6/8/1982 - Regular
ffit'-'
6-8-82
491.
Roanoke Counby Board of
Supervisors
Conference Room 2
Sheraton Airport
Roanoke, Virginia
June 8, 1982
County Board Chairman Park called to order the Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors, which convened pursuant to call at 11:45 a.m. in
Conference Room 2 at the Sheraton Airport in Roanoke on June 8, 1982.
\}~'tY
CO
OF
ROllliO
~~
EDWARD C. PARK. JR., CHAIRMAN
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
I
MAY W. J HNSON
CAVE SP G MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
ATHENA E. BURTON, VICE CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
GARY J INTER
HOLLINS GISTERlAL DISTRICT
DONALD R. FLANDERS
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
P. O. BOX 1079
SALEM, VIRGINIA 24153
ROBERT . MYERS
CAT,a,WB ,a,GISTERI"l DISTRICT
June 8, 1982
I
l
~
I
I
I
I
I
Mr. Donald R. Flanders. Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
430 East Clay Street
Salem, Virginia 24153
Dear Mr. Flanders:
Please call a special meeting of the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County for Tuesday. June 3, 1982, at
11:45 a.m. to be held at the Airport Sheraton for the purpose
of discussing with area legislators and the State Highway
Commissioner the allocation of secondary highway funds and
the use which may be made thereof within Roanoke County.
Very truly yours,
/) /)/
I. ,
/ C/ ~.~
Cha i rman .
of Sup0isors
,.--..,
y .I
/ ,
/ /?Yv'~or; (
\. -
E ward C. Park, Jr.,
Roanoke County Board
~ -~
Jo~ns911, Member
ke gounty Board of Supervisors
I
I
/
I
""'1'l'"
,
6-3-32
492
I
\J~1Y
CO
OF
RO)t/{O
1(~
EDWARD C P
VINTON MAGIS
MAY W. JOHNSON
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL OIST ICT
ATHENA E. 6 TON, VICE CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILL AGISTERIAL DISTRICT
GARY J. MINTER
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
DONALD R. F
COUNTY ADMIN
ROBERT E MYERS
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRIC
P. O. BOX 1079
SALEM, VIRGINIA 24153
June 8, 1982
W the undersigned, being all the members of the Board of Supervisors of
R noke County, Virginia, do hereby waive any defects in the notice of a
s ~cial meeting of said Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to be held
a the Airport-Sheraton, Roanoke, Virginia, on Tuesday, June 8, 1982, at
I
1 45 a.m. for the purpose of discussing with area legislators and State
H" hway Commissioner the allocation of Secondary Highway funds and the
u which may be made thereof within Roanoke County and any other matters
tl t may be agreed upon by the Supervisors.
Ia:. /
,/ / .../) .
. ). d/V'a{(' I ( tU~
lndward C. Park, Jr., Chairman //
/
'/ J/
,
.;;,~ ~ ;/) L
LrL (0 - ~
Athena E. Burton, Vice Chairman
May
y U~1-4_u-r'-/
ohnson.'
I
/1
t. i
. ,1 I" .
/., I"i,' ,;/ 'J't' '..
\ . , '.,
.l i.
J .'
/ / t)
/
j .....~
r"'
'.
Gary James Minter
/~~j
/' ,C --~~)
./ / vt--/ . ~~ .A.c4
rRobert E. My('rs' ,/
I
i
I
I
I
!
I
I
,I
II
'I
I-
I
~
6-8-82
49~
Members Present:
Chairman Edward C. Park, Jr., Vice Chairman Athena
E. Burton, Supervisors May ~J. Johnson, Gary J. Minter
and Robert E. Myers.
Members Absent:
None
I
Following lunch and discussion of goals of the meeting, the
Board met at 1:30 p.m. with State Senators Ray L. Garland and Dudley J.
Emick and Delegates C. Richard Cranwell, A. Victor Thomas, and Clifton A.
Woodrum, III to explain the problem of shortage of construction funds that
confronts Roanoke County under the present Secondary Highway allocation
formula.
An in-depth presentation of the problem was made to those in
attendance by John Peters of the County Engineering staff which was followed
by a len8hty interchange among legislators, County Board members, and staff
: as to methods available to correct the inequities of the present distribution
formula.
I
The report that Mr. Peters developed was then presented at 3:00
,
p.m. to Mr. Harold C. King, Commissioner of the Virginia Department of
, Highways and Transportation; Mr. T. George Vaughan, Jr., Highway Commission
Member from the Salem District; Mr. Fred C. Altizer, Jr., local Resident
., Engineer; Mr. M. E. Wood, Jr., Salem District Engineer; and Mr. Oscar K.
:
!
Mabry, Director of Planning for the State Highway Department.
Mr. King responded that the State Legislature has created a study
committee which is to report its findings to the Legislature during its
1983 session. He urged the County to provide information to the committee
, so that consideration can be given to the allocation formula in its report
to the Legislature.
Chairman Park expressed the sincere appreciation of the County
I
Board and citizens of Roanoke County to the legislators and to Mr. King,
Mr. Vaughan and staff for attending, participating, and assisting in
alerting the County as to potentials for correcting the funding problem.
----
~
.. ~ '
.,
6-8-82
494
The Board recessed at 3:50 p.m. to go to the Salem-Roanoke
County Civic Center to go into budget review session prior to the
regular meeting of the County Board. Chairman Park called the budget
I
review session to order at 4:20 p.m. with all members of the County Board
present.
