlesex, New Kent, Northumberland, Powhatan, Prince George, Richmond, Surry, Sussex, Westmoreland; cities of Colonial Heights, Emporia, Hopewell, Petersburg. Date of Government Version: 12/02/2014 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Piedmont Regional Office Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12104/2014 Telephone: 804-527-5020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/16/2015 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Number of Days to Update: 43 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4399470.13s Page GR -5 LUST REG VA: Leaking Underground Storage Tank List Leaking underground storage tank site locations. Includes: counties of Albemarle, Augusta, Bath, Clarke, Fluvanna, Frederick, Greene, Highland, Nelson, Page, Rockbridge, Rockingham, Shenandoah, Warren; cities of Buena Vista, Charlottesville, Harrisonburg, Lexington, Staunton, Waynesboro, Winchester. Date of Government Version: 12/06/2011 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Valley Regional Office Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2011 Telephone: 540-574-7800 Dale Made Active in Reports: 01116/2012 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Number of Days to Update: 39 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/1412015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG WC: Leaking Underground Storage Tank List Leaking underground storage tank site locations. Includes: counties of Alleghany, Bedford, Botetourt, Craig, Floyd, Franklin, Giles, Henry, Montgomery, Patrick, Pulaski, Roanoke, cities of Bedford, Clifton Forge, Covington, Martinsville, Radford, Roanoke, Salem. Date of Government Version: 06/04/2015 Source: Department of Environmental Quality West Central Regional Office Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/05/2015 Telephone: 540-562-6700 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/07/2015 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Number of Days to Update: 32 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG NO: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Tracking Database Leaking underground storage tank site locations. Includes: counties of Arlington, Caroline, Culpeper, Fairfax, Fauquier, King George, Loudoun, Louisa, Madison, Orange, Prince William, Rappahannock, Spotsylvania, Stafford; cities of Alexandria, Fairfaxr Falls Church, Fredericksburg, Manassas, Manassas Park. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2004 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Northern Regional Office Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/22/2004 Telephone: 703-583-3800 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2004 Last EDR Contact: 09106/2011 Number of Days to Update: 48 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 02/03/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/30/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 0612212015 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 07/3112015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11109/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 03/17/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/2212015 Number of bays to Update: 52 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11109/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4399470.13s Page GR -6 INDIAN LUST RT Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTS on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 03130/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2015 Dale Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 07122/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming, Date of Government Version: 04/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 07/2212015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/0912015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 01/08/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01108/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11 /0912015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 02/03/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/12/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 07/2212015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 04/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies LTANKS: Leaking Petroleum Storage Tanks Includes releases of petroleum from underground storage tanks and aboveground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 05/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/01/2015 Number of Days to Update: 28 State and tribal registered storage tank lists Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-6984010 Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 0911412015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 01101/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 07/10/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4399470.13s Page GR -7 UST: Registered Petroleum Storage Tanks Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST's are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available information varies by state program. Date of Government Version: 0 510 112 0 1 5 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06103/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/01/2015 Number of Days to Update: 28 AST: Registered Petroleum Storage Tanks Registered Aboveground Storage Tanks. Dale of Government Version: 05/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06103/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/01/2015 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-6984010 Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-6984010 Last EDR Contact: 06103/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 03/1712015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/2212015 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/3012015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 07122/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 12114/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact! 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 05/06/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4399470.13s Page GR -8 INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/3012015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/2612015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 09/30/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/0312015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 02/03/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04130/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 0612212015 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 09/23/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 1112512014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal Institutional control / engineering control registries ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites Listing A listing of sites with Engineering Controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 06/23/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/26/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/01/2015 Number of Days to Update: 5 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804698-4228 Last EDR Contact: 09129/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/1212015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INST CONTROL: Voluntary Remediation Program Database Sites included in the Voluntary Remediation Program database that have deed restrictions. Date of Government Version: 06/23/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06126/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/01/2015 Number of Days to Update: 5 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4228 Last EDR Contact: 09/2912015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10112/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4399470,13s Page GR -9 State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 09/29/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/01/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2014 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 06/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/1212015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies VRP: Voluntary Remediation Program The Voluntary Cleanup Program encourages owners of elected contaminated sites to take the initiative and conduct voluntary cleanups that meet state environmental standards. Date of Government Version: 06123/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06126/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/01/2015 Number of Days to Update: 5 State and tribal Brownflelds sites Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4228 Last EDR Contact: 09/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/1212015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Site Specific Assessments To qualify for Brownfields Assessment, the site must meet the Federal definition of a Brownfields and should have contaminant issues that need to be addressed and a redevelopment plan supported by the local government and community. Virginia's Department of Environmental Quality performs brownfields assessments under a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency at no cost to communities, property owners or, prospective purchasers. The assessment is an evaluation of environmental impacts caused by previous site uses similar to a Phase 11 Environmental Assessment. Date of Government Version: 07/28/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2015 Number of Days to Update: 26 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4207 Last EDR Contact: 07/28/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. TC4399470.13s Page GR -10 GOVERNMENT2EGORDS'SEARCI ED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKIIJG Date of Government Version: 03/23/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/24/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 06/24/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Local Lists of Landfill/ Solid Waste Disposal Sites INDIAN ODE: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 1210312007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 05/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Dale of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: NIA Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Dale of Government Version: 0 1/1212009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release f=requency: No Update Planned Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 02/25/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 0312512015 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S, Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. TC4399470.13s Page GR -11 Date of Government Version: 02125112015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03110/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2015 Number of Days to Update: 15 Local Land Records Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA ('Superfund') lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination, CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 0211812014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 37 Records of Emergency Release Reports Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 07/2212015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT, Date of Government Version: 03/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: U,S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 06/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually SPILLS WC: Prep Database The Department of Environmental Quality's POLLUTION RESPONSE PROGRAM, known as PREP, provides for responses to air, water, and waste pollution incidents in order to protect human health and the environment. Date of Government Version: 09/21/2009 Source: Department of Environmental Quality, West Central Region Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2009 Telephone: 540-562-6700 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/30/2009 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2011 Number of Days to Update: 31 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12119/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SPILLS VA: PREP Database The Department of Environmental Quality's POLLUTION RESPONSE PROGRAM, known as PREP, provides for responses to air, water, and waste pollution incidents in order to protect human health and the environment. Date of Government Version: 08/08/2012 Source: Department of Environmental Quality, Valley Regional Office Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2012 Telephone: 540-574-7800 Date Made Active in Reports: 10105/2012 Last EDR Contact: 05/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 57 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/19/2013 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SPILLS TD: PREP Database The Department of Environmental Quality's POLLUTION RESPONSE PROGRAM, known as PREP, provides for responses to air, water, and waste pollution incidents in order to protect human health and the environment. Date of Government Version: 09117/2009 Dale Data Arrived at EDR: 09/23/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2009 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Environmental Quality, Tidewater Region Telephone: trofola@deq.vir Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12119/2011 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4399470.13s Page GR -12 SPILLS SW: Reportable Spills The Department of Environmental Quality's POLLUTION RESPONSE PROGRAM, known as PREP, provides for responses to air, water, and waste pollution incidents in order to protect human health and the environment. Date of Government Version: 01/21/2010 Source: Department of Environmental Quality, Southwest Region Date Data Arrived at EDR; 01/22/2010 Telephone: 276-6764839 Date Made Active in Reports: 02116/2010 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2012 Number of Days to Update: 25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 1012912012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SPILLS PD: PREP Database The Department of Environmental Quality's POLLUTION RESPONSE PROGRAM, known as PREP, provides for responses to air, water, and waste pollution incidents in order to protect human health and the environment. Date of Government Version: 10/20/2009 Source: Department of Environmental Quality, Piedmont Region Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2009 Telephone: 804-527-5020 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2009 Last EDR Contact: 02/06/2012 Number of Days to Update: 35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/21/20112 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SPILLS NO: PREP Database The Department of Environmental Quality's POLLUTION RESPONSE PROGRAM, known as PREP, provides for responses to air, water, and waste pollution incidents in order to protect human health and the environment. Date of Government Version: 09/23/2009 Source: Department of Environmental Quality, Northern Region Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2009 Telephone: 703-583-3864 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/30/2009 Last EDR Contact: 09106/2011 Number of Days to Update: 31 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SPILLS PC: Pollution Complaint Database Pollution Complaints Database. The pollution reports contained in the PC database include the initial release reporting of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks and all other releases of petroleum to the environment as well as releases to state waters. The database is current through 1211193. Since that time, all spill and pollution reporting information has been collected and tracked through the DEQ regional offices. Date of Government Version: 06/01/1996 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/22/1996 Telephone: 804-698-4287 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/21/1996 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2010 Number of Days to Update: 30 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/21/2010 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SPILLS BRL: Prep/Spills Database Listing A listing of spills locations located in the Blue Ridge Regional area, Lynchburg. Date of Government Version: 09/18/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/18/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2009 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: DEQ, Blue Ridge Regional Office Telephone: 434-582-6218 Last EDR Contact: 11 /2812011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies SPILLS: Prep/Spills Database Listing The Department of Environmental Quality's POLLUTION RESPONSE PROGRAM, known as PREP, provides for responses to air, water, and waste pollution incidents in order to protect human health and the environment. PREP staff often work to assist local emergency responders, other state agencies, federal agencies, and responsible parties, as may be needed, to manage pollution incidents. Oil spills, fish kills, and hazardous materials spills are examples of incidents that may involve the DEQ's PREP Program. Date of Government Version: G5/01/2015 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2015 Telephone: 804-698-4287 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/01/2015 Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 28 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4399470.13s Page GR -13 SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil andlor hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90. Date of Government Version: 09/01/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/15/2013 Number of Days to Update: 43 Other Ascertainable Records Source: FirstSearch Telephone: NIA Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: NIA Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned RCRA NonGen 1 NLR: RCRA - Non Generators 1 No Longer Regulated RCRAlnfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-438-2474 Last EDR Contact: 06/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 07/08/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 07/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 339 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 07/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10128/2015 Data Release Frequency: NIA SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. TC4399470.13s Page GR -14 Date of Government Version: 03/07/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2011 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 05/21/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08131/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post -closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 03/09/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2015 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 08/12/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/30/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a stale or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 08/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. Date of Government Version: 04/22/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/0312015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03109/2015 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact: 05/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08124/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/15/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 06/2512015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2015 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. TC4399470.13s Page GR -15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING . Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/12/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 0610212015 Number of Days to Update: 110 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 01/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/08/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Slat. 829) requires all registered pesticide -producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/2512011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 07/2212015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 11/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/1212013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 06/1212015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually RMP: Risk Management Plans When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03126/2015 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RC RA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC4399470.13s Page GR -16 PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 1012512013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/17/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 05/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/24/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PGB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 07101/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/15/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 01/23/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-5088 Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10128/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS: FIFRAI TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Telephone: 202-566-1667 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact: 05120/2015 Number of Days to Update: 25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS INSP: FIFRA! TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 05/20/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MILTS: Material licensing Tracking System MILTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 03/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/09/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 0611112015 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4399470.13s Page GR -17 COAL ASH DOE: Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Verslow 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10128/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11012014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: NIA Last EDR Contact: 06/12/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11109/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. Date of Government Version: 04/07/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/09/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FITS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRAIFSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions, The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 1 011 9/20G6 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03101/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact! 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03117/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRAITSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRAITSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated, TC4399470.13s Page GR -18 Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/1012007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/1712008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012 Telephone: 202-366-4595 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012 Last EDR Contact: 08/04/2015 Number of Days to Update: 42 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/17/2015 Telephone: Varies Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 46 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LOG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12131/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/2 612 01 3 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/19/2013 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Biennially INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres, Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 07/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually UMTRA: Uranium MITI Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand -like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version: 09114/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10107/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 146 LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 05/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4399470.13s Page GR -19 Date of Government Version: 11/25/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/26/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931 and 1964. These sites may pose a throat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/0212010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: NIA Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub -system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants, Date of Government Version: 10/16/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 1 111 7/2014 Number of Days to Update: 17 US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/16/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10122/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version: 12/30/2014 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Date Data Arrived at EDR: 1213112014 Telephone: $03-231-5959 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 29 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States. Date of Government Version: 12/0512006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/29/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2008 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 06/05/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 0911412015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4399470.13s Page GR -20 US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team of the USGS. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 06/05/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release f=requency: Varies FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C -DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 01/18/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2015 Number of Days to Update: 26 AIRS: Permitted Airs Facility List A listing of permitted Airs facilities. Date of Government Version: 06/11/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06112/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/01/2015 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: EPA Telephone: (215) 814-5000 Last EDR Contact: 06/10/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4000 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/1412015 Data Release Frequency: Varies CEDS: Comprehensive Environmental Data System Virginia Water Protection Permits, Virginia Pollution Discharge System (point discharge) permits and Virginia Pollution Abatement (no point discharge) permits. Date of Government Version: 06/08/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/01/2015 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4077 Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release f=requency: Semi -Annually COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites A listing of facilities with coal ash Impoundments. Date of Government Version: 07/29/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 21 DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaner List A listing of registered drycleaners. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04123/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2015 Number of Days to Update: 1 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 804-698-4285 Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4407 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4399470.13s Page GR -21 ENFORCEMENT: Enforcement Actions Data A listing of enforcement actions. Date of Government Version: 06/16/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 0 611 81201 5 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/07/2015 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4031 Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 05/02/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-6984205 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11116/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information listing Solid waste financial assurance information. Date of Government Version: 05/02/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4123 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2015 Next Scheduled ERR Contact: 11/16/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TIER 2: Tier 2 Information Listing A listing of facilities which store or manufacture hazardous materials and submit a chemical Inventory report. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/21/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/19/2013 Number of Days to Update: 60 UIC: Underground Injection Control Wells A listing of underground injection controls wells. Date of Government Version: 08/04/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2015 Number of Days to Update: 18 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4159 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/0512015 Data Release Frequency: Annually Source: Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy Telephone: 276-415-9700 Last EDR Contact: 08/06/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR's researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of sail and groundwater contamination. TC4399470,13s Page GR -22 Date of Government Version: NIA Source: EDR, Inc. Date Data Arrived at EDR: NIA Telephone: NIA Date Made Active in Reports: NIA Last EDR Contact: NIA Number of Days to Update: NIA Next Scheduled EDR Contact: NIA Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR US Hist Auto Stat: EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, Include gas stationlfilling stationtservice station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service stationr service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: NIA Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: NIA Number of Days to Update: NIA Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: NIA Last EDR Contact: NIA Next Scheduled EDR Contact: NIA Data Release Frequenoy: Varies EDR US Hist Cleaners: EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: NIA Source: EDR, Inc. Date Data Arrived at EDR: NIA Telephone: NIA Date Made Active in Reports: NIA Last EDR Contact: NIA Number of Days to Update: NIA Next Scheduled EDR Contact: NIA Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environmental Quality in Virgina. Date of Government Version: NIA Source: Department of Environmental Quality Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07101/2013 Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports; 01/20/2014 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 203 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: NIA Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environmental Quality in Virgina and at the Regional VA Levels. Dale of Government Version: NIA Source: Department of Environmental Quality Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: NIA Date Made Active in Reports: 01/15/2014 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 198 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: NIA Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4399470.13s Page GR -23 OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 07/3012013 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08119/2013 Telephone: 860-424-3375 Date Made Active in Reports: 10103/2013 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2015 Number of Days to Update: 45 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/31/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/17/2015 Telephone: NIA Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2015 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 26 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 08/01/2015 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2016 Telephone: 518-402-8651 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2015 Last EDR Contact: 08/06/2015 Number of Days to Update: 18 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/24/2015 Telephone: 717-783-8990 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/18/2015 Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2015 Number of Days to Update: 25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version: 12131/2013 Source: Department of Environmental Management Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2015 Telephone: 401-222-2797 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/15/2015 Last EDR Contact: 05/26/2015 Number of Days to Update: 26 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03119/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2015 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: NIA Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC4399470.13s Page GR -24 Oil/Gas Pipelines Source: PennWell Corporation Telephone: 281-546-1505 Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPGINGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation, This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: PennWell Corporation Telephone: 800-823-6277 This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United Slates. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities Source: Department of Social Services Telephone: 804-692-1900 Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100 -year and 500 -year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Current USGS 7,5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey TC4399470.13s Page GR -25 STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION O 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC4399470.13s Page GR -26 TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS HOLLINS ROAD VAROHRI 5119 HOLLINS ROAD ROANOKE, VA 24019 TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES Latitude (North): Longitude (West): Universal Tranverse Mercator: UTM X (Meters): UTM Y (Meters): Elevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Target Property Map: Version Date: 37.3291 - 37° 19'44,76" 79.9257 - 79° 55'32.52" Zone 17 595177.2 4131718.5 1049 ft. above sea level 5948970 ROANOKE, VA 2013 EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components: 1. Groundwater flow direction, and 2. Groundwater flow velocity. Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the geologic strata. TC4399470.13s Page A-1 GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY General Topographic Gradient: General West SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES C! 0 Oa+ a y ? m N A ? N m b W V V W _ _ _ _ _ _ _ �. 10 fO V V . ... ... ... m . .. . W. . .. North I South TP N 0 West Target Property Elevation: 1049 ft. I East TP 0 1/2 1 Miles Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. TC4399470.13s Page A-2 W C w N O � � W N V _ . _ . .. . .. . .. . . . _ . _ . _ . _ . West Target Property Elevation: 1049 ft. I East TP 0 1/2 1 Miles Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. TC4399470.13s Page A-2 HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways and bodies of water). FEMA FLOOD ZONE Target Property Count ROANOKE,VA Flood Plain Panel at Target Property: Additional Panels in search area: NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Quad at Target Prope ROANOKE FEMA Flood Electronic Data YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map 51161 C - FEMA DFIRM Flood data 51161CO024D - FEMA Q3 Flood data 51161CO028D - FEMA Q3 Flood data NWI Electronic Data Coverage YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. Site -Specific Hydrogeological Data': Search Radius: 1.25 miles Status: Not found AQUIFL.OW® Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW Not Reported 01996 Site-spedbc h drogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Aterts, rnc., Bainbridge Island, WA. Atl rights reserved, All of Lhe information and opinions presantad are those of Lhe cited EPA repon(s), whleh were completed under a comprehensive fYnvlmnmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigat on. TC4399470.13s Page A-3 GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes move more quickly through sandy -gravelly types of soils than silty -clayey types of soils. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed at which contaminant migration may be occurring. ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Era: Paleozoic Category: Stratifed Sequence System: Silurian Series: Silurian Code: S (decoded above as Era, System & Series) Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). TC4399470.13s Page AA SSURGO SOIL MAP - 4399470.13s Target Properly SSURGO Soil Ovate r P 146 ISS F01,1a SITE NAME: Hollins Road VAROHRI CLIENT: Mead & Hunt ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road CONTACT: Teresa Schuller Roanoke VA 24019 INQUIRY #: 4399470.13s LATILONG: 37.3291 179.9257 DATE: September 01, 2015 4:38 pm DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. Soil Map ID: 1 Soil Component Name: Tumbling Soil Surface Texture: loam Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches Soil Layer Information Saturated Boundary Classification hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro misec (pH) 1 0 inches 11 inches loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay. Soils. FINE-GRAINED SOILS, Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50%), silt. 2 11 inches 61 inches gravelly clay Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50%), silt. Soils. TC4399470.13s Page A-6 Soil Map ID: 2 Soil Component Name: Soil Surface Texture Hydrologic Group: Soil Drainage Class: Hydric Status: Not hydric Tumbling loam Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Well drained Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro misec (pH) 1 0 inches 11 inches loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay. Soils. FINE-GRAINED SOILS, Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50%), silt. 2 11 inches 61 inches gravelly clay Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200). Clayey 50%), silt. Soils. Soil Map ID: 3 Soil Component Name: Soil Surface Texture: Hydrologic Group: Soil Drainage Class: Frederick silt loam Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Well drained TC4399470.13s Page A-7 Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches Soil Layer Information Well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Saturated Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Boundary > 0 inches Classification hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro misec (pH) 1 0 inches 11 inches slit loam Slit -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 42 Max: 6 Min: Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 14 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50%), Lean Clay Soils. 2 11 inches 72 inches clay Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max; 14 Max: 6 Min: Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit 50% or 200), Clayey more), Fat Clay. Soils. Soil Map ID: 4 Soil Component Name: Tumbling Soil Surface Texture: loam Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches TC4399470.13s rage A-8 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification hydraulic Y conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro misec (pH) 1 0 inches 11 inches loam Slit -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay. Soils. FINE-GRAINED SOILS, Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50%), silt. 2 11 inches 61 inches gravelly clay Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50%). silt. Soils. Soil Map ID: 5 Soil Component Name: Frederick Soil Surface Texture: slit loam Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches TC4399470.13s Page A-9 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro misec (pH) 1 0 inches 11 inches silt loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 42 Max: 6 Min: Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 14 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50%), Lean Clay Soils. 2 11 inches 72 inches clay Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 6 Min: Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit 50% or 200), Clayey more), Fat Clay. Soils. Soil Map ID: 6 Soil Component Name: Frederick Soil Surface Texture: silt loam Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro misec (pH) 1 0 inches 11 inches silt loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 42 Max: 6 Min: Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 14 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50%), Lean Clay Soils. TC4399470.13s Page A-10 Soil Layer Information Saturated Boundary Classification hydraulic conductivity micro misec Soil Reaction (pH) Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil 2 11 inches 72 inches clay Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 6 Min: Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit 50% or 200), Clayey more), Fat Clay. Soils. SOILS, Sands, Soil Map ID: 7 Soil Component Name: Laidig Soil Surface Texture: fine sandy loam Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 99 inches Soil Layer Information Saturated Boundary Classification hydraulic conductivity micro misec Solt Reaction (pH) Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil 1 -07,n,-hs 5 inches fine sandy loam Silt -Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 42 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 14 Min: 3.6 than 35 pct. Sands with fines, passing No. Clayey sand. 200), Silty COARSE-GRAINED Soils. SOILS, Sands, Sands with fines, Siltv Sand. 2 5 inches 31 inches cobbly loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 42 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 3.6 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay Soils. TC4399470.13s Page A-11 Soil Layer Information FINE-GRAINED Soil Component Name: Wheeling Soil Surface Texture: Saturated Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, Boundary moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Classification hydraulic conductivity micro misec Soil Reaction (pH) Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Solt 3 31 inches 61 inches loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 4 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.42 Min: 3.6 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay Soils. Soil Map ID: 8 FINE-GRAINED Soil Component Name: Wheeling Soil Surface Texture: loam Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, 200), Silty moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Soils. textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Low Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil 1 0 inches 111 inches [ loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Materials (more SOILS, Silts and than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 506/6), Lean Clay. Soils. FINE-GRAINED SOILS, Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50%), silt. hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction micro misec (pH) Max: 42 Max: 6 Min: Min; 4 5.1 TC4399470,13s Page A-12 Soil Layer Information SEARCH DISTANCE miles Federal USGS 1.000 Federal FRDS PWS Nearest PWS within 1 mile State Database 1.000 Boundary Classification hydraulic conductivity misec Soil Reaction (pH) tLayerUpper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soli micro 2 11 inches 70 inches loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 6 Min: Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 5.1 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50%), Lean Clay Soils. 3 70 inches 74 inches gravelly sand Gran7(35SOILS ARSE-GRAINED Max: 141 Max: 6 Min: mate, Sands, Min: 42 5.1 pct. oan Sands, passorly graded 200),d. Frag,ARSE-GRAINED Gravel and SOILS, Sands, Sand. Sands with fines, Silty Sand. LOCAL I REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE miles Federal USGS 1.000 Federal FRDS PWS Nearest PWS within 1 mile State Database 1.000 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION MAP ID WELL ID USGS40001203134 FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION MAP ID WELL ID LOCATION FROM TP 112 - 1 Mile 5t LOCATION FROM TP No PWS System Found Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. TC4393470.13s Page A-13 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP No Wells Found TC4399470,13s Page A-14 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP - 4399470.13s /V County Boundary v 9 44 /V Major Roads } Groundwater Flow Direction Contour Lines O Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater I Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location c v Groundwater Flow Varies at Location Q Water Wells ® Closest Hydrogeological Data [Pj Publlo Water Supply Wells i Cluster of Multiple Icons SITE NAME: Hollins Road VAROHRI CLIENT: Mead & Hunt ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road CONTACT: Teresa Schuller Roanoke VA 24019 INQUIRY #: 4399470.13s LAT/LONG: 37.3291 179.9257 DATE: September 41, 2015 4:38 pm ►.. Direction Distance Elevation Database EDR ID Number 1 SE FED USGS USGS40001203134 112 -1 Mile Higher Org.Identifier: USGS-VA Formal name: USGS Virginia Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-371905079545401 Monloc name: 31G 6 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 03010101 Drainagearea value: Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: Longitude: -79.9147608 Sourcemap scale: Horiz Acc measure: 5 Horiz Acc measure units Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Elbrook Formation Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19720725 Welldepth: Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: Wellholedepth units: ft Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 Not Reported Not Reported 37.3181917 24000 seconds 1100.00 010 US 93 93 TC4399470.13s Page A-16 AREA RADON INFORMATION EPA Region 3 Statistical Summary Readings for Zip Code: 24019 Number of sites tested: 323. Maximum Radon Level: 79.7 pCi1L. Minimum Radon Level: 0.5 pCI1L. pCi1L pC11L pCi/L pCi1L <4 4-10 10-20 20-50 203 (62.85%) 80(24.77%) 28(8.67%) 11(3,41% Federal EPA Radon Zone for ROANOKE County: 1 Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 PC!/L. Zone 2 indoor average level >- 2 pCi1L and <= 4 pCi/L. Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi1L. pC11L 50-100 pCi1L >100 1 (0,31%) 0(0.00%) TC4399470.13s Page A-17 TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000 -scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U,S. Geological Survey HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100 -year and 500 -year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOWR Information System Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J, Bawlec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672.5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Services, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC4399470.13s Page PSGR-1 LOCAL 1 REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data Includes Information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. STATE RECORDS Virginia Public Water Supplies Source: Department of Health, Office of Water Programs Telephone: 804-786-1756 OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION Virginia Oil and Gas Wells Source: Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy Telephone: 804-692-3200 A listing of oil and gas well locations RADON Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of iRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. EPA Region 3 Statistical Summary Readings Source: Region 3 EPA Telephone: 215-814-2082 Radon readings for Delaware, D.C,, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia and West Virginia. OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Earthquake f=ault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR's Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey TC4399470.13s Page PSGR-2 STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC4399470.13s Page PSGR-3 Hollins Road VAROHR1 5119 Hollins Road Roanoke, VA 24019 Inquiry Number: 4399470.17s September 2, 2015 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 (rEDR("Environmental Data Resources Inc www.edrnet.com SECTION PAGE Executive Summary---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ES1 PrimaryMap------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2 SecondaryMap---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 AerialPhotography ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- 4 MapFindings----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 Record Sources and Currency----------------------------------------------------------- ------- GRA Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice The EDR Vapor Encroachment Worksheet enables EDR's customers to make certain online modifications that effects maps, text and calculations contained in this Report, As a result, maps, text and calculations contained in this Report may have been so modified. EDR has not taken any action to verify any such modifications, and this report and the findings set forth herein must be read in light of this fact. Environmental Data Resources shall not be responsible for any customer's decision to include or not include in any final report any records determined to be within the relevant minimum search distances. This report contains information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANYSUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES.ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, or risk codes provided in this report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assesment performed by an environmental professional can produce information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc, All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TC Pagel A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of the ASTM Standard Practice for Assessment of Vapor Encroachment into Structures on Properly Involved in Real Estate Transactions (E 2600-10). HISTORICAL USE RECORDS Former manufactured Gas Plants 0.333 0 0 0 Historical Gas Stations 0.25 0 0 0 Historical Dry Cleaners 0.25 0 0 0 Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives property 0 - *Each category may include several separate databases, each having a different search distance. For each category, the table reports the maximum search distance applied. See the section 'Record Sources and Currency' for information on individual databases. TC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Summary M CL G T r r O STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Maximum Search Distance* �- Federal NPL 0.333 0 0 0 Federal CERCLIS 0.333 0 0 0 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 0.333 0 0 0 Federal RCRA TSD facilities list 0.333 0 0 0 Federal RCRA generators list property 0 - - Federal institutional controls 1 engineering controls registries 0.333 0 0 0 Federal ERNS list property 0 - - State and tribal - equivalent NPL not searched - - - State and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS 0.333 0 0 0 State and tribal landfill 1 solid waste disposal 0.333 0 0 0 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 0.333 0 0 0 State and tribal registered storage tank lists property 0 - - State and tribal Institutional control 1 engineering control registries property 0 - - State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0.333 0 0 0 State and tribal Brownfields sites 0.333 0 0 0 Other Standard Environmental Records 0.333 0 0 0 HISTORICAL USE RECORDS Former manufactured Gas Plants 0.333 0 0 0 Historical Gas Stations 0.25 0 0 0 Historical Dry Cleaners 0.25 0 0 0 Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives property 0 - *Each category may include several separate databases, each having a different search distance. For each category, the table reports the maximum search distance applied. See the section 'Record Sources and Currency' for information on individual databases. TC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS HOLLINS ROAD VAROHRI 5119 HOLLINS ROAD ROANOKE, VA 24019 COORDINATES Latitude (North): 37.3291 - 37° 19'44.765625' Longitude (West): 79.9257 - 79'55'32.510376' Elevation: 1049 ft. above sea level TC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 PHYSICAL SETTING INFORMATION Flood Zone: Available NWI Wetlands: Available AQUIFLOWa Search Radius: 0.333 Mile. No Aquiflow sites reported. DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. Soil Map ID: 1 Soil Component Name: Tumbling Soil Surface Texture: loam Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, Boundary moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Classification textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches Soil Layer Information Saturated Boundary Classification hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro misec (pH) 1 0 inches 11 inches loam Slit -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay. Soils. FINE-GRAINED SOILS, Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50%), silt. TC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Soil Layer Information Well drained Saturated Not hydric Boundary Classification hydraulic Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity micro misec Boil Reaction (pH) 2 11 inches 61 inches gravelly clay Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 5.5 Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid Saturated passing No. limit less than Classification hydraulic conductivity micro misec Soil Reaction (pH) Layer 200), Clayey 50%), silt. Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil 1 0 inches 11 inches Soils. Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Soil Map ID: 2 Soil Component Name: Tumbling Soil Surface Texture: loam Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches Soil Layer Information Saturated Boundary Classification hydraulic conductivity micro misec Soil Reaction (pH) Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil 1 0 inches 11 inches loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No, limit less than 200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay. Soils. FINE-GRAINED SOILS, Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50%), silt. TC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro misec (pH) 2 11 inches 61 inches gravelly clay Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50%), silt. Soils. Soil Map ID: 3 Soil Component Name: Frederick Soil Surface Texture: silt loam Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro misec (pH) 1 0 inches 11 inches silt loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 42 Max: 6 Min: Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 14 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50%), Lean Clay Soils. 2 11 inches 72 inches clay Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 6 Min: Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit 50% or 200), Clayey more), Fat Clay. Soils. TC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 Solt Map ID: 4 Soil Component Name: Soil Surface Texture: Hydrologic Group: Tumbling loam Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro misec (pH) 1 0 inches 11 inches loam Slit -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay. Soils. FINE-GRAINED SOILS, Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50%), Silt. 2 11 inches 61 inches gravelly clay Slit -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50%), silt. Soils. Soil Map ID: 5 Soil Component Name Soil Surface Texture: Hydrologic Group: Soil Drainage Class: Frederick slit loam Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Well drained TC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Frederick Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro misec (pH) 1 0 inches 11 Inches silt loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 42 Max: 6 Min: Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 14 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50%), Lean Clay Soils. 2 11 inches 72 inches clay Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 6 Min: Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit 50% or 200), Clayey more), Fat Clay, Soils. Soil Map ID: 6 Soil Component Name: Frederick Soil Surface Texture: silt loam Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches TC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 Soil Layer Information Saturated Boundary Classification hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro misec (pH) 1 0 inches 11 inches silt loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 42 Max: 6 Min: Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 14 4.5 than 35 pct, Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50%), Lean Clay Soils. SOILS, Sands, 2 11 inches 72 inches clay Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 6 Min: Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 4,5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit 50% or 200), Clayey more), Fat Clay. Soils, Soil Map ID: 7 Soil Component Name: Soil Surface Texture: Hydrologic Group: Soil Drainage Class: Hydric Status: Laidig fine sandy loam Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. Well drained Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 99 Inches Soil Layer Information Saturated Boundary Classification hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Solt Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro misec (pH) 1 0 inches 5 inches fine sandy loam Silt -Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 42 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 14 Min: 3.6 than 35 pct. Sands with fines, passing No. Clayey sand. 200), Silty COARSE-GRAINED Soils. SOILS, Sands, Sands with fines, Silty Sand. TC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 Soil Layer Information ed Boundary Classification —hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Sol[ micro m/sec (pH) 2 5 inches 31 inches cobbly loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max; 42 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 3.6 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay Soils. FINE-GRAINED 3 31 inches 61 inches loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 4 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.42 Min: 3.6 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay Soils. Soil Map ID: 8 Soil Component Name: Wheeling Soil Surface Texture: loam Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Low Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches Soil Layer Information ed Boundary Classification hydraulic Y ailt conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro m/sec (pH) 1 0 inches 11 inches team Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 42 Max: 6 Mln: Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 5.1 than 35 pct, Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay. Soils. FINE-GRAINED SOILS, Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50%), silt. TC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro misec (pH) 2 11 inches 70 inches loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max; 14 Max: 6 Min: Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 5.1 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50%), Lean Clay Soils. 3 70 inches 74 inches gravelly sand Granular COARSE-GRAINED Max: 141 Max: 6 Min: materials (35 SOILS, Sands, Min: 42 5.1 pct. or less Clean Sands, passing No. Poorly graded 200)r Stone sand. Fragments, COARSE-GRAINED Gravel and SOILS, Sands, Sand. Sands with fines, Silty Sand. Soil Map ID: 9 Soil Component Name: Water Soil Surface Texture: loam Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Soil Drainage Class: Hydric Status: Unknown Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Not Reported Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches No Layer Information available. Soil Map ID: 10 Soil Component Name: Frederick Soil Surface Texture: clay Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained TC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches Soil Layer Information Tumbling Soil Surface Texture: loam Hydrologic Group: Saturated moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Boundary textures. Classification Y conductivity micro misec Soil Reaction (pH) Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil 1 11 inches 72 inches clay Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 6 Min: Materials (more SOILS, Slits and Min: 4 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit 50% or 200), Clayey more), Fal Clay. Soils, 2 0 inches 11 inches very gravelly Silt -Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 42 Max: 6 Min: silt loam Materials (more SOILS, Gravels, Min: 14 4.5 than 35 pct. Gravels with passing No. fines, Clayey 200), Clayey Gravel Soils. Soil Map ID: 11 Sol] Component Name: Tumbling Soil Surface Texture: loam Hydrologic Group: Class B _ Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches TC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro misec (pH) 1 0 inches 11 inches loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay. Soils, FINE-GRAINED SOILS, Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50%), silt. 2 11 inches 61 inches gravelly clay Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No, limit less than 200), Clayey 50%), silt. Soils. TC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 12 SEARCH RESULTS Unmappabie (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Name Not Reported HISTORICAL USE RECORDS Name Not Reported Address Dist/Dir Map ID Page Address Dist/Dir Map ID Page TC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13 PRIMARY MAP - 4399470.17S * Target Property Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property T Sites at elevations lower than the target property A Manufactured Gas Plants 4 Sensitive Receptors 0 National Priority List Sites Dept. Defense Sites a 0 300 1/3 Mlies Indian Reservations BIA -o- Groundwater Flow Direction A/ County Boundary G I Indeterminate Groundwater Power transmission lines Flow at Location Pipelines QV er Flow Varies at Location ® 100 -year flood zone SSURGO Soil 500 -year flood zone SITE NAME: Hollins Road VAROHRI CLIENT: Mead & Hunt ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road CONTACT: Teresa Schuller Roanoke VA 24019 INQUIRY #: 4399470.17s LATILONG: 37.3291/79.9257 DATE: September 01, 2015 5:52 pm SECONDARY MAP - 4399470.17S � Target Property p 113 lr[ I Miles Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property Indian Reservations BIA F Upgradient Area V Sites at elevations lower than Contour Lines the target property /v County Boundary A Manufactured Gas Plants National Priority List Sites Power transmission lines Dept. Defense Sites Pipelines 0 100 -year flood zone 0 500 -year flood zone National Wetland Inventory SITE NAME: Hollins Road VAROHRI CLIENT: Mead & Hunt ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road CONTACT: Teresa Schuller Roanoke VA 24019 INQUIRY #: 4399470.175 LAVLONG: 37.3291 / 79.9257 DATE: September 01, 2015 5:50 pm AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY - 4399470.17s ♦ i + s ' `10 � s t • . v-1 l w� SITE NAME: Hollins Road VAROHRI ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road Roanoke VA 24019 LAV LO N G: 37.3291 179.9257 I CLIENT: Mead & Hunt CONTACT: Teresa Schuller INQU IRY #: 4399470.175 DATE: September 01, 2015 5:53 pm MAP FINDINGS LFGFND FACILITY NAME FACILITY ADDRESS, CITY, ST, ZIP € DR SITE Iii NUMBCR Direction Distance Range (Distance feet 1 miles) ASTM 2600 Record Sources found in this report. Each database searched has been assigned to one or more V MAP ID# categories. For detailed information about categorization, Relative Elevation Feet Above Sea Level see the section of the report Records Searched and Worksheet: Comments: Comments may be added on the online Vapor Encroachment Worksheet. DATABASE ACRONYM: Applicable categories (A hoverbox with database description). TC Page 18 To maintain currency of the following databases, EDR contacts the appropriate agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Source: EPA Number of Days to Update: 3 Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact :05/1412015 RMP: Risk Management Plans Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur, Date of Government Version: 02/01/2015 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Number of Days to Update: 40 Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact :0712212015 2028 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: 0.25 Mile The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites, Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. Date of Government Version: 04/2212013 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Number of Days to Update: 6 Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact :0511412015 CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System Standard Environmental Record Source: Federal CERCLIS Search Distance: 0.333 Mile CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 1012512013 Source: EPA Number of Days to Update: 94 Telephone: 703-412-9810 TC GR 1 Last EDR Contact :0512912015 CERCLIS-NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: 0.333 Mile Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time, This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Source: EPA Number of Days to Update: 94 Telephone: 703-412-9810 Last EDR Contact :0512912015 COAL ASH DOE: Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version, 12131/2005 Source: Department of Energy Number of Days to Update: 76 Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact :0711 312 01 5 COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: 0.333 Mile A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 Last EDR Contact :0611 212 01 5 CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Standard Environmental Record Source: Federal NPL Search Distance: 0.333 Mile Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: Not Reported Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites, Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 12131/2014 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Number of Days to Update: 46 Telephone: Varies Last EDR Contact :0612212015 CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report Standard Environmental Record Source: Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list Search Distance: 0.333 Mile CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Government Version: 0311012015 Source: EPA Number of Days to Update: 72 Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact :0612612015 TC GR 2 DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal landfill 1 solid waste disposal Search Distance: 0.333 Mile A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Source: EPA, Region 9 Number of Days to Update: 137 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact :0712212015 DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Number of Days to Update: 42 Telephone: 202-366-4595 Last EDR Contact :0810412015 Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: 0.333 Mile The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2015 Source: EPA Number of Days to Update: 75 Telephone: Not Reported Last EDR Contact :07/09/2015 EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead Indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version: 08/3012013 Number of Days to Update: 88 Last EDR Contact :0810412015 ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Standard Environmental Record Source: Federal ERNS list Search Distance: Property Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances, Date of Government Version: 03/30/2015 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Number of Days to Update: 63 Telephone: 202-267-2180 TC GR 3 Last EDR Contact :0612612015 FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal registered storage tank lists Search Distance: Property A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2010 Source: FEMA Number of Days to Update: 55 Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact :07/10/2015 FINDS, Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C -DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), HIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCIS Activity Data System). Date of Government Version, 01/18/2015 Source: EPA Number of Days to Update: 26 Telephone: Not Reported Last EDR Contact :0611012015 FTTS: FIFRAI TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Source: EPAlOffice of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Number of Days to Update: 25 Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact :0512012015 FTTS INSP: FIFRAI TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide AcQfTSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records A listing of FIFRAITSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Source: EPA Number of Days to Update: 25 Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact :05120/2016 FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: 0,333 Mile The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 06/0612014 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Number of Days to Update: 8 Telephone: 202-528-4285 TC GR 4 Last EDR Contact :0710812015 HIST FTTS: FIFRAITSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRAITSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/1912006 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Number of Days to Update: 40 Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact :12/1712007 HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Last EDR Contact :06/2612015 Source: U,S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 01/23/2015 Number of Days to Update: 31 Last EDR Contact :07109/2015 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-5088 INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal leaking storage tank lists Search Distance: 0.333 Mile A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land, Date of Government Version: 02/0312015 Source: EPA Region 1 Number of Days to Update: 53 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact :0713112015 INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUSTS on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 02/03/2015 Source: EPA Region 10 Number of Days to Update: 29 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact :0712212015 INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land TC GR 5 Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUSTS on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2014 Source: EPA Region 4 Number of Days to Update: 10 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact :07/22/2015 INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal leaking storage tank lists Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 04/30/2015 Source: EPA, Region 5 Number of Days to Update: 24 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact :07/22/2015 INDIAN LUST R& Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUSTS on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 03/1712015 Source: EPA Region 6 Number of Days to Update: 52 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact :0712212015 INDIAN LUST R7; Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUSTS on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 03/30/2015 Source: EPA Region 7 Number of Days to Update: 55 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact :0712212015 INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 04/30/2015 Source: EPA Region 8 Number of Days to Update: 48 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact :0712212015 INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 01/08/2015 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Number of Days to Update: 32 Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact :0713112015 INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: 0.333 Mile Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Source: Environmental Protection Agency TC GR 6 Number of Days to Update: 52 Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact :05/0112015 INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal registered storage tank lists Search Distance: Property The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 02/03/2015 Source: EPA, Region 1 Number of Days to Update: 53 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact :0713112015 INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal registered storage tank lists The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 0510612015 Source: EPA Region 10 Number of Days to Update: 34 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact :0712212015 INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal registered storage tank lists The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 09/30/2014 Source: EPA Region 4 Number of Days to Update: 10 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact :07122/2015 INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal registered storage tank lists The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/30/2015 Source: EPA Region 5 Number of Days to Update: 27 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact :07122/2015 INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal registered storage tank lists The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 0311712015 Source: EPA Region 6 Number of Days to Update: 52 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact :0712212015 INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal registered storage tank lists The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). TC GR 7 Date of Government Version: 0912312014 Source; EPA Region 7 Number of Days to Update: 65 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact :07122/2015 INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal registered storage tank lists The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/30/2015 Source: EPA Region 8 Number of Days to Update: 48 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact :0712212015 INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal registered storage tank lists The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 12/1412014 Source: EPA Region 9 Number of Days to Update: 28 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact :0713112015 INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites Search Distance: 0.333 Mile A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 09/2912014 Source: EPA, Region 1 Number of Days to Update: 36 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact :06126/2015 INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Source: EPA, Region 7 Number of Days to Update: 27 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact :04/2012009 LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 11/25/2014 Number of Days to Update: 64 Last EDR Contact :07107/2015 LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931 and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust TC GR 8 Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Number of Days to Update: 36 Last EDR Contact :1210212009 LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information Standard Environmental Record Source: Federal CERCLIS Search Distance: Property Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 A Federal CERCLA ('Superfund') lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 02/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 37 Last EDR Contact :0 712 212 01 5 LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Standard Environmental Record Source: Federal institutional controls 1 engineering controls registries Search Distance: 0.333 Mile LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 05/28/2015 Source: Department of the Navy Number of Days to Update: 13 Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact :08/12/2015 MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 03/31/2015 Number of Days to Update: 63 Last EDR Contact :0610412015 NPL: National Priority List Standard Environmental Record Source: Federal NPL Search Distance: 0.333 Mile Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-416-7169 National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas, As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 03/2612015 Source: EPA Number of Days to Update: 75 Telephone: Not Reported Last EDR Contact :07/09/2015 NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-566-0690 TC GR 9 EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 EPA Region 2 Telephone: 212-637-4293 EPA Region 3 Telephone: 215-814-5418 EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8681 EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-353-1063 EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6118 EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-9474579 EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-5534479 NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Standard Environmental Record Source: Federal NPL Search Distance: Property Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Source: EPA Number of Days to Update: 56 Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact :08/1512011 ODI; Open Dump Inventory Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: 0.333 Mile An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Number of Days to Update: 39 Telephone: 800424-9346 Last EDR Contact :0610912004 PADS: PCB Activity Database System Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Source: EPA Number of Days to Update: 33 Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact :07/1712015 PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database TC GR 10 Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCIS registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2011 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Number of Days to Update: 83 Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact :07131/2015 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites Standard Environmental Record Source: Federal NPL Search Distance: 0.333 Mile A site that has been proposed for listing on the Nation alPriorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Regisler.EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments,and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet therequirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2015 Source: EPA Number of Days to Update: 75 Telephone: Not Reported Last EDR Contact :07/0912015 RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Source: EPA Number of Days to Update: 35 Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact :0610212008 RADINFO: Radiation Information Database Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. Date of Government Version: 04/07/2015 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Number of Days to Update: 63 Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact :07/0912015 RCRA NonGen I NLR: RCRA - Non Generators 1 No Longer Regulated Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Number of Days to Update: 72 Telephone: 703-308-8895 Last EDR Contact :0612612015 TC GR 11 RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators Standard Environmental Record Source: Federal RCRA generators list Search Distance: Property RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Number of Days to Update: 72 Telephone: 703-308-8895 Last EDR Contact :06/2612015 RCRA-LOG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators Standard Environmental Record Source: Federal RCRA generators list Search Distance: Property RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Number of Days to Update: 72 Telephone: 703-308-8895 Last EDR Contact :0612612015 RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators Standard Environmental Record Source: Federal RCRA generators list Search Distance: Property RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/1012016 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Number of Days to Update: 72 Telephone: 703-308-8895 Last EDR Contact :06/2612015 RCRA TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Standard Environmental Record Source: Federal RCRA TSD facilities list Search Distance: 0.333 Mile RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Number of Days to Update: 72 Telephone: 703-308-8895 Last EDR Contact :0612612015 ROD: Records Of Decision Standard Environmental Record Source: Federal NPL Search Distance: 0.333 Mile TC GR 12 Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 11/25/2013 Source: EPA Number of Days to Update: 74 Telephone: 703416-0223 Last EDR Contact :06112/2015 SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: 0.333 Mile The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 03/07/2011 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Number of Days to Update: 54 Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact :0512112015 SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Slat. 829) requires all registered pesticide -producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Source: EPA Number of Days to Update: 77 Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact :0712212015 TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313, Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Source: EPA Number of Days to Update: 110 Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact :0112912015 TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Source: EPA Number of Days to Update: 14 Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact :06/261201 5 UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: 0.333 Mile TC GR 13 Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand -like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version: 09/14/2010 Source: Department of Energy Number of Days to Update: 146 Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact :05126/2015 US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property The database is a sub -system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. Date of Government Version: 10/16/2014 Source: EPA Number of Days to Update: 17 Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact :0612212015 US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 1011612014 Source: EPA Number of Days to Update: 17 Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact :0 612 212 01 5 US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: 0.333 Mile Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version: 03/23/2015 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Number of Days to Update: 70 Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact :06/2412015 US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 02/25/2015 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Number of Days to Update: 15 Telephone: 202-307-1000 TC GR 14 Last EDR Contact :0512912015 US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List Standard Environmental Record Source: Federal institutional controls 1 engineering controls registries Search Distance: Property A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 03/16/2015 Number of Days to Update: 77 Last EDR Contact :0610112015 US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post -closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 03/09/2015 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Number of Days to Update: 15 Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact :08/12/2015 US KIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property A listing of clandestine drug lab locations, The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy, Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 0 212 512 0 15 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Number of Days to Update: 15 Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact :05129/2015 US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls Standard Environmental Record Source: Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries Search Distance: Property A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 03/1612015 Number of Days to Update: 77 Last EDR Contact :06/01/2015 US MINES: Mines Master Index File Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information, TC GR 15 Date of Government Version: 12/30/2014 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Number of Days to Update: 29 Telephone: 303-231-5959 Last EDR Contact :06/03/2015 AIRS: Permitted Airs Facility List Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property A listing of permitted Airs facilities. Date of Government Version: 06/11/2015 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Number of Days to Update: 19 Telephone: 804-698-4000 Last EDR Contact :0610112015 AST: Registered Petroleum Storage Tanks Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal registered storage tank lists Search Distance: Property Registered Aboveground Storage Tanks. Date of Government Version: 05/01/2015 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Number of Days to Update: 28 Telephone: 804-698-4010 Last EDR Contact :0610312015 BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Site Specific Assessments Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal Brownfields sites Search Distance: 0.333 Mile To qualify for Brownfields Assessment, the site must meet the Federal definition of a Brownfields and should have contaminant issues that need to be addressed and a redevelopment plan supported by the local government and community. Virginia's Department of Environmental Quality performs brownfields assessments under a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency at no cost to communities, property owners or, prospective purchasers. The assessment is an evaluation of environmental impacts caused by previous site uses similar to a Phase 11 Environmental Assessment. Date of Government Version: 07/28/2015 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Number of Days to Update: 26 Telephone: 804-698-4207 Last EDR Contact :0712812015 CEDS: Comprehensive Environmental Data System Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property Virginia Water Protection Permits, Virginia Pollution Discharge System (point discharge) permits and Virginia Pollution Abatement (no point discharge) permits. Date of Government Version: 06/08/2015 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Number of Days to Update: 22 Telephone: 804-698-4077 Last EDR Contact :06/0412015 COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: 0,333 Mile A listing of facilities with coal ash impoundments. Date of Government Version: 07/29/2009 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Number of Days to Update: 21 Telephone: 804-698-4285 TC GR 16 Last EDR Contact :0610412015 DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaner List Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: 0.25 Mile A listing of registered drycleaners. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Number of Days to Update: 1 Telephone: 804-698-4407 Last EDR Contact :07/13/2015 ENFORCEMENT: Enforcement Actions Data Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property A listing of enforcement actions. Date of Government Version: 06/16/2015 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Number of Days to Update: 19 Telephone: 804-698-4031 Last EDR Contact :0610412015 ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites Listing Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal institutional control 1 engineering control registries Search Distance: Property A listing of sites with Engineering Controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 06/23/2015 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Number of Days to Update: 5 Telephone: 804-698-4228 Last EDR Contact :09/2912015 Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 05/02/2015 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Number of Days to Update: 66 Telephone: 804-698-4205 Last EDR Contact :0810312015 Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information listing Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Solid waste financial assurance information. Date of Government Version: 05/02/2015 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Number of Days to Update: 25 Telephone: 804-698-4123 Last EDR Contact :08103/2015 INST CONTROL: Voluntary Remediation Program Database Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal institutional control 1 engineering control registries TC GR 17 Search Distance: Property Sites included in the Voluntary Remediation Program database that have deed restrictions. Date of Government Version: 06/23/2015 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Number of Days to Update: 5 Last EDR Contact :09129/2015 Telephone: 804-698-4228 LTANKS: Leaking Petroleum Storage Tanks Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal leaking storage tank lists Search Distance: 0.333 Mile Includes releases of petroleum from underground storage tanks and aboveground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 05/01/2015 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Number of Days to Update: 28 Last EDR Contact :06103/2015 Telephone: 804-698-4010 LUST REG NO: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Tracking Database Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal leaking storage tank lists Search Distance: 0.333 Mile Leaking underground storage tank site locations. Includes: counties of Arlington, Caroline, Culpeper, Fairfax, Fauquier, King George, Loudoun, Louisa, Madison, Orange, Prince William, Rappahannock, Spotsylvania, Stafford; cities of Alexandria, Fairfax, Falls Church, Fredericksburg, Manassas, Manassas Park. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2004 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Northern Regional Office Number of Days to Update: 48 Telephone: 703-583-3800 Last EDR Contact :0910612011 LUST REG PD: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal leaking storage tank lists Leaking underground storage tank site locaitons. Includes: counties of Amelia, Brunswick, Charles City, Chesterfield, Dinwiddie, Essex, Gloucester, GOOChland, Greensviile, Hanover, Henrico, King and Queen, King William, Lancaster, Mathews, Middlesex, New Kent, Northumberland, Powhatan, Prince George, Richmond, Surry, Sussex, Westmoreland; cities of Colonial Heights, Emporia, Hopewell, Petersburg. Date of Government Version: 12/02/2014 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Piedmont Regional Office Number of Days to Update: 43 Telephone: 804-527-5020 Last EDR Contact :06/0112015 LUST REG SC. Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal leaking storage tank lists Leaking underground storage tank site locations. Includes: counties of Amherst, Appomattox, Buckingham, Campbell, Charlotte, Cumberland, Halifax, Lunenburg, Mecklenburg, Nottoway, Piltsylvania, Prince Deward; cities of Danville, Lynchburg. Date of Government Version: 09/0612013 Source: Department of Environmental Quality, South Central Region Number of Days to Update: 11 Telephone: 434-582-5120 Last EDR Contact :0610112015 LUST REG SW: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal leaking storage tank lists Leaking underground storage tank site locations. Includes: counties of Bland, Buchanan, Carroll, Dickenson, Grayson, Lee, Russell, Scott, Smyth, Tazewell, Washington, Wise, Wythe; cities of Bristol, Galax, Norton. TC GR 18 Date of Government Version: 07/15/2013 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Southwest Regional Office Number of Days to Update: 60 Telephone: 276-676-4800 Last EDR Contact :0711312015 LUST REG TD: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal leaking storage lank lists Leaking underground storage tank site locations. Includes: counties of Accomack, Isle of Wight, James City, Northampton, Southampton, York; cities of Chesapeake, Franklin, Hampton, Newport News, Norfolk, Poquoson, Portsmouth, Suffolk, Virginia Beach, Williamsburg. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2013 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Tidewater Regional Office Number of Days to Update: 73 Telephone: trofoia@deq.vir Last EDR Contact :0612412015 LUST REG VA: Leaking Underground Storage Tank List Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal leaking storage tank lists Leaking underground storage tank site locations. Includes: counties of Albemarle, Augusta, Bath, Clarke, Fluvanna, Frederick, Greene, Highland, Nelson, Page, Rockbridge, Rockingham, Shenandoah, Warren; cities of Buena Vista, Charlottesville, Harrisonburg, Lexington, Staunton, Waynesboro, Winchester, Date of Government Version: 12106/2011 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Valley Regional Office Number of Days to Update: 39 Telephone: 540-574-7800 Last EDR Contact :06/01/2015 LUST REG WC. Leaking Underground Storage Tank List Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal leaking storage tank lists Leaking underground storage tank site locations. Includes: counties of Alleghany, Bedford, Botetourt, Craig, Floyd, Franklin, Giles, Henry, Montgomery, Patrick, Pulaski, Roanoke; cities of Bedford, Clifton Forge, Covington, Martinsville, Radford, Roanoke, Salem. Date of Government Version: 06/04/2015 Source: Department of Environmental Quality West Central Regional Office Number of Days to Update: 32 Telephone: 540-562-6700 Last EDR Contact :0610112015 SPILLS: Prep/Spills Database Listing Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property The Department of Environmental Quality's POLLUTION RESPONSE PROGRAM, known as PREP, provides for responses to air, water, and waste pollution incidents in order to protect human health and the environment. PREP staff often work to assist local emergency responders, other state agencies, federal agencies, and responsible parties, as may be needed, to manage pollution incidents. Oil spills, fish kills, and hazardous materials spills are examples of incidents that may involve the DEQ's PREP Program. Date of Government Version: 05/01/2015 Number of Days to Update: 28 Last EDR Contact :0610312015 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4287 SPILLS BRL: Prep/Spills Database Listing Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records A listing of spills locations located in the Blue Ridge Regional area, Lynchburg. Date of Government Version: 09/18/2009 Source: DEQ, Blue Ridge Regional Office Number of Days to Update: 18 Telephone: 434-582-6218 TC GR 19 Last EDR Contact :1112812011 SPILLS NO: PREP Database Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records The Department of Environmental Quality's POLLUTION RESPONSE PROGRAM, known as PREP, provides for responses to air, water, and waste pollution incidents in order to protect human health and the environment. Date of Government Version: 09/23/2009 Source: Department of Environmental Quality, Northern Region Number of Days to Update: 31 Telephone: 703-583-3864 Last EDR Contact :09106/2011 SPILLS PC: Pollution Complaint Database Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Pollution Complaints Database. The pollution reports contained in the PC database include the initial release reporting of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks and all other releases of petroleum to the environment as well as releases to state waters. The database is current through 1211193. Since that time, all spill and pollution reporting information has been collected and tracked through the DEQ regional offices. Date of Government Version: 06/01/1996 Number of Days to Update: 30 Last EDR Contact :03108/2010 SPILLS PD: PREP Database Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4287 Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records The Department of Environmental Quality's POLLUTION RESPONSE PROGRAM, known as PREP, provides for responses to air, water, and waste pollution incidents in order to protect human health and the environment. Date of Government Version: 1012012009 Source: Department of Environmental Quality, Piedmont Region Number of Days to Update: 35 Telephone: 804-527-5020 Last EDR Contact :02106/2012 SPILLS SW: Reportable Spills Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records The Department of Environmental Quality's POLLUTION RESPONSE PROGRAM, known as PREP, provides for responses to air, water, and waste pollution incidents in order to protect human health and the environment. Date of Government Version: 01/21/2010 Source: Department of Environmental Quality, Southwest Region Number of Days to Update: 25 Telephone: 276-676-4839 Last EDR Contact :07113/2012 SPILLS TD: PREP Database Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records The Department of Environmental Quality's POLLUTION RESPONSE PROGRAM, known as PREP, provides for responses to air, water, and waste pollution incidents in order to protect human health and the environment. Date of Government Version: 09/17/2009 Source: Department of Environmental Quality, Tidewater Region Number of Days to Update: 13 Telephone: trofoia@deq.vir Last EDR Contact :09/0612011 SPILLS VA: PREP Database Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records The Department of Environmental Quality's POLLUTION RESPONSE PROGRAM, known as PREP, provides for responses to air, water, and waste pollution incidents in order to protect human health and the environment. Date of Government Version: 08/08/2012 Source: Department of Environmental Quality, Valley Regional Office TC GR 20 Number of Days to Update: 57 Last EDR Contact :0510612013 Telephone: 540-574-7800 SPILLS WC: Prep Database Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records The Department of Environmental Quality's POLLUTION RESPONSE PROGRAM, known as PREP, provides for responses to air, water, and waste pollution incidents in order to protect human health and the environment. Date of Government Version: 09/21/2009 Source: Department of Environmental Quality, West Central Region Number of Days to Update: 31 Telephone: 540-562-6700 Last EDR Contact :0910 6/2 0 1 1 SWF/I_F: Solid Waste Management Facilities Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal landfill 1 solid waste disposal Search Distance: 0.333 Mile Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 04/17/2015 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Number of Days to Update: 4 Telephone: 804-698-4238 Last EDR Contact :06/04/2015 TIER 2: Tier 2 Information Listing Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property A listing of facilities which store or manufacture hazardous materials and submit a chemical inventory report. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Number of Days to Update: 60 Telephone: 804-698-4159 Last EDR Contact :08110/2015 UIC: Underground Injection Control Wells Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property A listing of underground injection controls wells. Date of Government Version: 08/04/2015 Source: Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy Number of Days to Update: 18 Telephone: 276A15-9700 Last EDR Contact :08106/2015 UST: Registered Petroleum Storage Tanks Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal registered storage tank lists Search Distance: Property Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST's are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available information varies by state program. Date of Government Version: 05/01/2015 Number of Days to Update: 28 Last EDR Contact :06/03/2015 VRP: Voluntary Remediation Program Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804698-4010 TC GR 21 Standard Environmental Record Source: State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites Search Distance: 0.333 Mile The Voluntary Cleanup Program encourages owners of elected contaminated sites to tape the initiative and conduct voluntary cleanups that meet state environmental standards. Date of Government Version: 06/23/2015 Source: Department of Environmental Quality Number of Days to Update: 5 Telephone: 804-698-4228 Last EDR Contact :0912912015 DOD: Department of Defense Sites Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: 0.333 Mile This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Source: USGS Number of Days to Update: 62 Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact :0711412015 INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Source: USGS Number of Days to Update: 34 Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact :07/14/2015 PWS: Public Water System Data Standard Environmental Record Source: Other Standard Environmental Records Search Distance: Property This Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) file contains public water systems name and address, population served and the primary source of water Date of Government Version: 12/17/2013 Source: EPA Number of Days to Update: 279 Telephone: Not Reported Last EDR Contact :06101/2015 TC GR 22 HISTORICAL USE RECORDS EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants Standard Environmental Record Source: Former manufactured Gas Plants Search Distance: 0.333 Mile The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR's researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: 08/28/2009 Source: EDR, Inc. Number of Days to Update: 55 Telephone: Not Reported Last EDR Contact :1113012012 EDR US Hist Auto Stat: EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations Standard Environmental Record Source: Historical Gas Stations Search Distance: 0.25 Mile EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: 02/20/2007 Source: EDR, Inc. Number of Days to Update: 42 Telephone: Not Reported Last EDR Contact :0212112007 EDR US Hist Cleaners: EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners Standard Environmental Record Source: Historical Dry Cleaners Search Distance: 0.25 Mile EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaningllaundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: 02/20/2007 Source: EDR, Inc. Number of Days to Update: 42 Telephone: Not Reported Last EDR Contact :0212112007 RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List Standard Environmental Record Source: Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives Search Distance: Property The EOR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environmental Quality in Virgina. Date of Government Version: Not Reported Source: Department of Environmental Quality Number of Days to Update: 203 Telephone: Not Reported Last EDR Contact :06!0112012 TC GR 23 RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank Standard Environmental Record Source: Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives Search Distance: Property The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists, Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environmental Quality in Virgina and at the Regional VA Levels. Date of Government Version: Not Reported Source: Department of Environmental Quality Number of Days to Update: 198 Telephone: Not Reported Last EDR Contact :0610112012 TC GR 24 TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model (DEMI) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5' minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000 -scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 1999 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100 -year and 500 -year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002 and 2005 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOW Information System Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW® Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services. The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map In a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Services, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION O 2006 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC GR 25 Appendix D Site Photographs Mead & Hunt, Inc. 174021600-155994.01 f, � a , d �ni� � _ �°to .f � •,I � ,�`�.- yII�* 'u I - r or 00 ° R r tx � t 1 vz r � _ „�, « ,� �� :. , •1112 4 I�2a014 ,, i-ATTOF Vsk W"Tr. , -lv 4i 4 441124 72+k' � IT2"", -� �� °tel � �'J��` ���� -•� .� �' :fir t t1�+4: •� a+ � %r> >� i t �,�SA�tr � a i �• �# � _�� S }� ,+� �� SI IIF,. f r r � M., •'� �p7 4 �'d �. � � -_ j YAW dq � v L—ff0Ii r . ��... �4ys ,. .- e . Qq .. �f � �..�%' s .�r`t}'fir•` . Appendix E iPaC Resources Packet VA DCR request VA DHR request (e -Form 620 submittal) Mead & Hunt, Inc. R4021600-155994.01 z II'nC Trust Resource Report US Fish & Wildlife Service I PaC Trust Resource Report Project Description NAME Rollins Road Tower PROJECT CODE ME3BQ-4QEZR—CGTCL-S5KXU—A3VXBM LOCATION Roanoke County, Virginia DESCRIPTION construction of a 195 -ft monopole within a 75 -ft x 75 -ft compound with new access road and utility easement. ME3BQ-4QEZR-CGTCL-S5KXU-A3VXBM U.S. Fish & Wildlife Contact Information Species in this report are managed by: Virginia Ecological Services Field Office 6669 Short Lane Gloucester, VA 23061-4410 (804) 693-6694 07/30/2095 01:03 IPaC Information for Planning and Conservation Page 2 IPaC Trust Resource Report Endangered Species ME3BQ-4QEZR-CGTCL-S5KXU-A3VXBM Proposed, candidate, threatened, and endangered species that are managed by the Endangered Species Program and should be considered as part of an effect analysis for this project. This unofficial species list is for informational purposes only and does not fulfill the requirements under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, which states that Federal agencies are required to "request of the Secretary of Interior information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed action." This requirement applies to projects which are conducted, permitted or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can be obtained by returning to this project on the IPaC website and requesting an Official Species List from the regulatory documents section. Fishes Roanoke Logperch Percina rex CRITICAL HABITAT No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https:l/ecos.fws.aov speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfale.action?spcode=EOI G Mammals Indiana Bat Myotis socialis CRITICAL HABITAT No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https•/lecos fws gov/sDeciesProfiile/profile/speciesProfile action?spcode=A000 Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis CRITICAL HABITAT No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https:Hecos,fws.gov/speciesProflle/profile/speciesProfile,action?spcode=AOJE Critical Habitats Endangered Endangered I fneatened Potential effects to critical habitat(s) within the project area must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves. There is no critical habitat within this project area 07/3012015 01:03 IPaC information for Planning and Conservation Page 3 IPaC Trust Resource Report ME3BQ-4QEZR-CGTCL-S5KXL1-A3VXBM Migratory Birds Birds are protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. Any activity which results in the take of migratory birds or eagles is prohibited unless authorized by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1). There are no provisions for allowing the take of migratory birds that are unintentionally killed or injured. You are responsible for complying with the appropriate regulations for the protection of birds as part of this project. This involves analyzing potential impacts and implementing appropriate conservation measures for all project activities. Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bird of conservation concern Year-round haps://ecos fws aov/speciesProfile! rop_ file/speciesProfile action?code=B008 Black -billed Cuckoo Coccyzus erythropthalmus Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding htt s://ecos,fws. ov/s eciesProfile/ rofile/s eciesProfile.action?s code=BOHI Blue -winged Warbler Vermivora pinus Season: Breeding Fox Sparrow Passerella iliaca Season: Wintering Golden -winged Warbler Vermivora chrysoptera Season: Breeding https•/lecos fws goov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=BOG4 Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus Season: Breeding Loggerhead Shrike Lanius ludovicianus Year-round https://ecos fws oov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile action?sncode=BOFY Louisiana Waterthrush Parkesia motacilla Season: Breeding Pled -billed Grebe Podilymbus podiceps Year-round Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Season: Breeding Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Year-round Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Season: Wintering Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Bird of conservation concern Bird of conservation concern Bird of conservation concern Bird of conservation concern Bird of conservation concern Bird of conservation concern Bird of conservation concern Bird of conservation concern Bird of conservation concern Bird of conservation concern Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding Worm Eating Warbler Helmitheros vermivorum Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding 07/30/2015 01:03 IPaC Information for Planning and Conservation Page 4 IPaC Trust Resource Report ME3BQ-4QEZR-CGTCL-S5KXU-A3VXBM Yellow -bellied Sapsucker sphyrapicus varies Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding Sps://ecos fws gov/speciesPro.file/profile/speciesProfile action?spcode=60FR 07/30/2015 01:03 IPaC Information for Planning and Conservation Page 5 IPaC Trust Resource Report ME3BQ-4()l ZR-CGTCL-S5KXU-A3VXBM Refuges Any activity proposed on National Wildlife Refuge lands must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. If your project overlaps or otherwise impacts a Refuge, please contact that Refuge to discuss the authorization process. There are no refuges within this project area 07/3012015 01:03 WaC Information for Planning and conservation Page 6 IPaC Trust Resource Report Wetlands ME3BQ-4QEZR-CGl CI :;,)KX[ J -A3VXI W1 Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats from your project may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal Statutes. Project proponents should discuss the relationship of these requirements to their project with the Regulatory Program of the appropriate U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District, DATA LIMITATIONS The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis. The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems. Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site. DATA EXCLUSIONS Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery. DATA PRECAUTIONS Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities. Wetland data is unavailable at this time. 07/30/2015 01:03 IPaC Information for Planning and Conservation Page 7 Copyright U DUR-Natural Heritage ---- YrOject i rtle: 4 D C R 2014 INFORMATION SERVICES ORDER FORM Mail or Email to: Project Review Coordinator Department of Conservation and Recreation Natural Heritage Program 600 E. Main St., 24th Floor Richmond, VA 23219 Voice: (804) 371-2708 Fax: (804) 371-2674 nhreview@dcr.virginia.gov ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SERVICES: Project Review (30 calendar day turnaround)..$90 per site; add $35 for 1-5 natural heritage occurrences (rare plants, rare animals, significant communities and karst) and $60 for 6 or more occurrences. Multi -quad project area $90 per quad. Project Review with Accompanying Map ... $250 per site; for projects with potential impact to Natural Heritage Resources including alternative energy projects, written comments with 8.5 X 11 map displaying Natural Heritage Screening Coverage. j Priority Service (5 business day turnaround).3500 surcharge Details: Describe project in the space below, please include detailed project description, project location information including latitude, longitude, acreage, and existing site conditions (photographs if available). Attach additional information as necessary. In order to ensure an accurate assessement, please submit an electronic copy of a site map (preferably from a USGS topo map with identified project boundaries) and all other information to nhreview@dcr.virginia.gov or fax a map to: Environmental Review Coordinator @(804) 371-2674. Please include the project title on all correspondence. Incomplete submittal of information will delay the review process. Project Number & Title: Hollins Road (VAROHRI) Tower Project Description: proposed construction of a 195 -foot monopole tower within a 75 -ft x 75 -ft fenced area. New access roar from Carlos Drive with utility easement will be constructed. Coordinates are 37-19-49.128N and 79-55-31.326W. wpyrigrrc v vt rc-ivacurac ncncage ---- rrojuct i mu: Page 2 -4w-DCRINFORMATION SERVICES ORDER FORM u '1 -w_%11- Natural Heritage Resource Reports & Distribution Maps DJ Custom NHR Maps (describe, call for more information)...............$80/hour i Custom NHR Reports (describe, call for more information) ............ $60/hour SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES: Hyperlink to an example of the license agreement Natural Heritage Data Explorer Subscription Service j (unlimited access per subscription year, complete a digital license agreement is required) ............. $1000/yr. Digital Conservation Sites Subscription Service (specify area of interest; complete a digital license agreement is required) j 1 county or 12 quads or less............................................................$1000/yr. j13-100 quads.................................................................................. $3500/yr. F] Statewide coverage..........................................................................$6000/yr. Please provide details in the space below: (failure to provide information will delay subscription processing) Conditions: 1. Digitized DCR natural heritage resource locational data for GIS or map production, whether provided by DCR digitally or entered by the client from tables or reports, may not be used without first completing a data licensing agreement with DCR Division of Natural Heritage. A license form is available on request. 2.Although DCR-DNH data are closely quality controlled, DCR-DNH makes no warranty as to the fitness of the data for any purpose. 3. Any publication of data provided by DCR, whether as text, table or map, must acknowledge Virginia DCR-Natural Heritage Program, and include the date the data were provided by DCR 4. If fees are assessed, an invoice will be included with the response. Please do not pre -pay. Payment is due within 30 days of receipt. Minimum charge for hourly fees is $40. I understand and agree to the above conditions: E-1 Yes (Required for Fee Services) t.opyrignL v vun-naiurai nuttage ---- rroject r Sue: Page 3 4 ddo— INFORMATION SERVICES ORDER FORMW"'DCR 2014,'j',% INFORMATION SERVICES ORDER FORM DCR maintains lists of natural heritage resources monitored by the Natural Heritage Program. These lists provide information on taxonomy, rarity and federal/state legal statuses. These reports are not site specific and are NOT to be substituted for a project review or for on-site surveys required for environmental assessments of specific project areas. Due to staff and budget constraints we ask that you use the online service whenever possible to download these lists of natural heritage resources: Hyperlink to on-line reports ( these may change as they are updated by inventory staff) The Natural Communities of Virginia J Natural Heritage Resources of Virginia: Rare Animals (PDF) J Natural Heritage Resources of Virginia: Rare Plants (PDF) County lists of natural heritage resources can be generated using the Natural Heritage Data Explorer: Or requested below : no results were noted on Data Explorer site. Send data and invoice (if applicable) to: (Please be sure to include a phone number and e-mail so we may contact you if we have any questions regarding your data needs) Name: Teresa Schuller Company: Mead & Hunt, Inc. Address: 400 Tracy Way, Suite 200 City: Charleston State/Zip: WV 25311 Taxpayer ID #: 3 g- 0 7 9 3 8 2 2Fax: 304-345-6714 Phone: 681-313-4617 Ext: Email: teresa.schuller@meadh unt.com V;4 NI tr r/fYI��+�p ,q+'1 ,{ r e[ �FP� �r � �. rr.�.. rP (� 4 •rlfl I�' Itll `9 � �..ee ll,• 1� rJ ►! t � it .lY. � P,k'r �If GIYI 1 I I el Vie •R ! qp I i 4 I �• �r ' 61 r' r Ivy ,• jk ter" f �el�r r� r �: M T r r `. %�� _ 1 1 • ••I r. 1 �` i,�5. r I • ''k4 k I .gyp •^ r e t P �. ��k iy 1 j1 I •. I ' � �'ie, ' � i YII � '- YI`I "°tis, � ■ I, (� ' �rI 1d •J' I J '-. � 'I III I I � ! VI '� _ j .���• �� � a� � *.• u ' iICiS'09, �, ■�,�_- �.i it }I. J y Jn I t I , I L f.Y." x' �. .' t •1• A I II� F� r� Ff 1, rt." ,.y f 1ggTu � : ; i' I it f f I + eu+ ���� ,, r5, `r+'� P • 't'+ r , •rhe + .�II 'i. r I, y. � r II I 1 '■ y`, I •.' 1� 1 Y. 1 ,YI �,,r �h X11 ■ �'�"k*i I t � � .'•r . ��i ' , i� .'" to ! , tl `� tt! .Ip'k �r 1 • + ((, Y: 1' ILP• � � k �� -1• � r 1 � P I i I1r; Declination r sl Id's i ■ ' ■ I° " + •�� , t Yf � ee� '■ � • J � F ■ it � # i , + I •r r, + r '+ Id ■ r' tiff ' � •+�•'�„ •k r ■ r ■ � ` 't t � � � i ■ r Id � � ■ rl ■ � +t � I i 4 ! MN 8.51 ° W ,I', # t • { i •• t .'" $q ht ' 200 o 290$'10'1,5 . mTom Map Name: ROANOKE Scale: 1 inch = 666 ft. Date Published: 1963 State Name: VA Horizontal Datum: NAD83 Print Date: 07/30/15 Date Photo Revised: 1984 Teresa Schuller From: towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 1:47 PM To: Teresa Schuller Subject: Section 106 New Filing Submitted- Email ID #1325412 The following new Section 106 filing has been submitted: File Number: 0006895738 TCNS Number: 129587 Purpose: New Tower Submission Packet Notification Date: 7AM EST 07/31/2015 Applicant: Apex Towers, LLC Consultant: Mead & Hunt, Inc. Positive Train Control Filing Subject to Expedited Treatment Under Program Comment: No Site Name: Hollins Road (VAROHRI) Site Address: Hollins Road Detailed Description of Project: Proposed construction of a 199 -ft (including 4 -ft lightning rod) monopole tower and equipment shelter within a 100 -ft by 100 -ft. leased area. Access road and utility corridor will be constructed. Site Coordinates: 37-19-44.9 N, 79-55-32.5 W City: Roanoke County: ROANOKE State: VA Lead SHPO/THPO: Virginia Department of Historic Resources Consultant Contact Information: Name: Mead & Hunt, Inc. Title: PO Box: Address: 400 Tracy Way Suite 200 City: Charleston State: WV Zip: 25311 Phone: 681-313-4617 Fax: Email: teresa.scbuller@meadhunt.com NOTICE OF FRAUDULENT USE OF SYSTEM, ABUSE OF PASSWORD AND RELATED MISUSE Use of the Section 106 system is intended to facilitate consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable laws. Any person having access to Section 106 information shall use it only for its intended purpose. Appropriate action will be taken with respect to any misuse of the system. Appendix F Environmental Professional Qualifications Mead & Hunt, Inc. 84021600-155994.01 TERESA SCHULLER, LRS ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT MANSFIN' Teresa Schuller brings 33 years of experience in environmental research as well as state and consulting experience. As an analytical chemist, her research included organic and inorganic compounds' fate and degradation in soil, surface water, sediment and ground water. Teresa served as project management of multi -faceted domestic and international mergers and acquisition projects. She managed manual preparation (pollution, prevention and control (PPC); spill, prevention, control and countermeasure (SPCC); spill response, ground water protection plan, etc.). Teresa conducted environmental and Occupational Safety and Health Administration training. She also managed more than 2,500 telecommunications tower siting projects (Phase I ESAs, NEPA compliance, and EAs where needed) in West Virginia, Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia. Teresa prepared Regulation 13 air applications for various industries and Title V applications for landfill as well as tier II and III air submission for industries. She managed and prepared U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USCOE) permits for a variety of projects and assisted concrete and timber industries with storm water permitting and discharge monitoring report compliance. She was project manager for various general civil engineering projects and construction management projects. In addition, Teresa was responsible for permitting and construction management of housing authority redevelopment projects and an energy sector -compressor station. She possesses 14 years of experience in applicable risk assessment work conducting and managing over 100 various types of risk assessments for industry and Potentially Responsible Parties (PRP) committees. Teresa managed, prepared and defended Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and Resource and Conservation Recovery Act (RCRA) risk assessments. RELATED PROJECTS State of West Virginia Executive Office BTOP Broadband Grant #2672 NEPA, EA, FONSI West Virginia Teresa managed the environmental work for the State of West Virginia Broadband grant from the NTIA. The grant amount is $126 million to provide 17 new telecommunication towers to the Homeland Security Network (microwave) and approximately 600 miles of fiber to add broadband service to 1,064 anchor tenants (schools, hospitals, libraries, etc.). The work involved the preparation of an EA for the project with specialized negotiations with USFWS, WVDNR, National Forest Agency, SHPO, THPOs (Native American tribes), COE, and WVDEP to obtain clearance letters. The work began in March 2010 with the FONSI issued in February 2011. Teresa will also be responsible for approving fiber construction; tower construction; inspections of towers for E&SC measures; inspections of USFWS and WVDNR RTE species on fiber builds; modifications of the EA for project changes; and coordination with the State of West Virginia's project manager from 2010-2013. Maintenance of files and documents for federal audits are required. Telecommunications tower siting Various National and Regional Carriers West Virginia, Virginia, Ohio, Kentucky, Maryland, Pennsylvania Teresa managed more than 2,500 telecommunications tower siting projects. Tasks 65-15-13 Areas of Expertise ■ Project management ■ Telecommunication towers ■ NEPA and Phase I ESAs ■ EAs and FONSIs ■ COE and state permitting ■ Phase I and II ESAs ■ Storm water permitting ■ Air permitting ■ Risk assessment Education MS, Chemistry, West Chester University, 1983 BS, Chemistry, Eastern Illinois University, 1979 Registration ■ Licensed Remediation Specialist, West Virginia (LRS 174, 2004) Credentials ■ Continued education in specialized training and management courses ■ OSHA 40 hour certification (HAZWOPER), ■ Project management training courses, including PSMJ ■ ODOTs Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Course 2010 Past Employment ■ TERRADON Corp. 1999-2009 ■ ERM, Inc. 1986-1998 ■ E.I. DuPont 1983-1986 ■ Illinois State Natural History Survey 1979-1981 No. of Years With Mead & Hunt ■ February 2009 to present No. of Years With Other Firms ■ 30 Mead] lunt TERESA SCHULLER, LRS (CONTINUED) included Phase I ESAs, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Checklists, NEPA, State Historic Preservation Offices, Tribal Historic Preservation Officers, USFWS and State Department of Natural Resources Clearance, Environmental Assessments (EAs) for FONSIs, and Federal Communications Commission's clearances. The EAs followed a modified US ACOE report structure. EAIFONSI for Mt Storm Tower WVDHHR Grant County, West Virginia Teresa managed and prepared an EA for a proposed 480 -foot guyed tower to address migratory bird issues. Coordination with the State Ornithologist was necessary to evaluate potential bird kills. Following federal and local 30 -day notices, FCC granted a FONSI to allow construction of the tower provided a modified lighting system was utilized. EA for Weston Tower WVDHHR Lewis County, West Virginia Teresa prepared an EA for a critical site for the WV Emergency Medical Services (including state police, fire department, and 911 communications) as a major link between Lewis County responders and the rest of the WV EMS state-wide microwave system. The existing tower was insufficient to link to the remaining state network . unless the height was increased, which would adversely impact NRHP sites and historic county sites. The EA included a memorandum of agreement between the Lewis County Commission and SHPO. A FONSI was issued by FCC following a stringent review by SHPO, FCC, and Advisory Council for Historic Places. FEMA EAIFONSI for Four Towers WV Division of Homeland Security Various Counties, West Virginia Teresa managed and prepared a FEMA EAs for four proposed towers to meet FEMA grant funding requirements. Following federal and local 30 -day notices, FEMA granted FONSIs to allow construction of the towers. Parking tract Steptoe & Johnson, PLLC Fayette County, West Virginia Teresa managed the parking tracts project for the Boy Scout project. The work involved survey crews, archaeology surveys, and wetland delineations. Identified critical areas or habitats were avoided during the upgrade of the existing roadways and construction of parking lots. Future work may require submission of the cultural resource report and wetland delineation to obtain permitting for other land uses. Glen Jean Entrance Arrow WV Fayette County, West Virginia Teresa coordinated the archaeology and cultural resources work, along with wetland review and impacts for the design of a new road alignment in Glen Jean. These efforts supported WVDOH in their completion of a Categorical Exclusion from the ACOE for the construction project. TERESA SCHULLER, L. (CONTINUED) Voluntary Remediation Site (VRP) Confidential Client Kanawha County, West Virginia Teresa assisted a manufacturing company who was purchasing a WV VRP site for their relocation. A Phase I ESA, Phase li ESA with soil, groundwater, asbestos and PCB samples and analysis were conducted on an expedited schedule. Teresa worked with the State of West Virginia VRP group and the Seller's consultant to negotiate the purchase of the property. Teresa managed multidisciplinary team of scientists and engineers who designed the new buildings, parking areas, construction oversight (contaminated soil areas), and health and safety issues for the construction. She also obtained storm water permits and a Regulation 13 air permit for the manufacturing operation. Teresa was part of the company's team that accepted WVDEP's "Environmental Excellence Award for Land Use" in 2010. She continues to assist the company with their environmental needs. Environmental site assessment (ESA) Charter Associates, Inc. West Virginia Teresa managed Phase I ESAs for the purchase of 250- and 280 -acre tracts of land in southern West Virginia. Environmental site assessment (ESA) Cranberry Hardwoods, Inc. Fayette County, West Virginia Teresa managed Phases I and II ESAs for an 11,000 -acre parcel and an 11 -acre sawmill property as part of the purchase for the Boy Scouts of America project. She provided management of the field team, laboratory, driller and asbestos subcontractors. Teresa also provided oversight for soil remediation activities at this property. Cease and desist orders for Stream Impacts Confidential client Cross Lanes, West Virginia Teresa assisted a private citizen with cease and desist orders from the West Virginia Division of Environmental Protection (WVDEP) and USCOE related to filling in a stream. The project involved oversight of Erosion and Sediment (ES&C) plans and a survey team, as well as coordination with WVDEP and USCOE personnel. Environmental site assessment (ESA) Charleston — Kanawha County Public Housing and Cabell County Housing Authority Charleston and Huntington, West Virginia Teresa conducted a multi -site Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Phase I ESA leading to a FONSI for Charleston Public Housing. The Phase I ESAs were completed in conformance with the scope and limitations of the Veteran Affairs - Environmental Compliance Method and American Society for Testing and Materials Standard E1527-05. She conducted an environmental evaluation and Phase I site assessment of a former school for the proposed Douglass Center retirement housing renovation project. The project was funded in part by HUD and involved analytical sampling for lead paint and asbestos throughout the three-story building. The analytical data and remediation TERESA SGHULLER, LRS (CONTINUED) recommendations were presented to the client in a report. Site assessments Fortune 50 companies, banks, developers International, National and State Levels Teresa served as manager and senior auditor for more than 2,500 property transfer/due diligence site assessments. Clients included major telecommunications companies, banks, public companies and industry. Environmental site assessment (ESA) Huntington Housing Authority Huntington, West Virginia Teresa provided an environmental evaluation and Phase I site assessment of the former Westmoreland School In Huntington, West Virginia. She conducted analytical sampling for asbestos and provided recommendations for remediation for what is now the Huntington Senior Center. This project was funded in part by HUD. Wetland permitting Various West Virginia Teresa managed wetland permitting (COE, WVDEP and WVDNR) and mitigation aspects of various size projects for commercial and residential developers. She also provides oversight for wetland specialists and archaeologists performing the field work. 0 Mail Processing Center Federal Aviation Administration Southwest Regional Office Obstruction Evaluation Group 2601 Meacham Boulevard Fort Worth, TX 76193 Issued Date: 06/16/2015 David McClure Apex Towers, LLC 125 Whitestick Road 125 BECKLEY, WV 25801 Aeronautical Study No. 2015 -AEA -3048 -OE ** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION ** The Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C., Section 44718 and if applicable Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 77, concerning: Structure: Monopole Hollins Road #2 Location: Roanoke, VA Latitude: 37-19-44.90N NAD 83 Longitude: 79-55-32.48W Heights: 1042 feet site elevation (SE) 154 feet above ground level (AGL) 1196 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) This aeronautical study revealed that the structure does not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s), if any, is(are) met: It is required that FAA Form 7460-2, Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, be e -filed any time the project is abandoned or: At least 10 days prior to start of construction (7460-2, Part 1) X Within 5 days after the construction reaches its greatest height (7460-2, Part 2) Based on this evaluation, marking and lighting are not necessary for aviation safety. However, if marking/ lighting are accomplished on a voluntary basis, we recommend it be installed and maintained in accordance with FAA Advisory circular 70/7460-1 K Change 2. This determination expires on 12/16/2016 unless: (a) the construction is started (not necessarily completed) and FAA Form 7460-2, Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, is received by this office. (b) extended, revised, or terminated by the issuing office. (c) the construction is subject to the licensing authority of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and an application for a construction permit has been filed, as required by the FCC, within 6 months of the date of this determination. In such case, the determination expires on the date prescribed by the FCC for completion of construction, or the date the FCC denies the application. Page 1 of 3 NOTE: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THIS DETERMINATION MUST BEE -FILED AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE. AFTER RE-EVALUATION OF CURRENT OPERATIONS IN THE AREA OF THE STRUCTURE TO DETERMINE THAT NO SIGNIFICANT AERONAUTICAL CHANGES HAVE OCCURRED, YOUR DETERMINATION MAY BE ELIGIBLE FOR ONE EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD. This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates , heights, frequency(ies) and power. Any changes in coordinates, heights, and frequencies or use of greater power will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration , including increase to heights, power, or the addition of other transmitters, requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derricks, etc., which may be used during actual construction of the structure. However, this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, State, or local government body. Any failure or malfunction that lasts more than thirty (30) minutes and affects a top light or flashing obstruction light, regardless of its position, should be reported immediately to (877) 487-6867 so a Notice to Ail -men (NOTAM) can be issued. As soon as the normal operation is restored, notify the same number. A copy of this determination will be forwarded to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) because the structure is subject to their licensing authority. If we can be of further assistance, please contact our office at (817) 321-7755. On any future correspondence concerning this matter, please refer to Aeronautical Study Number 2015 -AEA -3048 -OE, Signature Control No: 253939029-255329143 Debbie Cardenas Technician Attachment(s) Frequency Data cc: FCC Page 2 of 3 (DNE) Frequency Data for ASN 2015 -AEA -3048 -OE LOW HIGH FREQUENCY ERP FREQUENCY FREQUENCY UNIT ERP UNIT 698 806 MHz 1000 W 806 824 MHz 500 W 824 849 MHz 500 W 851 866 MHz 500 W 869 894 MHz 500 W 896 901 MHz 500 W 901 902 MHz 7 W 930 931 MHz 3500 W 931 932 MHz 3500 W 932 932.5 MHz 17 dBW 935 940 MHz 1000 W 940 941 MHz 3500 W 1850 1910 MHz 1640 W 1930 1990 MHz 1640 W 2305 2310 MHz 2000 W 2345 2360 MHz 2000 W Page 3 of 3 �0M UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Y� ANTENNA srRucruRE REGISTRATION OWNER: APEX TOWERS, LLC FCC Registration Number (FRN): 0024458069 ��oMMuyr 2 This registration is effective upon completion of the described antenna structure and notification to the Commission. YOU MUST NOTIFY THE COMMISSION WITHIN 24 HOURS OF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION OR CANCELLATION OF YOUR PROJECT, please file FCC Form 854. To file electronically, connect to the antenna structure registration system by pointing your web browser to http://wii-eless.fcc.gov/antenna. Electronic filing is recommended. You may also file manually by submitting a paper copy of FCC Form 854. Use purpose code "NT" for notification of completion of construction; use purpose code "CA" to cancel your registration. The Antenna Structure Registration is not an authorization to construct radio facilities or transmit radio signals. It is necessary that ail radio equipment on this structure be covered by a valid FCC license or construction permit. You must immediately provide a copy of this Registration to all tenant licensees and permittees sited on the structure described on this Registration (although not required, you may want to use Certified Mail to obtain proof of receipt), and display your Registration Number at the site. See reverse for important information about the Commission's Antenna Structure Registration rules. FCC 8548 Page i of 2 June 2012 Antenna Structure Registration Number ATTN: DAVID MCCLURE APEX TOWERS, LLC 1297643 125 WHITESTICK ROAD BECKLEY, WV 25801 Issue Date 11-30-2015 Location of Antenna Structure Ground Elevation (AMSL) 5119 Hollins Road 317.6 meters Roanoke, VA Overall Height Above Ground (AGL) County: ROANOKE 46.9 meters Latitude Longitude Overall Height Above Mean Sea Level (AMSL) 37-19-44.9 N 079-55-32.5 W NAD83 364.5 meters Center of Array Coordinates Type of Structure NIA MTOWER Monopole Painting and bighting Requirements: NONE Conditions: This registration is effective upon completion of the described antenna structure and notification to the Commission. YOU MUST NOTIFY THE COMMISSION WITHIN 24 HOURS OF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION OR CANCELLATION OF YOUR PROJECT, please file FCC Form 854. To file electronically, connect to the antenna structure registration system by pointing your web browser to http://wii-eless.fcc.gov/antenna. Electronic filing is recommended. You may also file manually by submitting a paper copy of FCC Form 854. Use purpose code "NT" for notification of completion of construction; use purpose code "CA" to cancel your registration. The Antenna Structure Registration is not an authorization to construct radio facilities or transmit radio signals. It is necessary that ail radio equipment on this structure be covered by a valid FCC license or construction permit. You must immediately provide a copy of this Registration to all tenant licensees and permittees sited on the structure described on this Registration (although not required, you may want to use Certified Mail to obtain proof of receipt), and display your Registration Number at the site. See reverse for important information about the Commission's Antenna Structure Registration rules. FCC 8548 Page i of 2 June 2012 +J 2 M c O 0 x w NJ p w G o w � o w e � 0 u S/5 � u o rTi T u _ Q n`g C W w �v�4ciF o p,n tn cD vi u¢ F otw o ro rn °=t°y O� O O O° qr'j y .moi N w � u T. ti � •F7 13 ca•a� 2 ��L���w0 �' � � ° a ° � o� o t ¢ a Zh- � ^a ro ro v� � C ,may; � '7 yfl�.+ � � a+ R A ° v� •0 � O � d [ O' H j"j'� �iq U 6 -dq N •-w• > V O Edi ° G �t �S uBtC 3 q a >a �Qp4 c c .�° �'EQ�U s WW Z U a. �, yr to per., c a R. CY •° roy 5 W o pp pap q? 40 0 Qw% ,o y o o ,°, �'a ❑"v p U oa4 z nom, °op d o A W W >Z zA".]� , b�zC FzZ 4. W ZZ a � � b L IN U pO�j p ty O O W to •«. C cn � y w° 04 o o VJ U j F E _ v V'oot al 4d R n 'rf LC w w •tea G b V az"'2 > > z u`uu�' 0 un k d ° 'I ,u u O ip Z C '� y w m •� w 3 3 W 3 -O ro u aiG4 oAQ .6n roi �a u .0. Z F +� V •`�.. 'C 'C S 'H Z w a+ 17 p v�vsUU U 0 rs I-i3w¢ +J 2 M O w NJ o � o w e � u S/5 rTi T u � RC •� Q n`g C W w �v�4ciF I rr4r3 �'r�j f� -cc �' r 1 1f= .. CT 1 { + ., `ricr, A rf Ar ' o,0037 Nk N='�11rY t .M cliff' ,� �� � r - T t �'?', �� � I' � + ;'• � � ^. �' Qp1 1f141. 4 r; 1`�r J - ii74ti y , 1t,' +•w` � '�i�. }l� `j �� 1 r % '+� 't ��', �� .�- / :�. � 605.- • ii �.a � �a! tr• r �I� '! � � '. � tr .r� 1, ���. JIulllns��s •'� �'• V 'i{h, ' C �� of l • 'fL�:4 � t. � Ftu he'ir�tu � � ,� � a r `.. ��+, \ ' 1Snrn {u•tvlrSr ` 1 I IN r ' ToL o, kstorle � { Lj l •. � l CeCI , ti t !r �I'�r •e ,rf \1e •rsi•ial ��`, �� I ./rJ 4 ,'0.50 Miles •�l� 4. ..L.: .! 4�! �'r �Y��i-fS 1 � `� ] ,. ( r. (`{jlil �/I rr r A �i _��� � � �'. �� �r ��.� o. A�7rurll:rin Vr - � t \.� r�. � :y .��,� \S�� if' 4,�� �,-,'• r �ai;�,�yr. $ rvgp fr i� ��r rig•, .( �,� f• Irk �jf% �,,r rl + � ��• � `` 4 � {`+'r VVI j .,., ��\ /��' •'I 1 • Yr f � �� `114 `r 4/- �J� � r �� � '�I,�. �. `, • \ ` I� I ! t r y ri t• ! it /� j (f j ,{, 1 � i .. - . r• 1 r� II � 14 »•X `i �r� ,. _. �,, r ` � • `2� I � * �-a '� a�. o �E •,� � I � t e i',r • ff���� �' f� ,1 � � Off/ � i�i .t � !t J 'i-' '� � ) ��•�. . I .'fu ,., �,.. `. '�ic�l• �—` 'r T'�%�` � �r�Jl. �'• 1 r , r �11in 'l� •I'� `CJ 4.1� I ` i, �i.{�. ,! J�P \ `1. \V rl � 4 Y 4,\�` '<�� /i n' ' �\ - � � _. � ' , I� yr ��r. 1 ,,rte � -p 3 � ��,� I� l✓`�'' �(7�`,fr .. 1!� �,tt' .., 6Pi r r �. j-• ( r � y` ��•-. r _. t �i� �f. r (.,.� �� , � ��r((( , i���"'w, �...• ` • I J � .t � r11F�� 't ��� � 73�871�� _�� - .-��� i1 ri �. \,/ R �►', Y{iful�f�r —1 Slti - L`~' I �tr �`{a 1rb\\\` t:`` ortsrll> hl }.ki ,fel �y is — t `.' I ' - � 1 ���J � -. •` i �� i f' �i) I A .�%"� 1 E�"�� K-'r � -i tlr f/. �• t .. i '•�� �(f/ y1: /� J4(j'�',�. .sem' fr `'Gr r �) /�.1� I 1 i' `� i11� ,.. I .l'� i ••�'_ r=i i ��\ f \_/ ,: • D 1�-,�ry �-! Avg' � / � r r • i' � `}�\'f , �" —?y�,• yyy}'' r ' .[r • •1 �'( � � ' r r '` r � (r e y ' ��! r , r ' � ; /! 7 / /� i � ,,1�x - '�.� �.)' �,� � •+r : • Ila rrhfuu I"it, 11 _ t t• •, 1�+ r - r +j/}r\ i,- c If�t�I /IIS! Declination AVE r 01 04 r{etittnc AVE s— 4. yTurt� ° r (ivIf XI rA r+ y,;' ' / � : 1 Ilnlfrir. ctrl y/ rulF Cf � �✓ // �J � �lGorC.200 Oft qPb `- 281°W 200D-D1r 5 0 �1 Map Name: ROANOKE Scale: 1 inch =2,000 ft. Date Published: 1963 State Name: VA Horizontal Datum: NAD83 Print Date: 07/15/15 Date Photo Revised: 1984 u 4 M00 E; 1iW� m X Z p rc 0 Q af Zcli� (no M z _j o W VI j in En U W D 32 C7 a �' o Y N Luow W Z O F- tnjP F U 0 mZ II w W o o Z If) ±(, 04 ai to �:; m ''' W a a o ¢ © ¢ W-, m z z ¢ o a o a to F) in n- m a Ill J >wLl� W 00U.��Qp �aa N o0o¢ ;;l < Z-1oM2 ¢ ILINM W �zIll ZN� Z:5 oN-2p� -1 0 6 w n a. IIx 0W -zaZU�M LLa Q0 bmf>�°m ¢onW�i z00 11j w�0- �o�a Ill w 0� Ix ¢¢ 0 3: 0 WWzIrOUENDo eco —zz WNa ¢ � 2m U m , Q aWa _jF-LUQz0-0 u3laLt LL, VF^©U°` G�EyOupi�ZCl MR fflW¢��i ac-F...mr� W qO 0wnaw� jo-j It uOf-6I--¢-joU. o IEB CIVNi 3NOZ MnOS VA U) } Lj l- O Ow cn wza luz f= 2 WU)w0W Lifw a J =� ,,•zmrnz E W o a w w F- 0 2 � �"n Z �lnQ�a�V3F m ¢ VwLLama W0�C7 o Ill o] m� �UUr pp,,azC} FMIWI LF��e ,CD z zC)MI Nam�tnmz ml WLL0=l1mw�Iaaw DaW0¢I°u�az°0L" zQ�amaozpw 4O I_ gzwzn,nmO<mw 5O km—w¢wzow-m�w m-jw U=5�Wzw �0Zs F -Z Z < W � F =0: LLP 0 0 Z m 0 zo�Ozd�� F-Owui OLL�zj��UoaozZQ aw <i:�W ozpin -p—.0 2LLOMF- OW:O���cVw y w O 0 000>1 -DO- 00 =zwQ'- mzu�omin c9C9y5""w[7 wpm v� zwQZ F--ZWWN WC'J— U} ZO KWLL j UZw WGCOp!"�(97af0:r ��Um�mpOzrwzm 062a 0LL; W,wF0w16 Uu¢lazdMZO—M�z�F-a vla a z W W � 0 0 U Z W W a o a � w W O Ir N S V) w o r � x u) Z F- �Jfn} W Z LULU ¢WZW LL Ii¢u�.a ig00>00 L YaILI Ill in (D W UUf¢J) Z�Z wo wLL0 le w0mo WFOOc¢mwwg m. 000t-N40Wz --A wz�- 0 OW I-• wW of 02� 0: =pazVAow ��rawawcalia W�B.m0UU aQclw¢w�w two_Jo(nN� ag a��10 Z z 81 a� LO 0 a a U-1 N N woJaz w8m�F-F-W W N Z W W O p¢QW DZ� il0z w0: � WELOmJm�W R-,zA0 d' o co O� co o)= N S a � co ¢z V �� `Q 00 uJ a w ¢LLm Zt9 L O Z L o�a�zzwr¢a¢am w r a zw� aw�Oz ° UWj(DQLUW;Na o awmFFLLM�LL m WMOZ) .-OaLCO z z0O(nNi W a5(0z0 W Wz ¢(7r z on -Lu w z W W Z O L Q P wS Q U O z m W (1wt-ucj w Z mz-lzll�wp z¢u,-Z=&iF Fa z �' 00 oZaOrwn •-°'�t2 v 6m�om�` wn50L WZ60 TOQ•lQO.T sr m...l W QQr¢H co zu..ak �D 10¢aon► � Q¢z�`oN zQ> u�lugl °RzMO©�ogwg� oa ILL 00aZwpaLL. LL WF-ONW<XgM..tQQ00 LL M Ou� �ryc?¢v-j¢�erntiLuDF-Va UOM��ZZ LL U LL co) Lu to OZ; ~FQ-j L) C7LLI 0 wmoo~ z ¢ ' NO�LIWOZ 0 97 y . �.... ZZZ \� ,..I ill Z6 f r LU L ,❑_ ^y ua�r aN co N CO _.LZsa 9-1 0 m=a a r« _.ra \ƒ §A � � t� !2 )CL \0 \ f9}] k $ & § Ri E \ ] / / k 19 �$ k / e Bf \2 § §p zQ m2 m 16 .0 LM E ar ro G ro 0 a C 0 0 K 0: W o U N m •c O c = ro o C a rra�s O C C) .o o S C 0 0 O Z O O LL Z CL Z W W J a W C � N O N N C U C01 U a0 3 = U co W m N •Q t0 N w a m N co _ 0 N E N 06 47 a M v E 0 c J-- O C 3 y o - N O C v�oaCi A Y 'M N E0 m l m E Et 0 -0 N T] _ t O C 0 € V c 0 C )0E E m s u N w Ea to I I ti r °i 0 = O N �-• N m (6 N G 2 U o � L U m a C m CL o O I roe1 n .N 0 in E +o 16 o L 0 N r- O q) U d) o �c!y haw U (j I L El CL Co 7 Q. y aow N E U, W V m m m 0 cr � ci O U N o m a) M O M a 4) Cp N U) N '' a ro d ro -t c U m U) al C� 0 a m �``-ova U m wte=a ° amro Eo m o 0 d E m E O U))m.a+£ _ n 0 cu a C J o GO :) ID o ro y W ZEE N Q C ya - .y fL' 2 mN �: U 2! t Im m aL. C r O. A `7 N L m ro : N N nS ro C O °,ga=r co 3 r m N 0 E rri m E ro0C 10 =o y�_N � m� N roin c -0 �; U w ro v) N C oo G. �nE at U1 N p O O N N j — m 0 a) n. E p Q> u) m 2 a'v¢ 0 N I -Y U)cntn I I ti r (Ji G N � N 3Gg N G 2 s o c L N 0 a > 0O .0 4) N N 'IUD m m I o t � �E�+ o L 0 N U i) D N C .� y 0 Z eq o w 5 (a N 0 Q o rolEi N' O. N IL o E ro m I L El m LL 00 8 13 SL a`r aow N O C N I � O N O m o u OO O •� r e W I m 0 a i� C_�� ° amro yr d E m E O D N H U .!= O LO It 0 0 N N co 0 a N Z ro Z m m N 7 1� � � 0 c U m a 'IUD m m N 0 m ° o t m o a U i) D N C .� y 0 Z eq o w 5 rn D Ts J Q m L El m LL 00 8 13 SL u m y r}y O C Q C G V OC O D a m v v o ' L 0 e0s a o 0 0 0 p 0 0 U m a fl o a Q m m a m m 0 c [) 0 z M Q d c m 0 0 zo m Q m m c .0 0 ® m O Q Vi LO It 0 0 N N co 0 a N Z ro Z Hydrologic Soil Group—Roanoke County and the Cities of Roanoke and Salem, Virginia Soil Map for Hollins Road Hydrologic Soil Group Hydrologic Soil Group— Summary by Map Unit — Roanoke County and the Cities of Roanoke and Salem, Virginia (VA161) Map unit symbol I Map unit name I Rating I Acres in AOI 18D Frederick silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 49B Tumbling loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes. 49C Tumbling loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes B 1 1.0 B 1 4.7 B 1 1.0 49D Tumbling loam, 15 to 25 B 0.5 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 7.1 Description Percent of AOI 13.3% 65.7% 13.4% 7.5% 100.0% Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long -duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (AID, BID, and CID). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when. thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (AID, BID, or CID), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 9!112015 r Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4 Hydrologic Soil Group—Roanoke County and the Cities of Roanoke and Salem, Virginia Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff. None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher Soil Map for Hollins Road uson Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 8!112015 Conservation Service National Cooperative Sol[ Survey Page 4 of 4 Appendix A EDR NEPA Check Mead & Hunt, Inc. 84021600-155994.01 Hollins Road VAROHR1 5119 Hollins Road Roanoke, VA 24019 Inquiry Number; 4399470.22s September 01, 2015 6 Armstrong Road, 41h floor www.edrnet.comt.com Shelton, CT 06484 CEDRO Environmental Data Resources Inc Toll Free: 2.0050 !' TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE EDR NEPACheck® Description ............................................. 1 MapFindings Summary........................................................ 2 NaturalAreas.......................................................................... 3 HistoricSites.......................................................................... 5 FloodPlain............................................................................. 9 Wetlands................................................................................. 11 Wetlands Classification System .......................................... 13 FCC & FAA Sites.................................................................... 17 Key Contacts and Government Records Searched........... 