12/13/1983 - Special
"",
12-13-83
}~ {~l (i
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Center
3738 Brambleton Avenue, S. W.
Roanoke, V A 24015
December 13, 1983
The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day
in open session at the Roanoke County Administration Center, Roanoke, Virginia,
this being the second Tuesday, and the first regular meeting of the month of
December, 1983.
IN RE:
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Johnson called the meeting to order at 3:06 p.m. The roll
call was taken:
MEMBERS PRESENT
Chairman, May W. Johnson; Supervisors Athena E.
Burton, Robert E. Myers
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Vice Chairman, Harry C. Nickens; Supervisor Gary J.
Minter
IN RE:
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Supervisor Burton moved to go into Executive Session pursuant to
the Code of Virginia, Section 2.1-344(a) (2), (4), and (6) to discuss personnel, real
estate, and legal matters. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. Supervisor
Minter arrived during the Executive Session at 4:00 p.m.
IN RE:
OPEN SESSION
Supervisor Minter moved to return to open session at 5:28 p.m., and
the motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. Supervisor Myers moved for a
dinner recess until 7 :00 p.m., and the motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
IN RE:
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Johnson called the regular meeting to order at 7:02 p.m.
The roll call was taken:
,.,"~'.l 4
C) !1. 'j
.~,
12-13-83
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chairman, May W. Johnson; Supervisors Athena E.
Burton, Gary J. Minter, Robert E. Myers
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Vice Chairman, Harry C. Nickens
IN RE:
OPENING CEREMONIES
Reverend Russell Smith, of Our Lady of Nazareth Catholic Church,
offered the invocation. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present.
IN RE:
CONSENT AGENDA
Supervisor Burton made a correction to the Minutes of November 21,
1983, designating "Supervisors Elect" in lieu of "Newly Elected Supervisors" in the
Call To Order.
Chairman Johnson noted that in Item # 6 the Advanced Life
Support Equipment for Fire and Emergency Services was for the Hollins area.
Supervisor Minter moved the Consent Agenda as corrected.
RESOL UTION NO. 83-215 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE
DESIGNATED AS ITEM B - CONSENT AGENDA
BE. IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
as follows:
1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors
for December 13. 1983, designated as Item B - Consent Agenda be, and hereby
is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section
designated as Items 1 through 21, inclusive, as follows:
1. Approval of minutes of October 25, 1983; November 1, 1983;
and November 9, 1983 meetings.
2. Bid Committee Report: Paving overlays - Walrond Park, Craig
Avenue Recreation Center, and Gladetown Park - Resolution.
3. Bid Committee Report: Fitness Trail - Resolution.
4. Bid Committee Report: Miscellaneous vehicles for Utility
Department - Resolution.
5. Bid Committee Report: Type II Van Ambulance for Fort Lewis
Rescue Squad - Resolution.
6. Bid Committee Report: Advanced Life Support Equipment for
Fire and Emergency Services - Resolution.
7.
Bid Committee Report:
- Resolution.
Word Processing Equipment
8. Bid Committee Report: Motor Fire Apparatus - Resolution.
~
12-13-83
~) A !.~>...' f
t~../ ...t ...~,
9. Bid Committee Report: Tax Forms - Resolution.
10. Accounts Paid - November, 1983.
11. Financial Statements for period ending October 31, 1983.
12. Report on publication of Annual Report - Resolution.
13. Report on contract for professional services (Financial Advisor)
- Resolution.
14. Report on funds needed for Telephone Maintenance Agreement
- Appropriation Resolution.
15. Report on contract for professional services (Interior Design)
- Resolution.
16. Treasurer's Reports - September, 1983; October, 1983.
17. Certification of several elections held in Roanoke County
- November 10, 1983, for both state and local officials.
18. Letter dated November 1, 1983, from the Virginia Department
of Health regarding change in date of payment for State E.M .S.
funds.
19. Amendment to Resolution 83-213 clarifying the calculating of
building and zoning fees - Resolution.
20. Letter dated November 11, 1983, from Salem Health Department
regarding home health care.
21. Letter dated November 11, 1983, from Division of Industrial
Development regarding Virginia Community College System
participation at the Virginia Economic Development Seminar
on December 14, 1983, in Fredericksburg, Virginia.
22. Letter dated November 29, 1983, from the Virginia Department
of Highways and Transportation regarding public transportation
funding for FY 1985.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where
required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation
for any such item pursuant to this resolution.
-----".~--_..._.._~.._._..._....._--~
"----'
12-13-83
~?
o
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NA YS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
RESOLUTION NO. 83-215.c ACCEPTING A CERTAIN
BID MADE TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE FOR THREE
PICK UP TR UCKS TO BE PLACED IN SERVICE BY THE
UTILITY DEPARTMENT
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County. Virl!inia.
940
(.. u
12-13-83
1.
That that certain bid of S. R. Draper, Inc. in the amount of $16,155.24,
being the best bid submitted for overlay paving of parking areas at the Walrond
Park tennis court and pond overlook, the Craig Avenue Recreation Center, and
the Gladetown Park, upon all and singular the terms and conditions of the invitation
to bid, the specifications of the County of Roanoke, the bidder's proposals, and
the provisions of this resolution, be, and the same hereby is ACCEPTED; and
2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to
enter into a contract upon a form approved by the County Attorney for this
project; and
3. That all other bids for this project are hereby rejected and the
County Clerk is directed to so notify such bidders and express the County's
appreciation for the submission of their bids.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter Burton, Myers, Johnson
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
RESOLUTION NO. 83-215.b ACCEPTING A CERTAIN
BID MADE TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE FOR
DEVELOPMENT OF A NINE STATION FITNESS TRAIL
UNIT FOR THE PENN FOREST PARK
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
as follows:
1. That that certain bid of Alperstein Brothers, Inc. in the amount of
$3,955.75, being the best bid submitted for a purchase contract for development of
a nine station fitness trail unit for the Penn Forest Park, upon all and singular
the terms and conditions of the invitation to bid, the specifications of the County
of Roanoke, the bidder's proposals, and the provisions of this resolution, be, and
the same hereby is ACCEPTED; and
2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to
I
~
enter into a contract upon a form approved by the County Attorney for this
project; and
3. That all other bids for this project are hereby rejected and the
County Clerk is directed to so notify such bidders and express the County's
appreciation for the submission of their bids.
... ..L......______ .c.-._ +t....':" II
---
12-13-83
~)
,-.......J
()
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NA YS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
RESOLUTION NO. 83-215.c ACCEPTING A CERTAIN
BID MADE TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE FOR THREE
PICK UP TR UCKS TO BE PLACED IN SERVICE BY THE
UTILITY D EP AR TM ENT
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
as follows:
1. That that certain bid of Harvest Motors, Inc. in the amount of
$28,408.96, being the best bid submitted for the purchase of three pick up trucks
to be placed in service by the Utility Department, upon all and singular the terms
and conditions of the invitation to bid, the specifications of the County of Roanoke,
the bidder's proposals, and the provisions of this resolution, be, and the same
hereby is ACCEPTED; and
2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to
enter into a contract upon a form approved by the County Attorney for this
purchase; and
3. That all other bids for this purchase are hereby rejected and the
County Clerk is directed to so notify such bidders and express the County's
appreciation for the submission of their bids.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
RESOLUTION NO. 83-215.d ACCEPTING A CERTAIN
BID MADE TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE FOR ONE
TYPE II, V AN AMBULANCE TO BE PLACED IN SERVICE
WITH THE FORT LEWIS RESCUE SQUAD
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
as follows:
1. That that certain bid of First Response, Inc. in the amount of
$36,973.00, being the best bid submitted for one Type II Van Ambulance to be
placed in service with the Fort Lewis Rescue Squad, upon all and singular the
---
~,J '1.:.
'1' ~.~ 1..
