Loading...
7/23/2013 - Regular (3)June 25, 2013 239 Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of June 2013. Audio and video recordings of this meeting will be held on file for a minimum of five (5) years in the office of the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES Before the meeting was called Reverend Ray Robinette of Grace Bible Church by all present. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER taken. to order an invocation was given by . The Pledge of Allegiance was recited Chairman Altizer called the meeting to order at 6:33 p.m. The roll call was MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Michael W. Altizer; Supervisors Joseph B. "Butch" Church, Eddie "Ed" Elswick, Richard C. Flora and Charlotte A. Moore MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: B. Clayton Goodman III, County Administrator; Daniel R. O'Donnell, Assistant County Administrator; Richard Caywood, Assistant County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; and Deborah C. Jacks, Clerk to the Board IN RE: CLOSED MEETING At 6:34 p.m., Chairman Altizer moved to go into closed meeting following the work session pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.2 -3711 A 5. — Discussion concerning a prospective business or industry or the expansion of an existing business or industry where no previous announcement has been made of the business' or industry's interest in locating or expanding its facilities in the County. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: 240 June 25, 2013 AYES: Supervisors Moore, Flora, Church, Elswick, Altizer NAYS: None The closed session was held from 6:37 p.m. until 6:53.p.m. IN RE: CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION At 6:59 p.m., Chairman Altizer moved to return to open session and adopt the certification resolution. RESOLUTION 062513 -1 CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.2 -3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each member's knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies; and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Altizer to adopt the resolution and carried by the following roll call and recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Flora, Church, Elswick, Altizer NAYS: None IN RE: PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Virginia Western Community College (VWCC) recognition of contributions to the Community College Access Program (CCAP) (B. Clayton Goodman III, County Administrator) In attendance for this recognition were Dr. Angela Salconetti, Vice President of Institutional Advancement at Virginia Western and Tracy Smith, Chief June 25, 2013 241 Financial Officer of Optical Cable. All Supervisors offered their thanks to both Virginia Western and Optical Cable. 2. Resolution expressing the appreciation of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to Rodney P. Ferguson, Jr., Battalion Chief — Training upon his retirement after more than thirty -one (31) years of service (Richard E. Burch, Jr., Chief of Fire and Rescue) In attendance for this recognition were Rodney Ferguson, his wife Sheila and his daughter Taylor. All Supervisors offered their thanks and congratulations. RESOLUTION 062513 -2 EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO RODNEY P. FERGUSON, JR., BATTALION CHIEF - TRAINING, UPON HIS RETIREMENT AFTER MORE THAN THIRTY -ONE (31) YEARS OF SERVICE WHEREAS, Rodney P. Ferguson, Jr. was hired on January 1, 1982, and has worked as an Animal Control Officer, Firefighter, Fire Inspector, Fire Lieutenant, Prevention Captain, Operations Captain, Battalion Chief — Operations, and Battalion Chief — Training during his tenure with Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, Mr. Ferguson retired on June 1, 2013, after thirty -one (31) years and five (5) months of devoted, faithful and expert service with the County; and WHEREAS, during his time serving Roanoke County, Chief Ferguson throughout his tenure with Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department was a mentor to fellow employees; and WHEREAS, Chief Ferguson was a leader in arson investigation for Roanoke County along with providing assistance to neighboring jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, Chief Ferguson was instrumental in the development and construction of the burn building at the Roanoke Regional Fire -EMS Training Center as the project manager; and WHEREAS, Chief Ferguson implemented enhanced fire -EMS training for all of the Department which incorporated firefighter survivability during May -Day situations where loss of life or serious injury for a firefighter is the greatest; and WHEREAS, his devotion to training both for himself and others will be his lasting legacy on county emergency personnel; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to RODNEY P. FERGUSON, JR. for more than thirty - one (31) years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County; and 242 June 25, 2013 FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy and productive retirement. On motion of Supervisor Altizer to adopt the resolution and carried by the following roll call and recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Flora, Church, Elswick, Altizer NAYS: None 3. Recognition of Dr. Gerald "Wook" Beltran, Operational Medical Director for the Fire and Rescue Department, for receiving the Western Virginia Emergency Services (WVEMS) Award for Physician with Outstanding Contribution to EMS (Richard E. Burch, Jr., Chief of Fire and Rescue) In attendance for this recognition were Chief Richard E. Burch, Chief Steve Simon, Dr. Beltran and Rob Logan, Executive Director of the Western Virginia EMS Council. All Supervisors offered their congratulations and thanks. IN RE: BRIEFINGS 1. Vietnam War Commemorative Partner Program (B. Clayton Goodman III, County Administrator) Mr. Goodman gave a brief overview of the program. Chairman Altizer gave an overview of the Flag Day celebration that was held on June 14, 2013. Chairman Altizer offered the plaque and flag that was presented during the celebration to Mr. Goodman and requested he display somewhere on the first floor so that all citizens will be able to see. IN RE: PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance approving the lease and purchase of the Regional Pound Facility from the Roanoke Valley Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Inc. (Due to time constraints, it is requested that, upon a four - fifths vote of the Board, the second reading be waived and the ordinance adopted as an emergency measure.) (B. Clayton Goodman III, County Administrator) Mr. Goodman explained this was a continuation from December and gave a brief timeline on the transition to the ownership of the four local governments. He indicated that the Town of Vinton and the City of Roanoke have approved the lease and purchase and Botetourt County is in the process of bringing forward to their Board. June 25, 2013 243 Mr. Mahoney requested discretionary authority for himself and Mr. Goodman as he stated they are still working on the language of the lease. Chairman Altizer opened and closed the public hearing with no citizen to speak on this issue. Supervisors Church and Elswick both commented they are in full support of this item. ORDINANCE 062513 -3 APPROVING THE LEASE AND PURCHASE OF THE REGIONAL POUND FACILITY FROM THE ROANOKE VALLEY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS, INC. WHEREAS, on January 7, 2013, Roanoke City, Roanoke County, Town of Vinton, and Botetourt County entered into the Roanoke Valley Regional Pound Agreement providing for the operational control of a single animal control shelter effective on July 1, 2013; and WHEREAS, by this agreement the participating localities also agreed to enter into a ground lease with an option to purchase the Regional Pound property located at 1340 Baldwin Avenue, NE, Roanoke City from the Roanoke Valley Society for the prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Inc. (SPCA); and WHEREAS, the participating localities and the SPCA have negotiated a lease /purchase agreement for the temporary lease of this property until the closing on the real estate transaction can occur; and WHEREAS, this ordinance authorizes the lease and purchase of the Regional Pound facility from the SPCA pursuant to the January 7, 2013, agreement and the lease /purchase agreement dated June 26, 2013; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition and conveyance of real estate interests be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 25, 2013, and the second reading of this ordinance has been dispensed with since an emergency exists, upon a 4 /5ths vote of the members of the Board. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Lease /Purchase Agreement dated June 26, 2013, is hereby approved; and 2. That the lease of the Regional Pound facility located at 1340 Baldwin Avenue, NE, Roanoke, VA (Tax Map #3210434) from July 1, 2013 until the date of closing on the purchase of the facility by the localities, is hereby approved; and 3. That the purchase of the Regional Pound facility located at 1340 Baldwin Avenue, NE, Roanoke, VA (Tax Map #3210434), is hereby approved; and 4. That the County Administrator or Assistant County Administrator are hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of 244 June 25, 2013 Roanoke County in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of this real estate, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Church to adopt the ordinance and carried by the following roll call and recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Flora, Church, Elswick, Altizer NAYS: None IN RE: PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. The petition of Larry and Rhonda Conner to obtain a Special Use Permit in a R -1, Low Density Resident, District for an accessory apartment on approximately 4.68 acres, located at 6185/6183 Bent Mountain Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District (Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning) Mr. Thompson explained the petition and advised the Planning Commission approved June 4, 2013, five to zero with two conditions. Chairman Altizer opened and closed the public hearing with no citizens to speak on this item. There was no discussion. ORDINANCE 062513 -4 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR AN ACCESSORY APARTMENT ON APPROXIMATELY 4.68 ACRES LOCATED AT 6185/6183 BENT MOUNTAIN ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 96.01 -3 -36) WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, UPON THE PETITION OF LARRY AND RHONDA CONNER WHEREAS, Larry and Rhonda Conner have filed a petition for a special use permit for an accessory apartment on approximately 4.68 acres located at 6185/6183 Bent Mountain Road (Tax Map No. 96.01 -3 -36) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 4, 2013; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on May 28, 2013; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on June 25, 2013. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Larry and Rhonda Conner for an accessory apartment on approximately 4.68 acres located at 6185/6183 Bent Mountain Road in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District is substantially June 25, 2013 245 in accord with the adopted 2005 Community Plan, as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2 -2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and that it shall have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood or community, and said special use permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: a) The applicant shall provide an elevation certificate to the County's Department of Community Development prior to occupancy of the accessory apartment. b) All building and zoning permit approvals shall be received prior to occupancy of the accessory apartment. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The provisions of this special use permit are not severable. Invalidation of any word, phrase, clause, sentence or paragraph shall invalidate the remainder. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Elswick to adopt the ordinance and carried by the following roll call and recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Flora, Church, Elswick, Altizer NAYS: None 1. The petition of Fellowship Community Church to obtain a Special Use Permit in a R -1, Low Density Residential, District for the construction of an overflow parking lot on approximately 0.412 acre, located at 1230 Red Lane Extension, Eagle View Estates, Catawba Magisterial District (Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning) Mr. Thompson outlined the petition and advised the Planning Commission had approved five to zero on June 4, 2013 with three conditions. Mary Ellen Goodlatte, attorney, gave an overview of the project on behalf of the petitioner. Chairman Altizer opened the public hearing and the following citizen spoke concerning this agenda item: Jim Powell of 1234 Red Lane Extension stated his property adjoins the parking lot. The only opposition he has is what kind of shrubbery is going to be planted there. He advised he is strongly against any tall trees that would come up because it would block their view of the mountain, God's gift to us. He has the best view of all and provided the Board with pictures of his property. A picture is worth a thousand words. He stated he has no objections to small box bushes, hedge rows put there that are not more than three or four feet tall. If you plant big trees up there, when they start growing, 246 June 25, 2013 they will not be able to see the mountain. He stated he does not know of anything else he can add. Chairman Altizer then closed the public hearing. Supervisor Church inquired of Ms. Goodlatte about the buffers, can they help. Ms. Goodlatte stated Roanoke County staff has been very forthcoming in offering to be of assistance to both the church and Mr. Powell as the landscaping is placed on that strip. This is a required type "C" buffer. The County ordinance requires that this be installed, but there are options that are available to the property owner. Mr. Murphy and Mr. Thompson have expressed a willingness to be thoughtful as far as how we can place the landscaping so as not to obstruct Mr. Powell; they are very sensitive to that. Supervisor Church then inquired if the church and Ms. Goodlatte are in agreement with the other three conditions with Ms. Goodlatte responding they are in full agreement. She further indicated they are required by Roanoke County ordinance to landscape the property; the church must follow the rules as laid out by the County with respect to that ordinance. They have no ability not to landscape it. They will be thoughtful and careful with respect to how that landscaping is placed with input from staff. Supervisor Elswick stated he is not a hundred percent familiar with what kind of buffering the County requires. He asked Mr. Thompson if the County requires tall trees or short trees. Mr. Thompson stated staff has some flexibility. There are options. Depending on what type of buffering you are going with there are typically different options. He advised they would probably look at shorter, deciduous trees, not evergreen trees. They would probably look at utilizing evergreen shrubs instead of trees, something low growing. After the Planning Commission meeting, he spoke with John Murphy and they can be arranged in groupings so you do not have to block the entire view. He reiterated staff will work with Mr. Powell and the church. They will develop a site plan and staff will try to meet with Mr. Powell to make sure he sees it before anything is planted. Supervisor Elswick inquired is the purpose of the buffer to shield the parking lot from the neighbor with Mr. Thompson responding affirmatively. Supervisor Elswick stated so the neighbor should probably be allowed to approve the buffering. Mr. Thompson advised staff would take his input as part of the consideration. There was no further discussion. ORDINANCE 062513 -5 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY TO CONSTRUCT AN OVERFLOW PARKING LOT ON A 0.412 ACRE LOCATED AT 1230 RED LANE EXTENSION (TAX MAP NO. 45.02 -2 -11) CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, UPON THE PETITION OF FELLOWSHIP COMMUNITY CHURCH WHEREAS, Fellowship Community Church has filed a petition for a special use permit for religious assembly to construct an overflow parking lot to be located at 1230 Red Lane Extension (Tax Map No. 45.02 -2 -11) in the Catawba Magisterial District; and June 25, 2013 247 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 4, 2013; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on May 28, 2013; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on June 25, 2013. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Fellowship Community Church for religious assembly to construct an overflow parking lot on 0.412 acre located at 1230 Red Lane Extension in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 2005 Community Plan, as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2 -2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and that it shall have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood or community, and said special use permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: a) The site shall be developed in general conformance with the concept plan dated March 28, 2013, and prepared by Hughes & Associates. b) The parking or storage of church vans or busses shall be prohibited. c) No light poles or lighting fixtures shall be installed within the parking lot. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The provisions of this special use permit are not severable. Invalidation of any word, phrase, clause, sentence or paragraph shall invalidate the remainder. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Church to adopt the ordinance and carried by the following roll call and recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Flora, Church, Elswick, Altizer NAYS: None 3. The petition of Carol Lachowicz to obtain a Special Use Permit in a AV, Agricultural/Village Center, District for the operation of a automobile repair services, minor on approximately 4.476 acres, located at 8364 Bent Mountain Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District (Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning) Mr. Thompson explained the petition; minor auto repair services and advised the Planning Commission approved on June 4, 2013, four to one with four conditions. 248 June 25, 2013 Supervisor Elswick stated one of the conditions on the ordinance is the hours of operation, which is 8 to 7, Monday through Saturday. Staff recommended 8 to 5, Monday through Friday. Mr. Thompson advised the original operation they are going to start with is 8 to 5. Staff put the condition 8 to 7, Monday to Saturday to allow expansion of hours; otherwise, they would have to come back with a new special use permit. Supervisor Elswick explained this is a good thing for the neighborhood, but right across the road is a nice subdivision and he does not want to detract from the looks of the area. There is a limitation that any vehicle there over twenty -four hours shall be screened from view. The type of screening has not been defined. Mr. Thompson stated the Planning Commission talked about three different things: a fence, a board on board fence, landscaping and moving the vehicles behind the barn. At the end the Planning Commission decided they would leave that up to the applicant in the site plan process, which they thought was the best screen method and left the options up to them versus dictating whether it is a fence, landscaping or pulled behind the building. It just has to be screened from Bent Mountain Road. During the public hearing, discussion was held due to the fact of the location of the subdivision, no matter what fence you put there, people will still be able to see it; the topography is so great. Mr. Thompson advised really the screening from view is the best option as the elevation will make it almost impossible to screen from that neighborhood as it is on top of a mountain. Supervisor Elswick commented behind the building is the best option. He further added one of the conditions VDOT has is that a maintenance agreement be completed prior to that being determined as a commercial entrance; has this been done. Mr. Thompson responded he believes that it has not been done yet, but will defer to the applicant. Supervisor Elswick stated he would like to make sure this does not become another junkyard; he does not think it will as Ms. Lachowicz will make sure of that, and he will because he drives by there every day. Officially, he would like to put a limitation on the number of vehicles that can be parked outside, other than the vehicles of the tenant and the people that work there. In addition to that he would like to make a condition that there are to be no more than four vehicles parked outside awaiting repair. Chairman Altizer opened and closed the public hearing. There were no citizens to speak on this agenda item. Chairman Altizer inquired how many bays are located there with Mr. Thompson responding two (2). He then inquired how many employees with Mr. Thompson stating initially just one (1); the owner of the business. Chairman Altizer stated two bays will not hide a lot of cars. Under the ordinance, the Board is currently considering now, if there are two (2) cars in the bays, would they be held against the petitioner with Mr. Thompson responding no. He stated when driving up the mountain, there is a small glimpse. It is pretty well wooded, but there is a period when driving up that you do see the site. Ms. Lachowicz keeps the property very neat and clean and as the owner she is going to make sure it stays that way. Supervisor Church stated he did not want to penalize the petitioner for doing a good job with cars just showing up. Supervisor Elswick stated he was thinking June 25, 2013 249 for overnight purposes only. During the day, there could be ten or twelve for minor automobile repair. Vice Chairman Moore asked Mr. Thompson to specify minor repairs. Mr. Thompson stated major is engine work, minor is "jiffy lube ". ORDINANCE 062513 -6 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR THE OPERATION OF AUTOMOBILE REPAIR SERVICES, MINOR, ON APPROXIMATELY 4.476 ACRES LOCATED AT 8364 BENT MOUNTAIN ROAD (PART OF TAX MAP NO. 94.00- 01-58) WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, UPON THE PETITION OF CAROL LACHOWICZ OF L &H COMPANY WHEREAS, Carol Lachowicz of L &H Company has filed a petition for a special use permit for the operation of automobile repair services, minor, to be located at 8364 Bent Mountain Road (Part of Tax Map No. 94.00- 01 -58) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 4, 2013; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on May 28, 2013; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on June 25, 2013. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Carol Lachowicz of L &H Company for the operation of automobile repair services, minor, on 4.473 acres located at 8364 Bent Mountain Road in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 2005 Community Plan, as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2 -2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and that it shall have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood or community and said special use permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: a) The freestanding sign shall not exceed ten (10) square feet in size and six (6) feet in overall height. b) Hours of operation shall be from 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Saturday. c) Any vehicle on site for more than twenty -four (24) hours shall be screened from view from Bent Mountain Road. d) The use shall be limited to the structure located at 8364 Bent Mountain Road and the large graveled area outside of the building as shown on the concept plan. e) No more than four (4) motor vehicles shall be stored outside overnight on the property. 250 June 25, 2013 2. That said real estate is more fully described on Exhibit A, which is a two - page exhibit containing a metes and bounds description and map of the real estate prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C. dated March 27, 2013. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The provisions of this special use permit are not severable. Invalidation of any word, phrase, clause, sentence or paragraph shall invalidate the remainder. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Elswick to adopt the ordinance and carried by the following roll call and recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Flora, Church, Elswick, Altizer NAYS: None 4. The petition of Pelewoo Properties LLC to obtain a Special Use Permit in a C -2C, General Commercial, District with conditions for the operation of an automobile dealership, used on approximately 1.57 acres, located at 6802 Peters Creek Road and 7323 Deer Branch Road, Hollins Magisterial District (Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning) Mr. Thompson outlined the petition and advised the Planning Commission approved four to zero on June 4, 2013. Chairman Altizer opened and closed the public hearing with no citizens to speak on this item. There was no discussion. ORDINANCE 062513 -7 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR THE PURPOSE OF OPERATING A USED AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP ON 1.57 ACRES LOCATED AT 6802 PETERS CREEK ROAD AND 7323 DEER BRANCH ROAD (TAX MAP NOS. 27.10 -5 -12 AND 13) HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, UPON THE PETITION OF PELEWOO PROPERTIES LLC WHEREAS, Pelewoo Properties LLC has filed a petition for a special use permit for the purpose of operating a used automobile dealership to be located at 6802 Peters Creek Road and 7323 Deer Branch Road (Tax Map Nos. 27.10 -5 -12 and 13) in the Hollins Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 4, 2013; and June 25, 2013 251 WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on May 28, 2013; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on June 25, 2013. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Pelewoo Properties LLC for the purpose of operating a used automobile dealership to be located at 6802 Peters Creek Road and 7323 Deer Branch Road (Tax Map Nos. 27.10 -5 -12 and 13) in the Hollins Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 2005 Community Plan, as amended, pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2 -2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and that it shall have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood or community, and said special use permit is hereby approved. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The provisions of this special use permit are not severable. Invalidation of any word, phrase, clause, sentence or paragraph shall invalidate the remainder. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Flora to adopt the ordinance and carried by the following roll call and recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Flora, Church, Elswick, Altizer NAYS: None 5. The petition of Charles S. Wells to rezone approximately 1.0 acre from C -2C, General Commercial, District with conditions to I -2C, High Intensity Industrial, District with conditions, located at 3327 Shawnee Drive in the Glenvar area, Catawba Magisterial District (Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning) Mr. Thompson outlined the petition and advised the Planning Commission had approved on June 4, 2013 with three proffers. Mary Ellen Goodlatte, attorney for the petitioner gave an overview of the request. Supervisor Church inquired if Mr. Wells was okay with the proffers to which he responded in the affirmative. Chairman Altizer opened and closed the public hearing with no citizens to speak on this item. There was no discussion. ORDINANCE 062513 -8 REZONING APPROXIMATELY ONE (1) ACRE FROM C -2C, GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, WITH 252 June 25, 2013 CONDITIONS, TO I -2C, HIGH INTENSITY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT WITH CONDITIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF OPERATING A CONSTRUCTION YARD AT 3327 SHAWNEE DRIVE, CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (TAX MAP NO. 55.02 -2- 13.1), UPON THE APPLICATION OF CHARLES S. WELLS WHEREAS, this property was rezoned in 2008 from 1 -2 to C -2C for a gasoline station with proffered conditions; this ordinance rezones the property from C -2C to I -2C for a construction yard with proffered conditions. The proffered conditions are almost identical to the ones proffered in 2008 with the only change being in the first proffer the words "gasoline station" are changed to "construction yard "; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 28, 2013, and the second reading and public hearing were held June 25, 2013; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 4, 2013; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately one (1) acre, as described herein, and located at 3327 Shawnee Drive, Salem, VA (Tax Map Number 55.02 -2 -13.1) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C -2C, General Commercial District with conditions to I -2C, High Intensity Industrial District with conditions for the purpose of operating a construction yard. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Charles S. Wells. 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following condition which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (a) The subject property will be utilized solely as a construction yard. (b) Any freestanding sign on the property shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height with a minimum setback of fifteen (15) feet. (c) The maximum height of any structure shall not exceed forty -five (45) feet in height. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Being one (1) acre of real estate located at 3327 Shawnee Drive and further described as Tax Map No. 55.02 -02 -13.1 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed June 25, 2013 253 to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Church to adopt the ordinance and carried by the following roll call and recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Flora, Church, Elswick, Altizer NAYS: None Chairman Altizer recessed the meeting at 8:26 p.m. for five minutes. Chairman Altizer reopened the meeting at 8:36 p.m. 6. Ordinances: 1) Ordinance of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia approving the lease financing of various capital projects for the County and authorizing the leasing of certain County -owned property, the execution and delivery of a Prime Lease and a Local Lease Acquisition Agreement and Financing Lease, and other related actions 2) Ordinance providing for the refunding of 2004 lease financing with Virginia Resources Authority 3) Ordinance authorizing an amendment to the fiscal year 2013- 2014 budget by the appropriation of $13,973,416 to finance various public facility projects (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) Mr. Mahoney explained the need for one board report. He then advised the only change would be the percentage in Section 4 from four percent (4 %) to four point seven five percent (4.75 %) in the ordinance that refers to lease financing. Chairman Altizer opened the public hearing. The following citizens spoke: Mr. Mike Stovall of the Roanoke County School Board stated he is here tonight to humbly and proudly say that as the Board knows, he represents the Vinton Magisterial District on the school board and he is here tonight to say thank you. "Thank you for your vision, thank you for your planning and thank you for laying the groundwork to bring the library to the Town of Vinton." He stated he is third generation in his family that has lived in the town; his children are the fourth. He is a businessman now in the town; was in the County, no offense, but he moved his business to the town. He had a lunch meeting the other day and has had lots of meetings and been to lots of Chamber events and lots of everybody talking about the library. He told the Board tonight that it is a vote of resurrection in his opinion. While driving over to the meeting, he came through the Town of Vinton; he drives through it a lot and what the library can do for the town, the difference it can make in his opinion is astronomical. He is in the process of talking 254 June 25, 2013 to a family about buying a piece of adjacent property from the library if it is voted in. So, quite frankly, once again he is here to say thank you. Thank you for your vision. Thank you for the fact of bringing it there. He never realized the entries to that library. He realized that some are repeat entries; but over 200,000 entries to that library every year makes a difference. People thought the Post Office would do it; the Post Office has not done it. In his opinion what can do it and what will do it is the library. As you know, Roland E. Cook sets a couple of blocks or a block and one half above it. He has had conversations with individuals that have looked at Roland E. Cook for the purpose of moving into Roland E. Cook and