HomeMy WebLinkAbout6/10/1975 - Regular
,~-
~~.~
6-10-75
294
Salem-Roanoke Valley Civic Center
Salem, Virginia
June 10, 1975
7:00 P.M.
I
The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County met this day at the Salem-
Roanoke Valley Civic Center in Salem, Virginia, being the second Tuesday and the
first regular meeting of the month.
Members Present: Chairman Richard C. Flora, Vice-Chairman John G. Seibel
C. Lawrence Dodson, R. E. Hilton, Jr. and May Winn Johnson.
Chairman Flora called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and recognized
Reverend C. Lawrence Dodson, who offered the invocation. The Pledge of Allegiance
to the flag was given in unison, led by Chairman Flora.
IN RE:
PETITION OF THE 419 PARTNERSHIP AND EASTERN MOTOR)
INNS, INC. FOR REZONING 1.816 ACRES LOCATED ON )
THE SOUTHEAST SIDE OF ROUTE 419 DIRECTLY ACROSS ) FINAL ORDER
FROM THE ENTRANCE OF TANGLEWOOD MALL FROM B-2 )
TO B-3 )
I
WHEREAS, the 419 Partnership, a Virginia General Partnership and Eastern
Motor Inns, Inc., a Virginia corporation, petitioned this Board and requested that
the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance be amended so as to provide that certain
property described in said petition be rezoned and reclassified as Business Districv
B-3 which petition was filed at a regular meeting of this Board held on April 22,
1975, and by order entered that day was referred to the Planning Commission for
its recommendation; and
WHEREAS, said Planning Commission by a resolution adopted at a meeting
held on May 20, 1975, after hearing evidence touching on the merits of said
petition, recommended to this Board that said County Zoning Ordinance be amended
so as to change the classification of the property described in said petition from
Business District B-2 and Residential District R-3 to Business District B-3; and
I
WHEREAS, the Clerk of this Board did set the regular meeting of this
Board held on June 10, 1975, as the time and date for a public hearing on the
aforesaid proposed amendment to said County Zoning Ordinance and advertised the
same by notice duly published in accordance with law; and
WHEREAS, said public hearing was held on the proposed amendment on the
lOth day of June, 1975; and
;...~.....
~
6-10-75
2/ ~'I 5
WHEREAS, said Board, after giving careful consideration to said petition
and to said recommendation, after hearing evidence touching on the merits of said
proposed amendment to the County Zoning Ordinance, being of the opinion that said
County Zoning Ordinance should be amended as requested in said petition and as
recommended by said Planning Commission.
I
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED that at this meeting of the
Board of Supervisors held on the 10th day of June, 1975, the said County Zoning
Ordinance be, and the same is hereby amended so as to reclassify the property
described in said petition from Business District B-2 and Residential District R-3
to Business District B-3 in order that said property might be more fully and
reasonably used.
The foregoing resolution was adopted on motion of Supervisor Johnson and
the following recorded vote:
AYES: Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
NAYS: None
Michael K. Smeltzer, Attorney, appeared on behalf of the petitioners.
No one appeared in opposition.
IN RE:
PETITION OF THE 419 PARTNERSHIP FOR REZONING 0.564
ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST SIDE OF ROUTE 419
DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM THE ENTRANCE OF TANGLEWOOD MALL
I
WHEREAS, the 419 Partnership, a Virginia General Partnership, petitioned
this Board and requested that the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance be amended so as
to provide that certain property described in said petition be rezoned and
reclassified in its entirety as Business District B-2, which petition was filed at
a regular meeting of this Board held on April 22, 1975, and that day was referred
to the Planning Commission for its recommendation; and
WHEREAS, the said Planning Commission by a resolution adopted at a
meeting held on May 20, 1975, after hearing evidence touching on the merits of said
petition, recommended to this Board that said County Zoning Ordinance be amended so
as to change the classification of the entire property described in said petition
to Business District B-2; and
I
WHEREAS, the Clerk of this Board did set the regular meeting of this
Board, held on June 10, 1975, as the time and date for a public hearing on the
aforesaid proposed amendment to said County Zoning Ordinance and advertised the
same by notice duly published in accordance with law; and
6-10-75
29:6
WHEREAS, said public hearing was held on the proposed amendment on the
lOth day of June, 1975; and
WHEREAS, this Board, after giving careful consideration to said petition
and to said Planning Commission recommendation, after hearing evidence touching on
I
the merits of the said proposed amendment to the County Zoning Ordinance, being
of the opinion that said County Zoning Ordinance should be amended as requested in
said petition and as recommended by said Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED that at this meeting of the
Board of Supervisorss the said County Zoning Ordinance be, and the same is hereby
amended so as to reclassify the entire property described in said petition as
Business District B-2 in order that said property might be more fully and
reasonably used.
The foregoing resolution was adopted on motion of Supervisor Johnson
and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
NAYS: None
I
Mr. Michael K. Smeltzer, Attorney, appeared on behalf of the petitioners.
There was no opposition.
IN RE:
COMMITTEE REPORT - SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
On the motion of Supervisor Seibel and the unanimous voice vote of the
Board, the report of the ad hoc committee to study the Soil Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance was this date received and the following recommendations
approved:
1. Adopt the proposed Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance as
originally offered with minor modifications to comply with present
State law; the effective date should be twelve months from adoption,
during which time the County shall establish, consistent with the
State program and guidelines, conservation standards including
I
criteria, guidelines, techniques, and methods for control of
erosion and sediment resulting from land-disturbing activities.
2.
Continue the ad hoc committee with instructions to recommend interim
erosion control regulations on or before September 1, 1975.
3. Request the same committee to study the present State law and
recommend amendments which can be proposed at the 1976 session of
the General Assembly.
I
I
i*,~.'
~~-
6-10-75
2,.Q 7
IN RE:
ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1259 AMENDING THE ROANOKE
COUNTY CODE BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW CHAPTER, NUMBERED
CHAPTER 8.1 AND ENTITLED SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors deems certain amendments to the Roanoke
County Code to be necessary in the best interests of the health, safety and general
welfare of the citizens of Roanoke County; and
WHEREAS, a notice of intention to amend the Roanoke County Code as
I
proposed, and public hearing thereon, have been advertised and posted in accordance
with law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County that the Roanoke County Code be amended as follows:
The addition of a new chapter numbered 8.1 and entitled
Soil Erosion and Sediment Control as follows:
CHAPTER 8. 1
Soil Erosion and Sediment Control
Sec. 1. Purpose of chapter.
The purpose of this chapter is to provide a means for the control of erosion
and sediment in order to promote the public health and welfare of the citizens of
the County and to establish procedures for the administration and enforcement of
such controls.
Sec. 2. Application.
I
Except as provided for in Section 4 of this chapter, no person may engage in
any land disturbing activity, until such person has submitted to, has had reviewed
and has had approved by the county engineer, an erosion and sediment control plan
for such land disturbing activity and has had issued a land disturbing permit.
It is the further intent of this chapter to be administered, where applicable,
in conjunction with both the county's subdivision and zoning ordinances wherein
such apply to the development and subdivision of land within the county or such
apply to development on previously subdivided land within the county.
Sec. 3. Definitions.
For the purpose of this chapter, certain terms and words used herein shall be
interpreted as follows:
1. "Clearingll shall mean any activity which removes the vegetative ground
cover including, but not limited to, root mat removal and topsoil removal.
2. "Excavating" shall mean any digging, scooping, or other methods of
removing earth materials.
3. II Eros i on and sedi ment control plan II or "Pl an II sha 11 mean a document con-
taining material for the conservation of soil and water resources of a unit
or a group of units of land as required by this chapter.
4. "Filling" shall mean any depositing or stockpiling of earth materials.
5. "Grading" shall mean any excavating or filling of earth materials or any
combination thereof, including the land in its excavated or filled condition.
I
6-10-75
6. "Land disturbing activity" shall mean any land change which may result in
soil erosion from water or wind and the movement of sediments into waters or
onto lands, including but not limited to clearing, grading, excavating,
transporting and filling of land.
I
7. "Land di sturbi ng permi t" sha 11 mean a permi t issued by the county engi neer
for clearing, filling, excavating, grading or transporting, or any combination
thereof, on all lands except as excluded elsewhere in this chapter.
8. "Person" shall mean any individual, partnership, firm, association, joint
venture, public or private corporation, trust, estate, commission, board,
public or private institution, utility, cooperative or any other legal entity.
9. "Transporting" shall mean any moving of earth materials from one place to
another, orther than such movement incidential to grading, when such movement
results in destroying the vegetative ground cover either by tracking or the
buildup of earth materials to the extent that erosion and sediment will result
from the soil or earth materials over which such transporting occurs.
Sec. 4. Non-controlled activities.
The provi s ions of it hi s chapter sha 11 not be construed to apply to the
following:
1. such minor land disturbing activities as home gardens and individual home
landscaping, repairs and maintenance work;
2. individual service connections and construction or installation of public
util i ty 1 i nes;
3. surface or deep mining, tilling, planting or harvesting of agricultural,
horticultural or forest crops;
I
4. construction, repair or rebuilding of the tracks, rights of way, bridges,
communication facilities and other realted structures and facilities of a
railroad company;
5. septic tank lines or drainage fields unless included in an overall plan
for land disturbing activity relating to construction of the building to be
served by the septic tank systems;
6. installation of fence and sign posts or telephone and electric poles and
other kinds of posts or poles;
7. emergency work to protect life, limb or property, and emergency repairs;
provided that the land area disturbed shall be shaped and stablized in
accordance with the requirements of the county engineer;
8. land disturbing activities on federal or state lands;
9. preparation for single family residences separately built, unless in
conjunction with multiple construction in subdivision development;
I
10. disturbed land areas for commercial or non-commercial uses of less than
10,000 square feet in size; and
11. other minor land disturbing activities where, in the written opinion of th
county engineer, erosion and sediment control measures are deemed unnecessary.
Sec. 5. Enforcing agent.
Enforcement of this chapter shall rest with the county engineer. Where
applicable, the county engineer shall undertake such review as a portion of his
obligation for review, approval and inspection under Section 17-13, Approval; time
for recording, of this Code and under Article XXI, Site plan, Cahpter 21, Zoning
of this Code.
....~
6-10-75
299
Sec. 6. Erosion and sediment control plan.
A. an erosion and sediment control plan is required under this chapter and
shall detail those methods and techniques to be utilized in the control of erosion
and sediment.
