8/10/1982 - Regular
~
8-10-82
50
I
I ,
,
i
,
i
1
il
;
,
I
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Salem-Roanoke County Civic Center
Salem, Virginia
August 10, 1982
The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this
day in open session at the Salem-Roanoke County Civic Center in Salem,
Virginia, this being the second Tuesday and the first regular meeting of
the month of August, 1982.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chairman Athena E. Burton and Supervisors May W.
Johnson, Gary James Minter, Robert E. Myers, and
Harry C. Nickens.
MEMBERS ABSENT:
None
IN RE:
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Burton called the meeting to order at 6:10 p.m.
Supervisor Johnson immediately moved to go into executive session, pursuant
to Section 2.l-344(a) (1), (2), and (6) of the Code of Virginia, to
discuss personnel, real estate, and legal matters. Her motion was adopted
by a unanimous voice vote.
IN RE:
RETURN TO OPEN SESSION
At 7:07 p.m. the Supervisors returned to the meeting room and,
on motion by Supervisor Hinter, voted unanimously to return to open session.
Chairman Burton advised those present that the Supervisors had been
i,
meeting informally from 4:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., checking the progress at
, the future County Administrative Office building, and that they had been
in executive session since 6:10 p.m. discussing real estate.
IN RE:
INVOCATION/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Chair then recognized the Reverend Samuel W. Crews, of the
Coopers Cove Baptist Church, who offered the invocation. The pledge of
allegiance to the flag was then recited in unison by all present.
,...
; 1 .
8-10--82
IN RE:
INFORMATION ITEMS
Supervisor Johnson moved that the following items be received and
filed; her motion was adopted by a unanimous voice vote:
(1) Letter from State Water Control Board giving notice of a
I
hearing in Richmond in September on amendments to the State impounding
regulations.
(2) Two letters from the State Highway Department advising that
Dorset Drive, Old Manor Drive, and Dairy Road have been accepted into the
Secondary System.
(3) Report from State Highway Department entitled "Final
Allocation of Funds Fiscal Year 1982-83 Interstate, Primary, and Urban
Systems and Public Transit"
(4) Accounts paid for June, 1982.
(5) Roanoke County Employees' Health Plan Report for June, 1982.
I,
IN RE:
PUBLIC HEARINGS
I
APPLICATION OF RODNEY W. BOHON FOR A SPECIAL *
EXCEPTION PERMIT TO PARK A MOBILE HOME, TO BE *
OCCUPIED BY HIS DAUGHTER, CHERYLE J. BOHON, ON*
A 3-ACRE TRACT ON THE SOUTHWEST SIDE OF STATE *
ROUTE 734, ABOUT 500 FEET \lliST FROM STATE * APPROVED
ROUTE 639 IN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT *
Mr. Bohon was present for this public hearing; there was no
opposition. Supervisor Myers moved that the request be approved, subject
to the provisions of the County Zoning Ordinance as it pertains to mobile
homes. His motion was adopted by a unanimous voice vote.
APPLICATION OF RONDA PHILLIPS FOR A HOME *
OCCUPATION PERMIT TO CONDUCT A CONSill1ER *
ADVOCATE OFFICE IN A RESIDENCE ON PROPERTY *
OWNED BY JOAN NEIGHBORS AND LOCATED EAST OFF *
TvlliLVE O'CLOCK KNOB ROAD (STATE ROUTE 694) *
ABOUT 3.85 MILES FROM ROUTE 221 IN WINDSOR * APPROVED
HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. *
I
Mrs. Phillips was present for this public hearing; there was no
opposition. Supervisor Johnson moved that the permit be granted for two
years. tier motion was adopted by a unanimous voice vote.
-
l
~
8-10-82
~
L.:.. ~,J
..r .......
APPLICATION OF LYNN R. CREASY FOR A HOME
OCCUPATION PERMIT TO CONDUCT A ONE-CHAIR
BEAUTY SHOP IN HER HOME AT 5571 CAPITO
STREET, N.E. IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL
DISTRICT.
";~
*
i"
* CONTINUED
i~
I
Ms. Creasy was present for this public hearing. Two women were
present in opposition to this request. Betty Fuller of 6064 Loch Haven
Drive stated that she operates a beauty shop on Williamson Road. She
further stated that Ms. Creasy was a former employee whose home is behind
Mrs. Fuller's shop. She also advised that Ms. Creasy had been seeing
Ms. Fuller's customers in her home while she still worked in Mrs. Fuller's
shop and that the only reason she had applied for a permit was that Ms.
Fuller had let her go, the matter had come to the County's attention, and
she had to get a permit to continue to work in her home.
Supervisor Myers asked what the requirements for a home occupation
permit for a beauty shop were, such as health laws, sanitary laws, etc.
County Planner Timothy W. Gubala and County Attorney James E. Buchholtz
advised that the laws are the same; neither was sure about fire code
I
regulations. Mr. Gubala advised a certificate of occupancy was issued
by the Building Inspector at the same time as the business license.
Supervisor Myers said he had received many complaints about shops in homes
competing with businesses and not having to comply with the same laws.
Supervisor Minter asked about how many other home-occupation beauty shops
there were in the County; the County Planner replied there were at least
ten. Mr. Gubala said he was not familiar with health and electrical
requirements for home beauty shops.
Ms. Ann Bailey spoke next and identified herself as the owner of a
beauty shop on Peters Creek Road. She felt all beauty shop operators
should have to comply with the same rules and regulations. She said she
knew of several shops in homes which do not have permits to operate and
I
which do not comply with the rules. She further said the operators of
home beauty shops do not get permits until complaints are received by the
County. She questioned the aspect of taxes to the County -- no business
license, the utility rate is different for homes and businesses, phone
bills are higher, and so are water rates. She also questioned how much
of the income produced in home beauty shops was reported to the IRS.
~
"...
8-10-82
!"" 3
;) It
Chairman Burton felt some valid questions had been raised, and
Supervisor Minter moved to hold Ms. Creasy's request over and asked the
staff to respond to the questions raised, including the safety aspects.
Supervisor Nickens asked why the staff had recommended approval of Ms.
Creasy's permit for two years. He was told the recommendation came from
the Planning staff and that it did not cover the questions addressed during
this hearing. Supervisor Minter's motion to continue this application was
adopted by a unanimous voice vote.
APPLICATION OF RICHARD RIDER FOR A USE NOT *
PROVIDED FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE A WRECKER *
SERVICE AND SECURITY IMPOUND ON STATE ROUTE *
773, NORTH OF INTERSTATE 81 AND BEHIND DIXIE * APPROVED
CAVERNS IN THE CATAUBA HAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. i~
Mr. Rider was present for this public hearing; there was no
opposition. Supervisor Myers moved that the application be approved; his
motion was adopted by a unanimous voice vote.
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
~
I
APPLICATION OF DANIEL N. SUGGS FOR A SPECIAL *
USE PERMIT TO ALLOW OPERATION OF A BORROW PIT *
ON A 3.25-ACRE TRACT ON THE EAST SIDE OF STATE*
ROUTE 643, BETWEEN ONE-HALF AND ONE-QUARTER * CONDITIONAL
MILE NORTH OF INTERSTATE 81 WEST OF SALEM IN * APPROVAL
THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. *
Mr. Suggs was present for this public hearing and said that he
is in the excavating business. He said that a Mr. Martin has been passing
around in the neighborhood an erroneous notice, which says t1r. Suggs will
be doing things that he has no intention of doing. He advised he had
purchased the property for the purpose of providing himself with fill dirt.
lIe plans to lower the slope of the property, but not below the level of
the road. Supervisor Myers asked how many trucks Mr. Suggs owns; he
replied he has only one truck and that he would be doing his own hauling.
He also said after the property is graded down he plans either to re-seed
it or permit its use for sardening.
Mr. Frank Cordy Haxey (Route 1, Box 198, Salem) was present in
support of Mr. Suggs's request. He advised he is an adjoining property
owner, is familiar with what }lr. Suggs plans to do, and is in favor of it.
The next speaker was Mr. John H. Kennett, Jr., attorney
representing Hr. A. C. Martin, who opposes Hr. Suggs's request. Mr.
,
,
~I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
~
8-10-82
54
Kennett presented petitions signed by persons also opposed to this
application. Chairman Burton pointed out that no addresses were given on
the petitions; Mr. Kennett said all the signators lived within one mile of
I
the borrow pit site. Mr. Kennett further advised that the State Code
provides that anyone disturbing an area as large as 10,000 square feet,
must comply with the State's soil erosion regulations. He also said the
Roanoke County soil erosion and sediment control ordinance requires that
a plat be filed showing the contours of the property and that this has
not been done. Mr. Kennett did not feel this special use permit should be
issued because none of the requirements have been complied with and area
residents have only Mr. Suggs's word for what he is going to do on the
property.
Mr. Kennett then said he would introduce Mr. James A. Hall, a
~
retired engineer from the State Highway Department. Before Mr. Hall spoke,
Chairman Burton asked the County Attorney about the statutes referred to.
The County Attorney replied that the County does have an erosion and
sediment control ordinance which followed the State statute in effect at
I
the time of adoption. However, amendments have been made which create more
stringent requirements effective March 1 of this year. Roanoke County has
not adopted a new ordinance, but anyone applying for a permit becomes
subject to the new State law. The Attorney further stated that whether
or not the requested special use permit is granted, Mr. Suggs still has
to comply with the requirements of the State law.
Mr. Kennett stated large amounts of soil have already been
removed and, therefore, the soil erosion ordinance had already been violated.