~ ~J
12-13-83
terms and conditions of the invitation to bid, the specifications of the County of
Roanoke, the bidder's proposals, and the provisions of this resolution, be, and the
same hereby is ACCEPTED; and
2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to
enter into a contract upon a form approved by the County Attorney for this
purchase; and
3. That all other bids for this purchase are hereby rejected and the
County Clerk is directed to so notify such bidders and express the County's
appreciation for the submission of their bids.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisors Nickens
RESOLUTION NO. 83-215.e ACCEPTING A CERTAIN
BID MADE TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE FOR
CERTAIN ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT FOR
USE AT COUNTY RESCUE 5
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
as follows:
1. That that certain bid of Motorola C & E, Inc. in the amount of
$9,297.00, being the best bid submitted for the purchase of one It APCOR" mobile
radio unit (complete), upon all and singular the terms and conditions of the
invitation to bid, the specifications of the County of Roanoke, the bidder's
proposals, and the provisions of this resolution, be, and the same hereby is
ACCEPTED; and
2. That that certain bid of Physio Control in the amount of $9,013.00,
being the best bid submitted for the purchase of one Life Pak 5 (complete) and
one Life State 100 (complete), upon all and singular the terms and conditions of
the invitation to bid, the specifications of the County of Roanoke, the bidder's
proposals, and the provisions of this resol ution, be, and the sam e hereby is
ACCEPTED; and
3. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to
enter into a contract upon a form approved by the County Attorney for these
purchases; and
----,
12-13-83
",' ,
".J
4. That all other bids for these purchases are hereby rejected and the
County Clerk is directed to so notify such bidders and express the County's
appreciation for the submission of their bids.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NA YS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
RESOLUTION NO. 83-215.f ACCEPTING A CERTAIN BID
MADE TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE FOR THE
PURCHASE OF WORD PROCESSING/DATA
PROCESSING EQ UIPM ENT
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
as follows:
1. That that certain bid of Lanier in the amount of $$88,086.46, being
the best bid submitted for the purchase of word processing/data processing
equipment to include hardward, software, maintenance contracts, delivery and
installation, and training, upon all and singular the terms and conditions of the
invitation to bid, the specifications of the County of Roanoke, the bidder's
proposals, and the provisions of this resolution, be, and the same hereby is
ACCEPTED; and
2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to
enter into a contract upon a form approved by the County Attorney for this
purchase; and
3. That all other bids for this purchase are hereby rejected and the
County Clerk is directed to so notify such bidders and express the County's
appreciation for the submission of their bids.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NA YS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
RESOLUTION NO. 83-215.g ACCEPTING A CERTAIN
BID MADE TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE FOR A
PURCHASE CONTRACT FOR A PUMPER TRUCK TO
BE PLACED IN SERVICE AT FORT LEWIS STATION #9
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
as follows:
~,.'~ \
,) 'i' ~
---J-
12-13-83
1.
That that certain bid of Grumman Emergency Products, Inc. in the
amount of $116,508.00, being the best bid submitted for a purchase contract for
a 1250 gallon per minute pumper truck to be placed in service at Fort Lewis
Station #9, upon all and singular the terms and conditions of the invitation to
bid, the specifications of the County of Roanoke, the bidder's proposals, and the
provisions of this resolution, be, and the same hereby is ACCEPTED; and
2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to
enter into a contract upon a form approved by the County Attorney for this
purchase; and
3. That all other bids for this purchase are hereby rejected and the
County Clerk is directed to so notify such bidders and express the County's
appreciation for the submission of their bids.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
RESOL UTION NO. 83-215.h ACCEPTING A CERTAIN
BID MADE TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE FOR THE
PRINTING OF SPECIALIZED TAX FORMS USED BY THE
DEPARTMENT OF FffiCAL MANAGEMENT AND THE
TREASURER'S OFFICE
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
as follows:
1. That those certain bids as set out below, being the best bids submitted
for the printing of specialized tax forms used by the Department of Fiscal
Management and the Treasurer's Office, upon all and singular the terms and
conditions of the invitation to bid, the specifications of the County of Roanoke,
the bidder's proposals, and the provisions of this resolution, be, and the same
hereby is ACCEPTED as follows:
Auto Decals:
M& W Printers
$6,497.00
Real Estate Tax Notices
Moore's Business Forms
$3,080.00
Utility Bills
Moore's Business Forms
$5,364.00
12-13-83
/1 ,
2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to
enter into a contract upon a form approved by the County Attorney for this
purchase; and
3. That all other bids for this purchase are hereby rejected and the
County Clerk is directed to so notify such bidders and express the County's
appreciation for the submission of their bids.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
RESOLUTION NO. 83-215.i AW ARDING A CONTRACT
FOR THE PUBLICATION OF AN ANNUAL REPORT FOR
THE YEARS 1981-1983 FOR THE COUNTY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
as follows:
1. That that certain proposal of Leisure Publishing in the amount of
$7,100, being the best proposal submitted for publication of an annual report for
the years 1981-1983 for Roanoke County, upon all and singular the terms and
conditions of the invitation to bid, the specifications of the County of Roanoke,
the bidder's proposals, and the provisions of this resolution, be, and the same
hereby is ACCEPTED; and
2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to
enter into a contract upon a form approved by the County Attorney for this
service; and
3. That all other bids for this service are hereby rejected and the
County Clerk is directed to so notify such bidders and express the County's
appreciation for the submission of their bids.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
(;; "^ __ i'Y"
~~) ~
12-13-83
RESOLUTION NO. 83-215.j ACCEPTING A CERTAIN
PROPOSAL MADE TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE
FOR THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OF A FINANCIAL
ADVISOR
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
as follows:
1. That that certain proposal of Horner Barksdale & Company in
accordance with the fees outlined in their proposal, the hourly rate being $37.50,
being the best proposal submitted for the professional services of a financial
advisor who will assist the County of Roanoke in securing financing for its share
of the valley-wide water supply project and any other bonding needs which may
append thereto, upon all and singular the terms and conditions of the invitation
to bid, the specifications of the County of Roanoke, the bidder's proposals, and
the provisions of this resolution, be, and the same hereby is ACCEPTED; and
2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to
enter into a contract upon a form approved by the County Attorney for this
service; and
3. That all other bids for this service are hereby rejected and the
County Clerk is directed to so notify such bidders and express the County's
appreciation for the submission of their bids.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NA YS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
RESOL UTION NO. 83-215.k
On motion by Supervisor Minter, the General Appropriation Resolution of
Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 14, 1983, be, and is the same hereby
amended as follows to become effective December 13, 1983:
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NUMBER
Class:
Fund:
Department:
Object:
Expenditures
General
Buildings and Grounds
Repairs - Other
Equipment 03-6-04302-30048
$ 1,760
Department:
Unappropriated
Balance
03-6-99999-99999
(1,760)
To allocate money to pay the telephone maintenance agreement.
--..."
12-13-83
':1
"
,{1i' .
o ,
f-.~!:
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
RESOLUTION NO. 83-215.1 ACCEPTING A CERTAIN
PROPOSAL MADE TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE
FOR INTERIOR DESIGN SERVICES IN THE OFFICES OF
THE TREASURER AND THE DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPM ENT
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
as follows:
1. That that certain proposal of VVKR in the amount of $3,500, being
the best proposal submitted for interior design services for improvements in
equipment, office layout, and traffic flow in the offices of the Treasurer and the
Department of Development, upon all and singular the terms and conditions of the
invitation to bid, the specifications of the County of Roanoke, the bidder's
proposals, and the provisions of this resolution, be, and the same hereby is
ACCEPTED; and
2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to
enter into a contract upon a form approved by the County Attorney for this
service; and
3. That all other bids for this service are hereby rejected and the
County Clerk is directed to so notify such bidders and express the County's
appreciation for the submission of their bids.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
---
RESOLUTION NO. 83-215.m AMENDING RESOLUTION
NO. 83-213 ESTABLISHING CERTAIN FEES FOR
CERTAIN SERVICES PROVIDED BY ROANOKE COUNTY
THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT FOR
ZONING AND BUILDING RELATED MATTERS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
as follows:
1. That there be, and hereby are, established certain fees for services
provided through the Roanoke County Department of Development relating to
zoning and building services rendered for and on behalf of citizens, which said
fees are as follows, to-wit:
/-
q e~ {1
?:,-," . "II
12-13-83
ZONING FEES
Application Type
Proposed Fee
Variance
$ 45.00*
Special Exception
New Mobile Home
40.00*
Other Type
40.00*
Special Use Permit
20.00
Mobile Home Renewal
15.00
Home Occupation
40.00*
Street Vacation
70.00*
Rezoning
to A-I, RE or R-1
to R-2, R-3 or B-1
to R-4, B-2,B-3, R-5 or R-6
to M-1, M-2, M-3
Use Not Provided For
PUD
115.00*
150.00*
150.00*
140.00*
145.00*
145.00*
Site Plan Review
90.00*
* Advertising costs shall be included in the filing fee and collected at the
time of ;Rlication. In addition to the filing fee there shall be added a
charge of 5.00 per acre or portion thereof.