B. As a minimum, the erosion and sediment control plan shall follow the
hereinafter set out format:
1. An erosion and sediment control plan is defined as a document containing
material for the conservation of soil and water resources of a unit or group
of units of land. It may include appropriate maps, an appropriate soil and
water plan inventory and management information with needed interpretations,
and a record of decisions contributing to conservation treatment. The plan
shall contain all major conservation decisions to assure that the entire unit
or units of land will be so treated to achieve the conservation objectives.
I
2. The plan shall consist of two parts:
A narrative report describing the project and glvlng the purposes,
schedule or phasing of major construction activities, schedule of application
of conservation practices, engineering assumption and calculations for the
control measures; and
A map or maps of the same scale or a base map with overlays, depicting
the topography of the area, the limits for clearing and grading, other propose
alterations of the area, and the location of the control measures and facili-
ities.
3. The plan shall spell out the methods, techniques and procedures to be
followed to control accelerated erosion and sedimentation and shall:
a. clearly identify the type, magnitude and location of both existing
and anticipated conservation problems;
b. define the areas to be affected by clearing and grading;
c. show the areas to be mulched and the areas to be established to
temporary or permanent vegetation;
I
d. account for the staging of major land disturbing activities and
include the timing and sequence of installing the conservation practices
and facilities;
e. show the location of erosion and sediment control practices, such
as sediment basins, diversions, waterways, storm drains, dikes, terraces
and similar structures when such practices are needed.
In addition, the plan should:
a. identify the predominant soils and provide details on topography,
drainage and existing vegetation; and
b. be an integral part of any site plan, subdivision plan, or grading
plan required by the county.
4. Conservation practices for erosion and sediment control shall meet or
exceed standards and specifications contained in this chapter. Practices for
which standards and specifications are not contained in this chapter may be
approved by the county engineer based on the merits of the practice as
proposed for use in individual circumstances.
It is recognized that within the county, the conservation practices
needed to control accelerated erosion and sedimentation vary widely from
site to site. Such factors as degree of slope, nature and types of soil,
drainage, characteristics, proximity to property boundaries and watercourses,
acreage disturbed, amount of cut and fill, as well as other factors have a
direct bearing on what combination of conservation practices will result in an
adequate erosion and sediment control plan.
I
6-10-75
.'.~~'
5. Recognizing the wide variations from one site to another, the following
elements are to be considered in the development of a plan:
I
a. A general statement of the project to be included in the narrative:
1. brief description of the overall project;
2. date project is to begin and expected date final stabilization will
be completed;
3. brief description of accelerated erosion control program.
4. brief description of sediment control program;
5. brief description of stormwater management program.
b. The topographic features to be shown on the map:
1. the location of the project relative to highways, municipalities,
major streams, or other identifiable landmarks;
2. acreage of the project;
3. contours at an interval and scale that will adequately describe
the area;
4. approximate limits of the flood plain;
5. critical environmental areas located within or in proximity of the
project areas, such as streams, lakes, ponds, wetland areas;
6. nature and extent of existing vegetation;
I
7. other significant features including map scale and north arrow.
c. Information on the soils to be presented in the narrative and shown
on the map:
1. adequate description of each soil, including soil name, texture,
slope, depth, drainage and structure.
2. surface area of each soil;
3. estimate of soil loss by use of the Universal Soil Loss Formula or
other acceptable methods. In the absence of a soil survey, a mechanical
analysis of the soil will be made to the depth of planned disturbance
or an on-site evaluation will be made by a qualified soil scientist.
d. The amount of runoff from the project area and the upstream watershed
to be described in the narrative.
1. Runoff producing factors considered.
I
2. Peak runoff from a ten-year or 100-year frequency storm based on
present and future developed conditions and according to the existing
hazards and degrees of protection required. If the watershed is greater
than one square mile in area, a peak runoff study of the lOO-year
frequency storm shall be prepared, taking into account present and future
developed conditions and the existing hazards and degree of protection
required. If the watershed is less than one square mile in area, a
peak runoff study of the lO-year frequency storm shall be prepared, takin
into account present and future developed conditions and the existing
hazards and degree of protection required.
3. Methods of calculation.
~...)...'..'
.. " '. 'If'
,","C"'.. l'
6-10-75
301
e. The storm water management program to be described in the narrative
and the location of facilities shown on the map.
1. Brief analysis of problems posed by storm runoff on downstream
areas.
2. Analysis of hydrologic factors of the project which may contri-
bute to the off-site problem(s).
3. Brief description of the permanent measures and facilities
designed to cope with the problem.
I
4. Plans for the long-range management of the control facilities.
f. The proposed alteration of the area to be shown on the map.
1. Limits of clearing and grading
2. Areas of cuts and fills
3. Roads, buildings, pond areas, and other structures
4. Stormwater management facilities.
g. The phasing or staging of land disturbing activities to be described
in the narrative.
1. Sequence of land clearing operations
2. Removal and stockpiling of topsoil
3. Major earth moving and grading
4. Control facility installation
I
5. Program of operations
h. Temporary erosion and sediment control, either vegetative or
mechanical, measures for use during active construction to be included in the
narrative and shown on the map.
1. Purpose
2. Types of measures and facilities
3. Location of measures and facilities
4. Dimensional details of the facilities
5. Design consideration and calculations (mechanical measures only)
i. Permanent erosion and sediment control measures for long-term
protection to be included in the narrative and shown on the map.
1. Purpose
2. Types of measures and facilities
4. Dimensional details of facilities
I
3. Location of measures and facilities
5. Design consideration and calculations (mechanical measures only)
6-10-75
~
3" 0 /j~~ ,
j. The maintenance program for the control facilities to be described
in the narrative.
1. Inspection program including frequency and schedule.
2. Resodding or reseeding of vegetated areas.
I
3. Repair or reconstruction of damaged structural measures.
4. The method and frequency of removal and disposal of solid waste
materials removed from the control facilities or the project area.
5. The method of disposing of temporary structural measures after
they have served their purposes.
However, whenever such information as is required by said plan duplicates that
required under the county zoning or subdivision ordinances, a single submission
indicating all required information is acceptable. When any of the information
required under the plan is not readily available or necessary, in the opinion of
the county engineer, for the review of any particular plan, its submission may be
waived in writing by the county engineer.
C. Approved standards and specifications for control techniques to be
utilized in preparing this plan are set forth in Part III of the Virginia Erosion
and Sediment Control Handbook, dated April, 1974, as the same may be amended from
time to time, which standards and specifications are adopted by reference, as fully
as if set out herein, as a portion of this chapter, together with such amendments
as are approved by the Board of Supervisors and by the Virginia Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
I
D. The erosion and sediment control plan shall, for any project where appli-
cable, be submitted in conjunction with a subdivision plat or a site plan and sha111
be reviewed in accordance with the review procedures set forth in the subdivision I
ordinance for subdivision plats and in the zoning ordinance for site plans. I
I
Sec. 7. Certification; bonding of performance.
All control measures required by the provisions of this chapter shall be
undertaken at the expense of the applicant; and pending such actual provision
thereof, the developer or subdivider shall execute and file with the Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors, prior to issuance of the land disturbing permit an agreement
and bond or cash escrow, letter of credit or other legal arrangement, any of such
to be approved by the county attorney, in an amount determined by the county
engineer to be equal to the approximate total cost of providing erosion and sedimen
control improvements, with surety approved by the finance officer, guaranteeing
that the required control measures will be properly and satisfactorily undertaken.
Such bonding may be combined with other performance bonds required in conjunction
with the county's zoning or subdivision ordinance.
I
Within 60 days of completion of the plan, such bond, cash escrow, letter of
credit or other legal arrangement, or the unexpended or unobligated portion thereof
shall be refunded to the applicant or terminated, as the case may be.
Should the applicant fail to comply with the requirements of the plan, the
county engineer shall give notice of such failure to comply in writing addressed
to the applicant at its last known address stating that the applicant shall have
30 days within which to comply with the requirements of the plan. Upon the expira-
tion of the above 30 days, and upon a further determination that the plan has not
been complied with, the county engineer may cause the necessary work to be done to
comply with said plan, the cost to the county of such work to constitute a lien on
the land upon which said work is done and to be recovered from the owner or other
person in possession, charge or control of said property. The county engineer shal
give the applicant five days written notice of his intention to have the county
proceed pursuant to the above procedure.
Sec. 8. Issuance of land disturbing permit; fees.
Except as provided in Section 4 of this chapter, no person shall engage in any
land disturbing activity within Roanoke County until he has acquired a land
disturbing permit from the county engineer.
'1.L::.:L..."
f.,~
6-10-75
3.u;3
Issuance of a land disturbing permit is conditioned upon an approved
erosion and sediment control plan which plan or certification of such shall be
presented at the time of application for such a permit and in addition, the
requirements of Section 7 of this chapter concerning a performance bond, cash
escrow, letter of credit, any combination thereof, or such other legal arrangement
as is acceptable under the provisions of Section 7 shall have been complied with.
The county engineer shall, within 45 days, approve any erosion and sediment
control plan submitted to him if he determines that the plan meets the conserva-
tion standards of the local control program and if the person responsible for
carrying out the plan certifies that he will properly perform the erosion and
sediment control measures included in the plan and will comply with the provisions
of this chapter. The county engineer shall act on all plans submitted to him
within 45 days from receipt thereof by either approving said plan in writing or by
disapproving said plan in writing and giving the specific reasons for its dis-
approval. When a plan submitted for approval pursuant to this chapter is found,
upon review by the county engineer, to be inadequate, the county engineer shall
specify such modifications, terms, and conditions as will permit approval of the
plan and shall communicate these requirements to the applicant. If no action is
taken by the county engineer within the time specified above, the plan shall be
deemed approved and the person shall be authorized to proceed with the proposed
activity upon compliance with all other requirements of this chapter.
Sec. 9. Amendment.
I
An approved erosion and sediment control plan may be amended only upon the
written approval of the county engineer. If the on-site inspection indicates that
the approved control measures are not effective in controlling erosion and sediment
or because of changed circumstances, the county engineer may direct that the
plan be amended to better realize the objectives of the plan.
Sec. 10. Monitoring, reports and inspections.
A. The county engineer shall periodically inspect the land disturbing
activity to insure compliance with the approved plan and to determine whether the
measures required in that plan are effective in controlling erosion and sediment
resulting from the land disturbing activity. The right of entry to conduct such
inspections shall be expressly reserved in the permit. The permit holder, or his
duly designated representative, shall be afforded the opportunity to accompany the
inspectors.
I
If the county engineer determines that the permit holder has failed to comply
with the plan, the county engineer shall immediately serve upon the permit holder
by registered or certified mail to the address specified by the permit holder in
his permit application a notice to comply. Such notice shall set forth specifi-
cally the measures needed to come into compliance with such plan and shall specify
the time within which such measures shall be completed. If the permit holder fails
to comply within the time specified, he may be subject to revocation of the permit;
futhermore, he shall be deemed to be in violation of this chapter and upon con-
viction shall be subject to the penalties provided by this chapter.