Supervisor Myers asked Mr. Suggs if excavation is being done now. He
replied that it was not, that the County had told him to stop and he had.
Supervisor Myers then asked Mr. Suggs if the permit were granted, would he
comply with the erosion ordinance; Mr. Suggs replied that he would, to the
I
letter.
County Attorney Buchholtz felt it was important that the Super-
visors should know that the reason Mr. Suggs applied for a permit was that
County staff had sent him a notice to stop doing the work. Mr. Buchholtz
wanted those present to know the County had not ignored the situation.
County Engineer R. E. Robertson was then called upon. He said that three
---
I
I~
"...
;5
.
8-10-82
or four weeks ago, when he became aware of the situation, he went to
investigate. He said the soil erosion and sediment control ordinance
provides that he can grant a waiver if no erosion is present. ~ihen he
investigated, he found a band of foliage around the site and there was no
I
siltation into the road or creek. He said he did not feel a plan was
necessary unless the band of foliage were breached and erosion began. He
further stated that if submission of a plan became necessary, it must be
filed with the County Engineer, who determined how detailed it must be
and how the applicant must proceed to comply with the law to prevent
erosion. Chairman Burton asked Mr. Suggs if he would be willing to submit
II
I:
such a plan, and Supervisor Myers asked if anyone else wished to speak.
Mr. Robert Wilcher (Route 1, Box 190, Salem) said he lived within
Ii 100 yards of the borrow pit site and that he had no objection to Mr.
Suggs's request. He felt that Mr. Suggs should be able to make a living.
I:
Ii
Hr. James A. Hall (381 Ingal Boulevard, Salem) spoke in opposition
,:
to the request. He said he had been in construction for 55 years and that
borrow pits always created a mess. He said the residents on Ingal Boulevard
I
have to use the road the pit is on to get to U.S. Route 11/460 and that
he has already seen problems with dust. Hr. Haxey countered that only four
families from Ingal Boulevard use the road. Mr. Robert Gilcrease (no
address given) said there were nice homes in the area and he didn't feel
a borrow pit should be placed among them; he asked if anyone present would
want one next to their homes.
Supervisor Myers said he didn't think Mr. Suggs's operation
would actually be a borrow pit, that dirt would be removed and the slope
leveled out. He also said he had looked at the site and did not consider it
a borrow pit. Chairman Burton asked Mr. Suggs how long it would be before
he seeded the area; he replied that he planned to seed the first section
Johnson asked if he was operating a borrow pit; he said no, that a slope is
I
within about two months after the use permit was issued. Supervisor
being graded and leveled and that when he is finished, the property will
be about five feet above the road and would slope into the road.
Mildred Daugherty spoke next and said she lives on State Route
643 and travels the road every day to work. She said when Mr. Suggs was
-
moving dirt, the road was covered with it; also said the road is narrow
l
I
I
I
~
8-10-82
56
and that upon occasion she had had to stop because Mr. Suggs's truck
was parked in the roadway. She asked for assurance this would not happen
in the future.
Martha Ulrey (Route 1, Salem) said she, too, lives on Route 643
and is next to the borrow pit. She said there was no mess on the road and
no mud.
Supervisor Myers moved that the special use permit be granted
for a two-year period on the conditions that Mr. Suggs live up to the
requirements of the State and County Codes, that he put top soil on each
section as he grades and finishes it and seed it, that he live up to all
other requirements of the Codes, and that his plans be approved before
work re-commences. His motion was adopted by a unanimous voice vote.
PETITION OF ANDREW J. ROBERTSON REQUESTING *
REZONING FROM M-l TO B-2 OF A LOT AT 3201 *
VALLEY FORGE AVENUE, S.W. IN THE CAVE SPRING*
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT TO PEID1IT OPERATION OF *
A RETAIL SPECIALTY STORE SELLING SNACK FOODS'~
AND RELATED ITEMS. *
CONDITIONAL
APPROVAL
Mr. Craig K. Gould, lessee of Mr. Robertson's property and the
!
operator of the specialty store, was present as spokesman for this request. I
No one was present in opposition. Supervisor Johnson asked for
clarification of the proffered condition. Mr. Gould asked if he changed
to another type of business (one also permitted in B-2 zoning) would the
proffered condition affect his ability to make such a change. The County
Attorney read the proffered condition aloud and said that if the "tenant,"
Craig Gould, discontinued doing business on the premises, the zoning
classification would revert to M-l. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve
the requested rezoning on the condition that the classification would
revert to M-l if the current tenant leaves or stops operating a business
that falls in the B-2 zoning classification. Her motion was adopted
by a unanimous voice vote.
I
I
i
ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE III SHOOTING
MATCHES OF CHAPTER 4 AMUSE}lENTS OF THE
ROANOKE COUNTY CODE.
* CONTINUED TO .
,
,'~ AUGUST 24, 1982! !
r
~
,~
~
8-10-82
57
County Attorney James E. Buchholtz acted as spokesman and advised
that several months ago a question came up regarding shooting matches in the
County. The County Code was not clear, and the Supervisors had directed
the County Attorney and County Planner to re-draft the provisions so they
I
would be understandable. This ordinance is the result of their efforts.
Regarding the provision in the proposed ordinance that written approval of
the Sheriff be required before the Supervisors issued a permit for an
outdoor shooting match, the County Attorney suggested that this be amended
to provide that the Sheriff investigate the applicant(s) and recommend
to the Supervisors whether a permit should be issued by the Supervisors.
Chairman Burton asked about fencing or barriers in the area of the shooting
match. The Attorney replied they did not consider requiring the range to
be fenced. Chairman Burton said she felt this should be a condition, and
the Attorney said this could be made a condition before a permit was issued.
Supervisor Myers said that since the County Attorney had second thoughts, he
would move that this matter be held over to the next meeting for written
comments from the Attorney and the County Sheriff since he had not been
I
involved in preparation of this ordinance. Chairman Burton called for
further discussion; there was no response. The motion to continue this
matter to the next regular Board meeting was adopted by a unanimous voice
vote.
IN RE:
PUBLICATION OF DELINQUENT REAL ESTATE TAX LIST (1979)
At this point in the meeting, Chairman Burton deviated from the
prepared agenda to recognize County Treasurer Alfred C. Anderson, who
was present to request authorization from the Supervisors to publish in a
local newspaper a list of delinquent real estate taxes for 1979. Mr.
58-983 of the State Code and that it must be done prior to December 5, 1982;
I
Anderson advised that publication of this list is provided for in Section
he said that in previous years, the list has been published in November.
Supervisor Johnson asked what kind of response is received after publication.
Mr. Anderson replied there is a good response. Supervisor Minter moved to
grant permission to publish the list. Ris motion was adopted by a unanimous
----
voice vote.
~I,
8-10-82
58
IN RE:
DISCUSSION OF VERNDALE DRIVE
The Supervisors had before them a letter from Mr. M. H. Cox
of 6008 Plantation Road requesting an opportunity to discuss the condition
I
of Verndale Drive. Supervisor Minter said he has received more calls about
the two-block section of Verndale Drive since he has been a Supervisor
than on any other issue. He said the County is caught between the
State Highway Department and the developer. Chairman Burton asked that
citizens limit their remarks to no more than three minutes.
M. H. Cox spoke first and asked three questions, which he
directed to Chairman Burton:
(1) if she could give any information to
home owners as to ownership of the two-block section of road; (2) what
could be done to improve the road on a temporary basis; and (3) was
any action anticipated in the immediate future to get holes patched.
Chairman Burton responded that the Supervisors are aware of the problems
and the home owners' displeasure and have the situation under investigation.
I
Ralph Hart of 5969 Village Lane spoke next and referred to a
permit to build townhouses which was to have included construction of a
road with a slow-down lane. Mr. Hart said that W. E. Cundiff (developer
OF the Plantation Village subdivision, the location of this stretch of
street) is actively engaged in the construction business in the County.
Chairman Burton told Mr. Hart that the original permit for the townhouses
had provisions that were approved at the time, but since then the Highway
Department has refused to accept the solution to the problem of storm
water runoff, which was approved in 1973. Mr. Hart asked if one part of
the permit was no longer acceptable, would the other conditions not have
to be complied with. He also suggested closing the road. Chairman Burton
replied it had been donated as a public right of way and it might be hard
to close the road.
I
Dennis Shaver of 5962 Village Lane spoke next and stressed the
danger to drivers using the road. He said he had been disturbed in the
middle of the night by persons needing help getting their cars back in the
road. He said the road is very dangerous and raised the question of who
would be liable in the case of injury.
Steven Emick of 5753 Capito Street said he used to travel
~
I
!
~
~
8-10-82
59
I'
Verndale, but had had to find an alternate route. He asked what options
are being considered. Chairman Burton said she was not sure what they
all are. Mr. Emick said the road is the worst he has ever experienced
and commented that the freezing and thawing to be expected in the fall
and winter will make the road worse.
Chairman Burton called on County Engineer R. E. Robertson to
present his report to the Supervisors on Plantation Village, which had been
scheduled for later on this agenda. Mr. Robertson agreed that the road is
in deplorable condition and said it is an important road connecting
Plantation Road and Florist Road. He then read his report.
Supervisor Minter asked who owns the land. He was told it is
owned by the BSR Corporation at the same address as Cundiff Construction,
but there is a recorded deed wherein Cundiff, Inc. conveyed the land to the
Highway Department. The County Attorney said the road was dedicated, by
legal instrument, by W. E. Cundiff Construction Company, Inc. to the State
of Virginia. Roads are normally dedicated to the County and then taken
over by the State at the request of the County. He said this road is owned
by the Commonwealth of Virginia, but this does not answer the question of
who has the responsibility of fixing it. Under law, dedication of the
road to the Commonwealth of Virginia does not raise any obligation,
responsibility, or duty to the Commonwealth to maintain the road. There
has been no official acceptance of the road by the Commonwealth.
