HomeMy WebLinkAbout5/27/1975 - Regular
5-27-75
Salem-Roanoke Valley Civic Center
Salem, Virginia
May 27, 1 975
7:00 P.M.
I
The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County met this day at the Salem-
Roanoke Valley Civic Center in Salem, Virginia, being the fourth Tuesday and the
second regular meeting of the month.
Members Present:
Chairman Richard C. Flora, Vice-Chairman John G.
C. Lawrence Dodson, R. E. Hilton, Jr. and May Winn Johnson.
Chairman Flora called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. anqrecognized
Reverend James V. Defore, Melrose Baptist Church, who offered the invocation.
Pledge of Allegiance to the flag was given in unison, led by Chairman Flora.
On the motion of Supervisor Seibel and the unanimous voice vote of the
Board, the minutes of the special meeting of May 9 and the regular meeting of
May 13, 1975, were approved as spread.
I
IN RE:
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE QUESTION OF A SOIL EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL ORDINANCE
A joint public hearing of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and
Roanoke County Planning Commission was this date held on the question of a Soil
Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance.
Following is a list of persons who spoke at the hearing:
Mr. Russell
Rabby, Executive Director, Citizens' Environmental Council, made a presentation,
including slides, on behalf of the ordinance; Mr. John P. Cone, Jr.,Roanoke
Federation of Civic Leagues, appeared on behalf of the ordinance; Mr. Elbert
representing the Roanoke Valley Home Builders Association, requested certain
revisions to the ordinance; Mr. Raymond R. Robrecht, Roanoke County Delegate,
suggested Board appoint a sub-committee to study the proposed ordinance; Mr. Sam
I
Lionberger, Vice-President, Virginia Association of General Contractors commented
~:\.
~
271
Seibel~
!
I
I
~
I
I
The i
I
I
!
i
i
I
i
I
i
!
!
I
I
j
I
I
!
I
!
I
I
I
County I
Waldro~,
I
I
on cost increase, time delays and staff increase that will come about due to the
ordinance; Mr. Buford T. Lumsden concurred with Mr. Lionberger comments and I
requested Board to defer action on proposed ordinance; Mr. Leo Painter, a member of
the Blue Ridge Soil and Water Conservation District, appeared in favor of the
""'.---
....- "
~~ - "';'
5-27-75
"27~2
ordinance; Mr. Curtis Steel, suggested Board defer action and study the ordinance
in more detail; Mr. Paul Hollyfield, a member of the Blue Ridge Soil and Water
Conservation District requested Board to act slowly in adopting the ordinance.
IN RE:
COMMITTEE TO STUDY PROPOSED SOIL EROSION
AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ORDINANCE
I
Supervisor Seibel moved that the public hearing on the question of a
Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance be continued to the June 10, 1975
meeting of the Board and further that an Ad Hoc Committee be appointed to study
and investigate the proposed ordinance and report back to the Board at the June 10
meeting. The following persons were appointed to serve on the Committee:
Sam Lionberger, Joe Thomas, Russell Rabby, John P. Cone, Jr., Supervisor C. Lawrenc
Dodson, David Updike, Paul Hollyfield and Burrell S. Whitlow. Ex-Officio Members:
Board Chairman, County Administrator, County Engineer, County Attorney, Raymond R.
Robrecht and C. Richard Cranwell.
The motion was adopted by the unanimous voice vote of the Board.
IN RE:
PUBLIC HEARING ON INTERIM LAND USE PLANS FOR ROANOKE
COUNTY TO BE USED IN DEVELOPMENT OF COUNTY'S MASTER PLAN
I
A joint public hearing of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and
Roanoke County Planning Commission was this date held on the Interim Land Use
Plans for Roanoke County to be used in the development of the County's Master Plan.
Following is a list of persons who spoke at the hearing: Mr. Horace
Fralin, member, Roanoke Valley Home Builders Association, stated that he would
like some input into the Land Use Plans; Mr. Maury Strauss, Developer and
Contractor, stated that he was in favor of the basic concept of the Interim Land
Use Plans; Mr. George Moore, Secretary of the Board of Trustees at Hollins College,
requested change in zoning of a portion of land now zoned agricultural to
industrial.
IN RE:
INTERIM LAND USE PLANS
Supervisor Hilton moved that the Board concur with the recommendation
of the Planning Commission and continue the public hearing on the Interim Land Use
Plans to the July 22, 1975 meeting of the Board and that said plans be referred
back to the County's Planning Consultants for updating, taking into consideration
I
the recent annexation decision.
The motion was adopted by the unanimous voice vote of the Board.
5-27-75
~..
27.3
At 9:20 p.m., on the motion of Supervisor Seibel and the unanimous voice
vote of the members, the Board went into Executive Session to discuss a personnel
matter.
At 10:15 p.m., the Supervisors returned to the Civic Center and on the
I
motion of Supervisor Dodson and the unanimous voice vote 6f the members present,
the Board reconvened in open session.
IN RE:
ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1252 AMENDING CHAPTER
19 BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW SECTION NUMBERED 19-9
AND ENTITLED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR AGRICULTURAL,
HORTICULTURAL, FOREST OR OPEN SPACE REAL ESTATE
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors deems certain amendments to the
Roanoke County Code to be necessary in the best interests of the health, safety
and general welfare of the citizens of Roanoke County; and
WHEREAS, a notice of intention to amend the Roanoke County Code as
proposed, and public hearing thereon, have been advertised and posted in accordance
with law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
I
County, that the Roanoke County Code be amended as follows:
Chapter 19. Taxation be amended by the addition of a
new section numbered 19-9 and entitled Special
assessment for agricultural, horticultural, forest or
open space real estate as follows:
,Sec. 19-9.
Special assessments for agricultural, horticultural, forest or open
space real estate.
A. The record owner of any real estate meeting the following criteria, may, on
or before November one of any year, apply to the commissioner of the revenue for
the classification, assessment and taxation of such property for the next
succeeding tax year on the basis of its use, under the procedures hereinafter set
out. The criteria are as follows:
1. The real estate shall fall within one of the classifications hereinafter
established and defined:
a. "Real estate devoted to agricultural use" shall mean real estate
when devoted to the bona fide production for sale of plants and animals useful to
man under uniform standards prescribed by the Commissioner of Agriculture and
Commerce or when devoted to and meeting the requirements and qualifications for
payments or other compensation pursuant to a soil conservation program under an
agreement with an agency of the Federal government.
