6/22/1982 - Regular
~
6-22-&2
522
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Salem-Roanoke County Civic Center
Salem, Virginia
June 22, 1982
I
The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day
in open session at the Salem-Roanoke County Civic Center in Salem,
Virginia, this being the fourth Tuesday and the second regular meeting
of the month of June, 1982.
Present: Chairman Edward C. Park, Jr.; Vice Chairman Athena E. Burton;
Supervisors May W. Johnson, Gary James Minter, and Robert E.
Myers.
Absent:
None
IN RE:
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Park at 3:10 p.m.
Vice Chairman Burton immediately moved to go into executive session to
I
discuss personnel, real estate, and legal matters, pursuant to Section
2.l-344(a) (1), (2), and (6) of the Code of Virginia. Her motion was
adopted by a unanimous voice vote.
At 5:40 p.m. Supervisor Myers moved to return to open session;
his motion was adopted by a unanimous voice vote. Supervisor Hyers then
I
!
I immediately moved to recess for dinner; his motion was unanimously
i
!
I adopted.
I
I
I
I At 6:20 p.m. Supervisor Minter moved to return to open session;
I
I his motion was adopted by a unanimous voice vote.
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
!
,
IN RE:
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Park called the meeting to order at 6:25 p.m. Supervisor
Minter immediately moved to go into executive session to discuss personnel,
real estate, and legal matters, pursuant to Section 2.l-344(a) (1), (2),
i
!
and (6) of the Code of Virginia. His motion was adopted by a unanimous
I
voice yote.
~
~
-" '.
6-22-82
~~~
At 7:00 p.m. Supervisor Minter moved to return to regular
session and the motion was adopted by a unanimous voice vote.
Chairman Park advised those present that the Supervisors had
I
been meeting since 3:00 p.m. and that the meeting had already been called
to order.
IN RE:
INVOCATION/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
John M. Chambliss, Jr., Roanoke County Director of Finance,
offered the invocation; the pledge of allegiance to the flag was then
recited in unison by all present.
IN RE:
ITEMS SUBMITTED FOR INFORMATION
Supervisor l1inter moved that the report on Referrals to the
Planning Commission, the Summary of Appropriations from the General
Operating Fund through June 8, 1982, the list of Accounts Paid during
April, 1982, and the letter from A. S. Brown, State Secondary Roads
I
voice vote.
IN RE:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Supervisor Johnson moved that the minutes of the regular Board
meeting held May 25, 1982, and of the Special Board meeting held June 2,
1982, be approved. Her motion was adopted by a unanimous voice vote.
IN RE:
PUBLIC HEARINGS
i
I
I
I
I
~
APPLICATION OF BOBBY W. PARRISH, SR. AND JEANNE
M. PARRISH FOR A SPECIAL EXCEPTION PERMIT TO
PARK A 110BILE HOME ON A I-ACRE TRACT LOCATED
ABOUT 400 FEET SOUTH FROM THE DEAD END OF STATE
ROUTE 603 IN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
* I
*
*
* APPROVED
*
Mr. and Mrs. Parrish were present for this public hearing; no
one was present in opposition. Supervisor l1yers moved that their request
be approved, subject to the provisions of the County Zoning Ordinance as
~
~
6-22-82
524
it pertains to mobile homes. His motion was adopted by the following
recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Burton, Myers, Minter, Johnson, and Park.
I
NAYS:
None
APPLICATION OF PAUL W. HICKS FOR A SPECIAL
EXCEPTION PERMIT TO PARK A MOBILE HOME AN
11.5-ACRE TRACT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF STATE
ROUTE 910 ABOUT 1,400 FEET FROM ITS INTER-
SECTION WITH ROUTE 778 IN CATAWBA DISTRICT
*
*
*
* APPROVED
*
Mr. Hicks was present for this public hearing; there was no
opposition. Supervisor Myers moved that the request be approved, subject
to the provisions of the County Zoning Ordinance as it pertains to mobile
homes. His motion was adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Burton, Myers, Minter, Johnson, and Park
NAYS: None
I
APPLICATION OF MARVIN T. TURMAN FOR A SPECIAL *
EXCEPTION PERMIT TO PARK A MOBILE HOME ON A *
l-ACRE TRACT LOCATED ON A PRIVATE ROAD ON THE *
WEST SIDE OF U.S. ROUTE 220 ABOUT 600 FEET *
SOUTH FROM THE INTERSECTION OF ROUTE 220 WITH *
STATE ROUTE 676 IN THE CAVE SPRING DISTRICT *
APPROVED
Mr. Turman was present for this public hearing; there was no
opposition. Supervisor Johnson moved that the request be approved,
subject to the provisions of the County Zoning Ordinance as it pertains
to mobile homes. Her motion was adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Burton, Myers, Minter, Johnson, and Park
NAYS:
None
APPLICATION OF DONALD Z. AND CHRISTINE G.
LOVELACE FOR A SPECIAL EXCEPTION PERMIT TO
PARK A MOBILE HOME ON A 3.38-ACRE TRACT AT
1814 RICHLAND HILLS DRIVE IN THE CATAWBA
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
*
~
ft
*
*
APPROVED
*
I
Mr. and Mrs. Lovelace were present for this public hearing; no
one was present in opposition. Supervisor Myers moved that their request
be approved, subject to the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning
Ordinance as it pertains to mobile homes. His motion was adopted by
AYES:
Supervisors Burton, Myers, Minter, Johnson, and Park
I
I
I-
I
\
i
the following recorded vote:
NAYS:
None
~
6-22-82
~2 ~
I
APPLICATION OF WALLACE M. WALKER FOR A SPECIAL *
EXCEPTION PERMIT TO PARK A MOBILE HOME ON A *
2.l83-ACRE TRACT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF STATE *
ROUTE 622, ABOUT 1.9 MILES FROM ROUTE 311 IN *
THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT *
CONDITIONAL
APPROVAL
Mr. Wallace Walker was present for this public hearing; Mr.
I
William G. Pence was present in opposition. Mr. Pence advised he was
trying to sell his house and that the realtor told him a mobile home in the
vicinity would make the sale hard. Supervisor Myers showed Mr. Pence the
map of the area provided in the Supervisors' agenda packet. Mr. Walker,
Mr. Pence, and about eight other persons opposed to the mobile home
gathered before the Supervisors and discussed the matter. Supervisor Myers
asked those persons opposed if they would withdraw their opposition if the
i
. permit were issued for only a two-year period while Mr. Walker was building
his house, the mobile home to be moved at the end of two years. Most of
the opposition agreed to this suggestion, and Supervisor Myers then moved
that the permit be granted for two years only, and on the condition that
a house be built on the tract. His motion was adopted by the following
I
recorded vote:
I
AYES:
Supervisors Burton, Hyers, Hinter, Johnson, and Park
NAYS:
None
APPLICATION OF ERNEST J. \JALKER FOR A SPECIAL *
EXCEPTION PERMIT TO PARK A l'.fOBILE HOME ON A i~
2.l84-ACRE TRACT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF STATE * CONTINUED TO
ROUTE 622, ABOUT 1.9 MILE FROM ROUTE 311 IN THE * JULY 27, 1982
CATAw~A MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. *
No one was present for this public hearing. Mr. Claude G. Lee,
Secretary to the County Board of Zoning Appeals, advised that upon
investigation of t1r. Walker's application, it was found that he needs to
secure a variance permit from the Board of Zoning Appeals before the
Supervisors consider the request. Mr. Lee asked that this matter be
continued to the next meeting of the Board of Supervisors. Supervisor
I
Myers so moved and his motion was adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Burton, Hyers, Minter, Johnson, and Park
NAYS:
None
,
_I
~
~
6-22-82
526
I
PETITION OF SM.lliEL L. LIONBERGER, JR. AND *
DONALD P. PEERY REQUESTING REZONING FROM *
R-l TO R-3 OF 4.75 ACRES ON THE WEST SIDE OF*
ROUTE 419 AT THE SOUTHEAST END OF BRIDLE *
LANE AND ADJOINING BLOCK 5, SECTION 1 OF *
GLEN HEATHER FARMS IN 1iJINDSOR HILLS DISTRICTi~
TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF A TOWNHOUSE COMPLEX.
CONDITIONAL
APPROVAL
Mr. Lionberger and Mr. Peery were present for this public hearing.
They identified themselves as owners of the land. Mr. Peery advised they
planned to build 39 townhouses and pointed out that the land fronts
mostly along Route 419. He said the townhouses would be a buffer between
the commercial development along 419 and the residential area off 419. He
felt that this project would be the best use for the property and would be
a plus to the surrounding area. Mr. Lionberger asked that their request
be considered on its merits and not on emotional pleas that might be made.
