Loading...
5/10/2011 - RegularMay 10, 2011 251 Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of May 2011. Audio and video recordings of this meeting will be held on file for a minimum of five (5) years in the office of the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER was taken. Chairman Church called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. The roll call MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Joseph B. "Butch" Church; Vice Chairman Charlotte A. Moore; Supervisors Michael W. Altizer, Richard C. Flora, Eddie "Ed" Elswick MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: B. Clayton Goodman III, County Administrator; Diane D. Hyatt, Assistant County Administrator; Daniel R. O'Donnell, Assistant County Administrator; Teresa Hamilton Hall, Director of Public Information; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Deborah C. Jacks, Clerk to the Board IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by Pastor Ed Dunnington of Christ the King Presbyterian Church. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. IN RE: PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Proclamation declaring the week of May 15 through 21, 2011, as Emergency Medical Services Week in the County of Roanoke (Richard E. Burch, Jr., Chief of Fire and Rescue) In attendance for this proclamation were Chief Richard E. Burch, Jr.; Division Chief Dustin Campbell; EMS Battalion Chief Bill Duff; EMS Captain Barry Hurley; Chaplain Bart Weakley; Captain Eddie Chitwood; Paramedic /Firefighter Raymond Wells; Firefighter /EMT Kurt Kipley; Firefighter /EMT Todd Hansen; 252 May 10, 2011 Firefighter /EMT Drew Willis and Jennifer Sexton, Volunteer Recruiting /Marketing. Each Supervisor thanked the group for their service. IN RE: NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia approving a Development Agreement for the South Peak Community Development Authority (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) Mr. Mahoney outlined this is a draft resolution for a development agreement for the South Peak Community Development Authority (CDA). In attendance were Angela Stanfill and Craig Penney to answer any questions the Board had. Mr. Mahoney explained this agreement addresses the details of the construction of the public improvements, sets a process where the developer will submit plans, and when approved the CDA will approve and pay if they met the terms and conditions. He also advised there is a failsafe whereby if the new tax revenue does not pay the bonds, then special assessments will be done. Additionally, Mr. Mahoney noted a special assessment ordinance will need to come before the Board. He also stated he is anticipating needing a few more changes; this is the substance of the transaction. RESOLUTION 051011 -1 OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE SOUTH PEAK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County ") on August 24, 2010, created the South Peak Community Development Authority (the "CDA ") pursuant to the Virginia Water and Waste Authorities Act, Chapter 51, Title 15.2 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended (the "Act "), to finance certain infrastructure improvements benefiting property within the CDA District (the "CDA District "), including, but not limited to, public road and intersection improvements, public utilities (including water, sewer, gas and electric lines), parking facilities, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, traffic signals, storm water management and retention systems, street lights and landscaping improvements (collectively, the "Public Improvements "); and WHEREAS, Slate Hill I, LLC (the "Developer ") proposes to undertake, on property of approximately sixty two point five (62.5) acres located in the CDA District, the development of a mixed -use project consisting of commercial, retail and residential components, to be supported by the Public Improvements; and WHEREAS, the Developer proposes to enter into a Development, Acquisition and Financing Agreement (the "Development Agreement ") among the Developer, the County and the CDA to provide for the construction of the Public Improvements by the May 10, 2011 253 Developer, their conveyance to the CDA upon completion and the financing of the Public Improvements through the issuance of revenue bonds by the CDA: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA: Article I. Representations and Findings. The Board of Supervisors hereby finds and determines that providing the Public Improvements is necessary or desirable to meet the increased demands placed on the County as a result of development within the CDA District. Article II. Approval of Development Agreement. The Development Agreement is hereby approved in the form on file with the County Administrator. The Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator, either of whom may act, are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Development Agreement with such completions, omissions, insertions and changes not inconsistent with this Resolution as may be approved by the officer executing the Development Agreement, his execution to constitute conclusive evidence of his approval of any such completions, omissions, insertions and changes. The officers and employees of the County, or their designees, are authorized to execute and deliver on behalf of the County such instruments, documents or certificates, and to do and perform such things and acts, as they shall deem necessary or appropriate to carry out the transactions authorized by this Resolution or contemplated by the Development Agreement; and all of the foregoing, previously done or performed by such officers or agents of the County are in all respects approved, ratified and confirmed. Approval of the Development Agreement pursuant to this Resolution does not constitute approval of the issuance of any bonds by the CDA. Article III. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. On motion of Supervisor Moore to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Altizer, Flora, Elswick, Church NAYS: None IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance to appropriate funds for the fiscal year 2011 -2012 budget and approval of the Classification Plan for fiscal year 2011 -2012 (W. Brent Robertson, Director of Management and Budget) Mr. Robertson explained this is the first reading of an ordinance to appropriate funds for the fiscal year 2011 -2012 budget and approve the Classification Plan for fiscal year 2012. Mr. Robertson explained the only change from work session was the County Administrator's allocation to Virginia Department of Transportation 254 May 10, 2011 (VDOT) revenue sharing, of which only $100,000 will be needed. The remaining $200,000 will be reallocated as follows: $19,000 — Roanoke Regional Partnership; $70 — Employee Benefits for Line of Duty and the remaining $111,000 would be set aside for maintenance. Supervisor Altizer requested Mr. Robertson explain to the viewing ordinance the terms interfund and intrafund, which Mr. Robertson explained were accounting treatments for governmental accounting for transfers to the Roanoke County School system, which they retain on their records as well. This alleviates double booking. There was no further discussion. Chairman Church moved to approve the first reading and scheduled the second reading for May 24, 2011. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Altizer, Flora, Elswick, Church NAYS: None 2. Ordinance to amend the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance (John Murphy, Zoning Administrator) Mr. Murphy explained the recommended amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. He advised that the Planning Commission had approved five to zero (5 -0) on April 5, 2011. There was no discussion. Supervisor Moore moved to approve the first reading and scheduled the second reading for May 24, 2011. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Altizer, Flora, Elswick, Church NAYS: None 3. Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code Chapter 13. "Offenses — Miscellaneous ", Article I. "In General ", Section 13 -4. "Discharge of firearms, air guns, etc., generally" by the addition of a new section numbered 13 -4.1. "Discharge of firearms near dwellings" (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) Mr. Mahoney explained this ordinance would prohibit the discharge of firearms within one hundred (100) yards of homes and occupied dwellings. It has been prepared at the request of Chairman Church. Currently, the Roanoke County Code declares it unlawful to discharge firearms within the County, except when lawfully hunting, when safely engaged in target practice or when lawfully and safely shooting on a licensed range or shooting match. It is also unlawful to shoot any firearm in or along or within one hundred (100) yards of any road or street in the County. It is unlawful to hunt or trap within one hundred (100) yards of any primary or secondary highway in the May 10, 2011 255 County. Finally, it is unlawful to hunt within one hundred (100) yards of any public school or County park. Supervisor Altizer stated he supports the first reading, but suggested that a work session be held before it goes to second reading. He advised he is concerned with regard to the rural areas and good prime hunting land could be reduced for people with large tracts of land and he would like to understand the ramifications for these areas and how much of a reduction they would have for hunting. Chairman Church stated the ordinance does not include discharging a firearm on your own property and asked Mr. Mahoney to verify, which Mr. Mahoney did. Supervisor Elswick stated he agreed on the work session because he is unclear on what motivated this change. He explained he and his neighbors shoot from their own decks for target practice or if a coyote is sited. Supervisor Flora stated he can see what the concerns are, but the discussion is about people who do random shooting that have no permission whatsoever, people that like to shoot guns. He also feels a work session is appropriate as more clarification is needed. Chairman Church explained the reason this has come up was a family in the Catawba District noted someone out with a high - powered rifle, not hunting but firing at random and scared the children. Accordingly, Mr. Mahoney was contacted and advised there was already a restriction of one hundred (100) yards from a highway or road and he stated he feels the public is more important than a highway or a road and thinks a work session would be good Chairman Church moved to approve the first reading and requested a work session to be held prior to the second reading of this ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Altizer, Flora, Elswick, Church NAYS: None 4. Ordinance amending Chapter 4. "Amusements ", Section 4 -4. "Definitions ", Section 4 -11. "Security" and Section 4 -13. "Entry and inspections; enforcement; penalties" of the Roanoke County Code to provide for security, inspection and penalties for the failure to maintain private swimming pools (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) Mr. Mahoney explained this ordinance was requested by the County Administrator to address the problem of owners of private swimming pools failing to maintain these facilities and allowing the growth of algae and the creation of breeding areas for mosquitoes. He advised this appears to be more prevalent as properties are foreclosed upon; otherwise abandoned. Mr. Mahoney also noted this has been discussed with Joel Baker, the Building Commissioner and he is in agreement. 256 May 10, 2011 Supervisor Flora stated that one of the reasons this has arisen is due to an issue in Bonsack, where the owners walked away from the home and abandoned the pool full of water. He noted that under new construction the builder must adhere to certain rules to make sure that it is done right. Now, there is a maintenance issue and there are no provisions for safely maintaining these pools. Supervisor Flora stated he thinks a work session is appropriate to help educate the Board on this issue. Supervisor Altizer commented he agrees a work session would be good. He advised that one thing he would like to have at the work session is a definition of "adequately secured." Supervisor Moore stated she concurs that a work session would be appropriate as she has several questions. Chairman Church asked Mr. Mahoney and Mr. Baker, Building Commissioner, when insurance companies look at insuring a home with a pool, there are rigid requirements and is the County getting into the same area with Mr. Mahoney advising in his experience in many of the private pool issues, the County has relied on the insurance industry. He advised the current County Code pertained to public pools and safety issues toward the swim clubs. In regard to private pools, it was tied to common sense to protect themselves in concert with their insurance company. Mr. Baker advised new pools that are installed now are required to have a permit; and are checked for fences, etc. Last year, during Building Safety Month pool safety was stressed. Chairman Church advised he wanted the viewing audience to see that the Board is not trying to set stringent guidelines on the private homeowner; that is not our purpose, which Mr. Baker confirmed and stated the real issue is the pools that are no longer being maintained and have degraded to the point they are a health hazard to the neighbors and the public in general because there is no one there to take care of it. He further indicated he has not received any complaints on an occupied property. He indicated the County has no means to address the abandoned pools and no penalties for non - compliance. Supervisor Flora moved to approve the first reading and requested a work session prior to the second reading. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Altizer, Flora, Elswick, Church NAYS: None 5. Ordinance authorizing the granting of a fifteen foot utility easement to Appalachian Power on property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors (Tax Map No. 097.05 -01- 26.00) for the purpose of an underground electric power line to the new South County Library facility, Cave Spring Magisterial District (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) May 10, 2011 257 Mr. Mahoney explained the reason for the ordinance as outlined in the Board report. There was no discussion. Supervisor Moore moved to approve the first reading and schedule the second reading for May 24, 2011. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Altizer, Flora, Elswick, Church NAYS: None IN RE: PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the purchase of approximately two (2.0) acres of real estate (Tax Map No. 79.01 -4 -22) from K.W. and Nancy A. McNeil for library purposes and appropriation of $306,000 from the Major Capital Fund, Vinton Magisterial District (Diane D. Hyatt, Assistant County Administrator) Ms. Hyatt explained the purchase of this property was for library purposes. The only change from the first reading was the appropriation amount increased from $304,000 to $306,000 as a result of testing. There was no discussion. No citizens spoke on this agenda item. ORDINANCE 051011 -2 AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF APPROXIMATELY TWO (2.0) ACRES OF REAL ESTATE (TAX MAP NO. 79.01 -4 -22) FROM K. W. AND NANCY A. MCNEIL FOR LIBRARY PURPOSES, VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on April 15, 2011, Roanoke County entered into a contract of sale, subject to approval by the Board of Supervisors, with K. W. and Nancy A. NcNeil for the purchase of approximately 2.0 acres of real estate for the purchase price of $300,000 in the Vinton Magisterial District for library purposes; and WHEREAS, the County now wishes to approve and ratify the execution of said contract and purchase this real estate; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition and conveyance of real estate interests be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 26, 2011, and the second reading was held on May 10, 2011; and NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the contract of sale dated April 15, 2011, for the acquisition of approximately two (2.0) acres of real estate (Tax Map No. 79.01 -4 -22) for the sum of $300,000 is hereby approved and ratified and further that the acquisition of said real estate is hereby authorized and approved. 258 May 10, 2011 2. That the sum of $306,000 is available in the Major Capital fund to pay all of the costs of this acquisition, and is hereby appropriated for this purpose. This amount is for the purchase price of this real estate and for the various closing costs to complete this transaction. 3. That the County Administrator or Assistant County Administrator are hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of this real estate, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Altizer to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Altizer, Flora, Elswick, Church NAYS: None IN RE: APPOINTMENTS Parks, Recreation and Advisory Commission - Chairman Church appointed Larry Peterson to fill the unexpired term of David Watt, which expires June 30, 2012. Confirmation was placed on the Consent Agenda IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA RESOLUTION 051011 -3 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I- CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for May 10, 2011, designated as Item I Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 -2, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes — April 12, 2011 2. Confirmation of appointment to the Parks, Recreation and Tourism Advisory Commission On motion of Supervisor Altizer to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Altizer, Flora, Elswick, Church NAYS: None IN RE: REPORTS May 10, 2011 259 Supervisor Flora moved to receive and file the following reports. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Altizer, Flora, Elswick, Church NAYS: None 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Reserves 3. Reserve for Board Contingency 4. Proclamations signed by the Chairman IN RE: CLOSED MEETING At 3:58 p.m., Chairman Church moved to go into closed meeting following the work sessions pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section Section 2.2- 3711.A.3 Discussion or consideration of the acquisition of real property for a public purpose, or of the disposition of publicly held real property, where discussion in an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining position or negotiating strategy of the public body and Section 2.2- 3711.A.5. Discussion concerning a prospective business or industry or the expansion of an existing business or industry where no previous announcement has been made of the business' or industry's interest in locating or expanding its facilities in the County. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Altizer, Flora, Elswick, Church NAYS: None The closed meeting was held from 6:07 p.m. until 6:50 p.m. IN RE: WORK SESSIONS At 3:59 p.m. Chairman Church recessed to the fourth floor for work sessions and closed meeting. 1. Work session to discuss the impact of passing along the employee portion of the Plan 2 Virginia Retirement System (VRS) contribution rate to employees (Diane D. Hyatt, Assistant County Administrator) In attendance for this work session were Diane D. Hyatt, Assistant County Administrator; Mr. B. Clayton Goodman III, County Administrator; Daniel R. O'Donnell, Assistant County Administrator; Rebecca Owens, Director of Finance; Joseph Sgroi, 260 May 10, 2011 Director of Human Resources; Anita Hassell, Manager of Human Resources and Laurie Gearheart, Assistant Director of Finance. The work session was held from 4:18 p.m. until 4:35 p.m. Ms. Hyatt explained this was the second work session on this issue and is also an agenda item for action at tonight's meeting. She explained this pertains to the passing of the five percent (5 %) employee portion of the Virginia Retirement System (VRS); this would affect all employees hired after July 1, 2010, approximately forty (40) employees currently and all future employees. These employees were advised of this upon being hired. Ms. Hyatt then reviewed the attachments in the agenda package, a copy of which is on file in the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors office. She advised it is staff's recommendation to pass along the five percent (5 %) employee contribution to the Plan 2 employees and suggested a salary supplement be paid in the 2011 -2012 fiscal year of five percent (5 %) in two (2) installments. Additionally, Ms. Hyatt noted anyone hired after today would be hired with the knowledge they would be responsible for their own five percent (5 %) contribution. She also noted the School Board would be considering this at their next meeting and all indications are they will pass it. Supervisor Altizer stated no argument could be made with the numbers and if the School Board does the same, it would be significant savings. Additionally, he noted he believes this is something that will eventually come through from the State level. Also, if something is not done now, the forty (40) employees will become eighty (80) and on and on. He explained the four point nine nine percent (4.99 %) would become twenty percent (20 %) on a $40 million payroll for just one line item. He further added he thinks the budget will be tighter next year, and we must do everything we can to position Roanoke County as we have in the past which has enabled us to weather the hard times when other localities could not. Mr. Goodman stated he reluctantly agrees, he does not like it, however the numbers cannot be ignored. He stated it is his recommendation to proceed with the action at the Board meeting scheduled for this evening. He clarified with the magnitude of the numbers; it is a major savings to the citizens. Chairman Church stated this is something that weighs heavy on him; anything that has an adverse effect does, and it is not something he wants to do. He noted that no one single department is being singled out, it is going to be universal across the Board. Additionally, he noted how quickly the numbers had escalated from twenty eight (28) in February to forty (40) in May. Supervisor Moore stated she does not like it either, but agrees with Mr. Goodman that the savings cannot be ignored. She stated that these forty (40) individuals be compensated as best the County can. Chairman Church stated that a four to five percent (4 -5 %) supplement has been discussed. Additionally, these employees will be receiving a four percent supplement and between that check and half of the five percent (5 %) in July, they will have had two checks and another in July, altogether a nine percent (9 %) supplement. Supervisor Flora stated he would like to restate his position on this issue. He advised until the General Assembly took action this year, Roanoke County had to May 10, 2011 261 offer every employee the same fringe benefit; now the State is stating you can create more than one class of employee. He stated he has a problem with the equality; employees should never be about the numbers. He indicated if it is all about saving money, just reduce staff. Supervisor Elswick stated he agreed with everybody, but it is regrettable as it is, it is something that must be done. The newly hired employees will understand at the beginning, which should make us feel a little better. Supervisor Flora indicated if we were doing this for every employee, he would vote for it. Mr. Goodman explained that they are prohibited by the State from doing that. It was the consensus of the Board to bring this item before the Board at the 7:00 p.m. meeting. Finally, Ms. Hyatt indicated that if the action is approved at tonight's Board meeting, the action to award a supplement will be attached to the Board action for the next meeting with the Budget appropriation. 2. Work session on Roanoke County's Development Standards, which exceed the State's minimum requirements ( Tarek Moneir, Deputy Director of Development Services) In attendance for this work session was Tarek Moneir, Deputy Director of Development Services; Mr. B. Clayton Goodman III, County Administrator; Mr. Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development and Mr. Joel Baker, Building Commissioner. The work session was held from 4:36 p.m. until 5:21 p.m. Mr. Goodman explained Mr. Moneir will outline where the Roanoke County Development Standards exceed that of the State's minimum requirement. Mr. Goodman pointed out that the section on the new Fire Code would be postponed until a later date, as the new Fire Codes were just handed out for the first time last week and staff is still reviewing. Mr. Moneir and Mr. Covey provided the Board with a PowerPoint presentation, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. Mr. Covey indicated the key issues that would be focused on more would be the erosion sediment control, stormwater as well as steep slope development. Mr. Moneir identified the requirements above and beyond the State's minimum requirements and identified the most cost effective development regulations that protect the citizens. Supervisor Altizer stated if he understood this information correctly, if someone wants to build on a flat piece of land on Fallen Creek, that person would be held to the same standards as it relates to the square footage as someone that is sitting up on the side of the mountain. Mr. Covey responded it is based on disturbed acreage, but the difference there would the slope requirements on the side of the mountain. If it is a flat piece of land, it is based on disturbed area and they still have to address the erosion, sediment control, but the thing to keep in mind is the practices that are implemented versus on the slope and the flat piece of land; and each situation is 262 May 10, 2011 evaluated based on the topography and the topography information they provide when they submit their plan. Supervisor Altizer then clarified that the amount of disturbed square footage would be the same. Supervisor Flora stated when looking at 5,000 square feet, and there is a relatively level lot, are they still required to have a Certified Land Disturber and the other things that go with it if you are building on the side of the mountain. Mr. Covey responded they would need to have a Certified Land Disturber, a landscape architect or a professional engineer to verify and submit the plan for approval. Supervisor Elswick asked if Mr. Covey and Mr. Moneir are aware of a stop work order for a piece of land that Dave Higgenbotham was clearing last week. He stated he has looked at the order and Roanoke County stopped Mr. Higgenbotham from moving the dirt and he had to put a plastic barrier up. Mr. Baker advised the reason he was stopped was because he was tearing down a building and was burying it, which is a Department of Environmental Qualified (DEQ) violation by creating a landfill. Supervisor Elswick inquired what did the County do. Mr. Baker advised that Mr. Higgenbotham was advised he could not bury the building. Supervisor Elswick then inquired what did the County do next. Mr. Baker stated he assumed that the inspector looked at the site. Mr. Covey advised there were two parts of this issue, if you demolish a building, a permit is needed the second part is if you are demolishing a building and grading and disturbing land, an erosion and sediment control permit is required The erosion and sediment control permit is based on disturbed land. The plan is to control the sediment and the plan of action, once the project is done is to seed it and to restabilize it. Mr. Baker advised that Mr. Higgenbotham did have a permit, but it was not posted. Supervisor Elswick inquired if the County has somebody that does what the architect does; can we use our own judgment. He advised the reason he asked if there were two citizens on Mount Chestnut that built houses and the yards were not really steep, but they had flagged both yards as to what they were going to do to improve the yard whereby they could mow the grass and the inspector said he could not approve it because it needed to be approved by an architectural engineer. He advised it cost $2,000 and he approved exactly what they had laid out. Supervisor Elswick stated he was wondering if we could not make some of those judgments without the citizen having to pay that kind of money for an architect. Mr. Moneir responded by stating the County cannot approve plans that are prepared by the County. The County can prepare plans, but it not our responsibility to prepare plans for a homeowner. If an inspector goes onto the site or an engineer visits a construction site and basically arbitrarily or based on professional experience, he might provide the owner with suggestions. The private engineer has to verify the calculations, sign off and propose to the County the solutions to control the erosion and sediment based on land disturbance. Supervisor Elswick then asked if the land owner can submit the plans themselves, could the County not approve. Mr. Monier responded by stating only if the May 10, 2011 263 person is certified by the State. He further advised that anyone can get certified by the State if they really know what they are doing. Mr. Goodman responded that the average citizen cannot or would not. Supervisor Elswick then asked if they could ask their neighbor to get certified, all that person has to do is request certification. Mr. Covey responded it is an online test. Mr. Covey stated a homeowner basically can do in lieu of the plan for less than 5,000 square feet of disturbance. Supervisor Elswick responded he thought it was larger than 5,000 square feet. Mr. Covey replied when you get into larger acreage, rolling land and a lot of other things there are a lot of things that come out of the woodwork that you need to make sure the person has a good plan. They need to be looking at the soil, in some parts of the County, Falling Creek is a prime example, the whole mountainside was nothing but sand, which was very hard to control. He added there are some places in Roanoke County that are clay; soil conditions play into the whole stabilization factor as well and how you cut and fill. A lot of people try to fill in ravines. These things need to be looked at. He stated another key is to make sure what they are doing is not going to affect the adjacent property owner. Supervisor Elswick stated he just wondered if Roanoke County went too far, explaining if you look at what the Virginia Department of Transportation is doing on Route 221, Roanoke County would never approve what they are doing and he hates to see an impact on citizens when it might not be necessary, maybe we are trying to be too good. Mr. Goodman asked Mr. Covey to explain the prior regulation. Mr. Covey explained there was in lieu of plan agreement and you would fill that out and they are responsible for the erosion and sediment control. Unfortunately, there were a great deal of complaints from adjacent property owners regarding erosion, mud. Since this new process has been implemented, the complaint basis on the neighbors has gone down. He stated he knew it was an impact to the homeowner because it is an additional expense. Mr. Moneir explained the previous plan was complicated and time consuming. Mr. Goodman asked if he had one hundred (100) acres and built a house right in the middle of it, hypothetically, and if disturbing more than 5,000 square feet around the house and no one is within a mile of the property, do I still need to get a certified RLD, LA or PE with Mr. Covey responding in the affirmative. Ms. Moore indicated it should be a lot less expensive for the landowner in the long run. She stated she felt the County needed to be cautious to avoid certain things from happening. Mr. Goodman then advised the next section was on fire protection and he wanted Mr. Covey and Chief Burch to review before discussing further. Supervisor Altizer then inquired what is done in a rural area when someone wants to buy a house, but there is no public water. Mr. Goodman stated he was not sure. Chief Burch asked if the Board would please let them review the new regulations before answering any questions. Supervisor Altizer then asked what would be done under the old regulations. He advised that the County's land base is dwindling and people are moving to rural areas, how do we measure it right now as to whether a 264 May 10, 2011 building permit can be issued. Are there any requirements they would have to meet for fire protection? Gary Huffman responded it would not be addressed for one property owner, only if it were a subdivision, which would be four more houses. He added if there is no water supply, there are other methods that can come into play to provide fire protection and there are other standards that can be adopted, which has been done in the past. For example, Bent Mountain does not have public water, but they have the ability to create ponds and draft sites. Supervisor Altizer remarked he wanted a baseline to compare to the new regulations. Mr. Goodman responded that will be done. Supervisor Altizer indicated the new construction in Falling Creek does not seem to have the problems the older subdivisions had. He stated he understands that on a steep slope you can expect to pay more, however, he has a problem when more cost is being put on smaller pieces of property that do not fit into that category and has the type of runoff from something that is virtually flat, not a lot around it, not expected to have a lot of runoff. He stated an ordinance in a perfect world, for rezoning, a special use permit can be used because we know ordinances do not fit every piece of property in Roanoke County. He asked if there was a way that staff can go back and look at some of these, where there is discretion on what you can do or if we could lower it because all pieces of property are not created equal. He further clarified from his perspective, he just wants the County to be fair and if it takes a little exercise to get in there and find out what can be done and what are the right things. He stated Mr. Covey had mentioned all the complaints subdivisions had years ago, but stated he did not know how many complaints were received when we were disturbing less than 10,000 square feet. Mr. Covey responded the major complaints came from subdivisions. He advised staff gets less complaints on 10,000, i.e. there were no complaints on Walmart, but if you go to a residential area there are more complaints. He explained the difference is on construction such as Walmart there are contractors assigned to that, but on residential it is basically the responsibility of the builder and he may not always be there. There are subcontractors going in and out, silt fences get torn down and they do not go back and check. Mr. Covey then stated his understanding of what Supervisor Altizer is saying is that from 2,500 to 5,000 is probably where the certification and more engineering requirements are. He stated the key thing is to get the right plan; a lot of people do not have the tools to prevent certain issues. When staff looks at a plot plan, they are looking at the drainage around the house, coming off of the house and concern must be given on how the water will be discharged on small lots, making sure the property is graded properly to the street or to a natural swell on the sides. He stated the homeowner will not have this information; it will either be the County, who will use their topography map or aerial photography. We do have inspectors in the field constantly. Supervisor Elswick stated he is in agreement with Supervisor Altizer and stated he thinks the Board should look at some instances, and he has a couple that he will bring in. He stated staff might learn something in the process. Mr. Covey stated we do get people that have ten acres and want to put a house in middle and staff tried to use good discretion on those. He further clarified that May 10, 2011 265 they have gone on cases where they put in a single - family house and have disturbed the ten (10) acres. Supervisor Altizer then asked if there were ever any cases out there that the inspectors have said, "if I just had the authority, I think you could do this, this and this." Mr. Covey responded inspectors have the authority to make those changes. Supervisor Elswick asked if Mr. Covey knew when they make those judgements with Mr. Moneir responding in the affirmative, as they are documented. He stated he understood where Supervisor Altizer was coming from, but wanted him to know that staff uses common sense, they work with the applicant and agree ninety -nine percent (99 %) of the time, however there are some who attempt to go around the rules and when they are caught, there is no option but to stop the work and start over. Mr. Covey stated even on the citizens that obtain their own permits, that is always a challenge, an inspector is assigned to meet with them and in the field and to assist them in getting on the right path on the items they need to implement. Mr. Goodman stated that he understood Supervisor Altizer has asked if it was possible to make a distinction between steep slopes and a relatively flat parcel and can we change or see if we have to require the same amount of standards or not. Supervisor Altizer responded by stating in his perspective putting the same standards on something that is called a good lot, level, etc. that it be judged by steep slopes of Falling Creek, there is something wrong. Mr. Goodman responded part of the issue is that there are steep slope issues, but also under the erosion and sediment, it is based on square footage, whether it is on the side of a cliff or flat as a pancake. Staff can look to see if any distinction can be made. Supervisor Flora stated it appears when the County develops regulations; the worst case scenario is taken into consideration and adopt the regulations accordingly. He further clarified that any construction is going to impact, the issue is the degree of impact; one size does not fit all. He advised he would like staff to go back and revisit to see if something can be done to allow for flexibility. 3. Work session to discuss adopting Part III of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code — Virginia Maintenance Code ( Tarek Moneir, Deputy Director of Development Services) In attendance for this work session were Tarek Moneir, Deputy Director of Development services; Mr. Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development; Mr. Joel Baker, Building Commissioner, Mr. Paul Mahoney, County Attorney, Nicole Pendleton, Planner II and Mr. B. Clayton Goodman III, County Administrator. The work session was held from 5:22 p.m. until 5:56 p.m. Mr. Goodman explained this request came from a Board member to discuss the possibility of adding on to our building code, the Virginia Maintenance Code. He explained there are three sections of the State -wide building code. He reiterated Roanoke County has not adopted the maintenance code. 266 May 10, 2011 Mr. Baker went through a PowerPoint presentation explaining the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code, a copy of which is on file in the office of Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. He explained there are three sections. The optional part of the code is the enforcement. Supervisor Elswick inquired if our zoning ordinance takes care of unsafe structures, imminent collapse into account, for example if a communication tower is one hundred (100) feet tall and is unsafe, imminent collapse. Mr. Baker advised it would be investigated and if it was deteriorated to the point that it was going to collapse, the County could condemn it and force the owner to either remove or correct. Mr. Covey responded this would not fall under Zoning, but under Building. Mr. Elswick then asked if it was condemned, would the County require ninety (90) days to make it safe. Mr. Baker responded in the affirmative. Supervisor Elswick advised what if it was unsafe. Mr. Baker responded if it was an immediate danger, the County could step in and take it down and send the bill to the owner. Supervisor Elswick then asked if it was judgment call because an ordinance typically reads ninety (90) days. Mr. Baker explained ninety (90) days seems to be a reasonable amount of time. Supervisor Altizer asked if Roanoke County had passed a nuisance ordinance a few years ago that took care of "blighted" houses. Mr. Baker advised this was included in the presentation. Supervisor Flora stated the code is mandatory, but local option as to whether or not to enforce, which seems a contradiction. He questioned since it is a local option can you pick and choose from the Code what you want to enforce? Mr. Mahoney responded there is a split of authority on that question. He stated he did not know the answer to it, he replies on a friend of his who is a City Attorney, he does not think so, however, there are some other City Attorneys who say you can pick and choose. Supervisor Flora stated Roanoke County cannot be compared with Roanoke City because their housing stock is entirely different. He also stated they have four hundred (400) court cases a year and doubts Roanoke County has four hundred (400) complaints in a year. Supervisor Flora stated Roanoke County has adopted some of it, through the backdoor, i.e. the Green Valley issues. He stated in essence the whole concept of the Code is to avoid blighted neighborhoods. Mr. Mahoney stated he thinks "blight" is harder to meet though than some of the provisions under the property maintenance code. Mr. Goodman advised staff had also looked into grant funding, because the people the most impacted would be the ones most likely not to be able to afford it. Ms. Pendleton advised the grant opportunities that exist are really geared towards more urban areas, with a lot lower incomes than Roanoke County has. Blacksburg, Christiansburg and the City of Radford obtained their Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) funds together because they are the urban area for Montgomery County. Mr. Goodman explained that is entitlement. Home funding falls under that because they have the same consolidated plan to obtain those funds. Roanoke County does not have a consolidated plan through the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban May 10, 2011 267 Development (HUD) like they do, like Roanoke City does. There are some State CDBG funds, but they are not for planning purposes, they are directed at programs and housing opportunities and substantial rehabilitation of existing structures, but nothing for administration of programs. Supervisor Flora stated the CDBG program also requires fifty -one percent (51 %) low to moderate income. Accordingly, there are so few neighborhoods in the County that this threshold would pertain and he guessed there may be one (1) neighborhood in Hollins that could apply or in Vinton that might. He clarified those specific neighborhoods would need to be targeted for a block grant and do a neighborhood revitalization grant. He stated it would not be impossible, but when you have to put together five or six (5 or 6) neighborhoods, it becomes difficult to administer. Supervisor Altizer had a question regarding maintenance that "requires normal and preventive maintenance" by the owner. He asked if the County would cite a homeowner because eight or ten (8 or 10) pieces of siding blew off in a storm. Mr. Baker stated it was possible. Supervisor Altizer then asked if they do not have the money, are we then going to take them to court and fine them and they are not going to be able to pay the fine, etc. Mr. Baker explained what is going to happen is that the neighbors are going to call and say, "The siding is off and it looks bad, I want somebody come out and look at it." It is not that staff would be out looking for it, but would have to respond to a call. Mr. Covey explained he thought the complaints were more extreme, it had been going on for some time, i.e. a roof that needs to be repaired. He indicated every time these situations are investigated it is usually the property owner does not have the funds to fix the situation and it becomes very frustrating with the adjoining property owners as they are concerned about the value of their property. Mr. Covey stated Roanoke County is very fortunate that we do not have that many in Roanoke County, but when it occurs it is a concern. Supervisor Moore stated people are actually living in these houses that are falling down, they do not have rails on their stairs, the roof is caving in and this is all over the County. She stated she would like to gear this toward helping people, even if we have to hold another work session. The properties are aging, the people are aging and a lot of people cannot afford to maintain the property and not do it on a criminal basis, but just as a civil matter. If we get a complaint, are there any grants, TAP, Arnold Burton, something that staff could steer these people if they legitimately need help repairing their homes, because they are living in them, they are unsafe, no sewer, no water, the roof is caving in, the carport is caving in, etc. They really need help and she would like to see Roanoke County work on something to where we could help them and in turn help the neighborhood as well. Supervisor Altizer then asked Mr. Mahoney to go back to Supervisor Flora's question, stating he would like a definitive answer as whether you can pick or choose. He stated he agreed there were people out there living in a dangerous situation and he is having heartburn because they are the people that need some help 268 May 10, 2011 and if there is a way to get some help, we can. However, he does not want to see any inspector giving someone a real rough time because they have four or five pieces of siding off, or they have not painted around their eaves, etc. He stated he would like for Roanoke County to figure out a way to help these people. Mr. Goodman stated he would like to obtain the Board's consensus to continue to pursue the grant opportunities, the home consortium and bring back to the Board in late June or July. Supervisor Altizer stated Mr. Goodman should talk to the southeast rural group where groups come from colleges and repair roofs, porches, etc. Supervisor Elswick stated staff could coordinate with the church groups. He stated he agreed with everything and reiterated the County could not hire twenty (20) people. He clarified the County cannot opt in but on our own there is a lot that can be done. Supervisor Flora stated to dispel one misunderstanding, in his former life he was the code official in the City of Danville, and has enforced this ordinance in the past. The City attorney at the time advised that cosmetic and aestitic issues are not enforceable. The maintenance must have deteriorated to the point it is unsafe or not fit for human habitation. Supervisor Elswick stated maybe we can define the unsafe conditions, i.e. if the grass is too tall it can harbor snakes, which can harm children. IN RE: CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION At 7:00 p.m., Chairman Church moved to return to open session and adopt the certification resolution. RESOLUTION 051011 -4 CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.2 -3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each member's knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies; and May 10, 2011 269 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Church to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Altizer, Flora, Elswick, Church NAYS: None IN RE: NEW BUSINESS 1. Request to rescind the authorization to pick -up the employee's contribution to the Virginia Retirement System (VRS) for Plan 2 employees (Diane D. Hyatt, Assistant County Administrator) Ms. Hyatt outlined the request to rescind the authorization to pick -up the employee's contribution to the VRS for Plan 2 employees as outlined in the Board Report attached to the agenda. Chairman Church requested that Ms. Hyatt detail some of the numbers and their corresponding annual amounts. Ms. Hyatt stated that for the fiscal year 2011- 2012 the annual savings would be $148,000, in the initial year that would be offset with the cost of $63,000 to pay the one -time salary supplement to the employees, in 2017- 2018 the annual savings would be $748,000 a year and by 2030 -2031 the savings would be $2.1 million a year. The cumulative savings over the twenty (20) year period is $22.8 million. Additionally, at the end of the twenty (20) year period, ninety -three percent (93 %) of the employees would have turned over to new employees. Chairman Church then asked what would be saved in 2013 -2014 with Ms. Hyatt responding $340,000 or a cumulated savings of $732,000. Supervisor Altizer commented the Board had held three work sessions on this item and the concern is with our employees and this only effects new employees hired since July 1, 2010, which is a State requirement. The number is forty (40) employees and that number will grow exponentially. Additionally, it is understood that at some point in the future, the State will come back and make us do it anyway. The numbers are huge, there are 900 employees and the School Board has about double that. The potential for savings across Roanoke County taking into account the Schools would be $66 million. Ms. Hyatt stated that the School Board would be meeting this week to make the same decision. He stated this is a hard decision and we are in changing times and knows all of the Board members have agonized over this decision. Supervisor Flora asked if an employee is vested in the Virginia Retirements System (VRS) and takes off to have children and she comes back and she still has her VRS benefits how would she be treated. Ms. Hyatt responded that she would come back as a Plan 1 employee, if she left as a Plan 1 employee and did not 270 May 10, 2011 take her money out, she would come back as Plan 1. However, if she took her money out, she would have to start over as a Plan 2 employee. Supervisor Flora stated he had stated his objections on this several times. He stated he has a problem with the equity of this, in the past the State has never allowed localities to have more than one level of employee, but because the State could not balance their budget, they allowed their employees to pay their portion and also allowed the localities to do the same. He further added he would not have a problem if it pertained to all employees. Ethically, he stated he has a problem with it Chairman Church stated once again the State of Virginia has painted the County into a corner. He advised that he feels sure that the citizens understand as they have had to do the same thing at home. It is a shame we are forced to do this. We have had three sessions on this and none of them have been easy or quick, however, the potential savings of millions make is hard to look the other way. He then asked Ms. Hyatt to explain about the one -time supplement these forty (40) employees will receive in addition to the five percent (5 %) supplement. She advised a four percent (4 %) salary supplement in addition to the one time five percent (5 %) supplement for a total of nine percent (9 %), payable May 