10/28/1986 - Regular
, l~) \1
-..--..,.--.- . -.--. ---."--. ...-...-.."".. ...-....
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Cente
3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24015
October 28, 1986
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County
Administration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday, and the
second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of October, 1986
IN RE:
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Brittle called the meeting to order at 3:03
p.m. The roll call was taken.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chairman Alan H. Brittle; Vice-Chairman Bol
Johnson; Supervisors Harry C. Nickens,
Steven A. McGraw, and Lee Garrett
MEMBERS ABSENT:
None
STAFF PRESENT:
Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul
M. Mahoney, County Attorney; John M.
Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator
of Management Services; Timothy W. Gubala,
Assistant County Administrator of Communit
Development; Reta R. Busher, Director of
Budget; Darrell Shell, Director of Parks
and Recreation; Phil Henry, Director of
Engineering; Skip Ninninger, Chief Buildinc
Official; D. Keith Cook, Director of
Personnel; Kathy Claytor, Personnel
Analyst; and Tommy Fuqua, Fire and Rescue
Chief; Alfred C. Anderson, Roanoke County
Treasurer; Wayne Compton, Roanoke County
Commissioner of Revenue; Linda Lovingood,
Acting Public Information Officer; Bobbie
L. Hall, Deputy Clerk; and Mary H. Allen,
County Administrator's staff
IN RE:
OPENING CEREMONIES
The invocation was given by John M. Chambliss,
Assistant County Administrator of Management Services. The
Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present.
157A
October 28, 1986
IN RE:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS
Mr. Hodge announced that Mr. Gubala has been appointed
Treasurer of the Virginia Economic Development Association. He
also introduced Mr. Phil Henry, the new Director of Engineering.
~r. Hodge announced that the position of Public Information
Dfficer has been filled and requested Mr. Cook to report to the
~oard on the applicant. Mr. Cook reported that the position of
~ublic Information has been filled by Ms. Janet Johnstone from
Hauck & Hairston. He also distributed a media release regarding
~s. Johnstone's background. A copy of this media release has
~een included in the packet of the Deputy Clerk.
IN RE:
PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS
Chairman Brittle presented a resolution of appreciation
to Lawrens Design for their donation of services to Youth Haven
II. Ms. Terri Hancock was present to accept the resolution.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the prepared resolution. The
notion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw.
RESOLUTION 10-28-86-214 EXPRESSING THE
APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS TO LAWRENS DESIGN FOR THEIR
DONATION OF SERVICES TO YOUTH HAVEN II
WHEREAS, in May of 1985, the Board of Supervisors
recognized the need for and approved the development of a home
for troubled girls in Roanoke County; and
WHEREAS, the building where the Youth Haven II home
~ill be located has required substantial renovation and
improvement; and
WHEREAS, Lawrens Design has generously donated their
interior decorating services and in doing so, have greatly
improved the appearance of the building; and
(' c
158
October 28, 1986
_______..__._.,'"'H _,_~,_..~".~.,""_.~.
,__,~,____,_~ _~"~",·__.".d.____.
...--...-...,...--..... ,.
~__ W ..~
WHEREAS, this act of generosity and support is one tha
expresses in a meaningful way the concern of this organization
for the troubled youth of Roanoke Valley and further demonstrate~
an admirable sense of civic responsibility.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisor~
wishes to express its gratitude and the gratitude of all Roanoke
County citizens for the services provided by Lawrens Design for
the youth of our community, the Youth Haven II program, and
Roanoke County.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor McGraw,
and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens, McGraw, Garrett, and BrittlE
NAYS: None
Paul Mahoney reported to the Board that he has receive¿
correspondence from the Supreme Court denying the appeal of John
C. Anderson, et al., v. Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County.
Chairman Brittle also presented a resolution of
appreciation to Mr. "Gene" Thomas Wagner upon his retirement froI1
the County. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the prepared
resolution. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett.
RESOLUTION 10-28-86-215 EXPRESSING THE
APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO CHIEF
T. E. "GENE" WAGNER FOR 28 YEARS OF
SERVICE TO ROANOKE COUNTY
WHEREAS, Chief T. E. Wagner was first employed in
February of 1958 as Fire Chief at the Mount Pleasant Fire
Department; and
WHEREAS, Chief Wagner has also served as Chairman of
the Roanoke County Fire Chiefs Board, and has been an active
member of the State Fire Chiefs Association of Virginia.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation
and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to Chief
159
October 28, 1986
agner for 28 years of capable, loyal, and dedicated service to
County.
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best
ishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement.
n motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Garrett,
nd upon the following recorded vote:
Supervisors Johnson, Nickens, McGraw, Garrett, and Brittle
None
Mr. Hodge announced that Mr. Wagner has been elected
olunteer Chief.
IN RE:
NEW BUSINESS
1. Authorization to Execute Extra-Territorial Arrest
reement with the Town of vinton - Mr. Mahoney reported to the
oard that he has been working with Mr. Selby, vinton Town
ttorney, on the alteration of certain definitions of language in
he agreement. He requested that the Board postpone this matter
the November 11, 1986, Board of Supervisors meeting.
Supervisor Johnson moved to table this matter. The
carried by a unanimous voice vote.
2. Status Report on Referenda Issues:
a. Water - Mr. Hodge reported to the Board that
he County has a video tape of the commercial which will be aired
o promote the water issue. Linda Lovingood presented the tape
o the Board, the media, and the citizens present. Ms. Lovingood
eported that the commercial began running on October 27, 1986,
nd will run 61 times until November 3, 1986.
Chairman Brittle expressed the appreciation of the
oard to Jack Smith and the Chamber of Commerce for financing the
roduction of the commercial.
Mr. Hodge also reported that he has received a letter
rom the State Water Control Board verifying the 401 Water
October 28, 1986
, 1 ij 0
_.__"___...__~." _"·."._··u_._,,~_·'_
.._----..,._._-"---_..-_.~"-~_._-
..".-.--,...---.-........'.