22 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding progrilles does not exist from other Sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. EDR NEPACheck®'DESCRIPTION The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) requires that Federal agencies include in their decision-making processes appropriate and careful consideration of all environmental effects and actions, analyze potential environmental effects of proposed actions and their alternatives for public understanding and scrutiny, avoid or minimize adverse effects of proposed actions, and restore and enhance environmental quality as much as possible. The EDR NEPACheck provides information which may be used, in conjunction with additional research, to determine whether a proposed site or action will have significant environmental effect. The report provides maps and data for the following items (where available). Search results are provided in the Map Findings Summary on page 2 of this report. Section Regulation Natural Areas Map • Federal Lands Data: - Officially designated wilderness areas 47 CFR 1.1307(1) - Officially designated wildlife preserves, sanctuaries 47 CFR 1.1307(2) and refuges - Wild and scenic rivers 40 CFR 6.302(e) - Fish and Wildlife 40 CFR 6.302 • Threatened or Endangered Species, Fish 47 CFR 1.1307(3); 40 CFR 6.302 and Wildlife, Critical Habitat Data (where available) Historic Sites Map • National Register of Historic Places 47 CFR 1.1307(4); 40 CFR 6.302 • State Historic Places (where available) • Indian Reservations Flood Plain Map • National Flood Plain Data (where available) 47 CFR 1.1307(6); 40 CFR 6.302 Wetlands Map • National Wetlands Inventory Data (where available) 47 CFR 1.1307(7); 40 CFR 6.302 FCC & FAA Map • FCC antenna/tower sites, FAA Markings and 47 CFR 1.1307(8) Obstructions, Airports, Topographic gradient Key Contacts and Government Records Searched TC4399470.22s Page 1 of 28 MAP FINDINGS SUMMi4RY The databases searched in this report are fisted below. Database descriptions and other agency contact information is contained in the Key Contacts and Government Records Searched section on page 22 of this report. TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS HOLLINS ROAD VAROHR1 5119 HOLLINS ROAD ROANOKE, VA 24019 TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES Latitude (North): Longitude (West): Universal Tranverse Mercator: UTM X (Meters): UTM Y (Meters): Inquiry #: 4399470.22s Date: 911115 37.329102 - 37° 19'44.8" 79.925697 - 79° 55'32.5" Zone 17 595177.2 4131718.5 Search Distance Within Within Applicable Regulation from 47 CFR/FCC Checklist Database (Miles) Search 118 Mile NATURAL AREAS MAP 1.1307a (1) Officially Designated Wilderness Area 1.1307a (2) Officially Designated Wildlife Preserve 1.1307a (3) Threatened or Endangered Species or Critical Habitat 1.1307a (2) Officially Designated Wildlife Preserve 1.1307a (2) Officially Designated Wildlife Preserve 1.1307a (3) Threatened or Endangered Species or Critical Habitat HISTORIC SITES MAP 1.1307a (4) Listed or eligible for National Register 1.1307a (4) Listed or eligible for National Register FLOODPLAIN MAP 1.1307 (6) Located in a Flood Plain WETLANDS MAP 1.1307 (7) Change in surface features (wetland fill) FCC & FAA SITES MAP US Federal Lands 1.00 NO NO US Federal Lands 1.00 NO NO VA Endangered Species 1.00 YES YES VA Wildlife Areas 1.00 NO NO VA Conservation Lands 1.00 NO NO County Endangered Species County YES NIA VA Historic Sites 1.00 YES NO National Register of Hist. Pla 1.00 YES NO Indian Reservation 1.00 NO NO APPAL -TRAIL 1.00 NO NO FLOODPLAIN 1.00 YES NO NWI 1.00 NO NO Cellular 1.00 NO NO 4G Cellular 1.00 NO NO Antenna Structure Registration 1.00 YES NO Towers 1.00 NO NO AM Antenna 1.00 NO NO FM Antenna 1.00 NO NO FAA DOF 1.00 NO NO Airports 1.00 NO --- Power Lines 1.00 YES --- TC4399470.22s Page 2 of 28 o Target Property Roads County Boundary Waterways ■ Water o Locations Federal Areas Federal Linear Features State Areas ti a State Linear Features Natural Areas Map d 114 112 1 Mlles SITE NAME: Hollins Road VAROHRi CLIENT: Mead & Hunt ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road CONTACT: Teresa Schuller Roanoke VA 24019 INQUIRY #: 4399470.22s LAVLONG: 37.3291/79.9257 DATE: September 1, 2015 TC4399470.2h Page 3of28 'NATURAL AREAS MAP FINDINGS Federal Endangered Species Listed for: ROANOKE County, VA. Source: EPA Endangered Species Protection Program Database FISH: LOGPERCH, ROANOKE PLANT: CONEFLOWER, SMOOTH Map ID Direction Distance EDR ID Distance (ft.) Database II 111111 Y-- 1 SW VA30000018 0-118 mi VA Endangered Species 291 Edrid: VA30000018 Type: FISH TC4399470.22s Page 4 of 28 ')feta Ave NE N x $ i i rn � 1/ d NE w 2 2 m a � m am Isfien Ave NE - * Target Property ♦ Historic Sites N Streets Federal Historic Areas N County Boundary State Historic Areas Waterways us Indian Reservations ■ Water /4t/ Scenic Trail Historic Sites Map � Y11 K ey„1Q' v` 0 114 112 1 Mlles SITE NAME: Hollins Road VAROHRI CLIENT: Mead & Hunt ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road CONTACT: Teresa Schuller Roanoke VA 24019 INQUIRY #: 4399470.22s LAT/LONG: 37.3291 179.9257 DATE: September 1, 2015 TC439947012s NpSofN HISTORIC: SITES MAP FIPIpINGS- Map ID Direction Distance EDR ID Distance (ft.) Database 1 IIYII YYYIYPYYpIYaI — - Al SW 112-1 mi 4361 Resname: Address: City: Vicinity: County: State: Certdate: Multname: Acre: Harshbarger House 316 John Richardson Rd. (Co. Rt. 743) Roanoke (Independent City) X Roanoke VIRGINIA 19921015 Not Reported 2.0+ 92001390 National Register of Hist. Places A2 SSE SW 112-1 mi VA10001450 112-1 mi Resname VA Historic Sites 4433 County: ROANOKE COUNTY Name: HARSHBARGER HOSUE City: Not Reported Site descl: Samuel Harshbarger built the original stone portion of this house, one of Roanoke County's oldest dwellings, in 1797. The use of stone here is a rare reminder of a German -influenced building tradition in the area. Samuel Harshbarger came from Pennsyl Site desc2: vania with a group with a group of Swiss or German Brethren, known as Dunkards. The family added the brick wing around 1825. The Harshbargers are said to have been rigourous in their use of German customs and language. Their Brethren principles led t Site desc3: hem to oppose slavery. Fearing he would be unable to compete with area slaveholding farmers, Samuel's son Jacob sold his portion of the property in 1831 and moved to Indiana. His father eventually followed him, selling his land to John Jeffries in 18 Site desc4: 37. Though now surrounded by suburban development, the house enjoys a protected setting. A recent restoration has enhanced Its historic character. Site desc5: Not Reported Site number: 80-13 Vlr date: 10/09/91 Added date: 10/15/92 Edr id: VA10001450 Isgeo: N 3 SSE 112-1 mi 5253 Resname Address: City: Vicinity: Monterey Tinker Creek Lane, NE Roanoke X 74002146 National Register of Hist. Places TC4399470.22s Page 6 of 28 HISTORIC SITES MAP. .FINDINGS: I 1 Map ID Direction Distance EDR ID Distance (ft.) Database County: Roanoke State: VIRGINIA Ceridate: 19740730 Muitnarne; Not Reported Acre: 117.0+ TC4399470.22s Page 7 of 28 UMMAPPABIE HISTORIC SITES Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped: Status EDR ID Database No unmapped sites were found in EDR's search of available government records. TC4399470.22s Page 8 of 28 Mood Plain Map lo P® Aye _ 1t zo L6/,.f .� I, iaw i ; W ter Oek 15 C. ] 1=rontfe1"aN£ ,a Christian AVe NE u \ b 'M°rnere�` f exp SITE NAME: Hollins Road VAROHRI CLIENT: Mead & Hunt ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road CONTACT: Teresa Schuller Roanoke VA 24019 INQUIRY#: 4399470.22s LAULONG: 37.3291 179,9257 DATE: September 1, 2015 TC4199410.22s Page9of28 0 114 112 1 Miles Major Roads Power Lines Contour Lines Pipe Lines . Water Waterways Fault Lines m -year flood zone NCounty Boundary 500 -year flood zone Electronic FEMA data available Electronic FEMA data not available SITE NAME: Hollins Road VAROHRI CLIENT: Mead & Hunt ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road CONTACT: Teresa Schuller Roanoke VA 24019 INQUIRY#: 4399470.22s LAULONG: 37.3291 179,9257 DATE: September 1, 2015 TC4199410.22s Page9of28 FLOOD PLAIN MAP FINDINGS Source: FEMA DFIRM Flood Data, FEMA Q3 Flood Data County FEMA flood data electronic coverage ROANOKE,VA YES ROANOKE CITY, VA YES Flood Plain panel at target property: 51161C (FEMA DFIRM Flood data) Additional Flood Plain panel(s) in search area: 51161CO024D (FEMA Q3 Flood data) 51161CO028D (FEMA Q3 Flood data) TC4399470.22s Page 10 of 28 National Wetlands inventory Map Iwo IT ID11 Rd low y f j O' ter0A� � � � _ .Salm Richaraao9 ron !er d NF I 111 < f NE bqa Chrlstion Ave NE- - ro Bre { D 114 112 1 Mlles Major Roads )IJ Power Lines Contour Lines f Pipe Lines ■ Water Waterways Fault Lines ® National Wetlands Inventory ,A/ County Boundary Electronic NWI data available Electronic NWI data not available SITE NAME: Hollins Road VAROHRI CLIENT: Mead & Hunt ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road CONTACT: Teresa Schuller Roanoke VA 24019 INQUIRY #: 4399470.22s LATILON& 37.3291 179.9257 DATE: September 1, 2015 TC4399470.22s Page II of 28 WETLANDS MAR'FINDINGS Source: Fish and Wildlife Service NWI data NWI hardcopy map at target property: Roanoke Additional NWI hardcopy map(s) in search area: Not reported in source data Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Code and Description" Database -•�•• • • •• Ill lilliiiiiiiiil liliili� No Sites Reported. *See Wetland Classification System for additional information. TC4399470.22s Page 12 of 28 WETLANDS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM National Wetland Inventory Maps are produced by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, a sub -department of the U.S. Department of the Interior. In 1974, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service developed a criteria for wetland classification with four long range objectives: to describe ecological units that have certain homogeneous natural attributes, to arrange these units in a system that will aid decisions about resource management, to furnish units for inventory and mapping, and to provide uniformity in concepts and terminology throughout the U.S. High altitude infrared photographs, soil maps, topographic maps and site visits are the methods used to gather data for the productions of these maps. In the Infrared photos, wetlands appear as different colors and these wetlands are then classified by type. Using a hierarchical classification, the maps identify wetland and deepwater habitats according to: system subsystem class subclass modifiers (as defined by Cowardin, et al. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS 79131. 1979.) The classification system consists of five systems: 1. marine 2. estuarine 3. riverine 4. lacustrine 5. palustrine The marine system consists of deep water tidal habitats and adjacent tidal wetlands. The riverine system consists of all wetlands contained within a channel. The lacustrine systems includes all nontidal wetlands related to swamps, bogs & marshes. The estuarine system consists of deepwater tidal habitats and where ocean water is diluted by fresh water. The palustrine system includes nontidal wetlands dominated by trees and shrubs and where salinity is below .5% in tidal areas. All of these systems are divided in subsystems and then further divided into class. National Wetland Inventory Maps are produced by transferring gathered data on a standard 7.5 minute U.S.G.S. topographic map. Approximately 52 square miles are covered on a National Wetland Inventory map at a scale of 1:24,000. Electronic data is compiled by digitizing these National Wetland Inventory Maps. TC4399470.22s Page 13 of 28 TC4399470.22s Page 14 of 28 A �m zAAW U w -�ANAM fuv �n ar A W w x N N U •a9�°'�tia�g� u v�u r uvl...�AN LA Iq N a W CY A � � •-t M vl to ° 1 W w �� N w N � 3 M J U � w d � > tng3 rnp3 Q ''7 is d d �vp'mp d t= y Qp N V� [ NMK 1 �.1 V '� J r•i 4d a� pq � G4 4Y7.e p� O GC � 0 CMM/S Ua r W Q J W Q F/1 QO V V] Vl U V2 U rA TC4399470.22s Page 14 of 28 W 3o z� W4 0 0 w 3 a o O � � z x •�, w � � � o � � N � Q r) o 7 zn UviO� e� UO R Ey 79 W u in W ��Ojj •^• N 79 1 ! w�a vii y u P4 �QGw v]1O tD" N M per+ GG U ' /-. V G4 '--' �' 10 �r ..cqmv10n > O �R Cgr`n��0 A pD� U V4) pq V rn D C4 fxl cd 7 Nei �M�7� 0.i !nom W in pi I W W fs7 CID � f A A ¢ A U � � U U Wf/) V] U -u (A U M TC4399470.22s Page 15 of 28 iS a .-- �w r� �7 O Q� a V z U O � •:gg � O� b .0 OW y O V v � p �Anz,A� 71 - Ain w u V A N �•�3zo�wzwA�w � 'D ti x w w w .� LL � wz w � N �z W r� �7 O Q� a V z U O � •:gg � .•-NMdv's Ur $A u 00 �a �4 raw' o � pU d � a a ° U 0.1 rn TG4399470.22s Page 16 of 28 r� �7 O U a w � a wwA� r" V .0 OW y O V q^„ 3 � u 'D ti x w w �y000� y N M ,t GF- V) b � � coi.ob 3 � •a Ta �4 Z U a *� o z f�77ab Q 9o l i l o V w C6 v) `n v, d Gc1 U A W w C7 TG4399470.22s Page 16 of 28 FCC & FAA Sites Map t r. r _ t r 4� 1 ��� �. d 0 a nalla 0 1 , p Water oekFid t Y II 11 o m / 9; Qriaorlu { FD `.� > j R - °f V J _1 i"r°n{farHdryE w @vino A. o Q jdc 4 }j '41 C ` ChrfstiNf an Ave -� - 1 I / __• I,MontereF� 0 114 1/2 1 Was Sites SITE NAME: Hollins Road VAROHRI CLIENT: Mead & Hunt ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road CONTACT: Teresa Schuller Roanoke VA 240-19 INQUIRY #: 4399470.22s LAT/LONG: 37.3291/79.9257 DATE: September 1, 2015 TC4399470.22s Page 17 of 28 Streets Contour Lines County Boundary Waterways Power Lines . Water 0 114 1/2 1 Was Sites SITE NAME: Hollins Road VAROHRI CLIENT: Mead & Hunt ADDRESS: 5119 Hollins Road CONTACT: Teresa Schuller Roanoke VA 240-19 INQUIRY #: 4399470.22s LAT/LONG: 37.3291/79.9257 DATE: September 1, 2015 TC4399470.22s Page 17 of 28 FCC.&'FAASIT.ES MAP FINDINGS TQWERS Map ID Direction Distance EDR ID Distance (ft.) Database I Ill liI IIIIIYYY IYYYIYYYIIIIIIIIIii 1 ANT130000102915 North ANTREG 118-114 mi 738 Regnum: 1261233 Filenum: A0578505 Issuedate: 1/2/2008 Entity: County of Roanoke, VA Strucht: 30.5 Strucadd: Lot NE corner SR601 and SR616 Struccity: Roanoke Strucstate: VA Faastudy: 2007 -AEA -6461 -OE Faacirc: Not Reported Licid: L00002877 Contname: IT Dept 1 Communications Contadd: 1216 Kessler Mill Rd Contpo: Not Reported Contcily: Salem Contstate: VA Contzip: 24153 Edr id: ANT130000102915 This record is for a license, and it may or may not indicate a site which has been built. TC4399470.22s Page 18 of 28 PCC &FAA SLATES MAP FINDINGS :AIRPORTS No Sites Reported. EDR ID Database TC4399 M22s Page 19 of 28 SCG.&FAA SITES: MAP FINDINGS POWERLINES Voltage: 138 Range: Not Reported Hi voltage: 0 Volt cat: 70-138 kV Type: Alternating current Status: Active Corridor: Single line Owner: American Electric Power Owner id: AMELECCO Num owners: Single Owner Operator: Appalachian Power Co. Operator id: APPPOW Last owner: Not Reported Last own id: Not Reported Last aper: Not Reported Last aper id: Not Reported Mileage: 4.3459524600000004 Voltage: 138 Range: Not Reported Hi voltage: 0 Volt cat: 70-138 kV Type: Alternating current Status: Active Corridor: Multiple lines Owner: American Electric Power Owner id: AMELECCO Num owners: Single Owner Operator: Appalachian Power Co. Operator id: APPPOW Last owner: Not Reported Last own id: Not Reported Last oper: Not Reported Last oper id: Not Reported Mileage: .57314151000000002 Voltage: 69 Range: Not Reported Hi voltage: 0 Volt cat: 0-69 W Type: Alternating current Status: Active Corridor: Multiple lines Owner: American Electric Power EDR ID Database 47445 POWERLINES 47444 POWERLINES 47443 POWERLINES TC4399470.22s Page 20 of 28 TCCA. FAASITES MqP FINDINGS POWERLINES...... Owner id: AMELECCO Num owners: Single Owner Operator: Appalachian Power Co. Operator ld: APPPOW Last owner: Not Reported Last own id: Not Reported Last oper: Not Reported Last oper id: Not Reported Mileage: .57314151000000002 Voltage: 69 Range: Not Reported Hi voltage: 0 Volt cat: 0-69 kV Type: Alternating current Status: Active Corridor: Multiple lines Owner: American Electric Power Owner id: AMELECCO Num owners: Single Owner Operator: Appalachian Power Co. Operator id: APPPOW Last owner: Not Reported Last own id: Not Reported Last oiler: Not Reported Last aper id: Not Reported Mileage: 5.4830673799999996 Voltage: 138 Range: Not Reported Hi voltage: 0 Volt cat: 70-138 kV Type: Alternating current Status: Active Corridor: Multiple lines Owner: American Electric Power Owner id: AMELECCO Num owners: Single Owner Operator: Appalachian Power Co. Operator id: APPPOW Last owner: Not Reported Last own id: Not Reported Last aper: Not Reported Last aper id: Not Reported Mileage: 5.4830673799999996 EDR ID Database 47441 POWERLINES 47442 POWERLINES TC4399470.22s Page 21 of 28 KEY CONTACTS & GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED Various Federal laws and executive orders address specific environmental concerns. NEPA requires the responsible offices to integrate to the greatest practical extent the applicable procedures required by these laws and executive orders, EDR provides key contacts at agencies charged with implementing these laws and executive orders to supplement the information contained in this report, NATURAL AREAS Officially designated wilderness areas Government Records Searched in This F FED LAND: Federal Lands Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-5094 Federal data from Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service, Forest Service, and Fish and Wildlife Service. - National Parks - Forests - Monuments -Wildlife Sanctuaries, Preserves, Refuges - Federal Wilderness Areas. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Federal Contacts for Additional Information National Park Service, Northeast Region 200 custom Street, Fifth Floor Philadelphia, PA 19106 215-597-7013 National Park Service, National Capital Region 1100 Ohio Drive, SW Washington, DC 20242 202-619-7256 USDA Forest Service, Southern 1720 Peachtree Road, N.W. Atlanta, GA 30367 404-347-2384 BLM - Eastern States Office 7450 Boston Blvd. Springfield, VA 22153 703-440-1713 Fish & Wildlife Service, Region 5 Div. Of Personnel Mgmt. 300 Westgate Center Drive Hadley, MA 01035-9589 413-253-8313 Officially designated wildlife preserves, sanctuaries and refuges Government Records Searched in This Report FED LAND: Federal Lands Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-5094 Federal data from Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service, Forest Service, and Fish and Wildlife Service. - National Parks - Forests - Monuments - Wildlife Sanctuaries, Preserves, Refuges - Federal Wilderness Areas. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 TC4399470.22s Page 22 of 28 VA Conservation Lands: Conservation Lands This dataset contains the boundaries for lands of conservation and recreational interest. Source: Department of Conservation and Recreation. Telephone: 804-786-7951 VA Wildlife Management Areas: Wildlife Management Areas This dataset contains the boundaries for lands of conservation and recreational interest. Source: Department of Conservation and Recreation. Telephone: 804-786-7951 Federal Contacts for Additional Information Fish & Wildlife Service, Region 5 Div. Of Personnel Mgmt. 300 Westgate Center Drive Hadley, MA 01035-9589 413-253-8313 State Contacts for Additional Information Wild and scenic rivers Government Records Searched in This Re FED LAND: Federal Lands Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-5094 Federal data from Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service, Forest Service, and Fish and Wildlife Service. - National Parks - Forests - Monuments -Wildlife Sanctuaries, Preserves, Refuges - Federal Wilderness Areas. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Federal Contacts for Additional Information Fish & Wildlife Service, Region 5 Div. Of Personnel Mgmt. 300 Westgate Center Drive Hadley, MA 01035-9589 413-253-8313 Endangered Species Government Records Searched in This Report Endangered Species Protection Program Database A listing of endangered species by county. Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-305-5239 VA Endangered Species: VA Endangered Species Virginia Endangered Species Source: Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. Telephone: 804-367-1000 TC4399470,22s Page 23 of 28 Federal Contacts for Additional Information Fish & Wildlife Service, Region 5 Div. Of Personnel Mgmt. 300 Westgate Center Drive Hadley, MA 01035-9589 413-253-8313 State Contacts for Additional Information Div, Of Natural Heritage, Dept. of Conservation & Recreation 804-367-1000 LANDMARKS, HISTORICAL, AND ARCHEOLOGICAL SITES Historic Places Government Records Searched in This Report National Register of Historic Places: The National Register of Historic Places is the official federal list of districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering, and culture. These contribute to an understanding of the historical and cultural foundations of the nation. The National Register includes: - All prehistoric and historic units of the National Park System; - National Historic Landmarks, which are properties recognized by the Secretary of the Interior as possessing national significance; and - Properties significant in American, state, or local prehistory and history that have been nominated by State Historic Preservation Officers, federal agencies, and others, and have been approved for listing by the National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 03/23/2006 VA Historic Sites: The Virginia Landmarks Register A listing of historic sites on the State register. A compilation of the states buildings structures sites and districts that have been officially designated as historic landmarks by the Virginia Board of Historic Resources over the past thirty years. Source: Department of Historic Resources. Telephone: 804-367-2323 Federal Contacts for Additional Information Park Service; Advisory Council on Historic Preservation 1849 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240 Phone: (202) 208-6843 State Contacts for Additional Information Department of Historic Resources 804-367-2323 Indian Religious Sites Government Records Searched in This Report Indian Reservations: This map layer portrays Indian administrated lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Source: USGS Phone: 888-275-8747 Date of Government Version: 12131/2005 TC4399470.22s Page 24 of 28 Federal Contacts for Additional Information Department of the Interior- Bureau of Indian Affairs Office of Public Affairs 1849 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20240-0001 Office: 202-208-3711 Fax: 202-501-1516 National Association of Tribal Historic Preservation Officers 1411 K Street NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC 20005 Phone: 202-628-8476 Fax: 202-628-2241 State Contacts for Additional Information A listing of local Tribal Leaders and Bureau of Indian Affairs Representatives can be found at: http://www.doi.gov/bia/areas/agency.html Scenic Trails Government Records Searched in This Report APPAL—TRAIL: Appalachian National Scenic Trail Source: Appalachian Trail Conservancy and National Park Service Appalachian Trail Park Office Telephone: (304) 535-6278 Appalachian Trail centerline. State Contacts for Additional Information Appalachian Trail Conference 799 Washington Street P.O. Box 807 Harpers Ferry, WV 25425-0807 (304) 535-6331 Potomac Heritage Partnership 1623 28th Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20007 202-338-6222 FLOOD PLAIN, WETLANDS AND COASTAL ZONE Flood Plain Management Government Records Searched in This Report Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100 -year and 500 -year flood zones as defined by FEMA. Federal Contacts for Additional Information Federal Emergency Management Agency 877-3362-627 State Contacts for Additional Information Department of Emergency Services 804-897-6500 TC4399470.22s Page 25 of 28 KEY CONTACrS.&GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED Wetlands Protection Government Records Searched in This Report NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Federal Contacts for Additional Information Fish & Wildlife Service 813-570-5412 State Contacts for Additional Information Dept. of Game & Inland Fisheries 804-367-9231 Coastal Zone Management Government Records Searched in This Report CAMA Management Areas Dept. of Env., Health & Natural Resources 919-733-2293 Federal Contacts for Additional Information Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management WORM, SSMC4 1305 East-West Highway Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 301-713-3102 State Contacts for Additional Information Coastal Program, Dept. of Environmental Quality 804-698-4320 FCC & FAA SITES MAP For NEPA actions that come under the authority of the FCC, the FCC requires evaluation of Antenna towers and/or supporting structures that are to be equipped with high intensity white lights which are to be located in residential neighborhoods, as defined by the applicable zoning law. Government Records Searched in This Report Cellular Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 888-225-5322 4G Cellular Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 888-225-5322 Antenna Structure Registration Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 888-225-5322 TC4399470.22s Page 26 of 28 KEY: CONTACTS & GOVERNAIIENT RECORDS SEARCHED Towers Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 888-225-5322 AM Antenna Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 888-225-5322 FM Antenna Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 888-225-5322 FAA Digital Obstacle File Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 1305 East-West Highway, Station 5631 Silver Sprinng, MD 20910-3281 Telephone: 301-713-2817 Describes known obstacles of interest to aviation users in the US. Used by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to manage the National Airspace System. Airport Landing Facilities Federal Aviation Administration Telephone (800) 457-6656 Private and public use landing facilities. Electric Power Transmission Line Data PennWell Corporation 800-823-6277 This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Excessive Radio Frequency Emission For NEPA actions that come under the authority of the FCC, Commission actions granting construction permits, licenses to transmit or renewals thereof, equipment authorizations or modifications in existing facilities, require the determination of whether the particular facility, operation or transmitter would cause human exposure to levels of radio frequency in excess of certain limits. Federal Contacts for Additional Information Office of Engineering and Technology Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street SW Washington, DC 20554 Phone: 202-418-2470 TC4399476.22s Page 27 of 28 KEY CONTACTS &GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED OTHER CONTACT SOURCES STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION {c} 2010 Tole Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC4399470.22s Page 28 of 28 Appendix B VADCR Letter USFWS Generic Guidance letter Mead & Hunt, 111C. R4021600-155994.01 Molly Joseph WardJoe ) Elton Secretary of Natural Resources Deputy Direelor orOperations Clyde E. Cristman Rochelle Altholz Director Deputy Director of Administration and Finance +CGIMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA David Dowling Deptio , Director of DEPARTMENT OF CONSE;R%"ATION AND RECREATION Soil and water and Dain Safety August 24, 2015 Teresa Schuller Mead and Hunt, Inc. 400 Tracy Way, Suite 200V Charleston, W 25311 Re: VAROHRI, Hollins Road Cell Tower Dear Ms. Schuller: The Department of Conservation and Recreation's Division of Natural Heritage (DCR) has searched its Biotics Data System for occurrences of natural heritage resources from the area outlined on the submitted map. Natural heritage resources are defined as the habitat of rare, threatened, or endangered plant and animal species, unique or exemplary natural communities, and significant geologic formations. According to the information currently in our files, the Roanoke River — North and South Forks Stream Conservation Unit (SCU) is downstream of the project site. SCUs identify stream reaches that contain aquatic natural heritage resources, including 2 miles upstream and 1 mile downstream of documented occurrences, and all tributaries within this reach. SCUs are given a biodiversity significance ranking based on the rarity, quality, and number of element occurrences they contain; on a scale of 1-5, 1 being most significant, The Roanoke River — North and South Forks SCU has been given a biodiversity significance ranking of B2, which represents a site of very high significance. The natural heritage resources of concern associated with this SCU are: Noturus gilberti Orangefin madtom G2/S2/SOC/LT Percina rex Roanoke logperch G I 02/S 1 S2/LE/LE Allocapnia simmonsi Spatulate snowfly G3/S182/NL/NL The Orangefin madtom is native to the Roanoke and James River systems of North Carolina and Virginia (NatureServe, 2009). The Orangefm madtom inhabits moderate to strong riffles and runs having little or no silt in moderate -gradient, intermontane and upper Piedmont streams. This species is an intersticine dweller, found in or near cavities formed by rubble and boulders (Jenkins and Burkhead, 1993). PIease note that this species is currently classified as a species of concern (not a legal designation) by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and as threatened by the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries (VDGIF). Threats to the Orangefin madtom include channelization, siltation, various forms of chronic pollution, catastrophic chemical spills, impoundment, dewatering, and bait -seining (NatureServe, 2009). Its low reproductive rate and short life span (Simonson 1997, Simonson and Neves 1992, Simonson 1987) exacerbate these threats (Burkhead and Jenkins 1991), The Roanoke logperch is endemic to the Roanoke and Chowan River drainages in Virginia (Burkhead and Jenkins, 199 1) and inhabits medium and Iarge, warm and usually clear rivers with sandy to boulder spotted 600 East Main Street, 20 Floor I Richmond, Virginia 23219 1 804-786-6124 State Parks • Soil and Water Conservation • Outdoor Recreation Planning Natural Heritage • Dam Safety and Floodplain Management • Land Conservation bottoms (NatureServe, 2009). Please note that this species is currently classified as endangered by the USFWS and the VDGIF. The Roanoke logperch is threatened by channelization, siltation, impoundment, pollution, and de -watering activities (Burkhead & Jenkins, 1991). Spatulate snowfly is a stonefly documented in only two locations in Virginia. Stoneflies are generally medium- sized to small, somewhat flattened, soft -bodied, rather drab -colored insects found near streams or rocky lake shores (Borror, 1981). They are poor fliers and are seldom found far from water, Stonefly nymphs are often found under stones in streams but may occasionally be found anywhere in a stream where food is available (Borror, 1981). Stoneflies are highly sensitive to any practices that degrade the quality of its aquatic habitat. In addition, Tinker Creek has been designated by the VDGIF as a "Threatened and Endangered Species Water" and is downstream of the project site. The species associated with this T & E Water is the Roanoke logperch. There is the potential for the Northern Long-eared bat (Myons septentrionalis, G1 G3/S31LT/NL) to occur within the project area. The Northern Long-eared bat is a small insect -eating bat characterized by its long -rounded ears that when folded forward extend beyond the tip of the nose. Hibernation occurs in caves, mines and tunnels from late fall through early spring and bats occupy summer roosts comprised of older trees including single and multiple tree -fall gaps, standing snags and woody debris. Threats include white nose syndrome and loss of hibemacula, maternity roosts and foraging habitat (NatureServe, 2014). Due to the decline in population numbers, the Northern Long-eared bat has been federally listed as "threatened" by the USFWS. To minimize adverse impacts to the aquatic ecosystem as a result of the proposed activities, DCR recommends the implementation of and strict adherence to applicable state and local erosion and sediment control/storm water management laws and regulations. Due to the legal status of the Roanoke logperch and Orangefin madtom, DCR also recommends coordination with the USFWS and the VDGIF to ensure compliance with protected species legislation. Finally, DCR recommends coordination with the USFWS regarding potential impacts upon federally threatened Northern Long-eared bats associated with tree removal. This project is situated on karst-forming carbonate rock and can be characterized by sinkholes, caves, disappearing streams, and large springs. If such features are encountered during the project, please coordinate with Wil Orndorff (540-230-5960, W l.Omdorff(a,dcr.virginia.gov) to document and minimize adverse impacts. Discharge of runoff to sinkholes or sinking streams, filling of sinkholes, and alteration of cave entrances can lead to surface collapse, flooding, erosion and sedimentation, groundwater contamination, and degradation of subterranean habitat for natural heritage resources. If the project involves filling or "improvement" of sinkholes or cave openings, DCR would like detailed location information and copies of the design specifications. In cases where sinkhole improvement is for stormwater discharge, copies of VDOT Form EQ -120 will suffice. New "Karst Assessment Guidelines" developed by the Virginia Cave Board for land development can be found at littp://www,dcr.virginia.izov/natural heritage/documents/karst assessment guidelines.pdf. In addition, according to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Guidance dated September 14, 2000 "new construction of communication towers creates a potentially significant impact on migratory birds, especially some 350 species of night -migrating birds". "Communications towers are estimated to kill 4-5 million birds per year and some of these species affected are also protected under the Endangered Species Act and Bald and Golden Eagle Act" (USFWS, 2000). Therefore, DCR recommends voluntary implementation of USFWS interim guidelines for Communication Tower Siting, Construction, Operation, and Decommissioning htt ://www.fws. ov/northeast/vir iniafield/ df/ends ecies/Cell°/`20Towers/Cell%20Guidance.PDF. Under a Memorandum of Agreement established between the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (VDACS) and the DCR, DCR represents VDACS in comments regarding potential impacts on state - listed threatened and endangered plant and insect species. The current activity will not affect any documented state -listed plants or insects. There are no State Natural Area Preserves under DCR's jurisdiction in the project vicinity. New and updated information is continually added to Biotics. Please re -submit a completed order form and project map for an update on this natural heritage information if the scope of the project changes and/or six months has passed before it is utilized. A fee of $125.00 has been assessed for the service of providing this information. Please find enclosed an invoice for that amount. Please return one copy of the invoice along with your remittance made payable to the Treasurer of Virginia, Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, 600 East Main Street, 24'" Floor, Richmond, VA 23219. Payment is due within thirty days of the invoice date. Please note late payment may result in the suspension of project review service for future projects. The VDGTF maintains a database of wildlife locations, including threatened and endangered species, trout streams, and anadromous fish waters that may contain information not documented in this letter. Their database may be accessed from http://vafwis.org/fwis/ or contact Ernie Aschenbach at 804-367-2733 or Emic.Aschetibach@dgifvirginia.gov. Should you have any questions or concerns, feel free to contact me at 804-371-2708. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. Sincerely, r S. Ren6 Hypes Project Review Coordinator CC: Ernie Aschenbach, VDGIF Troy Anderson, USFWS Wil Orndorff, DCR-Karst Literature Cited Borror, D.J., D. M. De Long, and C. A. Triplehorn. 1981. An Introduction to the Study of Insects. Saunders College Publishing, Philadelphia. Burkhead, N.M. and R.E. Jenkins. 1991. Roanoke logperch. In Virginia's Endangered Species: Proceedings of a Symposium. K. Terwilliger ed. The McDonald and Woodward Publishing Company, Blacksburg, Virginia. p. 395-397. Jenkins, R. E., and N. M. Burkhead. 1993. Freshwater fishes of Virginia. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland. NatureServe. 2009. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.1. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Available http:I/www.natureserve.org/explorer. (Accessed: June 21, 2010). NatureServe, 2014. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.1. NatureServe. Arlington, Virginia. Available http://explorer.natureserve.orm (Accessed: December 22, 2014). Simonson, T. D. 1987. Distribution, ecology, and reproductive biology of the orangefin madtom (Noturus gilberti). M.S. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg. Simonson, T. D. 1997. Orangefin madtom. Pages 15-16 in E. F. Menhinick and A. L. Braswell, editors. Endangered, threatened, and rare fauna of North Carolina. Part IV. A reevaluation of the freshwater fishes. Occasional Papers of the North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences and the North Carolina Biological Survey No. 11. Simonson, T. D., and R. J. Neves. 1992. Habitat suitability and reproductive traits of the orangefin madtom NOTURUS GILBERTI (Pisces: Ictaluridae). American Midland Naturalist 127:115-24. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2000. Interim Guidelines for Recommendations on Communications Tower Siting, Construction, Operation, and Decommissioning. Teresa Schuller From: Teresa Schuller Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 10:54 AM To: ernie.aschenbach@dgif.virginia.gov; troy.anderson@va.gov Subject: Comments on Hollins Road VADCR letter Attachments: 11SFWS official species list.pdf; VADCR response letter.pdf; iPaC resources.pdf; topo spot .pdf; ESA Pictures.pdf Importance: High Categories: Filed by Newforma Ernie and Troy — This letter was received from Renee Hypes and she recommended coordination with your agencies. If you would please let me know if there is any additional information, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. Teresa A. Schuller I Sr. Environmental Project Manager I Associate Mead & Hunt I M & H Architecture, Inc 1400 Tracy Way, Suite 2001 Charleston, West Virginia 25311 Direct: 681-313-46171 Mobile: 304-415-91841 Fax: 304-345-6714 teresa.schuller@meadhunt.com I www.meadliunt,com No response received from either agency as of 10/7/15 .1 J .S IPaC Trust Resource Report US Fish & Wildlife Service IPaC Trust Resource Report Project Description NAME Hollins Road Tower PROJECT CODE ME3BQ-4QEZR-CGTCL-S5KXLJ-A3VXBM LOCATION Roanoke County, Virginia DESCRIPTION construction of a 195 -ft monopole within a 75 -ft x 75 -ft compound with new access road and utility easement. ME3BQ-4QEZR-CGTCL-S5KXU-A3VXBM U.S. Fish & Wildlife Contact Information Species in this report are managed by: Virginia Ecological Services Field Office 6669 Short Lane Gloucester, VA 23061-4410 (804) 693-6694 07130/2015 01:03 IPaC Information for Planning and Conservation Page 2 IPaC Trust Resource Report Endangered Species ME3BQ-4QEZR-CCTCL-S5KXU-A3VXBM Proposed, candidate, threatened, and endangered species that are managed by the Endangered Species Program and should be considered as part of an effect analysis for this project. This unofficial species list is for informational purposes only and does not fulfill the requirements under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, which states that Federal agencies are required to "request of the Secretary of Interior information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed action." This requirement applies to projects which are conducted, permitted or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can be obtained by returning to this project on the IPaC website and requesting an Official Species List from the regulatory documents section. Fishes Roanoke Logpereh Percina rex CRITICAL HABITAT No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https:llecos.fws.00v/speciesProfile/ ro�peciesProfrle.action?spcode=E01 G Mammals Indiana Bat Myotis sodalis CRITICAL HABITAT No critical habitat has been designated for this species, https:l/ecos,fws.uov/speciesProfrle/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=A000 Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis CRITICAL HABITAT No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https:llecos.fws.aov/speciesProfilelprofile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=AOJE Critical Habitats Endangered Endangered Potential effects to critical habitat(s) within the project area must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves. There is no critical habitat within this project area W/30120 15 01:03 IPaC Information for Planning and Conservation Page 3 IPaC Trust Resource Reporl Migratory Birds ME3B(-)-401-:ZR-CGTCL•-S5KXU-.A3VXBM Birds are protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. Any activity which results in the take of migratory birds or eagles is prohibited unless authorized by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1). There are no provisions for allowing the take of migratory birds that are unintentionally killed or injured. You are responsible for complying with the appropriate regulations for the protection of birds as part of this project. This involves analyzing potential impacts and implementing appropriate conservation measures for all project activities. Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bird of conservation concern Year-round https:liecos fws-gov/speciesProtile/ roohle/speciesProfile action?spcode=8008 Black -billed Cuckoo Coccyzus erythropthalmus Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding htt s://ecos.fws. ov/s eciesProfrle/ rofile/s eciesProfile action?s code=BOHI Blue -winged Warbler Vermivora pinus Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding Fox Sparrow Passerella iliaca Bird of conservation concerti Season: wintering Golden -winged Warbler Vermivora chrysoptera Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding https://ecos fws.govlspeciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?speode=BOG4 Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding Loggerhead Shrike Lanius ludovicianus Bird of conservation concern Year-round his•Jlecos.fws.govlspeciesProfrle/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=BOFY Louisiana Waterthrush Parkesia motacilla Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding Pied -billed Grebe Podilymbus podiceps Bird of conservation concern Year-round Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes orythrocephalus Bird of conservation, concern Year-round Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Bird of conservation concern Season: Wintering Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding Worm Eating Warbler Helmitheros vermivorum Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding 07/3012015 04:03 1PaC Information for Planning and Conservation PacJr, 1 IPaC Trust Resource Report ME3BQ-40EZR-CCTCL-S51<XU-A3VXBM Yellow -bellied Sapsucker sphyrapicus varius Bird of conservation concern Season: Breeding https:llecos fws aov/speciesProfilel rop file/speciesProfile action?spcode=BOFR 0713012015 01:03 IPaC Information for Planning and Conservation Paye 5 WaC Trust Resource Report Refuges ME3BQ-4QEZR-CCTC L-S5KXLl-A3VXBM Any activity proposed on National Wildlife Refuge lands must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. If your project overlaps or otherwise impacts a Refuge, please contact that Refuge to discuss the authorization process. There are no refuges within this project area 07/30/2015 01:03 Mac Information for Planning and Conservation Page 6 IPaC Trust Resource Report Wetlands ME3BQ-4 QEZR-CGTCL-S5KXU-A3VXBM Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats from your project may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal Statutes. Project proponents should discuss the relationship of these requirements to their project with the Regulatory Program of the appropriate U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District. DATA LIMITATIONS The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwator habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis. The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts„ the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems. Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site, DATA EXCLUSIONS Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery. DATA PRECAUTIONS Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities. Wetland data is unavailable at this time. 07/3012015 01:03 IPaG Information for Planning and Conservation Page 7 United States Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Washington, DC 20240 September 14, 2000 To: Regional Directors From: Director Isl Jamie Rappaport Clark Subject: Service Guidance on the Siting, Construction, Operation and Decommissioning of Communications Towers Construction of communications towers (including radio, television, cellular, and microwave) in the United States has been growing at an exponential rate, increasing at an estimated 6 percent to 8 percent annually. According to the Federal Communication Commission's 2000 Antenna Structure Registry, the number of lighted towers greater than 199 feet above ground level (AGL) currently number over 45,000 and the total number of towers over 74,000. Non-compliance with the registry program is estimated at 24 percent to 38 percent, bringing the total to 92,000 to 102,000. By 2003, all television stations must be digital, adding potentially 1,000 new towers exceeding 1,000 feet AGL. The construction of new towers creates a potentially significant impact on migratory birds, especially some 350 species of night -migrating birds. Communications towers arc estimated to kill 4-5 million birds per year, which violates the spirit and the intent of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Code of Federal Regulations at Part 50 designed to implement the MBTA. Some of the species affected are also protected under the Endangered Species Act and Bald and Golden Eagle Act. Service personnel may become involved in the review of proposed tower sitings and/or in the evaluation of tower impacts on migratory birds through National Environmental Policy Act review; specifically, Sections 1501.6, opportunity to be a cooperating agency, and 1503.4, duty to comment on federally - licensed activities for agencies with jurisdiction by law, in this case the MBTA, or because of special expertise. Also, the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act requires that any activity on Refuge lands be determined as compatible with the Refuge system mission and the Refuge purpose(s). In addition, the Service is required by the ESA to assist other Federal agencies in ensuring that any action they authorize, implement, or fund will not jeopardize the continued existence of any Federally endangered or threatened species. A Communication Tower Working Group composed of government agencies, industry, academic researchers and NGO's has been formed to develop and implement a research protocol to determine the best ways to construct and operate towers to prevent bird strikes. Until the research study is completed, or until research efforts uncover significant new mitigation measures, all Service personnel involved in the review of proposed tower sitings and/or the evaluation of the impacts of towers on migratory birds should use the attached interim guidelines when making recommendations to all companies, license applicants, or licensees proposing new tower sitings. These guidelines were developed by Service personnel from research conducted in several eastern, midwestern, and southern states, and have been refined through Regional review. They are based on the best information available at this time, and are the most prudent and effective measures for avoiding bird strikes at towers. We believe that they will provide significant protection for migratory birds pending completion of the Working Group's recommendations. As new information becomes available, the guidelines will be updated accordingly. Implementation of these guidelines by the communications industry is voluntary, and our recommendations must be balanced with Federal Aviation Administration requirements and local community concerns where necessary. Field offices have discretion in the use of these guidelines on a case by case basis, and may also have additional recommendations to add which are specific to their geographic area. Also attached is a Towey Site Evaluation Form which may prove useful in evaluating proposed towers and in streamlining the evaluation process. Copies may be provided to consultants or tower companies who regularly submit requests for consultation, as well as to those who submit individual requests that do not contain sufficient information to allow adequate evaluation. This form is for discretionary use, and may be modified as necessary. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703-712) prohibits the taking, killing, possession, transportation, and importation of migratory birds, their eggs, parts, and nests, except when specifically authorized by the Department of the Interior. While the Act has no provision for allowing unauthorized take, it must be recognized that some birds may be killed at structures such as communications towers even if all reasonable measures to avoid it are implemented. The Service's Division of Law Enforcement carries out its mission to protect migratory birds not only through investigations and enforcement, but also through fostering relationships with individuals and industries that proactively seek to eliminate their impacts on migratory birds. While it is not possible under the Act to absolve individuals or companies from liability if they follow these recommended guidelines, the Division of Law Enforcement and Department of Justice have used enforcement and prosecutorial discretion in the past regarding individuals or companies who have made good faith efforts to avoid the take of migratory birds. Please ensure that all field personnel involved in review of FCC licensed communications tower proposals receive copies of this memorandum. Questions regarding this issue should be directed to Dr. Benjamin Tuggle, Chief, Division of Habitat Conservation, at (703)358-2161, or Jon Andrew, Chief, Division of Migratory Bird Management, at (703)3 58-1714. These guidelines will be incorporated in a Director's Order and placed in the Fish and Wildlife Service Manual at a future date. Service Interim Guidelines For Recommendations On Communications Tower Siting, Construction, Operation, and Decommissioning 1. Any company/applicant/licensee proposing to construct a new communications tower should be strongly encouraged to collocate the communications equipment on an existing communication tower or other structure (e.g., billboard, water tower, or building mount). Depending on tower load factors, from 6 to 10 providers may collocate on an existing tower. 2. 1f collocation is not feasible and a new tower or towers are to be constructed, communications service providers should be strongly encouraged to construct towers no more than 199 feet above ground level (AGL), using construction techniques which do not require guy wires (e.g., use a lattice structure, monopole, etc.). Such towers should be unlighted if Federal Aviation Administration regulations permit. 3. If constructing multiple towers, providers should consider the cumulative impacts of all of those towers to migratory birds and threatened and endangered species as well as the impacts of each individual tower. 4. If at all possible, new towers should be sited within existing "antenna farms" (clusters of towers). Towers should not be sited in or near wetlands, other known bird concentration areas (e.g., state or Federal refuges, staging areas, rookeries), in known migratory or daily movement flyways, or in habitat of threatened or endangered species. Towers should not be sited in areas with a high incidence of fog, mist, and low ceilings. 5. If taller (>199 feet AGL) towers requiring lights for aviation safety must be constructed, the minimum amount of pilot warning and obstruction avoidance lighting required by the FAA should be used. Unless otherwise required by the FAA, only white (preferable) or red strobe lights should be used at night, and these should be the minimum number, minimum intensity, and minimum number of flashes per minute (longest duration between flashes) allowable by the FAA. The use of solid red or pulsating red warning lights at night should be avoided. Current research indicates that solid or pulsating (beacon) red lights attract night -migrating birds at a much higher rate than white strobe lights. Red strobe lights have not yet been studied. C. Tower designs using guy wires for support which are proposed to be located in known raptor or waterbird concentration areas or daily movement routes, or in major diurnal migratory bird movement routes or stopover sites, should have daytime visual markers on the wires to prevent collisions by these diurnally moving species. (For guidance on markers, see Avian Power Line Interaction Committee (APLIC). 