9/25/1984 - Special
~
15 3
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Center
3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24015
I
September 25, 1984
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, met this day at T-Bone Charlie's, 3655
Brambleton Avenue, SW, Roanoke, Virginia, this being a special
meeting called for the dedication of the Brambleton Avenue
stoplights.
IN RE:
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Nickens called the meeting to order at 12:10
p.m. The roll call was taken.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chairman Harry C. Nickens, Vice-Chairman
I
Athena E. Burton, Supervisors McGraw and
Brittle
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Supervisor Gary J. Minter
IN RE:
DEDICATION
The Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation
was represented by Mr. Buddy Taylor, Mr. Fred Altizer, Mr. Gene
Wood, and Mr. B. W. Sumpter. The representatives of the Highway
Department explained the process of timing on the stoplights and
the actual workng parts of the stoplights.
IN RE:
ADJOURNMENT
I
Supervisor McGraw moved to adjourn at 1:33 p.m.
µ~~
Chairman
-
~
r
I
I
I
I
J_ ~
September 25, 1984
I
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Center
3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24015
September 25, 1984
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County
Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the
second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of September,
1984.
IN RE:
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Nickens called the meeting to order at 3:06
I
p.m. The roll call was taken.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chairman Harry C. Nickens; Vice
Chairman Athena E. Burton;
Supervisors Minter, Brittle, and
McGraw
None
IN RE:
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Supervisor Brittle moved to go into Executive Session
pursuant to the Code of Virginia, Section 2.1-344(a), 1, 2, 4,
and 6. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
IN RE: OPEN SESSION
I
Supervisor Brittle moved to return to Open Session at
4:45 p.m. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
Work Session - Professional Services to Evaluate
Community Services Organization. Donald R. Flanders, County
Administrator, reported that the Board had directed that he
~
~
""If; 5
September 25, 1984
proceed with advertising for a professional agency to provide an
evaluation of the various agencies that have been funded through
the Human Resources Committee. Roanoke County has received only
I
one proposal, the Roanoke Valley Council of Community Services,
Inc. The Human Services Committee had previously recommended to
the Board that no allocation be made from the original
appropriation for this service. Mr. Prillaman, Chairman of the
Human Services Committee and Mr. Campbell of the Roanoke Valley
Council of Community Services were present to answer any
questions of the Board. Supervisor Burton asked for the
reactions of the Human Services Committee toward the Roanoke
Valley Council of Community Services, Inc. Mr. Prillaman stated
that the Committee's only concern was that they did not want to
take the $1,200 out of its allocation to pay for this service.
Supervisor Burton question the amount of time proposed for the
I
tasks requested. If there is not enough time, she wanted to know
how they would determine what needed to be deleted. She
requested that the wording of the agreement between the County
and the contractor to be that this work will get done for the
amount of money allocated ($1,200). Supervisor Minter moved to
spread a resolution accepting the proposal from the Roanoke
Valley Council of Community Services, Inc. and allocating a
maximum of $1,200 to provide for their services.
RESOLUTION 84-173 ACCEPTING A PROPOSAL TO
EVALUATE FUNDING FOR HUMAN AND COMMUNITY
SERVICES
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the proposal of the Roanoke Valley Council of
I
Community Services, Inc. dated September 5, 1984, to evaluate the
community and human services provided to Roanoke County residents
in relation to funding provided to community service agencies, is
hereby accepted; and
-
~
15ti
~
September 25, 1984
2. That the proposed evaluation process is in
accordance with the scope of work contained in the "request for
I
proposals," and the fee for said services shall be in an amount
not to exceed $1,200.00; and
3. That the General Appropriation Resolution of
Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 12, 1984, be, and same
hereby is, amended as follows to become effective September 25,
1984:
ACCOUNT NUMBER
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
Expenditures
General
Human Resource Committee
Object: Professional
03-6-09104-30020 $1,200
Services
Department: Unappropriated
Balance
03-6-99999-99999
($1,200)
I
To appropriate money for Human Resource Committee to
evaluate service organizations receiving funds from the County.
On motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Minter, Brittle, and McGraw
NAYS: Supervisors Burton and Nickens.
Chairman Nickens requested that a letter of
communication to go to each agency outlining what is being asked
of them by Roanoke County.
IN RE:
REPORTS OF OFFICERS, DEPARTMENTS AND COMMITTEES
1. Industrial Development Authority - Donald R.
I
Flanders, County Administrator, requested that Mr. Ed Natt and
Mr. Gubala, Superintendent of the Department of Development,
present the data reviewed and adopted by the Industrial
Development Authority. Mr. Natt spoke on behalf of the
Industrial Development Authority.
~
I~
r
157
September 25, 1984
Mr. Natt reported that Roanoke County has been
allocated $ 5,535,000.00. The Industrial Development Authority
totalled $12 million. The Authority recommends to the Board that
I
has allocated those funds for certain projects. The requests
they authorize Mr. Flanders to execute requests from the State
Reserve for the additional $7 million.
Supervisor Burton moved to approve projects of the
local board of the Industrial Development Authority and to
request funds from the State Reserve.
RESOLUTION 84-163 REQUESTING INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT BOND FUNDS FROM THE STATE RESERVE
AND AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO
EXECUTE THIS APPLICATION THEREFOR
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the following requests for funds from the
State Reserve for Industrial Development Authority bond funds for
I
the 1984 calendar year be, and the same hereby are, approved:
Fralin & Waldron Commercial Realty - $100,000
Fralin & Waldron, Inc. - $900,000
Tim Thielecke - $3,250,000
William S. Woody & Kenneth S. Gusler, Jr. - $1,400,000
Maury Strauss - $650,000
Springwood Associates - $520,000
Ron Thompson - $350,000
2. That the County Administrator is authorized to
execute the application for such requests from the State Reserve.
RESOLUTION 84-164 APPROVING THE PLAN OF FINANCING AND
THE ISSUANCE OF THE BOND BY THE INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY FOR THE
BENEFIT OF VINTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of
Roanoke County, Virginia, (the Authority) has considered the
application of Vinton Real Estate Investments (the Purchaser) for
the issuance of the Authority's industrial development revenue
I
bond in the amount not to exceed $395,000 (the Bond) to assist in
the financing of the Purchaser's acquisition, construction and
equipping of an office facility (the Facility) in Roanoke County,
Virginia, and has held a public hearing thereon on August 30,
-----
1984; and
~
,.,
15 ~
September 25, 1984
I
WHEREAS, the Authority has recommended that the Board
of Supervisors (the Board of Supervisors) of Roanoke County,
Virginia (the County), approve the plan of financing for the
Facility to comply with Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1954, as amended; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving
the plan of financing, subject to terms to be agreed upon, and a
record of the public hearing has been filed with the Board of
Supervisors.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Board of Supervisors approves the plan of
financing and the issuance of the Bond by the Authority for the
benefit of the Purchaser, to the extent required by Section
103(k), to permit the Authority to assist in the financing of the
Facility.
I
I
2. That the approval of the plan of financing and the
issuance of the Bond, as required by Section 103(k), does not
constitute an endorsement of the Bond, the financing viability of
the Facility or the credit worthiness of the purchaser. Further,
as required by Section 15.1-1380 of the Code of Virginia of 1950,
as amended, the Bond shall provide that neither the Commonwealth
of Virginia, the County nor the Authority shall be obligated to
pay the principal of, premium, if any, the interest or
supplemental interest thereon, or other costs incident thereto
except from the revenues and moneys pledged therefor and other
application security, and neither the faith, credit, nor the
taxing power of the Commonwealth, the County or the Authority
shall be pledged thereto.
3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon
its adoption.
Adopted on motion of Supervisor Burton and the
following roll call vote:
~
u
"..-
15 ~
September 25, 1984
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Brittle, Burton, McGraw, Nickens
NAYS:
None
RESOLUTION 84-165 APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF
THE BOND BY THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, FOR THE BENEFIT
OF RONALD S. THOMPSON, JR.
I
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of
Roanoke County, Virginia (the Authority), has considered the
application of Ronald S. Thompson, Jr. (the Owner), 358 West
Campbell Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia 24016, requesting the
issuance of the Authority's industrial development revenue bond
in an amount estimated at $350,000 (the Bond) to assist in the
financing of the Owner's construction and equipping of an office
and retail facility on the north side of Route 419 adjacent to
the Entre Computer Center, Roanoke County, Virginia, and has held
a public hearing thereon on August 30, 1984; and
WHEREAS, Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of
I
1954, as amended, provides that the governmental unit having
jurisdiction over the issuer of industrial development bonds and
over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of
industrial development bonds is located must approve the issuance
of the bonds; and
WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of
Roanoke County, Virginia (the County), the Project is to be
located in the County of Roanoke, Virginia, and the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia (the Board) constitutes
the highest elected governmental officials of the County; and
WHEREAS, the Authority recommends that the Board of
Supervisors approve the issuance of the Bond; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving
I
the issuance of the Bond, subject to the terms to be agreed upon,
and a certificate of the public hearing has been filed with the
Board of Supervisors.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
-
County, Virginia:
l
160 ~
September 25, 1984
-
1. That the Board of Supervisors approves the issuance
of the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, as
I
required by Section 103(k), to permit the Authority to assist in
the financing of the Project.
2. That the approval of the issuance of the Bond, as
required by Section 103(k), does not constitute an endorsement to
a prospective purchaser of the Bond of the credit-worthiness of
the Project or the Company, and, as required by Section 15.1-1380
of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the Bond shall provide
that neither the County nor the Authority shall be obligated to
pay the Bond or the interest thereon or other costs incident
thereto except from the revenues and moneys pledged therefor and
neither the faith or credit nor the taxing power of the
Commonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged
I
thereto.
3. That this Resolution shall take effect immediately
upon its adoption.
Adopted upon motion of Supervisor Burton and the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Brittle, Burton, McGraw, Nickens
NAYS:
None
RESOLUTION 84-166 APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF
THE BOND BY THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, FOR THE BENEFIT OF
SPRINGWOOD ASSOCIATES
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of
Roanoke County, Virginia (the Authority), has considered the
application of Springwood Associates (the Owner), 3022 Trinkle
I
Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia 24012, requesting the issuance of the
Authority's industrial development revenue bond in an amount
estimated at $1,200,000 (the Bond) to assist in the financing of
the Owner's construction and equipping of an office and retail
facility on the north side of Route 419 at the intersection of U.
S. Route 221, Roanoke County, Virginia, and has held a public
hearing thereon on June 26, 1984; and
-
~
"..- 1 cr~~.,.' .~
't~j 1.
September 25, 1984
WHEREAS, Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1954, as amended, provides that the governmental unit having
jurisdiction over the issuer of industrial development bonds and
I
over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of
industrial development bonds is located must approve the issuance
of the bonds; and
WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of
Roanoke County, Virginia (the County), the Project is to be
located in the County of Roanoke, Virginia, and the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia (the Board) constitutes
the highest elected governmental officials of the County; and
WHEREAS, the Authority recommends that the Board of
Supervisors approve the issuance of the Bond; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving
the issuance of the Bond, subject to the terms to be agreed upon,
I
and a certificate of the public hearing has been filed with the
Board of Supervisors.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia:
1. That the Board of Supervisors approves the issuance
of the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, as
required by Section 103(k), to permit the Authority to assist in
the financing of the Project.
2. That the approval of the issuance of the Bond, as
required by Section 103(k), does not constitute an endorsement to
a prospective purchaser of the Bond of the credit-worthiness of
the Project or the Company, and, as required by Section 15.1-1380
that neither the County nor the Authority shall be obligated to
I
of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the Bond shall provide
pay the Bond or the interest thereon or other costs incident
thereto except from the revenues and moneys pledged therefor and
neither the faith or credit nor the taxing power of the
-
~
162
~
September 25, 1984
Commonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged
thereto.
I
3. That this Resolution shall take effect immediately
upon its adoption.