I
b. "Real estate devoted to horticultural use" shall mean real estate
when devoted to the bona fide production for sale of fruits of all kinds, including
grapes, nuts and berries; vegetables; nursey and floral products under uniform
standards prescribed by the Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce; or when
devoted to and meeting the requirements and qualifications for payments or other
compensation pursuant to a soil conservation program under an agreement with an
agency of the Federal government.
c. "Real estate devoted to forest use" shall mean land, when devoted to
tree growth in such quantity and so spacen and maintained as to constitute a forest
area under standards prescribed by the Director of the Department of Conservation
and Economic Development pursuant to the authority set out in the Code of Virginia,
as amended, including the standing timber and trees thereon.
....~
'2'7.4
I
5-27-75
d. "Rea1 estate devoted to open space use" shall mean real estate when
so used as to be provided or preserved for park or recreational purposes, conserva-
tion of land or other natural resources, f100dways, historic or scenic purposes or
assisting in the shaping of the character, direction, and timing of community
development under uniform standards prescribed by the Director of the Commission of
Outdoor Recreation pursuant to the authority set out in the Code of Virginia, as
amended, and this section.
2. The real estate shall further consist of a mlnlmum of five acres if devote
to agricultural or horticultural use, a minimum of twenty acres if devoted to
forest use and a minimum of five acres if devoted to open space use.
I
B. The procedure to be followed in making the determination shall be as
fo 11 ows:
1. In valuing real estate for purposes of taxation pursuant to this section,
the commissioner of the revenue or duly appointed assessor shall consider only
those indicia of value which such real estate has for agricultural, horticultural,
forest or open space use and real estate taxes shall be extended upon the value so
determined. In addition to use of his personal knowledge, judgment and experience
as to the value of real estate in agricultural, horticultural, forest or open spac
use, he shall, in arriving at the value of such land, consider available evidence
of agricultural, horticultural, forest or open space capability and the recommenda
tions of value of such real estate as made by the State Land Evaluation Advisory
Committee.
2. In determining the total area of real estate actively devoted to
agricultural, horticultural, forest or open space use there shall be included the
area of all real estate under barns, sheds, silos, cribs, greenhouses, public
recreation facilities and like structures, lakes, dams, ponds, streams, irrigation
ditches and like facilities; but real estate under, and such additional real estat
as may be actually used in connection with the farmhouse or home or any other
structure not related to such special use shall be excluded in determining such
tota 1 area.
3. All structures which are located on real estate in agricultural,
horticultural, forest or open space use and the farmhouse or home or any other
structure not related to such special use and the real estate on which the farm-
house or home or such other structure is located, together with the additional
real estate used in connection therewith, shall be valued, assessed and taxed by
the same standards, methods and procedures as other taxable structures and other
real estate in the county.
I
4. In addition, such real estate in agricultural, horticultural, forest or
open space use shall be evaluated on the basis of fair market value as applied to
other real estate in the county, and land book records shall be maintained to show
both the use value and the fair market value of such real estate.
B. Such application shall be on forms provided by the State Department of
Taxation and supplied by the commissioner of the revenue and shall include such
additional schedules, photographs, and drawings as may be required by the
commissioner of the revenue. An individual who is the owner of an undivided
interest in a parcel may apply on behalf of himself and the other owners of such
parcel upon submitting an affidavit that such other owners are minors or cannot be
located. An application shall be submitted whenever the use or acreage of such
land previously approved changes; provided, however, that such property owner must
revalidate annually with the commissioner of the revenue any applications previous y
approved. An application fee of ten dollars ($10.00) per parcel plus ten cents
(10~) per acre or portion thereof contained in such parcel shall accompany each
application. A separate application shall be filed for each parcel on the land
boo k.
I
C. Upon receipt of any application, the commissioner of the revenue shall
determine whether the subject property meets the criteria for taxation hereunder.
If the commissioner of the revenue determines that the subject property does meet
such criteria, he shall determine the value of such property for its qualifying
use, as well as its fair market value.
~
5-27-75
.t"'
27"5
I
In determining whether the subject property meets the criteria for "agricultural
use" or'horticultural use" the commissioner of the revenue may request an opinion
from the Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce; in determining whether the
subject property meets the criteria for "forest use" he may request an opinion from
the Director of the Department of Conservation and Economic Development; and in
determining whether the subject property meets the criteria for "open space use" he
may request an opinion from the Director of the Commission of Outdoor Recreation. ,
Upon the refusal of the Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce, the Director of i
the Commission of Outdoor Recreation to issue an opinion, or in the event of an I
unfavorable opinion which does not comport with standards set forth by the respec- .
tive director, the party aggrieved may seek relief from any court of record whereinl
the real estate in question is located. If the court finds in favor of the I
aggrieved party, it may issue an Order which shall serve in lieu of an opinion for I
the purposes of this section.
I
I
E. There is hereby imposed a roll-back tax, and interest thereon, in an amount, j
if any, by which the tax paid or payable on the basis of the valuation, assessment I
and taxation under this section were exceeded by the taxes that would have been
paid or payable on the basis of the valuation, assessment or taxation of other I
real estate in the county in the year of the change and in each of the five years .
immediately preceding the year of the change, plus simple interest on such roll-
back taxes at the rate of six percentum per annum. If in the tax year in which thel
change of use occurs, the real estate was not valued, assessed and taxed under this
section, the real estate shall be subject to roll-back taxes for such of the five
years immediately preceding in which the real estate was valued, assessed and taxed
under this section.
D. The use value and fair market value of any qualifying property shall be
placed on the land book before delivery to the treasurer and the tax for the next
succeeding tax year shall be extended from the use value.
