Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout9/20/2005 - Minutes ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION MINUTES –SEPTEMBER 20, 2005 Present: Ms. Martha Hooker Mr. Steve Azar Mr. Rodney McNeil Mr. Gary Jarrell Mr. Al Thomason Mr. Elmer Hodge, County Administrator Mr. Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Mr. Arnold Covey Mr. George Simpson Ms. Janet Scheid Mr. David Holladay Mr. Tim Beard Mr. John Murphy Ms. Kate Youngbluth Ms. Susan Carter, Recording Secretary Mr. Michael Altizer Guests: Ms. Mary Ellen Goodlatte Mr. Larry Vandermaten Mr. Dale Wilkinson Mr. Lewis Petchie Mr. Cody Lowe, The Roanoke Times Mr. Mike Lindsey, WVTF Ms. Grace Terry Mr. Bob Flynn Mr. Gene Marrano Mr. Brent Robertson, Director of Management & Budget Ms. Cathy Tomlin WORK SESSION: Session opened at 4:00p.m. by Ms.Hooker. Approval of Agenda Mr.McNeilmoved to approve the amended agenda. Motion passed 5-0. Discussion of Explore Park Rezoning Mr. Larry Vandermaten spoke regarding the prospective new development of Explore Park. He provided a brief history of the parkand said that the process he would like to go through will be an evolutionary process. He stated there are approximately 1,100 acres which may take $100,000 to develop. He explained the design practice involves a succession of new ideasand that some information regarding the development will be trade secrets and not disclosed. Ms. Mary Ellen Goodlatte, Esquire, stated this 1 development will be moving the Explore Park in a new way. She stated it will be family based. She noted she has discussed this development with staff and requested continued input from them. She stated they want to address concerns proactively. Mr. Vandermaten stated they are restricted by the VRFA’s lease. He stated they are in the process of meeting with neighbors regarding concerns. He stated it is a creative conceptual development. He introducedMr. Lewis Petchie from the Design Factory, Jacksonville, Floridaand indicatedthey are making an effort to have‘top flight’ people. Mr. McNeil asked for clarification of the request. Mr. Vandermaten stated they need to know the maximum threshold of what is allowed. He stated they will incorporate the original Master Plan into the new plan. He stated they plan to provide a family destination which will require overnight lodging. Mr. Azar agreed a new approach to the park is needed but would like more specifics. Mr. Thomason asked about the type of guests expected. Mr. Vandermaten stated the facility will rely on overnight vacationers. Mr. Jarrell asked about timeshare residences. Mr. Vandermaten stated timeshare residences would probably not be developed. He stated a residential settlement will not be created at this development. Ms. Hooker stated the proposed development brings with it a unique responsibility. She inquired about the timeframe. Mr. Holladay stated they plan to conduct aPC/BOS Joint Worksession to discuss this th development. He stated an Open House for the public is planned for October5. He th stated prior the PCPH on October4, they may visit the site. He reviewed the filing deadlines. Ms. Goodlatte stated they want to make themselves available and respect the timeline. She stated they want to come back with more specifics. Discussion ofCapital Facilities Planning Mr. Brent Robertson, Director of Management & Budgetspoke regarding the CIP. He introduced Ms. Cathy Tomlinalso of Management & Budget.He briefly reviewed the CIP processand the purpose of the CIP.He stated the BOS had recently adopted the CIP and Budget. He stated having the PC involved with the process will be a connecting effort not duplication. He reviewed the Capital Improvement Program, 2006- 2010. He stated the PC could be involved in prioritizing currently Unfunded Projects. Mr. Covey stated they will need to make sure there is no overlap of duties.Mr. McNeil expressed concern regarding overlap of duties with those of the CIP committee. Mr. Covey stated some of the unfunded projects may be able to be consolidated. He stated the PC could assist in identifying future facility needs. Ms. Scheid noted they could take a more long range planning stance. Ms. Hooker stated it is important for the PC to be involved in this process and this would help facilitate that involvement.Mr. Jarrell suggested visiting sites they are considering. Mr. Robertsonsuggested having Department Heads come to speak to the commissioners abouttheprojects. Mr. Azar stated it is important to identify theindividual rolesof the CIP Committee and the PC. He suggested using this year as part of a learning process. Mr. Thomason stated it is important to be organized by defining what the PC is expected to do, how that differs from what the CIP Committeeis responsible for and when the PC’s work would need to be finished.Mr. Robertsonnoted the processes should be complimentary not joint. Discussion ofSteep Slope Ordinance Mr. Holladay spoke regarding the development of a Steep Slope Ordinance. He reviewed Concepts of Hillside Development from Glendora, California. He provided an overview of terms and concepts. He discussed the approachesof other localities to protectsteep slopesinAlbemarle County, Colorado Springs, CO, and Oregon.He 2 statedsome localities require engineering certification. He stated he has given information to staff to review and research. He suggested having a consultant design slope hazard mapping. Mr. Mahoney stated Real Estate Valuation has a type of soil analysis map which may be helpful.Mr. Holladay stated he would provide more ordinance options to the commission in approximately one month. Ms. Hooker stated the lot is not always as offensive and problematic as the road leading to the lot. Mr. Azarstated he hoped the ordinance would be straight forward and easily understood. Comments of Planning Commissioners and Planning Staff Ms. Scheid stated she would notify the commissioners of the BOS/PC Joint Worksessionas soon as a date is established. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 6:12p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Approved: Secretary, Roanoke County Planning Commission 3