HomeMy WebLinkAbout5/24/1988 - Regular
I
I
-.-.---" - -_.-
.____.'._____._ nO .__
1
767
May 24, 1988
-- _.~-.,._---_.__.__._-_._--------------_._--._._--_..,.----.-.------ '. -
_.__ .~ __.m___.___._+"'_ _u _ .__ .
--..- -. ---.- -
l
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Center
3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
May 24, 1988
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
Co nty, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County
Ad inistration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday, and the
se ond regularly scheduled meeting of the month of May, 1988.
IN RE:
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Garrett called the meeting to order at 2:01
p. . The roll call was taken.
Chairman Lee Garrett, Vice Chairman Richard
Robers, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Steven
A. McGraw, Harry C. Nickens
ME BERS PRESENT:
ME BERS ABSENT:
None
ST FF PRESENT:
Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John
M. Chambliss, Assistant County
Administrator for Human Services; John R.
Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator for
Community Services and Development; Paul M.
Mahoney, County Attorney, Mary H. Allen,
Deputy Clerk
768
May 24, 1988
IN RE:
EXECUTIVE SESSION
At 2:03 p.m., Chairman Garrett moved to go into
Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a)
(2) to discuss a real estate matter with the Roanoke Valley
Regional Solid Waste Management Board. The motion was second
by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded v
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garre
NAYS:
None
IN RE:
OPEN SESSION
At 3:07, Supervisor Garrett moved to return to open
session. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and
carried by a unanimous voice vote.
IN RE:
OPENING CEREMONIES
The invocation was given by The Reverend Branan G.
Thompson, Colonial Avenue Baptist Church. The Pledge of
Allegiance was recited by all present.
IN RE:
REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF T
AGENDA
Supervisor Johnson asked that Item 1-5, A Raffle
Permit Application be added to the Consent Agenda.
Chairman Garrett asked that Item C-5, Resolution
of Appreciation to Robert Brown be added and that Item L,
a Work Session on Flood Control for the Roanoke River trib-
utaries be held following Proclamations and Resolutions.
I
I
IN RE:
Ru for
769
_ _ _Ma y_ 24-L- .1 98 8
PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
1. Proclamation recoqnizinq the Law Enforcement Torch
ics: Chairman Garrett
pr sented the proclamation to Lt. Michael Winston, Sheriff's
De artment in recognition of those Roanoke County law enforcement
of icials who will participate in the torch run.
2. Resolution of Conaratulations to Mountain View
El mentar School for National Reco nition as an outstandin
I sc ool: Principal Tom Hall was present to receive the
re
re
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the prepared
The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and
by the following recorded vote:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
None
RESOLUTION 52488-1 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO
MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FOR NATIONAL
RECOGNITION AS AN OUTSTANDING SCHOOL
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
Co nty, Virginia:
I
ca
AY
NA
WHEREAS, Mountain View Elementary School was recently
ho ored as a recipient of the 1987-88 School Program Award, and
770
May 24, 1988
--_.._~--- ---.-
- - ---
~_.._.~------~' ----_..
--¡¡
I;
I
WHEREAS, the school was one of over 600 schools from the
United States and Puerto Rico nominated for this honor by thei
state school superintendents, and
WHEREAS, only 287 schools in the United States and two i
the State of Virginia were recipients of this award of
excellence, and
WHEREAS, Mountain View Elementary School was cited for i s
outstanding special education programs for the learning-disabl
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervis rs
I
autistic and emotionally disturbed children and for handicappe
pre-schoolers.
of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby extend its
congratulations to Principal Tom Hall, the thirty-five teacher
and the 475 pupils of Mountain View Elementary School for thei
outstanding accomplishments, and
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia expresses its pride in Mountain View Elementary Schoo
and wishes continued success to all those who participated in
this achievement.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Nickens and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors JOhnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS:
None
I
I
I
771
. - - - -- -'
1 qAA
,,~_. - "... .,----.-- -- ..
3. Resolution of Appreciation upon the retirement of
Ro ert Merle Brown: Mr. Brown was present to receive the
re olution.
Supervisor Robers moved to approve the prepared
re olution. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and
ca ried by the following recorded vote:
AY S:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NA S:
None
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION
OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY TO ROBERT MERLE BROWN FOR ALMOST
25 YEAR OF SERVICES TO ROANOKE COUNTY
WHEREAS, ROBERT MERLE BROWN was first employed in October
of 1963 as a Deputy Sheriff in the Roanoke County Sheriff's
Of ice; and
WHEREAS, ROBERT MERLE BROWN has also served as a
De ective for five years (5) and Detective Sergeant since 1973.
Fo the last thirteen (13) years, he has diligently handled all
ca es involving bad checks, credit card fraud and other related
of enses.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Su ervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation
an
the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to
ROBERT MERLE BROWN
~
772
May 24, 1988
--'-.-
for almost twenty-five (25) years of capable, loyal and dedica ed
service to Roanoke County.
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its bes
wishes for a happy, restful and productive retirement.
4. Acknowled ment of Certificate of Excellence from t e
American Society for Public Administration: Chairman Garrett
announced that Roanoke and Botetourt Counties have received th
Public Administration Certificate of Excellence in recognition of
the cooperative community, economic and cultural development
projects undetaken by both counties. Director of Planning Rob
Stalzer introduced Sue Palmer, Hollins Project Coordinator; I
George Garretson, Library Director; and Bonnie JOhnson,
representing Botetourt County.
IN RE: WORK SESSION ON FLOOD CONTROL FOR THE ROANOKE RIVER
TRIBUTARIES
Assistant County Administrator John Hubbard reported th y
are looking at five tributaries - Carvins Creek, Masons Creek,
Peters Creek, Mudlick Creek and Back Creek. The solutions will
be very expensive and he recommended waiting until all studies
are completed and cost figures available before making any
decisions.
I
J
I
I
1
77 S
-.---------.-..---------..----..---.-.- ..--...-..----..---.----.-,-.----.---------
l
---.--------..-.-.-...-. --------------.------------------------...-------------.---
Mr. Hubbard introduced Carol Axrod, the Project Engineer,
wh handled coordination with the County staff and Ron Fascher.
Bo h are with the Wilmington District of the Corps of Engineers.
Ms. Axrod advised that they have not received funding to
be in to study Mason Creek. They have completed the study of
Pe Creek and determined there is no federal interest in flood
trol on the portions located in the County. They have
pe formed an interim study of Mudlick Creek in 1986. They have
co cluded there is no federal interest in flood control for this
or Back Creek because the damage was not sufficient to support a
pr ject. Lick Run, Tinker Creek and Glade Creek are presently
un er study. There are three damage areas on Carvin Creek - at
Ho lins College, at Hugh Avenue, and at the subdivision known as
Su Valley and homes on Greenway Drive, which had substantial
They have studied dry reservoirs, channelization, flood
and diverting Carvin Creek into Tinker Creek. They did
these solutions financially feasible.