1994. Mitigating .Bird Collisions with Power Lines: The State of the Art in 1994. Edison Electric Institute, Washington, D. C., 78 pp, and Avian Power Line Interaction Committee (APLIC). 1996. Suggested Practices for Raptor Protection on Power Lines. Edison Electric Institute/Raptor Research Foundation, Washington, D. C., 128 pp. Copies can be obtained via the Internet at http://www.eei.org/resources/pubeat/enviro/, or by calling 1- 800/334-5453). 7. Towers and appendant facilities should be sited, designed and constructed so as to avoid or minimize habitat loss within and adjacent to the tower "footprint". However, a larger tower footprint is preferable to the use of guy wires in construction. Road access and fencing should be minimized to reduce or prevent habitat fragmentation and disturbance, and to reduce above ground obstacles to birds in flight. 8. If significant numbers of breeding, feeding, or roosting birds are known to habitually use the proposed tower construction area, relocation to an alternate site should be recommended. If this is not an option, seasonal restrictions on construction may be advisable in order to avoid disturbance during periods of high bird activity. 9. In order to reduce the number of towers needed in the future, providers should be encouraged to design new towers structurally and electrically to accommodate the applicant/licensee's antennas and comparable antennas for at least two additional users (minimum of three users for each tower structure), unless this design would require the addition of lights or guy wires to an otherwise unlighted and/or unguyed tower. 10. Security lighting for on -ground facilities and equipment should be down -shielded to keep light within the boundaries of the site. 11. If a tower is constructed or proposed for construction, Service personnel or researchers from the Communication Tower Working Group should be allowed access to the site to evaluate bird use, conduct dead -bird searches, to place net catchments below the towers but above the ground, and to place radar, Global Positioning System, infrared, thermal imagery, and acoustical monitoring equipment as necessary to assess and verify bird movements and to gain information on the impacts of various tower sizes, configurations, and lighting systems. 12, Towers no longer in use or determined to be obsolete should be removed within 12 months of cessation of use. In order to obtain information on the extent to which these guidelines are being implemented, and to identify any recurring problems with their implementation which may necessitate modifications, letters provided in response to requests for evaluation of proposed towers should contain the following request: "In order to obtain information on the usefulness of these guidelines in preventing bird strikes, and to identify any recurring problems with their implementation which may necessitate modifications, please advise us of the final location and specifications of the proposed tower, and which of the measures recommended for the protection of migratory birds were implemented. If any of the recommended measures can not be implemented, please explain why they were not feasible." Return to Hance Pate III ''`'f United States Department of the Interior F � VICE F�, • \11ri� seRuios u, ri -% FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE R, Virginia Ecological Services Field Office' 6669 SHORT LANE''our-,`'' GLOUCESTER, VA 23061 PHONE: (804)693-6694 FAX: (804)693-9032 URL: www.fws.gov/northeast/virginiafteld/ Consultation Code: 05E2VA00-2015-SLI-2920 July 30, 2015 Event Code: 05E2VA00-2015-E-03031 Project Name: Hollins Road Tower Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project To Whom It May Concern: The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 etseq.). New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list. The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or designated critical habitat. A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human enviromnent as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12. If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at: http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/eaglc_guidance.htm]). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and bats. Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentB ]rdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://www.towerkill.com; and httpJ/www.fws.gov/lnigratorybirds/CuiTentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/comtow.html. We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit to our office. Attachment 2 •, vs. United States Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Project narne: Hollins. Road Tower Official Species List Provided by: Virginia Ecological Services Field Office 6669 SHORT LANE GLOUCESTER, VA 23061 (804)693-6694 http://www.fws.gov/noilheast/virginiaficid/ Consultation Code: 05E2VA00-2015-SLI-2920 Event Code: 05E2VA00-2015-E-03031 Project Type: COMMUNICATIONS TOWER Project Name: Hollins Road Tower Project Description: construction of a 195 -ft monopole within a 75 -ft x 75 -ft compound with new access road and utility easement. Please Note: The FWS office may have modified the Project Name and/or Project Description, so it may be different from what was submitted in your previous request. If the Consultation Code matches, the FWS considers this to be the same project. Contact the office in the 'Provided by' section of your previous Official Species list if you have any questions or concerns. http://ccos.fws.gov/ipac, 07/30/2015 01:16 PM 1 United States Department of Interior SSRVIOH Fish and Wildlife Service Project name: Hollins Road. Tower Project Location Map: n Project Coordinates: WLTIPOLYGON (((-79.92522704607836 37.3297100379092, - 79.9252849817276 37.32912053434762, -79.92558109766833 37.32913162489907, - 79.92559397223886 37.329099206379496, -79.92564493421014 37.3291073109944 1, - 79.92564976215363 37.3291546591361, -79.92533326148987 37.32914186234222, - 7992526888847351 37.329717715908174, -79.92522704607836 37.3297100379092))) Project Counties: Roanoke, VA http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac, 07130/2015 01:16 PM 2 Endangered Species Act Species List There are a total of 3 threatened or endangered species on your species list. Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. Critical habitats listed under the Has Critical Habitat column may or may not lie within your project area. See the Critical habitats within your project area section further below for critical habitat that ties within your project. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions. Fishes seemoe United States Department of Interior Condition(s) Roanoke logperch (Percina rex) Population: Entire Endangered Fish and Wildlife Service Mammals Project name: Hollins Road Tower Endangered Species Act Species List There are a total of 3 threatened or endangered species on your species list. Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. Critical habitats listed under the Has Critical Habitat column may or may not lie within your project area. See the Critical habitats within your project area section further below for critical habitat that ties within your project. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions. Fishes Status Has Critical Habitat Condition(s) Roanoke logperch (Percina rex) Population: Entire Endangered Mammals Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) Population: Entire Endangered Northern long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis) Threatened http:llecos.fws.gov/ipac, 07/30/2015 01:16 PM 3 "�:. aorta tiunura Sa�Hoa United States Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Project name: Hollins Road Tower Critical habitats that lie within your project area There are no critical habitats within your project area. http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac, 07/30/2015 01:16 PM 4 Appendix C SHFO Clearance Letter e -Form 620 Mead & Hunt, lnc. R4021600-155994.01 Teresa Schuller From: towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 4:45 PM To: Teresa Schuller Subject: Section 106 Notification of SHPO/THPO Concurrence- Email ID #1376382 This is to notify you that the Lead SHPO/THPO has concurred with the following filing: Date of Action: 08/28/2015 Direct Effect: No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE Visual Effect: No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE Comment Text: We believe that the undertaking will have No Adverse Effect on historic properties listed in or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, specifically the Rudd House (080-0417) and the Christian Nininger House (080-0034). Chris Novelli Virginia Department of Historic Resources File Number: 0006895738 TCNS Number: 129587 Purpose: Update Original Purpose: New Tower Submission Packet Notification Date: 7AM EST 08/06/2015 Applicant: Apex Towers, LLC Consultant: Mead & Hunt, Inc. Positive Train Control Filing Subject to Expedited Treatment Under Program Comment: No Site Name: Hollins Road (VAROHRI) Site Address: Hollins Road Detailed Description of Project: Site Coordinates: 37-19-44.9 N, 79-55-32.5 W City: Roanoke County: ROANOKE State:VA Lead SHPO/THPO: Virginia Department of Historic Resources NOTICE OF FRAUDULENT USE OF SYSTEM, ABUSE OF PASSWORD AND RELATED MISUSE Use of the Section 106 system is intended to facilitate consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable laws. Any person having access to Section 106 information shall use it only for its intended purpose. Appropriate action will be taken with respect to any misuse of the system. FCC Form 620 Notification Date: 7AM EST 08/06/2015 File Number. 0006895738 FCC Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Approved by OMB New Tower ("NT") Submission Packet 3060-1039 See instructions for public burden estimates General Information 1) (Select only one) ( UA ) NE — New UA — Update of Application WD — Withdrawal of Application 2) It this application is for an Update or Withdrawal, enter the file number of the pending application File Number: 0006895738 currently on file. ucant Inrormaiion 3) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 0024458069 4) Name: Apex Towers, LLC Contact Name 6) First Name: David 6) MI: 7) Last Name: McClure :1 E)nUffix-1 9) Title: Rnnforef Infnrmnfinn 10) P.O. Box: 7nd 11) Street Address: 125 Whitestick Road 12) City: Beckley 13) State: WV 14) Zip Code: 25801 15) Telephone Number: (304)256-6428 P16)Faxmber: (304)252.1852 17) E-mail Address: dmcclure@apex4owers.com Consultant Information 18) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 0018554238 19) Name: Mead & Hunt, Inc. Principal Investigator 20) First Name: Teresa 21) MI: F22)ast Name: Schuller 23) Suffix: 24) Title: Drinrinnl invnctinafnr [_nnfart Infnrmatinn 25) P.O. Box: load 26) Street Address: 400 Tracy Way Suite 200 27) City: Charleston 28) State: WV 29) Zip Code: 25311 30) Telephone Number: (681)313-4617 P31)F,,mber: 32) E-mail Address: teresa.schuller@meadhunt.com 1 of 19 FCC Fomn 620 Prnfecclnnal Dualifiration 33) Does the Principal Investigator satisfy the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards? I (X )yes ( ) No 34) Areas of Professional Qualification: ( } Archaeologist ( ) Architectural Historian ( ) Historian ( ) Architect ( X ) Other (Specify) environmental 35) Are there other staff involved who meet the Professional Qualification Standards of the Secretary of the Interior? ( X ) Yes ( ) No If "VPC " rmmniata the fnilnwinn- 36) First Name: Diana 37) MI: 38) Last Name: Welling 39) Suffix: 40) Title: 41) Areas of Professional Qualification: ( ) Archaeologist ( X ) Architectural Historian ( ) Historian { ) Architect ( ) Other (Specify) 36) First Name: Justin 37) Mt: 38) Last Name: Zink 39) Suffix: 40) Title: 41) Areas of Professional Qualification: { X ) Archaeologist ( ) Architectural Historian { ) Historian ( ) Architect ( ) Other (Specify) 2 of 19 FCC Form 620 Site Information ower Construction Notification System 1)TCNS Notification Number: 129587 Sifn Infnrmafinn 2) Positive Train Control Filing Subject to Expedited Treatment Under Program Comment: ( ) Yes ( X ) t o 3) Site Name: Hollins Road (VAROHRI ) 4) Site Address: Hollins Road 5) Detailed Description of Project: 6) City: Roanoke 7) State: VA 8) zip Code: 24019 9) County/Borough/Parish: ROANOKE 10) Nearest Crossroads: Hollins Road and Lois Lane (AKA Carlos Drive) 11) NAD 83 Latitude (DD-MM-SS.S): 37-19-44.9 ( X )Nor ( ) S 12) NAD 83 Longitude (DD-MM-SS.S): 079.55-32.5 ( ) E or ( X ) W Tower Information 13) Tower height above ground level (include top -mounted attachments such as lightning rods): 60.7 ( ) Feet ( X ) Meters 14) Tower Type (Select One): ( ) Guyed lattice tower ( ) Self-supporting lattice ( X } Monopole ( ) Other (Describe): arojecs otaius 15) Current Project Status (Select One): ( X ) Construction has not yet commenced ( ) Construction has commenced, but is not completed Construction commenced on: ( ) Construction has been completed Construction commenced on: Construction completed on: 3 of 19 FCC Fonu 620 a ._-. - A ❑PtPrmination of Effect 94) Direct Effects (Select One): ( ) No Historic Properties in Area of Potential Effects (APE) ( ) No Effect on Historic Properties in APE ( X ) No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on one or more Historic Properties in APE 15) Visual Effects (Select One): ( ) No Historic Properties in Area of Potential Effects (APE) ( ) No Effect on Historic Properties in APE ( X ) No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on one or more Historic Properties in APE 4 of 19 FCC Form 620 Tribal/NHO involvement ............ 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the API=s for direct and visual ( X ) Yes ( ) No effects? 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: 129587 Number of TribeslNHOS: 5 2b) Tribes/NHOS contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: 0 I riDelNHV Contacted i nrou n I i N5 3) TribelNHO FRN: 4) TribelNHO Name: Catawba Indian Nation Cultural Preservation Project Contact Name 5) First Name: Dr. Wenonah 6) MI: G 7) Last Name: Haire 8) Suffix: 9)Title: THPO and Executive Director LIMUZ, a F%WJF VIMW 10) Date Contacted 0713012015 11 } Date Replied ( X } No Reply ( } Replied/No Interest ( } Replied/Have Interest ( } Replied/Other TribelNHO Contacted t nrougn I UN5 3) TribelNHO FRN: 4) TribelNHo Name: Delaware Nation Contact Name 5) First Name: Nekole 6) MI: T Last Name: Alligood 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Cultural Preservation Director uates & rtes onse 10) Date Contacted 07/30/2015 11) Date Replied ( X ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( } Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other 5 of 19 FCC Form 620 Tribal/NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual ( X ) Yes ( } No effects? 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: 129557 Number of Tribes/NHOs: 5 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: 0 i rinerNHU t;ontactea i nrou n i ,ima 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) TribelNHO Name: Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma Contact Name 5) First Name: Robin 6) MI: 7) Last Name: Dushane 8) Suffix: 9) Title: THPO Oates & rtesponse 10) Date Contacted 07/30/2015 11) Date Replied 07/3112015 { ) No Reply { ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( X ) Replied/Other Trib@1NHU GontaMOCI i nrou n I tans 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Shawnee Tribe Contact Name 5) First Name: Kim 6) MI: 7) Last Name: Jumper T8) Suffix: 9) Title: THPO uates a rtes once 10) Date Contacted 07130/2015 11) Date Replied { X ) No Reply { } Replied/No Interest ( } Replied/Have Interest ( } Replied/Other 6 of 19 PCC Form 620 Triba[/NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual ( X ) Yes ( ) Na effects? 2a) TribeslNHOs contacted through TONS Notification Number: 129587 Number of Tribes/NHOs: 5 2b) TribeslNHOS contacted through an alternate system: Number of TribeslNHOS: fi f nDG1NMV C:ontactea I nrou n 1 t;fYS 3) Tribe/NHO FIRM 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Tuscarora Nation Contact Name 5) First Name: Leo 6) MI: R 7) Last Name: Henry T8) Suffix: 9) Title: Chief nates & Kesponse 10) Date Contacted 0713012015 11) bate Replied ( X ) No Reply ( ) RepliedlNo Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other 7 of 19 FCC t'onu 620 A 1-1 1111 Other Tribes/NHOs Contacted Tri be1N HO I nfermatie n 1) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 2) Name: Cnntart Names 3) First Name: 4) MI: 5) Last Name: 6) Suffix: 7) Title: f'-#-+ Inf_r fln 8) P.O. Box: And 9) Street Address: 10) City: 11) State: 12) Zip Code: 13) Telephone Number: 14) Fax Number: 15) E-mail Address: 16) Preferred means of communication: ( ) E-mail ( ) Letter ( ) Both Dates & Response 17) Date Contacted 18) Date Replied ( } No Reply ( ) Replied[No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other 8 of 19 FCC Form 620 R T-.. 1A 4 A Historic Properties 1) Have any historic properties been identified within the APES for direct and visual effect? ( X ) Yes ( ) No 2) Has the identification process located archaeological materials that would be directly affected, or sites that are of { )yes ( X ) No cultural or religious significance to Tribes/NHOs? 3) Are there more than 10 historic properties within the APES for direct and visual effect? { )yes ( X ) No If "Yes", you are required to attach a Cultural Resources Report in lieu of adding the Historic Property below. listoric Property 4) Property Name: Mountain View School 5) SHPO Site Number: 080-0393 Property Address 6) Street Address: Lois Lane 7) City: Roanoke 8) State: VA 9) Zip Code: 24019 10) CountylBorough/Parish: ROANOKE Css..a p C1. iMiirfar 11) Is this property listed on the National Register? Source: ( ) Yes ( X ) No 12) Is this property eligible for listing on the National Register? Source: ( ) Yes ( X ) No 13) Is this property a National Historic Landmark? ( ) Yes ( X ) No 14) Direct Effects (Select One): ( X ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 15) Visual Effects (Select One): ( X ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE { ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE { ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 9 of 19 FCC Form 620 Historic Properties PrnnarHac Irlanfifiarl 1) Have any historic properties been identified within the APEs for direct and visual effect? ( X ) Yes ( ) No 2) Has the identification process located archaeological materials that would be directly affected, or sites that are of ( ) Yes ( X ) No cultural or religious significance to Tribes/NHOs? 3) Are there more than 10 historic properties within the APES for direct and visual effect? ( ) Yes ( X ) No If "Yes", you are required to attach a Cultural Resources Report in lieu of adding the Historic Property below. Istoric Property 4) Property Name: Andrew Huff House 5) SHPO Site Number: 080-0015 Property Address 6) Street Address: Rt 601 7) City: Roanoke 8) State: VA 9) Zip Code: 24019 10) County/Borough/Parish: ROANOKE C4a+110 R 1:11nihili4tr 11) Is this property listed on the National Register? Source: ( )Yes ( X ) No 12) Is this property eligible for listing on the National Register? Source: CRM denotes demolished in 2006 ( X ) Yes ( ) No 13) Is this property a National Historic Landmark? ( ) Yes ( X ) No 14) Direct Effects (Select One): ( X ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 15) Visual Effects (Select One): ( X ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( } No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 16 of 19 FCC Force 620 Historic Properties Prn11PMac Irlantiflarl 1) Have any historic properties been identified within the APES for direct and visual effect? ( X ) Yes ( ) No 2) Has the identification process located archaeological materials that would be directly affected, or sites that are of ( )Yes (X ) No cultural or religious significance to Tribes/NHOs? 3) Are there more than 10 historic properties within the APES for direct and visual effect? ( )yes ( X ) No If "Yes", you are required to attach a Cultural Resources Report in lieu of adding the Historic Property below. istoric Property 4) Property Name: Christian Nininger house 5) SHPO Site Number: 080-0034 Property Address 6) Street Address: Plantation Road Rt 118 7) City: Roanoke 8) State: VA 9) Zip Code: 24019 10) County/Borough/Parish: ROANOKE Qf2fl e R plinihilihr 11) Is this property listed on the National Register? Source: ( ) Yes ( X ) No 12) Is this property eligible for listing on the National Register? Source: potentially eligible based upon DHR review on 917193 ( X ) Yes ( ) No 13) is this property a National Historic Landmark? ( ) Yes ( X ) No 14) direct Effects (Select One): ( ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( X ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 15) Visual Effects (Select One): ( ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( X ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE I 1 of 19 FCC Form 620 aA....•.l A Historic Properties Prnnprtiac IripntifiPti 1) Have any historic properties been identified within the APES for direct and visual effect? { X ) Yes ( ) No 2) Has the identification process located archaeological materials that would be directly affected, or sites that are of { )Yes (X ) No cultural or religious significance to Tribes/NHOs? 3) Are there more than 10 historic properties within the APES for direct and visual effect? ( ) Yes ( X ) No If "Yes", you are required to attach a Cultural Resources Report in lieu of adding the Historic Property below. listoric Property 4) Property Name: House 5) SHPO Site Number: 080-0394 Property Address B) Street Address: Lois Lane 7) City: roanoke 8) State: VA 9) Zip Code: 24019 10) CountylBoroughlParish: ROANOKE SfAhic R Plinihilifu 11) Is this property listed on the National Register? Source: ( ) Yes ( X ) No 12) Is this property eligible for listing on the National Register? Source: ( )yes ( X ) No 13) Is this property a National Historic Landmark? ( ) Yes ( X ) No 14) Direct Effects (Select Ono): ( X ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 15) Visual Effects (Select One): ( X ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 12 of 19 FCC Form 620 x e__. — R Historic Properties PrnnerflPg IdP_ntifirnd 1) Have any historic properties been identified within the APES for direct and visual effect? ( X ) Yes ( ) No 2) Has the identification process located archaeological materials that would be directly affected, or sites that are of ( )Yes (X ) No cultural or religious significance to Tribes/NHOs? 3) Are there more than 10 historic properties within the APEs for direct and visual effect? "Yes", ( ) Yes (X ) No If you are required to attach a Cultural Resources Report in lieu of adding the Historic Property below. istoric Property 4) Property Name: House 5) SHPO Site Number: 080-0406 roperoperty Address 6) Street Address: Old Mountain Road 7) City: Roanoke 8) State: VA 9) Zip Code: 24019 10) CountylBoroughlParish: ROANOKE Statim R Plinihility 11) Is this property listed on the National Register? Source: ( ) Yes ( X ) No 12) Is this property eligible for listing on the National Register? Source: ( )Yes ( X ) No 13) Is this property a National Historic Landmark? ( ) Yes ( X ) No 14) Direct Effects (Select One): ( X ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 15) Visual Effects (Select One): ( X ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 13 of 19 FCC Fomi 620 r. A... 1n 3 A Historic Properties Drn..nrFinc Irinnfifinel 1) Have any historic properties been identified within the APEs for direct and visual effect? { X )yes ( ) No 2) Has the identification process located archaeological materials that would be directly affected, or sites that are of { )yes ( X ) No cultural or religious significance to Tribes/NHos? 3) Are there more than 10 historic properties within the APES for direct and visual effect? { ) Yes ( X ) No If "Yes", you are required to attach a Cultural Resources Report in lieu of adding the Historic Property below. Istoric Property 4) Property Name: Rudd House 5) SHPO Site Number: 080-0417 Property Address 6) Street Address: Plantation Road 7) City: Roanoke 8) State: VA 9) Zip Code: 24019 10) CountylBoroughlParish: ROANOKE Y. C1lnlhflli., 11) Is this property listed on the National Register? Source: ( )yes ( X ) No 12) Is this property eligible for listing on the National Register? Source: eligible by OHR evaluation committee on 919193 ( X ) Yes ( ) No 13) Is this property a National Historic Landmark? ( ) Yes ( X ) No 14) Direct Effects (Select One): ( ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( X ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE { ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 15) Visual Effects (Select One): ( } No Effect on this Historic Property in APE { X } No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( } Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 14 of 19 FCC Foran 620 Local Government Involvement -ocai government Agency 1) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 2) Name: Roanoke County Planning and Zoning Commission Contact Name 3) First Name: Wayne 4) MI: 5) Last Name: Bower 6) Suffix: 7) Title: 8) P.O. Box: 29800 IO d 9) Street Address: 10) City: Roanoke 11) State: VA 12) Zip Code: 24018.0798 13) Telephone Number: (540)772-2006 P14)F,,mber: 15) E-mail Address: wbower@roanokecountyva.gov 16) Preferred means of communication: ( X )E-mail ( ) Letter ( ) Both Dates & Response 17) Date Contacted 07/3012015 18) Date Replied 07/30/2015 ( ) No Reply { ) Replied/No Interest { ) Replied/Have Interest ( X) Replied/Other No reposne yet. Their response, if any, will be uploaded to this application. 19) Information on local government's role or interest (optional): Planning commission for this area. 15 of 19 FCC Form 620 w A--. i n t A Local Government Involvement -ocai Government 1) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 2) Name: History Museum of Western Virginia Contact damp 3) First Name: Linda 4) MI: 5) Last Name: Steele 6) Suffix: 7) Title: L`nn+aM infnrmn inn 8) P.D. Box: PO Box 1940 /Ord 9) Street Address: 1o) City: Roanoke 11) State: VA 12) Zip Code: 24008 13) Telephone Number: (540)342.5770 P14)FxNmber 15) E-mail Address: registrar@vahistorymuseum.org 16) Preferred means of communication: ( X) E-mail ( ) Letter { ) Both )ates u 17) Date Contacted 07/30/2015 18) Date Replied 07/30/2015 { ) No Reply { ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( X) Replied/Other No rely yet. Their response, if any, will be uploaded to this application. Additional Information 19) Information on local government's role or interest (optional): local historical group 16 of 14 FCC Font 620 R —. 1A 1 A Other Consulting Parties utner Consuiting Parties Contacted 1 }Has any other agency been contacted and invited to become a consulting party? { }Yes ( X } No 2) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 3) Name: Contact Name 4) First Name: 5) Ml: 6) Last Name: T7) Suffix: 8) Title: 9) P.O. Box: 10 d 10) Street Address: 11) City: 12) State: 13) Zip Code: 14) Telephone Number: 15) Fax Number: 16) E-mail Address: 17) Preferred means of communication: ( ) E-mail { ) Letter ( } Both )ates & Response 18) Date Contacted 19) Date Replied ( } No Reply { ) RepliedlNo Interest ( ) Replied/Nave Interest { ) Replied/Other Arlrlitinnal Information 20) Information on other consulting parties' role or interest (optional): 17 of 19 FCC Form 620 Designation of SHPOITHPO 1) Designate the Lead State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) or Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO) based on the location of the tower. SHPO/THPO Name: Virginia Department of Historic Resources 2) You may also designate up to three additional SHPOsITHPOs if the APES include multiple states. If the APES include other countries, enter the name of the National Historic Preservation Agency and any state and provincial Historic Preservation Agency. SHPO/THPO Name: SHPO/THPO Name: SHPOITHPO Name: Certification certify that all representations on this FCC Form 620 Submission Packet and the accompanying attachments are true, correct, and complete. Party Authorized to Sign First Name: Teresa MI: Last Name: Schuller Suffix: Signature: Teresa Schuller Date: 08/05/2015 FAILURE TO SIGN THIS APPLICATION MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE APPLICATION AND FORFEITURE OF ANY FEES PAID. WILLFUL FALSE STATEMENTS MADE ON THIS FORM OR ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND/OR IMPRISONMENT (U.S. Code, Title 18, Section 1001) AND/OR REVOCATION OF ANY STATION LICENSE OR CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (U.S. Code, Title 47, Section 312(a)(1)), AND/OR FORFEITURE (U.S. Code, Title 47, Section 503). 18 of 19 FCC Poen 620 Attachments : Type ResumesfVitae Map Documents Area of Potential Effects Tribal/NHO Involvement Local Government Involvement Local Government Involvement Public Involvement Historic Properties for Direct Effects Historic Properties for Visual Effects Photographs Cultural Resources Report Tribal/NHO Involvement Public Involvement Historic Properties for Visual Effects Description Date Entered 3 resumes 07/30/2015 site clan 07130/2015 Topo map with APE 07/30/2015 TONS 129587 07/30/2015 historical society reeauesl letterino attachments 07/30/2015 Roanoke Co Planning commission reouest/no 07/3012015 attachments Leaal act for Roanoke Times 07/30/2015 Fuil arch report 07/3012015 Visual effects portion of report 0713012015 site photos 07/30/2015 Full Cultural Rsources report 07130/2015 Notice of Organizations - THPOs 08/05/2015 Affidavit far legal notice 08/05/2015 Additionai Informatoin on Visih ity 08/05/2015 19 of 19 FCC Font 620 %/_._-A Meed Ilural, Im M e a d Ai & EI Ar( hlEv kov. Ili- 1011lra,y YY.ry, Wile 211!1 p 311'r,iVlfl;lllL,>>31I \\ lunt04-31', �W I1 „..,,n}Ilfll ,.l„ 5 August 2015 Additional Information requested on Views of Tower from Historic Structures Hollins Road Tower Site, Roanoke, VA A 30 July 2015 email from the FCC for this tower's e -Farm 620 filing requested balloon test photos form these structures showing that the tower will not be visible. Based upon the architectural historian's site visit, most of these sites are in dense woods, which preclude a balloon launch. The ones are on private land, for which we do not have access. To address the question of visibility, Mead & Hunt prepared line -of -sight profiles (which not account for buildings or trees/vegetation) with Google Earth maps. The structures and comments are: 080-0393 — demolished 080-0015 - demolished 080-0394 — dense trees immediately surrounding; tower not visible 080-0406 — dense trees immediately surrounding; tower not visible 080-0417 -- large barn/outbuilding and mature trees screen the view 080-0034 — barely touched the approximate boundary line. The boundary is a row of mature trees and a small ridge block the view. These profiles and Google maps were provided to the historian who indicated that the results substantiated the statements already made in the cultural resources report. 1300 125 1200 1150 1100 c 1050 0 ital distance: 1597 feet •ound distance: 1610 feet Miles Climbing: 64 feet Elevation change: -30 feet Descending: -95 feet Min/Max: 1030/1096 Line -of -site figure for 080-0394. Software does not include trees or other vegetation. Proposed cell tower will not be visible from this resource due dense woods surrounding the property (see attached Google Earth shot). Tree height is typically between 60-80 ft in mature forest. Go sic earth feet 200 Illp- meters 80 Google Earth Proposed cell due to dense difficult to shot for 080-0394. tower will not be visible forest closely surrounding locate the property. from this resource the property. It was C;Ok,glearth feet 200 meters $0 Google Earth shot for 080-0394. Proposed cell tower will not be visible from this resource due to dense forest closely surrounding the property. It was difficult to locate the property. 1300 1250' 1200 1150 1100 1050} dal distance: 'ound distance Miles 1231 feet Climbing: 101 feet Elevation change: 98 feet Descending: -2 feet Min/Max: 1061/1159 1239 feet Line -of -site figure for 080-0406. Software does not include trees or other vegetation. Proposed cell tower will not be visible from this resource due dense woods surrounding the property (see attached Google Earth shot). Tree height is typically between 60-80 ft in mature forest. Google eath feet 600 meters 100 jlr Google Earth Proposed cell due to dense difficult to shot for 080-0405. tower will not be visible from this resource forest closely surrounding the property. It was locate the property. 12501 1200' 1150 1100 C 1050 100th Miles ftai distance: 2686 feet Climbing: 137 feet Elevation change: 32 feet Descending: -105 feet Min/Max: 1009/1100 -ound distance: 2707 feet Line -of -site figure for 080-0417. Software does not include trees or other vegetation. Proposed cell tower will not be visible from this resource due larger outbuilding screening its view as well as the trees near the house (see attached Google Earth shot). Tree height is typicall between 60-80 ft in mature forest. i proposed tower N. - direction ~ r Owl n Its i Alt '4W r •� l r 0�2�1 5 Google " - �,," Go ( I - ear Goosle earth 1300 1250 1200 1150 1100 1050 0 Ral distance: 2926 feet 'aund distance: 2945 feet Miles Climbing: 111 feet Elevation change: -29 feet Descending: -140 feet Min/Max: 1026/1106 Line -of -site figure for 080-0034. Software does not include trees or other vegetation. Proposed cell tower will not be visible from this resource due to the small ridge blocking the view. Appendix D THPO Clearance Letters Phase I Archaeology Survey Report Mead & Hunt, 1uc. R4021600-155994.01 Teresa Schuller From: Sent: To: Subject: Dear Teresa A Schuller, towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Friday, July 24, 2015 12:58 PM Teresa Schuller Proposed Tower Structure Info - Email ID #4291520 Thank you for submitting a notification regarding your proposed construction via the Tower Construction Notification System. Note that the system has assigned a unique Notification ID number for this proposed construction. You will need to reference this Notification ID number when you update your project's Status with us. Below are the details you provided for the construction you have proposed: Notification Received: 07/24/2015 Notification ID: 129587 Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: Apex Towers Consultant Name: Teresa A Schuller Street Address: 400 Tracy Way, Suite 200 City: Charleston State: WEST VIRGINIA Zip Code: 25311 Phone: 681-313-4617 Email: teresa.schuller@meadhunt.com Structure Type: MTOWER - Monopole Latitude: 37 deg 19 min 44.9 sec N Longitude: 79 deg 55 min 32,5 sec W Location Description: Hollins Road City: Roanoke State. VIRGINIA County: ROANOKE Detailed Description of Project: Proposed construction of a 199 -ft (including 4 -ft Iightning rod) monopole tower and equipment shelter within a 100 -ft by 100 -ft. ]eased area. Access road and utility corridor will be constructed. Ground Elevation: 317.7 meters Support Structure: 59.4 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 60.7 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 378.4 meters above mean sea level Teresa Schuller From: towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 3:01 AM To: Teresa Schuller Cc: Jonathan.Jonas@fcc.gov; diane.dupert@fcc.gov Subject: NOTICE OF ORGANIZATIONS) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWER CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION INFORMATION - Email ID #4293142 Dear Sir or Madam: Thank you for using the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System (TONS). The purpose of this electronic mail message is to inform you that the following authorized persons were sent the information you provided through TCNS, which relates to your proposed antenna structure. The information was forwarded by the FCC to authorized TCNS users by electronic mail and/or regular mail (letter). Persons who have received the information that you provided include leaders or their designees of federally - recognized American Indian Tribes, including Alaska Native Villages (collectively "Tribal Nations"), Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs), and State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPOs). For your convenience in identifying the referenced Tribal Nations and NHOs and in making further contacts, the City and State of the Seat of Government for each Tribal Nation and NHO, as well as the designated contact person, is included in the listing below. We note that Tribal Nations may have Section 106 cultural interests in ancestral homelands or other locations that are far removed from their current Seat of Government. Pursuant to the Commission's rules as set forth in the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic Properties for Certain Undertakings Approved by the Federal Communications Commission (NPA), all Tribal Nations and NHOs listed below must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to respond to this notification, consistent with the procedures set forth below, unless the proposed construction falls within an exclusion designated by the Tribal Nation or NHO. (NPA, Section IV.F.4). The information you provided was forwarded to the following Tribal Nations and NHOs. If a Tribal Nation or NHO does not respond within a reasonable time, you should make a reasonable effort at follow-up contact, unless the Tribal Nation or NHO has agreed to different procedures (NPA, Section IV.17.5). In the event a Tribal Nation or NHO does not respond to a follow-up inquiry, or if a substantive or procedural disagreement arises between you and a Tribal Nation or NHO, you must seek guidance from the Commission (NPA, Section IV.G). These procedures are further set forth in the FCC's Declaratory Ruling released on October 6, 2005 (FCC 05- 176). 1. Cultural Preservation Director Nekole Alligood - Delaware Nation - Anadarko, OK - regular mail Details: The Delaware Nation located in Anadarko, Oklahoma charges a $500 administrative fee for the review of ALL projects. (Change Effective 5121/2013). Send fee payable to the Delaware Nation in the form of a check or money order. All projects for review by the Delaware Nation must pay the $500 fee. Please note that the Delaware Nation and the Delaware Tribe of Indians ARE NOT the same enitity. Send all correspondence for the Delaware Nation to The Delaware Nation ATTN: Cultural Preservation Department 31064 State Hwy 281 Anadarko, OK 73005. 2. Chief Leo R Henry - Tuscarora Nation - Via; Lewiston, NY - regular mail Details: If the Applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Tuscarora Nation within 30 days after notification through TCNS, the Tuscarora Nation has no interest in participating in pre -construction review for the site. The Applicant/tower builder, however, must IMMEDIATLY notify the Tuscarora Nation in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction. 3. THPO Robin Dushane - Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma - Wyandotte, OK - regular mail Details: NOTE: CHANGE IN CONSULTATION PROCEDURES AND FEE The Cultural Preservation Office of the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma requires the following information and fees regarding all proposed FFC projects. Please do not email documentation; it will be deleted without being opened. Mail one printed color copy of all documentation accompanied with a CD version. Please submit by US postal mail or other parcel carrier all of the following information for all FCC projects: 1. A 1 -page cover letter with the following information: a) TCNS number b) Company name c) Project name, city, county, state d) Project type e) UTM coordinates using WGS84 (G1150) f) Total area surveyed in acres g) Contact information. 2. Professional cultural/archaeological resource survey report. 3. Aerial and color USGS topographic maps locating project area within the state, county, and local area. 4. Aerial, color USGS topographic, or planimetric maps locating tower site, APE, access road, utility easement, guy wire locations surveyed, surveyed staging areas, and known archaeological/historic sites. 5. Project site plan map depicting labeled shovel test locations. 6. Shovel test log. 7. Site photographs. 8. A copyof the review letter or TCNS e -response from the State Historic Preservation Office and all other state -mandated review offices. 9. Submit a $550.00 per/tower fee for administration, data processing, handling, research, and review. Collocations, PTC poles, and projects in previously disturbed locations require a $100.00 fee. Make the check payable to the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma. On the memo line write all TCNS numbers. NOTE: Effective November 1, 2014, for TCNS #119606 and forward, regarding collocations, PTC poles, and projects in previously disturbed locations; the administration, data processing, handling, research and review fee will decrease to $100.00. 10. THE EASTERN SHAWNEE TRIBE'S NEW CONSULTATION PROCEDURES DOCUMENT is availableby email and is highly recommended for guidance. Send an email to Dee Gardner at: celltower@estoo.net. If the applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma within 30 days after notification through TCNS, the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma has no interest in participating in pre -construction review for the proposed site. The Applicant/tower builder, howeve r, must immediately notify the Eastern Shawnee Trine of Oklahoma in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction, consistent with Section IX of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement and applicable law. 4. THPO Kim Jumper - Shawnee Tribe - Miami, OK - regular mail Details: THIS IS YOUR OFFICIAL NOTICE THAT THE SHAWNEE TRIBE IS INTERESTED IN CONSULTING ON ALL PROJECTS BUILT IN OUR AREAS OF GEOGRAPHIC INTEREST. ATTENTION, NEW INFORMATION: Our procedures were updated on 14 January 2008. Please call Kim Jumper, THPO, at 918-542-2441, so that she can send you a copy. If your tower is a co -location, please fax us this information to let us know. We cannot always tell from the TCNS web site that a tower is a co -location. We require a written response from you to let us know that it is a co -location. If a co -location project includes some new ground disturbance (such as from an expanded compound or access road, or construction of an ancillary structure), the Shawnee Tribe treats such a project the same as any other non co -location project. Our correct mailing/physical address is: 29 South Highway 69A. Our correct phone number is (918-542-2441) and our historic preservation fax line is (918-542-9915). THPO Kim Jumper manages all cell tower consultation. As of 26 June2006, all of the faxed responses of our final comments on a tower site will contain an original Shawnee Tribe signature. Each final comment fax is signed individually. Copies may be compared, for authentication, against the original in our files.If afinal comment fax does not contain a signature, it is not valid. ALL FINAL COMMENTS FROM THE SHAWNEE TRIBE ARE WRITTEN; FINAL COMMENTS ARE NEVER PROVIDED VERBALLY. IF THE SHAWNEE TRIBE IS CREDITED WITH HAVING GIVEN A VERBAL RESPONSE, THAT RESPONSE IS NOT VALID. If you receive notification through the TCNS listing the Shawnee Tribe, that is an indication that the Shawnee Tribe is interested in consulting on the tower for which that notification was received. Please consider that our official indication of interest to you. The Shawnee Tribe considers the Tower Construction Notification System's weekly e-mail to be the first notification that we receive that a tower will be constructed in an area of our concern. We do not view the TCNS notificationas completion of 106 consultation obligations. The Shawnee Tribe has developed streamlined consultation procedures for cell tower developers and their subcontractors. If you do not have a copy of the procedures - most recently updated on 14 January2008 - please contact us, as you must follow these procedures to consult with us on cell tower projects. Call us at 918-542- 2441 or fax us at 918-542-9915. It is the tower builder's responsibility to make sure that you have our most recent consultation procedures. PLEASE DO NOT SEND US INFORMATION, QUERIES, OR COMMENTS ELECTRONICALLY. SINCE 1 DECEMBER 2005, WE HAVE NOT HANDLED ANY CELL TOWER CONSULTATION, INQUIRIES, OR CORRESPONDENCE VIA E-MAIL. 5. THPO and Executive Director Dr. Wenonah G Haire - Catawba Indian Nation Cultural Preservation Project - Rock Hill, SC - electronic mail and regular mail Details: The Catawba Indian Nation Tribal Historic Preservation Office requests that you send us by regular mail the following information needed to complete our research for your proposed project (including ALL Positive Train Control (PTC) projects): Project Name 4 Project Num 1. The name, complete address, phone number, fax number and e-mail address of the project manager. 2. The project location plotted on a topo map. 3. The project name, address and location; street or highway, city, county, state. 4. A brief description of the proposed project. Please include the size of the proposed project site and the size of the area where ground -disturbing activities will be taking place and the type of disturbance anticipated. 5. A brief description of current and former land use. We are primarily interested in ground disturbance and do not need detailed information orphotographs of historic structures in the projectarea. 6. A list of all recorded archaeological sites within one half (112) mile of the project area. 7. A list of all eligible and potentially eligible National Register of Historic Places sites within one half (112) mile of the proposed project area. 8. If there has been an archaeological survey done in the area, a copy of that report. 9. It is not necessary to send original color photos if you can provide high-resolutioncolor copies. 10. A letter of concurrence from the appropriate State Historic Preservation Office. If you use the FCC Form 620, please do not send Attachments 1 through 6. They are not necessary for our determination. We do not have an interest in projects that require no ground disturbance. Please note: Our research/processing fee is $400. Please send these requested materials in hard copy format. Send to: CIN-THPO 1536 Tom Steven Road Rock Hill, S.C. 29730 The information you provided was also forwarded to the following SHPOs in the State in which you propose to construct and neighboring States. The information was provided to these SHPOs as a courtesy for their information and planning. You need make no effort at this time to follow up with any SHPO that does not respond to this notification. Prior to construction, you must provide the SHPO of the State in which you propose to construct (or the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, if the project will be located on certain Tribal lands), with a Submission Packet pursuant to Section VILA of the NPA. 6. Environmental Review Coordinator Renee GledhillEarley - NC State Historic Preservation Office - Raleigh, NC - electronic mail 7. Deputy SHPO David Brook - Historic Preservation Office - Raleigh, NC - electronic mail 8. Manager - Office of Review & Compliance Ethel R Eaton PhD - Department of Historic Resources - Richmond, VA - electronic mail 9. Deputy SHPO Susan Pierce - West Virginia Division of Culture & History, Historic Preservation Office - Charleston, WV - electronic mail 10. Director Julie Langan - Virginia Department of Historic Resources - Richmond, VA - electronic mail "Exclusions" above set forth language provided by the Tribal Nation or SHPO. These exclusions may indicate types of PTC wayside pole notifications that the Tribal Nation or SHPO does not wish to review. TCNS automatically forwards all notifications to all Tribal Nations and SHPOs that have an expressed interest in the geographic area of a proposal. However, if a proposal falls within a designated exclusion, you need not expect any response and need not pursue any additional process with that Tribal Nation or SHPO. Exclusions may also set forth policies or procedures of a particular Tribal Nation or SHPO (for example, types of information that a Tribal Nation routinely requests, or a policy that no response within 30 days indicates no interest in participating in pre -construction review). Please be advised that the FCC cannot guarantee that the contact(s) listed above opened and reviewed an electronic or regular mail notification. The following information relating to the proposed tower was forwarded to the person(s) listed above: Notification Received: 07/24/2015 Notification ID: 129587 Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: Apex Towers Consultant Name: Teresa A Schuller Street Address: 400 Tracy Way, Suite 200 City: Charleston State: WEST VIRGINIA Zip Code: 25311 Phone: 681-313-4617 Email: teresa.schuller@meadhunt.com Structure Type: MTOWER - Monopole Latitude: 37 deg 19 min 44.9 sec N Longitude: 79 deg 55 min 32.5 sec W Location Description: Hollins Road City: Roanoke State: VIRGINIA County: ROANOKE Detailed Description of Project: Proposed construction of a 199 -ft (including 4 -ft lightning rod) monopole tower and equipment shelter within a 100 -ft by 100 -ft. leased area. Access road and utility corridor will be constructed. Ground Elevation: 317.7 meters Support Structure: 59.4 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 60.7 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 378.4 meters above mean sea level If you have any questions or comments regarding this notice, please contact the FCC using the electronic mail farm located on the FCC's website at: http://wireless.fcc.gov/outreach/notification/contact-fcc.html. You may also call the FCC Support Center at (877) 480-3201 (TTY 717-338-2824). Hours are from 8 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday (except Federal holidays). To provide quality service and ensure security, all telephone calls are recorded. Thank you, Federal Communications Commission 7 mmw4fm MEAD & HUNT ARCHITECTURE INC Alin TERESA A. SCHULLER 400 TRACY WAY SUITE 200 CHARLESTON, WV 25311 The Roanoke Times Roanoke, Virginia Affidavit of Publication Account Number 6039077 [Date 771 August 01, 2015 Date Category Description Ad Size Total Cost 08/07/2015 legal Notices PUBLIC NOTICE CONSTRUCTION OF TELECOMMUNICATH 1 x 40 L 252.40 Newspaper reference: 0000158216 �-Oto(vt)4(Y�Lj C I-- - Billing Re resentative Sworn to and subscribed before me this Saturday, August 1, 2015 I, i+ rl dd, 7 / e �1� .' Notary ub iC 0.0101 +llf) State of Virginia00 P •• �Y ' City/County of RoanokeI C . �. puOXI � - My Commission expires = F=G 41337gSh 1tJ15S1d� lI f Gip ' / -410 . THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU 'f,,�ftFEA.0\ " Publisher of the PUBLIC NOTICE CONSTRUCTION OF Roanoke Times TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWER I, (tire undersigned) an authorized representative of the Apex Towers is providing notice of itG Intent to construct and o Roanoke Times a daily newspaper published in Roanoke, in the pursuant tel era! COMTu Ic tower pursuant to lc Agr Commission's Federal met[. for Programmatic Aorer. State of Virginia, do certify that the annexed notice PUBLIC T tele COfll lled ollinsA iron tP(VARbHRJL) is The touter . (37 19t NOTICE CONSTRUCTIO was published in said newspaper's on the 5119 Hollins Road' Roanoke. VA 44 9O and 7p 55 32.47.5W) The monopola tower -111 be 299 feet following dates: (Including 4 -root llghtning rod) in height Only comments regarding potent lar effects on Historic Properties should be sent within 30 days Of publication to - Teresa A. Schuller 08101/2015 Mood & Hunt, Inc 400 Tray Way, 5ulte 200 c Charleston, WV 25311 Phone; 681-313-4617 Far: 304/345-6714 T o resa-sc hu I l erOm—eadhunt,cn m (196216) The First insertion being given ... 