B. With respect to approved plans for erosion and sediment control in
connection with all regulated land disturbing activities, the county engineer may
require of the person responsible for carrying out the plan such monitoring and
reports, and may make such on-site inspections after notice to that person as are
deemed necessary to determine whether the soil erosion and sediment control
measures required by the approved plan are being properly performed, and whether
such measures are effective in controlling soil erosion and sediment resulting
from the land disturbing activity. Such person shall be afforded an opportunity
to accompany the inspectors on anyon-site inspection.
I
Sec. 11. Appea 1 .
Any applicant, under the provlslons of this chapter who is aggrieved by any
action of the county engineer in disapproving plans submitted in accordance with
this chapter or by the county engineer's interpretation of the regulations of this
chapter shall have the right to apply for and receive review of such action by the
county.s planning commission, which decision shall be made in writing.
. <<<
-::
.
6-10-75
~304
Any person, or persons, jointly or severally aggrieved by any final decision
of the planning commission may appeal to a court of record of the county, by filing
a petition, duly verified, setting forth that such decision is illegal, in whole
or in part, specifying the grounds of the illegality. Such petition shall be
presented to the court within thirty days (30) after the final decision of the
planning commission.
I
Sec. 12. Penalties, injunctions and other legal actions.
A violation of this chapter shall be deemed a misdemeanor and upon conviction
shall be subject to a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars or thirty days (30)
imprisonment for each violation or both.
The county engineer may apply to the Circuit Court of Roanoke County for
injunctive relief to enjoin a violation or a threatened violation of this chapter,
without the necessity of showing that there does not exist an adequate remedy at
law.
The county attorney shall, upon request of the county engineer take legal
action to enforce the provisions of this chapter.
Compliance with the provisions of this chapter shall be prima facie evidence
in any legal or equitable proceeding for damages caused by erosion, siltation or
sedimentation that all requirements of law have been met and the complaining party
must show negligence in order to recover any damages.
Sec. 13. Li abil i ty.
Neither the approval of an erosion and sediment control plan under the pro-
visions of this chapter, nor the compliance with the conditions of such plan shall
be deemed to relieve any person from responsibility for damage to other persons or
property nor shall such approval impose any liability upon the county for damage
to other persons or property.
I
This amendment shall take effect on June 10, 1976.
AYES:
NAYS:
On motion of Supervisor Seibel and adopted by the following recorded vote
Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
None
IN RE:
PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE QUESTION OF A SOIL EROSION
AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ORDINANCE
On the motion of Supervisor Dodson and the unanimous voice vote of the
Board, the following public hearings on the question of a Soil Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance were continued to the July 22, 1975 meeting of the Board, in orde
that the County Planning Commission may submit recommendations on same:
An ordinance amending Chapter 21, Zoning, of the Roanoke County Code
in relation to soil erosion and sediment control.
I
An ordinance amending certain sections of Chapter 17, Subdivisions,
of the Roanoke County Code in relation to soil erosion and sediment
contro 1 .
. "......,- .
~
---
6-10-75
..,.~(:) 5.
IN RE:
APPLICATION OF CHARLES D. ABSHER FOR A SPECIAL)
EXCEPTION TO PARK A MOBILE HOME ON A 5.9-ACRE) APPROVED
TRACT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ROUTE 624 )
Supervisor Hilton moved that the application of Charles D. Absher for a
special exception to park a mobile home on a 5.9-acre tract located on the south
side of Route 624, 1/2 mile west of Route 311 be approved subject to the provisions
I
of the County Zoning Ordinance as it pertains to mobile homes.
The motion was adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
NAYS: None
Mr. Absher was present at the hearing. There was no opposition.
IN RE:
APPLICATION OF WAYNE GAULDIN FOR A SPECIAL)
EXCEPTION TO PARK A MOBILE HOME ON A 5.7 )
ACRE TRACT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF )
ROUTE 624 )
APPROVED
Supervisor Hilton moved that the application of Wayne Gauldin for a
special exception to park a mobile home on a 5.7-acre tract located on the south
side of Route 624, 1/2 mile west of Route 311 be approved subject to the
provisions of the County Zoning Ordinance as it pertains to mobile homes.
The motion was adopted by the following recorded vote:
I
AYES: Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
NA YS: None
Mr. Gauldin was present at the hearing. There was no opposition.
IN RE:
APPLICATION OF DAVID L. DORSETT FOR A SPECIAL)
EXCEPTION TO PARK A MOBILE HOME ON AN 8 ACRE) APPROVED
TRACT LOCATED 0.3 MILE SOUTH OFF ROUTE 676 )
Supervisor Johnson moved that the application of David L. Dorsett for a
special exception to park a mobile home on an 8-acre tract located 0.3 mile south
off Route 676 on a private road near Wrights Siding be approved subject to the
provisions of the County Zoning Ordinance as it pertains to mobile homes.
The motion was adopted by the following recorded vote:
None
I
AYES:
NAYS:
Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
Mr. Dorsett was present at the hearing. There was no opposition.
6-10-75
'~
IN RE:
APPLICATION OF JAMES L.UNDERWOOD FOR A SPECIAL )
EXCEPTION TO PARK A MOBILE HOME ON A 16-ACRE TRACT) APPROVED
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ROUTE 221 )
Supervisor Johnson moved that the application of James L. Underwood for
a special exception to park a mobile home on a 16-acre tract located on the north
I
side of Route 221 about 1 1/2 miles west of Route 696 (Martin Creek Road) be
approved subject to the provisions of the County Zoning Ordinance as it pertains
to mobile homes.
The motion was adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
NAYS: None
Mr. Underwood was present at the hearing. There was no opposition.
IN RE:
APPLICATION OF MADGE B. TWINE FOR A SPECIAL
EXCEPTION TO PARK A MOBILE HOME ON A 21.25
ACRE TRACT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ROUTE
778 IN THE DIXIE CAVERNS AREA
APPROVED
Supervisor Hilton moved that the application of Madge B. Twine for a
I
special exception to park a mobile home on a 21.25-acre tract located on the north
side of Route 778, 1/2 mile west of Route 647 in the Dixie Caverns area be approved
effective July 16, 1975, subject to the provisions of the County Zoning Ordinance
as it pertains to mobile homes and a variance granted by the Board of Zoning Appeal .
The motion was adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
NAYS: None
IN RE:
APPLICATION OF DAN L. BECKNER FOR A SPECIAL )
EXCEPTION TO PARK A MOBILE HOME ON A 0.6- )
ACRE TRACT LOCATED OFF TEXAS HOLLOW ROAD )
CONTINUED
On the motion of Supervisor Dodson and the unanimous voice vote of the
Board, the public hearing on the application of Dan L. Beckner for a special
exception to park a mobile home on a O.6-acre tract located off Texas Hollow Road
on the west side of Route 913 was continued to the July 22, 1975 meeting of the
I
Board since the application was not present at the hearing.
\l'~
'''Io';~
6-10-75
:0 ~
IN RE:
PETITION OF O. S. AND FRANCES J. FERGUSON TO
VACATE A CUL DE SAC ON FERGUSON DRIVE AS
RECORDED ON THE MAP OF HOMELAND HILLS OF RECORD
IN PLAT BOOK 8, PAGE 60 IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE
OF THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR ROANOKE COUNTY
FINAL ORDER
WHEREAS, O. S. and Frances J. Ferguson petitioned the Board of Supervisor
particularly described in said petition be vacated and replaced by a new cul-de-sac
I
of Roanoke County requesting that a cul-de-sac hereinabove referred to and more
shown on the Map of Homeland Hills, Section II, of record in Plat Book 9, Page 18,
in the aforementioned Clerk's Office; and
WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission for its
recommendation; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due advertisement considered the
petition at a meeting held on the 15th day of April, 1975, and after hearing
evidence touching on the merits of the petition, is of the opinion that the
property hereinafter should be vacated and replaced as stated above.
WHEREAS, on this day a public hearing was held by the Board after
advertisement as required by law; and
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of said public hearing and after full con-
sideration of the matter, this Board is of the opinion that a vacation of that
I
cul-de-sac, shown on the plat in question, is proper.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED by the Board of Supervisors
that, pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the
cul-de-sac be permanently vacated, discontinued, closed and abandoned:
The cul-de-sac on the southwesterly terminus of Ferguson Drive
as shown on Map of Section 1, Homeland Hills recorded in Plat
Book 8, page 60, in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Roanoke County, Virginia.
The above order was adopted on motion of Supervisor Seibel and the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
NAYS: None
Mr. Michael S. Ferguson, Attorney, appeared on behalf of the petitioners.
I
There was no opposition.
6-10-75
3 (j:~
IN RE:
PETITION OF ROSEMARY HASH PETTIGREW, ET AL, )
FOR REZONING LOT 10 and 11, BLOCK 1, NORTH )
HILLS )
CONTINUED
I
On the motion of Supervisor Johnson and the unanimous voice vote of the
Board, the public hearing on the petition of Rosemary Hash Pettigrew, et al, for
rezoning Lot 10 and 11, Block 1, North Hills as recorded in the C1erk1s Office in
Roanoke County in Plat Book 3, Page 20 from R-1 to R-3 in order to develop a
townhouse project was continued to the July 22, 1975 meeting of the Board.
IN RE:
PROPOSED REZONING OF FOUR (4) PARCELS
OF LAND) CONTAINING 3048 ACRES, MORE
OR LESS, SITUATED IN A SOUTHWESTERLY
DIRECTION FROM PROFESSIONAL PARK OFFICE
BUILDING AND APPROXIMATELY 215 FEET
SOUTHWESTERLY FROM VIRGINIA SECONDARY
ROUTE NOo 904, SAID PARCEL ADJOINING THE
PROPERTY OF R. LQ ~~RTZ, ROBERT C. BELL~
MRS. Ro O. CUNNINGHAM, HOWARD S" AVERY,
TANGLEWOOD WEST, H. C. SAUL AND Ko Bo
GRAHAM, BUILDER, INCo, ALL LOCATED IN
THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT,
RO.."\.NOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA 0
I
AN ORDINANCE to amend the Zoning Ordinance of the
County of Roanoke to reclassify on the zoning map from "Resi-
dential District, R-3" to "Business District~ B-2" four (4) par-
cels of land located approximately two hundred and fifteen (215)
I
feet southwest from Virginia Secondary Route Noo 9040
WHEREAS, a petition by K. B. Graham, Builder, Inco, as
the legal owner and optionee, has been made to the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Roanoke to amend the Zoning Ordinance
of the County of Roanoke so as to reclassify on the zoning map
four (4) parcels of land as hereinafter mentioned from "Resi-
dential District R-3" to "Business District, B-2", and
WHEREAS, by resolution of this Board~ the petition was
referred to the Planning Commission of Roanoke County for a rec-
mmendation as required by the appropriate statutes and ordi-
ances; and
~. .
