Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/4/2019 - Minutespmin- ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 1838 PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES NOVEMBER 4, 2019 Commissioners Present: Mr. Wayne Bower Mr. Troy Henderson Mr, Rick James Mr. Paul Mahoney (evening session only) Mr. Jim Woltz (evening session only) Staff Present: Mr, Philip Thompson, Secretary Ms. Mary Beth Nash, Senior Assistant County Attorney Ms. Becky James Mr. Alex Jones Ms. Alyssa Dunbar Ms. Susan McCoy, Recording Secretary Work Session Mr. Henderson called the meeting to order at 4-00 p.m,. Approval of Agenda Mr. James made a motion to approve the agenda, which passed 3-0. Approval of Minutes Mr. Bower made a motion to approve the minutes of October 1, 2019 which passed 3-0. Consent Agenda Ms. James provided an overview of the petition of Bane International Company, LLC, including zoning, future land use designation, and concept plan. She stated a community will be held on November 12, 2019, at 7:00 p.m, at the Roanoke Valley Regional Fire Training Center, 1220 Kessler Mill Road. Mr. James made a motion to approve the consent agenda, which passed 3-0. Citizen Comments There were none. Commissioners' and Staff Comments There were none. Mr. Henderson adjourned the meeting for site viewing at 4:11 p.m. Page 1 of 11 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES EVENING SESSION NOVEMBER 4, 2019 Mr. Henderson called the Public Hearing to order at 7:00 p.m. Mr. Woltz gave the invocation and led the pledge of allegiance. Mr. Mahoney made a motion to approve the minutes of September 17, 2019 which passed 4-0-1, with Mr. Henderson abstaining. The petition of David and Stace Todd to obtain a special use permit in a R-1, Low Density Residential, District to comply with the use and design standards associated with an accessory apartment in an accessory building on approximately 0.346 acre, located at 1047 Barrens Village Court, Hollins Magisterial District. Ms. James presented the staff report, including a brief history of the petition, zoning, future land use designation, and setbacks. She discussed the building permit process and status. Mr. Bower inquired about the setback requirements. Ms. James and Mr. Thompson discussed setback requirements. Mr. Bower inquired about the building permit being suspended. Ms. James stated building permits are suspended after six months if the construction is not completed or inspected. She stated the petitioner was sent a letter informing them of the suspended permit. Mr. Bower inquired about inspections. Ms. James discussed this issue. Mr. Mahoney inquired about pending code enforcement action. Ms. James discussed the enforcement status. Mr. Mahoney inquired about the layout of the accessory apartment. Ms. James discussed the layout, noting the appearance of a stove in the structure makes it an accessory apartment and a violation. Ms. ,tames and the Commissioners discussed the building and zoning regulations and standards. Ms. James noted if the petition is not approved, the structure could be permitted if it is only a workshop or garage. Mr. Thompson and the Commissioners discussed the intent, purpose, and history of the regulations and standards regarding single family dwellings. They discussed the two driveways on the property. He stated the regulation has been amended several times in the past. Mr. Woltz discussed the uniqueness of the property which fronts on two roads. Mr. Thompson stated that the property is currently in violation. Mr. Henderson inquired if the structure was currently occupied. Ms. Stace Todd stated her daughter is currently living in the structure. Mr. Bower asked if the petitioner has spoken with the neighbors about the property line. Ms. Todd stated she tried to move property line but could not. She stated the building is almost complete, noting her husband is the contractor. Mr. Woltz noted the petitioner wants the opportunity for the accessory apartment if their special needs son returns home. Ms. Todd stated they have no intent to sell property. Mr. Henderson opened the public hearing for public comment. Mr. Thompson stated a letter supporting the petition was received from David Jamison and Donna Jamison. He stated an email opposing the petition was received from Chad and Jennifer King. He noted copies have been provided to the Commissioners. With no citizens requesting to speak, Mr. Henderson closed the public hearing. Page 2 of 11 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 4, 2019 Mr. James stated he has concerns regarding issues with the petitioner's neighbor and the Building Commissioner. Mr. Mahoney staffed the County has been attempting to relax some of the standards for accessory apartments. He discussed safety concerns regarding the structure not being completed with a final inspection in five years. He discussed issues regarding the setbacks. Mr. Thompson stated it meets standards for an accessory building but not an accessory apartment. Mr. Bower discussed his concern regarding an additional violation with the driveway if special use permit is approved. Mr. Woltz suggested placing time constraints on the project. Ms. Nash noted that issue does not fall within the purview of the Planning Commission. Mr. Bower inquired about regulations regarding an accessory building and accessory apartment. Mr. Thompson discussed issues regarding the presence of a stove and the additional driveway. Mr. Henderson noted the setback issue could be remedied with the removal of the stove. Mr. James discussed with the petitioner the significance of the presence of the stove. Ms. Todd stated they have already removed the stove from the structure. Mr. Thompson discussed the violation of the stove in an accessory building, noting it includes the building being wired for a stove. Mr. Mahoney inquired about requesting a variance from the Board of Zoning Appeals. Ms. Nash and Mr. Thompson discussed this issue. Mr. Bower made a motion to recommend approval of the request. Mr. Thompson called the roll and the motion passed (5-0) with the following vote: AYES: Bower, Henderson, James, Mahoney, Woltz NAYES: None ABSTAIN: None Mr. Thompson stated the Board of Supervisors Public Hearing regarding this petition will be held on Tuesday, November 19, 2019, at 3:00 p.m. 2. The petition of Fellowship Community Church to rezone property to remove the proffered conditions and to obtain a special use permit for a religious assembly on approximately 3.50 acres zoned C -2C, High Intensity Commercial, District with conditions, located near the 6500 block of Merriman Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. Mr. Jones presented the staff report and a PowerPoint presentation, including zoning, use and design standards, and a brief history of the petition. He reviewed the current proffered conditions which the petitioner is requesting to be removed. He discussed the concept plan and future land use designation. He noted the use is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. He discussed the suggested conditions for the special use permit if the petition is approved. Mr. James stated he is concerned about existing condition #1 which lists uses which would not be permitted on the site, noting the property does not have a good record for development. Mr. Jones discussed the history of previously planned development of the property, noting currently there is not much commercial activity in the area. Mr. James discussed his concern regarding unintended use of the property if the church is not constructed. Mr. Woltz stated he is concerned about Page 3 of I I ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 4, 2019 rezoning from industrial to commercial use. Mr. Thompson discussed procedural issues, noting two actions are necessary for this petition which includes both a rezoning and special use permit request. He noted the suggested conditions are applicable only if it is a church. Mr. Mahoney inquired about the special use permit. Mr. Thompson discussed procedural changes, noting the General Assembly has amended regulations regarding vesting rights of development. Mr. Mahoney inquired about funding regarding the road which leads to Starkey Park. Mr. Thompson and Ms. Nash discussed this issue. Mr. Jones noted the road is a public road with public right-of-way. He stated he can research to see if the road is currently a VDOT maintained road. Mr. Woltz inquired about property entrances. Mr. Jones stated the property has two entrances with one being on Merriman Road. Mr. Jones introduced Mr. Barney Horrell, Brushy Mountain Engineering, PLLC, and Mr. Robbie Willard, Executive Pastor, Fellowship Community Church. Mr. Horrell stated they had a meeting at Faith Christian School regarding the project. He stated they agreed the proposed location seems to fit the community. He stated Mr. John Fulton will be the architect for the project. He noted it is important to build up out of the floodplain. He stated the floodplain maps are being examined by Lumsden Associates, PC, noting a site will be chosen out of the floodplain. Mr. Woltz inquired about renderings. Mr. Horrell stated they are researching floor plans. Mr. Henderson opened the public hearing for public comment. With no citizens requesting to speak, Mr. Henderson closed the public hearing. Mr. Mahoney inquired if the Commission is comfortable removing the 1998 conditions, noting if religious assembly does not move forward the property would be a C-2 zoning with special use permit conditions. He suggested having two actions, including an action on the removal of the conditions and an action regarding religious assembly. He discussed the tax exempt status of a religious assembly use. He stated the property has not developed, noting it may be because of the current proffered conditions on the property. Mr. Woltz stated the proffered conditions need to be removed, noting much of the site has already been developed. He discussed removing proffers and adding the special use permit. Mr. Bower stated he is in favor of leaving the request as is. Mr. Mahoney made a motion to recommend denial of the request to remove the proffered conditions and to obtain a special use permit for a religious assembly. Mr. Thompson called the roll and the motion failed (1-4) with the following vote: AYES: Mahoney NAYES: Bower, Henderson, James, Woltz ABSTAIN: None Page 4 of 11 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 4, 2079 Mr. Woltz made a motion to recommend approval of the removal of the 1988 rezoning proffered conditions and to obtain a special use permit for a religious assembly with conditions. Mr. James stated he is in agreement with the motion with one edit that the proposed use is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Woltz amended his motion to include that the use is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and to take out any reference to the Comprehensive Plan. The recommended special use permit conditions are: 1. The site shall be developed in substantial conformance with the Development Conceptual Plan for Fellowship Church — Merriman, as prepared by Brushy Mountain Engineering, PLLC and dated September 9, 2019, subject to any changes required by Roanoke County during the Site Plan review process. 