HomeMy WebLinkAbout1/4/2011 - Regular1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF VINTON TOWN COUNCIL HELD AT 7:00
P.M. ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 4, 2011, IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE
VINTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING LOCATED AT 311 SOUTH POLLARD STREET,
VINTON, VIRGINIA.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Bradley E. Grose, Mayor
Robert R. Altice
Carolyn D. Fidler
Matthew S. Hare
William W. Nance
STAFF PRESENT: Chris Lawrence, Town Manager
Elizabeth Dillon, Town Attorney
Darleen Bailey, Town Clerk
Michael Kennedy, Public Works Director
Stephanie Dearing, Human Resources Manager
Anita McMillan, Planning Director
Herb Cooley, Police Chief
Joey Hiner, Assistant Public Works Director
Karla Turman, Planning Associate
Steve Doyle, Vinton Police Department
Tim Lawless, Police Officer
Agenda
A. 5:30 P.M. – Roll Call and Establishment of a Quorum
B. CLOSED MEETING
1. Request to Convene in a Closed Meeting Pursuant to §2.2-3711 (A) 3 –
Discussion or consideration of the acquisition of real property for a public
purpose or of the disposition of publicly held real property where discussion in
an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining position or negotiating
strategy of the public body
C. 7:00 P.M. – Reconvene and Adopt Recertification of Closed Meeting
D. INVOCATION
E. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE U. S. FLAG
F. CONSENT AGENDA
G. AWARDS, RECOGNITIONS, PRESENTATIONS
H. CITIZENS’ COMMENTS AND PETITIONS -This Section is reserved for comments and
questions for issues not listed on the
agenda
I. TOWN ATTORNEY
J. TOWN MANAGER
K. MAYOR
L. COUNCIL
1. Finance Committee Report
2. Public Safety Report
M. ADJOURNMENT
2
Mayor Grose called the regular meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
Following roll call, Councilman Nance moved to convene in a closed
meeting pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 (A) (3) of the Code of Virginia,
as amended, for discussion or consideration of the acquisition of real
property for a public purpose.
At 7:00 p.m., the regular meeting reconvened and the Town Clerk
read the Certification that the closed meeting was held in
conformance to State Code requirements. Mr. Altice made a motion
to adopt the Certification and Ms. Fidler seconded the motion that
passed with a unanimous roll call vote. Mr. Billy Booth gave the
invocation and Mr. Alticeled the Pledge of Allegiance to the U.S.
Flag.
Roll call, invocation
and Pledge of Alle-
giance to U.S. Flag.
Mayor Grose reported that he had received correspondence from
the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors concerning a resolution
they had adopted expressing concern with regards to alcoholic
energy drinks.
He asked everyone to keep Mary Beth Layman and her family in
their thoughts and prayers as they grieve the loss of her brother and
a beloved aunt.
Mr. Hare reported on the January 3, 2011 Finance Committee
meetingthat included discussion on the Town’s October and
November financial results. Mr. Hare noted thatchanges have been
made to the budget to more accurately reflect and track whether
revenues and expenses are where they are expected to be.
He reported that in October, revenues were at 101% or
approximately $26,000 more than was anticipated and expenditures
were at 85%, mostly due to hiring delays. Mr. Hare advised that the
General Fund was in good shape for the month of October.
It was noted the Utility Fund revenues were slightly below
expectations for Octoberand expenditures were running drastically
under what was anticipated for some reason. Heexplained that the
Finance Committee is trying to determine why expenditures are
running below anticipated levels. Mr. Hare noted that the number of
water and sewer delinquencies have increased and praised the
Town employees for working with customers who were not able to
pay on time.
Mr. Hare reported that in November, revenues were slightly
downdue to the fact that sales tax income came in later than usual.
He noted that expenditures were also lower than anticipated for
November due to delays in purchases and in hiring.
3
He advised that revenues for the Utility Fund were low again in
November. He noted that if the December results remain the same,
it will probably be necessary to come up with an action plan to
increase revenues.
Mr. Hare moved to accept October and November’s Financial
Statements. The motion was seconded by Ms. Fidler and passed
with all in favor.
Mayor Grose thanked Mr. Hare and staff for their efforts in putting
the report together in a way that was easily read and understood.
Mr. Hare reported that the Finance Committee reviewed the
comments from the auditors and that a thorough, detailed response
to those comments has been completed that indicates controls are
being put in place to address the issues. He noted that the Town is
going to have to refocus attention on collecting delinquent accounts.
Mr. Lawrence advised that all of the issues discussed at the Public
Safety Committee meeting will be reviewed by Captain Cook at the
work session.
Mr. Nance thanked all Town employees who were required to work
over the holidays. He complimented Public Works for their hard
work and dedication to ensure that the streets of the Town were
clean and safe for the public during the Christmas Day snow fall.
Mr. Hare brought up an issue regarding the Town’s refuse collection.
He noted that the Town Code has not been consistently applied
throughout the Town which he believed to be the cause of an
infestation of rodents. He felt that the Town needs to better enforce
the Code and to educate the citizens of the Town on the issue of
refuse. Mr. Lawrence responded that staff has been discussing the
issue and is aware that they need to review the Code to see if it
needs to be improved or changed.
Mayor Grose adjourned the regular meeting at 7:45 p.m.
WORK SESSION
1. Discussion – Commercial Trucks
Mr. Lawrence noted that he had switched the order of the work session items 1
and 3 so that Ms. Turman, who has a long drive home, can leave.