":..~"'" ~ i,..
_~t ,;Ar.!'
6-10-75
. \.~!(\ q
WHEREAS, after hearing evidence concerning same, the
I
Planning Commission by resolution adopted at its meeting on the
17th day of Decernber, 1974, recommended to this Board that the
ordinances be amended to rezone the property as reqvested by the
petition; and
WHEPillAS, a public hearing by this Board was scheduled
in the Salem-Roanoke Valley Civic Center, located in the City of
Salem, Virginia, at 7:00 o'clock pOmQ on the 10th day of June,
1975, after notice of intention to amend said ordinance at said
hearing was published once a week for two (2) successive weeks
in the World-Ne~s, a newspaper having general circulation in the
County of Roanoke, with the public hearing scheduled to be held
not less than five (5) nor more than twenty-one (21) days after
the final publications; and
I
WHEREAS, at the public hearing as aforesaid~ all
n::lr-
r --.
ties in interest and citizens were given an opportunity to be
heardj both for and against the proposed rezoning; and
WHEREAS, this Board, after due consideration of the
evidence heard, is of the opinion that the land should be rezoned
as prayed for by the petition and in accordance with the recom-
mendations made by the Planning Commissiono
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Super-
visors of the County of Roanok~, that the Zonhlg Ordinance of the
County of Roanoke be, and the same hereby is~ amended to re-
I
c las s ify on the Zoning Map of Roanoke County, Virginia, from liRe s i-'
dential R-3" to "Business District, B-2" as cefined by the ordi-
I
ns. ce, those parcels of land lying and being in the Coun ty of
6-10-75
.'.~~~.~
# .
Roanoke, Virginia, and more particularly described as follows,
to-v7it:
I
BEGINNING at a point in the middle of a 10 foot
roadway, said point being So 430 02' 02" ~o 230,,00
feet from Virginia Secondary Route Noo 904 (for-
merly Starkey Road) to corner 1, the point of
ACTUAL BEGINNING; and continuing with said roado:\!ay
along the property line of K~ B. Graham, Builder,
Inc., in a southeasterly direction, So 430 02~ 02"
Eo 225094 feet to corner 2, a point in said roadway;
thence continuing with K. Bo Graham, Builder, Inca,
S. 500 34' 42" Wo 9020 feet to corner 3, corner to
Howard So and Gwenda Ko Avery; thence with Avery's
line, So 410 25' 18" E. 10000 feet to corner 4;
thence continuing with Avery's line, No 500 34' 42"
Eo 20000 feet to corner 5; thence continuing with
Avery's line, S. 410 46' l81J Eo 10.00 feet to corner
6; thence continuing with Avery's line No 510 27'
42" E. 8000 feet to corner 7; thence continuing ~\7ith
Avery's line, S" 410 46J 1811 Eo 40000 feet to corner
8; thence a new line through the ~roperty of Howard
S. and G\-Jenda Ko Avery, So 480 34 42" Ho 153046
feet to a point, corner to the land of Tanglewood
West; thence continuing in the same direction a new
line through the land of Tanglewood West, So 480
34' 42" W. 362083 feet to corner 9, a point on the
southeastern boundary line of the land of T~ngle-
wood West, corner to property now or fonnerly owned
by Ho Co Saul; thence continuing with Saul in a
northwesterJy direction, N" {{-30 08 I 53" ~v 0 313059 feet
to corner 10; thence leaving Ho Co Saul's line, a
new line through the property of ~~~~lewood West in
a northeasterly direction, No 480 15 Eo 100000 feet
to corner 11, a point in a 60 inch {rain; thence
continuing through the land of Tang ewood West a
new line, No 520 29' 37" Eo ll5Q20 j ~et to a point
in the line of Ko Bo Graham, Builder Inc., thence
continuing ~'I7i th said line, a new linE through the
land of Ko Bo Graham, Builder, Inco, 285097 feet,
a total distance of 401017 feet to the place of
BEGINNING; containing 3049 acres more or less, ac-
cording to a Map of Survey dated June 4, 1975, by
Buford T. Lumsden & AssOCiates, PoCo, Certified
Land Surveyorso
I
BE IT FINALLY ORDAINED the Clerk of this Board forthvJith
attest two (2) true copies of this Ordinance and respectively de-
liver them to the Sec~etary of the Planning Commission of Roanoke
County and to Burton L. Albert, counsel for the petitionero
I
The above ordinance was adopted on motion of Supervisor
-iLohnson
, -s-ee-e~-y--Stl-pei::>-\ri:-&Jr----
and the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Mr. D::xison, Me Hilton, Mrs. lJohnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
NAYS: None
6-10-75
'SIl'
ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1260 N1ENDING THE
ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY rrHE--ADDITION OF A NEH
CHAPTER NUMBERED 8.2 AND ENTITLED FIRE PROTECTION.
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors deems certain amendments to
the Roanoke County Code to be necessary in the best interests of the
health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of Roanoke County;
I
and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Intention to amend the Roanoke County Code
as proposed, and Public Hearing thereon, have been advertised and
posted in accordance with law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, that the Roanoke County Code be amended as follows:
CHAPTER 8.2
Fire Protection
Article I. Fire Lanes,
Requirements, Signs, Enforcement
Sec. 1. Designation
The Fire Marshal shall designate fire lanes on public streets,
roads, or private property used for commercial, industrial or educa-
tional purposes as follows:
I
A. Fire lanes shall be established for the purpose of
regulating parking in front of or adjacent to fire hydrants,
and for access by fire fighting equipment.
B~ Marking and approved signs to designate such lanes
shall be provided by the owner or agents of the property
involved, under guidelines established by the Fire Marshal.
C. The following policy shall apply where fire hydrants
are located:
1. Where hydrants are located at or close to the
curb line, or edge of the road, and face on the
public street, a public parking lot or a private
road open to the public, parking within 15 feet
is prohibited.
2. A special curb marking designating areas
established pursuant to (1) above, shall be
required; such curb or road marking to be yellow.
I
3. No person shall use, tamper with, damage or
destroy any fire hydrant, valves or lvater distribu-
tion mains, except that a~y legally constituted'fire
department may use such hydrants for fire fighting
or training purposes.
6-10-75
3.12
4. No planting or erection or other obstructions
shall be allowed within 4 feet of any hydrant.
I
D. The following policy shall apply where fire lanes are
established:
1. A fire lane shall be designated where, in the
opinion of the Fire Marshal, it is desirable that
certain roads, areas and building access and egress
facilities be kept clear for fire department and
ambulance emergency equipment and other equipment
provided far fire protection, Approved signs only
shall be used to designate such fire lanes and they
shall be provided by the owner or his agent as the
same may be required by the Fire Marshal.
2. Signs, as required, shall be as follows:
a. !vIetal construction, 1211 by 18".
b. Red letters on white background with
3/8" red trim strip around entire outer edge
of sign.
c. Lettering to be "No Parking or Standing-
Fire Lane".
I
d. Arrows on signs to point and indicate area
designated.
e. Lettering size as follows:
No parking
2"
or
Standing
Fire Lane
Arrows -
Directional
1"
2"
1" solid
Spacing between words to be uniform.
f. Posts for signs where required, shall be
metal and securely mounted, and shall be painted
fluorescent yellow.
ec. 2. Enforcement.
Parking or otherwise obstructing such fire lanes in any manner
s hereby prohibited. The Fire Marshal or any law enforcement office]
f the County may enforce the provisions of this Chapter.
ec. 3. Penalties.
I
The penalty for any violation of this Chapter shall be considere
misdemeanor and shall be punishable by a fine in the amount of Ten
ollars, ($10.00). And in addition thereto, any motor vehicle parked
n violation of this section may be moved to a garage or parking lot
or storage at the expense of the owner of the motor vehicle.
The Fire Marshal shall prepare an appropriate ticket and ticket
tub for use in enforcing this section. The Fire Marshal or any law
nforcement officer charged with enforcing this section shall attach,
'n plain view, to any vehicle parked in violation of this section, a
icket notifying the owner or operator thereof that such vehicle has
een parked in violation of a provision of this section and illstructirg
uch owner or operator when and where to report with reference to the I
iolation. The time of the violation shall be noted on the ticket I
nd stub. The ticket shall be turned in to the County's Treasurer's
~
6-10-75
Sl .5\
Office. Both the ticket and stub shall have the corresponding numbe""s.
The ticket shall contain the following statement:
"NOTICE: You may pay this by appearing in the Treasurer's Offi""e
of Roanoke County, First Floor, Roanoke County Courthouse, Salem,
Virginia, between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday through
Friday. If you prefer, you may mail the ticket and fine to the
Treasurer's Office at the aforesaid address. Checks should be made
payable to the Treasurer, Roanoke County. If you fail to take care
of this ticket within 72 hours, then further action will be taken
which could result in your having to appear in court and paying addi
tional costs."
I
Each such owner or operator may, within the aforesaid 72 hours
of the time when such notice was attached to such vehicle, voluntari y
appear in the Treasurer's Office of this County duripg regular worki 9
hours and waive his right to be formally tried for such offense by
paying at such place the appropriate fine as penalty for and in full
satisfaction of such violation.
If the owner or operator of the motor vehicle in question
does not appear in the Treasurer's Office of this County and pay
the fine within 72 hours of the time of the offense as noted on
the ticket and stub, then the County Attorney shall, in compliance
with ~46.1-179.01 of the Code of Virginia, notify the owner or
operator of the vehicle in question by mail at his last known
address or his address as shown on the records of the Division of
Motor Vehicles, that he may pay the fine, provided by this section
for such violation, plus a penalty in the sum of FIVE DOLLARS, withir
five days of the receipt of the notice, at the Treasurer's Office
of this County. If the owner or operator has failed to pay such
fine within such time, the Fire Marshal or law enforcement officer
issuing the original ticket shall then issue a summons for the
offense; but the owner or operator of the vehicle in question may
pay the fine prior to the date he is to appear in court provided
he also pays necessary costs. All fines paid under this section
shall be payable to the Treasurer's Office of this County, and that
office shall keep appropriate records thereof.
I
This amendment to take effect on September I, 1975.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson and adopted by the following
recorded vote:
AYES:
Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
NAYS:
Mr. Hilton
ABSENT:
Mr. Dodson
I
.'
6-10-75
:3..1,4
IN RE:
RESOLUTION NO. 1261 ENDORSING THE PLAN TO
IMPROVE THE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the acting project director of the Roanoke Valley Regional
Health Services Planning Council, Inc. has requested that the Board of Supervisors
endorse the application for Federal funds under the Emergency Medical Assistance
I
Act of 1973 to improve the emergency medical services system in Planning Districts
4 and 5 of Virginia; and
WHEREAS, said acting project director has advised that no request is
being made for local funds, the local in-kind match being provided by local
governments, hospitals and volunteers; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors desires to endorse the program as
being of benefit to the citizens of Roanoke County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County that said Board hereby endorses the application for Federal funds under the
Emergency Medical Assistance Act of 1973 to improve the emergency medical services i
!
systems in Planning Districts 4 and 5 in Virginia. !
On motion of Supervisor Seibel and adopted by the following recorded vote:
I
AYES:
NAYS:
Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
None
ABSENT: Mr. Dodson
IN RE: RESOLUTION NO. 1262 DIRECTING THE APPLICATION OF
DONALD F. THOMPSON AND MAURY L. STRAUSS BE SENT
TO THE ROANOKE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY
FOR A RECOMMENDATION TO THIS BOARD
WHEREAS, Dona 1 d F. Thompson and Maury L. Strauss di d on June 5, 1975,
apply to this Board for permission to operate a public service water corporation
in Roanoke County, said corporation to be known as Longridge Water Corp; and
WHEREAS, this Board is of the opinion that its application should be
sent to the Roanoke County Public Service Authority for a recommedation to this
Boa rd.
I
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board does direct that the
application of Donald F. Thompson and Maury L. Strauss for permission to operate a
public service water corporation, to be known as Longridge Water Corp., be sent
to the Roanoke County Public Service Authority.
,~
6-10-75
'YS15
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Public Service Authority
is directed to investigate this application and within 30 days deliver to this
Board a recommendation of either approval or disapproval of the proposed applicatior .
On motion of Supervisor Johnson and adopted by the following recorded
AYES:
Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
I
vote:
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Mr. Dodson
On the motion of Supervisor Hilton and the unanimous voice vote of the
members present, the Audit of the General District Court for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 1974, as preapred by the Auditor of Public Accounts was this date received
and fil ed.
IN RE:
ITEMS REFERRED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
On the motion of Supervisor Hilton and the unanimous voice vote of the
members present, the following petitions were this date received, filed and referre(
to the Planning Commission for its recommendation:
Petition of John Walton for rezoning of an 0.8-acre tract located
on the south side of Route 24 near the Blue Ridge Parkway from R-l
to B-2 so that a drapier shop may be operated thereon.
I
Petition of Charles Wesley and Emma Evelyn Myers and Anita Virginia
Myers Cranford for rezoning 7 acres of land located on the north side
of State Route 720 (Colonial Avenue), west of Route 419 from R-l to
RE for use by North Cross School.
Petition of Brabham Petroleum Company for rezoning a portion of the
undeveloped acreage known as the north part of Lot 6, Map No. 3 of
Lindenwood located on the south side of Route 24 from R-2 to B-2 in
order that a convenience store may be operated thereon and the
issuance of a special exception for the installation of self-service
gasoline pumps in connection with the operation of said convenience
s to re .
IN RE:
RESOLUTION NO. 1263 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF
AN AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH BALZER &
ASSOC IA TES, I NC.
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has heretofore entered into an agree-
ment dated February 12, 1974, with Balzer & Associates, Inc. which agreement pro-
vides that said firm shall perform certain tasks in the preparation of a
comprehensive plan for Roanoke County and the implementation of ordinances relating
I
thereto; and
,~(:...i
6-10-75
316
WHEREAS, said firm has completed a portion of said comprehensive plan
and has thereafter indicated that a re-evaluation of portions of said plan should
be undertaken as a result of the recent annexation of a portion of Roanoke County;
and
I
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors is of opinion that said re-evaluation,
together with certain additional steps, should be undertaken in order to provide
Roanoke County with the best possible comprehensive master plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County that the Chairman and the Clerk be, and they are hereby authorized and
directed to enter into an agreement with Balzer & Associates, Inc., at a total
cos t to the County not to exceed Forty-Si x Thousand Fi ve Hundred Doll ars
($46,500), said consideration to be paid on a per diem basis; said consultants to
perform the following work within six months from the date of execution of the
agreement:
1. Revision of the interim land use plan showing five to eight years
I
of growth for the area of Roanoke County after annexation.
2. Review of all elements of the Roanoke County comprehensive plan
previously adopted by the Board of Supervisors in light of the recent annexation
decision.
3. Revision of the financial resources analysis in consideration of
the annexation decision.
4. Preparation of an official zoning map for Roanoke County.
5. Meeting with the Board of Supervisors and the Planning Commission in
order to present the work encompassed in said agreement and attendance at all
public hearings thereon.
On motion of Supervisor Hilton and adopted by the following recorded
vote:
AYES: Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
I
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Mr. Dodson
,.
6-10-75
.,~ 17
IN RE:
RESOLUTION NO. 1264 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION
OF AN AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE REMOVAL OF HAY
ON THE NORTH COUNTY PARK PROPERTY
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has recently purchased a tract of land
in the northern portion of the County for use as a park site; and
WHEREAS, prior to the County's acquisition of the property, Mr. Tracie W.
Nichols had arrangements with the former property owners under which he removed hay
I
from certain portions of the property; and
WHEREAS, the County Administrator has recommended that an agreement be
entered into with Mr. Nichols providing for the County to receive one-third of all
the hay farmed on said property by Mr. Nichols, in which recommendation the Board
concurs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County that the County Administrator be, and he is hereby authorized and directed
to enter into an agreement with Mr. Tracie W. Nichols, providing the terms and
conditions under which Mr. Nichols may farm the hay on the property previously
acquired by the Board of Supervisors for use as a park in the northern portion of
the County; said agreement to be in a form approved by the County Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson and adopted by the following recorded
I
vote:
AYES: Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Mr. Dodson
IN RE: EMPLOYEE GROUP HOSPITALIZATION AND MEDICAL INSURANCE
On the motion of Supervisor Seibel and the unanimous voice vote of the
members present, the Board approved the report of the County Administrator regard-
ing employee group hospitalization and medical insurance and his recommendation
that the County continue with its current contract throughout the current calendar
year with the intent of further analysing the situation.
I
6-10-75
3
IN RE:
RESOLUTION NO. 1265 AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE
OF MOBILE RADIOS
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has included funds in the 1975-76
I
fiscal year budget for the purchase of mobile radios to be installed in new
automobiles obtained for use by the Sheriff's Department; and
WHEREAS, the County Finance Department received quotations from manu-
facturers of said equipment in order to compare the prices offered by said
manufacturers with that offered by the State Department of Purchases and Supply,
which quotations indicated that it would be to the advantage of Roanoke County
to purchase said equipment through the State Department of Purchases and Supply; an
WHEREAS, the County Administrator has in his report dated June 10, 1975
recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize an order to be placed with the
State Department of Purchases and Supply for said mobile radios, in which
recommendation the Board concurs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County that said Board hereby authorizes the County Administrator to place an
I
order with the State Department of Purchases and Supply for twenty-five mobile
radios at a unit price of $949.00, funds for the purchase of said mobile radios
being included in the 1975-76 fiscal year budget.
On motion of Supervisor Seibel and adopted by the following recorded
vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
IIN RE:
\
Mr. Dodson, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
Mr. Hilton
RESOLUTION NO. 1266 ACCEPTING A BID FOR THE
COUNTY'S GENERAL INSURANCE PROGRAM FOR THE
PERIOD JULY 1, 1975 THROUGH JUNE 30, 1976
WHEREAS, bids were received and opened in the office of the County
Administrator on May 30, 1975, for a package insurance program for Roanoke County
according to specifications prepared by the insurance committee; and
I
WHEREAS, the County Administrator, in his report dated June 10, 1975, has
. recommended that the bid of Securities Insurance Corporation be accepted.
!
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County that the bid of Securities Insurance Corporation to provide an insurance
program for Roanoke County for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1975 and ending
June 30, 1976, in the amount of $62,015, which includes an umbrella premium in the
amount of $2 Million, be, and the same is hereby accepted; said bid being the low-
est and best bid received fully meeting the County's specifications.
, i.:.l"'j,
...~~....
6-10-75
r~ll: 9
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator is authorized and
directed to enter into a contract for said insurance; said contract to be in a form
approved by the County Attorney.
AYES: Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Flora
ABSTAINING:
Mr. Seibel
I
NAYS: None
IN RE:
AMENDMENT TO GENERAL APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE NO 1267
On motion of Supervisor Hilton, the General Appropriation Ordinance of
Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 25, 1974, be, and the same is hereby amended
as follows to become effective June 10, 1975:
306a - Policing and Investigating
411 - Replacement of Vehicles: An additional appropriation of $73,663 is
hereby made from the General Operating Fund for the period ending
June 30, 1975 for the function and purpose hereinabove indicated.
Adopted by the following recorded vote:
Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
AYES:
NAYS:
None
At 8:50 p.m., on the motion of Supervisor Dodson and the unanimous voice
I
vote of the Board, the Supervisors went into Executive Session to discuss matters
involving real estate and litigation.
At 9:55 p.m., the Supervisors returned to the Civic Center and on the
motion of Supervisor Hilton and the unanimous voice vote of the members, the Board
reconvened in open session.
IN RE:
ANNEXATION
On the motion of Supervisor Johnson and the unanimous voice vote of the
Board, the County's annexation attorneys were authorized to take whatever steps
are necessary in order to protect the County's interest in the annexation
proceedings.
I
6-10-75
120.
IN RE:
REGIONAL LANDFILL AGREEMENT
Supervisor Dodson moved that the Board approve the agreement as proposed
by the City of Salem with an amendment to include within the definition of landfill
the term transfer station and also changing the name of the Board to the Roanoke
I
Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor Hilton and adopted by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Flora
NAYS: None
ABSTAINING: Mr. Seibel
IN RE:
REGIONAL LANDFILL AGREEMENT
Supervisor Dodson moved that the Board approve a three-party agreement
between the City of Salem, the Town of Vinton and the County of Roanoke based
upon the same language contained in the original City of Roanoke's agreement which I
,
does not include the term transfer stations within the definition of landfill but
does provide for the possibility of more than one landfill site. The other change
I
from the original City of Roanoke agreement being that the percentages are 63% for
Roanoke City, 32% for Roanoke County and 5% for the Town of Vinton.
IAYEs:
NAYS:
The motion was adopted by the following recorded vote:
Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
None
IN RE:
REGIONAL LANDFILL AGREEMENT
Supervisor Johnson moved that the Board approve execution of the
agreement as presented by the City of Roanoke with only one basic change, that
being the changing of percentages to indicate post annexation population.
The motion was adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mr. Dodson, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Flora
None
I
ABSTAINING: Mr. Hilton, Mr. Seibel
~
6-10-75
~21
...
IN RE:
COUNTY PAYROLLS
On the motion of Supervisor Hilton and the following recorded vote, the
County Payrolls (Semi-monthly 5/30/75) and (Bi-weekly 6/6/75) were approved for
payment in the gross amount of $113,475.9] from which the sum of $12,583.83 F.I.T.,
$2,873.20 State Tax, $6,585.85 F.I.C.A., $2,478.51 Blue Cross, $3,600.30 VSRS,
$508.50 L.I., $419.25 ACC, $309.96 T.P., $133.05 A.F., $150.04 S.B., $1,008.76 C.U.,
I
$64.25 U.F., $258.69 Misc., are deducted leaving a net payroll of $54,763.58.
AYES:
NAYS:
Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
None
IN RE:
AMENDMENT TO GENERAL APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE NO. 1268
On motion of Supervisor Seibel, the General Appropriation Ordinance of
Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 25, 1974, be, and the same is hereby
amended as follows to become effective June 10, 1975:
EXPENDITURES
3l8d - Annexation
103 - Professional Services: An additional appropriation of $52,000 is
hereby made from the General Operating Fund for the period ending
June 30, 1975, for the function and purpose hereinabove indicated.
AYES:
Adopted by the following recorded vote:
Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
I
NAYS:
None
IN RE:
ACCOUNTS FOR PAYMENT
On the motion of Supervisor Hilton and the following recorded vote, the
current bills totaling $186,874.37 and the bills paid since last Board meeting
totaling $19,422.80 were today approved presently and retroactively.
AYES: Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Flora
NAYS: None
ABSTAINING: Mr. Seibel
I
6-10-75
- .~
IN RE:
PAYMENT OF VENDORS
Supervisor Johnson moved that the Board concur in permitting the Finance
Department to pay claims against the County in accordance with the current budget
during the period from June 10, 1975 through July 21,1975.
I
The motion was adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
NAYS: None
The report on Delinquent Accounts for the month of May, 1975 as submitted
by the Finance Officer was received by the Board.
IN RE:
AMENDMENT TO GENERAL APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE NO. 1269
On motion of Supervisor Seibel, the General Appropriation Ordinance of
Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 25, 1974, be, and the same is hereby amended
as follows to become effective June 10, 1975:
EXPENDITURES
1100 - Air Pollution Control Fund
I
902 - Repayment of Loan (from General Operating Fund): An additional
appropriation of $22,000 is hereby made from the Air Pollution
Control Fund for the period ending June 30, 1975, for the function
and purpose hereinabove indicated.
REVENUES
1100 - Air Pollution Control Fund
1104 - Loan to be Repaid (General Operating Fund): An additional estimate
of $22,000 is hereby made to the Air Pollution Control Fund for the
period ending June 30, 1975, for the function and purpose hereinabove
indicated.
Adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
None
IN RE:
AMENDMENT TO GENERAL APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE NO. 1270
On motion of Supervisor Seibel, the General Appropriation Ordinance of
I
Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 25, 1975, be, and the same is hereby amended
as follows to become effective June 10, 1975:
EXPENDITURES
3l8b - Reimbursable Accounts (General Operating Fund)
902L - Loan to Air Pollution Control Fund: An additional appropriation of
$22,000 is hereby made from the General Operating Fund for the period
ending June 30, 1975 for the function and purpose hereinabove
indicated.
,..
6-10-75
..:3 '~1S
REVENUES
3030 - Non-Revenue Accounts (General Operating Fund)
1133 - Repayment of Loan (from Air Pollution Control Fund): An additional
estimate of $22,000 is hereby made to the General Operating Fund
for the period ending June 30, 1975, for the function and purpose
hereinabove indicated.
Adopted by the following recorded vote:
I
Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
AYES:
NAYS:
None
IN RE:
AMENDMENT TO GENERAL APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE NO. 1271
On motion of Supervisor Seibel, the General Appropriation Ordinance of
Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 25, 1974, be, and the same is hereby amended
as follows to become effective June 10, 1975:
EXPENDITURES
30 - General Operating Fund (additional appropriations)
302b - Appraisers and Assessors
100 Salaries
Increase
14,000
319 Office Supplies
100
2,000
399 Miscellaneous
305a - Circuit Court
100 Salaries 1,785
3l1a - Advancement of Agricultural and
Home Economics
399 Refund to Salem-Overpayment 297
3l8a - Reimbursable Accounts
901 FWH Payment Account 96,000
998 Miscellaneous Reimbursables 20,000
3l8f - Miscellaneous Operating Functions
299a Option on Land 2,508
299b Appraisal of Land
350
Remarks
Salary of Board of Equalization
for remainder of year.
Needed for remainder of year.
I
Needed for leased auto & office
equipment
Clerk Steno employed for
porti on of year
Needed for refund to Salem for
overpayment of Service Contract
for Fiscal Year 1973-74
Will reflect in revenues used
for internal accounting purpose
only
Will reflect in revenue itmes
covered by insurance or refunds
used for internal accounting
purposes only
Not eligible for Revenue Sharint
Fund
I
Not eligible for Revenue Sharin
Fund
6-10-75
REVENUES
3030 - Non-Revenue Accounts
0916 FWH Repayment Account
96,000 Reflected in Reimbursable Account
0999 Miscellaneous Refunds
20,000 Reflected in Reimbursable Account
Adopted by the following recorded vote:
I
AYES:
NAYS:
Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
None
IN RE:
AMENDMENT TO GENERAL APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE NO. 1272
On motion of Supervisor Seibel, the General Appropriation Ordinance of
Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 25, 1974, be, and the same is hereby
amended as follows to become effective June 10, 1975:
EXPENDITURES
I
1700 - School Operating Fund
17b1 - Instruction: An additional appropriation of $1,862,980 is hereby
made from the School Operating Fund for the period ending June 30,
1975 for the function and purpose hereinabove indicated.
17b2 - Other Instructional Cost: An additional appropriation of $11,042 is
hereby made from the School Operating Fund for the period ending
June 30, 1975 for the function and purpose hereinabove indicated.
17dl - Transportation: An additional appropriation of $68,580 is hereby
made from the School Operating Fund for the period ending June 30,
1975 for the function and purpose hereinabove indicated.
REVENUES
1700 - School Operating Fund
1710-0917 - School Service Operation (from Salem): An additional estimate
of $383,724 is hereby made to the School Operating Fund for
the period ending June 30, 1975 for the function and purpose
hereinabove indicated.
1790-1102 - Transfer from General Operating Fund: An additional estimate of
$1,558,878 is hereby made to the School Operating Fund for the
period ending June 30, 1975, for the function and purpose
hereinabove indicated.
Adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
NAYS: None
I
IN RE:
AMENDMENT TO GENERAL APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE NO. 1273
On motion of Supervisor Seibel, the General Appropriation Ordinance of
Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 25, 1974, be and the same is hereby amended
as follows to become effective June 10, 1975:
4]...,..
. \: t-
6-10-75
I
1'8.:2"5,
317a - Schools
901 - Transfer to School Operating Fund: In anticipation of future revenues
an additional appropriation of $1,558,878 is hereby made from the
General Operating Fund for the period ending June 30, 1975 for the
function and purpose hereinabove indicated.
Adopted by the following recorded vote:
None
I
AYES:
NAYS:
Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
IN RE:
Amendment to General Appropriation Ordinance No. 1274
On motion of Supervisor Seibel, the General Appropriation Ordinance of
Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 25, 1974, be, and the same is hereby amended
as follows to become effective June 10, 1975:
EXPENDITURES
1400 - Federal Revenue Sharing Fund
The following appropriations shall be adjusted for the Federal Revenue
Sharing Fund for the period ending June 30, 1975:
ACCT DESCRIPTION ORIGINAL APP. OTHER APP. FOR FY
NO APP. APPLICABLE TO ADJUSTMENT 1974-75
FY 1973-74
III Personnel Physicals 24,000 (20,325) -0- 3,675 I
200 Advertising 500 (69) -0- 431
217 Rent of Landfill Equip.
(73-74) 20,000 (20,000) -0- -0-
2l7a Rent of Landfill Equip.
( 74- 75 ) 38,000 -0- 3,986 41,986
401 Purchase of Fire
Apparatus 21,544 (21,544) -0- -0-
600 Purchase of Land(Hollins) 6,020 (6,020) -0- -0-
600b Property Option 2,508 -0- (2,508) -0-
60la Improvement of Mt Pleas
P.S. Bldg. 16,300 (147) (6,181) 9,972
60lb Glenvar Ballfield 5,000 (2,045) -0- 2,955
605 Comprehensive Master
Plan 122,500 (32,960) -0- 89,540
606 Water System Study 65,000 (2,295) -0- 62,705
610 Landfill Development 10,441 (6,455) (3,986) -0-
TOTAL (111,860)
REVENUES
1400 - Federal Revenue Sharing Fund
The following revenue estimated shall be adjusted for the Federal Revenue
Sharing Fund for the period ending June 30, 1975:
ACCT DESCRIPTION ORIGINAL EST. EST. FOR FY I
NO EST. APPLICABLE TO 1974-75
FY 1973-74
0000 Beginning Balance 923,732 (111,860) 811,872
Adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
NAYS:
None
6-10-75
Appropriation Ordinance Number 1275
l,.;
I..
Be It Resolved by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia,
hat the following appropriations are hereby made from the respective funds for the
eriod ending June 30, 1976, for the functions or purposes indicated:
Fund (30):
I
301 - County Administration:
301A-Board of Supervisors
301B-County Administrator
30lD-Finance Department
301F-County Attorney
302 - Assessment of Taxable Property:
302A-Commissioner of the Revenue
302B-Appraisers and Assessors
303 - Collection and Disbursement of Taxes and
Other Receipts:
303A-Treasurer
304 - Recording of Documents:
304A-C1erk of the Circuit Court
305 - Administration of Justice:
305A-Circuit Court
305B-Genera1 District Court
305C-Commonwealth's Attorney
305D-Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court
305E-Magistrates
306 - Crime Prevention and Detection:
306A-Policing & Investigation
306B-Confinement and Care of Prisoners
306C-Highway Safety Commission
306D-Communications
307 - Fire Prevention and Extinction:
307A-Fire Department
308 - Public Welfare:
308A-Board of Public Welfare
308C-Welfare Appropriation
308D-Institutional Care
308E-Lunacy Commissions
309 - Public Health:
309A-Health Department
310 - Public Works:
310A-Engineering Department
310B-Inspections
310E-Planning & Zoning
310G-Garbage Disposal
310I-Air Pollution Control
311 - Advancement of Agriculture and Home Economics:
311A-Extension & Continuing Education
312 - Protection of Livestock, Fowls, and Other
Property:
312A-Anima1 Control
313 - Elections:
313A-E1ections
314 - Maintenance of Buildings and Grounds:
314A-Maintenance of Buildings and Grounds
315 - Highways, Roads, and Street Lighting:
315A-Street Lighting
317 - Schools:
317A-Schools-Loca1 Appropriations
318 - Miscellaneous Operating Functions:
318A-Library-Local Operation
318B-Reimbursab1e Expenditures
318C-Employees Retirement and Benefits
318E-Parks and Recreation
318F-Miscellaneous Operating Functions
318G-Office of Emergency Services
318I-Contribution to Service Organizations
320 - Debt Service:
320A-Debt Retirement
399 - Contingent Balance:
399A-Unappropriated Balance
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
I
I
$ 42,678
43,736
194,254
31,907
69,216
76,282
90,917
34,043
90,344
12;638
84,915
156,491 i
2,200 I
I
1,036,866
129,433 I
500 I
129,682
448,706 I
1,800
2,640,754
48,500
1, 700
137,210
66,116
93,520
41,340
1,139,309
15,154
33,083
41, 368
49,609
372,583
55,000
12,021,456
385,229
505,400
371,078
340,584
15,000
10,794
177,355
150,002
389,579
$21,778,~3l
6-10-75
Revenue Sharing Fund (14):
1400-901 - Transfer to General Operating Fund:
A-Sa1aries-Garbage Disposal
B-Equipment-Garbage Disposal (New)
C-Equipment-Garbage Disposal (Replacement)
D-Sa1aries-Fire Department
1400-999 - Contingent Balance:
999A-Unappropriated Balance
999B-To Be Reappropriated
TOTAL REVENUE SHARING
ir inia Public Assistance Fund (12):
1200 - Administrative
1210 - Public Assistance
~
TOTAL VIRGINIA PUBLIC ASSISTANCE
~
~}
r Pollution Control Fund (11):
1100 - Air Pollution Control Department
t
t
~
i>
Fund (13):
~.
.~
i~
[~
~,
f
:-;~
Fund (17):
1700 - School Operating Functions
choo1 Central Cafeteria Fund (22):
{:'
~\
.f,',!
/;
~,
2200 - Cafeteria Expenditures
~;
p,1
s~
choo1 Federal Pro ram Funds (25):
2500 - Federal Program Expenditures
choo1 Textbook Fund (86):
8600 - Textbook Expenditures
t
1
~
!
choo1 Construction Fund (49):
.x
f
~
~-
~.
4900 - Proposed Bond Expenditures
Bond Construction (43):
t.
4300 - Proposed Bond Expenditures
f
PIa round Facilities Bond Fund (45):
4500 - Proposed Bond Expenditures
Sewer Bond Fund (47):
4700 - Proposed Bond Expenditures
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
$
700,000
100,000
40,000
160,000
691,802
459.515
G90,856
1.949.898
50,474
411,229
28,281,629
2,190,000
487,800
273,632
6,036,675
130,000
235,000
14,400
$ 2,151,317
I
2,640,754
50,474
411,229
28,281,629
I
2,190,000
487,800
273,632
6,036,675
130,000
I
235,000
14,400
$64.681.241
6-10-75
-
32
made from the General Operating Fund for the period covered by this appropriation
Be it Further Resolved that the Treasurer be, and he hereby is, authorizet
to transfer to other funds from the General Operating Fund from time to time as I
I
I
I
I
I
ordinance as amended from time to time by the Board of Supervisors. A copy of thiS!
I
ordinance is ordered to be certified to Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer and George F.,
!
I
Adopted by the following recorded vote to become effective July 1, 1975: I.'
Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
I
I
i
Ferrell, Finance Officer for the County of Roanoke.
monies become available sums equal to, but not in excess of, the appropriation
I
AYES:
NAYS:
None
IN RE:
AMENDMENT TO GENERAL APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE NO. 1276
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, the General Appropriation Ordinance of
Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 10, 1975, be, and the same is hereby amended
as follows to become effective July 1,1975:
EXPENDITURES
I
318i - Contribution to Service Organizations
702e - Mental Health Services: An additional appropriation of $15,000 is
hereby made from the General Operating Fund for the period ending
June 30, 1976, for the function and purpose hereinabove indicated.
Adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mr. Dodson, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
Mr. Hil ton
IN RE:
AMENDMENT TO GENERAL APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE NO. 1277
On motion of Supervisor Seibel, the General Appropriation Ordinance of
Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 10, 1975, be, and the same is hereby amended
as follows to become effective July 1, 1975:
EXPENDITURES
I
306a - Policing and Investigating
411 - Replacement of Vehicles: A deletion of $73,663 is hereby authorized
from the General Operating Fund for the period ending June 30, 1976,
for the function and purpose hereinabove indicated.
REVENUES
3099 - Beginning Balance
0001 - Beginning Balance - July 1, 1975: An additional estimate of $73,663
is hereby made to the General Operating Fund for the period ending
June 30, 1976, for the function and purpose hereinabove indicated.
Adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
NAYS: None
-
, ' Y!l .'9, .q ,
.
IN RE:
6-10-75
RESOLUTION NO. 1278 ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE
ROANOKE COUNTY CLASSIFICATION AND PAY PLAN
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County has heretofore
adopted a position classification and pay plan for Roanoke County, which plan
describes the procedure to be followed in incorporating amendments to said plan; anc
I
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors, in adopting the budget for the
1975-1976 fiscal year, included in said budget certain amendments to the pay plan;
and
WHEREAS, the Board desires to incorporate said changes into the pay plan
heretofore adopted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County that the following changes be, and they are hereby adopted as changes to the
position classification and pay plan heretofore adopted by the Board of Supervisors:
1. That the salary schedule attached hereto and identified as
Attachment "A" be, and it is hereby adopted as the salary schedule for the 1975-
1976 fiscal year; said salary scale including the State salary scale and law
enforcement and correctional officers.
2. That the following positions be, and they are hereby established
I
and adopted together with the job descriptions as set out in Attachment "B"
hereto, the job codes for said positions to be as follows:
CODE CLASS TITLE
GRADE
44
59
60
61
64
217
228
302
720
743
862
Purchasing
Supervisor
32
Real Estate
Technician
25
28
33
Appraiser I
Appraiser II
Supervisor of
Assessments
39
Right-of-way
Technician
25
39
31
22
Planner
Probation Officer II
Meter Reader
Engineering Assistant 29
Fire Inspector
E
D
A
C
D
B
10464 10968 11496 12024 12600 13224
7560 7896 8280 8664 9096 9528
8664 9096 9528 9984 10464 10968
10968 11496 12024 12600 13224 13848
14520 15216 15960 16728 17544 18384
27
7560 7896 8280 8664 9096 9528
14520 15216 15960 16728 17544 18384
9984 10464 10968 11496 12024 12600
6600 6912 7224 7560 7896 8280
9096 9528 9984 10464 10968 11496
8280 8664 9096 9528 9984 10464
I
6-10-75
. --- ---,
3. That the position of Appraiser be deleted from the reclassification and
pay plan.
4. That the following classifications be reclassified to the grades set
out as fo 11 ows:
I
CODE
45
55
57
58
660
710
715
735
770
I
815
850
860
865
870
CLASS TITLE
GRADE
33
27
21
A
B
C
E
F
Asst. Finance Officer
Business License Inspector
Dispatcher
Chief Communication
Dispatcher
25
25
29
23
o
Maintenance Foreman I
Electrician
Water Plant Operator
Utilities Maintenance
Mechanic
23
10968 11496 12024 12600 13244 13848
8280 8664 9096 9528 9984 10464
6312 6600 6912 7224 7560 7896
7560 7896 8280 8664 9096 9528
7560 7896 8280. 8664 9096 9528
9096 9528 9984 10464 10968 11496
6912 7224 7560 7896 8280 8664
6912 7224 7560 7896 8280 8664
Asst. Director of
Util ities
33 10968 11496 12024 12600 13224 13848
hereto as Attachment 11011:
Ja i1 er
S-27 Follows State supplemental scale
Asst. Animal Control
Officer
24
26
29
Fireman
Fire Captain
7224 7560 7896 8280 8664 9096
7896 8280 8664 9096 9528 9984
9096 9528 9984 10464 10968 11496
33 10968 11496 12024 12600 13224 13848
Fire Coordinator
5. That the Schematic List of Classes attached hereto as Attachment lie'
and the same is hereby adopted.
6. That the job description for the following classifications be adopted
in lieu of the existing job descriptions, said job descriptions being attached
I
CODE
IV-27
IV-42
IV-60
IV-680
IV-750
IV-770
NAME
Clerk Stenographer III
Account Clerk III
Appraiser I
Public Works Superintendent
Utilities Superintendent
Assistant Director of Utilities - Operation
and maintenance
t If , # .
, ~h,
6-10-75
I", Q 1
IV-775
IV-865
Director of Utilities
Fire Captain
On motion of Supervisor Johnson and adopted by the following recorded
vote:
None
I
AYES:
NAYS:
Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
IN RE:
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT - ROLLING WOODS SUBDIVISION
On the motion of Supervisor Seibel and the unanimous voice vote of the
Board, the following streets in Rolling Woods Subdivision were this date requested
to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County:
Brownwood Drive from Mountain Road (Route 1423) to end, a
distance of 0.06 mile.
Pinewood Drive from Mountain Road (Route 1423) to end, a distance
of 0.06 mil e.
IN RE:
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT - SPRING VALLEY HIGHLANDS, SECTION 3
On the motion of Supervisor Seibel and the unanimous voice vote of the
Board, the following street in Spring Valley Highlands, Section 3, was this date
requested to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke
I
County:
Tamarack Trail from Fall Road east to dead end, a distance of
o. 16 mil e.
IN RE:
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT - BRYANT HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION, SECTION 2
On the motion of Supervisor Seibel and the unanimous voice vote of the
Board, the following street in Bryant Heights Subdivision, Section 2, was this
date requested to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in
Roanoke County:
Domaca Drive from Garman Drive (Route 1842) to 0.06 mile north,
a distance of 0.06 mile.