Maintenance is still the responsibility of W. E. Cundiff Construction Company
Inc. The Resident Engineer of the State Highway Department said the State
has not accepted the road although the dedication is valid and it is a
I
I
public street.
The County Attorney stated that who owns the street is not
crucial; who has responsibility for maintenance is the main point.
Chairman Burton asked about the legal liability for injury. The
Attorney said a judge would have to decide, it could be either the Common-
wealth of Virginia or the persons who dedicated the street.
Chairman Burton thanked the persons in the audience who had come
for this discussion. Supervisor Minter asked the County Engineer if holes
could be filled in. Mr. Robertson replied there were no County funds
available and that tl,e State Highway Department would not do it because if
I
---
~I
I
I
I
'-
~
8-10-82
60
they did it the first time, they would be accepting the street and
responsibility for its maintenance.
Supervisor Minter moved that the Supervisors direct the County
Attorney and Engineer to make a report on the ownership and liability;
history of transactions, including the State; and each party's legal
responsibilities and options within thirty days.
Supervisor Nickens asked why nothing had been done before the
regulations changed so that the State Highway Department and Water Control
Board would not have refused acceptance.
An unidentified member of the audience said snow is removed
from the road in winter; he did not know whether by the State or a
private contractor. Carl H. Kalstrom of 238 Verndale Drive said the
Verndale Drive situation is a real problem and something should be done
about it. He suggested a joint effort from Cundiff Construction, the
State, and County.
Supervisor Minter's motion was adopted by a unanimous voice
vote.
At this point in the meeting, Chairman Burton deviated from
the order of the prepared agenda to consider the County Engineer's reports
on having Bradshaw Road (Mason Village subdivision) and Mountain Park Drive
(north off Westward Lake Drive) declared rural additions. Supervisor Myers
moved adoption of the following prepared resolution: I
RESOLUTION NO. 3196 DECLARING CERTAIN STREETS, HIGHWAYS, OR
ROADS LOCATED IN ROANOKE COUNTY AS RURAL ADDITIONS AS ~UillE AND
PROVIDED BY LAtJ
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That a certain portion of a certain street known as Bradshaw
Road in the Mason Village Subdivision situate in the Catawba Magisterial
District, being a section of such road approximately 1,250 feet in
length between State Secondary Road 864 and Virginia Primary Route 311,
is hereby declared as a rural addition pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1
(Cl) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and
f--
II~
,...
8-10-82
t) 1 ~
2. That a certain portion of a certain street known as Mountain
Park Drive in the Westward Lake Estates Subdivision extending from the
terminus of State Secondary Road 1146 in a northerly direction approximately
0.14 miles is hereby declared as a rural addition pursuant to Section
I
33.1-72.1 eCl) of the 1950 Code of Vireinia, as amended; and
3. That an attested copy of this resolution be forthwith forwarded
to the State Department of Highways and Transportation.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Nickens, and Burton.
NAYS:
None
Supervisor Myers thanked the citizens present who had an interest
in the adoption of this resolution for coming to the meeting.
I
Ii
IN RE:
APPLICATION OF BENT MOUNTAIN HOMAN'S CLUB FOR RAFFLE PERMIT
Ii
No one was present to act as spokesman for this request; neither
I
was there anyone present in opposition. Hithout further discussion,
I:
Supervisor Johnson moved that the permit be issued. Her motion was adopted
by a unanimous voice vote.
IN RE:
LETTER FROM SOCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT RE: HITCB:ING POST HOME
FOR ADULTS
Chairman Burton asked if there were any questions or comments
on this correspondence. Supervisor Johnson said it had been a good idea
for the County to become involveu in the complaints presented by the
residents near the Hitching Post home for Adults, that some of the problems
had been solved. The County Administrator was directed to research the
State Code to see if area residents should have been notified that this
I
facility was going into their neighborhood. If notification is not
presently required, it was suggested that the County's representatives in
the General AssePclbly might be asked to offer an amendment to the Code.
-
~
..,
8-10-82
62 !
I
IN RE:
USE OF PART B, FLOW-THROUGH FUNDS DURING FISCAL YEAR 1982-83
This letter was received and filed without discussion.
I
IN RE:
TAXATION BY COUNTIES OF MEALS AND LODGING
The Supervisors had before them a letter from the Administrator
of James City County urging the Board to have a representative in Richmond
on August 11th for the meeting of the General Assembly's Joint Subcommittee
Studying Local Taxation of Meals and Lodgings. Chairman Burton commented
that Roanoke County would be represented. County Administrator Donald R.
Flanders told those present that during the calendar year 1981, $26,313,000
in taxable meals were served in Roanoke County and that a 1 per cent tax
would have brought $263,000 in revenue to the County.
I
IN RE:
APPOINTMENT OF COUNTY REPRESENTATIVES - FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT
COMMISSION
The Supervisors had before them a letter from the Executive
Director of the Fifth Planning District Commission acknowledging the
County's action to re-join the Commission and suggesting the appointment
of County representatives to the Commission. Supervisors Johnson and
Burton volunteered to serve and Supervisor Minter offered to, also. There
are to be both elected and citizen representatives on the Commission and
the appointments are for staggered terms.
(1) For a three-year term expiring June 30, 1985:
elected representative - Supervisors Chairman Athena E. Burton
who was appointed on motion by
Supervisor Myers approved by voice
vote with Supervisor Burton abstainin
I
citizen representative - Lee B. Eddy (2211 Pommel Drive,SH)
who was nominated by Chairman Burton
and approved by a unanimous voice vot
(2) For a two-year term expiring June 30, 1984:
elected representative - Supervisor May W. Johnson who was
appointed on motion by Supervisor
Hyers and a unanimous voice vote
citizen representative - I-Jayne E. Wray (3905 Bandy Rd. ,SE.
who was nominated by Supervisor
Nickens and approved by a unanimous
voice vote.
~.
I~
r
t) 3 ·
8-10-82
(3) For a one-year term expirin8 June 30, 1983:
elected representative - Supervisor Nickens who was appointed
on motion by Supervisor Minter and a
unanimous voice vote.
(4) Executive Committee: On motion by Supervisor Minter, adopted
by a unanimous voice vote, Supervisors
Burton and Johnson were appointed to serve
on the Executive Committee of the Fifth
Planning District Commission
I
Supervisor Johnson then moved adoption of the following prepared
appropriation resolution, which covers membership in the Commission:
Resolution Number 3197
I
On motion made by Supervisor Johnson, the General Appropriation
I:
Resolution of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 22, 1982 be, and is
the same hereby amended as follows to become effective August 10, 1982:
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NUMBER
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
Class:
Fund:
Dept:
Object:
Expenditures
General Operating
Planning & Zoning
Membership - Fifth Planning
District Commission 03-6-08100-56050
$12,984
I
Dept:
Unappropriated Balance
03-6-99999-99999
(12,984)
Adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Johnson, Nickens, and Burton
NAYS:
Supervisor Myers.
At this point in the meeting, the Chairman deviated from the
prepared agenda to recognize Danny B. Bolt from the architecture and
engineering firm of VVKR, Incorporated. Chairman Burton told Mr. Bolt
the Supervisors were impressed by the progress that has been made at the
former Mount Vernon school when they inspected it at 4:30 this date. The
Supervisors had before them a list of items related to renovation of the
I
school which either were not budgeted for or which were under-estimated.
Mr. Bolt went over two or three of the costlier items and explained the
reasons for the increased costs; he advised that the overall percentage
of overrun was 8 per cent for the whole project thus far. He also stated
that the sums shown were maximum figures and actual costs might be less.
-
~
8-10-32
l
64
Supervisor Myers moved that approval be given to the list of additions
and overruns, subject to bids being secured on some of the work and further
moved that the County Administrator be authorized to approve resulting
I
change orders. The County Attorney advised that the Supervisors would
have to approve the bids and set them forth in the change orders. SupervisoI
Myers's motion was adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Nickens, and Burton.
NAYS:
None
IN RE:
MEETING TO REVIEW FINAL DRAWINGS OF NEW ROANOKE COUNTY COURTHOUSE
Mr. Bolt then asked the Supervisors to choose a date and time
to meet with him this month to review the final drawings of the new
County Courthouse. He advised that Judge F. L. Hoback, Sr., Chief Judge
of the Circuit Court, has stated that the drawings meet their needs and
I
specifications. After brief consultation among the Supervisors, it was
agreed to meet with Mr. Bolt at 4:00 p.m. on August 24, 1982, at the
Salem-Roanoke County Civic Center for this purpose.
Supervisor Myers then mentioned water leaks affecting the outside
bricks at the Roanoke County-Salem jail and reminded Mr. Bolt that he had
raised this question before. Mr. Bolt replied that it is a tricky problem.
His firm and the contractor have been and are investigating and still are
not sure what is causing the problem; he expected to be able to say within
the next two weeks. Supervisor Myers asked if the bond was still good.
Mr. Bolt replied that it was still in effect and its duration is long
enough to cover correction of the problem; he said everyone connected with
the jail construction was advised of the situation prior to expiration of
the warranty.
I
IN RE:
REPORTS OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
First, the County Administrator responded to a memorandum he
had received from Supervisor Minter outlining a problem Mr. Hal Cobble
(5123 Remington Road, SW) was having getting authorization to leave an
!
j
I-
I
,
I
I
l~
existing sign on County-owned property. The Administrator advised the
,....--
65'"
8-10-82
situation had been discussed with the County Planner. The Planning staff
is to contact the Highway Department to allow Mr. Cobble's sign to stay
until the County Board can establish a policy covering such requests.