then having the opportunity to use the library. In closing, he would like to say thank you for allowing him the opportunity to speak, thank you five Board members for your vision, thank Mr. Goodman and his administration for the work as a lot of citizens of Vinton are looking forward to the building of the library. Al Bedrosian of 8346 Cardington Drive in Roanoke, Virginia stated he has to say he disagrees with Mr. Stovall because he does not think the libraries built years ago brought economic development to an area. He thinks it is a free enterprise system; lower taxes and lower debt. He is not here to specially talk about the Vinton Library because he likes libraries. He is here to talk about the disturbing pattern he is seeing in our government. He stated he looked back and Roanoke County was incorporated in 1838. Up to 1994, we accumulated $60 million worth of debt. From 1994 to now, we have about $200 million of debt, so we tripled the size of debt. It took us 160 years to get to the $60 million number and twenty years to triple that number and now we are looking to adding more. He was thinking the number was $10 million and now he is hearing the number is really $14 million because of other things that are being added. It concerns him. It also concerns him the pattern that we are setting that none of these things ever come to a vote in November, a vote of the people. We always do some kind of lease revenue sharing and never comes to the people to vote on it. He used to think those kind of capital projects did come to the people. The other concern is the debt ratio that we have to operating revenue. In 2008, we were about five and one half percent (5 % %). In 2009, it went to seven point four percent (7.4 %) and in 2010 it went to seven point seven three percent (7.73 %). In 2011 it was eight point five eight percent (8.58 %). The numbers just keep increasing. We always complain about the federal government spending so much money and he looks right here in the County and it is exorbitant and with full disclosure, he is running for Roanoke County Supervisor and he will tell you the one thing he has heard more often when he was on the campaign trail is the two things that we did. Chairman Altizer informed Mr. Bedrosian that he could not campaign from the podium. Mr. Bedrosian apologized and stated the only reason that he is talking about it is because he kept hearing it; the Green Ridge Center and the Southwest County Library, which is why he is bringing it up here. It was $50 million worth of debt that we did and the people are concerned. The last thing that he considers objectionable is that we are putting such a big project in place when two of the Board June 25, 2013 255 members are stepping down and a new Board will convene in January. He stated he finds that just not the right thing to do when you have such a big project of $14 million that we should wait till the new Board, whatever the new Board is and if they think it is the right thing to do, then they would do it, but not when two Board members are stepping down. Mayor Brad Grose of the Town of Vinton thanked the Board for their service to the citizens of Roanoke County. He appreciates very much what they are doing and also wants to congratulate the Board on the professional staff they have assembled; he is very proud of his staff in the Town of Vinton and certainly appreciates when things are done in a professional and efficient manner. He added he also appreciates very much the daily cooperation that goes on between Roanoke County and Vinton staff. In his opinion, Roanoke County has a very great, good reputation for making wise use of taxpayer money and at the same time providing a lot of great services for our citizens. As part of the Board's leadership, the Board has helped establish a great quality of life. In that leadership, if Mr. Church will allow him to use his words, they have consistently supported the Roanoke County library system. You have recognized that libraries, great libraries are an important part of our citizen's life and thank you for that. You know by now all the facts and figures that are connected with the Vinton library and certainly hope you understand the need to replace that structure so he will not go into those details, but would like to emphasize tonight the importance of moving ahead on this project as soon as possible. As we stand here tonight, they have an opportunity to save taxpayer money, to bring a vital service to East County and Vinton up to the Roanoke County standard as it is in the best of the County and have an opportunity to support economic development in downtown Vinton. He advised the economic development aspect is very important, however, it is a win -win situation for Roanoke County as well as Vinton. He stated they know that in the Town of Vinton it will create a lot of synergy; as a matter of fact just the discussions the Board has held have already created much excitement about the future of Vinton and its downtown. He added he hopes the Board will seriously consider moving ahead with this as soon as possible because the construction of the library on the current schedule they have been talking about the past few weeks would actually work in conjunction with the Town of Vinton's downtown revitalization plan. So those two programs working together will make a huge, positive impact upon the economic climate in downtown Vinton. He respectfully urged the Board to vote yes for the funding of the library. Chairman Altizer closed the public hearing as there were no additional speakers. Chairman Altizer stated just so there is no confusion from one of the earlier speakers who mentioned indebtedness as far as the bond is concerned being increased to $14 million. The increase did not increase the amount of bond indebtedness; it is $8.2 million, not $14 million. He stated he would like to point out in doing $14 million in projects; we have $6 million in cash we are paying, which is putting down forty -two percent (42 %) He stated he wished when he bought his first house he 256 June 25, 2013 could have put down forty -two percent (42 %); it goes deeper than that. This Board seven or eight years ago developed a funding formula, which was the prudent thing to do in order to renovate and build schools and to renovate and build needed things at Roanoke County and that has worked well. Roanoke County just came out of probably the worst recession that everybody else just came through. Yet, we continue to do things, we continue to renovate schools, build schools, and needed projects in Roanoke County. A library of today is not a library as it was in 1950 and 1960. He stated he has toured a lot of libraries and on July 1, 2013, we will be cutting the ribbon on the Glenvar library. That library is nothing like the library that was torn down. This library will be nothing like the library that it replaces. A library is a place of meeting, a place of learning; it is a place for folks who do not have the advantage of computers. Programming for children now probably is a hundred times better than programming for children when I "growed" up. He stated he used to go to a library and found a seat and hope somebody would tell him where a book he was looking for was and he sat there and he read. There are so many more things to a library that has a detailed impression on the children of today. The library is not just a library, it is an economic driver. He does not care any way that you look at it; it is going to be an economic driver. The Vinton library, the third highest used library in Roanoke County with circulation in 2011/2012 of 204,479 people passing through there. Now, he has seen parents drop off their kids at the library and mom and dad go to other places; because they cannot find a parking space number one and if they are lucky to find a parking space they cannot find a computer terminal to go inside and go anything with. This is not indicative of the Vinton library; it was the same way at Glenvar and the same with the South County library. When you take 204,000 and he believes it will increase to 250,000 because now parents will go into the library with their kids; they will do things because there will be things for the parents to do. He stated he is pretty decent with numbers but out of 250,000 people on the streets of downtown Vinton, he cannot help but think a certain percentage of them are going to stop in some stores and spend some money. We are going to create an environment for people to understand that Vinton, maybe they need to be there or maybe need to expand or they don't need to roll their steps up at 5:00 p.m. because we know nobody else is coming downtown. That is part of the things a library for Vinton does for you; there is a return on that investment. We all certainly wish that we could pay cash for everything we do. We as individuals for the most part, has never been able to buy a house and pay cash for it. It is a fundamental way that we have to do things and quite frankly at very lucrative interest rates at this time. If we are going to build this, now is the time to do it. Sure, there is a flux, unstableness in the bond market, but still if we finance it today the interest rates would be three point seven percent (3.7 %), cheap money. If we were on a course that we thought everything that we had to do we would pay cash, we would be waiting a long time. For all the things we have built in Roanoke County, if we would have to wait to pay cash, it comes out to about 122 years to accomplish what we have in the last seven or eight. Still having done all that, Roanoke County has stayed well within our debt June 25, 2013 257 policies, we are in good shape, we have an appropriated balance at ten point nine eight percent (10.98 %) of eleven percent (11 %) commitment. During the hardest part of the recession, Roanoke County had their bond ratings raised twice. The first one to say you are spending too much money is the bonding agencies because they are going to start cutting your bond rate when you do that. We live in an economy and we govern now by different paradigms than the way people governed in the 1990's of 1980's. You used to not be able to get Roanoke County or anybody in this valley, i.e. Roanoke City, to incorporate if somebody could get somebody else to carry a trash can across the street to help another locality to put it in their truck, but now we do things together, we are saving, we are doing things that save us all money. If you look at return on investment, he believed the return on investment is going to be way far greater than three to four percent (3 -4 %) borrowing money. In the Town of Vinton, and knows of a Board member that sits on this Board that represents a town and also taxpayers of Roanoke County and also the folks he represents in that district and he is going to tell you from the crowds that have come out from the first two library meetings; they think it is important. They think their tax dollars are important to spend. The business community thinks it is important to spend downtown. He certainly thinks it is important to spend and