13, 2011, July 1, 2011 and January 1, 2012. Supervisor Moore reiterated what Chairman Church said, even though the forty (40) employees were told at the time they were hired that the County may not continue to pay the employee portion, she feels that something is being taken away from them. Supervisor Altizer requested that the action item be amended to hold the Plan 2 employee harmless for a period of two years. He requested that language be added for payments to occur on July 1, 2011, January 1, 2012, July 1, 2012 and January 1, 2013 and to be added to the budget appropriation. Chairman Church and Supervisor Moore advised they concurred with Supervisor Altizer. RESOLUTION 051011 -6 RESCINDING RESOLUTION 062210 -1 AND REQUIRING PLAN 2 EMPLOYEES TO PAY THE EMPLOYEE'S CONTRIBUTION TO VIRGINIA RETIREMENT SYSTEM (VRS) UNDER § 414(h) OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE WHEREAS, the Virginia General Assembly, in its 2010 session passed legislation creating a separate retirement plan for employees hired on or after July 1, 2010, (hereafter referred to as "Plan 2 Employees "). The legislation stipulates that Plan 2 Employees will pay their five percent (5 %) member contribution and that, absent other action by the employer, such contribution will be paid through salary reduction according to Internal Revenue Code § 414 (h) on a pre -tax basis; and May 10, 2011 271 WHEREAS, the legislation allowed certain employers, including the County of Roanoke, Virginia, to pay all or a portion of the member contributions on behalf of its Plan 2 Employees as an additional benefit not paid as salary; and WHEREAS, on June 22, 2010, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County adopted Resolution 062210 -1 which elected to pay all of Roanoke County Plan 2 Employees member contributions; and WHEREAS, the election to pay all or a portion of the member contributions on behalf of its Plan 2 Employees as an additional benefit not paid as salary shall remain in effect for the fiscal year July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2010, and shall continue in effect beyond the end of such fiscal year absent a subsequent resolution changing the way the five percent (5 %) member contribution is paid; and WHEREAS, employee contributions that are picked -up as an additional benefit not paid as salary are not considered wages for purposes of VA Code § 51.1 -700 et seq. nor shall they be considered salary for purposes of VA Code § 51.1 -100 et seq.; and WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke, Virginia now desires to rescind its June 22, 2010, election to pay its Plan 2 Employees' member contributions to VRS and to require said Plan 2 employees to pay the five percent (5 %) member contribution beginning July 1, 2011. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County as follows: 1. That Resolution 062210 -1 is hereby rescinded. 2. That effective the first day of July, 2011, the County of Roanoke, Virginia shall require its Plan 2 Employees to pay the five percent (5 %) member contribution for the Virginia Retirement System under Section 414(h) of the Internal Revenue Code. On motion of Supervisor Altizer to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Altizer, Elswick, Church NAYS: Supervisor Flora IN RE: PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READINGS OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance reapportioning the representation in the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, by altering the boundaries of the election districts by establishing voting precincts therefor, incorporating a map showing the boundaries of said districts and precincts and providing for an effective date of this ordinance (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) 272 May 10, 2011 Mr. Mahoney outlined the ordinance explaining the redistricting that was being done as a result of the 2010 Census. Mr. Mahoney thanked Mr. Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning, Mr. Todd Booth, Engineer and GIS Supervisor, Mr. Gary Coleman, GIS Coordinator and Ms. Judith Stokes for all the work involved in this ordinance preparation. Supervisor Moore inquired if a letter concerning the change to the forty - seven people in the Cave Spring district would be sent with Ms. Stokes responding they would receive new voting cards. There were no citizens to speak on this item. Chairman Church advised if you look at the one person one vote and take that to heart and take approximately 800 inmates in the Western Virginia Regional Jail and hundreds of students at Hollins University, it probably brings everything in line. ORDINANCE 051011 -7 REAPPORTIONING THE REPRESENTATION IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, BY ALTERING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE ELECTION DISTRICTS, BY ESTABLISHING VOTING PRECINCTS THEREFOR, INCORPORATING A MAP SHOWING THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID DISTRICTS AND PRECINCTS, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE WHEREAS, on May 10, 2011, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County held a public hearing to receive comments on developing guidelines for the redistricting of Roanoke County in accordance with the decennial census; and WHEREAS, on March 8, 2011, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County adopted Guidelines for the 2011 Redistricting of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, on March 8, 2011, March 29, 2011 and April 12, 2011, the Board of Supervisors held work sessions on various redistricting options; and WHEREAS, legal notice of a public hearing concerning the adoption of an ordinance establishing magisterial districts for the County of Roanoke was provided as required by law; and WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held April 26, 2011; and the second reading and public hearing was held on May 10, 2011; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of SUPERVISORS of Roanoke County, as follows: 1. That there shall be established in Roanoke County five magisterial or election districts to be known and designated as follows: Catawba Magisterial District Hollins Magisterial District Vinton Magisterial District May 10, 2011 273 Cave Spring Magisterial District Windsor Hills Magisterial District from each of which there shall be elected one member of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County; and 2. That the outside boundaries of the five magisterial districts shall be as follows Catawba Magisterial District Beginning at the common corner between Roanoke /Craig /Montgomery counties; thence with the line between Roanoke /Craig counties along the crest of North and Brush Mountains in a northeasterly direction to the common corner in the line between Roanoke /Craig /Botetourt counties; thence with the line between Roanoke /Botetourt counties in a southeasterly direction to Interstate 81; thence with Interstate 81 in a westerly direction to its intersection with Interstate 581; thence in a southerly direction with Interstate 581 to its intersection with Woodhaven Road (Route 628); thence in a southeasterly direction with Woodhaven Road (Route 628) to its intersection with Peters Creek Road (Route 117), said point being on the northerly corporate boundary of the City of Roanoke and the northerly right -of -way of Peters Creek Road (Route 117); thence in the southwesterly direction of Peters Creek Road (Route 117) and with the City of Roanoke corporate line to its intersection with Cove Road (Route 116); thence with Cove Road (Route 116) and with the City of Roanoke corporate line in a westerly and southwesterly direction to its intersection with the east corporate line of the City of Salem; thence with the east corporate line of the City of Salem in a northwesterly direction to Electric Road (Route 419); thence with the east corporate line of the City of Salem and Electric Road (Route 419) to Interstate 81 and the north corporate line of the City of Salem; thence with the north corporate line of the City of Salem and Interstate81 in a southwesterly direction into the west corporate line of the City of Salem; thence with the corporate line of the City of Salem in a southerly direction to a point of intersection with Twelve O'Clock Knob Road (Route 694); thence in a southerly direction with Twelve O'Clock Knob Road (Route 694) to a point where it intersects with a gas transmission line at the crest of Twelve O'Clock Knob (elevation 2683); thence with the crest of Twelve O'Clock Knob and with the crest of Poor Mountain, the dividing line between the Catawba and the Windsor Hills Magisterial Districts, in a westerly and southwesterly direction to its intersection with Poor Mountain Road (Route 612); thence following the ridge line of Poor Mountain in generally southwesterly direction to a point of intersection with Honeysuckle Road (Route 916) at the Roanoke /Montgomery County line; thence with the Roanoke /Montgomery County line in a northerly direction to the place of beginning. Windsor Hills Magisterial District Beginning at a point on the east side of Electric Road (Route 419) and the north side of Keagy Road (Route 685) a common corner on the City of Salem /City of Roanoke /Roanoke County boundary; thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the east side of Electric Road (Route 419) in a south - southeasterly 274 May 10, 2011 direction to the intersection of Glen Heather Road (Route 713); thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the south side of Glen Heather Road (Route 713) in an easterly direction to the intersection with Grandin Road Extension; thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the south side of Grandin Road Extension in an easterly direction to the west outside boundary of Taryn Hill Subdivision; thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke to Garst Mill Road (Route 682); thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the south side of Garst Mill Road (Route 682) in an east - northeasterly direction to the intersection of Grandin Road Extension; thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the south side of Grandin Road Extension in an easterly direction to the center of Mudlick Creek; thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke to Brambleton Avenue (Route 221); thence leaving the corporate line of the City of Roanoke and with Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) in a southwesterly direction to Poage Valley Road Extension (Route 690); thence southerly with Poage Valley Road Extension (Route 690) to Dawnwood Road (Route 691); thence with Dawnwood Road (Route 691) in a southerly direction to the Roanoke /Franklin county line; thence with the Roanoke /Franklin county line as it meanders in a southwesterly direction along the crest of Blue Ridge Mountains to its intersection with the Roanoke /Floyd county line; thence with the Roanoke /Floyd county line westerly to its intersection with the common corner of the Roanoke /Montgomery /Floyd county line; thence with the Roanoke /Montgomery county line in a northerly direction to the crest of Poor Mountain at its intersection with Honeysuckle Road (Route 916); thence along the crest of Poor Mountain in a generally northeasterly direction thence continuing along the crest of Poor Mountain and Twelve O'Clock Knob to a point where a gas transmission line crosses the crest of TwelveO'Clock Knob (elevation 2683) at Twelve O'Clock Knob Road (Route 695); thence with Twelve O'Clock Knob Road (Route 694) in a northerly direction to its intersection with the corporate line of the City of Salem; thence with the corporate line of the City of Salem in an easterly and northerly direction to Keagy Road (Route 685); thence in a northerly and easterly direction with Keagy Road (Route 685) to its intersection with Electric Road (Route 419) to place of beginning. Cave Spring Magisterial District Beginning at a point where Yellow Mountain Road (Route 668) crosses the Blue Ridge Parkway; thence in a southerly direction until Yellow Mountain Road (Route 668) intersects Mayland Road (Route 667); thence in a southeasterly direction with Mayland Road (Route 667) to its intersection with Bandy Road (Route 666); thence in a northerly direction with Bandy Road (Route 666) to its intersection with Old Virginia Springs Road (Route 667); thence in a southeasterly direction with Old Virginia Springs Road (Route 667), extended to the Roanoke /Franklin county line; thence with the Roanoke /Franklin county line in a southwest to northwest direction as it meanders along the crest of the Blue Ridge Mountains to a point where Dawnwood Road (Route 691) crosses said Roanoke /Franklin county line; thence in a northerly direction with the Dawnwood Road (Route 691) to its point of intersection with Poage Valley Road May 10, 2011 275 Extension (Route 690); thence with Poage Valley Road Extension (Route 690) in a northerly direction to its intersection with Bent Mountain Road (Route 221); thence in a northeasterly direction with Bent Mountain Road (Route 221) to a point where said route enters the City of Roanoke; thence with the corporate line of the City of Roanoke in a southeasterly and easterly direction until it intersects with the western side of Yellow Mountain Road (Route 668) at the place of beginning. Hollins Magisterial District Beginning at a point of intersection of Interstate 81 and the Roanoke /Botetourt county line; thence with Interstate 81 in a westerly direction to its intersection with Interstate 581; thence in a southerly direction with Interstate 581 to Woodhaven Road (Route 628); thence in a southerly direction with Woodhaven Road (Route 628) to its intersection with Peters Creek Road (Route 117) and the corporate line of the City of Roanoke; thence in an easterly and southerly direction with the corporate line of the City of Roanoke to a point of intersection with Challenger Avenue (Route 460); thence in a northeasterly direction with Challenger Avenue (Route 460) to its intersection with the Roanoke /Botetourt county line; thence in a northerly and westerly direction with the Roanoke /Botetourt county line to the place of beginning. 