I
In determining the roll-back taxes chargeable on real estate which has changed in
use, the treasurer shall extend the real estate tax rates for the current and next
preceding five years, or such lessor number of years as the property may have been I
taxed on its use value, upon the difference between the value determined under Ii
sub-section B-4 and the use value determined under sub-section B-1 for each such
year. I
~
Liability to the roll-back taxes shall attach when a change in use occurs but notl,1
when a change in ownership of the title takes place if the new owner continues the I
real estate in the use for which it is classified under the conditions prescribed !
in this section. I
i
I
F. The owner of any real estate liable for roll-back taxes shall, within sixty
days following a change in use, report such change to the commissioner of the
revenue on such forms as may be prescribed. The commissioner shall forthwith
determine and assess the roll-back tax, which shall be paid to the treasurer within
thirty days of assessment. On failure to report within sixty days following such l~
change in use or upon the failure to pay within thirty days of assessment, such
owner shall be liable for an additional penalty equal to ten percentum of the amoun
of the roll-back tax and interest, which penalty shall be collected as a part of
the tax. In addition to such penalty, there is hereby imposed interest of one-hal
percentum of the amount of the roll-back tax, interest and penalty, for each month
or fraction thereof during which the failure continues.
I
Any person making a material misstatement of fact in any application filed
pursuant hereto shall be liable for all taxes, in such amounts and at such times as
if such property had been assessed on the basis of fair market value as applied to
other real estate in the taxing jurisdiction, together with interest and penalties
thereon, and he shall be further assessed with an additional penalty of one hundre
percentum of such unpaid taxes.
i
G. The provisions of Title 58 of the Code of Virginia applicable to local leviesl
and real estate assessment and taxation shall be applicable to assessments and
taxation hereunder mutatis mutandis including, without limitation, provisions
relating to tax liens and the correction of erroneous assessments, and for such
purposes the roll-back taxes shall be considered to be deferred real estate taxes.
.'
5-27-75
H. Separation or split-off of a part of the real estate which is being valued,
assessed or taxed under this section, either by conveyance or other action of the
owner of such real estate for a use other than agricultural, horticultural, forest
or open space use, shall subject the real estate so separated to liability for the
roll-back taxes appliable thereon, but shall not impair the right of the remaining
real estate to the continuance of such valuation, assessment and taxation provided
it meets the minimum acreage requirements and all other conditions of this section.
Where continguous real estate in agricultural, horticultural, forest or open spac
use in one ownership is located partly within and partly without the county,
compliance with the minimum acreage or gross sales requirement shall be determined
on the basis of the total acreage of such real estate and not the acreage located
within the county.
This amendment to take effect on May 27, 1975 and shall be effective for
I
all tax years beginning on and after January 1, 1976.
On motion of Supervisor Seibel and adopted by the following recorded
vote:
AYES:
Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
NAYS:
None
IN RE:
ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1253 AMENDING CHAPTER
7, BUILDINGS, CHAPTER 8, ELECTRICITY AND CHAPTER
13, PLUMBING OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County deems certain amend-
ments to the Roanoke County Code to be necessary in the best interests of the
health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of Roanoke County; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Intention to amend the Roanoke County Code as
I
proposed, and public hearing thereon, have been advertised and posted in accordanc
wi th 1 aw.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, that the Roanoke County Code be amended as follows:
Chapter 7. Buildings be amended and readopted as follows:
Chapter 7.
Buildings, Electricity and Plumbing Codes
Article I. Virginia Uniform Statewide Building
Code - Adopted.
Sec. 7-4.
Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code - Adopted is here
readopted in its entirety.
Article II. Buildings
Same - Permit fees is hereby adopted
Penalty for failure to obtain a permit prior to start of
construction is hereby readopted.
Statement of cost of construction is hereby readopted.
I
Sec. 7 - 1 .
Sec. 7-2.
Sec. 7-3.
Sec. 7-5.
Sec. 7-6.
Sec. 7-7.
I Sec. 7-8.
Sec. 7-9.
5-27-75
.'
Permit required for structures not covered by code is hereby
readopted.
Bond required is hereby readopted.
Certain unsafe buildings is hereby readopted.
The former Section 8-1, Definitions, is hereby renumbered
Section 7-8 and is hereby readopted in its entirety.
The former Section 8-2, Applicability of chapter to invorporated
town, is hereby renumbered Section 7-9 and is hereby readopted
in its entirety.
Sec. 7-10. The former Section 8-3, First inspection is hereby renumbered
Section 7-10 and is hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-11. The former Section 8-4, Final inspection, is hereby renumbered
Section 7-11 and is hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-12 The former Section 8-5, Covering work when electrical inspector
fails to appear, is hereby renumbered Section 7-12 and is
hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-13 The former Section 8-6, Uncovering wiring covered prior to
inspection, is hereby renumbered Section 7-13 and is hereby
readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-14 The former Section 8-7, Certificate of inspection, is hereby
renumbered Section 7-14 and is hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-15 The former Section 8-8, Report of violation, is hereby renumbered
Section 7-15 and is hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-16 The former Section 8-9, Periodic inspections of places of public
assemblages - Required; correction of defects; discontinuance of
electrical service, is hereby renumbered Section 7-16 and is
hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-17 The former Section 8-10, Same-Appeal from decision of inspector,
is hereby renumbered Section 7-17 and readopted in its entirety.
I
Sec. 7-18 The former Section 8-11, Violations Generally, is hereby renumbere
Section 7-18 and is hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-19 The former Section 8-12, Office continued; qualifications generall ,
is hereby renumbered Section 7-19 and is hereby readopted in its
entirety.
Sec. 7-20 The former Section 8-13, Enforcement of chapter; compliance with
chapter, is hereby renumbered Section 7-20 and is hereby
readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-21
I Sec. 7-22
Sec. 7-23
Sec. 7-24
The former Section 8-14, Not to work as electrician, is hereby
renumbered Section 7-21 and is hereby readopted in its entirety.
The former Section 8-15, Bond, is hereby renumbered Section 7-22
and is hereby readopted in tis entirety.
The former Section 8-16, Records; collection and disposition of
fees, is hereby renumbered Section 7-23 and is hereby readopted
in its entirety.
The former Section 8-17, When plans and diagrams required prior
to issuing of permits, is hereby renumbered Section 7-24 and is
hereby readopted in its entirety.
5-27-75
278
Sec. 7-25 The former Section 8-18, Right of entry; authority to disconnect
wiring, is hereby renumbered Section 7-25 and is hereby readopted
in its entirety.
Sec. 7-26 The former Section 8-19, File of publications to be maintained, is
hereby renumbered Section 7-26 and is hereby readopted in its
entirety.
Sec. 7-27 The former Section 8-20, Interfering with during discharge of duties
prohibited, is hereby renumbered Section 7-27 and is hereby readopte
in its entirety.
I
Sec. 7-28 The former Section 8-21, Delegation of authority is hereby renumbere
Section 7-28 and is hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-29 The former Section 8-22, Examining Board; Established; composition;
qualifications and term of office of members, is hereby renumbered
Section 7-29 and is hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-30 The former Section 8-23, List of prospective members; appointment of
members and alternates, is hereby renumbered Section 7-30 and is
hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-31 The former Section 8-24, Powers and duties, is hereby renumbered
Section 7-31 and is hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-32 The former Section 8-25, Meeting dates, is hereby renumbered
Section 7-32 and is hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-33 The former Section 8-26, Form; passing grade, is hereby renumbered
Section 7-33 and is hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-34 The former Section 8-27, Identification of applicant, grading.
procedure, is hereby renumbered Section 7-24 and is hereby
readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-35 The former Section 8-28, Filing; inspection; destruction, is hereby
renumbered Section 7-35 and is hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-36 The former Section 8-29, Master electrician examination - Applica-
tion; fee; contents, is hereby renumbered Section 7-36 and is
hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-37 The former Section 8-30, Eligibility of applicants, is hereby
renumbered Section 7-37 and is hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-38 The former Section 8-31, Journeyman Examination, is hereby renumbere~
Section 7-38 and is hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-39 The former Section 8-32, Reexamination, is hereby renumbered
Section 7-39 and is hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-40 The former Section 8-33, Card required, is hereby renumbered
Section 7-40 and is hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-41 The former Section 8-34, Expiration and renewal generally of
electrical cards, is hereby renumbered Section 7-41 and is hereby
readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-42 The former Section 8-35, Renewal of master electrician's card, is
hereby renumbered Section Section 7-42 and is hereby readopted in
its entirety.
Sec. 7-43 The former Section 8-36, Term of validity of card for contracting
firm represented by master electrician, is hereby renumbered
Section 7-43 and is hereby readopted in its entirety.
I
I
5-27-75
2']'-9 -
Sec. 7-44 The former Section 8-37, Employment of person not licensed
prohibited; exception; apprentices, is hereby renumbered
Section 7-44 and is hereby readopted in its entirety.
I
Sec. 7-45 The former Section 8-38, Revocation or suspension of cards
generally, is hereby renumbered Section 7-45 and is hereby
readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-46 The former Section 8-39, Working while card suspended or
revoked prohibited, is hereby renumbered Section 7-46 and is
hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-47 The former Section 8-40, Master electrician's bond required, is
hereby renumbered Section 7-47 and is hereby readopted in its
entirety.
Sec. 7-48 The former Section 8-41, Registration book for master electricians;
sign indicating electrician bonded, is hereby renumbered Section
7-48 and is hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-49 The former Section 8-42 Advertising prohibited except by bonded
master electrician, is hereby renumbered Section 7-49 and is
hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-50 The former Section 8-43, Renewal of master electrician bond, is
hereby renumbered Section 7-50 and is hereby readopted in its
entirety.
Sec. 7-51 The former Section 8-43.1 Owner installation on own residence is
hereby renumbered Section 7-51 and is hereby readopted in its
entirety.
I
Sec. 7-52 The former Section 8-45 Permits, issuance; fees, is hereby renum- I
bered Section 7-52 and is hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-53 The former Section 8-46 Receipts, collection of and accounting for
fees, is hereby renumbered Section 7-53 and is hereby readopted in
its entirety.
Sec. 7-54 The former Section 8-47, Disposition of fees, is hereby renumbered
Section 7-54 and is hereby readopted in its entirety.
Article IV. Plumbing
Sec. 7-55 The former Section 13-2, Applicability to incorporated towns is
hereby renumbered Section 7-55 and is hereby readopted in its
entirety.
Sec. 7-56 The former Section 13-4 Plumbing installation or maintenance by
homeowner, is hereby renumbered Section 7-56 and is hereby readopted
in its entirety.
,4&
28 :0. .~
Sec. 7-62. The former Section 13-11, Stop work orders, is hereby
renumbered Section 7-62 and is hereby readopted in
its entirety.
Sec. 7-63. The former Section 13-12, Revocation of permits,
is hereby renumbered Section 7-63 and is hereby
readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-64. The former Section 13-13, Unsafe installations, is
hereby renumbered Section 7-64 and is hereby
readopted in its entirety.
I
Sec. 7-65. The former Section 13-14, Requirements not covered
by code, is hereby renumbered Section 7-65 and
is hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-66. The former Section 13-15, Alternate materials
and alternate methods of installation, is hereby
renumbered Section 7-66 and is hereby readopted
in its entirety.
Sec. 7-67. The former Section 13-16, Liability, is hereby
renumbered Section 7-67 and is hereby readopted
in its entirety.
Sec. 7-68. The former Section 13-17, Reports, is hereby
renumbered Section 7-68 and is hereby readopted
in its entirety.
Sec. 7-69. The former Section 13-18, Appeals Board; when called;
composition, is hereby renumbered Section 7-69 and
is hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-70. The former Section 13-19, Qualifications of members;
compensation, is hereby renumbered Section 7-70
and is hereby readopted in its entirety.
I
Sec. 7-71. The former Section 13-20, Chairman, is hereby renum-
bered Section 7-71 and is hereby readopted in its
entirety.
Sec. 7-72. The former Section 13-21, Meetings; actions on
appeal, is hereby renumbered Section 7-72 and
is hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-73. The former Section 13-22, Authority to construe
chapter; hearing to be open, is hereby renumbered
Section 7-73 and is hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-74. The former Section 13-23, Quorum, is hereby
renumbered Section 7-74 and is hereby readopted
in its entirety.
Sec. 7-75. The former Section 13-24, Minutes; form of final
decision, is hereby renumbered Section 7-75 and
is hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-76. The former Section 13-25, Conflict of interest of
members, is hereby renumbered Section 7-76 and
readopted in its entirety.
I
Sec. 7-77. The former Section 13-26, Appeal from decision of
board of appeals, is hereby renumbered Section
7-77 and is hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-78. The former Section 13-27, Discharge of board of
\l~"~;
~.
appeals; frequency of service as member, is hereby
renumbered Section 7-78 and is hereby readopted in
its entirety.
Sec. 7-79. The former Section 13-28, Roughing-in inspection,
is hereby renumbered Section 7-79 and readopted
in its entirety.
I
Sec. 7-80. The former Section 13-29, Final inspection, is hereby
renumbered Section 7-80 and readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-81. The former Section 13-30, Illegal work, revocation
of license, is hereby renumbered Section 7-81 and
is hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-82. The former Section 13-31, Bond required, is hereby
renumbered Section 7-82 and readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-83. The former Section 13-32, Allowing ones name, license
or bond to be used to obtain permit fraudulently,
is hereby renumbered Section 7-83 and readopted in
its entirety.
Sec. 7-84. The former Section 13-33, Expiration, is hereby
renumbered Section 7-84 and readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-85. The former Section 13-34, Required prior to
performing work; qualification of person to whom
issued, is hereby renumbered Section 7-85 and
readopted in its entirety.
I
Sec. 7-86. The former Section 13-35, Board of plumber examiners-
Appointment; composition; term of members, is
hereby renumbered Section 7-86 and readopted in
its entirety.
Sec. 7-87. The former Section 13-36, Same - Powers and duties,
is hereby renumbered Section 7-87 and readopted
in its entirety.
Sec. 7-88. The former Section 13-37, Same - Chairman, is
hereby renumbered Section 7-88 and readopted in
its entirety.
Sec. 7-89. The former Section 13-38, Examinations and cer-
tificates of qualifications - Required prior to
engaging in plumbing business, is hereby renumbered
Section 7-89 and readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-90. The former Section 13-39, Same - Application for,
is hereby renumbered Section 7-90 and readopted
in its entirety.
Sec. 7-91. The former section 13-40, Same - Fees for examination,
is hereby renumbered Section 7-91 and readopted
in its entirety.
I
Sec. 7-92. The former Section 13-41, Same - Reexamination,
is hereby renumbered Section 7-92 and is hereby
readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-93. The former Section 13-42, Same - Duration of
certificates; renewal, is hereby renumbered Section
7-93 and readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-94. The former Section 13-43, Same - Validity of
certificates, is hereby renumbered Section 7-94
and is hereby readopted in its entirety.
...
5-27-75
~282
Sec. 7-95 The former Section 13-44, Same - Revocation of certificates, is here y
renumbered Section 7-95 and is hereby readopted in its entirety.
Sec. 7-96 The former Section 13-45, Permits required generally is hereby
renumbered Section 7-96 and is hereby readopted in its entirety.
Chapter 8, Electricity, be and it is hereby repealed in its entirety.
Chapter 13, Plumbing, be and it is hereby repealed in its entirety.
This amendment to take effect on May 27, 1975.
I
On motion of Supervisor Johnson and adopted by the following recorded
vote:
AYES: Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
NAYS: None
IN RE:
APPLICATION OF ALVIN ODELL BRYANT FOR A SPECIAL
EXCEPTION TO PARK A MOBILE HOME ON A ONE-ACRE
TRACT LOCATED 600 FEET EAST OF ROUTE 603 IN
ELLISTON
APPROVED
Supervisor Hilton moved that the application of Alvin Odell Bryant for a
special exception to park a mobile home on a one-acre tract located 600 feet east
of State Route 603, 1 1/2 miles south of U. S. Route 11-460 in Elliston be
to mobil e homes.
I
approved subject to the provisions of the County Zoning Ordinance as it pertains
The motion was adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
NA YS : None
Mr. Bryant was present at the hearing. There was no opposition.
IN RE:
APPLICATION OF DANNY LEON CLARK FOR A SPECIAL )
EXCEPTION TO PARK A MOBILE HOME ON A 3.7-ACRE )
TRACT LOCATED 1 1/8 MILES OFF ROUTE 460 )
APPROVED
Supervisor Hilton moved that the application of Danny Leon Clark for a
special exception to park a mobile home on a 3.7-acre tract located 1 1/8 miles off
Route 460 on the east side of Route 603 in the Catawba District be approved
effective August 14, 1975 subject to the provisions of the County Zoning Ordinance
as it pertains to mobile homes.
The motion was adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
I
NAYS: None
5-27-75
.~4
".~:il
. ''''-}';:'~'\
2 8 -~51 :
IN RE:
REQUEST OF MRS. JANET T. SPICKARD FOR A SPECIAL)
EXCEPTION TO OPERATE A BEAUTY SHOP IN HER HOME )
LOCATED AT 4629 CASPER DRIVE, N. E. )
APPROVED
I
Supervisor Seibel moved that the request of Mrs. Janet Spickard for a
special exception to operate a beauty shop in her home located at 4629 Casper
Drive, N. E. in the Vinton District be approved subject to the provisions of the
Zoning Ordinance as it pertains to mobile homes.
The motion was adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
NAYS: None
Mr. Spickard was present at the hearing. There was no opposition.
IN RE:
PETITION OF RONALD D. AND BELVA S. FORBES )
FOR REZONING THREE ACRES LOCATED AT 2602 )
CANNADY ROAD, N.E. FROM R-l to A-l IN ORDER)
TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A GREEN HOUSE FOR )
THE PURPOSE OF RAISING PLANTS )
APPROYED
FINAL ORDER
I
WHEREAS, application has been made to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County to have three acres of land situated at 2602 Cannady Road in Roanoke County
rezoned from Residential District R-l to Agriculture District A-l, said property
being more particularily described in petition filed with this Board; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission has recommended that the
land be rezoned from Residential District R-l to Agriculture District A-l; and
WHEREAS, notices have been published as required by law; and
WHEREAS, the hearing provided for in said notice was held on May 27,
1975, at 7:00 p.m. before the Board of Supervisors, at which hearing all parties
in interest and citizens were given an opportunity to be heard, both for and
against the proposed rezoning; and
WHEREAS, the Board, after considering the evidence as herein provided, is
of the opinion that the heretofore described land should be rezoned.
I
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors that the heretofore
described land be and the same is hereby rezoned and Zone Designation changed from
Residential District R-l to Agriculture District A-l.
On motion of Supervisor Seibel and adopted by the following recorded vote
AYES: Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
NAYS: None
Mr. Frank Selby, Attorney, appeared on behalf of the petitioners. There
was no opposition.
-.;~., .....
",'.' "",
. ,
5-27-75
" ~R"4
Mr. Elbert Waldron appeared before the Board and presented two identical
resolutions from the Roanoke Valley Home Builders Association and Roanoke Valley
Board of Realtors; one on tax reassessment and the other on County Planning.
On the motion of Supervisor Hilton and the unanimous voice vote of the
I
Board, the following ordinances and resolution were this date received and filed:
Ordinance No. 22232 amending and reordaining Section 14, Charges for
scientific treatment and disposal - Imposition, of Article II, Sewage
Disposal, Cahpter 7, Sewers and sewage disposal, Title XVII, Streets,
Sidewalks and Sewers, of the Roanoke City Code, 1956, as amended.
Ordinance No. 22233 amending and reordaining Section 22, Connection of
certain properties outside corporate limits; charges, of Article II,
Sewage Disposal, Chapter 7, Sewers and sewage disposal, Title XVII, Stree s,
Sidewalks and Sewers, of the Roanoke City Code, 1956, as amended.
Resolution No. 22234 temporarily granting to certain persons presently
discharging water, sewage or other effluence into the City's sanitary
sewer system, the option to elect to be charged for such sewerage service
according to the schedule for,Class I and II users proposed to be adopted
as a part of the pending Industrial Wastewater Code, in lieu of paying
those charges imposed in Article II of Chapter 7, Title XVII of the
Roanoke City Code, 1956, as amended.
IN RE:
SEWER INTERCEPTORS
On the motion of Supervisor Seibel and the unanimous voice vote of the
I
Board, Resolution No. 22241, adopted by Roanoke City Council, expressing the
willingness of said Council to join with adjoining political Subdivisions in the
construction of certain new sanitary sewer interceptors was this date received and
referred to the Roanoke County Public Service Authority for appropriate action.
IN RE:
RESOLUTION NO. 1254 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN REPAIR
WORK TO THE COURTHOUSE BOILER
WHEREAS, funds are available out of the present County budget for
necessary repairs to the boiler and heating system in the Courthouse; and
WHEREAS, two proposals were received and studied by the County's Public
Works Department for inspecting and repairing the boiler and heating system in the
Courthouse; and
WHEREAS, the County Administrator has recommended that the proposal of
Owen Plumbing and Heating, Inc. for said work be accepted, said proposal being the
lowest and best proposal received by the County which fully meets the County's
I
specifications.
5-27-75
"~"i/!'.{,,,
~-~
28.
I
I
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke I
i
County that the proposal of Owen Plumbing and Heating, Inc. in the amount of I
$4,237, said proposal being the lowest and best proposal fully meeting the County's!
I
i
specifications, for repair work to the boiler and heating system in the Roanoke i
i
County Courthouse, be, and the same is hereby accepted; the County Administrator i
being authorized to enter into a contract with said company, said contract to be inl
I
a form to be approved by the County Attorney. I
On motion of Supervisor Dodson and adopted by the following recorded votel
I
AYES: Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora I
~
NAYS:
None
I
I
!
I
~
I
I
tol
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
i
I
I
i
I
!
!
I
IN RE:
RESOLUTION NO. 1255 APPROVING THE ENTERING OF A
CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF RESTROOM FACILITIES
AT THE SANITATION DIVISION HEADQUARTERS
WHEREAS, within the current Roanoke County budget, funds were included
provide additional restroom facilities in the building on Roanoke Street used as
headquarters for the Sanitation Division; and
WHEREAS, two quotations for said construction work were received and
I
reviewed by the County Engineer and Superintendent of Public Works; and
WHEREAS, the County Administrator has recommended, in his report dated
May 27, 1975, that the bid of Martin Brothers Contractors, Inc., offering to fur-
nish all work for a turn-key project for the sum of $7,143 under a cost-plus
contract, with any savings to be credited to the County, be accepted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County that the bid of Martin Brothers Contractors, Inc., offering to furnish all
work for a turn-key project for the sum of $7,143 under a cost-plus contract, with
any savings to be credited to the County, be and the same is hereby accepted; the
County Administrator being authorized to enter into a contract with said company,
said contract to be in a form as approved by the County Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Seibel and adopted by the following recorded
I
vote:
AYES:
Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
NAYS: None
r,., ,; .
1\;,t.~....'
5-27-75
'~8'6
INRE:
AUDIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 74/75
Supervisor Seibel moved that the firm of Daniel A. Robinson & Associates
be authorized to proceed with the County's annual audit for 1974-75.
The motion was adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
None
I
IN RE:
COURTHOUSE/JAIL/ADMINISTRATION STUDY
On the motion of Supervisor Dodson and the unanimous voice vote of the
Board, the Feasibility Study of Courthouse, Jail & Administrative Facilities for
Roanoke County was this date received and filed. The Supervisors agreed to meet
in Executive Session with Salem City Council on Monday evening, June 2, 1975, at
7:00 p.m. at the Salem-Roanoke Valley Civic Center.
IN RE:
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE CHANGING
THE POllING PLACE FOR THE EDGEWOOD PRECINCT
BE IT RESOLVED that a public hearing be held on July 22, 1975, at
7:00 p.m. at a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors at which time it will be
moved that the following ordinance be adopted:
AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE POllING PLACE FOR THE EDGEWOOD
PRECINCT.
I
On motion of Supervisor Hilton and adopted by the following recorded
vote:
AYES: Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
NAYS: None
The entire Notice of Intention is filed with the minutes of this meeting.
IN RE:
RESOLUTION NO. 1256 RELATING TO THE CONVEYANCE
OF CERTAIN COUNTY PROPERTY
WHEREAS, by deed dated May 29, 1974, four parcels of land situate in
Statesman Industrial Park in Roanoke County were conveyed to the Board of Super-
visors of Roanoke County with the express understanding that said parcels would be
utilized in the construction of industrial access roads pursuant to the provisions
I
of the Code of Virginia; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, in order to comply
with the provisions of the Code of Virginia and the requirements of the State
Highway Department, desires to convey the hereinafter described four parcels of
land to the Commonwealth of Virginia in order to provide for the construction of
industrial access roads; and
5-27-75
J"
28
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors desires that its Chairman and Clerk be
authorized and directed to execute a deed on behalf of the County for the convey-
ance of said land for no monetary consideration, which is deemed to be just and
I
fair inasmuch as the Board of Supervisors acquired said property only for the
express purpose of deeding it to the Commonwealth for use as an industrial access
road; and
WHEREAS, the County no longer needs or desires the said parcel of land
for any of the purposes of the County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County that the Chairman be, and he is hereby authorized and directed to sign on
behalf of the County a petition, addressed to the Judge of the Circuit Court of
Roanoke County, requesting Court approval for said conveyance, said petition set-
ting forth that the County no longer needs or desires to maintain ownership of the
hereinafter described four parcels of land for any of its purposes.
I
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, upon receipt of Court approval, the Chairmanl
I
and Clerk be, and they are hereby authorized and directed to execute on behalf of I
the County, the appropriate deed of conveyance for the following parcels of land: ,
I
1.
Parcel 1 containing 0.870 acres identified as a portion of
Seibel Drive.
2. Parcel 2 containing 1.380 acres identified as a portion of
Seibel Drive.
3. Parcel 3 containing 0.613 acres identified as a portion of
Mary Lynda Avenue.
4. Parcel 4 containing 1.755 acres identified as a portion of
Seibel Drive and Mary Lynda Avenue.
On motion of Supervisor Hilton and adopted by the following recorded
vote:
AYES:
Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Flora
I
NAYS: None
ABSTAINING:
Mr. Seibel
"'-,
5-27-75
"2;~~8-'
IN RE:
COUNTY PAYROLLS
On the motion of Supervisor Dodson and the following recorded vote, the
County Payrolls (Semi-monthly 5/15/75) and (Bi-weekly 5/23/75) were approved for
payment in the gross amount of $113,004.45 from which the sum of $12,586.73 F.I.T.,
$2,875.43 State Tax, $6,558.27 F.I.C.A., $2,496.47 Blue Cross, $3,603.21 VSRS,
$504.90 L.I., $99.15 ACC, $309.96 T.P., $133.05 A.F., $150.04 S.B., $930.50 C.U.,
I
$65.50 U.F., $268.05 Misc., are deducted leaving a net payroll of $82,423.21.
AYES:
NAYS:
Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
None
IN RE:
ACCOUNTS FOR PAYMENT
On the motion of Supervisor Hilton and the following recorded vote, the
current bills totaling $64,342.34 and the bills paid since last Board meeting
totaling $14,439.65 were today approved presently and retroactively.
AYES: Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Flora
NAYS: None
ABSTAINING: Mr. Seibel
IN RE:
RESOLUTION NO. 1257 AUTHORIZING THE TREASURER
TO BORROW FUNDS
I
WHEREAS, by report dated May 21, 1975, the Treasurer of Roanoke County
has advised that it would be necessary for the Board of Supervisors to authorize
the County Treasurer to borrow a sum of money for the purpose of meeting the
financial obligations of the County, and to thereby create a debt in anticipation
of revenue due to said County; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors is authorized by Section 15.1-545 of
the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, to borrow no earlier than February 1st of
any year a sum of money not to exceed one-half of the amount of money produced by
the County levy laid in said County for the year in which said loan is negotiated,
the terms of said loan to provide that interest shall not exceed six percent (6%)
per annum and that the principal and interest thereon shall be paid no later than
December 15th of the same year; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary at this time for the Board of Supervisors of
I
Roanoke County to authorize the Treasurer to borrow a sum of money not exceeding
a total amount of One Million Dollars for the purpose hereinabove set out.
~.>.'.>'..' ,.'.11,,' 't'r.,.'
'Y"~
5-27-75
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County that this Board does hereby authorize the Treasurer to negotiate, on behalf
of the County, a loan or loans and borrow as needed a sum of money not exceeding a
total amount of One Million Dollars at such banks and lending institutions of this
I
State as are willing to make the loan or loans at a rate of interest not exceeding
six percent (6%) per annum, on demand; the maturity date or dates of said loan or
loans being no later than December 15, 1975, said loan or loans to be evidenced by
the negotiable note or notes of this Board of Supervisors and to be executed as
follows:
The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, by Richard C. Flora,
Chairman, who signature shall be duly attested by William F. Clark, Clerk; said
note to become due and payable to, and at such bank or banking institution as the
bank making the loan may direct, it being ordered that the loan be repaid at
maturity without further order of the Board of Supervisors.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson and adopted by the following recorded
vote:
I
AYES:
NAYS:
Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
None
IN RE:
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT - ROAD ORDER
On the motion of Supervisor Hilton and the unanimous voice vote of the
Board, the following road was this date requested to become a part of the State
Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County:
South Drive from East Drive (Route 1865) to end, a distance of
0.09 mile in Dillard Court Subdivision.
IN RE:
REGIONAL LANDFILL
On the motion of Supervisor Johnson and the unanimous voice vote of the
Board, the County Attorney was directed to prepare a resolution recommending an
I
amendment to the Regional Solid Wastes Disposal Agreement so as to clarify the
intent for site location(s) and other minor modifications not changing the basic
principles of the Agreement.
..
5-27-75
290..
IN RE:
FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION - WITHDRAWAL
Supervisor Dodson brought up the matter of Roanoke County's withdrawal
from the Fifth Planning District Commission effective June 30, 1975. Mr. Dodson
suggested that the County reconsider withdrawing from said Commission until the
full Commission has had a chance to vote on changing its By-laws.
On the motion of Supervisor Seibel and the unanimous voice vote of the
I
Board, the matter was tabled.
IN RE:
RESOLUTION NO. 1258 RECOGNIZING THE SERIVCE
OF MRS. BARBARA SPEAR
WHEREAS, MRS. BARBARA SPEAR, who is to retire on May 31, 1975, as
Secretary to the Executive Director of the Roanoke County Public Service Authority,
after having served in said capacity since July of 1964, has served said Authority
with an outstanding quality of service and dedication while carrying out her duties
in said capacity; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County deems it appropriate
to recognize the occasion of the retirement of an individual who has contributed so
much to the operation of the County government through her employment as Executive
Secretary of the Roanoke County Public Service Authority.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
I
County that said Board hereby expresses its appreciation to MRS. BARBARA SPEAR
for the meritorious service rendered to the Roanoke County Public Service Authorit)
and further wishes for her a long and happy retirement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk transmit a certified copy of this
resolution to Mrs. Spear on behalf of the Board of Supervisors.
On motion of Supervisor Seibel and adopted by the following recorded
vote:
AYES: Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
NAYS: None
I
5-27-75
Of
IN RE:
PETITION OF TERESA AND JAMES S. WILSON, )
OWNERS, AND SUN OIL COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA)
AND WILSON J. MORRIS, LESSEES, FOR REZONING)
ABOUT ONE ACRE LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF )
U.S.ROUTE 11, ALSO KNOWN AS WILLIAMSON ROAD)
FROM B-2 TO B-3 IN ORDER TO CONTINUE TO )
OPERATE A USED AUTOMOBILE BUSINESS )
FINAL ORDER
I
WHEREAS, Teresa Wilson, James S. Wilson, owners and Sun Oil Company of
Pennsylvania and Wilson J. Morris, tja Morris Motors, lessees, did petition the
Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to rezone certain property described in said
petition to amend the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County so as to provide that
certain property described in said petition be rezoned from Business District B-2
to Business District B-3, which petition was filed at a regular meeting of this
Board on the 8th day of October, 1974 and by Order entered on that day was referred
to the Planning Commission for recommendation; and
WHEREAS, said Planning Commission by resolution adopted at a meeting on
the 19th day of November, 1974, after due advertisement and after hearing evidence
touching on the merits of said Petition, recommended to this Board that the rezonin
I
be denied, however, the Planning Commission felt that the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County should consider a special exception for a period of two years to
operate a used car sales lot at that location; and
WHEREAS, the Clerk of this Board did set the regular meeting of this
Board to be held on the 13th day of May, 1975, at 7:00 p.m., as the date and time
for public hearing on the aforesaid proposed amendment to said Zoning Ordinance andl
advertised same by notice duly published in accordance with law; and
WHEREAS, said public hearing was this day had on the said proposed
!amendment and continued to the May 27th meeting of the Board; and
WHEREAS, the Board after having given careful consideration to said
Petition and to said Planning Commission recommendation, and hearing evidence
touching on the mertis of said proposed amendment, being of the opinion that said
County Zoning Ordinance should be amended.
I
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED that at this meeting of the
Board of Supervisors held on the 13th day of May and 27th day of May, 1975, the
said Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance be, and the same is hereby amended so as to
reclassify the hereinafter described property from Business District B-2 to
Business District B-3 which property is described as follows, to-wit:
~ '0, .
5-27-75
'"292
Beginning at a point on the northerly side of U.S. Route 11, also
known as Williamson Road at its intersection with Plantation Road
and running parallel to Williamson Road, N. 770 22" West 200.0 feet to
a point; thence N. 120 381 East 137.06 feet to a point; thence S. 570
181 East 212.93 feet to a point; thence S. 120 381 West 64.0 feet to
the place of beginning and being known also as 7430 Williamson Road
and it is, accordingly, so RESOLVED and ORDERED.
The foregoing resolution was adopted on motion of Supervisor Seibel and
the following recorded vote:
AYES: Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel
I
NAYS: Mr. Flora
IN RE:
PETITION OF TERESA AND JAMES S. WILSON, OWNERS, )
AND SUN OIL COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA AND WILSON J.)
MORRIS, LESSEES, FOR REZONING ABOUT ONE ACRE ON )
THE NORTH SIDE OF U.S. ROUTE 11, ALSO KNOWN AS ) FINAL ORDER
WILLIAMSON ROAD FROM B-2 TO B-3 AND THE ISSUANCE )
OF A SPECIAL EXCEPTION )
WHEREAS, Teresa Wilson, James S. Wilson, owners, and Sun Oil Company of
Pennsylvania and Wilson J. Morris, tja Morris Motors, lessees, did petition the
Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to rezone certain property described in
said petition to amend the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County so as to provide that
certain property described in said petition be rezoned from Business District B-2
to Business District B-3, which petition was filed at a regular meeting of this
Board on the 8th day of October, 1974, and referred to the Planning Commission
I
for recommendation; and
WHEREAS, said Planning Commission by resolution adopted at a meeting on
the 19th day of November, 1974, after due advertisement and after hearing evidence
touching on the mertis of said Petition, recommended to this Board that the rezonin
petition be denied, however, the Planning Commission felt that the Board of
Supervisors should consider a special exception for a period of two years to operat
a used car sales lot at that location; and
WHEREAS, the Clerk of this Board did set the regular meeting of this
Board to be held on the 13th day of May, 1975, as the date for public hearing on
the aforesaid proposed amendment to said Zoning Ordinance and advertised the same
I
by notice duly published in accordance with law; and
WHEREAS, said public hearing was had on the 13th day of May and continued
to the 27th day of May on the said proposed amendment.
5-27-75
~ ~~ -..;, ,\
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the petitioners are
granted a special exception for a period of two years to operate a used car sales
lot at the property described in the Final Order of Rezoning.
I
The foregoing resolution was adopted on motion of Supervisor Hilton and
the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
NAYS: None
This concluded the business before the Board at this time, and on the
motion of Supervisor Johnson and the unanimous voice vote of the Board, the meeting
was adjourned at 11:05 p.m. to reconvene in Executive Session with Salem City
Council on Monday evening, June 2, 1975, 7:00 p.m. at the Salem-Roanoke Valley
Civic Center.
I
----.'.''''.';'''....-c'' ::::::=:.
I \~'-^
CHAIRMAN
\';
y C .-J)~["
..........
I