7/22/1986 - Regular
,,!
16
__·,____·_e__·_.__ _"
_.~ k,_"__ .__.'_ ._ ___. <.__ . ""~_,,__. ....
._._---~-~-~.,-~._.."..
~_._,......_".__._-~,+. ----_._,.__.>---_._.._-~_.-~.-.._._...-
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Cente
3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24015
July 22, 1986
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, met this da y at the Roanoke County
Administration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday, and the
second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of July, 1986.
IN RE:
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Brittle called the meeting to order at 3:00
p.m. The roll call was taken.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chairman Alan H. Brittle; Vice-Chairman Bo
Johnson; Supervisors Lee Garrett, Harry C.
Nickens, and Steven A. McGraw
MEMBERS ABSENT:
None
STAFF PRESENT:
Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John
M. Chambliss, Assistant County
Administrator of Management Services; John
R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
of Public Facilities; Timothy W. Gubala,
Assistant County Administrator of Communit
Development; Diane Hyatt, Finance
Director; Reta R. Busher, Budget Director;
Tommy Fuqua, Fire and Rescue Chief; Brent
Sheffler, Department of Community
Development; George Garrettson, Library
Director; Lowell Gobble, VPI & SU Extensio
Agent; D. Keith Cook, Director of Human
Resources; John Willey, Real Estate
Assessor; Gary Huff, Public Facilities;
Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning; Jim
Lehe, Planning; Sally Turner, Public
Information Officer; Bobbie Hall, Deputy
Clerk; Mary Allen, County Administrator's
staff
IN RE:
OPENING CEREMONIES
~, / I 7
July 22, 1986
The invocation was given by Reverend Bill Smithwick of
the Baptist Children's Home. The Pledge of Allegiance was
recited by all present.
IN RE:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS
Mr. Hodge introduced Mr. Rick Weeks of the Virginia
Innovation Group. Mr. Weeks reported to the Board that the
Virginia Innovation Group is an association of local governments
and corporations working together to cause productivity increase
and cost reduction services to the public sector. He also
presented a folder of information concerning the group to each
board member.
Mr. Hodge also requested Tommy Fuqua to update the
Board on the chemical spill at IT&T. Mr. Fuqua reported that the
chemical, which leaked from a truck which arrived at the IT&T
plant today, was a paint thinner, a non-toxic vapor.
Approximately 118 people were affected by the leak and were
transported to the hospital. Most of the victims were treated
and released but a few were held at the hospital for observation.
Mr. Hodge commended Mr. Fuqua and his staff for their
efficiency in handling this situation.
IN RE:
REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF
AGENDA ITEMS
Mr. Hodge requested that Item Fl, Request to enter into
a Firefighting Mutual Aid agreement with Botetourt County, be
deferred for four to five weeks to allow staff to work out
technicalities that have recently developed.
Mr. Hodge also requested that Item N 10, Public hearing
to amend the ordinance establishing new connection fees for water
service be deferred for two weeks.
t·~,
18
July 22, 1986
---".__._-_._-----,._--_._-_.__..-.._---~_..-..._,--'".._--_.",-"."'_..._,,----~--_.-.._.,..__..--_...,..,.._,----~_._-
_"_ ~. _N _ø.~__~ _,_,q" _, _.___._
IN RE:
PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS
Chairman Brittle presented a resolution of appreciatio
to Hope Shrewsbury upon her retirement from Roanoke County.
Chairman Brittle moved to approve the resolution. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens.
RESOLUTION 7-22-86-157 EXPRESSING THE
APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO HOPE V. SHREWSBURY
FOR FOURTEEN YEARS OF DEDICATED SERVICE
TO ROANOKE COUNTY
WHEREAS, Hope V. Shrewsbury was first employed on Apri
11, 1972 as a Library Assistant at the Headquarters Library; and
WHEREAS, for many years she was responsible for
providing a film program for Senior Citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation
and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to Hope V
Shrewsbury for fourteen years of capable, loyal, and dedicated
service to Roanoke County.
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its bes
wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement.
On motion of Supervisor Brittle, seconded by Supervisor Nickens
and upon the following roll call vote:
AYES: Supervisors Garrett, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw, and Brittl
NAYS: None
IN RE: CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
Mr. Gordon Stitcher of Trellis Garden Center at
Tanglewood Mall was present to request that if the Board set a
mandatory water conservation policy, that the policy be amended
to provide for businesses such as his that depend on the ability
to water their plants.
þ: 19
July 22, 1986
IN RE:
NEW BUSINESS
1. Request to Enter into a Firefighting Mutual Aid
Agreement with Botetourt County - Upon request of Mr. Hodge, this
item was deferred for four to five weeks.
2. Presentation of the Financial Trend Analysis - Mr.
Chambliss presented the Financial Trend Analysis report to the
Board. This report will enable formulation of an effective
budget policy and forecasting of revenue and expenditure
requirements. After the presentation of this report, Chairman
Brittle requested a work session in September to discuss this
document in more detail. He also directed the Board members to
contact the office of Management Services with their questions on
the report before the work session.
3. Approval of Library Conversion Grant from the State
of Virginia - Mr. George Garrettson, Library Director, was
present to request that the Board approve this grant. He
reported that this system will permit the County libraries to be
included in the data bank located in Richmond, which will provide
a microfiche cataloging system. With this system, the County
will have a listing of all books throughout the County library
system and throughout the state system. Mr. Garrettson reported
that there will be no fiscal impact for the current fiscal year,
however the cost to maintain the microfiche catalog beginning
fiscal year 1987/88 will be $10,000. Also, in the future, an
on-line service to the data bank may be established at a cost of
$13,000 based on current costs.
