HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/8/2017 - RegularINVOCATION:
Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors
November 8, 2017
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES FLAG
Disclaimer:
"Any invocation that may be offered before the official start of the Board meeting
shall be the voluntary offering of a private citizen, to and for the benefit of the
Board. The views or beliefs expressed by the invocation speaker have not been
previously reviewed or approved by the Board and do not necessarily represent
the religious beliefs or views of the Board in part or as a whole. No member of
the community is required to attend or participate in the invocation and such
decision will have no impact on their right to actively participate in the business of
the Board."
Page 1 of 4
Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors
Agenda
November 8, 2017
Good afternoon and welcome to our meeting for November 8, 2017. Regular meetings
are held on the second and fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at
7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be
announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be
rebroadcast on Friday at 7:00 p.m. and on Sunday at 4:00 p.m. Board of Supervisors
meetings can also be viewed online through Roanoke County's website at
www.RoanokeCountyVA.gov. Our meetings are closed -captioned, so it is important for
everyone to speak directly into the microphones at the podium. Individuals who require
assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors
meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in
advance. Please turn all cell phones off or place on silent.
A. OPENING CEREMONIES
1. Roll Call
B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA
ITEMS
C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
1. Recognition of Sgt. Jeffrey A. Johnson for his selection as a 2017 recipient of the
International Association of Chiefs of Police "40 Under 40" Award (Howard B.
Hall, Chief of Police)
D. BRIEFINGS
1. Briefing to update the Board of Supervisors on the Mountain Valley Pipeline
project (Richard L. Caywod, Assistant County Administrator)
E. NEW BUSINESS
1. Resolution adopting a Legislative Program for the 2018 session of the Virginia
General Assembly and petitioning the General Assembly to favorably consider
the topics and issues addressed herein (Ruth Ellen Kuhnel, County Attorney)
Page 2 of 4
2. Resolution requesting that the President of the United States and the U.S.
Congress continue the Federal Historic Tax Credit Program (Thomas C. Gates,
County Administrator)
F. APPOINTMENTS
1. Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA)(appointed by District)
2. Budget and Fiscal Affairs (BFAC)(appointed by District)
3. Economic Development Authority (EDA)(appointed by District)
4. Library Board (appointed by District)
5. Social Services Advisory Board (appointed by District)
G. CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY
THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION
IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT
ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE
CONSIDERED SEPARATELY
1. Approval of minutes — September 26, 2017
2. Confirmation of appointment to the Clean Valley Council (At -Large)
3. Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County to Kathryn S. Crawley, Business Systems Analyst III, upon her retirement
after more than ten (10) years of service
H. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
I. REPORTS
1. Unappropriated, Board Contingency and Capital Reserves Report
2. Outstanding Debt Report
J. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
1. Al Bedrosian
2. Martha B. Hooker
3. P. Jason Peters
4. George G. Assaid
5. Joseph P. McNamara
Page 3 of 4
K. WORK SESSIONS
1. Work session to review with the Board of Supervisors the County's Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) including fiscal year 2019-2028 project requests
(Christopher R. Bever, Director, Management and Budget)
L. CLOSED MEETING, pursuant to the Code of Virginia as follows:
1. Section 2.2-3711.A.7. Consultation with legal counsel and briefings by staff
members or consultants pertaining to actual or probable litigation, where such
consultation or briefing in open meeting would adversely affect the negotiating or
litigating posture of the public body
M. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION
N. ADJOURNMENT
Page 4 of 4
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. C.1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
November 8, 2017
Recognition of Sgt. Jeffrey A. Johnson for his selection as a
2017 recipient of the International Association of Chiefs of
Police "40 Under 40" Award
SUBMITTED BY: Howard B. Hall
Chief of Police
APPROVED BY: Thomas C. Gates
County Administrator
BACKGROUND:
The International Association of Chiefs of Police "40 Under 40" award program is
designed to recognize 40 law enforcement professionals under the age of 40 from
around the world that demonstrate leadership and exemplify commitment to their
profession.
Sgt. Jeffrey A. Johnson was selected as a 2017 recipient of this prestigious award,
which he received at the IACP International Conference on October 23, 2017. Sgt.
Johnson was recognized for his consistent initiative and dedication to the mission of
keeping our community safe as well as his exceptional leadership skills. Some of his
notable accomplishments, in addition to his regular duties, include supervision of the
Police Department's Bicycle Response Team, coordination of social media activity,
implementation of the "Coffee with a Cop" program, and implementation of the
Domestic Violence Coordinator and lethality assessment tool.
Sgt. Johnson and the other winners were highlighted in the September 2017 issue of
"Police Chief" magazine.
Page 1 of 1
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. D.1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
ISSUE:
November 8, 2017
Briefing to update the Board of Supervisors on the Mountain
Valley Pipeline project
Richard Caywood
Assistant County Administrator
Thomas C. Gates
County Administrator
This time has been set aside to update the Board on the Mountain Valley Pipeline
project.
Page 1 of 1
°a"� ROANOKE COUNTY
2
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
5204 Bernard Drive, P.O. Box 29800
Thomas C. Gates Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 TEL: (540) 772-2004
County Administrator FAX: (540) 561-2884
August 22, 2017
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
Office of Wetlands & Stream Protection
P.O. Box 1105
Richmond, VA 23218
Attn: David Paylor, Director, DEQ
Dear Mr. Paylor,
The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) is currently considering Section 401 Water
Quality Certification (Certification) for issuance to Mountain Valley Pipeline LLC pursuant to Guidance
Memo No. GM17-2003. I am writing on behalf of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors requesting
that DEQ delay action on this certification, or deny it, until a thorough analysis of the potential upland
water resource impacts within Roanoke County can be made. Our request is made subsequent to the
County's recent development of new mapping intended to highlight the presence of potential upland
waters within the area of disturbance of the proposed MVP. This new information has been created by
the County's GIS Department. Mapping products illustrative of our GIS Department's recent mapping
efforts are enclosed herewith for your information.