2. All freestanding light poles and fixtures shall not exceed fourteen feet in height above grade. Lighting shall be shielded ad directed downward and arranged so glare is not cast onto adjoining properties. 3. Any freestanding signage shall be limited to one monument style sign not to exceed five feet in height and seven feet in width and a maximum size of thirty five square feet. Mr. Mahoney stated the use is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Thompson called the roll and the motion passed (4-1) with the following vote: AYES: Bower, Henderson, James, Woltz NAYES: Mahoney ABSTAIN: None Mr. Thompson stated the Board of Supervisors Public Hearing regarding this petition will be held on Tuesday, November 19, 2019, at 3:00 p.m. Mr. Henderson provided a break beginning at 8:24 p.m. He reconvened the meeting at 8:35 p.m. Mr. Mahoney recused himself from the public hearing regarding the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority due to conflict of interest. 3. The petition of Roanoke Valley Resource Authority to obtain a special use permit for a sanitary landfill on approximately 8.05 acres zoned AG -3, Agricultural/Rural Preserve, District and to amend the special use permit for an existing sanitary landfill (Smith Gap Landfill) on approximately 886.80 acres zoned AG -3S, Agricultural/Rural Preserve, District with a special use permit, located on the northwest side of t=ort Lewis Mountain between Smith Gap, and Bradshaw Road, Catawba Magisterial District. Mr. Thompson presented the staff report and PowerPoint presentation, including an overview of the history of the petition. He discussed the background, policies, and operating procedures adopted in 1991. He reviewed the project site, zoning, and future land use designation. He discussed input received from citizens at the Page 5 of 11 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 4, 2019 community meeting held on October 16, 2019, including environmental concerns, leachate spilling onto roads from trailers, impacts to Bradshaw Road, inadequacy of Bradshaw Road, odors air quality, water quality, groundwater concerns, landfill's services area, operational issues, traffic safety issues, and the need to fix Bradshaw Road. He reviewed the conditions and revisions, including access, conversion, types of waste, operating hours, emergency operations, noise, dust, odors, lighting, pests, citizen complaints, active fill areas, monitoring, screening and buffering, site security, and fire protection and public water. Mr. James stated since the policies and procedures of RVRA are governed by a board, he suggested adding verbiage "as necessary by the board" to the document. Mr. James inquired about the centerline of the transportation corridor. Mr. Woltz inquired about potable water. Mr. Thompson deferred these inquires to the petitioner. Mr. Jim Gwynn, Esquire, stated the corridor is from Montgomery County to the landfill facility. He stated the conditions are acceptable to the petitioner. He stated they are highly regulated by Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). He discussed the length of the railroad, noting it is 4.5 miles long with 1,135 feet on the Roanoke County side. He stated no decision has been made how to do the transfer, noting they will do it the most economical way with the least impact on the environment and neighbors. He stated if they had their own road there would be no need to use Bradshaw Road. Mr. James inquired about permits. Mr. Gwynn stated they have worked hard with staff and do not want to undue progress. Mr. Woltz inquired about the length of time to complete the proposed road. Mr. Gwynn stated construction would take approximately three to six months, noting they would need to grade the railroad bed which would become the road bed. Mr. Woltz inquired about the road. Mr. Gwynn stated the road would be asphalt. Mr. Woltz inquired about a study to determine what would be most economical. Mr. Gwynn stated they have done a lot of analysis, including the cost of overhauling tippers and the life of the tippers. He discussed the obsolescence of the tippers, noting they no longer make them. He noted they have three years remaining on the railroad contract. Mr. Woltz inquired about water availability. Mr. Gwynn stated they have a water well which is technically potable. Mr. Woltz inquired about fire hydrants. Mr. Gwynn stated they do not have fire hydrants. Mr. Henderson inquired about access which is mentioned in first paragraph of the conditions. Mr. Gwynn stated the access would remain the