Loading...
11/9/1983 - Regular ~ 11-9-83 1 5...:~ r~ --.. ..-:; ~~7 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S. W. Roanoke, VA 24015 November 11, 1983 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day in open session at the Roanoke County Administration Center, Roanoke, Virginia, this being the second Tuesday, and the first regular meeting of the month of November, 1983. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER - SPECIAL CALL MEETING Chairman, May W. Johnson, called the special call meeting to order at 1 :14 p.m. The roll call was taken: MEM BERS PRESENT: Chairman, May W. Johnson; Vice Chairman, Harry C. Nickens; Supervisor, Athena E. Burton MEMBERS ABSENT: Supervisors Gary J. Minter, Robert E. Myers IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION Supervisor Nickens moved to go into Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia, Section 2.1-344 (a) (6) to discuss a legal matter. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. Supervisor Minter arrived at 1:27 p.m. during the Executive Session. IN RE: OPEN SESSION Supervisor Minter moved to return to open session at 2:50 p.m. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. Supervisor Burton moved to adjourn the Special Call Meeting at 2:51 p.m., and the motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER At 3:00 p.m. Chairman, May W. Johnson called the regular meeting to order. The roll call was taken: MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman, May W. Johnson; Vice Chairman, Harry C. Nickens; Supervisors Athena E. Burton, Gary J. Minter MEMBERS ABSENT: Supervisor Robert E. Myers /" 19 t7 'I 11-9-83 Work Session - Sewer and Water Rates Mr. E. J. Gentsch, 5060 Falcon Ridge Road, Roanoke, Virginia, presented a new proposal outlining his thoughts and recommendations for a fair and equitable billing system for all citizens of Roanoke County. The staff presented its recommendations for water and sewer rate revisions to be effective January 1, 1984. As a result of this discussion, the Board of Supervisors made the following motions: Supervisor Minter moved that the staff prepare model rate structures using Mr. Gentsch's proposal which consists of 21 factors to facilitate a smoother curve with smaller increments. This report is to include financial advantages and disadvantages. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. Supervisor Minter moved for staff to provide written answers for Mr. Gentsch's concerns and include alternatives. The motion carried by the following voice vote: AYES: Supervsiors Minter, Burton, Johnson NAYS: Supervisor Nickens ABSENT: Supervisor Myers Supervisor Minter moved for the staff to prepare a report on the possible alternatives for rate adjustments for 1983. This report is to be prepared in cooperation with Mr. Gentsch and to include the available options and legal implications. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. Supervisor Minter moved that a water and sewer rate public hearing be scheduled for December 13, 1983, advertising "rates not to exceed " This amount is to be determined by the Superintendents of the Departments of Fiscal Management and Public Facilities and the County Administrator. This amount is also to be determined after the Superintendents have an opportunity to review Mr. Gentsch's most recent proposal. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. Work Session - Grants Policy Superintendent of the Department of Development, Timothy Gubala, explained that there is no existing policy for evaluating, reviewing, and submitting grants. After discussing some language and procedure revisions, Mr. Gubala advised that the revised Policy would come back to the Board as a part of the Consent Agenda. ~ 11-9-83 1Q "~;.",, '.'-/ IN RE: RECESS At 5:35 p.m. Chairman Johnson called for a dinner recess. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Johnson called the regular meeting to order at 7:06 p.m. The roll call was taken: MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman, May W. Johnson; Vice Chairman, Harry C. Nickens; Supervisors Athena E. Burton, Gary J. Minter MEM BERS ABSENT: Supervsior Robert E. Myers IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES Vice Chairman, Harry C. Nickens, offered the invocation. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA Chairman Johnson indicated that Superintendent of the Department of Fiscal Management, John Chambliss, requested that Items #8, #9, and #10 be deleted because the Bid Committee did not have an opportunity to meet, and that Item #15 also be deleted. Supervisor Burton raised a question on Item #16, wanting verification of the Virginia Poly technical Institute student's qualifications who will be conducting the study for the future use of the existing Roanoke County Courthouse. Supervisor Minter moved the following Consent Agenda Resolution deleting Item #8, #9, #10 and #15: RESOLUTION NO. 83-200 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVffiORS AGENDA FOR THffi DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM B - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for November 9, 1983, designated as Item B - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated as Items 1 through 20, deleting Items 8, 9, 10, and 15 as follows: 1. Letter dated October 5, 1983, from F & W Community Development Corporation regarding Glade Creek sewer project - Memorandum of Agreement - Resolution 19 11-9-83 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Memorandum dated October 20, 1983, from George R. Long, Executive Director of V ACO regarding JLARC public hearing on local mandates and financial resources of local governments Letter dated October 19, 1983, from Mary Parker, Roanoke city Clerk, regarding Resolution No. 26737 approving and endorsing Articles of Incorporation of the Regional Partnership of Roanoke Valley, Inc. Letter dated October 10, 1983, from Joel M. Schlanger, Director of Finance for Roanoke City, regarding the new bulk sewage rate Letter dated October 10, 1983, from Joel M. Schlanger, Director of Finance for Roanoke City, regarding the new bulk water rate Letter dated October 19, 1983, from George W. Nester, Town Manager of Vinton, regarding the development of a West County water supply Memorandum from Virginia Municipal League dated October 13, 1983, regarding C & P Telephone Company rate increase req ues t 8;-----Bt~-connnM1~~-~~--hrternn-~gn---Reso~on- 9.