Supervisor Johnson advised he was concerned that the
fe eral government was more concerned with alleviating flood
da age for businesses than residents such as those in Sun Valley.
He recommended a community meeting with the residents affected by
fl so that the Corps of Engineers could explain the process to
th
da age.
pr ofing
no find
77 4
May 24, 1988
----
--~_._~
Supervisor McGraw moved to set a work session for J ne
28, 1988 on drainage and flood control to include proposals t
buy the flood prone properties at fair market value for resal ,
the possibility of a bond referendum and any other alternativ
to reduce the flood problems. The motion was seconded and
carried by a unanimous voice vote.
Supervisor Johnson requested community meetings with
residents following the work session.
IN RE:
NEW BUSINESS
1. AdoDtion of the budaet for fiscal year 1988/89:
I
Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the budget for fiscal year
1988-89. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers.
Supervisor Robers reminded the Board that as a result
of the budget problems this year, members of the board and staf
have been meeting with school board members and school staff to
continue study of consolidation of services.
Supervisor Nickens moved to amend Supervisor Johnson'
motion so that the VSRS payment be included with the teachers
salaries to reflect a 12.3% salary increase rather than 7.3%.
There was no second to the amendment and the motion died.
Supervisor Johnson's original motion carried by the
I
following recorded vote:
775'
_.Ma ___.2..4+-. l.9..8.R
------ -..
AY s:
NA s:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
None
2. Credit and Reimbursement for water and sewer
co struct ion to Trent's Trace: Utility Director Clifford Craig
re orted that Boone Builders is developing a residential
su on West Ruri tan Road and will be required to extend
water and sewer facilities. They are requesting board
au of the use of the second half of their off-site
fa ility fees to be credited against the $90,000 cost to install
I th water line. They are also requesting a sewer reimbursement
ag eement for 75% for a period of ten years. The staff
re ommends that the Board authorize the immediate reimbursement
of the second half of their off-site facility fees and a
fi e-year reimbursement agreement for the sewer facilities.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the staff
re ommendation amended that the sewer facility reimbursement be
I
fo ten years instead of five. The motion was seconded by
Su ervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote:
AY Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NA None
3. Credit for water construction to Windemere
Su division: Mr. Craig advised that a 16 lot subdivision was
be ng developed adjacent to three existing streets. The
de eloper will supply water service to the subdivision and will
776
May 24, 1988
extend a 12 inch water line if the County will give him credit
against his fees. Staff recommended authorization for the
additional fees, above the $8,288. This credit would be for
$1,712.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the staff
recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw nd
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garret
NAYS:
None
4. Authorization to approve contracts with airport
Commission and Roanoke City for the Vallevpointe Proiect: Cou ty
Attorney Paul Mahoney reported that it is necessary to conclud
certain agreements with the Airport Commission and the City of
Roanoke to proceed with the Valleypointe Project.
Supervisor Garrett moved to authorize the County
Administrator to execute the necessary contacts. The motion w s
seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw
5. Adoption of a Vehicle Utilization Policy:
Assistant County Administrator John Chambliss reported that at
the April 26th meeting, the board of Supervisors suggested
r
,I
I
I
I
I
I
"
777
--'. -. -.-....--...... -~_._.,._- ._...."..._~.._--
___ u ______________________________Mª¥___2.L__l.9..B.ß
---.-.--.----.-.'.-----.-.- .-..-..-. ,. ..-_..__....-._.....-.._",-_..,-,._..__.._._~--_._._--.-------...----.......-....--.-.--.-.----
se era I changes to the proposed policy. The policy has been
re to reflect a 12,800 mile limit instead of a 10,000 mile
Iii t as previously recommended. This proposal is in agreement
wi h the Central Garage for the Commonwealth of Virginia. The
st ff recommends that the proposed policy be approved; that the
ap ropriate vehicles be declared surplus; and that consideration
be given for an automobile allowance supplement to their salary
be determined at an appropriate monthly rate.
Supervisor Nickens stated he felt that there were
ve icles used less than 12,800 that could be reassigned thereby
el minating at least 11 older vehicles which would save funds.
Supervisor Nickens moved that employees using their
pe sonal car be reimbursed according to the state rate of
mi eage; that 11 sedans be eliminated from the fleet, and that
th County Administrator be authorized to implement an automobile
po icy. There was no second to the motion and it died.
Mr. Hodge asked that the policy be adopted and that he
be allowed to assign the necessary vehicles. Supervisor Robers
su gested that rather than a specific policy, that only employees
dr ving more than 15, 000 non commuting miles be allocated a
ve icle and all others be part of a fleet with employees being
re bursed at the state rate for use of their personal car.
778
-------Ma¥- 24. -l-9 a a
._."_._-~------_..
--------------,--
..~._._---~------.._-,_._'--~----_.-
Supervisor Nickens moved that the policy be adopted nd
that no new vehicles be purchased in 1988/89. There was no
second and the motion died.
Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the policy with th
understanding that only 356 vehicles would remain in the fleet as
of July 1, 1988. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnso
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, McGraw, Garret
NAYS:
None
IN RE:
REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS
I
Chairman Garrett announced that a work session on fl od
control and drainage had been set for June 28, 1988.
Supervisor McGraw requested a work session on the
possibility of a referendum vote on election of school board
members on June 14, 1988.
IN RE:
REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
Supervisor Johnson moved that a letter of concern be
,I
-I
I
I
sent to Botetourt County regarding a proposed land strip which
could affect the Bonsack Community. The motion carried by a
I
unanimous voice vote. Supervisor Johnson also expressed conce n
.,
779
May 24, 1988
~:::=--_:::_----:=:- -
I
I
I
- _. ..- ..- -
-
-.-._--_'_- -.-
ab ut the proliferation of large billboard signs. He asked staff
to investigate the possibility of a new sign ordinance which
wo ld insure that these large signs are not "grandfathered" in
th ordinance, and that these signs are taxed whether or not the
ow ers are located in Roanoke County.
Supervisor Robers announced he had made contact with
Center for Innovative Technology concerning alternate methods
solid waste management. He will bring back a report. He also
gested that students be involved in the waste management
and proposed that scholarships could be awarded for
research.
Supervisor Robers also advised that Roanoke
appointed members to the Roanoke Valley Cooperation
ittee and that the committee had established five priorities.
Supervisor McGraw asked the board members to review the
from the Roanoke Valley Cooperation Committee. He
a ounced that the VACO/VML task Force has met and prepared a
to VML on annexation issues. Supervisor McGraw
that County Administrator Elmer Hodge and
sistant County Administrator John Chambliss be appointed to the
anoke Valley Cooperation Committee. Chairman Garrett concurred
suggested that all localities involved have two elected and
t 0 appointed representatives.