The budget review session concluded at 6:00 p.m.
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Salem-Roanoke County Civic Center
Salem, Virginia
June 8, 1982
The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this
day in open session at the Salem-Roanoke County Civic Center in Salem,
Virginia, this being the second Tuesday and the first regular meeting of
the month of June, 1982.
I
Members Present:
Chairman Edward C. Park, Jr., Vice Chairman Athena E.
Burton, Supervisors May W. Johnson, Gary James Minter and Robert E. Myers.
Members Absent:
None
IN RE:
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Park called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
The Chairman then deviated from the order of the prepared agenda
by recognizing Sergeant Art LaPrade from the County Sheriff's Department
who attended the meeting for the purpose of getting the Board Chairman's
I
signature on four Highway Safety Grant Applications. Supervisor Johnson
moved adoption of the following prepared resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 3154 APPROVING THE SUBMISSION OF CERTAIN
GRANT APPLICATIONS BY THE ROANOKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
HEREINAFTER SET FORTH TO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SAFETY FOR HIG}n~AY SAFETY FUNDS AND AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN
TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY CONTRACTS FOR THESE GRANT APPLICATIONS.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
I
I-
I
Virginia, as follows:
~
,....-
6-8-82
495
1. That the grant applications submitted by the Roanoke County
Sheriff's Department to the Virginia Department of Transportation Safety
for highway safety funds for the following projects be, and the same are
hereby approved:
(a) Virginia Alcohol Safety Action Program (VASAP) Patrols - to
provide extra patrols during holiday periods to apprehend
persons driving under the influence.
I
(b) "Officer Bill" - to provide material for bicycle and pedestrian
safety programs in the schools.
(c) Selective Traffic Enforcement Officer
!
I
i
!
~.
!
I:
Ii
(d) Field Breath Testing Units for testing persons suspected of
driving under the influence.
2. That the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors be, and he is
hereby authorized to execute the necessary contracts for these grant
applications; and
3. That the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors be, and he is
hereby directed to mail attested copies of this resolution to the
Virginia Department of Transportation Safety.
Adopted on motion by Supervisors 11ay W. Johnson and the following
I
recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Myers, ~1inter, Johnson, Burton and Park.
NAYS:
None
IN RE:
EXECUTIVE SESSION
At approximately 6:03 p.m., SupervisoLs Johnson moved that the
Supervisors go into executive session, pursuant to Section 2.l-344(a)(1),(2)
J and (6) of the Code of Virginia to discuss personnel, real estate, and legal
matters. Her motion was adopted by a unanimous voice vote.
IN RE: RETURN TO REGULAR SESSION
At about 7:05, the Supervisors returned to the meeting room and,
I
on motion by Supervisor ~1inter, voted unanimously to return to open session.
Chairman Park advised those present that the meeting had been called to
order at 6:00 p.m. and that the Supervisors had been in executive session
,
since that time.
-
~
~
6-8-82
496
IN RE:
INVOCATION/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Reverend T. D. Toler, Jr. offered the invocation; the pledge
of allegiance to the flag was then recited in unison by all present.
I
IN RE:
ITEMS SUBMITTED FOR INFORMATION
Supervisor Johnson moved that the April Departmental Activities
Reports, a letter from the Children's Hospital in Richmond, a letter from
Virginia Western Community College, a letter of resignation from W. L.
Whitwell, a report on the County employees' health plan, and the summary
of appropriations through May 25, 1982, be received and filed. Her motion
was adopted by a unanimous voice vote.
IN RE:
PUBLIC HEARING
I
APPLICATION OF JESSE AND ELIZABETH FISHER FOR A *
SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO PARK A MOBILE HOME ON A *
4-ACRE TRACT ON THE EAST SIDE OF STATE ROUTE *
649, ABOUT 800 FEET FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH * APPROVED
ROUTE 639 IN CATAWBA DISTRICT(CONTlNUED FROM *
MAY 11 BOARD MEETING) *
Mr. and Mrs. Fisher were present for this hearing. Mr. John K. Muncy
present in opposition. At the public hearing held May 11, 1982, on this
application, Supervisors Myers asked that it be continued to this meeting
to give him the opportunity of viewing the site. He apologized to the
petitioners and Mr. Muncy for not doing so. Supervisors Myers then asked
Mr. Fisher if he had changed his mind about the proposed location of the
mobile home. Mr. Fisher replied he would set it in the middle of the tract,
which would be about 200 feet from his property line. Supervisor Myers
said if the trailer was going to be 200 feet from all property lines, he
would moved that a permit be granted for a two-year period. Mr. Fisher said
the mobile home would be only about 100 feet from the Wayne Radford property.
I
Mr. Radford was present and said his land adjoined the Fishers'. Mr. Fisher
then advised those present that h~s land is 579 feet wide and 375 feet deep;
he will set the mobile home in the middle of the tract. Supervisor
Johnson asked if the mobile home is new; Mr. Fisher replied that it is a
1964 model. Supervisor Johnson then asked if the mobile home was agreeable
to those present. Mr. Muncy said he had no objection to the mobile home if
it is to be set between the house and the railroad tracks.
I
I~
~
6-8-02
497
I
Supervisor Myers's motion was adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Burton, and Park.
