The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About6/14/1988 - Regular I I June 14, 1988 816 _._--.---..--~-~.-.--._._~-'-.---~'--------...-- --->-- Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 June 14, 1988 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke Co nty, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Ad inistration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the fi st regularly scheduled meeting of the month of June 1988. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Garrett called the meeting to order at 3:05 p. . The roll call was taken. Chairman Lee Garrett, Vice Chairman Richard Robers, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Steven A. McGraw, Harry C. Nickens ME BERS PRESENT: ME BERS ABSENT: None ST FF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator for Human Services; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator for Community Services and Development; Don M., Myers, Assistant County Administrator for Management Services; Paul M. Mahoney, I I I I I I I I I I II jI I I ~ 817 L------- .u -- June 14, 1988 ---- 1-~---1- I I -.-. --------~- - ---', -....- "- -. ,"_. ~..~.. ._.__._._- _.'---'-~-- . -, -------,~. County Attorney, Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk; IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by the Reverend Gordon Gri s, Cave Spring Baptist Church. The Pledge of Allegiance was rec by all present. IN RE: JOINT WORK SESSION WITH SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT BOA I Chairman Garrett advised that all members of the Bo d of Supervisors were present. John Parrott, chairman of the id Waste Management Board advised that the representative from Town of Vinton, and one representative from Roanoke County wa absent. Roanoke County representative John Hubbard reported that the Landfill Board met earlier in the day, and a draft letter was prepared which included a commitment to waste-to- energy, host community considerations, a recycling program. Olver and Associates outlined the plans for the rs g procedure, Part "A" application. They will also be doing a waste-to-energy evaluation. Supervisor Johnson asked the of the Landfill Board if they were willing to begin a mandato recycling program. He expressed the desire that this program I I I June 14, 1988 818 ha e a high priority. Mr. Parrott stated they did not have a pr blem with beginning a recycling program. Supervisor Robers pr posed that mandatory recycling of glass, aluminum, and plastic ta e place if the landfill is located in the County. County Administrator Elmer Hodge requested that John 01 er and the consultants study recycling and bring back a report in 30 days. There would be budget implications that would have to be studied. Mr. Kiser, representative from Roanoke City st ted he supported recycling, but the budget implication in each lo ality should be studied. He felt it would take six months for th City of Roanoke to study the issue. Mr. Hodge recommended that the consultants bring back a re 60 days on recycling. Supervisor McGraw requested that th tippage fee be substantially increased. Mr. Parrott ex ressed agreement on that issue. In response to a question fr m Supervisor Garrett, Mr. Olver responded that the first step sh uld be an analysis of the proposed sites. They plan to have th site analysis complete by the end of August. They would be economic analysis at that time. They will begin a study of waste-to-energy and recycling immediately. Supervisor Nickens ad ised he would not support on-site analysis until he has a pu lic commitment from the Landfill Board for a mandatory re ycling program to be instituted by July 1, 1989, a commitment 819 ---_...-.' .-." - '-~'.- -- ---¡:Junp. -1-4 r - 1 g.gg- - _.h._ _.._._ . .,.__._._.__ 0_ __.~. n. _.,. _ _,_."_ il i i I ----- ..-...-..--...---.'"....... ... -.-.- --0 - i -------- I -~.---"-- _..__._~---_._----- to waste-to-energy and a commitment to go forward with anothe member on the Landfill Board. Mr. Hodge stated he felt that the Landfill Board mus begin site inspections for the sake of the neighborhoods. He pointed out it was difficult to find financing for waste-to- energy. He recommended moving forward with right-of-entry. Mr. Olver advised they will bring back a report on recycling in 60 days. Mr. Parrott asked if the City of Sale should be included in any study of recycling. He responded t y have been asked to participate. He suggested that the participating jurisdictions invite the City of Salem to consi r II participation. Mr. Parrott assured the Board of Supervisors at the Landfill Board shared the same goals as they did. IN RE: REQUESTS TO ADD, POSTPONE, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS: Mr. Hodge requested that Approval of the bid for cleanup of Dixie Caverns Landfill be deferred until after Executive Session. He also requested the addition of E-8, Implementation of the Classification Plan and E-9, Authorizati n to proceed with Landfill Siting. IN RE; PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS: I ~ l 820 - 0-_'- ,,'__ _ ___.___, _._ _ __.JJID 1 qRR 1. Announcement of awards received bv the Planninq De artment for the EXPLORE Communi tv Planninq Process: Chairman Ga rett recognized Director of Planning Rob Stalzer and Associate PI nner Liz Parcell for their accomplishment in winning awards fr m the Southwest Virginia Chapter of the American Society for Pu lic Administration and the National Association of Counties fo their EXPLORE Planning Process. Mr. Stalzer acknowledged ot ers who had worked on the process. 2. Certificate of Appreciation to Charlotte Dunston an< the Order of the Eastern Star for contributions to Youth II Ha en II: Chairman Garrett presented the certificate to Mrs. I Du ston for her efforts in obtaining contributions for Youth Ha en II in the amount of $1,773.57 from the state and local ch pters of the Order of the Eastern Star of Virginia. 3. Resolution of Conqratulations to the city of Ro noke for beina selected an All-America City for 1988: Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the prepared re~olution. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and ca ried by the following recorded vote: AYIS: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NA' S: None Kit Kiser, Director of Utilities and Operations was prEsent from the City of Roanoke to accept the resolution from Chc irman Garrett. J 821 --- .~.."... - -."'-"'-' -~- n . --14r ···1988.-. . _ .._.__ ·"_~__·.4_.'__·_·..~ ,._ ----.---.,.-, p. "~.'~"--'-' ,,"_.' .,_._~ ~ II Ii I ! ,. . -. ._------_.. ._~~--~~ RESOLUTION 61488-1 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO THE CITY OF ROANOKE UPON BEING SELECTED AN ALL-AMERICA TY FOR 1988 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROAN OK COUNTY, VIRGINIA AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The City of Roanoke, Virginia has consisten y shown outstanding leadership qualities in its many outstandin endeavors; and WHEREAS, in recognition of this outstanding leadersh' , the City of Roanoke was named an All America City in 1953 and 1982 by the National Civic League, and received the same awar in II 1979 with the other Roanoke Valley localities; and WHEREAS, in recognition of their creative community projects including the Harrison Heritage and Cultural Center, their Comprehensive Plan and a Self Help Program for single mothers, the City of Roanoke has again been selected as an Al America City, one of only ten cities in the United States to receive this honor. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervis s of Roanoke County, Virginia expresses its congratulations to e Mayor, City Council, City Manager, and the employees and citiz ns of Roanoke City on being selected again as an All America Cit for 1988, and I I I l 822 __ _ J..unfLl4, 1988 FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors or Roanoke County wi hes continued success to all those involved in this ou standing accomplishment. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Ni kens, and upon the following recorded vote: AY S: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NA S: None IN RE: NEW BUSINESS 1. Establishment of a Joint Risk Manaqement Section for th School and count 0 erations: Director of Finance, Diane Hy tt reported that on April 20, 1988, consolidation of services be ween the Schools and County was discussed at a work session. Ri k Management was one of those areas identified for study. The Co nty staff feels that the combination of property, casualty, an liability and fidelity insurance policies of the County and Sc ools should be monitored by a risk manager. County staff has me with the schools and proposed a policy statement es ablishing an area of risk management. Health Insurance and wo kers compensation will continue to be handled by the De artment of Human Resources. It is estimated that $100,000 wi I be saved by combining these areas under risk management. 823 --,"-~~---- -,- -_. '. -. --·.---June· --l-4T- .1-9-&-ß..-..... . . >-.--- -~.__._"-~- '.,-'~- -_.~- ........=1....... .