He stated that this use would fit into the character of the surrounding
area and then discussed the traffic flow from the townhouses and its
impact on the 419 traffic. He further stated that projected school
enrollments are declining and that potential children from the townhouses
I
would not create a problem for the school system. He said the sewer
system is adequate to handle the project and water is available. He also
said he and Mr. Peery have agreed to incorporate into their plan a
separate entrance off Route 419 instead of Stoneybrook Drive. Mr. Lion-
berger stated that a traffic safety study has been done which indicated
18.3 per cent of vehicles headed north on 419 make a left turn from Stoney-
brook and that their longest wait was 50 seconds. He said the townhouse
complex would add one additional vehicle every five minutes during daylight
hours. He then showed those present the architects' drawing of the
townhouse exteriors. he said the townhouses would be for sale, not rented.
He outlined the petitioners' development plan and mentioned that pine
trees would be planted to screen the project from the residential R-l area.
I
Mr. Lionberger was asked if the land would be conveyed to the purchasers
of the townhouses; he replied that the townhouses would be sold with land.
He further stated there would be no pool or recreational facilities on the
property, but there would be access to the Sugar Loaf Swim Club facilities.
This concluded the petitioners' presentation.
Three presons had signed forms indicating they wished to speak in
opposition to this petition for rezoning. Chairman Park asked that each 1---
~
P"'"
6<2~G2
i27
of them limit his comments to five minutes. The first opponent was Mr.
Will Estes, spokesman for the Southwest County Civic Association, who
advised they could not support the project. He said citizens in the 419
prea are very concerned that 419 remain a parkway area instead of possibly
being developed like Williamson Road. He requested that the petition for
I
rezoning be denied.
I
I
i
i
I
,
:
f
i
i
I
.
i
!
Ii
Ii
I!
I
I
I
The next speaker was Mr. Jack V. Altizer, who advised he was speaking
on behalf of the Oak Grove Civic League and property owners adjacent to
the proposed project. He said the League and property owners are opposed,
under any terms or conditions, to this particular project and that it
would unduly create traffic congestion on roads that are already hazardous.
He also mentioned that the County Engineer has gone on record against the
proposed access point onto 419. Mr. Altizer's second point was the density
of the area businesses and existing multi-family developments. He said thesl
townhouses would depreciate the value of surrounding houses and there was
the potential for noise problems. l1r. Altizer also mentioned the developers
could give no assurance that the units would not be rented out in the
I
future. His last point was that it is the Supervisors' duty to preserve
continuity and harmonious real estate development; he then asked that this
request not be granted because it would be a signal to other developers
to come in with other developments; he again asked that the petition not
be r,ranted.
Mr. Richard Perdue was the third person to speak in opposition to this
proposed rezoning. He described traffic accidents that have happened in
the vicinity. He also said development in the area is causing a drainage
problem into the existing stream and that pine trees would not be adequate
screening because the land behind the proposed project is terraced.
Supervisor Johnson asked the County Engineer Gene Robertson about erosion.
He replied that this development would increase the runoff into the creek.
I
An unidentified man from the audience showed the Supervisors pictures of
the stream. Supervisor Burton said the project now meets Highway criteria
for runoff into a natural stream. She also advised that in an area zoned
for R-l use, about 29 or 30 dwellings could be built on a tract this size;
l1r. Lionberger said the petitioners' property would accommodate 19 single-
--- family homes. Supervisor Burton then pointed out that under the existing
~t
",
6--22-82
528
zoning classification, all the problems mentioned by those in opposition
to this request would also be created. Supervisor Minter asked what would
happen if the townhouses don't sell, could they be bought up and rented
I
out? Mr. Lionberger said yes, it would not be illegal and there would be
no way to prevent it. Supervisor Burton said she could not understand
why townhouses are considered synonymous with tenements or second-class
housing. She said she wanted to see 419 stay residential and that good
land use practice would be to use multi-family housing of some type as
a buffer between commercial use and single-family housing. She also said
she had talked to the Resident Engineer of the State Highway Department
who said there is less than one-half the accident rate on Stoneybrook
Drive as on other secondary roads.
Mr. Paul Jones of 5106 Stoneybrook Drive told Supervisor Burton
the proposed development would create a bad traffic problem and drainage
problem and that his property would be devalued. Several persons in the
I
audience said increased drainage going into the creek is ruining their
back yards. Supervisor Burton asked County Real Estate Assessor Andrew
E. Clingenpeel what the effect has been of townhouses on single-family
homes; he replied he has not been able to measure any adverse effect,
that sale prices have not shown any adverse effect. Chairman Park had
to ask the audience to hold down the noise and clapping.
Mr. William Brenton, Sugar Loaf Farms, asked Supervisor Burton about
her campaign pledge of a comprehensive, updated land use plan. She replied
the plan has not been done. Mr. Brenton suggested this project would be
spot zoning. Mr. Jim Phillips, who said he had been in real estate since
1973, said high-density housing does lower surrounding residential
property values. Mr. Roger Lorden (4390 Sheldon Drive), representing the
Cresthill Civic League, asked all opposed to the project to stand; about
I
70 or 80 persons in the audience stood. Supervisor Burton stated this
would be the most difficult decision she would have to make this year, but
that she must think of her responsibility to the citizens of Roanoke County,
not just this area. She said she was sorry that this type of development
was perceived as detrimental, but that changing times must be recognized and
accepted. As she started to make a motion, she was interrupted by howard
-
~
"...-
529
f
6-22--02
,
." ..
Worthy from the Farmingdale area who asked the five Board members if they
didn't think the majority of the people ,lere giving an indication of how
they want this rezoning to go. Supervisor Burton said she lives in the
area immediately adjacent to where this project would go; she has talked
to her neighbors and they say they do not feel this is a problem and
I
prefer this kind of development to leaving land vacant so that it might
be used for commercial development in the future. It was also felt that
the most desirable buffer would be townhouses, not condominiums or apart-
ments.
Supervisor ~1inter thanked both sides for their good presentations
and told Supervisor Burton he admired her courage, but he did not agree with
her viewpoint. Supervisor Burton then moved approval of the requested
rezoning, with the proffered conditions that the townhouses will be for
sale only, not for rent, and that an access road to Route 419 will be
I.
I
Ii
Ii
constructed according to plans Mr. Lionberger had presented to the Board.
FINAL ORDER
I
NOlJ, T}lliREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned tract of
I,
land, more particularly described below, be rezoned from Residential
District R-l to Residential District R-3.
BEGINNING at a point on the westerly side of Virginia
Highway Route No. 419, said point being the northeasterly
corner of the property of lJ. L. and Nellie L. Griffith;
thence S. 580 32' W. 362.00 feet to a point; thence N.
480 37' 40" l-J. 125.09 feet to a point; thence N. 50 57'
E. 54 feet to a point; thence N. 720 38' W. 129.69 feet
to a point; thence N. 450 21' 30" E. 183.13 feet to an
iron pin; thence N. 440 38' 30" l-J. 110.00 feet to an iron
pin; thence N. 450 21' 30" z. 429.52 feet to a concrete
highway monument; thence S. 190 23' 20" E. 113.74 feet
to a concrete highway monuwent; thence S. 170 48' E.
407.08 feet to the place of BEGINNING and being 4.299
acres as shown on survey made for Sam Lionberger, Jr. and
Don Peery, dated January 17, 1974, by David Dick and
Associates, Engineers and Surveyors, a copy of which is
attached hereto and made a part hereof; and
BEING a part of the same property conveyed to the party of
the first part by deed dated February 27, 1937, of record
in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the County
of Roanoke, Virginia in Deed Book 245, Page 41.
I
There is reserved herein unto the party of the first part
the 50 foot roadway easement for purposes of ingress and egress
from Bridle Lane as shown on the aforesaid survey.
PA~CEL B
-
BEGINNING at an iron pin on the southwesterly side of
~ .
... ,
~
6-22-82
530
..
I
Bridle Lane 150.0 feet to point of intersection of
Stoneybrook Drive, said point being on the northwesterly
side of a 50 foot road easement; thence along the
westerly side of a 50 foot road easement S. 440 38'
30" E. 110.00 feet to an iron pin; thence S. 450 21'
30" H. passing an iron pin on line 37.6 feet from corner
a total distance of 183.13 feet to a point; thence N.
720 38' H. 31.31 feet to a point; thence N. 240 00'
H. 88.00 feet to a point, thence N. 450 21' 30" E.
166.80 feet to the place of BEGINNING and containing
0.466 acre as shown on survey made for Sam Lionberger,
Jr. and Don Perry by David Dick and Associates, Engineers
and Surveyors, dated January 17, 1974, of record in the
Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of
Roanoke, Virginia, in Deed Book 995, Page 554; and
BEING a part of the same property conveyed to Don P. Perry
and Samuel L. Lionberger, Jr. by deed dated February 7, 1978,
and intended to be recorded in the Clerk's Office of
the Circuit Court of the City of Roanoke, Virginia, just
prior to this Deed of Trust.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to
the County Planner and that he be and hereby is directed to reflect
that change on the official zoning maps of the County.
PROFFER OF CONDITIONS
I
1. The townhouse units will be for sale only.
2. Approval to construct an entrance to Route 419 from the
subject property to be obtained by owners.