-----8Hi~e~M~ee-R~~--F~al~ORSHMftfl4s---HeS6HKf6ft 1:&;- - - - - - Bid -€ommH:-tee- R-epori:- - -'Pelephone- -6ormtl1:an ts- - -R-e~tttion 11. Bid Committee Report: Legal Services - Resolution 12. Letter to U. S. Environmental Protection Agency from the State Water Control Board requesting status for Roanoke County's 205 (j) Watershed Planning Grant proposal 13. Accounts paid - September, 1983 14. Accounts paid - October, 1983 1-50.. - - - - - Fiftaftei1tl-Rel'OI"t- - i\-nalysis- for- -period ~flg- 6-3& -and- f)-59-83 16. Staff study for future use of the existing Roanoke County Courthouse 17. Letter from the Office of the Governor dated October 24, 1983, regarding development of Hollins Park. 18. Report authorizing Change Orders 2 and 3, Glade Creek Interceptor Project 81-1-S - Resolution 19. Report: Roanoke River Interceptor permit to cross Norfolk & Western Right-of-Way - Resolution 20. Letter from State Office of Emergency and Energy Services dated October 26, 1983, regarding designation of Roanoke County as a natural disaster area. 21. Letter from Virginia Water Project dated october 27, 1983, regarding meeting to discuss water services for low-income families. 22. Treasurer's Report - July, 1983. 23. Treasurer's Report - August, 1983. 11-9-83 ,-.. )f ~! 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. Adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Supervisors Nickens, Minter, Burton, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Myers RESOLUTION NO. 83-200.a AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 83-147 APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS BY AND BETWEEN ROANOKE COUNTY AND CERTAIN DEVELOPERS IN CONNECTION WITH THE GLADE CREEK INTERCEPTOR PROJECT, TO PROVIDE FOR A COMMENCEMENT DATE OF THE TEN (10) YEAR REIMBURSEMENT PERIOD BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that Resolution No. 83-147 be amended to read and provide as follows: 1. That the execution of certain reimbursement agreements by and between Roanoke County and certain developers in connection with the Glade Creek Interceptor Project be, and hereby is, approved as follows: Fr alin and Waldron $126,680 (41.7696) Roanoke Valley Development Corporation and the Greater Roanoke Valley Development F ounda tion Roanoke County Land Venture $ 10,902 $ 15,000 (3.5996) (4.9496) 2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreements upon a form approved by the County Attorney on behalf of Roanoke County; and 3. That said reimbursement contracts executed pursuant hereto shall contain among other provisions a commencement date for the ten year reimbursement period which shall not be earlier than the date upon which actual sewer connections can be made to the Glade Creek sewer interceptor as established in writing by the Superintendent of Public Facilities. Adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Supervisors Nickens, Minter, Burton, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Myers 20 J '1 11-9-83 RESOLUTION NO. 83-200.b ACCEPTING A CERTAIN BID MADE TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE FOR LEGAL SERVICES TO ASSIST THE COUNTY ATTORNEY BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain bid of Gardner, Moss, Brown and Rocovich in the amount of $85.00 per hour for consultation, review plus expenses incurred; $100.00 per hour for actual litigation plus any expenses incurred; $23.00 per hour for work of paralegals; $15.00 per hour for work of secretaries, being the best bid submitted for legal services to assist the County Attorney, upon all and singular the terms and conditions of the invitation to bid, the specifications of the County of Roanoke, the bidder's proposals, and the provisions of this resolution, be, and the same hereby is ACCEPTED; and 2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract upon a form approved by the County Attorney for this service; and 3. That all other bids for this service are hereby rejected and the County Clerk is directed to so notify such bidders and express the County's appreciation for the submission of their bids. Adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Supervisors Nickens, Minter, Burton, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Myers RESOLUTION NO. 83-200.c On motion made by Supervisor Minter, the General Assembly Appropriation Resolution of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 14, 1983, be, and is the same hereby amended as follows to become effective November 9, 1983: INCREASE (DECREASE) DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER Class: Fund: Department: Expenditures General Superintendent of Public Facilities Professional Services -" Object: 03-6-04000-30020 $2,400 Department: Employee Benefits Object: Reserve for Reclassi- fication 03-6-09102-10015 (2,400) 11-9-83 ") [" ~c . f ~ r~..