BUILDING FEES
Proposed Fee
Reinspection fee
$ 10.00
Inspection fee for mobile homes,
offices, new constructions and
alterations
Plumbing
Electrical
10.00
10.00
Inspection before 8:00 a.m. or
after 5:00 p.m.
5.00
(plus regular $10
inspection fee)
Demolition Permit
10.00
Moving of Buildings
10.00
Certificate of Occupancy
(Includes Temporary)
10.00
--
Elevator Inspection
10.00
Annual Elevator Reinspection
10.00
2. Any fees heretofore established and not herein specifically altered
or amended shall remain in full force and effect.
~
12-13-83
,..,. PO'" {:l 1
~~) 0
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
IN RE:
REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
Supervisor Burton - no report.
Supervisor Nickens - absent.
Supervisor Myers - no report.
Supervisor Minter - no report.
Chairman Johnson - reported a grant was received from the Highway
Safety Department for a breatholator, a testing unit, and a radar unit.
IN RE:
PUBLIC HEARINGS
PETITION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO ESTABLISH A
WATER mER RATE IN ROANOKE COUNTY AS FOLLOWS: THE
BASE CHARGE PER EQUIVALENT UNIT SHALL NOT EXCEED $6.93
PER MONTH, AND THE VOLUME CHARGE SHALL NOT EXCEED $.88
PER 1,000 GALLONS.
APPROVED
TO ESTABLISH A SEWER USER RATE IN ROANOKE COUNTY AS
FOLLOWS: THE BASE CHARGE PER EQUIVALENT UNIT SHALL
NOT EXCEED $6.38 PER MONTH, AND THE VOLUME CHARGE SHALL
NOT EXCEED $.80 PER 1,000 GALLONS.
APPROVED
THE RATES APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WILL
BECOME EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1984.
Superintendent of the Department of Fiscal Management, John
Chambliss, presented an extensive comprehensive report which reflected the joint
efforts of the citizens and the County staff in establishing a volume-based water
and sewer rate structure for 1984. The two-tiered system reflects a base charge
to cover the cost of operation and a volume charge reflecting total gallons used.
Citizens present expressing their questions, concerns, and ideas were as follows:
Mr. George Elkins, 5141 Crossbow Circle, S. W., Roanoke; Mr. Curtis E. Mills,
Jr. 5259 Crossbow Circle, S. W., Roanoke; Mr. Jim Powell, 3615 Morning Dove
Road, S. W., Roanoke; Mr. Hugh Key, 5355 Black Bear Lane, Roanoke; and Mrs.
Toni Parsons, 475 Ingal Boulevard, Salem.
//
le\
,?.l _~
~)
12-13-83
Ms. Carolyn Westmoreland, representing The Snyder-Hunt Corporation,
T/ A The Pines, 1701 Tall Oaks Drive, Blacksburg, requested the Board consider a
credit or adjustment for a $16,000 - $22,000 overcharge at The Pines during 1983.
Chairman Johnson advised her that this would be discussed after the Board voted
on the 1984 rates.
Supervisor Minter moved the approval of the the following two
prepared resolutions using the figures listed in Mr. Chambliss' report:
ORDINANCE NO. 83-216 AMENDING SECTION 20.1-27
RATES OF CHAPTER 20.1 WATER OF THE ROANOKE
COUNTY CODE
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
as follows:
1. That Chapter 20.1 Water of the Roanoke County Code be, and hereby
is, amended by amending Section 20.1-27 Rates to read and provide as follows:
Chapter 20.1.
Water.
Article II. Water Systems.
Division 2. County Water System.
Sec. 20.1-27. Rates.
The following rates and charges for water service shall apply where water
service is provided by the County:
SCHEDULE OF BASE CHARGES
(V 01 urn e Based)
1000 Gallons Per Month
Water
o - 10
11 - 14
15 - 17
18 - 28
29 - 39
40 - 54
55 - 69
70 - 111
112 - 153
154 - 210
211 - 267
268 - 440
441 - 613
614 - 853
854 - 1093
1094 - 1400
1401 - 1707
1708 - 2087
2088 - and above
$ 4.55
$ 6.83
$ 11.38
$ 18.88
$ 26.39
$ 36.40
$ 46.87
$ 75.76
$ 104.65
$ 143.55
$ 182.46
$ 300.53
$ 418.60
$ 582.40
$ 746.20
$ 955.50
$1,164.80
$1,424.15
$1,683.50
"'"'
"
12-13-83
')
~:.".;
o f
VOLUME CHARGE
$0.88 per thousand gallons
No bill shall be rendered for less than $4.55 per month. Residential accounts
are payable quarterly, and commercial and industrial accounts are payable monthly,
all bills being due and payable thirty (30) days from date of bill.
2. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
January 1, 1984.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
A YES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NA YS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
ORDINANCE NO. 83-217 AMENDING SECTIONS 16-41,
16-42, AND 16-43 RELATING TO RATES OF CHAPTER
16 SEWERS AND SEW AGE DISPOSAL OF THE ROANOKE
CO UNTY CODE
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
as follows:
1. That Chapter 16 Sewers and Sewage Disposal of the Roanoke County
Code be, and hereby is, amended by adding Article IV. Sewage Disposal Rates and
Charges to read and provide as follows:
CHAPTER 16.
Sewers and Sewage Disposal.
Article IV. Sewage Disposal Rates and Charges
Sec. 16-41. Rates.
The following rates and charges for sewage disposal service apply where
sewage disposal service is provided by the County and metered water service is
utilized:
SCHEDULE OF BASE CHARGES
(V olume Based)
1000 Gallons Per Month
Sewer
o - 10
11 - 14
15 - 17
18 - 28
29 - 39
40 - 54
55 - 69
70 - 111
112 - 153
154 - 210
211 - 267
268 - 440
441 - 613
614 - 853
854 - 1093
1094 - 1400
1401 - 1707
1708 - 2087
2088 - and above
$ 3.99
$ 5.99
$ 9.98
$ 16.56
$ 23.14
$ 31.92
$ 41.10
$ 66.43
$ 91. 77
$ 125.88
$ 160.00
$ 263.54
$ 367.08
$ 510.72
$ 654.36
$ 837.90
$1,021.44
$1,248.87
$1,476.30
/
_il
1
12-13-83
VOLUME CHARGE
$0.76 per thousand gallons
Sec. 16-42. Same.
The following rates and charges for sewage disposal service shall apply
where sewage disposal service is provided by the County and unmetered water
service is utilized:
BASE RATE
Residential
$3.99 per month
Commercial 5x residential
rate or $19.95 per month
VOLUME CHARGE
Residential
$0.76 per 1000 gallons based on
average residential use @
6,000 gallons per month
(Total $4.56)
Commercial 5x residential
rate or $3.80
per 1000 gallons based on
average residential use @
6,000 gallons per month
(Total $22.80)
Sec. 16-43. Minimum billing and payment of bills.
No bill shall be rendered for less than $3.99 per month. Residential accounts
are payable quarterly, and commercial and industrial accounts are payable monthly,
all bills being due and payable thirty (30) days from date of bill.
2. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
January 1, 1984.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
A YES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
Chairman Johnson then asked for clarification of the Board's position
on the 1983 water and sewer rate complaints. Mr. Chambliss then presented the
staff recommended policy considerations as follows:
1. For customers who have paid to have their meter size reduced
because their existing meter was oversized, a credit will be
given towards the 1984 bills (residential customers will be
credited actual cost of change and commercial customers will
be credited $75).
2. For residential customers who wish to have meters changed
back to the original size or enlarge their existing meter, the
12-13-83
t:)
.4r:#
County will install at the expense of the owner.
Commercial
customers must provide change themselves after approval of
the County.
3. All customers must pay existing and future bills for water and
sewer service during 1983 at the 1983 rates.
Chairman Johnson then clarified that the County recommended smaller
meters for the Pines at the time of construction, but that Snyder and Hunt installed
two six-inch meters in order to accommodate the fire hydrants. She further
advised that the current billing system was approved to be effective January 1,
1983; and that an ordinance that has been effective for almost one year could not
be changed.
Supervisor Burton moved for the adoption of the policy
recommendations, and the motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
PETITION OF J. STEPHEN ARTHUR REQ UESTING REZONING FROM
M-2 TO R-4 OF A TRACT CONTAINING 12.25 ACRES AND LOCATED
ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF VIRGINIA SECONDARY ROUTE 612 FOR
CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A MOBILE HOME COURT IN
THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT.