Adopted on the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Burton, Myers, Johnson and Park
NAYS:
Supervisor Minter
At the end of this public hearing, Chairman Park called a brief
recess of no longer than ten minutes.
IN RE:
PUBLIC HEARING TO RE-ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 3128 CONCERNING
HATER IMPOUNDMENT
Supervisor Minter moved to re-adopt Ordinance No. 3128 which had
I
previously been adopted as an emergency measure on May 3, 1982.
ORDINANCE NO. 3128 ADOPTING A NEH CHAPTER OF THE ROANOKE
COUNTY CODE TO BE DESIGNATED CHAPTER 8.3 ENTITLED HATER
IMPOUNDMENT SAFETY CODE TO CONTAIN PROVISIONS FOR RIGHT OF
ENTRY, INSPECTION OF WATER IMPOUNDHENT FACILITY AND STRUCTURES,
PROVIDING FOR REMOVAL AND/OR REPAIR UPON DETERHINATION OF
I~1MINENT DANGER, AND PROVIDING FOR RECOVERY OF COST BY THE
COUNTY.
-
I
I
II~
"...-
531
6-22-82
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County as
follows:
1. That there be, and there hereby is, adopted a new Chapter of
the Roanoke County Code to be designated Chapter 8.3 entitled Water
Impoundment Safety Code to read and provide as follows:
I
CEAPTER 8.3
WATER IMPOUNDHENT SAFETY CODE
Section 8.3:1 Definitions. - As used in this code the following
words shall have the meanings respectively ascribed thereto:
1. "Board" means the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County.
2. "Administrator" means the Roanoke County Administrator or his
duly appointed designee.
3. "Impounding structure" means any structure or device, whether a
dam across a watercourse or other structure outside a watercourse, used
or to be used to retain or store waters or other materials. The term
"impounding structure" shall not include: (i) dams licensed by the State
Corporation Commission that are subject to a safety inspection program;
(ii) dams owned or licensed by the United States government; (iii) dams
constructed, maintained or operated primarily for agricultural purposes
which are less than fifteen (15) feet in height or which create a
maximum i~poundment s~aller than twenty-five (25) acre-feet; (iv) water
or silt retaining dams approved pursuant to Section 45.1222 of the Code
of Virginia; (v) obstructions in a canal used to raise or lower water;
(vi) nonasricultural dams which are less than fifteen (15) feet in
height or which create a maximum impoundment smaller than twenty-five
(25) acre-feet; or (vii) dams not more than six feet in height regardless
of storage capacity or with a storage capacity of not more than ten (10)
acre-feet regardless of height.
I
4. "Height" means the structural height of an impounding structure
which is defined as the vertical distance from the natural bed of the
stream or watercourse measured at the downstream toe of the impounding
structure to the top of the impounding structure.
5. "Hatercourse" means a natural channel having a well-defined bed
and banks and in which water flows when it normally does flow.
6. "Owner" means the owner of the land on which an impounding
structure is situated, the holder of an ease~ent permitting the construction
of an impounding structure and any person or entity responsible for
maintaining an impounding structure, either by agreement or otherwise.
Section 8.3:2 Promulgation of Rules and Regulations by the Board.
The Board shall promulgate all necessary rules and regulations no less
stringent than those promulgated by the State Water Control Board to
ensure that impounding structures in the County are properly and safely
constructed, maintained, repaired, and operated.
I
-
Section 8.3:3 County Impoundment Safety Technical Advisory Committee.
-The Board shall establish a County I~poundment Safety Technical Advisory
Committee to advise the Board upon i~lryOund~ents within Roanoke County. The
County Impoundment Safety Technical Advisory Committee created and appointed
by the Board shall consist of at least five (5) persons qualified by
education, experience and professional training in the design, construction,
maintenance, repair and safety characteristics of water impoundment structurlls
or devices. The County Impoundment Safety Technical Advisory Committee
~I
~
6-22-82
532
.
shall provide both technical review, and make recommendations to the
Board pursuant to any of the provisions of this code.
I
Section 8.3:4 Safety Inspections. -No one shall have a right to
maintain an impoundment structure which unreasonable threatens the life
or property of another. The Board upon recommendation of the Administrator
or any other duly authorized State or Federal agency shall cause safety
inspections, not to exceed that of a phase 1 inspection report as establishe
by the u.S. Army Corps of Engineers, to be made of impounding structures
on such schedule as it deems appropriate, the time of the initial inspection
and the frequency of reinspection shall be established depending on such
factors as the condition of the structure and its size, type, location
and downstream hazard potential. The owners of impounding structures
found to have deficiencies which could threaten life or property if
uncorrected, shall take the corrective actions, which may include a
phase II inspection report as established by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, needed to remove such deficiencies within a reasonable time.
I
Section 8.3:5 Unsafe Impounding Structures Presenting Imminent
Danger. -When the Administrator or any other State or Federal agency
charged with'such responsibility, finds an unsafe impounding structure
constituting an imminent danger to life or property, the Administrator
shall immediately notify the Board and confer with the owner. The owner
of an impounding structure found to constitute an imminent danger to
life or property shall take immediate corrective action, which corrective
action shall commence no later than ten (10) calendar days following
written notification of such unsafe condition. If the owner does not
take appropriate and timely action to correct the danger found, the
Chairman of the Board, or the ViceChairman in the Chairman's absence
shall have the authority to authorize the Administrator to take immediate
appropriate action, without the necessity for a hearing, to remove the
imminent danger. The County Attorney shall bring an action against the
owner of the impounding structure for the County's expenses in and about
removing the imminent danger. There shall be a lien upon the owner's
real estate for the County's expenses in and about removing the iIllTIinent
danger. The owner may avoid the County's costs,and recover any damages,
upon proving that the impounding structure was known to be safe at the
time such action was taken, and that the owner had provided or offered
to immediately provide such proof to the Administrator before the action
complained of was taken. Nothing herein shall in any way limit any
authority existing under the Emergency Services and Disaster Law of
1973, Chapter 3.2 of Title 44 of the Code of Virginia.
I
Section 8.3:6 Unsafe Impounding Structures Presenting Nonimminent
Danger. -A. Within a reasonable time after completion of a safety
inspection of an impounding structure authorized by Section 8.3:4
of this Code, the Administrator shall issue a report to the owner of the
impounding structure containing findings and recommendations for correction
of deficiencies, if any, which could threaten life or property if uncorrectec
Owners who have been issued a report containing recommendations for
correction of deficiencies shall undertake to implement the recommendations
contained in the report. If an owner fails or refuses to commence or
diligently prosecute the implementation of recommendations for correction
of deficiencies according to the schedule of implementation contained in
an issued report, the Administrator shall have the authority to issue an
administrative order directing the owner to commence implementation and
completion of such recommendations according to the schedule contained
in the report with modifications as appropriate. Within thirty (30)
days after being served by personal service or by certified mail with a
copy of an order issued pursuant to this section, any owner shall have
the right to petition the Board for a hearing. A timely filed petition,
within the thirty (30) day period, shall stay the effect of the administrati, ~
order.
The hearing shall be conducted before the Board or a majority of
the members thereof. The Board shall have the authority to affirm,
modify, amend, or cancel such administrative order. Any owner aggrieved
by a decision of the Board after a hearing herein provided shall have
-
~
533'
6-22-82
the right to appeal such final Board decision to the Circuit Court
having jurisdiction in Roanoke County within thirty (30) days following
such decision.
B. The provisions of paragraph A of this section notwithstanding,
if in the opinion of the Administrator, changed circumstances justify
reclassifying the deficiencies of an impounding structure after issuance
of the report as an imminent danger to life or property, the Administra-
tor may proceed directly under Section 8.3:5 of this Code for enforce-
ment of his order, and the owner shall have the opportunity to contest
the factual basis upon which the administrative order was issued.
I
Section 8.3:7 Right of Entry - The Board and its agents and employees
shall have the right to enter any property upon consent of the owner or
custodian to perform such inspections and tests or to take such other
actions as it deems necessary to fulfill its responsibilities under this
chapter. If entry is denied, the Board may apply to any magistrate
whose territorial jurisdiction encompasses the property to be inspected
or entered for a warrant authorizing such investigation tests, or other
actions. Such warrant shall issue if the magistrate finds probably
cause to believe that there is an impounding structure on such property
which is not known to be safe.
Section 8.3:8 Impounding Structure Safety Coordination. - The
Administrator shall coordinate all impoundment safety activities in the
County, which shall include, but not be limited to: (1) the maintenance
of an inventory of all impoundment structures, and of all other similar
structures whether or not regulated under this chapter to the extent the
Board deems necessary; (ii) the maintenance of a repository for record
drawings of all such structures to the extent the Board deems necessary;
(iii) the maintenance of an inventory of safety inspection reports by
whomever made for each such structure to the extent the Board deems
necessary; and (iv) the maintenance of a secondary repository for all
impoundment structure safety emergency action plans which are primarily
filed with the Office of the Coordinator of Fire and Emergency Services.