~ .J Adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Supervisors Nickens, Minter, Burton, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Myers RESOLUTION NO. 83-200.d AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 AND 3A FOR PROJECT 81-1-S, GLADE CREEK INTERCEPTOR BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board does hereby authorize the issuance of Change Orders No.2 and 3A to the contract for Project 81-1-S, Glade Creek Interceptor, the same to be in the following words and figures, to-wit: Change Order No.2: Shift sewer away from creek- one addi tional manhole and seven additional feet of pipe Add $1,026.00 Change Order No. 3A: Additional engineering services for alignment of sewer lines and manholes - Grissom property Add $ 567.11 Adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Supervisors Nickens, Minter, Burton, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Myers RESOLUTION NO. 83-200.e APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE A CERTAlli NORFOLK & WESTERN RAILWAY PERMIT AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE ROANOKE RIVER INTERCEPTOR EXTENSION PROJECT BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain Norfolk & Western Railway permit agreement authorizing Roanoke County to place a portion of the Duiquid Lane sewer extension relating to the Roanoke River Interceptor extension project in the Norfolk & Western Railway Co. right-of-way at an annual permit fee not to exceed $250.00, be, and hereby is, approved and confirmed; and 2. That the County Administrator be, and hereby is, authorized and directed to execute said permit agreement on behalf of Roanoke County, the same to be in form approved by the County Attorney. -) \. ,) ~ l)\ "" ,::.." \J' 11-9-83 Adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Supervisors Nickens, Minter, Burton, Johnson None Supervisor Myers IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Burton - no report. Supervisor Minter - no report. Supervisor Nickens - moved that the County Attorney draft legislation to local delgates expressing the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors interest in impelementing the telephone emergency number E-911 Program. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. Supervisor Nickens also reviewed the status of the Vinton Library, indicating that Mr. George Garretson, Library Director, is reviewing the alternatives for another temporary location because the current temporary facilities at the Vinton Municipal Building will have to be vacated due to renovation. Supervisor Johnson - presented the following proclamation for American Education Week. Those present to receive it were Superintendent of Roanoke County Schools, Bayes Wilson; Chairman of the Roanoke County School Board, James Wymer; Chairperson of American Education Week Committee, Garland Kidd; Roanoke County County Council PT A President, Bill Reid; and Roanoke County Education Representative, Ms. Shelby Thomason. PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the public schools are an important and integral part of our society; and WHEREAS, the concept of a free and equal education is an American tradition and this country's strength; and WHEREAS, all citizens have a responsibility to support the public schools. NOW, THEREFORE, I, May W. Johnson, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do hereby proclaim November 13 - 19, 1983, as AMERICAN EDUCATION WEEK 11-9-83 2 () ii, in Roanoke County and urge all citizens to make a commitment to public education and to the future of Roanoke County children by visiting their local public schools and by donating their time and talents to help make the public schools even better. The following proclamation was also presented by Chairman Johnson regarding National Adoption Week: PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, over 500 local groups of adoptive parents and concerned citizens comprising The North American Council on Adoptable Children recognize the essential value of belonging to a secure, loving, permanent family as every child's basic right; and WHEREAS, at least 750,000 American children are growing up without permanent family attachments, at public expense; and WHEREAS, for at least 150,000 of these children - including many minority children, SChool-age children, and children with special physical, mental, and emotional needs - adoption by capable parents is the most viable option to insure their long-range well being; and WHEREAS, for the eighth year, The North American Council on Adoptable Children has designated Thanksgiving week as National Adoption Week to focus collective attention on the urgency and importance of providing waiting children permanence; and WHEREAS, a variety of media, agencies, adoptive parent and advocacy groups, civic and church groups, businesses and industries will feature publicity and information to heighten community awareness of the crucial needs of waiting children during Adoption Week; and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to support and extend this national observance. NOW, THEREFORE, I, May W. Johnson, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do hereby designated the week of November 20 - 26, 1983, as NATIONAL ADOPTION WEEK in Roanoke County, and bring this important need to the attention of all citizens, urging their full participation and support. 