780
May 24, 1988
Supervisor Nickens requested a board report
14th allocating the human services funding that would
last year's recommendations. Supervisor Nickens moved that
$3,000 be allocated to the Vinton Rescue Squad 50th Anniversa
celebration and $1,500 be allocated to the Council of Communi
Services Information and Referral Services from the Board
Contingency Fund. The motion carried by a unanimous vote.
Supervisor Garrett announced that Occidental
Developers, Inc. has requested a continuance to a later date or
their rezoning petition.
II
on June
be base on
IN RE:
CONSENT AGENDA
I
Supervisor Johnson had previously requested the
addition of Item 5, approval of a Raffle Permit for the Commu ity
School. Supervisor Nickens requested that Item 1, Acceptance of
settlement offer with Roanoke Gas company for destruction of
backhoe, be deleted for discussion.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the Consent Age a
with the addition of Item I-5, and the deletion of Item I-l. he
motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garre
I
I
I
781
----.-----.---,---------..---
________ May 24, 1988
--->.---.---.--......--------.----.---------
----,,----
--_.-._----_....__._------_._--,.._.------~._--------"
NA S:
None
RESOLUTION NO.52488-8 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH
ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I -
CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain section of the agenda of the
B rd of Supervisors for May 24, 1988, designated as Item I -
C sent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to
e h item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1
t 4, inclusive, as follows:
i7_Aeeeþcaftee-e£-secc±emeftc-e££er-w±cft-Reafteke-6as
eemþafty-£er-clescrtlec±eft-e£-ðaekftee
2. Confirmation of Committee appointments to the
Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals
and Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission.
3. Request for acceptance of Chippenham Drive and
Kettering Court into the Va. Department of
Transportation Secondary System.
4. Authorization to pay appraisal fee for Palmer
Property.
5. Approval of Raffle Permit for Community School
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
a d directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
II ~
782
Mav ~1988 -
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant 0
this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson after the deletion
Item 1 and the addition of Item 5, seconded by Supervisor Rob s
and the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garre
NAYS:
None
RESOLUTION 52488-8.b REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
CHIPPENHAM DRIVE AND KETTERING COURT INTO THE VIRGI IA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
and Kettering Court from its intersection with Pleasant Hill
proceedings herein, and upon the application for Chippenham Dive
Drive Route 1548 to the intersection of Kettering Court for a
distance of 0.10 miles, and Kettering Court intersection with
Chippenham Drive to the terminus at the cul-de-sac for a dist ce
of .04 miles, to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary
System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virgin'
State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easement
and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have been
dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Kingston Court,
~--
I
I
"
783
~~I------- -
-Ma¥ 24, 1988
-- -- -~--------- -- ~-------~--_. -------------
Se tion No. 1 Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 10,
Pa e 6, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court
of Roanoke County, Virginia, on May 13, 1986 and that by reason
of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers,
no consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting
pr perty owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said
ri ht-of-way for drainage.
3. That said road known as Chippenham Drive and Kettering
Co rt and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this
Re olution, be, and the same is hereby established as public road
I to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in
Ro noke County, only from and after notification of official
ac eptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department
of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Ro ers and carried by the following recorded vote:
AY S: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
NA S: None
Acceptance of settlement offer with Roanoke Gas Company
fo destruction of backhoe: Supervisor Nickens asked if the
Co nty requested a new backhoe from Roanoke Gas. Clifford Craig,
Ut lity Director, responded they did at the cost of $42,300. The
I
on destroyed was 2-1/2 years old and was originally worth
$6 ,000. In response to a question from Supervisor Nickens, Mr.
784
MÇJ Y ? 4. ..l9ßß- _
II
!
Craig reported that insurance covered $22,480,and the settle nt
offer from Roanoke Gas was $14,923.
Supervisor Nickens moved to deny the settlement off r
because he felt that the Gas Company should have settled for 11
replacement value. There was no second and the motion died.
Supervisor Garrett moved to accept the settlement 0 fer
from Roanoke Gas Company. The motion was seconded by Supervi or
McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS:
Supervisor Nickens
IN RE:
CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
Alfred Powell, 3440 Franklin Street, spoke in
opposition of adoption of the budget for fiscal year 1988/89. He
felt there were substantial reductions available in unnecessa
or non-essential programs.
IN RE:
REPORTS
Supervisor Johnson moved that the following reports e
received and filed. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Mc raw
and carried by unanimous voice vote.
1. Accounts Paid for the month of April 1988.
I
I
I
I
-1
7 B 5 ;<
May 24, 1988
----_._---_.._------~---
--'- .--..---...-.- .. ..._.-.. ---
____.._..0.____._·_.__·_ __ ,___,..._~...., '_'__'". . _ ._.._______~__.., ,__ _.~.___~__'_~__.._ ~.___... __...__
_._---~_..__.__._--_._.- _..._-_._---._.--~-_._-_..._._._-_..__..__..._._.._----....--.-.--------..-...------¥--------
..u____·.·_·._'___ ....._.._
2. Update on Automated Refuse Collection System
3. Income Analysis and Statement of Expenditures -
A il 30, 1988.
4 . Report on Space Needs for Roanoke County.
5. Board Contingency Fund
6. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance
7 . General Fund Unappropriated Balance
Supervisor Nickens requested that the staff prepare
m ia releases on the success of the automated refuse collection
s
I
EXECUTIVE SESSION
At 5:25 p.m. Supervisor Robers moved to go into
Ex cutive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a)
(1 to discuss a personnel matter. The motion was seconded
by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote:
S: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
N S:
IN RE:
None
OPEN SESSION
186
May 24. 1988
___~·___ø'_.·___~ ~._
I-~
At 6:05 p.m. Supervisor Garrett moved to return to 0 en
session. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garret
NAYS: None
IN RE:
RECESS
At 6:06 p.m., Chairman Garrett declared a dinner
recess.
IN RE:
EVENING SESSION
At 7:05 p.m., Chairman Garrett reconvened the meeti
IN RE:
RESOLUTIONS, PROCLAMATIONS
1. Resolution of Con ratulations to the Roanoke Val e
Sauires for winninq the State AAU Basketball Championship.
Chairman Garrett announced that the Roanoke Valley Squires ha
won the State AAU State championship and will be going to
Lawrence, Kansas to compete in the national AAU tournament.
certificates and a resolution.