NAYS:
None
IN RE:
APPLICATION OF MOUNTAINEER INVESTMENT COMPANY
A PERMIT FOR A FIREWORKS DISPLAY PROPOSED FOR
SATURDAY, JULY 3, 1982, BETllliEN 3:30 p.m. AND
10:00 p.m. AT OAK GROVE SHOPPING CENTER
FOR * I
* I
i~ APPROVED
)~
AND
APPLICATION OF HILLS DEPARTMENT STORE FOR A *
PERMIT FOR A FIREWORKS DISPLAY PROPOSED FOR *
SATURDAY, JULY 3, !(l~'").; ON THE PARKING LOT OF THE oJ~
CAVE SPRING CORNERS SHOPPING CENTER ON BRAMBLE TON * APPROVED
~E~E *
No spokesman for either applicant was present. County Administrato
Donald R. Flanders asked County Fire Inspector Alton G. Miller to discuss the
two applications. Mr. Miller advised the fire department is not totally
opposed to either application, but they are concerned about the possibility
of fires caused by fallout from the fireworks and about the traffic problems
generated by those attending the displays. The Supervisors had before them
I
a memorandum from County Sheriff O. S. Foster recommending that at least 8
off-duty officers be required at the Hills display and that at least 4 off-
duty officers be required at Oak Grove Plaza as a condition of the permits
being issued. lIe advised that unless the off-duty officers were required,
all the on-duty officers would be called away from their normal work to
direct traffic at these two shopping centers. Supervisor Johnson mentioned
that last year, Hills' application for a fireworks permit was denied
because of traffic tieups in previous years. Supervisor Burton was of the
opinion that in any type of public gathering, whether at an area civic
center, sports stadium, etc, traffic flow was a problem and that it would
be a shame not to celebrate the Fourth of July with fireworks solely
because of traffic. Chairman Park asked County Attorney James E. Buchholtz
about the County's liability. Mr. Buchholtz replied there would be no
I
County liability if the necessary safety precautions were taken. Neither
applicant is bonded, but the County Fire Marshall is to meet with each of
them about this before July 3. Supervisor Johnson then asked Mr. Miller
i
I, if he felt comfortable about the issuance of these permits; he said yes.
I,
The County Administrator ~eminded those present that the Oak Grove Plaza
~
~
6-8-32
498
is just across Route 419 from the City of Roanoke and recommended that
the City be advised of the County's action in issuing a fireworks permit
to the Mountaineer Investment Company so they would be prepared for
I
traffic flow problems. Supervisor Burton moved that both fireworks permits
be granted for July 3, 1982, with the stipulations set forth by they fire
department and Sheriff's department and that the applicants be properly
bonded. Her motion was adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Supervisors Minter, Johnson, Burton, Park and
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Supervisor Robert E. Myers
IN RE: LETTER FROM SIDNEY V. CROSSWHITE ABOUT WESTWARD LAKE DAM
Mr. Crosswhite was present and made a brief statement to the
effect that he felt the dangerous aspect of the Westward Lake dam situation
had been blown out of proportion by the news media and that not all
residents of the area believe the dam is dangerous. He further stated
I
that he and other residents feel it would be advantageous to the County if
they accepted ownership of the site. Supervisor Johnson moved that Mr.
Crosswhite's letter be received and filed; her motion was adopted by a
unanimous voice vote.
IN RE:
PROPOSED RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE CLEAN VALLEY *
COMMITTEE AS RECIPIENT OF VIRGINIA DIVISION OF
LITTER CONTROL FUNDS
CONTINUED TO
* JUNE 22, 1982
*
The County Administrator advisP0 that in discussions with the County
Attorney it was felt that some research should be done before adopting the
draft resolution that accompanied the Clean Valley Committee's request.
Supervisor Johnson asked the County Attorney about his reservations. He
replied that this draft resolution is not the same as those adopted in
I
years past and imposes upon the County certain requirements that the County
has no information on and over which it has no control. Supervisor Myers
moved to delay consideration of this resolution until June 22, 1982.
IN RE:
RECO~1ENDATION FROM VVKR, INCORPORATED THAT A FIRE ALARM SYSTEM
BE INSTALLED IN THE NEW ROANOKE COUNTY COURTHOUSE
The Supervisors asked what the cost of such a fire alarm system would
be. The County Administrator advised there was no cost estimate, that the
~
r
6-3--82
499 ·
architects were merely seeking approval to add an alarm system into their
plans. Supervisor Johnson moved that VVKR, Incorporated be authorized to
, incorporate a fire alarm system into their plans for the new Roanoke County
Courthouse. Her motion was adopted by a unanimous voice vote.
I
IN RE:
COUNTY TREASURER'S LETTER CONCERNING MUNICIPAL INTEREST
County Treasurer Alfred C. Anderson was present and read his letter
aloud. Supervisor Johnson advised she had received similar information
from the Virginia Association of Counties and that the Association suggested
the County take the same action being recommended by Mr. Anderson. Superviso
Johnson then moved for adoption of the following prepared resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 3155 MEMORIALIZING THE CONGRESS OF THE
UNITED STATES TO DEFEAT THE PROPOSED TAX CODE AMENDMENTS
RELATING TO REMOVAL OF THE TAX EXEMPT STATUS OF STATE AND
LOCAL OBLIGATIONS.
I,
WHEREAS, the Treasury Department of the United States Government has
proposed revisions to the minimum tax law that would require banks to add
back as a tax preference item for purposes of calculating the minimum tax
deductions taken for interest payments on debt to buy or carry tax exempt
I
Ii
i securities; and
I
WHEREAS, such a requirement would reduce substantially bank demand for
state and local obligations; and
WHEREAS, banks are currently the largest institutional holders of
state and local obligations and a reduction in their demand for municipal
I securities would have a severe negative impact on the municipal market.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Board opposes the Administration's proposal to include debt
interest deductions as a tax preference item in the calculation of banks'
minimum tax liability; and
2. That an attested copy of this resolution be forthwith forwarded
I
"
to the Virginia delegations to the United States Congress, to-wit:
I'
Honorable Harry F. Byrd, Jr. and Honorable John W. Warner, Senators and
Honorable M. Caldwell Butler, Honorable Paul S. Trible, Jr., Honorable
G. H. \\1hitehurst, Honorable Thomas J. Bliley, Jr., Honorable Robert \\1.
Daniel, Jr., Honorable H. C. Daniel, lionorable J. Kenneth Robinson,
-.,
6-8-82
500
Honorable Stanford E. Parrish, Honorable William C. Wampler, and Honorable
Frank R. Wolf, U.S. Representatives.
Adopted on motion by Supervisor May W. Johnson and the following roll
I
call vote:
AYES: Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Burton, and Park.
NAYS:
None
IN RE:
COUNTY TREASURER'S REQUEST - SIZE OF DOG TAGS
Mr. Anderson told the Supervisors he had been advised by County
Buyer Rebecca W. Stallard, that because of the size of dog tag specified
in the Roanoke County Code, the County is paying a premium price for its
dog tags. He advised he has requested the County Attorney to prepare a
resolution authorizing a change in the size of dog tags; the County
Attorney advised he had done so and that the resolution would be on the June
22nd agenda for the Board's consideration.
I
IN RE:
REPORTS FROM COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
The County Administrator gave the Supervisors an oral report
in which he reminded them of the neighborhood meeting at 7:30 p.m. on
June 29 at the Hollins branch library and the meeting with the County
School Board at 4:30 p.m. on June 10 at the school administration building,
at which meeting the two bodies would go into executive session to discuss
real estate matters.
He told the Supervisors that three of the resolutions listed on
this agenda for consideration tonight and pertaining to adoption of the
1982-83 County budget are not complete and requested that they be deferred to
the June 22nd Board meeting.
I
As a result of a discussion before the Supervisors on May 11, a
meeting was recently held which included the County Administrator, Chief
Animal Control Officer Kenneth L. Hogan, the County Attorney, and Assistant
Commonwealth's Attorney "Skip" Burkhart. At that meeting, enforcement of
humane laws was discussed and it was agreed that Officer Hogan would conduct
a training program for his staff.
Mr. Flanders outlined the content of a letter from David Loeks
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
Il~
,....--
501
6-8-82
from V.P.I. regarding the close ties between VPI and the County in the
planning area.
He advised that Sheriff Foster had agreed to work with him and
the Youth and Family Services staff to move that bureau to Pinkard Court
I
school temporarily because some of the County School Board offices presently
in Andrew L-wis school must be moved out and will be re-located in the area
now housing Youth and Family Services.
He also said General Registrar Elizabeth Leah had had a problem
finding a voting place in the Clearbrook area and suggested using the
Pinkard Court school for that purpose.
Mr. Flanders told the Supervisors he had instituted a staff study
of the County phone system. He also said he would be attending a meeting
with Captain Michael F. Kavanaugh of the County Sheriff's Department
regarding the 911 phone system in Bedford and whether such a program
might be installed in Roanoke County.
He mentioned the meeting on economic development held last
Thursday in Staunton which he attended along with Supervisor May Johnson and
I
Arnold Covey from the County Planner's office. It was felt to have been very
I
worthwhile.
(
Mrs. Johnson mentioned a meeting the Supervisors have at 3:00 p.m.
;
I:
on June 17 and asked if there would be a conflict with a meeting that same
day of the Youth and Family Services Advisory Council. Mr. Flanders
advised that the Council meeting was in the evening and that a conflict
was unlikely.
Chairman Park asked how the neighborhood meeting would be
i
advertised and Mr. Flanders outlined the various methods he had discussed
I:
in staff meeting Monday, June 7th.
I
IN RE:
REPORTS FROM COUNTY ATTORNEY
The County Attorney advised the Supervisors that his requested
I
executive session had been held earlier durins this session and that he
I
had nothing further to brine up.
""--
I:
~II
I
I
I
6-8-32
502
HI RE:
REPORTS ~ROM DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
Director of Finance Chambliss advised the Board he had nothing
to bring before the Supervisors at this meeting.
IN RE:
REPORTS FROM COUNTY ENGINEER
County Engineer R. E. Robertson read aloud his report on adding
Shawnee Drive (Fort Lewis Industrial Park) to the State secondary system.
Supervisor Myers moved adoption of the prepared resolution:
AT A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA,
HELD ON
June 8, 1982
Board 0 Supervisors
ORDER
VI
The Pu lie and the State Highway
Commi ion of Virginia
This matter came on this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application
for
hawnee Driv
to be
cepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways.
It appearing to the Board that drainage easements and II 5 0 '
right of way for said road
on
report
owner
retofore been de,:licated by virtue of a certain map known as Fori- T.Pw;!=; TnOll!=;t-ri ell
, which map was recorded in Plat Book 9
of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia,
us t 28 1981 , and that by reason of the recordation of said map no
rom a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right of way from the abutting property
is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right of way and right for drainage.
OW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that said road known as Shawnee Drive ,
~~ 460 to ~nn
o
ch is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this order, be. and the same is hereby established
lie road to become a part of the Sfate Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County.
n motion by Supervisor Robert E. Myers and
dopted by the following recorded vote:
yes: Supervisors ~'yers, ~1inter, Johnson, Burton, and Park.
ays: None.
A Copy - Teste:
Clerk
Board..!,. f'supe..rv~'.s.. or~ f Roanoke County
/1 ~ ~~
--jj , "'L~' . ~.
u
"'"
503
6-8-82
o'
J
ROANOKE COUNTY SUBDIVISION ADDITION
Date of Resolution:
Date of Acceptance:
!f
c.'~ Of
~A. LIi...
I
Proposed addition shown in red
DESCRIPTION: Shawnee Drive from u.S. Route 11 and 460 to end
LENGTH:
0.12 miles
R/W:
50 feet
SURFACE WIDTH: 24 feet
I
ROADWAY WIDTH: 38 feet
SERVICE:
1 Industry
IMRPVEMENT TO BE MADE: None
RESIDENT ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATION:
Next, Mr. Robertson read aloud his report on adding Flint Road
(Spruce Hill subdivision) to the State secondary system. Supervisor Myers
moved for adoption of the prepared resolution:
I
l,
..,...
,-.....
6-8-82
504
I
AT A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF ROANOKE COUNTY. VIRGINIA,
HELD ON
June 8, 1982
Board of S pervisors
VI
The Publi and the State Highway
Commissi of Virginia
ORDER
. matter came on this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application
for
lint Road from
Rt.771, 0.22 miles to end.
have her
Secti
1
Page
on No
report fr
owners i
ted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways.
I
appearing to the Board that drainage easements and a
50'
right of way for said road
of ore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Spruce Hill
1 , which map was recorded in Plat Book 9
of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia,
mb 1 , and that by reason of the recordation of said map no
a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of rig-ht of way from the abutting property
necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right of way and right for drainage.
N
St. R
t THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that said road known as Flint Road from
773, 0.22 miles to end.
and whic is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this order, be, and the same is hereby established
as a publ road to become a part of the Sfate Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County.
o motion by Supervisor Robert E. Myers and
Ad pted by the following recorded vote:
A
Supervisors Myers. Minter. Johnson, Burton. and Park.
N 5: None.
A Copy - Teste:
Clerk
BoardAf Supervisors of Roanoke County
, /1 ,'-'
,/".1 . / .., , ," /1..
. "'( /.
-P [) Hq~ -t'. I' , - l ~4~.,it;J j'L
I
I
!
i
I
i
I
l
,
I
i-
I
1
~
""-r.t\.;;~ . ,
6-8-82
505
ROANOKE COUNTY SUBDIVISION ADDITION
Date of Resolution:
Date of Acceptance:
4
I
Proposed additions shown in red
DESCRIPTION: Flint Road from its intersection with Shawnee Tail
(St. Rt. 773) to end.
LENGTH: 0.22 mile
R/W: 50 feet
I
ROADWAY WIDTH: 29 feet
SURFACE WIDTH: 20 feet
SERVICE: 3 homes
IMPROVEMENTS NECESSARY: None
RESIDENT ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATIONS:
Finally, Mr. Robertson reviewed his report on adding four roads
in the Carriage Hills subdivision to the State secondary system. Supervisor
Burton moved adoption of the prepared resolutions:
I
~
!!...".,.,
--
-'
I
I
I
f~
6-8-82
506
AT A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA,
HELD ON
June 8, 1982
,
Board 0 Supervisors
va
(
ORDER
The Pu lie and the State Highway
Commi ion of Virp.~ia
I
I
This matter came on this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application
for Bo wood Circle from its intersection with Boxwood Drive.
0.06 iles to its end.
to be a cepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways.
have h
Secti
Pag"
on J
report
owners
It appearing to the Board that drainage easements and II
SO'
right of way for said road
etofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Carriaqe HIlls
n 1 , which map was recorded in Plat Book 9 ,
69 of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County. Virginia,
ne 18, 1980 , and that by reason of the recordation of said map no
"om a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right of way from the abut~lng property
is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right of way and right for drainage.
lOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that said road known as Boxwood Circle from
its i tersection with BoxwoQg~ye, 0.06 miles to its end.
and w~ ch is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this order, be, and the same is hereby established
as a pu lic road to become a part of tire State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County.
n motion by Supervisor Athena E. Burton and
J :lopted by the following recorded vote:
yes: Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Burton, and Park.
8Y5: i~one.
A Copy - Teste:
Clerk
lloarff Supervisors of Roanoke County
;'/~I(? ~~~~
I~
J;;.i"J~.'
507
6-8-82
AT A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA,
HELD ON
June 8, 1982
Board of Supervisors
VI
ORDER
The Public and the State Highway
Commission of Virginia
This matter came on this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the ap
for Boxwood Dr i v
miles to its intersection with Boxwood
to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways.
50'
It appearing to the Board that drainage easements and II
right of way for sa
have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Car r i age H ill
Section 1 , which map was recorded in Plat Book 9
Page 169 , of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, V
-1>}l0 e 18. 198 0 , and that by reason of the recordation of said
report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right of way from the abutting p
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right of way and right for draina
NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that said road known as
from its intersection with~~!nway Drive, 0.10 miles to its
intersection with Boxwood Circle.
road
and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this order, be, and the same is hereby est lished
as a public road to become a part of the STate Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County.
On motion by Supervisor Athena E. Burton and
Adopted by the following recorded vote:
Ayes: Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Burton, and Park.
Nays: None.
A Copy - Teste:
Clerk
Board,/?f Supervisors of Roanoke
/ //;/ /J../fF
,t/::;-;(~,4f (G. N~
-I
,
I
I
ounty
I
I
I
I
I
I
6-8-82
508
AT A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA,
HELD ON
June 8, 1982
Board of
ORDER
VI
The Pub and the State Highway
Commiss n of Virginia
. matter came on this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application
for Fe nway Drive from its intersection with Carriage Hills Drive
0.17 m les to its intersection with Boxwood Drive.
to be ac pted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways.
appearing to the Board that drainage easements and a 5 0 I
right of way for said road
have he tofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Carriage Hi lIs
Sectio 1 9
, which map was recorded in Plat Book
Page 1 9 of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia,
on une 18 , and that by reason of the recordation of said map no
report f m a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right of way from the abutting property
owners necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right of way and right for drainage.
N W, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that said road known as Fernway Drive from
TJr;\lP. 0 17 mi1pc::: Tn its
its in ers
inters ction with Boxwood Drive.
is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this order, be, and the same is hereby established
c road to become a part of the Sfate Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County.
motion by Supervisor Athena E. Burton and
pted by the following recorded vote:
A es: Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Burton, and Park.
N ys: I~one.
A Copy - Teste:
Clerk
Boar~f Supervisors of Roanoke County
~.. r)-~/~
/'1/ /,
f \., -;' (2..L-G,
~
509
6-8-82
AT A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA,
HELD ON
June 8, 1982
Board of Supervisors
VI
ORDER
The Public and the State Highway
Commission of Virginia
nus matter came on this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the a
fur Carriage Hills Drive from its intersect'o
0.33 miles to its intersection wit
to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways.
60'
right of way for
It appearing to the Board that drainage easements and a
id road
have heretofo~e been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Carriage Hill
Sect10n 1 _, which map was recorded in Plat Book 9
Page 169 , of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County. irginia.
on Hune 18, 198 0 . and that by reason of the recordation of said map no
report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right of way from the abutting roperty
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right of way and right for drain e.
NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT ORDERED that said road known as Carriage Hill
from its intersection wi th.1?..t?te _Route 696
intersection with Fprnw~y nRiv~.
and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this order, be, and the same is hereby es blished
as a public road to become a part of tire STate Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke Count
On motion by Supervisor Athena E. Burton and
Adopted by the followbg recorded vote:
Ayes: Supervi sors Myers, 1\1i nter, Johnson, Burton, and Park.
Nays: r'lone,
A Copy - Teste:
Clerk
Board of Supervisors of Roanok
/7_.. /} -j
_~'j/~~4 . //1
County
I
I
j,
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
6-8-82
510
I
ROANOKE COUNTY SUBDIVISION ADDITION
Date of Resolution:
Date of Acceptance:
~
~..3 d. /b
~'o
0"
,'>\
Proposed addition shown 1S red
I
DESCR PTION: (1) Carriage Hills Drive from its intersection with
State Route 696 to its intersection with Fernway Driv .
(2) Fernway Drive from its intersection with Carriage Hil
Drive to its intersection with Boxwood Drive.
(3) Boxwood Drive from its intersection with Fernway Driv
to its intersection with Boxwood Circle.
(4) Boxwood Circle from its intersection with Boxwood
Drive to its end.
LENGT (1) 0.33 miles (2) 0.10 miles
( 2) 0.17 miles ( 3) 0.06 miles
R/W: (1 ) 611 feet ( 3 ) 50 feet
(2 ) 50 feet. ( 4 ) 50 feet
(1) 36 feet (3) 29 feet
( 2) 30 feet ( 4 ) 29 feet
WIDTH: ( 1) 22 feet (3 ) 20 feet
(2 ) 20 feet ( 4 ) 20 feet
SERVI (1) 2 homes ( 3) 3 homes
(2 ) 2 homes ( 4 ) 4 lots
I
BE MADE: None
RESID T ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATIONS:
r 511
6-8-02
The County Engineer then asked permission to report on the
Regional Solid Waste Management Board, an item not on the Supervisors'
agenda. He distributed copies of his report to the Supervisors and briefly
if the County does nothing, the regional landfill will be used up in three
I
went over the main points. Referring to the report, Supervisor Burton said
years; if they spend the money requested for a baler, its life could be
extended to 1994. Chairman Park asked what the land could be used for and
Supervisor Burton asked about the life expectancy if trash were piled up
without the baler. The manager of the regional landfill, Mr. Doug Woodson,
was in the audience and advised that garbage is being buried 85 to 90 feet
deep. He said that if 90 feet of trash were piled above the surface, there
would be no pollution of water. It was stated, that without the baler the
present landfill could be used another 7 or 8 years; Supervisor Burton
pointed out that if that is true, then the $1.5 million to be spend on the
baler would actually be extending the use of the landfill for only a 2 or
3 year period. Chairman Park pointed out that in addition to the cost of
I
the baler there would be the cost of maintenance and operation, additional
I;
employees would have to be added to provide for 24-hour operations at the
landfill. The County Engineer admitted that their consultant has said the
machine could be expected to be down for repair about 20 per cent of the
I< time. Supervisor Minter asked about an incinerator similar to the City of
Salem's. Mr. Robertson advised that Salem has a place to sell their steam;
the County has none. Supervisor Johnson asked if the baler were put into
operation, would the collection fees to citizens increase. The Engineer
replied yes. The idea of recycling was brought up. The Engineer advised he
had visited governmental units, which had attempted recycling but were unable
to make money on it. Chairman Park said the County didn't expect to make
money, that recycling would be for the purpose of saving land. Supervisor
Minter moved that action be deferred to a later date and that the City of
I
Salem be contacted about increased use of their incinerator by the County.
When the discussion of the Regional Solid Waste Management Board's
report was finished, the County Engineer asked that he be allowed to resign
I
I
I
I
I
Ii
~li
as a member of that Board and be replaced by the County Administrator.
Action on Mr. Robertson's request was deferred.
,
6-8-02
512
IN RE:
REPORT ON ADMENDMENTS TO SIGN ORDINANCE
I
}1r. Robert E. Stegall, Chairman of the sub-committee appointed
to study this matter, was present to give their report. He listed the
committee's membership and described their method of proceeding with
their study. He then distributed copies of the committee's recommendations
to the Supervisors ans asked if they had any questions. There was
considerable discussion of the proposal to prohibit signs in agricultural
and residential zone classifications and the maximum size being recommended
and the prohibition of side-by-side and double-decker signs.
I
Supervisor Burton said it was her understanding that the sub-
committee had been appointed for the purpose of comparing the County sign
ordinance with the sign regulations newly adopted by the City of Roanoke and
of studying the impact the City's sign regulations might have on the County.
She said she did not see that this was addressed in the report submitted.
Mr. Stegall replied that the County would have to wait and see what the
impact would be.
Supervisor Myers asked the County Attorney how long it takes to
advertise to enact an ordinance. He was told it takes two weeks, that
notice must be published once a week for two weeks. Supervisor Myers then
moved that the sixty-day moratorium previously authorized and due to
expire 6-13-82 be extended to July 27 and that an ordinance encompassing
the subcommittee's report be put in ordinance form to govern signs in
Roanoke County.
I
Supervisor Burton said the outline transmitting the subcommittee's
recommendations has not had a public hearing before the Planning Commission
and said she would like to see that done and then have the Planning Commissic
prepare the ordinance. Supervisor Burton then asked the County Attorney
about extension of the moratorium to July 27. He said for a special
purpose and for a relatively short period of time, there was no problem,
but he would have grave concerns about extending the sign moratorium beyond
the original sixty-day period, although it was not absolutely illegal to do
so.
1----
~
"...-
6-8-82
~13
Supervisor Burton then made a substitute motion that the sub-
committee's recommendations be sent back to the Planning Commission to draft
a formal ordinance and hold a public hearing and that the original, sixty-
roll call vote:
I
day sign moratorium not be extended. Her motion was adopted by the following
AYES:
Supervisors Johnson, Burton and Park.
NAYS:
Supervisors Myers and Minter
Supervisor Johnson noted that she was voting "Aye" because the
Supervisors had been advised by the County Attorney that the moratorium
should not be extended after June 13.
IN RE:
REPORT OF AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Hr. T. M. "Mickey" White made a report on behalf of this Committee
during the executive session held earlier in this meeting.
I
IN RE:
REPORT OF BID COMMITTEE
Purchasing Supervisor E. D. Fitzgerald read the report on the
proposal to purchase a document processing system which would fold, heat,
and seal documents processed on the County's computer equipment for ultimate
distribution. Supervisor Minter moved for adoption of the prepared
.
resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 3156 ACCEPTING A BID MADE TO THE COUNTY OF
ROANOKE TO FURNISH A DOCUMENT HEAT SEALING SYSTfl1 FOR USE AT
THE COUNTY'S COMPUTER SYSTEM CENTER.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
I
Virginia, as follows:
1. That a certain bid of Standard Register Company in the amount
I
of $8,295.00, being the lowest and best bid received by the County to
furnish a document heat sealing system for use at the County's Computer
System Center, upon all and sin~ular the terns and conditions of the
invitation to bid, the specifications of the County of Roanoke, the
bidder's proposal and the provisions of this resolution, be, and the
sane hereby is ACCEPTED; and
-
2. That the County Adninistrator is hereby authorized and directed
~
-.,
6-0-02
514
to enter into a contract with Standard Register Company upon a form
approved by the County Attorney for this purchase; and
3. That all other bids for the purchase of this equipment are
I
hereby rejected and the County Clerk is directed to so notify such
bidders and express the County's appreciation for the submission of
their bids.
Adopted on motion of Supervisor Minter and the following roll call
vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Burton and Park
NAYS:
None
Mr. Fitzgerald then read the Bid Committee's report on the printing
of voucher checks, payroll checks, payroll stub documents, and welfare
checks for use on the heat sealing system. Supervisor Johnson moved for
adoption of the prepared resolution:
I
RESOLUTION NO. 3157 ACCEPTING A BID MADE TO THE COUNTY OF
ROANOKE FOR THE PRINTING OF CHECKS FOR USE ON A DOCUMENT HEAT
SEALING SYSTEM.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That a certain bid of Standard Register Company in the amount
of $4,187.86, being the lowest and best bid received by the County for
the printing of voucher checks, payroll checks, payroll stub documents
and Welfare checks for use on a document heat sealing system, upon all
and singular the terms and conditions of the invitation to bid, the
specifications of the County of Roanoke, the bidder's proposal and the
provisions of this resolution, be, and the same hereby is accepted; and
2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed
to enter into a contract with Standard Register Company upon a form
I
approved by the County Attorney for this purchase; and
3. That all other bids for this purchase are hereby rejected and
the County Clerk is directed to so notify such bidders and express the
County's appreciation for the submission of their bids.