205 11-9-83 CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING ON THE EST ABLISHMENT OF A SIX-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM FOR THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF THE STATE HIGHWAYS FOR THE FISCAL YEARS 1983-84 AND 1984-85. ADOPTED Superintendent of the Department of Public Facilities, John Hubbard, reviewed the status indicating that an addition to the Plan was the continuation of a study on Sugar Loaf Mountain Road to determine other alternatives. He recommended the Board adopt the Plan as recommended. Supervisor Burton moved for adoption of the proposed Six-Year Plan, and that a resolution be prepared by the County Attorney and spread in the Minutes. RESOLUTION NO. 83-201 APPROVING CERTAIN PRIORITIES FOR ROANOKE COUNTY'S SIX YEAR PLAN FOR HIGHW AY IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE COUNTY BY THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to public hearing duly held by the Board of Supervisors on October 25, 1983, and continued to November 9, 1983, the Board of Supervisors duly heard public comment on a certain priority list for highway improvements in Roanoke County to be made as part of a Six Year Plan by the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation, and did duly consider same as set forth on that certain priority list bearing date of November 9, 1983, on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors and does hereby approve, ratify and confirm said aforementioned Six Year priority list; and 2. That an attested copy of this resolution be forthwith forwarded to the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation, Salem Residency. Adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Supervisors Nickens, Minter, Burton, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT Supervisor Myers 11-9-83 206 REQUEST OF WILEY AND NADINE McGUIRE FOR A SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO PLACE A MOBILE HOME ON A 23-ACRE TRACT LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF STATE ROUTE 667 APPROXIMATELY 0.5 MILE FROM THE INTERSECTION OF STATE ROUTES 666 AND 667 IN THE CAVE'SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. APPROVED Mr. McGuire was present. There being no opposition, Supervisor Minter moved that the special exception be granted, and the motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. REQUEST OF DALLAS W. PARRISH TO PLACE A MOBILE HOME ON A 2.0-ACRE TRACT TO BE OCCUPIED BY HIS SON, DALLAS WAYNE PARRISH, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF A PRIVATE ROAD AT THE END OF STATE ROUTE 603 IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS VARIANCE ISSUED AS TO NON-OWNER OCCUP ANY, OCTOBER 19, 1983. APPROVED Mr. Parrish, Sr. was present. There was no opposition, and Supervisor Minter moved that the permit be granted. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. REQUEST OF GLORIA B. GUTHRIE TO PLACE A MOBILE HOME ON A .42-ACRE TRACT WITH AN EXISTING DWELLING TO BE OCCUPIED BY HER SON, LARRY GUTHRIE, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF STATE ROUTE 845 APPROXIMATELY 0.5 MILES FROM THE INTERSECTION OF STATE ROUTES 676 AND 845 IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS VARIANCE ISSUED AS TO NON-OWNER OCCUPANY, OCTOBER 19, 1983. APPROVED Mr. Guthrie was present. There being no opposition to the request, Supervisor Minter moved that the permit be granted; and the motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. REQUEST OF MARSHALL DOOLEY. JR. TO PLACE A MOBILE HOME ON A loO-ACRE TRACT WITH AN EXISTING DWELLING TO BE OCCUPIED BY MR. AND MRS. MARSHALL DOOLEY, JR. LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF STATE ROUTE 913 APPROXIMATELY 0.33 MILES FROM THE INTERSECTION OF STATE ROUTE 641 AND 913 IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS VARIANCE ISSUED AS TO NON-OWNER OCCUPANCY AND EXISTING DWELLILNG, OCTOBER 19, 1983. APPROVED 20 7 1 11-9-83 There was no opposition. Mr. Dooley was present. Supervisor Minter moved that the request be granted, and the motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. PETITION OF MARTHA W. WILLIAMS, WARREN F. WILLIAMS, AND THOMAS L. WILLIAMS REQUESTING REZONING FROM B-2 TO M-l OF A TRACT CONTAINING .32 ACRES AND LOCATED AT LOTS 22, 23, and 24 - 5635 WILLIAMSON ROAD, N. W., ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. APPROVED Mr. Thomas L. Williams was present and explained that the rezoning was requested in order to operate a car care center in an existing building. There was no opposition, and Supervisor Minter moved to grant the petition. FINAL ORDER NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned tract of land, more particularly described below, be rezoned from B-2 to M-1. The property of Warren F. Williams, Martha P. Williams, and Thomas L. Williams being Lots 22, 23, and 24 which border U. S. Route # 11. Starting at existing iron pin, corner of Lot 24, N 30 00 ' W, 111.6' to corner of Lot 22, N 780 31 'E, 172.3' to existing iron pin at opposite corner of Lot 22, 5550 00' W. 283.6' to starting iron pin at corner of lot 24. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the County Planner and that he be and hereby is directed to reflect that change on the official zoning maps of the County. Adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Supervisors Nickens, Minter, Burton, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT Supervisor Myers PETITION OF BRANCH (\ ASSOCIATES, INC., CENTURY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, GEORGE W. LOGAN, AND JAMES F. DOUTHAT REQUESTING REZONING FROM R-l and B-1 to B-2 OF A TRACT CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 2.919 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, SITUA TED IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT OF ROANOKE COUNTY APPROVED Mr. James F. Douthat, one of the petitioners, was present and represented the other petitioners. He offered a petition signed by 45 adjacent neighbors in favor of the new car dealership to be leased to Valley Motorsport, Incorporated. 