I
I
I
I
1
May 24, 1988
787
--
-
------
supervisor Robers moved to approve the prepare
res lution. The motion was seconded by supervisor McGraw and
car ied by the following recorded vote:
supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
AY
None
RESOLUTION CONGRATULATING THE STATE
AAU CHAMPIONSHIP BASKETBALL TEAM,
THE ROANOKE VALLEY SQUIRES
WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley squires basketball team,
c posed of twelve and thirteen year old boys from Roanoke, Cave
S
and Botetourt County, recently won the State AAU
C ampionship, in Staunton, Virginia, compiling a 5 - 0 overall
r cordi and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley squires, coached by Lacy
dley, and assisted by Tom Ondrus, and Scott prince, will p1:ay
the national AAU finals beginning August 6, 1988, in Lawrence,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE I T RESOLVED that the Board of
upervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia congratulates an
ommends the following members of the Roanoke Valley squires fo
heir outstanding athletic achievement:
Trey Ondrus
Greg Cooper
Daniel Orfield
Bobby Prince
Greg Journette
Tim Basham
7881
'..'--'-'-.' --- - -
May 24, 1988
^- ,-- --_.- ---~---" ,~-_._, ---
__'_'_"___'._~_____'_""_·..·_'H_'_ ...
. .--~'--'---'_._'_."-"'--'-----'~--'._--"-"'-""'--- ~._,~.._._.
-------.-'--.-'
Steven Kagey
Curtis Staples
and further, expresses its strong support that the Roanoke Va ley
Mike Bramblett
Jay Turner
Stephen Hawks
J. P. Wilson
Squires will be victorious at the national AAU tournament in
Lawrence, Kansas.
IN RE:
588-1
588-2
PUBLIC HEARINGS
petition of Inland Properties Corporation to
rezone a 1.70 acre tract from R-1 Residential
B-1 Business to construct an office complex
located on the east side of Route 419 immediat
south of its intersection with Cordell Drive i
the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. (CONTI
FROM MARCH 22, 1988)
This petition was continued to June 14, 1988.
Petition of Virainia First Savinas. F. S. B. t
rezone a 0.787 acre tract from R-3, Residentia to
B-1 Business to construct a building containin a
bank and offices, located immediately southwes of
the intersection of Electric Road (Route 419) d
Chaparral Drive (Route 800) in the Cave Spring
Magisterial District.
APPROVED WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS
Director of Planning Rob Stazler presented the staf
report. The petition was heard by the Planning Commission on
I
I
I
I
1
789
?4.1QAR
.
3, 1988. No one was present in opposition. The significant
i act factors include the 46 parking spaces. Eight spaces
s uld be eliminated to avoid interference with thru traffic.
is no location identified for for automatic teller machine.
are proffered conditions, and the Planning Commission voted
u nimous approval wi th one members absent to approve the
Heywood Fralin, attorney for the petitioner was present.
He explained the change in the proffered conditions. The first
ch nge states that the lighting on the sign will be turned off at
10 00 p.m. The second change states that the proposed sign will
be submi tted to the Planning Department for approval prior to
co struction. This will be a two-story office facility housing
th banking on the first floor and the mortgage facility on the
se ond floor. The neighbors are in favor of the rezoning. The
au omatic teller machine will be located on the outside wall of
th building and the parking spaces that concerned the staff will
be designated as employee parking.
Supervisor Robers moved to grant
mo ion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson
fo lowing recorded vote:
AY S: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NA S: None
the petition. The
and carried by the
FINAL ORDER
790
-...-- -.----M-ay--:::2::b: 1 9 Q B
~---'-_._._.....~._... -._...~
~l
II
- -
.' . _...._,,--_.__._.._"'-_..._.",..._...~ .. -'-'-,'.--""
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
parcel of land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax M s
as Parcel 87.06-4-4 and recorded in Deed Book 1266, page 792 d
legally described below, be rezoned from R-3 Residential Dist 'ct
to B-1 Business District
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and t t
he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning p
of Roanoke County.
BEGINNING at a concrete monument on
the south side of Route 419, at the
intersection with the west side of
Route 800, thence S. 280 44' 54" E.
53.10 feet to a concrete monument;
thence with the westerly side of
Route 800, S. 210 13' 32" W.
139.56 feet to an iron; thence with
the remaining property of Fralin
and Waldron, Inc., N. 700 35' 19"
E. 159.32 feet th the BEGINNING and
containing 343,262.29 square feet,
and being 0.787 acre parcel.
PROFFER OF CONDITIONS
1. Office building will be built in substantial
compliance with the conceptual plan.
2. All lighting in parking areas will be directed
downward, with minimum lighted areas during evening hours.
3. There will be no lighting on the identification si n
after 10:00 p.m.
I
I
1
791
~ ?4, ] qAA
4. In the event an automatic teller machine is
it will be installed against the building.
5. The spaces designed for employee parking on the
plan will be used for employee parking only.
6. The sign will be constructed in accordance with the
design plan, and the proposed design plan will be
s mi tted to the Planning Department for approval prior to
588-3
I
588-4
of said sign.
petition of Occidental Development Ltd. to rezone
a 2.0 acre parcel from R-1, Residential to B-1
Business and a 22.87 acre parcel from R-1,
Residential to R-3 Residential to construct
offices and multi-family dwellings, located
immediately west of the intersection of Colonial
Avenue and Ogden Road in the Cave Spring
Magisterial District.
CONTINUED AT THE REQUEST OF THE PETITIONER TO JUNE
14, 1988
Petition of the Hobart Companies to rezone a 14.93
acre tract from R-1, Residential to B-2, Business
to construct an office complex, located on the
north side of Electric Road (Route 419)
approximately 700 feet west of its intersection
with Postal Drive in the Windsor Hills Magisterial
District.
APPROVED WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS
Mr. Stalzer reported that this petition was heard by
I th Planning Commission on May 3rd. There were two citizens in
op osition and five in support. The concerns were light glare,
dr inage, increased traffic and noise.
792
-May-- ~ 4-r- -.19-8-&--
_.,~.._."..._,...._._._- -
jf
There were two significant impact factors. The
traffic generated is estimated at between 1,900 and 2,280. T
was a concern about circulation concerning one of the entranc s
through the existing Signet Bank. There are proffered condit ons
to the rezoning request. The Planning Commission voted in
support of the request 4 to 0, with one member absent.
Ed Natt, attorney for the petitioner was present. He
described the development of the property which will be known as
Colonade II. The project contains four buildings with
approximately 137,000 square feet of additional office space.
The design will be compatible with the existing Colonade I. e II
access will be through existing Colonade Park, and through th
Signet Bank. 55% of the property will remain green space and
approximatley 45% will be developed. The petitioner met with he
citizens to hear comments and concerns. Twelve people attend
the meeting.
In response to a question from Supervisor Nickens,
Mr. Natt advised there will be a four-lane road and bridge wi
the necessary culverts across the creek. The petitioner will
ensure that there will be no debris backing up the water in t
creek. Mr. Stazler advised they are satisfied with the drain e
plans.
The following citizens spoke concerning this rezo 'ng
petition:
I
I
I
7Ç\g·
l
_.~ -..... .~..__._.....
