Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2/23/1988 - Regular February 23, 1988 513 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 February 23, 1988 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke ounty, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County dministration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday, and the I econd regularly scheduled meeting of the month of February, 988. N RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Garrett called the meeting to order at 2:05 .m. The roll call was taken. EMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Lee Garrett, Vice Chairman Richard Robers, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Steven A. McGraw, Harry C. Nickens EMBERS ABSENT: None TAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator for Management Services; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of Public Facilities; Timothy W. Gubala, Assistant County Administrator for I -~ 514 February 23, 1988 n ._...~-._..._._.^_. ...._.... Community Development; Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney, Mary H. Allen, Deput Clerk; Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering; Diane Hyatt, Director Fin nce¡ IN RE: WORK SESSION ON DRAINAGE Director of Engineering Phillip Henry presented an overview of the drainage program. The county has received 2 0 drainage complaints since May 1987. They have held eleven community meetings with the citizens throughout the county. Most of the drainage complaints are divided into three areas of responsibility. The Virginia Department of Transportation i responsible for drainage within road right-of-ways, and drai age I easements acquired by VDOT and easements upstream and downst earn of right-of-ways. Roanoke County is responsible for drainag easements for stormwaters leaving right-of-way of state maintained roads and is responsible for keeping drainage easements clear beyond VDOT's responsibility. Property owne s are responsible for certain drainage problems also. Follow ng the work session he requested that the Board give the staff direction on how they should pursue the drainage program. Assistant Director of Engineering George Simpson reviewed the list of prioritized projects that meet the crit ria for drainage responsibility for Roanoke County. The total I estimated cost is $266,000. He also presented a list of maj r drainage projects which totaled $10,945,000. Mr. Henry advi ed 515 February 23, 1988 hat many of the drainage problems concern erosion control and equested that Arnold Covey from Development Review discuss that ssue. Mr. Covey described the erosion control violation rocedure which is set by state code. He advised that the only Iternative to following this procedure would be to use the rainage program to correct the violations. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the drainage aintenance philosophy as outlined in the work session and to prioritized list of maintenance projects. The motion seconded by Supervisor McGraw. Supervisor Johnson asked that he motion be amended to request that the Sheriff's Department be otified about the potential use of non-violent repeat offenders n the drainage program. The motion carried by the following ecorded vote: YES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett None Mr. Hodge advised that they will bring back a report in months advising the board of what projects have been ompleted. I N RE: OPENING CEREMONIES I 516 February 23, 1988 -_.._~~'_. -_.~- _.- - -~- _. --- ._--,-- .~.~.. ._..~._- The invocation was given by The Reverend Alan Rowbotham, Unity of Roanoke Valley Church. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. IN REi PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARD County Treasurer Alfred C. Anderson presented a fr med letter from U. S. President Ronald Reagan congratulating tho e elected officials who took office on January 1, 1988. He requested that it be hung in an appropriate place. IN RE i NEW BUSINESS 1. ADDroval of Resolution reauestina the Federal to restud ortion of Barnhard Creek: Director of Engineering Phillip Henry reported that he Flood Insurance Study was completed in October 1978. In 198 , one of the property owners did a survey and FEMA did the evaluation and determined that the flood elevation at Branha dt Creek was in error by four feet. Other property owners in t e vicinity of Farmingdale South have requested that the flood elevations be reviewed. Based on discussions with FEMA ther is money allocated to do this study if Roanoke County requests t. __ ,__ ._. _"._ YO__ I I I I 517 · February 23, 1988 --- Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the resolution equesting a restudy of Barnardt Creek by FEMA. The motion was econded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following ecorded vote: YES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett AYS: None RESOLUTION 22388-2 REQUESTING FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) TO COMPLETE A RESTUDY OF BARNHARDT CREEK BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter carne this day to be heard upon the roceedings herein. 2. That the Flood Insurance Study for Roanoke County, irginia with an effective date of October 17, 1978 has been and used by the Roanoke County government. 3. That the Flood Insurance Study was revised on December , 1985 to reflect errors in field data along portions of Creek. 4. That there is evidence to indicate that the field data long the full section of Barnhardt Creek, being that portion ithin Roanoke County, Virginia is in error and that a restudy is ecessary to have correct information concerning the 100 year lood plain, and other related flood data. 518 February 23, 1988 - --- - _._- ---~ - . --~._. - -¥ - - ._". .- ._-- ..._~.. . ..' . .~_. _.~ .w ____.,_____.___..._.°00__.___._..·._.__.__._.___..__ 5. That the restudy is important to various property owners within the County and the restudy could result in the elimination of unnecessary hardship to these property owners there is a need to proceed expeditiously with this study. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Super isor McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None 2. Elimination of RidershiD Fees for CORTRAN Proaram: Director of Finance Diane Hyatt advised that sinc July 1, 1987, the County has contracted with RADAR to provid this service to the citizens at a cost of $60,000. It is presently taking 20 hours of staff time and printing and pos age costs to distribute the tickets which are sold for $1.50 eac . It is therefore costing about $6,000 but bringing in only $3 00 in revenue. It would be more cost effective to allow citize s to ride on the CORTRAN system free. Elderly citizens would pre ent their League of Older Americans card, and handicapped citize s would present their Easter Seal card. Staff is therefore recommending the elimination of ridership fees for the CORT program. I Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGra and carried by the following recorded vote: I 51 9 February 23, 1988 YES: AYS: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett I None 3. AdoDtion of a Resolution authorizina issuance of 4.7 million eneral obli b nds throu h the Vir inia es urces Authorit: Assistant County Administrator John hambliss these bonds were previously authorized by the Board of upervisors for water and sewer projects. $3.7 million of these rojects were approved by a referendum in 1974, the remaining 1.6 are from the 1986 bond referendum. The interest rate for hese bonds is approximately 7.9 percent. Because these two eferendum were approved prior to July 1, 1987, they do not corne nder the public hearing requirement as will other bond issues. taff recommend the adoption of the resolution authorizing the ssuance of the bonds. Supervisor Nickens asked what the impact of these bonds ill have on future water rates. Mr. Chambliss responded they re getting data together for budget projections. Supervisor ohnson pointed out that the main reason for the high water rates s the cost to purchase water from the City of Roanoke Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the resolution. motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the recorded vote: I YS: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett None 520 February 23, 1988 _.'.---~- _... - - -.-. ''',_... - ~,~ -_. -~.--' - ,..~ -.-., ..~.-....."..-.~ ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw RESOLUTION 22388-5 OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF ITS $960,000 WATER SYSTEM REVENUE BOND, SERIES 1988A, AND SETTING FORTH THE FORM AND DETAILS THEREOF ~ --'--- ._,. The County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County"), a poli ical subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, has applied for and has received approval for a loan of $960,000 from the Virgin a Resources Authority ("Authority") to finance extensions of t e County's existing water system. The County will issue its W ter System Revenue Bond, Series 1988A ("Local Bond"), in the ori inal principal amount of $960,000, and sell the Local Bond to the Au- thority to evidence the County's obligation to repay the loa. The foregoing arrangements are reflected in the fo low- ing documents, forms of which have been presented to this me and filed with the County's documents: (1) Financing Agreem dated as of March 1, 1988 ("Financing Agreement"), between t e Authority and the County, together with a form of the Local attached thereto, and (2) Preliminary Reoffering Statement, February 9, 1988 ("Preliminary Reoffering Statement") . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Sup sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that: I I I I 521 February 23, 1988 1. Definitions. Unless otherwise defined, all capital- zed terms used in this Resolution shall have the meanings set orth in the Financing Agreement. 