DENIED
Attorney for the petitioner, Michael Smeltzer; Mr. Stephen Arthur;
and Mr. Bob Cole, of Oakwood Mobile Homes, requested rezoning of property
owned by Mr. Bill Branch as described above. An areal photograph and the site
plan were presented, and the Board stated that they all had inspected the site.
Mr. Smeltzer informed the Board that Mr. Arthur has operated mobile home parks
in the Bedford-Lynchburg area and has been trying to find a properly zoned
Roanoke County mobile home park site since 1979. The proffered conditions
attached to the final order were outlined for the park which would potentially
contain 55 rental sites.
Mr. Edward Natt, represented the citizens and informed the Board
that a petition containing 171 names opposing the mobile home park was presented
to the Planning Commission. He also expressed the citizens' desire that this site
be used for industrial development. He pointed out that since there was no water
and sewer system, a mobile home park would have an adverse affect on the water
Cr,
t:d
n
~)
12-13-83
levels and pollution. The railroad tracks would pose a safety problem to residents
of the mobile home park but would be an asset to industrial development.
Mr. White, who circulated the 171-name petition, explained that he
personally went to every home in the immediate area and explained that he did
not get addresses. He asked everyone who signed his petition to stand up.
Superintendent of the Department of Developm ent, Timothy W. Gubala,
told the Board that the basic planning document for water and sewer in this area
was done in 1973, and that this site has been identified as one of the industrial
development sites for Roanoke County. He also stated that there is an available
site zoned R-4 approximately one-half mile north of this property.
Mr. John Peters, of the Engineering Department, explained that Route
612 was one of the sites selected for preliminary engineering based on industrial
development. If industry should come into the area, this road could be put on the
Six-Year Plan for industrial access funding.
Because of the excessive amount of citizen opposition, Supervisor
Minter moved that the petition be denied. The motion carried by the following
roll call vote:
AYES:
Superv isors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
REQUEST OF BOOTH AMERICAN COMPANY D/B/A SALEM CABLE
T.V. FOR AN INCREASE IN CERTAIN SERVICE RATES.
APPROVED
Attorney, Mr. Raymond R. Robrecht, explained that Salem Cable T.V.
was requesting a rate increase for residents of Roanoke County. The original
request was withdrawn, and additional services have been provided since that time.
The rate increase has been approved by the City of Salem. Supervisor Burton
moved the following prepared resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 83-218 APPROVING CERTAIN
INCREASES IN RATES AND SERVICE CHARGES BY
BOOTH AMERICAN COMPANY DOING BUSINESS AS
SALEM CABLE TV
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
-""""'''"'''
12-13-83
:({ ,
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County has previously
entered into a franchise agreement whereby Booth American Company d/b/a Salem
Cable TV provides cable television and related services to a portion of Roanoke
County; and
WHEREAS, Salem Cable TV has requested the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County to grant increases in certain rates and service charges made
by said company; and
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing thereon scheduled for December
13, 1983, was duly advertised as required by the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended,
and said franchise agreement; and
WHEREAS, said public hearing was held on December 13, 1983;
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Roanoke County Board
of Supervisors does approve and authorize the following schedule of rates and
service charges for customers of Booth American Company d/b/a Salem Cable TV,
effective January 1, 1984:
Service
Rate
Basic Service
Additional Outlet Service
Installation (1st outlet)
Installation (additional outlet)
Reconnect
Relocate Outlet
Transfer Service
$ 9.00
2.75
20.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
A YES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
REQUEST OF PAUL D. HOLLYFmLD FOR A SPECIAL EXCEPTION
TO ESTABLISH A CAMPGROUND ON A 30-ACRE TRACT LOCATED
ON THE WEST SIDE OF U. S. RO UTE 221 AND THE EAST SIDE OF
VIRGINIA SECONDARY ROUTE 889 ON BENT MOUNTAIN IN THE
WINDSOR HILS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT.
HELD OVER
Attorney for the petitioner, Mr. Bert Crush, informed the Board that
Mr. Hollyfield wants to convert 30 acres of his property on Bent Mountain into
a family campground. Citizens speaking in objection to the proposed campground
were Mr. Blackwell, Mr. T. Powell, representing Seaboard Foods; Mr. Fred, Best,
Mr. Michael Gordon, Ms. Mary Margaret Copp, Route 1, Box 157, Bent, Mountain,
,-
'f",I
~)
12-13-83
and Mr. Mark Havacheck.
Pursuant to discussion, Supervisor Burton moved to
table this request for thirty days to give Mr. HOllyfield time to submit rules and
regulations for the campground and to give the Sheriff and the Fire and Emergency
Services Coordinator sufficient time to review the proposed campground and submit
their comments and recommendations. The motion carried by the following roll
call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
REQUEST OF HERITAGE MANOR OF ROANOKE PARTNERSHIP FOR
A SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO OPERATE A HOME FOR ADULTS ON
A ONE-ACRE TRACT LOCATED AT 7540 WILLIAMSON ROAD ONCE
KNOWN AS THE CHAPMAN MANOR IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL
DISTRICT.
APPROVED
Mr. Bruce Mayer, attorney for the petitioner explained that the
rezoning had been approved at the November 22, 1983, Board Meeting and requested
that the special exception permit be granted. Supervisor Minter moved that the
permit be granted, and the motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NA YS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
REQUEST OF MR. AND MRS. WILLIAM P. RHODES, JR. FOR A
SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO PLACE A MOBILE HOME ON A 12.28-
ACRE TRACT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF VIRGINIA
SECONDARY ROUTE 749 AND APPROXIMATELY .2 MILE WEST
FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH VIRGINIA SECONDARY ROUTE 618
IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT.
APPROVED
There were no objections, and Chairman Johnson reported that Dr.
Nickens saw no objections. Supervisor Myers moved that the permit be granted.
The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
REQUEST OF CARTER AND MARY VAUGHT FOR A SPECIAL
EXCEPTION TO PLACE A MOBILE HOME ON A ONE-ACRE TRACT
LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF VIRGINIA SECONDARY ROUTE
641 IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT.
APPROVED
~o6
12-13-83
Mr. and Mrs. Vaught were present, and there were no citizeA objections.
Supervisor Myers moved that the permit be granted, and the motion carried by a
unanimous voice vote.
REQUEST OF SAMUEL PAULEY, JR. AND REBECCA PAULEY FOR A SPECIAL EXCEPTION
TO PLACE A MOBILE HOME ON 1.02-ACRE TRACT LOCATED ON LOT 9, SECTION 1
OF THE WILDWOOD ESTATES SUBDIVISION IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT.
APPROVED
Mr. Pauley was present. There were no objections, and Supervisor Myers
moved that the permit be granted. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
PETITION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO CONVEY A CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND
DESCRIBED AS 220 FEET LONG AND 15 FEET WIDE AND ADJOINING THE NORTH SIDE
OF VALLEY FORGE DRIVE AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH BRAMBLETON ROAD TOTALLING
.073 ACRES. TO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION.
APPROVED
There were no public comments, and Supervisor Burton moved that the title
to the referenced section of Valley Forge Drive be conveyed to the Virginia
Department of Highways and Transportation and that a resolution be prepared to
be spread in the Minutes.
RESOLUTION NO. 83-219 AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF A CERTAIN PIECE OF
REAL ESTATE OWNED BY ROANOKE COUNTY SITUATE, LYING, AND BEING IN ROANOKE
COUNTY TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
BEING as shown on Sheet 10 of the plans for Route 221, State Highway Projec
0221-080-103, RW-201, and beginning at the southeastern corner of the inter-
section of Brambleton Avenue (U.S. 221) and Valley Forge Avenue (Secondary
Route 1602), said point being at Lot 6, Block 4, Survey Number 1, Mount Vernon
Heights; thence wibh the northeastern right-of-way line of existing Valley
Forge Avenue,S. 54 551 00" E. 177.60 feet to a point, said point being radiall
y opposite and left of centerline Station 12+19.09 at 24.06 feet from the pro-
posed new centerline of Valley Forge Avenue established by the Virginia
Department of Highways and Transportation and shown on Sheet 10 of Project 0221
080-103, RW-201,C-501 of the Brambleton Avenue roadoimprovements; thence with
four new division lines through the said Lot 6 N. 31 341 20" W. 21.12 feet to
a point, said point being radially opposite and left of centerline Station
12+00 at 36.0 feet from the said new Valley Forge Avenue centerline N. 400 111
30" W. 47.74 feet to a point, said point being radially opposite and left of
centerline Station 11+50 at 52.0 feet from the said new Valley Forge Avenue
centerline;N. 540 00' 14" W. 81.66 feet to a point, said point being radially
opposite and left of centerline Station 10+58.01 (the point of 6urve) at 47.0
feet from the said new Valley Forge Avenue centerline; and N. 2 321 01" E.