3. That the outside boundaries of the thirty -two voting precincts shall be as follows: BENNETT SPRINGS PRECINCT — 107 Beginning at a point on the Roanoke /Montgomery county line at the top of Catawba Mountain; thence with the crest of Catawba Mountain in an easterly direction to the top of McAfee Knob; thence with the crest of Tinker Mountain in an easterly direction to the Roanoke /Botetourt county line; thence with the Roanoke /Botetourt county line in a southeasterly direction to Interstate 81; thence west with Interstate 81 to its intersection with Interstate 581, thence north with Interstate 581 to its intersection with Loch Haven Lake Drive; thence north with Loch Haven Lake Drive to Timberview Road (Route 1404); thence in a westerly direction with Timberview Road (Route 1404) to the Western Virginia Water Authority (Carvins Cove Reservoir) west property line; thence north with the Western Virginia Water Authority (Carvins Cove Reservoir) west property line to the topographic crest of Brushy Mountain; thence with the crest of Brushy Mountain in a southwesterly direction crossing Mason Creek to the intersection of Catawba Valley Drive (Route 311) at its intersection with Dutch Oven Road (Route 863); thence north with Route 311 to Plunkett Road (Route 874); thence west with Plunkett Road (Route 874), to a point where Mason Creek crosses under Plunkett Road (Route 874); thence in a north - northwesterly direction with Mason Creek to its intersection with Old Catawba Road (Route 864); thence south with Old Catawba Road (Route 864) to its intersection with Bradshaw Road (Route 622); thence with Bradshaw Road (Route 622) in a westerly direction to the Roanoke/ Montgomery county line; thence with the Roanoke /Montgomery county line in a northwesterly direction to the place of beginning. Catawba Magisterial District Mason Cove Fire Station - Voting Place 276 May 10, 2011 BENT MOUNTAIN PRECINCT - 301 Beginning on the Roanoke /Montgomery county line at the top of Poor Mountain at the intersection of Honeysuckle Road (Route 916); thence following the ridge line of Poor Mountain in a generally northeasterly direction to its intersection with Poor Mountain Road (Route 612); thence continuing in a generally southwesterly direction with Poor Mountain Road (Route 612), down the slope of Poor Mountain to an elevation of 2800 feet; thence following the 2800 feet contour elevation of Poor and Bent Mountains in a generally southern direction to the contours point of intersection with the AEP Company high tension Roanoke - Claytor transmission line; thence easterly with the AEP Company high tension Roanoke - Claytor transmission line down the slope of Bent Mountain to the topographic elevation 2000 feet at a branch of Back Creek; thence with the topographic elevation 2000 feet in a southeasterly direction with the base of Bent Mountain to Dividing Spring Branch; thence southerly with Dividing Spring Branch as it meanders to the Roanoke /Franklin county line at Slings Gap; thence with the Roanoke /Franklin county line in a westerly - southwesterly direction to the Roanoke /Floyd county line; thence with the Roanoke /Floyd county line westerly to the Roanoke /Floyd /Montgomery county line; thence with the Roanoke /Montgomery county line in a northerly direction to the place of beginning. Windsor Hills Magisterial District Bent Mountain Fire Station - Voting Place BONSACK PRECINCT — 402 Beginning at a point on the intersection of the Blue Ridge Parkway and the Roanoke /Botetourt county line; thence in a southwesterly direction with the Blue Ridge Parkway to the topographic crest of Stewart's Knob; thence with the topographic crest of Stewart's Knob in a westerly direction to a point on the east corporate line of the City of Roanoke; thence with the east corporate line of the City of Roanoke in a north - northwesterly direction to its intersection with Challenger Avenue (Route 460); thence in a northeasterly direction to the Roanoke /Botetourt county line; thence with the Roanoke /Botetourt county line to the place of beginning. Vinton Magisterial District Bonsack United Methodist Church —Voting Place BOTETOURT SPRINGS PRECINCT - 204 Beginning at the intersection of Interstate 81 and Deer Branch Creek; thence south with Deer Branch Creek to Peters Creek Road (Route 117); thence with Peters Creek Road (Route 117) in a westerly direction to its intersection with Wood Haven Road (Route 628); thence with Wood Haven Road (Route 628) west to its intersection with Interstate 581; thence north with Interstate 581 to Interstate 81; thence east with Interstate 81 to the place of beginning. Hollins Magisterial District Life Church - Voting Place BURLINGTON PRECINCT- 202 May 10, 2011 277 Beginning at a point at the intersection of Williamson Road (Route 11) and Peters Creek Road (Route 117); thence west with Peters Creek Road (Route 117) to its intersection with Wood Haven Road (Route 628) and the north corporate limit of the City of Roanoke; thence with the north corporate limit of the City of Roanoke in an east /southeasterly direction to Florist Road (Route 623); thence with Florist Road (Route 623) leaving the north corporate limit of the City of Roanoke in a northerly direction to Williamson Road (Route 11); thence north with Williamson Road (Route 11) to the place of beginning. Hollins Magisterial District Burlington Elementary School - Voting Place CASTLE ROCK PRECINCT -305 Beginning at a point at the intersection of Electric Road (Route 419) and Brambleton Avenue (Route 221); thence southwesterly with Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) to its intersection with Ran Lynn Drive (Route 745); thence in a northwesterly direction with Ran Lynn Drive (Route 745) to its intersection with South Roselawn Road (State Route 690); thence with South Roselawn Road (Route 690) in a northeasterly direction to its intersection with Roselawn Road (Route 689); thence in a northerly direction with Roselawn Road (Route 689) to the crossing location of the AEP Company high tension Glen Lynn- Hancock Electric Transmission line; thence with Appalachian Power Company high tension Glen Lyn- Hancock Electric Transmission line in a northeasterly direction to its intersection with Brahma Road (Route 1687); thence northwest with Brahma Road (Route 1687) to Longhorn Road (Route 1688); thence north with Longhorn Road (Route 1688) to Castle Rock Road (Route 702); thence in a westerly direction with Castle Rock Road (Route 702) to Stoneybrook Drive (Route 1316); thence north /northeasterly with Stoneybrook Drive (Route 1316) to Electric Road (Route 419); thence in a southeasterly /easterly direction with Electric Road (Route 419) to its intersection with Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) being the place of beginning. Windsor Hills Magisterial District Cave Spring Baptist Church - Voting Place CATAWBA PRECINCT - 101 Beginning at the common corner between Roanoke /Craig /Montgomery counties; thence with the line between Roanoke /Craig counties along the crest of North and Brush Mountains in a northeasterly direction to the common corner in the line between Roanoke /Craig /Botetourt counties; thence with the line between Roanoke /Botetourt counties in a southeasterly direction to the crest of Tinker Mountain; thence with the crest of Tinker Mountain in a westerly direction to the top of McAfee Knob on Catawba Mountain; thence continuing in a westerly direction with the crest of Catawba Mountain to the Roanoke /Montgomery county line; thence with the Roanoke /Montgomery county line in a northerly direction to the place of beginning. Catawba Magisterial District Catawba Recreation Center - Voting Place CAVE SPRING PRECINCT - 503 278 May 10, 2011 Beginning at a point at the intersection of Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) and Colonial Avenue (Route 720); thence east with Colonial Avenue (Route 720) to Penn Forest Boulevard (Route 687); thence continuing east with Penn Forest Boulevard (Route 687) to Chaparral Drive (Route 800); thence southwest with Chaparral Drive (Route 800) to Merriman Road (Route 613); thence with Merriman Road (Route 613) southeasterly to Cartwright Drive (Route 1726); thence with Cartwright Drive (Route 1726) in a southwesterly direction to Crystal Creek Drive (Route 897); thence with Crystal Creek Drive (Route 897) in a westerly direction to Brambleton Avenue (Route 221); thence with Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) in a northerly direction to the place of beginning. Cave Spring Magisterial District Church of the Holy Spirit - Voting Place CLEARBROOK PRECINCT - 505 Beginning at a point in the City of Roanoke corporate line where Franklin Road (Route 220) south exits the City; thence with the southerly corporate boundary of the City of Roanoke in the northeasterly direction to a point where it intersects Yellow Mountain Road (Route 668); thence in a southerly direction until Yellow Mountain Road (Route 668) intersects Mayland Road (Route 667); thence in a southeasterly direction with Mayland Road (Route 667) until it intersects with Bandy Road (Route 666); thence in a northeasterly direction with Bandy Road (y Route 666) to its intersection with Old Virginia Springs Road (Route 667); thence southeasterly with Old Virginia Springs Road(Route 667) extended to the Franklin County line at the crest of the Blue Ridge Mountains; thence with the Roanoke /Franklin county line in a southwesterly to northwesterly direction as it meanders along the crest of the Blue Ridge Mountains to Merriman Road (Route 613); thence northerly along Merriman Road (Route 613) until it intersects the Blue Ridge Parkway; thence in a southeasterly and northeasterly direction with the Blue Ridge Parkway until it intersects Franklin Road (Route 220); thence northerly with Franklin Road (Route 220) to the place of beginning. Cave Spring Magisterial District Clearbrook Elementary School - Voting Place COTTON HILL PRECINCT - 501 Beginning at Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) at its intersection with Crystal Creek Drive (Route 897); thence with Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) in a southeasterly direction to Poage Valley Road Extension (Route 690); thence south with Poage Valley Road Extension (Route 690) to Dawnwood Road (Route 691); thence in a southerly direction with Dawnwood Road (Route 691), if extended would intersect to the Roanoke /Franklin county line; thence in an easterly direction with the crest of the Blue Ridge Mountains and the Roanoke /Franklin county line to Merriman Road (Route 613); thence in a northerly direction with Merriman Road (Route 613) through Starkey to Crystal Creek Drive (Route 897); thence with Crystal Creek Drive (Route 897) in a westerly direction to the point of beginning. Cave Spring Magisterial District Penn Forest Elementary School - Voting Place May 10, 2011 279 GARST MILL PRECINCT - 306 Beginning at a point on Electric Road (Route 419) where the west fork of Mud Lick Creek crosses Electric Road (Route 419); thence with the west fork of Mud Lick Creek as it meanders in a northeasterly direction to the southerly corporate line of the City of Roanoke; thence with the corporate line of the City of Roanoke in a northeasterly and southeasterly direction to a point where it crosses Brambleton Avenue (Route 221); thence with Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) in a southwesterly direction to its intersection with Electric Road (Route 419); thence with Electric Road (Route 