Certification that Roanoke County received in 1985 which allows
for the withdrawal of water from the Roanoke River.
b. Police Department - Mr. Hodge announced that
the brochures concerning the police department have been
released.
3. Adoption of the 1984 Basic Existinq Structures COdE
- Mr. Skip Ninninger, Chief Building Official, was present to
answer any questions the Board might have. A copy of his report
is included in the packet of the Deputy Clerk.
Supervisor Nickens reported that his understanding of
this matter is that the Board must adopt the Code or some other
State Agency will adopt it and the County will have to comply
with their policy and interpretation of the Code. He also
reported that he has spoken with Mr. Ninninger concerning the
additional personnel needed and that these positions will be
submitted to Personnel and will be scrutinized as any other
requests are done.
Supervisor Nickens moved to concur with staff's
recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw anc
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens, McGraw, Garrett, and BrittlE
NAYS: None
4. Results of Survey and Recommendation for Employee
Recognition Events - Ms. Kathy Claytor, Personnel Analyst,
reported to the Board that the Department of Human Resources
surveyed county employees to identify reasons for declining
attendance at the Awards Dinner/Dance, the Employee Picnic, and
the Christmas Luncheon and to obtain suggestions for future
events. Ms. Claytor's report also included attendance
percentages of each event and the recommendation of the Employee
Advisory Committee. The Department of Human Resources
recommended continuation of the Christmas Luncheon; presentation
of service awards at a Board of Supervisors meeting in January;
, 161
October 28, 1986
ontinuation of the Dinner Dance as a purely social event, on a
ate selected in coordination with the Employee Advisory
ommittee; and continuation of the Employee/Volunteer Picnic on a
ate selected in coordination with the Employee Advisory
ommittee. The recommendations of the Department of Human
esources are the same as the Employee Advisory Committee except
hat the Employee Advisory Committee recommended the deletion of
he Employee/Volunteer picnic since the dinner/dance would be
uring the same season.
Supervisor Nickens suggested that the Department of
uman Resources consider moving the time of the picnic to later
in the day in order to provide possible increased participation.
Supervisor Nickens moved to concur with staff's
ecommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett
carried by a unanimous voice vote.
5. Inspection of Residential Facilities by Private
Firms - Mr. Gubala reported to the Board that a Joint
enate/House Subcommittee has been established to evaluate
ection 15.1-466 which relates to the use of private engineering
to review and inspect residential subdivision improvements.
attending a hearing on this matter, the Department of
that the use of private inspectors may have
should not be mandatory upon any local government and
evaluated when it becomes necessary.
Supervisor Garrett moved to concur with staff
ecommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw.
RESOLUTION 10-28-86-218 CONCERNING THE
SENATE JOINT SUBCOMMITTEE ESTABLISHED TO
INVESTIGATE THE OPERATION OF SECTION
15.1-466 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA RELATING
TO THE USE OF PRIVATE ENGINEERING FIRMS
TO REVIEW AND INSPECT RESIDENTIAL
SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, the General Assembly has formed a joint
ubcommittee to investigate the operation of Section 15.1-466 of
he Code of Virginia pertaining to the use of private engineering
..-. -.-,""~.,,-~-'"~..- - - '~---"-"".""'"''"-'"''-'--'---"-'--~'_._'-'-~--"
162
October 28, 1986
----~.-."._" -...",..~....~--~--.-. _.-".-.'.._-,-."..- ~~---- -"-~"'--'-''-''''~.'' '--""~--_.'~'-------'---
firms to review and inspect residential subdivision improvements;
and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County development staff has
investigated the matter and determined that the subcommittee
activities and hearings authorized by Senate Joint Resolution 47
does not currently affect land development activities in Roanoke
County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors requests that any findings and proposed
legislation from the subcommittee governing the use of private
engineering firms for subdivision development and building code
inspections be optional and not mandatory for local governments,
if the use of private engineering firms is expanded in
subdivision development and building code inspections.
On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor McGraw,
and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens, McGraw, Garrett, and Brittl
NAYS: None
6. Resolution in Support of Certifying the Judicial
Vacancy in the General District Court for Reappointment - Mr.
Mahoney reported that after the announcement of Judge Brice's
retirement from the General District Court Bench, the Committee
on District Courts recommended that the position not be certifie
for reappointment. He reported that if the judicial vacancy is
lost, there will be an adverse affect upon citizens attending
traffic and criminal court in the General District Court system.
Supervisor Brittle moved to approve the prepared
resolution. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson.
RESOLUTION 10-28-86-219 IN SUPPORT OF
CERTIFYING THE JUDICIAL VACANCY IN THE
GENERAL DISTRICT COURT FOR REAPPOINTMENT
WHEREAS, the Honorable James P. Brice, General Distric
Court judge of the Twenty-Third Judicial District recently
announced his impending retirement; and
163
October 28, 1986
WHEREAS, on October 10, 1986, the Committee on District
~ourts decided that the judicial vacancy on the General District
~ourt bench for the Twenty-Third Judicial District not be
certified for reappointment; and
WHEREAS, failure to certify this judicial vacancy for
eappointment will adversely affect the quality of justice for
he citizens of Roanoke County and the entire judicial district.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke County
30ard of Supervisors supports filling this vacancy in the
Pwenty-Third Judicial District, and maintaining the number of
þeneral District Court judges at five for the district; and
That the Committee on District Courts reconsider its
~ecision, and certify the vacancy on the General District Court
þench for the Twenty-Third Judicial District for reappointment;
~nd
FURTHER, the Board strongly recommends that the General
~ssembly for the Commonwealth of Virginia certify this vacancy
Çor reappointment.
The Deputy Clerk is hereby directed to mail a copy of
his Resolution to the Honorable Henry H. Whiting, Chairman,
~ommittee on District Courts; the Honorable Jack B. Coulter;
~onorable Edward S. Kidd, Jr.; the Honorable Kenneth E. Trabue;
Robert N. Baldwin, Executive Secretary, Supreme Court of
Jirginia; the Honorable G. Steven Agee; the Honorable C. Richard
'ranwell; the Honorable Dudley J. Emick, Jr.; the Honorable J.
~ranger Macfarlane; the Honorable A. victor Thomas; the Honorable
~lifton A. Woodrum; J. Randy Austin, Esquire, and M. Frederick
King, Esquire.
þn motion of Supervisor Brittle, seconded by Supervisor Johnson,
~nd upon the following recorded vote:
~YES: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens, McGraw, Garrett, and Brittle
~AYS : None
October 28, 1986
.) 164
-,~.._-'.,,~-,.._- -'._-- -"".._.~,.- '.- ........'~.<--
...._,.. -.~_.._- ..~. .._~".- ~ -_..- ---.....-.,-.-- -'.._~ ,,,> ,-~.~ - "'~-
IN RE:
REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
Chairman Brittle requested that the Board establish one
meeting date for the month of December instead of proceeding witt
the two regularly scheduled meetings.
Supervisor Nickens moved to hold only one Board meetinc
for the month of December and that that Board meeting be held on
December 16, 1986, at 3:00 p.m. The motion was seconded by
Supervisor McGraw and carried by a unanimous roll call vote.
IN RE:
CONSENT AGENDA
Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the Consent Agenda
with an amendment to number 3 to include confirmation of the
appointments of Paul Mahoney and George Garrettson to the
Constitutional Bicentennial Committee. The motion was seconded
by Supervisor Nickens.
RESOLUTION 10-28-86-220 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS
DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT
AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain section of the agenda of the
Board of Supervisors for October 28, 1986, designated as Item J -
Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as tc
each item separately set forth in said section designated Items
through 6, inclusive as follows:
1. Minutes of Meeting - October 14, 1986
2. Ratification of revisions to the By-laws of the
Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley.
3. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Court
Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family
Services Advisory Board and the Building Code Boarë
of Adjustments and Appeal.
**********AMENDED to include confirmation of the appointment of
, "165
~ 'f 1£ ~
October 28, 1986
Paul Mahoney and George Garrettson to the
Constitutional Bicentennial Committee.
4. Authorization for a reimbursement agreement with
Cave Spring Baptist Church.
5. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities in Beacon
Ridge, Section 2.
6. Confirmation of Appointments to the Transportation
Technical Committee.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Garrett to approve the Consent Agenda
with an amendment to number 3 to include the confirmation of the
appointment of Paul Mahoney and George Garrettson to the
:onstitutional Bicentennial Committee, seconded by Supervisor
~ickens, and upon the following recorded vote:
~YES: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens, McGraw, Garrett, and Brittle
~AYS: None
IN RE: REPORTS
Supervisor Nickens inquired about the building permit
~ees as recorded in the Development Data Report. The Board
directed Mr. Gubala to prepare a report for the November 11,
986, Board of Supervisors meeting.
TN RE:
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Supervisor Brittle moved to go into Executive Session
þursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a) (2) and (6). The
~otion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by a
µnanimous voice vote.
..N RE:
OPEN SESSION
.tÎ 1-66
October 28, 1986
-- ------. "._- -
Supervisor Johnson moved to return to Open Session.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle and carried by a
unanimous voice vote.
IN RE:
DINNER RECESS
Chairman Brittle declared a dinner recess at 5:15 p.m.
IN RE:
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Brittle called the meeting back to order at
7:03 p.m. with all members present.
IN RE:
FIRST READINGS OF ORDINANCES
The Deputy Clerk read the following first reading into
the record:
1. Ordinance amending Article II, Taxes on Tangible
Personal Property of Chapter 21, TAXATION of the Roanoke County
Code to provide for the proration of personal property tax, and
amending Article II, County Vehicle License of Chapter 12, Motor
Vehicles and Traffic to conform same to the proration
requirements.
Mr. Mahoney briefly described the ordinance to the
Board.
Supervisor Garrett reported that he has discussed this
proposed ordinance with the Commissioner of Revenue and feels
that there should be no problem.
Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the first reading
of this ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nicken
and carried by a unanimous roll call vote.
J ~7
October 28, 1986
2. Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing
he sale of surplus real estate, a portion of the Hidden Valley
unior High School property.
This matter was held over.
3. Ordinance accepting the conveyance of 0.19 acre of
~eal estate from Roanoke City.
Mr. Mahoney reported to the Board that this donation of
eal estate was accomplished by an ordinance adopted by the
Roanoke City Council on October 13. This land is to be used for
~ommunity improvement purposes, specifically this allows for the
ocation of a new road in the area of the Hollins Community
)evelopment Project.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the first reading
)f this ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens
~nd carried by a unanimous roll call vote.
N RE:
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
The Deputy Clerk read the following second readings
'nto the record:
1. Ordinance amending Chapter 3, Air Pollution of the
Roanoke County Code by the addition of a new section numbered 3-2
nd entitled Permitted Open Burning of Leaves from Trees. (HELD
)VER FROM OCTOBER 14, 1986)
Mr. Mahoney reported that this ordinance attempts to
~stablish areas where open burning of leaves is permitted. Mr.
ahoney pointed out paragraph (e) to the Board. This paragraph
~stablishes liability and responsibility for the fire suppression
~osts for any person who violates the provisions of the ordinance.
~r. Mahoney also noted that the effective date of this ordinance,
f approved by the Board, will be tomorrow, October 29, 1986.
Supervisor McGraw inquired about the process of
'itizens contacting the fire department to let them know they
j 168
October 28, 1986
,_._',"___ ...._..,...~,._~. e.', __'. ,~,_ --_,_.,"',"
'._.. ~.'~'-----'~-'-'--" '..'"'" .- - ._~_." ._~_. ".~'-"- - --
would be burning leaves. Mr. Mahoney reported that there is no
specific requirement within the ordinance. The Fire Department
is asking that citizens contact the dispatcher when they are
going to burn the leaves. Mr. Mahoney also responded that it
could be added to the ordinance but the enforcement would be
difficult. Supervisor McGraw inquired about the possibility of
charging citizens for the cost of sending out the fire trucks if
they have not contacted the dispatcher that they will be burning
leaves. Mr. Hodge responded that this is a matter he would like
to include in the ordinance but due to the lack of time and the
fact that the, the ordinance needs to be approved, because of thE
fast approaching season, he could not work out the details. He
reported that he would like to amend the ordinance next year to
include this provision.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the second reading
of the prepared ordinance with the amendment that paragraph 2 be
changed to show the effective date to be October 29, 1986. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens.
ORDINANCE 10-28-86-221 AMENDING CHAPTER
3, AIR POLLUTION OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY
CODE BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW SECTION
NUMBERED 3-2 AND ENTITLED PERMITTED
OPEN BURNING OF LEAVES FROM TREES
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Chapter 3, Air Pollution of the Roanoke Count'
Code be amended by the addition of a new section numbered 3-2 anc
entitled Permitted open burning of leaves from trees as follows:
Sec. 3-2. Permitted open burning of leaves from trees.
a. In areas of the county designated as "urban" areas
the open burning of leaves from trees is permitted after the hou
of 4:00 p.m. and before sunset on weekdays between September 15
and December 1 and between March 1 and May 15 subject to the
conditions of subsection c.
· '1. R 9
October 28, 1986
b. In areas of the county designated as "rural" areas,
~he open burning of leaves from trees is permitted after the
hours of 4:00 p.m. and before sunset on weekdays from March 1
hrough May 15 or at any time of the weekday during the rest of
he year, subject to the conditions of subsection c.
c. The following conditions apply to all open burning:
1. The burning takes place on the premises of the
private residence.
2. The location of the burning is not less than
300 feet from any occupied building unless the
occupant(s) has given prior written permission,
but in no case may it be any closer than fifty
(50) feet.
3. The fire shall be attended at all times by a
competent adult physically capable of taking
reasonable measures to control the fire.
d. All other open burning shall be regulated by the
ßtate Air Pollution Control Board or the provisions of the Fire
Prevention Code.
e. This section shall be enforced by the Fire Marshal
bf Roanoke County. violations of this section constitute a class
misdemeanor. If any fire shall originate as a result of a
~iolation by any person of this section, such person shall, in
ddition to the penalty, be liable to the county for the full
mount of all expenses incurred by the county in suppressing such
ire, such amount to be recoverable by action brought by the fire
arshal on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
~ounty.
2. The effective date of this ordinance shall be
þctober 29, 1986.
þn motion of Supervisor Johnson to approve the proposed ordinance
Þut that the effective date be October 29, 1986, seconded by
,upervisor Nickens and upon the following recorded vote:
October 28, 1986
·J·1<70
.- - ¥.-..,......-... .-
.', _,__,.~_._..__",.,"_." _~ _.~._.'._ _·d'..__'_·· N..··"_
~._-
__._.~....~....._._,,, ..,._.... ._..,_____.._._.........__.__.<_._·,...~'_n._" .' __.__._..__..._~__...~_._...._..._--
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens, McGraw, Garrett, and Brittl
NAYS: None
2. Ordinance authorizing the conveyance of .045 acre
of real estate to MRI Tanglewood Investments, Inc., in exchange
for .041 acre of real estate.
Supervisor Nickens moved the second reading of the
prepared ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor
Brittle.
ORDINANCE 10-28-86-222 AUTHORIZING THE
CONVEYANCE OF .045 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE
TO MRI TANGLEWOOD INVESTMENTS,
INCORPORATED IN EXCHANGE FOR .041 ACRES
OF REAL ESTATE
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of §18.04 of the
charter of Roanoke County, a first reading on the disposition an
exchange of the hereinafter described real estate was held on
October 14, 1986. A second reading on this matter will be held
on October 28, 1986. This real estate is located on Ogden Road
and Route 419 near Tanglewood Mall; and
2. That the conveyance of approximately .045 acres of
real estate from the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke to MRI
Tanglewood Investments, Incorporated in exchange for
approximately .041 acres is hereby authorized and approved; and
3. That the County Administrator is authorized to
execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanok
County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of this
property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County
Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Brittle
and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens, McGraw, Garrett, and Brittl
NA YS : None
·
171
October 28, 1986
IN RE:
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1086-1. Petition of W. S. Woody to rezone a .52 acre lot
from B-2 Business to B-3 Business to construct an
automobile wash located on Garst Mill Road in the
Windsor Hills Magisterial District. (Held Over From
September 23, 1986)
Mr. Buford Lumsden was present on behalf of Mr. W. S.
~oody. He reported that the land for which the rezoning is
requested is located on Garst Mill Road for the purpose of
constructing an automobile wash. He also reported that this
petition was before the Board on September 23, 1986, but was
delayed to provide time to perform a study concerning the water
recycling process.
Mr. W. S. Woody reported that after in-depth
investigation he has been unable to locate a reclamation system
that works at the level the Board desires. Mr. Woody introduced
Mr. Bill Daugherty of Magic Wand car washes to explain the
difficulty in locating a proper reclamation system.
Mr. Daugherty reported that the technology is not
available to create a reclamation system that can clean the water
well enough to use again. It is possible to separate oil and
solids but the water cannot be reused because of impurities. He
also reported that it is possible to reclaim rinse water in a
tunnel type car wash but it would be impossible in a self-service
wash, as Mr. Woody wishes to construct. Mr. Woody also provided
statistics on the amount of water a car wash uses versus the
amount of water used by someone washing a car with a typical
garden hose.
Supervisor Garrett inquired about the number of cars
washed on a weekday compared to cars washed on a weekend. Mr.
Daugherty responded that approximately 75 to 100 cars in a
· 1 1,2
~~
October 28, 1986
.__."__'" ~~..."'_' - ~_ .._'~.,_>~,.. --._,0",',' _ _"...._~.~
~-'-"" .,--,~. ..-_.,,-<.....,,- .-....- '--', _... _._'<- ..>.~,_._._..- -.-
five-bay or six-bay during the week and on weekends 400 vehicles
are washed.