same, noting the need for secondary entrance would be less with proposed road than with the railroad. Mr. Henderson inquired about how often they use secondary entrance. Mr. Dan Miles, RVRA, Chief Executive Officer, stated they use it daily for approximately seven to eight dump trucks. Mr. Bower inquired if the need for all trucks accessing from Bradshaw Road would be eliminated with proposed road. Mr. Gwynn stated there would be virtually no need to use Bradshaw Road. Mr. Woltz inquired about the width of the corridor. Mr. Gwynn discussed this issue, noting it would be a private road with gates approximately 26 feet wide. Mr. Woltz inquired about pull off areas for the trucks on the shoulder of the road. Mr. Gwynn stated it would be a two lane road on Williby Road. Page 6 of 11 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 4, 2019 Mr. Henderson opened the public hearing for public comment. Steven Bandy, 3838 Bradshaw Road, President of the Bradshaw Civic League, stated in 1991 the City of Salem did not want to join the landfill because they could not come up Bradshaw Road. He stated there was a document stating that they would not come up Bradshaw Road. He stated the train did a good job for approximately twenty-five years. He stated the trucks have broken the pavement and make traffic conditions dangerous. He stated they do not want the trucks on Bradshaw Road. Dale Deweese, 4664 Bradshaw Road, stated this is like David vs. Goliath. He stated the RVRA has lawyers, He stated they do not want the trucks. He staffed they have torn the road all to pieces. He stated Bradshaw Road is a designated bicycle route and the trucks will hit someone. He stated the train is the only way to go even if the cost is higher. Courtney Abram, 8301 Berrybrook Drive, stated she lives off of Williby Road and works at Virginia Tech. She stated it is a beautiful rural area. She stated the primary value is our land. She stated this could have an adverse effect on property values and roads. She stated she currently has easy commutes to Blacksburg, Virginia. She stated she is concern about the environmental effects. She stated she hopes the Commission will treat this request with the same gravity as the residents. Darryl Moore, 8801 Williby Road, stated he has seen trucks, including 18 -wheelers with dump beds on Bradshaw Road. He stated he has already seen construction. He discussed safety concerns when exiting their homes. He stated the RVRA road will cross Williby Road in Montgomery County. Mr. Woltz inquired about the number of homes in the area. Mr. Moore stated approximately ten to fourteen houses are in his area. With no other citizens requesting to speak, Mr. Henderson closed the public hearing. Mr. Woltz inquired if RVRA would be studying any of the crossings in the Williby Road area as a safety point. Mr. Gwynn stated the speed limit is low in the area. He stated deliveries are made at certain time of the day. He stated the RVRA road would be blocked with a gate at the intersection. Mr. Woltz inquired about the gate. Mr. Gwynn stated he thinks it will be an electric gate. Mr. James inquired about location that the trucks will access the landfill. Mr. Gwynn stated they currently come through Williby Road and it will remain that way. Mr. Woltz inquired about how many trucks come through the landfill per day. Mr. Gwynn stated the landfill averages approximately fifty trucks per day. He stated they have exhibits in the application regarding cost of gates and signage. Mr. Henderson discussed concern regarding school bus issues if approximately fifty trucks per day are using Bradshaw Road as the primary access. Mr. James inquired about enforcement issues since Bradshaw Road is a public roadway. Mr. Gwynn stated a third party landfill in the New River Valley would be Page 7 of 11 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 4, 2019 used during the conversion. Mr. Henderson suggested adding to the conditions verbiage that RVRA will have their own road and will have an agreement with the New River Valley during the conversion. Mr. Gwynn noted they are not expanding the landfill. Mr. Henderson made a motion to recommend approval of the request, including providing wording to insure Bradshaw Road will not be the primary access. He made the motion with the following conditions: 1. That the reference to the "amended landfill permit conditions and operating policies" referenced in the 1991 Special Use Permit Resolution is now HEREBY REMOVED; the "amended landfill permit conditions and operating policies" are no longer incorporated into the Smith Gap Landfill SUP by reference. 