419) in a northwesterly direction to the place of beginning. Windsor Hills Magisterial District 419 Library - Voting Place GLENVAR PRECINCT - 103 Beginning at a point on the Roanoke /Montgomery county line where Interstate 81 intersects that line; thence with the said Interstate 81 in a northeasterly direction to its intersection with the western most corner of the City of Salem corporate line; thence in a generally northeasterly direction with the said City of Salem corporate line to a point where Butt Hollow Creek intersects said City of Salem corporate line; thence in a northerly direction with Butt Hollow Creek to its intersection with Texas Hollow Road (Route 641); thence in a northerly and easterly direction with Texas Hollow Road (Route 641) to its intersection with Paint Bank Road (Route 913); thence in a northwesterly direction with Paint Bank Road (Route 913) to its intersection with the AEP power line; thence following the AEP power line in an easterly direction to its intersection with Catawba Valley Drive (Route 311); thence in a northerly direction with Catawba Valley Drive (Route 311) to its intersection with the topographic crest of Fort Lewis Mountain; thence west with the topographic crest of Fort Lewis Mountain to its intersection with Forest Acre Trail (Route 700); thence with Forest Acre Trail (Route 700) back to the Lewis Mountain to its intersection with the Roanoke /Montgomery county line; thence with the Roanoke /Montgomery county line to the point of beginning. Catawba Magisterial District Glenvar Middle School — Voting Place GREEN HILL PRECINCT - 106 Beginning at a point on Interstate 81 at its intersection with the City of Salem corporate limits; thence with the west corporate line of the City of Salem in a southerly direction and with the south corporate line of the City of Salem in an easterly and southerly direction to its intersection with Twelve O'Clock Knob Road (Route 694); thence with Twelve O'Clock Knob Road (Route 694) in a southerly direction to a point where it intersects with a gas transmission line at the crest of Twelve O'Clock Knob; thence with the crest of Twelve O'Clock Knob and with the crest of Poor Mountain, the dividing line between Catawba and the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, in a westerly and southwesterly direction to the intersection of Poor Mountain Road (Route 612); thence following the crest of Poor Mountain in a generally southwesterly direction to its intersection with Honeysuckle Road (Route 916) on the Roanoke /Montgomery county 280 May 10, 2011 line; thence with the Roanoke /Montgomery county line in a northerly direction to Interstate 81; thence in a northeasterly direction with Interstate 81 to the point of beginning. Catawba Magisterial District Fort Lewis Baptist Church - Voting Place HOLLINS PRECINCT - 206 Beginning at the intersection of Interstate 81 and the Roanoke /Botetourt county Line; thence with Interstate 81 in a westerly direction to Deer Branch Creek; thence south with Deer Branch Creek as it meanders to Peters Creek Road (Route 117); thence easterly with Peters Creek Road (Route 117) to its intersection with Williamson Road (Route 11); thence in a southeasterly direction with Williamson Road (Route 11) to its intersection with Clubhouse Drive (Route 1821); thence in a southeasterly direction with Clubhouse Drive (Route 1821) extended until it intersects the east fork of Carvins Creek; thence northeasterly with Carvins Creek as it meanders until it intersects Plantation Road (Route 115); thence in a northwesterly direction with Plantation Road (Route 115) until it intersects Williamson Road (Route 11); thence with Williamson Road (Route 11) in a easterly direction until it intersects the Roanoke /Botetourt county line; thence with the Roanoke /Botetourt county line in a northwesterly direction to the place of beginning. Hollins Magisterial District Hollins Library - Voting Place HUNTING HILLS PRECINCT - 507 Beginning at a point where Electric Road (Route 419) intersects the corporate line of the City of Roanoke; thence in a southeasterly direction with the corporate line of the City of Roanoke and partially with Franklin Road (Route 220) to a point where the said Franklin Road (Route 220) intersects the Blue Ridge Parkway; thence with the Blue Ridge Parkway in a southwesterly and then northwesterly direction to its intersection with Merriman Road (Route 613); thence in a northerly direction with Merriman Road (Route 613) to Starkey Road (Route 904); thence in a northeasterly direction with Starkey Road (Route 904) to its intersection with the Norfolk Southern railway line; thence in a northerly direction with the Norfolk Southern railway line to its intersection with Benois Road (Route 633); thence in an easterly direction with Benois Road (Route 633) to its intersection with Starkey Road (Route 904); thence in a northerly direction with Starkey Road (Route 904) to its intersection with Electric Road (Route 419); thence in a northeasterly direction with Electric Road (Route 419) to the place of beginning. Cave Spring Magisterial District Celebration Church of God - Voting Place LINDENWOOD PRECINCT - 405 Beginning at a point of intersection of the east corporate limit of the City of Roanoke and the topographic crest of Stewart's Knob; thence in a northeasterly direction with the topographic crest of Stewart's Knob to the Blue Ridge Parkway; thence in a northeasterly direction with the Blue Ridge Parkway to the Roanoke /Botetourt county May 10, 2011 28 line; thence south with the Roanoke /Botetourt county line to its intersection with the Roanoke /Botetourt /Bedford county line; thence with the Roanoke /Bedford county line in a southerly direction to the Roanoke River; thence west with the Roanoke River to Wolf Creek at the east corporate limit of the Town of Vinton; thence north with Wolf Creek and the east corporate limit of the Town of Vinton to the City of Roanoke corporate line; thence in a northerly direction with the City of Roanoke corporate line to the place of beginning. Vinton Magisterial District William Byrd High School - Voting Place MASON VALLEY PRECINCT - 102 Beginning at a point on the Roanoke /Montgomery county line at its intersection with Bradshaw Road (Route 622); thence in an easterly direction with Bradshaw Road (Route 622) to its intersection with Old Catawba Road (Route 864); thence north with Old Catawba Road (Route 864) to its intersection with Mason Creek; thence with Mason Creek in a southerly direction to its intersection with Plunkett Road (Route 874); thence in an easterly direction with Plunkett Road (Route 874) to its intersection with Catawba Valley Road (Route 311); thence in a southerly direction with Catawba Valley Road (Route 311) to the topographic crest of Fort Lewis Mountain; thence leaving Catawba Valley Road (Route 311) with the topographic crest of Fort Lewis Mountain to its intersection with Forest Acre Trail (Route 700); thence in a westerly direction with Forest Acre Trail (Route 700) back to its intersection with the topographic crest of Fort Lewis Mountain; thence with topographic crest of Fort Lewis Mountain in a westerly direction to the Roanoke /Montgomery county line; thence with the Roanoke /Montgomery county line in a northwesterly direction to the place of beginning. Catawba Magisterial District Mason Cove Elementary School - Voting Place MOUNTAIN VIEW PRECINCT - 203 Beginning at a point on the Roanoke /Botetourt County line at its intersection with Williamson Road (Route 11); thence in a westerly direction with Williamson Road (Route 11) to its intersection with Plantation Road (Route 115); thence in a southerly direction with Plantation Road (Route 115) to a point where it intersects with the north corporate line of the City of Roanoke; thence northeasterly with the corporate line of the City of Roanoke as it meanders until it intersects with Read Mountain Road (Route 611); thence in an easterly direction with Read Mountain Road (Route 611) until it intersects with the crest of Read Mountain Extended; thence northeasterly with the crest of Read Mountain until it intersects with the Roanoke /Botetourt county line; thence northwesterly with the said Roanoke /Botetourt county line to the place of beginning. Hollins Magisterial District Mountain View Elementary School - Voting Place MOUNT VERNON PRECINCT -506 Beginning at a point on Colonial Avenue (Route 720) and the south corporate limit of the City of Roanoke; thence with Colonial Avenue (Route 720) in a southwesterly 282 May 10, 2011 direction to Brambleton Avenue (Route 221); thence in a northeasterly direction with Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) to the south corporate limit of the City of Roanoke; thence with the south corporate limit of the City of Roanoke in a southeasterly direction to the place of beginning. NORTHSIDE PRECINCT - 104 Beginning at a point at the intersection of Peters Creek Road (Route 117) and Wood Haven Road (Route 628); thence in a northwesterly direction with Wood Haven Road (Route 628) to its intersection with Green Ridge Road (Route 629); thence in a southerly direction with Green Ridge Road (Route 629) to its intersection with Twilight Road (Route 1577); thence in an easterly direction with Twilight Road (Route 1577) to its intersection with North Lake Drive (Route 1524); thence in a southeasterly direction with North Lake Drive (Route 1524) to its intersection with Peters Creek Road (Route 117); thence east with Peters Creek Road (Route 117) to the place of beginning. Catawba Magisterial District Northside High School - Voting Place NORTH VINTON PRECINCT - 403 Beginning at the east corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the west corporate line of the Town of Vinton at Virginia Avenue; thence with the corporate line of the City of Roanoke ; thence with the northeasterly corporate line of the Town of Vinton to its intersection with Mountain View Road (Route 651); thence with the corporate line of the Town of Vinton in a southerly easterly direction until its intersection with Washington Avenue; thence with Washington Avenue in a westerly direction to South Pollard Street; thence with South Pollard Street in a southwesterly direction to Virginia Avenue at First Street; thence with Virginia Avenue in a westerly direction to the place of beginning. Vinton Magisterial District Vinton Baptist Church - Voting Place OAK GROVE PRECINCT - 304 Beginning at a point on the east side of Electric Road (Route 419) and on the north side of Keagy Road (Highway 685) being a point on the Roanoke County /City of Salem /City of Roanoke boundary; thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the east side of Electric Road (Route 419) in a south - southeasterly direction to the intersection with Stoneybrook Drive (Route 1316); thence in a southwesterly direction with Stoneybrook Drive (Route 1316) to Castle Rock Road (Route 702); thence in an easterly direction with Castle Rock Road (Route 702) to Longhorn Road (Route 1688); thence south with Longhorn Road (Route 1688) to Brahma Road (Route 1689); thence southeast with Brahma Road (Route 1689) to the crossing of the AEP Company high tension Glen Lyn- Hancock electric transmission line; thence with the AEP Company high tension Glen Lyn- Hancock electric transmission line in a southwesterly direction to Roselawn Road (Route 689); thence northwest with Roselawn Road (Route 689) to Mount Chestnut Road (Route 692); thence west with Mount Chestnut Road (Route 692) to the crossing location of a gas pipeline; thence with this gas pipeline in a northerly and then westerly direction to its intersection with the crest of Twelve O'Clock Knob at May 10, 2011 283 Twelve O'Clock Knob Road (Route 694); thence with Twelve O'Clock Knob Road (Route 694) in a northerly direction to the corporate line of the City of Salem; thence with the corporate line of the City of Salem in an easterly direction to the place of beginning. Windsor Hills Magisterial District Oak Grove Elementary School - Voting Place OGDEN PRECINCT - 504 Beginning at a point on Colonial Avenue (Route 720) and the south corporate limit of the City of Roanoke; thence with Colonial Avenue (Route 720) in a southwesterly direction to Penn Forest Boulevard (Route 687); thence east with Penn Forest Boulevard (Route 687) to Starkey Road (Route 904); thence northeast with Starkey Road (Route 904) to Electric Road (Route 419); thence northeast with Electric Road (Route 419) to the south corporate limit of the City of Roanoke; thence north and westerly with the south corporate limit of the City of Roanoke to the place of beginning. Cave Spring Magisterial District Green Valley Elementary School - Voting Place ORCHARDS PRECINCT - 205 Beginning at a point of intersection of the Roanoke /Botetourt county line and Challenger Avenue (Route 460); thence in a southwesterly direction with Challenger Avenue (Route 460) to a point on the east corporate line of the City of Roanoke; thence with the east corporate line of the City of Roanoke in a north - northwesterly direction to its intersection with Read Mountain Road (Route 611); thence in a westerly direction with Read Mountain Road (Route 611) until it intersects with the crest of Read Mountain extended; thence northeasterly with the crest of Read Mountain until it intersects with the Roanoke /Botetourt county line; thence southeasterly with the Roanoke /Botetourt county line to the place of beginning. Hollins Magisterial District Bonsack Baptist Church - Voting Place PENN FOREST PRECINCT - 502 Beginning at a point at the intersection of Penn Forest Boulevard (Route 687) and Chaparral Drive (Route 800); thence with Chaparral Drive (Route 800) in a southwesterly direction to Merriman Road (Route 613); thence southeasterly with Merriman Road (Route 613) to Cartwright Drive (Route 1726); thence in a southwesterly direction with Cartwright Drive (Route 1726) to Crystal Creek Drive (Route 897); thence east with Crystal Creek Drive (Route 897) to Merriman Road (Route 613); thence with Merriman Road (Route 613) in a southeasterly direction to Starkey Road (Route 904); thence in a northeasterly direction with Starkey Road (Route 904) to its intersection with the Norfolk Southern railway line; thence north with the Norfolk Southern railway line to its intersection with Benois Road (Route 633); thence in an easterly direction to Starkey Road (Route 904); thence in a northerly direction with Starkey Road (Route 904) to Penn Forest Boulevard (Route 687); thence with Penn Forest Boulevard (Route 687) in a westerly direction to the place of beginning. 