1. Paul Bell 27055 Hillbrook Drive, opposed the
pe i tion because of the potential of flooding in the Cresthill
2. Llovd Lazarus spoke in opposition. He was
c cerned that there would be a convenience store and food
vice store on the property and that a traffic light would be
at the intersection of McVitty Road and Route 419.
3. John Paul Johnson spoke in opposition because of
drainage and flooding problems from Mudlick Creek.
4. Roqer Lordon spoke representing the Cresthill
He was concerned about the groundwater runoff from
retention pond into Mudlick Creek.
Supervisor McGraw asked for an explanation on how a
re ention pond works. Director of Engineering Phillip Henry
ad ised that a retention facility is designed based on a two-year
st rm. The storm must be severe to be held in a retention pond.
Mr Henry stated that the runoff from the proposed development
wo ld be approximately the same as if the property were developed
as R-1 residential homes.
Supervisor Garrett asked Mr. Henry if this
de elopment would have a significant negative impact on the flow
fr m Route 419 to the lower part of Cresthill Drive. Mr. Henry
re ponded that while it would have a negative impact, it would
no be significant.
_._--,_.-_._~ "
794:
---May _24, - - .1988 -
c ---- --~'~~=::.-:=:::I~-:~-:..·~
I
r
Ii
II
Ii
'I
I
ì
~-.- -_. --. ."..~.- "--_._- .~
Supervisor Garrett outlined the publicity and pIa
that took place during the study of the 419 Corridor Plan.
Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the petition wi
proffered conditions. The motion was seconded by Supervisor
Robers and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garre
NAYS:
None
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
parcel of land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax M s II
as Parcel 76.16-1-39 and Parcel 76.16-1-38 and recorded in De
Book and legally described below, be rezoned from R-1
Residential District to B-1 Business District
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and t t
he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning p
of Roanoke County.
A 14.93 acre parcel of land generally
located on the North Side of Va.
Sec. Route 419, east of Mudlick and
west of the Cave Spring Office
Park, within the Windsor Hills
Magisterial District
PROFFER OF CONDITIONS
I
~
795
PI - .... -- ..
--- -_._-_.- ----.
M;:¡y ?4. 1 qAA
1. Project will be developed in substantial conformity
wi h the site plan prepared by Ernie Rose Architects, submitted
he ewith.
2. There will be no additional entrance/exists on Route
41 .
3. Screening and buffering will be as proposed on the
si e plan of Ernie Rose, architects.
4. All lighting will be directed away from the adjoining
re idential property.
Poles shall be not more than 20 feet in
I
he ght.
5 .
Signage will be similar in size and configuration to
th existing sign on Phase I.
6. No residential uses will be placed on the property.
7. Architecture will be compatible with Colonade
Co porate Center.
8. Dumpster location for Phase I to be approved in staff
re iew.
588-5
Petition of M. E. Hinman and Dominion Trust
Company to amend the Roanoke County Future Land
Use Plan from Development to Transition, located
on the north and south sides of Hollins Road
immediately east of Tinker Creek in the Hollins
Magisterial District.
APPROVED
I
Mr. Stalzer reported that this request is a Land Use
796
- --u--Mav-24,--·-19B8----
---'._-- - ..~_..."~_._-~
---~
ii
Ii
ì
I
I
i
_,... .' ,_ ._..._._,.....,......,_ ___.__.___"._.. ..' h~.___·...,.·_.,,"
---....------. --_._~."._.- -.- _..._._._....._.._._._--_.-._---~.._._..,---..._-_..." ,'. ----_._'.....- <
_..._,.._L...___· ._ ..__.. __..'_
Plan Amendment in conjunction with a rezoning request that wa
heard and approved at the April meeting. Approval of this
request will ensure consistency with the Land Use Plan. Ther
were no citizens in opposition at the Planning Commission hea 'ng
and there are no significant impact factors. The Planning
Commission voted unanimous approval.
Supervisor Johnson moved to amend the Land Use Plan.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by e
following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garret
NAYS:
None
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
parcel of land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Ma s
as Parcel 38.16-3-1 and legally described below, be amended i
the Land Use Plan from Development to Transition.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and th t
he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning p
of Roanoke County.
A 3.56 acre parcel of land,
generally located on the north
side of Route 601 east of TInker
Creek within the Hollins
Magisterial District.
1___ --
I
I
May 24, 1988
797
l
588-6
petition of The Roanoke Countv Board of
Su ervis rs and Carson Kin, requesting vacation
of a portion of an existing right-of-way known as
Airpoint Drive for a width of 30 to approximatelY
o feet beginning at Bent Mountain Road (Route 221)
and extending in an easterly direction 365 feet in
the Windsor Hills Magisterial District.
APPROVED
e isting right-of-way is requested so that scheduled J;oad
Mr. Stalzer advised that vacation of a portion of this
i provements to Airpoint Drive can be completed.
The planning
C mmission recommended approval by unanimous vote with one member
tion was seconded by supervisor Robers and carried by the
supervisor Garrett
moved to approve the petition.
The
I
a sent.
ollowing recorded vote:
supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
AYS: None
N RE: PUBLIC HEARINGS AND READING OF ORDINANCES
588-7 Publ ic Hear ing and First Reading of ordinanc
amending the Roanoke County Code to increase th
im osition of the Law Librar fee to support th
Roanoke county/Salem Law Library.
Seco
No one was present to speak to this ordinance.
reading will be June 14, 1988.
supervisor McGraw moved to approve first reading of t e
I
»
---,-
I
I
I
I
¡
,
i
798
. e·_ .~.._ ___. __
AYES:
NAYS:
May 24, 1988
... .._-.-.-.::~~-_-:=~=::: -I::~·:~'
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garre
None
588-8
Public Hearing and Second Reading of ordinance
amending Chapter 9, "Fire Prevention and
Protection" of the Roanoke County Code by
repealing Section 9-2, "Possession, Sale,
Discharge, etc. of Fireworks": the repeal of
Article II, "Fire Lanes"; and the repeal of
Article III, "Fire Protection Code"; and by th
enactment of a new Article II, "Virginia State 'de
Fire Prevention Code," to provide for the
establishment of certain permit and inspection
fees, and to authorize the enforcement of same.
No one was present to speak to this ordinance.
Mahoney pointed out that a public hearing must be scheduled
because this ordinance establishes a fee. The first reading
the ordinance was May 10, 1988.
Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the ordinance. e
motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garret
None
ORDINANCE 52488-13 AMENDING CHAPTER 9, "FIRE
PREVENTION AND PROTECTION," OF THE ROANOKE
COUNTY CODE BY REPEALING SECTION 9-2,
"POSSESSION, SALE, DISCHARGE, ETC. OF FIREWORKS,"
THE REPEAL OF ARTICLE II, "FIRE LANES," AND THE
REPEAL OF ARTICLE III, "FIRE PROTECTION CODE,";
AND BY THE ENACTMENT OF A NEW ARTICLE II,
"VIRGINIA STATEWIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE," TO
PROVIDE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CERTAIN PERMIT
AND INSPECTION FEES, AND TO AUTHORIZE THE
ENFORCEMENT OF SAME.