Below we offer (1) a summary of our understanding of DEQ's decision to focus on upland waters in the
Certification process, (2) a description of the activities undertaken by Roanoke County to obtain new
information on the County's upland waters, (3) a description of the enclosed mapping products, and (4)
the rationale for our request that DEQ deny, or delay action on, Certification.
DEQ'S FOCUS ON UPLAND WATERS
As of this writing, a draft Certification document appears on the DEQ website at
http://www.deq.virginia.gov/Portals/0/DEQ/Water/Pipelines/MVPfinaldraft40lcert.pdf. This document
is titled, "CERTIFICATION No. 17-001, 401 Water Quality Certification Issued to Mountain Valley Pipeline,
LLC, 625 Liberty Avenue, Suite 1700, Pittsburgh, PA 15222." Page 4 of the draft Certification contains the
following language under section V, Conditions:
*Disturbance and removal of riparian buffers from Project -related upland land disturbing
activities that would occur within 50 feet of any perennial, intermittent, or ephemeral surface
waters shall be avoided where possible, and minimized to the maximum extent practicable if 50
feet is not possible.
•The construction limit of disturbance (LOD) in upland areas approaching waterbody and
wetland crossings shall be reduced from 125 feet to 75 feet and extended 50 feet from each
side of the stream or wetland crossing as an additional upland buffer.
•For any upland area approaching a waterbody or wetland crossing where this reduced LOD is
not possible, a written justification shall be provided to the Department for review and approval
prior to initiating land disturbing activity in that area.
•A 100 foot riparian buffer shall be maintained between any perennial, intermittent, or
ephemeral surface waters and all fueling, maintenance, parking and hazardous material storage
activities.
The County would like to offer our thanks for DEQ's intended focus, as revealed in the draft Certification
document, on the protection of areas adjacent to perennial, intermittent, and ephemeral surface waters
and wetlands in upland areas in the MVP construction zone. We are deeply appreciative of the stated
commitment on the part of DEQ to enforce the enhanced protections of these important upland waters,
as the MVP has been routed through an area of very steep, rocky terrain in Roanoke County long
recognized for the pristine quality and exquisite beauty of the waters issuing from underground onto
the rugged face of Poor Mountain in the form of springs, wetlands, and zero order, first order, perennial
and intermittent streams. In the furtherance of the interest we share with DEQ in protecting these
irreplaceable upland water bodies that form the headwaters of the South Fork of the Roanoke River,
Roanoke County's GIS Department has engaged in a mapping project utilizing a technology called Light
Detection and Ranging, or LiDAR. Below we describe the process whereby the County utilized LiDAR to
generate the maps that are enclosed herewith.
COUNTY'S NEW INFORMATION ON UPLAND WATERS
In 2015, subsequent to the formation of Roanoke County's Pipeline Advisory Committee (PAC),
members of the PAC visited pipeline construction sites in West Virginia, where they learned that
pipelines were being built through mountain springs with limited provisions for their protection. PAC
members reached out to DEQ's Groundwater Characterization Program, located in Harrisonburg, where,
since 2006, geologists have been developing a database of springs and wells in Virginia. Through
communications with the Groundwater Characterization Program, Committee members learned the
following:
• Our existing information on springs in Virginia is incomplete.
• Springs are headwaters for many streams. The streams are discharge channels for the springs.
Every mountain valley could have a spring at certain times of the year.
• Many tiny, unnamed headwater streams originating from springs do not appear on any
topographic map. Their location is unknown except by people who have walked the mountains.
• Many of these springs may be ephemeral, which means they originate higher on the mountain
when the water table is high, during wet seasons, and lower on the mountain when the water
table is low, during hot and dry seasons.
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
5204 Bernard Drive, P.O. Box 29800 • Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798
• In the interest of sediment control, any large-scale construction project should begin with a
proper inventory of groundwater features such as springs, sinkholes, and wells.
• Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) is a technology that can be used to provide preliminary
information on the location of springs and associated headwaters.
• Field surveys with GPS would be required to confirm the location of each spring and associated
headwater stream identified through LiDAR.
In 2015, PAC members mapped all the springs listed at that time in DEQ's spring database. The map
showed no springs on Poor Mountain, indicating a deficiency of information on the springs forming
headwaters of the South Fork of the Roanoke River on Poor Mountain, through which the MVP has been
routed.
DESCRIPTION OF ENCLOSED MAPPING PRODUCTS
In 2017, responding to inquiries from the PAC, Roanoke County GIS staff devoted dozens of hours to the
challenging task of learning how to use LiDAR technology to create useful and instructive maps
regarding potential springs and intermittent streams within Roanoke County. By July, county staff were
able to create a set of theoretical streams from LiDAR data and locate potential springs, as sinks, county-
wide. As reported by County GIS staff to members of the PAC, mapping with LiDAR identified
approximately 1,374 "potential" springs within the County's portion of the Limits of Disturbance of the
MVP. Roanoke County's GIS Analyst, Darren Jones, described the LiDAR map images as "a network of
lines which could be theoretical streams based on quite a few high level algorithms which calculate the
flow of direction and flow accumulation from the digital elevation model (DEM). What they do is
calculate the potential of water flow, starting at the highest elevation available, and following the
topography of the land, to points where each line joins with others, thus generating a potential network
of streams. The network would have to be further processed, based on the acreage value of a final
product."
Please see enclosed maps created by Darren Jones utilizing LiDAR. We discuss the significance of the
LiDAR generated information below.