4
Karla Turman reviewed staff’s recommendations regulating commercial vehicles
in residential neighborhoods. She noted that the draft ordinance retained the
original Code section stating that any vehicle equipped with two or more rear
axles would be considered a commercial vehicle. This would include any trucks
with an extended work platform such as a “cherry picker”, a bucket truck, trucks
with a gross weight exceeding 7,500 pounds, tractor cabs, farm tractors,
construction equipment, passenger buses, trailers, semi-trailers, limousines, tow
truck, dump trucks as well asroll-back tow trucks, flatbed trucks, step vans, panel
trucks, box trucks or similar types of vehicles. Ms. Turman advised that school
buses, vans, light duty trucks or sport utility vehicles would not be considered to
be commercial vehicles even though they may exceed 7,500 pounds. She noted
that gross weight is determined by DMV and is included on the vehicle title.
In response to a question from Mr. Nance regarding church buses, Mr. Lawrence
recommended that the Ordinance exclude church buses.
Ms. Turman reported that the proposed ordinance would exclude taxi cabs as a
commercial vehicle. She noted that a trailer being used for commercial purposes
is treated the same as a commercial vehicle and cannot be parked in a
residential area unless it is being used for work being done on the property
where it is parked. A brief discussion took place on how staff determines
whether a trailer is being used commercially or not.
Ms. Turman pointed out that the last time Council discussed this issue, she had
asked if they wanted to treat commercial vehicles the same as recreational
vehicles which are allowed to park at the back of residential property and she
understood at that time they did not want commercial vehicles to have that
option.
Mr. Hare inquired as to whether commercial vehicle requirements were for
aesthetic purposes or for safety reasons and Ms. Turman replied that it was both.
Mr. Hare pointed out there were several people in his neighborhood who have
been parking their trucksin Dillon Woods for years that would be highly upset if
the Town suddenly began advising the owners that this was a violation of the
Town Code. Ms. Turman explained that the ordinance is difficult to enforce if no
one complains because the vehicles are usually only parked at the
residencesafter business hours.
Following considerable discussion on the definition of a commercial vehicle, Mr.
Lawrence reported that he did not want the Town’s enforcers to have to go out
with a measuring tape to determine whether a truck meets the ordinance
requirements or not. He pointed out that everyone seems to be in agreement
with the ordinance except for the cross section of pick-up trucks that can become
very large with the addition of utility beds on the back. He asked Council to
determineduring the next couple of weeks, how they want the Town to deal with
this type of vehicle. He stated that staff is not “pro-actively” enforcing the code
5
at the present time but if they receive a complaint that is legitimate, they do
respond to it.
Following comments by each Council member on the proposed ordinance, Ms.
McMillan stated that she received a request from a resident on Gates Lane that
wants to park a limousine on his property and asked Council to consider adding
limousines to the list of vehicles that would be allowed in residential areas.
Following considerable discussion on the proposed commercial vehicle
ordinance, Council was unable to come to a consensus on the issue.
2. Discussion – Police Department Capital Projects
Captain Cook highlighted projects that are needed in the Police Department and
indicated that the Finance Committee had been fully briefed on the projects at
their last meeting.
Captain Cook reviewed the purpose and benefits of individually assigned
vehicles for Police officers. He reported that the approximate cost of a vehicle on
the lease plan is $40,000 each in comparison to fleet vehicles that required the
purchase of twoor three vehicles each year at a cost of $280,000. He noted that
the lease plan allows the Department to have more vehicles for the same period
of time for $130,000 less.
Captain Cook advised that the current lease will expire in 2011 andrequested to
use funds in the Wireless 911 account to pay for the first year of the vehicle lease
renewal costs.
Mr. Lawrence added that he would like tolook into including the Town
Manager’s Crown Victoria in the lease agreement if Council authorizes the
lease renewal.
Mr. Nance asked how the leasing of theentire vehicle fleet compared to
the cost of purchasing two or three new cars each year. Captain Cook
replied that the leased vehicles would cost about $52,000 and the
purchase of two or three new cars would be $80,000 to $120,000annually.
Captain Cook reported that the second capital project involved the
development of an interview room and moving the records office to a
corner of the former communications office. He noted that the current
records office would become the interview room. The Captain pointed out
that this would give the Records Clerk a measure of security that she does
not currentlyhave. He reported that part of the former communications
room would be usedas a conference/ EOC area. He advised that the only
structural changes needed would be the addition of a non-load bearing
wall for the Records Office. Captain Cook reported that bids for needed
improvements for the Records Officecame in at $5,000.
6
The Captain reported on the third capital project which involves the
conversion of an existing jail cell into an evidence processing area. The
Captain noted thatthe area currently being used as an evidence area
would revert back to its original use as a break room. He reported that the
total cost for the communications room upgrades would be approximately
$17,000; the costs for the interview room would be about $3,000 which
includes the cost of a camera system if it is needed; and the evidence
processing room is estimated to cost approximately $5,000.
Other Police Department financial needs discussed were: $5,000 needed
for the Verizon Trunk fee and $4,228 for data sharing which involves the
multi-jurisdictional server that allows the Police to retrieve information from
several jurisdictions.
In summary, Captain Cook reported that the requested projects would be
brought to Council for a formal vote at their January 18th meeting.
3. Town Logo and Branding
Mr. Lawrence briefly reviewed the information in the Council meeting packet
regarding a new town logo and branding of the Town that was derived from the
Downtown Plan Study. Following a short discussion on a proposed tagline that
would be part of the logo (Hometown Values, Dynamic Vision), it was decided that
the tagline would be removed from the logo. A discussion ensued on the ways that
the new logo and branding could be used to market the Town.
The work session adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
APPROVED:
Bradley E. Grose, Mayor
ATTEST:
Darleen R. Bailey, Town Clerk