I
6-10-75
332
IN RE:
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT - Fairway Forest, Section 2
On the motion of Supervisor Seibel and the unanimous voice vote of the
Board, the following streets in Fairway Forest, Section 2, were this date requested
I
to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County:
Hidden Hill Circle from Fairway Forest Drive to end, a distance
of 0.06 mile.
Chip Circle from Fairway Forest Drive to end, a distance of 0.03
mile.
Hidden Valley Drive from Fairway Forest Drive to Fairway Forest
Drive, a distance of 0.23 mile.
Fairway Forest Drive from WCL Salem to Hidden Valley Drive, a
distance of 0.28 mile.
The Treasurer's monthly report was received by the Board.
IN RE:
RESOLUTION NO. 1279 APPROVING THE FILING OF
FIVE LEAA GRANT REQUESTS
WHEREAS, in report to the Board dated June 5, 1975, the Sheriff of
I
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County that said Board hereby approves the filing of the hereinafter LEAA grant
requests and hereby directs the necessary County officials to execute on behalf of
the Board of Supervisors the appropriate grant applications.
I
1. A $1,415.50 grant request for the improvement of police
communications by the installation of a XEROX Facsimilie Telecopier with local
matching funds amounting to $74.50.
2. A $11,782.85 grant request for the training and education of law
enforcement personnel through specialized inservice and command supervisory
training with local matching funds amounting to $620.15.
~'f~r
6-10-75
'rs~ 3
3. A $44, 914.00 grant request for the improvement of criminal
investigation, detection and prevention for equipment for the detective bureau
personnel with necessary materials and equipment with local matching funds in an
amount of $2,366.00.
4. A $96,843.00 grant request for the improvement of police communica-
I
tions by providing portable radios for those officers presently not having the
same and for further modifications to older mobile radios with local matching
funds in an amount of $5,097.00.
5. A $40,000.00 grant request for the improvement of adult facilities
and providing television and audio facilities in the Roanoke County jail and docket
office and approaches thereto with local matching funds in an amount of $2,000.00.
On motion of Supervisor Seibel and adopted by the following recorded
vote:
AYES: Mr. Dodson, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
NAYS: None
ABSTAINING: Mr. Hilton
IN RE:
RESOLUTION NO. 1280 STATING PRIORITIES FOR
LEAA GRANTS FOR THE 1976-77 FISCAL YEAR
I
WHEREAS, in report to the Board dated June 5, 1975, the Sheriff of
Roanoke County has indicated that the Fifth Planning District Commission has
requested that the Board of Supervisors establish a priority list of potential
programs to be funded by the Division of Justice and Crime Prevention for the
1976-77 fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, the Sheriff has outlined a priority list for Roanoke County,
which list the Board desires to adopt as a priority list of potential programs for
said year.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County that the following list be, and it is hereby adopted as the priority list
of potential programs to be funded by the Division of Justice and Crime Prevention
for the 1976-77 fiscal year for Roanoke County:
1. Improvement of Detection and Apprehension of Criminals
2. Upgrading Criminal Justice Personnel
3. Prevention, Treatment, and Control of Juvenile Delinquency
I
4. Increase in Effectiveness of Correction and Rehabilitation
5.
6.
7.
8.
I 9.
10.
ll.
12.
6-10-75
Improvement of Prosecution and Court Activities and Law Reform
Improvement of Criminal Justice Data Systems
Drug Abuse Prevention, Treatment and Control
Research and Development (Including Evaluation)
Improvement of Community Relations
Prevention and Control of Riots and Civil Disorders
Reduction of Organized Crime
High Incidence Target Programs
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board requests the Fifth Planning Distric
Commission to include the above priorities in its Criminal Justice Plan.
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that said Board indicates that it expects to have
a definite program to be included in the 1976-77 Plan in the areas of communica-
tions, training of police officers, improvement of jail facilities security and in
juvenile delinquency prevention.
vote:
On motion of Supervisor Johnson and adopted by the following recorded
AYES: Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
I
NAYS:
None
The Board received the statement of travel expenses incurred for the
month of Arpil, 1975, by the Sheriff's Department.
IN RE:
AMENDMENT TO GENERAL APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE NO. 1281
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, the General Appropriation Ordinance of
Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 25, 1974, be, and the same is hereby
amended as follows to become effective June 10, 1975:
318i - Contributions to Service Organizations
702a - Contribution to Salem-Roanoke Valley Civic Center Commission: An
additional appropriation of $30,000 is hereby made from the General
Operating Fund for the period ending June 30, 1975, for the
function and purpose hereinabove indicated.
I
AYES:
NAYS:
Adopted by the following recorded vote:
Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
None
""'I .f ;.
........"""J,.,~, t,
6-10-75
rs 3:.'5
I
IN RE:
AMENDMENT TO GENERAL APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE NO. 1282
On motion of Supervisor Johnson~ the General Appropriation Ordinance of
Roanoke County~ Virginia~ adopted June 10~ 1975~ be~ and the same is hereby amended
as follows to become effective July l~ 1975:
702a - Contribution to Salem-Roanoke Valley Civic Center Commission: A
deletion of $30~000 is hereby authorized from the General Operating
Fund for the period ending June 30~ 1976~ for the function and
purpose hereinabove indicated.
I
318i - Contributions to Service Organizations
REVENUES
3099 - Beginning Balance
0001 - Beginning Balance - July 1 ~ 1975: An additional estimate of $30~000
is hereby made to the General Operating Fund for the period ending
June 30~ 1976~ for the function and purpose hereinabove indicated.
Adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mr. Dodson~ Mr. Hilton~ Mrs. Johnson~ Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
None
IN RE:
RESOLUTION NO. 1283 COMMENDING THE WORK OF THE
UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS RESERVE AT THE
GLENVAR RECREATION FIELDS
I
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors, by resolution adopted June 12~ 1973,
requested the United States Marine Corps Reserve to do certain earth moving work
in connection with the development of athletic fields in the Glenvar area of
Roanoke County; and
WHEREAS, said Marine Corps Reserve has completed the work assigned to
them and such work was accomplished in a most satisfactory manner greatly
benefitting the Board of Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors desires to commend the Marine Corps
Reserve for their work in said project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County that said Board hereby commends the United States Marine Corps Reserve for
the work said Marine Corps Reserve performed in connection with the development of
the Glenvar recreation fields and said Board further wishes to express its appre-
ciation for the aid and cooperation extended to Roanoke County during the County's
efforts in developing said recreation fields.
I
On motion of Supervisor Hilton and adopted by the following recorded vot
AYES: Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
NAYS: None
6-10-75
33~'6
IN RE:
RESOLUTION NO. 1284 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF
AN AGREEMENT WITH THE GLENVAR YOUTH BOOSTERS FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CONCESSION STAND AT THE
GLENVAR RECREATION FIELDS
WHEREAS, the G1envar Youth Boosters have, by letter to the Board of
Supervisors dated June 2, 1975, indicated their plans to construct a concession
I
stand at the site of the new athletic fields in the Glenvar area of Roanoke County,
said concession stand also providing two restrooms and a storage room for athletic
equipment; and
WHEREAS, said Glenvar Youth Boosters have requested the Board of
Supervisors to appropriate fifty percent of the construction costs of said building
the total cost of said building to be approximately Twenty Thousand Dollars
($20,000); and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors, being of the opinion that the con-
struction of said building is desirous, deems it desirable to enter into an agree-
ment with the Glenvar Youth Boosters providing for the construction of said build-
ing under certain terms and conditions, and further deems it desirable to appro-
I
priate Ten Thousand Dollars, ($10,000), toward the construction of said building.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County that the County Administrator be, and he is hereby authorized and directed
to enter into an agreement with the Glenvar Youth Boosters providing for terms
under which said Glenvar Youth Boosters would construct a concession stand with
two restrooms and a storage room for athletic equipment; providing in said agree-
ment that the Board of Supervisors shall appropriate the sum of Ten Thousand
Dollars, ($10,000), towards the cost of construction of said facility, said
lagreement to be in a form that is approved by the County Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Hilton and adopted by the following recorded
vote:
AYES: Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
NAYS: None
I
6-10-75
'93 ~
IN RE:
AMENDMENT TO GENERAL APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE NO. 1285
On motion of Supervisor Hilton, the General Appropriation Ordinance of
Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted June 25, 1974, be, and the same is hereby
amended as follows to become effective June 10, 1975:
EXPENDITURES
I
318i - Contributions to Service Organizations
702p - Glenvar Youth Boosters: An additional appropriation of $10,000 is
hereby made from the General Operating Fund for the period ending
June 30, 1975, for the function and purpose hereinabove indicated.
Adopted by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
None
IN RE:
RESOLUTION NO. 1286 RELATING TO THE AUDITING
AND PAYMENT OF CLAIMS BY THE COUNTY
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors did on June 12, 1973, establish the
County Administrator form of government for Roanoke County and did further pre-
scribe the powers and duties of the County Administrator; the Board reserving the
function of approving the payment of payrolls and claims prior to payment of said
WHEREAS, the Attorney General of Virginia has rendered an opinion stating
that pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.1-117 (11), the County Administrator
has the power and duty to audit all claims against the County except those of the
I
payrolls and claims; and
School Board and further has the power to issue all warrants without the require-
ment of the counter-signature of the Chairman of the Board provided said warrants
are also signed by the Treasurer; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Board of Supervisors, pursuant to the
provisions of Section 15.1-117 (11), that the County Administrator be authorized to
audit and pay all claims of the County without the necessity of prior approval of
the Board of Supervisors as long as funds sufficient for the payment of said
claims have been appropriated by the Board of Supervisors and further that all
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
I
warrants are counter-signed by the Treasurer.
County that the County Administrator be, and he is hereby authorized and directed
to audit all claims of every nature against the County, except thoserequired to be
audited by the County School Board, and to approve and pay all such claims without
i, .;.
6-10-75
the necessity of prior approval by the Board of Supervisors, provided that funds
sufficient for the payment of said claims have previously been appropriated by the
Board of Supervisors and provided further that warrants for said payment are
counter-signed by the Treasurer of Roanoke County; the procedure to be followed
I
by the County Administrator to be in accordance with the provisions set out in
Section 15.1-117 (II) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson and adopted by the following recorded
vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hilton, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel, Mr. Flora
None
This concluded the business before the Board at this time, and on the
motion of Supervisor Dodson and the unanimous voice vote of the Board the meeting
was adjourned at 11:00 p.m. to reconvene on Friday, June 13, at 2:00 p.m. in the
Conference Room of the County Administrator's Office located at 306-A East Main
Street in Salem.
I
--\(\~~<S')c .U~-
CHAIRMAN
I