2. The special use permit for a sanitary landfill on the 8.05 acre parcel located at 8765 Williby Road (Tax Map No. 052.00-01-02.08-0000) is granted, and the following conditions shall apply to the special use permit for 8.05 acre parcel and the 878.75 acres for the existing sanitary landfill (886.80 total acres): a. Access: Primary access to the Smith Gap Landfill for the delivery of municipal solid waste shall be along the Transportation Corridor (previously known as the Rail Corridor). In the event the primary access is unavailable for two or more business days, the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority (or subsequent owners) will make reasonable efforts to transport all municipal solid waste to one or more fully permitted third -party sanitary landfills until such time as the primary access can be resumed. In the event that the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority (or subsequent owners) cannot through reasonable efforts contract for sufficient immediate transportation services to transport municipal solid waste to third party landfills, and until sufficient services can be obtained, Bradshaw Road will serve as the secondary access for the delivery of municipal solid waste to the landfill. b. Conversion: If the Transportation Corridor is converted from rail to a road, then all municipal solid waste will be transported to third party landfills during construction of this conversion. G. Types of Waste: Only properly approved waste may be accepted, with the main objective always being to safely dispose of materials and prolong the useful life of the landfill. Wastes designated as "special wastes" shall be disposed of in accordance with current waste management regulations. No hazardous waste will be allowed at any time during the entire life of the landfill. d. Operating Hours: Normal working hours shall be as follows: Delivery of Waste by Authorized Vehicle — Monday through Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.; Delivery of Waste by Rail — Monday through Saturday from 10:00 a.m. — 12:00 a.m.; Operation of all equipment -- Monday through Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. e. Emergency Operations: Emergency operations shall allow for extended hours on all days and Sundays whenever an emergency has been duly declared by the County Administrator of Roanoke County or his/her designee. Circumstances for Emergency Operations include, but are not limited to, natural disasters or short-term (less than 2 days), temporary operating interruptions resulting from equipment failure or contract service interruptions. Emergency operations may require use of third -party landfills or use of secondary access to the Smith Gap Landfill (Bradshaw Road). Page 8 of 11 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 4, 2019 f. Noise: Noise levels may not exceed the following limits: 80 db (decibels) at landfill site borders; 65 db (decibels) at surrounding residences. g. Dust: Dust shall be controlled in accordance with the landfill's state solid waste facility permit. Problem areas arising during dry seasons will be controlled with water. Access roads should be cleaned and dust controlled with water if excessive amounts of dust are generated. h. Odors: Odors shall be controlled in accordance with the landfill's state solid waste facility permit. If problem odors exist that adversely impact surrounding residents, deodorizing agents may be used. All holding tanks for leachate collection systems shall be in enclosed structures. i. Lighting: Sufficient lighting must be maintained at all times to facilitate normal operations and to provide adequate security over the landfill site. All exterior lighting fixtures shall be designed, located and arranged so as not to direct glare on adjoining streets or residential properties. The intensity at adjoining streets or residential properties shall not exceed 0.5 foot candles. Lighting shall be limited to fixtures attached to buildings as necessary for security and operations and freestanding poles of not more than 16 feet in height. j. Pests. A bonded, licensed pest control company will be retained throughout the active life of the landfill to provide preventive inspections and treatments. Adjoining property owners who incur pest problems that are proven to be directly related to the landfill operation must be provided proper extermination at the landfill owner's expense. k. Citizen Complaints: A telephone number will be provided for use of surrounding residents including those in the Transportation Corridor to call in complaints (noise, dust, odor, pests, or other issues). These calls will be recorded/logged and corrective actions documented. The complaint log shall be open to public inspection. I. Active Fill Areas: The active fill areas of the landfill shall comply with the landfill's state solid waste facility permit. Fill areas should be designed as far as practical from adjoining properties to provide maximum buffering, and in no case should extend within 100 feet of the landfill boundary line. M. Monitoring: The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality conducts inspections during the year to ensure compliance with the landfill's state solid waste facility permit. Any violations shall be reported and made public information. The Roanoke Valley Resource Authority (or subsequent owner) shall take whatever steps are necessary to immediately correct any violation. n. Screening and Buffering: i. The following buffer yard and plantings shall be established around the perimeter of the landfill property, except adjacent to an existing residential property or private right-of-way. Trees shall be planted in three separate rows or in clusters, where natural land characteristics allow within the buffer yard. 50 -foot buffer yard with three large deciduous trees with an ultimate height of 50 feet or greater per 100 linear feet of buffer yard, five large evergreen trees with