Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4/25/2017 - RegularINVOCATION: Pastor Josh Coldren Crossroads Church Roanoke County Board of Supervisors April 25, 2017 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES FLAG Disclaimer: "Any invocation that may be offered before the official start of the Board meeting shall be the voluntary offering of a private citizen, to and for the benefit of the Board. The views or beliefs expressed by the invocation speaker have not been previously reviewed or approved by the Board and do not necessarily represent the religious beliefs or views of the Board in part or as a whole. No member of the community is required to attend or participate in the invocation and such decision will have no impact on their right to actively participate in the business of the Board." Page 1 of 5 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Agenda April 25, 2017 Good afternoon and welcome to our meeting for April 25, 2017. Regular meetings are held on the second and fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Thursday at 7:00 p.m. and on Saturday at 4:00 p.m. Board of Supervisors meetings can also be viewed online through Roanoke County's website at www.RoanokeCountvVA.gov. Our meetings are closed -captioned, so it is important for everyone to speak directly into the microphones at the podium. Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance. Please turn all cell phones off or place on silent. A. OPENING CEREMONIES 1. Roll Call B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS D. BRIEFINGS E. NEW BUSINESS Page 2 of 5 F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCE -CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of these items does not indicate support for, or judge the merits of, the requested zoning actions but satisfies procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will be held after recommendation by the Planning Commission. - 1 . ommission: 1. The petition of Lexington Falls, LLC to rezone approximately 1.67 acres to amend a proffered condition on property zoned C-2CS, High Intensity Commercial, District with conditions and special use permit and to rezone 0.68 acre from C-1, Low Intensity Commercial, District to C-2, High Intensity Commercial, District. The amended proffer references general conformance to a revised concept plan showing additional parking and a new access drive on Burlington Drive for an existing Bojangles restaurant. The property is located at 6065 Peters Creek Road and in the 6100 block of Burlington Drive, Hollins Magisterial District G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance accepting and appropriating $200,000 to the Roanoke County Public Schools from the sale of surplus computer equipment (Jeff Terry, Chief Information Officer, RCPS) H. APPOINTMENTS 1. Budget and Fiscal Affairs (BFAC)(appointed by District and At -Large) 2. Economic Development Authority (EDA)(appointed by District) 3. Library Board (appointed by District) I. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY 1. Approval of minutes — February 28, 2017 2. Request to accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $13,928.80 from the Office of Emergency Medical Services for the Emergency Medical Services Grant 3. Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to Kyle E. Schirmer, Police Officer -Sergeant, upon his retirement after more than twenty years of service Page 3 of 5 4. Confirmation of appointment to the Roanoke Valley Greenway (At Large); Local Office on Aging (LOA) (At Large) J. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS K. REPORTS 1. Unappropriated, Board Contingency and Capital Reserves Report 2. Outstanding Debt Report 3. Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Revenues as of March 31, 2017 4. Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Expenditures and Encumbrances as of March 31, 2017 5. Accounts Paid - March 31, 2017 6. Treasurer's Statement of Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy as of February 28, 2017 7. Treasurer's Statement of Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy as of March 31, 2017 L. WORK SESSIONS 1. Work session to review with the Board of Supervisors the proposed fiscal year 2018-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) (Thomas C. Gates, County Administrator; Christopher R. Bever, Director, Management and Budget) EVENING SESSION M. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. The petition of Richard Rife, Rife + Wood Architects, to rezone approximately 0.374 acre from R-1, Low Density Residential, District to C-1, Low Intensity Commercial, District, located at 3722 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District (Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning) N. CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS O. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 1. P. Jason Peters 2. George G. Assaid 3. Al Bedrosian 4. Martha B. Hooker 5. Joseph P. McNamara Page 4 of 5 P. ADJOURNMENT Page 5 of 5 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: April 25, 2017 The petition of Lexington Falls, LLC to rezone approximately 1.67 acres to amend a proffered condition on property zoned C-2CS, High Intensity Commercial, District with conditions and special use permit and to rezone 0.68 acre from C-1, Low Intensity Commercial, District to C-2, High Intensity Commercial, District. The amended proffer references general conformance to a revised concept plan showing additional parking and a new access drive on Burlington Drive for an existing Bojangles restaurant. The property is located at 6065 Peters Creek Road and in the 6100 block of Burlington Drive, Hollins Magisterial District Philip Thompson Deputy Director of Planning Thomas C. Gates County Administrator Consent agenda item for first reading of an ordinance. BACKGROUND: The first reading on this ordinance is accomplished by adoption of this ordinance in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions; rather, approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on this ordinance is scheduled for May 23, 2017. The title of this ordinance is as follows: 1. The petition of Lexington Falls, LLC to rezone approximately 1.67 acres to Page 1 of 2 amend a proffered condition on property zoned C-2CS, High Intensity Commercial, District with conditions and special use permit and to rezone 0.68 acre from C-1, Low Intensity Commercial, District to C-2, High Intensity Commercial, District. The amended proffer references general conformance to a revised concept plan showing additional parking and a new access drive on Burlington Drive for an existing Bojangles restaurant. The property is located at 6065 Peters Creek Road and in the 6100 block of Burlington Drive, Hollins Magisterial District. DISCUSSION: There is no discussion on this agenda item. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of this rezoning ordinance for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for May 23, 2017. 2. That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Item(s) 1, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Page 2 of 2 County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 For Staff Use Onl received;; f RegQiyedby: Placards issued: I BOS Case Number �J -- � / ao \-I ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) N Rezoning ❑ Special Use ❑ Variance ❑ Waiver ❑ Administrative Appeal ❑ Comp Plan (15.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address w/zip Phone: 540-537-6194 Lexington Falls LLC c/o Stan Seymour Work: g � y Cell #: 5942 Coleman Road Roanoke, VA 24018 Fax No.: Owner's name/address w/zip Phone #: Same as above Work. Fax No. #: Property Location 6065 Peters Creek Road & Magisterial District: Hollins 0 Burlington Drive Community Planning area: Peters Creek --Hollins Tax Map No.: 027.13-05-01.00-00001027.13-05-02.00-0000 Existing Zoning: C2 -High intensity Comm. Distdct 1 Cl- Low Intensity Comm. District Size of parcel(s): Acres: 1.67 10.0$ = 2.35 Existing Land use: Fast Food Restaurant 1 Vacant REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW APPLICANTS (R/S(W/CP) Proposed Zoning: C2 - High Intensity Commercial District Proposed Land use: Fast Food Restaurant & Access Drive Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes C)( No J IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes X No ❑ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes X No ❑ VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (WW/AA) 34 ? Variance/Waiver of Section(s) n!a of the Roanoke County Zonin Q mance in order to: a s� Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Q Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Or ce j �N Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL -NOT B CEPTED IF ANY HESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. .213/5lW/CP VIAA RIS/W/CP V/AA R/SIFVICP VIAA Consultation 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan Application fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Eii Justification Wa r and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the prop the own is agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent f the owner. [f� Owner's Signature 2 JUSTIFICATION FORREZONI..NG., SPECIAL USE PERMIT;WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW REQUESTS Applicant Lexington Falls, LLC (Lexington Falls, LLC - Access Drive) The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. See attached narrative Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. See attached narrative Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. See attached narrative 3 LEXINGTON FALLS, LLC — ACCESS DRIVE Tax ID's: 027.13-05-01.00-0000 & 027.13-05-02.00-0000 Justification for Rezoning: 1. This rezoning request has two parts. The first part is the amendment of the proffered condition on Tax ID: 027.13-05-01.00-0000 (6065 Peters Creek Road) to allow for the construction of an employee parking area and access drive across Tax ID: 027.13-05- 02.00-0000 (0 Burlington Drive). The second part is for the rezoning of Tax ID 027.13-05-02.00-0000 from Cl- Low Intensity Commercial District to C2 — High Intensity Commercial District. Both parcels were rezoned in 2006 under Ordinance 121906-7 to allow for the Bojangles restaurant construction. The Bojangles restaurant has seen continued growth since its construction, as has this area of Roanoke County with many development projects inclose proximity. During peak restaurant hours, parking is limited and there is additional parking needed to meet customer demands and prevent traffic issues on- site. Therefore the employee parking area is being proposed on the south side of the site. The existing Traffic Impact Analysis provided in 2006 has been updated for the current request. It is important to note that the daily vehicle traffic based on the original study was 973 vehicles per day. Based on current customer receipts from Bojangles, the actual vehicles per day is an average of 775. This request is being made based on the needs of the existing Bojangles restaurant currently in operation at 6065 Peters Creek Road. The additional parking is needed based on peak restaurant parking demands. The secondary access point will aid patrons access the site during inclement weather, will include additional parking for vehicles with landscape trailers, and will give vehicles traveling westbound on Peters Creek Road (Route 117) an additional access option at a safer signal controlled intersection. The proposed access location from tax parcel 027.13-05-02.00-0000 onto Burlington Drive is located at the northern section of right of way adjacent to the termination of Burlington Drive right of way at tax parcel 027.13-05-05.00. This location has adequate sight distance for vehicular movements and the location of the entrance provides a "T" turn around area for Burlington Drive. The entrance provides also for better connectivity, which is a priority of VDOT's secondary street connection requirements. The access drive will be in compliance with requirements as set forth by the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and the plans will be reviewed and approved by all required local review agencies during the design process. 2. This project is located within the Hollins Community Planning Area of Roanoke County. Although the only improvements proposed at this time are the small parking area and access drive, any future improvements will incorporate the overall aesthetic value of the existing commercial development and the goals of the community planning area. 3. The entrance location of the access drive on Burlington Drive will create a minimal increase in the number of vehicles that access Bojangles from Burlington Drive. The vast majority of vehicles will still enter/exit the Bojangles Restaurant site from Peters Creek Road which provides full access to and from Peters Creek Road. This proposed drive will also allow public and private vehicles a location to turn around at the existing termination point of Burlington Drive where there is currently not an area to do so. Fire and Rescue will have better access to the area and maneuverability with the addition of the access drive. CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan_ Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (152-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS X a. Applicant name and name of development X b. Date, scale and north arrow X c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions X d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties X e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. X f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties X g. All property lines and easements X h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights X i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development X j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS X k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site X 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers X m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals X n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections X o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants X p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed X q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that PI items required in the checklist above are complete. Signature ofplicaV- Date t3 p0AVp� F Community Development = Planning & Zoning Division � A2 1838 NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Effective date: April 19, 2005 Lexington Falls LLC - (Lexington Falls LLC -Access Drive) Name of Petition Petitioner's Signature Date TRAFFIC STUDY FOR LEXINGTON FALLS, LLC - ACCESS DRIVE Tax I D: 027.13-05-01.00-0000 6065 Peters Creek Road 027.13-05-02.00-0000 0 Burlington Drive ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA B&A PROJECT #04160013.00 DATE: March 17, 2017 AND ASSOCIATES INC REFLECTING TOIVIDF2ROW PLANNERS ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Phone (540) 772-8050 Existina Daily and Peak Hour Traffic on Peters Creek Road — Route 117: 2015 VDOT published data (please see Attachment 11 AADT = 19,000 Directional Factor = 0.508 (NB) K Factor = 0.092 Existing Peak Hour Traffic Data 888 vph (860 vph) 40 Peters Creek SB Peters Creek NB 860 vph (888 vph) KEY SITE 00 vph =AM PH (00 vph) = PM PH Potential Site Generated Traffic: This trip generation calculation was based on the proposed land use shown on a concept plan created by Balzer and Associates (please see Attachment 2). The policies and procedures found in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, were employed to determine the potential site generated traffic volumes for the proposed development. Traffic volumes for the average weekday and weekday peak hours of the adjacent street traffic are provided and illustrated in the Table and Figure below, respectively. Please note that the trip generation calculation below takes into account 10,000 s.f. of possible General Office space on the rear parcel to plan for any future requirements of the property. 1 Trip Generation Land Use AM PEAK HR PM PEAK HOUR DAILY Proposed ITE Independent Development Code Variable Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Total Fast Food Rest. wl Drive 934: 3,534 sq. ft 82 79 161: 60 55 115 .1,753.` Through General 710 10,000 sq_ ft..:. 26 4 30 3 12 15.::. 228 Office TOTAL 108 83 999 63 67 130 1,981 Trip Distribution: For the purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that 90% of trips for the fast food restaurant will enter and exit from Peters Creek Road and that 50% of trips for the office use will enter and exit from Peters Creek Road. The remaining trips will utilize the proposed access on Burlington Drive. As such, the expected site -generated traffic to utilize Burlington Drive is approximately 289 trips, or 145 vehicles, per day. It should be noted that the rear parcel is currently zoned C-1 and the proposed cross access drive gives traffic from this parcel an access point to the site without having to utilize Burlington Drive. 2 Projected Daily and Peak Hour Site Generated Traffic Data ................................ Peters Creek Rd, Rfe 117 87 vph 73 vph (55 vph) (55 vph) KEY 00 vph =AM PH (00 vph) = PM PH ADT = 2,045 vpd SITE 10 vph t 21 vph (12 vph) I (8 vph) Burlington Dr, Rte 1828 Summary: Based on the data provided, the assumptions made, and the potential site -generated traffic (including potential site generated traffic for future office development), the results of the analysis are: Approximately 289 trips, or 145 vehicles, per day are anticipated to be added to Burlington Drive. • The increase in traffic is mitigated by providing a cross -access that allows the future commercial development to access the site via Peters Creek Road through the Bojangles property. 