--- --_. _. .0' '__'._._... ]_..._.. .0..... .o. .._.... After staffing this area, approxîmately $60,000 savings will realized. Supervisors Robers and Johnson asked why health insurance and workers compensation would not be part of this program. Mr. Hodge responded that he would prefer that these insurances continue to be part of Human Resources because it' a I personnel function. Ms. Hyatt added that the Risk Manager wo d be reviewing the health insurance proposals. Supervisor Nickens recommended that the County wait hire a Risk Manager until the contracts are studied and the savings determined. Mr. Hodge responded that the contracts h e already been studied for savings and it will be necessary to ve a full-time person. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the staff recommendation, combining the Risk Management operations for e County and schools and establishment of the Risk Management Section and Risk Manager. The motion was seconded by Supervi r McGraw. Supervisor Nickens offered a substitute motion to approve the staff recommendation with the exception that the sk Manager be hired for one year subject to review by the govern g body. Supervisor Johnson withdrew his motion and seconded Supervisor Nicken's motion. The motion carried by the follow' g AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett I recorded vote: 824 LTl1np 1. NA S: None 2. Reauest from the Industrial Development Authoritv fo issuance of IDA Bonds for Hollins ColI e: Economic De elopment Director Tim Gubala advised that in August 1987, Ho lins College had requested $3,500,000 from the Industrial De elopment Authority for financing to construct a new gymnasium. Si ce that time, they have reevaluated the project and decided th t they can construct both the new facility and renovate the ol gymnasium for $3,000,000. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the prepared II re olution. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and ca ried by the following recorded vote: I AY S: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NA S: None RESOLUTION 61488-3 OF APPROVAL FOR ISSUANCE OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BONDS FOR HOLLINS COLLEGE WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of Ro County, Virginia (the Authority) has considered the bo in the financing of (1) the construction of a ap lication of Hollins College Corporation (the College) re uesting the issuance of one or more of the Authority's revenue gy nasium of approximately 19,000 square feet (which will be lo ated on the College's campus, adjacent to and connecting with , I I~ 825 June 14, 1988 ---.-----.--...-- ... .--", --,-_.'._- . I r--- ~_o . ,..~--_.,,_.._,._.,_._._. .-.----..-..-..,... --..--.-.--.-.,.-..-.--". -..--..-. -'._'-~' --.,-." --- --'-'.-"~-'- -_.,~.~ _,____ _·__·_________··__·~_'<,..M_.·· ._.__.__ ._ _.__._____~,__.'., '.'_""'_ r-- Ij II 'I I! - -.-,'-.., - _.~- the College's present indoor swimming facility, in Roanoke Co Virginia) and (2) renovating the College's existing gymnasium (collectively, the Project) will be owned and operated by the College,and has held a public hearing thereon; and WHEREAS, it has been requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia (the Board) approve t financing of the Project and the issuance of the Bonds, and s h approval is required for compliance with Section 147 (f) of t Internal Revenue Code of 1986. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANO COUNTY, VIRGINIA: ty 1. The Board approves the financing of the Project nd the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority for the benefit of he College, as required by said Section 147(f), to permit the Authority to assist in the financing of the Project. 2. The approval of the issuance of the Bonds, as required by said Section 147(f), does not constitute an endorsement of the Bonds or the credit worthiness of the ColI e or otherwise indicate that the Project possesses any economic viability. The Bonds shall provide that neither the Commonwe th of Virginia (the Commonwealth) nor any pOlitical subdivision thereof, including Roanoke County (the County) and the Authori y, shall be obligated to pay the principal of or interest on the Bonds or other costs incident thereto except from the revenues I I 1 826 June 14, 1988 ...."_.-._.._---------_._,------,--_.__._._._-----~------------_._---- --------.., ---~ ---"---.' - receipts pledged therefor and that neither the faith or dit nor the taxing power of the Commonwealth or any political division thereof, including the County and the Authority, sh II be pledged thereto. 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately kens S: NA S: I 3 . 19 8 89: its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor and carried by the following recorded vote: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett None Allocation of Human Services Fundinq for fiscal year Director of Management and Budget Reta Busher reported th t with the dissolution of the Human Services Committee, the inistrative staff allocated the $20,000 budgeted for the ious human services agencies. Staff is recommending that the ,000 appropriation be allocated exactly as was allocated in 1987-88 budget. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the staff re ommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and ca ried by the following recorded vote: AY S: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NA S: None I 4. Recommendation for Fundinq of Cultural Enrichment Or anizations: Ms. Busher advised there was $20,000 budgeted for 827 June 14, 1988 ._-.~--,- ~ - . -,-".._.-- .,-, - . _... . '~'~"""',-,... .., .,.-... ---.-.--.. ,--..,- _.._-- - -_._---,,-_. ~, ._.~-_._..~---- Roanoke Valley Cultural Enrichment Organizations. In additi the County applied for and received a Local Government Challe e Grant from the Commission for the Arts which will match the $5,000 monies given by localities to arts organizations. Thi will bring the total contributions from Roanoke County to $25, 00. Staff recommends that the County accept the grant and allocat the total funding as follows: $5,000 to the Arts Council of Roanoke Valley, $15,000 to Center in the Square, and $5,000 the Roanoke Symphony which is the same as last year with the exception of the $5,000. Supervisor Robers moved to approve staff recommenda 'on. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by e following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett NAYS: Supervisor Nickens 5. Awardinq of bid for employee health insurance: Director of Human Resources Keith Cook reported that the Bid Committee received four proposals for health coverage and two or dental insurance. The proposals were narrowed down to two bi Blue Cross-Blue Shield and American General, and the County i recommending award of the contract to American General Group Insurance Company. They further recommend that the County's allocation of $42.00 be limited to health insurance coverage which would bring $50,000 into the health insurance budget. ~ , I I I I l 828 June 14, 19RR Supervisor McGraw and Supervisor Johnson expressed co cern at choosing a company that the employees and medical ilities were not familiar with, due to similar problems in the t. Mr. Cook responded that both companies offered the same erages, but the main difference was the Blue Cross name ognition. Supervisor Robers pointed out that there was a ge difference in the unfunded balance between the Blue Cross gram and the American General program. He suggested raising th deductibles. In response to a question from Supervisor Ni kens, Mr. Hodge advised that in order to keep the rates qu ted in the recommendation, the $42.00 used by those employees fo a medical insurance plan other than the health insurance must be included. Otherwise, the rates will increase. Supervisor Johnson moved to reject the staff re ommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and ca ried by the following recorded vote: AY S: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NA S: Supervisor Robers Supervisor McGraw suggested describing the two plans to employees and getting input from them. Mr. Hodge responded th t the contract expires at the end of June and there was not for responses from the employees. Supervisor Nickens moved to award the bid to Blue Cr ss-Blue Shield lower payment plan and that alternate insurance 829 - -'-'-.- -- -. ···--·_~June-·nl4-r--l~-8--·- . ..-- - .._.'_."--'--'--'-_.~-'." . -.-,....- "- .~ ._-~-_._.--_.---_._-~-~.~".~"".~..~.~.'---~--_._,--_..~~-----.. r I. ., :¡ I· I Ii I I . ~ - ._,~_.- . .._.... continue to be available to those employees not participating, and that premiums paid by employees be revised to reflect the increase as a result of continuing the alternate insurance. e motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: Supervisor Robers Supervisor Nickens requested that the County Administrator bring back a recommendation on health insurance 0 later than June 1, 1989 for the next fiscal year budget. 6. Implementation of the Classification Plan for Fiscal Year 1988-89: Mr. Hodge reported that during implementation of the classification plan, there were people 0 I I I I is recommending that employees move to the minimum step at were below minimum step. The original plan was to move them the minimum step. The outcome was that shorter service emplo es could move to a higher step with a higher salary than those w have been employed with the County for several years. The st f anniversary date, and that employees hired after July 1 will hired one step below the A step of the classification plan. Supervisor Garrett moved to authorize the County Administrator to implement the pay plan as outlined. The mot' n died because there was no second. I r I 830 l _ June I I -----_._------ ---- Supervisor Nickens suggested that the item be deferred un il all board members were present. 7. Approval of fundinq to convert County street liqhts to Hi h Pressure Sodium: Director of Engineering Phillip Henry ex lained that during the past year staff has had discussions wi h Appalachian concerning conversion of street lights. The la est rate negotiations for electrical power also resulted in sa ings and it was a good time to use the savings to convert to hi h pressure sodium which is more efficient. The staff is re ommending utilization of the remaining funds in this year's bu get and next year's budget, to pay for the majority of the co version. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve staff re ommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and ca ried by the following recorded vote: AY S: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NA S: None 8. Authorization to Proceed with Landfill Sitinq Mr Hodge recommended that the Board authorize the right of entry fo the proposed landfill sites. He explained that the ap lication will be a lengthy process and should begin. He felt th residents in the neighborhoods should know whether the pr posed sites will meet the criteria. He also recommended that wi hin the next 60 to 90 days that the County go forward with 831 ,-..' .-'-..,-..----. ·~-·June ..-14 r.-19aa.-- --.'-..'-"---',.'.'..-.--...'--'- .. ~ ._------- _..._--~-_. -"-r---' I' II I I I I their other requests that Roanoke City and the Town of Vinton notified of the neighborhood considerations required for the w sites, that the Landfill Board continue researching waste to energy and recycling; and that the host locality have another member on the Landfill Board. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion seconded by Supervisor Garrett. II .1 Supervisor Nickens made a substitute motion that th issue be tabled until the Landfill Board receives from Olver e Associates the report on recycling. The motion was seconded Supervisor Robers. II The substitute motion carried by the following reco ed vote: AYES: Supervisors Robers, McGraw, Nickens NAYS: Supervisors Johnson, Garrett IN RE: REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS Supervisor McGraw moved to set a public hearing for July 26, 1988 to consider the views of the citizens of Roanok County on the issue of whether or not to adopt a resolution requesting the circuit court to schedule a referendum for November 8, 1988, on changing the method of appointment of members of the Roanoke County School Board from the Roanoke II I I 832 Co nty School Board selection Commission to the Roanoke County BO rd of Supervisors. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and ca ried by the following recorded vote: AY S: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett NA S: Supervisor Nickens IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amendinq Chapter 2, Article II, Pr curement Practices Concernin the Purchasin A ent and small u chases: County Attorney Paul Mahoney advised this ordinance wo Id consolidate the purchasing of schools and administration. No one was present to speak to the ordinance. Supervisor Johnson moved first reading of the or inance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and ca by the following recorded vote: AY Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NA S: None 2. Ordinance establishinq Premium Refuse Collection an establishin fees: Mr. Mahoney explained that there will be a ublic hearing on June 28th because there will be an increase of fees. No one was present to speak to the ordinance. l --T I i I ! , 833 --.,"..----. '-'-'-~- -----------...:¡uRe---l4r-1988 -'--_.__..~.- ---.---.------ .. -., ------., ___·_.____.__n"._~__n'_'._.._~_n._____·.____.__.__..__.__"'."", ....,_ ,,'__,_.. ,. '~_~_~_."p'_' ,....._._., --- d_.. _._------- I. I Supervisor Garrett moved to approve first reading 0 carried by the following recorded vote: the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garre NAYS: None 3. Ordinance an offer for and authorizin the conveyance of a riqht-of-wav and easement to Appalachian Power Company: This will grant an easement to serve the Roan e I . County Public Safety Building. No one was present to speak t the ordinance. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve first reading 0 the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garre NAYS: None 4. Ordinance an offer f the sale of sur Ius real estate - a well lot located in Hills: Mr. Mahoney advised the County has received an offer acquire a surplus well lot for $100. No one was present to sp k to the ordinance. d I d Supervisor Nickens asked about the size of the lot, nd why the price was less than other well lots that have been so II I II i¡ Mr. Mahoney did not have the information. I ~ 834 June 14, 1988 Supervisor Nickens moved to continue this ordinance to Ju e 28th so that all information will be available. The motion wa seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following re orded vote: AY S: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NA S: None 5. Ordinance authorizinq the lease Durchase of certain e i ment: This will authorize the lease-purchase of the em rgency communication equipment. Mr. Mahoney requested that th second reading of the ordinance be dispensed with because of II th time constraints to accept the offers from the leasing ag ncies. Director of Finance Diane Hyatt explained that this co ers four items that were merged to get the best financing. Th re were ten bids and the interest expenses was considerably Ie s by combining the items. No one was present to speak to the or inance. Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the ordinance and to dispense with the second reading. The motion was seconded by Su ervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AY S: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NA S: None I ORDINANCE 61488-9 AUTHORIZING THE SALE AND LEASE PURCHASE OF CERTAIN EQUIPMENT. 835 . -.June.14- ~ --1~88-- -. .-.._-..__.-. -- _.,-. ," .-.--.. -. -, _..- -'-~~---'-"' --,........... --'.-..-. . - '[ I I I ! - - -., .- ._-, ._-. -. --....-.-..-...--.-.-.-.. The Board of Supervisors r ---- u_ --- ("Board") of the Cou ty of Virginia ("County") has determined that it is Roanoke, desirable to enter into a lease purchase transaction to fin nce a portion of the cost in the amount of approximately $1,550, 00 of certain public safety radio system equipment ("Equipment"). The Board proposes to sell the Equipment to the Lessor whose p posal is accepted by this Ordinance ("Lessor" ) pursuant to a B II of Sale ( "Bill of Sale" ) from the County to the Lessor and to lease the Equipment from the Lessor pursuant to a Lease Pu chase Agreement (" Lease Purchase Agreement") from the Lessor 0 the County. I NOW, THEREFORE, BE I T ORDAINED BY THE BO D OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA: 1. This Ordinance shall be adopted as an em gency measure, and the second reading of this Ordinance is dispensed with in accordance with Section 18.04 of the County Charter. ereby anoke 2 . The Board hereby determines that it is n the be st interest of the County to accept the proposal ("Pro sal") of GE Capital Fleet Services, o the I Inc., to serve as Lessor und r the Lease Purchase Agreement. The sale of the Equipment I 836 sor pursuant to ipment from the eement upon the ap roved. the Bill of Sale and the lease of the Lessor pursuant to the Lease Purchase terms set forth in the Proposal are hereby 3. The Bill of Sale and the Lease Purchase eement are hereby approved in substant i ally the forms to thi s meet ing , with such changes, insertions, or ssions (including, without limitation, changes of the dates as may be approved by the Chairman or the Vice Chairman the Board, whose approval shall be evidence conclusively by execution and delivery of such documents. 4 . The Chairman and Treasurer are each hereby au horized and directed to execute and deliver the Bill of Sale an the Lease Purchase Agreement and, if required the Deputy CI rk of the Board is authorized and directed to affix or cause to be affixed the seal of the Board to such documents and to at est such seal. Each officer or agent of the County is au horized to execute and deliver on behalf of the County such in truments, documents or certificates, and to do and perform su h things and acts, as they shall deem necessary or appropriate I to carry out the transactions authorized by this Ordinance or co templated by the transactions authorized by this Ordinance or 837 _~__V·," ~._.,_ ... -- -···::Jlffie- -'±4-, 1 9 8 8 - ._---_._~._"-----_._-_.__. _.. -- -- --.-.'.------.,...- ----·--r·-· I: il i I I I I "-- ...-..--- ---.--,..-- --~--~ contemplated by the Bill of Sale, Lease Purchase Agreement Proposal, and all of the foregoing, previously done or pe by such officers or agents of the County, are in all r approved, ratified, and confirmed. r the ormed pects 5. The Board determines that sale of the Eq . pment to the Lessor pursuant to the Bill of Sale and the lease f the ! I Equipment to the County in accordance with the terms of the Lease Purchase Agreement and the Proposal and all actions of the ounty contemplated thereunder, will be in furtherance of the welf re of I the citizens of the County and will provide facilities whi hare essential and necessary to the operations of the County. 6. Nothing in this Ordinance or the Lease P chase Agreement or any documents in connection with the trans tions contemplated by the Ordinance or the Lease Purchase Ag ement shall consti tute a pledge of the full faith and credit County beyond the constitutionally permitted appropriations. I ! I I II ! ! 7 . The appropriate officers and agents the County are hereby authorized and directed to execute Non- I Arbitrage Certificate and Tax Covenants setting for the expected use of the proceeds from the sale of the Equipme t and I I -, 888 ____________________________.__________June 14, 1988 taining such covenants as may be necessary in order to show pliance with the provisions of Section 148 of the Internal enue Code of 1986, as amended, and applicable regulations re ating to "arbitrage bonds. " The Board of Supervisors of the Co nty covenants as behalf of the County that such proceeds will be invested and expended as set forth in such Non-Arbitrage Ce tificate and Tax Covenants and that the County shall comply wi h the other covenants and representations contained therein. 8. The officers and agents of the County are hereby au horized and directed to take such further action as they deem ne essary regarding the transactions contemplated by the Lease Pu chase Agreement and all actions taken by such officers and ag nts in connection therewith are hereby ratified and confirmed. 9. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately. The undersigned Deputy Clerk of the Board of ervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that foregoing consti tutes a true and correct extract from the utes of a meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke Co nty, Virginia, held on the 14th day of June, 1988, and of the wh Ie thereof so far as applicable to the matters referred to in su h extract. 839 . -- .--.-..-.. -June----14..,....l9.ß8 . . ---:- ~- -=-~~:~~-==:~::~f~~-- :-~- WITNESS Supervisors of the 1988. MY HAND and the seal of the Boa d of County of Roanoke, this 16th day of June, On mot ion of Supervisor Garrett to approve or . nance and dispense with second reading, seconded by Supervisor . ckens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Gar tt NAYS: None I 6. Ordinance authorizin the conve ance of real estate for economic Mr. Mahoney reported this ordinance authorizes the conveya ce of residual parcels of real estate left over after constructi nand dedication of the industrial access road. The agreemen will allow Lingerfelt Development Corporation to acquire the p perty for $32,000. The money will be allocated to the capital f ility account. No one was present to speak to the ordinance. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve first read ng of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garre t and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None I I I 1 June 14, 1988 840 supervisor McGraw IN SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance to increase the salaries of members of th Board of Su ervisors of Roanoke Count ursuant to section 3. 7 of the Roanoke Count Charter and section 4.1-46.0-1:1 of 1950 Code of Vir inia as amended: supervisor McGraw moved to approve the ordinance. was seconded by supervisor Johnson and carried by the llowing recorded vote: supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens supervisor Garrett ORDINANCE 61488-10 TO INCREASE THE SALARIES OF MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.07 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CHARTER AND SECTION l4.l-46.01:1 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, Section 3.07 of the Charter for the County f Roanoke provides for the compensation of members of the board of supervisors and the procedure for increasing their salaries; and WHEREAS, section 14.1-46.01:1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, establishes the annual salaries of members of boards of supervisors within certain population brackets; and 841 June 14, 1988 ..,.,...~-,,--_..,_.._._.- - ___..ø_.__w._.___.._..___. ~7._,,__·...,"~""_""~' ,..__ "._ . --.."---. _..._---,~ _."-,._._.,.~--------_.__.- - ---II I II I i I WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke Count , Virginia, has heretofore established the annual salaries of Bo rd members to be $7,987 by Ordinance No. 6987-7, and further, has established the additional annual compensation for the Chairma of the Board to be $1,800 and for the Vice Chairman of the Boa d to be $1,200; and WHEREAS, this section provides that the maximum annual salaries therein provided may be adjusted in any year b an inflation factor not to exceed five (5%) percent; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on the establishment of WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was h Id I these salaries was held on May 24, 1988; and on May 24, 1988; the second reading was held on June 14, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the annual salar es of members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, are hereby increased by an inflation factor of five (5%) percent pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.07 of the Roanoke County Charter and Section 14.1-46.01:1 of the 1950 Co e of Virginia, as amended. The new annual salaries shall be $8, for members of the Board. In addition, the Chairman of the Bo will receive an additional annual sum of $1,800 and the Vice Chairman of the Board will receive an additional sum of $1,200 I This ordinance shall take effect on July 1, 1988. 842 ______._____________________________.______;June 14 , ------------- 2. Ordinance amendinq the Roanoke County Code to i rease the im90sition of the Law Librarv fee to sUDDort the t T N S: I noke Count Salem Law Librar No one was present to speak to ordinance. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the ordinance. motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the lowing recorded vote: S: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett None ORDINANCE 61488-11 AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO AUTHORIZE THE INCREASE OF THE LAW LIBRARY FEE TO SUPPORT THE ROANOKE COUNTY/SALEM LAW LIBRARY WHEREAS, by Ordinance adopted March 12, 1985, the Bo rd of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, imposed an as essment for law libraries as part of the costs incident to h civil action filed in the courts within its boundaries in amount of $2.00; and WHEREAS, Section 42.1-70 of the 1950 Code of Virginia wa amended during the 1988 session of the Virginia General As embly authorizing an increase of this fee to $4.00 per civil ca e filed with the clerks of the various courts to pay the costs of maintenance, upkeep, and improvements of the law library; and I WHEREAS, the $4.00 filing fee assessed against r I ¡ 843 June _l~ 1 qRR . .... - ,. .-- ..__. parties filing civil cases is equitable and just in that it places the cost of maintaining the law library upon those who precipitate litigation; and 1" WHEREAS, the first reading and public hearing on t is ordinance was held on May 24, 1988; the second reading of this ordinance was held on June 14, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of II Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this ordinance amends and reenacts the ordinance adopted on March 12, 1985, and pursuant to the authority found in Section 42.1-70 of the 1950 Code of Virgini , II as amended, increases the assessment as part of the costs incident to each civil action filed in the courts serving Roan ke County from the sum of Two Dollars ($2.00) to the sum of Four Dollars ($4.00). This assessment and these funds shall be expended or the purposes as provided in said statute, specifically, for th acquisition of law books, law periodicals, and computer legal research services and equipment for the establishment, use, an maintenance of the law library which shall be open for the use the public. In addition, disbursements may include compensati to be paid to librarians and other necessary staff for the maintenance of such library. I I I 844 l _ ,.._.' ø_ __._ __JJ.Ule 14, 1 988 - _. ...- -- .- This assessment shall be in addition to other costs scribed by law, but shall not apply to any action in which the monwealth, any political subdivision, or the federal ernment is a party, and in which costs are assessed against County, any political subdivision, or the federal government. 2. That the Treasurer of Roanoke County is au horized to receive the funds for the maintenance, upkeep, and im rovements of the law library from the clerks of the various co rts, and from the Treasurer of the City of Salem, and disburse sa d funds for the maintenance, upkeep, and improvement of said la library on a regular basis to those persons designated by the ch ef judge of the circuit court responsible for the a inistration of said law library. 3. That the provisions of this ordinance shall take ef ect on July 1, 1988. 4. That a certified copy of this ordinance be fo warded to the chief judges and clerks of the courts serving Ro noke County, the Treasurer of Roanoke County, the Treasurer of th City of Salem, and the Roanoke County/Salem Bar Association. 3 . Ordinance authorizinq the purchase of the residue Hollow reservoir: No one was present of Re nolds Pro to speak to the ordinance. 845 June 14, 1988 ----,----_.', _._~.-._- .-..._..."'---_...--~._.. ~--_.- II I I I -_. _. - ~, . _... - ,~."_.- - . - '-'- . ._,.__.._.~.,._.._.. Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by t e following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors JOhnson, RObers, McGraw, Nickens, Garr tt NAYS: None ORDINANCE 61488-12 AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF T E REMAINDER OF THE REYNOLDS PROPERTY/ SPRING HOLLO RESERVOIR County, Virginia, as follows: I BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roan ke 1. That pursuant to provisions of Section 18.04 0 the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the acquisition of the hereinafter-described real estate was held 0 May 24, 1988. A second reading on this matter was held on June 14, 1988. This real estate consists of 83 acres, more particularly described as Roanoke County Tax Map No. 72.00-1-1, west of Salem adjacent to the property owned by Roanoke County s the future location of Spring Hollow Reservoir; and 2. That the acquisition of 83 acres of real estate from Harold D. Reynolds, et al., to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County for $40,000 is hereby authorized and approved; a I 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roano County as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of this I I 846 J pr perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County At orney. 4. Ordinance appropriatinq the funds for the 1988/89 fi cal inia: Mr. Mahoney et for Roanoke Count po nted out a correction in the ordinances concerning dates. No on was present to speak to the ordinance. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the ordinance and co rected. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and ca ried by the following recorded vote: AY S: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NA S: None ORDINANCE 61488-13 APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE 1988-89 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, upon notice duly published in the newspaper, a ublic hearing was held on April 26, 1988, concerning the ad ption of the annual budget for Roanoke County for fiscal year 19 8-1989; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Vi ginia, approved said budget on May 24, 1988, pursuant to the pr visions of Section 13.02 of the Roanoke County Charter and Ch pter 4 of Title 15.1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; an 847 . .... .. '!1.1_~~ .~~.! __ ~.9 88 _"__~'__'__'_"__'__ _,___',·_ø_. n .' '_____.-_.._..____ , ----~_._- --r--- I I I I WHEREAS, the first reading of this appropriation ordinance was held on May 24, 1988, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on June 14, 1988, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roan ke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the following appropriations are hereby m de from the respective funds for the period beginning July 1, 198 , and ending June 30, 1989, for the functions and purposes indicated: 2. That the County Administrator may authorize th transfer of any unencumbered balance or portion thereof from 0 classification of expenditure to another within the same department or agency. That the County Administrator may trans r up to $10,000 from the unencumbered balance of the appropriatio of one department or agency to another department or agency, including the contingency account encompassed in the Non- Departmental appropriation. 3. That all funded outstanding encumbrances, both operating and capital, at June 30, 1988, are reappropriated to the 1988-89 fiscal year to the same department and account for which they are encumbered in the previous year. 4. That appropriations designated for capital projects will not lapse at the end of the fiscal year but shall I I June 14, 1988 848 re ain appropriated until the completion of the project or until th Board of Supervisors, by appropriate action, changes or el minates the appropriation. Upon completion of a capital pr ject, staff tr nsfer to the se tion applies is authorized to close out the project and funding source any remaining balances. This to appropriations for Capital Projects at June 30 1988, and appropriations in the 1988-89 budget. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Su ervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AY S: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett I NA S: None -----.-----..--.------ ------------------------------------------------------------ PERSONNEL OPERATING CAPITAL TRANSFERS TOTAL ------------------------------------------------------------ EXPENDITURES: GENERAL FUND BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 93,472 70,898 875 165,245 CO ADMINISTRATOR ADMINISTRATION 126,306 14,155 140,461 INFORMATION & REFERRAL HUMAN RESOURCES ADMINISTRATION 146,654 28,807 1,455 176,916 EMPLOYEE RELATIONS 26;899 26,899 TRAINING COUNTY ATTORNEY 179,958 25,679 5,060 (37,143) 173,554 SESQUICENTENNIAL 31,542 25,000 56,542 I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 117,582 108,626 226,208 TREASURER 250,887 167,006 585 40,963 459,441 COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY 270,389 17,400 800 288,589 VICTIM/WITNESS 5,000 5,000 COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE ADMINISTRATION 83,967 3,125 87,092 REAL ESTATE 65,413 12,379 77 , 792 849 June 14, 1988 " -'."~'-- -_._-<- - . - ---~ ~ ".. ,-....-.. -."-'. - -_._--- ._,--'.,._--_.. - - - --~-- ..---",-.--.- ..-,------........---.".,. -"'--'._-'~..._~--. ..'-'- -H "'_ - ._._~__~." -"-""-'_0 "~'---."-- -~. ,.-.",.,-.-.".----- ---.--------...------ - .--~ 70,333 210,973 PERSONAL PROPERTY . 140,64.0 I BUSINESS LICE~SE 69,684 41, 172 110,856 I CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT PUBLIC RECORDS 324,202 82,915 925 ~08,042 I MICROFILM 39,818 38,4.42 78,2.60 POLICING AND INVESTIGATING ADM I N I STP.A TI ON 144,675 38,700 163,375 CIVIL DIVISION 569,059 53,150 1,355 623,564' U~IFORM DIVISION 1,269,347 247,162 162,131 ~,&n,640 CRIMINAL INVEST DIVISION 513,970 79,088 1, 950 595,008 SERVICES DIVISION 772,470 103,465 650 876,585 TRANSPORTATION SAFETY COMMISSION 960 960 CARE & COHFINEMENT OF PRISONERS 1,565,062 319,762 1, 884,824 CIRCUIT COURT 7,125 92,514 99,639 GENERAL DISTRICT COURT 150 14,560 4,030 18,740 MAGISTRATE 730 730 J & D RELATIONS COURT 8,621 8,621 PROBATION 37,730 1,445 39,175 ASST COUNTY ADMIN-MGT SERVICES COUHTY ASSESSOR ADMINISTRATION 183,532 37,567 175 221,274 REASSESS~ENT 310,047 45,122 31,230 386,399 I BOARD OF EOUILIZATION 10,949 10,949 FINANCIAL PLANNING -"------- ---------- CE~TRAL ACCOU~TING 198,856 90,496 289,352 PAYROLL 50,647 14,570 1, 570 66,787 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 60,000 60,000 MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET 71,613 16,640 88,253 RISK MANAGEMENT 1,108,380 1,108,380 PROCUREMENT SERVICES 167,690 40,091 100 207,881 FIRE AD~INISTRATION 66,397 39,225 105,622 FIRE SUPPRESSION 726,203 253,578 333,500 104,781 1,418,062 FIRE PREVENTION 90,435 6,800 .11,800 109,035 TRAINING 29,692 38,105 9,700 77 A97 TECHNICAL SERVICES 55,532 148,356 - 2,500 206,388 PLANNING AND RESEARCH 33,088 2,455 35,543 RESCUE SQUAD OPERATIONS 235,638 49,010 284,648 EMS SERVICES 190,698 9,075 199,773 EMERGENCY SERVICES PLANNING AND OPERATIONS 22,272 4,500 26,772 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 17,420 1,000 18,~2.0 I ASST CO ADMIN-COMMUNITY SVCS MANAGEMENT 101, 602 20,604 200 <18,200) 104,206 SOLID WASTE 793,746 482,854 288,741 97,971 1,663,312 STREET LIGHTING 96,116 96,116 .,..._"_ .J:..~J.._~"''i....;¡,u~___;''+._.".__ . -_._--------~ June 14, 1988 850 ---- --- -- -- - - -- --- --- - -~------------ -----_.-._--------- ENGINEERING -.- -----'.- ENGINEERING 202,785 18,732 12,750 (92,918) 141, 349 DRAFTING & RECORDS 68,828 8,064 (37,864) 39,028 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION 104,796 11,124 15,000 (54,980) 75,940 DRAINAGE 46,431 30,650 122,919 200,000 ROADWAY 40,025 4,700 44,725 BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 410,271 528,926 24,075 963,272 PLANNING & ZONING ADMINISTRATION 89,225 36,503 175 125,903 CURRENT PLANNING AND OPER 94,864 3,250 98,114 SPECIAL PROJECTS 33,754 1,500 35,254 ZONING ORDINANCE 23,000 23,000 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PERMITS 62,016 2,085 64,101 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 43,927 1,400 45,327 PLANNING COMMISSION 15,233 2,700 17,933 CONSTRUCTION BUILDING SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 37,763 7,000 44,763 INSPECTIONS 141,189 21,753 162,942 I ASST CO ADMIN-HUMAN SERVICES 80,825 22,055 102,880 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 574,565 233,764 19,000 827,329 LEAF COLLECTION 26,150 26,150 STREET SIGHS 4,200 4,200 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMUNITY EDUCATION 54,796 1,500 56,296 LEISURE ACTIVITIES 91,660 1,000 92,660 OUTDOOR ADVENTURE 26,549 3,500 30,049 SENIO:? CITE~:iS 18,292 3,850 82,142 - --------..---- ~-- --- SPECIAL EVENTS 54,544 5,193 59,737 THERAPEUTICS 97,454 19,100 116,554 ADULT ATHLETICS 56,892 4,000 60,892 YOUTH ATHLETICS 137,948 10,000 147,948 ADMINISTRATION 197,842 81,409 14,660 293,911 PUBLIC HEALTH 397,370 397,370 SOCIAL SEVICES ADMINISTRATION 1,522,569 251,143 17,445 1,791,157 PUBLIC ASSISTANCE 802,285 802,285 INSTITUTIONAL CARE 36,000 36,000 SOCIAL SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS 94,984 94,984 CONTRIBUTIONS SVC ORGANIZATIONS 20,000 20,000 I LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION 101,349 595 850 102,7"4 RESEARCH AND CIRCULATION 628,000 282,737 450 911,187 GENERAL MAINTENANCE 70,400 70,400 JOINT BOTETOURT/RKE CNTY LIB 23,833 24,225 500 48,558 EXTENSION & CONTINUING EDUCATION 83,356 5,170 7,800 96,326 851 June 14, 1988 3,029,967 1,646,575 816,699 26,666,000 75,768 325,942 40,000 119,621 46,991 145,638 677, 392 790,343 3,029,967. 1,646,575 , 816,699 26,666,000 75,768 325,942 ?O,OOO 50,000 -_. - '"' -,....----. ._- .___" _u_~._·.__~.·.'_._~,. .'. ._ _.,. _ _, ._ ,_. .,_r_ ..~.... _n._ _, _~ . '-' -" --"'-"'--'-"-,-_.,""-'---~ ---~~ECTI~NS- I REGISTRATION ¡ ELECTIONS I ANIMAL CONTROL ! EMPLOYEE BENEFITS MISCELLANEOUS TRANS TO DEBT-GENERAL TRANS TO DEBT SERVICE-SCHOOL TRANSFER TO CAPITAL TRANSFER TO SCHOOLS TRANSFER TO YOUTH HAVEN II TRANSFER TO INTERNAL SERVICE TRANSFER TO UTILITY CAPITAL CONTINGENT BALANCE -- - - ---- -~-- 0- . _,__.__, ,_ ._.... __,...._..- ----...-.'-'.-----... -- 88,472 27,066 102,283 677,392 23,049 13,925 43,355 8,100 6,000 790,343 50,000 ----------- TOTAL GENERAL FUND 58,270,796 ---------- DEBT SERVICE FU~D 5,384,542 5,384,54 CAPITAL FUND 866,699 866,69 I UTILITY CAPITAL FUND 40,000 40,00 YOUTH HAVEN II 227,301 90,415 1,000 318,71 RECREATION FEE CLASS FUND COHMUNITY EDUCATION 12,000 4,688 1, 464 18,15 L[ISURE ACTIVITIES 16,127 12,870 4,000 32,99 OUTDOOR ADVENTURE 4,344 20,586 1, 7 50 26,68 SE~IOR CITIZENS 6,827 12,265 2,000 21,0 SPEC 1 AL EVŒTS 5,376 12,800 3,000 21,1 THERAPEUTICS 3,600 2,700 500 6,8 ADULT ATHLETICS 34,786 8,982 1,000 44,7 YOUTH ATHLETICS 3,000 3,0 _.---- _~.__~__u____ ~ ---~---. ----- - - - ------- ------ _.-~_. .--_._-------~- ------ .-----~--- ----- ..--- ADHIKISTRATION 2,419 5,075 1,000 8,49 INTERNAL SERVICES FUND DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION 152,094 9,470 1,82B 163,3 OPERATIONS 137,947 108,546 112,200 12,116 370,8 DEVELOPMENT 199,473 - 7,850 700 208,0 I VEHICLE POOL COMMUNICATIONS 188,038 72,067 -6,7~S 266,8 0 j..,.,¡;,,--,.\,,-. June 14, 1988 85 2 --- _._....... ....~._..- -.--- -- - .- --- UTILITY FUND UTILITY BILLING COLLECTIONS 89,243 96,395 4,750 190,388 METER READING 50,906 9,509 11, 100 71, 515 UTILITY MAl NT & OPERATIONS ADMINISTRATION 174,302 42,768 18,000 235,070 WATER OPERATIONS 337,298 1,471,797 50,400 1,859,495 WATER MAINTENANCE 250,824 373,182 112,440 736,446 SEWER OPERATIONS 132,128 916,781 1,048,909 SEVER MAINTENANCE 207,435 158,027 44,300 409,762 SANITARY SEWER EVALUATION 228,141 122,536 66,660 417,337 NON-DEPARTMENTAL-WATER 1, 288,235 120,553 1, 408,788 NON-DEPARTMENTAL-SEWER 1,274,120 120,552 1,394,672 OFFSITE FACILITIES FUND-WATER 92,353 92,353 OFFSITE FACILITIES FUND-SEWER 197,956 197,956 I GARAGE FUND 226,826 226,826 SCHOOL OPERATING FUND SCHOOL BUS FUND SCHOOL CAFETERIA FUND SCHOOL FEDERAL PROGRAMS FUND SCHOOL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND SCHOOL LITERARY LOAN FUND SCHOOL TEXTBOOK FUND REGIONAL SPECIAL EDUCATION FUND 55,155,722 1,125,000 2,564,812 1,151,011 535,000 2,981,000 425,633 678,159 ------------ TOTAL SCHOOL FUNDS 64,616,337 ------------ TOTAL EXPENDITURES ALL FUNDS 138,978,840 ------------ ------------ I ~ 853 --~-- - -- - -- - --_. June 14, 1988 ==r=- I, REVENUES: ! GENERAL FUND DEBT FUND CAPITAL FUND UTILITY CAPITAL FUND YOUTH HAVEN II RECREATION FEE CLASS FUND INTERNAL SERVICES FUND UTILITY FUND OFFSITE FACILITY FUND-WATER OFFSITE FACILITY FUND-SEWER ! GARAGE FUND 1'1 SCHOOL OPERATING FUND II SCHOOL BUS FUND I, SCHOOL CAFETERIA FUND SCHOOL FEDERAL PROGRAMS FUND SCHOOL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND SCHOOL LITERARY FUND SCHOOL TEXTBOOK FUND REGIONAL SPECIAL EDUCATION FUND TOTAL REVENUES ALL FUNDS -------_..~. -_.- _._._~----. ------_.. --- 58,270,796 5,384,542 866,699 40,000 318,716 183,159 1,009,074 7,772,382 92,353 197,956 226,826 55,155,722 1,125,000 2,564,812 1,151,01l 535,000 2,981,000 425,633 678,159 ------------ 138,978,840 ------------ ------------ / /'" ./// /'/ /"" .../ ///' // /' // /'" ~/ /' /" //// ,,/' //'/ // //,// ! I ! I ¡ , I I I ¡ I ¡ I! ¡ / .-.==f=..'-. .-. ........... _._~ ..' .- . -.- .. j I I ·1 June 14, 1988 854 IN RE: APPOINTMENTS Industrial Development Authoritv: Supervisor Robers no inated Charles R. Saul, representing the Windsor Hills Ma isterial District to another four-year term which will expire Se tember 26, 1991. Planninq Commission: Supervisor Nickens nominated A. Po ell Robinson to fill the unexpired term of J. R. Jones, Vinton Ma isterial District. Social Services Board: Supervisor Garrett nominated Be ty Jo Anthony to another four-year term which will expire July 19 1992. IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS I Supervisor Robers announced that Dr. Hardy and Polly Ho loway from the County Schools have visited a school cafeteria rated by an outside vendor near St. Louis to study cafeteria handled by outside contractors. He has also asked Tim G ala to coordinate with the Regional Partnership for a Roanoke V ley Day to be held at George Mason University in northern V· a i is coming to a conclusion on their study of annexation plan a report by September 1. Supervisor Nickens moved that the County Attorney the Landfill Board contract to determine whether it would Supervisor McGraw advised that the Blue Ridge Region h announced they will have a regional data base, a map and a v' eo available. He also announced that the Roanoke Valley C peration Committee will meet on Friday, June 17, at Botetourt C He informed the Board that the VML-VACO Task Force on s I a low Roanoke County to have another rept0sentative. The motion --.---, . --'..'-'- II I / / I ./ /1' ----~--~:-~-~-.. -·---------~~~--==~/--;:--=-===-F I) I / / l / ,/ / / // / //' I I / / I / / ;l ,/ I I I I 855 June 14, 1988 wa seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following re orded vote: AY S: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NA S: None IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA County Administrator Elmer Hodge advised that Item 8, a ireworks Permit for Hills Department must be changed for in urance purposes to reflect that the Sheriff's Department em loyees working at the display shall be on-duty officers. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the Consent Ag nda with the change to Item 8. The motion was seconded by Su ervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AY S: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NA S: None RESOLUTION 61488-15 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke Co nty, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Bo rd of Supervisors for June 14, 1988, designated as Item L - 856 June 14, 1988 --._---- -, ...,._-.-._~~_.... ...--- '---'~'----'""----'--'--"--'~-- --. ---...-----. - ,,--,...-- .. -.,. - .,--. ---""-'--'.---.-'-,".-.......-...-.-,- .,,' ..._;._--,-~ Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Item 1 through 13, inclusive, as follows: 1. Minutes of Meetings - March 9, 1988, March 29, 1988 2. Request for acceptance of Beaver Lane, Horn Circle, and Elizabeth Drive into the VDOT Secondary System. 3. Request for acceptance of Tulip Lane, Sunflower Drive, and Ivy Lane into the VDOT Secondary System. 4 . Acknowledgment from Va. Department of Transportation that the following roads have be n taken into the Secondary System: a. 0.20 miles of Indian Hill Drive b. 0.04 miles of Memory Lane c. 0.06 miles of Shadow Lane 5. Request for acceptance of Lantern Street, Candlelight Circle and Shadow Lane into the VDO Secondary System. 6. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals. 7. Ratification of charter agreement for the operation of the Cardinal Academy and authorization to execute the charter. 8. Request for a Fireworks Permit from Hills Department Store. 9. Request for a Fireworks Permit from the Town of Vinton. 10. Acceptance of a drainage easement donated by Charles W. Houghton across Lot 6, Cave Spring Professional Center. I I I I 857 ~ 11. Acceptance of a water line easement donated by Lloyd G. and Lee W. Lazarus - Woodmont Manor, Section 3. 12. Acceptance of a sanitary sewer line donated by Carter M. Coffey - Lot 2 and a portion of Lot 6A, Queens Court Subdivision. 13. Resolution requesting authorization from the Va. Department of Transportation to erect a speed enforcement sign on Route 220. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized an directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said it ms the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to th s resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, after discussion and th amendment to Item L-8, seconded by Supervisor Nickens and th following recorded vote: AY Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NA S: None RESOLUTION 61488-14.a REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF BEAVER LANE, HORN CIRCLE, AND ELIZABETH DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke Virginia, as follows: 1.That this matter came this day to be heard upon the pr ceedings herein, and upon the application of Beaver Lane, Horn r- I 858 June 14, 1988 ---.-- ----_.._--_.. _.,-- ..----...- _.' .."_ _._. ""___.._.. "", d_"_._.··..~ _..._.._.H.___'".."_....., Circle, and Elizabeth Drive to be accepted and made a part of he Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of t e Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said streets have been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Foxfir Subdivision and Montgomery Village, Section 7, which is record d respectively in Plat Book 9, Page 90, and Plat Book 8, Page 62 of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on June 30, 1977 and February 13, 19 4; and that by reason of the recordation of said map, no report f om a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way fr m the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3.That said streets known as Beaver Lane, Horn Circle, and Elizabeth Drive and which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are here y established as public streets to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said streets by t e Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: I I I I 85 ~ .___,_._ ____*_._ø June 14 1 AY s: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett NA s: None RESOLUTION 61488-14.d REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF TULIP LANE, SUNFLOWER DRIVE, AND IVY LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke Co nty, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon th proceedings herein, and upon the application of Tulip Lane, Su flower Drive, and Ivy Lane to be accepted and made a part of th Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of th Virginia State Code. ea dedicated by virtue of certain maps known as Spring 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said streets ha Gr Subdivision, Sections 5 and 7, which maps were recorded in PI t Book 9, Page 225, and Plat Book 9, Page 281, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Vi ginia, on June 28, 1982, and April 12, 1984, respectively; and th t by reason of the recordation of said maps, no report from a Bo rd of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from th abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby gu rantees said right-of-way for drainage. 860 ---- -.. '--~.'--_..+'-," __ n.___Jllne_.14#._ _L9B 8._ .,-. .-. -~'~-'-_._'-'~"..""'-"- ~,.~,..... -._"'.._.~.' ,.-.,- ··-'---11--'-· I I I I .,. ..__~_.__,.~._.,___,_._ ___,_ _ . _.._ ',__., _._._" _ N_, 3. That said streets known as Tulip Lane, Sunflowe Drive, and Ivy Lane and which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public streets to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said streets by t e Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garr tt NAYS: None RESOLUTION 61488-14.b REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF LANTERN STREET, CANDLELIGHT CIRCLE, AND SHADOW L E INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roan ke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Lantern Street,Candlelight Circle, and Shadow Lane to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. I I 861 __._ _._'..~._ ___ - ..~ _0. ~ __ _ 1 q8A 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage ea ements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said streets ha e been dedicated by virtue of certain maps known as Beacon Ri ge Subdivision, Section 1 and Section 2, which maps were re orded in Plat Book 9, Page 303, and Plat Book 9, Page 323, of th records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke Co nty, Virginia, on November 14, 1983, and May 14, 1985, re pectively;and that by reason of the recordation of said maps, no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of ri ht-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The II Bo rd hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said streets known as Lantern Street, Ca dlelight Circle, and Shadow Lane and which are shown on a ce tain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are he eby established as public streets to become a part of the St te Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from an after notification of official acceptance of said streets by Virginia Department of Transportation. I Su On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett AY NA None 862 ~.-. ~.~-- -'~ .~_.. - ___,...J.une.. .1_'4....19ßJ3 - -< -~,.~.. --- ..-... -_. ,--. r 'I /¡ 'I I I RESOLUTION 61488-14.1 REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION F OM THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO ERE T A BILLBOARD SIGN ON ROUTE 220 FOR THE PURPOSE OF ADVISING THE PUBLIC OF A COUNTY ENFORCEMENT PROJ CT BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roan ke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Sheriff's Department h s received a federal grant through the Department of Motor Vehic es for a special patrol project on U. S. Route 220, and WHEREAS, this grant will provide funding for off-d ty deputies to work special patrol schedules to reduce the incide ts of vehicle crashes through strict enforcement, and WHEREAS, billboard space located at the end of Rou e 581 as it becomes Route 220 in the vicinity of Tanglewood Mall has been donated by Advertising companies to advise the genera public of this special enforcement project, and WHEREAS, the proposed billboard signs do not meet he criteria and regulations established by the Virginia Departmen of Transportation for outdoor signs, and WHEREAS, Roanoke County will apply for a ninety-da waiver through the Roanoke County Department of Planning and Zoning and will accept responsibility for the sign during this I I i I I I period. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby requests that e I I I I 863 June 14 1 "- --...- vi ginia Department of Transportation inspect the location for th proposed sign, and following said inspection, allow erection of the sign which shall not be used for advertising purposes but sh II be an official Roanoke County sign limited to the uses and du ation established in this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Ni kens and the following recorded vote: AY S: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NA S: None IN RE: REPORTS The following reports were received and filed: 1 . Accounts Paid - May 1988 2 . Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 4 . Board Contingency Fund IN RE: CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. Mr. David Shelor, owner of the one of the pr posed landfill sites, presented reasons why he felt that the 864 __ _ June___l_4.,...1.9.88. ...._. ,._'..'_'.'._.".,'.__ ·___·~·_·_.A ... - -.-.--.--,-^.-.-,.- --- ---.--..",- --,- ----.-...--..--.-- site located on Fort Lewis Mountain should not be considered f r a proposed landfill. 2. Charles L. Landis. presented a petition signed the residents in the Glenvar area of Roanoke County who are opposed to the proposed landfill site on Fort Lewis Mountain. 3. Curtis Beach. Executive Vice President of the Salem-Roanoke County Chamber of Commerce, explained that the Chamber of commerce recently adopted a resolution requesting t at AMTRACK consider rerouting its Cardinal, New York to Chicago passenger train through the Roanoke Valley. They are requesti g support from the Board of Supervisors also. II Supervisor McGraw moved that a resolution of suppo t be prepared for the June 28th board meeting. The motion was seconded and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garr tt NAYS: None 4. Lewis Kaeser, 451 Ingals Boulevard, Salem, spo e in opposition to the process by which proposed sites were selected by the landfill Board. IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION At 6:10 p.m., Supervisor Garrett moved to go into Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a I I I 865 . .~ Junp. 14. 1 qRR . (1 to discuss a personnel matter and (6) to discuss a legal ma ter. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and ca ried by the following recorded vote: AY S: NA S: IN RE: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett None OPEN SESSION session and recess for dinner. The motion was seconded by At 6:30 p.m. Supervisor Garrett moved to return to Su AY NA S: IN RE: me tinge Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett None EVENING SESSION At 7:05 p.m., Chairman Garrett reconvened the IN RE: NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED FROM AFTERNOON SESSION) 8. Appropriation of Funds for theCleanuD of Di osal Areas Ad'acent to the Dixie Caverns Landfill: Mr. Hodge pr sented a summary of the bids for cleanup of the Dixie Caverns 866 -"~~. ...-.---,--- --··----·-·.-June.-14,.-.1988 - ._ '"'.._._ _."_ __.._._~.. "_',_'d ~ ,. --- ----_.. --.-.--.-...-. _. '-.'-'--.'- - .- -_... -. ,---- - -... Landfill. The cleanup is divided into three areas: Sludge, Drums and Fly Ash. Mr. Hodge recommended approval to appropri te the amount to clean the Sludge and Drum Area only at a cost of $457,000. He requested approval to continue negotiations for he Fly Ash cleanup. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garr tt NAYS: None IN RE: PUBLIC HEARINGS 688-1 Petition of Inland Properties Corporation to rez ne a 1.70 acre tract from R-1 Residential to B-1 Business to construct an office complex located n the east side of Route 419 immediately south of ts intersection with Cordell Drive in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District (CONTINUED FROM MARCH 22, 1988 AND MAY 24, 1988) DENIED Chairman Garrett reminded those present that there was a public hearing on this issue previously. The Attorney f r the petitioners were now planning to present new information. Attorney Ed Natt stated that the access to the sit plan is off McVitty Road, the only feasible access from the property. Mr. Natt stated the plan is in accordance with the 19 I I I I . -_.- -..--- .~ 867 1 qRR Fr ntage Development Plan. He felt that was the most relevant fa tor in the request. The following citizens spoke in opposition to the pr posed rezoning request: 1. Roqer Lordon, 4390 Sheldon Drive, who represented th citizens in the Cresthill subdivision who was concerned about th amount of traffic on Cordell Drive. 2. Nancv Gillespie, 2643 Gaylord Road, opposed be ause of increased traffic. 3. P. J. Gillespie, 2643 Gaylord Road concerned be ause portions of the proposed rezoning are in the floodplain an because of traffic on McVitty Road. 4. Kendrick Stevens, 4620 Cresthill Drive concerned be ause of potential flood problems. 5. Thomas Leqqette, Woods, Rogers and Hazelgrove, re resenting residents of Sugarloaf East. They are concerned ab intersection of Route 419 and Cordell Drive. He pr a petition to the Board containing 200 petitions in op to the proposed rezoning. Supervisor Garrett asked Mr. Natt how the petitioners pI address the traffic problems on Cordell Drive and Cr sthill Drive, and whether the property is in the 100 year fl 868 - June -1-4 -.-1.9ß.a - ---. .'---~- Mr. Natt advised that the map Mr. Gillespie used i an approximation from tax insurance maps, not the specific location of the floodplain as designated by FEMA, and the property is outside the floodplain. The petitioners are aware they must fill all requirements by the County concerning flood control. Mr. Natt responded that the traffic will be going in the opposite direction than the residents. There will be 292 vehicles over an 8-hour period, which is not considered a significant impact. Supervisor Garrett outlined the efforts of the Cou ty to solve the speeding problems along Cresthill Drive since 198 . He stated he was most concerned with the speeding rather than he amount of traffic. Supervisor Garrett moved to deny the petition. Th motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers. Supervisor Nickens asked Assistant County Administrator John Hubbard what progress had been made since a 1985 letter was sent from Roanoke County to Kendrick Stevens concerning flood control. Mr. Hubbard responded that the Virginia Department of transportation was responsible and was reluctant to work on the problem. He will check on the status since the letter was written. The motion to deny the petition was carried by the following recorded vote: I I I I 869 - - - - -_.- ._-- _.- -- .... ~~ 1988 AY S: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NA S: Supervisor McGraw 68 -2 petition of Occidental DeveloDment Ltd. to rezone a 2.0 acre parcel from R-1, Residential to B-1 Business and a 22.87 acre parcel from R-1, Residential to R-3 Residential, to construct offices and multifamily dwellings, located immediately west of the intersection of Colonial Avenue and Ogden road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District (CONTINUED FROM MAY 24, 1988) DENIED Don Wetherington was the attorney for the petitioner. Mr Wetherington reported that the company requesting the oning has been in business for 70 years and has dealt solely the development, ownership and management of quality rtments for half that time. They own 28,000 apartment units This proposal is for 216 low-rise garden style rtments, 120 which will be one-bedroom. There will be fewer n 10 apartments per acre and six buildings on 25 acres. The racter of the property will be maintained, as well as the gr There will be only one entrance at the in ersection of Colonial Road and Ogden where there is four-way si alization. There will be no passage of traffic through the Ge rgetown community. The calculations show there is nominal Colonial Avenue by the proposed complex when compared to single family homes on the same property. There are two ---T I I I i 870 -.-.,.. ~'. -...._-~~ .. ....... JUIlQ.- -14-,- .-:1-9.8-8---... -~ ..., . ,~. .._.~. offices planned and the types of uses have been proffered whic are administrative, executive and editorial offices, professio al offices, real estate, financial, insurance or other general offices. There will be no retail uses such as banks and medic 1 offices. The proposed rezoning is in compliance with the futu e Land Use Plan and the Comprehensive Plan. The staff report acknowledges that drainage and utilities pose no problem. 'I I Buford Lumsden, architect for the project, descri ed the design of the project and outlined plans for the water, st rm drain, sanitary sewer, and traffic. Evans Jessee, attorney for property owner Katherine Ronk, introduced Donald Ronk, her son, who addressed the Board Mr. Ronk advised that he has been looking for the proper development for the property. There are two or three options available and multifamily is one of them. Mr. Ronk plans to develop the property as single family homes with 75 homes if t e proposed zoning is not approved. The following citizens spoke concerning the proposed rezoning: 1. Attornev Bruce Maver, 111 Virginia Avenue, Vinton, spoke representing Georgetown Park and Greenwood Fores subdivision residents who are opposed to the rezoning. They a e concerned about the growth of apartment complexes in the area. They would prefer the R-1 rezoning to remain for single family I I I I June 14, 1988 871 - -- --~,.- - .. ho es. The additional traffic at the intersection of Ogden Road an Colonial Avenue would make it more difficult for those in Ge rgetown Park to enter Colonial Avenue. There is no way of kn wing how much more traffic will be generated by the business of ices. He pointed out that the taxes would be the same whether th property was developed as multifamily or single family. Supervisor Johnson advised that based on 1.5 children in each single family house. the cost would be $2,000 per child in education costs and the impact would be greater to the County. He also pointed out that with the additional traffic, Colonial Av nue might be improved sooner. 2. Herbert N. Kilbourn, 3458 Greencliff Road spoke in support of the rezoning because he did not feel it would have a egative impact on the homes in Georgetown Park. Mr. Kilbourn is a real estate appraiser. 3. Howard Swank, Jr., 3434 Ashmeade Drive, S. w. sp ke in support of the project because it would limit the access to streets in Georgetown Park, and will enhance the property. 4. Julia Knott2 3548 Georgetown Road S. W., spoke in su the proposed rezoning because the streets would remain cl access. 5. H. Cletus Brovles, 3511 Old Towne Road S. W. sp opposition to the project because of the large number of ap rtments presently in the area, and because of possible 872 June 14, 1988 -'-'--'""-"-- --_.~ .,-...-,,- .1=== ..~-""----,-_. ...--.... "+ --."" --- .~~-- .__._--~---_._.....- I I I I deterioration of the residential neighborhood, and the additio al traffic. 6. Mark S. Seiler, 3471 Old Towne Road, S. W. spo e in opposition, particularly the B-1 request because it would 1 ad to future businesses locating on Colonial Avenue. 7. Craiq McClellan, 3403 Greencliff Road in opposition to the rezoning. He expressed concern that this rezoning request has had a negative impact to the entire community. 8. David S. Courev, 3419 Ashmeade Drive S. W., sp ke in opposition because of the impact on schools, increased traffic, and devaluation of residential property. 9. Sandra Ulrey, 5031 Keithwood Drive S. in favor because of the low density of the apartments compare to the high density of single family homes. She has cared for th property for five years and outlined problems she has had wit the residents from Georgetown Park using the property. 10. John Ebv, 3504 Old Town Road S. W. spoke in support of the rezoning request. He advised he was originally opposed but has changed his mind because he does not want the streets opened. He also felt that the proffers offered on the business portion was adequate. 11. Howard Ward, 3539 Georgetown Road S. W., spok in opposition because of devalued property in Georgetown Park. ke I I 873 __..Jun.EL1..L. 1 9 8 8 Supervisor Robers moved to deny the petition. The mo ion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the fo lowing recorded vote: AY S: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NA S: Supervisor McGraw IN RE: RECONSIDERATION OF THE ITEM TO IMPLEMENT THE CL SSIFICATION PLAN Supervisor Robers moved to reconsider the above item II wh ch was deferred during the afternoon session. The motion was se onded by Supervisor McGraw. The motion was carried by the fo lowing recorded vote: AY Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett None fl Mr. Hodge requested that the Board approve the im lementation of the Classification Plan so that no new em loyees bypass existing employees in salary when brought up to th bottom of the scale, and that employees be brought up to sc their anniversary date. Supervisor Johnson moved to adjourn the meeting. The mo was seconded by Supervisor Robers. Supervisor McGraw ad ised there was an item on the floor. Supervisor Johnson ~ 874 --_.,-,--- ---_.-._-- .._....._- _J\lf.le. 14L 1988 --.--r-- il .-. i¡ L 'I 'I withdrew his motion and then moved the agenda. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers. Supervisor Johnson withdrew that motion and moved 0 authorize the County Administrator to work out those differenc s that the new Classification Plan would have such that it does ot adversely affect any employee. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw. Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Gar tt AYES: NAYS: None IN RE: ADJOURNMENT Supervisor Johnson moved to adjourn. The motion s seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried unanimously. ~ @-p~~~~ Lee arrett, Chairman I I