HomeMy WebLinkAbout6/11/1991 - Regular
June 11, 1991
440
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Center
3738 Brambleton Avenue S. w.
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
June 11, 1991
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration
Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the first regularly
scheduled meeting of the month of June, 1991.
IN RE:
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman McGraw called the meeting to order at 3:06 p.m. The
roll call was taken.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chairman steven A. McGraw, Supervisors Lee B.
Eddy, Bob L. Johnson, Richard W. Robers
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Vice Chairman Harry C. Nickens (arrived at 3:10
p.m. )
STAFF PRESENT:
Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M.
Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk
to the Board; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County
Administrator, John M. Chambliss, Assistant
County Administrator, Don M. Myers, Assistant
County Administrator,
IN RE:
OPENING CEREMONIES
The invocation was given by the Reverend Charles W. Easley,
Jr., st. Mark's Lutheran Church.
The Pledge of Allegiance was
recited by all present.
"
44 1
June 11, 1991
IN RE:
PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
~ Resolution of Appreciation to Minor Keffer for his
service to the communi tv.
R-61191-1
Mr. Keffer was not present to receive the resolution but sent
word that he appreciated the recognition.
Supervisor Eddy moved to adopt the resolution. The motion was
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw.
NAYS:
None
RESOLUTION 61191-1 OF APPRECIATION TO MINOR E. KEFFER
FOR HIS MANY YEARS OF COMMUNITY SERVICE IN ROANOKE COUNTY
WHEREAS, Minor E. Keffer has been a lifelong resident of
the Catawba community in Roanoke County; and
WHEREAS, in 1941 he purchased the Catawba Mercantile, a
community landmark which is celebrating its 50th anniversary this
year, and was responsible for ensuring that a post office remained
in Catawba by providing the building, the water and the
electricity; and'
WHEREAS, he served as a member of the Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors, representing the Catawba Magisterial District
from 1948 to 1967; and
WHEREAS, other community service included assisting the
black community in getting electric services in the 1930's, serving
on a citizen's committee that inspected the old courthouse and
recommended expansion, and serving on the building committee for
"
~,
June 11, 1991
442
Lht:: 5cllt::m Civic Center.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia wishes to express its
sincere appreciation to Minor Keffer for his many years of devoted
service to the residents of Roanoke County.
FURTHER,
the
Board
of
Supervisors
offers
its
congratulations to Mr. Keffer upon the 50th anniversary of the
Catawba Mercantile.
On motion of Supervisor Eddy, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS:
None
~ Resolution of Appreciation uPon the retirement of
Samuel W. Crews.
R-61191-2
Mr. Crews was present to accept the resolution
Supervisor Eddy moved to adopt the resolution. The motion was
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw.
NAYS:
None
RESOLUTION 61191-2 EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO SAMUEL W. CREWS
FOR ELEVEN YEARS AND SEVEN MONTHS OF SERVICE TO ROANOKE
COUNTY
WHEREAS, Samuel W. Crews was first employed on November
5, 1979, as a Part-Time Account Clerk II in Finance, and became a
Full-Time Account Clerk on July 1, 1980; and
"
44 3
June 11, 1991
WHEREAS, Samuel W. Crews has also served as an Account
Clerk II for utility Billing, Account Clerk II for the Treasurer,
Account Clerk II for the Commissioner of Revenue, and as a Business
Ordinance Inspector; and
WHEREAS, many times during his employment with Roanoke
County, Samuel W. Crews in his capacity as an ordained minister
provided inspiration to many by his invocations at Board Meetings;
and
WHEREAS, Samuel W. Crews, through his employment with
Roanoke County, has been instrumental in improving the quality of
life for its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation
and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to SAMUEL
W. CREWS for eleven years and seven months of capable, loyal and
dedicated service to Roanoke County.
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best
wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement.
On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt resolution, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw
NAYS:
None
~ Recoqnition of County employees
~ Diane Hvatt for receipt of Excellence in
Financial Reportinq for Comprehensive Annual
Financial Reoort.
"
June 11, 1991
444
Finance Director Diane Hyatt was present and accepted the
award from Chairman McGraw.
~ Reta Busher for receipt of Distinquished BUdqet
Presentation for the Annual BUdqet.
Director of Management and Budget Reta Busher was present and
accepted the award from Chairman McGraw.
~ Brent Robertson for receivinq his desiqnation
as a certified PUblic Accountant.
Brent Robertson was presented to be recognized.
IN RE:
NEW BUSINESS
~ Approval of aqreement with Appalachian Power Comoany
for the purchase of electricity.
A-61191-3
County Attorney Paul Mahoney reported that the new Public
Authority Agreement with Appalachian Power Company will control the
electricity rates for a three-year period from July 1, 1990 until
June 30, 1993.
This agreement will result in a credit to
localities of the difference between the old rates and the new
rates for the period between July 1990 and November 1990.
Supervisor Eddy asked to see the comparison between the old
rates and new rates, and Mr. Mahoney responded that he would give
him that information.
Supervisor Nickens moved to accept the agreement. The motion
was carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw.
"
445
June 11, 1991
NAYS:
None
~ Approval of Aqreement with Certified Medical
Representative Institute. Inc. for fee in lieu of
Real Estate taxes.
A-61191-4
This agreement is a result of approval by the Board of IDA
bonds for CMRI, Inc., a non-profit entity. The fee in lieu of real
estate taxes equals 20% of the current assessed value of the
property. There was no discussion.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the agreement. The motion
was carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw.
NAYS: None
~ Request from Roanoke County Firefiqhters Association
for payroll deduction of dues.
A:,Z,1191-5
Supervisor Johnson advised that he requested that this item
be placed on the agenda because he did not agree with the County
Ad!rrinistrator's decision to deny the Firefighters Association the
use of payroll deduction for their dues. He asked that the Board
oVHr:;,oide the County Administrator's decision.
Supervisors Eddy and McGraw both stated they felt this should
be '~~i administrative matter.
Supervisor Johnson also asked for direction on the Board's
authority to place items on the agenda. Chairman McGraw suggested
"
June 11, 1991
446
-------<
that they con~ac~ nlm It there lS any problem in placing an item
on the agenda.
Supervisor Johnson moved to grant the request of the
Firefighters Association for payroll deduction of dues. The motion
was defeated by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Robers, Johnson
NAYS: Supervisors Eddy, Nickens, McGraw
IN RE:
REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS
~ Request for Work Session on June 25, 1991 to discuss
water lines for new water system.
Supervisor Nickens advised that he would be out of town during
the June 25 meeting and asked that the work session be held over
until July 9. Supervisor Johnson moved to set the work session for
June 25 and that it be continued to July 9, 1991. The motion was
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw.
NAYS: None
G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
~ Ordinance authorizinq an increase in the utility
Service Tax and addinq Water Service as a taxable
utility service.
Assistant County Administrator John Hubbard reviewed the
history of the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project.
Finance Director Diane Hyatt presented the financial plan for
"
44 7
June 11, 1991
-
funding the project and outlined the changes to the water rates and
connection fees. She advised that the rates will increase 35% the
first year and 10% for the following four years. The utility tax
rate will be increased from 6% to 12% of the first $15.00 of
residential service and $5,000 of commercial service.
Supervisor Eddy pointed out a minor modification to the
ordinance and Mr. Mahoney advised he would make the change.
Supervisor Eddy asked if any excess funds would be earmarked for
capital projects. Ms. Hyatt responded that the intent of the Board
in 1985 was that the funds would be used only for capital or debt
service.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve first reading with the
minor modification suggested by Supervisor Eddy, and with an
effective date of September 1, 1991. The motion was carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw.
NAYS: None
~ Ordinance amendinq the Roanoke County Code by
amendinq and reenactinq Section 22-82. Rates and
Fees of Chapter 12. Water by providinq procedures
for an increase in water service rates and
connection fees.
Supervisor Eddy asked that the Board consider his proposed
alternate rate structure. He expressed concern about the increased
connection fee and the effect on economic development. He asked
whether the Board could adopt future rate increases. Mr. Mahoney
"
June 11, 1991
448
l. t::::¡puIld~d that !uture ljoaras COU.La change the fee structure
whenever they choose, but the governing body would still be
responsible for paying off the revenue bond.
Supervisor Eddy moved to defer action until the completed rate
and feasibility study is received from the consultants.
Supervisor Nickens offered a substitute motion to approve
first reading of the ordinance.
Supervisor Eddy asked to present a statement prior to the vote
and requested that his comments be included in the minutes.
"Mr. Chairman, in the mid 1980' s a committee that included
representation from all the Roanoke Valley governments recommended
that a side-stream reservoir at Spring Hollow in western Roanoke
County was the best choice for a new water source to supply the
future needs of the region. This recommendation was made after the
committee evaluated many different possibilities.
In 1986, County voters approved a $15 million General
Obligation Bond issue to finance the County portion of the proposed
Spring Hollow dam and reservoir. About this same time, the Board
of Supervisors increased water rates and connection fees
significantly to a level calculated to generate the revenue needed
to build and operate the associated treatment plant, transmission
lines and storage facilities. This was all done with the
expectation that Roanoke and Salem would jointly contribute 40% of
the reservoir cost, and that the County's share would be $16
million. At that time payment of debt service on $16 million in
bonds was estimated to equal six cents of the County's real estate
"
449
June 11, 1991
-
tax rate or $30 per year for the owner of a $50,000 house.
Since that time, five years ago, Roanoke and Salem have
declined to participate in the project, and the estimated costs
have increased dramatically. Now, the first phase of the project,
to include a 23 million-gallon-per-day (MGD) reservoir, an 8 MGD
treatment plant, a transmission line from the treatment plant to
the southwest urban area of Roanoke County, and some local storage
tanks is estimated to cost more than $72 million. Debt service on
this amount is planned to be paid by the taxpayers and water users
of Roanoke County alone, excluding Vinton.
Today, the Board of Supervisors is being asked to approve a
water rate and fee structure that, over the next few years, will
double the rates and fees set in 1986. The increased cost to the
average homeowner will be over $200 per year, on top of the water
rates and fees set in 1986.
I have several serious concerns regarding this project and the
associated costs:
First, the County citizens are being asked to pay water rates
and fees that are drastically more than those expected when the
project was launched in 1986.
Second, no comprehensive study has been made of possible less-
expensive alternative sources of water for Roanoke County since our
neighboring jurisdictions pulled out and the costs escalated to
such a dramatic level. Cursory studies were conducted of obtaining
water from Smith Mountain Lake or the James River, but these
sources were concluded to be less cost-effective. I believe a new,
"
June 11, 1991
45 0
-
:::>t::l. .1.UU::¡, .iIldependent stuay or a.L ~ernatl ves should be conducted
before the Spring Hollow project passes the "point of no return".
Thirdly, the original purpose of a new water supply was to
serve the needs and to promote economic development in the entire
Roanoke Valley. That concept was abandoned during the
consolidation discussions and afterwards. I think the Spring
Hollow project should be deferred until we make at least one more
serious attempt to approach the Valley's future water needs on a
truly regional basis.
Fourth, I have questions over the specific rate and fee
structure that the Board is being asked to approve. I am not
convinced the consultant and staff have evaluated or given the
Board any realistic alternatives to consider.
For these reasons, Mr. Chairman, I plan to vote "No" on the
first reading of the proposed ordinance to increase water rates and
fees. Thank you."
Supervisor Nickens's substitute motion to approve first
reading of the ordinance was carried by the following recorded
vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Supervisors Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw.
Supervisor Eddy
~ Ordinance vacatinq an existinq 12 foot pUblic
utility and drainaqe easement located on Lot 4,
Block 5. Section 1. Hidden Valley Homes SUbdivision.
upon petition of Ronald B. Smith.
"
45 1
June 11, 1991
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve first reading of the
ordinance. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw.
NAYS: None
.L. Ordinances amendinq the Roanoke County Code
reqardinq Recyclinq and the purchase of recycled
paper.
~ Ordinance amendinq Chapter 20. "Solid Waste."
of the Roanoke County Code by the addition of
a new article III. "Recyclinq" by providinq for
certain recyclinq reports.
~ Ordinance amendinq Chapter 17 of the Roanoke
County Code by the addition of a new Section
providinq for a preference for the purchase of
recycled paper or paper products.
Mr. Hodge advised that he is setting a work session on the
Solid Waste Plan for June 25, 1991. Supervisor Nickens asked that
approval of the ordinances and plan be continued to July 9, 1991
because he will be out of town and will not be able to attend the
June 25 meeting. Mr. Hodge advised that the Solid Waste Plan must
be approved and submitted to the State by July 1, 1991.
Supervisor Robers moved to approve first reading of the
ordinances and set a work session for June 25, 1991. The motion
was carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, McGraw.
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Supervisor Nickens
~ Ordinance authorizinq conveyance of Riqhts-of-Way
"
June 11, 1991
452
in t101~J.ns communJ.ty Development Pro;ect
Botetourt County for acceptance by VDOT.
There was no discussion of this ordinance and no one was
to
present to speak.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve first reading of the
ordinance. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw.
NAYS: None
~ ordinance amendinq the Roanoke County Code by
amendinq Section 12-8. Adoption of State Law of
Article I of Chapter 12. Motor Vehicles and Traffic.
There was no discussion of this ordinance and no one was
present to speak.
Supervisor Robers moved to approve first reading of the
ordinance. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw.
NAYS: None
h Ordinance authorizinq the dedication of Vinyard Park
Drive to the City of Roanoke and the execution of
a new aqreement with the City concerninq Vinyard
Park Drive.
There was no discussion of this ordinance and no one was
present to speak.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve first reading of the
"
45 3
June 11, 1991
ordinance. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw.
NAYS: None
IN RE: APPOINTMENTS
~ Roanoke Valley Reqional Solid Waste Manaqement Board
Supervisor Nickens nominated John Hubbard to serve another
four-year term expiring July 31, 1995.
IN RE:
CONSENT AGENDA
R-61191-6
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the Consent Agenda with
Item 5 removed for discussion.
The motion was carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw.
NAYS:
None
Supervisor Eddy moved to approve Item 5 contingent upon
receipt of the necessary insurance documents.
The motion was
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw.
NAYS:
None
Supervisor Nickens asked the County Attorney to investigate
why Roanoke County must approve Fireworks Permits for the Town of
vinton.
RESOLUTION 61191-6 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN
CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS
ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA
"
June 11, 1991
45 4
-
У IT RESULV~U DY ~ne ~oara ot supervlsors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board
of Supervisors for June 11, 1991, designated as Item J - Consent
Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item
separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 5
inclusive, as follows:
1. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Board
of Zoning Appeals, Parks & Recreation Advisory
Commission, Virginia Western Community College
Board, and Roanoke Valley Regional Cable Television
Committee.
2. Acceptance of Sanitary Sewer Facilities serving sink
Sewer Extension.
3. Acceptance of Buckwood Trail into the Virginia
Department of Transportation Secondary System.
4. Acceptance of Fairway View Trail into the Virginia
Department of Transportation Secondary System.
5. Approval of Fireworks Permit for the Town of Vinton.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and
directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items
the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this
resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson with Item 5 removed for a
separate vote, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS:
None
Item 5 approved upon motion of Supervisor Johnson contingent
"
45 5
June 11, 1991
upon receipt of insurance documents, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS:
None
RESOLUTION 61191-6.c REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
BUCKWOOD TRAIL INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Buckwood Trail,
from the intersection of Route 864 to the cUl-de-sac, for a
distance of 0.32 mile to be accepted and made a part of the
Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the
Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and
a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore been
dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Buckhorn Wood
Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 12, Page 34, of
the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
County, Virginia, on November 14, 1989 and that by reason of the
recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor
consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-
way for drainage.
"
June 11, 1991
45 6
~ . That said roaéi known as ~uckwooa Tral1 and WhlCh is shown
on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same
is hereby established as a public road to become a part of the
state Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and
after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway
by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw
NAYS:
None
RESOLUTION 61191-6.d REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
FAIRWAY VIEW TRAIL INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Fairway View Trail
from the intersection of Fairway Estates Drive (Route 1380) to the
cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.60 miles to be accepted and made a
part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-
229 of the Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and
a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore been
dedicated by virtue of a certain maps known as Fairway Forest
Estates, Section 1 & 2 Subdivision which maps were recorded in
Plat Book 11, Page 41, and Plat Book 10, Page 122, of the records
"
45 7
June 11, 1991
of the Clerk's Off ice of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County,
Virginia, on January 15, 1987 and January 14, 1988 and that by
reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of
Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting
property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said
right-of-way for drainage.
3. That said road known as Fairway View Trail and which is
shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and
the same is hereby established as a public road to become a part
of the state Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only
from and after notification of official acceptance of said street
or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw
NAYS: None
IN RE:
REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
Supervisor Nickens asked County Administrator Elmer Hodge
to work with youth who do not live or attend school in Roanoke
County, and are no longer permitted to play youth athletics in the
County.
Supervisor McGraw announced that there will be a meeting
of the VACo/VML Task Force on July 2 in Richmond.
IN RE: REPORTS
Supervisor Johnson moved to receive and file the
"
June 11, 1991
45 8
following reports. Tne mO~10n carrled by a unanlmous voice vote.
1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
2. Board Contingency Fund
IN RE:
WORK SESSIONS
~ Capital Improvement Proqram
county Administrator Elmer Hodge reported that he would like
to adopt the Capital Improvement Program for future planning
purposes. He stated that he felt the format is not as important
as the process and the proj ects , and asked the Board to set
priorities or eliminate the projects. He advised that the Capital
Improvement Program should be adopted before going to bond counsel.
Supervisor Nickens responded that the first priority should
be to maintain what the County has now. Supervisor Eddy disagreed
and stated he felt that maintenance should not be included in the
CIP.
School Superintendent Bayes Wilson was present and advised
that they need to apply for literary loans now because it would be
at least two years before they could get the money. The School
Board could not afford to finance literary loans before then
because of the current debt service.
Supervisor McGraw asked about the deadline for placing a bond
referendum on the ballot. Mr. Mahoney responded that action must
be taken sixty days prior to Election Day. The Board would need
to take action at the first or second meeting in August.
Following further discussion, there was board consensus to set
"
45 9
June 11, 1991
-
another work session for July 9, 1991. The County Administrator
was directed to bring back the debt retirement schedule,
priorities, costs of salaries, available revenue and alternative
funding sources.
~ Parks & Recreation Commission
Parks and Recreation Director Stephen Carpenter introduced
William Skelton and Vince Joyce of the Parks and Recreation
Advisory Commission. Mr . Skelton reviewed the work of the
Commission in gathering information on the Senior citizens Center
and reported that they took two surveys.
Mr. Joyce presented the results of the surveys taken in 1989
and 1991. He advised that the senior citizen population will
double by the year 2003. They are currently utilizing the Ogdon
Center and six satellite operations for their senior citizen
activities. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission
recommends replacement of the Ogden Senior citizens Center and
would like to visit those who use the other centers to find out
what they want.
Supervisor McGraw suggested a regional approach with
participation by other jurisdictions and was advised that the
Commission supported that concept. Supervisor Nickens expressed
concern that if the possibility of a new center is taken to the
citizens, it may raise false expectations.
There was board consensus to support the Commission conducting
a survey of the other senior citizens groups to ascertain their
future needs, and that they explore the possibility of merging
"
June 11, 1991
46 0
-
-
act:i"vit:Ü~s with uLht::l. lUl,.;cll yuv~rnments.
IN RE:
ADJOURNMENT
At 6:50 p.m., Supervisor Nickens moved to adjourn. The
motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
~~q¿~
even A. McGraw, Cnalrman
"
-
"