The
County Planner and the Administrator are working on a recommendation to
the Board.
I
:
Regarding the Administrator's memorandum to the Supervisors
concerning long-term care, Supervisor Minter asked what long-term care
consists of. Director of Social Services, Betty M. Lucas was present for
this meeting and responded that this is a program designed to prevent
unnecessary institutionalization of the elderly. Mrs. Lucas said there is
presently a lot of fragmentation of the services and the concept was designed
to prevent such situations and it is hoped that by 1983 there will be a
plan to coordinate these services. Chairman Burton asked if the Fifth
Planning District staff could assist; Mrs. Lucas replied that they probably
could. Supervisor Johnson moved for establishment of a Long-Term Care
Council and directed that the County Department of Social Services act as
lead agency in the establishment of long-term care policies. The County
Attorney suggested referring the matter to his office for development of
an appropriate resolution. Supervisor Johnson so moved and her motions
were adopted by a unanimous voice vote.
The County Administrator continued his oral report by advising
that he and School Superintendent Bayes E. Wilson have established a task
force from each agency to study how they can cooperate in the areas of
vehicle maintenance, insurance, radio maintenance, etc. He advised that
John R. Hubbard, S. A. Cable, and Johrr M. Chambliss, Jr., R. E. Robertson
and Roy Nester are the members of the County's task force.
The Administrator has talked to William J. Paxton, Jr., Salem
City Manager, and Doug Woodson, manager of the Regional Landfill, and has
a meeting with them scheduled before August 24th. The matter of the baler
will be considered by the Solid Waste ~1anagement Board on August 25th.
The County Administrator then distributed to the Supervisors
a release from the Tayloe-Murphy Institute containing their population
estimates and projections.
I
I
-
~
~
8-10-82
'6,6
IN RE:
REPORT OF COUNTY ATTORNEY
The County Attorney requested an executive session to discuss
legal matters within the jurisdiction of the public body.
I
IN RE:
REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
In the absence of the Director of Finance, his report was
presented by Jack L. Johnson, Chief Accountant. The subject of the report
was a livestock claim submitted by W. L. Turner for two calves killed by
stray dogs. The Animal Control Officer investigated the incident and could
not find the owner of the dogs. Supervisor Minter moved that Mr. Turner
be reimbursed as recommended in the Finance Director's report; his motion
was adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Nickens, and Burton.
NAYS:
None
I
IN RE:
REPORT OF SOCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Mrs. Betty M. Lucas, Superintendent of the Social Services
Department, was present and briefly outlined her request for an additional
appropriation to supplement funding for employment in sheltered workshops.
She advised that, if approved, the funds would be divided equally between
the Center for Human Development and Tinker Mountain Workshop. Supervisor
Myers moved adoption of the following prepared appropriation resolution:
Resolution Number 3198
On motion made by Supervisor Myers, the General Appropriation
Resolution of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 22, 1982 be, and is
I
the same hereby amended as follows to become effective August 10, 1982:
DESCRIPTIONS
ACCOUNT NUMBER
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
Class:
Fund:
Dept:
Object:
Expenditures
General Operating
Social Services
Purchased Services
03-6-05302-57110
$22,693
Class:
Fund:
Source:
Revenues
General Operating
Welfare Grant
03-5-24010-00000
$22,693
t--
I
I
I~
r
8-10-82
61 "
Adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Nickens, and Burton.
None
I
IN RE:
REPORTS OF BID COMMITTEE
Purchasing Supervisor E. D. Fitzgerald read the report on awarding
a contract for bulk trash container service and asked if the Supervisors had
any objection to Bruce Brenner's speaking. l1r. Brenner is President of
Cycle Systems, Inc., which submitted the high bid for this service. Mr.
Brenner said he would limit his remarks to three to five minutes and that
he hoped to convince the Supervisors to award the contract to his company
instead of to the low bidder. He then outlined a plan for solid waste
recovery, the waste to be separated at its point of origin. He said his
facility is twice as large as Salem's incinerator and that much of the
Naterial now being buried could be routed to his plant. Chairman Burton
was concerned that the County's invitation to bid did not include this
proposed recycling process and did not feel that the other firm could
compete on this basis. Mr. Brenner said no other firm in the eastern
part of the country has his plant's capability. Chairman Burton asked the
County Attorney about the County's obligation to the low bidder since the
recycling feature was not included in the invitation to bid; the County
Attorney said everyone should bid on the same thing. Supervisor Myers
asked Mr. Brenner if part of the fee his company would be paid for the
recycled material would be returned to the County. Mr. Brenner said yes,
but he could not say how much. The County Administrator said recycling was
discussed with Mr. Paul Cox of Cycle Systems and with Bayes Wilson; the
Administrator felt that a recycling program must be developed in an orderly
manner and further studied. It was pointed out that the County's contract
with Uandy Dump, Inc. for this service expired June 30th and that Handy
Dump has continued the service on a month-to-month basis until a contract
could be awarded. Supervisor Myers moved for adoption of the following
prepared resolution in fairness to all conceriled:
I
I
-
~
~
8.-10-82
()8
RESOLUTION NO. 3199 ACCEI'TING A CERTAIN BID HADE TO THE
COUNTY OF ROANOKE TO FURNISH, DISTRIBUTE, AND SERVICE FIFTY-
FOUR BULK TRASH CONTAINERS FOR USE BY THE COUNTY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
I
Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain bid of Cavalier Equipment Corporation in the
amount of $46,600.00 to furnish, distribute, and service fifty-four bulk
trash containemfor a one year period, upon all and singular the invitation
to bid, the specifications of the County of Roanoke, the bidder's proposal,
and the provisions of this resolution, be, and the same hereby is accepted;
and
2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed
to enter into a contract with Cavalier Equipment Corporation upon a form
approved by the County Attorney for this service; and
3. That all other bids for this service are hereby rejected and
the County Clerk is directed to so notify such bidders and express the
I
County's appreciation for the submission of their bids.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Hyers, Johnson, and Burton.
NAYS:
Supervisors Hinter and Nickens.
Supervisor Johnson commented that she voted "Aye" because she felt
obligated to because of the way the bids were sent out.
The Purchasing Supervisor next presented the report on purchase
of steel-toed work boots and shoes. Supervisor Nickens asked why only I
local vendors were invited to bid. Hr. Fitzgerald replied that the low I
bidder sends a representative to the departments affected and the employees' I
I
shoes/boots are fitted. Supervisor Nickens said he favors supporting
I
local vendors, but that low price had also to be considered. Supervisor
Johnson moved for adoption of the following prepared resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 3200 ACCEPTING A CERTAIN BID HADE TO THE
COUNTY OF ROANOKE TO FURNISH STEEL-TOED WORK BOOTS TO BE USED
BY THE PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITY DEPARTHENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
I
~
I
I~
"...---
6 9 ·
8-10-82
1. That that certain bid of Stuart McGuire Company to furnish
approximately 140 pairs of steel-toed work boots and shoes to be used by
the Public Works and Utility Departments at a cost of $39.99 for boots
the invitation to bid~ the specifications of the County of Roanoke, the
I
and $35.99 for shoes~ upon all and singular the terms and conditions of
bidder's proposal, and the provisions of this resolution, be, and the
same hereby is accepted; and
2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed
to enter into a contract with Stuart McGuire Company upon a form approved
by the County Attorney for this purchase; and
3. That all other bids for this purchase are hereby rejected and
the County Clerk is directed to so notify such bidders and express the
County's appreciation for the submission of their bids.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
i
AYES:
Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Nickens, and Burton.
i
NAYS:
None
I
Mr. Fitzgerald next presented the recommendation of the Bid
Committee regarding the supplying of a heavy duty copy machine for use at
R.C.A.C.
:'
,
,I
Ms. Ann Heine, a Xerox Company representative~ was present and
entered into the discussion of a copier machine for the Roanoke County
Administrative Center. Ms. Heine asked if the State contract would include
a heavy-duty machine. She also pointed out that the State contract can
be cancelled at the end of any fiscal-year period but there is a penalty.
The County Attorney stated that a public service agency cannot be penalized.
Ms. Heine said her company did a survey to determine the County's photocopy
needs at the new location and she did not feel that the invitation to bid
addressed the actual needs. The Purchasing Supervisor was asked how he
I
determined what to include in the specifications. He replied that he
talked with department heads and met with the Director of Finance to arrive
at the specifications. Supervisor Myers asked Mr. Fitzgerald what the
down payment (IBM quote) represented. Mr. Fitzgerald replied that on a
lease/purchase price a down payment was necessary. Supervisor Nickens
~l
~
8-10-82
~
70
moved for rejection of all bids and moved that further consideration be
given to needs and costs involved. His motion was adopted by a unanimous
voice vote.
I
Regarding the report on purchase of fireworks for a display at
the Parks and Recreation Department's fall festival, the Purchasing
Supervisor was asked why a fireworks display was necessary. He replied
that it is to be the grand finale of the "Life -- Be In It" festival and
that funds have already been budgeted for the purpose. Supervisor Minter
moved for adoption of the following prepared resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 3201 ACCEPTING A CERTAIN PROPOSAL MADE TO
THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE TO FURNISH A COMPLETE FIREWORKS DISPLAY
AT THE COUNTY'S PARKS AND RECREATION FALL FESTIVAL
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain proposal of Southern International Fireworks,
I
Inc. to furnish a complete fireworks display on September 11, 1982 at
the Parks and Recreation Fall Festival for the amount of $2,500.00, be,
and hereby is accepted; and
2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed
to enter into a contract with Southern International Fireworks, Inc. for
this fireworks display upon a form approved by the County Attorney; and
3. That all other bids for this project are hereby rejected and
the County Clerk is directed to so notify such bidders and express the
County's appreciation for the submission of their bids.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, and Burton.
NAYS:
Supervisor Nickens
I
IN RE:
REPORT OF LIBRARY DIRECTOR
Mr. George D. Garretson, Director of the County Library System,
was present and asked if the Supervisors had any questions about his report
on Federal aid to the County libraries. There were none, and Supervisor
Johnson moved for adoption of the following prepared appropriation
resolution:
I---
,
I~
"...-
11 ~
8-10-82
Resolution Number 3202
On motion made by Supervisor Johnson, the General Appropriation
Resolution of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 22, 1982, be and is
the same hereby amended as follows to become effective August 10, 1982:
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NUMBER
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
I
Class:
Fund:
Dept:
Object:
Expenditures
General Operating
Library
Machinery & Equipment -
New
03-6-07300-70010
$3,233
Class:
Fund:
Source:
Revenue
General Operating
Library Grant
03-5-24040-90000
3,233
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Nickens, and Burton.
NAYS:
None
IN RE:
REPORTS OF COUNTY ENGINEER
I
County Engineer, R. E. Robertson, was present and advised that his
report entitled "Renewing Bond on Subdivisions" was for the Supervisors'
information and to notify them of a change in renewing procedure. Chairman
Burton asked what is the procedure when a bond is due to expire. Mr.
Robertson replied that most bonds are letters of credit and that his office
keeps a chart showing expiration dates. Before the expiration, arrangements
are made with the lending company to have the bond or letter of credit
extended by payment from the developer. The Supervisors thanked Mr. Robertso
for a good report.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens adopted by a unanimous voice
vote, the following prepared resolutions were adopted:
I
----'
~
~'lIrr."""'--"
I
I
8-10-82
72
AT A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA,
HELD ON August 10, 1982
PM]" t / (}I7 J / /Jtl r; J.
VI
ORDER
The Pu ic and the State Hi~ltway
Commis 'on of Virginia
. matter came on this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein. and upon the application
fur A alea Circle from its intersection with Tuli
to en .
epted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways.
d 50'
It appearing to the Board that drainage easements an II
have h
Pag
on
report
owners
right of way for said road
etofore been dedicuted by virtue of a certain map known as Spri nq (;rovp, Spr.r ion
which map was recorded in Plat Book 9
of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia,
31 1979 , and that by reason of the recordation of said map no
om a BOjird of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right of way from the abutting property
8 necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right of way and right for drainage.
W. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that said road known as Azalea Circle from
its i tersection with Tulip_1aneL-O.05 miles to end.
and wh h is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this order, be, and the same is hereby established
as a pu 'c road to become a part of tire Sfate Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County.
n motion by Supervisor Harry C. fJickens and
opted by tbe following recorded vote:
Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Nickens, and Burton.
~Jone.
A Copy - Teste:
Clerk
Boat~. of SopervJ'ors Of Roanoke County
M:-hPI/I\ cJk~jp~
-16-82: 5 opi es to
Co nty Engineer
I
--j-s ,
J'
"
8-10-82
AT A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA,
HELD ON August 10, 1982
J~/~P!J/~~fv.?
Board of Supervisors
ORDER
v.
The Public and the State Highway
Commission of Virginia
This matter came on this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the a
fur Tulip Lane from its intersection with
miles to .
to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways.
It ap~ring to the Board that drainage easements and ~ 5 0 ' right of way for
have heretofore bef;n dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Sprinq Grove....l
, which map was recorded in Plat Book _. 9
Page 133 I of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County,
on Ma y 31, 197 9 , and that by reason of the recordation of said
,'eport from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right of way from the abutting
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right of way and right for drain
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that said road known a
its intersection with Spring ~SL
Wi~h n7~lp~ Cir~]e
and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this order, be, and the same is hereby es
as a public road to become a part of the Slate Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke Coun
On motion by Supervisor Harry C. Nickens and
Adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYM: Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Nickens, and Burton.
I
18-16-82:
I
Nays: None.
A Copy - Teste:
Clerk
Boart) of Supervisors_ of Roanok
-i~.~d/ f J-LA~ ,~/}
5 copies to
County Engineer
I
4
I
t.ion
County
/
I
rrr'" ., ."1'" ~1f"".."r,n'7 '-.' ,.. ...
'- ~~,
,
8-10-82
74
T
;
I
AT A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA,
HELD O~..j Augus t 10, 1982
:f1I.~tJ/ /47 U fJ/9~!2
Board f Supervisors
VI
ORDER
The P lie and the State Highway
Comm! sion of Vir~inia
'I'11iJ matter came 00 this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application
pring Grove Drive from its intersection with Route 24 0.31 mile
for
to i
intersection with Tuli Lane.
1
to be epted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways.
It appearing to the Board that drainage easements and II 60' right of way for said road
have ~ retofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Sprinq Grove, Sec;tio 4
, which map was recorded in Plat Book 9
Pag of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia,
on a 31 1979 , and that by reason of the recordation of said map no
reportt rvn a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right of way from the abL tting property
owner is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right of way and right for drainage.
OW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that said road known as Spr ing Gr~ve Dr i ve ,
with Route 2~:3l miles to its intersection
wit
and w ich is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this order, be, and the same is hereby established
as a p lie road to become a part of the Slate Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County.
n motion by Supervisor Harry C. Nickens and
: dopted by the following recorded vote:
i
I Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Nickens, and Burton.
r~one.
A Copy - Teste:
Clerk
Boay<I) of Supervisors of Roanoke County
/JA~~It/ J? ~~
116-82:
5 copies to
C unty Engineer
I
I
!
I
lob ,",,' -4
I ~)
8-10-82
ROANOKE COUNTY SUBDIVISION STREET
DATE OF RESOLUTION:
DATE OF ACCEPTANCE:
;1 I
,
\?-Y
Proposed additions shown in red
DESCRIPTIONS:
(1)
(2)
(3)
Spring Grove Drive from its intersection
Route 24 to its intersection with Tulip L
Tulip Lane from its intersection with Spr'
Grove Drive to its intersection with Azal
Azalea Circle from its intersection with
Lane to end.
'th
e
g
Cr.
lip
LENGTH: (1) 0.31 miles
(2) 0.13 miles
(3) 0.05 miles
R/W: (1) 60 feet
(2) 50 feet
( 3) 50 feet
ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 44 feet
(2) 36 feet
( 3) 30 feet
SURFACE WIDTH: (1) 40 f::~ e t
(2) 32 feet
( 3 ) 26 feet
SERVICE: (1) 4 homes
(2) 4 homes
(3) 3 homes
Improvements to be made: None
I
Resident Engineer's recommendation:
I
r~;~'flI$'}C;:;'
r-,
8-10-82
76
On motion of Supervisor Johnson adopted by a unanimous voice vote,
the following prepared resolution was adopted:
I
AT A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA,
HELD ON
August la, 1982
Board
VB
ORDER
He and the State Highway
ion of Virginia
for P
This matter came on this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application
Drive from its intersection with Eaqle Circle, 0.10 miles,
("" a.wgDnc:::p rirf'lp
epted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways.
50'
It appearing to the Board that drainage easements and 8-
right of way for said road
I
have h retofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as
Penn Forest,
Sec ion 15 , which map was recorded in Plat Book 9
Pag 39 of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia,
u 1 3, 1979 , and that by reason of the recordation of said map no
rom a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right of way from the abutting property
is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right of way and right for drainage.
I
OW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that said road known as-I:ellguin Drive from its
with Eagle_.fi.!".cle,.-.9.10 miles to its intersection.. with
Ie.
and w h is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this order, be. and the same is hereby established
lic road to become a part of the "Tate Secondary System of Highways in Roanfike County.
motion of Supervisur May W. Johnson and
opted by the following recorded vote;
Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Nickens, and Burton.
116-82:
ays: None.
I
5 . opies to
Co nty Engineer
oanoke,:7Y
.~1/
~
'''.. ~ t
-! ,.-
8-10-82
ROANOKE COUNTY SUBDIVISION STREET
DATE OF RESOLUTIon:
DATE OF ACCEPTANCE:
I
<-
t.
---\
~~ ij)
.~-...;
I.
Proposed addition shown ln red
DESCRIPTION: Penguin Drive from its intersection with Eagle ircle
to its intersection with Snowgoose Circle.
LENGTH: 0.10 miles
R/W: 50 feet
ROAm-vAY h'IDTH: 36 feet
SURFJI.CE \-vIDTH: 32 feet
SERVICE: 3 bomes
Improvement to be made: None
I
Resident Engineer's Recommendations:
I
""'i- ~,"",J.,l' '''"l''f'!"' -.,,-".'--------.-----.----'---.~"-~-
~~r~"''r>r'~ ". r -.r"~ ,. , . -', ~
'---<I~
I
8-10-82
.78
On motion of Supervisor Myers adopted by a unanimous voice vote,
the following prepared resolutions were adopted:
I
AT A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA,
HELD ON August 10, 1932
IJ~J/'/ I /2!l/ I / :4-/91217
~
I
!
Board of S~ pervisors
J
.
4
\
va
(
ORDER
The Publi and the State Highway
Commissi< l of Virginia ,
I
., Pis matter came on this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application
for No thland Drive from its intersection withYillow Crp-p-k Drivp-.
0.08 m les to its intersection with Brubaker Drive
~
to be accfpted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways.
II appearing to the Board that drainage easements and :l 501 right of way for said road
,
I
have her .ofore be~n dedicated by \irtue of a certain map known..as 1;',1; 11 ow r.ree.k..
Sectio 5 , which map was recorder. in Plat Book 9 ,
Page 2 1 of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia,
on A g. 20 , 1981 , and that by reason of the recordation of said map no
.eport fr m a Board of Viewers, nor consent or conation of right of way from the abutting property
owners i necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right of way and right for drainage.
N( W, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that said road known as Northland Drive from
its ln ersection wi th ~villow Cre~---DKiYa. 0.08 milp-s L 0 its interses::tion
with B ubaker Drive.
,
and whic is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this order, be, and the same is hereby established
as a publ road to become a part of the $fate Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County.
On motion of Supervisor Robert E. Myers and
A( pted by the following recorded vote:
A, s: Supervi sors Myers, ~~i nter, Johnson, Ni ckens, and Burton.
I
l -82:
Nivs: None.
j
5 ct pies to
Coutty Engineer
I
I
1
j
I
I
A Copy - Teste:
Clerk
Uoarnf SUI/if of Roano~e CO'/tr
JJ/rr&l~~ J&~~
i--
~
8-10-82
,
,....,0.
t ;]
AT A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERV ISORS
OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA,
HELD ON August 10, 19B2
J'/l/W /'1.'/1/,/ /l.-~f3(4
I
va
~
)
ORDER
Board of Supervisors
The Public and the State Highway
Commission of Virginia
. nus matter came on this day to be heard upon the proceed~gs herein, and upon the
fur Willow Creek Drive from its inter~er .
0.06 miles to its intersection with Northland Drive.
to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways.
50'
i
I
I
I
I
i
!
I
i
j
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
,
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
!-16-82:
I
I
,
I
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERF.D that said road known as Willow Creek Drive
o.
tion
from its intersection with Reedl~nd Road
with Northland Drive.
and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this order, be, and the same is hereby
as a public road to become a part of the $fate Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke Cou ty.
On motion of Supervisor Robert E. Myers and
Adopted by the following recorded vote:
stablished
Ayes: Supervisors ~1yers, Minter, Johnson, Nickens, and Burton.
Nays: tJone.
A Copy - Teste:
Clerk
B. oJL.tr f.. Sll~p'r isors ...Of R?a. no
4 E-1 /J
. _ ~ 'lfLt<. r. )A;/lA.(
v
I
5 copies to
County Engineer
e County
.'-1/~_
8-10-82
~ ;
o
I
AT A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA,
HELD ,)N August la, 1982
:i1ill:i1 /11 /,/ Nrj 'AId
Board of upcrvisors
VB
ORDER
The Pub c and the State Highway
Commis n of Virginia
. with
. matter came on this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application
aker Drive from its intersection with Reedland Road, 0.05
I
o its intersection with Northland Drive
epted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways.
t appearing to the Board that drainage easements and:l 50' right of way for said road
tofole been dedic2ted by virtue of a certain map known as \"1illow Creek
s & 5 , which map was recorded in Plat Book 9
& 0 he records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia,
15 1981 & Au . 2 1 e :land that by reason of the recordation of said map no
1m a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation 0" right of way from the abutting property
necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said r;ght of way and right for drainage.
its
W, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that said road known as Brubaker Drive from
en;ection with Reedland Road, 0.05 miles to its intersection
rthland Drive.
and whi h is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this order, be, and the sal e is hereby established
as a pu ic road to become a part of the State Secondary System of I-lighways in RO<1noke County.
o motion by Supervisor Robert E. Myers and
A opted by the following recorded vote:
A es: Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Nickens, and Burton.
I 82:
ys: None.
A Copy - Teste:
Cler~
Hoar f Super
~... OuA~t
5 c pies to
Cau ty Engineer
L"~ 1 '
8-10-82
ROANOKE COUNTY SUBDIVISION STREETS
DATE OF RESOLUTION:
DATE OF ACCEPTANCE:
'"
1"
o
I:.~-\
"'-\
.;1;n, ~ -,/' "'\
€l~' ---.1. *
II--=-- .
if I
;~ I
. I - I
~ L-_J
l ~
,11.::,1-/)
\ i .--'"
I
? A.
~ ~
Q'~
~;
@
"\,
Proposed additions shown in red
DESCRIPTION:
( I )
( 2 )
(3 )
Brubaker Drive from its intersection with Reed and Road
to its intersectlon with Northland Drive
Northland Drive from its intersection with vJil ow Cree"
Drive to its in tersection VJi t:1 Brubaker Drive I
Willow Creek Drive from its intersection with {eedlan~
Road to its intersection with Nortnland Drive.
LENGTH:
(1) 0.05 miles
(2) 0.08 miles
(3) 0.06 miles
R/W: All 50 feet
ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 30 feet
(2) 30 feet
(3) 36 feet
SURFACE l\TIDTH: (l) 26 feet
(2) 26 feet
(3) 32 feet
SERVICE: (1) 7 homes
(2) 13 homes
(3) 5 homes
Improvements to be made: None
Resident Engineer's recommendations:
I
!
~
~.
~
8-10-82
" a 2
After the County Engineer presented his report entitled
"Owner Haintenance AgreeTTJ.ents - Storm Water Detention Ponds", Supervisor
Johnson moved for adoption of the following prepared resolution:
I
RESOLUTION NO. 3203 AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ON
BEFALF OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO ENTER INTO A CERTAIN AGREEMENT
RELATING TO A STORM WATER DETENTION POND
BE IT RESOLVED by t~e Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follmvs:
1. That the County Administrator be, and he hereby is, authorized
to execute on behalf of Roanoke County a certain storm water detention
pond agreement with H & B Colonial Corporation relating to a certain
parcel at the intersection of State Secondary Route 419 and Colonial
Avenue, S.W., known as the "Blanton property" as shown on certain plans
dated December 1, 1980, prepared by Buford T. Lumsden and Associates,
P.C. for H & B Colonial Corporation and further in strict compliance
with all and singular the terms and conditions of a certain agreement
I
bearing date of September 3, 1981, a copy of which is on file in the
office of the Clerk to the Board; and
2. That the execution of such agreement by the County Administrator
shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Nickens, and Burton.
NAYS:
None.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson adopted by a unanimous voice
,
I
vote, the following prepared resolution was adopted:
I
Ii
I
i
i
I
!
!
i-
~
,. ~) "I
"', ~..>
8-10-82
AT A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA,
HELD ON August 10, 1982
I
AY~lY/!77k/!V?~~
v.
I
)
ORDER
Board of Supervisors
The Public and the State Highway
Commissicn of Virginia
Tbia matter came on this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the ap lication
for C3.nter Drive from its intersection
Rou e 689)
to its intersection with Squir~~ Court
to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways.
It appearing to the Board that drainage easements and ll. 7 0 ~ right of way for s
have heretofore been dedicated by vir:ue of a certain map known as
Section 1 __ which map was recorded in Plat Book 9
Page 183 I of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County,
on J an. 28, 1981 , and that by reMon of the recordation of said
report from a Boar i. of Viewers, nor consent or donation of rignt of way fron the abutting
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right of way and right for drain
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that said road known as
I
m
its intersection with Ros.elawn Road. 11 lfl
.
Vii th Sq'1irQ~ Court_
and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this order, be, and the same is hereby es
as a public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke Coun
On motion of Supervisor May W. Johnson and
Adopted by the following recorded vote:
Ay~s: Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Nickens, and Burton.
blished
Nays: None.
I
16-82: 5 copies to
County Engineer
Cou,
,e/_
-I
I
I
I
!
....i
l!1II"""~'"" ~,~P"."." ,
8-10-82
f. :8 :4
ROANOKE COUNTY SUBVIDISION STREET
I
DATE OF RESOLUTION:
DATE OF ACCEPTANCE:
~
Proposed addition shown in red
DSCRI TION: Canter Drive from its intersection with Roselawn Road
(Route 689) to its intersection with Squires Court.
I LENGT 0.16 miles
R/W: feet
ROADW WIDTH: 62 feet
SURFA WIDTH: 36 feet
SERVI 3 homes
Impro ments to be made: None
I
I
Residnt Engineer's recommendations:
I
.~
"..-
8-10-82
85
.
IN RE:
REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF UTILITY ENGINEERING AND ADMINISTRATION
John R. Hubbard was present and reminded the Supervisors that
at their July 27th meeting he had been directed to report on a request
over the private water system serving their area. Mr. Hubbard advised that
I
received from residents of the Bridlewood subdivision that the County take
although the County has no jurisdiction over privately owned water systems,
the Bridlewood system is being sold to Water Distributors, Inc. and he
recommended that the Supervisors approve this transfer since this approval
is required by the State Corporation Commission.
!
1
I
I
I
i
I
!
Supervisor Johnson then moved for adoption of the following
prepared resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 3204 CONCURRING IN THE OPERATION OF A
CERTAIN WATER SYSTEM BY A CERTAIN PRIVATE WATER COMPANY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
"
1. That that certain request of Water Distributors, Inc. to
I
purchase and operate that certain water system known as the Bridlewood
I,
Water System in Roanoke County, the same to be operated in accordance
with and pursuant to all and singular the rules and regulations of the
:
!
;
I'
State Health Department and under the jurisdiction of the State Corp-
oration Commission of the Commonwealth of Virginia is hereby concurred
I'
in and agreed to by the Board; and
2. That an attested copy of this resolution be forthwith forwarded
to the State Health Department, State Corporation Commission, and Water
Distributors, Inc.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Nickens, and Burton.
NAYS:
None.
IN RE:
SCHOOL BOARD'S REQUEST FOR TRANSFER OF FUNDS
I
The Supervisors directed that this request be held over to their
August 24th, 1982, meeting.
-'
.....
..~
8-10-82
86
IN RE:
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
On motion of Supervisor Myers adopted by a unanimous voice vote,
the following prepared resolution was adopted:
I
RESOLUTION NO. 3205 CONGRATULATING ELIZABETH W. STOKES ON
HER ELECTION AS PRESIDENT OF THE NATIONAL CLERK'S ASSOCIATION
WHEREAS, Elizabeth W. Stokes has served the County of Roanoke and
its courts for a number of years as the Clerk to the Circuit Court of
RoanokE, County, her term of office having originally conunenced on
January 1, 1968, from which time she has continuously served in such
capacity; and
WHEREAS, Elizabeth W. Stokes did, in order to promote the functions
of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, become a
member of the National Clerk's Association in 1970, during which period
of time since her association with such Association she has gained
successfully more responsible offices; and
WHEREAS, on July 11, 1982, she was elected President of the National
I
Clerk's Association and on July 13, 1982, and at a special ceremony in
Baltimore, Maryland, Mrs. Stokes was installed in the office of President
of the National Clerk's Association by Mrs. May Winn Johnson, member and
former chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County does extend to Mrs. Elizabeth W. Stokes, Clerk of the
Circuit Court of Roanoke County, its most sincere and geniune congrat-
ulations upon her election and installation as President of the National
Clerk's Association, and the Board does further express its deepest wish
for Mrs. Stokes' continued success as both the Clerk of the Circuit
Court of Roanoke County and as President of the National Clerk's Association.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a duly authenticated copy of this
I
resolution appropriately displayed be forthwith forwarded to Elizabeth
W. Stokes.
Adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Nickens, and Burton.
NAYS:
None.
I
'---
I
I ~I
~
87
.
8-10-82
On motion of Supervisor Myers adopted by a unanimous voice vote,
the following prepared resolution was adopted, copy of which is to be
forwarded to Edward C. Park, Jr:
RESOLUTION NO. 3206 EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND THE CITIZENS OF
ROANOKE COUNTY TO EDWARD C. PARK, JR. FOR HIS SERVICE AS A
MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
I
WHEREAS, Edward C. Park, Jr. was elected to the Board of Supervisors
to serve a four-year term from the Vinton Magisterial District commencing
January 1, 1978, during which term Mr. Park served on the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County tirelessly and with selfless dedication to
promote the interest and welfare of Roanoke County and all its citizens;
and
\~EREAS, Edward C. Park, Jr., in addition to serving on the Board
of Supervisors, served as both a member and chairman of the Roanoke
County Public Service Authority in which capacity Mr. Park demonstrated
both an ability and an understanding of coping with the vast water and
sewer related problems confronting the Roanoke Valley; and
I
lnIEREAS, Edward C. Park, Jr. was reelected tc the Board of Supervisors
for a second four-year term commencing January 1, 1982, and was duly
elected Chairman of the Board at its organizational meeting in January
of 1982, from which position and membership on the Board of Supervisors
Mr. Park resigneQ on July 16, 1982 becnuse of moving from Roanoke County
to the State of Texas.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County does hereby express its most heartfelt and deepest
appreciation for the many hours of tireless and selfless work exhibited
by Edward C. Park, Jr. on behalf of Roanoke County, the citizens of the
Vinton ~1agisterial District of Roanoke County, and all the citizens of
and as its Chairman, and does further wish for Mr. Park's continued
I
Roanoke County during his tenure as a member of the Board of Supervisors
future success.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a duly authenticated copy of this
resolution appropriately displayed be forthwith forwarded to Edward C.
Park, Jr.
I
I
I
,
,
~l
I
I !
!
i
!
!
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
i
,
!
i
I
I
\
i
i
l
I !
!
i
;
I
,
,
~
~
8-10-82
88
""
Adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Nickens, and Burton.
NAYS:
None.
On motion of Supervisor Myers adopted by a unanimous voice vote,
the following prepared resolution was adopted, copy of which is to be
I forwarded to William T. Whitwell:
RESOLUTION NO. 3207 EXPRESSING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS'
APPRECIATION TO WILLIAM T. WHITWELL FOR HIS SERVICE AS A
MEMBER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF ROANOKE COUNTY
WHEREAS, William T. Whitwell was first appointed to the Planning
Commission of Roanoke County from the Hollins Magisterial District in
February of 1980; and
WHEREAS, during William T. Whitwell's tenure as a member of the
Roanoke County Planning Commission, he served as chairman from January
1, 1982 until his resignation in May of 1982; and
WHEREAS, during his service as both a member and chairman of the
Planning Commission, Mr. Whitwell exhibited expertise and dedication to
the performance of the functions of the Planning Commission in dealing
with the matters before the Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County does hereby express its deepest and most sincere appre-
ciation to William T. Whitwell for his dedicated service to the citizens
of Roanoke County during his tenure as a member of the Roanoke County
Planning Commission and the Board does further express its deepest
regard for the continued success of William T. Whitwell in his future
endeavors.
Adopted by the following recorded vote:
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
i
,
!
I
t-
I
d
li~
AYES:
Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Nickens, and Burton.
NAYS:
None
On motion of Supervisor Myers adopted by a unanimous voice vote,
the following prepared. resolution was adopted, copy of which is to be
forwarded to Robert E. Stegall:
r
8-10-82
d 9 .
RESOLUTION NO. 3208 EXPRESSING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS'
APPRECIATION TO ROBERT E. STEGALL FOR HIS SERVICE AS A MEMBER
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF ROANOKE COUNTY
vlliEREAS, Robert E. Stegall was first appointed to the Planning
in January of 1976; and
I
Commission of Roanoke County from the Cave Spring Magisterial District
WHEREAS, Robert E. Stegall was reappointed as a member of the
Planning Commission in January of 1980; and
WlIEREAS, during Robert E. Stegall's tenure as a member of the
Roanoke County Planning Commission, Mr. Stegall served as chairman
during 1979-80; and
WlIEREAS, during his service as both a member and chairman of the
Planning Commission, Mr. Stegall exhibited expertise and dedication to
the performance of the functions of the Planning Commission in dealing
with the matters before the Commission; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Stegall resigned from the Roanoke County Planning
Commission on August 1, 1982.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of
I
Roanoke County does hereby express its deepest and most sincere appre-
ciation to Robert E. Stegall for his dedicated service to the citizens
of Roanoke County during his tenure as a member of the Roanoke County
Planning Commission and the Board does further express its deepest
regard for the continued success of Robert E. Stegall in his future
endeavors.
Adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Nickens, and Burton.
NAYS:
None.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson the following prepared resolution
I
was adopted:
RESOLUTION NO. 3209 PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN MATTERS RELATING
TO THE STRUCTURE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
PENDING THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IN
JANUARY 1983
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
-
1. That from and after July 16, 1982, Athena E. Burton, Supervisor
.....
""lIl
8-10-82
9'0
from the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, duly elected Vice Chairman
of the Board of Supervisors at its annual meeting held January, 1982,
shall perform and otherwise carry out all and singular the duties of
I
Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County as made and
provided by law pending reorganization of the Board of Supervisors at
its annual meeting in January, 1983; and
2. That Athena E. Burton shall during such period as hereinabove
mentioned be entitled to and shall receive all and singular the emoluments
and benefits of the office of Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County as made and provided by law; and
3. In the absense of Athena E. Burton from any meeting of the
Board of Supervisors pending such reorganization as aforesaid, the Board
of Supervisors shall elect one of its members in attendance temporary
chairman of the Board and in furtherance of such election, the County
Administrator shall at such meeting call same to order for the sole
I
purpose of receiving nominations for a Board member to serve as temporary
chairman and to tally the vote cast for temporary chairman at such
meeting.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, and Nickens
NAYS: None.
ABSTAINED: Supervisor Burton.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens the following prepared resolution
was adopted:
RESOLUTION NO. 3210 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 3175 APPROVING
THE PAY PLAN FOR THE 1982-83 FISCAL YEAR
I
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That Paragraph No. 1 of Resolution No. 3175 adopted June 29,
1982, be, and hereby is, amended in the section titled "Unclassified
Employees" in the following respects, to-wit:
Code
Title
Number
Salary
907
958
Sheriff
Chief Deputy Sheriff
1
1
$37,856
$25,895
~
,...---
9 1 , 8-10-82
2. That Paragraph No. 2 of Resolution No. 3175 be, and hereby is,
amended in the following respects, to-wit:
Policy Statement
Law Enforcement Pay Scale
I
Ranking officers (sergeants, lieutenants, captains) will maintain
their correct position on the pay scale according to their date of
qualification but will be paid a supplement as follows:
Sergeant
Lieutenant
Captain
- $2,000 above scale
- $4,000 above scale
- $6,000 above scale
3. That the amendments hereinabove set forth to Resolution No.
3175 be, and they hereby are, effective from and after July 1, 1982.
4. That each employee identified in Resolution No. 3175 shall be
placed in either the unclassified service of the County or the classi-
fied service of the County at the pay rate set forth therein; provided
however, any employee otherwise paid by Roanoke County pursuant to the
pay and classification plan set forth in Resolution No. 3175 whose
salary is established by the State Compensation Board as made and
I
provided by law at a dollar amount of compensation greater than that set
forth in Resolution No. 3175 shall receive the dollar amount established
by the State Compensation Board, provided the excess funds over and
above the compensation set forth in the County pay and classification
plan is fully funded by the State Compensation Board through the Common-
wealth of Virginia and the County of Roanoke shall incur no liability
for the payment of any funds over and above the pay scale specifically
set forth in Resolution No. 3175 and any subsequent amendments thereto.
On motion of Supervisor Harry C. Nickens and adopted by the following
roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Nickens, and Burton.
NAYS:
None.
I
On motion of Supervisor Nickens the following prepared
appropriation resolution was adopted:
Resolution Number 3211
On motion made by Supervisor Nickens, the General appropriation
Resolution of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 22, 1982 be, and is
~
~
8-10-82
,
92
the same hereby amended as follows to become effective August 10, 1982:
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NUMBER
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
Class: Expenditures
I Fund: General Operating
Dept: Policing & Investigating 03-6-03102-10010 $13,500
Confinement of Prisoners 03-6-03301-10010 3,000
Youth & Family Services 03-6-03105-10010 500
Dept: Unappropriated Balance 03-6-99999-99999 ($17,000)
Adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Nickens and Burton.
NAYS:
None.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson the following prepared
resolution was adopted:
RESOLUTION NO. 3212 ESTABLISHING A MEETING SCHEDULE FOR THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY AND PROVIDING FOR A
TIME AND PLACE FOR SUCH MEETINGS TO BE CONVENED AND HELD
I
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That there shall be a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County on the first, second, and fourth Tuesdays of each
calendar month; and
2. That such meetings shall be convened at 6 p.m. of each meeting
date; provided however, that items on the Board's agenda of general and
specific public interest shall not be heard prior to 7 p.m. of such
meeting dates; and
~
3. That such meetings as herein provided shall commence from and
after the first day of September, 1982, to be held at the Roanoke County
Civic Center; provided that from and after November 1, 1982, such meetings
I
shall be held at the Roanoke County Administration Center on Brambleton
Avenue in Roanoke County; and
4. That the provisions of this resolution shall be in full force
and effect from and after September 1, 1982; provided, that this resolu-
tion shall first be posted on the door of the Roanoke County Courthouse
and published in a newspaper having general circulation in Roanoke
County once a week for two successive weeks prior to the effective date
hereof.
I
,:
I~
r'""
~ 3 ,
8-10-82
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Johnson, Nickens, and Burton.
NAYS:
Supervisor Myers.
I
On motion of Supervisor Johnson the following prepared
resolution was adopted:
RESOLUTION NO. 3213 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 3001 WHICH
RESOLUTION ACCEPTED A CERTAIN OFFER TO DONATE CERTAIN LAND TO
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain offer to donate a certain tract of land
situate, lying, and being in the Windsor Hills l1agisterial District of
Roanoke County and containing approximately forty-nine (49) acres upon
the express condition that the County of Roanoke obtain an accurate
survey of said property in order to ascertain the exact acreage contained
I
therein, and ~ reasonable attorney's fees not ~ exceed Five Hundred
Seventy-five Dollars _($575.00) ~ effectuate such transfer, is hereby
accepted upon such express conditions; and
2. That the County Administrator is hereby directed to accept such
conveyance on behalf of the Board of Supervisors upon a form approved by
the County Attorney all as made and provided by law.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Nickens, and Burton.
NAYS:
None.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson the following prepared appropriatio
Rsolution Number 3214
I
resolution was adopted:
On motion made by Supervisor Johnson, the General Appropriation
Resolution of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 22, 1982 be, and is
the same hereby amended as follows to become effective August 10, 1982:
1-'
~
8-10-82
94
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NUMBER
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
I
Class:
Fund:
Dept:
Object:
Expenditures
General Operating
County Attorney
Professional Services
03-6-01204-30020
$ 575
Dept:
Unappropriated Balance
03-6-99999-99999
(575)
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Nickens, and Burton.
NAYS:
None.
On motion of Supervisor Myers the following prepared resolution
was adopted:
RESOLUTION NO. 3215 APPOINTING CLAUDE LEE THE ROANOKE
COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
I
1. That Claude Lee be, and hereby is, appointed the Roanoke
County Zoning Administrator; and
2. That an attested copy of this resolution be forthwith forwarded
to Claude Lee and to the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Myers, Minter, Johnson, Nickens, and Burton.
NAYS:
None.
IN RE:
APPOINTMENTS
(1) The matter of filling the vacancy of Edwin N. LeGard, Jr.
on the Air Pollution Advisory and Appeals Board was
continued.
I
(2) The matter of filling the vacancy of Mrs. Helen Rutrough
on the Air Pollution Advisory and Appeals Board was
continued.
(3) Chairman Burton asked for a motion reappointing Mrs. Frank
D. Porter, III to the Air Pollution Advisory and Appeals
Board for a four-year term. Supervisor Minter so moved
and the motion was adopted by a unanimous voice vote.
(4) Chairman Burton asked for a volunteer from the Board to
replace Edward C. Park, Jr. on the Cablevision Committee.
Supervisor Minter volunteered, and Supervisor Johnson
nominated Supervisor Minter. Adopted by a unanimous voice
vote.
!
;
I
I
i
I-
I
~
,.....-
9~ ~
8-10-82
(5)
Supervisor
to replace
Services.
Myers moved that Supervisor Nickens be appointed
Edward C. Park, Jr. as Director of Emergency
Adopted by a unanimous voice vote.
(6) The matter of re-appointing or replacing Bev D. Mitchell on
the County Grievance Panel was continued.
(7) Supervisor Nickens moved that Charles L. Jennings be re-
appointed as an alternate member of the County Grievance
Panel for a two-year term. Adopted by a unanimous voice
vote.
I
(8) The matter of re-appointing or replacing Albert Trompeter on
the Industrial Development Authority was continued.
(9) Supervisor Minter moved that Gene D. Hhitlow be re-appointed
as a member of the Industrial Development Authority for a
four-year term. Adopted by a unanimous voice vote.
(10) The matter of re-appointing or replacing Howard R. Keister,
Jr. as the County's citizen representative on the Roanoke
Valley Solid Waste Management Board was continued.
(11) The matter of filling the vacancy of William B. Miller on
the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family
Services Advisory Board was continued.
(12) Chairman Burton asked for a volunteer from the Board to
act as liaison between the Board of Supervisors and the
Library Board. Supervisor Minter volunteered and Supervisor
Nickens moved that he be appointed. The motion was adopted
by a unanimous voice vote.
I
IN RE:
REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
Supervisors Johnson, Minter, and Myers had nothing to bring
before the Board at this time.
Supervisor Nickens requested that at the most convenient time,
the Supervisors consider a meeting at the new Vinton Municipal Building.
The County Administrator was directed to schedule such a meeting.
Chairman Burton asked the County Administrator if he had found
out from the Chairman of the Industrial Fact-Finding Commission what the
intent of the Commission was as a result of the City of Roanoke unilaterally
creating an industrial commission for the City only. The Administrator
replied that he had not been able to get in touch with Mr. Jones. Chairman
I
Burton then publicly stated her concern about the future of the Commission;
she felt its effectiveness had been impaired by Roanoke City's action
creating its own, separate economic development commission. Chairman
Burton further state she thought the Commission was to prepare a Valley-
wide survey. Supervisor Johnson asked if the City of Salem ever joined
-
....
I
I
:
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
,
I
I
I
I I
1
t
I
I
l
I
I
I
,
i
I
I
,
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
~
8-10-82
9(6i
the Commission. She was told that Salem plans to appoint three members
to study the Commission.
Chairman Burton then asked the other Supervisors' concurrence
in having copies of approved minutes of these meetings placed in County
libraries for public view. Supervisor Johnson asked if they could be
displayed in a prominent place. Supervisor Nickesn asked if the readership
could be monitored.
Chairman Burton also asked for concurrence from the other
Supervisors in placing agenda material in all libraries, along with the
agendas. It was agreed and directed that an informational display be
placed at all five libraries.
IN RE:
EXECUTIVE SESSION
At 11:13 p.m., S~pervisor Minter moved that the Board go into
executive session to consider a legal matter and personnel and real estate
matters pursuant to Section 2.1-344 (a) (1), (2), and (6) of the Code of
Virginia. His motion was adopted by a unanimous voice vote.
IN RE: RETURN TO OPEN SESSION
There was a motion by Supervisor Johnson at 11:27 p.m. to return
to open session. Chairman Burton called on County Planner Timothy W.
Gubala to report on progress of Community Block Grant applications. Mr.
Gubala recommended that industrial development and water/sewer applications
be pursued rather than a low priority solid waste program. Supervisor
Johnson moved that Mr. Gubala proceed with contacting other municipalities
and ascertain if they are interested in a joint effort as well as develop
an individual effort. Motion was carried by a unanimous voice vote.
IN RE:
EXECUTIVE SESSION
There was a motion by Supervisor Minter to go into executive
session at 11:35 p.m. pursuant to Section 2.1-344 (a) (1), (2), and (6)
of the Code of Virginia to consider legal, personnel and real estate
matters. 11otion was carried by a unanimous voice vote.
ll~
III""'"
q7 ~
3-10-82
IN RE:
RETURN TO OPEN SESSION
There was a motion by Supervisor Myers to go into open session
at 12:13 a.m. Motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
IN RE:
ADJOURNMENT
Supervisor Hyers moved to adjourn at 12:13 a.m. Motion was
carried.
~Z~
CHAIRMAN
....
I
I
II
I