Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2/5/2019 - Minutesemud# of jqmmofw PLANNING COMMISSION 1838 PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES FEBRUARY 5,20 19 Commissioners Present: Mr. Wayne Bower Mr. Troy Henderson Mr. Rick James Mr. Paul Mahoney Mr. Jim Woltz (arrived after site visit) Staff Present: Mr. Philip Thompson, Secretary Mr. Peter Lubeck, Senior Assistant County Attorney Ms. Megan Cronise Ms. Becky James Mr. Alex Jones Ms. Cecile Newcomb Ms, Susan McCoy, Recording Secretary Work Session Mr. Henderson called the meeting to order at 4:02 p.m. Approval of Agenda Mr. Mahoney made a motion to approve the agenda, which passed 4-0. Approval of Minutes Mr. Mahoney made a motion to approve the minutes of January 2, 2019, and January 15, 2019, which passed 4-0. Consent Agenda Ms. James provided an overview of the petition of Skyway Towers, including the concept plan, surrounding zoning, and future land use designation. She stated a community meeting regarding the petition will be held on February 21, 2019, from 6,30 p.m. — 8:00 p.m. at the Back Creek Fire Station, 7125 Bent Mountain Road. Ms. James, Mr. Thompson, and the Commissioners discussed setback requirements, fall distance concerns, and proximity to the Blue Ridge Parkway. Mr. Thompson and the Commissioners reviewed the 419 Town Center revised plan, including the updated traffic chart. Mr. James made a motion to approve the consent agenda, which passed 4-0. Page 1 of 13 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 5, 2019 2018 Planning Commission Annual Report Mr. Thompson and the Commissioners discussed the revised report, including removal of wireless communications and minor changes to verbiage. Mr. Thompson suggested forwarding the 2018 Planning Commission Annual Report to the Board of Supervisors for their review. Mr. Mahoney made a motion to approve the 2018 Planning Commission Annual Report and forward it to the Board of Supervisors, which passed 4-0. Citizen Comments There were none. Commissioners' and Staff Comments Mr. Thompson provided additional information received from citizens regarding Venture Storage Inc. Mr. Thompson and the Commissioners reviewed procedural issues regarding the public hearing. Mr. Thompson provided an update on the Virginia Class Action Softball Club petition, noting a revised concept plan was submitted as a result of input received at the community meeting. Mr. Thompson and the Commissioners reviewed the revised concept plan. Mr. Thompson and the Commissioners discussed the concept plan regarding the petition of Balzer and Associates, Inc. Mr. Henderson adjourned the meeting for site viewing and dinner at 4:21 p.m. EVENING SESSION Mr. Henderson called the Public Hearing to order at 7:00 p.m. Mr. Woltz gave the invocation and led the pledge of allegiance. 1. The petition of Venture Storage Group, LLC to obtain a Special Use Permit in a C-2, High Intensity Commercial, District to construct a mini warehouse storage facility on 3.10 acres, located near the 4400 block of South Peak Boulevard, Cave Spring Magisterial District. Ms. James presented a PowerPoint presentation and the staff report, including a brief history of the site, zoning, and future land use designation. She reviewed the concept plan, elevations, existing proffers, and current suggested conditions. Mr. John Prillaman, Esquire, OPN Law, 3140 Chaparral Drive, discussed the concept plan. He stated they have the support of the adjacent landowners. He discussed review comments made by Economic Development regarding the use. He discussed the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), including allowable uses for the property. He stated many of the uses are based on the market at the time the MOU was created. He stated they object to the comment that the proposed use is not considered a retail use. He stated they currently have willing buyers for the property. He noted that due to the location and the existing restaurant, it is difficult to find a buyer. He reviewed parking concerns. He stated Page 2 of 13 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 5, 2019 the petitioner is willing to pay a viable price for the property. He discussed the tax base of the proposed use. He stated the self -storage facility would be a good neighbor, use less utilities, large investment, and well -lit area for surveillance. He stated his client is a willing investor, noting no one else is willing to buy the property. Ms. Jessica Johnson, Cushman & Wakefield/Thalhimer, 10 South Jefferson Street, stated she is the leading broker for this site. She discussed difficult property access and lack of parking. She stated the proposed use is the best use for the property. Mr. Woltz inquired about the length of time the property has been on the market. Ms. Johnson stated the property has been on the market approximately