Supervisor Nickens moved to concur with the staff
recommendation to approve the receipt of the Library Conversion
Grant. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried
by a unanimous roll call vote.
t· 20
July 22, 1986
- ,.-- . 'p' -, --- _ _·_~·,'fl__··"_
_.~-_.__.~.._.-..,.. ...'. -. ...-."...... ..--".-- --.--
4. Cancellation of GRTC Bus Routes to the Starke and
Mcvitty Area and provision of the Service by CORTRAN - Mr. Gary
Huff, Assistant Director of Buildings and Grounds, reported to
the Board that the County currently has a contract with the
Greater Roanoke Transit Company to provide extended bus routes t
the Tanglewood, Starkey, and McVitty areas. Ridership has
significantly decreased in the McVitty and Starkey routes, with
the most significant decrease in the McVitty route. Since
Roanoke County must subsidize these two routes, (Tanglewood rout
is self-sufficient) and since some routes in Salem have been
reduced causing an increase in County funding, Mr. Huff and his
staff recommended that the McVitty route be cancelled and staff
be authorized to monitor the ridership of the Starkey route. If
this route continues to decline, staff requested authority to
cancel this route. He also reported that the cancellation of th
McVitty route will reduce operating expenses for Public
Transportation by $2,000, which will allow more funding to
CORTRAN for purchased services only.
Supervisor Brittle moved to cancel only the McVitty
route on September 1, 1986. The motion was seconded by
Supervisor Johnson and carried by a unanimous roll call vote.
5. Cooperative Ventures for the Development of
Southwest Industrial Park - Mr. Brent Sheffler of the Department
of Development reported to the Board that the County has an
opportunity to establish an industrial park in southwest county
through a deed transfer to Roanoke County for three years. The
park would consist of approximately 16.1 acres. There are two
companies presently interested in the property, one of which is
considering a 3 acre parcel and the other is considering a one 0
two acre parcel. Mr. Sheffler reported that the property needs
to be improved by water and sewer and an industrial access road
to the property. The industrial access road will cost
approximately $125,000 and the cost of water and sewer will be
21
July 22, 1986
approximately $65,000. The funding for the water and sewer will
come from the Economic Development fund and the funding for the
industrial access road has been approved by the Virginia
Department of Highways and Transportation to come from the
Industrial Access Fund. In order to claim these funds, however,
qualifying manufacturing or processing operations must locate
within the park. The cost to Roanoke County could range from
$0.00 to $190,000. However, there is potential to develop three
or four industrial units generating well over $50,000 per year in
tax revenue and over 50 new jobs.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve staff's
recommendation to authorize the County Administrator to execute
an agreement with Corrugated Container Corporation and the
Higginbotham family, upon review by the County Attorney and the
staff, as to form and content. The motion was seconded by
Supervisor McGraw and carried by a unanimous roll call vote.
6. Assessment of Agricultural Drought Situation in
Roanoke County - Mr. Lowell Gobble, VPI & SU Extension Agent, was
present requesting that the Board approve a resolution declaring
an emergency throughout Roanoke County pursuant to Section
3.1-22.15 of the Code of Virginia due to the severe drought
condition. The approval of this resolution will be the first
step in gaining any assistance for farmers in the County. The
crop and dollar losses to Roanoke County farmers are already
serious and the Roanoke County Food and Agricultural Committee
has estimated that losses may exceed $1 million. He reported
that after the approval of this resolution, the State may request
the Federal Government for assistance for farmers to qualify for
low interest loans and purchase of feed materials, as well as
qualify for any other federal drought assistance programs
available.
Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the prepared
resolution. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens.
22
July 22, 1986
-'--"""~-~'"-"~-__'_".'_""'_ ~__.__.__~ ··.····_._.·_w_,~_._~
------
. --~^' -...--".--.--..
RESOLUTION 7-22-86-161 DECLARING A
STATE OF EMERGENCY THROUGHOUT ROANOKE
COUNTY AND PETITIONING THE GOVERNOR OF
THE COMMONWEALTH TO DECLARE AN
EMERGENCY AND REQUEST THAT THE FEDERAL
FARMER EMERGENCY PROGRAMS BE MADE
AVAILABLE TO ROANOKE COUNTY
WHEREAS, Roanoke County has suffered from severe
drought; and
WHEREAS, drought conditions in this agricultural area
have caused major damage to corn, hay, pasture, vegetables,
apples, peaches, and nursery crops; and
WHEREAS, estimated losses in agricultural crops may
exceed $1,000,000; and
WHEREAS, crop damages continue to increase daily due t
the need for water; and
WHEREAS, there is a critical need to assist the farmer
as a result of the extreme weather conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors that a state of emergency is declared by th
Board of Supervisors in Roanoke County on July 22, 1986; the
Honorable Gerald L. Baliles, Governor of the Commonwealth is
petitioned by the Board of Supervisors to declare that an
emergency exists in Roanoke County; and that the Governor is
further petitioned to request the President of the United States
or the Secretary of Agriculture to recognize the Roanoke County
emergency situation and make the federal farmer emergency
programs available to those who need them in Roanoke County.
On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Nickens
and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Garrett, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw, and Brittl
NAYS: None
7. Authorization to Settle Pending Litigation:
Roanoke County v. Frank E. Sellers, et al. - Mr. Paul Mahoney
reported to the Board that an offer has been negotiated to settl
this litigation which concerns the County's attempt to recover
J"'¡ 2 3
July 22, 1986
its costs and expenses for work undertaken to alleviate the
public danger and nuisances of the Westward Lake Dam from Mr.
Frank Sellers and related corporate entities. The settlement
requires the defendants to pay the sum of $17,000 and convey Lots
59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, and 65 of Westward Lake Estates (free and
clear of all liens except delinquent taxes) to the County. Both
parties would execute mutual releases which would conclude the
litigation.
Supervisor Nickens inquired about the assessment of the
properties being conveyed to the County. Mr. Mahoney reported
that two parcels have been assessed at the approximate value of
$1,500 and the other remaining parcels at approximately $500.
Supervisor McGraw requested more information on the
parcels before authorizing the staff to proceed with the sale of
the parcels.
Supervisor McGraw moved to approve staff recommendation
to settle pending litigation and that the Board receive more
information on the lots in question before authorizing their sale.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle
Supervisor Johnson inquired about payment of attorney's
fees. Mr. Mahoney reported that the attorney's fees will be paid
out of the County Attorney's budget.
Chairman Brittle called for a vote on Supervisor
McGraw's motion. The motion carried by a unanimous roll call
vote.
.