I
I
-1
799
May 24, 1988
1. That Section 9-2 of the Roanoke County Code,
" ssession, sale, discharge, etc. of fireworks," is hereby
eted and repealed in its entirety.
2. That Article II, "Fire Lanes," of Chapter 9 of the
noke County Code is hereby deleted and repealed in its
en irety.
3. That Article III, "Fire Prevention Code," of Chapter
9 f the Roanoke County Code is hereby deleted and repealed in
entirety.
4 . That a new Article II, "Virginia Statewide Fire
I vention Code," of Chapter 9 of the Roanoke County Code is
he eby amended and re-enacted as follows:
Section 1. That pursuant to the provisions of
Se tion 27-98 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, Roanoke
Co nty shall enforce the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code
as written with amendments. This Statewide Fire Prevention Code
wa adopted by the State Board of Housing and Community
I
De elopment and said Board promulgated certain regulations and
pr cedures to accomplish the adoption and enforcement of this
Co e. The Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code is
in orporated herein by reference as fully as if set out at length
he ein. The regulations set forth herein shall be known as the
Fi e Prevention Code of the County of Roanoke and shall be
re erred to as such or as this Code.
May 24, 1988
-- -------------. -=:-:_-=~-"-- ~:'-==I~=~I'-
80 n
.-. -"...--.- _.'._--,,' ,.~
-
r---
I,
Ii
I
I
I
I
Section 2.
The purposes of this Code are to provi
for statewide standards for local enforcement to safeguard Ii
and property from the hazards of fire or explosion arising
the improper maintenance of life safety and fire prevention a
protection materials, devices, systems, and structures, and t
unsafe storage, handling, and use of substances, materials, a
devices wherever located.
Section 3.
The Roanoke County Fire Marshal is here
directed to enforce the provisions of the Virginia Statewide
Prevention Code and this Code. The County Fire Marshal shall
re
establish such procedures or requirements as may be necessary or
I
the administration and enforcement of said Code. The County re
Marshal is hereby authorized to issue a summons for any viola 'on
of the provisions of the Code, pursuant to the provisions of
Section F-106.8 of said Code. The Fire Marshal shall coordin e
his enforcement activities with the County Building Official
Zoning Administrator. The Fire Marshal shall assign and deta'
such members of the Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department s
inspectors or other assistants as he may deem necessary in
administering and enforcing the provisions of such Code.
Section 4.
There is hereby imposed a Twenty-five
Dollar ($25) fee for all permits issued pursuant to the
provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code.
permit issued shall be by the Office of the Fire Marshal.
d
I
-1
,
80 1
___May 24, 1988
~----~-,--~_.__.__._-,-_._--~----._-.-._~-_._--'-~-
.~-----_._._--..- -----.-----.-..-.-...--.------
I
I
Section 5.
The provisions of this ordinance shall not
b applicable within the limits of the Town of Vinton.
Section 6.
That the Virginia Statewide Fire
P vention Code is hereby amended and changed pursuant to Section
2 97 of the Code of Virginia in the following respects:
1 .
2.
3.
Enforcement officers. Add-the
F-102.1
following at the end of the-existing subsection
F.102.1:
The provisions of the Virqinia Statewide Fire
Prevention Code and this Code shall be enforced bv
the Office of the Fire Marshal, also herein referred
to as the Fire Marshal's Office, the Fire Marshal,
members of the Fire Marshal's staff, the Fire
Prevention Division, or the Fire Official.
F-102.1.1
Inspection bv others.
Add
subsection F-102.1.1 as follows:
The Chief of the Fire Department may desiqnate such
other persons as he deems necessary to make fire
safety inspections. Such persons shall use the
Virqinia Statewide Fire Prevention Code and this
Code as the basis for such inspections.
F-102.1.2
Impersonation.
Add subsection
F-102.1.2 as follows:
802
-.---,.'--- -...- '-"""'--~.>-----
- -Mav·· - 2-4, - -l.9-ª-L_----=;;:,;~~:-=~_-.:~=:.:__~_; :_:=.::=:.::=....:.::.._::....._--==____.
-~. -...---.---.- ,.-
-~----._-~.__._~._-~--
- -
I
I
!
I
!
i
--~- '-,~
.--..-.-'-'.
----,,_.._-_._-- .__._-,--~.-
It shall be unlawful for an unauthorized erson 0
use a bad e uniform or an other credentials so s
to qain access to any buildinq, marine vessel,
vehicle, or premises, or to otherwise falsely
identify himself as the fire official or his
desiqnated representative.
4 .
F-103.4
Investiqation of fires.
Add
subsection F-103.4 as follows:
The Fire Marshal shall investiqate or cause to be
investiqated, every fire or explosion occurrinq
within the Count that is of a sus icious
r
which involves the loss of life or causes
o
persons or causes destruction of or damaqe to
Such investi ation shall be made at th
time of the fire or at a subse uent time de
on the nature and circumstances of the fire. The
Fire Marshal shall take charqe immediately of the
physical evidence and, in order to preserve an v
h sical evidence relatin to the cause or ori in of
such fire or ex losion take means to revent acc ss
bv any person or persons to such buildinq,
structure or remises until such evidence has be n
properly processed.
I
I
_.-- _._-~.,-_.- - ,.-
1
803
May 24, 1988
~----
_._---_.,---_...._~_.._._-----_.-----
---.----.---. ----~.__.._-_.._----_._-------_..._.
I
I
5.
F-103.4.1
Summonsinq the Fire Marshal.
Add
subsection F-103.4.1 as follows:
The fire department officer-in-charqe of any fire,
explosion or incident scene shall immediate Iv
summons the Fire Marshal to such scene to
investiaate the circumstances involved where such
circumstances require investiaation as outlined in
F-103.4 of this Code.
6.
F-103.5
Modifications.
Add the subsection
F-103.5 as follows:
The fire official shall have the power to modifY the
apPlication of this Code, upon written reauest bv
the owner, lessee, occupant or their leqal
reDresentative, when there is practical difficulty
in meetinq the strict letter of the Code. However,
in all cases of modification, the spirit and intent
of the Code shall be met to ensure the health,
safety and welfare of persons is protected.
7 .
F-103.6
Notification of fire deDartment. Add,
subsection F-103.6 as follows:
In any buildinq sublect to inspection under any
provision of this Code, when a fire or evidence of
there havina been a fire discovered, even thouqh it
has aDParentlv been extinquished, it shall be
_..'-'-'"~- .'- ,.-....,
11
I,
I¡
ï
I
I
I
1
804
....... ~___Mªy_ _2-4.,.1.988._._...__
.. . ~_m ^ "'~."'_.'_____ _h..__...