0 1 `►' LL Q LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL ¢ LL 0 7j O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 7 co N m r C2 O co N O Q M N N p 07N co LO cc co LD n M Cb L Q CIO In LO �: � LlJ Lq Lq Lq LC7 47 LQ LL o a 0 0 0 0 0 n n 0 0 0 Y Q p m n Lnco m n n co o In m m m N m n o N m co N m V p Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 LL o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U C� LL U LL LL U LL Li- LL LL. L.E.. LL c� a 0 a a o oo o o a -80 o a a a o a a o a � N 4 4 p o Q [S p p O p O O \a Y F N NN N a o r r r r D r � 4J ~ x Q \ \ O_ \ \a T \ O \ O \ O \° O \° O O O O .F r O Q O O O O O O D c7 D a) x Q O - - O - O -.10 O O O O O O � � N r r r O CCn 0 \a O \a O \° O \a O \a O \a O \ O \ O \a O \° 6 \° a O C (D I!) ? a o o a o a o 0 o a o o W m tf co m to rn co rn co rn to m w rn co os n cn n w n rn n rn n m n rn N wa a Q LL Q LL Ll. LL LL P4 y LL LL. r4 LL LL N C p In a) ,� F- ❑ a a CS V'- o a O o c o O � X o a O N N -a ,`p 0 o O a s o o o � a © F a o O a 0 o O a o o a 0 W N O 7 Cll C N— .0 a a U M d C7 ,�- o h c u U ai r '.L' w FQ r o N v T r > u �r �n a `�' N 7 r o 0CL LLf ❑ U j U -1 C -C O o O ro CO o N"t _ C9 o ➢- f• N cO z LC] c] CV Q f- p CU O O r O O O N O O O O ccC E LY 2�co c k Q a m m Q m m as `0 e m `, 0 m m 0 '1 m Y m Y c 7 C C C ❑ 'U O C cV � O C I6 O C I6 O 0 E C - C6 LL O C f� c` 0 O C c - IL7 O '- C O O C O O C C4 O .. C 4 CIS O g C- R C6 C 0 .. Q O O m O LL ❑ m O CC O m O x 0 Ir O c: 11 0 Cc Y D N O 4 O O O O O P O Q Q O N '5 U 0 0 0 0 0 U U U L3 o y U m Q m za m Q m ¢ m O m 0 Ls.i a F O O J a m x U x ami U x ami C3 x ami U x m U x ami U ¢ ly ❑ d' C}' Cyn N co N N DDDDDDDDDDDDWD J Ca d d a- 2 Q d CC T O O O N ME JAL 0 y U CL E 3D vi spin JAL Q O D PC 0 _a U 0 O O O N 0 0 ME JlL O Zti D PC Petitioner/Property Owner: Lexington Falls, LLC 6960 Coleman Road Roanoke, VA 24018 Request: Amendment of Proffered condition for C2CS Zoning for subject tax parcel Tax Map #: 027.13-05-01.00-000 The following proffered condition is prodded for the above referenced Zoning Request Proffered Condition: 1. The developer hereby proffers general conformance with the "Lexington Falls, LLC -- Access Drive", prepared by Balzer and Associates, Inc. dated March 17, 2017. Lexington Falls, LLC: Printed: fxnovl-- Signed: 040—vk��� Title W R -Ig Date : -�/7// � LEXINGTON FALLS LLC — ACCESS DRIVE: ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS OF: 0 Burlington Drive (Tisa#:27.13-05-02.00) Parcel ID: 027.13-05-03.00 Property Address: 6251 Peters Creek Road MAPSICO LIMITED COMPANY 3625 Ridgewood Lane Roanoke, VA 24014 Zoning: C 1 Parcel ID: 027.13-05-04.00 Property Address: 0 Peters Creek Road MAPSICO LIMITED COMPANY 3625 Ridgewood Lane Roanoke, VA 24014 Zoning: C I Parcel ID: 027.1305-05.00 Property Address: 0 Burlington Drive HAROLD F TRENT JR; CHERYL TRENT TICKLE 408 High Street Salem, VA 24153 Zoning C 1 C Parcel ID: 027.17-04-06.00 Property Address: 6155 Burlington Drive HUNTER P TOLLEY 6155 Burlington Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 Zoning: R3 Parcel ID: 027.17-04-07.00 Property Address: 6143 Burlington. Drive KEYNET INC. 383 Heritage Drive Blue Ridge, VA 24064 Zoning: R3 Parcel ID: 027.17-04-05.00 Property Address: 0 Burlington Drive DKE HOLDINGS LLC 6045 Peters Creek Road Roanoke, VA 24019 Zoning: C 1 Parcel ID: 027.17-04-01.00 Property Address: 6045 Peters Creek Road DKE HOLDINGS LLC 6045 Peters Creek Road Roanoke, VA 24019 Zoning: C1 Parcel ID: 027.17-06-62.02 Property Address: 6120 Peters Creek Road JONES INVESTMENT VENTURES 3324 Timber -view Road Roanoke, VA 24019 Zoning: C 1 C Parcel ID: 027.17-06-62.00 Property Address: 6136 Peters Creek Road MT HOLDING CO 102 N Mitchell Road Roanoke, VA 24179 Zoning: C2 Parcel ID: 027.17-06-61.00 Property Address: 6206 Peters Creek Road SCIATICA LLC 708 Draper Road Blacksburg, VA 24060 Zoning: C2 Parcel ID: 027.17-06-60.00 Property Address: 6212 Peters Creek Road JACOB H PHAM 6212 Peters Creek Road Roanoke, VA 24019 Zoning: C2 2 Mapsico Limited Company 205 N. Wilton Road Richmond Virginia 23225 Board of Supervisors Roanoke County, Virginia 5204 Bernard Drive P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Re: Rezoning Petition Lexington Falls LLC Dear Board Member: Mapiso Limited Company ("Mapsico") is the owner of two parcels (numbers 027.13-05- 03.00-0000 and 027.13-05-04.00-0000) adjacent to two parcels awned by Lexington Falls, LLC (numbers 027.13-05-01.00-00000 and 027.13-05-02.00-0000), which are scheduled to be rezoned for the purpose of allowing an access drive for a fast food restaurant to Burlington Drive. Please be advised that Mapsico does not object to the rezoning of parcels 027.13-05- 01.00-00000 and 027.13-05-02.00-0000 to allow such access. Mapisco Limited Company I & 4, " —./,z , / J, Fielding Douthat, Jr., ember bNDAL/M ASSOCIATES INC. M, RFFj-FC71NG TOMORROW Roanoke County Tax Parcel Numbers 027.1305-01.00 & 027.13-05-02.00 Legal Description for property to be rezoned Beginning at a point on the southerly Right -of -Way line of Peters Creek Road at the Northwesterly corner of Mapsico Limited Company (Roanoke County Tax Parcel #027.13-05-03.00, Instrument #201300585); thence leaving said Right -of -Way and continuing with said Mapsico line S26°02'00"E, 588.57 feet total to a point at the Northwesterly corner of NIF Harold F. Trent, Jr. & Cheryl Trent Tickle (Roanoke County Tax Parcel #027.13-05-05.00, Deed Book 1636, Page 1077) and being the Northeasterly beginning of the Right -of -Way line for Burlington Drive; thence along the Northerly Right -of -Way line of Burlington Drive S57'10'00" VV, 155.96 feet to a point at the Southeasterly corner of N/F DKE Holdings, LLC (Roanoke County Tax Parcel #27.13-04-05.00, Instrument #200417853); thence leaving said Right -of -Way line and continuing with said DKE line N32°50'00"W, 180.00 feet to a point; thence N36°41'00"W 300.85 feet to a point on the Southerly Right -of -Way line of Peters Creek Road; thence leaving the line of DKE and continuing along said Right -of -Way the following: N36°27'20"E, 190,46 feet to a point; thence N25°03'43"E, 46.63 feet to a point; thence N33'54'1 1"E, 30.69 feet to the Point of Beginning containing 2.363 acres total and being "Portion Lot C" and "Lot M" as shown on a plat entitled "Boundary Survey for Lexington Falls, LLC" prepared by Caldwell White Associates, dated February 10, 2005, recorded in Instrument #200507902 in the clerk's office of the circuit court of the County of Roanoke, Virginia. 10111011:INN11101411 nMIMItoaLI MIM AlM&I ROANOKE • RICHMOND • NEW RIVER VALLEY • 5TAUNTON • HARRI50NBURG 1208 Corporate Circle + Roanoke, Virginia 24018 • (540) 772-9580 • FAX (540) 772-8050 vw m balzer.cc s U VINIONWMIONV02l 10 A1N1100 m m s o SNMOH o A E a9=� NOIlOf12i1SNOO 210d 10N �' ATJVNI'NIl3Lld NVId2131StlW ;. $" a B 3AIi10 N010NI'I?Jf18 0 8 OVN332I0 S2131dd 9909 n o ■ 3AM0 SS300b'- 01TS11VJ W1SNIXT o 0 0 w J e + �« w\ . •°>. ` \ilk, > > wMtx . ` » e � F71.1 \ @ / \ - ƒ / \ ƒ _ \ \ . §2 2 ) § ) - E ® ° e a )> � z§§ N^ 3 k 2 C /\\ / a / / / § § j ƒ ) / mz l U U /N C) U N N U U N U U U � U U U U U ry U y � � 'if, .11.1, \��, ■� � ' W H W D W 0 H H H U F - Z H � U U F- Z � � Z H U � H H H Z ) U o N Z LL O S oO U LL o �� N C N O 00 N N 2 o r ` LL O O .. i O Q 00 O N Z EOO N m U Zuiui N o m �� \ %O O 0) rn _ Q W N N S. Q Q X .N 0) N UM a`se;e Q H O O W d Q ln`eann 9 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. G.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: April 25, 2017 Ordinance accepting and appropriating $200,000 to the Roanoke County Public Schools from the sale of surplus computer equipment SUBMITTED BY: Rebecca Owens Director of Finance APPROVED BY: Thomas C. Gates County Administrator ISSUE: Appropriate $200,000 to the Roanoke County Public Schools from the sale of retired computer equipment BACKGROUND: Roanoke County Public Schools has had a laptop program for grades 9-12 for the past fourteen years. The program has a replacement schedule whereby each year Roanoke County Public Schools funds the replacement of one grade level of laptops that have exceeded their useful life. DISCUSSION: During the school year 2016-2017, Roanoke County Public Schools (RCPS) identified approximately 1,600 MacBook Air laptops and 1,000 Dell latitude laptops and OptiPlex desktops that are beyond their useful life. To ensure the proper data removal and allow for environmentally friendly destruction of all equipment, Powerhouse Recycling performed these services and paid RCPS for the surplus of the equipment. FISCAL IMPACT: Roanoke County Public Schools received $200,000 from the sale of surplus computer Page 1 of 2 equipment. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the first reading of this ordinance and scheduling the second reading on May 9, 2017. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 25, 2017 ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $200,000 TO ROANOKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FROM THE SALE OF SURPLUS COMPUTER EQUIPMENT WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Public Schools has a laptop program for grades 9-12; and WHEREAS, during the school year 2016-2017, Roanoke County Public Schools identified 1,600 MacBook Air laptops and 1,000 Dell latitude laptops that are beyond their useful life; and WHEREAS, to ensure proper data removal and destruction of all equipment, the state vendor, Powerhouse Recycling, will perform these services and pay RCPS for the surplus equipment; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter provides that funds be appropriated by ordinance; and WHEREAS, first reading of this ordinance was held on April 25, 2017, and the second reading was held on May 9, 2017. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows.. 1. That the sum of $200,000 is hereby appropriated to the Roanoke County Public Schools; and 2. That this ordinance shall take effect from and after the date of adoption. Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. H.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: All open appointments BACKGROUND: April 25, 2017 Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards Deborah Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Thomas C. Gates County Administrator 1. Budget and Fiscal Affairs Committee (BFAC) (appointed by District and At - Large) The following District appointments remain open: Hollins Magisterial District Cave Spring Magisterial District At -Large (2) openings 2. Economic Development Authority (EDA) (appointed by District) Dan Toti, representing the Catawba Magisterial District has resigned. His four-year unexpired term ends September 18, 2018. The following four-year term expired on September 26, 2015: a) Greg Apostolou, representing the Hollins Magisterial District is eligible for reappointment Page 1 of 2 3. Library Board (appointed by District) The following four-year term expired on December 31, 2016 a) Heather Lawrence, representing the Vinton Magisterial District FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: There is no staff recommendation associated with this agenda item. Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 25, 2017 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I- CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for April 25, 2017, designated as Item I - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 4 inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of minutes — February 28, 2017 2. Request to accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $6,964.40 from the Virginia Office of Emergency Medical Services for the purchase of a Physio Lucas 2 Mechanical CPR Device for use on cardiac arrest patients 3. Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to Kyle E. Schirmer, Police Officer -Sergeant, upon his retirement after more than twenty years of service 4. Confirmation of appointment to the Roanoke Valley Greenway (At -Large); Local Office on Aging (LOA) (At -Large) Page 1 of 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 1.2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: April 25, 2017 Request to accept and allocate grant funds in the amount of $13,928.80 from the Office of Emergency Medical Services for the Emergency Medical Services Grant SUBMITTED BY: Stephen Simon Chief of Fire and Rescue APPROVED BY: Thomas C. Gates County Administrator ISSUE: Acceptance and allocation of $13,928.80 for the Emergency Medical Services Grant from the Office of Emergency Medical Services. BACKGROUND: The Office of Emergency Medical Services (OEMS) is responsible for planning and coordinating an effective and efficient statewide emergency management system (EMS). OEMS receives funding allocated from the Four -for Life program annually. This funding is legislated by the Code of Virginia 46.2-694 and provides various grant programs to be used only for EMS purposes. DISCUSSION: Fire and Rescue received a grant from this program for the purchase of one Physio Lucas 2 Mechanical CPR Device for use on cardiac arrest patients. The purchase of this new equipment will not only provide consistent, constant CPR during patient transport but will also reduce the risk to responders by allowing them to remain seated and restrained during the transport. Page 1 of 2 FISCAL IMPACT: Awarded grant funds total $13,928.80, which includes a required local match of 50% or $6,964.40. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the acceptance and allocation of grant funds to the Fire and Rescue Department in the amount of $13,928.80 from the Office of Emergency Medical Services. Page 2 of 2 N arissa J. Leine, %1D NIPH, FAAFP State Health Commissioner Gan -R. Brown Director P_ Scott Wlmton Assistant Director Don Altice Roanoke County Fire & Rescue 5925 Cove Road Roanoke, VA 24019 Dear Grant Administrator: COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Dept tinent of Health Oft3ce of Emergency Medical Serv=ices 1041 Teclwolo s- Piwk DAve Glen ANe% V.1 2304,9-4500 January 01, 2017 1-800-523-8019 (VA only) 804-888-9100 (_Bain Office) 804-888-9120 (Training Office) FAX: 804-371-3108 The Office of Emergency Medical Services (GEMS) is pleased to announce that your agency has been awarded funding from the Financial Assistance for Emergency Medical Services Grant Program, known as the Rescue Squad Assistance Fund (RSAF). The attached Award Page itemizes the actual dollar value, quantity, funding level and item(s) your agency has been awarded under this program. The following documents can be completed and submitted via E -Gift: Memorandum of Agreement: Must be submitted by February 28, 2017. Instructions for Grant Reimbursement: All items must be submitted in order to process your reimbursement. Equipment StatuslFinal Report Form: This form must be submitted sixty (60) days after the grant cycle deadline. If your agency has had special conditions placed on your grant award, any and all conditions must be met in order to receive reimbursement. Items awarded may be available by state contract, www.eva.virginia.gov, OEMS recommends your agency purchase under state contract if applicable. Any funding your agency receives through Return to Localities funding cannot be used as the matching share of Rescue Squad Assistance Fund grants or any grants offered using Four -For -Life funds. "Ary funds received from Section 16.2- 694 by a non -state agency cannot be used to match any other funds derived from Section 46.2-691 by that same non - state agency". All items awarded funding must be ordered from the vendor by February 28, 2017 invoices for all items awarded funding must be submitted to OEMS by July 31, 2017. You must contact GEMS prior to the February 28, 2017 deadline if your agency has encountered difficulties in meeting these deadlines. If you have any questions, please contact Amanda Davis. OEMS Grant Program Manager at (804) 888-9106, Amanda. Davis@vdh.virginia.gov or Linwood P. Pulling, Grant Specialist at (804) 888-9105, Linwood.Pulling@vdh.virginia.gov or 1-800-523-6019 for additional grant information. Congratulations, 4 �> Gary R. Brown, Director Vr�HAIERGJNJA HEAcI MNi n.,r�w� kv w�I tat. dnswwwwr uw�.ti�dh.vlrginia.guv; �Knts Office of Emergency Medical Services Consolidated Grant Program AWARD PAGE January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2017 Grant Period Agency Name: Roanoke County Fire & Rescue Grant Number: WV -003112-16 Item Type (Item) Physio Lucas 2 y Funding Status Funded % Level Amount Funded FUNDED 1 50/50 56 96440 Conditions: 13 -Acknowledgment must be provided on any printed material, equipment or vehicle as follows: "Funding was made possible by a grant from the Virginia Office of Emergency Medical Services, Virginia Department of Health." 21 -SPECIAL CONDITION (Must submit a grant modification request if planning to purchase a Lucas 3 in place of the original award.) 36 -Agencies using ePCR systems with the capability to submit in real-time, all ImageTrend, ZOLL, and emsCharts users, for version 2, must enable Auto-Post/Sync/ submit in real-time to VPHIB. Once an EMS agency has migrated to the version 3 EMS data standard (VAv3) all agencies using an ePCR systems w0l submit in real-time unless approved in writing by the GEMS. EMS data quality will not be assessed for 30 days after an EMS incident to allow resubmission of incomplete ePCRs. 37 -Agencies using ImageTrend, ZOLL, or emsCharts EMS ePCR software products must submit EMS data to VPHIB using a Web -services connection for Virginia's version 2 EMS data standard submissions. Once the agency has migrated to the Virginia version 3 data standard (VAv3) all submissions to VPHIB must be submitted via Web -services. ALS Training FUNDED 1 50/50 Conditions: 6 -Must satisfy all ALS course requirements, and are subject to audit by GEMS. 12 -Itemized quote must be submitted to GEMS for approval prior to purchase. 13 -Acknowledgment must be provided on any printed material, equipment or vehicle as follows: "Funding was made possible by a grant from the Virginia Office of Emergency Medical Services, Virginia Department of Health." 23 -Must submit course curriculum/agenda to GEMS for reviewlapproval within 30 days of grant award Must report to GEMS relevant statistics to demonstrate successful completion of training program prior to grant reimbursement. Minimal reporting statistics should include: 1) number of registered students; 2) number of students completing the training; 3) number of pass/fail, if applicable: 4) summary of student evaluations, instructor(s) evaluations and any identified gaps in curriculum. 36 -Agencies using ePCR systems with the capability to submit in real-time, all ImageTrend, ZOLL, and emsCharts users, for version 2, must enable Auto-Post/Sync/ submit in real-time to VPHIB. Once an EMS agency has migrated to the version 3 EMS data standard (VAv3) all agencies using an ePCR systems will submit in real-time unless approved in writing by the GEMS. EMS data quality will not be assessed for 30 days after an EMS incident to allow resubmission of incomplete ePCRs. 37 -Agencies using ImageTrend, ZOLL, or emsCharts EMS ePCR software products must submit EMS data to VPHIB using a Web -services connection for Virginia's version 2 EMS data standard submissions. Once the agency has migrated to the Virginia version 3 data standard (VAv3) all submissions to VPHIB must be submitted via_ Web -services. Total: $12,941.50 $19,905,90 Office of Emergency Medical Services Virginia Department of Health GEMS Grant Program Memorandum of Agreement i Please keep a copy of this document for your records. As a grantee under the terms of the Office of the Emergency Medical Services (GEMS), Financial Assistance for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Grant Program, Known as the Rescue Squad Assistance Fund (RSAF), the undersigned hereby agrees to abide and comply by the following requirements, per Virginia Emergency Medical Services Regulations 12VAC5-31 Part VIII Financial Assistance for Emergency Medical Services: 1. Responsibilities of the Grantee: • Grantee shall not discriminate in the provisions of its services or in the conduct of its business affairs on the basis of race, religion, color, sex, national origin, age, disability, or any other basis prohibited by law. By accepting this grant, the grantee certifies to the Commonwealth that they will conform to the provisions of the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, as well as the Virginia Fair Employment Contracting Act of 1975, as amended, where applicable, the Virginians with Disabilities Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act. • Grantee must comply with Part VIII Financial Assistance for Emergency Medical Services regulations. The grantee shall be responsible for ensuring that item(s) purchased in whole or in part with the use of state moneys comply with these regulations. • Grantee shall be responsible for the preparation and maintenance of proper accounting records that shall be maintained for a period six (6) years from the end of the grant period. These records shall be subject to and available for inspection by this agency, its authorized agents, and/or state auditors shall have full access to and the right to examine any of said materials during said period. • Grantee shall continue to provide services to the citizens and community served within the Commonwealth that meet the goals and objectives of the Code of Virginia §32.1-111.3 in developing a comprehensive, coordinated, statewide emergency medical care system. • Grantee shall meet the requirements pursuant to the Code of Virginia §32.1-111.12, "No moneys shall be disbursed directly to any rescue squad or other emergency medical services organization unless such squad or organization operates on a nonprofit basis exclusively for the benefit of the general public." 2. Use of Funds: • Funds must be used only for the specific items, service, or programs for which they were awarded, including any conditions placed upon a grant award, Should any audit reveal that funds were disbursed for item(s) not awarded funding, the grantee shall be held responsible for repayment, subject to possible enforcement actions under the Virginia Administrative Code or criminal prosecution. • By sianing this "Memorandum of Agreement" form the grantee attests that the award funds will be used as granted and meets all conditions placed upon the award. 1041 Technology Park Drive, Glen Allen, VA 23059 page 1 (804) 888-9100 (800) 523-6019 VA Only FAX (804) 371-3108 Revised 12114 Office of Emergency Medical Services Virginia Department of Health • Sale, trade, transfer, or disposal, within five (5) years of vehicles or items specified by GEMS in the notice of award purchased in whole or in part with the use of state monies requires prior approval by OEMS. The date of the invoice submitted by the grantee determines the start date of the five year period. • Funds must not be used for expenditures or commitments made before the date of the grant award or after the conclusion of the grant period. All items awarded funding must be ordered from the vendor within 60 days of the grant award; invoices for all items awarded funding must be submitted to OEMS within 5 months (150 days) of the grant award date. You must contact OEMS if your agency has encountered difficulties in meeting these deadlines. Grant periods conclude on either June 30 or December 31. • Funds returned to localities under the Code of Virginia §46.2-694 and provided to the grantee cannot be used as the matching share of any grants pursuant to §46.2-694. • Funds will not be approved or disbursed for: o Leased equipment or vehicles a Equipment or vehicles secured by a lien, o Guarantees or warranties, o Used equipment or vehicles without prior approval, or o Fire suppression apparatus or law-enforcement equipment. 3. Ownership: • The title for all equipment, including EMS vehicles, shall be in the name of the organization to which the award has been made or in the name of the local jurisdiction or government entity in which the organization is located. This requirement shall apply to the ownership of equipment purchased in whole or in part with the use of these funds. 4. Improper Expenditures: • An audit revealing expenditures not permitted by the conditions of the award will result in the grantee being required to reimburse GEMS on any funds received. • A grantee providing false, misleading or improper information to OEMS will be ineligible for future grants for a period of five (5) years and may be subject to additional investigation and enforcement by OEMS and/or criminal prosecution. 5. Modification of an Award: • Any changes of the award shall be permitted only by modification of the award, prior to the purchase of the award. c The grantee must request in writing the specific modifications desired and the reasons and circumstances necessitating such a request to OEMS and granted prior to the purchasing of the equipment and/or the commencing of the courses/classes stated in the request. OEMS may modify, approve or deny the request for modification. 1041 Technology Park Drive, Glen Allen, VA 23059 (804) 888-9100 (800) 523-6019 VA Only FAX (804) 371-3108 Page 2 Revised 12114 Office of Emergency Medical Services Virginia Department of Health 6. Award Requirements: • Grants awarded under RSAF are required to submit an Equipment Status/Final Report Form to OEMS no later than sixty (60) days after the end of the grant period. • Grant awards for any vehicle or equipment must display the OEMS decal noting that funding was provided by OEMS. C, The decal for the vehicle is to be displayed on the rear window on the inside of the vehicle easily seen by the public. All agencies must be compliant with OEMS approved submission for EMS data including the minimum dataset and in the prescribed technical format as required by Virginia Code §32.1-116.1. • Any materials produced in whole or in part with state funds, shall contain the following statement: "Funding for this project provided by the Virginia Department of Health, Office of Emergency Medical Services." • OEMS reserves the right to reproduce any funded projects for state-wide use. All copyright and patent rights to all papers, reports, forms, materials, creations, or inventions developed in the performance of awarded state funds shall become the sole property of the Commonwealth. On request, the grantee shall promptly provide an acknowledgment or assignment in a tangible form satisfactory to the Commonwealth to evidence the Commonwealth's sole ownership of specifically identified intellectual property created or developed in the performance of the awarded state funds. Grantee must provide GEMS with a copy of the completed project as requested, such as print materials or video. • Agencies using electronic patient care reporting systems (ePCR) with the capability to submit in real- time, including but not limited to, all ImageTrend, ZOLL, and emsCharts users, for version 2, must enable Auto-Post/Syncl submit in real-time to VPHIB. Once an EMS agency has migrated to the version 3 EMS data standard (VAv3) all agencies using an ePCR systems will submit in real-time unless approved in writing by the OEMS. EMS data quality will not be assessed for 30 days after an EMS incident to allow resubmission of incomplete ePCRs. Agencies using ImageTrend, Zoll, or emsCharts EMS ePCR software products must submit EMS data to • VPHIB using a Web -services connection for Virginia's version 2 EMS data standard submissions. Once the agency has migrated to the Virginia version 3 data standard (VAv3) all submissions to VPHIB must be submitted via Web -services. 1041 Technology Park Drive, Glen Allen, VA 23059 Page 3 (804) 888-9100 (800) 523-6019 VA Only FAX (804) 371-3108 Revised 12114 Office of Emergency Medical Services Virginia Department of Health MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT I. as the Authorized Agent, affirm that the grantee agrees to abide by all items listed in the Memorandum of Agreement, and by signing below attests to this fact. Any fraudulent submissions for payment (or misrepresentations of any kind) may be considered sufficient cause for grant revocation, repayment and possible prosecution of both the Grantee and the Authorized Agent, whose name appears below. Furthermore, I acknowledge that specific grant conditions may have been placed upon this grant award and that these conditions must be met in order to receive the grant funds. Name of Grantee (Agency) ROANOKE COUNTY FIRE & RESCUE Name and Title of Authorized Agent Don Aitice Daytime Phone Number (540)777-8726 Email Address (Required) DALTICE@ROANCKECOUNTYVA.GOV Signature of Authorized Agent Don Altice Federal Identification Number (FIN)I 54-6001572 Grant Number VVV-CO3112-16 Date 01/03/2017 Bottom Portion for IOEMS USE ONLY Virginia Department of Health Office of Emergency Medical Services Name and Title of Authorized Officer Gary R. Brown, Director Signature of Authorized Officerd� Date 01/03/2017 1041 Technology Park Drive, Glen Allen, VA 23059 Page 4 (804) 888-9100 (800) 523-6019 VA Only FAX (804) 371-3108 Revised 12114 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 1.3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: April 25, 2017 Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to Kyle E. Schirmer, Police Officer -Sergeant, upon his retirement after more than twenty years of service Deborah Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Thomas C. Gates County Administrator Recognition of retirement of Kyle E. Schirmer BACKGROUND: Kyle E. Schirmer, Police Officer -Sergeant, retired on April 1, 2017, after twenty years and one month of service with Roanoke County's Police Department. Sergeant Schirmer is unable to attend today's meeting and his quilt and resolution will be mailed to his home. DISCUSSION: There is no discussion associated with this agenda item. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution. Page 1 of 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 25, 2017 RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO KYLE E. SCHIRMER, POLICE OFFICER -SERGEANT, UPON HIS RETIREMENTAFTER MORE THAN TWENTY (20) YEARS OF SERVICE WHEREAS, Sergeant Schirmer was employed by Roanoke County on March 10, 1997; and WHEREAS, Sergeant Schirmer retired on April 1, 2017, after twenty years and one month of devoted, faithful and expert service to Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, during Sergeant Schirmer's tenure with Roanoke County, he served as a Police Officer in the Uniform Division, K9 Handler, Police Officer II and Police Officer - Sergeant and served with professionalism and dedication in providing services to the citizens of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, during Sergeant Schirmer's time with the Roanoke County Police Department, he was assigned as the administrator of the Mobile Data Terminals used in each patrol vehicle. Sergeant Schirmer later became the administrator of the in -car video cameras and was instrumental in selecting the cameras currently used in each car. He developed the first curriculum for report writing at the Roanoke County Criminal Justice Academy and served on several Roanoke County committees. Sergeant Schirmer introduced the Virginia Law Enforcement Assistance Program to the Police Department that provides stress management to officers after critical incidents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to KYLE E. SCHIRMER for more than twenty years of capable, loyal and dedicated Page 1 of 2 service to Roanoke County; and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy and productive retirement. Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 1-4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 25, 2017 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of appointment to the Roanoke Valley Greenway (At Large); Local Office on Aging (LOA) (At Large) SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: Deborah Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Thomas C. Gates County Administrator Confirmation of appointments. BACKGROUND: Roanoke Valley Greenway (At Large) Donald Witt's appointment to the Roanoke Valley Greenway expired April 8, 2017. Local Office on Aging (LOA)(At Large) Citizen representative Gloria Clark's appointment expired on March 31, 2017. DISCUSSION: Roanoke Valley Greenway (At Large) Staff recommends reappointment of Mr. Witt to an additional three-year term to expire April 8, 2020. Page 1 of 2 Local Office on Aging (LOA)(At Large) Ron Boyd, CEO of the LOA has requested the reappointment of Gloria Clark as a citizen at large representative to the LOA Advisory Council for a one-year term. Additionally, Mr. Boyd has requested that Mac Barnes be appointment as a citizen at large representative to the LOA Advisory Council for a one-year term. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the above appointments. Page 2 of 2 him LOCAL OFFICE ON AGING PO Box 14205 706 Campbell Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24038-4205 (540) 345-0451 Fax (540) 981-1487 www.loaa.org The Area Agency of Aging Serving Virginia's 561 Planning District Meals on Wheels Diners Clubs Care Coordination Transportation Health Promotion Ombudsman Homemaker Personal Care Health Insurance Counseling Senior Companion Program Senior Safety Cooling Assistance Legal Assistance Caregiver Assistance Information and Referral Volunteer Opportunities LOA News Speaker's Bureau EMM C..11 [•eo F.w.w. ELM United Way }jy of Roanoke Valley Ya; March 30, 2017 Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk County of Roanoke Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 2.9800 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Ms. Jacks: We are requesting that the Board of Supervisors reappoint Gloria Clark as a citizen at large representative to the LOA Advisory Council for the upcoming year. We thank you for considering her reappointment. Regards, Ron Boyd CEO LOA Local Office on Aging "Helping Older Persons Remain Independent for as Long as Possible" Cities of Roanoke, Salem & Covington • Counties of Roanoke, Alleghany, Botetourt & Craig EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / EMPLOYER IBM LOCAL OFFICE ON AGING PO Box 14205 706 Campbell Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24038-4205 (540) 345-0451 Fax (540) 981-1487 www.loaa.org The Area Agency of Aging Serving Virginia's 5t' Planning District Meals on Wheels Diners Clubs Care Coordination Transportation Health Promotion Ombudsman Homemaker Personal Care Health Insurance Counseling Senior Companion Program Senior Safety Cooling Assistance Legal Assistance Caregiver Assistance Information and Referral Volunteer Opportunities LOA News Speaker's Bureau OEM united Way y of Roanoke Valley Pn,I—Ag—y �f March 30, 2017 Deborah C. Jacks Chief Deputy Clerk County of Roanoke Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Ms. Jacks: We are requesting that the Board of Supervisors appoint Mac Barnes, a citizen of Roanoke County, as a citizen at large representative to the LOA Advisory Council for the upcoming year. We thank you for considering his appointment. Regards, ,/2� GC"4� Ron Boyd CEO LOA Local Office on Aging "Helping Older Persons Remain Independent for as Long as Possible" Cities of Roanoke, Salem & Covington • Counties of Roanoke, Alleghany, Botetourt & Craig EQUAL OPPORTUNITY j EMPLOYER } � � � . v � � � § t � 0 Q 2 0 m u 3 m � £ 3 CL 0 CL CL � � § * a 7 en 77 \ R E S a m N . k \ C � 7 '0/ o S $ 7 q a. / m o $ m (14 en 7 7 u 2 / Ln cf § u a # a % .' % a k k w _ _ � \ RZI, § m ; / a ¥ w \ R / \ $ C2 CL@ Q Q _ k A % 0 _ 5 \ } \ U \ f Ln \ \ 0-§ \ o 2 \ E 5 § % .E _ / 0 — $ 2 0 \ < \ k ) ) _ % � \ 2 # , $ \ \ G — ( % / / j 7 § § - / / Ln § § \ % @ ) 2 2 k g # # « 2 j , ' o C: \ o o # aj g, 2 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CHANGES IN OUTSTANDING DEBT Changes in outstanding debt for the fiscal year to date were as follows: Outstanding June 30, 2016 Additions Deletions General Obligation Bonds $ 4,497,704 $ - $ - VPSA School Bonds 95,149,806 8,159,100 Lease Revenue Bonds 81,150,705 - 2,740,000 Submitted By Approved By $ 180,798,215 $ Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Thomas C. Gates County Administrator Outstanding April 25, 2017 $ 4,497,704 86,990,706 78,410,705 $ 10,899,100 - $ 169,899,115 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: April 25, 2017 /G Wir'.S►TAFIMiW411VA Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Thomas C. Gates County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors Payroll 03/10/17 Payroll 03/24/17 Manual Checks Grand Total Direct Deposit 1,333,549.27 1,239,101.89 Checks 47,968.13 42,036.13 1,362.35 Total $ 11,589,977.73 1,381,517.40 1,281,138.02 1,362.35 $ 14,253,995.50 A detailed listing of the payments to vendors is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. V CCS l5� I e C� ski C4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO O V "t I— e r- O O V 0 0 0 CO O e 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N CO CO � O e 0 V V 0 CO M O O I� LO CM O I— O co N co CO M r M N CO r- O co OOOMr- 7NOCo ON BONN �O V 0r -MO V CO N r ® r M M LO N M M O CO ^ r -LO LO N0 CO ^ � N CO ^ O N O O 0 N N CO N