Adopted upon motion of Supervisor Burton and the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Supervisors Minter, Brittle, Burton, McGraw, Nickens
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 84-167 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR THE BENEFIT
OF J. B. GORIA
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of
Roanoke County (the "Authority") has considered the application
of J. B. Goria, or an entity in which he has an interest (the
"Purchaser") for the issuance of the Authority's industrial
I
development revenue bond in an amount not to exceed $4,000,000
(the "Bond") to assist in the financing of acquiring,
constructing and equipping a shopping center and office park,
approximately 44,400 square feet in size (the "Facility") to be
owned by the Purchaser and located at the intersection of Route
419 and Colonial Avenue in Roanoke County, Virginia, and has held
a public hearing thereon on September 24, 1984; and
WHEREAS, the Authority has recommended that the Board
of Supervisors (the "Board of Supervisors") of Roanoke County,
Virginia (the "County"), approve the plan of financing for the
Facility to comply with Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1054, as amended (the "Code"); and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving
I
the plan of financing and the issuance of the Bond, subject to
terms to be agreed upon, a fiscal impact statement, and a record
of the public hearing have been filed with the Board of
Supervisors.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
-----
~
~
1 t~ :3
September 25, 1984
1.
That the Board of Supervisors approves the plan of
financing and the issuance of the Bond by the Authority for the
103(k) of the Code, to permit the Authority to assist in
I
benefit of the Purchaser, to the extent required by Section
financing of the Facility.
2. The approval of the plan of financing and the
issuance of the Bond, as required by Section 103(k) of the Code,
does not constitute an endorsement of the Bond, the financial
viability of the Facility or the creditworthiness of the
Purchaser. Further, as required, the Bond shall provide that
neither the Commonwealth of Virginia, the County nor the
Authority shall be obligated to pay the principal of, premium, if
any, the interest or supplemental interest thereon, or other
costs incident thereto except from the revenues and moneys
pledged therefor and other applicable security, and neither the
faith, credit, nor the taxing power of the Commonwealth, the
I
County or the Authority shall be pledged thereto.
3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon
its adoption.
Adopted upon motion of Supervisor Burton and the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Brittle, Burton, McGraw, Nickens
NAYS:
None.
RESOLUTION 84-168 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE
OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BONDS FOR
THE BENEFIT OF F & W COMMERCIAL RENTAL
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of
Roanoke County, Virginia (the "Authority"), has considered the
application of F & W Commercial Rental, requesting the issuance
I
of the Authority's industrial development revenue bonds in an
amount estimated at $4,100,000.00 (the "Bond") to assist in the
financing of the Company's construction and equipping of an
addition to an existing office facility in Roanoke County,
-----
~
..,
16 :1
September 25, 1984
Virginia, and has held a public hearing thereon on September 24,
1984; and
I
WHEREAS, Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1954, as amended, provides that the governmental unity having
jurisdiction over the issuer of industrial development bonds and
over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of
industrial development bonds is located must approve the issuance
of the bonds; and
WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of
Roanoke County, Virginia (the "County"), the Project is to be
located in the County of Roanoke, Virginia, and the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, (the "Board")
constitutes the highest elected governmental officials of the
County; and
WHEREAS, the Authority recommends that the Board of
Supervisors approve the issuance of the Bond; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving
the issuance of the Bond, subject to the terms to be agreed upon,
and a certificate of the public hearing has been filed with the
Board of Supervisors.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Board of Supervisors approves the issuance
of the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, as
required by Section 103(k), to permit the Authority to assist in
the financing of the Project.
2. That the approval of the issuance of the Bond, as
required by Section 103(k), does not constitute an endorsement to
a prospective purchaser of the Bond of the creditworthiness of
the Project or the Company, and, as required by Section 15.1-1380
of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, the Bond shall
provide that neither the County nor the Authority shall be
obligated to pay the Bond or the interest thereon or other costs
I
I
-----
~
"..-
1 .ff· ~'
r{~' ¡
,j ;)
~OT"\t-~_1....~- ')~ 10QA
incident thereto except from the revenues and moneys pledged
therefor and neither the faith or credit nor the taxing power of
the Commonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged
I
thereto.
3. That this Resolution shall take effect immediately
upon its adoption.
Adopted upon motion of Supervisor Burton and the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Supervisors Minter, Brittle, Burton, McGraw, Nickens
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 84-169 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BONDS FOR THE
BENEFIT OF T. J. THIELECKE
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of
Roanoke County, Virginia (the "Authority"), has considered the
application of T. J. Thielecke or a company of which T. J.
I
Thielecke will be a principal (the "Company"), 301 Elm Avenue, S.
W., Roanoke, Virginia 24015, requesting the issuance of the
Authority's industrial development revenue bonds in an amount
estimated at $3,250,000.00 (the "Bond") to assist in the
financing of the Company's acquisition, construction and
equipping of a 60,000 - 75,000 square foot neighborhood shopping
I center facility (the "Project") on a nine acre tract located at
i the northerly intersection of Plantation Road and Hollins Road in
Roanoke County, Virginia, and has held a public hearing thereon
on September 24, 1984; and
WHEREAS, Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1954, as amended, provides that the governmental unity having
jurisdiction over the issuer of industrial development bonds and
I
over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of
industrial development bonds is located must approve the issuance
of the bonds; and
WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of
Roanoke County, Virginia (the "County"), the Project is to be
-----
~
..,
166
September 25, 1984
I
located in the County of Roanoke, Virginia, and the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, (the "Board")
constitutes the highest elected governmental officials of the
County; and
WHEREAS, the Authority recommends that the Board of
Supervisors approve the issuance of the Bond; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving
the issuance of the Bond, subject to the terms to be agreed upon,
and a certificate of the public hearing has been filed with the
Board of Supervisors.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Board of Supervisors approves the issuance
of the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, as
required by Section 103(k), to permit the Authority to assist in
the financing of the Project.
2. That the approval of the issuance of the Bond, as
required by Section 103(k), does not constitute an endorsement to
a prospective purchaser of the Bond of the creditworthiness of
the Project or the Company, and, as required by Section 15.1-1380
of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, the Bond shall
provide that neither the County nor the Authority shall be
obligated to pay the Bond or the interest thereon or other costs
incident thereto except from the revenues and moneys pledged
therefor and neither the faith or credit nor the taxing power of
the Commonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged
thereto.
I
I
3. That this Resolution shall take effect immediately
upon its adoption.
Adopted upon motion of Supervisor Burton and the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Supervisors Minter, Brittle, Burton, McGraw, Nickens
NAYS: None
-
~
"..-
161<,
September 25, 1984
RESOLUTION 84-170 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BONDS FOR THE
BENEFIT OF ROANOKE FISH AND OYSTER COMPANY, INC.
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of
I
Roanoke County, Virginia (the "Authority"), has considered the
application of Roanoke Fish and Oyster Company, Inc., (the
"Company"), 103 8th Street, S. E., Roanoke, Virginia 24013
requesting the issuance of the Authority's industrial development
revenue bonds in an amount estimated at $650,000.00 (the "Bond")
to assist in the financing of the Company's acquisition,
construction and equipping of a wholesale seafood distribution
facility (the "Project") at 2.25 acres on the easterly side of
State Secondary Route 601 (Old Hollins Road) (adjacent to Western
State Insulation Company at 6023 Hollins Road) in Roanoke County,
Virginia, and has held a public hearing thereon on August 30,
1984; and
WHEREAS, Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of
I
1954, as amended, provides that the governmental unity having
jurisdiction over the issuer of industrial development bonds and
over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of
industrial development bonds is located must approve the issuance
of the bonds; and
WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of
Roanoke County, Virginia (the "County"), the Project is to be
located in the County of Roanoke, Virginia, and the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, (the "Board")
constitutes the highest elected governmental officials of the
County; and
WHEREAS, the Authority recommends that the Board of
I
Supervisors approve the issuance of the Bond; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving
the issuance of the Bond, subject to the terms to be agreed upon,
and a certificate of the public hearing has been filed with the
Board of Supervisors.
-
~
16(j
-..,
September 25, 1984
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
I
1. That the Board of Supervisors approves the issuance
of the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, as
required by Section 103(k), to permit the Authority to assist in
the financing of the Project.
2. That the approval of the issuance of the Bond, as
required by Section 103(k), does not constitute an endorsement to
a prospective purchaser of the Bond of the creditworthiness of
the Project or the Company, and, as required by Section 15.1-1380
of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, the Bond shall
provide that neither the County nor the Authority shall be
obligated to pay the Bond or the interest thereon or other costs
incident thereto except from the revenues and moneys pledged
therefor and neither the faith or credit nor the taxing power of
I
the Commonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged
thereto.
3. That this Resolution shall take effect immediately
upon its adoption.
Adopted upon motion of Supervisor Burton and the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Supervisors Minter, Brittle, Burton, McGraw, Nickens
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 84-171 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BONDS FOR THE
BENEFIT OF STRAUSS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of
Roanoke County, Virginia (the "Authority"), has considered the
I
application of Strauss Construction Company, requesting the
issuance of the Authority's industrial development revenue bonds
in an amount estimated at $650,000.00 (the "Bond") to assist in
the construction and equipping of an office complex in Roanoke
County, Virginia, and has held a public hearing thereon on
September 24, 1984; and
-----
~
"...
169
~oT"\t-omho't"'?1:\ lQRLl
WHEREAS, Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1954, as amended, provides that the governmental unity having
jurisdiction over the issuer of industrial development bonds and
over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of
industrial development bonds is located must approve the issuance
of the bonds; and
WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of
Roanoke County, Virginia (the "County"), the Project is to be
located in the County of Roanoke, Virginia, and the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, (the "Board")
constitutes the highest elected governmental officials of the
County; and
WHEREAS, the Authority recommends that the Board of
Supervisors approve the issuance of the Bond; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving
the issuance of the Bond, subject to the terms to be agreed upon,
and a certificate of the public hearing has been filed with the
Board of Supervisors.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Board of Supervisors approves the issuance
of the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, as
required by Section 103(k), to permit the Authority to assist in
the financing of the Project.
2. That the approval of the issuance of the Bond, as
required by Section 103(k), does not constitute an endorsement to
a prospective purchaser of the Bond of the creditworthiness of
the project or the Company, and, as required by Section 15.1-1380
of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, the Bond shall
provide that neither the County nor the Authority shall be
obligated to pay the Bond or the interest thereon or other costs
incident thereto except from the revenues and moneys pledged
therefor and neither the faith or credit nor the taxing power of
I
I
I
f---
~
17 ()
~
September 25, 1984
the Commonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged
thereto.
I
3. That this Resolution shall take effect immediately
upon its adoption.
Adopted upon motion of Supervisor Burton and the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Supervisors Minter, Brittle, Burton, McGraw, Nickens
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 84-172 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BONDS FOR THE
BENEFIT OF WILLIAM S. WOODY AND KENNETH S. GUSLER
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of
Roanoke County, Virginia (the "Authority"), has considered the
application of William S. Woody and Kenneth S. Gusler, or their
designee, requesting the issuance of the Authority's industrial
I
development revenue bonds in an amount estimated at $1,400,000.00
(the "Bond") to assist in the financing of the Company's
acquisition and renovation of an office facility in Roanoke
County, Virginia, and has held a public hearing thereon on
September 24, 1984; and
WHEREAS, Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1954, as amended, provides that the governmental unity having
jurisdiction over the issuer of industrial development bonds and
over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of
industrial development bonds is located must approve the issuance
of the bonds; and
WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of
Roanoke County, Virginia (the "County"), the Project is to be
I
located in the County of Roanoke, Virginia, and the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, (the "Board")
constitutes the highest elected governmental officials of the
County; and
WHEREAS, the Authority recommends that the Board of
Supervisors approve the issuance of the Bond; and
-
~
~
171
September 25, 1984
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving
the issuance of the Bond, subject to the terms to be agreed upon,
and a certificate of the public hearing has been filed with the
I
Board of Supervisors.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Board of Supervisors approves the issuance
of the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, as
required by Section 103(k), to permit the Authority to assist in
the financing of the Project.
2. That the approval of the issuance of the Bond, as
required by Section 103(k), does not constitute an endorsement to
a prospective purchaser of the Bond of the creditworthiness of
the Project or the Company, and, as required by Section 15.1-1380
of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, the Bond shall
provide that neither the County nor the Authority shall be
I
obligated to pay the Bond or the interest thereon or other costs
incident thereto except from the revenues and moneys pledged
therefor and neither the faith or credit nor the taxing power of
the Commonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged
thereto.
3. That this Resolution shall take effect immediately
upon its adoption.
Adopted upon motion of Supervisor Burton and the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Supervisors Minter, Brittle, Burton, McGraw, Nickens
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 84-186 APPROVING THE PLAN OF FINANCING
AND THE ISSUANCE OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY BONDS FOR THE BENEFIT OF HOLLINS MANOR
I
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of
Roanoke County, Virginia (the Authority) has considered the
application of Hollins Manor, a Virginia limited partnership (the
Purchaser) for the issuance of the Authority's industrial
-----
~
~
172
September 25, 1984
I
development revenue bond in the amount not to exceed $2,000,000
(the Bond) to assist in the financing of the Purchaser's
acquisition, construction and equipping of a home for adults
health care facility (the Facility) in Roanoke County, Virginia,
and has held a public hearing thereon on August 30, 1984; and
WHEREAS, the Authority has recommended that the Board
of Supervisors (the Board of Supervisors) of Roanoke County,
Virginia (the County), approve the plan of financing for the
Facility to comply with Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1954, as amended; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving
the plan of financing, subject to terms to be agreed upon, and a
record of the public hearing has been filed with the Board of
Supervisors.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. The Board of Supervisors approves the plan of
financing and the issuance of the Bond by the Authority for the
benefit of the Purchaser, to the extent required by Section
103(k), to permit the Authority to assist in the financing of the
Facility.
I
I
2. The approval of the plan of financing and the
issuance of the Bond, as required by Section 103(k), does not
constitute an endorsement of the Bond, the financing viability of
the Facility or the credit worthiness of the Purchaser. Further,
as required by Section 15.1-1380 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as
amended, the Bond shall provide that neither the Commonwealth of
Virginia, the County nor the Authority shall be obligated to pay
the principal of, premium, if any, the interest or supplemental
interest thereon, or other costs incident thereto except from the
revenues and moneys, pledged therefor and other application
security, and neither the faith, credit, nor the taxing power of
~
I~
"...
173
September 25, 1984
the Commonwealth, the County or the Authority shall be pledged
thereto.
3. This resolution shall be in full force and effect
immediately after its passage.
Adopted upon motion of Supervisor Burton and the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Minter, Brittle, Burton, McGraw, Nickens
NAYS: None.
I
IN RE:
REPORT AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
1. Supervisor Minter - No report.
2. Supervisor Brittle - No report.
I
3. Supervisor Burton - Request from Hidden Valley
Junior High School PTA for a raffle permit and waiver of fee.
Supervisor Burton moved that the application be approved and the
fee be waived. The motion was carried by a unanimous voice vote.
4. Supervisor McGraw - No report.
5. Dr. Nickens - No report.
IN RE:
REPORTS OF OFFICERS, DEPARTMENTS AND COMMITTEES
I
2. Department of Development - No report.
3. Department of Fiscal Management - No report.
-
~
174
~
September 25, 1984
4. Department of Personnel - No report.
I
5. Department of Public Facilities - John Hubbard,
Superintendent of the Department of Public Facilities, requested
that the agenda item regarding the easement on Route 897 be held
over as the Department had not received a response from the
property owner.
Mr. Hubbard reported on the financing of the Glenvar
Elementary playing field. A report was provided for the Board of
Supervisors regarding the status of the project at Glenvar and
comparing other fields in the County. In response to the citizen
request at a previous meeting, actual cost expenditures were
provided with a balance of about $6,000 regarding the fencing of
the playing field. At the request of Supervisor Burton, Mr.
Hubbard explained the difference in portable chain link,
permanent chain link fences, and plastic chain link. Supervisor
McGraw moved to install portable fencing at a cost of no more
than $1,675.00. The motion did not carry by the following roll
call vote:
I
AYES:
NAYS:
Supervisors Minter and McGraw
Supervisors Brittle, Burton, and Nickens.
IN RE:
RECESS
Chairman Nickens declared a dinner recess at 5:35 p.m.
I
IN RE:
REGULAR SESSION
Chairman Nickens called the meeting to order at 7:10
p.m. The roll call was taken:
~
~
"...
1,.J~~
- i ;
September 25, 1984
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Harry C. Nickens; Vice Chairman Athena
E. Burton; Supervisors Minter, Brittle, and
I
McGraw
MEMBERS ABSENT:
None.
IN RE:
OPENING CEREMONIES
The invocation was offered by Margaret Tyree, Associate
Minister of Education, Grandin Court Baptist Church. The Pledge
of Allegiance was recited by all present. Chairman Nickens
introduced Pack 229 Boy Scouts sponsored by the Mount Pleasant
Lions Club.
Chairman Nickens read a prepared statement concerning
I
the consolidation of all local governments. This statement
represented the feelings of all Board members rejecting the
proposal that Valley First perform a study on consolidation.
IN RE:
REPORTS OF CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS
IN RE:
REPORTS OF OFFICERS, DEPARTMENTS AND COMMITTEES
5. Public Facilities - John Hubbard, Superintendent of
Department of Public Facilities reported on the Roanoke River
Interceptor. He informed the Board that this particular
resolution is an easement that the County is in the process of
I
condemning and that the County has settled with the property
owner and desire to stop all condemnation proceedings.
Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the prepared resolution to
stop condemnation proceedings.
~
RESOLUTION 84-159 AUTHORIZING SETTLEMENT AND
COMPROMISE OF PENDING LITIGATION, ROANOKE RIVER
~
176
~
September 25, 1984
I
INTERCEPTOR, PROJECT NO. 79-S-1
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That on September 4, 1984, the County Attorney
filed a petition for condemnation against a certain parcel of
real estate owned by Herbert R. and Helen L. Morrison in order to
secure an easement for the Roanoke River Interceptor, Project No.
79-1-S; and
2. That thereafter negotiations between the County and
Mr. and Mrs. Morrison continued and that the parties desire and
mutually agree to resolve this matter without the necessity of
lengthy and costly litigation; and
3. That in compromise of this matter the County agrees
to relocate the sewer easement to an alternate location and in
consideration of the acquisition of this relocated easement to
pay the sum of $1500 to Mr. and Mrs. Morrison; this settlement
and compromise is contingent upon Mr. and Mrs. Morrison executing
the appropriate legal documents. Thereafter the County Attorney
is authorized to dismiss Mr. and Mrs. Morrison and their real
estate from the pending condemnation action.
On motion of Supervisor McGraw and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Minter, Brittle, Burton, McGraw and Nickens
NAYS: None
Mr. Hubbard reported on his meeting with the citizens
in the Montclair Subdivision regarding erosion, siltation control
and storm water management. Mr. Hubbard sent correspondence to
the contractor listing some of the concerns of that area.
I
I
6. County Administrator - Donald R. Flanders, County
Administrator, reported on flood activities in North County. He
advised that Mr. Hubbard, Department of Public Facilities, has
been in touch with the staff of Roanoke City regarding the storm
drainage problem and the two governments are coordinating their
~
I~
"...
¡I
jL'
y~.",¡
J
'"
!
September 25, 1984
activities. Mr. Hubbard is also trying to arrange a meeting date
with the Army Corps of Engineers and the staffs of Roanoke City
and Roanoke County. Mr. Flanders advised that Supervisor Burton
I
has been appointed to serve on the Regional Storm Water
Management Study Committee. Tommy Fuqua, Superintendent of Fire
and Emergency Services will be meeting on October 10, 1984, with
Lowell Gobble, Len Leask and residents of North County at the
Public Safety Facility to discuss methods of personal prevention
of disasters. Mr. Flanders also reported that the Governor has
denied the application submitted by the Board for designation of
a disaster area in North County.
Mr. Flanders also updated the Board on the progress of
the vinton Library. A change order was presented to the Board
for water fountains in the amount of $1,434.00 to be covered by
the insurance carrier. Supervisor Minter moved the prepared
resolution for the approval of the change order be spread in the
I
minutes.
RESOLUTION 84-161 APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
TO THE COUNTY'S CONTRACT WITH Q. M. TOMLINSON,
INCORPORATED, VINTON BRANCH LIBRARY PROJECT
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Change Order No.2 to the County's contract
with Q. M. Tomlinson, Incorporated, Vinton Branch Library
Project, be, and hereby is, approved as follows:
Provide and install new matching
electric water coolers
Add $1,430.46
2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized
I
and directed to execute the necessary documents on behalf of
Roanoke County upon a form approved by the County Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Minter, Brittle, Burton, McGraw and Nickens
~
NAYS: None
~
17 ',,)
(,)
~
September 25, 1984
Mr. Flanders reported that the new furniture should be
delivered during the following week making the tentative date for
I
the opening October 15, 1984.
IN RE:
CONSENT AGENDA
Supervisor Brittle requested that Item 18 be removed
from the consent agenda for further discussion. John Chambliss,
Superintendent of Fiscal Management, requested that Item 2C be
corrected. Upon motion of Supervisor McGraw with the deletion of
Item 18 the following prepared resolution was approved.
RESOLUTION 84-162 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH
ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM F -
CONSENT AGENDA
I
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain section of the agenda of the
Board of Supervisors for September 25, 1984, designated as Item F
- Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as
to each item separately set forth in said section designated
Items 1 through 18, inclusive, as follows:
Approval of minutes of July 24, 1984 meeting.
2. Bid reports:
a. Cathodic Protection System at Belle Haven Tank
b. Bulk Tank Container Service
c. Data Processing Equipment
Resolution
I
3. Accounts paid for June, July, and August, 1984 -
Appropriation Resolution.
-
~
~
179
-----
~
September 25, 1984
4. Appropriation of funds and resolution authorizing a
Buyer position in the Procurement Division of the
Department of Fiscal Management - Resolution.
I
5. Letter from Roanoke Valley Chamber of Commerce
welcoming Timothy W. Gubala to their Leadership
Roanoke Valley Steering Committee.
6. Letters from Congressman Olin and Senator Warner
regarding the National Infrastructure Act, H.R.
5948.
7. Application of Glenvar Youth Boosters for a raffle
permit and for the $25.00 permit fee to be waived.
8. Notice from the Department of Conservation and
I
Economic Development that Roanoke County has been
granted funds to set up a cooperative committee to
be coordinated by the Clean Valley Committee.
9. Letter from H. Benson Dendy, III, Special Assistant
to Governor Robb, stating he has forwarded Roanoke
County's resolution requesting a disaster
declaration to Addison Slayton, Coordinator, Office
of Emergency Services.
10. Letter from Oscar K. Mabry, Deputy Commissioner of
the Department of Highways and Transportation,
I
confirming the additions to the Roanoke County
Secondary System.
11. Thank you letter from Frank A. Boxley, President,
Boxley Construction Company, to Donald R. Flanders
18 U
,.,
September 25, 1984
I
thanking Mr. Flanders for lunch and congratulating
Roanoke County for having such a cooperative
relationship with the contractors.
12.
Letter from Mary F. Parker, City Clerk, attaching a
report of the Water Resources Committee
recommending that the current Sewage Treatment
Plant capacity allocations be maintained.
13. Report from Roanoke County Planning Commission on
their overall mission and goals.
I
14. Appropriation resolution for temporary personnel to
complete Comprehensive Plan in the Department of
Development - Resolution.
15. Memorandum from Sheriff Foster with results of
decal and sobriety checks in Roanoke County.
16. Letter from F. C. Altizer, Resident Engineer,
Department of Highways and Transportation, with
attached approved "Revised Six Year Plan."
17. Letter from Audie and Cheryl Ferris of Willow Creek
thanking Donald R. Flanders and Gary J. Minter for
helping with the roads and cable television in
their area.
I
18. ne~~ef-€feffi-Rea8e~e-Va~~ey-eae~evisie8-ðise~ssi8~
eha88e~-~i8e~~-a8ð-fa~es.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
-----
~
~
181
September 25, 1984
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
the following recorded vote:
I
On motion of Supervisor McGraw with the deletion of Item 18 and
AYES: Supervisors Minter, Brittle, Burton, McGraw, and Nickens.
NAYS: None.
RESOLUTION 84-162.A ACCEPTING CERTAIN
BIDS MADE TO ROANOKE COUNTY SET FORTH AS
FOLLOWS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That those certain bids set forth as follows in the
following words and figures be, and hereby are, accepted, upon
all and singular the terms and conditions of the invitation to
bid, the specifications of the County of Roanoke, the bidder's
proposals, and the provisions of this resolution, to-wit:
a. Contract to furnish and install a Cathodic
I
Protection System at the Belle Haven Reservoir -
Harco Corporation in the amount of $3,780.00.
b. Contract to furnish and service fifty-seven trash
bulk containers at designated County locations -
Cycle Systems, Inc. in the amount of $92,910.72.
c. Purchase of word processing equipment from Lanier
Business Systems in the amount of $29,346.00.
d. Purchase of micro-computer equipment from
ComputerLandjRoanoke in the amount of $7,035.18.
I
e. Purchase of micro-computer equipment from
ComputerLandjRichmond in the amount of $9,269.00.
-----
~
1]6c,-'
September 25, 1984
2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized
and directed to execute the necessary documents on behalf of
I
Roanoke County upon a form approved by the County Attorney; and
3. That all other bids are hereby rejected and the
Clerk is directed to so notify such bidders and express the
County's appreciation for the submission of their bids.
On motion of Supervisor McGraw and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Minter, Brittle, Burton, McGraw and Nickens
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 84-162.B AMENDING RESOLUTION
84-101 ESTABLISHING A CLASSIFICATION AND
PAY PLAN FOR THE 1984-85 FISCAL YEAR
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Resolution No. 84-101 be amended with regard
I
to a new personnel position in the Procurement Division as
follows:
Grade 13
Code
117
Title Dept. No. of Emp.
Buyer Procurement 2 ~
2. That the General Appropriation Resolution of
Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 12, 1984, be, and same
hereby is, amended as follows to become effective September 11,
1984:
INCREASE
DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER (DECREASE)
Class: Expenditures
Fund: General
Department: Procurement
Object: Salaries 03-6-01222-10010 $13,213
FICA-Employers
Contribution 03-6-01222-20010 925
VSRS-Employers
I Contribution 03-6-01222-20020 1,539
HI-Employers
Contribution 03-6-01222-20050 378
LI-Employers
Contribution 03-6-01222-20060 133
Department: Employee Benefits
Object: Reserve for new
positions 03-6-09102-10016 ($16,188)
On motion of Supervisor McGraw and the following recorded vote:
~
~
~18S
.
September 25, 1984
AYES: Supervisors Minter, Brittle, Burton, McGraw and Nickens
RESOLUTION NO.84-162.C
I
NAYS: None
On motion made by Supervisor McGraw, the General
Appropriation Resolution of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted
June 12, 1984, be, and is the same hereby, amended as follows to
become effective September 25, 1984
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NUMBER
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
Class:
Fund:
Department:
Object:
Expenditures
General
Planning and Zoning
Part-time Salaries 03-6-08100-10030
FICA-Employer's
Contribution 03-6-08100-20010
$ 29,384
2,300
Department: Employee Benefits
Reserve for New
positions 03-6-09102-10016
(31,684)
I
Adopted by the following recorded vote.
On motion of Supervisor McGraw and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Minter, Brittle, Burton, McGraw, Nickens.
NAYS: None.
Chairman Nickens requested that the two Board members
who are on the Cablevision Committee report to that committee
that the Board wishes to rescind its .50 cent rate increase. He
also requested that this committee consider returning ESPN and
USA to the basic service. Chairman Nickens also noted concern
that it takes no action on the part of the subscriber to keep
Cable Plus since it is so hard to get through to their exchange.
Supervisor Minter moved to accept Item 18 to the Consent Agenda.
I
This motion was carried by unanimous roll call vote.
IN RE:
PUBLIC HEARINGS
-
Petition of Boone, Boone, & Loeb, Inc
to rezone from Residential RE to Residential
~
lð4
..,
September 25, 1984
District R-5, a parcel of land containing
approximately 10.52 acres and located on Buck
Mountain Road, in the Cave Spring Magisterial
District.
I
APPROVED
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED and ORDERED that at this
meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
held on the 25th day of September, 1984, the said Roanoke County
Zoning Ordinance be, and the same is hereby, amended so as to
reclassify the hereinafter-described property from Residential
Estates District RE and Residential District R-5, which property
is described below and subject to the following conditions:
Situated in the County of Roanoke, State of Virginia:
I
BEGINNING at a point on the southerly side of Starkey Road
(formerly Va. Rt. 119), said point being the northeasterly corner
of Tract 2-B, property of Fralin & Waldron, Inc. (Tax No.
97-01-1-1); thence with the southerly side of Starkey Road, N 710
32' 15" E. 110.00 feet to a point; thence leaving the southerly
side of Starkey Road, and with the southerly side of Buck
Mountain Road, N. 870 02' 15" E. 461.02 feet to another point;
thence continuing with Buck Mountain Road, s. 850 12' 25" E.
455.64 feet to a point; thence with a curved line to the left,
whose radius is 5759.58 feet, and whose chord bearing and
distance is S. 880 24' 10" E. 642.18 feet, an arc distance of
642.18 feet to a point, corner to property of Grover Pate, Jr.,
et al., (Deed Book 956, page 729, Tax No. 97-07-1-16) S. 40 30'
00" W. 290.00 feet to a point; thence N. 850 30' 00" W. 290.00
feet to a point, thence S. 120 32" 00' W. 92.00 feet to a point;
thence N. 760 43' 00" W. 663.00 feet to a point; thence N. 580
00' 00" W. 148 feet to a point; thence S. 720 31' 00" W. 52.00
feet to a point, thence S. 170 28' 00" W. 115.00 feet to a point;
thence S. 810 22' 00" W. 35.00 feet to a point; thence N. 600 22'
00" W. 81.00 feet to a point; thence N. 860 27' 00" W. 97.00 feet
to a point; thence S. 750 17' 00" W. 95.00 feet to a point;
thence S. 510 55' 00" W. 95.00 feet to a point; thence N. 570 57'
OO"W. 122.4 feet to a point on the easterly line of property of
Fralin & Waldron (as aforesaid); thence with the same N. 00 27'
00" W. 225.00 feet to the place of BEGINNING, and containing
10.52 acres, and more particularly shown on a plat prepared by
Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, P.C., dated July 20, 1984.
I
Conditions:
1. Petitioner covenants to develop the subject
property in substantial conformity to the site plan dated July
16, 1984, by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, Inc. and attached to
the Petition as Exhibit "D".
2. There will be only one entrance off Buck Mountain
Road into the subject property.
-
~
~
185
C"--.&--...,hor ')~ lQRLl
3. There will be no interior roads which connect to
adjoining property other than Petitioner's property.
4. An attractively landscaped sign will be located at
I
the main entrance to the subject property on Buck Mountain Road.
5. No residences will front on Buck Mountain Road.
6. No driveways will enter individual dwellings from
Buck Mountain Road.
7. A natural wooded buffered area will be retained
between Buck Mountain Road and the rear of the construction site
for the proposed residences.
AND IT IS ACCORDINGLY SO RESOLVED AND ORDERED.
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Clerk
of this Board shall forthwith certify a copy of this resolution
and order to the Secretary of the Planning Commission of Roanoke
County, Virginia.
The foregoing resolution was adopted on motion of
I
Supervisor Brittle and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Minter, Brittle, Burton, McGraw, Nickens.
NAYS: None.
Petition of Earl Frith to rezone from
Business B-2 to Industrial M-l of a 1.01 acre
tract of land located on the north side of
Brambleton Avenue (3700 block, behind Moore's)
in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District.
APPROVED
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
tract of land, more particularly described below, be rezoned from
B-2 to M-l.
BEGINNING at an iron pin located at the southeast
corner of the property of Thomas R. Watkins and Linda W. Watkins
as shown on survey made by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers and
Surveyors, dated May 15, 1979, a copy of which survey is or
record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
County, Virginia in Deed Book 1132, page 453; thence along the
eastern line of the property of Thomas R. Watkins and Linda W.
Watkins, N. 320 00' E. 150.0 feet to a point located on the line
of the 14.68 acre tract conveyed to Southern Land Company; thence
with same, N. 580 00' E. 330.0 feet to a point; thence along a
new line through the property of Southern Land Company, S. 320
00' E. 110.0 feet to a point located at the northeast corner of
the property of Charles R. Simpson and Naomi G. Simpson as shown
I
-
~
186
..,
September 25, 1984
I
on plat made by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers & Surveyors, dated
June 18, 1980, of record in the Clerk's office aforesaid in Deed
Book 1147, page 748; thence with the property of Charles R.
Simpson and Naomi G. Simpson, S. 580 00' W. 130.0 feet to a
point; thence S. 320 00' E 40.0 feet to a point located on the
line of the property described as Moore's Building Supply; thence
with same, S. 580 00' W. 200.0 feet to the place of BEGINNING.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the County Planner and that he be and hereby is
directed to reflect that change on the official zoning maps of
the County.
ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Burton and the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Minter, Burton, Brittle, McGraw, and Nickens.
NAYS: None.
I
petition of Patrick and Sue Dennis
for a Special Exception Permit to place a
mobile home on a 1.0 acre tract located on
the east side of Reid Road approximately .75
miles from the intersection of State Route 611
and Reid Road in the Hollins Magisterial
District. Held over from September 11, 1984
APPROVED
Mr. Patrick Dennis appeared before the board. There
being no opposition, Supervisor Minter moved for approval of the
Special Exception Permit. The motion was carried by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Supervisors Minter, Burton, Brittle, McGraw, and Nickens.
NAYS: None.
IN RE: CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
C. John Renick appeared before the Board on behalf of
Wanda Kettleson to request that the Board reconsider an earlier
I
decision to deny a previous rezoning request. Mr. Renick passed
out a petition for rehearing, a copy of the staff report prepared
by the Planning and Development Departments, a copy of the
Proffer of Conditions, a survey of the property, and a copy of a
petition signed by the surrounding property owners. Supervisor
Minter moved to reconsider Mrs. Kettleson's request. The motion
-
,~
"...
o~
1 ð ~
September 25, 1984
was carried by a unanimous roll vote. Minter moved to
readvertise the matter for public hearing. The motion carried by
Mrs. Anita Looney, 7340 Barrens Road, NW, Roanoke,
I
a unanimous voice vote.
Virginia, 24019, spoke to the Board concerning the drainage
across her property and the sewer backups experienced in her
neighborhood. Mrs. Looney was advised of a meeting on October
10, 1984, at the firestation in her neighborhood.
IN RE:
APPOINTMENTS
Supervisor McGraw moved to appoint Mr. Tom Isenhart,
5313 Cherokee Hills Drive, Salem, Virginia, to the Industrial
Development Authority. The motion carried by a unanimous voice
vote.
Supervisor McGraw moved to appoint Murray K. White,
I
Route 3, Salem, Virginia, 24153, to the League of Older Americans
Advisory Council. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
Supervisor Brittle reminded the Board that appointments
needed to be made to the Management Advisory Council at the
October 9, 1984 meeting.
IN RE:
WORK SESSION
County Attorney, Paul Mahoney, discussed the
Recodification of the Roanoke County Code with the Board. Mr.
Mahoney is to have his temporary staff go through all amendments
by agreement with the Board.
I
IN RE:
EXECUTIVE SESSION
-----
I
~
188
September 25, 1984
Supervisor Minter moved to go into Executive Session
pursuant to the Code of Virginia, Section 2.1-334(a) (1), (2),
I
(4), and (6) at 10:15 p.m.
IN RE:
OPEN SESSION
Supervisor McGraw moved to return to Open Session at
11:45 p.m.
IN RE:
ADJOURNMENT
At 11:50 p.m. Supervisor Brittle moved to adjourn. The
motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
I
c~'kL
I