an ultimate height of 50 feet or greater per 100 linear feet of buffer yard, and seven small evergreen trees with an ultimate height of 15 feet or greater per 100 linear feet of buffer yard. ii. In areas adjacent to an existing residential property or public or private right-of-way, the following shall be established and Page 9 of 11 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 4, 2019 maintained around the perimeter of the landfill property. Trees shall be planted in three separate rows or in clusters, where natural land characteristics allow with the buffer yard. 100 -foot buffer yard with six large deciduous trees with an ultimate height of 50 feet or greater per 100 linear feet of buffer yard, ten large evergreen trees with an ultimate height of 50 feet or greater per 100 linear feet of buffer yard, and fifteen small evergreen trees with an ultimate height of 15 feet or greater per 100 linear feet of buffer yard. iii. Buffer yards may only be used for passive recreation, such as pedestrian, bike or equestrian trails, provided that the total width of the buffer is maintained and all other requirements and conditions are met. iv. Buildings, active landfill areas, equipment storage areas and other facilities shall be landscaped in such a manner as to enhance (but not necessarily screen) the visual appearance from adjoining properties. o. Site Security: All facilities shall be surrounded on all sides by natural barriers, fencing, or an equivalent means of controlling vehicles access and preventing illegal disposal. All access will be limited by gates, and such gates shall be securable and equipped with locks. All fencing utilized at the facility shall be adequate to control unauthorized access. Gates shall be at the main entrance as well as the entrance to additional service areas. Access to a solid waste disposal facility (landfill) shall be permitted only when an attendant is on duty and only during operating hours, unless otherwise specified in the facility permit, such as for rail delivery of waste. Each solid waste disposal facility should be provided with an adequately lighted and heated shelter where operating personnel can exercise site control and have access to essential sanitation facilities. Lighting, heat and sanitation facilities may be provided by portable equipment, as necessary. Dusk to dawn lights may be placed around buildings and at each of the security gates. All sanitary landfills will be equipped with permanent or mobile telephone or radio communications. The main security gate should be able to communicate with all necessary areas of the landfill. The operator is responsible for safety hazards to operating personnel through an active safety program. Security rules and regulations shall be posted at each gate. Security guard of landfill personnel shall be on site 24 hours each day. All vehicle access points to the Transportation Corridor shall be properly gated, with lock, and shall be posted with "No Trespassing" signs. Signs will also be posted at intervals along the Transportation Corridor. P. Fire Protection and Public Water: Fire protection for the site shall be provided on site with adequate storage, distribution, and hydrants to properly extinguish fires. The system shall be designed as a potable water system. The system shall be designed to serve all on-site water needs as well as being capable of serving adjoining properties. Expansion of the water supply system, except when groundwater contamination has been documented, shall be prohibited without prior review for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Thompson called the roll and the motion passed (4-0) with the following vote: Page 10 of 11 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 4, 2019 AYES: Bower, Henderson, James, Woltz NAYES: None ABSTAIN: None Mr. Thompson stated the Board of Supervisors Public Hearing regarding this petition will be held on Tuesday, November 19, 2019, at 7:00 p.m. Citizens' Comments There were none. Comments of Planning Commissioners and Planning Staff There were none. Final Orders The petition The petition of Balzer and Associates, Inc. to obtain a Special Use Permit for a broadcasting tower (television tower) approximately 92 feet in height with an antenna approximately 53 feet in height (total height approximately 145 feet) in an AG -3, Agricultural/Rural Preserve, District on approximately 10.83 acres, located near the 8100 block of Honeysuckle Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District was approved by the Board of Supervisors at a Public Hearing on October 8, 2019. 2. The petition of Lewis Gale Medical Center to rezone approximately 1.44 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential District, District to C-1, Low Intensity Commercial, District for a medical office — free standing emergency room, located at 1423 West Ruritan Road, Hollins Magisterial District was approved by the Board of Supervisors at a Public Hearing on October 22, 2019. With no further business or comments, Mr. Henderson adjourned the meeting at 9:57 p.m. Respectfully Submitted: Susan McCoy Record!Dg_Secretary, Roanoke County Planning Commission Philip T ompson o Secret ry, Roanoke ou y Planning Commission Troy Hend n Chairma anoke County Planning Commission Page 11 of 11