23.67 feet to a point, said point being on "the-existing southerly right-of-way
line of Brambleton Avenue and being radially opposite and left of centerline
Station 62+70.89 at 45.14 feet from the office revised centerline of Brambleton
Avenue established by the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation;
thence with the existing southerly right-of-way line of said Brambleton Avenue,
S. 580 001 00" W. 45.34 to the point of beginning and containing 3,248.13 squar
feet or 0.0746 acres, and being part of the same lands acquired by the grantor
from the County School Board of Roanoke County dated March 26, 1982, of record
in Deed Book 1183 at page 773.
be, and the same hereby is, authorized and directed to be conveyed by
Roanoke County to the Commonwealth of Virginia upon all terms, conditions and
267,
12~13-84
provisions of a certain agreement between the County of Roanoke and the
Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation; and
2. That the County Administrator be, and he hereby is, authorized and
directed to taRe all such actions and to execute all such documents as made be
needful and necessary in the premises to consummate the conveyance on the
hereinabove described property, all of which shall be upon form approved by
the County Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Burton and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
AMENDMENT TO SECTION 10-10 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE RELATING TO
HANDICAPPED PARKING.
ADOPTED
County Attorney, James E. Buchholtz, explained that adoption of the
Ordiance would give County law enforcement officials additional authority to
enforce handicapped parking on private property. Supervisor Minter moved for
the adoption of the following prepared ordiance:
ORDIANCE NO. 83-220 AMENDING SECTION 10-10. PARKING REGULATIONS OF
CHAPTER 10. MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
Section 10-10. Parking regulations.
****
(b) Spaces reserved for the handicapped. It shall be unlawful for a vehicle
not displaying a license plate decal or special parking permit issued
under 46.1-104.1, 46.1-149.1 or 46.1-254.2 to be parked in a parking
space reserved for the handicapped on public property or at privately
owned parking areas. Any police officer or deputy sheriff observing a
motor vehicle parked in a violation of this section may issue a summons
for such offense without the necessity of a warrant being obtained by the
owner of such private parking area. Any person convicted of a violation
of this section shall be guilty of a Class 4 misdemeanor and shall be
punished therefor as made and provided by law.
****
This amendment shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
None
Supervisor Nickens
~>,
12-13-83
PETITION OF WENDY'S OF WESTERN VIRGINIA, INC. FOR REZONIN
FROM BUSINESS DISTRICT B-2 TO BUSINESS DISTRICT B-3 A P ARCE
OF LAND CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 1.0816 ACRES LOCATED 0
WILLIAMSON ROAD, ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, IN THE HOLLILN
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT.
APPROVED
Mr. Gilbert Butler, Jr., attorney for the petitioner was present to answe
any questions. There being no opposition, Supervisor Minter moved that the rezonin
be granted.
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED and ORDERED that at this meetin
of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held on the 13th day 0
December, 1983, the said Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance be, and the same is hereb
2 to Business District B-3, which property is described on the attached Schedule
amended so as to reclassify the hereinafter-described property from Business District B
subject to the following conditions:
1. The improvements to be constructed on the subject property sha
be in substantial conformity with the site plan dated October 18, 1983, by Gifford
Vernon, A.I.A., currently on file with the County of Roanoke.
2. The landscaping and plantings on the subject property shall be i
substantial conformity with the landscaping plan by Plantation Nursery dated Novem be
10, 1983, currently on file with the County of Roanoke.
AND IT IS ACCORDINGLY SO RESOLVED AND ORDERED.
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Clerk of th
Board shall forthwith certify a copy of this resolution and order to the Secretary 0
the Planning Commission of Roanoke County, Virginia.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
A YES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NA YS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
PETITION OF JOHN M. OAKEY, INC. AND BUILDERS INVESTMENT GROU
INC. REQUESTING REZONING FROM R-1 TO R-5 AND R-6 OF A TRAC
CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 9.7 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, BEING
PORTION OF A TRACT CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 14.32 ACRE
MORE OR LESS, SITUATED IN THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIA
DISTRICT OF ROANOKE COUNTY, DESIGNATED ON ROANOKE COUNT
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION MAP NO. 76.16-3-1 BEARING TAX BILL N
317282.
APPROVED
\
12-13-83
Realtor, Mr. Len Boone, and contractor, Mr. Jack Loeb, requested pa t
of the land currently zoned R-1 be retained for construction of 14 single-family dwelllin
and part be rezoned to R-5 and R-6 for the construction of 126 townhouse units. M.
Roger Lorden, 4390 Sheldon Drive, S. W., Roanoke, expressed concerns over the traff c
safety on Route 419. Mr. William Estes, of the State Water Control Board, told f
his concerns regarding stress on the interceptor system. Supervisor Burton explain d
that the sewage system was constructed to handle normal usage, and the overlo d
condition only existed during heavy rain because the storm drains were piped into t e
sewage system. Mr. Roy Phelps, from the Cresthill Section, expressed the need for a
buffer provision to be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan to protect homeowne s
from the development along Route 419. Supervisor Burton moved that the rezoni g
request be granted.
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED and ORDERED that at this meeti g
of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held on the 13th day f
December, 1983, the said County Zoning Ordinance be, and the same is hereby amend d
so as to reclassify the property described in said petition so that that portion of t e
subject property designated as Parcel B on the October 17, 1983 plat showing proper y
of John M. Oakey, Inc. by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, P. C. attached hereto e
reclasified from Residential District R-1 to Residential District R-5 and that porti n
of the subject property designated as Parcel C be reclasified from Residential District
1 to Residential District R-6 in order that said property might be more fully d
reasonably used, the said property being located in the County of Roanoke, State f
Virginia, with said zoning being subject to the following conditions:
a. No more than one hundred twenty-six (126) residential dwellin s
shall be constructed on the subject 14.32-acre tract of land.
b. The only means of ingress and egress from the 14.32-acre tract f
land will be via an entranceway and access road from Route 419. There will be 0
other access to the property unless required by governmental authority.
c. The westerly boundary of the property adjacent to Blair Co t
bordering the Geiser Road residences will be buffered with natural landscaping consiti g
of berms and trees.
12-13-83
.C)
{....)J' ,
", '
d. The design theme of the total community to be constructed on the 14.3 -
acre tract of land will be traditional with exterior materials on all structures to e
brick and/or frame.
e.
A homeowners' association will be formed which will have the responsibili y
.~..--._-
of maintaining all roads, parking areas, grounds and exterior of all structures on t e
14.32-acre tract of land.
f. That portion of the 14.32-acre tract of land abutting Castle Rock Ro d
south of Parcel B and Parcel C to be zoned Residential District R-1 shall be convey d
to the homeowners' association as common area, shall not be built upon, and shall rem n
in a natural state.
f. All residences constructed within the Residential District R-1 zon d
property shall have a minimum price of no less than sixty-five thousand dollars ($65,00 ).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Clerk of this Boa d
shall forthwith certify a copy of this resolution and order to the Secretary of t e
Planning Commission of Roanoke County, Virginia, and a copy to Hazelgrove, Dickins
Rea, Smeltzer & Brown, attorneys for the petitioner.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
A YES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
PETITION OF DONALD R. TARTER AND LOIS W. TARTER, HUSBAND A
WIFE, REQUESTING THAT VALLEY ROAD AS SHOWN ON THE REVIS
MAP OF SECTION NO.1, ELLINGTON COURT BE PERMANENT
V ACATED, DISCONTINUED AND CLOSED IN THE VINTON MAGISTERI
DISTRICT.
APPROVED
Attorney for the petitioner, Mr. Michael Smeltzer, was present. The e
being no objections, Supervisor Minter moved for vacation of Valley Road.
FINAL ORDER
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED that at this meeti g
of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held on the 13th day f
December, 1983, that that certain part of Valley Road situate in the County of Roanok ,
Virginia, and more particularly described as follows:
C}
[-...)
12-13-83
Valley Street (50 feet wide) from its intersection with the
northerly side of Mayfield Drive (formerly Gearhart Road)
and also known as Virginia Secondary Highway Route No. 659,
to its intersection with the Northerly lot line of Petitioner's
adjacent lot extended to the Northerly lot line of Lot 1,
Block 1, Revised Map of Section 1, Ellington Court
be, and it hereby is, permanetly vacated, discontinued and closed, and that all righ
and interest of the public in and to the same be, and hereby is, released insofar
the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke is empowered so to do, reservin
however, to the County of Roanoke an easement for sewer lines and water mains an
other public utilities that may now be located in or across said part of Valley Roa
together with the right of ingress and egress for the maintenance of such lines, main
or utilities; such easement or easements to terminate upon the later abandonment of us
or permanent removal from the above described part of Valley Road of any such m unicip
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED and ORDERED that the County Engineer b
installation or utility by the owner thereof.
and he is, directed to mark "permanently vacated" on said part of Valley Road on a
maps and plats on file in his office on which said part of Valley Road is shown, referrin
to the book and page of ordinances and resolutions of the Board of Supervisors of th
County of Roanoke, Virginia, wherein this ordinance shall be spread.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED and ORDERED that the Clerk of this Boar
shall forthwith certify a copy of this Resolution and Order to the Secretary of th
Planning Commission of Roanoke County, Virginia, a copy to Hazlegrove, Dickinso
Rea, Smeltzer & Brown, attorneys for the petitioner, and a copy to the Clerk of th
Circuit Court of the County of Roanoke, V irginia, a certified copy of this ordinanc
for recordation in the deed books of said Clerk's Office, indexing the same in the nam
of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as grantor, and in the name of Donald R. Tarte
and Lois W. Tarter and the names of any other parties in interest who may so reques
as grantees.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
A YES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NA YS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
"'"
12-13-83
2 .
PETITION OF LEWIS J. BOHANNON AND ROBERT C. PUCKETT T
REZONE A PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINING .75 ACRE, MORE OR LESS
LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF WILLIAMSON ROAD, IMMEDIATEL
SOUTH OF BLOCK 2, PLYMOUTH COLONY SUBDIVISION, IN ROANOK
COUNTY, FROM BUSINESS DISTRICT B-3 IN ORDER TO PERMIT TH
OPERATION OF A USED CAR LOT ON THE .75-ACRE PARCEL TO B
USED TOGETHER WITH THE PETITIONERS' EXISTING USED CAR LOT I
THE HO LLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT.
APPROVED
Superintendent for the Department of Development, Timothy W. Gubala
advised the Board that a Special Exception Permit is needed in addition to the rezoning
Attorney for the petitioner, Mr. Michael Ferguson, explained that the Plannin
Commission had imposed a restriction "no additional entrances to be constructed ont
Williamson Road" and that his client is requesting a B-3 zoning without restrictions
Mr. Gubala explained that the Planning Commission has no authority to impose conditions
and that any rezoning conditions must be proffered. The County Attorney advised tha
no conditions had been proffered; however, a condition can be attached to a Specia
Exception Permit by the Board of Supervisors.
Mr. Ferguson informed the Board that the Zoning Administrator, Mr. Claud
Lee, had advised that the Special Exception was not needed since the property wa
being used for the same purpose as the adjoining property. Since the legal advertisemen
was written for rezoning only, Supervisor Minter moved for adoption of the final order
and if a Special Exception is needed, the petitioner can reapply for it.
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED by the Board 0
Supervisors of Roanoke County that pursusant to the provisions of law, the followin
property be reclasified and rezoned from Business District B-2 to Business District B
3, and described as follows:
BEGINING at a point at the southeast corner of Lot 17, Block
2, Map of Plymouth Colony, said point being on the west side
of U. S. Highway Route No. 11 (Williamson Road): thence S.
110 10' 13" E. 150 feet to a point on the north line of a
0.603-acre parcel of land owned by A. T. Williams Oil
Company, Inc.; thence leaving Williamson Road and with the
line of the above property S. 780 49' 47" E. 221.08 feet to
a point; thence N. 110 10' 13" W. 150 feet to a point on the
south line of Lot 16, Block 2, Plymouth Colony; thence with
the southerly line of Block 2, Plymouth Colony N. 780 49'
47" E. 221.08 feet to the place of BEGINNING.
~
<1 '~
~j
12-13-83
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Clerk transmit
certified copy of this Final Order to the County Planner so that the zoning maps 0
Roanoke County may be amended to reflect this rezoning.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
IN RE:
RECESS
At 10 :20 p.m. Chairman Johnson called for a recess.
IN RE:
REPORTS OF OFFICERS, DEP ARTMHNTS, AND COMMITTEES
At 10:35 p.m. the meeting reconvened.
Industrial Development Authority - Superintendent of the Department 0
Development, Timothy W. Gubala, reminded the Board that industrial development bon
issues must come before the Board of Supervisors in order to be finalized. Superviso
M inter moved the following resolutions for Penn/WoIfe Office Building, Landmar
Associates, and Southern States:
RESOLUTION NO. 83-221 APPROVING THE INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPLICATION OF BARRY
WOLFE, D.D.S. AND JOSEPH H. PENN, D.M.D., PARTNERS,
T/ A BARRY WOLFE, D.D.S., AND JOSEPH H. PENN, D.M .0.
FOR THE ISSUANCE OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
REVENUE BONDS
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia (th
"Authority"), has considered the application of Barry Wolfe, D.D.S. and Joseph H. Penn
D.M .0., partners, T / A Barry Wolfe, D.D.S., and Joseph H. Penn, D.M .0., a Virgini
general partnership (the "Purchaser"), at 1011 Second Street, S. W., Roanoke, Virgini
24016, requesting the issuance of the Authority's industrial development revenue bon
in an amount estimated at $400,000 (the "Bond") to assist in the financing of th
Company's acquisition, construction and equipping of an office facility (the "Project"
in Roanoke County, Virginia, and has held a public hearing thereon on December 6, 1983
WHEREAS, Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended
provides that the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the issuer of industrial
~
12-13-83
9
~.".~
,,1 t
development bonds and over the area in which any facility financed with the
proceeds of industrial development bonds is located must approve the issuance of
the bonds; and
WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of Roanoke County,
Virginia (the "County"), the Project is to be located in the County and the Board
of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia (the "Board") constitutes the highest
elected governmental officials of the County; and
WHEREAS, the Authority recommends that the Board approve the issuance
of the Bond; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of
the Bond, subject to the terms to be agreed upon, and a certificate of the public
hearing has been filed wi th the Board.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
1. The Board approves the issuance of the Bond by the Authority for
the benefit of the Purchaser, as required by Section 103(k), to permit the Authority
to assist in the financing of the Project.
2. The approval of the issuance of the Bond, as required by Section
103(k), does not constitute an endorsement to a prospective purchaser of the Bond
of the creditworthiness of the Project or the Purchaser, and, as required by
Section 15.1-1380 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, the Bond shall
provide that neither the County nor the Authority shall be obligated to pay the
Bond or the interest thereon or other costs incident thereto except from the
revenues and monies pledged therefore and neither the faith or credit nor the
taxing power of the Commonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged
thereto.
3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
JJ
') t-'1 "."
/..at ~ ~ )
12-13-83
RESOLUTION NO. 83-222 APPROVING THE INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPLICATION OF
LANDMARKASSOCIATES, A VIRGINIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP, FOR THE ISSUANCE OF INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia
(the "Authority"), has considered the application of Landmark Associates, a Virginia
limited partnership (the "Company"), at 8754 Landmark Road, Richmond, Virginia
23228, requesting the issuance of the Authority's industrial development revenue
bond in an amount estimated at $3,000,000 (the "Bond") to assist in the financing
of the Company's acquisition, construction and equipping of a general office
building facility (the "Project") in Roanoke County, Virginia, and has held a public
hearing thereon on December 6, 1983.
WHEREAS, Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended,
provides that the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the issuer of industrial
development bonds and over the area in which any facility financed with the
proceeds of industrial development bonds is located must approve the issuance of
the bonds; and
WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of Roanoke County,
Virginia (the "County"), the Project is to be located in the County and the Board
of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia (the "Board") constitutes the highest
elected governmental officials of the County; and
WHEREAS, the Authority recommends that the Board approve the issuance
of the Bond; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of
the Bond, subject to the terms to be agreed upon, and a certificate of the public
hearing has been filed with the Board.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
1. The Board approves the issuance of the Bond by the Authority for
the benefit of the Company, as required by Section 103(k), to permit the Authority
to assist in the financing of the Project.
2. The approval of the issuance of the Bond, as required by Section
103(k), does not constitute an endorsement to a prospective purchaser of the Bond
of the creditworthiness of the Project or the Company, and, as required by Section
15.1-1380 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, the Bond shall provide
,
12-13-83
that neither the County nor the A uthority shall be obligated to pay the Bond or
the interest thereon or other costs incident thereto except from the revenues and
monies pledged therefor and neither the faith or credit nor the taxing power of
the Commonwealth, the County, nor the Authority shall be pledged thereto.
3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
RESOLUTION NO. 83-223 APPROVING THE INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPLICATON OF
SOUTHERN STATES CORPORATION FOR THE
ISSUANCE OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE
BO NDS
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia
(the Authority), has considered the application of Southern States Cooperative,
Incorporated (the Company) for the issuance of the Authority's industrial
development revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $4,760,000 (the Refunding
Bonds) to refund an issue of $4,760,000 Industrial Development Revenue Bonds
(Southern States Project), Series of 1982, of the Authority (the Series of 1982); and
WHEREAS, the Series of 1982 Bonds were issued by the Authority to assist
in the financing of the Company's construction and equipping of an animal feed
mill located at 1003 Walnut Street in the Town of Vinton, Roanoke County,
Virginia; and
WHEREAS, the Authority has held a public hearing on the issuance of the
Refunding Bonds on December 6, 1983; and
WHEREAS, the Authority has requested the Board of Supervisors (the Board)
of Roanoke County, Virginia (the County), to approve the issuance of the Refunding
Bonds to comply with Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as
amended; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of
the Refunding Bonds, subject to terms to be agreed upon, a record of the public
hearing and a "fiscal impact statement" with respect to the Project have been
filed with the Board;
2'( :7
12-13-83
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
1. The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, approves the
issuance of the Refunding Bonds by the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke
County, Virginia, for the benefit of Southern States Cooperative, Incorporated, to
the extent required by Section 103(k).
2. The approval of the issuance of the Refunding Bonds, as required by
Section 103(k), does not constitute an endorsement of the Refunding Bonds or the
creditworthiness of the Company, but as required by Section 15.1-1380 of the
Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, the Refunding Bonds shall provide that
neither the County nor the Authority shall be obligated to pay the Refunding
Bonds or the interest thereon or other costs incident thereto except from the
revenues and monies pledged therefore, and neither the faith or credit nor the
taxing power of the Commonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged
thereto.
3.
This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
None
AYES:
NAYS:
County Administrator - Donald R. Flanders explained that VVKR has
been retained to assist the County with a plan for the demolition and reconstruction
of the damaged portion of the roof of the Vinton Library. Mr. Bob Frye, of
VVKR, outlined the damages to the structure and presensted three alternative
solutions for the Board's consideration:
1. Reconstruct the damaged portion of the roof with a minim urn
amount of work and cost using the same type of construction at an estimated
cost $36 per square foot or a total of $257,000.
2. Remove the wood trusses and replace them with steel bar joist
construction utilizing parts of the building that are still in good shape with no
additional interior or exterior cost. This would result in an estimated cost of $43
per square foot or a total of $314,000.
3. Completely demolish and rebuild the structure to the same size
at an estimated cost of $65 per square foot or a total of $470,000.
12-13-83
~"'
)1
(",,,t
8 t
Mr. Flanders told the Board that he, the Library Director - Mr.
George Garretson, and Supervisor Nickens toured the Vinton area seeking alternative
locations for the Vinton Library and decided the present location is the most
suitable site. He recommended Alternative # 2 and also recommended bids be
obtained on heating and ventilating. Mr. Dan Bolt, of VVKR, then described the
fast tracking method used at the Roanoke County Administration Center and
explained how the same type system could be used at the Vinton Library. He
also told the Board that a performance bond would be required from the contractor.
Supervisor Burton moved that a resolution be prepared to be spread in the Minutes:
RESOLUTION NO. 83-224 ACCEPTING A CERTAIN
PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE CERTAIN ARCHITECTURAL
SERVICES TO ROANOKE COUNTY AND AUTHORIZING
THE ARCHITECT TO PROCEED WITH CERTAIN WORK
RELATED TO THE PROJECT
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
as follows:
1. That that certain proposal of VVKR Incorporated to provide certain
architectural services to Roanoke County in and about the repair and reconstruction
of the Vinton Branch Library as more fully set forth in a certain agreement
bearing date of November 22, 1983, on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board
of Supervisors, be, and said proposal hereby is, accepted; and
2. That the architect hereinabove authorized to be engaged shall
immediately proceed to fully develop scope of the work documentation for
reconstruction of the Vinton Branch Library in accordance with Alternative
Reconstruction Proposal # 2, to-wit: Reconstruction of the entire roof structure
same to be born on steel beam joists and otherwise be in accordance with said
Alternative # 2, a copy of which may be found on file in the office of the Clerk
to the Board, and to thereafter proceed to develop a plan for a fast-tracking
reconstruction program; and
3. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to
enter into contractual agreement on behalf of Roanoke County with VVKR
Incorporated upon form approved by the County Attorney.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
i.,)
(:...;
9
12-13-83
Supervisor Burton moved to stop the clock at 10 :55 p.m., and the
motion carried by a voice vote with Supervisor Myers voting NAY.
Comty Attorney - James E. Buchholtz has met with a delegation
who requested that the Board authorize them to work on Raintree Road. Since
Raintree Road had already been dedicated to the public, the Board cannot take
any official action regarding Raintree Road. If the Board did act, the road would
become the Board's responsibility. It is a possibility that Raintree Road could
be taken into the Secondary System as a rural addition, and this is being
investigated.
Mr. Buchholtz then requested adoption of the following resolution
regarding Hickory Hill Drive and Walton Lane. Supervisor Burton moved the
resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 83-225 GUARANTEEING FOR A
PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FROM AND AFTER JANUARY
1, 1984, THE WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS
RELATING TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A STREET TO
BE INCORPORATED IN THE STATE SECONDARY
SYSTEM
WHEREAS, Virginia Central Fuels Incorporated, a Virginia Corporation, obtaine
WHEREAS, Walton Lane and Hickory Hill Drive could not be certified completel
a subdivision performance bond from the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
the purpose of which was to indemnify and save harmless the Commonwealth of Virgini
for a period of one year from January 1, 1983, from all loss, cost, damage, or expense
incurred in the repair of Walton Lane and Hickory Hill Drive, and the drainage facilitie
pertaining to said streets and to persons and property lawfully on such streets, occasione
by defective materials and/or workmanship; and
by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County during the stated period of the
performance bond, caused in part by a misunderstanding between the parties responsible
for the completion of the construction of said streets; and
WHEREAS, all required work has now been completed to Walton Lane and Hickor
Hills Drive permitting the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to certify said street
complete; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors recognizes that to require
Virginia Central Fuels Incorporated to obtain a new street performance bond woul
~)
~
',.. f
12-13-83
place an additional financial burden on Virginia Central Fuels Incorporated; therefore
said Board wishes to substitute this resolution in place of the required street performanc
bond.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County that the condition of this obligation is such that the Roanoke County Board 0
Supervisors shall indemnify and save harmless the Commonwealth of Virginia for a period
of one year, from January 1, 1984, from all loss, cost, damage, or expense incurred in
the repair of Walton Lane and Hickory Hills Drive, and the drainage facilities pertaining
to said streets and to persons and property lawfully on such streets occasioned by
defective materials and/or workmanship, then this obligation to be void; otherwise remain
in full force and effect.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
A YES: Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
Department of Development - Superintendent, Timothy W. Gubala, presented
a report prepared by the Planning and Zoning Division defining jtmk vehicles and time
limits on which they may be left on property. Supervisor Burton moved that this matter
be referred to the Planning Commission for wording and a public hearing to come back
before the Board. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
Department of Public Facilities - Assistant to the Superintendent, Mr. Gary
Huff, reported that the staff recommended the Board appropriate funds to cover the
cost of the current transportation agreement with the Greater Roanoke Transit Company
and funds to cover the County's share (10 %) of the transportation feasibility study.