Adopted on motion of Supervisor Johnson and the following recorded
I
.1
I.
vote:
AYES: Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Burton, and Park.
-
NAYS:
None
~
,...
6-8-82
515
The Purchasing Supervisor then read the report on awarding a
typewriter maintenance contract for the 1982-83 fiscal year. Supervisor
Johnson noted that the School Board's equipment is included in the proposed
contract and since the inventory shows only 99 machines, she asked why the
I
classroom typewriters were not included. I1r. Fitzgerald responded that
the students used the typewriter for only 9 months a year, while the office
typewriters got harder use for 12 months a year. It was not felt that annual
maintenance was necessary for the student typewriters. Supervisor Johnson
then moved for adoption of the prepared resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 3153 ACCEPTING A BID MADE TO THE COUNTY OF
ROANOKE FOR FOR A TYPEWRITER MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR ALL
COUNTY OWNED TYPEWRITERS.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That a certain bid of B & D Office Machines in the amount of
$30.50 per machine for a one year contract covering all County owned
typewriters, being the lowest and best bid received by the County, upon
all and singular the terms and conditions of the invitation to bid, the
I
specifications of the County of Roanoke, the bidder's proposal and the
provisions of this resolution, be, and the same hereby is accepted; and
,!
2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed
to enter into a one year contract with B & D Office Machines upon a form
,
approved by the County Attorney; and
3. That all other bids for this service are hereby rejected and
the County Clerk is directed to so notify such bidders and express the
county's appreciation for the submission of their bids.
Adopted on motion of Supervisor Johnson and the following recorded
vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Myers, ~1inter, Johnson, Burton, and Park.
NAYS:
None
I
IN RE:
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIOlJS AND ORDINANCES
On motion by Supervisor Gary J. Minter the following prepared
resolution was adopted:
I--
~!
~
6-8-82
516
Resolution Number 3159
On motion made by Supervisor Gary James Minter, the General
Appropriation Resolution of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 23, 1981,
I
be, and is the same hereby amended as follows to become effective June
8, 1982:
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NUMBER
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
Class:
Fund:
Dept:
Object:
Object:
Expenditures
General
Planning & Zoning
Tires, Tubes & Parts
Photo Copies
03-6-08100-54080
03-6-08100-54013
$ 25
$625
Dept:
Object:
Planning Commission
Dinner Meeting
03-6-08101-55041
($650)
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Burton, and Park.
NAYS:
None
I
IN RE:
HEARING OF CITIZENS
There was no response when Chairman Park asked if there was
anyone present with business to bring before the Board.
IN RE:
REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
Supervisor Johnson reported to the Board that on Memorial Day
she received calls about there being no flag flying over the Courthouse.
She asked the County Attorney if it would be necessary to adopt a resolution
requiring the flag to be flown on State and National holidays. He replied
that no resolution was necessary, that adoption of a motion to that effect
would make such a rule County policy. Supervisor Johnson then moved that
I
the U. S. Flag be flown on all holidays and other appropriate times, except
in inclement weather, at the County Courthouse and the new Roanoke County
Administration Center. Her motion was adopted by a unanimous voice vote.
Supervisor Minter mentioned that Commissioner of the Revenue
Wayne Compton and Business License Inspector Sylvia Faw presented items of
County jewelry to Governor Robb and Attorney General Ba1i1es during the
-
~
517
6-8-[;2
past weekend.
Supervisor Park asked County Planner Timothy W. Gubala for an
answer to his previous inquiry about a woman living in the City of Roanoke
and paying County taxes. Mr. Gubala apologized for not having an answer
ready.
I
Mr. Park then asked for a motion from one of the other Supervisors.
He explained that the sale of a house is being held up because during the
title search it was discovered that a corner of the house was built over a
drainage easement.
The real estate company had asked for the County's
help in expeditiously having the easement vacated. Supervisor Minter
moved that the proposed vacation of a drainage easement on a lot at 2641
Parkwood Drive (Lindenwood subdivision) be referred to the Planning
Commission for a recommendation. His motion was adopted by a unanimous
voice vote.
IN RE:
EXECUTIVE SESSION
I
At 8:52 p.m., Supervisor Hinter moved that the Board go into
executive session, pursuant to Section 2.l-344(a)(1), (2), and (6) of the
Code of Virginia, to discuss personnel, real estate, and legal matters.
His motion was adopted by a unanimous voice vote.
IN RE:
RETURN TO OPEN SESSION
On motion by Supervisor Johnson to return to open session at
9:35 p.m.; Supervisor Myers made a motion to authorize the hiring of two
planning interns for this summer at a cost not to exceed $4,500, said amount
to be allocated from the 1982-83 Salary Contingent Fund and that Mr. Gubala
be directed to initiate the interview process on June 9th.
IN RE:
ADJOURNMENT
I
On motion by Supervisor Myers the meeting was adjourned at 9:40 p. .
w