284 May 10, 2011 Cave Spring Magisterial District Cave Spring High School - Voting Place PETERS CREEK PRECINCT - 105 Beginning at the intersection of Wood Haven Road (Route 628) and Interstate 581; thence north with Interstate 581 crossing Interstate 81 to its intersection with Loch Haven Lake Drive; thence northerly with Loch Haven Lake Drive to its intersection with Timberview Road (Route 1404); thence in a westerly direction with Timberview Road (Route 1404) to the Western Virginia Water Authority (Carvins Cove Reservior) west property line; thence north with the Western Virginia Water Authority (Carvins Cove Reservoir) west property line to the topographic crest of Brushy Mountain; thence with the topographic crest of Brushy Mountain in a southwesterly direction crossing Mason Creek to the intersection of Catawba Valley Road (Route 311), Dutch Oven Road (Route 863), and the AEP power line; thence in a westerly direction with the AEP power line to its intersection with the east fork of Dry Branch; thence with the hollow which is the east fork of Dry Branch in a southerly direction as it meanders to a point where Dry Branch divides into an east and west fork at the north corporate line of the City of Salem; thence with the north corporate line of the City of Salem and in a generally northeasterly direction to its intersection with Electric Road (Route 419); thence with the east corporate line of the City of Salem in a south and then northeasterly direction to a point on the City of Salem, Roanoke County, and City of Roanoke line at Green Ridge Road (Route 629); thence in a northeasterly direction with Green Ridge Road (Route 629) to its intersection with Cove Road (Route 780); thence in an easterly direction with Cove Road (Route 780) to its intersection with Peters Creek Road (Route 117): thence in a northeasterly direction with Peters Creek Road (Route 117) to its intersection with North Lake Drive (Route 1524); thence in a northwesterly direction with North Lake Drive (Route 1524) to its intersection with Twilight Road (Route 1577); thence in a westerly direction with Twilight Road (Route 1577) to its intersection with Green Ridge Road (Route 629); thence north with Green Ridge Road (Route 629) to its intersection with Wood Haven Road (Route 628); thence east with Wood Haven Road (Route 628) to the place of beginning. Catawba Magisterial District Glen Cove Elementary School - Voting Place PLANTATION PRECINCT - 201 Beginning at a point where Williamson Road (Route 11) intersects Clubhouse Drive (Route 1821); thence southeasterly with Williamson Road (Route 11) until it intersects Florist Road (Route 623); thence in a southeasterly direction with Florist Road (Route 623) until it intersects the north corporate line of the City of Roanoke; thence in an easterly direction with the north corporate line of the City of Roanoke until it intersects Plantation Road (Route 115); thence in a northwesterly direction with Plantation Road (Route 115) to a point where the said road intersects the east fork of Carvins Creek; thence with the east fork of Carvins Creek in a southwesterly direction as it meanders to a point opposite the center line extended of Clubhouse Drive (Route 1821); thence May 10, 2011 285 northwesterly with the center line of Clubhouse Drive (Route 1821) to its intersection with Williamson Road (Route 11) the place of beginning. Hollins Magisterial District Roanoke Valley Christian Schools - Voting Place POAGES MILL PRECINCT - 302 Beginning at the intersection of Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) and Ran Lynn Drive (Route 745); thence in a northwesterly direction with Ran Lynn Drive (Route 745) to its intersection with South Roselawn Road (Route 690); thence with South Roselawn Road (Route 690) in a northeasterly direction to its intersection with Roselawn Road (Route 689); thence in a northwesterly direction with Roselawn Road (Route 689) to Mount Chestnut Drive (Route 692); thence west with Mount Chestnut Drive (Route 692) to the crossing location of a gas pipeline, thence with this gas pipeline in a northerly then westerly direction to its intersection with the crest of Twelve O'Clock Knob; thence with the topographic crest of Twelve O'Clock Knob and Poor Mountain in a westerly - southwesterly direction to Poor Mountain Road (Route 612); thence in a generally southwesterly direction with Poor Mountain Road (Route 612) down the slope of Poor Mountain to an elevation of 2800 feet; thence following the 2800 -foot contour elevation of Poor and Bent Mountains in a generally southern direction to the contours point of intersection with AEP Company high- tension Roanoke - Claytor transmission line; thence easterly with the AEP Company high tension Roanoke - Claytor transmission line down the slope of Bent Mountain to the topographic elevation 2,000 feet at a branch of Back Creek; thence with the topographic elevation 2,000 feet as it traverses in a southeasterly direction with the base of Bent Mountain to Dividing Spring Branch; thence southerly with Dividing Spring Branch as it meanders to the Roanoke /Franklin county line; thence with the Roanoke /Franklin county line easterly to its intersection with Dawnwood Road (Route 691); thence in a northerly direction with Dawnwood Road (Route 691) to its intersection with Poage Valley Road Extension (Route 690); thence in a northerly direction with Poage Valley Road Extension (Route 690) to the intersection of Route 221; thence with Route 221 to the place of beginning. Windsor Hills Magisterial District Back Creek Elementary School - Voting Place SOUTH VINTON PRECINCT - 404 Beginning at the east corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the west corporate line of the Town of Vinton at Virginia Avenue; thence with Virginia Avenue in an easterly direction to South Pollard Street at First Street; thence with South Pollard Street in a northerly direction to Washington Avenue; thence with Washington Avenue in an easterly direction to Wolf Creek being the east corporate line of the Town of Vinton; thence with Wolf Creek and the east corporate line of the Town of Vinton in a southerly direction to the Roanoke River; thence in a westerly direction with the Roanoke River and the south corporate line of the Town of Vinton to Tinker Creek being the east corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the west corporate line of the Town of Vinton; thence with Tinker Creek in a northwesterly direction to the place of beginning. 286 May 10, 2011 Vinton Magisterial District Charles R. Hill Senior Center - Voting Place WILDWOOD PRECINCT — 108 Beginning at a point where Butt Hollow Creek intersects Interstate 81 and the City of Salem corporate line; thence in a generally northeasterly direction with the said City of Salem corporate line to a point where Dry Branch forks into an easterly and westerly fork; thence with the easterly fork of the said Dry Branch as it meanders in generally a northwesterly direction to where this branch or hollow intersects with the AEP power line; thence following the AEP power line in a westerly direction to its intersection with Paint Bank Road (Route 913); thence in a southeasterly direction with Paint Bank Road (Route 913) to its intersection with Texas Hollow Road (Route 641); thence in a westerly and then southerly direction with Texas Hollow Road (Route 641) to its intersection with Butt Hollow Creek; thence in a southerly direction with said Butt Hollow Creek to the place of beginning. Catawba Magisterial District Fort Lewis Elementary School — Voting Place WINDSOR HILLS PRECINCT - 303 Beginning at the City of Roanoke corporate line where Electric Road (Route 419) intersects Glen Heather Drive (Route 713); thence easterly then southerly with the corporate line of the City of Roanoke to a point where the said corporate line intersects Mud Lick Creek; thence with the west fork of Mud Lick Creek as it meanders in a southwesterly direction to Electric Road (Route 419); thence north with Electric Road (Route 419); to the place of beginning. Windsor Hills Magisterial District Our Lady of Nazareth Catholic Church - Voting Place 4. That certified copies of this ordinance shall be mailed by the Clerk to the local electoral board, the Secretary of the Commonwealth, the State Board of Elections, and the Division of Legislative Services. 5. That this ordinance shall be effective from and after the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Moore to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Altizer, Elswick, Church NAYS: Supervisor Flora IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Elswick stated he would like to congratulate Kroger on modifying the places for people who embark from wheelchair vans when they come to the store. Kristine Roberts had asked him to take a look at this issue because the May 10, 2011 287 spaces were not wide enough and she had actually been hit by another motorist when she was embarking from her van. He advised he called the Kroger main office and before they had a chance to return his call, Kroger had fixed the problem and enlarged the spaces and repainted them and he wanted to let Kroger know it was appreciated. Supervisor Elswick asked for the Board's approval for Roanoke County to opt in to the Department of Game and Inland Fisheries Urban Archery Program, which is a program that allows homeowners to hunt in urban areas to help control the deer population. He advised it would not take effect this hunting season, but next year. He would like the Board's agreement to pursue the issue with the Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. Chairman Church requested Mr. Goodman and Mr. Mahoney to look into this issue. Supervisor Moore thanked everyone for the emails she received on recycling and air pollution in Roanoke County; noted she appreciate the input. Supervisor Church welcomed Robatel to Roanoke County stating he had joined Supervisor Moore at the ribbon cutting this morning, another growing concern in Roanoke County. In addition, he stated he had attended a Roanoke Regional Housing Symposium at the Vinton War Memorial "Livable Communities ". He advised he wanted to thank Nicole Pendleton. There was a guest speaker, the world renowned poet, Nikki Giovanni from Virginia Tech who did an outstanding job. Chairman Church stated he was there and spoke on behalf of Roanoke County. He noted what they are doing down there and what the region is doing with all the citizens and business leaders taking part is uplifting. Additionally, Chairman Church thanked Amanda Micklow for heading up the Glenvar Community Planning Session, noting there have been four (4) or five (5) work sessions all across the Glenvar area. The citizens have done a fantastic job to shape the Glenvar community the way they want it to be to get the zoning designations in the proper prospective. IN RE: ADJOURNMENT Chairman Church adjourned the meeting at 7:25 p.m. bmitted by: Approved by: j C�L Deborah C. acks 9 Jos4 4 hB. "Butch" Church Clerk to the Boar Chairman 1 May 10, 2011 PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY