HomeMy WebLinkAbout4/11/1978 - Regular
4-11-78
.
322
Salem-Roanoke County
Salem, Virginia
April 11, 1978
7:00 P.M.
Civic Center
I
The Board of County Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this
day in open session at the Salem-Roanoke County Civic Center in Salem, Virginia,
this being the second Tuesday and the first regular meeting of the month.
Members Present: Chairman R. Wayne Compton, Supervisors Edward C.
Park, Jr. and Lawrence E. Terry.
Absent: Vice-Chairman Robert E. Myers and Supervisor May W. Johnson.
Chairman Compton called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. and recognized
Reverend George H. Orser, Southview United Methodist Church, who offered the
invocation. The Pledge of Allegiance to the flag was given in unison.
IN RE:
APPLICATION OF J. R. STUMP FOR A SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO
PARK A MOBILE HOME ON A 11.3-ACRE TRACT LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF STATE ROUTE 624 (NEWPORT ROAD), ONE MILE
WEST OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH STATE ROUTE 311
I
Mrs. Stump was present at the public hearing. No one spoke in oppositio
to the request.
Supervisor Terry moved that the application of J. R. Stump be approved
subject to the provisions of the County Zoning Ordinance pertaining to mobile
homes, which motion was adopted by the unanimous voice vote of the members present.
NOTE:
Applicant has been granted variance by Board of Zoning Appeals -
there is an existing house on the property.
IN RE:
RENEWAL APPLICATION OF HELEN B. DOYLE FOR A SPECIAL
EXCEPTION TO PARK A MOBILE HOME ON A 6.2-ACRE TRACT
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF STATE ROUTE 311,0.7
MILE WEST OF STATE ROUTE 698
Mrs. Doyle was present at the public hearing. No one spoke in oppositio
I
to the request.
Supervisor Park moved that the renewal application of Helen B. Doyle
be approved beginning April 13, 1978, subject to the provisions of the County
Zoning Ordinance pertaining to mobile homes, which motion was adopted by the
unanimous voice vote of the members present.
J
.
32a,
4- 11- 78
IN RE:
PETITION OF SALCO, LIMITED FOR REZONING FROM R-l TO *
B-1 OF 1.15 ACRES LOCATED ON ROUTE 419, ADJACENT TO *
THE OAK GROVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, WINDSOR HILLS DIS- *
TRICT, IN ORDER TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MEDICAL/ *
DENTAL OFFICE BUILDING *
DENIED
Mr. Edward A. Natt, Attorney, appeared on behalf of the petitioners.
Mr. Natt stated that he and his clients would be willing to continue the public
hearing since only three out of the five members of the Board were present at the
I
meeting. Chairman Compton then asked Mr. Natt if he was requesting continuance.
Mr. Natt responded in the affirmative. Supervisor Terry moved that the petition
be considered at this meeting, which motion was adopted by the unanimous voice
vote of the members present.
At this point, Chairman Compton opened the floor for public comments.
Mr. Natt reminded the Supervisors that the Planning Commission did recommend
approval of the requested rezoning. Mr. Natt then described the site plan, noting
that the surrounding area is zoned B-1 and he cited other offices and businesses
in the vicinity of the site. Mr. Natt further advised that, in his opinion, this
use of the land is not an extension of a zoning classification, but a completion
or addition to that which is already in the area. Mr. Natt stated that a 70' x
lOa' building to house four (4) medical offices is proposed. He further noted
I
that adequate screening from the school property to the rear is provided and
reiterated the predominantly B-1 zoning in the area and the Planning Commission's
favorable recommendation.
Approximately 25 persons were present in opposition to the proposed
rezoning. Mr. Gerard Bijwaard, spokesman for the Sugar Loaf Farms Civic Associa-
tion, raised the question on who has the right to file a rezoning petition. The
County Attorney advised that any person who has an equitable interest in the
property (an option to purchase) may file such a petition. Mr. Bijwaard admitted
that the present appearance of the property leaves something to be desired, but
he also noted that on the County's proposed land use maps this property remains
R-l property. He also raised objections to the increased traffic load which would
result if the rezoning is granted stating that the traffic problem along Route 419
I
is already a difficult situation. Mr. Bijwaard again urged the Supervisors to
place a moritorium on all rezoning requests on Route 419, north of 221 until the
County's new zoning ordinance is completed and contract rezoning becomes effective
July 1, 1978. Mr. Lee Samuelson, representing the Oak Grove PTA Executive Board,
.
4- 11- 78
I
also urged the Supervisors to defer action until after July 1, whereby the
petitioner will be required to follow his site plan as presented. Mr. Samuelson
further advised that he was not opposed to the rezoning if the Supervisors
deferred action as previously requested. Mr. Leon Williams, representing the
Farmingdale Civic League, cited traffic problems along Route 419 (no crossover).
Mr. Williams said he did not see the need for such a facility in the area since
space is available in the Oak Grove Plaza, and medical buildings and facilities
around Lewis-Gale Hospital are available. Mr. Williams also cited drug problems
associated with medical offices, which are potential sources for robbery.
Mr. Williams also disputed Mr. Natt's suggesting that the property is surrounded
by B-1, stating that he feels it is surrounded by R-l and that the County's master
plan shows this area as a R-l zoning classification.
At this point, Mr. Natt responded to several of the allegations made
by the opposition. He noted that the long-range plan is a plan only and has
not yet been adopted by the Board, he reiterated the petitioner's desire to
commit himself to the site plan as presented, and noted that there is a pharmacy
and a doctor1s office in 'the Oak Grove Plaza, which have caused no drug problems.
According to Mr. Natt, there is very little or no citizen opposition in the
immediate area of the property in question. He stated that most of the opposition
live at least one-half mile from the site.
This concluded the public hearing, and Supervisor Terry moved that the
petition of SALCO, Limited be denied. At this point, Chairman Compton asked if
the petitioners would be willing to continue the public hearing until after
July 1, when contract zoning becomes law. Mr. Natt answered in the affirmative
and requested general continuance of the public hearing. Approximately 15
persons still expressed opposition to the proposed rezoning.
There being no further comments, the rezoning was denied by the follow-
ing recorded vote:
I
AYES: Mr. Park, Mr. Terry
I
NAYS: Mr. Compton
ABSENT: Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Myers
-
4- 11- 78
IN RE:
PETITION OF EMORY GLENN BOWMAN FOR REZONING FROM B-2
TO R-3 OF LOTS 2, 3, 4, AND 5, BLOCK 11 OF NORTH HILLS,
HOLLINS DISTRICT, SO THAT A DUPLEX AND/OR MULTI-FAMILY
DWELLINGS MAY BE CONSTRUCTED THEREON
The first of tk. Bowman"s two petitions scheduled for this meeting
was presented to the Board by Mr. Edward A. Natt, Attorney, who advised that
there was no opposition present at the Planning Commission meeting on this
I
rezoning. Mr. Natt also advised that the petitioner originally requested to
rezone from B-2 to B-1, but has agreed to concur with the recommendation of
the Planning Commission and request a R-3 zoning reclassification of said
property.
At this point, Chairman Compton opened the floor for public comments.
Several residents of the North Hills area spoke in opposition to the request.
One of the residents, Mr. T. C. Fisher stated that he was not even aware of this
request of Mr. Bowman1s. Mr. Natt advised, with the County Planner's agreement,
that this petition along with another petition filed by Mr. Bowman were both
heard at the Planning Commission's meeting on March 21, 1978. Mr. Natt explained
t.1r. Bowman's desire to construct duplexes on lots located behind the Kroger Store
near the intersection of Williamson Road and Peters Creek Road. He also pointed I
out that the property is presently zoned B-2 and if the rezoning to R-3 is not
granted, the petitioner may construct any building permitted in a B-2 zoning dis-
trict; such as a restaurant, office or medical building, etc. Mr. Natt further
advised that the R-3 zoning is a valid and good use of the property. Comments
by several area residents indicated considerable misunderstanding and confusion
as to the nature and location of this proposal when it was before the Planning
Commission.
This concluded the public hearing and on the motion of Supervisor
Terry and the unanimous voice vote of the members present, the petition was
referred back to the Planning Commission to be readvertised for another public
hearing, the County to assume all costs incurred.