08/01/2015 Newspaper reference: 0000158216 �-Oto(vt)4(Y�Lj C I-- - Billing Re resentative Sworn to and subscribed before me this Saturday, August 1, 2015 I, i+ rl dd, 7 / e �1� .' Notary ub iC 0.0101 +llf) State of Virginia00 P •• �Y ' City/County of RoanokeI C . �. puOXI � - My Commission expires = F=G 41337gSh 1tJ15S1d� lI f Gip ' / -410 . THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU 'f,,�ftFEA.0\ " NACD Query Results Full Data Report Query input: State = Virginia County = Roanoke NO RECORDS FOUND MATCHING SEARCH CRITERIA IofI ,fhe Delaware Nation -- Cultural Preservation Department 31064 State Highway 281 Anadarko, OK 73005 Phone (405)247-2448 Fax (405) 247-8905 Director ext. 1403 Section 106 ext. 1181 Library ext, 1196 Culture ext. 1180 GIS/GPR ext. 1405 To Whom It May Concern: The Delaware Nation Cultural Preservation Department received correspondence regarding the above project. Our office is committed to protecting sites important to tribal heritage, culture and religion. Furthermore, the tribe is particularly concerned with archaeological sites that may contain human burials or remains, as associated funerary objects. As described in your correspondence and upon research of our database(s) and files we find that the Lenape people occupied this area either prehistorically or historically. However, the location of the project does not endanger cultural or religious sites of interest to the Delaware Nation. Please continue with the project_as planned. However, should this project inadvertently uncover an archaeological site or object(s), we request that you halt all construction and ground disturbance activities and immediately contact the appropriate state agencies, as well as our office (within 24 hours). Please note the Delaware Nation, the Delaware Tribe of Indians, and the Stockbridge Munsee Band of Mohican Indians are the only Federally Recognized Delaware/Lenape entities in the United States and consultation must be made only with designated staff of these three tribes. We appreciate you cooperation in contacting he Delaware Nation Cultural Preservation Office to conduct proper Section 106 consultation. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact our offices at 405/247-2448 ext. 1181 or by email: 'ross delawarenation.conr. Lf za� Jason Ross Section 106 Program Manager The Delaware Nation 31064 State Highway 281 Anadarko, OIC 73005 Mead & Hunt ATTN: Teresa Schuller 400 Tracy Way, Suite 200 Charleston, WV 25311 EASTERN SHAWNEE TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA 12755 S. 705 Road, Wyandotte, SOK 74370 Bluejacket Building (918) 666-2435, Fax: 888-971-3905 RE: Cell Tower Project Hollins Road, Roanoke, Roanoke County, VA TCNS 129587 September 14, 2015 Dear Ms. Schuller, The Cultural Preservation Department of the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma (ESTO) has received the documentation for Mead & Hunt's proposed telecommunications project, Hollins Road, located at UTM Zone 17, 595175 m E, 4131926 m N (WGS84) in/near Roanoke in Roanoke County, VA. ESTO has reviewed the project, TCNS 129587, in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). Based on the information provided and a review of our records, we find that No Historic Properties of sacred and/or cultural significance to the Tribe will be impacted by this project. Therefore, ESTO has no objection to the project proceeding as described; however, please note that any future changes to this project may require additional consultation. In accordance with the NHPA of 1966 (16 U.S.C. § 470-470w-6), federally funded, licensed, or permitted undertakings that are subject to the Section 106 review process must determine effects to significant historic properties, As clarified in Section 101(d)(6)(A-B), historic properties may have religious and/or cultural significance to Indian Tribes. Section 106 of NHPA requires Federal agencies to consider the effects of their actions on all significant historic properties (36 CFR Part 800) as does the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (43 U.S.C. § 4321-4347 and 40 CFR § 1501.7(a). This letter evidences NHPA and NEPA historic properties compliance pertaining to consultation with this Tribe in regard to the proposed project referenced as Hollins Road, TCNS 129587. However, if during construction cultural objects or human remains are inadvertently discovered, please stop work immediately and contact the Cultural Preservation Department of the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma. Thank you for consulting with the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma. i R�Dushane Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Jenniferf§igler Tribal Archaeologist SHAWNEE TRiIBE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEPARTMENT 29 SOUTH HIGHWAY 69A MIAMI, OKLAHOMA 74354 918,16642,6,-2441 PHONE 918,1k542"9916 FAX FACSIMILE OVER PAGE ►►► i i i i i i♦ i►►► ►► ►► i►►► i i i► i►► i i►► i► i i i♦ i i► .► i l i i► i FIRMIAGENCY: �1 Y inP1l4]A.. * 9 11 ts± FAx NUMBER' ��V"1 - 3 " PHONE NUMBER: FRom: KIM JUMPER DATE/TIME: 91 1. t NO, OF PAGES, INCLUDING COVER: MEMO: i oC"1! o t C1.1<<.T1L�i:Z I iii ii iiia i►►►♦iii I&A AL, ►►ii►IS, ii i►►►A i.A►►ii►i►i i►i►i i Message: The Shawnee Tribe's Tribal Historic Preservation Officer concurs that no known historic properties will be negatively impacted by construction of this tower site (see memo line above for TCNS numberls). The Shawnee Tribe's archives do not reveal any issues of concern at this tower location, In the event that archaeological materials are encountered later during construction, use, or maintenance of this tower location, please re -notify us at that time as we would like to resume consultation under such a circumstance. The Shawnee Tribe's Environmental and Natural Resources Department takes this opportuntty to express Its concerns that telecommunication towers can have a potentially destructive impact on bats and migratory birds, particularly those that migrate at night, including species listed as threatened and endangered by both states and the federal government, as well as other species. The Shawnee Tribe suggests that this tower be constructed in accordance with the guidelines available from the US Fish and Wildlife Service to reduce the adverse effects of telecommunications towers on migratory birds; these guidelines may be found at; www.fwa.gov/migratorybirds/issues/towers/Comtow.htmi. The Shawnee Tribe's Environmental and Natural Resources Department is further concerned that the proliferation of cell towers may play a role in honey bee Colony Collapse Disorder. We acknowledge that cell phone technology may not be to blame, especially by itself, as other potential causative factors for the decline have been noted, such as insecticides, tracheal and varroa mites (an immunosuppressant), other parasites, pesticides used on hives to eliminate parasites, genetically modified plants, Nosema fungus, Israeli Acute Paralysis Viris (IAPV) perhaps. introduced from Australia in 2404, Kashmir Bee Virus [K -13M, climate change, and drought. Finally, the Shawnee Tribe's Environmental and Natural Resources Department requests that cell Mower sites, whenever remotely feasible, be restored to native vegetation. In all cases, habitat restoration can protect a variety of species, even in small project areas. The large number of cell tower sites provides an as yet unrealized opportunity for region -wide habitat restoration. The Tribe urges the cell phone industry to provide a model for native habitat restoration for other industries. Please do not hesitate to tali us for additional comment. Catawba Indian Nation Tribal Historic Preservation Office 1536 Tom Steven Road Rock Hill, South Carolina 29730 office 803-328-2427 Fax 803-328-5791 September 9, 2015 Attention: Teresa A. Schuller Mead & Hunt, Inc. 400 Tracy Way, Suite 200 Charleston, WV 25311 Re. THPO # TONS # Project Description 2015-570-10 129587 Ho{lins luau Raw Land Site in Roanoke Co., VA Project No. R4021600455994.0T Dear Ms. Schuller, The Catawba have no immediate concerns with regard to traditional cultural properties, sacred sites or Native American archaeological sites within the boundaries of the proposed project areas. However, the Catawba are to be notified if Native American artifacts and ! or human remains are located during the ground disturbance phase of this prosect. The research and processing fee for each project is $400. For accounting purposes, checks must be made otit to the Catawba Indian Nation THP© (CIN-THPO). If you have questions please contact Caitlin Totherow at 803-328-2427 ext. 226, or e- mail caitlinh@ccpperafts.coni. Sincerely, Wenonah G. Haire Tribal JJistoric Preservation Officer PN: 15-0559 July 29, 2015 PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SURVEY FOR THE PROPOSED HOLLINS ROAD (VAROHR1) WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS TOWER IN ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA By: Justin Zink, M.A. Diana Welling, M.H.P. Brett Carmichael Prepared for: Mead & Hunt, Inc. 400 Tracy Way, Suite 200 Charleston, West Virginia 25311 Prepared by: Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 1441 King Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43212 614-481-8600 (office) 614-481-8610 (fax) 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia Phase I Cultural Resource Management Survey for the Proposed Hollins Road (VAROHR1) Wireless Communications Tower in Roanoke County, Virginia by Justin Zink, M.A. Diana Welling, M.H.P. Brett Carmichael Submitted By: Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 1441 King Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43212 VOICE: (614) 481-8600 FAX: (614) 481-8610 www.lawhon-assoc.com Submitted To: Mead & Hunt, Inc. 400 Tracy Way, Suite 200 Charleston, West Virginia 25311 Lead Agency: Federal Communications Commission �i"0z Justin Zink, M.A. July 29, 2015 Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia 0.1 ABSTRACT In July of 2015 Lawhon & Associates, Inc. (L&A) completed a Phase cultural resource management survey for the proposed Hollins Road (VAROHRI) Wireless Communications Tower in Roanoke County, Virginia. The work was conducted for Mead & Hunt, Inc., as a part of the permitting process for the Federal Communications Commission. The proposed project consists of the construction of a wireless communications tower on the north side of Roanoke in a small industrial area between the suburb of Hollins and the Read Mountain Preserve in Roanoke County, Virginia. The project is located off of Carlos Drive behind (south of) a commercial building between the Norfolk Southern railroad to the east and Hollins Road to the west in a wooded flat. The tower project consists of a lease limits, and a utility easement within an access corridor. The lease limits is 50 feet by 50 feet (15 m by 15 m), encompassing an area of 0.06 acres (0.02 hectares). The proposed tower is a monopole tower that will be 195 feet (59 m) tall. The elevation at the center of the tower lease limits is 1,076 feet (328 m) above mean sea level. The proposed access corridor/utility easement for the tower comes south off of Carlos Drive and bends slightly west to the lease limits south of the existing building. This corridor is approximately 365 feet (111 m) long by 20 feet (6 m) wide. The literature review and Area of Potential Effect (APE) for visual effects are considered a 0.5 mi (0.8 km) radius from the tower location. There are no previously recorded NRHP properties or districts located within the study radius. There are three previously recorded archaeological sites, six architecture resources, and three previous surveys located within the study radius. The fieldwork for the project was conducted on July 22, 2015. The survey involved subsurface testing and visual inspection of the project and failed to recover any artifacts that were 50 years or older. The literature review identified one potentially eligible and two eligible architecture resources within the study radius. Due to the mostly obscured views because of wooded topography and modern intrusions and the defining characteristics that potentially qualify or did qualify the resources for listing in the NRHP themselves, the proposed undertaking will have No (direct or indirect) Adverse Effect on Historic Properties. Therefore, no further cultural resource work is recommended for the project at this time. Lawhon & Associates, Inc. Ili 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road 0.2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 1.0 2.0 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 4.0 4.1 5.0 5.1 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 Roanoke County, Virginia ABSTRACT........................................................................................................ III TABLE OF CONTENTS...................................................................................IV LIST OF FIGURES............................................................................................ V LISTOF TABLES.............................................................................................. V LIST OF PHOTOS............................................................................................. V INTRODUCTION................................................................................................ 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING.......................................................................... 2 RESEARCH DESIGN........................................................................................ 3 Archaeological Field Methods........................................................................ 3 Artifact Analysis Methods................................................................................ 4 CurationMethods.............................................................................................4 PredictiveModel............................................................................................... 4 Project Specific Predictive Model.................................................................. 5 LITERATURE REVIEW..................................................................................... 6 Research Questions 1-2 Discussion.............................................................7 RESULTS OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY (APE FOR DIRECT EFFECTS)........................................................................................................... 8 Research Questions 3-4 Discussion............................................................. 9 RESULTS OF THE HISTORY ARCHITECTURE SURVEY (APE FOR VISUAL EFFECTS)............................................................................................ 9 AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS................................................................. 11 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS................................................................. 12 REFERENCES.................................................................................................. 13 FIGURES........................................................................................................... 14 PHOTOS............................................................................................................ 23 Lawhon & Associates, Inc. iv 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia 0.3 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: County Map with an Overview of Virginia .................................................. 15 Figure 2: Modern Topographic Map............................................................................ 16 Figure3: Project Plans.................................................................................................. 17 Figure 4: V -CBIS Map Showing Previously Recorded Cultural Resources and Surveys............................................................................................................................ 18 Figure 5: 1933 Roanoke, Virginia 15' Series Topographic Map ............................. 19 Figure 6: Fieldwork Schematic with Photo Orientations .......................................... 20 Figure 7: Typical Test Unit Profile and Photograph .................................................. 21 Figure 8: Aerial Map Showing Architecture Resources within the Study Radius 22 0.4 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Soils encountered within the project............................................................. 3 Table 2. Hollins Road Subsurface Testing................................................................. S 0.5 LIST OF PHOTOS Photo 1: View from the center of the lease limits facing north ................................ 24 Photo 2: View from the center of the lease limits, facing east ................................ 24 Photo 3: View from the center of the lease limits, facing south .............................. 25 Photo 4: View from the center of the lease limits, facing west ............................... 25 Photo 5: View of the landform containing the lease limits and of a portion of the utility easement/access corridor.................................................................................. 26 Photo 6: View of the conditions encountered within the shovel tested aspect of the utility easement/access corridor............................................................................ 26 Photo 7: View of the visually disturbed northern terminus of the utility easement/access corridor............................................................................................. 27 Photo 8: Another view of the visually disturbed northern terminus of the utility easement/access corridor from Carlos Drive............................................................ 27 Lawhon & Associates, Inc. v 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia 1.0 INTRODUCTION Under contract with Mead & Hunt, Inc., Lawhon & Associates, Inc. has completed a Phase I cultural resource management survey for the proposed Hollins Road (VAROHRI) Wireless Communications Tower in Roanoke County, Virginia (Figure 1). The work was conducted for Mead & Hunt, Inc., as a part of the permitting process for the Federal Communications Commission. The investigations for this project were conducted in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended in 1992, U.S.C. 470f. The standards and guidelines for the survey efforts are presented in the Archaeology and Historic Preservation: Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines (1985). The document is congruent with the standards established by the Advisory Council of Historic Preservation and the new Section 106 (36 CFR Part 800) regulations that went into effect on January 11, 2001. The federal standards and guidelines are supplemented by the procedures presented by the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (Virginia Department of Historic Resources 2011 a and 2011 b). The proposed project consists of the construction of a wireless communications tower on the north side of Roanoke in a small industrial area between the suburb of Hollins and the Read Mountain Preserve in Roanoke County, Virginia. The project is located off of Carlos Drive behind (south of) a commercial building between the Norfolk Southern railroad to the east and Hollins Road to the west in a wooded flat (Figures 2-3). The tower project consists of a lease limits, and a utility easement within an access corridor. The lease limits is 50 feet by 50 feet (15 m by 15 m), encompassing an area of 0.06 acres (0.02 hectares). An additional 25 foot buffer area was examined on all sides of the lease limits. The proposed tower is a monopole tower that will be 195 feet (59 m) tall. The elevation at the center of the tower lease limits is 1,076 feet (328 m) above mean sea level. The proposed access corridor/utility easement for the tower comes south off of Carlos Drive and bends slightly west to the lease limits south of the existing building. This corridor is approximately 365 feet (111 m) long by 20 feet (6 m) wide. The footprint of all proposed construction disturbance was subjected to survey. Justin Zink completed the literature review for the project on July 20, 2015. The fieldwork was completed on July 22, 2015 by Brett Carmichael (field technician) and Justin Zink, who also served as the Principal Investigator. Brett Carmichael has over 7 years' experience performing archaeological and history/architecture surveys across several states, has a BA in History and English from Cedarville University (2001), and is attending Youngstown State University in pursuit of a M.A. in History focusing on Historic Architecture within the Historic Preservation sequence. Justin Zink has over 12 years' experience performing archaeological and history/architecture surveys across several states, has a BA in Anthropology from Ohio University (2003), a MA in Anthropology from The Ohio State University (2009), and has authored/coauthored over 450 Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 1 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia CRM publications in Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, New Jersey, and Indiana. A total of three hours were spent on site for the fieldwork and photographic documentation. The project was both staked and flagged at the time of survey. 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The environmental setting is presented to contextualize the cultural investigations within the natural environment. Since much of prehistoric activity was based either directly or indirectly on the surrounding environment, its presentation here contributes to the understanding of the types of prehistoric behaviors that may have been exhibited by the inhabitants of a particular prehistoric site. Historic sites were also subject to both environmental and geographical conditions which affected the function of a site, its social status, and/or its productivity (amongst other factors). Understanding the environmental setting is a key element in understanding a variety of archaeological site characteristics. The climate in Roanoke County is considered continental, having relatively cold winters and hot summers. The annual precipitation in the county is approximately 40 inches, with January being the driest month August being the wettest month [U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conversation Service (USDA, SCS) 1997]. Roanoke County is located in the Valley and Ridge physiographic province (Bailey 1999a). The city of Roanoke and the project area specifically are within the Great Valley sub -province. Mason Creek, Tinker Creek, Carvin Creek, and Back Creek, Bottom Creek and their tributaries are the principal drainages in the county, which are part of the Roanoke Rivershed; the northern part of the county is drained by the James River watershed via Catawba Creek. Both these rivers drain to the Chesapeake Bay. The project is drained by an unnamed tributary of Tinker Creek. The geological bedrock of Roanoke County, north of the city of Roanoke including the project, consists of carbonate rocks. The bedrocks in the majority of the county are part of the Cambrian, Ordovician- Silurian, and Devonian - Mississippian systems. The sedimentary rocks found in the county are dolomite, limestone, sandstone, quartz sandstone, shale, and shale with minor gypsum and coal (Bailey 1999b). There are two specific soils encountered within the project (Table 1) [United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA, NRCS) 2015]. Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 2 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Rollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia Tnhlo I Cnilc cnrntintprarl within thA nrnlP_Ct_ Soil Soil Name - - - Slope Landform Symbol Percentage 49B Turn Ang loam 2-7 Fans — footslo e 49C Tumbling loam 7-15 t=ans — footslo e 3.0 RESEARCH DESIGN This research design presents a framework within which the Phase I survey was conducted. The purpose of the Phase I survey is to identify any cultural resources that will be affected by the proposed project. The cultural resources potentially affected include both archaeological deposits and architectural resources 50 years or older. Once the cultural resources are identified, this information will be used to evaluate each archaeological site/historic resource for characteristics of integrity and significance, which are important factors in determining the NRHP eligibility of each site/resource. Integrity is evaluated according to aspects of integrity: location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. Aspects of integrity are discussed elsewhere (Little et al. 2000) and are not repeated here. Significant information and sufficient site integrity to yield further significant information must both be present to make a site eligible for the NRHP. If sufficient data cannot be obtained during the Phase I survey to determine whether the site is eligible or not, then further, more intensive work may be recommended to answer any remaining questions. The Phase I survey is designed to answer the following set of questions in regards to the project: • Has the project been subjected to previous CRM investigation and are there any previously recorded sites/resources located within or immediately adjacent the project? • What is the likelihood of identifying previously unrecorded cultural resources within the project? • Will the proposed project affect any cultural resources (archaeological or above ground structures)? • If cultural resources will be affected, are any of those affected resources listed, eligible, or potentially eligible for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places? 3.1 Archaeological Field Methods Two methods of investigation were utilized during this Phase I survey: visual inspection and shovel test unit excavation. Visual Inspection The entire surveyed area was visually inspected to identify readily apparent archaeological resources, such as mounds, earthworks, and building or structural remnants. The visual inspection also was used to document areas of obvious disturbance, steep slope, and to document any inundated areas (i.e. wetlands, streams, ponds, etc.). The visual inspection transects were spaced maximally at 5 meter intervals across the surveyed area. Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 3 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia Shovel Test Unit Excavation In areas with less than 15 degrees of slope and poor ground surface visibility (less than 50%), systematic shovel test unit excavation took place. Shovel test units (STU) were excavated at 49.2 ft (15 m) intervals in transects spaced 49.2 ft (15 m) apart. Each unit measured 19.7 inches (50 cm) square in size. The walls and floor of each unit were troweled clean to determine the depth of the plow zone and if in situ cultural remains were present. All soil from each STU was screened through 0.25 inch (0.64 cm) hardware cloth by soil horizon to aid in the recovery of any cultural material present. Notes were then taken on the soil color, texture, depth, and the presence or absence of artifacts. If artifacts or features were encountered, a field site number was assigned. Shovel tests units were excavated deep enough to sample all soils that could potentially contain cultural materials. Per the Virginia Department of Historic Resources guidelines (Virginia Department of Historic Resources 2011), shovel test units were excavated "to sterile subsoil' and then an extra 10 cm into the sterile subsoil to verify the lack of cultural remains. Field notes recorded additional information such as field conditions, methods of investigation, STUs, sites, etc. Similar notes will be taken for any site encountered, recording location, size, methods of investigation, etc. The location of any site recovered will be documented using a GPS receiver. Photographs of the project area were taken as deemed appropriate. A record of the photographs was kept in a photo -log and keyed to project mapping. 3.2 Artifact Analysis Methods There was no prehistoric or historic cultural material recovered for this project. Hence, there were no laboratory methods followed and none are presented here. 3.3 Curation Methods There were no cultural resources identified during the survey. The field notes and other materials affiliated with the project will be stored at Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 3.4 Predictive Model A predictive model developed for cultural resource surveys is an excellent tool that can help guide fieldwork efforts based on prior research. The predictive model can help to understand the probability of recovering archaeological deposits within a project, as well as allowing the researcher inter -site comparisons to other sites within the region. While predictive models can become quite complex, the level of complexity should be relative to the type of project. The current undertaking consists of a communications tower with a lease limits and utility easement/access corridor. These constructions have a relatively limited construction footprint and small area of potential ground Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 4 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia disturbance. Due to the small, simple nature of the project, a straightforward predictive model for both historic and prehistoric deposits was generated. During prehistory, land use was generally tied to key characteristics of the environmental setting and local terrain. These characteristics included, but were not limited to proximity to reliable resources (flora and fauna), landform elevation, distance to water, environmental diversity, closeness to trails and other unique settings. Unique environmental settings included rock shelters, caves, waterfalls, swamps, rises on floodplains, and traversable mountainous terrain. Locales with several key characteristics lent themselves to longer term occupations and larger habitations. Upland settings that were further removed from waterways were utilized more logistically (i.e. seasonal hunting, resource procurement, etc.) and witnessed a more mobile subsistence strategy. During the span of prehistory, land use and subsistence changed relative to resource availability and procurement strategies. Population density increased and the introduction of horticulture/agriculture increased the need for a more territorial strategy. Regionalism increased and larger populations settled in village settings tied to crop production and a larger, fertile floodplains, especially during the Woodland era. During the historic era, occupations continued the reliance on key environmental characteristics for settlement locations started during the prehistoric period. Early settlers concentrated on stream valleys, the confluence of rivers, and along trail/supply routes. These occupations were often positioned in the same areas utilized by Native Americans. The time period and occupation of the residents affected the duration and density of settlement. Settler farmsteads were positioned close to springs and near mills. As the historic period progressed, occupations moved to the upland interior and residences were positioned along roadways. Residences were often situated on the elevation within view of the closest thoroughfare for a better presentation of the property. Parcel and lot boundaries predicated the location of the residence as well. Beyond residential settlement, historic period deposits can be affiliated with Civil War battlefields and forts. Certain environmental settings were specifically selected for battle sites, while others were areas where opposing forces incidentally came into contact and engaged each other. Skirmishes occurred and are somewhat more poorly recorded than larger battles. Many of these locations have been documented on maps and written histories. Beginning in the 19th century and continuing through the modern era, residences and various other constructions are mapped on atlases and recorded in legal deeds. 3.5 Project Specific Predictive Model The project consists of a small cell tower lease limits and utility easement/access corridor. The project is located in a relatively non-descript upland foot slope setting removed from the floodplain along Tinker Creek and just beyond the steep side slope of Read Mountain to the east. The project is northeast of the city of Roanoke and southeast of the community of Hollins. The Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 5 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia project is surrounded by large commercial/industrial concerns and the remaining single family residences that have yet to be removed for development. The surrounding setting is relatively wooded as well. There are no residences older than 50 years indicated within the parcel containing the cell tower. Access to the site is from Carlos Drive which terminates nearby into Hollins Road. Large, modern residential developments are located to the south and west of the project area. The terrain is relatively flat and the conditions include immature forestation with dense undergrowth. The project is east of Tinker Creek by nearly 0.32 miles. Disturbance from an active railroad corridor is located immediately to the east of the project as well. There are no distinct topographic settings that would indicate an increased likelihood of prehistoric or historic occupation within the project. The environmental setting and landform suggest a low probability of recovering substantial cultural materials. Historic atlases do not indicate the former presence of any buildings or structures within or adjacent the project area. There are no Civil War activities recorded in the general vicinity of the project either. 4.0 LITERATURE REVIEW The FCC has previously defined the literature review study area for tower projects based on the overall height of the construction. The study area and the Area Potential Effects (APE) for visual effects are the same and set as a 0.5 miles (0.8 kilometer) radius from the tower center point. The Nationwide Programmatic Agreement (NPA) defines the APE for visual effects as "112 of a mile from the tower site is the proposed tower is 200 feet or less in height" (NPA with the FCC regarding Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act [Section VI, C., 4., b]). The following sources were examined through the Virginia Department of Historic Resources on the Virginia -Cultural Resource Information System (V-CRIS) website, and various online resources: 1) USGS 7.5' and 15' series topographic maps associated with the project; 2) DHR Archaeological Site Inventory forms; 3) DHR Architectural Site and Structures Inventory forms; 4) National Register of Historic Places (NRNP) files; 5) DHR Library of Cultural Resource reports; 6) Civil War Maps 7) Roanoke County atlases and histories Upon review of the USGS 7.5' series topographic maps through the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, there are no previously recorded archaeological sites located in the project, but three identified at the edge of the study radius. 44RN0003 is a large open site identified by an amateur collector via surface collection. The only temporal affiliation for the site comes from the identification of Archaic Era projectile points but the site form broadly dates the site from 15,000 BC — AD 1606. 44RN0311 is known also as the Hinman Site Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 6 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia and given two date ranges, 3,000-1,201 BC and AD 1000-1606 based on radiometric dates. It is an open air camp, at which Louis Berger & Associates completed a data recovery salvage excavation in 1998. The site contained lithic artifacts, ceramic artifacts, pit features, hearth features, a set of features indicating a structure, and a burial. 44RN0312 is the remains of a barn, its foundation and some associated refuse dating from AD 1875-1899. The V-CRIS Architecture Resource files did not indicate any previously recorded resources within the project, but identified six within the study radius: 080-0015, 080-0034, 080-0393, 080-0394, 080-0406, 080-0417. Three of the architecture resources (080-0393, 080-0394, 080-0406) were not determined eligible or potentially eligible for the NRHP. Two of the resources (080-0015, 080-0417) were considered eligible by DHR and one resource (080-0034) was considered potentially eligible. There are no NRHP properties or districts identified within the project or within the study radius. A review of the Contract Cultural Resource Management reports failed to identify any previous surveys that impacted the proposed project, but identified two previous Phase I surveys within the study radius (RN -021 and RN -048). Also, the Phase III survey for 44RN0311 is just on the edge of the study radius (Rinehart et al. 2000). There were no Civil War related resources (Potential NR areas, Study Areas, Core Areas) identified within the study radius. A number of historic plat maps and topographic maps were inspected to see if any structures formerly existed within or adjacent to the project and who the previous landowners were for the property on which the project is located. The USGS 9933 Roanoke, Virginia 15' series topographic map (Figure 4) does not indicate any structures within or immediately adjacent the project. The USGS 1963 Roanoke, Virginia 7.5' series topographic map (Figure 2) does not indicate any structures within or immediately adjacent the project. 4.1 Research Questions 1-2 Discussion Now that the background research had been conducted for the project, the first two research questions regarding the relationship of previous surveys and previously recorded sites/resources to the proposed project and the likelihood of encountering previously recorded cultural resources within the proposed project can be addressed. The literature review did not indicate that the proposed project had been subjected to prior survey, nor were there any previously documented cultural resources located within the project. Within the study radius however, there had been two surveys, three archaeological sites, and six architecture resources. Based on this information it is considered possible that prehistoric period archaeological sites may be encountered within the project on the landforms better suited to occupation (i.e. relatively higher and well drained areas). Historic period remains are considered unlikely within the project since the historic Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 7 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia atlases failed to indicate any structures or other known historic activities located within or adjacent the proposed project. 5.0 RESULTS OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY (APE FOR DIRECT EFFECTS) The fieldwork for the project was conducted on June 21St of 2015 by Justin Zink and Brett Carmichael. The weather on the day of survey was sunny and seasonable (80° F). The fieldwork involved archaeological survey of the lease limits and a utility easement/access corridor. The lease limits is approximately 50 feet by 50 feet (15 m by 15 m), encompassing an area of 0.06 acres (0,02 hectares). The lease limits is located on an immature wooded lot with dense undergrowth behind a large commercial building (Figure 6; Photos 1-5; Table 2). The southwestern corner of the lease limits was used as the datum for the fieldwork strategy. The lease limits was relatively flat and subsurface tested with a total of five shovel test units. The shovel test units were excavated within Tumbling loam (49B). The topsoil was generally a dark reddish brown (5YR312) loam that ranged in depth from 20-26 cmbs, with the subsoil being a reddish brown (5YR514) loam (Figure 7). Since a total of five shovel test units were excavated throughout the lease limits, the 25 foot buffer area was visually inspected. There were no archaeological deposits identified within the lease limits. The proposed utility easement/access corridor heads southwest from Carlos Drive along the edge of a disturbed railroad corridor then arcs west to the lease limits (Figure 6; Photos 5-8). This corridor is approximately 365 feet (111 m) long by 20 feet (6 m) wide. The northern approximately 30 feet of the corridor along Carlos Drive was located within fill disturbance associated with the adjacent roadway and railroad crossing intersection. This area consisted of approximately 6-8 feet of fill soil, was covered in modern trash and debris (plastic bottles, tires, misc. trash, etc.), and was visually inspected. The remaining majority of the easement was located within the same flat, wooded conditions with dense undergrowth encountered within the lease limits and subsurface tested. The shovel test units (n=5) were relatively intact, which was surprising given the easement's proximity to the large commercial building and railroad corridor. Some mottling was witnessed in the top 10 cm of topsoil; however intact subsoil was identified within the shovel test units. There were no archaeological deposits identified within the utility easement/access corridor. Tahia 9 Nnllinc Road Riffisurface Testing T.U. # Provenience Soils `^ Topsoil Depth Cultural Resources 1 0,0 Tumblin loam 49B 24 cm Negative 2 0, 50E Tumbling loam 4913 20 cm Ne ative 3 Center Tumbling loam 4913 22 cm Negative 4 50N, 0 Tumbling loam 496 24 cm Negative 5 50N, 50E Tumblin loam 49B)_26 cm Negative 6 A.C. 1 Tumbling loam 496 20 cm Negative Lawhon & Associates, Inc. $ 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia 7 A.C. 2 Tumbling loam 4913 23 cm Negative 8 A.C. 3 Tumbling loam 49C 21 cm Negative 9 A.C. 4 Tumbling loam 49C 22 cm Negative 10 A.C. 5 Tumbling loam 49C 20 cm Negative 5.1 Research Questions 3,4 Discussion Now that the fieldwork is complete for the project, the second two research questions can be addressed; those questions regarding whether the proposed project will affect any cultural resources and if so, are those affected resources listed, eligible, or potentially eligible for the NRHP. There were no artifacts 50 years or older identified during the archaeological survey; therefore no eligible or listed NRHP properties will be impacted within the APE for direct effects. 6.0 RESULTS OF THE HISTORY ARCHITECTURE SURVEY (APE FOR VISUAL EFFECTS) Diana Welling and Brett Carmichael evaluated potential impacts to the history/architecture resources within the APE for visual effects on July 27th of 2015. The purpose of the history/architecture survey was to determine if the proposed project will impose visual impacts upon any history/architecture resources within the APE that are listed on, or eligible for, the National Register of Historic Places. According to the V -CBIS online GIS system, within the 0.5 mile study radius for the proposed tower site, there are no National Historic Landmarks, NRHP districts, or NRHP properties. There were six (6) previously identified architecture resources. Three of the architecture resources (080-0393, 080-0394, 080-0406) were not determined eligible or potentially eligible for the NRHP. Two of the resources (080-0015, 080-0417) were considered eligible by DHR and one resource (080-0034) was considered potentially eligible by DHR. Each resource is discussed below (Figure 8; Appendix A). 080-0393 This resource is demolished. The Mountain View School was a one story school house from the Consolidation Era at the beginning of the 20th Century. The building was a one -bay, one-story wood framed building with a side gabled standing metal seam roof and a brick foundation. Since the building has been demolished, there is no impact to the resource by the proposed wireless communications tower. 080-0394 The dwelling at 5249 Lois Lane was inaccessible for the purpose of this report due to its location at the end of a long drive, off the road, near Tinker's Creek. According to its DHR form, the two-story, single -pen dwelling is constructed of logs and dates to c. 1830. Though that places it in the Antebellum Period, there is no discernable architectural style associated with the house. This resource is not evaluated for inclusion status. It is approximately 1,600 feet (485m) from the proposed tower site, but there is a large mound of fill dirt on the parcel between the proposed tower and the low, heavily wooded stream -edge Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 9 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia where the old abandoned house is located. Due to the nature of the resource and visual screening by woods and modern intrusions, the proposed wireless communications tower will not impact any of the characteristics of the resource that would make it potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. 080-0406 The dwelling at 5524 Old Mountain Road was inaccessible for the purpose of this report due to its location out of view of public right of way. According to the DHR form, the parcel includes a ca. 1891 wood -framed single family dwelling and several outbuildings. No architectural style is included on the form and the resource is not evaluated for NRNP inclusion status. It is located approximately 1,252 feet (382m) from the proposed tower site, but the landscape between is completely wooded except for the tall, metal -towered electric easement and the railroad corridor that each pass between the resource and the proposed tower location. Due to the nature of the resource and visual screening by wooded topography and modern intrusions, the proposed wireless communications tower will not impact any of the characteristics of the resource that would make it potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. 080-0015 Though this resource was evaluated and recommended as NRHP eligible, it was demolished in 2006. The property was known as the Andrew Huff House, the Bellegrove Farm, the Stokes Farm, and the Lewis Huff House. It was a ca. 1870 Greek Revival style dwelling located at 5621 Plantation Road. Since the dwelling has been demolished, there is no impact to the resource by the proposed wireless communications tower. 080-0034 Barely clipped by the study radius for this project, is the parcel boundary of 6103 Plantation Road. The 30 -acre parcel is currently known as "Meadowbrook," but historically was known as "Walnut Grove." Built in 1866, DHR staff has evaluated this property as potentially eligible for NRHP inclusion. The dwelling maintains the Flemish bond brick on its exterior that was a hallmark of local bricklayer David Deyerle. The interior is central passage and its form is double pile. Since the dwelling is located outside of public right of way view, back a long driveway, it was inaccessible for photographing or further analyzation. The dwelling itself is approximately 2,864 feet (0.54 mi) from the proposed tower site, but the parcel extends to the edge of the 0.5 mi study radius (Figure 8). The landscape between the resource and the proposed tower location is a mixture of woods and suburban development including office buildings and single family residences. The dwelling is down in the stream valley, with two wooded ridges obscuring its surrounding viewshed, and the general loss of historic setting in the area, this resource will not be detrimentally impacted by the proposed tower. Due to the nature of the resource and visual screening by wooded topography and modern intrusions, the proposed wireless communications tower will not Lawhon & Associates, inc. 10 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia impact any of the characteristics of the resource that would make it potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. 