The Board shall cause to be provided technical assistance in the preparation,
updating, and execution of such plans. It shall cause to be established
uniform maintenance of records requirements and uniform inspection
standards to be applied to all impounding structures in the County, and
to be recommended for all other similar structures. It may cause to be
inspected state owned or state licensed impounding structures on a cost
reimbursable basis at the request of the state agency owning the state
owned impounding structure or of the licensor of the state licensed
impounding structure.
I
Section 8.3:9 Enforcement. - Any person or legal entity failing or
refusing to comply with an order issued pursuant to this chapter may be
compelled in a proceeding instituted in any appropriate court by the
Board to obey the same, and the court shall require the owner to comply
therewith.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Burton, Myers, Minter, Johnson and Park
NAYS:
None
IN RE:
ORDINANCE NO. 3161 ESTABLISHING OR RE-ESTABLISHING THE
BOUNDARY LINES OF CERTAIN PRECINCTS IN ROANOKE
COUNTY AND PROVIDING FOR THE DESIGNATION OF VOTING
OR POLLING PLACES FOR THE PRECINCTS SO ESTABLISHED
OR RE-ESTABLISHED; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
FOR SUCH CHANGES.
I
.,
6-22-82
534
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
~V~rginia, as follows:
1. That there having been established by the General Assembly of
I
Virginia certain Senatorial Districts to-wit; the 21st and 22nd Senatorial
Districts and certain House of Delegates Districts to-wit; the 14th and
15th House of Delegates Districts within Roanoke County, which said
several districts crossover existing precinct lines in Roanoke County;
and that certain existing precincts in Roanoke County having been determined
to contain a greater number of registered voters than can be readily
accommodated at a polling place, by reason of all such considerations it
is necessary that certain voting precincts in Roanoke County be established
or re-established and that a voting place be established for each such
precinct, all of which is more specifically set forth in the following
words and phrases, to-wit:
(a)
GLENVAR PRECINCT
I
BEGINNING at a point on the Roanoke-Montgomery County line where U.S.
81 intersects that line; thence with the said U.S. Interstate 81 in
a northeasterly direction to its intersection with State Secondary Route
640; thence to the south right-of-way line of the said Interstate 81 to
the western most corner of the City of Salem corporate line; thence in a
generally northeasterly direction with the said City of Salem corporate
line to a point 700 feet northeasterly of Route 619; thence leaving the
said corporate line of the City of Salem and in a northwesterly direction
approximately 1,100 feet to where Dry Branch forks into an easterly and
westerly fork; thence with the easterly fork of the said Dry Branch as
it meanders in generally a northwesterly direction to where this branch
or hollow intersects a fire trail at the topographic crest of Fort Lewis
Mountain, the said branch or hollow crosses the boundary of the Haven
State Game Refuge and is approximately 8,600 feet southwesterly of its
eastern most corner; thence with the topographic crest of Fort Lewis
Mountain and generally a southwesterly direction to its intersection
with the Roanoke-Montgomexy County line; thence with the said Roanoke-
Montgomery County corporate line in a southeasterly direction to the
place of BEGINNING.
Catawba Magisterial District
Voting Place - Glenvar Elementary School
I
(b)
PETERS CREEK PRECINCT
BEGINNING at a point on Route 628 (Woodhaven Road) where the said
Route 628 crosses the western right-of-way line of U.S. Route 581;
thence north with the west right-of-way line of Interstate 581 crossing
Interstate Route 81 and the intersection of Route 81 service road (Loch
Haven Drive) to the intersection of the road to Loch Haven Country Club;
thence north with the road to Loch Haven Country Club to State Secondary
Route 1404; thence in a westerly direction with State Secondary Route
1404 to the City of Roanoke Water Department west property line; thence
north with a City of Roanoke Water Department west property line to the
topographic crest of Brushy Mountain; thence with the topgraphic crest
~
r
I
fi35'
6-22-82
:
---
of Brushy Mountain in a southwesterly direction crossing Masons Creek to
the intersection of Virginia Route 311 and State Secondary Route 683;
thence north with Virginia Route 311 to the topographic crest of Fort
Lewis Mountain; thence leaving Virginia Route 311 and with the topographic
crest of Fort Lewis Mountain in a northwesterly direction approximately
13,000 feet intersecting a hollow which is the east fork of Dry Branch
and an existing fire trail; thence with the hollow which is the east
fork of Dry Branch in a southeasterly direction as it meanders to a
point where Dry Branch divides into an east and west fork at approximately
1,100 feet northeasterly of the south right-of-way of U.S. Interstate
81; thence leaving the creek in a southerly direction to a point on the
south right-of-way line of U.S. Interstate 81 the said point being
further identified as being approximately 700 feet northeasterly fromthe
intersection of the said U.S. Interstate Route 81 with State Secondary
Route 619, said point further being on the north corporate line of the
City of Salem; thence with the north corporate line of the City of Salem
and in a generally northeasterly direction as it meanders and then
continuing with the north corporate line of the City of Roanoke as it
meanders to a point where Peters Creek Road and State Secondary Route
1524 (North Lakes Drive) intersect; thence with North Lakes Drive in a
northwesterly direction to its intersection with Northside Drive; thence
with Northside Drive in a southwesterly direction to its intersection
with Wippledale Avenue; thence with Wippledale Avenue in a northwesterly
direction as it meanders to its intersection with North Lakes Drive;
thence with North Lakes Drive in a westerly direction to its intersection
with State Secondary Route 629 (Greenridge Road); thence northwesterly
with Greenridge Road to its intersection with State Secondary Route 628
(Woodhaven Road); thence in a northeasterly direction with Woodhaven
Road to the point of BEGINNING.
I
Catawba Magisterial District
I
Voting Place- Glen Cove School
(c)
GREEN HILL PRECINCT
BEGINNING at a point on U.S. Interstate 81 at its intersection with
Secondary Route 640 and opposite and north of the Salem corporate limits;
thence south to the west corporate line of the City of Salem; thence
with the west corporate line of the City of Salem in a southerly direction
and with the south corporate line of the City of Salem in an easterly
and southerly direction to a point on the corporate line of the City of
Salem at a point where the said line turns from southeast to northeast
at the corner of the Hidden Valley Country Club; thence with a line to a
point where a gas transmission line crosses Barnhart Creek; thence with
the said gas transmission line in a southwesterly direction to the crest
of 12 O'clock Knob and with the crest of Poor Mountain, the dividing
line between Catawba and the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, in a
westerly and southwesterly direction to Montgomery-Roanoke County line;
thence with the Montgomery-Roanoke County line in a northerly direction
to U.S. Interstate 81; thence in a northeasterly direction with U.S.
Interstate 81 to the point of BEGINNING.
!
;
.
:
Catawba Magisterial District
Voting Place - Fort Lewis Fire Station
I
~)
HOLLINS PRECINCT
.
.
BEGINNING at the southerly right-of-way of Interstate 81 and the
Botetourt-Roanoke County line; thence with the southerly right-of-way of
Interstate 81 in a westerly direction to Deer Branch Creek; thence south
with Deer Branch Creek as it meanders to Virginia Route 117 (Peters
Creek Road); thence easterly with Peters Creek Road to its intersection
with Route 11 (Williamson Road); thence in a south easterly direction
with Route 11 (Williamson Road) to its intersection with State Secondary
Route 1821 (Clubhouse Drive); thence in a southeasterly direction with
.
I,
~
6-22-82
536
I
Clubhouse Drive extended until it intersects the east fork of Carvins
Creek; thence northeasterly with Carvins Creek as it meanders until it
intersects Virginia Primary Route 115 (Plantation Road); thence in a
northwesterly direction with Primary Route 115 (Plantation Road) until
it intersects Route 11 (Williamson Road); thence in an easterly direction
with Route 11 (Williamson Road) until it intersects the Roanoke-Botetourt
County line; thence with the Roanoke-Botetourt County line in a northwesterl
direction to the point of BEGINNING.
Hollins Magisterial District
Voting Place - Hollins Library
(e)
PLANTATION PRECINCT
I
BEGINNINGat a point where Route 11 (Williamson Road) intersects
Route 1821 (Clubhouse Drive); thence southeasterly with Route 11 (Williamson
Road) until it intersects Secondary Route 623 (Florist Rd); thence in a
southeasterly direction with Secondary Route 623 (Florist Road) until it
intersects the north corporate line of the City of Roanoke; thence in an
easterly direction with the north corporate line of the City of Roanoke
until it intersects Virginia Primary Route 115 (Plantation Road); thence
in a northwesterly direction with Virginia Primary Route 115 (Plantation
Road) to a point where the said road intersects the east fork of Carvins
Creek; thence with the east fork of Carvins Creek in a southewesterly
direction as it meanders to a point opposit the center line extended of
Secondary Route 1821 (Clubhouse Drive); thence northwesterly with the
center line of Secondary Route 1821 (Clubhouse Drive) to Secondary Route
1821; thence in a westerly direction with Secondary Route 1821 (Clubhouse
Drive) to its intersection with U.S. Route 11 (Williamson Road) the
place of BEGINNING.