Supervisor Minter moved the following prepared resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 83-226 REQUESTING FINANCIAL
ASSISTANCE FROM THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION FOR A PUBLIC
TRANSPORTATION FEASIBILITY STUDY IN ROANOKE
COUNTY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
as follows:
1. That the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation has
notified the County of Roanoke that certain funds are available to assist in a
'1 ~~ 1...___
h:" "-, -
12-13-83
public transportation study in Roanoke County in an amount not to exceed $5400,
upon Roanoke County agreeing to fund ten per cent (10 %) of the actual cost of
such study; and
2. That the Board, being of the opinion that such public transportation
feasibility study in Roanoke County should be undertaken, does hereby authorize
and direct the County Administrator to make official request for state aid to
conduct such public transportation feasibility study in Roanoke County not to
exceed the sum of $5400 from the Commonwealth, the County of Roanoke being
authorized and directed to pay the sum of ten percent (10 %) of the actual cost
of such study or such other sum as exceeds the aforesaid $5400, determined to be
the state's maximum share of the cost of such public transportation feasibility
study; and
3. That the General Appropriation Resolution of Roanoke County,
Virginia, adopted June 14, 1983, be, and same hereby is, amended as follows to
become effective December 13, 1983:
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NUMBER
Class:
Fund:
Department:
Object:
Expenditures
General
Public Transportation
Professional Services
Public Information
Purchased services-
transportat ion
03-6-08130-30020
03-6-08130-30071
03-6-08130-30100
$600
700
2700
Department:
Unappropriated Balance
03-6-99999-99999
<4000>
4. That an attested copy of this resolution be forthwith forwarded to the
Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation along with the appropriate
application for such funds.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
A YES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NA YS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
Department of Fiscal Management - Superintendent, John Chambliss,
requested approval of an additional Life Pale 5 for the Roanoke County Jail. This
is a piece of advance life support equipment which will be funded by a new State
grant reimbursement policy. Supervisor Minter moved the following prepared
resol ut ions:
""-
12-13-83
2 ,
RESOLUTION NO. 83-227 ACCEPTING A CERTAIN BID
MADE TO THE CO UNTY OF ROANOKE FOR ADVANCED
LIFE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (LIFE PAK 5) FOR USE IN
THE ROANOKE COUNTY/SALEM JAIL FACILITY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
as follows:
1. That that certain bid of Physio-Control in the amount of $7,186.75,
being the best bid submitted for the purchase of advanced life support equipment
(Life Pak 5) for use in the Roanoke County/Salem Jail Facility, upon all and
singular the terms and conditions of the invitation to bid, the specifications of
the County of Roanoke, the bidder's proposals, and the provisions of this resolution,
be, and the same hereby is ACCEPTED; and
2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to
enter into a contract upon a form approved by the County Attorney for this
purchase; and
3. That all other bids for this purchase are hereby rejected and the
County Clerk is directed to so notify such bidders and express the County's
appreciation for the submission of their bids.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NA YS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
RESOLUTION NO. 83-227.a
On motion by Supervisor Minter, the General Appropriation Resolution
of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 14, 1983, be, and is the same hereby
amended as follows to become effective December 13, 1983:
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NUMBER
Class:
Fund:
Department:
Object:
Expenditures
General
Confinement & Care of Prisoners
Capital Outlay-
State Funds 03-6-03301-70100
$7,187
Class:
Fund:
Object:
Revenues
General
State Share Housing
State Prisoners 03-5-24040-60000
7,187
To allocate money received from the State for housing State prisoners
for the purchase of life support system.
~
c~
9P", ;)
l..d "'./
12-13-83
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
Personnel - Personnel Director, Mr. Keith Cook, requested an
amendment to the Roanoke Comty Health Plan regarding retired employees
eligibility. Supervisor Myers moved the following prepared resolution:
RESOL UTION NO. 83-228 AMENDING THE ROANOKE
COUNTY EMPLOYEES' HEALTH PLAN
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
as follows:
1. That that certain provision contained in the Roanoke County
Employees' Health Care Plan designated as "General - C. - Retired Employees'
Eligibility" which reads and provides as follows:
Retired employees receiving a pension as a result of employment
service with Roanoke County may maintain coverage for themselves
and their dependents by payment of the applicable contributions
directly to the plan for a period of six months or until the retired
employee becomes eligible for Medicare, whichever comes first.
be, and is hereby amended to read and provide as follows:
Retired employees receiving a pension as a result of employment
service with Roanoke County may maintain coverage for themselves
and their dependents by payment of the applicable contributions
directly to the plan.
2. That the hereinabove set forth amendment to the Roanoke County
Employees' Health Care Plan shall be in full force and effect from and after the
adoption of this resolution.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
Comty Administrator - recommended adopting a resolution for a plan
of action for Virginia Association of Counties and the Virginia Municipal League
concerning the telephone rate negotiations with C & P Supervisor Minter moved
the following resolution:
'''''-"
12-13-83
2 8 ,4 ~
......
RESOLUTION NO. 83-229 RELATING TO CERTAIN
POSITIONS OF ROANOKE COUNTY REGARDING
TELEPHONE RATE NEGOTIATIONS BY THE VIRGINIA
M UNICIP AL LEAGUE/VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF
COUNTIES STEERING COMMITTEE WITH C & P
TELEPHONE COMP ANY OF VIRGINIA AND
AUTHORIZING CERT AIN ACTIONS PURSUANT TO SUCH
POSITION
WHEREAS, the rates charged to local governments by C & P Telephone
Company of Virginia are not subject to the jurisdiction of the State Corporation
Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Municipal League/Virginia Association of Counties
Steering Committee has been formed to negotiate fair and equitable telephone
rates on behalf of local governments; and
WHEREAS, C & P Telephone Company of Virginia has declined the Steering
Committee's invitation to enter into good faith negotiations of telephone rates
for local governments; and
WHEREAS, there is pending before the State Corporation Commission a
request for C & P Telephone Company of Virginia to increase its Virginia
jurisdictional rates effective January 1, 1984.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia
that:
1. The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County is opposed to any
proposal for the telephone companies and other public utilities to amend the
Virginia Code provisions which exempt local governments from the schedule of
rates established by the Virginia Sate Corporation Commission for service rendered
to persons, firms an corporations, and it authorizes appropriate officials of this
jurisdiction to express this opposition to mem bers of the Virginia General Assem bly.
2. The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County authorizes the Virginia
Municipal League/Virginia Association of Counties Steering Committee to negotiate
fair and equitable telephone rates on behalf of this County.
3. In the event that a contract providing for fair and equitable rates
for telephone service rendered by Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Company to
this jurisdiction has not been accepted and entered into prior to the imposition of
an increase in telephone service rates by the State Corporation commission now
being considered thereby, the appropriate officials of this jurisdiction are authorized
to continue payment of those rates that are in effect on December 1, 1983.
()
'1 i~1
f-I ...~
~ '\
,,)
12-13-83
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Myers, Johnson
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
The Regional Partnership of Roanoke Valley was organized the first
week in December - Lou Grove, President; Charles Hill, Vice President; Bill
Branch, Secretary; Bill Paxton, Treasurer. Donald R. Flanders serves on the
Executive Committee. H. Bern Ewert, Bill Branch, and Norman Fintel have been
selected as a Screening Committee to investigate possible candidates for the
position of Executive Director, to investigate a site for the location of the
offices, and to prepare a budget draft for the Executive Board's consideration.
Supervisor Burton was designated to serve on a Committee with Mr.
Flanders and Mr. Hubbard to review the proposals for furniture for the new
Courthouse.
A communication was received December 12, 1983, designating
Roanoke County as a drought disaster area. A news release will be prepared
advising that loan applications can be made by eligible persons.
Chairman Johnson and Mr. Flanders met with Mr. Rugaber, of the
Roanoke Times and World News, regarding commemorating the 350th Anniversary
of County Government in the United States in 1984.
An Executive Session was requested following the December 27, 1983
Board Meeting.
IN RE:
APPOINTMENTS
Supervisor Minter moved to reappoint Mr. Norman Eugene Jarrett, of
the Hollins Magisterial District, for another four-year term effective January 2,
1984 to the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals. The motion carried
by a unanimous voice vote.
Supervisor Burton moved to appoint Mrs. Nancy Eddy, of the Windsor
Hills Magisterial District, for a four-year term effective January 1, 1984 to the
Library Board. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
---,
",
12-13-83
9o/:ll
,~{~() .
Supervisor Minter moved to reappoint Mr. Joe Bateman, of the Cave
Spring Magisterial District, for a four-year term effective January, 1984, to the
Roanoke County Planning Commission. Chairman Johnson stated that Supervisor
elect Alan H. Brittle concurs with this reappointment. The motion carried by a
unanimous voice vote.
Since Chairman Johnson will no longer serve on the Board of
Supervisors as of December 31, 1983, she nominated Supervisor Gary J. Minter to
serve her unexpired term as the County Board Representative to the Social Services
(Welfare) Board. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. This four-year
term expires January 22, 1986.
IN RE:
ADJOURNMENT
Supervisor Myers moved to adjourn the meeting at 10:59 p.m., and
the motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
lllal'~