080-0417 Originally owned by William P. Huff and called "Windy Hill," this domestic single dwelling was later owned by Walter Rudd and called "Windmere." DHR Staff have evaluated this property as Eligible for National Register inclusion. The large, suburban, Late Victorian house is located at 5415 Plantation Road but has been unoccupied since the early 1970s. Original construction took place ca. 1880, and the roofline is cross -gabled with three additional gables extruding at right angles, but not symmetrically. This indicates a Late Victorian era house in a Folk Victorian or some transitional Gothic form. Several reviewers have styled this house a Queen Anne on its resource form and its decor might instruct that, however, for this survey the house was inaccessible as it sits far back a private drive at 5415 Plantation Road and photographs and closer physical analysis were unattainable. Again, this resource itself is more than a half -mile from the proposed tower location; approximately 2,775 feet (846 m), but the parcel boundary extends to catch the edge of the 0.5 mi study radius (Figure 8). The landscape between the resource and the proposed tower location is a mixture of woods and suburban development including a huge industrial distribution center and some single family residences. Further obscuring the resources' view of the tower is a 1965 mechanics garage built on the east side of the resources' parking lot, 40 feet (12 m) away. With the obstruction of its surrounding viewshed, and the general loss of historic setting in the area, this resource will not be detrimentally impacted by the proposed tower. Due to the nature of the resource and visual screening by woods and modern intrusions, the proposed wireless communications tower will not impact any of the characteristics of the resource that would make it eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. 7.0 AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS According to the NPA, the Area of Potential Effects (APE) is defined as "the geographic area or areas within which an Undertaking may directly or indirectly cause alterations in the character or use of Historic Properties, if any such properties exist". There are two types of APE that must be taken into consideration during tower surveys, the APE for direct effects and the APE for visual effects. While conducting the archaeological survey, the APE for direct affects was considered. The APE for direct effects is "limited to the area of potential ground disturbance and any property, or any portion thereof that will be physically altered or destroyed by the Undertaking." The survey did not encounter any archaeological deposits older than 50 years, hence a determination of no historic properties within the APE for direct effects is deemed appropriate. The APE for visual effects is "the geographic area in which the Undertaking has the potential to introduce visual elements that diminish or alter Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 11 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Roam Roanoke County, Virginia the setting, including the landscape, where the setting is a character -defining feature of a Historic Property that makes it eligible for listing on the National Register." Within the Y2 mile APE for this proposed site, there were six previously identified historic resources identified during the Literature Review within the APE for visual effects. The potential visual im acts by the proposed project were assessed during the field survey on July 27t of 2015. Of these six, two lacked a determination of eligibility for inclusion to the NRHP (080-0394 and 080-0406), two were destroyed (080-0015 and 080-0393), and two are properties barely clipped by the study radius (080-0034 and 080-0417). Due to the mostly obscured views because of hilly terrain and commercial/industrial contexts between existing resources and the proposed tower, and the defining characteristics that potentially qualify the resources for listing in the NRHP themselves, the proposed undertaking will have No (direct or indirect) Adverse Effect on Historic Properties 8.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Under contract with Mead & Hunt, Inc., Lawhon and Associates, Inc. (L&A) completed a Phase I cultural resource management survey for the Hollins Road (VAROHRI) Wireless Communications Tower in Roanoke County, Virginia in July of 2015. The archaeological survey involved subsurface testing and visual inspection of the project and failed to recover any artifacts that were 50 years or older. The history/architecture survey for the APE for visual effects evaluated six (6) previously identified architecture resources. Due to the mostly obscured views because of wooded topography and the defining characteristics that potentially qualify or did qualify the resources for listing in the NRHP themselves, the proposed undertaking will have No (direct or indirect) Adverse Effect on Historic Properties. Therefore, no further cultural resource work is recommended for the project at this time. Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 12 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia 9.0 REFERENCES Bailey, C. 1999a Physiographic Map of Virginia. College of William and Mary. 1999b Simplified Geologic Map of Virginia. College of William and Mary. Little, Barbara, Erika Martin Seibert, Jan Townsend, John H. Sprinkle, Jr. and John Knoerl 2000 Guidelines for Evaluating and Registering Archaeological Properties, U.S. Department of the Interior. Rinehart, C.J. and et al. 2000 Ceramic Technology and Community Organization: Archaeological Data Recovery at the Hinman Site (44RN39 9), Roanoke County, Virginia. Louis Berger and Associates, Inc, Richmond. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service 2015 Web Soil Survey. Online Resource <http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/> United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 1997 Soil Survey of Roanoke County and the Cities of Roanoke and Salem, Virginia. USDA Soil Conservation Service in cooperation with the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Virginia Department of Historic Resources 2011 a Guidelines for Conducting Historic Resources Survey in Virginia. Richmond, Virginia. 2011 b Guidelines for the Submission and Review of FCC Projects. Richmond, Virginia Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 13 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 15-0559 Hollins Road 10.0 FIGURES Roanoke County, Virginia Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 14 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 C) C 40 U) ca W< a 0- 0 ly LU wo, IAS )VI pp-pdpgw 9 LL Mon 12 fit :3 (1) 0 0 0 > x 0 o LU 3 — U W CL G ! ; 79 O 0 2 '{ I� 0 7 J r CL Eu IL M LO a o 6 C14 C Y M 75 QP jt.■ L -.w- i ���},'` �.aa*• 1•••••' ... 1. or P • f - i. `yL � i. f++•f Ii ••+oaf• f�••+ff•f fa f .++�•f•• •ff � ,'� a_- ' +' •++J�+f •� a '•`• •• � 1 a. 10 tv ad MEW AL .0011, r go peso OF! • t, Allow '. • fr it i + . m•1 V� a ON ix i d tc N ` adr� Lf) rMIA L e Q Z3 U Ns d o m :'- d� •�- 2 d IiS. IV i � � � "� � W Edo � �. � —• Y i5 �e Li ' f g k los' ;N aiarl�5+n1 r - �' qvW!>cHniou oa�� C W',( n y yy FF2 pw�(ryy p � � �W2y G zI❑yam ~ p JJ -b pkly $hF yq=z 0 2L¢2� ��Siz hoz Fn��Vi�WSrrj�4�i����.I�� OFIN G�a rl'u03 2 Up Fu a¢o V a an Nz5aG7Wgg m_�u��z$ FHd F yyyyyy������ ppiiD wxca u].ii WEY No 21 : I QY r N '�• , �� IT 0 lVi , pip I ^ F 1 eye Y. ai G rn U� U A Q � tvv�JJ rA fir, asp A a PC E A a°viU .4113 013 LIO Q zQ � m cfl 11 4 rt-' ai •• o z U) z �- w z zo� a � O a w a � C cin o O Or � o o CL v O. q p N += co �¢ CL C ® ❑ � I a t� PA l J CA Q A Z w �C�lp4'7 pUjeCC 00 dq� �1 � zz$6 tx 3� J w L", c� z 9 to 7th ,- IVA) ; N • �1 / o xw IL \ wO1Lq \ a m04 LLI w - VG fi Il , to Ix� o E E w � LU Ck l J z ► I / w a \ �j 0-- Ear—ai'99 �G �T �� Cl: Ear a �x<t�R�1N� - - Car Q`—ES7-� EST �h�. ��,���co � EAT 4Y3 E6i HIQl11A 3078blNyN V 4 609 �AV011 SNR70M r' a IL a ao m w ti 0 v -T -- � m cfl 11 4 LO o z U) z �- w z zo� a �7w m M U (D a w .Q 0Ul w C cin U O D j 47 O Or � o CL 0 O. q p N += CL 7th ,- IVA) ; N • �1 / o xw IL \ wO1Lq \ a m04 LLI w - VG fi Il , to Ix� o E E w � LU Ck l J z ► I / w a \ �j 0-- Ear—ai'99 �G �T �� Cl: Ear a �x<t�R�1N� - - Car Q`—ES7-� EST �h�. ��,���co � EAT 4Y3 E6i HIQl11A 3078blNyN V 4 609 �AV011 SNR70M r' a IL a ao m w ti 0 v -T -- \ �\� 2 � .2 \§? � � e % § e \ k f = � 2 ƒ 0 Lo 2 2 §\ = Q & 1 � ƒ E .20 00 / §0[> o . a>n 0 o�� � , � . . ■. . a P ¢ A pr i . 6..- � � -.k � +. y`�"T CF 1. - - r -'it'. • 1 �. •� P 'r q r :� ^ 1r' .• � . • L 1/�� �, =t .f „+ . q gip!® rV �i 3N JD vs ' IP •�„ .,. � � �' �:.. �. •yam �¢J. I f' p l�• � Fh'iu�,�s,wPN , y IJ• JI - �, 1. ..Y .' 1 a a kl— t• �r * i i F u ve Pa PUIf! t 1 o A., iorjlz DefN.R •' ba4�.1BN e�`0 Ir ' J � rJ!� P18,M1 { _ 'S yl �• } � J. !" �~ ,� fir- T'y��4'�s� O��r� �•� ^F� � _ 1��, Y 3�#',�1i'� 4 t,y� k � � . �� i 15-0559 Hollins Road 11.0 PHOTOS Roanoke County, Virginia Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 23 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 i J, 44 hL 41 51 1 • Il., �.dr -'F, '"� y. M I'• .. �1 it "1 .IL WSJ i �; _ y Iwo I IL � • N fix• . >>G��'', � t.. � �> r fa > 7 . Awl 5 •. .i iii ��rf ,E r y !�s}' " WAV' ZIA "'hoto 7: View of the visually disturbed northern terminus of the utility easementlaccess corridor. 4 ! r i 15-0559 Hollins Road Roanoke County, Virginia APPENDIX A: Architecture Resource Forms from V-CRIS Lawhon & Associates, Inc. 28 1441 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43212 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 08 0-00 15 Architectural Survey Foran Other DHR ID: No Data Prprty Infor�natlon Property Names Property Evaluation Status Name Explanation Name Alleged Andrew Huff House DHR Staff: Fligible Historic Bellegrove Farm Current The Stokes Farm Historic/Current Lewis Huff House Property Addresses Alternate - Route 601 Alternate - Stokes Dr. Current - 5621 Plantation Road County/Independent City(s): Roanoke (County) Incorporated Town(s): No Dam Zip Code(s): 24019 Magisterial District(* No Dow Tax Parcel(s): 38.0813130 USGS Quad(s): ROANOKE Acdrtitinaltroprty Informs#Ioill Architecture Setting: Suburban Acreage, 22.1 Site Description: 1958 survey: Located one mile north of Roanoke on Route 601, about one mile from the site of the famous Tombstone Cemetery. 1967 survey: Located on west side of Tinker Creek, 0.2 mile east of Route 601 (Plantation Road), 0.7 mile north of Roanoke city limits. 1990 survey: Property its marked by mature boxwoods and mature hickory trees. Immediate surroundings are rural, but tract housing on all sides threaten the property's integrity. 1991 survey: Just to the east of Tinker Creek, the Huff house is situated at the bottom of a long slope to tite east of Plantation Road. The majority of the 30 -acre parcel is in front of the house which its completely unobstructed from Plantation Road. This open view is important to appreciate the proportion and symmetry of the design and the relative scale of the house. Given its size, fineness of architectural detail, and prominent owner, the Huff house was from its construction a significant 19th -century plantation. Much of the original planting surrounding the house remains including a double row of boxwoods up to the front door, clusters of hardwood and pine trees, and a semi -circular drive. 2006: The house and outbuildings were recently demolished and grounds bulldozed by a developer. 1990 survey: Property'ssite plan indicates original kitchen and slave quarters('?) east of the house, as well as baris and 20th century outbuildings (8 total buildings on site). An old school originally on the property (1893 survey) is now located on the 6101 Plantation Road property to the north, and is failing down. 1991: The three contributing structures include a smokehouse, kitclienlquar•ters, and a work -shed. The kitchen is a small gable roofed structure to the rear of the house. Surveyor Assessment: 1958: The Old Huff Place was originally owned by Andrew Huff and is currently owned by S.D. Stokes, and was built circa 1850- 1855. The place was raided by Hunter's Raiders during the Civil War. 1990 survey: The current owner (S.D. Stokes) provided the following information: (Mr. Stokes was a tax assessor in Roanoke and did research) The property was sold to Louis Huff in 1855. An 1892 or 1893 survey indicated a school on the property. The 5 -bay side (east) is said to have been the main facade accoring to the owner. He says evidence of the walkway and a previous road exist. According to the 1958 HABS form, this house was raided by Hunters Raiders during the Civil War. The farm is surrounded by tract housing and is slated for development. 1991 survey: The Lewis Huff House, located at 5621 Plantalion Road, on Tinker Creek north of the city of Roanoke, in Roanoke County, is eligible for listing in the l�lational Register of Historic Places under Criterion C. It is a significant example of a local 1- CouselEllplan variant with Greek Revival detailing such as the 616 windows and doorway with transom and sidehglits, it is also distinguished by its unique windown and interior omementation, especially the "egg" pattern molding, brick work, and central stair hall. These details are considered characteristic of the work of local carpenter Gustavus Sedon, who was involved with several significant buildings in the area. They include Speedwell (1877), Pleasant Grove (1853), Belle Aire (1855), and Hollins College (1855-1880). These designs reflect the local building tradition of the I -house with the rear ell extension, variegated brickwork, and distinctive carving. July 27, 2015 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 08 0-00 15 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data 2006: Roanoke County land tax books show that the house and outbuildings were built under the ownership of Lewis Huff in 1870, and were valued at $1500. Physical and circumstantial evidence suggests that David Deyerle, who lived in the area and helped build Hollins College, was responsible for the house's brickwork. The use of a three-tier hierachy of brick bonds was consistent with Deyerle's usual modus operandi. The principal facade was constructed using the fashionable stretcher bond, accomplished with specially made bricks that lapped each other in the two outer wythes of the wall. The secondary fagade received the second highest bond in the hierarchy, 5 -course American with Flemish variant (5 stretcher courses to one Flemish course), while the seldom seen south and rear elevations received 4 -coarse common bond. The bricks are also characteristically oversized and brown in color. Surveyor Recommendation: Legacy Ownership Ownership Category Ownership Entity Private No Data .. ...................... I'r3nary Resource Inforintatatan Resource Category: Domestic Resource Type: Single Dwelling Date of Construction: 1870 Historic Time Period: Reconstruction and Growth (1866 - 1916) Historic Context(s): Domestic, Subsistence/Agriculture Architectural Style: Greek Revival Form: No Data Number of Stories: 2.0 Condition: Demolished Interior Pian: Central Passage, Single Pile Threats to Resource: No Data Architectural Description: Architecture Summary, 1958: Greek Revival farm dwelling, two stories, brick, with typical Greek Revival woodwork, Gothic mantels, pediments over exterior fan window, arched egg detail pediment on 2nd floor. Of high value to the community, this building should be preserved. 1967 survey: Brick, 2 stories, hipped roof, mid -19th century. 1990 survey: Greek Revival 1 -house with 2 -room ell; built before 1855, this currently vacant farmhouse sits on 19.71 acres. It is an excellent example of a Greek Revival house. It is very eclectic with unusual, very individualized moldings. The house was remodeled in the 1920s during which time an addition was made to the southeast. The brick on the south end end is 4 -course American bond, the facade is common bond, and the north elevation is 5 -course American bond. "L" configuration: central passage, single pile and original rear ell. Brick foundation with a full basement; hipped standing seam metal roof; 616 windows; 5 original bays on the front and 3 on the side. Porch is I -story, 5 -bay, and there is a side porch that is 1 -story and I -bay; 3 interior end brick chimneys. Egg and dart trim in segmented arches above the 2nd boor windows; pediments over 1st floor windows. Front orientation has changed (possibly); Doric pilaster columns appear to be a later addition, Interior: Greek Revival moldings; open stringer stairs; all original moldings intact in living and dining areas (window trim). These are exotic renditions of Greek Revival, indicating the possible use of a pattern book. Dog car fanciful trim in primary spaces on 1 st floor with an oriental flavor. 2006: The house was recently DEMOLISHED and grounds bulldozed. Exterior Components Component Component 'Type Material Material Treatment Windows Sash, Double -Hung Wood 6!6 Windows Sash, Double -Hung Wood Multiple -light Chimneys interior Brick No Dula Roof Hipped Metal Standing Seam Porch I -story, 5 -bay Wood Columns, Square Structural System and Masonry Brick Other Exterior Treatment Secondary Resource nformal!on July 27, 2015 Page: 2 of 6 Virginia Department of Historic Resources Architectural Survey Form Secondary Resource #1 Resource Category: Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type: Bam Architectural Style: No Do1a Form: No Data Date of Construction: No Data Condition: Demolished Threats to Resource: No Data Architectural Description: 5 barns Number of Stories: No Dam Secondary Resource #2 Resource Category: Domestic Resource Type: Spring/Spring ]louse Architectural Style: No Data Form: No Dalry Date of Construction: 1870 Condition: Demolished Threats to Resource: No Data Architectural Description: No Data Number of Stories: No Darr Secondary Resource #3 Resource Category: Domestic Resource Type: Slave/Servant Quarters Architectural Style: No Dahr Form: No Datu Date of Construction: 1870 Condition: No Dada Threats to Resource: No Data Architectural Description: No Data Number of Stories: No Data Secondary Resource #4 Resource Category: Domestic Resource Type: Kitchen Architectural Style: No Data Form: No Doiu Date of Construction: 1870 Condition: Demolished Threats to Resource: No Nola Architectural Description: No Dalit Number of Stories: No Oula Secondary Resource #5 Resource Category: Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type: Barn DHR ID: 080-0015 Other DHR ID: No Data July 21, 2015 Page: 3 of 6 Virginia Department of Historic Resources Architectural Survey l:onn Architectural Style: No Data Form: No Data Date of Construction: No Data Condition: No Dula Threats to Resource: No Data Architectural Description: No Data No Data No Data Number of Stories: No Data Secondary Resource #6 Resource Category: Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type: Burn Architectural Style: No Data Form: No Data Date of Construction: No Data Condition: No Data Threats to Resource: No Data Architectural Description: No Data Number of Stories: No Data Secondary Resource #7 Resource Category: Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type: Barn Architectural Style: No Dato Form: No Data Date of Construction: No Data Condition: No Data Threats to Resource: No Data Architectural Description: No Data Number of Stories: No Data Secondary Resource #S Resource Category: Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type: Barn Architectural Style: No Data Form: No Data Date of Construction: No Data Condition: No Data Threats to Resource: No Data Architectural Description: No Dala Number of Stories: No Data DHR ID: 080-0015 Other DHR ID: No Data July 27, 2015 Pagc: 4 of 6 Virginia Department of Historic Resources Architectural Survey Form Event Type: Survey:Windshield Project Review File Number: No Drrha Investigator: Pulice, Michael OrganizationlCompany: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Data Survey Date: 5/23/2006 Dlir Library Report Number: No Data Project Staff/Notes; No Data Event Type: Destroyed Project Review File Number; No Data Investigator: No Data Organization/Company: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Data Survey Date: 5/1/2006 Dhr Library Report Number: No Data Project Staff/Notes: No Data Event Type: Survey:Phase II/Intensive Project Review File Number: No Dahr tnvestigator: Pulice, Michael Organization/Company: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Data Survey Date: 11/19/2002 Din• Library Report Number: No Data Project Staff/Notes: No Data Event Type: DHR Staff: Eligible DHR ID: 080-0015 Staff Name: DHR Event Date: 11/19/1991 Staff Comment Roanoke Eastern Bypass Huff House was rated at the local level for significance in the area of architecture. It was found to be eligible with a score of 33. Event Type: Survey:Phase II/Intensive Project Review File Number: 1991-1669-F investigator: Tucker, Lisa M. Organization/Company: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Data Survey Date: 10/21/1991 Dhr Library Report Number: No Darra Project Staff/Notes: No Data Event Type: Survey:Pliase II/Intensive Project Review File Number: No Data Investigator: Tucker, Lisa M. July 27, 2015 DHR ID: 080-0015 Other DHR ID: No Data Virginia Department of Historic Resources Architectural Survey Form Organization/Company: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Dater Survey Date: 1/25/1990 Dhr Library Report Number: No Data Project Staff/Notes: Frazier Associates Event Type: Survey:Phase I/ Reconnaissance Project Review File Number: IVa Data Investigator: No Dara Organization/Company: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Data Survey Date: 10/1/1967 Dhr Library Report Number: No Dara Project Staff/Notes: Fall of 1967 - update of HABSI form Event Type: Survey:HABS Inventory Project Review Nile Number: No Dahr Investigator: Hunt, Jr, Waller S. Organization/Company: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Dahl Survey Date: 6/21/1958 Dhr Library Report Number: No Data Project Staff/Notes: No Data DHR ID: 080-0015 Other DHR ID: No Data July 27, 2015 Pagc: 6 of 6 I T kn M OD ti tj y ° Lo t3 � c l 3 h ti,o 4• _ 4 '� �J�''�' ftry i. D+iG. - • v` p dre,.. .? t,. d U'zS o �' • ;�' ;-yam. ' _ �� .' Ff4r - + �, I 4 _ �a a q v iy cD ZYa 'rte.--.`�a'•�'�r_.�., fit` _ * K. , ,� N C � y� � eu Qj 13 'Its 1-7 CW 4t 49KM P= Aid CO l . t1 . "s:r .• 5 �. ? N :��4�L ice: i �_re�'�•�,f � . � '�i� K � d � � aQ 1� �:_ � + t - .- i ,� im^A R • �� 'fib ^� � o-�pap � � +4. - -.. rf•L�' a ,. ....-=, c .yw . - � -ti � G� °' m Do � '°� .�° 0 N W v D cd cd rqx— LL.,4-u I t— o��" °' a oO t co cc Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 080-0034 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data ,PropQrty I10.01400n Property Names Property Evaluation Status Name Explanation Name Historic Christian Nininger House OIIR Staff: Potentially Eligible Historic Walnut Grove Current Meadowbrook Property Addresses ROANOKE Current - 6103 Plantation Road Route 116 County/Independent City(s): Roanoke (County) Incorporated Town(s): Hollins Zip Code(&): 24019 Magisterial District(s): No Dalti Tax Parcel(s): 027.20-01-27.00-0000 USGS Quad(s): ROANOKE Adltion�l Pr�periy Infttrmatiou Architecture Setting: Rural Acreage: 30.3 Site Description: 2008: The house stands on a private drive off of Plantation Road. Surveyor Assessment: 2008: The date of construction is documented in the 1969 land tax book for Roanoke County, which notes "improvements" made in 1866, valued at $2000. In 1867 the value of building(s) increased to $2800. Surveyor Recommendation: Recommended Eligible Ownership Ownership Category Ownership Entity Private No Dom Virginia Department of Historic Resources Architectural Survey Fenn DHR 1D: 080-0034 Other DHR 1D: No Data Roof Hipped Asphalt Shingle Windows Sash, Double -Hung Wood 616 Windows Sash, Double -Hung Wood Multiple -light Porch I -story, 3 -bay Wood Columns, Square Chimneys Interior Brick Not Visible Structural System and Masonry Brick Other Exterior Treatment Exterior Treatment Roof ;Secondalry Resource ...... mahon Secondary Resource #1 Resource Category: Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type: Smokc/Meat House Architectural Style: No discernible style Form: No Dula Date of Construction: 1866 Condition: Good Threats to Resource: None Known Architectural Description: January 2011 Architecture Summary: brick american bond stntcture, I single -leaf paneled door May 2012: Smokehouse located off the southeast corner of main house. Hand -made brick walls laid in 4 -course common bond; pyramidal roof with asphalt shingles. . Resource Type: Number of Stories: 1 Exterior Components Form: Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Brick American/Common Bond Structural System and Masonry Exterior Treatment Roof Pyramidal Asphalt No Data Secondary Resource #2 Resource Category: Domestic Resource Type: Garage Architectural Style: No discernible style Form: No Data Date of Construction: 1998 Condition: Good Threats to Resource: None Known Architectural Description: January 2011 Architecture Summary: frame structure, front gable roof, garage door - paned, 1 single -leaf pane/panel door ---------------------- Number of Stories: 1 Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Structural System and Wood Frame Wood Weatherboard Exterior Treatment Roof Front Gable Unknown No Dena Secondary Resource #3 Resource Category: Resource Type: Architectural Style: Form; Date of Construction: Condition: Threats to Resource: Architectural Description: Agriculture/Subsistence Barn No discernible style No Data 1950 Good None Known July 27, 2015 Page: 2 of 4 Virginia Department of Historic Resources Architectural Survey Form January 2011: Frame barn, 20th century. Number of Stories: 1 Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Structural System and Wood Frame Wood Vertical Board Exterior Treatment $is#or><c District Informaiio><t Historic District Name: No Dala Local Historic District Name: No Data Historic District Significance: No Drury Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number: Alt) Data Investigator, Mike Police Organization/Company: DHR Sponsoring Organization: No Data Survey Date: 5/3/2012 Dhr Library Report Number: No Data Project Staff/Notes: New interior and exterior digital photos of house. Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number: No Data Investigator: Pulice, Michael Organizatiou/Company: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Data Survey Date: 1/14/2011 Dhr Library Report Number: No Data Project Staff/Notes: DHR Western region architectural historian Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number: No Data Investigator: Pulice, Michael Organization/Company: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Data Survey Date: 5/22/2008 Dhr Library Report Number: No Diva Project Staff/Notes: DHR Western region architectural historian Event Type: DHR Staff: Potentially Eligible DHR ID: 080-0034 Other DHR ID: No Data DHR ID: 080-0034 Staff Name: DHR Event Date: 9/7/1993 Staff Comment The Nininger House (Meadowbrook), Roanoke County (DHR ##80-34), was rated at the local level for significance in the area of architecture. It July 27, 2015 Page: 3 of 4 Virginia Department of Historic Resources Architectural Survey Form was found to be conditionally eligible with a score of 30. RRPO should comment on the property's eligibility. Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number: No Dula Investigator: Tucker, Lisa OrganizationlCompany: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Data Survey Date: 10,116/1991 Dhr Library Report Number, No Duca Project Staff/Notes: VDHR - Architectural Survey Form Event Type: Survey: Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number: No Dale Investigator: Bedell, Ann Organization/Company: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Dila Survey Date: 1/1/1970 Dlir Library Report Number: No Dula Project Staff/Notes: VHLC Structural Survey Form - Hollins College. Undated, but likely from early 1970s, Event Type: Survey:HABS Inventory Project Review File Number: Investigator: Organization/Company: Sponsoring Organization: Survey Date: Dhr Library Report Number: Project Staff/Notes: No 1D(a Nu Data Roanoke Historical Society Unknown (DSS) No Data 10/1/1967 No Data Bibliography: No Data Property Notes: No Data Project Bibliographic Information: Pulice, Michael. Discovering the True Legacies of the Deyerle Builders, Roanoke: Historical Society of Western Virginia, 2011. DHR ID: 080-0034 Other DHR ID: No Data July 27, 2015 Page: 4 of 4 ;gid iol .a►ti.. : a e 1, ; y Cpl w , s` � � ' - n � •� � � - � ay w •� � a v y w ice,:•' t . „ �` a 1 _ y LO CD o is a o r� zy � 1 B • ti �E`•r -� � is _'pili" ss,1� � ^ Y .�'�lC � ;v z U 4 V 14 00 14 dl I��•,1 _ - to N 'z COC. yy A v a o a o O''''�►""� ' v t3 t3 eon r'r (( �' kms' • '` t � T' w i"'I a � ° a ^' ts Sir WAX cl. t e r obe MOW 'c ^as"�. � .'e. -- •�. ,00t � ���,� +i"-"'•� . S�ii1' � '��t�,• l�'#.` _ .,tea- iCLR� A'o •� A 2 1411 CO pCS PL4 CO N • Co V 0 LL (4 CA Q Q by v Q y ,W/ E� N cd 0 0 a � a'LL •I 04 Cp H N AU U 0 0 0+ iv CJ T • CAu 0 /000pb : a o Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 080-0393 Architectural Survey Form Other DAR ID: No Data County/Independent City(s): Roanoke (County) Incorporated Town(s): Nn Data Zip Code(s): A4, Duro Magisterial District(s): No Daw Tax Parcei(s): No Data USGS Quad(s): ROANOKE Primary Resource information'; Resource Category: Education Resource Type: School Date of Construction: 19000a historic Time Period: Reconstruction and Growth (1866 - 1916) Historic Contest(s): Domestic Architectural Style: Other Form: No Data Number of Stories: 1.0 Condition: Poor Interior Plan: No Data Threats to Resource: No Dao Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: Woad shingles in the large gable ends. Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Roof Gable Metal Standing Seam Structural System and Frame Wood Other Exterior Treatment Porch 1 -story, 1 -bay Wood Other Chimneys Other Brick No Dwa Foundation Solid/Continuous Brick Aro Data Secondary Resm ource inforation _ Poo 1 gf 2 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 080-0393 Architectural Survey Fonn Other DHR ID: No Data Secondary Resource ##1 Nrt Data Resource Category: No Data Resource Type: No Data Architectural Style: No Data Form: No Data Date of Construction: No Data Condition: No Data Threats to Resource: No Dula Architectural Description: No Data SRM Events Event Type: Survey: Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number: Nrt Data Investigator: Frazier Associates Organization/Company: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: Nrt Data Survey Date: 5/1/1991 Dhr Library Report Number: No Data Project Staff/Notes: No Data July 27, 2015 Page: 2 of 2 © � w 0 4 Y+i p O W fd 1i �U�yy cD a U UA O O O'1% CJ 'dd cd C,d tom] V ' •y U U U 'G Fv 0000'W r` a 0 00 ❑ IJ C] C) O N N dT 0 LL - LO OD r p N L LL b r r a� CD N d r U O ; C atl U C' �i a s a _rn-13u L a U Chi a st ? c u coq � d v = v v � C ° °m tr � o h y w � U s C 'sem. U a a y d C 'l a m c y G� �a y4j CJ v[�Q WIC �I a O Cl 0 m c a b0 y C • � d C O w ir.q p' �. 6p iml cl v O �W�.. a L. U U� U ti w C) C) .. N N dT 0 LL - LO OD r p N L LL b r r a� CD N d r Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 080-0394 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data Prt►per 7Information Property Names Property Evaluation Status Name Explanation Name Function/Location House, 5249 Lois Lane Not Evaluated Property Addresses Current - 5249 Lois Lane CountylIndependent City(s): Roanoke (County) Incorporated Town(s): No Daro Zip Code(s): 24019 Magisterial Distriet(s): No Data Tax Parcel(s): 39.05-1-11 USGS Quad(s): ROANOKE A,dd><ttonal PropewEy Architecture Setting: Suburban Acreage: 1.9 Site Description: 1991: The house is surrounded by woods. The immediate vicinity maintains rural integrity, but neighborhood integrity is last, 2011: The house stands on the east side of Tinker Creek, between the north -south Route 601 to the east, and Plantation Road to the west. 1991: None. 2011: There are stone walls and walkways around the house, which are now buried or obscured by forest growth. Surveyor Assessment: 2011: This is a notable early -mid -19th -century log house that could have been associated with the buff family, which owned much of the immediate surrounding land during the 19th and early 20th centuries. Surveyor Recommendation: Legacy Ownership Ownership Category Ownership Entity Private No Dato July 27, 2015 Page: 1 of 3 Virginia Departtrrent of Historic Resources DHR ID: 080-0394 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data 2011: The house off of Lois Lane, on the east bank of Tinker Creek, is a substantial single -pen, two-story, weatherboarded hewn -log house, measuring 30 by 27 feet. The logs are mostly, if not all oak, and are V -notched at the corners. One of the larger logs measures 17 inches in diameter, but all are relatively large and are neatly hewn, notched and joined. The original, hewn and planed floor joists throughout the house measure about 5 by 6 inches thick and have beaded edges, which suggests a pre -1840 construction date, The cut nails found throughout and the absence of wrought nails together suggest a post -1820s date. The original (probably stone) chinutcys have been removed, but the limestone rubble basement walls re€uam well intact. On the front of the house is a 20th -century one-story porch supported by machine -made -brick piers. Across the back of the house is a one-story shed -roofed addition. The house has been unoccupied for years and is now overgrown with flora. Though the roof structure has been largely rebuilt, several presumably original rafter pairs survive in-place. They are hewn, not sawn, and mortise -and -tenoned and pegged together. Roman numerals appear on some of them. The wide attic floorboards appear to be original and are fastened with cut nails. Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Roof Gable Asphalt Shingle Windows Sash, Double -Hung No Data 616 Porch 1 -story, 3 -bay Wood Other Chimneys Interior Brick No Dertu Foundation Solid/Continuous Stone Rubble, Coursed Structural System and Log Wood Weatherboard Exterior Treatment .. Secondary Resourcenf©anion No Dula Secondary Resource #1 Pulicc, Michael Resource Category: No Data Resource Type: No Dalu Architectural Style: No Daru Form: No Data Date of Construction: No Data Condition: No Dodo Threats to Resource: No Dula Architectural Description: No Data CBM Events Event Type: Survey:Phase II/Intensive Project Review File Number: No Dula Investigator: Pulicc, Michael Organization/Company: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Data Survey Date: 5/2412011 Dhr Library Report Number: No Dani Project Staff/Notes: DHR Western Region architectural historian Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance July 27, 2015 Page: 2 of 3 Virginia Department of Historic Resources Architectural Survey Form DHR ID: 080-0394 Other DHR ID: No Data Project Review File Number: No Dow Investigator: Shareff, Nancy Organization/Company: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Data Survey Date: 5/1/1991 Dhr Library Report Number: No Data Project Staff/Notes: Frazier Associates Bibliography: No Data Properly Notes: No Data Project Bibliographic Information: No Data July 27, 2015 Page: 3 of 3 s 'r. S/7 y p x O p (V N E0 y U � LL L ) o CO O A QCd N w o O of ,tl +-•+ - cUC G�1 LL a3 a� 'CD bA w U7 O LO Cw a0+ " cd Cd �-1 13 1313 ❑ 13 0 �� Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 080-0406 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR 1D: No Data Propel>iy Ifolrmaholn Property Names Resource Category: Property Evaluation Status Name Explanation Name Single Dwelling Function/Location House, 5524 Old Mountain Road Not Evaluated Property Addresses Historic Time Period: Reconstruction and Growth (1966 - 1916) Current - 5524 Old Mountain Road Conntyllndependent City(s): Roanoke (County) Incorporated Town(s): No Dara Zip Code(s): No Dora Magisterial District(s): No Data Tax Parcel(s): Aro Drrtrr USGS Quad(s): ROANOKE Atdih©ina1 Plt�perty,Infot>I>aat><on Architecture Setting: No Data Acreage: Na Data Site Description: No Data Surveyor Assessment: Example of late 19th, early 20th century dwelling with outbuildings. Surveyor Recommendation-, No Data PK�IIia)ly Resource Itaformatlw Resource Category: Domestic Resource Type: Single Dwelling Date of Construction: 1891 Ca Historic Time Period: Reconstruction and Growth (1966 - 1916) Historic Coatext(s): Domestic Architectural Style: No Data Form: No Drrtrr Number of Stories: 2.0 Condition: Good Interior Plan: No Drrtrr Threats to Resource: None Known Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: Pedimented gable roof, rear sunroom oand one-story addition, some double windows, corbeled chimney, single light gable windows. Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Structural System and Frame Wood Other Exterior Treatment Windows Sash, Doublc-Hung Wood 2/2 Roof Gable Metal Shingle Porch 1 -story Wood Other Windows Fixed Wood 1 -light Chimneys Interior Brick Not Visible July 27, 2015 Page: 1 of 3 Virginia Department of Historic Resources Architectural Survey Form Seeondary Resource Infrmafion Secondary Resource ##1 Resource Category: Domestic Resource Type: Garage Architectural Style: No Duda Form: No Data Date of Construction: No Dura Condition: Fair Threats to Resource: None Known Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: Frame structure with vertical wood siding, gable roof, metal, standing seam. Number of Stories: I Secondary Resource ##2 DHR ID: 080-0406 Other DHR ID: No Data Resource Category: Domestic Resource Type: Single Dwelling Architectural Style: No Data Form: No Data Date of Construction: No Dara Condition: Fair Threats to Resource: None Known Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: old house, frame structure with vertical wood boards, roof, gable, metal, standing seam, fixed, 4 -light windows. Number of Stories: 2 Secondary Resource ##3 Resource Category: DSS Legacy Resource Type: Shed Architectural Style: Na Data Form: No Data Date of Construction: No Data Condition: Poor Threats to Resource: Structural Failure Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: A number of frame sheds stili exist on the property Number of Stories: I Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number: No Data Investigator: Frazier Association Organization/Company: Unknown (DSS) July 27, 2015 rage: c o] �3 Virginia Department of Historic Resources Architectural Survey Form Sponsoring Organization: No Dada Survey Date: 5/6/1991 Dhr Library Report Number: Nn Data Project Staff(Notes: No Data B>tbl�ogr�hie Infprmativn Bibliography: No Data Property Notes: No Data Project Bibliographic Information: No Data DHR ID: 080-0406 Other DHR ID: No Data July 27, 2015 Page: 3 of 3 r'.f. y � r77. % •� .vim �K �gig - O C) +, N � O LL w Lfl CO y T N d is O •� O 'M aid a a Lno •}��„ N O T ,� ° S� chi � � cy qq ° V N N vi F9 Q � ai UN c R C ca A. 0 O'y� .it,- 6. i U U� p 0 0� -s� p 4d a nom•= .2 cl w �° Ar A 'U � Ctli b �• b istt: O C) +, N � O LL Lfl CO T N N •� aid Lno N O T ° cy qq ° Q � ai UN c R C O'y� .it,- c u -s� tl a nom•= ,fia �° � Ctli b �• b istt: Q tl R R R .t 540 Di Ub � R tl a c � U r v Q A 5 4O b C m 4-0 m R WU � aL� W'es y H q ••a .: A z �.- O C) +, N � O LL Lfl CO T N O Lno N O T Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 080-0417 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data s)Property )uforin4.fan - Property Names Property Evaluation Status Roanoke (County) Name Explanation Name Zip Code(s): 24019 Historic Rudd House DHR Staff: Eligible 38.12-5-6 Historic Windy Hill Historic/Current Windmere Historic/Location William P. Huff, Sr., House, 5415 Plantation Rd, Property Addresses Current - 5415 Plantation Road County/Independent City(s): Roanoke (County) Incorporated Town(s): No Daw Zip Code(s): 24019 Magisterial District(s): NO Dala Tax Parcei(s): 38.12-5-6 USCS Quad(s): ROANOKE 2011: The house stands well off the east side of Plantation Road. The large lot is shaded by white pine and spruce trees. ------------ ---------------- 1991: There is a pump house located on the southeast edge of the house. 2011: There are no additional historic resources. Surveyor Assessment: Ca. 1970: This dwelling was originally owned by William P. Huff and is currently owned by Walter Rudd. 1991: Owner was not aware of any history of this property. A rare example of a highly decorated Queen Anne style house in Roanoke County. It is threatened by neglect. The interior of this house maintains all of its original components and is threatened by neglect, especially water damage. 2011: Windmere is among the most impressive late -Victorian houses in the Roanoke Valley. Though remarkably unaltered, it stands vacant, in increasingly worsening condition. Surveyor Recommendation: legacy Ownership Ownership Category Ownership Entity Private No Da7a I'rlmaryReso1>ircenformatlori Resource Category: Resource Type: Date of Construction: Historic Time Period: Historic Coutext(s): Architectural Style: Form: Number of Stories: Condition: Domestic Single Dwelling 1880Ca Reconstruction and Growth (1866 - 1916) Archileclure/Landscape, Domestic Victorian, Queen Anne No Dei1a 2.5 Fair July 27, 2015 Page: 1 or 4 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 080-0417 Architectural Survey Foran Other DHA ID: No Data Interior Plan; Irregular Threats to Resource: Deterioration, Neglect Architectural Description: Ca, 1970: Although constructed of brick, it has the wooden "gingerbread" of the Carpenter Gothic style. Steeple gable of Gothic Revival roof; brick foundation partially above ground; 111 windows; 3 brick chirmleys (center and both ends). This house was built in 1882-1885, and is in deteriorated condition. Architecture Summary, 1991; 2 -112 -story brick house, with complex roof of intersecting gables, built 1880-1900. Sawtooth bargeboard, scrolled brackets on porch and two-story bay, windows with hood, wood finials, sawn balustrade, reeded pilasters on bay between the windows, door with arched transom, sidelights; 5 -course American bond. This is an outstanding example of a Queen Anne interior. The mantels are stylized with abstracted Classical forms. All original door hardware exists - all copper. There are transoms with etched glass above the doors. Between the living room and parlor is a pair of pocket doors approximately 12 feet high. 2011: This elaborate brick house has barely been altered inside or out, but has not been occupied for forty years. During that time it has been neglected, but in recent years has been used for auto parts storage. The roof leaks in several locations. A large puddle of standing water was encountered in one second -floor bedroom. Buckets are currently in use throughout the house to catch rain water. The front porch is terriby deteriorated and can no longer be accessed. Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Roof Gable State Shingle Chimneys Interior Brick No Dori Windows Sash, Double -flung Wood III Porch 1 -story Wood tither Structural System and Masonry Brick Bond, American, 5 -course Exterior Treatment Foundation Solid/Continuous Brick NO Dula Structural System and Masonry Brick Bond, Common Exterior Treatment Structural System and Masonry Brick Flemish, Irregular Exterior Treatment Secondary Resource Xnformta#1on Secondary Resource #1 Resource Category: Resource Type: Architectural Style: Form: Date of Construction: Condition: Threats to Resource: Architectural Description: 1991: Secondary Resource #2 Agrieuulture/Subsistence Pump House No Discernable Style No Daly No Dola NIA None Known Resource Category: Funerary Resource Type: Cemetery Architectural Style: No Discernable Style Form: No Dara Date of Construction: No Dara Condition: NIA Threats to Resource: None Known Architectural Description: 1991: Noted on form - not otherwise surveyed and not photographed. Current Use: No Darcy Historic Religious Afiilitation: Unknown July 27, 2015 Page: 2 of 4 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 080-0417 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data Ethnic Affiliation: Unknown Has Marked Graves: False Has Unmarked Graves: False Enclosure Type: No Dutra Number Of Gravestones: No Dino Earliest ]Narked Death Year: No Data Latest Marked Death Year: No Data ................. storc Dii:triet Information Historic District Name: No Data Local Historic District Name: No 1)(4111 Historic District Significance: No Data SRM Events Event Type: Survey:Phase II/Intensive Project Review File Number: No Data Investigator: Pulice, Micbael Organization/Company: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Data Survey Date: 5/24/2011 Dhr Library Report Number: No Data Project Staff/Notes: DHR Western Region architectural historian Event Type: DHR Staff: Eligible DHR ID: 080-0417 Staff Name: DHR Evaluation Committee Event Date: 9/9/1993 Staff Comment Windmere, Roanoke County (DHR 80-417), was rated at the local level for significance in the area of architecture. It was found to be eligible with a score of 31. Event Type: Survey:Phase II/Intensive Project Review File Number: No Data Investigator: Frazier Assoc.- Organization/Company: Unknown (DSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Data Survey Date: 10/10/1991 Dhr Library Report Number: No Dura Project Staff/Notes: Nancy Shareff Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number: Investigator: Organization/Company: Sponsoring Organization: No Data Nancy Shareff, Lisa Tucker Unknown (DSS) No Data July 27, 2015 Page: 3 of 4 Virginia Department of Historic Resources Architectural Survey Form Survey Date: 5/10/1991 Dhr Library Report Number: No Dula Project Staff/Nates- Frazier Assoc. - Event Type: DHR ID Number Change DHR ID: 080-0417 Other DHR ID: No Data DIIR ID: 080-0417 Staff Name: DHR Event Date: 1/1/1991 Staff Comment This resource was originally recorded in the city of Roanoke under DHR file number 128-0026. Identification changed to 080-0417, as the property is in Roanoke County. Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number: 128-0026 Investigator: Spencer, Mary Yancey organization/Company: Unknown (BSS) Sponsoring Organization: No Data Survey Date: 1/1/1970 Dhr Library Report Number: No Dura Project StafflNotes: Structural Survey Form - for Hollins College art department (no photographs and no date on tri -fold form (circa late 1960s/early 1970s). Places Near the Mountains. Roanoke: privately published, November 1985. p. 214. July 27, 2015 Page: 4 of 4 Z . C7 C7 N O# N C7 U - LO CO T O Q N C7 C) to 0 Lq cv T V d � v � U A O y vvpp U 114 �41 .4 LSI s••� 0 00 ❑ OO J Z . C7 C7 N O# N C7 U - LO CO T O Q N C7 C) to 0 Lq cv T Appendix E Flood Map Wetland Map Mead & Hunt, Inc. R4021600-155994.01 Lo • ci CL W LL r 4- rq la Eti ID a �` m m `m m r17 ' is Q m io G N is c "C1 ❑ c m m c c i m C td N; Y�q t Stl 2 [G cm la IL W Ell LL J d' 6 Z LLL ❑ _lwwoaa r _ ►. w) w p o v CIT i�l �a N r+l,'e moi �Ir9 a( ym IL row, 4 + i f N� m � J7 -e. oam ,. /o s � Olt 1 - w .Mr ` • , ,�� a • T O O � o �5 o N Y O) (n N \ \, > xN O) -0 2 �' a-- 2m N CL O O `. of .� Q c m o y d \ O) C C N U oD N N Z o m � _ Z N m a 00 cg —' L U O) N O N N O V N tll all" U =E°S- am CL CL O CL.. O xa°aan Q W d d H Q ` �n T- ry N U N U N U T- ry U) N U N T- ry U N KI > o O o 0 L � o 0 C) 0 m cu O a) � � q o �, - T m O) co C' a — — 6 x N O (n N U -0 N 0 O O = z ( � _ T E T i\ C O Q Q a N — — O) O .. E '- o U-- nLL N \ \ 2 C .0 N U Zo N N o o Z 00 m - a cS d__ o d U o \ i -' r L O- s jp U) O Q U) O Q m .. N U) 'p) O U m N =�sS. O O X N �p / neaan Q W d d H Q 9 Use & Design Standards — Miscellaneous Uses Sec. 30-87-2. Broadcasting Tower. (A) Intent: The intent of these provisions is to regulate the placement of new and replacement broadcasting towers within Roanoke County. These provisions provide broadcasting tower applicants, property owners, and all other Roanoke County citizens clear guidance on the official policies and standards of the County. These policies and standards shall be used by applicants as a guide when selecting alternative broadcasting tower sites and broadcasting tower designs within the county. In addition, the county staff, planning commission and board of supervisors shall use these policies and standards, the Roanoke County community plan and the general special use permit criteria found in section 30-19 as a guide for evaluating any future requests for broadcasting towers. In the interest of preserving and enhancing the scenic and natural beauty of Roanoke County it is the goal of the county to achieve a long term reduction in the number of broadcasting towers within the county, and where possible, to achieve a reduction in the height of existing broadcasting towers throughout the county, with special emphasis on towers located along or near the ridgetops of major mountains and land forms. In addition, it is the goal of the county, where possible, to achieve the relocation of existing broadcasting towers and associated utility and access corridors which have a high visual impact on scenic resources. To this end, the county will work cooperatively with broadcasting tower owners and applicants and land owners to achieve these goals. It is the official policy of the county to encourage and promote the collocation of antennas on existing public and private structures within the county. To achieve this end, the county encourages all wireless communication providers to locate new antennas on existing structures. Permits for new broadcasting towers should only be requested when no other reasonable alternative exists for locating needed antennas. When new broadcasting towers are proposed as a last alternative, the requested broadcasting tower location, height and design should be chosen to protect and enhance the scenic and natural beauty of Roanoke County. Broadcasting tower locations at elevations lower than surrounding ridge lines are preferred. The use of stealth designs should be considered for any new broadcasting tower. It is the intent of the county to fully comply with all of the applicable provisions of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 and other applicable federal and state laws as said laws address and preserve Roanoke County's zoning authority and provide to the communication industry the right and responsibility to provide communication services within their service areas. (B) Applicability: These standards shall apply to all new and replacement broadcasting towers within Roanoke County with the exception that new and replacement Use & Design Standards — Miscellaneous Uses broadcasting towers and associated antenna not exceeding thirty (30) feet in height and located within any commercial or industrial zoning district shall be permitted by right provided: a. The proposed tower is a monopole type design; b. The general area of the proposed tower is currently served by above ground utilities including electric power and telephone poles; and All other use and design standards for the construction of the broadcasting tower and associated facilities are met. 2. No modification to increase the height, size, type or location of any existing broadcasting tower or associated facilities, excluding antennas, shall be made unless such modification results in the full compliance of the broadcasting tower and facilities with all of the requirements of this ordinance. Antennas may be installed on any existing structure within the county, without the necessity of obtaining a special use permit, provided said antenna does not meet the definition of a broadcasting tower, does not increase the height of the existing structure more than ten (10) feet, and does not result in the structure and antenna exceeding the maximum structure height for that zoning district. 4. These provisions shall not apply to any temporary broadcasting tower erected for the purpose of system design or testing provided the temporary broadcasting tower is erected for a period not to exceed twenty-one (2 1) days. In addition, in declared local emergency situations, the county administrator shall be authorized to allow the temporary installation of a broadcasting tower for the duration of the local emergency. A zoning permit pursuant to section 30-9 of this ordinance shall be applied for and approved prior to erecting any temporary or emergency tower. (C) Application requirements: All potential applicants for broadcasting towers shall consult with county planning staff at least thirty (30) days prior to submitting an application for a proposed broadcasting tower. During this consultation the applicant shall present information to the staff on system objectives, proposed coverage areas, and alternative sites considered and rejected. The staff shall provide the potential applicant information on Roanoke County policies and standards for broadcasting towers, and shall discuss with the applicant possible alternatives to broadcasting tower construction. 2. In addition to the application requirements contained in section 30-19-2 of this ordinance, all applicants for broadcasting towers shall provide the following at the time of application: 2 Use & Design Standards — Miscellaneous Uses a. The location of all other proposed broadcasting tower sites considered and rejected, and the specific technical, legal or other reasons for the rejection. b. The location of all other possible collocation sites considered and rejected, and the specific technical, legal or other reasons for the rejection. C. Accurate, to scale, photographic simulations showing the relationship of the proposed broadcasting tower and associated antenna to the surroundings. Photographic simulations shall also be prepared showing the relationship of any new or modified road, access or utility corridors constructed or modified to serve the proposed broadcasting tower site. The number of simulations and the perspectives from which they are prepared, shall be established with the staff at the consultation required in section C.1. above. d. A computerized terrain analysis showing the visibility of the proposed broadcasting tower and antenna at the requested height and location. If new or modified road, access or utility corridors are proposed, the terrain analysis shall also show the visibility of these new or modified features. e. Information on how the proposed site relates to the applicants existing communication system, including number of other sites within the Roanoke Valley, and the location of the antenna at each site. f. All broadcasting tower applicants shall be required, at their expense to conduct an on-site "balloon" or comparable test prior to the planning commission and board of supervisors hearings on the special use permit. The purpose of this test shall be to demonstrate the potential visual impact of the proposed tower. The dates and periods of these tests shall be established with the applicant at the pre -application consultation. g. Written verification that all required submittals to the FAA as required by section 30-87-2(D)6 of this ordinance have been submitted. 3. The applicant shall be responsible for all fees associated with the filing of the application including the reasonable cost of any independent analysis deemed necessary by the county to verify the need for the new broadcasting tower. The board of supervisors shall establish these fees, which shall be discussed with the applicant at the pre -application conference. (D) General standards: The maximum height of any proposed broadcasting tower and associated antenna shall be made as a condition of the special use permit, but in no case shall any broadcasting tower and antenna exceed one hundred ninety-nine (199) feet in Use & Design Standards — Miscellaneous Uses height. Applicants shall request the lowest broadcasting tower and antenna height necessary to accomplish their specific communication objectives. 2. The setback for any proposed broadcasting tower shall, at a minimum, conform to the requirements for principal structures for the proposed zoning district. However, in no case shall the minimum setback from the base of the broadcasting tower to any residential structure on an adjoining lot be less than forty (40) percent of the height of the tower, measured from the closest structural member of the broadcasting tower (excluding guy lines). Guy lines shall be exempt from the minimum setback requirements in side and rear yards for the respective zoning district, but shall comply with the setback requirements for the front yard. The minimum setback from any property line abutting a road right-of-way for any other building or structure associated with a broadcasting tower shall be fifty (50) feet. Such buildings or structures shall be located a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet from any other property line. 4. More than one (1) broadcasting tower shall be permitted on a lot provided all applicable requirements have been met including setback requirements. Broadcasting towers shall not be illuminated with any type of lighting apparatus, unless such lighting is a requirement of the FAA or FCC. When lighting is proposed to conform to federal requirement, the county shall contact the federal agency to verify the necessity of lighting, and to determine the minimal amount and type of lighting necessary to comply with federal guidelines. Security lighting, or a "down lighting" design may be installed on buildings and structures associated with a broadcasting tower. In no case shall any lighting violate section 30-94 of this ordinance. 6. Any proposed broadcasting tower within two (2) miles from any general or commercial airport or located at a ground elevation at or above two thousand (2,000) feet, average mean sea level, shall be referred to the appropriate regional office of the FAA for review and comment prior to filing an application for a special use permit. 7. All broadcasting towers shall comply with any additional requirements established in the airport overlay district in section 30-72 of this ordinance, and the emergency communications overlay district in section 30-73 8. Any broadcasting tower approved shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading, and the site approved shall be sized to accommodate the additional equipment necessary for at least three (3) other vendors/providers of communications services in order to minimize the proliferation of new broadcasting towers in the vicinity of the requested site. In addition, by applying and being granted the special use permit, the applicant and the owner of the land agree to make the broadcasting tower and tower site available for additional leases El Use & Design Standards — Miscellaneous Uses within the structural capacity of the broadcasting tower and at reasonable costs adequate to recover the capital, operating and maintenance costs of the broadcasting tower location required for the additional capacity. 9. A monopole broadcasting tower design is recommended. The board may approve an alternative broadcasting tower design if it finds that an alternative type of structure has less of a visual impact on the surrounding community and Roanoke County, and/or based upon accepted technical and engineering data a monopole design is not technically feasible. Cost shall not be a criteria for determining broadcasting tower design. 10. No broadcasting towers shall be permitted within the critical viewsheds of the Blue Ridge Parkway or Appalachian Trail as shown on any official map designating these viewsheds and pre -approved by the board of supervisors. In addition, no towers shall be proposed within any other designated area of local scenic, historical, ecological and cultural importance as designated and approved by the board of supervisors prior to the filing of a tower application. 11. By applying and being granted the special use permit, the applicant and the owner of the land agree to dismantle and remove the broadcasting tower and associated facilities from the site within ninety days of the broadcasting tower no longer being use for wireless communications. Dismantling and removal from the site shall only be required after notice by the County. If antennas on any approved tower are relocated to a lower elevation, the tower shall be shortened to the height of the highest antenna. A bond or similar performance guarantee may be required as part of the special use permit approval. Said guarantee will be in an amount sufficient to ensure removal of the tower and all associated facilities and the reclamation of the property and road, access and utility corridors to a condition that existed prior to tower construction. 12. All broadcasting tower structures and associated hardware, antennas, and facilities shall be a flat matted finish so as to reduce visibility and light reflection unless otherwise required by the FCC or FAA. 13. No business signs shall be allowed on the property identifying the name of, or services offered by, any business associated with the broadcasting tower. (E) General review policies: All special use permit requests for new broadcasting towers, including the replacement or modification of existing broadcasting towers shall be reviewed by the staff, planning commission and board of supervisors on the basis of the following criteria: The extent to which the broadcasting tower proposal conforms to the general special use permit criteria in section 30-19 of this ordinance, and the intent, application requirements, and general standards for broadcasting towers found in Use & Design Standards — Miscellaneous Uses these provisions. 2. The demonstrated willingness of the applicant to evaluate collocation opportunities within the proposed communication service area, and the demonstrated history of the applicant choosing collocation sites within the Roanoke Valley. 3. The base and top elevation of the proposed broadcasting tower relative to surrounding natural land forms. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, broadcasting tower locations below surrounding ridge lines are preferred. 4. Broadcasting tower locations already served by existing roads and utilities are preferred due to the potential detrimental environmental and visual impacts resulting from the construction of new road and utility corridors. Within the needed service area, the availability of other existing structures that are, based upon independent analysis, of suitable height, design, and location for the needed antenna. 6. The visibility of the broadcasting tower from the surrounding community and neighborhood compatibility of the tower as determined by the submitted computer simulations, terrain analysis and balloon or comparable test. 7. The degree to which the proposed tower location, site design and facilities including fencing, buildings and other ground mounted equipment and new or modified road, access or utility corridors are located, designed and constructed to be compatible with the neighborhood. (Ord. No. 82493-8, § 4, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 102798-12, § 1, 10-27-98) ON ROANOKE COUNTY - VIRGINIA v EST. 1838 TECHNICAL REVIEW SPECIAL USE PERMIT 2-4/2016 PROPOSED 150 -ft WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY APEX TOWERS Site Name: Hollins Road Verizon Site Name: Clearview At 5119 Hollins Road Roanoke, VA 24019 Submitted by: ATLANTIC TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANTS, INC. A Member of The Atlantic Group of Companies, Inc. ATC PROJECT #: 1100-11 February 26, 2016 THE ATLANTIC GROUP `\ ljj ❑F C©MPRN I E S EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Apex Towers (Wireless Communications Facility Provider) as agent for Verizon Wireless (Verizon) has made application to the County for the issuance of a Special Use Permit to allow construction of a new 150 -ft monopole telecommunications tower at 5119 Hollins Road, Roanoke, VA 24019. Verizon is an FCC Licensed provider of wireless communications services in the Roanoke County area and beyond. The property is owned by Mr. William H. Mistele, Trustee. The property is located at 5119 Hollins Road, Roanoke, VA 24019 on plat book 17, page 138 -tax parcel 039.09- 01-07.00-0000. The property is Zoned 1-2 (High Intensity Industrial District). The parcel is 4.58 acres. RECOMMENDATION This request for approval to construct a 154 -ft (150 -ft tower + 4 -ft lightning rod) monopole tower as proposed represents an appreciable intent on the part of the Applicant to conform to local, state and federal requirements has been met. It is therefore the Consultant's recommendation that this Application be approved on technical merit. This report outlines the specific areas of evaluation with respect to this proposal, and details this consultant's analysis regarding the site plans and proposal as presented. Supporting and clarifying evidence regarding the suitability of the proposed design in meeting the specified coverage goals is also included. George N. Condyles, IV President and COO Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc. Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc. Page 2 of 27 Mechanicsville, VA 1.0 TECHNICAL 1.1 Siting The proposed tower site is a 2,500 s.f. lease area of Industrial property situated within a 4.58 Acre parent parcel owned by Mr. William H. Mistele, Trustee. The property is located at 5119 Hollins Road, Roanoke, VA 24019. The property is Zoned 1-2 (High Intensity Industrial District). The parcel is referenced to Plat book 17, page 138 -tax parcel 039.09-01-07.00-0000. � J1 Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc. Page 3 of 27 Mechanicsville, VA The proposed project Site Plans were prepared by the firm of Mead & Hunt, LLP of 400 Tracy Way, Suite 200, Charleston, WV 25311. Meade & Hunt has provided accurate and precise Site Plans and Engineering advice for many years. The diagrams, maps, drawings and specifications are a product of Mr. Carl J. Bowyer, P.E. who is the Project Site Engineer. The Site Plans submitted by Mead & Hunt are professional and accurate and will be used in this report. k CARLOS DIRM -AJL Ws r ! iretl'l1tn'� - I rF7PT1, + F a � � : �'�� w f F P.O.B. (ACt1E$6RI17LRY'E9lE r WN I r ' PP,r2bD7eaa + t Cr + U fIJ)+ + BUU + J .EAS; w; ! 0' WOE urrury 6"9w6w 11 r }!! r FEHCAT CO.AS a F7.0 W DEE. r + f f BMW !ME Ar Fats£ su OJL L2 �f r PROPOSED CENTERLINE ,�` + 20' ADDEs9fl nUFFY EASMENT 0, 49 P EL A"Wi43 r I (13' EACH SI OE CENTERUNE) FAIT �'ALl1AMKM LErIF413TEE)UW. N20DOMM f rat�xa r fFbaA fr t'rtai,il' t sUxSY k. r r. WEPT ALgh ff AS RE nn Or r AUPAIOBMO 5J m AiP7�lAYs� ! alrsr. /�oaeo+sss iMN7' d + T fF 114 7Sav fr I F PARCEL IL:-: 039,0"t+QgAD 0000 f W rr DEMPAC.MDOM +F + too so o too 1M.0200830291 (3.126 ACIIIIIINS) f ' r I u¢a, — 100 r'tR'T Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc. Page 4 of 27 Mechanicsville, VA The proposed tower is a 150 -ft monopole tower placed within a 50'x 50' fenced compound. The site will be accessed from Carlos Drive. (See Detailed Site Plan below) PROMSED / so'x 59 (2,500 SO. FT.) LEASE AREA d JI FUTURE IT A 30 PROPOSED rj LEASE METERBOAR0 JI '. AREA �IER90N) I / / \ Jr IJ f FUTURE �/ ! . % 12' x 20 % J PROPOSED If f LEASE % L°� AREA LITIITYO�N (I EIEC. & i TELCO) 1 V l FUTURE~ { 12'x 2D' 4 LEASE AREA f PROPOSED 169 MONOPOLE TOMR i 7 ` TURNAROUND NOTE: l� AREA r ORIGIN OF UTILITY RUNS TO SITE SHALL BE DEiERMFNED BY THE I I 1 RESPECTIVE OTILITY PROOVE1R5. EXIS77AIG 20' WIRE i SANITARY EA5EMEN'r FOR j WESTERN VIRGINIA WATER i { A1JTHORITi' A5' RECORDED IN IN1,ARGEa SITE PLAN INST- jr20OW495j SCALE: i"= 20' The center of the proposed tower is located at coordinates 370 19' 44.9" N and 790 55' 32.5" W (NAD 83). Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc. Page 5 of 27 Mechanicsville, VA Mead"'A! &A 1 h+(irwl - lair. hu 40D Itm y %rf.. %twilc 1.00 (hali['flutl.lyw'S1 Vt(gin9a 15611 &Alunt Wi�i � :45-Iw71: to ttlhwttt wcwtn H 1 t. H t. A N 17 if [1 W F R !: Roanoke County, VA 2C Letter -Revised Site Name: HOLLINS ROAD Location: City: Roanoke, VA County: Roanoke U.S.G.S. Quadrangle: Roanoke, VA NAD 83) Latitude: N 37, 19'44.900" Longitude-- W 790 55'32,475" NAD 27) Latitude: N 37° 19' 44.411" Longitude: W 79, 55'33.334" Existing Site Elevation: 1042.4'+ AMSL Dale: February 23, 2015 I certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the horizontal and vertical datum is accurate to 2C Reporting requirements of ±50 feet horizontally and ±20 feet vertically. The horizontal datum (coordinates) are in terms of the North American Datum 1927 (NAD 27) and 1983 (NAD 83) and expressed as degrees, minutes and seconds, The vertical datura (heights) are in terms of the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) and are determined to the nearest lenth of a foot. O CARL J. BOWYER Lic. Na. 0402051626 �OIVAL' Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc. Page 6 of 27 Mechanicsville, VA 1.2 Topography The topography of this site is relatively flat. The ground elevation for the proposed tower is 1042' above sea level. The tower is proposed at 150' + a 4' Lightning Rod for an overall height of 154'. Combining the Ground elevation of 1042'+ 154' would give an Average Mean above Sea Level of 1196' AMSL. iii �.��,;�� .•` ��;� 4',+, Il j V 1 !`�`[''t`{`��yy� 911U 1 W. / ,'j l� t V % 0 " YYY VJ / 1Y`• If �[. � � r � ;' \ � • `� r d� rt 411 r } Mfr 4 l ..� �Y. N•1. {y\ '\ - ?'�"S.'� ili rS 4< ++ ! L INS �J'•r` f , t tl ,� \ J i ; 1i /i �rl.• 1 � + A G y I: fEi ! � .. _ ��G . � ! � .r �"'y 1.. '" � -. li �r/ I �rrn 3. ri(: f � � ",' 1.. �__-�- ,� � ,/ '�•! 'ti 11I IIS r � ' �r»c�`(•.� 1 .', f ® �� �. ".- ���' � Ir ✓ swr-,.e ro" 1 t i .:�,f f1 � � � j fl " � �,c\ 1 -LLL - I rA iY � •r.. IId � ;n Declination � aur i '.yr 1 r �01 ," j � � t,'•� (ol! Iffy ,.q R�sl*` rJ F S y. IL t •' j- . I Ij_ l � i �`,SI, '� '�` tifl.� . /�/11 7 N A•+I a: irYur: .�"E y�-.'I ,� Y G11f�Wti�+6e .r/ ( `iV�I t �,. •,: I ,,, I . , �w -AJC "�� `l ia.Y 5 -�• 'r6j{�, �� G.dr c:r�ar,e SCALE 1:24000 w II ll,li.I I 1 MILE qa ;` - -- 1OD0 YARDS MN $° 22' W U _ 1 KILOMETER Name: ROANOKE Location, 0371 19" 44.90" N 079' 55' 32.48" w Date: 02/23/15 Seale: 1 inch = 2,000 ft, The Consultant has reviewed the information supplied and concurs to the height of the tower as conditions relative to the topography. Site placement is adjacent to an existing Industrial Building and will be surrounded by 40' to 60' trees. The site has a natural tree buffer around it and will cause very little land disturbance. The site (as for the topography) is well suited and will serve many industrial and commercial facilities with advanced wireless broadband services. Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc. Page 7 of 27 Mechanicsville, VA Technology Background: Enhanced Verizon Services that Verizon will provide from this site Proposed Tower "HomeFusion" — LTE and AWS Service • 4G LTG R • rerrrrre�d • 1lra� 7N artemL • • • • • • • ■ Existing Homes Verizon Wireless HomeFusion Broadband A service that provides high-speed in-home Internet access leveraging the power and speed of the nation's largest 4G LTE network, will be available throughout the country. HomeFusion Broadband offers customers a reliable alternative for residential broadband, especially in areas with limited broadband choices. It provides connectivity Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc. Page 8 of 27 Mechanicsville, VA AV- % C} T I Thr nauorr bniau:ts wrrrss { UW%35 R YOV ho" ti Verizon Wireless HomeFusion Broadband A service that provides high-speed in-home Internet access leveraging the power and speed of the nation's largest 4G LTE network, will be available throughout the country. HomeFusion Broadband offers customers a reliable alternative for residential broadband, especially in areas with limited broadband choices. It provides connectivity Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc. Page 8 of 27 Mechanicsville, VA for a wide range of devices, including computers and gaming consoles, using the Verizon 4G LTE network, which is now available in 230 markets covering more than two-thirds of the population in the United States. "HomeFusion Broadband is another example of Verizon Wireless' commitment to providing their customers with the most innovative products and services," said Tami Erwin, vice president and chief marketing officer, Verizon Wireless. "With HomeFusion Broadband, customers across the United States, in towns large and small, will have the chance to link devices to the Internet and take advantage of the speed, coverage and connectivity offered by the Verizon 4G LTE network." How it works HomeFusion Broadband uses a professionally installed, cylinder -shaped antenna attached to a customer's home. The antenna's innovative design includes multiple internal antennae, allowing the device to pick up the best Verizon 4G LTE signal available and transmit it to a broadband router inside the home. The router can connect up to four wired and at least 20 wireless devices inside the home using Wi-Fi. In real-world, fully loaded network environments, Verizon 4G LTE customers, including HomeFusion Broadband customers, should experience average data rates of 5 to 12 megabits per second (Mbps) on the downlink and 2 to 5 Mbps on the uplink. 1.3 Setbacks The proposed site is over 325' from the nearest primary road, Rt. 601 Hollins Road, to the west. All property line setbacks required for this area have been observed in the drawing (Page L-1) of the enclosed site plans, including those with respect to adjacent property lines. As noted in the application package the proposed tower is approximately 75 feet from the nearest adjacent property line which is in compliance with the County's setback requirements using "Break Point Technology". "Break Point Technology" is a design objective for the tower manufacturer that prevents the tower from falling like a tree if there were to be a catastrophic failure within the structure. In this case, the manufacturer develops a design for the tower to "break" at the 60% or 90' AGL position and the top 60' feet fold upon the tower. The tower is designed by Robert L. Beacon, P.E. as stated in the structural document below. This tower meets the Setback requirements for structural failure. Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc. Page 9 of 27 Mechanicsville, VA Sabre Industries'" Towers and Poles May 28, 2014 Mr. David McClure Highland Towers 125 Whitestick Road Charleston, WV 25311 RE: Proposed 150' Sabre Monopole and Foundation for Roanoke site, Hollins Rd, Roanoke County, VA. Dear Mr. McClure, Upon receipt of order, we propose to design and supply a 150' monopole and foundation for the above referenced site_. The monopole and foundation are to be designed for a basic wind speed of 90 mph with no ice and 30 mph with 3/4' radial ice, Structure Class II, Exposure Category C, Topographic Category 1, in accordance with ANSIITIA/EIA 222-G, to support the following: • Twelve (12) SBNHH-1 D65B panel antennas on a 10' 3T -Boom C& 150' CL, with twelve (12) 1-5/8" lines; • Twelve (12) SBNHH-1 D65B panel antennas on a 10'3T -Boom @ 140' CL, with twelve (12) 1-5/8" lines; • Twelve (12) SBNHH-1 D65B panel antennas on a 10' 3T -Boom Cb 130' CL, with twelve (12) 1-5/8" lines, If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. Sincerely, Robert E. Beacom, P.E. Design Engineer II Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc. Page 10 of 27 Mechanicsville, VA 1.4 Co -Location While co -location is preferable to construction of a new site, with such co - location minimizing visual impact of telecommunications equipment on the surrounding area, no additional sites are available in the area which would meet the Applicant's coverage objectives. The Applicant has submitted a map and of existing tower sites within a 5 - mile radius of the proposed tower site. Verizon is essentially on all existing towers. This site is a fill-in site within the network. The service provider, Verizon, is seeking to fill in a hole in their digital coverage of the Rt. 601 & Rt. 11 corridor. This site is known as "Clearview" on the coverage maps provided by Verizon. The construction of the facility as proposed will verifiably meet the stated coverage objectives of the Applicant. The application makes detailed reference to all applicable points of consideration regarding County preference for co - location of equipment on existing structures versus new tower construction. 1.5 Structural The proposed 150' monopole tower design is of high strength steel, and represents a highly stable structural design not known by this consultant to have failed at any installation in this region. This structure, as proposed, is well within compliance of EIA/TIA-222-G guidelines for structures mandated ability to withstand the structural loading of all appurtenances, plus additional wind and ice loading. This tower structure, as proposed, would allow room for future co -location of at least two (2) additional wireless Land Mobile Radio carriers at the same site, minimizing the number of towers needed for all wireless telecommunications carriers to eventually optimize service in this area. The total design for the wireless land mobile radio carriers is three (3). Verizon at the top with other carriers at slots #2 and #3. Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc. Page 11 of 27 Mechanicsville, VA Furthermore, in conformance with the County, work at this site will remain in compliance with ALL federal, state, and local building codes and regulations if work proceeds as outlined in the application. The applicant's proposal includes site plans representing a soundly engineered design conforming to industry standards. 1.6 RF Exposure FCC bulletin OET-65 provides guidance for a licensee proposing to construct a telecommunications support structure in calculation of RF exposure limitations, including analysis of the cumulative effect of all transmitters on the structure. Appropriate steps, including warning signage at the site, will be taken Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc. Page 12 of 27 Mechanicsville, VA to protect both the general public and site workers from unsafe RF exposure in accordance with federal guidelines. Verizon has agreed in writing to be in compliance with all FCC requirements. The consultant sees no evidence of unsafe RF exposure levels being generated at this site if it were to proceed as proposed. RF site exposure warning signage placement is appropriately planned for this site. 1.7 Grounding Grounding of all structures and equipment at an RF site is critically important to the safety of both personnel and equipment at the site Even a single component not meeting this standard places all other site components at risk for substantial damage. All structures and equipment at the site should maintain a ground potential difference of less than 5 ohms. If construction proceeds as proposed, all structures and equipment shall be appropriately grounded and any obvious grounding deficiencies rectified for safety purposes and minimizina the potential for a situation to occur reauirina mitiaation. J l.�>aHl / itl11B f �/ FROPc� f R °a 'AA ecpvo9m �xYf^Ta � � \ V/ GRAPHIC SCALE L KV4 These concerns have been addressed within the Planning Drawings. Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc. Mechanicsville, VA Page 13 of 27 The Planning Drawings meet the NEC and Virginia Building Code requirements. 1.8 General Safety This site compound (50' x 50') will be surrounded by suitable 6 -ft high chain link fence with three strand barbed wire to prevent unauthorized access to the tower site, as clearly indicated in the proposed site plans. Additional safety measures to be placed at this site should include- - RF exposure warning signage - Site identification information - Routine and Emergency contact information - No Trespassing signs Furthermore, OSHA -approved style of fall prevention cable and an anti -climbing device shall be installed. 1.9 Interference The consultant sees no evidence of interference by or with this site after a general evaluation of the surrounding transmitter sites. Should any interference issues be posed with respect to this site, mitigation would nevertheless remain the responsibility of the FCC License Owner and affected carrier(s), and would be regulated by the Federal Communication Commission and/or the Federal Aviation Administration, having no effect or burden on the County. Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc. Page 14 of 27 Mechanicsville, VA iRY,EEI tS'.,rpg9, NPTriEflpl Y!}�no�nR�uxa S4!!4W 0.i tl IS0.4gF9.LV. aneForm�wrmsrawr 6T1@9 C.OS3FA0.WGRrGARF rt+[ SWFC'fF11GEfTARG IHIAIOWRR0.11� rBTN�/lC16HAF IIIISN.I�\R Itl4T SA�PGxT 1S ilAliM1lPD ivrn'a�Ex1Ei9PaXG, NAICF fIP6 F%+FUGFO ATA.Y MGtE £STAHMRa¢Y ;rilrtRaNn Fwn • , CMY.F PIE L� k � ,r �A, �. °�nt��.., Y' a��s�mvne non+r i�.ti w.caw�nn aoro�F xmr�wal ay;.. s; m�`xx.•xma�x ,�'�. k � ta��i A '�y5}�;' TGAiMEGkLi n�etn tFN5[]M1M1 Yt R ��i � e. MWME6d,IB� 1 2 �� FfN15M CRAUE .'. ti I� } oEruaariw� rRSP �xtFFx FF,._ {�� vnen�cnnour+u�ae+e l ...✓.4ltlaFlxulE wdRFn R v�.ptpfnyt�r LEC Hole l�,F�RplmnTk]IN¢f.WATR,1 @AIIIG lL1V iYH� CPOVOPoHG The Planning Drawings meet the NEC and Virginia Building Code requirements. 1.8 General Safety This site compound (50' x 50') will be surrounded by suitable 6 -ft high chain link fence with three strand barbed wire to prevent unauthorized access to the tower site, as clearly indicated in the proposed site plans. Additional safety measures to be placed at this site should include- - RF exposure warning signage - Site identification information - Routine and Emergency contact information - No Trespassing signs Furthermore, OSHA -approved style of fall prevention cable and an anti -climbing device shall be installed. 1.9 Interference The consultant sees no evidence of interference by or with this site after a general evaluation of the surrounding transmitter sites. Should any interference issues be posed with respect to this site, mitigation would nevertheless remain the responsibility of the FCC License Owner and affected carrier(s), and would be regulated by the Federal Communication Commission and/or the Federal Aviation Administration, having no effect or burden on the County. Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc. Page 14 of 27 Mechanicsville, VA 2.0 PROCEDUREAL 2.1 FAA Study A full FAA Study to determine potential Air Hazard requirements for this tower was submitted with this Application by Verizon. Mail Processing Center Aeronautical Study No. Federal Aviation Administration 2015 -AEA -5005 -OE Southwest Regional Office Obstruction Evaluation Group 10101 Hillwood Parkway Fort Worth, TX 76177 Issued Date: 09/23/2015 Network Regulatory Cellco Partnership 1120 Sanctuary Pkwy #150, GASASREG Alpharetta, GA 30009 xx DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AER NAVIGATION ** The Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C., Section 44718 and if applicable Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 77, concerning: Structure: Monopole Cloverdale Location: Roanoke, VA Latitude: 37-20-36.00N NAD 83 Longitude: 79-55-02.18W Heights: 1251 feet site elevation (SE) 199 feet above ground level (AGI.) 1450 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) This aeronautical study revealed that the structure does not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a ' hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s), if any, is(are) met: It is required that FAA Form 7460-2, Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, be e -filed any time the project is abandoned or: At least 10 days prior to start of construction (7460-2, Part 1) _X_ Within 5 days after the construction reaches its greatest height (7460-2, Part 2) Based on this evaluation, marking and lighting are not necessary for aviation safety. However, if marking/ lighting are accomplished on a voluntary basis, we recommend it be installed and maintained in accordance with FAA Advisory circular 70/7460-1 K Change 2. This determination expires on 03/23/2017 furless: (a) the construction is started (not necessarily completed) and FAA Form 7460-2, Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, is received by this office. (b) extended, revised, or terminated by the issuing office. (c) the construction is subject to the licensing authority of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and an application for a construction permit has been filed, as required by the FCC, within 6 months of the date of this determination. In such case, the determination expires on the date prescribed by the FCC for completion of construction, or the date the FCC denies the application. Page 1 of 3 Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc. Page 15 of 27 Mechanicsville, VA NOTE: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THIS DETERMINATION MUST BE E -FILED AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE. AFTER RE-EVALUATION OF CURRENT OPERATIONS IN THE AREA OF THE STRUCTURE TO DETERMINE THAT NO SIGNIFICANT AERONAUTICAL CHANGES HAVE OCCURRED, YOUR DETERMINATION MAY BE ELIGIBLE FOR ONE EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD. This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates, heights, frequency(ies) and power. Any changes in coordinates, heights, and frequencies or use of greater power will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration, including increase to heights, power, or the addition of other transmitters, requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derricks, etc., which may be used during actual construction of the structure. However, this equipment slrall not exceed the overall heights as indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structa e requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, State, or local government body. Any failure or malfunction that lasts more than thirty (30) minutes and affects a top light or flashing obstruction light, regardless of its position, should be reported immediately to (877) 487-6867 so a Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) can be issued. As soon as the normal operation is restored, notify the same number. A copy of this determination will be forwarded to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) because the structure is subject to their licensing authority. If we can be of further assistance, please contact our office at (817) 222-5922. On any future correspondence concerning this matter, please refer to Aeronautical Study Number 2015 -AEA -5005 -OE. Signature Control No: 262359844-266566580 (DNE ) Debbie Cardenas Technician Attachnrent(s) Frequency Data cc: FCC 2.2 FCC Antenna Site Registration This tower is not required to be registered. Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc. Page 16 of 27 Mechanicsville, VA 2.3 Environmental Impacts The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), delineated in Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1, Subpart I, sections 1.1301-1.1319, requires federal agencies to incorporate environmental considerations into their decision-making process when evaluating new construction proposals. As a licensing agency, the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) requires all licensees to consider the potential environmental effects from their construction of antenna support structures, and to disclose those effects in an Environmental Assessment (EA) that must be filed with the FCC for review. Site Name: VAOHRT 11 -M -S ]toad Site Type: Raw Land Contact Perm David McClure Contact Phone: 304-256-6426 FCG[s'EPA ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE CIRECKLIST AApexTowE-rs FCC Caory Lead eacia Yes I No Documentation/(A Officially Desipmad Wilderness Area; National Some m Historic Trails Flational Pak Serri.,USForen Serci«,BureauofLand Man 9—L National Wilderness Preservarieu System 6 HDR NEPA Check dated 911115(A) Officially Desicnated Wildlife Preserve US Fish & Wildlife Service (US FW'S), National Wildlife la FDR NEPA CIreek dated 911115: Refuge System Th—lened or Endangered Sped" eqCritical Habitats US Fish& Wildlife ScM:c' VA Department ofConservadon El VADCR res p: 5e daed &24115 (S) and Re—ion (VADCR) NOTE: all hers should be felled before 1]!15115 or ager 3131116 iNinkholer, m itis, disappeaL Sirearat 1 rge m ' rn are found during comb action eal1544-I1p-$964 il WROrndorft@der.sti No MPonse from Maest 10 VADGIF or USFWS, per VAOCR letter WaC T.. Rrarauce Report (USFWS oobne) daced 7130115 USFWS- V A off.ce generic guidance letter lord 9/14f00 USFWS lin of Rig species for pmjaat site dated 7!30/15 Historic Structures VA Dcparmrenr offfistmic Rcsources(VASHPO) ® VASHPOclearancel tte,dated BRg/15-Ne Adverxal&a(C) a Farm 620 Additional Resources Informationrequested by VA SHPO No response to request sem to Roanoke County Planing Commission - Hnnins Llifuict No response m mcimt sem m History Museum of Wce e,a Virginia Inch. Religious Sites VA SHPO, THPOs IS TCNS dead 712W15 -129587(D) Nati. of prganizntins dated 7131115 Affidavit fm legal notice in the Roanoke Times on 811)15 NACD Query fm VA- Roanoke County THPOr-tribal clear c -give., ikiaware Vadoa an ]awls Eranm Shnwocc Tribe on 9114115 Shawtrce Tribe n 9/1565 Cnmwbn hoLli n N.1— as 9/9/I5 Parise f Arckneology 5,—,y Rep—dated 729115 F1acd lain hE14.A 8 Flood Ma ) Wetlands National Werlaud iuventary Mapping, US FWS M EDRNEPA Check dated 911/15 fA) and wedmd m rp(E) W Inrensit Whi[eli Contact provided -ckil pi N/A wive Radio F[equ Radiation Courser la MIA R Nmideaaon FCC NPM-1--t- a amxquhed far to —lex than 199 -fen Site 1—d... Map-FSgerr 1 Slte Pima - Figme 2 Soil Map- Figure 3 d Prepared by: MeaTrac? Way, Suite 200, Chaclastoa, W V 25311 Date: 10/72015 Mead Title: Sr_ Envimomeotal Project Munger Med riPrinted uame: Teaesa A, Schuller Signature: �� �' The Consultant has read and has researched the data provided and believes the study to be accurate and that the consultant concurs that there are No Adverse Environmental Effects to the construction of this wireless communications facility. Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc. Page 17 of 27 Mechanicsville, VA 2.4 Historic Impacts Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA) requires that State Historic Preservation Offices (SHPO) and the President's Advisory Council on Historic Preservation be given a reasonable opportunity to comment on all undertakings with the potential to affect historic properties. Prior to construction, the licensee is required to submit to the SHPO a detailed description of the project, a listing of local historic resources, and a discussion of any measures being undertaken to mitigate impacts (if any) on historic resources. Upon receipt, the SHPO has thirty (30) days to review and respond to those submissions. All agencies with authority to permit construction are required to consider the SHPO response in its decision making process with respect to new construction applications. The Consultant has reviewed the Section 106 Report and the data thus presented and concurs with the Applicant and VDHR that there are No Adverse Effects in the Preservation Area. I MAP FINDINGS,SUMMARY The databases searched In this report are listed below. Database descriptions and other agency contact information Is canlalmd In Ins Hap Cnnl9016 and Oovsmmenl Records S®arehetl section Or, papa 22 of this report. TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS HOLLINS ROAD VAROHR7 Inquiry 9: 4399470.M 5119 HOLT ROAD Dale: Oft P6 ROANDME, VA 24049 TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES Latilude (No i 37.320102 - 37° 10' 44.8:' Long Rude (West): 79.925697 • 79' 55 32.5 Universal Tranverse Mereata. Zorn 17 UTM X (Maters): 695177.2 UTM Y (Meters): 4131718.5 Sasreh Distance LVlthm Within Applicable Regulation ham 47 CFRIFCC Checklist Database (Miles) Search 118 Mlle NATURAL AREAS MAP 1.1307a t1) Olhdally Designated Wlldeme- Area 1.1307a (2j O51clally Deslgnaled Wildlife Preserve 1.1 W7a (3) Thveatened or Endangered Species or Critical Habitat 1.1 W7a )2) -claly Des lgnated Wildlife Preserve 1.1307a (2) ONldaly Designated Wildlife Preserve 1.1307a )3) Threatened or Endangered Species or Crl lical Habitat HISTORIC SITES MAP 1.1307a (4) Listed or eltgit4 for Naaona€ Register I.IW7e (4) Listed a elaibte far National Register FLOODPLAIN MAP 1.1307 {0 Located Ina Flood Plain WETLANDS MAP 1,1307 (7} Change in surface tazturas (weland fill) FCC E FAA SITES MAP Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc. Mechanicsville, VA US Faderal Lands US Federal Lands VA Endangered Spades VA Wildlife Areas VA Conservation Lands Counts Endangered Spades VA Historic Sites National Register or Wtat. Pia Indian Reservation APPAL TRAIL FLCODPLAth1 NWI 1.00 NO NO 1.00 NO NO 1.00 YES YES 1.00 NO NO 4.00 NO NO County YES NIA 1.00 YES NO 1,00 YES NO 1.00NO NO I.00 NO NO 1.00 YES NO 1.00 NO NO celular 1.011 NO NO 40 Cellular 1.00 NO NO Antenna Structure Reglslraden 1.00 YES NO Towers 100 NO NO AM Antenna 1.00 NO NO FM Antenna 1.00 NO NO FAA DOF 1.00 NO NO Alrports 1-00 NO - Pawer Lines 1.00 YES - Page 18 of 27 Teresa Schuller From: towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 4:45 PM To: Teresa Schuller Subject: Section 106 Notification of 5HPOJTHPO Concurrence- Email ID #1376382 This is to notify you that the Lead SHPOfTHPO has concurred with the following filing: Date of Action: 08!28!2015 Direct Effect: No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE Visual Effect: No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE Comment Text: We believe that the undertaking will have No Adverse Effect on historic properties listed in or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, specifically the Rudd House (080-0417) and the Christian Nininger House (080-0034). Chris Novelli Virginia Department of Historic Resources File Number: 0006895738 TCNS Number: 129557 Purpose: Update Original Purpose: New Tower Submission Packet Notification Date: 7AM EST 08/06!2015 Applicant: Apex Towers, LLC Consultant: Mead & Hunt, Inc. Positive Train Control Filing Subject to Expedited Treatment Under Program Comment: No Site Name: Hollins Road (VAROHRI) Site Address: Hollins Road Detailed Description of Project: Site Coordinates: 37-19-44.9 N, 79-55-32.5 W City: Roanoke County: ROANOKE State:VA Lead SHPOfMPO: Virginia Department of Historic Resources NOTICE OF FRAUDULENT USE OF SYSTEM, ABUSE OF PASSWORD AND RELATED MISUSE Use of the Section 106 system is intended to facilitate consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable laws. Any person having access to Section 106 information shall use it only for its intended purpose. Appropriate action will be taken with respect to any misuse of the system. Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc. Page 19 of 27 Mechanicsville, VA 2.5 Radio Frequency Coverage Analysis Applicant's Data Verizon is proposing to co -locate on the Applicant's150-ft monopole tower. This tower will address the lack of 4-G/AWS coverage along Rt. 601 & Rt. 11. This site will be known as "Clearwater" from Verizon's networking naming of their transceiver sites. The Verizon network is surrounded by several "handoff" sites. - North: Cloverdale at 150' AGL.(Pending Approval) - South: Plantation Road —Existing - North-West: Tinker Mountain — Existing - South -East: Vinton- Existing - South-West: Peters Creek — Existing - East: Bonsack — Existing The Observer can see how significant the "hole" is and how this area of the county is underserved. (See page 26.) This site fills in the underserved areas of marginal to weak service for data. The Consultant concurs with the Applicant's data and plans as presented concerning filling in this underserved area for data service. Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc. Page 20 of 27 Mechanicsville, VA 3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS This request for approval to construct a 150 -ft monopole tower with 4' lightning rod as proposed represents an appreciable intent on the part of the Applicant to conform to all applicable federal, state, and local regulations. The Consultant recommends that the County approve the Application/Request for issuance of a Special Use Permit to allow construction of this site. In closing, this consultant remains available to address any comments or questions which may arise following review of this report. Any interested party with such comments or questions may feel free to contact this firm, which remains committed to delivering independent, objective, unbiased, and thorough consulting services. Respectfully submitted, George N. Condyles, IV, CPM President & COO Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc. Page 21 of 27 Mechanicsville, VA Project location Intersection of Rt. 601 and Rt. 616 Atlantic Technology Consultants, Inc. Page 22 of 27 Mechanicsville, VA R 7 a) 4-0 i5 � W le 0 r. cc 0 w \ \ / $ { § § 7 » 3 f � \7e ■ ■ � f 2 . o � §. § § %§ \2 2 \ - 7 ) � §. ■ # . m - c •Ix\ \ ;. �\Q | U) $, , - ) )§ u ! k � \ � � \ \ / Lo r 04 r ti CV r +C7 r A H CD m R� t m •r••+ vi yL W T 0 U J Q �t T L CD r0 MEV 0 E 0 CD m L 0 0 aL 0 L a. a� a T., c 0 0 U of 0 U H V) U U C U Q � �� �-cam {�- � �i - • riTi�� ij ■ e 16 4117 - ES6 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 2016 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A BROADCASTING TOWER (CELL TOWER) APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET IN HEIGHT IN A 1-2, HIGH INTENSITY INDUSTRIAL, DISTRICT ON A 4.58 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED AT 5119 HOLLINS ROAD, HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, UPON THE PETITION OF DAVID B. MCCLURE (APEX TOWERS, LLC AGENT) WHEREAS, David B. McClure, agent for Apex Towers, LLC, has filed a petition for a special use permit for broadcasting tower use at 5119 Hollins Rd. (Tax Parcel No.039.09-01-07.00-0000), in an 1-2, high intensity industrial district, in the Hollins Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 5, 2016; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends approval of the petition with the conditions that the total height of the tower shall not exceed 154 feet and the tower shall not be illuminated with any type of lighting apparatus, unless lighting is required by the Federal Aviation Administration; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on March 22, 2016; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on April 26, 2016. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to David B. McClure, agent for Apex Towers, LLC, for broadcasting tower use on a 4.58 acre parcel located at 5119 Hollins Road (Tax Parcel No.039.09-01-07.00-0000), in the Hollins Page 1 of 2 Magisterial District, is substantially in accord with the adopted 2005 Community Plan, as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and that it shall have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood or community, and said special use permit is hereby approved with the following condition: (a) The total height of the tower shall not exceed 154 feet, and (b) The tower shall not be illuminated with any type of lighting apparatus, unless lighting is required by the Federal Aviation Administration. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The provisions of this special use permit are not severable. Invalidation of any word, phrase, clause, sentence or paragraph shall invalidate the remainder. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. Page 2 of 2