Hollins Magisterial District
Voting Place - Roanoke Valley Christian School
(f)
MONTEREY PRECINCT
BEGINNING at a point on the north corporate line of the City of
Roanoke where the Shenandoah Division of the Norfolk and Southern Railroad
tracks exit the City of Roanoke; thence in a northeasterly direction
with the tracks of the Norfolk and Southern to a point where the said
tracks cross the Roanoke-Botetourt County line; thence in a northwesterly
direction with the Roanoke-Botetourt County line to a point where it
crosses U.S. Primary Route 11; thence in a westerly direction with U.S.
Primary Route 11 to its intersection with Virginia Primary Route 115
(Plantation Road); thence southwesterly with State Primary Route U5
(Plantation Road) to a point where it intersects the north corporate
line of the City of Roanoke; thence northeasterly with the corporate
line of the City of Roanoke to the point of BEGINNING.
Hollins Magisterial District
I
Voting Place - Mountain View School
(g)
READ MOUNTAIN PRECINCT
BEGINNING at a point on the north corporate line of the City of
Roanoke where the Norfolk and Southern Shenandoah Division tracks exit
the City and thence northeasterly with the Norfolk and Southern tracks
to a point where the said tracks cross the Roanoke-Botetourt County
line; thence southeasterly with the said Roanoke-Botetourt County line
to the crest of Read Mountain; thence south westerly with the crest of
Read Mountain and the crest of Read Mountain extended until it intersects
the City of Roanoke corporate line at Secondary Route 611 (Read Mountain
~
P"'"
537
6-22-82
Road); thence westerly with the corporate line of the City of Roanoke as
it meanders to the point of BEGINNING.
Hollins Magisterial District
Voting Place - Patterson Memorial Brethren Church
(h)
WINDSOR HILLS PRECINCT
I
BEGINNING at a point in the City of Roanoke Corporate line where
Virginia Primary Route 419 intersects Glen Heather Drive; thence easterly
with the corporate line of the City of Roanoke to a point where the said
corporate line intersects Mud Lick Creek; thence southwesterly with Mud
Lick Creek and the west fork of Mud Lick Creek to a point where it
intersects Secondary Route 1658 (Cresthill Drive); thence westerly with
State Secondary 1658 (Cresthill Drive) to its intersection with State
Secondary Route 1647 (Old McVitty Road); thence southwesterly to a
point where Mud Lick Creek intersects Virginia Primary Route 419; thence
northwesterly with Virginia Primary Route 419 to the place of BEGINNING.
Windsor Hills Magisterial District
Voting Place - Our Lady of Nazareth Catholic Church
(i)
GARST MILL PRECINCT
BEGINNING at a point on Virginia Primary Route 419 where the west
fork of Mud Lick Creek crosses; thence in a northeasterly direction to
the intersection of State Secondary Route 1659 and State Secondary Route
1658 (Cresthill Drive); thence in an easterly direction with Secondary
Route 1658 (Cresthill Drive) to its intersection with the west fork of
Mud Lick Creek; thence with the west fork of Mud Lick Creek and Mud Lick
Creek as it meanders in a northeasterly direction to the southerly
corporate line of the City of Roanoke; thence with the corporate line of
the City of Roanoke in a northeasterly and southeasterly direction to a
point where it crosses U.S. 221 (Brambleton Avenue); thence with U.S.
221 (Brambleton Avenue) in a southwesterly direction to its intersection
with Virginia Primary Route 419; thence with Virginia Primary Route 419
northwesterly to a point on the property of the Roanoke County Public
Library; thence with the Library property the following courses and
distances: S.580 48' 30" W. 399.76 feet, N. 230 36' W. 307 feet, N. 160
47' 40" lI. 178.26 feet to a point on the south side of Virginia Primary
Route 419; thence with the south side of Virginia Primary Route 419 in a
northwesterly direction to the point of BEGINNING.
I
Windsor Hills Magisterial District
Voting Place - Library Headquarters
(j)
CLEARBROOK PRECINCT
BEGINNING at a point in the City of Roanoke corporate line where
U.S. 220 south exits the City; thence with the southerly boundary of the
City of Roanoke in a northerly direction to a point where it intersects
Secondary Route 666 (Bandy Road); thence in a southerly direction until
Route 666 (Bandy Road) intersects Route 667; thence in a southeasterly
direction with Secondary Route 667 approximately 4,400 feet to the end
of the present State Maintenance; thence leaving State Route 667 in a
direction S. 450 W. approximately 200 feet to a hollow; thence up the
hollow in a southeasterly direction with the low point of the hollow as
it meanders until it intersects the Franklin County line at the crest of
the Blue Ridge Mountains; thence with the Roanoke-Franklin County line
in a southwesterly to northwesterly direction as it meanders along the
crest of the Blue Ridge Mountains to State Secondary Route 613; thence
northerly along State Secondary Route 613 until it intersects the Blue
Ridge Parkway; thence in a south easterly and northeasterly direction
with the Blue Ridge Parkway until it intersects Primary Highway 220;
I
-~,
I
Ii
I
II
~
6-22--82
538
.
thence northerly with Primary Highway 220 to the place of BEGINNING.
Cave Spring Magisterial District
Voting Place - Clearbrook Fire Station
I
(k)
HUNTING HILLS PRECINCT
BEGINNING at a point where U.S. Route 419 (Avenham Avenue) intersects
the corporate line of the City of Roanoke; thence in a southeasterly
direction with the corporate line of the City of Roanoke and partially
with Route 220 to a point where the said Route 220 intersects the Blue
Ridge Parkway; thence with the Blue Ridge Parkway in a southwesterly and
then northwesterly direction to its intersection with Route 613; thence
in a northerly direction with State Secondary Route 613 to Secondary
Route 904 at Starkey; thence in an easterly and northerly direction with
State Secondary Route 904 to its intersection with State Primary Route
419; thence in a northeasterly direction with State Primary Route 419
(Avenham Avenue Extension) to the place of BEGINNING.
Cave Spring Magisterial District
Voting Place - Old Pinkard Court School
Roanoke County, Virginia, as a result of the herein above set out,
precincts established or re-established as Glenvar Precinct and Peters
Creek Precinct; to-wit:
BRUSHY MOUNTAIN PRECINCT
4. That all and singular of the remaining precincts hereto for
established in Roanoke County and the voting place for each, all of
which is more particularly described on a certain map a copy of which is
I
on file in the office of the Registrar of Roanoke County, shall be and
remain duly established precincts and voting places in Roanoke County.
5. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and
after its passage.
On motion of Supervisor May W. Johnson and adopted by the following
roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Burton, Myers, Minter, Johnson and Park
NAYS:
None
,...
539
6-22-82
IN RE:
PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO THE LEASE AND SALE OF CERTAIN SUPRLUS
REAL ESTATE OWNED BY ROANOKE COUNTY
County Real Estate Assessor Andrew E. Clingenpeel advised the
County owns 17 parcels considered surplus. He recommended an update of
I
appraisals be done prior to their being offered for sale. He also suggested
the small lots be offered first to the adjacent property owners. Chairman
Park asked John R. Hubbard, Director of Utility Administration and EngineeriI ,
if all of the well lots to be disposed of are unnecessary; Mr. Hubbard
replied that they were. Chairman Park then asked County Administrator
Donald R. Flanders if he felt any of the land the County owns could be used
for the site of a new dog pound; he then asked the County Assessor why the
site of the former County landfill at Dixie Caverns is being retained.
Supervisor Myers then moved that staff be directed to proceed to bring in
a plan of action for disposal of the surplus real estate. His motion was
adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Burton, Myers, Minter, Johnson, and Park
NAYS:
None
I
Supervisor Johnson moved for adoption of the following, prepared
resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 3162 CONCURRING IN THE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
AND TRANSPORTATION'S REQUEST TO DELAY THE BID DATE UPON A
CERTAIN SECONDARY HIGlmAY PROJECT UPON CERTAIN TERMS AND
CONDITIONS.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain request of the Virginia Department of Highways
and Transportation to delay the bid date from June, 1982, to February,
1983, relating to that certain secondary highway project known as Route
676, Project 0676-080-163, M50l, B640, be, and it hereby is concurred in
I
by the Board; and
2. That that certain section of Route 676 described as follows:
Being a section of Route 676 one tenth of a mile long beginning 2.15
miles west of Route 220 and ending one mile north of Route 615, shall be
closed to public travel during the period of construction of Project
0767-080-163, M50l, B640; and
I,
~Ii
~
6-22-82
540
I
3. That the Board's concurrence in the request of the State
Department of Highways and Transportation is granted on the express
condition that the project hereinabove mentioned shall maintain its
priority status in the Six Year Plan and that funds budgeted for said
project shall not be otherwise utilized; and
4. That an attested copy of this resolution be forthwith forwarded
to the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Supervisors Burton, Myers, Minter, Johnson and Park
None
I
On motion by Supervisor Johnson, adopted by a unanimous voice
vote, a copy of a letter from VVKR Incorporated transmitting a copy of the
recently performed geotechnical exploration report for the new County
Courthouse was received and filed (original letter and the report will
be on file in the County Administrator's office).
On motion by Supervisor Myers, adopted by a unanimous voice vote,
the Supervisors voted to approve the application of the Roanoke County
Fire Training Committee for a raffle permit and to waive the $25 filing fee.
IN RE:
REPORT OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
I
County Administrator Donald R. Flanders presented a report on
the 911 telephone system, prepared by Thomas C. Fuqua and Michael F.
Kavanaugh, and briefly outlined its content. Mr. Flanders advised the
Supervisors that the meeting schedule for June 28, 1982, to discuss
possible legislation with other concerned counties had been canceled and
would be re-set later this year.
Mr. Flanders updated the Supervisors on the progress being
made at the future Roanoke County Adflinistrative Center.
He then reminded the Supervisors of the neighborhood meeting
to be held next Tuesday (June 29) at the Hollins Branch library; this is
~
r
541
-i
6-22-82
.
the se.cond of the five magisterial district meetings which the Supervisors
" .
have requested be held this year. Mr. Flanders also outlined the methods
being used to promote and publicize this meeting.
The County Administrator then briefly reported on the Westward
I
Lake dam project.
He also mentioned he had been called by Glen S. Tittermary, Senior
Legislative Analyst with the State's Joint Legislative Audit and Review
Commission, for assistance in setting up a meeting regarding construction
funds under the secondary highway system.
Deviating from the order of the prepared agenda, Mr. Flanders
presented a resolution providing for two new positions in the County's
classified service. Supervisor Minter moved for adoption of the prepared
resolution:
RESOLUTION 3163 ESTABLISHING TWO (2) NEW POSITIONS
IN THE CLASSIFIED SERVICE OF ROANOKE COUNTY AND PROVIDING
FOR GRADES AND PAY RATES AND RANGES FOR SUCH POSITIONS.
I
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County as
follows:
1. That, from and after July 1, 1982, there be; and hereby is,
established as positions in the Classified Service of the County the
psoition of Assistant Director of Finance and the position of Personnel
Officer; and
2. That, the position of Assistant Director of Finance herein
established shall be placed in the classified pay plan in the following
grade and pay range; to-wit,
GRADE
RANGE
40
21,564
22,584
23,664
24,816
26,040
27,312
I
:
;
!
3.
That, the position of Personnel Officer herein established,
shall be placed in the classified pay plan in the following grade and
1\
I
pay range; to-wit,
GRADE
RANGE
36
17,820
18,696
19,596
20,532
21,565
22,584
~
6-22-82
54 2
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Burton, Myers, Minter, Johnson, and Park
NAYS:
None
I
The County Administrator then distributed to the Supervisors
a report on the Fifth Planning District Commission.
At the request of Chairman Park, Parks and Recreation Director
C. Darrell Shell presented a report on his Department's use of the
facilities at the Bonsack Ruritan Club (report is on file in County
Administrator's office).
Director of Data Processing Harry A. Franks was present to
discuss acquisition of Rapid/3000 programming. Chairman Park said he
preferred to wait for a complete report after this has been discussed
I
with the School Board..
IN RE:
REPORT OF COUNTY ATTORNEY
At this point in the meeting, the County Attorney was answering
a phone call from the County Planning Commission, also meeting this date.
IN RE:
REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
John M. Chambliss, Jr. had nothing to bring before the Board.
IN RE:
REPORT OF BID COMMITTEE
Purchasing Supervisor E. D. Fitzgerald read aloud the Bid
I
Committee's report on purchase of a cathodic protection system in the
Algoma water storage tank. Supervisor Johnson moved adoption of the
RESOLUTION NO. 3164 ACCEPTING A BID MADE TO THE COUNTY OF
ROANOKE TO FURNISH AND INSTALL A CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM IN
THE ALGOMA WATER TANK AT PENN FOREST.
I
I
I
I
,
I
!
,
+--
I
I
I
I
following, prepared resolution:
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
~
~
6-22-82
543
Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain bid of Harco Corporation in the amount of
$3,900.00 to furnish and install a Cathodic Protection System in the
Algoma Water Tank at Penn Forest, being the lowest and best bid received
by the County, upon all and singular the terms and conditions of the
I
invitation to bid, the specifications of the County of Roanoke, the
bidder's proposal, and the provisions of this resolution, be, and same
hereby is APPROVED; and
2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed
to enter into a contract upon a form approved by the County Attorney
I~
with Harco Corporation for this purchase; and
3. That all other bids for this purchase are hereby rejected and
I'
the County Clerk is directed to so notify such bidders and express the
Ii
County's appreciation for the submission of their bids.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Burton, Myers, Minter, Johnson, and Park
I,
I
NAYS:
None
I
IN RE:
REPORTS OF PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Director of Parks and Recreation, C. Darrell Shell was present
and reviewed the content of his report on Community Education. Supervisor
Myers moved that the Supervisors deny permission to apply to the State
, Department of Education for funds. Supervisor Johnson, as a substitute
motion, moved for adoption of the prepared resolution, with the understandiu
that there is no commitment of funds for next year.
RESOLUTION NO. 3165 AUTHORIZING ROANOKE COUNTY TO FILE A
CERTAIN GRANT APPLICATION SEEKING FUNDING OF COllliUNITY EDUCATION
DEMONSTRATION PROJECT FROM TIlE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
1. That a certain grant application on behalf of Roanoke County
I
Virginia, as follows:
seeking a grant of $17,344.00 for a certain education demonstration
project at the Penn Forest Elementary School in connection with the
County Department of Parks and Recreation programs to the Virginia
Department of Education be, and such grant application hereby is approved
---
~
"
6.-22-82
544.
.
and authorized to be submitted; and
2. That such application shall be executed on behalf of Roanoke
County by the County Administrator upon form approved by the County
I
Attorney and shall contain among other provisions that the 50% share of
such grant to be provided by Roanoke County shall be provided through an
in-kind contribution; and
3. That an attested copy of this resolution shall be forwarded
along with said grant application to the Virginia Department of Educa-
tion.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Burton, Minter, Johnson and Park
NAYS:
Supervisor Myers
Gary A. Huff, Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation presented
I
the report on the donation from the Vinton Junior Women's Club and
introduced Ms. Andy Kesler, a member of the Club. Mrs. Kesler outlined
the source of the funds donated, which was a cookbook put together and
sold by Club members. Supervisor Johnson moved acceptance of the gift
and Supervisor Myers moved adoption of the following prepared resolution:
Resolution Number 3166
On motion made by Supervisor Robert E. Myers, the General
Appropriation Resolution of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 22, 1982,
be, and is the same hereby amended as follows to become effective June 22,
1982:
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NUMBER
I
Class:
Fund:
Dept:
Object:
Expenditures
General
Parks & Recreation
Recreation Equipment
Supplies
&
03-6-07100-54120
$ 735
Class:
Fund:
Source:
Revenues
General
Contributions
and Recreation
- Parks
03-5-16130-00000
735
Adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Burton, Myers, Minter, Johnson and Park
-
NAYS:
None
~
,...
545 t
6-22-82
IN RE:
REPORTS OF UTILITY ENGINEERING AND ADMINISTRATION
John R. Hubbard, Director of Utility Engineering and Administratior
outlined the report on the Meadowlark Road relief sewer project and explainec
why the bid was being awarded to other than the low bidder. Supervisor
Johnson moved adoption of the following prepared resolution:
I
RESOLUTION NO. 3167 ACCEPTING A CERTAIN BID MADE TO THE
COUNTY OF ROANOKE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE MEADOWLARK ROAD
RELIEF SEUER PROJECT, 8l-5-S.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain bid of J. P. Turner & Brothers, Inc. in the
amount of $36,902.00 for construction of the ~feadowlark Road Relief
Sewer Project, 8l-5-S, being the lowest and best bid received by the
County, upon all and singular the terms and conditions of the invitation
to bid, the specifications of the County of Roanoke the bidder's proposal
and the provisions of this resolution, be, and the same hereby is APPROVED;
and
2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed
I
to enter into a contract upon a form approved by the County Attorney
i
! with J. P. Turner & Brothers, Inc. for this construction; and
3. That all other bids for this work are hereby rejected and the
County Clerk is directed to notify such bidders and express the County's
appreciation for the submission of their bids.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Burton, Myers, Minter, Johnson and Park
NAYS:
None
At this point in the meeting, the County Attorney returned to the
He replied he had nothing to discuss until the Supervisors commenced
I
meeting room and was asked if he had any business to bring before the Board.
consideration of the resolution relating to the School Board Selection
!
,
Commission later in the meeting.
IN RE:
REPORTS FROM SCHOOL BOARD
!
:
Superintendent of Schools Bayes E. Wilson reviewed the School
~L
..,
6-22-82
546
Board's requested authorization to submit to the State Literary Fund
applications for loans totaling $3,966,000. He also explained the
procedure of applying for and spending the money if the loan is received.