.--.'---.--.--.--------.
__.. __. ._. ____.___ _.. u _____ __._ ~.._
immediately reported to the Chief of the fire
de artment or his desi nee. This shall
of the owner mana n in control of su h
buildin at the time of discover
This re uirem nt
shall not be construed to forbid the owner
r
or erson in control of said buildin from usin II
diliaence necessary to extinquish such fire prior
to the arrival of the fire deDartment.
8.
F-201.0
ApDlied Meanina of Words and Terms:
Add to section F-201.0 the following words, terms
and meanings: II
Fire Lanes: An area
access for and to
si ns in which shall be
on public or Drivate property, to ensure
t
and facilities.
9.
F-303.0
Torches for the Removal of Paint.
Add the following words to the title:
or Sweatinq Pipe Joints.
10. F-303.3
Sweatinq Joints.
Add the following
subsection F-303.3:
Anv person usinq a torch or other flame Droducing
device for sweatinq pipe loints in any buildinq or
II
structure shall have available in the immediate
11.
I
12.
I
l
805
May 24, 1988
vicinity where the sweatina is done one (1) aDDroved
fire extinauisher or water hose connected to a water
supply. Combustible material in close Droximitv to
the work shall be protected aqainst iqnition bv
shieldinq, wettinq or other approved means. In all
cases, a fire watch shall remain in the vicinity of
the sweatinq operation for one-half (1/2) hour after
the torch or flame producinq device has been used.
F-303.3.1 Permit Reauired. Add subsection
F-303.3.1 as follows:
A permit shall be obtained from the fire official
prior to usina a torch or other flame Droducinq
device for sweatina pipe loints in any buildinq or
structure.
F-313.1 Desiqnation. Delete and
substitute as follows:
Phe-eede-eff±e±a~-~ha~~-re~tl±re-and-de~±9na~e
þtlb~±e-er-þr±va~e-f±re-~afte~-a~-deemed-fteee~~ary-fer
~he-eff±e±en~-aftd-effee~±ve-tl~e-ef-f±re-aþþara~tl~~
F±re-~afte~-~ha~~-have-a-m±n±mtlm-w±d~h-ef-~8-fee~
~5486-mmt~
The fire official shall desiqnate fire lanes on
public streets and on private proDertv where
necessary for the purpose of preventina Darkinq in
806
~-~ --.'> ._- #---
_·_',M_,_,_.__
----
r--
I
Ii
11
-!
May 24, 1988
---"'_'"~'...
__ "_.,.,_,__"M... .
_"_,""'U_,_",_,._,-, _
----- -
-~--
- _.. _,._~~_. ,._.__. .~ _M._#
front of or adiacent to fire hYdrants and fire
de artment connections and to ensure access to
buildinas and structures for fire fiqhtina and
rescue a aratus. Fire lanes shall have a minim
width of 18 feet (5486 mm) .
13. F-313.4
Sians and Markinqs.
Add secti n
F-313.4 as follows:
The proDertv owner or desiqnee shall sUDDlv and
install siqns and other required markinqs to
delineate fire lanes as directed bv the fire
official.
14. F-313.5
Specifications.
Add section F-31 .5
as follows:
Fire lanes shall conform to the following
sDecifications:
(A) The desiqn of such siqns shall conform to the
state manual on uniform traffic-control devic s
and shall include the Ian ua e "No Parkin -Fi e
Lane."
(B) Sians desianatinq fire lanes shall be located
so as to provide at least one siqn for every
one hundred (100) feet of fire lane space.
Should the fire marshal determine that
additional siqns are necessary. the owner or
I
I
~
May 24, 1988
8-07
agent of the proDertv shall úrovide the same.
All such sians shall be maintained in úrODer
osition and sufficientl ible to be seen b
an ordinarilY observant úersOn.
(C) Fire lane siqns shall be placed as follows:
(1) Pave edae to sian edqe:
Rural: Not less than 6' nor more than
10'
Urban: Not less than l' nor more than 3' .
(2)
curb face to sian edae:
Rural: Not lesS than l' nor more than 3' .
Urban: Not less than l' nor more than 3' .
I
(3) Pavement toú to sian bottom:
Rural: 5'
Urban: 7'
(4) Curb tOD to sian bottom:
Rural: 5'
Urban: 7 '
(D) Posts for fire lane siqns, where required.
shall be metal and securelY mounted.
(E) The curb or pavement edae of all fire lanes
shall be painted yellow. Anv existinq markinq
in the area desianated as a fire lane shall be
I
-
808
-~
I¡
n
i:
'i
I
¡
.. - MaJ¡- . 24. ,..19-8Z- .. ___.._a__
- - ~--=-==-~:-~:~=~~~~-_.~.~--~~:.:_-~--=~-_.._~~
,-.-
!
_.. -...-.... ,- .........-.- .',.. - --,-..,'.' ---..-
obliterated or painted over in a manner
approved bv the fire marshal.
15. F-313.6
Where fire lanes are desiqnated at
fire hydrant locations.
The followinq shall apply where fire lanes are
established at fire hydrant locations:
(1) Where h drants are located at
curb line or edae of the road and face on a
public street, a public parkinq lot or a
rivate road 0 en to the
wit in
fifteen (15) feet is prohibited.
(2) A special curb markinq desiqnated areas
established pursuant to (1) above, shall be
reauired and shall be yellow.
(3) No plantinq, erection or other obstruction
shall be allowed within four 4 feet of the
fire hydrant.
(4) All hydrants shall be painted in accordance
with standards established b the Fire Mars 1.
5. The provisions of this ordinance shall be effec 've
from and after June 1, 1988.
588-9
Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance
increase the salaries of members of the Board
Supervisors of Roanoke County pursuant to Sect' n
I
I
I
I
809
May 24, 1988
------- -
----
------------
3.07 of the Roanoke County Charter and Section
14.1-46.0-1:1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as
amended.
No one was present to speak to this ordinance. Mr.
Ma oney advised that a public hearing is required to increase the
sa aries of members of the Board of supervisors. The second
re ding will be June 14, 1988.
supervisor McGraw moved to approve first reading of the
inance. The motion was seconded by supervisor Johnson and
cried by the following recorded vote:
s:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens
supervisor Garrett
I
RE:
FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance authorizinq the purchasinq of the residue
Hollow Reservoir: Mr. Mahoney
eported this ordinance will authorize the County to buy the
emainder of the Reynolds tract of 83 acres. Originally 157
cres was purchased and this is the balance of the same property.
o one was present to speak to this ordinance.
supervisor McGraw moved to approve first reading of the
rdinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and
carried by the following recorded vote:
~
b--~: 0 ~
-___-T_d_-
I
I
!
May 24, 1988
>0" ,.'._ _. .".._...~.__._ ...- ~_. ,__......_ '_'. .'. .______,..~._~ __,_______ .. ..._ ,,__,_._,,_ ____.._, ."~ _
-~'---- ...._,-~::=-=t.