three years. Mr. Woltz inquired about site ready parcels. Ms. Johnson stated only the property next to the steakhouse restaurant is site ready. Mr. Craig Penny, Esquire, Smith/Packett, General Counsel, 4423 Pheasant Ridge Road, stated additional undeveloped sites within South Peak are available if the market changes. He discussed an easement agreement with Texas Roadhouse Restaurant regarding shared parking. Mr. Henderson opened the public hearing for public comment. Mr. James Cowan, Esquire, Cowan Perry, PC, 1328 3rd Street, stated the concerns of the property owner are covered by the Community Development Authority (CDA). He stated the community's concerns carry extra weight because of their investment. He stated it does not meet the economic development vision for the property. He stated the restaurant strengthens the site. He stated the Zoning Ordinance requires a special use permit because the use has an adverse impact to the site. He discussed placing the proposed facility at the back of the development or buffered area. He discussed issues regarding the proposed facility being located over the sewer easement. He stated the facility will be highly visible from the site. He asked if the proposed use is consistent with the entrance to the County. He stated the site has shared access with no private entrance. He also noted the facility will not be screened. He discussed potential issues regarding commercial vehicles accessing the property. He discussed overbuilding for the proposed use. He stated a restaurant would generate more tax revenue. With no other citizens requesting to speak, Mr. Henderson closed the public hearing. Mr. Bower inquired about the findings of the Foti, Flynn, Lowen & Company report. Mr. Prillaman stated they are not able to find a restaurant to locate at this site. He discussed looking at revenue generation based on the area. Mr. Woltz inquired about the architectural rendering. Mr. Prillaman displayed the architectural rendering. Mr. Woltz stated he is unsure the building needs to be screened. He inquired about future multi -use of the proposed facility. Mr. Prillaman discussed this issue, noting he is unsure if it could be developed into office space. Mr. Woltz stated he appreciates the petitioner wanting to invest in Page 3 of 13 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 5, 2099 Roanoke County. Mr. Mahoney inquired about the height of the structure. Mr. Brian DeLong, SmithlPackett, Construction Manager, stated the height would be 32-35 feet. Mr. Mahoney inquired about building lot coverage. Mr. DeLong discussed this issue. Mr. Mahoney inquired about the sewer easement. Mr. DeLong stated they are able to relocate the sewer line, noting they have consulted with Western Virginia Water Authority regarding this issue. Mr. Mahoney inquired about the market study's reference to U -Haul and truck rentals. Mr. DeLong stated they are not going to do that use. Mr. James noted the petitioner is asking for a special use permit in a C-2 High Intensity District. He inquired about the petitioner requesting a special use permit in C-2 instead of rezoning to 1-1. Mr. Prillaman stated the special use permit is the easiest way to accomplish their goal. Mr. Bower stated his issue is how big the facility will be on this site. He asked the petitioner if they would be consider making the facility smaller. Mr. Prillaman stated the anticipated size is needed to make their numbers work. Mr. Mahoney made a motion to recommend denial of the request. He stated he is disappointed with the market study, noting the tax study is misleading. He stated that he was County Attorney when SmithlPackett promised a vision at South Peak, noting none of this has happened. He stated they were told the offices at Pheasant Ridge would be moved to the South Peak location, which has not happened. He stated the proposed use is an industrial use. He stated it is inconsistent, too large, industrial, and does not facilitate Smith/Packett's promise. He stated it will have a detrimental effect on the CDA. Mr. Woltz stated he feels differently, noting there has been a market shift. He stated the development is not offensive. He stated this type of development will not be adverse or prevent development. He stated he hopes it will spur development. Mr. James stated the CDA's intended purpose is for the highest and best use for the development. He stated he has had a difficult time seeing the proposed use as retail, noting it identifies more with industrial. Mr. Bower inquired about Economic Development's comments. Mr. Thompson stated they were basing their comments using the Proforma of 2090. Mr. Bower discussed other developments and plans nearby, including 419 Town Center study area with more residential units. He stated people will be looking for storage, noting there is a need for it. He stated he does