I
Supervisor Myers asked if the projects listed in the School Board's report
would be the only things the money could be spent for, and Mr. Wilson
said yes. Supervisor Myers then asked if the listed projects are the most
important or vital that Mr. Wilson foresaw, and Mr. Wilson said yes.
Supervisor Burton then moved adoption of the following, prepared resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 3168 APPROVING THE SUBMISSION OF CERTAIN
APPLICATIONS TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FOR LITERARY FUND
LOANS IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $3,966,000.00 AS HEREIN SET
FORTH.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Literary Fund Loans' applications submitted by the
Roanoke County School System for certain funds which are available in
I
the maximum amount of $2,000,000.00 per project with a five-year expenditure
period at a three percent interest rate, be, and the same hereby are
APPROVED as follows:
Construction of Vinton Junior H~gh School
$2,000,000.00
Mount Pleasant School: 4 classrooms, bathrooms,
library, storage
250,000.00
Back Creek School: 3 kindergarten classrooms, bathrooms 225,000.00
Mason's Cove School: cafeteria 136,000.00
Cave Spring Elementary School: 4 kindergarten classrooms,
bathrooms 200,000.00
Green Valley School: library expansion
100,000.00
William Byrd High School: 4 classrooms
150,000.00
Various schools: alter lighting system
420,000.00
I
alter ceilings
485,000.00
$3,966,000.00
TOTAL
2. That the Roanoke County School Board be, and it hereby is
authorized to execute the necessary documents on behalf of the Roanoke
County School Board for this loan application.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Burton, Myers, Minter, Johnson and Park
1:-
NAYS:
None
I
II .....
r
547 I
6-22-82
Superintendent Wilson also presented the report requesting
transfer of certain funds within the School Board's 1981-82 operating
budget and explained the necessity for the transfers. Supervisor Johnson
f
moved for adoption of, the following prepared resolution:
Resolution Number 3169
.1
On motion made by Supervisor May W. Johnson, the General
Appropriation Resolution of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 23, 1981
be, and is the same hereby amended as follows to become effective June 22,
1982:
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NUMBER
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
Class:
Fund:
Dept:
Expenditures
School
Instruction
Sununer School
Adult Education
Operations
l7-6-l7B10-00000
l7-6-l7HOO-00000
17-6-17100-00000
l7-6-l7F10-00000
$(50,000)
(15,700)
(20,000)
85,700
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I'
Adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Burton, Myers, Minter, Johnson, and Park
1
NAYS:
None
i
IN RE:
REPORT OF COUNTY GRANTS COMMITTEE
Mr. John R. Hubbard was spokesman for the Grants Conunittee and
I presented their report on the Virginia Conununity Development Block Grant
Program, which report listed four top-priority projects in order of
importance. Chairman Park suggested that a solid waste disposal facility
should be the top priority instead of last; Supervisor Burton concurred.
County Engineer Gene Robertson, a member of the Regional Solid Waste
Management Board, said he had received an opinion from the landfill Board's
attorney, Edward A. Natt, which said the bailer can be bought without the
.
or another. When asked if this was correct, County Attorney James E.
1
County participation and that the County would have to pay for it one way
Buchholtz replied he had not seen Mr. Natt's opinion and requested a copy
of the letter and agreement. In reply to Mr. Park's conunents about the
order of priorities, John Hubbard said our priorities were set according I
to how the source of funds would look at priorities. Supervisor Johnson
___ asked that the water supply facility be moved up and that industrial site
development be moved down.
--,
6-22-62
54~
IN RE:
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
Director of Finance John M. Chambliss, Jr., spoke briefly,
outlining the provisions of the resolution adopting the County budget
I
for fiscal year 1982-83 and mentioned changes made from last year's budget.
Supervisor Burton moved for adoption of the following, prepared resolution:
Resolution Number 3170
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke,
Virginia, that the following appropriations are hereby made from the
respective funds for the period ending June 30, 1983, for the functions
and purposes indicated:
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NUMBER
I
Class: Expenditures
Fund: General Operating
Dept: Board of Supervisors 03-6-01101 $ 52,922
County Administrator 03-6-01201 95,999
Personnel 03-6-01203 45,816
County Attorney 03-6-01204 66,990
Commissioner of the Revenue 03-6-01209 226,184
County Assessor 03-6-01210 244,575
County Treasurer 03-6-01213 261,043
Central Accounting 03-6-01215 278,470
Purchasing 03-6-01222 62,244
Elections 03-6-01300 81,788
Circuit Court 03-6-02101 64,400
General District Court 03-6-02102 14,100
Magistrates 03-6-02103 600
J&D Relations District Court 03-6-02105 5,600
Clerk of Circuit Court 03-6-02106 258,976
Commonwealth's Attorney 03-6-02201 188,948
Probation 03-6-03303 21,300
Policing & Investigating 03-6-03102 1,996,152
Highway Safety Commission 03-6-03103 700
Communications 03-6-03104 247,391
Youth & Family Services 03-6-03105 223,168
Fire Department 03-6-03201 638,162
Rescue Squad 03-6-03203 107,400
Emergency Services 03-6-03204 17,476
Confinement &Care of Priosners03-6-03301 1,311,103
Animal Control 03-6-03501 94,848
Garage 03-6-01221 98,852
Inspections 03-6-03400 147,972
Street Lighting 03-6-04104 77 , 400
Refuse Disposal 03-6-04200 50,100
County Engineer 03-6-04301 141,681
Buildings and Grounds 03-6-04302 805,772
Public Health 03-6-05101 258,000
Welfare Administration 03-6-05301 1,335,600
Public Assistance 03-6-05302 786,100
Institutional Care 03-6-05304 39,200
Parks and Recreation 03-6-07100 653,502
Library 03-6-07300 704,355
Planning & Zoning 03-6-08100 74,145
Planning Commission 03-6-08101 11,200
Extension & Continuing
Education 03-6-08300 65,734
1-
I
~
r-
-----
549 . 6-22-32
INCREASE
DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER (DECREASE)
~
Dept:
Employee Benefits 03-6-09102 $ 260,000
Insurance 03-6-09103 134,300
Contributions to Service
Organizations 03-6-09104 95,700 I
Miscellaneous Operations 03-6-09105 285,400
Debt Service 03-6-09304 1,910,100
Transfer to Air Pollution
Control 03-6-09311 25,061
Transfer to Capital Projects 03-6-09316 340,270
Transfer to Schools 03-6-09317 19,352,304
Transfer to Internal Services 03-6-09370 219,609
Unappropriated Balance 03-6-99999 758,170
, Fund: Air Pollution Control Fund 74,441
Revenue Sharing Fund 718,400
Internal Services Fund:
Dept: Data Processing 252,212
Radio Maintenance 137,694
Fund: Capital Improvements Fund 2,292,074
Sewer Bond Fund 3,050,000
I Water Bond Fund 220,000
, Utility Fund:
I Dept: Utility Billing 89,422
Refuse Disposal 1,187,768
Utility Engineering 268,357
~ Utility Maintenance and Operations 2,939,862
! Utility Non-Departmental:
Refuse 112,232
Water 1,329,664 I
Sewer 861,033
Fund: School Operating Fund:
Dept: Administration 515,940
Instruction 28,444,000
I Attendance & Health 520,293
Transportation 2,131,163
I Operation and Maintenance 5,577,943
Fixed Charges 7,8Lf9,750
Summer School 175,778
Adult Education 104,296
Debt Service 1,923,125
Fund: Cafeteria Fund 2,655,500
Federal Programs Fund 779,460 I
School Textbook Fund 370,196
School Bond Construction Fund 4,629,000
Total Expenditures $104,446,485
Class: Revenues
Fund: General Operating Fund $ 35,236,882
Air Pollution Control Fund 74,441
Revenue Sharing Fund 718,400
Internal Services Fund 389,906
Capiital Improvements Fund 2,292,074 I
Sewer Bond Fund 3,050,000
Water Bond Fund 220,000
Utility Fund 6,788,338
School Operating Fund 47,242,288
Cafeteria Fund 2,655,500
Federal Programs Fund 779,460
School Textbook Fund 370,196
School Bond Construction Fund Lf, 629,000
i
Total Revenues $104,446,485
i
J
!
I I
I
I
~I
. .
6-22-82
550
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Burton, Myers, Minter, Johnson and Park
NAYS:
None
I
Mr. Chambliss advised the Supervisors that because of last-
minute changes made during the budget review session which began at
3:10 p.m. today, the resolution approving the County employees' pay scale
for the 1982-83 fiscal year was not ready for consideration. Because
the pay scale must be set before June 30, it was suggested that this matter
be continued to the Supervisors meeting to be held at the Hollins branch
library on June 29th.