11-9-83 ":> (' -~ -"-) joy .J t') Supervisor Minter moved that the rezoning petition be granted. FINAL ORDER NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED that at this meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held on the 9th day of November, 1983, the said County Zoning Ordinance be, and the same is hereby amended so as to reclassify the property described in said petition from Residential District R-1 and Business District B-1 to Business District B-2 in order that said property might be more fully and reasonably used, the said property being located in the County of Roanoke, State of Virginia, and more particularly described as follows: A certain tract of land bounded by Virginia Highway No. 117 (Peters Creek Road), St. Phillips Lutheran Church, Lots 1 through 6 Tinker Knoll and the thirty foot road adjacent to the property of Thomas L. Powers and Frances L. Powers designated on Roanoke County Property Identification Map No. 14, Insert 14c, AS PARCEL "B" and on Roanoke County Property Identification Map No. 15 as Parcel 30 and bearing Tax Bill No. 306442. Said zoning to be subject to the following conditions: a. A ten OO)-foot strip of land along the westerly boundaries of the property adjoining Parcel "A" and Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 of Tinker Knoll Subdivision shall not contain any structures or parking facilities and shall remain in a natural state, to act as a buffer between the property to be rezoned and the designated parcel and lots in Tinker Knoll Subdivision. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Clerk of this Board shall forthwith certify a copy of this resolution and order to the Secretary of the Planning Commission of Roanoke County, Virginia, and a copy to Hazlegrove, Dickinson, Rea, Smeltzer & Brown, attorneys for the petitioner. Adopted by the following roll call vote: A YES: Supervisors Nickens, Minter, Burton, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Myers 2 () 9 11-9-83 PETITION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO AMEND ARTICLE II, PUBLIC DANCE HALL OF CHAPTER 4 AMUSEMENTS OF THE CODE OF ROANOKE COUNTY PERTAINING TO DEFINITION AND PERMITS REQUIRED. ADOPTED Supervisor Nickens moved the following prepared ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 83-202 AMENDING ARTICLE II. PUBLIC DANCE HALLS OF CHAPTER 4. AMUSEMENTS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Article II. Public Dance Hall of Chapter 4. Amusements of the Roanoke County Code be amended to read and provide as follows: Article II. Public Dance Halls. Sec. 4-2. "Public dance hall" defined. A "public dance hall" shall be construed to mean any place where dancing is permitted to which an admission fee is charged, or for which compensation is in any manner received, either directly or indirectly, by cover charge or otherwise; or where refreshments or food or any form of merchandise are served for compensation before, during, or after dancing. The sale of any refreshments, food, or any form of merchandise at such place, or the exhibiting of such for sale, shall be deemed direct compensation for any such dance hall as is contemplated by this article. Any place where any club, association, corporation, organization, or group of persons conduct, operate, or permit dances. This article, however, shall not apply to dances held for benevolent or charitable purposes when the same are conducted under the auspices of religious, civic, charitable, educational, or military organizations, or those dances held at private clubs. However, a restaurant licensed to serve food and beverages and having a dance floor with an area not exceeding ten percent (10 %) of the total floor area of the establishment shall not be considered a public dance hall and shall not be required to obtain a special exception. Sec. 4-4. Special Exception Required. (a) Required. It shall be unlawful for any person to operate a public dance hall until such time as he has secured a special exception from the Board of Supervisors in accordance with the provisions of Chapter ~ of this Code. (b) Application fee. An application for such special exception shall be filed with the county administrator, with a fee set ~ separate resolution for the processing thereof. (c) Investigation, issuance, and revocation. The county administrator shall cause such investigation as he deems necessary to be made in order to ensure that the public dance hall shall be operated in accordance with the provisions of this Code. The special exception shall be revocable should the operation of such public dance hall be found to violate any provision of law in this Code or in the Code of Virginia. In causing such investigation to be made, the county administrator shall ensure that the proper business license has been applied and paid for and shall further insure that the persons who are operating such public dance hall have not been convicted of any criminal offense other than traffic violations. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. 11-9-83 '-'1\ ~J()1 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. Adopted by the he following roll call vote: AYES: Supervisors Nickens, Minter, Burton, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Myers PETITION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR TO AMEND ARTICLE IX AND X (BUSINESS DISTRICT B-2 and B-3) OF CHAPTER 21 ZONING OF THE CODE OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO INCLUDE PUBLIC DANCE HALLS AS PERMITTED USES WITH SPECIAL EXCEPTION. ADOPTED Supervisor Burton moved the following prepared ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 83-203 AMENDING CHAPTER 21. ZONING OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE RELATING TO THE USE OF STRUCTURES FOR PUBLIC DANCE HALLS WITHIN ROANOKE COUNTY BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Chapter 21. Zoning of the Roanoke County Code relating to the permitted uses of "public dance halls" be amended to read and provide as follows: Article IX. B-2 Business District Sec. 21-67. Permitted uses. In Business District B-2, buildings to be erected or land to be used shall be for one or more of the following uses: * * * * (6) Public billiard parlors and poolrooms, bowling alleys, golf driving ranges and similar forms of public amusement only after a public hearing shall have been held by the governing body on an application submitted to the body for such use. The governing body may request that the commission submit a recommendation to them concerning such application. In approving any such application, the governing body may establish such special requirements and regulations for the protection of adjacent property, set the hours of operation,a and make requirements as they may deem necessary in the public interest. * * * * (12) Public dance halls, subject to the provisions of Article II. Chapter 4 of this Code and upon a special exception being approved by the Board of Supervisors. Article X. B-3 Business District. 211 , 11-9-83 Sec. 21-73. Permitted uses. In Business District B-3, buildings to be erected or land to be used shall be for one or more of the following uses: * * * * (7) Public dance halls, subject to the provisions of Article II. Chapter 4 of this Code and upon a special exception being approved by the Board of Supervisors. When located as an accessory use to a restaurant where food and beverages are served; such dance floor shall not have an area exceeding ten percent (10 %) of the total floor area of the restaurant. This floor area shall be calculated so as to exclude restrooms, hallways, storage, kitchen and office areas. This amendment to be in full force from and after its passage. Adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Supervisors Nickens, Minter, Burton, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Myers PETITION OF THE CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL TO AMEND SECTION 7-7 ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 7 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO ADOPT NEW PROCEDURES REGARDING UNSAFE BUILDINGS. ADOPTED Superintendent of the Department of Development, Timothy Gubala explained that this ordinance relates to structural conditions only and not health hazards. After making some gramatical corrections and inserting an appropriate statement addressing liens, Supervisor Nickens moved the following prepared ordinance as amended: ORDINANCE NO. 83-204 AMENDING CHAPTER 7. BUILDING, ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING CODES BY THE ADOPTION OF A NEW SECTION 7-7. UNSAFE BUILDINGS ORDINANCE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Section 7-7. Certain unsafe buildings of Article I. Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code be, and hereby is, repealed; and 2. That a new Section 7-7. Unsafe Buildings Ordinance be, and hereby is, adopted to read and provide as follows: Article I. Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code Sec. 7-7. Unsafe Buildings Ordinance. The following regulations shall apply to buildings and structures which are or hereafter may be determined to be unsafe under the terms of this ordinance, not withstanding that buildings an structures erected after the enactment of the 11-9-83 ') 1 2... h.I Uniform Statewide Building Code shall be regulated under the provIsIons of that Code, except that if the construction of such buildings or structures were exempt form that Code then the provisions of this Ordinance shall apply. Sec. 7-7:1. Right of Condemnation. All buildings or structures that are or hereafter shall become unsafe, unsanitary, or deficient in adequate exitway facilities, or which constitute a fire hazard, or are otherwise dangerous to human life or the public welfare, or which by reason of illegal or improper use, occupancy or maintenance, shall be deemed unsafe buildings or structures. All unsafe buildings shall be taken down and removed or made safe, sanitary or secure, as the Chief Building Official may deem necessary and as provided in this section. A vacant building, unguarded or open at door or window, shall be deemed a fire hazard and unsafe within the meaning of this ordinance. Sec. 7-7:2. Examination and Record of Damaged Building. The Chief Building Official shall examine every building or structure reported as dangerous, unsafe structurally or constituting a fire hazard; and shall prepare a report to be filed in the records of the department. The report shall include the use of the building, and the nature and extent of damages, if any. Sec. 7-7:3. Notice of Unsafe Building. If an unsafe condition is found in a building or structure, the Chief Building Official shall serve on the owner, agent or person in control of the building or structure a written notice describing the building or structure deemed unsafe and specifying the required repairs or improvements to be made to render the building or structure safe and secure, or requiring the unsafe building or structure or portion thereof to be demolished within a stipulated time. Such notice shall require the person thus notified to immediately declare to the Chief Building Official his acceptance or rejection of the terms of the order. Sec. 7-7:4. Restoration of Unsafe Building. A building or structure condemned by the Chief Building Official may be restored to safe condition provided no change of use or occupancy is contemplated or compelled by reason of such reconstruction or restoration. Sec. 7-7:5. Posting Unsafe Notice. If the person addressed with an unsafe notice cannot be found within the County after diligent search, then such notice shall be sent by registered or certified mail to the last known address of such person; and a copy of the unsafe notice shall be posted in a conspicuous place on the premises; and such procedure shall be deemed the equivalent of personal notice. Sec. 7-7:6. Disregard of Unsafe Notice. Upon refusal or neglect of the person served with an unsafe notice to comply with the requirements of the order to abate the unsafe condition, the legal authority of Roanoke County shall be advised of all the facts and he shall institute the appropriate action to compel compliance. Sec. 7-7:7. Vacating Buildings. When, in the opinion of the Chief Building Official, there is actual and immediate danger of failure or collapse of a building or structure or any part thereof which would endanger life, or when any structure or part of a structure 213 11-9-83 has fallen and life is endangered by the occupation of the building, the Chief Building Official is hereby authorized and empowered to order and require the inmates and occupants to vacate the same forthwith. He shall cause to be posted at each entrance to such building a notice reading as follows: "THIS BUILDING IS UNSAFE AND ITS USE OR OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN PROHIBITED BY THE COUNTY BUILDING OFFICIAL." and it shall be unlawful for any person to enter such building or structure except for the purpose of making the required repairs or of demolishing the same. Sec. 7-7:8. Closing Streets. When necessary for the public safety, the Chief Building Official may temporarily close sidewalks, streets, buildings and structures and places adjacent to such unsafe buildings, and prohibit the same from being used. Sec. 7-7:9. Cost of Repairs or Demolition. The cost of making required repairs or of demolishing the building, as the case may be, is the responsibility of the owner or his agent, and should the owner fail to make such ordered repairs, the County may proceed to either make such repairs or demolish the unsafe, unsanitary or insecure structure after notice as herein provided, and the cost to the County of such work shall be and constitute a lien against the real estate upon which such work is performed. Sec. 7-7:10. Appeal. A decision rendered by the Chief Building Official in the enforcement of this Ordinance may be appealed to the Board of Supervisors, provided such appeal is made within thirty (30) days in a manner and form to be specified by the Chief Building 0 fficial; provided, however, that a decision rendered under Sections VII and VIII is not subject to appeal. Before rendering a decision in favor of the appellant, the Board of Supervisors must serve as a committee of the whole and conduct an on-site investigation of the building(s) or structure(s) in question and clearly determine that the condition of the same poses no threat to the health, safety, or general welfare of the citizens of Roanoke County. Sec. 7-7:11. Severability. Should any section or provision of this ordinance be found unconstitutional or declared invalid by the Courts, such decision shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole, or any part thereof other than the part so held to be unconstitutional or invalid. Adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Supervisors Nickens, Minter, Burton, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Myers IN RE: CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS The Clearbrook residents for water requested that their request be deleted from the agenda until after the elections. 11-9-83 21 ~1 IN RE: REPORTS OF OFFICERS, DEPARTMENTS, AND COMMITTEES County Attomey - stated that his oral report on Raintree Road was only an interim report because he has not had an opportunity to research the history of Raintree Road. Supervisor Nickens moved to hold the matter over until a complete report is available, and the motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. Supervisor Burton then asked the status on the Hickory Hills litigation. The County Attorney informed her that he has written to the judge asking that the court be reconvened, and he is awaiting a court date. Department of Development - Superintendent, Timothy Gubala, presented an oral report on the Subdivision Ordinance, which has been worked on by the staff, Planning Commission, and the Board of Supervisors since 1979. Pursuant to the last work session, the County Attorney and Mr. Gubala were to investigate the Ordinance, make corrections, and bring it back to the Board. In doing this it was discovered that technical requirements are incorporated in the text of the ordinance. The staff is comparing Roanoke County's needs with those of other Counties. A committee will review the intent of the ordinance, and Supervisor Nickens recommended the entire Board serve on this commiteee. Supervisor Burton moved to approve the staff's approach and to give the Subidivision Ordinance every priority. The motion was approved by a unanimous voice vote. Department of Public Facilities - Superintendent John Hubbard presented an update on a new site for the Bent MOWltain Refuse Project. The property is owned by the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation; and when negotiations are complete, the new site will consist of a two-tier type disposal system with a target completion date of February, 1984. Department of Fiscal Management - Superintendent John Chambliss reported on the results of the auction of surplus property which took place on November 5, 1983. Mr. Chambliss then reviewed the unaudited results of the general fund operation for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1983 and the quarter ending September 30, 1983. The total operating revenue was $33,494,623, and the total ') -1" E:::' ... ,-'. ,) . 