I
4-11-78
. -
326
c
IN RE:
PETITION OF EMORY GLENN BOWMM~ FOR REZONING *
FROM R-l TO R-2 OF LOT 5, BLOCK 2, and LOT *
15, BLOCK 3, OF NORTH HILLS, HOLLINS DISTRICT,* i DENIED
SO THAT DUPLEX DWELLINGS MAY BE CONSTRUCTED *
THEREON. *
I
The second request of E. Glenn Bowman to construct duplexes on
Elwood Street in North Hills was also presented to the Board by Mr. Edward
A. Natt, Attorney. Mr. Natt described the site plan and stated that there is
an existing duplex to the rear of one of the lots. He submitted photos of
the proposed duplexes, noting that there is R-3 zoning a block from the
property. Mr. Natt stated that he disagreed with the Planning Commission,
which recommended denial of the request based on spot zoning. Approximately
25 persons, represented by attorney Evans Jessee, appearedifr opposition to
the proposed rezoning. Mr. Jessee advised that a petition containing the
names of 64 area residents had been filed with the Planning Commission. Mr.
Jessee stated that the houses in North Hills range from fifty to 100thousand
dollars in value and explained that dupleses, which are rentals, would
I
be undesirable in an area where people own their homes. Mr. Charles Wilkerson
6712 Greenway Drive, stated that the homes in the area are custom built for
single families -- a home to retire in. Mr. T. C. Fisher, area resident,
stated that he wished to see North Hills remain a single-family residential
neighborhood and that construction of duplexes would distrub the integrity
of the neighborhood.
This concluded the public hearing, and Supervisor Terry moved that
the Board concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission and deny
the rezoning, which motion was adopted by the following recorded vote:
':l - ';
AYES:
Mr. Park, Mr. Terry, Mr. Compton
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Hyers
I
IN RE:
RESOLUTION NO. 2023 ADOPTING A 1995 TRANSPORTATION
PLAN FOR THE ROANOKE VALLEY WITH CERTAIN __,~
AHENDMENTS:
WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation has
prepared a document entitled The 1995 Transportation Plan for the Roanoke
Valley; and
WHEREAS, local adoption of this document is requested by said agency
of local governing bodies; and
4-11-78
aZ7
WHEREAS, a public hearing, pursuant to Section 15.1-431 of the Code
of Virginia, has been held and consideration given by the Roanoke County
Planning Commission to this document; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission has recommended to
I
the Board of County Supervisors of Roanoke County that the document entitled
The 1995 Transportation Plan for the Roanoke Valley be adopted by said Board
with the hereinafter-described amendments.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Supervisors of
Roanoke County that The 1995 Transportation Plan for the Roanoke Valley be
adopted with the following amendments:
1. That said document and its maps shall reflect equal consideratioI
of the following amendments:
a. the establishment of an outer loop connecting the proposed
South Salem Circumferential with U. S. Route 220 as shown
on Roanoke County's Year 2000 Major Thoroughfare Plan:
b. the widening to six lanes of portions of Virginia Route 419
in Southwest Roanoke County.
extending from Virginia Route 24 to U. S. Route 220, shown on
I
2.
That the circumferential route in Southeast Roanoke County
the map contained in the Virginia Department of Highways and
Transportation document, be included also in the tabular listing
on page 40 of the said document and be shown as programmed for
Construction Stage Ultimate.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of this Board transmit a
certified copy of this resolution to the Virginia Department of Highways and
Transportation.
Mr. Robert W. Hooper, County Planner, advised the Supervisors that to
date the Plan has been adopted by the City of Roanoke, City of Salem, and Town
of Vinton. Mr. Hooper then introduced Mr. William C. Jeffrey of the State
consider methods for relieving traffic congestion on Route 419 (either six-
I
Highway Department who advised that the Highway Department is willing to
laning it or using an outer loop) and that a public hearing will subsequently
be held by the Highway Department before any decision is reached.
At this point, Chairman Compton opened the floor for public comments.
Mr. Leon Williams, residing at 5556 McVitty Road, S. W., requested that the
Highway Department use the outer loop method and that six-laning 419 be an
4-iJ-78
3)~~2' :. 8
. ". ....u
alternative to the outer loop. Mr. Gerard Bijwaard, resident of the Sugar
Loaf Farms area, also supported the outer loop proposal instead of six-laning
419. Mr. Jeffrey assured that both methods will be considered equally.
This concluded the public hearing, and the foregoing resolution
was adopted on motion of Supervisor Park and the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Mr. Park, Mr. Terry, Mr. Compton
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Myers
IN RE:
PROCLAMATION - "ROANOKE VALLEY ESTATE PLANNING DAYS"
Pursuant to a request from Mr. William R. Davis, Trust Officer,
United Virginia Bank, Chairman Compton proclaimed May 9 - 11 as "Roanoke
Valley Estate Planning Days." A full copy of the proclamation is filed with
the minutes of this meeting.
IN RE:
RAFFLE PERMIT - NORTH CROSS SCHOOL
Mr. John Tucker, Jr., Headmaster, North Cross School, was present
at the meeting.
Supervisor Terry moved that the application of North Cross School
for a raffle permit be approved effective this date for a period of one year,
which motion was adopted by the unanimous voice vote of the members present.
IN RE:
PRESENTATION OF 1978-79 BUDGET
County Executive Clark presented to the Board a recommended budget
for the next fiscal year and offered brief remarks concerning certain of the
principal features thereof. A full copy of the County Executive's budget
message is filed with the minutes of this meeting.
IN RE:
SCHOOL BOARD BUDGET
Supervisor Terry moved that the School Board budget be referred
back to the School Board for reconsideration, with particular attention to
Superintendent Arnold R. Burton's recommendations that a ceiling be placed
on annual raises for the next fiscal year, which motion was adopted by the
following recorded vote:
4-11-78
8:.2,,9
.. - -..-- .
AYES:
Mr. Terry, Mr. Compton
NAYS:
Mr. Park
ABSENT:
Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Myers
The Supervisors also scheduled their first budget study session to
I
be held next Tuesday, April 18 in Room "c" of the Salem-Roanoke County Civic
Center, beginning at 10:00 a.m.
IN RE:
INFORMATION ITEMS
The County Executive's reports regarding Ceta Program and Refuse ColI
ection were for information of the Supervisors and are filed with the minutes
of this meeting.
IN RE:
REFERRALS TO PLANNING COMMISSION
In a report to the Board, the County Executive advised that the
following petition for rezoning had been referred to the Planning Commission
since the Supervisors' meeting on March 14, 1978:
Petition of James H. McNabb for rezoning from B-3 to B-2 of
a lot formerly owned by the Shell Oil Company and located
at the southeast corner of Colonial Avenue and Thompsons Lane
(3622 Colonial Avenue, S. W.) so this property may be used for
construction of a retail decorating shop which will sell paint,
wallpaper, floor coverings, etc.
I
IN RE:
EXEMPTION OF COUNTY MOTOR VEHICLE FEES
FOR DISABLED VETERANS
In a report to the Board, County Attorney Foster advised that
effective July 1, 1978, State law will provide an exemption for certain dis-
abled veterans from the County motor vehicle license fee. Mr. Foster also
advised the Supervisors that the notice of intention adopted by the Board at
its previous;;meeting proposing to exempt these veterans will be duplicating wha
will already become State law in July, and the Board may if it wishes to do
Supervisor Park offered a Motion to Rescind the action taken by the
I
so adopt a Motion to Rescind, which will undo the action taken on March 28.
Board on March 28, 1978, proposing to amend the County Code by allowing
certain disabled veterans to be exempted from paying County motor vehicle fees,
which motion was adopted by the unanimous voice vote of the members present.
4-11-78
~' !l'~ tf', '
.
IN RE:
RESOLUTION NO. 2024 APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF FIVE
(5) RECONDITIONED VOTING MACHINES QUALIFYING AS A
SINGLE SOURCE PURCHASE FOR THE COUNTY ELECTORAL BOARD.