8. Authorization for the Roanoke County School Board
to Apply for a Supplemental Literary Fund Loan for Construction
of the Cave Spring High School Multipurpose Room and Industrial
~rts Lab - Mr. Homer Duff, Director of Finance for Roanoke County
Schools, reported to the Board that this supplemental loan is
necessary due to unforeseen complications. He reported that
walls and sewer lines have had to be moved, excavation has been
24
July 22, 1986
, -"~'~'~-""'--"----'" --",'-'.-«' ".-..-
necessary, and the installation of an elevator was also
necessary.
Supervisor Johnson asked why the entire amount
was not requested at the first request for application. Mr. Duff
reported that in order to receive a 3% loan instead of a 4 1/2%
loan, there was not enough time to obtain more detailed
information from an architect and the School Board had to use
their best estimate on what amount of funding would be needed.
Chairman Brittle directed Mr. Hodge to set up a meetin
through Bayes Wilson with the School Board to discuss the
possibility of using the administration staff to work with the
School Board on their projects.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve Mr. Duff's request
to apply for a supplemental literary Fund loan. The motion was
seconded by Supervisor Brittle and carried by a unanimous roll
call vote.
IN RE:
REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Request for a Public Hearinq to Establish an Annua
Reassessement Program - Mr. John Willey, Real Estate Assessor,
requested that the Board approve a public hearing to be held to
establish an annual reassessment program. He reported that an
ordinance must be adopted in order to institute this program.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the public hearing
request. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and
carried by a unanimous roll call vote.
IN RE:
APPOINTMENTS
1. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeal -
Supervisor Nickens nominated Mr. John Brownlee.
25
July 22, 1986
IN RE:
REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
Supervisor Johnson - Supervisor Johnson directed John
Hubbard to prepare a report for the August 12, 1986, Board of
Supervisors meeting on connecting the North Lakes water system to
Roanoke City lines because of the hardness in the present North
Lakes system.
Supervisor McGraw - Supervisor McGraw suggested that
the County consider phasing out present County wells with the
hardness problem and hooking on to City lines, especially if the
water referendum is passed by the voters.
IN RE:
CONSENT AGENDA
Chairman Brittle requested that Item 8 be deleted from
the Consent Agenda as it is a potential conflict of interest.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the Consent Agenda
with the deletion of Item 8. The motion was seconded by
Supervisor Nickens.
RESOLUTION 7-22-86-164 APPROVING
AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET
FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS
ITEM K - CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain section of the agenda of the
Board of Supervisors for July 22, 1986, designated as Item K -
Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to
each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1
through 8, inclusive, as follows:
1. Minutes of Meeting - June 17, 1986, June 24, 1986,
July 8, 1986.
2. Amendment to Resolution adopted on June 24, 1986,
for the $16 million general obligation bond
referendum.
3. Approval of revised Bingo/Raffle permit procedures.
,... .
26
July 22, 1986
_'0'__ . .._
~~ --. ,.. .'- ~-~"-'--
- ., ---.---.,"--.--- ---,' -.,--.-" -~, -- -_.__. - ~'.
4. Acceptance of Deed conveying sewer lines of Lots
7-A and 7-B, Block 2, Oak View Court.
5. Confirmation of appointments to the Community
Corrections Board.
6. Acceptance of Deed conveying sewer lines of Triton
Incorporated.
7. Acceptance of Deed conveying water and sewer lines
of The Falls, Section 1.
s~ Aeeep~~ftee e£ Seed eeftYeY~ftg ~fie w~~er ~ftd sewer
%~ftes ~ft 6reeft V~%%ey, See~~eft ~~
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Nickens
and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Garrett, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw, and Brittle
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 7-22-86-164.A AMENDING
RESOLUTION 6-24-86-140 REQUESTING THE
CIRCUIT COURT OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, TO ORDER AN ELECTION ON THE
QUESTION OF ISSUING UP TO $16,000,000
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS OF THE COUNTY
AND SETTING FORTH THE AMOUNT AND
PURPOSES THEREOF
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia (the "Board") has determined that it has become neces-
sary and would be in the public interest to contract a debt on
behalf of Roanoke County, Virginia (the "County") and issue the
County's general obligation bonds in the maximum amount and for
the purposes hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to authority granted by the Public
Finance Act, Chapter 5, Title 15.1 of the Code of Virginia
(1950), as amended, (the "Act"), the Board proposes to call a
special election to take the sense of the qualified voters of th~
County on the question of contracting a debt and issuing the
general obligation bonds of the County; and
27
July 22, 1986
WHEREAS, the Board intends to amend its resolution
adopted on June 24, 1986, to more clearly describe and explain
the purpose and question of the proposed referendum.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Super-
visors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows:
1. That the Board hereby finds it advisable to con-
tract a debt and issue general obligation bonds of the County in
an amount not to exceed $16,000,000 (the "Bonds") for the purpose
of paying all or a portion of the costs of acquiring,
constructing, developing, and equipping a public water supply and
related facilities, including a dam and reservoir.
2. That the Board hereby requests the Circuit Court of
Roanoke County, Virginia to order an election on November 4, 1986
on the question of contracting a debt and issuing the Bonds for
the purposes herein set forth, provided that such date is at
least sixty (60) days after the date on which the Court enters
its order. The question on the ballot shall be in substantially
the following form or such other form as may be approved by the
Electoral Board of the County.
QUESTION: Shall Roanoke County, Virginia contract a
debt and issue its general obligation bonds in an
amount not to exceed Sixteen Million Dollars
($16,000,000) pursuant to the Public Finance Act,
Chapter 5, Title 15.1 of the Code of Virginia (1950)
as amended, for the purpose of paying all or a por-
tion of the costs of acquiring, constructing,
developing, and equipping a public water supply and
related facilities including a dam and reservoir.
c=J Yes
c=J ~
3. The Clerk of the Board is instructed to immediately
file a certified copy of this resolution with the Circuit Court
of Roanoke County, Virginia.