Supervisor Nickens inquired about the amount of water
that can be recycled in an automatic car wash. Mr. Daugherty
responded that approximately 70 to 75 percent of rinse water can
be reclaimed and that no detergent water can be recycled.
There were no citizens present to speak on this matter
Supervisor Garrett reported that he is not comfortable
with this proposal because water reclamation is not possible and
the water situation in Roanoke County.
Supervisor Garrett moved to deny the petition. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle.
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Map~
as Parcel 77.09-4-57 and a portion of 77.09-4-52.4 and recorded
in Deed Book 1166, page 164 and Deed Book 1085, page 529, and
legally described below, be rezoned from B-2, Business District,
to B-3, Business District with proffered conditions.
BEGINNING at a point on the
easterly side of Virginia Secondary
Route 682 (Garst Mill Road) on the
old right-of-way line and the
southwesterly corner of a 14.68
acres tract; thence leaving the
right-of-way and with the common
property line N 77° 42' 00" E,
150.00 feet to a point; thence S.
9° 13' 30" E 130.00 feet to a
point; thence leaving the 0.452
acre tract, S. 21° 18' 24" E, 20.27
feet to a new point in the 0.44
acre tract; thence S. 77° 58' 10"
W., 151.07 feet to a point in the
easterly right-of-way line of
Secondary Route 682 (Garst Mill
Road); thence along the easterly
right-of-way line, N. 18° 19' 40"
W., 59.33 feet to the point of
intersection of the easterly
right-of-way line of the new
Secondary Route 682 and the old
right-of-way line; thence along a
curve to the left for an arc
distance of 90.86 feet (radius of
661.62 feet and a chord of N. 5°
17' 03" W., 90.79 feet) to the
, 1,73 '
October 28, 1986
point of BEGINNING, containing 0.52
acres and being all of property Tax
#77-04-04-57 and the northern 20
feet of Tax #77-09-04-52.4.
The above described lands were
acquired from Southern Land Company
by F&D Land Company, by Deed Book
1166, Page 164 (Tract C of Parcel
1) and also Deed Book 1085, Page
529 (Parcell) both of record in
the Roanoke County Circuit Court
Clerk's Office.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning commission and that
he be directed to reflect that change on the Official Zoning Map
of Roanoke County.
DENIED on motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by
Supervisor Brittle and upon the following recorded vote:
~YES: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens, McGraw, Garrett, and Brittle
NAYs: None
1086-2. Petition of D. N. Thompson to rezone a
0.29 acre tract from B-2 Business to
R-3 Residential to construct apartments
located on Plantation Road in the
Hollins Magisterial District. (HELD
OVER FROM SEPTEMBER 23, 1986)
Mr. William L. Martin was present representing the
petitioner. Mr. Martin reported that the size of the building
has been reduced by three feet in order to create the appropriate
side yard distances.
Mr. David F. Ragland, 7435 Plantation Road, NW,
~oanoke, Virginia, was present in opposition to this rezoning.
ße is opposed to this rezoning because he feels that it would
Ireduce the value of his property as well as the other property in
¡that area.
October 28, 1986
. 1 1·4
---_._J~.___.______
,··"____w.;.._.,_..,.,.._._~~
ù ..__<.____._."'^;_....-_~_.__.."... "". ___ ,_~
~,.,,"- -",~'~,." "-._-._-
-.. - --". ,- "'~~'._'.' _.~ ,_ ow."·,, '.__""_ _~.. .....,
Mr. Larry France, 7426 Indian Road, NW, HOllins,
Virginia, 24019, presented a petition in opposition to the
rezoning request.
Supervisor Nickens inquired about the parking spaces
needed for a four unit building. Mr. Gubala responded that two
spaces are needed per unit unless a variance is received.
Supervisor Johnson moved to deny the request of the
petitioner. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle.
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Map~
as Parcel 27.11-1-1 and recorded in Deed Book 554, page 326, and
legally described below, be rezoned from B-2 District to R-3
District.
BEGINNING at an iron pin on the
East side of Old Plantation Road at
corner of the George O. Dent
property;' thence with Plantation
Road on a curve whose chord is N.
23° 02' W. and radius is 1120.92,
and arch is 121.08, 121.00 feet to
a point; thence leaving said road
S. 61° 04' W. 51.48 feet to a point
on the west side of Route 1801;
thence with said road on a curve
whose chord is S. 60° 17' 40" E.,
whose radius is 120.00 and whose
arc is 53.75 feet, 53.31 feet to a
point on said road; thence S. 74°
17' 26" E. 45.00 feet to the west
side of Plantation Road; thence
with the west side of Plantation
Road, S. 21° 52' 26" E. to a point
on said road marked with an iron
pin; thence leaving said road N.
61° 04' E. 118.25 feet to the place
of BEGINNING.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
he be directed to reflect that change on the Official Zoning Map
of Roanoke County.
DENIED on motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by
Supervisor Brittle and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens, McGraw, Garrett, and BrittlE
-------~..__._~_._---~~----
~ '] 7 ~
October 28, 1986
NAYS: None
1086-3. Petition of Wally L. Andrews for a special Exception
Permit to operate a turkey shoot at 3122 Eastland
Road, S.E., in the vinton Magisterial District.
(Petitioner has withdrawn his request)
1086-4. Petition of Region Properties to rezone 44.39 acres
from R-l, Residential, to R-3, Residential, to
construct townhomes and/or detached homes located on
the east side of Merriman Road at Ranchcrest Road in
the Cave Spring Magisterial District.
Mr. Steve Strauss, representing Region properties, was
present to answer any questions the Board might have. He
presented a slide presentation which showed the type of
ievelopment this project would be when completed. Mr. Strauss
=xplained that the project has been changed from single family
iwellings to townhomes. Region Properties changed the plan to
~ownhomes because natural vegetation will not have to be
iisturbed as much and would be necessary for construction of
;ingle family dwellings.
Supervisor Johnson inquired if the proposed development
~or townhomes is not approved, will Region Properties continue
~ith the single family development. Mr. Strauss reported that
Region Properties plans to proceed with development if the
ownhome proposal is denied this evening.
Supervisor Nickens inquired about the water supply.
~r. Strauss responded that the water will be supplied by the Penn
~orest water system which is solely supplied by wells. Roanoke
:ounty Engineering Department has assured Mr. Strauss that there
~s an adequate water supply in this system.
Supervisor McGraw inquired about the price range of the
;imilar properties in Kenwick Place. Mr. Strauss reported that
October 28, 1986
,,¡ ~:.l ,76
--.---- .-
- "'-_..,,'~_' ..'~'"
'''~'.~'. ....--.-... ...-
Kenwick Place properties started at $89,950.00 with the most
expensive costing approximately $120,000.00. Mr. Strauss also
reported that this is the same approximate price of the townhomeE
in question at this rezoning.
Mr. Doug Williams, 5646 Ingleside Drive, SW, Roanoke,
Virginia, 24018, was present in opposition to this rezoning
request. Mr. Williams spoke on behalf of the citizens in that
area. They are opposed to the rezoning request because the
number of single family homes or townhomes is too many for the
amount of land. They were also afraid that the town homes would
be bought and rented to other people and that the quality of the
townhomes would decline.
Supervisor Garrett inquired if Mr. Strauss had
performed a marketing survey. Mr. Strauss reported that he has
performed a marketing study to some extent. He has talked with
realtors and homeowners concerning the type of homes they would
prefer to purchase.
Supervisor Johnson asked about the value of the
proposed single family homes. Mr. Strauss reported that the
homes would range from $80,000 to $90,000. Supervisor Johnson
also inquired about a Homeowner's Association to maintain the
property. Mr. Strauss responded that the streets will be built
to state standards and accepted into the Highway System and that
the main purpose of a Homeowner's Association is for street
maintenance. Mr. Strauss also reported that restrictive
covenants will be developed that will govern what the homeowners
can do to their property as far as changing the original
appearance.
Chairman Brittle announced that he had called several
numbers on the petition submitted to the Planning Commission.
He reported that he would like to table this matter in order to
hold a meeting on November 13 from 7 to 8:30 p.m. for the
citizens in that area to discuss water, traffic, and other issue~.
.. ·1 ., fly
October 28, 1986
~r. John Peters, Roanoke County Road Coordinator and Mr. Donald
~itt, Chairman of the Roanoke County Planning Commission will be
)resent to work with the citizens.
Chairman Brittle moved to table this matter until
~ovember 25, 1986. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
1086-5. Petition of Robert B. King to rezone 61.62 acres
from M-2 Industrial to A-I Agricultural to place a
mobile home located 1,000 feet south of the terminus
of Garman Road in the Catawba Magisterial District.
Mr. Robert King was present to answer any questions the
~oard might have. Mr. King requested that the Board rezone two
cres of land to place a mobile home.
Supervisor McGraw inquired if the mobile home is a
ouble wide which requires a permanent foundation, will be taxed
s real estate, and other conditions as required under the mobile
-"
lome ordinance. Mr. Gubala responded that Mr. King originally
equested rezoning of 61 acres and that after discussions with
he Planning Commission, reduced the size of his request and that
11 conditions have been met and that only one mobile home will
>e allowed on the two acres.
Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the petition with a
wo acre maximum lot size as shown on the submitted plat. The
otion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett.
There were no citizens present to speak on this matter.
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
arcel of land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps
s Parcel 55.03-2-14 and legally described below, be rezoned from
1-2, Industrial, to A-l, Agricultural.
BEGINNING at the westerly corner of
a 2.00 acre tract of Robert B. King
and Dorothy Mae King, said corner
being the common corner of Robert
B. Kingh property, Franklin Real
Estate property, and Norfolk and
~
:::
October 28, 1986
¡, 178
. ~-""~^._. ~--~->~~-
-,-.-.---.-.""
--- - - ~-
---- -----
W~stern Railroad; thence with the
rl?ht-of-way of Norfolk and Western
Rallroad N. 560 25' 00" E. 295.35
feet to a point; thence along a new
boundary line S. 230 05' 00" E
300.00 feet to a new point; th~nce
along a new boundary line S. 560
25' 00" W. 295.35 feet to aq point
o~ the boundary line of Robert B.
Klng property and Franklin Real
Estate property; thence along said
boundary line N. 230 05' 00" w. 300
feet to the place of beginning.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map
of Roanoke County.
ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor McGraw to approve the
rezoning of two acres maximum lot size as shown on the submitted
plat. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried
by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens, McGraw, Garrett, and BrittlE
NAYS: None
1086-6. Petition of Adams Construction Company to rezone
three parcels of land from RE, Residential Estates,
to M-2, General Industrial, located on Route 768 in
the Catawba Magisterial District.
Mr. Dan Layman, attorney for Adams Construction
Company, was present to answer any questions the Board might havE.
He reported that these parcels are under the airport industrial
area of the Comprehensive Plan and that the purpose of this
rezoning is to create an industrial park. Mr. Layman reported
that in the proffer of conditions, his client has agreed to seek
the closing of a larger portion of Olsen Road in accordance with
the wishes of the residents of that area.
Mr. Lawrence Barger, 8449 Olsen Road, Roanoke,
Virginia, was present in opposition to the rezoning request. He
reported that the main concern of the residents in that area is
~- -------------
~..--------------_._-
~ 1" Q
October 28, 1986
--:
Road becoming an access to this
~he possibility of Olsen
~ommercial property.
He requested that this be put in writing
, w1.'ll not use the road as an access.
I~hat Adams Construct1.on
d petition from the residents in that area
Barger also presente a
Mr.
;tating their objection to the use of Olsen Road as an access.
Phe residents are also concerned about the buffer zone. They
Hould like to see more of a buffer zone since the existing
Þroperty of Adams Construction is thirty feet from the closest
:louse.