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Electoral Board has in a letter dated
I
March 23, 1978, to the Board of County Supervisors of Roanoke County,
reported that the County will require additional voting machines ,to meet
Virginia Election Law requirements; and
WHEREAS, in said letter the County Electoral Board recommended to
this Board that such voting machines could be purchased at a total savings
to the County of $3,000 if purchase were made of reconditioned voting
machines, in which recommendation this Board concurs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Supervisors of
Roanoke County that the purchase of five (5) reconditioned voting machines
for the sum of $8,000, which carry a five-year warranty, by the Roanoke County
Electoral Board from Virginia Election Services of Richmond, Virginia, be, and
the same is hereby, approved as a single-source purchase.
On motion of Supervisor Terry and adopted by the following recorded
I
vote:
AYES:
Mr. Park, Mr. Terry, Mr. Compton
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Myers
IN RE:
APPROPRIATION RESOLUTION NO. 2025 APPROPRIATING
THE SUM OF $8,000 FROM THE COUNTY'S UNAPPROPRIATED
BALANCE TO THE ACCOUNT (ELECTIONS) FOR THE PURCHASE
OF FIVE (5) RECONDITIONED VOTING MACHINES.
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NUMBER
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
Class:
Fund:
Department:
Object:
Expenditures
General Operating
Elections
Voting Equipment
60313A-499
$8,000
I
Department:
Object:
Contingent Balance
Unappropriated Balance
60399A-999
($8,000)
Adopted on motion of Supervisor Terry and the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Mr. Park, Mr. Terry, Mr. Compton
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Myers
4-11-80
331.
IN RE:
RESOLUTION NO. 2026 RECOGNIZING LOUIS S. WALDROP FOR HIS
OUTSTANDING DEDICATION AND SERVICE TO ROANOKE COUNTY
AS A MEMBER OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY
BOARD OF DIRECTORS: AND THIS BOARD DOES FURTHER CONGRATULATE
MR. WALDROP UPON THE EXEMPLARY MANNER IN WHICH HE ACCOMPLISHED
THE DUTIES IMPOSED UPON HIM AS CHAIRMAN OF SAID BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
I
A full copy of Resolution No. 2026 is filed with
the minutes of this meeting
On motion of Supervisor Terry and adopted by the unanimous voice
vote of the members present.
IN RE:
RESOLUTION NO. 2027 INCORPORATING CERTAIN RECOMMENDATIONS
OF A COMMITTEE OF SUPERVISORS AND THE COUNTY EMPLOYEES'
COMMITTEE INTO ROANOKE COUNTY'S PERSONNEL POLICIES AND
PROCEDURES REGARDING WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION BENEFITS.
WHEREAS, an informal committee composed of Roanoke County employees
was administratively appointed during 1975 and given the task of reviewing
the County's personnel policies and procedures and making recommendations
for changes in such; and
WHEREAS, said committee, along with a committee of Supervisors, has
reported to the county Executive and has recommended certain revisions and
I
changes in the County's personnel policies and procedures and the County
Executive has, in his memorandum to the County Attorney dated April 6, 1978,
reported said committees' recommendation that the policy changes be implemented
in which recommendation the Board concurs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Supervisors of
Roanoke County that the following special form of leav for on-the-job injury
available to permanent, full-time employees of the County be, and the same
is hereby, adopted as the personnel policies and procedures regarding workman's
compensation benefits:
1.
For the first seven (7) calendar days, employee will still be
expected to use his accrued sick leave if he desires to continue
to receive full pay. Special exception could be granted by the
Board of County Supervisors, upon recommendation of the department
head, for new employees who had not yet accrued sufficient sick
leave in the event of a serious on-th-job injury.
I
2. After the first seven (7) calendar days and for up to the next
ninety (90) work days, the employee could receive full pay charged
against this special leave for on-th-job injury upon recommendation
by the department head and approval of the County Executive.
3. Upon recommendation of both the department head and the County
Executive, the Board of County Supervisors could grant up to an
additional sixty (60) work days in special instances.
4. During the period of time that the employee continued to receive
full pay while on this special form of on-th-job injury leave,
4-11-80
3'3~2'
.
,
he must sign over any workman's compensation checks to the County.
5. The County reserves the right to designate a particular physician
that an employee must visit for examination to verify the
extent of injury.
