Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7/3/2012 - MinutesCommissioners, Present: Ms. Martha Hooker Mr. Gary Jarrell Mr. Gene Marrano Mr. Jason Peters Mr, David Radford Staff Present: Mir. Philip Thompson, Secretary Mr. Paul Mahoney, COUnty Attorney li Ruth Ellen Kluhnel,, Assistant County Attorney Mr. John Murphy Ms, Susan Carter, Recording Secretary EVENING.;jESSION Mr. Radford called the Public Hearing to order at, 7:00 p.,m, Mr. Jarrell gave the invocation and fled the pled f Wlegiance, Approval of Amenda Mr. Peters, made a motion to approve the agenda as amended', which passed 5-0. Approva,l of Minutes Ms. Hooker rnade a motion to approve the minutes of June 5, 2012„ 'which passed 5 Mr Peters made a mation to approve the minutes from June 119, 2012, which passed 4- 0-1, with Ms. Hooker abstaining. Consent 89en Mr, Thompson provided a brief overview of the history of the A. B, Hammond petition. He stated the petitioner wants the property for agricultural land use, Mr. Thompson provided a brief history and overview of the petition, of Christ the King Presbyterian Church. He stated the church wants to change the proffered condifionis an the property. The consensus of the commissioners was two visit the site prior to the public hearing on August 7, 2012, Mr. Thompson dies cussed amending both thiiH County Code regulations and Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance definitions regarding chicken keeping. Mr. Peters, made a motion toapprove the consent agenda, which passed 5-0. NBM� ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES J ULY 3, 2012 . I Comments of Planning Commissioners and Planning Sta Mr., Thompson remind the Comirniss[oners, that the July 17, 20112, Planning Commission Wo on has been canceled. Public Hearing I , The petition of South Peak Residences LL C, et al to rezone 11.41 t acres from R-3, Me&um Density Multi-Family Residential District, and C- 2C, General Commercial District, with conditions, to R- 4C, High Density MUlti-Farnfly Residential District, with conditions, identified as Area "A" on the Concept Development Plain for 176 multi-family residential units", and to rezone 11.940 acres frorn R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District, to R,- Medium Density Multi-Famlly Residential District, with condition ' s, identified as Area B" on the Concept Development Plan with a proffered density limit of 2 single family residential units, involving several properties (07'7.20-01-48-01-000 and 077.20-01-50.00-0000; and portions of 077.20-01-52.00-0000 and 087,08- 01 - 11.00 - 0000) located at 4240 Elm View Road, 4,252 Elm View Road, and 4486 Summit Street, Cave Spring Magisterial District. Mr. Murphy presented' the staff report,, including a review of the proposed proffered conditions and a brief history of the petition. He reviewed the proposed concept pion, including density, access, and stoirmwater concerns which were expressed by citizens at the ccimirnUrrity meeting. He discussed buffering plans, noting the petitioner plans to minimally disturb the surrounding wooded area. He also stated the proposed pedestdan access to Area A is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Ms. Hooker noted sidewalks end trails are riot defined on the concept plan, Mr, Murphy stated although sidewalks were not initially included in the concept plan for Area A, the plan was later modified to include there, He stated that Area B will include sidewalks or walking trails along one side of the streets, Mr. Marrano inquired about the location of 'the trails,, Mr. Murphy discussed this issue, noting the importance of connectivity of the development areas. He discussed the area which is not included as part of the current petition, Mr, Jarrell inquired about the higher density request. Mr, Murphy discussed this issue, in , 0111.4ing the by-right density and height restriction of the proposed building. Ms. Maryel'Ien Gooclatte, Esquire, stated the petition applies to the resident , ially zoned area only,, She discussed the acreage of the valriOLIS, parcels included in the petition, noting some of the parcels adjoin commercial properties. She stated the petitioner believes South Peak should be less dense and similar in style to the Hunting Hills area, She reviewed the proposed concept plan, noting the reducboni of density , from Area B to Area A, is needed by South Peak in order to enhance the area. She discussed the amenities such as undergrOUnd parking and an observation area, . She stated better placement of the condominiums ZMEM ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 3, 2012 would create no impact to the previous traffic impact analysis. She stated the facades of the buildings will be built in the arts and crafts design style. She stated Area B is mostly wooded and they plan to disturb as few trees as possible. Ms. Goodlatte then discussed drainage issues, noting the proposed development should improve existing Quail Ridge stormwater runoff issues. She introduced Mr. Tom Austin, Civil Engineer, who concurred with Ms. Goodlatte. She stated the petitioner will develop the roadway network to enhance connectivity. She introduced Mr. Gene Whitesell and Mr. Will Holmes who are also working on the project. Mr. Gene Marrano inquired about height restrictions of the structures. Ms. Goodlatte explained this issue, noting the final range will be approximately 1362 feet at the same grade with the finished floor grade. She reiterated the proposed proffered conditions of this petition do not apply to Area B. She reviewed the topographical issues of the site. Mr. Marrano inquired about the observation area. Mr. Whitesell and Mr. Holmes discussed this issue. Ms. Goodlatte stated there is a 60 foot limit on the structure height. Mr. Marrano inquired about exterior colors of the development. Ms. Goodlatte reviewed the proffers and discussed this issue. Ms. Hooker was agreeable with shifting the density and the additional buffering. She stated that she appreciates the consideration being given to pedestrian traffic. Mr. Marrano inquired about stormwater management. Ms. Goodlatte noted Quail Ridge should benefit from the proposed development regarding their current stormwater issues. Mr. Peters inquired about the finished floor height. Ms. Goodlatte discussed this issue. Mr. Jarrell inquired about installation of sprinkler systems. Mr. Holmes stated the development will have a sprinkling system. Mr. Radford inquired about the development of a homeowners' association (HOA) or property owners' association (POA). Mr. Whitesell noted that covenants for the condominiums will be developed. Ms. Goodlatte stated she is unsure if the development will be large enough for the organization of a POA at this time. Mr. Radford suggested constructing sidewalks on both sides of street. Mr. Marrano concurred. Ms. Goodlatte stated the petitioner is listening to suggestions and also trying to lessen the impact to the area. Mr. Peters and Mr. Jarrell inquired about the use of the Roanoke County Design Guideline Standards. Mr. Murphy discussed this issue, noting that these standards address sidewalks which are required to be on only one side of the private road. Mr. Radford inquired about preventing problems with the sidewalk and trails. Mr. Murphy discussed bonding requirements. Mr. Thompson stated the suggested proffers #5 and #8 refer to the standards and can be added to the petitioner's proffered conditions. Mr. Radford opened the public hearing for public comment. With no citizens requesting to speak, Mr. Radford closed the public hearing. Mr. Peters and the Commissioners agreed they are pleased to see progress on the site. Page 3 of 5 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 3, 2012 Mr. Marrano made a motion to recommend approval of the rezoning with the following proffered conditions with proffers 5 and 8 being amended as folllows: 0 n_ With respect to the property described on the attached Exhibit A (the Area A tract): Area A will be developed in substantial conformity with the Concept Development Plan made by Mattern & Craig dated June 14, 2012, subject to such changes as may be required by Roanoke County during comprehensive site plan review. 2. The height of any building in Area A shall not exceed sixty (60) feet (as measured by the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance). colors, materials and detailing as shown on the rendering prepared by Jones and Jones dated September 9, 2011, and attached hereto as Exhibit A-1 . 3. All facades and finishes of buildings in Area A shall be of similar design 4. No freestanding light pole, including fixture, shall be more than eighteen (18) feet above grade. All exterior lights, including security lighting, shall be down-lit or shielded so as not to direct glare onto adjoining streets or properties. The intensity at adjoining streets or properties shall not exceed 0.5-foot candles. All street lighting shall be designed to complement the architecture of the adjacent buildings. 5. All residential buildings in Area A shall be connected by sidewalks. Sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with Roanoke County design standards. With respect to the property described on the attached Exhibit B (the Area B tract): 6. Area B shall be developed only for single-family dwellings. 7. Area B shall be subdivided such that no more than twenty-three (23) single-family dwellings shall be constructed thereon. 8. A sidewalk or walking trail, constructed in accordance with Roanoke County standards, shall be installed along one side of the streets to be developed in Area B. 9. A row of evergreen trees shall be installed along the southern boundary of Area B which adjoins tax map parcels 87.08-06-16.00 through 87.08- 06 -28.00 inclusive, planted twenty (20') feet on center. Page 4 of 5 JULY 3, 202 Mr. Thompson cal1led the roll and the rnotion passed (5-0) with the following vote: AYES: Hooker, Jarrell, Marrano, Peters, Radford NAYES: None ABSTAIN: None Final Orders, 1. The petition Of'BlUe Ridge Bread, Inc. (Panera) to obtain a Special Use Permit iin a C-2, General Commerciaf District for the operation of a drive-in and fast food restaurant on 1.02 acres located at 4202 Electric Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District was approved by the Board of Supervisors at a Plublic Hearing on June 26, 2012. Citizen Comments ME no citizens requesting to speak, Mr. Radford closed the citizen comme�nt period, Cornmissioners'acrd Staff Comments Mr. Marrano discussed adding bike lanes and walkways to assist with Citizen transportation, He Suggested burying powers lines in conjunction with bike lane construction to defray the cost of the lanes by working with other partner agencies. The commissioners discussed the aesthetics of the addition of the South Peak project, Mr Radford thanked sWff'fbr coordinating conduct the Planning Commission Publir, Roanoke County Administration Building. Frith the South Courity Library in order to Hearing during the power outage at the ffith no further business or comments, Mr. Radford adjourned the meeting at 7:53 p.m. Respectfully Subrnitte& Susan McCoy Recording Secretary, Roanoke County Planning Commission Philip T ii' mpson 4a� Secreta'ry, Roanoke County Planning Commission David Ra fo rd Chairman, Roa ke County Planning Commission 93MEM