County Attorney James E. Buchholtz explained the desirability
of adopting the proposed resolution relating to the School Board
Selection Commission. He advised that because of legislation recently
I
enacted by the General Assembly, unless the Supervisors request otherwise,
only three persons will be appointed to this Commission. Supervisor Minter
moved for adoption of the following, prepared resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 3171 REQUESTING THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ROANOKE
COUNTY TO ESTABLISH A SCHOOL BOARD SELECTION COMMISSION
CONSISTING OF A MEMBER FROM EACH OF THE FIVE MAGISTERIAL
DISTRICTS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That pursuant to Section 22.1-35 of the Code of Virginia of
1950, as amended, the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, is
hereby requested to appoint a School Board Selection Commission consisting
of a member from each of the five magisterial districts of Roanoke
County; and
I
2. That the herein embodied request of the Board of Supervisors
shall be the continuing position of the Board until such time as amended
by official action of the Board; and
3. That an attested copy of this resolution be forthwith transmitted
to the Circuit Court of Roanoke County.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Burton, Myers, Minter, Johnson and Park
1-
NAYS:
None
~
~
551
6-22-82
Chairman Park read aloud the resolution of congratulation to the
4-H Club members, and Supervisor Minter moved for adoption of the following,
prepared resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 3172 CONGRATULATING 4-H CLUB MEMBERS,
ROBERT HARRIS AND MARY KATHERINE HARRIS FOR THE CHAMPION
STEERS THEY RAISED AND EXHIBITED AT ThE 1982 ROANOKE AREA
JUNIOR LIVESTOCK SHOW.
I
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That congratulations be extended to Roanoke County 4-H member,
Robert Harris, for raising and exhibiting the Grand Champion Steer at
the 1982 Roanoke Area Junior Livestock Show and to his sister, Mary
Katherine Harris, for raising and exhibiting the Reserve Champion
Steer; and
2. That the Roanoke County 4-H prograrn be acknowledged for providing
training and leadership opportunities for growth and development of
Roanoke County youth as exhibited by Robert and Mary Harris.
/s/ Edward C. Park, Jr., Chairman
I
/s/ Athena E. Burton, Vice Chairman
/s/ May W. Johnson
I
/s/ Robert E. Myers
/s/ Gary J. Minter
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Burton, Myers, Minter, Johnson and Park
NAYS:
None
Supervisor Myers moved for adoption of the following, prepared
resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 3173 RECOGNIZING THE CLEAN VALLEY COMMITTEE,
INC., AND AUTHORIZING SAME TO APPLY FOR ANTI-LITTER PROGRAM
GRANTS FOR ROANOKE COUNTY
I
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, that said Board:
1. Hereby endorses and supports an anti-litter program for the
Roanoke Valley; and
2. Hereby expresses the intent to combine with the City of Roanoke,
----
I
I
I
"
(j
!
1
i
i
I
I
,
j
!
i
I
I
i
I
,
l
I
I
I ,
I
i
,
I
I
I
I
.
I
!
I
I
j
I
I
I
!
!
!
i
I
"
6-22-82
455 2 ~
I
Town of Vinton, and City of Salem in a mutually agreed upon and Cooperative
program, contingent on approval of the Application by the Department of
Conservation and Economic Development, Division of Litter Control, and
contingent on receipt of funds; and
3. Hereby authorizes Clean Valley Committee, Inc., to plan and
budget for a cooperative anti-litter program, which shall represent said
Program for all localities named in this resolution; and
4. Further authorizes Clean Valley Committee, Inc. to apply on
behalf of Roanoke County for a grant, and to be responsible for the
administration, implementation, and completion of the Program; and
5. Further accepts responsibility jointly with the Clean Valley
Committee, Inc., and the City of Roanoke, Town of Vinton, and City of
Salem for all phases of the program; and
6. Further accepts liability for its pro rata share of any funds
not properly used or accounted for pursuant to the Regulations and the
Application; and
7. That said funds, when received, will be transferred immediately
to Clean Valley Committee, Inc. All funds will be used in the Cooperative
Program to which we give our endorsement and support; and
8. Further provide that the financial records of the Clean Valley
Committee, Inc. shall be subject to inspection and review by the County
Finance Director and such data shall be presented to allow proper reporting
on a timely basis by the County; and
9. Hereby requests the Department of Conservation and Economic
Development, Division of Litter Control, to consider and approve the
Application and Program, said Program being in accord with Regulations
governing use and expenditure of said funds.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Burton, Myers, Minter, Johnson and Park
NAYS:
None
Supervisor Johnson moved for adoption of the following, prepared
resolution:
~
".
5"p t~ f;
6-22-82
._,
RESOLUTION NO. 3174 AUTHORIZING THE TREASURER OF ROANOKE
COUNTY TO ORDER CERTAIN DOG TAGS AS A CATALOG PURCHASE INSTEAD
OF A SPECIAL ORDER ITEM.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County~
1. That the Treasurer of Roanoke County having advised the Board
I
Virginia~ as follows:
of Supervisors that the necessary purchase of dog tags by his office can
be accomplished less expensively through a catalog purchase thereof
rather than as a special order item at less expense to the County~ and
the Board being cognizant of such does hereby authorize the Treasurer of
Roanoke County to purchase dog tags for Roanoke County as a catalog
purchase rather than as a special order item; and
2. The authority hereby granted to the Treasurer of Roanoke
County shall supersede the requirements of the County Code to the
contrary.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Burton~ Myers~ Minter~ Johnson and Park
I
I;
NAYS:
None
At this point in the meeting~ the County Attorney requested an
executive session to discuss personnel~ real estate~ and legal matters~
pursuant to Section 2.1-344(a) (l)~ (2)~ and (6) of the Code of Virginia.
IN RE:
APPOINTMEI\TTS
The Supervisors had before them a memorandum from the County
Administrator listing the names of persons recommended to serve on the
County Impoundment Safety Technical Advisory Committee. Supervisor Minter
I
moved that the five persons listed be appointed 1 year terms of office.
The motion was adopted by a unanimous voice vote.
Consideration of the following appointments was continued at
the Supervisors' request:
(1) Term of County Engineer R. E. Robertson on the Roanoke
Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board~ expires in
July~ 1982.
I
I
I
.~
6-22-82
554
(2) Term of Edwin N. LeGard, Jr. on the Air Pollution
Advisory and Appeals Board, expires in July, 1982
(3) Replacement for Mrs. Helen Rutrough on the All T' 1 i ution
Advisory and Appeals Board (she resigned in May, 1981)
Supervisor Myers moved that Ernest M. Proffit and Posey G. Oyler
be reappointed as alternate members of the Building Code Board of
Adjustments and Appeals. The motion was adopted by a unanimous voice
vote.
IN RE:
REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
Vice Chairman Burton commented she would like to see our
grounds maintenance upgraded; she was concerned about the appearance of
some of the County buildings.
Supervisor Myers reminded the Board that Chief Building Official
Robert A. Franklin, Sr. had been authorized to extend his vacation into
next year, and Mr. Myers directed that a letter be put in Mr. Franklin's
personnel file to this effect. The motion was adopted by a unanimous
voice vote. County Administrator Flanders asked that this privilege be
allowed for other department heads. Supervisor Myers moved approval of
this request and his motion was adopted by a unanimous voice vote.
Supervisor Minter mentioned a recent article in NACo's County
News about local government assisting in neighborhood disputes and another
article about food stamps, both of which he thought interesting and
worthwhile reading.
Supervisor Johnson suggested there was a need in the Zoning
Ordinance of Roanoke County for a separate zoning category or classification I
for townhouses as opposed to apartments. She directed that the County
Administrator look into this. Supervisor Minter suggested a zoning
classification to differentiate regular, sit-down restaurants from beer
joints and dance hall-type establishments.
i
~
i
!
I
~
r
I
6-22-82
555
Chairman Park directed the Director of Parks and Recreation and th
County Attorney to go over the letter from the Chief Building Inspector
which prohibited the use of the Bonsack Ruritan Club because of its
situation in a flood plain area. Mr. Park also asked for a legal opinion
on whether, if the Bonsack senior citizens didn't want their programs
moved from the Ruritan Club building to the Bonsack ~1ethodist Church directl
across the road, the County could finance the programs but have the
Ruritan Club administer them in the Club building.
County Commissioner of the Revenue R. Wayne Compton was present
at this meeting, and Chairman Park asked him to stay for the upcoming
executive session.
At 10:20 p.m. Supervisor Minter moved to go into executive session
to consider personnel, real estate, and legal matters, pursuant to Section
I
i
2.l-344(a) (1), (2), and (6) of the Code of Virginia. His motion was
adopted by a unanimous voice vote.
At 11:09 p.m. the Supervisors returned to open session on motion
by Supervisor Myers and a unanimous voice vote. Supervisor Myers then
moved that when this meeting is adjourned, it be adjourned to 7:00 p.m.
on Tuesday, June 29, 1982, at which time the County Board will consider
the following matters: Resolutions pertaining to persol}llel, pay scales,
\;'
budget, and solid waste; the appointment of members of committees,
cocrmissions, and board; discussion of methods of establishing a weekly
I
County Board meeting schedule; holding a public information meeting; and
an executive session to discuss personnel matters.
IN RE:
ADJOURNMENT
The Board adjourned at 11:12 p.m. by unanimous voice vote.
~
~ c::~
I
I
I
I
,I
I