2. Authorization of Bond. The issuance of a revenue ond of the County to be known as the County of Roanoke, Virgin- a, Water System Revenue Bond, Series 1988A, is authorized. The ocal Bond shall be issued in the original principal amount of and sold to the Authority for the purchase price set the Financing Agreement, which purchase price is hereby in the best interests of the Commonwealth of and the County. 3. Authorization of Financina Aareement. The Finan- Agreement is approved. The Chairman of the County's Board f Supervisors ("Chairman") is authorized to execute on behalf of Financing Agreement in substantially the form sub- meeting, with such changes, insertions or omis- ions as may be approved by the Chairman, whose approval shall be idenced conclusively by the execution and delivery thereof. e Chairman, the Clerk of the County's Board of Supervisors Treasurer of the County ("Treasurer"), the County inistrator, the Assistant County Administrator - Management rvices ("Assistant County Administrator") and the Director of ilities of the County ("Director") are each authorized to exe- te and deliver on behalf of the County such other instruments, 522 February 23, 1988 ---- - -- _.~ --- - -- -- -_._- ~ ~.__..~-,'-~-_."~--'- --._---- -~--- --- - ---- ---- ---- - - _______·_____L~____ _ documents or certificates, and to do and perform such thin and acts, as they shall deem necessary Or appropriate to carry ut the transactions authorized by this Resolution or contempla ed by the Local Bond Or the Financing Agreement, and all of the f re- going, previously done or performed by the Chairman, the CI rk, the Treasurer, the County Administrator, the Assistant Coun y Administrator Or the Director, are in all respects approved, rat- ified and confirmed. issued as a fully registered bond without coupons in 4. Details of Local Bond. The Local Bond I tion of $960,000 and shall be dated March 1, 1988. Bond shall bear interest at the rates indicated below, and t e principal amount thereof shall be payable, subject to prior demption, on November I in each of the years and in the paym t amounts set forth below: I , I \ i I Principal Payment Amount $20,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 30,000 30,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 40,000 40,000 45,000 45,000 50,000 55,000 Principal Payment Due Date November 1, 1988 November 1, 1989 November 1, 1990 November 1, 1991 November 1, 1992 November 1, 1993 November 1, 1994 November 1, 1995 November 1, 1996 November 1, 1997 November 1, 1998 November 1, 1999 November 1, 2000 November 1, 2001 November 1, 2002 Inter Rat 4 . 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 6. 6. 6. 6.5 6.6 6.8 6.9 7.0 7.1 I February 23, 1988 523 60,000 November 1, 2003 7.2 65,000 November 1, 2004 7.3 65,000 November 1, 2005 7.35 70,000 November 1, 2006 7.4 80,000 November 1, 2007 7.45 85,000 November 1, 2008 7.5 Each principal installment of the Local Bond shall bear nterest at its respective interest rate from the date of the ocal Bond until such principal payment amount is paid. In addi- ion, the County shall pay a late payment charge as provided in he Financing Agreement if any payment of principal or interest s not received within five days of its due date. Interest on I he Local Bond shall be computed on the basis of a year of 360 ays and twelve 30-day months. The principal of and premium, if and interest on the Local Bond shall be payable at the place the manner provided in the Financing Agreement. Subject to the right of the County to apply Revenues to he payment of Operation and Maintenance Expense and to the provi- ions of the Financing Agreement, the Revenues are hereby pledged I o secure the payment of the principal of and premium, if any, nd interest on the Local Bond and the performance of the obligations under the Financing Agreement. The principal of and premium, if any, and interest on Bond shall be payable in lawful money of the United America only from the Revenues and other sources ledged to the payment thereof as provided in this Resolution and he Financing Agreement. 524 February 23, 1988 5. PreDavment of Local Bond. The Local Bond sha be subject to prepayment as set forth in the Financing Agreeme 6. Acceleration of Local Bond. If an Event of Dault shall have occurred and be continuing, the principal amount f and accrued interest on the Local Bond may be declared imme ate- ly due and payable by written notice to the County. 7. Execution of Local Bond. The Local Bond shal signed by the manual or facsimile signature of the Chairman the Treasurer, and the corporate seal of the County or a fa im- ile of such seal shall be affixed thereon and shall be atte ed by the manual or facsimile signature of the Clerk. In case officer whose signature shall appear on the Local Bond shal cease to be such officer before the delivery of the Local B d, such signature shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient fall purposes the same as if he or she had remained in office un such delivery. The Local Bond may be signed by such person as at the actual time of the execution thereof shall be the pr er officers to sign such Local Bond although at the date of de . of such Local Bond such persons may not have been such offi rs. 8. Form of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be stantially in the form attached as Exhibit A to the Financi Agreement, with such appropriate variations, omissions and . ser- tions as permitted or required by this Resolution or the Fi n- cing Agreement. There may be endorsed on the Local Bond su I I I I February 23, 1988 525 egend or text as may be necessary or appropriate to conform to ny applicable rules and regulations of any governmental autho- ity or any usage or requirement of law with respect thereto. 9. Reaistration, Transfer and Exchanae. The County ereby appoints the Clerk as its registrar and transfer agent to eep books for the registration and transfer of the Local Bond nd to make such registration and transfers under such reasonable egulations as the County may prescribe. Upon surrender for transfer or exchange of the Local ond at the office of the Clerk, the County shall execute and eliver in the name of the transferee or transferees a new Local ond or Bonds for a principal amount equal to the Local Bond sur- endered and of the same form and maturity and bearing interest t the same rate as the Local Bond surrendered, subject in each reasonable regulations as the County may prescribe. f presented for transfer, exchange, redemption or payment, the Bond shall be accompanied by a written instrument or instru- of transfer or authorization for exchange, in form and sub- tance reasonably satisfactory to the County, duly executed by he registered owner or by his or her duly authorized attorney-in- act or legal representative. The Local Bond may not be regis- bearer. A new Local Bond delivered upon any transfer or ex- ange shall be a valid obligation of the County, evidencing the 526 February 23, 1988 >-~ .-.- - ---- - - ._-- - - -~_._--"-~ --~'_...- - _....-~.. ."--,--- same debt as the Local Bond surrendered, shall be secured b this Resolution and the Financing Agreement and entitled to all 0 the security and benefits hereof to the same extent as the Local Bond surrendered. 10. Charaes for Exchanae or Transfer. No charge hall be made for any exchange or transfer of the Local Bond, but he County may require payment by the holder of the Local Bond 0 a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge that may be imposed in relation thereto. 11. TemDorarv Tvoewritten Local Bond. The County may initially issue the Local Bond in typewritten form. If the ocal Bond is issued in typewritten form, upon the written request of the registered owner of the Local Bond and upon surrender of the Local Bond in typewritten form, the County shall promptly pr - pare, execute and deliver to such registered owner a Local B nd in printed form of the same maturity and interest rate and f r the same principal amount as the typewritten Local Bond. Ap ro- priate variations, omissions and insertions may be made in t e Local Bond to facilitate printing. 12. Mutilated Lost Stolen or Destro ed Local Bo If the Local Bond has been mutilated, lost, stolen or destro the County shall execute and deliver a new Local Bond of lik date and tenor in exchange and substitution for, and upon de ery to the County and cancellation of, such mutilated Local I I February 23, 1988 527 r in lieu of and in substitution for such lost, stolen or de- troyed Local Bond; provided, however, that the County shall exe- ute, authenticate and deliver a new Local Bond only if the regis- ered owner thereof has paid the reasonable expenses and charges f the County in connection therewith and, in the case of a lost, or destroyed Local Bond (i) has filed with the County evi- ence satisfactory to it that such Local Bond was lost, stolen or estroyed and that the holder of the Local Bond was the regis- ered owner thereof and (ii) has furnished to the County indem- I ity satisfactory to it. If the Local Bond has matured, instead f issuing a new Local Bond, the County may pay the same without thereof upon receipt of the aforesaid evidence and in- 13. Preliminary Reofferina Statement. The inclusion f the information with respect to the County contained in the ection "Roanoke County" in the Preliminary Reoffering Statement, repared in connection with the reoffering and sale of the Corre- Bonds (as defined in the Financing Agreement), is hereby atified and confirmed and the use of such information in final orm in the Reoffering Statement of the Authority is hereby autho- ized and approved; provided, however, such information contained n the Reoffering Statement shall be reviewed and approved by the ssistant County Administrator before the distribution of the eoffering Statement. I 528 February 23, 1988 - - -- - " ._~- ..~_."--.__.,---" -~_.---'.-....._-,- .._-,~~~_._._._----,-,_._-- _.~._--"_. -"-- ------ -~--_._-- - .----- --.'- '.".'. '- -. . -- - - ---,.P'.- __._____.__'" "____.._.__.__._"._.__ _." _,,_,._.._..,_..~.,.,_.__ 14. Filina of Resolution: Notice. The Chairman a d the Clerk are each hereby authorized and directed to file or cause to be filed a certified copy of this Resolution with t e Circuit Court of Roanoke County pursuant to Sections 15.1-19 and 15.1-212 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and wi hin ten days thereafter to publish once in a newspaper of genera circulation in the County a notice setting forth (1) in brie and general terms the purpose for which the Local Bond is to be issued and (2) the principal amount of the Local Bond. 15. Conflictinq Resolutions. All parts of resolu ions of the Board which are in conflict with this Resolution are ere- by rescinded and repealed. 16. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take e fect immediately. On motion of Supervisor Robers, seconded by Superv sor Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw IN REi REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Reauest to reschedule work session on Roanoke River Tributaries Steams Study bv CorDS of Enaineers: Chair an Garrett advised that this work session has been continued un il I I I I February 23, 1988 529 arch 22, 1988 and Assistant County Administrator John Hubbard is o work with the Corps of Engineers. 2. Work Session with the School Board for budaet iscussion: Supervisor Johnson requested a work session with he School Board. Chairman Garrett advised that a work session as tentatively been set for March 22, 1988. He suggested that he work session with the Corps of Engineer be kept open and that he joint work session with the School Board be set for March 2nd. N REi APPOINTMENTS 1. Health DeDartment Board of Directors: upervisor Nickens nominated Susan Adcock to serve a two year expiring November 26, 1989. 2. Grievance Panel: Supervisor Robers nominated Owens to serve his unexpired two-year term which will expire 27, 1989. REi REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS SUDervisor Johnson requested a study on the galities and feasibilities of considering schools as community r- 530 ... February 23, 1988 --- _._a_.~·__.___~_,,_"_________.._,.______~ -_._~._._-_. .- .. - - -- - __ _ _ __e"_ ,__ .~ _. _ _. ___'" .__...._._.____._.. '_'_"'__>."-,_"0._ ._'_..'_ ,~.., ._.,_ ~ ~__. ..'~_'~'.' _., . . centers and allowing the use of these facilities for other purposes. SUDervisor Robers advised he had contacted Dr. Wad Gilley at George Mason University concerning his study of southwest Virginia and he has agreed to meet with Mr. Robers SUDervisor Mcaraw announced there had been two meetings of the VACO/VML Committee on annexation. They will make a recommendation to the Grayson Commission in July and Octob r. SUDervisor Garrett announced that he and Mr. Hodge had met with their counterparts in the City of Roanoke, Fran lin a dialog with all localities. I County, Bedford County,and Botetourt County, and had establi hed IN RE i CONSENT AGENDA Supervisor Garrett moved that the Consent Agenda b approved with the removal of Item 1. The motion was seconde by Supervisor Robers and carried by a unanimous voice vote. On Item 1, Confirmation of Committee Appointments, Supervisor Garrett requested that the appointment of Eugene Martin to the Grievance Panel is the replacement for not Richard Robers. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve Item 1 as amen ed. I February 23, 1988 531 he motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens. The motion was arried by a unanimous voice vote. RESOLUTION NO. 22388-7 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke ounty, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the oard of Supervisors for February 23, 1988, designated as Item I Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as I o each item separately set forth in said section designated terns 1 through 9, inclusive, as follows: 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Grievance Panel and Transportation and Safety Commission. 2. Notification from the Virginia Department of Transportation that the 0.49 miles of Route 1950 (Forest Edge Drive has been accepted into the Secondary System. 3. Request for acceptance of Hill Drive, Airpoint Drive and Airpoint Road into the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System. 4. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Hollins-Plantation Shopping Center. 5. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Meadow Creek, Section 3. I 6. Acceptance of Old Manor Drive and Old Manor Court, Plantation Estates into the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System. 532 February 23, 1988 -~~=~T _._-~..__._--_. --_._-------~_.__.~. ._..__._--,-_.._--_.,--~.._-_._-_._------_._---~_._--- -~ ,.- -', _._-' - .-- -_. --. ------ _. - ._~_._- - -- ~- ~ -'--~ ~ ~- -" - .-.--,---.. .--.--.- _._."~-~-~ ._.__.._._-_.~"'_._,.._------ -,,, -,-,- ._'",' -"-, --,,_. .-.,..- 7. Approval of a Raffle Permit for the Botetourt Jaycees. 8. Resolution from the Planning Commission recommending approval of acquisition of 5.177 acre tract for fire and rescue facilities in he Back Creek community planning area. 9. Approval to close out Va. Division of Historic Landmarks grant for roof replacement on the 01 County Courthouse 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authoriz d and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of aid items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuan to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Garrett after removing Ite 1 I for amendment and discussion, seconded by Supervisor Robers, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None Supervisor Garrett advised that Item 1 should be amended to reflect that Eugene Martin is replacing Joe Himes on the Grievance Panel. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve It m 1. seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garr tt NAYS: None A MEN D E D I RESOLUTION 22388-7.c REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF I I 533 February 23, 1988 HILL DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke ounty, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Resolution 6987-12.f requesting acceptance of ill Drive into the VDOT Secondary Road System is hereby escinded. 2. That this matter carne this day to be heard upon the roceedings therein and upon the application for Hill Drive, a road extending from Glade Creek Drive (Route 636), .79 miles east of Bonsack Road (Route 603) and extending in a outherly direction 0.29 miles to the cul-de-sac, pursuant to ection 33.1-72.1, Paragraph D and funded pursuant to Section 3.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as 3. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of irginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necessary asements for drainage as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 54, dated 16, 1975 and Deed Book 1269 Page 205 recorded on July of record in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's 4. That this Board does certify that this road was open to ublic use prior to January 1, 1976, at which time it was open to nd used by motor vehicles. 5,34 February 23, 1988 _,.__,_____.M___ --_._.__.~,,-_._--- ---.-.----..----,-'-.,.-..-,-..-..-.--,..--- -----_._--_._-----------,_.~----,--._--_._,_. .,-~-~-"..'-_.__..,,'''- -....-.-.-..... .. .-. - ---.--.------- -.-- --.----,-- - - _._.~----~-- --- ~-- ~_._ - _._____ - ._-'0- _ __ _ _'_ _._ _ __ '_'_'_" __ .." _._._._.__...._~___...., _._ _._. .._,.~. ,-..-..,. ,-~- . 5. That said road known as Hill Drive and which is sh wn on a certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be, and th same is hereby established as a public road to become a part of the state secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, on y from and after notification of official acceptance of said s reet or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Super isor Robers, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None RESOLUTION 22388-7.a REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF OLD MANOR DRIVE AND OLD MANOR COURT INTO THE VIRGI IA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter carne this day to be heard upon th proceedings herein, and upon the application of Old Manor Dr ve, from Lot 6, Block 2A to Lot 9, Block 2A of Plantation Estate , and Old Manor Court, from its intersection with Old Manor Dr ve to the cul-de-sac at Lot 14, Block 3 of Plantation Estates t be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easemen s and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said roads have been I I 535 February 23, 1988 edicated by virtue of a certain map known as Plantation Estates ubdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 9, of of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke ounty, Virginia, on May 22, 1986 and that by reason of the ecordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor onsent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property wners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said ight-of-way for drainage. 3. That said roads known as Old Manor Drive and Old Manor ourt which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this I be, and the same are hereby established as public oads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways n Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official cceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor and upon the following recorded vote: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett YS: None RESOLUTION 22388-7.d REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF AIRPOINT DRIVE AND AIRPOINT ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM I BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke unty, Virginia, as follows: r 536 February 23, 1988 '. __ ~___L _. .,.__ r- 1. That Resolution 6987-12.h is requesting accept a Airpoint Dr~ve d A' . an ~rpoint Road into the VDOT Secondary System is hereby rescinded. 2. That this matter came this day to be heard upon proCeedings therein and upon the application for Airpoint and Airpoint Road, a section of road extending ~rom Bent Mo ntain e Road (Route 221), 0.09 miles north of Tinsley Lane (Route 7 1), and extending in an easterly direction 0.28 miles to Airpoi Drive and 0.25 miles to Airpoint Road to a turn around, pur ant to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph C-1 and funded pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia of 19 0, as amended. Virginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necess 3. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of I easements for drainage as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 46, y dated July 9, 1965 of record in the Roanoke County Circuit Co rt Clerk's Office. public use prior to January 1, 1976, at which time it was ope to 4. That this Board does certify that this road was ope to and used by motor vehicles. 5. That said roads known as Airpoint Drive and Airpoin Road which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public roads to become a part of the state secondary system of highwa s I February 23, 1988 537 n Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official cceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department f Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor obers, and upon the following recorded vote: YES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett AYS: None N REi REPORTS I I The following reports were received and filed. 1. Accounts Paid for January 1988. 2. Board Contingency Fund 3. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 4. Capital Unappropriated Balance 5. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability as of anuary 31, 1988. 6. Financial Statements as of January 1, 1988. 7. Status of Starkey Road Improvement Project. Supervisor Johnson asked the staff to investigate ether the Capital Unappropriated Balance could be used for our ligation to the regional airport. He also asked for a listing, department, of how many unfilled positions exist in the Supervisor Nickens suggested that funds in the r 538 February 23, 1988 _ .. ~ ~_.__~~~. ~..' z ~_"'__"_"'____"'__._.__~__.,______._._,__.._.____~_._._.__.__._...___.~."._,.._.,.._____."_....._. ~-- -- .--- - -- _.- - - _._...~ . .._.-'".~ ,--,- ..-.'-.- '." ._.~- -~ ..-..-~---_. ''',--'- -.-...,---- Commissioner of Revenue's budget or funds in the Board Contingency Fund be used for a part-time person to work on finding vehicles without county decals. Mr. Hodge requested that he and the Commissioner of Revenue study this issue and brin back a report to the board. Supervisor Nickens moved that Mr. Hodge and the Commissioner of Revenue bring back to the B ard at the first meeting in April a program for enforcement of t e decal fee in Roanoke County. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by a unanimous voice vote. IN REi EXECUTIVE SESSION At 3:45 p.m., Supervisor Garrett moved to go into Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2,1-344 ) 1, 2, and 6, to to consider a personnel matter, to consider a r al estate matter and to discuss a legal matter. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garr tt NAYS: None IN RE i OPEN SESSION I I February 23, 1988 5~9 At 5:00 p.m., Supervisor Garrett moved to return to pen Session. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and arried by the following recorded vote: YES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett AYS: None N REi RECESS At 5:01 Chairman Garrett declared a dinner recess. I N REi RECOVENEMENT At 7:04 p.m. Chairman Garrett reconvened the meeting. N REi PUBLIC HEARINGS 288-1 Petition of Brambleton Medical Associates to amend the Roanoke County Land Use Plan and to rezone a 1.48 acre tract from R-1, Residential to B-1, Business to construct a parking lot, located south of 3142 Brambleton Avenue in the Cave Spring Magisterial District (CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 26, 1988) I Director of Planning Rob Stalzer announced that The lanning Commission has decided that future amendments to the 540 February 23, 1988 _'_ _.__ .__ _4_·__ --. - >'- .- .-- - _.- _ ..~·._..~U__"_ _ -.'. -_...~ ~.. ,,- - Land Use Plan will be considered concurrently with the propo ed rezoning. Mr. Stalzer pointed out that the present Land Use Plan must be amended to conform with the proposed rezoning. Mr. Stalzer presented the staff report stating tha the purpose for the rezoning was to construct a parking lot to s rve an existing office complex and a proposed addition to the co plex. The petitioners are in violation of the zoning setback regulations, but this is an administrative matter, separate rom the issues before the Board. The Land Use Plan designates t is property Neighborhood Conservation and in order to bring the plan into compliance it would be necessary to amend the Plan to Transition. The Planning Commission recommends approval of he both the Land Use Plan and the rezoning with proffered conditions. John Molumphy, attorney for Brambleton Medical Associates, requested a thirty day continuance on this petit on because they feel there are additional issues to be resolved before the Board should vote on this matter. Chairman Garrett responded that before a decision n the continuance would be made they would hear from the citiz ns who wished to speak. Speaking in opposition to the proposed Land Use Amendment and the rezoning were: I I 541 February 23, 1988 1. Irwin Holtzman, 3511 Forester Road S. W. spoke pposing the amendment of the Land Use Plan because of the mportance of maintaining the environment of their Greenwood orest neighborhood. 2. Allen Trigger, 3519 Forester Road S.W. spoke in pposition to the rezoning. His property is directly adjacent to he petitioner. 3. Ellen Holtzman, 3511 Forester Road S.W. spoke oncerning the violation of the buffer zone in the previous ezoning. I 4. Amy Collins, 3535 Forester Road S. W. voiced oncern for lowered property values, potential buglaries and ighting from the parking. 5. Horace McPherson, 3561 Forester Road, spoke in pposition also. Mr. Molumphy responded that the County as previously mended the Land Use Plan from Neighborhood Conservation to ransition. He also presented two letters in support of the ezoning. I Chairman Garrett advised that he did not feel it to continue this issue for another thirty days. Supervisor Robers moved to deny the rezoning. The was seconded by Supervisor Johnson. 542 February 23, 1988 __ ·_K__ _ _ ___"" - _.. _._~_.._. ._-~, -....- F _ ,_ _,_,~. ',.' ,h_~ ,_,~._.,._,,~"_ . _ c_ .'.._ __ In response to a question by Supervisor Nickens, C unty Attorney Paul Mahoney advised that both the Land Use Plan an the rezoning should be voted on separately. Supervisor Robers withdrew his motion for denial 0 the rezoning and moved to deny the Land Use Plan Amendment. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garr tt NAYS: None Supervisor Robers moved to deny the rezoning. Th following recorded vote: I motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garr~tt NAYS: None 288-2 Public Hearing on Ordinance amending Section 21-73 of the Roanoke County Code, "EXEMPTION FOR ELDERLY AND DISABLED PERSONS and reenacting same to increase the total combined income and total combined net worth County Attorney Paul Mahoney explained this was thE public hearing portion of the proposed ordinance amending thE code for elderly and disabled persons. The second reading 0 the ordinance will be held later in the meeting. The public hea ing will allow citizen comment. This ordinance changes the County II February 23, 1988 54S ode allowing exemption from additional real estate taxes to ncrease the total income provision from $18,000 to $22,000 and o change the net worth provision from $65,000 to $75,000. This ill take the County to the ceiling allowed by the General ssernbly. No citizens were present to speak to this proposed rdinance. 88-3 Public Hearing for citizen input on local community development and housing needs, and on the proposed application for COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING FOR TWEEDS. INC. economic development project. I Economic Development Specialist Brent Sheffler reported hat the County has an opportunity to apply for a Community evelopment Block Grant for TWEEDS, Inc. which will located on I he Roanoke County-Botetourt County site. This application will an opportunity for on-site and off-site improvements water and sewer extensions, acquisition and site grading. request is for $500,000 to cover these improvement. ach County will be applying for $250,000. Industrial access unding will be a separate request by Botetourt County. The ublic hearing is mandated to allow for citizen comment on this rant request and previous grant requests. It is projected that WEEDS will provide jobs for low to moderate income people. ,..- 544 February 23, 1988 _.. - .~- _ ----." ..- _. -.-.- - ..-.-" - -- -~ ---. --= =-. --F - -- - - - --.-..- - .- _. --_._- --- .. - ..- ._._n County Administrator asked what the cutoff date wa for application for these grant funds. Mr. Sheffler said the fi st application deadline is March 4, 1988 at 5:00 p.m. The seco d deadline is every month thereafter, but it is important to T EEDS to expedite this application. A second public hearing is als required for the other deadline. No one was present to speak on this issue. Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the resolution. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garr tt NAYS: None RESOLUTION 22388-8 AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF APPLICATION FOR 1988 VIRGINIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roane ke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, Roanoke County and Botetourt County will submi a 1988 regional application for Virginia Community Development Block Grant (VCDBG) funds, and WHEREAS, This regional project's name is the Tweed:, Inc. Economic Development Project, and ~ I I I I February 23, 1988 545 WHEREAS, Roanoke County will request $250,000 of VCDBG unds, and Botetourt County will request $250,000 in similar unding, and WHEREAS, Up to $300,000 from the Virginia Department of ransportation Industrial Access Fund Program will be used to rovide an access road to the project site, and WHEREAS, Up to 108 low and moderate income persons are rojected to receive employment from this project, and WHEREAS, Citizen participation requirements have been with through a duly publicized public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Roanoke County Supervisors authorizes the County Administrator to sign nd submit all appropriate information and documents necessary to onstitute an application for 1988 VCDBG funds. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor and upon the following recorded vote: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett YS: None Petition of GEORGE JACOBS To rezone a 0.678 acre tract from B-2, Business to M- 1, Industrial to assembly musical accessories, located at 6024 Williamson Road in the Hollins Magisterial District Assistant County Administrator Timothy Gubala reported 546 February 23, 1988 - - .....- .--... ..--~,_.- . ~ " "_W""_._____. "'_'_~__'__..,__,._,<. that this petition allows for an industry on what is conside ed Neighborhood Conservation. The Planning Commission felt tha this designation, made in 1985, was inaccurate and should be Transition. At the Planning Commission hearing there was citizens opposition concerning property values, dust, noise nd odor pollution. There are proffered conditions to the propo ed rezoning. The Planning Commission recommended approval 4 to O. Supervisor Johnson agreed that this property shoul not be designated Neighborhood Conservation. He advised that he did not want to include the condition that stated that the prope ty would revert to B-2 zoning should the proposed use be termin ted. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the rezoning ith I the first three proffered conditions only. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garr tt NAYS: None FINAL ORDER NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax aps as Parcel 38.06-2-2 and recorded in Deed Book 698 and legall described below, be rezoned from B-2 Business District to M- Industrial District I February 23, 1988 --- 547 ------ ---- ---------. I I BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be ransmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that e be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map f Roanoke County. BEGINNING at a point on the westerly side of U.S. Route No. 11 100.0 ft. (erroneously shown as "11 ft." in previous deed) southerly from the intersection of the westerly side of Route 11 and the southerly side of route 623, both extended; thence with a division line between Lots 12-B and 12-C, S. 78 degrees, l' 30" W. 200.17 feet to an iron on the line of Lot 11; thence N. 0 degrees 0' 30" W. 222.25 ft. to an old iron on route 623; thence with the southerly side of Route 623, S. 64 degrees 40' E. 181.29 ft. (erroneously shown as "193.73 ft." in previous deed), to the beginning of a curve; thence with a curve to the right, whose radius is 25 ft., an arc distance of 23.09 ft. to a point on the westerly side of Route 11; thence with Route 11, S. 11 degrees 58' 30" E. 87.56 ft to the place of BEGINNING, and BEING all of Lot 12-C according to a survey made for Captain's Grove Corporation showing a division of Lot 12, Block 1, Captain's Grove, which survey was made by T. P. Parker, S.C.E., July 16, 1962 attached to and a part of the Deed recorded in Deed Book 698, page 29, at page 31 in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia; and BEING the same property conveyed to Samuel Peters by deed recorded in 548 February 23, 1988 ._,~ ~_.__. .~._-- ---. - -~ --- -~, - - - - .- _. ._--_..... _'0' ''-0'__._",_"",.._ Deed Book 698, page 29, as hereinabove set forth. PROFFER OF CONDITIONS 1. The manufacturing activity on the property will nly be those allowed under Section 21-24-1.A, Items 4, 6, and 10 2. No outside storage of any materials either raw 0 finished. 3. Signage will be limited to surface mount on buil ing and use of existing sign standard on property. Sign will be no more than 32 sq. ft. and will be unlighted. 4. ~fte-~ðft±ft~-W±~~-rever~-~ð-B-2-~ðft±ft~-~ftðtlid-~fte þrðþð~ed-tl~ed-be-~erm±fta~ed~ (Deleted in motion to approve) 288-5 Petition of JONES AND JONES ARCHITECTS AND MEDICAL PROPERTIES ASSOCIATES to vacate a portion of a 25-foot right-of-way known as Jones Street from Peters Creek Road west approximately 170 feet in the Catawba Magisterial District. Mr. Gubala advised that no one present at the Planni g Commission was opposed to this petition. One resident reque ted that consideration be given to closing the remainder of Jone Street. A 20-foot easement will remain for water and sewer. Mr. Jones was present to answer questions. Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the petition. he motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garr tt NAYS: None FINAL ORDER I I I I 549 February 23, 1988 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that that the 25 foot right f way hereinabove described as Jones Street be permanently acation and abandoned. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be ransmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that his order be recorded by Petitioner along with the attache plat mong the land records. PROFFER OF CONDITIONS 1. The dedication of a 20 foot easement for water and ewer. 88-6 petition of BARBARA D. CARTWRIGHT to vacate portions of the cul-de-sac on ponderosa Circle in the Cave Spring Magisterial District Mr. Gubala advised that the Planning Commission reviewed his request and recommended unanimous approval. Mr. Terry, for the petitioner, was present. Supervisor Robers moved to approve the vacation. The was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the recorded vote: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett YS: None FINAL ORDER 550 February 23, 1988 __ __ ____~ _ A , -- ._~..- -- ---- .. -- - ..._,. --_.~. - _. -. ~ .._------ NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED That the turn around area beyond the fifty foot right-of-way hereinabove described an as shown in red (and cross hatched) on a plat attached hereto, be permanently vacated and abandoned. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order b transmitted to the Department of Development and that this be recorded by Petitioner along with the attached plat am on the land records of Roanoke County. 288-7 Petition of liNG HYO CHOI to rezone a .045 acre tract from B-1, Business to B-2 Business to operate a convenience store located at 4533 Brambleton Avenue in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. Mr. Gubala advised that this property is located i a Transitional Land Use category. There are five proffered conditions for use of the property. No citizens spoke in opposition at the Planning Commission meeting and they recommended approval 4 to 1. The attorney for the petitioner was present to ans r questions. Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the petition wi h proffered conditions. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors JOhnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garre t NAYS: None I I I I 551 February 23, 1988 FINAL ORDER NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned arcel of land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps s Parcel 86.08-4-11 and recorded in Deed Book 1269, page 1430 nd legally described below, be rezoned from B-1 Business istrict to B-2 Business District BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be ransmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that e be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map f Roanoke County. BEGINNING at a point at the intersection of the west side of U> S. Route 221 with the north side of Virginia Secondary Route No. 906; thence with the west side of Route No. 221, N. 28 degrees 25' E. 220.1 feet to an iron; thence with a new line through the J. L. Hoback property, N. 61 degrees 05'W. 91.4 feet to an iron; thence with the line of R. R. Thurman property, S. 29 degrees 03' W. 224.0 feet to an iron on the north side of Route No. 906; thence with the north side of Route No. 906, S. 63 degrees, 27' E. 94.0 feet to the Beginning and containing 0.47 acre, and being a southerly portion of the J. L. Hoback property and being as shown on map made by T. P. Parker, C. E., dated January 24, 1958, a copy of which is attached to that certain deed dated February 14, 1958, of record in the Clerk's office of the Circuit Court for the County of ~ L 552 February 23, 1988 __,__~ ·__._.__u'_ _~h'_'_ ~.._...,.- ,.~ -.. " - -----_."_._-~_._--.- - _. -- - .~- - _.-... - .....- ,- - Roanoke, Virginia, in Deed Book 596, page 111, Conveying said property from J. L. Hoback and wife to R. G. Arthur; and BEING the same property conveyed to H. James Hagan and Bernice M. Hagan, husband and wife, from Charles Lee Payne, et al., by deed dated March 11, 1982, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1181, page 1641. clinic or commercial kennel; clinic, hospital, hospital spec al undertaking establishment or funeral home; animal hospital, PROFFER OF CONDITION$ 1. Will not use temporary or portable signs. 2. Will not use property for new or used car deale hip. care or nursing home. 3. Will maintain the hedge and brush at the rear of he I residential tract. property serving as a natural buffer with the adjoining 4. No billboard advertising will be permitted. other on the pole holding the signs of the existing businesse . store; one on the face of the structure housing the store and the 5. Will place two signs on property for the convenie ce 288-8 Petition of HOBART COMPANIES. LTD. for a Use Not Provided For Permit to construct a complex consisting of office and retail space, warehousing and light manufacturing, located on the south side of Peters Creek Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. I February 23, 1988 553 ._---- Mr. Gubala reported there are a number of different uses rovided for in this complex. The site plan has been proffered. here was no citizen opposition to the proposal. There are six roffered conditions. and the Planning Commission recommended pproval 4 to O. Ed Natt, attorney for the petitioner, was resent to answer any questions. I Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the petition with roffered conditions. The motion was seconded by Supervisor ickens and carried by the following recorded vote: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett None FINAL ORDER NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned of land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps s Parcel 27.14-2-13 and recorded in Deed Book and legally below, be granted a Use Not Provided For Permit. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be ransmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that e be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map Roanoke County. I A 4.974 acre of land, generally located in the 6600 Block on the South side of Peters Creek Road, within the Catawba Magisterial District, and recorded as a portion 55~ February 23, 1988 - --- -- "__,. __~.., __"~,,.,,__ _.~"..__.._. _. ."".._~_ OH ,-" - -- ---- - .-..-. of Parcel 27.14-2-12 and a portion of Parcel 27.14-2-13, in the Roanoke County Tax Records. PROFFER OF CONDITIONS 1. Development will be in substantial conformity with the site plan of Ernie Rose, Inc., with a minimum of a 30 fo t buffer adjoining any residential property. 2. Uses to be limited to office, retail sales, serv ce industry uses together with warehousing and light manufactur ng as allowed in Section 21-24-1, M-1, Light Industrial Distric (A) (1), (3), (4), (5) and (6) of the Roanoke County Code. 3. Stand-alone sign shall not be greater than 48 sq are feet. 4. There shall be no outside storage of materials. 5. All lighting shall be directed away from the adjoining residential property. 6. All building shall be constructed with brick on he front thereof. 288-9 Petition of DOMINION BANKSHARES CORPORATION for a Special Exception Permit to operate an office on an 8.461 acre tract in an M-1 Industrial zoning district, located at 5673 Airport Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. Mr. Gubala advised this petition did not go Planning Commission. The zoning ordinance has previously be n I I 555 February 23, 1988 mended to allow for offices in M-1 Industrial districts with a pecial Exception Permit. This is a vacant building formerly sed by Stone Printing. Dominion Bankshares plans to use the uilding for a credit card operation. Supervisor Johnson expressed concern that the building as 2000 feet from a fire hydrant. Mr. Gubala responded this ould be studied as part of the site plan review. Supervisor Johnson moved to grant the Special Exception ermit. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and arried by the following recorded vote: I YES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett AYS: None 88-10 Petition of AKFER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC. AND KENNETH BOWLES to vacate and relocate a 20 foot drainage easements in Section 6 of Falling Creek Estates. Mr. Gubala advised that the purpose for the vacation is I there has been a house constructed on a lot that ncroaches an existing easement. There will be a new drainage asement that replaces the existing one. Jim Buchholtz, attorney petitioner, was present to answer any questions. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the vacation and The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and arried by the following recorded vote: 5{); & February 23, 1988 - - .'~,- - . --,..._~ .-.- ,"'_.'-".. -.-- _.. ---- AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garr tt NAYS: None FINAL ORDER NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED, that the drainage easement, hereinabove described as crossing over, on and thr ugh Lots, 2, 3, and 4, of Block 2, Section 6, Falling Creek Esta es as shown on a plat be permanently vacation, abandoned and relocated. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Department of Development and that this 0 der be recorded by Petitioner along with the attached plat among the land records of Roanoke County. 288-11 Public Hearing on the issuance of a WATER SYSTEM REVENUE BOND of the County in a principal amount not the exceed $975,000 to finance extensions of the County's existing water system Assistant County Administrator John Chambliss advi ed that this public hearing is a new state code requirement beginning July 1987. The actual amount of bonds that the Co nty is requesting from the Virginia Resources Authority is $960, which includes the projects of Valleypointe, Appalachian Pow r and the issuance cost of the bonds. The interest rate will approximately 7.09%. The bonds will be repaid with the reve I I 557 February 23, 1988 ------.--- -_._--- ---,--- rom the water system. Much of the money will be recovered from he off-site facility fees which will be collected from these two evelopments. After any citizen comment, staff is recommending of the prepared resolution. No citizens were present to this public hearing. County Administrator Elmer Hodge asked if the developer Valleypointe wanted to proceed with both Phase I and Phase II, ill it be necessary to corne back for approval of Phase II. Mr. responded that this included both phases of this I Supervisor Robers moved to approve the prepared esolution. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and by the following recorded vote: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett YS: None STAIN: Supervisor McGraw RESOLUTION 22388-5 OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF ITS $960,000 WATER SYSTEM REVENUE BOND, SERIES 1988A, AND SETTING FORTH THE FORM AND DETAILS THEREOF The County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County"), a political bdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, has applied for and I s received approval for a loan of $960,000 from the Virginia sources Authority ("Authority") to finance extensions of the 558 February 23, 1988 - ----..".- -- '. --. -,.-- -- _. . --- --- ....' '--"'-'-""_.'-'~'_._-,... County's existing water system. The County will issue its W ter System Revenue Bond, Series 1988A ("Local Bond"), in the ori inal principal amount of $960,000, and sell the Local Bond to the Au- thority to evidence the County's obligation to repay the loa. The foregoing arrangements are reflected in the fo low- ing documents, forms of which have been presented to this me ting and filed with the County's documents: (1) Financing Agreem nt, dated as of March 1, 1988 ("Financing Agreement"), between t e Authority and the County, together with a form of the Local ond attached thereto, and (2) Preliminary Reoffering Statement, ated February 9, 1988 ("Preliminary Reoffering Statement") . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Sup rvi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that: 1. Definitions. Unless otherwise defined, all ca ital- ized terms used in this Resolution shall have the meanings s t forth in the Financing Agreement. 2. Authorization of Bond. The issuance of a reve ue bond of the County to be known as the County of Roanoke, Vi gin- ia, Water System Revenue Bond, Series 1988A, is authorized. The Local Bond shall be issued in the original principal amount f $960,000 and sold to the Authority for the purchase price se forth in the Financing Agreement, which purchase price is he eby determined to be in the best interests of the Commonwealth 0 Virginia and the County. I I 559 February 23, 1988 3. Authorization of Financina Aareement. The Finan- ing Agreement is approved. The Chairman of the County's Board f Supervisors ( "Cha i rman " ) is authorized to execute on behalf of he County the Financing Agreement in substantially the form sub- itted to this meeting, with such changes, insertions or omis- ions as may be approved by the Chairman, whose approval shall be videnced conclusively by the execution and delivery thereof. he Chairman, the Clerk of the County's Board of Supervisors "Clerk"), the Treasurer of the County ("Treasurer"), the County dministrator, the Assistant County Administrator - Management ervices ("Assistant County Administrator") and the Director of tilities of the County ("Director") are each authorized to exe- ute and deliver on behalf of the County such other instruments, ocuments or certificates, and to do and perform such things and cts, as they shall deem necessary or appropriate to carry out he transactions authorized by this Resolution or contemplated by he Local Bond or the Financing Agreement, and all of the' fore- oing, previously done or performed by the Chairman, the Clerk, he Treasurer, the County Administrator, the Assistant County Director, are in all respects approved, rat- I I fied and confirmed. 4. Details of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be ssued as a fully registered bond without coupons in the denomina- ion of $960,000 and shall be dated March 1, 1988. The Local l_ 560 February 23, 1988 _. - --- - - .-. ..--. -,-- Bond shall bear interest at the rates indicated below, and t e principal amount thereof shall be payable, subject to prior e- demption, on November 1 in each of the years and in the paym amounts set forth below: Principal Payment Amount $20,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 30,000 30,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 40,000 40,000 45,000 45,000 50,000 55,000 60,000 65,000 65,000 70,000 80,000 85,000 Principal Payment Due Date November 1, 1988 November 1, 1989 November 1, 1990 November 1, 1991 November 1, 1992 November 1, 1993 November 1, 1994 November 1, 1995 November 1, 1996 November 1, 1997 November 1, 1998 November 1, 1999 November 1, 2000 November 1, 2001 November 1, 2002 November 1, 2003 November 1, 2004 November 1, 2005 November 1, 2006 November 1, 2007 November 1, 2008 Inte est Ra e 4 5% 5 0 5 2 5 4 5 6 5 8 6 0 6 2 6 35 6 5 6 65 6 8 6 9 7 0 7 1 7 2 7 3 7 35 7 4 7 45 7 5 Each principal installment of the Local Bond shall bear interest at its respective interest rate from the date of th Local Bond until such principal payment amount is paid. In ddi- tion, the County shall pay a late payment charge as provided in the Financing Agreement if any payment of principal or inter st I is not received within five days of its due date. Interest the Local Bond shall be computed on the basis of a year of 3 0 II February 23, 1988 561 ays and twelve 30-day months. The principal of and premium, if ny, and interest on the Local Bond shall be payable at the place nd in the manner provided in the Financing Agreement. Subject to the right of the County to apply Revenues to he payment of Operation and Maintenance Expense and to the provi- ions of the Financing Agreement, the Revenues are hereby pledged o secure the payment of the principal of and premium, if any, nd interest on the Local Bond and the performance of the obligations under the Financing Agreement. II The principal of and premium, if any, and interest on Bond shall be payable in lawful money of the United America only from the Revenues and other sources ledged to the payment thereof as provided in this Resolution and Financing Agreement. 5. Prepayment of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be to prepayment as set forth in the Financing Agreement. 6. Acceleration of Local Bond. If an Event of Default have occurred and be continuing, the principal amount of nd accrued interest on the Local Bond may be declared immediate- y due and payable by written notice to the County. 7. Execution of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be igned by the manual or facsimile signature of the Chairman and e Treasurer, and the corporate seal of the County or a facsim- 'Ie of such seal shall be affixed thereon and shall be attested I 562 February 23, 1988 ~. - --_. ~- ._- .... ~-- ,,~-- -- ..- ~=~~~~~~~-F -, #_- - -- .._.~. by the manual or facsimile signature of the Clerk. In case any officer whose signature shall appear on the Local Bond shal cease to be such officer before the delivery of the Local B nd, such signature shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient fraIl purposes the same as if he or she had remained in office un such delivery. The Local Bond may be signed by such person as at the actual time of the execution thereof shall be the pr er officers to sign such Local Bond although at the date of de 'very of such Local Bond such persons may not have been such offi rs. 8. Form of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be s b- stantially in the form attached as Exhibit A to the Financin Agreement, with such appropriate variations, omissions and i ser- tions as permitted or required by this Resolution or the Fin n- cing Agreement. There may be endorsed on the Local Bond suc legend or text as may be necessary or appropriate to conform to any applicable rules and regulations of any governmental aut 0- rity or any usage or requirement of law with respect thereto 9. Reaistration, Transfer and Exchange. The Coun hereby appoints the Clerk as its registrar and transfer agen to keep books for the registration and transfer of the Local Bo and to make such registration and transfers under such reason ble regulations as the County may prescribe. Upon surrender for transfer or exchange of the Loca Bond at the office of the Clerk, the County shall execute and I I -- - ---..- -_.~ I I February 23, 1988 563 _0·- _._ _ eliver in the name of the transferee or transferees a new Local ond or Bonds for a principal amount equal to the Local Bond sur- endered and of the same form and maturity and bearing interest t the same rate as the Local Bond surrendered, subject in each ase to such reasonable regulations as the County may prescribe. f presented for transfer, exchange, redemption or payment, the ocal Bond shall be accompanied by a written instrument or instru- ents of transfer or authorization for exchange, in form and sub- tance reasonably satisfactory to the County, duly executed by he registered owner or by his or her duly authorized attorney-in- act or legal representative. The Local Bond may not be regis- ered to bearer. A new Local Bond delivered upon any transfer or ex- shall be a valid obligation of the County, evidencing the ame debt as the Local Bond surrendered, shall be secured by this esolution and the Financing Agreement and entitled to all of the ecurity and benefits hereof to the same extent as the Local Bond urrendered. 10. Charaes for Exchanae or Transfer. No charge shall for any exchange or transfer of the Local Bond, but the ounty may require payment by the holder of the Local Bond of a sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge that be imposed in relation thereto. 564 February 23, 1988 . -,-~-_._.- - _..- ______._.__..__~_....._____ ·'·.e __, ~emDorarv TVDAW i.. -- r LLAn Looal aQ~. initially issue the Local Bond in typewritten form. Bond is issued in typewritten form, upon the written the registered Owner of the Local Bond and upon surrender Local Bond in typewritten f h orm, t e County shall prOmptly pare, execute and deliver to such registered owner a Local in printed form of the same maturity and interest rate and the same principal amount as the typewritten Local Bond. priate variations, omissions and insertions may be Local Bond to facilitate printing. --- - ~-- .- -_.~- - - 12. M of the If the Local Bond has been mutilated, lost, stolen or the County shall execute and deliver a new Local Bond I date and tenor in exchange and substitution for, ery to the County and cancellation of, such mutilated Local or in lieu of and in substitution for such lost, stolen or de stroyed Local Bond; provided, however, that the County shall cute, authenticate and deliver a new Local Bond only tered owner thereof has paid the reasonable expenses and char of the County in connection therewith and, in the case of a 1 stolen or destroyed Local Bond (i) has filed with the County i- dence satisfactory to it that such Local Bond was lost, or destroyed and that the holder of the Local Bond was the regis tered owner thereof and (ii) has furnished to the County indem I 565 February 23, 1988 ity satisfactory to it. If the Local Bond has matured, instead f issuing a new Local Bond, the County may pay the same without urrender thereof upon receipt of the aforesaid evidence and in- emnity. I 13. Preliminary Reofferina Statement. The inclusion f the information with respect to the County contained in the ection "Roanoke County" in the Preliminary Reoffering Statement, repared in connection with the reoffering and sale of the Corre- ponding Bonds (as defined in the Financing Agreement), is hereby atified and confirmed and the use of such information in final orm in the Reoffering Statement of the Authority is hereby autho- ized and approved; provided, however, such information contained n the Reoffering Statement shall be reviewed and approved by the ssistant County Administrator before the distribution of the eoffering Statement. 14. Filina of Resolution: Notice. The Chairman and are each hereby authorized and directed to file or ause to be filed a certified copy of this Resolution with the ircuit Court of Roanoke County pursuant to Sections 15.1-199 and of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and within thereafter to publish once in a newspaper of general irculation in the County a notice setting forth (1) in brief and eneral terms the purpose for which the Local Bond is to be 'ssued and (2) the principal amount of the Local Bond. I 566 February 23, 1988 -- .--.---- - --.---. - -."--- ~- ~- .,_.- - -, .._~-- . _ ,._, _._._.,. ·u,_ > . __~. 15. Conflictina Resolutions. All parts of resolu ions of the Board which are in conflict with this Resolution are ere- by rescinded and repealed. 16. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take e fect immediately. On motion of Supervisor Robers, seconded by Superv sor Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw 288-12 Public Hearing for citizen comment on authorization of the Treasurer to issue up to $8 MILLION REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTES to cover operational cash deficits Mr. Chambliss advised that a public hearing must b held before issuing any bonds or notes on behalf of the Coun y. In 1987, the County had to borrow $10 million to cover casua cash deficits experienced by the County because of the peak seasons for collecting revenue. Most County revenue is rece ved by December 5th and by June 5th for real estate and personal property taxes and auto decal fees. It is anticipated that t will be necessary to borrow only $8 million even though the egal advertisement stated $10 million. Staff recommends approval of the proposed resolution after hearing any citizen comment. I I 561 February 23, 1988 Mr. Hugh Key, 5355 Black Bear Lane, opposed this type f borrowing, pointing out that this has only happened recently. e asked why it is now necessary to borrow the money when it was ot done for so many years. He asked how much was being spent in elation to each dollar of revenue increase. Supervisor Johnson pointed out that in the past the ounty could utilize interest on capital money that had not been pent to meet these problems. The federal law has changed, and he County can no longer use these funds. Mr. J. F. Walker, 3313 Stonehenge Square, asked for a I ationale of expenses for the $8 Million. He expressed concern t the expenses of moving public safety functions to Southview chool. He advised that he had not receive a written response to is previous questions concerning this move. Mr. Hodge advised hat a written response had recently been sent to him and he hould be receiving it shortly. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the prepared esolution. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and arried by the following recorded vote: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett None I RESOLUTION 22388-6 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTES IN THE AMOUNT OF UP TO $8,000,000 568 February 23, 1988 ._._ - _,_ - '__.,0 ___...__ _._ -.. ~-,~.-.,-_.._- AND APPROVING THE FORM AND DETAILS THEREOF ___._.__o_.._ _. ...,._ WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors (the "Board") 0 the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County") has determined t t it is necessary and expedient to borrow $8,000,000 and to issu its revenue anticipation notes in an amount not to exceed $8,000 000 (the "Notes") to meet casual cash flow deficits of the Count ; and WHEREAS, the County desires to specify the form a details of the Notes and authorize the County Administrator 0 solicit bids from a limited number of potential investors f purchase of such Notes. the I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Su rvi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The Board of the County determines that it is dvis- able to contract a debt and issue and sell the Notes in an gre- gate principal amount of $8,000,000. The issuance and sale f the Notes are authorized. The proceeds from the sale of Notes shall be used to meet casual cash flow deficits of County. 2. The Notes shall be issued in bearer form, wit ut privilege of registration and without coupons, in substanti ly the form attached as Exhibit A. The Notes shall be dated March 14, 1988; shall be issued in denominations of $25,000; I I II II 569 February 23, 1988 hall be numbered N-1 and upward, sequentially; shall bear inter- st at a rate to be set by a subsequent resolution of this Board ayable at maturity; and shall mature on June 13, 1988. The otes shall not be subject to payment or redemption before matu- ity. 3. The full faith and credit of the County are pledged o the payment at maturity of the principal of and interest on he Notes. Unless other funds are lawfully available and appro- riated for the timely payment of the Bonds, there shall be evied, without limitation as to rate or amount, and collected in ccordance with law, an annual ad valorem tax on all taxable pro- erty in the County subject to local taxation sufficient to pro- ide for payment of the principal of and interest on the Notes at 4. The County Administrator and Treasurer of the are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Notes, Treasurer is hereby authorized to affix or imprint the the County on the Notes. The form of execution, imprint- ng of the seal and attestation may be by facsimile; provided, owever, if the signatures of the County Administrator and Trea- urer are both by facsimile, the Notes shall not be valid until thenticated by the manual signature of the Paying Agent. In any officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signa- re shall appear on any Note shall cease to be such officer be- r- 570 February 23, 1988 - _._.._-."----_._._._~-----~ ,. --.---..'-- - ."-~ - --- fore the delivery of the Notes, such signature or such facs' ile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes he same as if he or she had remained in office until such deli rYe Any Note may bear the facsimile signature of or may be sign by such persons as at the actual time of its execution are the ro- per officers to sign such Note although at the date of deli ry of such Note such persons may not have been such officers. pon receipt of payment therefor, the Treasurer of the County or uch agent as may be designated, shall issue and deliver the Not to the purchaser or purchasers thereof. The officers and agen of the County are further authorized and directed to do all ac required by the Notes and by this Resolution for the full, nc- tual and complete performance of all things necessary for t 's borrowing. 5. Crestar Bank is appointed as Paying Agent for he Notes. The principal of and interest on the Notes shall be ay- able in lawful money of the United States upon surrender of he I Notes on the maturity date at the principal corporate trust office of the Paying Agent in Richmond, Virginia. 6. The Board agrees on behalf of the County that he sted the ry ts I proceeds from the issuance and sale of the Notes will be in and expended as set forth in the Non-Arbitrage Certificate County to be delivered at the time of the issuance and deli of the Notes and that the County will comply with the coven I I 571 February 23, 1988 nd representations contained therein. Further, the County shall omply with the reporting requirements of Section 149(e) of the nternal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. 7. The officers and advisors of the County are autho- ized to solicit from a limited number of sophisticated investors ids to purchase the Notes. 8. The officers and agents of the County are autho- ized and directed to take such further action as may be neces- ary or convenient in connection with the issuance, sale and de- ivery of the Notes and all actions previously taken by such offi- ers and agents in connection therewith are ratified and con- irmed. 9. The appropriate officers and agents of the County authorized and directed to immediately cause a certified copy f this Resolution, setting forth the form and details of the otes, to be filed with the Circuit Court of the County pursuant o Section 15.1-199 and 15.1-212 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, s amended, and the notice required by Section 15.1-199 of the Virginia of 1950, as amended, to be published. 10. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor and upon the following recorded vote: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett None r 572 February 23, 1988 .. .~ - -- ,-_. . .-_._..~ - .-- ,-_. ,- '--'" -..'-' ---..,---. _.. .' ~ 288-13 Public Hearing on the issuance of GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS not to exceed $3,985,000 to assist in financing renovations and improvements to Back Creek Elementary School and Bent Mountain Elementary School Superintendent of Schools Bayes Wilson reported t t these bonds are for the additions to these two schools and be borrowed from the Virginia Public School Authority. Bec se of the expected growth in this area of the County it will b necessary to renovate both schools. Supervisor Johnson asked when the Virginia Public I School Authority issued bonds. Mr. Wilson responded there' a spring and fall issue. Supervisor Johnson advised that the is usual a decrease in the interest rate during a presidential ear. He felt there might be a more favorable rate in the fall asked what impact this would have on the progress of the renovations. Mr. Wilson advised that if they waited until ll, they would have at least one or two payments to the contrac rs, and would have to ask for temporary borrowing to meet these payments. Supervisor Johnson suggested using bond funds earmarked for renovations to William Byrd Junior High Schoo paying it back from a fall bond issue when rates might be b Mr. Hodge advised that he did not think the bond referendum could be used that way. Donna Lane, President of the Back Creek PTA, spoke in suppo and ter. unds of I I 573 February 23, 1988 he proposed bond issuance. She felt that the work must begin his summer and the County should not wait until the fall bond ssue. She described the problems of the overcrowded conditions t the school. Mr. Chambliss advised that the Board could defer action ntil the fall and make a loan from other funds. He did not feel he money could come from the bond referendum funds without a alidation process. Supervisor Robers expressed concern that the ounty would be taking a risk that the interest rates could be igher in the fall. Supervisor Johnson advised that the state had taken the eiling off literary loan fund limits, and asked if the County auld utilize this source of revenue. Mr. Wilson responded that hese funds take 18 months and the County would have to wait ntil then to get the money. Mr. Wilson reported that they must et the Virginia Public School Authority know by March 3rd if hey intend to borrow the money. Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the prepared esolution. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw. upervisor Nickens asked if this item could be continued to a meeting to allow the staff time to investigate other for borrowing the money. The motion was defeated by the recorded vote: Supervisors McGraw, Garrett 574 February 23, 1988 -- -,.__._--_._.._-~~-~--,-._-~'.._---_..,-_._.-.._.~~ __ ·_~~_.__._'N ___ ____ --, .,-- _. .,._.~--~-_.~-_....- -.--" --~~-,--.. .-....,. NAYS: Supervisors Robers, Nickens PASS: Supervisor Johnson Supervisor Nickens moved that the staff study the alternatives and that the Board continue this public hear in to Monday, February 29, at 8 a.m. for a decision. The motion s seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYE S : Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garr tt let NAYS: None Mr. Hodge told those citizens present that them know what action takes place on February 29th. IN RE i FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizin the conve ance of sur 1 f re 1 estate to establish road ri ht-of-wa for Meadewood Dr· e and Ouail Place: Supervisor Johnson moved to approve first the ordinance. No one was present to speak on this The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried b the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Gar tt I NAYS: None I I 575 February 23, 1988 N RE; SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES ount 1 . Code Ordinance amendina Section 21-73 of the Roanoke "Exem tion for Elderl and Disabled Persons " and eenactin same to increase the total combined income and total ombined net worth rovisions: No one was present to speak to his ordinance and a public hearing had been held earlier for itizen comment. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the ordinance. The otion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the allowing recorded vote: YES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett AYS: None N RE; ADJOURNMENT Supervisor Garrett moved to adjourn the meeting to ebruary 29, 1988 at 8 a.m. for the purpose of continuing Public earing 288-13. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens nd carried by the following recorded vote: YES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett None ~1 () February 23, 1988 -'.--.-.--'-_..~.---_._~,- ~_. -"- ~ -_.- - -----..-.-..---- --. ----- ------------.-.----...---..-....--..--..,..----.-,.- .-~'-. --.-- --,--,--'. t1- ~ú..(ø- Lee GarJrett, Chairman ~ -:: I I