have an issue with the size of the proposed facility. Mr. Woltz stated the County has to look at the long-term shift in the market. Mr. James stated he is confident there is a demand for this use. He stated he struggles with this parcel not being rezoned for the proposed use but instead being a special use permit request. Mr. Mahoney suggested the facility be placed where it is less visible, noting this area is a gateway to the area. Mr. Woltz stated the facility needs to have an attractive facade. Mr. Prillaman discussed the rendering. Mr. Thompson called the roll and the motion passed (4-1) with the following vote: AYES; Bower, James, Henderson, Mahoney NAYES: Woltz ABSTAIN: None Page 4 of 13 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 5, 2019 Mr. Thompson stated the Board of Supervisors Public Hearing regarding this petition will be held on Tuesday, February 26, 2019. 2. The petition of Economic Development Authority of Roanoke County et al to amend the master plan for the Center for Research and Technology and to remove the proffered condition on properties totaling approximately 480.21 acres zoned PTD, Planned Technology District, located on Glenmary Drive and Corporate Circle, Catawba Magisterial District. Mr. Thompson provided a history of the PTD. He discussed separating the PTD standards and covenants from the Zoning Ordinance. He discussed the proposed changes to the permitted uses, surrounding zoning, and future land use designation. He stated the applicants include Novozymes, Tecton, Economic Development Authority, and AEP. Mr. Henderson inquired about AEP's parcel. Mr. Thompson discussed this issue. He discussed the zoning and future land use designation. He noted additional information regarding this request was forwarded to adjacent property owners. He discussed concerns of residents regarding connecting with Dow Hallow Road. He stated the current plan negates that issue. Mr. Henderson opened the public hearing for public comment. With no citizens requesting to speak, Mr. Henderson closed the public hearing. Mr. Henderson made a motion to recommend approval of the request. Mr. Thompson called the roll and the motion passed (5-0) with the following vote: AYES: Bower, James, Henderson, Mahoney, Woltz NAYES: None ABSTAIN: None Mr. Thompson stated the Board of Supervisors Public Hearing regarding this petition will be held on Tuesday, February 26, 2419. 3. The petition of Rhonda S. Conner to obtain a Special Use Permit in a R-1 S, Low Density Residential, District with a special use permit, to acquire a multiple dog permit on 4.68 acres, located at 6185 Bent Mountain Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. Ms. Newcomb presented the staff report and PowerPoint presentation, including an aerial view of the property, zoning, future land use designation, and site photos. She reviewed the definition of a multiple dog permit. She stated no structural changes to the property are planned. Ms. Rhonda Conner stated in 1990 she obtained a kennel with no issues. She stated she is requesting to be permitted to acquire two additional dogs. She stated she would like to have additional pets. Mr. James inquired about her current pets. Ms. Conner stated she previously bred Doberman Pinchers. She stated she would like to acquire a breeding pair. Ms. Newcomb stated the Zoning Ordinance restriction does not apply to puppies under four months old. Ms. Conner stated Page 5 of 13 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 5, 2019 she does not plan to have more than one litter of puppies per year. Mr. Woltz inquired if she would be doing grooming and boarding of dogs. Ms. Conner stated she has no interest in that type of activity. Mr. Woltz inquired if she could limit her dogs to four. She stated she prefers to have five so she can have a breeding pair. Mr. Woltz asked if the dogs would stay indoors. She stated the dog stay indoors at night. Mr. Woltz inquired if the petitioner plans to have a commercial kennel. Ms. Conner stated she just want to have a breeding pair of dogs. She stated she is not requesting any signage. Mr. Woltz inquired if the petitioner was agreeable to conditions, including having no boarding, no grooming, and having only one litter of puppies per year. Mr. Thompson discussed this issue, stating if the petitioner wanted to board dogs it would need to be a commercial kennel application not multiple dog permit. He stated grooming is considered personal services. He stated if the petition had five acres, a special use permit would not be required. Ms. Conner stated her yard is chain-link fence with no runs. Mr. Henderson opened the public hearing for public comment. Mr. William Gust, 6157 Bent Mountain Road, stated he lives in a house adjacent to the petitioner. He stated the prior owner of the property had a dog which was noisy. He discussed the statute