Ms. Jodi Fitzgerald, 4858 Olsen Road, Roanoke,
virginia, reported to the Board that her house will be at the end
Jf the proposed cul-de-sac and requested that the Board have a
street light installed as she is having problems with cars
parking in front of her house. The Board explained to Ms.
~itzgerald that she would officially have to go through the
street light application process in order to obtain a street
ight.
Supervisor McGraw inquired if Adams Construction would
be willing to install the street light at the end of the
~ul-de-sac. Mr. Layman responded that Adams Construction would
be willing to install this street light.
Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the rezoning request
Nith proffered conditions and with the understanding that a
street light will be installed at the cul-de-sac by the
petitioner. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson.
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
)arcels of land, which are contained in the Roanoke County Tax
~aps as Parcels 26.15-1-2, 26.18-1-2, and 26.18-1-3 and legally
ìescribed in Schedule A attached hereto, be rezoned from RE,
~esidential Estates District to M-2, General Industrial District,
;ubject to the following conditions:
October 28, 1986
í 1. 80
~ ,,-,- - .,..~ "'-
^ __'.~·.·m_~~,_.~,
" -~.,.,...,>"_._- -.
II
~,.- _.-~~.,._"~.~.~
.'. e"*'_"'__"'__""~_'_"___'"
--~~. --~ __n_________
(1) The land shall not be used for any of the
following uses: battery manufacture, blacksmith shop, brick
manufacturing plants, sawmills, wood yards, spinning mills,
public utility generating booster or relay station.
(2) The Petitioner will apply to the appropriate
officials of Roanoke County and the Commonwealth of Virginia for
closing of that portion of State Secondary Route 768 (Olsen Road
located adjacent to the 7.65 acre tract and the property of
Petitioner adjoining the 7.65 acre tract to the northeast and
will, if requested by such officials as a condition of the
closing, construct at Petitioner's expense a cul-de-sac at the
new terminus of Route 768.
(3) The Petitioner will not install or have installed
any water well on the 7.65 acre tract.
Legal Description of property:
PARCEL I (Tax Map No. 26.15-1-2
Beginning at Corner 1, an iron pin
set in the south right of way line
of Virginia Secondary Route 768,
5.04 feet northeast of a Virginia
Department of Highways and
Transportation concrete monument,
corner to property of Adams
Construction Company, thence with
Route 768 N. 66° 56' 14" E. 64.02
feet to Corner 2, a concrete
monument; thence still with Route·
768 N. 39° 55' 52" W. 20.00 feet to
Corner 3, a concrete monument;
thence still with Route 768 N. 47°
45' 27" E. 257.77 feet to Corner 4,
a concrete monument; thence still
with Route 768 N. 53° 49' 49" E.
253.08 feet to Corner 5, an iron
pin set in the south right of way
of Route 768; thence leaving Route
768 and with the property of Adams
Construction Company the following
courses and distances: S. 10° 37'
00" E. 237.50 feet to Corner 6, an
iron pin; S. 16° 01' 00" E. 351.50
feet to Corner 7, an iron pipe; S.
13° 22' 00" E. 283.00 feet to
Corner 8, an iron pin; S. 43° 14'
00" E. 144.30 feet to Corner 9, an
iron pin; S. 56° 36' 00" W. 220.50
feet to Corner 10, a concrete
monument; and N. 38° 22' 00" w.
905.64 feet to Corner 1, the place
of Beginning, containing 7.67
.þ.
, 1.ß1
October 28, 1986
~
acres, as shown on plat dated
December 3, 1985, by Buford T.
Lumsden & Associates, P.C., a copy
of which was attached hereto and
recorded with the hereinafter
described deed; and
BEING the same property conveyed to
Adams Construction Company, a
Virginia corporation, from Brevard
H. Holland (also known as Brevard
Henry Holland), widower (not
remarried), by deed dated December
3, 1985, recorded in the Clerk's
Office of the Circuit Court of
Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed
Book 1229, page 1720.
PARCEL II (Tax Map nos. 26.18-1-2
and 16.18-1-3)
BEGINNING at 1 in a road opposite a
pine stump, corner Olridge Carter;
thence with Carter N. 42 W. 5
87/100 poles to a stake at 2;
thence N. 75 W. 21 6/10 poles to a
stake at 3; thence with a new line
N 63 E. 52 44/10 poles to a stake
at 4 on Elless line; thence with
same S. 21 1/2 E 20 4/10 poles to a
stake at edge of road at 5; thence
along road s 63 1/4 W. 32 43/100
poles to the BEGINNING, containing
5 acres 21 6/10 poles.
THERE IS EXCEPTED from the above
described property 1.62 acres
thereof which was conveyed by Ruth
Wright Jackson, widow, to the
Commonwealth of Virginia, to be
used for Route 1-81, be deed dated
September 22, 1961, recorded in the
Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court
for Roanoke County, Virginia, in
Deed Book 689, page 217.
BEING the same property conveyed to
Adams Construction Company, a
Virginia partnership, from Stearns
Wright, Jr., unmarried, by deed
dated September 12, 1983, recorded
in the Clerk's Office of the
Circuit Court of Roanoke County,
Virginia, in Deed Book 1210, page
1422.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
ransmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
e be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map
f Roanoke County.
October 28, 1986
t},82.
~--'''''<~.'''._-- ..-
--'.~"--'-'--"~
ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor McGraw
to approve the
rezoning request with proffered conditions and with the
understanding that the Petitioner wl'll '
lnstall a street light at
the cul-de-sac, seconded b S '
Y upervlsor Johnson and upon the
following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Nickens, McGraw, Garrett, and Brittl~
None
NAYS:
PROFFER OF CONDITIONS
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
Being in accord with Section 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the
Code of Virginia and Section 2l-l05E. of the Roanoke County
Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner Adams Construction Company
hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, the following conditions to the
rezoning of the above-referenced parcels of land:
(1) The land shall not be used for any of the
following uses: battery manufacture, blacksmith shop, brick
manufacturing plants, sawmills, wood yards, spinning mills,
public utility generating booster or relay station.
(2) The petitioner will apply to the appropriate
officials of Roanoke County and the Commonwealth of virginia for
closing of that portion of State Secondary Route 768 (Olsen Road
located adjacent to the 7.65 acre tract and the property of
Petitioner adjoining the 7.65 acre tract to the northeast and
will, if requested by such officials as a condition of the
closing, construct at Petitioner's expense a cul-de-sac at the
new terminus of Route 768.
(3) The petitioner will not install or have installed
any water well on the 7.65 acre tract.
1086-7. Petition of Nicholas Munger to rezone 39.9 acres
from RE, Residential Estates, and M-l, Industrial,
to R-l, Residential, to develop a single family
-- ~--
--,-~._--------_..~
, '1 ~,.
October 28, 1986
subdivision located south of starkey Road in the
Cave Spring Magisterial District.
Mr. Ed Natt was present on behalf of the petitioner to
answer any questions the Board might have. Mr. Natt reported
Lhat this property was originally zoned single-family
~esidential. The petitioner is requesting rezoning to construct
a subdivision of not more than 60 lots with single-family
~etached residential units. Mr. Natt reported that the Planning
:ommission requested that the petitioner proffer that no
~riveways would be on Starkey Road, that the roads within the
subdivision would be constructed to the standards of the State
ßighway Department and submitted for approval to the State, that
ßhould the right-of-way on Route 904 be less than 60 feet, then
ILhe petitioner will dedicate up to five feet in order to provide
or the widening to the 60 feet width. The Petitioner has
proffered these conditions. Mr. Natt also reported that there
Has no opposition at the Planning Commission meeting.
Supervisor Brittle presented a letter from Mr. Bob
:raighead of Norfolk-Southern to Mr. Natt. Mr. Natt reported
hat the property in question does not actually touch railroad
property.
Supervisor Johnson inquired about the buffer zone
)etween the property in question and the railway easement. Mr.
~att reported that the strip of land between the railway easement
~nd his property is owned by I. M. McNeil.
Chairman Brittle requested elevation figures for the
Jroperty. Mr. Natt responded that elevations were done
Jreviously when the property was to be rezoned for apartment
'omplexes but that he did not have exact elevation figures but
he site plan was designed with elevation figures in mind.
Supervisor Brittle moved to deny the petition to
~ezone. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson.
October 28, 1986
f 184
-.~. ~--_.- -
- - ~ ~ . - .
-- ',-" ....- '~-"""._,.",
". -.- .-..-.----..-,..-.
.." _. 0" ..h__
l
Mr. Nicholas Munger responded to the Board's motion
that if he had known th t h
a t ere was some concern on the part of
the Supervisors that he could h b·
ave 0 talned a petition from the
residents of the neighborhood who support the rezoning request.
The motion of Supervisor Brittle to deny carried by thE
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Garrett, and Brittle
NAYS: None
HERE: Supervisor Nickens
Supervisor Nickens requested that his vote be recorded
as "Here" due to missing information from the presentation.
Supervisor McGraw reported that he is concerned about
the absence of information from this public hearing and requeste(
that further thought be given to ways to integrate the use of M-
and R-l.
Supervisor Brittle reported to Mr. Natt that he would
be willing to reconsider this matter at the next board meeting.
Supervisor Brittle moved to reconsider the petition of
Nicholas Munger. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw
and carried by a unanimous roll call vote.
Supervisor Brittle moved to table this matter until
November 25, 1986. Supervisor Nickens called for questions on
the motion. The motion carried by a unanimous roll call vote.
1086-8. Petition of North Bellview Corp. to rezone .75 acre
from M-l, Industrial, to B-2, Business, located at
the corner of Centurion Road and Peters Creek Road
in the Catawba Magisterial District
Mr. Ed Natt was present on behalf of the petitioner to
answer any questions the Board might have.
Supervisor Johnson moved to grant the petition. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle.
FINAL ORDER
~~----
t '1 ~5
October 28, 1986
=
parcel of
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps
as Parcel 37.08-1-4 and legally described below, be rezoned from
~-l, Industrial District, to B-2, Business District.
BEGINNING at a point on the
northerly side of Peters Creek Road
at its point of intersection with
the westerly side of Centurion
Road; thence N. 33° 56' 30" w.
202.69 feet to a point; thence from
said point S. 56° 03' 30" W. 114.27
feet to a point; thence from said
point S. 54° 48' 00" E. 216.72 feet
to a point on the northerly side of
Peters Creek Road; thence with the
northerly side of Peters Creek Road
in a westerly direction, an arc
distance of 36.52 feet to the place
of BEGINNING
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this order be
ransmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
1e be directed to reflect that change on the Official zoning Map
)f Roanoke County.
ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by
5upervisor Brittle and upon the following recorded vote:
~YES: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens, McGraw, Garrett, and Brittle
~AYS: None
PROFFER OF CONDITIONS
PO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
Being in accord with Section 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the
:ode of Virginia and Section 21-105E of the Roanoke County zoning
Jrdinance, the Petitioner, North Bellview Corp., hereby
~oluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
:ounty, Virginia, the following conditions to the rezoning of the
~bove-referenced parcel of land.
(1) That any sign for the property shall be located on
Peters Creek Road.
(2) That the screening around the parking lot at the
~ime of planting shall be three (3) feet tall.
:-
---------
-=
------..--,.,- ··.·""_._.k.,.____,~.,___~_~ _"", ......_.__..,_._
October 28, 1986
"1~6
... .. ...--.--...--.--
- '-'-... ·_····_···~··..~w"....."_ "0-'_0"_ ._..._~
'--~'"'''''' '^---.-.,
=
(3) That all lighting shall be directed away from the
adjoining residential property.
(4) That the existing use not provided for on the
property shall be vacated.
of the building to determine if it is feasible to move the
(5) That the developer shall re-evaluate the location
building closer to Peters Creek Road.
IN RE:
ADJOURNMENT
Chairman Brittle adjourned the meeting at 9:55 p.m.
Chairman