RATIONALE FOR REQUEST THAT DEQ DELAY OR DENY CERTIFICATION
The network of potential springs and streams as illustrated on the enclosed maps brings up a number of
troubling issues associated with the current plans on the part of DEQ to certify the MVP. We note that,
as illustrated on the enclosed LiDAR maps, the density of potential springs and streams is so high that,
even if only a small percentage of these "potential" water bodies is found through field reconnaissance
to actually exist, it would be impossible to build the MVP through the current alignment without
impacting them. Information on the location of springs and associated headwaters on Poor Mountain as
generated by LiDAR and subsequent field reconnaissance would render the "Conditions" appearing on
page 4 of DEQ's draft CERTIFICATION No. 17-001, as discussed above, virtually impossible to enforce,
due to the density of springs and headwaters. It is possible, if not likely, that there would be insufficient
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
5204 Bernard Drive, P.O. Box 29800 • Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798
space within the MVP corridor to avoid impacting these upland waters, DEQ's "Conditions"
notwithstanding. Since neither DEQ nor MVP has any idea how many springs, i.e., upland waters, exist
on Poor Mountain in Roanoke County, DEQ's "Conditions" requiring the avoidance and protection of
upland waters are, unfortunately, not very meaningful, unless and until the springs and headwaters are
mapped with LiDAR and confirmed through field reconnaissance.
We also understand that "state waters" under Virginia law includes all waters above and below the
ground. Thus Virginia's water quality standards apply to both groundwater and surface water. This
substantiates our case for a thoroughgoing assessment of the MVP's impacts to springs and associated
headwaters, as these bodies represent the point at which our pristine groundwater becomes surface
water.
Absent a comprehensive effort at mapping and field reconnaissance of the springs and headwaters
potentially impacted by the MVP in Roanoke County and elsewhere in the MVP corridor, it would appear
to the County that the DEQ is not in a position to issue the Certification for the MVP. Under these
circumstances, the County requests that DEQ deny, or delay action on, Certification.
Thank you for your attention to the matters discussed in this letter. We look forward to discussing them
with you at your earliest convenience. Please do not hesitate to call at me 540/772-2004.
Regards,
AThoas C. Gates
Roanoke County Administrator
Cc: Virginia Department of Health
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
5204 Bernard Drive, P.O. Box 29800 • Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. E.1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBMITTED BY:
November 8, 2017
Resolution adopting a Legislative Program for the 2018
session of the Virginia General Assembly and petitioning the
General Assembly to favorably consider the topics and
issues addressed herein
Ruth Ellen Kuhnel
County Attorney
APPROVED BY: Thomas C. Gates
County Administrator
ISSUE:
Roanoke County Board and staff have identified legislative issues of local and statewide
concern to be considered by the 2018 session of the Virginia General Assembly. The
Board will consider and pass a resolution adopting a formal Legislative Agenda to be a
guiding document for the upcoming session.
BACKGROUND:
Each year the Board of Supervisors adopts a
local state legislators advocate the County's
Session.
DISCUSSION:
resolution formally requesting that the
interests during the General Assembly
The Board held a formal work session on October 10, 2017, guided by its legislative
liaison representatives, Eldon James and Sue Rowland. The legislative liaisons
presented possible issues which may arise in this year's Session upon which Roanoke
County desires to be heard. Many issues are addressed year after year, such as
transportation and taxing authority, while others such as the rising impacts of opioid
abuse are new to local governments' conversations with the members of the General
Assembly.
Page 1 of 2
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact is generated by this action.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the proposed resolution.
Page 2 of 2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 8, 2017
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM FOR THE 2018
SESSION OF THE VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY AND PETITIONING
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO FAVORABLY CONSIDER THE TOPICS
AND ISSUES ADDRESSED HEREIN
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has identified
major legislative issues of statewide concern to be considered by the 2018 session of the
Virginia General Assembly; and
WHEREAS, the Board adopts this resolution as its Legislative Program for the
2018 session of the Virginia General Assembly.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, that the following legislative initiatives are submitted for its legislative
program for the 2018 session of the Virginia General Assembly for its favorable
consideration and adoption.
(1) Transportation.
a. The County continues to be concerned about funding for our public
highways and roadways, and respectfully requests continued efforts on:
• Widening and improving safety on 1-81 between Exit 118 and Exit
150;
• Improvements to State Route 419 between U.S. 220 and 1-81,
particularly improvements that implement the draft 419 Town Center
Plan;
Page 1 of 6
• Improvements to State Route 460 with emphasis on increased
capacity between 1-581 and Alternate 220;
• Safety improvements to U.S. 220 between State Route 419 and
Rocky Mount;
• Funding for construction of 1-73;
• The County supports a robust revenue sharing program with
adequate funding to encourage localities to target and improve its
critical roadways.
b. Smart Scale
• While the General Assembly through HB 2313 (2013) addressed
transportation needs throughout the Commonwealth ("Smart
Scale"), the County also urges a close and ongoing monitoring and
evaluation of the Smart Scale model to ensure that local needs are
met.
• The County urges restored funding for the Six -Year Secondary
Road Plan to fill in the gap for general roadways to assist local
governments in assuring needed secondary roads to best serve the
localities unique needs.
• Mandate that Total Cost be used in Smart Scale benefit/cost
calculations instead of Smart Scale Request Cost
(2) Telecommunications.
a. Broadband
Page 2 of 6
• The County strongly supports efforts to expand broadband
capabilities in underserved and rural areas including protecting and
enhancing local authority to deploy broadband or partner with others,
public or private, to adequately serve unserved and underserved
areas.
• Efforts to enhance the deployments of 5G technology must include
expansion of high-speed service to rural areas.
b. Local land use and wireless
• Retain local decision making and authority for siting of
telecommunications facilities, including small cell.
• Retain local cost recovery fees to adequately review technical
industry applications.
(2) Opioids.
• The County supports all efforts, both state and federal, to support
solutions to the opioid crisis facing our citizens.
(3) Children's Services Act.
• The County supports monitoring the implementation of policies by the
State Executive Council that provide guidelines for public participation
in its process of developing and adopting policy. The County supports
equitable cost-sharing between the state and localities for the costs
involved in the placements of children in residential treatment facilities
for non -educational reasons. The County opposes proposals to limit
state participation in funding services for children and youth who are
Page 3 of 6
mandated to be provided with special education and foster care
services.
(4) Advertising -Public Notices
• The advent of social media and other electronic forms of communication
has fundamentally reshaped the means for disseminating information to
the public.
• The County supports legislation that would grant localities greater
flexibility to meet certain legal notice requirements including the
authority to advertise legal notices on local radio, television or on the
locality's website, in lieu of the newspaper advertisement requirement.
(5) Law Enforcement and Mental Health
• The County strongly supports a sustained focus by the state on
Virginia's mental health services system to ensure, through
evaluation and investment, that appropriate and effective outpatient
and in-patient services are available across the Commonwealth.
• The County encourages reforms that provide for alternative
placement for local jail inmates with serious mental health issues
which should not be left to be addressed by jail personnel.
(6) Local Retention of Revenue for Internet based services
• In January 2017, the Board adopted a resolution to support federal
legislation to collect and remit sales taxes structured on a system of
collection based upon the purchaser's location.
Page 4 of 6
• The County has a duty to protect its local retailers by leveling the
playing field with Internet competitors most notably in the lodging or
ride -sharing services.
• If the Commonwealth should take action to regulate private
enterprises employing a business model that emphasizes the use of
the Internet to provide retail or facilitate lodging or ride -sharing
services, then local governments should be included in the decision
making.
• To include local government in the process ensures safety, reliability
and access for consumers, providers and the public.
• Local governments should regulate the businesses equally whether
they are traditional, electronic, Internet -based, virtual or otherwise.
(7) State and Local Fiscal Relationship
• As the Commonwealth and the Federal governments add new
programs, modify existing program guidelines and promulgate
complex regulations and higher standards for local governments to
implement, then portions of funding inevitably revert to a local
burden, i.e. Stormwater regulations.
• Local general fund revenue and special funds should not be
confiscated or re -directed to the state treasury. (i.e., proposed short
term rental taxing)
• Specific local revenue authority should not be upended or restricted
without granting alternative revenue sources, including Business,
Page 5 of 6
Professional, and Occupational Licenses tax and Machinery and
Tool tax discussion.
• The County requests that local governments be included in study
commissions or other bodies formed to review local revenue
authority or governance.
Page 6 of 6
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. E.2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
ISSUE:
November 8, 2017
Resolution requesting that the President of the United States
and the U.S. Congress continue the Federal Historic Tax
Credit Program
Jill Loope
Director of Economic Development
Thomas C. Gates
County Administrator
The recently released House Tax Reform Bill eliminates the federal Historic Tax Credit
Program. The elimination of the HTC program threatens a critical incentive needed to
revitalize historic properties, attract private capital investment and preserve historic
structures.
BACKGROUND:
The federal HTC is a 30 year old program that encourages historic preservation,
stimulates job growth and attracts private capital for the revitalization of historic assets.
The program has created over 2.4 million jobs, rehabilitated more than 42,000 buildings,
and leveraged $131.8 billion in private investment.
Historic tax credits have facilitated significant redevelopment projects in communities,
bringing more than $29 billion in federal tax revenues. The federal HTC program served
as a valuable incentive to attract new private investment in Roanoke County for the
Roland E. Cook and William Byrd school redevelopment projects.
DISCUSSION:
There is no discussion regarding this agenda item.
Page 1 of 2
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact regarding this agenda item.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution.
Page 2 of 2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 8, 2017
RESOLUTION REQUESTING THAT THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED
STATES AND THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS CONTINUE THE
FEDERAL HISTORIC TAX CREDIT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the federal Historic Tax Credit program (HTC) as we know it today
was put in place by Congress and the Reagan Administration to attract capital to historic
rehabilitation projects that help stimulate local economies; and
WHEREAS, since the inception of the HTC, it has created over 2.4 million jobs,
rehabilitated more than 42,000 buildings, and leveraged $131.8 billion in private
investment; and
WHEREAS, recognizing the importance of this successful federal economic
development program, more than 35 states have enacted complementary state historic
tax credit programs to help revitalize the commercial downtowns of their cities and Main
Street communities; and
WHEREAS, federal HTC projects have a 99 percent success rate, leverage four
private dollars for every dollar of federal support, and are catalytic, building
neighborhood confidence and generating follow-on projects for blocks around; and
WHEREAS, over the life of this program, the HTC has generated $29.8 billion in
federal tax revenues compared to $25.2 billion in credits allocated—more than paying
for itself; and
WHEREAS, the federal HTC program, combined with the Virginia Historic Tax
Credit program is a powerful tool that has led to the development of such vacant and
blighted buildings in Roanoke County such as the former Roland E. Cook School
building and the former William Byrd High School. Because of these programs, these
buildings were returned to a productive reuse and taxable status.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County in due regular and legal session convened, that the Roanoke County Board of
Supervisors supports the federal Historic Tax Credit program and urges the President of
the United States and the United States Congress to continue the federal Historic Tax
Credit program.
FURTHER, The Board of Supervisors directs the Clerk to provide attested copies
of this resolution to The Honorable Paul Ryan, Speaker of the United States House of
Representatives, The Honorable Bob Goodlatte, Chairman of the House Judiciary
Committee, The Honorable Mitch McConnell, Senate Majority Leader of the United
States Senate, The Honorable Mark Warner, United States Senator, and The Honorable
Tim Kaine, United States Senator.
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. F.1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
ISSUE:
All open appointments
BACKGROUND:
November 8, 2017
Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards
Deborah C. Jacks
Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
Thomas C. Gates
County Administrator
1. Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA)(appointed by District)
The following five-year term expired on June 30, 2017:
a) Carlton W. Wright, representing the Hollins Magisterial District is eligible
for reappointment
2. Budget and Fiscal Affairs Committee (BFAC) (appointed by District)
The following District appointments remain open:
Hollins Magisterial District
Cave Spring Magisterial District
Vinton Magisterial District
3. Economic Development Authority (EDA) (appointed by District)
Billy H. Branch, representing the Cave Spring Magisterial District has resigned. His
four-year unexpired term ends September 26, 2017
Page 1 of 2
The following four-year term expired on September 26, 2015:
a) Greg Apostolou, representing the Hollins Magisterial District is eligible for
reappointment
The following four-year term expired on September 26, 2017:
a) Steve Anderson, representing the Cave Spring Magisterial District is
eligible for reappointment
b) Leon McGhee, representing the Vinton Magisterial District is eligible for
reappointment
c) Steve Musselwhite, representing the Vinton Magisterial District is eligible
for reappointment
4. Library Board (appointed by District)
The following four-year term expired on December 31, 2016:
a) Heather Lawrence, representing the Vinton Magisterial District
5. Social Services Advisory Board (appointed by District)
The following four-year term expired on July 31, 2017:
a) Mike Bailey, representing the Hollins Magisterial District
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
There is no staff recommendation associated with this agenda item.
Page 2 of 2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2017
RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET
FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE
DESIGNATED AS ITEM g- CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for November 8,
2017, designated as Item G - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred
in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 3
inclusive, as follows:
1. Approval of minutes — September 26, 2017
2. Confirmation of appointment to the Clean Valley Council
3. Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County to Kathryn S. Crawley, Business Systems Analyst III, upon her
retirement after more than ten (10) years of service
Page 1 of 1
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. G.2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
ISSUE:
November 8, 2017
Confirmation of appointment to the Clean Valley Council (At -
Large)
Deborah C. Jacks
Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
Thomas C. Gates
County Administrator
Confirmation of appointment
BACKGROUND:
The Board of Supervisors has recommended the reappointment of Theresa Passeretti
as Board Liaison for an additional two-year appointment to expire June 30, 2019.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends confirmation of this appointment.
Page 1 of 1
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. G.3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
ISSUE:
November 8, 2017
Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County to Kathryn S. Crawley,
Business Systems Analyst III, upon her retirement after more
than ten (10) years of service
Deborah C. Jacks
Chief Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
Thomas C. Gates
County Administrator
Recognition of the retirement of Kathryn S. Crawley
BACKGROUND:
Kathryn S. Crawley, Business Systems Analyst III, retired on November 1, 2017, after
more than ten (10) years of service with Roanoke County.
Ms. Crawley is unable to attend today's meeting and her quilt and resolution will be
mailed to her home.
DISCUSSION:
There is no discussion associated with this agenda item.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution.
Page 1 of 1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 8, 2017
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO KATHRYN S. CRAWLEY,
BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST III, UPON HER RETIREMENT AFTER
MORE THAN TEN (10) YEARS OF SERVICE
WHEREAS, Ms. Crawley was employed by Roanoke County on July 23, 2007 on a
full-time basis; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Crawley will retire on November 1, 2017, after ten (10) years and
three (3) months of devoted, faithful and expert service to Roanoke County; and
WHEREAS, during Ms. Crawley's tenure with the Information Technology
Department, she has served with professionalism and dedication in providing services to
the citizens of Roanoke County;
WHEREAS, throughout Ms. Crawley's career with Roanoke County on the
Communications and Information Technology Application Services team, she provided
excellent support and development for Tyler Munis Tax, Cashiering, Animal License,
Citizen Self Service, Content Management and Real Estate and Personal Property billing.
She devoted many hours to conversion and testing for the HP to Munis migration and
subsequent upgrades, and challenging ownerand billing data mismatches and issues. She
performed her work with dedication, humor and focus, and provided expertise to newer co-
workers on the Tyler environment. Her support of system users in the Commissioner of
Revenue, Clerk of Court, Finance and Roanoke and Town of Vinton Treasurer's offices
was valued, as was her support of the team in CommlT. She was a trusted resource for
working through complex vendor issues and business process changes. She will be missed
by all of her team and co-workers; and
Page 1 of 2
WHEREAS, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens
of Roanoke County to KATHRYN S. CRAWLEY for more than ten years of capable, loyal
and dedicated service to Roanoke County; and
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy and
productive retirement.
Page 2 of 2
Q)
.�d
0
c
0
�
0
�
�
�
0
U
Q)
�
Q)
Q)
w
3
.
v
�
c
m
�
�
Q)
to
c
�
0
U
�
0
m
�
u
c
m
2
-0
Q)
m
CL
0
CL
CL
m
c
�
00
0
N
P�
0
J_
2
�
MA
LL
rq
rq
cm
cm
o
M
.
u
L3
00
0
.
7
Ln
o
00
m
cr
o
%
r
�
k
7
2 t
/
Ln
§
I
m 2
u
»
»
cm
cm
c
.
2
» > k
k
2
2
q
%
cm
m
cn
Ln
%
00
0 M
m
CL2
CL
c
k
\
_
/
\
u
%
+
/
�
\
/
/
ƒ
)
\
2
/
§
u
n
0
/
o
CLrq
k
\
0
\
k
cm
/
/ /
rq
/
$
N
%
2
q
\
\
c
\
\
\
2
k
QE
/
k
E
®
$
Li
%
$
<
»
o
q
\
2
\
\
z
\
\
\
&
a
@
&
�
e
@
c
\
ca
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
CHANGES IN OUTSTANDING DEBT
Changes in outstanding debt for the fiscal year to date were as follows:
Unaudited
Outstanding Outstanding
June 30, 2017 Additions Deletions November 8, 2017
General Obligation Bonds $ 3,640,935 $ - $ 3,640,935
VPSA School Bonds 86,990,706 8,107,624 78,883,082
Lease Revenue Bonds 78,410,705 - 3,005,000 75,405,705
$ 169,042,346 $ - $ 11,112,624 - $ 157,929,722
Submitted By
Approved By
Rebecca E. Owens
Director of Finance
Thomas C. Gates
County Administrator
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. K.1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
ISSUE:
November 8, 2017
Work session to review with the Board of Supervisors the
County's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) including fiscal
year 2019-2028 project requests
Christopher R. Bever
Director of Management and Budget
Thomas C. Gates
County Administrator
Provide the Board of Supervisors an overview of the County's Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) including fiscal year 2019-2028 project requests.
BACKGROUND:
As part of the County's budget process, the County's ten-year Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) is reviewed annually. This presentation provides an overview of the
upcoming fiscal year 2019-2028 CIP budget development process.
DISCUSSION:
County staff will review the attached PowerPoint presentation at the work session. The
attached presentation provides information on recently completed and active capital
projects, fiscal year 2019-2028 project requests, vehicle and equipment replacement,
CIP funding sources, and debt information. County staff will be working through mid-
January to prepare the County Administrator's Proposed Fiscal Year 2019-2028 CIP for
presentation to the Board of Supervisors on January 23, 2018.
Page 1 of 2
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with the receipt of the attached presentation. Any
decisions regarding the Capital Improvement Program will be prioritized and presented
as part of the County Administrator's Proposed Fiscal Year 2019-2028 CIP, with Board
of Supervisors approval of the CIP scheduled for May 22, 2018.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors receive information regarding the
County's Capital Improvement Program.
Page 2 of 2
c
0
Ln
0
0
.i
0
0
m
0
00
E
0
z
a--+
c
0 w
E
V a--+
0 •o E
0
V _
W
a co
a)U
E
� N
O
oN'U'-j
o
p O a
N �
C)
aA �
CO ca
O V ate-+
0 U
O
o o
O
O U
c
•O
ca
E
0
C:
h.4Fe"
Ln
V
O
0
Ln
x
a�
Q
a
H
L
H
•L
Q
L
m
m
a
as a O
a Z;cn
CL O
a �axo m
Oma �
V
dA
O dA
i O O +�+
m a_ � a°1a
u V N 3
O CL O m
O O
a
N
a� O
� � m
O as m
rL a a)
o r
a a)
O
a
�
U
V
�
i
C
Qa
a
W
� �
N
O
�
tOif
m
Q
O
0
O
Q
O
a)
a
U
G1
i O
i
C
Qa
a
W
� �
O
of
dA
m
O
u
O
N
O
a)
a
r -I
0
SOC
G1
4 �O
O
O
O
a
CL
c
U
G1
i O
i
C
Qa
a
W
� �
O
0 O
O
O
O
w f'C
C
N
4 �O
O
O
O
M
WCL
cr
w�a
E
O
U
U
C
Qa
a
W
V
Ors
E
E
O
U
fa
fa
�
O
�
U
�
0
O
v
O
�
co
by
�--�
L
O
C:
E
—
},
C
O
fa
}+
C:
O
I..V
U
�
.O
O
_
T[
r
w UAJ
O
V) 4-1 L-
V .�
C >.
O v }'
a
c E
°' n E
E ° o
u
U, o C
Q)> +,
00
V)V +V)
4� L ." 00
� -0 E 0
Q • � OE w
O 0
C: Q) u
° ,> > to
W C:
W 4-00 V
> � � '� ago �
C./ I f . -
O — v
C:ro ro C: +.a
u
ca _0
U O O +� 4-
LL Q m � O
00 ago �'0 >% w ° a�
N .� � v Ul
Q =3 C:
N'—
O .R � � a) — o a�
LU � C
0%,o a
U ,� ca � >
U
N
�
r*-,
�
Mo
.
N
O
0
N0
O
v
U
LL.
�>
0
00
N
-0
O
7C)
N
�
c
t0
00
O
O
0
N
�
N
n
„
cn
r*-,
Mo
r*-,
Ln
Mo
.
N
O
0
N0
O
v
�>
0
3
N
a)
C-
00
00
O
c
t0
00
O
�
00
rl
3i
N
M
rl
cn
N
2
O
O
E
O
Q
E
O
�
o
LA
o
�
��
°
o
E
=
CLO
E�
U
—
i z
a--)
i z
a --r
a
ca
U
U
o
M
�U
a
o
.
Ln
+>.+
.
NtO
.�o
v
�>
0
3
N
r
00
'�
Ol
_
.;
Ln
E
GJ
3i
M
O
cn
2
O
U
�
o
M
�U
a
4
tn
cc
0
0
s
U
x
w
o
.
Ln
�
N
�>
GJ
00
_
LA
cncn
4
tn
cc
0
0
s
U
x
w
0
LO
IL
U
N
N
F4
o
N
^d
-I-
e i
ilY
K!}
i.F1-
•
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
Ln
OLn
OLn
OLn
b
O
O
O
�
m
O
'
O
O
N
r -I
O
fyi
N
N
N
Q
m
N
co
O
O
U
}'
Q
U
.�
O
�
N
0
O
U
O
�
C6
4J
+j
_0
a--+
0
O
DC
N
t
p
I
O
U
+-+
O
C
cn
U
Q
�
O
O
_
+j
ca
N
Ln
bn
(z
Lu
_0Q
L
OO
0
O
U
O
ca
�
ate'
U
O
J
m
w
a)
O
ca
O
ca
0
i
O
O
U
O
u
>
�
C0
0)
I
p
LL J
u
0
0
Q
a
:3
-
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
O
O
O
O
Otxo
txo
>
>
>
>
Q
Q
>
—
—
—
—
U
U
is b
n �
Yh Y./r
A
LMM,
O b b
��o�m�° m mm ~
6 o ri 6 6 6 6 0 6
lij- lij- lij- lij- lij- lij- iii- lij-
N
E
N
U
m
Q
N
N
Ln
N
a_
on
O
Q
E E E
El
At
N
Ciel
W
07
W
4-J
^
I..L
N
N
U
a
U
cr
�
N
0
N
-J
V /1
I
U
•
0�
�N
D,
,-
O b b
��o�m�° m mm ~
6 o ri 6 6 6 6 0 6
lij- lij- lij- lij- lij- lij- iii- lij-
N
E
N
U
m
Q
N
N
Ln
N
a_
on
O
Q
E E E
El
At
N
v
o
C�
v a
Ln
•
m
Ll)
rn
r1
Ul)
lD
Ul)
r1
m
r1
Ul)
N
LCA
O
O
O
O
O
(5
�
O
O
O
>
O
U
cc
C6
a_
0-
+j +j
O
J
�
O
O
v I
cz
_0
C:a_
n
,
W
i
E
Q
O
0
_0
O07
fB
�
C1A
%I1
Em
Q
0
Q
u
-se
i
C6
W
0)
a--+
u
N
O
�
cn
O
DC
O
(n
m
=a--+
m
+j
(6
Q
(n
C6
i
(n
U
E
N
+jLL
CO
O
m
U
u
c)
>
—0
�
�N
X
w
�
_
°'
L�
O
i..�
m
U
U
w
w
w
w
w
•
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
O
N
m
%J}
:E
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
C7
Ln
O
Ln
O
Ln
U
d
M
N
U
N
rl
r -I
ih
iJ�
Ili
O
I�
O
Ili
Ili
O
O
O
I�
N
U)
m
U)
lD
O
lD
Ol
N
N
m
ui
1-1
r -I
r�
N
O
O
r4
O
i./)-
i./)-
i./)-
r -I
i./)-
i./)-
i./)-
i./)-
i./)-
4j)-
4j) -
'9
ca
C1A
O
O
U
c6
+j
CC:
G
c6
Q
ca
O
0)
U
ca
Q
DC
O
+j
U
Ln
ca
-9
At
O
ca
0-
D D
N
E
0)
+j
N
c6
ca
U
O
21-1
ca
ca
ate-+
U
0)
W
Q
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
E
3
2
0o
v
o
o
m
0
Ln
O
Ln
p
I
• G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
Om
00
•
L n
rl
r-
�
�
l6
O
O
O
lfl
N
O
rl
O
J
6
O
O
Q
O
U
_O
C6
(1)
Q
>
E
0
O
E
�
c
U
m
c
c
O
+j
C:
O
Ln
_0
C
O
�
�
O
0
O
E
D
U
ca
O
E
C1A
+j
Lu
(\IL J)
—
j
i
U
Q
J
I
�C
ca
U
J
C6
U
-
O
L�
O
+�
O
00
v
-0
�
Lu
•
u
U
o-
i
o
.GJ
�N
1
O
m
cn
U
c�
ca
O
W�
' )
�I
' O
LU Cc
�
�
N
i
C:
C6
O
Q
�,J J`,
cc
U
Lu
O
O
O
O
�N
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
O
O
O
O
DC
06
DC
06
DC
06
DC
06
1 1
rtz
rtz
rtz
rtz
0
C) Ln o
4j).
V}
0
C)
M
0
Ln
N
Q
v
N
d
vi
rl
o
m
o
0
0
0
O
a�
-_
O
>
�U
3
Q
LcL
E
V)
n 1
VJ
X
O
O
O
t�lp
07
E
O
O
U
n ,
+j
i
ate-+
OO
Ln
U
U
O
U
0
O
U
Q)
U
00
p�
0
a-
>
ro
�N
0w
4�
O
a
=
�
z
c�
N
0
O
0
O
0
o
OU
U
U
CN
co
co
co
m
m
m
0
C) Ln o
4j).
V}
N
0
0
U
N
cn
U
�
07
U
o00
Ur,
a
kl__z0
c
0
�J
0
O
CL
O
m
c
Ca
bA
E c:
w
>
O
z E
�_0
O
C m
• - -
-0 O
O
N �
'— V
m Ln
O
O
4-J RZI-
ca �
.� E
+�>
c: O
Ae ---v
tw
.C:
Ln
ca
U
U
0
a�
0
U
0
0
ca
O —
� O
O
� V
Ln
m -C
-0 tw
C
-a
ca �
m
V E
O '–
C:
V Ln
C:'–
C: • O
—
tw +-o
}' O
X
E
0
V C:
O
E
_0
— Q
U >,
C:
OO
+j U
.c
-0
O c�
�0
O
O
V D_
C O
OU
a--+ 00
_0 r -I
a) 0
c6 N
C
' N
�V
�
c� c�
U ca
V
O o
O +J
V
_ � A
N
D
cn
r -I
r -I
l0
LLA
Vlj�
T t
3 V O
V Lm
C "a eq
Z qj,).
3
LL
MV
Ln
Q�
W
C
o�
C
�
o
�U
�3
LL
U
o�
O
a..,
0
a>
�O
cn
r -I
r -I
l0
LLA
Vlj�
T t
3 V O
V Lm
C "a eq
Z qj,).
3
LL
MV
Ln
Q�
W
C
\
C
cn
r -I
r -I
l0
LLA
Vlj�
T t
3 V O
V Lm
C "a eq
Z qj,).
3
LL
MV
LL
N
ca
U
N
LL
LL
�V�
m
N
>
a�
C6
J
tZ0 N
O _0O U >'
U � U -04-CID J
n � n (1)
Ln
w
W
C
\
C
Li
N
LL
U
ca
O
a..,
0
uE
N
-0.�
E0
LL
U
Q
Q
U_
.E
O
LL
i
0
Ln
LU
LL
N
ca
U
N
LL
LL
�V�
m
N
>
a�
C6
J
tZ0 N
O _0O U >'
U � U -04-CID J
n � n (1)
c
�
�.O
o
Ch
U
N
N
0
O
LL O
N
Q�
N
-
p
O�
Q�
LO
�
N
f 1
rl
a,
N
Q
0
N
hA
m
m
U
4]
d
f6
LO
m
4-
N
(
0
D
m
6
N
m
Ln
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lf7 O Lq O Uf O Ln O
M M N N ri ri O O
C
Q]
E
C
N
0
119
m
m
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I.
N
N
1.0C)
N
Lr)
N
O
N
O E
N IJ
M •
N 1
O
N
v
y N 0
LL O
N
v
0
N s
O
N
O
O
N
} IT
CD
O
N
00
O
N
} N
LL O
N
ri
LL O
N
O
LL O
N
m
G�
o
Ch
}�
LL O
r
LL O
N
cn
N
rn
LO
00
N=
r
}
LL
LL O
ih
N
LnN
} N
LL O
j
N
ep
�lt
rq
LL O
ih
N
O
M
N
} N
LL O
N
ri
LL O
N
O
LL O
N
m
G�
o
}�
LL O
vNi
N
00
N=
}
LL
N
O Ll O Lf7 O 4LJR
!} i%} 4j). i!i :!k
00 N r -I N r -I N O
N r4 r4 O O N O
E
2
2
2
2
2
2
G
'
w
l0
Ln
::1-
(.0
r -I
Ln
Ol
N
r -I
L n
r -I
rl
r -I
O
�
cc
cc
cc
4
cn
O
N
r -I
0�0
T-4
W
W
U
o
N
m
L
Ln
4�
ry
o
LnLn
r-4
Ln
co
CD
M
r4
r4
o
o
M
ciE
4�
D-
D
C)7
N
WLL
N
N
>-w
LL
>
C5to
n l
LL
co
'V
._
W
U
N
�
H
O
c0
LL c%
w
U �,
V
H
Mfn
._
0
L.V
E
M
CA
•i
la
3
M
a-+
V
�
0
o
�
°Cca
a, p
0� Oy
m
V
.r.
O
L.V
E
M
i
aw
N
•i
H
3
M
aw
M
V
m
a
iii
511
M
E
0
O
0
00
O
-0
ca
p
O
�1
O
U
N
O
Q
N
C6
N
C6
a,-+
O
+�
u
p
+_+
ca
N
p
O
)
Q
_0
a -J
L
E
N
C6
4-J
+-+
,�
N
ca
O
v
N
N
v
ate-+
N
O
L
–0
U
O
U
O
Q
4-
Q
cn
•�
cJ
O
N
O
U
p
Q
O
v
•�
bD
=3
u
O
p
N
Ln
O
J
O
O
.4 -Ji
O
cn
O
N
>
'L
U
•�
f6
a--+
a --+U
(f)—
—
m
N
U
—
U
•L
0
U
},
(f)
U
N
-
4-
cn
vi
N
U
ru
O
v
.�
E
0
0
a
La.
0
V
La.
V
0
0
a�
N
5
0
-0
ca
p
U
O
O
Ov
E
O
aA�
O
O
U
U
N
m
O
OOU
U
pU
N
U
N
>
o
=3 Na"'
��
�
i
���
CSA
N
U
f6
—CL
i
-0
.�
0
O
i
m
a i
a
cc
T3 4,
a
j O
v
iE
I
9
0
I
c
►w
5
Ln b
ru
'O
4.j N
ru
Ln
O O
N O
.Ln -tZ a
O �
O O
a k O
� � U
4-1
Ln V�
O �
4-1
� s O
v_ N
Ln
In
�aLn
kn
Okn
� a
v k a
U �
N
ate►, U
O ru
i u
N 4-1
4-1
ru
o�
o�
a►+ a►+
r�
ac
O
a�7C)
U
�Q
N
N
Q
U�
U
p
O
U
�Q
N
U
p
U
O
-er
r i
m
LM
m
E
Lnw
N
w
r
I� r -I r -I M Ln W M N O 141: -!
� O
d
E
aJ
cn aJ
O
� aJ f6
Ln 7C)
bn
bn LU
'U
Q `� L
mo E
Oro 4-J
p� O >'
cr6 J _0 C:O
I..L U }+
},N N aJ + �O O
bn M N U N 4-J
s Ln
—L +-+ cn
J a, Q U ° — Q
.� cUn - _0 E
U 7C)�'co U Q N
w o > w Co o N
ro m
i — � ° Q
� oc aJ ii
'� w O -0 U � 4-
aJoc cn
U O +_'
U C:° ° W U
— E N ca
Q ° 4-
cn 2 cn U °
L7 oc
O
O 7C) U U U
� �
N '''� aJaJ aJ aJ aJ
aJ aJ W U U U U U
aJ }—J 4-J a—J aJ aJ aJ aJ aJ
/U U r f- f- E
!1 • — —
—7 i i i i i
UN
00
U
C:
0
—
ca
J
ro
rn
0
0
�
N
O
Q
.N
O
N
N
�
n
0
L
L�
uU
_
N
m
N
`n
�
O
•�
U
W
0
Q
>-N
O
m
+-j
c6
4--+ b.0
U
V/
N
•�
cn
N -0
(/)
C6
•E
0 m
3
U
� m
0
m—
ca
0
U
m
ca
Q
_O
�_
_O
a-
�
U
O
U
U
p
U
NO
U cn
U
O
Q
O
-0
Q
O
-0O
C:
O
N
N
U
^
>
+_+
_0
U
N
N
O
N
O
N
_0
m
D—
u
>
O
cn
O
O
0
O
0
Ln
Q
N
'N
'N
N U
W
cOL
i
l�A
u
0
0—
>
O
m
N
Q
O
N
•U
N
M
•U L
O
C6
_0
-0
_0
— +-+
- N
O
U
Ou
o
:3
:3:3:
a)
00
O�
4-0
O
O
O
r.4
O
O
r14
N
00
O
00
O
�
00
O
N
U
M
N
>
O
ON
N
N
ca
•�
N
•�
00
N
1 1
0
0
rrt
QJ
c
c
N
t
CC
C
U
N
N^`
W
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2017
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN
CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a
closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance
with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the
Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was
conducted in conformity with Virginia law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each member's knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements
by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution
applies; and
2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the
closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia.
Page 1 of 1