regarding no commercial activity being permitted. He requested the special use permit be specific to the petitioner and not go with the land. He discussed laws regarding breeding and selling of dogs and commercial kennels. With no other citizens requesting to speak, Mr. Henderson closed the public hearing. Mr. Woltz inquired if the special use could be limited to the current owner of the property. Mr. Lubeck stated that a special use permit always runs with the parcel. Mr. James inquired about the sale of dogs being a commercial use. Mr. Lubeck discussed this issue. Mr. Bower inquired if the Commission could apply a condition permitting only one litter of puppies per year. Mr. Thompson stated they could apply that condition, noting enforcement of that condition would be very difficult. Mr. Bower suggested adding one litter per year since the adjacent neighbor is concerned about this issue. Mr. Bower made a motion to recommend approval of the request with the following conditions 1. The maximum number of dogs shall be limited to five. 2. The breeding of dogs shall be limited to one (1) litter per year, Mr. Thompson called the roll and the motion passed (3-2) with the following vote: AYES: Bower, James, Mahoney NAYES: Henderson, Woltz ABSTAIN: None Page 6 of 13 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 5, 2019 Mr. Thompson stated the Board of Supervisors Public Hearing regarding this petition will be held on Tuesday, February 26, 2019. 4. The petition of Virginia Class Action Softball Club to rezone approximately 11.03 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential, District to C-2, High Intensity Commercial, District for a commercial outdoor sports and recreation facility, located at 4774 Pioneer Drive, Vinton Magisterial District. Mr. Jones presented the staff report and a PowerPoint presentation, including a brief history, current site conditions, zoning, and future land use designation. He reviewed the concept plan, photos of the site, and property access. He discussed input received at the community meeting on January 24, 2019. He reviewed the revised concept plan received on January 30, 2019, with changes to the entrance, parking, and fieldhouse. Mr. James inquired about other potential uses for this property. Mr. Jones stated the petitioner would have to submit an additional application to change the use if the rezoning is approved with proffers. Mr. Mahoney inquired about the spring box which is on the property. Mr. Jones discussed the location of the spring box. Mr. Ben Crew, Balzer and Associates, Inc., stated the petitioner is the contract purchaser subject to approval of the rezoning request. He introduced the representatives for the petitioners, Mr. Richard Ewers and Ms. Dee Dee Burgoyne. He discussed the softball club organization, noting it will fit into the fabric of the community. He discussed changes made to the concept plan after the community meeting, including modifying property access, providing adequate parking, and field house location. He discussed landscaping and buffering. He stated the property has unique challenges, including nearby Route 460, Glade Creek, railroad tracks, and residential development. He discussed the proffered concept plan, noting the commitment of the applicant. Mr. James inquired if access to the area would be controlled by a gate at night. Mr. Crew affirmed it will be controlled by a gate after hours. Mr. James inquired about the Pioneer Drive entrance. Mr. Crew discussed this issue. He discussed safety issues if entrance was directly from Bonsack Road, noting they want to limit access on Bonsack Road when the park is not being used. Mr. James inquired about VDOT comments. Mr. Crew discussed the entrance from Bonsack Road, including issues regarding alignment and sight distance. Mr. James inquired if the TIA had been updated. Mr. Crew stated the TIA had been updated, noting the warrants analysis did not change. Mr. James stated it is a challenging site and it will give the community a resource. Mr. Woltz inquired about the abandonment of the Pioneer Drive. Mr. Crew discussed this issue. Mr. Woltz inquired about a turn -around. Mr. Crew discussed difficulty with turn -around regarding snow being pushed up to the end of the road. Mr. Mahoney inquired about lighting plans. Mr. Crew discussed the photometric study and lighting design. Mr. Henderson inquired about parking spaces and overflow parking. Mr. Crew stated parking research was based on two games or four teams at one time. Mr. Woltz inquired about parking lot surface. Mr. Crew discussed this issue. Page 7 of 13 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 5, 2419 Mr. Henderson opened the public hearing for public comment. Mr. David Bandy, 4959 Glade Creek Road, stated the community does not have a problem with the fields, He asked that the petitioner look closer at having entrance off of Route 460, noting having entrance from Bonsack Road is a concern. He stated he is concerned about the old Bonsack House and would like 100 foot buffer around the house. He suggested putting a fence up as far as possible. He stated he is president of Spectrum Design. He asked that the petitioner make the building charcoal gray so it will blend into area. Mr. Dale Ellis, 4728 Glade Creek, stated he has lived in his residence twenty-four years. He stated sports are good for children's social skills. He stated a fence should installed to prevent the field from becoming a parking lot. He stated Glade Creek Road cannot handle increased traffic, noting he is fearful additional traffic would overflow onto Pioneer Drive. Ms. Sherrie Klink, 4931 Glade Creek Road, stated she has lived in her home since 2006. She stated it is a beautiful and rural area, noting she is concerned about the negative impact to the area. She stated she is concerned the only entrance to the neighborhood will be negatively impacted. She stated Glade Creek Road cannot handle the increased traffic. She stated many concerns were expressed at the community meeting and suggested moving the entrance to Route 460. She stated she is concerned about noise, lighting, parking, traffic, and safety issues. She noted the petitioner is unsure of the schedule. She stated the petitioner could lease the park to other leagues or open the door to less desirable uses. She stated she hopes the current environment will be maintained and preserved. Ms. Kathy Fireball, 4703 Phyllis Road, stated she loves sports, noting they are good for the youth. She stated she is concerned about the aesthetics of the neighborhood. She stated her home is directly off of Bonsack Road. She discussed concerns regarding speeding on the two lane road. She stated she has difficulty getting out from her neighborhood onto Route 460. She stated there are no stop lights to manage traffic. She stated trucks come through their area to avoid nearby traffic lights. She stated she wants the entrance to be directly off of Route 460. With no other citizens requesting to speak, Mr. Henderson closed the public hearing. Mr. James inquired about access off of Route 460. Mr. Ray Varney, VDOT, discussed vacating a portion of Pioneer Drive, noting it would require an action from the Board of Supervisors. He stated VDOT's preference is to limit access and eliminate conflict points on Route 460. Mr. James inquired about a fence along Pioneer Drive. Mr. Crew discussed vehicle access along Pioneer Drive. He discussed possibly placing fence along the property lines. Mr. Woltz inquired about VDOT right-of-way. Mr. Crew discussed this issue. Mr. James discussed having Pioneer Road abandoned. Mr. Crew discussed this issue, noting they Page 8 of 13 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 5, 2019 would then want to move the access to Glade Creek. Mr. Thompson stated the purpose of the fence would be to keep people out and would be in floodplain and floodway. He stated if it is floodway it would put a burden on the applicant by limiting access for walking and fishing. Mr. Mahoney discussed the process regarding vacating the road. Mr. Thompson discussed the rezoning procedures regarding proffered conditions. Mr. Bandy stated he is concerned about patrons parking on Glade Creek Road and walking to ball fields. Mr. Crew discussed the concept plan, noting the new access point has resolved the parking issue. Mr. Woltz inquired about the color of the building. Mr. Crew started they have not chosen the building color but it will be complimentary to the park. Mr. Woltz inquired about screening near Mr. Bandy's property. Mr. Crew discussed buffering and screening requirements. Mr. James made a motion to recommend approval of the request with the following proffered condition: 1. The owner hereby proffers general conformance with the "Scrappers Softball Fields — Development Plan" prepared by Balzer and Associates, Inc. dated January 30, 2019 subject to any changes required by the applicable review agencies during the site plan review process. Mr. Thompson called the roll and the motion passed (5-0) with the following vote: AYES: Bower, James, Henderson, Mahoney, Waltz NAYES: None ABSTAIN: None Mr. Thompson stated the Board of Supervisors Public Hearing regarding this petition will be held on Tuesday, February 26, 2019. Mr. Henderson provided a break beginning at 9:46 p.m. and reconvening at 9:58 p.m. 5. Proposed amendment to the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment would change the future land use designation of four (4) parcels south of Colonial Avenue, between 4904 Colonial Avenue and 4920 Colonial Avenue, from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition. The properties are located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. Mr. Thompson