M V M 0 ^ �O N r- 0 r- N O O� 0 _� N V V r- N � I L O O N O) M O r M � O L M O COO r4 O0) r -O M M � N 9® M00 V 0 N N V ® 04 U M O w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ 0 \ 0 0 \ e N 0 M N 0 (D N O 0) O I- O M O O r o O O co L o l- 0 N CO CO V 0 0 � CO r- co 0 0 M N V O V CO � 0 V CO �O COr- 0 V N 0 7 r 0 O V O O r- N LO I-- co V r LO cM 0 V 0 CO co V O V �O M C4 COCflo) N (.0 r- Cfl Cfl co co OM r OMO ® 0 r r M �O r co co V V r- M O N V 0 CO V CO CO CO CO V r- CO r- O r- O I� O 0 0 V O co O O co N C) 0 V �O M O M V M r- O N M C� CO M CO I� M O O V CO �O O M �O N I� O O 7 7 r r- N O I�Or-r-I� NO LOO NORM V O I—NOCor- 0 N O O O 0 0 Cl) 0 co Co O O co Co =n Cl) r- 0 0 0 Ln CO MLOO V O V OLOM V O V I—O 0) (N r- Iq N r- M LO 0) N Qo N Qo N c fl i14 N 00 O 00000000000 O �O LO O 00 O O N 00 O M O O 00 O O 00 O 0 O ® O r r- O V r- O r -_CO O CO O O O 00 O M COO �O I— O 00 N O N N O V 1 CON MI�OO Lf-) V N V r SON r-�O O LO O CO 0 �O V �O �O 0 V 0 CO 0 �% Cl) r- N N r- LO V 000)x- M I�NO V V NM LO� cM 0) V V N N M Cl) O Cl) CO N VT M r M A e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0(NL mm�m0��(DLo�( (Dc���m V N ON'O CM CM cM 00 CO rO 0 CO COOK O0M N MOO V 0 M 0 V 0 0 0 N I� 0 CO N N Vr- 0 CO V � 0 O t LO M I� LO cM 0 � N m LO O r- M M LO 0 0 � LO LO OM 0 MCO COO N I --r Cfl Cfl C4 r -r M �M0 LO CW)N LO I— co co N V N LO CO N O O I� �O V O r 0 M I� O O N N V O �O M M co CO 0 LO N N 0 CO S 0 ® 0 0 CO V V 0 O F� 0Mr-r V to OHO O �O M V LOO MLO MOOrNr m M N M CO CO O r- co 0 r- LO CO 0 M O r- I— 0 CO Lo r- O V O V O N M r- 0 0 0 M O V O O M N � r- M O LO LO O LO 0 V 0 M CO co M r- M V M N LOO 00 O O O 00 O O O O O_ O O O �O �O O N O O 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O I� r O 0 O 0 CO O O O O O O r- O O 00 CO O O - 0 0 M O M N LO LO LO Co 0 0 0 LO O LO 0 0 LO O O co r- V LO O N LO Cl) CO OO�O V CO I�ONO�ON �O V 0 O Mr-I—NN LO O1�OO r- M 0r -OM V ll � O V nLO r- r- N (D M O M CO (N r- r- V 0) LO lb T M N M N X H C� y � v � LL dS X " m m o f °� v X X „ o E m o m CL H m o o LL c m rn LL XJ u�a' " J a LL t � o o L J u F N N N N "- N _ �. a v v v LL LLj t _Y v o u m E"" o m i v m m D E" s° v N N 3 N N oo 3" o q- o q i L g aaaaa CEJ CiM LL i�Z)=Fo ¢JaLL (�a LL V � O _ N � M def Q ® cr D � L m LL 3 ® m w D L � ® m w � v r o 0 E � N � L (J) z � N v 0 SCSI w EE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a O O a OOO a rrO e N rNr LOON e O Go O N N NMO Or r (D r r cM r CO O M0 NN c -)LOO ONM OONmNO V O c6CO I� � � N M O) V O co Lo LO CM^O^OM O (y M O O) O N N "'o, r CO N O) c') ^ co N LO (V r O r MN O Lo Lq to Cfl<M 4 0) c) N c9 OV V O r --LO r� L M O) v-;I- co rLo N V A N o� \ -' o o* o 0 0 \ o 0 0* � o o \ o 9 M r C Cl) Il- O 9 N Cl) O ® V V �O LO 0 0 0 e O IS M r (n O O 0 MM V MO r- C) N V MI—I—OO O V CO N V M CO O Co CO I— r rco Cl) CO V VV O t.O It M M2 r O 0 LO O N0 A V O � O r r coM q,;,: CO O) LO r- Co �O N r CO M _- Il -M O)I-IO) COMA rNr 0') LO O (0 (0 M O N S N N N Wcl) r- O N M O V V N N r N 1® r M N r CM N r 00 LO V O V CO O 01-- X0 0 0 0 0 Il- ® 00 0 N V co M co ® O N V CO O LO 0 O N N V M n LQ r co O r N O) O I- Lo O _- N M M M M O) co O Lf-) M ® � O r I® co ® � O V e rte K 9 I® T � N M O r O O 0) r - N V r r V cM r V L Lo N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a r N e M r 0 a \ r M e V CO �O V 0 0 CO a O I-- N r O M V I O �O M O O O �O O 0 0 CM N O O) N M N V �O V N 0 0 O O� COM MCON CO CO rO r Go V O C:) 't 0 0 r-- r Ico N N co O) N O O O N N (3)N N C) O) O M0 O N V N O CO - O V �CsT COr Go " LO O) O)r CO rO L co M V M O N � 0 O I— M N O O r Or r r LO N 1® N N r M �O I� N CO N M N O r V V N 04 fh N N r M N r cM O O O O O CO M O co V 0 0 0 0 M ® O O ® M N 0 <'M M O I-- LO CO O CO ® O v O N N co r 0) N �O W O O Co O) O LO CCV N Or Com LO MO Mr NO �O �O CO N r O I� I® �O O W 0 �O N O �O r N v W K9 r r O n �O r Lf-)® N 0 r- O) N (a9 r Efl ® M V MrM �O r " N m U - 0 � E d aQ T d ® N N ss�vv Cdr L o (L ® m y m N v m m D w o N m N D- LLLL (n 9C D o° ® (n 0 D m 3 U u m o U o° o u w Q o ° a(n Y(nQ m L a(� o o c� ry D L d m w dS m dS a L LL ® > > ® N N 3 ® U C N S S ® S C)C)w a — zV) 0LLJ o a ' 0 a a v �a co ® 0 ® O LO 0 > N O � CD r � a V A 3 > 0 O O ® 0 r, I® M r a o O a e � `M ® 0 04 e 0 O 0 M N � 0 � � 0 M h O 0 M Q r r, I® I® N m cc � r Z m L6 N C6 N �U v LL D LL:3 3 m a o e O�L.L �® ® O 8 4V � N n 0 EE 0a p® V a � N y C ® O 0 8Z M v 0 N 0 U> ® C r v N w ®b LL co ® 0O 0 (' cq C� 0 � N N LO N M N 2 U) UP SE co 99 m 2 cc ® 7 N 11 o 0 0 \ o o \ ® 0 0 0 0 \ 0 0 0 0 0 0 vo ® 0 0 0 0 0 0 vo �M CD (0 70) M MM MCO r 0 1 r N O 0 o (',j 00)Ln 0) N g W 06) LO 0M N r Cl) 0) r 0)(O-0) O co 0 L 6)O0)r N ® moo o0 ® 0(O Ov6) ® Lom 000 0(O 00 Lor- o6 eA 00 O Cc N o M (Ij r u) 6) v Ln r W O W m •--• •--• •--• O O O 6) r f9 O 0 •--• O •--• •--• 0 W O N v v v C co 6) (q CO N ® M r N M (Do co O in CO W v N O W (O (N M 7N (O Cr) LO ti Ln r Ln 7 N M O O r N (Ny' O v f0 7 Lf) v 0 c ( 0 o o 0 0 C 0 0 ( C C L 0 0 oo 0 0 o 0 0 o a err 06)(V Ln Lo Lo tiMCOO M M 0MM Ln 00 r, 06)Ln 000 0) N 6) CO � N r 0 ® r r r O Go r Ln CO 7 (Ij O r, O 7 O M 6) Lf) e4(O N CO L6 MN 0) (y CO Lo -T N OO c ON r O Ln(O L� � O O � r r r O I- Ln CO r O CO (§ O O r � � w co c LLJ Ln N (N 0) M (\j L0 (O r W 0) 0) 7 r r r O f0 O 7 (N O 0) O (0 N O O M 6) CO r () n M N 7 N ® O CO M O N 0 N O N M 0) 0) (y N M 0) O N M O O O 0) R� w Cl) r 04 ni Co n r N 6i N r o Co co Ln CT)io E0 0 (Or, N r ® W r co V N M M CO M P 6) CO M @9 N M N Ln n 0) r r O O r V 6) O Ln Lo M N M 7 r M M 7 N ((j (® 04 0) r- EE 10 z N z3 M� zwL w1L 9c ca LC `mr r00 0) 0M 0) InN WN (O rLnv-6)O h OW LnO(OO 0) 9 O O (%j N W r LL) O N r M F? (\j N O M ti M v Ln M (O O Ln A O Fv N �6)N 6) r 6)(® M WLn N � Lo � M N (O N Ln 0r 6) 00 (O O M 7 N co ^ MO 00 O (O 0 ep oo N (O 7 Iq O M (y N N CO N Ln Ln N r r O N r � Cl) M M M ® 7 (O 6) (O Ln 6) 7 M 6) N Ln O N N N r Q (V Cl)V r ( 7 7 N c6 O MU u g M ti= mo Z W o 0 0 0 0 0 a e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 �OONO N W vN OO) m O0)v Ln Lo oo OO WOvr M ® LO 6) P O O CO 6)m N CO r N Cl) O � O O N O (fl 7 (§ D Q C m R4 C� O N r r 0 (y co 0 r ri 7 co (o r-- r r 0 0 N c0rv co 0 0 0 W r co CV OLn-0 coo 0) r 6) 0 ] C jw ^ (p R oo o LE LL D W N C zZ G�;y��y L t o FAL y u ®m(D 0 OCr) Ln 00 R vv NN (NO6) rO 0) O(O r OOO Ory N r- Lr) M 'o (D ® 6)0Ln WM N r- Cl) OO N N Ln 0) N N LSD Ln M (O r V M 0) O N r CO h Cii - 16 Ln CO v N v Lo Ln CO V c v CD ri L6 LPjCO Lo LOi (Ii N ® Gly Ln (O N N N Fry 7 N N 7 r O M Ln In r O N M M M (.y Ln (O W 7 N Z ^ L49 6) CO n Q CO r 7 O) O Ln M (d T r Cl) M N V M N V Cl) Ln o6 u EE N W 0.1L ca c� rCl) 6)0) Ov M v(O(OO c® (D In 0Ln0 Ln OW r0 V O 0) m 7 (O 7 M M LO Go Cl) 7 r R co v 0 0 M O O M Go6) ® N 7 (O Ln 7 (O CO r O oo M O N r O O N Ln CO 6 N go N r-- 0) z Ln 0) N (O r [® LnLnN O7 0) CO7 Lo� ® r N0 6) V m (O 0) 'T O ® r Ln Cl)r 7 r, r O r- :-: M N M r 0) R V (® N Ln O (O m 7 N 7 Q) O) (p cli V N CO N O Cl) L-0 0 M Ca 0 ' � C 0o C EE CFE U U W Q 0 E m 'm < < W D � W C 'E U E Q u E 0 O �2 dj Q U m N v U di W 3 V) C u W J W _co % v N W U m Q p W v C W m t C W W E U U n U m dS V D p O 0 Nu 0 ® L L L W N U) 2 y N C y m 2 W U 0 � U 0 � E u C W = 0 u 3 0 a! a! C '^ N 0 J(9W (9 (�� C JLl(iQ U` �� W �(9 3 0 J 0 �av)c�acn = N o 0 0 \ 0 0 0 0 \ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ o o d° _ (V ON I N LO COO R r 0000 0 MCO ® CO N g N � (O (O I! M O ® N m (O 0000 ® ir) (\j ® f Lo 6) N c6 c0 r M (( �n ((j (-,j N (O O O O O 7 ® a- � � �� r � O cc N 4 N v^ 0 (O^M^ 0 r Lo -T 000 0 CO (N w w LO O 0 sO (D CO Op 7 � Oi 'Q 0 Or N W M z) 00i (� ® O� v 6) v c0 0) p N 0 � co M N v M r v 0vi EE 0 c N cy)0 0 0 o 0 ( 0 0 0 0 0 0 0( 0 0 5 IV (O (N r I- v N v 6) n O r Lo 0 6) 00 M O (O IT co g -M r 7E(j M 7 O) r M 6)c-) O c0 O O ei Lo co L6 w( r r 6) n r M (O 0 n 0 V CO 7 (N (O r (® (® v§ � L m MM LO v r O (07 0000 O)M (N (O e� 0 7 CO m (O 6) 7 N (N (O M Lo O LO O N M w (� (Ij 6) m co r 6) M 0) N M O O (® Lo In C n 14� CO r r N M 6) N N N LO r 0 7 LoLO E� cr A N r (D c O) (,j w f0 9c EE Lo z3 g U c w ]w EEca g cM0 14. 0r 00 (n ONO(O r M � v (O ® co yU M6)0 (N r6 O 00Lo OM COQ rCO f4 I® (O N O CO O CO 7 S O M O N co N M r (N g r �N 6)MLo Ln co �f)r cy) co6) COr r Lr)r v v MO ON N r ® 0) °n n O) O CO r- °n 6) O O z3 N M (6 r co (Ij M 'q o6 co N M O 0) zi M u 9c Lu _ 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o_ 0 0 0 m 7�r)N rnrrco I� ® 0 ® A O T ��� (O M � M O CO °[J co 0- M 0 °[J O O R 7(N �v� W g`�v rnv v00 (y 6)�0 W (000 yr (� 'v U( z r (O O) r 7 r 6) Lr) (O r 7 M (y (O r (4 0 i �< m �® ] C o gEL a L� — C wW r �0 Go o GoLooLo (Ij c00 Lo v Or OOO O6) Z C r �(O CON (§ 0CY) r (OM (OOeA (Y) (ON cl �� [ (O O O 7 N CO CO � Qy M (h 0 0 7 N M 0) CO M 7 0 M O (N C� � co � (N co M w (o v w N r v N r ir) (d CO N L6 C ® �E Lo ® z3 (L m, w EE i LU LU 3 o (O(\jO O) (V rrO (® 6)OM Or o I- 0O LO MVO I® v6)(NO (9 (OO(N Or OvLor (+) OLS (c MOv r Lo6)000v OM co 6i 61 °ri r � r V °6 O °ri 6 G6 Oi N M r- CO CO O N N N rr) M O (N M (O m O) 7 L 7 O CO M co 7 �f I ® w N M Q r N OM (v) m N m m fy) 0 EE N C 0 C m E 0 a m u ] ° ) C U v L U (1 u in C v C� oC C @ _ = U J ] v 3 C W 0 0 C C W EE ® D dS 0 T W W u C %v _ v 0 W ° ® W W D u m v � W W ?� y C N v 0 C m - O W �' W m m u i v)" U° p a s C9 T W C E p Q� T W N N 0 C C i E— C o O C KE 9 _ W w` W v 9 o u o ® E% " v o C ® W a �0 (I a0w0 0 Lu C5 0Y no z ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER. MEETING DATE: April 25, 2017 AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of 28 -Feb -17 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: CASHINVESTMENT: SUNTRUST CON 3,493,817.91 3,493,817.91 CrZsPA=1N �il�►�� SCOTT STRINGFELLOW CONTRA (127,698.00) SCOTT STRINGFELLOW 54,007,495.08 WELLS FARGO 14,000,000.00 WELLS FARGO CONTRA (79,500.00) 67,800,297.08 LOCAL GOVT INVESTMENT POOL: 2,526,252.22 GENERAL OPERATION 12,254,552.13 12,254,552.13 MONEY MARKET: BRANCH BANKING & TRUST 1,087,300.23 SCOTT STRINGFELLOW - JAIL 1,107,987.63 SCOTT STRINGFELLOW 3,249,749.75 UNION FIRST 3,084,960.93 VALLEY BANK/BNC 2,526,252.22 WELLS FARGO 2,253,375.79 13,309,626.55 TOTAL 96,858,293.67 04/25/2017 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER. MEETING DATE: April 25, 2017 AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of 31 -Mar -17 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: CASHINVESTMENT: SUNTRUST CON 485,392.02 485,392.02 CrZsPA=1N �il�►�� SCOTT STRINGFELLOW CONTRA (212,382.00) SCOTT STRINGFELLOW 54,007,297.53 WELLS FARGO 14,000,000.00 WELLS FARGO CONTRA (78,500.00) 67,716,415.53 LOCAL GOVT INVESTMENT POOL: 2,527,325.23 GENERAL OPERATION 8,262,835.93 8,262,835.93 MONEY MARKET: BRANCH BANKING & TRUST 1,088,004.22 SCOTT STRINGFELLOW - JAIL 1,108,458.35 SCOTT STRINGFELLOW 323,053.55 UNION FIRST 3,085,615.96 VALLEY BANK/BNC 2,527,325.23 WELLS FARGO 268,616.77 8,401,074.08 TOTAL 84,865,717.56 04/25/2017 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. L.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: April 25, 2017 Work session to review with the Board of Supervisors the proposed fiscal year 2018-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Christopher Bever Director of Management and Budget Thomas C. Gates County Administrator Review the proposed fiscal year 2018-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) including debt information with the Board of Supervisors. BACKGROUND: As part of the annual budget development process, County staff conducts a series of work sessions with the Board of Supervisors after the County Administrator proposes his budget. This work session is the third of three scheduled work sessions, and will provide information on the proposed fiscal year 2018-2027 CIP and County debt initially presented to the Board of Supervisors on January 24, 2017. This is the last scheduled work session before first reading to adopt the budget on May 9, 2017. DISCUSSION: This work session will provide information to the Board of Supervisors regarding the proposed fiscal year 2018-2027 CIP. The work session will provide details on both County and Roanoke County Public Schools (RCPS) proposed capital projects. Information on outstanding debt, debt service, and Board of Supervisors' approved debt ratios will also be presented. The attached Power Point presentation will be shown. Additionally, County staff will present a summary of Board of Supervisors recommended Page 1 of 2 changes to the operating budget since the County Administrator's operating budget proposal on March 14, 2017. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with the receipt of the attached presentation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors receive information regarding the fiscal year 2018-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Page 2 of 2 0 N .CL El E E L.L. 06 t/1 V _ � _0 .O_ c L.L. E E C6 -0 C6 O LL O a- 06 a- a- J (A U 4-J Q) N Q) Q)Q) O L O O L Q O V Q U _ Q ateJ Q C6 L OSS Q ca DC U cnU c N .— U C: r -.,O O tai NO �O o N O W N N E00 . N 00 rl =3 ca rl C j O O N O u O 0 r,4 a -J 4A -ox a -J LL LL m Z mei W U .� � o O N � M •— r— c O N H -00 W OU D•W 0O ^ ^0 Q— Q— N z 0 ate-+ U i a--+ N aA _O O U 9 N N N i 0 El W U 00 7 a 4 w m Ln f6 0 U Ln 7 a I / T I 0) 00 Lri Lri 3 N M U N .i LA r -I •i ri O Ln V? N Vf 2 N Vf U Ln o c O 00 M N U {1} LA c di wUr, c w U oo C N M U 111 .O LA E •'O N 7 >- LA U = Ln i? 49F Nit b.0 0 r-, N 0 N Q) I E 00 0 0 r,j 0- >- E L.L ca ca r- U N O N I 00 r- 0 O N L94 NO Q Q Q\ Q i Q O O O O O O O O O O N Ln O O Ln 0) N Q ii) - NO Q Q Q O O Q O� Lr� L� O N DO lD ul 00 O O O O O O v1� O� Q� Q� gyp` Lr) u1 "V*). " M H O O O n O Ln U N N O N C6 N ^ O ELL t M W u v U QL (n i O Q v N m p v W ° I.L N L L v E E % (> 4-J/ \T _�QL O Q � O ' bD � oC t 4A � � � cx U > ° n, O __Iz i ° U \ E Q m ° OU �U ° N ° N O ° _ ° . a)° ; X W OQ > v v N N D — +v, 0 N _ N 4-0 Q U U L7 O O O O L� 00 00 H H _ O 1 O a o 0 V m n m V O O O O O r- O 3 m qt:t Ln N N 00 R* O L.L 06 r`! N } N .°N, U � a 00 ,4) O � O� m N m 401N a � n 1 W V) � q 0 U ^O �.L • U O J U m H L 0 U O o Q:) o o L O O O H H M O CS, CS, rl� � O O O M H O to M O �1 � � � � � Op H O O O O O N ul 00 O� O� O� �� M� O� N O O 00 �o O H OOOOOOOmRT m O O O O O O O O r -I N 4—Cb OLn r- r- N rn OLn oo O iO ih r -I rn N N N oo rn N N Uin. in. in. in. in. in. in. in. N U O N N�' U a) °Q) N 00 U N ° •— a� u % O N E +� 4-jM U ; U ; O ^ `E co (') (/) i E OL a) 2 n U O p a) a1 }, U L.L o v v v � Lv o m m a aA co >-N � � � � Q c� W L O a1 UaA - ° L U (/) a1 N m a1 C: J � 0L I " m + + OL O O O d N 0 n� 0 U O l.L wQr- j = Un m I a) m OO F--0= M U E w O-0 `n L.L U > L — X LO 0 °O o o z Q) O M M H H H H 00 0 o M 0 00 (� N O 0 N Ln N' I 4) o N � •U m p N Q) ra V U N •— m -Woff`•' v U o Q ON r'1 U O O • . � ++ N i _00 N u - :3i �m� ON C N % 4-j+' C: C: N .� E O (v U nu N W O O O n 1 W f6 a-J N L E_ a--+ �— Q E V) M u > a + L O O U u E +-+ N O O OO E 0 N O EO 0 00 0 00 N C ^ O i N c/f O -0 UU^` Q VLn U C °o 4-�Zi 0, Ecw O U `) f6 N W 0 O� m • }, O O N O N O _ -0 U NN 4-Jo C: 0 00 4-J r 1 O Q = Q v _O V • — N N ate--+ 4A ' -0 .� o O `� N _0 N vv O E. f6 N 1 a"' Z3 N a LL ` T `� " C: O -0 �, f6 Q } p O OD OC N cr .U- o N 0 � N v) n d E _0co E v aA aA c6 0 L.L O E O O +�-1 Q O Q 0 •� = Li Q U a � Q) �U C i� f6 L 0 L N ++ O N 41 i E 00 41 c -I � O O N 0- >- } E L.L _ m .Q U Ln i C) C C) C) Q\ Q\ C) C) �h M Lr� 414 O O O O� H O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O w r—I O O O U N U O E O 0 �; 0 v > Q)Wl w (Y 00 � U N N _IZ- U U G.) O a°'+ N U m Q) H..� Lj QL �' E OE O ' ^ O i N w v1 U L -j f6 L O O O O 06 ,s N v O o � ra cn Q O U 41 n a LU V) �E CZ) O CZ) O O O' C) 0 0 0 0 Lri 0 0 0 0 0 Ln' o' Lr' o' o 00 ^ t'1 r -I LA U Ln � H N U CZ) O CZ) O O O' O O� O �I Oo Lri � H C O C O 00 ^ t'1 r -I LA U Ln N U N O 4-' N v > 0 O t/7 x N N U Q E v •- O U v ) v > 0 O Q E J J _0 M - U N f6 i ON i O N N n (n Q = _ O O O O O O - O O O CS, a O O 0 O 0 VO' o O' O' cn - N 00 n � • m O O O E ..00 � U =oma. - �4L; �A LL O N M N U � N 0 nl N I . Q p N 0 M O U N U H ca v U i W O � O � � r'1 U _ - U m H i O a--+ N E i 0 Ln �/ I — f6 E O � Q • _ • U E N •� \ _ Q U u W � (3) i N a-+ N O p C C: = - VJ :• � O ` 0 Q - (7 a^ ate-+ M N Q Q U U W Q LL E O NC) � rq 0 oo N ; Q i i i i i i Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q _ Q� Q\ Q� Q� Q� O OO O � N Q Q Q Q Q Q O O OO O O O 00 Q QN N N00 � t t4 t4 t4 M. H ti O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O •• O Ln O O O r -I O O O O O m O Ln O W �- 00 M N m r -I N Lll I� M t/? •Nf' U N U � L O ` O • N W o Ln C1A CO L cOL U O n , U L N � (U •' O CSI W U � E w Q 0-0 N Q) c c Q Q) �\ .cB N N +' u O u N •� 41 LL / N U �, � fB O 4A O > L (,/, • CL (10 L d 076 U U =3 c N Q E U L N cn V 00 U v L O U N L O 4- O N O U 0 O ate, M N } N O n C9 � (n Q = * ~ � 3E a o 0 0 V o o O cn o 0 Lr) 0 00 ._ — fa i GJ O r- O o O N Ui 0 N r -I M LL ^ Q N U O O N oo c N• --n 000 'i cin N i r-- (n/)1 O W N U m > •� •- O N O W � q V / O(\i N U O� � N U m H W n �n l W U N 00 N U I W i V)) OW N U W W N 0� 0 n0 } n O O O Lr L!i N N -L4 O O O a N � N� E O O C OLL O ~ N O co U +.i •E N E E O W O U N O � � Lr 4- N a. N •- Q -L O O � O O 4� Lr N d � U N � U 0 C i 4. N N b.0C co � 00 dA 4 - CO 4- N Q 4� 0 N Q O Q 0 t d a-•+ N � C i W O = 4- CO � N 4. N � C a_ � ani V c U O U O O 0 O O O O O M rl) n N -L4 -in N O CL O L- CL O O O O O O O. 0. CN N t• OO N O O O • Os Lr) L6 CN CN t4 �? W W n �n l W U N 00 N U I W i V)) OW N U W W N 0� 0 n0 } n O O O Lr L!i N N -L4 O O O a N � N� E O O C OLL O ~ N O co U +.i •E N E E O W O U N O � � Lr 4- N a. N •- Q -L O O � O O 4� Lr N d � U N � U 0 C i 4. N N b.0C co � 00 dA 4 - CO 4- N Q 4� 0 N Q O Q 0 t d a-•+ N � C i W O = 4- CO � N 4. N � C a_ � ani V c U O U O O 0 O O O O O M rl) n N -L4 -in N O CL O L- CL ,�� v^ I n U ry U cn U O n � M � O O Nq Nq Os Nq �6 Os Os cs �1 N rn O 00 O Mrn N 14 O O O O O O O O O O Ln Ln O O O M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 0 N t/? N V) O n U _ O L.L O O 1..� Uv V) � N O -0U � N D I n W O N �O �U W (/)0 0 0-O O 0O Q— ry � M � O O Nq Nq Os Nq �6 Os Os cs �1 N rn O 00 O Mrn N 14 O O O O O O O O O O Ln Ln O O O M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 0 N t/? N L cB ME Nk cB L O L U N �� L O C O U j. O O 076 -C = cn = a O O o0N� O L N u �5 G E N LU CO 0 L E L U 2 m L cB ME Nk cB L O L U N �� L O C O U j. O O 076 -C = cn = a O I. Q. lti. O O O p L6 O D t4 t4 14 LL v I O O O OO O O U a M O o� M Q� (, U . v � O O s 0 0 0 O V 0 0 0 0 0 0 ^ 0 0 0 U�N00 N � 0 o r�4 06 N N 06 C 0 0 .0 N Oct N a o D I n M_ w U r N O C `_` O 4-0N 0 HU u NL O O 0 O N OU ON c� N of L.L ry m H N O N EON O N LL .Q U U -a O NIP ul M� W � N V CO CO M r -I � O Lf N i V'J. u LAz Q O 3 c o d O N `4 > 00 0) vNi O �^ N __ a V) m J Co � N N 41 O "a V1 Y �• U41 41 VI U 00 O C N i r- i •i Oyi OC U y m 7 N i O } 1 C m O O N U N t U oC U m 0.0 > Ln N s c Y 1 J m r N C U 41 m O 7 4, O 'A t U m a OOC C �O �S U n N M� W � N V CO CO M r -I � O Lf N i V'J. u LAz Q O 3 c o d O N `4 > 00 0) vNi O �^ N __ a V) m J Co � N N 41 O "a V1 Y �• U41 41 VI U 00 O C N i r- i •i Oyi OC U y m 7 N i O } 1 C m O O N U N t U oC U m 0.0 > vi s c U 0 J m N co 7 1 Lli Lr) O O 0 M N lfl F O O 7 1 � �0 o 3 � O Q0 E N w O N 7 1 � �0 o O 0 � m o Ln Ln E-::i- t.6 N U i 3 N v �O tw O .S m ii U ' O O O ' ' O O O O O O O O O Lii O O O O O O I- ko O 0''' �t O� � �C t? Lr) U) O -L4 O O 00 vi• O O O O O O O O� CS, O O O O co O �o M N O N � � N bb E U O L Q O bD Q) Q 0 N m m U N a-+ 41 Q Q O E a) U C6 .N O m a--+ U Q O O O O ' ' ' ' O O •• O Lii O O O L6 I- ko O O �C N } 00 -L} O -L4 00 vi• U �o - N 0 Ln o O� N � E fu 4' = O L a) i E I • J m > M W i C N_ E co E a) 0 > O U � LL > i U O _ a) >- N +-+ 0 2 40 a) N .. > E o Q o Q E w o � a, i u Y -� Nw aa) 10 L.L O �� N _ ao � U Ln ao DoE N Y = a) v = aA , J = W C W • m U >>, dA _ -0dA i n N 1 a) m E m c N vi O O Ln a) n a) n L E E O U O ELu OAC > > a > U o c� U t ci W N >� N N O 4- p 4-+ p 4- p in • • O O O H Q- U cn U Ln U L bb E U O L Q O bD Q) Q 0 N m m U N a-+ 41 Q Q O E a) U C6 .N O m a--+ U Q 0 00 ri o M n ri 0 Ql ri O OR ri 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (on o (on o (on o (On M M N N ri ri O anlEA passassd algexel }o % e se jgad N o 0 N N O N o 0 N M O LLLn r� M N o 0 O 00 O N � O LL r� M N N0 en o 0 N Ln O LLen r� M N o 0 N (LR O LL r� M N N o 0 U>- U>- LL r4 M 0 O M O N 00 O U>- ri M (n o 0 0 0 0 N O O U>- N M 00 O � O N Ql O LL ri M n O O O N 00 O LL ri M 41 0 0 0 o w U .9 0 a s +1 E J a a U �i v U i v L to 4- -Q -t3 v r- -t3 v 4- 4- t3 3 r- Qja 4 a � U a V v N �a O ao N 3 C3 I Q, -C3 W w^ L ,a � a O a� V n a O rl N 0 0 O 0 O LR W 0 O n o "o n 00 � � � l0 0 0 0 0 CO UD V N sain;ipuadx3 JuauauaanOE) JeaauaE) }O % se aZ)inaaS 4gad N e 0 N� O � O LLLA O 14 0 N O O O LL Ln O M O N O O U- O C5 O 14 M O N M O LL tC O rI en O p O N Ln O O LL O t0 O N ^ O O LL 0 0 0 N r -I O O 0 0 0 N � O 6 O N � O N N O L}i ^ O C5 O LLn N 1p O O LL rl N W O O LL �� 4+ 0 0 v U .9 0 E 17� J17 1 1 U N O N 00 � � ^ 1 O Q N L, V - U N O N i O 0.� V .j 0.� 4, 0.� i a 4, 0.� 0.� t ftl 0 ui N Ln tm (3) (3) O 00 (3) l0 (3) N O lfl O m r -I m ,n tm 00 00 A V-1 n} Ln W tm tm o o �o Ln (3) N Lr m Ln o� 00 00 m n� O � � 0 bb _0 LLo m +� o �° ago L _0 o m = F Q) to O u> -0Z3 3 O 0 _0 C m O > � 41 t c0 41 O X u F.-++ 4-J H � 0 O aN-+ O ca C cu Z3 to N to ca � t,JJ O L7 v v v O v - '0 � � 41 4e -0 .7 � O0L Z3 Z 3 ~ x Ln Y N O p cn O +-+ Q Q p Q m p ca O ip0 Z3 i L 0 \ i U O U i 4-J bb � 00 � cn � 41 � m � � }' N cu U 3 • N i i!} fL6 .� cn OU m •� 41 0+� N 41O 41 • Ln r14 0 O U m U m . m N Q U �l — 41 00 41 �> m N E-6 U - j N u Ki X N Z O co n O N UT n� W W •� �nl W � o O �, Nuj � I riNri O } � •N � o N n� 1..� O E n l� W } } O U O C6 O or_ O _0 b.p 0 aN+ •6 h00 W a00 -0 a- ^cl L.L nl m � o }co co b.0 b.0 00 c� co v b.0 v r— Xc O �O +�O N �� Q)� o O0L o r14LL �LL H v o v t/1 05 _� N� m L L n' N 0 a-+ LL 0 W �+ NaN ..� _0 0 -0 O - O (A LL O L 4) m O ca O ca o L L w OL OL 2 OL I.IV� Q Q O Q ���� as a rn m i r14 N r -I O N E n l� W } } O U O C6 O or_ O _0 b.p 0 aN+ •6 h00 W a00 -0 a- ^cl L.L nl m � o }co co b.0 b.0 00 c� co v b.0 v r— Xc O �O +�O N �� Q)� o O0L o r14LL �LL H v o v t/1 05 _� N� m L L n' N 0 a-+ LL 0 W �+ NaN ..� _0 0 -0 O - O (A LL O L 4) m O ca O ca o L L w OL OL 2 OL I.IV� Q Q O Q ���� as a L•J ACTION NO. ITEM NO. M.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ISSUE: April 25, 2017 The petition of Richard Rife, Rife + Wood rezone approximately 0.374 acre from R-1, Residential, District to C-1, Low Intensity District, located at 3722 Colonial Avenue, Magisterial District Philip Thompson Deputy Director of Planning Thomas C. Gates County Administrator Architects, to Low Density Commercial, Cave Spring Agenda item for public hearing and second reading of ordinances on an application to rezone property from residential to commercial. BACKGROUND: The applicant is seeking to use the property for a hair salon (Personal Services). Personal Services is not a permitted use in the R-1 zoning district but is a permitted use in the C-1 zoning district. In 2006, the same property owners applied to rezone the parcel from R-1 to C-1 for the purpose of operating a hair salon. The Board of Supervisors denied that rezoning petition. Design Guidelines for development and redevelopment were developed as part of the Colonial Avenue Corridor Study in 2000. DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this request on April 4, 2017. Five Page 1 of 3 citizens spoke in opposition to the petition. Their concerns included increased traffic, allowing commercial traffic on a residential street, increase in the number of severe traffic accidents in the area, potential for parking on Green Valley Drive, need for this use, increase in storm water runoff, compatibility with the surrounding community, impact to the residential character and property values of the neighborhood, and Colonial Avenue becoming Brambleton Avenue. The Planning Commission had questions regarding traffic accidents in the area, storm water runoff, and the Colonial Avenue Design Guidelines. Staff stated that the application met many of the Colonial Avenue Design Guidelines but the application did not address right-of-way planting along Colonial Avenue, foundation plantings, lighting locations, and hours of operation. The Commission asked if the applicant would be willing to proffer hours of operation, and include the location of lighting and additional landscaping on a revised concept plan. Mr. Rife, agent for the applicant, stated that they would provide additional proffers and concept plan revisions in advance of the Board of Supervisors meeting. The Commission stated that it needed to be sensitive to the residential community surrounding Colonial Avenue and that the additional proffered conditions would limit any impact the business creates for the surrounding neighborhood. The Commission recommended approval of the rezoning request with the submitted and proposed proffered conditions. The revised proffers submitted by the applicant for this rezoning application are: 1. The property will be developed in substantial conformance with the Concept Plan prepared by Certified Landscape Architect Dan Chitwood dated April 10, 2017, copy attached. 2. A 10' wide right-of-way planting buffer will be established to screen the parking area from Green Valley Drive. 3. A 25' wide Type B planting buffer will be established along the rear property line. The planting buffer will incorporate the planting schedule, vegetation types and spacing as described within either option one or two of the Type B planting buffer standards. 4. Any lighting installed around the parking area shall be bollard -type fixtures no more than 4' in height. A photocopy of the type of fixture to be used is attached to this application. 5. Signage will be installed and maintained as follows: a. Any future freestanding sign shall be monument in style as defined by the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. The sign shall not exceed 24 square feet in face area, 5 feet in height and 7 feet in width. The sign shall be landscaped. The sign shall only be lit from the ground and shall not cause glare onto Colonial Avenue or adjacent properties. b. Attached building signage shall not cover more than 5 percent of the building fagade area. Page 2 of 3 c. Neon signage shall not be allowed on the property. d. Message or interchangeable sign boards shall not be allowed on the property. e. Temporary signage shall not be allowed on the property. 6. Operating hours shall be limited to 7:00 AM and 9:00 PM. The revised concept plan does not address the right-of-way plantings along Colonial Avenue as discussed at the Planning Commission meeting. In addition, the foundation planting shown on the revised concept plan should be labeled existing and proposed foundation plantings instead of existing foundation plantings. Staff has spoken to the applicant regarding the revised concept plan and the applicant indicated that a corrected plan would be submitted that is consistent with the Planning Commission's recommendation. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on this agenda item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the second reading of the ordinance to approve the rezoning request with proffered conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission. Page 3 of 3 Application to Rezone 3722 Colonial Avenue from R-1 to C-1, with conditions April 3, 2017, Revised April 10, 2017 Page Twelve Richard W. and Judith Taylor Wagner, the Owners of 3722 Colonial Avenue, Tax No. 077.18-03- 31.00-0000, request that their property be rezoned from the current R-1 category to C-1 (Personal Services) in order to operate a beauty salon on the property and hereby proffer the following conditions: 1. The property will be developed in substantial conformance with the Concept Plan prepared by Certified Landscape Architect Dan Chitwood dated April 10, 2017, copy attached. 2. A 10' wide right-of-way planting buffer will be established to screen the parking area from Green Valley Drive. 3. A 25' wide Type B planting buffer will be established along the rear property line. The planting buffer will incorporate the planting schedule, vegetation types and spacing as described within either option one or two of the Type B planting buffer standards. 4. Any lighting installed around the parking area shall be bollard -type fixtures no more than 4' in height. A photocopy of the type of fixture to be used is attached to this application. 5. Signage will be installed and maintained as follows: f. Any future freestanding sign shall be monument in style as defined by the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. The sign shall not exceed 24 square feet in face area, 5 feet in height and 7 feet in width. The sign shall be landscaped. The sign shall only be lit from the ground and shall not cause glare onto Colonial Avenue or adjacent properties. g. Attached building signage shall not cover more than 5 percent of the building facade area. h. Neon signage shall not be allowed on the property. L Message or interchangeable sign boards shall not be allowed on the property. j. Temporary signage shall not be allowed on the property. 6. Operating hours shall be limi ed to 7:00 AM and 9:00 PM. (iV Owne . v' Owner: Judith Tayl r Wagnee Aichard W. W er Date: Y"���" %�o Date: ' `13 -1-7 Fin 210: 9 rJC to #)�Y ..4..� .6. cp 7 1= UT C-4 r 9;0 Ila IPE ILI 0 07, SWIt 466 DAN CHITWOOD C7 rr?.M-n �WIVFCT ON N01, v,5 rap, - - t -N P. SCALE:1 2 20' JIDATE.4-W AN JDRWN BY: Cj(l & ISHEET W: I OF: Louvered 2800K LED Bollard BKT 16130BKT28 (Textured Black) Dimensions Height 29.50" Width 6.25" Kichler 7711 East Pleasant Valley Road Cleveland. Ohio 44131-a010 Toll free. 866.555.5706 or kichler.com Project Name: Location: Type: Qty: Comments: Ordering Information Product ID 16130BKT28 Finish Textured Black Available Finishes AZT, BKT Dimensions Weight 6.00 LBS Photometrics Kelvin Temperature 2813K Color Rendering Index 73 Specifications Material Aluminum Electrical Voltage 12V Operating Voltage Range 9-15V Qualifications Safety Rated Wet Warranty www.kichler.comlwarranty Primary Lamping Light Source LED Lamp Included Included Max or Nominal Watt 3.57W Lamp Type LED Notes: 1) Information provided is subject to change without notice. All values are design or typical values when measured under laboratory conditions. 2) Incandescent Equivalent: The incandescent equivalent as presented is an approximate number and is for reference only. STAFF REPORT Petitioner: Richard Rife, Rife and Wood Architects Request: To rezone from R-1, Low -Density Residential, to C-1, Low -Intensity Commercial, on approximately 0.374 acre Location: 3722 Colonial Avenue Magisterial District: Cave Spring Proffered Conditions: 1. The property will be developed in substantial conformance with the Concept Plan prepared by Certified Landscape Architect Dan Chitwood dated February 14, 2017. 2. A 10' wide right-of-way planting buffer will be established to screen the parking area from Green Valley Drive. 3. A 25' wide Type B planting buffer will be established along the rear property line. The planting buffer will incorporate the planting schedule, vegetation types and spacing as described within either option one or two of the Type B planting buffer standards. 4. Any future freestanding sign shall be monument in style as defined by the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. The sign shall not exceed 24 square feet in face area and shall be landscaped. The sign shall only be lit from the ground and shall not cause glare onto Colonial Avenue or adjacent properties. 5. Electronic message board signage shall not be allowed on the property. 6. Any lighting installed around the parking area shall be bollard -type fixtures no more than 4' in height. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Richard Rife, from Rife and Wood Architects, is petitioning to rezone a property located at 3722 Colonial Avenue from R-1, Low -Density Residential, to C-1, Low -Intensity Commercial, for the purposes of operating a Personal Services (hair salon) zoning use. The property is approximately 0.374 acre in size and is located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. The Future Land Use map designates this land parcel as Transition. This parcel is within the Colonial Avenue Design Guideline area, which provides for recommended, but not required, design elements for businesses regarding existing conditions, site layout, architectural treatment, landscaping, lighting, and signage. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS In the application, the petitioner indicates the owner's intent to operate a hair salon. The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance designates this commercial operation a personal services use, defined as: Personal Services: Establishments of places of business engaged in the provision of frequently or reoccurring needed services of a personal nature. Typical uses include beauty and barber shops, massage studios, grooming of pets, seamstresses, tailors, or shoe repairs; florists, and laundromats and dry cleaning stations serving individuals and households. The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance contains no Use and Design Standards associated with a Personal Services zoning use type. The Colonial Avenue Design Guidelines recommend property owners develop land parcels to follow standards specific to the Colonial Avenue corridor. The goal of these standards is to plan for and achieve compatibility between new and existing developments along Colonial Avenue. The applicant is proffering six conditions, five of which are in accordance with the Colonial Avenue Design Guidelines. Additionally, the character of both the building exterior and site meet more of the applicable design guidelines. A successful rezoning to C-1, Low -Intensity Commercial, requires the property owners comply with landscaping standards contained within Section 30-92 (Screening, Landscaping and Buffer Yards) of the Zoning Ordinance. Specifically, the Zoning Ordinance requires property owners install a type B buffer yard between C-1, Low -Intensity Commercial, and R-1, Low -Density Residential zoning, as stated in Section 30- 92-6. Additionally, the applicant is proffering two conditions that comply with the landscaping recommendations contained within the Colonial Avenue Design Guidelines. The Zoning Ordinance requires that, should the salon operate, the property must meet parking standards detailed in Section 30-91 (Off Street Parking, Stacking and Loading). Specifically, to operate a Personal Services zoning use of the size proposed by the applicant, the property owners would need to provide four parking spaces, one of which designated as disabled, to be compliant with the number and type of parking spaces required by Ordinance. The applicant is proposing six parking places, one of which would be designated as disabled. The property owner would add paved surface adjacent to existing parking in order to accommodate the two additional parking spaces. The existing and proposed parking area is/will be located at the rear of the building, as recommended by the Colonial Avenue Design Guidelines. 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background — The residence was constructed in 1956 and utilized as a single family home. Roanoke County never issued a license to operate a commercial business at the location. In 2006, the same property owners applied to rezone the parcel from R-1, Low -Intensity Residential to C-1, Low -Intensity Commercial zoning, for the purpose of operating a beauty salon. The Board of Supervisors denied that rezoning petition. To operate a hair salon as desired, the petitioner must rezone the land parcel to a commercial use type, where Roanoke County allows a Personal Service zoning use. As was true in 2006, the applicant is choosing to petition for Low -Intensity (C-1) zoning, as that zoning type allows for small scale, personal service businesses, like that proposed by the applicant. Since the property owners' last attempt to rezone the property, several other land parcels within the immediate area have transitioned from residential to commercial zoning. The property owners indicate the desire to install three salon chairs in the building, from which to operate their business. Topography/Vegetation — The land parcel is relatively flat with no natural or artificial watercourses present. One large deciduous tree exists along the front (West) of the building facing Colonial Avenue. Three medium sized deciduous trees exist along the South (Green Valley Road) side of the residence. Five large shrubs are present along the rear (East) property line. The adjacent commercially zoned property to the North of the subject parcel has established and maintained a type B buffer yard as consistent with the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. Surrounding Neighborhood — A C-1, Low -Intensity Commercially zoned parcel directly adjoins the subject parcel to the North. The subject parcel is two blocks North of the Promenade Park Shopping Center, zoned C-2, High Intensity Commercial, with Conditions. Within three blocks of the subject parcel, there are four C- 1 zoned parcels and three C-2 zoned parcels, several of which have been rezoned from residential to commercial use within the last decade. There are R-1, Low -Density Residential, zoned parcels along Colonial Avenue and Green Valley Drive East of the subject parcel, which contain single family residences. Many of these parcels have driveway access to Green Valley Drive alongside the subject parcel. The nearby C-1 zoned parcels currently consist of General Office, Medical Office, and Club zoning use types. The nearby C-2 zoned parcels consist of a Convenience Store and Equipment Sales and Rental zoning uses. The conditions proffered by the property owners of 3722 Colonial Avenue are roughly consistent with those accepted by the Board of Supervisors for similar properties transitioning to C-1 zoning along Colonial Avenue. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Lavout/Architecture — Consistent with Colonial Avenue Design Guidelines, the applicant proposes no permanent changes to the structure exterior, as to maintain the existing residential character of the building. The front of the building sits approximately fifty-nine (59) feet from Colonial Avenue. Existing parking is located to the rear of the building, also consistent with Colonial Avenue Guidelines, and is accessed directly from Green Valley Drive. The applicant proposes adding the extra parking spaces directly adjacent to existing parking on the East side of the building. The owner created four (4) parking places at the residence, the closest of which are located approximately forty-two (42) feet from the street, with another two (2) spaces proposed. The applicant provided a concept plan, which demonstrates a proposed site layout, and proffered a condition requiring substantial conformance with that plan. Although the owner does not propose or intend to install a freestanding sign at this time, the concept plan indicates the site of a freestanding sign if the property owner chooses to install one. Should the parcel owner decide to install a sign, they are proffering a condition limiting the style, size and lighting of any freestanding signage. Any sign installation would be subject to County review for conformance to both any proffer statement and Zoning Ordinance sign standards. The Zoning Ordinance requires a type B buffer yard between properties zoned C-1 and R-1, which the concept plan demonstrates along the East side of the property. The concept plan also annotates appropriate right of way plantings along the South side of the property, closest to Green Valley Drive. Access/Traffic Circulation — The subject parcel is directly accessed from Green Valley Drive, approximately one -hundred and forty-five (145) feet from Colonial Avenue. The closest residential driveway accessing Green Valley Drive is approximately ninety-nine (99) feet from the subject parcel, before any access or parking improvements. VDOT commented on this land use application indicating, in part, that entrance and egress from a commercial property would be governed by the VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix F: Access Management Design Standards for Entrances and Intersections. VDOT also indicated a land use permit will be required if the existing entrance is changed. Additionally, the owner could provide updated traffic summary calculations to VDOT if desired. The current daily traffic count for Colonial Avenue in front of the proposed business in ten thousand (10,000) vehicles per day. The current daily traffic count for the 3700 block of Green Valley Drive is three -hundred and fifty (350) vehicles per day. The Roanoke County Police Department did not comment on this land use application regarding either traffic congestion or collision volume. Traffic collision history for this area indicates that between 2012 and 2016, there were, on average, seven traffic collisions per year on Colonial Avenue between Electric and Popular Roads, between the hours of 9 am and 9 pm. In 2016, there were five traffic collisions in this area, in the time frame previously stated. Fire & Rescue/Utilities — The Roanoke County Fire Rescue Department does not object to the applicant's petition. Fire Marshal Simmons indicated any Fire Code requirements would be met under the Office of Building Safety change of use process. Mr. Simmons did want to ensure that any increased traffic related to the use does not increase the risk of traffic collisions in the immediate area. Economic Development — The Department supports the applicant's request, siting that a beauty salon is an appropriate commercial use in a Transitional land use area. Building Safety — Should the Board approve the rezoning request, Building Commissioner Morgan Yates states the property would need to undergo a Building Code change of use process. Community Meeting — A Community Meeting was held at the Roanoke County Administration Center on Thursday, March 16, 2017, from 6 to 8 p.m. One citizen attended this meeting. They obtained information regarding the applicant's proposal and asked questions regarding the use of the property. The individual expressed opposition to the proposed rezoning, siting concern regarding late hours of operation. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN The Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan designated the Future Land Use area of this property as Transition, which encourages the orderly development of highway frontage parcels. Transition areas generally serve as developed buffers between highways and nearby or adjacent lower intensity development. Intense retail and highway oriented commercial uses are discouraged in transition areas, which are more suitable for office, institutional and small-scale, coordinated retail uses, like that proposed by the applicant. The sought C-1, Low -Intensity Commercial, zoning does not allow for intensive commercial zoning uses. The Zoning Ordinance requires that a landscape buffer be installed between commercial properties and residential development. Because of these factors, and as Transitional areas favor the development of frontage parcels like Colonial Avenue, the applicants' proposal conforms to Roanoke County's Comprehensive Plan. 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS Staff anticipates that the proposed use (Personal Services) would have minimal impact on the surrounding neighborhood. The Colonial Avenue Design Guidelines recommends conditions to achieve compatibility between new and existing developments along Colonial Avenue. The applicant submitted six (6) proffered conditions with his application, five of which directly address Colonial Avenue Design recommendations. These conditions address concept plan conformance, landscaping, signage, and lighting, and serve to mitigate adverse impacts to the surrounding residential neighborhood. Additionally, general site characteristics regarding building and parking design already conform to Colonial Avenue recommendations. The petitioner submitted a concept plan, completed by a licensed architect, which details proposed layout of the site. The applicant also proffered a condition assuring substantial conformance with this concept plan. To date, one individual spoke against the petitioner's proposal. No other citizens contacted the department regarding this land use application. The proposed rezoning conforms to the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Other items that the Planning Commission may want to consider as proffered conditions include landscaping (foundation plantings around the building, planting along Colonial Avenue, and parking lot 0 landscaping), signage (limit building signage, prohibit neon signage, temporary signs, and interchangeable message boards, and establish a sign height and width for monument sign), lighting (freestanding or other), hours of operation, and limiting uses. CASE NUMBER: PREPARED BY: HEARING DATES: ATTACHEMENTS: 5-412017 Brian W. Hughes PC: 4/4/2017 BOS: 4/25/2017 Application Aerial Map Land Use Map Zoning Map Photographs R-1 District Standards C-1 District Standards Colonial Avenue Design Guidelines Countv of Roanoke For Staff Use Only Community Development Date received: Received by: Planning & Zoning 0,2- - 16 - 2-u 17 5< I 10 C kJ l f, Ap lication fee: PC/BZA date: 5204 Bemard Drive P O Box 29800 Placards issued: BOS date: Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 Case ]Number 's- — ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) )( Rezoning ❑ Special Use ❑ Variance ❑ Waiver ❑ Administrative Appeal ❑ Comp Plan (IS.2-2232) Review Applicants name/address w/zip Phone: 54o- 344 •l615 K;CkArA R4,-, Ki�,-+ V464A "ItcetS Work: 15240 GrawAE+n K&AA Cell #: K,4,,,4 f VA 7-'4015 Y'iGYldYd @+�l eWao�•l�WA Fax No.: 540-344-5148Z Owner's name/address whip Phone #; 540- '5549-'066 1z"A' A W. 4 JLAA;+6 I Wainer Work: '11ZZ Clovtia.t AvelAtke Fax No. #: VA Vom Property Location Cc>lotn�e�E A venues Magisterial District: Lave Sprig Community Planning area: tao]ortiat Aentae 4arrtdo►- TaxMap No.: O�I�I•��_Cy3"3I•C�D-04pQ Existing Zoning: K I Size of parcel(s): Acres: 0.369 Existing Land Use: 5irtJ1¢,-;qmt ( A ve.5trxeoez REZONING, SPECIAL. USE PERMIT, WAIVER AND. COMP PLAN (ls 2-2232} REVIEW APPLICANTS (R/S/W/CP) Proposed Zoning: C - f�►r5ov�a 1 +ry rt e5� L64W it i tn►�ad Proposed Land Use: 15ec K+ 5g1ar1 Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes X No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes)( No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes No VARIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (W/AA) Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF T ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. HESE R/SIW/CP V/AA RIS/W/CP V/AA RISIW/CP WAA Consultation 8 112" x I I" concept plan Application fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property oi,j downer's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent f the owner. i ff Owner's Signature 2 JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT WAIVER OR COMP PLAN (15.2-2232) REVIEW REQUESTS Applicant KtGk,%y-d KITS . Idl e+�aad AYE ti'Eec�s -- �¢ZotritVtG oT 3722 4�4v,1a( Ave The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit waiver or community plan (15.2-2232) review requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. See A4d,4kMer1-+. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. lwe 1"['T i eL-r— ,evv+ Please describe the irnpact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. Seo- M+AAmemt. CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may he altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver, community plan (15.2-2232) review and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS X a. Applicant name and name of development X b. Date, scale and north arrow X c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions X d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties X c. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. X f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties g. All property lines and easements h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights __X__ i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development x j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information requiredfor REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMITAPPLICANTS Nih k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site X 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers N1/k m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals N�Pr n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants X p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed lU A- q. if project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. Signature of applicant 4 2f9-11 7 Date M p A 61 Community Development , , Planning & Zoning Division z` z NOTICE TO ,APPLICANTS FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION WAIVER, PUBLIC STREET WAIVER, OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver or Special Use Permit petition if new or additional information is presented at the public hearing. If it is the opinion of the majority of the Planning Commissioners present at the scheduled public hearing that sufficient time was not available for planning staff and/or an outside referral agency to adequately evaluate and provide written comments and suggestions on the new or additional information prior to the scheduled public hearing then the Planning Commission may vote to continue the petition. This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the new or additional information and provide written comments and suggestions to be included in a written memorandum by planning staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall consult with planning staff to determine if a continuance may be warranted. POTENTIAL OF NEED FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND/OR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The Roanoke County Planning Commission reserves the right to continue a Rezoning, Subdivision Waiver, Public Street Waiver, or Special Use Permit petition if the County Traffic Engineer or staff from the Virginia Department of Transportation requests further traffic analyses and/or a traffic impact study that would be beneficial in making a land use decision (Note: a list of potential land uses and situations that would necessitate further study is provided as part of this application package). This continuance shall allow sufficient time for all necessary reviewing parties to evaluate the required traffic analyses and/or traffic impact study and to provide written comments and/or suggestions to the planning staff and the Planning Commission. If a continuance is warranted, the applicant will be notified of the continuance and the newly scheduled public hearing date. Effective date: April '19, 2005 Am It - �fe-aZ" e 31ZZ �C i�lx�uG -2 f � Name of etition Petitioner' ignature Z,11461& Date Application to Rezone 3722 Colonial Avenue from R-1 to C -I., with conditions February 14, 2017 Page Nine Richard W. and Judith Taylor Wagner, the Owners of 3722 Colonial Avenue, Tax No. 077.18-03- 31.00-0000, request that their property be rezoned from the current R-1 category to C-1 (Personal Services) in order to operate a beauty salon on the property. The property is more fully described as: Lot 5, Section 2, Green Valleys BEGINNING at a point on Bent Mountain Road at the northwest corner of Lot 1, Section 2, Green Valleys; thence leaving said road, S. 36 degrees 30 minutes E. 164.98 feet to a point; thence N. 53 degrees 30 minutes E. 100.00 feet to a point on Green Valley Drive; thence with the same N. 36 degrees 30 minutes W. 138.84 feet to a point; thence with a curved line to the right having an arc distance of 38.97 feet to a point on Bent Mountain Road; thence N. 52 degrees 49 minutes E 75.05 feet to the point of BEGINNING. The following conditions are hereby proffered as conditions of the rezoning: 1. The property will be developed in substantial conformance with the Concept Plan prepared by Certified Landscape Architect Dan Chitwood dated February 14, 2017, copy attached. 2. A 10' wide right-of-way planting buffer will be established to screen the parking area from Green Valley Drive. 3. A 25' wide Type B planting buffer will be established along the rear property line. The planting buffer will incorporate the planting schedule, vegetation types and spacing as described within either option one or two of the Type B planting buffer standards. 4. Any future freestanding sign shall be monument in style as defined by the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. The sign shall not exceed 24 square feet in face area and shall be landscaped. The sign shall only be lit from the ground and shall not cause glare onto Colonial Avenue or adjacent properties. 5. Electronic message board signage shall not be allowed on the property. 6. Any lighting installed around the parking area shall be bollard -type fixtures no more than 4' in height. How the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance: The italicized quotations cited below are from the C-1 "Purpose" section of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. • The request to allow a hair salon supports the purpose of the C-1 low intensity commercial district, which "is to provide for the development of attractive and efficient office and commercial uses in the urban service area which serve both community and county -wide needs. " • The proposed use is consistent with the C-1 district goals to allow "for varying intensities of office and commercial development [such] as small scale office and commercial uses " The proposed use is a small scale commercial use that utilizes an existing structure. Application to Rezone 3722 Colonial Avenue from R-1 to C-1, with conditions February 14, 2017 Page Ten • The property is located in a "Transition" Zone on the Future Land Use Map: "Land uses permitted in the C-1 district are generally consistent with the recommendations set forth in the transition and core land use categories of the comprehensive plan.,/ • The proposed use fronts on Colonial Avenue in compliance with the statement that "C-1 districts are most appropriately found along ... major arterial streets where existing commercial development has occurred and/or where commercial zoning has been established, or near existing residential development where it would serve as a logical buffer strip between conflicting land use types. " The property is the only property on the south side of Colonial Avenue between Green Valley Road and the Garden Club driveway that is not already zoned C-1 or C-2. All of these properties form a buffer between Colonial Avenue and the residential properties behind them. • The Purpose section also states that "Site developmentstandards are intended to ensure compatibility with adjacent land uses. " The property, as currently developed, meets those standards: o Minimum Lot Area: 15,000 square feet. Actual Area: 16,291 sf. o Minimum Road Frontage: 75. Actual: 100 feet. o Minimum Front yard Setback: 30 feet Actual: 48.2 feet. o Minimum Side yard Setback: Same as front Actual: 22.5 feet. yard for a corner lot, except 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building line. o Rear yard: 15 feet. Actual: 75 feet. o Maximum Lot Coverage: 80% of lot area. Proposed: Approx. 66%. Personal Services such as a beauty salon are permitted uses in the C-1 zone. How the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan: Please see the attached Concept Plan prepared by Certified Landscape Architect Dan Chitwood which illustrates how the Owner plans to conform to the Colonial Avenue Corridor Plan and other Roanoke County development standards. The application conforms to the Colonial Avenue Corridor Plan in the following ways: • It reuses an existing residential structure to preserve the existing residential character of the corridor. • The front yard character of the nearby residential properties is being preserved. • The property conforms to all development standards for setbacks and lot coverage. • The parking will be located in the rear yard as recommended by the Corridor Plan's Design Guidelines. • The existing vehicular entrance will be reused; no new curb cuts. • A 10' wide right-of-way planting buffer will be established to screen the parking area from Green Valley Drive as recommended by the Corridor Plan's Landscaping guidelines. Application to Rezone 3722 Colonial Avenue from R-1 to C-1, with conditions February 14, 2017 Page Eleven • A 25' wide Type B planting buffer will be established along the rear property line to separate the applicant's C-1 property from the adjoining residential property as recommended by the Corridor Plan's Landscaping guidelines. The planting buffer will incorporate the planting schedule, vegetation types and spacing as described within either option one or two of the Type B planting buffer standards. • Any future freestanding sign shall be monument in style as defined by the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. The sign shall not exceed 24 square feet in face area and shall be landscaped. This is smaller than the S' x 7' sign size limitation recommended by the Corridor Plan's Signage guidelines. • The sign shall only be lit from the ground and shall not cause glare onto Colonial Avenue or adjacent properties. Electronic message board signage shall not be allowed on the property. • ' Any lighting installed around the parking area shall be bollard -type fixtures no more than 4' in height. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/ recreation and fire and rescue. The property will maintain its residential appearance if this rezoning request is approved. The primary physical change will be a rearrangement of the existing rear yard parking area to provide the six parking spaces required for a commercial property of this size. The existing access drive will be widened to 24' wide as required by the zoning ordinance. No additional vehicular entrances will be added. Planting buffers will be added to screen the parking area and provide separation from the adjacent residential property as described above. The impact of the zoning change on neighboring properties should be minimal, vehicular traffic during the business day will be somewhat higher than it is currently. This increase should be offset by the corresponding decrease in night time traffic when the salon is closed. A traffic study for converting this property to a beauty salon use conducted in 2007 is attached to this application. We foresee no negative impact on the road network, utility services, or fire / rescue services. A commercial use will not generate school students or parks / recreation users. Owner: Judith Taylor W5Aner Date: .. Owner: RiiccharcVW. Wagner Date: Application to Rezone 3722 Colonial Avenue from R-1 to C-1, with conditions February 14, 2017 Page Twelve Richard W. and Judith Taylor Wagner, the Owners of 3722 Colonial Avenue, Tax No. 077.18-03- 31.00-0000, request that their property be rezoned from the current R-1 category to C-1 (Personal Services) in order to operate a beauty salon on the property and hereby proffer the following conditions: 1. The property will be developed in substantial conformance with the Concept Plan prepared by Certified Landscape Architect Dan Chitwood dated February 14, 2017, copy attached. 2. A 10' wide right-of-way planting buffer will be established to screen the parking area from Green Valley Drive. 3. A 2S' wide Type B planting buffer will be established along the rear property line. The planting buffer will incorporate the planting schedule, vegetation types and spacing as described within either option one or two of the Type B planting buffer standards. 4. Any future freestanding sign shall be monument in style as defined by the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. The sign shall not exceed 24 square feet in face area and shall be landscaped. The sign shall only be lit from the ground and shall not cause glare onto Colonial Avenue or adjacent properties. S. Electronic message board signage shall not be allowed on the property. 6. Any lighting installed around the parking area shall be bollard -type fixtures no more than 4' in height. Owner: Owner: a/ Judith Taylor Yagner Richar W. Wagner Date: _ Date: CT MAI Application to Rezone 3722 Colonial Avenue from R-1 to C-1, with conditions February 14, 2017 Page Thirteen Adjacent properties: Stephen M. Harrell 3716 Colonial Avenue Roanoke, VA 24018 Tax No. 077.18-03-24.00-0000 Brijan Patel 3730 Colonial Avenue Roanoke, VA 24018 Tax No. 077.18-03-32.00-0000 JRG-1, Inc. 3737 Colonial Avenue Roanoke, VA 24018 Tax No. 077.18-04-32.00-0000 Bryan J. Thornhill 3725 Colonial Avenue Roanoke, VA 24018 Tax No. 077.18-04-33.00-0000 Kathy E. Peters 3719 Colonial Avenue Roanoke, VA 24018 Tax No. 077.18-04-34.00-0000 Mary H. Smith 3713 Colonial Avenue Roanoke, VA 24018 Tax No. 077.18-04-11.00-0000 Zoning: C-1CS Zoning: R-1 Zoning: R-1 Zoning: R-1 Zoning: R-1 Zoning: R-1 Edwin V. Sjolander & Mary Ann Selander 3718 Green Valley Road Roanoke, VA 24018 Tax No. 077.18-30.00-0000 Roanoke TLC Properties Zoning: R-1 3717 Thompsons Lane Roanoke, VA 24018 Tax No. 077.18-03-25.00-0000 Zoning; R-1 a T ear.) 13 it }F'- s '�1� �^ +�� ,kP �q ='--tet � ��" it's !),kN cnrnvom) C OH C F=. VL lkt--1 ISCALE. JDATE: • IDRWN BY: ISHEET NO.: 6 OF: Ll W -m A= 90'29'12" R= 25.00' T= 25.2 1 ' L = 39.48' BRG. S 8'09'25 " W CHO, 35.51' COLONIAL AVENUE EX. IRON PIN BEARS 50' R/W S 56 ;3726" W 0.58' FROM CORNER N 5249'30" E-75-05' G EX. IRON PIN EX. IRON PIN BEARS 5 52'J8'5.3" W 0.45' FROM CORNER J c� 00 -. Q4 a 0 a oa'o 30' M.B.L. 0.6 ^' (P. B. 3, PG. 192 EX. STONE r �-.--.-.-� FLOWER BOX 5.2' X 7.3' 22.5' f F7CONC, CONC. STOOP 13.1' 45.2' 1 STORY BRICK A a RANCH 13722 A 45.2' L .'CONC Y EX. CONC. STOOP & ' STEPS WITH WALL i ] +- 4' CONC. WALK LEGEND R/W RIGHT OF WAY CONC. CONCRETE EX SHED ON CONC. OVER ONTO LOT 1 ASPHALT f RIVE __.. ...... . PIN SET E EX IRON PIN 100.00' ----- S 5,37,30'00" W LOT 6 - EX. BRICK WALL EXTENDS ONTO LOT 5 LOT 1 SECTION NO. 2 "GREEN VALLEYS" (P. B. 3, PG. 192) 0.6' 03 EX. IRON PIN LOT 2 rn 6 `" :f, TAX #77.18.03-31 LOT 5 0.374 AC. a� EX SHED ON CONC. OVER ONTO LOT 1 ASPHALT f RIVE __.. ...... . PIN SET E EX IRON PIN 100.00' ----- S 5,37,30'00" W LOT 6 - EX. BRICK WALL EXTENDS ONTO LOT 5 LOT 1 SECTION NO. 2 "GREEN VALLEYS" (P. B. 3, PG. 192) 0.6' 03 EX. IRON PIN LOT 2 Tim Beard -Trip G...e.n, Report,476707.pof 2 HSMM I AECOM TRIP GENERATION STUDY ""M Brambleton Studio HSMM Commission 30204 April 6, 2007 Tiro Beard -Trip Gen F�aport 4_6_07.r 6 07 p - age 3 - Brambleton Studio Trip Generation Study Table of Contents 1.0 bitroduction and Study Purpose 2.0 Existing Salon....................................................................................•...........,......•.. 2 3.0 Observed Existing Volurnes.................................•.................................................................,..2 4.0 Trip Generation, Rates for Existing Brambleton S#udio....•.............................. ........................3 5.0 THP Generation for the Proposed Colonial Avenue Site ....... ....................................................4 List of Figures Figure1 - Location Map..................................................................................................................1 Figure 2 - Existing Mid -Day peak Hour Traffic Volume ............................... ......... .2 Figure -3 Existing PM Peak Hour Traffio Volume ........................................... . Appendices Appendix A.- Existing Traf o Counts (April 4, 2007) HSMM, Ixtc, i April G, 2007 Tim Beard - Trip Gen Report.1-6-07 pdf „ ........ — �s Page d Brambleton Studio Trip Gonem6on Study .1.0 Intra duction and Study Purpose Richard Wagner is the owner of Brambleton Studio, a beauty salon located at 2937 Brambleton Avenue in Roanoke County. He has proposed creating a similar but smaller studio at a location less than a mile away at the corner of Colonial Avenue and Green Valley Arivc, also in Roanoke County. As part of the rezoning application review, the Virginia Department of -Transportation and Roanoke County are interested in the traffic impacts of the proposed studio. Typical traffic impact studies are based oil trip generation productions fiona multiple studies of similar facilities of various sizes and numerous locations. The most commonly used resource for these studies is the Instifuta of Transportation Engine= (ITB) 'Trip Generation Manual, currently in its 7th Edition. This nook contains data on hips: for a variety of land uses; however, no appropriate rate for a stand alone bdauly salon is included. Therei`ore, detorimining the traffic impact of the proposed salon required a specific study of a similar facility in'die local area. This report documents the methodology, findings, and conclusions of that study, and is intended to provide realistic estimates of the number of trips expected to be generated by the proposed studio daring the mid-day and evening peak periods. This information should assist VDOT and Roanoke County in their evaluation of the proposed rezoning. Pigure 1 depicts the location of the existing Brambleton Studio. r(igute 1- Location Map IISMM, Inc. 1 April G, 2007 -.....:............:...:P....a_ 9iimBeard-TripGeepot4-0pfn RrG7.d,.. ,. Ermnbleton Studio Trip Generation Study 2,0 Existing Salon The existing Brambleton Studio includes 14 total work stations with 12 work stations being designated for hair soMoes and 2 work stations being used for nail services, Each of the work stations are occupied by independent contractors, There are 21 parking spaces available for the Brambleton Studio. 3.0 Observed Existing Volumes Turning movement counts were collected by HSMM on April 4a', 2007 at the -Brambleton Studio, As this week falls before Easter, the salon was relatively busy, with all hair cutting stations actively serving customers, so the observed traffio generation should be on the high end (i.e. conservative end) of the expected. range. These volumes were collected to quantify existing entering and exiting volumes fofthe nrid-day and PM Pear hour for Brambleton Studio, The data was collected by an HSMM employee who observed the driveway of the studio and recorded entering and exiting traffic and tabulated the results for each 15 minute period between 11:20 am to 1:30 pm qnd again from 3:30 p.m, to 6:30 p.m, As a backup documentation of these counts, videotapes of the entrance drive were made during these count periods. These can be made available for review if requested. During the mid-day peak horn` (11:30 to 12:30) there were a total of 15 trips generated with forty-seven percent of those trips entering (7) and fifty-three percent of the tiips exiting (8), The PM peak hour (4:00 to.5:00) yielded 27 total trips with 67% entering (18) and 33% exiting (9). The existing peals hour trip distributions ave, depioted in Figure 2 and Figure 3. - Thc f"ni ;g movement count. data collectibn shects for this project are included in Appendix A, e�A79d�troR ZU00 th kr rive Figure 2 -Existing Mid -Day Peale Hour Traffic Volumes HSMM, Inc. 2 Aprit 6, 2007 Pag Tim_eard - Trig Gcq Report 4-6-07.pdfi .. _ . e ..._ ... Brmnbletotr Studio Trip Generation Stpdy cw+o.�w �mnrn..�c�:o.��or+.n�rnnn.�wo.ry�in.�win.�. i�nnr•.n� ;J, eirzti�tt3tie-ri lQtf . 5'flJDTf], Figure 3 -Existing PAI Peak Hour Traffic Volumes QA Trip Generation Rates for Exisdng $rgmbleton Studio Trip generation rates -were computed using the previously discussed -driveway cbunts for Brambleton Studio during the mid-day and PM peak hours. Since the tra.t'Ftc counts v�ere obtained during a holiday week -(Easter), -the volumes represent a higher more conservative approach than a typical work day. With 15 trips for 14 stations, #lie generation rate is slightly over 1 trip per station for the midday peak (with 7 trips or 47% entering and 8 trips or 53% exiting). With about 27 trips for 14 stations, the generation rate is just below 2 traps per station for the p.m, peak (with 18 trips or 67% entering and 9 trips or 33% exiting). Trip Generation is delineated in Table 4.1. This produces approximately 1 trip per work station in the raid-daypeak hour and Iess than 2 trips per work station in the PM peak hour. 5,0 Projected Trip Generatio-u for Colonial Avenge Site Based on the. trip generation rates for the existing Brambleton Studio of one (1) trip per station in the midday peak and two (2) trips per station in the pm peak, the expected number of total trips for the proposed 5 station Colonial Avenue site is about 5 (about 2 entering and 3 exiting) in the midday peak and about 10 in the evening peak (about 7 entering and 3 exiting), This eluates to one vehiole entering every nine (9) minutes and one vehicle leaving every twenty minutes. HSMM, Inc. 3 April 6, 2007 Brambleton Studio Trip Generation Study Appeudh A. HSABI Traffic Count Worhsheets April 4, 2007 145mm, Tue. A-1 April 6, 2007. Tim Board - Trip. Gen Report 4-6-07 I.j Trip Generation Study Branbletbn Studio Today's Date. 4 AFS lWather Conditions SQ6,"o- ST TrafficCouater(HSA" C",9 PAV+s. Time (Nt)ouPe;,k) ,r Approach y� N13 TO SB TO (BrambletonSfudios) (BrambletouStudios) 3infaring Baiting Lrnfering L?xiting 11:45-12;00 12:15-12:30 ( 3 E 12:30-12:45 ) 12:45-1:00 Co LJ to OTRf. �I1�,n I a �FA• � 1rX�i'a_y�C ..� Ni3 To 5fj o ("I C M El �p Trip Ge► onfion Study BrambIrtm Studio Today's Date 4 hpg)t- 20D•7 Weathu Conditions �U,7tii% #7 ura€Jn] tpY� Traffic Comfex WSW C � � Q i7AV15 Tlnte TAI Peak) Approach rte MR (Bramb)etou Studio's) 8B (13rambleton Studios) Bntering Exiting- tntaring Fxffiug� 3:30-3:45 } o ' a h 3:45-4:00.A. 9 { 4;00-4:]5 o� III/ 4:154;30 - [a 4:30 4:85Ao Jill) q 4:45-5:00. 11 no s;oo-5:35 3 (�} 5:35-5:30 t �r 5:30-5:45 J ( } 5:4$-6:00 G:00 -b:15 ° in, O(o k EM i01h Cnl g-ws Z4 Co 0 3 0 0 N 0)N co pp N (U \V6 � O .2 (n o 00 o � ci N o U N > U N 11 N L _ Z N 0 N N o N 0) U j5 LL UN cn � N CV Q N o o Z ch �' vi vi m OO Q Q m - tl1 e co Q � ) ) � ) ) ) ) ) o_ � 6 � ) ) F.W. ) ) § � § ) G ) G � � ) � ) ) � ) � ) ) � � ) ) � ) � ) � 2 ) o ) ) � / ) ) G ) « ! D k / © \ ~� \ / ! -E / / / \ L -~ _ \ / ® )) )# [§ d o j f 8 a = 4 2 o± a» A 3 _ _ / o_ y N / 3 - \ 0 / \ $ ) U)- � d % 3 § o § x o , � i. �� � I .;p I i � � si y �n v ao «�: � ,.. i.` ,f`` � I ,� •1 MIT pf-art ft-wiiiiw -2z-ur-cab - MIT __11al! 7" HHHHHH HHH'-9 A R-1 District Regulations SEC. 30-41. R-1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-41-1. Purpose. (A) The R-1, low density residential district is established for areas of the county within the urban service area with existing low -middle density residential development, with an average density of from one (1) to three (3) units per acre, and land which appears appropriate for such development. These areas are generally consistent with the neighborhood conservation land use category as recommended in the comprehensive plan. In addition, where surrounding development and the level of public services warrant, these areas coincide with the development category recommended in the plan. This district is intended to provide the highest degree of protection from potentially incompatible uses and residential development of a significantly different density, size, or scale, in order to maintain the health, safety, appearance and overall quality of life of existing and future neighborhoods. In addition to single-family residences, only uses of a community nature which are generally deemed compatible are permitted in this district. This would include parks and playgrounds, schools and other similar neighborhood activities. (Ord. No. 042799-11, § If., 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08) Sec. 30-41-2. Permitted uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. Agricultural and Forestry Uses Stable, Private * 2. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment * Home Beauty/Barber Salon * Home Occupation, Type I * Manufactured Home * Manufactured Home, Emergency * Multiple Dog Permit * R-1 District Regulations Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Attached * Single Family Dwelling, Attached (Cluster Subdivision Option) Single Family Dwelling, Detached Single Family Dwelling, Detached (Cluster Subdivision Option) Single Family Dwelling, Detached (Zero Lot Line Option) 3. Civic Uses Community Recreation * Family Day Care Home Park and Ride Facility * Public Parks and Recreational Areas * Utility Services, Minor 4. Commercial Uses Bed and Breakfast * 5. Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower * Wind Energy System, Small * (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Residential Uses Alternative Discharging Sewage System * 2. Civic Uses Cemetery * 2 R-1 District Regulations Crisis Center Day Care Center * Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary * Religious Assembly * Utility Services, Major 3. Commercial Uses Golf Course * 4. Miscellaneous Uses Outdoor Gatherings * (Ord. No. 42793-20, § II, 4-27-93; Ord. No. 62293-12, §§ 3, 8, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 62795-10, 6-27-95; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042500-9, § II, 4-25-00; Ord. No. 072605-7, § 1, 7-26-05; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08; Ord. No. 052609-22, § 1, 5-26-09; Ord. No. 030811-1, § 1, 3-8-11; Ord. No. 052411-9, § 1, 5-24-11, Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13) Sec. 30-41-3. Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. (A) Minimum lot requirements. 1. All lots served by private well and sewage disposal systems: a. Area: 0.75 acre (32,670 square feet). b. Frontage: 90 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 2. Lots served by either public sewer or water: a. Area: 20,000 square feet. b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 3. All lots served by both public sewer and water: a. Area: 7,200 square feet. 3 R-1 District Regulations b. Frontage: 60 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. (B) Minimum setback requirements. 1. Front yard: a. Principal structures: 30 feet. b. Accessory structures: Behind the front building line. 2. Side yard: a. Principal structures: 10 feet. b. Accessory structures: 10 feet behind front building line or 3 feet behind rear building line. 3. Rear yard: a. Principal structures: 25 feet. b. Accessory structures: 3 feet. 4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. (C) Maximum height of structures. 1. Height limitations: a. Principal structures: 45 feet. b. Accessory structures: 15 feet, or 25 feet provided they comply with the setback requirements for principal structures. (D) Maximum coverage. 1. Building coverage: 35 percent of the total lot area for all buildings and 7 percent for accessory buildings. 2. Lot coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 42694-12, § 8, 4-26-94; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08, Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13) El C-1 District Regulations SEC. 30-53. C-1 LOW INTENSITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 30-53-1. Purpose. (A) The purpose of the C-1 low intensity commercial district is to provide for the development of attractive and efficient office and commercial uses in the urban service area which serve both community and county -wide needs. The C-1 district allows for varying intensities of office and commercial development as part of either a planned office complex or, to a limited degree, small scale office and commercial uses. The C-1 districts are most appropriately found along or near major arterial streets where existing commercial development has occurred and/or where commercial zoning has been established, or near existing residential development where it would serve as a logical buffer strip between conflicting land use types. Land uses permitted in the C-1 district are generally consistent with the recommendations set forth in the transition and core land use categories of the comprehensive plan. Site development standards are intended to ensure compatibility with adjacent land uses. (Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08, Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13) Sec. 30-53-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment * Home Beauty/Barber Salon * Home Occupation, Type I * Multi -family Dwelling * Two-family Dwelling * 2. Civic Uses Administrative Services Clubs Cultural Services Day Care Center * Educational Facilities, College/University Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary * Guidance Services Park and Ride Facility * Post Office Public Parks and Recreational Areas * Safety Services * Utility Services, Minor 3. Office Uses Financial Institutions General Office Medical Office 4. Commercial Uses Agricultural Services * Antique Shops Bed and Breakfast Business Support Services Business or Trade Schools Communications Services Consumer Repair Services Personal Improvement Services Personal Services 2 C-1 District Regulations C-1 District Regulations Studio, Fine Arts Veterinary Hospital/Clinic 5. Miscellaneous Uses Amateur Radio Tower Parking Facility (B) The following uses are allowed only by special use permit pursuant to section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards as listed in article IV, use and design standards, for those specific uses. 1. Civic Uses Religious Assembly Utility Services, Major 2. Office Uses Laboratories 3. Commercial Uses Automobile Rental/Leasing Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation Restaurant, Drive-in or Fast Food Restaurant, General Retail Sales 4. Industrial Uses Landfill, Rubble Recycling Centers and Stations 5. Miscellaneous Uses Broadcasting Tower 3 C-1 District Regulations Outdoor Gatherings * (Ord. No. 82493-8, § 2, 8-24-93; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99; Ord. No. 042203-13, § 1, 4- 22-03; Ord. No. 042208-16, § 1, 4-22-08, Ord. No. 111213-15, § 1, 11-12-13) Sec. 30-53-3. Site Development Regulations. General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses, see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. (A) Minimum lot requirements. 1. Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system; a. Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet). b. Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. 2. Lots served by either public sewer or water, or both: a. Area: 15,000 square feet. b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. (B) Minimum setback requirements. 1. Front yard: a. Principal structures: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building line. b. Accessory structures: Behind front building line. 2. Side yard: None. 3. Rear yard: a. Principal structures: 15 feet. b. Accessory structures: 3 feet. 4. Where a lot fronts on more than one (1) street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. (C) Maximum height of structures. El C-1 District Regulations 1. Height limitations: a. Principal structures: When adjoining property zoned R-1 or R-2, forty-five (45) feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased, provided each required side and rear yard adjoining the R-1 or R-2 district is increased two (2) feet for each foot in height over forty-five (45) feet. In all other locations the height is unlimited unless otherwise restricted by this ordinance. b. Accessory structures: 15 feet. (D) Maximum coverage. Building coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. 2. Lot coverage: 80 percent of the total lot area. (Ord. No. 62293-12, § 10, 6-22-93; Ord. No. 052411-9, § 1, 5-24-11) COLONIAL AVENUE CORRIDOR DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT/REDEVELOPMENT Background Colonial Avenue provides a vital link in the regional highway network from the inner city of Roanoke to the outlying suburbs of Roanoke County. As development has increased over the years around the inner city area, the function of Colonial Avenue has stayed the same. This increase in development has had a direct impact on the roadway as traffic volumes rise steadily. High traffic volumes and the availability of developable land often cause developers to seek locations along such corridors for new commercial development. This situation has begun along the Colonial Avenue corridor. As commercial.pressures increase, the importance of protecting established neighborhoods and ensuring the safe and efficient flow of traffic becomes more crucial. It is also important to ensure a comfortable transition for existing residential frontage properties if neighboring parcels become commercial. Compatibility can be improved upon, if not achieved, through the proper use of building style, orientation and location, landscaping, signage, lighting, parking concepts and access management. Staff recommends the following site design guidelines - particularly on Colonial Avenue frontage properties - for development or redevelopmentin the corridor. Goal To plan for and achieve compatibility between new and existing developments along the corridor. Design Guidelines Objectives To encourage well designed, aesthetically pleasing developments that make a positive contribution to the streetscape and lessen potential negative impacts on adjacent residential properties. To encourage architectural compatibility with the surrounding residential character. To minimize impacts to traffic flow from new developments. To encourage the use of landscaping to improve environmental quality within new developments, enhance property values and create an enduring community image. To limit light pollution onto adjacent residential areas and encourage human scale in detail lighting. To minimize sign clutter by encouraging attractive, well-placed signage. I. Existing Conditions A. The proposed development should show sensitivity to the existing residential character of the corridor by incorporating as many of the following as possible: The preservation and use of existing residential structures for small offices (architecturally compatible alterations and additions are permitted), or the construction of new buildings having a distinct residential character. 2. The preservation and incorporation of existing vegetation. 3. Front yard character that is a common feature of residential properties should be preserved_ 4. Depending upon terrain, the use of terraced parking lots, minimizing their visual and site impacts, may be appropriate. 5. Existing drainage ways should be protected and incorporated into all proposals. II. Site Layout A. Buildings 1. A building should be prominent from street view, using its architecture as advertising. 2. Setbacks should be determined according to ultimate road right-of-way. 3. Minimum distance between a building, off-street parking, driveway, loading space or paved surfaces and any contiguous residential property should be 25 feet. B. Parking 1. Parking should be constructed to the rear and sides of buildings only. Street frontage should be devoted to building architecture and landscaping. 2. Parking areas should be designed to allow fixture interconnections with adjacent parcels. 3. Where feasible, break up required parking into smaller areas spaced throughout the site, lessening their visual and environmental impacts. 4. Alternative surface materials, such as pervious pavement, are recommended. Asphalt pavement should be minimized to mitigate existing drainage problems. C. Site Access 1. Where feasible, businesses should share access points from the street right-of-way. Temporary access points may be utilized until further development of the corridor allows for combined access. These temporary permits are issued with the understanding that they will be closed when a satisfactory alternate access in available in the opinion of the local governing body. 2. At the time of project approval property owners should provide a joint easement agreement allowing cross access to and from other properties in the surrounding area and a unified parking and circulation plan should be established wherever feasible. III. Architectural Treatment A. Scale 1. Size of buildings should approach a residential scale. Avoid excessive height and buildings out of scale with adjacent structures. 2. Where larger buildings are proposed, landscaping and architectural facades should be used to lessen their impact. 3. Where infilling between existing residential structures, maintain a continuity of building height, width, first floor elevation, architectural style and porch detailing, if applicable. B. Entrances 1. Design entrances that are clearly visible and easily recognizable from parking lots and walkways which serve the building. 2. The principal "front" facade should face Colonial Avenue, for all buildings directly adjacent to the road, although the major pedestrian entrance may be in the back or side of the structure. C. Materials 1. Materials should be selected for harmony with the surrounding community and for suitability to the type of building and style in which they are used. 2. Exterior materials such as exposed concrete block, metal or brightly colored siding are not recommended. Materials should be in the range of earth tones. D. Roofs Utilize dormers, gables and other variations in roof shapes and/or heights that are compatible with the basic facade elements and add interest and scale to the building. Avoid flat roofs. Gable roofs, hip roofs and multiple plain roofs are encouraged. IV. Landscaping A. Native Vegetation 1. Landscape plans should incorporate the use of native vegetation. B. Adjacent Right -of -Way Plantings 1. Front yards should be developed as open green spaces with a combination of large and small trees, evergreen & deciduous shrubs, earth berms, and/or ground covers. 2. Where it is necessary that portions of a parking lot front the adjacent right-of-way, a planting strip of 10 feet in width should be provided along the adjacent right-of-way. Within this strip a combination of large and small trees, evergreen & deciduous shrubs, earth berms or ground covers should be utilized to buffer the parking area. C. Parking Areas 1. Parking areas should incorporate raised landscaped islands in order to break up large expanses of pavement. 2. Large shade trees should be planted within and along the perimeter of parking areas in order to mitigate the negative environmental effects of heat and glare. 3. Landscaped berms located around parking areas to soften the noise, light and view of a parking area to its neighbors are highly encouraged. D. Building Plantings 1. Buildings should incorporate foundation plantings where appropriate. E. Stormwater Management 1. Above- ground stormwater management areas and facilities should be landscaped with plants adaptable to being temporarily inundated with water and designed as an asset to the overall development. F. Screening & Buffering 1. Where a development adjoins residential property, a 25 -foot wide buffer yard should be required. a. Within this buffer yard landscaping and screening should be provided and maintained to an average height of 15 feet. A combination of large and small trees, evergreen & deciduous shrubs, earth berms and/or ground covers should be utilized. Berming is encouraged to supplement screening. Average berm height should be 3-4 feet. Berm slopes should be no greater than 2:1. V. Lighting A. Details of lighting fixtures should be compatible with the existing residential character of the corridor. B. Path and landscape lighting are encouraged where appropriate. Lighting should be at a pedestrian scale through the use of light standards or placements 14 feet or less in height. . C. Parking lot lighting should be no more than 14' above grade, down -lit or shielded so as to direct light to the interior of the lot and not project glare onto the street or adjacent properties. Average intensity should not exceed the minimum required for safety. D. Any security lighting should be shielded and located so as to not cast light onto adjacent properties. In addition, the light source should not be visible from adjoining residential areas. VI. Signage A. The shared use of signs is encouraged for adjacent businesses. B. Signage should complement a buildings' architectural style. C. Signage placed on buildings should occupy less than 5% of the facade area. D. All freestanding signs should be monument type and meet the following criteria: 1. Monument signs should not exceed 5 feet in height or 7 feet in width; 2. Signs should be ground lit or top lit with shielded lamps placed so as to not cast light onto the path of traffic or on any adjacent road or property. E. Message length should be limited so that a passing motorist can read a sign within three -to -four seconds. No interchangeable boards should be permitted. F. Signs should be complemented, accented and enhanced by landscaping. The size of the landscaping plot should be one and one-half times the square footage of the sign, G. No portable or temporary signs should be permitted. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 25, 2017 ORDINANCE REZONING APPROXIMATELY .374 ACRE FROM R-1, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, TO C-1, OFFICE DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 3722 COLONIAL AVENUE, CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (TAX MAP NO. 077.18-03-31.00-0000) WHEREAS, in 2006, upon the application of the property owners to rezone approximately .374 acre of property at 3722 Colonial Avenue, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District (Tax Map No. 077.18-03-31.00-000) from R-1 to C-1, the application was denied by the Board; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 28, 2017, and the second reading and public hearing were held on April 25, 2017; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 4, 2017, and subsequently recommended approval of the rezoning application with the submitted and proposed proffered conditions; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: The proffered conditions on .374 acre of property at 3722 Colonial Avenue, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District (Tax Map No. 077.18-03-31.00-0000) are as follows: a. The property will be developed in substantial conformance with the Concept Plan prepared by Certified Landscape Architect Dan Chitwood dated April 10, 2017. Page 1 of 3 b. A 10' wide right-of-way planting buffer will be established to screen the parking area from Green Valley Drive. c. A 25' wide Type B planting buffer will be established along the rear property line. The planting buffer will incorporate the planting schedule, vegetation types and spacing as described within either option one or two of the Type B planting buffer standards. d. Any lighting installed around the parking area shall be bollard -type fixtures no more than 4' in height. e. Signage will be installed and maintained as follows: i. Any future freestanding sign shall be monument in style as defined by the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. The sign shall not exceed 24 square feet in face area, 5 feet in height and 7 feet in width. The sign shall be landscaped. The sign shall only be lit from the ground and shall not cause glare onto Colonial Avenue or adjacent properties. ii. Attached building signage shall not cover more than 5 percent of the building fagade area. iii. Neon signage shall not be allowed on the property. iv. Message or interchangeable sign boards shall not be allowed on the property. v. Temporary signage shall not be allowed on the property. f. Operating hours shall be limited to daily operation between 7:00 AM and 0110 W LVA I Page 2 of 3 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or part of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. Page 3 of 3