HomeMy WebLinkAbout7/23/1991 - Regular
July 23, 1991
533
-
-'-~-~"'~_.'-"'- ----.~.. ---.,-_._--~,.,^
~- ..__.-, "-_. ""-~'--"'-
"~.--,¥'<.._-'._-~--_.,-~._.-.,., ~-.'.~ - -,' --'~'.~, ,.- ---
-.-,--..." --'---',- " -_... -,---._-- -. ..~_. --,"-.-.-' ..
.._._,_.~". ~~._~ ·"--0--"_-
.- -'.- ,.,,"-~- .- ..
.. ,_.~. ."...._."..__ '.mm.. "'_"'_~__'_'"_'._"M__>O___,_.,_.."._..,. _ ~_,._.....,
..~. "-'~-- '''--.'-'-- ...~. --.~..._".~
.' ,·,_.·_,·___·____._M~.__,____.,_~"
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Center
3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W.
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
July 23, 1991
The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met
this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the
fourth Tuesday, and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the
month of July, 1991.
IN RE:
CALL TO ORDER
Vice Chairman Nickens called the meeting to order at 3:00
p.m. The roll call was taken.
DUERS PRESENT:
Vice Chairman Harry C. Nickens, Supervisors Lee B.
Eddy, Bob L. Johnson, Richard W. Robers
DUERS ABSENT:
Chairman Steven A. McGraw
STAFF PRESENT:
Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M.
Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk;
Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk, John M. Chambliss,
Assistant County Administrator; John R. Hubbard,
Assistant County Administrator; Don M. Myers,
Assistant County Administrator; Anne Marie Green,
Information Officer
~
5 3 -4 "..
July 23, 1991
IN RE:
OPENING CEREMONIES
The invocation was given by the Reverend steven W. Harris,
Baptist Children's Home. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all
present.
IN RE:
REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA
ITEMS
County Administrator Elmer Hodge advised that Item D-4 under
New Business, Approval of Mutual Aid Assistance Agreement with City of
Salem, was being deferred to a later date.
IN RE:
NEW BUSINESS
~ AdoDtion of the revised Secondary Road Svstem Six-Year
Construction Plan for Fiscal Year 1991-92.
A-72391-1
R-72391-1.a
Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering and Inspections,
advised that the plan was revised due to the reduction by $339,767 to
$1,659,104 in the allocation from the Virginia Department of
Transportation. The Countywide Construction was reduced from $250,000
to $199,000; Incidental Construction reduced from $180,000 to
$167,500; and Numbered Projects reduced from $1,568,871 to $1,292,604.
Supervisor Robers moved to adopt the revised plan. The
motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens
NAYS:
None
,.
July 23, 1991
53 S
~
ABSENT:
Supervisor McGraw
RESOLUTION 72391-1.a APPROVING THE REVISED SECONDARY
SYSTEM SIX-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR ROANOKE COUNTY
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on March 26, 1991, to receive
comments on the Secondary Highway Six-Year Construction Plan for
Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1991-92; and
WHEREAS, The Board approved Resolution 51491-4 on May 14, 1991,
adopting the Secondary Road System Six-Year Construction Plan for
Fiscal Year 1991-92; and
WHEREAS, The Board was notified by the Virginia Department of
Transportation that Roanoke County's allocation had been reduced due
to the state's budget; and
WHEREAS, The Board does hereby approve the Revised Secondary
Highway Six-Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Year
1991-92 as set out on the attached summary.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution
duly attested be forthwith forwarded to the Virginia Department of
Transportation Salem Residency Office along with a duly attested copy
of the Revised Secondary Highway Six-Year Construction Plan for
Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1991-92 by the Clerk to the Board.
On motion of Supervisor Robers to adopt the resolution, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor McGraw
,.
..
536
July 23, 1991
~ Authorization to acceDt from Virainia DeDartment of
TranSDortation the Roanoke River Wavside on Route
11/460 for use as a Dub1ic Dark.
A-72391-2
County Administrator Elmer Hodge advised that the Virginia
Department of Transportation has offered to donate the 1.6 acre
Roanoke County River Wayside located on Route 11-460, approximately 5
miles south of Green Hill Park. The Parks & Recreation Advisory
commission unanimously recommended that the County accept the wayside
as a designated County park.
Approval of this donation is being
requested contingent upon environmental testing of the property.
In response to Mr. Eddy's inquiry, Mr. Hodge stated that
the wayside is used frequently and if the County does not accept the
donation, the Virginia Department of Transportation may abandon the
property. Supervisor Robers was informed that there is no cost for
the property and no restrictions are being placed on the use of the
land.
Supervisor Johnson directed that the staff bring to the
Board a report on the events surrounding the river property which was
offered as a donation to the County by Joe Thomas several years ago.
Supervisor Robers suggested that efforts should be made to
combine the Schools and Parks & Recreation maintenance of County
properties in order to provide better efficiency.
Supervisor Nickens and Supervisor Eddy indicated their
support to keep the wayside in the public domain but expressed
,.
July 23, 1991
531.- -
''!' -
-------_._._-------~
concerns about the maintenance costs due to the tight budget
situation. Supervisor Nickens was also concerned about the costs of
the environmental study.
Supervisor Johnson moved to accept the donation of the
wayside. The motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw
~ Reauest from the Roanoke County School Board to submit
1iterarv fund loan aDDlications.
A-72391-3
Finance Director Diane Hyatt was present to answer
questions.
Supervisor Eddy requested that the County Administrator
obtain additional information from the School Board. This information
should contain the specific justification for the projects including
why and what the project will accomplish.
Supervisor Eddy requested that the County Administrator
obtain a report from the School Board concerning the status of roof
leaks at the schools.
Supervisor Nickens requested that the estimates submitted
for each project should be calculated carefully in order to avoid
exceeding the amount stated.
In response to Mr. Eddy's inquiry about the status of
,.
538
July 23, 1991
securing a site for the proposed Cave Spring High School, Mr. Hodge
advised that the staff is reviewing property to obtain on an option
basis and will report to the board in two months.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the request to submit
literary loan applications. The motion carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor McGraw
~ ADDrova1 of Mutual Assistance Aareement with city of
Salem.
Mr. Hodge advised that this item had been deferred to a
later date.
IN RE:
REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS
A work session was set for August 13, 1991 with the Explore
Advisory Committee.
IN RE:
PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES - CONSENT
AGENDA
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the First Reading and to
set the public hearings and Second Reading for August 27, 1991. The
motion carried by the following recorded vote:
,.
July 23, 1991
539 ¡;~
-
AYES:
Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor McGraw
~ An ordinance to rezone 0.20 acre from B-1 to B-2 to
allow retail uses. located west side of US 220. Red
Hill area. Cave Sorinq Maaisterial District. uoon the
oetition of Maxev Homes Incorporated.
~ An ordinance to rezone aooroximatelv 12 acres from M-1
to B-2 and obtain a Soecial Exceotion Permit to ooerate
a retirement community. located north side of Route
11/460. west of Salem. Catawba Magisterial District.
uoon the oetition of Richfield Retirement Community.
~ An ordinance to rezone .71 acre from R-1 to M-1 to
allow a self-storaqe facility. located at 6426 Merriman
Road. Cave Sorinq Maqisterial District. uoon the
oetition of 301 Gilmer Associates.
IN RE:
FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
~ Ordinance authorizina the assessment of fees taxed as
costs in certain cases filed in the Courts of the
Countv for construction. renovation or maintenance of
courthouse. iail or court-related facilities.
County Attorney Paul Mahoney advised that legislation for
this assessment enacted last year included a "Sunset" provision making
it effective only until July 1, 1991. Since the 1991 General Assembly
removed the Sunset provision, this ordinance will remove the sunset
clause and make this a permanent assessment. The Finance Department
indicated that the County derived about $22,000 last year from these
fees.
In reply to Supervisor Nickens' question about the ordinance
being retroactive to July 1, 1991, Mr. Mahoney advised that this is an
,.
·
540 ¡;.
July 23, 1991
---
-
issue that is still awaiting guidance from the Attorney General's
Office.
Supervisor Robers moved to approve the First Reading of the
ordinance and to set the Second Reading for August 13, 1991. The
motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor McGraw
~ Ordinance amendina ChaDter 22. Water of the Roanoke
county Code by the addition of a new section 22-6.
"Reduction of Rates" to authorize the reduction of
water rates in hardshiD situations for elderlY and
disabled Dersons.
Supervisor Eddy questioned whether the County has the legal
authority to grant this credit. Mr. Mahoney explained that he does
recommend proceeding with the ordinance although there is no specific
state code provision covering this.
Supervisor Eddy questioned adjusting the criteria for this
ordinance to include income of $30,000 without having adjusted the
criteria for real estate tax relief. He indicated that he would like
to have the income tax relief in place before this ordinance is
adopted. -
Mr. Mahoney indicated that the amendments to the property
tax provisions will have its first reading on August 13, 1991, and
second reading August 27, 1991, with effective date of September 1,
1991. This ordinance is also written with a September 1st effective
,.
---------....----.--.-------------------"-----
July 23, 1991
541 .~
..__._--------
--- ~ ..
to bring this into conformance with the normal routine of the utility
billing cycle. The public hearing for this ordinance is set for
August 13, 1991.
With the concurrence of the Board, Vice-Chairman Nickens
directed that the ordinance be changed before the second reading to
reflect that the same application that is used to apply for tax relief
should be automatically used for the utility reduction.
After discussion of making the credit retroactive to July 1,
1991 for those being granted tax relief, Vice-Chairman Nickens
summarized that there would not be a problem with the bond market, and
that effective September 1, 1991, those already having their taxes
frozen could be accommodated to have their water rates frozen.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the first reading, to
appropriate $30,000 from the utility Fund, the second reading to be
held on August 27, 1991 at the same time of the real estate tax relief
ordinance, and that only one application shall be used to qualify for
relief from both real estate and utility rates. The motion carried by
the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor McGraw
~ Ordinance ratifvina and confirmina the acauisition and
acceDtance of the necessary easements for the
ValleVDointe Phase II Sanitary Sewer Pro;ect.
There was no discussion.
,.
542
July 23, 1991
Supervisor Eddy moved to approve the first reading of the
ordinance with the second reading set for August 13, 1991. The motion
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw
IN RE:
APPOINTDHTS
~ Communi tv Corrections Resources Board
Supervisor Nickens nominated Edmund Kielty to serve another
one-year term as a regular member instead of as an alternate member.
His term will expire August 31, 1992.
IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA
R-72391-4
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the Consent Agenda. The
motion carried by the fOllowing recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw
In response to Supervisor Eddy's question, Vice-Chairman
Nickens advised that approval of Item J-7 on the Consent Agenda will
be considered an acceptance of the Planning Commission Resolution and
not approval of the resolution.
,.
July 23, 1991
543 y~
_______o____~_· _ _
"._-_.._._.~------------
Mr. Hodge advised Supervisor Robers that no date was
mentioned for the creation of the Center on Rural Development in Item
J-4.
RESOLUTION 72391-4 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS
DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J CONSENT
AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of
Supervisors for July 23, 1991, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda
be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item
separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 8,
inclusive, as follows:
1. Confirmation of appointment to the Parks & Recreation
Advisory Commission.
2. Donation of drainage easements in connection with the
Hunting Hills Road Project.
3. Resolutions requesting acceptance of the following
roads into the Virginia Department of Transportation
Secondary Road System.
a. Crossbow Circle
b. Chukar Drive
c. Archer Drive
d. Red Stag Lane
e. Elk Hill Drive
4. Resolution of support for the creation of the Center on
Rural Development (CORD) and location of CORD in the
Roanoke Region.
5. Acknowledgement of acceptance of 0.10 miles of Lakeland
Drive, 0.02 miles of Green Meadow Road, 0.60 miles of
,.
544
July 23, 1991
Fairway View Trail and 0.32 miles of Buckwood Trail in--
the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary
System.
6. Acknowledgement of addition to, discontinuance, and
abandonment of portions of Route 752 and addition to
portion of Route 1765 in the Virginia Department of
Transportation Secondary System.
7. Transmittal of resolution from the Planning commission
regarding conformity of the Explore Park to the 1985
Comprehensive Plan
8. Donation of water line and sanitary sewer easement in
connection with Bernard Drive/Fallowater Sewer Line
Extension from Dominion Bank, N.A.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and
directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the
separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this
resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor McGraw
RESOLUTION 72391-4.c REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
CROSSBOW CIRCLE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application for Crossbow Circle, a
section of road extending from U. S. Route 220, extending in a
,.
July 23, 1991
545
-
------~._--_._-_._-_._-~--_.
southerly direction 0.58 miles to Elk Hill Drive, pursuant to Section
33.1-72.1, Paragraph C-1 and funded pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1,
Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended.
2. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of Virginia
an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necessary easements for
drainage as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 21, (Section 4), of record
in the Roanoke County Clerk's Office.
3. That this Board does certify that this road was opened to
public use prior to July 1, 1978, at which time it was open to and
used by motor vehicles.
4. That this Board does certify that speculative interests are
involved and a check for $2,750.00 has been received and placed in the
Capital Account for Revenue Sharing.
5. That said road known as Crossbow Circle and which is shown
on a certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be, and the same is
hereby established as a public road to become a part of the state
secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, only from and after
notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution, and carried
by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor McGraw
RESOLUTION 72391-4.d REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
,.
546
July 23, 1991
CHUKAR DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTHEHT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application for Chukar Drive, a
section of road extending from Crossbow Circle, 0.46 miles south of U.
S. Route 220 and continuing in a south westerly direction 0.10 miles
to a cul-de-sac, pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph C-1 and
funded pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of
Virginia of 1950, as amended.
2. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of Virginia
an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necessary easements for
drainage as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 21, (Section 4), of record
in the Roanoke County Clerk's Office.
3. That this Board does certify that this road was open to
public use prior to July 1, 1978, at which time it was open to and
used by motor vehicles.
4. That this Board does certify that speculative interests are
involved and a check for $198.00 has been received and placed in the
Capital Account for Revenue Sharing.
5. That said road known as Chukar Drive and which is shown on a
certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be, and the same is
hereby established as a public road to become a part of the state
secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, only from and after
notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the
,.
July 23, 1991
547
--------~_._------
Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution, and carried
by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw
RESOLUTION 72391-4.e REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
ARCHER DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTHENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application for Archer Drive, a
section of road extending from Crossbow Circle, 0.38 miles south of U.
S. Route 220 and extending in a northerly direction 0.198 miles to a
cUl-de-sac, pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph C-1 and funded
pursuant to Section 33.1-85.1, Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia of
1950, as amended.
2. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of Virginia
an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necessary easements for
drainage as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 21, (Section No.4), of
record in the Roanoke County Clerk's Office.
3. That this Board does certify that this road was open to
public use prior to July 1, 1978, at which time it was open to and
used by motor vehicles.
,.
548
July 23, 1991
4.
That this Board does certify that speculative interests are
not involved.
5. That said road known as Archer Drive which is shown on a
certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be, and the same is
hereby established as a public road to become a part of the state
secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, only from and after
notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution, and carried
by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor McGraw
RESOLUTION 72391-4.f REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
RED STAG LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application for Red Stag Lane, a
section of road extending from Crossbow Circle, 0.125 miles south of
u. S. Route 220 and extending in a westerly direction 0.06 miles to a
cul-de-sac, pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph C and funded
pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia of
1950, as amended.
,.
July 23, 1991
549
~------------,--_._-~_.__.
2. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of Virginia
an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necessary easements for
drainage as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 21, (Section 4), of record
in the Roanoke County Clerk's Office.
3. That this Board does certify that this road was open to
public use prior to July 1, 1978, at which time it was open to and
used by motor vehicles.
4. That this Board does certify that speculative interests are
not involved.
5. That said road known as Red Stag Road and which is shown on
a certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be, and the same is
hereby established as a public road to become a part of the state
secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, only from and after
notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution, and carried
by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor McGraw
RESOLUTION 72391-4.a REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
ELK HILL DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
,.
550
July 23, 1991
Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application for Elk Hill Drive a
section of road extending from Crossbow Circle 0.58 miles South of U.
S. Route 220 and extending in a westerly direction 0.08 miles to a
cul-de-sac pursuant to section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph C-1 and funded
pursuant to section 33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia of
1950, as amended.
2. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of Virginia
an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necessary easements for
drainage as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 21, (Section No.4), of
record in the Roanoke County Clerk's Office.
3. That this Board does certify that this road was open to
public use prior to July 1, 1978, at which time it was open to and
used by motor vehicles.
4. That this Board does certify that speculative interests are
not involved.
5. That said road known as Elk Hill Drive which is shown on a
certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be, and the same is
hereby established as a public road to become a part of the state
secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, only from and after
notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution, and carried
by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens
,.
July 23, 1991
55 1
------.-.-..- -.---
."- ..~ -- ,--_.~-- ...
--- '-" -.-.. --,-- -
.. ---...'-_. .-..
-~--_.>----_.....,,"..._-_._-_....,._----~-
m_'____..____.,__,_~.__..___.,._~,_"__,~__.~_____,~__..'._.___..__._
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor McGraw
..
IN RE:
REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD HEHBERS
SUPERVISOR EDDY:
(1) He requested an update on the citizen
survey that was conducted last week.
Mr. Hodge advised that the
survey results were not completed.
(2) He urged the staff and the
planning commission to proceed as rapidly as possible with the new
zoning ordinance and holding public hearings for citizens.
( 3 ) He
requested that a letter of appreciation be sent to the Brambleton
Avenue Association for their efforts at the beautification of triangle
area at Rt. 419 and Brambleton Avenue.
Supervisor Nickens and Mr.
Hodge explained that the County staff took over the maintenance of
this area and both Supervisor Eddy and Supervisor Nickens expressed
their appreciation to the staff.
(4) He commented that the board
members recently received copies of a book entitled "Zapp" about
employee empowerment.
He recently received a copy of the report
"citizens and Politics" and recommended it to the other board members.
IN RE:
REPORTS
Supervisor Johnson moved to receive and file the following
reports after discussion of Item 4 and 5.
The motion carried by a
,.
552
July 23, 1991
--~.-
unanimous voice vote with Supervisor McGraw absent.
,
1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
2. Board Contingency Fund
3. Accounts Paid - June 1991
4. Report on compliance and enforcement regarding display
of street address numerals.
supervisor Eddy suggested that a press release be made to
inform all citizens of the information in this report.
5. Report on the utilization of the Automated Message
System.
Supervisor Eddy suggested that the automated numbers that do
not receive calls should be discontinued and that all messages should
be kept updated.
Assistant county Administrator John Chambliss
advised that both of these items are being reviewed periodically.
IN RE:
RECESS
At 4:00 p.m., Vice-Chairman Nickens declared a recess for a
meeting of the Roanoke County Resource Authority.
IN RE:
RECONVENEHEHT
At 7:05 p.m., Vice-Chairman Nickens reconvened the meeting
in Open Session.
IN RE:
PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS
~ Resolution of Conaratu1ations to Glenvar Hiah School
Girls Softball Team for winnina State GrouD A__
ChamDionshiD.
,.
July 23, 1991
55 3
R-72391-5
Supervisor Robers moved to approve the resolution. The
motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor McGraw
Vice-Chairman Nickens presented the resolution to Coach
Spike Harrison and players Bobbie Jo Wright and Amy Moses who were
present.
Vice-Chairman Nickens also presented Coach Harrison with
Certificates of Appreciation for each member of the team and assistant
coaches.
Coach Harrison requested that the County post two signs in
the community congratulating the team since this is the third
championship they have won. Mr. Hodge was directed to report back to
the Board concerning the possibility of securing congratulatory signs.
RESOLUTION 72391-5 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO THE
GLEHVAR HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS SOFTBALL TEAK
FOR WINNING THE STATE GROUP A CHAMPIONSHIP
WHEREAS, the Glenvar High School Girls Softball Team, coached by
Spike Harrison, recently won the 1991 State Group A Championship; and
WHEREAS, the team achieved a record of 21 wins and only 3 losses
during the season; and
WHEREAS, high school sports are an important part of the
education of the children of Roanoke County, providing the opportunity
to learn coordination, competition and team playing; and
,.
55 4
July 23, 1991
WHEREAS, the Glenvar High School Girls Softball Team has
demonstrated an outstanding commitment to the goals and ideals of high
school athletics as well as excellence on the playing field.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of
Supervisors, on its own behalf and on behalf of the citizens of
Roanoke County, and particularly the citizens of the Glenvar
community, expresses congratulations to the GLENVAR HIGH SCHOOL
HIGHLANDERS and to COACH HARRISON on winning the State Championship.
On motion of Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor McGraw
IN RE:
PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
791-1
An ordinance to rezone 1.709 acres from A-1 to R-
3 to construct townhouses. located in Emerald
Court Subdivision. Reservoir Road. Hollins
Maaisteria1 District UDon the Deti tion of A. J.
Everett. Lvnward Twine and Cline Conner.
0-72391-6
Director of Planning & Zoning Terry Harrington presented the
staff report.
He advised that this rezoning would permit the
construction of up to nineteen townhomes.
From the original lot of
approximately 3.1 acres which is located in the Hollins Community
Development area, approximately seven single family lots have been
previously subdivided and this 1.7 acre is being proposed for multi-
family development. The Planning Commission recommended approval and
,.
July 23, 1991
55 5
_.._-~- .-
no citizens spoke at the Planning Commission. There were no citizens
to speak at the public hearing.
Supervisor Johnson questioned Mr. Harrington about a letter
from Webb's oil Corporation stating their concern about the additional
traffic produced by the townhomes on Reservoir Road. Mr. Harrington
indicated that Webb's oil Corporation's concern had been communicated
to the Virginia Department of Transportation and that VDOT will work
with the applicant to site the entrance in a safe manner because of
the heavy traffic.
Ms. Carolyn Bolton, representing the petitioner, displayed a
site plan and in response to Supervisor Johnson's inquiry, advised
that the selling price for the land with the townhome will be $67,000
to $70,000. She advised Supervisor Johnson that this is phase two of
Emerald Court development and that the engineering plans are not
complete.
Supervisor Johnson reminded Ms. Bolton that even if the
rezoning is approved, the peti tioner must get a permi t from the
Virginia Department of Transportation for an entrance.
Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor McGraw
ORDINANCE 72391-6 TO CHANGE THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.709 ACRE TRACT OF REAL
ESTATE LOCATED IN EHERALD COURT SUBDIVISION,
RESERVOIR ROAD, (PORTION OF TAX MAP NO. 27.08-2-
27) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE
ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A-1 TO THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF R-3 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE
,.
55 6 '
July 23, 1991
APPLICATION OF A. J. EVERETT, LYNWARD TWINE AND
CLINE CONNER
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 25,
1991, and the second reading and public hearing was held July 23,
1991; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public
hearing on this matter on July 2, 1991; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real
estate containing 1. 709 acre, as described herein, and located in
Emerald Court Subdivision, Reservoir Road, (Portion of Tax Map Number
27.08-2-27) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed
from the zoning classification of A-1, Agricultural District, to the
zoning classification of R-3, MUlti-Family Residential District.
2. That this action is taken upon the application of A. J.
Everett, Lynward Twine and Cline Conner.
3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the
following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts:
(a) Permitted uses on this 1.709 acre tract shall be
townhouses or lower density uses in accordance with 21-
22-4A (1-3).
(b) The height of the proposed structure shall not exceed
35 feet.
,.
July 23, 1991
. 55 7 ..
--------
(c) Type B screening shall be installed along the property
lines adjoining lesser density zoning in accordance
with Section 21-92 of the Roanoke County Zoning
Ordinance.
(d) The density of the proposed development shall not
exceed 12 units per acre.
4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
BEGINNING at the point common with the right-of-
way of Reservoir Road (Route 648) and the
northernmost property corner of Tax Parcel 27.08-
2-26; thence S. 01 deg. 49' 30" W. 26.60 feet to
the point of beginning of Lot 8, Emerald Court
SUbdivision; thence S. 01 deg. 49' 30" W. 217.29
feet; thence S. 67 deg. 30' 00" W. 207.43 feet;
thence N. 37 deg. 26' 19" W. 130.39 feet; thence
N. 23 deg. 30' 45" E. 292.31 feet; thence S. 66
deg. 29' 15" E. 25.22 feet; thence N. 69 deg. 44'
30" E. 107.05 feet; thence S. 20 deg. 15' E.
108.74 feet to the point of beginning, containing
1.709 acres.
5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty
(30) days after its final passage.
All ordinances or parts of
ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and
the same hereby are, repealed.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt ordinance, and carried
by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw
791-2 An ordinance to amend Droffered conditions on 3
acres zoned B-2 and obtain a SDecia1 ExceDtion
,.
558
July 23, 1991
0-72391-7
permi t to ODerate a home for the elder1 v. located --.
on Fallowater Lane. Cave SDrina Maqisterial
District. UDon the Detition of The wilkinson
GrOUD. Inc.
Mr. Harrington advised that the petitioner was not present
and in the event the supervisors had questions, the petitioner had
requested by letter that the item be tabled until the next public
hearing.
Mr. Harrington reported that the Planning Commission
recommended approval.
Supervisor Eddy expressed concern that the off-site
connection fees for mUlti-family projects and homes for the elderly
are unfair and undesirable from an economic standpoint.
Supervisor Johnson expressed concern about the density of
the project and the difference in description in the staff report of
100 unit assisted living home for adults and 100 residential units in
the proffered conditions. Mr. Harrington advised that the B-2 zoning
does not allow residences and this is considered an nursing home or
adult care facility and not a residential dwelling.
Supervisor Robers moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor McGraw
ORDINANCE 72391-7 TO AMEND PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON
,.
July 23, 1991
559
THE REZONING OF A 3-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE
LOCATED ON FALLOWATER LANE (TAX MAP NOS. 77.19-1-
34 AND 77.19-1-33) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL
DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2,
CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2,
CONDITIONAL (AHENDHEHT TO PROFFERS) UPON THE
APPLICATION OF THE WILKINSON GROUP INC.
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
June 25, 1991, and the second reading and public hearing was held July
23, 1991; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public
hearing on this matter on July 2, 1991; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law; and
WHEREAS, this property was rezoned from part R-3, MUlti-Family
Residential District, and M-1, Light Industrial District, to B-2,
General Commercial District, with proffered conditions, on December
12, 1986.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real
estate containing 3 acres, as described herein, and located on
Fallowater Lane (Tax Map Nos. 77.19-1-34 and 77.19-1-33) in the Cave
Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning
classification of B-2, General Commercial District, to the zoning
classification of B-2, General Commercial District, with amended
proffered conditions.
2. That this action is taken upon the application of The
Wilkinson Group Inc.
,.
56 0
July 23, 1991
3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the--
following amendments to proffered conditions approved by the Board of
Supervisors on December 16, 1986, which the Board of Supervisors
hereby accepts:
(a) Any dcvclopmcRt OR thc subjcct propcrty will ROt iRcludc the
uscs itemizcd iR paragraphs 5 through 12, iRc11:lsiyc, of
E:cctioR 21 2 J 2 of thc RoaRO]CC COURty Codc. A copy of said
ordiRaRcc is attachcd as Exhibit A. Anv development on the
sub;ect propertv will not include the uses itemized in
paraqraphs 5 throuqh 8 and paraqraphs 11 and 12. inclusive.
of Section 21-23-2 of the Roanoke Countv Zoninq Ordinance.
(b) The new street which will extend through the subject
property, will be constructed to state standards and will be
state maintained.
(c) No more than 100 residential units will be built on the
sub;ect property.
All other proffers and conditions would remain in full force.
4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
Beginning at a point on Fallowater Lane, being the
northeasterly corner of Lot 3 and the southeasterly corner
of Lot 4, Map of Tanglewood Executive Park, recorded in Plat
Book 10 page 112; thence N. 86 deg. 34' 53" W. 347.41 feet
to a point; thence N. 37 deg. 23' 23" W. 19.89 feet to a
point; thence N. 2 deg. 10' 52" W. 238.26 feet to a point,
being the northwesterly corner of Lot 4; thence N. 55 deg.
57' 50" E. 106.79 feet to a point; thence N. 48 deg. 20' 50"
E. 97.26 feet to a point; thence N. 43 deg. 23' 35" E. 62
feet to the center of a 15' drainage easement; thence with
the center line of the drainage easement S. 41 deg. 05' 57"
E. 97.22 feet to a point; thence continuing with the center
line of the drainage easement S. 44 deg. 07' 55" E. 125.00
feet to a point; thence continuing with the center line of
the drainage easement S. 67 deg. 19' 49" E. 62.51 feet to a
point on Fallowater Lane, point being 7.5 feet from the
northeast corner of Lot 4; thence with a curve following
Fallowater Lane with a radius of 285.00 feet, an arc
distance of 75.00 feet, a chord bearing S. 38 deg. 19' 45"
W. for a distance of 7.5 feet; thence with a curve following
Fallowater Lane with a radius of 285.00 feet, an arc
distance of 153.16 feet, a chord bearing S. 15 deg. 23' 42"
W. for a distance of 151.32 feet; thence S. 0 deg. 00' 00"
E. 104.34 feet to the point of beginning.
,.
July 23, 1991
561 ~
----------~. -- --~--
"--- -- ...-~-."-.
'-"""--_.- _.-- _.
-- --....- -- _._"-
~'~__.' ..···_·__····___.___,,_,_._"__.·,_m__..,··__.
_ -.__~_.__~_._".._...__..._'^_.__...._~.._,. ._·_·__m..~·__.~___."____·.__
5. That this ordinance shall be in f~l force and effect thirty
(30) days after its final passage.
All ordinances or parts of
ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall be,
and the same hereby are, repealed.
On motion of Supervisor Robers to adopt ordinance, and carried by
the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw
791-3 An ordinance to amend the Roanoke Countv Zonina
Ordinance to include Section 21-25-1. Exolore Park
District (EPD). to Drovide for a zonina district
desianated and reserved solelv for activities
associated with the Exolore Park.
0-72391-8
Mr. Harrington presented the staff report. He advised that
this ordinance would establish the Explore Park District as a zoning
district for activities associated with the Explore Park. This would
be the enabling authority under which the staff, the Planning
Commission and the Board would accept, review and approve the proposed
Explore Park.
Mr. Harrington reported that the ordinance outlines the
nature and type of information that the Virginia Recreation Facilities
Authority (VRFA) will be required to submit for review.
After the
information is submitted, there will be a process of negotiations in
order to arrive at an acceptable plan. Once the development plan is
,.
562,
July 23, 1991
-~----,
accepted and approved by the Board, it will serve as the concept of
. ..
the Master Plan for the varl.OUS phases of Explore beginning with
Explore 94. All subsequent administrative plans for the Explore Park
will be reviewed against this concept plan.
Supervisor Eddy pointed out several minor changes in the
ordinance where "shall" should be substituted for "should".
In response to Supervisor Nickens' inquiry, Mr. Harrington
advised that additional acquisitions for Explore must also go through
the rezoning process because VRFA does not have complete ownership of
some of the parcels of land and additional parcels may be purchased.
Mr. Harrington advised Supervisor Nickens that the "Failure
to Begin Development" clause was inserted in case anything changes
and the Explore Park does not proceed, these acres would still have
developmental rights by reverting back to the zoning in effect prior
to approval of the master plan.
At Supervisor Nickens' suggestion to apply this clause to
other rezonings in the future, Supervisor Johnson commented that he
believes this type of reversionary clause is illegal.
Vice-Chairman Nickens expressed appreciation to the members
of the Explore Advisory Committee and the staff for their efforts
regarding the total Explore concept.
Supervisor Robers moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor McGraw
,.
July 23, 1991
56 3
. -
---._.,+._------_._----_._--~--~-----~--~,_.,--_.-
ORDINANCE 72391-8 AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING
ORDINANCE BY THE ADDITION OF A HEW SECTION HUHBERED 21-25-
1, EXPLORE PARK DISTRICT (EPD) TO PROVIDE FOR A ZONING
DISTRICT DESIGNATED AND RESERVED SOLELY FOR ACTIVITIES
ASSOCIATED WITH THE EXPLORE PARK
WHEREAS, in order for the Explore Park to obtain local land use
approvals it is necessary for the Board of Supervisors to amend the
Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to include standards and procedures
for use in evaluating this proj ect and issuing the required zoning
approvals; and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 25,
1991; and the second reading and public hearing was held on July 23,
1991; and
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance be amended by the
addition of a new section numbered 21-25-1 and entitled Explore Park
District (EPD) as follows:
SEC. 21-25-1
EXPLORE PARK DISTRICT (EPD)
A. Purpose
The purpose of this district is to establish an area within the
County that is designated and reserved solely for activities
associated with the Explore Park, (hereafter referred to as the Park).
These district regulations are designed to permit a wide variety of
Park activities. In addition, they are designed to ensure, through
adequate public review, that areas surrounding the Explore Park are
afforded any protections necessitated by the Park's development and
operation. They are also designed to ensure that public facilities and
services are planned and are adequate to ensure the safe and efficient
operation of the Park with a minimum of impact on the surrounding
neighborhood and the larger community.
B. Applicability
These regulations shall only apply to land owned by the Virginia
Recreational Facilities Authority (VRFA) , and to any facilities,
and/or operations on such land, after review and approval by the Board
of Supervisors.
C. Permitted Uses
,.
564
July 23, 1991
The VRFA shall have the authority to plan and propose all uses
within the Park. However, approved uses and activities within the
Park shall be restricted to those uses and activities planned and
shown on the preliminary master plan, reviewed and approved by the
Board of Supervisors under the provisions of this ordinance.
D. Relationship to Existing Development Regulations
All zoning related site development regulations shall apply to
the development of the park, unless such regulations are modified as a
condition of the approved preliminary master plan.
E. Application Process
(1) Prior to submitting a formal application for review and
approval under these provisions, the applicant and county staff shall
confer to discuss the requirements of this section. The purpose of the
meeting is to obtain a mutual understanding of the application
requirements and process.
(2) Any application to rezone land to the EPD designation, shall
consti tute an amendment to the zoning ordinance pursuant to Section
21-105. The written and graphic information submitted by the VRFA as
part of the application process shall constitute proffers pursuant to
Section 21-105 E of this ordinance. Once the preliminary master plan
is approved by the Board of Supervisors, all accepted proffers shall
constitute conditions pursuant to Section 21-105 E.
(3) To initiate an amendment, the applicant shall complete an
rezoning application packet. This information shall be accompanied by
graphic and written information, which shall constitute a preliminary
master plan. All information submitted shall be of sufficient clarity
and scale to clearly and accurately identify the location, nature, and
character of the proposed district. At a minimum this information
shall include:
(a) A legal description of the proposed site. This may be
a metes and bounds description and plat, or a tabular summary of all
tax parcels proposed for rezoning. If tax parcels are used, a
composite plan shall be submitted, showing the limits of the proposed
district, and the location of each parcel within the district.
(b) Current information on the existing zoning and land use
of each parcel proposed for the district.
(c) If future additions to the district are envisioned, a
concept plan showing their location shall be submitted. This concept
plan shall show the relationship of these parcels to the proposed
district, and their intended use, if know~.
(d) A description and analysis of existing site conditions,
,.
July 23, 1991
~ I) 5· ~J
including information on topography, archeological and historic
resources, natural water courses, floodplains, unique natural
features, tree cover areas, etc. A general statement of planning
objectives is to be included indicating how the development and use of
the site will address the management and preservation of these
features.
(e) A generalized land use plan. This plan shall in
schematic form show the proposed location of all maj or land use or
activity areas. For each area designated, information shall be
provided in written and/or graphic form that describes the nature and
character of the improvements or activities proposed. This
information shall be of sufficient detail to clearly portray the
intended use and design objectives.
(f) For planned activity areas devoted to office, retail,
restaurant, lodging, education, conference, or other similar types of
commercial activities, information shall be provided on the maximum
intensity, size or number of such activities, their generalized
location and operating characteristics, and a generalized phasing plan
for their construction. The size and scale of all retail, restaurant
and lOdging facilities shall be limited to serve a support function to
the larger purposes of the Park.
(g) Generalized statements pertaining to architectural and
community design guidelines shall be submitted in sufficient detail to
provide information on building designs, orientations, styles,
heights, lighting plans, treatment of outside storage areas etc.
(h) The general arrangements envisioned for the management
and control of uses and activities not directly owned by VRFA shall be
included. This information shall address the general nature of such
uses, and the nature of any control proposed to be exercised.
(i) A description of vehicular transportation and
circulation objectives. This information should include information on
proposals and limitations on parking areas, and public, emergency,
service, and construction access. General information on the proposed
construction standards for these facilities should be included. The
generalized location of all existing or proposed major roads within
the district should be shown, and information concerning their
specifications provided. All points of connection to existing state
maintained roads should be designated along with the intended use of
each access point. Where access to existing state maintained roads is
proposed to be limited, design and operational characteristics
intended to limit use should be described.
(j) Information on expected vehicle trip generation shall
be included. Trip information shall be presented by phase of
construction, and type of trip, i.e., public, employee, service, etc.
,.
56 6
July 23, 1991
(k) Planning objectives for on-site pedestrian or bicycle--
circulation should be included, with a generalized location for
external points of connection. Generalized time frames for the
construction of such facilities, if any, should be included.
(1) statements of planning obj ecti ves and conceptual
designs for perimeter areas of the district. If buffer yards are
proposed at specific points, the design and location of these buffer
areas shall be included. Specific activities for all buffer areas
shall be included.
(m) Information on all proposed plans for public utilities,
including their conceptual design, location, and areas to be served.
If public utilities are to be provided in phases, each phase should be
indicated, with an envisioned time frame for its design and
construction.
(n) General information on employment levels within the
district by phase, should be provided indicating the expected number
and type of employees.
(0) Information on any anticipated noise, odor, air
pollution, water pollution, or other environmental impacts of the
district, and a plan to address these impacts.
(4) The completed rezoning application and supporting
preliminary master plan materials shall be submitted to the Planning
Commission for review and analysis. The Commission shall review this
information and make a report of its findings to the Board of
Supervisors. The Commission shall as part of its review hold a public
hearing pursuant to section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, as
amended. The proposed district shall be posted with signs indicating
the date and time of the Commission public hearing.
(5) The Commission shall make a report of its findings to the
Board of Supervisors within ninety (90) days of the receipt of the
materials, unless the VRFA requests, or agrees to an extension of this
time frame. The Commission's report shall recommend approval,
approval with modifications, or disapproval of the preliminary master
plan for the Park. Failure of the Commission to make a report of its
findings to the Board of Supervisors within this period shall
constitute a Commission recommendation of approval.
(6) If the Commission recommends denial of the preliminary
master plan, or approval with modification, the applicant shall, if
requested, have 60 days to make any modifications. If the applicant
desires to make any modifications to the preliminary master plan, the
Board of Supervisor's review and action shall be delayed until such
changes are made and submitted for review.
(7) The Board of Supervisors shall review the preliminary master
,.
July 23, 1991
56 7 ~
-.------
plan, and act to approve or deny the plan within ninety days. Approval
of the preliminary master plan shall constitute acceptance of the
plan's provisions and concepts as proffers pursuant to Section 21-105
E. of this ordinance. The plan approved by the Board of Supervisors
shall constitute the final master plan for the park. Once approved by
the Board of Supervisors, the Zoning Administrator shall authorize the
revisions to the official zoning map to indicate the establishment of
the EPD district.
F. Revisions to Final Master Plan
(1) Major revisions to the final master plan shall be reviewed
and approved following the procedures and requirements of Section 21-
105 E, above. Major revisions, as determined by the Zoning
Administrator may include, but not be limited to changes such as:
(a) Either (i) the addition of major new land uses or
activities not planned at the time of the approval of the final master
plan, or (ii) the substantial relocation of uses or activities shown
on the approved final master plan.
(b) The acquisition of property by the VRFA, if such
property is intended to be incorporated and used as part of the Park
activities.
(c) Any transportation or road alignment changes resulting
in any change in the location of public access to the Park, or
substantial changes in the location or number of service and employee
access locations.
G. Approval of preliminary and Final site Development Plans
(1) Following the approval of the final master plan, the VRFA or
its authorized agent, shall be required to submit preliminary and
final site development plans for approval. Final site development
plans for any phase or component of the Park that involves the
construction of structures or facilities, shall be approved prior to
the issuance of a building and zoning permit, and the commencement of
construction. Standards for preliminary and final site development
plans are found in a document entitled Land DeveloDment Procedures,
available in the Department of Engineering and Inspections.
(2) Preliminary and final site development plans submitted for
review shall be substantially in accord with the final master plan
approved by the Board of Supervisors. Roanoke County shall review and
approve or disapprove any Final Site Development Plan within sixty
(60) days of its submittal. Administrative review of these plans
shall ensure compliance with the approved final master plan.
H. Failure to Beqin Development
,.
56 8
July 23, 1991
Failure of the VRFA to submit a preliminary site development plan--
for at least one portion of the park within five (5) years of the
approval of the final master plan, shall constitute an application on
the part of VRFA to rezone the EPD to the district designations in
effect prior to the approval of the final master plan.
On motion of Supervisor Robers to adopt ordinance, and carried by
the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor McGraw
R.
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
~ Ordinance amendina and reenactina Article IV, Sewer Use
Standards of ChaDter 18 of the Roanoke County Code of
1985 (formerlv, Article III, of Chanter 16 of the
Roanoke County Code of 1971.)
CONTINUED UNTIL 8/13/91
utility Director Cliff Craig presented the staff report.
He advised that the 1972 Sewage Treatment Agreement between Roanoke
ci ty and Roanoke County requires the County to adopt ordinances to
conform to those adopted by the city. The State Water Control Board
and the U. S. Environmental Projection Agency have required the City
of Roanoke to amend their Sewer Use Standards.
The amendments are minor in nature and will not have a
significant effect on sewer use within Roanoke County.
The first
reading of the ordinance was held on July 9, 1991.
Copies of this
proposal have been sent to all sewer permit holders in the County.
Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the ordinance.
After
,.
July 23, 1991
56 9 ~~
:::=¡
------ -~---- ~----
------- ----
~-'.--" -~- --
. -.-"--.--.---.-.---.---,-.-'----..----..,
discussion and hearing from the two citizens present, Supervisor
Johnson withdrew his motion.
Mr. John Hansen. Environmental Coordinator for Inaersoll-
Rand ComDanv and Mr. Russell V. Randle. Environmental Counsel for
Inaersoll-Rand ComDanv. were present and requested the elimination of
the ban on the discharge of two metals, Bismuth and Molybdenum in the
ordinance. They are also requesting that Roanoke City eliminate this
provision from the ordinance and asked that the County contact Roanoke
City about this item.
It was the consensus of the board to (1) to direct the
County staff to continue with the present clarification and
interpretation of the ordinance, and (2) to continue the second
reading of the ordinance until August 13, 1991 so that the County
Administrator could attempt to obtain a response from Roanoke city.
IN RE:
ADJOURHHENT
Vice-Chairman
p.m.
,.