provided a brief history of the proposed amendment, surrounding properties, zoning, and future land use designation. He noted this proposed amendment was requested by the Commission. Mr. Henderson opened the public hearing for public comment. Page 9 of 13 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 5, 2019 Ms. Nancy Spillman, 4904 Colonial Avenue, stated that when she purchased her property it was a great neighborhood. She stated 4920 Colonial Avenue was one parcel and later divided for patio homes which were never built. She stated she appreciates their neighborhood and does not want it to change. She stated she does not want her property's future land use designation to be changed to Transition. With no other citizens requesting to speak, Mr. Henderson closed the public hearing. Mr. Mahoney stated that when the petition for 4920 Colonial Avenue was submitted the future land use designation was Neighborhood Conservation, noting the current future land use designation is non -conforming for the proposed use. He discussed the surrounding zoning, noting it goes from residential to high intensity commercial. He stated the request regarding 4920 Colonial Avenue is a good application. He discussed the location to draw the line for commercial development. He stated that Balzer and Associates, Inc. have tried to abide by the Colonial Avenue Corridor Design Guidelines, noting there is tremendous commercial pressure in this area. Mr. James discussed the surrounding future land use designation and his concern regarding Transition designation abutting Core designation. He discussed the future land use designation of other nearby areas, including Brambleton Avenue and Cave Spring Lane. He stated he agreed it should be Transition adjoining Core. Mr. Mahoney noted they were looking for Transition for 4920 Colonial Avenue but included 4904 Colonial Avenue to make the designation neat. He stated'the designation is similar on the other side of Colonial Avenue. Mr. Bower inquired about how the change would adversely affect Ms. Spillman's property. Mr. Mahoney noted it would add commercial pressure on her property. Mr. Woltz stated it is not right to inflict this change on the property owner, noting he agrees to not include Ms. Spillman's property in the designation change. Mr. James agreed to include 4920 Colonial Avenue where it abuts to commercial property. Mr. Thompson stated changing the land use designation of the property to Transition does not change the use of the property. Mr. Bower inquired about this change affecting property taxes. Mr. Thompson stated it will not affect the taxes unless the use of the property changes. Mr. Mahoney made a motion to adopted the resolution recommending approval of the amendment for three (3) of the properties located at 4920 Colonial Avenue. Mr. Thompson called the roll and the motion passed (5-0) with the following vote: AYES: Bower, James, Henderson, Mahoney, Woltz NAYES: None ABSTAIN: None Mr. Thompson stated the Board of Supervisors Public Hearing regarding this amendment will be held on Tuesday, February 26, 2019. Page 10 of 13 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 5, 2019 6. The petition of Balzer and Associates, Inc. to rezone approximately 1.17 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential, District to C-1, how Intensity Commercial, District for a medical office, located at 4920 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District. Ms. James provided the staff report, including an overview of property, current zoning, future land use designation, and proffered conditions. Mr. Ben Crew, Balzer and Associates, Inc., introduced Mr. Rodney Meador, Architect. Mr. Crew reviewed the concept plan. He stated they have the commitment of the owner to stay within the Colonial Avenue Corridor Design Guidelines. He discussed the proffered conditions and building pattern. He discussed input received from citizens at the community meeting. He reviewed the proffered concept plan. He also discussed the landscaping plan including buffering. He stated they are creating one access to the three combined properties. He stated the concept plan meets or exceeds the guidelines. He discussed uses of adjacent and nearby properties. Mr. Mahoney inquired about the guidelines regarding the proposed parking lot location. Mr. Crew discussed the location of the parking area, noting it will serve both floors of the proposed building. Mr. Mahoney inquired about the traffic impact analysis (TIA) and addition of turn lanes. Mr. Crew discussed trip generation information for peak hours and warrants. He discussed the site plan process, noting VDOT would be involved in that process and determine if turn lanes would be needed. Mr. James discussed the turn lane analysis, noting there is not a right turn requirement. Mr. Crew reviewed the