HomeMy WebLinkAbout5/18/2022 - Minutes .'`Pk County of Roanoke
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
c
PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES
MAY 18, 2022
BZA Members Present:
Mr. Richard Jones, Chairman
Mr. Eric Thomas, Vice-Chairman
Mr. Robert Arthur
Ms. Charlotte Moore
BZA Members Absent:
Mr. Carlton Wright
Staff Present:
Ms. Rebecca James, Secretary
Mr. William Richardson, Alternate Secretary
Ms. Rachel Lower, Senior Assistant County Attorney
Ms. Cecelia Thomas, Recording Secretary
CALL TO ORDER
Mr. Jones called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mr. Jones noted that they would be making amendments to the agenda based on the
recommendations of staff. He noted they would be reversing the order of the public
hearings with the petition of Ricky and Angela Dalton going first with the petition of
Clayton Ferris going second. He noted there would be an addition to the agenda to
approve the BZA schedule for 2022. He noted approval of the schedule would be
followed by an Election of Officers, for the remainder of 2022. Mr. Thomas made a
motion to pass the agenda with suggested amendments which passed 4-0.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Ms. Moore made a motion to pass the September 16, 2020 minutes, which passed 4-0.
PUBLIC HEARING
1. The petition of Ricky and Angela Dalton for a variance of Section 30-41-3(B)of the
Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to allow an accessory structure to be located in
front of the front building line on a corner lot, located at 542 Castleridge Road, Vinton,
VA 24179. The property is zoned R-1 Low Density Residential District and is located in
the Vinton Magisterial District. Mr. William Richardson presented the history of the case.
He noted that the Daltons had installed a permitted pool, which hindered their ability to
move the accessory structure. Thus, they require a variance for the accessory structure
to remain on their property. Mr. Jones questioned what the appropriate setback for the
property would be. It was noted that 30 feet is the required setback for the property. Mr.
Ricky Dalton and Ms.Angela Dalton spoke about getting the building on his property.
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MINUTES MAY 18,2022
He noted that he believed he had gone through the proper process to have the
accessory building added to the property. He noted he was not aware that he was in
error regarding zoning. He noted that he had measured his property, and noted them is
nowhere else to place the structure where it is in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance.
Ms. Moore questioned if the applicant had considered locating the accessory structure
on a different part of the property. Mr. Dalton noted that it would not fit where Ms. Moore
suggested due to the pumps for the pool.
Mr. Jones opened the public hearing, and with no citizens wanting to speak, closed the
public hearing.
Mr. Arthur made a motion to grant the variance which passed 3-1. Ms. Moore
commented that due to the zoning of the area it is not permitted and the zoning
ordinance should be abided by.
AYES: Arthur, Jones, Thomas
NAPES: Moore
ASTAINS: None
2. The petition of Clayton W. Ferris for an administrative appeal of the Zoning
Administrator's written determination of Zoning Ordinance Section 30-88-2(A)11 -
Accessory Uses: Residential Uses, involving the permanent keeping of a temporary
portable storage container without obtaining an approved zoning permit and removing
the said container within the applicable time limit, located at 1937 Middle Valley Drive
Roanoke, VA 24012. The property is zoned R-1, Low Density, Residential District and is
located in the Hollins Magisterial District. Ms. James presented the history of the site
and the enforcement action that was taken. She reviewed what the Zoning Ordinance
states about a temporary portable storage container. Mr. Jones questioned if there was
ever an application submitted for a temporary use application for a storage unit on the
property. Ms. Lower questioned had an application been applied for to place a storage
unit, using a temporary use permit to place the unit on the property. Ms. James noted
that the permit would have been denied to place it on the property permanently. Mr.
Ferris spoke to the Board noting that it does not state anywhere in the code that you
need a permit for a permanent structure on the property. He noted he put the structure
up during the beginning of the pandemic due to needing storage. He insisted that the
County offices were closed per Google. However, he was informed by staff that the
offices were indeed open the entire time. He noted he did not come to the building, but
the website said the office was closed. He said due to this, he relied on his definition of
the code and proceeded with the storage unit. He noted he painted it green and took it
out of public view. He continued saying he chose the container due to his neighbor's
trees. He noted that his neighbors cleaned up part of their property 16 days before the
public hearing. He also noted rocks that were left in their yard. He noted it is not
temporary and was intended to be permanent. The applicant stated that it was a good
idea at the time and that the structure works fine.
Mr. Jones opened the public hearing.
Page 2 of 4
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MINUTES MAY 18, 2022
James Bussey, 1940 Pinewood Drive, noted that the street is behind Mr. Ferris'
property. He continued that the container is placed on the backside of Mr. Ferris'
property and that, as his neighbors, it is in their sightline as they leave their house. He
noted that if it had been placed somewhere else on Mr. Ferris' property they would not
have said a word. He said their main problem is that they see it from their house. He
stated if Mr. Ferris had placed it on the other side of the piles of brush and trees they
never would have known about it. He noted that it seemed intentional to put the storage
unit on the other side of a brush pile, so the applicant could not see the storage unit but
the neighbors could. He noted there are many other places to put the storage unit on
the property. He stated that if there are any rocks on the property he is happy to help
take care of it, and that they would like to get along with the neighbors.
Mr. Ferris stated that the neighbor's main complaint was where he placed the unit. He
noted that he was trying to use the storage unit as a privacy fence. He noted that Mr.
Bussey has a building on the property line. Mr. Ferris noted that he is offended by the
"pile of junk" Mr. Bussey has on his property. Mr. Ferris said that he would be happy if
Mr. Bussey moved the things that he was offended by. Mr. Bussey responded that he
would do it.
Mr. Jones closed the public hearing.
Mr. Arthur questioned if you have a structure on your property, do you have to have a
permit. Ms. Lower noted you have to have a permit if it is allowable by the Zoning
Ordinance. Ms. Lower noted that it is not allowable in the Zoning Ordinance due to the
Board of Supervisors not approving storage containers to be permitted permanent use.
She agreed that he was not going to find it listed in the Zoning Ordinance saying that it
is allowed because it is not. Mr. Jones noted that may be something that the Planning
Commissioners may want to address.
Ms. Moore made a motion to uphold the zoning administrator's written determination,
which passed 4-0.
AYES: Moore, Arthur, Thomas, Jones
NAPES: None
ASTAINS: None
Ms. Lower noted that for both public hearings, the decision of the Board of Zoning
Appeals is appealable by an aggrieved party for up to 30 days.
APPROVAL OF SCHEDULE
Ms. Moore made a motion to approve the 2022 schedule for the Board of Zoning
Appeals which passed 4-0.
ELECTION OF OFFICERS
Page 3 of 4
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MINUTES MAY 18, 2022
Mr. Thomas made a motion that Mr. Jones continues as Chairman, which passed 4-0.
Mr. Jones made a motion that Mr. Thomas continues as Vice-Chairman which passed
4-0.
Mr. Jones made a motion to approve staff members as is, which passed 4-0.
COMMENTS OF BOARD AND STAFF
There were none.
ADJOURNMENT
With no further discussion, the meeting adjoumed at 7:32 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,��
Celia Thomas `ort 2
C cella Thomas, riling Secretary
Roanoke County Board of Zoning Appeals
be re. IAA • C"44-4-S
ecca James, Secretary
oanoke County Board of ning Appeals
Page 4 of 4