Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2/19/2013 - MinutesMs., Martha Hooker Mr. Gary Jarrefl[ Mr, Gene Marra no Mr, Jason Peters Mr. Jim Woltz Staff Present: Mr. Philip Thompscn, Secretary Ms. Ruth Ellen Kuhn el, Assistant County Attorney Mr, David Holladay Mr. John Murphy Ms. Megan Cron1se Ms. Tammi Wood Ms, Susan McCoy, Recording Secretary Guests". Mr, Jake Gilmer, Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Commission Mr. Gary Robertson, Western Virgirilla Water Authority Mr. Bob Benni nger, 'Western Virginia WaterAuthorlity Call to Order: Mr. Peters called the meeting to order at 6.01 p.m. Approval of.Agenda Mr. Marrano made a motion[ to approve the agenda, which passed 5-0. Approval of Minutes Mr. Jarrell made a motion toapprove the rninuties of January 7,2013 and January 15, 20 13, which passed 6-0. Consent _Agenda Ms, Cronise provided a PowerPoint presentation which included a bdef history of the petition, the revised traffic study, and the revised conceptual p[an. She reviewed the surrounding zon�nq and future land use designation. She noted the concept plan has noit been proffered sriue - they do not currently have a tenant for the property,, She discussed the grading plan and location of the existing structure at 5259 Crossbow Circle which is owned by Old Heritage Corporation. She reviewed the topography and sight distance of the property, Mr, Miarrano inquired about the future land use of - the property. Ms. Cronise discussed this issue. Mr. Woltz inquired about impact the I �.. M ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 19, 2013 rezoning would have on other nearby homes. Mr. Thompson and Ms. Cronise discussed this issue. Mr. Peters inquired about signage. Ms. Cronise discussed signage options. Mr. Thompson and Ms. Cronise discussed proposed retaining walls and signage height. Mr. Woltz inquired about landscaping. Ms. Cronise discussed landscaping, noting many issues would be addressed during site plan review process. Mr. Marrano inquired about visibility when coming down Crossbow Circle. Ms. Cronise discussed grading plans for the property. Mr. Marrano inquired about sight distance. Mr. Holladay and Ms. Cronise discussed this issue. Ms. Hooker inquired about buffering. Ms. Cronise discussed buffering options. Mr. Woltz inquired about Roanoke City involvement. Ms. Cronise discussed this issue. Mr. Peters expressed concern some plantings may shade the road creating icy areas. Mr. Woltz inquired about types of plantings. Ms. Cronise and the Commissioners discussed landscaping issues. Mr. Marrano inquired about stormwater management. Ms. Cronise discussed options for stormwater management. Mr. Marrano inquired about the entrance to the property and improving sight distance for Quail Valley. Ms. Cronise discussed issues regarding the ingress and egress of the property. Ms. Hooker made a motion to approve the consent agenda, which passed 5 -0. Partnership for a Livable Roanoke Valley Ms. Cronise introduced Mr. Jake Gilmer, Roanoke Valley- Alleghany Regional Commission (RVARC). Mr. Gilmer discussed the purpose of the Partnership for a Livable Roanoke Valley. He provided a PowerPoint Presentation regarding the Virginia Tech Survey Results, Goals of the Partnership, and 2013 Plan. He stated the 50 participating organizations include housing, energy and environment, transportation, land use, economic development, and education. He reviewed the partnership timeline, including public engagement, planning process, stakeholder engagement, and strategies. He reviewed the survey sample participants which consisted of a cross - section of 1030 participants from the Roanoke Metropolitan Service (MSA) area which includes Botetourt, Roanoke City, Salem, Craig County, Franklin County, and Roanoke County. He provided an overview of the survey, noting the top priorities in the MSA are economic development, clean water and air, preventative health care, and education. Mr. Gilmer discussed the broad area priorities within Roanoke County, including economic development, clean water and air, educational options and academic performance, and fire and police services. He stated respondents which identified housing areas as priority included housing for multi - generational families, housing for the elderly, affordable housing, and energy efficient housing. He stated respondents which- identified transportation as a top priority included managing traffic in the area, promoting alternative transportation options, improving sidewalks, walking paths and trails, providing transportation choices, and providing passenger rail service. He reviewed the top priorities regarding land usage issues, including preserving public access to land for recreational and sporting uses, having less restriction on land development, using large areas of land to attract industrial development, encouraging development in green areas or rural land, encouraging development in existing communities, and preservation of green areas and rural land. He stated top priorities regarding energy issues included programs to assist low income citizens with energy costs, promotion and encouragement of energy efficiency and conservation, reducing Page 2 of 6 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 19, 2013 the regulation of traditional energy sources, generation of energy using local sources, and exploration of alternative and renewable sources of energy. He stated environmental issues included preserving scenic vistas and views of the mountains, beautification of public spaces, and willingness to pay more for clean water and air. He stated economic priorities included promoting local tourism and outdoor recreation, making areas attractive as a retirement destination, increasing manufacturing jobs, providing training to citizens, preservation of existing jobs and a stable population in the area, and bringing jobs and population growth to the area. Mr. Gilmer stated priorities regarding health issues included increasing programs aimed at improving local residents' health, preventative care, availability of high quality medical care in the area, and programs assisting with health care cost. He stated educational priorities included providing college scholarship programs, improving graduation rates, improving safety in the schools, improving the performance of schools in the area, and improving pre- school options in the community. He stated the survey results indicated people like the mountains and scenery, size of the area, and the community. He stated they indicated jobs and economy, transportation, and education are the greatest challenges for the area. Mr. Gilmer reviewed the stakeholder input, stating the top driving trends facing the area include state and federal funding, health care costs, housing, and government effectiveness. He reviewed the Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats (SWOT) of the Roanoke Valley. He discussed regional readiness and social and economic conditions. He reviewed high priority vision areas, including education, economy, quality of life, community, and recreation. He reviewed workshop results, broad area survey results, and individual area survey results. Mr. Gilmer reviewed the Working Vision, Goals and 2013 Plan, including the mission and vision statements. He reviewed the working goal areas, including economic opportunity, workforce development, and health- vibrant communities. He reviewed the planning process which will include collaboration workshops and integrated strategies with academia, businesses, government agencies, and non - profit organizations. He reviewed the development of indicators and implementation framework. He stated public outreach will include key informant interviews, local government work sessions, public input meetings, and website outreach at ideas. livableroanoke.org Mr. Marrano inquired about progress since previous meeting. Mr. Gilmer discussed this issue. Mr. Woltz inquired about profiles of survey participants and presentation of questions to the participants. Mr. Gilmer discussed this issue. Mr. Woltz inquired about involvement of the airport authority and rail - services. Mr. Gilmer discussed the upcoming collaboration workshops. Mr. Jarrell inquired about schedule of upcoming meetings. Mr. Gilmer discussed the schedule and location of meetings. He stated additional information can be acquired at www.livableroanoke.org Route 221 Area Plan Amendment (Waterline) Mr. Holladay provided a brief history and overview of the waterline extension project, noting it is not in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. He introduced Mr. Gary Robertson and Mr. Bob Benninger, Western Virginia Water Authority (WVWA). Mr. Holladay stated that the water authority applied for a grant in August 2010 but was Page 3of6 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 19, 2013 denied. He reviewed a letter of support from the county for the extension. Ms. Hooker inquired reason for denial of grant. Mr. Robertson stated other communities were more stressed for water at that time. Mr. Robertson provided a PowerPoint presentation, including a brief history of the waterline request, noting the Martin Creek system is fragile. He stated the projected line would being at Cotton Hill and covered the subdivisions of Carriage Hills and Forest Edge. He stated originally 10 groundwater wells were servicing the area, however, 3 of the wells have been determined by the Virginia Department of Health (VDH) to be under the influence of surface water, requiring a filtration system if they are to remain in use. Mr. Woltz inquired about ultra - violet treatment of water. Mr. Robertson discussed the type of disinfection system mandated by the VDH. Mr. Robertson discussed the history of the shortage of water which slowed construction in this area. He stated potential connection points for the waterline include Country Homes, Holly Ridge, Falcon Ridge Estates, Highfields Farm, Old Mill Plantation, Kings Forest, and Autumn Park. Mr. Woltz inquired if wells were still allowed on private parcels. Mr. Robertson stated they would be allowed if the property is at least 1'/ acres. Mr. Woltz discussed the possibility of accessing high volumes of water on the ridge near the Martin Creek system. Mr. Robertson discussed this issue. Mr. Robertson discussed the benefits and cost of installing the waterline, including providing a reliable and adequate source of potable water, providing a potential connection of additional subdivisions, providing for the installation of fire hydrants along Route 221. He stated the project cost would be $2.8 million and would be included in the project CIP funding for FY -2013 to FY -2017. Mr. Woltz inquired if citizens would be required to connect to the system. Mr. Robertson discussed this issue. Mr. Jarrell inquired about fees. Mr. Robertson discussed this process. He discussed the area's steep slopes, proximity to Back Creek, rock outcroppings, location of existing gas line, and proposed location of waterline. Ms. Cronise inquired about service of waterline on Route 220. Mr. Robertson stated that line serves primarily serves Franklin County. Mr. Marrano suggested placing a sidewalk or path along proposed waterline. Mr. Robertson noted most of the line would be in a ditch line. He discussed requirements if waterline was to be placed beside the gas line. Mr. Woltz inquired about the depth of the waterline. Mr. Robertson discussed this issue. Mr. Thompson stated the waterline would improve water availability to existing subdivisions. Mr. Marrano inquired about Roanoke County School property at the Poage Farm property. Mr. Thompson discussed this issue. Mr. Jarrell inquired if surface water was from bad casing. Mr. Robertson stated it could be- but - generally -it is due to a geologic formation. Mr. Jarrell inquired about other failed wells. Mr. Robertson and Mr. Benninger discussed this issue. Mr. Thompson discussed the timeline for the proposed amendment. Zoning Ordinance Amendments (Permitted Uses) Mr. Thompson provided a brief review of permitted uses. He stated each Planning Commissioner will receive for review a map for their district with all parcels and zoning designations. He discussed use statistics within various zoning designations. He discussed various uses which currently are permitted by -right and others which require a special use permit such as churches. Mr. Thompson and the Commissioners Page 4 of 6 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 19, 2013 discussed this issue. Mr. Thompson noted some restrictions may need reconsideration. He stated various uses have evolved in some districts and not in others such as golf courses and marinas. He stated the Explore Park District will need to be reviewed. Mr. Holladay discussed restrictions placed on convenience stores, noting pharmacies are allowed to be open 24 hours by- right. Mr. Woltz discussed regulations regarding personal airports. Mr. Holladay discussed this issue. Mr. Thompson stated some uses which require police and fire department approval or are regulated by another government agency may not need to go through the special use permit process. He discussed design standards, noting the importance of keeping up with technological changes. Mr. Thompson stated berms need to be reviewed and clarified. Ms. Cronise stated topography should be addressed regarding berms. Mr. Thompson discussed site development regulations including lot requirements and building and lot coverage. Mr. Woltz discussed development in various zoning designations. Mr. Thompson stated some lots could require easements to access to prevent development only on frontage area. He stated certain size limits and standards could be developed. Mr. Marrano inquired about citizen input. Mr. Thompson stated staff has conversations with citizens on daily basis regarding uses, especially with the current economic situation. Mr. Peters discussed using state findings for daycare use instead of requiring a special use permit. Other Comments Mr. Thompson and Commissioners discussed laptop use and groupwise accessibility. Ms. Cronise stated that the Hunting Hills Homeowners' Association will be conducting a meeting to discuss the Old Heritage Corporation petition on Monday, February 25, 2013, at 6:30 p.m. in the Board of Supervisors Meeting Room. Mr. Woltz and Mr. Jarrell stated due to previous commitments, they will not be able to attend the March 5, 2013 Planning Commission Public Hearing. With no further business or comments, Mr. Peters adjourned the meeting at 8:41 p.m. Respectfully Submitted: r Susan McCoy Recording Secretary, Roanoke County Planning Commission 7_Z�'d ip Tho pson . reta ,Roanoke County Planning Commission Page 5 of 6 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Approved: Jason Oeters Chairman, Roanoke County Planning Commission FEBRUARY 19, 2013 Page 6of6