TIA chart. Mr. Ray Varney, VDOT, discussed warrants, noting the traffic on Colonial Avenue is increasing. He stated additional discussion regarding a left turn lane will be needed. Mr. Mahoney discussed the increase of commercial pressure on Colonial Avenue, noting widening of the road may adversely affect the neighborhood. Mr. Henderson opened the public hearing for public comment. Ms. Nancy Spillman, 4904 Colonial Avenue, requested the Commission not approve the rezoning request. She stated it is already difficult to get out of her driveway onto Colonial Avenue. She stated the proposed development would increase problems with traffic, noting they already have difficulty getting to mailbox, mowing, and shoveling their property. She stated they do not need another commercial business in this area. She discussed other commercial properties which are currently for lease or for sale. She stated the facility will be in operation at night. She discussed the proposed placement of the driveway. She discussed concerns regarding stormwater runoff. Mr. Bill Martin, 4919 Colonial Avenue, stated he lives diagonally across from the proposed development. He discussed current issues regarding stormwater runoff from the roundabout. He stated the stormwater runoff washes his driveway out. He discussed concerns regarding the property being a 2417 sleep center. He discussed current difficulty getting mail from the mailbox due to traffic. He discussed concerns regarding the increased traffic. He stated Page 11 of 13 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 5, 2019 commercial property will produce trash. He discussed noise issues including dumpsters being emptied at 4:00-5:00 a.m. and plows removing snow from the parking lot. Mr. Randy Waddell, 4785 Sunnyside Drive, stated he is not in favor of the development. He discussed concerns regarding lighting and increased traffic. He stated he does not see a need for the clinic in the neighborhood. He stated the development will drive property values down. He stated the parking lot in the back will affect his property more. With no other citizens requesting to speak, Mr. Henderson closed the public hearing. Mr. Mahoney inquired about the use of proposed building. Mr. Crew discussed the daily operation of the sleep center, noting patients visit the center during the day and are sent home with a sleep monitoring device. Mr. Mahoney inquired about a previous request to rezone the property. Ms. James discussed the previous rezoning request to rezone from R-1 to C-1 to operate an insurance company using the existing structure. She noted it was withdrawn prior to the Board of Supervisors Public Hearing. Mr. James discussed how commercial services are market driven. Mr. Woltz stated this property fits within transition more than residential. Mr. Mahoney stated he understands the community's concerns regarding impacts of the development Mr. James made a motion to recommend approval of the request with the following proffered conditions: 1. Concept Plan Conformance. The owner hereby proffers substantial conformance with the "New Colonial Medical Office Building — Development Plan" (Exhibit A) prepared by Balzer and Associates, Inc. dated December 14, 2018 subject to any changes required by the County of Roanoke during the site plan review process. 2. Building Design. The owner hereby proffers substantial conformance with the "New Colonial Medical Office Building" prepared by Matter & Meadow Architects dated December 14, 2018. Mr. Thompson called the roll and the motion passed (5-0) with the following vote: AYES: Bower, James, Henderson, Mahoney, Woltz NAYES: None ABSTAIN: None Mr. Thompson stated the Board of Supervisors Public Hearing regarding this petition will be held on Tuesday, February 26, 2019. Page 12 of 13 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 5, 2019 Citizens' Comments There were none. Comments of Planning Commissioners and Planning Staff There were none. Final Orders 1. The petition of Virginia Interventional Pain and Spine Center to amend the proffered conditions on approximately 3.2 acres zoned C-1 C, Low Intensity Commercial, District with conditions, located in or near the 3300, 3400, and 3500 Mocks of Ogden Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. The amended proffers would amend the concept plan and freestanding light pole height. Proffers dealing with building square footage, building height, signage, screening and buffering, stormwater management, development phasing, sewer easements, and use restrictions would be deleted was approved by the Board of Supervisors at a Public Hearing on January 22, 2019. With no further business or comments, Mr. Henderson adjourned the meeting at 11:05 p. M. Respectfully Submitted: Susan McCoy Recor egetary, Roanoke County Planning Commission flip T pson immission Immission Page 13 of 13