I
. _____,_,___ _', - '.,,__._,~ _~'._ - _,,_ _n. ._,_____. _ " .. _ ,. '" .________..~_.
2. Ordinance a
the funds for the 1988
fiscal year budqet for Roanoke Count v: Mr. Mahoney
that this is the second step in the budget process.
afternoon session, the Board adopted the budget. This action
will appropriate the dollars to accomplish the budget. The
second reading will be June 14, 1988. No one was present to
speak to the ordinance.
Supervisor Johnson moved first reading of the
ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garre
I
NAYS:
None
IN RE:
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance amèndinq and readoDtinq Section 12-8,
Ado tion of state law of Article I of Cha ter 12 Motor Vehic s
Mr. Hugh Key, 5355 Black Bear Lane, spoke concernin
at
and Traffic of the Roanoke Count v Code: Mr. Mahoney advised
this ordinance amends the County Code to incorporate by refer ce
the most recent changes of the General Assembly concerning th
Motor Vehicle Code. The first reading was held on May 10, 19
this ordinance. He asked how much revenue the County has los by
not amending the ordinance in 1987. Mr Mahoney responded
I
I
I
~
May 24, 1988
811
Cou t personnel estimated that $10,000 revenue is generated per
mon h. In February 1988, the Sheriff's Department stopped giving
ti ets on this code. Mr. Mahoney estimated approximatelY
$2 ,000 was lost. These funds are going to the State of
Vi ginia.
supervisor Johnson moved to approve the ordinance. The
mo ion was seconded by supervisor Robers and carried by the
f lowing recorded vote:
A S:
supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
N YS:
None
ORDINANCE 52488-11 AMENDING AND
READOPTING SECTION 12-8 OF ARTICLE I OF
CHAPTER 12 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of supervisors of Roanoke
ounty, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Section 12-8, Adontion of ßtate law, Article
, In General, of Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles ~n~ Trpffic, be
mended and readopted to read and provide as follows:
ec. 12-8. Adoption of state law.
pursuant to the authority of section 46.1-188 of the
Code of Virginia, all of the provisions and requirements of the
laws of the state contained in title 46.1 and in article 2
(section 18.2-266 et seq. ) of chapter 7 of title 18.2 of the Code
of Virginia, except those provisions and requirements the
812
May 24, 1988
~c-='-=~~~_~=:=.. I''=-
..- ----- --_... -'-".'- ----.---- - - - ._._-~-_._- ,.---------.-.----. .--_. .__.. _._._---_.._--_.,_._,,~--~-
-.-- ,-'.'.-._...._._.,~.._-,-
-~-----
I
I
I
I
_._~- -- ~.,-'-"--,.._._--,-_..__..^.__... -- _.....~_.,"-~--,~-
violation of which constitutes a felony, and except those
provisions and requirements which, by their very nature, can
no application to or within the county, are hereby adopted an
ve
incorporated in this chapter by reference and made applicable
within the county. References to "highways of the state"
contained in such provisions and requirements hereby adopted
shall be deemed to refer to the streets, highways and other
public ways within the county. Such provisions and requireme s,
as amended from time to time, are hereby adopted and made apt
of this chapter as fully as though set forth at length herein,
and it shall be unlawful for any person within the county to
I
violate or fail, neglect or refuse to comply with any such
provision or requirement; provided, that in no event sha 1 the
penalty impqsed for the-violation of any provision or requi ement
hereby adopted exceed the penalty imposed for a similar
fense
under the state law hereby adopted.
The
hrase "all of the
of
he laws of the
s used here
o
include all amendments to said laws made
date that this ordinance is adopted.
2 .
The effective date of this ordinance sh
I
1 be
May 25, 1988.
---,
813
_ _.._____.__.... .________________.___._._._.__.__________--.Ma
qAA
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
ers and carried by the following recorded vote:
S: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
N S:
None
2. Ordinance amendinq Ordinance No. 2988-6 authorizinq
lease of a roximatel
acres in the Hollins Old
Mo ntain Road area b the Count of Roanoke from In ersoll Rand
fo recreational ur oses: No one was present to speak to this
or inance.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the ordinance. The
II mo ion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the
fo lowing recorded vote:
AY S:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NA S:
None
ORDINANCE 52488-12 AMENDING ORDINANCE
NO. 2988-6 AUTHORIZING THE LEASE OF
APPROXIMATELY FIVE (5) ACRES IN THE
HOLLINS/OLD MOUNTAIN ROAD AREA BY THE
COUNTY OF ROANOKE FROM INGERSOLL RAND
FOR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
Co nty, Virginia, as follows:
1. That at the February 9, 1988, meeting the Board of
Su ervisors authorized the lease of approximately five (5) acres
I
lo ated in the Hollins/Old Mountain Road area from Ingersoll Rand
811\'
--24.--1-9-8-8----
----- --r-------
I !
¡
Ii
I
"~______.__4_· _.
.--.----...---..---- .-
---- . .....-- ~-- . ..~-
for recreational purposes (Ordinance No. 2988-6).
The t rm 0 f
the lease was for a twenty-five (25) year period; and
2. That the Board of Supervisors hereby amends rdin-
ance No. 2988-6 adopted February 9, 1988; and
3. That pursuant to provisions of Section 18.04 f the
Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the
ment of the lease of the hereinafter-described real esta
held on May 10, 1988.
A second reading on this matter wa held
on May 24, 1988 .
This real estate is located in the Holli s/Old
Mountain Road area of Roanoke County; and
I
4. That the lease by Roanoke
County from Ing rsoll
Rand of approximately five (5) acres located in the Holli s/Old
Mountain Road area of Roanoke County for recreational purpo es is
hereby authorized and approved; and
5. That the annual lease amount or rental sh II be
$1.00; and that the term of this lease shall be for a thr e (3)
year renewable term; and
6. That the County Administrator is authorized to
execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roan ke
County as are necessary to accomplish this transaction, all of
which shall be upon form approved by the _County Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote:
I
815
~_.__.__ ________~ ..________.___._______________._._______...._.-Ma
.-----.----" -.---.-.
S: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
N S:
None
IN RE:
CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
The following citizens spoke in opposition to the
pr posed landfill site in Mount Pleasant.
1. John Ferguson, 3868 Pitzer Road, advised there were
19 springs and two branches that lead into Back Creek. This will
af ect pollution in Smith Mountain Lake which could affect
I
to rism.
2. Donna Wood, 3876 Pitzer Road, presented a petition
fr m the Mount Pleasant community requesting a waste-to-energy
so ution to solid waste. They also plan to study recycling.
IN RE:
ADJOURNMENT
At 9:05 P.M., Chairman Garrett declared the meeting
ad ourned.
~~~~
Lee arre t, airman
I