11-9-83 operating expense was $12,025,397. Most revenue items have been on target with the exception of sales tax, which fluctuates as a result of seasonal buying. This financial analysis refers to Item '15 which was deleted from the Consent Agenda of this Meeting. Personnel - Personnel Officer, Keith Cook, informed the Board that employee meetings were held regarding input on the Employees' Health Plan. One item of particular concern was the retired employee and his dependents eligibility for health insurance. This matter is to be studied further. County Administrator - Donald R. Flanders outlined the information realtive to Roanoke County's participation in the Virginia Innovation Group. Supervisor Nickens moved the following prepared resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 83-205 PARTICIPATION OF ROANOKE "VIRGINIA INNOVATION GROUP" AUTHORIZING COUNTY IN THE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: .. 1. That the County of Roanoke, through its appropriate officers and employees, be, and hereby is, authorized to fully participate in the Virginia Innovation Group; and 2. That the County Administrator be, and hereby is, authorized and directed to prepare and submit an appropriate application for membership in the Virginia Innovation Group, upon form approved by the County Attorney, and to pay Roanoke County's first annual membership fee to said Virginia Innovation Group on or before November 30, 1983; and 3. That the General Appropriation Resolution of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 14, 1983, be, and same hereby is, amended as follows to become effective November 9, 1983: INCREASE (DECREASE) DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER Class: Fund: Department: Object: Expendi tures General Operating Board of Supervisors Dues 03-6-01101-58010 $3,500 ($3,500) Department: Unappropriated Balance 03-6-99999-99999 11-9-83 i;) 1 6 .- f~~,' .""- ...f Adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Supervisors Nickens, Minter, Burton, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Myers At their October 20, 1983 Board of Directors Meeting the Mental Health Services of Roanoke Valley passed revisions to their by-laws which included Botetourt County as a member of the Community Services Board. Supervisor Burton moved the following prepared resolution: RESOLUTION NO.83-206 CONCURRING IN AND RATIFYING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE BY-LAWS OF MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That those certain amendments to the by-laws of Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley as fully set out in a certain report and request dated October 25, 1983, directed to the County Administrator and on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County submitted by Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley be, and same are hereby, concurred in and approved, ratified, and confirmed as if set out herein in full; and 2. That the Clerk to the Board be, and hereby is, directed to file and maintain as a permanent record of his office true and correct copies of said report and amended by-laws; and 3. That an attested copy of this resolution be forthwith forwarded to the Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley. Adopted by the following roll call vote: A YES: Supervisors Nickens, Minter, Burton, Johnson NA YS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Myers Mr. Flanders recommended the appointment of Mr. Charles Saul to the Site Selection Committee of the Regional Partnership of Roanoke Valley. Supervisor Minter moved for the appointment, and the motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. The County Attorney has verified that there is no conflict of interest with Mr. Saul serving as Chairman of the Industrial Development Authority. ') ,. ? ."" , ., - " 11-9-83 A calendar of events was given to the Board reminding them of the Virginia Association of Counties Meeting at the Homestead November 14 to 16; the breakfast with the legislators at Wilson's Restaurant scheduled for Novem ber 21 at 7:30 a.m., and the Background Session for disclosure of holdings with the Commonwealth Attorney on November 10 at 9:00. IN RE: APPOINTMENTS Supervisor Minter moved to appoint Timothy W. Gubala as the Roanoke County Representative to the 208 Roanoke Valley Water Quality Advisory Management Board to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Gary J. Minter, and the motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION At 9:05 p.m. Supervisor Burton moved to go into Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia, Section 2.1-334(a) (1), (2), (4) and (6) to discuss personnel, real estate, location of a prospective business or industry, and legal matters. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. IN RE: OPEN SESSION Supervisor Nickens moved to go into Open Session at 10:56 p.m. to stop the clock, and the motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION Supervisor Nickens then moved to return to Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia, Section 2.1-344(a) (1), (4), and (6) to discuss personnel, location of a prospective business or industry, and legal matters. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. IN RE: ADJOURNMENT Supervisor Minter moved to return to Open Session at 10 :59 p.m, and the motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. There being no further business, Supervisor Minter moved to adjourn the meeting, and the motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. }~~~~/ Ii ,Chat an i,J1