~8
July 22, 1986
---'''-~--~---'---'---'-_.'"~-'--_.-
,__~ m_···'__·<~. _,._.___________..._.............___,..__._.,_.___
4. This resolution shall take effect immediately.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Nickens
and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Garrett, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw, and Brittl
NAYS: None
Item 8 - Acceptance of Deed Conveying the Water and
Sewer Line in Green Valley, Section 7 - Supervisor Johnson moved
to approve the acceptance of the deed conveying water and sewer
lines in Green Valley, Section 7. The motion was seconded by
Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Garrett, Johnson, Nickens, and McGraw
NAYS: None
ABSTAINED: Supervisor Brittle
IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION
Supervisor Brittle moved to go into Executive Session
pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a) (2). The motion wa
seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by a unanimous voice
vote.
IN RE:
OPEN SESSION
Supervisor Brittle moved to return to Open Session.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by a
unanimous voice vote.
IN RE:
RECESS
Chairman Brittle declared a dinner recess at 5:10 p.m.
IN RE:
CALL TO ORDER
29
July 22, 1986
Chairman Brittle called the meeting to order at 7:00
p.m. He announced that anyone wishing to speak before the Board
must fill out the yellow "Appearance Request Form" located on the
table at the entrance to the Community Room. Chairman
Brittle also announced that public hearing number 10 concerning
water service connection fees would not be heard this evening.
It has been deferred for two weeks.
IN RE:
CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
Ms. Ruth Lipnik of Volunteers Teaching Illiterates to
Read was present to discuss the purpose of this group. She
reported on the percentages of illiterates throughout the Valley
and the nation. She also reported on the process of training
individuals to teach illiterates to read.
IN RE:
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Public Hearing to Accept Comments on the 419
Corridor Study - Mr. Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning, Zoning,
and Grants reported that a community meeting was held on July 9,
1986, to discuss this proposed plan with the citizens of that
area. Approximately 120 citizens appeared. On July 15, a public
hearing was held by the Planning Commission, at which time a
Future Land Use Guide and a policy statement pertaining to the
419 Corridor Study was adopted. Staff recommends that the only
portion of the Corridor Study that be adopted this evening is the
Future Land Use Guide Map. It will take approximately four to
six months to complete the policy statement, at which time, the
Planning Commission comments will be modified and incorporated
within the total Corridor Study. Mr. Stalzer reported that the
Planning Commission did make a minor modification to the Land Use
Map changing the parcel designation adjoining Allred Chevrolet,
80
July 22, 1986
adjacent to the Latter Day Saints Church west of Salem, from
Neighborhood Conservation to Transition. Supervisor Johnson
inquired about the slope and water run-off on this property. Mr
Stalzer reported that he could not determine any definite effect
of filling the property without an engineering study, but that h
feels that it would make the drainage problem in that area worse
Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the Future Land Us
Guide Map for the 419 Corridor Study and that the policy
statement not be adopted at this time.
Chairman Brittle reported that there were two citizens
present who would like to speak on this matter.
Supervisor Garrett withdrew his motion.
Mr. Gerry Bijwaard, 4802 Brookwood Drive, SW, Roanoke,
Virginia, 24018, expressed three major concerns about the
development of 419: the traffic situation; the drainage; and th
decline of the visual environment. He also expressed a concern
that the Land Use Guide Map and the 419 Corridor Study have been
separated into two public hearings. He felt that these two
public hearings should be adopted as one.
Ms. Mabel Smith, 4502 Wyndale Avenue, SW, Roanoke,
Virginia, requested that the Board establish a citizens committe
to research and investigate the possibility of a bypass from
Interstate 81 to Route 220 and that a moratorium be placed on 41
until the completion of this study. Mrs. Smith felt that
expanding 419 into six lanes would only create more problems
instead of solving them.
Mr. Howard G. Worthy, Jr., 5535 McVitty Road, SW,
Roanoke, Virginia, 24018, requested that the Board assess the
raw land on 419 at a more realistic market. If the assessment 0
this property is changed, he felt that the 75/25 ratio could be
met without more rezonings on 419. He also felt that the
residential property owners are subsidizing taxes for developers
Mr. Worthy inquired about the firmness of the Land Use Plan, the
31
July 22, 1986
procedures to deviate from or change the plan, and the pace of
development as far as alleviating traffic problem as development
occurs.
Supervisor Brittle inquired about the fiscal impact
concerning additional personnel. Mr. Stalzer reported that the
money for additional personnel is not in his budget for this
fiscal year since this project was not originally scheduled for
the current year and that it could be delayed until the spring.
He does have funds in the temporary personnel account and this
should be considered as a matter of priorities. Chairman Brittle
directed Mr. Stalzer to work with Mr. Hodge regarding the
temporary personnel and to bring the personnel matter back to the
Board at a later date.
Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the Future Land Use
Guide Map of the 419 Corridor Study but to exclude the policy
statement. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle.
Supervisor Nickens expressed a concern about the
current zoning of properties on 419 as residential. Supervisor
Johnson expressed the same concerns.
Supervisor Nickens offered a substitute motion to
~pprove the Land Use Guide Map as recommended by the Planning
Commission. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson.
FINAL ORDER
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
WHEREAS, your petitioner, the Roanoke County Planning
~ommission did petition the Board of County Supervisors to have
the following amendment be made to the Roanoke County Land Use
Plan:
(1) The 419 Corridor Study.
WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning
þommission did hold a public hearing on the petition on July 11,
I
3~
July 22, 1986
___'__·_·~'·_'.__"~_···_r___~·_'__
----,-"..,-.-.- ""-'~--_.'--------,---~--
1986, at which time, all parties in interest were given an
opportunity to be heard; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
amendments be made.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary to the Planning Commission and that
he be directed to reflect these changes in the Roanoke County
Land Use Plan.
Adopted on motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the
plan that has been adopted by the Planning Commission. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Garrett, Johnson, Nickens, and Brittle
NAYS: None
ABSTAINED: Supervisor McGraw
Supervisor McGraw abstained due to ownership of 419
property.
2. Public Hearing to Accept Comments on the Land Use
Management Guide - Mr. Jim Lehe, Planning, reported that this
plan was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission.
This guide completes the Roanoke County land use plan by adding
an implementation strategy and procedures for amending and
monitoring the plan. If this plan is approved by the Board, the
Land Use Management Advisory Council will begin drafting new
zoning regulations with a completion target date of December
1987.
Mr. Howard Worthy and Mr. Gerry Bijwaard requested tha
the Board consider their comments under Public Hearing 1 when
making a decision on approving the Land Use Management Guide.
Mr. Paul Bell, 2705 Hillbrook Drive, SW, Roanoke,
Virginia, 24018, reported that he felt that all the development
on Route 419 is unnecessary. He also suggested that if a higher
tax base is needed, that the Board raise the tax base but not
33
July 22, 1986
disturb the land. He also felt that six laning Route 419 will
only increase problems and that the Board should consider the
bypass.
Chairman Brittle inquired about the bypass in question.
Mr. Hubbard reported that plans have not been dropped and are
still included in County plans as a top priority. These projects
are determined in priority by the State Highway Department.
Supervisor Brittle moved to approve the staff's
recommendation to approve the Land Use Management Guide. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens.
FINAL ORDER
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
WHEREAS, your petitioner, the Roanoke County Planning
Commission did petition the Board of County Supervisors to have
the following amendment be made to the Roanoke County Land Use
Plan:
(1) The Land Use Management Guide.
WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning
Commission did hold a public hearing on the petition on July 11,
1986, at which time, all parties in interest were given an
opportunity to be heard; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
amendments be made.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
he be directed to reflect these changes in the Roanoke County
Land Use Plan.
ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Brittle, seconded by
Supervisor Nickens and upon the following recorded vote:
~YES: Supervisors Garrett, Johnson, Nickens, and Brittle
~AYS: None
~BSTAINED: Supervisor McGraw
;:14
July 22, 1986
--,,---~_._..,---.-_..,._.._._-~_..,..._--~---
_... .-.'"~. --..--.-
Supervisor McGraw abstained due to ownership of
property on Route 419.
3. Petition of Strauss Construction Company,
Requesting Vacation of a Portion of a Drainage Easement in the
Catawba Magisterial District - (HELD OVER FROM JUNE 24, 1986) -
APPROVED - Mr. Toby Cruiser, Project Manager of Strauss
Construction, was present to answer any questions the Board migh
have. There was no one present in opposition.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the vacation
request. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw.
FINAL ORDER
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
WHEREAS, your petitioner, Strauss Construction Co.,
Inc., did petition the Board of County Supervisors to abandon an
vacate the entire drainage easement(s) located on Lot 1, Block 1
Revised Section #1, The Falls; and
WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Board of County
Supervisors did hold a public hearing on said request on July 22
1986, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738
Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, at which time all parties
in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, after full consideration the Board of Roanoke
County Supervisors is of the opinion that the request should be
granted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED, that the entire drainag~
easement(s), hereinabove described as vacation of drainage
easement on a plat attached hereto, be permanently vacated and
abandoned.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Department of Development and that this order
be recorded by Petitioner along with the attached plat among the
land records of Roanoke County.
35
July 22, 1986
Adopted on motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by
Supervisor McGraw, and upon the following roll call vote:
AYES: Supervisors Garrett, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw, and Brittle
NAYS: None
Chairman Brittle directed Mr. Gubala to transmit to the
developers that when they have matters to be heard by the Board
that they themselves appear to present their request.
4. Petition of Caveness, Inc., Requesting Rezoning
from A-I, Agricultural to M-l, Industrial in the Windsor Hills
Magisterial District - <HELD OVER FROM JUNE 24, 1986) - APPROVED
- Ms. Lorine S. Caveness was present representing Caveness, Inc.
She reported that she is requesting rezoning from A-I to M-l to
allow for light manufacturing of handcrafted furniture.
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney, reported that this
matter came before the Board approximately two months ago as a
potential lease of County property. This is the old Bent
Mountain Fire Station. A lease agreement has been negotiated
with Caveness, Inc., which will be executed subject to approval
of this rezoning request by the Board of Supervisors.
There was no one present in opposition.
Supervisor Garrett moved to grant the rezoning request.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson.
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps
as Parcel 111.00-1-17 and recorded in Deed Book 632, page 246,
and legally described below, be rezoned from A-I, Agricultural
District, to M-l, Industrial District.
BEGINNING at an iron pipe on the west
right-of-way line of Route 221, corner to
the property now or formerly owned by
Mary Powell Baker; thence, with the west
right-of-way line of Route 221 S. 15° 30'
W. 70 feet to an iron pin; thence N. 74°
30' W. 100 feet to an iron pin; thence N.
22° 32' W. 78.3 feet to a point; thence,
N. 57° 00' E. 104.5 feet to a point;
thence, S. 74° 30' E. 79.3 feet to a
;j6
July 22, 1986
-'--"'--',... ^-_...,,~~ .~_.._--~~.-._---_._._..,,-
point on the west boundary of Route 221;
thence, with the same, S. 15° 30' W. 70
feet to the point of beginning and
containing 0.443 acres.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
he be directed to reflect that change on the Official Zoning Map
of Roanoke County.
ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by
Supervisor Johnson, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Garrett, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw, and Brittl
NAYS: None
PROFFER OF CONDITIONS
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
Being in accord with Section 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the
Code of Virginia and Section 2l-l05E of the Roanoke County Zonin
Ordinance, the Petitioner, Caveness, Inc., hereby voluntarily
proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia
the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced
parcel of land:
1. The use of the property will be limited to the
manufacture or assembling of products from the following
materials: cellophane, canvas, cloth, cork, fiberglass, leather
paper, plastic, straw, textiles, wood, and yarn.
2. All work will be conducted inside the structure.
5. Petition of H. Ladd Corporation for a Special
Exception Permit and to Rezone an 11.7 Acre Tract to develop a
Class B. Mobile Home Park, Located in the Catawba Magisterial
District - (CONTINUED FROM JUNE 24, 1986) - APPROVED - Chairman
Brittle requested that Mr. Stalzer address the circumstances
regarding the bridge which was the reason this public hearing wa
held over. Mr. Stalzer reported that he spoke with the Roanoke
County Fire Department #9, the State Police, and the Virginia
Department of Highways and Transportation. The posted weight
limit for the bridge is 10 tons, the length is 6 feet. The
Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation pointed out
37
July 22, 1986
that a structure of this size is debatable as to whether it is
even a bridge or not. It may be classified as a culvert or a
bridge. The petitioner's property is within the service area of
Fire Station Number 9. The primary water supply in a major fire
would be a tandem tanker fire truck that weighs 29 tons. This
truck weighs 5.28 tons on the front axle, the midship axle is
9.91 tons, and the rear axle is 13.1 tons. The truck because of
the length of the bridge would pass over the structure one axle
at a time. At no time would the entire truck be supported by the
bridge. The fire department, the state police, and the Highway
Department believe that this bridge could sustain the weight as
long as it was not on a continual basis. VDH&T says all bridges
have a certain amount of elasticity. The fire truck mentioned
earlier has been over the bridge a number of times already.
Mr. Ray Robrecht, representing the opposition, was
present at the Board of Supervisors meeting. He reported that
the increased volume of traffic will put a substantial strain and
burden on those roads. He requested that the Board deny the
rezoning petition because of the conditions of the road at this
time.
Mr. Jarrett, representing the petitioner, reported that
he has consulted with several of the firms that would be
transporting the mobile homes to the location and they have
expressed that the road is adequate to transport mobile homes of
today's standards without any major hazards being confronted by
them.
Supervisor Johnson requested that this road should be
placed on the Six-Year Plan next year.
Mr. Hodge pointed out for the record that this road is
not on the Six-Year plan and isn't sure when it will be put on
because there are a number of roads that are in worse condition.
Supervisor Johnson reported that he would support the
addition of this road to the Six Year Plan next year.
t,
8~
July 22, 1986
~--._._-",., .~_._~-,~_.-
Supervisor Brittle moved to grant the petition. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens.
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Map
as Parcel 54.02-4-30 and recorded in Deed Book 1217, Page 530,
and legally described below, be rezoned from RE, Residential
Estates District, to RE-MH, Residential Estates Mobile Home
District.
BEGINNING at a point on the west side of
State Secondary Route 680 at "A" on map
recorded in Deed Book 407, at page 406,
in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
Court of Roanoke County, Virginia; thence
with the line of M. C. Hill S. 73° 07' W.
448.8 feet to a post at "B"; thence with
a new line N. 13° 18' 30" W. 676.57 feet
to an iron; thence N. 18° 00' E. 505
feet, more or less, to a post; thence N.
72° 30' W. 683 feet to a post at "M";
thence S. 4° 54' E. 596 feet along a
fence line to a post at "N"; thence N.
85° IS' E. 86 feet crossing State Route
680 at a point in the center of branch at
"0"; thence with the branch as it
meanders S. 20° 15' W. 175 feet to "P"
thence S. 12° 23' E. 48 feet to the place
of BEGINNING, containing 11.7 acres, more
or less, as shown in detail on map made
by T. P. Parker, dated October 20, 1948
and found with the deed recorded in Deed
Book 407, page 403; and
BEING the same property conveyed unto the
H. Lad Corporation by deed dated February
13, 1985, from Frank B. Phlegar and
Frances L. Phlegar, husband and wife, of
record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office,
by corrected description.
THERE IS ALSO HEREBY CONVEYED for the
foregoing consideration all easements and
rights of way of record for the benefit
of the hereinabove described property.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
he be directed to reflect that change on the Official Zoning Map
of Roanoke County.
Adopted on motion of Supervisor Brittle, seconded by
Supervisor Nickens and upon the following recorded vote:
39
July 22, 1986
AYES: Supervisors Garrett, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw, and Brittle
NAYS: None
6. Petition of AMBRA Development Company Requesting a
Rezoning from R-3 to B-3 to Construct and Operate a Petroleum
Outlet, Mini-Convenience Store and Enclosed Automobile Wash -
DENIED - Mr. Gerald Dechow, representing AMBRA Development
Company, reported that this facility would be located at the
intersection of Chaparral and Route 419. It will be contained by
a variety of plantings and is mostly out of sight of the homes in
the neighborhood behind it. There will be indirect and low level
lighting. He does not feel that this facility will create
additional traffic on Route 419 as it is not a destination but a
place of service to the traffic already there.
Mr. Gilbert Paul, 2906 Glenmont Drive, SW, Roanoke,
Virginia, was present in opposition representing the citizens who
reside behind that property. He reported to the Board that tree
buffers will not help if AMBRA Development installs lights around
the property.
Mr. W. H. Fralin, P. O. Box 2865, Roanoke, Virginia, of
Fralin & Waldron, Inc., was also present in opposition. He was
opposed to the construction of this facility because he feels it
is not a compatible land use.
Supervisor Johnson moved to deny the petition. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett.
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps
as Parcel 87.06-4-4 and recorded in Deed Book 937, page 494, and
legally described below, be rezoned from R-3, Residential
District, to B-3, Business District.
STARTING at a point on the southerly side
of new Virginia Route 419, said point
being on the easterly line of Lot 15,
Block 1, according to the Map of Section
No.1, Glenmont, of record in Plat Book
6, Page 42, in the Clerk's Office of the
Þ 40
July 22, 1986
circuit Court for the County of Roanoke,
Virginia, thence with the southerly line
of Virginia Route 419, S. 70° 35' 20" E.
85 feet, more or less, to the ACTUAL
PLACE OF BEGINNING, thence continuing
with the southerly side of Virginia Route
419, S. 70° 35' 20" E. 160 feet, more or
less, to a point; thence S. 28° 44' 55"
E. 53.10 feet to a point on the westerly
side of new Virginia Route 800; thence
with the line of Virginia Route 800, S.
19° 19' W. 370 feet, more or less, to a
point; thence leaving said road, and with
the line of Beck Wilson, N. 15° 24' 15"
W. 40 feet, more or less, to a point;
thence N. 5° 23' E. 130.4 feet to a
point; thence N. 68° 23' 30" W. 278.0
feet to a point; thence leaving the line
of Beck Wilson and with the line of Lot
24, Block 1, according to the Map of
Section No.1, Glenmont, N. 37° 44' 46"
E. 76 feet, more or less, to a point;
thence leaving the line of Lot 24, Block
1, S. 70° 35' 20" E. 133 feet, more or
less, to a point; thence N. 19° 19' E.
175.0 feet to the ACTUAL PLACE OF
BEGINNING, and containing 1.48 acres,
more or less.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
he be directed to reflect that change on the Official Zoning Map
of Roanoke County.
DENIED on motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by
Supervisor Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Garrett, Johnson, Nickens, and Brittle
NAYS: Supervisor McGraw
7. Petition of Donald W. Bandy and R. Fletcher
EDDerson Reauestinq Rezoninq from A-I to RE-MH a 153 Acre Parcel
to Develop a Mobile Home Subdivision Located in the Cave Spring
Magisterial District - APPROVED - Mr. Ed Natt was present on
behalf of the petitioner to answer any questions the Board might
have. He reported that this parcel will be divided into
approximately 198 lots. The streets within the subdivision will
be publicly maintained and dedicated to the state.
He also
reported that it will take from three to five years to complete
the project which would be in line with the road improvements on
Yellow Mountain Road.
'¡,'<
41
July 22, 1986
Mr. Roscoe Martin, a resident of Bandy Road, adjacent
to the property discussed in this rezoning, was present in
opposition to this project because of the conditions of Yellow
Mountain Road. He requested that the Board delay approval of
this subdivision until the road conditions of Yellow Mountain
Road have been improved.
Chairman Brittle asked Mr. Mahoney how this property
would be taxed. Mr. Mahoney responded that this property will be
taxed as real estate if Class A mobile homes are placed on the
lots and personal property if Class B mobile homes are placed on
I~he lots because of the standards and tests established by the
~ttorney General's Office.
Supervisor Nickens inquired about the marginal source
þf public water. Mr. Natt reported that the water in that area
is supplied from the City of Roanoke. Mr. Stalzer reported that
the Engineering department stated that the supply is marginal but
did not say it was a specific problem. Mr. Natt also responded
that Mr. Bandy will drill his own wells if Roanoke City will not
~xtend its water lines to that area.
Mr. Natt reported that the site plan is proffered.
Supervisor Nickens inquired about the percentage of
µnits that will be different classes. He responded that all
µnits will be Class A.
Supervisor Nickens moved that the petition be granted
ind that he hopes that the concerns of Yellow Mountain Road
~ondition be addressed at the appropriate time. The motion was
3econded by Supervisor Brittle.
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
~arcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps
as Parcel #89.03-4-23 and #98.02-1-2 and legally described below,
be rezoned from A-I Agricultural District to RE-MH, Residential
Estates Manufactured Housing District.
42
July 22, 1986
-----"----~----._--_..
-~.__._-~- -.-.
153 acres, more or less, situate on the
westerly side of Yellow Mountain Road
approximately 2 miles from the Roanoke
City limits.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
he be directed to reflect that change on the Official Zoning Map
of Roanoke County.
ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by
Supervisor Brittle and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Garrett, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw, and BrittlE
NAYS: None
8. Petition of Bruce Hobart Requesting Rezoning from
R-l to B-1 a 7.6 Acre Parcel for Construction of an Office Park
Located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District - APPROVED -
Mr. Ed Natt was present representing Mr. Bruce Hobart. Mr.
Hobart is requesting rezoning from R-l, Residential, to B-1,
Business, of a 7.6 acre parcel to construct an office park. The
site will contain three buildings (two one story buildings and
one two story buildings) with a total of approximately 61,000
square feet. The site plan is submitted and proffered as a
condition of the rezoning. Mr. Natt reported that there will be
a deceleration lane on 419 coming from each direction on the
entrance, which has been tentatively approved by the Highway
Department.
Mr. John Shumate, Jr., 4358 Sheldon Drive, SW, Roanoke
Virginia, 24018, was present in opposition to the rezoning
request. He was concerned about the flooding problems in that
area. He did report that his concerns were somewhat alleviated
by Mr. Natt when he reported that the developer would install a
ten year storm drain. Mr. Shumate requested that the County
change their ordinance to require future developers to provide
retention facilities that will control the run off of a ten year
storm.
r', 43
July 22, 1986
Mr. Roger Lorden, 4390 Sheldon Drive, Roanoke,
Virginia, was present representing the residents of the Cresthill
subdivision in their opposition to this rezoning. He reported
that two-thirds of the property in question is on McVitty Road
and that he feels that McVitty Road should remain residential as
it is a natural buffer from the commercial area of 419 and the
residential area of 419. If this rezoning is approved, the
residents of Cresthill request that the builders proffer that
there be no ingress or egress on McVitty Road.
Supervisor Garrett inquired about what staff can do to
allay the fears of placing an ingress and egress on McVitty Road.
John Peters, Road Coordinator, recommended that a combined access
be incorporated at this site. The only way the County would have
control over the ingress/egress situation would be if the builder
proffered it as a condition.
Mr. Lewis C. Jamison, 2827 McVitty Road, SW, Roanoke,
Virginia, commended Roanoke County on the development of the 419
plan and requested that the beauty and the asthetics of the road
and consideration of the people who live adjacent to the road be
considered when making their final decisions on rezonings.
Mrs. Mabel Smith, 4502 Wyndale Avenue, SW, Roanoke,
Virginia, requested that the Board take action to alleviate the
traffic problem on Route 419.
Supervisor Nickens inquired about the exterior of the
building. Mr. Natt responded that his client would use an
exterior that would blend in with the surroundings.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the rezoning
request with proffered conditions. The motion was seconded by
Supervisor Brittle.
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps
as Parcel 76.16-1-35, Parcel 76.16-1-36, and Parcel 76.16.1-37
44
July 22, 1986
.. ..-.~ ~-,---,_.."-,,~
- --...._..'.. .,.... --~---,-~- . -- -~--_. ---~._-
and legally described below, be rezoned from R-l, Residential
District, to B-1, Office and Institutional District, with the
proffered conditions being attached thereto; said property to be
rezoned being identified as Parcel 76.1-16-1-35, Parcel
76.16.1-36 and Parcel 76.16-1-37 on the Roanoke County tax
records.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
he be directed to reflect that change on the Official Zoning Map
of Roanoke County.
ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by
Supervisor Brittle and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Garrett, Johnson, Nickens, and Brittle
NAYS: None
ABSTAINED: Supervisor McGraw
Supervisor McGraw abstained for reasons of appearance
of conflict.
PROFFER OF CONDITIONS
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
Being in accord with Section 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the
Code of Virginia and Section 21-105E of the Roanoke County Zonin
Ordinance, the Petitioner, Bruce Hobart, hereby voluntarily
proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia
the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced
parcel of land.
1) That the property will be developed in accordance
with the site plan prepared by Ernie Rose, Inc. - Architects,
Richmond, Virginia, submitted herewith and made a part hereof.
2) That all lighting in parking areas will be directea
away from adjacent residential areas.
3) That the citizens will have an opportunity to
determine, if they so desire, the method of screening and
buffering from properties in adjacent residential area.
45
July 22, 1986
4) That Petitioner will review the drainage situation
involving said property and, if feasible, agrees to implement
drainage facilities to retain or detain more than the two-year
storm required by Roanoke County and consider retention or
detention for a tenth year storm.
5) If the property is developed in phases, the
Petitioner will not denude the remaining undeveloped land until
development in that area commences.
6) The architecture shall be of brick and glass
construction similar to the photographs submitted with the
petition.
7) Petitioner agrees to work with the County staff
regarding the development of the project to insure that adequate
traffic patterns and traffic flow are utilized.
8) That all signage will be asthetically pleasing and
of a reasonable size.
9. Petition of the Roanoke Moose Lodge #284 Requesting
a Use Not Provided For Permit to Operate a Camping Area for
Members in the Catawba Magisterial District - Mr. Bruce Hensley,
a member of the Board of Officers of the Roanoke Moose Lodge 284,
was present to answer any questions the Board might have. He
reported that the Board granted a permit for the same purpose in
1985. This time, the Lodge has decided to place the camping area
behind the Lodge. There was no one present in opposition.
Supervisor Nickens moved that the petition be approved.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson.
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps
-'-
as Parcel 16.03-1-46 and recorded in Deed Book 922, Page 306, and
legally described below, be granted a Use Not Provided for Permit.
BEGINNING at an iron pin on the easterly
right-of-way line of Virginia State Route
311; said pin being S. 31° 42'E. 601.17
feet from a concrete highway monument on
46
July 22, 1986
'N'.·~_·,_,.·. ',__."__'"''
..----. _.~-~.-
the easterly right-of-way line of the
said Virginia State Route 311 which is
opposite Virginia State Highway Survey
Station 294 + 07.61 as shown on Virginia
State Highway Right-of-Way Plat recorded
in Highway Plat Book I in the office of
the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
County; thence leaving Virginia State
Highway #311, and with four (4) new lines
through the acreage conveyed to Burruss
Land & Lumber Company, Inc., by deed
dated July 9, 1971, of record in Deed
Book 922 at Page 306 in the office of the
Clerk aforesaid, the following courses
and distances: S. 86° 33' E. 1,200.00
feet to an iron; thence S. 76° 03' E.
530.5 feet to an iron; thence S. 4° 45'
E. 566.9 feet to an iron; thence S. 85°
15' W. 1,280.3 feet to an iron on the
easterly right-of-way line of Virginia
State Route #311; thence with the
easterly right-of-way line of Virginia
State Route #311 a curve to the left
whose radius is 994.93 for an arc
distance of 304.03 feet to a point;
thence still with the easterly
right-of-way line of Virginia State Route
#311 N. 31° 42' W. 695.97 feet to the
place of BEGINNING, containing 25 acres,
more or less, and shown on the plat of
survey hereunto appended and, by
reference made a part hereof; said plat
having been prepared by R. L. Adams under
date of October 16, 1974; and
BEING a portion of the said property
conveyed to Burruss Land and Lumber
Company, Inc., by deed dated July 9,
1971, from Charles Douglas Branch et
also of record in Deed Book 922 at Page
306 in the office of the Clerk of the
Circuit Court of Roanoke County.
THE use not provided for permit pertains
specifically to that portion of the
Property approximately 100' by 200' lying
in the North East Corner of the property,
approximately 50' from the north property
line as indicated on the attached
Dimensional Site Plan.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
he be directed to reflect that change on the Official Zoning Map
of Roanoke County.
ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by
Supervisor Johnson and upon the following roll call vote:
AYES: Supervisors Garrett, Johnson, Nickens, and Brittle
NAYS: None
47
July 22, 1986
ABSTAINED: Supervisor McGraw
Supervisor McGraw abstained due to membership in the
Moose Lodge.
---
PROFFER OF CONDITIONS
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
Being in accord with Section 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the
Code of Virginia and Section 2l-105E of the Roanoke County Zoning
Ordinance, the Petitioner, Roanoke Moose Lodge 284, hereby
voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, the following conditions to the rezoning of the
above referenced parcel of land:
1. Existing sewage treatment facility to be inspected
by Roanoke County Department of Health for current adequacy and
future adequacy. Favorable evaluation by the Health Department
required prior to construction of camping facility.
2. Portion of property located at front of property
will not be used for camping purposes (Use Not Provided For
Permit obtained from the Board of Supervisors on May 28,1985).
10. Public Hearing to Amend the Ordinance Establishing
New Connection Fees for Water Service - Deferred for two weeks.
11. Public Hearing for the Disposition of Lots 75, 76,
Dropmore Subdivision, City of Salem - Paul Mahoney recommended
that the Board concur with staff's recommendation to execute such
documents and take such actions as may be necessary to convey
Lots 75 and 76 of the Dropmore Subdivision in the City of Salem.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve staff's
recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens
and carried by the following recorded vote:
~YES: Supervisors Garrett, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw, and Brittle
NAYS: None
IN RE: REPORTS
48
July 22, 1986
,._---~-,---,.~.._---_._,._~-~--_._-"-_....,..-,--
"'~.'-'-"-'~'-"~
"~~"'~~----"
The following reports were received by the Board of
Supervisors:
1. Accounts Paid for the Month of June 1986.
2. Youth Haven II Project Status Report.
3. Development Data Report for 2nd Quarter-1986.
IN RE:
ADJOURNMENT
Chairman Brittle adjourned the meeting at 10:00 p.m.
,...._,\
þ--
\~. ~~\\.
Chairman
\
\
\
'\\.
\\
\