after further discussion will make a motion on this item. Supervisor Moore stated she would like to add there are areas too in Roanoke County where people do not have internet service right now and our libraries provide these people an opportunity to come in and use the computers. There are school children who have homework that they have to do on their laptop, but they have no internet service. Also, libraries are an economic development driver; South County library has a great coffee shop. People go in there just to get coffee and have a snack and they have an opportunity to relax, to socialize and talk about meetings. There are lots of meetings that go on at the library, and they talk about other opportunities. She stated she thinks it is a great sign where we have low interest rate bonds that we could take advantage of. The longer we wait construction costs will go up as the economy grows. So, she too puts her approval on the Vinton library; thinks it will be a great economic driver for Roanoke County, Vinton and regional people too. Supervisor Church stated everybody on this Board knows how much he believes in libraries, he has been in support of every library. We have had several in this area, South County, Glenvar and now Vinton. He stated he knows what it is like to have a community that literally yearns for this type of facility. In the 1950's or 1960's in Glenvar, those of you who have entered the door; you had to bump your door into the back of a chair in our computer lab, which were two or three chairs. A person would be bumped by a patron coming in just to get in the door. Children that went to Glenvar have no security, one step and they are out of the eye of any counselors. These are the kind of conditions that no library nor County building should want to have. He has supported and has been consistent in his support as Mayor Grose (by the way thanks to Mayor Grose and other officials for coming, they are welcome all the time) can attest to. Supervisor Church stated it took him longer than he wished for Glenvar; five or six years 258 June 25, 2013 longer, but okay we are going to open it up July 1, 2013. He can tell and the people who see this meeting tonight and the people that attended the community meetings; had the largest attendance for a community based meeting when they planned the Glenvar library than they have had for anything, except maybe those who opposed an asphalt plant may have been larger. These people came and they came with great ideas because they saw the benefit of a centerpiece for the community. Route 11/460 has been twenty (20) years in the making to widen it to four (4) lanes. It is going to be what we like to refer to as another Route 419, a real community, a divided medium with grass and bike lanes and pedestrian lane. These are things that communities do care about. They care about having the aging population to have meeting rooms that they can go to without traveling across town. A community is what it says, community. The Glenvar library opening is coming up July 1 St and he is going to hold Mayor Grose to it, if he is not there he will call him out to be in attendance because we need to work to help buildings like this and learning centers like this to give the opportunity to children to learn how to operate outside of just reading a book. They can go there to learn and to have fun and learn at the same time. A lot has been talked about the debt; he would be the first to admit that Roanoke County is not even a drop in a rain storm in comparison to the federal government. Our debt is important, but it pales if you look at the billions and trillions that the federal government has. We are doing something here that he believes will be sustaining; it is not frivolously throwing money away to a project that a lot of people can come along and say if you did not do this you could have done that. Being a senior member on this Board, he has heard so many times that our tax rate is out of kilter, "we have the largest tax rate in the State of Virginia" and if they stop and compare apples to apples; that is simply not true. We have $1.09 per one hundred. We fund full -time fire and rescue, full -time police department and curbside trash and bulk collection. If you take that $40 million a year out of the budget, the cost would be seventy cents and compares favorably to Botetourt, Montgomery, Bedford, etc. They do not have these amenities. Our citizens do want these amenities; they have told us over and over again. No one that he knows of wants to pick up bags of trash and put in their pickup truck or SUV and haul it down to a dumping site on Route 460 or Route 220 or wherever. With the amenities and with the cost of government, it does amount to something in return. He stated he goes back to the needs and the desires for the community; these are taxpayers. The people in Glenvar and surely the people in the Town of Vinton and East County are going to be paying taxes; it is not like they are getting a free gift. By the way, Roanoke County paid cash for Glenvar. This is going to be a legacy, a long -time reward; annuity that never stops paying in his opinion. Supervisor Elswick stated in the continuous stories about libraries, it is interesting that the County and Board at the time almost $20 million was being discussed for South County Library, refused to spend $70,000 for a children's activities room on the Bent Mountain Library. The people on the mountain had to raise one half the money to add a real small room for the kids on the mountain. So, he would like for the County to get its priorities set and then adhere to what we said we were going to do. June 25, 2013 259 If we delayed one library for seven or eight years and refused to spend money on another one, that is not fair and it is not the way that taxpayers ought to be treated. In his humble opinion, in talking about cash versus borrowing, there is $20 million in fund that is only there so that we can get a good rating for the bonds that we issue when we borrow money. If we don't borrow, there is $20 million. If we had not borrowed, there is $15 to $17 million that we spend every year making the mortgage and interest payments on what we did borrow; that is almost $40 million and even more if you count the money we have left over in the reserve accounts. The School Board had $12 million left over in the health reserve account and we had $7 million left over at the end of last year. There is lots of taxpayer money that is being held in reserve by the County, yet the taxpayers themselves have seen their taxes doubled. Starting when housing prices were going up. In talking about the rate, he does not worry about the rate. It is the assessments on people's houses that determine what the bills are going to be and when they doubled, we went out and borrowed over $220 million while at the same time our revenues from property taxes where doubling. Don't blame it on the County maybe because the federal government does it, the State did. These bonds that we are thinking about issuing, it is the State that is giving us the mechanism to avoid taxpayer approval for us spending money. You can also do it with lease revenue bonds, but all of our methods for borrowing recently have been methods that are specifically designed to avoid taxpayer approval. He is one of the strongest proponents of libraries; he very much supports what Brad and the people of Vinton are doing in terms of running the town, but this project has been accelerated. It came up after the budget; we are having to change the budget to get this project through for the Vinton library and Social Services and the other projects. Social Services and those other projects could have been paid for without borrowing money. So we accelerate one and delay another one; that is not right. So, he stated this project will be approved, there is no doubt about that, but he hopes this is the last time that we borrow any money using these lease payments and from now on if we borrow money, we make a five -year plan and say these are the projects that we are going to complete in those five (5) years, this is what they cost, this is why we are doing it and submit it to the taxpayers for voter approval for general obligation bonds. He stated he thinks we ought to be spending the money we have, the same way the citizens do, citizens when they need a mortgage on their house, they do not have the money under the bed to pay for the mortgage; they have to borrow the money to buy their house. He stated he thinks we ought to try to move towards no more borrowing. ORDINANCE 062513 -9 OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA APPROVING THE LEASE FINANCING OF VARIOUS CAPITAL PROJECTS FOR THE COUNTY AND AUTHORIZING THE LEASING OF CERTAIN COUNTY -OWNED PROPERTY, THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF A PRIME LEASE AND A LOCAL LEASE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT AND FINANCING LEASE, AND OTHER RELATED ACTIONS 260 June 25, 2013 WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors (the "Board ") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County "), intends to finance all or a portion of the costs (or to reimburse the County for payment of such costs) of various capital improvements, including the construction of a new public library in the Town of Vinton, Virginia (the "Project "); WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is in the best interest of the County to enter into a lease arrangement in order to obtain funds to finance the Project; WHEREAS, the Board is authorized, pursuant to Section 15.2 -1800 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, to lease any improved or unimproved real estate held by the County; WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 11, 2013 and the second reading and public hearing was held on June 25, 2013; WHEREAS, Virginia Resources Authority ( "VRA ") intends to issue its Infrastructure and State Moral Obligation Revenue Bonds (Virginia Pooled Financing Program), Series 2013B (the "VRA Bonds "), and to provide a portion of the proceeds to the County to finance the Project pursuant to the terms of a Local Lease Acquisition Agreement and Financing Lease (the "Financing Lease "), between the County and VRA; WHEREAS, the County will enter into a Prime Lease (the "Prime Lease ") with VRA whereby the County will lease certain real estate, which may include any or all of the parcel or parcels of real estate on which the Project is located or on which the County's public safety building is located, as may be required by VRA (the "Real Estate ") and the associated improvements and property located thereon (the "Improvements ") to VRA; WHEREAS, the County will enter into the Financing Lease with VRA pursuant to which VRA will lease the Real Estate and the Improvements back to the County and the County will make rental payments corresponding in amount and timing to the debt service on the portion of the VRA Bonds issued to finance the Project (the "Rental Payments "); WHEREAS, pursuant to the Financing Lease the County will undertake and complete the Project; WHEREAS, the County intends to pay the Rental Payments out of appropriations from the County's General Fund; WHEREAS, the Financing Lease shall indicate that approximately $8,218,350 (or such other amount as requested by the County and approved by VRA prior to the pricing of the VRA Bonds) is the amount of proceeds requested (the "Proceeds Requested ") from VRA; WHEREAS, VRA's objective is to pay the County an amount which, in VRA's judgment, reflects the market value of the Rental Payments under the Financing Lease (the "VRA Purchase Price Objective "), taking consideration of such factors as the purchase price to be received by VRA for the VRA Bonds, the issuance costs of the VRA Bonds (consisting of the underwriters' discount and other costs incurred by VRA (collectively, the "VRA Costs ")) and other market conditions relating to the sale of the June 25, 2013 261 VRA Bonds; WHEREAS, such factors may result in the County receiving an amount other than the par amount of the aggregate principal components of the Rental Payments under the Financing Lease and consequently (i) the aggregate principal components of the Rental Payments under the Financing Lease may be greater than the Proceeds Requested in order to receive an amount of proceeds that is substantially equal to the Proceeds Requested, or (ii) if the maximum authorized aggregate principal components of the Rental Payments under the Financing Lease set forth in paragraph 4 of this Ordinance does not exceed the Proceeds Requested by at least the amount of the VRA Costs and any original issue discount, the amount to be paid to the County, given the VRA Purchase Price Objective and market conditions, will be less than the Proceeds Requested; WHEREAS, the Prime Lease and the Financing Lease are referred to herein as the "Documents." Copies of the Documents are on file with the County Administrator. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA: 1. Approval of Lease - Leaseback Arrangement The lease- leaseback arrangement with VRA to accomplish the financing of the Project is hereby approved. The County Administrator is authorized to determine the Real Estate and Improvements, as may be required by VRA, to be subject to the lease- leaseback arrangement. 2. Approval of Prime Lease The leasing of the Real Estate and the Improvements by the County, as lessor, to VRA, as lessee, pursuant to the terms of the Prime Lease is hereby approved. 3. Approval of the Financing Lease The leasing of the Real Estate and the Improvements by VRA, as lessor, to the County, as lessee, pursuant to the terms of the Financing Lease is hereby approved. 4. Approval of the Terms of the Rental Payments The Rental Payments set forth in the Financing Lease shall be composed of principal and interest components reflecting an original aggregate principal amount not to exceed $8,795,000, a true interest cost not to exceed 4.75% per annum (taking into account any original issue discount or premium) and a term not exceeding twenty (20) years from the date of the closing of the VRA Bonds. It is determined to be in the best interest of the County to accept the offer of VRA to enter into the Financing Lease with the County for an amount determined by VRA to be fair, subject to the conditions set forth in this Ordinance, which Financing Lease shall be executed by the Chairman of the Board (the "Chairman ") and the County Administrator, or either of them. Given the VRA Purchase Price Objective and market conditions, it may become necessary to enter into the Financing Lease with aggregate principal components of the Rental Payments greater than the Proceeds Requested. If the limitation on the maximum aggregate principal components of Rental Payments on the Financing Lease set forth in this paragraph 4 restricts VRA's ability to generate the 262 June 25, 2013 Proceeds Requested, taking into account the VRA Costs, the VRA Purchase Price Objective and market conditions, the County Administrator is authorized to accept a purchase price for the Bond at an amount less than the Proceeds Requested. The Financing Lease, in substantially the form presented to this meeting, is hereby approved, with such completions, omissions, insertions and changes not inconsistent with this Ordinance as may be approved by the Chairman or the County Administrator. The Chairman and the County Administrator, either of whom may act are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the Financing Lease. The actions of the Chairman and the County Administrator in accepting the final terms of the Rental Payments shall be conclusive, and no further action shall be necessary on the part of the Board. 5. Other Payments under Financing Lease The County agrees to pay all amounts required by the Financing Lease, including any amounts required by Section 5.1(b) of the Financing Lease, including the "Supplemental Interest," as provided in such section. 6. Execution and Recordation of Documents The Chairman and the County Administrator, either of whom may act, are authorized and directed to execute the Documents and deliver them to the other parties thereto. The Chairman and the County Administrator, either of whom may act, are further authorized to cause the Prime Lease and the Financing Lease, to be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County. 7. Form of Documents The Documents shall be in substantially the forms on file with the County Administrator, which are hereby approved with such completions, omissions, insertions and changes as may be approved by the Chairman and the County Administrator, either of whom may act, with the execution and delivery of the Documents by the Chairman and /or the County Administrator constituting conclusive evidence of the approval of any such completions, omissions, insertions, and changes. 8. Essentiality of the Project and Real Estate The Project, the Real Estate and the Improvements are hereby declared to be essential to the efficient operation of the County, and the County anticipates that the Project, the Real Estate and the Improvements will continue to be essential to the operation of the County during the term of the Financing Lease. 9. Annual Budget While recognizing that it is not empowered to make any binding commitment to make Rental Payments and any other payments required under the Financing Lease beyond the current fiscal year, the Board hereby states its intent to make annual appropriations for future fiscal years in amounts sufficient to make all such payments and hereby recommends that future Boards do likewise during the term of the Financing Lease. The Board directs the County Administrator, or such other officer who may be charged with the responsibility for preparing the County's annual budget, to include in the budget request for each fiscal year during the term of the Financing Lease an amount sufficient to pay the Rental Payments and all other payments coming due under the Financing Lease during such fiscal year. If at any time during any fiscal year June 25, 2013 263 of the County throughout the term of the Financing Lease, the amount appropriated in the County's annual budget in any such fiscal year is insufficient to pay when due the Rental Payments and any other payments required under the Financing Lease, the Board directs the County Administrator, or such other officer who may be charged with the responsibility for preparing the County's annual budget, to submit to the Board at the next scheduled meeting, or as promptly as practicable but in any event within 45 days, a request for a supplemental appropriation sufficient to cover the deficit. 10. Rental Payments Subject to Appropriation The County's obligation to make the Rental Payments and all other payments pursuant to the Financing Lease is hereby specifically stated to be subject to annual appropriation therefor by the Board, and nothing in this Ordinance or the Documents shall constitute a pledge of the full faith and credit nor taxing power of the County or compel the Board to make any such appropriation. 11. Disclosure Documents The County authorizes and consents to the inclusion of information with respect to the County to be contained in VRA's Preliminary Official Statement and VRA's Official Statement in final form, both to be prepared in connection with the sale of the VRA Bonds. If appropriate, such disclosure documents shall be distributed in such manner and at such times as VRA shall determine. The County Administrator is authorized and directed to take whatever actions are necessary and /or appropriate to aid VRA in ensuring compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2 -12. 12. Tax Documents The County Administrator and the Director of Finance, either of whom may act, is authorized to execute a Nonarbitrage Certificate and Tax Compliance Agreement and /or any related document (the "Tax Documents ") setting forth the expected use and investment of the proceeds of the VRA Bonds to be received pursuant to the Documents and containing such covenants as may be necessary in order for the County and /or VRA to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Tax Code "), with respect to the VRA Bonds and the Documents including the provisions of Section 148 of the Tax Code and applicable regulations relating to "arbitrage bonds." The County covenants that the proceeds of the VRA Bonds to be received pursuant to the Documents will be invested and expended as set forth in the Tax Documents, to be delivered simultaneously with the issuance and delivery of the Financing Lease and that the County shall comply with the other covenants and representations contained therein. 13. Other Actions All other actions of the officers of the County in conformity with the purpose and intent of this Ordinance are hereby approved and confirmed. The officers of the County are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver all certificates and instruments and to take all such further action as may be considered necessary or desirable in connection with the execution and delivery of the Documents. 14. SNAP Investment Authorization The County has heretofore received and reviewed the Information Statement (the "Information Statement ") describing the 264 June 25, 2013 State Non - Arbitrage Program of the Commonwealth of Virginia ( "SNAP ") and the Contract Creating the State Non - Arbitrage Program Pool I (the "Contract "), and the County has determined to authorize the Director of Finance to utilize SNAP in connection with the investment of the proceeds of the lease- leaseback transaction if the Director of Finance determines that the utilization of SNAP is in the best interest of the County. The Board acknowledges that the Treasury Board of the Commonwealth of Virginia is not, and shall not be, in any way liable to the County in connection with SNAP, except as otherwise provided in the contract creating the investment program pool. 15. Effective Date This Ordinance shall take effect immediately. On motion of Supervisor Altizer to adopt the ordinance and carried by the following roll call and recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Flora, Church, Altizer NAYS: Supervisor Elswick ORDINANCE 062513 -10 PROVIDING FOR THE REFUNDING OF 2004 LEASE FINANCING WITH VIRGINIA RESOURCES AUTHORITY WHEREAS, on June 1, 2004, the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Local Government ") entered into a Financing Lease (the "Original Financing Lease "), with Virginia Resources Authority ( "VRA "), and VRA acquired the Original Financing Lease pursuant to a Local Lease Acquisition Agreement dated as of June 16, 2004, between VRA and the Local Government; WHEREAS, VRA acquired the Original Financing Lease with a portion of the proceeds of one of the series of VRA's Virginia Pooled Financing Program Bonds (the "VRA VPFP Bonds "); WHEREAS, VRA has advised the Local Government that the credit markets are currently favorable for the refunding of a portion of the VRA VPFP Bonds (the "Refunding Transaction "), which may enable VRA to pass on annual debt service savings to the Local Government; WHEREAS, VRA will effect the Refunding Transaction through the issuance and sale of a series of refunding bonds issued under VRA's Virginia Pooled Financing Program (the "VRA Refunding Bonds "); WHEREAS, VRA has indicated that if the Local Government participates in the Refunding Transaction the most significant modifications required to the terms of the Original Financing Lease will be to reconcile the Rental Payments and redemption provisions of the Original Financing Lease with the debt service payments and redemption provisions of the VRA Refunding Bonds and such modifications will be embodied in amendments to the Original Financing Lease or in replacements thereof (the "Local Refunding Documents "); and June 25, 2013 265 WHEREAS, unless otherwise defined each capitalized term used in this Ordinance shall have the meaning given it in the Original Financing Lease; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 11, 2013, and the second reading and public hearing was held on June 25, 2013. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT: Article I. Agreement to Participate. The Local Government's participation in the Refunding Transaction is hereby approved provided that (i) the minimum savings threshold to be realized by the Local Government shall be not less than three percent (3 %) savings on a present value basis compared to the existing and outstanding Rental Payments under the Original Financing Lease or portion thereof to be refunded and (ii) the term of the Original Financing Lease as amended or replaced in the Refunding Transaction shall not be extended past the end of the fiscal year in which occurs the current final Rental Payment under the Original Financing Lease. Article II. Authorization of Local Refunding Documents. Each of the Local Government's Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, County Administrator and Director of Finance (each a "Local Representative ") is authorized to execute and deliver the Local Refunding Documents in such form as will reflect and facilitate the Refunding Transaction within the parameters and intent of this Ordinance. The Clerk to the Board of Supervisors is authorized to affix the Local Government's seal on any such documents and attest or counter -sign the same. Article III. Official Statement. The Local Government authorizes and consents to the inclusion of information with respect to the Local Government in VRA's Preliminary Official Statement and Official Statement, both to be prepared in connection with the sale of the VRA Refunding Bonds. Article IV. Other Actions. Each Local Representative is authorized to execute and deliver all certificates, documents, agreements and instruments and to take all such further action as they may consider necessary and desirable in connection with the refunding of all or a portion of the Original Financing Lease and the consummation of the Refunding Transaction, including the execution and delivery of such documents and the making of such elections as may be reasonably requested by VRA to maintain or establish a tax - favored status for the VRA Refunding Bonds. Article V. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately. On motion of Supervisor Moore to adopt the ordinance and carried by the following roll call and recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Flora, Church, Elswick, Altizer NAYS: None ORDINANCE 062513 -11 AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2013 -2014 BUDGET BY THE APPROPRIATION OF $13,973,416 TO FINANCE VARIOUS PUBLIC FACILITY PROJECTS 266 June 25, 2013 WHEREAS, on May 14, 2013, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County held a work session on the County's Capital Improvements Program Tier 1 Priority Projects; and WHEREAS, the Board considered County staff recommendations for funding capital projects by appropriating or re- appropriating funds from various other sources; and WHEREAS, Section 15.2 -2507 of the Code of Virginia provides that a locality may amend its budget to adjust the aggregate amount appropriated; however, any such amendment which exceeds one percent of the total expenditures in the adopted budget must be accomplished by publishing a notice of a meeting and a public hearing in the newspaper and that such notice shall state the governing bodies intent to amend the budget and include a brief synopsis of the proposed budget amendment; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Charter provides that funds be appropriated by ordinance; and WHEREAS, first reading of this ordinance was held on June 11, 2013, and the second reading and public hearing was held on June 25, 2013. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Roanoke County 2013 -2014 Budget and Appropriation Ordinance be amended by the appropriation of $13,973,416 from the sources and for the purposes as follows: Amount Amount of source Project Appropriated Source of Funds of funds Fuel Storage Tanks Fire and Rescue Generators P & R Sports Field Lighting Social Services Library 250,000 From Merriman Roundabout From South Countv Library 928,000 From Merriman Roundabout 750,000 From South County Libra From Minor Capital 3,000,000 From Salem City From Salem Bank and Trust Fund From Major Capital From Minor Capital 8,682,100 2013 Bond Issue -VRA Town of Vinton Lease proceeds Integrated Financial System 363,316 2004VRA Refunding 200,000 50,000 928,000 522,000 228,000 500,000 1,000,000 938,161 561,839 8,218,350 377,500 86,250 363.316 $ 13,973,416 June 25, 2013 267 2. That this ordinance shall take effect from and after July 1, 2013. On motion of Supervisor Flora to adopt the ordinance and carried by the following roll call and recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Flora, Church, Altizer NAYS: Supervisor Elswick 7. Ordinance authorizing the vacation of (1) a portion of an unimproved fifty foot (50') right -of -way designated as Circleview Drive, (2) a twenty foot (20') access easement to Stormwater Management Area, and (3) a Stormwater Management easement (plat of Suncrest Heights, Section 3, Plat Book 13, Page 165) and accepting the dedication of 0.117 acre for the completion of a cul- de -sac at the end of Circleview Drive and a public drainage easement as shown on a plat entitled "Resubdivision Plat from records for John A. Hall & Company, Inc. and Kent S. Greenawalt Revocable Trust ", located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) Mr. Covey outlined the ordinance and advised there was no change from the first reading. Vice Chairman Moore thanked Mr. Covey and his staff for the work on this agenda item. Chairman Altizer opened and closed the public hearing. There were no citizens to speak on this item. Vice Chairman Moore commented this will reduce the amount of impervious paving; water runoff and is great for the community. Supervisor Elswick thanked Mr. Covey for all the work that went into this project; it has been a tough project. Additionally, he thanked Mr. Greenwalt for all that he has done to get this accomplished. ORDINANCE 062513 -12 AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF (1) A PORTION OF AN UNIMPROVED FIFTY FOOT (50') RIGHT - OF -WAY DESIGNATED AS CIRCLEVIEW DRIVE, (2) A TWENTY FOOT (20') ACCESS EASEMENT TO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA, AND (3) A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT EASEMENT (PLAT OF SUNCREST HEIGHTS, SECTION 3, PLAT BOOK 13, PAGE 165) AND ACCEPTING THE DEDICATION OF 0.117 AC. FOR THE COMPLETION OF A CUL- DE -SAC AT THE END OF CIRCLEVIEW DRIVE AND A PUBLIC DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SHOWN ON A PLAT ENTITLED "RESUBDIVISION PLAT FROM RECORDS FOR JOHN A. HALL 268 June 25, 2013 & COMPANY, INC. AND KENT S. GREENAWALT REVOCABLE TRUST ", LOCATED IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the map of Sunset Heights, Section 3, (Exhibit "A ") recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 13, page 165, dedicated a fifty foot (50') right -of -way designated as Circleview Drive, a twenty foot (20') access easement to a stormwater management easement, and a 0.3285 acre stormwater management easement; and WHEREAS, a portion of the area dedicated and set aside for public use as Circleview Drive on Plat Book 13, Page 165 has never been improved and is no longer needed to meet the County subdivision ordinance regulations; and WHEREAS, a 0.3285 stormwater management easement is no longer necessary due to the reduction in the amount of impervious area in Sunset Heights, Section 3 also eliminating the need for the twenty foot (20') access easement to the stormwater management easement; and WHEREAS, John A. Hall & Company, Inc., the developer of Sunset Heights, Section 3, and Kent Greenawalt, an adjoining property owner who has purchased six (6) lots of the original thirteen (13) lots in Section 3 of Sunset Heights, have requested, pursuant to Section 15.2 -2272 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate of a portion of Circleview Drive, a twenty foot (20') access easement to a stormwater easement and a 0.3285 acre stormwater management easement so as to permit these property owners to make improvements to their properties; and WHEREAS, no other property owner will be affected by the vacation of this undeveloped portion of said Circleview Drive, twenty foot (20') access easement to stormwater management easement, and stormwater management easement and their current existence imposes an impediment to the adjoining property owners making improvements to their properties; and WHEREAS, this vacation will not involve any cost to the County and the affected County departments have raised no objection; and WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.2 -2204 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended); and THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on June 11, 2013, and a second reading and public hearing of this ordinance was held on June 25, 2013. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Roanoke County Charter, the subject real estate (a portion of Circleview Drive, a fifty foot (50') wide street containing approximately five hundred twenty five (525) linear feet and 1.103 June 25, 2013 269 acres and (shown as Area #1 on the attached Exhibit "B ") is hereby declared to be surplus and the nature of the interests in real estate renders it unavailable for other public use, pursuant to Section 15.2 -2272 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. 4. That the twenty foot (20') access easement to stormwater management easement and the stormwater management easement shown as Areas #2 and #3 as described and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto, be and hereby are, vacated pursuant to Section 15.2 -2272 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. 5. That Roanoke County hereby accepts the dedication to the public by John A. Hall & Company, Inc. and Kent S. Greenawalt Revocable Trust of a 0.3285 acre public drainage easement (Area # 3 on Exhibit "B ") and a 0.117 acre parcel for the completion of the cul -de -sac at the end of Circleview Drive (Area #4 on Exhibit "B ") to be dedicated by the recordation of a plat entitled "Resubdivision Plat from records for John A. Hall & Company, Inc. and Kent S. Greenawalt Revocable Trust showing the vacation of 1.103 Acres of Circleview Drive, Section 3, Suncrest Heights (PB13, PG 165) Being Vacated by the County of Roanoke and the Dedication of a 0.117 Acre Cul- de- Sac..." dated May 20, 2013, prepared by Parker Design Group; and 6. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the responsibility of the Petitioners. 7. That the County Administrator, or any Assistant County Administrator, is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish the provisions of this ordinance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 8. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption, and a certified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with Section 15.2 -2272 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). On motion of Supervisor Moore to adopt the ordinance and carried by the following roll call and recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Flora, Church, Elswick, Altizer NAYS: None IN RE: APPOINTMENTS 1. Community Policy and Management Team (CPMT) (at Large appointment) It was the consensus of the Board to recommend the reappointment of Ms. Lisa McDowell of Braley and Thompson as the Private Community Resource to an additional three -year term to expire June 30, 2016. Confirmation was placed on the Consent Agenda. 270 June 25, 2013 Supervisor Church requested the Clerk contact Janice Tawney to see if she would be willing to serve an additional term on the Social Services Advisory Board. IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA RESOLUTION 062513 -13 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J- CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for June 25, 2013, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 2 inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of minutes — June 11, 2013 2. Confirmation of appointment to the Court Community Corrections Program Regional Community Criminal Justice Board; Community Policy and Management Team (CPMT) On motion of Supervisor Altizer to adopt the resolution and carried by the following roll call and recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Flora, Church, Elswick, Altizer NAYS: None A- 062513 -13.a IN RE: REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Request for public hearing to establish blight and determine disposition of property located at 3414 Garst Mill Road (Joel Baker, Building Inspector) A- 062513 -14 Mr. Baker outlined the request to hold a public hearing on the 3414 Garst Mill Road location. There was no discussion. On motion of Supervisor Elswick to approve the staff recommendation to hold a public hearing on August 13, 2013 and carried by the following roll call and recorded vote: June 25, 2013 271 AYES: Supervisors Moore, Flora, Church, Elswick, Altizer NAYS: None IN RE: CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS The following citizens spoke: Mr. Noah Tickle of 1603 Frosty Lane in Salem, Virginia stated Galileo had to recant or face death for agreeing with Copernicus and arguing against environmental issues, which was settled science in 1633. Just 34 years ago, settled science was manifest in Newsweek with the declaration that the world was entering into its latest ice age, and we had better do something now or else we would all starve. Robert Frost's immortal lines from 1920 come to mind, "Some say the world will end in fire; some say in ice. "..... Apparently, still others can't make up their minds and do chicken little Co2 scary stories, like Maxine Waters. With the fundamental scientific ground so shaky in support of manmade global warming, why does the theory continue to garner exaggerated deceptive support? In general, the "wanners" movement can be grouped neatly into several deceptive blocs. Mostly liberal politicians want access to unlimited tax revenues; for scientists and pseudo- scientists, global warming victory is a path to prestige and grants; for large corporations, it's a billion - dollar market (pioneered by Enron) for trading in carbon credits; for the hard left, it's a new path to dictatorial power, their tax and spend industrial complex to control every aspect of humanity; for venture capitalists like Kleiner Perkins and green startups at the public trough, it's a path to alternative- energy- funding bonanzas; for the radical greens, it's equivalent to the unquestioned adherence to a religious faith with analogs to Mother Goddess Gaia, priests and priestess of Al Gore flying around in their private jets, indulging in carbon offsets, guilt (western affluence) and Governance Groups trying to get in the money pot, but none of these things can justify or excuse upending our entire financial system or tossing our economic vibrancy, Liberty, and very sovereignty into the "cesspool" of European models of socialist global government. We came here long ago to get away from that and that much SHOULD BE settled fact. The one worlder globalists are here as a cancer tentacle into our local governance in the UN Socialist form Agenda 21 Trojan Horse as The International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives "A.K.A" ICLEI. Very simply, defund ICLEI and it will be gone. Defunding always works. Roxanne Christley of 7259 Willow Valley Road in Roanoke, Virginia stated the First Amendment of the Constitution expresses the right and duty of all citizens to express their opinions about the role of government on issues concerning all of us. She stated she will plan and continue to do her part in expressing hers. Recently, she was criticized for defending the property rights resolution proposed to this Board on May 14, 2013, with respect to a letter to the editor that she submitted to the Roanoke Times. She advised she is not here to defend her opinion, but rather to draw attention to it. 272 June 25, 2013 She might state a recent quote from Congressman Bob Goodlatte regarding the property rights protection act, HR19 -44 being considered by the Federal government. Private ownership of property is vital to our freedom and our prosperity and is one of the most fundamental principals embedded in the Constitution. What she found most appalling when the Roanoke County property rights resolution was introduced last month was the immediate criticism made by three members of this Board. There was nothing constructive in that criticism and it was more than obvious that the resolution was going to be voted down by what has become an ever present and distinct voting block on this Board. The right of property is not a partisan issue; it is a matter of liberty for all citizens of this community, of this Commonwealth and of this country. That liberty is not yours to grant or denigrate as a local governing body, rather it is your job and your duty to protect and affirm that liberty at every opportunity and under every circumstance. She asked that this Board provide an affirmative private property rights resolution in July of this year. Forget about your personal and private agendas for a change. Each of you work for us, the citizens of Roanoke County and you just need to do the right thing. IN RE: REPORTS Supervisor Flora moved to receive and file the following reports. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Altizer, Church, Elswick, Flora NAYS: None 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Reserves 3. Reserve for Board Contingency 4. Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Revenues as of May 31, 2013 5. Comparative Statement of Budgeted and Actual Expenditures and Encumbrances as of May 31, 2013 6. Accounts Paid — May 31, 2013 IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Church advised that Lori Gray, avid supporter of Roanoke County who sat over behind the first row, wife of Jim Gray, a sweet person who had a good heart that cared about where she lived and the people that represented Roanoke County has passed away. He advised he thinks the world of her and Jim Gray, her husband. He thinks anyone who has met them has nothing but fond feelings for them. He commented he has to look at it that she just took a trip a few days ago on the way to June 25, 2013 273 heaven and that is an absolute in his mind and heart. Our prayers and support for Jim gray and his family; they are good people. Also, recently our Board acknowledged the known about pending death of our local hero, Luke Hancock's father. Luke Hancock was here with us as we honored him; he is a strong individual, his family is also strong. This is another loss that touches Roanoke County and part of its citizenry and just want to pass on our prayers and condolences to his brother and sisters and Mr. Hancock's wife and the rest of the Hancock family. Supervisor Elswick stated he echoes what Mr. Church had to say about Lori Gray. He was at the funeral and one of the saddest times of his life because he was so close to Lori and Jim and he will be there for Jim whatever he needs. He also welcomed people to look at the website for the Bent Mountain Community Center; there are a lot of activities there. The people attending classes are from all over Roanoke County and even some from Roanoke City. There was a class on Saturday for people who wanted to apply for concealed carry permit and a lot of the people were actually from Roanoke City. He met them as they shot their guns on his property as a part of the qualification process. So, please go to the website and see if there are any classes you may be interested in because that Center is there for everybody. Supervisor Altizer stated on Flag Day, recognizing the Vietnam Veterans at the Vinton War Memorial, was a moving experience and he is certainly glad that Roanoke County is a part of a coalition of local governments that is going to recognize our Vietnam veterans through the next four years. He stated that is going to be a good thing. IN RE: ADJOURNMENT Chairman Altizer adjourned the meeting at 9:38 p.m. Approved by: Michael W. Altizer Chairman Clerk to the Board 274 June 25, 2013 PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK