12/18/1984 - Regular
~
32~
I
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Center
3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24015
December 18, 1984
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County
Administration Center, this being the third Tuesday and the
second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of December,
1984.
IN RE:
CALL TO ORDER
Vice-Chairman Burton called the meeting to order at
I
3:10 p.m. The roll call was taken.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Vice-Chairman Athena E. Burton, Supervisors
Gary J. Minter, Steven A. McGraw, Alan H.
Brittle
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Supervisor Harry C. Nickens
IN RE:
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Supervisor McGraw moved to go into Executive Session
pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a), (1), (2), (4), and
(6). The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. Chairman
Harry C. Nickens arrived during Executive Session.
I
IN RE:
OPEN SESSION
Supervisor Brittle moved to return to Open Session at
4:00 p.m. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
Work Session - Fire Hydrant Policy - John Hubbard,
Superintendent of Public Facilities, and Tom Fuqua, Coordinator
of Fire and Emergency Services presented a report to the Board of
-----
~
~
~}~9
t,-' ~.
December 18, 1984
Supervisors regarding the placement of fire hydrants. For
insurance purposes, all fire hydrants must be within 1,000 feet
of all structures in residential areas and greater distances than
I
600 feet require relay pumping by the Fire Department. Mr. Fuqua
and Mr. Hubbard suggested an incentive program for the
installation of fire hydrants. They suggested having funds from
their budget or capital improvement fund set aside each year to
enable the County to participate in a 50/50 share program with
communities to place fire hydrants. Mr. Hubbard and Mr. Fuqua
also suggested a policy on new development whereas developers
will be required to furnish the needed water flow and provide the
right size main. Supervisor Burton requested the staff to report
back to the Board on including this suggestion into the fire
ordinance. Supervisor Minter suggested color coding buildings
that contain hazardous materials. Mr. Fuqua reported that any
I
organization or individual storing such materials are required to
have a permit. The Board concurred with all recommendations of
the staff. Staff is to start evaluations. County Administrator,
Donald R. Flanders, reported that he would like to have a work
session on January 8, 1985, to discuss using Capital funds to
allocate funds for fire hydrants and color coding.
Work Session - Carvin Creek Flood Control Program -
John Hubbard, Superintendent of Public Facilities, reported on
this program. The Army Corps of Engineers reported that this
area would qualify for a study under their program. A letter or
resolution is required to get a Recon study started. The study
will be done at no cost. Supervisor Minter moved to request a
regarding this study. Supervisor Nickens asked if Roanoke County
I
Recon report as soon as possible and to have a resolution spread
should hire their own engineering firm to parallel the Army Corps
of Engineers' study. Mr. Hubbard felt that this would not be
necessary.
-----
L
..,
330
December 18, 1984
Report on Progress of Reassessment Project and Need to
Extend Completion Date - John Chambliss, Superintendent of Fiscal
I Management, updated the Board on the 1985 Reassessment Program.
The County Assessor and staff have completed the review of all
property in Roanoke County for the property values and have made
the first assignment of values to properties. There are,
however, a few commercial properties and close up items that are
still being reviewed for accuracy and being loaded into the
computer system. The appraisal staff is currently reviewing the
new construction during the last six months of 1984. Mr.
Chambliss requested an extension for up to ninety (90) days. He
anticipates that all field work, including building permits, will
be completed by January 15, 1985, and notices will be sent to
property owners approximately January 31, 1985. The month of
I
February has been set aside for informal hearings. The Board of
Equalization will convene their hearings for formal appeals in
mid-March and citizens will have until June 30, 1985, to resolve
any disputes in values of property. Supervisor McGraw moved for
approval of the prepared resolution.
RESOLUTION 84-219 AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY
ATTORNEY TO PETITION THE CIRCUIT COURT
FOR AN EXTENSION OF THE DUE DATE OF THE
COMPLETION OF THE 1984 REASSESSMENT
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the County Attorney is hereby authorized and
directed to petition the Circuit Court of Roanoke County for an
extension of time for completing the reassessment for a period of
I
three months from December 31, 1984 until March 31, 1985 pursuant
to Section 58-792 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended.
On motion of Supervisor McGraw and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, McGraw, Minter, and Nickens.
NAYS: None.
~
~
,...-
331
December 18, 1984
IN RE:
REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
Supervisor Burton - No Report.
I
Supervisor Brittle - Presented a request from the
Clearbrook PTA for a Bingo/Raffle permit. Mr. Brittle moved
that the request for the permit be accepted and the $25 fee be
returned to the Clearbrook PTA. The motion carried by a
unanimous voice vote.
Supervisor Brittle also presented a prepared resolution
relating to the advancement of the hiring date of the Bailiff's
position for the new Courthouse from February 1, 1985 to January
1, 1985. Supervisor Brittle moved for approval of the prepared
resolution.
RESOLUTION 84-220 AMENDING RESOLUTION
84-101 APPROVING THE CLASSIFICATION PLAN
FOR THE 1984-85 FISCAL YEAR
I
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Resolution 84-101 approving the classification
plan for the 1984-85 fiscal year be amended to read and provide
as follows:
Grade 17
Code - Title Dept. No. Emp.
820 Court Bailiff Sheriff/Policing &
Investigation 10 9
Grade 19
-
Code Title Dept. No. Emp.
-
824 Deputy Sheriff Sergeant Sheriff/Policing &
Investigation 10 ~:I:
2. That this amendment shall take effect January 1,
I
1985.
On motion of Supervisor Brittle and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens.
NAYS: None
-
~
1-
..,
December 18, 1984
332
Supervisor Brittle also reported that Roanoke County
has been identified by the Department of Energy as a possible
site to locate nuclear dumps and moved that a resolution be
I
prepared and placed in the minutes of the January 8, 1985 Board
of Supervisors meeting to be forwarded to the Department of
Energy opposing the placement of that dump. The motion carried
by a unanimous voice vote.
Supervisor Brittle asked Mr. Hubbard about leaf
collection throughout the County. Mr. Hubbard reported that
leaves will be collected through the first or second week of
January, 1985.
Supervisor McGraw - No Report.
Supervisor Minter - No Report.
Supervisor Nickens - No Report.
I
IN RE:
CONSENT AGENDA
County Administrator, Donald R. Flanders, requested
that the resolution concerning Item 25 on the Consent Agenda be
changed to read "or his designee" on item 1 on first line.
Chairman Nickens requested a work session on Item 10 on the
Consent Agenda, Audit for Fiscal Year ending June 30, 1984.
Supervisor Brittle moved for approval of the Consent Agenda with
the above listed changes.
RESOLUTION NO. 84-223 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH
ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM F -
CONSENT AGENDA
I
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain section of the agenda of the
Board of Supervisors for December 18, 1984, designated as Item F
- Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as
~
~
,...-
00'3'. M
~ ~ ~
December 18, 1984
to each item separately set forth in said section designated
Items 1 through 25, inclusive, as follows:
1.
Minutes of Meeting - September 11, 1984.
I
2.
Memorandum from George E. Calvert, Jr., State
Administrator, Industrial Bond Program dated
November 26, 1984 concerning year-end close-out
of industrial development bonds.
3. Letter from Oscar K. Mabry, Department of
Highways and Transportation dated November 20,
1984 pertaining to Secondary System Additions to
Roanoke County.
4. Letter dated November 26, 1984 from J. T.
Shropshire, Compensation Board to Sheriff o. S.
Foster acknowledging receipt of Order of
Dismissal for 1984/85 Statutory Appeal.
5. Letter dated December 3, 1984 from Jack Smith,
Roanoke Valley Chamber of Commerce thanking
Roanoke County for their assistance on Sandlot
Super Bowl #1.
6. Approval of Change Order No. 4 for the Vinton
Branch Library.
- Resolution.
7.
Report on revenues from surplus auction.
I
8.
Letter dated December 5, 1984 from John V.
Jackson, Department of Conservation & Economic
Development concerning funding for the Clean
Valley Committee. Highway road submittal to
9. Highway road submittal to Virginia Department of
Highways and Transportation of Canter Drive and
Cromwell Court in the Canterbury subdivision in
the Windsor Hills Magisterial District.
- Order.
10. Transmittal of audit for fiscal year ending June
30, 1984.
11. Accounts paid for November 1984.
12. Financial statements for November 1984.
13. Bid Reports for the following:
a. Paving of Bent Mountain Refuse Center.
b. Radio equipment for the fire department.
c. furnishing for Mt. Pleasant library.
- Resolution.
I
14. Memorandum dated November 28, 1984 from Jill M.
Pope, Virginia Association of Counties concerning
legislative meetings and public hearings on
Antitrust.
15. Raffle Permit for the Loyal Order of Moose, No.
284. Fee is paid.
-
~
~
December 18, 1984
334
16. Audit Report for the Clerk of Circuit Court from
1/1/82 to 6/30/82 and years ending June 30, 1983
and 1984.
I 17.
18.
19.
20.
Approval of payment for easements in Big Hill
water line.
- Resolution.
Status report on closing of Knowles Road to
through truck traffic.
..
Status report on Hollins Park Grant.
Letter dated November 9, 1984 froITl Senator Paul
Trible regarding water resource problem in the
Roanoke River Basin.
21. Letter dated December 5, 1984 from Becky Shaffer,
Virginia Skyline Girl Scout Council regarding the
flag raising at the Roanoke County Administration
Center.
22. Letter dated December 5, 1984 from Fred Altizer,
Jr., Department of Highways and Transportation
concerning traffic problems on View Avenue and
culverts at Carvin Creek.
I
23. Letter dated November 29, 1984 from State Senator
Dudley J. Emick, Jr. pertaining to the Joint
Legislative meeting on December 13, 1984.
24. Report on cost-sharing agreement for the
reconstruction of Lantern Drive - Resolution.
25. Authorization for acquisition of 206.09 acres
owned by J. Armstrong Cross, et al., for $600,000
- Resolution.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Brittle and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens.
NAYS: None
I
RESOLUTION 84-223.A APPROVING CHANGE
ORDER NO. 4 TO THE COUNTY'S CONTRACT WITH
Q. M. TOMLINSON, INCORPORATED FOR
RECONSTRUCTION OF THE VINTON BRANCH
LIBRARY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
-----
~
"...-
Q3~
.J ~ ~)
December 18, 1984
1. That Change Order No.4 to the County's contract
with Q. M. Tomlinson, Incorporated for reconstruction of the
vinton Branch Library be, and hereby is, approved as set out
below:
I
1.
2.
3.
4.
Repair and re-insulate damaged water pipes
Furnish and install faucet in workroom sink
Furnish and install faucet in men's toilet
Unstop and repair clogged roof drains
2. That the County Administrator is
ADD $611.75
ADD 105.25
ADD 112.50
ADD 330.50
TOTAL $1160.00
hereby authorized
and directed to execute Change Order No. 4 on behalf of Roanoke
County.
On motion of Supervisor Burton and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 84-223.B ACCEPTING CERTAIN
BIDS MADE TO ROANOKE COUNTY SET FORTH AS
FOLLOWS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
I
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That those certain bids set forth as follows in the
following words and figures be, and hereby are, accepted, upon
all and singular the terms and conditions of the invitation to
bid, the specifications of the County of Roanoke, the bidder's
proposals, and the provisions of this resolution, to-wit:
A. Surface treating of the parking lot and entrance
road at the Bent Mountain Refuse Site - awarded to
Roanoke Valley Paving, Inc. for an amount not to
exceed $2,625.08.
B. Various radio equipment for use by various fire
departments - awarded to Motorola C & E, Inc. for an
amount not to exceed $17,675.00.
C. Purchase contract for oak wood shelving delivered
and installed at the Mount Pleasant Public Library -
awarded to J. H. Pence Company for an amount not to
exceed $5,792.00.
I
2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized
and directed to execute the necessary documents on behalf of
Roanoke County upon a form approved by the County Attorney; and
-
~
December 18, 1984
336
l
I
I
I
3. That all other bids are hereby rejected and the
Clerk is directed to so notify such bidders and express the
I
County's appreciation for the submission of their bids.
On motion of Supervisor Burton and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens.
NAYS: None.
RESOLUTION 84-223.C AUTHORIZING THE
ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN WATER LINE AND
ACCESS ROAD EASEMENTS FOR THE BIG HILL
WATER LINE PROJECT
WHEREAS, it is the intention of Roanoke County to
acquire certain real estate and easements in connection with the
construction of a water supply system including a water tank,
booster station, water lines, and access easements in that
portion of the County known as "Big Hill"; and
I
WHEREAS, this acquisition is part of the County
response to a serious environmental problem involving Matthews
Electroplating and a portion of this solution is being funded by
means of the Federal Environmental Protection Agency's "Super
Fund" program; and
WHEREAS, the County staff has successfully negotiated a
fair and reasonable price for the acquisition of easements for
the construction of said water lines and for an access road.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County authorizes the County Administrator to execute
such documents and take such steps necessary in order to acquire
certain water line and access road easements from the following
individuals and for the amounts indicated:
I
John Willis Bryant, Sr. and Gladys R. Bryant - $2,500.00
John Willis Bryant, Jr. and Frances Rider Bryant - $1,289.00.
On motion of Supervisor Burton and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens.
NAYS: None
-----
~
~
337
December 18, 1984
RESOLUTION 84-223.D AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION OF A COST-SHARING AGREEMENT FOR
CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS TO LANTERN DRIVE
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
I
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the County Administrator is authorized to
execute an agreement with Fralin & Waldron for the reconstruction
of Lantern Drive from Lamplighter Drive to Twilight Drive; the
purpose of this agreement is to complete certain road
improvements for submittal to and acceptance by the Virginia
Department of Highways and Transportation as part of the state's
secondary road system; and
2. That the total cost of this project shall be
$13,006; 70% of which cost shall be paid by the County and 30% of
which cost shall be paid by Fralin & Waldron. The County's share
shall be $9,104.20; and
3. This agreement shall be upon a form to be approved
I
by the County Attorney; and
4. That money is available in Road Approvement Account
#16-6-60181-00000.
On motion of Supervisor Burton and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens.
NAYS: None.
RESOLUTION 84-223.E AUTHORIZING THE
ACQUISITION OF 206.09 ACRES OF REAL
ESTATE
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the County Administrator or his designee is
I
authorized to execute such documents necessary to acquire
ownership of approximately 206.09 acres of real estate owned by
J. Armstrong Cross, et al., for a purchase price of $600,000; and
2. That excepted from this property is a 75 foot strip
on the southwestern boundary of this property; however, the
-
~
~
338
December 18, 1984
County shall acquire easement rights for purposes of access and
utilities across and along said 75 foot strip; and
I
3. That the purchase price shall be paid as follows:
50% shall be paid at closing which shall occur on or before
December 31, 1984, and the remaining 50% shall be paid on January
2, 1985; and
4. That the General Appropriation Resolution of
Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 12, 1984, be, and same
hereby is, amended as follows to become effective December 18,
1984:
DESCRIPTION
Class:
Fund:
Object:
I
Fund:
Object:
Class:
Fund:
Object:
ACCOUNT NUMBER
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
Expenditure
Capital
Property
Acquisitiion
16-6-60177-00000
$600,000
General
Transfer to
Capital Fund
Unappropriated
Balance
03-6-09316-90016
$600,000
($600,000)
03-6-99999-99999
Revenues
Capital
Transfer from
General Fund
16-5-51030-000000
$600,000
On motion of Supervisor Burton and the following recorded vote
with the addition "or his designee" to paragraph 1:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens.
NAYS: None
IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION
I
Supervisor Brittle moved to return to Executive Session
pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 (a), (1), (2),
(4), and (6). The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
IN RE:
OPEN SESSION
Supervisor McGraw moved to return to Open Session at
5:35 p.m. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
f----
~
".-
339
December 18, 1984
IN RE:
RECESS
Chairman Nickens called for a dinner recess at 5:40
I
p.m.
IN RE:
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Nickens called the meeting to order at 7:06
p.m. The roll call was taken.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chairman Harry C. Nickens; Vice-Chairman
Athena E. Burton; Supervisors Alan H. Brittle
Steven A. McGraw, and Gary J. Minter
MEMBERS ABSENT:
None
IN RE:
OPENING CEREMONIES
The invocation was given by Chairman Harry C. Nickens.
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present.
IN RE:
REPORTS OF OFFICERS, DEPARTMENTS, AND COMMITTEES
I
1. Industrial Development Authority - Mr. Robert Glenn
was present to answer any of the questions the Board may have
about requests for approval of Industrial Development bonds. Ten
of the eleven requests were made by George Preas for a office
development on Starkey Road. This project is to be closed by the
end of the year with the approval of the Board. The eleventh
request is made by Mr. Gallagher, whose property has been
rezoned. Mr. Gallagher's request provides for final approval by
the County Administrator since his public hearing will not be
held until Friday before the Industrial Development Authority.
Supervisor Minter moved for approval of each of the prepared
resolutions.
I
RESOLUTION 84-237 APPROVING THE ISSUANCE
OF THE BOND OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF STEPHEN
MUSSELWHITE
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Authority"), has considered the
-----
~
~
December 18, 1984
~40
application of Stephen Musselwhite (the "Company"), 2706 Ogden
Road, Roanoke, Virginia 24014, requesting the issuance of the
I
Authority's industrial development revenue bond in an amount
estimated at $395,000 (the "Bond") to assist in the financing of
the Companys' acquisition, construction and equipping of an
office facility (the "Project") on the southeast side of Starkey
Road across from Tanglewood Square Shopping Center, in Tanglewood
Professional Center in Roanoke County, Virginia, and has held a
public hearing thereon on December 12, 1984; and
WHEREAS, Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1954, as amended, provides that the governmental unit having
jurisdiction over the issuer of industrial development bonds and
over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of
industrial development bonds is located must approve the issuance
of the bonds; and
I
WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of
the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County"), the Project is to be
located in the County and the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Board") constitutes the highest
elected governmental officials of the County; and
WHEREAS, the Authority recommends that the Board of
Supervisors approve the issuance of the Bond; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving
the issuance of the Bond, subject to the terms to be agreed upon,
and a certificate of the public hearing has been filed with the
Board.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
I
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. The Board of Supervisors approves the issuance of
the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, as
required by Section 103(k), to permit the Authority to assist in
the financing of the Project.
~
~
~
~41
December 18, 1984
2. The approval of the issuance of the Bond, as
required by Section 103(k), does not constitute an endorsement to
the Project or the Company, and, as required by Section 15.1-1380
I
a prospective purchaser of the Bond of the creditworthiness of
of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the Bond shall provide
that neither the County nor the Authority shall be obligated to
pay the Bond or the interest thereon or other costs incident
thereto except from the revenues and moneys pledged therefor and
neither the faith or credit nor the taxing power of the
Commonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged
thereto.
3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon
its adoption.
On motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Minter, McGraw, Burton, Brittle, and Nickens
NAYS: None
I
RESOLUTION 84-238 APPROVING THE ISSUANCE
OF THE BOND OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF WILLIAM P.
SWANN
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Authority"), has considered the
application of William P. Swann (the "Company"), 4502 Starkey
Road, Roanoke, Virginia 24014, requesting the issuance of the
Authority's industrial development revenue bond in an amount
estimated at $143,000 (the "Bond") to assist in the financing of
the Companys' acquisition, construction and equipping of an
office facility (the "Project") on the southeast side of Starkey
Road across from the Tanglewood Square Shopping Center, in
I
Tanglewood Professional Center in Roanoke County, Virginia, and
has held a public hearing thereon on December 12, 1984; and
WHEREAS, Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1954, as amended, provides that the governmental unit having
jurisdiction over the issuer of industrial development bonds and
----
over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of
~
~
34,2
December 18, 1984
I
industrial development bonds is located must approve the issuance
of the bonds; and
WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of
the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County"), the Project is to be
located in the County and the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Board") constitutes the highest
elected governmental officials of the County; and
WHEREAS, the Authority recommends that the Board of
Supervisors approve the issuance of the Bond; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving
the issuance of the Bond, subject to the terms to be agreed upon,
and a certificate of the public hearing has been filed with the
Board.
I
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. The Board of Supervisors approves the issuance of
the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, as
required by Section 103(k), to permit the Authority to assist in
the financing of the Project.
2. The approval of the issuance of the Bond, as
required by Section 103(k), does not constitute an endorsement to
a prospective purchaser of the Bond of the creditworthiness of
the Project or the Company, and, as required by Section 15.1-1380
of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the Bond shall provide
that neither the County nor the Authority shall be obligated to
pay the Bond or the interest thereon or other costs incident
I
thereto except from the revenues and moneys pledged therefor and
neither the faith or credit nor the taxing power of the
~ommonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged
~hereto.
3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon
~ts adoption.
Dn motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote:
~
~
~
343
December 18, 1984
AYES: Supervisors Minter, McGraw, Burton, Brittle, and Nickens
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 84-239 APPROVING THE ISSUANCE
OF THE BOND OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF SHERRILL W.
STOCKTON
I
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Authority"), has considered the
application of Sherrill W. Stockton (the "Company"), 4502 Starkey
Road, Roanoke, Virginia 24014, requesting the issuance of the
Authority's industrial development revenue bond in an amount
estimated at $260,000 (the "Bond") to assist in the financing of
the Companys' acquisition, construction and equipping of an
office facility (the "Project") on the southeast side of Starkey
Road across from Tanglewood Square Shopping Center, in Tanglewood
Professional Center in Roanoke County, Virginia, and has held a
WHEREAS, Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of
I
public hearing thereon on December 12, 1984; and
1954, as amended, provides that the governmental unit having
jurisdiction over the issuer of industrial development bonds and
over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of
industrial development bonds is located must approve the issuance
of the bonds; and
WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of
the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County"), the Project is to be
located in the County and the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Board") constitutes the highest
elected governmental officials of the County; and
WHEREAS, the Authority recommends that the Board of
I
Supervisors approve the issuance of the Bond; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving
the issuance of the Bond, subject to the terms to be agreed upon,
and a certificate of the public hearing has been filed with the
Board.
-----
~
~
344
0, ..,hør lR. lQOA
County, Virginia, as follows:
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke I
I
I
1. The Board of Supervisors approves the issuance of
the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, as
required by Section 103(k), to permit the Authority to assist in
the financing of the Project.
2. The approval of the issuance of the Bond, as
required by Section 103(k), does not constitute an endorsement to
a prospective purchaser of the Bond of the creditworthiness of
the Project or the Company, and, as required by Section 15.1-1380
of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the Bond shall provide
that neither the County nor the Authority shall be obligated to
pay the Bond or the interest thereon or other costs incident
I
thereto except from the revenues and moneys pledged therefor and
neither the faith or credit nor the taxing power of the
Commonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged
thereto.
3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon
its adoption.
On motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote:
~YES: Supervisors Minter, McGraw, Burton, Brittle, and Nickens
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 84-240 APPROVING THE ISSUANCE
OF THE BOND OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF ROBERT S.
KIDDER
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the
~ounty of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Authority"), has considered the
I
pplication of Robert S. Kidder (the "Company"), 4502 Starkey
oad, Roanoke, Virginia 24014, requesting the issuance of the
uthority's industrial development revenue bond in an amount
stimated at $135,000 (the "Bond") to assist in the financing of
he Companys' acquisition, construction and equipping of an
(ffice facility (the "Project") on the southeast side of Starkey
J oad across from Tanglewood Square Shopping Center, in Tanglewood
-----
~
~
::\ 4 ~)
r..
,-
lQ lQQ,4
Professional Center in Roanoke County, Virginia, and has held a
public hearing thereon on December 12, 1984; and
WHEREAS, Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1954, as amended, provides that the governmental unit having
jurisdiction over the issuer of industrial development bonds and
over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of
industrial development bonds is located must approve the issuance
of the bonds; and
WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of
the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County"), the Project is to be
located in the County and the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Board") constitutes the highest
elected governmental officials of the County; and
WHEREAS, the Authority recommends that the Board of
Supervisors approve the issuance of the Bond; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving
the issuance of the Bond, subject to the terms to be agreed upon,
and a certificate of the public hearing has been filed with the
Board.
I
I
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. The Board of Supervisors approves the issuance of
the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, as
required by Section 103(k), to permit the Authority to assist in
the financing of the Project.
2. The approval of the issuance of the Bond, as
required by Section 103(k), does not constitute an endorsement to
a prospective purchaser of the Bond of the creditworthiness of
the Project or the Company, and, as required by Section 15.1-1380
of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the Bond shall provide
I
that neither the County nor the Authority shall be obligated to
pay the Bond or the interest thereon or other costs incident
thereto except from the revenues and moneys pledged therefor and
-----
~
~
December 18, 1984
346
neither the faith or credit nor the taxing power of the
Commonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged
I
thereto.
3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon
its adoption.
On motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Minter, McGraw, Burton, Brittle, and Nickens
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 84-241 APPROVING THE ISSUANCE
OF THE BOND OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF W. H.
FRAZIER, III
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Authority"), has considered the
application of W. H. Fraizer (the "Company"), 4502 Starkey Road,
Roanoke, Virginia 24014, requesting the issuance of the
I
Authority's industrial development revenue bond in an amount
estimated at $150,000 (the "Bond") to assist in the financing of
the Companys' acquisition, construction and equipping of an
office facility (the "Project") on the southeast side of Starkey
Road across from Tanglewood Square Shopping Center, in Tanglewood
Professional Center in Roanoke County, Virginia, and has held a
public hearing thereon on December 12, 1984; and
WHEREAS, Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1954, as amended, provides that the governmental unit having
jurisdiction over the issuer of industrial development bonds and
over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of
industrial development bonds is located must approve the issuance
I
of the bonds; and
WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of
the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County"), the Project is to be
located in the County and the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Board") constitutes the highest
elected governmental officials of the County; and
-----
~
"..-
34'i1
December 18, 1984
WHEREAS, the Authority recommends that the Board of
Supervisors approve the issuance of the Bond; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving
the issuance of the Bond, subject to the terms to be agreed upon,
I
and a certificate of the public hearing has been filed with the
Board.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. The Board of Supervisors approves the issuance of
the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, as
required by Section 103(k), to permit the Authority to assist in
the financing of the Project.
2. The approval of the issuance of the Bond, as
required by Section 103(k), does not constitute an endorsement tc
a prospective purchaser of the Bond of the creditworthiness of
the Project or the Company, and, as required by Section 15.1-1380
I
of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the Bond shall provide
that neither the County nor the Authority shall be obligated to
pay the Bond or the interest thereon or other costs incident
thereto except from the revenues and moneys pledged therefor and
neither the faith or credit nor the taxing power of the
Commonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged
thereto.
3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon
its adoption.
On motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Minter, McGraw, Burton, Brittle, and Nickens
RESOLUTION 84-242 APPROVING THE ISSUANCE
OF THE BOND OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF GEORGE R.
PREAS
I
NAYS: None
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Authority"), has considered the
----
application of George R. Preas (the "Developer") P. O. Box 4338,
~
~
348
December 18, 1984
Roanoke, Virginia 24015, requesting the issuance of the
Authority's industrial development revenue bond in an amount
I
estimated at $150,000 (the "Bond") to assist in the financing of
the Companys' acquisition, construction and equipping of an
office facility (the "Project") on the southeast side of Starkey
Road across from Tanglewood Professional Center in Roanoke
County, Virginia, and has held a public hearing thereon on
December 12, 1984; and
WHEREAS, Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1954, as amended, provides that the governmental unit having
jurisdiction over the issuer of industrial development bonds and
over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of
industrial development bonds is located must approve the issuance
of the bonds; and
I
WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of
the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County"), the Project is to be
located in the County and the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Board") constitutes the highest
elected governmental officials of the County; and
WHEREAS, the Authority recommends that the Board of
Supervisors approve the issuance of the Bond; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving
the issuance of the Bond, subject to the terms to be agreed upon,
and a certificate of the public hearing has been filed with the
Board.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
I
1. The Board of Supervisors approves the issuance of
the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, as
required by Section 103(k), to permit the Authority to assist in
the financing of the Project.
2. The approval of the issuance of the Bond, as
required by Section 103(k), does not constitute an endorsement to
I
I
~
I
J
"..-
349
December 18, 1984
a prospective purchaser of the Bond of the creditworthiness of
the Project or the Company, and, as required by Section 15.1-1380
of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the Bond shall provide
I
that neither the County nor the Authority shall be obligated to
pay the Bond or the interest thereon or other costs incident
thereto except from the revenues and moneys pledged therefor and
neither the faith or credit nor the taxing power of the
Commonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged
thereto.
3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon
its adoption.
On motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Minter, McGraw, Burton, Brittle, and Nickens
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 84-243 APPROVING THE ISSUANCE
OF THE BOND OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF CHRIS G.
SCORDAS AND ROBERT V. KINNEY
I
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Authority"), has considered the
application of Chris G. Scordas and Robert V. Kinney, as
partners, 4502 Starkey Road, Roanoke, Virginia 24014, requesting
the issuance of the Authority's industrial development revenue
bond in an amount estimated at $255,000 (the "Bond") to assist in
the financing of the Companys' acquisition, construction and
equipping of an office facility (the "Project") on the southeast
side of Starkey Road across from Tanglewood Square Shopping
Center, in Tanglewood Professional Center in Roanoke County,
Virginia, and has held a public hearing thereon on December 12,
1984; and
I
WHEREAS, Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1954, as amended, provides that the governmental unit having
jurisdiction over the issuer of industrial development bonds and
over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of
-----
~
..,
December 18, 1984
350
industrial development bonds is located must approve the issuance
of the bonds; and
I
WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of
the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County"), the Project is to be
located in the County and the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Board") constitutes the highest
elected governmental officials of the County; and
WHEREAS, the Authority recommends that the Board of
Supervisors approve the issuance of the Bond; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving
the issuance of the Bond, subject to the terms to be agreed upon,
and a certificate of the public hearing has been filed with the
Board.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
I
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. The Board of Supervisors approves the issuance of
the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, as
required by Section 103(k), to permit the Authority to assist in
the financing of the Project.
2. The approval of the issuance of the Bond, as
required by Section 103(k), does not constitute an endorsement to
a prospective purchaser of the Bond of the creditworthiness of
the Project or the Company, and, as required by Section 15.1-1380
of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the Bond shall provide
that neither the County nor the Authority shall be obligated to
pay the Bond or the interest thereon or other costs incident
I
thereto except from the revenues and moneys pledged therefor and
neither the faith or credit nor the taxing power of the
Commonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged
thereto.
3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon
its adoption.
On motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote:
I--
~
~
~-~ ~) 1
...
December 18, 1984
AYES: Supervisors Minter, McGraw, Burton, Brittle, and Nickens
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 84-244 APPROVING THE ISSUANCE
OF THE BOND OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF MICHAEL A.
ABBOTT, JOSEPH BLACKSTOCK, WALTER A.
GOLD, MILES J. NEWMAN, G. BRUCE NUSSBAUM,
AND RONALD L. BLUM
I
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Authority"), has considered the
application of Michael A. Abbott, Joseph Blackstock, Walter A.
Gold, Miles J. Newman, G. Bruce Nussbaum, and Ronald L. Blum, as
partners, (the "Company"), 1940 Braeburn Drive, Salem, Virginia
24153, requesting the issuance of the Authority's industrial
development revenue bond in an amount estimated at $300,000 (the
"Bond") to assist in the financing of the Companys' acquisition,
construction and equipping of an office facility (the "Project")
Square Shopping Center in Tanglewood Professional Center in
I
on the southeast side of Starkey Road across from Tanglewood
Roanoke County, Virginia, and has held a public hearing thereon
on December 12, 1984; and
WHEREAS, Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1954, as amended, provides that the governmental unit having
jurisdiction over the issuer of industrial development bonds and
over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of
industrial development bonds is located must approve the issuance
of the bonds; and
WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of
the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County"), the Project is to be
located in the County and the Board of Supervisors of the County
I
of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Board") constitutes the highest
elected governmental officials of the County; and
WHEREAS, the Authority recommends that the Board of
Supervisors approve the issuance of the Bond; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving
-----
the issuance of the Bond, subject to the terms to be agreed upon,
~
~
352
December 18, 1984
and a certificate of the public hearing has been filed with the
Board.
I
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. The Board of Supervisors approves the issuance of
the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, as
required by Section 103(k), to permit the Authority to assist in
the financing of the Project.
2. The approval of the issuance of the Bond, as
required by Section 103(k), does not constitute an endorsement to
a prospective purchaser of the Bond of the creditworthiness of
the Project or the Company, and, as required by Section 15.1-1380
of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the Bond shall provide
that neither the County nor the Authority shall be obligated to
I
pay the Bond or the interest thereon or other costs incident
thereto except from the revenues and moneys pledged therefor and
neither the faith or credit nor the taxing power of the
Commonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged
thereto.
3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon
its adoption.
On motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Minter, McGraw, Burton, Brittle, and Nickens
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 84-245 APPROVING THE ISSUANCE
OF THE BOND OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THOMAS C.
SCORDAS
I
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Authority"), has considered the
application of Thomas C. Scordas (the "Company"), 3420 Electric
Road, Roanoke, Virginia 24018, requesting the issuance of the
Authority's industrial development revenue bond in an amount
estimated at $135,000 (the "Bond") to assist in the financing of
the Companys' acquisition, construction and equipping of an
~
~
r
i '".1 53
t) t.
December 18, 1984
office facility (the "Project") on the southeast side of Starkey
Road across from Tanglewood Square Shopping Center, in Tanglewood
Professional Center in Roanoke County, Virginia, and has held a
I
public hearing thereon on December 12, 1984; and
WHEREAS, Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1954, as amended, provides that the governmental unit having
jurisdiction over the issuer of industrial development bonds and
over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of
industrial development bonds is located must approve the issuance
of the bonds; and
WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of
I the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County"), the Project is to be
located in the County and the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Board") constitutes the highest
elected governmental officials of the County; and
WHEREAS, the Authority recommends that the Board of
I
Supervisors approve the issuance of the Bond; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving
the issuance of the Bond, subject to the terms to be agreed upon,
and a certificate of the public hearing has been filed with the
Board.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, virginia, as follows:
1. The Board of Supervisors approves the issuance of
the Bond by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, as
required by Section 103(k), to permit the Authority to assist in
the financing of the Project.
2. The approval of the issuance of the Bond, as
I
required by Section 103(k), does not constitute an endorsement to
a prospective purchaser of the Bond of the creditworthiness of
the Project or the Company, and, as required by Section 15.1-1380
of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the Bond shall provide
that neither the County nor the Authority shall be obligated to
-----
~
~
December 18, 1984
354
I
pay the Bond or the interest thereon or other costs incident
thereto except from the revenues and moneys pledged therefor and
neither the faith or credit nor the taxing power of the
Commonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged
thereto.
3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon
its adoption.
On motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Minter, McGraw, Burton, Brittle, and Nickens
NAYS: None
2. Department of Public Facilities - John Hubbard,
Superintendent of Public Facilities, requested that Item a, the
report on Cherokee Hills Water Supply be removed from the agenda
until further notice. Supervisor McGraw asked Mr. Hubbard and
his staff to contact the people involved with this project more
I
often.
Mr. Hubbard requested that the Board approve the order
concerning Lantern Drive to be submitted to the Highway
Department. Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the order of
Lantern Drive. The motion carried by a unanimous roll call vote.
Mr. Hubbard also reported to the Board that the
lighting is now complete at the Mt. Pleasant Park Development and
the entire project should be completed by spring.
3. Department of Development - Timothy Gubala,
Superintendent of Development, presented a report on the
Industrial Development Bond Allocations. Mr. Gubala reported
that all industrial development projects must be closed by
December 31, 1984, or the funds provided will be returned to the
I
State allocation.
6. County Attorney - Supervisor Minter moved for
approval of the prepared resolution concerning the legal aspects
of the Finance Board recommendation for Bank Services.
RESOLUTION 84-221 ACCEPTING A CERTAIN
PROPOSAL FOR BANK SERVICES FOR ROANOKE
COUNTY
I---
~
"..-
n~5
~.~ ~)
.
December 18, 1984
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain proposal of Dominion Bankshares
I
in the amount of $1,460.90 for bank services for Roanoke County,
upon all and singular the terms and conditions of the invitation
to bid, the specifications of the County of Roanoke, the bidder's
proposals, and the provisions of this resolution, be, and same
hereby is, ACCEPTED; and
2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized
and directed to execute the necessary documents on behalf of
! Roanoke County, all to be upon form approved by the County
Attorney; and
3. That all other proposals for this service are
I hereby rejected and the Clerk is directed to so notify such
bidders and express the County's appreciation for the submission
I
of their proposals.
On motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens.
NAYS: None
7. County Administrator - Mr. Flanders requested that
the Board accept the donation of 40 acres of land from Mr.
Darnell Vineyard. The land is currently located in Roanoke City
and Mr. Vineyard has requested that the land be developed as a
park if at all possible. Supervisor Brittle moved to accept the
donation of this land and to have the County Attorney draft the
necessary documents for the transfer.
The motion carried by a
unanimous roll call vote.
Supervisor Burton moved for approval of the resolution
I
accepting the donation of water and sewer lines installed at the
development of winterset South, Section 1, and authorizing
Roanoke County to authenticate such acceptance.
I---
RESOLUTION 84-222 ACCEPTING THE
DONATION OF WATER AND SEWER LINES
~
~
356
December 18, 1984
I
INSTALLED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF
WINTERSET SOUTH, SECTION 1, AND
AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
TO DULY AUTHENTICATE SUCH ACCEPTANCE
AS MADE AND PROVIDED BY LAW
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the offer of F & B Developer, Inc., developers
of winter set South, Section 1, to donate the water and sewer
lines installed with the development of winterset South,
Section 1, in Roanoke County to the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County be, and hereby is, accepted; and
2. That upon receipt of a duly executed deed upon a form
approved by the County Attorney, from F & B Developer, Inc.
conveying the hereinabove mentioned water and sewer lines to the
Board of Supervisors, the County Administrator is hereby
authorized to authenticate the acceptance thereof, as made and
I
provided by Section 15.1-286 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as
amended.
On motion of Supervisor Burton and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens.
NAYS: None.
Mr. Flanders advise the Board the he will appoint
Timothy Gubala, Superintendent of Department of Development, to
be acting County Administrator while Mr. Flanders is on vacation
from December 20 through December 31, 1984. This appointment was
approved unanimously.
IN RE:
PROCLAMATIONS AND RESOLUTIONS
I
Supervisor Burton moved for approval of the following
prepared resolution expressing appreciation to Dorothy Butler for
her service to Roanoke County.
RESOLUTION 84-224 EXPRESSING THE
APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO DOROTHY BUTLER FOR
FORTY YEARS SERVICE TO THE COUNTY
-----
~
r
~~7
December 18, 1984
WHEREAS, Dorothy Butler was first employed by the
County of Roanoke in August, 1944, in the office of Treasurer A.
M Bowman, Jr. and whereas during her period of service she did
serve as Chief Deputy Treasurer from 1969 until the present; and
I
WHEREAS, Dorothy Butler has been a good and faithful
employee in the Treasurer's Office of Roanoke County having
served with five of Roanoke County's ten Treasurers.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its heartfelt
appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke
County to Dorothy Butler for her loyal and dedicated service of
forty years in the Roanoke County Treasurer's Office; and
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does, on behalf of
the citizens of Roanoke County, express its best wishes for a
happy, restful and productive retirement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that an attested copy of this
I
resolution duly authenticated be forthwith presented to Dorothy
Butler.
On motion of Supervisor Burton and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, McGraw, Minter, and Nickens.
NAYS: None
Chairman Nickens presented the approved resolution to
Dorothy Butler and also presented her with a certificate of
appreciation and a $100 series EE United States Savings Bond.
Chairman Nickens presented a resolution to Rescue
Squadsman David G. Lindsey, Jr. and Fire Fighter Samuel D.
Robinson. Supervisor Minter moved for approval of the prepared
RESOLUTION 84-225 COMMENDING FIRE FIGHTER
SAMUEL D. ROBINSON OF ROANOKE COUNTY
VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT AND RESCUE
SQUAD #5
I
resolutions.
WHEREAS, on November 21, 1983, at approximately 5:30
p.m. the Roanoke County Volunteer Fire Department and Rescue
Squad #5 responded to an emergency at the Carvins Cove Recreation
-----
.
l
.~
December 18, 1984 3 5 8
area involving a boating accident and possible drowning. It was
a cold, dark evening and neither the boat nor the victims could
I
be immediately located. Despite visibility problems, a rescue
boat was immediately launched with Fire Fighter Samuel D.
Robinson and Rescue Squadsman David G. Lindsey, Jr. aboard;
however, the outboard motor malfunctioned. In order to save
valuable time Mr. Robinson and Mr. Lindsey proceeded to row the
boat by hand to the location of the capsized boat where they
rescued two live victims from the water. These victims were
treated at the scene for hypothermia and transported to the
hospital.
WHEREAS, this accident was unfortunate and the loss of
one life tragic but the two survivors were fortunate. Fire
Fighter Robinson and Squadsman Lindsey responded as quickly as
possible to this emergency, located the victims quickly and
I
rescued them from the water. Their actions exemplify the
dedication and professionalism of the Roanoke County Volunteer
Fire Fighters and Rescue Squadsmen.
WHEREAS, Samuel D. Robinson has been a member of the
Roanoke County Fire Department #5 since 1976 and has been very
active in the operation of the department, serving on the
training committee which is responsible for the planning of all
fire fighter training. He currently resides at Bent Creek
Apartments with his wife and two children and is employed by
Viking Jet-Away.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors commends Samuel D. Robinson for his heroic and
I
special efforts in this rescue operation and hereby awards Samuel
D. Robinson with the Medal of Valor.
On motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens
NAYS: None
-----
I~
r 359
December 18, 1984
RESOLUTION 84-226 COMMENDING RESCUE
SQUADSMAN DAVID G. LINDSEY, JR., OF
ROANOKE COUNTY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT
AND RESCUE SQUAD #5
WHEREAS, on November 21, 1983, at approximately 5:30
I
p.m. the Roanoke County Volunteer Fire Department and Rescue
Squad #5 responded to an emergency at the Carvins Cove Recreation
area involving a boating accident and possible drowning. It was
a cold, dark evening and neither the boat nor the victims could
be immediately located. Despite visibility problems, a rescue
boat was immediately launched with Fire Fighter Samuel D.
Robinson and Rescue Squadsman David G. Lindsey, Jr. aboard;
however, the outboard motor malfunctioned. In order to save
valuable time Mr. Robinson and Mr. Lindsey proceeded to row the
boat by hand to the location of the capsized boat where they
rescued two live victims from the water. These victims were
treated at the scene for hypothermia and transported to the
I
hospital.
WHEREAS, this accident was unfortunate and the loss of
one life tragic but the two survivors were fortunate. Fire
Fighter Robinson and Squadsman Lindsey responded as quickly as
possible to this emergency, located the victims quickly and
rescued them from the water. Their actions exemplify the
dedication and professionalism of the Roanoke County Volunteer
Fire Fighters and Rescue Squadsmen.
WHEREAS, David G. Lindsey, Jr. has been a member of the
Roanoke County Rescue Squad #5 since 1982 and has been very
active in the operation of the department and has pursued
training to the Shock Trauma Technician Level of the Advanced
I
Life Support Program. He currently resides on Fairway Forest
Drive in Salem, Virginia, and is employed by Roanoke Ready Mix.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors commends David G. Lindsey, Jr. for his heroic and
special efforts in this rescue operation and hereby awards David
G. Lindsey, Jr. with the Medal of Valor.
-----
l
~
December 18, 1984
360
On motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens.
I
NAYS: None.
Chairman Nickens presented the resolutions to David G.
Lindsey and Samuel D. Robinson. Chairman Nickens also presented
a Roanoke County Medal of Valor to each rescuer. Mr.
Robinson'sand Mr. Lindsey's names will be placed on the Medal of
Valor plaque to be placed at the Roanoke County Administration
Center.
Chairman Nickens presented a resolution thanking Mrs.
Mabel Smith for her service on the Roanoke County Planning
Commission. Supervisor Burton moved for approval of the prepared
resolution.
I
RESOLUTION 84-227 EXPRESSING THE
APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO MRS. MABEL SMITH FOR
NINE YEARS SERVICE ON THE ROANOKE COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSION
WHEREAS, Mabel Smith was appointed to serve as the
Windsor Hills Magisterial District representative to the Roanoke
County Planning Commission in 1975 to fill an unexpired term; she
was reappointed again in 1976 and 1980, serving a total of nine
years with perfect attendance; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Smith has served on committees for the
improvement of the appearance of Roanoke County through the
establishment of the junk car ordinance, sign ordinance, and
satellite dish ordinance; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Smith has also served on many civic
commissions and was instrumental in the acquisition and location
I
of the new Southwest County Postal Office; and
WHEREAS, Mabel Smith was instrumental in reasserting
the planning movement in Roanoke County during her era on the
Planning Commission and was adamant in her request for increased
staff committment to the planning and zoning function.
-----
~
r361
December 18, 1984
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County that the Board does hereby on
behalf of its members and former Board members who served and
I
worked with Mabel Smith and on behalf of the citizens of Roanoke
County express to Mabel Smith its heartfelt appreciation for her
dedication and efforts expended in addressing the needs and
solving the problems of the citizens of Roanoke County over the
many years she devoted to Roanoke County government; and
FURTHER that an attested copy duly authenticated be
forthwith presented to Mrs. Mabel Smith.
On motion of Supervisor Burton and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens.
NAYS: None.
Chairman Nickens presented the resolution to Mrs. Mabel
Smith.
Chairman Nickens presented a resolution congratulating
I
Roanoke County 4-H club members for winning national and state
4-H competitions.
RESOLUTION 84-228 CONGRATULATING 4-H
MEMBERS, ROBIN SILVER AND JULIE BOLT FOR
BEING SELECTED STATE AND NATIONAL WINNERS
IN 4-H COMPETITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That congratulations be extended to Roanoke County
4-H members, Robin Silver for being selected first place winner
in State 4-H Achievement and first alternate to a $1,000
scholarship in national competition, also to Julie Bolt for being
selected first place in State 4-H Fashion Revue competition and
I
third alternate to a $1,000 scholarship in national competition;
and
2. That the Roanoke County 4-H program be acknowledged
for providing training and leadership opportunities for growth
-----
~
~
362
December 18, 1984
and development of Roanoke County youth as exhibited by Robin
Silver and Julie Bolt.
I
On motion of Supervisor Brittle and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens.
NAYS: None
Chairman Nickens presented the resolution to Lowell
Gobble, VPI & SU Extension Agent. Chairman Nickens and Mr.
Flanders presented Julie Bolt and Robin Silvers with Roanoke
County pins and certificates of appreciation.
IN RE:
CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
I
Mr. G. L. McFarland spoke on the Albert Farm property
(Diuguids Lane). He reported that the neighborhood wants to
support the Board and has appointed Scott and Anita Large as
contacts.
I
Ms. Elizabeth Patterson spoke on behalf of the Big Hill
area citizens requesting a Community Center and a park within
their area. The citizens feel that the Community Center should
be first since it can be used all year. Chairman Nickens
reported to Ms. Patterson that this area will be considered in
the park study.
Mr. James Smith, President, Catawba Valley Ruritan
Club, spoke regarding the use of the Catawba School as a
Community Center. Mr. Smith requested a resolution to finalize
the decision on the Community Center and to receive some sort of
response from the Board of Supervisors.
Harold Wingate also spoke before the Board on behalf of
the Catawba citizens. Mr. Wingate reported that he had made
efforts to meet with the architect at the Catawba School but was
not successful. Mr. Wingate reported that he had two roofing
contractors appraise the roof and both feel that the roof does
not need to be replaced. Mr. Wingate reported that a retired
-
~
r
3 {~~ 3
, '\..,.,.
December 18, 1984
electrical contractor within the community that has expressed a
willingness to help out as much as he can. Supervisor McGraw
reported that he had received an estimate from the architect to
I
renovate the building as should be done in excess of $40,000.
Supervisor Brittle suggested that the matter be referred to staff
to look into selling the property to the Catawba Community.
Chairman Nickens suggested that Mr. Wingate, Mr. Smith, and
others from the community meet with two members of the Board with
a representative from the School Board, and the architect who
performed the evaluation and come back to the Board at the second
meeting in January, January 22, 1985. Supervisor Minter
suggested a matching arrangement wherein the County would match
the funds donated by the citizens. Supervisor Brittle
volunteered to serve on the committee but requested that they
come before the Board at the February 12, 1985, meeting.
Mr. Leo B. Trenor, 543 Petty Avenue, NE, Roanoke,
I
Virginia, spoke to the Board concerning the sale of alcoholic
beverages. Mr. Trenor requested that the Board and other
members of committees to go to the legislators and request a law
to be passed requiring all persons selling alcoholic beverages
(convenience stores and bars) to have an individual license.
Chairman Nickens requested Paul Mahoney, County Attorney, to
check into the legal ramifications of requiring these licenses.
IN RE:
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Chairman Nickens announced that Marshall Harris,
Petitioner, requested that the public hearing Item K-l, the
Petition of Marshall Harris requesting rezoning from R-l to
I
R-5 of a tract containing 10 acres located east of Old Manor
Drive and adjacent to the south boundary of the Mountain View
Elementary School and located in the Hollins Magisterial
District, on the agenda be postponed to a later date.
-
~
~
364
December 18, 1984
I
Petition of Larson Oaks
Associates requesting rezoning from
Residential R-l to Residential R-6 of
a tract containing 18.3 acres located
off Larson Lane, SW, bordered on the
north by Adamson Road and located in
the Windsor Hills Magisterial
District.
APPROVED
Sam Lionberger, builder/developer of the property, was
present to answer any questions of the Board. Mr. Roy Jarrett,
owner of the property, was also present as were Mr. Gordon Late,
syndicator and developer, and Buford Lumsden, engineer. Mr.
Lionberger reported that there would be seven or eight lots
developed with townhomes and the access would be off Adamson Road.
The other sixteen lots would have a primary entrance and exit off
Tamaranne Drive and Larson Lane. Traffic impact is estimated at
I II
I
I
I
470 vehicular trips per day.
Mr. Ray Robrecht was present representing the
opposition to this development. Mr. Robrecht and his clients
feel that these townhomes should not be developed between two
subdivisions and feel that it would be disruptive in the
community. The citizens opposing this development have been told
by the developer that the land could be and would develop the
land as single family. The citizens are willing to accept this
but oppose the townhomes.
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
parcel of land, legally described below, be rezoned from
Residential R-l District to Residential R-6 District.
I
BEGINNING at a point on the easterly side of Tomaranne
Drive, said point being located S. 430 45' E. 10.0 feet and S.
360 10' 10" E. 41.66 feet from the southwesterly corner of Lot
30, Block 2, Section 1, Melody Acres (Plat Book 4, page 55);
thence with the easterly side of Tomaranne Drive along the arc of
a circle to the left whose radius is 157.89 feet and whose chord
is N. 360 10' 10" W. 41.66 feet an arc distance of 41.78 feet to
a point; thence N. 430 45' W. 10 feet to a point; thence N. 380
07' E. 141.42 feet to a point; thence N. 430 45' W. 712.90 feet
to a point marked by an old iron; thence N. 840 46' E. 242.54
feet to a point marked by an old iron, thence N. 720 46' E. 335.0
-----
~
~
I
I
or~)'
.~ iP ~.
December 18, 1984
feet to a point in the center of Greenview Road; thence S. 410
OS' E. 428.91 feet to a point marked by an old iron; thence S.
390 37' E. 653.36 feet to a point; thence S. 770 02' 30" E. 396.0
feet to a point marked by an old iron; thence S. 620 36' 30" E.
99.0 feet to a point on the boundary of Oak Grove Development
Corporation; thence S. 30 la' 30" W. 362.26 feet to a point;
thence N. 760 29' W. 480.0 feet to a point; thence N. 780 17' W.
340.0 feet to a point marked by an old iron; thence S. 870 51' W.
110.93 feet to a point; being the Southeast corner of Tract "B"
on the Plat hereinafter referred to; thence with the easterly
boundary of Tract "B" N. 50 18' 25" W. 139.53 feet to a point,
being the southeast corner of Tract "A" on said Plat; thence with
the easterly boundary of Tract "a" N. 50 18' 25" W. 334.69 feet
to a point; thence S. 380 07' W. 171.34 feet to the place of
BEGINNING, and containing 18.30 acres, and being designated as
Tract "CD on the Plat of the Survey made for Herman F. Larson
Estate by T. P. Parker and Son, Engineers and Surveyors, dated
December 1, 1974.
I
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
he be directed to reflect that change on the Official Zoning Map
of Roanoke County.
ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Brittle and upon the
following recorded vote:
I
AYES: Supervisors Brittle, McGraw, and Nickens
NAYS: Supervisors Burton and Minter
Petition of Gaby Karim for a
Special Use Permit to operate a
landfill on a 45-acre tract, located
on the southside of State Route 1404
approximately 0.8 miles from State
Route 311 in the Catawba
Magisterial District
DENIED
Mr. Gaby Karim was present before the Board to answer
any questions. Mr. Karim reported that the land was used for
dumping earlier and that he intended to use the area to dump
rocks, concrete slabs, and brush but that all dumped materials
would be covered.
Sheldon Rosenbloom, Route 2, Box 294, Roanoke,
I
Virginia, 24019, was present to oppose the petition. Mr. Sheldon
asked that Mr. J. F. Tobey, Jr., Route 2, Box 293B, Roanoke,
Virginia, 24019, speak for him. Mr. Tobey opposes this petition
because there was no definitive plan, no completion date, the
landfill is not needed, the effect of property value,
-----
~
,
366
December 18, 1984
interference with the natural topography and drainage patterns,
the inability of the road to support heavy trucks or an increase
I
in traffic, air and water pollution potential, and the location
of the landfill as it is adjacent to the roadway which leads to
an increase of and attraction for illegal dumping. Mr. Sheldon
Rosenbloom reported on the traffic conditions that will be
created by this landfill. Mr. Rosenbloom reported that there are
no sidewalks along the roads and there any many children who walk
on that road. Mr. Rosenbloom also reported that parts of the
road are only 13 feet wide and creates no room for traffic to
pass especially for a school bus.
Mr. Newson E. Via, Jr., Route 2, Box 294-G, Roanoke,
Virginia, 24019, reported on the problems the neighborhood has
had regarding dumping.
Raymond J. Hickman, 2729 Montvale Road, SW, Roanoke,
I
Virginia, was also present in opposition of the petition.
Mr. Gerald Hollamon, 1993 Boulevard, Salem, Virginia,
Pastor of the Valley World Ministries Church, was present in
opposition representing the membership of that Church which has
purchased 20 acres of land along Loch Haven Road.
Mr. Karim reported that he is not trying to change the
creek bed. He also reported that he did clean up the area after
the County instructed him to do so and posted the area.
Supervisor McGraw moved to deny the request of the
petitioner. Mrs. Burton reported to Mr. Karim that if this
petition is granted it would not be in keeping with the
Comprehensive Plan and would not be compatible with the
I
surrounding area. The motion carried by a unanimous roll call
vote. Supervisor McGraw directed staff to have area cleaned up
since it could possibly be a health hazard.
Petition of Paul E. Durham for a
Special Exception Permit to place a
mobile home on a 1.75 acre tract
located on the south side of Route
688 approximately 600 feet from the
intersection of State Route 688 and
----
~
~
367
December 18, 1984
613 in the Cave Spring Magisterial
District.
TABLED UNTIL JANUARY 8, 1985
I
Mr. Durham was present to answer any questions of the
Board. Mr. Durham reported that the land was given to them by
their mother-in-law and his mother-in-law needs them near her for
help since she has recently been sick. Mr. Durham has already
looked into dozing the land. Mr. Durham reported that the mobile
home will be placed 500 to 600 feet away from the road.
Mr. Cecil Meador, adjacent property owner to Mr.
Durham's land, was present in opposition of this rezoning
request.
Supervisor Burton requested a sketch of the profile of
the slope involved in the grading. Supervisor Brittle moved to
table this public hearing to January 8, 1985.
The motion carried
by a unanimous voice vote.
I
Petition of Barry L. and Brenda J.
Ward requesting rezoning from Residential
Estates of two tracts of land containing
a total of 2.102 acres and located at
426 Crestland Drive in the Hollins
Magisterial District. Planning Commission
recommends approval.
APPROVED
Maryellen F. Goodlatte of Glenn, Flippin, Feldmann &
Darby was present on behalf of Barry and Brenda Ward. They are
requesting rezoning to maintain horses and construction of a barn
Charles Osterhoudt, the immediate next door neighbor of
the Wards, was present in support of the rezoning request.
Supervisor Minter moved for approval of the rezoning
I
request.
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
tract of land, more particularly described below, be rezoned from
R-l to RE, subject to the conditions proffered by the Petitioners
f----
and attached to this Order.
~
~
December 18, 1984
36~
All that certain tract or parcel of land located in
Roanoke County, Virginia situated on the northern line of
I
Crestland Drive and more particularly described in accordance
with a plat of survey by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers and
Surveyors, Salem, Virginia, dated June 27, 1978, a copy of which
is attached hereto and made a part hereof as follows:
BEGINNING at a point in the northern line of Crestland Drive
corner with the property of Barry L. Ward hence South 840 OS' 24"
W., a distance of 80 feet to an iron pin. Hence a new line
extending North 090 54' 28" W., a distance of 379.04 feet to a
point marked by an iron pin set in the center line of Carvins
Creek thence North 840 36' E., a distance of 7.50 feet to a
point, thence North 880 25' E., a distance of 55 feet to a point
corner with Barry L. Ward property. Thence South 120 38' E., a
distance of 376.50 feet to the point and place of beginning.
Being the same property conveyed to Barry L. Ward and Brenda J.
Ward, husband and wife by deed dated July 24, 1978, from Dorothy
L. Cocke, widow, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia in Deed Book 1104, page
528.
I
BEGINNING at an iron stake on the north side of Crestland Drive
(40 feet wide), a corner of the property of John W. Neikirk;
thence leaving Crestland Drive and running with said Neikirk, N.
120 38' W., passing an iron pipe on line at 351.10 feet, in all a
total distance of 376.50 feet to a point in Carvins Creek in the
line of Section No.1, Sunnybrook; thence with same and up said
Carvins Creek, N. 880 25' E. 50.96 feet to a point; thence N. 800
IS' E. 50.60 feet to a point; thence S. 880 16' E. 74.72 feet to
a point; thence leaving Carvins Creek and with a new division
line through the property of Matilda K. Peck, S. 120 38' E.,
passing an iron stake on line at 71.77 feet, in all a total
distance of 371.71 feet to an iron stake on the north side of
Crestland Drive; thence with same S. 880 121 W. 78.60 feet to an
iron stake; thence S. 840 OS' W 96.40 feet to the point of
BEGINNING, containing 1.486 Acres; and
Being the same property conveyed to Barry L. Ward and Brenda
Joyce Ward, husband and wife, by deed dated January 19, 1976 from
Matilda K. Peck and Homer S. Peck, husband and wife, of record in
the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1036, page 420.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the County Planner and that he be and hereby is
I
directed to reflect that change on the official zoning maps of
the County, and that a copy of this order be transmitted to the
County Planner and that he be and hereby is directed to reflect
that change on the official zoning maps of the County, and that a
copy of this order be transmitted to Glenn, Flippin, Feldmann &
Darby, attorneys for the Petitioners.
-----
~
r
I
36~
December 18, 1984
The foregoing resolution was adopted on motion of
Supervisor Minter and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and
I
Nickens
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
None
PROFFER OF CONDITIONS
The Petitioner hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board
of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following
conditions to the zoning request hereinabove set forth:
1. The barn to be constructed on the subject property
shall be located behind the dwelling house.
2. The proposed fence to be erected on the subject
property shall be placed north of an imaginary line connecting
the rear corner of the residence on the subject property with the
rear corner of the adjoining residence of Charles and Beverly
I
Osterhoudt.
3. No more than three horses shall be maintained on
the subject property.
Petition of Olympia Motor Inns, Inc.
requesting rezoning from R-l, Residential
to B-2 Business District, of a tract containing
2.066 acres located at 7887 Carvins Street
the Hollins Magisterial District
APPROVED
Jennings T. Bird of Bird, Kinder & Huffman, was present
on behalf of Olympia Motor Inns, Inc. Olympia Motor Inns, Inc.
is requesting rezoning to construct and operate a motel with a
Charles Osterhoudt of Osterhoudt, Ferguson, Natt,
I
restaurant.
Aheron & Agee, representing citizens opposing this request.
The
citizens oppose this rezoning because of the screening and
buffering condition imposed. They feel that although trees will
be planted along the boundary, there will be no way for them to
----
~
,
370
December 18, 1984
block light and noise as they will not be grown trees. The
citizens feel that the residential district will eventually be
I
done away with in this area.
Supervisor Minter moved to deny the request of the
petitioner. The motion failed by a 4-1 vote as follows:
AYES: Supervisor Minter
NAYS: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, McGraw, and Nickens
Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the request of the
petitioner.
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
tract of land, more particularly described below, be rezoned from
R-l to B-2.
I
BEING all that parcel situate in Roanoke
County, Virginia, consisting of Lots 10-12
Section 1, Walrond Court, identified in the
Roanoke County Property Identification Maps
as Parcels 27.06-4-5, 27.06-4-6 and 27.06-4-7
and being further known as 7887 Carvins Street,
NW.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the County Planner and that he be and hereby is
directed to reflect that change on the official zoning maps of
the County.
ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor McGraw and upon the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, McGraw, and Nickens
NAYS: None.
PROFFER OF CONDITIONS
The Petitioner, Olympia Motor Inns, Inc., hereby
I
voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, the following conditions to the zoning request
hereinabove set forth:
1. There shall be no street entrances from the
property onto Carvins Street except as required by State or local
governmental ordinances and codes.
-----
~
"..
~3ì71
December 18, 1984
2. There shall be no more than five (5) building
entrances or doors facing adjoining property that is zoned for
single-family residential use except as required by State or
local governmental ordinances and codes or as reasonably required
to provide access for installation or maintenance of equipment,
fixtures and similar items.
3. There will be no windows from motel rooms or rental
units facing adjoining property that is zoned for single-family
residential use.
4. A landscaped buffer zone will be established and
maintained around the perimeter of the property in accordance
with all applicable requirements of Roanoke County Ordinances,
including but not limited to Draft 7, Screening and Buffering
Provisions, Zoning Text Amendment.
5. Development of a motel and restaurant on the
property will be in general accord with the Preliminary Site Plan
prepared by Richard H. Gregory and Associates and filed with the
rezoning Petition.
6. The number of motel rooms or units will not exceed
one hundred one (101).
7. The property will not be used for the following
purposes which are otherwise allowed in the B-2, Business
District:
I
I
(a) Home appliance sales and services;
(b) Coin-operated laundries and coin-operated
dry-cleaning establishments;
(c) New car dealerships with related facilities;
(d) Public billiard parlors and poolrooms, bowling
alleys, dance halls, golf driving ranges and
similar forms of public amusement.
8. The foregoing conditions shall remain in full force
and effect for as long as any of the adjoining property on the
west side of Carvins Street (the easterly 250 feet of Lot 3 and
I
-
~
,.,
879
low
December 18, 1984
all of Lots 4, 5, and 6, Section 2, Walrond Court) and the
adjoining property to the north (Lot 13, Section 1, Walrond
I
Court) are zoned for single-family residential use.
Petition of W. H. Fralin and K. W. Lester
for rezoning from Residential District R-3
and Business District B-2 to Manufacturing
District M-l, property containing approximately
7.6 acres and located near the intersection of
u. S. Route 220 and Valley Avenue in the
Cave Spring Magisterial District.
APPROVED
Mr. Fralin was present to answer any questions the
Board may have. There were no citizens present in opposition to
the rezoning. Supervisor Brittle moved for approval of the
rezoning petition.
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
I
tract of land, more particularly described on the attached
Exhibit A, be rezoned from B-2 and R-3 to M-l, subject to the
following restrictions and conditions:
1. The site plan presented will be substantially
complied with at the time of building and
developing of the land.
2. No signs will be placed on top of building(s) next
to Valley Avenue.
3. In the event the sale of the property is not
consummated to Mr. Gallagher, or his assigns, the
property zoning will revert to its existing zoning.
4. In addition to the proposed landscaping presented,
all County Code requirements for landscaping will
be met.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the County Planner and that he be and hereby is
I
directed to reflect that change on the official zoning maps of
the County.
ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Brittle and upon the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens
NAYS: None.
-
~
r
I
I
3'7 3
December 18, 1984
EXHIBIT A
Description of property of Heywood Fralin and Karen Lester
located on Valley Avenue, just west of U. S. Route 220, Roanoke
County, Virginia, containing 7.60 acres, more or less:
BEGINNING at a point on the north side of Valley Avenue, being
the southwesterly corner of the property owned by Heywood Fralin
and Karen Lester, said point being on the line of the property of
Dorothy V. and Elonza L. Nye; thence leaving Valley Avenue and
following a line between the Fralin, et al property and the Nye
property, N. 150 35' 35" W. 654.03 feet to a point; thence
continuing with said property, S. 820 51' W. 91.34 feet to a
point; thence continuing with said property, N. 80 50' W. 396.0
feet to a point, corner to the property of Mary C. Jordan Heirs;
thence with the property of the Jordan Heirs, N. 790 47' E.
271.53 feet to a point; thence with a new line through the
Fralin, et al property, S. 150 50' E. 132.05 feet to a point;
thence N. 810 00' E. 69.94 feet to a point corner to the property
of American Motor Inn, Inc.; thence S. 180 00' E. 60.90 feet to a
point; thence N. 800 45' E. 44.0 feet to a point; thence leaving
the American Motor Inn, Inc. property and following the line of
Allen Moran Property, S. 50 00' E. 60.0 feet to a point; thence
N. 800 50' E. 49.50 feet to a point; thence S. 50 00' E. 64.0
feet to a point, corner to the property of Kenneth E. Lucas;
thence with the Lucas property, S. 810 00' W. 48.25 feet to a
point; thence continuing with the Lucas property, S. 60 04' E.
79.29 feet to a point, corner to the Moran property; thence S.
110 34' 20" E. 127.64 feet to a point; thence with new lines
through the Fralin, et al property, S. 770 48' W. 51.86 feet to a
point; thence S. 200 55' E. 427.5 feet, more or less, to a point
on the north side of Valley Avenue; thence with the same, S. 390
52' 55" W. 37.5 feet, more or less, to a point on same; thence
with a curve to the right, whose chord is S. 500 10' 30" W.
203.60 feet to a point; thence continuing with Valley Avenue, S.
650 57' 30" W. 44.67 feet to a point; thence S. 240 02' 30" E. 10
feet to a point; thence continuing with Valley Avenue, S. 630 52'
30" W. 125.0 feet to the point of BEGINNING, and containing 7.60
acres, more or less, and being as shown on map platted from
records for Heywood Fralin, dated April 9, 1982.
I
I
Public Hearing on Ordinance amending
Section 19-8 of the Roanoke County Code
"Exemption of Real Property Tax on
Property of Certain Elderly or Disabled
Persons" by increasing certain income
and net worth dollar limits.
APPROVED
Mr. Mahoney, County Attorney, reported that the
approval of this ordinance would increase the dollar amounts in
the existing County ordinance concerning the tax relief for the
I
elderly. Specifically this would increase from $15,000 to
$18,000 on the combined income provision and increase the
combined net worth provision from $55,000 to $65,000.
~
~
.,
374
December 18, 1984
Mr. F. G. Stephenson, 5608 Merriman Road, Chairman of
the Advisory Council of the League of Older Americans spoke
in favor of the increase of these limits.
I
Mr. Bruce Bloodworth, 120 Trinkle Avenue, NE, Roanoke,
Virginia, Secretary of the League of Older Americans was also
present in favor of the increase.
Supervisor Brittle moved for approval of the prepared
ordinance.
ORDINANCE 84-232 AMENDING SECTION 19.8
OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE "EXEMPTION
OF REAL PROPERTY TAX ON PROPERTY OF
CERTAIN ELDERLY OR DISABLED PERSONS"
BY INCREASING CERTAIN INCOME AND NET
WORTH DOLLAR LIMITS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
I
1. That Section 19.8 of the Roanoke County be amended
to read and provide as follows:
Section 19.8. Exemption of real property tax on property of
certain elderly and disabled persons.
(a)
* * * *
The person or persons seeking an exemption shall file
an application for exemption in affidavit form with the
Commissioner of the Revenue all annually before April 1 to be
exempt for the current year. Such application shall set forth
the combined income of the owners and their relatives living in
the dwelling on such property for the preceding calendar year.
To be eligible for the exemption the owners and their relatives
living in the dwelling shall not have a combined income which
exceeds, from all sources $:1:5,999 $18,000 per annum provided
however, that the the first $4,000 of income of each relative,
other than the spouse of the owner or owners, who is living in
the dwelling shall not be included in such total. In addition
the owners and the spouse of any owner shall not have a total
combined net worth, including all equitable interests, which
exceeds $55,999 $65,000 as of December 31 of the immediately
preceding calendar year. The amount of net worth specified
herein shall not include the value of the sole dwelling house and
up to one acre of land.
* * * *
This amendment to take effect on December 18, 1984..
I
On motion of Supervisor Brittle and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens.
NAYS: None
Public Hearing on adoption of a resolution
pursuant to Section 15.1-238 (e) of the
1950 Code of Virginia, as amended setting
forth the intent of Roanoke County to enter
upon certain property and take possession of
and ownership of real estate in connection
-
-~
"..-----
~7 5
December 18, 1984
with the construction of a water supply system
and reservoir.
John Hubbard, Superintendent of Public Facilities,
I
presented a map to the Board of Supervisors showing present
property owners. They are: Reynolds, Knapp, and Link - joint
owners; Obenchain; Wohlford; and Young.
Mr. Glenn Knapp, 135 Elwood Street, Hollins, Virginia,
spoke against Roanoke County's purchase of this property.
Chairman Nickens assured Mr. Knapp that it was not the intent of
the County to proceed into condemnation proceedings but must
consider the long range needs of the citizens. Mr. Nickens also
informed Mr. Knapp that this property is the best located for a
regional raw water supply impoundment.
Mr. Harry Young, 370 Fort Lewis Boulevard, Salem,
Virginia, also spoke against the purchase of this land. He is
concerned about the purchase price. Mr. Young feels that they
I
should receive an amount large enough to purchase another 10
acres like his present property.
Ms. Juanita Obenchain, also spoke concerning the
purchase price of this land.
Supervisor McGraw moved for approval of the prepared
resolution.
RESOLUTION 84-229 PURSUANT TO TITLE 25
AND SECTION 15.1-238 (e) OF THE 1950 CODE
OF VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED, SETTING FORTH
THE INTENT OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO ENTER
UPON CERTAIN PROPERTY AND TO TAKE
POSSESSION OF AND OWNERSHIP IN CERTAIN
REAL ESTATE IN CONNECTION WITH THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM AND
RESERVOIR
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
I
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the construction of a water supply system and
reservoir in the western portion of Roanoke County is necessary
to provide a source of water for the citizens of the Roanoke
Valley. In order to provide this water supply system it will be
-
~
~
376
December 18, 1984
necessary to acquire, take possession of and ownership in certain
real estate described as follows:
I
a) Approximately 10.0 acres, more or less, owned by
Harry W. Young and Kathleen M. Young being known
officially by Map Number 83.00-1-5 and more
particularly described in Deed Book 930, page 438.
The fair market value of the aforesaid property to be
acquired is $5,900.00, such compensation and damages,
if any, having been offered the property owners.
b) Approximately 51.50 acres, more or less, owned by
H. M. Obenchain being a portion of a larger tract of
real estate consisting of approximately 61 acres and
more particularly described in Deed Book 1035, page
149.
The fair market value of the aforesaid property to be
acquired is $11,113.00, such compensation and
damages, if any, having been offered the property
owners.
I
c) Approximately 54.51 acres, more or less, owned by
Mary Ann Wohlford being a portion of a larger tract
of real estate consisting of approximately 61 acres
and more particularly described in Deed Book 816,
page 500.
The fair market value of the aforesaid property to be
acquired is $27,908.00, such compensation and
damages, if any, having been offered the property
owners.
d) Approximately 167.00 acres, more or less, owned
by Harold D. Reynolds and Betty Reynolds; Jerry L.
Link and Kathleen V. Link; and L. Glenn Knapp and
Shirley B. Knapp being a portion of a larger tract of
real estate consisting of approximately 289.50 acres
and more particularly described in Deed Book 1151,
page 224.
The fair market value of the aforesaid property to be
acquired is $86,000.00, such compensation and
damages, if any, having been offered the property
owners.
2. That it is immediately necessary for the County to
enter upon and take such property and commence construction of
said water supply system and reservoir and any other
I
appurtenances to a water supply system in order to more
adequately serve the needs of the citizens of the Roanoke Valley
and to thereafter institute and conduct appropriate condemnation
proceedings as to said properties and interests in real estate;
and
-----
i~
~
377
December 18, 1984
3. That pursuant to the provisions of Title 25 and
§15.1-238 (e) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and
therein, the Board does hereby invoke all and singular the rights
I
pursuant to notice and public hearing as made and provided
and privileges and provisions of said §15.1-238 (e) as to the
vesting of powers in the County pursuant to §§33.1-119 through
33.1-129 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, all as made
and provided by law.
On motion of Supervisor McGraw and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens
NAYS: None
Public hearing on adoption of a resolution
pursuant to Section 15.1-238 (e) of the
1950 Code of Virginia, as amended setting
forth the intent of Roanoke County to enter
upon certain property and take possession
of and ownership of certain real estate and
easements in connection with the construction
of a water supply system including water
tank, booster station, water lines and
access easements
I
APPROVED
John Hubbard, Superintendent of Public Facilities,
reported that this property is needed for the EPA Super Fund
Project that will supply potable water to the Big Hill area.
Roanoke County is proceeding on behalf of the EPA in obtaining
all necessary property. The property required is the tank lot
and access across the Hurt property and the booster station lot
on the Richards property.
Mr. Richard Hurt, Route 3, Box 154, Salem, Virginia,
was present opposing the price the County is offering for the
land.
Mr. Hubbard reported that a half million gallon tank
I
which stands about 45 feet above ground would be installed at
this site.
Mr. Danny Richards, 5488 Yale Drive, Salem, Virginia,
was also present to oppose Roanoke County's purchase of this
----
property.
~
~
378
December 18, 1984
Supervisor McGraw moved for approval of the prepared
resolution.
I
RESOLUTION 84-230 PURSUANT TO TITLE 25
AND SECTION 15.1-238 (e) OF THE 1950 CODE
OF VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED, SETTING FORTH
THE INTENT OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO ENTER
UPON CERTAIN PROPERTY AND TO TAKE
POSSESSION OF AND OWNERSHIP IN CERTAIN
REAL ESTATE AND EASEMENTS IN CONNECTION
WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WATER SUPPLY
SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the construction of a water supply system,
including a water tank, booster station, water lines and access
easements in that portion of Roanoke County known as "Big Hill"
is necessary to provide a source of water for the citizens of
that area. In order to provide this water supply system it will
I
be necessary to acquire, take possession of and ownership in
certain real estate and easements described as follows:
a) A tank lot (0.229 ac.); a 20' water line and 10'
temporary construction easement; a 20' access
easement and 20' slope easement across the property
of Carrie B. Hurt being known officially by Tax Map
No. 64.03-1-7, and more particularly described in
Deed Book 480, page 336.
The fair market value of the aforesaid property to be
acquired is $1,999.00, such compensation and damages,
if any, having been offered the property owners.
b) A booster station lot (0.035 ac.) and IS' water
line easement and slope easement across the property
of Helen Cox Richards being known officially by Tax
Map No. 64.02-2.10 and more particularly described in
Deed Book 484, page 150 and Deed Book 245, page 314.
The fair market value of the aforesaid property to be
acquired is $2,231.00, such compensation and damages,
if any, having been offered the property owners.
I
2. That it is immediately necessary for the County to
enter upon and take such property and commence construction of
said water supply system and any other appurtenances to a water
supply system in order to more adequately serve the needs of the
citizens of the Roanoke Valley and to thereafter institute and
conduct appropriate condemnation proceedings as to said
properties and interests in real estate; and
-----
I~
".-
:3 ~l ~ December 18, 1984
3. That pursuant to the provisions of Title 25 and
§15.1-238 (e) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and
pursuant to notice and public hearing as made and provided
therein, the Board does hereby invoke all and singular the rights
I
and privileges and provisions of said §15.1-238 (e) as to the
vesting of powers in the County pursuant to §§33.1-119 through
33.1-129 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, all as made
and provided by law.
On motion of Supervisor McGraw and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens.
NAYS: None
Public hearing on an Ordinance amending the
County's Franchise Ordinance with Roanoke
Valley Cablevision, Inc., to provide for a
decrease in the maximum monthly charges for
the first set including converter
APPROVED
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney, presented the proposed
I
amendment to the ordinance. No one was present in opposition.
Supervisor Burton moved for approval of the prepared resolution.
ORDINANCE 84-231 AMENDING THE COUNTY'S
FRANCHISE ORDINANCE WITH ROANOKE VALLEY
CABLEVISION, INC. TO PROVIDE FOR A
DECREASE IN THE MAXIMUM MONTHLY CHARGES
FOR THE FIRST SET INCLUDING CONVERTER
WHEREAS, Roanoke Valley Cablevision, Inc. has
voluntarily agreed to mutually establish a reduction in the
maximum monthly rate for basic cable television service by
amendment to the County's franchise ordinance with Roanoke Valley
Cablevision, Inc. as set forth in a letter to this Board dated
November 14, 1984.
THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors
I
of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows:
1. That Section 10, Rates and charges, of the County's
franchise ordinance with Roanoke Valley Cablevision, Inc.
enacted by Ordinance Nos. 1178, 1544 and 84-120b. dated January
28, 1975, July 13, 1976, and July 24, 1984, as amended, is hereby
modified and amended as follows:
Section 10. Rates and charges.
A. Subscriber services.
-----
L
,.,
380
December 18, 1984
I
* * * *
Basic Service
A. Residential Rates
Installation Charges
First set
Each additional set
$15.00
7.50
Monthly Charges
Not Less Than Not More Than
--- ---
First set including
converter
$7.50 $7.50
Each additional set
including converter
2.25 5.00
Miscellaneous Charges
Reconnect
Move to location with
existing outlet
Move connection within
home
Home antenna/CATV switch
$8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
$10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
B. Commercial Rates (single unit at one location)
Installation Charges
I
One set
$15.00
Monthly Charges
Not Less Than Not More Than
--- ---
One set
$7.50 $7.50
C. Commercial Rates (multiple units at one location)
Installation charges, monthly charges, and
miscellaneous charges shall be established through
negotiation with the subscriber.
2. This amendment shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage.
On motion of Supervisor Burton and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens.
NAYS: None.
I
Public Hearing on Ordinance amending
Ordinance No. 3350 enacting Chapter 2,
Procurement Practices.
Held Over to January 8, 1985
Public Hearing on Ordinance amending
Chapter 21, zoning, of the Roanoke
County Code to establish screening and
buffering provisions upon the
recommendation to the Zoning Administrator
APPROVED
~
~
".-
'z¡
3~î
December 18, 1984
Rob Stalzer, Planning Coordinator, was present to
answer any questions of the Board. Mr. Stalzer reported that the
ordinance does not discourage innovative landscape design.
I
Supervisor Burton requested definitions for yard, visual
screening, and buffer yards be included in the ordinance. Mr.
Stalzer reported that yard is already in the original zoning
ordinance. Mr. Stalzer also reported that buffer yard and visual
screening has been included. Supervisor Minter moved for
approval of the prepared ordinance.
ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 21, ZONING,
OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE RELATING TO
SCREENING AND BUFFERING PROVISIONS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Section 21-1, Definitions of Chapter 21,
zoning, of the Roanoke County Code relating to screening and
buffering provisions be amended by the repeal of the definition
"Landscaped area" and "Screen planting".
2. That Section 21-50, Yards be amended to read and
provide as follows:
Sec. 21-50. Yards.
Single-family and two-family dwellings in an R-3
District shall conform with the regulations for Residential
District R-l. Two-family dwellings in an R-3 District shall
conform with the regulations for the Residential District R-2.
Townhouses and high-rise apartments shall conform to the
requirements of Article XVIII and XIX, respectively.
Multi-family dwellings shall have the following minimum yards:
I
a. Side. Twenty feet wft~eft-sfta:l::I:-~8e}Hðe-sefee8
~~a8~~8~-Wfte8-aðje~8~8~--R-:l:-a8ð-R-~-B~s~f~e~s.
Each side yard shall be increased ten feet for each
story over two and one-half stories.
b. Rear. Each main building shall have a minimum
rear yard of twenty feet wft~eft-sfta~:I:-~8e~Hðe
sefee8-~}a8~~8~-Wfte8-aðje~8~8~-R-~-a8ð-R-~
B~s~f~e~s~
* * * *
3. That Section 21-54, Parking be amended to read and
I
provide as follows:
Sec. 21-54. Parking.
Parking regulations in an R-3 District shall conform tc
Article XV of this chapter.
A-:l:a8ðsea~eð-afea-e€-a~-:l:eas~-s~*-€ee~-~8-W~ð~ft-Sfta:l::I:
ee-ffia~8~a~8eð-a~-a:l::I:-~~ffieS-Be~Wee8-~afk~8~-a8ð-a8Y-S~fee~
way-:l:~8e-ef-a8y-:l:e~-~e8eð-€ef-fes~ðe8~~a}-Hses~
4. That Section 21-55, Screening regulations be
-----
repealed in its entirety.
L
3t:S2
December 18, 1984
I
5. That Section 21-60, Screen planting be repealed in
its entirety.
6. That Section 21-60.1:9, Parking be amended to read
and provide as follows:
Sec. 21-60.1:9. Parking.
tat Parking regulations in a R-5 District shall
conform to Article XV of this chapter.
tðt--A-:l:aftàsea~eà-a~ea-sfia:l::I:-ðe-ffia~fi~a~fieà-as
fe:l::l:ews-:-
t:l:t--ðe~weeft-~fie-~a~k~ft~-a~ea-afià-~fie-s~~ee~
~~~fi~-ef-way-:l:~fie---s~x-t6t-fee~
t~t--ðe~Weeft-afiy-~a~k~fi~-a~ea-aftà-afiy-R-:I:
Res~àeft~~a:l:-B~s~~~e~---as-~~ev~àeà-~fi-~:I:-6e.:I:-:-:l:e
7. That Section 21-60.1:10, Buffering and screening be
repealed in its entirety.
8. That Section 21-60.2:7, Yards be amended to read
and provide as follows:
Sec. 21-60.2:7. Yards.
Condominiums shall have the following m1n1mum yards:
a. Side. Twenty feet wfi~efi-sfia:l::I:-~fie~eàe-~fie
~e~e~~eà-~eft-fee~-Se~eeft-~:l:afi~~fi~-a~ea-wfieft
aàje~fi~fi~-a-R-:l:-B~s~~~e~. Each side yard shall be
increased ten feet for each story over two and
one-half stories.
I
b. Rear. Each main building shall have a minimum
rear yard of twenty feet wfi~efi-sfia:l::I:-~fte~eàe-~fie
~e~e~~eà-~efi-fee~-Se~eeft-~~aft~~fi~-a~ea-wfieft
aàje~fi~fi~-a-R-:l:-B~s~~~e~.
* * * *
9.
That Section 21-60.2:11, Parking be amended to read
and provide as follows:
Sec. 21-60.2:11. Parking.
tat Parking regulations in an R-6 District shall
conform to Article XV of this chapter.
tðt--A-:l:afiàsea~eà-a~ea-sfia:l:~-ðe-ffia~fi~a~fieà-as
fe~:l:ews-:-
t:l:t--ðe~weefi-~fie-~a~k~fi~-a~ea-afià-~fie-s~~ee~
~~~fi~-ef-way-:l:~fie---s~x-t6t-fee~
t~t--ðe~weeft-~fie-~a~k~fi~-a~ea-afià-afiy-aàjaeefi~-R-:I:
B~s~~~e~---~efi-t:l:et-fee~
10. That Section 21-60.2:12, Screening regulations be
I
repealed in its entirety.
11. That Section 21-75, Area, frontage
regulations; screen plantings be amended to read
follows:
Sec. 21- 7 5 .
and yard
and provide as
Area, frontage and yard regulations; se~eeft
~~aft~~fi~s.
There are no area, frontage and yard regulations in a
B-3 District, except for off-street parking which shall be in
accordance with the provisions of Article XV.
Wfieft-aðe~~~fi~-afiy-~es~àeft~~a~-à~s~~~e~-se~eefi
~~aft~~fi~-aftà-a-æ~ft~æeæ-ya~à-ef-~efi-fee~-sfia~:I:-ðe-~~ev~àeà-a~efi~
r---
.~
"...-
l
3
December 18, 1984
~fie-~fe~ef~y-!iAe.
12. That a new article, Article XVII.l, Screening and
buffering, be enacted to read and provide as follows:
Article XVII. 1 Screening and Buffering
Sec. 21-132-1. Intent.
I
a. The intent of this article is to set minimum
standards that reduce common conflicts associated with
incompatible adjacent land uses and that protect the natural
boundaries among properties. The standards seek to promote
visual harmony, reduce noise, divert emissions, restrict passage,
and enhance the natural environment - thereby providing for a
compatible mix of otherwise conflicting land uses.
b. The requirements of this article are intended to
encourage, not hamper, innovation in landscape and architectural
design and shall be administered with reasonable consideration
given this objective.
Sec. 21-132-2. Administration.
a. The provisions of this article shall apply to all
building site developments that are subject to site plan review
in Article XXI Site Plan.
b. In addition to the site plan requirements listed in
Article XXI, screening and buffering specifications shall be
submitted. The plan shall explicitly describe changes to the
existing groundcover, landscape improvements, buffer yards,
screens, and the physical design relationship of the building
site to surrounding properties. Required planting shall be
conducted within the beginning of the first opportune planting
season following approval of final development plans but may be
coordinated with construction scheduling.
I
c. All lawfully non-conforming uses are exempt from
these requirements until non-conforming status is terminated, as
provided in Article XIV Non-Conforming Use.
d. Standards iInposed by conditional rezoning shall take
precedence over the provisions of this article.
e. All property boundaries which adjoin the limits of
another local government jurisdiction shall comply with the
provisions of this article.
f. Administrative determinations of the requirements of
this article are subject to appeal to the Board of Zoning
Appeals, as provided in Section 21-174 part (a).
Sec. 21-132-3. Modification or waiver.
I
The screening and planting requirements of this article
shall be applied equally to all similarly-classified and situated
properties but may be modified or waived in certain cases where a
building site is subject to any of the following circumstances,
as determined by the Director of Planning:
a. Natural land characteristics would achieve the same
intent of this article;
~
~
~
December 18, 1984
~..t...> "~i 4.
uO .
b. Innovative landscape or architectural design is
employed to achieve an equivalent screening and buffering effect.
Sec. 21-133-4. General Standards.
I
a. Building site shall refer to the lot on which these
screening and buffering requirements are to be applied.
b. Screening shall refer to the construction of a
visually opaque, physical barrier of specified height within a
required buffer yard.
1. Screening materials shall be continuously
maintained, present an attractive exterior
appearance, and be of durable construction.
2. Unless otherwise noted, acceptable screening
materials include wood stockade fences, decorative
masonry walls, brick walls, and earth berms.
3. All refuse service and outdoor storage areas on
townhouse and multi-family residential, commercial,
and industrial sites shall be screened from
surrounding views.
4. Location of screening shall not obstruct the
visibility of traffic circulation.
I
c. Planting shall refer to the preservation of existing
vegetation or planting of new growth within a required buffer
yard as specified.
1. Where on-center spacing of new plantings is not
specified, the planting may be irregularly dispersed
throughout the buffer yard yet shall be organized to
maximize the screening and buffering objectives.
2. At time of planting, all new evergreen trees
shall have a minimum height of five feet and all new
deciduous trees shall have a minimum caliper of one
inch as defined by the American Association of
Nurserymen.
3. Where required, each large deciduous tree shall
have an ultimate height of 50 feet or greater, and
one shall be planted for each 30 linear feet of
buffer yard.
4. Where required, each large evergreen tree shall
have an ultimate height of 50 feet or greater, and
one shall be planted for each 20 linear feet of
buffer yard.
I
5. Where required, each small evergreen tree shall
have an ultimate height of 15 feet or greater, and
one shall be planted for each 15 linear feet of
buffer yard.
6. Where required, all evergreen shrubs shall have
an ultimate height of six feet or greater, be at
least 18 inches at time of planting, and be planted
5 feet on center or less.
7. Where a parking lot is adjacent to a public
street right-of-way, one small evergreen shrub of
-
~
~
185
December 18, 1984
three feet ultimate height and 18 inches at time of
planting, planted for each five feet of linear
distance, and one small or large deciduous or
evergreen tree planted for 30 feet of linear
distance shall be provided along the parking lot
perimeter. All plantings shall be continuously
maintained, shall not interfere with the use of
adjoining properties, and shall not obstruct the
visibility of traffic circulation.
I
d. Buffer yard shall refer to a landscaped strip of
specified width along certain segments of the building site
perimeter.
1. The buffer yard shall be reserved solely for
screening and plantings, no driveways (except where
necessary for safe access), parking areas, nor
building structures shall be permitted.
2. The amount of required buffer yard shall not be
more than 10 percent of the total building site
area, but in such case that the buffer yard is
reduced, the amount of planting and screening shall
be proportionately increased.
Sec. 21-132-5. Table of requirements.
The required types of screening, buffer yards, and
plantings for a building site are established by the land use
intensity of adjoining properties. To find the requirement, read
across the table to the land use intensity class of the building
site, and read down the table to the class of the adjoining
property. Refer to the keys in Sections 21-132-6 and 7 for an
interpretation of the minimum standards.
I
Land Use Intensity
Building Site
Adjoining
Site III IV V VI VII
I A B B C D
II B C C D E
III C C D E
IV ~ E
~
Sec. 21-132-6. Key of land use intensity classes.
a. The intensity of land use is identified according to
the following key:
I
Class I
All agriculture and related uses permitted in the A-I
and R-E Districts and all public park, open space, and
recreation uses permitted in any District.
Class II
Single family dwelling permitted in the A-I, R-E, R-l,
R-2, and R-3 Districts.
-----
~
1
3ðô
December 18, 1984
I
Class III
Two-family dwelling, townhouse, multi-family dwelling,
and condominium dwelling permitted in the A-I, R-2, R-3,
R-5, R-6, and B-1 Districts.
Class IV
Mobile home park permitted in the R-4 District.
Class V
All institutional and commercial uses permitted in the
A-I and in any residential district and all uses
permitted in the B-1 District.
Class VI
All uses permitted in the B-2 and B-3 Districts that are
not permitted in a lower District.
Class VII
All uses permitted in the M-l, M-2 and M-3 Districts
that are not permitted in a lower District.
b. The class of vacant and non-conforming properties
shall be determined by the predominant use of the zoning
classification, e.g. a non-conforming business or vacant property
in the R-l District is a Class II land.
I
c. The class of properties located in another local
government jurisdiction shall be determined by the closest
related land use that is listed in this key.
Sec. 21-132-7. Key of Screening and Buffering Types.
a. The optional types of required screening, buffer
yard, and plantings are keyed according to the descriptions which
follows:
Type A
1. Option 1:
-4 foot screening
2. Option 2:
-7 foot buffer yard
-one row of evergreen shrubs
Type B
1. Option 1:
-4 foot screening
-7 foot buffer yard
-small evergreen trees
I
2. Option 2:
-15 foot buffer yard
-small evergreen trees and one row of evergreen
shrubs
Type C
1. Option 1:
-6 foot screening
-15 foot buffer yard
-small evergreen trees
2. Option 2:
-25 foot buffer yard
-small evergreen trees and one row of evergreen
shrubs
-----
~
~
"
:. "'. .. .,~ r
:") ()
,¡¡
December 18, 1984
Type D
1. Option 1:
-6 foot screening
-25 foot buffer yard
-large evergreen trees and small evergreen trees
2. Option 2:
-35 foot buffer yard
-large evergreen trees, small evergreen trees, and
one row of evergreen shrubs
I
Type E
1. Option 1:
-8 foot screening
-35 foot buffer yard
-large deciduous trees and large evergreen trees
2. Option 2:
-50 feet buffer yard
-large deciduous trees, large evergreen trees, small
evergreen trees, and one row of small evergreen
shrubs
The provisions of the ordinance shall become effective
on January 1, 1985.
On motion of Supervisor Minter and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Brittle, Minter, McGraw, and Nickens.
I
NAYS: None
IN RE: APPOINTMENTS
Chairman Nickens nominated Ms. Carolyn V. Pence, 1826
Cranwell Drive, Vinton, Virginia, 24179, for the Library Board.
Supervisor Minter nominated Mr. Leo Trenor, 543 Petty
Avenue, NE, Roanoke, Virginia, to the Management Advisory Counci.
to represent Retail Management.
Supervisor Brittle nominated Mr. William H. Mistele,
1309 Biscayne Road, Roanoke, Virginia to the Management Advisory
Council.
Supervisor McGraw nominated Mr. Douglas Hale, 443
I
Ingall Boulevard, Salem, Virginia, to the Management Advisory
Council to represent General Management.
Supervisor McGraw nominated Mr. Brendan Wilkinson,
Route 1, Box 70-B, Salem, Virginia, to the Management Advisory
Council to represent Engineering.
-
~
88ð
December 18, 1984
Supervisor Brittle moved to approve all nominations.
The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
I
IN RE:
ADJOURNMENT
Supervisor Minter moved to adjourn until 9:00 a.m. on
Wednesday, December 19, 1985, at the Roanoke County
Administration Center to consider going into Executive Session
pursuant to the Code of Virginia, 1950 as amended,
Section 2.1-344(a), (1), (2), (4), and (6). The motion carried
by a unanimous voice vote.
I
~
li
~
I
\",
~
~
~
~
\
\.
\
'\
~.
'\',,\
\.
'\.
\\ ~