III On motion of Supervisor Park and adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Mr. Park, Mr. Terry, Mr. Compton
NAYS: None
ABSENT:
Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Myers
IN RE:
RESOLUTION NO. 2028 ESTABLISHING A POLICY OF
SUPPLEMENTING THE OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT
OF THE COUNTY-WIDE WATER SYSTEM THROUGH THE
USE OF THE GENERAL TAX REVENUE OF THE COUNTY
IN SPECIAL INSTANCES.
WHEREAS, Roanoke County has, after voter approval, heretofore sold
general obligation bonds secured by the general tax base of, the County,
for the purpose of financing the cost of water facilities to be a part of
the County-wide water supply and distribution system including the acquisition
I
of water facilities owned by the Roanoke County Public Service Authority; and
WHEREAS, although the bonds are general obligation bonds, by officia
statement of the County of Roanoke dated February IS, 1977, it was anticipated
that said bonds will be paid from the revenues of said County-wide water
system; and
WHEREAS, while it remains the intent of the Board of County Supervis s
that the current practice of fixing, nharging and collecting such rates, fees
and other charges for the use of and the services furnished by the water
system so as to produce net revenue sufficient to pay principal of and
interest on all water bonds be maintained while the bonds are outstanding; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Supervisors of Roanoke County is of the
opinion that in special instances only the operationg and development of the
I
County water system may require financial supplementation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Supervisors
of Roanoke County that a policy be, and the same is hereby, established for
supplementing the operation and development of the County water system
through the use of the general tax revenue of the County to the extent
necessary and when available in special instances requiring said supplementat ~n
as determined by the Board of County Supervisors of Roanoke County.
4-11-78
s.~ 3 ~3:~.
On motion of Supervisor Park and adopted by the unanimous voice vote
of the members present.
IN RE:
STUDY COMMITTEE - UPGRADING FINANCE DEPARTMENT
I
Supervisor Park moved that Mr. Tom Farrell, Director of Data Pro-
cessing for the School Board, be included on the study committee appointed by
the Supervisors on March 28, to meet with Daniel A. Robinson and Associates,
the County's independent auditors, and discuss with Mr. Robinson his ideas for
the needs and continued development of the County's Department of Finance,
which motion was defeated by the followiqg~ recorded vote,:
AYES:
Mr. Park
NAYS:
Mr. Terry, Mr. Compton
ABSENT:
Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Myers
NOTE:
This matter was discussed later in the meeting, at which time,
Mr. Farrell was appointed. SEE BELOW
IN RE:
REQUEST OF FORT LEWIS VILLAGE FOR WAIVER OF COUNTY WATER ORDINANCE
Mr. T. A. Carter was present in regard to the request for waiver of
I
the County's water ordinance for Fort Lewis Village which, at the request of
Mr. Paul B. Matthews, had been continued for the March 28th Board meeting.
The Supervisors felt that additional information was necessary and
advised Mr. Carter that they would attend the PSA meeting on Thursday,
April 27, at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of discussing Mr. Carter's request for
waiver of the County water ordinance to allow the City of Salem to serve
Fort Lewis Village.
IN RE:
STUDY COMMITTEE - UPGRADING FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Supervisor Terry moved to reconsider the appointment of Mr. Tom
Farrell to the study committee appointed to discuss the needs of the County's
Department of Finance with Mr. Dan Robinson, the County's auditor, which
I
motion was approved by the unanimous voice vote of the members present.
Supervisor Park moved that Mr. Farrell be appointed to said
committee, which motion was adopted by the unanimous voice vote of the
members present.
4-11-78
3,., '3F:AJ~
" t~I"
IN RE:
EXECUTIVE SESSION - REAL ESTATE MATTERS
At 9:55 p.m.. Supervisor Park moved that the Board go into
Executive Session to discuss real estate matters. which motion was adopted
I
by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Mr. Park, Mr. Terry. Mr. Compton
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Mrs. Johnson. Mr. Myers
At 10:43 p.m., the Supervisors returned to the meeting room and
on the motion of Supervisor Terry and the unanimous voice vote of the members
present. the Board reconvened in open session.
IN RE:
ADJOURNMENT
This concluded the business before the Board at this time. and on
the motion of Supervisor Park and the unanimous voice vote of the members
present. the meeting was adjourned at 10:44 p.m.
I
CHAIRMAN
I